HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 10-12; SMERUD RESIDENCE; INTERIM REPORT OF GRADING; 2011-08-31CHRISTIAN WHEELER
ENG1NEEP1NG
August 31, 2011
Richard Smenud CWE 2100122.05
do Martin Volk -
568 Compass Road
Oceanside, California 92054
Subject: . Interim Report of Grading Observations and Testing Results, Proposed Buena Vista Way.
Residence, 1099 Buena Vista Way, Carlsbad, California.
References: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Buena Vista Way Residence, 1099 Buena
Vista Way, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Christian Wheeler Engineering, dated May 28,
2010 (CWE 2100122.01).
Ladies/ Gentlemen,
In accordance with your request, our proposal and agreement dated May 3, 2010, and the requirements of
Section 1704.7 of the California Building Code, Christian Wheeler Engineering has prepared this report to
summarize our observations of the grading operations at the subject site and to present the results of our field
and laboratory testing. The results of our field testing include in-place density tests performed in the fills
placed during the grading operations for the subject property. The observation and testing services addressed
by this report were coordinated by BTS Equipment and Strongside Builders. Our services were provided
during the period between June 20, 2011 and July 28, 2011.
INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject site is a nearly rectangular shaped parcel of land located at 1099 Buena
Vista Way, in the city of Carlsbad. The site is bounded on the south by Buena Vista Way, and is otherwise
surrounded by single family residential properties. The property is vacant at this time, but appears to once
have supported a single-family home and associated improvements. The relatively fiat lot is about 67 feet
wide and 150 feet deep. Topographically, the site slopes gently to the northeast, with elevations ranging from
3980 Home Avenue i San Diego, CA 92105 e 619-550-1700 w FAX 619-550-1701
CWE2100122.05 August 31, 2011 Page
about 741/2 feet mean sea level (MSL) at the southwestern corner to elevation 70 feet MSL at the northeastern
corner.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: The project consists of the construction of a single-family residential structure,
and an attached accessory dwelling unit. The residence will be a two-story, wood-frame structure with an on-
grade concrete floor slab; the accessory building will be a single-story structure with an on-grade concrete
floor slab. Both structures are to be supported by conventional shallow foundations. A retaining wall, less
than four feet in height, is to be located along the eastern property line.
PLAN REFERENCE: In order to assist in our understanding of the various elements of the project, our
firm was provided with grading and structural plans, approved and dated June 9, 2011. Plate No. 1 of this
report is a reproduction of the grading plan, modified to show the approximate locations of our field tests
and the relevant limits of the earthwork operations performed.
SCOPE OF SERVICE
Services provided by Christian Wheeler Engineering during the course of the earthwork included the
following elements.
Observing the earthwork operations as requested.
Providing field recommendations for elements of the earthwork not specifically addressed by the
referenced geotechnical report.
Recording the approximate elevations and limits of significant geotechnical elements.
Performing in-place density tests in the fills placed during grading operations.
Performing laboratory maximum density, optimum moisture content, and expansion index
determinations on the soils encountered in the earthwork.
Determining the relative compaction of the fills placed.
Preparing this report, summarizing our observations and test results
CONTRACTOR
GRADING: The grading earthwork addressed by this report was performed by BTS Equipment of El Cajon,
California. The primary equipment utilized by the contractor in the work consisted of the following:
CWE2100122.05 August 31, 2011 Page
1i John Deere700jDozer
1 Caterpillar Skid Steer
1 - - Water Hose
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
GENERAL: As scheduled by Strongside Builders, our field representatives observed the site preparation
and grading operations for the construction of the building pads which are to support the subject structures.
SITE PREPARATION: Site preparation began with clearing and grubbing on-site vegetation in preparation
for the grading operations.
GRADING: Topsoil and loose soils were excavated down to a depth where competent formational soils
were exposed. The removals extended approximately three feet in depth and extended approximately five feet
laterally outside any settlement sensitive improvements. Fill materials placed in the pads to support the
residence, dwelling, and associated improvements consisted of on-site silty sands and imported clayey sand.
These materials were typically thoroughly mixed and placed in relatively thin, uniform lifts, moisture-
conditioned as needed and compacted by means of a tracking in fills by means of a crawler dozer. As
recommended in the referenced report, fill materials were compacted to at least 90 percent of the materials.
maximum dry density.
FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING
FIELD TESTS: Field tests to measure the in-situ density and moisture content of the fills placed were
conducted in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D6938; "Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil
and Soil-Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods." The locations of the field tests were selected by our
technician in areas discerned to exhibit relative compaction that was generally representative of that attained
in the fill. Field density tests for grading operations were generally performed at a maximum interval of two
feet vertically. Elevations were estimated using simple hand instruments measured against existing
monuments, surveyor or contractor staking, the existing grade and/or elevations provided on the
construction plans. The results and approximate locations of the field tests are shown on the attached Plate
No. 1.
CWE2100122.05 August 31, 2011 Page 4
LABORATORY TESTS: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the soils
predominantly encountered in the earthwork were performed in our laboratory by ASTM Test Designation
D1557, "Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort." The tests
were conducted in accordance with the methodology prescribed for the grain-size distribution of the soils
tested. Representative samples of the soils present within the foundation zone of the proposed structures
were tested for their expansion potential in accordance with ASTM D4829, "Standard Test Method for
Expansion Index of Soils." The results of our laboratory testing are presented on the attached Plate No. 2.
CONCLUSIONS
GENERAL: It is the opinion of Christian Wheeler Engineering that the earthwork addressd by this report
has been performed in accordance with the referenced geotechnical report, the City of Carlsbad grading
requirement and the California Building Code. This opinion is basçd upon our observations of the earthwork
operations, the results of the density tests taken in the field, and the maximum density tests performed in our
laboratory. It is our further opinion that the building pads are suitable to support the subject residential
structures.
AS-BUILT GEOLOGY: The geologic units encountered during the earthwork operations were generally
consistent with those anticipated in our referenced report of geotechnical investigation. The earthwork
operations addressed by this report have, in our opinion, satisfactorily mitigated the potentially adverse
conditions described in the referenced report.
REMAINING EARTHWORK: As of the date of this report, additional earthwork remains to be done on
the subject site. The remaining earthwork includes the following: A 2:1 fill slope located at the southwestern
area of the subject property requires additional fills and further compactive efforts; an approximately four
foot high retaining wall is to be constructed and backfilled along the western property line; additional
removals are recommended for the western driveway and additional fills are required to achieve designed
grades at the eastern driveway. Additionally, subgrade preparations should be made prior to the placement of
concrete for on-grade floor slabs and driveways. All foundation excavations should be observed by a
representative of this office prior to the placement of forms or reinforcement in order to verify that the
footings have the proper dimensions and that the soil conditions are as anticipated. Our firm should be
contacted when these operations are performed so that we can verify their compliance with the applicable
specifications.
CWE2100122.05 August 3l,2011 Page
LIMITATIONS
The descriptions, conclusions and opinions presented in this report pertain only to the work performed on
the subject site during the period between June 20, 2011 and July 28, 2011. As limited by the scope of the
services that we agreed to perform, the conclusions and opinions presented herein are based upon our
observations of the work and the results of our laboratory and field tests. Our services were performed in
accordance with the currently accepted standard of practice in'the region in which the earthwork was
performed, and in such a manner as to provide a reasonable measure of the compliance of the described
work with applicable codes and specifications. With the submittal of this report, no warranty, express or
implied, is given or intended with respect to the services performed by our firm, and our performance of
those services should not be construed to relieve the grading contractor of his responsibility to perform his
work to the standards required by the applicable building codes and project specifications.
Christian Wheeler Engineering sincerely appreciates the opportunity to provide professional services on this
project. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact our
firm.
Respectfully submitted,
CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING
Jesse Bearfield, Staff Engineer
-~~ # at.
Charles H. Christian, R.G.E. #00215 Curtis R. Burdett, C.E.G. #1090
CHC/CRB:jdb
cc: (1) martyvollcgmai1.com 14.
IED
E25 No.1 lExp -30-11 ENGINEERING
OPEC
=S--p)— —
Alr,.1 LE
TUTTEST
- t
pa P Nj Dl. Li
0V.
BUENA VISTA WAY RESIDENCE
1099 BUENA VISTA WAY, CARLSBAD. CALIFORNLA
DATE: AUGUST2011 JOB NO.: 2100122.0
BY: CHC/IDB PLATE NO.:
RICHARD SMERUI) RESIDENCE
1099 BUENA OLSEN WAY
CARLSBAD. CA
I BY: CLAN K. VAN PENN
204 LX?. 3/31/IS DIV ENONEYR DALE
PRO&CT NO. DUNNING NO.
10-12 470-SN
H CHRETIAN WHEELER
ENGINEERING
CWE LEGEND
APPROXIMATE COMPACTION TEST LOCATION
[] ELEVATION AT EXCAVATION BOTTOM
OMITS OF GRADING 1595 B/S/A V94 /4Y S
QRf ARTIFICIAL FILL UNDERLAIN BY APN 155-25;-01 FF5 71.5 s: ,
PAD 71.0
Qop OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS / - I
I Iz vi
69.0 — s\ / jFFE74700
/
71.0 PORCH A
742 9
- lit
QUNIT A FS FFE 747
PAD TAO
-
- Ik r{ FFE74.7Qj'
PAD 74.11
7L0
UNIT B-.4
N-
QL t_J U H t9S— I I Qop / j CA000E Al ( Q!f [J GF742
JF 74.2
Qv
- ---- - - N 003342 0 15000'
,)
I Blii--AA WAY
Ex W."01 htUSS
FF575.0
o 1. PAD 745
SCALE: 1" = 20
SITE PLAN AND GEOTECHNICAL MAP
• } ;jr 194 I -
/ ( p P •
SUMMARY OF TESTS Project: Buena Vista Way Residence
MASS GRADING _
Relative Comnaction Tests ASTM D29-22--9-1-7
Test No. Date Location Elev.
(feet)
Soil Type Moisture
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Max.
Density
% Rel.
Comp.
1 6/21/2011 Southern Half of Residence 71.5 2 8.5 122.2 126.2 96.8
2 6/21/2011 Southern Half of Residence 71.5 2 11.0 120.7 126.2 95.6
3 6/21/2011 Southern Half of Residence 72.0 2 9.2 114.7 126.2 90.9
4 6/22/2011 Northern Half of Residence 72.0 2 12.6 121.2 126.2 96.0
5 6/22/2011 Northern Half of Residence .72.0 2 13.2 119.0 126.2 94.3
6 7/26/2011 Southern Half of Residence 72.5 5 11.0 115.0 126.2 91.1
7 7/26/2011 Southern Half of Residence 73.0 5 12.8 117.3 126.2 92.9
8 7/26/2011 Southern Half of Residence 74.0 3 7.2 121.7 130.3 93.4
9 7/27/2011 Northern Half of Residence (PG.) 74.0 3 6.9 120.2 130.3 92.2
10 7/27/2011 Northern Half of Residence (PG.) 74.0 3 10.0 115.0 130.3 88.3
11 7/27/2011 Southern Half of Residence (PG.) 74.0 3 7.2 119.8 130.3 91.9
12 7/27/2011 Southern Half of Residence (PG.) 74.0 3 5.6 116.5 130.3 89.4
13 7/28/2011 Retest #10 74.0 3 11.4 118.7 130.3 91.1
14 7/28/2011 Retest #12 74.0 3 8.0 124.7 130.3 95.7
15 7/28/2011 Garage Pad (PG.) 73.5 3 8.2 124.3 130.3 95.4
16 7/28/2011 Garage Pad (PG.) 73.5 3 9.9 124.8 130.3 95.8
MAXTMUM DRYDENSIT andOPTIMUMMOISTURE CONTENT ASTM :1557-91 1
Soil Type Description USCS Optimum Moisture Maximum Dry
Class (%) Density (pcf)
2 Grayish-Brown, SILTY SAND SM 9.3 126.2
3 Grayish-Brown, SILTY SAND SM 10.3 130.3
Light Gray, CLAYEY SAND Sc-90 1262 Import: _Moody's_(Oceanside,_California)
P\TANSTON JNrx ASTM D4829 1
Soil Type Description USCS
Class
RI Potential Expansion
4 Light Gray, CLAYEY SAND SC 31 Low
6 Grayish-Brown, SANDY CLAY SC 8 Very Low
CWE 2100122.05 Plate 2