HomeMy WebLinkAboutCMWD 99-101; Agua Hedionda Pump Station Containment Basin; Agua Hedionda Pump Station Containment Basin; 1994-12-20GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
A6UA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION
CONTAINMENT BASIN
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 20, 1994
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF VISTA/SANITATION
ATTN: MR. PETER NIEBLAS
P.O. BOX 1988
VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92085
JOB #94-246-E
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC.
2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102
Escondido, California 920294229
Phone (619) 743-1214
Fax (619) 739-0343
Job #94-246-E
December 20, 1994
City of Vista/Sanitation
Attn: Mr. Peter Nieblas
P.O. Box 1988
Vista, California 92085
Geotechnical Evaluation - Agua Hedionda Pump
Station Containment Basin, Carlsbad, California
Pursuant to your request, Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc. has
completed the attached evaluation of geotechnical conditions at the
above referenced site.
The following report summarizes the results of our field investi-
gation, including laboratory analyses and conclusions, and provides
recommendations for repairs of the concrete containment basin.
From a geotechnical engineering standpoint, it is our opinion that
the repairs of the indicated unfavorable geotechnical conditions
are feasible provided the recommendations presented in this report
are incorporated into the final repair plans and implemented during
the construction phase.
The conclusions and recommendations provided in this study are
consistent with the site geotechnical conditions and are intended
to aid in preparation of final repair plans and allow more accurate
estimates of the associated costs.
Thank you for choosing Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate
to call us. Reference to our Job #94-246-E will help to expedite
our response to your inquiries.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC.
Ralph M. Vinje
GE #863
RMV/kmh
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. SITE DESCRIPTION/DEVELOPMENT 2
III. FIELD INVESTIGATION 3
IV. FINDINGS 3
A. Earth Materials 3
B. Laboratory Testing/Results 4
1. Maximum Dry Density and
Optimum Moisture 4
2. In-Place Dry Density and -
Moisture Content 4
V. CONCLUSIONS 5
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS 6
VII. LIMITATIONS 9
ATTACHMENTS:
Plate
Site Plan 1
Test Trench Logs 2
Cross-Sections .... 3
Photograph 4
Reconstruction Map 5
Key and Benching Details 6&7
New Slab at Existing Slab Detail 8
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION
CONTAINMENT BASIN
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
I. INTRODUCTION
The property investigated in this work chiefly includes a graded
embankment for a sewage containment basin located near the south
margin of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon approximately as shown on the
vicinity map below.
VICINITY MAP
The containment structure is a graded cut/fill earth structure
provided with concrete paved interior surfaces. Numerous cracks
affect the concrete, and we understand that a previous overflow
condition resulted in erosion of ground surfaces along the north
perimeter of the basin.
The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate existing subsur-
face conditions at the site and determine their influence upon the
noted distress and possible impact upon the future performance of
the structure. The specific areas investigated are depicted on a
Site Plan attached to this report as Plate 1.
VINJE ff MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOIL TESTINQ PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 2
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
II. SITE DESCRIPTION/DEVELOPMENT
The containment structure is a graded basin which was developed in
1989 by cut/fill grading. The grading created lh:l (horizontal to
vertical) graded slopes on each of four sides of the structure
which reach a maximum vertical height of 23 feet within the
northern embankment. Subsequent paving of the interior surface
created the existing liner which is also provided with interior
drain pipes.
Interior concrete surfaces of the basin are affected by continuous
cracks. The cracks are chiefly longitudinal features which seem
to proliferate in the northern portion. The most notable feature
is a continuous crack which trends around the northwest portion
approximately parallel with the indicated cut/fill transition line
shown on Plate 1.
Outside the structure, ground surface areas of the northern embank-
ment are locally eroded. A paved brow ditch along the top of the
slope is locally undercut, and rip-rap shown around an overflow
pipe on Plate 1 is largely missing.
Original ground surface contours (shown on Plate 1) indicate that
the area prior to grading was characterized by a canyon which
drained southward into the nearby lagoon. Existing grades are the
result of cutting throughout the southeast portion and placing
generated soils as fill beneath the north and west perimeter. An
approximately cut/fill transition line is depicted on Plate 1.
Grading compaction records for the work were not available for
review.
VINJE 6? MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOILTESTINQ PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS "tjEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 3
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20, 1994
III. FIELD INVESTIGATION
Geotechnical conditions' in the area of the project basin were
determined from a review of the project grading plans (reproduced
on Plate 1) and physical inspections of the site conducted by the
undersigned. Subsurface conditions were determined by the
excavation of two test trenches excavated with a tractor-mounted
backhoe. The trenches were logged by our project engineer and
representative soil samples retained for laboratory testing. In
addition, in-place density tests of exposed fill soils were
recorded by field technicians under the supervision of the
engineer.
Trench locations are shown on Plate 1. Logs of the trenches are
attached with this report as Plate 2, and soil testing results are
summarized in a following section.
IV. FINDINGS
A. Earth Materials; The studied containment basin is a cut/fill
graded structure created by excavations into natural hillside
terrain and placing fill beneath the north and west perimeter
in order to create the existing embankments.
Natural earth materials beneath cut areas of the structure
include red-brown colored terrace deposit materials (chiefly
beneath the west perimeter fill) and light colored bedrock
units beneath the cut areas of the southeast portion.
Exposures of these materials were noted in graded outcrops
along the east and west margins of the project site. Both
terrace and bedrock units at the project site consist of
cemented, stable units which are expected to perform well
beneath the structure. Minor amounts of natural alluvial soil
may be present beneath the interior lowest areas of the basin.
VINJE <Sf MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOIL TESTINQ PERCTEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -_<JEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 4
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
Fill soils derived from the excavation of natural deposits at
the site underlie fi.ll areas of the project. The fill includes
fine sandy soils as indicated on the attached Plate 2. Field
observations indicate that the fill occurs in a relatively dry
and loose condition and is inclined over a graded surface in
Test Trench T-l. The indicated subsurface configuration of
site earth materials is depicted on cross-sections included
with this report as Plate 3.
B. Laboratory Testing/Results; Excavation of on-site earth
materials generated soils which have been grouped into the
following soil types:
Soil Type Description
1 brown silty fine sand with
sandstone fragments and AC chunks
2 red-brown silty sand
3 off-white fine to medium grained
sandstone
The following tests were conducted in support of this study:
1. Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content: The maxi-
mum dry density and optimum moisture content of Soil Types
1 and 2 were determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557-91.
The results are tabulated below.
Maximum Dry Optimum
Density Moisture
Location Soil Type fpcf) Content (%)
T-l @ 3' 1 124.4 12.4
T-2 @ 6' 2 126.0 ' 11.3
2. In-Place Dry Density and Moisture Content; In-place dry
density and moisture content of representative soil deposits
VINJE 6fMIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOIL TESTINQ PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -jfJEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN
PAGE 5
DECEMBER 20. 1994
beneath the site were determined from in-place sand cone
tests in accordance with ASTM D-1556-90. Results are pre-
sented below and on the attached trench logs.
Relative
CompactionSoil
Location Tvoe
T-l
T-l
T-l
T-2
T-2
T-2
@
@
@
@
@
@
3
6
9
2
6
9
1
1
2
1
2
2
Dry
Density
(pcf)
90.
90.
93.
87.
93.
93.
5
4
3
2
3
0
Moisture
Content m
8.4
8
8
6
6
5
.5
.2
.4
.8
.3
73
73
74
70
74
74
V. CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the foregoing investigation, the subject containment
structure is a graded cut/fill structure which is underlain by
stable bedrock and terrace deposit soils throughout the southeast
portion. Fill soils generated from original cut excavations under-
lie fill areas of the structure (see Plate 1). Test excavations
and laboratory test data indicate the following defects in the fill
soils at the site:
* Site fill occurs in a loose and uncompacted condition.
Moisture levels are well below optimum levels indicated
for site soils.
* Site fill in original hillside areas was not properly
keyed or benched into underlying natural units in
accordance with proper grading techniques. Inclined
fill/natural contacts were exposed in - Test Trench 1
(T-l) . This condition is indicated on Plate 2 and
depicted on the attached Plates 3 and 4.
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 6
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
Many of the noted cracks within the concrete shell are thought to
reflect normal concrete .shrinkage and stresses which relate to the
interior liner configurations; however, prominent features, parti-
cularly along the indicated cut/fill transition line, likely
reflect local fill movement relative to the more stable areas
beneath the cut areas. Based upon the condition of fill noted and
tested in the test trenches, additional ground movement at the site
can be expected in the future which will likely result in advanced
distress.
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon the indicated site geotechnical conditions, the most
cost effective method of controlling future basin distress and the
potential for major failure is to reconstruct the front (north)
fill portion of the basin structure. This should be accomplished
by regrading the structure as a properly compacted fill embankment
which is keyed and benched into stable underlying units in accor-
dance with current grading standards. The portion of the structure
recommended for regrading and slab reconstruction is depicted on
a Reconstruction Map attached to this report as Plate 5. Visual
observations indicated non-expansive sandy soil deposits at the
site. An expansion test may be required by the project geotechni-
cal engineer at finish grade levels to confirm slab recommenda-
tions. The following recommendations are presented:
A. Sawcut and remove surface concrete structures in areas shown on
Plate 5. Concrete debris may be crushed and reused in recom-
pacted fill. The debris should not exceed six to eight inches
in diameter and should be evenly dispersed 'throughout site fill
soils.
B. Remove fill soils to underlying bedrock/terrace deposit
materials throughout areas indicated on Plate 5. The removal
soils are suitable for reuse in properly recompacted^fill.
VINJE # MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOILTESTINQ PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 7
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
*
C. Moisture condition site soils to slightly higher than optimum
moisture levels and.mechanically recompact the fill in thin
horizontal layers to 95% of the laboratory maximum density.
•
Removal (bottom areas) should be inspected and approved by the
project geotechnical engineer prior to placing fill. Field
density tests should be taken in the recompacted fill in order
% to assist the contractor with moisture conditioning and compac-
tion procedures.
D. Due to previous soil loss resulted from overflow washouts and
• anticipated soil shrinkage at the time of recompaction, import
soils will be necessary to complete grading. The import soils
should consist of non-expansive, granular deposits. The soils
should be inspected, tested, and approved by the project
• geotechnical engineer prior to importing to the site. Existing
fill materials are expected to shrink nearly 20 to 25% on volume
basis when compacted to 95% of the maximum density.
^ E. New fill should be placed to create pre-remedial grading con-
figurations. All graded slopes should be compacted to 95% out
to the slope face. Slopes should be overbuilt and cut back to
the design configuration or backrolled at minimum three-foot
• vertical increments and "track-walked" at the completion of
grading. All slope constructions should be completed in general
accordance with the attached Key and Benching Details (Plates 6
and 7) and as directed in the field by the project geotechnical
• engineer.
F. The new slab for the containment basin should be a minimum of
four inches thick, reinforced with 6x6/10x10 welded wire mesh,
• placed mid-height in the slab. The new slab may be constructed
over the indicated 1^:1 embankment using "shotcreting" techni-
gues. The bottom slab however may be four inches thick, poured
VINJE <Sf MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
'9 SOIL TESTING PERCTEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 8
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
in-place concrete slab-on-grade. All concrete should develop
a minimum compressive strength of 3250 psi per Green Book
specification 560 C-3250.
G. It is customary to undercut the cut portions of transition pads
in order to mitigate adverse affect of cut/fill daylight line
of the overlaying improvements and structures. In this case,
however, the new slab at the existing slab should be constructed
in general accordance with the attached Plate 8 to mitigate this
condition. Periodic resealing of joints still may be necessary
and should be anticipated.
H. Original construction details also provided to us should be used
for reconstruction except where superseded in this report.
Construction joints around the perimeter should confirm to
detail A1/C2. Troweled three-quarter inches deep maximum
control joints should also be provided as specified in the plans
except the maximum spacing between control joints should be 12
feet.
I. The damaged rip-rap structure at the overflow pipe discharge
location and the concrete berm on top of slope should be
reconstructed as specified on the original plans or by the civil
engineer.
J. A number of utility pipes cross the project site at the proposed
repair areas. All pipes should be identified, removed, and
reinstalled as necessary. Pipes may remain in place if approved
by the project geotechnical engineer based upon the actual
exposures developed during grading operations. Added care will
be necessary in order not to damage any pipes or utility lines
during the earthworks.
VINJE # MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
* SOIL TESTINQ PERCTEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -jfJEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 9
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
K. Upon completion of grading works, the northern side of the slope
should be provided yith approved ground cover vegetation in
accordance with the Green Book or City of Carlsbad requirements.
Unprotected slopes will be subject to excessive erosion and are
not allowed.
L. All utility trench backfill should be compacted to 95% of the
maximum dry density.
M. Grading operations should be continuously inspected, tested, and
approved by the project geotechnical engineer. Testing of fill
will assist the contractor to achieve proper moisture and
compaction levels. Particular attention should be given to
removal operations and keyway construction.
N. All slab subgrade soils and steel reinforcement should be
tested, inspected, and approved by the project geotechnical
engineer.
0. A preconstruction meeting between representatives of this
office, the project planner, as well as the project civil
engineer, grading contractor, and city representative is
recommended to discuss grading and construction details.
VII. LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations provided herein have been based
on all available data obtained from our field investigation and
laboratory analyses, as well as our experience with the soils and
formational materials located in the general area. The materials
encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory
testing are believed representative of the total area; however,
earth materials may vary in characteristics between excavations.
VINJE 6f MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOILTESTINQ PERCTEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -§EOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PAGE 10
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN DECEMBER 20. 1994
Of necessity we must assume a certain degree of continuity between
exploratory excavations and/or natural exposures. It is necessary,
therefore, that all observations, conclusions, and recommendations
be verified during the grading operation. In the event discre-
pancies are noted, we should be contacted immediately so that an
inspection can be made and additional recommendations issued if
required.
The recommendations made in this report are applicable to the site
at the time this report was prepared. It is the responsibility of
the owner/developer to insure that these recommendations are
carried out in the field.
It is almost impossible to predict with certainty the future
performance of a property. The future behavior of the site is also
dependent on numerous unpredictable variables, such as earthquakes,
rainfall, and on-site drainage patterns.
The firm of VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. shall not be held
responsible for changes to the physical conditions of the property
such as addition of fill soils, added cut slopes, or changing
drainage patterns which occur without our inspection or control.
This report should be considered valid for a period of one year
and is subject to review by our firm following that time. If
significant modifications are made to your tentative development
plan, especially with respect to the height and location of cut
and fill slopes, this report must be presented to us for review
and possible revision.
Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc. warrants that this report has
been prepared within the limits prescribed by our client with the
usual thoroughness and competence of the engineering profession.
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOILTESTINQ PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -sSEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION CONTAINMENT BASIN
PAGE 11
DECEMBER 20. 1994
No other warranty or representation, either expressed or implied,
is included or intended.
Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact this office. Reference to our
Job #94-246-E will help to expedite our response to your inquiries.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, I
Ralph M. Vinje
GE #863
Dennis Middleton
CEG #980
Mehdi Shariat
RCE #46174
RMV/DM/kmh
Attachments: Plates 1-8
a:94-246-E.GE
CERTIRED
ENGINEERING
WWMA
VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (619) 739-0343
SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS -j@EOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
SITE PLAN
PLATE 1
Agua Hedionda
Pump Station, Carlsbad
LEGEND:
•/
V!
LOCATION OF TEST TRENCH
ORIGINAL SURFACE CONTOUR
,—@>—*
[ I EXISTING SURFACE CONTOUR
I /
• r| CROSS-SECTION LINE
I
Scale: 1"=20'
94-246-E
Site Plan is reproduced from project grading plan prepared by Wilson Engineering, 4-3-89.
Date December 13, 1994 Logged by DM
x _
Li. [^
°,:
0
_ —
- -
-5-
— . —
-
— —
— 1O —
15
LU
a.
CO
Vi
T
"V '
<
T-1
DESCRIPTION
FILL: Silty fine sand. Poorly mixed with pockets of pale
green sandstone fragments and AC chunks. Very loose,
slightly moist. SOIL TYPE 1
From 8', includes some rocks.
From 9', red-brown silty sand. SOIL TYPE 2
BEDROCK: (upper contact is inclined down slope)
Sandstone. Off-white color. Fine to medium grained.
Fractured and blocky on the upper exposures.
At 12' becomes more uniform, dense. Massive. SOIL TYPE 3
, . , 0 ,
LUcr
to o^
S.
8.4
8.5
8.2
DC W 0
Q Z Q-
Q
90.5
90.4
93.3
zU O
3gs?
(COO
73
73
74
Dote December 13, 1994 Logged by SMS
fp-LLJ "•
Q
— —
-
5
-
— —
-10-
—
-
-15-
LU_J
Q.5<
CO
T •
T •
T
s^^^^s^»
T-2
DESCRIPTION
FILL: Silty sand. Light brown. Includes sandstone
fragments. Loose, slightly moist. SOIL TYPE 1
Silty sand with occasional cobbles. Fine to medium
grained. Loose, dry.
At 9' becomes uniform and porous (may be natural topsoil) .
SOIL TYPE 2
ALLUVIUM (?): Silty sand. Red-brown. Porous.
Moderately firm, moist.
end trench at I/,' SOIL TYPE 2
LU
QLe-«co;s;b^
6.4
6.8
5.3
>->_t \LC co o;=; z Q.u UJ ^
0
87.2
93.3
93.0
z111 O -
P-s
idl-
(EOO
70
74
74
Vinje <§? Middleton
ENGINEERING, INC
TEST TRENCH LOGS
AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION
Project No. 94-246-E Plate 2
T Sand cone test • Bulk sample D Chunk sample Q Driven rings
ORIGINAL SURFACE
' Scale: 1 "=20'
i
20-
10-
CROSS-SECTIONS
PLATE 3
PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
BEST ORK
'/:.-.'- i; # •.ty'-'i-si'j^
it^t.. f/t 'ri*B:*SM:«
VIEW INSIDE TEST TRENCH T-1. NOTE LOOSE FILL SOIL ABOVE AND INCLINED FILL-NATURAL
CONTACT BELOW.
Plate 4
\JPROJECT AGUA HEDIONDA PUMP STATION - CARLSBAD DATE 12-13-94
RECONSTRUCTION
MAP
PLATE 5
Agua Hedionda
Pump Station, Carlsbad
RIP RAP-*;
LEGEND:
*r
J APPROX. AREA RECOMMENDED FOR
— ' REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION,
ACTUAL SAW-CUT LINE TO BE LOCATED
IN FIELD BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
Scale: 1"=20'
KEY AND BENCHING DETAILS (Typical - no scale)
finish slope finish pad.
existing ground
surface remove unsuitable
materials
equipment
width min.
15'minT
key width
cut slope
(to be excavated prior
to fill placement)
bench
competent bedrock or
firm native ground per-
project geotechnical
consultant
Fill-Over-Cut Slope
existing
ground
surface
finish pad
project 1:1 line
from toe of slope to
competent materials
remove unsuitable
materials
cut slope
(to be excavated prior
to fill placement)
bench per project
geotechnical engineer in
the field - also, see
geotechnical report
competent bedrock or firm
native ground per project
geotechnical consultant
key depth key width
Cut-Over-Fill Slope
Note: Key and benching details shown herein are subject to revision by the project
geotechnical engineer based upon actual site conditions. Back drains may
also be necessary as determined by the project geotechnical consultant.
Plate #6"
KEY AND BENCHING DETAILS (Typical - no scale)
project 1:1
line from top
of slope to
outside edge
of key
Insuitable V^|
materials/T^
existing
ground.
surface
one equipment
width min.
pad overexcavation and
recompaction per project
geotechnical engineer
15' min.
,mins key widthdepth J competent bedrock or fi
native ground per project
geotechnical engineer
irjt/
Side Hill Stability Fill Slope
finish slope
existing
ground
surface
one equipment
width minimum/as. \
/—"'bench
remove unsuitable
materials
2' min.
key depth
15' min."
key width
Fill Slope
competent bedrock or firm
native ground per project
geotechnical engineer
Note: Key and benching details shown herein are subject to revisions by
the project geotechnical engineer based upon actual site conditions,
Back drains may also be necessary as determined by the project
geotechnical consultant.
Plate # 7
oo
o
UJ
LU
Qcall
co
i-1
521XLU
CO
<_J
CO
LU
<
g
3S
ae
5°-
8m
•z.UJUJtrocc
01
^
<Qi uj
w>I!IS
1 S*
„°-o
1
1
I 11 11 eI si s i =j
^§5 8'
31 5-
iu