HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 72-01; Buena Woods; Final Report of Eng Observation; 1974-01-16- .
WOODWARD - GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES ,” ’ ‘*’
CONSULTING SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
An affiliate of Woodward - Clyde Consultants c ,- L_ ;’ [ 7 i ‘, : .
3467 Kurtz Street
Kamar Construction Company, Inc.
325 Elm Street, P.O. Box 1155 Carlsbad, California 92008 RECEIVED
- Attention: Mr. J. Rombotis JAN 2 1 1974
c\~y OF CARLSBAD ;;;;;-;;;;;TA;; ;;;;;PW;;;;GTESTING C-J- ‘ta-1 Building Department
+BUENA WOODS UNIT NO. 2 - LOTS 1 THROUGH 63
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
-
-
In accordance with your request, and our agreement dated October 2, 1973,
we have provided soil engineering services in conjunction with the grading
of the subject site. These services included:
(1) Periodic engineering observation of the grading operation.
- (2) Observation of the disposal of trees, stumps and other perishable
materials from the site prior to placing.fill.
- -(3) Observation of the removal of loose alluvial soils where encountered.
- (4) Taking field density tests in the fill placed and compacted.
(5) Performing laboratory tests on representative samples of 'thi? material
used for fill.
-
Site preparation, compaction and testing were done between August 13 and
November 6, 1973, in accordance with the "Specifications for Controlled
Fill" in our report entitled "Review of Existing Soil Investigation Report f-
-9 . \ ! 4 ,
J -’ wt- -2. * 1’ a@+.-- ’ ‘I ! tk p, “. ‘y/f * * If ’ r i.
/ * -y# a-
(,
-
SlOlO
.5.59
Kamar Construction Company, Inc.
Project No. 72-105-56
January 16, 1974
-
-
Additional Recommendations and Earthwork Specifications, Buena Woods Unit No. 2,
Carlsbad, California," dated January 8, 1973.
Fill was placed, compacted and tested on Lots 1 through 6, 10 through 20,
25 through 28, 30, 31, 32, 35 through 39, 49 through 52, 61, 62 and 63. Portions of Lots 61 and 62, which are large irregular open space lots, were left
in their natural state. Also. left in their natural state, were portions of
Lots 25 through 48 and Lots 50 through 52.
As the site grading progressed, the compaction‘procedures were observed, and
field density tests were made to determine the relative compaction of the fill
in place. Field observations and field density tests results indicate that
the fill has been compacted to 90% or more of maximum laboratory density.
The approximate locations of field density test and the limits of compacted
fill have been recorded on a copy of the grading plan for reference. The
results of field density tests and of relative compaction, expressed as a
percent of maximum laboratory density, are given on the attached forms.
Laboratory tests to determine moisture-density relationships, maximum dry
density, optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, plasticity
characteristics, and strength and swell characteristics were performed on
representative samples of the material used for fill. The results of labora- tory tests are given on the attached forms. -
Laboratory tests and a visual inspection indicate that nonexpansive fill was placed within 2 feet of rough grade on all fill lots noted herein.
A visual inspection of Cut Lots 7, 8, 9, 21 through 24,,29, 33, 34, 40 through 48'
and 53 through 60 at completion of grading indicates that potentially expansive
soil is not evident at rough grade surface.
Foundations for single or two-story structures placed on nonexpansive undis-
turbed soil or nonexpansive properly compacted fill may be designed for a
bearing pressure of 2,000 psf at a depth of 12 inches below compacted fill or undisturbed cut lot grade. Footings should have a minimum width of
12 inches. These pressures may be increased by one-third for loads that include
wind or seismic forces. .
-
-
Structures that will not tolerate differential settlements (such as foundations, swimming pools, concrete decks, walls, etc.) should not be located within 5 feet
of the top of a slope. Footings located closer than 5 feet from the top of a
slope should be extended in depth until the outer bottom edge of the footing is 5 feet horizontally from the outside face of the slope.
The e7evations of compaction tests, shown as finished grade (FG) tests, corres-
pond to the elevations shown on the grading plans for "Carlsbad Tract No. 72-11"
with the latest revision dated October 12, 1973, prepared by Roy L. Klema,
Engineers Inc., Escondido, California. Elevations and locations shown in this
report are based on field surveys established by others.
-
Kamar Construction Company, Inc.
Project No. 72-105-56
January 16, 1974
Page 3
This report covers the fill placed under our observation during the dates
specified herein. Additional fill placed after these dates, as well as
the backfill in utility trenchs located within 5 feet of a building and
greater than 12 inches deep, or any trench 5 feet or more from a building and in excess of 5 feet in depth, should be compacted under the observation
of this office and tested to assure compliance with the earthwork specific-
ations for the project. This office should be contacted at least 24 hours prior to backfilling operations. Utility service trenches within 5 feet
of a building that are perpendicular to the building footings and are less
than 12 inches wide and less than 3 feet deep are not subject to this recom- mendations.
-
_-
The inspections and tests of corrpaction made during the period of our ser-
vices on the subject site were in accordance with the local acceptable standards for this period. The conclusions or opinions drawn from the
tests and site inspections apply only to our work with respect to grading
and represent conditions at the date of our final inspection.
-
We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the
site by others or by uncontrolled action of water or by failure of others to properly repair damages caused by uncontrolled action of water.
- WOODWARD-GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES
LJL/JLH/RPW/EHP/we .
Attachments
(6)
WOODWARD - GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES comul.TlWO SotL AN0 ,ouNoAnoN Lf4al”rcM A110 aEoLoalsTI
-
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
-
Jo8 NAME BUENA WOODS UNIT #2 DATE REPORTEO l/16/74
JOB NUMBER 72-105-56 -
DATES COVERED September 4 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 1 Or 2
DAn n*t Rl!.YcsY YOI*NRS IILLD LOCATION LABORATORY ELLVATION RKLAYIVL
NUYWZR QC CONTKNY DCNBITY DLNaITY or TEST COYCACTION % DR1 WY. MI MI % or UB. OcN8.
.
-4 SEPT. 1 LOT 1 SEWER EASEMENT
AREA 2 LOT 1 -
5 SEPT. 3 LOT 1 SEWER EASEMENT
AREA
3 SEPT.
z
LOT 1 122' 11.1 120.5 129.5 93.1 LOT 2 125' 10.5 119.9 129.5 92.5 - 6 LOT 1 128' 11.7 117.7 125.0 94.1
'4 SEPT.
; LOT 2 LOT 1 - 9 LOT 2
20 SEPT. 10 -
:-;
LOT 16 162' 11.1 121.8
LOT 18 169' 10.5 120.8
LOT 17 166' 13.0 118.7
21 SEPT. 13 LOT 3 14 LOT 1 15 LOT 4 '
L-4 SEPT. 16 LOT 10 138' 11.1 122.3 17 LOT 13 147' . 11.1 124.6
^6 SEPT. 18 LOT 11 -140' 10.5 113.8 125.0 91.0
19 LOT 12 142' 11.1 120.2 129.5 92.8
27 SEPT. 20 LOT 10 140' 11.7 121.1 . 129.5 93.5
21 LOT 14 . 150' 13.0 117.9 129.5 90.9
_28 SEPT. 22
1 OCT. 23
- f i!
LOT 12
:i
15
10 OCT. - 5; i;' 153' 14.9 115.8 125.0 92.5 146' 11.1 119.0 129.5 91.8 28
2 148' 12.3 116.9 125.0 93.5 29 196' 13.0 117.6 125.0 94.1
1161 11.1 112.2 122.0 92.1 114' 12.3 112.3 122.0 92.4
118' 11.1 120.0 125.0 95.9
130' 12.3 115.1 125.0 92.0
133' 13.0 117.3 125.0 93.9
136' 12.3 116.1 125.0 92.8
94.0
93.2
91.5
142' 140'
142'
12.3 117.0
11.7 115.2 10.5 117.8
25.0 93.5
25.0 92.2
25.0 94.1
:
29.5 94.5 29.5 96.2
141' 12.3 116.3 125.0 93.1
143' 11.7 117.3 125.0 93.9 149' 12.3 113.1 125.0 90.5 158' 13.0 113.8 125.0 91.0
WOODWARD - GIZIENSKI 6 ASSOCIATES
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
-
JOB NAME &NA WOODS UNIT 2 DATE REWRTEO 1 /I 6/74
JOB NUMBER 72-105-56 -
DATESCOVERED September 4 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 2 OF 2
- *OlSTliRl CILLD UBONAYonY RLLATIVI OATS Y8ST RCYCST LOCATION LLCVATION CONTCNT DLNBITI DKNSITY CONPACYION MUMMER O? OF TEST s DRY WY. PC? KC K or um. DENS.
J-3 NOV. .-
15 NOV. c-
-
j NOV.
-
-
1 NOV.
-
-
20 NOV.
-
-
j- NOV.
-
j DEC.
-
-
-
30
31
32
ii
35 .
36
37
38
iz
41
49 50
51
5%
54
z65
5;
z;
61
REAR OF LOT 12 152'
14 .I 154.'
13 155"
LOT 11 154'
* REAR OF LOT 14 157'
LOT 49
50
;;
;;
4 5 6
13 158'
FG 191.7'
,' FG 192.3'
FE E
FG 196:O' FG 195.5'
;; ;;i:;:
FG 164.9'
FG 168.3'
- FG 170.9'
FG 173.5'
FG 177.3'
FG 185.8' FG 186.3' FG 186.3'
FG j94.8' FG 194.5'
FG 194.2'
FG 193.7' FG 144.2'
FG 144.8'
FG 145.4'
FG 145.9'
FG 146.6'
FG 147.1'
FG 152.0'
FG 155.0' FG 158.0' FG 159.0' FG 160.0'
FE 16'*0' 151.2'
FG 198.2'
11.1
9.1
10.5 11.1 11.7 13.0
9.1
10.5 11.1 10.5
9.1 9.9
12.3
ii*:
11:1
12.3
12.3
11.7
12.3
1;*: .
10.5
11.1 9.1
1;*;
10:5
11.1
12.3
111.2 122.5 90.8
114.1 122.5 93.2
115.2 122.5 94.2
117.8 122.5 96.1
112.7 122.5 91.9
111.5 122.5 91.0
120.2 129.5 92.8
121.1 129.5 93.5
119.2 129.5 92.0
118.7 129.5 91.5
124.2 129.5 96.0
118.0 129.5 91.2
;:p*:
118:5
117.2
120.8
125.8
121.8
129.5 129.5
129.5
129.5 129.5
129.5
129.5
ii*:
91:5
90.5
93.2
97.0
93.9
119.2‘ 129.5 92.0
117.9 129.5 90.9
119.0 129.5 91.8 125.0 129.5 96.5
121.1 129.5 93.5
120.3 129.5 92.9
119.0 129.5 91.8
117.2* 122.5 95.2
119.0 129.5 91.8
120.8 129.5 93.2
118.5 129.5 91.5
121.1 129.5 93.5
114.0 122.5 93.0
114.7
ii:*; 11710
114.1
114.6 112.9
115.0
125.0 91.7
122.5 92.8
122.5 90.9
122.5 95.2
122.5 93.2
122.5 93.5
122.5 92.1
125.0 92.0
WOODWARD - GIZIENSWI 8 ASSOCIATES
-
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
-
JOB NAME BUENA WOODS UNIT #2 DATE REPORTED 1 / 16/74
JOB NUMBER 72-l 05-56 (STREETS) -
DATES COVERED August 18, 1973 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 1 OP 4
YOImvR8 MTC n*r FICLD RCIL8T UBORAYORY LM*TION RCUTIVL ELLVATION CONYLNT DLNSITT N”Y,ER OF DLNSITT CON?ACTlON 0, ,LSY + DRT WY. Pm PC? K 0, ‘Am. OENS.
-18 AUG.
-
20 AUG.
-
21 AUG. -
22 AUG.
-
23 AUG. .--
-24 AUG.
27 AUG.
-28 AUG.
-
. -
-
-
-
S-l
s-2
s-3
MONROE STREET STATION 73+00 .
STATION 13+50
STATION 13+00
130'
128'
132'
s-4
-g
STAT I ON 14+00 126' STATION 14+50 124' STATION 15+00 122'
:r; STATION 15+50 120'
STATION 16+00 118'
ZO
s-11 _ _
s-12
s-13 s-14
STATION 16+50 116'
STATION 17+00 114' STATION 18+00 108'
STATION 18+85 108' STATION 13+50 130' STATION 14+50 128'
s-15 STATION 14+00 130' S-16 STATION 15+00 126'
s-17 STAT1 ON 13+00 136' S-18 STATION 13+50 134' s-19 STATION 15+50 124'
s-20 s-21 s-22
S-23
STATION 17+50 STATION 18+50 STATION 13+00 ELM STREET OPPOSITE
LOT #49 . . #49
138'
S-24
202'
208'
S-25
s-28 S-27
S-28
MONROE STREET STATION 13t50 STATION 14+50 STATION 14+00 ELM AVENUE OPPOSITE
LOT #49
LOT #49
140' 134' 134'
s-29
212'
216'
8.1
ii:;
it;
9:9
i:;
11.1 10.5
11.1
1;*95
11:1
10.5 9.9
10.5 10.5 11.1
12.3 11.7 11.1
10.5
11.1
10.5 11.1 11.1
10.5
11.1
116.7 117.0
119.5
117.0 118.3
118.6
117.1 116.5
114.8 115.2 118.2
113.9 112.9 116.9
119.3 118.8
124.6
116.5 115.8
115.5
117.1
118.4.
129.5 90.4
129.5 90.6
129.5 92.3
129.5 90.5
129.5 91.7
729.5 91.8
129.5
129.5
90.7
90.7
125.0 92.1 125.0 92.6 .
125.0 94.7
125.0 91.4 125.0 90.6 125.0 93.7
125.0 95.8
125.0 95.3
125.0 99.8
125.0 93.5
125.0 92.6
122.0 94.3
122.0 95.7
122.0 96.7
115.3 125.0 92.6
116.1 125.0 93.3
114.8 122.0 94.3
116.0 122.0 95.2
116.0 122.0 95.1
119.9 125.0 96.2
117.1 125.0 94.1
WOODWARD - GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES enal*.,, ,I”.? sn,. .I,-. wr.l,“m..lnY .“*.“*1.* Itin .TTAl AclGlC
-
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
- JOB NAME BUENA WOODS UNIT #2 DATE REPORTED l/16/74
JOB NUMBER 72-105-56 (STREETS) -
DATES COVERED August 18 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 2 Or 4
MT2 RBT RETLIT Y0’snMn l.OCATlON IICLO CLLVATION ‘ABORAYORY
NUNilLR 0, CONYENY RLUTIYL DLN#I,T DKNWYY O? YLST C~~ICACTION lb DRT WY. UF KC * 01 LAB. DEN,.
30 AUG. s.-30 -
s-31
S-32 - s-33
s-34
-31 AUG. s-35
S-36 - s-37 S-38
- s-39
4 SEPT.
-
-5 SEPT. s-43
6 SEPT. S-46
s-47. -
7 SEPT.
-
0 SEPT.
-1 SEPT.
-2 SEPT.
s-40
s-41 S-42
s-44
s-45
S-48 STATION 41+50
s-49 STATION 40+36
s-50 s-51
S-52 STATION 20+40
s-53 STATION 19+60
s-54
s-55
MONROE STREET
STAT1 ON 16+00
STATION 17+00 .'
STAT1 ON 16+50
ELM AVENUE OPPOSITE
LOT #49
LOT #50
MONROE STREET
STAT1014 18+00
STATION 19tlO STATION 17+50
ELM AVENUE OPPOSITE
LOT #49 LOT #50
MONROE STREET
STATION 13+00
STATION'l4+00 STATION 15+00 .
MONROE STREET
STAT1 ON 17+65
STATION 15+60
STATION 13+70
STATION 13+00 STAT I ON 15+50
STATION 22+50 STATION 19+50
STAT1 ON 21+60
STATION 19+80
124'
120" 122'
220' 226'
114' 114'
116'
224'
230'
144' 136' 132'
118'
128' 140'
144'
130'
1;:
;;I
100'
105'
101'
110'
12.3 11.7
11.1
112.8 122.0 92.7
117.2 122.0 96.2
115.2 122.0 94.3
118.2 125.0 95.0
118.6 125.0 95.7
116.0 122.0 95.4 114.0 122.0 93.4
117.8 122.0 96.6
119.0 125.0 95.6
116.1 125.0 93.4 _
112.2 122.0 92.4
117.8 122.0 96.7 115.2 122.0 94.7
12.3
11.7 11.7
116.4 122.0 95.6
116.1 122.0 95.3
116.1 122.0 93.8
117.7 122.5 96.0 115.9 122.5 94.5
10.5
11.1
125.7 129.5
122.3 , 129.5
96.9
94.5
11.1 12.3 116.2 125.0
115.8 125.0
114.3 125.0 121.5 129.5
93.0 92.5
10.5
11.1
91.5
93.8
12.3 120.0 125.0 96.0
11.7 118.2 125.0 94.5
WOODWARD - GIZIENSII & ASSOCIATES eoNsuLllllc so,‘. Arm ,O”*D**IeH c”(ilMc~*b *ml) ~~cbLol2llll
-
COMF!ACTlON TEST RESULTS
- Jom NAME BUENA WOODS UNIT #2 DATE REPORTED l/16/74
JOE NUMBER 72-105-56 (STREETS)
-
DATES COVERED August 18 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 3 Or 4
DATL YolsYunc rnT ?lCLD REYTLST LADORIYORY LOCATION IIUTIVL - ILLVATION CONTENT NUYDER DXNSITY OF DCNSII* COYCACYION OF TLST % MYWT. cc? KC % OF LAD. OLNS.
-17 SEPT. SL56
s-57
MONROE STREET
STATION 22+50 v' STATION 19+20 12.3 125.0 129.5 96.5 11.1 121.8 129.5 93.9
-18 SEPT. S-58 STATION 20+50 100' 10.5 117.5 125.0 94.1 s-59 STATION 19+70 105' 11.1 120.8 129.5 93.2
-19 SEPT. S--60 STATION 21+60 101' 11.1 1 18.8 125.0 95.0
S-61 STATION 19+75 110' 11.7 1 18.1 125.0 94.5
-24 SEPT. S-62
S-63
ELM AVENUE OPPOSITE
LOT 51
LOT 49
230' 11.7 1 22.3 129.5 94.5
232' 10.5 1 20.5 129.5 93.0
-25 SEPT. S-64 LOT 50 231' 13.0 120.2 129.5 92.8
S-65 LOT 53 217' 11.1 117.5 125.0 94.1
-26 SEPT. S&66
-27 SEPT. S-67 OPPOSITE LOT 1 128' 11.1 115.0 125.0 91.9 S-68 OPPOSITE LOT 4 139' 9.9 120.0 125.0 96.0
28 SEPT. S-69 OPPOSITE LOT 2 132' 10.5 115.7 125.0 92.5 s-70 OPPOSITE LOT 6 142' 11.1 114.9 125.0 91.8
-2 OCT s-71 S-72
s-73
s-74 .-
12 NOV s-75 S-76
- s-77
OPPOSITE LOT 10 (UNNAMED STREET) ,_
OPPOSITE LOT 10 1'37' 11.7
OPPOSITE LOT 11 147' 13.0
OPPOSITE LOT 1 136' 12.3 OPPOSITE LOT 3 142' 11.1
MONROE ST. STA i7+50 MONROE ST. STA 16+00
MONROE ST. STA 14+50
S-78 MONROE ST. STA 1 3+00
13 NOV s-79 MONROE.ST. STA
S-80 MONROE ST. STA S-81 MONROE ST. STA S-82 MONROE ST. STA .- S-83 MONROE ST. STA
121'
130'
138'
146'
8+50 118'
7+00 126' 5+50 135' 4+00 143'
2+70 150'
.-
142' 10.5 115.7 125.0 92.5
120.8 125.0
117.3 125.0
114.9 125.0
118.8 . '125.0
96.5
93.9
91.8
95.1
10.5
10.5
11.1
9.9
11.1 10.5 9.1
1::;
115.1 122.5 93.9 112.1 ‘122.5 91.5
118.9 122.5 97.0
117.8 122.5 96.1
115.1 122.5 93.9
113.6 122.5 92.7
116.5 122.5 95.1
114.1 122.5 93.2
119.0 122.5 91.8
WOODWARD - GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES
eoNsuLrl*C %OlL AN0 ro”MoI*Io* ‘)lol*%t”s *Pa0 c~oLo61s1s
-
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS -
Jou NAME BUENA \:IOODS UNIT #2 DATE REPORTED l/16/74
-JOB NUMBER 72-105-56 (STREETS)
DATESCOVERED August 18 through December 5, 1973 PAGE 4 O? 4
YOINUU OAn nsr CICU) UTCST LUORATORV LOCATION NCLATIVC LLLVATlON CONTENT OCNSITT NUNBLR DCN8ITV OF coN*AcTIoN Of TL8T % DRT WT. ?cF KC lb O? LAB. DENS.
-14 NOV.
-15 NOV
-
21 NOV
-
27 NOV -
-5 DEC
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
S-84 MONROE ST. STA 18+00 123' S-85 MONROE ST. STA 16+50 1314
S-86 MONROE ST. STA 15+00 739' S-87 MONROE ST. STA 13+50 147' S-88 MONROE ST. STA 14+50 143' S-89 MONROE ST. STA 13+00 152'
s-90 MONROE ST. STA 12+70 156' 10.5 113.8 125.0 92.8 s-91 MONROE ST. STA 14+00 148' 11.1 111.5 122.5 91.0
s-92 MONROE ST. STA 16+00 136' 11.1 117.0 125.0 95.5
s-93 ELM AVE 'STA 85+00 SG 217.5' 11.1 119.0 129.5 91.8
s-94 ELM AVE STA 86+10 SG 226.0' 11.1 123.2 129.5 95.2
s-95 RAMP OPP LOT 54 SG 205.5' 10.5 121.1 129.5 93.5
S-96 OPPOSITE LOT 18 SG 167.0' 10.5 120.3 129.5 92.9 .
s-97
S-98 s-99
s-100
s-101 s-102
s-103
OPPOSITE LOT 13 SG 152.0'
OPPOSITE LOT 10 SG 147.5'
OPPOSITE LOT 2 SG 144.0'
MONROE ST. STA 73+00 SG 160.0'
MONROE ST. STA 14+50 SG 148.0' MONROE ST. STA 16+00 SG 140.0'
MONROE ST. STA 18+00 SG 126.5'
11.1
I;-: 11:7
12.3
11.1
113.2 122.5 92.5
112.7 125.0 91.8 111.3 125.0 90.9 117.8 125.0 96.1
113.7 125.0 92.7 115.1 125.0 93.9
11.1 116.9 125.0 93.5
10.5 115.9 125.0 92.7
9.9 114.8 125.0 91.8
11.1 114.8 122.5 93.5
12.3 116.1 122.5 94.8
-lo.5 115.9 l-2.5 93.5
9.9 115.0 125.0 92.0
i
.
WOODWARD . GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IW
1%
IM
110
loo
Bc
sa
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 1 ! 7 3
Dry Denri ty, pcf
Initial Water Content. % _
Fin81 Water Content. % - _ _
Apparent Cohesion. psf -. -
Apparent Friction Angle. ’ - _ _
too
0 Bo L z 260 Q l- 3w
2 Yo
LABORATORY CWACJION Tl
LABORATORY MUPACT I OR
TEST METHOD: ASTM-D 1557=70T A
-loo0 I00 IO 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
~BBLESfG;A;E: [c , yp f ISILT A CLAY 1
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification System I NP I SC I SM
ERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
SWELL TEST DATA 1 7 2 4
lnltial Dry Density. pcf
Initial Water Content. $
Load. psf
Percent Swel I
FILL SUITABILITY TESTS
BUENA WOODS UNIT #2
WODWARD - GIZIENSKI a ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SOIL AND FOUNDATtON ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAX DIEGD, CALIFORNIA
DR. BY: G’j SCALE: --- f?ROJ. 110: 72-l 05-
CK’D BY: FM DATE: l/16/74 [PAGE 1 of 1 s
-
-
-
-
-
-
. . -
-
. . -
-
-
-.
-
-
NECW4lCAL ANALYSIS
I40
.
I30
I20
so
80
lit RECT sii9.R TEST DZTA r I4 I I I
Dry Density, pcf I 80 0 1 z
Initial Water Content. % _ ;; A 260
7
\. ERO AIR VOIDS CURVES oseLEs~$AVEL 1 c YHD
t--tt-rw2m’
I~~~;~;~S;G;
. . PLASTICIIY CHARACTERISTICS 4 : / f i.i P&k 2.50 S.G. I / Liquid Limit, %
1000 100 IO I.0 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Plasticity Index. %
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification Systm Sp
Initial Dry Density: pcf
Initial Water Content. 3
Percent Swell
I MAX IMUM DRY , ILL-l-1 n I I I I DENSITY. pcf \ OPTlbUH MOISTURE
CONTENT. %
I 1 I I I I I t i i i i i ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ MOISTURE CONTENT, %
0 IO 20 30 ul
LABORATORY CWAClION TEST . FIU !iiUITABILIN TESTS
LABORATORY COMPACTION EST METHOD: ASTM-D :557-70A BUENA HOODS #2 1
tdOODb!dXl - GlZl EXSKI h ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SOIL Am FOMIATION ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAN DlEGO..CALIFO~NIA I
DR. BY: GS SCILE:---- PROJ. ~0:72-105-5
CK'D BY: dj' t C\iE: cr -.-mm?3L2Utif 1 v.?
-
-
-
-
-
- I
80
80
z
2 60 a.
c 540 x 2 20
ERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
I I I \l\lT ,2.60 S.G.
tiiiiiiii
-4
~ \-
0-1
lwo 100 IO 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 1
GRAIN SIZE IN HILLIMETERS
OBBLES}G;A;E; ic, yp f ISILT & CLAY
:
PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS ' !
4 5 i
liquid Limit. 3p 27 NP
Plasticity Index. 5 13 MP
Classification by Unified Soil
Classification Systerr, SC -
l
I
t I
SkELL TEST DATA ;
4 5 t
Initial Dry Density1 pcf 117.2 _ / . i
Initial Water Content. 5 9.2 - I
Load. psf 160 -
Percent Swell 2.8 -
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY. pcf
LABORATORY WACTICH TEST
FILL SUITABILITY TESTS
LABORATORY COMPACTION
TEST WEfHOD: ASTM-D 1557-7(X-A BUENA WOODS L
MOOD~ARD - GIZIWSI(I & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SOIL AND FOUflDATlON ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA
DR. BY: AS SCALE: --- PROJ. NO: 77-l&
CK'D BY: ,7 1.’ ‘1 DATE: 4/24/73 IPAGE Of 2 - __