HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 82-05A; Telescope Point; Soils Report; 1984-05-18- F WI c/+-J-
c-r BZ-sfj
c-l- -Id-15
FINAL COMPACTION AND GRADING REPORT FOR LOTS%-5, 56-65, 117-139, FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: PORTION OF TRACT 86-5; "TELESCOPE POINT" PROJECT IN CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
CONDUCTED FOR:
WESTANA BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS 4241 JUTLAND DRIVE, #25 ,SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92117
W.O. 407004 MAY 18. 1984
e-L-a IYIY GEOTECHNICAL ~:c~~-Y~ -TN. 5 _ . ..&J~..c, ..-r,~:A_.N ~-,~..::~+k-,-‘-iiuCiT: P’
1984 W.O. 407004 Y-'
kia Builders/Developers '.~utland Drive, $25
'Diego, California 92117
Subject: Final Compaction and Grading Report for Lots l-5, 56-65, 117-139, for Residential Development; Portion of Tract 86-5; "Telescope Point" Project in Carlsbad, Californ
.,rwarded herewith is the Compaction Report on the above referenced
kroject. The results of the compaction tests are shown on Table I.
kocations of the tests are shown on the accompanying plot plan.
Laboratory Standard: (ASTM:D-1557-70) 4 inch dia. mold; l/30 cu.ft.vol.; 5 layers - 25 blows per layer 10 lb. hammer dropped 18 inches
Classification Optimum 'Moisture Z Max. Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.
VI
XII
xxv
SAND, silty, BROWN
SAND, RED/BROWN
SAND, clayey, silty
SAND, silty, clayey, TAN
CLAY, silty, BROWN/ BLACK
SAND, clayey, WRITE/ TAN
SAND, BLACK
CLAYSTONE, LIGHT BROWN
10.5
10.5
11.0
12.0
16.0
~11.5
16.5
14.0
124.5
125.0
125.0
119.5
113.0
124.0
108.0
117.0
The grading operation was conducted from February 21, 1984 through
April 9, 1984. Supervision was provided during this period.
1630-C South Sunkist St., Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 6342092
,ia
ior to the placement of fill soils,- all vegetation and debris was
ioved from the site. The existing loose surficial soils were
cavated to competent material. The exposed surface was scarified,
isture conditioned and recompacted to ninety (90%) percent of the
boratory Standard.
/. e fill soils were placed in six (6") inch lifts, moisture conditioned
d compacted in a like manner.
key was constructed at the toe of the~fill slopes to provide support
r the fill. The existing slopes were properly benched during
nstruction.
me native soil classifies as SANDSTONE, and is suitable for the support I: of the fill and the proposed structures.
e c Compaction was obtained by 633 Scrapers, 824 Rubber Tire Dozer. A
water truck was used for moisture control.
'Ihe relative compaction percent was determined by the Sand Cone Method
(ASTM:D-1556-70). These tests were taken a minimum of every 500 cubic
yards placed and every two (2') feet in depth of fill placed.
Expansion indexes were determined in accordance with Section 29 of the
U.B.C. 1978 edition. Results are as follows:
Lot Expansion Expansion No. 's 'Index Potential
l-5 23 Low
56-65 20 Low
120-121 20 Low
' 122-132 28 Low
132-139 30 Low
Froposed structures shall be supported by isolated and continuous
ead footings placed a minimum depth of twelve (12") inches below
P est ,adjacent finish grade utilizing a recommended safe bearing
ze of 2600 pounds per square foot and 2100 pounds per square foot,
; ectively. This value is for dead plus live load and may be
raased by one-third (l/3) for total including seismic and wind
ds where allowed by code. Increases in bearing capacity for
B‘ me-eases in footing dimensions are tabulated below:
Minimum Minimum Bearing Depth Width 'Value (inches) (inches) (psf)
Increase Depth Width
(psf/ft)(psf/ft)
Maximum
rs, !Continuous 12 12 2100 314 109 4100
'Isolated 12 12 2600 314 105 4200
Footings which span from native material to compacted fill shall be
--reinforced with a minimum of one (1) 05 bar top and bottom to control
potential differential movement. Reinforcing bars shall extend a
i minimum of ten (10') feet on either side of transition line. L f '~ I. I., Footings placed on or adjacent to slope's shall have a minimum horizontal
distance of five (5') feet from the edge of the footings to the face
of the slope.
Footings should not be poured until authorization to do so has been
obtained from the Building Inspector. Excavations may be made and
forms set before approval of the report at the owner's risk.
I hereby certify that the subject grading was supervised by me and the
work was done in full compliance with the Grading Ordinance of the City
of Carlsbad and in accordance with best accept.ed practices and the
applicable chapter of the U.B.C.
REGULATORY'COMPLIANCE
All cuts, fills or processing of original ground under the purview of
this report have been completed under the inspection of and with
selective testing by ACTION GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, and found to
'in compliance with the Grading Code of the City of Carlsbad. The
spleted work has been reviewed and is considered adequate for the
Ielopment now planned. Our findings were made and recommendations
k repared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineer
b,ctices, and no further warranty is implied nor made.
r his report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for
lhis project.
e appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
TRespectfully submitted:
iACTION GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
BRUCE A. PACKARD RCE 13801 VICE PRESIDENT - ENGINEERING STAFF GEOLOGIST'
TH:ss
.-
-
-
-
-
-
.-
.-
-
-
i ! : i
:/ ;I4
,::
1 i,, / 1 I ; !
,/ :
14,
i
EEA
$4-w &VP WO”” OIDE”:
4-a 706)/
11
I LOCATIQli OF COMPACTION TESTS I '
X = COMPACTION TEST
PREPARED FOR
/ld t57m4h
E:F . . . a’,, ..yN 5 ‘” ;.L,. T,, A:;,N ,:mj
TABLE I
ACTICIN w-o. 4oii?@f
ENGINEERING
~COIISUVA-
m TABLE I
c
DATE OF
TEST
a -GY-89
#2&kw
‘f
I#
‘f
za7d?u/
3-/-83/
*
$-f-lW
If
f/
3-/6-&?q
If
//-ACTION W.O.@7Dl9v
LLL/ ENGINEERING c E-CONSUY-~
TEST NO. LOCATION
DEPTH OF TESTS BELOW FINISH
GRADE (FT.)
MOISTURE (PERCENT)
60 619
ENGlNEERING -c-nm
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (LBSJCU. FT.)
//SO
//x
//m
0 //f.
//$O
/Y&-.0
-.-..A29
//7 0
/I!!/
//CL
//6.0
//54
/I70
//to
/!G 8 I 91
TABLE I
w.0. qo7oM
DRY UNIT WEIGHT
TABLE I
w.o. $297~
BELOW FINISH
: ACTION LLL/ ENGINEERING
I
RELATIVE DATE OF COMPACTION TEST
93 49-8f
?/ 0
73 II
90 II
90 II
9/ II
9’0 ‘t
95 I8
I
TABLE I
w.“. 407ooy
-
-
-.
-
-
-
-
-.
-
ENGINEERING
OtEt-C-TAMS
June 22, 1984 W.O. 407004-A
Westma Builders and Developers 4241 Jutland Drive, Suite 215 %I Diego, California 92117 Subject: Addendm to Grading Inspection and Compaction Report, Dated May 18, 1984, Work Order Nnrber 407004
Gentlemen:
At your request, we have reviewed the Cuqaction Report for the referenced project.
tit lots 6,7,8, were inadvertently left out of the Campaction Report. These lots
shawed adequate ccmpsction, and low expansion potential. Footing recamzndations
made in the referenced Compaction F&port remain valid.
We appreciate this opportmity to be of service to you.
Respectfully subitted:
s;72m
SCAFFGEOILmsT BFUICE A. PACKARD RCE 13801 VICE PRESIDENT - m-
- n-I:sim
-
1630-G South Sunk&it St.. Anaheim. Ca. 92606 (213) 652-4710 (714) 634.2092