HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 92-03; ARMY & NAVY ACEDEMY; REPORT OF GRADING OBSERVATION AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING; 1992-10-30pp q03
REPORT OF GRAONG OBSERVATION AND
FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Proposed Crean/Atkinson Hall
Northwest of Cypress Avenue and
Garfield Street
Carlsbad, California
JOB NO. 92-6190
30 October 1992
Prepared for:
Mrs. Mary Lipps
ARMY AND NAVY ACADEMY
ME1
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
30 October 1992
ARMY AND NAVY ACADEMY
P.O. Box 3000
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attn: Mrs. Mary Lipps
Job No. 92-6190
Subject: Report of Grading Observation and Field Density Testing
Proposed Crean/Atkinson Hall
Northwest of Cypress Avenue and Garfield Street
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mrs. Lipps:
In accordance with your request, Geotechnical Exploration, Inc.,
hereby submits the following report summarizing our work and test
results, as well as our conclusions and recommendations concerning the
subject project. A representative of our firm observed the recent
grading operation and tested the fill soils that were removed and
recompacted during the preparation of the building pads for the subject
buildings (see Plot Plan, Figure No. I).
The grading described herein consisted of removing and recompacting
on-site loose fills and undercutting to provide a layer of compacted fill
within the building envelopes. The grading was observed and/or tested
between October 22 and October 28, 1992.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work of our services included:
Observations during rough grading of the site.
Performing field density tests In the placed and compacted fill.
7420 TRADE STREET • SAN EIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 • (619) 549-7222 • FAX: (619) 549-1604
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 2
3. Performing laboratory tests on representative samples of the fill
material.
14 • Providing professional opinions, conclusions, and recommendations
regarding the observed grading and the pending work.
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
The building site, consisting of approximately 4,000 square feet, is
located at the northwest corner of Cypress Avenue and Garfield Street,
in the City of Carlsbad, California. The property is bordered on the
north and east by the Army and Navy Academy complex, on the south
by Cypress Avenue, and on the west by Ocean Street.
Prior to grading, the new building area sloped gently to the west, with
varying slopes on the west and east sides, with elevations ranging from
52 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 1414 feet above MSL. Mapped
survey information concerning actual elevations after grading was not
available at the time of this report preparation.
Existing structures on the site prior to grading included three
buildings and surrounding improvements which were demolished to
provide room for the new buildings. Existing vegetation prior to
grading consisted of lawn grass, shrubs, several large pine trees and
iceplant groundcover on the slopes.
The site has been prepared to receive the foundations and slab-on-
grade of two buildings, which will be a maximum of two stories in
height. It is our understanding that the buildings will be constructed
in conformance with the Uniform Building Code, utilizing conventional-
type foundations, footings, and building materials. A Plot Plan
illustrating the approximate location of all our tests taken throughout
the grading operation is enclosed as Figure No. I.
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 3
Work that remains to be completed at the site and that will require our
observations and/or testing include any retaining wall backfill, trench
backfill, and final subgrade and base preparation of areas to be paved.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Periodic tests and observations were provided by a representative of
Geotechnical Exploration. Inc. to check the grading contractor's
compliance with the drawings and job specifications. The presence of
our field representative at the site was to provide to the client a
continuing source of professional advice, 'opinions, and recommendations
based upon the field representative's observations of the contractor's
work, and did not include any superintending, supervision, or direction
of the actual work of the contractor or the contractor's workers. Our
visits were made on request of the contractor's representative (Mr.
Russ Beilby, Wermers Construction).
The grading operation was observed to be performed in the following
general manner:
Prior to placing any compacted fill, the areas to be graded were
cleared of surface trash, miscellaneous debris, and/or vegetation,
and temporarily stockpiled on the property.
Uncompacted fills, soft or disturbed materials, and/or unsuitable
soils were removed to expose competent ground. The removed
material in the building pad areas was extended to a depth of at
least 5 feet below finish grade and to at least 10 feet beyond the
perimeter building lines. Undercut was provided to create a
uniform layer of fill under the entire pad. In west fill areas, the
slope was rebuilt from elevation £40 MSL.
0
AM
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 4
The exposed ground surface was scarified at least 12 inches and
uniformly recomp acted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory
Maximum Dry Density, prior to placement of compacted soil.
Areas to receive compacted fill were, in general, observed and
evaluated by our field representative prior to placing compacted
fill.
Soils approved for use in the compacted fill were placed in hori-
zontal layers not exceeding approximately 10 inches •in loose
thickness.
Fill material was watered or dried at or near optimum moisture
content, and mixed prior to compaction.
The soils utilized in the grading operation were from on-site and
consisted primarily of silty sands.
Fill materials were tested and found to be compacted to at least 90
percent of Maximum Dry Density at the specific test, locations.
Compaction was achieved by drying or wetting the soil, mixing it
and rolling it with heavy construction equipment such as a Cat D6-
H dozer.
The method used to compact the slope fill surface consisted of
track-walking it with the D6 dozer.
Field density tests were taken at the approximate locations shown
on the plot plan (Figure No. I).
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 5
TESTS
Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556.
Maximum density determinations were performed in accordance with
ASTM D1557, Method A. The relative compaction results, as
summarized on Figure No. II, are the ratios of the field densities to the
laboratory Maximum Dry Densities, expressed as percentages.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon our
analysis of all data available from the testing of the soils compacted on
this site. Our observations of the grading 'operation (while in
progress), our field and laboratory testing of the typical bearing soils,
and our general knowledge and experience with the natural-ground soils
and recompacted fill soils on this site were utilized in conducting our
services.
A. General Grading
The soils utilized in the grading operation were from existing on-
site soils that were removed and recompacted, and imported
materials that were placed and recompacted. The soils' consisted
primarily of brown silty sands. Soils of this type are considered
non- to' low-expansive, per simple visual inspection.
During the grading operation, the natural-ground soils were
exposed (where necessary), undercut and properly prepared to
receive the 'fill soils. The fill soils were placed, watered,
compacted, and then tested, and were found to be compacted to at
least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density, in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad. The maximum depth of fill
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 6
soils placed on this site at the time of the grading operation
monitored by this firm was not in excess of 7 feet in vertical
thickness.
Any surplus, loose, stockpiled soils remaining at the property
should be removed and hauled off the site. The area of stockpile
observed during our last visit 'was on the location of one of the
demolished buildings (on the east-west direction).
Grading work that needs to be completed and performed under our
observations and testing include any retaining wall backfill, trench
backfill, and finish subgrade and base preparation in the areas to
receive pavement.
B • Foundations and Slabs On-Grade
The continuous foundations and spread footings shall extend a
minimum depth of 18 inches into the firm natural ground or
properly compacted fill, and have a minimum width of 12 inches.
The continuous foundations shall be reinforced with at least four
No. 4 steel bars; two bars shall be located near the top of the
foundations and two bars 3 inches from the bottom.
Concrete floor slabs shall be founded on at Jeast 3 inches of sand
overlying a 6-mil visqueen. The slabs shall be reinforced with at
least 6 x 6 - 6/6 steel welded-wire mesh or No. 3 steel bars placed
on 18-inch centers. Any steel, reinforcement should be placed in
the middle of the floor slab section. Proper supports should be
used to keep the steel reinforcement separated from the base or
soil subgrade.
It is recommended that all nonstructural concrete slabs (such as
patios, sidewalks, etc.), be founded on at least 2 inches of sand
on nonexpansive, properly prepared soils. Proper shrinkage joints
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 7
(sawcuts) should be provided and spaced no farther than 8 feet or
the width of the slab, whichever is less. The sawcuts should be
performed no later than 24 hours after pouring, or as soon as the
concrete is set. Sawcuts should be deepened to at least one-
quarter of the thickness of the slab. If steel reinforcement (such
as 6 x 6 - 6/6 welded-wire mesh) is provided for the slabs, the
control joints may be spaced up to 15 feet apart.
All concrete (flatwork) slabs or rigid improvements should be built
- on properly -,compacted and approved subgrade and/or base
material. Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will accept no liability for
damage to flatwork or rigid improvements built on untested or
unapproved subgrade or base material.
C. Foundation Design Parameters
The recommended allowable bearing value of the property
compacted fill soils placed on the site is 2,000 pounds per square
foot. The recommended allowable bearing value of the competent
natural ground is 2,000 pounds per square foot. This soil-bearing
value may be increased one-third for design loads that include
wind or seismic analysis. Additionally, these bearing values may
be utilized in the design of foundations and footings of the
proposed structures when founded a minimum of 12 inches, into the
firm natural ground or compacted fill for single-story structures,
18 inches for two-story structures. For on-site conditions, it is
expected that the maximum settlement will not exceed 1.0 inch, and
the maximum differential angular rotation will not exceed 1/300.
The passive earth pressure of the encountered natural-ground
soils and well-compacted fill soils (to be used for design of
building foundations and footings to resist the lateral forces) shall
be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 300 pounds per cubic
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 8
foot. This passive earth pressure shall only be considered valid
for design if the ground adjacent to the foundation structure is
essentially level for a distance of at least three times the total
depth of the foundation, the soil is properly compacted fill or
natural dense material, and the concrete is poured tight against
the walls of the excavation.
A Coefficient of Friction of 0.40 times the dead load may be used
to calculate the total friction force between the bearing soils and
the bottom of concrete wall foundations, or structure foundations,
or floor slabs.
D. Retaining Wall Design Parameters
The active earth pressure (to be utilized in design of cantilever
walls, etc.) shall be based on a Equivalent Fluid Weight of 38
pounds per cubic foot (for level backfill only and nonexpansive or
low-expansive, on-site native soils).
In the event that the cantilever retaining wall is surcharged by
sloping backfill, the design active earth pressure shall be based
on the appropriate Equivalent Fluid Weight presented in the
following table:
Height of Slope/Height of Wall*
Slope Ratio 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00(+)
2.0 to 1.0 L$Z$ 48 50 52
*To determine design active earth pressures for ratios inter-
mediate to those presented, interpolate between the stated values.
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 9
In the event that a retaining wall is to be designed for a
restrained condition, a uniform pressure equal to 8xH (eight times
the total height of retained soil, considered in pounds per square
foot) shall be considered as acting everywhere on the back of the
wall, in addition to the design Equivalent Fluid Weight.
The design pressures presented above are based on utilization of
an uncontrolled mixture of expansive or low-expansive soil native
to the site used in backfill operations. ' In the •event that
imported, clean, granular fill soils or approved, on-site, clean
sands are to be utilized as backfill material, this firm should be
contacted for possible reduction of design pressures -due to level
backfill, sloping backfill, or restrained wall conditions.
Additional surcharge •pressures to be considered in the wall design
include any loads applied within the failure block retained by the
wall.
E. Cut and Fill Slopes
Natural-ground cut slopes of maximum inclinations of 1.5 horizontal
to 1.0 vertical, and compacted fill slopes of maximum inclinations of
2.0 horizontal to 1.0 vertical, shall be stable and free from deep-
seated failures. for materials native to the site and utilized in
compacted fills.
Although the compacted fill soils have been verified to a relative
compaction of 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density or better, the
compacted fill soils that occur within 5 feet of the face of the fill
slope may posses poor lateral stability. If not properly founded,
the proposed structures and associated improvements (such as
walls, fences, patios, sidewalks, driveways, asphalt paving, etc.)
[1
CAR
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 10
that are located within 5 feet of the face of compacted fill slopes
could suffer differential movement as a result of the poor lateral
stability of these soils.
The foundations and footings of the proposed structures, fence
posts, walls, etc., when founded 5 feet and farther away from the
top of compacted fill slopes, may be of standard design in
conformance with the recommended soil value. If proposed
foundations and footings are located closer than 5 feet inside the
top of compacted fill slopes, they shall be deepened to at least .1.5
feet below a line beginning at a point 5 feet horizontally inside the
fill slopes, and projected outward and downward, parallel to the
face of the fill slopes (see Figure No. Ill).
It is recommended that all compacted fill slopes and natural cut
slopes be planted with an erosion-resistant plant, in conformance
with the requirements of the City of Carlsbad.
F. Drainage
Adequate measures shall be taken to properly finish-grade the site
after the structures and other improvements are in place.
Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties are to be
directed away from foundations, floor slabs, footings, and slopes,
onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly
designed and approved drainage facilities. Roof gutters and
downspouts should be installed on all structures, and the runoff
directed away from the foundations via closed drainage lines.
Proper subsurface and surface drainage will help minimize the
potential for waters to seek the level of the bearing soils under
the foundations, footings, and floor slabs. Failure to observe this
recommendation could result in uplift or undermining and
differential settlement of the structures or other improvements on 11
the site.
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 11
Proper subdrains shall be installed behind all retaining and
restrained retaining walls, in addition to proper waterproofing of
the back of the walls. The drainage of said subdrains shall be
directed to the designed drainage for the project or the natural
drainage for, the area.
It should be noted that changes of surface and subsurface
hydrologic conditions, plus irrigation of landscaping or significant
increases in rainfall over the "accepted average-annual" rainfall for
San Diego County for the past 10 years, may result in the
appearance of minor amounts of surface or near-surface water at
locations where none existed previously. . The damage from such
water is expected to be minor and cosmetic in nature, if corrected
immediately. Corrective action should be taken on a site-specific
basis if, and when, it becomes necessary.
Planter areas and planter boxes shall be sloped to drain away from
the foundations, footings, and floor slabs. Planter boxes shall be
constructed with a sealed bottom, and be provided a subsurface
drain installed in gravel, with the direction of subsurface and
surface flow away from the foundations, footings, and floor slabs,
to an'adequate drainage facility.
Any backfill soils placed adjacent to or close to foundations, in
utility trenches,. or behind retaining walls, that support structures
and other improvements (such as patios, 'sidewalks, driveways,
pavements, etc.), other than landscaping In level ground, shall be
compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density. It is
recommended that Geotechnical Exploration. Inc. observe and test
the backfill 'during placement.
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 12
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will accept no liability for damage to
structures that occurs as a result of improperly backfilled trenches
or walls, or as a result of fill soils pl?ced without our observations
and testing.
G. Miscellaneous Recommendations
Following placement of concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time
must be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings. Premature
placement of floor coverings may result in degration of adhesive
materials and loosening of the finish-floor materials.
Appurtenances and/or subsurface structures that are founded in
any potentially expansive clay soils shall be properly designed by
a structural engineer and/or soils engineer.
The remaining soil work to be completed at the site (such as any
trench or retaining wall backfill, and final subgrade preparation of
areas to receive improvement or pavement) should be performed
under .our observations and testing.
It is also recommended that all footing excavations be observed by
a representative of this firm prior to placing concrete, to verify
that footings are founded on satisfactory, soils for which the
recommendations expressed in the soil investigation report remain.
applicable.
SUMMARY
Based on our field testing and grading observation, it is our opinion
that the grading operation described herein, in general, was performed
in conformance with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. It is to
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 13
be understood that our test results and opinion of general acceptance
do not guarantee that every cubic yard of compacted fill has been
compacted to specification since not every cubic yard has been observed
or tested. Our test results indicate the measured compaction degree
obtained at the specific test location. We can only guarantee that our
tests and observations have been made in accordance with the care and
current professional standards in our field.
All observed or tested work done during the grading operation appears,
in general, to have been performed in accordance with the soil
investigation report for this site, issued by our firm and dated March
11, 1992 (Job No. 92-6190). The grading described herein was
observed and/or tested between October 22 and October 28, 1992.
All statements in the report are applicable only for the grading
operation observed by our firm, and are representative of the site at
the time of our final site visit before the report was prepared. The
firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall not be held responsible for
fill soils placed without our observations and testing at any other time,
or for subsequent changes to the site by others, which directly or
indirectly cause poor surface or subsurface drainage, water erosion,
and/or alteration of the strength of the compacted fill soils.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of the
buildings or improvements are planned, the conclusions and recommen-
dations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the
changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this report modified or
verified in writing. 0
Professional opinions presented herein have been made based on' our
tests, observations, and experience, and they have been made in
accordance with generally accepted current geotechnical engineering
principles and practices. This 'warranty is in lieu of all other
warranties, either expressed or intended. 0
Army and Navy Academy Job No. 92-6190
Carlsbad, California Page 14
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should any questions
arise concerning this report, you may contact the undersigned.
Reference to our Job No. 92-6190 will help to expedite a reply to your
inquiries.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
Jaime K.rros,RC.. 34422/G.E. 2007 W No. 002 07
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
cc: Addressee (2) 'FC'
Mr. Russ Beilby, Wermers Construction (2)
F]
VAN
SCALE: i = 30
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
STRUCTURE
lATE UMITS
RK AREA
22 FIELD DENSITY TEST
A13 LOCA1ON OF SLOPE
PROP)SED LOCATION OF WALL
P LOT PLAN
OCEAN STREET
NOTE: This Plot Plan is not to be used for legal REFERENCE: THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM AN purposes. Locations and dimensions are approxi— EXISTING GRADING PLAN BY DOUGLAS BENDER AND mate. Actual property dimensions and locations of utilities may be obtained from the Approved ASSOCIATES AND FROM ON—SITE FIELD RECONI\4JSSANCE
Building Plans or the "As—Built' Grading Plans. PERFORMED BY GE!. OCTOBER 1992
PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONS
ARMY/NAVY ACADEMY
Northeast Corner OCEAN STREET
and CYPRESS AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA.
FIGURE NUMBER I
JOB NUMBER 92-6190
Vic
Compaction Test Results
Test Date Location
Elevation
of
Fill
Moisture Field
Density
Soil
Type
Relative
Compaction
1 10/22/92 Bldg I east 43.0 8.4 110 pcf I 90%
2 10/22/92 Bldg I east 43.0 9.7 110 pcf I 90%
3 10/23/92 Bldg I east 45.0 10.5 111 pcf I 91%
4 10/23/92 Bldg I middle 43.0 13.0 116 pcf I 95%.
5 10/23/92 Bldg I middle 45.0 11.7 112 pcf I 92%
6 10/23/92 Bldg I middle 45.0 111 112 pcf I 92%
7 10/23/92 Bldg I west 41.0 10T7 113 pcf I 92%
8 10/23/92 Bldg I west 41.0 10.7 113 pcf I 92%
9 10/23/92 Bldg I west 43.0 13.7 117 pcf I 96%
10 . 10/23/92 Bldg I west 43.0 12.9 . 114 pcf I 94%
11 10/26/92 Bldg I west 45.0 9.1 111 pcf I 91%
12 10/26/92 Bldg I west 45.0 11.4 111 pcf I 91%
13 10/27/92 Bldg II south 43.0 12.1 119 pcf I 98%
14 10/27/92 Bldg II south 43.0 11.4 112 pf I 92%
15 10/28/92 Bldg II south 45.0 11.7 116 pcf I 95%
-16 10/28/92 Bldg II south 45.0 11.1 114 pcf I 94%
17 10/28192 Bldg II north 43.0 9.9 115 pcf I 94%
18 10/28/92 Bldg II north 43.0 9.9 115 pcf I 94%
19 . 10/28/92 Bldg II north 45.0 12.1 . 116 pcf I 95%
20 10/28/92 Bldg II north 45.0 10.1 116 pcf I 95%
21 10/28/92 Bldg Feast S.G. 13.5 111 pcf I 91%
22 10/28/92 Bldg I east S.G. 13.7 . 114 pcf I 94%
23 10/28/92 Bldg I middle S.G. 13.9 116 pcf I 95%
24 10/28/92 Bldg I middle S.G. 14.1 117 pcf I 96%
25 10/28/92 Bldg I west S.G. 11.7 116 pcf I 95%
26 10/28/92 Bldg I west S.G. 11.4 114 pcf I 94%
27 10/28/92 Bldg II south S.G. 11.3 115 pcf I 94%
28 10/28/92 Bldg II south S.G. 11.7 110 pcf I 90%
29 10/28/92 Bldg II north S.G. 12.9 116 pcf I 95%
30 10/28/92 Bldg II north S.G. 11.7 118 pcf I 97%
CONTINUED
Job No. 92-6190
Figure No. Ha CAN
Compaction Test Results
Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test I Date Location I Fill Density Tvoe I Compaction
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
TYPE DESCRIPTION OPTIMUM MOISTURE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
I Orange-brown, silty, fine to
medium sand. 11.0% 122 pcf
Job No. 92-6190
Figure No. llb
CIRO
n
FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS NEAR SLOPES
PROPOSED STFAXTURE
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB
SETBACK - 10
------ 5'
4 • I444
44qP
• •
.4. p • • 4 4 2 N .
S ••
44
REINFORCEMENT OF N
FOUNDATIONS AND FLOOR
444 4
. N e
SLABS FOLLOWING THE ,
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
ARCHITECT OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER •
• 44 4, , •4
CONCRETE FOUNDATION ., .
•
180 MINIMUM OR AS DEEP AS
QUID FOR LATEML
STABILITY
TOP OF COMPACTED FILL SLOPE
(Any loose soils on the slope surface
shall not be considered to provide
lateral or vertical strength for the
footing or for slope stability. Needed
depth of ieent shall be measured
from competent soil.)
COMPACTED FILL SLOPE WITH
NAXINIM INCLINATION AS
PER SOILS REPORT.
TOTAL DEPTH OF FOOTING MEASURED
FROM FINISH SOIL SUB-GRADE
COMPACTED FILl.
N
OUTER MOST FA1'- 5'
OF FOOTING
TYPICAL SECTION
(SHOWING PROPOSED FOUNDATION LOCATED WITHIN 5 FEET OF TOP OF SLOPE)
18' FOOTING/ 5' SETBACK
TOTAL DEPTH OF FOOTING
1.5:1.0 SLOPE
J
2.0:1.0 SLOPE
0 58' 48'
510 42
42' 36'
34• 306
41 260.24'
5' 18' W
S when applicable
FIGURE NUMBER lIE.
JOB NUMBER 92-6190
I I =rPHEN