HomeMy WebLinkAbout3557; Carlsbad Blvd Bridge Retrofit; Carlsbad Blvd Bridge Retrofit; 2006-04-25City of Carlsbad
5950 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attention: Mr. Duane Soileau
Subject: Laboratory Test Report No.
Project: OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad Blvd.
Carlsbad. CA
VER ITAS
May 26, 2006
Contract No.: 134834
RECEiVED^
MAY 3 0 2005
FNGIM KRING DKPAKl .MtNT
^'^^''^r ..ieiniVlSl()N
Dear Mr. Soileau,
Submitted herewith are the results of laboratory testing performed on an on-site material samples
being used as fill at the above referenced project site.
It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not
reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California
regulations regarding environmentaLconcerns.
These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do
not constitute engineering opinions or project control, h is the responsibility ofthe contractor to
schedule retests or re-inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a result
of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We
are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to
keep the work on schedule or caiTy it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and
all applicable codes.
Respectfully submitted,
TESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc.
Nick Tracy, EIT
Staff Engineer
(•ir
Van W. Olin, GE 2578
Geotechnical Department Manager
NT/VO
llislribiifidii: i 1) .Addressee
(I) Fieki 1-ile
Testing Engineers San Diego, Inc.
T'SV5 Convoy Coun, Suite IS
S;:n Dicno, CA 92! 1 1
M:.in; (858.) 7l3o800
FiL\:' (:S5S) 715-5810
'.vs\\v,us,bure:!uverif;t.^.coiri
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE - mm 0.01 0.001
% COBBLES % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT % CLAY 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1
SIEVE PERCENT
SIZE FINER
#4 100.0
#10 98.8
#20 9L9
#40 82.5
#60 55.4 #100 17.5
#200 7.1
SPEC.
PERCENT
PASS?
(X=NO)
Soil Description
Yellowish-Brown.Poorly graded sand with silt
PL=
D85= 0.467
D3o= 0.181
Cu= 2.93
USCS= SP-SM
Atterberg Linniits
LL=
Coefficients
D60= 0.267
0-15= 0.127
Cc= 1.35
Classification
AASHTO=
Pl=
•50= 0.233
D-|o= 0.0910
Remarlts
TESD NO. 17259 // SAND EQUIVALENT = 23
(no specification provided)
Sample No.: 17259 Source of Sample:
Location: Abbutment 5 spoils of footing overex., Spl #1 Date: 5/11/06
Elev./Deptii:
Client: City of Carlsbad
TESTING ENGINEERS Project: Carlsbad Blvd OH Bridge Retrofit
ProjectNo: SD 134834 Plate
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No.: 1
ProjectNo.: SD134834
Project: Carlsbad Blvd OH Bridge Retrofit
Location: Abbutment 5 spoils of footing overex., Spl #1
Elev./Deptli:
Remarl(s: TESD NO. 17259
IWIATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Description: Yellowish-Brown Poorly graded sand with silt
Date: 5/11/06
Classifications -
Nat. Moist =
Liquid Limit =
% > No.4 = 0.0 %
USCS: SP-SM AASHTO:
Sp.G. = 2.28
Plasticity Index =
%<No.200= 7.1 %
140
130
120
Q. 1 IVJ
c
Q 100
90
80
70
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 113.5 pcf
Optimum moisture =12%
1. V Test soecificatlonr
ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure A Modified ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure A Modified
100% SATURATION CURVES
FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO:
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.6
1 1 !
1 1
i •
1 1
1 i 1
:
1
i i I I i : ' 1
—j—J-' i ! I i 1 i 1 , 1 ....
1 i 1 I i ! 1 1 1^-
! i i
t ! i 1 ! ! i ' ! i i 1 1 i I i I
1 ; i ; ; j
!
i i ! T — I i i 1 1 \ \
i ^ ^ -_L...-..j. .4. lil! i 1
—
1 i i r i i i j
n
1 ; 1 iii! 1 1 - 1 ill! ! ! 1 i ; 1 i M 1
Water content, %
-TESTING ENGINEERS-Plate
Particle Size Distribution Report
500 100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE - mm
0.1 11 0.01 0.001
% COBBLES % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT % CLAY
0.0 0.0 85.2 14.8
SIEVE PERCENT
SIZE FINER
#4 100.0
#10 99.8
#20 94.8
#40 65.7
#60 29.6
#100 18.9
#200 14.8
SPEC*
PERCENT
PASS?
{X=NO)
Soil Description
Orangish-Brown Silty sand
PL=
•85= 0.630
•30= 0.252
USCS= SM
Attert)erq Limits
LL=
Coefficients
•60= 0.391
•15= 0.0778
Classification
AASHTO=
Pl=
•50= 0.341
•io=
Remarks
TESD NO. 17260 // SAND EQUIVALENT = 20
(no specification provided)
Sample No.: 17260 Source of Sample:
Location: Abuttment 1 spoils of Overex., Sample #2 Date: 5/11,/06
Elev./Depth:
TESTING ENGINEERS
Client: City of Carlsbad
Project: Carlsbad Blvd OH Bridge Retrofit
Project No: SD134834 Plate
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No.: 2
ProjectNo.: SDI34834
Project: Carlsbad Blvd OH Bridge Retrofit
Location: Abuttment 1 spoils of Overex., Sample #2
Elev./Depth:
Remarks: SD 17260
Date: 5/11/06
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Description: Orangish-Brown Silty sand
Classifications - USCS: SM
Nat Moist =
Liquid Limit =
%>No.4= 0.0%
AASHTO:
Sp.G. = 2.53
Plasticity Index =
%<No.200= 14.8%
o
Q.
c
T3
Q
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density =123.5 pcf
Optimum moisture = 11%
Sk. Test soecificatinn:
ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure A Modified ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure A Modified
— —
100% SATURATION CURVES
FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO:
— 2.8
2.7
2.6
— 2.8
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.6
—^
1
1 i
1 i i I
! ! 1
\ 1 1
1
1 i i 1
i 1 : i 1 1
T -1 i i 1 i 1
• 1
.1 • ' i 'i j ! 1 : ! • i i • 1 i 1 1 ' i 1 1 i j ' ! — 1—P*^
i 1 1 T , j i i 1 i -...[_ 1 !"' 1 i i 1 — 1 i ! i i
i 1 ! --—1 —r i ! : ! 1 1 i , iii; 1 ; i ; \
i •• 1 i --—1 —r i i i ! i i Iiij 1 t --4—• \ j
ilii
n r
i 1 1 i i i •i ^ i , i ... 1 i i i i 1 i j 1 --4—• j 1
Water content, %
-TESTING ENGINEERS-Plate
EXPANSION INDEX TEST
Date: May 25,2006
JobNo: SD134834
Client: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314
Report No: 9000
ENGINEER: VAN OLIN, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
REVIEWED BY:NICK TRACY, STAFF ENGINEER
PROJECT
SAMPLED BY:
SUBMITTED BY
PROCEDURE
CARLSBAD BLVD OH BRIDGE RETROFIT
TESD DATE: 5/11/06
TESD DATE: 5/11/06
ASTM D4829
Lab Number
Sample Identification / Location
17259 17260
Abbutment 5 spoils Abbutment 1 spoils
of footing overex. of overex.
Initial Moisture Content, %
Final Moisture Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Expansion Index
Fotential Ixpaision
9.5
20.9
112.2
51.2
I
Very Low
10.5
18.6
106.0
48.0
4
Very Low
COMMEPfFS:
CO
Q.
if)
ifi
LU
Ql I-
co
Ql
<
UJ
X
CO
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
-••
^3540 psf
1321 psf<
* 1947 psf
12 3 4
NORMAL STRESS (KRf\
LOCATION; On -site
LAB NUMBER: 17259
CLASSIFICATION: SP-SM
COHESION :C = 450(psl)
FRICTION ANG LE:37''
SCALE;=1:10
Title:
Testing Engineers - U.S. Labs
7S95 Convoy Court, Sulle IS
San Diego, CA 92111
Direct Shear Test
Project: Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
LL
CO
Q.
CO
CO
LU
(T
CO
a:
< m
X
CO
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
» 4156 psf^
> 3450 psf
' 1513 psf
1
1 2 3 4
NORMAL STRESS (KSF)
LOCATION: On -she
LAB NUMBER: 17260
CLASSIFICATION: SM
COHESIONC = 1450(psf)
FRICTION ANG LE:35°
SCALE:=1:10
f^l Testing Engineers - U.S. Labs
7895 Convoy Court, Suite IS
•:iiijjjn San Diego, CA 92111
Title: Direct Shear Test
Project: Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Drwn: NJT ContractNo: ^^^^^^
Date: May 26, 2006 Figure No: DS2
'•—r
1:1 tJ:iniiiHi KLMI
( ':nish;ul. ('A ')2i)U8
3S57- (
iN'ovcmlx-r 1. 2(ii')(i
• Conlract.No,: i:V|X.i4
•XllCDlil!!!
.SiilijL'1.1:
!'rnji.'v'i:
Mr. DiKine Soilciui
* >l i Briiii:i:.' Kcirohi
( MrLslxui Hlvtl.
! aiisbad. ('A
I K'iir Mr, S,.ilc:ii!:
In n.:c*.r,l:»Kvuilli ^onr rcquesl. I csl ing hingineers San Diego (TBI.)) |,i.s conducted ..radii...
..hsav;,i,on:, :ind cu.i.pacl.on icshng on the earllnvork per(r,rmed al ihc above rclcrcncod pro,ccl
•wic. Service:: dc:;cnhcd liciciii xvcrc provided by TbSI.) Ih.ni Max I I,. 2006 lo Sepieiiiber 1.^. 21)0^,.
A ivpivscnial.ve „l (his olTicc observed and leslcd lhe niiScellamioiis backfllhn^, opcralions (, e
iTulge ahiiuncnl:,. '.Miig walls, and :i[^piirlenanl lealiires) in conneelion wilh lhe bridue relrolii.
oanev ol lahornlnrv and licid enmpaelioii ie^a resillls arc provided n. Appendix A Table-
land respeciivclv. Inipu.1 malerials were used Iw the retaining wall hack 111 I. The back 111 I was
idaeed. eornpiteicd. and lesle.l li,, compliance wifh a mininnan W% and ivlaiive eompaeiion
rei|miemcni. as applicable.
I! shnnid bc noted lh:,l the precisinn ofihe Held and labo,:alorv maxinu.ni drv deiisnv lesi resniK
:iie siibieci i,i varuilion mheivni will, lesling procednres and licier.iocne.uis. nu.ierial
eleiracieiiM.c. i.ln;,nliralivc v:,lnes oflesling precision have been doennienled bv the A,nen< aii
.N.cieo ol k-slini^ and Malenals. l or ex:.niple. resnlls iiidicale lhe aceuracv oMlie ASTM I )-
le>i u. be pins .ir nnnns d percenl of ihe mean dcnsily. Based on ihis inh.rmaiion relative
c.anp:.ci,..„ rcsulis shuald be ini.rpreicd as approxinune values subjeel lo varialions m h,lend and
••••eriie;il oireeli>l||.^.
'^'"'"^ ''"^•^^'"'1 cicvaiiuns relative to grade inodilieaiions. Ilnal desiuii trades, locations r,!'
• ai hins clemeiils. ele. were eslablished by others. '
biei.l Mnniionn. :.erviees provide.l by ihis oniee. consistmg of visual observalinn uf compacli.ai
<'pe,:,la,ns and random m-p)acc densiiy lesi. are iniended as assistance lo ,hc o^vner/elien, m
n-onm.rme :,pparcnl reasonable compliance with ihc prniecl ea,lhw.,rk spccillealions Tl,e
presenee ol ,nn Held represenial,vc during the work process did no, „noKv anv' dn-ci
'•-"l''n:l"i-/snbeon,r:iclu,-. Technical advice and sn^ocst,ons ^ecr.•
apoii leqncsi-based upon the resnlls of the tests and observations. In -mv case in. wairaniv or
iesiioiisi|-,ilii>, lor the comiacior2s perlormance is iniended or implied.
Testing Engineers San Diego,. Inc
burruu VfHt,i.\ Compisuy
:iiyS C:iiiv,jy Cmir!, Suiit; IH M::in: (o5S,|.7 I >:5.SO0
Tax; {SiSriS-sSlO
wwv/.us,l:Hirfjuveri;;«.a)ni
City of Carlsbad
OH Bridge Retrofil Contract No.: 134834
Based on tlic observations and testing made during construction by TESD representatives it is our
opinion that the miscellaneous backfill earthwork was constructed in general conformance \viih the
approved project plans and specifications, and is considered to be suitable for Ihe intended use If
you should have any questions afler reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to conlaet 'the
undersigned at (858) 715-5800. ^iuici.^mc
Respectfully submitted,
TESD. Inc.
Nick Tracy. EIT
Staff Engineer
4--
\eX::-:;^.^P^^
Van W. Olin. GE 257?
Principal GeotechnicallSwIiiffCei^
....
N t7V( I
Aiiiifhrncnu: .Appcn.li.s ,.\: lal)le 1 ami Tiibli- 2
Di.sliihiiiiim (-1) .Addressee*
* Include coi)ies Ibr-Hldg. departmenl siibniillal
City of Carlsbad
OH Bridae Retrofit Contract No.: 134834
Appendix A
City of Carlsbad ^
OH Bridge Retrofit Conti^act No.: 134834
TABLE 1
RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS
(ASTM-D-1557)
SAMPLE.^ DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM MOISTURE
— DENSITY (PCF) CONTENT (%)
1 On-site: Yellowish-Brown PoorivGraded 113 5 ton
SAND with Silt
On-site: Orange-Brown Silty SAND 123.5 1.0
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad, California
Test Sample
#
Test
Date
7/10/2006
Test Location Ele.
Moisture
Field Opt
Dry Density (pcf)
Field I Maximum
Relative Compaction
Obtained Required
Confonn
Norj-Conform 1
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22 .
23
24
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Bent 5 footing b f. 5' E of E wall, 32'N of S
End
7/10/2006 Bent 5 footing b.f. 10'Wof Wwall, 10'N
OfS End
7/10/2006 Bent 5 footing b.f. 10'W of W wall, 20'S
OfNEnd
7/12/2006 Bent 5 10'W of W face, 20'N of S end
7/12/2006 Bent 5 10'W ofW face, 10'S of N end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 5' E of E face, 20'N of S
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 5' E of E face, 10'S of N
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 5' E of E face, 30'S of N
end
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 10 'E of E face, 20'N of
Send
7/12/2006 E 1.5:1 slope b.f, 10 'E of E face, 40'N of
Send
8/9/2006 Bent 2 E face 20'N of S end
8/9/2006 Bent 2 E face, 40'N of S end
8/9/2006 Bent 2 E face, 30'Nof Send
8/11/2006 Bent 2. Wface, 30' N of S end
8/11/2006 Bent2, Wface, 30'Nof Send
8/14/2006 Bent 2, Wface, 30' N of S end
8/14/2006 Bent 2, Wface, 15' N of Send
8/14/2006 Bent 2, E face, 25'Nof Send
8/15/2006 Bent 2, 10' S of N end
8/15/2006 Bent 2: 20'S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, N wing wall, 15' S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, N wing wall, 15' S of N end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, S wing wall, 15' N of S end
8/29/2006 Bent 2, S wing wall, 15' N of S end
20.5
20.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
24.5
26.5
28:5
30.5
20.5
22.0
23.5
20.5
22.5
24.5
26.5
26,0
27.5
29.5
27.5
29.5
27.5
29.5 .
12.4% 12.0%
12.8% 12:0%
20.5 13.2% 12.0%
12.8% 12.0%
13:2% 12.0%
12.4% 12.0%
12.4% 12.0%
13,2% 12,0%
12.8% 12.0%
13:6% 12:0%
12.8%
12:4%
11.9%
11.9%
12.4%
12.8%
11.1%
11.9%
12.8%
11.5%
12.8%
11.1%
11.9%
11.9%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11:0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
ii:o%
11:0%
109.3 113:5 96% 95% Confonn
108.2 113:5 95% 95% Conform
109.3 113.5 96% 95% Conform
108.9 113.5 96% 95% Conform
109.4 113.5 96% 95% Conform
109;9 113.5 97% 95% Conform
108.1 113.5 95% 95% Conform
108.8 113,5 96% 95% Conform
107.4 113.5 95% 90% Conform
107.3 113.5 95% 90% Conform
118.9 123.5 96% 95% Conform
118.2 123.5 96% 95% Conform
1192 123.5 97% 95% Conform
118.4 123.5 96% 95% Conform
117.8 123.5 95% 95% Conform
118.3 123.5 96% 95% Conform
119.6 123.5 97% 96% Conform
117.8 123.5 95% 95% Conform
118.6 123.5 96% 95% Conform
119.5 123:5 97% 95% Conform
118.1 123.5 96% 95% Conform
119.1 123.5 96% 95%. Conform
119.7 123.5 97% 95% Conform
117.9 123.5 95% 95% Confonn
Contract Number,
Project Name:
Location:
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad, Califomia
Test Sample
#
Test
Date
Test Location
25 2 8/30/2006 Bent 2, VVside, 30' S pf N end of wing
wall
25A 2 8/30/2006 Retest #25
26 2 8/30/2006 Bent 2, Wside, 10'W of face, 45'S of N
end of wing wall
27 2 8/31/2006 Bent 2, Wside, 10'Wof face, 30'S of N
end of wing wall
28 2 8/31/2006 Bent2, Wside, 10'Wofface, 30'NofS
end of wing wall
29 2 8/31/2006 Bent 2, Wside, 10'Wof face, center of
wall
30 2 9/1/2006 Bent2, Wside, 10'W ofwall, 25'S of N
end of N wing wall
31 2 9/1/2006 Bent2,Wside, 10'Wofvyall, 35'NofS
end ofS wing wall
32 2 9/1/2006 Bent 2, W side. 15'W of wall, 40'S of N
end of N wing wall
33 2 9/1/2006 Bent 2, W side, 10'W of wall, 25'N of S
end of S wing wall
3'< 2 9/5/2006 Abbut 1 and Bent 2 bf, 14'E of Wface
Bent 2, 60'S of N end of wing wall
35 2 9/6/2006 E face Bent 2, 1.5'E of face, 35" S of N
end of wing wall
36 2 9/7/2006 E face Benf 2, 1.5'E of face, 35'S of N
end of wing wall
37 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5, 10'E of E face, 10'N of S end
38 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5, 10'E of E face, 10'S of N end
39 1 9/7/2006 Bent 5, 10'E of E face, 30'N of S end
''O 1 9/8/2005 Bent 5, 25'E of E face, 15'Nof Send
41 1 9/8/2005 Bent 5,25'E of E face, 25'S of N end
-^2 2. 9/11/2006 Bent 2, 2'Wof Wface, 5'N of Send of
wing wali
Ele.
Moisture Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction Conform
Non-Conform Field Opt. Field Maximum Obtained Required
Conform
Non-Conform
31.5 11.1% 11:0% 114.1 123.5 92% 95% Nonconfonm
31.5 11.1% 11.0% 120,3 123.5 97% 95% Conform
33.5 12.4% 11.0% 116.2 123.5 94% 90% Conform
35.5 11.5% 11.0% 116.4 123.5 94% 90% Conform
35.5 12.4% 11.0% 116.9 123.5 95% 90% Conform
35.5 11.1% 11.0% 117.4 123.5 . 95% 90% Conform
37.5 11.9% 11.0% 115.1 123.5 93% 90% Conform
37.5 12.8% 11:0% 116.1 123.5 94% 90% Conform
39.5 11.1% 11.0,% 114.5 123.5 93% 90% Conform
39.5 12.4% 11.0% 115.1 123.5 93% 90% Conform
41.5 12.4% 11.0% 112.3 123.5 91% 90% Conform
28:0 11.5% 11.0% 118,3 123.5 96% 95% Conform
30.0 11.1% 11.0% 119.5 123.5 97% 95% Conform
32:5 13,6% 12.0% 104.8 113.5 92% 90% Conform •34.5 12.8% 12.0% 104.4 113.5. 92% 90% Conform 36,5 14.1% 12.0'% 103.3 113.5 91% 90% Conform 38.5 13.6% 12:0%. 105.5 113:5 93% 90% Conform
40.5 12.4% 12.0% 104.9 113.5 92% 90% Conform
35.5 11.9% 11.0% 118.1 123,5 96% 95% Conform
ContracI Number
Projecl Name:
Location:
TABLE 2
REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA
134834
Carlsbad Blvd. OH Bridge Retrofit
Carlsbad, California
Test
#
Sample Test
Date
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Test Location
9/11/2006 Bent 2, 2' W of W face, 5'N of S ehd of
wing wall
9/11 /2006 Bent 2,10' W of W face, 5'N of S end of
wing wall
9/11/2006 Bent 2, 5' E of abbutment, center wall
9/11 /2006 Bent 2, 1' N of W face, 15' S of N end of
wing wall
9/11 /2006 Bent 2, 1' W of W face, 5' N of S end of
wing wall
9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 5' S ofS end, .Bent 2 wing
wall
9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 10' N of S end, Bent 2
wing wall
9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 30' N of S end, Bent2
wing wall
9/12/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, center wall, Bent 2, 15' W
of west face
9/13/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 50' S of N end. Bent 2
wing wall
9/13/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 20' S of N end, Bent 2, 10'
E of E face
9/13/2006 W 1.5:1 slope, 15' S of N end. Bent 5. 10'
E of E face
9/13/2006 W 1:5:1 slope, 20' N of S end, Bent 5.10'
E of E face
Ele.
Moisture Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction Conform
Non-Confomi
Ele.
Field Opt. Field Maximum Obtained Required
Conform
Non-Confomi
37,5 12.4% 11.0% 119.0 123.5 96% 95% Conform
39.5 11.1% 11.0% 119.8 123.5 97% 90% Conform
41.5 11.5% 11,0% 118.2 •123.5 96% 90% Conform
FSG 11.1% 11.0% 120.3 123.5 97% 95% Conform
FSG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
11.9%
12.8%
n.9%
12.4%
11.9%
12.4%
11.9%
13:2%
12:8%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%.
11.0%
12.0%
12.0%
iiae
112,2
113.4
113.6
111.9
112.7
11,4,3
105.0
104.1
123:5
123.5
123.5
123:5
123.5
123.5
123.5
113.5
113.5
97%
91%
92%
92%
91%
9,1%
93%
93%,
92%
95%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Conform
Cpnforrri
Conform
Conform
Conform
Confonn
Conform
Conform