Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 15-08; CARLSBAD RANCH PLANNING AREA 5; CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN RESORT PA 5; 2015-02-18URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. Pl.ANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, MARKETING & PROJECT SUPPORT CONSULTANTS TO INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT MEMO ATTN: Don Neu, Director -City of Carlsbad Planni11g Phone:-., Fax:-., Department (760)602-4601 Sam P. Kab, II 4~ TOTAL PAGES /Incl C.,erJ: 9 (760)602-8559 FROM: DATE: February 18, 2015 TIME9:44:44 AM JOB NUMBER: 004501 SUBJECT: Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Resort (PA-5) Confidential Communications This transmittal is intended for the recipient named above. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, this entire communication is confidential and privileged info11T1ation. If you are not the intended recipient, do not disclose, copy, distribute or use this infol1Tlation. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, at our expense and destroy the info11T1ation. PA-SRESORT The resort is approved for 350 hotel rooms and 350 timeshare villas, with 178 timeshare villas allowed to be built as lock-off units. The trip generation as stated in the approved CUP is 7,167 ADT, with the assumption that 25% of the lock-off units would be utilized at one time by more than one party. A trip generation report was submitted to Planning, dated October 3, 2008, that showed the total trip generation at 7,968 ADT when assuming lock-off units utilized at 100%. There is a need to revise slightly the room count and sizes of the restaurant and meeting spaces. As explained below and in the attached trip generation table, these units generate more traffic than originally assumed in the CUP. However, the total amount of resort traffic will be slightly more than the assumption of the original Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan for PA-5 (8,100 ADT assumed in the Specific Plan vs. 8, 190 ADT as revised now). Therefore, the revisions requested now would only slightly increase the traffic generation on nearby streets and at intersections above that evaluated in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan EIR so that traffic operations would stay within acceptable levels of service. Provided below are discussions of the tables in Attachment 1: Attachment 1 -Table I: Shows the trip generation of 8,100 ADT assumed for PA-5 in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan traffic study and EIR. The golf course referred to in this table was not meant to be the Carlsbad Crossings golf course, but a separate course within Specific Plan PA-8. This course will not be built. Attachment 1 -Table II: This table assumes the same uses and trip rates that were included in the approved resort CUP. The lock-off assumption in this table is at 25% utilization and results in 7,167 ADT. Attachment 1-Table Ill: This table increases the lock-off trip generation by assuming 100% utilization of the lock-off units, and shows revisions to the room count, the restaurant space, and the meeting space. The resulting trip generation will be 8,190 ADT, which is only 90 ADT more than the 8,100 ADT assumed in the Specific Plan for the resort, a I. I% increase in ADT. 1 Fina{()2/8l5 4540 Ke<1my Vili<I Road. Suite 106 • San Diego, CA 92123 • (858) 560-4911 • Fax (858) 560-9734 Don Neu © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 18, 2015 PALISADES RESORT In addition, the Palisades Resort Hotel has been underbuilt so that there are unused trips from this area. The table below shows the trip generation of the planned compared to the built project. r,j.~'.11~~ ,l• 'J':f~ ~ "" ~ .. l ADT Built Rate ADT 280Rooms 2 800 251 Rooms IO/Room 2 510 20,000 S.P. Retail 800 6 966 Restaurant e 100/KSF 697 Total 3,600 Total ~" • • ,_• _,.,,Cl~ eincludes outdoor dining. As shown, 393 ADT (3,600 ADT-3,207 ADT = 393 ADT) can be assumed as a "buffer" of trips so the conclusion of no additional impacts due to revisions and the lock-off 100% utilization are :further reinforced. Attachment 2: Includes documentation from the Specific Plan and CUP that show these uses and trip generation rate assumptions. EXISTING TRAFF1C CONDITIONS The current City of Carlsbad 2014 Traffic Monitoring report indicates existing levels of service on nearby high volume street segments and intersections are at acceptable peak hour levels of service, with available capacity, as shown below (and included in Attachment 3): · Segments Palomar Airport Road (Paseo Del Norte to Armada Dr.)= Peak Hour LOS A Cannon Road (Paseo Del Norte to Car Country Dr.) = Peak Hour LOS A Intersections Palomar Airport Road at Paseo Del Norte (AM Peak Hour LOS B ; PM Peak Hour LOS C) Cannon Road at Paseo Del Norte (AM Peak Hour LOS A ; PM Peak Hour LOS A) CONCLUSION The minor amount of traffic to be added above the original PA 5 approved ADT, only 90 average daily trips and approximately 9 peak hour trips, when distributed in all directions to the nearby road segments and intersections, would not change the levels of service at these or any other nearby locations. 2 Fina/0218 I 5 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, CA 92123 • (858) 560-4911 • Fax (858) 560-9734 Don Neu © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 18, 2015 ATTACHMENT 1 Carlsbad Ranch PA-5 Trip Generation Tables Table I • . i' • ~ -..... .,_· .,, -~: ~· ,· ..., ,..~ t Previous Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Atmroved ADT USE AMOUNT TRIP RATE Pointe Resort 6,000 S.F. Commercial e 16.000 S.F. Commercial e 24,000 S.F. Meeting e 19,000 S.F. Restaurant l Golf Course incl. 6 000 S.F. Club House eSupporting Uses of Hotel. KSF + 1, 000 Square Feet. :1~=,"'~'.""''! ~~ ~ . :~,·~;.u,Om.'J':!i lt ~-. ,.i < . ,. __ '. , ~:c:: 700 Rooms X 8/Room -- ---- 19KSF Xl00/KSF I Course X600/Course Total . ' . .. " . ~.-, ' '; ::I,; Table II ,. .• . -~!'. . .,.'.,'._ .. ... '';•,:::.i l•,,;,.,,r;d , __ ;::e,.-:,. ... Current Carlsbad Ranch PA-5 Aooroved CUP 03-01 USE AMOUNT TRIP RATE Resort Hotels 350Rooms X8/Room Timeshare Villas 350 Units X6/Unit Lock-Off Portion of Villas 178 Units X 6/4 I!: Qualitv Restaurant (Restaurant #1) 7 000 S.F. X 100/KSF Hotel Restaurant (Restaurant #2) 3.000 S.F. X 100/KSF Meeting Rooms 25,000 S.F. X 40/KSF Total ..:Assumes only 25% ofL-0ck-offunits occupied; 7,968 ADT when 100% occupied. Table III With Revisions and Lock-Off Units at 100% USE AMOUNT TRIP RATE Resort Hotels 338Rooms X 8/Room Timeshare Vil1as 344 Units X6/Unit 254 Units X6™ a lit Restaurant Restaurant # 1 4,000 S.F. X 100/KSF 3 500 S.F. X 100/KSF 28,700 S.F. X 40/KSF l'-'Assumes 100% of Lock-off units occupied. ADT 5 600 1,900 600 8,l00ADT '";L"!f~.li! ·• ~: ADT 2800 2100 267 700 300 1,000 7,167 ADT ADT Conclusion: The revisions and lock-off units occupied at 100% would generate slightly more ADT (8,190 ADT) than the previously approved Carlsbad Ranch specific plan ADT for PA-5 (8,100 ADT). Therefore, the revisions and lock-off unit assumption of 100% occupancy would only increase the traffic generation on nearby streets and at intersections by approximately 1.1 % above that evaluated in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan EIR. 3 Fina/021815 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, CA 92123 • (858) 560-4911 • Fax (858) 560-9734 Don Neu © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. City of Carlsbad Planning Department Febroary 18, 2015 Page 1 o/3 ATTACHMENT 2 • Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment, Final Program EIR excerpt, table 5-12 buildout trip generation. • CUP 03-01 excerpt, page 24, trip generation table 4 Final021815 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, CA 92123 • (858) 560-4911 • Fax (858) 560-9734 zQ c:,\:;! <:: 3~ ~~ ._.::;, :g"'" ..,.,fi ~ Q ij ,_ Oo ,_ .... TABLE S-11 LFMP -ZONE 13 TRIP GENERATION DUILDOUT DEI/E.LOPMEITT U\NO USE GENERATION RI\TE 0/\1LV I\M PE/I.IC HOUll TRIPS IN GIA 550,ooo sr-omc.it 2 pat slaff plu$ stdnU ( 1) 4,700 550 Camous Sp eciallv Aelall 325000 Sf 50 POI 1,000 Sf 18,250 227 Olfico 300,000 SF 20 per 1 000 SF 0000 756 R&O 500,000 SF 8 oar 1,000 Sf 4 000 576 Hole! 280 Rooms 10 per room/ ~.BOO:_ ·101 .. ~ ... 1 • : ·. ~E0?1~Ra1ail 40 per 1 ,000 SF _.,:.".~ 14 . .-~=: -3. . 115 __ __,, SOG&E 463,600 SF Trv Srvc 40 cer 1.000 SF 1B 544 334 Poin!o Resort 700 Rooms 8 per ,oom 5,600/ 168 8,000 SF Cornnercial (2) 16,000 Sf Con-merclal {'2) .- 24,000 SF Mealing (2) 19,000 SF Raslauran1 100 par 1,000 SF 1,900 1l 1 GoH Comse Incl. ~ 6,000 SF Clubhouse .. 600 par course ~ e:roo-'' 208 LEGOLANO (3) 8,102 152 Cadsbad Tolol 69,378 2,919 Nolea: (1) Pe, "Cailsbad Spocilic l'!,.n· {Uruan Systems Assoclales, Inc., June 1992). ('ll Supporting uses of hotel (31 T1ip generation per "Tralffc Sludy for the LEGOLAND Carlsbl'ld" (Kaku /\ssocialn~, Inc~ AprA 199'1). OUT 61 93 B4 6'1 67 10 TT 223 ' 112 8 7 127 0 733 PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL IN our TOTAL 611 132 526 658 325 731 731 1,463 840 156 624 780 640 56 504 S60 168 13'1 90 22• 24 36 36 72 192 170 128 296 556 83• 83• I 669 200 157 235 392 19 100 46 152 .:...1§ _!.§ ~ 51 335 279 319 598 152 150 726 876 3,651 2,509 4,390 6,899 @ ~ c,-s ~ ~~ [~ ;::. • cl' ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ .?o n. t-..>a 1-',J <::."" loo... ... ~ ~ .... ~ VJ r> .i:,.. \Ji .i:,.. <::, ~ i::i :l ~ ~ i:i" !:ti <::, ;:) -~ ~ :::, <I> ...... <::, 0, ~ :::i t:J ~- s:; Q ~ ..... t-.., ..... Crj \Ji ~ ..,, ~ ~ ..... ...... . ? ~ ..,, ~ ~ '? '¢ ~ ..... a, ~ i::i <:5 1-..> ..... Oo ....... ..,, Tiu, Clty or Car!sbnd Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: September 1, 2004 JlemNo. G) Applicil1011c:oa,pktc dale: · Jamuuy I•, 2004 Project Plonn<r. Saimo Qurc:shy Palject En,!ln=r. Oydc Wi&::ktum SUBJECT: SP l07{E)JLCPA 90-08/CT 03-02/SDP 03--02/CDP 03..()4/PUD 03-01/CUP 03-- 0J/HDP 03-01-CARLSBAD MNCll' Pl.ANNING AREA 5-RESORT SITE. -Request for appmvul. of a Mitigated Negative De<:laration and Addendum mid Mitigntion Monitoring and Reporting Program. Specific Phm Aroendmml, Loc,d Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Traci Map. Site De,elopmc:nt Plan, Coastal Development Pennit, Non-Residential Planned UniL Development Pamit, Conditional Use Permit and llJllside Development Permit for the development of a full =vice hotelftimeshsre "'""rt. Al buildout. the project will have a total of 350 hotel rooms, 350 timeshare units. two n:sb!.urants, meeling rooms and conference facilities for 2,000 occupants, and =ieatiollll amenitie. including pool&, tennis colll1s and a spon.s center. The subject site is 56.S2 acres in area and is located on the south side of Cannon Road, east of Annada Drive and west of Faradoy Avenue wi lhin Local Facilities Management Zone 13. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Plonnin& Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Rcsolntion No. 5685, RECOMl'<tENDlNG ADOPTION of o Mitigated Ncgalive Declaration and Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and ADOPT Planning Collllllission Resolutions No. 5693, 5692, 5686, 5687, 5688, 5589, 5690 and 5691 RECOMJ\1ENDING APPROVAL of Sp<,ciftc Plan Amendment (SP 207(E}), Local eoa.ta1 Program Amendmont (LCPA ~S(D)), Tent:itive Tract Map (CT 03-02}, Site Development Plan (SDP 03-02), Coast.al Development Plan [CDP 03-04), Non-Residential Planned Unit Developruent-Plan (PUD 03-01), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 03-0l) and Hillsille Developmeot Permit {HDP 03-01) based on the findings end subject to the oonditions coat:iined therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes Lo develop P!aoning Are<1 5 of the Corlsbad Ranch Specific Plan with a fuU service hotel/timeshare resoct. At buildoui. the project will have a total ot350 hotel morns, 3SO timeshnre units, Lwo restaurants, meeting rooms and conference facilities for 2,000 occ~pualS, and recreational amenities including swimming pools, tennis courts and a sports center. Toe subject site, Planning Area 5 of Lhe Cort.bad Ranch Specific Plan, is cmttnlfy ~ for fanning. The subject site is 56.52 acra in area. and is locnled on the SOt\th side of Cannon Road, enst of Anmuia Drive and west of Faraday Avmue within Local Facilities Mnnagement Zone 13. Th• development of lhe proposed resoct projecl. requires the proce,,sing and npprovnl of a Specific Plan Amendmcn~ Local Coastal Program Amel\dment, Tcntotive Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Coast11l Development Permit, Nao-Residential Planned Unit Development, Co™;litional Use Pcnnit ond Hillside Development PerrniL The Conditional Use Pemut fur the I.) -Polom:,,-Airpon d<vclcped by S.\NIJAG <fot«I .\pril 1994 .st:nes lhai db C'NEL l<tth of 60-iO ore coodnmn,· c:ompatil>lc foe laolcls :snd 1hc cu1doar noise b ·cb a.rt iaccrpgb1e ror associ:uc-d oai:Joor 11ctil'ibt'.s. · n Tor ... p~Je:ct wi1bin rue \"i~ini1y of :1 prh~II! iairstrip. n·1ullld 1ht-pnjKI npou people reshJin: or W4rk1ug m the proJ«t un to ~r\-e ooiu lu·•k! Xo_l~patl. ~ p~pmcd ~jccc is not 'lloimin I~ "Vicini,y of o. pri,':llc: ;.irsaip md Ulen'fatt ._;11 oar aJ)OSol' pt'llp~ rwdmg or wort:ms m d,e proJcct nca u, cxccain no~ kvt-ls. Xll. POP lit.A TIOr-. AliIJ HOUSING No lmp;1et (;t-t). Th~ projeel 1''0Wd tnull in lhe dr\-elopneru of .a bow::l a:nd ti~ uuil.5 sum:nmd.:d b¥ Oi~T commnri.,.J de\telopmern 1be,cfore, the projeei would DOl in.duce subsmu:i::1:1 irowih either di~d\' or indinxtfr. The project is proposed on a \"'iaUf lot and \YOWd noc dis-pl;.ce any e)tl~ hoUSDl! or in.fo-idooh.. · ~ XJIT. l'UBUC SERVICES :1) \Ynttld the project rCSt.111 In .sdbstantial ad-.·N"St phy~ illlpac:ts :isstt1:i:Jled wilb tbc prorlsioo or new or phyik,Jlr •tiered 1a\·rn:u:uc11t f:n:illlin,, ~ need for aewor p:tr,-st:t:::1.fly aJ1ered IHtrn11>a11 f1citi~ the cooslruciiGa of whltb could came sip.ific:u,t en.vtr~ut.runtat lmp:actt, h, onlcr la naJ.lauln :nare~lt H'r\iU nidm, re5J)OIJS" ti.ma:, or o{W p,rrarm:111cie objtdn'a for ay of fhll!: p11bUc No Impc.cL The propoW. pmjecl is k,cated in .loi,c l3 or Local 'Fo.c:ffi\1C'S M.a~l"llll:U,l -Pbia. The provisioo of poblic lacililic, wilhin the :Z.0-, 13 I.FMP, locludins me k police f"OltCtion, pmu. libr.lriC5 ,od otb<r publi< ra.cilities. h.iivc betn p11MCd 10 ac.i:ommod.lle the p:rl'lj~dgrowth in that area. Bte.lUSe t¥ project will nut c;-1:ciccd tbe -1 a,owth p,ojroion, rnticip>t,d wMlin the Z-13 J..Fl,(P, all public facilities will t,, ,dtqlw, "'5<M \he p.opo:std ckvtlopmnll 011. 1.hc sire. Thcieforc, lhe projtt:t wm not rnul1 Io ltlbsuintio:l ad\"em! ~too: res1.1b in the nttd for adwtionil i:ovc.nlmml taci}i1ics. XIV. IU:cru:A TION Nu lmpad (:i :and b). Tht proposed pro~l is ia Pul.. District 1 NW qual Silltt mt arc• is BOO iairJc1uial lbc:rc is ~i~ dcn~nd_ ~or ~rioni.l facilities. The projce1 wiU 1r a.svd & ftt of SOO.AO a $1.limllrc foot JICC'Onfing 'o Cily gaido!inu <o mn1g:ote fot lho u.sc:o( =r,:olionol hcilitics by cmploytt< and risimr.s. The pmJect.tn., IIDI i>anse the"" •r W<lin& nois)>bomood aod reaionat faoiliti<s iUCb that substantial physial d<tcrior.lli .. of Ille faolily would occur or OC' .cceltr-1.c:~. Nor docs the projc:rt -inc:11.de. re:cttaioml fanlitiH ar 1equiu the ,;omtroction or apa.mio11 nf rttre1Uom.l f1nli1ies, wb.x:h might hive i1D adverse physic.at effccr ou lhc emriroam£JJ.t. . XV. TRANSPORTAT!ONfl'RAFFtC. Would the project: :2} Cause an lnrrcan ill ll11ffic chat is nhstanttil.l la. rclatio.a to lbc cmtinc tn.Cf~ lttad ~nd cp:arity <lf the strut sy1ten1'! Ln~ Than SlgD.l.ficanl lmpsict. A uttff1r anoly:sis wu conducted for mt: Cnt.sW bnch Specific Plaa ER in August 1994. and • COltl!osrion Ma,ugtm,Ol Plan wa.s prq,,,,d in May 19SlS. Urbo• S)"S"'UIS d<veloped a trip ~ioo chart 111 2003 5j!Ccifi<llll)' lor !ht hot~ pn,ject. Thr proj«t is estimalod to llffl'IUC 7.167 Us• A.maant Trin.Ra1e AIYT Rcsonllows "50.,..,,, """""" 2.800 Tiznosha,,Vill,s 350 UI1dS a:6.'L1aic. -.,-,oo UJCt-(J(f,.,.....;oncf,oillas I?8untCS x6/4 267 maliw Rc:ltaunint CR,staunnt #Jl 7.000SF • 100/lw 700 ftotd Rcstwr.uu lR~UllJnnl l'l\ 3-000SF X IOM!f 300 Merlin• Rooms 2SOOOSF x•Olbf 1= 7,167ADT The pn>JOCt ll sem,cl by CnMon Ri»d lJlci Palom,r /11rpcn Road. While 111•......,. in traff., ftt11t1 the propolCd irojea rntlY be: .sli~)y 1101WbJe,· tht weer syucm bu been desicni:d J.nd ~ ra .xcommocble traJiie :fi'Dm lhe. Table 2-1 City of Carlsbad Mid-Block Roadway Segment LOS Analysis Summary Location Summer2010 Summer 2011 Summer2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Number Segment Segment Location Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak ADT Los• ADT LOS* ADT LOS * ADT LOS* ACT LOS" 1 Palomar Airport Rd. Paseo Del Norte to Armada Dr. 48,490 A 48,249 A 48,626 A 52,555 A 52,779 A 2 Palomar Airport Rd. Yarrow Dr. to El Camino Real 34,030 A 33,440 A 35,154 A 34,017 A 37,900 A 3 Palomar Airport Rd. El Camino Real to Loker Ave (W.) 45,080 A 45,902 A 52,786 A 48,560 A 50,651 A 4 Palomar Airport Rd. Melrose Dr. to Paseo Valindo 32,769 A 32,678 A 31,880 A 31,469 A 32,566 A 5 El Camino Real Plaza Dr to Marron Rd 26,406 A 27,806 A 29,245 A 29,355 A 30,288 A 6 El Camino Real Tamarack Ave. to Kelly Dr. 23,540 A 25,036 A 22,514 A 25,198 A 26,430 A 7 El Camino Real Jackspar Dr. to College Blvd. ----32,393 B 34,869 B 38,195 B 8 El Camino Real Faraday Ave. to Palomar Airport Rd. 36,200 A 36,281 A 30,477 A 31,739 A 34,867 A 9 El Camino Real Arena! Rd. to Costa Del Mar Rd. 46,203 A 47,151 B 49,760 B 49,299 B 51,393 B 10 El Camino Real Levante St. to Calle Barcelona 32,042 A 33,507 A 35,782 A 35,434 A 36,495 A 11 Melrose Dr. Lionshead Ave. to Palomar Airport Rd. 22,887 A 23,830 A 25,387 A 27,253 A 27,857 A 12 Carlsbad Blvd State St. to Mountain View Dr. 12,884 A 13,320 A 13,743 A 14,791 A 13,156 A 13 Carlsbad Blvd Acacia Ave. to Cherry Ave. ----17,653 A 19,001 A 18,668 A 14 Carlsbad Blvd Tamarack Ave. to Tierra Del Oro ----19,224 A 17,319 A 17,396 A 15 Carlsbad Blvd Cannon Rd. to Cerezo Dr. 16,882 A 16,565 A 16,128 A 16,755 A 17,714 A 16 Carlsbad Blvd Breakwater Rd. to Poinsettia Ln. 13,668 A 12,936 A 13,656 A 15,193 A 16,289 A 17 Carlsbad Blvd Avenida Encinas to La Costa Ave. 17,242 A 16,214 A 16,089 A 17,943 A 19,888 A 18 La Costa Ave Piraeus St to Saxony Rd. 32,767 A 33,742 A 35,371 A 38,373 A 37,795 A 19 La Costa Ave Romeria St. to Cadencia St. 12,1 90 A 12,196 A 12,043 A 12,087 A 12,266 A 20 Rancho Santa Fe Rd La Costa Meadows Dr. to San Elijo Rd. 28,786 A 27,187 A 30,793 A 28,979 A 28,959 A 21 Poinsettia Ln. Paseo Del Norte to Batiquitos Dr. 25,315 A 24,353 A 24,801 A 25,075 A 25,071 A 22 Tamarack Ave El Camino Real to La Portalada Dr. 8,808 A 8,663 A 7,905 A 7,705 A 7,669 A 23 Cannon Rd. Paseo Del Norte to Car Country Dr. 24,370 A 25,717 A 25,420 A 26,399 A 23,460 A 24 Cannon Rd. Hilltop St. to College Blvd. 17,793 A 17,462 A 17,764 A 18,561 A 19,281 A 25 College Blvd. N. City Limits to Tamarack Ave. (N.) 23,112 A 24,815 A 24,670 A 25,769 A 26,275 A 26 College Blvd. Aston Ave. to Palomar Airport Rd. 13,873 A 13,635 A 13,806 A 13,744 A 14,710 A 27 Alga Rd Corintia St. to El Fuerte St. 10,844 A 10,856 A 10,454 A 10,299 A 10,415 A • Roadway segment levels of service are based on peak hour operating conditions. For detailed peak hour analysis, refer to Table A-2 in Appendix A of this report. 8 Table 3-1 Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Summary Summer 2010 Summer2011 Summer2012 Summer 2013 Summer2014 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Count AM PM AM PM Intersection AM PM AM PM AM PM # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio 0 Ratio s s s s s s s s s El Camino Real & Plaza Dr. 0.34 A 0.65 B 0.34 A 0.66 B 0.32 A 0.62 B 0.33 A 0.63 B 0.33 A 0.64 El Camino Real & Marron Rd. 0.34 A 0.52 A 0.34 A 0.53 A 0.37 A 0.55 A 0.39 A 0.55 A 0.38 A 0.56 El Camino Real & Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.45 A 0.55 A 0.45 A 0.59 A 0.45 A 0.58 A 0.44 A 0.57 A 0.46 A 0.60 El Camino Real & Tamarack Ave. 0.63 B 0.59 A 0.64 B 0.59 A 0.66 B 0.53 A 0.68 B 0.63 B 0.69 B 0.61 El Camino Real & Cannon Rd. 0.60 A 0.78 C 0.61 B 0.80 C 0.64 B 0.76 C 0.71 C 0.81 D 0.67 B 0.81 El Camino Real & College Blvd. 0.56 A 0.53 A 0.61 8 0.55 A 0.48 A 0.72 C 0.54 A 0.61 B 0.58 A 0.67 El Camino Real & Faraday Ave. 0.65 B 0.70 B 0.66 B 0.72 C 0.62 B 0.76 C 0.69 B 0.75 C 0.68 B 0.78 El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Rd. 0.52 A 0.71 C 0.58 A 0.77 C 0.55 A 0.80 C 0.60 A 0.81 D 0.62 B 0.80 El Camino Real & Cassia Rd. 0.57 A 0.58 A 0.64 B 0.61 B 0.62 B 0.64 B 0.59 A 0.65 B 0.63 B 0.70 El Camino Real & Poinsettia Ln. 0.38 A 0.55 A 0.39 A 0.56 A 0.41 A 0.57 A 0.40 A 0.44 A 0.46 A 0.48 El Camino Real & Alga RdJAviara Pkwy 0.63 B 0.87 D 0.63 B 0.83 D 0.65 B 0.72 C 0.62 B 0.72 C 0.61 B 0.70 El Camino Real & La Costa Ave. 0.70 B 0.79 C 0.78 C 0.85 D 0.67 B 0.68 B 0.69 B D.82 D 0.73 C 0.79 El Camino Real & Calle Barcelona 0.45 A 0.57 A 0.48 A 0.61 B 0.52 A 0.62 B 0.52 A 0.61 B 0.55 A 0.61 Palomar Airport Rd. & Avenida Encinas 0.49 A 0.75 C 0.54 A 0.74 C 0.49 A 0.67 B 0.59 A 0.81 D 0.55 A 0.75 Palomar Airport Rd. & Paseo Del Norte 0.54 A 0.57 A 0.58 A 0.66 B 0.71 C 0.79 C 0.67 B 0.75 C 0.66 B 0.72 Palomar Airport Rd. & Armada Dr. 0.57 A 0.75 C 0.52 A 0.72 C 0.54 A 0.68 B 0.53 A 0.71 C 0.58 A 0.71 Palomar Airport Rd. & College BlvdJ 0.58 A 0.77 C 0.59 A 0.76 C 0.56 A 0.74 C 0.53 A 0.71 C 0.56 A 0.70 Aviara Pkwy Palomar Airport Rd. & Yarrow Dr. 0.41 A 0.52 A 0.43 A 0.54 A 0.43 A 0.63 8 0.48 A 0.62 8 0.52 A 0.68 Palomar Airport Rd. & Loker Ave. r,N.) 0.72 C 0.64 B 0.66 B 0.69 B 0.74 C 0.71 C 0.68 8 0.68 B 0.72 C 0.66 Palomar Airport Rd. & El Fuerte Sl 0.39 A 0.58 A 0.56 A 0.65 8 0.61 B 0.80 C 0.56 A 0.80 C 0.58 A D.82 Palomar Airport Rd. & Melrose Dr. 0.75 C 0.59 A 0.71 C 0.58 A 0.90 D 0.59 A D.89 D 0.67 B 0.77 C 0.71 Carlsbad Blvd. & Carlsbad Village Or. 0.29 A 0.53 A 0.30 A 0.57 A 0.36 A 0.56 A 0.33 A 0.47 A 0.32 A 0.46 Carlsbad Blvd & Tamarack Ave. 0.39 A 0.48 A 0.30 A 0.53 A 0.35 A 0.56 A 0.36 A 0.49 A 0.41 A 0.49 Carlsbad Blvd. & Cannon Rd. 0.50 A 0.68 B 0.58 A 0.80 C 0.41 A 0.70 B 0.43 A 0.65 B 0.50 A 0.70 Carlsbad Blvd. & Poinsettia Ln. 0.29 A 0.34 A 0.27 A 0.52 A 0.27 A 0.36 A 0.39 A 0.38 A 0.42 A 0.42 Note: Intersections operating at LOS Dare indicated in bold. Although LOS D is considered acceptable for peak hour operations, these intersections are identified as becoming potentially deficient in the future and need to be monitored closely as regional traffic volumes increase. 16 L 0 s B A A B D B C C B A 8 C B C C C B B B D C A A B A Table 3-1 {continued) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Summary Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer2012 Summer2013 Summer 2014 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Count AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM # Intersection ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU L ICU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio s Ratio 26 Carlsbad Blvd. & Avenida Encinas 0.33 A 0.44 A 0.30 A 0.57 A 0.30 A 0.34 A 0.39 A 0.34 A 0.42 A 0.38 27 Rancho Santa Fe Rd. & San Elijo Rd. 0.52 A 0.75 C 0.57 A 0.76 C 0.54 A 0.72 C 0.58 A 0.67 B 0.54 A 0.75 28 Rancho Santa Fe Rd. & La Costa Ave. 0.65 B 0.64 B 0.62 B 0.59 A 0.62 B 0.61 A 0.59 A 0.66 B 0.55 A 0.61 29 Olivenhain Rd & Rancho Santa Fe RdJ 0.54 A 0.54 A 0.56 A 0.59 A Camino Alvaro 0.61 B 0.55 A 0.65 B 0.63 B 0.67 8 0.63 30 Carlsbad Village Dr. & State St. 0.23 A 0.35 A 0.24 A 0.37 A 0.29 A 0.41 A 0.28 A 0.38 A 0.25 A 0.34 31 Carlsbad Village Dr. & Harding St. 0.35 A 0.50 A 0.37 A 0.53 A 0.50 A 0.64 A 0.46 A 0.57 A 0.45 A 0.64 32 Poinsettia Ln. & Aviara Pkwy. 0.41 A 0.52 A 0.44 A 0.51 A 0.42 A 0.53 A 0.39 A 0.56 A 0.44 A 0.58 33 Poinsettia Ln. & Paseo Del Norte 0.55 A 0.65 B 0.60 A 0.64 B 0.59 A 0.67 B 0.54 A 0.70 B 0.58 A 0.66 34 Poinsettia Ln. & Avenida Encinas 0.45 A 0.70 B 0.53 A 0.69 B 0.52 A 0.65 B 0.42 A 0.72 C 0.52 A 0.69 35 Melrose Dr. & Alga Rd. 0.44 A 0.60 A 0.47 A 0.57 A 0.44 A 0.58 A 0.44 A 0.59 A 0.42 A 0.62 36 Jefferson St. & Marron Rd. 0.34 A 0.52 A 0.35 A 0.55 A . 0.58 A 0.58 A 0.29 A 0.62 37 Monroe St. & Marron Rd. 0.23 A 0.32 A 0.21 A 0.34 A 0.37 A 0.44 A 0.23 A 0.35 A 0.21 A 0.34 38 Cannon Rd. & Paseo Del Norte 0.53 A 0.53 A 0.56 A 0.54 A 0.52 A 0.53 A 0.59 A 0.56 A 0.48 A 0.52 39 Cannon Rd. & Faraday Ave. 0.34 A 0.52 A 0.36 A 0.58 A 0.48 A 0.56 A 0.48 A 0.60 A 0.55 .. A•• o.ss- 40 College Blvd. & Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.69 B 0.48 A 0.51 A 0.46 A 0.49 A 0.45 A 0.51 A 0.51 A 0.54 A 0.55 41 College Blvd. & Faraday Ave. 0.44 A 0.50 A 0.44 A 0.54 A 0.48 A 0.51 A 0.50 A 0.52 A 0.56 .. A'" 0.63·· 42 1-5 SB Ramps & Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.53 A 0.72 C 0.55 A 0.68 B 0.49 A 0.66 B 0.50 A 0.64 B 0.49 A 0.72 43 1-5 NB Ramps & Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.58 A 0.65 B 0.54 A 0.66 B 0.68 B 0.81 B 0.57 A 0.67 B 0.59 A 0.71 44 1-5 SB Ramps & Cannon Rd. 0.43 A 0.47 A 0.47 A 0.48 A 0.46 A 0.49 A 0.53 A 0.51 A 0.47 A 0.46 45 1-5 NB Ramps & Cannon Rd. 0.46 A 0.56 A 0.49 A 0.58 A 0.47 A 0.65 A 0.50 A 0.67 B 0.44 A 0.63 46 1-5 SB Ramps & Palomar Airport Rd. 0.43 A 0.43 A 0.42 A 0.45 A 0.44 A 0.47 A 0.44 A 0.50 A 0.49 A 0.47 47 1-5 NB Ramps & Palomar Airport Rd. 0.65 B 0.73 C 0.64 B 0.71 C 0.66 B 0.65 C 0.65 B 0.68 B 0.65 B 0.67 48 1-5 SB Ramps & La Costa Ave. 0.54 A 0.56 A 0.52 A 0.58 A 0.53 A 0.57 A 0.60 A 0.62 B 0.60 A 0.58 49 1-5 NB Ramps & La Costa Ave. 0.55 A 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.64 B 0.63 B 0.77 B 0.61 B 0.69 B 0.64 B 0.66 Note: Intersections operating at LOS Dare indicated in bold. Although LOS D is considered acceptable for peak hour operations, these intersections are identified as becoming potentially deficient in the future and need to be monitored closely as regional traffic volumes increase. • Count data not collected in 2012 due to construction .. AM and PM peak hour LOS calculations are based on construction impacts at the intersection. 17 L 0 s A C B B A B A B B B B A A o- A s·· C C A B A B A B