The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3188; COLLEGE BLVD EXTENSTION; DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS;i. fliJ Testing Engineers-San Diego + A Division of United States Testing Company Inc S 71i - 3467Kurtz SL, P.O. Box 80985, SAn-Diego; ca. 92138(619) 225-9641 . .: I - 2956 IndUstry. Street, Oceanside, CaIiforn1a . . . . . . . 9054 (619) 7570248 . DAILY RESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE or Tcir _6/17,18,23g25'/87 S ***NUCLEAR DENSITIES*** LOCATION City of Carlsbad 5; FILE HO 5259 PROJEcT_CollegeBlvd_ImprovementsProiect#3188 LAS. No 087355 ., . oyp REPORT 7/2/87 _:: CoNTRAcToR . . . _EST No L 0 C A TI ON PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. . IN PLACE DRY DENSITY -- MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COUP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COUP. R E M A -. S 1. Station 62+45 at-E.D.L. Line Center Line Trench El.; 46.91 . . 18.1 .. 14.0 . .104.9 116.0. . . 90 - .. . Complies • 2 . Center Line Trench - El,47' -18.2 Station 61+00 at E.D.L. Line 11.4-- 113.2 125.0 -90 91 Complies,. 3 I Station 59+15 - at E.D.L. Drain . Center Line Trench El. 47.5' . - 18.3 . . . - 17.5 . 107.4 . . - 111.8 .90 . . 90 . . . - 96 . Complies 4 Station 55+00 at E.D.L.-Drain - . • Center Line Trench El. 51.0' - - .. . 22.2 . . . . . 20.5• . . ••. 94.4 .. . :. - 104.0 - -: - -90 - . 91 .. -- Complies - 5 Center Lino Trench _El. _47.5'- 18.5 Station 63+15. at-E.D.L. Drain Line 14.0 .106.4 --116.0 -90 92 Complies 6 Station 58+00 Water.' Mail Line - Center Line Trench' _El _49.0' . 15.9 16.9 - - - 106.2 -. - --12-3.1 -90 - -. -92 Complies - 7 13-'S Center LineEl.45' 12.6 Station 70+00 E.Q.L. Line 14.0 113.4 116.0 90 .98 - Complies 8 - 1' 5 Center Line : El. 39.5' - Station 71+00 E.D.L. Line 17.6 - 20.5 105.3 107.5 90 98-- Complies - - - 9 - 1'SCenter _Line Trench - El-.47'-47.5 18.5. Station 66+25 E.D.L. Drain Line -17.5 100.6 111.5 -90 90 Complies _--.---- 10 CenterLineTrench El. 47' 20.0- Station 67+64-.75 E.D.L. Drain Line 17.5 100.7 1 -111.5 90 90 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - - - -- . TESTS MADE BY TESTING -ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. - - THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT -BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR.JOD CONTROL. -TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO - - - - - - - - -- REVIEWED BY, - - 0 'S Colleqe Blvd Improvements Proi #3188 pan 2 TEST No. L 0 C A TI 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. 'IN PLACE DRY '-DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS .' S 11 Center Line Trader. El. 49' — 49.5 18.7. Station 67+58 E.D.L. Line , '17.5' 106.6 111.5 90 96 Complies 12 2'NCenterLine _-El .45' _', Station 68+50 E.DL. Line 23.2 '.20.5 ,98.7 107.5 ,90 , ' 92 Complies ; 13 E.D.L. Drain Line El. 47' 0 15.1 .14.0 Station '68+40 E.D.L. Line 108.0 116.0.. ,90 93 Complies 14 Station 67+94.75 E.D.L. Line Center Line Trench E1.47' 15.7 14.0 'o , 105.7' 116.0 '90 " ''91 Complies _15 Station 73+48 E 0 L Line Center Line Trench El 31' - 31.51. 14.6 14.0 96.9_ 107.5 90 90 Complies 16 Station 71+70 E 0 L Line Center Line Trench El. 381 ,, ' 18.3 '14.0 ' 98.4 '107.5 '90 '' ,92 Complies O is 1) NBS/Lowry." TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO - REVIEWED BY Albert, F. deBerardinis North County Branch Manager ( JI1 Testing Engineers-San Diego A Div sion of United States Testing Company, lnc III 3467KurtzSt,PO B 80985S0 Ca 92438 (619) 225-9641 C E V ED FJ 2956 Industry . Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757 -0248 OCT 7 CITY W MUNICIPAL PRO DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE 'DENSITY TESTS .' DATE OF TEST ' . ' " ' LOCATION Carlsbad', California FILE No 5259 PROJECT College Blvd Improvements Project #3188 LAB.' No.' ' " ' DATE OF REPORT 9/24/87 _'. CONTRACTOR TEST NO ' . S L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST.. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY "DENSITY, PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE .' , R E M A R K S MOIST. , DENSITY , ' REQUIRED COMP. 6/26 EDL Line Station 75+35 .17 ' ' 1'Scenterlinetrench 16.5 20.5 105.3 107.5, '90 98 ' Complies , EDL Line Station 76+00 center line 18 trench @ west end conc. ofstorm_drain 17.7 20 _5 104_4 107.5 90 97 Complies 19 . EDL Line Station 76+60 . . Complies. . 2' 5 center line.trench 21.8. 20.5 97.6 107.5 90 91 EDL Drain Line Station 78+44 S center line.d.f trench ' . 2,0 :, 22.0 20.5 98.5 , 107.5 90 ' ' ' 92 Complies EDL Drain Line Station 79+50 . . . 21 Cener line of trench 19.3 17.5 106.2 111.5 90 .95 Complies , EDL Drain. Line Station 81+90' . 22 ' Center line of trench ' . . ' 20.7 20.5 . 98.1 107.5 90 91 ' Complies 7/1 23 ., 14" Waterline (S side) Station 74+70V_N.of center line . 20.3 20.5 1 102.5 .107.5 90 95 Complies , .14" Waterline.' (S side) '24 Station 75+80 center line 17.2 20.5 105.7_ 107.5 90 ' 98 Complies 14" Waterline' (S side) • ' • ' ' ' ' ' . ' . 25. 'Station 74+00 V N of center 'line 14.0 , 20.5. 104.9 107.5 90 -98 ' Complies. ' 7/2 ' On E bound side College Blvd.' at.. , • .. .. ' . 95.4 ' ' ' ' ' ' . ,. ' 26 * 21 E center line 'of Man Hole #6 ([i'd) 20.8 18.5 11.00 _ 90 87 •1. Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM i s* ' , TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. * Beginning of Punch List Items ' TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN '. PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP., 7/2 On. E bound aide' College Blvd. at 27 3' N center line of. Man Hole #7 ' 26.0 18.5 95.0. 'llO.IL 90 86 Does not comply . On E bound side of College at Man Hole 28 #8 231 N centerline of Man Hole 29.5 18 5 92-.9 110.0. 90 85 Does not comply 7/3 EDL Drain Line Station 39+05 29 Center line of Trench 63W' B T C 11.9 14A 104.3 116.5' 90 90 Complies [DL Drain Line Station 39+00 30 Center line -of Trench 4' B.T.C. 10.4 14.0 105.5 116.5 90 ' 91 7/8 Man Hole #10 Station 28+3,0 Complies '. 31 4".Nc'enter_line_of_ Man _Hole_5'.'R.T..C. .11.2 1 11.5. .99.3 121.0 .90 82 __'.. Does_not'complv Man Hole #10 Station 28+30 32.: .4'N _center line of Man Hole 5'B.T.C. 11.0 11.5 98.5 121.0 90 81 Doesnotcomply' Man Hole #10 33' B.T.C. 33' 331 S center line.of."ManHole __' 14.9 11.5 91.1 12.1.0 90 '75 Does_not_comply' Man Hole #10 33' B T C 34 5.3'. _5 center line _of Man Hole .11.8 11.5 95.0 121.0 90. _' ' _79 Does not _comply 7/9 Valve Cluster. East bound lane 35 Station _27+68Finish sub grade . 16.9 13.0 108.2 :120.0 90 :90' . Complies Valve Cluster East bound lane back- 35-BU Station 27+68 Finish subgradeuptes. 18.0 13.0 '107.7 120.0 90 90 Complies. Valve Clusters East bound lane Station40+566" _below finish subgrad .12.0 ' _, 14.0 .106.9 .'116.5 90 ' 92 . Complies Valve Cluster East bound lane Station 19+15 611,below _finishsubgrad 18.4 ,13.5 .108.3 118.0 90 '92 Complies Value Cluster East bound lane Station 13+001 '''. 16.1 ,13.0 109.5 '120.0 .90 91 Complies 7/13 Water Valves East side of.College . ' 39 Station 53+20 Probe test Probed&Dug down.J St PipeBEddingSand,Nofill. ' . Probe Okay. Valve Cluster East side of College 40 . Station.48+20__,... 9.5 8.8 123.9 .134.4 90 . 92 . Complies ', Page 3 TEST No ' ' S ' L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE .. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY' MAx. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY ' REQUIRED comp. 7/13 Man Hole #6 E bound side of College 26A 13+1 S of face of curb 3' B.T.C. ''21.8 14.0 105.3 116.5 90 90 ' Complies-RETEST OF #26 Man Hole #7.E bound side of College 27A 3' S center line of Man Hole Lid.3+'.BTL .18.5 18.5 100.6 110.0 90' , .92. 'Complies-RETEST OF #27 Man Hole #8 E bound side of College 28A 2+' W of:center'line Of Man Hole Lid: '22.9 ' . 18.5 '. 102.1. 110.0 ' 90 ' 93. Complies-RETEST oF#2 Man Hole #9 S side 3' B T C 41 3+' W of center line of Man Hole Lid ':22 *.,l 19 0 102 ..*8, 111.0. 90 93 Corn lies 7/14 14" Water Line S side 42 Station 87+00 center line trench 17'.7-20.5-'-99.8 107.5...90 93 Complies 14" Water Line Station 85+53 43 .. Center Line of trench El. 168.0 '. ' 20.0 20.5 .. 99..9 ' 107.5 90 . 93" Complies 14" Water line Station 75+00 44'. Center line trench El.221 ' ' ' 189 20.5 .99.3 .107.5 90 1..... ' 92 Complies ' 14" Water line Station 77+88 45 Center line trench El. 204 ' 21.7. 20.5 98.8 ' 107.5' . 90 ' ' 92 Complies . 14" Water line Station '81±50 46 Center line El 189 20.3 20.5 96 8 107 5 90 90 Complies 14" Water line Station 90+00 47.. El. 146" ' . ' ' 20.0 17.5 100.7 111.5 90 ' 90 'Complies 7/15 S side of Man Hole #19 3'.S. centerline 31A Man Hole Lid Also represents Retest 32 12.0 11 5 113 6 121 0 90 94 Complies-RETE ST #311 W side of Man Hole 4flO 3+' centerlii 33A: of Man Hole Lid also represents #34 '" 128 11.5' ' 112.7 121.0 ' 90 . . '93 '&3 Complies-RETEST. W side at Man Hole--#11 '4' B.T.C. 48 3' Wof center line of Man Hole Lid ' 17.3 ' ' 11.5 109.4 121.0 90 ' 90 Complies ' S side at Man Hole #12 3+' BT.C. 49 4' 5 center line of Man Hole Lid . 15.2 11.5 110.4 121.0 ' 90 , 91 Complies 7/21 14" Water Line Station 90+91 50 1' S center line Trench El. 137' 18.7 1 20.5 1 99.0 107.5 90. 92 Complies S Is D1... :paae 4 TEST No • . L 0 CA TI 0 N __________ IN PLACE - OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY _____________ PERCENT REL. Co.iP. PERCENT RELATIVE 'R £ M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQIJIREO COMP. 7/21 ." 14" Water Line Station 90+91 Back up . . . . *5.BU 1' S. center line trench EL. 137 to 50 18.2 20.5 100.2. 107.5 90 93 Complies 14" Water: Line Station 92+00 52 •' Center line of trench El. 135' 18.7 20.5 99.5 107.5 90 93. Compl.ies 14" Water Line Station 93+97 . 53 1' 5 center line of trench El. 128 . 15.0; . . 13.0' 110.2 119.0 90 '. .93 Complies 14" Water line Station 95+00 54 Center line of Trench'El.' 116' ' 18.2 17.5 101.2. 111.5 . 90 90 ' Complies '7/24 .East bound lanefi'nish sub grade 2+' BT,' ' 55 Station 3+00-7' 5 center ]ihe of.roadwy 10.2 ' 12.0 . 112.1 122.5 9.0 •. 92 . ' Complies East bound lane finish sub grade 56 Station 79±60 11 1 N center line . 10.1 ' 12.0 109.8 122.5 90 . 90 . , : Complies East bound lane finish sub grade 57 .Station 3+44 7' N center line • 10.7 , 12.0 , .110.8 122.5' ' . .90 • .91 Complies East bound lane, finish sub'grade - S , '. ,• . . . ' ' . ' . ' , , ' . 58 Station 34-24 11' N center line '' . 8.7 . . 12.0 ' 111.6. . 1.22.5' . ' 90 . 91'. . Complies East bound lane Station 7+00 59 , 1' N center line finish sub grade 9.5 , , 1.1 .5 ' 117.2 ' 124.0 . 90 . .95 Complies bound side 'Station 10+16 . ,East .": , ., , , ' , ., ' ' ' 60 6' S center line finish sub grade 14 7 11.5 112 .3, 124..0 91 Complies East bound side Station 10+40 9' N center line finish sub grade , 12.6 11.5 .113.6 ' 124.0 . 90 92 . ' Complies' East bound side Station 2±75 62 . 10' 5 centerline finish sub grade ' 13.1 11.5 115.4 122.5'. 90 94 Complies , 'East bound side Station 2+85 63 14' N center line finish sub grade. 13.3 11.5' 111.6 122.5 ' 90' - 9,1 Complies - West bound lane Station 2±83 64 ' 18' S center line' finish sub grade ' 10.4 ' '11.5 , 117.5 ' 124.0 90 . 95 Complies West bound lane' Station 8+50. 65 6'N center line. finish sub grade ' 11.1 11.5 113.0 124.0. 90 --91 1 Complies ls C11,-.? Q1,-1' Tn .'rs,EmEr+c D4r'1 '1 p;rIp TEST No . . . L 0 C A T I 0 N . PLACE. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCEr REL. CoMp: PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. . DENSITY . REOUIRE,O COMP.' . .7/24 . West bound lane Station 14+50 '. '• '- .. . . . ': . .66 10' N center line finish sub grade _15.8 11.5 115.6 124.0 90 . 93 Complies West bound lane Station 18+95 67 4' S center line finish sub grade . 8.1 11.5 ' 110.9 124.0 90 '' 90 Complies 7/25 East bound lane Station 29+75 68 10 N' center line finish sub grade 10.8 13 0 108.4 120.0 90 - 90..'Complies East bound lane Station 29+48 69 7' 5 center line .finish sub grade . 10.1 .. 13.0 112.2 '1300 .' 90...._..... 94 Complies East bound lane' Station 31+45 70 7' S center line finish sub grade 10.9 , 13.0 109.7 1200 90 ' .91 Cnmpi'ies , East bound lane Station 32+00 .71 ' .7'. S center line, finish sub grade 11.3 ' 13.0 _108.4 120.0 90 90__" Complies East bound lane Station 32+50 72 Centerline _finish sub grade 9.4 ..1.0 110.5 120.0 90 - 92. Complies'_'' East bound lane Station 32+40 73 71 Ncenter_line_finish_sub _grade 9.4 ._130 .110.4 120.0. ' _90' 92 Cnmp1ic' East bound lane Station 33+00 74 . 71 N center line: finish sub grade 7.9 . 13.0 111.1 120.0 90 . 93 . Complies.,..' .1 East bound 'lane 'Station 34+25 . . 75 10' 5 center line 'firish sub grade . 10.5 13.0 106.8---- 120 .0 _ .. 89 !not 'comply East bound lane Station 34+75 76 8' W center line finish sub, grade 8.5 . '13.0 109.7 " 120.0 90 91 Complies East bound lane Station 35+60 77 . 1' S center line finish sub grade . 9.4 . . 13.0 '' 107.9 ' 120.0 90 90 ' Complies East bound lane: Staton 36+00 78 1' 5 line finish sub gr ade ,center , 9.0 13.0 ' 108.0 120.0 90 90 . Complies East bound lane Station 37+40 79 3' N center Tine finish sub grade' . 9.3' 13.0: 107.1 120.0 , 90 1 89 , Does not comply East bound lane Station 40+00 80 ' center line of road "finish sub grade 10.0 11.5 110.0 ' 122.5 .90 90. Complies ' ls Co1'lge' Blvd., Improvements Project #3188. TEST No ' 0 L 0 C AT 10 N '. IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY. MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENV REL. COMP... PERCENT RELATIVE RE M A R KS MOIST.. DENSITY ' . REQUIRED COMP. West Bound Lane 3' S. Center Line' 81 'Station 39+85 Finish Sub Grade' ' '18.9 ' '11.5 ' 109.7' 122.5 : 90 90 Complies West Bound Lane Center Line Station 39+70 _FinishSub__Grade 10_7 11 _5 115_1 122.5 90 94 Complies West Bound Lane Station 35+50 4 5 83 _' .Center Line' Finish Sub Grade , 8.0 11.5 ' 110.9 ' 122.5 __' 90. 91 ,Cornjiies West Bound Lane Station 35+65 Center 84 Line Finish Sub Grade '.',. 9.1 ',11..5' .111.7 122.5 90 ''91 Comolies West Bound Lane Station'29±40 9' N ' , , ' ' ' •. ' ' •' ' ' '. ' ... ' ' ' 0 85 ' CenterLine Finish'Sub Grade p' 11.5 111.0 122.5 . . 90 ' 1 91 Compiles West' Bound Lane Station 29+55 10' 86 S Center Line Finish Sub Grade ' 6.6 . "11.5 115.5 1.22.5 ' 90 ' 94 'Complies. ' West Bound Lane Station 28+99 Center 87 Line Finish Sub Grade 10.7 11.5 113.8 122.5 90 93 Complies Jest Bound Lane Station 28+89 1' 5 88' . Center "Line Finish Sub Grade 10.8 13.0 113.1' 120.0 ' ' 90 94 Complies West Bound Lane Station 25+42 6' 5 89 CenterLineFinishSubGrade 9_2 13_0 108__8 120_0 90 91 Complies ' East Bound Lane Station 27+50 9' N _90 CenterLineFinishSubGrade 8_9 11.5 112_5 121_0 90 93 Compliec East Bound Lane Station 27+60 Center 91 Line Finish Sub Grade . ' 11.8 11.5 '. 109.9 . ' 121.0 90 '91'_. Complies in Median' Station 28+05 Center..,Break 92 Line Finish Sub'Grade 11.2 .11.5 109.6 ' 121.0 90' 91. Complies West Bound Lane Station 28+40 Center 93 Line F inish 'Sub Grade , 8.0 11.5 112.0 121.0 90 ' ' 90 Complies ,East Bound Lane Station 28+40,5' N 94 CenterLine _Finish Sub Grade ' 9.3 11.5 .111.1 121.0 ' .90 92.. Complies East. Bound Lane Station 28+10 3' 95 Center Line Finish Sub Grade . 12..8 11.5 115.3 121.0 90 .. 95 Complies'' nl1pop Blvd. Tmn'rovernents Proiect'#3'188 TEST No. L. 0 C A T I 0 N - '• IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. 'IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. CoMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP: R E M AR K S East Bound Lane Station. 12+2012 S 96 Center Line Finish Sub Grade ' 12.5 13.0 108.9 120.0 '1 90 90 Complies East Bound Lane Station 12+00 2' N 97 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 10.8 13.0 108 4 120.0- 90 91 Complies East Bound Lane Station 12+25 Center 98 Line Finish Sub Grade 15.2 13.0' 107.4 12.0 .0 90 90 Complies East Bound Lane Station 18+00-.9'. N 99 Center line Finish Sub Grade 10.0 ' 13.0 109.0 120.0 ' 90 91 Comliec ' East Bound Lane Station 19+50 4' 5 100 _'Finish_ Sub _Grade _Center_Line 12.0' 13.0 , 109.6 120.0 90 91 complies East Bound Lane Station 22+00 Center 101 LineFinishSubGrade 12.6. 13 _0 110.6 120.0 90 92 Complies East Bound Lane Station 4+60 9' E 102 Center_Line_Finish_Sub._Grade 9.1 11.5 110.0 122.5 _'. '90 '._'90' Complies East Bound Lane Station 4+60 7' E 103 ':' Center Line Finish Sub' _Grade 9.3 11.5 109.7 122.5. ''90 .'.'90-' Complies 'East Bound Lane Station 4+60 Center 104 Line Finish Sub Grade . 12.3 11.5 109.6 122.5- , ' 90 90 Complies . . East Bound Lane College Station 4+68 105 ill S Ctrline Fini'ch SIJh (rade 1fl.6 11J 110.4' 122Ji Qfl ' gp- ' Cnmpliec East Bound Lane College Station 4+68 106 Center Line Fini sh Sub Grade ' '8.9 11.5 110.0 122.5 '"90 '90' Complies East Bound Lane College Station7±00. 107 -1'NCtrline'Depth _ofTrans.8" 11.3 11.0 - 114.9 124.0 90'. 94 ' Complies SW' TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO:':- 'REVIEWED BY DFit of Trlsbad 1) LAttn NBS/Lowry Kirk P Ammerman Attn: Kurt Gierlich North County Branch Manager Jil Testing Engineers—San Diego 1 A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 S 1' KurtzSt., P.O. Box 80985, SanD/ego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I —=) 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 . DAILY RESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST flR-2R—R7 S. LOCATION .City of Carlsbad FILE No. 5259 PROJECT _College Blvd Ixnprovementc LAB. NO.°87472 DATE OF REPORTL._l0-28-87 CONTRACTOR . . TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM . MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY . DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 8-28SAND CONE `]. : . •. . . S. W/Bnd lane (Act. S/Bnd) St a. 3+70 . . . 25 1 1 /2 ' B.T.C. .5' N Center line 4.8 8.0. 144.4 :140.0. 95 100+ Complies 9-1 NUCLEAR DENSITY-'~ ... . .5... N Bnd lane 25' from outside end 4.2 8.0 132.5 140. 95 95 Complies 255 -of Tsln1W/side of Rd 9' W Center line N Bnd lane 25' from outside end . . S 256 . . , is 4.2 8.0 land sland W/side of Rd 9 W .. 132.3 140.0 95 95 Complies Center line . . S. . 257 N Bnd lane E/side of Rd 24' from . , . 5.8 . 8.0 . . ; 1 37.6 . . 140.0 . 95 . 98 . Complies. end of Island 12 Center line . . -. . . . . . .. . - N Bnd lane E/side of Rd. 24' from 4.6 8.0 140.1 140.0 95 . . 100 Complies 258 end of Island 17' = Center fln.e_ 140.0 259 N Bnd lane Sta 4+53 4.5 . 5 8.0 . . 131.5 S 95 94 Does not comply 2 1/2 W Center line __._..:_......_.....___ ____ THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OH JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED I-Y ('0T.T.PC1' 1T.11T1 TMPPO\JP.MF.NTc PA(F. 9 1fl-79-R7 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Drn PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 CA T I 0 N' PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 9- .1 Y -R D E'NSTTY':) . . . N lane Sta. 4+53' ,Bnd 260 2'1/2' W Center line 50 8.0 132.6 140.0 95 95' Complies N Bnd lane Sta '4+53 2 61 E/side of Rd 10'.:E'Center line .5.9. 8.0 137.3 140.0 95 98 Complies ..'. 262 N Bnd lane Sta'. 4+66 0 ' 5:6 8.0 ' 136.3 140.0 . 95 .97 Complies Center line . . . ' .. . . . 263 NBnd lane at Man Hole 2 ,: ' 5.8 8.0 ' 124.4 140.0. .95 . ' 89 Does not comp 1' N of Man Hole 264 ', N Bnd lane .W/edge 12 1/2 W , ' 6.3 . 8.0 '127.6 140.0' 95 ' . 91 Does' not comply Center line 28 1/2 from nose . . . . ., . . 1 1 .0 h face oft curb 265 N Bnd' lane E/d.ge 12 1/2' E " ' 5.7 8.0 ' 127.8 140.0 95 91 ' Does iot comply C8nterlie 28'L-2.Lfom 1"7" off curb N Bnd lane 13' W'Center line 266 2' Eof curb Sta. 5+00 7.7 .8.0, 1.26.5 140.0 95 ' '90' ' Does not. comply N Bnd lane 13' W center line 2' 267 E of curb Stá 5+00 shift gauge 6.9 . 8.0 '. 132.4 140.0 95 . 95 Complies 6' slot 268 N Bnd 'lane St.a +94 o , sand 1/2". 64 ' 8.0 128.2 140.0 95 92 Does not comply W centerline slight rock point N Bnd lane Sta 5+04 with sand ., 269 1/2" W. centerline slight ro,ckpoin: .6.1 8.0 127.5 , :140.0 ' 95 . .91 .' Does not. c omply 270 N Bnd lane E/edge 13 1 /2' E ' 6.4 8.0 19.8 140.0 - 95 93 . Does not, comply _____ Center line Sta.. 5+08 cT.Tva1 TT.UT1 TMPROVF.MENTS PAGE 3 10-28-87 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R £ M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-1 NUCLEARSIT7 NBnd' lane Sta 6+95 E/edge Rd . 271 14' E Center line . 6.2 8.0 130.4 .140.0 95 93. . Does not complies 272 N Bnd lane E/ed'geRd 13 1/2' E 6.3 8.0 132.7 .140.0 95 95 Complies Center line 1 1 /2 off street or curb Sta. 7+05 273 N Bnd lane Man -Hole 3iRd SO. I 3.9' 8.0 123.3 140.0 95 88 Does not comply 274 NBnd lane Sta'. 9+40 . ' 5.7 8.0. ' 131.2 140.0 ' 95 94 Does not compl 2 W Center line N Bnd lane Man Hole 1/4 3' So. 275 Center line ' ., .3.6 8.0 119.3 140.0 95 ' 85 ' Does not comply N Bnd lane -13".W Center line 276 Sta 12+40 W/Edge . 7.9 8.0 131.5 140.0 95 94 Does not comply N bound lane 9' east '. 277 Center line 7.8 8.0 131.4 140.0 95 . 94 . Does not comply. 278 N Bnd lane W/side 17+84 . 5.4 8.0 134.9 140.0 95 96' Complies 10'. W Center line 279 N Bnd lane Sta., 20+50 ' 8.4 8.0 ' 17.7 140.0 95 . .91 Does not comply Center line N Bnd lane Stá. .20+502 1 /2' 280 Center line ' ' ' 6.3 .8.0 ' 128.0 140.0 95 ' 91 Does not comply N Bnd lane Sta'. 23+80 281 3' E Center lin,e ' 5.6 8.0 138.3 140.0 95 99 Complies 282' N Bnd Lane Sta. 26+00 ' '6.1 ' 80 125.1 140.0 95 ' 89 Does not comply' Center line 283 N Bnd lane Sta 07+35 3.8 ' 8.0 126.7 ' 140.0 95 91 Does not, comply COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PACE 4 10-28-87 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DnY - PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 CA T I 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY ' DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE REMARKS. - MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-1 NUCLEAR 1 Bnd lane valve.ciuster at Sta. 284 27+68 E/side of cluster 6.3 , 8.0' ' 131.3 140.0 95 94 '' Does not comply 285 Bnd lane Valve cluster st sta. ' 5.2 8.0 '123.2 140.0. 95 88 Does not comply • 27+68 N/side of' cluster Bnd lane Island So. Nose 5' So. 286 Tose Sta. 28+45 3.7 .8.0 ' , 125.4 140.0 95 87 , Does not comply 287 N Bnd lane Sta 32+00 6.3 8.0 127 4 140.0 05 91 Does not comply • 5 S Center 288 'T Bnd lane Sta 36+15 5 6 8.0- 127 7 140.0 95 91 Does not comply Center line ' •• ' ' . 289 N Bnd lane Approximately '' ' ' ' ' 38+10' 5' So. Centerline ' ' , 6.0 8.0., 131.4 140.0 . ' 95 :94 Does not comply 290 N Bnd lane Sta. •39+60 2'' So. Centerline 5.7 8.0 128.2 140.0 95 92 Does not comply 9-9, NU C LEAR DEN SffV': 291 ECenter line trench EDL 10.9 9.'5 102.8. 128.0 90 80 Does not comply tip-in Sta 1+46 292 11/2' ECent:r line trench EDL 10.5 9.5 . 105.7 128.0 90 83 floes not comply tie-in Sta 1+6 293 Sta. 1+47 Center line - '7.6 9.5 105.2' 128.0 ' 90 82 Does not' comply 9-17 CEAR DEN S ITYT) • .. S ' . . . 294' Sidewalk N Side'of College Blvd 8.2 14.0 ' 107.5 116.5 - 90 ' 92 Complies' 3+45 Sidewalk N sid,e of College Blvd • ' 295 4+45 10.3 14.0- 106.3 116.5 90 91 Complies ('ñT T T \Tfl TMPPC17PM1'11T c fl-2R -7 TEST No. L 0 C A T 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 NUCL-EAR DENSI .. . - Sidewalk N side of College Blvd . . 296 5+45 6.3 14.0 107.8 116.5 90 93 Complies 2 7 Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 6.6 14.0 110.0 116.5 90 94 Complies 6+45 Sidewalk N side of. College Blvd 298 7+45 7.4 14.0 110.2 116.5 .9.0 95 Complies 299 Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 8.5 14.0 110.9 116.5 90 95 Complies . S 8+45 . Sidewalk N side *.o of CollegeBlvd 300 10+45 . . :8.5 14.0 110.8 .116.5 90 95 Complies. 301 Sidewalk N side 301 of College Blvd - 14.0 107 6 116 5 90 92 Complies 12+45 - . Sidewalk N Side. of College Blvd . 302. 14+45 .. . 9.6 . 14.0 -113.5 .116.5 90 97 Complies 303 Sidewalk N Sidewalk College Blvd 105 14.0 102.3 116.5 90. 88 . Does not comply 16+50 304 Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 7.1 14.0 104.9. 116.5 -90 90 Co - mplies. 18+50 5 . 305 Sidewa lk 'N ice of College Blvd 19.3 . 1.4.0: . 99.7 116.5 90 86 Does not comply 2.0+5.0 . . . . . . . . 306 Sidewalk .'N Side of College Blvd 11.2 . 14.0 105.3 116.5 90 90 Complies' 22+50 . . . 307 -Sidewalk N Side of College Blvd 24+50 . 8.5 14.0 109.7 116.5 90 94 Complies. 308 Sidewalk 26+50 N Side of College . Blvd 7.4 14.0 102.8 116.5 90 88 Does not comply 309 5' E of Center line of W lane 4.2 8.0 136.2 137.0 95 . 99 Complies _____ 53+00 5 COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 6 10-28-87 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. OIlY PERCENT PERCENT No. L. f 1 A T' 0 N PLACE MOIST. I DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE REMARKS . . MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 (NUCLEAR TTY1 _ 310' 6' W of Center line., of W lane 4.2 .8.0 '13.2 137.0. . 95 99 Complies 50+00 7' E of Center Iine.of W lane 311 47+00 4 7 8.0 128 8 137 0 94 Complies 312 8' W of Center line of W lane,3.2. 8.0. 137 5 137 0 95 100+ Complies 44+00 313 9' E of CEnter line of W lane 3 4 8 0 136 4 137 0 95 100 Complies 41+00 8' W of Center line of W lane 314 38+00 4 0 8.0 136.6 137 0 95 100 Complies 10' E of 'Center line of 'W lane' 315 , 35+00 .. '. 2.7 8.0 133.8 '137.0 95 , .' 98F Complies 316 7' W of Center line of W lane 7+flfl ' 2.9' ' 8.0 . 141.2 137.0 95 100+ Complies ' 5' E of Center line of W lane 317 29+00 3 7 8.0 129 5 137 0 95 95 Complies 318 8' W p Center line of W lane 2-- -6Q0 . 4 8 8 0 129 6 137 0 95 95 Complies 319 6' E of Center line of W lane 4.2 8 10 132.8 137 0 ______ 95 97 Complies 23+00 320 8' W of Center line of W lane 4 5 8 0 138 8 137 0 95 100+ Complies 20+00 321 11' E of Center line of ,W. lane 5.2 17 -4-flfl -8.0' 132.2 137.0 95 97 Complies 322 W of Center . line of W lane 5.3 8.0 136.3 ' 137.0 95 ' 100 Complies 14+00' 8'.E of Center' line of W lane 323 ' 11+00 . . . . 4.0 8.0 133.1 137.0 96 . 97 Complies ('ñTT( 1T\TTh TMP(WPMPMTQ TEST L 0 C A T 1 IN PTIMUM OMOIST. DRY STY - - R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-17UCLEAR ENSI7 324 9' W of Center line of w lane 8+00 6.1 8 0 137 3 137 A 95 100+ Complies 325 4' E of Center line of W lane 5F00 . 4 9 8.0 130.7 137 0 95 95 Complies 326 8' W of Center line of W lane 5.2 . . 8.0 135.1 137.0 95 99 Complies 1+46 13' E of Center line of 32 7 W iane 7 3 8.0 131.5 137. 0 95 . 96 Complies 328 2'w of Centerline of E lane 1+45 6.5 . 8.0 133.7 S 137.0 95 98 Complies 329 4' W of Center line of E lae 1+20 6 4 8;0 128.8 137.0 95 94 Does not comply 5' E of Center line of E lane 330 1+20 7.5 80 129.4 137.0 95 95 Complies 331 215 W of W lane 28' N of Center line of Palomar Airport Rd.. 8.4 8.0 132.3 137 0 95 97 Complies 160 W of W lane 29' N of Center, 332 line of Palomar Airport Rd 7.7 8.0 128.0 137.0 95 94 Does not comply 333 100' W of W lane 25' S of Center 1 nt rf P 1nni r A-i rpnrt- Pd 7 8 8 0 131 0 137 0 95 96 Complies 334 50'..w of W lane 30' S of Center line of Palomar Airport Rd.. 6 7 8.0 127 3 137 0 95 93 Does not comply 335 300' E of E lane 25' S of Center line of Palomar Airpo rt Rd 7.9 8.0 128 5 137 0 95 94 Does not comply 336 200' E of E lane 25' S of Center linp n P1nnir A1rpnrtRd. 6.9. 8.o 121.5 137 0 95 89 Does not comply 100 E of E lane 25' 5 of Center 337 _____ line of Palomar Airport Rd. 8.2 8.0 123.7 137.0 95 5 90 Does not comply r.nT.T.F.r_F.'RT.UTh TMPPAUPMMT TEST • IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Dny. PERCENT PERCENT No. LO C AT I 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE . REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 j HJCLEARDENSITYf 338 .5' E of E lane 30' S of Center . line 6.3 8.0 .126.3. . 137.0 95 92 Does not comply of Palomar Airport Rd. 339 RETEST OF #42 8 2 8.0 131.1 137 0 95 96 RETEST OF TEST #42 Complies. 340 IETEST OF #43 7.8 8.0 130.3 137.0. 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //43 roinp4 341 IETEST OF 1/44 7.5 8.0 131.0 13.7.0 95 96; RETEST OF TEST 1/4 Complies 342 ETEST OF #45 7..8. 8.0 130.5 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST #45 Complies 343 IETEST OF #41 7 2 8.0 130.6 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST #41 Complies 344 IETEST OF //39 7.5 8.0 130.2 137.0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST 1/3 9 Complies 345 IETEST OF #37 7 2 8 0 132 0 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST #37 Complies 346 IETEST OF #36 8 1 8 0 132 1 137 0 95 95 RETEST PF TEST #36 Complies 9-18 1 ta 53+00 9 5 F C S/Bound lane 146 2 152 0 95 96 Complies 2 S. t 52+30 8' 5 F C 147 6 152 0 95 97 Complies 3 3 ta. 51+80 3' So. F..C.. . . 147.8 152.0 . 95 97 Complies 4 )ta 48+70 6' So F C 149.6- 152.0 95 98 Complies (OT.TF.aF. RT.\JT) TMPRflVFM1NT9 DA(' fl I no 0, TEST No. - ' L 0 C A T I 0 N" IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST.' IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY " PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 9-18 S Sta 47-80 5' So F C 148.7 152.0 95 98 Complies 6 310.0 uped to 325.0'- 45+50 5' So. F.C. 0646-146 94.2' ' . . 146.7 152.0 95 . .97 Complies 7 Sta 46+85 5' So F C 144.2 . 152.0 95 95 Complies 8 Sta. .46+80 5' So. F.C. 143.9 .-. 152.0 95 95' - Complies- 9 Sta 46+50 4' So F C 145.-1 152.0 95 96 Complies 10 Sta. 44+25 2 1 /2' So. F.,C.' . ' ' ' 147.9 152.0 95 - . 97 Complies 11 , Sta. 44+20 .9 1/2 So. F. C., - 149.4 '152.0 95 - 98 Complies 12 - STa. 40+37 2 1/2' So. F.C. . 147.3 152.0 - 95 97 - Complies 13 Sta. 39+82.1.' N Center Island : ,. Is . - -• .at futu , re Paloma , ' r bet . . . - . 131.8.. . 152.0 95 88 ' Does not comply 14 Sta. 39+90, +7' - , - 142.2 - 152.0 9.5 94. ' Does not 'c omply 15 + 25' 2' N Center line Island 148 4 152.0 95 98 Complies 16 Sta 40+60/2 1/2 N Center line . tglpnd 147 4 152 0 95 97 Complies 17 Stà. 40+85 Center line Island , ' 137.8 152.0 . 9'5 - 91 Does not comply 18. STa. '40+85 5' N of So. face curb . 140.6 152.0 95, 93 Does not comply 11 COT,LFcF. RT,VT) TMPPOVF.MFNTS TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dr1Y DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMAR IKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-18 RDITYONKP H A LTJ 19 So Face curb 140 3 152 0 95 92 Does not comply 20 2' No Face curb So /Face curb 137 4 152.0 95 90 Does not comply 21 4 1/2' No Face curb 14.9.1.. 152.0 95 98 Complies 22 STa 35+50 6'/2' So Face curb 151 4 152-0. 95 100 Complies 23 Sta 30+55 %' So Face curb 150 4 152.0 95 99 Complies 24 Sta 30+50 153.3 152.0 95 100+ Complies 25 On Palomar Air Port Rd W/Bnd side 7S+lfl 7 F. (enrer line 143.7 152.0 95 95 Complies' Palomar Airport Rd. Sta. 75+25 28' E Center line 26 Palomar Airport Rd 144.2 152 .,0 95 95Complies Sta 75+65 221 /2' E Center line 27 *.2 147 152.0 95 97 omp lies Palomar Airport Rd.- 28 21' E Center line Palomar Airpor 143.5 152.0 95 95 Complies 29 • 5ta 76+85 261 /2' E Centr line 143.1 152.0 95 94 )oes not comply Palomar Airport Rd. : • 30 • Sta. 77+00 22,' E Center lne • 143.4 152.0 • , 95 94 Does not comply' Palomar Airport Rd. • • , N/Bnd lane 3' E' Face curb • S 31 0+38 S 151.5 152.0 95 100 Complies COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PA( 11 1n_',a_Q7 TEST No. - L 0 CA TI 0 N' . PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST: IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX, Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL.-COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 9-18 92 L . -. . -. . 32; 0+15 15 E. Face curb i . 144.7 ; 152.0 . 95 . .95 Complies 33 0+15 5' W Center line Island 1.4.2;8 152.0 95 9.4 Does not comply 34 2+30 So./Brid -lane Center line Island 144.1 152 0 95 95 Complies 35 So /Bnd Sta 4a+40,5' W Face cur 146 7 152 0 95 97 Complies 36 Sta 4+50 15' E Face curb 147 4 152 0 95 97 Complies 37 Sta. + 450, So./Bnd lane , . . . 3 E Face curb . . . . . . . . .144.1. . 152.0 95 . . 93 . . Does not, comply. 38 ' So./Bnd ' Sta. '7+00 9' E face curb " 150.9 152.0 95 99 Complies 39 Sta. 7+10 . 6" E .. - ' ' ' 145.6 - 152.0 . 95 96 ' Complies: 40 Sta 7+30 6' W Face curb 143.16. 152 0 95 95 Complies 41 Sta 19+00 3' E Face curb 145.2 152 0 95 97 Complies 42 Sa. 19±05 5' E Face curb ' ' . . . 147.8 - 152.0' '95 - 99. Complies 43 Sta. 19+20 ' ' . .. 146.0 152.0 95 '96 - ' Complies 44 Sta. 24±50 5 1/2" E face curb' , 150.5 152.0 95 99 Complies 45 Sta '24+49 17' E Face curb . - 146.1 152.0 95 96','. Complies rflTT.P .RT.UTh TMPP11?M1?11TQ rsr O. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E .R M A K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-18 LEARDENSONASPHTT 46 STa 24+45 6' W face curb 150.4 152.0 95 99.Complies 47 S t a 28+45 4 W face curb 147 2 152.0 95 97 Complies 48 Sta 28+30 Center line lane So..144.4 15.2 .0 95 96 Complies S t a 37+50 So /Bnd lane 2' E face curb 147 7 152 0 95 97 Complies 50 STa 37+55 12' E Face curb s 146 6 152 0 95 97 Complies 9-18 NUC rKRI FrST 7 347 N/Bnd lane Sta. 52+50 6' W Face curb 5 7 4 8 0 131.3 138.0 95 95 Complies 348 N/Bnd lane Sta 48+70 61 E N/Bnd 4 7 8 0 131 0 138 0 95 95 Complies 349 lane Sta. 44+15 2' E Center line 5-1. 8.0 137 1 .138.0 95 99 Complies N/Bnd lane S t a 40+70 350 Center line 5.3 .8 .0 137 6 138 0 95 100 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 35+50 351 2' E of Face curb S 5.8 8 0:_' 128 8 138.0 95 93 Does not comply N/Bnd lane Sta 35+50 352 11' E. Face.Curb 5.0 8.0 134.0 138 0 95 97 Complies Sta 31+70 N/Bnd lane 353 4! W Face curb 6.4 S ..8.0 134 0 138.0 95 97 Complies 354 Sta. 27+60 8' E Center line 1an e S 5.0. 8.0 136 7 138.0 95 99 Complies c'ri I t'rt' T 17 TMDOTt9XtMmC TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE 'DRY MAX. Dny DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-18 (NU C LEA1DE N . . . . Sta. 27+80 15' W center line 355 lane . 4.8 8.0 .128.3 138.0 95 93 Does not.comply 356 Sta. 28+65 Center line lane'..5.3 . 8.0 135.7 138.0 95 . 98 Complies 357'Sta.- 22+50 2' W Face curb 4.5 8.0 131.8 138.0 95 96 Complies 358 STa 18+30 31/2' E Face curb 4.9 8.0 138'.0 138 0 95 100 Complies N/Bnd lane STa 14+00 I 359 3 .1/2. E Facecurb 7 1 8 0 131 ..3 138.0 - 95 95 Complies 360 N/Bnd lane Sta 9+20 center line 6.4. 8.0 132 7 138'.0 95 96 Complies 361 N/Bnd lane Sta. 4+70 1' E face curb -6.7.- 8 0 130 4 138.0 95 95 Complies 362 Run B/s 3' E of 1' E Face curb 5-.4 8.0 137 3 138.0 95 - 100 Complies For back-upinfo. . . .. 9- 119 N/Bnd lane 3' E face curb 51 144 8 152.8 95 95 Complies 52 N/Bnd lane 2' W face curb 150 ..4 152 8 95 98 Complies 53 N/Bnd lane Sea. 50+70, 4 F fi'p riirh . - . -. .146.5. . 152.8 95 96 .. Complies N/Bnd lane Sta ..'50+45 _____ 4 face curb . . . . . 148.4 . •. 152.8 . 95 . . - 97 . Complies . . . . . ('ñT I '('P 1T Un TMPPfl\T1M1TQ fl A r' t I I. TEST No. L 0 C A •I I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX: DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 N/Bnd lane 50+50 Center line 55 lane 144 6 152.8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 50+47 56 15' W face curb 145 1 152.8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd St 47+45 57 flane ace curb. 147 3 152.8 95 96 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 47+30 2' W 58 center line lane 14-5.4 152.-8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 4+50 4' E Face curb 145.0 152.8 95 95 Complies 60 N/Bnd lane Sta. 45+00 . 146.3 152.8 95 96 Complies 1/2" E Face curb 61 N/Bnd lane S t a 44+95 12 1/2' 150.0 152.8 95 98 Complies E Face curb N/Bnd lane STa 44+90 4 1/2' 62 w face curb 147 5 152 8 95 97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 40+70, W fa,ce curb - 0 148 7 _______ 152.8 95 97 Complies 64 N/Bnd lane St 40+70 f .ace curb 143.8 152.8 95 94 Does not comply 65 N/Bnd lane Sta 37+40 146 .7, 152.8 95 96 Complies 5' E face curb 66 N/Bnd lane Sta 37+45 Center line 150.0 J52.8 95 98 Complies lane 5' No Man Hole 67 N/Bnd lane 37+40 QI 148.5 152 8 95 97 Complies APP w_F uy1-, - 68 N/Bnd lane STa 31+75 144 9 152 8 95 95 Complies 2 1/2'.W fae curb - 0 C' f\ 'I 7 fl C' 'fl fl 7 TIn No. TEST IN L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP.' PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9- 19 /Bnd lane Sta 31+70 69 ' Center line lane 148.1 152 8 95 97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 26+00 7A 0 W face of curb 146.5 152'.8 95 96 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 26+05 71 ' ' 6' W face of curb :157.9 152.8 ' "9-5 99 ' Complies 72 N/Bnd lane Sta.- 26+00' ' ' 'Now ' 14' E face curb ' , 148.1 152.8 95 97 , Complies N/Bnd lane Sta.' 18+30 73 5 1/2' W face curb 146 6 152 8 95 96 Complies 7-4 N/Bnd lane Sta. 18+3 . ' '' 148.3 152.8 95 ' 97 ' Complies 1,4 1/2' W face curb- 175 N/Bnd lane Sta.'.1.4+00.1 149 6 152 0 95 98 Complies 11' W face of curb N/Bnd lane Sta 14+11 76 2 1/2' W face of curb 145 4 152 0 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 8+60 77 3' W face of 'curb ' 148.3. 152.0 95 97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta.- 8+55 -- 78 3'--E face of curb. ' . 143.7 152.0 95. 94 Does not comply 79 N/Bnd lane Sta 4+25 151 0 152.1 0 95 99 Complies 3' W face of curb 80 N/Bnd lane Sta 4+00 144 ..13 152 0 95 95 Complies 2 1/2' E face of curb S/Bnd lane STa 3+50 81 5 1/2' E face of curb 152.0 152A 95 100 Complies 82 113' S/Bnd lane Sta. 7 3+50 . 147-. 9 152.8 95 97 Complies _____ 'E face' of curb -- 1'IT T t'f't' TT7Th TDTtqVKT'T'C' TEST No. - -. L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAx. Day . DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE, R E M A R K S MOIST, DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 8 3 S/Bnd lane Sta.8 7+00 11' E 143.9 152 95 94 Does not comply face of curb 84 SIB.nd 1-ane Sta. .7+05. . . 6 1/2' E face of curb. .'. -146.7 . 152.8 95 96 -Complies 85 S/Bnd lane STa. 40±25. . 7' E face of. curb . . 148.9 -152.8 95 . 98 Complies .. S/Bnd lane Sta. 37+00 86 9' E face of curb '146.. 152.8 95 96 Complies 87 S/Bnd lane Sta. 30+59 . ' 3 1/2 E face-of curb - . . 145.7 152.8 95 95 Complies 88 S/Bnd lane sta 24+55 147 7 152 8 Complies 95 97 3 1/2 ' E face of curb 89 S/Bnd lane STa. 24±50 .. . . . 13' E face of curb 145 7 152.8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 19+10 90 2'.E face of curb 146.9 152A 95 96 Complies 91 S/Bnd lane Sta. 18±50 9 1/2''Eface curb. 145 9 152 8 95 96 Complies 92 S/Bnd lane Sta 14+55 . . . -. . . 13 1/2'1?_f rlf_curb 145 5 152.8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 15+00. ... . . . . . .147.6 152. 8 . 95 97 .Com.plies 9 1/2'E_face_ofcurb . S/Bnd lane Std. 15+50 94 2' Eface of curb . . . . 144 6 1,52 .8 . 95 ._. 95 Complies 95 S/Bnd lane Sta 14±00 7lF_F,c'eo f eiir h 145.8 152.8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane STa. 10+48 96 2' E Face of curb 146.4 152.8 95 96 Complies ('ET T LIfIV n T TT1\ T 11,nn yi,,r.,,q'e. TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE V DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE V R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY V REQUIRED COMP., 9-19 N URDE S/Bnd lane S t a 10+00 12 112 E face of curb V V V 147 0 V 152 8 95 V 96 V Complies 98 S/Bnd lane S t a 10+25 8 1/2 E face ,of curb - 147 9 152 8 95 97 Complies 99 N/Bnd lane Sta 15+00 V V V V 5' E face of curb - V 148.0 152.8 - 95 97 V Complies V N/Bnd lane STa 15+10 100 Center line lane V - V 152 0 - 152 8 - 95 100 Complies V S/Bnd laneV Sta. 51+85. 101 4' E face of curb 143 7 152 8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane 51+80 102 9 1/2 E face of curb 146.3 - '152.8 95 96 Complies S/Bnd lane 51+90 103 5 1 /2' W face of curb 145.5 152 8 95 96 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 51+80 104 V 2 W face of curb V V V V 144 7 152 8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane STa 51+00 105 .136.5. 150.0 ' 95 90 Does not comply, 106 STa 50 50 5' W face of curb 137 0 150.0 95 91 Does not comply 107 Sta 50+50 10' W face of curb 139 7 150 0 95 93 Does not comply 108 At SDG&E sign H P gas line 5 1/2 'W face of curb 144.8 150.0 95 97 Complies 109 At SDEG sign H P gas line 142 ..2 15,0 .0 95 95 Complies g 1/7' 14 fit'c nf etirh 110 Sta. 44+75 .71/2 W face of curb 143 4 150.0 95 95 Complies COLLEGE BLVD . IMPROVEMENT.S PAGE. 18 10-29-87 TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST, OPTIMUM - MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 .101=_E A ~R_.!~UN S IT YO 111 N/Bnd E sect of cap approximately . . . 146.0 . 152.0 . 95 96 Complies Sta. 53+00 6 W Face of curb . . . . 112 N/Bnd Sta. 39+00,13 1 W. face curb . .143.9 -15.2.0 . 95 . 95 C.orn'plies 113 N/Bnd Sta. 32+00 12'-W face curb 142.5 150.0 , 95 95 . Complies 114 N/BNd Sta 29+45 5 1/2' W face curb - 14-3.0' 150.0 95 95 Complies 115. N/Bnd Sta. 25+50 5' W face curb . . 145.7 - 152.0 . 95 96 - Complies 116 N/Bnd Sta. 20+50 4' W face curb 148.3 152.0 95 . . 98 Complies 117 S /Bnd lane Sta 47+60 5 E face of curb 145.3 152 0 95 96 Complies 118 S/Bnd lane STa 41±15. Center line lane - - . 148.2. 152.0 95 - 98 Complies 119 S/Bnd lane STa. 47+65 , - W face of curb - 5 . . . . . 145.2 . 152.0 . .95 . 96 Complies 120 S/Bnd lane Sta.. 42+53.. 2-1/2'- E face of curb . . . 144.7 152.0 95 95 Complies Sfnd lane Sta 42+50 121 - - 13 E face of curb- 150 1 .152.0 95 99 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 42+25 122 144.2 152 0 95 95 Complies 123 S/Bnd lane Sta. 39+00 . . . . 7' W face of curb 143.4 152.0 95 . 94 Does not comply- - 124 _____ S/.Bnd lane Sta 37+45 - - 11 1/2 W face of curb . -149.5 152.0 95 98 Complies (11T.T.(2P RT.Ufl TMPP01T1'MMT' TEST. LOCATION* IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. N PLACE DRY MAX. Dn DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 125 S/Bnd lane Sta'. 37±30 .. 31 W face of curb 147.3 152.0 95 97 Complies 12.6 S/Bnd lane Sta. 37+5 1-45.4 152.0 95 96 . Complies 127 S/Bnd lane Sta. 28+00 . 155.0 152.0 95 100+ Complies 128 S/Bnd lane Sta 28+00 15' Face of b .. cur 152.2 152.0 95 100 Complies 1.29 S/Bnd lane Sta. 28+20 1 W Face of curb Ithland (CNRB) . . 144.2 152.0 . 95 95 Complies 130 S./Bnd lane S ta. 28+83 - . . ,. 13' W face of cutb . 147.3 152.0 97 Complies 131 Sta 22+80 7' W face of curb 148.7 152;0 95 -. 98 Complies 132 Sta 19+05 10 W face of curb 147.0 152.0 95 97 Complies 133 Sta 18+90 3' W face of curb 144.5 - 152.0 95 95 Complies 134 Sta 18+50 7' W face of curb 147.2 152.0 95 97 Complies 135 S /Bnd lane Sta 14+50 4' W face of curb 146 152.0 95 97 Complies 136 S/Bnd lane Sta. 7+00 -. - . S t W f;;rp of r,irh' . 146.2 152.0 .95 96 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 6+80 . 1 7 . 12' W face of curb .. 147 0 152 0 95 97 Complies 1 8 S/Bnd lane Sta. 32+50 . 3' W face of curb . . .. . . 144.7 152.0 9.5. 95 . Complies COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS P A av )fl 1fl...90_7 TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DrlY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE - R E M A R KS MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 1NST1YO FTKS HA1JT S/Bnd lane Sta. 3+00 . . - ________ ________ _______________________ 139 14' W face of curb . .149.6 .• 152.0 95 98 Complies 140 Check out left turnpocket w/Kirt C. area not compacted-ranged . . 13.9 152.0 95 . 90 Does not comply from 85-93 . . . .. . 141 Sta. 33+00 4' W face of curb . 140.7 - 152.0 95 92 Does not comply 142 Sta. 30t5 8'-w . left turnpocket 136.9 152.0 95 90 Doe not comply 143 Sta. 30+45 8' W left turn pocket . 136.4 152.0.- . 95 90 . Does not comply 144 Sta. 30+50 2' W face, of curb - 129.3 152.0 95 85 Does not comply J ft turn pocket . .. . - Sta. 30+50 7' W face of curb 145 left turnpocket 1359 152.0 95 89 Does not comply STa. 32+50 6' W face of curb - 146 1eF t, f iirrpn.kf 139.5- 152.0 95 92 Does not comply STa. 33+94 5' W face of ctirb 147 left turnDocket - 141.0 152.0 95 93. Does not comply 9-24 CLEAR PNS5TT 363 Sidewalk *W side Center line - 11.9 14.0 1110 116.5 90 95. Complies 41+75 . - Sidewalk W side Center line 364 . - . Sta.. 45+50 11.7 14.0 110.4 116.5 - .90 95 Complies 3.65 Sidewalk W side Center -line STa. 49+00. 12.6 14.0 108.0 116.5 90 93 Complies - C(T.T.7t21 TT.Ufl TMPPI1?MPMTc TEST - L 0 C A T1 0 N IN .PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT * RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY ' REQUIRED COMP. 9-24 Sidewalk W side Center line 366 Sta. 51+75, 9.5 .14 .0 .112.0 .'11-6.5 90 96 Complies 9/ .. . . ' . . All tests are retests of test's ;:taken 9-21-87 College Blvd. left t,urn Re-A lane CL of Lane 230'N of CL ' 146. ' 152.5 95 96 Complies RETEST A Re-B College Blvd.' Left turn CL ' 120' N of-CL P.A.R. , . 46.8 152.5 95 96 Complies RETEST B Palomar airport rd. left turn lane 100'W of CL ' 1375 ..complyRe-C 152 . 90 Doe,s not comply retest C Palomar airport rd.' left Re-D turn 100' W of CL college blvd..- '144.3 152.5 Complies RETEST D Palomar airport rd. tight Re-E turn lane 230' E of CL ' 143.1 152.5 95 94 Does not comply ' retest E Palomar airport rd. rt. lane ' Re-F 120' E of CL collegè blvd. 148.4 152.5 95 97 ' Complies RETEST F 38'S of. CL Palomar airport . - Re.Rd. CL of college b-lvd. ' ' ' 140 6 152.5 95 92 Does not comply 'RETEST G 9/25 (MUCULEAR NS I RADE Sidewalk E s'ide' College Blvd. . 367 Centerline Sta. 42+00 , 9.3 14.0 100.1 116:5 90 86 DOes not comply Sidewalk ,E side College Blvd..10.1 Centerline 39+50 36 8 14.0 100.1' 116.5 90 86 Does not comply 369 Sidewalk E. side College Blvd. Center line 36+.00 9.2 14.0 1 100.1 116.5 90 86 Does not comply COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 22 .. 11-6-87 EST 10. -r A 0 N '. IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DrY - DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE - REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9/2 Sidewalk E side College blvd 370 centerline 31+00 T. 2 14.0 103 4 116.5 90 89 Does not comply 371 Sidewalk E. side College Blvd. 9.8 14.0 103.0 116.5 90 88 Does nOt comply Cent Center 26+00 - 372 Sidewalk E side College Blvd 10.8 14 . 0 97 3 116.5 90 84 Does not comply Centerline 22+00 9/3 37+00 Median 9.0 11.0 107 7 116.5 90 92 Complies 373. 374 32+00 Median . .8.7 . .11.0 107.4 116.5 90 92 '. Complies 375 34+00 Median 9 2 11 0 108.8 116.5 90 -_ 93 Complies -- Median Sta. 23+50 15.9 14.0 105.4 116.5 - 90 90 Complies 376 377 Median Sta 19+10 13.8 14.0 105.5 116.5 90 91 Complies 378 Median Sta 14+10 10.8 14.0 107 6 116 5 90 92 Complies 379 Median Sta 9+50 14 0 14 0 110 1 116.5 90 94 Complies 380 College blvd 8' N of centerline 20 1 14 A 106.8 117.5 90 91 Complies 55+00 N lane 6' .N of center line C011ege blvd.. 10' Sof centerline 19.2 14.0 - 108.1 117.5 90 92 . Complies- 38 1 58+00 N lane 12' S of centerline 382 College blvd 4' N of centerline 7 6 14.0 117 8 117.5 90 100 Complies 61+00 N lane class II base S . . . 383 College blvd. 19' N of centerline 64+00 N lane area pumping slightl 20.9 S 14.0 104.3 - . 117.5 90 89 - Does not comply 384 College blvd area around MH need3 19.0 14.0 107 4 117.5 90 91 Complies compaction66+00 N lane 11'Sof MH ______ 1. COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 23 1'1-6-87 rEsT 0. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE - DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE. REMARK S MOIST. DENSITY - REQUIRED COMP. 0/21 College blvd. area around MH 16.3 14.0 107.2 117.5 90 91 Complies 385 ,needs compaction 69+00 MH 10 W o MH 8' N of centerline N lane 386 S. lane 1251 -W of faraday Inters 19.1 14.0 106.1 . 117.5 90 90 Complies College blvd. Slane MH in center 387 of Rd.wy66+OOSlane 14'N of C.L. 15.5 1,4.0 1,10.0 110.6 90 '94 Complies 388 College blvd. MH 63+00 S lane 10' 16.3 14.0 110.6 117.5 90 94 Complies S of Center line 389 College blvd. MH 60+00 S lane 17.9 14.0 106.4 117.5 90 91 Complies 10'W of centerline - 390 College blvd. MH 56+00 S lane 21.8 14.0 104.7 .117.5 90 89 Does not comply area around MH need compaction 391° College blvd, 50' E of Intersecti 11 16.7 14.0 106.9 117.5 90 ' 91 Complies S lane 10' S of centerline ______ ________ ________ . . ________ - 380A.Retest 380 Sta. 55+00 16.6 14.0 107.9 117.5 90 93 Retest // Complies '380 Retest II Retest 383 Sta. 64+00 20.3 14.0 106.1 117.5 90 90 Complies 383 383A , 384A Retest 384 Sta. 384 , 18.6 14.0 - 108.2 117.5 90 92 Re ' Complies est II 384 385A 8 Sta 5 6 +00 5 Retest , 17.7 14.0 109.6 117.5 - 90 93 5 Retest / - 'Complies 385 386A Retest 386 125' S of Faraday 20.7 14.0 107.0 117.5 90 .91 Compl i.es Retes t // 386 389A Retest 389 60+00 17.8 14.0 107.2 117.5 '90 ' 91 Complies ' 389 Retest 390 Sta. 56+00 , 17.7 14.0 109.6 117.5 90 93 Complies Retest II 390A 390 Retest // 391i' Retest' 3.91 50' N of. intersect. 15.2 14.0 109.1 117.5 ' '90 93 - Complies Sta. 53+75 - . ______ S S - . - College Blvd. Improvements Page 24. 11/9/87 TEST I.o. L 0 C A T 10 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. On',' DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP.. 10/22 College Blvd 69+20 20' N of MH 1.5.5- 14 0 113 0 117 5 90 93 Complies 392 E lane 10'W centerline CB 72+00 E lane 6' E centerlin 17 9 14 0 109.1 117 5 90 93 Complies 393 CB 75+00 E lane 8' W centerline 19 5 19.5 107 9 117.5. 90 92 Complies CB 78+00 E lane 7 E centerline 18.8 18 8 104 8 117.5 90 89 Complies 395 396 College Blvd 82+50 E lane 13 8 14.0 109.4 117.5. 90 93 Complies 397 College Blvd 84+50 E lane 21.3 14'.0 101 9 117.5 90 87 Does not comply 398 College Blvd 84+00 W lane 21.2 14.0 10,4 .5 117.5 90 89 Does not comply 399 College Blvd 81+00 W lane 18.7 .14.0. 106.7 117.5 90 91 Complies 400 College Blvd 77+00 W lane 13 4 14 0 110.2 117.5 90 94 Complies 401 College Blvd 73+50 W lane 20.2 14.0 115.1 117.5 90 98 Complies 402 College Blvd 70+50 West lane 15.0 14-.0 '109.9 117.5 90 94 Complies 403 College Blvd SBRM Sewer W of 9 4 11 5 108 .6 , 119-2 90 91 Complies Palomar airport rd. 50'Wof E rd. S 404 CB S BRM Sewer -W of palomar airport rd 35' W of E rd 12'W of MH TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIE) Reviewed by: IhR Kirk P. /jmiennan North County Branch Manager 3V flIJ Testing Engineers—San Diego I A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 S(IA11 It\\%V, Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619) 225jCE 2956 Industry Street, 'Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-OT DATE OF TEST 10/23/87' FILE No. 087-527 LAB. No 25.9 DAILY 'RESULTS - IN PLACE 'DENSITY TESSTICIPI PROJECTS Ca rlsba d, 'CA DIVISION LOCATION PROJECT College blvd. Improvements DATE OF REPORT November 18,1987C0NTRACT0R ' rEsT IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Dv PERCENT PERCENT No L 0 C A TI 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY ' REQUIRED COMP. 10/23 NUCLEAR'DENSITY: 396A 'Retest of 1/396 Stat. 78+00 E. 18.5 14.0 . 105.7 117.5 90 ' 90 Retest //396 Complies Lane 7'E Centerline F.G. Subbase . 98A Retest of II 398 84+50 E. Lane ' 17.3 ' 14.0 1.05.7 . _17 _5 1. 90 90 Retest /1398 Complies F.G. Subbase Retest #399 84+00 W. Lane ' ' ' ' Retest, //399 399A Finish Grade Subbase , 17.8 14.0 105.9 117.5 90 90 . Complies L - 0/24 NU CLEAR DENSITY:' College Blvd. E Bo'und Stat. 65+5 ' ' 05 e-12 Finish Sub Base 4.8 7.0 131.4 . ' 139.0 95 , 95 Complies Stat.63+00e 1211 Finish SubBase O6 5.1 7.0. 131 7 1390 95 95 Complies 07 Stt. e 59+50e 1211 Finish Sub base , `7.0 ' 132.0 139.0 95 95 Complies 08 Stat 54+50 83e 1211 Finish Sub 5.4 7.0 1316 139 0 95 95 Complies Base 1+09 Stat 56+00 e-12" Finish Sub Base 5 8 7.0 137-9 1390 95 95 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 1I/18/8 " . Page 2 EST 0. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 10/2/' NUCLEAR DENSITY: S College Blvd. W. bound Stat. 59+ 00. e-12' Finish Sub Base '70 131.3 139.0 95, 95 Complies 411 Stat. 64+00 e-12" Finish Sub 5.1 7.0 Base 131.4 139.0 95 . 95 Complies 412 Stat 67+98 e-12" Finish Sub 5.3 7 0 .131.6 139.0 95 95 Complies 413 S.G. on College Blvd E Bound 17.6. 14.0 113.7 117.0- 90 97 Complies 414 Stat. 91+00 'e Finish Subbase 15.8' i4.0 . ' 112.7 117.0 90 . 96 ' Cdmplis 415 Stat e 95+50 e Finish Subbase 15.0'-14.0 108.3. 117.0 90 - 93 Complies 416 Stat. 98+50 e Finish Subbase 15 14.0 107.1 ' 1170 90 . 92. ' Complies 417 Stat 98+00 e Finish Sub base 15'.0 14.0 108.3 117.0 90 93 Complies 418 Stat 94+00 e Finish Sub base 16.4 14.0 107.5 117 0 90 92 Complies 419 ' Stat. 88+10 e Finish Sub base 16.8 14.0 .112.4 117.0 90 96 Complies 420 Stat 84+50e Finish Sub base 16.6 14.0 109-'0 117 0 90 93 Complies 0/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY 421 College Blvd East Lane Stat 6 1 7 0 54 +50 129 0 139 0 95 93 Does not comply 422 College Blvd W Lane Stat 57+70 7.0 7.0 .126.3 139.0 95 91 Does not comply COLLEGE BLVD. 'IMPROVEMENTS 1 1/18 •. Page 3 TEST No L 0 A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY -DENsITy MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 0/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY 423 College Blvd W lane Stat 57+50 5.4 7 0 128 5 139 0 95 92 does not comply 424 College Blvd. W. lane Stat 7+50 .2 7.0 .126:4 139.0 95 91 'Does' not comply 425 College Blvd W lane Stat 63+50 7.3 7.0 ' 132.7 139.0 95 96 Comolies 426 College Blvd W lane 66+50 5 0 7 0 128 5 139.-0 95 92 T)oe q not comply 427 College Blvd W lane 69+0 5.4 7 0 127 0 139.0 95 91 Does not comply 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY 428 College Blvd. E. Lane 70+50 7.2, 7:0 130.1 139.0 95 .94 Does not comply 429 College Blvd'. E.' Lane 73+50 6.3. 7.0 ,' 130.1 139.0 95 94Does not comply 430 College Blvd. E. Lane 76±50 5.9 7.0 , 130. 139.0 95 94 Does not comply 431 College Blvd ...E:. lane 79+50 7 9 .7.0. 130.3 139 0 95 89 Does not comply 432 College Blvd E lane 82+50 5.9 7 0 127 4 139 0 95 92 Does not comply 433 C611ege Blvd E lane 84+00 -'5.9 T.0 131.5 139.-0 95 95 Complies ..434 College Blvd W Lane 84+60 5.6 7 0 129 7 139.0 95 93Does not comply 435 [College Blvd. W'. Lane 82+50 , 5.0 ' 7.0 130.8 139.0 95 94 ' Does not comply COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS TEST NO L 0 CA TI 0 N . IN PLACE: OPTIMUM . 'MOIST.*,... IN PLACE DRY MAX DnY DENSITY. PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MoisT,DENSITY . REQUIRED. COMP. 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY - College Blvd W Lane 79+501- 436 6.2 7 0 124 2 139 0 95 89 Does not comply 437 College Blvd W Lane 76+50 5 0 7 0 .120.4 139 0 95 87 Does not comply 438 College Blvd W lane 73+50 5.4 .7 .0 124 7 139.0 95 90 Does not comPlY. College Blvd W lane 70+56 5 0 7 0 126 7 139 0 95 91 Does not comply Median 57+00 Finish Subgrae 440 17 6 16.5 102 6 11-1.0 90 92 Complies 441 Median 60+00 Finish Subgrade 16.8 16.5 987 111.0 90 . 9 Does not comply - 442 Median 63+00 Finish Subgrade 14 ..6 16 5 103 0 111 0 90 93 C.p1ie Median 66+75 Finish Subgrade 12.3 16 5 105.9 1.11 .0 90 95 Complies 444 Median 73+00 Finish Subgrade 11.7 14.0 103 1 116.5 90 89 L'os not comply Median 76+00 Finish Subgrade 10.8 14.'0', 109'.5 116.5 90 94 Complies 446 Median 80+00 Finish Subgrade 19.6 16 5 93 7 111.0 90 84 Does not comply 447 Median 82+00 Finish Subgrade 1'8.6 16.5 101.1% 111.-0 90 91 Complies 448 Median 87+00 Finish Subgrade 11 9 16 5 103 3 111 0 90 93 Complies 449 Median 90+00 Finish Subgrade 15 8 16 5 105 4 111 0 90 95 Complies I COLLEGE. BLVD.. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 5 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY: .450 Medain 92+00 Tinish Subgrade 17 .1-6.5 105.7- '11-1.0'. 90 95 Complies 451 Median 95+00 Finish Subgrade 1.4 .1 16.5 107 1 111 0 90 97 Complies 10/2.7 NUCLEARDENSITY: . . . 2.1.A College blvd. E. lane 54+50 Retest of 421 7.9 7.0 132:5 139.0 95 95 Complies College blvd. E. lane 57+OQ 452 w of centerline 6 6 7.0 . . 134.3 . 139.0 95 97 Complies . College blvd. E lane Stat. 60+00 6.0 7.0 126.6 139.0 . 95 . 91 Does not comply . 8' E of centerline College blvd E lane 63+00 9 6.3 7.0 127 2 135.0 95 92 S S W of centerline , S D..s not comply. College blvd E lane 66+00 1O'E 6 1 7 0 130.9 139 0 95 94 Does not comply centerline S. College blvd. E. lane 66+00 20' 456 W o.f centerline 6.4 7.0 132.3 139.0 95 95 . Complies 422A College blvd. Retest of #.4 22 6.9 7.0 129.6 139.0 95 . 93 Does not comply W lane 54+50 423A College blvd. Retest of 1/ 423 .6.0 7.0 129.8 139.0 95 93 Does not comply W. lane 57+50 College b lvd.Retest of 1/424 424A 7 .7 .0 131.3 139 0 95 94 Does not comply 426A College blvd. Retes of 1/426 5.0 .7.0 132.1 139.0 95 ' '95 Complies 66+50 . 427A College blvd. Retest of #427 . 7.6 7.0 1.31.0 , 139.0 95 . 94 , Does not comply 69+00 ' . H COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 6 TEST No LO C A T 10 N' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Day DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R EMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/2 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . . . . . 453A College blvd. Retest of 53 Stat 60+00 . 55 7.0 134.1 139.0 95 97 Complies'etest of 453 454A College blvd. Retest of //.454 Stat. 63+00 E lane 53 7.0 .134.5 139.0 95 . 97 Complies Retest of ' . 454 55A . College blvd. Retest of 455 6.9 7.0 132.7. 139.0 95 96 Complies Retest of 66+00 E. lane' ______ .________ //455 422B College blvd. Retest 422A ' . ' . Retest of 54+50 W lane .6.4 , 7.0, "13.4 139.0 95 96 Complies // 422A 423B College blvd. Retest 423A ' Retest o. Stat. 57+50 W lane 6.5. 7.0 ' 133.4 139.0 95 96 Complies // 423A '24B Collage Blvd. Retestof 424A 5 2 7.0 134.3 139.0 95 97 Complies Retest of ' . Stat. 60+50 W lane' . . . . // 424A 27B College blvd. Retest of /1 427A Stat. 69+00 W. lane 5.3 7.0 ' 133.9 139.0 , 95 ' 96 , Complies Retest of # 427A '28A College blvd. Retest of #428 5.3 7.0 131.8. 139.0 95 95 Complies Retest of Stat. 70+50 E. lane ' 1/ 428 29A College blvd. Retest of 11429 Stat. 70+50 5.4 7.0 . 128.9 139.0' 95 . 93 Does not comp'l . . Retest of1/429 30A College blvd.. Retest of #,430 , 5.4 7.0 . 126.5 ' 139.0 95 Does not comply 7)6+50 E. lane . 31A College Blvd. Retest of #432 .5.4 7.0 127.6 ' 139.0. .' 95 .. Retestof_//4 Stat. 79+50 E. lane __, , , 92 Dbès not comply ' Retestof//431 32A College blvd. Retest of //432 5.5 7.0 131.3 139.0 95 ' 94 ' Does not comply Stat.'82+50E'.lane ' '433A College blvd. Retest of 433 , . Retest of//432 Stat.'84+0,0E.Lane ' 6.0 ' 7 '0 122.9 ' ' 139.0. 95 , 88 Does not comply ' Retest of//433 . COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 7 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N• IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DflY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP . REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE CON,'. REMARKS 10/30 NUCLEAR DENSITY 451 College blvd E lane Stat 60+ 00 7 3 138.3 140.6 95 98 Complies 458 College blvd E lane 63+00 5 5 7 3 138 1 140 6 95 98 Complies Collegeblvd E lane Stat 5 1 7 3 136 6 140.6 95 97 Complies 460 College Blvd. E. lane Stt. 68+70 6.0 7.3 13,6.1 140.6 95 97 Complies TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY KirkP. Aiiunman North CountyBranch Manager Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 1r -) 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248. DATE Or TEST 11./34/87 FILE No_5259 LAB. No 087-560 ... S .... DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS .5. 0T1O gar1sbad-0011ege Blvd- PROJECT Cnllge R yd Impoiemonts DATE OF REPORT 1 9 .4 v n.4 R 7 ' CONTRACTOR TEST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE . DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE . REMARKS O . . MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. College Blvd E -lane . . . . RETEST II 428A 428B RETEST II 428A 74. 7.3 130.6 141.0 95 93 T)npq nn comply College blvd E lane . . . RETEST II 429A 429B RETEST #429A . 73. .73 128.7 141 .0 95 92 Does not comply College blvd E lane . . .. . . S RETEST ii 430A 430B RETEST #430A . . 7.2 7.3 132.9 140.0 95 95 . . Complies College blvd E lane - RETEST II 431A 431BRETEST #431A . .8.1 7.3 129.2 . . 141.0 95 92 Does not comply College blvd E lane RETEST II 432A 432B RETEST.. 11432A 7.1 7.3 128.3 141.0 95 .91 Does not comply College blvd E lane . . . . . . . . RETEST/I 433A 433B RETEST //433A 7.2 7.3 132.8 141.0 95 94 Does not comply 478 College blvd 85+00: E lane 6.8 7.3 . 12.8.1 141.0 95 91 . Does not comply 479 College blvd'.88+00 E lane 7 0 7 3 131.5 141.0 95 94 Does not comply 480 College blvd 91+00 E lane 7 1 7 3 130.1 .141.0 95 93 Does not comply 481 College blvd 94+00. Elane, 6.1 - 7.3 130.4 141.0 -95 93 Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA.DERIVEO FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. .r ! rr11 c, Blvd Tmnrnvmnrc ' ' 0 , . ' Page 2. TEST - L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY " DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE : R E M A R KS No.MOIST. DENSITY 0 REQUIRED COMP. - 482 'College blvd 96+00: E. lane 6.8 . 7.3 124.5 141.0 95 89 Does not comply 483 College blvd 98+00' E lane 7. .6 13.2.1 141.0 95, 94 Does 'not comply -. RETEST #428B 'RETEST #428B 428C College blvd 70+50 E lane 7.9 7.3 , 131.6 141.0 95 ' 94 boes not comply College blvd 76+50 E lane RETEST #429B 429C RETEST //429B 7.9 7.3 '131.5' 141.0' 95 " 94 Does not comply. 'College blvd 76+50 E lane 0 0 ' ' ' . 0 RETEST #430B 430C RETEST #430B 6 5 7 3 134.7 141.0 95 96 Complies College blvd 79+50 E lane . 0 0 ' . . ' . '' RETEST #431B 431C RETEST #431B . ' ' 0 7•3 '7..3 131.2 141.0 ' 95 93 'Does,not comply College blvd 82+50 Elane RETEST #432B 432C RETEST #432B 0 74, 7.3 131.5 141.0' - 95 ' 94 Does'not comply College blvd 84+00 E lane , ' ' RETEST'.#433B '433C 'RETEST II 433B - 0 7.6 '7.3 134.3 141.0' 95 96 Complies' College blvd 10'E of 4 85+00' ' . , . 'RETEST #478 478A E lane RETEST #478 , 0 7•3 7.3 135.8 , 141.0'' 95 97 Complies College 'blvd 88+00 E lane ' . 0 ' 0 ' RETEST #479 479A RETEST #479 ' . 7.01 7.3, 133.6 141.0 95 - 95 ' - Complies College blvd 91+00 E lane . " 0 ' ' 0 ' - RETEST #480 480A RETEST #480 , 6.1 , 7.3 134.1 .141.0 95 95 Complies College blvd 94+00 E 'lane 0 RETEST '#481 481A RETEST #481 ' 6.9 7.3 .135.0 141.0 95 96 , Complies',' College blvd 96+00 E lane RETEST #482 482A RETEST #482 ' ' ' 6.9 . 7.3 135.1 , 141.0 95 , 96 Complies College blvd 98+00 E lane RETEST #483 483A 0 RETEST #483 74 7.3 1 135.3 1 141.0 95 96 Complies , College blvd 70+50 E lane 0 ' RETEST #4.28C - 428D RETEST #428C ' 8.'6 ,, 7.3 136.9 1-41.0 95 , , 97 . Complies r,s11ô- Riud Tmrrcvpm&iits Page 3 TEST 0. - L 0 C A T I 0 N .• IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY - DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 429D ol1ege blvd 73+50 E lane RETEST #429C 8.0--j . . 7.3 134.8 141.0 95 95 RETEST//429C Complies 431D College blvd 79+50 E lane RETEST # 431C 6.3 7.3 134.7 141.0 95 . 96 RETEST 1/431C Complies 432D College blvd 82+59 E lane RETEST #432C 7.0 7.3 133.5 141.0 95 95 RETEST 1/432C Complies 484 College blvd 70+00 W lane -- 6.4 7.3 130.9 1410 95 93 Does not comply 485 College blvd 73+00 W lane 6.1 7.3 130.6 141.0 95 93 Does not c0mp1• 386 College blvd 76+00 W lane 5.1 7.3 128.3 141.0 95 91 Does not comply 484A College blvd 70+00::w:lane RETEST #484 6.3 7.3 135.7 . 141.0 95 96 RETEST #484 Complies 485A College blvd 73+00 W lane RETEST #485 6.1 7.3 133.9 . 141.0 95 . 95 RETEST #485 Complies 486A College blvd 76+00 W lane RETEST 1/486 6.2 7.3 131.0 141.0 . 95 . 93 RETEST #486 Does not comply 487 College blvd 79+00 W lan.e 7.2 7.3 135.2 141.0 95 96. Complies 488 College blvd 81+00 W lane 5.9 7.3. 134.1 141.0 95 95 Complies 489 College blvd 84+00 W lane 5.8 7.3 137.6 141.0 95 98 Complies 490 College blvd 87+00 W lane 6.3 7.3 126.7 141.0 . 95 90 Doesñot comply TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Attn: Pat Entezari 1) NBS/Lowry Attn: Kurt Gierlich 10920 Via Frontera P.O. Box 28100 - - Steven P. North County Branch Manager -.. .' ( JI Testing Engineers-San Diego I#A mi Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 - 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY; TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/11-14/87 LOCATION Carl shad FILE No. 5259 PROJECT College blvd improvements LAB. No. 027-572 DATE or REPORT 12/11/87 . CONTRACTOR TEST No . L 0 C A T I 0 N . IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R EMARKS 490C College blvd W lane 87+00 RETEST #490R 9 7 3 133 5 141 0 95 95 RETEST #490B Complies 492B College blvd W lane 93+00 RETEST #492A 5 7 -,,.:7.'3 135 5 141.0 95 96 RETEST #492A Complies 493B College blvd W lane 96+00 RETEST #.493A . , . 5.6 7.3 133.8 141.0 95' 95 RETEST #493A Complies 494B College blvd.W lane 98+00. . RETEST # 494A . . 5.3 7.3 135.2 . 141.0 .. 95 ' 96.. RETEST4494A Complies 495 College blvd 70+25 1 E lane 91 E of CL 6.0 7.3 - 134.0 141-0 95 95 Cnmpliec 496 College blvd 73+)) E lane 6'E of CL 6.1 7.3' 135.3 . 141.0 95 96 Complies 497 College blvd 79+00 E lane .10'W of CL .6 .5 7.3 .136.7 141.0 95 97 Complies 498 College blvd 79+00 E lane 81 E of CL 5.5 7.3 135.6 141.0 96 _. Complies. 499 College blvd 82+00E lane lOWofCL 7.7. 7.3 138.0 .141.0 95 98 Complies 500 College blvd 84+00_Elane _71 EofCL 7.7 7.3 133.6 141.0. 95 95 Comolies THE ABOVE TEST, RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY 'TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO: FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES., THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. - - IN PLACE - MOIST. - OPTIMUM - MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. -DRY DENSITY . - PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. - . 6.4 7.3 . 137.3 141.0 95 98 - - ± 5.7 73 -. 136.3 141.0 - 95 - 97 -, -. 6.6 - .7.3 138.2 141.0 95 98 - - - 6.9 ..7 .3.134.3 141-0 AS g - - 5.8 - 73 1 134.9 1 141.0 95 96 6.2 -73- 135.7- 14 - 97 - REMARKS College blvd improvements TIEST LOCATION .11-14 501 College blvd 85+00 E lane 502 College blvd 88+00.E lane 503 College blvd 91+00 E lane -. 504 College blvd93+00E lane 505 College b1vd98+00E lane 506 College blvd .98+00E lane I. tc Ci tyofisb 1) . NBS/Lowry - - NEERS.SAN DIEGO County Branch Manager 1iJi Testing Engineers—San Diego 4''° - j, A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. II1rLJ. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I J. 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 .•• DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/11-14/87 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE No 5259 PROJECT _College hlvl Tmprovemnt sph1t LAB No 087-573 DATE OF REPORT 12/11/87 CONTRACTOR TEST No S L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R EMARKS 221 College 70+00 W lane Left turn lane 1423 39 153 -lb 95 _______ Dos '22 College blvd RETEST #221 146..6 95 96 nOt comply RETEST #221 Complies '23 College blvd 73+00 Left turn lane W la e 145'.(:) 153 p 95 96 Complies '24 College blvd 85+00 W lane Left turn la e 1438 153.0 95 ------------ 94 Does not comply '25 RETEST #224 College blvd 88+00 W lane left tu'n la e _145 153 0 153_.D 95 95 RETEST #224 Complies '26 College blvd 88+00 W lane left turn la e 1452 95 95 Complies 27 Colleg blvd 70+00 W lane 15'W of CL 152.3 1530 95 100 Complies '28 College blvd 73+00 W lane 13'W of CL 145.711 151.0 95 96 Complies '29 College blvd 76+00 10'W of CL W lane - 137.'8 153 Q. __i53.Q 95 90 Does not comply 30 Colleye'blvd W lane 79+00 12W of CL L43.11 95 94 esno comolv THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM • STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. I •t' VCr1iArIc hl,d Tmn t,mnfc L1cnh1I- D1 9 TEST No - -, L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN. PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX; DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 231 College blvd W.lane RETEST #229 144.9' 153.0... 95 95 RETEST #229 Complies - 232 College blvd i4 lane RETEST #230 V 145.0 153.0 95 -.95 RETEST #230. Complies 233 College blvd W lane 82+00 10'W of CL 150 0 153 0 i p 95 98 Complies 234 College blvd W lane 85+00 isaj. 95 100 Complies 235 College blvd 88+00 101W of CL W lane - - - - 15.1..2, 153.0 - 95 V .99 Complies 236 Collegeblvd 91+00 8'W'àf CL W lane V -146- ___ 95 97 Complies 237 - College blvd 94+00 -16'W of CL W lane 146.1 153.0 95 96 Complies 238 College blvd 97+00 11'W of CL W lane - 147.6 153.0 95- Complies 239 College blvd 70+00 CL W lane . . 145.9 - •- 153.0 - 95 96 Complies 240 College blvd 70+00 101 E CL W lane V V V 139.8 153.0 95 V 92 'Does not comply , 241 College blvd W lane 73+00 CL V V V 142.7- 1V530 95 V .94 Does not comply . 242 •- College blvd W lane 73+00.10'E CL" .. 140.8 153.0 V -92 --Does not comply 243 College blvd ,W lane .76+00 CL V V V 147.6 153.0 95 V 97 Complies 244.- College blvd Wlane 76+00CL 147.2 V 153.0 95 97 V Complies 245 College blvd W lane 79+00 121 E- CL V ______ 146.8 1 .153.0 95 96 Complies Colieoe Blvd Imorbvements. Asohalt Pci3 TEST No - L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. - '- REMARKS 246 College W lane 79+00 101E CL 1,45 .0 153 0 95 95 Complies 247 College blvd 83+00 Cl W lane 146.1 153.0 95 96 Complies 248 College blvd 83+00 10'E Cl W lane 146.3 153.01 95 96 Complies 249 College blvd 86+00 CL W lane 146.0 153.0 1 95 96 Complies 250 College blvd 86+00 WE CL W lane 141.3 153.0 95 93 Does not comply • 251 College blvd 89+00 CL W lane 145.5 153.0 95 95 Complies 252 College blvd -89+00 -9'E CL W lane 145.3 153.01 95 95 Complies 253 College blvd 92+00 CL W lane 147.0 153.0 95 96 Complies 254 College blvd 92+00 10'E CL W lane 147.3 153.0 95 97 Complies 255 College blvd 95+00 CL W lane 145.4 153 0 95 95 Complies 256 College blvd 95+00 9'E CL W lane 147 2 153 0 95 97 Complies 257 College blvd 97+00 CL W lane 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 258 College blvd 97+00 10'E Cl W lane 146.7 153.0 95 96 Complies 259 73+00 College blvd W lane RETEST- #241 145.5 153.0 -95 95 RETEST #241 Complies 260 RETEST #242 .Colleoe blvd W lane 73+00 ______ 145.2 1 153.0 95 95 RETEST #242 Complies Cn1lprtp Riud Tmnrnvpmphtc Acnhit Dnnn I! TEST No. . - LOCATIO N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M AR K'S 261 College blvd E lane 71+50 15'W of CL . 145.3 153.0 1 95 95 Complies 262 College blvd E lane 73+00 10'W of CL 145.7 153;0 95 96 Complies 263 College blvd E lane 76+00 8'W of CL 145 9 153 0 95 96 Complies 264 College .blvd -E -lane •9+00 7'W of CL . 145.8:. 153.0 95 96'. Complies - 265 College blvd 12 1 W CL 82+00 E lane . . 146.7 153.0 95 . 96 Complies . 266 College blyd 10'W CL 84+00 E lane . 145.9 153.0 - 95 96 . Complies 267 RETEST #250 ' College blvd 86+00 WE CL W lane :• ' 145.2 - . 153:0 95 . 95 RETEST #250- Complies 11-14 268 Cdlleg blvd E lane 69+00 12'E of CL '-- . '- 145'.0 153.0 95 95' Complies 269 College blvd E lane 72+00 11-'E of CL -' . - 149.5 153.0 95 - 98 Complies 270 College blvd E 1ane75+00 10'E of CL - - 147.7 - 153-.0 - 95 - 97 . Complies - - 271 College blvd E lane 78+00 WE of CL - -_- - 146.4 153.0 95 - '- 96 - -. Complies 272 - College blvd E'lane 81+00 9'E of CL . 145.0 -153.0 95 95 Complies 273 -- College blvd E lane 84+00 WE of CL - . - - '. 145.0 153.0 - 95 -- •- 95 'Complies 274 College blvd 87+00 E lane 12'E of Cl - - - -. - 138.8 153.0 95 1 91 Does not comply rnilpn6 Rlvd Tmnrnvmntc. 1cnh1t TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 275 College _'blvd 90+00E lane 10'EofCl 140.6 153.0 95 92 Doesñotcomply 276 College-blvd93+00E lane 11'EofCL 141.7. .153.0 95 93 Doesnotcomply 277 College blvd _95+00E lane 12IE _ofCl 147.3 153.0 95 97 Complies 278 Collegeblvd98+00Elane10'EofCL .145.5 153.0 95 95 Complies 276A RETEST #276 College blvd _-3+00E _lane 11 1 E CL_ 145.9 153.0 95 96 Complies 275A RETEST #275 College b1vd190+00E lane 10'E- _ofCL 148.5 153.0 - 95 97 Complies 274A RETEST #274:- Coflege blvd _E lane 87+0012'EofCl 145.3 - 153.0 95 95 Complies 279 :Collegeblvd_69+30E lane CL 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies 280 -Collegeblvd72+00ClElane 141.9 153.0 95 93'Does not comply 281 Collegeblvd _75+00E lane CL. 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 282 College blvd 78+00CLElane 145.8 .153.0 -95 96 Complies 283 College blvd 82+00 E lane CL 145.6 153.0 95 95 Complies - 284 Collegeblvd83+50ElaneCL 149.2 153.0 95 98 Complies 285 CollegeBlvd87+00 _CLElane --145.1 153.0 95 95 - Complies 286 College blvd_12'WofCL87+00Elane -145.0 1 153.0 95 1 95 Complies Colleae Blvd Imorovements. Asohalt parip 6 TEST No. . L 0 C A T 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY - DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 287 College Blvd 90+00 CL E lane 146.7 153.0 95 96 Complies 288 College blvd 90+0010'W of CL 145.1 153".0 95 95 Complies 289 College blvd 93+00 E lane CL 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 290 College blvd 93+00 E lane 10'W of CL 146.8 153.0 95 96.2. Complies 291 College blvd 96+00 E lane CL 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies 292 College blvd 96+00 E lane 12'W of CL 145.3 153.0 95 95 Complies 293 College 98+00 E lane CL 145.6 153.0 95 95 Complies 294 College 98+00 E lane 12'W of CL . 146.8 153.0 95 96 Complies 295 College 98+00 Left turn lane E lane 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 280A RETEST #280 College blvd 72+00 Elarie 145.6 153.0 95 . 95 RETEST #280 Complies, 296 College blvd 57+00.W lane 143.0 149.0 95 98 Complies 297 College 54+25 W lane.CL 134.8 153.0 95 '88 Does not comply 298 College blvd 60+00 W lane 101 E CL 133.5 149.0 95 93 Does not comply 299 College blvd 63+00 W lane 10'E CL . . 139.3 149.0 95 93 Does not comply 300 College blvd 66+00 W lane 10'E of Cl ______ 141.5 149.0 95 95 : Complies Cci1ono h1,d Tmnrn,omoni-c £tcnh11f n__.__ 7 - TEsT -No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. - OPTIMUM MOIST, IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 301 College 68+50 W lane 12'E of CL 139.2 1.49 .0 95 93 Does not comply 302 College boyd 68+50 E lane left turn laiie 136.3 .149.0 95 91 Does not comply 303 College 68+50,E lane CL 134 5 149 0 95 90 Does not 304 College boyd 68+50'8'E of CL 134.7 149.0 95 89 comply Does not comply 305 College blvd53+00 81 E of-CL Wiane 146.2 149.0 95 96 Complie's Ak 297A RETEST #297 College b1vd54+25 W lane CL - - . . - 142.0 149.0 .95 93 - RETEST #297 Does not comply 306 College blvd 57+00 9'W of CL E lane 140.1 149.0 95 94 Does not comply 307 College blvd 60+00 8'W of CL E'.-.l ane 141.11 149.0 95 95 Complies 308 College blvd 63+00 8'W of CL E lane 137.4 149/0 95 92 Does not comply 309 College blvd 66+00 left turn lane E la e 141 3 149 0 95 95 Complies 310 College blvd 68+70 left tUrn lahe E laiie 137.6 149.0 95 92 - -Complies 311 College blvd 68+70. E lane 12'W of CL 142.2 149.0 95 95 Complies 12 rt-llpe hivd 8+7fl F 1n Cl 141) 1 149-0 95 94 Doc not comply 301A College b1vd68+50 W lane left turn lan RETEST #301 142.3 149.0 95 95 Complies 313 College blvd 70+00 E lane 10'W of CL ______ 147.5 149.0 95 99 Complies TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N .. IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. - I LI REMARKS 314 College blvd 72+00 E lane 8'W of CL 143.5 149.0 L 95 96 Complies 315 College blvd 75+00 E lane 8'W of CL 143.4 149.0.. 95 96 Complies 316 College blvd 78+00 10'W of CL [ lane 1,43 .8 149 0 95 96 Complies 317 College blvd 81+00 12'W Cl E lane 142.8 149..01 -.95 96 Complies 318 College-blvd 84+)) 101 W CL E lane 143.9 149.0 95 96 Complies S 319 College blvd 87+00 121 W CL E lane 141.9 149.0 95 95 Complies 320 College blvd 90+00 10'W CL [lane 142.4 149.0 95 95 Complies 321 College blvd 93+00 9'W CL E lane 142.0 149.0 95 95 Complies 322 College blvd 95+00 E lane - . 142.1 149.0 95 95 1 Complies 323 College Blvd 97+50 CL E lane, 141.0 149.0 95 94 Does not comply 306A RETEST #306 College b1vd57+00T9'W of CL- E lane - 140.1 149.0 95 94 Does not comply 324 College blvd 70+00 [ lane 10' [ CL 142.3 149,0 95 95 Complies 325 College blvd 73+00 [ lane 11'E CL 143.2 149.0 95 96 Complies 326 College blvd 75+00 [ lane 10'ECL 143.0 1 149.0 95 96 Complies 327 College blvd 78+00 [ lane WE CL ______ 143.4 149.0 95 96 Complies - Cri1n i3.nhit- ppq TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY - PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE - COMP., R E M A R K S 328 College blvd 81+00 E lane 10'E CL 142.6. 149.0 95 96 Complies 329 College blvd 84+00 E lane 11'E CL 142 7 149 0 95 96 Complies 330 College blvd E lane 10'E CL 142A. 149.0 95 95 Complies 331 College blvd 90+00 E lane 7E CL 142.7 149.0 95 95 Complies 332 College 93+00 E lane 9'E CL 142 4 149.0 95 95 Complies College blvd 95+00 E lane 7'E CL 141.6 149.0 95 95 Complies 323A ERETEST #323 College blvd 97+50 CL E lane 142.9 149.0 95 96 RETEST #323 Complies tc r)trCibd7 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO - 1 REVIEWED BY - $teven P. Koz.H North County branch Manager Testing Engineers—San Diego .• .. ' IS A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 S 1 KurtzSt, P. Box 80985, SanDiego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 1 -=", 2956 Industry Stre'et,.Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS 1,.N,. PLACE DENSITY TESTS Car1sbad. CA DATE or TEST 11-17-87 Joe DATA FILE No.5259 Po.iccr_Coil R1 d L.AB. ro_087 - 58 9 DATE OF RE'ORT 1 2 - 1 5-8 7 CONTRACTOR . 40. EST LO C A T I 0 N . - IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. .; IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. 'DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. College Blvd S approach to. coil agIi . . S... ; •,• . . . .5 507 58'W.ofCenterline _El._Camino .4.6 .•7.3 12 7 -.`6 14 1.. C 95 .91 Does_ not .r omp ly - Real 240'S off ,Centerline Colleg College Blvd S approach to coil' --g e 50'WofCLEl __Camino Real_120'S 5_7 7_ 13_1 141_I Compli of Centerline College College Blvd S approach to Coil ge 509 20'S __of _CL _Co.11ege48'Wof..'CL' .5.2 7'.'3.' 128."3 141 . C 95 91 Does. -not 'comply t; J. Camino Real . . . . - •. ' . . . .. . . THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIO,NS CONSTITUTE THE. REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE 'BY TESTING ENGINEERS- SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR. SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. - S THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED, AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS - 510 ODUecj rre±iari 59+50 cter1mne 22.7 14.0 95 5 117.0 - 90 82 Etes rot cx31r1y 511 Cbllep naiian 66+50 centerline 15.6 14.0 100.3 jV_ 117.0 V 907 86 Does rot cJrply 512 CbUi nathan 85+00 amterline 16.8 121.1 105.2 121.0 90 87 Does rot corply 513 CoUegE nathan 93+00 16.4 12.1 105.2 121.0 90. . 87 Does rot amply 514 Cb1le rraiaan 81+75 17 3 12.1 102.1 121.0 90 84 Dces rot curply 515 GaUege rrathan 75+75 13.0 14.0 104.7 117.0 90 90 C):rrplies 507A Cb11eJE S aprcath 240'S of CL Ca1] R=#507 . 7.31 1410 51 93 DoEisVIDtCoTP.lY ftiiEsr#507 5078 coUe S 6rpto3th 240'S of CL Cl1kg iiu±' #507A 5.6 7.3 135.9 141 0 95 97 0rn1aes FEIEST #507A- 508P. G21ege B1id S apLo3th thU 50'W of CL El Caniro F1 120'S of CL ±ui #508 6.9 7.3 135.9 V 141.0 95 96 Qplies I= #508 16 C1-11eg N atzpnpxt 27'N nF creterlir Cb11 2 7-3 1-11-6 1.41--n 95 95 clrrplaes 517 Opllege N approach, 125'N of cmterLrie Cbflege 6.31 7.3 135.0 141.0 95 96 G3TpLies 509A OD11ege approach oenterline of a2lege ini #509 - 6 5 7 3 135 2 V 141 0 95 96 Cbrp1i tc - - (1) City ofc 1) /1øry i Testing Engineers—San Diego 1 S AF- A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St, p 0 Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138(619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (6.19) 757-0248 . .5 DAILY RESULTS IN' PLACE.DENSiTY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/1R/R7 A/C NUCLEAR DENSITIES LOCATION FILE No 5295 . PROJECT _(hl 1çp P1 d, Prnjcd #3188, ?-]jjo (o L.aa. No_flR7-Qfl . DATE OF REPORT 12-15-87 CONTRACTOR DRY LOCATION COMP.No. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DENSITY RLAC MOIST. EXP5TY REONJP. REQUIRED VE. REMARKS 334 .9fffl -F1_rf_tri:ir --1,53-0- 95 92 .]503 153.0 . 95 _. 98 QJTpU. 335 336 Cb]JB: to 11 . . . .. 140.5 153.0 95. 92 Does ntcxrp1y 334i'. oallege S aptO3th 250'S of CL caLlege . . imsi_#334 . . 145.0 . 153.0 95 itu±,i #334 33EA Cblleg aprc3th to mllege cmtrLre iL #336 145__1 153_0 95 95 OJTp1 _FdET#336 337 Cb11eg 240'N of caiterLre CbU N prcdi 145 4 153 0 95 95 OirpLi jes 338 CbU€gN a_iadi120'NofceiterLrCb11p 149_7 153 0 95 98 CbTpliE 339 OaLleq apO3th cbfl itr1ir . . 145.2 153.0 95 95 cbTp1i es THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING .ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING. OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. S TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO tc . . REVIEWED . BY - S •. 1) S.. 99Wn P. Nrth Qnty Brrxth C i J Testing Engineers—San Diego •'WIN A Division of United States Testing. Company, Inc: mp'll I ,- -i 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 f. / =" 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS-IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/19-25/87 A/C Nuclear Densities LOCATION ('r1chr1 FILE NO. 5295 . PROJECT CbUai _B1d.,nrojt#3188.1ticCaTIete LAB. NO._087-591 DATE OF REPoRT.........124587 . CONTRACTOR TEST No . L 0 CATION . IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM ..MOIST. IN PLACE . . 'DRY DENSITY MAX.-DRY DENSITY ' PERCENT. REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M.A R K S IP 340 69+50 W 1ari 10'W of cniter]ire 144-4 190-0 95 97 Chrph 341 72+00 W 1ae 12'W of cBiter1are 145.4 L50.0 95 97 0brp1a 342 5+00 W lare 8'W of ctnterlire ' .148.6 150.0 . 95 98 Orp1ies 343 8+00 W 8 W of citerLre 148.6 L50.0 95 100 Ctrrplies 344 R1+00 W 1jy 9 'W of cr4-pj-1 >rp _______ - _______ 146 15().0 95 cmcrpl 1 345 4+00 W Jane 8'W of cEnterl]rE '147.3 L50.0 95 99 346 19+90 5'E of 147-5 150 0 95 99 Cliiphps 347 9+50 1.5'E citerLrE 1478.0 150.0 95 99 CiTpLies 348 69+50 Left turn lane 150.0 95 98 Qip1ies 349 /2+00 121E ca-iterLr :141.8 L50.0 95 95 any THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR. JOB CONTROL : (hi icn Rix1 Prrrirt 1 AR Atha1tir ftncrete TEST NO. . L 0 C A T I 0 N . IN. PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. MO IST.REQUIRED IN PLACE DE DRY NSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL.COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 350 72+00 left tum lare .. . 145.4 142.7 150.0 95 97 Wip]J. 351 75+00 10'E caiter]Jre . - 150.0 95 96 03Tp1i 352 78+00 10'E citer1ir 146.0 150.0 95 98 oxpLies 353 81+00 12'E Cter1IE . . - 143.7 150.0 55 96 aiVies 354 84+00 10T cter1ir . . 147.4 150.0 95 99. Cmphes 355 87i-00 11'E caiter]ir .. 143.3 . 150.0 95 . 96 Wiplies 356 87+00 10'W centerline .. . 143.5 . 150.0 95 96 OJTLies 357 87-t-00 left tiiTi la -)e' 145.4 150.0 95 97 Cmplies 358. 90+00 11'W cHlteri]IE . . .. 141.9 150.0 95 . 95 aiThes 359 90+0 121E centerline .. . 135.5 150.0 95 91 Does not thTply 359A 90-i-00 12'Ecmterlire itu±sr #359 . . 142.0 150.0 95 . .95 pi-i iu±r #359 360 93+00 10'W riter1ir . . ., . . 146.0 150.0 95 98 oiThes 361 93-1-00 9'E CtE1i1 . ... ., . . . . . 144.8 150.0 95 - 97 TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE 01ST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 362 95+00 10'E cterLre 146.5 150 0 95 98 ojiplaes 363 95+00 8'W centerline 143.9 15.0 .0 95 96 GJTLies 364 97+50 9'E centerline 142.4 150.0 95 95 03Tp1aes 365 97+50 10'W centerline 143.2 150.0 95 96 GaIaLies 11-25 366 El cim xeEL 10'N of college bhd (J et of turrunz isJ.ad) 142.8 150.0 95 96 Cbrp1 367 El camro }è3]. 50'N of Gollege BM 142.4 .150.0 95 95 Ctnplaes 368 El Cmro Fb1 110'N of Coll 131.6 150.0 95 88 Does not coTply 369 College El camro r1 at the 3nterbrn of the S larE 138.4. 150.0 95 93 i rxt ctnply 370 El Croro F1 30'S of CbU 134.5 150.0 95 90 a rot cnip1y 371 El Cmiro FE31 100'S of Cb11€ge 135.9. 150.0 95 91 Does rot aJTp1y •1 372 Sartbae of Oollege 30'W of El Cmm Il 133.8 150.0 95 90 Etes rot cnrply 373 Nirth1ae of CbU 50'W of El (mro F1 ______ B8.2 L50.0 95 93 Does rot OJrply r Ji/ Testing Engineers—San Diego . A, Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St.; P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I —J •2956 Industry Street,: Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY' RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 17-1-R7 ?VC Nicleer Da sities LOCATION FILE No. 5295 , , ' PROJECT L-jjMjtjr- LAB, No._087-591 DATE OF REPORT' 17-15-87 " CONTRACTOR TEST No., L 0 C A T 10 N IN ' PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. , ' DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. OaUege Blvd. 374 CbUj blid E amroth S siiè 275'E of CL 1477 1fl'0 ' 96 ____________________________ Cbl1ej bbd E approach S site 160'E of 375 ceter1ire co1J.ecj bld 138.1 150.0 95 93 ' D not cxJmly CbU b1d E apro3th iteri:ir of OaLlege , 376 501S of cteriire El cai-iro real 133.2 ' 150.0' 95 rr rr* mply ' 0D11egebb.dEapp:oa&iS side, SO'S of ca'iter- 89 ' 377 lire ElcaTdmReal 135_5 150_0 95 91 Does rot curply 378 Cb11eB]d W apro3th Nside 40'W ofCL cblle? - 143.7 150.0 95 96 De rot corply 379 CbUe Bhd W apro3th N side 160'W of CL 0b1l 146.8 150.0 951 , 98 Ojqplies 380 Cb11ecj b1d W aprcth 275'W of (N).of CL cx)11E ge , 137.8 150.0 95 ' 92 Does rot curply cter Of patcti 381 aElege Bld Patch @ cutb inlet W lare Sta 60 1 141.7 150.0 95 ' 95. QiTplies Scuth e'd of ptdi 382 Ofle bl-vd patch @ a.xrb inlet W ]a . . 125.9 150.0 95 82 Wes not a]rply 383 Opllem and Patch @ curb inle1 E lane Ce'iter c E patch 134_8 150_0 95 90 I)crot _ctnply THE 'ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. tc LiJ city of cr7 . ' ' ' TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY P. Nirth'cbiity Mager ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego: IS A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego; Ca. 92138(619) 225-9641 I J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY'RESULTS - INPLACEDE.NSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 17/1-8/87 • tocATloN crr1.cd FILE No. 5295 PROJECT Cb11eR1d..PLOj±#3188 LAS. No. .087-592 DATE or REPORT 12-15-87_. CONTRACTOR TEST No . . . . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY . DENSITY _. MAX. DRY. DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE Co. REMARK S 518 Cb11e ets 75+50 16.3 14.'l- 108.8 117.0 90 93 QnpLi 519 Cb11Ba Etsx?e 70+00 12 3 '14.1 107.9 117.0 90 100 (lrrp1 520 Cbi:Ii±je Estsidc 68+05 16.6 14.1 . 101.5. 117.0 90 87. ECes rot cUTply. - 521 Cb1]epEstsxè 62+75 14_9 14_1 109_7 117_0 90 94 OXPLiffi 522 cb11ej Ests 58+00 12 3 - 14 1 9 —_103 117 0 90 89 ECes not cxnply 523 OoU8ge Estsè 56+00 14.2 14.1 103.8 117.0 90 89 Does rot crnply 524 Cblleje Estse 97+80 16.4 14.1. 98 6 117_0 90 84 Da--. not 525 CbUege Etsie 92+02 . 18.9 14.1 101.0 117.0 90 86 Dces not amply 526 OpUege Fstsi 89+50 19.5 14.1 • . 101.7. 117.0. 87_•. Does rot. coTply 527 . cb11ec Fstside 60+10 14.7 . • 14.1 107.7 .117.0 90 . 92 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING .ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. ChUem B1s..tl. Prrrie± 43188 1ri7 TEST No. ... L 0 C AT I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM Moisr. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX Day DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT . RELATIVE COMP. R EMARKS 528 b11fl Fstse 84+95 20 3 14.1 97.6 117.0 90 83 DDes rot wTply 529 ODIlege B1d Etside 78+10 19.2 14.1 96.3 117X 90 82 Dces rot Q)Tply 523A OpIlege, Etse 56f00 MJ±b1 #523 16.2 14 1 110.4 117.0 90 94 03TpLies kt.U±1 #523 Amk 522A Oaleqe Fi1±sr#522 12.0 14.1 108.9 117.0 90 93 qw Oirplies F;E=#522 520\ 0b11eg. Etsiiè 68F05 ItII±I #520 18.7 14.1 112 ..6 117.0 90 bTplles i'usi #520 329A College Ftsi 78+50 FJ±I #529 16.6 14.1 107.3 117.0 90 92 ]ipLis iu±i #529 528? oz)]-1j Etskè 85+00 ' k±ithSl #528 14.7 14.1 107.7 117.0 90 92 03TpLies MllES #528 526A bUec Itsx1e 89+00W iJ±i #526 11.6 14.1 100.7 117.0 90 92 03rb MJJb1 #526 12-8 524A OaLlecp Wests.ide 92+05 ktJ±1 #524 11.6 ..14.1 118.7 117.0 90 100 1irp1 i-.usi #524 523A b13 1tske 97+80 FE[ES #523 21.7 14.1 101.6 117.0 90 89 ) rot a)Tply 1tiJSr # 530 amege 1'taide 96+00 10.7 14.1 120.7 117 0 90 100 aTpLies 531 aplleqe 1 tsu 89+25 15.7 14.1 111.1 117.0 90 95 appLies cbUj R1' Projat #3188 Page 3 TEST I NO. . L 0 C A T I ON IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S 'MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP.. 532 ODliege B1Mi 83+75 1'tsie 11.7 14.1 '117.7 117.0 90 100 03Tp1as I V.. - .•. tc / .- V if jtyofQ1stj TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY 1) /Iøy ,. V • V St p YdzeEK '{ I'brth cbiity Brah Mmager * ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego I, A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceansid, California 92054 (619) 75770248 S S. S . DAILY RESULTS N. PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/11)187 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE No._5259 . S PROJECT_College Rlyd Jmprnyementc ,Mnfctllre median check LAB No 087-571 DATE OF REPORT _12/11/87 CONTRACTOR TEST ' IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX DRY PERCENT PERCENT NO. ..L 0. C A TI 0. N . PLACE .• MOIST. DRY DENSITY . REL.' COMP. RELATIVE: . R E M A R KS MOIST. . DENSITY . . REQUIRED COMP. Ml College Blvd median 61+50 ..-15.6 104_ S;efo:tnote on bottom M2 College blvd median 61+50 15.8 108.1 M3 College blvd median 61+50 17.4 . 105.7 M4 Cnl1egeblvd median 61+50 151 108.2 MS Cnllee hlvd median 61+50 - 17.3 •. 106.6 .. M6 College blvd median 65+50 17.4 103.8 M7 ('nilege blvd median 69+50.- 16.3 M8 College blvd median 65+50 . 16.5. . . 103.0 . S M9 . . College. blvd median 65+50. . 17.2 102.0 . . . M10 College blvd median 65+50 . 16.7 . 102.8 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY. TESTING ENGINEERS- SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES.. . . THESE RESULTS SHOULD.NOT BE. INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. 5 5 5 ('riliono Ri,d Tmnrrniomnf Mtdin Mni'cfiirp Chøck Paoe2 - TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY, PERCENT ' REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS Mil College blvd median 86+20 7.7 .10.7.0. ________ ________ ________ See footnote on bottom of page M12 College blvd median 86+20 7 0 109.6 M13 College blvd median 86+20 7 .6 106.3 ,Ml 4 College blvd median 86+20 9.2 102.8 M15 College blvd median 86+20 8.4 102.4 -M16 College-blvd median 92+00 17.6 '104.4 M17 College blvd median 92+00 17.8 103.5 M1F Cnllepe hlvd median 92+fl6 21) 4 101 7 M19 College blvd median 92+00 18.2 104.5 M20 College blvd median 92+00 .19 .5 101:7 M21 Colleg blvd median 97+00 ' 19.1 98.6 M22 College blvd median 97+00 16.3' 105.9 M23 College blvd median 97+00 16.8 105.3 M24 College blvd median 97+00 ' 16.5' M25 Co1lege blvd median 97+00 ' 17.1 104.0 NOTE: Required by contractor Median moisture check tc (ft 1) NBS/Lowry TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO - REVIEWED BY - Steven P. K&b N', North County Branch Manager Jil Testing Engineers-San Diego Jul A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St, P 0 Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225 -9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY.. TESTS 11/10/87 DATE or TEST FILE No_5259 LAB. No_ 087-562 LOCATION College Blid Carlsbad PROJECT College Blvd Improvements DATE OF REPORT 12/10/87. CONTRACTOR Tc-.-T . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY'. DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT . RELATIVE R E M A R 1 MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED - COMP. 87+00 W lane 8'W of centerline RETEST#490 490A RFTF ST 7 3 126 8 141 0 95 90 Does not comply 491 College blvd 90+00 W lane 101 E of CL 5.8 7.31 131 5 141.0 95 94 Does not comply 492 Collee blvd 93+000 lane 6'W of CL 5.8 ' 7:3 131.5 141.0 95 ' 94 Does not comoly 493 College blvd 96+00 W lane 7.1E of CL . 6.0 7..3 128.7 141.0 95 . .92 Does not cómly. 494 College blvd 98+00 W lane 11'W of CL 5 3 7 3 131 1 141 0 95 93 Does not comply 87+00 W lane 8'W of centerline RETEST #490A 4908 RETEST.#490A ' : ' 6.0 7.3. 129.7 141.0: 95 . 92 . Does not comply 90+00 W lane 15' E of centerline RETEST #491 j9j)-. RETEST #491 . ' 5.1 ' 7.3 133.5 141.0 95 . 95 Complies 93+00 W lane RETEST #492 492A RETEST #492 . 6.5 7.3 . 130.2 141.0 95 . 93 . Does' not comply 96+00'W lane RETEST #493 493A RETEST #493 ' ' ' ' 5.8 7.3 ' 129.6 141.0 ' . 95_ °. 92 . Does 'not comply 98+00 W lane RETEST #494 .494A RETEST #494 ' . . 5.4 7.3. '.131.6 '141.0' '95 94 Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF 'FACTUAL-"DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO tc REVIEWED BY 1) City'of Carlsbad 1) NBS/Lowry Steven P. Kobz North County Branch Manager 4--~ W,- - J sting Engineers-San Diego. Testing A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. -9641 3467 KUrtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225 n ____ 9O In,-1,,cfr,, Qtrgt nQir1, (Iifr,rni 09/lcd f10i 7c7J)9AP OAT( OV rc3T 10/29/87 FILE No - 087-529 5259 No DAILY RESULTS IN PLACE DENSITY TEST.S 0 987 NUCLEAR DENSITY: LOCATION Carlsbad,'CA PROJECT College Blvd. Improvements MUtI(PALPROJECTS November 19, 1987 DIVIStON DATE OF REPORT- ___________-CONTRACTOR CST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN LACE OPTIMUM MOI DRY DeNSITY. PERCENT R EL. COMP PERCENT RELATIVE R EM A R. MOIST. DENGITY Rcoumco COMP. 461 Co11ge Blvd. W. lane Stat. 85+ 11.5 7.3 139.1 140.6 95 99 Complies 20 15' E of centerline 462 College Blvd. W. lane Stat. 89+50 7..9 7.3 138.6 -140.6 95 99 Complies ' W of centerline 463 College Blvd. W. lane Stat. 93+50 8.4 7.3 139.5 140.6 95 99 Complies 8' E of centerline 464 College blvd W lane 97+00 9' E 6.3 7.3 135.8 140.6 95 97 Complies of centerline _________ College blvd. W lane 71+50 E lane 10.1 7.3 135.1 140.6 95 96 Complies 465 466 College Blvd. W. •laie 53+75 10.5 .3 .7 140.0 140.6 95 100. Complies E of centerline 467 college blvd. Stat. 57+00 13.1 7.3 129.0 140.6 95 92 Does not compl College Blvd Retest of 11467 11.6 7.3 137.0 140.6 95 97 Complies Rete of 68 Stat. 57+00 469 College Blvd. W. lane 60±00 9' - 10.0 139.5 - 140.6 95 99 Complies E of centerline I 470 College blvd. W. lane 63+00 8' 9.8 7.3 136.7 140.6 95 97 Complies W of centerline THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. - COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENT 11/1/R7 Po 9 TEST NO. - _ . IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY . DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M AR K $ 10/2 NUCLEAR DENSITY: 471 10' E of n centerlie F.S.G. College Blvd. W- lane Stat. 66+00 . 10.9. 7..3 .- 137 ..2 140.6 95 98 . Complies 472 . College Gbd W. lane Stat. 69+ 10.8 7.3 1347 140.6 95 96 Complies 50 F. S 473 College Blvd. E. lane Stat. 73+ 9.6 . 7.3 .134.2 140.6 95 95 _ Complis __ !A. 474 College blvd. E. lane Stat. 78+ 00 9.5' ' 7.3 132.2 140.6 95 . 94. ' Now Does not comply 475 College blvd. E. lane Stat. 83+ . 9;3 00- 7.3.' 134.7 140.6 ' ' 95 96. Complies 476 College blvd.. E. lane Stat. 55+00 9.5 7.3 137.5 '14.0.6 95 98 Complies 477 s College.Blvd. E. lane Stat. 59+00 9.1 7.3 137.7 140.6 95 98 Complies - - TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY . tQLC ajj7 :A)NBS/L'owry - Kirk P. Ammerman North County Branch Manager ( ii Testing Engineers—San Diego £Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. / 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 /_- 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/11-14/87 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE No. 5259 .. . . PROJECT College blvd Tmprnvmnt sphlt LAB. No. 087-573 __ . DATE OF REPORT 12/1 1/87._. CONTRACTOR . TEST NO L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS ~21 College 70+00W lane Left_turn_ lane- . 1?4 . .13p 153_0 ______. .___93 Does ~22 College_blvd RETEST #221 146.. 6 95 96 _not._tomply RETEST #221 Complies 23 College __blvd73+00 Left turn _lane_Wla e 145_g 153_0 95 96 Complies ~24 College blvd 85+00W lane Left _turn _la e. 143.8 -153.0 95 . .94 .Does not comply ~25 _. RETEST #224 . . .. . College.blvd88+00W.larie _left' _urn_la e .• . . . 145.6 153.0 95 95 .95 95 . RETEST. #224 Complies Complies 26 College blvd88+00W lane left turn la e . 1452 .153.0 r27 Coileg _blvd 70+00W__lane i5It of CL , . _. . 152.3 153.0 95 .100 Complies _. 28 College _blvd__73+00Wlane13'W__ofCL 145_7 153__0 95 96 Complies 29 College _blvd_'7600_10'W_of_CL_W_lane • .. . 137. ..__153.11 _95 • _90 Does_not comply 3O College blvd _W lane 79+00_12'W_of_CL ._14.3.0. 95 94 Does not comolv THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. • THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. rnilimno hitid Tmnrn,mnfc Acnhiit pnno 9 TEST No. LO C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 231 College blvd W lane RETEST #229 144,9_ 153,Q_ 95 95 RETEST #229 Complies 232 College blvd 14 lane RETEST #230 145.0* 153.0' 95 95 RETEST #230 Complies 233 College blvd W lane 82+00 10'W of CL 150 ,0- 153 0 ic p 95 98 Complies 234 College blvd RI ane 85+00 ia.i_ 95 100 Complies 235 College blvd 88+00 10'W of CL W lane 151 2 14R 6 - 153.0 95 99 Complies 236 College blvd 91+00 i8'W of CL W lane 95 97 Complies 237 College blvd 94+00 161 W of CL W lane 146_1 153_0 95 96 Complies 238 College blvd 97+0011 1 WofCLWlane 147.61 153_0 95 97 Complies 239 College _blvd 70+00CLW lane' 145_9 153_0 95 96 Complies 240 Coll ege blvd 70+00_101 ECLWlane. 139.8 153.0 '95 92 Does not comply 241 College blvd Wlane73+00CL - . 142_7 153_0 95 94 Does not comply 242 College blvd W lane 73+00101 ECL 140_8 153_0 95 92 Doesnotcomply 243 CollegeblvdWlane76+00CL 147_6 153_0 95 97 Complies 244 College blvd W lane 76+00CL 147_2 153_0 95 97 Complies 245 College blvd W lane 79+00 12'E CL ______ 146.8 -153.0 95 1 96 Complies Colleae Blvd Imorovements: Asohalt pn TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N - IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. . REMARKS 246 College W lane 79+00 10'E CL 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies 247 College blvd 83+00 Cl W lane 146.1 153.0 95 96 Complies 248 College blvd 83+00 101 E Cl 'W lane 146.3 153.01 95 96 Complies 249 'College-blvd 86+00 CL W lane . 146.0 153.0 95 96 Complies 250 College blvd 86+00 WE CL .W lane 141.3 153.'0 95 93 Does not comply 251 College blvd 89+00 CL .W lane 145.5 153".0 95 95 Complies 252 College blvd -89+00 91 E CL W lane . 145.3 153.0 95. .95 .Complies 253 College blvd 92+00 CL W lane 147.0 153.0 95 96 Complies 254 College blvd 92+00 10'E CL W lane 147.3 153.0 95 97 Complies 255 College blvd 95+00 -CL W 'lane'' . . 145.4 153.0 95 Complies 256 College blvd 95+00 9 1,E''CLI W lane 147.2 153.0 95 97 Complies 257 College blvd 97+00 CL W lane 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 258 College blvd 97+00 10IE Cl W lane . 146.7 153.0 95 - .96 Complies 259 73+00 '- , College blvd W lane RETEST #241 . , ' -' -145.5 153.0 - 95 95 RETEST #241W Complies 260 RETEST #242 , Colleoe blvd W lane 73+00 ______ 145.2 153.0 95 . 95 RETEST. #242 ' Complies Colleci Blvd Tmnrnvmnts Acnhlt P;;no d TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN - PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY - DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. CdMP.. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K $ 261 College blvd E lane 71+50 15'W of CL 145.3 153.0 95 - 95 Complies 262 College blvd E lane 73+00 101 W of CL 145.7 153.0 95 96 Complies 263 College blvd E lane 76+00 81 W of CL 145.9 153.0 95 96 Complies 264 College blvd E lane 79+00 7'W of CL 145.8 153.0 95 96 Complies 265 College blvd 12'W CL 82+00 E lane - - 146.7 153.0 - 95 96 Complies 266 College blvd 10'W CL 84+00 E lane 145.9 153.0 95 96 Complies 267 RETEST #250 College blvd 86+00 WE CL W lane 145.2 153.0 95 95 RETEST #250 Complies 11-14 - - - 268 Colleg blvd E lane 69+00 12'E of CL 145.0 153.0 95' 95 Complies 269 College blvd E lane 72+00 11-'E of CL 149.5 - 153.0 95 98 Complies 270 College blvd E 1ane75+00 10IE of CL 147.7- 153.0 95 97 Complies 271 College blvd E lane 78+00 WE of CL 146.4 153.0 95 96 Complies 272 College blvd E lane 81+00 91 E of CL 145.0 —153.0 95 95 Complies 273 College blvd E lane 84+00 WE of CL - 145.0 153.0 - 95 t * 95's Complies 274 - College blvd 87+00 E lane 121 E of Cl ______ 138.8 153.0 95 1 91. Does riot comply Ciionc Ri,d Tmnrnwomont4z AcnhAlf TEST No. : - L 0- C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM Moisr. IN PLACE IDRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. - R E M A R K S - 275 College blvd 90+00 E lane 101 E of Cl 140.6 153.0 95 92 Doe snot comply 276 College blvd 93+00 E lane 11'E of CL 141.7 153.0 95 93 Does not comply 277 College blvd 95+00 E lane 12'E of Cl . 147.3 153.0 95 97 Complies 278 College blvd 98+00 E lane 10tE of CL .145.5 153.0 95 95 . Complies 276A RETEST #276 College blvd 93+00 E lane 11'E CL 145.9 153.0 - • 95 96 Complies 275A RETEST #275 College blvd 90+00 E lane .10'E of CL . 148.5 153.0 9 95 97 Complies 274A. RETEST #274. College blvd Elane 87+00 12 1 E of Cl 145.3 153.0 95 95 Complies 279 College blvd 69+30 E lane CL 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies 280 College blvd 72+00 Cl E lane • 141.9 153.0 95 93 Does not comply 281 College blvd 75+00 E lane CL 145 1 153 0 95 95 Complies 282 College blvd 78+00CL E lane 145.8- 153.0 .95 96 - Comlies 283 College blvd 82+00 E lane.CL . - . 145.6 153.0 - 95 95 Complies 284- College blvd 83+50 E lane CL - -149.2 153.0 . 95 98 Complies 285 College Blvd 87+00 CL E lane . . -.145.1 153.0 . . 95 95 Complies 286 lCollege blvd 12'W of CL 87+00 E lane ______ - 145.0 153.0 95 95 . - Complies - Cn11tn RT,r1 Trnnrn;mpnf, Inh.1t Pan P f TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 287 College Blvd 90+00 CL E lane 146.7 153.0 95 96 Complies 288 College blvd 90+0010'W of CL 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 289 College blvd 93+00 E lane CL 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 290 College. blvd 93+00 E lane 10'W of CL 146.8 153.0 95 96.2 Complies 291 College blvd .96+00 E lane CL 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies 292 College blvd 96+00 E lane 12'W of CL 145.3 153.0 95 95 Complies 293 College 98+00 E lane CL 145.6 153.0 95 95 Complies 294 College 98+00 E lane 12'W of CL 146.8 153.0 95 96 Complies 295. College 98+00 Left tirn lane E lane 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies 280A RETEST #280 College blvd 72+00 Elane , 145.6 153.0 95 95 RETEST #280 Complies 296 College blvd 57+00W lane 143.0 149.0 95 98 Complies 297 College 54+25 W lane CL 134.8 153.0 95 88 Does not comply 298 College blvd 60+00 W lane 10'E CL 133.5 149.0 95 93 Does not comply 299 College blvd 63+00 W lane 10'E CL 139.3 149.0 95 93 Does not comply 300 College blvd 66+00 W lane 10'E of Cl ______ 141.5 149.0 95 95 Complies ('nllann' I,1..,4 Tn,nant,nmnn+r lrnInl+ TEST • No. - L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST: IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMA RKS 301 College 68+50 W' lane 12'E of CL 139.2 149.0 95 93 Does not comply 302 College boyd 68+50 E lane left turn la e 136.3 149.0 95 -- 91 Does not comply 303 College 68+50-E lane CL 134 5 149 0 95 90 Does not comply 304 College boyd 68+50 WE of CL 134.7- 149.0 95 89 Does not comply 305 College blvd 53+00 WE of CL W lane 146.2 149.0 95 96 Complies 297A RETEST #297 . . College b1vd54+25 W lane CL - 142.0 149.0 - 95 93 RETEST #297 Does not comply 306 College blvd 574O 9'W of CL E lane 140.1 149 0 95 94 Does not comply 307 College blvd 60+00 8'W of CL E lane 141 1 149.0 95 95 Complies 308 College blvd 63+00 81 W of CL E lane 137.4 149/0 95 92 Does not comply 309 College blvd 66+00 left furn lane E la e 141.3 149.0 - 95 95 Complies 310 College blvd 68+70 left turn lane E 1 aiie 137.6 149.0 95 -92 Complies 311 College blvd 68+70 E lane 12'W of CL 142 2 149.0 95 95 Complies 12 College blvd +7fl F lane Cl . _________ 1401 149.0 95 94 Doc not comply 301A RETEST #301 College b1vd68+50 W lane left turn lane 142.3 149.0 95 95 Complies 313 -- College blvd 70+00 E lane 10'W of CL ______ 147.5 149.0 95 99 Complies ,_.___. n, ... I n,...,.i. - TEST No. - - . L 0 C A T I 0 N - IN PLACE MOIST.- OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY . DENSITY .. MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE. COMP. I J R E M A R K S 314 College blvd 72+00 E lane 8'W of CL 143.5 149.0 95 96 Complies 315 College blvd 75+00 E lane 8'W of CL 143 4 149.0 95 96 Complies 316 College blvd 78+00 lOW of CL E lane 143.8., .149.0 95 96 Complies 317 College blvd 81+00 12'W Cl E lane 142 ..8 149.0 95 96 Complies 318 College blvd 84+)) 10'W CL E lane 143A '149.0 95 96 Complies 319 College blvd 87+00 121 W CL E lane 141.-9 '149.0 95 95 Complies 320 .College blvd 90+00 10'W CL [lane ., 142.4 .149.0 95 . 95 Complies 321 College blvd 93+00 9'W CL E lane 142.0 149.0 95 95 Complies 322 College blvd.95+00 E lane -; 142.1 149.0 95 95 Complies 323 V College Blvd 97+50 CL E lane . . 141.0 149.0 95 94 Does not comply 306A College b1vd57+00 9'W of CL E lane RETEST #306 140.1 149.0 95 94 Does not comply 324. College blvd 70+00 Elane 10' E CL . . 142.3 149.0 95 95 . Complies 325 College blvd 73+00 E lane WE CL 143.2 1490 95 96 Complies 326 College blvd 75+00 E lane 10'E CL . . 143.0 149.0 95 .96 . Complies 327 College blvd 78+00 E lane WE CL ______ 143.4 149.0 95 96 Complies / J Testing Engineers—San Diego I ' A Division of United States Testing Company Inc 3467 Kurtz St., 'P. 0 Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138(619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS-IN' PLACE DENSI.1Y:TESTS DATE or TEST 1i/1R/F7 A/C NUCLEAR DENSITIES LOCATION ___05r_______________________________________________ FILE No 5295 PROJECT_Ch11c'cj R11, -jct #3188, J0h1tie C1ricrrti LAB No_fl7-Qfl DATE OF REPORT_12-15-87 CONTRACTOR TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE 01ST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE H DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP'. REMARKS 334 Cbliaq2 c 9ffrflrh 7Cfl' ç -f 03aterjIme <jj .1420 ...510 - 95 93 - iL i 31j 1fl'S rif nmter1ir Ch11 V 150.3 :153.0 95 V 98 V OJTp1i V335 336 (1Jj Cb11ePiro3thIDODUeca-iterl'ire V V 140.5 153.0 95 92 r not crp1y 334A S açproth 250'S of CL College V FE= #334 V 145 0 153.0 95 95 _____ CbTplies jjj #334 33EA 0bUtj3 approach to college cEnterLre ni #336 145_1 153_0 95 95 cbrp]ies fflb1_#336 337 0b1] 240'N of citer1ar CollegeN aprcdi 145.4 153 ..0 95 95 0jip1 338 Cb11f3jNapra:xth120'N of ciiterLreCb11ej 149.7 .153.0 95 98 Cbp1i es 339 cJj11e prcth cbi1eg ceitrLne 145_2 153 0 95 95 cbip1a THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM V V TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR 'SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. V V THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL V TESTING ENGINEERS.- SAN DIEGO tc V V V V REVIEWED BY 1)City of C~rJ.sta V V V V V• V V rth Oty Brth Jj/ Testing Engineers —San Diego I,! A Division of United States Testing Company Inc o LILi ° 3467 KurtzSt., P.O. Box 80985,. Sari Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILYRESULTS -IN PLAC.E DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/19-25/87 A/C Nuclear Densities LOCATION r1.chd FILE No. 5295 PROJECT ODLIege LAB. No. M7-591 DATE OF REPORT_...J,2.,.j.5+87 CONTRACTOR TEST No -- L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 340 9+50 W lane 10'W of centerline . 144.4 150.0 95 97 (bTpLi 341 /2+00 W 1ae 12'W of canterline . 145.4 150.0 95 . 97 CipU es 342 75+00 W lare 8'W of aentErline . 148.6 150.0 95 98 Cbip1ies 343 8+00 W ae 8' W of centerline 148.6. 150.0 95 100 Oi,p1ies 344 1+() W 1,-r 91W CTF rrtr1ir _146 ._1500 95 ._95 as 345 34+00W lane 8'W-of omterhm 147_3 150_0 95 99 (pli ccnplaes 346 59+90_5'E_of_cterLr 147_5 150_0 95 99 _______________________ 347 9+5015'E C1ter1fr . 1478.0 .150.0 95 . 99 Oip1i 348 1 69+50 Left turn lane .. . 146.2 '150.0 95 98 apu es 349 /2+00 12'E cmterifre 141.8 150.0. . 95 . 95 Oar p1ies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM' STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED, PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE 'INTERPRETED ,S ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TEST L 0 A TI 0 N IN, PLE OMOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dny DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M AR K S MOIST DENSITY REQUIRED COMP 350 72+00 left turn lane 145.4' 150.0 95 97 Ctnplies 351 75+00 10'E caterLr 142.7 150.0 95 96 Cbrp]i es 352 78+-00 10'E c81terLre 146.0 150.0 95 98 Cb1p1] es 353 81+00 12'E centerline 143.7 150.0 95 96 OiTlies 354 84+00 10'E oenterline 147.4 150.0 95 99 anplies 355 87+00 11'E centerLine 143.3 150.0 95 96 anplies 356 87+00 10'W cEnterllre 143 5 150 0 95 96 Cbrplaes 357 87+00 left turn lane 150.0 95 97 Omphes 358 90+W90~ 11'W centerline 141 9 150 0 95 95 CoTpLies 359 90+00 121E centerline 135.5 150.0 95 91 D rot anply 359A 90+W12'E ceiterLr R=#359 142.0 150.0 95 95 03Tp1i rs' #359 360 93+00 10'W oEntErlirib 146.0 150 0 95 98 Cb1p13es 361 93+00 9'E mterLre 144.8 150 *0 95 97 QJTplles TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN, PLACE 01ST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Driv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 362 95+00 10'E cEnterline 146.5 150.0 95 98 CmIalies 363 95+00 8'W clterL]ne 143.9 150.0 95 96 OxpLies 364 97+50 9'E aenterline 142.4 150.0 95 95 03i1i 365 97+50 10'W cmterJJre . 143.2 150.0 95 96 CaTiplies 11-25 366 El crtiro re].. MIN of aollege bhd (Ji.st et of turrunq js]ai) 142.8 150.0 95 96 Cbiplaes 367 0 EL aiTdm Feal 50 IN Of GD11ege Bhd 142.4 150.0 95 95 Omlalies 368 E1niro F1 110'N of Cbllerp 131.6 150.0 95 "88 Does not amply 369 ODUEge El curo real at the 3ntertatn of the S lane 138.4 150.0- 95 93 Dan rot apply 370 El C1Bro I1 30'S of OD11ege 134.5 150.0 95 90 Doess rot amply 371 El Cniiro I1 100'S of Cb11j D5.9 150.0 95 91 Does rot amply 372 th1 of OaUege 30'W of El Cmro I1 133.8 150.0 95 90 [ rot anp1y 373 INacdame of Cb11eg 50'W of El Cmro Ra1 138.2 19n.0 95 93 Does not cxrp1y tc 1) City of cristai 0 . .. . TESTING. ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY 0 SbavEn P.K±rzef\ Mirth ctu-±y B r — ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. LL to 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 ____ 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILYRESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 17-1-87 A/C Njo.1r Daisities LOCATION Cr1ch1 FILE No. 5295 PROJECT 0b11ejBud.,Prcde±_#3188,_A.ti1tir_(1-rrrpt-p LAB. No._087-591 DATE OF REPORT_17-15-87 CONTRACTOR TEST No. . . LOCATION IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. ODIlege V 374 CbUig blid E aprcth S side 275'E of CL . 142.7 . 1ftfl Cb]Jeg bhd E approach side 160'E of V (bip1i 375 centerline cnl:I13ft hIMI 138.1 150.0 95 93 Does rot. cxrrply 02]Bge bbd E aprcth cEnterlim of Cbllej . 376 50 IS of genterline El idro real 1337 150..O 95 fl- . Cb11e bl'c,d E açprcath S side 50'S of cmter- 89 ml- mTply 377 Lrie El crum Peal .135.5 L50.0 95 91 DDes not amply 378 CbUø BiMi W aproth N se 40'W of CL CbUe - 143.7 15.0 .0 95 96 D rot curply 379 CbUe B1dW açprcath N site 160'W of CL CaLIEW 146.8 150.0 95 98 CbTp]ith V V 380. ODU blid W approach 275'W of (N) of CL coTh V V 137.8 . 150.0 95 92 not crrrply cuiter ot Pat= 381 Cb11e Bld Patch @ a.xrb inlet W la-re 5th 60 . 141.7 150.0 95 95 0ip1ies Sarth ed of patch 382 Cbl1egi b1'd patch @ o.irb inlet W 1we V . 125.9 150.0 .95 V 82 D rot coiply 383 CbUe Bivi Patch @airb inlet E lane Omter C ~ patch 134.8 150.0 95 90 . .. Does not amply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES.. V THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINIONOR JOB CONTROL. V to 1)city of cr:ai V TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO V REVIEWED BY V ftirth clinty iiar / Testing Engineers—San Diego .oto,4& 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. t7all iJ 2956.1ndustry Street, Oceanside; California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY'RESULTS -IN PLACEDENSITY TESTS: DATE OF TEST 11/18/87 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE NO. 5259 PROJECT CollegeBlvd.,Improvements LAB. No. 088-120 DATE OF REPORT 1/20/88 CONTRACTOR TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S f ASPHALT-.J' . 384 . S approach 250'S of centerline College 142.0 153.0 9.5 93 Doesnotcomply 385 S approach . 150'S.of centerline Colle e 150.3 153.0 95 99 Complies 386 S approach to College centerline 140.5 153.0 95 92 Does not comply 384A RETEST #384 Sapproach.250'S 'of centerline _Colleg 145.0 153.0 95 95 Complies Retest #384. 386A RETEST #386 s approach to _Collegecenterline 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies' Retest #386 387 240'N of centerline College N approac 145.4 153.0 95 95 Complies 388 Napproach120'Nof _centerlineColleg S 149.7 153.0 95 98 Complies 389 CollegeapproachCollege _centerline 145.2 153.0 95 95 Complies J T THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUtE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERSSAN DIEGO tc S REVIEWED BY 1.)- City of Carlsbad )NLowry Steven P. Kbze , North County branch Manager C68-015-019 II ~-AGG~RE~~~TN~67~ COIEGEBOULEVARD-'-IMPROVEMENT S DATE SAMPLE TAKEN . , . DESCRIPTION'. COST" ".. .. . ' " •0, , '06-15-87 . " Durability - Coarse. . $90.00 Durability -,Fine - . '65.00 . . . 07-08-87 .. . Durability T. Coarse '.. 90.09 . .. . . Durability - Fine 65 00 07-20-87 Durability - Coarse 90.00' Durability. - Fine , . " 65.00 : 07-28-87 ' . Durability' -. Coarse . '.' . P90.00 . . . . . 'Durability. - Fine , " 65'. 00 Sand Equivalent 60 00 • .. • 08-17-87' . ' Sieve Analysis . '. 35.00 Durability -. Coarse' ' 90.00. . • • . . Durability - Fine • . • • 65.00 . I • Sand Equivalent . ', '.60.00' . • . . • 08-28-87 • " •. Durability- Coarse'' ,. 0.00' Durability' - Fine :, ' 65.00 ' R-Valve . . • ' 130.00- Sieve Analysis 35.00..: 10-15-87 . Durability Coarse' ' .90.00 • . •. • • • ' Durability ,-Fine, . •, '. '65.00 R-Valve '. . .' '' 130.00 • • . 'Sand,Equivalent ••.. , ' 60.00 . . 10-16-87 . . • ..' Sieve' Analysis , . The City will pay. . , • ' ': .... Sand Equivalent ' for one cornlete • ' R-Valve • . • set 'of aggregate •Durability - 'Coarse base tests. All. . . • . . • ',, . Durability - Fine others are to be • • •. . • paid by contractor.,, TOTAL $1,490 00 FORM 7 JP _ . . Testing Engineers—San Diego Li 3467 Kurtz St., P.O.Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 A-Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. -. - 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054(619) 757-0248: LABORATORY NUMBER - : - DATE 087-373 July 31, 1987 Job No 5259 RECEIVED . - . [\1JG 41987 CITY OF CARLSBAD - 2075 Las Palmas Dr. NS/LOWRY . Carlsbad CA .920094859 -. - . - : - •• Project: College Blvd. Improvements.- Carlsbad, CA Project #3188 Subject: MaterIal sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel and submitted to the laboratory on July 28,..1987, identified as: .. Class II -Aggregate Base, Sample 0, secured from jobsite - various, areas. Procedure:' Durability Index tested in accordance with Cal Trans Method #229 both . Coarse and Fine. Results: . - COARSE - FINE - - SPECIFIED LIMITS . . CF 51 ' DF33 Clay = 10...8 35 Mm . ..• .- . - -•• Sand 35 . - SAND EQUIVALENT a part of Durabilit Index: Results: - . 31 . . 28 Min. TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Albert F.. deBerardinis . - ';•._ . S ••• North County Branch Manager . •- . . . . . . - . . . . - is . • . . . • . . - - S.. - 1) City of Carlsbad - - •, •: . : . .. .•. -. .,. L)J'J.BS/Iy' - . . -. ., .' ': • : . • 1) South Coast Asphalt P Testing Engineers —San Diego l A Division of United States'Testing Company, Inc.0 3467 Kurtz St., P.O.ox 80985, San-Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 j 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, -California 92054 (6 19) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER . : DATE - 087372 -. : July 29-,' 1987 Job NO. 5259 . . .•• - . . CITY OF CARLSBAD . . . . 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad' CA 9200.4859 -. - Project: CollegeBlvd. Improvements . . Carlsbad, .CA Project #3188 Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel 'and submitted to the laboratory on July 8,. 1987, identified as: . •- Class II Aggregate Base, -Sample #2, secured from jobsite - various areas. Procedure: Durability Index tested i.n accordance with Cal Trans Method #229 both' coarse and fine. Results: . . . . . . . . ... COARSE - - - .. FINE ' S SPECIFIED LIMITS CF .54 DF=38 - Clay 10.7 35 Mm. ; - - - - • Sand = 3.0 - - • TESTING-ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO;. • .S- - -' . - . • • Reviewed by: • • - . -.. - S -- - • v - S Albert F. deBerardinis - • • - S - - - - . - - - - North County Branch Manager - • . •• - - S - ls •, - .S- - - -- , - - • - - 1) City of Carlsbad - - S. • - - .5, - S .- - -. - - - Cl). - NBS/Lowr - -- . ' - ' S • S • • - -.: -•-: -. ' 1) South Coast Asphalt - • , 5 5 • S - - - '• Testing: Engineers—San Diego . . .A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St.,P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca.92138 (619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 PifYSICAL PROPERTIES. OF SOILS & AGGREGATES LABORATORY REPORT . Client CITY OFCARLSBAD .- ...-- ... JobNo. 525-9 2075 Las Palmas Dr.— . Lab: No. . Carlsbad CA 920094859 Date of Report 9-4-87 Attn: Pat Entezari . . -. .. . . . . ?:3ject College Blvd. Improvements Project-3188 . .... .. . . Lc:a:ion Carlsbad, CA . . Sampled by TESD Date 8/28/87 :ye of Xaterial Class II Base Submitted by-. TESD . Date 8/28/87 Erce of Material- On site Location Sap10 Station 50+55 W/B lane (S/B lane) ------------ 2nd Lift Sieve Analysis, ASTh C136- Test Standards are ASTM unless otherwise noted Sieve Se Passing Accuu)at1ve 'Specification C - s. 100 -_100 98 - - 90-100 85 72 46 35-55. 37 - 17 10-30 13 Ic: 10 ______ 77 2-9 E;ecjfjcatjc Data/Co_-ens Test - : Res ult Speci rice tion TEST 570 Durability -Index Course ti 35 Mm. C2- Durability - Index Fine 31 35 Min. c'- Resistance Vear. rev. . C131 Grading .Vear. 500rev. . Abrasion rev.,C!3!- Gradi ng S year. 1000 rev. . . Fractured Feces by vticnt Llçuid Limit/Plasticity Incas /' . / D424- Cleanness Value . . . . .. . Calif 227- Sand Equivalent Value 22 Min Calif 217 Resistance •R" Value . 78 Mm_ taut 3oi- Moisture. Density.. Peatjont Per Dry Dcrtsty7 '1. 0 oce- 0 017- . 0 t.LSHTO T9c- 0 SHTO TIED Optimum. Mcis)4c. . v.etr,cc • /. . Sr.eciIic rvity : Ltrt/n. - 0 Cl??- 0 C?5- Eu1, /Dry 1 . E>% 1550). . Iarcot Refers to applicable requie ntsas listed inthe Standard - Specifications for Public W ks (Green Book) 1) City of Carlsbad 1) NBS/Lowry /flL€t 4. 1) South Coast Asphalt Reviewed Diego cLLP Kirk Ammerman North County Branch Manager C, PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS & AGGREGATES LABORATORY REPORT Client CITY OF CARLSBAD 0 Job No. 5259 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Lab No. Carlsbad CA 920094859 Date of Report 102887 Project Improvements to College Blvd. Project #3188 - Location Carlsbad, CA Sampled by TESD Date 10/16/87 Type of Material Class II Aggregate Base - Submitted by TESD Date 10/19/87 ''...Source of Material South Coast Asohait .. Location Sampled Stockpile on site Sieve Analysis. ASTH C136- Test Standards are ASTM unless otherwise noted Sieve Passing Accumulative SpecificationSire 3. 2. 100 - 100 94 90-100 .5 31e - 57 so so .:. q it 15 10-30 100 1.2 2-9 Specification Data/Comments Test Result.'Spec if1cat1on TEST 510 Fineness Modulus C125- Org anic Impurities C'40- esistance To Abrasion rev. C1.31 Grad i ng C3-. Grading Veer. 'O0 rev. - Vear. - rev.: Wear. 1000 rev. .. Fractured Faces by ulicnt Liquid Limit/Plasticity index / /' O424 Cleanness Value - Calif 227- Sand Equivalent, Value 58 Calif 217 - Resistance R Value 80 calir 301 - Durability - Coarse/Fine 74/32 Moisture Density qelations Max Dry Dens ity.pct. - 0 otct- 0 Di,- 0 t.LSHTO Tgc- '0 £..SHTD 11E0 Optimum Moisture. Method . . specific. Gravity.. £-bsorpt ion. 0 0 C1??— 0C12E sulk (Dryl . bulk ISSDI • Lpparrnt L : 0• 0 . 0 •• . H •• 0 0 is 1) City. of Carlsbad 1) NBS/Lowry Testing Engineers--San Diego Reviewed by: - Kirk P. Ammerman, C.E. Nsrth (ni,ntv Rrinch Manaar, Teat Rezult 'Specitication TEST STD Dürability-IndexCoar 74 e mini -Ca1227 burability-Index-Fin . 32 35 min .. Ca.1-227- Resistance To Abrasion Wear. rev. . . C131- Grading wear. 500 rev. . . Vesr. rev; . •- .- C535- Gradi ng Veer. 1000 rev. . Fractured F.ce by vt/cnt Liquid Limit/Pisaticity Index // / • DM24- Cleanness Value • • • Ca lif 227- Sand Equivalent Value • • . . • Calif 717 ResnccR Value • 80 80 mm. Calif 301- Moisture Density Peiatcn, Max Dry Dcnsty.per. . 0 06St 0 01557 0t.sHTo T99- Q LSHTO TIED-- Optimum mois ture. . pctroc Seciric Gravity bzcrpt ion. . * 0C17 0 CITE Apparent Bulk (Dryl Bulk 15W) Sieve Size It Passing Accumulative 'Specification 3/e c. - It 30 lot I L C D2ta/Cor.ents . - 'p rM J4 Testing Engineers—San Diego J% A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.OBox 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(61.9)225-9641 r J. 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 PEYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS & AGGREGATES . . . . . LABORATORY REPORT Client City of Carlsbad Job No 5259 2075 Las Palmas Drive Lab No 87-1262 Carlsbad, CA 9200974859 Date of Report 11-6-87 Project College Blvd.; * Improvements Project 113188 Location Carlsbad, CA . Sampled by TESD Date I fl-1S7 Type of Material Class II Agg. Base Submitted by TESD Date Source of Material So. Coast Asphalt . Location Sampled .Stockpile on Site Ac.TM C1- Tpct Standards are ASTM unlss otherwise noted Per Standard Specifications fo r Public works construction S ection 200-2.2.3 . . .. . Testing Engineers- -San Diego Reviewed by: - Kirk P. Ammerman 'Torth County Branch Manager .4 . J/ Testing Engineers—San Diego . I%, A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. I 1 _____ • 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 r J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS & AGGREGATES LABORATORY REPORT Client CITY OF CARLSBAD - Job No 5259 2075 Las Palmas Dr. . . Lab No. SD87-996 Carlsbad CA 920094859 Date of Report 12/7/87 Project College Blvd. Improvements Project No. 3188 Location Carlsbad, Ca. Sampled by. T[SD Date 8/17/87 Type of Material Class II Base . Submitted by TESD Date 8/17/87 Source of Material On site Materials Location Sampled various locations / Sieve Analysis. ASTM C136- Test Standards are ASTM unless otherwise noted Sieve Size % Passing. Accumulative *specification II.. 3" 1½" 100 100: 3'4" •• 95 : 90-100 76 3/8". -. 66 Na. q . . . 45 3555 8 69 48 30. 36 * 10-30 so 28 100 19 200 11.8* 2- Specification Data/Comments Test . Result Ispecificaticiri TEST STO Durability Index-Coarse 66 35 Nun.. Durability -Index-Fine 33 35'Min. ResIstance To. . Abrasion Sand 3.7 . . C131- Grading Clay - . . 11.2 . % Veer. rev. . C535- Grading year. 1000 rev. . Fractured Faces S by wt/cnt Liquid Limit/Plasticity-Index . ,/• . . / Cleanness Value . . . calif 227 Sand Equivalent Value 31 22 Mm. Calif 217- Resistance "R" Value Calif 301- Moisture Density Relations Max Dry Density.pcf. 0 0696 0 01557- 0 AASHTO T99- 0 ALSHTOT180- Optimum Moisture. . Method . S - Specific Gravity Absorption. It 0 C127 0c128-- • Bulk (Dry) . Bulk LSSOI . Apparent - Refers to applicable requirements as listed in the Standard Specifications forPublic Works (Green Book). ., • . . . . . *— Falls outside of specified limits. • ls 1)_CLtyof Carlsbad Testing Engineers--San DieR EC El VE...D l Lj$ijry Reviewed by: DEC 161 1987 iEE _S/LoWRy tS.D. • . • Steven P. Kobzeff • . • . . . North County Branch Manager • ( Jill Testing Engineers—San Diego A,Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 KurtzSL, P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 1 2956 Industry Street. Oceanside. California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/10/87 FILE NO. 5259 LA B. No._087-571 LOCATION. _Carlsbad PROJECT _College Blvcl TmprovPmentc Moigtijre median rher.k DATE OF REPORT _12/11/87 CONTRACTOR 1/OCl/ ' TEST No. L 0 CAT I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY - PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R EM A R K S Ml College Blvd median 61+50 15 6 104_5_ * 12" depth M2 College blvd median 61+50 15.8 108.1 * 8" depth M3 College blvd median 61±50 - 17.4 105.7 *6" depth M4 College blvd median 61+50 15,.7 108.2 . * 4" depth MS Cnllege hlvd median 61+50 17.3 : i.......*106.6 * 2" depth M6 College blvd median 65+50 17.14 103.8 * 12" depth M7 Cnllege hlvd median 65+50 ..16.3. 103 0 * 8" depth M8 College blvd median 65+50 16.5 103.0 * 6" depth M9 College blvd median 65+50 17 2 102.0 4" depth M10 1,College blvd median 65+50 16.7 102.8 0 • . * 2" depth THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. Cr11ri Ri;d Tmnrnvomnnf-c McrIin MrIi.CfI,r Chrk PMIP 2. TEST - No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE. MOIST OPTIMUM MOIST. 1. PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT. REL. Co.ip. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP - R E M A R K S tvlll College blvd median 86+20 .7 .7 107 0 _______- _________ _________ * 17" dept-h N112 College blvd median 86+20 7.0 109.6 * 8" depth M13 College blvd median 86+20 . . 7.6 106.3 . - _______ * 6" depth M14 College blvd median 86+20 9.2 1.02.8 . . * 4" depth M15 College blvd median 86+20 84 102.4 . _. 2" depth M16 College blvd median 92+00 17.6 4 -104 * 12" depth - M17 College blvd median 92+00 17.8 103 5 * 8" depth M1F Cnllege blvd median 92+flfl 20 A _________ 101 7 * 6" depth M19 College blvd median 92+00 18.2 104.5 * 4" depth - M20 College blvd median 92+00 . . 19.5 . 101.7 . * 2" depth M21 College blvd median 97+00 19.1 98.6 * 12"idepth - M22 College blvd median 97+00 16.3 105 9 * 8" depth M23 College blvd median 97+00 16 8 105.3 * 6" depth M24 College blvd median 97+00 16.5 1 _________ 105.5 1 * 4" depth M25 College blvd median 97+00 -- 17.1 104.0 2" depth NOTE: Required by contractor Median moisture .check TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO tc REVIEWED BY 1) City of. Carlsbad 1) NBS/Lowry Steven P. Ko&.,North County Branch Manager Jt 'Testing Engineers-San Diego V I'D A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc.. . V . Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, SanD/ego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 3467 V V V V - 2956 Industry 'Street, Oceanside, California 9205.4 (619) 757-0248 V DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TES T S DATE OF TEST 1/21/88 FILE No 5259 LOCATION ('.r1 bd PROJECT _College Blvd, Improvements:. LA 8. No. 088-129 . ' ' DATE OF REPORT-] CONTRACTOR TEST NO. ' V V , ' ' L 0 CATIO N . . '- IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS V ,VV MOIST DENSITY .V REQUIRED' Coup. . Centerline of narrow portion. 555 4Median501 NofSend•Depth12"('' 20.6 140 896 117 0_ 77 . * Centerline of narrow portion 556 V 50'Nof,S end Median 'Depth6" __ V 19.1 14.0 96.3, 117.0 '* . 83' * Median 50'1N of S end Depth 2" 557 centerline of narrow portion__'• _' 18.8 V 14.0 _. 99•3 ___V 117. 0 * V 85 Median 350'N of S end 2'E v_558, of Vcen.terline _-Depth _'12" _____." __ V, 19.5 14.0 . 98.5 117.0 V'* ' V 85 * V V Median "350'N of S end V2IE 559 of_centerline_Dèth_6"_'_. 20.0 J14.0__' 29.3 117.0 85 V Median 350'N of. S end 2'E V ' V , 560 of,_centerline _Depth 2" _''. _. V • 20.3 14 .0 .87.3 .117.0 '* . 84 *. Median 500'S of N end , centerline 561 -median between _planting _areas'Deph'i2 ''23.9 15.0 95.7 , 113.0 * , , ' 85 ' * Median 500'S of N end centerline 5,6 2' median-between planting _area _:dept1i_6" :30.0 15.0 V 90.7' 113.0 Mçdian 500'S. of N' end centerline 563 median 'between _planting_ará_depth2" 28.9 - 15.0 90.6 ' '113.0 ,. - ' * ' 80 V - ' Median - 350'S of N end CL of 564 median depth 12" 16.9 15.0 1 101.3 117.0 * _' 86 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTIV 'E•. THE REPORTING OF FACTU A L D A T A D E R I V E D F R O M TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED P R O C E D U R E S . THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR .100 CONTROL. .9 .. College Blvd, Improvements'. •. S Page 2 TEST No. - L 0 CAT I 0 N - - IN PLACE. MOIST, OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX DnY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COUP. R E M A R K S 565 Median 350'S of N end CL of median depth 6" 16 1 15 0 104 5 117 0 * 89 * 566 Median 350'S of N end CL of median depth 2" 17 9 15.0 93 6 . 95 117 0 * 80 * 567 Median 50'S of.'. . N end depth 12" 21.8 . 15.0 113.0 * 84 * 568 Median 50'S of N end depth 6" 21.1 15.0 95.5 113.0 * 84 * 569 -Median 50'S ofN end depth 2" 20.7 15.0 96.6 - 113.0 * 85 * * For Information Only Note:. All Tests Done' Per Contractors Request -, t,c . . I).---City of Carlsbad . S . - . TESTING ENGINEERS .SAN DIEGO S / LowrjJ REVIEWED BY S Steven P. Kobe'f North County Branch Manager ., ~ . ., ". ; . , - '. - , 4. , , , '- I CflT.T.F.(F RT.\Jfl TMWRC\IFMF.NT TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST, IN PLACE DRY MAX. DaY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M .A R K. S MOIST: DENSITY REQUIRED COMP.- 9-18 N1]EART NW'S IYA1LT7 19 So.-Face'curb ' . . 140.3' .152.0 95 , 92 Does not comply 20 . 2' No. Face curb So./Face curb , 137.4 152.0 95 9.0 Does not comply 21 4 1/2' No. Face curb ' ' ' 149.1 ' 152.0 95 98 , omplies 22 STa. 35+50 6'/2' 'So. Face 'curb . 151.4' 152.0. 95 100 , Comp lies 23 Sta. 30+55 7' So Face curb 150 4 152.0 95 99 omplies 24 Sta. 30+50 ' ' '' ' ' 153.3 152.0 95 100+ Complies 25 On Palomar'. Air Port Rd W/Bnd side ' _____ S1- 7+lfl 7 F Center line 143.7 152.0 95 95 Complies Palomar Airport Rd. Sta-. 7+25 28' E Center line • • ' ' ' ' ' 26 Palomar Airport Rd 1.44..2 152 0 95 95 Complies 27 Sta 75+65 221/2' E Center line 147 2 152.0 95 97 Complies Palomar Airport Rd.' , ' ' ' ' ' 28 21"E Center line Palomar Airpor 143 5 152.0 95 95 Complies 29 St a 76+85 261/2' E Center line 143.1 152.6 95 94Does not comply _____ Palomar Airport Rd. ' 30 Sta. 77+00 22' E Centerline' ' 143.4 152.0 . 95 . 94' Does not comply' Palomar Airport Rd. lane 3' E' Face curb ' 31 I N/Bnd 0+38. ' 151.5 152.0". 95 100 Complies 11 COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PAGE H in-7Q-A 7 TEST No. LO CAT 10 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY :DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 9-18 U C LER'DER SI TYoWKWKt? 32 0+15 15' •E Face curb 144.7 152.0 95 95 Complies 33 0+15 5' W Center line Isand. . 1.42.8 152.0 95 9.4 Does not comply 34 ______ 2+30 So./Bnd lane , . 3 W Center line Island . . . 144.1 .152.0 . 95 95 Complies 35 So./Bnd Sta. 4+40 5 W Face cur 146.7 152.0 95 97 Complies 36 Sta. 4+50 15''E Face curb . . 147.4 152.0. 95 97 Complies 37 Sta. 4+50 So./Bnd lane .7 . . 3. E Face curb . . . . . . 144.1 . 152.0 . 95 .93 Does not comply 38 So./Bnd Sta. 7+00 9' E face curb 150.9 . 152.0 95 99 . Complies 39 Sta. 7+10 6' E . . 145.6 152.0 .95 96 Complies .0 Sta 7+30 6' W Face curb . . . .143.6 . 152.0 .95 95 Complies 41 Sta. 19+00 3' EFace curb . 145.2 152.0 95 = 97 Complies 42 Sa. 19+05, 5' E Face curb, . 147.8 152.0 . '95 ' 99 Complies 43 Sta. 19+20 ' . . , . 146.0 1520 95 96, Complies 44 Sta. 24+50 5 1/2" E face curb 150.5 152.0 95 99 Complies 45 Sta 24+49 17' E Face curb . .. 146.1 152.0 95 96 Complies . . TEST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. N PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv " DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E Ni A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. )-18 tNUCLEARDENSITY 67AiALT11 r446, STa 24+45 6' W face curb 150.4' 1.52 .0 95 99 Complies Sta. 28+45 4' W face curb 1.47..2 152 0 95 97 Complies 28+30 Center line lane So Rnrl 144 4 '152.0 95 96 Complies Sa. '37+50 So./Bnd lane 147.7' 152.0 95 97 Complies 2 1 E face curb ' L5O STa. 37+55 12" E Face curb s , . ' 146.6 15.0 95 97 'Complies )-18 NUCLEAR D NSITY 347 N/Bnd lane Sta. 52 50 5.4 ' 6' W Face CSrb 8.0 131.3 ' 138.0 95 ' 95 Complies 348 N/Bnd lane t /+ . 7 0 4 7 8 0 131 0 138.0 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane S ., 44+15 ' 349 '2.' E Center ne ' 5.1 8.0 137.1 138.0, '95 ' '99' Complies 350 N/Bnd lane Sta 40+70 5.3 8,0 Center 1 e ______________ 137 6 138 0 95 100 Complies - 351 ' e St 5+50 , N/BndAace 5.8 ' ' .0 128.8 ' 138.0 95 93 , Does not comply 2' E cub N/Bnd lane Sta 35+50 5 0 8.0. 134.0 138 0 95 97 Complies 352 11' , Face Curb 353 Sta 31+70 N/Bnd lane 6.4 8.0 134.0* 138.0 95 97 Complies 4''W Face curb 354 ' Sta. 27+60 8" E Center line 5.0 8.0 ' 136.7 138.0 95 99 Complies lane TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N . IN PLACE - OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S Moisr. DENSITY - REQUIRED COMP. 9-18 NUCLEAR DENSITY.: '. S Sta. 27+80 -15'- W Center line . ;. 355 lane A.8 8.0 128 3 138.0 95 93 Does not comply 356 S t a 28+65 nter li ly,lane 5A, 8.0 135.17. 138.0 95 98 Complies 357 S t a 22+50 2' W Fa e curb 4.5 8 0 131 A 138.0 95 96 Complies 358 STa. 18+30, 31/'/E Face curb 4.9 8.0 18.0 138.0 95 100 Complies / l.P\rjj\ 359 .N/Bnd lane 14+00 A urb 7 1 8.0 131 3 138.0 95 95 Complies 360 N/Bnd 1a)7"Sta \+20 center line 6 4 8.0 13'2.7 138 0 95 96 Complies 361 N/B lane Sta. +70 1 E face 6 7 8 0 130.4 138 0 95 95 Complies 362 Run B/s 3' E of 1' E Face curb 5.4 8.0 137 3 138 0 95 100 Complies For back-up info. - - . 9-19 n5i N/Bnd lane 3' E face curb 53+00 152 8Sta, 144 8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane 2' W face curb STa. 52+50 150 4 152 8 95 98 Complies 53 N/Bnd lane Sta 50+70 A F. farp 'nrh 146.5' 152 .8 , S 95 96 Complies ~5-j N/Bnd lane Sta.'50+45 4 .W face curb - -. S - 148 4 - 152 8 S 95 97 Complies S LI TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DY PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 C A T I 0 V PLACE MOIST.--- MOIST. DRY DENSITY DENSITY REL. COMP. REQUIRED RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R 9-19 tE N/Bnd lane 50+50 Center line 55 lane .144.6 152.8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 50+47 56 W face curb , V 145 1 152.8 95 95 Complies N/Bnd St 47+45 57 f 'lane ace, curb 147 3 152.8 95 96 Complies 58 N/Bnd lane Sta 47+30 2' W center line lane V 145 4 1528 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 47+50 4' E V 59 Face curb V 145.0 1528 V 95 95 Complies 60 N/Bnd lane Sta 45+00 146.3. 152.8 95 96 Complies 3 1/2" E Face curb N/Bnd lane Sta. 44+95 12 1/2' 61 E Face curb 150.0 V 152.8 95' 98 Complies N/Bnd lane STa 44+90 4 1/2' 62 W face curb 147 5 152 8 V 95 97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 40+70 63 W fa,ce curb 148 7 1.52 .8 95 97 Complies 64 N/Bnd lane St 40+70 f ace curb 143.8 152 8 95 94 Does not comply N/Bnd lane Sta. 37+40 65 5' E face curb 146. 152.8 95 ' V 96 Complies 66 N/Bnd lane S ta. '..37+45 Center line V ' 150.0 152.8 95 ' 98 Complies lane 5' No. Man Hale 67 N/Bnd lane 37+40 V 9' W fice r 11 r 148.5 - 152 8 95 97 Complies 68 N/Bnd lane STa 31+75 V 1449 152.8 V 95 95 V Complies 2 1/2 ' W face 'curb - - V /'(\TTt'r'E' DT1T T.,cDDrnT V IA L'M'PC TEST ' 0 C AT 1 0 N' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX.'. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9- 19, /Bnd,,lane St. 31+70 69 enter Iine lane S 148.1 152.8 95 97 . Complies N/Bnd lane Sta., 2+00 , .70 3'-W face of curb S 146.5 152.8 95 9.6 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 26+05 71 6' W face of curb S S S 157.9, 152.8 95 99 Complies 72 N/Bnd lane Sta. 26+00' S 14' E face curb , ' 148.1 152.8 95 ' 97 N/Bnd lane Sta.' 18+30 5 Complies 73 S 5 -1/2' W face curb S 146.6 152.8 95 96 .. Complies 74 N/Bnd lane Sta 18+38 14 1/2' W face curb •. 148.3 152 8 95 97 Complies 75. N/Bnd lane Sta 14+00 11' W face of curb 149 6 152 0 95 98 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 14+11 76 2 1/2' W face of curb 145.4 .152.0 95 95 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 8+60 77 3' W face of curb 148.3. . 152.0' 95 97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 8+55 . 78 53 E face of curb', . - 143.7 152.0 95. 94 Does not comply 79 N/Bnd lane Sta. 4+25 5 3' W face of curb 5 151.0 152.0 95 99 Complies S N/Bnd lane St. OO '8 0 2 1/2 ' E face of curb S , S 144.3 152 0 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane STa 3+50 81 1/2' E face of curb 152.0 152A 95 100 Complies 82 S/Bnd lane Sta. 3+50 147.9 152.8 95 97 Complies 'E 13' face of curb . ' ('(\T T.tt't' DT IT T 14 DDtTV1(VMDC TEST No. ,. t .' . LO ' IN PLACE OPTIMUM Molsr. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP.. 9-19 83 S/Bnd lane Sta. 7+00 143 9 152 8 95 94 Does not comply 11' E face of curb 84 S/Bndane Sta. 7+05' 0 6 1/2'.E face of curb . 146.7 0 152.8 95 . 96 Càmplies 85 S/Bnd lane TaO+25 f ace of curb 148.9 152.8 95 98 Complies 86 S/Bnd lane Sta.. 37+00. 9' E face of curb 146. 152.8 Complies 95 96 87 S/Bnd lane Sta. 30+59 3 1/2 ' E face of curb 145.7 152.8 95 95, Complies 88 S/Bnd lane sta 24+55 1477 1528 95 97 Complies 3 1/2 ' E face of c urb 89 S/Bnd lane STa. 24+50 13' E face of curb 145.7- 152.8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd. lane Sta. 19+10'146.9 90 2' Eface_ofcurb 152.8 95 96 Complies 91 S/Bnd lane Sta.,18+50 9 1/2'E face . 145.9 152 8 95 96 Complies 92 curb. •. S/Bnd lane Sta 14+55 . . 0 13 1/2 Ffp' nf curb 145.5 1.52 .8 95 95 Complies 93 S/Bnd lane Sta 15+00 147 6 152 8 95 97 Complies 9 1/2E_ face _of_ curb. 94. S/Bnd lane Sta.- 15+50 144 6 152.8 95 95 Complies 2' E fac e of curb 95 S/Bnd lane Sta. 14+00 9? F._Fa'eofrtirh 145.8 152.8 . 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane STa.. 10+48 96 2' E Face of curb 146.4 152.8 95 96 Complies ('I'r TVC't' DTTTT\ TEST No. L 0 C A T I ON IN . PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Day DENSITY raun PERCENT REL. COMP. 1! PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 N U AR NJTY OF ASP H ALJ S/Bnd lane Sta. 10+00 97 S , . 12 1/2 E face of curb . . .147.O 152.8 . 95 96 Complies 98 S/Bnd lane Sta. 10+25 . . . . 8 1/2 E face of curb . 147.9 152.8 95 . .97 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta 15+00 5' E face of curb . 148.0 152.8 95 97 Complies S N/Bn lane STa. 15+10 100 . 'Center . 1.5 152.0 152..8 100 Compl.ies S/Bnd lane.S.ta. 51+85 . 101 4' E.face of curb. . . 143.7 152.8 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane 51+80 102 9 1/2 E face of curb . . . S 146 3 152 8 95 96 Complies S/Bnd lane 51+90 103 5 1/2' W face of curb 145 5 152 8 95 96 Complies 104 S/Bnd lane Sta. 51+80 144 7 152'.8 95 95 Complies 2 W face of curb N/Bnd lane STa 51+00 105 136 5 150.0 95 90 Does not comply 106 STa 50 '50 5' W face of curb 137.0 150.0 95 91 Does not comply 107 Sta 50+'50 .1V W face of curb .139.7 150.0 95 93 Does not comply 108 At SDG&E sign H.P. gas line 1/2 W face of curb 144 8 150.0 95 97 Complies 109 At SDEG sign H.P. gas line . S 142.2 150 O 95 . 95 Complies 9 1/7 W Fr r,F curb . 110 Sta. 44+75 71 /2' W face of curb 143.4. .150.0 95 95 Complies COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 18' 10-29-87 TEST No. - L 0 C A T I 0 N' ______________________________________________ IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT .REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 UCL-EAbENSLTY0N, ASPHJJT N/Bnd E sect of cap approximately 146 0 152 0 95 96 Complies Sta. 53+00 6 W Face of curb' ' , . 112 N/Bnd Sta 39+00 13 W face curb 143 9 152.0 95 95 Complies 113 N/Bnd Sta. 32+0,0 12' W face curb ' 142.5 150.0 95 ' 95 ' Complies' ' 114 N/BNd Sta. 29+45 5 1 /2' .W'face curb ' 143.0' 150.0, 95 - 95 Complies 115 N/Bnd Sta. 25+50 5' W fac,e 'curb . 145.7 152.0 '95 96 Complies 116 N/Bnd Sta 20+50 4' W face curb 148'.3 152.0 95 98 Complies 117 S /Bnd- lane Sta 47+60 152'.0 5 E face of curb 145.3 95 96 Complies 118 S/Bnd lane STa 41+15- Center line lane 148 2 1527 0, 95 98 Complies 119 S/Bnd, lane STa. 47+65 , 5 W face of curb - , 145.2 152.0 95 96 Complies 120 S/Bnd lane Sta 42+53 2 1 /2' E face of curb 144.7 152.0 95 95 Complies S/Bnd lane Sta 42+50 121 13 E face-- of curb .- - - . -_. 150 1 152 0 95 . 99 . . . Complies 122 S/Bnd la-ne 5taf42+2 144 2 152 0 95 95 Complies 123 S/Bnd lane Sta. 39+00 7' 'W face of curb 143.4 152.0 95 - 94 ' Doesnot comply 124 _____ S/Bnd lane Sta .' . 11 1/2 W face of curb 149.5 - 152.0 95 98 Complies ST -- L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOI ST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dny DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 125 S/Bnd lane Sta.. 37+30 : 3'.W face of curb 0 147.3 152.0_. 95 97 Complies 126 S/Bnd lane Sta. 37+5 0 14.4 152.0 95 96 Complies 127 S/Bnd lane Sta., 28+00 0 155.0 152.0 95 100+ Complies 18 S/Bnd lane Sta. 28+09 15" Face of curb _______ 15.2 152.0 95 100 Complies 129 S/Bnd lane Sta. 28+20 1' W Face of curb Island (CNRB) . 144.2 152.0 95 95 Complies 130 S/Bnd lane S ta. 28+83 0 1'W 'f 0 3 ace of cut b 147.3 152.0 95 97 Complies 131 Sta 22+80 7 W face of curb 148.7 152.0 95 ' 98 Complies 132 Sta.,19+05 10' W face of curb i47.0 152.0 95 97 Complies 133 Sta 18+90 3' W face of curb '144.5 - 1.52 .0 95 95 Complies 134 Sta 18+50 7' W face of curb 147.2 152.0 95 97 Complies 135 S'/Bnd lane St. 1.4+50 . 0 ' 4' W face of curb 0 146. 152.0 95 97 Complies 136 S/Bnd lane Sta. '7+00 tj f.qrp nfriirh 0 , 146.2' 152.b 95 96 , Complies S/end lane Sta. 6+80 O 137 12' W face of curb ' 0 0 147.0 152.0 95 97 Complies 138 S/Bnd lane Sta. 32+50 3' Wface of, curb . 144.7 152.0 95 95 Complies _COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PA(1 fl TEST No L 0 CA TI ON IN PLACE, Moisy. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dny DENSITY Pcncc,-r REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S 9-19 - INU1RENSITYPFASPHALT irn / DENSITY REQUIRED Coup. S/Bnd lane Sta. 3+00 ' Complies 14' W fae of curb S 149.6 152.0. 95 98 140 Check out left turnpocke w/Kirt C. area not compactedrangd ,' 13.9 152.0 95 , 90 Does not comply I t from 85-93 141 Sta. 33+00 4 W face of curb'. 140.7' 152.0 95 '92 Doe not comply 14.2 Sta 30+45 8' W left turripocket 136.9 152 0 S 95 90 Does not comply 114 31 Sta 30+45 8' W left turn pocket - 136.-4 152 0 95 90 Does not comply Sta. 30+50 2' W face- o curb . ' J..e.ft turn 'Docket ' '1293 152.0 ' 9 85 Does not comply 1 45 Sta. 30+50 7' W. face of curb ', left turnpocket ' ' ' ' . ' - ' .135.9 152.0' 95' ' ' 89 Does' not comply Ta. 2+50 6' W face of curb ' 139.5' 1 f- t'iirnporker ' ' 152.0 95 ' 92 , Does not comply STa. 33±94 '5' W face, of cnrb ' left turnpocket ' ' . ' - 141.0 152.0 95 ' 93 - Does 'not comply 9-24 NUCLEAR DENSITY Sidewalk W side Center line' 363 '41+75 5 11.9 ' 14.0 ' ' ' 111.0 ' ' 116.5 - - 90 ' 95 Complies ' 364 - Sidewalk W side Center lin •, Sta. 45+50 - , ' ' ' 11.7 ' 14.0 110.4 - 116.5 '90 ' , 95 " Complies - 365 Sidewalk W side Center line ' ' STa. 49+00 ' ' , 12.6 14.0 108.0 ' '116.5 90 - 93' ' Complies C0T.T.1a1 RT.VT1 TMPP1VF.MFNTS PA('1? 11 1fl....10_7 ST No. L 0 C A T I ON' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-24 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . 366 idea1k W side Center line 9.5 .14.0 112.0 116.5 .'90 96 Complies Sta. 51+75 . 1r'-NVQ-U-L EA R. All tes t s are-retests of te :taken 9-21-87 Re-A College Blvd. left turn 146.3 152..5 95 96 Complies RETEST A lane CL of Lane 230'N of CL . Re-B College Blvd. Left turn CL . . 46.8 152.5 95 . 96 Complies RETEST B Palomar airport rd. left Re-C lane 100'W o.f CL 1375 Does not comply 152.5 95 90 retest C Palomar airport rd: left Re-D turn loot W of CL college b vd. 144.3 . 152.5 Complies 95 . 95 RETEST D Palomar airport rd. tight Re-E turn lane 230' E of CL 143 1 . 152 5 95 94 Does. not comply 0 . . rètst E Palomar airport rd. rt. lan Re-F 148.4. 152.5 95 97 Complies RETEST F 120' E of CL college blvd. . l40.6 38' S of CL Palomar airport Re-C 152.5 95 92 Does not comply Rd. CL of college blvd. . . * . RETEST C - 9/25 NUCULEAR DENSITIES-FINISH SUB GRADE 367 Sidewalk E side College Blvd. . Centerline Sta. 42+00 .9.3 14.0 100.1 1165 90 86 ' Does not comply Sidewalk E side College Blvd.. 36 8 Centerline 39+50 . 10 1 14.0 100.1 116.5 90 86 Does not comply 369 Sidewalk E. side College Blvd. 9.2 14.0 100.1 116.5 90 . 86 Does not comply ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego p A Divisioh of United States Testing Company, Inc. . , 3467 Kurtz St., P.O.Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 I J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 10/30/87 LOCATION Carlsbad, CA FILE No. . . PROJECT_ College Blvd. Improvements - LAB. No._5259 DATE OF REPORT_November 18, 1987 CONTRACTOR . . TEST NO. f A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX: DRY DENSITY PERCENT. REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/3(). NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: College Blvd.-Stat. 3+O0 148 W center 146.4 .152.6 , 95 . ' 96 Complies 149 ' College Blvd. Stat...55+00 . . / . '146.7. ' 152.6 95.' . 96 - Complies 14' W center line W lane 150 College Blvd 57+00 16' W center / 145.2 152 6 95 95 Complies line W lane 151 College blvd. 60+00 151 W center . 143.4 152.6 . .95 94 'Does not comply line W lane . 152 College blvd. 62+00 14' W. center . 142.8 152.6 95 94. Does not comply line West Lane . . . 153 Retes'tl51:-'60+00 15' W centerline . . . , 144.8 152.6 '95 95 ' Complies Retest #151 'W lane' . . . 154' College blvd. 60+00. centerline . 152.6 95 147.7 . 97 Complies' W lane 155 College blvd 53+00 Centerline 140.5 152 6 95 92 .W Jane - Does not comply 156 College blvd Retest#1 146.7 1.5.2.6 95 96 Complies Retest# 155 Stat. 53+00 centerline Wiané ' . . THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL - DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM' STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS' ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL.' COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS : 11/18/87 Pagp 2 TEST No. L 0 C A IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. - - 10/'3L NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: 157 College blvd. Stat. 55+00- center 148.7 : 152.6 95 97 Complies line W.. lane,. .., '• 158 College blvd Stat 57+00 Center 146 0 152 6 95 96 Complies line W lane 159, Retest #15'3 Stat 60+00 15 W :. centerline W. lane 7 .152.6 95 96 Retest 53149 • Complies 160 College blvd. 62+00 14' W center ' . 146.5 152.6 95 96 Complies line _W.lane 161 College blvd. Stat. 62+00 center 146.2 ' 152.6 95 96 ' Complies line W. lane 162 College blvd. Stat. 64+00 15' 146.0 152.6 95 96 Complies W centerline W. lane . 163 'College blvd. Stat. '64+00 center • 145.8 152.6 95 96 Complies line' W. lane ' • 164 College blvd. 66+00 9' W center . ' ' 146.1 152.6 95' • 96 Complies line W lane ' ' ' • 165 College blvd. 66+00 Centerline • 151.7 152.6 95 99 Complies ' W lane 166 College blvd. Stat. 68+60 10' ' 150.6 152.6 95 99 Complies 'W w of centerline lane 167 College Blvd. 68+00 centerline S 146.1 152.6 95 ' 96 ' Complies Wlane S • S S 168 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 1O'E • centerline.W lane S 5 141.4' 152:6. • 95 S 93 • Do not comply 169 College blvd S t a t 53+00 10' E centerline_W_lane 145.7 1.521.6, 95 96 Complies College blvd. 55+00 left turn 5 170 . S • • • lane W lane S • 147.3 152 ' .6 95 '97 ' Complies COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 3 TEST No. L 0 C A T I ON - - IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT - RELATIVE -- - - - R- E M _A 'R KS MOIST. DENSITY - REQUIRED COMP. 10/30 NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT College blvd Stat 55+00 6 E ol 171 centerline W. lane - - - -- 144 9 - - - 152 6 -- 95 95 Complies - College blvd 6' E of centerline 172 57+00 w lane 149.7,-- 1.52 .6 95 98 Complies College blvd. Stat. 57±00 left 173 turn lane W. lane - - - - - 144.9 - 152.6 95 9-5 - Complies 174 College blvd. Stat.- 59+00. 12' E - 152.5 - 152.6 95 - 100 Complies of centerline W. lane -- - - College blvd.-Stat. 62+00 12'E - 175 cii centerline -W. Lane - - 151.9 152.6 95 100 Complies 176 college blvd. Stat. 64+00 14' E - - of centerline W. lane 148.5 - 152.6 - 95 97 Complies 177 College blvd. Stat. 66+00 12' E - 147.8 152.6 95 - - 97 Complies - of centerline W. lane - - - 178 College blvd Stat 68+60 10' E 147 4 152 6 95 97 Complies Of centerline W. lane - - - - - ç;ollee blvd. Stat. 8±69 15' E - 179 àf centerline E-. lane - - - - - - -1 . 47.3- 152.6 -95 - 97 - Complies College blvd. Stat.-68+60 , - 180 7' E of centerline E. lane - -1462 1 52 6 - 95 -96 Complies College blvd. Stat. 66+00 15' 181 of centerline E. lane 149.0 - 152,.6 ' - 95 - 98 Complies - 182 College blvd. Stat. 66±00 center - line E. lane - - 145 - .7 1526 95- 96 Complies - College blvd. Stat. 64±00 12 1 -E - 1-47 .2 152.6 95 - - 96 C - omplies - of center me t lane - 184 College blvd.- Stat. 64+00 center - line E. lane . - - : 145.0 -152. 6 - - 95 95 - - Complies COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 4 TEST . - - IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 C A PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E A MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. IO/3C NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT College blvd Stat 62+00 0 185 E of centerline. E. lane - 150.8- 152.6. 95 99 Complies 186 College blvd. Stat. 62+00 center . 145.8 152.6 95 96 Complies line E. lane . . . . 187 College blvd, Stat, 60+00 15' E 150.8 152.6 95 99 'Complies of center line E. lane 188 College blvd, 60+00 centerline 145.8 152.6* 95 96 Complies E_lane 189 College blvd Stat 57+00 12' 150.8 ..152.6. 95 99 Complies E of centerline E. lane 190 College blvd. Stat. 57+00 center 151.7 152.6 95 99 Complies line E lane 191 'College -blvd, 55+00,13''E - 146.0 152.6 95 96 Complies centerline E. lane 192 College blvd. Stat 55+00 center line E. lane 147.2 152.6 - -95 97 Complies 193 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 13' E of centerline E. lane 146.2 152.6 95 - 96 Complies 194 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 center - 149..6 152.6 95 . 98 Complies line. E. lane .195 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 left . 149.5 152.6 95 98 Complies turn lane E lane 196 College blvd. Stat. 55+00 15' W - 145.6 152.6 95 95 Complies of centerline E lane 197 College blvd. Stat. 57+00 14' 147.8 152.6 95 ' - 96 Complies- ____ W of centerline E lane COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS L 0 C A T IN OPTIMUM Dny DENSITY R J p. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/3( NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: - - 198 College Blvd Stat 60+00 14' W of centerline E. lane. ,, 150 7 152 6 95 99 Complies 199 College blvd Stat 62+00 12' W 147 8 of center E lane 152.'6 95 96 Complies 200 College blvd 64+00 13' W of 147.2 152 6 95 97 Complies centerline E lane 201 College blvd Stat 66+00 left 148 7 152 6 95 97 Complies turn lane E. lane . . . 202 College blvd. 68+70 left turn, , ' 148.4 152.6 95 9,7. , Complies lane E. lane . 203 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 15.' W of centerline W lane 145.6 149.3 95 - . 98 Complies 204 'College.bivd. Stat. 55+00 12' ' 142.5 149.3 95 95 Complies W'_ofcenterline W. --lane . 205 College blvd Stat 57+00 14' W 148.'8 m pliesane 149.3. 95 99 Co of center. line W' l . College blvd Stat 60+00 12' W 206 of centerline W lane . . .14.4.4 149 3 . 95 . - 97 Complies 207 College blvd. Stat. 62+00 14' . , 144.8 149.3 95 97 Complies W of' centerline W lane 208 College blvd. Stat'. 64+00 14' W , 146.6 149.3 ' 95 '98 ' Complies of centerline W lane 209 College blvd. Stat. 66+00 12' W ' . of, centerline W lane 142.6 149.3 ' 95 96 , Complies 210 College blvd Stat 68+60 14' W of Centerline W lane ' 1 42 9 149 3 95 95 Complies . . 0 211 College . blvd . Stat. 68+60 4' 0 141.9 . 149.3' 95 95 Complies E of :centerline E lane -'- COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS. S .1 1/18/87 Page 6 IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Dv PERCENT PERCENT T No. LOCATION PLACE MOIST. DE DRY NSITY ii DENSITY REL.COMP. RELATIVE REMARKS S MOIST,REQUIRED COMP. LO/30. NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT - 212 College blvd Stat 66+00 18 E .of -centerline E'lane 142.0 149 3 95 95 Complies College blvd Stat 64+00 16' E 213 of centerline E lane . . . . 142 3 . 149 3 . 95 99 Complies 214 College blvd. Stat.. 62+00 15' E 143.6 149.3 95 96 . Complies. of centerline E lane 215 College blvd. Stat. 60+00 14' E . 145.5 149.3 95 .98 Complies of centerline E lane 216 College blvd Stat 57+00 10' E S . of centerline E. lane . 143 5 149.3 95 96 Complies College blvd. Stat. 55+00 12' E 2 1 7 of.centerline E land . 144.b S 149.3 95 5 . 97 Complies 218 College.blvd. Stat. 55+00 left 143.4 . 149.3 95 96 Complies left turn lane E lane . . College blvd. Stat. 53+00 8' E 219 of centerline E lane . 147.0 149.3 95 99 Complies 220 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 left 145.1 149.3 95 98 Complies turn .laneE lane TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN .DIEGO . . REVIEWED BY Kirk -P. Ammerman North County Branch Manager ,4ç9/Ii T P"Cc/77 ::c f.rrT 'E' TTTTr r.xDoyL'qD'Mme DAry 0 1 'O 0i TEST No. L 0 C A TI 0 N• IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIsT. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY , DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . . REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 NUCLEAR DENSITY:. 7 5' E of E lane 30' S of Center 338 6.3 , 8.0 .1 26.3 . 137.0 95 92. Does not( comply .me of Palomar Lyirport Rd. 339 "'RETEST OF #42 / 8 2 8.0 131 1 137 0 95 RETEST OF TEST //42 Complies 340 " ETES OF //4 7 8 8.0 130 3 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //t C.rmp1is 341 ETES OF 44 . . 7.5 8.0 131.0 . 137.0 95 , ' 96 ' RETEST OF TEST 1/44 Compl. 342 V1ETEST 1/45 7.8 8.0 . 130.5 137.0 9.5 .95 . RETEST OF TEST 1145 Complies 343 0 #41 7 2 8 0 130 6 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //41 Complies 344 VETESj RETE ST OF TEST //39 . . OF' 39 ' . 7.5 8.o 130.2 137.0 95 ' . 95 Complies 345 ' E/ST OF //37 7 2 8.O 132.0 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //37 Complies 346 W RETEST OF #36 . .. 8.1 .8.0 132.1 137 ..0 . 95 95 RETEST PF TEST 1/3 6 ______ _________ _________ _________ • ' Complies )_18J(ucLE&D ENS kTy:oNAspHAL.T? '• . , . . .. . '. _______________ ta 53+00 9' S F C S/Bound lane 146 2 152.0. 95 96 Compli1es 2 J ta 52+30 8 S F C 147.-6 152-.0 95 97 Complies ta. 51+80 3' 'So. FC. ' , . . 147;8 152.0 . 95 . 97 Complies 14J 5 ta. 48+70 6' So.' F.C. .. , 149.6 152.0 95 98 ' Complies CflT.T.F.(1 RT.\Jfl TMP1flV1?.M1NTS DAI't' fl 1 'O fl7 TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 9-18 TTY Sta 47-80 5' So F C 148 7 152 0 95 98 Complies 6. 310.0 uped to 325.0 - 45+50 . 5' So. F.C. 0646-146 94.2.. . . S 146.7. 152.0. . 95 9.7 Complies 7 Sta 46+85 5' So F C 144 2 152.0 95 95 Complies 8 Sta 46+80 5' So F C 143-5 152.0 95 95 Complies 9 Sta46+50 4' S9. F. C. S 145.1 152.0 95 96 Complies S 10 Sta. 44+25 2 1/2' So. F..C., 147.9 152.0 95 .97 Complies 11 Sta. 44+20 9.1/2' So. F.C. S 149.4 152.0 95 98 : Complies 12 STa 40+37 2 1/2' So F C 147 3 152 0 95 97 Complies 13 Sta 39+82 1' N Center Island :. :. . et Isi at future Palomar 131.8. 152.0 95 88 Does not comply 14 Sta 39+90 +7 142 .2, 1.52 .0 95 94 Does not comply 15 + 25' 2' N Center line Island 148 4 152.0 95 98 Complies 16 Sta. 40+60/2 1/2 N Center line S slaad, . 147.4 152S .0 95 _________ 97 S Complies 17 Sta4,40+85 Center line Island S 137 8 152 0 95 91 Does not comply 18 STa. 40+85 5' N of So, face curb 140.6 152.0 95 93 Does-not comply ,s7z'26 77Jf fliJi Testing Engineers—San Diego - A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. , 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225 -9641 - I J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 - .. TEST No. - L 0 C A TI 0 N - IN - PLACE MOIST. - OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT . RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 1 College Blvd median 61+50 ..15..6 10_ See footnote on bottoi of page .2'. 2 College blvd median 61+50 15.8 108.1 3 College blvd median 61+50 17.4 105.7 4 College blvcl:median 61+50 ' 15,1.. 108.2 s-c- %-.- 74 ('n. 11 PqP hlvrl median 61+50 17.3 - _106.6 ~46 College blvd median 65+50 . 17.4 103.8 7 1 Fiqp hlvd' median' 65+50 '16.3 103.0 . . . . . 8 . College blvd median 65+50 . . 16.5 .103.0 9 ' college blvd median 6550 ', •. 1'72.. ' .102.0 10 College blvd median 65+50 . , .' 16.7 . '102.8 - THE,ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM 'STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES.' THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. . I_J Testing Engineers—San Diego ID A Division of United States Testing Company Inc 1EiVEI 3467 Kurtz St,PO Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 1iJ 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 JAN 2 5 1988 DAILY RESULTS IN PLACE DENSITY. TESTS . MUNICIPALPQOJECTS DIVISI DATE OE.TEST 11/17-18/87 . . LOCATION Carlshrn-i FILE No.5259 . PROJECT College Blvd., Improvements LAB. NO. 088-1120 . DATE OF REPORT 1/.20/88. . CONTRACTOR . . . TEST No . . . . . . . . L 0 C A TI 0 N .'. IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE. DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE . . R M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 11/17 College Blvd South approach 58'W of. . . 544 . centerline El Camino Real 240'S of CL 4.6 177 A. 141 p' 95 91 . 'Does not comply S. approach. 50'W of centerline El 545 Camino Real 120'S of centerline Coile e 5.7 7.3 ' 133.1 141.0 . 95 95 Complies S. approach 20'S of centerline Colieg 546 ' . 48'W of centerline El Camino Real. . 5.2 , , 7.3. ' .128.3 ' 141.0 '95 . 91 ' Does not comply 547 College median St// 59+50 centerline 22 7 14.'.0 '95.5'' 117 0 90 82 Does not comply 548 College median St/I 66+50 centerline 15 6 - 14.0 100.3 117 *.0 90 86 Does not comply 549 College median St/I 88+00 centerline 16 .*8 ..12.1 105.2 121.0 90 87 Does not comply - 550 College median St// 93+00 164 12.1. 105.2 121.0 90 87 Does not comply 551 College median St//'81+75 . . 173 12.1 102.1 121.0 90 84 Does not comply .552 ' College Median . St// 75+75. ' ' ' 13.0 1 14.0 1 104.7 117.0 90 ' . 90 ' Complies .11/18 Retest //544 S approach 240'S of , 544A. centerline College . . . ' 6.2 7.3 . 131.3 .,141.0 95 , 93 Does not comply Retest544 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING. ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. -.- College Blvd, Improvements Page 2 - TEST lu OPTIMUM . IN PLACE MAX. Da PERCENT PcncEur L 0 C A I I 0 N PLACE MOIST. Day DENSITY REL. Coup. RELATIVE R M A R K $ - MOIST. * DENSITY REQUInCO Coup. 240'S of centerline College .• . . . . -- 544B Retest ,#544A -..S approach 5.6 7.3 135.9 141.0_ 95 97 Complies . Retest //544A Retest /1545 . . . *. . . 545A South approach 6.9 7.3 - - .135.'2 141.0 •- .95 - 96 - Complies Retest /1545 N approach 275'N of . . .- 553 centerline College -5.2 7.3 133.6 141.0 95 95 Complies . 4 N- approach 125'N -554 at centerline College -, . -- - -- 6.3 7.3 135.0 -141.0. 95 . 96 Complies - * Retest #546 Approach centerline 546A of Colle'e * . - 6.5 -. '7.3- 135.2 141.0 - 95 - 96 ComDlies Ps-t- /1cLA r _J Testing Engineers—San Diego . Jf A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St;, P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 1 L) 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/18/87 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE No. 5259 . PROJECT CollegeBlvd.,Improvements LA e. No. 088-120 DATE OF REPORT 1/20/88 CONTRACTOR_ TEST No. L 0 CA T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K $ ASPHALT 384 S _approach250'SofcenterlineColle e' ' _"142.0 '.153.0 95 93 Doesnotcomply 385 S_ approach 150'S _ofcenterlineColle e . .150.3 153.0 95 99 'Complies 386 S approach to College centerline 140.5 153.0 95 92 Does not comply 384A S_approach250'Sof centerline _College RETEST /1384 . . 145.0 153.0 95 . 95 Complies Retest /1384. 386A S.approachto College centerline RETEST /1386' 145.1 153.0 95 95 Complies' Retest //386 387 . 240'N of centerline College Napproaci . ', 145.4 153.0 95 . 95 ' Complies 388 Napproach _120.'N.of'centerline College '. . . .149.7 153.0 95 98 Complies 389 CollegeapproachCollegecenterline . '145.2 153.0 95 95 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY ' (i 1) NBS71-o—wry Steven P. 1(obze , North County Branch Manager RECEIVED (J Testing Engineers—San Diego . " 198B JAAF ADivision of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St.,P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 iPA PROJECTS DMSt0M DAILY RESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/10/87 LOCATION Carlsbad FILE No. 5259 . . . .. . .. PROJECT _College Blvd Tmprovmnt ,Mictiire median rherk LAB. No. 087-571 DATE OF REPORT .12/11/87 S CONTRACTOR TEST No. L 0 C A T 1'0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. . IN PLACE , DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE - . R E MA R KS MOIST. . . DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. S Ml College Blvd median 61+50 15.6 1045_ * 12" depth - M2 College blvd median 61+50 - 15.8 108 1 * 8" depth M3 College blvd median 61+50 17.4 105.7 * 6" depth M4 College blvd median 61+50 157 108 2 * 4" depth M 5 College blvd median 61+50 17.3 106.6 . .. * 2" de ph M6 College blvd median 65+50 1714 103.8. * 12" depth M7 College hl yd median 65+50 16.3 103.0 8" depth M8 College blvd median 65+50 16 .*5 L 103.0 . 102.0 * 6" depth M9 College blvd median .65+50 17.2 . . . . . 4 depth M10 College blvd median 65+50 16.7 102 .,8 * 2" depth THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS, CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR. JOB CONTROL. 4 fllu,1 Tm ,mrfc MrHr, mni ef,iro ChcrL' EST o. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY )ENSITY - MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP -R E M A R K S I_. College blvd median 86+20 7.7 107.0 _________ * 12" depth 2 College blvd median 86+20 7 0 109.6 * 8" depth L_ College blvd median 86+20 7 6 _______ 106.3 _______ * 6" depth 4 College blvd median 86+20 9.2 102.8 * 4" depth 5 College blvd median 86+20 8.4 102 4 * 2" depth 6 College blvd median 92+00 17.6 104.4-+ * 12" depth 7 College blvd median 92+00 17.8 103 5 * 8" depth L8. College blvd mrhn 97+00 2n -4 101-7 _________ * 6" depth 9 College blvd median 92+00 .18 .2 104.5 * 4" depth 0 College blvd median 92+00 19 5 101.7 1 * 2" depth - '1 College blvd median 97+00 19.1 98.6 127depth 12 College blvd median 97+00 16.3 105.9 * 8" depth 13 College blvd median 97+00 16.'8 105.3 1 * 6" depth _. 4._ rnllpqp blvd median 97+00 16 5 ________ 105 5 ________ _______ ________ * 4" depth 25 C011ege blvd median 97+00 - 17.1 104.0 . * 2" depth STE: Required by contractor, Median moisture check tc 1) City of Carlsbad - 1) NBS/Lowry TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY 3teve-n-77. Koh,North County Branch Manager .3 I . J' Testing Engineers-San Diego . . A Division of'United States Testing Company, Inc. y RECEIVED 1~ offmi 3467 Kurtz St,PO BOX 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 2 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 JAN 071988 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS MUNIPALPROJECTS DIVISION DATE OV TEST 12/9-I5/87. . S LOCATION Carlsbad '. FILE , _5295 - PROJECT College Blvd Project #3188 LA o. No:_087-654 - DATE OF REPORT 12/23187 CONTRACTOR . . TEST NO . LO C A TI ON . IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE . DRY MAX. DRY . DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE W R EMARK S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. (sidewalk) . . . 533 El Camino Real 120'NofCollege.blvd 10.1 7.3 123.9 141.0 90 . 88 Does_ndt _comply (sidewalk). 534 El Camino Real 60'Nof College _Blvd 19.7 17.5 106.3 112.0. 90 95 _Complies 12-9 NUCLEAR DENSITY ,. S . . . . _. . . ... . (sidewalk)- 535 EI Camino. Real 0+130Eof College Blvd ' 5.1 .. 7.3. 128.1 _.. .141.0.. 90 . 91 'Complies (sidewalk) . . - 536 El. Camino Real 0+080E_of College Blvd 7.7 . 7.3 125.1 141.0 90 . 89 Does not comply (sidewalk) . . . . . 537 El Camino Real Q+030EofCollegeBlvd 10.7 .7.3 111.3- 118.0 90 95 . Canpliés L2-10 538'sidewalk 83+00E' lane , _____. __- 26.3 23.5 87.0 __..- 104.0 ___.. 90..'.... 84 _. Thesno•aiip1y 539 sidewalk 73+50Elane.,___.. _.. :21.0 20.5'.: 96.3.. . 108.0: .90 90 _. Complies 540 . sidewalk_66+5.0_E_ lane , .. _-. 23.6 23.5 _. .9,.l 104.0 90 86 Does _not.canply 541 55+50 sidewalk E lane - 22.4 23.5 9.2.8 104.0 90 89 Doesnot comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THC.REPORTINO OF . F A C T U A L D A T A D E R I V E D F R O M TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS :SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR J O B C O N T R O L . - College Blvd Project fl3188 S Page 2 TEST NO. : L 0 C AT I 0 N IN. PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv, DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT .RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S • 542 Telephone line crossing iliitersection College Falccnar Airport. Rd. of 4.7 8.5 127.5 138.0 95'. 93 Does not comply 543 Telephone crossing Intersection of College .& Palcinar Airport Rd. 4.1 S 8.5 S 131.0 138.0 • 95 95 S Canplies TESTING ENGINEERS .SAN DIEGO LC S S •. S REVIEWED BY 1) City of Carlsbad S 1) NBS/Lowry S S S S S 5 • . Fteven~P.!Kobzeè' . S •. 5S5 5 5 North County Branch Manager S S - ( ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego I4c A Division of United States Testing Company Inc. . 3467 Kurtz St, p 0 Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 I —) •2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 S. DAILY RESULTS - EN. PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST--10/30/87 . .. . . LOCATION Carlsbad, CA . FILE No '087-52.7 . - . .PROJECT College Blvd. Improvements LAB No 5259 DATE OF REPORT_November 18, 1987.* CONTRACTOR TEST No. I C. A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. - 10/3 NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: . . . . . . College Blvd. Stat. 53+00 -. . . . . . . . 148 12' W center line W lane . . 146.4 .152.6 . 95 .. 96 Complies 149 College Blvd. Stat. .55+00 . . :1467. 152.6 95 96 Complies 14' W center line W lane 150 College Blvd 57+00 16' W center 145.2 152.6 95 95 Complies line W. lane 151 College blvd. 60+00 15' W center . . 14.3.4 152.6 .95 94 Does not omply . line W lane . . . . 152 College blvd. 62+00 14' W . center . 142.8 152.6 95 94 Does not comply line West Lane, 153 Retstl5'60+00 15' W centerline . 144.8 152.6 95 95 Complies Retest1/ W lane .. i N t' 154 College blvd. 60+00. centerline . jrjjj 147.7 152.6 5. 97 Complies W lane 155 College blvd 53+00 Centerline NOV 241987140 5 15-2.6 95 92 Does not comply 156 College blvd Retest#l5 146 7 15.2 .6 - 95 96 Complies Retestl1 155 St-at.53+00 centerline W lane 1UNICIPALPIOJECT DIVISION THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 2 TEST No. L 0 f KI IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY . MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST.. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/3L NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: 157 College blvd. Stat. 55+00 center S 148.7... 152.6 95 97 Complies line W. lane . 158 College blvd. Sta t.. 57+00* Center . 146.0 152.6 95 ..96 Complies line W lane 159 Retest .1/1-5.Stat. 60+00:15' .W centerline W. lane . . 149.7 152.6 95 96 Complies Retest fl5 160 College blvd. 62+00 14' W center 146.5 152.6 95 . 96 Complies lp line W. lane 161 College blvd. Stat. 6.2+00 center . . 146.2 152.6 95 96 Complies line W. lane 162 College blvd. Stat. 64+00 15' . 146.0. 152.6 95 96 Complies W centerline W. lane . 163 'College blvd. Stat. 64+00 center . 145.8 152.6 95 .96 Complies line W. lane . . 164 College blvd. 66+00 9' W center, . 146.1 152.6 .95 . 96 Complies line W lane 1 65 College blvd. 66+00 Centerline w lane . 151.7 152.6 95 99 Complies 166 College blvd. Stat. 68+60 10' 150.6 152.6 95 99 Complies W of centerline W lane . . 167 College Blvd. 68+00 centerline.. 146.1 152.6 95 96 Cdrnplis . Wlane 168 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 10'E . centerline.W lane 141.4 152.6 95 93 . . oot comply College blvd Stat 53+00.'10' E 169 centerline_W_lane 145 7 152,6 95 96 Complies 170 College blvd. 55+00 left turn 147.3 152.6 95 97 Complies S W. . lane lane COLLEGE BLVD. 'IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 3 TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 1.0/30 NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT Sat 55+00 6' E 171 Co llege ::i "1ne w .144 .,9 .152 ..,6 95 95 Complies Ce lv6' E of centerline 172 57+00 W. lane 149.7 152 6 95 98 Complies College blvd.' Stat 57+00 left . 173 turn.lane W. lane . . 144.9 . 152.6 .95 , 95 Complies College blvd. Stat. 59+00. 12' E ' 174 of centerline W. lane . . ' 152.5 152.6 95 100 Complies College blvd. Stat. 62+00 12''E 175 of centerline W. Lane 151.9 152.6 ' 95 100 Complies 176 College blvd. Stat. 64+00 14' .E ' of centerline W. lane 148.5 152.6 95 97 Complies 177 College blvd Stat 66+00 12' E 147 8 152 6 95 97 Complies of centerline W. lane 178 College blvd. Spat. 68+60 10' E . , ' 147.4 152.6 95 97 . Complies of centerline W. lane College blvd. Stat. 68+60 15' E 179 of centerline E. lane ' '147.3. . .152.6 95 ' 97 Complies College blvd.. Stat.' 68±60, ' 180 7' E of centerline E. lane ' ' 146 • 2 152 6 ' 95 96 Complies College blvd. Stat. 66+00 T.5 E . 181 of centerline E. lane 149.0 152.6 '95 98 ' Complies 182 College blvd. Stat. 66+Q,0 'center . . 145.7' 1526 ' 95 96 Complies line E. lane 183 ' College blvd Stat. 64+00 12' E . . ' 147.2 , 152.6 95 96 Complies 'centerline of E lane 184 College blvd. Stat. 64+00 center . 'line E. lane 145.0 152.6 95 95 Complies COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 1 1/18/87 Page 4 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT, PERCENT No. 'l A ON PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST.- DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. L0/3( NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT College blvd Stat 62±0010' 185 E of centerline E. lane 150 ..8 .152.6, 95 99 Complies 186 College blvd Stat 62±00 center 145 8 152 6 95 961 Complies line E lane 187 College blvd, Stat, 60±00 15' E 150.8 152.6 95 99 Complies of center line E. lane 188 College blvd, 60+00 centerline 145.8 152.6 95 : 96 . Complies E_lane 189 College blvd Stat 57+00 12 150 8 152 6 95 99 Complies E of centerline E. lane 190 Collge blvd. Stat. 57±00 center .151.'7 152.6 95 99 Complies line _E_lane 191 College -blvd, 5+00 131 E of . 146.0 152.6 95 96 Complies centerline_E.lane 192 College blvd Stat 55±00 center line E. lane 147.2 152 6 95 97 Complies 193 College blvd Stat 53+00 13' E centerline E. lane - 146.21 152.6 95 96 Complies 19 College blvd Stat 53±00 center .149.6 152.6 95 98 Complies line E lane 195 College blvd Stat 53±00 left 149 5 152 6 95 98 Complies tur;n lane E lane 196 College blvd. Stat. 55+00,15' W 1456 152.6 95 95 Complies of centerline E lane 197 College blvd. S.tat. 57+00 14' 147.8 152.6 95 96 Complies ____ W of centerline E lane COLLEGE BLVD.. IMPROVEMENTS 1II18I87 Pp 'S TEST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY RELATIVEACE. REL. COMP. - R E M A R K S MOIST.— DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/3(NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT: :198 College Blvd. Stat. 60+00 .14 1 W - of centerline E lane 150.7 152.6 95 Complies 99 199 College blvd..Stat 62+00 12' W 147 8 of center E. lane . . ". . . 152 6 95 96 Complies 200 College blvd. 64+00 13 W of 1472 ' 152.6 95 97 . Complies centerline E lane 201 College blvd. Stat. 66+00left . . 148.7 152.6 95 . 97 Complies turn Lane E.lane , 202 College blvd. 68+70 left turn 148.4 152.6 95 97 Complies lane E. lane . 203 College blvd. Stat. 53+00 15,' W of centerline W lane . 145.6 . 149.3 . 95 98 Complies 204 'College blvd Stat. 55 -00 12' . W_ofcenterline___W ___lane 142.5 149.3 95 95 ' Complies College blvd.. Stat.' 57+00 14' W 205 of center line W lane . . . 148.8 , 149.3 .95 Complies 99 College blvd. Stat. 60+00 12' W ' 206 of centerline W lane .. 144.4 149.3 95 97 Complies 207 'College blvd. Stat. 62+00 14' ' 144.8 149.3 95 ' 97 Complies W of' centerline W lane 208 College blvd. Stat. 64+00 14' W ' 146.6 149.3 95 ' .98 Complies of centerline W lane , 209 College blvd. Stat. 66+00 12' W of centerline W lane , 142.6 149.3 95 96 Complies 210 College blvd.. Stat. 68+60 14' W of Centerline W lane 142.9 ', 149.3 ' 95 . 95 0 Complies 211 College blvd. Stat. 68+60 40'' 141.9 '149.3 95 ' 95 Complies E of centerline E lane I ______ ' COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 6 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Dnv PERCENT PERCENT No.LOC ATION PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R EMARKS . MOIST. . DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 1.0/31 NUCLEAR DENSITY ASPHALT 212 College blvd Stat 66+00 18' E of centerline E lane . S 142 0 149.3 95 95 Complies College blvd. Stat. 64+00 16' E 213 of' centerline E lane 142.3 149.3 95 99 Complies 214 College.blvd. Stat. 62+00 15' E ' 143.6 149.3 95 ' :96 Complies of centerline E lane 215 College blvd. Stat. 60+00 14'E . . . ' 145.5 149.3 95 " 98 Complies of centerline. E lane . 216 College blvd. Stat. 57+00 10' E , of centerline E. lane ' 143:5 149.3 96 Complies 217 College blvd. Stat. 55+00 12' E 144.0 149.3 95 97 Complies of. centerline E lane . . 218 blvd. Stat. 55+00 left l College' 143.4 149.3 95 96 'Complies eft turn lane E lane -College blvd. Stat. 53+00 8' E 219 of centerline E lane . 147.0 149.3'. 95 99 Complies 220 College blvd. Stat. 53+00-left. 145.1 149.3 95 98 Complies turn laneE' lane S . TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY Kirk P Ammerman North County Branch Manager • flJi Testing Engineers-San Diego RECEIVED A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641. 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 S FE8 02 1988 - MuNIC'ALPROJECT9 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DIVISION DATE OF TEST 1/21/88 525 . . .,, LOCATION (v1ch . FILE No _________________ PROJECT_College Blvd, Improvements LA e. tb o. 088-129 DATE OF REPORT_1/7S/Rb CONTRACTOR N L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DaY' DENSITY PERCENT REL. Coup. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST.. DENSITY REQUIRED Coup. Centerline of narrow portion 555 Median 50'N of S end Depth 12" 20.6 14-0 89 f 117 0 * 77 * Centerline of narrow portion 556 '0'N of S end Median Depth 6" 19.1 14.0 96.3 117.0 * 83 * Median 50"1N of S end Depth 2" 557 centerline of narrow portion 18.8 14.0 ;' .993 11.0 * 85 Median 350'N .6f .'S end 2'E 558 of centerliner. Depth 1211 19 5 14 0 98.5.'117 0 * 85 * Mdian 350'N of S end 21 E 559 spf centerline Depth 6" 20.0 -14.0 99.3 117.0 * 85 .Median-.350'N of S 'end'-:2'E 560 of'.centerline Depth 2" . 20.3 14.0 • 87.3 117.0 * 84 * Median 500'S of N end centerline., j median .between planting areasiDepth12 ' 23 9 15.0 95.7 113 0 * 85 * Median 500'S of N end centerline 562' median,between planting.-area 'depth 6'! 30.0 • 15.0 90..7 .113.0 *; 80 * S Mçdian 500'S of N end centerline 563 median between planting area depth 2" 28.9 15.0 90.6 113.0 * 80 * Median. 350'S of N end, CL of • , . • S 564 median depth 12" - 16.9 15.0 101.3 117.0 * 86 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACT U A L D A T A D E R I V E D F R O M TESTS MAO BY TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOD CONTROL. Collpgp Blvd Imnrvmrit- TEST No. L 0 C A TI 0 N IN - - PLACE MoisT, OPTIMUM MOIST. . IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY ' PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIREO PERCENT RELATIVE CoMP. R E M A R }< S 565 Median 350'S of N end CL of median depth 6" 16.1 15.0.- 104.5 117.0 * 89 * 566 Median 350'S of N end CL.'of median depth 2" 17.9 15.0 93.6 117.0 * 80 * 567 Median 50'S of N end depth 12" . 21.8 15.0 95. . 113.0 . 84 * 59ji Median 50'S of N end depth 6" 21.1 15.0 95.5 113.0 * 84 * . 569 Median 50'S of N end depth 2" 20.7 15.0 96.6 113.0 * 85 * * For Information Only Note:. All Tests. Done Per Contraçtor . . . Rcguc3t .- tc TESTING ENGINEERS . SAN DIEGO 1) NBS7Lowry - REVIEWED BY Steven P. Ko &f North County Branch Manager > scol tfM, fh1Li Testing Engineers -San Diego 'Z. A Division of United States Testing Company Inc I 3467 Kurtz St P0 Box 80985 San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS -IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE or rc.r 6/17j8,23,25/87 ***NUCLEAR DENSITIES*** LOCATION City of Carlsbad FILE NO 5259 PRoJECT College Blvd Improvements Proiect #3188 LAS No 087-355 DATE OF REPORT 7/2/87 CONTRACTOR__________________________________________________ N L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. Coup. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP.. Station 62+45 at E.D.L. Line 1 Center. Line Trench El. 46.9 1 . 18.1 14.0 104.9 116.0 90 90 Complies Station 61+00 at E.D.L. Line " : 2 Center Line Trench El. 471 .18.2 11.4 113.2 125.0 90 .. 91 Complies I.Station 59+15 at E.D.L. Drain : 3 Center Line Trench El.. 47.5' 18.3 17.5 107.4 111.8 90 96 Complies Station 55+00 at E D L Drain V 4 Center Line Trench El, 51.0' 22.2 20.5 94.4- 104.0 90 91 Complies Station 63+15 at E.D.L. Drain Line 5' Center Line Trench El. 47.5' 18.5 14.0 106.4 116.0 90 92 Complies Station 58+00 Water Mail Line 6 Center Line Trench El. 49.01. .' 15.9 16.9 106.2 123.1 90 92 Complies Station 70+00 E.D.L. Line 7 1- S Center Line El. 45' 12.6 .14.0 . 113.4 116.0 90. ' 98 Complies Station 71+00 E.D.L. Line 8 it S Center Line El. 39.5' . 17.6 20.5 105.3 107.5 90 .98 Complies • Station 66+25 E.D.L. Drain Line -' . . 9 1'.S Center Line Trench' El. 471 - 47.5 18.5 17.5 100.6 111.5 90 90 Complies Station 67+64.75 E D L Drain Line 10 Center Line Trench, El. 47' . 20.0 1 17.5 '100.7 111.5 90 90 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM . TESTS MADE SY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. ' THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY e . 'Colleqe Blvd. Improvements Proj. #3188 Pa6p 2 EST -. LOCATION " ' ' ' IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST..' ' IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE comp. R E M A R K $ • 11 Center Line Trader El. 491 - 49.5 Station 67+58 E.D.L. Line 18.7 '. 17.5 106.6 111.5' 90- 96 Complies • 12 2 -N Center Line El. 45' Station 68+50 E.D.L. Line 23.2 20.5 , 98.7 107.5 90 , 92 , ' Complies 13 'E.D.L. Drain Line El. 47' •' ' Station 68+40 E.D.L. Line '15.1 14.0 , 108.0 116.0' 90. '93 Complies , 14 , Station 67+94.75 E D L Line 1,, Center Line Trench El.' 471 15.7 ' 14.0 105.7 116.0 90' 91 Complies Center Line Trench El. 31 1 - 31.5 1 Station 73+48 E.D.L.' Line " ' 14.6 14.0' ' 96.9 107.5 ' 90 ' 90 Complies 116Center Line Trench El. 38' Station 71+70 E.D.L. Line 18.3 ' '14.0 ' 98.4 107.5 ' 90 ' - 92' Complies -I, i's • - ' ' . ''• - ' ' . ' RECEiVED ' ' ' ' TESTING ENGINEERS.SAN DIEGO ' • ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' • '• ' • ' ' ' ' REVIEWED BY : 1) City of Carlsbad' JUL 07 1987 : ,, ,, ' ' ' ' ' '''• REY N BS/LO WRY Abert F deBerardinis North County Branch Manager , ' ' DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST _____________ LOCATION Carlsbad California FILE NO. 5259 . PROJECT-College _Blvd, _Improvements _Project#31RR LAB.,NO. . DATE OF REPORT._ 9124187 CONTRACTOR TEST No L 0 C A T 10 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. . REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 6/26 17 EDL Line Station 75+35 1'S center line trench 16.5 20.5 105.3 107.5 90 98 Complies EDL Line Station 76+00 center line 18 trench@westendconc.ofstormdrain 17.7 20.5 104.4 107.5 90 97 Complies EDL Line Station 76+60 . 19 2'Scenterlinetrench 21.8 20.5 97.6 107.5 90 91 Complies EDL Drain Line Station 78+44 20 1'S center line oftrench __. 22.0 20.5 98.5 107.5 90 92 Complies EDL Drain Line Station 79+50. 21 Cénerlineoftrench 19.3 17.5 106.2 111.5 90 95 Complies EDL Drain Line Station 81+90 22 Centerlineoftrench 20.7 20.5 98.1 107.5 90 91 Complies 7/1 23 14" Waterline (S side) Station 74+701'Nof center line . 20.3 20.5 102.5 107.5 90 95 0, Complies 14" Waterline. (S side) 24 Station75+80centerline 17.2 20.5 105.7 107.5 90 98 Complies 14" Waterline (S side) . . . . . 25 Station74+001'Nofcenterline 14.0 20.5 104.9 107.5 90 98 Complies 7/2 On E bound side College Blvd. at . . 26 * 2' _E center line of Man Hole #6(Lid) 20.8 18.5 95.4 110.0 90 87 Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM ls TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. * Beginning of Punch List Items Cnllecie R1v1. Tmnrnvementc Prniert 31R TEST No LOCATION IN PLACE OPTIMUM Mo,sr. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R £ M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIREO COMP. 7/2 On E bound side College Blvd. at. . . . .27 3' N center line of Man Hole #7 _26.O 18.5 95.0 110.0 90 86 Does not comply On E bound side of College at Man Hole 28 #8 23' N centerline of Man Hole 29.5 18.5 92.9 110.0 90 85 Does not comply 7/3 [DL Drain Line Station 39+05. 29 Center line of Trench 63' B.T.C. .11.9 . 14.0 104.3 116.5 90 90 Complies EDL Drain Line Station 39+00 . . 30 Center line of Trench 4' B.T.C. 10.4 .14.0 105.5 116.5 . 90 91 Complies 7/8 Man Hole #10 Station 28+30 . . . 31 4' N renter Lin of Man Hole 5 1 R.T.C. . 11.2 11.5 99.3 121.0 90 82 Does not comply Man Hole.#10 Station 28+30 . . . 32 4' N center line of Man Hole 5' B.T.C. 11.0 11.5 -98.5 121.0 . 90 81 - Does not comply Man Hole. #10 33' B.T;C. . . 33 . 31-'_S _center _line _of Man Hole 14.9 11.5 91.1 12.1.0 90 _. 75 Ones _not _comply Man Hole #10 33' B.T.C. . . . . . . . . . 34 53'S_center line of Man Hole 11.8 11.5 .95.0 121.0 90 79 Doesnotcomply 7/9 Valve. Cluster East bound lane . . 35 Station 27+68 Finish sub grade -.16.9 .13.0 108.2. ..120.0 .90 90 .Complies Valve Cluster East bound-lane back- . . . . . 35-BU Station27+68Finishsubgrade _uptes 18.0 13.0 107.7 .120.0 90 90 Complies. Valve Clusters East bound lane .. . . . . 36 Station 40+56.6" below -finish .subgrad 1.2.0 14.0 106.9..116.5 90 92 Complies Valve Cluster East bound lane . . . 37 . Station 19+156"belowfinishsubgrad 18.4 13.5 108.3 118.0 90 .92 Complies. Value Cluster East bound lane . 38 Station13+001 ___. .16.1 13.0 109.5 120.0 90 91 Complies 7/13 Water Valves East side of College . . . . . . . .. . . - . 39 Station 53+20 Probe test _Probe d&Dug down. Just PipeB ddingSand,No _fill. . Probe Okay Valve Cluster East side of College 40 Station 48+20 .9.5 8.8 123.9 .134.4 90 . 92 Complies Is College Blvd. Improvements Project #3188 Page 3 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM Molsr. IN PLACE DRY MAX. OnY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY -----REQUIRED COMP. 7/13 Man Hole #6 E bound side of College 26A 13+' S of face of curb 3' B.T..C. 21.8 14.0 105.3 116.5 90 90 Complies-RETEST OF #26 Man Hole #7 E bound side of College . . . 27A 3'S center line-of-Man Hole Lid 3'BT( 18.5 18.5 100.6 110.0 90 . 92 Complies-RETEST OF #27 Man. Hole #8 E bound side of College 28A 2' W of center line of Man Hole Lid 22.9 18.5 102.1 110.0 90 93 Complies-RETEST OF #2R Man Hole #9 S side 3', B.T.C. 41 3' W of center line of Man Hole Lid 22.1 19.0 .102.8 .111.0 90 93 Complies ' 7/14 14" Water Line S side . 42 Station 87+00 center line trench 17.7 -20.5 99.8 "107.5 90 93 Complies 14" Water Line Station 85+53 43 'Center Line of trench El. 168.0 20.0 20.5 -99.9 107.5 90 93 Complies 14" Water line Station 75+00 44 Center line trench E1.221 ' 18.9 20.5 99.3 107.5 90 92 Complies 14" Water line ,Station 77+88 45 Center line trench El. 204 . 21.7 20.5 98.8 . 107.5 90 ' 92 Complies 14" Water', line , Station 81+50 . . .' 46 Center line El. 189 ' 20.3 20.5 96.8 107.5 90 90 Complies 14" Water line Station'90+00 ' 47 El. 146' ' 20.0 17.5 100.7 111.5 90 90 Complies 7/15 S side of Man Hole #10 3' S centerline 31A Man Hole Lid Also represents Retest 32 12.0 11.5 113.6 121.0 ' 90 94 Complies-RETEST #31 &3 W side of Man Hole #10 3' S centerlin . . ' 33A of Man Hole Lid also represents #34 12.8 11.5 112.7 121.0 90 93 Complies_RETEST#.,&3L W side at. Man Hole #11 4' B.T.C. 48 3' W of center line of Man Hole Lid' 17.3 11.5 109.4 121.0 90 90 Complies S side at Man Hole #12 3 B.T.C. 49 4' S. center line of Man Hole Lid 15.2 '_11.5..110.4 121.0 90 91 Complies 7/21 14" Water Line Station 90+91 50 1' S center line Trench El. 137' 18.7 20.5 99.0 107.5. 1 90. 92 1 Complies ls College Blvd. Improvements Project #3188 . Paqe 4 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM Moisr. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 7/21 14"Water Line Station 90+91 Back up *59.BU 11 S center line trench EL. 137' to 50 18.2 20.5 100.2 107.5 90 93 Complies 14" Water Line Station 92+00 52 Center line of trench El. 135' 18.7 20.5 99.5 107.5 .90 93 Complies 14" Water Line Station 93+97 53 1' S center line of trench El. 128' 15.0 13.0 110.2 119.0 90 93 Complies 14" Waterline Station 95+00: . 54 Center line of Trench El. 116'. 18.2 17.5 .101.2 111.5 90 90 Complies 7,'24 East bound lang finish sub, grade 2 BT 55 Station 3+00 7' S center line*of'roadw3 10.2 ' 92.0 112.1 122.5 90 .92 Complies East bound lane finish sub grade . 56 Station 79+60 11' N center line 10.1 12.0 109.8 122.5 90 90 - Complies East bound lane finish sub grade 57 Station 3+44 7' N center line 10.7 12.0 110.8 122.5 90 . _91 Complies East bound lane finish sub grade . - . . •. 58 Station 3+24 11' .N center line . 8.7 .12.0 111.6 122.5 .90 91 Complies East bound lane Station 7+00 59 1' N center line finish sub grade 9.5 11.5 117.2 .124.0 90 95 Complies East bound side Station 10+16 . . 60 6' S center line finish sub grade 14.7 11.5 112.3 .124.0 90 91 Complies. East bound side Station 10+40 . . . . . .61 9' N center line finish sub grade 12.6 11.5 113.6 124.0 90 92 Complies East bound side Station 2+75 62 . 10' S center line finish sub grade 13.1 11.5 115.4 122.5 90 94 Complies East bound side Station 2+85 63 14' N center line finish sub grade 13.3 11 .5 111.6 .. 122.5 90 91' '. Complies . West bound lane Station 2+83 64 18' 5 center line finish sub grade 10.4 11.5 117.5 124.0 90 95 Complies West bound lane Station 8+50 65 1 6' N center line finish sub' grade 11.1 .11.5 113.0 124.0 90. .91 . Complies ls ('r1iorio Il,d Tmni-'rt,omonf c Prrior+ *1PP p;np c TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE. REMARKS COMP. MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED 7/24 :West .bound lane Station 14+50 . . 66 101 N center line finish sub grade _15.8 11.5 115.6 124.0.. 90 93 Complies West bound lane Station 18+95 67 4' S center line finish sub grade 8.1 11.5 110.9 124.0 90 . 90 Comolies 7/25 East bound lane Station 29+75 . 68 10 N! center line finish sub grade 10.8 13.0 108.4 120.0 .90 90 Complies East bound lane Station 29+48 69 7' S center line finish sub grade 10.1 13.0 112.2 130.0 90 94 Complies East bound lane Station 31+45 . 0 70 7' S center line finish cub grade 10.9 13J0 1097 121L0 90 91 Cnmplies East bound lane Station 32+00 71 . 7' 5 center line finish sub grade 11.3 13.0 _108.4 120.0 90 - 90 Complies East bound lane Station 32+50 . 72 Centerlinefinishsubgrade 9.4 13.0 110.5 120.0 90 92 Complies East bound lane Station 32+40 73 7'N_ center _line. finish _grade _sub 9.4 13.0 110.4 120.0 90 92 flnmp1ic East bound lane Station 33+00 . .. .. 74 71 Ncenterlinefinishsubgrade 7.9 13.0 111.1 120.0 90 93 .Complies,,. East bound lane Station 34+25 75 101S center line finish sub grade 10.5 13.0 106.8_ 120.0 90 89 Ebes not comply East bound,lane . Station 34+75 0 76' 8'Wcenterlinefinishsubgrade 8.5 13.0 109.7 120.0 90 91 Complies East bOund lane Station 35+60 77 1'Scenterlinefinishsubgrade 9.4 .13.0 . 107.9 120.0 90 90 Complies East bound lane Station 36+00 78 1'Scenterlinefinishsubgrade 9.0 13.0 108.0 120.0 0 90 90 Complies East bound lane Station 37+40 79 3 _Ncenter.linefinishsubgrade .93 13.0 .107.1 120.0 90 89 0, Does not comply East bound lane Station 40+00 80 center line of road finish sub _grade 10.0 11.5 110.0 122.5 90 . 90 Complies College Blvd Improvements Project #3188 Page 6 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. West Bound Lane 3' S... Center Line 81 Station 39+85 Finish Sub Grade :8.9 11.5 109.7 122.5 90 90 Complies West Bound Lane Center.Line Station 39+70 Finish Sub Grade . 10.7 11.5 115.1 .122.5 90 94 Complies West Bound Lane Station 35+50 4' S 83 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 8.0 11.5 . 110.9 122.5 90 . 91 Complies West Bound Lane Station 35+65 Center 84 Line Finish Sub Grade 9.1 11.5 .111.7 122.5 90 91 Complies West Bound Lane Station -'29+40 9'. N . . 85 Center LineFinish Sub Grade 11.5 111.0 122.5 90 .i Complies West Bound Lane Station 29+55 10' . 86 S Center Line Finish Sub. Grade 6.6 . 11.5 115.5 . 1.22.5 90 94 Complies West Bound Lane Station 28+99 Center 87 Line Finish Sub Grade 10.7 11.5 113.8 122.5 90 93 Complies West Bound Lane Station 28+89 1 ' S . . . . . . . 88 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 10.8 13.0 113.1 120.0 90 94 . Complies West Bound Lane Station 25+42 61 7S . . . 89 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 9.2 13.0 108.8 120.0 90 91 Complies East Bound Lane Station 27+50 9' N . . . ., . 90 Center Line Finish Sub Grade . 8.9 11.5 112.5 . 121.0 90 . . .93 Complies 91 Line Finish Sub Grade 11.8 East Bound. Lane Station 27+60 Center 11.5 109.9 121.0 90 91 . Crmplic Break in Median Station 28+05 Center . . . 92 Line. Finish Sub Grade 11.2 11.5 .109.6 121.0 .90 91 Complies West Bound Lane Station 28+40 Center . . . 93 Line F inish Sub Grade 8.0 11.5 112.0 121.0 90 . 90 Complies. • East Bound Lane Station 28+40 51 N- 94 Center Line Finish Sub Grade: 9.3 11.5 111.1 121.0 90 92 Complies ,. East Bound Lane Station 28+10 3' . . . . . . . . 95 Center Line Finish Sub Grade . 12.8 11.5 115.3 121.0 90 .95 Complies . Colleqe Blvd. Improvements Project #3188 Page 7 TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N - -__- IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. - R E M A R K S East Bound Lane Station 12+20 12' 5 ' ' ' 96 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 12.5 13.0 108.0 120.0 90 90 Complies East Bound Lane Station 12+00 2' N 97 Center Line Finish Sub Grade. 10.8 13.0 108.4 120.0 90 91 Complies East Bound Lane Station 12+25 Center 98 Line Finish Sub Grade . 15.2 1.3.0 107.4 120.0 90 90 Complies East Bound Lane Station 18+00 9' N 99 ('nter ( me Finish Sub Grade 10.0 _13.0 .109.0 120.0 , 90 91 Complies East Bound Lane 'Station 19+50 4' S 100 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 12.0 13.0 109.6 120.0 ' 90 ' 91 Complies East Bound Lane Station 22+00 Center 101 Line Finish Sub Grade ' '12.6 13.0 _J10.6' 12.0 '' 90 ' 92 Complies , East Bound Lane Station 4+60 9' E 102 Center Lin Finish Sub Grade ' 9.1 11.5 110.0 122.5 90 90 Cmp.lies East Bound Lane Station 4+60 7' E 103 Center Line 'Finish Sub Grade '9.3 11.5• 109.7 122.5 90 90 Complies East Bound Lane Station 4+60 Center 104 Line Finish Sub Grade . , 12.3 11.5 109.6 122.5 '.90 90 Complies East Bound Lane College Station 4+68 105 i' c Ctr]inp Finich Sub Grac1 10 11.9 110.4 122J gp qn Cnmplic East Bound Lane College Station 4+68 106 Center Line Finish Sub Grade 8.9 :11.5 110.0 12.2.5 ' 90 90 .Complies East Bound Lane College Station 7+00 107 l.' .N Ctrline Depth of Trans. 8" 11.3 - 11.0 114.9 124.0 90 9' - Complies. 1) City of-Carlsbad Attn: Pat Entezari 1) NBS/Lowry Attn: Kurt Gi-erlich TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY - Kirk P. Ammerman North County Branch Manager — (J Testing Engineers—San Diego I A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St,PO Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 -" 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 7/27 - 7/31/87 LOCATION CityofCarlsbad FILE No. 5259 PROJECT _Improvements_to_College_ Blvd. . LAB. NO. 087-450 DATE OF REPORT 10-20-87 CONTRACTOR 0 TEST NO. - L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S - MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. -. 7/27 Nuclear Densities East bound lane 108 Station 3+008'S_of Center line 11.2 11.5 110_6 122_5 90 90 Complies East bound lane 109 Station3+3712'SofCenter _line 9_7 11 .5 1141 122_5 90 93 Complies West bound lane 110 Station _7+40 _11'N___ofCenter_Lind 10_8 11 _5 118_3 124_0 90 97 Complies West bound lane 111 Station 8+25__6' _S _of___ Center Line 11 _3 11.5 111.9 124__0 90 90 Complies West bound lane . . . 112 Station10+206'Sof _Centerline 11__1 11__5 111 _4 124_0 90 91 Complies East bound lane .. 113 Station14+07Center _line 11.0 11.5 109.7 122.5 90- 90 0 Complies 7/28 NuclearDensities 114 ForceMain _Station __83+90 19_1 10_5 100__0 117__5 90 85 Does not _comply 115 ForceMainStation84+00 18_0 10_5 105_4 117_5 90 90 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED 'PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. i-0 Collecie Blvd. Imorovements Paae 2 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMAR KS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. Force Main Station 84+40 116 271 N of Valve @ S end of S line 17.9 10.5 102.2 117.5 90 87 Does not comply Force Main Station 86+40 117 27' N of Valve @ S end of S line 16.2 10.5 106.5 117.5 90 91 Complies Storm Drain : 24','S of SE corner 118 Deck 0-8" below top Of ditch 24.9 10.5 95.3 - 117.5 90 81 Does not comply • Storm Drain 24' S of SE corner 119 Deck 0-8 below top ofditch 25.2 10.5 97.8 117.5 .90 83 .Does not comply EDL Line • 1' below finish grade • . 120 Station84+65centerline 20.4 17.5 106.0 11.1.5 .90 95 Complies EDL Line 1 1' below finish grade 121 Station84+65centerline 19.5 17.5 106.9 - 111.5 90 96 Complies • EDL Line 1' below existing grade . 122 Station90+00 23.0 17.5 100.3 111.5 90 90 Complies EDL Line 1' below existing grade : 123 Station 90+0G. 25.5 17.5 98.7 111.5 90 89 Doesnotcomply EDL Line 1' above existing grade . 124 Station 90+005 side of stake EL. 48 17.7 17.5 98.3 111.5 90 88 Doesnotcomply Street Drive Crossing . . 125 1"below _finishgrade • 26.4 17.5 96.1. 111.5 90 86 Doesnotcomply 7/29 NuclearDensities - ClassIIBase East bound lane of College 126 Station _2+95 1st lift 4.2 5.0 124.9 137.0 95 91. Doesnotcomply EDL Line S half El Camino Real . 127 Station _98+95 center line trend 17.9 11.5 110.9 122.0 90 91 Complies EDL Line S half El Camino Real . . • 128 Station98+90centerline _trend 19.3 11.5 110.4 122.0 90 91 . Complies EDL Line S half El Camino Real . 129 Station 98+23 center line'-5.1 5.0 127.6 137.0 90 1 93 Complies College Blvd. Improvements Page 3 TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. EDL Line S half El Camino Real 130 Station 99+00 Center line 4.3 5.0 130.8 137.0_ 90 96 .Complies 7/30 Nuclear Densities Class II Base . 52' S of 1st manhole 9" below finish 131 grade 31 N of curb 4.0. '5.0 124.5 137.0 95 91 Does not Comply East bound lane 9" blow finish grde 132 Station 42+60 11" 5 center line 5.3 5.0 129.9 137.0 95 95 Complies East bound lane 9" below finish grad 133 Station 42+45 Center line 5.6 5.0 125.7 137.0 95 92 Doec not Comply Station 42+16 9" below finish grade 134 Center line (@ break) of Median 5.6 5.0 122.6 137.0 95 90 - Does not Comply Station 42+25 9" below finish grade - 135 Eastboundlane12'Scenterline 7.1 5.0 128.6 137.0 95 94 Does not Compl y Station 42+27 '9" below finish grade 136 East bound lane 12'5 center line 6.4 5.0 125.9. 137.0 .95 92 DoesnotComply Station 37+00 9° below finish grade 137 Eastboundlane10'Scenterline 4.3 5.0 136.6 137.0 95 100 Complies Station 37+25 9" below finish grade 138 East bound lane 3SF' _N centerline MH 4.9 5.0 128.5 137.0 95 94 DoesnotComply Station 37+27 9" below finish grade 139 East bound lane 3'NcenterlineMH 5.7 5.0 121.9 137.0 95 89, Doesnot.Comply Station 37+29 9" below finish grade 140 East bound lane 3'N centerline MH 5.2 5.0 123.2 137.0 95 90 DoesnotComply Station 29+35 East bound lane N of 141 center line 10-53-'_sofIsland 4.1 5.0 126.4 137.0 95 92 . DoesnotComply Station 29+30 East bound lane . 142 63-'Sof Island front ofcurb 5.0 5.0 127.1 137.0 . .95 93 DoesnotComply East bound lane 143 Station _29+00 Center line oflane 5.9 5.0 127.2 137.0 95 93. DoesnotComply Colleqe Blvd. Improvements Paqe 4 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY. . MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. East bound lane 7' N front of curb 144 Station 29+30 111 S center line 5.9 5.0. 130.6 137.0 95 95. Complies Station 28+00 . . . 145 Center line of Island 1st lift 5.4 5.0 122.6 137.0 95 90 Does not Comply Station 28+05 146 Center line of Island 1st lift . . 5.7 5.0 122.9 137.0 95 90 . Does not comply Station 28+00 . . . . . . .. . . 147 . Center Tine of Island New -count 5.9 5.0 119.3 137.0 . 95 87 Does not COmply Station 28+05 . . 148 Center line of Island New Count 5.6 5.0 120.1 137.0 95 88. Does not Comply . East bound lane of College 149 Station 28+00 71 N of center line 6.4 5.0 114.7 - 137.0 95 84 Does not Comply East bound lane . . 150 Station28+007'NofCenterline 6.2 5.0 127.7 137.0 95 93, DoesnotComply. East bound lane . . . 151 Station 28+00 10 1 5of _Centerline_. 5.9 5.0 130.3 137.0 95 95,. Complies East bound lane . ,. . 152 Station 27+80 Center line oflane 4.5 5.0 119.3 137.0 95 87 DoesnotComply. East bound lane 153 Station22+5310'Nofcenterline 3.8 5.0 129.6 137.0 95 95 Complies East bound lane . 154 Station 22+66 on -center line 3.8 5.0 122,5 137.0 95 89 Does not Comply East bound lane . . . 155. Station 23+00-Center line 3.5 5.0 122.4 137.0 95 89 DoesnotComply East bound lane . . . 156 Station 23+25_8'Sof center _line 5.1 5.0 118.0' 137.0 95 87 Does not_comply East bound lane . . . . 157 Station 16+50_7'Nof center line . 4.8 5.0. 11.6.1 137.0 '95 85 _. Doesnotcomply East bound lane 158 -Station 14+75 'center line' 4.3 5.0 124.6 137.0 95: 91 _'S Does' _not Comply College Blvd. Improvements Page 5 TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 52' W of East bound lane 159 Station 9+9010'Nof center line 5.4 5.0 134.5 137.0 95 98 Complies East bound lane 160 Station 14+1310'Sof center line .5.0 5.0 119.6 .137.0 .95 87 Doesnotcomply East bound lane . . 161 Station 14+1310'5of center line 4.2 :5.0 128.8 137.0 95 94 Does not comply East bound lane 162 Station6+919'Sofcenterline 4.3 5.0 132.6 137.0 95 97 Complies East bound lane 163 Station7+00centerline 3.7 5.0 118.0 137.0 95 86 Does not comply East bound lane 164 Station4+755'Sofcenterline 4.7 5.0 -117.2 137.0 95 86 Does not comply East bound lane 165 Station 41+50 9' N of center line . 5.1 5.0 128.2 137.0 95 94 Does not comply 7/31 . NuclearDensities . West bound lane 166 _ Station 52+501' below top ofcurb 8.1 .5.0 122.1 137.0 ,95 . 89. Doesnotcomply West bound lane . 167 Station 47+001' below top-of curb 7.3 5.0 126.9 137.0 95 93 Doesnotcomply East bound lane finish sub grade 168* 5'Sof center line El.53.4 17.9 17.5 105.5 111.5 90 95 . Complies West bound lane finish sub grade 169* 9'Sof center line.El.53.1 18.3 17.5 103.4 111.5 90 93 Complies Station 52+55 170 3'Sofcenterlinefinishbasegrade 5.2 7.0 135.2 138.5 95 . 98 Complies Station 50+50 171 2'S of-center line finish base grade 5.6 7.0 138.3 138.5 95 100 Complies U * = Sand Cone Densities ls 1L..Cfly of Carlsbad wry. TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY -p A.- . Kirk P. Ammerman North County Branch Manager ( 7t~i J Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619) 225-9641 -= 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (19) 757-024R S. DAILY RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE or rcs'r 08/04/87 ***NUCLEAR DENSITIES*** LOCATION FILE NO_5259 . . io.ccr nivu IIIlprr mr. .'.e. No O7-4_51 DATE or RE-PORT 1Q-23-87 CONTRACTOR L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PL..cc DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED . NUCLEAR DENSITIES: 172 Duct Bank N/S Sta 56+55 19.4 14.0 104.2 116 90 90 Complies Center line trench 173 Duct Bank N/S Sta. 59+50 17.7 14.0 106;9 116 90 92 Complies Center line trench- 174 Elect. Trench N, Side College Blvd. 62+flfl Center '159 14 104.5 116.0 90 90 Complies 175 Elect. Trench N Side College Blvd. 20.5 20.5 104.6 107.5 90 97 Complies Sta 63+00 Center line 176 Elect Trench N side College Blvd 4+40 Center line St. 24.2 20.5 100 6 107 5 90 94 Complies 177 Trench S Side College Blvd. 15.8 14.0 105.1 116.0 90 91 Complies Sta. 64+50 Center line 1-5 SAND -CONE: 178 Survey Stake 62+50 Elev. 248.MSL 15.3 14.0 113_5 118.2 90 96 Complies 179 Near Stake 61+00Elev. 247 MSL 10.9 18.5 97.2 106.3 90 91 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL. DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. COLtEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 1/3188 PAGE 2 TEST No L 0 C AT 10 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 8-5 SAND CONE: 180 Stake 58+50 Elev Approximately 11 ..2 -13.4 114.5 119.8 90 96 Complies 181 Near Stake 57 El approx. 51-2MS 18.6 17.0 96.6 106.4 9.0 . 91 Complies 182 Between Stake 56+00 & fire hy- 18.6 drent_Elev_Approx.252 17.0. 102.4 . 106.4 90 96 Complies 8-7 RING TEST PUNCH - LIST ITEM: 183 Down Slope Sta.-18-30 12.9 14.0 104.6 116.5 90 90 Complies 8-11 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . S 184 N Side at 30" Storm Drain 13.4 14.0 Sta.54+15 103.2 '116.5 90 89 Does not complies 185 N Side at 30" Storm Drain Sta. 54+ 5 12.5 14.0 105.8 116.5 90 91 Cp,plies TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO mw REVIEWED BY 1) City of Carlsbad JNB S / Low Kirk P. Ammerman, (C.E.) North County Branch Manager i J -San Diego Testing Engineers A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I=) 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY -RESULTS - IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 08/17/87 _____________ LOCATION City of Carlhd . 5259 ***NUCLEAR DENSITY** PROJECT 'College Blvd Improvement Project 113188 FILE No.______________________ . _______________________________________________________________ LAB. No. _-08 7-4 51 DATE OF REPORT-1 fl/ 7 3/R 7 .---.CONTRACTOR, rEsT No LO C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. -PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST.-. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP._- 8-17 NUCLEAR DENSITY: .. . - 186 Electr. Trench Sta 71+50 21.4 17.5 103.6 111.5 - 90 93 Complies Center line _Trench 187 St-a 73+10 Center line Trench 21.9 17.5 100.5 111.5 90 90 Complies 8-18 NUCLEAR DENSITY: 188 5-2+95 Center line WIB lane '.'.7 .3 8.5 134.7 140.0 95 . 96 Complies 52+75 14' N Center line 7.0 8.5 131.3 140.0 95 Corn-plies 189 W/ Rnd 190 52+75 Same hole Different depth 7.0 8.5 134.2 140.0 95 95 Complies of transmission W./Bnd Lane •Sta. 50+50 - 5.3 8.0 . -133.2 140.0 .95 95 -- . - - 191- Complies 192 12 1/2 S Center line Sta. 48+50 4.8 8.0 133.4 140.0 95 95 Complies 8.0 - 133.6 140.0 95 193 91S Center , S-ta. 8+40 . 5.9 95 Complies S Center line - - THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT //3188 PAGE 2 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. Dnv PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 CAT I 0 N• PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R KS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 8-18 NUCLEAR DENSITY: 194 Sta 46+50 3' S Centeir line 6.0 8.0 36.4 140.0 95 97 Complies 195 Sta. 46+70 4' S Center line 6.0 8.0 . 139.8 140.0 95 100 Complies 196 Sta. 44+55 12' S Center line 6.2 8.0 122.7. 140.0 95 88 Does not complies 197 W/Bnd lane Sta 44+55 . 5.5 8.0 124.9 140.0 95 89 Does not complies 9' c r.-i- lirip 198 W/Bnd lane Sta 44+50 7.1 '. 8.0 139.2 140.0 95 99 Complies Center line . . W/Bnd lane Sta 42+50. . - .. . .. 199 Center line Area Pumping 9 7 8.0 133 7 140 ..0 95 96 Complies 200 W/Bnd lane Sta 42+45 '5 0 8.0. 134.0 140.0 95 96 Complies 6' S Center line 201 Sta 42+50 10''S Center 'line 5.1 -8.0 125.1 140.0 95 89 Does not complies 202 Sta 42+60 4' S Center line 4.3 8.0 131.2 140.0 95 93 Does not complies 203 W/Bnd lane sta 40+80 10'-N 5.1 8.5 133.3 140.0 95 95 Complies Center line 8-20 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . . . . . . 204 W/B lane Sta 52+55 4.3 8 0 132 1 140 0 95 94 Does not complies ,' N Center line 205 W/Bnd lane Sta 51+00 on 5.9 8.0 136.0 140.0 95 97 Complies Center line . . W/Bnd lane Sta 50+00 . . . . . 206 6' S Center line 6.2 8.0 133.6 140.0 95 95 Complies T- T xin 0 (. XT t A t M 'P 0 ID (\ 1 V /' P 41 1 1 Q Q TEST No. ' ' C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DR Y. DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R KS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 8-20 NUCLEAR DENSITY 207 W/Bnd lane Sta 8' N Center line .6 .3 8.0 131.8 140.0 95 94 Does not complies 208 W/Bnd lane Sta 8' N Center line 6.0 8 0 132.9 140 0 95 95 Complies-retest of20 209 W/Bnd lane Sta 47+W4' S 5.5 8.0 Center 1 -me 131 A 140.0 95 94 Does not complies 210 W/Bn,d lane Sta 46+00 6.1 8.0 134.4 140.0 95 96 Complies 5' N Center line 2 W/Bnd lane Sta. 45+00 4.5. 8.0 125.3 140.0 95 89 Does not complies 12 1/2' S Center line - 0 . . 212 W/Bnd lane Sta 44+00 Center line 5.7. 8.0 134.4 140.0 95 96 Complies 213 lane Sta 43+00 1W/Bnd 5 5 8.0 131 0 140.0 95 94 Does not complies 13' N Center line 214 W/Bnd lane Sta 42+00 8 3 8.0 133.5. 140 0 95 95 Complies ' N Center line 215 W/Bnd lane Sta 41+5 5.2 8.0 134 7 140.0 95 96 Complies 3' S Center line 2 16 W/Bnd lane Sta 40+95 3.8 8.5 126 9 140 0 95 91 Does not complies 12' S Center line 217 W/Bnd lane Sta 40+75 5.1 8 5 Cent- er line 129 01 95 92 Does not complies 21 8 W/BNd lane Sta 40 + 4.-7 8.5- 131 ,5 140A 95 94 Does not complies 11 1/2' N Center line 219 Same location as above depth of 5.8 8.5 132.8 140.0 95 95 Complies transmission only difference 20 W/Bnd lane Sta 40+55 5:5 8.5 : 131.0 1.40.0 95 94 Does not complies. _____ Center line rnTT.F.a1 RT,\Jfl TMP.ROVEMENT PROJECT 113188 Page 4 No TEST • - LO C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DAY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE - COMP, R E M A R K S 8-20 NUCLEAR DENSITY 221 10' S Center line 4.8 8 5 W/Bnd lane Sta 40+54 133.4 140.0 95 96 Complies 8-21 SAND CONE: - 222 Elect Trench Sta. 91+93 & Trench 15.2 '17.51 - 100-.8. 111.5 90 90 Complies 223 93 70 Station - 22.1 17.5 10-1.1 111..5 90 91 Complies mw 1) City of Carlsbad fTi7Lowry -. • • TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO - REVIEWED BY .• - Kirk P. Ammerman, (C.E.)- • • North County Branch Manager RECEIV E D OCT 2 8 1987 NBS/LOW R Y - S.D. fl J/ Testing En gin Diego .. A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 0 LI\J/J 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San-Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757 -0248 DAILY RESULTS--IN PLACE DENSITY-TESTS DATE OF TEST 08/24/87 . . . LOCATION. City. of Carlsbad FILE -NO. . PROJECT College Blvd Improvements LAB. No. 087-452 DATE OF REPoRT_J0..L..2.6j.8.J..... --------- ._ .......CONTRACTOR_ TEST No. . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN. PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST.. IN PLACE DRY MAX DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R EM -A R K S MOIST. . DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. -24 NUCLEAR DENSITY 224 49+00'12' N-Center line 6.3 8.0 138.9 1-40,0 95 99 COMPLIES 1/Bnd lane 8-20 6+65 13 1/2' . . . . . . . . 225 Center line . 4.2 8.0 124.2- 140.0 95 89 Does not complies 226 44+90 Ref. from stake E/Bnd side . . 5.0 8.0 .. 126.5 140.0 95 86. Does not comply 13 S Center l ine *. Sta 42+89 . . . . . 227 ' 5 Center line 4.7 8.0 129.8 . 140.0 -95 . 93 .- Does not comply 228 Same hole as. above 42+89. . . . ____ W/Silica sand 4.9 8 0 130 5 1400 95 93 Does not comply 40+75 1' S Center. line . 229 2nd shot see below, 4 5 8.0 133 3 1400 95 _- 95* Complies 230 Sta 40+75 W/Bnd lane 5 0 8.0 . 128 0 140 0 - - 95 . . 91* Does not comply 1 Center line . -- * 1st shot shted gauge came up wltnif . . . . . ** 2nd Test for Bob W/So. Coa 231 After 1pass or roller Sta. .44+90 5.3 8.0 122.5 140.0 - 95 . 88 - Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. - THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL rnLT.FaF. RT,VT) TMPPflVF.MFNTS TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT PERCENT NO L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 8-24 NUCLEAR DENSITY: ontinues from test #231 pg. #1 Moved gauge 3".frorn original test spot - used silica sand 232. P r tSta 44+90 ? N of Test 4.9 8.0 126.3 140.0 95 90 Does not comply 2.33 Elect. Trench Sta 77+80 . ,enter 1in 19.0 20.5 98 4 .107.5 90 92 Complies 234 Sta. 77+82 1 1. N Center line 19.5 20.5 99.5 107.5 90 93 Complies 235 Sta. 86+90 Elect. Trench . . _____ 15.2 14.0 Center line 104.8 116.0 90 90 Complies 236 Elect. Trench 91+40 Center line 18.7 17.5 102.9 111.5 90 92 Complies 237 Sta 90+90 Center line 11.6 17.5 101.7 111.5 90 91 Complies 238 Elect, trench 95+70 . 19.6 17.5 103.6 111.5 90 93 Complies Telephone Trench Sta. 73+40 23.9 1 SCenter line Trench 15.7 17.5 100.8 111.5 90 90 Complies 240 • Sta 76+28 . 20.1 1 N Center Trench 17.5 101.8 111.5 90 91 Complies 241 Sta. 81+37 Center line • 21.1 17.5 102.2 111.5 90 92 Complies P/UP Sample check Pt. of M/D 8-25 Street light crossing Sts. 69+71 • 17.1 13.0. 108.5 119.0 90 91 Complies 71t7 6 TJ/fl2ntr line 1'/Bnd Side 243 Street light crossing Sta. 78+00 • 21.3 14.0 104.5 116.0 90 90 Complies _____ 1 E trench Center line r,f')T T.Fr_17. RT.\lfl TMPROVF.MNTS PAGE 3 TEST No. ' r c T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM. MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 8-25 NUCLEAR DENSITY:. ST. lgt. Crossing E/Bn.d Ctr. line 244 Side Trench Sta 82+00 6 1/2' N of fire hydrant . at sta 82+20 18.3 13.0 107.4 119.0 90 92 Complies 245 Strt. lgt. Crossing Sta. 83+25 18.7 14.0 106.0 116.0 90 92 Complies 46 Street light Crossing 9 Sta.92+OO17.1 17.5 1 111 90 90 Conplies 21' E/Bnd side:Probe W/Bnd side tight EO. E. Center line Trench _ 8-26 SAND CONE: . S __ ]..5 . 2 w/;Bnd lane 1 112' B.TC. 5.0 8.0 136.3 140.0 95 97 Complies 37+50 Center line Rdwy S S W/Bnd 1 1/2' B.T.C. S 248 13' S Center line 4.8 8.0 135.0 140.0 95 96 Complies W/:Bnd lane 1 1 /2' B.T.C. St.28+55 S . 249 12, 1/2' 5 Center line . 5.4 8.0 133.3 140.0 95 95 Complies 8-28 - SthTD CONE 250 250 land (Act S/Bnd) Sta 3+70 4.8 8.0 144 4 140.0 95 100+ 1 1/2' B.T.C. 5' N Center line 8-27 S SAND CONE: 251 W/Bnd lane 1 1 /2' B.T.C. 7.1 .8 .0 134.9 140.0 595 96. Complies 2 52 W/Bnd lane Sta 15+25 Center line 4.0 8.0 135.8 140.0 95 97 Complies 1 1/2' B.T.C. 253 1 1/2' B.T.C. 2' W Center line 6.8 8.0 133.2 140.0 95 95 Complies Sta. 4+60 . S TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY mw 1) City __ of Carlsbad :N_ X,A ~; -F> Att~~~~ Z:I Kirk P. Ammerman, (C.E.) North County Branch Manager an Diego rj Testing Engineers —S I,. A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. - - , 3467 Kurtz St., P.O.Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 . .. DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST fl-7R-R7 . . . . - . LOCATION City of Carlsbad FILE No.5259 PROJECT College Blvd Improv'ementc - L_B. No._087 -472 . DATE OF REPORT ____CONTRACTOR . . . TEST NO . L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE . OPTIMUM . MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY. . REQUIRED COMP._— 8-28SAND C0NE1 q/Bnd lane (Act S/Bnd) Sta 3+70 25 B.T.C. 5'.N Center.'ie . 4.8. . :8.0.. .. 144.4 -. 140.0 95 . 100+. Complies . . 9-1 tNUC1JEARDENSITY N,Bnd lane 25' from outside end 4.2 8.0 132.5 140.. 95 95 Complies 255 nfTslRndW/side of Rd 9' W1 Center line . NBnd lane 25' from outside end . . .. 256 .. . , 4.2 of island W/side of Rd 9 W 8.0 .. 132.3 140..0 95 :95 Complies Center line. . . . . - - .... .. . N Bnd lane E/side of Rd 24' from 257 5.8 end of Island 121 = Center line 8.0 137 6 140.0 95 98 Complies N B,nd. lane E/side of Rd." 24 from .4.6 8.0 140.1. -140.0 95 :--100. j-Complies 258 'and of Island 12' = Center, 1ine..1 . . 140.0 259 N Bnd lane Sta 4±53 - 4.5 8.0 . . . 131.5 . 95 94 I; . . Does not, comply _____ 2 1/2 W Center line . . THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS- SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. 1EVIEWED 14Y ('.flT.T.F.(F. BT.Vfl TMPROVEMENTS 1fl_)R_7 TEST ' IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 CA T I 0 N' ' PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE REMARK $ MOIST. , DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-1 LUCLEAR DENg N Bnd lane Sta. 4+53 260 2 1/2' W Center line ' 5.0 8.0 132.6 140.0 95 95 Complies N Bnd lane Sta 4+53 261 E/side of Rd-10.''E Center line 5 9 8.0 1 137.3 140.0 95 98 Complies 262 N Bnd lane Sta. '4+66 5.6 8.0 136.3. 140.0 95 97' Complies . Centerline 263 NBnd lane at •Man Hole 2 5.8 8.0 ' 124.4 140.0. 95 89 Does not comply 1 N of Man Hole ', N Bnd lane W/edge 2 1/2' W% 264 Center line 28 1/2 from nose 6.3 8.0 . . 127.6 140.0 95 ' 91 Does not comply tace ott curb 265 N Bnd lane E/edge 12 1/2' E 5.1 8.0 127 8 140.0 95 91 Does not comply 1'7" off curb . .5 5 -• . . , - S N. Bnd lane 13'. W Center line 266 2' E of curb Sta. 5+00 . 5 7.7 8.0 1.26.5 140.0 95 '90. Does not comply N Bnd lane 13'.W center line 2' 267 E of curb Stá.5+00 shift 'gauge . 6.9 .8.0 '. 132.4 140.0 95 , 95 Complies 61 slot 268 N Bnd lane Sta 5+04 no sand 1/2' 6.4 .8.0. 128 2 140.0 95 92 Does not comply W centerline slight rock. point .N Bnd lane Sta + 504 with sand... ' ,S 0 269 1/2". W centerline s'li'ghtrockpo.in: S .6.1 8.0. 127.5' 140.0 95 S . 91... ' S Doe's not .cornpl.y 270 N Bnd lane E/edge 13 1 /2' E 6 4 8 0 129 8 140 0 95 93 Does not comply _____ Center line Sta. 5+08 5 5 . T7 r tLl TIT IM TMvpnTpM1NTR PAGE 3 10728-87 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMe. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY ' REQUIRED COMP. 9-1 N Bnd lane Sta 6+95 E/edge Rd 271 14' E Center line 6.2 8.0 130.4 140.0 95. 93 Does not 'complies 272 N Bnd lane E/edgeRd 13 1/2' E 6.3 8.0 132.7 140 ..0 95 95 Complies Center line 1 1/2 off street or . curb Sta. 7+05 S . 273 N Bnd lane Man 'Hole 1/3 1' So. Mp Nle Cntr line Pd 3.9 ' 8.0, 123.3 140.0 95 ' 88 Does not comply 274 of NBnd lane 9+40 5.7 8.0. ' '131.2 140.0. 95 94 Does not compl 2 "W Center line . N Bnd lane Man Hole //4 3' So. ' ' 275 Center line ' ' 1 .3.6 8.0 119.3 140.0 95 ' 85 Does not comply N 'Bnd lane 13" line ,WCenter S . 276 Sta 12+40 W/Edge , 7.9 " 8.0' ' 131.5 140.0 95 94 Does not comply. N bound lane 9' east 277 Center line 7 8 8 0 13.1 .4 140 0 95 94 Does not comply 278 N Bnd lane W/side 17+84 5.4 8.0 134 9 140.0 95 96 Complies 10 -W Center line 279 NBnd lane Sta.. 20+50 ' ' 8.4 8.0 ' 127.7 140.0 95 .91 'Does not comply Center line Bnd lane Stä. .20+50 2 1/2' ,N' 280 Center line ' , S , 6.3 8.0 128.0 140.0 95 91 , Does not comply, 281 3' E Ce'nter'line . . 5.6 N Bnd lane Sta'. 23+0 8.0 138.3 140.0 . 95 99 Complies ' 282 N Bnd Lane Sta 26+00 6.1 8.0 125.1 140.0 95 89 Does not comply Center line 283 N Bnd lane Sta 07+35 5' 3..8 8.0 126.7 , 140.0 95 91 Doe's not comply COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PAGE .4 1.0-28-87 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX DRY PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-1 (NUCLEAR 1 Bnd lane valve cluster at Sta 284 27+68 E/side of cluster 6 3 8.0 131 3 1 40 0 95 94 Does not comply 285 . 1 Bnd lane Valve cluster St sta. . 5.2 8.0 123.2. 140.0 95 88 Does not comply 27+68.N/side of cluster . .. . . . . T Bnd lane Island So. Nose 5' So. . . . . . 286 1ose Sta. 28+45 . 3.7 .8.0 125.4 140.0 95 87 Does not comp y- 287 N Bnd lane Sta.' 32+00 6.3 8 -.0 ., . 127.4 10.0 . . 95 91 Does not comply 5 S Center line . . . . . 288 T Bnd lane Sta 36+15 l 5.6 8.0 127 7 140.0 95 91 Does not comply Center line . . . .. . . -. S . . .. . N Bnd lane Approximately 289 38+10 5' So Center line 6.0 8 0 131 4 140 0 95 94 Does not comply 290 N Bnd lane Sta. 39+60 2' So Center line 5.7 8.0 128.2* .140.0 95 92 Does not comply 9-9 J NUCLEAR DENSITY: 291 1 1/2'.-.E Centerline trench EDL 10 9 9.'5 102.8. .128.0, 90 80 Does not comply tie-in Sta 1+46 . S . . . . 292' 1 '1/2'. E Center.lin trenc h EDL 105 9.5 105.7 128.0 0 83 Does not comply tie-in Sta 1+46 . : . .. S. . 293 Sta 1+47 Center line 7 6 9 5 105.2- 128 0 90 82 Does not comply 9-17 (NULCEARDENT? 294 Sidewalk N Side of College Blvd 8.2 14 0 107 5 116 5 90 92 Complies 3+45 Sidewalk,N sideof College '1vd S S 295 5 . 103 14.0 106.3 116.5. 90 91 Cdmplies rcTT'1 TUfl TMDDrnTMMPQ • 1 f\ .O O7 TEST No. - L 0 C.A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 ITY Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 296'5+45 6.3 14.0 107.8 116.5 90 93 Complies 297 Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 6.6 14.0 110.0 116.5 90 94 Complies 6+45 • ______ _________• .Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 298 ' 7.4 14.0 110.2 • 116.5 90 95 Complies ,'Sidewalk N side of College Blvd 8.5 14.0 110.9- 1165 90 .95 Complies 8+45 300 'Sidewalk N side -of College-Blvd • • 10+45 8.5- 14.0 110.8 116.5 9.0 95 Complies Sidewalk N side of College B lvd 12+45 -14.0 .. 107.6 116.5 90 92 Complies tSidewalk N Side of College Blvd 302 14+45 • 9.6 14.0 113.5 116.5 90 97 Complies 303 "Sidewalk N Sidewalk College Blvd 10..5 .14 .0 102.3 116.5 90 • 88 Does not comply 16+50 • . . - _______ • _______ _______ _____________________ 304 'Sidewalk 'N 'side of College Blvd 7.1 14.0 104.9. 116.5 90 - 90 Complies 18+50 - - ______ • ________ ________ ________ _________ _________________________ 305 rSidewalk N side of.College. Blvd 19..3 14.0 • 99.7 116.5 • 90 . 86 Does not comply 20+50 306 Sidewalk N Side of College Blvd 11 2 14.0 105 ..3 116.5 90 90 Complies - 22+50 - • 'Sidewalk N Side of College Blvd 0 307 - 24+50 - • 8.5 14.0 109.7 116.5 90 94 •,. Complies -• 308V Sidewalk 26+50 N Side of College - Blvd 4 ______ 14.0 _________ 102.8 116.5 90 ________ 88 0 Does not comply _________________________ 09 309V' .5Y •E of 5.' Center line of W lane 4.2 8.0 • .136.2 137.0 95 99 Complies 53+00 ) - - COLLEGE BLVD IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 6 10-28-87 TEST - IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE - MAX. DRY PERCENT PERCENT No. L 0 '-" T ,.s J ' PLACE ' MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A R K S . MOIST. DENSITY ' REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 NUCLEAR DENSITY--f 310 V 6' W of Center line of W lane 4 2 .8 .0 .136.2 137 0 95 99 Complies 50+00 . ' /7" E of Center. line of W lane ' 311 47+00 4 7 8 0 128 8 . 137 0 95 94 Complies 312 v8' W of Center line of W lane 3.2. 8.0 137.5 137.0 95 100+ Complies 44+00 313 9' E of CEnter line of W lane 3.4 8.0 136 4 137 0 95 100 Complies 41+00 8' W of Centerline of W lane.' 314 38+00 . " . - ' 4.0 , 8.0 ' 136.6 137.0 95 - 100 Complies I10' E of Center line of .W lane 315 35+00 .' ' ' 2.7 8.0 133.8 '137.0 95 98E Complies 316 7' W of Center line of -W lane 12+00 2 9 . 8.0 - 141.2 137.0 95 ' ' 100+ - Complies '5' E of Center line of W lane 317 29+00 3.7 8.0 129 5 137 0 95 95 Complies 318 4 W p Center line of W'lane',. 4-00 8 .8 .0 129 6 137 0 95 95 Complies 319 V' E of Center line of W lane 4-.2 8.0 132.8 ' 137.0 95 97 Complies 23+00 3 20 8' W of Center line of W lane 4 5 8.0 138 8 137 0 95 100+ Complies 20+00 321 - '11' E of Center line of W lane 17+00 5.2 .8 .0 132 2 137 0 95 97 Complies 322 ' W of Center line of W lane 5.3 8.0 136.3 137.0 95 100 Complies 14+00 s8' E of Center line of'W lane 323 11+00 4.0 8.o 133 1 137.0 95 97 Complies flflLT.F.1 RT.\lfl TMPR011PM1flTTq 1T LO CAT I ON' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN DRY PLACE MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL.COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K $ DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. MOIST. 9-17NU-CLEAR DENS. 32 9' W of Center line of w lane 6.1 8.0 137.3 ' 137.0' 95 100+ Complies 325 4' E of Center line of W lane 54-00 49 . 8.0 130.7 137.0 95 '95 Complies 326 le8' W of Center line of W lane . 52. . 8.0 135.1 137.0 95 99 Complies 1+46 13' E of Center line of 32 , ' i lane 7.3 8.0 13.5 137 .0 95 96 Complies 328 2' W of Centerline of E lane. ' 1+45 6.5 . 8.0 ' 133.7 - ' 137.0 95 98 Complies 329 94' wof Center line of E lane 1. + 20 6.4' ' 8.0 128.8 1370 95 ' 94 Does, not comply 330 V5' E of, Center line of E lane 1+20 7 ' 5 . 8.0 129.4 . 137.0 95 Compités 331 12151 W 9f W lane 28' N of Center 'line of Palomar Airport Rd. 8.4 8.0 132.3 137.0 ' 95 97' Com plies 332 v160' W of W'lane 29' N of Center line of Palomar Airport Rd'. 7.7 8.0 '128.0. 137.0 95 94 Does hot comply 333 '100' W of W line 25" S 'of Center imp of Palomar Airport Rd 7.8. ' 8.0 131.0 1,37.0' 95 ' 96 Complies - V50' VSO' W of W'lane 30' S of C enter line of Palomar Airport Rd. , '6.7 . 8.0 127..3 137.0 95 93 ' Does not comply 4-300' E o'f E lane 25' S of Center line of Palomar 'Airport Rd. 7 .9 ' ' 8.0 ' 128.5 137.0 95 94 , Does not comply 336 1 200 E of E lane 25' S of Center ' imn ~f P 1nm r Airp rr PcI . 6.9 ', 8.0 121.5, ' 137.0' 95 89' Does n'ot comply _____ vloo E of E lane 25' S of Center, line of Palomar Airport Rd. I 8.2 . 8.0 123.7 . 137.0 95 . 90 ' Dos not com ply C()T.T.1'(21 RT.\Tfl TMPPfl\TMPMrQ TEST No. L 0 C AT 10 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY. MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 9-17 TUCLEARE D EN ITY: . . . . '. . . 338 1"5' E of E larié.'.30", S of Center line of Palomar Airport Rd. '. . . 6.3 . . 8.0 . . .126.3 . . '. 137.0 . 95 92 Does not comply 339 RETEST 0F#42 8.2 . 8.0 131.1 137.0 95 '.96 RETEST. OF TEST //42 Complies 34,0 "RETEST OF 1/43 . 7.8 . . 8.0 130.3 137.0 95 . 95 RETEST OF TEST 341 VRETEST OF //44 . , 7.5 8.0 131.0 137.0 . .95 96 ' RETEST OF'TEST 1/44 342 /ETES..T OF 1/45 ., ' 7.8 8.0 '. 130.5 1370 95 95 , RETEST OF TEST 1/4 5 Complies 343 R ETEST OF #41 7 2 8 0 130 6 137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //41 Complies 344 V ETEST OF //39 7 5 8.0 130.21137 0 95 95 RETEST OF TEST //39 Complies. 345 LETES OF'//37 . . , " •. 7.2 ' ' 8.O. 132.0 137.0 95 .95 RETEST OF'TEST //37 Complies 346 RETEa.T OF #36 .' . 8'.l 8.0 132.1 -. 137.0 ' 95 . 95 RETEST 'PF TEST //36 Complies 9-18 t L 1 ta 53+00 9 5 F C S/Bound lane .146.2 152.0 95 96 Complies 2 5 t 52+30 8" S F.C. . . .. . .. . ''147.6 ' 152.0 ' 95 . 97 Com'1ies 3. 5 ta,. 51+80 3' So. F.C. ' . . ' 147.8 152.0 95 97' ' Complies 4 ta 48+70 '6' So. F -.C. 149.6 . 152.0 95 98 . Complies' C0TTPr1 RT.\1fl TMPPC'ITMTT TEST IN OPTIMUM IN. IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT J.. PERCENT i,U OI - No. ' r ' A TI 0 N' , ' PLACE MOIST. MOIST. DENSITY ' DENSITY REL. COMP. REQUIRED' RELATIVE COMP. ' R E M A R K S 9-i8 46 STa 24+45 6' W face curb 150.4 152 0 95 99 Complies 47 Sta. 28+45 4' W face curb 147 2 152 0 95 97 Complies 48 Sta.28+30 Center line lane So / Rr t1 - ' ' ' ' 144 4 152 0 95 96 Complies 49 Sta. 37+50 So /Bnd lane 2' E face curb 147 7 152-1 0 95 97 Complies 50 STa 37+55 12' E Face curb' 146 6 152 0 95 97 Complies 9-18 UCL EAR DENSITJ 347 N/Bnd lane Sta. 52+50 6' W Face curb 5.4 8.0 131.3 138.0 95 95 Complies 348 N/Bnd lane Sta 48+70 6' E 4 7 8 0 131 0 138 0 95 95 Complies N/Bnd 'lane Sta. 44+15349 ' ' ' 2' E Center line 5 1 8 0 137 1 138.0 95 99 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta.. 40+70 350 Center line 5.3 ' 8.0 137.6 138.0 95 100 Complies 351 ' 2' 'E of Face curb N/Bnd lane Sta 35+50 5.8 ' 8 0 128.8 '138..0 95 93 Does not comply N/Bnd laneSta. 35+50 - - 352 Ii' E. Face Curb ' 5.0 8.0 " 134.0 138.0 95 - Complies - Sta. 31+70 N/nd lane' - - , . 6.4 - 4" W Face curb - 8.:0 .134.0 - 138.0 95 - 97 Complies 354 S t a 27+60 8' E Center line lane - , .. ' ' 5.0 8 0 136 7 138 ' 0 95 99 Complies El f' n T 1 t f' V DI TT 1 r .i D T) f% IT V IN V M 'P C' TEST No. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K $ MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-18 rNUCLEAR DENSI .. . . Sta. 27+80 15' W center line S 355 lane 4.8. 8.0 .128.3 . 138.0 95 93 . Does not comply 356 Sta. 28+65 Center line .lane'. 5.3 8.0 135.7 138.0. 95 98. Complies 357 Sta. 22+50 2'. W Face curb . 4.5 8.0 131.8 . 138.0 95 96 Complies 358 STa. 18+30 31/2',E Face curb 4.9 8.0 138.0 138.0 95 100 Complies ,.I \ ___ N/Bnd lane STa. 14+00 359 3 1/2 E Face -curb \ - 7.1 - . 8.0 131.3 - -. 138.0 95 95 Complies 360 N/Bnd lane Sta 9+20 center line 6.4 8.0 132.7 138.0. 95 96 Complies 361 NtBnd- lane Sta.. 4+70 1 E face 6.7 CULIJ. -8.0 130.4 138.0 95 95 Complies S 362 Run B/S 3' E of 1' E Face curb 5.1.4 8.0 137 3 138.0 95 100 Complies For back-up info. • • - . . - . 9-19 NULER'D E NS1ZT Y-ON-ASPHAL N/Bnd 3') E face curb - 51 5a ne . 144..8 152.8 95 95 Complies Sta. 52 .N/Bnd lane 2' W face curb 52+50 Complies.STa. 150.4 4528 95 98 - 53 N/Bnd lane Sta. 50+70 . 4' F. riirh • - - S . t46.5 - 152.8 95 . 96 Complies N/Bnd lane Sta. 5O+4 5 54 4 W face curb 148.4 - 152.8 95 - 97 Complies - 11 C(T.T.1C RT.\TTh TMPP0\1PMNT OAt't''')t\ 1 C', TEST No. L 0 C A T I ON: PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. N PLACE DRY TMAX. DRYPERCENT DENSITY REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-19 S/Bnd lane Sta. 3+00 139 14' W face of curb . ' .149.6 152.0 95 98 'Complies 140 Check out left turnpocke w/Kirt G area not compacted ranged 136.9 152.0 95 90 Does not comply from 85-93 141 Sta. 33+00 4' W face of curb 140.7 - 152 ..0 95 92 Does not comply. 142 S t a 30+45 8'-w left turnpocket 136 9 152.0 95 90 Does not comply 143 Sta. 30+45 8' W left turn pocket , . 16.4 152.0 95 ' 90 Does not comply 144 Sta. 30+50 2' W face of curb . . 129.3' . 152.0 95 85 Does not. comply J.e.ft turh pocket Sta. .30+50 7' W face of cur.b ' ' 145 left. turnpocket . . ' . ' . 1359 152.0 , 95 89 Does' not comply. STa 32+50 6' W face of curb 146 le t turn 139.5-- 152 0 95 92 Does not comply STa. 33+94 5' W face f curb' 147 : ' left turnpocket ' 141.0 . 152.0 95 . 93 Does not comply 9-24( DENSITY'.: L. Sidewalk W side Center line 363 ' 41+75 11.9 14.0 111.0 116.5 90 95 Complies Sidewalk W side Center line 364 ' Sta. 45+50 11 7 14.0 110-4 116.5 90 95 Complies 365 Sidewalk W side Center line STa 49+00 12.6 14.0 1 108.0 116.5 90 93 Complies C0T.1?(1? T\11'I TMPPA1IPMP1'JTQ TEST No. L 0 C A TI 0 N ' IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT. REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE- R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9-24 1JJ_CLAR DENSITY: ealk W side Center line 366 id,. Sta 51+75 : ": 9.5 .14.0 112.0 . 116.5 90 96 Complies 9/25 T3 All tests are retests of tests taken 9-21-87 Re-A College Blvd. left turn lane CL of Lare 230'N of CL ' 146.3 - 152..5 95 96 Complies RETEST A Re-B College Blvd. Left turn CL 120'.N of CL, P.A.R. 46.8 152.5 ' 95 96 ' Complies RETEST B Palomar airport rd. left Re-C turn lane 100'W of CL 137.5 152.5 95 90 Does not compl' ,' . retest C Palomar airport rd. left Re-D turn 100' W of CL college blvd.. '144.3 152.5 95 . C omplies RETEST D . 95 Palomar airpor,t rd. right, . Re-E tur'n' n lane 230' E of CL ' 143.1 152 5 95 94 Does not comply . retest E Palomar airport rd. rt. lane Re-F 120' E of CL college. blvd. - ' 148.4 . , 152.5 95 .- 97 Complies RETEST F 38' S of CL Palomar. airportRe-G . . 140.6 152.5 95 92 Does not comply Rd. CL Of college blvd." - , RETEST 9/25çU - D ENSITIES -FINISH SUB. GRADE _ 0 Sidewa lk E side College Blvd. 367 Centerline Sta. 42+00 9.3 14.0 - 100.1 116:5 90 86 Does not comply -. Sidewalk E side College Blvd.- 368 Centerline 39+50 10 1 14.0 . 1 . 00.1 116.5 90 86 - Does not comply 369 Sidewalk E. side College Blvd. 9.2 14.0 100.1 116.5 90 86 ' Does: not comply -COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 22 116-87 EST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACEMAX.. Dnv PERCENT PERCENT 10. N - PLACE MOIST. DRY -DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R E M A - MOIST: DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 9 / 21 Sidewalk E side College blvd.7 370 2 14 0 centerline 31+00 1.03 .4 116 5 90 89 Does not comply 37.1 Sidewalk E side College Blvd 9 8 14.o 1.03 .0 116.5' 90 88 Does not comply Centerline 26+00 - 372 Sidewalk E side College Blvd 10.8 14 .0, 97.3 116.5 90 84 Does not comply Centerline 22+00 . 9/3 37+00 .Median 9 0 11.0 107.7' 116.5 90 92 Complies 373 374 32+00 Median 8.7 11.0 107 4 116.5 90 92 Complies 375 34+00 Media 9 2 11.0 108.8 116 5 90 93 Complies -- Median Sta. 23+50 - - 15.9 14.0 105.4 116.5 0 9.0 Complies - 376 377 Median Sta 19+10 13.8 14.0 105:5 116.5 90 91 Complies 378 Median Sta 14+10 10.8 '14.0 107.6 116.5 90 92 Complies 379 Median Sta 9+50 14.0 14 0 110.1 116.5 90 94 Complies 380, College blvd 8' N of center line 20 1 14.0 106.8 117 5 90 91 Complies 55+00 N lane 6' N of center line College blvd 10' 5 of centerline 19.2 14.0 108..l 117.5 90 92 Complies 381 58+00 N lane 12' S of centerline 38 College blvd 4' N of centerline 7 6 14 0 117 8 117 5 90 100 Complies 61+00 N lane class II base 383 College blvd. 10 Nof centerline ;9 201. 14.0 64+00 N lane area pumping slighti '104.3 117.5 - 90 - 89 Does not comply 384 College blvd area around MH need 19.-0 14.0 107.4 117 5 90 91 Complies compactio.n66+00 N lane 11 'Sof MH 4. - COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 23 11--97 rEsT O• . LO CA TI 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S . . MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 0/21. College blvd. area around 9 16.3 14.0 107.2 117.5 90 91 Complies 385 'needs compaction 69+00 MR b W o MR 8' N of centerline N lane 386 S lane 125' W of faraday Interse 19.1 14.0 . 106.1 117.5 90 90 . Complies College blvd. S lane MH in center 387 of Rd.wy66+00Slane 14'N of C.L. 15.5 14.0 110.0 110.6 90 94 Complies 388 College blvd. MH 63+00 S lane 10' 16.3 14.0 110.6 117.5 90 94 . Complies S of Center line 38 College blvd. MH 60+00 S lane 17.9 14.0 106.4 117.5 90 ' 91 Complies S 10''W_of_centerline 390 College blvd. MR 56+00 S lane 21.8 14.0 104.7 .117.5 90 ' 89 Does not comply area-around MR need compaction ' 391 College blvd, 50' E of'Intersecti '16.7 14.0 106.9. 117.5 90 91 ' Complies S lane 10' S of centerline 380A.lRetest 380 Sta. 55+00 . 16.6 14.0 107.9 117.5 90 3 Complies R etest 380 Retest II Retest 383 Sta. 64+00 . 20.3 .. 14.0 106.. 1 117.5 90, 90 Complies 383 383A 384A Retest 384 Sta. 384 18. 14.0 108.2 ' 117.5 90 92 Complies ' Rest II 384 38'S' Retest Sta , .. 17.7' 14.0 69+00 ' . 109.6 ' 117.5 90 93 Retest 1/ Complies ' 385 .386A Retest 386 125' S of Faraday 20.7 14.0 107.0 117.5 90 91 Compli,es, Retest--# 386 . 389A Retest 389 60+00 17.8 14.0 107.2 ' 117.5 90 ' 91 ' , Retest/ Complies 389 Retest 390 Sta. 56+00 17.7 14.0 109.6 117.5 90 93 Complies Retest 1/ 390A , 390 Retest 1/ 391A 'Retest 391 50' N of, intersect. 15.2 14.0 ' 109.1 117.5 '90 93 complies 9 Sta. 53+75 • • • _________ _________ , '• _________ , College Blvd. Improvements TEST 0. L 0 C A T I 0 N . IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY 'MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A K S ' MOIST. . DENSITY ' REQUIRED COMP. 10/22 College Blvd. 69+20 20.' N of Fl 392 E lane 10'W centerline 1.55 14.0 113.0 117.5 90 93 Complies CB 72-00 E lane 6' E centerlin 393 17.9 14 0 109 ..1 117 5 90 93 Complies CB 75+00 E lane 8' W centerline l..9.5 19.-5 107 9 117.5 1 90 92 Complies 395 18 CB 78+00 E lane 7.''E centerline- 8 18 8 104.8 117.5 90 89 Complies 396 College Blvd 82+50 E lane 13 8 14.0. 109 4 1 17 5 90 93 Complies 397 College Blvd 84+50 E lane 21 ..3 14-0 101 9 117 5 90 87 Does not comply 398: College Blvd. 84+00 W. lane 14.0 90' 21.2 104.5 117.5 89 Does not comply 399 College Blvd. 81+00 W. lane 18.7 14.0 106.7 117.5 90 ' 91' Complies 400 College Blvd 77+00 W lane 11 3.4 14.0' 110.2 117.5 90 94 Complies 401 College Blvd. 73+50 W. lane 20.2 14.0' 115.1 117.5 90 ' 98 Complies 402 College Blvd:. '.70+50 West lane ' 15.0 14.0 109.9 ' 117.5 90 94 'Complies 403 College Blvd SBRM Sewer W of 9.4 11.5 108.6 119.2 90 91 Complies Palomar airport rd. 50'Wof E rd. 404 CB S BRM Sewer W of palomar airport rd. 35" W of E rd. 12'W of MH TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIE(X) Reviewed by: Kirk P. /nniennan North County Branch Manager (iJ Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. I 3467 Kurtz St,PO Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 (iJ 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757 -0248 DAILY RESULTS-IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS. DATE OF TEST 10/23/87 . LOCATION Carlsbad, CA FILE No. _087-527 , PROJECT_College blvd. Improvements' LAB. No._52 59 DATE OF REPORT..November 18,!9S7CONTRACTOR TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY PERCENT PERCENT No L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE R K M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 10/23 NUCLEAR DENSITY 396A Retest of #396' Stat. 78+00 E. 18.5 14.0 19.5.7 117.5 - 90 ' 90. . Retest 11396 Complies Lane 7'E Centerline F'.G. Subbase 398A Retest of II 398 84+50 E. Lane '. 17.3 . 14.0 105.7 117.5 90 . 90 . . Retest' #398 Complies F.G. Subbase . . Retest #399 84+00 W Lane Retest #399 399A Finish Grade Subbase 17 8 14.0 105 9 117.5 90 90 Complies 10/24 NUCLEAR DENSITY College Blvd. E Bound Stat. 65+51 '. . . 405 II . e'12 Finish Sub Base 4.8 7.0 131.4 , 139.0 95 . 95 Complies stat. 63+00e 1211 Finish SubBase . 406 . . . 5.1 7.0 . 131.7 139.0 ''95 95 Complies 407 'Stat. e 59+50e 12" Finish Sub 5 7 0 " 132 0 139.0 95 95 Complies base . . 408 Stat. 54+50 83e 1211 Finish Sub 5.4 . '7.0 131.6 139.0 95 . 95 Cothpli'es Base 409 Stat 56+00 e-12" Finish Sub Base 5-TI 7-0 137 9 139.0 95 95 Complies THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND 'CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM 'TESTS MADE BY TESTING 'ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 2 TEST 0. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. lu PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT, REL. Comp: REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE .. COMP. REMARKS 10/2 NUCLEAR DENSITY: College Blvd. W. bound Stat. 59+ 410 00 e-12 t Finish Sub Base 70 131.3 139.0 95 . 95 Complies 411 Stat. 64+00e-12" Finish Sub 5.1 Base 7.0 131.4 139.0 95 95 Complies . 412 Stat 67+98 e-12" Finish Sub 5-.3 7.0 .131.6 139.0 95 95 Complies 413 S.G. on College Blvd. E. Bound Stat. 86+00 eF.S.G. 17.6 0 14.0 113.7 117.0 90 97 Complies 414 Stat. 91+00 e Finish Subbase 15.8 14.0 112.7 117.0 90 96 Cönplies 415 Stat. e 95+50 e Finish Subbase 150 14.0 108.3 117.0 90 93 Complies 416 Stat 98+50 e Finish Subbase 1.5 .5 14.0 107.1 117.0 90 92 Complies 417 Stat 98+00 e Finish Sub base 15.0 14.0 108 3 11'7.0 90 93 Complies 418 Stat 94+00 e Finish Sub base..16.4 14.0 107.5 117.0 90 92 Complies 419 Stat. 88+10 e Finish Sub base. 16.8 14.0 112.4 117.0 90 96 Complies 0 420 Stat 84+50e Finish Sub base 16.6 14.0 109.0 117.'0 90 93 Complies O/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY: 421 College Blvd East Lane Stat 54+50 . 6 1 7 0 0 129 A _________ 139 0 _________ 95 93 Does not comply 422 College Blvd W Lane Stat 57+70 7 0 7 0 126.3' .139.0 95 91 Does not comply COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS, 1 1/18 Page 3 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Day DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE. COMP. R E M A R K S O/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY 423 College Blvd W lane Stat 57+50 5.4 ,7.0 128 5 139 0 95 92 floes not comply 424 College Blvd W lane Stat 57+50 .6 .2 7 0 - .126.4 139.0 95 91 toes not comply 425 College Blvd W lane S t a t 63+50 3 7 0 132 7 139.'0 95 96 ComDlies 426 College Blvd W lane 66+50 5'.0 7 0 128 5 139.0 . 95 92 floeq not comply 427 College Blvd W lane 69+00 5.-4 7.0- 127.0 139.0 95 91 Does not comply 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY 428 College Blvd. E. Lane 70+50 .7.2 7.0 1301 139.0 95 .94 Does not comply 429 College Blvd. E. Lane 73+50 6.3 7.0. 1 30 139.0 95 94Does not comply 430 College Blvd. E. Lane 7650 5.9 .7 .0 130.3 139.,0 95 94 Does not comply 431 College Blvd .-E.. lane 79+50 7.9 7.0 130.3 139.0 95 89 Does not comply 432 College Blvd ..E. lane 82+50 5 9 7 0 127.4 139.0.'95 92 Does not comply 433 C51lege Blvd E lane 84+00 5.9 7.0 131.5 139 ..0 95 95 Complies 434 College Blvd W Lane 84+60 .5 .6 7 0 129 7 139.0 95 93 Does not comply 435 College Blvd. W. Lane 82+5 . 5.0 7.0 130.8 . 139.0 95 94 Does not comply COLLEGE BLVD. 'IMPROVEMENTS 1 1/18/87 Page 4 TEST NO • LO CA T1 ON' . IN. PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL.'COMP, PERCENT. RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . . . . . College Blvd.. W. Lane 79+50 .436 6.2 .7.0 :124.2 139.0 95 89 Does not com ply 437 College Blvd. .W. Lane 76+50, .5.0 7.0 .120.4 ' 139.0 95 87 Does not comply 438 College Blvd. W. line 73+50 5.4 7.0 124.7. 139.0 95 90 Does not comply 439 College Blvd. W. lane 70+56 5.0 7.0' 12.6 .'7. 139.0 95 91 Does not comply Median 57+00 Finish Subgrae 440 17.6 16.5 102.6 111.0 90 92 Compli's 441 Median 60+00 Finish Subgrade 16.8 16.5 98 .,7 111.0 90 89 . Does not comply 442 Median 63+00 Finish Subgrade 14.6 16:5 103.0 111.0 90 93 C,p1ies ,•.; 443 Median 66+75 Finish Subgrade 12.3 16.5 105.9 111.0 90 95 Complies 444 Median 73+00 Finish Subgrade 11.7 14.0 .103.1 116.5 90 89 Daas not comply 445 Median 76+00 Finish Subgra.de 10.8 140' . 109:5 116.5 . 9b 94 :Crnplies . . 446 Median 80+00 Finish Subgrade 1.9 .6 16 5 93 7 111 0 90 84 Does not comply 447 Median 82+90 Finish Subgrade 18.6 16.5 101.1 111.0 90 , 91 Complies . 448' Median 87+00 Finish Subgrade ' 11.9 16.5' 103.3 111.9 , 90 93 rn1es 449 Median 90+00 Finish Subgrade 15.8 16.5 105.4, 111.0 90 95 Complies COLLEGE BLVD.. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 •. Page 5 TEST No . . L 0 C A T 10 N . IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. Dny. DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. 10/26 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . . . . . . . . 450 Medain 92+00'Finish Subgrade 17 1 .6 .5 105.7 111 0 90 95 Complies 451 Median 95+00 Finish Subgrade 14 7 16.5 107 1 111;0 90 97 Complies 1.0/2.7 NUCLEAR DENSITY: . . . 21.A College blvd. E. lank 54+50 Retest 6f'421 7.9 7.0 132:5 139.0 95 95 Complies College blvd. E. lane 57+09 2 45 :. W o.f centerline 6 6 7.0 134.3 139.0 95 97 Comlies College blvd. E lane Stat. 60+00 8' E of centerline . 6.0 7.0 126.6 139.0 . 95 91 Does not cQmpl 4 54 College blvd. E. lane 63+00 ' 6.3 7.0 127.2 139.0. 95 92 W of centerline . 4- 55 College blvd E lane 66+00 10'E 6.1 7 0 130.9 139.0 95 94 Does not comply centerline College blvd: E. lane 66t00 20' 456 . W ofcenterline . . . 6.4 7.0 132 . 3 139.0 . 95 95 Complies 422A College blvd. Retest of U 422 6.9 7.0 129.6 139.0 95 93 Does not comply W lane 54+50 423A College blvd. Retest of 1/ 423 6.0 7.0 129.8 139.0 95 93 Does not comply W. lane 57+50 424A College Retest of #424 . 5 blvd. 5.7 7.0 131.3 139:0 95 94 . Ds:nQt,comply 426A College blvd Retest of /1426 5.0 7 0 132 1 139.0 95 95 Complies . . 66+50 . 427A College blvd. Retest of /1427 7.6 7.0 . 131.0 139.0 95 94 Does not comply . 69+00 COLLEGE BLVD. 'IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Page 6 TEST IN OPTIMUM, IN PLACE MAX. DnY PERCENT PERCENT No LO C A T I 0 N ' PLACE MOIST. DRY DENSITY REL. COMP. RELATIVE REMARKS MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 10/2 NUCLEAR DENSITY 453A College blvd Retest of 453 5.5 7-.0 134.1 139.0 95 97 Complies Retest of Stat. 60+00 453 454A College blvd Retest of 11454 5_3 7.0 134 5 139.0 95 97 Complies Retest of Stat. 63+00 E lane . 454 55A College blvd. Retest of 455 6.9 7.0 132.7. 139.0 95 96 Complies Retest of 66+00 E. lane 11455 422B College blvd. Retest 422A W.. . . Retest of 54+50 W lane .. . 6.4 7.0. 133.4 139.0 95 96 Complies 1/ 422A '23B College blvd. Retest 423A ' . S . Retest o Stat. 57+50 W lane 6.5. 7.0 133.4 139.0 95 96 Com,plies 1/ 423A 424B Cdllge Blvd, Retestof 424A 5 . 2 7 0 134.3 139.0 95 97 Complies Retest of Stat. 60+50 W lane . . . 11 424A '+27B College blvd. Retest of 11 427A 5.3 7.0 133.9 139.0 95 '. 96 Complies Retest of Stat. 69+00 W. lane '28A College blvd. Retest of #4128 5.3 . 7.0 131.8 139.0 95 95 Complies 'Retest of Stat. 70+50 E. lane , 1/ 428 29A College blvd. Retest of 11429 5.4 7.0 128.9 139.0 95 5 93 . Does not comply _' Stat..70+50 . Retest ofi/429 30A College blvd.. Retest of // .430 54 7.0 : 126.5 139.0 95 91 'Does not comply 7>6+50 E. lane . ,, . ' S S R test of 11430 31A College Blvd.' Retest of #432 .5.4 7.0 ,.1;27.6 139.0 92 Does not comply ' Stat. 79+50 E. lane S . S Retest of//431 32A College blvd. 'Retest of 11432 ' 5.5 7.0 131.3 139.0 95 94 Does not comply Stat. 82+50E'.lane S Retest of11432 33A' College blvd. Retest of 433 . 6.0 ' ' 7 0 ' 122.9 139.0 95 . ' 88 Does not comply '84+00 E. Lane Stat. . Retest of11433 COLLEGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 11/18/87 Pa ge 7 TEST No L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT RcL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT - RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S [0/30 NUCLEAR DENSITY 45.7 College blvd E lane S t a t'.60+ 7 3 138.3 140 6 95 98 Complies 45,8 College blvd E lane 63+00 .5-.5 7.3 138 1 140 6 95 98 Complies 459 Collgeb1vd.- E. lane Stat. 66+00 . 5.1 .73 136.6. 1406 95 97 Complies 460 College Blvd. E. lane Stat. 68+70 6 7.3 - 136;1- 140.6 95 97 Complies - - TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY -. - - - - - Kirk.P. Aüimëman- North County -Branch Manager ( J Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 I -=" 2956 Industry Street. ()c n.cid. (IifnrniR 9254 (1319) 7F7-n24J DAILY 'RESULTS IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE orTEST 10/29/87 NUCLEAR DENSITY: LOCATION Carlsbad, CA 0877529 PROJECT College Blvd. Improvements FILE NO )•Q November 19, 1987 LA U. No____________________ DATE OP REPORT_____________________-CONTRACTOR TcsT L 0 C A . OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY PER C PLACE MAX. DRY DENSITY R :EONJP. RELATIVEENT I R E 1.4 A R K S .. 461 MOIST. College Blvd. W. lane Stat. 85+ 11.5 7. 139.1 140.6. 95 :complies 20 15' E of centetline 462 College Blvd W lane Stat 89+50 9 . 7 3 138 6 140.6 95 99 Complies ' W of centerline - 463 College Blvd. W. lane Stat. 93+50 8.4 .7.3 139.5 140.6 .95 99 Complies 8' E of centerline • 464 College blvd. W lane 97+00 9' •E 6.3 7.3 135.8. 140.6 . . 95 97 Complies . of centerline College blvd W lane 71+50 E lane -10.1 7 3 135 1 140.6 95 96 Complies 465 466 College Blvd W lane 53+75 ' 10.5 7 3 140 0 146.6 95 100 Complies E of centerline 467 College blvd Stat 57+00 13 1 7 3 129 0 140 6 95 92 Does not comply College Blvd Retest of 11467 11 6 7 3 137 0 140 6 95 9 7 Retest of Complies 11 468 Stat. 57+00 467 469 College Blvd. W. lane.60+00 9' 10.0 73 139.5 140.6 .95. 99 Complies E of centerline 'T4776FWC0 11ege blvd W lane 63+00 8' 9.8 7.3 136.7 140.6 95 97 Complies of centerline THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFI(O PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. ()LT,F.(F BLVD. .IMPROVEMF.NT. 11/1O/7 rEST No; - . . ' ' . . IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY. DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 10/2 NUCLEAR DENSITY:' '471 College Blvd.. W. lane Stat. 66+00 10' E of centerline F.S.G.. 10.9 7.3 . 137.2 140.6 .. 95 . 98 Complies 472 College blvd. 50 C W. lane Stat. 69+ 10.8 7.3 1347 140.6 95: . 96 Complies College Blvd. E. lane Stat. 73+ .9 .6 25 F.S.G. . 7.3 .134.2 140.6 - 95 95 Complies 474 College blvd. E. lane Stat. 78+ 00 .. 9.5 7.3 . 132.2 140.6. 95 94 Does not comply College blvd E lane Stat..83+ 9 3 7 3 00 134 7 140 6 95 96 Complies 476 College blvd.- E. lane Stat. 9.5 55+00 7.3. 137.5 140.6 95 98 Complies 477 I College-Blvd. E. lane. Stat. . 9.1 7.3 59+00 137.7 140.6 95 98 - Complies - . TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY - 1) CIty. of Carlsbad BZLow Kirk P. Ammerman . North County Branch Manager ~127 Testing Engineers-San Diego t o A Do Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 KurtzSt., P.O. Box 80985, SanDiego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 J 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 TEST ' ' C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE R E M A R K S No. MOIST. DENSITY . REQUIRED COMP. - College Blvd E lane . S RETEST # 428A 428B RETEST 11 428A:. 7.4 7.3. 130.6 141.0 95 93 Does rnr r nmply College blvd E lane RETEST II 429A 429B RETEST #429A 7.3 7.3 128.7 141.0 95 92 Does not comply College blvd Elane RETEST // 430A 430B R;ETEST 1/430A 7.2 7.3 132.9 140.0 95 95 Complies College blvd E lane RETEST II 431A 431B RETEST #431A 8 1 T. 3 129.2 141.0 95 92 Does not comply College blvd E lane RETEST II 432A 432B RETEST #432A . 7.1 7.3 128.3 141.0 95 91 Does not comply Côllege blvd E lane . . . RETEST // 433A 4'33B RETEST.#433A 7.2 7.3 13.2.8 141.0 95. 94 Does not comply 478 College blvd 85+001 :E lane - 6.8 7.3 128.1 141.0 95 91 Does not comply 479 College blvd 88+00. E lane 7 0 7.3* 13L.5 141 A 95 94 Does not comply 480 College blvd 91+00 E lane 7.1 ' 7.3 130.1 141.0 95 93 " Does not -comply 481 College blvd 94+0 E lane 6.J. 7 3 130 4 141.0 95 93 Does not comply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - S TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. r'...l ,...._...'... D1.. 9 TEST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST: IN PLACE DRY MAX. Onv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE REMARKS No MOIST. M DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 482 College blvd 96+00 E lane 6.8 7.3 124 5 .14-1.0 95 89 Does not comply 483 College blvd 98+00' E lane . 7..6 7.3 132.1 141.0 95, 94 Does not comply RETEST #428B '. ' ' ' ' DETEST //428B 428C College blvd 70+50 E lane 7.9 7.3 , 131.6 .141.0 95 ' 94 boes not, comply College 'blvd 76+50 E'láne ' " - '.'•.. 0 ... . RETEST #429B 429C RETEST #429B . . 7.9 7.3 131.5 .14.1.0' 95 94 Does not comply 'College blvd. 76+50 E lane '' . RETEST #430B 430C RETEST //430B '. ' ' .... . 6.5' 7.3 134.7 .141.0 95 ' 96 Complies College blvd 79+50 E lane RETEST #431B 431C RETEST 1/431B ' ' ' ' 7.3 7.3 131.2 141.0 95' , 93 Does,not comply College blvd 82+50 Elane ,RETEST //432B 43'2C RETEST./1432B 7.4 ' .7.3 131.5 141.0 • : 95 .94 Does noltcomp'ly College blvd 84+00 E lane ' ' ' ' RETEST //433B 433C 'RETEST 1/ 433B ' ' ' 7.6 7.3 134.3 141.0 ' . 95 96 Coñiplies College blvd 10'E of 4 85+00 . ' RETEST #478 478A ,E lane RETEST 1/478 ' 7.3 ' 7.3 .135.8 141.0 95 ' 97 Complies College 'blvd 88+00 E lane 0 . ' RETEST //479' 479A RETEST //479 ' ' 7:0 7.3 133.6 141.0 95 95 ' ' Complies College blvd 91+00 E lane 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' RETEST /1480 480A RETEST #480 ' :. . 6.1 7.3. .134.1 141.0 95 95 ' Complies College blvd 94+00 .E 'lane ' ' ' ' ' ' RETEST //81 481A RETEST #481 . . ' ' 6.9 ' .3 135.0 141.0 95 96 , Complies College 'blvd 96+00 E lane : , RETEST /1482 482A RETEST #482 ' 6.9 7.3 135.1 141.0 95 ' 96 . Complies College blvd 98+00 E lane " ' . ' . ' . RETEST #483 483A RETEST //483 ' ' 7.4 7.3 135.3 141.0 .95 96 ' 'Complies College blvd 70+50 E lane ' 0 , RETEST //428C 428D RETEST 1/428C '' ' 8.6 7.3.. 136.9 141.0 95 97 Complies Blvd Imnrovments Page 3 TESTS No. MOIST. - . . - LOCAT I O N . IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE. DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. RE M A R K S 429D C ollege blvd 73+50 E lane RETEST 1/429C . . . 8.0: . 7.3 . 134.8 141.0 95 95 RETEST-' #429C Complies 431D College blvd - 79+50 E lane RETEST # 431C 6.3 7.3 134.7 141.0 . . .95 . 96 RETEST #431C Complies 432D College blvd 82+50 E lane RETEST #_432C .- . 7.0 . 7.3 . 133.5 141.0 95 95 RETEST #432C Comp1is 484 College blvd 70+00 W lane . ' 6.4 7.3 130.9 141 .0 05 93 Dooc comply 485 . College. blvd 73+00 W lane 6.1 7.3 130.6 141.0 ' 95 .93 Does not comply 386 College blvd 76+00 W lane 5.1 7.3 128.3 141.0 95 91 Does note-comply 484ARETEST College blvd 70+00W:.1ane #484 - . 6.3 7.3 . 135.7 . . 141.0 . 95 S 96 RETEST #484 Complies 485ARETEST College blvd 73+00 W lane #485 , '- 6.1 ' 7.3 . 133.9 . ' 141.0 95 95 RETEST #485 'Complies 486A College blvd 76+00 W lane RETEST #486' . . , 6.2 ' 7.3 . 131.0 141..0 95 93 RETEST 11486 Does not comply 487 College blvd 79+00 W lan.e 7.2 7.3 135.2 . 141.0 , 9'5' 96. Complies 488 College blvd 81+00 W lane , 5.9 7.3. 134.1 141.0 95 95 Complies 489 College blvd 84+00 W lane ,. 5.8 7.3 137.6 141.0 95 98 Complies 490 College blvd 87+00 W lane 6.3 7.3' , 126.7 . 141.0 . 95 - .90 Doesñot comply t 1) City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 - Attn: Pat Entezari r ---_----_.---___ LLL.jS/Lowry Attn: - Kurt Gierlich' 105Y0_V-iaF=o era P.O. Box 28100 - TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY Steven P. North County Branch Manager S.. 1 7 ' Testing Engineers-San Diego 1,7z , , A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. . : ____/ 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92.138(69)225-9641. Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92,054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS 5. 11/10/87 . LOCATION Côllee.BldCàr1sbad DATE OF TEST_________________ . FILE No_..)LJY . PROJECT Blvd Improvements LAB. No__087-5 62 DATE OF REPORT 12/10/87 CONTRACTOR . . Tr L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE . R E M 'A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 87+00 W lane '8'Wof centerline .. . S RETEST'#490 490A RFTFT #LIQO 7.3 126.8 141.0 . 95. 90 Does not comply 491 College blvd 90+00W lane 101 E of CL ______ 5.8 7.3 131.5 141.0 :5: 94. Does not comply 492 Collee blvd 93+00 .0 lane 61 W of CL 5.8 7,3 131.5 141.0 95 94 Does ndt comply 493 College blvd 96+00 W lane 71 E of CL . 6.0 7.3 ' 128.7 . 141.0 . 95 . 92 Does not comply .494 College blvd 98+00 W lane 11'W.of CL 5.3 7.3 131.1 141.0 95 93 Does not comply .87+00 W lane 8'W of.centerliie . S . 5 5 5 • . 5 5 RETEST #490A 490B RETEST #490A S 6.0 573 129.7 141.0 95 92 Does not comply 90+00 W lane 15' E of centerline S S . RETEST #491. _j)....' RETEST #491 5. 5.1 7.3. . 133.5 141.0 95 95 . Complies • 93+00 W lane S S S RETEST4492 492A RETEST #492 5 6.5 7.3 . 130.2 141.0 95 93 Does not comply 96+00 W.lane . S •• S S S S S. S , RETEST. #493 . 4931k RETEST #493 5.8 7.3 129.6 141.0 1 95 92 . DoesnoticomDly 98+00 W lane . .. S . S S S . RETEST #494 494A RETEST #494 5 5 5 5.4 5 7.3 .131.6 141.0 95 Does not comply. THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING ör:FAcTUAL DATA -DERIVED FROM S TESTS MADE BYTESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES.' . S S THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. 1- . . • 2.. . . - -TESTING ENGINEERS .SANDIEGO ..• S S REVIEWED BY. • - 1) City bf Carlsbad 1) NBS/Lowry . S • . S. S . S • • •' North County ranch Manager -. fliJ Testing Engineers-San Diego •• - iWARE A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 KurtzSt., P.O. Box80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 -' 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE-.DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/11-14/87 : LOCATION Carlchad FILE No. 5259 ... PROJECT_College blvd improvements •. LAB. Ilo _087-572 DATE OF REPORT 12/11/87 CONTRACTOR . . . . .. TEST No - . L 0 CA T I 0 N . IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP.' REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K $ 90C Col loge RETEST blvd #490R W lane 87+00' .. . 5-9 .. 7.3 . 1-335. '141.0 . . - 95 . . 95 : RETEST #490B' Complies 492B College RETEST blvd W lane #492A" --- 93+00 . 57 7.3 135.5 141.0 95 : 96 RETEST #492A Compliec 493B .College RETEST -blvd #493A W lane 96+00 . . . . . : 5.6 7.3 . . 133.8 141.0 95 95 . . RETEST #493A Complic. 494B College RETEST blvd W lane # 494A . 98+00 . . . 5 . . . . .7.3 135..2 0 141.0 0 95 . 96 RETEST #494A Cnmpliec 495 College blvd 70+25 E lane 9'F -of Cl-6.0. 7.3 134.0 ..... 141.0 ..9 . 9 Compliec 496 College blvd 73+)) E lane 6'E of CL 6.1 7.3 .135.3 .141.0 .95 96 Complies 497 . College _blvd 79+00_Elane.i.0'Wof _CL .6.5 7.3, 1.36.7 141.0 95 97 Complies 498 College blvd 79+00Elane.8'E_ofcL.: 5•5 731 135.6 141.0 95 96 0 "Complies_' 499 College blvd824-DOE lane 10'WofCL 7.7. 7.3 138.0 141.0 95 .98 .Complies 500 College blvd 84+00E lane 7'EofCL 7.7 1 7.3 133.6 141.0 95 . 95 1 Complies - THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS' CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM - 0 TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO, FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. n 1 1 nnr k 1 tn-I 4 n,nv.n t,nmnn + r fl.tt•S •) -r EST L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 11-14 . 501 College blvd 85+00 E lane 6.4 . 7.3 . 137.3 141.0 95 98 Complies 502 College blvd 88+00 ,E lane 5.7 7.3 136-.3 141.0 95 97 Complies 503 College blvd 91+00 E lane. 6.6 7.3 138.2 141.0 95 98 Complies 504 College blvd 93+00 Elane 6.9 7.3 134.3 141-0 9-s 96 Complies 505 College blvd 98+00 E lane 5.8 7.3 134.9 141.0 95 96 Complies 506 College blvd 98+00 E lane 6.2 .7 .3 135.7 141 0 95 97 Comp1ic t TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO 1 )+ City of .Carlsbad REVIEWED BY 11)NBS/Lowry7 Steven P. Kob"~#, North County Branch Manager Testing Engineers—San Diego r A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. !It14\ 3467 Kurtz St., P.O..-Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138 (619) 225-9641 I =) 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 / DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OFTEST 11 - 17-87 JOB DATACarisbad,_CA FILE No 5259 PROJECT _Coil PRP H1 Uri LAB. No_08'7 -589 DATE OF REPORT 12-1 5-87 CONTRACTOR_ EST - LOG AT 10 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM .- MOIST. IN PLACE. DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP PERCENT RELATIVE - R E MA R K $ '40 MOIST DENSITY REQUIRED COMP - College Blvd S approach to college 07 58'W __ofCenterline _El___Camino 4.6 7__3 127__6 141 95 91 Does __n0t_6mp1y - Real 240'S ofc Centerline Colleg College Blvd S approach to coil age 50 1 W_of _CLEl _Camino __Real_120'S 5_7 7_ 13 _1 A141 95 Compiis of Centerline College College Blvd S approach to Coil age 09 20'S__of. _CL College, 48'Wof_CL 5.2 7___3 128 _3 141 95 91 Does not _comply 1l Camino Real I THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY -TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN. DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. S THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB' CONTROL. TEST No. . ,L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY, DENSITY MAX. DaY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 510 CbU€ rrsiiai 59+50 c -iter1ine 22.7 14.0 95.5 117.0 90 82 Does rot coiply 511 College nhan 66+50 citer1ar .15 .6 14 0 100.3 117.0 90 86 Does rot crrrply 512 / College rre±iar 85+00 cmterLr 16.8 12.1 '105.2 121 .0, 90 87 Does rot amply 513 College 93+00 16.4 12.1 105.2 121.0 90 87 cr not a5rply 514 College rraan 81+75 17.3 12.1 10.2 .1 121.0 90 84 Does rot cxrp1y 515 College niian75+75 13.0 14.0 104.7 117.0 90 90 CbTpLies 50A It1±St #507 0b11Eg9 S ajprtath 240'S of CL GaUegp . 6.2 7.3. 131.3 141.0 95 * 93 [)srrjt crjrnly 1LST #507 507B college S approach 240'S of CL College ju±r #507A 5.6 7.3 135.9 141.0 95 97 CarpLies FE= #507A 508A Cb11€g B1d S approach to College 50-W of CL El Canino Fbal 120'S of CL itu±si #508 6.9 7.3 135.9 141.0 95 96 OXPLies iaisr #508 516 chi N prn±1 275'N of cmt-r1ir Cb11e 5.2 7.3 133.6 141.0 95 95 Omplies 517 College N approach 125'N of cterLre Cb11ejj 6.3 7.3 135.0 141.0 95 96 Cbiplaes 509A cb1kg 6gr03th oenterline of college ktithsr#509 6.5 - 7.3 135.2 141.0 95 96 - 03TPlies -- tc - - City_of Car-1--bad - TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO 1)_ REVIEWED BY "St P. Kbbzef¼\ Nrth Canty Br iiJI Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. : in J 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985,.SanDiego, Ca. 92.138(619)225-9641. - 2956 Industry Street Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 17f_R/97 - LOCATION Cr1Fhd FLE No.___5295 _________________ PROJECT OaLlegg B1'vd., PEO1t #3188 "a. NO 087-592 DATE OF REPORT '12-15-87 CONTRACTOR TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N - IN - PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT. RELATIVE. COMP. . 0 '. R E M -A R K $ - 518 6 QD]J. tsie 75+50 16.3 14 1 :108.8 117.0 90 93 Omphes 519 10aUeq'e' Etse 70+00 12.3 14.1 107 9 117.0' 90 100 OjrpLies 520 Cb11€cje EtsaIe 68+05 16.6 14 1 101.5 117 0 90 87 Does rot cxjrply 521 0b1kg Estse 62+75 14.9 -- 14.1 109.7 117.0 90 94 Qj-rp1i 522 Cb11egEstsaei158+00 12.3 - 14_1 —_103 9 117.0 90 89 DDes rot airply 523 Cb1J. Estsiie 56~00 14.2 14.1 103.8 117.0 90 89 Doesnot (X)Tply 524 QU€gEstside97+80 16_4 14_1 98_6 117_0 90 84 Des not arp1y 525 0b11e Etsice 92-i-02 189 14_1 101_0 117_0 90 86 Does 526 apilece Fts89+50 19_5 14_1 101_7 117_0 90 87 Et not a:nply 527 CaLlege_Etside604-10 14_7 14_1 107_7 117_0 90 92 Cbrplaes THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL Cb11a B1sxL. Prrrie± #3188 . . 7 TEST No. ' - L 0 C A T I 0 N - N, PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. Dnv DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 528 Bastside 4- 203 14.1 97.6 ' 117.0 90 83 Does rot xnp1y 529 aDllegee B.h.d Fstske 78+10 19.2 14.1 . 96.3 117.0 90 82 Does rot apply 523A 0b11Etsie56+00 ii±sr#523 16.2 14.1 110.4 117.0 90 94 applies FEIESr#523 322A Cb11B Et 58+00 ktfl±1#522 12.0 14.1 108.9 117.0 90 93 1np1 i-€i±si #522 320A GaUege Etskè 68+05 1ai±3r #520 18.7 14.1 112.6 117.0 90 96 03Tp1i taBr #520 529A CbJJ Eastsice 78+.50 Fui±5r #529 16.6 14.1 107.3 117.0 90 92 - applies ttaisi #529 528A \ Cb1J.. Etsice 85+00 ktLEi #528 , 14.7' 14.1 107.7 117.0 90 92 applies r #528 526A sr#526 1 17.6 14.1 100.7 117.0 90 ' 92 anpUes. k11'#526 12-8 524A Opllege Wests.i92+05 Fiusr#524 " . 11.6 14.1 118.7 117.0 90' 100applies' H=#524 523A 3D11j Untsicb 97+80 IIST #523 21 .7, 14.1 101.6 117.0 90 89 DDes not apply' bU]S1 #523 530 3a11eg tAts1de 961-00 10.7 14.1 120.7 117.0 90 100 1tTp1a 531 DaUgge Westside89+25 ' 15.7 , 14.1 , , 111.1 ' 117.0 90 95 applies p. College Blvd., Proje± #3188 . . Page 3 TEST IN OPTIMUM IN PLACE MAX. DRY - PERCENT PERCENT No L 0 C A T I 0 N PLACE MOIST. ' MOIST. - DRY DENSITY. DENSITY REL. COMP. REQUIRED RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K $ 532 CtUBft Bh.d 83+75 ts3 ç .11 .7 14.1 117.7 117.0 90 1(0 CaThes %. 4 .1 tc 1) City of C~ir1sh1 . -- . . . . TESTING ENGINEERS -SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY - Stoven Vc brth . - -. ii Testing Engineers—San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O.Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside, California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS 1,N F.A'CE DENSITY -TESTS DATE OF TEST 12/9-15/87 ' LOCATION Carlsbad . FILE No. 5295' S ' PROJECT College Blvd Project #3188 L..o. No. 087-654 DATE OF REPORT 12J2/R7 ' 'CONTRACTOR TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE ' R E M A R K S MOIST. DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. (sidewalk) 533 El camino Real120'N of _College.blvd 10.1 .7.3 123.9 141.0 '90 88 Does not comply (sidewalk). 534 El Camino Real 60'NofCollege'Blvd 19.7 17.5 '106.3 112.0 90 95 Complies 12-9 NUCLEAR DNSITY '. . . . _, . .... (sidewalk)' 535 ElCamino Real 0+130Eof College Blvd 5.1 7.3 128.1 141.0 ' 90 91 Ccfnplies (sidewalk.) 536 El Camino Real 0+080EofCollege _Blvd 7.7 7.3 125.1 141.0 90 ' 89 , Does not _caiiply ('sidewalk) 537 ElCaminoRealQ+030EofCollegeBlvd 10.7 7.3 111.3 , 118.0 90 95 Complies L2-10 538 sidewalk83+00Elane 26 _3 23 _5 87 _0 104__0 90 84 Doesnotcomply 539 sidèwalk'73+50E lane ' _',, 21.0. 20.5" 96.3 108.0 90 ' 90 ' Complies _. 540 sidewalk 66+50E lane ', 23.6 23.5 .. 9.1 104.0 90 _.' 86 Does not cariply 541 55+50 sidewalk E lane 22.4 23.5 92.8 104.0 . 90_- 89 ' Doesnotcomply THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FA C T U A L D A T A D E R I V E D F R O M TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED P R O C E D U R E S . THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. College Blvd Project #3188 _______ _________ •. Page 2 _____ _________ _________ TEST No. L 0 C A T 1 0 N IN, PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE - :DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. R E M A R K S 542 Telephone line crossing - Thtersection College Palomar Airport Rd. - of : 4.7 8.5 127.5 :138.0 95 93 Does not comply 543 Telephone crossing -Intersection of • College & Palomar Airport Rd. 4.1 8.5 131'.O 138.0 95. 95 Ccniplies 7 - -, • - • TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO 1) City of Carlsbad - - REVIEWED BY -. 1) NBS/Lowry • - - - -• • : - - -- - Steven P.. Kobze' - - • , - - f'Iofth County Branch Manager, - - .-- - - - I co LU GO 01 U LU —) 1 fIJI Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing m Copany Inc - 3467 Kurtz St,PO Box 80985, San Diego, Ca 92138(619)225-9641 EIIIIIJ 2956 Industry Street, Oceanside California 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS IN. PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST 11/17-18/87 - LOCATION Cr1shd FILE No 5259 PROJECT_College Blvd.,Improvements LAB. No. 088120 DATE OF REPORT-1/2 0/88 CONTRACTOR TEST NO. L 0 C A T I 0 N IN PLACE OPTIMUM . MOIST. IN PLACE - DRY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE . . REMARKS MOIST. . DENSITY REQUIRED COMP; 11/17 College Blvd South approach 58'W of . . 544 centerline El Camino Real 240'S of CL 4.6 197 A. 1 IL 1 .0 95 91 . Does not complyL" S. approach 50'W of. centerline El 545 Camin6 Real 120'S of- centerline Col1e e 5.7 7.3 133.1 141.0 95 95 Complies S approach 20'S of centerline College 546 48'W of centerline El Carnino Real 5.2 . / 7.3 . 128.3 141.0 95 91 .. Does not comply/ 547 College median St# 59+50 centerline 22 7 14 0 95.5 117.0 90 82 Does not comply. 548 College median St/I 66+50 centerline 15.6 - 14.0 100.3 117.0 90 86 Does not comply 549 College median St/I 88+00 centerline 16.8 12.1 105 2 121.0. 90 87 Does not comply / Does not comply' 550 '. College median SO 93+00 16.4 12.1. 105.2 121.0 90 .. .87 551 College median St/I81+75 . . 17.3 12.1 102.1 121.0 90 . 84 Does not comply 552 College Median St/I75+75 : . 13.0 14.0 . 104.7 117.0 90 . 90 . Complies 11/18 Retest #544 S approach 240'S of 544A centerlineCollege _.. .6.2 -..7.3 _- 131.3 141.0 95 .93 - Does •not.complyRetest544 THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE.THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. College Blvd, Improvements .. Page 2 TEST . . . ,. S LO C A 1- I 0 N . .. . - IN, ,. PLACE OPTIMUM MOIST.. It'd PLACE Day MAX. DAY DENSITY . PERCENT REL. COMP. PERCENT RELATIVE . R E M A R 1< s - . MOIST. . DENSITY REQUIRED COMP. 240'S of centerline College . .. . . . . '544B Retest 1/544A S approach -. .5.6 7.3. .135.9 141.0 95 97 Complies: Retest //544A Retest //545 545A South approach . - 6.9 7.3 .1352 141.0 95: . 96 Complies Retest //545 N approach 275'N of 553 centerline College . - - 5.2 7.3 133.6 141.0 95 - 95- Cbmplies N approach 125.'N 554 at centerline College . . . 6.3 .: 7.3 135.0 141.0 95 . 96. Complies Retest #546 Approach centerline. . 546A . S. of College . . 6.5 73 135.2 . 141.0 95 . 96 Complies RPtPSt /54E ,. .