HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 05-19; CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE; TRAFFIC STUDY; 2005-07-11LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
City of Carlsbad, Califomia
July 11,2005
Prepared for:
Goldentop Development I, LLC
9225 Dowdy Drive, Suite 106
San Diego, Califomia 92126
LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
Prepared by: Under the Supervision of: Linscott Law &
Norene Pen, PE John Boarman, PE Greenspan, Engineers
Transportation Engineerin Principle 4542 Ruffner street
Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92111
858.300.8800 T
858.300.8810 F
www.llgengireers.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Project Description 2
2.1 Project Location 2
2.2 Project Description 2
3.0 Existing Conditions 3
3.1 Existing Street Network 3
3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes 3
4.0 Analysis Approach and Methodology 5
4.1 Intersections 5
4.2 Sti-eet Segments 5
5.0 Significance Criteria 6
6.0 Analysis of Existing Conditions 7
6.1 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service 7
6.2 Segment Levels of Service 7
7.0 Cumulative Projects 10
7.1 Description of Proj ects 10
7.2 Simmiary of Cumulative Projects Trips 10
8.0 Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment 11
8.1 Trip Generation 11
8.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment 11
9.0 Analysis of Future Scenarios 12
9.1 Existing -f Project 12
9.1.1 Intersection Analysis 12
9.1.2 Segment Operations 12
9.2 Existing + Proj ect -f Cumulative Proj ects 12
9.2.1 Intersection Analysis 12
9.2.2 Segment Operations 12
9.3 Year 2030 Segment Analysis 12
9.3.1 Year 2030 Traffic Volumes 12
10.0 Congestion Management Program Compliance 16
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, eng/neere , LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
i Carlsbad Medical Village
N.\155<)\Rroort\l S59jp.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T)
SECTION PAGE
11.0 Vehicular and Pedestrian Access 17
11.1 Vehicular Access 17
11.2 Pedestrian Assessment 17
12.0 Significance of Impacts and Mitigation Measures 18
12.1 Significance of Impacts 18
12.1.1 Direct Impacts 18
12.1.2 Cumulative Impacts 18
12.2 Mitigation Measure 18
APPENDICES
APPENDIX
A. Intersection Count Sheets
B. Cumulative Project Assignment Worksheets
C. Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets
D. SANTEC/ITE Roadway Classificafion Table & 2030 SANDAG Traffic Volumes
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:M55!)\Rsport\1559_rpt.doc
LIST OF FIGURES
SECTION—FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE
1-1 Vicinity Map 1
1-2 Project Area Map 1
2- 1 Site Plan 2
3- 1 Existing Conditions Diagram 4
3-2 Existing Traffic Volumes 4
7- 1 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes 10
8- 1 Project TraflBc Distiibution 11
8-2 Project Traffic Volumes 11
9- 1 Existing + Project Traffic Volumes 12
9-2 Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes 12
LIST OF TABLES
SECTION—TABLE # PAGE
Table 3-1 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 4
Table 6-1 Intersection Operations 8
Table 6-2 Peak Hour Street Segment Operations 9
Table 7-1 Project Trip Generation 11
Table 9-1 Intersection Operations 13
Table 9-2 Peak Hour Street Segment Operations 14
Table 9-3 Year 2030 Segment Analysis 15
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers ... LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
111 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l 55<>\RepoifM 559_rpt.doc
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
City of Carlsbad, California
July 11,2005
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers (LLG) has been retained to prepare a traffic study for the
Carlsbad Medical Village project in the City of Carlsbad. The development will consist of
approximately 23,420 square feet (sf) medical office space.
The site is located on the south side of Carlsbad Village Drive, west of Highland Drive. Figure 1-1
shows the project vicinity and Figure 1-2 illustrates, in more detail, the site location.
The traffic analysis presented in this report includes the following:
• Project description
• Existing conditions assessment
• Project traffic generation/distribution/assignment
• Near-term cumulative projects
• Near-term intersection/street segment capacity analysis
• Vehicular and pedestrian access
• Significance of Impacts and Mitigation Measures
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
NAISWNRepoif.l 559_tpt.dcic
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNIY
WARNER
SPRINGS
SOURCE: LLG Engineers, 2005
LiG1559 OGI-LDWG MILES
LINSCOTT
LAW a
GREENSPAN
Figure 1-1
VICINITY MAP
engineers
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
Source: Thomas Guide, 2005
LLG1559 F1G1-2.DWG
9^ 'vwm .5%
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 1-2
PROJECT AREA MAP
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Project Location
The location of the project is west of Highland Drive and south of Carlsbad Village Drive on two
parcels of vacant land. The site is undeveloped and there is currently a library on the north side of
Carlsbad Village Drive opposite the proposed site.
Based on the anticipated distribution of the project ti-affic, the specific study area includes the
following intersections and street segments:
Signalized Intersections
• Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Southbound Ramps
• Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Northbound Ramps
• Carlsbad Village Drive / Pio Pico Drive
• Carlsbad Village Drive / Highland Drive
Street Segments
• Carlsbad Village Drive: 1-5 NB Ramps to 1-5 SB Ramps
• Carlsbad Village Drive: 1-5 SB Ramps to Pio Pico Drive
• Carlsbad Village Drive: Pio Pico Drive to Highland Drive
• Carlsbad Village Drive: East of Highland Drive
2.2 Project Description
The project consists of developing approximately 23,420 square feet of medical office space divided
among five buildings. The project will have a minimum on-site parking totaling 118 spaces. The
site access is proposed via one driveway on Carlsbad Village Drive approximately 325 feet west of
Highland Drive. Figure 2-1 depicts the conceptual site plan.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
2 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\155<>\Reporf\! 559_rpt.doc
Source: Leery Childs Moscari Warner Architects, 2005
LLG1S59 nG2-1.DW6 NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
Figure 2-1
srre PLAN
engineers
GARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAQE
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Existing Street Network
The following provides a brief description of the street system in the project area. Figure 3-1
illustrates the existing conditions in this area.
Interstate 5 (1-5) is a north/south fi-eeway that extends firom the Mexican border north through
Cahfomia. In the vicinity ofthe project, eight lanes of divided travel are provided. For the purpose
of this report, the interchange of interest is at Carlsbad Village Drive.
Carlsbad Village Drive is classified as a IS^ajor Arterial west of the 1-5 northbound ramps and as a
Mixior Arterial east of the 1-5 northbound ramps. Carlsbad Village Drive is currently constructed as
a four-lane roadway and curbside parking is generally provided. The posted speed limit varies in the
vicinity of the site. The speed limit is 25 mph west of Pio Pico Drive, 35 mph firom Pio Pico Drive
to Highland Drive, and 40 mph east of Highland Drive. Bus stops are provided at regular intervals
and there are sidewalks on both the north and south side of Carlsbad Village Drive in the vicinity of
the site.
Highland Drive is currently an unclassified roadway. Highland Drive is currently constinicted as a
two-lane undivided roadway, with curbside parking generally not provided. The posted speed limit
is 25 mph. There are no bike lanes or bus stops in the project area. Sidewalks are provided on either
side of Highland Drive north of Carlsbad Village Drive.
Pio Pico Drive is currently an unclassified roadway. Pio Pico Drive is currently constructed as a
two-lane undivided roadway, with curbside parking generally provided. The posted speed limit is 25
mph. There are no bike lanes but bus stops are provided within the project area.
3.2 Existing Trafflc Volumes
Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were collected at key area intersections to capture
peak commuter activity. The AM and PM peak hour manual tuming movement counts were
conducted in June 2005 and can been found on Figure 3-2. Appendix A contains copies of the
intersection count sheets.
Table 3-1 is a summary ofthe most recent available average daily ti-affic volumes (ADTs) fi-om the
City of Carlsbad Engineering Department.
LINSCOTT, UW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
3 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l 559\Rq)Oit\t 559_rpt.dcjc
TABLE 3-1
EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Street Segment Date of
Count
ADT ^ (EBAVB)
Carlsbad Village Drive
1-5 Southbound Ramps to 1-5 Northbound
Ramps Sept. 2003 12,829 /13,226
1-5 Northbound Ranps to Pio Pico Drive Sept. 2003 9,957/ 11,048
Pio Pico Drive to Highland Drive May 2004 8,181/8,799
East of Highland Drive Oct. 2003 7,608 / 8,585
Footnotes:
a. Average Daily Traffic Volumes.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\I 550\ReportM 559_rps.doc
REV. 7/7/05
UJS1S59 FIG3-1.DWG
- Traffic Signal
NP - No Parking
BL — Bike Lane
BS - Bus stop
TWLTL- Two-way left tum lane
2U - Two lane undivided roadway
4U - Four lane undivided roadway
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 3-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM
GARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
REV. 7/7/05
LLG1559 nG3-2.DWG
- AM/PM peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 3-2
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM/PM PEAK HOURS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
4.0 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
Level of service (LOS) is the term used to denote the different operating conditions which occur on a
given roadway segment under various traffic volume loads. It is a qualitative measure used to
describe a quantitative analysis taking into account factors such as roadway geometries, signal
phasing, speed, travel delay, fi-eedom to maneuver, and safety. Level of service provides an index to
the operational qualities of a roadway segment or an intersection. Level of service designations
range firom A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing
the worst operating conditions. Level of service designation is reported differently for signalized and
unsignalized intersections, as well as for roadway segments.
4.1 Intersections
The signalized intersections were analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method.
The ICU procedure is based on an article in the Institute ofTransportation Engineers Joumal, August
1978 and assumes the traffic flow characteristics of signahzed intersections. It computes the Level
of Service (LOS) for the total intersection based upon a summation of volume to capacity (V/C)
ratios for the key conflicting movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent of signal
green time, and thus, the capacity required to serve the traffic demand. The LOS for signalized
intersections varies fi-om A (fi-ee flow, little delay) to F ("jammed" conditions). Appendix C
consists of the ICU intersection calculation sheets. Table 9-1 shows a summary of the existing,
existing + project, and existing + project + cumulative projects intersection operations.
4.2 Street Segments
The key street segments in the project area were analyzed on a peak hour basis. The greatest amount
of peak hour tuming volumes (generally the PM peak) at an upstream or downstream intersection
comprises the volumes utilized in the analysis. A volume to capacity ratio (V/C) is calculated for
each direction of the street segment during the peak hour. The City of Carlsbad assumes a one-
direction capacity of 2,000 vehicles per lane per hour. A LOS is determined by using V/C
thresholds. Table 9-2 shows a summary of the existing, existing + project, and existing + project +
cumulative projects street segment operations.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
5 Carlsbad Medical Village
N.\l 559\Repoif,! 559_rpt.doc
5.0 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
A traffic impact is considered to be significant if the addition ofproject traffic causes the intersection
level of service (LOS) to decrease to a LOS lower than D during the peak hour, as outlined in the
City of Carlsbad's Growth Management Plan. For intersections or sti-eet segments which are
currentlv operating worse than LOS D, a project impact will be considered significant if the project
causes the ICU value at an intersection to increase by greater than 0.02 or the volume-to-capacity
ratio at a segment to increase by greater than 0.02.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, eng/neere LLG Ref. 3-05-1559
6 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\1559\Report\i559_rpt.dac
6.0 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
6.1 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service
Table 6-1 shows that the four signalized intersections in the project area are calculated to operate
currently at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours.
6.2 Segment Levels of Service
Table 6-2 shows that the all the street segments in the project area are calculated to operate currently
at LOS A on a peak hour basis. The table also indicates which peak hour and direction was used to
determine the LOS.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
7 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l 559\RsportM 559_rpt.doc
TABLE 6-1
INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
Street Segment Peak Hour
Existing
Street Segment Peak Hour
ICU LOS
AM 0.50 A
Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Southbound Ramps
PM 0.73 C
AM 0.54 A
Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Northboimd Ramps 0.72 Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Northboimd Ramps
PM 0.72 C
AM 0.46 A
Carlsbad Village Drive / Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive / Pio Pico Drive
PM 0.49 A
AM 0.38 A
Carlsbad Village Drive / Highland Drive
0.35
Carlsbad Village Drive / Highland Drive
PM 0.35 A
Notes:
ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization
LOS = Level of Service
LOS THRESHOLDS
ICU
0.0 to 0.60
0.61 to 0.70
0.71 to 0.80
0.81 to 0.90
0.91 to 1.00
> 1.00
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
LiNSCcn, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\1559\RsportM 559_rpt.doc
TABLE 6-2
PEAK HOUR STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS
street Segment
No. of
Lanes Per
Direction
Peak Hour/ Existing
street Segment
No. of
Lanes Per
Direction Direction Vol V/C LOS
Carlsbad Village Drive
1-5 SB Ramps to 1-5 NB Ramps 2 PM/EB 1274 0.32 A
1-5 NB Ramps to Pio Pico Drive 2 PM/EB 952 0.24 A
Pio Pico Drive to Highland Drive 2 AM/WB 791 0.20 A
East of Highland Drive 2 AM/WB 806 0.20 A
Source: Volumes are derived from the peak hour volumes shown on Figure 3-2.
Notes:
EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound
V / C = volume to capacity ratio.
C = Capacity (major arterial -^2 000 vehicles per through lane per hour).
LOS THRESHOLDS
V/C
0.0 to 0.60
0.61 to 0.70
0.71 to 0.80
0.81 to 0.90
0.91 to 1.00
> 1.00
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N.\1559\Rq)oit\I 559_rpt.doc
7.0 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
7.1 Description of Projects
Based on a review of the Major Development Activity Map and the Carlsbad Tracts 1990 - Present
listing at the City of Carlsbad and discussions with City staff, six projects were considered to
potentially add cumulative traffic to the project-generated traffic.
1. ) Magnolia Subdivision consists of 11 single-family dwelling units located at Magnolia Avenue
and Adams Street. The project is estimated to generate 110 average daily traffic volumes.
2. ) The Village bv the Sea property is a mixed-use development consisting of 65 condominiums and
8,662 square feet retail space. Access to the property will be along Christianson Way east of
Carlsbad Boulevard. The condominium is estimated to generate 520 average daily traffic
volumes and the retail land use is estimated to generate 10,394 average daily traffic volumes.
3. ) Laguna Point property consists of 21 condominium units located at 539 Laguna Drive north of
Carlsbad Village Drive. The condominium is estimated to generate 168 average daily traffic
volumes.
4. ) 1265 Carlsbad Village Drive development is an 8,981 square feet professional office located at
1265 Carlsbad Village Drive, east of Highland Drive.
5. ) Casa Montessori De Vista School located on the eastem side of Highland Drive and south of
CM-lsbad Village Drive. According to the traffic study conducted by Damell & Associates (April
2002), the project contributes 202 ADT. The AM Peak Hour inbound and outbound volumes are
51 and 46 trips, respectively. The PM Peak Hour inbound and outbound volumes are 45 and 50
trips, respectively. It is our understanding that since this school project has been placed on hold.
6. ) The last project is a mixed development project called the Lincoln and Oak Mixed Use Project.
The development consists of 6 residential town homes and 1,984 square feet of retail use. The
development is located at 3112 Lincoln Street south of Carlsbad Village Drive. The town homes
are estimated to generate 48 average daily traffic volumes and the retail land use is estimated to
generate 2,381 average daily traffic volumes.
7.2 Summary of Cumulative Projects Trips
Figure 7-1 shows the total cumulative projects traffic volumes. The individual traffic assignment
worksheets for the above cumulative projects can be found in Appendix B. The existing + project +
cumulative projects traffic volumes can be found on Figure 9-2.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
10 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l 55<)\Reporl\t 559_rpt.doc
REV. 7/7/05
LLG1559 nG7-1.DWG
- AM/PM peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 7-1
CUMULATIVE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM/PM PEAK HOURS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAQE
8.0 TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT
8.1 Trip Generation
Trip generation for the 24,420 square foot medical office building was calculated based on rates
published in SANDAG Trip Generation Manual, April 2002. The specific land use designation used
for the trip generation is "Medical - Dental Office", as it best fits the description of the project. The
project is calculated to generate approximately 1171 ADT with 56 inbound / 14 outbound trips
during the AM peak hour and 39 inbound / 90 outbound trips during the PM peak hour.
Table 8-1 shows the project traffic generation calculations for the proposed project.
TABLE 7-1
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Use Size
Daily Trip Ends
(ADTs) AM Peak Hour PMPeak Hour
Use Size
Rate* Volume^ %of
ADT
In:Out Volume %of
ADT
In:Out Volume
Use Size
Rate* Volume^ %of
ADT Split In Out
%of
ADT Split In Out
Medical-Dental Office 23,420 SF 50 /KSF 1,171 6% 8:2 56 14 11% 3:7 39 90
Footnotes:
1. Based on the SANDAG Trip Generation Rates publication, April 2002.
2. Traffic volumes expressed in vehicles per day.
8.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment
The project-generated traffic was regionally distributed to the street system based on the site's access
to Carlsbad Village Drive, the roadway system characteristics (i.e. signalized locations, lane
geometiics), the site's proximity to 1-5, and the existing peak hour and daily trafBc volumes. Figure
8-1 shows the estimated project traffic distribution for the vicinity.
The project traffic was assigned to the street system based on the project trip distribution and
calculated trip generation. The traffic assignment for the project is shown on Figure 8-2. The
resultant existing + project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 9-1.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 11 LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\] 559\Report\! 559_rpt.doc
REV. 7/7/05
LLG1S59 nG8-1.DWG
<J^^ - Regional Trip Distribution
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 8-1
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
REV. 7/7/05
UG1559 F1G8-2.DWG
NOTES:
- ADTs are shown midblock
- AM/PM peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 8-2
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM/PM PEAK HOURS & ADTs
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
9.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE SCENARIOS
9.1 Existing + Project
9.1.1 Intersection Analysis
Table 9-1 shows that the four signahzed intersections in the project area are calculated to operate at
LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic. A review of
the analysis also indicates that the ICU level did not increase more than 0.02 for any of the four
locations during both the AM and PM peak hours.
9.1.2 Segment Operations
Table 9-2 shows that the street segments in the project area are calculated to operate at LOS A on a
peak hour basis with the addition of project traffic.
9.2 Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects
9.2.1 Intersection Analysis
A review of Table 9-1 indicates that the four signahzed intersections in the project area are
calculated to operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of
project traffic and cumulative project's traffic.
9.2.2 Segment Operations
Table 9-2 shows that the street segments in the project area are calculated to operate at LOS A on a
peak hour basis with the addition of the project traffic and cumulative project's traffic.
9.3 Year 2030 Segment Analysis
9.3.1 Year 2030 Traffic Volumes
Year 2030 Street segment analysis is based upon the comparison of daily traffic volumes (ADTs) to
the County of San Diego's Roadway Classifications, Level of Service (LOS) and Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) table, contained in the SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies in the San
Dieso Resion. March 2000. This table provides segment capacities for LOS A through LOS E for
various roadway classifications.
Year 2030 Segment volumes were obtained firom the SANDAG website (www.sandag.org). The
results ofthe segment analysis are summarized in Table 9-3. A review of Table 9-3 indicates that all
the segments along Carlsbad Village Drive in the vicinity of the site is calculated to operate at LOS
D or better in the Year 2030. Furthermore, the addition of the project does not change the segment
LOS along Carlsbad Village Drive in Year 2030.
A copy of the classification table and Year 2030 Segment volumes can be found in Appendix D.
LiNSCorr, Uw & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
12 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\lJ59\Rcport\l 559_rpt.doc
REV. 7/7/05
LLG1559 nGg-1.DW6
- AM/PM peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 9-1
EXISTING + PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES
AM/PM PEAK HOURS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAQE
REV. 7/7/05
aG1559 nG9-2.DWG
- AM/PM peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
Figure 9-2
EXISTING + PROJECT + CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFRC VOLUMES
AM/PM PEAK HOURS
CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE
TABLE 9-1
INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
Street Segment Peak
Hour
Existing Existing +
Project
Existing -I- Project
-1- Cumulative
Projects Street Segment Peak
Hour
ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
AM 0.50 A 0.50 A 0.56 A
Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Southbound Ramps
PM 0.73 C 0.73 C 0.82 D
AM 0.54 A 0.55 A 0.59 A
Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Northbound Ramps 0.87 D Carlsbad Village Drive /1-5 Northbound Ramps
PM 0.72 C 0.73 C 0.87 D
AM 0.46 A 0.46 A 0.49 A
Carlsbad Village Drive / Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive / Pio Pico Drive
PM 0.49 A 0.51 A 0.54 A
AM 0.38 A 0.38 A 0.42 A
Carlsbad Village Drive / Highland Drive 0.42 Carlsbad Village Drive / Highland Drive
PM 0.35 A 0.36 A 0.42 A
Notes:
ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization
LOS = Level of Service LOS THRESHOLDS
ICU
0.0 to 0.60
0.61 to 0.70
0.71 to 0.80
0.81 to 0.90
0.91 to 1.00
> 1.00
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 13
LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:M559\R5port\) 559_rpt.doc
TABLE 9-2
PEAK HOUR STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Street Segment
No. of
Lanes Per
Peak
Hour/
Existing Existing -I- Project Existing + Project
-1- Cumulative
Direction Direction Vol v/c LOS Vol v/c LOS Vol V/C LOS
Carlsbad Village Drive
1-5 SB Ramps to 1-5 NB Ramps 2 PM/EB 1274 0.32 A 1287 0.32 A 1449 0.36 A
1-5 NB Ramps to Pio Pico
Drive 2 PM/EB 952 0.24 A 975 0.24 A 1080 0.27 A
Pio Pico Drive to Highland
Drive 2 AM/WB 791 0.20 A 809 0.20 A 899" 0.22 A
East of Highland Drive 2 AM/WB 806 0.20 A 816 0.20 A 893" 0.22 A
Source: Volumes are derived from the peak hour volumes shown on Figures 3-2, 9-1, & 9-2.
Notes:
a. Peak hour / Direction = PM/EB
EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound
V / C = volume to capacity ratio.
C = Capacity (major arterial ->2 000 vehicles per through lane per hour).
LOS THRESHOLDS
V/C
0.0 to 0.60
0.61 to 0.70
0.71 to 0.80
0.81 to 0.90
0.91 to 1.00
> 1.00
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
LiNSCOn, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 14 LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\1550\RcpoitM559_rpt.rioc
TABLE 9-3
YEAR 2030 SEGMENT ANALYSIS
Existing Capacity At
LOSE"
Year 2030 Year 2030 with Project
Street Segment Roadway
Class
Capacity At
LOSE" Volume
b
V/C LOS Volume
b V/C LOS
Carlsbad Village Drive
1-5 SB Ramps to 1-5 NB
Ramps
4 Lane Major
Arterial 40,000 28,000 0.70 C 28,410 0.71 C
1-5 NB Ramps to Pio Pico
Drive
4 Lane Sec.
Arterial 30,000 24,000 0.80 D 24,703 0.82 D
Pio Pico Drive to Highland
Drive
4 Lane Sec.
Arterial 30,000 17,000 0.57 C 17,784 0.59 C
East of Highland Drive 4 Lane Sec.
Arterial 30,000 19,000 0.63 C 19,211 0.64 C
Footnotes:
a. Capacity based on the Roadway Classifications Table in the SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for TrafBc Impact Studies in
the San Diego Region, March 2000.
b. Average Daily Traffic Volumes obtained fi-om the SANDA G website
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 15 LLG Ref 3-05-1559
Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l559\Rcport\l 559_rpt.doc
10.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) was first adopted on November 22, 1991, and is
intended to link directly, land use, transportation and air quality through Level of Service
performance. Local agencies are required by statute to conform to the CMP. The CMP requires an
Enhanced CEQA Review for all large projects that are expected to generate more than 2,400 ADT or
more than 200 peak hour trips.
In 1993, the Institute of Transportation Engineers Cahfomia Border Section and the San Diego
Region Traffic Engineer's Council established a set of guidelines to be used in the preparation of
traffic impact studies that are subject to the Enhanced CEQA review process. These guidelines were
updated in January 2003. This pubhshed document is tified 2002 Congestion Management Program
update. The guidelines require that a project study area be established as follows:
• All streets and intersections on CMP arterials where the project will add 50 or more peak
hour trips in either direction.
• Mainline fireeway locations where the project will add 150 or more peak hour trips in
either direction.
Based upon these guidelines, the project does not generate more than 2,400 ADT nor do the peak
hour trips exceed 50 in either direction. Therefore, the Carlsbad Medical Village site does not
require a CMP analysis of the study area. Intersection and street segment analyses were, however,
undertaken.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
16 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\l 55.0\ReporiM 559_rpt.doc
11.0 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
11.1 Vehicular Access
The Carlsbad Medical Village will have one access to the site via Carlsbad Village Drive. The
access location is approximately 325 feet west of Highland Drive. There is an existing driveway for
a library on the north side of Carlsbad Village Drive approximately 25 feet west of the proposed
Carlsbad Medical Village Driveway. Ideally, the driveways for the library and Carlsbad Medical
Village would be aligned opposite of each other. However, the offset should not have a major affect
on the operation of the intersection for the following reasons:
• The offset will still permit left-tum movement into each site from Carlsbad Village Drive
without creating an overlap ofthe two left-tum movements.
• There will be very little through movements from either driveway location going from
the library to the Carlsbad Medical Village and vise versa.
• The average daily traffic volumes on Carlsbad Village Drive are relatively low and are
not forecasted to increase dramatically in the fiiture.
• The speed limit on Carlsbad Village Drive is 35 mph.
• Sight distance for each driveway is sufficient.
The only traffic operation restriction caused by the offset is that vehicles cannot make left-tums from
the library and Carlsbad Medical Village simultaneously.
There is an existing two-way left-tum striped median along Carlsbad Village Drive at the proposed
site driveway. LLG recommends a painted left-tum bay in the westbound direction.
11.2 Pedestrian Assessment
The closest signahzed intersection to the site is at Carlsbad Village Drive and Highland Drive. This
intersection provides pedestrian push buttons to cross both Carlsbad Village Drive and Highland
Drive. Pedestrian counts were conducted at this location during the AM (7 AM to 9 AM) and PM (4
PM to 6 PM) peak periods. During the AM peak period, a total of 17 pedestrians crossed on the
north side of Carlsbad Village Drive and a total of 10 pedestrians crossed the east side of Highland
Drive. During the PM peak period, a total of 20 pedestrians crossed on the north side of Carlsbad
Village Drive, a total of 10 pedestrians crossed the west side of Highland Drive, and a total of 20
pedestiians crossed the east side of Highland Drive.
There currently are sidewalks on both sides of Carlsbad Village Drive in the vicinity of the site such
that project-related pedestrians can easily access a confroUed crosswalk. There should not be a large
amount of pedestrian activity between the site and the north side of Carlsbad Village Drive. An
uncontrolled mid-block crosswalk is not recommended.
LiNSCon, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
17 Carlsbad Medical Village
mt 559\Rq)0rfM 559_rpl.doc
12.0 SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
12.1 Significance of Impacts
Based on the City of Carlsbad's established significance criteria, there are no significant impacts
calculated for any of the key intersections or sfreet segments.
12.1.1 Direct Impacts
Based on the City of Carlsbad's established significance criteria, there are no significant direct
project impacts calculated for any of the key intersections or sfreet segments.
12.1.2 Cumulative Impacts
Year 2030 Segment Analysis was conducted along Carlsbad Village Drive and the analysis indicated
that there is no significant cumulative project impacts calculated for any of the sfreet segments.
12.2 Mitigation Measure
No significant fraffic impacts are calculated due to project fraffic and all the key intersections and
sfreet segments are forecasted to operate at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, mitigation measures are not
necessary.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 3-05-1559
18 Carlsbad Medical Village
N:\15S9\Repon\1559_rpl.doc
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
APPENDIX A
INTERSECTION MACHINE COUNT
WORKSHEETS
TrafBc Impact Analysis
Counted By: Emp. # 03
Location: Pio Pico Drive & Carlsbad Village Drive
Linscott Law & Greenspan
4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111
Start Date: 06/07/2005
File Name: 394-02-1
Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Interval
Time
Right
Total
7:00 3 3 5 0 15 124 9 0 32 8 1 2 12 94 33 0 341
7:15 3 7 9 0 13 164 9 4 47 5 3 2 8 68 25 0 367
7:30 2 14 15 0 28 156 21 5 44 16 8 1 15 60 24 0 409
7:45 2 13 8 0 29 157 32 3 49 11 11 1 14 72 12 0 414
Total 10 37 37 0 85 601 71 12 172 40 23 6 49 294 94 0 1531
8:00 2 16 16 0 15 129 23 1 38 4 2 1 15 58 15 0 335
8:15 3 7 8 0 13 125 9 3 30 8 4 1 13 78 24 0 326
8:30 2 9 4 1 12 110 6 1 33 4 7 2 17 70 24 0 302
8:45 2 5 13 0 11 108 6 0 32 8 12 0 13 107 22 0 339
Total 9 37 41 1 51 472 44 5 133 24 25 4 58 313 85 0 1302
Grand Total 19 74 78 1 136 1073 115 17 305 64 48 10 107 607 179 0 2833
Approach% 11.0 43.0 45.3 0.6 10.1 80.0 8.6 1.3 71.4 15.0 11.2 2.3 12.0 68.0 20.0 _
Total% 0.7 2.6 2.8 0.0 4.8 37.9 4.1 0.6 10.8 2.3 1.7 0.4 3.8 21.4 6.3 -
Peak hour analysis for the period 07:00 to 07:45
Volume 10 37 37 -85 601 71 12 172 40 23 6 49 294 94 _ 1,531
Approach% 11.9 44.0 44.0 -11.1 78.2 9.2 1.6 71.4 16.6 9.5 2.5 11.2 67.3 21.5 _
Total% 0.7 2.4 2.4 -5.6 39.3 4.6 0.8 11.2 2.6 1.5 0.4 3.2 19.2 6.1 _
PHF 0.68 0.87 0.84 0.79
Report Generated by "Tuming Point Traffic Service" all rights reserved
Linscott Law & Greenspan
4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111
Counted By: Emp. # 03
Location: Pio Pico Drive & Carlsbad Village Drive
Start Date: 06/07/2005
File Name: 394-02-1
Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad Village Drive
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Interval
Time
Right
Total
16:00 3 4 14 0 10 100 4 1 36 4 5 2 13 162 23 0 381
16:15 4 8 14 1 11 114 8 6 38 9 5 3 14 134 17 0 386
16:30 3 1 12 0 14 119 3 7 32 7 9 5 15 154 18 1 400
16:45 2 5 16 1 9 135 14 6 35 8 9 3 16 171 26 0 456
Total 12 18 56 2 44 468 29 20 141 28 28 13 58 621 84 1 1623
17:00 11 8 20 4 13 112 7 8 45 14 9 6 19 163 29 0 468
17:15 4 8 11 3 9 148 8 0 27 6 6 1 20 175 17 0 443
17:30 9 6 17 0 15 129 17 0 36 5 9 0 22 158 26 0 449
17:45 3 5 6 3 9 123 9 1 38 5 10 0 21 171 32 0 436
Total 27 27 54 10 46 512 41 9 146 30 34 7 82 667 104 0 1796
Grand Total 39 45 110 12 90 980 70 29 287 58 62 20 140 1288 188 1 3419
Approach% 18.9 21.8 53.4 5.8 7.7 83.8 6.0 2.5 67.2 13.6 14.5 4.7 8.7 79.7 11.6 0.1
Total% 1.1 1.3 3.2 0.4 2.6 28.7 2.0 0.8 8.4 1.7 1.8 0.6 4.1 37.7 5.5 0.0
Peak hour analysis for the period 16:4S to 17:30
Volume 26 27 64 8 46 524 46 14 143 33 33 10 77 667 98 -1,816
Approach% 20.8 21.6 51.2 6.4 7.3 83.2 7.3 2.2 65.3 15.1 15.1 4.6 9.1 79.2 11.6 -
Total% 1.4 1.5 3.5 0.4 2.5 28.9 2.5 0.8 7.9 1.8 1.8 0.6 4.2 36.7 5.4 -
PHF 0.73 0.95 0.74 0.99
Report Generated by "Tuming Point Traffic Service" all rights reserved
Linscott Law & Greenspan
4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111
Counted By: Emp. # 04
Location: Highland Drive & Carisbad Village Drive
Start Date: 06/07/2005
File Name: 394-01-1
Highland Drive Carlsbad Village Drive Highland Drive Carlsbad Village Drive
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Interval
Time
Right
Total
7:00 2 23 0 0 12 119 2 0 12 8 3 2 1 71 18 0 273
7:15 11 30 5 0 22 158 5 0 17 29 14 0 0 64 17 0 372
7:30 6 27 6 2 33 191 11 0 19 22 16 0 1 57 5 0 396
7:45 10 18 7 0 15 199 9 1 18 14 14 3 0 73 4 0 385
Total 29 98 18 2 82 667 27 1 66 73 47 5 2 265 44 0 1426
8:00 13 8 3 1 8 152 3 0 16 12 5 0 0 53 5 0 279
8:15 11 5 2 1 14 123 3 0 7 8 6 0 0 64 6 1 251
8:30 3 6 1 0 13 117 1 0 12 13 4 2 0 67 3 0 242
8:45 9 6 1 0 4 116 2 0 12 10 3 27 1 103 4 2 300
Total 36 25 7 2 39 508 9 0 47 43 18 29 1 287 18 3 1072
Grand Total 65 123 25 4 121 1175 36 1 113 116 65 34 3 552 62 3 2498
Approach% 30.0 56.7 11.5 1.8 9.1 88.1 2.7 0.1 34.5 35.4 19.8 10.4 0.5 89.0 10.0 0.5
Total% 2.6 4.9 1.0 0.2 4.8 47.0 1.4 0.0 4.5 4.6 2.6 1.4 0.1 22.1 2.5 0.1
Peak hour analysis for the period 07:15 to 08:00 1,432 Volume 40 83 21 3 78 700 28 1 70 77 49 3 1 247 31 -1,432
Approach% 27.2 56.5 14.3 2.0 9.7 86.7 3.5 0.1 35.2 38.7 24.6 1.5 0.4 88.5 11.1 -
Total% 2.8 5.8 1.5 0.2 5.4 48.9 2.0 0.1 4.9 5.4 3.4 0.2 0.1 17.2 2.2 -
PHF 0.80 0.86 0.83 0.86
Report Generated by "Tuming Point Traffic Service" all rights reserved
Linscott Law & Greenspan
4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111
Counted By: Emp. #04
Location: Highland Drive & Carlsbad Village Drive
Start Date: 06/07/2005
File Name: 394-01-2
Highland Drive Carlsbad Village Drive Highland Drive Carlsbad Village Drive
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Interval
Time
Right
Total
16:00 8 2 0 2 10 99 1 0 8 3 4 0 2 142 10 0 291
16:15 6 7 3 4 9 106 4 0 7 3 7 0 2 146 14 0 318
16:30 4 10 4 0 10 127 2 0 9 7 4 0 5 150 13 1 346
16:45 10 11 3 2 8 133 7 0 12 7 8 0 4 168 9 1 383
Total 28 30 10 8 37 465 14 0 36 20 23 0 13 606 46 2 1338
17:00 16 5 3 2 6 130 3 1 13 7 9 0 8 165 11 0 379
17:15 9 4 0 0 8 139 6 0 11 3 3 0 3 190 15 0 391
17:30 15 13 1 0 8 165 8 0 8 9 4 0 3 171 10 0 415
17:45 13 19 3 0 13 139 9 0 14 4 6 0 8 169 4 0 401
Total 53 41 7 2 35 573 26 1 46 23 22 0 22 695 40 0 1586
Grand Total 81 71 17 10 72 1038 40 1 82 43 45 0 35 1301 86 2 2924
Approach% 45.3 39.7 9.5 5.6 6.3 90.2 3.5 0.1 48.2 25.3 26.5 -2.5 91.4 6.0 0.1
Total% 2.8 2.4 0.6 0.3 2.5 35.5 1.4 0.0 2.8 1.5 1.5 -1.2 44.5 2.9 0.1
Peak hour analysis for the period 17:00 to 17:45 1,586 Volume 53 41 7 2 35 573 26 1 46 23 22 -22 695 40 -1,586
Approach% 51.5 39.8 6.8 1.9 5.5 90.2 4.1 0.2 50.5 25.3 24.2 -2.9 91.8 5.3 -
Total% 3.3 2.6 0.4 0.1 2.2 36.1 1.6 0.1 2.9 1.5 1.4 -1.4 43.8 2.5 -
PHF 0.74 0.88 0.78 0.91
Report Generated by "Tuming Point Traffic Service" all rights reserved
4-2S-05; 3:2SPM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;7SO SQ2 85S2 # 18/ 25
cmr OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMER 2004
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Intersection Number: 45
Intersection Location: I-5/Carisbad Village Drive
Southbound Ramp
Contents: Turn Movement Count Summary Page 1
(A.M.andP.M.)
A.M. Peak Hour ICU Analysis and Page 2
Tum Movement Diagram
P.M. Peak Hour ICU Analysis and Page 3
Turn Movement Diagram
RICK
ENGINEERINGCOM^OT
Transportation Division
I
n RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY TURNING MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
Page I of 3
City: Carlsbad-
Intersection of: N/S Street: 1-5 Southbound Ramps
• E/W Street: Carlsbad Village Drive
Count Date:
07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Weather: Sunny
File: 2004Int#45
Data Collected by: David, Judy
Traffic Control: Signalized
South Approach (NB) North Approach (SB) West Approach (EB) East Approach (WB) 15 min Total
End of 15 Vehicles Peds min. prd. Left U-Trn Thru Right Peds Left U-Tm Thru Right Peds Left U-Tm Thru Right Peds Left U-Tm Thm Right Peds Vehicles Peds
6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 .0 I 0 0 22 0 0 0 40 36 3 17 0 28 0 0 144 3
6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 30 0 0 0 60 46 0 33 0 49 0 1 228 1
6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 28 0 0 0 49 44 1 46 0 62 0 0 241 I
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 31 0 0 0 77 35 1 46 0 87 0 2 286 3
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 40 0 0 0 77 59 1 56 0 95 0 0 341 1
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 46 0 0 0 84 62 1 47 0 108 0 1 361 2
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 38 0 0 0 97 49 I 55 0 121 0 1 376 2
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 1 48 0 0 0 108 58 77 0 133 0 1 445 1
8:15 AM * 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 59 0 0 0 102 47 1 71 0 162 0 2 463 3
8:30 AM * 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 1 52 0 0 0 116 66 1 47 0 160 0 2 467 3
8:45 AM * 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 68 0 0 0 97 52 5 43 0 150 0 0 428 5
9:00 AM * 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 . 0 60 0 0 0 109 55 2 37 0 171 0 2 451 4
Max. 15 min. 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 1 68 0 0 0 116 66 5 77 0 171 0 2 467 5
Pfc.Hr.Vol. 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 1 239 0 0 0 424 220 9 198 0 643 . 0 6 1809 15
8:00 AM Peak Intersection Traffic in Pk. Hr. = 1809 Peak Hr. Factor 0.97
9:00 AM Hour Intersection Pdstrns in Pk. Hr, = 15
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 81 0 0 0 181 69 1 62 0 164 0 2 597 3
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 98 0 0 0 225 93 5 23 0 170 0 17 634 22
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 . 0 23 0 0 87 0 0 0 212 93 1 32 0 149 0 I 596 2
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 81 0 0 0 193 64 2 51 0 188 0 0 616 2
4:45 PM * 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 93 0 0 0 228 87 2 38 0 150 6 2 633 . 4
5:00 PM * 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 92 0 0 0 236 78 4 29 0 190 0 5 663 9
5:15 PM * 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 98 0 0 0 224 88 10 57 0 171 0 3 674 13
5:30 PM * 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 1 114 0 0 0 201 83 2 47 0 160 0 5 640 7
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1 83 0 0 0 204 76 8 35 0 159 0 0 582 8
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 72 0 0 0 213 68 6 24 0 150 0 2 553 8
6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 90 0 0 0 210 76 2 37 0 181 0 0 624 2
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 65 0 0 0 183 75 3 46 0 177 0 1 574 4
Max. 15 min. 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 1 114 0 0 0 236 93 10 62 0 190 0 17 674 22
Pk. Hr. Vol. 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 1 397 0 Q 0 889 336 18 171 0 671 0 15 2610 33
4:30 PM Peak Intersection TrafBc in Pk. Hr. = 2610 PeakHr. Factor 0.97
5:30 PM Hour Intersection Pdstms in Pk. Hr. = = 33
o
01
H
<
0
Tl
o >
V
r
ro >
0)
o
0) o IS)
<B
01
0)
SO
(0 \
01
4-28-05; 3:2SPM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;760 S02 8562 # 20/ 25
1-5 Southbound Ramps at Carlsbad ViUage Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
8:00 AM to
9:00 AM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Conflg - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1
1 1
1 I
I
1
1
LaneSetUngs 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2.0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the EastAVest phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0 84 1 239 0 424 220 198 643 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 0 85 239 0 644 0 198 643 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.11 0.16 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.13 0.16 0.11
ICU Ratio = 0.50 LOS = A
t Turning Movements at Intersection of:
Time: 8:00 AM
to 9:00 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: David, Judy
Sub-
Totals totals
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
1526
882
644
I-S Southbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
North Approach
0
424
220
Subtotals
Total
324
239 1
419
0
0
419
0
0
1-5 Southbound Ramps
324
0
84
• t
North
^ t r
V
0
643
198 0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
841
508
1349
E
a
s
' t
A
P
P
r
Carlsbad Village Drive
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-turns in bold.
4-28-05; 3:2ePM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;760 602 8SS2 # 2 1/ 25
I
D
1-5 Southbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) • North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:30 PM to
5:30 PM Left Thru Right Left Thra Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 2 0 1 2 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Arc thc East/West phases split (Y/N)? N .
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00
Critical Factors
ICU Ratio = 0.73 LOS =
Tuming Movements at Intersection of:
145 1 397 0 889 336 171 671 0
0 146 397 0 1225 0 171 ,671 0
0.00 0.07 0.22 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.00
0.22 0.31 0.10
I-S Southbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
Time: 4:30 PM
to 5:30 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name; David, Judy
North Approach 1-5 Southbound Ramps
Totals
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
2293
Sub-
totals
1068
1225
543
397 1
543
0
145
0
889
336
"1
Subtotals
Total
508
0
0
508
t
tortl
t
0
0
.North V
0
671
171
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
842
1876
1034
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
Carlsbad Village Drive
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
4-28-05; 3:26PM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;7SO 602 8SS2 # 22/ 25
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMER 2004
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Intersection Number: 46
Intersection Location: I-5/Carlsbad Village Drive
Northbound Ramp
Contents: Tum Movement Count Summary Page 1
(A.M. and P.M.)
A,M. Peak Hour ICU Analysis and Page 2
Turn Movement Diagram
P.M, Peak Hour ICU Analysis and Page 3
Turn Movement Diagram
RICK
ENGINEEWNGCOMPANY
Transponation Division
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY TURNING MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
City: Carlsbad
Intersection of: N/S Street: 1-5 Northbound Ramps
E/W Street: Carlsbad Village Drive
File: 2004Int#46
Data Collected by: Mike, Mike
Page 1 of 3 h I N CD I O 01
Coimt Date:
07/13/04
End of 15
min. prd.
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30/LM
8:45 AM
9:00 AM
Max. 15 min.
Pk. Hr. Vol.
Day: Tuesday
Weather: Sunny
TrafiHc Control: Signalized
7:30 AM
8:30 AM
Peak
Hour
South Approach (NB) North Approach (SB) West Approach (EB) East Approach (WB) 15 min Total
Left U-Tm Thru Right Peds Left U-Tm Thm Right Peds Left U-Tm Thra Right Peds Left U-Tra Thm Right Peds Vehicles Peds
17 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0" 0 32 0 19 0 4 0 0 69 25 0 175 4
16 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 25 0 0 0 0 76 30 1 206 1
27 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 25 0 2 0 0 95 38 1 246 3
23 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 49 0 0 0 0 110 13 2 262 2
27 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 38 0 1 0 0 127 23 0 275 1
31 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 46 0 1 0 0 120 35 2 298 3
46 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 59 0 1 0 0 149 33 2 382 3
69 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 69 0 2 0 0 152 45 1 457 3
58 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 57 0 0 0 0 143 28 1 390 I
71 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 60 0 0 0 0 115 32 1 370 1
77 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 65 0 0 0 0 104 34 0 353 0
74 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 69 0 2 0 0 121 25 2 375 4
77 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 69 0 4 0 0 152 45 2 457 4
244 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 245 0 3 0 0 559 138 5 1599 8
Peak Hr. Factor 0.87
0) V
<:
Intersection Pdstms in Pk. Hr. = 8
3:45 PM 69 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 141 0 2 0 0 143 27 2 551 4
4:00 PM 77 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 167 0 6 0 0 134 36 21 563 27
4:15 PM 29 0 0 33 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 147 0 0 0 0 150 38 8 503 8
4:30 PM 56 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 160 0 7 0 0 183 23 1 562 8
4:45 PM 84 0 5 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 156 0 . 2 0 0 110 32 4 550 6
5:00 PM * 69 0 51 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 186 0 0 0 0 150 31 2 677 2
5:15 PM * 58 0 1 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 198 0 11 0 0 168 42 2 647 13
5:30 PM * 43 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 203 0 1 0 0 144 39 1 583 2
5:45 PM • 67 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 166 0 3 0 0 130 43 3 602 6
6:00 PM 56 0 0 70 2 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 195 0 6 0 0 117 41 1 594 9
6:15 PM 55 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 171 0 0 0 0 144 48 0 592 0
6:30 PM 98 0 1 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 164 0 2 0 0 114 46 1 657 3
Max. 15 min. 98 0 51 70 2 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 203 0 U 0 0 183 48 21 677 27
Pk. Hr. Vol. 237 0 52 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 521 0 753 0 15 0 0 592 155 8 2509 23
PeakHr. Factor
5:45 PM Hour Intersection Pdstms in Pk. Hr. = 23
0.93
4-28-05; 3:2SPM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;760 S02 8562 # 24/ 25
I
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad ViUage Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:30 AM to
8:30 AM Left Thm Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1 ^
Config- (left) 2 1 1
urations 3 1
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
•
1
1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 I 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are thc East/West phases split (Y/N)?
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume
Adjusted Hourly Volume
Utilization Factor
Critical Factors
N
N
244 0 143 0 0 0 270 245 0 0 559 138
0 244 143 0 0 0 270 245 0 0 697 0
0.00 0.12 0.08 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00
0.12 0.00 0.15 0.17
ICU Ratio = 0.54 LOS= A
P
D
Tuming Movements at Intersection of;
Time: 7:30AM
to 8:30 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: Mike, Mike
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Totals
1318
Sub-
totals
803
515
1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
North Approach
270
245
0
Subtotals
Total
1,
*1
i
t
Jortl
t
North
244 0
0
0 387
387
South Approach
1-5 Northbound Ramps
408
0
0
r 143
408
138
559
0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
697
Totals
1085
388
Carkbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tiims in bold.
4.-28-OS; 3:2ePM;CITY OF CARLSBAD ;760 S02 8562 # 25/ 25
I
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to Right 5:45 PM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Uft Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Conflg - (left) 2 1 1 1
1 urations 3 1 1 1
4
5
6
1 1 I
Outside 7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 I 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
592 155 Hourly Volume 237 52 199 0 0 0 521 753 0 0 592 155
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 289 199 0 0 0 521 753 0 0 747 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.14 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.19 0.00 0.00 0,19 0.00
Critical Factors 0.14 0.00 0.29 0.19
ICU Ratio _ 0.72 LOS = e
p Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: Mike, Mike
Sub-
Totals totals
2103
829
0 521
1274 753
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
lr North
South Approach
1-5 Northbound Ramps
728
0
0
t
^ t r
237 52 199
0
0 488
488
728
155
592
0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
747
Totals
1699
952
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
5
t
A
P
P
r
Note: Left-tum volumes include
U-turns. U-turns in bold.
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
APPENDIXB
CUMULATIVE PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
WORKSHEETS
Traffic Impact Analysis
SEE y 1086 \' MAP
I . II • • . I •' • • •••—!JL \i" •.. . i-g'..- a. 1 -- B- V— ^'i ^^v*" HI ~ i-;??- 1 ...|. -. \ rt
K'^> '•'-"^^^•'--•^•^•'^i^ BEST
»vv^.#
, SARATOSt sr
SEE'v^H3
1 VIA DIES)
2 VIA JUDY
3 VIA RDSEKTO 4 VIA BOCAS 5 VIA SABIKAS 6 VIA VERA 7 VIA CAROa 8 VIA DENISE 9 VIA MERDE 10 VIA TONAU 11 CL HACIENDA 12 VIA CAJFTA
MD'.
^ V
^^^^ -
Inisl
ACAIJL.. ...
A A0fP8ESS\W
CARISBAD
IT
BEACH
'Ml i
13or
WRHiORO I
ms. nilNSTAN ST
^ VILLAGE ,2900
'.ihsfA.iff
LN
fflMZEE
BEACH)
TV
vc.\\'
SEEN / MAP
HEDIONDA
SEE\
ST
Cumulative Projects
Map # # Name Land Use Size ADT AM PM Check-Total Map # # Name Land Use Size
Rate Vol %ADT %ln % Out In Out % ADT %ln % Out In Out AM PM
1 Magnolia Single Family 11 10 110 8% 30% 70% 3 6 10% 70 i 30% 8 3 9 11
2 Village by the Sea Condo 65 8 520 8% 20% 80% 8 33 10% 70% 30% 36 16 42 52
Retail 8662 120 10,394 3% Viso% 40% 187 125 9% 50% 50% 468 468 312 935
New Trips (retail) 88 59 220 220
3 Laguna Point Condo 21 8 168 8% 20% 80% 3 11 10% ,70% 30% 12 5 13 17
4 1265 Carlsbad Village Drive Office 8981 20 1,796 14% ••90% 10% 226 25 13% - 20% 80% 47 187 251 234
5 Casa Montessori de Vista Schooi 24 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Lincoln 8i Oak Mixed Use Town Homes 6 8 48 8% 20% 80% 1 3 10% 70% 30% 3 1 4 5
Retail 1984 120 2,381 3% 60% 40% 43 29 *' 9% 50% 50% 107 107 71 214
New Trips (retail) 20 13 50 50
Total 349 150 376 482
1*1
REV. 3/23/04
NOTES:
- AM/PM Peak hour volumes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LLG1390.DWG
LINSCOii
LAW
GKEtNSPAN
ENGINEERS
REV. 3/23/04
NOTES:
- AM/PM Peak hour volunnes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LLG1390.DWG
LINSCOTT
LAW
(.RELNSI'AN
ENGINEERS
-^H^2_QJ|^^ ^V^,^J^HUT ,^^^1^
REV. 3/23/04
NOTES:
- AM/PM Peak hour volunnes are
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LLG1390.DWG
LINSCOTT
LAW
GRLtNSI'AN
ENGINEERS
1^1
NOTES:
- AM/PM Peak hour volunnes are
shown at the intersections
REV. 3/23/04 NO SCALE
LLG1390.DWG
LINSC C:)TT
LAW X
C.I^ELNSI'AN
ENGINEERS
Am I plvi
IKl
CUT 1 50
BASE
•f^Mess:'!^ School
SEA VIEW OFFICE VILLAGE
NOTES:
- AM/PM Peak hour volunnes are
shown at the intersections
REV. 3/23/04
LLG1390.DWG
NO SCALE
LINSCOTT
LAW
C.KEENSPAN
ENGINEERS
REV. 3/23/04
NOTES:
— AM/PM Peak hour volumes ore
shown at the intersections
NO SCALE
LLG13gO.DW6
LINSCOTT
LAW \
CR EEN SPAN
ENGINEERS
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
APPENDIX C
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEETS
Traffic Impact Analysis
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
8:00 AM to
9:00 AM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 Capacity
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are tiie East/West phases split (Y/N)?
0
Y
N
0 2000 1800 0 4000 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0 84 1 239 0 424 220 198 643 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 0 85 239 0 644 0 198 643 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.11 0.16 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.16 0.11
ICU Ratio = 0.50 LOS = A
K\ISTI.N(i
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad ViUage Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 8:00 AM
to 9:00 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
Totals
1526
Sub-
totals
882
644
North Approach
0
424
220
239
Subtotals
Total
419
0
0
419
324
1
North
1-5 Southbound
324
0
84
t
^ t r
0
643
198
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
841
Totals
1349
508
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) Nortii Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:30 PM to
5:30 PM Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thru Right Left Thm Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1 1 1
urations 3
4
e
1
Outside
D
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 0 0 0 2000 1800 0 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N) ? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0 145 1 397 0 889 336 171 671 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 0 146 397 0 1225 0 171 671 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.22 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.31 0.10
ICU Ratio _ 0.73 LOS = C
Turning Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:30 PM
to 5:30 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2293
Sub-
totals
1068
1225
0
889
336
Subtotals
Total
397
508
0
0
508
543
1
North
1-5 Southbound
544
1
145
• t
^ t r
0
671
-171
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
842
Totals
1875
1033
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:30 AM to
8:30 AM Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thm Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1 1 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1
Outside
J
6
1
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N) ? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 244 0 143 0 0 0 270 245 0 0 559 138
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 244 143 0 0 0 270 245 0 0 697 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00
Critical Factors 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.17
ICU Ratio = 0.54 LOS = A
KXISTl.NC;
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:30 AM
to 8:30 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
Totals
1318
Sub-
totals
803
515
270
245
0
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
244
0
387
0
0
North
0
387
408
0
0
1-5 Northbound Ramps
Total
• t 1
*i t r
143
408
138
559
0
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
697
388
Totals
1085
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1 1 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N) ? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 237 52 199 0 0 0 521 753 0 0 592 155
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 289 199 0 0 0 521 753 0 0 747 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.14 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00
Critical Factors 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.19
ICU Ratio _ 0.72 LOS = C
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time : 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2103
Sub-
totals
829
1274
521
753
0
Subtotals
Total
1
237
0
488
t
North
t
52
488
1-5 Northbound Ramps
729
1
0
r 199
729
155
592
- 0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
747
Totals
1698
951
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:00 AM to
8:00 AM Left Thm Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N) ? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 172 40 23 10 37 37 49 294 94 85 601 71
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 235 0 0 84 0 49 388 0 85 672 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.17 0.00
Critical Factors 0.12 0.04 0.03 0.17
ICU Ratio 0.46 LOS = A
EXISTING
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:00 AM
to 8:00 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name :
Totals
1247
Sub-
totals
810
437
49
294
94
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
37
216
84
37
t
North
t 172 40
0
235
451
244
0
10
Pio Pico Drive
160
r 23
71
601
85
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
757
Totals
1084
327
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 1800 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases spUt (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 143 33 33 64 27 26 77 667 98 46 524 46
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 209 0 117 53 0 77 765 0 46 570 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.14 0.00
Critical Factors 0.10 0.07 0.19 0.03
ICU Ratio = 0.49 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Viiiage Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name :
North Approach
Totals
1535
Sub-
totals
693
842
77
667
98
Subtotals
Total
171
26
1
143
0
380
117
27
North
33
209
274
1
64
Pio Pico Drive
157
t 46
524
-46
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
616
Totals
1379
33
763
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:15 AM to
8:15 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are tiie North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 70 77 49 40 83 21 1 247 31 78 700 28
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 196 0 0 144 0 1 278 0 78 728 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.18 0.00
Critical Factors 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.18
ICU Ratio __ 0.38 LOS = A
KXISTING
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:15AM
to 8:15 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1070
Sub-
totals
791
279
North Approach
1
247
31
Subtotals
Total
21
192
144
83
t
North
t 70 77
0
196
388
Highland Drive
250
0
40
r 49
106
28
700
78
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
806
Totals
1142
336
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
5:00 PM to
6:00 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 11 1 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 46 23 22 53 41 7 22 695 40 35 573 26
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 91 0 0 101 0 22 735 0 35 599 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.02 0.15 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.05 0.18 0.02
ICU Ratio = 0.35 LOS = A
KxisriM;
Turning Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 5:00 PM
to 6:00 PM
Date : 6/7/05\
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1383
Sub-
totals
626
757
22
695
40
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
116
101
41
t
North
t 46 23
0
91
207
Highland Drive
173
1
53
r 22
72
26
573
-35
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
634
Totals
769
Carlsbad Village Drive
1403
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
8:00 AM to
9:00 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 Capacity
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)?
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0
Utilization Factor 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
Y
N
0
0
0.00
0.00
0 2000 1800 0 4000 0 1800 4000 0
98
0
0.00
1
99
0.05
239 0 430 220 202 644 0
239 0 650 0 202 644 0
0.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.11 0.16 0.00
0.13 0.16 0.11
ICU Ratio = 0.50 LOS= A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 8:00 AM
to 9:00 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
1533
Sub-
totals
883
650
0
430
220
Subtotals
Total
423
239
1
0
0
423
338
1
North
1-5 Southbound
338
0
98
t r 0 0
0
0
644
202
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
846
Totals
1374
528
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:30 PM to
5:30 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 Capacity
Are the North/Soutii phases split (Y/N)?
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)?
0
Y
N
0 2000 1800 0 4000 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0 154 1 397 0 893 336 194 680 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 0 155 397 0 1229 0 171 680 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.22 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.31 0.10
ICU Ratio = 0.73 LOS = C
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:30 PM
to 5:30 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2306
Sub-
totals
1077
1229
0
893
336
Subtotals
Total
397
531
552
1
i
t
North
t 0 0
0
0
531
1-5 Southbound
553
1
154
V
r
0
680
-194
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
874
Totals
1920
1046
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:30 AM to
8:30 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config- (left) 2 1 1
urations 3 1
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1
1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 244 0 157
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 244 157
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.12 0.09
Critical Factors 0.12
0 1800 4000 0 0 4000
0 0 0 270 265 0 0 564 142
0 0 0 270 265 0 0 706 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.18
ICU Ratio = 0.55 LOS= A
KxisTLNc; +PROJECI;
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time : 7:30 AM
to 8:30 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
Totals
1343
Sub-
totals
808
535
270
265
0
Subtotals
Total
North Approach 1-5 Northbound Ramps
412
0
0
0 0 0
J t
t
North
*] t r 244 0 157
0
401
401
412
142
564
0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
706
Totals
1128
422
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config- (left) 2 1 1
urations 3 1
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1
1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800
Are the North/Soutii phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 237 52 209
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 289 209
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.14 0.12
Critical Factors 0.14
1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
0 0 0 521 766 0 0 624 178
0 0 0 521 766 0 0 802 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.20
ICU Ratio = 0.73
FAISTING + PROJKCT
Tuming Movements at Intersection of:
LOS= C
1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time : 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2148
Sub-
totals
861
1287
521
766
0
Subtotals
Total
i
237
0
498
North
52
498
1-5 Northbound Ramps
752
1
0
752
t 178
624
- 0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
802
Totals
1776
^ t r
209
974
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:00 AM to
8:00 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are tiie North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 172 40 26 11 37 37 49 328 94 86 610 71
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 238 0 0 85 0 49 422 0 86 681 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.17 0.00
Critical Factors 0.12 0.04 0.03 0.17
ICU Ratio 0.46 LOS = A
KXISTING+ PKOJECr
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:00 AM
to 8:00 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name:
North Approach
Totals
1290
Sub-
totals
819
471
49
328
94
85
37 37
Subtotals
Total
217
t
North
t
172 40
0
238
455
245
0
11
Pio Pico Drive
160
r 26
71
610
86
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
767
Totals
1132
365
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad ViUage Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
D
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 1800 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are tiie North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 143 33 35 64 27 27 77 690 98 50 579 48
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 211 0 118 54 0 77 788 0 50 627 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.00 0.03 0.16 0.00
Critical Factors 0.11 0.07 0.20 0.03
ICU Ratio 0.51 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1614
Sub-
totals
749
865
77
690
98
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
27
175
143
0
386
118
27
33
211
277
1
64
Pio Pico Drive
159
t
North
^ t r
35
48
579
-50
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
677
Totals
1465
788
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:15 AM to
8:15 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the EastAVest phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 74 77 49 40 83 25 2 249 32 78 710 28
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 200 0 0 148 0 2 281 0 78 738 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.18 0.00
Critical Factors 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.18
ICU Ratio _ 0.38 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:15 AM
to 8:15 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1092
Sub-
totals
809
283
2
249
32
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
25
i
193
148
83
North
t 74 77
0
200
393
Highland Drive
255
0
40
r 49
107
28
710
78
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
816
Totals
1154
338
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
5:00 PM to
6:00 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 11 1 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 10 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)?
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 49 23
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 94
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.05
Critical Factors 0.00
ICU Ratio = 0.36
0
N
N
22
0
0.00
LOS^
0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000
53 41 10 28 711 47 35 580 26
0 104 0 28 758 0 35 606 0
0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.02 0.15 0.00
0.05 0.19 0.02
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 5:00 PM
to 6:00 PM
Date: 6/7/05\
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1425
Sub-
totals
639
786
28
711
47
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
10
123
104
41
t
North
t 49 23
0
94
217
Highland Drive
182
1
53
f
r 22
78
26
580
-35
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
641
Totals
1426
785
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
8:00 AM to
9:00 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 Capacity
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)?
0
Y
N
0 2000 1800 0 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0 0 155 1 269 0 505 262 210 711 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 0 156 269 0 767 0 210 711 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.15 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.19 0.12
ICU Ratio = 0.56 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 8:00 AM
to 9:00 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
1747
Sub-
totals
980
767
0
505
262
1-5 Southbound
Subtotals
Total
473
425
425
0
269 1 155
J L
A t T
•M
1
North
t r 0 0 0
0
473
0
0
711
210
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
921
Totals
1581
660
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Southbound at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:30 PM to
5:30 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Lane Settings 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 Capacity
Are the Nortii/South phases split (Y/N)?
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)?
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 0 0
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00
Critical Factors 0.00 0.00
0
Y
N
0
0
0.00
0.00
0 2000 1800 0 4000
167
0
0.00
1800 4000 0
1
168
0.08
472 0 1042 415 243 866 0
472 0 1457 0 171 866 0
0.26 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.10 0.22 0.00
0.26 0.36 0.10
ICU Ratio = 0.82 LOS= D
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time : 4:30 PM
to 5:30 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2795
Sub-
totals
1338
1457
0
1042
415
472
lr
Subtotals
Total
659
640
1
North
0 0
0
0
659
1-5 Southbound
641
1
167
t
t r
0
866
-243
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
1109
Totals
2317
1208
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:30 AM to
8:30 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1
Config- (left) 2 1 1 1 1 1
urations 3
4
1 1
Outside
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
Are tiie North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 277 0 215 0 0 0 295 372 0 0 606 149
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 277 215 0 0 0 295 372 0 0 755 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00
Critical Factors 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.19
ICU Ratio 0.59 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
Time : 7:30 AM
to 8:30 AM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
1550
Sub-
totals
883
667
295
372
0
Subtotals
Total
277
0
492
North
0
492
1-5 Northbound Ramps
444
0
0
444
• t
^ t r 215
149
606
0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
755
Totals
1342
587
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
1-5 Northbound Ramps at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 1
Config- (left) 2 1 1
urations 3 1
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1
1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 1800 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 331 52 223 0 0 0 592 857 0 0 770 226
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 383 223 0 0 0 592 857 0 0 996 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00
Critical Factors 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.25
ICU Ratio = 0.87
Turning Movements at Intersection of:
LOS= D
1-5 Northbound Ramps and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 07/13/04
Day: Tuesday
Name: 0
North Approach
Totals
2550
Sub-
totals
1101
1449
592
857
0
Subtotals
Total
331
0
606
North
1-5 Northbound Ramps
871
1
0
• t
1
^ t r
52 223
606
871
226
770
- 0
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
996
Totals
2075
1079
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:00 AM to
8:00 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thm Right
Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Config - (left) 2 1 1
urations 3
4
C
1 1 1 1
Outside
J
6
7
Free-flow
Lane Settings 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0 0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N) ? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 172 40 41 18 37 37 49 493 94 90 659 73
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 253 0 0 92 0 49 587 0 90 732 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.18 0.00
Critical Factors 0.13 0.05 0.03 0.18
ICU Ratio 0.49 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
Time: 7:00 AM
to 8:00 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name :
Totals
1504
Sub-
totals
868
636
North Approach
49
493
94
Subtotals
Total
92
37 37
221
North
172 40
0
253
474
254
0
18
Pio Pico Drive
162
• t
^ t r
41
73
659
90
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
822
Totals
1374
552
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Pio Pico Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
4:45 PM to
5:45 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 11 1 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Y
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
1800 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 143 33 40 64 27 30 77 795 98 63 773 54
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 216 0 121 57 0 77 893 0 63 827 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.21 0.00
Critical Factors 0.11 0.07 0.22 0.04
ICU Ratio = 0.54 LOS = A
t.XlSTI.NG + PROJECT + CUM
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Pio Pico Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 4:45 PM
to 5:45 PM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name :
Totals
1916
Sub-
totals
946
970
77
795
98
Subtotals
Total
North Approach
30
121
27
North
143 33
0
216
404
286
1
64
Pio Pico Drive
165
f
^ t r
40
54
773
-63
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
890
Totals
1788
898
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
7:15 AM to
8:15 AM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 11 1 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 10 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
0 2000 0 1800 4000 1800 4000 0
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 90 87 78 56 93 26 2 417 50 93 743 30
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 255 0 0 175 0 2 467 0 93 773 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.00
Critical Factors 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.19
ICU Ratio = 0.42 LOS = A
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time: 7:15 AM
to 8:15 AM
Date: 06/07/05
Day: Tuesday
Name:
Totals
1328
Sub-
totals
859
469
North Approach
2
417
50
Subtotals
Total
26
236
175
93
t
North
t 90 87
0
255
491
Highland Drive
294
0
56
r 78
119
30
743
93
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
866
Totals
1417
551
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
Highland Drive at Carlsbad Village Drive
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of3
Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB)
5:00 PM to
6:00 PM Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right Left Thra Right
Lane Inside 11 1 1
Config - (left) 2
urations 3
4
5
6
Outside 7
Free-flow
1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
Lane Settings 0 10 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Capacity 0 2000 0
Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N
Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volume 75 33 38
Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 146 0
Utilization Factor 0.00 0.07 0.00
Critical Factors 0.07
0 2000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 4000 0
56
0
0.00
0.00
51
119
0.06
12
0
0.00
30 799 70 61 765 39
30 869 0 61 804 0
0.02 0.22 0.00 0.03 0.20 0.00
0.22 0.03
ICU Ratio = 0.42 LOS^
Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Highland Drive and Carlsbad Village Drive
W
e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Time : 5:00 PM
to 6:00 PM
Date : 6/7/05\
Day: Tuesday
Name :
Totals
1751
Sub-
totals
852
899
North Approach
30
799
70
Subtotals
Total
182
12
119
51
t
North
t 75 33
0
146
328
Highland Drive
222
1
56
r 38
103
39
765
-61
Total
Subtotals
Sub-
totals
865
Totals
1757
892
Carlsbad Village Drive
E
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include
U-tums. U-tums in bold.
LINSCOTT
LAW &
GREENSPAN
engineers
APPENDIX D
SANTEC/ ITE ROADWAY
CLASSIFICATION TABLE
&
YEAR 2030 SANDAG
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Traffic Impact Analysis
JAND AG :: HOME :: San Diego's Regional Planning Agency
1 MEETiMSS j C O N T ft C T
I
I
I
rEgion Newsletter
Help update Bayshore
Bikeway pian
June Board Actions
New report ranlcs
region's sustainable
competitiveness
MTS unveils new buses
MTS announces official
start date for new
trolley extension
I
I
I
I
I
I
7/8 Board of Directors
7/8 Executive
Committee
7/14 Regional Planning
Tectinical Working
Group
7/15 Public Safety
Committee
7/15 Transportation
Committee
Indicators of
Sustainable
Competitiveness: A
Quality of Life Index for
San Diego, 2005 [PDF]
CJ Bulletin April 2005 -
Crime in the San Diego
Region in 2004 [PDF]
TransNet Update 2005
[PDF]
S A N D I 'f i 0 i .
AssoclMlo?! of C5eV0rr?rnaiits
SANDAG provides the public forum for regional policy decisions about
growth, transportation planning and funding, transit construction,
environmental management, economic development, housing, open space,
energy, public safety, and binational topics. SANDAG is this region's
association of local governments composed of 18 cities and the county
government. SANDAG policymakers are mayors, councilmembers, and a
county supervisor from each ofthe region's 19 local governments.
•
A new era in San Dieqo transit is cominql
The new Green Line opens July 10 and will close a
critical gap in the trolley system between the
existing Blue and Orange lines - allowing riders to
travel through Mission Valley to La Mesa via SDSU.
A free Community Ride Day will be held on July 9 from the Qualcomm
Stadium station to the Santee Town Center.
Home I Site Map [ Links j Help j Privacy Policy | Legal | Credits
SANDAG, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101
ph: (619) 699-1900, fax: (619) 699-1905, webmaster@sandaa.orq
Having problems viewing PDF files?
Page 1 of 1
Enter Keyword go!
Land Use and Regional
.Growth
Transportation
Housing
I.con.oii(iics..a^^^^^^
Environment
Boxders
Public Safetv
.DemograpMcs,^^^^^
Data
Maps and GK
Publications
PMJ>!.icJMo^^
lechnicaj^^A^^^
Me.mb.ers
SourcePoint
RideLink
FasTrak
Enter E-mail Address:
Subscribe
View newsletter
I
I
I
I
I ttp://www.sandag.org/ 7/7/2005
rcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 1
3 0 28mi \
SANTEC / ITE
GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDIES [TIS]
IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION
MARCH 2,2000 FINAL DRAFT
PREFACE
These guidelines are subject to continual update, as future teclmology
and documentation become available. Always check with local jurisdic-
tions for their preferred or applicable procedures.
Committee Compilation by Kent A. Whitson
Reviewed by committee members: Hank Morris (co-chair),
Tom Parry (co-chair), Arnold Torma (co-chair), Susan O'Rourke,
Bill Darnell, Labib Qasem, John Boarman, Ralph Leyva, and Erik Ruehr
Additional review by: Ann French Gonsalves, Bill Figge,
Bob Goralka, and Gary Halbert
7
Table 2
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS, LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS)
AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)
STREET
CLASSIFICATION LANES
CROSS
SECTIONS*
(APPROX.) A B C D E
Expressway 8 lanes 102-160/122-200 30.000 42,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
Prime Arterial 6 lanes 102-108/122-128 25,000 35,000 50,000 55,000 60,000
Major Arterial 6 lanes 102/122 20,000 28,000 40,000 45,000 50,000
Major Arterial 4 lanes 78-82/98-102 15,000 21,000 30,000 35,000 40,000
Secondary Arterial/
Collector 4 lanes 64-72/84-92 10,000 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Collector
(no center lane)
(continuous left-
turn lane)
4 lanes
2 lanes
64/84
50/70
5,000 7,000
10,000
13,000 15,000
Collector
(no fronting
property)
2 lanes 40/60 4,000 5,500 7,500 9,000 10,000
Collector
(commercial-
industrial fronting)
2 lanes 50/70 2,500 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000
Collector
(multi-family) 2 lanes 40/60 2,500 3,500 - 5,000 6,500 8,000
Sub-Collector
(single-family) 2 lanes 36/56 ~ ~ 2,200 -
LEVEL OF SERVICE W/ADT"
LEGEND:
Curb to curb width (feet)/right of way width (feet): based upon the City of San Diego Street Design
Manual and other jurisdictions within the San Diego region.
** Approximate recommended ADT based upon the City of San Diego Street Design Manual.
NOTES:
1.
2.
The volumes and the average daily level of service listed above are only intended as a general
planning guideline.
Levels of service are not applied to residential streets since their primary purpose is to serve
abutting lots, not carry through traffic. Levels of service normally apply to roads carrying through
traffic between major trip generators and attractors.
11