HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 04-59; Bob Baker Jeep Facility Expansion Site; Storm Water Quality; 2005-03-31WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR
BOB BAKER VOLKSWAGEN/SUBARU PROJECT SITE
Job Number 14140
May 24, 2002
Revised: March 31, 2005
RICK
liM LIU\i: ( \ 'Ml'
,( 7 j<,'r !('(',','Mi;.( ( uri
WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR
BOB BAKER VOLKSWAGEN/SUBARU PROJECT SITE
Job Number 14140
Dennis C. Bqwlii R.c.E. mmw
Exp. 06/06
Prepared By:
Rick Engineering Company
Water Resources Department
5620 Friars Road
San Diego, California 92110-2596
(619) 291-0707
L
Prepared For:
Bob Baker Enterprises, Inc.
591 Camino De La Reina, Suite 1100
San Diego, California 92108
(619) 297-1001
May 24, 2002
Revised: March 31, 2005
Water Quality Technical Report
for
Bob Baker VW/Subaru
REVISION PAGE
March 31,2005
Rick Engineering Company has reviewed Plan Check Comments for the Water Quality
Technical Report dated May 24, 2002 in regards to the Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru project
located in the City of Carlsbad. The following is an outline of the City's January 26, 2005 plan
check comments (in italicized lettering) and Rick Engineering Company's responses (in bold
lettering).
1. Change the project title to "Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru Project Site.
The title of the project has been changed throughout to reflect the above title.
2. Update the report date.
The report date will be updated to reflect the submittal date.
^^^^"^ f^t/a/e the Registered Professional Engineer stamp to reflect a current registration.
The Registered Professional Engineer stamp has been updated to reflect current
registration.
4. Include Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist has been included in Appendix
A of this report.
The Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist has been included in
Appendix A of this report.
5. Provide clarification regarding the 8,000 square feet of surface area for site.
The expansion area for the Bob Baker sire is approximately 18,000 square feet. The
expansion area can me seen in the enclosed map in Map Pocket 1 titled, "Site Flan
for Bob Baker VW/Subaru Expansion Project".
6. Clean storm water prior to leaving site.
In the existing condition, the Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru Project drains to the
existing 10-foot inlet located in Paseo Del Norte. The project is not proposing to
drain to the inlet located in Paseo Del Norte. However, the proposed inlet filter
insert will treat the entire tributary area at the sump inlet per the municipal permit.
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/M140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
7. Clean entire site.
The treatment flow that was calculated for the treatment control BMP is based off
of the total area contributing to the 10-foot inlet in Paseo Del Norte. The total area
is 11.4 acres. Please refer to calculations located in Appendix C of this report.
8. Calculate actual capacity you need to consider actual drainage basin for inlet.
The actual treatment capacity for the 10-foot inlet in Paseo Del Norte was calculated
and is located in Appendix C of this report (and is based on the entire tributary area
to the inlet).
9. Comment on the required treatment flow to the 10 foot inlet in Paseo Del Norte.
The treatment flow for the 10-foot inlet in Paseo Del Norte was calculated and is
located in Appendix C of this report.
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
REVISION PAGE FOR BOB BAKER VW/SUBARU
J-14140
DATE REVISION/CHANGES MADE TO PROJECT
24-May-02 Report completed but not submitted
December-04 Report submitted with the May 24, 2002 date
8-Feb-05 Second submittal with City of Carlsbad January 26,2005 plan check
comments addressed
Prepared By:
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division
DCB:FL:nd/Report/14l40.003
05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ^
2.0 Vicinity Map 3
3.0 Water Quality Requirements During Construction 4
4.0 Water Quality Requirements Post-Construction 6
5.0 Permanent Storm Water BMP Selection Procedure 8
6.0 Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMP's) 22
7.0 Anticipated Maintenance Condition(s) 23
8.0 Summary 25
Appendices:
Appendix A: Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklists and Forms
Appendix B: Detail of Inlet Filter Insert - Bio Clean Curb Inlet Basket
Appendix C: Calculations for Water Quality Treatment Flow Requirements and Treatment
Capacity of Inlet Filter Insert
Appendix D: Approximate Costs for Treatment Control BMP's
Appendix E: Location Map For Bob Baker VW/Subaru Project in Hydrologic Basin 904.40
Map Pocket:
Site Plan for Bob Baker VW/Subaru
Prepared By: ' DCB:FL:ndAleport/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This water quality technical report (WQTR) describes the permanent storm water Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that will be incorporated in the project to mitigate the impacts of
urban runoff due to the redevelopment of the Bob Baker Volkswagen(VW)/Subaru expansion
project ("project") located in the City of Carlsbad, California. The project is located at 5500
Paseo Del Norte in Carlsbad. See the Vicinity Map, located in Section 2.0 of this report for the
approximate project location.
The project consists of expansion of approximately 18,000 square feet of surface area at the Bob
Baker Volkswagen/Subaru site. The scope of work includes expanding an existing showroom by
increasing the footprint of an existing building, extend a service bay canopy from the building
addition, resurface the driveway from Paseo Del Norte to the proposed service bay canopy by
removing and replacing asphah concrete pavement, and create six new service kiosks.
The proposed redevelopment of the Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru expansion project will
follow the guidelines and requirements set forth in the City of Carlsbad ''Standard Urban Storm
Water Mitigation Plan, Storm Water Standards: Manual for Construction and Permanent Storm
Water Best Management Practices Requirements,'' (herein referred to as Storm Water
Standards), dated April 2003. Completed copies of the "Storm Water Requirements Applicability
Checklists and Forms" provided within the Storm Water Standards manual has been included in
Appendix A of this WQTR.
Based on the April 2003 City of Carlsbad Storm Water Standards, the current redevelopment is
labeled under the category of "Significant Redevelopment". However, this category is not
mentioned in the "Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklists". According to the
"Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklists", the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension
Project redevelopment is a "Standard Permanent" project and only adheres to the requirements
that fall under this category. However, the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project will
incorporate a treatment control BMP to treat the storm water runoff prior to discharging into the
public storm drain.
The project drains to Paseo Del Norte via surface flow and two existing 4-inch PVC sidewalk
underdrains. Storm water runoff from the site enters an existing 10.0-foot opening San Diego
Regional Standard Type B curb inlet located in Paseo Del Norte approximately 60 feet
downgradient from the site.
Since the project site is less than one acre, and not part of a larger common plan of development,
the project is not subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
requirements during construction. However, the project owner is responsible to ensure that the
project complies with the NPDES requirements given in the Clean Water Act including
preventing the discharge of sediment or other pollutants in storm water rtinoff from the site.
Water quality requirements for pre- and post-construction are discussed in further detail in
Section's 3.0 and 4.0 of this report.
The proposed redevelopment of the project site will not increase the amount impervious surfaces
from existing to proposed conditions. As a result, there will not be an increase in storm water
runoff as compared to existing conditions. Further discussion of the hydrologic and
environmental impacts of the Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru expansion project and the selection
of BMPs are discussed in Section 5.0 of this report.
The project will provide permanent storm water BMPs to ensure that water quality treatment is
provided prior to storm water runoff discharging into the public storm drain system. Further
discussion of permanent storm water BMPs are discussed in Section 6.0 and the maintenance
conditions for the proposed permanent storm water BMPs are discussed in Section 7.0 of this
report.
2.0 VICINITY MAP
3.0 WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION
In April of 2003, the City of Carlsbad issued the Storm Water Standards manual which states the
following: "The primary objectives of the Storm Water Standards manual requirements are to:
(1) Effectively prohibit non-storm water discharges; and (2) Reduce the discharge of pollutants
from storm water conveyance systems to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP statutory
standard) both during construction and throughout the use of a developed site." The Storm
Water Standards manual is "intended to provide information on how to comply with all of the
City's permanent and construction storm water BMP requirements, for new private and public
development projects in the City of Carlsbad." The effective date of the City's Storm Water
Standards manual is December 2, 2002, and applies to all projects requiring any permit approvals
on or after December 2, 2002
The Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru expansion project is not subject to the requirements of the
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 99-08-DWQ National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS000002 (General Construction
Permit) or Order No. 2001-046, modifications to the General Construction Permit, during the
construction phase. The SWRCB adopted the General Construction Permit on August 19, 1999,
and the modifications to the General Construction Permit on April 26, 2001. The General
Construction Permit and modifications to the General Construction Permit are for projects 1 acre
or greater in size, or projects that are part of a larger common plan of development that is 1 acre
or greater in size. Therefore, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is not required
for this project. However, a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP) will be provided upon final
design. It is anticipated that Rick Engineering Company will prepare a WPCP to identify all
construction BMP requirements required by Section IV of the Storm Water Standards. The
expansion area at the project site is approximately 0.4 acres, and is not part of a larger common
plan of development. However, the project owner is responsible to ensure that the project
complies with the NPDES requirements given in the Clean Water Act including preventing the
discharge of sediment or other pollutants in storm water runoff from the site. Temporary BMPs
will be used during construction to prevent the discharge of sediment or other pollutants in storm
water runoff from the project site.
In the site's present state, the pollutants of concern for the site include sediment, trash and debris,
and oil and grease (due to presence of parking and impervious surfaces). During construction the
pollutants of concern on the site are sediment and non-visible pollutants. The site owner is
responsible to prevent these pollutants from leaving the site by implementing temporary BMPs.
Typical temporary BMPs that may be used during construction include good housekeeping
practices and erosion and sediment control measures. Good housekeeping practices include
practices such as street sweeping, waste disposal, vehicle and equipment maintenance, concrete
washout area, materials, storage, and minimization, proper handling, and storage of hazardous
materials. Typical erosion and sediment control measures include silt fences, fiber rolls, gravel
bags, temporary desilting basins, velocity check dams, temporary ditches or swales, storm water
inlet protection, soil stabilization measures such as erosion control mats, tackifier, or hydroseed,
and other measures. The City of Carlsbad's Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Plan
(JURMP) provides lists of minimum BMPs and additional BMP requirements for construction
sites. Several BMP handbooks including the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Practice Guidelines,
the California Storm Water Management Handbooks, etc. provide design standards for the
BMPs.
The following section of this WQTR, Section 4.0, provides information on the water quality
requirements for the project site, following the completion of the project (post-construction).
4.0 WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS POST-CONSTRUCTION
The project is subject to the requirements of the Municipal Storm Water Permit (Municipal
Permit) adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region
(SDRWQCB), Order No. 2001-01, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
No. CAS0108758 draining the watersheds of the County of San Diego, the incorporated cities of
San Diego County, and the San Diego Unified Port District. The project owner is responsible to
ensure that the project complies with the NPDES requirements given in the Clean Water Act
including preventing the discharge of sediment or other pollutants in storm water runoff.
Therefore, the site owner is responsible to prevent these pollutants from entering the public
storm drain system by implementing permanent BMP's. The amount of runoff that must be
treated may be calculated using volume-based criteria or flow-based criteria, depending on the
type of best management practice (BMP) selected to meet this requirement. The Municipal
Permit provides several criteria for calculating treatment volume of runoff for volume-based
BMPs or treatment flow for flow-based BMPs. The Municipal Permit also requires that new
developments maintain or reduce pre-development erosion and protect stream habitat. This may
be accomplished by controlling peak discharge rates and velocities.
The Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru property on which the project is located is in the category
(established by the Municipal Permit) of "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requiremenf'.
This category is not a priority development category. According to the "Storm Water
Requirements Applicability Checklists", the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project
redevelopment is a "Standard Permanent" project and only adheres to the requirements that fall
under this category. However, the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project will incorporate a
treatment control BMP to treat the storm water runoff prior to discharging into the public storm
drain. Typical storm water pollutants that may be anticipated from a development such as the
existing development include trash, heavy metals, and oil and grease. While the site is not
expected to generate a large volume of sediment once buildout, some sediment will be tracked in
by cars and a small amount may be generated on site. This sediment is defined as a pollutant,
and may also contain attached pollutants such as heavy metals. The majority of these typical
pollutants will be transported by low flows occurring during the initial stage of a storm event.
The following section of this WQTR, Section 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0, provides information on the
permanent BMP selection for the project site and anticipated maintenance.
5.0 PERMANENT STORM WATER BMP SELECTION PROCEDURE
Section III of the Storm Water Standards Manual outlines the procedtire for selection of
permanent BMPs. Step 1 of the procedure is to identify pollutants and conditions of concern.
Step 2 of the procedure is to select and establish BMPs. These steps will be discussed in this
section of the WQTR. The specifics regarding design of the selected BMPs (as applicable) will
be discussed in Section 6.0 of this WQTR.
Step 1 - Identify Pollutants and Conditions of Concern
l.A Pollutants from the Project Area
Table 2 of the Storm Water Standards (Section III.l.A), "Anticipated and Potential Pollutants
Generated by Land Use Type", indicates general pollutant categories that are either anticipated
or potential pollutants for specific project categories. The current redevelopment is labeled under
the category of "Significant Redevelopment" and does not fall under the "Priority Project
Checklist". However, the Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru Extension Project will incorporate a
treatment control BMP to treat the categories listed below. The applicable sections of Table 2 of
the Storm Water Standards Manual have been reproduced below in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 - Anticipated and Potential Pollutants Generated By Land Use Type
General Pollutant Categories
Priority
Project
Categories
Sediment Nutrients
Heavy
Metals
Organic
Compounds
Trash
&
Debris
Oxygen
Demanding
Substances
Oil&
Grease
Bacteria
&
Viruses
Pesticides
Commercial
Development p(l) p(l) p{2) X p{5) X p(3) p(5)
>100,000 ft^
Parking Lots p(l) p(l) X X p(l) X p(l)
X = anticipatec
P = potential
(1) A potential pollutant if landscaping exists on-site.
(2) A potential pollutant if the project includes uncovered parkin g areas.
(3) A potential pollutant if land use involves food or animal waste products.
(4) Including petroleum hydrocarbons.
(5) Including solvents.
Source: City of Carlsbad - Storm Water Standards, April 2003, Section 3 - Table 2
Based on the information in Table 5.1 (above), anticipated pollutants for the project includes the
following: Heavy Metals, Trash and Debris, and Oil and Grease. Potential pollutants that are not
already listed as "anticipated" include the following: Sediments, Nutrients, Organic Compounds,
Oxygen Demanding Substances, Bacteria and Viruses, and Pesticides. Due to the small amount
of landscaping on-site and that the majority of the landscaping is bounded by a concrete curb,
nutrients, oxygen demanding substance, and pesticides are not expected pollutants for this
project site. In addition, due to the physical characteristics of this site, bacteria and viruses are
not expected pollutants for this project site. However, while the site is not expected to generate a
large volume of sediment once build-out has been completed, some sediment will be tracked in
by cars and a small amount may be generated on site. This sediment is defined as a pollutant, and
may also contain attached pollutants such as heavy metals (anticipated for parking lots and
streets/highways). Also, Organic Compounds will be a potential pollutant due to the uncovered
parking areas. The majority of anticipated and potential pollutants will be transported by low
flows that typically occur during the initial stage of a storm event.
l.B Pollutants of Concern in Receiving Waters
According to the "Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9)", dated September 8,
1994, the proposed Bob Baker Volkswagen/Subaru redevelopment project is within the Carlsbad
Hydrologic Unit and Encinas Hydrologic Area. The corresponding number designation is
904.40 (Region '9', Hydrologic Unit '04', Hydrologic Area '4', and Hydrologic Subarea 0).
Both the existing and proposed conditions for the project site indicate that storm water runoff
will enter into an existing storm drain system in Paseo Del Norte. The existing underground
storm drain system flows in a northerly direction and eventually discharges to the Pacific Ocean.
An exhibit has been provided in Appendix E of this report thled, "Location Map for Bob Baker
VW/Subaru Project in Hydrologic Basin 904.40," which shows the project location in reference
to Hydrologic Unit (HU) 904.40. The exhibit in Appendix E is the Geographic Information
Systems (GIS) version of the hydrologic basin boundaries provided within the "Water Quality
Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9)," prepared by the SWRCB, dated September 8, 1994.
On February 4, 2003, the SWRCB adopted the 2002 CWA Section 303(d) List (which was later
approved in July 2003 by the USEPA) to update the previous 1998 Clean Water Act Section
303(d) List. There are no water bodies within Hydrologic Unit 904.40 currently listed as
impaired on the 2002 CWA Section 303(d) List. Therefore, the Bob Baker VW/Subaru
Expansion redevelopment project does not discharge directiy into a 303(d) listed impaired water
body and is not subject to the requirements of a 303(d) listing.
For the purpose of identifying primary and secondary pollutants of concern (as defined in the
Storm Water Standards manual), there have been no primary pollutants of concern identified
since the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Expansion redevelopment project outfall location is not within
200 feet of an impaired or Environmentally Sensitive Area. Therefore, each of the pollutants
anticipated to be generated by the project, as identified in Table 5.1 - Anticipated and Potential
Pollutants Generated by Land Use Type (Section III.I.A in the Storm Water Standards manual),
have been considered secondary pollutants of concern. These secondary pollutants of concern
were discussed eariier in this section of the report, subtitled "Pollutants from the Project Area",
and were identified as the following: Heavy Metals, Trash and Debris, and Oil and Grease (while
"potential" secondary pollutants include Sediment and Organic Compounds).
l.C Conditions of Concern
Common impacts to the hydrologic regime resulting from redevelopment typically consist of the
following: increased runoff volume and velocity; reduced infiltration; increased flow frequency,
duration, and peaks; faster time to reach peak flow; and water quality degradation. Conditions of
concern for the project are related to any changes to the hydrologic regime for the project site
that may cause adverse impacts to downstream channels and habitat integrity.
The project site does not receive off-site drainage from any of the adjacent lots. In addition, the
common impacts resulting from redevelopment are not a concern based on the minimal change
form existing to propose. An exhibit has been provided in Map Pocket I of this report, titied
"Site Plan for the Bob Baker VW/Subaru", which provides the redeveloped project layout and
drainage patterns for on-site runoff As shown on the exhibh in Map Pocket 1, all on-site storm
water runoff is directed towards the 10.0-foot Type B Inlet in Paseo Del Norte.
The pre-project condition for the site is mostly paved and impervious and includes one existing
building. The post-project condition will not alter from that of the pre-project condition.
Therefore, the impervious area does not change form the pre-project condition. For both the pre-
project and post-project conditions, runoff will predominantly sheet flow with some
concentration along existing curbs and proposed ribbon gutters. In both conditions, the surface
runoff is directed in a westerly direction where storm water runoff discharges off-site. In the pre-
and post-project condition, runoff discharges to the existing curb and gutter along Paseo Del
Norte, and is collected approximately 60-feet downstream at an existing 10.0-foot Type B inlet.
Since the general drainage patterns remain the same from pre-project to post-project conditions,
and the fact that the amount of impervious area remains the same, there will be no measurable
increase to peak storm water runoff, volume, or velocity.
The redevelopment of the project site will provide post-construction BMPs to ensure that water
quality treatment is provided prior to discharging storm water runoff into the existing
underground public storm drain system located within Paseo Del Norte. The existing public
storm drain system in Paseo Del Norte flows north where it eventually discharges to the Pacific
Ocean. See the exhibh titied "Site Plan for the Bob Baker VW/Subaru", located in Map Pocket
1, to view the locations where the on-site runoff is captured by the off-site public storm drain
system. The post-construction BMP that will be provided will mitigate for impacts that may
otherwise be expected to adversely affect downstream channels and habitat integrity.
Due to the fact that there is not a change in the hydrologic regime and the post-project runoff will
be treated before it enters the public storm drain system, the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Expansion
Project does not contain any downstream conditions of concern.
Step 2 - Establish Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices
Step 2 of the procedure is to identify and implement all applicable BMPs for the project.
Pursuant to the Storm Water Standards. "Applicants may employ alternative comparable and
equally effective site design and source control BMPs (including requirements applicable to
individual priority project categories), satisfactory to the City Engineer." Priority Projects
are also subject to implement the BMP requirements applicable to individual priority project
categories, as listed in Table 5.2 - Standard Development Project & Priority Project Storm Water
BMP Requirement Matrix, within Section II. 1 of the Storm Water Standards. The applicable
sections of Table 5.2 of the Storm Water Standards have been reproduced below in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2 - Standard Development Project & Priority Project Storm Water BMP
Requirements Matrix
Site
Design
BMPs f'
Source
Control
BMPs"
BMPs Applicable to Individual Priority Project Categories'-
3
o .2 =y
o o Q
ffl
o c
c B
'3
o o
O
.3 I
0-<L> O
•e
3
00
3
.E 'E,
u
•a Treatment
Control
BMPs'*'
Standard
Projects
R R O 0 O O O O O O O O O
Priority
Projects
Commercial
Development
greater than
100,000 ft^
R R R R R R
Parking Lots R R R(5)
R = Required: select one or more applicable and appropriate BMPs from the applicable steps in Section III.2.A-D, or
equivalent as identified in Appendix C.
O = Optional/ or may be required by City staff. As appropriate, applicants are encouraged to incorporate treatment
control BMPs and BMPs applicable to individual priority project categories into the project design. City staff may
require one or more of these BMPs, where appropriate.
S = Select one or more applicable and appropriate treatment control BMPs from Appendix C.
(1) Refer to Section III.2.A.
(2) Refer to Section III.2.B.
(3) Priority project categories must apply specific storm water BMP requirements, where applicable. Priority
projects are subject to the requirements of all priority project categories that apply.
(4) Refer to Section I1I.2.D.
(5) Applies if the paved area totals >5,000 square feet or with >I5 parking spaces and is potentially exposed to
urban runoff.
Source: Storm Water Standards Manual, 2003
The project will integrate urban storm water management controls and implement permanent
storm water BMPs to ensure that water quality treatment is provided prior to storm water runoff
discharging into public storm drain system. The following sections 2.a through 2.c of this
WQTR will discuss the permanent storm water BMPs proposed for the project. The specifics
regarding design of the selected BMPs (as applicable) will be discussed in Section 6.0 of this
WQTR. Underlined and/or italicized text in the following discussion represents headings and
line items from Section II.2 of the Storm Water Standards manual. Portions of tiie italicized text
are condensed from the Storm Water Standards manual. The text following the underiined or
italicized text is the response as it relates to the Bob Baker project.
2.a Site Design
"Site design BMP" means any project design feature that reduces the creation or severity of
potential pollutant sources, reduces the alteration of the project site's natural flow regime, or
maintains or reduces pre-development erosion and protects stream habitat. Bob Baker
VW/Subaru Expansion redevelopment project is a redevelopment project located in an existing
urbanized area. Site design BMPs will be applied where possible.
The following discussion identifies the site design BMPs from Section II.2.A of the Storm Water
Standards Manual that is proposed for the project.
Maintain Pre-Development Rainfall Runoff Characteristics
1. Minimize impervious footprint
The Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project consist of the expansion of an existing showroom,
the addition of six new kiosk onto existing pavement, and the re-paving of an existing asphalt.
Therefore, there is no addition of impervious footprint for the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension
Project.
2. Conserve natural areas.
The Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project is located on an existing development that consists
of approximately 2.8 acres of impervious land. Therefore, there is no natural area to conserve.
3. Minimize directly connected impervious areas.
The redevelopment project will stay consistent with the existing drainage patterns. Currentiy, the
existing site drains to an existing inlet in Paseo Del Norte.
4. Maximize canopy interception and water conservation consistent with the Carlsbad
Landscaping Manuel.
The redevelopment project will stay consistent with the existing drainage patterns. Currently, the
existing site drains to an existing inlet in Paseo Del Norte.
Protect Slopes and Channels
5. Convey runoff safely from the tops of slopes.
There are no proposed slopes associated with this project. The redevelopment project will stay
consistent with the existing drainage patterns. Currently, the existing site drains to an existing
inlet in Paseo Del Norte.
6. Vegetate slopes with native or drought tolerant vegetation.
There are no proposed slopes associated with this project.
7. Stabilize permanent channel crossings.
Currently, there are no channel crossings within the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project.
8. Install energy dissipaters, at the outlets of new storm drains, culverts, conduits, or channels
...to minimize erosion.
The Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project does not propose any new storm drains, culverts,
conduits, or channels.
2.B Source Control BMPs
Source control BMPs (both structural and non-structural) means land use or site planning
practices, or structures that aim to prevent urban runoff pollution by reducing the potential for
contamination at the source of pollution. Source control BMPs minimizes the contact between
pollutants and urban runoff. General examples of source control BMPs include roof structures
over trash or material storage areas, and berms around fiiel dispensing areas.
The following discussion identifies the source control BMPs from Section II.2.B of the Storm
Water Standards Manual that is proposed for the project.
Design Outdoor Material Storage Areas to Reduce Pollution Introduction
9. Hazardous material with the potential to contaminate urban runoff.
The Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project does not propose any material storage for the
redeveloped site.
Design Trash Storage Areas to Reduce Pollution Introduction
10. Trash storage areas.
Existing trash storage areas contain lids that keep the trash covered. There will not be any change
to the trash storage area.
Use Efficient Irrigation Systems & Landscape Design
11. Employ rain shutoff devices.
At this time, landscape plans have not been prepared. However, it is anticipated that the plans
will include rain shutoff devices.
12. Design irrigation systems to each landscaped area's.
At this time, landscape plans have not been prepared. However, h is anticipated that the plans
will include an irrigation system in the proposed landscaped area.
Provide Storm Water Conveyance Svstem Stenciling and Signage
13. Provide concrete stamping, porcelain tile, inset permanent marking or equivalent...of all
storm water conveyance system inlets and catch basins within the project area....
There are no proposed conveyance systems within the redevelopment.
14. Post signs and prohibitive language and/or graphical icons, which prohibit illegal dumping
at public access points along channels and creeks within the project area, trailheads and
parks.
There are no channels and/or creeks within the redevelopment area.
2.C BMPs Applicable to Individual Priority Project Categories
The Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project consists of a redevelopment of an existing
impervious site. The project is an extension of an existing building, the repaying of asphah, and
the addition of six new kiosks unto an already impervious area. The total approximate area is
18,000 sqf. The City of Carisbad Storm Water Standards labels this project under "Significant
Redevelopment". However, based on the Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist
(located in Appendix A of this report), the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project does not fall
under the "Priority Project BMP Requirements" category. The project does however fall under
the "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements", which requires the implementation
of sight and source design BMPs. However, the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project will
incorporate a treatment control BMP to treat the runoff prior to discharging into the public storm
drain. Therefore, the "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" will be met.
2.C Treatment Control
"Treatment Control (Structural) BMP" means any engineered system designed and constructed
to remove pollutants from urban runoff. Pollutant removal is achieved by simple gravity settling
of particulate pollutants, filtration, biological uptake, media adsorption or any other physical,
biological, or chemical process.
The following discussion identifies the treatment control BMPs from Section II.2.C of the Storm
Water Standards manual that is proposed for the project.
Based on Table 5.1 - Anticipated and Potential Pollutants Generated By Land Use Type, the
project is anticipated to generate the following pollutants of concern: Heavy Metals, Trash and
Debris, and Oil and Grease. Therefore, these pollutants shall be given priority in selecting
treatment BMPs. Table 5.3 of the Storm Water Standards manual provides a guide to treatment
control BMP selection. The applicable portion of Table 5.3 is reproduced below (Table 5.3).
Table 5.3 -Treatment Control BMP Selection Matrix**'
Pollutant of
Concern
Treatment Control BMP Categories
Biofilters
Detention
Basins
Infiltration
Basins'"
Wet Ponds or
Wetlands
Drainage
Inserts Filtration
Hydrodynamic
Separator
Systems*^*
Heavy Metals M M M H L H L
Trash &
Debris
L H U U M H M
Oil & Grease M M U u L H L
(1) Including trenches and porous pavement.
(2) Also known as hydrodynamic devices and baffle boxes.
L: Low removal efficiency
M: Medium removal efficiency
H: High removal efficiency
U: Unknown removal efficiency
Sources: Guidance Specifying Management Measures for Sources of Nonpoinl Pollution in Coastal Waters (1993),
National Stormwater Best Management Practices Database (2001), and Guide for BMP Selection in Urban Developed
Areas (2001).
Source: City of Carlsbad- Storm Water Standards, April 2003, Section III. 2 - Table 4
In selecting treatment control BMPs for the project, each of the following Treatment Control
BMP categories from Table 5.3 were evaluated:
• Biofihers - Biofiltration is a process that uses vegetation for the purpose of slowing water
velocity and filtering out pollutants. Bioretention areas are landscape features that typically
consist of a grass buffer strip, sand bed, ponding area, organic layer or mulch layer, planting
soil, and plants. Storm water runoff is treated through a variety of physical, biological, and
chemical treatment processes. Bioretention was not selected as the treatment BMP for the
project because the landscaped areas could not practicably handle the drainage areas in a
manner that would provide the required treatment, and ponding water in this urbanized area
is not desirable.
• Detention Basins - Extended detention basins have outiets that are designed to detain storm
water runoff from a water quality design storm for a minimum period of time (e.g., 24 hours)
to allow particles and associated pollutants to settle out. The required volume of an extended
detention basin is calculated based on the runoff coefficient, depth of rainfall, and drainage
area. Due to the area required for an extended detention basin, h was not a practicable option
to provide water quality treatment and was not selected as a BMP for the project.
Infiltration Basins - Infiltration basins are basins in which the majority of runoff from a water
quality design storm is infiltrated into the soil rather than discharged to a surface water body.
Infiltration basins are volume-based, but also have surface area restrictions that are based on
volume, hydraulic conductivity, and drawdown time. In addition, infiltration basins are
limited to areas with highly permeable soils and areas where the groundwater table is at least
10 feet below the ground surface. Due to the area required for an infiltration basin, it was not
a practicable option to provide water quality treatment and was not selected as a BMP for the
project.
Wet Ponds or Wetlands - Wet ponds and constructed wetlands are basins that temporarily
retain storm water runoff and maintain a permanent pool. Pollutant removal is achieved by
biological uptake of pollutants, filtration by vegetation and by soil, and settiing. Wet ponds
and constructed wetiands are volume-based, and the required water quality volume is three
times that of extended detention basins due to the permanent pool. Due to the area required
for wet ponds or wetlands, it was not a practicable option to provide water quality treatment
and was not selected as a BMP for the project. It is also undesirable to have ponded water in
this urbanized area.
Drainage Inserts - Drainage inserts are inlet filter inserts that are screening devices that
remove trash, debris, and some sediment from runoff and may contain sorbent material
designed to remove oil and grease as well as other pollutants. There are numerous designs
for drainage inserts that are marketed by several manufacturers. Drainage inlet filter inserts
(with sorbent material added) were selected for the project because they are the most
practicable in terms of constructibility, maintenance accessibility and cost when compared
with other BMPs.
• Filtration - Filtration devices contain filter media that removes pollutants from runoff
through absorption or adsorption. Filtration systems may be open beds such as a sand filter or
organic filter, or manufactured units of filter media contained within constructed vauhs.
Filtration devices were not selected for the project because they are not the most practicable
for the project in terms of constructibility, maintenance accessibility, and cost when
compared with other BMPs.
• Hydrodynamic Separator Systems - Hydrodynamic separators are flow-through structures
with a settling or separation unit that removes sediment and other pollutants. No outside
power source is required because the energy of the flowing storm water allows the sediment
to efficientiy settle out. Hydrodynamic separators were not selected for the Bob Baker
VW/Subaru Extension Project because they are not the most practicable for the project in
terms of constructibility, maintenance accessibility, and cost when compared with other
BMPs.
Pursuant to the above discussion of each category of BMPs, the following BMPs are chosen to
treat the pollutants of concern to the maximum extent practicable (MEP):
Drainage inlet filter inserts, with sorbent material added
Drainage inlet filter inserts were selected because drainage inserts are the most practicable
solution for the project characteristics, location, and targeted pollutants. Drainage inlet filter
inserts (with sorbent material added) reduce sediment, trash, debris, oil and grease from the flow
as well as other pollutants that attach to sediment (such as heavy metals).
The design of these BMPs will be discussed in more detail in the following Section 6.0.
6.0 PERMANENT STORM WATER BMP
In order to meet the Municipal Permit requirements, the project will include installation of an
inlet filter insert with sorbent material in the existing 10.0-foot San Diego Regional Standard
Type B curb inlet located in Paseo Del Norte approximately 60 feet downgradient from the site.
The location of the proposed inlet filter insert is shown on the exhibit entitled, "Site Plan for Bob
Baker VW/Subaru", located in Map Pocket 1.
The inlet filter insert is a flow-based BMP. A detail of the inlet filter insert is provided in
Appendix B. The inlet filter insert must be capable of treating the required treatment flow for the
area of the project site draining to the inlet. The required treatment fiow is calculated using
flow-based numeric sizing criteria from the Municipal Permit. Appendix C provides calculations
for treatment flow requirements for the project based on the following numeric sizing criteria
from Section III.2.D(i) of the Municipal Permit: the maximum flow rate of runoff produced from
a rainfall intensity of 0.2 inch of rainfall per hour.
The area of the project that is being disturbed is approximately 18,000 square feet (0.4 acres).
The total area of the Bob Baker VW/Subaru site is approximately 2.8 acres. Based on the
numeric sizing criteria described above, the required treatment flow rate for the Bob Baker
VW/Subaru site is 0.5 cubic feet per second (cfs). However, due to the location of the inlet filter
insert in the public right-of-way the total treatment area for tiie inlet is approximately 11.4 acres.
Therefore, the treatment flow for the inlet in Paseo Del Norte is 2.2 cfs. Additional calculations
are provided in Appendix C to demonstrate that tiie inlet filter insert has the hydraulic capacity to
treat 2.8 cfs. Therefore, the inlet filter insert proposed with this expansion project will treat fiature
expansion at the site (and the adjacent property tributary to the sump inlet).
7.0 ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE CONDITION(S)
Following the completion of the project, die owner will be responsible for properly disposing of
waste material from within the project site, maintaining landscaped areas in a manner that will
prevent soil erosion and minimize sediment transport, and maintaining drainage facilities located
throughout the project area in a clean manner and in good repair. All post-construction BMPs
will be maintained by the owner. The City of Carisbad will not be required to maintain any of the
proposed BMPs associated with this project.
Typical Maintenance Procedures for Treatment Control BMPs
The maintenance procedure for servicing drainage inlet filter inserts with sorbent material
typically includes contracting the maintenance cleaning/waste removal through a provider of
those services. Drainage inlet filter insert manufacturers often offer servicing for their own
facihties, however, maintenance services are also offered through a variety of other
manufacturers and cleaners.
The frequency of maintenance required is site and drainage area specific. The unit should be
inspected periodically to assure the condhion is adequate to handle anticipated runoff. Initially
following the installation of the new treatment BMP, it is important to check that the unit is
functioning properly and to measure the amount of deposition occurring from specific storm
events. At a minimum, inspections should be made on a monthly basis and after every storm
event to check that the unit is frmctioning properly and whether die unit requires servicing at that
time. Based on these inspections, it may be necessary to adjust the frequency of scheduled
inspections and maintenance cleanings. It is important to note that for the purpose of this
WQTR, anticipated maintenance costs and the frequency of servicing (as discussed below for
"Anticipated Maintenance Cost of Post-Construction Structural BMPs") are approximated and
do not reflect the periodic inspections that are necessary to determine the actual frequency that
site specific unit will require.
specific to the drainage inlet filter inserts provided by Bio Clean Environmental Service, Inc.,
service procedures include the removal of the man hole, removing the drainage inlet filter insert,
properly disposing of the waste, replacing the hydrocarbon absorption boom (sorbent material),
returning the filter to its secure position, returning the man hole to its original position, and
reporting on debris and condition of filters for the maintenance service.
Anticipated Maintenance Cost of Post-Construction Treatment Control BMPs
Refer to Appendix D of this WQTR for a summary of the approximate maintenance costs
associated with the proposed post-construction treatment control BMPs. The annual maintenance
costs provided in Appendix D assume that the structural BMPs will be serviced four times a year
(quarterly). Also, the sorbent material is required to be replaced twice a year. However, periodic
inspections should be made to ensure the unit is frmctioning properly and that the frequency of
maintenance does not need to be adjusted (as described above in "Typical Maintenance
Procedures for Treatment Control BMPs"). It is important to realize the annual maintenance
costs provided within this report are preliminary approximations, which do not reflect the actual
frequency of service that the installed unit may require.
It is important to note that a variety of vendors distribute, install, and maintain these types of
treatment facilities and may offer significantly different costs associated with each unit than
those provided within this report.
Responsible Party for Maintenance and Funding of Structural BMPs
The owner of the Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Project will be responsible for compliance
with the City of Carlsbad Storm Water Standards, (which covers compliance for the Municipal
Permit issued by the San Diego Regional Board). Specifically, the owner of Bob Baker
VW/Subaru Extension Project will be responsible during construction and post-construction
BMPs while the project site is under construction and will maintain all responsibility for the
fimding of the fiature maintenance for all post-construction BMPs when construction of the
project is completed.
8.0 SUMMARY
The project will conform to applicable NPDES requirements during and after construction. The
project will meet tiie requirements during construction by incorporating temporary BMPs for
control of sediment and non-visible pollutants. The completed project will incorporate an inlet
filter insert to meet the applicable requirements of the Municipal Permit. The inlet filter insert is
a fiow-based BMP and has the hydraulic capacity to treat the amount of fiow required for the
project based on numeric sizing criteria established in the Municipal Permit.
Because the project drains into an existing municipal storm drain system, and because the overall
peak discharge at the property boundary is not expected to increase as a result of the project, the
project is not expected to increase downstream erosion.
APPENDIX A
Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklists and Forms
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14l40.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
storm Water Standards
4/03/03
Part D: Determine Construction Site Priority
in accordance witli the IVIunicipal Permit, each construction site with construction Storm
water BMI^ requirements must be designated with a priority: high, medium or low
^.P^WPPP n!^^^^^^ be conipleted with this form, noted on the plans, and included in
the SWPPP or WPCP. Indicate the project's priority in one of the check boxes using the
criteria below, and existing and surrounding conditions of the project the tvoe of
activities necessary to complete the construction and any other extenuatinq
circumstances that may pose a threat to water quality. The City reserves the riqht to
adjust the pnonty of the projects both before and during construction [Note-
The construction pnonty does NOT change construction BMP requirements that apolv
to projects: all construction BMP requirements must be identified on a case-bv-case
basis. The construction priority does affect the frequency of inspections that will be
req"uirements^] ^^^^ °" construction BMP
• A) High Priority
1) Projects where the site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the
rainy season
2) Projects 5 acres or more. 3) Projects 5 acres or more within or directly
adjacent to or discharging directly to a coastal lagoon or other receiving water
within an environmentally sensitive area
Projects, active or inactive, adjacent or tributary to sensitive water bodies
B) Medium Priority
1) Capital Improvement Projects where grading occurs, however a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is not required under the State General
Construction Permit (i.e., water and sewer replacement projects, intersection
and street re-alignments, widening, comfort stations, etc.)
2) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where grading occurs, such as
installation of sidewalk, substantial retaining walls, curb and gutter for an
entire street frontage, etc. , however SWPPPs are not required.
3) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are required
however, Notice Of Intents (NOIs) and SWPPPs are not required.
• C) Low Priority
1) Capital Projects where minimal to no grading occurs, such as signal light and
loop Installations, street light installations, etc.
2) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where minimal to no grading occurs
such as pedestrian ramps, driveway additions, small retaining walls, etc.
3) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are not required,
such as small retaining walls, single-family homes, small tenant
improvements, etc.
32
I
L
C
i:
i:
r
lite
llH
i:
i:
Storm Water Standards
4/03/03
Part 8: Determine Standard Permanent Storm Water Requirements.
Does the project propose:
^' ^^""sidewS^ ^'^^'^ ^® "-ooftops, roads, parking lots, driveways, paths and
2. New pervious landscape areas and irrigation systems?" '
Permanent structures within 100 feet of any natural water body?
Trash storage areas?' ' '
5. Liquid or solid material loading and unloading areas?
6. Vehicle or equipment fueling, washing, or maintenance areas?
7. Require a General NPDES Pemiit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with
Industnal Activities (Except construction)?*
Yes No
8. Commercial or industrial waste handling or storage, excluding typical office or
household waste?
Any grading or ground disturbance during constructionT
10. Any new storm drains, or alteration to existing stomr drains?
To find out if your project is required to obtain an individual General NPDES Pemiit for Storm Water
Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, visit the State Water Resources Control Bo™b site
at, www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwtr/industrial.html
Section 2. Construction Storm Water BMP Requirements:
If the answer to question 1 of Part C is answered "Yes," your project is subject to
Section IV Construction Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). If the answer to question 1 is "No "
J °^ remaining questions is "Yes," your project is subject to
f wT o .p^"^*'^^*'^" Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare
a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). If every question in Part C is answered "No"
your project is exempt from any construction storm water BMP requirements If any of
the answers to the questions in Part C are "Yes," complete the construction site
prioritization in Part D, below.
mm
Would the project meet any of these criteria during construction? Yes No
mm
1. Is the project subject to Calffomia% statewide General NPDES Permit for Storm Water
Discharges Associated With Construction Activities?
'ii. Does the proiect oroDOse aradina nr <tn\\ Hicturhanr^ao
•mm fjivfj\j.^\^ \ji ami uiotUiPgncs f
3. Would stonri w^teror urban runoff have the potential to contact any portion of the
construction area, includinq washing and staqinq areas'?
1^
4. Would the project use any construction materials that could negatively affect water
quality if discharged from the site (such as, paints, solvents, concrete and
stucco)?
m
31
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
I
1
i
i
I
i
I
Storm Water Standards
4/03/03
VI. RESOURCES & REFERENCES
APPENDIX A
STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS APPLICABILITY CHECKLIST
Complete Sections 1 and 2 of the following checklist to determine your project's
permanent and construction storm water best management practices requirements
This form must be completed and submitted with your permit application.
Section 1. Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements:
If any answers to Part A are answered "Yes," your project is subject to the "Priority
Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements," and "Standard Permanent Storm
Water BMP Requirements" in Section III, "Permanent Storm Water BMP Selection
Procedure" in the Storm Water Standards manual.
If all answers to Part A are "No," and any answers to Part B are "Yes," your project is
only subject to the "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" If every
question in Part A and B is answered "No," your project is exempt from permanent
storm water requirements.
Part A: Determine Prioritv Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements.
Does the project meet the definition of one or more of the priority proiect categories?*
1 • Detached residential development of 10 or more units
2. Attached residential development of 10 or more units
3. Commercial development greater than 100,000 square feet
4. Automotive repair shop
5. Restaurant
6.
7.
Steep hillside development greater than 5,000 square feet
Project discharging to receiving waters within Environmentally Sensitive Areas ' —J -J — ^•""a wf^Lx^i^ iririLiiiM i-iIvin^ijjinrmdijy ocribiuvtg rtieas 8. Parking lots greater than or equal to 5,000 ft' or with at least 15 parking spaces and
potentially exposed to urban runoff
9. Streets, roads, highways, and freeways which would create a new paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater
Yes No
* Refer to the definitions section in the Storm Water Staridards for expanded definitions of the prioritv project categones. '
Limited Exclusion: Trenching and resurfacing work associated with utility projects are not considered
pnonty projects. Parking lots, buildings and other structures associated with utility projects are
pnonty projects if one or more of the criteria in Part A is met. If all answers to Part A are -^o?
continue to Part B.
30
storm Water Standards
4/03/03
APPENDIX B
DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
Environmentally
Sensitive Areas
/ - Major Road$
[ ] Carisbad City Boundary
HH Environmentally Sensitive Areas
j./cflrgisJ/producls/planiiinartS\1 O^/EnvSens Areas
34
APPENDIX B
Detail of Inlet Filter Insert - Bio Clean Curb Inlet Basket
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
- —.L-.t >-J^I^^^X^^^^^T^^^-
BIO CLEAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
PO Box 869
0<»an8lda.GAaa040
Offioa: (780) 433-7640
Fax: (760)43^176
w«w.bk)oteanenvfconmental.not
THE CAUFORNIA CURB SHEIP BASKET WATER CLEANSING SYSTEM
HjGH CAPACITY CURB IM FT RASKFT
TTie Curb Shelf Basket Shelf waer Cleaning System
Hgurel
Details Of Shelf System (Dimensions will vaiv)
RQurea
f^J^^P CANISTER SQUARF
RJOWHATE
Tcp-Skto
Contar-Skto
BcAim-aiii
TOTAL
80
isoias
tSSJBO
eai4
SLfiO
11^
2081
Zfl6
3.17
2.11
11J6S
NOTES:
I.
BeCentad
RanwuB
thrauQh
manholB
iMIhQU entry
• —-Jcovefaoe
a Shetf qfltonaiichadlocairthrt^jH^^
noncorrosltfBhamDwre.
jwrtne fiwdaflhanalaiB, gel aaw
Figurea
nwrtatooaphwhydrocai^ Boom is
nwunfrighttdware.
under
APPENDIX C
Calculations for On-Site Water Quality Treatment Flow Requirements
And
Treatment Capacity of Inlet Filter Insert
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
RICK
ENGINEERING
COMPANY 2^/7 /or
5620 Friars Road • San Diego, California 92110-2596 • (619) 291-3588 • www.rickengineering.com
mm
0=3.^ ^-Z-.U V>*o,5' C^nO ^ZTT ^ U>.%%' L" ^j^c ^ S-IH
APPENDIX D
Approximate Costs for Treatment Control BMPs
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
Bob Baker VW/Subaru Extension Proiect
Anticipated Maintenance Cost
Unit Type* instaiiation Costs IVIaintenance Cost*"
The California Curb Shelf Basket
Water Cleansing System High $890,00 $600.00
Capacity Curb Inlet Basket
'Maintenance cost is a yearly total based on a quarterly maintenance schedule (4-times per year)
APPENDIX E
Location Map for Bob Baker VW/Subaru Project in Hydrologic Basin 904.40
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05
.Vis • "-
PCEANSIDE
I?
Scuth Oceanside
CarisbacT,
St Beach
O
•-enter.
. iiL^i/.Y IVn'r-lo, i Wolltard ^
Pontol
SoOth Carlsbad Sep
,«ster.
ftve^isf FIATS
. 11 L^Ir MOUNUIN
•J IpAN PA^UAL
• IR / (;c
£OOS--i.»-..-^% ^'-U -
'owwhouse /-iJ ^ \ I f. A
o I •
^ I
"V
\
\
Leacadia\
StSeach
.MoonHghe
Stiite Btachl
San Alejj
St Beach „
0»ticNff.b)i-the-Se«^
Carditt'
Patfogfyirjsojp^
' J) O^^'
St Beach \
Solana Beachv
-J ^^^^
^RcAeTV""-ri^K 1 ; ^\.WaterTafit^^^^iT,
vetwy^ V \r\''
D, ^
Cem
Pasqual
MOUNTAIN ^1
.WT „
> Jo/la Vaf/e)
'^Vfifery
l[arnDna_
1393
WOoijSON MOtiNlail iLoikout tower s
JtackT
Del MarV
Cem
,,,1 CAfcMfl
WOUNMfN
AOC MTNJ
(67) :?696
Tower
Wal
z' <
LLI
I
I
I
II
1
1
1
Location Map For Bob Baker VW/Subaru Project in Hydrologic Basin 904.40
MAP POCKET
Site Plan for Bob Baker VW/Subaru
Prepared By: DCB:FL:nd/Report/14140.003
Rick Engineering Company - Water Resources Division 05-24-02
Revised: 3-31-05