HomeMy WebLinkAbout3557; Carlsbad Blvd Bridge Retrofit; Carlsbad Blvd Bridge Retrofit; 2006-11-01( ilA ni'( •;irisb;kl
5','5fl i:i Uimimi Real
(, ;ii lsh;.|d. ('A ')2008
3557" f
Novcnilx:r 1. 2(H)6
Conlraci.No.,:
Aitciiliion: Mr. Duaiie Soilcaii
•i'-'*- '• Ajjril.rjK.I'r'tl t.'omi'ao-1-ioii Report
( i\v\<.\xu\ I'ilv.cl,
i:;irlsb;id. ( VV
1 >c;ir Vll", Scilca
in acciM-danrc ^vMh ymr rcc|ucsl. Icslino iMiyineerK San Diego ( l l-SD) has ennducled oradiih.
ntea v;,i,,>ns and coiiipaclion icsiaig ctn il.c carlhwork perlbi-^i.cd al llic ah.>vc i^fcrenced pm,cci
siic. Servicer. dc:;cnlvd licrcin vvere provided by Jf-.SD froin May I I . 2006 lo Scpiemher 13. 2(ll)f,.
A rcprcscniahvc ol ihis olficc observed and leslcd ihc miscellaneous backlillinti upcralions (, e
i'ridiic abniineiiis. vvum walls, and appurlenani ieatiires) in connection with the brid-e relrolii.
.Miininarics ol iaboralnrv and Held eoinpaeiion lesi results are provided in Appendix A. Tallies'
iand 2. rcspeclively. impori malerials Nverc nscd ibr I'iie rclaimnf, vvail baeknil. d he backllli sv;,,s
I'laeed- rompaeied. and lesled Ibr coinpli;inec willi a niiniinnm;')()'M,»;nKl 95% relaiive conipaeiii'in
reiplirenieni. as ap|ilicable. . ' '
II should b, uoled liial Ihe precision of the Held and labomlory maxinnnn drv dens,4 lesi resnlK
are snbieei |M vanalion mliereni willi testing procedures and lieteiooene.uis material
eleuaeierisiies, Uuaniiiaiive values ok testing precision have been doeun,emed hv the Ainene in
>ocieiy ol lesnng and Malerials. |-or example, results indicate the aee.irace oMhe ASTM D-
ICS! lo be plus ..r n.iinis Tpereenl ok ihc mean densitv. Based (in this inlbrinaiion relaiive
e.-mpaeliou reh^nlls should.be inierpreled as approximaic values subject lo variations in kueral and
\ en leal direeiions.
Knrvev' lines and elevations relative grade modilkations. Una! desimi ura.ies. locations ok
\anuns elements, etc., vvere esiiiblishetl by others. ' "
kield MM„iiorin=^ services provided by d.is ofnce. consisting okvdsnal bbservalion ok compaction
oi.eratams and rand.im iu-place density, test, are iniended as assistance to the owner/client in
'nomiorme apparent reasonable eOm,,liance wilh Ihe project eailhvvork specilkations khe
Picenee ul our licki represcnialive during the work progress did not involve anv (hreci
•iipervision o( die coniraelor/subcoutraclor. Technical advice and sin,i.esii„ns ^vere nrovided
Hl'ou reqnesi based upon the results ok the tesis and observations. In ai^' case: no vvarramv or
.ie:,pousihibl\ lor ihe coiiiractor s perhninance is intended or implied.
Tesring Engineers San Diego, Inc.
.-i tSurirau Vcriiiis Company
/S95 Convoy ("ijtift, ^iuiie !H
S'.ui Diego, 0\ 921 1 1
Main; (858)715-^800
(858 715-5810
wwvv.us.bua-aiiveri!;i.5,a
City of Carlsbad
OH Bridge Retrofit Contract No.: 134834
Based on the observations and testing made during construction by TESD representatives it is our
opmton that the nnscellaneotts backfill earthwork was constructed in gene.^1 Lnfonnrce i h Z
Z r I'HT'' '"'^ ^P-'^ificarions, and is considered to be suLle for .he intettded u e f
you should have any questions afler reviewing this report, please do nof hesitate S ZnZ'ihe
undersigned at(858) 715-5800 oo« f'csiwie to cgoii^Xlhe
Respectfully submitted,
TESD. Inc.
Nick Traey El i
Stafl'Engineer
y
I'Ja. C-50IAS
e>i. 6,-30; G 5
RCE. RGE
ill
Principal G eotech n ica I EW|iiniglr
Van W. Olin. GE 257"^
AlUichnicnLs,' Appcnili.\ :V l able 1 and Tahic 2
Disliihiiiii ('!) .Addressee*
"Includes copies tor tildp, depannieiU siibniliial
City of Carlsbad
OH Bridge Retrofit Contract No.: 134834
Appendix A
City of Carlsbad
OH Bridge Retrofit Contract No.; 134834
TABLE 1
RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS
(ASTM-D.I557)
SAMPLE tt DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM MOISTURE
DENSITY (PCF) CONTENT (%)
On-site: Yellowish-Browh Poorly Graded 113 5
' SAND with Silt 12.0
On-site: Orange-Brown Silty SAND 123.5 11.0
Contract Number: '
Project Name:
Location:
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad, California
Test
#
Sample Test
Date
7/10/2006
Test Location Ele.
Moisture
Field Opt
Dry Density (pcf)
Field Maximum
Relative Compaction
Obtained Required
Conform
Non-Confomi
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
• 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Bent 5 footing b.f. 5' E of E wall, 32'N of S
End
7/1 p/2006 Bent 5 footing b.f 10' W of W wall, 10'N
of S End
7/10/2006 Bent 5footing b.f 10' WofWwall 20'S
-ofNEnd
7/12/2006 Bent 5 10'W of W face, 20'N of S end
7/12/2006 Bent,5 lO-W.ofW face,.lO'S of N end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 5' E of E face, 20'N of S
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b;f. E of E face, 10'S of N
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 5! E of E face. 30'S of N
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 stope b.f, 10 'E of E face. 20-N of
S end
7/12/i2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f. 10 'E of E face, 40'N of
Send
8/9/2006 Bent 2 E face 20'N of S end
8/9/2006 Bent 2 E face, 40'N of S end •
8/9/2006, Bent 2 E face. 30' N of S end
8/11/2006 Bent 2; W face, 30' N of S end
8/11^006 Bent 2. Wface, 30' N of S end
8/14/2006 Bent 2, W face, 30' N of S end
8/14/2006 Bent 2, Wface, 15'Nof Send
8/14/2006 Bent 2. E face, 25' N of S end
8/i 5/2006 Bent 2,10' S of N end
8/15/2006 Bent 2: 20'S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent2,.N wing wall, 15' S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, N wing wait, 15' S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, S wing wall, 15' N of S end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, S wing wall, 15'N of S end
20.5
20:5
20,5
22.5
22.5
22.5
24.5
26.5
285
30.5
20.5
22.6
23;5
20.5
22.5
24.5
26,5
26,0
27.5
29.5
27.5
29.5
27.5
29.5
12:4% 12.0% 109.3 113:5 96% 95% Conform
12.8% 12.0% 108.2 113.5 95% 95% Conform
13,2% 12:0% 109.3 113.5 96% 95% Conform
12.8% 12.0% 108:9 113.5. 96% 95% Conform
13;2% 12.0% 109.4 113.5 96% 95% Conform
12.4% 12:0% 109:9 113.5-97% 95% Conform
12.4% 12:0% 108.1 113.5 95% 95% Conform
13:2% 12,0% 108.8 , 113.5 96% 95% Conform
12.8% 12.0% . 107:4 113.5 95% 90% Conform
13:6% 12:0% 107.3 113.5 95% 90% Conform
12.8% 11.0% -118,9 .123.5 96% 95% Conform 12:4% 11.0% 118:2 , - 123,5 96% 95% Conform
11.9°/i 11.0% 119.2 123.5 97% 95% Conform
11.9% 11.0% 118.4 123.5 96% 95% Conform
12.4% 11.0% 117.8 123.5 95% 95% Conform
12.8% 11.0% 118.3 123.5 96% 95% Conform 11.1% 11:0% 119.6 123:5 97% 95% Conform
11.9% 11.0% 117:8 123.5 95% 95% Conform 12:8% 11.0% 118.6 123.5 96% . 95%. Conform
11:5% 11.0% 119.5 123.5 97% 95% Confonn
12.8% ir.o% 118.1 123:5 96% .95% " Conform
11.1% -ii:6% 119.1 123.5 96% 95% Conform
11.9% 11:0% 119.7 123.5 97% 95% Conform
11.9% 11.0% 117.9 123.5, 95% 95% Cijnform
ContracI Number.
Project Name:
Location:
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Cartsbad. Califomia
Test
25
Sample Test
Date
Test Location Ele.
31.5
Mois ture Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction Conform
Non-Conform Field Opt Field IVlaximum Obtained | Required
Conform
Non-Conform
2 8/30/2006 Bent 2, VV side, 30' S of N end of wing"
wall
25A 2 8/30/2006 Retest #25
26 2 8/30/2006 Bent 2, W side; 10'W of face, 45'S of N
end of wing wall
27 2 8/31/2006 Bent 2, W side. 10'W of face, 30'S of N
end of wing wali
28 2. 8/31/2006 Bent 2, W side, 10'W of face, 30'Nof S
end of wing wall
29 2 8/31/2006 Bent 2, W side. 10' W of face, center of
wall
,30 2 9/1/2006 Bent 2, W side, 10'W of wall, 25-S of N •
end of N wing wall
31 2 9/1/2006 Bent2, Wside, 10'Wofwalk35'NorS
end ofS wing wall
32 2 9/1/2006 Bent 2, W side, 15'Wof wa«, 40'S of N
end of N wing wall
33 2 9/1/2006 Bent 2, W side. 10' W of wait, 25' N of S
end of S wing wall
34 2, 9/5/2006 Abbut 1 and Bent 2 bf, 14'E of W face
Bent 2,60'S of N end of wing wall
35 2 9/6/2006 E face Bent 2,1.5'E of face, 35'S of N
end of wing wall
36 2 9/7/2006 E face Bent 2, 1.5'E of face, 35'S of N
end of wing wall
37 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5,10'E Of E face, 10'N of S end
38 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5, 10'E of E face, 10'S of N end
39 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5,10'E of E face, 30'N of S end
to 1 9/8/2005 Bent 5, 25' E of E face, 15' N of S end
11 1 9/8/2005 Benl5,<^25'EdfEface,25'SofN end
42 2. 9/11/2006 Bent 2.2'W of Wface, 5'N Of Send of
wing wall
31.5
33.5
11.1%
12.4%
11.0%
11.0%.
120,3
116.2
123.5
123.5
97%
94%
95%
90%
Conform
Conform
35:5 11.5% 11.0% 116,4 123.5 94% 90% Conform
35.5 12.4% 11.0% 116.9 123.5 95% 90% Conform
35.5 11.1% 1L0% 117.4 123.5 95% 90% Conform
37.5.^ 11.9% 11.0%, 115,1 123.5 93% 90% Conform
37.5 12.8% 11:0% . 116.1 123:5 94% 90% Conform
39.5 11.1% 11.0% 114.5 123.5 93% 90% Conform
39.5 12.4% 11.0% 115.1 123.5 93% 90% Conform
41.5 12.4% 11.0% 112.3 123,5 91% 90% Conform
28:0 11.5% 11.0% 118.3 123.5 96% 95% Conform
30.0 11.1% 11.0% 119.5 123.5 97% 95% Conform
32:5 13.6% 12.0% 104.8 113,5 92% ^, 90% Conform
34.5 12.8% 12:0% 104.4 113.5 92% 90% Conform 36.5 14.1% 12:0% 103.3 113.5 91% .90% Conform 38.5 13.6% 12.0% 105.5 113.5 93% 90% Conform 40.5 12.4% 12.0% 104.9 113.5 92% 90% Conform
35.5 11.9% 11.0% 118.1 123,5 96% 95% • Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad, California.
Test
#
Sample Test
Date
Test Location Ele.
Moisture
Field Opt
Dry Density (pcf)
Field I Maximum
Relative Compaction
Obtained I Required
Conform
Non-Conform
43 2 9/11/2006 Bent 2, 2'W of Wface, 5'N of Send of
wing wall
37:5 12:4% 11.0% 119.0 123:5 96% 95% Conform
44 2 9/11/2006 Bent 2,10' W ot W face, 5'N of S end of
wing wall
39.5 11.1% 11.0% 119:8 123.5 97% 90% Conform
45 2 9/11/2006 Bent 2, 5' E of abbutment, center wall 41.5 11.5% 11.0% 118.2 123.5 96% 90% Conform
46 2 9/11 /2006 Bent 2,1' N of W face, 15' S of N end of ,
wing wall
FSG 11.1% 11-0% 120:3 123:5 97% 95% Conform
47 2 9/11/2006 Bent 2, 1' W of W face. 5' N of S end of
wing wall
FSG 11.9% 11.0% 119:6 123:5 - 97% 95% Conform
48 , . 2 9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 5' S of S end. Bent 2 wing
wall
FG 12.8% 11.0% 112.2 123:5 91% 90% Conform
49 2 9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 10' N of S end, Bent2
wing wall
FG 11.9% 11.0% ' 113.4 123:5 92% 90% Conform
50 2 9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 30' N of S end. Bent 2
wing watt
FG 12.4% 1,1.0% 113.6 123.5 92% 90% Conform
51 2 9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, center wall. Bent 2,15'W
of west face
FG 11.9% 11.0'% 111.9 123.5 91% 90% Conform
52 2. 9/13/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 50' S okN end. Bent 2
wingwall
FG 12.4% 11.0%; 112.7 123.5 91% 90% Conform
53 2 9/13/2006 W 1.5:1 slope. 20' S of Nend, Bent2,10'
E of E face
FG 11.9% 11.0% 114.3 123,5 9i3% 90% Confonn
54 1 9/13/2006 W 1,5:1 slope, 15' S of N end, Beiit 5. 10'
E Of E face
FG 13:2% 12.0% 105.0 113.5 93% 90% Conform
55 1 9/13/2006 W 1:5:1 slope, 20' N of S end, Bent 5.10'
E of E face
FG 12:8% 12.0% 104,1 113.5 92% 90% Conform