HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 04-06; PALOMAR POINTE; BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS REPORT; 1995-11-20S •
BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS REPORT
FOR THE PALOMAR POINTE PROPERTY
APN#212-120-33
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
MR. JIM HIEAfl'
604 14TH STREET
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266
Prepared by
RICK EISENBART
ASSOCIATE ECOLOGIST, ESA
RECON RECON NUMBER 2736B Regional Environmental Consultants
4241 Jutland Drwe. Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92117 (619) 270.5066 NOVEMBER 20, 1995
This document printed on recycled paper.
.• S
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Findings
Introduction
Survey Methods
Existing Conditions
Botany
Zoology
Sensitive Resources
Recommendations
References Cited
FIGURES
Project location on U.S.G.S. quadrangle
Vegetation and sensitive resources
TABLES
Plant Species Observed
Wildlife Species Observed
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
8
10
2
5
6
7
Summary of Findings
Sensitive resources detected on the subject property include coastal sage scrub habitat
occupied by coastal California gnatcatchers (a federally listed threatened species),
Blochman's dudleya (a federal Category 2 candidate plant species), and vernal pools.
Coastal sage scrub is a sensitive habitat, impacts to which will require compliance with
the federal Endangered Species Act's "4(d) rule" through the Multiple Habitat
Conservation Plan and Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan.
Vernal pools are sensitive habitats which are covered under the City of Carlsbad draft
HMP "no net loss" criteria. Successful creation of vernal pool habitat will be required by
the City if impacts to vernal pools on-site are unavoidable. Coordination with the
USACE and USFWS would also be necessary.
Blochman's dudleya does not have a significant federal or state status to normally
warrant mitigation. However, the location of this species on the Palomar Pointe property
is significant as it extends the currently known range of this species significantly to the
south. The California Coastal Commission has previously required development and
implementation of a mitigation plan for construction impacts to this species. It is likely
that such a plan will be required for any impacts to this species on this property.
Spring surveys would be necessary to accurately map the distribution of these and other
potentially occurring sensitive resources on-site.
The sensitive resources described in this report represent considerable constraints to
development of this property.
Introduction
This report describes the updated biological surveys of the Palomar Pointe project site
within the city of Carlsbad (Figure 1). Surveys were previously conducted by RECON in
June of 1988. At that time, the only sensitive resources identified were two plant
species: western dichondra (Dichondra occidentalis) and ashy spike-moss (Selaginella
cinerascens). In 1988, the coastal California gnatcatcher was considered a potential
occupant of the site, although it was not observed during RECON's surveys at that time.
RECON determined that impacts associated with the development of the site were not of
a magnitude requiring mitigation according to the biological significance thresholds in
use during 1988.
1
imtorosa
30
:
I
c I\Q
vt
K.
(7
(\ (
it
,
,/
_)-
:: '7 Aitypit
-
L : -
—
- _,—
it
Aft
PRO
1
)(
JECT LOCATIOJ
Aipoj /2 •&---
1
Afrifi
iwv 41 Y
,AQAO__ —i 1
N'tI \ _•\ , ( (i" ) . -
I I —I0 ç I
I_____ -
IgdIeI '
I / / Tat k
iL
o
-
et
' '
I
Map Source U S G S 7.5 minute topographic maps,
San Luis Rey and Encinitas quadrangles
FIGURE 1
Project Vicinity
RECØN
In September of 1995, RECON conducted updated biological surveys on the Palomar
Pointe property. These current surveys included directed surveys for the coastal
California gnatcatcher, habitat mapping, and efforts to identify any biological constraints
to development of the project site.
Survey Methods
Three directed coastal California gnatcatcher surveys were conducted by Rick Eisenbart
and Mark Dodero during September 1995. Surveyors also completed general wildlife
and botany surveys, including preparation of a vegetation map for the property. The
gnatcatcher surveys were conducted in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) protocols, which entail three directed surveys conducted at least seven
days apart. The entire property was covered on foot during each survey effort. Patches
of vegetation that were too thick to allow passage were surveyed from the edge of the
patch. Surveyors used binoculars to identify bird species and also identified species by
vocalizations or other signs, such as scat, tracks, carcasses, and den sites. Plant species
which could not be identified in the field were collected and brought to the RECON
office for positive identification. Vegetation mapping was accomplished using an aerial
photograph (flown February 1995) and topographic maps.
Limitations to the compilation of a comprehensive floral checklist were imposed by
seasonal factors, since most spring annual plants would have already bloomed and died
back. Migratory bird species which may occur on the property during spring and winter
would not, have been present during the surveys. Since surveys were performed during
the day, nocturnal animals would not have been observed directly.
Floral nomenclature follows Hickman (1993), while plant community classifications
follow the California Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) (Holland 1986). Zoological
nomenclature for birds is in accordance with the American Ornithologists' Union
Checklist (1983, 1989); for mammals, Jones et al. (1982); and for amphibians and
reptiles, Collins (1990). Assessments of the sensitivity of species and habitats are based
primarily on Tate (1986), Smith and Berg (1988), State of California (1992, 1993),
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1991), and Holland (1986).
Existing Conditions
A. Botany
Vegetation on-site appears to have changed little from the 1988 surveys. Three
vegetation communities are present: chamise chaparral, mixed chaparral, and Diegan
- 3
coastal sage scrub with inclusions of annual and perennial grassland (Figure 2). Chamise
chaparral is dominated by a single species, chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum). Mixed
chaparral is dominated by Nuttall's scrub oak (Quercus dumosa), lemonadeberry (Rhus
integrifolia), and chamise. The Diegan coastal sage scrub is composed of California
sagebrush (Artemisia californica), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), and
laurel sumac (Malosma laurina). Annual and perennial grasslands, which are scattered
throughout the site, are dominated by wildoat (Avena sp.) and purple needlegrass
(Nassella pulchra). A complete list of observed plant species is given on Table 1.
Zoology
Twenty-one wildlife species were detected or directly observed on-site (Table 2). These
species included the San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus bennettii), a
federal Category 2 candidate for listing, and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila
californica californica), a federally listed threatened species. Both of these species are
also California species of special concern (CSC).
Sensitive Resources
For purposes of this report, species will be considered to be sensitive if they are (1) listed
by state or federal agencies as threatened or endangered or are candidates or proposed for
such listing; (2) on Lists lB or 2 of the California Native Plant Society's• (CNPS)
Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (Smith and Berg 1988);
or (3) considered rare, endangered, or threatened by the NDDB (State of California
1992) or local conservation organizations or specialists. Noteworthy plant species are
considered to be those which are on Lists 3 and 4 of the CNPS Inventory. Sensitive
habitat types are those identified by the NDDB (Holland 1986). Assessments for the
potential occurrence of sensitive or noteworthy species are based upon known ranges and
habitat preferences for the species and species occurrence records from the NDDB.
Locations of sensitive biological resources are noted on Figure 2.
Coastal California gnatcatchers were observed during each of the three site visits,
utilizing the coastal sage scrub and crossing over a piece of chaparral habitat on the
southeastern edge of the property, adjacent to the Palomar Airport fence. A minimum of
three gnatcatchers were identified here, with a fourth suspected but unconfirmed. This
represents a single-family group with juveniles as yet undispersed. The habitat
throughout most of the property is coastal sage scrub intermixed with grasslands, and
these gnatcatchers could make use of all of this habitat type as they disperse to form new
territories, or shift the boundaries of existing territories from year to year.
- 4
1i
_
jeq 1, -
/ / \
-
N
J I
Pli :i \
.•' .
/ - ,,-;, •,. •
I
.::- - -. L -
, - I •• -
G
- v /
H.
pjv_
G Coastal California gnatcatcher /80 95 FEET 0
Chamise chaparral 177-1 Disturbed
Mixed chaparral d Dud1ea I'!oji,,iunwe h1ohiiian:ue
J San Diego black wiled jackrabbit FIG 2 J Coastal age scrub/orassland V Vernal pool (oeneral location)
Note:Selaginella cinerascenc was observed over Existing Vegetation and
- . a large portion of the property, and mapping -
was considered impractical Sensitive Species (Sept 1995)
TABLE 1
PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED
Scientific Name Common Name Origin
Adeno stoma fasciculatum Hook. & Am. Chamise N
Aremisia californica Less. California sagebrush N
Avena sp. Wild oats N
Baccharis emoryi A. Gray - Chaparral broom N
Baccharis pilularis DC. Coyote bush N
Baccharis sarothroides A. Gray Broom baccharis N
Chiorogalum parviflorum Wats. Amole, soap plant N
Cortaderiajubata (Lemoine) Stapf Pampas grass I
Dudleya blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran ssp. blochmaniae Blochman's dudleya N
Eleocharis macrostachya Britton Pale spikerush N
Eremocarpus setigerus (Hook.) Benth. Dove weed N
Eriogonumfasciculatum Benth. var. fasciculatum California buckwheat N
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Fennel I
Hemizoniafasciculata (DC.) Torrey & A. Gray Golden tarplant N
Heteromeles arbutfolia (Lindley) Roemer Toyon, Christmas berry N
isocoma menziesii (Hook. & Am.) G. Nesom Coast goldenbush N
Lessingiafilagin(folia (Hook. & Am.) M.A. Lane var.filagin(folia California-aster N
Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torrey & A. Gray) Ottley var. scoparius California broom N
Lythrum hyssopfolium L. Grass poly N
Malacothamnusfascicularus (Torrey & A. Gray) E. Greene Chaparral mallow N
Malosma laurina (Nutt.) Abrams Laurel sumac N
Mimulus sp. Monkeyflower N
Nassella sp. Needlegrass N
Navarretia hamara E. Greene Hooked navarretia N
Opuntia littoralis (Engeim.) Cockerell. Shore cactus N
Picris echioides L. Bristly ox-tongue I
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. Annual beard grass I
Psilocarphus brevissimus Nutt. var. brevissimus Dwarf woolly-heads N
Quercus dumosa Nutt. Nuttall's scrub oak N
Raphanus sativus L. Radish I
Rhus inregrifolia (Nutt.) Brewer & Watson Lemonadeberry N
Rumex crispus L. Curly dock I
Salsola tragus L. Russian thistle, tumbleweed I
Salvia mel4fera E. Greene Black sage N
Selaginella cinerascens Maxon Ashy spike-moss N Stephanomeria virgara (Benth.) ssp. virgata Slender stephanomeria N
N = native to locality; I = introduced species from outside locality.
TABLE 2
WILDLWE SPECIES OBSERVED/DETECTED ON THE SITE
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Reptiles
Western fence lizard
Birds
American kestrel
Killdeer
Greater roadrunner
Anna's hummingbird
Say's phoebe
Scrub jay
-Common raven
Bushtit
Bewick' s wren
Northern mockingbird
California thrasher
Wrentit
Coastal California gnatcatcher
Lesser goldfinch
California towhee
Western meadowlark
Sceloporus occidentalis
Falco sparverius
Charadrius vociferus vocferus
Geococcyx californianus
Calypte anna
Sayornis saya
Aphelocoma coerulescens obscura
Corvus corax clarionensis
Psaltriparus minimus minirnus
Thyromanes bewickii
Mimus polyglottos polyglottos
Toxostoma redivivum redivivum
Chamaea fasciata henshawi
Polioptila califomica californica
Carduelis psaltria hesperophilus
Pipilo crissalis
Sturnella neglecta
FF,CSC
Mammals
Coyote Canis latrans
California ground squirrel Sperinophilus beecheyi
Woodrat Neotoma spp.
California vole Microtus calfornicus sanctidiegi
San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit Lepus californicus bennettii C2,CSC
Cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus audubonii
Status
C2 = Category 2 candidate for federal listing
CSC = California Department of Fish and Game species of special concern
Fr = Listed as threatened by the federal government - - -'
In addition to the plant communities mentioned above, vernal pools are also present on-
site. In the 1988 survey, no plant species indicative of vernal pool habitat were observed
within depressions on-site. During the update survey, dwarf wooly-heads (Psilocarphus
brevissimus ssp. brevissinuis) was found in four pool locations. While dwarf wooly-
heads is not considered a sensitive species, it is a vernal pool indicator. Other plant
species which are indicative of vernal pools [pale spikerush (Eleocharis macrostachya)
and grass poly (Lythrum hyssopifolium)] were also found in the pool locations.
Vernal pools are classified as "waters of the U.S.," which are under the jurisdiction of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Mitigation for impacts to vernal pools would
be required by the USACE.
The presence of vernal pools raises the possibility of San Diego fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta sandiegoensis) and western spadefoot (Spea hammondii) on-site. The San
Diego fairy shrimp is federally proposed as an endangered species, and the western
spadefoot is a federal Category 2 candidate for listing and a CSC species. The USFWS
would need to be consulted due to the potential for occurrence of a federally proposed
species on-site. Surveys for these species would need to be conducted during the spring
months to confirm their presence on-site.
Three sensitive plant species were observed during the update survey and include
Blochman's dudleya (Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae), a federal Category 2
candidate for listing and a CNPS List lB species; Nuttall's scrub oak, a federal Category
2 candidate for listing and a List lB species; and ashy spike-moss, which is a CNPS List
4 species. List lB plants are species which meet the criteria for state listing; while List 4
species are plants of limited distribution, but they are not considered to be threatened at
this time. During the 1988 survey, western dichondra, a List 4 species, was observed on-
site. This plant was not seen during this update survey but would not be identifiable at
this time of year. There is every reason to suspect that western dichondra is still
occurring on-site. A spring survey will be necessary to identify and map this and other
potential sensitive plants, such as thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea fihifolia) and San
Diego goldenstar (Muilla clevelandii).
Recommendations
In March of 1993, the USFWS issued a final ruling listing the coastal California
gnatcatcher as a federally threatened species. This listing provides the gnatcatcher, and
its coastal sage scrub habitat, with the protections included within the federal Endangered
Species Act. In order to streamline the process of evaluating and permitting impacts to
coastal sage scrub habitat, a special 4(d) rule was enacted by the USFWS to allow local
jurisdictions permits to take federally listed species based on their ability to implement a
segment of a regional habitat management plan. The City of Carlsbad has taken part in
8
the regional Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) and has developed a draft City
of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP), which is consistent with the MHCP. Any
impacts to coastal sage scrub habitat or the coastal California gnatcatchers on-site would
require consultation with the USFWS and should be consistent with the draft HMP for
the City of Carlsbad. The draft HMP might not be finalized until the County completes
its MHCP, but in the meantime Carlsbad will use the draft HMP as a guide for evaluating
proposed projects and formulating mitigation.
The City of Carlsbad draft HMP defines boundaries for Preserve Planning Areas (PPAs)
and Linkage Planning Areas (LPAs). The HMP uses a "one-for-one" mitigation policy
for impacts to threshold habitats (coastal sage scrub, southern maritime chaparral, other
chaparral, native grassland, and any non-wetland habitat occupied by a listed species).
The following is a partial list of the HMP mitigation policy requirements:
Mitigate impacts from proposed land uses or activities that impact threshold habitats,
or non-wetland habitats occupied by a listed species, through conservation of that
same habitat type within a PPA or LPA at a one-to-one ratio;
Ensure that the proposed land use or activity provides, or does not preclude,
connectivity between and within PPM and LPAs;
Ensure that the proposed land use or activity does not result in any net loss of
wetlands, oak woodland, or sycamore alluvial woodland;
Ensure that the proposed land use or activity includes appropriate measures to avoid
and minimize impacts to conserved habitat, preserve linkages, and listed species;
Prepare environmental documentation of the project's impacts to habitats and species
and its compliance with HMP requirements, and
Comprehensively plan compliance with the applicable provisions of the HMP.
The HMP "no net loss" policy will require that any project plan either avoid the vernal
pools on-site or mitigate vernal pool impacts in a way that ensures no net loss in acreage
of this habitat type. Preservation of existing off-site vernal pools is not generally
acceptable as it does not meet the "no net loss" criteria. Creation of vernal pools, or
enlargement of existing vernal pools, would likely be required if impacts cannot be
avoided on-site (Woods, pers. com. 1995). The USACE will also require mitigation for
vernal pool impacts. Due to the potential for occurrence of Riverside fairy shrimp
(Streptocephalus woottoni), vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecra lynchi) (both are federally listed species), and San Diego fairy shrimp within the on-site vernal pools, a
conference with the USFWS will be required before any impacts to vernal pools take
place. The USACE will require a 404 permit for implementation of any on-site project
which impacts.vernal pools.
According to the City of Carlsbad draft lIMP and the Multiple Species Conservation
Program mapping (San Diego Association of Governments [SANDAG] 1993a), the
property has been ranked as having a "moderate" habitat value index. It also was rated as
"high" on California gnatcatcher habitat evaluation mapping (SANDAG 1994) and is
labeled as "high" value in the composite habitat models mapping (SANDAG 1993b).
The property is connected to off-site coastal sage scrub habitat across College Boulevard.
The only boundary to species movement between this off-site habitat area and the
Palomar Pointe property is College Boulevard, which may be subject to moderate
amounts of traffic during peak periods. It is possible that the coastal California
gnatcatchers observed on-site in 1995 could make use of this connection. Another
connection exists linking the property to a PPA across highly disturbed coastal sage scrub
habitat to the northwest of the property. The connectivity of the on-site coastal sage
scrub habitat to off-site areas of similar habitat and eventual connection to a PPA
increase the value of the on-site habitat for coastal California gnatcatchers.
The identification of Blochman's dudleya is considered significant because this species
has become rare in San Diego County and elsewhere in southern California due to
development. Within San Diego County, the species formerly ranged from Pacific Beach
to the Orange County line. Previous to this discovery, the only currently known
populations in San Diego County occurred on Camp Pendleton Marine Base. The
California Coastal Commission has required mitigation plans to be developed and
implemented for impacts to this species at another development site in southern
California. The extent of this population cannot be determined at this time of year
because the species is now dormant. The species was only detected from dried'flowers.
A March-April mapping effort to determine the species' distribution on the property
would be an essential component of any mitigation plan.
References Cited
American Ornithologists' Union
1983 • Check-list of North American Birds. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.
1989 Thirty-Seventh Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list
of North American Birds. Auk 106:532-538.
California, State of
1992 Special Animals. Natural *Diversity Data Base. Department of Fish and Game.
December.
10
S . . 1993 State and Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened. Animals of California.
The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. Revised February 1.
Collins, Joseph T.
1990 Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American
Amphibians and Reptiles. 3rd ed. Herpetological Circular No. 19. Society for
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Zoology, Miami
University, Oxford, Ohio.
Hickman, James C. (editor)
1993 The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of' California
Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Holland, Robert F.
1986 Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
Nongame-Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Game.
October.
Jones, J. K., D. C. Carter, H. H. Genoways, R. S. Hoffman, and D. W. Rice
1982 Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico. Occasional
Papers of the Museum, Texas Tech University 80:1-22.
San Diego, City of
1990 Resource Protection Ordinance Administrative Guidelines. Revised Draft
2/21/90.
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
1993a Habitat Value Index. GIS colored maps. August 7.
1993b Habitat Evaluation Models: Composite Model Results. GIS colored maps. '
August 10.
1994 California Gnatcatcher Habitat Evaluation map. April 13.
Smith, J. P., and K. Berg'
1988 Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. California Native
Plant Society Special Publication No. 1, 4th edition. Sacramento.
Tate, James, Jr.
1986 The Blue List for 1986. American Birds 40(2):227-236.
-S
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
1991 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Animal Candidate Review
for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species, Proposed Rule. 50 CFR 17.
Woods, Terry
1995 Personal communication with Rick Eisenbart, RECON. Planner, City of
Carlsbad.
- 12