HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 83-19; CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE T; COMPACTION REPORT OF DESILTING BASIN BACKFILL; 2000-09-08crc-3--I?
Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental
5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931.0915
September 8, 2000
W.O. 832-C-SC
McMillin Companies 3
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, California
Attention: Mr. Don Mitchell
Subject: Compaction Report of Desilting Basin Backfill (Lots 177 through T797and
322) and Finish Grading of Lots 186 and 189 through 192, Cal*vera Hills,
Village T North, Carlsbad Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad. California
Reference: TMReport of Rough Grading, Calavera Hills. Village "T" North Lots 163
Through 343, and Open Space Lots 344 through 361 and 363, Carlsbad
Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad, California," W.O.2393-B-SC, dated January 14,
1999, by GeoSoils, Inc.
Dear Sir: 3
Grading and processing of original ground within the building pad area for the Subject lots
was observed and selectively tested by a representative of GeoSoils, Inc. during the
earthwork phase of development for the subject property.
The work performed Is In general conformance with the recommendations and methods
presented In our referenced report, and with the grading ordinance of the City ot Carlsbad,
California. Field testing indicates that fills placed under the purview of this rOport have
been compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Earth materials used to
fill the desilting basins and bring lots to grade consisted of silty sands derived fiom footing
trench spoils and finish lot pulls generated from other areas within Calavera Hills Village
T North. This material is very low to low expansive (.l. <31) and has a negligible sulfate
exposure to concrete (see the attached Table 1). Copies of field densitytestingeports are
Included with this report for review. Observation and testing services were pro1ided on an
on call basis, as requested by the contractor. Additional site specific lot conditions are
presented in our referenced report dated January 14, 1999 and are presented herein on
the attached Table 1.
Since our study is based upon observations and selective testing, the conclusions
presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in
accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed Or implied.
Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GeoSoils, Inc. asSumes no
responsibility or liability for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by
others.
The Opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. if you have any ::,questions
concerning this report or If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact any of the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc. ( cc No
0 EXP.
.
\9 Robert G Crisman P CMS
Enginedng Geologist, CEG 1934
RGC/AHK/JPF/mo
Attactment: Table 1 - Lot Characteristics
Field Testing Reports
Reviewed by:
L
Albert R. Kleist
Geotechnical Engineer. GE 476
EL
No. 476
p. O8-3O1
Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.
TABLE 1
LOT CHARACTERISTICS
LOT EXPANSION EXPANSION SOLUBLE SULFATE. DEPTH OF FOUNDATION
#. INDEX (per POTENTIAL' SULFATE EXPOSURE'S' FILL. CATEGORY
UBC (ppm) (RANGE
tandard IN Fr.)
15-2)
177 22 Low 70 Negligible 12-21 II
-
178 22 Low 70 Negligible 12-21
179 22 Low —__70 Negligible 13-21 If
-
186 30 Low 85 Negligible 15-26 II
-
189 25 Low 50 Negligible 12-25 II
-
190 25 Low 50 Negligible 12-26 If
191 25 Low
-
50 Negliqib 10-25
192 25 Low 50 Negligible 4-21 If PT
-
322 10 Very Low 10 Negligible 47-58 E Ill PT
Per Table 18-i-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997ed.)
' Per Table 19-A-4 of the Uniform Building Code (1997 ad.)
Foundations should be constructed in accordance with recommendations for the apecfficcategorlas
noted above and presented in Table 3 of the referenced report.
GeoSoils, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
W.O. -. B -
DATE
NAME r3)J
HOURS¶1
CLIENT_/1ME1) - TRACT 3 J - LOCATION_C4?2LJ li4P
SUPT._ CONTRACTOR _'T
EQUIPMENT
TEST
NO. LOCATION
ELEV.
OR
DEPTH
MOISTURE
CONTENT
DRY
DENSITY
P.C.F.
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
TEST
TYPE
SOIL
TYPE
- D1,4..veS iea'waJ P fi3ea /
A/o
22' (82.. - 6110
ne c i
nje a/ _____ • _______ _________ _____ ______
COMMENTS:
0
GeoSoils Inc
PAGE OF
E:fw/fie1dtst.wpd GeoSofls, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
W.O. -t-C ..1a5
DATE :3 -3 -
NAME 5V
HOURS 4.
CLIENT _MeMill; -3______ -TRACT _2-I9 LOCATION CJ..ID
SUPT, SOB CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT
TEST
NO. LOCATION
ELEV.
OR
DEPTH
MOISTURE
CONTENT
DRY
DENSITY
R.C.F.
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
TEST
TYPE
SOIL
TYPE
22-. k5A XCPL S 0r0
2fl. %J J! T35 N.
GeoSoils, Thc
BY:___
PAGf" £ OF I
E/wpITorms/flekltstwpd CeoSolls, Inc.
FIELD TLSTING REPORT
W.O. jtce-/3-S
DATE_
NAME_____________
HOURS_____________
CIJENT TRACT 'I /Il)4 LOCA
SUPT - CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT __3 6/3 ' / - /
(MI1C-,
MOISTURE
CONTENT
%
RELATIVEI
A~MWI •
__
__ V -V --
__ --
I "ff A pwdjm W, em, M - 'Win
JM-
JWFVIIMV,~.5
Swim
COMMENTS:
.1/b" IPJL, J / ' / I 7 /lo. / 1 1,
E/wpl?ormslfleldts*.wpd
GeoSoils, Inc.
W.O. ZcC- Sc_
DATE _______________
NAME
HOURS 1.0
MEMO
5741 PALMER WAY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
(760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915
CLIENT TRACT - (7 LOCATION eAdi S13,40
sup,-_/33 CONTRACTOR
JLI I2. 54ic..eA Me..4&f&c._( (' Ikr
P
4;I4-/ fl -If.
-. / *,t C- 7'
fal
GeoSolLs1 I Inc.
EMp/form&memosantwpd 08o, IU4•
FIELD TESTING REPORT
- .........-\
DATE
NAME HOURS
CLIENT TRACT - LOCATION_______
SUPT.:_- CONTRACTOR
F /
EQUIPMENT
LOCATION
M OISTUREJ~
CONTENT7 DENS
DRY
P.0
7
MEMO
-
0 MOM
- p I -
-
IM _
W, Z
COMMENTS:
' 4,
EJwp/form/fia1dtsLwpd
GeosolJs,
BY: ::Qg
PAGE_ (OF
GeoSoils, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
w.o-
DATE NAME
HOURS
CLIENT k TRACT LOCATION
SUPT DA - CONTRACTOR P
EQUIPMENT 4
LOCATION OR DEPTHI
CONTENT
%
RELATIVE
COMPACTION EL
SOIL TYPE
ryI WA mm
Fm F Mo m
____
VN
M—
1I.
IRA
4 riO "A IF m-
-
mm mm
COMMENTS: J2I .
_7- I vle-
k1'i lvt'T, V
(L)WV _•+' /.,_
fr1ff.,_14,_i -k' Ceils, Inc.
BY: i21
fr., _dJ_c(>a .1 PAGE_
A1-
OF J
E:/wpflorm&fieldWtwpd
GeoSoils, Inc.
FIELD TESTING REPORT
DATE
NAME =
HOURS
CLIENT _ TRACT ?3-12 -LOCATION_C-/rLj
SUPT - CONTRACTOR
EQUIPMENT
LOCATION RELATIVE~
COMPACTION
-
9 Wi P.M
-
W l -
COMMENTS:
GeoSoils, jnc.
BY:
PAGE_________ OF_______
E!wpMorrnufloIdtstwpd Geosoils, Inc.
'I..
FIELD TESTING REPORT
W.O. -AG 7t/ r- se
DATE_
NAME_
HOURS_
CLIENT —TRACT_3 I? LOCATION
SUPT_____________________ CONTRACTOR ' f
EQUIPMENT
LOCATION OR
DEPTH
CONTENT
%
RELATIVE
COMPACTICN
ROM
rr
_
I
A,I,IvAur,rWr-
7FE :Zz
COMMENTS: '
Thc.
BY:
PAGE OF —OF
E4Jwp/tomWHeIdt3LWPd GeoSoils, Inc.