Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout; ; Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan; 1997-04-22City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan September 16, 1986 Amended January 9, 1990 Amended April 22, 1997 CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Adopted by City Council Resolution No. 8797 Septembter 23, 1986 MARY Ha CASLER, MAYOR Claude A. Lewis, Vice Mayor Richard Chick, Councilmember Ann J. Kulchin, Councilmember Mark V. Pettine, Councilmember Frank D. Aleshire, City Manager Vincent F. Biondo, City Attorney Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director PLAN PREPARATION Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director James C. Hagaman, Research/Analysis Manager Gordon Peterson, Systems Analyst Bobbie Hoder, Administrative Assistant XI Philip 0. Carter, Administrative Assistant 11 Grace Manues, Administrative Assistant I Anita Ramos-Sonas Secretary I1 Barbara Nedros, Word Processing Operator Vicki Bowen, Graphics Consultants: Fay Round, Automated Systems Paul Zucker, Planning SANDAG - Automated Systems and Graphics Special Assistance From: Costa Real Municipal Water District Leucadia County Water District San Marcos County Water District Olivenhain Municipal Water District Carlsbad Unified School District Encinitas Union Elementary School District San Dieguito Union High School District San Marcos Unified School District Lee Rautenkranz, Information Systems Director Charlie Grimm, Assistant Planning Director Jim Elliott, Finance Director Cliff Lange, Library Director Dave Bradstreet, Parks & Recreation Director Jim Thompson, Fire Chief Roger Greer, Utilities & Maintenance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I SECTION 11 SECTION I11 SECTION IV SECTION V SECTION VI SECTION VI1 SECTION VI11 SECTION IX APPENDIX I APPENDIX I1 APPENDIX I11 APPENDIX IV APPENDIX V APPENDIX VI Overview Page 1 Contents of Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan Page 1 Requirement for Local Facility Management Plan and Relationship to Citywide Plan Page 3 Buildout Projections and Assumptions Page 5 Citywide Requirements for Public Facilities and Services - Existing to Buildout Page 12 Guidelines for Preparation of Local Facility Management Plans Page 56 Financing Options and Policies Growth Management Information System Page 70 Page 78 Applicability to Growth Management Ordinance (Section 2190 of the Page 90 Carlsbad Municipal Code) Ordinance No. 9808 Growth Management Program Resolution No. 8796 , Establishing the Clarified Performance Standards Resolution No. 8797 , Approving the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan Resolution No. 8798 , Establishing the Guidelines for the Preparation of the Local Facility Management Plans Resolution No. 8799, Establishing a Local Facility Management Plan Processing Fee Resolution No. 8800, Directing Staff to Prepare the Local Facility Management Plans for Zones 1 through 6 FIGURES 1, Local Facility Management Zones 2. Comparison of Citywide and Local Plans 3. Density Control Map 4. Citywide Acreage Information 5. Projected Dwelling Units and Population at Buildout 6. Dwelling Unit Sununary 7. Determination of Caapliance with Performance Standards 8(A) Public Buildings - City Administrative Facilities 8 (B) Public Buildings - Libraries 8(C) Public Buildings - Fire Stations 9. Sewer Service 10. Sewer District Boundaries 11. Parks 12. Drainage 1 3. circulation 14. Fire 1 5. Open Space 16. Schools 17. School District Boundaries 18. Water System 19. Water District Boundaries 20. Growth Management Information System 21. Entity Levels 22. Data Availability 23. Data Availability (Matrix Format) 24. Relationship to Parcel-Level Geobase 25. Informational Relationship Overview Page(s) 3 4 8 9 10 11 13 15 22 42 27, 50 28, 51 32 37 39 43 45 47 48 53 54 82 83 84 85-87 88 89 SECTION 1. OVERVIEW The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will implement the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance by ensuring that development does not occur unless adequate public facilities and services exist or will be provided concurrent with new development. The preparation of the Citywide Plan is the first phase in the implementation process of the City's Growth Management Ordinance which was adopted by Ordinance No. 9810 on July 1, 1986 by the Carlsbad City Council. Once the Citywide Plan is adopted, a Local Facility Management Plan will be required for each of the 25 local zones into which the City has been divided. This must be done before any additional development is allowed in any one of the zones. Then, when individual development projects are considered, a public facilities adequacy analysis will be provided as part of the report on the project to ensure that it is consistent with both the Citywide and Local Zone Plan. SECTION 11. CONTENTS OF THE CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan consists of the following: 1. Identification of the existing level of development in the City and a projection of the ultimate future buildout based upon recent controls placed upon development as specified in the General Plan and by the zoning. 2. Identification of all current and future public facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate existing and buildout demands for the land uses specified in the General ?lan and by the zoning. 3. Establishment of ongoing service' level requirements for public facilities through the adoption of specific performance standards for each of the following public facilities and improvements: City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire -1- h) Open Space i) Schools jl Sewer Collection System 4. 5. 6. The k) Water Distribution System Establishment of specific boundaries for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones and adoption of guidelines for the preparation of plans for the local zones. The local plans will specifically address the timing and financing of public facilities. Identification of the potential financing method, or methods, for each public facility and improvement. Establishment of an informational data based system to: A) project demand for public facilities and B) aid in the preparation of Local Facility Management c) provide a mechanism to monitor the adequacy of improvements, Plans, and public facilities on an ongoing basis. purpose of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan is to assure the elimination of the shortages of public facilities identified by the City Council to be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. Through the accomplishment of those tasks outlined above, the City will be able to ensure adequate public facilities and improvements or it will halt development until provisions have been made to correct these inadequacies. Again, the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan is the first phase in the implementation of the City's overall Growth Management Ordinance and it is intended to provide the framework necessary to allow more detailed phasing and financing plans to be accepted in the form of Local Facility Management Zone Plans. -2- SECTION 111. REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS - RELATIONSHIP IMPROVEMENTS PLAN As part of the overall Growth Management Program the City was broken down into 25. Local Facility Management Zones (See Figure 1). The boundaries for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones were established based upon logical facilities and improvements planning, construction and service relationships to ensure the economically efficient and timely installation of required public facilities and improvements. After the adoption of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and prior to any development occurring in any of these zones, a Local Facility Management Plan must be submitted and approved. The plan must be consistent with all aspects of the Citywide Facilities Improvements Plan and shall implement the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan within the Zone. It must ensure that each public facility and improvement meets the adopted performance standard prior to allowing any development. TO THE CITYW'IDE FACILITI'ES AND FIGURE 1 LOCAL FACILITY MA NAGEM EN1 20 NES -3- The preparation and submittal of the Local Facility Management Plan is the second phase in the implementation process of the City's Growth Management Ordinance. The local plan takes the Citywide plan and provides a more detailed description and analysis of how the City will develop from its current status on to ultimate buildout. The local plan will show how and when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order to accommodate development within the zone (phasing). It will also provide a complete description of how each facility and improvement will be financed. Figure 2 shows conceptually the relationship between the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the Local Facility Management Plan. Citywide Plan FIGURE 2 Local Plan S tandards Provision For Public Facilities Funding of Facilities Sets Standards Shows How Standards Complied With Inventory of Phasing from Existing and Existing to Future Future Buildout Needs Funding Detailed Options Financing Plan -4- SECTION IV. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PROJECTIONS In order to adequately assess and plan for Citywide public facilities and services, it was necessary to project the level of development that can be anticipated to the ultimate buildout of the City. These projections take into consideration recent- ordinances adopted by the City which reduce residential density and restrict the overall future intensity of development throughout the City. The process used to estimate the total number of dwelling units in the City at ultimate buildout is relatively straightforward. Using the City's General Plan map as a basis, all of the land uses shown were entered into a computer by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) using a process known as "digitizing.. The computer converted this digitized information into gross acres for each land use designation. Environmentally Constrained areas, beaches, wetlands, floodways, other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, were also digitized and converted into acreage figures in the same way. Other constrained areas included slopes greater than 25 percent, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major power line easements. The primary sources used in identifying these areas included previous environmental impact reports prepared for projects throughout the City and a Citywide slope analysis map. To obtain net developable acres, all of the 100 percent constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40 percent slopes were subtracted from the gross acreage figure for each land use category. In this way, ,a net developable acreage figure could be established for the overall City, for each quadrant of the City, and for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones. The net developable acreage figure was then multiplied by the number of dwelling units allowed per acre using the City's "Control Yield" density ranges, which are listed below: Residential Land Use Control Yield RL RLM RM RMH RH 1 .o 3 -2 6 .O 11.5 19.0 , The Control Yield densities represent either the midpoint of the City's adopted density ranges or actual experience using existing developments within each land use category. By applying the Control Yield densities to the net developable acreage figures, an estimate of the total number of dwelling units at full buildout can be derived. To carry the process one step further, the per capita household size data provided by the -5- State Department of Finance can be used to estimate buildout population. The data indicate that the City of Carlsbad had an average household size of 2-A-W persons on 3trnmrq-t-,--F9%5. The same type of calculations were used to estimate the total number of square feet of industrial and commercial land uses at buildout. However, instead of residential density ranges, a set of assumptions regarding site coverage for industrial and commercial development was applied to the net developable acreage figures. It was assumed that every net developable acre of industrial/commercial, would result in a maximum square footage yield of 40%. 2.3178 April 32, 1997 The methodology described in the previous paragraphs was used to provide a basis for determining the amount and types of public facilities that will be needed to adequately serve the City at buildout. However, it has a number of acknowledged short- comings. For example, the digitizing process itself is not 100 percent accurate, and when applied to small geographical areas, such as Local Facility Management Zones, some inaccuracies can occur. A much more accurate means of providing the same information would be via a parcel-level Geobase system, however, such systems are very complex and require a substantially longer time frame to implement. Therefore, concurrent with the development of the overall Growth Management Program, the City has begun work on developing such a Geobase system, which, at some point in time will supplant the methodology described in the previous paragraphs. Likewise, the dwelling unit estimates at buildout represent a straight conversion of acres to units, with no regard to the number of units already existing or approved throughout the City. This may result in inequities within certain zones where development has previously occurred under less constraining conditions or using higher density ranges than those represented by the Control Yield. In those cases, remaining development will have to occur at densities lower th’an the Control Yield figure. Despite these recognized shortcomings, the approach and methodology used within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan has been found to be quite adequate for the purpose to which it was intended, namely long-range facility planning. Therefore, until the parcel-level Geobase system described earlier is implemented, this approach will be used to provide the baseline estimates needed for both mid-term and long-term facilities planning. other planning assumptions used in preparing the Citywide projections included: 1. Dwelling unit projections do not include any density increases for special housing projects such as senior or low income projects. -6- Amended 4/22/97 2. Hotel, motel, time-share, board and care, and housing units without individual kitchen facilities which do not qualify as dwelling units in the building code were not considered as units for the purpose of dwelling unit calculations. 3. Likely changes to the City's Land Use Plan from a residential to non-residential use. The projection made for the total number of dwelling units in the City at ultimate buildout has been translated into a Density Control Map (see Figure 3). The map shows existing, future and total dwelling units for each quadrant of the city. Figure 4 (citywide Acreage Information) shows the number of acres in each land use category which was used to make the Citywide projections for ultimate buildout. Figure 5 (Projected Dwelling Units and Population at Buildout) shows how the acreage was converted into projected dwelling unit and population totals. Figure 6 (Dwelling Unit Summary) provides a summary of existing, approved and remaining dwelling units in the City. The information regarding buildout projections and assumptions is needed to determine the required demand for public facilities and services as growth occurs. The methodogy for projecting dwelling units at buildout, a 'control yield", follows the procedure which has always been used by the City in implementing the density ranges of the Land Use Plan. It is important to formalize this procedure as part of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan since the projection has been translated into ultimate demand for public facilities and services. If the "control yield" is not closely adhered to, then the planned facilities and improvements may not be adequate. -7- -0- FIGURE 3 DENSITY CONTROL September 8,1986 DWELLING UNITS BY OUADRANT 4 Revised 1 /9/90 SEPTEMBER 16, 198 FIGURE 4 CITYWIDE ACREAGE INFORMATION RESIDENTIAL : RL LOW (0-1 .5) RLM LoW-Med (0-4) RM Medium (4-8) RMH Med-Ei (8-15) RE High (15-23) COMMERCIAL : CBD C N RC TS 0 RRFI RRI RS Central Bus Dist comamuni ty Neighborhood Recreation Travel Services Prof * 1 6 Related Extensive Retail Intensive Retail Regional Service INDUSTRIAL : PI Planned Ind OTHER : E J H AC P G rj NRR os RR PW MAJ MIN COL Elementary School Jr. High School Righ School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Res Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Ma jot Arterial Minor Arterial Collector St 1,824 7,935 2,638 1,231 243 70 32 1 49 108 191 333 32 119 39 2,175 200 79 202 4 17 26 8 158 382 4,398 117 213 525 510 54 1 270 710 184 110 8. 0 41 11 30 31 80 0 5 0 148 9 0 10 0 0 0 19 2 2,078 117 213 525 510 54 1 37 9 660 156 79 5 1,364 6,895 2,375 1,081 233 70 280 38 78 160 253 32 114 39 2,027 191 79 192 4 17 26 8 139 38 0 2,320 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 24,920 5,652 1,279 18,629 -9- City of Carlsbad FIGURE 5 SEPTEMBER 16. 1986 RMH RH (& RVH) CITY OF CARLSBAD 1,081 11.5 12,430 30,7 13 233 19 4,488 11,090 Projected Dwelling Unit and Population at Buildout fi 18,629 LAND USE CONTROL D.U.s at POPULATION 1 YIELD BUILDOUT at BUILDOUT I 1,364 1 1,364 3,37 1 54,599 134,914 RLM 1 6,895 I 3.2 I 22,065 I 54,522 I I I I I I RM 1 2,376 I 6 1 14,252 1 35,218 NON-RES 1 6,680 I ASSUMPTIONS 2.3178 1) PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT M AS PER THE STATE DEPT. OF FINANCE - 10- Amended 4/22/9 hit, of Carlsbad FIGURE 6 SEPTEMBER 16. 1986 CITY OF CARLSBAD DWELLING UNIT SUMMARY EXISTING 39% \ REMAINING \ I EXISTING APPROVED REMAINING BUILDOUT 21,121 10,298 23,180 54,599 -11- city of carlsbad SECTION V. CITYWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES - EXISTING TO BUILDOUT The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan addresses eleven separate facilities: City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage C i r c u 1 a t i on Fire Open Space Schools sewer Collection System Water Distribution System For each one of these facilities and services the following is provided: An illustrative map showing what is existing and what is needed Citywide at buildout (Figures 8 through 18). City Administrative Facilities, Library and Fire have been combined into one map - Figure 8 (A, B, C) and Wastewater Treatment and Sewer Collection have been combined into one map - Figure 9; District boundary maps where applicable; Adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times as growth occurs in the City; and A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis for each of the three Citywide facilities. A general description of the facility planning information for the remaining eight facilities. Compliance with the adopted performance standard for each of these eight facilities will be analyzed when a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted. Compliance with the adopted Performance Standards will be reviewed and analyzed in the following manner: Citywide Basis 1) City Administrative Facilities, 2) Library, 3) Wastewater Treatment Capacity. These facilities will not need to be included in the Local Facility Management Plan, so long as the preparers of those plans feel these Citywide facilities will be constructed at a time and on an adequate basis to correspond with projected development within the zone. -12- Quadrant Basis - City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Parks Circulation Drainage Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution 4) Parks Compliance will be determined at the time a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted for the zone. Zone Basis 5 ) Circulation 6) Drainage 7) Fire 8) Open Space 9) Schools 10) Sewer Collection System 11 1 Water Distribution System Compliance of each of these facilities will be determined at the time a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted for the zone. At that time, the responsible governing agency will determine the adequacy of schools, sewer and water. Figure 7 (Determination of Compliance with Performance Standard) summarizes how compliance will be determined. FIGURE 7 DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE WITR PERFORMANCE STANDARD b 1 I CITY * QUADRANT ZONE CITYWIDE ZONE ZONE DETERMINATION PLAN PLAN OF ADEQUACY DETRRMSN- DETERMIN- ATION OF ATION OF ADEQUACY ADEQUACY X X X X X X Ix I ZONE SPECIAL DISTRICT DETERMIN- ATION OF 1 -13- , The type of adequacy and phasing analysis that is contained in the Citywide Plan for City Administrative Facilities, Library and Wastewater Treatment Capacity is Similar to what will be expected for all the remaining facilities addressed in the Local Facility Management Plans for each zone. It should be emphasized regarding the maps in this section, that because of their scale they are for illustrative purposes only. Larger descriptive maps have also been prepared, however, precise locations of facilities should be determined from Master Facility Plans available in the department or agency responsible for the facility. Also, because of the detail required, the maps for sewer, water and drainage only illustrate future planned facilities or improvements. Performance Standards for Citv Administrative Facilities. Libraw. and Parks' The Performance Standards for City Administrative Facilities, Library, and Parks indicate that improvements must be "scheduled for construction within a five year period or prior to construction of 6,250 dwelling units." This section is intended to provide further clarification regarding what these Performance Standards mean and how they are to be applied. In developing the Performance Standards contained in this pian, staff projected that an average of 1,250 dwelling units per year would be constructed after 1986. Therefore, for purposes of City Administrative Facilities and Library the 'five year period" is intended to mean the amount of residential development equal to 1,250 dwelling units per year for five years, or a total of 6,250 dwelling units. The counting years or units begins at the point in time that the demand for the facility first exceeds the supply. Because Parks are addressed on the basis of Park District which coincide with the four quadrants of the City, it is assumed that the 1.250 dwelling units per year are spread equally among the four quadrants. This yields 312.5 dwelling units per quadrant per year, which is rounded downward to 312 dwelling units. Therefore, the 'five year period" for Parks is intended to means the amount of residential development equal to 312 dwelling units per year for five years, or a total of 1.560 dwelling units within a Park District. The counting years or units begins at the point in time that the demand for the facility first exceeds the supply. For all three of these facilities, the phrase "scheduled for constrirction" means that the improvements needed to meet the demand have been designed, that a site has been selected and has been acquired or is being acquired, and that a financing plan for construction of the facilrty has been approved by the City Council. This section was included in the Cit;rwide Facilities and Improvements Plan by an amendment approved 1 on April 22, 1997 by City Council Resolution No. 97-437. Amended 4/22/97 -14- FIGURE S(.A! PUB1 IC BUILDlNGS SEPTEMBER 18, IS86 CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES-EXISTING CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES-PLANNED ---- - -15- 1 City of Carlsbad CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES PERFORMANCE STANDARD 1500 square feet per 1000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period or prior to construction of 6,250 dwelling units, beginning at the time the need is first identified. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory 1. Buildout Assumptions: Population Current 52,190 At Buildout 134,914 Required Square Footage 78,300 sq.ft. 202,371 sq.ft. 2. Existing Facilities: a. City Hall Facilities City Hall 12,899 sq.ft. Finance Modular 2,700 sq.€t. Purchasing/Personnel Modular 1,800 sq.ft. Leased Space R/A Group Public Relations Redevelopment 960 sq.ft. 200 sq.ft. 2,000 sq.ft. Las Palmas Facility 22,627 sq.ft. 43,106 sq.ft.. b. Public Safety and Service Center Phase I Police and Fire 53,700 sq.ft. Vehicle Maintenance 10,358 Sg.ft. 64,058 sq.ft. c. Total Existing Facilities 107,244 sq.€t, - 16- Amende& b/22/97 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES (Continued) 3. Facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: Item Source Year Amount - sq. ft. a. Public Safety Center Phase 11* Design 86-87 $ 255,000 Construction 62,000 89-90 $3,455,000 PFF/s/w** b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program. 62,000 square feet. 4. Capital Facilities to be Considered Later; An additional expansion of City Hall is shown in the City's Capital Improvements Program as a future project to "be considered". The project is estimated at a cost of $4,000,000 to be funded by the Public Facilities Fee. Although the square footage of this facility has not been projected, a cost of $lOO/sq.ft. would result in a 40,000 sq. ft. building. PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PAASE 11. Yard offices, Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for the use of Utility Maintenance, Parks h Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and Purchasing. Ipproximate size is 62,000 square feet, including two-story yard office and Purchasing warehouse with 6,400 square feet mezzanine. ** PFF - Public Facilities Fee S - Sewer W - Water Enterprise -17- CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES (Continued) B. Phasing Population projections for the entire City phased on a yearly basis, are shown in Table 1 (Dwelling Unit and Population Projections). These projections are based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management system, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. TABLE 1 PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT .............................................. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 21,121 22 , 371 23 , 621 24 , 871 26,121 27 , 371 28 , 621 29 , 871 31,121 32,371 33 , 621 34 , 871 36 , 121 37 , 371 38 , 621 39,871 41,121 42 , 371 43 , 621 44 , 871 46 , 121 47 , 371 48 , 621 49 , 871 51,121 52 , 371 53 , 621 54 , 599 33 , 478 32 , 228 30 , 978 29 , 728 28 , 478 27,228 25,978 24 , 728 23 , 478 20,978 19 , 728 18 , 478 17,228 15 , 978 14 , 728 13 , 478 12 , 228 10 , 978 9,728 8 , 478 7 , 228 5,978 4,728 3 , 478 2 , 228 978 0 22 , 228 1,250 1 , 250 1 , 250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 978 52 , 190 55 , 279 58,367 61,456 64 , 545 67 , 634 70 , 722 73 , 811 76 , 900 83 , 077 86 , 166 89 , 255 92 , 344 95,432 98 , 521 101,610 104 , 699 107 , 787 110 , 876 113 , 965 117 , 054 120,142 123,231 126 , 320 129 , 409 132 , 497 79 , 989 55 , 279 58 , 367 61 , 456 64 , 545 67 , 634 70 , 722 73 I 811 76 , 900 79 989 83 , 077 86 , 166 89 , 255 92 I 344 95 , 432 98 , 521 101 , 610 104,699 107 787 110 , 876 113 , 965 117 , 054 120 , 142 123 I 231 126 , 320 129 409 132 497 134 , 914 - 18- CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES (Continued) A comparison of the inventory to the standard yields the following table: TABLE 2 POPULATION SERVED BY PLANNED CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES Population Served Existing or Planned Facilities According to Standard Facility Square Footage For Increment Accumulated Existing Facilities 107,244 sq.ft, 71,078 71,078 In 5 Year C.I.P. 62,000 sq.ft. 48,666 119,744 Future 40,000 sq.ft. 26,666 146,410 209,244 sq.ft. Based on these population projections and the standard, the number of square feet needed per year is shown in Table 3. (Square Feet of City Administrative Facilities Needed by Year and Square Feet Available) on page 21. The facilities summarized in Table 2 have also been shown in Table 3. A comparison of the Tables yields the following conclusions: 1. Current City Administrative Facilities meet the standard and will continue to meet the standard until approximately 1992. 2. When the facilities proposed in the 5 year C.I.P. are constructed the standard will be met to approximately the year 2005. 3. After the year 2005, the additional "future- City Administrative Facilities will need to be added to the C.I.P. in order to meet the standard. 4. Based on current population per household of 2.471 persons, there is a future need for City Administrative Facilities beyond that programed in the C.I.P. of 33,127 square feet. -19- CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES (Continued) C. It should be noted that for the purpose of determining the adequacy of City Administrative Facilities that several leased facilities are included. These leased facilities may not always be in use by the City and at some future date may result in shortages of City Administrative Facilities. Also, the City has no centralized facility to serve the space needs of it's staff. This, decentralization of City departments may also need to be resolved. The City Council on August 26, 1986 approved the final report entitled, .A Strategic Plan and Space Needs Study of the City of Carlsbad City Hall and Libraries' which was prepared by Michael Feerer h Associates. The Council held off from making any decisions regarding the recommendations made in this study for City Hall Facilities. Financing The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF) which is set at 2.5% of permit valuation. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. In calculating the PFF the following expenditures were projected for City Administrative Facilities: Public Safety Center Phase I1 $3,400,000 City Hall - Futute $4,000,000 $7,400,000 In addition to the PFF fundsI the City's 5 year Capital Improvement Program indicates the use of Sewer funds and Water Enterprise funds for part of the Public Safety Center Phase 11. The City's current projection for City Administrative Facilities as shown above indicates a need to expend a total of $7,400,000. This amount could be funded by the projected sources. Additionally, based on the standard, the entire $4,000,000 expenditure may or may not be necessary. However, there is no quarantee that the PFF fees will actually be available when needed. Additional analysis should be undertaken on or before the year 2005 to analyze the likely availability of the $4,000,000 needed for future expansion. -20- TABLE 3 PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY SQUARE FEET OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES -------------------.----------------------------- NEEDED BY YEAR AND SQUARE FEET AVAILABLE 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 8 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 55,279 58 , 367 61,456 64 , 545 67 , 634 70,722 73 , 811 76 , 900 79 , 989 83 , 077 86 , 166 89 , 255 92 , 344 95 , 432 98,521 101,610 104,699 107 , 787 110,876 113 , 965 117 , 054 120,142 123 , 231 126,320 129,409 132 , 497 134,914 82,918 87 , 551 92 , 184 96,817 101,451 106,084 110 , 717 115,350 119 , 983 124 , 616 129,249 138 , 516 143 , 149 147,782 152 , 415 157,048 161 , 681 166,314 170,947 175 , 581 180,214 184 , 847 189 , 480 194 , 113 198 , 746 202 , 371 133,882 107,244 i1 11 169 , 244 II II II 11 11 11 II 0 II II II II 11 11 11 11 FACILITY NEEDED -2 1- FIGURE S(3) PUBLIC BUILDINGS SEPTEMBER 16. 1086 FIRE STATIONS-EXISTING (> FIRE STATIONS-PLANNED CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES-EX1 STING CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES-PLANNED -22- City of Carlsbad LIBRARY PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period or prior to construction of 6,250 dwelling units, beginning at the time the need is first identified. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory 1. Buildout Assumptions: Current At Buildout 2. Existing Facilities: Civic Center Library Adult Learning Center Audio/Visual Office La Costa Area Library Warehouse Total Population 52,190 134,914 Owned sq. ft. 24,600 24,600 Required Square Footage 41,752 107,931 Leased sq. ft. 400 500 4,500 2,000 7,400 Total owned and leased space 32,000 sq. ft. 3. Facilities in the five year Capital Improvement Program: The adopted Five Year C.I.P. includes $650,000 for the design of a main library in the southern area of the City. Also, in Appendix A of the C.I.P. .To Be Considered Capital Projects,. the construction of this library is estimated at $6,900,000 to be funded by the Public Facilities Fee. 4. Other Information: The City Council on August 26, 1986 approved the final report entitled, 'A Strategic Plan & Space Needs Study of the City of Carlsbad City Hall h Libraries' which was prepared by Michael Feerer & Associates. The Council adopted option #5 of the library portion of the study which directed staff to initiate a site selection study to be returned for Council consideration by Amended April 22, 1997 -2 3- LIBRARY (Continued) B. January 1 , 1987. If implemented, this would add R,000 square feet to the existing northern library along with renovating the current facility. The partial project costs are estimated at $1,974,000.. It would also include building a new 58,000 square foot facility in the southern portion of the city at an estimated partial project cost of $8,365,000. The report indicated these estimates do not include costs for site acquisition or development, demolition, landscaping, artwork, financing, City project administrative costs, construction management or any parking structure costs. Phasinz Population projections for the entire city were prepared on a yearly basis and are shown in Table 1 (Dwelling Unit and Population Projections) on Page 18. These projections are based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized for the City's Capital Improvements Program and the Public Facilities Management System, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. A comparison of the existing inventory of library facilities to the adopted performance standard yields the following table: TABLE 2 Population Served By Existing or Planned Library Facilities Existing or Square Population Current Planned Facilities Footage Served Population Existing Future* 32,000 - 40,000 - 52,190 - *There are no approved future facilities Table 3 (Square Feet of City Library Needed by Year and Square Feet Available) provides a detailed breakdown of the square footage of library space needed yearly to meet the adopted performance standard based on the population projection estimates from Table 1 (Dwelling Unit and Population Projections) on Page 18. A simple comparison of these tables clearly indicates a current deficiency in Library facilities of 9,752 square feet. If the City Council approved the new site location for the southern facility and appropriated the necessary funds, -24- LIBRARY (Continued) C. the City's Library space needs would be adequate until approximately the year 2005. If the additional 8,000 square foot expansion of the northern library were also approved and funded, this standard would be met until approximately the year 2008. After the year 2008, additional space would be necessary. Pinancinql The city currently collects a Public Facility Fee (P.P.F.) which is set at 2.5% of Permit Valuation. This fee is paid at the time of permit issuance. The adopted C.I.P. allocates $650,000 of P.F.F. funds to design a new library facility. Other possible funding sources could be: General Capital Construction, Revenue Sharing or State or Federal grants. At the present time there are no funds appropriated for the construction of additional Library space. D. Alternatives There are a number of alternatives which could be considered to rectify the current library deficiency, however, after discussing these options staff believes one of the following three alternatives should be considered: 1. Amend the current five year C.I.P. to include funding for new library facilities, which would require deleting other projects; 2. Wait until the site selection study is completed and returned on January 1 , 1987 and adopt the appropriate recommendation to resolve the deficiency at that time which would mean that no additional development could- occur in the interim; or 3. Direct staff to attempt to resolve this deficiency based on the Local Facility Management Plans which will be received after the approval of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. It should be noted that for the purposes of assessing the adequacy of the Library to the adopted Performance Standard that leased apace has been included. This space should be considered temporary and may not always be available for use by the Library. -25- SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 TABLE 3 PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY ................................................. SQUARE FEET OF CITY LIBRARY NEEDED BY YEAR AND SQUARE FEET AVAILABLE YEAR ENDING SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET YEAR NEEDED PER AVAILABLE POP. STANDARD OR PLANNED 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 1998 2008 55,279 61,456 64 , 545 67,634 70,722 76,900 58 , 367 73,aii 79,989 a3 , 077 89,255 9a , 521 107 , 787 110, a76 86,166 92 , 344 95,432 101,610 104 , 699 113 , 965 117 , 054 120,142 123,231 126,320 129,409 132 , 497 134 , 914 44,223 32 , 000 46,694 49 , 165 CURRENT 51,636 DEFICIENCY 54,107 EXISTS 59,049 FACILITY 61,520 NEEDED 63 , 991 66 , 462 71,404 76 , 346 56,578 6a , 933 73 , a75 78,817 ai~aa a3 , 759 86,230 aa , 701 91,172 93,643 96 , 114 101,056 103,527 107,931 98,585 105,gga -26- City of Carlsbad TRLHK UNES . . . . . . . WE UNE & EXlSTlNG BUT LPaRADlNQ PLANNED TREATMENT PLANT -2 7- FIGURE 9 SEWER SERVICE SEPTEMBER 16. 1086 City of Cartshad FIGURE 10 SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SEPTEMBER 18. 198e 0 CARLSBAD SEWER SERVICE AREA LEUCADIA COUNTY WATW DISTRICT '.*...... SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT .*A:. -2 8- City of Carlsbad WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Sewer service to the City of Carlsbad is provided by three separate and independent agencies. The majority of the City receives service from the City's Sewer District. Approximately 5,200 acres of land in the southern part of the City receives service from the Leucadia County Water District (LCWD), and the San Marcos County Water District (SMCWDI provides sewer service to roughly 550 acres on the eastern edge of the City. The service areas of these two agencies extend well to the south and east of the City's boundaries, but for the projections and analysis only that portion of the District's service area within the City of Carlsbad was considered. 1. Car 1 sbad LCWD SMCWD TOTAL Buildout Assumptions: Wastewater Treatment Demands Population - EDU* %D** Current Buildout Current Buildout Current Buildout 35,760 95,669 18,090 47,800 4.5 11.8 13,985 36,151 5,810 15,000 1.4 3.6 0.3 52,190 134,914 24,889 64,000 6 .O 15.7 - 0.2 - 2,445 3,094 989 1,200 EDU - Equivalent Dwelling Units = 246 gallons per day for SMCWD, 238 for LCWD. ** MSD - Million Gallons per Day - Average Dry weather Flow Carlsbad and ADWF 2. Existing Facilities: Wastewater from the three agencies is treated at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities (WPCF), which is owned and operated by six separate independent agencies. City of Carlsbad, their currently owned treatment capacity at the Encina WPCF is: Of the three agencies which provide sewer service in the Carlsbad Sewer District - 25.4% or 5.7 MGD Leucadia County Water District - 16.7% or 3.8 MGD San Marcos County Water District - 17.8% or 4.0 kK;D -29- WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY (Continued) Both Leucadia and San Marcos own and operate their own separate treatment and reclamation facilities as shown below: Leucadia County Water District: Gafner WitP - .75 MGD (ADWF) San Marcos County Water District: Meadowlark WRP - 2.0 MGD (ADWF) The City of Carlsbad also has an additional treatment facility at Calavera Hills which will have a 1.2 MGD (ADWP) capacity when it is brought into operation. 3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: Because the Leucadia County Water District and the San Marcos County Water District are independent agencies, their specific capital improvements are detailed in their appropriate long term planning documents. For this reason, capital improvement facilities covered in this section will address those within the purview of the City of Carlsbad only. The adopted C.I.P. includes two items which will be funded from tihe sewer fund: 1. Encina WPCF - Phase IV scheduled for 1989 - $5,130,000 2. Calavera Hills - scheduled for 1990 - $2,000,000 B. Phasing The following table provides a planning projection of demand and available treatment capacity at Encina WPCF for the City of Carlsbad's service area. As this table shows, the current capacity at the Encina WPCF is adequate to accommodate the projected MGD demand for the City of Carlsbad's service area until 1990. Following the Phase IV expansion at Encina, Carlsbad's capacity will be adequate until 2000. If the scheduled expansion program is not carried out as planned, the City has several options available which would maintain adequate sewer treatment capacity, such as: 1. Activate the Calavera Hills Plant - 1.2 MGD (6,000 EDU) 2. Purchase or lease plant capacity from other agencies. Based upon the information provided by the Leucadia County Water District and the San Marcos County Water District for their existing demand in Carlsbad, their capacity ownership at Encina WPCF, as well as their other sewer treatment and reclamation facilities are adequate. Each agency will review and approve the Local Facility Managment Plans and specific phasing plans which could affect their facilities. -30- WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY (Continued) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 C. Financing 18 , 090 19 , 233 20,376 21,519 22 , 662 23 , 805 24 , 948 26 , 091 27 , 234 28 , 377 29 , 520 30,663 31,806 32 , 949 34 , 092 35 , 235 36 , 378 37 , 521 38 , 664 39 , 807 40 , 950 42 , 093 43 , 236 44 , 379 45,522 46 , 665 47 , 800 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.3 5.6 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.7 7.0 7.3 7.5 7.8 8.1 8.4 8.7 8.9 9.2 9.5 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.6 10.9 11.2 11.5 11.8 5.7 It tl It II 8.6 II It I1 It It It I1 It 11 NEW FACILITIES NEEDED The City of Carlsbad as well as the other two districts currently collect a sewer hook-up fee for each dwelling unit or other type of ,3evelo,ment occuring within their service area, wastewater treatment capacity improvements. These fees would be the funding source €OK -31- -32- PARKS PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park of Special Use Area per 1,000 population within the Park Dlstrrct D~ scheduled for construction within a five year period or prior to construction within a flve year perloc or prior to construction Of 1,562 dwelling units within the Park District, beginntng at the time the need IS first identified. ADO~IONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The Growth Management Park standard has been developed to address Communtty Park and Special Use Areas together. Combining the two will provide greater flexibility for the Parks and Recreation Department to address the future needs of each quadrant as development occurs. The Parks and Recreation Department ramtty prepared an analysis of existing park acreage in the City which produced the following information: A. INVENTORY 1. Buildout Assumptions: Northwest Quadrant Current At Buildout Northeast Quadrant Current At Buildout Pow lation 23,539 37,979 7.1 07 22w Southwest Quadrant Current 541 6 At Buildout 31 ,nS Southeast Quadrant current 16,128 At Buildout 42,817 2. Existing Community Pulo and Specid Uso Are-: Communitv Padq (Undwel0p.d) Cannon taka M8cuio Curyocr - crodit Tow Und.vul0p.d &m 5.4 27.0 6.8 AI &Qa 2S.O 6.t Total Reauired Acres 70.62 113.94 21.32 67.03 16.23 95.33 48.36 128.45 42.2 31 .? -33. Revised 10/89 Revised 1 /9/90 Revised 4/22/97 - PARKS (Continued) Special Use Areas Buena Vista Cannon Park Car County Chase Field CHS Tennis Courts Barding community Center Jefferson Elementary Kelly Elementary Magnolia Yaxton Brown Maxton Brown Extension Oak Pine Elementary Pi0 Pic0 Rotary Swim Complex Valley Jr. High School Total Northeast Quadrant Community Parks (Developed) Calavera Hills Phase I Larwin Total Developed Community Parks (Undeveloped) Macario Canyon - credit Calavera Bills Phase 11 Total Undeveloped Special Use Area Larwin Total Southwest Quadrant Community Parks (Developed) A1 t ami r a Total Developed Community Parks (Undeveloped) Macario Canyon - credit Total Undeveloped Acrcs 2.3 1.7 1 .o 2.3 3 .O 1 .o 2.6 2.8 4.2 1.4 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.8 1 .o 3 .O 7.5 39.1 Acres 8.0 18.3 26.3 Acres 25 .O 10.0 35 .O Acres 4 :o 4 .O Acre8 12.0 12.0 Acres 25.0 - 25.0 There are no Special Use Areas in the Southwest Quadrant. -34- - PARKS (Continued) Southeast Quadrant Communitv Parks (Developed) La Costa Canyon Stagecoach Total Developed Communitv Parks (Undeveloped) Macario Canyon - credit Alga Norte Carrillo Ranch Total Undeveloped Special Use Areas Cadencia Fuerte Fuerte Elementw Levante St. Elizabeth Total C. ADEQUACY EVALUATION Acres Required Communlty Per Standard Park lDevl Northwest Quadrant 70.62 42.20 Northeast Quadrant 21.32 26.30 Southwest Quadrant 16.23 12.00 Southeast Quadrant 48.38 37.00 Cityuvlde Totals 1 sd.55 117.50 Acre? 9.0 37 0 - - Acres 25.0 23.0 - 10.3 58.30 - Acres 4.1 3.6 2.0 8.0 u 18.7 - Special Use Total Area Acreaae 39.10 81.30 4.00 30.30 0 12.00 1 0.7Q 55.70 61.00 179.30 On a Citywido buir, tho ovurll puks acreage b adequato. However, the Growth Management Program requiroa oadl qurdnnt to provide the appropriate acreago in relation to its residential population. For that rea$on, th. southwest quadrant does not moot the performance standard and is deflcknt T?w throo 0th.r quadrants meot the performance standard. It should be notd 8a shown in the existhg acreage figures that in certain quadrants there exista a greatw prom of Spocid Us0 Area acreage 8s compared to Communlty Park acreage. The pwformmca st8ndud allows the Puks and Recreation Department the ability to more property address tho indlvidurl quadrant nods for either Communlty Park or Special Use Area acreago 8s la plms am submitted. -35- Revised 10189 Revised 1/9/90 PARKS (Continued) Alternatives There are several alternatives which could be considered to rectify this deficiency, however, after discussing these options staff believes one of the 'following should be considered: 1. Amend the current Five Year C.I.P. to include funding for new park facility in the Southwest Quadrant which would require deleting other projects. 2. Direct staff to attempt to resolve this deficiency based on the Local Facility Management Plans which will be received after the approval of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. -36- FIGURE 12 DRAINAGE SEPTEMBER 18. 1086 -37- City of Cirlsbad DRAINAGE PERFORMANCE STANDARD Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The standard for drainage distinguishes it from all of the other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately assessed as the specific development plans for individual projects are finalized. Therefore, the standard has been written to allow the City to require the appropriate development drainage facilities as these plans are finalized and approved. Those drainage facilities which are of a larger nature have been addressed in the City's Master Drainage Plan which was completed in March 1980. Since that time, the City has made various improvements to the overall drainage system. At the present time, the Engineering Department is working to update the City's Master Drainage Plan. This is necessary to address several issues although the following two items are the major reasons for updating the plan: 1. The addition of the San Diego County Flood District area to the City, and 2. The proposed change. to the calculation method used to determine 50 and 100 year flood flows. The City currently collects drainage fees in various districts to fund these needed major drainage facilities. The new Master Drainage Plan will assure that these funds are sufficient to provide adequate drainage facilities. -35- FIGURE 13 CIRCUL A TlON SEPTEMBER 16. 1986 -39- city of carlsbad CIRCULATION PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where 20% or more of the traffic generated by the local facility management zone will use the road segment or intersection. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The City is currently in the process of conducting a comprehensive traffic analysis for the entire City exclusive of the La Costa Area. The La Costa Area study was concluded in May, 1986 and identified certain existing deficiencies which will need to be addressed as the specific Local Facility Management Plans are prepared. The current study will provide this same type of information for the remainder of the City. The final results will not be completed until December 31, 1986. In the interim, all local plans will be required to provide their own specific traffic analysis and inventory of existing and future service levels. In order to ensure consistency, the information and analysis in the local plans will be verified by the traffic data generated by the SANDAG Traffic Model and the La Costa Traffic Study. Overall, the City is working to resolve the current traffic problems with traffic impact fees as well as a Bridge h Thoroughfare Benefit District with fees collected to improve the interchanges at Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane and La Costa Avenue at 1-5. It must be emphasized, however, that while the City will start collecting fees to resolve existing problems and to ensure future adequacy, the necessary funds will not be available immediately. In the interim, the cash flow to correct existing problems is a development responsibility which must be addressed in the Local Facility Management Plans. With respect to future adequacy of the circulation system, the local plans must address how all streets located within the zone, or impacted by the zone, will be constructed and funded. For those circulation facilities which are to be constructed at a future time, the local plan must detail when and how sufficient funds will be deposited with the City, beginning with the initial unit of development to pay for the facility when it is required by the phasing program. -4Q- CIRCULATION (Continued) The intent of the circulation standard is to ensure an acceptable service level during peak and non-peak hours on road segments and intersections under the control and jurisdiction of the City. Currently and in the future, there may be certain intersections which fail to meet the performance standard, but for which the City does not have jurisdictional control and therefore, could not halt development because of this condition. An example of this is El Camino Real at Highway 78, which presently has an inadequate service level but is located outside of the Carlsbad City limits and is in Oceanside. The best the City can do is to continue to work to resolve this condition and collect fees to pay for future improvements. -4 1- FIGURE 8 (C) PUBLIC BUILDINGS SEPTEMBER 16, 1088 FIRE STATIONS-EXISTINQ 0 ,FIRE STATIONS-PLANNED m Li BR ARi Es -PL ANN ED & LIBRARIES-EXISTINQ CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES-EXISTING CITY ADMl NI STRATION FACl LI TI ES-PLANNED -42- city of Carlsbad FIGURE 14 FIR E SEPTEMBER 18. la06 THESE ZONES NEED TO AODRESS THE FIRE STANDARD FOR THE ZONE -4 3- City of Carlsbad PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1,500 dwelling units oiitside of a five minute response time. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION A. Inventory: The city has four existing fire station locations: Station 11 - 1275 ~lm Avenue Station 12 - 1906 Arena1 Station 13 - 3701 Catalina Station (14 - 6885 Batiquitos Road (Under construction) At buildout the City will require two additional fire stations which are proposed for the following locations: Station 15 - Rancho Santa Fe/Cadencia Station 16 - At the Public Safety Center Station #5 is scheduled for construction in the 5 year C.1.P for 1989-90. Station (6 is scheduled for construction in the 5 year C.I.P. for 1990-9. Finally, station 13 is scheduled to be relocated in 1990-91. B. Adequacy Evaluation: The following Local Facility Management Zones presently meet the fire performance standard and are adequately covered to build-out of the city. These zones are: remaining Local Facility Management Zones must address fire adequacy in their local plans (see Figure 14 1. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23. The -44- FIGURE 15 OPEN SPACE SEPTEMBER 16, ieee *...*... a AREAS WHERE 16% AOOlTlONAL PERMANENT OPEN SPACE TO BE PROVIDED MCLUSIVE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY COPIeTRAINED LAK) -45- City of Cdsbad OPEN SPACE PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non- developable land 'must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with d ev e 1 opme n t . ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATON: The preceding map highlights those areas of the city which will be required to comply with the open space performance standard. The other areas of the city are already developed or meet or exceed the requirement. Local Facility Management Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 16 already meet the standard while Zones 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 must detail in their local plan how they will meet this standard. -46- FIGURE 16 SC~OOLS SEPTEMBER 18, 1980 -47- City of Carisbad FIGURE Ti SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SEPTEMBER 18, 1988 -48- SCHOOLS PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The City is served by four school districts: 1. Carlsbad Unified School District 2. San Marcos Unified School District 3. San Dieguito Union High school District 4. Encinitas Union Elementary School District The preceding, illustrative map shows the proposed future school sites along with those that presently exist. These locations were- determined during the School Master Location Study which was completed in 1982. Based on the new land use densities and the information provided to the Carlsbad School District, they are considering the possibility of updating the School Location Plan. With the exception of the Carlsbad School District, the remaining three districts provide approval for new development so long as the appropriate fee is collected. The Carlsbad School District collects a fee but also negotiates certain items on an individual basis with each developer prior to providing a 'Will Serve' letter to the City. The Growth Management Program and adopted school perfor- mance standard will allow this process to continue. The major difference to the previous process is that be- fore, the districts were only able to review projects individually. Now, during the Local Facility Management Plan review, they will have the ability to view a much larger, comprehensive plan. This added information will enable the districts to consider alternate plans of action and to make necessary adjustments in advance of the impact of new development. -49- FIGURE 9 SEWER SERVICE SEPTEMBER la. 1088 TRWX LINES FVTLAE LINE . . . . . . . R :lh- EXlSTlNQ BUT LWAADINQ PUNNED TREATMENT PLAN7 -50- City of Carlsbac FIGURE 1G SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SEPTEMBER 18. 7988 CARLSBAD SEWER SERVICE AREA LEUCADIA COUNTY WATW DISTRICT SAN MAACOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT .*.e.... -5 1- Gity of Carlsbar SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate sewer district must be provided concurrent with development. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The City is provided sewer service from three agencies: 1. City of Carlsbad 2. Leucadia County Water District 3. San Marcos County Water District Each of the three service providers have completed master plans for the major public facilities needed to service the City. The San Marcos facilities are in place now which will provide service for buildout needs of their service area. The Leucadia County Water District completed their agency's Master Study Plan in September 1985 which provides for all facilities needed to buildout. The Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan was completed in April 1985, and it also provides for all facilities needed to buildout. Sewer facilities are such that the exact size and capacity of each line depends on the individual development projects being proposed. Theref ore, the master plans developed by each agency are able to address these needs at the project level. The existing Sewer Collection System is adequate to meet current service demands. The future plans of each agency provide the necessary facilities to service the City at buildout. Each service provider will review and approve all local plans that affect their service area to ensure that the adopted performance standard is maintained based on the phasing of development. -52- FIGURE 18 WATER SYSTfM SEPTEMBER 10. 108R - FUTURE MUOR TRN( Ut€S FUTURE RESEVOIR -5 3- City of Carlsbad FIGURE 19 WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SEPTEMBER 18. 1086 0 COATA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BUENA COLORADO WATER DISTRICT SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT -54- City of Carlsbad WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE STANDARD Line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided concurrent with development. A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided prior to any development. ADDITIONAL FACILITY PLANNING INFORMATION The City has three water service providers: 1. Costa Real Municipal Water District 2. Buena Colorado Water District* 3. San Marcos County Water District 4. Olivenhain Municipal Water District Each of the three service providers, exclusive of Buena Colorado Water District, have completed master plans for the major public facilities needed to service the City. The San Marcos facilities are in place now which will provide service for the buildout needs of their service area. Olivenhain has identified certain existing facilities which will need to be upgraded and improved in order to meet the needs of future growth. Costa Real has identified those facilities which will need to be added, upgraded, and improved in order to meet the needs of future growth. For the most part, the facilities needed to service the City are presently in place, and where future facilities are needed, they have been identified in the appropriate Master Plan. The existing Water Distribution System is adequate to meet current service demands. This includes both line capacity and the minimum 10 day storage capacity. The future plans of each service agency provide the necessary facilities and storage capacity to meet the buildout needs of the City.** Each service provider will review all local plans that affect their service area to ensure that the adopted performance standard is maintained based on the phasing of development. *At some future date, the Buena Colorado Water District's Carlsbad service area will be absorbed into the Costa Real Municipal Water District. **The San Marcos County Water District has determined a 3.2 day storage supply of water for their district's local service area. Because the Carlsbad service area is so small, it has been determined that their storage capacity is adequate. -55- SECTION VI. GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF A. B. LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS REASONS FOR GUIDELINES These guidelines have been prepared to: 1. Assure that the Local Facililty Management Plan will be consistent with and implement the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the overall Growth Management Ordinance; 2. Develop a consistent format for each of the twenty- five facility management zones which will facilitate review by decision makers and the public alike: and, 3. Provide clear directions to property owners, consultants, and developers who may prepare management plans, with the aim of reducing the costs or time delays associated with the process. OVERALL FORMAT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 8 1/2" by 11" All documents to be 8 1/2" by 11. with a vertical format. Where larger maps or tables are needed, provide them on 11" by 17. fold out pages. Print One Side Only To facilitate review and notation of documents, please print on one side of paper only. Page Numbers Page number the entire document sequentially, rather than by section to facilitate easy reference. Exhibits, Figures and Tables Label exhibits, figures and tables numerically or alphabetically and include in the Table of Contents. Appendixes Any lengthy documentation felt necessary, such as traffic studies, lengthy calculations, large maps, etc., should be included in an appendix section, or separate appendix document. -56- C. EDITORIAL GUIDELINES 1. 2. 3. Adequate Avoid using words like "adequate", instead, always quantify in specific numerical terms. Sources When using or referring to secondary sources of data, be specific, i.e., report names, dates, authors, page numbers, etc. Methodology Be specific about the methodology used for analysis, cite all secondary sources. D. CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1. 2. 3. Entire Zone The plan should cover the entire zone. Plans submitted for only a portion of the zone will not be processed. General Plan and Zoning The Local Facility Management Plan shall be based upon the General Plan and zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of approval. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan The Local Facility Management Plan shall be consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and shall implement this plan within the specific zone. E. SPECIFIC OUTLINE The Local Facility Management Plan should follow the outline and must include the contents listed below: -57- 1. Title Page Include zone number, name, address, and telephone number of sponsor of zone plan, all consultants, and date of preparation. 2. Table of Contents The table of contents should be comprehensive and include a list of exhibits, figures, tables and appendices. 3. Introduction Include, here, a brief description of the zone and background maps. Maps should include the following: A. citywide Local Facility Management Zones Map; please highlight the specific zone under consideration with a graphic pattern. B. Latest General Plan map of the zone. C. Latest City zoning map of the zone. D. Map and table indicating the major (25 acres or larger) property owners in the zone and acres of property owned by each. For smaller holdings, list the number of owners and acres in aggregate. Also list popularly known names of development projects included in the zone. Where a specific project has been filed with or approved by the City include City's official reference number. 4. Buildout Assumptions A projection of the buildout for the zone shall be provided including residential and non-residential land use acreage and constrained land. A map and tables showing how dwelling units and acreage projections were determined shall be provided. The map shall show the location of all environmental and other constrained lands including beaches, permanent bodies of water, floodways, wetlands, riparian or woodland habitats, major power transmissions lines, major roadways, railroad tracks, slopes with an inclination of 25 percent to 40 percent and those greater than 40 percent, open space areas previously designated on the City's Land Use Map and other land upon which significant environmental features are -58- located as determined by the environmental review process for the Local Facility Management Plan. Also include population projections based on 2.471 persons per household. The buildout projection for the zone shall be checked by City staff for compliance with the methodology and projections made by the City as part of the preparation of the Citywide Facilities and lmprovements Plan. Should the City Council's Referendum or the Citizen's Initiative be passed on the November ballot, additional instructions may be issued for this section. 5. Facilities Having Citywide Impact City Administrative Facilities Library and Wastewater Treatment Capacity have been analyzed as part of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and are monitored as part of the City's annual monitoring report. To the extent that the preparers of the Local Facility Management Plan feel that these Citywide facilities will be constructed on a timely and adequate basis for appropriate development within the local zone, no further analysis is required within the local zone plan. Analysis should be included only if recommendations are made to modify the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan for these facilties including plans, standards, phasing or funding. Additionally, any wastewater treatment that is proposed to be handled at other than the Encina Plant, such as the Calavera Bills Reclamation Plant, should be discussed in detail in this section. If the Citywide analysis is acceptable, include in this section a statement indicating that the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan has been reviewed for these three facilities and indicate that it is acceptable for zone development. 6. 'Facilities Not Having Citywide Impact A separate section shall be included for each of the following eight facilities: Parks Circulation -59- Drainage Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water Distribution System Each section shall contain the following sub- sections described further below: A. City Standards B. Inventory C. Phasing D. Financing I. City Standards For ease of reference, please repeat the City Performance Standard at the start of each section. I I. Inventory The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan includes a preliminary inventory of present and future requirements for each facility and improvement. The Local Facility Management Plan should confirm this inventory and provide additional details including cost estimates for the specific zone. Because improvement requirements for certain facilities and improvements may overlap zone boundaries, a discussion of the need €or coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone to another shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvements capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the City's adopted performance standard. A few additional specific guidelines €or facility inventory are included below: 1. PARKS The plan shall include: i. A map of the Park District within which the zone is located. If a zone lies in more than one Park District, a map shall be shown for each Park District. -60- ii. A map and list of all existing and proposed community or special use parks within the related Park District (City Quadrant I. 2. CIRCULATION The plan shall include: i. A map of the existing and proposed street system, categorizing streets by the City Circulation Element criteria. ~ll existing prime arterials, major arterials, secondary arterials and collector streets shall be shown. For the proposed street system, new collector streets that are internal to the subdivisions and that will be built and entirely funded by the developer as part of an individual development need not be shown. For any circulation element road, an alignment plan with a scale no greater than 200 feet per inch shall be prepared showing the vertical and horizontal alignment of the road. The limits of the alignment should be extended beyond the zone boundary to a logical terminus as necessary subject to the approval of the City Engineer. For ease of analysis it is suggested that existing streets be shown with a solid line and proposed streets with a dotted line. Use a wider line width for the prime arterial scaling down to a narrow line for collector streets. The map should normally include land outside of the zone which is necessary to analyze how the circulation system works for the entire zone. The map must indicate 'impacted" road segments or intersections outside the zone. ii. A table and/or map indicating existing street capacities, traffic volumes and service levels during off-peak and peak hours for all road segments and intersections. -61- iii. A table and/or map indicating projected street capacities, traffic volumes and level of services during off-peak and peak hours for all road segments and intersections at buildout. iv. A list of technical assumptions or methodology used in the analysis such as trip generation rates by land use, traffic modeling systems used, etc. If city studies are used for the analysis simply reference the City studies. v. Until the Citywide Traffic Impact Study is completed (January 19871, the circulation information shall be verified by City staff requesting an independent review by SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 3. DRAINAGE The plan should include: i. Map of natural drainage areas in relation to topography. ii. Map and listing of existing and proposed facilities including: Pipes Desil tat ion basins Retention basins Open channels (earth or concrete) Headwalls Clean Outs iii. For any facility not shown in the City's Master Drainage Plan or recommended changes to the City's plan, list specific assumptions and calculations used in the analysis such as expected flows (cfs) and capacities for each facility. 4. FIRE The plan should include: i. A map of existing and proposed fire stations serving the zone. For each station show the five minute response time. -62- ii. A table and/or map indicating the number of existing and proposed dwelling units outside the five minute response time of existing station. 5. OPEN SPACE The plan should include: i. A map and table (acres) showing all existing land to be considered as open space. Such areas might include pocket parks, homeowners ball fields, planned residential development (PRD) common areas, golf courses, tot lots, swimming pools, tennis courts or other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities, such as major power line easements. where any portion of the zone is to be developed with large lot, standard single family development (minimum 7,500 square foot lots) , the amount of open space may be proportionately modified. ii. When known, a map and table indicating all proposed future open spaces. If possible relate these spaces to specific property ownerships or developments. Where feasible, the plan should inventory any sites within the zone that are particularly suited to open space use and that will enhance the overall livability within the zone. 6. SCHOOLS List the name of the service agency(s) for the zone. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency, and include a map showinq each agency's service area. Service agencies include San Dieguito Union High School District, Encinitas Union Elementary School District, San Marcos Unified School District, and Carlsbad Unified School District. The plan should include a map of existing and proposed elementary, junior high and high schools serving the zone. For each school show current and projected enrollment and rated capacity. Indicate assumptions used such as students per household. -6 3- 7. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM List the name of the service agency(s1 for the zone. Service agencies include Leucadia, San Marcos, and Carlsbad. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency and include a map showing areas served. The plan should include: i. Map of the natural drainage areas in relation to topography. ii. Map and list of existing and proposed trunk lines (normally 12 inches and larger), force mains, and pump stations. iii. List of technical assumptions used in analysis such as: Gallons per day for residential uses. Gallons per acre per day for non- residential uses. Buildout assumptions by drainage area. iv. For each facility indicate size, capacity in cubic feet per second, current utilization in cubic feet per second, projected buildout utilization in cubic feet per second, cost estimates. v. A discussion of how the proposed system relates to water reclamation plans within the zone or other zones should be included. If golf courses or large park and open spaces are included, the plan shall include a specific discussion of the reclamation potential, and indicate if the property owner will agree to use reclaimed water, if available. 8. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM List the name of the service agencies for the zone. Service Agencies include Olivenhain Municipal Water District, San Marcos County Water District, and Costa Real Municipal Water District. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency and include a map showing each area served. -64- The inventory should include: i. Map and list of existing and proposed facilities including major transmission lines, storage facilities, water - treatment and pumping facilities, and local water resources. ii. List of technical assumptions used in analysis such as: Gallons per day for residential uses. Gallons per acre per day for non- residential uses. All golf courses or proposed large open spaces, or parks to be watered shall be identified. Fire flows. iii. For each facility indicate size, capacity, current utilization, projected buildout utilization, cost estimates. iv. A discussion of how the proposed system relates to water reclamation plans within this zone or other zones should be included. If golf courses or large parks and open spaces are included, the plan shall include a specific discussion of the reclamation potential and indicate if the property owner will agree to use reclaimed water, if available. 111. Phasing A phasing schedule establishing the timing for installation of the facilities or improvements in relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space, etc.) shall be submitted for the facility management zone. The phasing schedule shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not utilize more than the area's pro rata share of facility or improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first development. -65- Periods where facilities and improvements may not meet the City standard shall be indicated, and the plan shall either: i. Provide a means for meeting the standard, or ii. Suspend development in the zone for a period of time until the standard is met. The primary goal of the zone plan is to provide more up front, longer term plannning for public facilities. The phasing analysis and schedules are primarily for planning and 'early alert. purposes. It is recognized that when development will actually take place relates to many variables that change over time. Nevertheless, it is necessary to prepare phasing assumptions in order to analyze facility phasing, construction and financing plans. The decision as to whether a specific project may proceed will be made in relation to both the zone plan and the actual project approval. In both cases analysis will relate directly to assurances that the Performance Standards can be met. Both dwelling unit and non-residential land usage should be projected on a year-by-year basis over a twenty year time line similar to the analysis that was done in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Development projected beyond the 20 year period should be shown in one remainder number. A table for the specific zone should be included as part of the plan. City staff will verify the "reasonableness' of these projections based upon regional growth predictions prepared by SANDAG, projections made by the City in conjunction with the Capital Improvements Program and actual historical trends. Specific facility phasing for each of the eleven facilities should relate directly to these projections. When considered helpful, alternative phasing schedules may. be submitted. For example, such schedules might document that facilities will be adequate for variable rates of development within the specific zone. Additional instructions for specific facilities are as follows: -66- SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Any temporary pump station required, due to phasing of facilities shall be clearly identified. Future development proposals requiring pump stations that are not identified in the zone plan will not be approved without amendments to the zone plan. D RAI NAG E It should be shown that the proposed phasing schedules will not create any onsite or downstream problems in relation to erosion, flooding or siltation. IV. Financing Plan A financing plan estabishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included: The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the development projects located within the zone. Where facilities are proposed to be constructed in the future and the costs are to be allocated to various properties or developments within the zone, the plan shall so indicate and a Facilities Management Fee shall be proposed. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon the estimated cost of the facilities spread to a specific increment or level of development. The fee shall be collected unit by unit in relationship to the specific demand beginning with the first unit of development. These fees shall be held in deposit with the City in order to assure funds will be available when the facility is needed. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City, special District or State as part of its normal capital improvement program. The facilities should be shown on an approved capital facilities program. -67- iii. iv. V. vi. Where the City or Special District proposes to build a facility as part of its normal capital improvements program but such facility is not currently shown on an adopted capital improvements program, supporting verification and documentation should be included from the city or special District. Other funding sources such as assessment districts or grants shall be discussed in detail along with rationale as to why this source is considered workable. If developer reimbursement agreements are anticipated in relation to financing they should be so indicated. Detailed rationale as to why reimbursement is reasonable, a reference to the legal authority allowing such an agreement, and how such reimbursement is to be arranged shall be included in accordance with the proposed construction schedule and development phasing plans. Where facilities or improvements are required for more than one zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the plan for each zone shall be coordinated. coordination shall not require identical funding methods, as long as the plan assures that funds will be available concurrent with need. Additional instructions for specific facilities are as follows: OPEN SPACE Open space will normally be reqqired as part of the development. Any proposal to include open space as part of a City-maintained program will require extraordinary justification. SCHOOLS Please discuss here an understanding of the school districts funding plan, particularly in relation to developer agreements for development approvals within the zone. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM If temporary pump stations are proposed, a financing plan covering the operations of the pump stations during the temporary period shall -68- be included. It will normally be assumed that this operation will be funded by the related development. F. ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Property owners list and addressed stamped envelopes (metered must be undated) - A) a typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within the zone and within a 600 foot radius of the zone, The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls. B) Two separate sets of legal size (#lo), addressed stamped envelopes of the property owners within the zone and within a 600 foot radius of the zone. Do not type assessor's parcel number on envelopes. Leave return address blank, C) A map to scale not less than 1.=1000' showing each lot within the zone and within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the zone. Each of the lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Department if the required scale is impractical. 2. Number of copies of plan - Fifteen (15) copies of the plan shall initially be submitted, Once the plan has been reviewed by staff and is ready to be scheduled for public hearing, an additional fifteen (15) copies shall be submitted. 3. A deposit of $10,000 shall be submitted - All staff and city consultant time and materials in reviewing the plan shall be fully documented. If any of the deposit is unexpended, it will be refunded following the public hearing. If the deposit does not cover the cost of reviewing the plan, an additional fee will be charged before the plan is scheduled for public hearing. -69- SECTION VII. FINANCING OPTIONS AND POLICIES When the Work Plan for the Growth Management Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on July 1, 1986, a detailed financing plan and analysis was not requested for the facilities and improvements which were to be addressed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. It was understood that detailed financing plans would be required as part of the preparation of the Local Facility Management Plans. Rowever, this section does address available cost estimates and funding sources for those citywide facilities under the City's control. The table titled "Future Public Facilities List" at the end of this section shows these facilities. Those citywide facilities to be installed or financed through the operations of the various special districts are referenced in the district's appropriate master plans. The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carlsbad generally fall into two categories -- those provided by developers as a condition of development approvals, and those provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, or other financing sources. The Growth Management Ordinance further defines this division by listing the projects that qualify for funding from one of the usual City sources. It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction and maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects in the best possible way. The following describes some of the financing options available to the City. A. Cash/Pay-as-you-qo financine. The City has used this method of financing to pay for most capital improvements constructed to date. In concept, the City charges the development community a series of fees which provide the source of income to pay for capital projects. When enough cash has been assembled, the City constructs the next capital project in order of priority. This method forces the City to delay construction of various projects until funds have been collected. These fees include: 1. Public Facilities Fee 2. Park-In-Lieu Pees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees 4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee 6. Sewer Fees 7. Water Fees Special Districts collect their own various fees. -70- B. Reimbursement Agreements. In certain instances, a developer may ask the City to move a project forward in time and to construct a facility before funds have been collected. When this occurs, the City could adopt the policy of having the interested developer construct the project based on a reimbursement agreement. The City would pay the developer back for the portion of the project that was to be funded by City resources over a period of time. Payments would commence at the time the City had originally scheduled construction. Moving the project forward in time is for the benefit of the developer. Therefore, the City's repayment would be limited to the cost of the public portion of the project and no interest would accrue to the developer. The use of this method of project financing does not eliminate the developer's obligation to pay City fees. The developer must still pay all City fees associated with a development. C. credit for City Fees. When it is in the public interest to construct certain public facilities earlier than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go program, the City can consider giving a developer credit for fees that would otherwise be paid, up to the cost of the public improvement. These credits would reduce the amount of fees payable in future years from a certain d eve 1 o pmen t . Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid elimination of income from capital fees necessary to finance other projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits: - Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a Fublic improvement would be eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project. - Partial fee credit - credit over time: In this option, the developer who builds a public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that credit is spread over a series of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees -71- designated for capital projects while giving the developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. Yo interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement. D. Debt Financing. A range of debt financing alternatives are available to the City. If it is in the public interest to push a project ahead and to construct an improvement before funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If the project is being pushed forward for the convenience or benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the cost of issuance and interest over the life of the debt issue. The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to determine the developer's responsibility to support costs is yet to be defined. Some of the debt financing vehicles available are shown below: Assessment Districts: Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a developer in the construction of various public improvements that may be financed through the use of assessment districts if there is significant public benefits from the improvement. In cases where a City contribution would be necessary to a district, the City may ask a developer to pay the City contribution. The developer could then be reimbursed at a later date (i.e., in the year that the capital project had been originally scheduled for construction) or through a system of credits as described earlier. Special Benefit Districts: State law allows the formation of a variety of special benefit districts. These districts may be used to fund the construction of parks, libraries, Dolice or fire facilities, and street lighting systems to name a few. These districts may be formed by a vote of the property owners who then assess themselves for the cost of improvements. The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of debt service payments. City participation in a district of this type is possible to the extent of public improvements that would have otherwise been the responsibility of the City. However, the movement of capital improvements forward-in-time would require some concession from the developer in offsetting interest, -72- debt issue, or other additional costs. Revenue Bonds: The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to finance improvements related to utility functions or other City services that generate a fee for service, although other City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. If public improvements are being installed ahead of schedule to accommodate a developer, the City would expect the developer to offset many of the costs of such an issue as described above. Tax Increment Bonds: Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can be financed through the use of tax increment bonds. The Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for the construction of public improvements using this method of financing. A developer asking for public improvements to be constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agency's ability and willingness to defer other projects. Certificates of Participation: certain public facilities such as buildings can be financed through Certificates of Participation. This is in effect a lease agreement between the City and another agency. A developer wishing to push projects forward might consider constructing facilities such as a library or fire station using this financing tool. The developer may be asked to bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of payment for certain improvements. General Obligation Bonds: The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bonds to fund the construction of public improvements. This can only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in an election. It is unlikely that the City will have the ability to use this method of funding public projects which benefit specific developments. -73- In the course of developing the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the following financing policies were identified: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultimate responsibility of the City to fund, however, the priority for funding projects is at the discretion of the City Council. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program will play a significant role in helping to establish compliance with the adopted preformance standards. Priority for the funding of projects should go to infill areas or areas of the city where existing deficiencies exist. Agree to consider assisting developers with credits against future fees, reimbursement agreements, forming assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly in the public interest to do so or to rectify public facility deficiencies and not to induce growth by prematurely upgrading public facilities. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangements will be made based on the city's plans for timing of certain public facilities. For example, if a developer wanted to put in an improvement that the City had not planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify an existing deficiency, the City would not consider beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until the 5th year, if at all. Recognize that public facility improvements made up- front or ahead of City plans by developers must provide the funds necessary to cover annual operating costs for the facility until the time the City had previously planned to provide the facility. With the recent reduction in residential densities and overall restriction on residential development, recognize that it may be necessary to start charging fees to commercial and industrial land uses in cases where they are not presently assessed. For example, commercial and industrial developments do not pay school or park fees although they will increasingly impact these facilities. With the reduction in residential land uses and density, it may be necessary to charge commercial and industrial to make up the deficit. At a future date, consider directing staff to conduct a financial analysis of the Public Facilities Fee to determine its adequacy in terms of cash flow and method of calculation in light of the overall Growth Management Program. -74- CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT FUTURE PUBLIC FACILITIES LIST COST EST. DESCRIPTION FUND (000 1s) GOVERNMENT FACILITIES ------.-.------------- *City Hall *FIRE STATION #3 Relocation - Calavera *FIRE STATION #5 Public Safety Center *FIRE STATION #6 Rancho Santa Fe *LIBRARY Additional 84,600 sq. *Public Safety Ctr PARKS Alga Norte *Calavera Hills Cannon Lake *Leo Carrillo *Macario Canyon NE Quadrant Non-Determined Sites *Senior Citizen Center Special Use Areas Additional 10.7 acres *SW Quadrant ----- PFF 4,000 425 11 1,950 590 ft. 11 10,593 3 , 400 $20,958 Hills I1 11 11 ------_-- PFF 11 11 I1 11 I1 I1 11 I1 11 DRAINAGE PROJECTS ** DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 9 DISTRICT 10 DISTRICT 11 DISTRICT 12 DISTRICT 13 ----------I------ Drainage Fee/Gross Acre = $ 0 PLD 11 11 0 11 $ 3,808 $ I1 11 $ 1,686 I1 11 $ 2,658 I1 11 $ 200 11 $ 2,273 I1 I1 $ 1,196 11 I1 $ 1,630 11 I1 $ 4,445 11 I1 $ 2,858 11 11 11 11 0 I1 $ 2,878 $ 11 3 , 531 2,270 650 14 , 000 4 , 225 4 , 225 1,679 368 4,225 $37 , 173 2,000 --------- $30 , 387 ......................................................................... * Part or all of these projects are in the adopted five year Capital Improvement Program. See the 1986-91 CIP for details. ** SOURCE: Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, June 1980 Costs have been adjusted to 1986 dollars per the Pipeline/Concrete Index (24.6%). -75- CITY OF CARLSBAD FUTURE PUBLIC FACILITIES LIST PROJECT DESCRIPTION COST EST. FUND (000 1s) SEWER PROJECTS ** -------------- *ENCINA TREAT. PLANT Phases IV h V *CALAVERA HILLS PLANT UPGRADE TRUNK LINES * Area 1 - BUENA VISTA * Area 2 - NORTHWEST CITY Area 3 - CALAVERA HILLS Area 4 - NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA * Area 5 - SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA Area 6 - PALOMAR AIRPORT Area 7 - NORTH BATIQUITOS Area 1 - BUENA VISTA Area 2 - NORTHWEST CITY Area 3 - CALAVERA HILLS * Area 4 - NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA Area 5 - SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA Area 6 - PALOMAR AIRPORT Area 7 - NORTH BATIQUITOS Area 2 - NORTHWEST CITY Area 3 - CALAVERA HILLS Area 4 - NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA Area 5 - SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA Area 6 - PALOMAR AIRPORT Area 7 - NORTH BATIQUITOS UPGRADE PUMP STATION JOINT FACILITIES Area 1 - BUENA VISTA (Carlsbadls share) Sewer 11 II 11 11 II I1 II 11 I1 II II II II I1 11 I1 11 II II II II I1 I1 13,070 5,240 25 810 0 590 970 0 0 0 435 0 765 1,750 0 0 350 2,190 0 0 3,230 13 5 0 $29,560 --------_ NOTE : GRAND TOTAL SAN MARCOS (WATER/SEWER) - Existing facilities are adequate to buildout. LEUCADIA (SEWER) - Specific projects and costs are detailed in the Districts Master Plan. OLIVENHAIN WATER - 11 COSTA REAL WATER - II ......................................................................... * Part or all of these projects are in the adopted five year Capital Improvement Program. See the 1986-91 CIP for details. ** SOURCE: City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan, April 1985. -76- CITY OF CARLSBAD FUTURE PUBLIC FACILITIES LIST PROJECT CIRCULATION FWY INTERCHANGE FWY INTERCHANGE FWY INTERCHANGE CANNON ROAD BRIDGE CARLSBAD BLVD EL CAMINO REAL FARADAY JEFFERSON STR MIS CE LLANE OUS PALOMAR AIRPORT RD *PALOMAR AIRPORT RD PALOMAR AIRPORT RD *PALOMAR AIRPORT RD PALOMAR AIRPORT RD POINSETTIA TAMARACK *TAMARACK *TRAFFIC SIGNALS ----------- *CANNON ROAD ALGA ROAD ALGA ROAD *EL CAMINO REAL *EL CAMINO REAL *EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL EL FUERTE STREET *LA COSTA AVENUE LA COSTA AVENUE LA COSTA AVENUE *LA COSTA AVENUE *LA COSTA AVENUE OLIVENHAIN ROAD OLIVENHAIN ROAD OLIVENHAIN ROAD OLIVENHAIN ROAD OLIVENHAIN ROAD OLIVENHAIN ROAD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD @ Poinsettia Lane @ Palomar Airport Rd @ La Costa Avenue 1-5 to Faraday East of ECR Median, Tamarack to Elm Medians Cannon to Koll Property 1-5 to Marron Railroad bridge widening College to Paseo del Norte West of ECR, median half East of ECR, Airport Intersection with Carlsbad Blvd Railroad Bridge Widening 1-5 to Carlsbad Blvd Adams to Highland 61 Intersections E/B right, W/B right turn lanes a 2 thru lanes W/O ECR to E/O Alica N/B left turn lane at La Costa S/B thru lane N & S of La Costa S/B thru lane, Alga to La Costa S/B left turn lane at Levante N & S/B left,N/B right lanes at A W/B right turn lane at 1-5 Upgrade signal at RSF Intersection at RSF E/B left turn lane at ECR 2 thru lanes, 1-5 to ECR 4 lanes from Leucadia Blvd to ECR Upgrade signal at ECR 2 thru lanes at ECR Widen to 4 lanes, ECR to RSF 5 turn lanes at ECR Right turn lane at ECR 2 turn lanes at Melrose 3 turn lanes at C. Alvaro/Olivenh COST EST. mJND (000 1 s) BTD 5,740 11 5,870 6,261 PFF 3 , 128 I1 378 11 1,140 11 1,500 11 2,750 11 1,500 11 1,000 I1 3,000 I1 2,000 11 378 11 450 I1 3,000 11 900 I1 1,875 11 17 5 11 4,860 TIF 58 0 771 11 29 11 146 11 578 II 29 11 87 11 29 11 125 58 11 29 11 1,929 11 3,500 63 11 14 6 90 11 73 29 58 87 $53,818 II II 11 I1 11 I1 11 --------- ......................................................................... * Part or all of these projects are in the adopted five year Capital Improvement Program. See the 1986-91 CIP for details. -77- SECTION VIII. GROWTH MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM Concurrent with the creation of the Citywide Public Faciiities and Improvements Plan and the overall Growth Management Program for the City of Carlsbad, an information system was also ~ established to handle the wide variety of data that would be generated. The Information System was designed to operate initially on a stand-alone basis using the City’s personal computer facilities. Bowever, in its ultimate configuration, it would be operated as an element of a parcel-level Geographical Information System, or Geobase, which is currently being designed by the City’s Information Systems Department for implementation within a one to two year time frame. The relationship of the Growth Management Information System to the Geobase is described later in this section. Figure 20 provides a conceptual overview of the Growth Management Information System. A variety of data would be accepted as input into the system, such as Local Facility Management Plans acreage and population data, capital improvement information, and the ongoing status of development activity throughout the City. Whenever possible, these data would be supplied in computer-readible formats, however initially, it is likely that much of this information would have to be entered manually via the PC keyboard. The information supplied to the system would be used to generate long-term growth projections for the City and to estimate the amount and type of public facilities that will be needed to adequately support such growth. In addition, the system will also be used for a number of other purposes. For example, it will aid in analyzing each of the 25 Local Facility Management Plans for compliance with the Citywide Plan; will maintain data as to how specific facilities are scheduled to be phased over time; and will store details as to how the proposed funding mechanisms would function within and between zones. Output would be made available in the form of reports, charts, graphs and random inquiries, as well as via maps for each of the eleven public facility categories addressed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Figure 21 depicts the geographical “entities. for which data will be maintained within the system. At the highest level, information will be maintained on a Citywide basis. At the next level, the City has been divided for planning purposes into four quadrants (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest and Southeast). Geographically, these quadrants are defined by the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. In addition, a number of Special Districts exist to provide specific services to the area, and the Information System has -78- been designed to store and maintain information discretely for those portions of the following Special Districts which lie within the City: Water: Costa .Real Municipal Water District Olivenhain Municipal Water District San Marcos County Water District Sewer : Leucadia County Water District San Marcos County Water District Schools: Carlsbad Unified School District Encinitas Union Elementary School District San Dieguito Union High School District San Marcos Unified School District Information relative to the Special Districts was provided to each District at the time that the City's overall Growth Management Program and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan was presented and explained. In the future, updates will be forwarded to the Districts on a regular basis so that long-range facilities planning for the entire City can occur using comparable data and assumptions. Additionally, several other entities have also been defined within Carlsbad for which the same types of data will be maintained, including the following: -- Sewer Master Plan Areas -- Drainage Districts -- Coastal Zone At the lowest level of detail, the Growth Management Program has divided the City into 25 Local Facility Management Zones for which facilities and improvements plans will be prepared. These zones represent the lowest level of information that will be stored and maintained in the system. When the aforementioned Geobase becomes operational, detailed information will be available for each of the 19,000+ parcels that currently exist within the City. until that time, however, the finest level of geographical information that will be generated by the Growth Management Information System will be for the 25 individual local zones. A host of information will be made available via the City's Growth Management Information System. This information can be grouped into two broad categories: land use projections and -79- public facility data. Land use projection data would include the following: -- Acreage Gross Fully Constrained 25 - 40% Slopes ' Net Developable -- Dwelling Units: Buildout Existing Approved Remaining -- Population: Buildout Existing Based on Approved Units Based on Remaining Units -- Indust./Coml.: Buildout Existing Approved Remaining The land use projection information listed above will be used to determine the type and amount of public facilities that would be required at buildout for each of the categories listed below: -- Facilities: Sewer Water Drainage Circulation Fire Administrative Facilities Parks Library Schools Open Space The types of data that will eventually be available when Local Facility Management Plans are submitted and approved for each of the facilities within each of the geographical entities is as follows: -- Information: Existing Capacity/Status Ultimate Demand Existing Demand Approved Demand Remaining Demand versus Capacity Some of this information can be most effectively displayed using tables, charts, or graphs, while other portions of it would lend itself most effectively to display using maps. Figure 22 -80- provides a conceptual overview of how these data would be made available, and Figure 23 shows the specific formats or media types that would be suitable for displaying the information that will be available via the system. In its ultimate configuration, the Growth Management Information System would operate as an element of a centralized Geographical Information System, or Geobase, see Figure 24. The Geobase would contain a file of information keyed to individual parcels within the City. By combining these parcel files using different geographical configurations, the parcel-level information can be aggregated upward into Local Facility Management Zones, Special Districts, quadrants, or Citywide reports. This concept, which is shown in Figure 25, would represent no visible change to the end user, in that the data and reports would be essentially the same as those generated today via the Growth Management Information System. With -a Geobase System, however, a much wider array of information will be available, and the level of detail will be at the most basic entity, namely individual parcels. This capability will, in turn, make possible a number of other applications, such as a Permit Tracking System, and will also provide an opportunity to interact with other data bases or systems. -81- FIGURE 20 SEPTEMBER 18, 108e Zone Phasing Plans Q Acreage and Population Data Capital Improvement Data / / Developmental ActMty Data ............ ............ f I n ..--*.* Periodic Reports I( i \\ \. \ \ Annual \mwth Monitoring Reportj I i ! I , I i I i ! i I I I I I i I \ city of Carlsbad -82- FIGURE 21 SEPTEMBER 10. 1986 I I 1 City Quadrants (4) 1 Special Districts/Other 1 (34) Management Zones I (25) ENTITY LEVELS City of Carkbad -83- - FIGURE 22 SEPTEMBER 16. ioee &-Demand Reports /-----71 /' WP8 \ /I/ ............ ............ *----** / / /' e\ I \ Periodic Reporb li- Charts/Qraphs I ! I , I \ Annual \ SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 FIGURE 23 DATA AVAILABXLITY Data Typ e Available Foxmats LAND USE PROJECTIONS Acreage : Gross Fully Constrained 25-40% Slopes Net Developable Dwelling Units: Bu ildou t Existing Approved Remaining Population: Buildout Existing Based on Appvd. Units Based on Remain. Units Indust./Coml. (sq. ft. 1 : Buildout Existing Approved Remaining Tables X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X Tables CITYWIDE FACILITIES City Awn. Facil. (sq ft): Buildout X Existing X Standard Reqd. Today X standard Reqd. 5 Yrs. X status Today - Status in 5 Yrs. - Library (sq ft) : B uildou t X Existing X Standard Reqd. Today X Standard Reqd. 5 Yrs. X Status Today - Status in 5 Yrs. - Charts/ Graphs X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Graphs X X X X X X X X X X X X Reports X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Y Reports X X X X X X X X X X X X Inuuiry X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Inquiry X X X X - - X X X X - - city of Carlsbad -85- Inauirv - Tables Graphs Maps Reports Wastewater Treat. Capacity: Buildout EDUs Existing Flows (EDU) Existing Capacity (EDU) Flows in 5 Yrs. (EDU) Status Today X X X X - X X X X - - X X X X X - X X - X X X - - - QUADRANT FACILITIES Parks (ac): Buildout E xi sting Standard Reqd. Today standard Reqd. 5 Yrs. status Today Status in 5 Yrs. X X X X MANAGEMENT ZONE FACILITIES Drainage: Status Today 1 Circulation (Road Seg. or Intsctn.): Off-peak Service Level Peak Service Level Zones Involved Status Today Status in 5 Yrs. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire: Stations at Buildout Existing Stations Status Today Status in 5 Yrs. X X X X X X X X X X X X Open Space (ac) : Buildout Existing Status Today X X - X X X X X X X X X X X - SPECIAL DISTRICT FACILITIES Schools : Schools at Buildout Existing Schools Status Today District OK? X X X X X X X X X X X X X - - - X X X - ' Available when Traffic Impact Fee Study is completed for entire City - January 1987. -86- Tables sewer Collection System (Trunk Line Capacity-MGD): Buildout X Existing Flows X Existing Capacity X Status Today X District OK? X Water Distribution System (Line Capacity 1 : Buildout X Existing Flows X Existing Capacity X Status Today X Storage Cap. (days) X D is t r ict OK? X Graphs Maps Reports X X X X X X X X X X X X X - - Inquiry -87- FIGURE 24 SEPTEMBER 18, lgag hwth Management Infomation System Pemit Tracking System ............ ............ ............ ............ *-. a * Other Systems or Programs RELATIONSHIP TO -88- City of carlsbad FIGURE 25 SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 1 City Quadrants I M8nagement Zones I I / / \ -89- City of Carlsbad SECTION IX. APPLICABILITY TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE (SECTION 21.90 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE) AS stated in the overview, the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan implements a portion of the City's Growth Managementnrdinance. For more detailed information regarding the purpose and intent of the citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, exceptions to the plan and preparation and processing requirements for Local Facility Management Plane, Municipal Code Section 2190 should be referenced and reviewed. Any request for amendment to the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan shall be processed and considered in the same fashion as a request to amend the City's General Plan. The provisions of State Government Code Section 65358 regarding General Plan Amendments shall also apply to amendments to the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. If any Local Facility Management Plan proposes a deviation to the Citywide Plan, an amendment to the Citywide Plan must be considered first along with an analysis of how such amendment would impact the other twenty-four zones. -90- 11 12 24 25 i I AN ORDINANCE OF 'WE CITY COUYCIL OF TuE CITY CF CAFLSBAD, C.ALIPoFVIA APfEE:DI?:C. TTTLE 21 CF TU^ CAFLSPAD WNICIPAL CODE PY WE .mrrTroN CF CHAPTEF 21.90 ESTABLISHING A GROKTP WKAGEE~F?;T PROCFAM FOR THE CITY The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California I does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition cf Chapter 21.90 to read as follows: "Chapter 21.90 Growth Manaaerent Sect ions: 21.90.010 21.90.020 21.90.030 21.90.031 21.90.032 21.90.033 21.90.040 21.90.050 21.90.060 21.90.070 21.90.080 21.90.090 21.90.100 21.90.110 21.90.120 21.90 . 125 21.90.130 21.90.140 21.90.150 21.90.160 21.90.170 21.90.180 21.90.190 Purnose and intent. Definitions. General prohibition, exceptions. Tolling of time for consideration of applications submitted before the effective date of this chapter. Tollina of expiration of previou'sly issued development permits . Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. ComDliance with this chapter reauired. Establishment of local facilities manaaefient fee. Special provisions for buildinq permits issued during temporary moratorium. Finding of health, safety and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. Performance standard. Citywide facilities and irprovements plan. Local facilities management zones. Contents of local facility manaqement plans. Facilities management Dlan DreDartion. Facilities manaoement plan Drocessina. Implementation of facilities and imDrovements reauirements. Obligation to Day fees or install improvements reauired by any other law. Implementing guidelines. Exclusions . Council actions, fees, not ice. Expiration of chapter. Severability. 1. 0 18 i/ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21.90.010 PurDcse and intent. (a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad e: 1. (1) Provide cuality housina ODDortunities fzr (2) Provide a balanced comunitv with adecLate economic sectors of the comunity; commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas ts support the residential areas of the City; meeting City standards are available concurre~t with the neec! created by new development; (4) Balance the housina needs of the recion against the public service needs of Carlsbad residents and available fiscal and environmental resources: areas before allowina extensions of public facilities and improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized: the Carlsbad qeneral plan: facilities and imDrovements are provided in a phased and logical fashion as reauired by the general plan; development by tying the pace of development to the provision of DUbliC facilities and improvements at the times established by the citywide facilities and improvements plan. determined despite previous City Council actions includina but not limited to, amendments to the land use, housinq, and parks and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic imDact fees, and modification of park dedication and improvement reauirements, that the demand for facilities and improvements has outpaced the supply resultina in shortages in public facilities and improvements, includinq but not limited to streets, parks, open space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general governmental facilities. The City Council has further determine that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure that no development occurs without providing for adeauate facilities and improvements, to requlate the pace of development thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of years and to continue the auality of life for all economic sectors of the Carlsbad community. (d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and objectives established herein by reauirina identification of al: public facilities and improvements reauired for development, by prohibiting development until adeauate provisions for the public facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects within the City, and by givina development priority to areas of the City where public facilities and improvements are already ir place (infill areas). (3) Ensure that public facilities and ivproverent (5) Encourage infill developpent in urbanitec! (6) Ensure that all development is consistent wit (7) Prevent qrowth unless adeauate public (8) Control of the timing and location of (b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has (c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the 2. 1 /i I/ 2 l~ 5 18 1; 19 il 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 (e) This chanter replaces the temaorarv rorat3ril:- T- processing and approval of developvent projects kposed sv ziti.. Council Ordinance KO. 9791. 21.90.020 Definitions. (a) Whenever the following terms are used in this chapter they shall have the meaning established by this secticr! unless from the context it is apparent that another reanina is intended: (1) "Citywide facilities and improverents plan" means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.091 identifying those facilities and improvements reauired on a citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City 3s established by the general plan and providina an outline and budget for financing certain facilities and improverents which will be provided by the City. entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative actions such as zone chanqes, qeneral plan amendments, or master plan approval or amendment. put, building or other alteration of land and construction incident thereto . (4) "Facilities" means any schools, parks, open space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire, library, or governvental services, identified in a facilities management plan. streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, bridges, overcrossinas, street interchanaes, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and lighting facilities. (6) "Local facilities management plan" means a facilities manaaement plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a local facilities management zone which is established according to 'Section 21.90.100. (2) "Development permit" means any pemit, (3) "Development" means any use to which land is (5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls, 21.90.030 General prohibition, exceptions. (a) Unless exemDted by the provisions of this chapter no application for any building- permit or development permit shall be accepted, processed or approved until a citywide facilities and improvements plan has been adopted and a local facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities management zone has been submitted and approved according to thi! chapter . (b) No zone change, general plan amendment, master plai amendment or specific plan amendment which would incease the residential density or development intensity established by the general plan in effect on the effective date of this chapter shall be approved unless an amendment to the citywide facilities management plan and the applicable local facilities manaaement plan has first been approved. 3. L subs Deve shal faci (c) The classes of projects or pernits listed I? ti's ection shall be exemDt from the provisions of suDsecticr s . lopment permits and buildinu permits for these DroJects 1 be subject to any fees established pursuant tc the cltvw:-+ lities and improverent plan and any applicable local facilities management plan. (1) Redevelopment projects. (2) Projects consisting of the construction or I owned by the family intendinq to OCCUPY the structure, or nct to exceed one nonowner-OccuDied house -&r individual for one or more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986. (3) Building permits and final maps €or proiects identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (Drojects fcr which construction had commenced and were desiunated on the FZD narked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 "as developina"). required development pernits were issued or approved on or befori January 21, 1986. If all reauired development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. (5) Building pemits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved before July 20, 1986 and for which building permits could .have been issued under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. approved development permits or with a complete application on file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. New permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be processed and approved. ' (7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures and uses for youth recreational, educational or guidance prooram: such as boys and girls clubs or private schools. necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or services and which are initiated by the City Council or Planning Comnission. projects without accommodations for permanent employees are exempt from the provisions of this chapter unless the City Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to impact public facilities. located in the northwest auadrant of the City as defined in Ordinance No. 9791. Ruildina permits for commercial or industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may be approved. Residential building permits will not be approved for lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this 4. (4) Ruilding permits for projects for which all (6) Covrercial and industrial projects with (8) Zone changes or general plan amendments (9) Public utility facilities and improvement (10) Adjustment plats. (11) Development permits for minor subdivisions 9 I1 I/ management plan is approved or, two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but the approv:; of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local facilities management plan. The expiration period of those tentative maps and tentative parcel maps, and any other development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements plan is approved, whichever occurs first. (e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c) 10 I1 date all development permits for those projects shall be fully subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for projects listed in subsection (c) (31, (41, (51, and (6) .shall apply only so long as the facilities and improvements required as a condition to the issuance of final development permits have been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement agreement shall subject any remaining building permits for the project to the provisions of subsection (a). subsection (c) (31, (41, (51, (6) and (7) which comply with all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 may be approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate, after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be subject to the exemption of subsection (c). (9) The City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on building permits and development permits for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986 subject to the following restrictions: (1) The City Council finds that the facilities anc improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to meet the needs created by the project and that the master plan developer has agreed to install those facilities and improvementsi to the satisfaction of the City Council. (f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in 5. 11 12 231 24 I 'I 1 /I i 2 ii I i 23 24 5 6 91 I' 10 /I 11 12 (2) The master plan developer shall acree :- writing that all facilities and improvement reauirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established ;\' the citywide facilities and manaqement plan and the ap?licab15 local facilities manaaement plan shall be apDlicable to development within the master plan area and that the master pljn I developer shall comply with those plans. park and all uses within the park comprise an intearal part cf the educational facility. portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the applicant has provided written evidence that an educational entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent of the approved master plan. Phase I the master plan developer shall have aqreed to participate in the restoration of a siqnif icant lagoon and wetland resource area and made any dedications of property necessary to accomplish the restoration. (h) After making the findings in paragraph 1 the City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on master plans subject to the reauirements of paragraph 2. After the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h) (iv) the tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and building permits for construction of the golf course and first phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed and approved . The processing and approval of all other developments and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti: after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities management plan have been adopted by the City Council. (l)(i) That the master plan will provide all necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any facilities deficits in the area affected by the project. (ii) That the approval will not prejudice the preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the level of public facilities and services in the area. (iii) That by the dedication of land and the construction of public improvements the project will make a significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of sianif icant environmental resources. (2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the information required by and implementing the provisions of Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the master plan. facilities and improvement requirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide (3) The master plan establishes an educational (4) Building pernits for the 129 unit residential (5) Prior to the approval of the final map for (ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that a1 6. 11 /i 12 il 23 24 5 18 !! facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities manaqement plan shall be applicable to develoFv?-t within the master plan area and that the master plan develcner shall comply with those requirements. participate in the restoration of a siqnificant laqoon and wetland resource area. the applicant shall grant an easement over the proDerty necessary, for the lagoon restoration and the riqht-of-way necessary €or the' widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino Real. (iii) The master plan applicant shall acree to (iv) Prior to any processing on the Faster plan L 21.90.031 Tollina of time for consideration of applications submitted before the effective date of this chapter. After approval of the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities manaqement plan applications for development permits which were accepted as complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date. Until the approval of the plans all applicable time limits for processing the development permits shall be tolled. 21.90.032 Tollina of expiration of Dreviously issued development permits. If a discretionary development permit, other than a development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map, issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within which building permits must be issued and the issuance of building permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter then the expiration period shall be tolled until the aDplicable local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. 21.90.033 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. After amroval of an applicable local facilities management plan 'an extension of'the expiration date of any development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is found to be consistent with the plan. The decision makinq body considering an extension may condition the extension upon compliance with the citywide plan and applicable local facilities management plan. 21.90.040 Compliance with this chapter. (a) No develoDment permit shall be approved unless the approving'authority finds that the permit is consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving authority may impose any condition to the approval necessary to implement the plans. (b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees required by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities manaqement plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consisten 7. 5 18 1' 19 ' i I il 20 I! with the applicable local facilities management plan. AS 3 condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to Section 2L.90.030(c) the applicant shall aaree to pay the appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is established. (c) The requirements of this chapter are imposed as a condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation cf and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public , health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and improvements will be installed to serve new developrent prior tc or concurrently with need. 21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities manaaerrent - fee. (a) A local facilities managernent fee is hereby established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in local facilities management plan which are related to new development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building permit or development permit. .The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvements plan attributed to development within the local zone which are not financed by other means. The facilities management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as necessary to accommodate additional development within the applicable local facilities management zone plus the estimated cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone. The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development. any other means of financing facilities or improvements identified by a local facilities management plan or any other tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed on'the development of property under the provisions of state law this code or City Council policy. management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a public hearing, published notice of which shall be aiven according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Government Code Section 54992. permit application submitted after the effective date of this chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by this section at the time a building permit is issued. at the time of issuance of a building permit. - (b) The fee required by this section is in addition to (c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities (d) As a condition of any building or development (e) The fee established by this section shall be levie 21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits issued durinq temporary moratorium. (a) Applicants for projects for which building permits were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shal 8. I 11 I; li 12 j/ I 24 23 I 27 I! pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 cays aft~r the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. zay-e-: shall be made according to the agreement executed by the applicant-pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.070 Finding of health, safetv and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. (a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of ~ the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not Daid or the facilities or improvements are not installed the public health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No. 17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter. development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o the protest. (c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Cod Section 65913.5. (b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a 21.90.080 Performance standard. The City Council shall adopt general performance standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section 21.90.090(b) or 21.90.110(c). Specific performance standards fo citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards for each zone shall be adopted as part of the local facilities management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local facilities management plan the performance standards established by a plan are not met then no development permits or building permits shall be issued within the local zone until the performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have been made. 21.90.090 City wide facilities and improvements plan. (a) To implement the City's general plan by securing provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that development does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning: specify size, capacity and service level performance standards for the identified facilities and improvements; establish specific time tables for acauisition, installation and operation of the facilities and improvements correlated to projected population 9. I I' of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order td establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or 21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule. (d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the plar to the City Council not later than one year from the effective date of this ordinance. 10 'i ! 11 11 12 ll 26 11 27 [/ I! 28 /I 10. (e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the P?a?.lni-.C Commission or City Council. 21.90.100 Local facilities manaaement zones. (a) The City Council shall divide the City into facilities management zones. based upon logical facilities and improvements plannina, construction and service relationships to ensure the economically efficient and timely installation of reauired facilities and improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council shall also be guided by the following considerations: in place or available: (b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established I (1) Service areas or drainage basins: (2) Extent to which facilities or irnprovepents arc (3) Ownership of property: (4) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans: (5) Boundaries of pendina zoning master plans: (6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master plan areas: (7) Boundaries of approved tentative maps: (8) Public facilities relationships, especially the relationship to the City's planned major circulation network : (9) Special district service territories: (10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other (c) The zones shall be established by resolution after facilities or improvement master plans. a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section 21.54.060(2) of this code. 21.90.110 Contents of local facility manaqenent plans. (a) A local facilities management plan shall be prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. (b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, an( narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan approval. The local facilities manaaement plan shall be consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan an( shall implement the citywide facilities and improvements plan within the zone. when the following facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate development within the zone will be installed or financed as specified in subsection (d). (c) The facilities management plan shall show how and (1) Sewer systems (2) Water (3) Drainage (4) Circulation (5) Fire facilities (6) Schools (7) Parks and other recreational facilities (8) Open space 11. 1: capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortaues in other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the performance standard which is established pursuant to Sect ion 21.90.080. The growth inducing impact of the out of zone improvements shall be assessed. installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space, etc. 1 for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not utilize more than the area's prorata share of facility or improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of development within the zone and a market data and cash flow analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those situations when demand exceeds capacity and it is not feasible tc increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the capacity is established in the plan. (3) A financing plan establishing various methods of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plar fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order tc establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or 21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule, Where facilities or improvements are required for more than one zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, shall not require identical funding methods. (2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for !I 3 ': 4 /I 11 j; 22 91 I' 10 'I il u 19 I! .I I/ 20 I, !I I 12. (1 li I' 2; 31 I' 11 4 'I management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the property owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata according to acreage and development potential . .(c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a facilities management plan . (d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilities management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group of cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. After a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the c 1, u 18 1, I I 23 I 24 (4) A list or schedule of facilities recuire-e-Es correlated to individual development projects within tr.e zone. establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities 2~2 improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvement plan attributable to development of property on t!?e local facilities management zone. (3) The local facilities management plan shall 21.90.125 Facilities management plan processinq. (a) Facilities manaaement plans shall be reviewed according to the following procedure: complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing fee in an amount established by City Council resolution, may be submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the (1) A completed facilities management plan 13. /I !i 2 i( City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with ' the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within the facility zone. (4) When the Planning Commission action is filed with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). (5) The City Council shall hear the matter, and after considering the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny a facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to impose on development projects within the zone in order to implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the ll 4 ,I (c) A local facilities management plan shall be considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code. Environmental documents should be processed concurrently with the plan. Implementation of facilities and imorovehents, 21.90.130 (a) To ensure that the provisions of this chapter and reauirements. the general plan are met the following shall apply: development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless provision for all facilities and improvements related to the development project are provided or funded. (2) No building permit shall be issued unless all applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees, facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewer fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities management plan and adopted by the City Council have first been paid or provision for their payment has been made to the satisfaction of the City Council. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter nc I 10 \I ll rd 27 ii 28 I/ 27 1, 20 ii /I li (b) The citywide facilities and improvercent i la^ the local facility manaaement plan process is part of :?.e C;:Y~S ongoing pl-anning effort. It is anticipated that amendr.ents ta the plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities manacenent plan does not establish any entitlement or riaht to any particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular ' development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or I improvements will be available to meet demands created by development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and improvements. the City Manager that facilities or improvements within a facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodatc any further development within that zone or that the performance standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being wei he shall immediately report the deficiency to the Council. If the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further building or development permits shall be issued within the affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an amendment to the citywide facilities and improvements plan or applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the deficiency is approved by the City Council and the performance standard is met. activity for each local facilities management zone and shall prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps, graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a developmental activity analysis, a facilities and improvements adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and recommendation for any amendments to the facilities management plan. The content of the annual report shall be established by the City Council. facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the City's capital improvement budget. I (c) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of (d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen' (e) The City Council shall annua1l.y review the citywidc 21.90.140 Obliqation to pay fees or install Nothina in this chapter shall be construed as improvements rewired by any other law. relieving a buiider, developer or subdivider from any public improvement requirement, dedication requirement or fee requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21 of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy. 21.90.150 Implementinq guidelines. The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems necessary to implement this chapter . 21.90.160 Exclusions. (a) Development proposals which consist of facilities, 15. or structures constructed by a city, county, special distrlc:, state, or federal government or any agency, departnent, or subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded frr the provisions of this chapter. This exclusion shall not apo:I: to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax weL: -1 be applicable. I accepted before August 6, 1985 Fay be approved without complyinz 1 with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other 1 development permits or building permits for the project shall be subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map shall be subject to Section 21.90.030. (b) Tentative maps the application for which was 21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice. (a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision shall be accomplished by a resolution. processing fees for the submission and processing of facilities management plans and for any other request made under Section 21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140. (c) Whenever written notice is required to be given to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll. (b) The City Council shall establish application and 21.90.180 Expiration of chapter. This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless it is extended or reenacted on or before that date. 21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in thi chapter and each section, subsection, sentence , clause and phras thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following ’ findings: 1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of it General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council Included in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were recommendations that no new development should occur unless 16. adequate public facilities are available concurrently wit? neec to serve the new development. - 2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interir Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on developmen approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. Cn April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. 17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic inpact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure adequate public facilities are available to serve any new development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the requirements imposed by it, adeauate public facilities may not b available to serve new development or building. Development or building without public facilities is contrary to the City General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and safety. 3. This action of the City Council is consistent with long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and drainage facilities, sufficient fire protection and recreation facilities. 4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition, development of housing for low and moderate income persons and families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are designated for highest development priority. By encouraging development of inf ill areas first , where the infrastructure is already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced. 5. Because any new development affects public facility availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic will be used to provide public facilities on any new building in the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect th public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fir 17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplish effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify f I 0 18 I/ 20 i j 21 11 facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and recreational facilities. 18. I 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 22 i 23 19 20 24 25 I 21 I! I I PASSED - AND ADOPTED at a reuular meeting of said citt. Council held on the 1st day of July , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettinr NOES: None ABSENT: None City Attorney / U ATTEST : A. K- ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cl$rk 27 'I !I 2a 11 19. CJLRLSBJLD CIT? COUlCfL GROWTH MABAGENXWT PLAlD -Managing a Respon8ible and Progresaire Carlsbad Putare. will PLU I. Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan A. Growth Control Mapping and Planning Systems 1. 2. 3. 4. The General Plan will be utilized as the overall base map with a maximum residential utilization i.e. mean density. A citywide map will show all current and future - public facilities and improvements. Each public facility and improvement will also be shown separately on a citywide map. A citywide environmental constraints and open space map will be prepared. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants to show greater area detail. B. Management Performance Standards 1. Establish overall performance or adequacy standards for each public facility and improvement. 2. Establish thresholds for each public facility and improvement. C. Citywide Financing Options 1. Financing options will be identified for each facility and improvement. 2. Budgeting for citywide public facility and improvement will be in conjunction with the City's five year capital improvement budget. D. Citywide Plan 1. A Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will be prepared using growth control maps, performance standards and financing options. -1 - E. Development of Local facility Management and ~1annlr.y zones. 1. The 'City shall be divided into 25 specific zones. 2. The size of each zone shall depend upon major circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership boundaries, and ather identifiable characteristics. 3. The purpose of zones: a. Requires landowners to work together in order to present development plans in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. b. Requires landowners to provide development glans which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and to relate development to adjacent zones. c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to development approval. 4. Each zone will have a maximum residential utilization i.e. mean density. Specific densities for individual development plana within the zone, however, will be controlled through the normal planning process. 5. Each zone must conform to the General Plan and the Growth Management Ordinance. 11. Facility Management Zone Procesaing A. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for procesaing concurrently with normal environmental analysis. 8. Local facilitiea management plana shall conform to all standard8 of the Growth Control Happing and Planning ayatens and other existing City standards. C. The local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan to as8ure adequate funding of all citywide facilities and improvements identified in the citywide plan. The local plan shall also provide a detailed financial plan for all public facilitiea and improvements located within the local facilities management zone. All development within the local facilities management zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and improvement performance standarda. D. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan and environmental analyaia will be held concurrently. Notice to all landowners within the zone as well as surrounding adjacent zone landowners. -2- E. After the public hearing 1s completed on the local facilities management zone and environmental analysis, then the specific development plans will be processed 12 the normal method. p. Each local facilities management plan will be reviewed annually by the City to ensure that all performance standards are being met. If they are not, development will be stopped. 6/13/86 ad -3- APPENDIX II. RESOLUTION NO. 8796 21 '/ 3 FACILITY AND SERVICE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS TO BE USED IY 4 1; 51 WHEREAS, on July 1, 1986, the City Council adopted 6 'Ordinance No. 9808 which established a Growth Management Ordinance 7 for the City of Carlsbad: and A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MINOR REVISIONS TO THE PUBLIC IMPLEMENTING THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 9808 (GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE). I, I it I WHEREAS, one of the primary purposes of Ordinance No. I1 a I 9 9808 was to prevent growth unless adequate public facilities and 10 'services to serve the growth is provided when they are needed in a It and logical way: and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1986, the City Council adopted the 13 bublic Facility and Service Performance Standards to be used in 14ipreparing the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as part of 11 'I , 'I 11 15 //the Growth Management Program: and I' 16 il WHEREAS, these standards are being redefined or rephased 1 clarify the specific meaning and purpose of each: and I I I 18 ' WHEREAS, the intent of the original standards will remain 19 intact and that the clarified standards are needed to be able to 20 /adequately determine the timing for public facilities and services 21 kind to assess whether they are being provided in a phased and I8 22 11 kogical way; and WHEREAS, standards are needed to provide a mechanism to !I 23 Ii 24 bontinually monitor the adequacy of public facilities and services 25las growth occurs: and 26 11 WHEREAS, Section 21.90.080 of Ordinance No. 9808 requires I! I adoption by City Council Resolution of Performance Standards; i ! I i i I, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the I 2 ilCity of Carlsbad, California, that the Public Facility and ser~ice 3 #;Performance Standards as contained on attached Exhibit .A' are 4 hereby adopted and shall be used in the implementation of I If i; I, 6' 7ICatlsbad City Council held on the 23rd 8,11986 by the following vote, to wit: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 5 11 ,lOrdinance No. 9808 - The Carlsbad Growth Management Ordinance. day of September , /I I/ 9' AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine ii 10 I1 NOES: None ABSENT: None I' 20 /I 1; MARY H.JCASLER, Mayor 14 ;ATTEST: 1, 1511 I 2 16lkLETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City C1)rk ,I 21 I/ !I 23 I 24 11 22 1 25 ji 26 (( -2- Paci~ity/ScrPice City Administrative Facilities Library wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Systan Water Distribution System Standard 1500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. 800 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. Three acres of canmunity park or special use park per 1,000 population within the Park District, must be scheduled tor construction within a five year period.. Drainage facilities must be provided am required by the City concurrent with development. No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segmcnt or intersection aut of the zona which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off- peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted mans where 208 or more of the traffic generated by the local facility management zone will use the road segment or intersection. No mre than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute response time. Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non- ’ developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. School capacity to met projected enrollment withir the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must he provided prior to projected occupancy. Trunk line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate sewer district must be provided concurrent with development. Line capacity to mtet demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided am- current with development. A minimum 10 average day storage capacity must bs provided concurrent with davelopatent. APPENDIX 111. RESOLUTION NO. 8797 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBA3, IMPROVEMENTS PLAN TO BE USED WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 9808 (GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE). CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND WREREAS, on July 1, 1986, the City Council adopted I 6 Ordinance No. 9808 which established a Growth Management Program 7,'for the City of Carlsbad; and 8 9 9808 was to prevent growth unless adequate public facilities and 10~Iservices to serve the growth is provided when they are needed in a ll'iphased and logical way; and i' WHEREAS, one of the primary purposes of Ordinance Yo. !I 1 /I WHEREAS, the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan is I1 12 ii 13'Ithe first phase in the implementation of the Growth Management 14;Program and is needed to set the framework to allow Local Facility 15(panagement Plans to be submitted; and 16 11 WHEREAS, Section 21.90.090 of Ordinance No. 9808 requires 17ltthe adoption by City Council Resolution of a Citywide Facilities li // I I 1; 18 and Improvements Plan; I 19 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the 20 /City of Carlsbad, California, that the Citywide Facilities and dlmprovements Plan as contained on attached Exhibit *A* is hereby 22 lidopted and shall be used in the implementation of Ordinance No. 23 9808 - The Carlsbad Growth Management Ordinance. 24' I( /// 25 IT/// I I/ 11 I 27 26 //// v/// 28 il//// I I i i I ~ I I I I ! i 1 I I I I I I I i I 4~ I/ I1 I AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine MARY H,,/ CASLER, Mayor jl I -2- I APPENDIX IV. RESOLUTION NO. 8’98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, THE LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 9808 (GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE). CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF WHEREAS, on July 1, 1986, the City Council adopted I, I1 6 ‘Ordinance No. 9808 which established a Growth Management Program /I the City of Carlsbad; and g I/ WHEREAS, the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan 9,’has been completed as the first phase in the implementation of the I? I /I 1OIiGrowth Management Program; and WHEREAS, the second phase of the Growth Management 11 !I 11 I 12i.r.g”. will be the preparation and submittal of the Local 13;bacility Management Plans for each of the 25 zones; and I WHEREAS, Section 21.90.150 of Ordinance No. 9808 allows I 15‘/for the adoption of certain guidelines to assist in the 16 ,;implementation of the Growth Management Program; 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the 18;City of Carlsbad, California, that the Guidelines for the 19 ‘Preparation of the Local Facility Management Plans which are 20 /Incorporated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan are ‘I I! ereby adopted and shall be used in the implementation of 22 Iprdinance No. 9808 - The Carlsbad Growth Management Ordinance. 21 ip 23 p/ 24 lY/// 26 It !v/// ‘I 25 I?/// 27 I>/// ‘I I 6 I’ ‘i II 7 li 11 l2 13 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 23rd day of September , 1986 by the following vote, to wit: JALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City C\erk 1 I(SEAL)* 1 AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine 8 I! [ATTEST: 9 I! NOES: None ABSENT: None J,. e/. La.,_ 19 MARY Hd CASLER, Mayor 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- APPENDIX V. I I 1 ,/ RESOLUTION NO. 8799 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT FEE AS 1: 41 1 2 /I 3 AUTHORIZED IN ORDINANCE NO. 9808 (GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE). WHEREAS, on July 1, 1986, the City Council adopted I' 51 6 /,Ordinance No. 9808 llfor the City of Carlsbad; and 11 has been completed as the first phase in the implementation (process of the Growth Management Program; and which established a Growth Management Program WHEREAS, the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan 8 9 I' 10 I1 WHEREAS, the second phase of the Growth Yanagement program will be the review and evaluation of Local Facility lranagernent Plans as they are submitted for each of the 25 zones; 'and 11 11 12 /I 13 14 ' 11 15 11 WHEREAS, the review of the Local Facility Management !blans will ensure adequate public facilities to serve the growth 16 ij !uhen they are needed in a phased and logical way to comply with 17 11 the adopted performance standards; and 18 19 '4 20 1: WHEREAS, the funds required from this fee will be used in [relation to the cost of staff time, materials and supplies used, II :and specific consultants costs necessary to review the Local 21 I/ ikacility Management Plan; and 22 /I WHEREAS, the fee is established as a standard estimate 23 241blan, although, additional funds may be required or those funds remaining following the review and approval of the plan will be 26 I: refunded to the plan preparers; phe anticipated costs of reviewing a Local Facility Management 25 I 27 I I//// 28 I/ of 41 13 14 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o€ the 15 16 NOES: None ABSENT: None 17 IkTTEST: l8 &&?L i( RdA 19 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clebk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEAL) -2- I t i I I I ! I i ! I i j I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 ! I I I I i 1 I I ! i APPENDIX VI. 1' jl ii 12 !I I 3 II rowth Management Program; and WHEREAS, the second phase of the Growth Management P I program will be the preparation and submittal of the Local RESOLUTION NO. 23 24 8800 ontingencies Account. /// /// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSRAD, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE THE LOCAL PACILI?Y MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ZONES 1 THROUGH 6 AND APPROPRIATING $25,000 PROM THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCIES ACCOUNT IN PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the day of September , 2 il i,Carlsbad City Council held on the 33rd 3 !I 111986 by the following vote, to wit: 4 11 I AYES : Council Members Casler, NOES: None ABSENT: None 21 11 I Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine 7 I' !I 8 ii I/ 9l 10 iJ 1kTTEST : l2 ii( SEAL) 13 I !I 14 15 // 16 I' I/ 17 11 II ,I 25 1, -2- ! I I I ! I I ! I i I I ! I I I 1 i I I ! ! I i I I I I j I I I I