HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 74-04; Spinnaker Point Phase II; Soils Report; 1984-06-19-
-
-
-
-
FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION
SERVICES DURING MASS GRADING OPERATIONS
FOR
-TRACT NO. 74-4
(SPINNAKY~R POINT, PHASE II)
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
STANDARD PACIFIC OF SAN DIEGO
San Diego, California
BY
GEOCON, INCORPORATED
San Diego, California
June, 1984
-
-.
.- GEOCON
I N c 0 R p 0 R A T E ,, ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS . CONSULTANTS IN THE APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES
-
-
-~
-
-
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
Standard Pacific of San Dlego
7290 Clairemont Mesa Boulevard
San Diego, California 92111
Attention: Mr. Sam Thompson
Subject: CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 74-4
(SPINNAKER POINT, PHASE II)
ELM AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION
SERVICES DURING MASS GRADING OPERATIONS
- Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request and our proposal dated March 2, 1984, we
have provided testing and observation services during the mass grading of
the subject subdivision. Our services were performed during the period of
January 23 through April 26, 1984. The scope of our services included the
following:
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
Observing the grading operation, including the installation
of subdrains and the removal and/or processing of loose
topsoil, existing uncontrolled fill soils and alluvial soil.
Providing geologic inspections and recommendations relative
to the construction of buttress fills and periodic observa- tions of cut slopes.
Performing in-place density tests in the placed and compacted
fill.
Performing laboratory tests on samples of the prevailing soil
conditions used for fill.
Preparing an As-Graded Geologic Map.
Providing professional opinions as to the grading contrac-
tor's general adherence to the geotechnical aspects of the
plans and specifications.
.- = 9530DOWDYDRIVE . SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA 92126 . PHONE(619)695-2880
- File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
-
-
-
. Preparing this final report of grading.
General
The grading contractor for the project was Templeton Engineering
Corporation. The project plans were prepared by Rick Engineering Company
of San Marcos, California and are entitled "Grading Plans for Carlsbad
Tract No. 74-4 (Quail Ridge).
The project soils reports are entitled "Soil and Geologic Investigation for
Quail Ridge" dated November 6, 1976 and "Soil and Geologic Investigation
(Addendum) for Spinnaker Point, Phase II" dated January 10, 1984. Both
reports were prepared by Geocon, Incorporated
References to elevations and locations herein were based on surveyor's or
grade checker's stakes in the field and/or interpolation from the
referenced Grading Plans.
-
-
Grading
Grading began with the removal of brush and vegetation from the area to be
graded and the material was then exported from the site. Loose topsoils,
existing uncontrolled fill soils and loose alluvial soils in areas to
receive fill were removed to firm natural ground.
-
-
Prior to placing fill, the exposed natural ground surface was scarified,
moisture conditioned and compacted. Fill soils derived from onsite cutting
operations were then placed and compacted in layers until the -design
elevations were attained.
-
-
-
-
During the grading operation, compaction procedures were observed and in-
place density tests (ASTM D1556) were performed to evaluate the relative
compaction of the placed fill. Field observations and the results of the
in-place density tests indicate that the fill has generally been compacted
to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The results of the in-place
density tests are summarised in Table II. The approximate locations of the
in-place density tests are shown on the Site Plans (Figures 1 through 6).
Laboratory tests were performed on samples of material used for fill to
evaluate moisture-density relationships, optimum moisture content, maximum
dry density (ASTM D1557-70, Method C), and expansion characteristics. The
results of the laboratory tests are summarised in Tables I and III.
- -2-
GEOCON
-
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
-
-
-
Slopes
Major cut and fill slopes have inclinations of 2.0 horizontal to 1.0
vertical with maximum heights on the order of 20 feet and 60 feet,
respectively. Minor interior slopes have inclinations of 1.5 horizontal to
1.0 vertical. The fill slopes were periodically backrolled with a sheeps-
foot compactor during construction and were track-walked with a bulldozer
upon completion. All slopes should be planted, drained and maintained to
reduce erosion. Slope planting should consist of a drought-tolerant mixture
of native plants and trees having a variable root depth. Slope watering
should be kept to a minimum to just support the vegetative cover.
Finish Grade Soil Conditions
During the grading operation, building pads which encountered clayey soils
at grade were undercut at least 3 feet and capped with granular soils.
Similarly, our observations and test results indicate that granular soils
were placed within at least the upper 3 feet of finish grade on fill lots.
The laboratory test results indicate that the prevailing soil conditions
within 3 feet of finished grade on each building pad have an Expansion
Index of 4 or less and are classified as having a "very low" expansion
potential as defined by Standard Table 29-C. Table III presents a summary
of the indicated Expansion Index of the prevailing soil condition of each
lot.
Subdrains
- Subdrains were installed beneath canyon fills and behind buttress fills at
the general locations shown on Figures 1 through 6. The construction and
design of drains generally conforms to the recommendations contained in the
project soil reports.
,- Buttress Fill
-
..~
--
A buttress fill was constructed in the area shown on Figures 4 and 6 in
accordance with the recommendations contained in the project soil report
dated January 10, 1984. The as-built dimensions are shown approximately on
the above referenced site plans along with the location of the subdrain
installation.
Soil and Geologic Conditions
The soil and geologic conditions encountered during grading were found to
be similar to those described in the project geotechnical reports. The
site is underlain primarily by a Pleistocene Terrace deposit which consists
of red to orange-brown, silty sands. Underlying this unit is the Eocene-
aged Santiago Formation which consists of interbedded sandstone and
-3-
GEDCON
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
claystone exposed only in a few places on the project such as along Elm
Avenue and parts of Pontiac and Lakewood Streets. Bedding attitudes
observed within this unit varied from horizontal to as much as 11 degrees
locally in easterly and southerly directions. Aras containing dips adverse
to slope stability were located in the area designated for buttressing and,
hence, were stabilised during construction. The enclosed reductions of the
approved Grading Plans depict the as-graded geologic conditions observed.
No soil or geologic conditions were observed during the grading which, in
our opinion, would preclude the continued development of the property as
planned.
Based upon laboratory test results and field observations, it is our
opinion that the prevailing soil conditions within 3 feet of finish pad
grade consist of "very low" expansive soils as classified by UBC Table 29C
and "low" expansive as defined by FHA/HUD criteria.
CONCLUSIONS AND FECOMMENDATIONS
.,-. Foundations and Concrete Slabs-on Grade
1. Conventional spread and/or continuous footings founded at least 12
inches below lowest adjacent grade in properly compacted or dense
undisturbed "low" expansive soil may be designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 2,000 psf (dead plus live loads). Footings should have
a minimum width of 12 inches. This bearing pressure may be increased by up
to one-third for transient loads such as wind or seismic forces.
2. All continuous footings should be reinforced with at least two No. 4
reinforcing bars, one placed near the top of the footing and one near the
bottom.
3. In arras where the depth of fill varies significantly from one side of
the structure to another (Lots 84 through 91), it is recommended that
footings be reinforced with four No. 4 steel bars; two top and two bottom.
Foundations for these lots should also be 18 inches in depth.
4. Concrete slabs-on-grade should have a nominal thickness of 4 inches
and, where part of the living area, should be reinforced with 6x6-10/10
welded wire mesh. The slabs should be underlain with 4 inches of clean sand or onsite soils. (Onsite, fine-grained soils meet FHA/HUD criteria
for use as base materials). Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are
planned, a visqueen moisture barrier protected by a 2-inch sand cushion
should be provided. Great care should be taken during the placement and
curing of concrete flatwork to reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking.
-
5. Concrete slabs (including garages) for Lots 84 through 91 should be
reinforced with No. 3 steel bars placed 18 inches center to center to
reduce cracking that may be caused by minor differential settlement.
-4-
GEOCON
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19. 1984
6. Footings placed within 7 feet of the top of slopes should be extended
in depth such that the outer bottom edge of the footing is at least 7 feet
horizontally from the face of the slope.
7. No special subgrade presaturation is deemed necessary prior to placing
concrete, however, the exposed foundation and slab subgrade soils should be
sprinkled as necessary to maintain a moist condition as would be expected
in any such concrete placement.
Lateral Loads
8. The pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pcf should be
used to provide resistance to design lateral loads. This design value
assumes that footings or shear keys are poured neat against properly
compacted granular fill soils or undisturbed formational soils and that the
soil mass extends at least 5 feet horizontally from the face of the footing
or three times the height of the surface generating passive pressure,
whichever is greater. The upper 12 inches of material not protected by
floor slabs or pavement should not be included in design for passive
resistance.
9. If friction is to be used to resist lateral loads, a coefficient of
friction between soil and concrete of 0.4 may be utilised.
Retaining Walls
-
-
-
10. Unrestrained retaining walls should be designed to resist the pressure
exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pcf. This value assumes that granular onsite material will be used for backfill, that the backfill
surface will be level, and that no surcharge loads will be acting on the
wall. For walls with backfill surfaces inclined at no steeper than 2.0 to
1.0, an active pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 45 pcf
should be used.
11. For walls restrained from movement at the top, such as basement walls,
an additional uniform horizontal pressure of (7H) psf (H equals the height
of the wall in feet) should be applied in addition to the active lateral
pressures given above.
12. All retaining walls should be provided with a backfill drainage system
adequate to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic forces.
13. Adequate drainage provisions are imperative. Under no circumstances
should water be allowed to pond adjacent to footings. The lots and
building pads should be properly finish graded after buildings and other
improvements are in place so that drainage water is directed sway from
foundations, concrete slabs and slope tops to controlled drainage devices.
- -5-
.,- File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
-
-
-
-
Any additional grading performed at the site should be done under our
observation and testing. All trench backfill material in excess of 12
inches in depth within lot areas depth should be compacted to at least 90
percent relative compaction. This office should be notified at least 48
hours prior to commencing additional grading or backfill testing.
14. It is recommended that foundation excavations be observed by the soil
engineer or his representative to confirm that finish grade soil conditions
are as anticipated by this report.
LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained herein apply only to our work
with respect to grading, and represent conditions at the date of our final
inspection, April 26, 1984. Any subsequent grading should be done under
our observation and testing. As used herein, the term "observation" implies
only that we observed the progress of the work with which we agreed to be
involved. Our conclusions and opinions as to whether the work essentially
complies with the job specifications are based on our observations,
experience and testing. Subsurface conditions, and the accuracy of tests
used to measure such conditions, can vary greatly at any time. We make no
warranty, expressed or implied, except that our services were performed in
accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and
location.
--
-
We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the
site by others, by the uncontrolled action of water, or by the failure of
others to properly repair damages caused by the uncontrolled action of
water.
If there are any questions regarding our recommendations or if we may be of
further service , please contact the undersigned.
-
--
-.
Very truly yours,
GEOCOS INCORPORATED jp&&
Michael W. Hart
CEG 706
MwH:lm
(6)'addressee
dfl& Thomas V. Langpap
RCE 20427
-6-
GEOCON
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19, 1984
-
-
-
Sample
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TABLE I
Summary of Laboratory Compaction Test Results
ASTM D1557-70
Description
Brown, Silty Clayey SAND,
poorly graded, fine to
medium (Topsoil)
Greenish-gray, Silty Clayey
SAND, poorly graded, fine
to medium
Red-brown, Clayey Silty SAND,
poorly graded, fine to medium
(found with cobble)
Red, Silty SAND, poorly
graded, medium
Orange, Clayey Silty SAND,
poorly graded, medium
Brown, Silty SAND, poorly
graded, medium (Topsoil)
Light tan, Clayey Silty
SAND, poorly graded, fine
Green CLAYSTONE
Light brown to gray,
slightly Sandy Clayey SILT
Yellow-gold, Clayey Silty
SAND, well graded to coarse
Orange, Clayey Silty SAND
poorly graded, medium to
coarse
Maximum Dry Optimum
Density Moisture
pcf % Dry Wt.
126.6 9.1
123.0 11.2
124.4 10.8
128.4 8.7
120.1 12.1
126.2 11.3
120.9 12.4
111.2 17.3
118.9 14.0
119.9 13.2
124.7 10.7
GEOCON
I I
l/23
l/24
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
I I I I I I I I I I !
TABLE II
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Elevation Dry Dens.
Location feet pcf
Slope Zone to Lot 228 273 111.1
Lot 195 267 108.1
11 196 269 114.6
" 195 267 112.4
VI 194 270 115.7
" 195 267 115.4
" 197 272 114.8
" 225 272 111.8
Slope Zone to Lot 199 212 110.6
9, ,I
I, I,
I, ,I
11 11
II 9,
I, II
0 I,
0, I,
II I,
Lot 202
Lot 203
II et 199
II II 199
II II 200
I, 11 199
11 0 200
11 II 202
9, 11 199
I, ,I 200
,, II 201
215 114.5
218 112.5
227 114.9
227 114.0
238 114.2
247 110.9
222 113.4
246 114.8
250 112.8
258 113.8
263 115.3
Slope Zone to Lot 200 233 118.2
I I I I I
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
% dry wt % of max & Remarks
10.8 90 2
13.1 85 1 Ck. #4
11.9 93 2
12.5 88 1 Ck. i/6
12.4 94 2
13.8 91 1
12.6 93 2
14.7 90 2
13.2 90 2
13.1 93 2
11.5 91 2
13.1 90 1
11.8 92 2
12.4 92 2
9.6 90 2
10.2 92 2
12.1 93 2
10.5 90 3
12.8 92 2
11.6 92 2
7.8 95 3
I I
Date Test
SNo.
l/31 22
23
24
25
26
27
211 28
29
30
31
32
33
2/2 34
35
36
37
38
39
8
42
213 43
I I 1 I I I ! I I I !
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Slope Zone to Lot 201
,, $8 II II 201
0 ,, ,, ” 201
Lot 203
Slope zone to Lot 199
0 II II 11 200
,I II 11 ” 229
0 II 11 9, 194
II 0 II 1, 230
Lot 194
Slope Zone to Lot 198
9, II 11 11 195
Lot 196
Slope Zone to Lot 200
Lot 201
Slope zone to Lot 199
I, II ,, ,, 198
Lot 201
Lot 201
Slope Zone to Lot 199
I, II 11 I’ 200
II II ,, 9, 200
Elevation
feet
245
240
249
265
224
237
275
267
279
272
229
269
273
Dry Dens.
PCf
116.5
104.0
113.7
117.2
116.0
115.4
116.3
113.0
113.6
113.4
112.2
244 113.7
253 110.6
237 112.5
235 114.8
257 106.4
257 109.7
236 114.5
229 112.6
234 111.8
I ! I I I
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
% dry wt % of max & Remarks
a.9 93 3
9.0 a4 3 Ck. 1124
12.3 91 3
12.5 94 3
13.9 93 3
11.6 92 5
12.5 96 5
11.8 94 5
12.4 94 5
13.0 94 5
11.5 91 2
12.9 95 5
13.9 93 5
12.1 94 5
13.6 92 5
9.3 93 5
11.9 95 5
10.6 86 5 Ck. #40
11.6 91 5
13.0 93 2
14.1 91 2
12.3 90 2
I I
Date Test 1984 No -s-----.--s
213 44
45
46
47
48
49
50
2/6 51
52
53
54
55
56
217 57
58
59
60
61
0 8 6”:
218 64
n 65
I I I I I I I / I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Slope zone to Lot 199
9, ,I I, 9, 198
IV 0 ,, II 199
Lot 202
Lot 203
Slope Zone to Lot 200
,I I, I, 11 198
Lot 202
Slope Zone to Lot 198
Lot 199
Slope Zone to Lot 198
II ,I ,, ,, 200
(9 I, I, 11 198
,1 ,I I, II 198
Lot 205
Lot 202
Slope Zone to Lot 199
Lot 205
Slope Zone to Lot 198
Lot 200
Lot 201
Lot 200
Lot 199
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
feet PCf % dry wt % of nlax & Remarks
240 114.4 12.0 93 2
239 114.0 11.2 90 1
242 112.5 14.8 91 ~2
267 113.7 12.0 92 2
274 117.0 12.5 92 1
245 111.9 13.0 90 2
241 118.4 12.7 93 1
260 111.1 13.5 90 2
242 117.2 12.1 92 6
244 111.9 14.0 92 7
235 110.5 12.7 90 2
249 108.5 15.1 90 7
237 109.0 16.1 90 7
240 113.3 12.8 93 7
304 106.4 8.6 86 2 Ck. #61
269 117.6 14.2 92 1
247 108.2 8.1 90 7
304 112.5 12.7 91 2
244 112.4 10.7 91 2
250 110.8 11.3 90 2
261 110.8 13.5 91 7
252 112.5 15.1 93 7
253 114.7 12.6 90 6
I I I I I
I I
Date Test
1984 No.
21%
219
2/10
2113
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Lot 200
Slope Zone to Lot 198
Lot 198
Lot 198
Lot 199
Lot 198
I1 201
” 200
” 202
” 203
” 198
” 201
Slope Zone to Lot 200
Lot 199
” 200
” 203
” 203
” 201
Slope Zone to Lot 198
Spokane Way 33 + 85
Lot 199
Slope Zone to Lot 202
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type feet Pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
255 117.5 14.0 93 6
245 119.9 14.0 95 6
249 113.1 12.6 91 2
250 113.1 11.4 91 2
255 113.3 11.0 92 2
252 112.0 14.1 92 7
264 108.1 16.5 97 8
258 104.7 17.9 94 8
272 112.0 13.9 91 2
277 105.3 17.8 94 8
256 117.7 14.6 93 6
268 105.9 20.1 95 8
260 116.7 11.1 92 6
258 103.8 21.6 93 8
262 104.3 18.9 93 8
280 103.0 17.2 92 8
285 111.5 14.6 90 2
268 105.8 21.6 95 8
255 118.7 14.1 94 6
283 110.8 23.5 99 8
261 107.0 22.2 96 8
275 118.4 12.8 93 6
I I
Date 1984
2114
2115
2/16
8
8
2/17
2
Test
No.
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
! I / I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Locat ion
Lot 200
" 198
" 199
Slope Zone to Lot 198
Lot 201
" 200
Spokane Way 36 + 60
I, " 38 + 10
Lot 203
Slope Zone to Lot 199
Lot 198
" 199
" 202
" 198
I' 200
" 201
" 198
" 199
Slope Zone to Lot 226
,, ,, II 11 227
Lot 204
" 198
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
feet PCf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
267 103.8 19.8 93 8
259 105.4 20.6 94 8
265 106.9 21.5 96 8
262 116.3 12.0 92 6
276 103.2 18.6 92 8
273 113.9 12.6 90 1
282 115.8 10.9 91 6
268 117.4 12.2 93 6
286 115.6 9.4 91 6
270 120.8 12.7 95 6
265 102.9 03.4 92 8
272 104.2 20.6 93 8
285 102.2 21.0 91 8
208 103.7 18.6 92 8
277 101.9 22.2 91 2
280 111.5 10.8 90 2
271 106.0 20.2 95 8
274 102.7 23.4 92 8
274 116.6 11.9 92 6
276 117.2 10.6 92 6
293 104.4 18.6 93 8
273 106.7 21.4 95 8
I I
Date Test 1984 No -A
Z/17 111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
2/l% 119
2121 120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
2122 129
130 0 131
132
I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Lot 225
Slope Zone to Lot 225
Lot 227
" 229
Slope Zone to Lot 228
Lot 230
" 226
" 228
Slope Zone to Lot 89/Buttress
" " " " 90 "
Lot 197
" 199
Slope Zone to Lot BE/Buttress
Lot 203
Slope Face Off Lot 201
II II 9, II 199
Slope Zone to Lot 91/Buttress
" " " " 89 "
" " " " 90 "
Lot 204
II 201
Slope Zone to Lot 89/Buttress
Elevation
feet
276
278
280
283
234
236
284
236
268
270
275
278
273
290
271
260
275
277
279
295
234
231
Dry Dens. Moisture
PCf % dry wt
106.0 21.9
117.1 12.2
103.1 22.6
112.3 18.0
112.0 13.7
101.0 20.7
105.7 21.5
104.1 21.8
116.0 12.6
104.5 19.0
112.3 13.6
115.8 11.7
114.0 13.9
106.9 15.1
114.2 12.5
116.5 14.3
114.6 13.2
101.0 18.8
102.5 18.2
118.3 13.1
113.4 14.0
101.0 17.4,
I I I I
Rel Comp Soil Type
% of max & Remarks
95 8
92 6
92 8
92 8
93 5
90 8
95 8
93 8
94 2
93 8
93 5
91 6
92 2
96 8
90 6
92 6
93 2
90 8
90 8
93 6
93 6
90 8
! I
Date Test
ZNo.
2122 133
2123 134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
2127 146
147
148
149
150
0
151
8
2128 152
153
8
154
z
I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Lot 204
" 205
" 204
11 203
" 202
I' 201
" 200
" 199
u 198
" 197
n 196
" 195
11 194
Slope Zone to Lot 87JButtress
" " " " 85 "
" " " " 86 "
" " " " 84 "
" " " " 87 "
" " " " 85 "
" " " " 86 "
" " " " 91 "
" " " " 86 "
Elevation Dry Dens.
feet PCf
FG 298 113.0
FG 306 121.2
FG 299.4 113.7
FG 293.6 115.9
FG 289.5 119.1
FG 285.7 116.8
FG 231.7 117.5
FG 279.4 116.7
FG 277.6 110.9
FG 276.1 115.6
FG 275.2 113.4
FG 274.3 118.5
FG 273.6 111.6
268 102.5
270 103.3
272 104.9
274 104.1
276 100.3
278 102.3
280 102.9
284 115.5
269 113.7
I ! I ! I
Moisture Rel Comp
% dry wt % of max
12.6 94
13.7 97
13.9 90
14.4 91
10.3 94
9.6 92
10.9 93
11.7 92
11.6 92
13.0 96
12.5 94
11.7 98
9.5 92
19.1 92
20.6 92
15.4 94
18.4 93
10.1 90
17.6 92
18.7 92
11.1 91
13.7 90
Soil Type
& Remarks
6
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
1
I I
3/l
8 315
8
2
Test
No.
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
! I I I I I I I I I
Location
Slope Zone to Lot 93
Elm St. 47 + 90
Slope Zone to Lot 87/Buttress
” ” ” ” 87 ”
” ” ” ” 87 ”
” ” ” ” 90 ”
Slope Zone to Lot 94
Slope Zone to Lot 85lButtres.s
TABLE II (Continued)
” ” ” ” 87
” ” ” ” 91
” ” ” ” 88
” ” ” ” 90
” ” ” ” 84
” ” ” ” 86
Slope Zone to Lot 83
Retest of 11169
Lot 132
Lot 128
Lot 127
Lot 225
” 227
I’ 229
” 230
Elevation
feet
274
271
273
273
276
279
283
276
,, 280
to 282
,, 284
II 286
3, 275
II 282
273
273
336
333
331
284
286
289
FG 290.5
Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
PCf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
104.3 20.5 93 8
114.9 10.8 91 6
111.8 11.7 98 5
112.2 12.0 93 5
111.7 12.6 93 5
113.5 13.8 93 7
101.3 19.5 91 8
114.0 15.6 94 7.
101.7 20.2 91 8
104.6 18.6 94 8
112.0 12.9 92 7
110.1 14.0 92 9
99.9 16.8 90 8
110.9 12.8 91 7
107.4 10.7 88 7 Ck. #170
111.0 13.1 91 7
114.2 10.7 90 6
118.5 10.4 93 6
119.2 11.9 94 6
117.0 13.0 92 6
114.2 12.3 90 6
115.3 10.5~ 91 6
118.1 12.7 93 6
I I I I I
I I
Date
1984
3/5
3/6
317
I3
8 3/S
Test
No.
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Elevation Dry Dens.
feet PCf
Lot 229 290
” 228 289
” 109 FG 325
” 133 340
” 129 336
” 127 335
” 109 325
Lawrence St. 38 + 30 372
Spokane Way 35 + 70 389
Lot 107 326
Slope Zone to Lot 85/Buttress 283
” ” ” ” 89 ” 287
Lot 108 327
” 110 328
” 111 329
Slope Face Off Lot 199 246
0 11 11 ” 198 261
Slope zone s. of Lot 86/Buttress 287
Lot 131 341
Slope Zone s. of Lot 90/Buttress 292
Lot 130 342
” 115 223
” 114 225
115.7
* 119.2
112.0
123.2
117.1
119.7
115.8
120.0
112.5
112.3
115.4
117.6
111.3
112.1
112.6
111.2
121.2
114.8
119.8
115.8
116.3
111.8
111.2
I I I I I
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
% dry wt % of max & Remarks
11.4 91 6
12.1 94 6
11.0 88 6 Ck. #184
15.3 97 6
12.9 92 6
9.8 94 6
11.8 91 6
9.1 95 6
9.2 93 5
13.4 93 5
12.0 91 1
11.1 93 6
9.5 92 5
11.5 93 5
12.7 93 5
12.0 90 2
14.1 96 6
12.1 93 2
13.8 94 6
12.6 91 1
15.1 92 6
13.6 93 5
8.7 87 6 Ck. #202
I I
,
Date Test 1984
3/S
319
No.
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Slope Zone to Lot 84lButtress
Retest of #200
” 90
” 117
” 116
Slope Zone to Lot 94
Lot 119
” 118
Slope Zone to Lot 94
” ” ” ” 95
” ” ” ” 92
Lot 118
” 115
Slope Zone to Lot 91/Buttress
Lot 125
” 125
” 126
I’ 227
” 226
” 225
Lawrence St. 38 + 60
Spokane Way 37 + 35
Slope Face to Lot 228
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
feet Pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
284 104.3 19.6 93 8
225 117.5 12.4 93 6
295 105.2 21.1 94 8
220 119.5 12.1 94 6
224 109.7 11.6 91 5
279 103.6 10.7 85 7 Ck. #209
318 118.3 14.2 98 5
321 113.7 13.6 94 5
279 111.5 14.6 92 7
282 108.3 16.1 90 7
287 108.9 14.3 90 7
323 118.4 12.1 93 6
326 115.5 14.3 96 5
290 112.6 15.0 93 7
333 111.8 8.1 88 6 Ck. #216
333 116.3 10.2 92 6
336 117.6 12.4 93 6
FG 289 109.9 7.5 91 5
FG 288 112.4 6.7 93 5
FG 287 108.7 6.4 90 5
273 111.8 8.5 93 5
279 111.4 8.9 92 5
283 109.1 12.5 90 5
I I I I I
I I
Date Test
1984 No P--.--L
3/10 224
225
226
3112 227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
3113 237
238
239
240
241
242
243
8
3114 244
245
246
I / ! I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Elevation Dry Dens.
feet PCf
Slope Face to Lot 226
Lot 112
” 113
” 135
” 85
” 136
” 134
Slope Zone to Lot 92/Buttress
Slope zone to Lot 92
Lot 128
” 135
Slope Zone to Lot 93
Slope Zone to Lot 86/Buttress
Slope Zone to Lot 94
Lot 91
” 89
Slope Zone to Lot 95
” ” ” ” 95
” ” ” “ 94
” ” ” ” 94
Slope Zone to Lot 91/Buttress
Slope Zone to Lot 93
Slope Zone to Lot 9O/Buttress
282 108.6
225 118.9
227 109.2
335 114.4
292 106.8
337 112.4
340 116.9
294 105.3
291 102.9
340 114.6
342 123.4
288 103.8
294 108.2
285 102.9
296 114.9
297 117.2
286 106.0
289 102.5
292 112.1
295 114.0
299 122.3
299 115.4
302 116.8
I I I I I
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
% dry wt % of max & Remarks
9.4 90 5
11.6 94 6
10.9 91 5
12.2 93 2
17.5 96 8
10.3 91 2
12.9 92 6
20.6 93 8
18.9 92 8
9.9 90 6
12.6 97 6
22.0 93 8
21.2 97 8
19.2 92 8
14.0 90 1
13.5 92 1
20.8 95 8
21.8 92 8
9.9 91 2
11.9 90 6
13.7 96 6
14.0 96 5
12.6 92 6
I I
Date Test 1984 No -A
3114 247
248
249
250
251
3115 252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
3/16 261
262
263
264
I2 265
266
8
267
268
I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Slope Zone to Lot 95
Lot 106
" 137
II 132
I, 129
Slope Zone to Lot 84/Buttress
" " " " 85 "
Lot 138
It 126
" 130
" 134
" 88
Slope Zone to Lot 82
" " " " 85
Lot 144
" 145
Slope Zone to Lot 94
Lot 89
Slope Zone to Lot 83
Lot 173
rl 141
Retest of #267
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
feet PCf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
303 112.2 13.1 93 5
313 109.7 10.7 91 5
341 115.1 11.6 91 6
344 110.2 11.6 91 5
344 114.5 10.2 90 6
278 114.1 9.4 90 6
287 116.7 12.3 92 6
343 113.6 11.3 94 5
342 114.8 12.2 95 5
346 124.7 15.8 98 6
346 117.0 14.7 97 5
305 118.2 14.2 93 6
278 115.4 10.6 91 6
288 116.2 11.5 92 6
230 112.4 9.3 93 5
232 111.7 9.8 93 5
306 112.6 10.5 93 5
307 115.6 11.1 96 5
277 110.8 10.2 92 5
232 109.9 8.7 91 5
234 106.4 8.2 88 5 Ck. #268
234 111.2 10.0 92 5
I ! I I
I /
Date Test
ENo.
3117 269
270
271
272
273
274
3119 275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
3120 284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Lot 107
n 108
" 109
(1 110
" 111
" 112
Slope Zone to Lot 80
II 0 II I, 81
Lot 144
,, 142
" 91
Slope Zone to Lot 147
Lot 148
I8 140
Slope zone to Lot 150
Lot 149
n 146
I' 150
Slope Zone to Lot 79
" " " " 82
Slope Face Off Lot 196
Slope Zone to Lot 84IButtress
Lot 147
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Camp Soil Type
feet pcf % dry wt % of max h Remarks
FG328 115.8 8.8 91 6
FG 329 115.0 9.2 91 6
FG330 114.8 8.1 95 5
FG 330 113.5 6.6 94 5
FG 330 113.0 6.6 94 5
329 124.6 9.3 98 5
283 113.5 8.7 94 5
284 112.2 10.4 93 5
337 114.0 9.6 94 5
340 113.2 10.5 94 5
307 115.3 12.8 96 5
321 113.6 13.2 94 5
324 114.6 11.5 90 6
343 111.9 9.8 93 5
327 117.4 11.1 93 6
329 112.5 12.7 93 5
333 114.7 12.2 95 5
333 116.0 12.8 96 5
287 117.4 13.2 97 5
289 113.4 11.9 94 5
271 116.3 11.1 92 6
291 116.8 11.5 92 6
335 115.1 11.9 95 5
I 1 I I I
I I
Date Test
NO. 1984
3120 292
293
294
3/21 295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
3122 304
305
306
307
308
309
310
3/23 311
8
312
313
314
I I ! I I I / I I I
TABLE II (Continued)
Location
Lot 157
” 148
” 125
” 149
” 145
” 143
” 146
” 150
” 148
” 151
” 138
si0pe zone to Lot 78
Retest .of #302
” 144
Slope Zone to Lot 80
Lot 85
Slope Zone to Lot 84fButtress
Slope Zone to Lot 81
” ” ” ” 78
” ” ” ” 83
” ” ” ” 79
” ” ” ” 78
vs II 1, 1, 82
Elevation Dry Dens.
feet PCf
337 116.2
339 113.7
338 110.8
341 112.5
342 113.8
344 110.6
345 115.1
342 113.6
346 111.9
343 110.6
343 106.4
299 114.0
343 111.9
346 120.4
290 107.7
301 115.3
296 117.2
291 111.4
298 109.6
296 113.6
300 116.1
305 117.9
298 111.5
I I I I I
Moisture
% dry wt
13.2
11.5
9.5
9.9
12.4
11.9
13.2
12.8
13.2
10.7
14.5
11.9
13.6
13.6
15.4
14.1
11.5
12.8
10.3
14.1
13.2
12.4
14.9
Rel Comp Soil Type
% of max b Remarks
96 5
94 5
92 5
93 5
94 5
92 5
95 5
94 5
93 5
92 5
88 5 Ck. 8304
92 2
93 5
95 6
90 9
91 6
92 6
92 5
91 5
94 5
96 5
93 6
92 5
I I
Date Test
1984 No -d-.--L
3/23 315
316
317
318
3124 319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
3/26 329
330
331
332
333
334
8
335
336
! I 1 I I I 1 \ ,
TABLE II (Continued)
Elevation Dry Dens.
Location feet PCf
Lot 84 304 111.3
Slope Zone to Lot 77 310 118.5
Lot 86 307 114.0
Slope Zone to Lot 81
!, !I II " 79
II ,I I, " 82
Slope Zone to Elm St. 51 + 00
Retest df #321
I, I, I, II 11 51 f 10
II II II II " 50 + 90
Retest of f/324
1, I, ,, I, In 51+00
II II II 11 n 51f 15
II 11 I, II 11 50 90 +
Slope Zone to Lot 94
Slope Zone to Lot 87/Buttress
Slope Zone to Lot 78
I, II 8, I' 80
Slope Zone to Elm St. 50 f 90
1, I, II II n 51 + 20
Slope Zone to Lot 85fButtress
Lot 91
301 112.3
304 112.4
302 112.0
236 104.0
236 111.0
239 116.3
239 102.6
241 111.5
244 110.1
247 113.7
249 111.9
310 113.4
311 116.0
312 112.7
307 115.0
252 112.0
255 117.8
313 115.7
315 111.6
I I ! I I
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
% dry wt % of max & Remarks
12.4 92 5
11.5 98 5
13.6 95 5
11.9 93 5
10.2 93 5
11.6 93 5
13.7 84 2 Ck. #322
14.9 90 2
15.1 91 1
21.8 86 9 Ck. #325
19.4 93 9
18.2 92 9
13.5 92 2
15.6 91 2
11.1 94 5
11.5 91 6
10.7 93 5
12.8 95 5
10.3 91 2
11.9 93 6
12.8 96 5
14.5 92 5
I /
Date Test 1984 No -4
3126 337
338
339
3121 340
347
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
347
3128 350
351
352
353
354
355
356
8
357
! I I I / I 1
Location
Slope Zone to Elm St. 50 + 80
Slope Zone to Lot 83
Slope Zone to Elm St. 51 + 40
Lot 87
Lot 77
Lot 82
Slope Zone to Lot 93
Lot 230 S. Facing Slope Zone
Retest of #344
Lot 84
Lot 230 S. Facing Slope Zone
Lot 81
Lot 230 S. Facing Slope Zone
Lot 77
Lot 88
Elm St. 51+00
Slope Zone to Lot 95
Lot 86
Lot 79
Retest of 353
Elm St. 51+40
TABLE II (Continued)
Elevation
feet
259
312
262
316
318
315
315
284
284
317
287
317
289
321
318
264
317
320
321
317
Dry Dens. Moisture
PCf % dry wt
114.3 12.8
116.3 11.5
109.1 13.6 112.7 12.4
116.2 12.8
117.5 11.9
115.8 13.6
107.8 11.9
114.f 12.8
116.1 9.5
113.9 13.2
115.9 12.4
112.7 9.5
124.8 11.9
117.8 11.1
101.6 21.0
111.3 9.5
113.3 11.9
117.9 10.3
123.2 10.7
124.0 17.3
Rel Comp Soil Type
% of max & Remarks
90 1
96 5
99: 3
96 5
93 6
91 6
85 6 Ck. #345
90 6
91 6
92 2
91 6
93 5
98 6
93 6
91 8
88 6 Ck. #356
94 5
93 6
97 6
93 8
I I I I I , I I I I /
Date Test
1984 No.
3128 358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
3130 367
368
369
370
371
372
373
131 374
375
8
376
377
378
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Location
Lot 92
Lot 93
Slope Zone S. of Elm St. 44+25
Slope Zone S. of Elm St. 44+80
Slope Zone S. of Elm St. 44+00
Lot 94
Elm St. 51+60
Slope Zone to Elm St. 44+50
Lot 83
Slope Zone to Elm St. 44+40
Lot 89
Elm St. 52fOO
Lot 80
Lot 78
Slope Zone to Elm St. 44+00
Slope Zone to Elm St. 43+35
Lot 138
Lot 137
Lot 136
Lot 135
Lot 134
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Camp Soil Type
feet pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
319 126.2 11.1 91 6
320 124.7 11.5 92 11
245 114.0 14.1 92 2
252 116.7 13.6 92 1
257 110.7 15.4 93 9
321 114.8 9.5 92 11
270 112.1 11.5 91 2
260 112.6 14.1 93 5
319 118.4 10.3 94 11
263 107.6 15.8 90 9
372 114.7 9.1 91 10
272 113.8 10.7 92 2
322 118.8 11.9 95 11
324 116.2 11.1 93 11
370 112.0 14.1 93 5
374 106.1 16.3 95 8
FG 345 116.0 9.9 93 11
FG 346 117.1 9.8 93 11
FG 346 117.0 9.4 93 11
FG 347 115.3 8.2 92 11
FG 348 118.0 10.8 94 11
I I I I I I I
/ I I I I I I I I I I
Date Test
l9.84J!L
3131 379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
8
397
398
399
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Location
Lot 133
Lot 132
Lot 131
Lot 130
Lot 129
Lot 128
Lot 127
Lot 126
Lot 125
Lot 113
Lot 115
Lot 116
Lot 117
Lot 118
Lot 119
Lot 151
Lot 150
Lot 149
Lot 148
Lot 147
Lot 146
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type feet pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
FG 348 118.5 8.8 94 11
FG 348 114.1 10.7 91 11
FG 347 114.0 11.0 91 11
FG 347 113.1 10.1 90 11
FG 346 117.6 11.3 94 11
FG 345 117.'6 13.1 94 11
FG 345 118.9 11.4 95 11
FG 344 114.9 7.9 92 11
FG 339 124.8 7.1 98 6
FG 329 113.5 7.1 90 11
FG 327 114.8 8.9 92 11
FG 326 113.0 11.2 90 11
FG 326 115.6 8.2 92 11
FG 324 114.3 9.7 91 11
FG 321 118.6 9.9 95 11
FG 339 113.8 10.8 91 11
FG 346 113.5 9.7 90 11
FG 346 116.1 9.5 93 11
FG 347 112.1 9.7 90 11
FG 348 116.0 10.0 93 11
FG 348 116.2 8.4 93 11
I I I I I I
I I I I I I ! I I I I
Date Test
u$iLNo.
3131 400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
8 418
419
I4 420
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Location
Lot 145
Lot 144
Lot 143
Lot 142
Lot 141
Lot 140
Elm St. 44+50
Slope Face to Lot 143
Slope Face to Lot 146
Slope Face to Lot 150
Lot 96
Lot 82
Lot 79
Slope Face to Lot 127
Slope Face to Lot 132
Slope Face to Lot 136
Lot 87
Lot 91
Lot 95
Elm St. 52+50
Lot 88
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Camp Soil Type
feet pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
FG 348 113.7 7.1 91 11
FG 347 121.5 8.8 97 11
FG 347 116.1 9.8 93 11
FG 345 115.2 9.6 92 11
FG 343 118.0 10.3 94 11
FG 344 113.1 8.1 91 11
271 112.3 11.9 91 2
334 104.5 13.2 87 5 Ck. #429
340 103.0 12.4 85 5 Ck. #430
332 115.8 12.8 92 11
327 115.5 10.7 92 11
323 115.7 11.1 92 11
325 116.0 11.5 93 11
332 110.5 9.5 87 6 Ck. #427
339 103.2 7.1 82 6 Ck. #428
339 113.3 11.5 90 b
322 115.8 10.3 92 11
323 113.7 9.9 92 2
323 115.6 11.5 93 2
274 112.1 10.3 91 2
323 114.7 '10.7 91 11
I / I I ! I I I , I I I I / I
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Date Test 1984 No.
414 421
422
423
415 424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
4/a 433
434
435
436
Q *37
/lU
8
430
43Y
cl 440
!i!
Location
Lot 90
Lot 96
Lot 93
Lot 92
Lot 95
Lot 96
Retest of 413
Retest of 414
Retest of 407
Retest of 408
Slope Zone N. of Lot 153
Slope Zone N. of Lot 153
Lot 93
Lot 84
Lot a2
Lot YO
Idot 71
Lot 85
Lot 81
Lot 89
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type
feet pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
324 115.4 11.5 93 2
324 112.8 9.9 90 11
325 116.0 12.8 93 11
326 117.2 12.4 93 11
326 115.6 11.9 92 11
327 117.8 12.4 94 11
332 117.0 8.9 92 6
339 115.6 11.3 91 6
334 105.2 13.8 84 11 Ck. #449
340 104.6 14.5 83 11, Ck #450
329 115.1 13.2 92 11
332 114.3 11.8 91 11
328 113.7 14.3 94 2
322 116.5 12.7 r5 2
3L5 111.3 13.5 91 2
3~6 113.u 12.4 91 11
3~8 113.0 12.9 91 11
~25 116.8 lU.5 Y4 11
~24 116.1 11.5 93 11
324 118.3 14.5 95 11
I I
Date Test
JAa4~
4111 441
442~
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
4112 452
453
454
455
456
8 459
460
I I I I I !
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Location
Lot 92
Lot 95
Lot 79
Lot 77
Lot 84
Lot 86
Slope East, Lot 141
Lot 78
Retest of f/429
Retest of #430
Lot 78
Slope North, Lot 153
Lot 78
Lot 96
Elevation Dry Dens.
feet pcf
328 120.9
329 116.1
327 113.5
326 117.4
324 117.7
325 111.8
336 112.4
326 105.8
334 102.6
340 112.5
326 112.2
331 113.7
328 113.0
331 113.5
Lot 94 330 117.7
Corvallis Street, St. 8+63 449 116.0
Elm Avenue, Sta. 43+50 271 112.2
Elm Avenue, Sta. 42+40 284 112.7
Elm Avenue, Sta. 43+00 273 113.2
Elm Avenue, Sta. 44+00 275 114.0
I I I I I I /
Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type % dry wt % of max & Remarks
14.9 94 25
15.5 90 25
11.5 91 11
12.5 94 11
13.5 94 11
14.3 91 2
12.0 90 11
13.0 85 11 Ck. #451
13.3 82 11 Ck. 11461
15.1 90 11
11.9 90 11
14.2 91 11
12.4 91 11
11.6 91 11
13.6 94 11
11.2 93 11
11.1 90 3
11.3 91 3
12.5 91 3
13.1 92 3
I ! I I
Date Test 1984 &
4113 461
462
463
4116 464
465
466
467
468
4117 469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
&B ::i
8
479
480
z
Location
Slope East, Lot 143 334 112.6 13.0
Elm Avenue, Sta. 45+00 269 114.8 12.2
Elm Avenue, Sta. 42+50 286 117.8 10.9
Brentwood, Lot 71 F.G. 307 112.6 11.3
Brentwood, Lot 70 F.G. 301 116;5 8.7
Brentwood, Lot 72 F.G. 311 111.7 6.8
Brentwood, Lot 73 F.G. 316 114.9 9.8
Brentwood, Lot 74 F.G. 319 105.9 10.0
Brentwood, Lot 77 F.G. 328 117.8 12.6
Brentwood, Lot 81 F.G. 328 111.5 10.0
Brentwood, Lot 82 F.G. 327 113.2 9.5
Brentwood, Lot 83 F.G. 327 111.6 9.5
Brentwood, Lot 84 F.G. 326 115.7 11.7
Brentwood, Lot 85 F.G. 326 115.9 11.0
Brentwood, Lot 86 F.G. 326 115.5 10.5
Brentwood, Lot 87 F.G. 327 118.2 11.4
Brentwood, Lot 88 F.G. 328 110.9 11.1
Brentwood, Lot 69 F.G. 294 121.9 11.4
Brentwood, Lot 89 F.G. 328 113.4 14.3
Brentwood, Lot 90 F.G. 329 112.1 14.9
I I I ! I
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Elevation Dry Dens. Moisture feet Rel Comp pcf Soil Type % dry wt % of max & Remarks
I I I I I I
95
90
91
90
93
96
96
95
92
92
94
93
11
2
3
7
3
3
3
3 Ck. i/511
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
3
5
4
7
7
Date Test 1984 J&.
4119
4120
4123
4124
481 Brentwood, Lot 91 F.G. 330
482 Brentwood, Lot 92 F.G. 330
483 Brentwood, Lot 96 F.G. 331
484 Brentwood, Lot 97 333
485 Brentwood, Lot 93 F.G. 331
486 Open Slope, Lot 80 308
487 Open Slope, Lot 81 310
488 Open Slope, Lot 83 306
489 Brentwood Drive, Sta. 26+35 328
490 Topeka Street, Sta. 2+95 320
491 Corvalus Str-et, Sta. 2+37 340
492 Corvalus street, sta. 5+10 343
493 Corvalus street, sta. 8+50 343
494 Topeka Street, Sta. 8+10 326
495 Topeka Street, Sta. 5+90 324
496 Slope North, Elm Avenue, Sta. 43+25 270
497 Slope North, Elm Avenue, Sta. 44+55 267
498 Open Slope, Lot 85 313
499 Open Slope, Lot 90 316
500 Open Slope, Lot 95 324
I / I I I I I I !
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Location Elevation
feet Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp pcf Soil Type % dry wt % of max & Remarks
114.0 11.1 92 3
113.9 7.5 91 11
116.7 10.8 94 11
114.4 12.4 95 7
116.2 13.0 93 11
112.2 13.4 93 5
114.3 12.0 95 5
111.0 11.7 92 5
118.2 11.0 95 11
115.5 10.8 93 11
116.3 11.5 93 11
115.6 12.0 93 11
112.2 11.1 91 11
115.6 10.4 93 11
119.0 10.1 95 11
108.1 7.3 85 1 Ck. #503
109.8 8.1 87 1 Ck. #504
109.4 14.2 91 5
116.1 13.3 90 25
116.0 13.6 93 11
I I I I
I I I I,
Date Test
l3L-!w Location
4/24 501 Lot 114
502 Lot 113
4125 503 Retest of i/496
504 Retest of #497
505 Lot 97
506 Lot 96
507 Lot 95
508 Lot 94
509 Slope N. of Lot 77
510 Retest of #504
511 Retest of #468
618 512 Lot 78
513 Lot 79
514 Lot 80
515 Lot 153
I I I I I 1
TABLE II Continued
Summary of Field Density Test Results
Elevation feet
F.G. 328
F.G. 329
268
265
334
333
332
332
318
265
FG 319
FG 330
FG 330
FG 329
FG 339
Dry Dens. Moisture Rel Comp Soil Type pcf % dry wt % of max & Remarks
113.6 11.6 91 11
116.8 11.0 94 11
113.9 11.5 91 11
109.0 9.6 *_.~I 11 Ck. #510
113..4 12.3 92 2
116.1 11.7 94 2
114.5 11.5 93 2
118.0 10.7 94 11
113.7 13.3 91 11
113.3 11.1 90 11
113.8 6.8 91 11
119.0 4.5 95 11
117.4 5.3 94 11
116.7 5.6 93 11
116.1 4.1 93 11
I I ! 1 !
File No. D-0684-MO3
June 19. 1984
.-
-
-
.-
-
-
-
TABLE III
Expansion Index
Lots 69-153, 194-206, 225-230
Fill and Cut/Fill Lots
Lot No.
77
78-80
81-84
85-86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94-97
107
108
109-112
EI Lot NO. -
1.4 115-119
4 125
1.4 126-138
0 140-151
1.4 153
0 194-204
1.8 205
1.8 225-230
1.4
4
4
3.2
6
6
0
EI -
4
0
4
4
L
0
1.4
0
Lot No.
69-70
71
72-76
98-106
113
114
120-124
139
152
206
cut Lots
EI -
4.2
4.2
0
1.4
4
4
1.4
4
4
4