HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 01-16; CASA LAGUNA; UPDATE SOILS INVESTIGATION; 2002-08-07NORTH coariTY COMPACnON
ENGINEERING. INC.
August 7.2002
Project No. CE-6687
The Merit Group, Inc.
2171 EI Camino Real
Suite 202
Oceanside, CA 92054
Subject: Update Soils Investigation/Inspection
Proposed Condominium Development
670 Laguna Drive
Carlsbad, Califomia
Reference: "Geotechmcal Report" prepared by Agra Earth & Environmental dated
August 24,2000
Dear Mr. Buckmaster:
the purpose of updating the above referenced geotechmcal report.
•1
Per your request, we have inspected the subject site and performed a subsurface investigation for - N I
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation was performed on July 31,2002 and included an inspection of the site
and the excavation of two exploratory trenches, with a backhoe to depths of 9 feet Location of
test pits are shown on the attached Plate No. One, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan".
As excavation proceeded, representative bulk samples were collected. In place natural densities
and moisture contents were determined at different depths in the excavations and are included
on Plate No.'s Two and Three. Subsequent to obtaining soil samples, om: exploratory
excavations were backfilled.
SOIL CONDmONS
Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of old fill/plowed ground were found to be 4 feet .
and VA feet in depth in Test Pit No.'s One and Two, respectively. Underlying native soils were
stiff silty and sandy clays (colluvium) succeeded by medium dense silty-sandstones and clayey-
sandstones.
. .^-j\'": '^^ . ^ . :-\:^ --V^^-JV--''..H ivjj^i^'s
0.50X302002^ ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 (760) 430-1116 FAX (760) 741-6563
MORTHCOaiiTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING, INC.
Project No. CE-6687
Page 2
The upper mantle of fill soils were found to have an expansion index of 11 and are classified as
being "very low" in expansion potential. The underlying silty and sandy clays (colluvium) were
foimd to have an expansion index of 115 and are classified as being "very high" in expansion
potential.
Groimdwater was not encountered at the time of our investigation. However, groundwater
seepage was encountered in the geotechnical report by Agra at 15 feet to 18'A feet below the
existing ground surface. In our opinion, groundwater encountered at this depth will not cause
significant problems during and after grading.
Due to the depth of groundwater, soil cohesion characteristics and a relatively high density of
colluvium soils and formational soils underlying the site, it is our opinion that soil liquefaction
occurring at the site will be unlikely.
LABORATORY SOIL TESTING
All laboratory test were performed on typical soils in accordance with accepted test methods of
the American Society for Testing and Nfaterials (ASTM).
Tests conducted include:
' •^ H
A) . Optimum Moisture & Maximum Density (ASTM D-1557)
B) . Direct Shear (Remold) (ASTM D-3080)
C) . Sieve Analysis (ASTM D-421)
D) . Field Density & Moistiire (ASTM D-1556)
E) . Expansion Potential (FHA Standard)
Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate No.'s Two through Four entitied "Exploration
Log" and "Tabulation of Test Results".
CONCLUSIONS
Briefly, our updated investigation revealed that soil conditions at the site remain as presented in
the geotechmcal report by Agra. Therefore, we are updating their report It is our
understanding, that the post tetision slab and foundation alternative presented in the r^
Agra will be incorporated into the subject dweUing um'ts. Therefore, if a post tension foundation
system is utilized, lime treatment of soil during grading will not be required. All other
reconunendations presented in the report should be considered valid and be incorporated into the j
planning design, grading, and construction phase ofthe subjectproject
MORTH COCIMTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING. INC.
Project No. CE-6687
Page 3
We should be contacted to review the project foundation plans and grading plans upon their
completion to assure recommendations presented in the report by Agra Engineering were
properly incorporated into them. In addition, the soils engineer declaration and general notes on
the project grading plan should reference the report by Agra Engineering as well as this updated
report
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service
is sincerely appreciated.
Respectfully submitted.
North County
COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC.
f Ronald K. Adams
;Presfdent
,, ' -it*
DaieR-Regli^
Registered Civi'
Geotechnical Engini "14
RKA:paj
cc: (4) submitted
1 i
NORTH COCINTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING. INC.
EXPLORATION LEGEND
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSMCATION CHART
.son. DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES
I. COARSE GRAINED; More than
half of material is larger than
No. 200 sieve size.
GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS
More than half of coarse fraction
is larger than No. 4 sieve size, but
smaller than 3".
GRAVELS WITH FINES
(Appreciable amount of fines)
SANDS CLEAN SANDS
More than half of coarse fraction
is smaller than No. 4 sieve size.
SANDS WTTH FINES
! (appreciable amount of fines)
.1: n. FINE GRAINED: Morethan half
of material is jailer than No.200
sieve size.
SILTS AND CLAYS
Liquid Limit
less than SO
SILTS AND CLAYS
Liquid Limit
greater than SO
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
SM
SC
ML
CL
OL
MH
CH
OH
PT
Well graded gravels, gravel-sand
mixtures, littie or no fines.
Pooriy graded gravels, gravel sand
mixtures, littie or no fines.
Silty gravels, pooriy graded gravel-
sand-silt mixtures.
Clayey gravels, poorly graded
gravd-sand, clay mixtures.
WeU graded sarid, gravely sands,
littie or no fines.
Pooriy graded sands, gravely sands,
Uttie or no fines.
Silty sands, pooriy graded sand and
sih mixtures. ,
; Clayey sands, poorfy graded sand
;.andcl^imxtures. .'
Inorganic silts and very fine sands,
rock flour, sandy sih or clayey-
sih-sand mixtures with sUght
plasticity.
Inorganic days of low to medium
plastidty, gravdy days. lean days.
Organic silts and oiganic sihy days
of low plastidty.
Inorganic silts, micaceous or
diatomaceous find saaiy or silty
soils, dastic sihs.
Inorganic days of high plasticity,
fiit clays.
Organic days of medium to high
plastidty.
Peat and other highly organic soils.
us - Undisturbed, driven ring sanq)Ie or tube sample
CK - Undisturbed chunk sample
BG-Bulksample ^ ' .
V - Water level at time of excavation or as indicated
APPENDIX *A'
A
NORTH COUNTY COMPACHON ENGINEERING. INC.
SOIL TESTING & INSPECnON SERVICES
TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN
I
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
LAGUNA STREET
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
B-5
TD=2r NCCEI
TEST
PIT #2
TD»21.5'i
I
. B-3
TD=2r
4^ Tippraxlniate location
of Existing Residence
NCCEI
TEST
PIT it .[
TD=21'
TD=21'
LAGUNA DRIVE
=^ .•-. 1/ *
PROJECT NO. PLATE NO. ONE
NORTH COUNTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING. INC.
EXPLORATION LOG 1
PROJECT NAME: LAGUNA STREET. CARLSBAD DATE LOGGED: 07/31/02
ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE TEST PIT NO. ONE
Depth
(Feet)
Sample
Type
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Mdsture
Content
(%)
Passing
#200
Sieve
Sample
Depth
Soil
Classi-
fication
Description & Remarks
SM Red Brown, Humid, Loose Silty-Sand
1-(Old Fill)
(Remove and Recontpact)
2-BG 24.9 2' ^ow Expansion)
3-
4-4-
CL Grey Brown, Moist, Stiff Sand-Clay
5-• •
• (Furm Natwe - CoHuvium)
6-
7-
(Ifigh E}q}anaon)
6-
7-
SC Grey Yellow, Moist, Medium Dense
Clayey-Sandstone
(Fonnation)
8-8-
Bottom of Test Pit
* ''^ >'
"f.'l* 111
"-..'.j-j-J
PROJECT NO. CE-6687 PLATE NO. TWO
NORTH COCINTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING. INC.
EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT NAME: LAGUNA STREET, CARLSBAD DATE LOGGED: 07/31/02
ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE TESTPITNO._rWQ_
•-•p-^^-^s,
Depth
(Feet)
2-
t .^4-5—'
7-
8-
Sample
Type
Dry
Density
(pcf)
BG
: 105.4
Moisture
Content
(%)
19.6
Passing
#200
Sieve
70.1
Sample
Depth
3'
5'
Soil
Classi-
fication
SM
CL
SC
Description & Remarks
Grey Brown, Dry, Loose Silty-Sand
(Old Fill) (Remove and Recon^act)
^w Expansion)
Grey Brown, Wet, Stiff Sandy-Clay
(Fum Native - Colluvium)
(High Expansion)
Grey Yellow, Moist, Medium Dense
Clayey-Sandstone
(Formation)
Bottom of Test Pit
- i
PROJECT NO. rE-6687 PLATE NO.__JIHBEE
NORTH COCINTY
COMPACTION
ENGINEERING. INC.
TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS
OPTIMUM MOTSTITRH/MAXIMTJM DENSITY
son. DESCRIPTION
Red Brown Silty-Sand
Grey Brown Sand-Clay
TYPE MAX. DRY DENSITY
gg. CU, FT)
Pl@2' 126.3
P2@3' 118.0
EXPANSION POTENTIAL
SAMPLE NO. Pl (q). 2' P2(a).y
CONDITION . Remold 90% Remold 90%
INTTIAE MOISTURE (%) 9.5 13.5
AIRDRY MOISTURE (%) 3.1 9.1
FINAL MOISTURE (%) . . 16.6 32.2
DRY DENSITY (PCF) 113.7 106.2
LOAD (PSF) 150 150
SWELL (%) 1.1 15.0
EXPANSION INDEX 11 115
OPT. MOISTURE
(%DRYWT)
10.1
14.0
•:' il
SAMPLE NO-
DIRECT SHEAR
P1<g).2'
CONDITION Remold 90%
ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION 31
COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) 100
PROJECT NO. CE-6687
PLATE NO. FOUR