The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 81-52; Sudan Interior Mission; Soils Report; 1988-02-08- - : - _- - - - - February 6. 1983 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619)743-8808 Sudan Interior Mission 1400 Flame Tree Ln. Carlsbad, CA 92006 PRELIMINARY SOILS ,INVESTIGATION To whom it may concern: This is to verify that I have checked foundation soil conditions for lots as shown on attached sketch to update the preliminary soils report dated 12/03/79 by Southern California Testing Labs. An erosion cavity exists around the drop-inlet and downdrain at the NW corner of the proposed site. The cavity should be backfilled properly with native material before footings are cast. No other changes have occured and all other aspects of the proposed construction should be completed in accordance with the prior soils report. We are recommending two #4 bars top and two bottom in a13 footings and #3 bars @ 24" on center each way in all slabs, as minimum reinforcement. We will be available for prejob conference and certification testing at notification when the grading work is scheduled, and at the time footing excavations are made. - RCE 21121, GE 050 Exp. g/30/09 99% CjWlOQ( & *Es “4& t? OF 8 2 ,” *.czm zz g e 9 s CIW g$ +t OF cPk@ - -----..: __ .~ %Ju i ‘-~-. 1 ~.. J$...;$c i .i-, \ l-s,\ .I, ! II=;\:’ \JLi - - .~. - - - - - - - - - - -. .- ;~~~ RELATIVE COMPACTION OG +/ ms9 L ESCOI(MW ELVcl.#EscmooO. CA 92025 743-0809 /$.yT!TN; &/g&&&& .j! @7- Exp. 9/30/89 SAND VOLUME DATA: -. 'i : ':., -, '.~~+f$i;~Hd INITIAL WElGKl- OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE l e7 Q VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOtSTLRE WET WEIGHT DkY WEIGHT a GR. /L?dF * P& OR GR WEIGHT OF WATER -+z % MOISTURE & IN PLACE WET DENSITY A’56 m/CF fl PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTMUM WET DENSI-IY OPTIMUM WRE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY RELATIVE COMPACTION: X UXSTlRE JOHN VERNON PI ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619) 743-8808 - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COKPACTED FILLED GROUND Objective: - Obtain filled ground 'which is uniform and has adequate internal str,ength to support any structures proposed. The method by which this is obtained is described herein. - Preliminary Proceedures: - 1. Permits - Owner shall ascertain the grading permit require- ments of the agency whose jurisdiction covers the land on which the gradj,ile; is to be performed and shall be responsible for complying with them. - 2. Water - An adequate water supply shall be provided so that compaction of filled ground will not be delayed. - 3. Soils Engineer - A soils engineer shall be retained to pro- vide direction in grading, testing for compaction and certification - that the grading complies with grading ordinances and with approved grading plans. Grading: - 1. Clearing and Grubbing - All natural surface which is to be covered by filled ground, excavated or needed for brow ditches, - swales or other grading appurtenances shall be cleared and grubbed. Trees, shrubs and grass, as well as organic overburden shall be removed from the area to be graded. Cleared material may be disposed - of as approved by the local controlling agency. No embankment shall consist of trees, shrubs or other organic material. 2. Natural Ground Preparation - Natural ground shall be excavated - from beneath embankment areas to solid material, the exact depth as determined by the soils engineer. This material shall be brought to proper moisture content and recompacted to not less than 90% - maximum density as determined by A.S.T.II!. D-1557-70. L' 91 L L. F c t t f .7 4 I- - - Any existing recompacted. JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619) 743-8808 fill which has not been certified must be removed and If the slope of the existing ground exceeds 1' vertical in 6’ horizontal, a bench cut level, 10' wide shall be excavated at the toe of the fill. This will allow the embankment to be placed on a horizontal base for more uniform com~paction. 3. Embankment Placement - Fill material should consist of native or imported material which has been brought to the optimum moisture content. Material to be used for embanlanents may have rocks with diameters greater than 12" providing they are evenly distributed in the soil mixture and are at least 3’ below finish grade. Fill slopes shall not consist of, nor be founded on, large rocks. Although rocks may be placed alon{; the outside of the toe of the fill slopes. Rock placement in embankments shall be under direct supervision of the soils engineer, Embankment material shall be placed in layers varying from 60, to 12" deep depending on soil type, and compacted by suitable compact- ive effort to a density of not-less than 90-I of the maximum density as determined by A.S.T.P. D-1557-70. Koisture content and depth of layers shall be determined by the soil engineer at the time of grading, and shall be updated whenever emban)onent soil types change. As the embankment increases in elevation new benches shall be cut into original ground. Eenches shall be at least 6' horizontally into natural ground, be level and shall occur at intervals to be determined by the soils engineer at the time of grading. Compaction may be obtained by the use of any combination of equip- ment which will result in an embankment that is properly compacted, uniform in moisture and properly finished to the lines and grades shown on the plans or to those set forth i!1 the applicable grading ordinance. 4. Additional Grading - Cut slopes shall be cut to the lines and grades as shown on the plans or set forth in the applicable grading ordinance. 01’ ITV DWRLDIYEWT ~~ME~RI a*. :m*o l IOILI~~sll** . ,““YC”,IIO (2) .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHN VERNON 61 ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619) 743-8808 DECEMBER 31, 1985 SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION 1400 FLAME TREE LN. CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ATTN : PAUL LADD PRELIMINARY SOILS UPDATE MR. LADD: THIS IS TO GERIFY’THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE CONDITIONS OF THE SOILS GRADING REPORT FOR SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION DATED g/16/81 WHICH IS ENCL’OSED. THE CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO BE SIMILAR AND THIS CERTIFICATION SHOlJLD BE CONSIDERED AN lJPDATE TO THE CIJRRENT DATE. jlisLz/- JOHN E. VERNON R.C.E. 21121 ENCLOSURE JOtiN VERNON & ASSOCb%TES I 1859 S. ESCONOIDO BLVD. ESCOND,liiO. CA 92Oi5 TEL. (7141 743:8806 GRADING REPORT .- -. .~ .- - 2 - - - - - - Agency Project Location Lcv. 2TscA4- &be&/ Afix>eH Name of Permittee dA4.2/ Grading Permit No. z/z- 3 A. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. B. 1. 2. 3. C. 1. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH GRADING PLAN AND PERMIT Was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate lo- YeszNo - cations designated on the rading plan as areas to be filled? Did the quantity of fill material placed approximately Yes c/No conform to the grading plan? -- Did the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet the prescribed property line setback (1.5' for fill1 3.0’ Yes= No- for cuts)? Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2 hor- YeseNo- isontal to 1 vertical? If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, were the cuts made in the proper location and to the proper YesE No- the grading plan? LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF COMPACTION TESTS Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location and relative elevation for all compaction tests? Yesg No- Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one test in each 2' thick lens of compacted material. YesE No- As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction YesY No test results, Was the fill, excluding the top l.O', compacted - to at least 90% of maximum dry density? QUALITY OF FILL~COMPACTION OPERATION Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of YesyNo - brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompacted fill or debris and related items? Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at YesKNow 3’ or more below finish grade? Duplicate of DPL #73 Rev. 3-7-79 (1) -. e you attached a copy of your curve showing the rela- Yese ‘NO- - ,lonship between optimum moisture content and maximum density? 4. was all material used as fill (earth, rocks, gravel) YesI/ No smaller than 12" in size? - - ._ 5. Are all areas of the fill suitable for support of structures? Yes&/ No- -j. Were all existing fills on the site recompacted in accord- Yesk No ante with the provisions of the grading ordinance? - 9. STATISTICAL DATA ~, Dates the grading work was performed: H-19 ET- 314 8/ .I, Dates your representative was on site and number of hours on site fos each date, and name of representative; u9 - 3 SAfS 40 .- E, AS-BUILT DATA - . If the fill placement was not in accordanbe with the YesY No approved grading plan. did you notify the permittee to - - obtain approval for deviation from the plan before pro- '- ceeding wit L, If the app&~~%$$&&!%%?~eflect. the actual location, depth and type of fill, have you submitted for Yesk/ No - ~- review and apurovel an as-built plan? I hereby certify. under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in this certification is true to the best of mY knowledce and belief. v&&Z &L&&z Datep-AS-& :5 ir:r,a ture R.C.E. 2621 PROPERTYDEVELOPhQWTENGINEER.S JOHNVERNONQASSOCIATES 1959S.I"sicondi&Blvd. -do. CA 92025 ,-,,fyt; ;; DI'L $73 - - (2) - - JOHN VERNON a ASSOC. m-ava~oIwLRR DATE: ~3- /9- S/ bsa s. LSCQOOQ rLvo.lr~o. CAw~g TESTED BY LO~TIO~ / s/i A%‘&-, %&v/~d m 4- L39s m&b+ & 9-8 -~ - - -_ - - - -~, - ..- SAND VOLUME DATA: lNlTiAL WEIGHT OF SAND A?%?5 LB MIGHT OF RESIDUE /5x LB WEIGHT OF SAND USED cm/ SAND DfINSiTY Bzs WY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE ./.a4 Q VOL. OF CONE . CF VOL. OF HOLE -O&6 w EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT G& GR .gfd LB DRY WEIGHT 453 m WEIGHT OF WATER 45 GR 45 QR % MOISTURE /o /b IN PLACE WET DENSITY /.zz -3 WCF lN PLACE DRY DENSITY /z/2-3 L%F IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MXTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY RELATlVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: \ TESTII / a REL~ATIVE COMPACTION :: ; G TESTREPORT - - - - - ..- .-. - -. TESTU Z COMPACTION ‘0: + g REPORT JOHN VERNON 6 ASS PROmRTY ORVLLOMCT omlmcns DATE: g.7~. -8/ un s. LSColcmo l LV&c-0, CAsls~~ TEGTk w, :+iiii RV ’ LOCAJ-I()N: c5ci-k A@$*24 SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WEIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE a CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE ’ EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY A?zF LB 44g IQ 9A ~G.S%:FB .//Y CF .a& CF ,879 CF IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE 56, GR ~fG.sLB 5&o GR 455 GR 495 CR 45 GR Z% GR /o /z- /,%% LB/CF /// LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MolSTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY RELATIVE COMPACTION: X WfSTlRRE REMARKS: TEST* 3 RELATIVE COMPACTION - 4- 2 +9 TEST REPORT - JOHN VERNON a it3Soc. moPcRYY avcLoPmw OIUILRS DATE: g-*-8/ lsu Y. CYCOOOO SLV~CrcacooO, CAse~~ TESTED BY - - - ,~- - - - - - - - - - .~- - - LOCATION: i5dt.a &%5/&7 SAND VOLUME DATA: INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN MCE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY lr.4 PLACE DRY DENSITY 550 GR 23% LB 530 GR 4!55sA z3zGi s GR <S-i% GR /sz /% /a%? LE/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: e?? LB fz, sLB/CF ./it e CF CF - .- - .- .- -. .- - - - - .- .~ - .- - .- - FT” 3A COMPACTION OG +z REPORT $B-N~EfiW~MS -IIS c DATE: 8~ &- 2?/ I# ¶. cscQo*w) DLVn4~0, c’,;“,;g TESTED BY LOCAJ-ION: 52 &%eb SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY /+zo LB T fz,s%F ./c?? CF .&e CF IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE 520 GR z%& LB 5j3@ a +gz 425 GR /a //z LB/CF /&Z LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: ,n OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % g OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY % E RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: -. - - - ..~ .- - .- - - - .- - - - -- - TEST* -f RELATIVE COMPACTION ‘0: + z TEST REPORT SAND VOLUME DATA: INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND &EIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT Of WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY HI PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY OPTIMUM tvXX3TURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY OHN VERNON 0 ASSOC. MOPERYY mvnrrmrr oolmzR8 DATE: ~3e Z/-f/ I# ¶. csc- rLvo.se-o, cb.nbn~g TESTED By LOCATION: z&ix &bG &&&?A IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE -GA &Uw 55 a3 - &?5 QR 5% QR # QR /s /s //F L%CF /07 Le/CF I RELATIVE COMPACTION : n kx& m REMARKS: - .- - - - - - ,- - - - - - .,- - - TEST# 5 COMPACTION ‘0: + 9” REPORT LCZATIONi~ Ad’- A%&/& SAND VOLUME DATA: INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND MElGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. Of HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PIJICE 7&f, LB m,y LB/CF OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT -GR &5&U B GR DRY WEIGHT 4-45~ 4@5 GR WEIGHT OF WATER +;s GR =i% GR % MOISTURE /2 /z- IN PLACE WET DENSITY lN PLACE DRY DENSITY /f& LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: . RELATIVE COMPACTION ‘0: + ; TESTREPORT - - -. - I# s. LICcmoo rLv~c~0, CAW~B” LOCATION: s&&g& &kltjd SAND VOLUME DATA: - INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND LB !&EIGHT OF RESIDUE 5297 LR - WEIGHT OF SAND USED A?&7 LB SAND DENSlTY xz$ LB/CF - VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE */a., CF VOL. OF COf!4E aa CF , cJ&T CF .- VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT 5.k~ GR z&F LB +d GR DRY WEIGHT f.6 a 43s GR -~ WEIGHT OF WATER 55 GR 45 GR % MOISTURE /2 /s IN PLACE WET DENSITY f/f LE/CF lN PLACE DRY DENSITY /e LB/CF - IMPACT TEST DATA: - OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % - OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION: - REMARKS: - - - - - -- - - - - - h.:: JOHN VERNON 8 &sO(- aomTY mvcLoP=aY cnsulccl a i-s \ DATE: X-29-~/ Iuo s. csc- rLv~trcaroc0. CAW~,’ ’ LOC&‘j-ION: &A A&&-/;/K SAND VOLUME DATA: lNlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY r-4 PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MolSTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY /45’s LB LR 94w LB 785 cB/CF *//7 CF 090 CF :077 CF IN FLACE OPT.. MOISTURE $+ GR l-0 /& -- LG/CF /297 Le/CF RELATIVE COMPACTION: XMOtSTWtE - REMARKS:, - - - .- .- - - -- - - RELATIVE COMPACTION ()G + z TESTREPORT Ima s. ~csconmoo BLvQlc- o,c* 92025 74YOOoE LOCATION: z$~~g>b- 62 SAND VOLUME DATA: INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND WEIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN f=lACE Fe5 m5 4,” , /o+ CF /3Qo CF eO64 CF OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT i%hGR zmI-0 +GR DRY WEIGHT 4+5 Q3 y-455 GR WEIGHT OF WATER 25 GR d-5 GR % MOISTURE /o IN PLACE WET DENSITY /// LG/CF IN PLACE DRY DENSITY /& Le/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MolSTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: - TEST# 9 COMPACTION ‘0: + ; REPORT &Pk .- - .-~ .- -- - - .~ - - .- . JOHN VERNON a ASS PaOmnTY owawwwf oamms DATE: 8rZ? -8/ I# Y. LsCamoo l LvRmccmooo, c”,mg TESTED By * LOCATION: &&/iv~& SAND VOLUME DiTA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED /fl.m LB SAND DENSlTY 82-5 LBkF VOL. OF HOLES CONE /CT/ 1” * VOL. OF CONE . @a CF VOL. OF HOLE , &Q/ CF EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT /A23 L0 5&u GR DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER 4% GR % MOISTURE /. /& IN PLACE WET DENSITY //%/ 5 Le/CF tN PLACE DRY DENSITY /02;J’ Le/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY OPTIMUM MOlSTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION: XMOfSTtRE REMARKS: - .- -. ;;ST* 10 COMPACTION OG + 2 REPORT - JOHN VERNON 0 ASSOC. MOURTY ocvaocyIcI Emoucnt DATE: 8 ~27 + 8/ I# * cNx@lmOo l LV~K~O. c*,;;tB” TESTED BY LOCATIO,N: isiv /+-‘~~si~~ .~. d&-ii dad - .- .-. - .- ,- SAND VOLUME DATA: INlTlAL WEIGHT OF SAND NIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE Ef CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE. EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY tN PLACE DRY DENSITY iMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY OPTIMUM MolSTURE % ~OPTIMUM DRY DENSlTY IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE /, 2; :“, 9.03 LB 32,5 %F t ci CF #Qo CF .&4 CF ~- RELATIVE COMPACTION: S=9 GR grs LB 5-a GR 440 GR 455 GR do GR 45 GR H /o /z/ LE/CF /,$& L%F’ T-2 MOISTWE REMARKS:, - .~~.. - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - .- - - - - FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers I I I .A_ “A .A_ “A le” I a/ I - - 2=&Y - _.._ .__- _.._ .__- Pe I v - ‘-I .“=.,“” .“=.,“” - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - RASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers 5w7 / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4-N /l-/3 /4 - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRACFR R. ACCt-lClATFC rnnca,,+inn ~nnin,,.-.rr I r I I I I I 1 I I I I ! , / I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - -~ FRASER & ASSOCIATES. Consultina Enaineers 4= A5-n, P2f =+,.5” 44, = 5x-6%, WH/cw .a- g~z%‘Ez+ 4.-c% ,/ 65 %, -co &~ALS-~D 4 z 2 S ” - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers 7z9l 77/K&f c-dfvC&N/z?..7M/v yh%/. + 226h’ii-Y = //..76/w+‘. - FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers e-0 --A , -- - .- ._. - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - -- EA...” ,w *o 7 L”*JLCT y*I& FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers - -- .- - T - - - - ..- - - - I = 7,446, /J @cd -a6+f= ~,37 /pc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / ,&x/r7 n-/ “x2 f n &?ze c5%!s/:/ CBci3 , /---- /8 ‘p CM=, s = . -7-w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers .47/&N : fl c d. dzy 3, .z d, U438 p= 9 += 6.375 Y= 6. 74 fq4EC - - .- - - - - - - - - RASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers L57PwP - A? = &A74 s = J. +.a/ /2= g 4” 5 - r A. 37x I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I IATIONAL MJ2l'hc~ OF CALCULATION FOG SHEET ft OF ~ ZONE FRBQIJENCY /d yf, CHECKED BY DATE , I I I I I I I I RATIONAL METHOD OF CALCULATION FORE1 PROJECT ZONE FREQUENCY fl@. I I I I I I 1 / I I I I I I I Sheet & of Calculated by z. 2-k Date 3-B-s Checked by Date I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \TIONAL M?ZTRc OF CALCULATION FORM SHEET OF Cm"LnmD By ,L?s-P g-E .~-,~: <OJECT INE FREQUENCY /@?$i CHECKED BY DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRASER & ASSOCIATES. Consultina Enaineers -- - - _- - - - .- - - - .- -- - - -~ - ,- - - _- - - -_ - - _~. IASER & ASSOCIATES, Consulting Engineers ,cd “0. --E-- LYWLCT -sFi--7iirEx - - - - - -. -.. - - - - - - -- - - ERACER 9. ACC,-,ClATCC r,~nc.,,,+i..n cnn:..nnrr CU YDS STAl g[Q :k!b STR2 ARER=118;28 VOL=22.45 TOTS VOL=22.45 RRER=lBB. 68 WY 5152.88 TOf VOL=849.75 CU YDS STAl EL-D-? %W EL”D=? ‘5j:$i EL*D=? Sk 2: EL^D=? 99:2! ENTER- RUN ENTER; .: ENTER* : R.UN ; E”+tI; : ENTER* ’ RUN ENTE h RN FI ENTER” RUN ENTER* RUN j ENTE * RN B RUN RUN STR2 iLAD=? Ei^l)=? e. ee sag; RUN