HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 04-10A; POINSETTIA PLACE; PAVEMENT SECTION RECOMMENDATIONS; 2012-05-02Cf o9.Ok
GeoTek, Inc.
1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, CA 92081-8505
(760) 599.0509 Office (760) 599-0593 Fax www.geotekusa.com
May 2, 2012
Project Number 3389-SD3
Shea Homes Limited Partnership, San Diego
9990 Mesa Rim Road
San Diego, CA 92 121
Attention: Mr. Greg Ponce
Subject: Pavement Section Recommendations
Fairlead Avenue and Genoa Lane
Vitalia (PoinsettiaIProject
Carlsbad, California
- £—OCA')
Dear Mr. Ponce:
Presented herein are GeoTek, Inc.'s (Geolek's) recommendations related to asphaltic concrete
pavement sections for the subject street area. Recommendations are based on sampling and R-
value testing of near subgrade soils as described below and Traffic Indices (TI's) as indicated on
the Improvement Plans for the project.
Pavement Section Recommendations
GeoTek obtained four (4) near surface soil sample from the project site for R-value testing.
The soil sampling occurred during a field reconnaissance. R-value testing was performed by La
Belle-Marvin (R-value report enclosed). The R-value test results and areas which they may be
considered to represent, based on field observations, are indicated on Table I below. A traffic
index of 5.0 is used based on that indicated on the Improvement Plans and Table A in Chapter
I of the City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards. The Traffic Index value should be verified by
the design Civil Engineer and/or the City of Carlsbad.
R-value Test Results
Sample Location R-value Area Represented
Fairlead Avenue 43 Fairlead Avenue Station 10+00 to 14+00
Station 11+00
Fairlead Avenue 15 Fairlead Avenue Station 14+00 to 17+00
Station 14+50 Genoa Lane Station 10+00 to I 1+93
Fairlead Avenue 41 Fairlead Avenue Station 17+00 to 20+00
Station 17+00
Fairlead Avenue 45 Fairlead Avenue Station 20+00 to 23+00
Station 21 +00
GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MATERIALS
Pavement Section Recommendations May 2, 2012
Vitalia Project, Fairlead Avenue and Genoa Lane 3389-SD3
Carlsbad, California Page 2
For design purposes, an R-value of 41 was used to represent all streets in the project excluding
Fairlead Avenue Station 14+00 to 17+00 and Genoa Lane Station 10+00 to I 1+93 where a
value of IS was applied.
The following table presents pavement sections based on the results of the recent R-value
testing and Caltrans pavement design methodology for a 20 year design life Performance of the
pavement sections will ultimately be based largely on construction methods and traffic loading,
and subgrade performance.
MINIMUM RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Traffic Design Pavement Section Location Index R-Value AC/AB (in)
Fairlead Avenue Station
10+00 to 14+00 and 5.0 41 4/4
(see note below) 17+00 to 23+00
Fairlead Avenue Station 5.0 15 4/6 14+00 to 17+00
Genoa Lane 5.0 IS 4/6 Station 10+00 to 11+93
Note: The recommended pavement sections comply with Caltrans design methods and typical City
Standards per City of Carlsbad Supplemental Standard GS- 17. The Improvement Plans indicate
minimum 4" AC over 6" AB.
Pavement Construction
All pavement installation, including preparation and compaction of subgrade, compaction of
base material, placement and rolling of asphaltic concrete, should be done in accordance with
the City of Carlsbad specifications, and under the observation and testing of Geolek and a
jurisdictional inspector where required.
Aggregate base should consist of crushed rock with an R-value and gradation in accordance
with Class II Aggregate Base (Section .26 of the Standard Caltrans Specification) or Crushed
Aggregate Base (Section 200.0.0 of the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction).
Minimum compaction requirements for the upper 12 inches of subgrade should be 95 percent
and 95 percent for aggregate base, as per ASTM D 1557 (modified proctor).
Trash Enclosures
In accordance with City Standards, the level loading area in front of trash enclosures shall be
concrete with a minimum thickness of 7¼ inches per City of Carlsbad Supplemental Standard
GS- 16.
'G,
G EOT E K
Pavement Section Recommendations •: :• May 2, 2012:
: :Vitalia Project, Fairlead Avenue andGenoa Lane 3:3895D3
..:.Carlsbad, California. Page 3
Closure : •• ••
Our above findings/recommendations were prepared::in conformance with generally accepted
..profess ionial engineering practices and no further warranty is implied This report is subject to
review by the controlling authorities for this project. Geolék: accepts neither responsibility
nor liability for work, testing, or recommendations performed or provided by others
4 • •
If you should have any questions, or if Geolek can be of additional service, please do not • •
hesitate to contact the undersigned
Respectfully submitted,
No. 1142
Principal Geologist 'OFcAUO# • Senior Project Engineer
Enclosures: Cited References • : • -
• R-value Test Results •. • 0• • ••
Copies (I) Addressee via email
(I) Sarah Beckman Shea Homes via email
GEOTEK : •,
Pavement Section Recommendations May 2, 2012
Vitalia Project, Fairlead Avenue and Genoa Lane 3389-SD3
Carlsbad, California References
CITED REFERENCES
"Carlsbad Tract No. CT 04-10 (A), Poinsettia Lane, Improvement Plans" by Pangea Land
Consultants, Inc. approved by City 01/20/2012
City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards, latest revision 1/ 14/2011
Standard Specification for Public Works Construction, current edition
Standard Caltrans Specification, California Department of Transportation, 2010
CalFP version 1. I Computer Program by California Department of Transportation 2008 valid
through 2012.
GE 01£ K
ANALYSIS
DESIGN LaBelle • Abon'6111*11
PROFESSIONAL PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
SOILS, ASPHALT
TECHNOLOGY
April 11, 2012
Mr. William Deile
GeoTek Inc.
1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A
Vista, CA 92081-8505
Project No. 38082
Dear Mr. Deile:
Testing of the bulk soil samples delivered to our laboratory on 4/09/2012 has been
completed.
Reference: W.O. #3389-SD3, P.O. #1599
Client: Shea Homes
Project: Vitalia
Samples: R-1 Sta. 21+00
R-2 Sta. 17+00
R-3Sta. 14+50
R-4 Sta. 11+00
R-Value data sheets are attached for your use and file. Any untested portion of the sample
will be retained for a period of 60 days prior to disposal. The opportunity to be of service
is sincerely appreciated and should you have any questions, kindly call.
Respectfully Submitted,
0 SSZN
. .
.....................
Steven R. Marvin
RICE 30659
SRM:rw
2700 S. GRAND AVENUE o SANTA ANA, CA 92705-5404 o (714) 546-3468 a FAX (714) 546-5841
INFO@LABELLEMARVIN.COM
R-VALUE DATA SHEET
J.N. 3389-SD3
Shea Homes "Vitalia"
PROJECT NUMBER 38082 BORING NUMBER: R-1 Sta. 21+00
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:Brown Sandy Silt
Item
a
SPECIMEN
b c
Mold Number 1 2 3
Water added, grams 100 130 88
Initial Test Water, % 15.7 18.3 14.6
Compact Gage Pressure,psi 80 50 145
Exudation Pressure, psi 529 178 763
Height Sample, Inches 2.49 2.60 2.49
Gross Weight Mold, grams 3013 3024 3019
Tare Weight Mold, grams 1965 1969 1977
Sample Wet Weight, grams 1048 1055 1042
Expansion, Inches xl0exp-4 32 11 58
Stability 2,000 lbs (160psi) 24 I 49 26 I 60 22 / 45
Turns Displacement 5.26 6.62 5.21
R-Value Uncorrected 52 1 39 55
R-Value Corrected 52 42 55
Dry Density, pcf 110.3 103.9 110.7
DESIGN CALCULATION DATA
Traffic Index Assumed: 4.0 4.0 4.0
G.E. by Stability 0.49 0.59 0.46
G. E. by Expansion 1.07 0.37 1.93
45 EXamined & Checked: .i
Equilibrium R-Value by
EXPANSION
Gf = 1.25
0.0% Retained on the
REMARKS: 3/4" Sieve. * *
1r-vt'
OF CAft
/11/ 12
E 30659
The data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the
field. Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of
Transportation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301.
Lailelic • A%%nrvifl
100
90
z 0 or' U"
'V
z 60 0
50
40
R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION
PROJECT NO. 3fOe7- . 400
. j. -spa 350
BORING NO.'-t 94.. 2t-400 300 4c -i-v i3+ 00 LJ
DATE 200
TRAFFIC INDEXJ8SU..AJ.&. 4.. C) 100
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION 47
i R-VALUE BY EXPANSION 4-S C) C-)
MCI
IN
moommalmommmm,
iffum AMR IRS,
14•0 i(,.o
% MOISTURE "AT FABRICATION
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
IMMUNE mrmrm=i
OWN
ME
9 Nimm m— 9 0 m i I la I PAN -9
ri
s
RON no MEMBER
11101 m no
mool
__
I
r
c4j;:: liii±1
mmmmmm mm
mmmmomm LLa
BONN- lialEoMm
9m i i 'Wmi w 9 ul
k
Ow F,
2,0
1.0
________________ _____ - U -- - - 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 L4Y__0 LJ9
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION, Fr.. % MOISTURE
-
F
R-VALtJE vs. EXUD. PRES. T by EXUDATION
A EXUD. T vs. EXPAN. T • T by EXPANSION
REMARKS
flc1 -
LaBCNC •Alanin • • • •
PROFESSIONAL PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
R - VALUE DATA SHEET
J.N. 3389-SD3
Shea Homes "Vitalia"
PROJECT NUMBER 38082 BORING NUMBER: R-2 Sta. 17+00
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:Brown Sandy Silt
Item
a
SPECIMEN
b c
Mold Number
- 4 5 - 6
Water added, grams 72 46 31
Initial Test Water, % 17.5 15.1 13.7
Compact Gage Pressure,psi 40 85 135
Exudation Pressure, psi 205 430 799
Height Sample, Inches 2.60 2.45 2.37
Gross Weight Mold, grams 3079 3028 3014
Tare Weight Mold, grams 1977 1975 1976
Sample Wet Weight, grams 1102 1053 1038
Expansion, Inches x 10exp-4 0 33 62
Stability 2,000 lbs (160psi) 46 I 112 27 / 57 26 I 51
Turns Displacement 4.39 4.34 3.90
R-Value Uncorrected 20 51 58
R-Value Corrected 21 51 55
Dry Density, pcf 109.3 113.2 116.8
DESIGN CALCULATION DATA
Traffic Index Assumed:] 4.0 4.0 4.0
G.E. by Stability 0.81 0.50 0.46
G. E. by Expansion J 0.00 1.10 2.07
Equilibrium R-Value
41
by
Examined & Checked: 4
~,4\ZE
3/4" Sieve.
/11/ 12
REMARKS:
Gf 1.25
0.0% Retained_on_the
Eied
...
30659
ata above is based upon processing and testing samp received from the
Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of
portation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301.
I4nfldIc 9 ANflifl
loo
90
z
80
70
60
50
40
I
30
20
10
F
R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION
PROJECT NO. . 400
q 350
BORING NO. -2. ri#oo 300
re.s S-lea '4o-"
DATE 4/u/t?_ 200
TRAFFIC INDEX- A.LA.. .4 • C) 100
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION -
A
j o
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION S
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
im llllll lifflum
Nil
umolmWmEm Imiffii
EHRMHOM ~mmiffl
i
mm
III.
% MOISTURE AT FABRICATION
an Imil IN NIN EMER E mull
19mom1promm HE
M poll
P.
9WINS—Mmul 90
9=grR--&;:N:m Room No NOON RMIEPT
11
0
Emm SEEM lRommommi
mg Im
kl11I'U'
;1rnI;u!I man
fflHil1fl
Ull1llll
__
I mom
FEMME wi 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 c7c
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION, Fr. Z MOISTURE
R-VALUE vs. EXUD. PRES. N T by EXUDATION
A EXUD. T vs. EXI'AN. I A A A T by EXPANSION
REMARKS
0
L;ie!Ie •
PROFESSIONAL PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
R - VALUE DATA SHEET
J.N. 3389-SD3
Shea Homes "Vitalia"
PROJECT NUMBER 38082 BORING NUMBER: R-3 Sta. 14+50
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown Sandy Silt
Item
a
SPECIMEN
b c
Mold Number 7 8 9
Water added, grams 80 46 58
Initial Test Water, % 21.6 18.3 19.5
Compact Gage Pressure,psi 45 120 80
Exudation Pressure, psi 206 689 403
Height Sample, Inches 2.62 2.48 2.57
Gross Weight Mold, grams 3044 3019 2871
Tare Weight Mold, grams 1968 1964 1789
Sample Wet Weight, grams 1076 1055 1082
Expansion, Inches xl0exp-4 30 81 67
Stability 2,000 lbs (160psi) 45 I 114 31 / 73 34 / 83
Turns Displacement 4.34 3.67 3.92
R-Value Uncorrected 19 45 37
R-Value Corrected 20 45 39
Dry Density, pcf 102.4 108.9 106.8
DESIGN CALCULATION DATA
Traffic Index Assumed: 4.0 4.0 4.0
G.E. by Stability 0.82 0.56 0.62
G. E. by Expansion 1.00 2.70 2.23
15 Examined & Check 4 /11/ 12
Equilibrium R-Value by
EXPANSION
CO
(D CSP rn Gf = 1.25 LL ';O659
0.0% Retained on the
REMARKS: 3/4" Sieve.
Ste n J30659
The data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the
field. Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of
Transportation, State of California, Materials & Research Test Method No. 301.
L;rllelle 9 Aiirvun
NEW -
2o.
% MOISTURE AT FABRICATION
R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION
PROJECT NO. . 400
j3'-S1 350
BORING NO. . -3 4-4 -o 300
X-0 - 1-74..
DATE 200
TRAFFIC INDEX )_L4._4. i 00
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION 2-.-
CL
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION CD
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
go
MAIN
t-gig-2gaggo awl
kffiom ME Sm IN ONE
5 .... . -
ir TI
E1T; L1j','
:Wk11,
I
Hh1Ull
ML
1.0.
1.0 2.0 3.0 6.0
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION, yr. % MOISTURE
S
R-VALUE vs. EXUD. PRES. N T by EXUDATION . S
S
A A EXUD. T vs. EXPAN. T A A T by EXPANSION
S
REMARKS S
S.. 6i.zc-
S L;iflellc • Arvii -
PROFESSIONAL PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
100
90
z
80
::
50
1-4
20
4.0
3.0
2,0
R - VALUE DATA SHEET
J.N. 3389-SD3
Shea Homes "Vitalia"
PROJECT NUMBER 38082 BORING NUMBER: R-4 Sta. 11+00
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown Sandy Silt
Item
a
SPECIMEN
b c
Mold Number 10 - 11 12
Water added, grams 90 117 75
Initial Test Water, % 16.6 19.1 15.3
Compact Gage Pressure,psi 65 40 110
Exudation Pressure, psi 318 159 536
Height Sample, Inches 2.52 2.62 2.46
Gross Weight Mold, grams 3026 3048 3020
Tare Weight Mold, grams 1959 1965 1963
Sample Wet Weight, grams 1067 1083 1057
Expansion, Inches x 10exp-4 22 0 45
Stability 2,000 lbs (160psi) 27 I 61 36 I 91 24 I 50
Turns Displacement 4.95 5.83 4.55
R-Value Uncorrected . 45 25 55
R-Value Corrected 45 27 55
Dry Density, pcf 110.0 105.2 112.9
DESIGN CALCULATIONDATA
Traffic Index Assumed: 4.0 4.0 4.0
G.E.byStability 0.56 0.75 - 0.46
G. E. by Expansion 0.73 0.00 1.50
Equilibrium R-ValueGf
43
by
Examined & Checked: 4 /11/ 12
LU Cr
.-
659
REMARKS:
_1.2:XPSION
0.0% Retained _on_the
3/4" Sieve. .
_______________________________
The data above is based upon processing and testing samples as received from the
field. Test procedures in accordance with latest revisions to Department of
Transportation,StateofCalifornia,Materials&ResearchTestMethodNo.301.
Lalkile • Marvn
100
90
z 0 an 'J'J
'U
z 60
Cl)
50 CIA
4.0
-I
3.0
0
2
2.0
R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION
t •-•, "''s PROJECT NO. (ju
'.&3. 33$c_ S•D3 350
BORING NO.IR S4cA. L-4-o -J
300
ZQS.S. t4D4uO-
DATE 4/u 200
TRAFFIC INDEX A~4-C 100
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION 44
fflhIb mHomma —Big HhIll
R-VALUE BY EANS ION
% MOISTURE AT FABRICATION
800 700 600' 500 400 300 200 100 • - *
10
0 *
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION, Fr.
ffiolloo lam Z-imolom
271-glummmillo q- q. Q z R ** OR,
9 i i ri ON al I I I j Nuni
momw
41••
IL1iLW1J1 _______________ '1'i"U
SEEN]@ %111MME
im
allplall- Boom
ME -=a , ~_k_Affimffffi 8~~E
£10
Z MOISTURE •
* •
R-VALUE vs. EXUD. pi.cs. T by EXUDATION
___EXUD. T vs. EXPAN. T A T by EXPANSION
REMARKS
zc
l4;kOc • AWVfl
PROFESSIONAL PAVEMENT ENGINEERING