Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 83-19; CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE T; COMPACTION REPORT OF DESILTING BASIN BACKFILL; 2000-09-08crc-3--I? Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931.0915 September 8, 2000 W.O. 832-C-SC McMillin Companies 3 2727 Hoover Avenue National City, California Attention: Mr. Don Mitchell Subject: Compaction Report of Desilting Basin Backfill (Lots 177 through T797and 322) and Finish Grading of Lots 186 and 189 through 192, Cal*vera Hills, Village T North, Carlsbad Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad. California Reference: TMReport of Rough Grading, Calavera Hills. Village "T" North Lots 163 Through 343, and Open Space Lots 344 through 361 and 363, Carlsbad Tract 83-19, City of Carlsbad, California," W.O.2393-B-SC, dated January 14, 1999, by GeoSoils, Inc. Dear Sir: 3 Grading and processing of original ground within the building pad area for the Subject lots was observed and selectively tested by a representative of GeoSoils, Inc. during the earthwork phase of development for the subject property. The work performed Is In general conformance with the recommendations and methods presented In our referenced report, and with the grading ordinance of the City ot Carlsbad, California. Field testing indicates that fills placed under the purview of this rOport have been compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Earth materials used to fill the desilting basins and bring lots to grade consisted of silty sands derived fiom footing trench spoils and finish lot pulls generated from other areas within Calavera Hills Village T North. This material is very low to low expansive (.l. <31) and has a negligible sulfate exposure to concrete (see the attached Table 1). Copies of field densitytestingeports are Included with this report for review. Observation and testing services were pro1ided on an on call basis, as requested by the contractor. Additional site specific lot conditions are presented in our referenced report dated January 14, 1999 and are presented herein on the attached Table 1. Since our study is based upon observations and selective testing, the conclusions presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed Or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GeoSoils, Inc. asSumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. The Opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. if you have any ::,questions concerning this report or If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. ( cc No 0 EXP. . \9 Robert G Crisman P CMS Enginedng Geologist, CEG 1934 RGC/AHK/JPF/mo Attactment: Table 1 - Lot Characteristics Field Testing Reports Reviewed by: L Albert R. Kleist Geotechnical Engineer. GE 476 EL No. 476 p. O8-3O1 Page 2 GeoSoils, Inc. TABLE 1 LOT CHARACTERISTICS LOT EXPANSION EXPANSION SOLUBLE SULFATE. DEPTH OF FOUNDATION #. INDEX (per POTENTIAL' SULFATE EXPOSURE'S' FILL. CATEGORY UBC (ppm) (RANGE tandard IN Fr.) 15-2) 177 22 Low 70 Negligible 12-21 II - 178 22 Low 70 Negligible 12-21 179 22 Low —__70 Negligible 13-21 If - 186 30 Low 85 Negligible 15-26 II - 189 25 Low 50 Negligible 12-25 II - 190 25 Low 50 Negligible 12-26 If 191 25 Low - 50 Negliqib 10-25 192 25 Low 50 Negligible 4-21 If PT - 322 10 Very Low 10 Negligible 47-58 E Ill PT Per Table 18-i-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997ed.) ' Per Table 19-A-4 of the Uniform Building Code (1997 ad.) Foundations should be constructed in accordance with recommendations for the apecfficcategorlas noted above and presented in Table 3 of the referenced report. GeoSoils, Inc. FIELD TESTING REPORT W.O. -. B - DATE NAME r3)J HOURS¶1 CLIENT_/1ME1) - TRACT 3 J - LOCATION_C4?2LJ li4P SUPT._ CONTRACTOR _'T EQUIPMENT TEST NO. LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE - D1,4..veS iea'waJ P fi3ea / A/o 22' (82.. - 6110 ne c i nje a/ _____ • _______ _________ _____ ______ COMMENTS: 0 GeoSoils Inc PAGE OF E:fw/fie1dtst.wpd GeoSofls, Inc. FIELD TESTING REPORT W.O. -t-C ..1a5 DATE :3 -3 - NAME 5V HOURS 4. CLIENT _MeMill; -3______ -TRACT _2-I9 LOCATION CJ..ID SUPT, SOB CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT TEST NO. LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY R.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE 22-. k5A XCPL S 0r0 2fl. %J J! T35 N. GeoSoils, Thc BY:___ PAGf" £ OF I E/wpITorms/flekltstwpd CeoSolls, Inc. FIELD TLSTING REPORT W.O. jtce-/3-S DATE_ NAME_____________ HOURS_____________ CIJENT TRACT 'I /Il)4 LOCA SUPT - CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT __3 6/3 ' / - / (MI1C-, MOISTURE CONTENT % RELATIVEI A~MWI • __ __ V -V -- __ -- I "ff A pwdjm W, em, M - 'Win JM- JWFVIIMV,~.5 Swim COMMENTS: .1/b" IPJL, J / ' / I 7 /lo. / 1 1, E/wpl?ormslfleldts*.wpd GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. ZcC- Sc_ DATE _______________ NAME HOURS 1.0 MEMO 5741 PALMER WAY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 CLIENT TRACT - (7 LOCATION eAdi S13,40 sup,-_/33 CONTRACTOR JLI I2. 54ic..eA Me..4&f&c._( (' Ikr P 4;I4-/ fl -If. -. / *,t C- 7' fal GeoSolLs1 I Inc. EMp/form&memosantwpd 08o, IU4• FIELD TESTING REPORT - .........-\ DATE NAME HOURS CLIENT TRACT - LOCATION_______ SUPT.:_- CONTRACTOR F / EQUIPMENT LOCATION M OISTUREJ~ CONTENT7 DENS DRY P.0 7 MEMO - 0 MOM - p I - - IM _ W, Z COMMENTS: ' 4, EJwp/form/fia1dtsLwpd GeosolJs, BY: ::Qg PAGE_ (OF GeoSoils, Inc. FIELD TESTING REPORT w.o- DATE NAME HOURS CLIENT k TRACT LOCATION SUPT DA - CONTRACTOR P EQUIPMENT 4 LOCATION OR DEPTHI CONTENT % RELATIVE COMPACTION EL SOIL TYPE ryI WA mm Fm F Mo m ____ VN M— 1I. IRA 4 riO "A IF m- - mm mm COMMENTS: J2I . _7- I vle- k1'i lvt'T, V (L)WV _•+' /.,_ fr1ff.,_14,_i -k' Ceils, Inc. BY: i21 fr., _dJ_c(>a .1 PAGE_ A1- OF J E:/wpflorm&fieldWtwpd GeoSoils, Inc. FIELD TESTING REPORT DATE NAME = HOURS CLIENT _ TRACT ?3-12 -LOCATION_C-/rLj SUPT - CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT LOCATION RELATIVE~ COMPACTION - 9 Wi P.M - W l - COMMENTS: GeoSoils, jnc. BY: PAGE_________ OF_______ E!wpMorrnufloIdtstwpd Geosoils, Inc. 'I.. FIELD TESTING REPORT W.O. -AG 7t/ r- se DATE_ NAME_ HOURS_ CLIENT —TRACT_3 I? LOCATION SUPT_____________________ CONTRACTOR ' f EQUIPMENT LOCATION OR DEPTH CONTENT % RELATIVE COMPACTICN ROM rr _ I A,I,IvAur,rWr- 7FE :Zz COMMENTS: ' Thc. BY: PAGE OF —OF E4Jwp/tomWHeIdt3LWPd GeoSoils, Inc.