HomeMy WebLinkAboutPR 2.7.4; ELLERY RESERVOIR PROPERTY; ADDITIONAL SOIL STUDIES; 1970-11-05FIR a.71
LA WOOD WARD - CLYDE & ASSOCIATES . . . ..•.
CONSULTING SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINES AND GEOLOGISTS
3467 Kurtz Street November 5, 1970
San Diego ' Project No. 69-263' California 92110 ,
(714) 224-2911 . .
Engineering. Science, Inc. . . ... . .
3260-1/2 Rosecrans Avenue . . .. ..
San Diego, California 92110 . . . .
Attention:. Mr. Richard R. Duesen
ADDITIONAL SOIL STUDIES
ELLERY.RESERVOIR SITE
CITY OF CARLSBAD WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS . . . S ..
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA •. . . . .. . .
In accordance with your request and the recommendations in our soil
investigation report dated November 12, 1969,.we ha.ve investigated the '
subsurface soil. condttions at the subject tank s.ite. . The 'purpose -of
our investigation is to determine the general 'subsurface soil conditions
with particular regard to 'whether variations' exist from those indicated '
.in our previous report. This site'was not drilled during our original
soil ''investigation. .
0 ' "
.Three-test borings were made at the tank. site at the' approximate loca- '
tionsshown'on the Site,Plan, Figure' 1. ' Drilling was done on Augu't
31 , 1970, with a 6-.inch diameter truck-mounted power auger under the -
supervision of an engineering geologist from our firm.' F.ield.boring
logs, were prepared' by the geologist on the' basis. of an examination of
the -samples secured and the excavated material. The Logs of Test: Borings
presented on Figures 2 through 4 are based on an inspection of the
samples', laboratory test results and on the field boring logs.. The
vertical pos-ition of'each sample.is shown on 'the Logs of Test Borings.,
The test boring's were located: in' the 'field with the aid' of' ã plan
entitled, Water System Improvements, City of Carlsbad, Cal-if orni a,
Ellery Reservoir, 5 mg-Site Plan" prepared by Engineering Science, Inc
The soils encountered were visually classified in' the laborato'ry'and '
evaluated with respect to swelling'characteristics, dry density and '
moisture content. .The classification of,a representati-ve sample of a.
clayey soil was substantiated'by grain'si'ze analyses and the'determination , '
of plasticity characteristics. Swelling characteristics of this same I '
soil were determined by a loaded swell test on an undisturbed sample
The results of tests on undisturbed 'samples, except for the loaded', swell
tests, are shown with the penetration resistance of the sampler at the
.corresponding samplle locations on the Logs.of Test Borings.. ' The grain
size distribution 'curves are shown and the plasticity. characteristi.cs . '
are indicated on Figure 5. and the results. of the loaded swell test are
reported on Figure 6
Engineering Science, Inc.
Project No. 69-263 ,
November 5, 1970 . .
Page
As indicated in our preliminary report,the tank will be located on the
top of a north-south oriented beach ridge remnant between the approxi-
mate elevations of 315 to 340 feet, plan datum. The surface of the site
slbpes away gently on both sides. and is covered with dried grasses. :A grove of eucalyptus trees surrounds the site which is currently occupied
by a 70-feet diameter water tank. It was anticipated thro.ugh. a visual inspection of the site that subsurface soil conditions would be similar
to other tanks studied for our preliminary report.
The subsurface soils as revealed, by the test borings in general, consist
of 1/2 to 1-1/2 feet Of loose to medium dense porous silty sand and
topsoil underlai.n by a clayey-sand material which grades downward at
depths of 3-1/2 to 5-1/2, feet into very dense silty sandstone of'Pleis-
tocene age. The latter material' extends. to.the depths explored, a
maximum of approximately 28 feet. The results of laboratory tests
indicate that the' clayey sand material is low in -potential expansiveness;
however, at other tank sites it was revealed that this clayey sand
grades laterally into potentially expansive sandy clay 1enss and pockets.
The sandstone, at depth, is particularly competent and will withstand
relatively high structural 'loads.
An examination of the available plan indicates that the tank on the'
northeast side will be located relatively close to the cut/fill line.
Although none was indicated by'ou'r 'test borings, potentially expansive
sandy ,clay may occur' in pockts along this daylight. line. It will he necessary to undercut these' pockets' and replace with properly, compacted
sandstone or lean concrete mix
The following conclusions and recommendations are essentially those,
presented in our preliminary report and are reiterated here for your
information.
('1) It is recommended that the footings for the tank'
be founded entirely in natural sandstone
Footings founded a minimum, depth of 12 'inches below rough grade in dense sandstone materials may' be des'igned. for' an
allowable, soil' bearing pressure of 6000 pounds per square 'foot
(total load)...
'Porous topsoils. and/or potentiailyexpansivé' soils
may, be 'encountered near the daylight boundary during the grading.
These soils should be removed to 'a depth of 2 feet below-rough
grade and replaced with.a'lean.concr'ete mix.'
As an alternate.-to placing concrete in the.undercut
areas, compacted nonexpansive soil may replace the unsuitable
soils. If this procedure is sel.ected,'it is further, recommended
that the entire interior area be scarified .to a minimum depth of
12 inches and recompacted in. place.
WOOD WARD CLYDE & ASSOCIATES '
Consulting Soil and Foundation Engineers and Geologists
Engineering Science, Inc. S .
Project No. 69-263 . .
November 5, 1970.
Page S
(4) It is recommended that the upper 2 feet of all fill
be composed of properly compacted nonexpansive soil. The clay
soils may be spread in the deeper.parts of the 'fill. *
(5) Proposed cut and fill slopes having maximum heights
in the order of 25 and 20 feet, respectively, and maximum' slope
inclinations' of 1-1/2 to 1 will, in our opinion, have adequate.
factors of safety against deep-seated failure if constructed
in accordance with plans and specifications. .
(6) Concrete slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a
, . . minimum 4 inches of clean wetted sand. . . . .
(7) It is recommended that all .eart.hworking' be performed
in accordance with the Specifications" for Contr011ed Fill attached
to our preliminary report. The 'grading should be under th,e super-.
vision of a'qualified soil -engineer. All compacted fill should
be tested.. by a soil engineer.. It is further recommended that
all footing excavations be inspected by'Woodward-Cl'yde &. Associates
prior to placement'of steel and concrete. . .
The conclusions and recommendations made in this report are based 'on
the assumpti.on that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from
those disclosed by .the test borings or those anticipated by the' previous. '
experience in the area of-the subject project. Variations may be'encountered
and should be. anticipated. We 'should be notified. if variations do' occur,..
so we may make supplemental recommendations if this should be required
Louis K79
RPW/LJL/jsk : : '
, .
'
, ' :
•'
' S
, , , S
Attachment
4 cc
k . ' •.. ' S
WOODWARD CLYDE & ASSOCIATES
:. Consulting Soil and Foundation Engineers and Geologists '
326-. 31,5 320
315
I . Proposed \ 2
. i
- I -Tank \
hO
839
II .
I •d .
77
. 3.
-- — —
.'-Property
. i Line.
340
Existing-Tank
to be di.smantled
I
325
I . 330
. Approximately ) . / 35 - 900- feet to 30 Chestnut Avenue..
Indicates approximate location of
test boring. .
Indicates approximate
existing ground surface.
contour.
Boringl ..
I Medium-dense, damp, brown silty BC -.63* - 63 sand (SM) (Porous)
• : 2 • Very dense, damp, red-brown clayey
-
BC = 67 ]- sand (SC)
Cn
- grades to very dense, damp, reddish-
• BC = 90/6nJ _ brown silty sand (SM)
10 - (Poorly, indurated sandstone)
CL
- BC = I5/6 "
14
LEGEND
WC = Water Content in percent of dry weight
DD = Dry Density in pcf.
BC = Number of blows by I '1.0 pound hammer fail ing
30 -inches to drive sampler 12 inches. .
Sampler Data ID = 2 0", OD = 2 5"
(SM) = Group classification symbol in accordance with
the Unified Soil Classification System
Sample Number
LOG OF TEST BORING I
• • '.. •; . CITY OF CARLSBAD WATER SYSTEM IN PROVEMENTS
ELLERY SITE
i.4JODWARD.CLYDE & ASSOCIATES
. • • . .
• • • CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA .
LL-15
Boring3
0-
BC = 22 }L .Ivdiumdense, damp, brown silty
(SM)
Very dense, damp, red-brown clayey
BC = 34/6" II]2 sand (Sc)
5 -. .. 3 .1.1
4-I t becomes less clayey
a) 0 Cu .
10
Cn
CD
15.
BC = 67 ]- ..' Very dense, damp, brown silty sand ..
20 - (SM)
25 - .. . ..
.28—
For Legend, see Figure 2
LOG OF TEST BORING 3
•
. CITY OF CARLSBAD WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS:
ELLERY SITE
flOYJARD.CLYDE & ASSOCIATES
CONSuLTINGSOIL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
• • • • • SAN DIE, CALIFORNIA
• • • • DR. BY: ALS SCALE: I" = 5' • JPROJ. NO: 69-263
ICKID • BY: DATE: 10-1-70 ]FIGURE NO: •
I
RESULTS OF LOADED SWELL TESTS
•
&-i
Ninter
Initial • Final
pressure Expansion Dry
Density
ter
Content
•
Saturation
Dry Dry
Density
ter
Content
•
Saturation
pcf % pcf • %• • psf • %of Initial Hight
2-2 112.6 9.7 55 I II 2 16.2 88 160 1.2