HomeMy WebLinkAbout; 2001 Underground Utility Advisory Committee; 2001 Underground Utility Advisory Committee; 2001-12-01REPORT OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
2001 UNDERGROUND UTILITY
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Goal 1
Purpose ofthe Report 1
The 20A Funding Program Background 1
Current Fiscal Status of 20A Funds 2
City of Carlsbad Underground Utility Advisory Committee 2
Priority Point System 4
Conclusions • ^
APPENDIX
A Rule 20 of the San Diego Gas & Electric Company
B Chapter 11.08 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
C Meeting Summaries of the 2001 Underground Utility Advisory Committee
D Priority List
E Priority Area Boundary Map
F City Map of Overhead Utility Locations (in pocket at back of report)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REPORT OF THE
2001 UNDERGROUND UTILITY ADVISIORY COMMITTEE
GOAL
The goal of the committee was to maintain a pro-active position on the undergrounding of
utilities and establish a four-year priority list for the Rule 20A Funding Program, which is a
program instituted by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in 1983 that requires
the San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) to fund the replacement of its existing
overhead electric facilities with underground facilities.
PURPOSE OF REPORT
This report will provide information on the following:
> Review the background and policies of the 20A funding program
> Provide the current fiscal status of the City's 20A funds
> Describe the formation and purpose of the Underground Utility Advisory Committee
> Identify priority projects to be undergrounded with 20A funds
THE 20A FUNDNG PROGRAM BACKGROUND
In 1983, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) instituted the Rule 20A Funding
Program, attached as Appendix A, which provides that certain funds are set aside each year by
San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) to pay for the undergrounding of existing utility
lines. The amount of money Carlsbad receives each year is based on a formula derived from
the number of overhead service-meters in the City of Carlsbad in proportion to the number of
overhead service meters throughout-the SDG&E service area.
Rule 20A states that SDG&E will replace- the" existing overhead electric facilities with
underground facilities after the City of Carlsbad has:
"Determined, after consultation with tfie utility company, and after liolding public
hearings on the subject, that such undergrounding is in the general public
interest for one ormore ofthe following reasons:
0 Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead utilities.
0 The street or road right-of-way is extensively used by the general public and
carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic and:
0 The street or road or right-of-way adjoins or passes through a civic area or
public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general
public."
The 20A funding program covered most of the cost for undergrounding the SDG&E lines within
the public right-of-way including both design and construction. In addition. Pacific Bell and
Daniels Cablevlsion undergrounded their lines in the area (if applicable) at no cost to the City.
The funding did not, however, cover the cost for the customer sen/ice side undergrounding from
the end of the street public right-of-way to the customers service point. That cost was borne by
the property owner. This presented a financial burden to the property owners, which at times
could deter areas of the City from becoming part of an underground conversion program.
In 1999, the CPUC revised the 20A funding policy to include the cost of undergrounding from
the right-of-way to the customer sen/ice box, if the governing City elected to include the
provision in the contract. Although each project should be evaluated separately prior to
incorporating the new policy, the possibility of eliminating the sen/ice installation cost to the
property owners will promote/increase the acceptance of the project by the property owners.
CURRENT FISCAL STATUS OF 20A FUNDS
Each year SDG&E makes an allocation of their total budget for Rule 20A to each city and
county The allocation to the City of Carlsbad in the calendar year 2001 amounted to $204,453.
In addition, there was an allocation balance of $42,902 as of December 31, 2000. Therefore,
the total amount currently available is $247,355.
It is possible for the City to borrow up to two years in advance on the future 20A funds.
Since approximately $200,000 will be available to the City each calendar year, approximately
$400,000 can be advanced and added to the $247,355 which is on hand.
The current cost for utility undergrounding is estimated by SDG&E at one million dollars
($1,000,000) per mile or one hundred ninety ($190) dollars per foot. This would allow the City to
currently plan a project for undergrounding approximately 3,400 feet ($647,355/$ 190 per ft.).
riTV OF CARLSBAD UNDERGROUND UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
In 1977 prior to the activation of the 20A funding program, the City fomaed an Underground
Utility Advisory Committee (1977 UUAC) to evaluate and recommend a sequenced program of
undergrounding using City funds as they became available. Early programs focused on the
downtown area to enhance the commercial locations.
The 1977 UUAC was recalled following the passage of the 20A funding program and
established a priority list of projects from the criteria recommended by the CPUC funding
program The 1977 UUAC was made up of the following, the Planning Director,
the City Engineer, the Housing and Redevelopment Director, the Utilities and Maintenance
Director and Representatives from SDG&E, Pacific Bell and Daniels Cablevlsion, and one
citizen appointed by the Mayor and City Council.
The 1977 UUAC developed and Council adopted an addition to the City of Carlsbad's Municipal
Code entitled "Underground Utility Districts" as described in Chapter 11.08 of the code,
which remains in effect today and is attached as Appendix B.
A series of meetings and field trips made by 1977 UUAC members produced a priority list of
streets for future underground districts based on the criteria as referenced in the 20A
documentation.
Project areas from the 1977 UUAC priority list completed'in the 1980's and 1990's include
portions of:
• Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road
• State Street and Laguna Drive
• Monroe Street, Valley Street and Chestnut Street
Project areas from the 1977 UUAC priority list that have not been completed include:
• Harding Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street
• Roosevelt Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street
The last recorded meeting of the 1977 UUAC was in February of 1994 at which time Garfield
Street was recommended as the next project due to the Hubbs-Sea World Development.
Although the area was not on the priority list, the project created the need for additional electric
service capacity in the area. The SDG&E representative verified the need for additional capacity
could be accomplished by upgrading the electrical system when undergrounding the area.
The 1977 UUAC members elected to move the project forward.
The last underground project to be completed from the 1977 UUAC recommended list was the
Monroe StreetA/alley Street, Chestnut Avenue area in 1997. Upon completion ofthe project,
all 20A funds had been depleted.
On January 29, 2001 the Underground Utility Advisory Committee (2001 UUAC) was
reconvened since the existing 20A fund balance is now sufficient to start planning for new
projects. The remaining projects on the 1977 UUAC priority list were selected using the original
criteria, however new evaluations are now in order.
To facilitate this evaluation, the following steps were initiated:
.. • Gordon Baker, Council's citizen appointee to the 1.977 UUAC, agreed to attend the 2001
_^,^.^U.UAC:.rneetings.-^:^- ::";r ^- _
• Lance Schulte is an additional Member-at-Large, who had been appointed to the 1977
' UUAC but, due to the inactivity of the Committee during previous years, had not been
called to serve.
• The following City staff members agreed to be representatives of the 2001 UUAC:
Planning Department
Michael Holzmiller
Public Works Engineering
Bob Johnson
Public Works Engineering
Virginia McCoy
Housing and Redevelopment
Debbie Fountain
f
The 2001 UUAC had five meetings, which are summarized in Appendix C. The following steps
have been taken:
• Identified and prioritized future undergrounding areas/projects as shown in Appendix D.
• Prepared a boundary map for the first priority projects as shown in Appendix E.
• Utilized the City map of overhead utility locations, as shown in Appendix F, to coordinate
with all of the utility companies.
• Held field trips with the utility companies and City staff representatives for area reviews.
• Discussed additional needs and concerns of priority areas to be included in the program.
Although portions of two streets from a previous priority list established in the nineteen eighties
had not undergone the 20A utility conversion, the 2001 UUAC was in favor of a new priority list
being created with all streets with overhead utilities to be included in a priority rated point
system inventory that would lead to a four-year priority list.
An inventory list of all streets in the City with overhead utility lines was completed with a
combination of existing records and field trips for conformation. The completed list showed a
total of 37.04 miles of overhead utility lines in the public street right-of-way.
PRIORITY POINT SYSTEM
The formatting of a priority list point system for the completed inventory became the most
discussed and time consuming project for the 2001 UUAC to undertake.
The first consideration was the criteria the CPUC had instituted for use of 20A funding, which
included the following criteria:
v„ e-.T-< i, - i
Elimination of an unusually heavy concentration of overhead utilities.
• -The street'^carries a heavy volume of pedestrian and/or Vehicular (Average'Daily Trips
(ADT)." • - ' . ~-
• The street passes through a civic area, public recreation area, or area of scenic interest.
The use of the ADT factor necessitated breaking down the streets into block-by-block segments
to adhere to the City ADT record system.
The 2001 UUAC agreed on an assignment of two to five points per street segment for each of
the CPUC conditions.
The second consideration for the use of priority points was adopted from past considerations
that previous 1977 UUAC had employed in selecting 20A funded projects. They were:
• The street is projected to be within that of a future Capital Improvement Project (CIP).
• The street lies within a business district.
• The street is favored by the 2001 UUAC.
These three additional items were assigned two to five points each.
There were two additional factors that the Committee adopted to impact the priority street
selection. One was the decision to exclude, for the present, segments of dead end or cul-de-sac
streets. The second exclusion involved streets that had recently been established as "Alternate
Design Streets" (ADS) in a report adopted by the City Council. The report was the result of the
findings and recommendations produced by a City Council-approved Alternate Street Design
Committee. The reasons for exclusion of the ADS at the current time included lack of ultimate
right-of-ways and lack of right-of-way improvements which would present problenns in
undergrounding dry utility lines.
The completed priority list required extended field trips by City staff prior to completion in a
computer-generated format. A copy of the list with the priority point system completed and
formulated was mailed to 2001 UUAC members to enable them to review and contribute their
changes, additions and revisions. A copy of the Priority List is attached as Exhibit D.
The 2001 UUAC felt the point system worked well in selecting the next streets to be considered
for the underground program with the exception of three street segments, which had high point
ratings, namely Carlsbad Boulevard between the northerly City boundary and two portions of
El Camino Real. The El Camino Real segments were eliminated from the first priority projects
due to the high cost of undergrounding and the uncertainty of future CIP project limits.
Carlsbad Boulevard was also eliminated as a priority street, for the present, due to
environmental concerns.
Since two of the remaining top priority streets were located within the same area of the City,
a Priority Area Boundary Map, attached as Exhibit E, was adopted for a four-year Underground
Planning Program.
The City's SDG&E Government Liaison representative recommended a field trip ofthe selected
priority area to evaluate feasibility and cost. A field trip to the area verified two condusions:
• The-Priority-Area-Boundary-Map-was adopted by the Committee as a four-year projected
project area with Harding Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Palm and Roosevelt
Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street to enter the SDG&E design stage
at the same time. Due~to-the hgRf-of-way_^ number of single-family
service conversions on Roosevelt Street, the SDG&E representative indicated that the
street would take twice the time to design as Harding Street.
• Carlsbad Boulevard would be eliminated as a priority street, for the present, due to the
obvious environmental concerns.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2001 UUAC determined that the first priority projects should be as follows:
• Harding Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Palm Avenue.
• Roosevelt Street from Carlsbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street.
Segments of both Harding Street and Roosevelt Street did not receive the highest priority points
in Appendix D. However, the 2001 UUAC decided that it was important to complete the links in
a high priority area.
The boundary for this first priority undergrounding district is shown in Appendix E. It includes
undergrounding the overhead facilities on several side streets along Harding Street and
Roosevelt Street, since these facilities are an integral part of the existing overhead facilities on
both Harding Street and Roosevelt Street. Building permits issued by the City within this
boundary, prior to the proposed undergrounding, will be required to provide for future
underground service to the structure.
The current timeframe given by SDG&E for preliminary design, final design, coordination with
other overhead utilities and preparation of final contracting documents is two years.
Construction will require an additional year for a total completion time of three years for
Harding Street plus an additional year for Roosevelt Street, for a total completion time of four
years, due to the many easements involved on private properties fronting on Roosevelt Street.
Since the 20A funds cover only the utilities underground construction, the City needs to budget
for other standard improvements such as an upgraded street lighting system and staff overhead
during the two year design period. These other standard improvements will be proposed for
inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Program Budget.
t
f
APPENDIX "A"
Rule 20 of the San Diego
Gas & Electric Company
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Revised Cal.P.U.C. Sheet No. 67 79-E
Cancelling Cal.P.U.C. Sheet No. 48 06-E
f
Sheet 1
RULE 20
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEfiD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
The utility will, at its expense, replace its existing overhead
electric facilities with underground electric facilities along public
streets and roads, and on public larvds and private property across
which rights-of-way satisfactory to the utility have been obtained by
the utility, provided that:
1. The goveming body of the city or county in which such electric
facilities are and will be located has:
a. Detemiined, after consultation with the utility and after-
holding public hearings on the subject, that such
urvdergrouTKling is in the general public interest for one or
more cf the following reasons:
(1) Such urxiergrounding will avoid or eliminate an
unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric
facilities;
12) The street or road or right-of-way is extensively used
by the general public and carries a heavy volume of
pedestrian or vehicular traffic; and
13) The street or road or right-of-way adjoins or passes
through a civic area or public recreation area or an
area of unusual scenic interest to the general public.
b. Adopted an ordinance creating an underground district in
the area in which both the existing and new facilities aire
and will be located, requiring among other things, (1) tliat
all existing overhead communication and electric
distribution facilities in such district shall be removecd,
|2) that each property served from such electric overheacd
facilities shall have installed, in accordance with the
utility's rules for underground service, all electrical
facility changes on the premises necessary to receive
service from the urvderground facilities of the utility as
soon as it is available, and (3) authorizing the utility to
discontinue its overhead service.
(Continued)
Advice Ltr. No. 794-E
Decision No. 90-0 S-Q32
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Revised r.al.P.IJ.C. Sheet No. ^
Cancelling Revised Cal.P.U.C. Sheet No. A807-E
Sheet 2
ROLE 20 (Continued)
PFPLACEMENT OF OVERHFAD V?ITH UNDERGOUND EI.FCTRTC FACILITIES
A. (Continued)
2. The utility's total annual budgeted amount for undergrounding
vjithin any city or the unincorporated area of any county, shall
be allocated as follows:
a. The amount allocated to each city and county in 1990 shall
be the highest of:
(T]
(N:
ID
(2)
|3)
The amount allocated to the city or county in 1989,
which amount shall be allocated in the same ratio t^nat
the number of overhead meters in such city or
incorporated area of any county bears to the total
system overhead meters; or
The amount the city or county would receive if the
utility's total annual budgeted amount for
undergrounding provided in 1989 were allocated in t^be
same ratio that the number of overhead meters in each
city or the unincorporated area of each county bearrs
to the total system overhead meters based on the
latest count of overhead meters available prior to
establishing the 1990 allocations; or
The amount the city or county would receive if the
utility's total annual budgeted amount for
undergrounding provided in 1989 were allocated as
follows:
(a)
lb)
Fifty percent of the budgeted amount allocateci in
the same ratio that the number of overhead meters
in any city or the unincorporated area of any
county bears to the total system overhead meters;
and
Fifty percent of the budgeted amount allocated in
the same ratio that the total number of meters in
any city of the unincorporated area of any coxonty
bears to the total system meters. (N
(Continued)
Advice Ltr. No. -794-E
Decision No. . 90-05-032
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Cal.P.U.C. sheet No.
Cancelling Revised Cal P.II.C. Sheet No. 4808-E
f
Sheet 3
A. 2.
RULE 20 (Continued)
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
(Continued)
b. Except as provided in Section 2.c., the amount allocateci
for undergrounding within any city or the unincorporated
area of any county in 1991 and later years shall use the
amount actually allocated to the city or county in 1990 as
the base, and any changes from the 1990 level in the
utility's total annual budgeted amount for undergroundiag
shall be allocated to individual cities and counties as
follows:
(1) Fifty percent of the change from the 1990 total
budgeted amount shall be allocated in the same ratio
that the nuinber of overhead meters in any city or
unincorporated area of any county bears to the total
system overhead meters.
(2) Fifty percent of the change from the 1990 total
budgeted amount shall be allocated in the same ratio
that the total number of meters in any city or the
unincorporated area of any county bears to the total
system meters.
When a-city incorporatesr-resultlng,in aT transfer of
utility-meters -from the unincorporated-area of a county to
the city, there- shall be a permanent -transfer of a prorata
portion of the county's 1990 allocation base referred to in
Section 2.b. to the city. The amount transferred shall tie
determined:
(1) Fifty percent based on the ratio that the number of
overhead meters in the city bears to the total system
overhead meters; and
(2) Fifty percent based on the ratio that the total number
of meters in the city bears to the total system meters.
When territory is annexed to an existing city, it
shall be the responsibility of the city and county
affected, in consultation with- the utility serving the
territory, to agree upon an amount of the 1990
allocation base that will be transferred from the
county to the city; and thereafter to jointly notify
the Utility in writing.
(Continued)
Advice Ltr. No. _19AzI
Decision No. _90z05zO32
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Revised Cal.PU.C. Sheet No. 6782-E
Cancelling Revised Cal PUC. Sheet No. A809-E
Sheet 4
RULE 20 (Continued)
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
A. 2. (Continued)
r
3.
d.
e.
to
However, Section 2 a, b and c shall not apply to any utility
where the total amount available for allocation under Rule
20-A is equal to or greater than 1.5 times the previous
year's statewide average on a per customer basis. In such
cases, the utility's total annual budgeted amount for
undergrounding within any city or the unincorporated area of
any county shall be allocated in the same ratio that the
number of overhead meters in the city or unincorporated area
of any county bears to the total system overhead meters.
The amounts allocated in accordance with Section 2 a, b, c
or d may be exceeded where the utility establishes that
additional participation on a project is warranted. Such
allocated amounts may be carried over for a reasonable
period of time in communities with active undergrounding
programs. In order to qualify as a community with an
active undergrounding program the goveming body must have
adopted an ordinance or ordinances creating an uiKlergrouncl
district and/or districts as set forth in Section A.l.b. of
this Rule. Where there is a carry-over, the Utility has
the right-to set,.as determined by its capability,
reasonable limits on the rate of performance of the work
be financed by the fundS'Carr4.ed.over. When amounts are
not expended~ot^Garried~over^f or-the.^Gommunity to which
they are initially allocated, they shall be assigned when
additional participation on a project is warranted or be
reallocated to communities with active undergrourKling
programs.
The uiKlergrounding extends for a minimum distance of one bloclc
or 600 feet, whichever is the lesser.
Upon request of the goveming body, the utility will pay for the
installation of no more than 100 feet of each customer's
underground electric service lateral occasioned by the the
undergrounding. The goveming body may establish a smaller
footage allowance, or may limit the amount of money to be
expended on a single customer's electric service, or the total
amount to be expended on all electric service installations in a
particular project.
(Continued)
Advice Ltr. No. 79A-E
Decision No. 90-05-032
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
0
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Revised r.al PIJ.C. Sheet No. ^7^^"^
Cancelling Revised Cal PILC. Sheet No. ^0^"^
f
Sheet 5
RULE 20 (Continued)
PFPTACFMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
In circumstances other than those covered by A. above, the utility
will replace its existing overhead electric facilities with
underground electric facilities along public streets and roads or
other locations mutually agreed upon when requested by an applicant
or applicants when all of the following conditions are met:
(N)
(L)
1. a. All^property owners served from the overhead facilities to
be removed, first agree in writing to have the wiring
changes made on their premises so that service may be
fumished from the underground distribution system in
accordance with the utility's rules, and that the utility
may discontinue its overhead service upon completion of the
underground facilities, or
b. Suitable legislation is in effect requiring such necessary
wiring changes to be made and authorizing the utility to
discontinue its overhead service.
The applicant has:
a. Fumished and installed the^pads and vaults for
transformers and associated equipment, conduits, ducts,
- boxes, pole'bases,-and performediother~^worlctrelated to
"Structures and substructures including breaking of
pavement, trenching, - backf illing r and repaving required in
'cormection with "the installation of the underground system,
all in accordance with the utility's specifications, or, in
lieu thereof, paid the utility to do so;
b. Transferred ownership of such facilities, in good
condition, to the utility; and
c. Paid a nonrefundable sum equal to the excess, if any, of
the estimated costs, exclusive of transformers, meters and
services, of completing the uiKlerground system and building
a new equivalent overhead system.
The area to be undergrounded includes both sides of a street
at least one block or 600 feet, whichever is the lesser, and
existing overhead communieation and electric distribution
facilities within the area will be removed.
(Continued)
for
all
(L)
Advice Ltr No. 794-E
Decision No. 90-05-032
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
San Diego, California
Revised r.al PIl.C. Sheet No. _6784-E_
Cancelling Revised Cal PUC. Sheet No. J^809-E_
Sheet 6
RULE 20 (Continued)
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
In circumstances other than those covered by A. or B. above, when
mutually agreed upon by the utility and an applicant, overhead
electric facilities may be replaced with underground electric
facilities, provided the applicant requesting the'changeapayswin
advance, a nonrefundable sum equal to the estimated cost of the
underground facilities less the estimated net salvage value and
depreciation of the replaced overhead facilities. Underground
services will be installed and maintained as provided in the
utility's rules applicable thereto.
The term "urKderground electric system" means an electric system with
all wires installed underground, except those wires in surface
mounted equipment enclosures.
(N)
(L)
(L)
9
Advice Ltr No. 794-E
Decision No. 90-05-032
Issued by
DONALD E. FELSINGER
Vice President — Marketing
Date Filed
Effective _
Resolution No.
0
0
APPENDIX "B"
Chapter 11.08 ofthe
Carlsbad Municipal Code
11.08.010
Chapter 11.08
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICTS
Sections:
11.08.010
11.08.020
11.08.030
11.08.040
11.08.050
11108:060
li:68;07d
11.08.080
11.08.090
11.08.100
11;08.H0
Definitions.
Public hearing by council.
Designation of underground
utility districts by resolution.
Unlawful acts.
Exception—Emergency or
unusual circumstances.
Other exceptions.
Notice' to 'property owners arid
utility conipiariies.
Responsibility of utility
companies.
Responsibility of property
owners.
Responsibility of city.
Extension of time.
9
11.08.010 Definitions.
Whenever in this chapter the words or phrases
hereinafter in this section defined are used, they
shall have the respective meanings assigned to
them in the foiiowing definitions:
(1) "Commission" means the Public Utilities
Commission of the state of Califomia;
(2) "Poles, overhead wires and associated
overhead structures" mean poles, towers, sup-
ports, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms,
crossarms, braces, transfonners, insulators, cut-
outs, switches, communication circuits,
appliances, attachments and appurtenances
located aboveground within a district and used
or useful in supplying electric, communication
or similar or associated service;
(3) "Underground utility district" or "dis-
trict" means that area in the city within which
poles, overhead wires, and associated overhead
structures are prohibited as such area is described
in a resolution adopted pursuant to the provi-
sions of Section 11.08.030;
(4) "Utility" includes all persons or entities
supplying electric, communication or similar or
associated service by means of electrical mate-
rials or devices. (Ord. 7037 § 1, 1968)
11.08.020 Public hearing by council.
The council may from time to time call pubUc
hearings to ascertain whether the pubhc health,
safety or welfare requires the removal of poles,
overhead wires and associated overhead struc-
tures within designated areas of the city and the
underground instzdlatioh of wires and facilities
for supiplyirig electric, cornmunicatidri, or sim-
ilar or assodated* service. THe city clerk shM
notify all affected property ownei^ as shown on
the last equalized assessment roll and utilities
concemed by mail of the time and place of such
hearings at least fifteen days prior to the date
thereof Each such hearing shall be open to the
public and may be continued from time to time.
At each such hearing all persons interested shall
be given an opportunity to be heard. The deci-
sion of the council shall be final and conclusive.
(Ord. 1296 § 20, 1987; Ord. 7037 § 2, 1968)
11.08.030 Designation of underground utility
districts by resolution.
If after the public hearing the city council
determines that the city or a pubhc utility has
agreed to pay over fifty percent of all costs of
conversion, excluding costs of users' connections
to underground electric or communication facil-
ities and that the public health, safety and welfare
requires such removal and underground installa-
tion, the city council may by resolution declare
the area an underground utility district and order
the work. Such resolution shall include a descrip-
tion of the area comprising such district and shall
provide that the council shall fix by subsequent
resolution, the time within which such removal
and underground installation shall be accom-
plished, having due regard for the availability of
labor, materials and equipment necessary for
such removal and for the installation of such
327
11.08.030
underground facilities as may be occasioned
thereby. (Ord. 1296 § 21, 1987; Ord. 7042 § 1
(part), 1973: Ord. 7037 § 3,1968)
11.08.040 Unlawful acts.
Whenever the council creates an underground
UtiUty district and orders the removal of poles,
overhead wires and associated overhead struc-
tures therein as provided in Section 11.08.030, it
is unlawful for any person or utility to erect,
construct, place, keep, maintain, continue,
employ or operate poles, overhead vvires and
assopiated pyerhead ^structures in the district
after the date when the overhead facilities are .
required to be removed by such resolution,
except as the overhead facilities may be required
to furnish service to an owner or occupant of
property prior to the performance by such owner
or occupant of the underground work necessary
for such owrier or occupant to continue to
receive utility service as provided ih Section
11.08.090, and for such reasonable time required
to remove said faciUties after said work has been
performed, and except as otherwise provided in
this chapter. (Ord. 7037 § 4, 1968)
11.08.050 Exception—Emergency or unusual
circumstances.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this chap-
ter, overhead facilities may be installed and
maintained for a period^ npt to exceed thirty
days, without authority of the council in order to
provide emergency seryice. The council may
§rant special permission, on such terms as the
council may deem appropriate, in cases of
unusual circumstances, without discrimination
as to any person or utility, to erect, construct,
install, maintain, use or operate poles, overhead
wires and associated overhead structures. (Ord.
7037 § 5, 1968)
11.08.060 Other exceptions.
Any resolution adopted pursuant to Section
11.08.030, shall not apply to any ofthe following
types of facilities, unless otherwise provided for
in such resolution:
(1) Any municipal facilities or equipment
installed under the supervision and to the satis-
faction of the city engineer;
(2) Poles, or electroUers used exclusively for
street lighting;
(3) Poles, overhead wires and associated over-
head structures used for the transmission of elec-
tric energy at nominal voltages in excess of thirty-
four thousand five hundred volts;
(4) Antennae, associated equipment and sup-
porting structures, used by a utUity for fumishing
communication services; ,
(5) Equipment apj^urtenM to underground
fadlities, such as^surface mounted transformers,
pedestal mounted terminal boxes and meter cab-
inets, and concealed ducts;
(6) Temporary poles, overhead wires and
associated overhead stmctures used or to be used
in conjunction with constmction projects;
(7) Overhead wires (exclusive of supporting
stmctures) crossing any portion of a district
within which overhead wires have been prohib-
ited, or connecting to buildings on the perimeter
of a district, when such wires originate in an area
from which poles, overhead wires and associated
overhead stmctures are not prohibited;
(8) Overhead wires attached to the exterior
surface of a building by means of a bracket or
other fixture and extending from one location on
the building to another location on the same
building or to an adjacent building without cross-
ing any public street.
(9) New or existing anchor poles and guy
wires within the district necessary to support
overhead facilities outside the district. (Ord.
7042 § 1 (part), 1973: Ord. 7037 § 6, 1968)
11.08.070 Notice to property owners and
utility companies.
Within ten days after the effective date of a
resolution adopted pursuant to Section
11.08.030, the city clerk shall notify all affected
utiUties and all persons owning real property
within the district created by the resolution of the
adoption thereof The city clerk shall further
328
11.08.070
-JL3
notify such affected property owners ofthe necessity
that, if they or any person occupying such property
desire to continue to receive electric, communica-
tion, or similar or associated service, they or such
occupant shall provide all necessary facility changes
on their premises so as to receive such service from
the lines of the supplying utility or utilities at a new
location, subject to applicable rules, regulations and
tariffs of the respective utility or utilities on file
with the commission.
Notification by the city clerk shall be made by
mailing a copy pf the resolution adopted pursuant
to Section .11.08.030, together with a copy of the
ordinance cpdifiediiii this chaptefito affected proper-
ty owners £is such are shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and to the affected utilities. (Ord.
7037 § 7, 1968)
11.08.080 Responsibility of utility
companies.
If underground constmction is necessary to pro-
vide UtiUty service within a district created by any
resolution adopted pursuant to Section 11.08.030,
the supplying utility shall fumish that portion of the
conduits, conductors and associated equipment re-
quired to be fumished by it under its applicable
mles, regulations and tariffs on file with the com-
mission. (Ord. 7037 § 8, 1968)
11.08.090 Responsibility of property owners.
(a) Every person owning, operating, leasing,
occupying or renting a building or stmcture within
a district shall construct and provide that portion of
the service connection on his property between the
faciUties referred to in Section 11.08.080 and the
termination facility on or within said building or
stmcture being served, all in accordance with appli-
cable mles, regulations and tariffs of the respective
utility or utilities on file with the commission.
(b) In the event any person owning, operating,
leasing, occupying or renting s£dd property does not
comply with the provisions of subparagraph (a) of
this section within the time provided for in the
resolution enacted pursuant to Section 11.08.030, the
city engineer shall post written notice on the proper-
ty being served and thirty days thereafter shall have
the authority to order the disconnection and removal
of any and all overhead service wires and associated
facilities supplying utility service to said property.
(c) In addition to the provisions of subparagraph
(b) above, upon direction by the city council, the
engineer shall give notice in writing to the person
in possession of such premises, and a notice in
writing to the owner thereof as shown on the last
equalized jissessment roll, to provide the required
underground faciUties within ten days after receipt
of such notice.
- (d) TSie notice to provide :ithe i required under-
ground ifacilities. may be given .either by personal
service or by; maiiiilnicase of-service by mail on
either of such persons, the notice must be deposited
in the United States mail in a sealed envelope with
postage prepaid, addressed to the person in posses-
sion of such premises at such premises, and the
notice must be addressed to the owner thereof as
such owner's name appears,'and must be addressed
to such owner's last known address as the same
appears on the last equaUzed assessment roU, and
when no address appears, to "General Delivery, City
of Carlsbad." If notice is given by mail, such notice
shall be deemed to have been received by the person
to whom it has been sent within forty-eight, hours
after the mailing thereof. If notice is given by mail
to either the owner or occupant of such premises,
the city engineer shall, within forty-eight hours after
the mailing thereof, cause a copy thereof, printed on
a card not less than eight inches by ten inches in
size, to be posted in a conspicuous place on the
premises.
(e) The notice given by the city eiigineer to pro-
vide the required imderground faciUties shall partic-
ularly specify what work is required to be done, and
shall state that if the work is not completed within
thirty days after receipt of such notice, the city
engineer will provide such required underground
facilities, in which case the cost and expense thereof
wiU become a lien upon the property benefited.
(f) Upon completion of the work by the city
engineer, he shall file a written report with the city
council setting forth the fact that the required under-
329 (Carlsbad 5-97)
11.08.090
ground facilities have been provided and the cost
thereof, together with a legal description of the
property against which such cost is to become a
lien. The council shall thereupon fix a time and
place for hearing protests against the cost of such
work upon such premises, which said time shall not
be less than ten days thereafter.
(g) The city engineer shall forthwith, upon the
time for hearing such protests having been fixed,
give a notice in writing to the person in possession
of such premises, and a notice in writing thereof to
the owner thereof, in the manner hereinabove pro-
videdtfpr- the giving of the notice to pr6videi,,the
required tiridergroimdfifaciUtiesi'of thevitime*
place|that|the couiieil willspaiss%pdni^such report and
will heai- protests. Such notice"shaU' also set forth
the amount of the proposed lien.
(h) Upon the date and hour set for the hearing of
protests, the council shall hear and consider the
report and all protests, if there be any, and then
proceed to affirm, inodifyior reject the Uen.
(i) If these costsiare-not paid within five days
after their confirmationfby the city council^ they
shall become; a lien upon the real property as de-
scribed by the city engineer, and the city engineer
is directed to turn over to the assessor and tax col-
lector a notice of Uen on each of the properties on
which these costs have not been, paid, and the asses-
sor and tax coUector shaU add the amount of these
costs to the next regular biU for taxes levied against
the premises for which'the work bias been performed
and has not been pziid. These costs shaU be due and
payable at the same time:as the property taxes are
due and payable, and if not paid when due and
payable, shall bear interest at the rate of six percent
per year. (Ord. NS-391 §§ 1—5, 1997; Ord. 7037
§ 9, 1968)
pursuant to Section 11.08.030. (Ord. 7037 § 10,
1968)
11.08.110 Extension of time.
In the event that any act required by this chapter
or by a resolution adopted pursuant to Section
11.08.030 cannot be performed within the time
provided on account of shortage of materials, war,
restraint by public authorities, strikes, labor distur-
bances, civil disobedience, or any other circumstanc-
es beyond the control of the actor, then the time
within which such act will be accomplished shall be
extendedifor a period equivalent to the time of such
lunitation. (Ord. 7037 § 11, 1968) <
o
11.08.100 ResponsibUity of city.
The city shaU remove at its own expense all
city-owned equipment from aU poles required to be
removed under this chapter in ample time to enable
the owner or user of such poles to remove the same
within the time specified in the resolution enacted
(Carlsbad 5-97) 330
0
0
APPENDIX "C"
2001 UUAC Meeting Summaries
0
#
f
APPENDIX C
MEETING SUMMARIES OF THE 2001
UNDERGROUND UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FIRST IVIEETING
The Underground Utility Advisory Committee was re-convened on January 29, 2001, which was
the first scheduled meeting of the Committee since February of 1994. The following members
and attendees were present:
Citizen at Large, Gordon Baker
Planning Director, Michael Holzmiller
Housing & Redevelopment Director, Debbie Fountain
Deputy City Engineer, Transportation, Bob Johnson
Engineering Consultant, Galen Peterson
Engineering Technician, Liviu Rosu
Administrative Coordinator, Virginia McCoy - Chair
SDG&E Government Liaison, Dennis Buss
Pacific Bell Liaison, Benny Pepe
Adelphia (Daniels) Cablevlsion Liaison, Lany Guthrie
A background report covering the 20A funding program was sent to the attendees prior to this
meeting (attached to this report as Exhibit A) to bring them up-to-date on past program
activities, current funding availability and to suggest a future goal/work program for the
Committee.
This first meeting set the scope of work for future meetings. The original intent of the Committee
Jacilitator was to complete the former 20A priority list from 1988, which Included portions of
IRbosevelt Street and Harding Street. Slides of the two streets were shown focusing on jhe
^overhead utilityiihes. ~~ ~- >.• ^-^-r ^ . ^ :
Group discussion followed the slide-presentation and focused on the.time lapse since the former
priority list was prepared. This was followed by the Committee's unanimous decision that a
complete inventory of all streets in the City with overhead utilities was needed prior to any
selection that could be made for the next street to benefit from the SDG&E financed 20A
Underground Program.
The Committee requested that a new City map be prepared showing all streets with overhead
utilities accompanied by a point-focused priority chart for the overhead serviced streets.
Point criteria for the chart would include ADT's, and related CIP data. It was agreed that streets
included on the recently completed "Alternate Design Standards" list would be included on the
map and priority list for inventory purposes but due to right-of-way needs for undergrounding,
may not qualify for the 20A funded program.
Bob Johnson discussed an item from the City Traffic Safety Commission. The Commission had
heard a request from a Carlsbad citizen to evaluate the status of the undergrounding of the
overhead utilities in front of Jefferson School on Jefferson Street between Tamarack Avenue
and Magnolia Street. The decision of the Committee was to include the area on the priority list
and allow the point system to determine the priority order.
SECOND MEETING
f
The second meeting was held on February 26, 2001. In attendance were:
Michael Holzmiller
Debbie Fountain
Bob Johnson
Gordon Baker
Lance Schulte
Galen Peterson
Liviu Rosu
Virginia IVIcCoy
Lance Schulte Is an additional Member-at-Large, who had been appointed to the Committee in
1997 but, due to the inactivity of the Committee during previous years, had not been called to
serve.
A draft of the priority chart was produced listing all overhead utility sen/iced streets with ADT's
and street segment lengths. City maps had been prepared delineating all overhead serviced
streets, previously 20A funded underground project areas and all 'Alternate Design Standard"
designated streets.
The focus of the meeting centered on additional information that should be added to the priority
chart for each street segment to assure a better priority-rated selection. The Committee's
decision was to include the following items to the chart, with each item to include a certain
number of point's to determine the priority for each street segment.
Concentration of overhead
Traffic volumes
Civic, recreation, and/or scenic corridor adjacent to overhead lines
Business District, CIP and Committee judgment point assignments
Street lengths
In addition, segments of streets terminating with a cul-de-sac would be considered low priority
and placed in the same category as ADS streets.
THIRD MEETING
he third meeting of the Underground Utility Advisory Committee was held on July 23, 2001.
he following were in attendance:
Michael Holzmiller
Lori Rosenstein (for Debbie Fountain)
Bob Johnson
Gordon Baker
Lance Schulte
Galen Peterson
Liviu Rosu
Dennis Buss, SDG&E Government Liaison
Virginia McCoy
#
•
ff
Dennis Buss gave the 20A funding update and corresponding timeframe. In summary, the
update informed the Committee that the City had accumulated about $245,000 and with the
current 20A disbursement policy would continue to acquire approximately $200,000. per year.
With the timeframe of two years estimated as the time span between preliminary planning and
start of construction, the City should target a priority area and establish at least a five-year
planning-through-construction project program. Estimated cost for future projects should be
estimated at $200 per front foot of utility undergrounding. The cost of the electric
undergrounding will be covered by 20A funds. Pacific Bell and cablevlsion lines that share the
SDG&E poles will be placed underground by the agencies at no cost to the City. City General
Funds will pay any public street appendages that need to be added, such as street lights and
sign replacements.
The completed priority charts were distributed and related maps were displayed for review
bythe Committee. The Committee reviewed and approved both the completeness of the
priority-point system and the result oriented ability to target a future priority area.
The Committee approved the priority chart listing, attached as Exhibit B. The listing produced a
general area with the highest points for further investigation. This general area is located
between Carlsbad Village Drive on the north. Palm Avenue on the south, Roosevelt Street on
the west and Interstate 5 on the east.
With funding availability and agreement on the general priority area, the Committee's next step
in the selection process was a field trip to the priority area to investigate realistic implementation
possibilities.
FOURTH MEETING - A FIELD TRIP
The Committee met at the Harding Center on August 6, 2001. The following parties were
present:
Dennis Buss
~-^Gordon Baker^ ' = ' -
" Lance Schultz
Bob Johnson _ ^
' Galen Peterson "• '^^"^s-- r.. - ^ —. . - -r—
Lori Rosenstein
Liviu Rosu
Virginia McCoy
Dennis Buss distributed SDG&E maps of the general priority area that the Committee had
chosen. The maps showed all overhead and underground electrical service lines, vaults,
transformers and property sen/ices. City staff furnished individual parcel type maps for individual
property identification and field notes.
The group walked the Harding Street frontage and discussed underground construction
requirements, feasibility of undergrounding certain structures and cost of undergrounding.
A van was provided for the remainder of the field tnp in order to view the entire priority area.
The van tnp continued to Cartsbad Boulevard from the northerly City boundary to its merge with
State Street. This area had the highest number of priority points, but due to potential ground
water problems and unknown environmental impacts, the Committee chose to exclude this area
from the present list of undergrounding projects.
9
#
ff
As a result of the field trip, the Committee tentatively agreed that Harding Street would be the
first project on the priority list with two portions of Roosevelt Street to follow. After the field trip,
Dennis Buss provided preliminary cost estimates for the first three priority areas as follows:
• Harding Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Avocado Lane including portions of
Pine Avenue to the west and Chestnut Avenue to the east and west = $400,000.
• Roosevelt Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Chestnut Avenue including portions of
Pine Avenue to the east = $325,000.
• Roosevelt Street from Chestnut Avenue to Magnolia Avenue = $150,000.
A map of these three areas considered as the first priorities in a five-year plan is attached as
Exhibit C.
It is recommended that the City adopt this five-year plan of undergrounding with 20A funds and
begin final design to implement the plan.
FIFTH MEETING
The Fifth Meeting was held on Monday, September 24, 2001 in Room 257 of the Faraday
Center. The following parties were present.
Michael Holzmiller*
Debbie Fountain*
Lori Rosenstein
Bob Johnson*
Liviu Rosu
Virginia McCoy
Galen Peterson
""Gorddn Baker*—' ' ' ^"~"f 7~Z7Z'
liance Schulte' - " • T-"" : >- . . - . ' ••- r
*Voting Members
The meeting was called to order at 10:05 a.m.
The meeting began with a discussion of the field trip. The area as outlined on a pre-delineated
boundary map was approved unanimously as the proposed boundary for a five-year priority
20A funded underground program. In general, the area is bounded by Carisbad Village Drive to
the north, Tyler to the west. Tamarack to the south and 1-5 to the east. The first two streets to
be selected in order are Harding Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Palm Avenue and
Roosevelt Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Magnolia.
The meeting continued with a discussion on the Underground Priority List and the point system
used for prioritizing the streets. The intent of the priority chart was to give priority points in
varying amounts for certain criteria that would rate the streets in a high point format for the
20A underground program schedule. In following the highest point format, the first two streets
on the list were Carisbad Boulevard from the north city limits to State Street, and El Camino
Real between Chestnut Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue and a portion of Hosp Way and
Carisbad Village Drive.
0
0
f
The two streets presented problems as future 20A undergrounding projects. Due to the
proximity to the Buena Vista Lagoon, Carisbad Boulevard would pose a number of
environmental issues. The cost factor involved in undergrounding El Camino Real, classified as
an arterial street, would limit the length of the area to undergo the utility conversion and only a
small portion of the street would show improvement. In addition, an upcoming CIP project has
been scheduled for the arterial, which could include the undergrounding of the utility lines as an
element ofthe CIP.
A discussion ensued in regard to placing Harding Street alone as number one on the priority list
and placing Roosevelt Street as number two since Roosevelt Street residents have individually
and as a group requested and anticipated improvements to their street, including enhanced
appearance and additional street lighting for a continued period of time.
Dennis Buss, our SDG&E Government Liaison, explained that a number of single-family units
on Roosevelt would require both the design and construction of underground services from
the public right-of-way to their home service and the required home service conversions.
Also, a number of the homes have walls, fences, stairs and landscaping encroaching into the
public right-of-way that would require negotiations, relocations and possible removal to install
the underground sen/ices. In addition to adding to the cost of the project, the time factors for
negotiating with the property owners on the relocations would slow down the project
considerably.
On the other hand, Harding Street has fewer residents thus fewer home service conversions
that would involve adjacent right-of-way relocations. The SDG&E design and construction
elements would move much faster and the visual enhancement would be apparent in
approximately half the time.
Rather than use references of Priority Number I and Priority Number II for the streets,
Buss suggested the use of IA for Harding and IB for Roosevelt with both streets starting the
SDG&E design phase at the same time. While the construction phase is taking place on
Harding, the negotiations for relocations on Roosevelt could be in process.
"The Committee was in favor of the Phase IA, Phase IB approach and felt the Roosevelt Street
residents/property owners would be conciliated knowing their street was in design for the
undergrounding process.
The next agenda item presented to the Committee was a request for comments, corrections and
additions to the draft of this report. All attendees had received the draft in an eariier mailing.
No major additions were brought fonward and the report was accepted as written.
The Committee, with the assistance of Buss, then discussed the next steps to be taken prior to
entry into the SDG&E design phase which would consist of an additional field trip of the Priority
area with other impacted utilities. The Committee was informed the field trip would confirm the
final underground design and where possible could take in additional portions of intersecting
streets where feasible.
At the close of the meeting, the voting Committee members handed in forms with their priority
choices and additional comments regarding the reasons for the selections. One committee
member added Jefferson Street between Magnolia Avenue and Tamarack Avenue as an
additional priority. SDG&E Liaison Buss reported he was working on negotiations with the
Capital Improvement Project (CIP) team regarding power pole relocations for the identified
Jefferson Street portion with design to begin in the near future. Since the street portion lies
within the 20A Priority Area Boundary, no further action was taken and the Priority Boundary
Line will include Jefferson Street pending future CIP construction plans.
ff
With all issues pertaining to the Five-Year 20A Underground Priority List brought forward,
discussed and unanimously agreed upon, the Committee discussed the future procedures
necessary to bring forth the first priority areas for City Council approval.
Following the agreed upon format for action, the Committee was adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLAN OF ACTION
• This report will be fonwarded to the Leadership Team for their approval prior to Council
action.
• The Committee Consultant and Chair have met with SDG&E, Pacific Bell,
and Adelphia Cable representatives and executed a field trip of the Priority Area for
future design and consolidations necessary to underground all overhead utility lines.
• All reports, priority charts, and maps related to the Underground Utility Advisory
Committee's activities and actions will remain on file for public review at the Office of the
City Engineer, 1635 Faraday Avenue.
ff
K
^ AV-^^-
RE-ACTIVATION OF THE 20A FUNDING PROGRAM ^
(SDG&E UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) ^
The City of Carlsbad has maintained a pro-active position on the subject of
undergrounding existing overhead utility lines when funding is available. One such
funding source is the 20A Program as provided by San Diego Gas & Electric Company
THIS REPORT WILL:
1. Review the background and policies of the 20A funding program.
2. Describe the formafion and purpose of the Underground Utility Advisory Committee.
3. Review areas within the City that have been undergrounded in the past using 20A
allotments.
4. Report on the current status of 20A funds and the recent changes made to the policy by
the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC).
5. Identify actions required to select the next areas of the City to be undergrounded with
20A funds.
THE 20A FUNDING PROGRAM BACKGROUND
In 1983, the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) instituted the Rule 20A Funding
Program which provides that certain funds are set aside each year by San Diego Gas and
Electric Company (SDG&E) to pay for the undergrounding of existing utility lines. The amount
of money Carisbad receives each year is based on a formula derived from the number of
overhead service meters in our City in proportion to the number of overhead sen/ice meters
throughout San Diego County.
_Within_theJext_ofJ:Rule-20A, Jhe-CBUC-establishe'd-certain-criteria-for the- City -to follow when
establishing a priority list of areas to benefit from the program. The criterion for underground
projectsfollows:
"Determined, after consultation with the utility company, and after holding public
hearings on the subject, that such undergrounding is in the general public
interest for one or more ofthe following reasons:
• Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead utilities.
• The street or road right-of-way is extensively used by the general public and
carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic and:
• The street or road or right-of-way adjoins or passes through a civic area or
public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general
public."
The 20A funding program covered most of the cost for undergrounding the SDG&E lines within
the public right-of-way including both design and construction. In addition, Pacific Bell and
Daniels Cablevision undergrounded their lines in the area (if applicable) at no cost to the C^ity.
The funding did not, however, cover the cost for the customer service side undergrounding from
the end of the street public right-of-way to the customers service point. That cost was borne by
1 Exhibit "A"
0
the property owner. This presented a financial burden to the property owners, which at times
could deter areas of the City from becoming part of an undergrouncj conversion program.
In 1999, the CPUC revised the 20A funding policy to include the cost of undergrounding from
the right-of-way to the customer service box, if the governing City elected to include the
provision in the contract. Although each project should be evaluated separately prior to
incorporating the new policy, the possibility of eliminating the service installation cost to the
property owners will promote/increase the acceptance of the project by the property owners.
CITY OF CARLSBAD UNDERGROUND UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Prior to the activation of the 20A funding program, the City formed an Underground Utility
Advisory Committee (UUAC) in 1977 to evaluate and recommend a sequenced program of
undergrounding using City funds as they became available. Early programs focused on the
downtown area to enhance the commercial locations.
The UUAC was recalled following the passage of the 20A funding program and established a
priority list of projects from the criteria recommended by the PUC funding program.
The Committee was made up of the foiiowing, the Planning Director, the City Engineer, the
Housing and Redevelopment Director, the Utilities and Maintenance Director and
Representatives from SDG&E, Pacific Bell and Daniels Cablevision, and one citizen appointed
by the Mayor and City Council.
The Committee developed and Council adopted an addition to the City of Carlsbad's Municipal
Code entitled "Underground Utility Districts" as described in Chapter 11.08 of the codebook,
which remains in effect today.
A series of meetings and field trips made by Committee members produced a priority list of
streets for future underground districts based on the criteria as referenced in the 20A
documentation.
Project areas from the priority list completed in the 80's and 90's include portions of:
• Carisbad Boulevard and Cannon Road
• State Street and Laguna Drive
• Monroe Street, Valley Street and Chestnut Street
Project areas from the priority list that have not been completed include:
• Harding Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street
• Roosevelt Street from Carisbad Village Drive to Magnolia Street
The last recorded meeting of the UUAC was in February of 1994 at which time Garfield Street
was recommended as the next project due to the Hubbs-Sea Worid Development. Although the
area was not on the priority list, the project created the need for additional electric service
capacity in the area. The SDG&E Committee representative verified the need for additional
capacity could be accomplished by upgrading the electrical system when undergrounding the
area. The Committee elected to move the project forward.
The last underground project to be completed from the UUAC recommended list was the
Monroe StreetA'alley Street, Chestnut Avenue area in 1997. Upon completion ofthe project, all
20A funds had been depleted and the City was $150,000 in arrears in the funding program
accounts.
CURRENT STATUS OF 20A FUNDS
The City receives an average of $200,000 in 20A funds from SDG&E per year to be used for
utility conversions. It is possible for the City to borrow up to two years in advance on future 20A
funds. Currently, the City has approximately $250,000 in funds and $400,000 that can be
advanced.
The current cost for utility underground is estimated at one million dollars ($1,000,000) per mile
or one hundred ninety dollars ($190) per foot.
REACTIVATING THE PROGRAM. FIRST STEPS
The existing 20A fund level is now sufficient to start planning for new projects; however, certain
steps should be taken before the next area to be undergrounded is selected.
Since the remaining projects on the priority list as listed previously were selected on
considerations existing in 1997, new evaluations are in order. In order to accomplish this, the
Utility Underground Advisory Committee should be recalled.
To facilitate this action, the following steps have been initiated.
• Contacted Gordon Baker, Council's citizen appointee to the Committee, and he has
agreed to attend the meetings
• Tentatively scheduled the Committee re-call meeting for January 23, 2001
• Prepared notification letters to be sent to both City department leaders and the three
utility companies that will make up the Committee. Mailings will include a copy of
this report when accepted by City Management.
• The following staff members are recommended as Committee representatives:
Planning Department
Michael Holzmiller -i;... . .-- - _ ..
0
Public Works Engineering
Bill Plummer
Public Works Maintenance and Operations
Pat Guevara
Housing and Re-development
Debbie Fountain
The Committee once reconvened shall initiate the following steps.
• Identify and re-prioritize future undergrounding areas/projects
• Plan for field trips with utility companies and City staff representatives for area reviews.
• Discuss additional needs and concerns of priority areas to be included in presentaticDn to
City Council.
The current timeframe given by SDG&E for preliminary design, final design, coordination with
other overhead utilities and final contracting documents is two years.
#
f
APPENDIX "D"
Priority Chart
uuptablel zl^OI ByPoints.xls %
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 3 : 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET LIMlTSj LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total
Points
COST [$] OTHER
FACTORS
119 HARDING ST PINE AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 860.0 5583 X 3 3 2 8 16 172,000 A
117 HARDING ST CARLSBAD VILLAGE;DR TO OAK AVE 400.0 7049 3 3 2 7 15 80,000 A
92 EL CAMINO REAL S/O CHESTNUT AVE 2010' 2090.0 26869 X 1 5 5 3 14 418,000
91 EL CAMINO REAL HOSP WY TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 1500.0 33226 3 5 5 0 13 300,000
241 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE 395.0 6491 3 3 0 7 13 79,000 A
242 ROOSEVELT ST OAK AVE TO PINE AVE 410.0 4800 3 3 0 7 13 82,000 A
243 ROOSEVELT ST PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE 385.0 4000 3 3 0 7 13 77,000 A
39 CARLSBAD BLVD CITY LIMIT TO STATE ST 1325.0 22389 2 5 5 0 12 265,000
118 HARDING ST OAK AVE TO PINE AVE 390.0 5716 3 3 0 5 11 78,000 A
148 JEFFERSON ST MAGNOLIA AVE TO ANCHOR WY 300.0 6800 X 3 3 2 3 11 60,000
151 JEFFERSON ST ANCHOR WY TO CAROL PL 475.0 7200 x 3 3 2 3 11 95,000
221 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD PALOMAR OAKS TO COLLEGE BLVD. 5100.0 40800 1 5 5 0 11 1,020,000
150 JEFFERSON ST CAROL PL TO TAMARACK AVE 300.0 7488 X 1 3 2 3 9 60,000
210 OAK AVE OCEAN ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD 350.0 1720 2 2 3 2 9 70,000
235 PINE AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 260.0 2500 2 2 3 2 9 52,000
257 TAMARACK AVE HIGHLAND DR TO JAMES DR 320.0 10215 2 5 2 0 9 64,000
258 TAMARACK AVE JAM ES DR TO VALLEY ST 815.0 10413 2 5 2 0 9 163,000
63 CHESTNUT AVE CAMEO RD TO CELINDA DR 635.0 6293 X 2 3 0 3 8 127,000
64 CHESTNUT AVE CELINDA DR TO EL CAMINO REAL 355.0 6293 x 2 3 0 3 8 71,000
140 JEFFERSON ST LAS FLORES TO BUENA VISTA WY 660.0 13873 3 5 0 0 8 132,000
141 JEFFERSON ST BUENA VISTA WY TO BUENA PL 370.0 13873 3 5 0 0 8 74,000
142 JEFFERSON ST BUENA PL TO KNOWLES PL 300.0 13873 3 5 0 0 8 60,000
143 JEFFERSON ST KNOWLES PL TO LAGUNA DR 670.0 13873 3 5 0 0 8 134,000
144 JEFFERSON ST LAGUNA OR TO ARBUCKLE PL 625.0 9800 3 3 0 2 8 125,000
149 JEFFERSON ST TAMARACK AVE TO CITRUS PL 235.0 3891 x 3 2 0 3 8 47,000
160 LAS FLORES DR JEFFERSON ST TO TUTTLE ST 280.0 10175 3 5 0 0 8 56,000
209 OAK AVE HARDING ST TO 1-5 655.0 2900 2 2 2 2 8 131,000
244 1 ROOSEVELT ST WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 400.0 0 3 0 0 5 8 80,000 A
Page 1 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel % 1 ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
2 3 1 4 5 1 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET LIMITS LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total COST [$] OTHER
245 ROOSEVELT ST CHESTNUT AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE 690.0 0 3 0 0 5 8 138,000 A
255 TAMARACK AVE JEFFERSON ST TO 1-5 245.0 15540 3 5 0 0 8 49,000
256 TAMARACK AVE PIO PICO DR RO ADAMS ST 420.0 16091 1 5 2 0 8 84,000
7 ADAMS AVE HIGHLAND DR TO PARK DR 1775.0 826 2 0 5 0 7 355,000
53 CHESTNUT AVE HARDING ST TO PIO PICO DR 365.0 6698 2 3 2 0 7 73,000
145 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE 420.0 2434 3 2 0 2 7 84,000
162 LAS FLORES DR PIO PICO DR TO CHUPAROSA WY 300.0 2967 3 2 2 0 7 60,000
174 MADISON ST CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE 385.0 2032 3 2 2 0 7 77,000
176 MADISON ST PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE 390.0 2400 3 2 2 0 7 78,000
177 MADISON ST WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 400.0 2800 3 2 2 0 7 80,000
178 MADISON ST CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE 450.0 2000 3 2 2 0 7 90,000
2 ACACIA AV W/O GARFIELD ST 730.0 745 3 0 3 0 6 146,000
6 ADAMS AVE HOOVER ST TO HIGHLAND DR 1235.0 1147 1 0 5 0 6 247,000
52 CHESTNUT AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST 370.0 3184 2 2 2 0 6 74,000
192 MAGNOLIA AVE VALLEY ST TO MONROE ST 1020.0 1970 2 2 2 0 6 204,000
204 OAK AVE RAILROAD TO STATE ST 160.0 400 2 0 2 2 6 32,000
259 TAMARACK AVE VALLEY ST TO PARK DR 250.0 10141 1 5 0 0 6 50,000
262 TAMARACK AVE POLLY LN TO HIGHLAND DR 335.0 12733 1 5 0 0 6 67,000
274 VALLEY ST BASSWOOD AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 660.0 2323 2 2 2 0 6 132,000
276 VALLEY ST MAGNOLIA AVE TO ANDREA AVE 745.0 1935 2 2 2 0 6 149,000
1 ACACIA AV CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 395.0 745 2 0 3 0 5 79,000
45 CHERRY AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 425.0 546 2 0 3 0 5 85,000
46 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 405.0 793 2 0 3 0 5 81,000
54 CHESTNUT AVE PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST 560.0 5335 2 3 0 0 5 112,000
58 - CHESTNUT AVE HIGHLAND DR TO VALLEY ST 1130.0 5100 2 3 0 0 5 226,000
60 CHESTNUT AVE DONNA DR TO WESTHAVEN DR 225.0 6293 2 3 0 0 5 45,000
120 HARDING ST CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE 630.0 3282 3 2 0 0 5 126,000
124 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 475.0 423 2 0 3 0 5 95,000
146 JEFFERSON ST OAK AVE TO PINE AVE 400.0 1169 3 0 2 0 5 80,000
(5 ^
Page 2 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1 ByPoints.xls %
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
' ' July 2001
1 2 3 , 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET LIMITS' LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total
5
COST [$] OTHER
161 LAS FLORES DR 1-5 TO PIO PICO DR 290.0 5930 2 3 0 0
Total
5 58,000
191 MAGNOLIA AVE HIGHLAND DR TOlVALLEY ST 1210.0 2026 1 2 2 0 5 242,000
206 OAK AVE ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST 390.0 2611 1 2 0 2 5 78,000
207 OAK AVE MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST 375.0 2349 1 2 0 2 5 75,000
279 WALNUT AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TOIGARFIELD ST 375.0 1165 2 0 3 0 5 75,000
10 ADAMS AVE TAMARACK AV TO CAMINO DEL SOL 285.0 3151 2 2 0 0 4 57,000
11 ADAMS AVE CAMINO DEL S'OLTO^ CHINQUAPIN AV 465.0 3151 2 2 0 0 4 93,000
51 CHESTNUT AVE MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST 380.0 0 2 0 2 0 4 76,000
59 CHESTNUT AVE • MONROE 1ST TO DONNA DR 345.0 6293 1 3 0 0 4 69,000
61 CHESTNUT AVE WESTHAVENi DR TO SEAVIEW WY 220.0 6293 1 3 0 0 4 44,000
62 . CHESTNUT AVE SEAVIEW WY TO CAMEO RD 315.0 6293 1 3 0 0 4 63,000
67 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO IGARFIELD ST 440.0 0 1 0 3 0 4 88,000
77 CHRISTIANSEN WY CARLSBAD BLVD TO RAILROAD 400.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 80,000
78 CHRISTIANSEN WY RAILROAD TO STATE ST 100.0 0 2 0 2 0 4 20,000
108 GARFIELD ST REDWOOD AVE TO TAMARACK AVE 240.0 3829 2 2 0 0 4 48,000
113 GRAND AVE HOPE AVE TO CUL DE SAC 450.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 90,000
129 HOME AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HOPE AVE 480.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 96,000
132 HOPE AVE HOME AVE TO GRAND AVE 400.0 0 2 0 0 2 .4 80,000
152 JUNIPER AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 470.0 778 1 0 3 0 4 94,000
184 MAGNOLIA AVE MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST 500.0 4841 2 2 0 0 4 100,000
188 MAGNOLIA AVE ADAMS ST TO GRECOURT WY 580.0 1882 2 2 0 0 4 116,000
193 MAPLE AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 410.0 347 1 0 3 0 4 82,000
198 MONROE ST • KAREN LN TO PARK DR 725.0 1728 2 2 0 0 4 145,000
203 OAK AVE UNCOLNSTTO RAILROAD 515.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 103,000
205 OAK AVE STATE ST TO ROOSEVELT ST 390.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 78,000
208 OAK AVE JEFFERSON TO HARDING ST 395.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 79,000
211 ^ OAK AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO LINCOLN ST 205.0 0 2 0 0 2 4 41,000
216 PACIFIC AVE OCEAN ST TO MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 625.0 s:?:^:554;K ;-^2f:: Or 2 d • 4: . 125,000 B
223 PARKDR MAY OTTO TAMARACK AVE 650,0 2557 2 2 0 0 4 130,000
Page 3 of 11 A APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1 ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 , 3 ii 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID' STREET , LIMITS LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total
4
COST [$] OTHER
228 PINE AVE' TYLER ST TO ROOSEVELT ST 175.0 0 2 0 0 2
Total
4 35,000
230 PINE AVE MADISON Sir TO JEFFERSON ST 385.0 0 2 0 2 0 4 77,000
231 PINE AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST 375.0 0 2 0 2 0 4 75,000
254 SYCAMORE AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST 380.0 333 1 0 3 0 4 76,000
275 VALLEY ST CHESTNUT AVE TOiMAGNOLIA AVE 890.0 1789 2 2 0 0 4 178,000
277 VALLEY ST ANDREA AVE TO TAMARACK AVE 430.0 2642 2 2 0 0 4 86,000
283 WALNUT AVE E/0 MADISON ST TO THE ALLEY 180.0 0 2 0 2 0 4 36,000
8 ADAMS AVE MAGNOLIA AV TO LARKSPUR WY 670.0 0 1 0 2 0 3 134,000
9 ADAMS AVE LARKSPUR WY TO TAMARACK AV 395.0 0 1 0 2 0 3 79,000
14 ADAMS AVE HARRISON ST TO HOOVER ST 600.0 1083 3 0 0 0 3 120,000
23 BASSWOOD AVE EUREKA ST TO HIGHLAND DR -1400.0, 0 X 0 0 0 3 3 280,000 c
48 CHESTNUT AVE LINCOLN ST TO RAILROAD 520.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 104,000
65 CHESTNUT AVE EL CAMINO REAL TO CATALINA DR 160.0 4073 1 2 0 0 3 32,000
66 ^ CHESTNUT AVE CATALINA DR TO TREISTE OR 160.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 32,000
73 CHINQUAPIN AVE HARRISON ST TO ADAMS ST 535.0 2536 1 2 0 0 3 107,000
74 CHINQUAPIN AVE ADAMS ST TO SYME DR 520.0 3034 1 2 0 0 3 104,000
99 GARFIELD ST PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE 410.0 1733 1 2 0 0 3 82,000
104 GARFIELD ST ACACIA AVE TO CHERRY AVE 315.0 2882 1 2 0 0 3 63,000
109 GARFIELD ST TAMARACK AVE TO SEQUOIA AVE 270.0 1907 1 2 0 0 3 54,000
121 HARDING ST PALM AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE 580.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 116,000
122 HARDING ST MAGNOLIA AVE TO CAROL PL 745.0^ 0 3 0 0 0 3 149,000
147 JEFFERSON ST CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE 400.0 0 1 0 2 0 3 80,000
175 MADISON ST OAK AVE TO PINE AVE .390.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 78,000
179 MADISON ST PALM AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE 475.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 95,000
183 MAGNOLIA AVE ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST 445.0 0 3 0 0 0 3 89,000
185 MAGNOLIA AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST 285.0 2892 1 2 0 0 3 57,000
214 OCEAN ST GARFIELD ST TO BEECH ST ' -1830.0 816 0-0 :3 ;v3'v-::-366i000 B.
215 OCEAN ST CHRISTIANSEN WY TO OAK AVE 1140.0 816 m> 0 0 3 ..;':-^3.:.-^-228,000 B :
W PARKDR MONROE TO MAY CT 400.0 2557 1 2 0 0 3 80,000
Page 4 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablelSirOI ByPoints.xls
I , CityofCarlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 ^3-;; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET 1 LIMITS . LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total COST [$] OTHER
229 PINE AVE ROOSEVELT ST TO: MADISON ST 380.0 0 1 0 0 2 3 76,000
240 ROOSEVELT ST LAGUNA DR.TO BEECH AVE 970.0 0 1 0 0 2 3 194,000
268 VALLEY ST CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO JAMES DR 145.0 2019 1 2 0 0 3 29,000
282 WALNUT AVE ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST 375.0 519 1 0 0 2 3 75,000
4 ADAMS AVE CHESTNUT AV TO PALM AV 270.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 54,000
5 ADAMS AVE ADAMS ST TO MAGNOLIA AV 605.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 121,000
12 ADAMS AVE CHINQUAPIN AV TO HARBORVIEW LN 345.0 1083 2 0 0 0 2 69,000
13 ADAMS AVE HARBORVIEW LN TO LOCUST ST 125.0 1083 2 0 0 0 2 25,000
15 ADAMS AVE LOCUST ST TO HARRISON ST 200.0 1083 2 0 0 0 2 40,000
25 BASSWOOD AVE JAMES DR TO VALLEY ST 470.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 94,000
28 BEECH AVE GARFIELD ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD 280.0 1218 0 0 0 2 2 56,000
29 BEECH AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO WASHINGTON ST 400.0 477 0 0 0 2 2 80,000
41 CEREZO DR CARLSBAD BLVD TO LOS ROBLES DR 245.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 49,000
42 CEREZO DR LOS ROBLES DR TO EL ARBOL DR 285.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 57,000
49 CHESTNUT AVE RAILROAD TO ROOSEVELT ST 550.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 110,000
50 CHESTNUT AVE ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST 390.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 78,000
55 CHESTNUT AVE ADAMS ST TO WOODLAND WY 575.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 115,000
56 CHESTNUT AVE WOODLAND WY TO SPANISH WY 275.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 55,000
57 CHESTNUT AVE SPANISH WY TO HIGHLAND DR 360.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 72,000
69 CHINQUAPIN AVE RAILROAD ST TO HARBOR DR 575.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 115,000
70 CHINQUAPIN AVE HARBOR DR TO BALDWIN LN 290.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 58,000
71 CHINQUAPIN AVE BALDWIN LN TO JEFFERSON ST 235.0 1265 2 0 0 0 2 47,000
75 CHINQUAPIN AVE SYME DR TO STELLA MARIS LN 310.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 62,000
84 CYPRESS AVE OCEAN ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD 600.0 527 0 2 0 2' 120,000 B
98 GARFIELD ST N/o CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR. 945.0 " 0.2 ;Q "0: 189,000 B
100 GARFIELD ST WALNUT AVE TO SYCAMORE AVE 200.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 40,000
102 GARFIELD ST CHESTNUT AVE TO MAPLE AVE 335.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 67,000
103 GARFIELD ST MAPLE AVE TO ACACIA AVE 325.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 65,000
106 GARFIELD ST JUNIPER AVE TO HEMLOCK AVE 230.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 46,000
Page 5 of 11
1/
-1 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1 ByPoints.xls %
i City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 '3.,|; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET ' LIMITS: LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total COST ($] OTHER
107 GARFIELD ST HEMLOCK AVE TO REDWOOD AVE 245.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 49,000
126 HIBISCUS CR ANCHOR WY TO 600" S/O TAMARACK . ' 1400.0 0--0 0 2 0 2 280,000 B
127 HIGHLAND DR RATCUFF RD TO ADAMS ST . 12500.0 3040 0 2 0 0 2 2,500,000 B
133 JAMES DR TAMARACK AVE TO JEANNE PL 240.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 48,000
134 JAMES DR NO NAME ST TO CUL DE SAC- " 300.0 0 • 2 0 0 0 2 60,000 . - C-
156 KNOWLES AVE DAVIS AVE TO CUL DE SAC 565.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 113,000
165 LINCOLN ST OAK AVE TO PINE AVE 390.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 78,000
166 LINCOLN ST PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE 395.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 79,000
187 MAGNOLIA AVE PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST 620.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 124,000
189 MAGNOLIA AVE GRECOURT WY TOfYVETTE WY 260.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 52,000
190 MAGNOLIA AVE YVETTE WY TO HIGHLAND DR 410.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 82,000
199 MONROE ST MAGNOLIA AVE TO KAREN PL 130.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 26,000
200 MONROE ST CHESTNUT AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE 360.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 72,000
225 PARK DR WESTHAVEN DR TO WOODVALE DR 855.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 171,000
226 PARK DR WOODVALE DR TO MONROE ST 855.0 1002. 2 0 0 0 2 171,000
232 PINE AVE HARDING ST TO 1-5 580.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 116,000
234 PINE AVE GARFIELD ST TO L'INCOLN ST 255.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 51,000
236 PIO PICO DR 350" N/O YOURELL AVE TO LAGUNA DR-3500.0. 2507 • 0 2 0 0 2 700,000 B
237 PIO PICO DR OAK AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE ' 1550.0 2507 0 2 0 0 2 310,000 B
250 SPRUCE ST YOURELL AVE TO FOREST AVE 490.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 98,000
260 TAMARACK AVE ADAMS ST TO MARGARET WY 660.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 132,000
269 VALLEY ST JAMES DR TO OAK AVE 320.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 64,000
271 VALLEY ST EVERGREEN DR TO BONITA LN 280.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 56,000
273 VALLEY ST VALLEY PL TO BASSWOOD AVE 370.0 1398 2 0 0 0 2 74,000
280 WALNUT AVE GARFIELD ST TO LINCOLN ST 260.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 52,000
281 WALNUT AVE LINCOLN ST TO WASHINGTON ST 475.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 95,000
24 BASSWOOD AVE HIGHLAND DR TO JAMES DR 500.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 100,000
31 BLENKARNE DR ESTWOOD DR TO 590' W/O WESTWOOD DR S/ENl 590.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 118,000
40 CATALINA DR CHESTNUT AVE TO TRIESTE DR 1540.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 308,000
•^0
Page 6 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1 ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 . • 3 ; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET LIMITS! LENGTH ADT GIP A B 0 D Total COST [$] OTHER
47 CHESTNUT AVE GARFIELDiST TO LINCOLN ST 260.0 0 1 0 0 0
Total
52,000
68 CHINQUAPIN AVE GARFIELD ST TO RAILROAD 820.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 164,000
72 CHINQUAPIN AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HARRISON ST 505.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 101,000
76 CHINQUAPIN AVE STELLA MARIS LN TO, HIGHLAND DR 375.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 75,000
89 EL ARBOL DR CEREZO DR TO MANZANO DR 910.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 182,000
90 EL ARBOL DR CANNON RD TO CEREZO DR 1515.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 303,000
95 FALCON DR WESTWOOD DR TO DONNA DR 245.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 49,000
101 GARFIELD ST SYCAMORE AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 205.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 41,000
105 GARFIELD ST CHERRY AVE TO JUNIPER AVE 300.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 60,000
110 GARFIELD ST SEQUOIA AVE TO CHINQUAPIN AVE 275.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 55,000
125 HEMLOCK AVE E/0 GARFIELD ST 765.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 153,000
153 JUNIPER AVE E/0 GARFIELD ST 765.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 153,000
167 LINCOLN ST WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE 405.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 81,000
171 LOS ROBLES DR (E & W) CANNON RD TO CEREZO DR (ALLEY) 1530.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 306,000
172 LOS ROBLES DR (E & W) CEREZO DR TO MANZANO DR (ALLEY) 890.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 178,000
186 MAGNOLIA AVE HARDING ST TO CUL DE SAC 190.0 0 1 0 .0 0 1 38,000
213 OAK AVE VALLEY ST TO CANYON ST 740.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 148,000
217 PALM AVE MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST 345.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 69,000
218 PALM AVE JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST 340.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 68,000
219 PALM AVE HARDING ST TO CUL DE SAC 205.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 41,000
227 PINE AVE LINCOLN ST TO WASHINGTON ST 485.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 97,000
261 TAMARACK AVE MARGARET WY TO POLLY LN 215.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 43,000
270 VALLEY ST OAK AVE TO EVERGREEN DR 160.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32,000
272 VALLEY ST BONITA LN TO VALLEY PL 435.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 87,000
285 WESTWOOD DR NE/0 MONROE ST TO 70' S/O BLENKARNE DR N/E 1180.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 236,000
3 ADAMS AVE BASSWOOD AV TO CHESTNUT AV 1050.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 ..-•• B
16 ALDER AVE MONROE ST TO CUL DE SAC 1010.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202,000 B
17 . ALTHEA LN ANDREA AVE TO CDS ' , 250.0 . 0 iO^ iOv 0 0 50,000 C
18 ANDREA AVE VALLEY ST TO CDS • 690.0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 138,000 c
/
Page 7 of 11 I APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1ByPoints.xls %
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 1 2 , 3 i 4 5 6 7 81 9 10 11 12 13 1
ID STREET i LIMITS 1 LENGTH ADT CIP A B c D Total
0
COST [$] OTHER
19 ANN DR GAYLE WY TO JANIS WY ' ^ , 530 0 - 0. 0 0 0 0
Total
0 106,000 B
20 ARBUCKLE PL • - MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST i-300.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 C
21 ARLAND RD , HIGHLAND DR TO BUENA VISTA WY'.- I ,r, 320.0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 64,000 B
22 AVOCADO LN ' - ' HARDING ST TO CDS' ' 400.0 . //Ov 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 C
26 BASSWOOD AVE VALLEY ST TO RIDGECREST DR '"r-2600.0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 520,000 B
27 BEECH AVE OCEAN STTOQARFIELD.ST, -210.0-0 0 0 0 0 )i-;/:;05/'^ 42,000 B
30 BELLE LN BASSWOOD AVE TO CDS ' 190.0 ' 0 0 0 10/ 0 38,000 C
32 BUENA PL JEFFERSON ST TO CDS' \ 570 0 : 0" 0 0 0 0 114,000 C
33 BUENA VISTA CR N/O LAGUNA DR . - > , ^ . 1550.0 -> 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 310,000 B
34 BUENA VISTA WY JEFFERSON ST TO DAVIS AVE •' '780.0 591 0 0 0 0 0 156,000 C
35 CAMDEN CR RIDGECREST DR TO CDS ^ ' -,170.0 . 0 0 0 0 0 iffi/Ol:/-;.. 34,000 C
36 CAMELLIA PL \HARDING ST TO CDS ' . 380.0 • 0 0 w w. 76.000 ' C
37 CAMINO DEL SOL CR ...ADAMS ST TO CDS 260.0 0 0 0 0 0 ;KS:G//// 52,000 C
38 CANYON ST OAK AVE TO BASSWOOD AVE -900.0 0 0 0 0 0 sc-;:o'://,-180,000 B
43 CHARLEEN CR DONNA DR TO CDS' , • '. , 600.0: , 0 0 0 0 120,000 C
44 CHARTER OAK DR SEACREST DR TO RIDGECREST DR 500.0, 0 io;=: 0 SO-v 100,000 , B .
79 CIPRIANO LN FOREST AVE TO CDS 260.0 ^ 0 -0 52,000 C
80 CITRUS PL , JEFFERSON ST TO CDS -260.0 , O -;' 0 lOf 52,000 c
81 CLEARVIEW DR S/O MACARTHUR AVE 640' 640.0 0 lot So? 128,000 B
82 CREST DR FOREST AVE TO BUENA VISTA WY ^ 1620.0 liloii 324,000 B
83 CYNTHIA LN 270' W/O & 130' E/O GREGORY DR' "400.0 -0 m. mk 80,000 C
85 DATE AVE GARFIELD STTO RAILROAD 640.0 0 0 0 ;-.;-0-/:V' 128,000 B
86 DAVIS AVE BUENA VISTA WY TO UGUNA DR. 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 B
87 DAVIS PL W/O DAVIS AVE 150' , "150.0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 30,000 C
88 DONNA DR CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO CHESTNUT AVE 4000.0 879 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 B
93 ELMWOOD ST BUENA VISTA WY TO LAGUNA DR • -'ii9o:o 485 0 0 0 0 0 238,000 B
94 EUREKA PL BASSWOOD AVE TO CHESTNUT;AVE 1190.0 , . ; 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 238,000 B :
96 FALCON DR DONNA DR TO CUL DE SAO ' -, '900.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 B
97 FOREST AVE HIGHLAND DR TO CREST DR • " 1980.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 396,000 B
)ArT>
Page 8 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1^ 1 ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 .3 . 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET LIMITS; i LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total COST [$] OTHER
111 GAYLE WAY MONROE ST TO DONNA DR - • 660.0 -0 0 :EO:: :/o/ :50--ii.m''.'m'. 132,000 C
112 GLORIA LN • JEANNE PL TO CDS '-" -150.0" • • 0' %0: Sb/ m^ m:': ;//;/b'/•>••/: 30,000 C
114 GREGORY DR CYNTHIA LN TO KNOWLES AVE : ' 280.0 . 0 W-i Ibi; ms ;-//:/o;//./ 56,000 B
115 HARBOR DR - . S/O CHINQUAPIN AVE 1,". • . . 700.0 0 •m JO/ mr •'/?-b/.:i/ 140,000
...&/-• - 116 HARBORVIEW LN ADAMS ST TO CDS ; i-V . . 350.0 0 0 mi iSbi >V;;..;(j/^;?/: 70,000 ;/;.• /C ^' ;'•
123 HARRISON ST CHINQUAPIN AVE TO ADAMS ST. ' -1310.0 . ' 0 sea lb/ ibc: /S/;iO/.;./-. 262,000 B
128 HILLCREST CR SEACREST DR TO CDS - . , ' ' - 150.0 . 0 mi 0 fib?; ?*b/: 0 30,000 • • • C, ;' •
130 HOME AVE E/0 HOPE AVE TO CUL DE SAC -355.0 ' 0 . ibs 0 b 0 0 71,000 B
131 HOOVER ST HIGHLAND DR TO 570' SW/0 ADAMS ST -1420.0 • 0 0 b 0 0 284,000 B
135 JAMES DR JEANNE PL TO NO NAME ST 740.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148,000
136 JANIS WAY BEDFORD CR TO CUL DE SAC^;') 620.0 0 0 m 0 0 124,000. C
137 JANIS WAY ANN DR TO DONNA DR -310.0 0 mi. 0 0 0 0 62,000 B
138 JEANNE PL - . JAMES DR TO CDS,- : - i, . 630.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .126,000 . c .
139 JEFFERSON ST • N/O LAS FLORES t. 580.0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 116,000; B
154 KARREN LN MONROE ST TO CDS - - • 170.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,000 C .
155 KNOWLES AVE JEFFERSON ST TO DAVIS AVE . 610.0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 122,000. B
157 KNOWLES AVE PIO PICO DRTO ELMWOOD ST ' ' 1050 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 B
158 UGUNA DR JEFFERSON ST TO ELMWOOD ST' , 2250.0 605 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 B
159 URKSPUR LN ADAMS ST TO CDS • 460.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; 92,000 C
163 LAS FLORES DR MORNING GLORY LN TO HIGHLAND DR 340.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,000
164 LAURIE CR ANN DRTO CDS 160.0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,000 B' .
168 UNDA LN • MONROE ST TO CDS's 800.0 - 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 c /
169 LOCUST AVE HARRISON ST TO ADAMS ST-490.0 0 WS. i'O/ 'im /:;3/i,/-98,000 B
170 LONG PL - CHINQUAPIN AVE TO CDS 375.0 0 w. m d:' 75,000 0
173 MACARTHUR AVE SUNNYHILL DR TO SKYLINE RD 570.0 0 mc m< '•••0' 0/ ::,-:••/•• :0:. ii4;ooo B
180 MADISON ST GRANT AVE TO ARBUCKLE PL 580.0 0 0 o: /O: / 0 0 //. 116,000 B
181 MADISON ST ARBUCKLE, PL TO LAGUNA DR 800.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000
182 MAEZEL LN BASSWOOD AVE TO'GDS 390.0 0 «bs mi :/b/ 0 / .0-..0-v.-78,000 C
194 MARGARET WY TAMARACKAVETOCDS' -,450.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; 90,000 C
1^ o
Page 9 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 1ByPolnts.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 1 3 r 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET .LIMITS. LENGTH ADT CIP A B C D Total
lS/;:o/'//-
COST [$] OTHER
195 MCKINLEY ST '.,. .PINE AVE TO BASSWOOD AVE- ' ' ' 650.0 0 lb?/ ;/Orf m-. ms
Total
lS/;:o/'//-130,000 B; •.,/--"
196 MEADOWLARK LN' ,^ > RIDGECREST DR TO CDS • 250.0 b 'W' m Wk kk'k^kwkrk 50,000 c
197 MONROE ST • , PARK DRTO SUNNYHILL DR 65b.b •\ 0 SOS 10/ l;bi ••Mi ?.;/:/b:/^'/• 130,000 •;• ;B-.,
201 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR . OCEAN ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD f -i 45b.b 1282 ib'/ IbS :km f/f;/iO.////; 90,000 B .
202 NORMANDIE LN GARFIELD ST TO MOUNTAIN VIEW DR ' -36b.O •b' ibl Ibv •so;;: :;:./:i:-'0>:5/ 72,000 c
212 OAK AVE . PIO PICO DRTO VALLEY ST -. 2400.0 ' . 0. 0 b m 0 480,000 B :
220-PALM AVE , PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST-, - . ' 535.0 0 b M. sb:.: k(kOk:. /•/'•So/;: / 107,000 B :
224 PARK DR TAMARACK AVE TO KELLY DR -2070.0 rtO • b sb:? 0 i/S/or//;. 414,000 •kk-k B' • ••';
233 PINE AVE PIO PICO DRTO HIGHLAND DR 1670.0 ' 0 b 0 0 0 k-k'kXQ::} 334,000 S /.B -/v:/
238 REDWOOD AVE - E/O GARFIELD ST," 635.b / 0.. b 0 0 0 rikmr/c 127,000
.. ••B:--239 RIDGECREST DR BASSWOOD AVE TO CHARTER OAK DR 2700 0 ,0 ' 0 0 0 0 /;;//b'W// 540,000 .: • 246 SANDY PL > CANYON ST TO CDS ^ - '~ 17b.b/ [ .-b , 0 0 0 0 i/:/::b-'-./ 34,000 c
247 SEACREST DR RIDGECREST DR N/ENTR TO S/ENTR - ' 1630.0 b 0 0 0 0 b : 326;000 B
248 SEQUOIA AVE CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST^ . 440.0 0 b 0 0 0 b 88,000 B
249 SKYLINE RD • WESTHAVEN DR TO TELESCOPE AVE 4665.0-0 „ b 0 b 0 b 933,000/ B ; ;
251 SPRUCE ST -YOURELL AVE TO CUL DE SAC ;' 120.0 0 b 0 0 0 b 24,000 B
252 STRATFORD LN PIO PICO DR TO CDS - 750.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 C
253 SUNNYHILL DR MONROE ST TO HILLSIDE DR . 2700.0 893 0 0 b 0 0 540,000 B
263 TRIESTE DR SIERRA MORENA AVE TO GRANADA WY , 120.0 .0 0 0 b 0 0 24,000 Ck
264 TRUESDELL LN BLENKARNE DR TO CDS 300 b b 0 b b 0 0 6b,bbb C
265 TUTTLE ST LAS FLORES DR TO BUENA VISTA WY 76b.b b 0 b b 0 0 152,bb0 B
266 TYLER ST OAK AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE -1380.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 276,000 B ..
267 VALLEY ST BUENA VISTA WY TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 600.0 0 0 HO;' 0 0 0 120,000 B
278 VALLEY PL VALLEY ST TO CUL DE SAC • 260.0 0 SO/ W: M. /•^s/ds/-52,000 C
284 WESTHAVEN DR CHESTNUT AVE TO WOODVALE DR 1100.0 0 0 mk 0/ 0 .;0:/ 220,000 • B ;
286 WILSON ST FOREST AVE TO BUENA VISTA WY . -"1570.0 0. -0 0 0 0 : 6 314,000 B :..
287 WOODLAND WY CHESTNUT AVE TO CDS -' 77b.O b 0 0 b 0 i/v/'O-...-': ; 154,000 c
288 WOODVALE DR PARK DR TO WESTHAVEN DR ' 280.0 0 /•o/ 0 mk 0 :/.,/^0 • :• 56,000 B
289 YOURELL AVE PIO PICO DRTO HIGHLAND DR 1250.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 B
Page 10 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel 'l ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Ehg;Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1 2 11 3; ]• 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ID STREET • ILIMITS i LENGTH ADT CIP A B c D Total COST [$] OTHER j
290 YVETTE WY MAGNOLIA AVE TO CDS I '500.0 I 0 1 0 m :/ol tkf-mm: ioo,bbb 1
'i' •
Column 6 - CIP:
if in the next 5 years = x
Column 7 - A Points=Concentration of overhead
1 =one crossarm ; 1 i
2=two crossarm j i)
3=two crossarm and separate telephone
3=three crossarms ;
!! i
Column 8 - B Points= Traffic Volumes: '
0=less than 1500 ADT
2=1500 to 5000 ADT !
3=5000 to 10,000 ADT ; l , ,
5=more than 10,000 ADT '
Column 9 - C Points=Civic,recreation,scehic:
O=none '
2=adjacent to school
2=adjacent to civic area
2=adjacent to park and recreation
3=adjacent to ocean with view
5=in scenic corridor
J 7 ,53
Column 10 - D Points=Other Factors:
2=in business district
3=CIP project scheduled in 5 years
5=2001 UUAC judgement of high priority
Column 11 - Total Points =A+B-i-C-i-D
Column 12 - Cost = Length x $200/ft
Column 13 - Other Factors:
A = Judgment Factor of high priority
B = Alternative Design Street in NW Quadrant
C = Dead End Street
D = Judgment Factor of low priority
Note:
Streets with Factors B and C have been
shaded since they are unlikely to have the
utilities undergrounded in the near future.
Page 11 of 11 APPENDIX D
9
APPENDIX "E"
Priority Area Boundary IVIap and
Address/Parcel Number
Reference Table
newpclsexported .xls
ID Street Name Street No APN 1
1 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 645 2033051500
2 CHESTNUT AV 525 2041600100
3 CHESTNUT AV 540 2040911300
4 CHESTNUT AV 635 2041722000
5 CHESTNUT AV * 2041103500
6 HARDING ST 3035 2033521500
7 HARDING ST 3042 2033530400
8 HARDING ST 3043 2033521400
9 HARDING ST 3055 2033521300
10 HARDING ST 3075 2033521200
11 HARDING ST 3095 2033521100
12 HARDING ST 3096 2033530600
13 HARDING ST 3156 2041110900
14 HARDING ST 3166 2041111000
15 HARDING ST 3175 2040321200
16 HARDING ST 3244 2041100300
17 HARDING ST 3268 2041103600
18 HARDING ST 3316 2041103000
19 HARDING ST 3330 2041103100
20 HARDING ST 3350 2041100900
21 HARDING ST 3368 2041101000
22 HARDING ST 3380 2041101900
23 HARDING ST 3390 2041101200
24 HARDING ST 3410 2041910100
25 HARDING ST 3430 2041910200
26 HARDING ST 3450 2041910300
27 HARDING ST 3460 2041910400
28 HARDING ST 3482 2041910500
29 HARDING ST 3512 2041912100
30 HARDING ST * 2033530500
31 OAK AV 897 2040321000
32 PINE AV 635 2040820100
33 PINE AV 799 2041000600
34 PINE AV 801 2041000500
35 ROOSEVELT ST 3045 2033060600
36 ROOSEVELT ST 3055 2033060800
37 ROOSEVELT ST 3060 2033051600
38 ROOSEVELT ST 3067 2033060900
39 ROOSEVELT ST 3085 2033061000
40 ROOSEVELT ST 3091 2033061100
41 ROOSEVELT ST 3096 2033050900
42 ROOSEVELT ST 3110 2040841600
43 ROOSEVELT ST 3115 2040850100
44 ROOSEVELT ST 3135 2040850200
45 ROOSEVELT ST 3138 2040841300
46 ROOSEVELT ST 3147 2040850300
47 ROOSEVELT ST 3150 2040841200
48 ROOSEVELT ST 3155 2040850400
49 ROOSEVELT ST 3160 2040841100
50 ROOSEVELT ST 3163 2040850500
51 ROOSEVELT ST 3170 2040841000
7/3/2002
newpclsexported .xls
ID Street Name Street No APN
52 ROOSEVELT ST 3177 2040850600
53 ROOSEVELT ST 3190 2040840900
54 ROOSEVELT ST 3222 2040820200
55 ROOSEVELT ST 3234 2040820300
56 ROOSEVELT ST 3235 2040810300
57 ROOSEVELT ST 3243 2040811400
58 ROOSEVELT ST 3250 2040822000
59 ROOSEVELT ST 3255 2040810600
60 ROOSEVELT ST 3256 2040820600
61 ROOSEVELT ST 3274 2040822100
62 ROOSEVELT ST 3279 2040810900
63 ROOSEVELT ST 3280 2040820900
64 ROOSEVELT ST 3286 2040821000 .
" 65 ROOSEVELT ST 3293 2040814500
66 ROOSEVELT ST 3304 2040920200
67 ROOSEVELT ST 3304 2040920100
68 ROOSEVELT ST 3309 2040910200
69 ROOSEVELT ST 3320 2040920300
70 ROOSEVELT ST 3328 2040920400
71 ROOSEVELT ST 3329 2040910400
72 ROOSEVELT ST 3333 2040910500
73 ROOSEVELT ST 3342 2040920500
74 ROOSEVELT ST 3347 2040910600
75 ROOSEVELT ST 3354 2040920600
76 ROOSEVELT ST 3359 2040910800
77 ROOSEVELT ST 3366 2040922400
78 ROOSEVELT ST 3369 2040910900
79 ROOSEVELT ST 3378 2040922500
80 ROOSEVELT ST 3379 2040911000
81 ROOSEVELT ST 3386 2040911200
82 ROOSEVELT ST 3390 2040922600
83 ROOSEVELT ST 3418 2041721800
84 ROOSEVELT ST 3420 2041721900
85 ROOSEVELT ST 3430 2041722100
. 86 ROOSEVELT ST 3435 2041600300
87 ROOSEVELT ST 3442 2041721500
88 ROOSEVELT ST 3445 2041600400
89 ROOSEVELT ST 3450 2041721400
90 ROOSEVELT ST 3475 2041601600
91 ROOSEVELT ST 3478 2041721300
92 ROOSEVELT ST 3480 2041721200
93 ROOSEVELT ST 3482 2041721100
94 ROOSEVELT ST 3484 2041722200
95 ROOSEVELT ST 3500 2041722300
96 ROOSEVELT ST 3510 2041722400
97 ROOSEVELT ST 3536 2041722500
98 ROOSEVELT ST 3594 2041722600
99 ROOSEVELT ST 525 2041600200
100 ROOSEVELT ST * 2040810800
101 ROOSEVELT ST * 2040841500
102 ROOSEVELT ST * 2040811000
7/3/2002
newpclsexported .xls
ID Street Name Street No APN
103 ROOSEVELT ST * 2033060700
104 ROOSEVELT ST * 2040841400
105 TYLER ST 3258 2040810700
106 TYLER ST 3290 2040811300
107 TYLER ST 3324 2040910300
108 TYLER ST 3350 2040910700
109 TYLER ST 3380 2040911100
110 WALNUT AV 511 2040910100
111 * 2041930100
112 * 2033530700
* - vacant lot
7/3/2002
Jl
APPENDIX "F"
City Map of
Overhead Utility Locations
(In pocket at back of report)