HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 72-20; La Costa Vale Unit 2-4; Soils Report; 1971-05-23I--
i T. FUNNEKOTTER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY PLGISTEPEO GtcxOGISr CEDTiFlED ENGINEERIN: CxOLOGlST P. 0. BOX 171 ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025 746.2793
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
La Ccsta kc. San 3ie:;o comty, Caiif.
Sir:c?s ~113 thm Kl3
GEOPHYSICAL IN”ESIICATIcJNS
For
S”bd~“lrion llerign
P,peliner Roodr
SekrnlC Rqqdilbty Studies
SlOlO
.17.87
T. FUNNEKOTTER - REGiZlERED GEOLOGIST CEWiFlED ENGlNEERlNG GEOIOGIS‘
P. 0. XIX 571 ESCONDIDO. CALIF. 92025 74*-2793
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GEOPHYS,CAL IN”tSTIGArIONS
For
Subdivirion Design
~,~e,ine. Roods
seismic Rippobility Sf"dk.
_ Purpose: To evaluate subsurface conditions at several select locations
in order to provide design and excavation irZornation.
- %&hod: Refraction Seismography. Geologic reconnaissance.
Dis&ssion: All areas investigated are underlain by the Black Eountain
Volcanlcs; however two areas indicate extensive low velocity
sandstone and/or siltstoce. This report includes lines Al3 thru
H13, C13X1, and C13X2. Total Seisnic coverage is 3750 lineal feet.
Line Al3 indicates high velocity material fron 18 feet to 28
-
feet deep. Overlying this is low velocity depositional material
with velocities of 2300 to 2900 ft/sec. Line.Bl3 is conposed of
Black Mountain Volcanics (E&IV) with the high velocity material
appearing at depths of 22 feet to 40 feet, Line Cl3 is also E;fl
- the high velocity naterial here varies in depth from 5 feet to
38 feet. The cross lines on Cl3 indicate siailar conditions. The
southeast half of line Dl3, line E13, and line F13 all indicate
high velocity volcanics from 9 feet to 30 feet deep. On lim D13
from station 4.5 northwest, a different situation exists. Here
the high velocity volcanics were not encountered. Rather, three
low to moderate velocity layers were mapped, i.e., 1300 ft/sec,
1800 to 2000 ft/sec, and 3400 to 4000 ft/sec, This situation
indicates that this particular area is, in ?art, depositional
in character. I.1axim.n genetration here is 45 feet deep. Lines Cl3
and H13 are co:ri::osed of BbIV with the harder high vclocit;y material
-
-
-
‘- T. FUNNEKOTTER REGISKRED GEOLOGISr ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
CER,,FlED UKlNFtRlNG GEOLOGiSi
Pi 0. BOX 575 ESCONDIDO. CALIF. 92025
74&27P3 -
tLOPHYS,CAL ,N”ts1,GAI,ONS
For
S”bd~“i~iO” Design
Pipel;“el Roads
seismic Rippabiiify Sfudie.
-
Discussion: (cor.%I
r.t ~~pt:~s of ,!+ 22%: to 28 feat deep. .:.s usual, the creser.ce cf
scattered blocks oi^ hard volcanic material should be anticipated,
especialljr where noted on the velocity profile.
Conclusion: Virtually all lims investi.Ssted indicate a three layer profile
- - soil, decoqxec: md fractured volcanics, and the parent, high
velocity volcxiics. 'P&o cxceptior,s are noted - 1ir.e A13 and north- -
west half of Dt3 - both are, in part, depositional and conposed
- of softer sandstone and siltstone.
In t3r.m of ri?pnbility, the following schedule would ap~lg:
Velocity (ft/:;cc 1 ticovation Kethod
0 to 2oco Scraper 2000 to 5000 Ripper 5000 to 5500 iiarginal Over 5500 Drill & Shoot
-
-
-
-
- Submitted ~~~~~z<~$&
'i. Funnekotter
--.-
.
T. FUNNEKOTTER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REGISTERED GEOLOGIST CERTlFlED ENGINEERING GEOLOG15T p. 0. BOX 571 ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025 - 746.2793
Benton Engineering Inc. 6741 El Cajon Blvd. San Diego,Calif. 92115 Attn: P. Eenton
.
GEOFnYSlCAL IN”ESTIGATIONS
For
S”bdi”iSi0” resign
Pipeline* Roads
Seismic Rippability S,“di.l
January 1,1973
-
Dear Sir, Enclosed is the Subsurface
Investigation Report 0ALaCosta Vale - Unit 2 - -.
lines Al6 thru E16. Original velocity profile of
these lines is also included.
Very truly yours,
my:,&&
T. Funnekotter
- T. FUNNEKOTWR ENGINEERING GEOLQGY REGISTERED GEOLOGIST
CERTlFlED ENGINEERING GEOLOGlST
P. 0. BOX 575 ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025
746-2793
GEOPHYSICAL IN”ESTIGATIONS
For
S”bdi”irim Derign
Pipeline. Roads
Seismic Pippobility Studies
SUBSUXFACE INVESTIGATIOM
LA CCSTA VALE - UNIT 2
S&ISKIC LINES Alb THHlI El6
January 1,1973
-
-
-
- T. FUNNEKOTTER REGlSTERED GEOLOGIST CERilFlED ENGlNEERlNG GEOLOGIsT
P. 0. BOX 57s ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92015
- 746.2793
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICAL lN”ESTlCATlONS
For
Subdivirion Design
Pipelines Roadr
SeilrniC Rippobility Studier
-
-
Purpose: To evaluate subsurface conditions in three select
areas in order to determine what excavation problems
may he encountered.
Method: Refraction Seismography. Geologic reconnaissance.
Discussion: The Seismic traverses are in the Black Mountain
Volcanic unit - the material ranges from andesite
to rhyolite. This report includes lines A16,B16,C16,
D16,and El6 - located approximately as shown on the
enclosed plat.
In general, three velocity zones were mapped azs
follows:
Velocity Range (ft/sec) Material
1300 to 2000 Soil & fill
2800 to 4200 Decomposed & fractured volcanic
7500 to 10,000 Hard, rigid volcanic
Lines .klC,B16, and Cl6 are in one area and cross
each other. fiigh velocity volcanics were located here
from 12 feet to 26 feet deep. The intermediate layer
of decomposed and fractured volcanics has a velocity
range of 2800 to 4100 ft/sec. The upper soil layer
has a velocity range of 1300 to 2000 ft/sec and is up
to 12 feet deep. Kost of the high velocity material in
this area appears to fall between a depth of 12 feet
and 20 feet. The area immediately west of line Cl6 has
-~ T. FUNNEKOTTER REGISTERED GEOLOGIST CERTlFlED ENGlNEERlNG GEOLOGIST
P. 0. BOX 575 ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025 - 746.2793
-
-
-
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICAL lN”ESTlGATlONS
For
svtdivirion Design
Pipeline* Roods
Seirmic Ripp.bility Studier
Digcussion: (can't)
a considertible amount of rubble and boulders on the
surface.
Line D16 is in the second area. High velocity
volcanics were located here at 28 to 32 feet. The
intermediate zone velocity here measured 3500 ft/sec.
Line El6 is in the third area investigated and
indicates high velocity material at 17 feet. The
overburden velocity here is 4200 ft/sec.
All runs indicate the presence of boulders and
blocks in various degrees of profusion. Some of these
are quite large, especially so where indicated on the
profile. These blocks appear to be most concentrated
in the area of line Cl6 and the northwest end of line
A16.
Conclusion: Hard, rigid volcanic material was located on all
Seismic runs. The depth of this material is from 12
feet to 32 feet - mostly falling between 12 and 20
feet. The overburden velocity falls within a range of
2800 to 4200 ft/sec.
In terms of rippability, based on a D-9 Cat, the
following schedule should apply:
- T. FUNNEKOTTER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REGISTERED GEOLOGIST CERTlFlED ENGNEERNG GECLOGlST P. 0. BOX 575 ESCCNDIDC. CALIF. 92025 746.2793
-
Conclusion: (can't)
Velocity (ft/sec)
0 tc 2000
2000 to 5000
5000 to 5500
Over 5500
For trenching, based on a
should apply:
Velocity (ft/sec)
0 to 3800
3800 to 4300
Over 4300
GEOPHYSICAL IN”ESTltATIONS
For
S”bdi”irion Design
Pipeliner Roods
Seismic Rippobility Studier
Excavation Nethod
Scraper
Ripper
Marginal
Drill & Shoot
Kohring 505, the following
Excavation Method
Ripper
Marginal
Drill R: Shoot
Submitted by
,. ..,
-
-
-
-
~. ,<%- . __ 2-a ‘-._
$ z-1:!
_ -, ‘. -‘-u,.. ‘~ .
. . c-c’ .’ A_. \. .:> *e<,.-. ,‘-._,,
‘. c T- ‘4*, ‘ . ‘.__ . . c;. ’ ,s .’ ‘- c- ‘- ‘\, ‘L -4, .
< .-‘-‘x. ,“,\
-
-
SLIS!"XC - RIPPABILITY INFORMATION
!-
-
-
-
-
The following points should be considered when evaluating Seismic information:
1. All velocities, depths, and thicknesses are averages and qualified according to the following schedule:
F" - good - fair
TP- poor - very poor ? - questionable
Grades of G, F, and P can be considered reliable; VP and ? should be considered as indications only.
2. Each profile provides information in the immediate area of that profile - extrapolation outward from this area must be considered speculative unless additional information is available.
3. As the velocity of the material increases, ripping becomes progre- ssively more difficult until at some point it is more economical to drill and shoot the material prior to excavation. This point occurs within the marginal zone. Rippability figures vary with the type of material, however, in general, D-9 ripper performance is as follows:
Velocity Range (ft/sec) Excavation Method
0 to 2000 Scraper 2000 to 5000 Ripper 5000 to 5500 Marginal Over 5500 Blasting
These figures are based on several hundred job studies.
4. For trencher and backhoe operations the rippability figures must be adjusted downward, i.e., velocities as low as 3500 ft/sec may indicate material that is not rippable, depending on the homogeneity of that material, whereas material measuring over 4300 ft/sec almost certainly would require explosive work. As an average, materials measuring over 3800 ft/sec would mean difficult trenching and the economics of the situation would probably dictate explosive work first. The above figures are based on a machine similar to the Kohring 505.
T. FlJNNEKOTTER RKISTERED GFOLOGlST
-
-
-
.-
-
-
Renton Lnginteri~l:,~ Inc.
6717 Convoy Ct San Dieuo,Calif. 92111 kttn: Sob Zemer
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GEOFHYSKAL lN”ESTlGATlONS
For
Subdivirion Design
Pipelines Rood*
Seismic Rippobilif” Studier
February 26,1?73
&ar sir, is the Subsurface Investigation
s the orip,inals of the Seismic profiles
of these lines. If there are any maps which can locate
the stake I mention near line 517 this would help to
locate the nosition of this line. This stake is a 2x2
nainted white with the upper part painted red and tied
down with wire. If you have any qestions please call.
Very truly yours, cl:I;31 $p-&C~;$f
Ted Funnekotter
L .
T. FUNNEKOTTER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REGISTERED GEOLOGIST CERIIFIED ENClNrERlNG CEOLOCilST - P. 0. BOX 575 ESC”NDI@O. CALIF. 970?1 746.2793
-
-
-
IA CC;i’l’ii VAI,?,
StL3NlC LIiu'Lj: A17 THiiU 517
February 26,1973
GEOPHYSICAL IN”ESTIGATlONS
For
S”bdi”~SiO” rhr*gn
P,peliner bdr
Sei,mic F!+ymbilil” Studier
‘-
1 .
T. FUNNEKOTTER RLGlSTERED GEOIOGISI
CERTlFlED ENGINEERING CECXOGIST
- P. 0. BOX 575 ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025
746~2793
-
-
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GrOP*YSICAL IN”EST,GATIONS
Far
S’Jbdi”irion Derign
Pipeline* Pod
Seirmic Rippability Studies
To evaluate subsurface conditions in nine select
2 r f! 3 s in La Costa Vale in order to determine what
excavation nrohlems may be anticipated.
Xef'raction Seisrno;:ranhy. Geologic reconnaissance.
The areas investigated are all within the Black
!<ount,ain Volc;~riic structure - this unit. is princij~a11y
*:xtrll:;ive ii:rjeous f‘low:; ranf:ing l'rom andesite to
rhyolite. The layer sequence is soil, decomposed and
fractured volcanics with sparse to heavy concentrations
of volcanic blocks within the overburden, and the
parent volcanic rock.
Ten lines were investigated by the Seismic method -
lines A17 thru 517. The approximate location of these
lines is shown on the enclosed plat. The location of
lines fi17, 117, and 517 should be considered as very
general - no good distinctive features here permit
very accurate orientation. However, note on the plat
the position of a red-white stake near the southeast
end of line J. All other lines were oriented from high
voltage towers or poles and distinctive topographic
features.
In general, high velocity volcanics were located on
all of the Seismic runs. The depth of this material is
from 4 feet to 4b‘ feet. The intermediate layer has a
velocity r‘an~e of 2500 to 4600 ft/sec - averaging
around 3600 f‘t/sec. The soil layer is from 2 feet to
-- ..~... .~ ._
I T. FUNNEKOTTER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REGISTERED GEOLOGIST
CER,,F,ED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST
- P. 0. BOX 575 ESCONDIDO. CALIF. 92025
746.2793
-
-
-
-
GEOPHYSICAL IN”ESTlGATIONS
For
S”bdi”iSi0” D&g”
Pipeline* Roodr
Seismic Rippabillly 3udier
DISCUSSION: 9 feet thick.
Line Al'7 indicates from 25 to 29 feet of over-
burden (3800 ft/sec) over 10,OOC ftjsec volcanics.
i/n l~ine Bl'?, the high velocity volcanics rise from
24 feet to 12 feet from the surface and has an over-
l~urd~or~ veloci~ty of' 3100 ft/sec. Line Cl7 shows the
high velocity vo!canics from 23 feet to 48 feet deep,
howr:vt:r , tl0t.e tht‘ owr-hurcien velori t.y .from station 0
c 0 statiorl 1 .5 - it was 1,800 ft/sec in this area. This
is approaching the marginal rippable category of 5000
f‘t/sec. Line Dl'i shows high vel~ocity material rising
steeply towards the east and southeast - from about
40 feet deep to 12 feet deep. Lines b-17, F17, and Cl7
are all in one general area and show the hard volcanics
to be from 4 feet to 29 feet deep, mostly quite shallow.
The overburden velocities here range between 3300 and
4200 ft/sec. This hard volcanic horizon appears to rise
towards the southwest and northwest. Cn line #C17, this
layer is very shallow - from 4 to 9 feet deep. Lines
Hl’? ami <J17 ;jr~: on a mrthwest trrrltiiny; rjripe anti thr
high velocity material here anpears to be roughly
conformable to the surface. Note the rise and fall of
this material across line H17 and the rise along line
J17 towards the southeast. Line I17 indicated high
T. FUNNEKOTTER R,I,,:~>,tKC~, 1;1010~~1s1
< EK,,F,iD ENGINFERINC, CFO,“~;IST
- P. 0~ BOX 515 ESCONDIDO. CALIF 92075 746.2793
,, r,l,, ..:. ~_
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY GEOI’HYSICAL IN”~STIGAIIONS
lo,
Subdlvirion Deqn
Pipelines Roads
Seismic Rippability Studier
DISCUSSION: velocity material at a depth oa approximately 12 feet.
-
-
-
-
-
-
The overburden in these areas contain volcanic
blocks in various degrees of concentration - this is
so innicated on the profile.
CC~~CLUSIC~~: The most troublesome areas in terms of near surface
hard volcnnics aonear to be lines G17, F17, the south-
easterr) end of‘ line Dl7 and the area around lines H17,
517, and I17. In much of these areas the high velocity
volcanic material is less than 10 feet deep.
In terms of rippability, based on a D-9 Cat, the
followin:- schedule should apply:
Velocity (ft/secl Excavation Method
0 to 2@OO Scraper 2000 to 5000 Ripper ~000 to 5500 iv;arginal Over 5500 Drill & Shoot
For trenching, based on a Kohring 505, the following
scheaule should apply:
Velocity (ft/sec) Excavation Nethod
0 to 3800 Rippable 3300 to 4300 IGarginal Cver 4300 Drill & Shoot
Submitted by
T. F‘unnekotter
BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.
APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS
6717 CDNVOI COURT SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA Sc?lll
February 4, 1977
Lo Costa Land Company
2100 Costa Del Mar Road
C&bad, California 92OCB
Subject:
-
Gentlemen:
Project No. 74-5-2D
Final Report on
Compacted Filled Ground
Lo Costa Vole Unit Nos. 3
Cc&bad Tract [Nos. 72-20
Carlsbad, California
This is to report the results of tests and observations made in order to inspect the compaction oi,
filled ground placed on certain areas of La Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4 in Carlibad, California.
“‘The fills were ploc& during the period between June 10, 1974 and January 24, 1977. Also
included in this report are the results of tests taken in trench backfill placed over certain utility
I ines.
- The approximate areas ,and depths of filled ground placed under our inspection in accordance
with the approved specifications are shown on the attached Drawing Nos. 1, 2, and 3, each
entitled “Location of Compacted Filled Ground.” The grading plan used for the placement of - filled ground, doted April 18, 1974, WCIS prepared by Rick Engineering Company.
The approximate locations at which the tests were taken and the final test results ore presented
on pages TLl to T-53, inclusive, under the “Table of Test Results.” The laboratory determinations
of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the maior fill materials are
presented on page L-l, under the “Laboratory Test Results.” Some of the maximum dry densities
shown in the “Table of Test Results” were combinations of these. The tests were taken during the
weekly periods indicated below:
Test Numbers Week Ending
-
1 to 6, inclusive June 15, 1974
7 to 9, inclusive March 13, 1976
10 to 37, inclusive March 20, 1976
38 to 117, inclusive March 27, 1976
118 to 184, inclusive April 3, 1976
185 to 248, inclusive April 10, 1976
249 to 321, inclusive April 17, 1976
322 to 400, inclusive April 24, 1976
401 to 450, inclusive May 1, 1976
451 to 473, inclusive May 8, 1976
Project No. 74-5-2D
Lo Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4
-2- February 4, 1977
Test Numbers
474 to 483, inclusive
484 to 496, inclusive
497 to 520, inclusive
521 to 545, inclusive
546 to 575, inclusive
576 to 608, inclusive
609 to 635, inclusive
636 to 675, inclusive
676 to 697, inclusive
698 to 743, inclusive
744 to 771, inclusive
772 to 811, inclusive
812 to 875, inclusive
876 to 925, inclusive
926 to 970, inclusive
971 to 1044, inclusive
1045 to 1095, inclusive
1096 to 1131, inclusive
1132 to 1186, inclusive
1187 to 1230, inclusive
1231 to 1287, inclusive
1288 to 1365, inclusive
1366 to 1440, inclusive
1441 to 1527, inclusive
1528 to 1581, inclusive
1582 to 1587, inclusive
1588 to 1595, inclusive
1596 to 1614, inclusive
1615 to 1624, inclusive
1625 to 1650, inclusive
1651 to 1660, inclusive
1661 to 1680, inclusive
1681 to 1688, inclusive
1689 to 1692, inclusive
1693 to 1699, inclusive
1700, 1701 and 1702
Week Ending
Moy 15, 1976
May 22, 1976
Moy 29, 1976
June 5, 1976
June 12, 1976
June 19, 1976
June 26, 1976
July 3, 1976
July 10, 1976
July 17, 1976
July 24, 1976
July 31, 1976
August 7, 1976
August 14, 1976
August 21, 1976
August 28, 1976
September 4, 1976
September 11, 1976
September 18, 1976
September- 25, 1976
October 2, 1976
October 9, 1976
October 16, 1976
October 23, 1976
October 30, 1976
November 6, 1976
November 13, 1976
November 27, 1976
December 4, 1976
December 11, 1976
December 18, 1976
December 25, 1976
Jonuory 1, 1977
January 15, 1977
Jonuory 22, 1977
January 24, 1977 (Dote of lost test)
Certain lots on Lo Costa Vole Unit No. 3 were not graded during this period. Those lots not graded
were Nos. 428 to 440, inclusive, 457 to 468, inclusive, 472 to 481, inclusive, 485 and 486.
The Final results of tests and observations indicate thot the compacted filled ground hos been placed
at 90 percent of the maximum dl-y density or greater except in certain street areas which will be
recompocted at o future dote. It hos been determined that the fill materials, compacted to 90 percent
BENTON ENGINEERING. INC.
Project No. 74-5-2L!
La Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4
-3- February 4, 1977
of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing value of 1800 pounds per square foot for one
foot wide continuous footings founded at the minimum required depth and placed five feet or
more inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. If footings are placed closer to the exposed
slopes than 5 feet inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes, these should be deepened one
foot below a 1 l/2 horizontal to 1 vertical line projected outward and downward from a point
5 feet horizontally inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes in areas of no rock disposal.*
Footings founded at least one foot below the surface of the firm undisturbed natural soils may be
designed using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot.
“Expansive” soil conditions exist within the upper three feet below finished grade on certain lots.
The classification of each lot with regard to “expansive” soil conditions is presented as follows:
-
Type “A” (Critically Expansive)
La Costa Vale Unit No. 3 - Lots 406 to 410, inclusive
412, 415
487 to 492, inclusive
La Costa Vale Unit No. 4 - None
arginaily Expansive)
La Costa Vale Unit No. 3 - Lots 416, 417
469, 470, 471
482, 483 and 484
La Costa Vale Unit No. 4 -
Type “C ” (Nonexpansive)
Lo Costa Vale Unit No. - Lots 296 to 405, inclusive
411. 413. 414 I a
418 to 427, inclusive
441 to 456, inclusive
La Costa Vale Unit No. 4 - Lots 1 to 46, inclusive
49 to 71, inclusive
75 to 89, inclusive- -z 103 to lQ7, inclusive 7
112 to 114, inclusi7 ’
* In areas where rock disposal was made at the rear of certain lots as shown on the attached
.- Drawing Nos. 1, 2, and 3, no footings should be placed closer to the top of slopes than 5
feet horizontally inside of the approved compacted filled ground limits shown by dashed
lines.
BENTON ENGINEERING. INC.
-
-
Project No. 74-5-20
La Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4
-4- February 4, 1977
Lots Not Graded cm~~lusive
Lo Costa Vole Unit No. 3 - Lots 42
457 to 468, inclusive
472 to 481, inclusive
485 and 486
La Costa Vale Unit No. 4 - None
-
These lots that hove not been graded should be classified at the time of construction. - - in order to minimize possible detrimental effects caused by the “expansive” soil conditions on the
proposed residential lots, the following special design and precautions are recanmended:
-
1.
2.
3.
-
4.
5.
6. .-
Type “A” (Critically Expansive)
Use continuous interconnected reinforced concrete footings, wherever
possible, and place these at cr minimum depth of 2.0 feet below the
lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface. If isolated interior column
footings crre required, these should be placed ot a depth of 2.5 feet below
the lowest adjacent ground surface. If in-place rock conditions are encoun-
tered at depths of less than 2.0 feet, then lesser depths of excavation are
permissible to a minimum of 1 .O foot.
Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel bars all interior and
exterior footings with Q minimum of one k5 bar at 3 inches above the bottom
of all footings and one fi5 bar placed 1 l/2 inches below the top of the stems
of the footings.
Reinforce all concrete slabs with a minimum of 6x6 - lo/10 welded wire fabric
and provide o base layer of at least 4 inches of 3/4 to 1 inch size crushed rock
beneath all concrete slabs. A moisture barrier should be provided above the
crushed rock ond then 2 inches of sand should be placed over t.he moisture barrier
and below the bottom of the slab.
Separate gcrrage slabs from perimeter footings by cr l/2 inch thickness of construc-
tion felt or equivalent, to allow independent movement of garage slabs relative
to perimeter footings. Assure complete separation by extending the felt over the
full depth of the front thickened edge of the garage slab. Also, cut off the
garage door stops at least l/2 inch above the slab.
Provide positive drainage away from oil perimeter footings with o vertical foll
of at least 5 inches in a horizontal distance of 5 feet outside the perimeter of
the house.
Exercise every effort to assure that the soil under the foundations and slabs has
a uniform moisture content 1 percent to 3 percent greater than opt;msm through’
.- * The required design for commercial buildings may differ from the recommendations presented
herein.
sENTON ENGINEERING. INC.
-
-
,-
.-
.-
Project No. 74-5-2D
La Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4
-5 February 4, 1977
6. Cont.
out the top 3 feet below finished grade at the time of placing foundations and
slabs. The moistened soil conditions need not extend to a depth of 3.0 feet in
those areas where rock or very firm nonexpansive soil conditions are encountered
at depths of less than 3.0 feet.
Type “B” (Marginally Expansive)
Use the same design as recommended for Type “A” loh except items 1 and 2 should be modified as
follows:
1. The continuous footings may be placed at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below
the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface.
2. Single #4 bars, placed as directed above, may be substituted for the fi5 bars
recommended for the Type “A” lok.
Type “C ‘I (Nonexpansive)
Special design for expansive soil conditions will not be required for lots classified in this category.
Oversized rock were buried in certain designated areas in accordance with the project specifications.
The approximate locations of these rock disposal areas are shown on the attached Drawing Nos. 1,
2 and 3.
it is possible that natural in-place rock formations or large rock fragments may be encountered
in excavating to depths of greater thon 1.5 feet below finished grade in certain areas.
All buried exterior utility lines should be City of Carlsbad approved plastic lines due to the
corrosive characteristics of the soils, unless sufficient field tests are taken to establish that
noncorrosive soils exist in the utility trench areas.
Two tests taken in street subgrade and areas of trench backfill that have been placed at less than
the required degree of compaction will be recompocted at a future date. These tests are noted
“To be Reworked” in the remarks column of the “Tatle of Test Results.”
Respectfully submitted,
BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.
BY $ePL
R. C. Remer
Disk: (2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(1)
Reviewed by
R.C.E. No. 10332
Addressee
Attention: Mr. Burton C. Kramer
City of Carlsbad, Eng. Depart.
Rick Engineering Company, Corlsbad
Warmington Development, Inc.
Attention: Mr. Bart Pith
BENTON ENGlNEERING. INC.
-
i -
I
I
t-
,
.~
-.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BENTON ENGINEERING
~~SRW
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS CF SOILS
Project LA c,n-n-f. L-ALE !>t.JliLI 3 i- 4
No. 74 - .q -y:- <3 F
Hole No. Sample No. +s?3& 1 Depth
Date 3. 23.77
.Tested By J-J< (3,
Checked By
ANALYSIS of MATiRlAL ANALYSIS of MATERIAL
Retal ned On -Sieve (WI)
S leve wgt. Cum. Wgt. Cum. % of
No. Retained Passlng Total, Passing
I K I : I Y
From Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve wgt. Cum. Wgt. Cum. 5 of
No. Retained Passing Total Passing
I I I I I
Pan
Total
I I I
I
I I I
I I I
Finer than D
I5
30
I20
250
1440
-~.
-
-
-
,-
-
.-
.-
-
BENTON ENGINEERING MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SOILS
Project 1.0. cfi~m L e/e’ /,&J/?-S 3 e + Date 3--23.-l-l
No. 7-k-r ZDr(
Sample No &V%--
Tested BY .T) @
Hole No. . Depth Checked BY
ANALYSIS of MATiRlAL ANALYSIS of MATERIAL
From Hydrometer Analysis
SiW9 wgt. Cum. Wgt. cum. $ of
NO. Retained Passing Total Pesslng
Ret8 I ned On -Sieve (WI)
I I I 1
/ 1 1 Pan ,
Tota I ! I I I
Pan
Tota I
Hydrometer Analysis :I,:i Corrected Partial
Read i ncl Olam. mm
---I++- I
2
5
IO .-
I.5
30
120 120
---If++ -t-
.-
-
-
-
I 250 I I
1440
22337w3
-.
-
-
-.
-
.-
-
-
-
,-
-
.-
.-
.-
BENTON ENGINEERING
‘ProJect ~4 casix ti-4~~ fg,u~7-s 3 +-4
No. 74--s -2 c?F
Hole No, Sample No.fi !/ = Depth
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SOILS
Date 3-zs* 77
Tested i3~ :n/;3-
Checked By
ANALYSIS of MATiRlAl ANALYSIS of MATERIAL
Reta I ned On -Sieve (WI) From Hydrometer Analysis
I
Pan
Total 1 !
Sieve wgt. Cum. Wgt. Cum. $ of
No. Retained Passing Total Passing
Pan
Total
Time lM
/
15
30
120
250
1440
2233708
-
,-
-
-
-~
-
-
-
-
-
-
.-
.~-
-
-
.-
-
.-
-
BENTON ENGINEERING MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SOILS
Pro.bct LA :- QSTA J/A ~25 c/.-17-‘r 3f-c Date 78 Z-577
No. .74- -s -2 OF Tested BY cw-
x Hole No. Sample No. ,$c 4 Depth Checked By
ANALYSIS of MATiRlAl
Retalned On -Sieve (WI)
Sieve wgt . Cum. Wgt. Cum. k of No. Retaii ned Passlng Total Passing
f L I Y
I j / x ?J :o z;o,a ,,,rYj 0 .d
3s /G/i17 g9,t /
35-1‘6 x.
“T 57ic al.,0 1214 x
Pan 1
Tots I s
ANALYSIS of MATERIAL
From Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve wgt. Cum. Wgt. Cum.
No. Retained Passing Total Passlng
Pan Pan
Tota I Tota I
I
i Hydrometer Analysis 250.0
22337118
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-~
_~
Lot Y/I -33 44 L,, k
bt 95 7’310 CLoca,” “a
3. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. Lot 73,, q1 tid, APPLIEO SOlI. YECHANlCI -- FO”NDATION6
6717 CON”O‘r COURT SAN DIE00 CALIFORNIA DZlll
Lot 1.3 i 19 &oio
Lo+ 7q, //1 4fAlo
PL-
fL
4L-
PHILIP HENIINa llENTON
C”**IrarYI Cl”lL ZNC,PmI” October 7, 1977 T.LI.“ONL ,,I., s65-l*lss
Lo Costa Lond Company
2100 Costa Del Mar Road
Corslbad, California 92008
Subject: Project No. 74-5-2D
Reclassification of
Lots 47, 48, 72, 73 and 74
Lo Costa Vale Unit No. 4
C&bad Tract No. 76-3
Carlsbod, Califomio
Gentlemen:
This is to report the results of recent soils investigations conducted on the subiect lots in
La Costa Vole Unit No. 4. The investigations were made in order to determine the
presence of any expansive soil conditions.
Exploration pits were excavated on the subject lots using a backhoe and it was ccncluded
that only nonexpansive soil conditions exist in the upper three feet below finished grade.
Therefore, these lots are now classified as Type “C” (nonexpansive).
The subject lots were previously classified as Type “B” (marginal) in our report on this
project dated February 4, 1977.
Respectfully submitted,
BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.
BY ML? &
R. C. Remer
R.C.E. No. 19913
Distr: (2) Addressee
(1) City ofcorlsbad, Building Department
Attn: Mr. Ray Green
(1) Westland Company (Delivered to site)