Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 72-23; ALTA MIRA DOWNS UNIT 3; SOIL COMPACTION; 1974-05-17~------------------------------------------------------~----~~----~~~~-------• SOIL ANI> MATI~RIAIA '.rESTING LABORATORY OF" NORTH COUNTY, INC. ~----------------------------------------------~--~~~~~----~~c----- 17 May 1974 Pacific Scene, Inc. 2032 Garnet Avsnue San Diego, California 92109 Attention: Mr. Russ Richards Dear Mr. Richards: Re: Job No. 71-1~ Carlsbad Tra~ Carlsbad, California .. At the request of Mr. Morrison we have performed two (2) additional field density tests in the subbase material and three (3 ) additional field density tests in the road bas-e material within the referenced project, -Carlsbad, California. The field density tests were done in accordance with A.S.T.M. 0-1556, the Sand COhB method. One laboratory compaction test was also performed to determin~ the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content Of the baee material tested. The other tests used were pre.viously determined. All of these tests were performed in accordance with A.S.T.M. 0-1557-70 (method A). The test locations and elevations were designated by Mr. Morrison. The field density tests were taken at subbase finis~ ~rade and road base finish grade elevations. A summary follows: INC. Distribution: 2 Addressee 2 City of Carl~b~d • • LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESUL~S Soil Description Brown Fine to Coarse Sand (D.G~) *Brown Fine to Medium Sand *Brown Fine to Medium Sand * Previously determined FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Date of Test 1974 5-14 5-15 Test Location No. of Test 10 1 1 9 10 11 Lowder Lane Sta. 42+90 Lowder Lane Sta. 48+30 Lowder Lane Sta. 43+30 Lowder Lane Sta. 47+70 Caminito Estrala Sta. 4+75 Field Moisture Content (%) Field Dry Density (pcf) SUBBASE TESTS 8.7 124.2 8.1 130.3 ROAD BASE TESTS 5.3 129.7 7.5 1'28.9 4.2 124.8 Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 131.0 133.5 130.0 • Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 130.0 133.5 131.0 131.0 131.0 SOIL AND MATEmAL TESTING LABORATORY OF' NORTH COUNTY. /!l/C. 2 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 8.3 8.6 10.0 Rela-ti,ve Compaction (%) 95.5 97.6 99.0 98.4 95.3