HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 72-20; La Costa Vale Unit 3 Lot 473; Soils Report Peer Review Response; 1990-01-22RESPONSE TO GEOTECHNICAL
PEER REVIEW
(PROJECT PE 2.89:42)
_-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
January 20, 1990
Project No. 8881297-04
Prepared For:
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Department of Engineering 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859
- 5421 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE C, CARLSBAO, CALIFORNIA 92008 (619) 931-9953
FAX (619) 931-9326
-
,.-
-
~-
-
-
-
-
To:
January 22, 1990
Project No. 8881297-04
City of Carlsbad Department of Engineering
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mr. Mike Boraks
Subject: Response to Geotechnical Peer Review (Project PE 2.89:42)
References: Leighton and Associates, Inc., 1989a, Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation, Proposed Single-Family Residence, Lot 473, La Costa
Vale, Unit No. 3, Carlsbad, California, dated March 20, 1989
Leighton and Associates, Inc., 1989b, Revised Slope Stability
Analysis, Proposed Barels Residence, Lot 473, Cadencia Street, Carlsbad, California, dated November 28, 1989
Provided herewith is our response to third party review comments by Owen Consultants dated January 12, 1990 for the subject project. For convenience, our comments are numerated to correspond with the review comments (attached).
1) The sample tested for shear strength was collected from the existing fill soils at the site and remolded to 90 percent relative compaction. The sample was screened of particles larger than a No. 4 sieve prior to sample
preparation. A copy of the three-point direct shear test is attached in Appendix B.
2) Based on our evaluation of the site conditions, we feel that the shear result
discussed above provides a conservative estimate of shear strength for fill and bedrock materials. The test procedure utilized does not account for the
presence of angular rock found in the fill soils which would significantly
raise the shear strength of the soil.
-
- 5421 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE C, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (619) 931-9953
FAX (619) 931-9326
8881297-04
-
-
-.
-.
-
.~~~~
.-
-
-
.,.
-
-
-.
3)
4)
The formational bedrock at the site consists of metavolcanic rockwhich cannot be tested for shear strength by conventional means. However, the shear test
for the fill soils provides an extremely conservative estimate of the bedrock
strength for the reasons cited above.
The values for bearing capacity sliding friction and lateral earth pressure
are typical values used in residential construction. The fill strength values utilized for stability analysis are considered applicable for soil bearing characteristics. However, utilizing these values results in much higher bearing capacity and allowable lateral earth pressures. In typical
residential construction, loads are relatively light and use of these higher
values may result in undersized foundation members. In addition, for this type of construction, settlement rather than bearing capacity governs the
foundation design and use of a lower allowable bearing capacity helps reduce foundation settlement.
Review of grading plans for Carlsbad Tract No. 72-20, La Costa Vale, Unit
No. 3 by Rick Engineering indicates that the fill at the northwest corner of
the lot was placed as part of the grading of Cadencia Street under the
observation and testing of others. Based on pregrade topography, fill depths range from 0 to 7 feet. We recommend the condition of this fill be evaluated
cl;;d;idgrading. Any areas of uncompacted or unsuitable fill should be
Subgrade for roadways should be prepared as other areas to receive fill or
structural improvements. R-value testing should be performed after subgrade preparation to provide representative sampling.
This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions
regarding our comments or require further clarification, please call at your earliest convenien
Respectfully submitted,
LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
,
AL-- Stan Helenschmidt, GE 2064 (Exp. 6/30/92) Chief Engineer/Manager
Attachments: Appendix A - Geotechnical Peer Review
Appendix B - Shear Test Results and Bearing Capacity Calculations
Distribution: (3) Addressee
(1) Owen Consultants
Attention: Mr. Martin Owen (1) Dr. Ron Barels
(1) Mr. Rick Schleis
-2-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.-
-
,‘r’;,.,i,~rh(,.,:.‘,, ‘,~
;,l’,.,‘, #~ ‘,:;A:,,, _I_>,
,;i:: :,si ~;,; ,i 1:
‘LSF .,l>:.,+!:y,
.,a’ ,,:,>,p -4.. it:,:
January 12, 1990
Project No. 1037.1.1
City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department
2075 Los Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009-4859
Attention: Mr. Michael Boraks
Assistant Civil Engineer
Subject: GEOTECHNICAL PEER REVIEW FOR PE 2.89:42
Dear Mr. Boraks:
In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical peer review
of the subject project. For our review we have been provided with the following:
1. “Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single-
Family Residence, Lot 473, La Costa Vale, Unit No. 3
(Tract Map No. 7950), Between Cadencia Street and
Venado Drive, Carlsbad, California,” by Leighton and
Associates, Inc., dated March 20, 1989.
2. “Revised Siope Stability Analysis, Proposed Barels
Residence, Lot 473, Cadencia Street, Carlsbad, California,”
by Leighton and Associates, Inc., dated November 28, 19S9.
3. “Grading Plan For: Cypress Abbey Company, Inc., 1982,
Parliament Road, Encinitas, California 92024,” by Brian
Smith Engineers, Inc., dated October 31, 19i39.
OFrICES iN SAN ONFGO NP,,F?T”I ?‘v\C.~
“NC CONCORO, ‘c&rxN~a
City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department
January 12, 1990
Page 2
- Our review indicates that the following items relating to the proposed 48 foot cut
slope should be addressed or further evaluated by the consultant:
1.
-
-
-~
-
-
Reference 2 indicates that soil property parameters for the
slope stability analysis were obtained from direct shear tests
on “remoided soil samples representative of site fill soils.”
A description of the origin of these soil samples along with
the applicable laboratory test data should be submitted.
2. In Reference 1, the consultant states that cut slopes will be
excavated in the “massive metavolcanic bedrock” and the
loose undocumented fill soils will be removed as part of
slope grading. The consultant should clearly state why the
given unit weights, cohesion and friction angle obtained from
“site fill soils” are applicable to the analysis of the
formational bedrock identified in the area of the cut slope.
In addition to the above issues, we feel that the consultant should clarify the
following items as they pertain to other aspects of the project.
3. Reference 1 indicates recommended design values for
bearing capacity of 2,500 psf; lateral resistance of 300 psf
per foot of depth; and a coefficient of friction of 0.30. The
consultant should provide the results of shear tests or
indicate any assumptions made which resulted in the
selection of these values.
-
.-
-
-
4. Reference 1 states that structural development is currently
not planned in the undocumented fill areas in the northwest
comer of the property. The preliminary grading plans show
a proposed driveway crossing this area and Reference 1
indicates that pavement design will be based on soil
conditions after grading. We request that applicable
recommendations for subgrade preparation and road
improvements be made prior to site grading.
-
QIYi)(CCNSULTANTS
-
- City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department
January 12, 1990
Page, 3
This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions,
- please call.
-
-
-
RMF/MRO:ms
Copies: (2) Addressee
-
-.
NoRMK8TRs8.w
AV@TO@O Moirturo Contww
SampI Location Symbol setor. After Frktkn An@ Cohodora Romarkr
T-5 0 @ 0.5-2' 0 13.1 29" 240
-
Projoet No. 8881297-04
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project Name Barels - ht. 1/2_2/90- Fiouro No. B-1 ~ 3016 matt
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.--
-
_-
-
.-
-.
.-
-
8881297-04
BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS
FOR BARELS RESIDENCE
* = 29’ N = 20.5 B = 1’
c = 240 psf Nq = 34.8 D = 1’
y = 120 N; = 17.7
Q IJtt =cN,tqN,+ tY NY
= 240(34.8)+ 120(1)(20.5)+ t(120)(17.7)
= 11,874 psf
Q all =&= [3,958psf1
3
tan* = 0.55
p = 2/3 tanr = 10.36
op = qtan' (45+$/2)+ 2c tan (45+r/2)
= 120d tan' (45+29/2)+ 2(240) tan (45+29/2)
1 on = [346d t 8151 psf j
B-2