HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 83-19; CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE T; COMPACTION OF DESILTING BASIN BACKFILL; 2000-08-0919
Geotechnical • Geologic' Environmental
f
5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931.0915
September 8, 2000
W.O. 2832-C-SC
McMillin Companies
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, California
Attention: Mr. Don Mitchell
Subject: compaction Report of Desilting Basin Backfill (Lots 177 through 179 and
322) and Finish Grading of Lots 186 and 189 through 192, Calavera Hills,
Village T North, Carlsbad Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad, California
Reference: Report of Rough Grading; Calavera Hills, Village "r North, Lots. 163
Through 343, and Open Space Lots 344 through 361 and 363, Carlsbad
Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad, California," W.O. 2393-B-SC, dated January 14,
1999, by GeoSoils, Inc.
Dear Sir:
Grading and processing of original ground within the building pad areas for the Subject lots
was observed and selectively tested by a representative of GeoSoils, Inc. during the
earthwork phase of development for the subject property.
The work performed Is In general conformance with the recommendations and methods
presented In our referenced report, and with the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad,
California. Field testing indicates that fills placed under the purview of this rport have
been compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Earth materials used to
till the desilting basins and bring lots to grade consisted of silty sands derived fom footing
trench spoils and finish lot pulls generated from other areas within Calavera Hills Village
T North. This material is very low to low expansive (El. <31) and has a negligible sulfate
exposure to concrete '(see the attached Table 1). Copies of field density- testing leports are
Included with this report for review. Observation and testing services were proiided on an
on call basis, as requested by the contractor. Additional site specific lot conditions are
presented in our referenced report dated January 14, 1999 and are presented herein on
the attached Table 1.
Since our study is based upon observations and selective testing, the conclusions
presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in
accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied.
Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GeoSoils, Inc. asSumes no
responsibility or liability for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by
others.
The opportunity to be of service Is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions
concerning this report or If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact any of the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted, . G.zo
GeoSolls, inc. r No. 19 Reviewed by:
Robert G. Ci Crisman CA Albert R Kleist
Engineering. Geologist, CEG 1934 . Geotechnical Engineer, GE 476
RGC/ARKJJPF/mo . . . . .R.
Attachment: 'Table 1 - Lot Characteristics '
.
. 476
Field Testing Reports .
rp.O5-3D-Ol
Distribution: (4) Addressee '
.
..
McMillin Companies W.O. 2832-C-SC -
Calavera Hills, Village T North ' . . . . SepleInber B. 2000
Fe:e:\wp7280O2632c.o Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc. S
'5-
0• LOT CHARACTERISTICS
LOT
#0
EXPANSION
INDEX (per
UBC
standard
EXPANSION
POTENTIAL'
SOLUBLE
SULFATE
(PPM)
18-2)
SULFATE :
EXPOSURE
0000
DEPTH OF
FILL
(RANGE
IN Fl)
FOUNDATION
CATEGORY
_
177 22 ' Low
0
70 Negligible
___
12-21
__
—_II
178 22 , Low ' 70 Negligible 12-21
-
II
179 22 Low 70 Negligible ' —_13-21 II
186 30 Low ' 85 Negligible 15-26 II
189 25 Low '50 Negligible 12-25
-
Ii
190 25 Low"' 50 Negligible 12-26 0
191 25 Low , 50 Negligible 1D-25 U
192 25 , Low 50 Negligible 4-21
-
II PT
322 10 , Very Low 10 Negligible 47-58. HI PT
Per Table 18-I-13 of the Uniform Building Code (1997 ed.) , H
(2) Per Table 19-A-4 of the Uniform Building Code (l 997 ad-) 0
Foundations should be constructed in acoordance with recommendations for the specific' categories
noted above and presented in Table 3 of the referenced report. .
FIELD. TESTING REPORT
DATE
NAME OA)
HOURS_''
CLIENT -ILIL-.. TRACT - LOCATION _C4?j 74p
SUPT _ - CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT
TEST
NO. LOCATION
ELEV.
OR
DEPTH
MOISTURE
CONTENT
DRY
DENSITY
P.C.F.
RELATIVE i
COMPACTION
TEST
TYPE
SOIL
TYPE
pJ /
,cJe1. 'Vp -h-
—ii- I/b1 -:1i
10 we ö 136 ho A Q•
-COMMENTS:
GeoSolls, Inc.
PAGE
OF _
E:/wptforma ,Meldtst.wpd 0 GeoSo Us, Inc.
FIELD -TESTING REPORT
w.O. -3-Sc
DATE
NAME 7N
HOURSL
CLIENT Md1 ii. ThACT__2) LOCATION________
SIJPT.____________________ CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT
J 1d\
TEST
NO.
. .
LOCATION
ELEV..
OR
DEPTH
MOISTURE
CONTENT
-
DRY
DENSITY
P.C.F.
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
TEST
TYPE
SOIL
TYPE
r 1o1 272 \5 A \O _ O - N
Z72 flO T5 - N
3 L t ,
.
•
ye
6 ;r.h..c_•• _
• • GeoSoils, Iflc.
BY:'
PA cE _£. OF_I
E/wp/Torms/fieILst.wpd GeoSolls, Inc. .
OF./
FIELD TLSTING REPORT
W.O.
DATE _igZ-7t1
NAME
HOURS_
CLIENT_ TRACT Ji LOCATION
SUPT. _- CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT -613 L I(fl / &'ib PAr
H- hIIe1 RELATIVE
ION
TYPE
-
--
--
m WKE om 9,3109A I-
I ml
_
WAR 9."- -.9.9 FM
mm
WE "IN j
Alm
--- mm
COMMENTS:
1 7 "S
E:/wpItorms/fte1dts.wpd
GeoSoils, Inc.
DATE
W.O.
:-7-77
NAME
HOURS 7 0
MEMO
5741 PALMER WAY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
(760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 831-0915 0
0
CLI ENT I'7f'T TRACT _
•0
LOCATION 4'3o
SUPT_- 808 0 CONTRACTOR
0 jot- I2.. 4i€€- pic.4tyJ
rl
f: 7_I
3) cctt>fe ;: I 0
Inc.
E:wp/formimmosantwpd - GIOSOiL, Inc.-
FIELD TESTING REPORT
W.O.
DATE 7-7 NAME_
HOURS.
CLIENT TRACT - LOCATION________
SUPT_V CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT '-F F
LOCATION
ELg,
1~
MOISTURE
CONTENTj~
DW
DENSITY
%
RELATIVE
-
I
aii
WAA
Pk
COMMENTS: _4 i4/r ti io1 h,.eei.-, ic44il
//y5 7 9 -/J "5-;
-
GeoSolls, Inc.
PAGE OF -
E:/wp/rormIfdt8Lwpd
GeoSoils, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
CLIENT_2- c-kt-- c• (1 TRACT I -1 117- LOCAT
SUPT 02. - CONTRACTOR _
EQUIPMENT I
E
LOCATION CONTENT
_
MOISTURE
COMPACTION
~- M~m
- I-
Jill r m—
ff- d No- Old I I Wm- Co me co-'s
- - -
_________
_
_
-p--
COMMENTS:
e-,7 ,L e- cze
Az j k,
LI4W9/V1I5 4u1/ BY:
.* PAGE______ OF _(
E;!wpflorm&feIdIat.wpd
GeoSo Us, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
DATE ,--??
fl NAME 47 .,
HOURS_
CLIENT TRACT_R3-11 - LOCATION____A 4- di
SUPT. - CONTRACTOR r -
EQUIPMENT
TESTIF
NO. LOCATION
DRY
DEN SITY RELATI`Vb~
MEN .4m,
ME" ow.., T"
VAN W
W W M ...P. W-M _U
-- -
COMMENTS: .. ..
GeoSolls, ,ngp
-
BY:
/ PAGE__________ OF_________
E:/wpflormoldtsLwpd Geosof is, inc. .
'S
FIELD TESTING REPORT
W.O.jt.7/(J
DATE_ "-17
NAME _________
KOURS_. .c
CLIENT TRACT__________ LOCATION_______
SUPT_____________________ CONTRACTOR f
EQUIPMENT
V /Imm 7 jlJg,1fr..
COMPACTIO
-
COMMENTS:
-
GenSoils, Iflc..
BY:
PAGE OF OF....Z
E:Iwp/tumWfleIdtStWPd GeoSoils, Inc.