HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 02-25; NORTHPARK AT LA COSTA; HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS; 2004-01-06 (2)HYDROLOGY/HYDRAVUC ANALYSES
FOE
Carlsbad Tract No. 02-25
North Park atLa Costa
Dated: 09/19m
Revised 01/06/04
Snlgmm-DsiB
8348 Center Drive, Suite G
La Afesa, CA 91942-2910
(619) 697-9234, Fax (619) 460-2033
Job No. CA1133
cr o2~z^
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY TM ''''8^3/2002
SUMMARY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP 14 LOTS TO INCLUDE 12 LOTS WITH
DWELLING UNITS AND 2 COMMON LOTS FOR ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND
LANDSCAPE COMMON AREA ONTO TWO (2) VACANT LOTS. LOT 227 AND 228 OF
SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 7457.
CURRENT SUE CONDITIONS:
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON AN ELEVATED PAD WITH THE
TOPOGRAPHY SLOPING AWAY IN ALL DIRECTIONS. IT IS BOUND TO THE EAST
AND THE SOUTH BY LA COSTA AVENUE AND LEVANTE STREET RESPECTIVELY;
TO THE WESL IT IS BOUND BY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SINGLE-
FAMILY iREslDEflAL TO THE NORTH. THE RUNOFF FROM THE PROPERTY
SHEET-FbDWS'~SOUTHERLY DISCHARGING INTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
LEVANTE STREET. NO OFF-SITE RUNOFF DISCHARGES ONTO THE SUBJECT
SITE.
EXISTING RUNOFF:
THE SUBJECT SITE HAS PREVIOUSLY GRADED INTO 2 PADS AND FLOWS FROM
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
SITE WHICH IS THE LOW POINT THE RUNOFF FROM THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE
CURRENT CONDITION IS 4.04 CFS IN THE 100-YEAR, 6-HOUR STORM.
POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF:
THE POST-DEVELOPED SITE DIVIDES THE SITE INTO 2 DRAINAGE BASINS,
NORTHERLY BASIN AND SOUTHERLY BASIN, 0.92 ACRES AND 0.55 ACRES,
RESPECTIVELY. THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE
PROPOSED LOTS 1 TO 7, 14 AND PORTION OF LOT 13 OF THE PROPOSED
TENTATIVE MAP SURFACE DRAINAGE FROM THE NORTHERLY BASIN SHEET
FLOWS TO A DETENTION BASIN, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE PROJECT SITE THEN DISCHARGING TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF-WAY LEVANTE STREET BY A CURB OUTLET THE SOUTHEASTERLY HALF
OF THE SITE INCLUDES LOTS 8 TO 12 AND PORTION OF LOT 13 OF THE
PROPOSED TENTATIVE MAP. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHEET FLOWS TO PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY, LEVANTE STREET.
THE ATTACHED DETENTION BASIN DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT THE
POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DISCHARGE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PRE-
DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DISCHARGE IN THE 100-YEAR, 6-HOUR STORM.
Prepared By: Drainage-Summary.doc
Snipes-Dye Associates i
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAVUC ANALYSIS
FOR
Carlsbad Tract No. 02^
North Park at La Costa
834Bi.Centerbfive. Suite 6
La M^a, CA 91942-2910
(d[19) 697-^^, Fax (619) 460-2033
William A. Snipes R. C. E. 50477
..if /
1-
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAVUC ANALYSIS
FOR
or
Carlsbad Tract No. OA
North Park at La Costa
Dated: 09/19/03
8348 Center Drive, Suite G
La Mesa, CA 91942-2910
(619) 697-9234, Fax (619) 460-2033
Job No. CA1132
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAVUC ANALYSIS
FOR
Carlsbad Tract No. 02-25
North Park at La Costa
: Center £»]p/e, SuUe 6
)1942-2910
, (61^) 697-92fhfax (619) 460-2q33 /
William A. Snipes R.C.E. 50477
NORTHPARK AT LA COSTA TM File: CA1133
1/6/04
SUMMARY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP 14 LOTS TO INCLUDE 12 LOTS WITH
DWELLING UNITS AND 2 COMMON LOTS FOR ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND
LANDSCAPE COMMON AREA ONTO TWO (2) VACANT LOTS, LOT 227 AND 228 OF
SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 7457.
CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS:
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON AN ELEVATED PAD WITH THE
TOPOGRAPHY SLOPING AWAY IN ALL DIRECTIONS. IT IS BOUND TO THE EAST
AND THE SOUTH BY LA COSTA AVENUE AND LEVANTE STREET, RESPECTIVELY;
TO THE WEST IT IS BOUND BY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH. THE RUNOFF FROM THE PROPERTY
SHEET-FLOWS SOUTHERLY DISCHARGING INTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
LEVANTE STREET. NO OFF-SITE RUNOFF DISCHARGES ONTO THE SUBJECT
SITE.
EXISTING RUNOFF:
THE SUBJECT SITE HAS PREVIOUSLY GRADED INTO 2 PADS AND FLOWS FROM
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
SITE, WHICH IS THE LOW POINT. THE RUNOFF FROM THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE
CURRENT CONDITION IS 4.04 CFS IN THE 100-YEAR, 6-HOUR STORM.
POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF:
THE POST-DEVELOPED SITE DIVIDES THE SITE INTO 2 DRAINAGE BASINS,
NORTHERLY BASIN AND SOUTHERLY BASIN, 0.92 ACRES AND 0.55 ACRES,
RESPECTIVELY. THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE
PROPOSED LOTS 1 TO 7, 14 AND PORTION OF LOT 13 OF THE PROPOSED
TENTATIVE MAP. SURFACE DRAINAGE FROM THE NORTHERLY BASIN SHEET
FLOWS TO A DETENTION BASIN, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE PROJECT SITE THEN DISCHARGING TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF-WAY, LEVANTE STREET, BY A CURB OUTLET. THE SOUTHEASTERLY HALF
OF THE SITE INCLUDES LOTS 8 TO 12 AND PORTION OF LOT 13 OF THE
PROPOSED TENTATIVE MAP. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHEET FLOWS TO PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY, LEVANTE STREET
THE ATTACHED DETENTION BASIN DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT THE
POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DISCHARGE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PRE-
DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DISCHARGE IN THE 100-YEAR, 6-HOUR STORM.
Prepared By: Drainage-Summary.doc
Snipes-Dye Associates i
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY TM ''''%?9/2003
S/7-E PEAK FLOW DETENTION (lOO-YEAR)
DETERMINE VOLUME OF INCREASED RUNOFF FROM THE DEVELOPED SITE IN THE 6-HOUR. 100-YEAR
STORM:
1. DETERMINE WEIGHTED SITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT FOR CURRENT SITE
2. DETERMINE WEIGHTED SITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT FOR DEVELOPED SITE
3. DETERMINE PEAK RUNOFF FROM THE CURRENT SITE AND THE DEVELOPED
SITE IN THE 6-HOUR, 100-YEAR STORM.
4. PREPARE SITE HYDROGRAPH FOR THE DEVELOPED SITE
5. DETERMINE VOLUME FOR INCREASED RUNOFF FROM THE DEVELOPED SITE
6. DETERMINE RETENTION BASIN WITH INCREASED RUNOFF VOLUME:
1. CALCULATE WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT Kl FOR THE CURRENT SUE:
I \= 1.37 ACRES (A1 = 1.37 ACRES, ASSUME Cl = 0.55;
1= 0.18 ACRES (A2 = 0.18 ACRES. ASSUME C2 = 0.70)
A=A1 +A2
C = {A1(C1)+A2(C2)}/A
C = (1.37(0.55) + 0.18(0.70)} 1.54
C = 0.57
2. CALCULATE WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT fCI FOR THE DEVELOPED SITE:
I 1= 0.58 ACRES (A3 = 0.58 ACRES ASSUME C3 = 0.40)
1= 0.06 ACRES (A4 = 0.06 ACRES, ASSUME 04 = 070)
\^^= 0.91 ACRES (A5 = 0.91 ACRES, ASSUME C5 = 095;
A=A3+A4 + A5
C = {A3fC3; + A4(C4) + A5fC5;;/A
C = (0.58(0.40) + 0.06(0.70) + 0.91(0.95)} 1.54
0 = 0.74
Prepared by: 100-YR Calculations
Snipes-Dye Associates
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY TM 9/?9/2003
3. CALCULATE PEAK DISCHARGE OF CURRENT SITE:
ASSUME Tc = 10 MINUTES FOR CURRENT AND DEVELOPED SITE
UTILIZE FIGURE 3-1 INTENSITY/DURATION CURVE
AND ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 6-HOUR PRECIPITATION
READ INTENSITY (I) = 4.6 INCH/HOUR
Q = CIA
C = 0.57,1 = 4.6 in/hr, A = 1.54 acres
Q = 0.57(4.6)1.54
Q = 4.04 cfs
4. CALCULATE PEAK DISCHARGE OF DEVELOPED SITE:
Q = CIA
0 = 0.74,1 = 4.6in/hr, A = 1.54acres
0 = 0.74(4.6)1.54
Q= 5.24 cfs
Prepared by: 100-YR Calculations Snipes-Dye Associates ^
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY TM File: CA1131
9/19/2003
S. CALCULATE VOLUME OF INCREASED RUNOFF FROM DEVELOPED SITE:
DEVELOPED SITE HYDROGRAPH
Q(cfs) x=1.15
M
5.24
4.04
Tc (MINUTES)
AREA UNDER SHADED AREA = VOLUME OF DISCHARGE FROM DEVELOPED SITE
VOLUME = 1.15(1.20)(60) = 82.80 CU. FT (MIN. VOLUME OF STORMWATER TO RETAIN)
TOTAL PREDEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE FROM SITE (Qex):
Qex =4.04 cfs
TOTAL POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE FROM SITE (Qpr):
Qpr = 5.24 cfs
THE POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF THROUGH RETENTION BASIN (Qm):
Qm= 2.91 efs (See attached calcinations)
THE POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF NOT THROUGH RETENTION BASIN (Qnr):
Qnr = Qpr-Qin= 5.24 cfs - 2.91 cfe
Qnr = 2.33 cfs
^ THE MAX. ALLOWABLE POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE RUNOFF PRIOR TO RETAIN (Q r):
Qr = Qex - Qnr = 4.04 cfe - 2.33 ck
Qr = 1.71 cfs
Utilize 2-4 inch PVC pipes for ffie proposed retention basin outlet:
4" pipe's discharge capacity = 0.84 cfe (See attached calculations)
2-4" pipes = 2x0.84= 1.68 cfs <Qr
THE TOTAL POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF = Qnr+Q(two 4" pipes) = 2.33 cfe + f.6« cfe = 4.0f cfe
4.0f cfs (the total post-development runoff) is less than 4.04 cfs (the total pre-development runoff)
Prepared by:
Snipes-Dye Associates 100-YR Calculations
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY TM
6. DESIGN RETENTION STRUCTURE WITH MINIMUM VOLUME OF 82 CUBIC FEET:
attached deUO)
File: CA1131
9/19/2003
fSee
RETENTION VOLUME (V) = CROSS-SECTION BASIN AREA (A) X WIDTH OF BASIN (W)
A = 1/2 X WATER LEVEL HEIGHT (H) X LENGTH OF WATER SURFACE (L)
6" OVERFLOW
PIPE
RETENTION BASIN DIMENSIONS:
W = 4.17 FEET
H = 0.67 FEET
H/L = 1/100
L = 100(H) = 67 FEET
V=A(W) = 1^^H)(W}
V=(67 FT)(0.67 FT)(4.17 FT)/2
V= 94CU. FT. > 82 CU. FT.
DETERMINE THE OVERFLOW PIPE:
Utilize one 6"pipe Ibr the retention liasin overflow pipe
6" overflow pipe's tOscharge capacity = 2.55 cfs (See attadied cafcufatfons;
Q(enter) - Q (two 4" pipes) = Q(mln. overflow pipe)
2.91 cfe - 1.68 cfs = 1.23 cfs < 2.55 cfs
(The capacity ofa 6" overtteivpfpe is greater titan the reqimed runoff discharge.)
CONCLUSION:
THE TWO 4" PVC PIPE OUTLET AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LOW-END
OF THE PROPOSED RETENTION BASIN AND ONE 6" PVC
OVERFLOW PIPE. WHICH HAS AN INVERT ELEVATION AT «"
480VE THE BOTTOM OF THE LOW-END ARE SUFFiaENT TO
RETAIN THE REQUIRED VOLUME OF STORM WATER AND DRAIN
THE DEVELOPED SITE DURING A PEAK FLOW. 100-YEAR STORM
EVENT.
Prepared by:
Snipes-Dye Associates 100-YR Calculations
6" PVC
OVERFLOW
PIPE ^
PVC PIPES
DISCHARGE
TO CURB OUTLET
Q, 1.68 CFS
-RETeslTION VOLUME (V) - I05 CU. FT
-RETAINING WALL
PB? GRADING PLAN (TYP.)
SECTION A-A
NO SCALE
• DRAINAGE PIPES DISCHARGE
TO CURB OUTLET PB5
IMPROVEMENT PLANS (TYPJ O RETAINING WALL
PB2 GRADING PLAN CnrP.)
4' PVC PIPE
K
d
gSSi fSiS^, IMS iMisSi
70'
PLAN VIEW - RETENTION BASIN DETAIL
NO SCALE
HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE
(C) Copyright 1982-99 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 8.0 Release Date: 01/01/99 License ID 1305
Analysis prepared by:
Snipes-Dye Associates
8348 Center Drive, Suite G
La Mesa, CA 91942-2910
Fax (619)460-2033 Phone (619)697-9234
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 11:52 8/ 7/2002
DISCHARGE CAPACITY OFA 4" PIPE
»»PIPEFLOW HYDRAULIC INPUT INFORMATION««
PIPE DIAMETER(FEET) = 0.330
FLOWDEPTH(FEET) = 0.330
PIPE SLOPE(FEET/FEET) = 0.4900
MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = 0.020000
»»> NORMAL DEPTH FLOW (CFS) = 0.84
HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE
(C) Copyright 1982-99 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 8.0 Release Date: 01/01/99 License ID 1305
Analysis prepared by:
Snipes-Dye Associates
8348 Center Drive, Suite G
La Mesa, CA 91942-2910
Fax (619)460-2033 Phone (619)697-9234
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 8:11 8/ 8/2002
DISCHARGE CAPACITY FO A 6" PIPE
^f^,^,^,^,^,^r**************•k**•k* ****************************************
»»PIPEFLOW HYDRAULIC INPUT INFORMATION««
PIPE DIAMETER(FEET) = 0.500
FLOWDEPTH(FEET) = 0.500
PIPE SLOPE(FEET/FEET) = 0.4900
MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = 0.020000
»»> NORMAL DEPTH FLOW(CFS) = 2.55
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY ^'^ntnm
RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE
Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL
(c) Copyright 1982-99 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 1.5A Release Date: 01/01/99 License ID 1305
Analysis prepared by:
Snipes-Dye Associates
8348 Center Drive, Suite G
La Mesa, CA 91942-2910
Fax (619)460-2033 Phone (619)697-9234
LEVANTE STREET TENTATIVE MAP
POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY
FILE NAME: CA1131.DAT
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 14:49 8/27/2002
USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION:
1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA
USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00
6-HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 2.700
SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 3.00
SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE =0.95
SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C"-VALUES USED
NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21
»»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««<
*USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA):
MULTI-UNITS DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7400
INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH = 495.00
UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 295.45
DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 284.33
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.12
URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 11.008
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 4.276
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.91
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.92 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.91
Post-Dev.doc
TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITY File: CA1131
9/19/2003
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 4
»»>COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««<
>»»USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE««<
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.9 INCHES
PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 21.5
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 287.00
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 279.60
FLOWLENGTH(FEET) = 15.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 2.91
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.01 TC(MIN.) = 11.02
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 21
»»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««<
*USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA):
MULTI-UNITS DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7400
INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH = 200.00
UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 294.00
DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 286.78
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 7.22
URBAN SUBAREA O'VERLAND TIME OF FLOW (MINUTES) = 5.974
*CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH
DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED.
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 6-MINUTES
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 6.325
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.17
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.17
***********************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 21
»»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««<
-•^USER SPECIFIED (SUBAREA) :
MULTI-UNITS DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7400
INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH = 100.00
UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 291.00
DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 285.00
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 6.00
URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 3.566
*CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH
DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED.
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 6-MINUTES
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 6.325
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.40
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.30 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.40
END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS
Post-Dev.doc
40 50 1
Duration
2 3 4 5
Hours
Directions for Application:
(1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounis
for the selected frequency. These maps are included in Ihe
County Hydrology Manual (10, 50, and 100 yr maps included
in the Design and Procedure Manual).
(2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within
the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitalion (not
applicaple to Desert).
(3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart.
(4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines.
(5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for Ihe localion
being analyzed.
24
Application Form:
(a) Selected frequency \P_0__ year
(b) PQ = 2^1_ in., P24 = ,p
(c) Adjusted Pg(2) = _2._!jf- in.
(d) tj^ = _i 0 min.
(e) I = in./hr.
Note: This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency
curves used since 1965.
P6
Duration
'5:
7
10
15
20
" 25
30
40
50
60
90
120
_^150
iiU)
240
300
360
3.95
3.18
2.53
1 95
1.62
1.40
1.24
1 03
0.90
0.80
0.61
0.51
6^44:
6.39
0.33
0.19 aaa
263
2.12
I'ei'
1 30
1.08
0.93
0;83
0.69
0.60
6.53
6A\
0.34
0.29
6.26
'6.'22'
2.5
1
3.5
1
4.5
I
5.5
I
527
4.24
3 37
2.59
2.15
1.87
1.66
1 38
1.19
1.06
0.82
0.68
0.59
0.52
0.43
038
0.33
6 59
5.36
•4.21'
324
2.69
2.33
2.07
1.72
1.49
1.33
1.02
085
0.73
0.65
0.54
047
042
7.90
6 36
5.05
3.89
323
2.80
2.49
2.07
1 79
1.59
1.23
1.02
088
0.78
0.65
6.56
922
7.42
5'90
4.54
3 77
327
2.90
2.41
2 09
1.66
1.43
1.19
1.03
0.91
0.76
6.66
0.50! 0.58
1054
8 48
6.74
5.19
4.31
3 73
3.32
2.76
2 39
2 12
1.63
1 36
1 18
1.04
0,87
0.75
067
11.86
i 9.54
; 7 58 •
' 5.84 '
' 4.85 '
; 4.20
! 3.73
! 3.10 '
i 2.69 '
j 2.39 '
I 1.84 '
i 1.53 '
j 1.32
, 1.18
10.98;
I 0.85 I
! 075 I
13 17
10 60'
8 42 •
6 49 '
5.39 •
4.67 i
4,15 '
3 45
2 ,98 '
2 65 '
2.04 i
1 70 i
1.47 ;
1 31 •
1.08 1
0.94 I
0.84 i
14 49 1581
11,66j 12,72
9,27 \ 10,11
7.13 ! 7,78
5,93 \ 6,46
5 13 ;
4 ,56 '
3 79
3 28 '
2,92 '
2,25
1 87
1 62 •
1 44
1.19 '
t03 i
0 92 i
560
4 98
4 13
3 58
3 18
2,45
204
1 76
1,57
1.30
1 13
1 00
Intensity-Duration Design Chart - Template
HazMal/Counly. , ogeology Manual/lnl_Dur Design Chart.FHB
3-1
FIGUR E
C|^Y OF SAN DIEGO
DWRTHEHT OF SANITATION £.
FLOOD CONTROL lOO-YEArS-HOUR PflECIPITATlOij
45'
ISOPLUVIALS
PnECiPITATIOn lil
30'
15'
33'
i,5i
OF 100-YEAR 6-IIOUR
j'EnTiis or AM i;:cii
Prepn
U.S. DEPARTMEN
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT.'
SPECIAL STUDIES URA.NCII, OFFICE OF II
30' _
.'d by
r OF COMMER
OSPIIEKIC AOmiH
UROLOGY. NATK
CE
ISTRATION
3NAL WEATHER S ERVICE
118'
C(|^Y OF SAN DIEGO
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION S-
FLOOD CONTROL
'i5
33'
30'
15
ii5'
U.S. DEPARTMEN
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT:.
SPECIAI. STUDIES UKA.NCII. OFI ICE Of 11
30'
100-YEAR%-IIOl|R PRECIPITATIOM
--2Q-^ISGPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-liOUR
PRECIPITATION IN
SAfI Cl
ENTHS OF AN INCH
J by
r OF COMMERCE
OSPIIEKIC AD.MINISTRATION
UI.'OLOGY, NATIONAL HEATHER SEKVICE
l-l I 111" 30' 17' V;i :in' ir. I