The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 11C; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11C; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11C; 2009-08-18Zone 11 3rdAmendment L O C A L F A C I L I T I E S M A N A G E M E N T P L A N CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11 Amendment #3 Prepared For: City of Carlsbad Growth Management Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared By: Document Preparation: Jack Henthorn & Associates Engineering: Hunsaker & Associates Traffic: Linscott Law & Greenspan Amendment #2 June, 2000 Revised June, 2001 Amendment #1 December 14, 1993 Original Approval May 19, 1992 Planning Commission: Recommended Approval on 7/15/2009 (Resolution No. 6580) City Council: Approved on 8/18/2009 (Resolution 2009-213, Ordinance CS-051) Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 ii INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN Amendment #2 OVERALL DOCUMENT PREPARATION: Amendment #3 OVERALL DOCUMENT PREPARATION: JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5365 Avenida Encinas, Suite A 2234 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 (760) 438-3182 Jack Henthorn Bob Ladwig Bryan Bennett ENGINEERING: ENGINEERING: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES O’DAY CONSULTANTS (858) 558-4500 Tim Carroll Pat O’Day David Hammer (760) 931-7700 TRAFFIC: TRAFFIC: LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN URBAN SYSTEMS John Keating Sam Kab Justin Rasas (858) 560-4911 CITY OF CARLSBAD: CITY OF CARLSBAD: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Don Neu Don Rideout PLANNING DEPARTMENT Van Lynch – Senior Planner Don Neu – Planning Director ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Clyde Wickham ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Clyde Wickham Glen Van Peski SPONSORING LAND OWNERS: SPONSORING LAND OWNERS: REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT LA COSTA TOWN SQUARE Brenda Tworoger (858) 268-8901 March 2008 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... I-1 A. DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS I-1 B. ZONE 11 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES I-2 II. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ II-1 A. PLAN OVERVIEW II-1 B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 11 II-2 III. BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................ III-1 A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE III-1 B. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS III-1 C. EXISTING/APPROVED LAND USE III-5 D. DEVELOPING LAND USE III-7 E. BUILD OUT PROJECTION CALCULATIONS III-7 IV. PHASING ...................................................................................................................... IV-1 A. ZONE 11 LAND USE PHASING IV-1 V. ZONE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. V-1 VI. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ..................................................................... VI-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VI-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VI-1 C. MITIGATION VI-5 D. FINANCING VI-5 VII. LIBRARY FACILITIES ............................................................................................... VII-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VII-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VII-1 C. MITIGATION VII-4 D. FINANCING VII-4 VIII. WASTEWATER FACILITIES.................................................................................... VIII-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VIII-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VIII-1 C. MITIGATION VIII-6 D. FINANCING VIII-6 IX. PARK FACILITIES ....................................................................................................... IX-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD IX-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS IX-1 C. MITIGATION IX-6 D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: IX-6 E. FINANCING IX-7 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 iv X. DRAINAGE FACILITIES .............................................................................................. X-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD X-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS X-1 C. MITIGATION X-4 D. FINANCING X-5 XI. CIRCULATION ............................................................................................................. XI-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XI-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XI-1 C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS XI-8 D. MITIGATION XI-35 XII. FIRE FACILITIES ........................................................................................................ XII-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XII-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY XII-1 C. MITIGATION XII-1 D. FINANCING XII-3 XIII. OPEN SPACE FACILITIES ........................................................................................ XIII-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XIII-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY XIII-1 C. MITIGATION XIII-5 D. FINANCING XIII-5 XIV. SCHOOLS .................................................................................................................. XIV-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XIV-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XIV-1 XV. SEWER FACILITIES .................................................................................................. XV-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XV-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XV-1 C. MITIGATION XV-14 D. FINANCING XV16 XVI. WATER FACILITIES ................................................................................................ XVI-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XVI-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XVI-1 C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS XVI-13 D. MITIGATION XVI-13 E. FINANCING. XVI-15 XVII. FACILITIES FINANCING ........................................................................................ XVII-1 A. AREAS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY FINANCING XVII-1 B. TYPES OF FINANCING METHODS XVII-4 C. FINANCING PLAN XVII-6 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 v XVIII. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... XVIII-1 XIX. APPENDICES A-1 CONSTRAINTS MAP A-2 JOINT USE AGREEMENTS A-3 DWELLING UNIT TRANSFER RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORT A-4 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT A-5 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A-6 DISTRICT WILL SERVE LETTERS Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 vi LIST OF EXHIBITS Page EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................. I-4 EXHIBIT 2 ZONE 11 EXISTING PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET .................... I-5 EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 11 BUILD OUT PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART ............... I-6 EXHIBIT 4 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 ......................................................... I-8 EXHIBIT 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 .......................................................... I-10 EXHIBIT 6 SUMMARY OF MAJOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY OWNERSHIP ........ II-3 EXHIBIT 7 ZONE 11 MAJOR PROPERTY OWNERSHIP .................................................. II-5 EXHIBIT 8 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ............................................. II-6 EXHIBIT 9 ZONING MAP ..................................................................................................... II-7 EXHIBIT 10 CONSTRAINTS MAP (REDUCED) ................................................................ III-2 EXHIBIT 11 LFMP BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS - CONSTRAINTS ................................. III-3 EXHIBIT 12 APPROVED/EXISTING LAND USE .............................................................. III-6 EXHIBIT 13 ZONE 11 – DEVELOPING LAND USE .......................................................... III-7 EXHIBIT 14 RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS ................................................ III-9 EXHIBIT 15 NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS .................................... III-10 EXHIBIT 16 BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................... III-12 EXHIBIT 17 CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS ................................ IV-3 EXHIBIT 18 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS ..... IV-4 EXHIBIT 19 ZONE 11 RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS .................................... IV-5 EXHIBIT 20 CITYWIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS ...................... IV-6 EXHIBIT 21 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS ................................................................................................. IV-7 EXHIBIT 22 ZONE 11 NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS .......................... IV-8 EXHIBIT 23 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES MAP ................................................ VI-2 EXHIBIT 24 PHASING OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ................................. VI-6 EXHIBIT 25 ZONE 11 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FINANCING MATRIX ....................... VI-7 EXHIBIT 26 LIBRARY FACILITIES MAP .......................................................................... VII-2 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 vii LIST OF EXHIBITS Page EXHIBIT 27 LIBRARY FACILITIES PHASING ................................................................. VII-6 EXHIBIT 28 LIBRARY FINANCING MATRIX .................................................................. VII-7 EXHIBIT 29 ENCINA WASTEWATER AUTHORITY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ............ VIII-1 EXHIBIT 30 WASTEWATER FACILITIES MAP .............................................................. VIII-5 EXHIBIT 31 WASTE WATER FINANCING MATRIX ..................................................... VIII-6 EXHIBIT 32 PARK DISTRICT MAP .................................................................................... IX-2 EXHIBIT 33 DISTRICT 4 PARK LOCATIONS .................................................................... IX-5 EXHIBIT 34 PHASING OF PARK FACILITIES FOR DISTRICT 4 .................................... IX-8 EXHIBIT 35 PARK DISTRICT 4 FINANCING MATRIX .................................................... IX-9 EXHIBIT 36 DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAP ........................................................................ X-3 EXHIBIT 37 2005 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................... XI-4 EXHIBIT 38 2010 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................... XI-5 EXHIBIT 39 2020 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................... XI-6 EXHIBIT 40 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT .......................................................... XI-9 EXHIBIT 41 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT’S) ..................................... XI-10 EXHIBIT 42 EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ........................ XI-11 EXHIBIT 43 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS ......................... XI-12 EXHIBIT 44 EXISTING PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS .................................. XI-13 EXHIBIT 45 2005 CIRCULATION ELEMENT .................................................................. XI-15 EXHIBIT 46 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2005 .......................................................... XI-16 EXHIBIT 47 2005 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS .................................. XI-17 EXHIBIT 48 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS .................................... XI-18 EXHIBIT 49 2005 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ............................................ XI-19 EXHIBIT 50 2005 ZONE 11 ADT’S .................................................................................... XI-20 EXHIBIT 51 2010 CIRCULATION ELEMENT .................................................................. XI-22 EXHIBIT 52 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2010 ......................................... XI-23 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 viii LIST OF EXHIBITS Page EXHIBIT 53 2010 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS .................................. XI-24 EXHIBIT 54 2010 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS .................................... XI-25 EXHIBIT 55 2010 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ............................................ XI-26 EXHIBIT 56 2010 ZONE 11 ADT’S .................................................................................... XI-27 EXHIBIT 57 2020 CIRCULATION ELEMENT .................................................................. XI-29 EXHIBIT 58 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2020 ........................................ XI-30 EXHIBIT 59 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ........................................... XI-31 EXHIBIT 60 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS .................................... XI-32 EXHIBIT 61 2020 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ............................................ XI-33 EXHIBIT 62 2020 ZONE 11 ADT’S .................................................................................... XI-34 EXHIBIT 63 MITIGATION SUMMARY FOR CALCULATED IMPACTS ...................... XI-37 EXHIBIT 64 LANE GEOMETRY CONDITIONS ............................................................... XI-38 EXHIBIT 65 FIRE RESPONSE TIME MAP ......................................................................... XII-2 EXHIBIT 66 FIRE FACILITY FINANCING MATRIX ........................................................ XII-3 EXHIBIT 67 EXISTING OPEN SPACE MAP ..................................................................... XIII-2 EXHIBIT 68 SCHOOL LOCATION MAP .......................................................................... XIV-3 EXHIBIT 69 SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES WITHIN ZONE 11 ........................... XIV-4 EXHIBIT 70 SCHOOL FACILITY DEMAND TABLE — SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ...................................................................................... XIV-6 EXHIBIT 71 SCHOOL FACILITY DEMAND TABLE - SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... XIV-9 EXHIBIT 72 SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES .............................................................. XV-4 EXHIBIT 73 EXISTING MAJOR SEWER FACILITIES MAP ........................................ XV-10 EXHIBIT 74 ZONE 11 SEWER PHASE BOUNDARIES ................................................. XV-13 EXHIBIT 75 SEWER FINANCING MATRIX .................................................................. XV-17 EXHIBIT 76 WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES MAP ................................................... XVI-2 EXHIBIT 77 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES .................................. XVI-6 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 ix LIST OF EXHIBITS Page EXHIBIT 78 WATER PHASING BOUNDARIES ............................................................. XVI-7 EXHIBIT 79 WATER FACILITY FINANCING MATRIX .............................................. XVI-16 EXHIBIT 80 FACILITY AREAS ....................................................................................... XVII-2 EXHIBIT 81 ASSESSOR’S PARCELS OF FACILITY AREAS ...................................... XVII-3 EXHIBIT 82 ZONE 11 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS, SOURCE OF FUNDS AND FINANCING GUARANTEE ........................................................................ XVII-7 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this document is to provide a plan for supplying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 11 area of the City of Carlsbad, in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. The plan has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 1986. The following document is the second amendment to the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment #1 dated December 14, 1993, in conjunction with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Refer to Exhibit 1 for the location of Zone 11. A. DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS The first step in developing such a plan is to estimate the amount of development that will be allowed in the zone. The types of land uses assumed for the zone are those shown in the Carlsbad General Plan. Exhibit 8 shows the location of the various land uses within the zone. For residential development it is assumed that the density yield will be governed by the Growth Management Control Points as shown below: General Plan Designation • Major Power Line Easements Density Yield Residential, Low Density (RL) 1.0 dwelling units per acre Residential, Low-medium Density (RLM) 3.2 dwelling units per acre Residential, Medium Density (RM) 6.0 dwelling units per acre Residential, Medium-high Density (RMH) 11.5 dwelling units per acre The density yield factors stated above were applied to the vacant, developable residential land in the zone. To determine the developable acreage, the following constrained lands were deducted: • Future Right-of-way of Circulation Element Roads • Railroad Right-of-way • Slopes Greater Than 40% • Significant Riparian or Woodland Habitats • Wetlands • Floodways • Permanent Bodies of Water • Future School Sites • Other Environmental Features In addition, it is assumed that slopes of 25 to 40% may be developed at half the usual density. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-2 Using this methodology and the addition of the existing land uses, it is estimated that approximately 3,906 dwelling units could be constructed within Zone 11. The actual number of units that are ultimately constructed in the zone may vary. However, the estimate is useful and valid for purposes of this plan and is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Growth Management Program, particularly Proposition E. In addition to the residential land uses above, the plan includes non-residential uses for the zone including Local Commercial, Community Facilities and Professional/Office and Government/Office (G/O)-(OMWD Site). Three school sites are designated within the zone; an existing 88-acre high school site and two 10-acre elementary school sites. The plan includes phasing schedules which indicate the property owners' estimated amount of development for each year from 2000 to 2020. The phasing estimates are not binding, and are intended for facility planning purposes only. The phasing schedule (Exhibits 17 through 22) also includes the projections for other zones with adopted Local Facilities Management Plans. The schedules are based upon those adopted Local Facilities Management Plans and are used to determine approximate threshold years for constructing or upgrading various public facilities to maintain compliance with the Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The threshold years arrived at in this way are only projections for facility planning purposes. The actual thresholds must be monitored as development takes place in this zone. Facilities may be needed earlier or later than the threshold years shown in this zone plan, depending upon the actual timing of development. B. ZONE 11 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the demand for public facilities generated by development in Zone 11 based on the eleven adopted Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The following table (Exhibit 2) shows the current status of each facility with respect to the performance standards, given the existing amount of development in the zone. Exhibit 3 shows the status of each facility with respect to the performance standards at buildout of Zone 11. In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as development occurs in the zone, the zone plan contains specific conditions of approval which are listed on Exhibits 4 and 5. Exhibit 4 contains the General Conditions which are applicable to all zones of the City. Exhibit 5 contains Special Conditions for Zone 11. The Special Conditions identify each facility which must be provided, whether it must be financed or constructed, and when it must be provided. The following is a list of the public facilities required to serve development in Zone 11. This list also shows whether the facility would otherwise be provided as Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-3 a condition of approval for a development project or whether a special funding mechanism is needed. City Administrative Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. Annexation into the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) is required. Library. Special funding mechanism is required. Annexation into the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) is required. Wastewater Treatment Capacity. Funding provided by sewer connection fees. Park Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. This is addressed by an agreement between the City and the Property owner(s). Drainage Facilities. Condition of approval of development project. Circulation Facilities. Combination of condition of approval of development projects and Mello-Roos CFD/Assessment District. Fire Facilities. No special funding required. Open Space. No special funding required. Schools. Special funding may be required by the appropriate school district. Sewer. Condition of approval of development project. Water. Condition of approval of development project. Financing for Facilities. Financing for the above facilities is discussed in detail in the Financing Section. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-5 EXHIBIT 2 Zone 11 Existing Public Facilities Summary Sheet City Administrative Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2015. Library Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Wastewater Treatment Capacity Yes, existing facilities meet the Treatment Facilities adopted performance standard. Parks Yes, Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) meets the adopted performance standard. Drainage Yes, drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Circulation No, existing circulation facilities at the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Melrose Drive do not meet the adopted performance standard during the AM peak hour. All other circulation facilities within the zone meet the adopted performance standard. Fire Yes, fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Open Space Yes, existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. Schools Yes, existing school facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Sewer Collection Yes, existing sewer collection facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Water Distribution Yes, existing water distribution facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-6 EXHIBIT 3 Zone 11 Build Out Public Facilities Summary Chart Conformance with Adopted Facility Performance Standard City Administrative Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standards through build out. Library Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standards through build out. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Existing and planned facilities will meet the performance standard through buildout. Parks Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Drainage Existing and proposed drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Circulation Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Fire Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Open Space Existing open space will meet the adopted performance standard through build out. The portion of Zone 11 within the Villages of La Costa Master meets or exceeds the standard per the Implementation Agreement of the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Schools Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-7 EXHIBIT 3 Zone 11 Build Out Public Facilities Summary Chart (continued) Conformance with Adopted Facility Performance Standard Sewer Collection Sewer collection facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Water Distribution Existing and proposed water distribution facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-8 1. All development within Zone 11 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan. EXHIBIT 4 General Conditions For Zone 11 2. All development within Zone 11 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1986, and as amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 11 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 11 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 11 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (CFIP) as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986 and amended January 9, 1990. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at any time. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, and a financial guarantee pursuant to the Growth Management Program for the facility is not in place, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that non-conformance exists, then no future building or development permits shall be issued until an amendment to the CFIP or the Zone 11 LFMP is approved by the City Council, or the deficiency is otherwise satisfied pursuant to the Growth Management Plan. The amendment shall address any facility shortfalls and bring those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with. 8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projects within Zone 11. All future projects within Zone 11 shall undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council. 9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 11. All future discretionary projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-9 Carlsbad Municipal Code. This plan establishes the estimated allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. This plan does not guarantee any specific residential density. 10. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 11 shall be contingent upon the provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. At this time a Community Facilities District has been formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the Zone 11 properties are not a participant in that district, the required General Plan consistency finding cannot be made. Therefore, no discretionary approvals, building permits, grading permits, final maps, or development permits will be issued or approved unless the subject property annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provided by the developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally applicable to Zone 11 that are included in the Community Facilities District. The following activities are exempt from this: grading, minor planning entitlements or minor construction as a part of ongoing agricultural operations, minor subdivisions and lot line adjustments for financing purposes or a Planned Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely at the City’s discretion. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-10 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions For Zone 11 The following special conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 11 and must be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 11. These conditions are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility. Additional mitigation measures specific to the portion of Zone 11 within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are contained within the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-07). CITY ADMINISTRATIVE No Special Conditions LIBRARY No Special Conditions WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five-year period: Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. PARKS If at any time the parks performance standard within Park District 4, is out of conformance with the adopted standard no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 11 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. DRAINAGE A. All future development in Zone 11 will be required to construct any future Zone 11 storm drain facilities identified in the Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities necessary to accommodate an individual phase of future development must be financially guaranteed or provided for prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for any development phase requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 11. B. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any specific sub-drainage area within Zone 11, the developers of that project are required to: 1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-11 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions for Zone 11 (continued) C. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within Zone 11, the developers of that project are required to financially guarantee the construction of the storm drain facilities that are determined by the City Engineer to be affected by the development and required for that phase of development that is proceeding. A. Improvements needed now CIRCULATION B. Improvements needed by 2005 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment – Prior to the issuance of building permits for the area covered by the Villages of La Costa Master or as determined by the City Engineer based on Year 2005 traffic model assumptions, the applicant shall construct or provide for the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road from Melrose Drive to La Costa Avenue, if Rancho Santa Fe has not been previously constructed/realigned. Included within the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road will be the intersections of Melrose Drive, La Costa Meadows Drive and Questhaven Road. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. C. Improvements needed by 2010 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment – widen from four to six lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Avenue. The widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road will include improvements to the intersections of La Costa Meadows Drive, Questhaven Road and La Costa Avenue. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. D. Improvements needed by build out (2020) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection – construct an additional southbound thru lane and an additional eastbound right-turn lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road intersection – construct an additional southbound left-turn lane creating dual-left turn lanes, and add a right-turn lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road/Camino Alvaro intersection – construct a southbound left-turn lane creating dual-left turn lanes, and add a thru lane on the north and south legs. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-12 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions for Zone 11 (continued) FIRE FACILITIES No Special Conditions A. All future development within this zone shall be required to show how it contributes to meeting the open space performance standard and that the development does not preclude the provision of performance standard open space at build out of Zone 11. OPEN SPACE B. Open space compliance will be monitored annually and as individual projects are reviewed within this zone. C. Prior to the approval of any development within this zone, the Planning Director shall be required to find that the development does not preclude the provision of performance standard open space at build out of Zone 11. D. The proposed development within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan is exempt from the Open Space condition per the Implementation Agreement for the Habitat Conservation Plan. SCHOOLS A. Conform to the adopted school performance standard as a prerequisite of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 11 will be conditioned in accordance with the requirements of the State of California and the Encinitas Union Elementary School District, the San Dieguito High School District or the San Marcos Unified School District. 2. Phase A is located within LWD drainage basin 8 and 10. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. SEWER The phases for sewer are explained in the Sewer section and are shown on Exhibit 74. PHASE A 1. Prior to any occupancy within Phase A, the proposed 12-inch sewer line east of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in Camino de Los Coches to the existing 12-inch terminus in Stagecoach Park must be installed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-13 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions for Zone 11 (continued) PHASE B: 1. Phase B is located within the Vallecitos Water District (VWD). Prior to the recordation of a final map within the VWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from VWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to VWD. PHASE C: 1. Prior to occupancy in Phase C, the proposed 12-inch sewer line west of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in La Costa Avenue to the existing 12-inch trunk sewer in Stagecoach Park, must be installed. 2. Phase C is located within LWD drainage basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD.. PHASE D: 1. Phase D is located within LWD drainage basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. PHASE E: 1. Prior to final map in Phase E, the following must occur: a. The pump station and force main must be installed, or an approved agreement by each district must be reached with the Cardiff Sanitation District. 2. Phase E is located within LWD Drainage Basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-14 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions for Zone 11 (continued) WATER The phases are explained in the Water Section and are shown on Exhibit 78. PHASE A: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD). 2. All development within Phase A shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. PHASE B: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of VWD. The 12-inch water line proposed from the existing 12-inch stub in Corintia Street to El Fuerte Street shall be installed as required by VWD. 2. All development within Phase B shall pay the appropriate water fees established by VWD. PHASE C: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD). 2. All development within Phase C shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. PHASE D: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The 12-inch water line proposed in the extension of Calle Barcelona and a portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed as required by OMWD. 2. All development within Phase D shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. PHASE E: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed, as required by OMWD. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 I-15 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions for Zone 11 (continued) 2. All development within Phase E shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. PHASE F: l. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed, as required by OMWD. 2. All development within Phase F shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. PHASE G: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. 2. All development within Phase G shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 II-1 II. INTRODUCTION This Local Facilities Management Plan completes the second phase of Carlsbad's overall Growth Management Program for Zone 11. Phase One of the Growth Management Program was completed with the adoption of the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (1986 CFIP). For purposes of public facilities analysis, the 1986 CFIP separated the City into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones as shown on Exhibit 1, supra. A. PLAN OVERVIEW This LFMP provides a detailed description and analysis of how facilities will be provided in Zone 11 from now to build out of the zone. The plan is divided into eight parts as follows: I - Executive Summary: Summarizes the plan and highlights all conditions proposed by the plan. II - Introduction: Provides an introduction to the format and content of the plan. III - Build Out Projections: Projects the ultimate amount of development in Zone 11, along with itemizing existing development, and future land uses. IV - Phasing: Estimates how and when development will be phased in Zone 11. V-XVI - Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements: Provides a complete description and analysis of the facilities needed to serve development in the zone based on build out projections and phasing assumptions. This is the most detailed portion of the plan. This part is divided into eleven separate sections; one for each facility. Each section provides a detailed analysis of the facility. If a facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a description of mitigation or alternatives, and a financing summary. Each facility section will conclude with adequacy findings. Adequacy findings summarize whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. XVII- Finance: Provides a summary of the proposed method of financing each facility. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 II-2 XVIII- References: Provides a list of public documents used in the preparation of this plan but not included in the Appendices due to the length of the individual documents. All References are available to the public by request of the respective publishing agency. XIV- Appendices: Provides the technical materials used in preparation of this plan. B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 11 Local Facilities Management Zone 11 is located in the southeast quadrant of Carlsbad as shown on Exhibit 1. Local Facility Management Zones 6 and 12 are on Zone 11’s western boundaries. The City of Encinitas is to the south/southwest, the County of San Diego to the east and the City of San Marcos to the north/northeast. Zone 11 comprises approximately 2,252.8 gross acres. Exhibit 6 lists the major landowners within Zone 11. Exhibit 7 shows the location of their holdings. Primarily a residential area, Carlsbad’s General Plan calls for residential land uses ranging in density from Low (0-1.5 dwelling units/acre) to Medium-High (8-15 dwelling units/acre). Non-residential land uses within Zone 11 include Local Commercial, Community Facilities and Professional/Office. Three school sites are designated within the zone; an 88-acre high school site and two 10-acre elementary school sites. The General Plan Designations within Zone 11 are shown on Exhibit 8. The land use zoning within Zone 11 is shown on Exhibit 9. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan, which covers the northern half of the Zone, is being submitted concurrently with this LFMP and is the basis for development estimates for the area covered by the Master Plan. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 II-3 EXHIBIT 6 Summary of Major Undeveloped Property Ownership Map Key # Ownership/APN Acreage 1. Real Estate Collateral Management 1060.8 222-151-80 222-470-23, 25 223-010-12, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 223-011-02, 03, 04, 05, 06 223-021-08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 223-050-49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 65, 67, 69 1. Real Estate Collateral Management 88.1 223-322-02 1. Real Estate Collateral Management 66.5 223-220-71; 255-031-17 1. Real Estate Collateral Management 6.8 223-032-01, 02 223-060-49, 15 223-071-05, 07, 09 2. San Marcos County Water District 4.8 223-021-17 3. City of Carlsbad/Fire Station No. 6 0.5 223-050-66 4. San Marcos County Water District (Reclaimed Water Lake) 18.7 223-071-10 5. Olivenhain Municipal Water District (Water Storage) 2.6 223-071-06 6. Daniel Shelley 80.0 223-061-01 7. La Costa Town Square, LLC 83.0 223-060-31, 32 and 223-050-68,70. 8. Union Oil 0.7 223-060-28 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 II-4 9. Walter Four S Ranch Co. 4.5 223-060-29 13. City of Carlsbad/Stagecoach Park 28.0 223-060-60, 61 15. La Costa Estancia 7.6 255-031-20 16. Encinitas Union School District 9.9 255-031-28 17. Real Estate Collateral Management 12.2 255-031-26 21. Olivenhain Municipal Water District 1.9 26. Shelley 114.6 264-010-32 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-1 III. BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS To properly assess and plan for facilities to serve Zone 11, it is necessary to project the type and intensity of land use as the zone builds out. These build out projections define land use intensity and corresponding facilities demands. The basis for the land uses and build out projections in this Local Facilities Management Plan is the Carlsbad General Plan, as amended concurrently with this Local Facilities Management Plan and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01). The methodology used in compiling this build out projection is consistent with that used in the 1986 CFIP. The methodology is briefly described as follows: A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE General Plan Land Use Designations were plotted on a 1" = 200' base map. A reduction of this map is shown in Exhibit 10. Exhibit 11 provides a detailed itemization of the area calculations. The gross acreage of these areas were determined by computer. Appendix A-1 provides a map at 1 " = 200' scale. The easterly “canyon” alignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road, which was approved by the City Council, is used for the preparation of build out assumptions and facility planning. A detailed study of the alignment and environmental impact report have been prepared for the new alignment, but are not included in this Local Facilities Management Plan. B. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Consistent with adopted City policies and ordinances, development constraints within each area were identified. Constraints that may have existed on land that is developed were not included in this analysis. Constraints fall into two basic categories: 1) full and 2) partial. Fully constrained areas cannot be used to calculate residential density and are considered undevelopable. Fifty percent of the area of partial constraints can be used in residential density calculations. Since development constraints overlap each other, for accounting purposes, constraints are organized in a hierarchy beginning at 'A' - major powerline easement and ending in 'J' - slopes between 25-40%. When overlapping occurs, only the area of the highest-level constraint is calculated for build out projection purposes. It is recognized that underlying constraints exist and that these constraints as well as others will be defined by specific environmental review for individual development projects. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-3 EXHIBIT 11 ZONE 11 - LFMP BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS - CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Acres of Developmental Constraints (1)Full Partial SchoolsGeneral Plan Land Use Designation Notes Gross Acres A B C D E F G H I TOTAL J J/2 K Net Developer Acres C1 41.6 4.3 1.8 0.0 6.1 3.6 1.8 33.7C24.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 4.3 Total C 48.5 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 3.9 2.0 0.0 38.0 CF 9.1 2.6 0.1 2.7 6.4 N2 5.6 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.1 4.1Total CF/N 14.7 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 10.5 U 29.0 1.4 0.2 2.4 4.0 5.5 2.8 22.307.1 0.8 0.8 6.30-1 0.9 0.9 6.2 G/0 1 2.2 1.2 1.2 1.0Total O 10.2 1.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 OS 1 539.9 72.0 6.1 127.0 9.9 215.0 117.2 58.6OS 2 10.1 9.8 0.4 10.2 0.0 OS 3 6.0 1.4 4.0 5.4 0.0 OS 4 12.5 0.0 0.0OS 5 27.0 4.9 0.1 5.0 3.2 1.6 OS 6 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.0OS 7 9.2 1.3 1.3 0.1 0.1OS 8 56.9 6.7 1.0 14.4 2.3 24.4 2.8 1.4 OS 9 36.6 0.8 1.2 2.7 6.4 11.1 2.0 1.0OS 10 4.2 0.4 0.9 1.3 0.9 0.5OS 11 54.7 1.6 1.6 12.1 6.1 Total OS 757.5 87.1 16.8 0.0 131.3 31.9 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 275.8 138.3 69.2 0.0 RL 1 58.9 3.3 3.3 0.0 55.6 RL 2 166.3 4.2 1.8 6.0 24.2 12.1 148.2Total RL 225.2 0.0 3.3 0.0 4.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 24.2 12.1 0.0 203.8 RLM 1 190.8 10.6 10.6 56.0 28.0 152.2RLM 2 102.9 1.8 2.2 1.3 5.3 7.8 3.9 93.7 RLM 3 241.8 0.2 13.1 6.5 3.3 23.1 27.5 13.8 204.9RLM 4 24.0 0.7 0.7 3.5 1.8 21.5RLM 5 49.1 1.7 1.9 0.1 3.7 3.5 1.8 43.7 RLM 6 168.5 3.9 4.4 0.4 0.1 8.8 19.1 9.6 150.2RLM 7 169.8 3.7 2.7 0.6 3.3 10.3 11.3 5.7 153.9Total RLM 947.9 2.0 23.3 0.0 29.0 5.7 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 63.2 128.7 64.4 0.0 820.2 RM 1 13.8 0.8 0.8 3.2 1.6 11.5 RM 2 4.6 1.1 1.1 2.4 1.2 2.3 RM 3 25.0 1.6 0.2 1.8 0.0 23.2RM 4 10.0 2.1 2.1 0.1 0.1 7.8 Total RM 53.4 0.8 4.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.7 2.9 0.0 44.8 RMH 1 11.5 0.0 2.2 1.1 10.4 RMH 2 36.3 3.0 0.9 0.1 4.0 2.5 1.3 31.1RMH 4 22.1 0.6 6.1 6.7 4.1 2.0 13.4Total RMH 70.9 0.6 10.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 8.8 4.4 0.0 54.9 E1 9.9 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 9.1E286.3 0.3 3.5 1.2 5.0 14.3 7.2 67.0E311.9 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 11.1 Total E 108.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.5 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 14.9 7.5 87.2 TOTAL 2257.2 90.5 69.9 0.0 172.7 40.8 12.5 0.0 2.4 0.7 388.3 330.2 165.4 87.2 1202.7 EXHIBIT 11 LFMP Build Out Projections - Constraints Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-4 Full constraints are as follows: A. Major ( 69 kv) power-line easements B. Proposed circulation element roadways C. Railroad track beds or R-O-W D. Slopes of 40% or more in grade E. Significant riparian, or woodland habitats F. Significant wetlands G. Floodways H. Permanent bodies of water I. Other significant environmental features as determined by the Environmental Review process. Partial Constraints include: J. Slopes between 25-40% in grade: only 1/2 of the area within slopes between 25-40% in grade were used in residential density calculations. Also included in the constraint analysis is the programming of: K. Planned school facilities The approximate area and location of school facilities are indicated in the General Plan. The beneficial and efficient provision of these facilities requires a minimum area of land free of development constraints. Consistent with City and school district policy, the minimum acreage identified by the General Plan for school facilities was not used in the applicable sub-area's residential density calculations. L. Habitat Conservation Plan In 1995, the City and the Fieldstone Company, along with various State and Federal government agencies entered into an agreement in order to preserve specific portions of Zone 11 impacted by environmentally sensitive species and habitat. This was subsequently issued to Real Estate Collateral Management (RECM). This agreement (Implementation Agreement) and its accompanying Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) significantly limited the developable area within the RECM properties and required all areas specified as conservation areas to be redesignated as General Plan Open Space. However, the agreement also provided for the shift of dwelling units previously available within the conservation areas to the developable areas. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-5 As a result of the requirement that the General Plan be amended to reflect the Habitat Conservation Plan/Ongoing Multi-Species Plan (HCP/OMSP), General Plan designation densities were increased within the developable areas of the RECM properties to provide for the shift of dwelling units. In order to preserve the number of dwelling units previously allowed for under the original Zone 11 LFMP, the RECM properties were analyzed for facilities purposes under the constraints imposed by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan rather than traditional General Plan designation based analysis. This will allow development to occur consistent with the original build out projections of the LFMP. C. EXISTING/APPROVED LAND USE Existing Land Uses within each area as of 1/1/00 were identified. Residential density as well as square footage and type of non-residential structures were itemized. Exhibit 12 provides a detailed breakdown of these land uses that are existing or approved by the City of Carlsbad. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-6 General Plan Land Use Sub-area Exhibit 12 Approved/Existing Land Use A. Residential: Dwelling Units RLM-1 263 RLM-3 160 RLM – 5 (Existing) 73 RLM – 6 (Existing) 815 RM – 2 (Approved) 131 RL – 2 (Existing) 174 RMH – 2 (Existing) 496 RLM-7 (Existing) 196 TOTAL 2,308 B. Non-Residential: General Plan Land Use Sub-area Project Gross Acres Land Use Type E-1 9.9 Elementary School E-2 86.3 High School E-3 11.9 Elementary School N-2 5.6 Neighborhood Center G/0-1 2.2 Olivenhain Municipal Water District Office TOTAL 115.9 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-7 D. DEVELOPING LAND USE Developing Land Use is a category that defines the status or stage in the development process that exists for a land use proposal or project. The development process begins when a development application is submitted to the City. Various procedures are followed depending on the type of application submitted. In all cases, applications are reviewed to ensure that all City standards are met and conform with all previous discretionary approvals prior to finalizing the projects and issuing building permits. Once the project has received final occupancy, the development process ends and the land use is identified as an existing land use. Developing Land Use was identified by a review of the City of Carlsbad Planning Department development records. A detailed itemization of developing land uses is provided in Exhibit 13. After receiving tentative discretionary approval, a land use is considered approved. The approval is valid until the land use is developed and occupied or the tentative approval expires. Developing Status General Plan Land Use Designation Project Application Submittal Tentative Approval Final Map Building Permits Total Existing RLM-7 Shelly CT 90-03 0.0 256.0 0.0 0.0 256.0 0.0 RLM-7 Colina Roble CT 98-02 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 RM-3 Parkview East CT 85-21 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 0.0 284.0 0.0 35.0 319.0 0.0 Exhibit 13 Zone 11 – Developing Land Use E. BUILD OUT PROJECTION CALCULATIONS Both residential and non-residential build out projections as of 1-1-00 for Zone 11 are shown on Exhibit 14 and 15. The build out projections are calculated as follows: 1. RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS The net developable acreage of each residential land use sub-area is multiplied by the adopted Growth Management control point as follows: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-8 General Plan Land Use Designation Growth Management Control Point Dwelling Units/ Acre RL 1.0 RLM 3.2 RM 6.0 RMH 11.5 RH 19 The result provides the base residential dwelling unit build out projections for each sub-area consistent with the passage of Proposition E on November 4, 1986. Both existing and approved dwelling units are subtracted from this yield to indicate the amount of future residential development in the zone. 2. NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS The net-developable acreage of each non-residential land use sub-area is multiplied by either .3 or .4 as described below. The resultant figures provide an estimate of ultimate land use intensity as defined by building square footage for each sub-area. This estimate is used for facility planning purposes. The Growth Management Program uses the .3 factor to estimate building square footage yields for either 1) unapproved and unimproved vacant unconstrained land or for 2) urbanized underdeveloped non-residential sites. These urbanized underdeveloped sites typically exhibit significant man-made constraints to development. Primary constraints are: a) compatibility with surrounding land uses and b) proper interfacing with existing infrastructure and public facilities. The .4 factor is used to estimate building square footage yields on unconstrained lots which have approved land use projects and have all infrastructure in place. The land use intensity of both existing and approved non-residential development is subtracted from this estimate to indicate the amount of future non-residential land use intensity. Non-residential uses within the Zone 11 area consist of two existing elementary schools, one high school and one park (Stage Coach Park). Zone 11 also has the potential to develop approximately 39.3 net acres of commercial designated land, approximately 8.3 net acres of office designated land and 6.4 net acres of community facilities designated land per the underlying General Plan designation. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-9 EXHIBIT 14 Residential Build Out Projections General Plan Land Use Designation Net Acres GMCP Base Residential Buildout Projections Existing DU's Approved DU's Future DU's Total DU's RL 1 55.6 1 55.6 0 0 55 55 RL 2 148.2 1 148.2 174 0 0 174 Total RL 203.8 1 203.8 174 0 55 229 RLM 1 152.2 3.2 486.9 0 0 262 262 RLM 2 93.7 3.2 299.8 0 0 305 305 RLM 3 204.9 3.2 655.7 0 0 511 511 RLM 4 21.5 3.2 68.8 0 0 64 64 RLM 5 43.7 3.2 139.8 73 0 0 73 RLM 6 150.2 3.2 480.5 815 0 0 815 RLM 7 153.9 3.2 492.3 196 284 0 480 RLM 8 0.1 3.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 Total RLM 820.7 3.2 2623.9 1084 284 1142 2510 RM 1 11.5 6 69.0 0 0 45 45 RM 2 23.2 6 139.2 131 0 0 131 RM 3 2.3 6 13.8 0 35 0 35 RM 4 7.8 6 46.8 0 0 47 47 Total RM 44.8 6 268.8 131 35 92 258 RMH 1 10.4 11.5 119.6 0 0 58 58 RMH 2 31.1 11.5 357.1 496 0 0 496 RMH 4 13.4 11.5 154.1 0 0 171 171 Total RMH 54.9 630.8 496 0 229 725 TOTAL 1124.2 3727.0 1885 319 1518 3722 DU's From Zone 12 179.0 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL DU's 3906.0 3722.0 EXHIBIT 14 Residential Build Out Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-10 General Land Use Designation Net Developable Acres GMP Non- residential LU Intensity Estimate Base Non- residential Buildout Projections Existing Sq.Ft. Approved Sq. Ft. Estimated Future Sq. Ft. C-1 33.7 30%440,392 284,400 C-2 4.3 30%56,192 56,192 CF 6.4 30%83,635 83,635 N-2 4.1 30%53,579 53,579 SUBTOTAL 48.5 30%633,798 477,806 0-1 6.2 30%81,022 55,000 G/O 0.9 30%11,761 11,761 TOTAL ZONE 55.6 726,581 544,567 EXHIBIT 15 Non-Residential Build Out Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-11 3. DWELLING UNIT TRANSFER The build out projections for Zone 11 include a dwelling unit transfer of 179 units from Zone 12. A dwelling unit transfer may be allowed within a quadrant pursuant to the Goals and Policies of the General Plan and Title 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A dwelling unit transfer must assure 1) the overall unit count in the quadrant is not changed, 2) no other property owners are adversely affected, and 3) the maximum number of units allowed by the General Plan land use designations must not be exceeded. The specific dwelling unit transfer consists of a transfer of 179 units from Zone 12 into Zone 11. The unit transfer from Zone 12 is due to the Arroyo Master Plan limiting the number of units below the allowable future units per the Growth Management Control Point. The dwelling unit transfer was approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 3040 on May 16, 1990 and City Council Resolution 90-264 on August 21, 1990, Appendix A-3. The dwelling unit transfer of 179 dwelling units is not included in the public facility build out and phasing projections for the Zone. The excess dwelling units are available for development but additional analysis will be needed to ensure that the necessary facilities needed to serve development in the zone are not compromised due to the increase in build out projections. 4. BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTION The build out population projection for Management Zone 11 was determined by applying a population generation rate of 2.3178 persons/dwelling unit. The build out population projections for Zone 11 are shown on Exhibit 16. These build out population projections are used consistently throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for public facilities. The total number of units ultimately constructed within Zone 11 may vary from the projections used in this plan, without requiring an amendment to the plan if facility requirements are not significantly changed. Sources of variance include the uncertainty of the fire station site, possible density bonuses for affordable housing as well as other undetermined factors. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 III-12 EXHIBIT 16Buildout Population Projections General Plan Land Use Designation Residual DU Buildout Projections Existing DUs Approved DUs Future DUs Population Index (2.3178/DU) Existing Pop Approved Pop Future Pop Buildout Population ProjectionRL 1 55 0 0 55 2.3178 0.0 0.0 127.5 127.0 RL 2 174 174 0 0 2.3178 403.3 0.0 0.0 403.3 RLM 1 262 0 0 262 2.3178 0.0 0.0 607.3 607.3 RLM 2 305 0 0 305 2.3178 0.0 0.0 706.9 706.9RLM 3 511 0 0 511 2.3178 0.0 0.0 1184.4 1184.4 RLM 4 64 0 0 64 2.3178 0.0 0.0 148.3 148.3 RLM 5 73 73 0 0 2.3178 169.2 0.0 0.0 169.2 RLM 6 815 815 0 0 2.3178 1889.0 0.0 0.0 1889.0RLM 7 480 196 284 0 2.3178 454.3 658.3 0.0 1112.5RM 1 45 0 0 45 2.3178 0.0 0.0 104.3 104.3 RM 2 131 131 0 0 2.3178 303.6 0.0 0.0 303.6 RM 3 35 0 35 0 2.3178 0.0 81.1 0.0 81.1 RM 4 47 0 0 47 2.3178 0.0 0.0 109.0 109.0RMH 1 58 0 0 58 2.3178 0.0 0.0 134.4 134.4 RMH 2 496 496 0 0 2.3178 1149.6 0.0 0.0 1149.6 RMH 4 171 0 0 171 2.3178 0.0 0.0 396.3 396.3TOTAL RES 3722 1885 319 1518 4369 739 3518 8627 EXHIBIT 16 Build Out Population Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-1 IV. PHASING The Villages of La Costa Master Plan has limited the number of dwellings units for those portions of land within Zone 11 covered by the Master Plan. Therefore all population and facility projections will be based upon the existing 1,885 dwelling units, plus the 1,352 dwelling units from the Master Plan and an additional 457 dwelling units from undeveloped non-Master Plan areas. Phasing projections estimate when, where and how much development will occur in Zone 11 between now and build out. Although difficult to predict exactly, phasing projections begin to make possible advance planning and programming of public facilities to assure adopted performance standards are continually met. The objectives of phasing projections are as follows: 1. Project estimated demands for public facilities on a yearly basis until build out. 2. Project and establish thresholds when and where public facilities improvements are needed. 3. Projecting facility thresholds allows sufficient lead-time for facility programming to assure that the performance standards are continually met. 4. Through threshold identification allow the City to efficiently and effectively implement public facility improvements. The 1986 CFIP projects residential phasing to be 1,250 dwelling units per year. This projection was based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April 1986. The 1986 CFIP's public facility programming was based in part on this projection. A. ZONE 11 LAND USE PHASING 1. RESIDENTIAL The residential phasing projections for Zone 11 are shown on Exhibit 17. The residential phasing schedule is intended to be used for projecting future need and timing of public facilities. It is a tool to allow the City to anticipate future public facility needs and to budget moneys for their improvement. The projected residential phasing schedule is not absolute. The actual number of dwelling units to be built each year will vary depending on economic conditions. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-2 Exhibit 17 shows the residential phasing schedules of the adopted and non-adopted LFMP'S. Exhibit 17 shows the yearly phasing schedules for these zones. Exhibit 18 shows a similar phasing schedule for the zones located within the southeast quadrant of the City. The southeast quadrant phasing projections are provided to make the review and future update and monitoring of quadrant-specific facilities more manageable and easier to understand. Also, a Zone 11 residential phasing schedule is shown on Exhibit 19 for use in the review and update of zone specific public facilities. Exhibit 20 shows the non-residential phasing schedules of the adopted and non-adopted LFMP’s. Exhibit 20 shows the yearly phasing schedules for these zones. Exhibit 21 shows a similar phasing schedule for the zones located within the southeast quadrant of the City for non-residential uses. Also, a Zone 11 non-residential phasing schedule is shown on Exhibit 22 for use in the review and update of zone specific public facilities. 2. PHASING SUMMARY Both residential and non-residential phasing projections are provided in order to plan for public facilities. The plan provides these projections to establish thresholds, which necessitate the need for additional facilities. The Growth Management Program and the Zone 11 LFMP anticipate that the actual phasing of development in this zone will vary from these projections. In no instance, however, will a change in phasing result in the failure of any performance standard being met. The public facility thresholds established in this plan will ensure that compliance with the adopted performance standards is maintained or no development will be allowed until compliance is reached. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-4 EXHIBIT 14 - SOUTHEAST QUADRANT RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of LFMP's Status Years as of 1/1 6(SE)10 11 12 17(1)18 Total Quadrant DUs as of 1/1 Total Quadrant Population Existing 2000 7688 0 1885 1252 0 1694 12,519 29,017 Proposed 2000 40 0 80 125 0 0 12,764 29,584 2001 40 150 210 125 0 0 13,289 30,801 2002 17 150 210 125 0 0 13,791 31,965 2003 17 150 210 38 0 0 14,206 32,927 2004 17 150 209 0 0 0 14,582 33,798 2005 17 150 166 0 100 19 15,034 34,846 2006 17 150 166 0 100 0 15,467 35,849 2007 17 150 166 0 100 0 15,900 36,853 2008 17 28 166 0 100 0 16,211 37,574 2009 17 0 168 0 100 0 16,496 38,234 2010 17 0 0 0 100 0 16,613 38,506 2011 17 0 51 0 100 0 16,781 38,895 2012 17 0 15 0 100 0 16,913 39,201 2013 17 0 12 0 100 0 17,042 39,500 2014 16 0 8 0 18 0 17,084 39,597 2015 16 0 0 0 0 0 17,100 39,634 2016 15 0 0 0 0 0 17,115 39,669 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,115 39,699 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,115 39,699 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,115 39,699 Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,115 39,699 TOTAL 8,019 1,078 3,722 1,665 918 1,713 17,115 39,669 EXHIBIT 18 Southeast Quadrant Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-5 EXHIBIT 19 ZONE 11 RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTION Totals of Adopted LFMP's Status Years as of 1/1 Zone 11 Total Zone DU's as of 1/1 Total Zone Population Existing 2000 1885 1,885 4,369 2000 80 1,965 4,554 2001 210 2,175 5,041 2002 210 2,385 5,528 2003 210 2,595 6,015 2004 209 2,804 6,499 2005 166 2,970 6,884 2006 166 3,136 7,269 2007 166 3,302 7,653 2008 166 3,468 8,038 2009 168 3,636 8,428 2010 0 3,636 8,427 2011 51 3,687 8,546 2012 15 3,702 8,580 2013 12 3,714 8,608 2014 8 3,722 8,627 2015 0 3,722 8,627 2016 0 3,722 8,627 2017 0 3,722 8,627 2018 0 3,722 8,627 2019 0 3,722 8,627 2020 0 3,722 8,627 TOTAL 3,722 3,722 8,627 EXHIBIT 19 Zone 11 Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-7 Exhibit 21 Southeast Quadrant Non-Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of LFMP's Status Years as of 1/1 6(SE)10 11 12 17(1)18 Total Quadrant Non-Residential as of 1/1 Existing 2000 0 0 344 11,001 0 0 11,345 Proposed 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,345 2001 0 0 56,192 0 0 740,333 807,870 2002 0 56,954 0 30,000 0 740,333 1,635,157 2003 0 56,955 0 0 44,280 740,334 2,476,726 2004 0 56,955 83,635 0 44,280 0 2,661,596 2005 0 56,955 53,579 0 44,280 0 2,816,410 2006 0 0 11,761 0 0 0 2,828,171 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,828,171 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,828,171 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,828,171 2010 0 0 228,300 0 0 0 3,056,471 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,056,471 2012 0 0 111,100 0 0 0 3,167,571 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167,571 TOTAL 0 227,819 544,911 41,001 132,840 2,221,000 3,167,571 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IV-8 Status Year as of 1/1 Zone 11 Sq. Ft. Existing 2000 344 2000 - 2001 56,192 2002 - 2003 - 2004 83,635 2005 53,579 2006 11,761 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 228,300 2011 - 2012 111,100 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - Total 544,911 Exhibit 22 Zone 11 Non-Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 V-1 V. ZONE REQUIREMENTS The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 addresses eleven separate facilities at three levels of analysis. Level of Analysis Facility Citywide Quadrant a. An illustrative map showing facilities discussed in the section and district boundaries; Zone City Admin. Facilities X Library X Wastewater Treatment Capacity X Park X Drainage X Circulation X Fire X Open Space X Schools X Sewer Collection X Water Distribution X Each of these facilities is evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance standard. For each facility, the following is provided: b. The adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times as development occurs; c. A detailed facility adequacy and planning analysis; d. A list of conditions necessary to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard; e. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing mechanisms. Citywide facilities (City Administrative, Library, and Wastewater Treatment) have been analyzed in the 1986 CFIP. Analyses of these facilities are also included in this Local Facilities Management Plan to verify compliance with the 1986 CFIP or to suggest alternatives that assure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This plan shows how each adopted performance standard will be complied with as development occurs within Zone 11. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services. The plan also includes a complete facility phasing schedule which is linked to public facility demands within the zone. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-1 VI. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD 1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis provides an inventory of existing and programmed City Administrative Facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. These facilities include both permanent and temporary structures. This analysis projects the build out demand for City Administrative Facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Exhibit 23 shows the location of the existing and future City Administrative Facilities. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out City Administrative Demand: Citywide projected population and Zone 11 projected population comes from Exhibit 17. Performance Projected Standard Population Demand (Sq.Ft.) Existing (1/1/00) Citywide 83,420 66,736 Zone 11 4,369 3,495 Build Out Citywide (2020) 112,284 89,827 Zone 11 (2020) 8,627 6,901 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-3 b. Inventory of Existing City Administrative Facilities: The existing City Administrative Facilities owned or leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January 1, 2000 are: Permanent Temporary Leased (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) Civic Center (1200 Carlsbad Village Drive) Main Building 12,899 Redevelopment 3,200 (2965 B Roosevelt) Administrative Services & Community Development (1635 Faraday): 62,000 Public Safety and Service Center (I) (2560 Orion Way): Police and Fire 53,700 Vehicle Maintenance 10,358 Water District Office 18,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ SUB TOTAL 156,957 0 3,200 TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES 160,157 Existing City Administrative Facilities as of January 1, 2000 exceed the performance standard. However, 2.6 percent of the total square footage is leased. If the leases are terminated, thereby reducing existing City Administrative Facilities, this analysis would need to be re-done to assess compliance with the adopted performance standard. If compliance was not being maintained, all residential development in the City would be stopped until the appropriate mitigation could be implemented. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-4 c. Inventory of Approved Future City Administrative Facilities: The adopted 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Program1 Facility funds the following City Administrative Facilities for construction: Sq. Feet Funding Year Cost Source Public Works Center 62,000 ’01-‘02 $15,825,000 CFD/ Sewer/ Water Repl New City Hall 96,000 ’05-‘10 $26,612,000 CFD No other City Administrative Facilities are identified within the City's adopted CIP. Existing City Administrative Facilities plus those scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted 2001-2002 CIP are as follows: Permanent Temporary Leased (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) Existing 156,957 0 3,200 2000-2001 CIP 62,000 ------- ------- ------- SUBTOTAL 218,957 0 3,200 =============================================== TOTAL FACILITIES 222,157 2. PHASING The citywide residential phasing projections in Exhibit 17 are incorporated into Exhibit 24. Exhibit 24 projects the adequacy of City Administrative Facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 24 shows that City Administrative Facilities currently meet the performance standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard through build out. 1The adopted 2001-2002 CIP cost figures include the adopted Mello-Roos Community Facilities District projects and revenues. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-5 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone 11's demand on City Administrative Facilities as of 1-1- 00 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being conformed to and is projected to conform through build out. The yearly monitoring program will assure that the adopted performance standard is complied with through build out. In the event that the yearly monitoring program shows the adopted performance standard is not being met at any time, or that a financial guarantee for needed facilities is not in place, development in Zone 11 will be stopped until the City Council takes action to finance and construct additional Administrative Facilities. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 No special conditions. D. FINANCING A combination of Sewer Fees, Water Fees and the Citywide Mello Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) will be used to fund the following projects: Public Service Center $15,825,000 (CFD/Sewer/Water) City Hall - Future $26,612,000 (CFD) ----------- TOTAL $42,437,000 Zone 11 will contribute to the funding of City Administration Facilities through the payment of Sewer Fees, Water Fees and participation in the Citywide Mello- Roos Community Facilities District. Other than these standard contributions, no special financing mechanisms for City Administrative Facilities will be required as a condition of development within Zone 11. Exhibit 25 shows a facility-financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-6 EXHIBIT 24 Phasing of City Administrative Facilities Residential Dwelling Units Phasing Adequacy Analysis Status Years as of 1/1 In Other Zones In Zone 11 In Total Zones Zones Population Zones Demand Projected Citywide Admin Supply Projected Adequacy/ (Inadequacy) Existing 2000 34,106 1885 35,991 83,420 125,130 222,157 97,027 Proposed 2000 946 80 1,026 85,798 128,697 222,157 93,460 2001 1,058 210 1,268 88,737 133,105 222,157 89,052 2002 890 210 1,100 91,287 136,930 222,157 85,227 2003 753 210 963 93,519 140,278 222,157 81,879 2004 723 209 932 95,679 143,518 222,157 78,639 2005 645 166 811 97,559 146,338 222,157 75,819 2006 653 166 819 99,457 149,185 222,157 72,972 2007 574 166 740 101,172 151,758 222,157 70,399 2008 487 166 653 102,685 154,028 222,157 68,129 2009 480 168 648 104,187 156,281 222,157 65,876 2010 487 80 567 105,502 158,253 222,157 63,904 2011 446 52 498 106,656 159,984 222,157 62,173 2012 446 15 461 107,725 161,587 222,157 60,570 2013 446 12 458 108,786 163,179 222,157 58,978 2014 389 0 389 109,688 164,532 222,157 57,625 2015 302 0 302 110,388 165,582 222,157 56,575 2016 311 0 311 111,109 166,663 222,157 55,494 2017 281 0 281 111,760 167,640 222,157 54,517 2018 176 0 176 112,168 168,252 222,157 53,905 2019 136 0 136 112,483 168,725 222,157 53,432 2020 15 - 15 112,518 168,777 222,157 53,380 TOTAL 44,750 3,795 48,545 112,518 168,777 222,157 53,380 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VI-7 EXHIBIT 25 Zone 11 City Administrative Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes City Administration 1. Central Maintenance and Warehouse Facility 62,000 sf $2,200,000 2001-2002 Sewer -- Design/Construction $9,025,000 2000-2002 CFD (1) -- Design/Construction $4,600,000 2001-2002 Water Repl 2. New City Hall 96,000 sf $26,612,000 2005-2010 CFD (1) TOTAL CITY ADMINISTRATION COSTS $42,437,000 Notes:(1) CFD = Community Facilities District Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-1 VII. LIBRARY FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis provides an inventory of existing and approved library facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. This analysis projects the build out demand for library facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Future citywide library facility demand is projected based on the 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program, adopted LFMP's and Zone 11 LFMP's projections. Exhibit 26 shows the location of existing and future library facilities. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Library Demand: Citywide projected population and Zone 11 projected population comes from Exhibit 17. Performance Projected Standard Population Demand (Sq.Ft.) Existing (1/1/00) Citywide 83,420 66,736 Zone 11 4,369 3,495 Build Out Citywide (2020) 112,284 89,827 Zone 11 (2020) 8,627 6,901 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-3 b. Inventory of Existing Library Facilities: Existing library facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January 1, 2000 are the following: Owned Leased Facility (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) Cole Library (1200 Carlsbad Village Drive) 24,600 0 Adult Learning Center (1207 Carlsbad Village Drive) 1,300 Centro (3333 Harding Street) 900 South Carlsbad Library (1775 Dove Lane) 64,000 0 Warehouse 0 2,060 (2075 Corte de Nogal) ———— ———— TOTAL 88,600 4,260 TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES 92,860 c. Inventory of Approved Future Library Facilities: Cole Library Build Out Expansion: The 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program shows funds for construction of the Cole Library Expansion in 2005+. This expansion will provide approximately 20,500 square feet of additional library space. The following is a summary of the 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program1 1The 2000-2001 CIP includes the recently adopted Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) projects and revenues. funding allocation for library facilities: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-4 Cole Library Expansion - Build Out: Description Funding Year Cost Expansion 2005+ $12.9 million 2. PHASING To assess when the threshold for future library facilities will be reached, the phasing projections on Exhibit 17 are used. These phasing projections are incorporated into Exhibit 27. Exhibit 27 projects the adequacy of library facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 27 shows that library facilities currently meet the performance standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard until build out. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone 11's demand on library facilities as of 1/l/00 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being conformed to and is projected to conform through build out. The yearly monitoring program will assure that the adopted performance standard is complied with through build out. In the event that the yearly monitoring program shows the adopted performance standard is not being met at any time, or that a financial guarantee for needed facilities is not in place, development in Zone 11 will be stopped until the City Council takes action to finance and construct additional library facilities. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 No special conditions. D. FINANCING Cole Library: The Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District includes $4,608,000 and the Public Facilities Fees includes $8,320,000 for the construction of the Cole Library build out expansion in 2005+. This will provide an additional 20,555 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-5 square feet of library space at the existing library on 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive for a total of 45,155 square feet. Exhibit 28 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-6 EXHIBIT 27 Library Facilities Phasing EXHIBIT 27 - PHASING OF LIBRARY FACILITIES Residential Dwelling Units Phasing Adequacy Analysis Status Years as of 1/1 In Other Zones In Zone 11 In Total Zones Zones Population Zones Demand Projected Citywide Library Supply Projected Adequacy/ (Inadequacy) Existing 2000 34,106 1885 35,991 83,420 66,736 88,600 21,864 Proposed 2000 946 80 1,026 85,798 68,638 88,600 19,962 2001 1,058 210 1,268 88,737 70,990 88,600 17,610 2002 890 210 1,100 91,287 73,029 88,600 15,571 2003 753 210 963 93,519 74,815 88,600 13,785 2004 723 209 932 95,679 76,543 109,155 32,612 2005 645 166 811 97,559 78,047 109,155 31,108 2006 653 166 819 99,457 79,565 109,155 29,590 2007 574 166 740 101,172 80,938 109,155 28,217 2008 487 166 653 102,685 82,148 109,155 27,007 2009 480 168 648 104,187 83,350 109,155 25,805 2010 567 0 567 105,502 84,402 109,155 24,753 2011 447 51 498 106,656 85,325 109,155 23,830 2012 433 28 461 107,725 86,180 109,155 22,975 2013 446 12 458 108,786 87,029 109,155 22,126 2014 389 0 389 109,688 87,750 109,155 21,405 2015 302 0 302 110,388 88,310 109,155 20,845 2016 311 0 311 111,109 88,887 109,155 20,268 2017 281 0 281 111,760 89,408 109,155 19,747 2018 176 0 176 112,168 89,734 109,155 19,421 2019 136 0 136 112,483 89,987 109,155 19,168 2020 15 - 15 112,518 90,014 109,155 19,141 TOTAL 44,818 3,727 48,545 112,518 90,014 109,155 19,141 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VII-7 EXHIBIT 28 Library Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes Library Facilities1. Cole Library Build Out Expansion 20,555 sf $12,928,000 2005+CFD / PFF (1)(2) TOTAL LIBRARY COSTS $12,928,000 Notes: (1) PFF = Public Facility Fees (2) CFD = Community Facilities District Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VIII-1 VIII. WASTEWATER FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer treatment plant capacity is adequate for at least a five-year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS 1. INVENTORY Wastewater Treatment in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: The City of Carlsbad Sewer Service District CSSD), Leucadia Wastewater District (LWD) and Vallecitos Water District as shown on Exhibit 29. Wastewater Treatment is provided primarily at the Encina Wastewater Authority (EWA) and also at satellite treatment facilities. Ownership as well as wastewater treatment capacity of the EWA is shared on a percentage basis by six independent sewer districts. Exhibit 29 lists the six agencies and their permitted treatment capacity to the EWA as follows: EXHIBIT 29 Encina Wastewater Authority Capacity Analysis1 Agency Capacity at Encina WPCF (MGD)Existing Flow (MGD) Remaining Treatment Capacity Notes:(1) Vista 8.05 6.49 1.56 Carlsbad 9.24 6.31 2.93 Buena 2.26 1.27 0.99 Vallecitos 7.54 4.59 2.95 Leucadia 7.11 4.06 3.05 Encinitas 1.80 0.96 0.84 TOTAL 36.00 23.68 12.32 Note: 1. From November 2000 Encina Flow and EDU Report Currently, the EWA has capacity to treat 36.0 million gallons per day (MGD). Ultimately, this facility will be able to treat up to 54 MGD. As shown below, the two sewer districts which provide wastewater treatment Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VIII-2 to their respective sewer service areas within Zone 11 (LWD and VWD) own limited treatment capacity at the EWA as well as capacity in smaller localized satellite treatment facilities: Leucadia Wastewater District: Encina Capacity 7.11 MGD Gafner Satellite Facility 0.75 1 MGD TOTAL CAPACIY 7.86 MGD 1 Currently operating only as a tertiary facility Vallecitos Water District: Encina Capacity 7.54 MGD Meadowlark Satellite Treatment Capacity 2.0 MGD TOTAL CAPACITY 9.54 MGD Capacity at the EWA is separated into two categories: Treatment capacity and outfall capacity. This analysis will deal primarily with treatment capacity. The Encina Ocean Outfall is a drainage line that transports the treated sewage (effluent) from the EWA and satellite facilities and discharges approximately 8,900 feet into the Pacific Ocean. Currently, the Encina Ocean Outfall system has sufficient capacity to dispose of the estimated peak flows with an average flow of 38 million gallons per day (MGD) capacity. The outfall capacity is shared by six sewer districts and is projected to provide sufficient capacity to the year 2010. Outfall capacity, just as treatment capacity, is shared on a percentage basis by the six sewer service districts. a. Existing Facilities: Leucadia Wastewater District Two sources of wastewater treatment capacity are available to LWD: EWA and LWD Gafner Water Reclamation Plant (GWRP). Disposal of effluent for both plants is through the Encina Ocean Outfall. The LWD's wastewater is conveyed to the outfall in two ways. The first involves pumping raw sewage and wastewater to Encina for treatment and subsequent disposal to the ocean outfall. The second involves pumping effluent from the Gafner plant through a 12 and 14-inch effluent pipeline (failsafe pipeline) directly to the ocean outfall where it is blended with Encina effluent and effluent from the other satellite reclamation plants. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VIII-3 For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the Gafner plant will remain at the present capacity of 0.75 MGD and that no new treatment facilities will be constructed within the LWD service area. Therefore, all additional treatment capacity is projected to be obtained at the EWA. This assumption can always be modified in the future if, for instance, it is deemed appropriate to increase the capacity of the Gafner plant as a result of increased demand for reclaimed water. LWD is also currently looking at the possibility of treating secondary effluent from EWA for local irrigation water therefore leaving only the tertiary treatment operational. The district is currently reviewing this scenario and has not set any type of timeframe. Vallecitos Water District Vallecitos Water District also utilizes two treatment plant facilities, 1) EWA, and 2) Meadowlark Treatment Plant. Primary treatment capacity is provided through the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility. VWD currently owns 7.54 MGD of treatment capacity. The Meadowlark Treatment Plant currently has the ability to treat 2.0 MGD of sewage with an ultimate capacity of 4.0 MGD. Reclaimed Water LWD and VWD presently have an active program to supply reclaimed water. VCWD provides wholesale-reclaimed water to the City of Carlsbad. The City of Carlsbad services retail customers that include the La Costa Golf Course, Aviara Golf Course, the Palomar Airport Road Corridor, and portions of I-5. LWD provides retail reclaimed water to the La Costa Golf Course and also provides wholesale reclaimed water to the City of Carlsbad. 2. PHASING a. Phasing and Service Demand Wastewater treatment service area population projections for the EWA service district is depicted in the following chart: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VIII-4 ENCINA WASTEWATER AUTHORITY PLAN SEWER SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS2 Vista Year Service 2000 2005 2010 3 Vista 60,600 64,300 68,100 Carlsbad 81,500 94,000 106,500 Buena 24,100 26,600 29,100 4 Vallecitos 6,100 6,100 6,100 5 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS 61,500 73,000 84,500 Leucadia 74,000 83,000 92,000 Encinitas 16,600 18,400 20,200 TOTAL 324,400 365,400 406,500 Leucadia Wastewater District Currently, LWD has adequate treatment capacity at the EWA to handle existing sewer need for their service area until the year 2010. Vallecitos Water District Currently, VWD has adequate treatment capacity at the EWA and Meadowlark Reclamation Facility to handle existing sewer need for their service area until the year 2010. 2 From Encina Water Pollution Control Facility 2020 Facilities Plan 3 Includes portion of Oceanside served by Vista 4 Portion of the City of Vista within the Buena Sanitation District service area 5 Includes projected CSUSM populations Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 VIII-6 C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five-year period: Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. D. FINANCING Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. Carlsbad Sewer Service District, Leucadia Wastewater District and Vallecitos Water District have projected Capital Improvement funds to provide for needed facilities. Exhibit 31 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options. EXHIBIT 31 Waste Water Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Wastewater Facilities Plant Rehabilitation $2,747,708 2000+Sewer Repl Flow Equalization Project $5,018,856 2001-2010 Sewer Fees Encina Phase V Expansion $6,520,343 2000-2002 Sewer Fees TOTAL WASTEWATER COSTS $14,286,907 Note: Estimated costs based on the "2000-2001 to Buildout Capital Improvement Program" Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-1 IX. PARK FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1000 population within the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 11 is located in Park District 4 as shown on Exhibit 32. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand: The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit 17. Performance Projected Standard Population Demand (acre) Existing (1/1/00) Park District 4 29,017 87.05 Zone 11 4,369 13.11 Build Out Park District 4 (2020) 39,604 118.81 Zone 11 (2020) 8,627 25.88 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-3 b. Inventory of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4: The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 33. These are the following: Community Parks Type Ownership Acres La Costa Canyon Active City 12.34 Stagecoach Active City 28.0 Leo Carillo Active City 26.9 Subtotal 67.24 Special Use Areas Type Ownership Acres Cadencia Active City 2.0 El Fuerte Active City 3.6 La Costa Heights Elementary1 Elementary (Levante Elem.) Active EUESD 5.4 La Costa Meadows 2 1An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-2. 2An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-2. (Fuerte Elem.) Active SMUSD 2.0 ----------- Subtotal 13.0 ====== TOTAL EXISTING PARK FACILITIES 80.24 In addition, the adopted 1996 Parks Agreement between Real Estate Collateral Management (RECM) and the City of Carlsbad maintain an irrevocable offer of dedication for 32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located within Zone 10. This dedication/acquisition of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-4 c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 33. The following parks are listed in the inventory but are scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted 2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan: Future Community Parks Type Ownership Acres Alga Norte Park Active City 34.4 Veterans Memorial Park Act./Passive City 25.0 (Citywide Park: 25% credit per Quadrant) --------- TOTAL FUTURE PARK FACILITIES 59.4 d. Projected Build Out Adequacy/Inadequacy of Park Facilities: 80.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The 59.4 acres of projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 2000- 2001 CIP. Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for construction prior to build out, the projected build out adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as follows: Existing Facilities 80.24 acres Proposed Future Facilities +59.4 acres Total Build Out Park Facilities 139.64 acres Park District 4 Build Out Demand -119.07 acres Projected Park District 4 Adequacy +20.57 acres Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-6 2. PHASING Exhibit 34 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park District 4 population projections. Exhibit 34 shows that existing park facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build out with the proposed mitigation. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through build out with the proposed mitigation. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 11 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: In addition to the community parks and joint use areas listed in the existing and projected inventory, the following schools could possibly enter into joint use agreements with the City of Carlsbad when the schools are constructed: Potential Joint Use Areas Type Ownership Acres El Camino Creek Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 Camino De Los Coches Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 La Costa Canyon High Active SDHSD 10.0 La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0 TOTAL 22.0 It is not proposed that these schools be used towards fulfilling the parks requirement in the southeast quadrant. It is however, acknowledged that these schools, when operational, could become joint use areas upon written joint use agreements between the respective school district and the City of Carlsbad available to the public. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-7 E. FINANCING The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 2000-2001 fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4: Park Project 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-05 2005-10 2010+ Alga Norte (Land Acquisition) $4,800,000 Alga Norte (Phase I) $250,000 $250,000 $5,560,000 Alga Norte (Phase II) $5,300,000 Leo Carrillo Park (Phase II) $3,992,000 Leo Carrillo Park (Phase III) $1,703,000 The 34.4 acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance standard because it is scheduled within five years in the adopted 2000-2001 CIP. The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the existing Parks Agreement for the Alga Norte Park and the Public Facilities Fees for the Leo Carrillo Park. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between the City and RECM’s predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 and 1990 to ensure that Park District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City of Carlsbad Parks Agreement. The agreement guarantees the dedication of up to approximately 32.9 acres of park land. This dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. The 1996 Parks Agreement defines the specific reimbursements to be received by RECM in the event that the City accepts parkland in excess of the amount of the total Parkland Requirement, computed as three park acres per 1,000 population. Excess parkland, if any, shall be determined by subtracting the total Parkland Requirement from the amount of parkland accepted by the City. The total payment due RECM for excess parkland accepted, if any, by the City shall be equal to the amount of excess parkland times $175,000 per acre. The Exhibit 35 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-8 EXHIBIT 34 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4 Status Year 6(SE)10 11 12 17 18 Total Phased DU's Total Projected DU's Yearly Population Increase Total Population SE Parks Demand (Arces) SE Parks Supply (Acres) Adequacy/ (Inadequacy) (Acres) Existing 2000 7,688 0 1,885 1,252 0 1,694 12,519 12,519 29,017 29,017 87.05 80.24 -6.81 Proposed 2000 40 0 80 125 0 0 245 12,764 568 29,584 88.75 80.24 -8.512001401502101250052513,289 1,217 30,801 92.4 113.14 20.74 2002 17 150 210 125 0 0 502 13,791 1,164 31,965 95.89 113.14 17.25200317150210380041514,206 962 32,927 98.78 113.14 14.36 2004 17 150 209 0 0 0 376 14,582 871 33,798 101.39 113.14 11.7520051715016601001945215,034 1,048 34,846 104.54 138.14 33.6 2006 17 150 166 0 100 0 433 15,467 1,004 35,849 107.55 138.14 30.592007171501660100043315,900 1,004 36,853 110.56 138.14 27.58200817281660100031116,211 721 37,574 112.72 138.14 25.4220091701680100028516,496 661 38,234 114.7 138.14 23.44201017000100019716,693 223 38,691 116.07 138.14 22.072011170510100016916,798 326 38,114 116.74 138.14 21.42012170150100013216,930 306 39,240 117.72 138.14 20.422013170120100012917,059 299 39,539 118.62 138.14 19.522014160001803417,093 79 39,618 118.85 138.14 19.29201516000001617,109 37 39,655 118.97 138.14 19.17201615000001517,124 35 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.07 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,124 0 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.072018000000017,124 0 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.07 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,124 0 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.07Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,124 0 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.07 TOTAL 8,019 1,078 3,714 1,665 918 1,713 17,188 17,124 0 39,690 119.07 138.14 19.07 Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of LFMP's Adequacy Analysis Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 IX-9 EXHIBIT 35 Park District 4 Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes Park Facilities - Citywide Veteran's Memorial Park 25 ac $16,129,000 2005-2020 CFD#1 Park Facilities - Park District 4 Park Restoration $400,000 2010+PIL-SE Alga Norte Park - Land Acquisition $4,800,000 2000-2001 PIL-SE Alga Norte Park - Phase I 34.4 ac $6,060,000 2001-2004 City - PFF (1) (2) Alga Norte Park - Phase II (50 Meter Pool)$5,300,000 2005-2010 PFFLeo Carrillo Park - Phase II 26.9 $3,992,000 2001 City - PFFLeo Carrillo Park - Phase III $1,703,000 2010+City - PFF TOTAL PARKS COSTS $38,384,000 Notes:(1) All credits and future reimbursements are part of the Parks agreement with the RECM.(2) The TOTAL PARKS COSTS does not include the $2,241,265 to be paid by RECM; however, the TOTAL PARKS COSTS does include the $2,241,265 to be reimbursed to RECM. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 X-1 X. DRAINAGE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The information contained in this report was obtained from the “Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan" (MDP) for the City of Carlsbad, dated March 1994, from As Built records of existing improvements and from the proposed improvements of the Villages of La Costa project. The MDP sets forth the revised comprehensive drainage systems on a Citywide basis necessary to meet the overall long-term needs of the City. As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which are larger than those required from a single development project and, therefore, need to be identified so that the proper funding can be collected for the construction of these facilities. The majority of Zone 11 is located in the Batiquitos Lagoon Watershed. The storm water within this watershed in Zone 11 flows through storm drains, man- made channels, and natural drainage ways in open space areas to either San Marcos Creek or Encinitas Creek. These creeks, in turn, flow into the Batiquitos Lagoon. A very small portion of the southeast corner of Zone 11 is located in the San Elijo Lagoon watershed. The storm water within this watershed in Management Zone 11 flows into the Escondido Creek, which in turn, flows into the San Elijo Lagoon. The information contained in this report was extracted from the Preliminary Design Study for the Villages of La Costa and from the Drainage Plan entitled, "Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Plan for the City of Carlsbad, California," March, 1994, prepared by the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. The Master Plan sets forth the comprehensive local drainage system necessary to meet the long-term needs of the city and should be used as a tool in planning for future improvements. Management Zone 11 is shown on sheet 4 of 4 (Dwg. No. 296-5) of the Master Drainage Plan and is within drainage basin “D”. Few drainage facilities, either existing or proposed, are shown in the northern portion of Zone 11. This is because it is mostly undeveloped, and drainage Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 X-2 facilities will have to be constructed as development progresses. These facilities will be developer financed and will drain to natural drainage channels. The northern portion of Zone 11 drains to San Marcos Creek and will not require detention. Most of the southern portion of Zone 11 drains to Encinitas Creek. One existing detention basin, shown on Exhibit 36, was constructed in anticipation of development within the southern portion of Zone 11. The need for additional detention, either interim or long term, will be determined during final engineering. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing Facilities Existing major drainage facilities within the boundaries of Zone 11 include 6 - 30”storm drains, 6 - 36” storm drains, 3 - 42” storm drains, 1 - 48” storm drain, 1 - 54” storm drain and 2 - 60” storm drains. Also located in the southwestern portion of Zone 11 is a retention/sedimentation basin. Exhibit 36 shows the locations of these facilities. b. Proposed Buildout Facilities The Master Drainage Plan proposed several drainage facilities to be constructed along Encinitas Creek and a tributary of Encinitas Creek. The approximate locations of the proposed facilities are shown on Exhibit 36. The location and size of the proposed storm drain facilities have been approximated for the purposes of this plan. The actual locations and sizes will be further defined as the surrounding area develops and the storm runoff is analyzed according to current design standards. The proposed storm drain facilities within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area are preliminary and maybe altered as a result of final engineering per the development of the individual neighborhoods. 2. PHASING The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or concurrent with development. The watershed boundary covers the entire Zone 11 area and correlate with the natural drainage basin for the area. Thresholds for the major drainage facilities within this watershed can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 X-4 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS All phases in Zone 11 will meet the adopted performance standard for major storm drain facilities. Major drainage facilities will be constructed or upgraded as development occurs so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Detailed studies will be prepared for each phase. The following Mitigation section will outline a program to ensure compliance with the performance standard. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. All future development in Zone 11 will be required to construct any future Zone 11 storm drain facilities identified in the Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities necessary to accommodate an individual phase of future development must be financially guaranteed or provided for prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for any development phase requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 11. 2. Drainage facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any specific sub-drainage area within Zone 11, the developers of that project are required to: a. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan. 3. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within Zone 11, the developers of that project are required to financially guarantee the construction of the storm drain facilities that are determined by the City Engineer to be affected by the development and required for that phase of development that is proceeding. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 X-5 D. FINANCING The Master Drainage Plan (MDP) states that the primary method of financing drainage facilities within basin ‘D’ is through direct developer construction as a condition of development approval. In addition, the MDP provides that a small administrative fee will be levied on development within basin ‘D’ in order to reimburse the City for capital expenses associated with the Storm Water Testing and Monitoring Program. The MDP also states that it may be necessary to establish additional local benefit assessment districts to reimburse developers on a facility-by-facility basis. There are currently no MDP facilities within Zone 11 that qualify for fee credits. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-1 XI. CIRCULATION A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the Zone, nor any road segment or intersection out of the Zone, which is impacted by development in the Zone, shall be projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak hours, nor Service Level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of the analysis was to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 11 conforms to the adopted performance standards. It will also address all Circulation Element road segments and intersections outside of Zone 11 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 11 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This section is based on the Traffic Impact Analysis for Local Facilities Management Zone 11 prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG), Appendix A-5. The report analyzes existing, 2005, 2010 and city buildout conditions (2020). Assumptions were made in the traffic report as to the location of residential development in each phase. These assumptions were provided to the traffic engineer by the City of Carlsbad and the property owners of Zone 11. Based on these yearly projections, the phasing of Circulation Element roadways located within Zone 11 are identified. The location of proposed development within each phase is for planning purposes only. The actual location and phasing of development may affect the timing for provision of Circulation Element roadways within Zone 11. The financial guarantee for the proposed circulation element roadways will be provided, however, the construction of the facility may not occur until the development requiring the need for the roadways are constructed. In the event that it is determined that circulation facilities need to be accelerated or delayed as a result of changes in the location and/or timing of land use development, the timing of the required roadway improvements may be modified without amendment to this plan. However, any deletions or additions to the list of improvements anticipated herein will require amending this plan. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-2 1. INVENTORY a. Circulation Element Roads Within Zone 11 There are seven circulation roadways located within or adjacent to Zone 11. Rancho Santa Fe Road, Melrose Drive, La Costa Avenue and Camino De Los Coches are located within the boundaries of Zone 11, while Alga Road, Alicante Road and Calle Barcelona are outside but adjacent to the Zone. Rancho Santa Fe Road and Melrose Drive are designated as six- lane prime arterials, while Alga Road and Melrose Drive are designated as four-lane major arterials by the City of Carlsbad. La Costa Avenue, Camino de Los Coches, El Fuerte, and Calle Barcelona are designated as secondary arterial roadways. b. Identification of Impacted Road Segments and Intersections As stated in the performance standard, impacted road segments and intersections are those that have 20% or more of the Zone 11 traffic using them. It is possible that certain road segments or intersections will not be analyzed for each study year since the construction of additional road segments may decrease the distribution on a road segment below the 20% distribution threshold, from a previous study year. The Zone 11 distribution is determined by a Select Zone Assignments (SZA) from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea Model. Exhibits 37, 38 and 39 show the estimated percentage of Zone 11 traffic on the roadway system for the Years 2005, 2010 and buildout conditions. The road segments and intersections that are impacted by 20% of Zone 11 traffic are listed below. These facilities were evaluated to determine the geometry necessary to meet the Level of Service performance standards. The intersection numbers are the same as in the Villages of La Costa EIR, which is cause for the non-sequential order. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-3 Road Segments Classification Olivenhain Road: El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road Four-Lane Major Rancho Santa Fe Road: Melrose Drive to Olivenhain Road Six-lane Prime Intersections 11) El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road 18) Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road 22) Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows 23) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road 24) Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Avenue 25) Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue 26) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Camino de los Coches 27) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona 28) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-7 2. PHASING The traffic analysis prepared by LLG is a detailed study dealing with the specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 11. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 11. The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard through buildout. The traffic analysis uses the proposed roadway system and intersection geometrics for existing conditions and the Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 conditions as outlined by the City of Carlsbad. The time increments are used more as benchmarks than actual completion dates. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements needs to be accelerated, or that the timing is premature, the required improvements must also be adjusted to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Existing conditions were determined by performing peak hour counts at study intersections. The Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 were evaluated using data developed from the SANDAG/Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea computer traffic forecast model. The street segment classifications show the peak hour volume per lane of the street segment, the existing peak hour volume to capacity (V/C) ratio, and the street segment Level of Service (LOS) without mitigation and with mitigation. The peak hour capacity per lane is assumed as 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) for the City Surface streets. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 11 and propose a mitigation plan if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance standard. The phasing of development and analysis of traffic impacts will be monitored on an annual basis. However, for the purpose of this study, the timing of the necessary improvements will be presented in the following increments: • Improvements needed now • Improvements needed prior to 2005 • Improvements needed prior to 2010 • Improvements needed prior to Buildout (2020) Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-8 The phasing schedule noted above should not limit needed traffic improvements to the years mentioned. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements has changed, the required improvements shall also be adjusted either earlier or later to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone 11. The intersections were analyzed using an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The calculation sheets are contained in Appendix A-5. The street segments were analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Methodology to determine the operational Level of Service. The performance standard determines that during peak hour a Level of Service A through D as acceptable and a Level of Service of E or worse to be unacceptable. If a facility does not meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an acceptable Level of Service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more thoroughly later in this report. Traffic conditions for existing, 2005, 2010 and 2020 are described below. The Level of Service for impacted roadways and intersections are indicated and, if needed, recommended circulation improvement needs are identified. Existing and future intersection geometric conditions and recommended improvements are shown in Exhibit 64. 1. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. Existing Conditions, Traffic Volumes and Capacity The existing circulation element is shown in Exhibit 40. Existing daily traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 41. One intersection within the 20% criteria area was calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as listed below and shown in Exhibit 42. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 43. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive (LOS F, AM peak hour) No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 44. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-10 EXHIBIT 41 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT’s) STREET SEGMENT DATE 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o Cadencia Street 1999 25,130 n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 1999 26,170 Source: 1999 Traffic Monitoring Program, Valley Research and Planning Associates Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-11 EXHIBIT 42 Existing Signalized Intersection Operations INTERSECTION EXISTING AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 0.53 A 0.56 A 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 1.02 F* 0.78 C 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.57 A 0.64 B 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.65 B 0.48 A 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road DNE - DNE - 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.61 B 0.65 B 26) Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.55 A 0.67 B 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.14 A 0.48 A 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.78 C 0.63 B ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU LOS = Level of Service 0.00 to 0.60 A *Mitigated to acceptable LOS by Planned 0.61 to 0.70 B Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and 0.71 to 0.80 C reconstruction project 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.90 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-13 EXHIBIT 44 Existing Peak Hour Segment Operations SEGMENT LOCATION LANES EACH DIRECTION LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 2/1 1,540 NB 0.43 A 1,192 SB 0.66 B n/o Questhaven Road 2/1 1,320 NB 0.37 A 1,320 SB 0.73 C n/o Cadencia Street 1 1,420 NB 0.79 C 1,220 SB 0.68 B n/o La Costa Avenue 1 1,490 NB 0.82 D 1,160 SB 0.64 B n/o Camino de Los Coches 3 1,410 NB 0.26 A 960 SB 0.18 A n/o Calle Barcelona 3 1,560 NB 0.29 A 1,010 SB 0.19 A n/o Olivenhain Road 2 1,360 NB 0.38 A 1,020 SB 0.28 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. V/C RANGE LOS n/o = north of 0.00 < 0.60 A NB = Northbound, etc. 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-14 2. ANALYSIS OF 2005 CIRCULATION CONDITIONS a. 2005 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2005 is shown in Exhibit 45. The trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Exhibit 46. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 60,610 ADT (30,305 in and 30,305 out), with 3,200 inbound and 2,435 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,170 inbound and 3,090 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 47; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Exhibit 64. These mitigations represent upgrades required with the planned widening of roadways or to identify new intersections. Peak hour volumes for 2005 are shown in Exhibit 48. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 49. The ADT volumes for 2005 are shown in Exhibit 50. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-16 EXHIBIT 46 Traffic Generation Year 2005 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 2,416 DU 10/DU 24,160 8% 3:7 580 1,355 10% 7:3 1,690 725 Multi-Family Residential 554 DU 8/DU 4,430 8% 2:8 70 285 10% 7:3 310 135 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 190 9% 5:5 710 710 Office 7.3 AC 300/AC 2,190 14% 9:1 275 30 13% 2:8 55 230 Community Facilities 6.9 AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 115 13% 2:8 215 860 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3 AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Neg 2% 5:5 Neg Neg Park 3.2 AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 5 4% 5:5 5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 145 7% 3:7 30 65 High School 86.3 AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 310 12% 3:7 155 360 TOTAL TRIPS - - 60,610 - - 3,200 2,435 - - 3,170 3,090 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT’s are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-17 EXHIBIT 47 2005 Signalized Intersection Operations INTERSECTION EXISTING YEAR 2005 AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 0.53 A 0.56 A 0.47 A 0.62 B 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 1.02 F* 0.78 C 0.54 A 0.57 A 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.57 A 0.64 B 0.52 A 0.58 A 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.65 B 0.48 A 0.85 D 0.63 B with roadway widening mitigation 0.64 B 0.63 B 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road DNE - DNE - 0.51 A 0.50 A 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.61 B 0.65 B 0.61 B 0.58 A 26) Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.55 A 0.67 B 0.49 A 0.54 A 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.14 A 0.48 A 0.12 A 0.45 A 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.78 C 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.79 C ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU LOS = Level of Service 0.00 to 0.60 A * Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment 0.61 to 0.70 B and reconstruction 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.90 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-19 EXHIBIT 49 2005 Peak Hour Segment Operations SEGMENT LOCATION LANES EACH DIRECTIO N LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 2 1,460 NB 0.41 A 1,860 SB 0.52 A n/o Questhaven Road 2 1,370 NB 0.24 A 1,750 SB 0.49 A n/o Cadencia Street 2 1,160 NB 0.32 A 1,230 SB 0.34 A n/o La Costa Avenue 2 1,070 NB 0.30 A 1,020 SB 0.28 A n/o Camino de Los Coches 3 1,180 NB 0.22 A 920 SB 0.17 A n/o Calle Barcelona 3 1,270 NB 0.24 A 1,020 SB 0.19 A n/o Olivenhain Road 3 1,950 NB 0.36 A 1,620 SB 0.30 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. V/C RANGE LOS n/o = north of 0.00 < 0.60 A NB = Northbound, etc. 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-21 3. ANALYSIS OF 2010 CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. 2010 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2010 is shown in Exhibit 51. Trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Exhibit 52. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 67,890 ADT (33,945 in and 33,945 out), with 3,395 inbound and 2,835 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,675 inbound and 3,325 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 53; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Exhibit 64. These mitigations represent upgrades required with the planned widening of roadways or to identify new intersections. The 2010 peak hour volumes are shown in Exhibit 54. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 55. The ADT volumes for 2010 are shown in Exhibit 56. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-23 EXHIBIT 52 Zone 11 Traffic Generation Year 2010 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 3,026 DU 10/DU 30,260 8% 3:7 725 1,695 10% 7:3 2,120 910 Multi-Family Residential 668 DU 8/DU 5,340 8% 2:8 85 340 10% 7:3 375 160 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 190 9% 5:5 710 710 Office 8.2 AC 300/AC 2,460 14% 9:1 310 35 13% 2:8 65 255 Community Facilities 6.9 AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 115 13% 2:8 215 860 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3 AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Neg 2% 5:5 Neg Neg Park 3.2 AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 5 4% 5:5 5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 145 7% 3:7 30 65 High School 86.3 AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 310 12% 3:7 155 360 TOTAL TRIPS - - 67,890 - - 3,395 2,835 - - 3,675 3,325 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT’s are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-24 EXHIBIT 53 2010 Signalized Intersection Operations ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU LOS = Level of Service 0.00 to 0.60 A DNE = Does not Exist 0.61 to 0.70 B *Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.90 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F INTERSECTION EXISTING YEAR 2005 YEAR 2010 AM PM AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 0.53 A 0.56 A 0.47 A 0.62 B 0.52 A 0.68 B 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 1.02 F* 0.78 C 0.54 A 0.57 A 0.67 B 0.60 A 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.57 A 0.64 B 0.52 A 0.58 A 0.43 A 0.45 A with roadway widening mitigation 0.34 A 0.33 A 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.65 B 0.48 A 0.64 B 0.63 B 0.71 C 0.70 B with mitigation of roadway widening & new west leg 0.61 B 0.70 B 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road DNE - DNE - 0.51 A 0.50 A 0.73 C 0.71 C with roadway widening mitigation 0.59 A 0.55 A 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.61 B 0.65 B 0.61 B 0.58 A 0.75 C 0.66 B with roadway widening mitigation 0.64 B 0.55 A 26) Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.55 A 0.67 B 0.49 A 0.54 A 0.58 A 0.71 C 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.14 A 0.48 A 0.12 A 0.45 A 0.13 A 0.47 A 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.78 C 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.79 C 0.63 B 0.90 D Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-26 EXHIBIT 55 2010 Peak Hour Segment Operations SEGMENT LOCATION LANES EACH DIRECTIO N LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 3 1,380 NB 0.26 A 1,460 SB 0.27 A n/o Questhaven Road 3 1,440 NB 0.27 A 1,520 SB 0.28 A n/o Cadencia Street 3 2,040 NB 0.38 A 2,050 SB 0.38 A n/o La Costa Avenue 3 1,650 NB 0.31 A 1,610 SB 0.30 A n/o Camino de Los Coches 3 1,380 NB 0.26 A 1,280 SB 0.24 A n/o Calle Barcelona 3 1,490 NB 0.28 A 1,380 SB 0.26 A n/o Olivenhain Road 3 2,140 NB 0.40 A 1,590 SB 0.29 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. V/C RANGE LOS n/o = north of 0.00 < 0.60 A NB = Northbound, etc. 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-28 4. ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT (2020) CONDITIONS a. Buildout Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2020 is shown in Exhibit 57. Trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Exhibit 58. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 67,890 ADT (33,945 in and 33,945 out), with 3,395 inbound and 2,835 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,675 inbound and 3,325 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. Two intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 59, which are listed below. With the recommended mitigation shown in Exhibit 64, these intersections are calculated to operate with acceptable Levels of Service. The 2020 peak hour volumes are shown in Exhibit 60. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road (LOS E AM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road (LOS E, AM peak hour, LOS F PM peak hour) No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 61. The ADT volumes for 2020 are shown in Exhibit 62. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-30 EXHIBIT 58 Zone 11 Traffic Generation Year 2020 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME % OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 3,026 DU 10/DU 30,260 8% 3:7 725 1,695 10% 7:3 2,120 910 Multi-Family Residential 668 DU 8/DU 5,340 8% 2:8 85 340 10% 7:3 375 160 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 190 9% 5:5 710 710 Office 8.2 AC 300/AC 2,460 14% 9:1 310 35 13% 2:8 65 255 Community Facilities 6.9 AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 115 13% 2:8 215 860 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3 AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Neg 2% 5:5 Neg Neg Park 3.2 AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 5 4% 5:5 5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 145 7% 3:7 30 65 High School 86.3 AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 310 12% 3:7 155 360 TOTAL TRIPS - - 67,890 - - 3,395 2,835 - - 3,675 3,325 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT’s are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-31 EXHIBIT 59 Signalized Intersection Operations INTERSECTION EXISTING YEAR 2005 YEAR 2010 YEAR 2020 AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 0.53 A 0.56 A 0.47 A 0.62 B 0.52 A 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.76 C 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 1.02 F* 0.78 C 0.54 A 0.57 A 0.67 B 0.60 A 0.86 D 0.72 C with mitigation of widening and addition of SB lane 0.80 C 0.62 B 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe 0.57 A 0.64 B 0.52 A 0.58 A 0.34 A 0.33 A 0.45 A 0.45 A 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.65 B 0.48 A 0.64 B 0.63 B 0.61 B 0.70 B 0.92 E 0.74 C with mitigation of SB left-turn and right-turn lanes 0.77 C 0.74 C 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Rd DNE - DNE - 0.51 B 0.50 A 0.59 A 0.55 A 0.64 B 0.81 D 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Rd 0.61 B 0.65 B 0.61 A 0.58 A 0.64 B 0.55 A 0.72 C 0.67 B 26) Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe 0.55 B 0.67 B 0.49 A 0.54 A 0.58 A 0.71 C 0.67 B 0.76 C 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.14 A 0.48 A 0.12 A 0.45 A 0.13 A 0.47 A 0.14 A 0.51 A 28) Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.78 B 0.63 B 0.63 C 0.79 C 0.63 D 0.90 D 0.94 E 1.15 F With mitigation of SB left-turn and thru lanes 0.71 C 0.77 C DELAY is measured in seconds. ICU LOS LOS = Level of Service 0.00 > 0.60 A DNE = Does not Exist 0.61 to 0.70 B *Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment 0.71 to 0.80 C and reconstruction 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-33 EXHIBIT 61 2020 Peak Hour Segment Operations SEGMENT LOCATION LANES EACH DIRECTION LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS LINK VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 3 1,980 NB 0.37 A 2,120 SB 0.39 A n/o Questhaven Road 3 2,080 NB 0.39 A 2,290 SB 0.42 A n/o Cadencia Street 3 2,750 NB 0.51 A 2,500 SB 0.46 A n/o La Costa Avenue 3 2,390 NB 0.44 A 2,200 SB 0.41 A n/o Camino de Los Coches 3 1,950 NB 0.36 A 1,770 SB 0.33 A n/o Calle Barcelona 3 1,930 NB 0.36 A 1,800 SB 0.33 A n/o Olivenhain Road 3 2,350 NB 0.44 A 2,150 SB 0.40 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. V/C RANGE LOS n/o = north of 0.00 < 0.60 A NB = Northbound, etc. 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-35 D. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Prior to the recordation of the first final map or issuance of a grading or building permit, which ever occurs first within Zone 11, a financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved by the City. With the following improvements, all analyzed intersections and street segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service. The following mitigation measures are pursuant to the adopted performance standards under the Growth Management Ordinance for Zone 11. Additional mitigation measures specific to the portion of Zone 11 within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are contained within the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-07). a. Improvements needed now b. Improvements needed by 2005 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment – Prior to the issuance of building permits for the area covered by the Villages of La Costa Master or as determined by the City Engineer based on Year 2005 traffic model assumptions, the applicant shall construct or provide for the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road from Melrose Drive to La Costa Avenue, if Rancho Santa Fe has not been previously constructed/realigned. Included within the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road will be the intersections of Melrose Drive, La Costa Meadows Drive and Questhaven Road. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. c. Improvements needed by 2010 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment – widen from four to six lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Avenue. The widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road will include improvements to the intersections of La Costa Meadows Drive, Questhaven Road and La Costa Avenue with Rancho Santa Fe Road. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-36 d. Improvements needed by build out (2020) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection – construct an additional southbound thru lane and an additional eastbound right-turn lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road intersection – construct an additional southbound left-turn lane creating dual-left turn lanes, and add a right-turn lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road/Camino Alvaro intersection – construct a southbound left-turn lane creating dual- left turn lanes, and add a thru lane on the north and south legs. e. Summary Mitigation to the significantly impacted intersections and street segments are summarized in Exhibit 63 and shown graphically in Exhibit 64. With the previously mentioned improvements, all intersections and road segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service to meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XI-37 EXHIBIT 63 Mitigation Summary for Calculated Impacts IMPACTED SEGMENT OR INTERSECTION WITH REFERENCE NUMBER EXISTING 2005 2010 2020 INTERSECTIONS 18) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Melrose Drive No mitigation recommended due to planned improvement by 2005 Realignment & add an east leg with full movements on each leg Add eastbound right-turn lane and southbound thru-lane 22) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ La Costa Meadows Dr Add an additional southbound travel lane Remove signal, restrict westbound movements and add northbound and southbound thru lanes 23) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Questhaven Rd Realign & widen each leg Construct west leg with full movements on each leg Add southbound left-turn lane and right-turn lane 24) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ South Melrose Dr Construct new intersection Add an additional northbound and southbound travel lane 25) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ La Costa Ave Add an additional northbound and southbound travel lane 28) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Olivenhain Rd Add southbound left-turn and southbound and northbound travel lane SEGMENTS Rancho Santa Fe Road Realign & widen to 4 lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive Widen to 6 lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive Note: For detailed improvement descriptions, please refer to text. Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 11/9/00. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XII-1 XII. FIRE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five-minute response time. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY 1. INVENTORY Zone 11 is entirely within the five-minute response time of Fire Station 6, and partially located within the five-minute response time of Fire Station 2, located on Arenal Road. These Stations are shown on Exhibit 65. A 30 mph average driving rate is used to determine the five-minute response time. The five-minute response time begins when the fire truck leaves the fire station. This is equivalent to an approximate 2.5 mile driving distance from the fire station. 2. PHASING Because all future development in Zone 11 is within the five-minute response time of Fire Stations Nos. 6 and 2, Zone 11 will conform to the fire performance standards to build out. Therefore, it was unnecessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in Zone 11. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Zone 11 currently meets the adopted performance standard and will continue to meet the performance standard through build out of the City. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 No special conditions are necessary at this time. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XII-3 D. FINANCING Exhibit 66 illustrates the facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. EXHIBIT 66 Fire Facility Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes Fire Station #6 (Permanent)N/A $875,000 2003-2004 PFF TOTAL FIRE FACILITY COSTS $875,000 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIII-1 XIII. OPEN SPACE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY Exhibit 67 shows graphically the existing, approved and future performance standard open space within Zone 11. Performance standard open space consists of 1) developed open space areas within existing and approved projects and 2) unconstrained undeveloped open space throughout the remainder of the zone. Unconstrained undeveloped open space is land that will remain as permanent open space and is free of environmental constraints. Environmental constraints include: beaches, permanent bodies of water, floodways, slopes greater that 40%, significant wetlands, significant riparian habitats, significant woodland habitats, major power line easements, railroad track beds, and other significant environmental features as determined by the environmental review process. Slopes 25-40% and major power line easements that are improved for open space purposes can count for open space purposes. 1. INVENTORY a. Inventory of Open Space Demand: The performance standard open space required to be provided for Zone 11 is 15 percent of the total land area that is exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land. The total land area within Zone 11 that falls under this definition is 1612.4 acres. Zone 11’s build out performance standard requirement for open space, therefore, is 241.86 acres. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIII-3 Currently, the existing and approved performance standard open space demand is as follows: Developed/ Approved Acres Acres of Required Performance Standard Open Space Existing 174.44 26.17 Approved 218.00 32.70 Total 329.44 58.87 The performance standard open space demand created by existing projects and approved projects in Zone 11 is 58.87 acres. b. Inventory of Existing and Approved Open Space Supply: An inventory of the existing and approved performance standard open space supply is summarized as follows: Acres of Performance Standard Open Space Existing 173.65 Approved 17.22 Total 190.87 The total existing and approved performance standard open space supply is 190.87. The existing and approved performance standard open space demand is 58.87 acres. Therefore, 132 acres of open space are existing in Zone 11 in excess of the demand generated by existing and approved developments. The open space performance standard in Zone 11, therefore, is currently being met. c. Inventory of Future Open Space Supply: 301.4 acres of future performance standard open space are identified within Zone 11. This future open space, when added to existing and approved open space provides 492.27 acres of performance standard open space at build out. The build out Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIII-4 demand for open space is 231.54 acres; therefore, the performance standard open space is projected to meet the demand at build out. This plan fully recognizes that the Villages of La Costa Master Plan controls the exact location and dimensions of performance standard open space provided in this plan. Any significant changes to the open space created by the Villages La Costa Master Plan will require a corresponding amendment to this Local Facility Management Plan. d. PHASING The affected landowners within the Zone 11 LFMP have agreed to permanently set aside existing, approved and future performance standard open space identified in this analysis. Since the Zone 11 phasing schedule does not address the yearly amount of acres developed within Zone 11, no phasing of future open space facilities demand can be projected at this time. As part of the yearly monitoring program the developers of Zone 11 will provide evidence to the Planning Director ensuring that the open space performance standard is met. 2. ADEQUACY FINDINGS As of 1/l/00, Zone 11 has sufficient permanent performance standard open space to meet the adopted performance standard for existing and approved development. However, Zone 11 will require continual monitoring of this open space until build out. For that reason, the following special conditions are being added to this plan. In 1995, the City and the Fieldstone Company, along with various State and Federal government agencies entered into an agreement in order to preserve specific portions of Zone 11 impacted by environmentally sensitive species and habitat. This was subsequently issued to Real Estate Collateral Management (RECM). This agreement (Implementation Agreement) and its accompanying Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) significantly limited the developable area within the RECM properties and required all areas specified as conservation areas to be redesignated as General Plan Open Space. However, the agreement also provided for the shift of dwelling units previously available within the conservation areas to the developable areas. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIII-5 C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11 A. All future development within this zone shall be required to show how it contributes to meeting the open space performance standard and that the development does not preclude the provision of performance standard open space at build out of Zone 11. B. Open space compliance will be monitored annually and as individual projects are reviewed within this zone. C. Prior to the approval of any development within this zone, the Planning Director shall be required to find that the development does not preclude the provision of performance standard open space at build out of Zone 11. D. The proposed development within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan is exempt from the Open Space condition per the Implementation Agreement for the Habitat Conservation Plan. D. FINANCING Funding for performance standard open space will be provided by the property owners of Zone 11. Affected property owners or homeowners associations will be responsible for maintaining open space facilities within their development. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-1 XIV. SCHOOLS A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As shown on Exhibit 68, three school districts will serve students in Zone 11: Encinitas Union Elementary School District, San Dieguito High School District and the San Marcos Unified School District. Exhibit 69 provides a detailed map of the school district service areas in Zone 11. The San Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District have jurisdiction south of San Marcos Creek within Zone 11. San Dieguito High School District serves the secondary students (7-12) and Encinitas Union School District serves the primary or elementary students (K-6). The San Marcos Unified School District serves both the elementary and secondary students north of San Marcos Creek. Since Zone 11 is served by three different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory A majority of Zone 11 is within the Encinitas Unified School District. There are currently four elementary schools within the district. The following table shows enrollment and regular capacity for each school: School Enrollment Capacity La Costa Heights 638 612 Mission Estancia 553 546 Olivenhain Pioneer 802 641 El Camino Creek 657 650 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-2 b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population for Zone 11: SFD Multi Total Units Units Total Rate Population Existing 1,607 278 1,885 2.3178 4,369 Build Out 2,924 450 3,374 2.3178 7,820 c. Phasing The Encinitas Union School District has entered into an agreement with RECM, the major landholder of this area, which provides for the dedication of school sites in exchange for school availability letters. This agreement has been in force for the last several years and has resulted in the dedication of the La Costa Heights Elementary School site, Mission Estancia School site, and the El Camino Creek Elementary School site. d. Adequacy Findings The Encinitas Union Elementary School District currently exceeds capacity at all school locations. e. Mitigation Special Conditions for Zone 11: Prior to the approval of a final map for any projects within the Encinitas Union Elementary School District, the developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements. f. Financing Financing for school facilities will be the payment of school impact fees or the participation in a Mello Roos District. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-5 2. SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory Diegueno Middle School and La Costa Canyon High School of the San Dieguito High School District serve the secondary students from Zone 11 within the Encinitas Union Elementary School District. These two schools also serve the surrounding areas with school enrollment depending on development within the region. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately determine the middle school and high school student impact based solely on Zone 11 projections. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: SFD Multi Total Units Units Total Rate Population Existing 1,607 278 1,885 2.3178 4,369 Build Out 2,924 450 3,374 2.3178 7,820 c. Phasing The San Dieguito High School District's middle school and high school boundaries overlap several management zones within the City of Carlsbad and extend into the City of Encinitas. Therefore, an accurate yearly phasing schedule for the entire district is difficult to project. This LFMP provides the Zone 11 yearly student generation projection that can be used to more accurately assess the number of students generated from this area. Exhibit 70 shows the yearly number of middle school students generated from Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by San Dieguito High School District. Exhibit 70 indicates the high school students generated by Zone 11 and the total capacity provided by the existing high school. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-6 Exhibit 70 School Facility Demand Table — San Dieguito High School District General Plan Land Use Sub-area Res. in DU’s and Non-res in Sq. Ft. Student Generated Rates Existing Approved Future Buildout Projections Exist Approved Future Buildout JH HS JH HS JH HS JH HS JH HS RL-1 55.00 55.00 0.12 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.60 13.75 6.60 13.75 RL-2 174.00 174.00 0.12 0.25 20.88 43.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.88 43.50 RLM-2 305.00 305.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256.20 54.90 256.20 54.90 RLM-3 511.00 511.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 429.24 89.43 429.24 89.43 RLM-4 64.00 64.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.76 11.52 53.76 11.52 RLM-5 73.00 73.00 0.84 0.18 61.32 12.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.32 12.78 RLM-6 815.00 815.00 0.84 0.18 684.60 142.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 684.60 142.63 RLM-7 196.00 284.00 480.00 0.84 0.18 164.64 34.30 238.56 49.70 0.00 0.00 403.20 84.00 RM-1 45.00 45.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.80 7.88 37.80 7.88 RM-2 131.00 131.00 0.84 0.18 110.04 22.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.04 22.93 RM-3 35.00 35.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 29.40 6.13 0.00 0.00 29.40 6.13 RM-4 4.7 4.7 .84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.48 8.46 39.48 8.46 RMH-1 58.00 58.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.72 10.44 48.72 10.44 RMH-2 496.00 496.00 0.84 0.18 416.64 86.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 416.64 86.80 RMH-4 171.00 171.00 0.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143.64 29.93 143.64 29.93 TOTALS 1,885.00 319.00 1,337 3,541 1,458 343 268 56 1,015 241 2,742 625 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-7 Middle School: The phasing schedule for the junior high school to be located in Zone 12 is not known at this time. As future development within Zone 11 and the City of Encinitas occurs, the following option is available to mitigate overcrowded conditions at Diegueno Middle School: i. Temporary classrooms will continue to be added to Diegueno Middle School to accommodate additional students. d. Adequacy Findings San Dieguito High School District is currently exceeding its fixed capacity however; it is mitigating this shortage by utilizing relocatable units. Future school demands will require a new senior high and junior high school. e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: Prior to the approval of a final map for any projects within the San Dieguito High School District, the developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements. f. Financing Financing for school facilities will be the payment of school impact fees or the participation in a Mello Roos District. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-8 3. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The southwest section of the San Marcos Unified School District crosses the City of Carlsbad's boundary to overlap with portions of Zones 6, 10, and 18 as well as Zone 11. Within Zone 11, the San Marcos School District has jurisdiction over the general area north of San Marcos Creek. a. Inventory Within Zone 11, development has not yet begun in the area north of San Marcos Creek which is under the jurisdiction of the San Marcos Unified School District. Therefore, the San Marcos Unified School District is not yet impacted by Zone 11 students. As development occurs in the area of Zone 11 under the jurisdiction of San Marcos Unified School District, students will attend La Costa Meadows Elementary School, San Marcos Junior High and San Marcos High School. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: SFD Multi Total Units Units Total Rate Population Existing 0 0 0 2.3178 0 Build Out 262 58 320 2.3178 742 c. Phasing The preliminary school master plan for SMUSD has indicated a need for an additional elementary school site within the City of Carlsbad. The timing of this school has not been determined, however, the school district is in the process of locating and acquiring a school site. Exhibit 71 illustrates the build out projection for the area within the SMUSD. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-9 EXHIBIT 71 School Facility Demand Table - San Marcos School District Existing Approved Future Build Out Projections K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 RLM-1 0 0 262 262 0.306 0.116 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.2 30.4 36.7 80.2 30.4 36.7 RMH-1 0 0 58 58 0.306 0.116 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.7 6.7 8.1 17.7 6.7 8.1 TOTALS 0 0 320 320 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 97.9 37.1 44.8 97.9 37.1 44.8 General Plan Land Use Sub- area Existing Approved Future Build Out ProjectionsResidential Dwelling Units Student Generation Rates Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIV-10 d. Adequacy Findings All of SMUSD facilities are currently at capacity. Temporary classrooms and re-locatables are being used by the district to provide capacity. The school district believes it will be able to provide capacity at build out, although SMUSD feels it is premature to indicate future adequacy because it is contingent upon the development and implementation of a successful financing plan. e. Mitigation Special Conditions For Zone 11: Prior to the approval of a final map for any projects within the San Marcos Unified School District, the developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements. f. Financing Financing for school facilities will be the payment of school impact fees or the participation in a Mello Roos District. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-1 XV. SEWER FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk-line capacity to meet demand, as determined by the appropriate sewer districts, must be provided concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: Carlsbad Sewer Service District, Leucadia Wastewater District and the Vallecitos Water District. Zone 11 is within the sphere of influence of two Sewer Districts, Leucadia Wastewater District (LWD) and Vallecitos Water District (VWD). LWD serves approximately 1,590 acres of the southern portion of Zone 11 and the Vallecitos Water District serves approximately 530 acres of the northern portion of Zone 11. Exhibit 72 shows the approximate location of the boundary between these two districts. The information contained in this plan was obtained from the master plans of these two agencies. LWD's master plan is entitled, "1994 Planning Study Update, Leucadia Wastewater District", prepared for LWD by Parsons Engineering Science. VWD's master plan is entitled “Update to the Water, Wastewater and Water Reclamation Master Plan October, 1997” by Camp Dresser and McKee. Since sewer service to this zone is provided by two sewer districts, each will be described separately. Developers will request adjustments to the sewer service boundaries that will be processed accordingly. As an alternative to adjusting the service area boundaries, service agreements may be entered into in order to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. The applicable boards or councils must approve the service agreements. 1. LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT a. Inventory The Leucadia Wastewater District provides sewer service to the southern portion of Zone 11. The zone is located within three major sewer drainage basins, two of which are located in the LWD service area and are designated as drainage basins 8 and 10 in the Planning Study. All of the sewage generated by Zone 11 within LWD drainage basin 8, will flow, by gravity, through local and major sewer facilities within Zone 11 to the major trunk sewer in Olivenhain Road. This major trunk sewer ties into a major trunk sewer in El Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-2 Camino Real and flows, by gravity, to the Leucadia Pumping Station near the intersection of La Costa Avenue and El Camino Real. The sewage is then pumped through a force main along La Costa Avenue to the Batiquitos Pumping Station near the intersection of La Costa Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard. The sewage is again pumped through a force main along Carlsbad Boulevard to a point where it assumes gravity flow. The sewage then flows, by gravity, through the Ponto interceptor which is parallel to the AT & SF railroad track to the Encina Wastewater Authority (EWA). All of the sewage generated by Zone 11 within LWD drainage basin 10, will flow by gravity through local sewer facilities in Zone 11 until it reaches the major trunk sewer in the golf course. The sewage will then flow, by gravity, through the major trunk sewer in the golf course until it reaches the Leucadia Pumping Station. The sewage will reach the EWA through the same major sewer facilities from the Leucadia Pumping Station as described for LWD drainage basins. The existing major sewer facilities that are within LWD and the Zone 11 boundaries are shown on Exhibit 72 and are as follows: No. Facility Location Sewer District A 12” trunk line stub Parallel to Rancho Santa Fe Road along the northern boundary of Stagecoach Park LWD B 12” trunk line stub Crossing La Costa Avenue LWD C 12” trunk line stub Crossing Camino de Los Coches LWD D 15” trunk line stub Rancho Santa Fe Rd. LWD E 18” trunk line stub Olivenhain Rd. parallel to Rancho Santa Fe Road LWD Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-3 The existing major sewer facilities that are located outside of Zone 11 but serve Zone 11 by transporting the sewerage to the EWA are shown on Exhibit 72 and are as follows: No. Facility Location Sewer District 1 12”, 15”, and 18” Trunk sewer Through La Costa Resort Golf Course from Gibralter St. to El Camino Real LWD 2 18” and 21” trunk sewer Along alignment of El Camino Real from Olivenhain Rd. to La Costa Avenue LWD 3 Leucadia Pump Station North Corner of La Costa Ave. and El Camino Real LWD 4 24” force main Along alignment of La Costa Avenue from El Camino Real to Carlsbad. Blvd. LWD 5 Batiquitos Pump Station Northeast corner of La Costa Ave and Carlsbad Blvd. LWD 6 Parallel 24” force mains Along alignment of Carlsbad Blvd. from La Costa Ave. to 21” trunk sewer LWD 7 21” and 18” trunk sewer From parallel 24” force mains, crossing the railroad tracks LWD 8 39”, 42” and 48” Ponto interceptor From 18” trunk sewer crossing railroad track to Encina Wastewater Treatment Plant LWD Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-5 b. Proposed Build Out Facilities within Zone 11: The portion of Zone 11 that is served by LWD contains the majority of the major sewer trunk lines in place within the Zone. The LWD Planning Study recommends an 8 and 10-inch line in Rancho Santa Fe Road. The LWD Planning Study does not recommend any other major sewer trunk lines within Management Zone 11. For the purposes of this plan however, two 12” sewer lines are proposed from existing stubs in La Costa Avenue and Camino de Los Coches to the existing 12” sewer line in Stagecoach Park. These two lines will be needed to serve the portion of Management Zone 11 in LWD that is north of the existing La Costa Avenue and east of the existing Camino de Los Coches. The southeast corner of Management Zone 11 is currently within LWD sphere of influence, but has not been annexed into their service area to date. This area naturally drains towards the Cardiff Sanitation District. The present policy of the Cardiff Sanitation District allows areas outside their sphere of influence to annex into their district. For the purpose of this plan, it was assumed that this portion of Management Zone 11 would flow into either sewer district as determined by gravity. However, at the time of development, if this property remains in LWD sphere of influence and is annexed into LWD service area, then a pump station and force may be required to serve this area. The sewage generated by this area would be approximately 0.01 MGD. The location and sizes of proposed major sewer lines are approximated only for the purpose of the Facilities Plan. The exact sizes and locations will be defined as individual projects within Management Zone 11 develops and the sewer lines are designed per the District's current standards. c. Proposed Build Out Facilities Outside of Zone 11: LWD’S Planning Study recommends improvements to the major sewer facilities that are located outside of Zone 11 but are utilized by Zone 11 to transport sewage to the Encina Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Planning Study was prepared in 1994 and since that time LWD has made or is in the process of making the appropriate improvements to their sewer system, as recommended in the Planning Study, so that the increasing needs of development continue to be met. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-6 d. Technical Assumptions Leucadia Wastewater District’s current planning study establishes unit flow generation factors as a basis for projecting the average sewer flows. The average unit flow assumed by the LWD planning study to project average sewer flows are as follows: Land Use Unit Flows Residential 215 GPD/d.u. Commercial 6.25 EDU/acre or 1500 GPD/acre Elementary School 60 students/EDU Junior High School 50 students/EDU High School 30 students/EDU e. Build Out Projections and Sewer Demand The projected build out sewer flows for each sewer district in Zone 11 can be determined by multiplying the build out projections as established in this plan by the average unit flow factors obtained from the Leucadia Wastewater District's Planning Study and the Vallecitos Water District Master Plan. Projected build out x Average unit flow = Average projected build out sewer Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-7 At buildout, the projected average sewer flow for the portion of Zone 11 that is served by LWD is as follows: Land Use Projected # Units/Acres Demand Projected Buildout Sewer Demand RLM 2,624 DU 215 GPD/DU 564,160 GPD RL 204DU 215 GPD/DU 43,860 GPD RM 269 DU 215 GPD/DU 57,835 GPD RMH 631 DU 215 GPD/DU 135,665 GPD N 5.6 acres 1,000 GPD/AC 5,600 GPD C 45.3 acres 1,500 GPD/AC 69,700 GPD O 7.1 acres 1,500 GPD/AC 10,650 GPD G/O 0.9 acres 1,500 GPD/AC 1,350 GPD E 87.2 acres 238 GPD/EDU 20,753 GPD U 2.8 acres 1,500 GPD/AC 4,200 GPD TOTAL 913,773GPD or 0.913 MGD f. Possible Use of Reclaimed Water VWD and LWD have suggested that all the open space within their service area in Management Zone 11 be irrigated with reclaimed water. Potential areas of open space that possibly could be irrigated with reclaimed water include any common landscaped areas. g. Phasing The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facility Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. Phasing boundaries are Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-8 shown on Exhibit 74 and correlate with the natural drainage basins of the proposed facilities within the Zone. There are five separate phases, labeled Phases A, through E, and thresholds for the major sewer facilities within each phase can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The phasing boundaries allow for independent review and development for the sewer facilities within each boundary. Development within one phase is completely independent of the improvement requirements of another phase. However, the districts may require improvements outside of the phase boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development. h. Adequacy Findings The sewer collection system for Zone 11 currently conforms to the adopted performance standard. The Planning Study for LWD recommends improvements to their major sewer system, as mentioned under the section "Proposed Build Out Facilities outside of Zone 11”, so that conformance to the adopted performance standard will be maintained through ultimate build out. In addition to those facilities identified above, one of the following alternatives must be implemented concurrent with the approval of the first final map located within Phase B, as shown on Exhibit 74: 1. Provide service through the existing purveyor, LWD, through construction of a lift station, force main to Rancho Santa Fe Road and gravity back to the south into other LWD facilities. 2. Provide service through an out of basin service agreement between VWD and LWD, and construction of a lift station and force main to other LWD facilities within Phase B. 3. Provide service through a Boundary adjustment, approved by LAFCO, and construction of a lift station and force main within Phase B. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-9 2. VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT a. Inventory The Vallecitos Water District provides sewer service to the southerly portion of Zone 11. The sewerage from the portion of Zone 11 that is within VWD is treated at Meadowlark Wastewater Treatment Plant. The VWD's Meadowlark Wastewater Treatment Plant is located within Zone 11. All of the sewage generated by Zone 11 within the VWD service district will flow, by gravity, to this treatment plant. Therefore, no other major sewer lines that are owned and operated by the VWD were analyzed in this plan. The existing major sewer facilities that are within VWD and the Zone 11 boundaries are shown on Exhibit 73 and are as follows: No. Facility Location Sewer District i 12” trunk line stub Adjacent to Melrose VWD ii 10” trunk line stub “ “ VWD iii 12” reclamation line Rancho Santa Fe Road VWD iv Meadowlark treatment plant and No. 2 lift station Southerly of Corintia Street VWD v Reclaimed water reservoir Approximately 500’ east of the proposed realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. VWD b. Proposed Build Out Facilities The portion of Management Zone 11 that is served by VWD has all of the major sewer lines in place and VWD does not foresee a need for any additional major sewer lines to serve this area at this time. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-11 c. Technical Assumptions Vallecitos Water District’s master plan establishes unit flow generation factors as a basis for projecting the average sewer flows. The average unit flow assumed by the VWD master plan to project average sewer flows are as follows: Land Use Unit Flow Low Density Residential (1-2 DU/AC) 335 GPD/DU Low-Med Density Residential (2-4 DU/AC) 270 GPD/DU Med. Density Residential (4-10 DU/AC) 205 GPD/DU Med. High Density Residential (10-20 DU/AC) 200 GPD/DU High Density Residential (20 DU/AC) 185 GPD/DU Estate Residential (0.29-0.5 DU/AC) 800 GPD/ACRE Institutional/Parks 1,000 GPD/ACRE Commercial 1,200 GPD/ACRE Office Professional 1,700 GPD/ACRE Industrial 1,300 GPD/ACRE d. Build Out Projections and Sewer Demand The projected build out sewer flows for each sewer district in Zone 11 can be determined by multiplying the build out projections as established in this plan by the average unit flow factors obtained Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-12 from the Leucadia Wastewater District's Planning Study and the Vallecitos Water District Master Plan. Projected build out x Average unit flow = Average projected build out sewer At buildout, the projected average sewer flow for the portion of Zone 11 that is served by VWD is as follows: Land Use Projected No. of Units/Acres Unit Flow Demand Projected B/O Sewer Demand RLM 567 DU 270 GPD/DU 153,090 GPD RM 45 DU 205 GPD/DU 9,225 GPD RMH 229 DU 200 GPD/DU 45,800 GPD CF 6.4 AC 1,000 GPD/AC 6,400 GPD TOTAL 214,515 GPD or 0.21 MGD e. Possible Use of Reclaimed Water The VWD Master Plan does not include any reclaimed water system improvements. It is anticipated that VWD will continue to wholesale reclaimed water produced at the Meadowlark Water Reclamation Facility to other agencies. VWD have suggested that all the open space within their service area in Management Zone 11 be irrigated with reclaimed water. Potential areas of open space that possibly could be irrigated with reclaimed water include any common landscaped areas. f. Phasing The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facility Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. Phasing boundaries are shown on Exhibit 74 and correlate with the natural drainage basins of the proposed facilities within the Zone. There are five separate phases, labeled Phases A, through E, and thresholds for the major Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-14 sewer facilities within each phase can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The phasing boundaries allow for independent review and development for the sewer facilities within each boundary. Development within one phase is completely independent of the improvement requirements of another phase. However, the districts may require improvements outside of the phase boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development. g. Adequacy Findings The sewer collection system for Zone 11 currently conforms to the adopted performance standard. VWD indicated that the existing sewer system will conform to the adopted performance standard to ultimate build out. C. MITIGATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11: 1. PHASE A: a. Special Conditions: 1. Prior to any occupancy within Phase A, the proposed 12-inch sewer line east of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in Camino de Los Coches to the existing 12-inch terminus in Stagecoach Park must be installed. 2. Phase A is located within LWD drainage basin 8 and 10. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. b. Financing: The cost of the proposed 12-inch sewer is estimated to be $92,100.42. This sewer facility is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase A. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-15 2. PHASE B a. Special Conditions: 1. Phase B is located within the VWD. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the VWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from VWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to VWD. b. Financing There is no special financing required for Phase B. 3. PHASE C: a. Special Conditions: 1. Prior to occupancy in Phase C, the proposed 12-inch sewer line west of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in La Costa Avenue to the existing 12-inch trunk sewer in Stagecoach Park, must be installed. 2. Phase C is located within LWD drainage basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. b. Financing The cost of the proposed 12-inch sewer is estimated to be $59,100.43. This sewer facility is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase C. 4. PHASE D: a. Special Conditions: 1. Phase D is located within LWD drainage basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-16 LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. b. Financing: LWD will finance the facilities recommended in the Planning Study through the collection of sewer fee. 5. PHASE E: a. Special Conditions: 1. Prior to final map in Phase E, the following must occur: a. The pump station and force main must be installed or an approved agreement by each district must be reached with the Cardiff Sanitation District. 2. Phase E is located within LWD drainage basin 8. Prior to the recordation of a final map within the LWD sewer service areas, applicant shall provide a letter from LWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development and pay the required sewer fees to LWD. b. Financing: The cost of the proposed pump station, force main and trunk sewer is estimated to be $200,000.44 These sewer facilities are anticipated to be financed by the developers in Phase E. D. FINANCING An itemized cost estimate of this facility is contained in Exhibit 79. This estimate should only be used as a guide to approximate cost for preliminary planning purposes. Further cost analysis should be made as planning and design progress in Zone 11. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XV-17 EXHIBIT 75 Sewer Financing Matrix Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes Sewer Facilities LF = Linear Feet 1. PHASE A: -12" Sewer Main 2200 LF $92,100 Concurrent w/ Development Developer 2. PHASE C: -12" Sewer Main 1400 LF $59,100 Concurrent w/ Development Developer 3. PHASE E - Pump Station, Force $200,000 Concurrent w/ Developer Main and Trunk Sewer Development $351,200 Funding Options TOTAL SEWER COSTS Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-1 XVI. WATER FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Line capacity to meet the demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided concurrent with development. A minimum 10-day average storage capacity must be provided prior to any development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three agencies: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD), Vallecitos Water District (VWD), and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD). Zone 11 is located within the Vallecitos Water District (VWD), and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) service areas as shown on Exhibit 76. Developers will request adjustments to the water service boundaries, as shown on Exhibit 77, that will be processed accordingly. As an alternative to adjusting the service area boundaries, service agreements must be entered into in order to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. The applicable boards or councils must approve the service agreements. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-3 1. INVENTORY a. Existing Facilities: The existing major water facilities that serve development of Zone 11 for OMWD and VWD are as follows: i. Olivenhain Municipal Water District Facility Location 12” Line Olivenhain Road 12” Line Rancho Santa Fe Road 18” Line Rancho Santa Fe Road 16” Line Within easement from RSFR to Denk Tank OMWD 18” Line From RSFR north and east through easements to eastern boundary of Management Zone 11 12” Line La Costa Avenue 18” Line From easterly end of La Costa Ave. to northeast to 18 “ line in easement 16” Line Camino de Los Coches 16” Line Calle Acervo 12” Line Calle Barcelona 30” Line Parallel to southern boundary of zone Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-4 6.0 MG Denk Storage Supply Tank Northwest portion of OMWD Service Area in Management Zone 11 12” Line El Fuerte ii. Vallecitos Water District Facility Location 27” Line Alga Road 21” Line Alga Road 27” Line Rancho Santa Fe Road 12” Line Corintia 21” Line Melrose Avenue 20” Line Rancho Santa Fe Road b. Proposed Build Out Facilities: i. Potable System The portion of Zone 11 that is served by OMWD has all of the major water facilities in place. The district does not foresee a need for any additional major water facilities. However, additional water distribution lines are proposed to serve the ultimate build out of the portion of Zone 11 within the OMWD service area. They are as follows: Facility Location 12” line From existing 12-inch stub in Calle Barcelona east to existing water line in Calle Acervo. 16” line From existing stub in Calle Acervo southerly along proposed alignment of future collector streets to existing water line in Rancho Santa Fe Road. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-5 These additional water lines will be needed to serve the southern portion of Zone 11. The portion of Zone 11 that is served by VWD has all of the major water distribution lines in place and VWD does not foresee a need for any additional facilities for build out of Zone 11 at this time. For the purpose of this plan, however, an additional 12-inch water line is proposed along the alignment of Corintia Street from Melrose Avenue to El Fuerte Street. This line will be needed to serve the northern portion of Zone 11 that is in the VWD service area. The location and sizes of the proposed water lines have been approximated for the purpose of this plan. The actual location and sizes will be determined as individual projects within Zone 11 develop. ii. Reclaimed Water The portion of Zone 11 that is located within the VWD boundaries has the potential of several acres of open space area. The VWD Master Plan does not include any reclaimed water system improvements. It is anticipated that VWD will continue to wholesale reclaimed water produced at the Meadowlark Water Reclamation Facility to other agencies. c. Build Out Assumptions: The section of this report entitled "Build Out Projections", presents the ultimate build out projections for Management Zone 11. Since there are two water districts that serve Management Zone 11, the build out projections have been separated into each water district as follows: Land Use Projections OMWD VWD Residential 3,694 DU 2,898 DU 796 DU Commercial/ Community Facilities 45.8 ac 39.4 ac 6.4 ac Office 8.2 ac 8.2 ac School 108.1 ac 108.1 ac Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-8 d. Technical Assumptions i. Potable Water Average Unit Demand Each of the District's master plan has established dwelling unit demand factors as a basis for determining projected average water demands. The following shows the average dwelling unit demands as determined in the OMWD report: Land Use Unit Demand Residential with 10 DU/ACRES or less with greater than 10 DU/ACRE 555 GPD/ACRE 450 GPD/ACRE School and Recreation 1,250 GPD/ACRE Commercial and Public Utilities 2,500 GPD/ACRE Open Space and Parks 625 GPD/ACRE The following shows the average dwelling unit demand recommended in the 1997 VWD Master Plan update: Land Use Unit Demand Low Density Residential 1-2 EDU/ACRE 1,300 GPD/ACRE Low-Med. Density Residential 2-4 EDU/ACRE 1,500 GPD/ACRE Medium Density Residential 4-8 EDU/ACRE 1,900 GPD/ACRE Medium-High Density Residential 8-15 EDU/ACRE 3,100 GPD/ACRE High Density Residential 15-20 EDU/ACRE 3,600 GPD/ACRE Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-9 Land Use Unit Demand Estate Residential 0.25-0.5 EDU/ACRE 1,000 GPD/ACRE Multi-Rural 0.125 EDU/ACRE 1,000 GPD/ACRE Low-Multi-Rural 0.05 EDU/ACRE 1,000 GPD/ACRE Intensive Agriculture 0.125 EDU/ACRE 2,000 GPD/ACRE Institutional/Parks/School 1,300 GPD/ACRE Commercial 1,200 GPD/ACRE Office Professional 1,500 GPD/ACRE Industrial 2,000 GPD/ACRE Open Space 200 GPD/ACRE ii. Fire Flow Demands The master plans for each District used the following fire flow demands in conjunction with maximum daily demands to analyze their water systems. The fire flow demands used in the OMWD report are as follows: Land Use Fire Flow Demand Residential with 4 DU/ACRE of less 1,500 GPM Residential greater than 4 DU/ACRE 2,000 GPM School 3,000 GPM Commercial 3,500 GPM The fire flow demand used in the VWD Master Plan is a maximum flow of 2,500 GPM. For any buildings requiring a higher fire flow, sprinkler systems were assumed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-10 e. Projected Build Out Demand: The projected build out average water demand can be determined for the portion of each water district within Zone 11 by using the build out projections as established by this plan and the average dwelling unit demands obtained from each master plan. The following tables for the yearly build out projection for each water district are for planning purposes only and should not be used as a limitation to development. f. Olivenhain Municipal Water District The following chart depicts the yearly build out projections for that portion of Zone 11 served by OMWD. Land Use Projected Build Out Average Demand Avg. Water Demand Residential RL RLM RM RMH 204 DU 2,624 DU 269 DU 631 DU U 1,300 GPD/DU 500 GPD/DU 315 GPD/DU 250 GPD/DU 265,200 GPD 1,312,000 GPD 84,735 GPD 157,750 GPD School 108.1 AC 1,250 GPD/AC 135,125 GPD Gross Office 8.2 AC 2,500 GPD/AC 20,500 GPD Commercial 38.0 AC 2,500 GPD/AC 95,000 GPD Neighborhood Commercial 4.1 AC 2,500 GPD/AC 10,250 GPD TOTAL 2,080,560 GPD Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-11 g. Vallecitos Water District The following chart depicts the yearly build out projections for that portion of Zone 11 served by VWD. Land Use Projected Build Out Average Demand Avg. Water Demand Residential RLM RMH 567 DU 229 DU 500 GPD/DU 315 GPD/DU 283,500 GPD 61,830 GPD Community Facilities 6.4 net acres 1,200 GPD/AC 7,680 GPD TOTAL 353,010 GPD The OMWD report projected the ultimate average water demand for the area in Zone 11 served by OMWD to be 1.80 MGD. The VWD Master Plan projected the ultimate average water demand for the area in Zone 11 served by VWD to be 0.30 MGD. These projected build out average water demands were extrapolated from data obtained from the master plans of the districts. These ultimate demands were used by the master plans to evaluate the water distribution system within each district. The projected build out average water demand, as determined by this plan, is lower than projected in the master plans. Therefore, the master plans for each district can be used as a tool for determining the proposed major water facilities for this zone, and conformance with the adopted performance standard will be assured through build out of Zone 11. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-12 f. Possible Use of Reclaimed Water: The portion of Zone 11 that is located within the VWD boundaries has the potential of several acres of open space area. The VWD Master Plan does not include any reclaimed water system improvements. It is anticipated that VWD will continue to wholesale reclaimed water produced at the Meadowlark Water Reclamation Facility to other agencies. g. Average 10-Day Storage Capacity: OMWD has indicated that there is currently sufficient storage capacity in the district system to serve its needs as determined by the OMWD Board of Directors. They also indicated that the district has plans to provide for an average 10-day storage capacity based on ultimate build out of the district and accordance with the districts capital improvement program (CIP). During the preparation of the Citywide plan, it was determined that an average 3.2-day storage was acceptable for VWD. VWD indicated that they currently have an average 3.2-day storage capacity and have plans to maintain the storage capacity for ultimate build out of their District. 2. PHASING The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. Phasing boundaries are shown on Exhibit 78 and correlate with property boundaries or logical boundaries for the proposed water facilities within the Zone. There are six separate phases, labeled Phases A through G, and thresholds for the major water facilities within each phase can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The phasing boundaries allow for independent review and development for the water facilities within each boundary. Development within one phase is completely independent of the improvement requirements of another phase. However, the water districts may require improvements outside of the phase boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-13 C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS The water distribution system for Zone 11 currently conforms to the adopted performance standard. The development review process established by both VWD and OMWD will ensure that Zone 11 will remain in conformance with the adopted performance standard through build out of this Zone. D. MITIGATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 11: 1. PHASE A: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. 2. All development within Phase A shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. b. Financing: There is no special financing required for Phase A. 2. PHASE B: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of VWD. The 12-inch water line proposed from the existing 12-inch stub in Corintia Street to El Fuerte Street shall be installed as required by VWD. 2. All development within Phase B shall pay the appropriate water fees established by VWD. b. Financing: The cost of the proposed 12-inch water line is estimated to be $154,600. This water line is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase B. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-14 3. PHASE C: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. 2. All development within Phase C shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. b. Financing: There is no special financing required for Phase C. 4. PHASE D: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The 12-inch water line proposed in the extension of Calle Barcelona and a portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed as required by OMWD. 2. All development within Phase D shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. b. Financing: The cost of the proposed water lines are estimated to be $151,800. These water lines are anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase D. 5. PHASE E: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed, as required by OMWD. 2. All development within Phase E shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-15 b. Financing: The cost of the proposed water line is estimated to be $114,400 for Phase E. This water line is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase E. 6. PHASE F: a. Special Conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. The portion of the 16-inch water line proposed in the future extension of Calle Acervo shall be installed, as required by OMWD. 2. All development within Phase F shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. b. Financing: The cost of the proposed water line is estimated to be $116,600 for Phase F. This water line is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Phase F. 7. PHASE G: a. Special conditions: 1. Water facilities will be provided at the time of development to the satisfaction of OMWD. 2. All development within Phase G shall pay the appropriate water fees established by OMWD. b. Financing: There is no special financing required for Phase G. E. FINANCING. An itemized cost estimate of this facility is contained in Exhibit 79. This estimate should only be used as a guide to approximate cost for preliminary planning purposes. Further cost analysis should be made as planning and design progress in Zone 11. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVI-16 EXHIBIT 79 Water Facility Financing Matrix Funding Options Facility Amount Estimated Cost Timing First Second Third Notes Water Facilities LF = Linear Feet 1. PHASE B or C: -12" Water Main 2200 LF 154,600$ Concurrent w/ Development Developer 2. PHASE D: -12" Water Main 1100 LF 40,200$ Concurrent w/ Development Developer -16" Water Main 2000 LF 111,600$ Concurrent w/ Development Developer 3. PHASE E: -16" Water Main 2000 LF 114,440$ Concurrent w/ Development Developer 4. PHASE F: -16" Water Main 2000 LF 116,600$ Concurrent w/ Development Developer TOTAL WATER COSTS 537,440$ Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-1 XVII. FACILITIES FINANCING This chapter describes the proposed financing method or methods for each of the facilities which are identified in Parts VI-XVI (Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements) as required to meet the City’s Growth Management Program Performance Standards. The financing method consists of: • Source of funds for construction of the facility. • Method of guaranteeing the availability of funds. • Source of public funds from which reimbursement is made to the developer of the facility, if applicable. This part may be used in the following ways: • For special conditions as described in the mitigation sections of Part I, Section C of this chapter describes the financing method and the sub area or sub areas responsible for providing the financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance. • For any development located in Zone 11, Exhibit 80 of Section C below identifies facilities for which the developer must provide the financing guarantee. A. AREAS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY FINANCING In order to clarify the responsibility of individual development projects to provide specific facilities, Zone 11 has been divided into fivesub areas, called Facility Areas, as shown in Exhibit 80. Assessor’s parcels included in the Facility Areas are listed in Exhibit 81. Certain parcels are excluded from the Facility Areas because there is existing development or because the City of Carlsbad or the Carlsbad Municipal Water District owns them. Although the Facility Areas are defined primarily to identify groups of ownerships, they are also defined to correspond approximately to infrastructure service areas as described in Parts VI-XVI. The correspondence between Facility Areas and drainage and sewer basins is shown below. There are three drainage basins in the zone: Encinitas Creek basin (En.C.), San Marcos Creek basin (S.M.C.), and the Escondido Creek (Es.C.). Sewer basins are those defined by the City of Carlsbad’s Master Plan of Sewerage. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-3 Exhibit 81 Assessor’s Parcels of Facility Areas Land Owner APN Real Estate Collateral Management 222-151-80 222-470-23, 25 223-010-12, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 223-011-02, 03, 04, 05, 06 223-021-08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 223-050-49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 65, 67, 69 Real Estate Collateral Management 223-322-02 Real Estate Collateral Management 223-220-71; 255-031-17 Real Estate Collateral Management 223-032-01, 02 223-060-49, 15 223-071-05, 07, 09 San Marcos County Water District 223-021-17 City of Carlsbad/Fire Station No. 6 223-050-66 San Marcos County Water District (Reclaimed Water Lake) 223-071-10 Olivenhain Municipal Water District (Water Storage) 223-071-06 Daniel Shelley 223-061-01 La Costa Town Square, LLC 223-060-31,32 & 223-050-68,70 Union Oil 223-060-28 Walter Four S Ranch Co. 223-060-29 City of Carlsbad/Stagecoach Park 223-060-60, 61 La Costa Estancia 255-031-20 Encinitas Union School District 255-031-28 Real Estate Collateral Management 255-031-26 Shelley 264-010-32 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-4 Facility Area Drainage Basin Sewer Basin A Encinitas Creek LWD 8 &10 B En.C., S.M.C. VWD C San Marcos Creek VWD D Encinitas Creek LWD 8 E Encinitas Creek LWD 8 Some Facility Areas are served by more than one drainage basin. Additional information is required to determine which basin would apply to a particular project. For diagrams and additional data regarding infrastructure service areas, see respective facility sections of Parts VI-XVI. B. TYPES OF FINANCING METHODS The following sources of funds and financing guarantees are used in this plan. The application of these funds and completion of specified actions identified as “financing guarantee” shall constitute the guarantee that facilities will be provided, as required by Section 21.90.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 1. DEVELOPER FUNDING Under this method the developer will fund and construct certain required facilities prior to or concurrent with development of their particular property. Facilities to be funded in this way are those which normally would be imposed as conditions of approval of a tentative map under the City’s development review process. The financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance that funds will be available for construction of the required facility shall be provided through delivery to the City of an acceptable security instrument, such as a surety bond, or through execution of an improvement agreement prior to the recordation of the final map. The improvement agreement must be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The agreement must also be accompanied by a security instrument as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, i.e., as a surety bond, cash deposit, or an instrument or letter of credit. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-5 2. CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITES DISTRICT NO. 1 A Mello-Roos community facilities district has been formed by the City of Carlsbad and approved on May 7, 1991, by an affirmative vote of the landowners to fund construction of certain citywide facilities, including a number of facilities which are required by this plan. The financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance for any of the facilities to be funded by Carlsbad CFD No.1 will be satisfied by participation in the district. 3. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACT FEES Capital Improvement Programs of the City of Carlsbad and special districts contain plans to construct certain facilities including a number of facilities which are required by this plan. Sources of funds for these facilities are development impact fees which are collected at issuance of building permit. For facilities that are proposed to be funded from development fees, payment of such fees will satisfy the private developer’s financial obligation for these facilities, as long as the applicable Growth Management Program Performance Standards are satisfied. 4. REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOPMENT FEE FUND If a developer constructs a facility which is included in a City of Carlsbad development impact fee program, they may be reimbursed from the applicable fee fund, subject to the following conditions: • That sufficient, unobligated funds are available; • That the reimbursement is consistent with the priority of project funding shown in the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program; and • That the reimbursement shall not exceed the maximum amount budgeted on the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program. Costs eligible for reimbursement shall be limited to those that are directly related to the construction of the facility, as determined by the City Engineer. Examples of eligible costs are costs of construction, engineering design, cost estimates, and any other costs, which are incidental to construction. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-6 C. FINANCING PLAN This section summarizes the required facilities, sources of funds, and areas responsible for financing. A summary table (Exhibit 82) is followed by subsections corresponding to facility categories described in Part I. For Circulation, sewer collection and water distribution facilities, the financing method is described for each required facility. These detailed financing methods contain the following data: Special Conditions The identifying number of the special condition for mitigation. Estimated Cost Estimated costs. Source of Funds One or more of alternative sources of funds. Financing Guarantee Guarantees applicable to selected source of funds. Responsible Area Facility Area or Areas that are required to fund or guarantee the facility (see Exhibit 80) Reimbursement Reimbursement due to the initial developer of the facility and the source of funds, if applicable. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-9 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities The required facilities are the New City Hall and the Public Works Center. These facilities are required for all zones in the City including Zone 11. Source of Funds The City’s Capital Improvement Program includes the above facilities. The Public Works Center and New City Hall will be funded through the Carlsbad CFD No.1. Financing Guarantee Participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 1 satisfies the financing guarantee for the facilities included in the CFD. Payment of Public Facilities Fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for the remainder of City Administrative Facilities, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standards are met. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-10 LIBRARY FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities The required facility is the expansion of the North Library (Cole). The same facility is required for all zones in the City, including Zone 11. Source of Funds The City’s Capital Improvement Program includes the above facility. The source of funds is Public Facilities Fee collected at issuance of building permit. The expansion of the North Library is also proposed to be funded through Carlsbad CFD No.1. Financing Guarantee Participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 1 satisfies the financing guarantee for the facilities included in the CFD. Payment of Public Facilities Fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for the remainder of Library Facilities, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standard for libraries is met. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-11 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY – FINANCING Required Facilities The required facilities are the Encina Building Improvements and the Encina Phase V Expansion with Interim capacities. Source of Funds The source of funds for these facilities is the sewer connection fee collected by Carlsbad Municipal Water District. Financing Guarantee Payment of sewer connection fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for Wastewater Treatment Capacity. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-12 PARK FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities Park facilities required for the Southeast Quadrant are Alga Norte Park and Leo Carillo Park. Source of Funds Land has been or will be acquired for all park facilities required to serve future development in Zone 11. Park improvements will be funded from Public Facilities Fees or through the parks agreement executed by the City and developers. All park improvements are incorporated in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. No additional sources of funds are required. Financing Guarantee Payment of Park-in-Lieu and Public Facilities Fees shall satisfy the financing guarantee for construction of the future parks, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standards for parks are met. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-13 CIRCULATION FACILITIES – FINANCING Required circulation facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Circulation Section of Part XI. Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-14 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.1 Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $17,224,000 CFD #1 & 2, Developer Participation in CFD No. 1 & 2, Improvement Agreement A-E Not Applicable Facility The required facility includes the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road from Melrose Drive to La Costa Avenue. Included within the construction/realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road will be the intersections of Melrose Drive, La Costa Meadows Drive and Questhaven Road. Source of Funds This facility will be funded by the CFD #1 & 2 along with additional funds from federal grants. CFD No. #2 will fund the major road improvements to Rancho Santa Fe Road, four lanes only, from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive, Olivenhain Road east of ECR and Rancho Santa Fe Road south into Encinitas. The additional outside two lanes required by this LFMP will be funded by the developer. Financing Guarantee The financing will be guaranteed by participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 1 & 2. The additional outside two lane improvements will be guaranteed by an improvement agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the developer. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-15 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.2 Widening of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. from La Costa Ave. Melrose Dr. from four to six lanes Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified Not Specified Developer Improvement Agreement A-E Not Applicable Facility The required facility includes the widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road from four to six lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Avenue. The widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road will include improvements to the intersections of La Costa Meadows Drive, Questhaven Road and La Costa Avenue with Rancho Santa Fe Road. Source of Funds This facility is anticipated to be funded by the Developer of Finance Areas A-E. Financing Guarantee The financing will be guaranteed by an Improvement Agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the developer. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-16 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.3 Additional thru and turn lanes at the Melrose Dr./ Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Intersection Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified Not Specified CFD #2 Participation in CFD No.2 A-E Not Applicable Source of Funds This facility will be funded by the Rancho Santa Fe Road CFD #2. CFD No. #2 will fund the major road improvements to Rancho Santa Fe Road from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive, Olivenhain Road east of ECR and Rancho Santa Fe Road south into Encinitas. Financing Guarantee The financing will be guaranteed by participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 2. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-17 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.4 Additional turn lanes at the Rancho Santa Fe Rd./ Questhaven Rd. Intersection Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified Not Specified CFD #2 Participation in CFD No.2 A-E Not Applicable Source of Funds This facility will be funded by the Rancho Santa Fe Road CFD #2. CFD No. #2 will fund the major road improvements to Rancho Santa Fe Road from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive, Olivenhain Road east of ECR and Rancho Santa Fe Road south into Encinitas. Financing Guarantee The financing will be guaranteed by participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 2. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-18 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.5 Additional thru and turn lanes at the Rancho Santa Fe Rd./Olivenhain Rd./Camino Alvaro Intersection Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified Not Specified CFD #2, Developer Participation in CFD No.2, Improvement Agreement A-E Not Applicable Source of Funds This facility will be funded by the Rancho Santa Fe Road CFD #2. CFD No. 2 will fund the major road improvements to Rancho Santa Fe Road from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive, Olivenhain Road east of ECR and Rancho Santa Fe Road south into Encinitas. If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-E, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee The financing will be guaranteed by participation in Carlsbad CFD No. 2. If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-E. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-19 Reimbursement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-E are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-20 FIRE FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities The required facility is the permanent location of Fire Station No. 6. Source of Funds The City of Carlsbad’s Capital Improvement Program includes the above facility. The source of funds is the Public Facilities Fee collected at issuance of building permit. Financing Guarantee Payment of Public Facilities Fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for the permanent location of Fire Station No. 6, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standard for Fire Facilities is met. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-21 OPEN SPACE FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities Open Space must be set aside per the Growth Management Program standards. Source of Funds Funding for open space shall be provided by private developers. Financing Guarantee No specific guarantee is required. Necessary open space shall be dedicated as a condition of approval of a subdivision map. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-22 SCHOOL FACILITIES – FINANCING Required Facilities Facilities as required by San Marcos Unified School District, Encinitas Union Elementary School District and the San Dieguito High School District. Source of Funds Developer shall pay the applicable school fees for the corresponding school district. Financing Guarantee The developer shall pay the applicable school fees for each school district or the participation in a Mello Roos District. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-23 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM – FINANCING Required sewer facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Sewer Collection Section of Part XV. Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-24 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.1 12” Sewer Main — East of La Costa Racquet Club Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $92,100 Developers Improvement Agreement A Not Applicable Facility This facility consists of a 12-inch sewer line east of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in Camino de Los Coches to the existing 12-inch terminus in Stagecoach Park. Source of Funds This facility is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Finance Area A. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Area A, the required facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-25 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.2 12” Sewer Main — West of La Costa Racquet Club Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $59,100 Developers Improvement Agreement D Not Applicable Facility This facility consists of the 12-inch sewer line west of La Costa Racquet Club, from the existing 12-inch stub in La Costa Avenue to the existing 12-inch trunk sewer in Stage Coach Park. Source of Funds This facility is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Finance Area D. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Area D, the required facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-26 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.3 Pump Station and Force Main Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $200,000 Developers Improvement Agreement D Not Applicable Source of Funds These sewer facilities are anticipated to be financed by the developers in Finance Area D. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Area D, the required facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-27 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM – FINANCING Required water facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Water Distribution System Section of Part XVI. Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-28 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.1 12” Water Line Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $154,600 Developers Improvement Agreement B Not Applicable Facility This facility consists of a 12-inch water line from the existing 12-inch stub in Corintia Street to El Fuerte as required by VWD. Source of Funds This water facility is anticipated to be financed by the developers of Finance Area. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Area B, the required facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-29 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.2 12” and 16” Water Line in Calle Acervo Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $151,800 Developers Improvement Agreement - Not Applicable Facility This facility has been completed by development. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-30 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.3 16” Water Line in Calle Acervo Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $114,400 Developers Improvement Agreement - Not Applicable Facility This facility has been completed by development. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVII-31 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.4 16” Water Line in Calle Acervo Special Condition Estimated Cost Source of Funds Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Not Specified $116,600 Developers Improvement Agreement - Not Applicable Facility This facility has been completed by development. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XVIII-1 XVIII. REFERENCES “1994 Planning Study Update” Parsons Engineering Science, April 1995. "Benefit Area Fees For Conveyance System Improvements Update To The December, 1987 City Of Carlsbad Master Plan Of Sewerage" Wilson Engineering, December 1990. “Brief Generation Guide” San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), July 1998. “Capital Improvement Program 1992-1993 to Build Out,” “Capital Improvement Program 1999-2000 to Build Out,” and “Capital Improvement Program 2000-2001 to Build Out,” City of Carlsbad. "City of Carlsbad Master Plan of Sewerage" Wilson Engineering, January 1992. "City of Carlsbad's Water Reclamation Master Plan" Dudek & Associates, INC., March 3, 1992. “Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan” City of Carlsbad, Revised September 29, 1986. “Encina Water Pollution Facility Wastewater Flows” Encina Water Pollution Control Facility, November 2000. “Habitat Conservation Plan/ Ongoing Multi-Species Plan” City of Carlsbad, Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, California Department of Fish and Game, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, June 1995. “Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan" Carlsbad Engineering Department, Fraser Engineering, INC., Cooper Engineering Associates, March 1994. “Sewer Master Plan Update Volume V, October 1997” Carollo Engineers, 1997. “Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01” Jack Henthorn & Associates, December 2000. "Water Master Plan" Carlsbad Municipal Water District Project No. 89-105, January 29, 1991. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 June, 2000 XIX-1 XIX. APPENDICES A-1 CONSTRAINTS MAP A-2 JOINT USE AGREEMENTS A-3 DWELLING UNIT TRANSFER RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORT A-4 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT A-5 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A-6 DISTRICT WILL SERVE LETTERS Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-1 CONSTRAINTS MAP June, 2000 Zone 11 Constraints Exhibit Legend /'v Project Boundary / 'v - ml!lllllllllll!II I · · . . I . . . . . . . . . . A - B C D E F G H I J K Major Powerline Easement Circulation Railroad R.O.W. 40 % and Greater Slopes Riparian Wetlands Floodplain Permanent Body of Water Other Environmental Features 25 to 40% Slopes School Site Overlay Acres of Developmental Constraints (1) Full Partial General Plan Land Use Designation Gross Notes Acres A B C D E F G H TOTAL C1 Ml 26 2.2 0.4 C2 4.7 0.2 0.2 Total C 39.3 0.0 2.8 2.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ 9.1 2.7 2.6 0.1 N2 5.6 1.4 1.4 TotalCF/N 14.7 0.0 4.1 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U 29.0 4 0 1.4 0.2 2.4 G/0 1 2.2 1.2 1.2 J J/2 2.3 1.2 0.3 0.2 2.6 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 5.5 2.8 01 9.1 1.7 0.2 0.1 1.7 Total O 11.3 2.9 0.2 0.1 2.9 72.0 6.1 OS 1 539.9 127.0 9.9 215.0 1172 58.6 9.8 0.4 OS 2 10.1 10.2 0.0 1.4 OS 3 6.0 4.0 5.4 0.0 OS 4 12.5 0.0 0.0 OS 5 27.0 0.1 5.0 3.2 1.6 4.9 0.4 0.1 OS 6 0.4 0.5 0.0 1.3 OS 7 7.6 1.3 0.1 0.1 6.7 OS 8 56.9 24.4 2.8 1.4 1.0 14.4 2.3 0.8 OS 9 36.6 11.1 2.0 1.0 1.2 2.7 6.4 OS 10 4.2 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.6 OS 11 54.7 1.6 12.1 6.1 Schools K o.o 0.0 Net Developer Acres 30.9 4.3 35.2 6.4 4.1 10.5 22.3 1.0 73 8.3 ..,T .. ot.,.a1_os _____ --75,.,.5.,..9_8_7_.1-1-,1,.,..6.8+.;.;.;.+.;.;;..;..;.+.;....;+---+-+--,-+-2.,,15.,,·a➔-13_s_.3+-6..,9.2.-+-o_.o--t-~,--t ..,R,..L ,,..1 ---t--+-5-:::8:-:.9-+--t-3_.3 -1--1---+--+--+-+---+--t--3._3 -1----,-1-,.,0 . ..,0-t----t---:5-,,5:-:_6--t 0.0 131.3 31.9 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 RL 2 166.3 6.0 24.2 12.1 148.2 4.2 1.8 ..,T_o1_a1_R_L --1---.2 ... 25,..,.2,...._o._0 "'""'3_.3 +.;.;o.o~.,..;,+---~;;..+.;....;+-+-+...,.,,9 . .,,3 +.,.,24,.,.2,....,,,12.,,.1-+-_o_.o--t--,2..,oJ,.,.8--t RLM 1 190.8 10.6 56.0 28.0 152.2 4.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 RLM 2 102.9 1.8 5.3 7.8 3.9 93.7 2.2 1.3 F-R==LM~3 --+---ll-"c24 __ 1cc.8-+"'0.:::.2 -+-1-'-'--3.1 +--+...::c.::.+..:::.::+-+-+--,-+:::23"'.1-+-=2,.:7·;:-5 +:1::=-3 ·:::.8 +----t--=2=:04:'-:.9"--i ,_R_LM_4 __ -+-_-+-_3_1.1--<l----<-4_.2-+-+---+--+---l!---+--!---+--4--.2--lf--,2~.2-+_1_.1-l----+--,2.,.5.=-8 --I '=R""LM-5 --+---+--4,.,9."=1 -+--+-,1,.,...7 +--+-;.:.:-+~+-=-:-+--l---1!---t--;;3"::.7-+--:3;;;.5':---t-1:f-.8::--t--+--,-;;43='.7<"""'1 F-R==LM~6 --+---l-'-16'-'8'-'.5-+-+-3"-'-.9 +--+--"--+-'----+-,-c,-t--t---11---+--,,8:-:.8-+--:1-,-9 . .,..1 -t-9:-,.6::-t---t--1:-:-5::-0.2::--t 1:R.,.,LM.,..7,----t--+-1..,.69.,..8-+-+-:3:-::-.7 -1--1--=---+-;;.;.;;_+..::;c:..+-+---+--t--1:..c-0.::..3-t--'-11"".3-+---5.c..7-t----t--'1.,.53"".9--t l=Rc':LM"-:8';;;-;-:---t---t-;::-:,1.;'-;0 :-+-::--::-+:0::"::-.9 +-,-:-t--,-,-,-1-,,.,,.;-,,...,..+-=-:-t-:-,,+-::-::--t-=0 . ..,.9-t-:-:-=-:-t-,:-:O.c::0-1---:-::-t--:c:-O.:-c1 --t otal RLM 955.0 2.0 27.5 0.0 66.9 127.4 63.7 0.0 824.4 6.5 3.3 1.9 0.1 4.4 0.4 0.1 2.7 0.6 3.3 28.3 5.7 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 RM 1 13.8 0.8 0.8 32 1.6 11.5 '=Rc,cM-"2---+--+-cc4 . .c,6 -1---1-1,_,...1 +--+..,..,.-+--+--+-t--t--+----,-1 . .,.1 -t-_2_.4-+--=-'--=-2-t--:-t--,::::2 . .,,3 :-t 1=R,..,M,..,3c:::-:,---+--t-'""'2°"5.70-t--::-::--t-,1:-::-.6 +--+...:Oc=.2'-+--+--t--+-_,-,f---+--1..,..8-+-=-c-+-O,,-.Oc-t--:~-1----:-:23,.,.2-t i,;,,;.,ota,;,;1.;.;RM;;;_---11--➔-4,.,3.,,.4-+-"o.""8 +'2'"'"".1 +-o ..... o +-o"'.2+ .... 0.0-+_o._o +-o._o +-o_.o-+-o_.o..,...'l:"3,-::-7 -1-.,,5-::-.6-t--:-2.-:-s-t-_o_.o--t_J::-::7-:-.o--t RMH 1 11.5 0.0 2.2 1.1 10.4 RMH 2 36.3 0.9 0.1 4.0 2.5 1.3 31.1 3.0 RMH 3 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.9 RMH 4 22.1 6.7 4.1 2.0 13.4 0.6 6.1 Total RMH 70.9 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 8.8 4.4 0.0 54.9 0.6 10.0 0.0 E1 9.9 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 9.1 E2 86.3 3.5 1.2 5.0 14.3 7.2 67.0 0.3 E3 11.9 0.8 0.1 0.1 11.1 0.8 Total E 108.1 3.5 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 14.9 7.5 87.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 TOTAL 2252.8 I 90.5 70.5 0.0 170.5 40.8 12.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 387.2 ._ _____ _..__._ __ .__ .... _ 327.7 163.8 87.2 1196.3 N E s Scale 1"=400' RLM? Path: M :\G IS\ 1859\2x\exhibits\active\Constraints 1 Date: 5/24/01 OS N JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES Umd Planning • Project Management PLANNING ENGINEERING SI.JI.VEYING HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES S A N OIEGO, INC, Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-2 JOINT USE AGREEMENTS June,2000 AGRE!:M.ENT B!:TWE...~ TH!: CITY OF CARLSBAD AND Tm: SAN MARCOS O'NIFI!:C SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUESTS REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK AND/SEP.VICES PERFORMED BY THE DISTRICT ON CITY PROPERTY TRIS AGUEM.c.,.T is made and entered into this --day of ______ , by and between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the •city• and the San Marcos Unified School District, San Diego County, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the ~District". WITNESS ETH: WBEP-!:AS, the City and District wish to provide recreational and educational facilities for the residents of Carlsbad; and WHEREAS, the District has performed certain services to develop a portion of Fuerte Park for the City; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to reimburse the District for the services they have performed. 1. The City will pay the following amount for work and services: A. Grading B. Fill Dirt c •. Elimination of the Corintia access (mounding and landscaping) o. Fencing top of slopes and the Corintia Street frontage E. Architect & Engineering services TOTAL $20,000 20,000 4,000 8,000 3,000 $55,000 ✓ - Agreement With San Marcos Unified School District Page TWO 2. The City will administer and contract out the following remaining portion of the park development. A. Soil Amendments (turf section) B. Irrigation installation and turf planting C. Purchase a.nd installation of (1) backstoo .. (large field only) o. Purchase a.nd installation of bleachers and drinking fountain E. Installation of stairway F. Installation of walkway, South section of school · if necessary IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on the day a.nd year written a.bove. ATTEST: IU;t/4,. / e,~ ALETHA L. RAOTENiiliz City Clerk Clerk, Board of Trustees APPROVED AS TO-FORM: -... CITY OF CA..~SEAD, A Municioal Corporation of the State of California MARY ~R, Mayor SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT President, Board of Trustees AF PROVED AS TO FOR."!: SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNSEL ·, \ AGREEMENT FOR MAINTEN.AtICE AND USE OF LEV.ANTE SCHOOL SITE, LA COSTA, BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND E~ICI?rI'rAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is.made and entered·into this 16th day of __ .::.J;::;an::;.u;:;.a;;:;r_y......, __ , ·l..97,L, by and b~-b.,een the City of Carlsbad, a municipal. corporation, her~inafJer referred to as the •city,• and the Encinitas Union El.ementa.ry School. District, San Dieg~ county, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the •oistrict.• W. IT NESSETH: ~:HE?-EAS, in order.to promote and provide fa= the health and genera1 wel.fare of the people·of Carl.sbad, and to cultivate the developc~nt of good citizenship by an adequate program. of l . co~.r.iunity recreation, the parties hereto desire to enter into an agreem~t for a community recreation program on the Levante School site within the City; and WEC:REAS, the City has heretofore created and established a Park and Recrea~on Commission and has developed and established a park program and-desires to employ pers~ns qualified to supervise, direct, and conduct a recreation program for the City of Carlsbad; and WHEREAS, the operation of a community recreation program on a school district site or with school district facilities,. through the City Park and Recreation Departr.\cnt, when said site .. er facilities are not in use by the Oist_rict, ~ill promote the hciJ.lth '3.nd welfare of the ·community and ·will contribute to the attainment of the general recreation objectives for children and ts within tha comm~ity; and \·1HERE:l\S, cities and school f:!is~ric:;ts a.re authorized by. , chaoter 10 of Part 7, Division l, Title l of the Education . code of·the State of Cali£o~ia to organize, promote, and conduc~ . . n program of community recreati~n and to operate a community . recreation.center within and wi~hout their territorial limits; lraEREAS, it is also provided by said Chapter 10 of Part 7, oivi:ion l, Title l of the Education Code that the foregoing cnti~ies may cooperate .with each other to carry out these pu~oses, ~~d to that end r.ay er.ter into agreements with each other and cay • ' I do ~ll things necessary or convenient to aid· and cooperate in :=yirig oot such purposes; and --W"dE?.E:AS, the District owns the Levante School Site and does not intend to use said site until such time as construction of a school facility therein is begun;·but desires tha~ ilie City shall have the use of said si ta for co~unity recre·ational purposes; NOH, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND ·THE DISTRICT agree as follows: l. The District sh~ll provide at no cost to the City for outdoor r~crcational activities the use of the landscaped grounds, I restroom facilities, stornge area and all playground ecuioment -·-----... __ .... _ . presently located in the area known as the Levante School site, rnrccl. ?to. 24, Lo~ No. 250 as shown on San Diego County· Assessor's Mnp No. 7457, a copy of which is attached he~cto as Exhibit A and ,il.de a pa.rt hereof. 2.· 2. The City -Carl sb.ad, through its Park and Recreation ! nission and ~a.rk and Rec:-reation Oepartment, agrees to conduct, .,1~intain, and operatG on said. site and ~n such fac~l.i.t.ic.s-.nnd equip~'lll~ as may b~ __ made. available_by the District, a program --- of supervised recreation and the City agrees to supply all nccassaey supervision, leadersh~p, pla~ning, and personnel for . . the maintenance and operation of said program. ------ 3. The City shall at all times be responsible for the pl~nning and operation of the recreation program, as well as for the acts of its effl?loyees, or any event, thing, accident or occurrence that should occur during the operation of said program and which is within the scope of control of said City or its employees. 4. The recrea:ion program shall be under the jurisdiction . . -· ~nd cont:01· of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City. Said prog=a.m shall consist of activities and at that . . level as determined by the City Council or its aut..~orized rc?rosentative. For the PU.."'"'?OSe of coordinating the activities herein contemplated, the City-hereby appoints its Parks and Recreation Director as the representative of the City and the City's Park and Recreation Commission, who shall be the responsible manager of the recreation program,and shall coordinate all aspects of thi~ program with. th~ District, its governing B-::>ard, and the Park ~nd Rccrc~tion Commi~sion of the City • . 3. .·• s. City shall be allowed to use the site fer its recreational , grams from 8:00 A.M.'until 11:00 P.M. daily. However, the District shall have priority in the use~£ t.he site or any part thereo~, or any facility or equipment thereon for District purposes if it notifies the City in writing at least forty-eight hou.rs in ) advance of the intended use of the sit_e • . 6. All persons employed in the performance of services and functions for said City shall be deel!led City e..~ployees and no city er-1.ployee as such shall be considered as an e.r.i.ployee of the Di!.trict: or u.""l.der the jurisdiction of t..."ie District., nor shall such city ~~?loyees have any District pension,· civil service, or othe= st.:i.tus or like while an employee of ., the City. Sa.id District shall not be called upon to as su..~e '1ny .• 1bi li ty :or ... 'h .... -.i.. -direct payment of :: any· salary, wage, or oth::r COr."?c~sa~io~ to a.""l.y City.personnel performing services hereunder for 5~id City, or any liability other than th~t provided for in this ag=ee.ment. Said City shall not be liable for cornoensation or indc::..,ity to any District employee for injury or sickness or· wugcs arising out of his employment with said District. 7. It is further convenanted and agreed, exc~pt as other- wise provided, neither party shall be responsible to the other party for the cost of this program. The C~ty covenants an~_agFees -.. ·-·---· to be rc~pon~iblc und to pay all ch~rges th~t it should incur in ~c~p~ct to the operation of this rccrcntion program, including - the co:;t of ::;E;r:vicc of its cmploy'ccs as wall as inciclcnt.:il co~ts in connection therewith- ··------- The District covcn~nts and agrees to 4. //' I ~y all costs of its employees necessary in connection with·this ~rog~am and said District further covenants and agrees that no rcnt~l charge or fee will be im~osed on the City in respect to the operation of this program. . a. ~he recreation program~conducted by the City shall be open to pa~ticipation by any ana all persons residing within the bound.J.ries of the Dist=ict and City, but s~c::h participation shD.ll be subject to any rules ~nd regulations adopted by the.Park and Recreation D~partment of the City. (!; !,he CJ:_ t';( shali m_ai~tain the landscaped ~..:.,.a__E~~.,..r~g, £crtilizing and edging the grass; maintaining tl:ie instal}ed .. -· . ... ··----~'"·• ----..... . -· ... ! ..... -··· . irriq~tion system: applying necessary ch~~icals; and cleaning .. __ ,,._ . . -. ~tl stocking t:ie rest.room facilities at the expense of the.-Ci..:.y. _ __..,,.. ··---•·. ---------· --· . .:. , . \ 10. T~e District shall be responsible for all repairs .e-- ~ecessary to r..aintain the restroom and storage facilities and . . . all playground equipment in a safe and usable manner. The Dist=ict shall make such repairs within a reasonable time aft~r being requested by the City. ·il:-No altera~ion~, irnp=ovements or additions shall be made ~ ....... , by City without prior-written approval of District. Any antl all alterations, improvements or additions shall be ma·de nnd performed 'in a good workmanlike manner and in accordance wit~ all statutes, ordin~nccs and regulations applicable thereto. 12~ The District shall provide and pay for iJ.ll water cind . . scw~go utilities necessary to mainti::l.in and op~rat~ the ground~ and rc=troom and storage facilities. 5. --·-.. .-· '13~ The City shall provide and pay· for all electrical -· ili ties necessary to maintain and··operat~ the grounds and rest-~ room and storage facilities. 1_4. city and District, at their respective expense, shall comply with and observe_ and all the requirements of the sec~r~ compliance and observation with ) carrsbad Municipal Code and all . Hu.."'licipal, Cou."'lty, State and Federal -ordinances, codes, statutes ' . and reguln. tions now in force or which may herea_fter be in force cipplicable to the grounds, restroom and storage f acili tie·s and · cquip::ient. 15. Insofar•as it is ;egally authorized, District shall hold . . free ilnd ha=::r.less City·, members of the City Council,: boarc.s or cor.:;.i~5io~s, its ern?loyees, officers and agents, while acting as UC~\, f rouL all cl air.ts, loss, damages, cos ~s, exp ens es or "iiabi li ty ,.:hie::. r:i.:iy a=-ise by reason of liability imposed by law beca~se of inju:::y to pro?erty or injury to or death of person_s, received or nuf:~rcd by reason of any defective or dangerous conditio~ of nny ,;rou..."1.d, site., building, equipment, play arc~s, recreation - facilities or other improvement located on the premises owned or maintained by Distric~. Insofar as it is legally authorized, City shall hold free and h~rrnless District, members of.tha governing board, its cmploycas, officers and agents, while acting as such, from all cl~im~, loss, damages,. costs, exp7nses or li~bility which may 6. ise by reason· of liability imposed by· law because of injury to pr.:,perty or injury to or death of persons, received or suffe~ed by reason of operation of the community recreational program upon said pre~ises and,:further, the Ci~ shall be . I responsible for any and all damages to school property caused as a direct result of any recreational activity being conducted on said premises by the City. 16. The City further covenants and agrees during the term of this agreement, to maintain liability insurance, insuring c:iid city, as well as said_ District, its _of !icers and re spans ib le cm~loyces,· fro~ any liability that might arise because of , n,:<J lii;cnce, r,.egligent act, or omission on the part of any Ci t.y ..:.1:!.icc:-or c:::-.ploy~e during t..l-i.e course of, t.hc pcrfor:71.::l.:lce of this agreement. ~nd arising·out cf, 17. Except as hereinafter provided, this ngrqernent shall tcrrnin.:i.tc on the 16th day of Januitrv , 19 no and at the option of the City, wit~ the consent and approval of the Governing Board of the District, may be renewed for successive periods.of time as agreed upon between th~ City and the District. 18. This agreement muy be terminated at any time by eith~r ) p~rty hereto upon sixty d~ys written notice. •. 7. e . .. -- - - . -.. .. .: -• "' :: i : -I 11 , t I • •. . ,: • I ~ ' .. . .. ' ( .. . . n -~- _, ,. ; . . ,, . _, I r- r - o. - -"' ( " " ) 0 _. , . . I .. . . :. r : : - -< ~, = : I ,. , , -~ !? . . .. . ; -- O> :: ~ a, - ~ ... . . 1i- ; I .. . . . ? ~- . -· . . . .. . #• .. . . :. • . . . : . . . · .. .,, . .. : . . '• -· -~ · : ~:. : :~ · . ::. . . . . I• - .. . .. .. .. . .. •. . . .. .. ,· . : ,i , Z ~ ~: S . ? " • ,l : . . . . .. . .. ·' . . , . •. • • . .. . I .. . • ·. ~ !• . / . .. '= ! .. .. . ~- : _: _: · ? · , ; : ; . ·. .. . . ·. · . ·, .· •. I ' .. ,. . ' . '~ .. . ' .. . . . . - ., . ~- ·. · . ; .. · •' .. 1 ~- ¢ - - . : .. .. .. . -. -. .. . . .. . .. . I• , ·= : - , , . .. .. ~. . .. . "' ~ \ . • i' ·. • .. . . : .. .. ·- ·: .. .. . :· -· .. . . •. - .. . ,. . .. . >a "' --t I . ' .- ... .. -: .. .. . :, , .. .. " ... "I I, " .. . ~ " .. . •~ , . ~ : , ~ , , . . , . , 7 I 11 0 U 01 , ... ,- ✓ • 7. J ... " .. . @ .. - II J" .. . Cl ., 1 o • I' .- - · .. .. · IN WI.Tm:$S wH:ElU:OF·, ~e parties have executed this agreement: on the day and year written above • i'\! .. !.:THA L. RAU'IENK.RA..~Z, City Clerk r.-tt~1 ~.t. Smith, Clerk APPI'.OVEO AS 'IO FORM: . C~TY OF c:AlU.SBAC, A Municipal . ~ Corporation of the State of C'1liforr.:..::. RONA.LO c •. PACKl\RD, l-4..ayor I 0 E?lCINITAS UNI0~1 ELEHEH'IAR~ SCSCOL DIS'!RICT Mary Lci.JSchultz, Presldent~ Board of ~rustees · Donald £. Liri4&qrn. up~.Hnfo'nder-.t and Secretary. Board of Trustet?s VINCENT F. BIONDO, J'R. City Attorney - tt. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-3 DWELLING UNIT TRANSFER RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORT June,2000 DATE: TO: FROM: sr AFF REPORT MAY 16, 1990 PL\NNlNG COMMISSION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DMSION ':PLiCATION Sl8M[7TAL D.-\7:: c:.CE~BER 12, 1989 G) St.'BJECT: LFMP 12-LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONE ~ I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 3040 recommending APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan 12 as amended. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Zone 12 is located in the southeastern quadrant of the Cicy adjacent to the northern edge of me City of Encinitas. (See Exhibit "A") The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 was originally adopted by the Cicy Council on February 23, 1988. That plan showed 556 acres of residential land with density ranges from low- medium (0-4 du/ ac) to medium-high (8-15 du/ ac) and 92 acres of open space. The base residential buildout for Zone 12 was projected at 2,067 dwelling units. The Cicy Council approved a dwelling unit transfer to Zone 11 of 179 dwelling units which lowered the projected bu.ildout total in Zone 12 to 1,888 units. The amendment to Zone 12 changes the land use, as identified previously. As shown on Exhibit ·a-Zone 12 the proposed land uses are primarily residential Of the Amended Plan's 669 cocal acres 512 are proposed for residential. Based on the proposed General Plan amendment accompanying this action, residential densities would range from low-medium (0-4 du.lac) co medium (4-8 du.lac). Nonresidential General Plan land uses would include 96 acres of Open Space, 2 acres of travel service/commercial. 3 acres of public: utilities, 41 acres of public schools and 1 S acres of roads. III. ANALYSIS 1. Does the proposed Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 12 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. . Is the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 12 consistent with and does it implement the 1986 Cicywide Facilici-es and Improvement Plan? LFMP 12 · HOFMAN PLWN1NG MAY 16, 1990 Page 2 3. How does this amendment differ from the Local Facilities Managemenc Plan for Zane 12 adopted in 1988? DISCL'SSTON The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the Citv' s adopted public facility performance standards as development occ:urs. The first step in chis proc~ss requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildour projection for chis zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly developmenc activiry. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in Ll-te 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased · demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. vVhere demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan proposes the necessary mitigation co maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Cicy·wide Facilities and Improvement Plan and the Growth Management Program. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 that was adopted in 1988 showed d1.e following net developable acreage by residential general plan land use: RLM = 366.2, R..\1 = 101.3, RMH = 25.0. There were 30 acres of future school dedication shown and 73.9 unconstrained acres of open space. The proposed amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 reflects the following proposed nee developable acreage by residential genual plan land use: RLM = 366.75, RM = 123.68. The refinement of requested development entitlements and additional environmental data modifies the school acreage to 40.7 acres while the unconstarined open space is now 61.9 acres. As the Growth Managmenc Program bases its analysis on the General Plan, the net developable acreage, and the Growth Management Control Points, other discretionary actions (ZC, CT, PUO, HOP, SOP, SUP, and ROI) are not pertinent to this discussion. The proposed amendment would result in a reduction of the potential buildout dwelling unit to cal ta 1,734 units after the transfer of 179 dwelling units into Zone 11. The amended zone plan has been brought up to date with current information, phasing, and conditions. The condition changes are more temporal than substantive and reflect an increased sophistication of the process rather than a recognition of a previously unheralded impact. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. LFMP 12 • HOFM.A.N ·•1.ANNING MAY 16, 1990 Page 3 FACILI1Y Cicy Ad.m.iniscrative Facilities Library ZONE 12 BUll.OOlrr PUBLIC FACJIJTIES SUMMARY SHEET LFMP 12 CONFORMANCE WITH ADOPTID PERFORMANCE STANDARD Existing and planned facilities will meet rhe adopted performance standard through buildout. Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. Wastewater Treatment Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted performance standard through the year 2000. Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) meets the adopted performance srandard through build out with the proposed mitigation. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with che proposed mitigation through build out. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with · the proposed mitigation through build out. Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted performance standard th.rough build our. Existing open space me-ets the adopted perfonnance standard for existing and approved projects. An ongoing work program will assure the open space performance standard through build out. Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the propo~ mitigation through build out. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through build out of the zone. Water facilities meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation through build out of the zone. LFMP 12 · HOFMAN PL\N~ MAY 16, 1990 Page 4 -..J r-1. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Planning Director has determined that the environmental effects of the project have alreadv been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefor;, no additional environmental review will be required and a Notice of Determination will be filed. A TI ACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3040 2. Exhibits - ·A· . Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones ·a· -Local Facilities Management Plan -12 General Plan Land Use Map ·c -Local Facilities Management Plan -12 Zoning Map BH:kd 4/26/90 1 2 3 4 5 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3040 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI1Y OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILmES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONE 12 ON PROPER1Y GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LEVANTE STREET, EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF TIIE CI1Y OF ENCINITAS, AND WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD. APPLICANT: HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILmES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT-ZONE 12 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred 7 to the Planning Commission, and 8 9 WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements . Plan establishing facility zones ·and-pertormance standards for 10 ll public facilities, and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requiring the processing of a, 13 Local Facilities Management Plan, and 14 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 and 9829 implementing 15 Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citizens of Carlsbad, and 16 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of May, 1990, the 6th day of 17 June, 1990, and on the 20th of June, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescn"bed by 18 law to consider said request; and 19 20 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 21 relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 12. 22 23 24 A) 25 B) 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: That the above recitations are true and correct That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Local Facilities Management Plan -Zone 12 as amended, based on the following findings and subject to the following condition: J. 2 3 4 Findings: 5 6 7 8 9 1) 2) 3) 10 4) 11 12 S) 13 That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 as amended is consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's General Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 as amended is consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), as amended by Ordinance No. 8110 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adopted 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 as amended and the conditions contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 -as mnendei:f will control the timing and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 as amended will ensure public facilities and services are available in conformance with the adopted performance standards prior to development occurring. 14 Condition 15 1) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -Zone 12 as amended and as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 12, dated May 16, 1990, incorporated herein by reference. 27 PC RESO NO. 3040 -2- 28 J. 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission 3 of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, 1990, by the following vote, 4 to wit: 5 6 7 8 9 AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, Marcus, McFadden & Hall. NOES: None. ABSENT: Connnissioner Erwin. 10 11 ABSTAIN: 12 ATTEST: 13 None. 14~ 15 MICHAELJ.HOZMR PLANNING DIRECTOR 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 3040 ~-~~ SHARON SCHRAMM, Cha.iiperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION -3- LONE 12 City of Carlsbad Local Facilities Management Plan --OJ QJ .u ::l a -..; e QJ (1J (/l (/J c:: 0 -..; .u -..; "O c:: 0 u 0 :,: .u '+-I 0 c:: • 0 0 •r-! Q'\ .u G\ -..; ....-l -a "O ~ ~ ..., N QJ .c w .:...J (/J ::, .c e.f\ •...J AB# iOt 7 LI ? MTG. 7/31/~ DEPT._G.:::.:M~-- err OF CARLSBAD -AGEND BILL TITLE: ZONE 12 -LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDED ACTION:"- DEPT.H~,-- CITY ATTY __ CITY MGR.~ The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City council ADOPT Resolution No. 90 -2.Co4, , APPROVING the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment for Zone 12. ITEM EXPLANATION The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 was originally adopted by the city Council on February 23, 1988. The base residential buildout of the zone was 2067 dwelling units. The city council approved a dwelling unit transfer to Zone 11 of 179 units which lowered the projected buildout to 1888 units. The amended plan reflects the General Plan amendments proposed by the Arroyo La Costa project. on June 20, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved this plan as described in the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting attached as Exhibit 4 . , ,~==;-~ere are 589 existing dwelling uni ts in the Zone. The amended ',/; projected residential buildout of the zone is 173 4 dwelling \} units after a dwelling unit transfer to Zone 11 of 179 units, 11 which is fully in compliance with Proposition E and the ~~ citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. The Plan is a regulatory document which analyzes all eleven public facilities to determine whether they conform with the adopted performance standards. Several facilities are identified as requiring upgrading in order to accommodate future development in the zone. Specifically, the Plan identifies needed improvements to drainage & circulation. Therefore, specific conditions of approval have been included in the Plan to guarantee that all of the public facility standards will continue to be met through buildout of the Zone. The conditions state that, prior to the first final map or issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 12, a financing plan must be approved by the City guaranteeing funding for construction of all public facility improvements identified in the Local Facilities Management Plan. Until this financing mechanism has been .approv;ed · by the City, no development will occur within Zone 12. Th_e co:inplete wording of the conditions is included in the Plan's Executive summary which is attached as Exhibit 2. Pl\GE 2 OF 1\GENDA BILL NO. /c) 7'{2.... ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that the environmental effects of the project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a Notice of Determination will be filed. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 will not cause any significant environmental impacts. The Plan is a public facilities planning document that implements Carlsbad's General Plan. The Plan makes generalized projections as to the demand for and supply of public facilities and outlines the provision of adequate public facilities concurrent with the estimated demands. The Plan recognizes that further environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act will be required prior to the development of any public or private project that is generally discussed in this plan. FISCAL IMPACT Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this Plan. These costs will be recovered through the processing fee established by the City Council. It is anticipated that further staff time will be necessary to monitor this Plan and other zone plans on a yearly basis. The implementing of this Plan, however, should help future fiscal planning by estimating the timing of future public facilities and their costs. EXHIBITS 1. City Council Resolution No. q· 0 ·2tc lf 2. Executive Summary -Zone 12 3. Planning corn.mission Resolution No. 3040 4. Excerpts of Planning Corn.mission Minutes dated June 20, 1990 l 2 3 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-26~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 12. WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been 5 prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 12 in accordance 6 with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 16, June 8 6 and June 20, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as 9 required by law to consider said plan and at the conclusion of 10 the hearing adopted Resolution No. 3040 making findings and ll recommendations that the City Council adopt a Plan; and 12 WHEREAS, the Planning Director has determined that 13 the environmental effects of the project have already been 14 considered in conjunction with previously 15 environmental documents and, therefore no certified additional environmental review will be required. 16 17 WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of July 31, 1990 held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all 18 19 testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City council of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 21 22 23 l. 2. That the above recitations are true and correct. That the findings and conditions of Planning 24 Commission Resolution No. 3040, on file with the City Clerk and 25 incorporated herein by ~ef erence constitute the findings of the 26 City Council in this matter except as amended by the addition 27 of the following conditions, are hereby approved: 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Planning Commission Resolution No. 3040 is amended by the addition of the following conditions: Conditions: l. 2. Prior to recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading perm.it or building perm.it, whichever occurs first within Zone 12, the zone is required to participate in any current City-wide comm.unity facilities district or provide an alternate financial guarantee to the satisfaction of the Finance Director for construction of the improvements included in the City-wide community facilities district. Prior to recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 12, a financing mechanism shall be approved guaranteeing construction of a proportional share of the following circulation improvements: Improvements needed prior to 1998: Rancho Santa Fe Road from Olivenhain Road to the southern Carlsbad City boundary shall be constructed to include the following: A. complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial standards; B. construction of four through travel lanes, two in each direction, to include intersection improvements including a fully landscaped median. 17 J. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 18 dated May 16, 1990 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated 19 herein by reference is hereby approved. Any development 20 occurring within the boundaries of Zone 12 shall comply with 21 all the terms and conditions of said Plan. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of l. the city Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 2 21st , day of _A_u_gu_s_t ____ , 1990 by the following vote, to 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin and Larson Council Member Pettine None 12 A.f/::ftff:: RA<T~lerk 13 14 (SEAL) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-4 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT June, 2000 "'RECORDED REQUEST OF First American Title SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad,CA 92008 632 DOC J 1998-0152412 MAR 20, 199B 2:38 PM ITTICUt RECIRDS SAN DIEGO COUNTV RECORDER'S IJFICE 6RE60RV J. SMITH, CCUfiV REIIIRJ(R FEES: 0.00 111111111111111 1998-0152412 Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT This 1996 Parks Agreement (" AGREEMENT") is made this J.,u,l., dayof ~ , 1997 between the City of Carlsbad, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("CITY") and Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware . . . - Corporation ("RECM"), successor-in-interest to the Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, agree as follows: RECITALS A. Between 1972 and the present there have been a series of agreements between the City and major land owners providing for park acquisition and development in the Southeast \,luadrant, summarized in Exhibit A ("Prior Parks Agreements") attached hereto. B. RECM is now the owner of more than 2,267 acres of development real estate within the City's Southeast Quadrant which encompasses all or portions of Local Facility Management Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Villages of La Costa".) Furthermore, RECM has become successor to the obligations of Fieldstone/La Costa Associates set forth in the 1982 Parks Agreement and all subsequent supplements, specifically the 1988 and 1990 Park Supplements. C. For purposes of this Agreement; the Villages of La Costa consists of the following: 1) The Southwest /Arroyo La Costa includes approximately 481.58 acres in Zone 12, is identified more specifically on Exhibit "B-1" and hereinafter referred to as "Southwest/Arroyo" or "CT 88-3". This property is currently the subject of an 1 [; ;(Jf I B I t 3 633 approved Tentative Tract Map for 1,076 single family dwellings and associated improvements. 2) The Southeast/Rancheros area consists of approximately 1,112 acres within Zone 11, as more specifically described on Exhibit "B-2" and hereinafter referred to as "Southeast/Rancheros. " 3) The Northwest area consists of approximately 674 acres located within Zone 10 (currently encumbered by the Deed of Trust referred to in Section 2, in favor of the City of Carlsbad). This property is more particularly described on Exhibit "B-3" and hereinafter referred to as "Northwest. " 4) Five (5) isolated, smaller parcels located within Zone 6 more specifically described on Exhibit "B-4" hereinafter referred to as "Remnants." D. As a result of significant change of circumstances and in order to satisfy a condition of Final Map approval for CT 88-3, the City and RECM now desire to modify, amend and fully restructure the Prior Parks Agreements by substituting in its entirety, this Agreement for all purposes to apply to future development of the Villages of La Costa with respect to provision of public parks under the park dedication requirements of the City's Growth Management Program and General Plan. Some of the changed circumstances include, but are not limited to: adjusted development product, areas and densities expected over the Villages of La Costa compared with the assumptions contained in the Prior Parks Agreements; the need for General Plan Amendments and associated Master Plan approvals for the Northwest and Southeast/Rancheros properties occasioned by Growth Management; the recently approved Habitat Conservation Plan, and development that has occurred elsewhere within the Southeast Quadrant on properties eligible to receive parkland credit under the Prior Parks Agreements, affecting the Southeast Quadrant's parks facilities requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals of facts set forth above and in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and obligations contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 2 634 1. Supersede Prior Parks Agreement This agreement is intended to fully supersede, replace and substitute for the Prior Parks Agreements for all purposes from and after the effective date of this agreement, and is intended to and shall constitute a novation of the Prior Parks Agreement with respect to future events. 2. Reconveyance of Deed of Trust. Under the Prior Parks Agreements, that certain Deed of Trust and Assignments of Rents, recorded April 14, 1988 as Document Number 88-172276 in favor of the City and encumbering the Northwest portion of the Villages of La Costa shall be fully reconveyed, released and extinguished by the City upon the recordation of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication as described in Section 4.2 below. RECM shall pay the cost, if any, of such reconveyance. 3. . Satisfaction of Villages of La Costa Parks Obligations. In addition to the City's Growth Management Program and implementing ordinances, the City has adopted the Quimby Act requirement for park land dedication, or the ... payment of fees-in-lieu thereof, in connection with Final Subdivision Maps. The ratio of parkland required under the City's applicable ordinances and policies is 3.0 acres per 1,000 population ( calculated at the rate of 2. 318 persons per single family detached unit), which dedication or payment of park fees-in-lieu thereof is required as a condition of Final Subdivision Map approval. RECM, or its predecessors in title, have dedicated substantial park acreage to the City in connection with prior project approvals consistent with the Prior Parks Agreements, including advance dedication of parkland in excess of that required for the development that has occurred to date on its land. 3.1 Carryover Parkland Dedication Credits. RECM is the beneficiary of prior excess parkland dedication credits consistent with the Prior Parks Agreements and predecessor agreements in the amount of 13 .841 acres as evidenced by the Schedule of Parkland Credits attached hereto, marked Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter "Existing Parkland Credits"). The Existing Parkland Credits are expressed as the number of parkland acres previously 3 635 dedicated in-excess and advance of prior-development requirements on property subject to the Prior Parks Agreements and which directly benefits and is available for future buildout of the Villages of La Costa. 3.2 Parks Requirements: Anticipated Buildout. Under the Parkland Dedication Requirements of three park acres per 1,000 population the reasonably expected additional parkland required for estimated buildout densities for the Villages of La Costa are as follows: Villages of La Costa Projected Units Parkland Requirements Southwest/ Arroyo 1,073 7.46 acres Northwest 1,000 6.9S acres Southeast/Rancheros 1,500 10.43 acres Total 3,573 24.84 acres of parkland The "Projected Units" and associated calculation of "Parkland Requirement" identified above for the Villages of La Costa (hereinafter "Future Parks Requirement") is the parties best current estimates, based on present development standards, of anticipated densities and future parkland requirements and is subject to upward or downward adjustments as further planning is finalized. In Southwest/ Arroyo, the 1,073 units represent the number of units set forth on the proposed final maps. With respect to the Northwest and the Southeast/Rancheros, the Projected Units are based on current estimates given by the City's Growth Management Program, midpoint density range, topographic considerations as well as consideration of the recent Habitat Conservation Plan for those areas. The resulting estimate for 24.84 acres of Future Parks Requirements is subject to adjustment, upward or downward, based on future approvals for the affected areas without the need for formal amendments to this Agreement. 3.3 Southwest/Arroyo Compliance. The parties agree that Southwest/ Arroyo shall utilize 7 .46 acres of the Existing Parkland Credits, leaving a net balance of 6.831 acres, and therefore, the Southwest/ Arroyo has fully satisfied all parkland dedication requirements, including Condition No. 4 of CT 88-3. 4 636 3.4 Application to Future Development. As the Northwest and Southeast/Rancheros projects obtain approved subdivision maps, RECM may elect to utilize any remaining Existing Parkland Credits, on a unit-by-unit basis, until all such Existing Parkland Credits are fully used. RECM shall notify the City of particular elections to utilize all or a portion of any existing Parkland Credits on one or more particular development projects by delivering to City, to the attention of the Community Development Director, the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credit Assignment Notice" in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D". The City agrees to recognize such election and not require an actual dedication of Parkland or Park-in-lieu fees on such project so long as Existing Parkland Credits remain available and are utilized for the particular project or portion thereof. The amount of remaining Existing Parkland Credits shall be adjusted from time to time in accordance with Section 3 .2 above. 3.5 Need for Park Access Dedication. In the event it becomes necessary for the City to improve Alga Norte Park as a result of a City Council declared Growth Management Failure prior to the time that access and utilities would otherwise be provided by development and RECM has obtained its first final map in the Northwest, RECM shall provide temporary a.) all weather two lane paved access, and b.) water, sewer and electricity to the Alga Norte Park boundary concurrent with development of said park to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Growth Management Program -Southeast Quadrant. The City is evaluating the need for and possible locations of future parkland to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Ordinance and the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The Parties hereto wish to provide for the possibility that such future parks demands may be satisfied from property located in the Northwest portion of the Villages of La Costa. 4.1 Alga Norte Park RECM hereby agrees to reserve (and offer to dedicate pursuant to Section 4.2 below) up to approximately 32.9 acres within the Northwest portion of the Villages of La 5 637 Costa property as a potential future site for Alga Norte Park. The park area is more particularly shown on the schematic drawing attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and is more fully set forth in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "F", both incorporated herein by this reference, (hereinafter "Alga Norte Park"), as satisfaction of Southeast Quadrant Requirements. 4.2 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication Concurrently with recordation of the Reconveyance of Deed of Trust described in Section 2 above, RECM shall execute and record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication in accordance with Government Code Section 7050 in the form attached hereto marked "Exhibit G" incorporated herein by this reference, ("Park IOD") for fee title to all or any portion of the Alga Norte Park. Acceptance of the Park IOD shall be expressly subject to each of the following terms and conditions. 4.3 Date of Acceptance/Rejection 4 .3 .1 City agrees to make its determination of the final configuration of the desired site for Alga Norte Park on or before the date of the approval of the first master • tentative map within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. -----------··--· ------------------ 4.3.2 If no master tentative map/is approved on the Northwest within two ye~s from the date of this agreement, the City may then, at any time accept all or any portion of the Park 1OD, but no later than the first final subdivision tract map for the Northwest. When City determines the final configuration, the City Council shall accept and record all or so much of the 32.9 acres as City determines necessary for said park. 4.3.3 !f the City does not acquire the entire 32.9 acre parcel, it will use its best efforts and good faith to reject a remainder parcel of such size and location as to be reasonably developable, consistent with future development of the balance of the Northwest. City and RECM shall use their best efforts and good faith to cooperate and mutually agree on any final configuration and issues of access, utilities and similar development issues affecting the portion to be accepted, and the balance of the property. The parties understand and acknowledge that roads, utilities and similar easements may be necessary and both parties intend to cooperate in 6 638 connection therewith, prior to as well as after the Park IOD and City's acceptance thereof. 4 .3 .4 If less than the entire parcel is accepted by the City, the City will record a rejection of the remainder of the Park 10D, Quitclaim Deed, or other instrument necessary to clear title to the remainder, at the same time as recordation of the acceptance. 4.4 Title Title to the Alga Norte Park property shall be free and clear of all monetary liens and other debilitating encumbrances which would have substantial adverse impact on the proposed park use at time of acceptance of all or any portion of the Park 10D, and RECM shall provide the City a preliminary title report for the City"s review and approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the City's anticipated acceptance date. If the City wishes to obtain title insurance, the City will be responsible for the cost of any such premiums. 4.5 Exterior Boundary Survey/Map RECM will cause the proposed Alga Norte Park acceptance parcel boundary to be surveyed within sixty (60) days of notification of the final boundary for purposes of acceptance by the City. To the extent that compliance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act is required, the City shall be solely responsible for satisfying, at its own expense, any subdivision map obligations, including certification through issuance of a Certificate of Compliance or other necessary instrument or map to create a legal parcel and that any remainder portion of the-approximately 32.9 Alga Norte Park Parcel are valid, legal parcel(s) within the Subdivision Map Act and applicable local ordinances or policies, including the provision of access to and utilities through the park and any remainder parcel 4.6 Cost of Acceptance The City shall cause the acceptance/rejection documents to be recorded and shall be responsible for any Title Insurance premium and any escrow fees shall be split equally between the parties. The parties agree that no documentary transfer taxes are payable based on_ the City's acceptance of all or any portion of the Park 10D. 7 639 4. 7 Payment Program If the City accepts the Park 10D in an amount in excess of the amount of total Parkland Requirement as computed in Section 3.2 as adjusted from time to time, the City shall pay RECM for such excess dedication. The amount of excess parkland shall be determined by subtracting the amount of parkland required in Section 3.2, as adjusted from time to time, from the number of acres actually accepted by the City under this Agreement, plus any remaining Existing Parkland Credits. The-totat·pa.yment, due RECM for excess parkland accepted, if any, by the City shall be equal to the amount of -excess parkland computed as described above times $175,000 per acre which amount shall be the total payment due. Payment to RECM shall be made from Park In-Lieu Fees collected in the Southeast Quadrant deemed to be available by the City Council at the earliest opportunity. If Park In-Lieu fees from the Southeast Quadrant are insufficient or unavailable to fully pay RECM the amount due under this section, the City shall annually review the amount of Park In-Lieu Fees received within the Southeast Quadrant and shall pay to RECM any fees that are deemed to be available by the City Council on a first priority basis until the total amount due bas been paid. No -~ interest shall accrue on any unpaid balance. The City shall in any event make the first payment under this section to RECM by the thirty-first day of July following the date of acceptance of the Park IOD. The City Council may, at its discretion, approve an earlier payment, if funds are available. The City is not obligated in any way to make payments to RECM from any source other than Park In-Lieu Fees collected in the Southeast Quadrant. 4.8 Accommodation in Northwest Master Plan RECM shall continue to include the location of the Park IOD in its future planning for the Northwest, and shall provide for alternative development should the City determine to satisfy all or a portion of the Southeast Quadrant Requirement from other property or in another manner. The parties agree to cooperate reasonably in the future planning process for the Northwest in order to achieve the purpose of this Agreement. 8 640 4.9 Abandonment by City If the City determines not to use the Park IOD for a park, it shall record a rejection of the entire Park IOD, Quitclaim Deed or other instrument necessary to clear title as reasonably requested or required by RECM as quickly as is reasonably possible but not later than one year following the determination by the City Council that the Park IOD is not desired. 4.10 Other Park Property It is currently the City's intent to accept and develop the Alga Norte Park, as described in this agreement, to meet the demands of the Growth Management Program for the Southeast Quadrant, subject to the conditions described in this agreement. The prior offer to dedicate park property in San Marcos Canyon is no longer intended to be accepted as described in the 1982 Parks Agreement. The City hereby agrees to identify and vacate, rescind or otherwise to proceed with the necessary actions to release the property to RECM within one year from execution of this agreement. 5. Responsible Parties The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notices or to receive written notice on behalf of the City and on behalf of the RECM in connection with the foregoing are as follows: For City: ForRECM: Community Development Director Mr. Marty Orenyak 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Real Estate Collateral Management James M. Jackson Vice President PO Box 9000-685 Carlsbad, CA 92018 6. Satisfaction of Southwest/ Arroyo Condition Execution of and compliance with this Agreement fully satisfies Condition No. 4 of the Conditions of Approval for the Southwest/ Arroyo tentative map as well as establishing full compliance with the parkland Dedication Requirements and all Southeast Quadrant 9 641 park requirements of the Carlsbad Growth Management Program, or other Carlsbad ordinances, policies or procedures including the implementation of the Quimby Act applicable to the Villages of La Costa. 7. General Provisions. 7 .1 Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties their respective assigns and successors, and the successive owners of the Villages ofLa Costa, provided, however, payment for any excess parkland and the assignment of Existing Parkland Credits to specific properties shall be the personal property of RECM. Credits and payments may be made available to subsequent purchasers of portions of the Villages of La Costa property to satisfy the future Parkland Dedication Requirement of said subdividers as directed by RECM based upon receipt of written authorization by City from RECM in the form of the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credits Assignment Notice," attached hereto as Exhibit "D," indicating the amount of such credit or payment to be made to subsequent subdividers of Villages of La Costa. RECM shall provide the City with such written notice of the transfer or a separate .. notice of any non-transfer of the rights to receive payment or credits within thirty (30) days of the transfer of any property subject to this Agreement. Should for any reason the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credits Assignment Notice" or separate notice of non-transfer not be provided to the City, then the City shall not allocate any payment ,or credit ,or reimbursement, to any other property. 7 .2 Construction. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole in accordance with its fair meaning, the captions being for the convenience of the parties only and not intended to describe or define the provisions and the portions of the Agreement to which they penain. Both parties acknowledge that they understand the terms and conditions of this Agreement and execute the Agreement without force or duress. Neither party shall deny the enforceability of any provision of this Agreement on the basis that it did not have legal counsel, or that it did not understand a term or condition of this Agreement. Both parties to this Agreement acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel 10 and/or advisors of their own choice and that neither party shall be deemed to have primary responsibility for drafting this Agreement. 7.3 Waiver No waiver by either party of any default, breach, or any other term set forth herein shall constitute a waiver of any other default, breach or term whether of the same or any other convenant or condition. 7.4 Severability If any portion of this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall be given its_ full and fair meaning in order to effectuate the purposes of this agreement. 7 .5 Amendments No change or addition to this agreement, or aily part or portion thereof, shall be valid unless in writing and signed by all parties hereto. 7 .6 Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto respecting the subject matter covered. This Agreement supersedes and replaces-any and all previous discussions, negotiations and writings between the parties hereto, superseding and replacing all negotiations, prior discussions, preliminary _agreements,. the Prior Parks Agreements or understanding respecting the subject matter whether written or oral. 7.7 No Third Party Beneficiary Nothing contained herein is intended nor shall be construed as benefiting any third party, or member of the public, nor shall it create or authorize any claims, causes of action or any legal proceedings to interrupt or enforce this Agreement other than by the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. Its: Mayor City Clerk ) APPROVED AS TO FORM: )..f;c~~ REAL EST A TE COT..l. A T-PRAL MANAGEMENT ,poration 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) ss. ) 6.44 On 11/27/96 , before me1 Vivian Mae Walters, personally appeared James M. Jackson and Spi.ro G. Kai.las , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within i~strument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on th~ instrument the person{s), or the entity upon behalf of which· the person(s} acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,tu.WU~~ Notary Public in and for said County and State [SEAL] r•e• t o o t\lMAN MAE WALTERS ., COMM.# 1052531 i < _ , · Notary Pu,lc -Colfornla ?:. J . !Ii. 2 SAN DIEGO COUNlV : • ., ~--· . My comm. Expires MAR 1. 1999 "EXHIBIT A" Historical Summary 645 A. Toe previous parks agreements and supplements hereto, and the parties to those agreements have been: 1. "1973" Parks Agreement" -City and La Costa Land Company 2. Supplements to the 1973 Parks Agreement (October 15, 1973 and July 18, 1974) - City and La Costa Land Company 3. · "1978 Parks Agreement" -City and La Costa Land Company 4. "1982 Parks Agreement" -City and Daon Corporation S. "1988 Parks Supplement" (to the 1982 Parks Agreement) -City and BCE Development Company 6. Parks Agreement Subrogation (Fieldstone Company) -City and Continental Bank 7. "1990 Parks Supplement" (to the 1982 Parks Agreement) -City and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Limited Partnership B. The 1973 Parks Agreement, all supplements thereto, and the 1978 Parks Agreement, were superseded by the 1982 Parks Agreement. As a result, those agreements and supplements preceding the 1982 Parks Agreement are of no further in force and effect. C. The 1982 Parks Agreement intendedto_(l)_satisfy the 1980 Master Plan requirements for a parks agreement, (2) allow for an accelerated dedication of the La Costa North Community Park (hereinafter referred to as Alga Norte Park) (3) continue the dedication of the Stagecoach Park at an accelerated rate until the full park site of 28 ~cres was dedicated, (4) delete the San Marcos Creek Park site; and (5) provide instead for the dedication of the portions of the San Marcos Canyon which had not been dedicated previously. D. The 1988 Parks Supplement to the 1982 Parks Agreement was a necessary amendment to the existing agreement as part of an ongoing planning process, the implementation of the City's Growth Program and the adoption of the Public Facilities Performance Standards in 1986. Furthermore, the 1988 supplement was intended to do the following: (1) satisfy the Master Plan requirements for parks acreage; and (2) allow for the accelerated dedication and joint financing of the construction of improvements for Alga Norte Community Park. The accelerated dedication of Alga Norte Park required BCED, (succeeded by Fieldstone) to dedicate 35 acres of parkland prior to the time the actual parkland requirements would be determined (normally, as the revised Master Plan for LFMP Zone 10 was prepared and approved). Provisions for reimbursement of parkland dedication over and above those requirements ultimately identified through the eventual Master Plan approval process, were also specified. To date, the revised Master Plan has not been submitted for approval, nor adopted by the City. In order to guarantee availability of funding to construct improvements for the Alga Norte Park site ( or a portion thereof) and therefore meet the requirements of the Growth Management 14 646 Program, provisions to guarantee $2,241,265 from BCED, (successor; Fieldstone) to construct improvements for 19.4 acres of the 35 acre Alga Norte site were also specified. The agreement to provide the advanced dedication for 35 acres of parkland and $2,241,265 for construction of improvements was secured by a Deed of Trust in favor of the City of Carlsbad encumbering the entire 765.9 acres of the property owned by BCED (successor; Fieldstone) located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. Upon receipt by the City of appropriate documentation dedicating the 35 acres of parkland and upon delivery and acceptance of a letter of credit in the amount of $2,241,265 as substituted security for park improvements construction, at the time of recordation of the first final map of property owned by BCED, (successor; Fieldstone) in Local Facilities Management Zone 12, the City agreed to reconvey the Deed of Trust. The City currently retains the Deed of Trust for 765.9 acres of land in Local Facility Management Zone 10, because the advanced dedication of 35 acres of parkland and the $2,241,265 for construction has not occurred as specified in the 1988 Parks Supplement. E. Subsequent to the execution of the 1988 Parks Supplement, the property then owned by BCED was sold to the Fieldstone Company/La Costa Associates, Limited. Partnership; transferred to Continental Bank; acquired by Bank of America; and most recently transferred by Bank of America to its real estate subsidiary, Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware Corporation (RECM). F. On May 22, 1990 an additional supplement to the 1982 Parks Agreement (1990 Parks Supplement) was approved by the City of Carlsbad between the City and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates limited partnership. The 1990 Supplement specifically amended the 1982 Parks Agreement to include rather than exclude the subdivision property known as Santa Fe Knolls Unit 3 (CT 85-5). Consequently, Park Dedication credits were accepted, acknowledged and accounted for as indicated on the Stagecoach Community Park "Park Dedication Inventory Matrix" dated March 6, 1990 (reference Carlsbad City Council Agenda Bill #10,626), including Santa Fe Knolls Unit 3. 15 ·• '., i' r: l ! ~ ·~ BY-ff ( Dl I SL\J· S-647 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SOUTH 02°31'38" EAST, 340.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY SOUTH 02°31'38" EAST, 468.13 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, SOUTH 03°29' 27" EAST, 760 .00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03°29'27" EAST, 1869.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, SAID CORNER BEING IN THE CENTER LINE OF OLIVEHAIN ROAD, ACCORDING TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 1631, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10 AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 87°03' 30" EAST, 509.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 02°56'30" EAST TO SAID POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF SAN. DIEGO COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 454 (KNOWN AS RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD) AS .. DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1930 IN BOOK 1731, PAGE 4 OF DEEDS; THENCE.LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°30' 00" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87°30'00" WEST, 3350.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM LOTS 1 THROUGH 86 INCLUSIVE OF SANTA FE RIDGE UNIT NO. 2, CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 83-16, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10857, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 28, 1964. -~ AFFECTS PARCEL NOS .. 255-031-24 AND 255-031-25. PARCEL G: LOT 13 OF LA COSTA CANADA, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7205, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON FEBRUARY 15, 1972. AFFECT PARCEL NO. 216-320-13. PAGE 26 .. ·· .. ·-~---~ .--:~--~~~t·~· _.~:~ .. ~~~--~···,. ~xrt:1:e;,r e. 2•:,oC' 648 <SB JI" ORDER NO. 1126324-ll LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 o \J'il:tlSA-5-T _n:- THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL X: LOTS AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 6 AND LOT 8 OF RANCHO LAS.ENCINITAS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNI.l\, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27-, 1898. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 75-9(B) UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 9959, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 31, 1980 AND THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 13524, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 25, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-403293 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH~RLY BOUNDARY THEREOF. - ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTERLINE OF LA COSTA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON HEREINBEFORE MENTIONED PARCEL MAP NO. 13524; THENCE NORTH 55°00'00" EAST 200.89 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF HEREINBEFORE MENTIONED LOT S OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-060-15, 223-060-49 AND 264-222-03. PARCEL AA: THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 32 AND THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 31, ALL BEING IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. T:11/17/95 11:12:40 V: / / MF CO PAGE 26 LEGAL DESCRIPTION :50U'11;tW·sst" ..:..:. --.. 649 ... ,,,. . --. --. ORDER NO. 1126321-11 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL C: ALL OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF FRACTIONAL SECTION_ l_AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 2, IN TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH,_ RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, NORTH 76°21'30" EAST, 892.92 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 OF FRACTIONAL SECTION l; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 1°35'31" EAST, 1094.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 1, NORTH 89°17' 26" WEST, 1683. 77 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 2, NORTH 89°17'41" WEST, 993.40 FEET AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXECUTORS' DEED AND CONSERVATORS DEED TO W. B. DALITZ, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19; 1969 AS FILE NO. 164971 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAND SOUTE 68°25' 31 11 WEST, 1851. 09 FEET TO AN ANGLE PO INT AND SOUTH 5 6 ° 3 0 ' 2 8 " WEST, 110 0 . 6 4 FEET TO A PO INT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ROAD SURVEY NO. 1800-1, BEING THAT CERTAIN 90 FOOT STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXECUTOR'S DEED AND CONSERVATORS' DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1970 AS FILE NO. 27777 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND ALSO BEING A POINT IN A NON-TANGENT 1970. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 58°40' 29 11 WEST; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY AS FOLLOWS: T:11/17195 10:27:24 V: / / JL 00 PAGE 22 650 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A.N ANGLE OF 4°56' 20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 169.81 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 36°15'51" EAST, 291.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 2045.00 FOOT R.F,J)IUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN A.NGLE OF 32°30'56" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1160.54 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH, 3 °44' 55" EAST, 1061. 59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 9045.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 3°01'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 477.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE HEIRS OR DEVISEES OF FRIEDA C. WIEGAND, DECEASED, ET AL, RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1971 AS FILE NO. 35748 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, RADIAL TO LAST SAID CURVE NORTH 89°16'23" EAST, 398.31 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 20°02'35" EAST, 686.02 FEET TO A.N INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 12 OF SAID RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 87°30' 15" EAST, 698.33 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 2505.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 2°55'51" WEST, 2107.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 2107.50 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 87°30'15" EAST, 2505.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 2°55'51" WEST, 526.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 NORTH 1°58'05" WEST, 807.94 FEET TO THE POINT .9F BEGINNING . . ?F'ECTS PARCEL NOS. 255-010-24, 255-010-25, 255-022-01, 255-030-11, 255-030-12, 255-030-13, 255-041-18, 255-041-19 AND 255-041-20. PARCEL D: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALSO THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ALSO THE WEST 50 ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 23 . /~ .· . ~~ .. ~~-/. • •.. · .. !: : 651 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35, NORTH 89°07'13" WEST, 1318.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF, SOUTH 0°33'46 11 WEST, 2649.70 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 °18' 14 11 WEST, 50. 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ROAD SURVEY NO. 1800 -1 EL CAMINO REAL -ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON- TANGENT 3030.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 74°59'19 11 EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°09'33" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 325. 73 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 8°51'08" EAST, 288.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1970.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; Tr!ENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°28'17" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 772.64 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 56°30'28" EAST, 1100.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68°25'31" EAST, 1851.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 5 0 ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST SO ACRES NORTH 0°33'05 11 EAST, 1323.11 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST SO ACRES NORTH 89°18'37" WEST, 1646.40 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NoRr.H 0°34'20" EAST, 1322.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT No·.. 75-7 GREEN VALLEY KNOLLS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8379, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-24, SPANISH VILLAGE UNIT NO. l, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7895, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. AFFECTS PARCEL' NOS. 255-010-19, 255-010-26 AND 255-010-27. PARCEL E: ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF AND ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 24 B)<ttr.B1 r 5VJ 4--652 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SOUTH 89°51'26" EAST, 280.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71°00'00" EAST, 1545.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING SOUTH 71°00'00 11 WEST, 1545.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°51'26" WEST, 280.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION l, T0WNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°51'52" WEST, 956.82 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID SECTION l; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 1094.53 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 7 5 ° 4 7' l 0" WEST, 8 9 2 . 9 2 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SOUTH 02°32'35" EAST; 340.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 87°30'00 11 EAST, 3350.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 454 -KNOWN AS RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1930 IN BOOK 1737, PAGE 4 OF DEEDS; THENCE NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 52°00'00 11 EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 52°00'00" WEST, 485.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY Al.'ID NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 73-2 {SANTA FE GLENS), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACC.ORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8059, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 22, 1975. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 255-030-09. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3, 4, 9 AND 10 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 25 653 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 31, ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 (LA COSTA VALE) UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST ONE HALF OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST ONE HALF, 2689.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH O O O 3 6' 3 8 11 WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST ONE HALF, 3120.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE, NORTH 64°13'23" WEST, 2226.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 200. 00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64°13'23" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 1583.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 64°13'23 11 WEST TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SAID INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF TERMI~S. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 7950, SAID CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 1230.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 51 ° 54' 08 11 WEST; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'46" A DISTANCE OF 312.99 FEET, NORTH 38°50'03" EAST, 31.80 FEET. TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1480. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°19'57 11 A DISTANCE OF 189.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH, 46°10'00 11 EAST, 1057.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THBNCE··. LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 43 ° 50' 00" EAST, 1685. 42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53°39'32" EAST, 42.00 FEET.TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 53°39'32 11 EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO PAGE 27 -·; '·. :.\;.·' ·, \',:.,,,( . ... ,.. • I 654 ~ ~ ORDER NO. 1126324-11 THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SAID INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS. ALSO EXCEPTING THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1967 AS FILE NO. 21426 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THOSE PORTIONS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 66398-A: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60 FEET WIDE, 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTER LINE: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, A PLAT OF WHICH IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER BEING DISTANT ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 721.98 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING ENGINEER'S STATION 194 PLUS 74.85, POINT ON A 1000 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY ON SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE AS FOLLOWS: SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID 1000 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, 36.54 FEET AND TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 7°22' EAST, 12.41 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A 1200 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 82°38' WEST FROM SAID .POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTER LINE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°50', A DISTANCE-OF 1504.47 FEET TO ENGINEER'S STATION 210 PLUS 87.12 P_9INT OF TERMINATION ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 454. PARCEL 66398-B: THAT PORTION OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING SOUTHERLY OF PARCEL 66398-A HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, AND NORTHERLY OF SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 454. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO MAG PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-057460 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 494 OF MAP NO. 7950, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE SOUTH 31°00'00" WEST, 46 .04 PAGE 28 l\ ,,.;; . ~ >\,. ,-. ~ -~~ 655 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59°00'00" EAST, 71.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT 1520.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID ·BOUNDARY LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9°19'02", A DISTANCE OF 247.18 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT 700. 00 FOOT RADIUS REVERSING CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 73°26'32" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 700.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°43'55", A DISTANCE OF 326.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10°10'27" EAST, 474.67 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 2400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°24'49", A DISTANCE OF 645.64 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 1170.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31°17'17" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 1170.00 CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°·14'41", A DISTANCE OF 127.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25°02'36" EAST, 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 1230. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 25°02'36" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", A DISTANCE OF 488.47 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT 2400.00 RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 33°56'33" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 2400. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°35'06", A DISTANCE OF 317.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°31'39" EAST, 63. 0 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 ° 50' 25" EAST, 265. 0 9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°21'27" WEST, 501.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°16'32" EAST 62.63 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 700.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL A,NGLE OF 30°22' 01", A DISTANCE OF 371.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°21'27" WEST, 470.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7° 59' 01", A DISTANCE OF 139.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53°39'32" WEST, 42.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°50'00" WEST, 1685.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°10'00" EAST, 465.5..8. FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1520. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5 ° 50' 58", A DISTANCE OF 155. 18 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-050-67 AND 223-050-69; 223-071-05 AND 223-071- 07. PAGE 29 656 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 PARCEL BB: THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING PARCELS 223-050-51, 223-050-52, 223-050-53, 223- 050-54, 223-050-59, 223-050-65 AND 223-071-09 LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2689.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'38fl WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 3120.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMENT, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE, NORTH 64°13'23fl WEST, 2226.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45. 00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64°13'23fl WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 1583. 36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO. MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, -FI-LED-IN-THE-GFFICE--OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974; THENCE NORTH 31°00' 00 fl EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE, 45.19 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE NORTH 64 ° 13' 23 fl WEST ALONG_ THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950, A DISTANCE OF 1326.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°30'00" WEST 477.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 1720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 43 °30' 00 fl WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 85.06 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 43°40' WEST 445.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 455. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 768.98 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 39°30'00" WEST 153.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 780.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°59'38'' A DISTANCE OF 122. 44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7779, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 26, 1973; THENCE LEAVING SAID MAP NO. 7950 AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7779, NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 71°00'00fl WEST 269.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°00'00" WEST 965.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71°13'23" WEST 276.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°46'50" WEST 2 9 0 . 2 5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 5 9 ° 5 0 ' 0 0 " WEST 121 . 2 3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°40'00" WEST 114.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°40'00" WEST 230.00 FEET; PAGE 30 ,. I , , '" : I ~ ···~ 657 ~~~~. ~ ~ •,~ /.::~,_~~ ORDER NO. 1126324-11 THENCE SOUTH 28°20'30" WEST 436.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18°27'30" EAST 218 . 11 FEET ; THENCE SOUTH 2 5 ° 0 3 ' 2 8 " WEST 16 5 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE NOR TH 64°56'32" WEST 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'13" WEST 110.03 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 100.00 FOOT EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7779 AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID EASEMENT NORTH 64°56' 32 11 WEST TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 75-4 (LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8302, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 5, 1976; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 25°03'28 11 EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°02'10 11 WEST 495. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 ° 25' 10" EAST 280. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°30'00" WEST 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 36°55'10" EAST 345.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52°15'00" EAST 160.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF MAP NO. 8302 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, SOUTH 26°58'00" EAST 346.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°43-'11 11 EAST 880.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°13'10 11 EAST 281. 25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 9 ° 46' 54" EAST 1 70. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°42'30" EAST 530.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°24'35" EAST 174.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'20 11 EAST 145.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°29'10 11 EAST 309 .. 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°00'21" EAST 145.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°27'00" EAST 113.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85°44'40" EAST 271.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31°5_7'15 11 EAST 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°25'05" EAST 129.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 2607.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 8302. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF · SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST, 950.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°28'50" WEST, 341.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°42'49" WEST, 456.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°12'27" WEST 2 3 0 . 3 7 FEET TO THE TRUE PO INT OF BEG INNING; THENCE NORTH O 0 3 6' 31" EAST, 77.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°23'29 11 WEST, 350.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°36'31 11 WEST, 265.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°28'07 11 EAST. 68.28 PAGE 31 -.. ;: ;•I' ' I 658 I ~-~ ORDER NO. 1126324-11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55°28'26" EAST 34.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°10'26" EAST, 7 6 . 6 9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8 9 ° 2 3 ' 2 9 " EAST, 110 . 0 0 FEET ; THENCE NORTH 78°04'47 11 EAST, 92.20 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, NORTH 0°36'31" EAST, 263.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY HALF OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89°53'42 11 EAST _496.36 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 0°06'18 11 WEST, 210.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST, 237.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 470 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°03'42", A DISTANCE OF 295.82 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 53°50'00" EAST, 386.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°24'00" WEST, 30.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 6 3 ° 4 2 ' 0 0 11 EAST, 4 2 4 . 18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7 6 ° 4 0 ' O O " EAST, 2 8 8 . 3 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O O O O O ' 0 0 11 WEST, 81 . 0 0 FEET ; THENCE SOUTH 72°49'00" WEST, 288.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°32'30" WEST, 628.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°08'00" WEST, 618.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°36'00" WEST, 18 7 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE NOR TH 2 ° 5 6 ' 0 0 " EAST, 16 6 . 2 0 FEET; THENCE · NORTH 20°05'30" EAST, 530.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3--WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS ... FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30 AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'11" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 48.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 31°32'16" WEST 247.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89°43'11" EAST, 145.34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROPOSED RANCHO SANTA FE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 12 ° 22' 42" WEST, 22.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1137 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°17'27" A DISTANCE OF 144.68 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 69°00'00" WEST, 172.47 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE NORTH 31°32'16" EAST, 115.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 32 659 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-071-09, 223-050-51, 223-050-52, 223-050-53, 223-050-54, 223-050-59, 223-050-65. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT INSURABLE. PARCEL CC: THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIE.GO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-011-02, 223-011-03, 223-032-01 AND 223-032-02. PARCEL DD: THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING PARCELS 223-011-4, 223-011-5, 223-011-6, 223- 021-8 AND 223-011-11 LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 17, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED "NOT A PART" ON SAID PARCEL MAP. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) UNIT NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10243, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 20, 1981. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) PHASE VI, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE 0~ CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10820, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN .DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 13, 1984, AND CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 84-23, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 11241, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 22, 1985. PAGE 33 ' ' 660 ORDER NO. 1126324-ll ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 9182, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 28, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-332144 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 7, 1966 AS FILE NO. 58549 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA COSTA MEADOWS, UNIT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 6095 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EL FUERTE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6905; THENCE NORTH 68°13'07" EAST 1536.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEG INNING; THENCE SOUTH 6 8 ° 01 ' 10 " EAST 9 9 . 51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51°54'40" EAST 141.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°52'25" WEST 191.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°13'00" WEST 73.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°46'00" WEST 185.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°25'48" WEST 144.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°34'12" EAST 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 322-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°35'22" A DISTANCE OF 188.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-011-04, 223-011-05, 223-011-06; 223-021-08, 223-021-11. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT INSURABLE. PAGE 34 \7 .. . . LEGAL D~~CRIPTION Rl<N.Otr6"-0S . 661 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING 223-050-43, 223-050-49 AND 223-010-31 AND LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL BB: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 3 2 ; AND THE NORTH HALF OF .SECTION 31; AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, ALL BEING IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 6, IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2689.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00°36' 38" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 3120. 35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMENT, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN .DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE, NORTH 64°13'23" WEST, 2226.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200. 00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64°13' 23 11 WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 1583.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974; THENCE NORTH 31°00'00" EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE, 45.19 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE NORTH 64°13'23" WEST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950, A DISTANCE OF 1326.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°30'00" WEST 477.59 FEET TO THE BEGINlfI_N'G OF A NON-TANGENT 1720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 43°30'00" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 85.06 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 43°40' WEST 445 .15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 455 . 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96° SO' 00 11 A DISTANCE OF 768.98 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 39°30'00 11 WEST 153.Sl PAGE 27 662 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 780.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°59' 38" A DISTANCE OF 122 .44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7779, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 26, 1973; THENCE LEAVING SAID MAP NO. 7950 AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7779, NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 269.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°00'00" WEST 965.00 FEET· THENCE NORTH 71°13'23" WEST 276.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°46'50" WEST 290.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59°50'00" WEST 121.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°40'00" WEST 114.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°40'00 11 WEST 230.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 28°20'30" WEST 436.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18°27'30" EAST 218.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25°03'28" WEST 165.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°56'32" WEST 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'13" WEST 110.03 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 100.00 FOOT EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF SAID MA.P · NO. 7779 AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID EASEMENT NORTH 64°56'32" WEST TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. ·75_4 (LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH}, IN TH_E CITY O-F CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8302, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 5, 1976; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 25 °03 I 28" EAST 100. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03 ° 02, 10 II WEST 495. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°25'10" EAST 280.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°30'00" WEST 130. 00 FEET; -THENCE NORTH 36° 55' 10" EAST 345. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52°15'00" EAST 160.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF MAP NO. 8302 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, SOUTH 26°58'00" EAST 346.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 880.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°13'10" EAST 281.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°46'54" EAST 170.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°42'30" EAST 530.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°24'35" EAST 174.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'20" EAST 145.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°29'10 11 EAST 309.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°00' 21" EAST 145 .SO FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°27' 00" EAST 113. 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85°44' 40" EAST 271. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31°57'15" EAST 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°25'05" EAST 129.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 2607.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLX BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 8302. PAGE 28 • • I ·-~-~:•~~ 663 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 2, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 0°36'3l" WEST, 950.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°28'50" WEST, 341.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°42'49" WEST, 456.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°12'27" WEST 230.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°36'31 11 EAST, 77.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°23'29" WEST, 350.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST, 265.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°28'07 11 EAST, 68.28 FEETi THENCE SOUTH 55°28'26 11 EAST 34.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°10'26" EAST, 76.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'29" EAST, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°04'4711 EAST, 92.20 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, NORTH 0°36' 3111 EAST, 263.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY HALF OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89 ° 53' 42" EAST 496. 36 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 0°06'18" WEST, 210.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST, 237.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 470 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY;. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE.THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°03'42 11 , A DISTANCE OF 295.82 FEET;, THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 53°50'00 11 EAST, 386.84 FEET; THENCE ·SOUTH 35°24'0011 WEST, 30.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°42'00 11 EAST, 424.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76°40'00" EAST, 288.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH.00°;0Q'00" WEST, 81.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°49'00" WEST, 288.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°32'30" WEST, 628.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°08'00" WEST, -Gl.8 .. 80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°36'00" WEST, 187.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°56'00 11 EAST, 166.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°05'30 11 EAST, 530.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. . ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 29 664 ORDER NO. 1126322-ll COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30 AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE SOUTH 89 °43' 11" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 48.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 31°32' 16" WEST 247 .14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89°43' 11" EAST, 145. 34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROPOSED RANCHO SANTA FE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 12°22'42" WEST, 22.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 11~7 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°17'27" A DISTANCE OF 144.68 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 69°00'00" WEST, 172.47 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE NORTH 31°32'16" EAST, 115.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-050-43, 223-050-49, 223-010-31. ~TE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE . INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT I INSURABLE . ! THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO \ ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING 223-010-12, 223-010-18, 223-010-19, 223-010--27, I \ 223-010-28, 223-010-29, 223-010-32, 223-010-33, 223-010-34, 223-010-35, \ 223-010-37, 223-021-9, 223-021-10, 223-021-12, 223-021-15, 223-021-16, i \ 222-470-23 AND 222-470-25 AND LYING WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED i PROPERTY: \ PARCEL DD: PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 17, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED "NOT A PART" ON SAID PARCEL MAP. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) UNIT NO. l, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10243, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 20, 1981. PAGE 30 1; I ( . ' \· I 665 & .. -~ ORDER NO. 1126322-11 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) PHASE VI, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10820, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 13, 1984, AND CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 8~-23, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 11241, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 22, 1985. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 9182, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 28, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-332144 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 7, 1966 AS FILE NO. 58549 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA COSTA MEADOWS, UNIT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 6095 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EL FUERTE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6905; THENCE NORTH 68°13'07" EAST 1536.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ·-soUTH 68°01'10" EAST 99.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51°54'40" EAST 141.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°52'25" WEST 191.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°13'00" WEST 73.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°46'00" WEST 185.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°25'48" WEST 144.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°34'12" EAST 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 322-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°35'22" A DISTANCE OF 188.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-010-12, 223-010-18, 223-010-19, 223-010-27, 223- 010-28, 223-0lC-29, 223-010-32, 223-010-33, 223-0i0-34, 223-010-35, 223- 010-37; 223-021-09, 223-021-10, 223-021-12, 223-021-15 AND 223-021-16; 222-470-25 AND 222-470-23. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT INSURABLE. PAGE 31 '---------·------ 666 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 PARCEL EE: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13900, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 6, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-281626 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 222-151-80. PAGE 32 667 ORDER NO. 1126323-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1188, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 20, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340334 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS PARCEL "A" IN DEED TO LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1973 AS FILE NO. 73-245058 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID LAND BEING THAT.PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED AS "NOT A PART OF THIS MAP" ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 1188. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF ALGA ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13427, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 16, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-031333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 213-030-11, 215-021-07, 215-030-06, 215-030-14, 215-031-08, 215-052-15 AND 215-061-01, 09. PARCEL A-1: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13427, IN THE CITY OF-CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 16, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-031333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, FOR THE PURPOSES SET OUT IN THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-335690 AND RE-RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86-078338, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: T: ll/16195 12:02:38 V: / / • . JL 00 PAGE 26 668 ORDER NO. 1126323-ll BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL A, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 13427; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL A, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTH 5°12' 03 11 EAST, 409 .16 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1,000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°15'34" A DISTANCE OF 371.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16°03'31" WEST I 243.88 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°17'29" A DISTANCE OF 237.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°13'58" EAST, 60.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 800.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°34'36" A DISTANCE OF 371.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°39'22" EAST, 311.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE , THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°36'09" A DISTANCE OF 163.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°56'47" WEST, 56.41 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°48'2611 A DISTANCE OF 207. 42 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 450. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44 °43' 38 11 A DISTANCE OF 351. 29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°51'59 11 WEST, 263.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400. 00 FOOT RADIUS .. CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'50 11 A DISTANCE OF 254.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°16'49" WEST, 495.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33°21'02" WEST, 99.22 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 74°16'49" EAST, 516.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 450. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY .. ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'50 11 A DISTANCE OF 285.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37°5l.' 59 11 EAST, 315.-82 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 4 ° l 6 ' 12" A DISTANCE OF 287.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03°35'47" EAST, 281.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5°49'18" EAST, 228.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8°22'00" WEST, 100.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°39'22" WEST, 211.48 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 825.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°34'36" A DISTANCE OF 382.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°13'58" WEST, 60.63 FEET,. TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 275.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°17'29" A DISTANCE OF 217.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°03'31" EAST, 243.88 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1,025.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°15'34" A DISTANCE OF 380.32 PAGE 27 669 ORDER NO. 1126323-11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 ° 12' 03" WEST, 407. 20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DOCUMENT; THENCE NORTH 89°16' 23" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF 25.08 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 57 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 6800, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 9, 1970; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID UNIT NO. l AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 60°37'21" EAST, 549.65 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ALGA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6800, BEING A POINT IN THE ARC OF A 949 FOOT RADIUS CURVE. CONCAVE NORTHERLY A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 42°42' 01" EAST TO SAID POINT, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 32°40'34" A DISTANCE OF 541.22 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 79°58'33" WEST, 670 FEET TO A TANGENT 949 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 25°54'00" A DISTANCE OF 4 2 8 . 9 9 FEET AND SOUTH 15 ° 5 2 ' 3 3 " WEST 5 0 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LA COSTA VALLEY UNIT NO. 4, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 5781, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 5781 AS FOLLOWS: WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 999 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 23°22'00" A DISTANCE OF 407.42 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 50°44'00" WEST, 398 FEET TO A TANGENT l.,001 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 38°30'58" A DISTANCE OF 672.91 FEET, NORTH 89°14'58" WEST, 98.00 FEET AND NORTH 0°45'02" EAST, 17.00 FEET TO--THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°14'58" EAST, 161.14 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25 SOUTH 89°12'29 11 EAST, 2,321.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THAT PORTION OF ALGA ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 215-480-02 AND 215-480-03. PAGE 28 -----------------------~-- L u ~0iT R~~a~, fQ\RCeC-RDER LEGAL DESCRIPTION t-.eJVONVf~ 670 NO. 1126305-11 . THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL J; THAT PORTION OF LOT 249 OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7457, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTELLA STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 7457, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 730. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A· RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84°17'15" EAST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7457; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°40'42" A DISTANCE OF 46.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF-BEGINNING, A RADIAL TO SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 8 0 ° 3 6' 3 3" EAST; THENCE ALONG · THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CENTELLA STREET, THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OP WAY LINE OF LEVANTE STREET, THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LA COSTA AVENUE AND THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 7 4 5 7, THE FOLLOWING COURSES : THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°36'33" A DISTANCE OF 211.62 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°36'09"; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 30.93 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 2030. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 ° 36' 09" A DISTANCE OF 127. 64 FEE.T; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 59°00'00" EAST, 366.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°40'29" A DISTANCE OF 30.26 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 842. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°50'26" A DISTANCE OF 247.48 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 20. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", A DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 38°50'03" WEST, 311.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1551. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF T:11/15/95 16:J0:Sl V: f I • • LB 00 PAGE 6 ~-~~-·~---._/._:1,_~ I ~ ORDER NO. 1126305-11 \__ ~~;0'04" A DISTANCE OF 67.71 FEET TO A POINT, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 5 3 ° 4 0' 0 l" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE NORTH 84 ° 1 7' SO 11 WEST, 332.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 223-170-33. ( ) PAGE 7 - r·- 672 ORDER NO. 1114479-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ULilO~l\l[D Ol. THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 518 THROUGH 521, INCLUSIVE AND 523 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7076, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO, OCTOBER 6, 1971. T:10/26/95 08:50:18 V: / / MF 00 PAGE 7 E:XltlBlt RGmnclnr-PaRcas 673 ORDER NO. 1114480-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ Ceot-d,Av6 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 9 AND 10 OF LA COSTA GREENS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 6708, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 18, 1970. PAGE 8 "EXHIBIT C" Schedule of Parkland Credits 674 Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credits are 13.841 acres as of the effective date of 1996 Parks Agreement. 17 EXHIBIT "D" VILLAGES OF LA COSTA EXISTING PARKLAND CREDITS ASSIGNMENT NOTICE 675 TillS NOTICE IS PROVIDED TO CITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7.1 of the 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT To: Community Development Director City of Carlsbad Date: 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Property Transferred: __ __.[-=de=scn=.:,i·p.,...ti=o=n) _______________ _ New Owner: _________________________ _ Real Estate Collateral Management Company hereby notifies the City that the above-described property has been transferred to the new owner indicated above. As part of that transfer, the following 1996 Parks Agreement credits and/or reimbursements have been assigned, or not, assigned as indicated: Credits: _ __.[De=scn=ibe==-cr=ed=its=,....,o .... r __ if .... n..,.o __ ne-, .... insert.....,......__."N .... o .... ne--....."] ..... ___________ _ Reimbursements: --=[P=-e=scn=·be~re=im=bu=rsem==en=t=s...__o=r __ if .... n=o=ne.--=insert=""'--'"N""'"o=ne=="_.,.].._,_ ____ _ The City is entitled to rely on this Notice. REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY/VILLAGES OF LA COSTA By: ____________ _ Name: ------------Title: ___________ _ C:\DMS\II.Wlt\11%7257.01 t~IST. OVERHEAD TEL. LINE (NO RECORD) -~,i,).Cf\0 ~ "~-\.01. r EXIST. 1 O' S.M.C.W.0. SEWER ESMT. (NO RECORD) (,) ..5 .!1 C .s ~ en C 0 u ~ 0 0 C,0 en en .- EXIST. 20' S.M.C.W.O. SEWER ESMT. VICINITY MAP NO SCALE CDNSULTA TS 1220--cw~ -:aao ........ -.c:aia--,._,, 111-•.:n-TIIXI ......... ,_1,1-u1-- NOT A PART PARC!El A P .M. NO. 13..627 102' ROAD ESMT. TO CITY OF CARLSBAD QfESS/Q PAR. 1 P.M. 11H 676 EXIST. 10' S.M.C.W.D. SEWER ESMT. (NO RECORD) EXIST. 20' S.M.C.W.0. SEWER ESMT. O' 500' ----SCALE: 1• = 500' ~ ..... /31 V\'- EASEMENT DEDICATION z rr, !ti A.P .N. 213-030-11 A.P.N. 215-021-07 A.P.N. 215-030-06, 14 A.P.N. 215-031-08 A.P.N. 215-052-15 A.P.N. 215-061-01, 09 A.P .N. 215-480-02, 03 SHT. 1 OF 2 SHTS. A.P.N. SEE ABOVE DATE 8-2-93 F"•\JOBS\911027\9127P4 12-2-96 3•18•33 pM EST Xrefs: NONE .:i C .s "3 (I) -C 0 (.) ~ C 0 co 0, 0, -@) NO. (11 (2) J) 14) I 5 l (6) I 7 l 18) 19) 10) 11) 112) 1 131 1141 115) 116) 117) 1181 I 19) 1 2C~ 21) i:) !: ~ '4) 5) l!t ~ 12-;) (2~) ll. OR BEARING 6. = 5"57'03" N 62'14'44• E N 31"07'51• W N 44"39'59" W N 59'48"34• W N 51"46'48" W N 12'22'49• W N 19'31 '46" E N 11"38'2.r E N 14"39'47' E N 28"30'4i W N 18"49'02• E N 6"55'23" W N 6"24'16'" W N 49' 48'26" W N 65"38'53" W N 79"24'38" W N 62'24'15• W N 9'18'25. W N 54"12'09" E N 3"48'04. E N 29'37'39• W · N 24"07'1i E N 5•4a•o.r w N 30-23'1.r W N 2'52'09" E N 68"20' 1 ()" W N 88"58'0i W RADIUS LENGTH NO. ll. OR BEARING 1451.00' 150.70' (29) N 4108'22" E 919.62' 0~) N 8"47'5i E 190.26' 31) N 2150'03" W 84.56' '"54) N 14"07'19• W 85.64' 53) N 8"56'01• E 78.53' 54) N 70"58'0T E 60.91' O!~ N 62'14'24• W 73.47' Ot~ N 45"50'59" W 142.47' Oi) N 68"26'08" W 100.29' 5l 1 N 83"47'0i W 47.47' I 59• N 66'31 '50" E 31.87' 4(1 N 35"28' 40" E 57.37' 141) N 58"26'39" E 97.04' 14: 1 N 62' 40'54• W 51.90' 14. J N 4"58'33" E 152.11' 144, N 3"59•54• W 45.79' 14!~ N 18"00'21• W 39.25' 14U N 3,.36'5T W 101.09' 14,' N 58"44'4i W 125.32' 14l ~ N 76'21'3T E 50.23' 41 D N 79"26'3i W 88.32' , O) N 45"14'24• W 49.46' 51 N 00"02'2i E 55.90' 5: J N 2714'45' W 40.54' ), ~ N 00-42'03" E 138.01' 1>4 N 66'21"36'" E 72.94' I>!~ 6 = 14•42•11· 43.99' l>D N 81"03'4i E ~~"efESSta t;>,) 6 = 12'52'00" EASEMENT DEDICATION , ... QUESTED BY: THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY 5465 MOREHOUSE OR.,STE.250 ---J~~~__;_;..p,.fZf',1 SAN OlEGO, CA 92121 PHONE: 619 546-8081 F':\JCBS\911027\9127P4 12-2-96 11,34,43 O.M EST Xrefs: NONE 677 RADIUS LENGTH 60.53' 52.03' 128.16' 88.77' 96.23' 63.32' 52.93' 60.55' 70.98' 95.52' 56.81' 76.86' 49.03' 402.09' 451.51' 238.54' 142.78' 231.48' 268.63' 31.04' 28.56' 52.89' 45.80' 90.81' 636.19' 1657.65' 1349.00' 346.17' 177.97' 1451.00' 325.84' A.P.N. 213-030-11 A.P.N. 215-021-07 A.P.N. 215-030-06, 14 A.P.N. 215-031-08 A.P.N. 215-052-15 A.P.N. 215-061-01, 09 A.P.N. 215-480-02, 03 SHT. 2 OF 2 SHTS. A.P.N. SEE ABOVE DATE 8-2-93 . . t3KJtle:l J F AvGA N'0~1e M~~~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 678 91-1027-3 8-5-93 PARK A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NUMBER 1188, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 20, 1972 AS FILE NUMBER 340334 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SOUTH 0° 42' 03" WEST, 636.19 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 66° 21' 36" WEST, 1657.65 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1349.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG SAlD CURVE THRqUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 ° 42' 11" A DISTANCE OF 346.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 ° 03' 47" WEST, 177.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1451.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 52' 00" A DISTANCE OF 325.84 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, FROM SAlD TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTINUING SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID 1451.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5° 57' 03" A DISTANCE OF 150.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 14' 44" WEST, 919.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 ° 07' 51" WEST, 190.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44° 39' 59" WEST, 84.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59° 48' 34" WEST, 85.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 ° 46' 48" WEST, 78.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12° 22' 49" WEST, 60.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19° 31' 46" EAST, 73.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 ° 38' 23" EAST, 142.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 39' 47" EAST, 100.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28° 30' 47" WEST, 47.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18° 49' 02" EAST, 31.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06° 55' 23" WEST, 57.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06° 24' 16" WEST, 97.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49° 48' 26" WEST, 51.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 65° 38' 53" WEST, 152.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79° 24' 38" WEST, 45.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62° 24' 15" WEST, 39.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09° 18' 25" WEST, 101.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54° 12' 09" EAST, 125.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03° 48' 04" EAST, 50.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29° 37' 39" WEST, 88.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24° 07' 17" EAST, 49.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05° 48' 03" WEST, 55.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 23• 13" WEST, 40.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02° 52' 09" EAST, 138.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68° 20' 10" EAST, 72.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 58' 07" EAST, 43.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42° 08' 22" EAST, 60.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08° 47' 57" EAST, 52.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22° 50' 03" WEST, 128.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 07' 19" WEST, 88.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08° 56' 01" EAST, 96.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 58' 07" EAST, 63.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 14' 24" EAST, 52.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45° 50' 59" EAST, 60.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68° 26' 08" EAST, 70.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83° 47' 07" EAST, 95.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 50" EAST, 56.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35° 28' 40" EAST, 76.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58° 26' 39" EAST, 49.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 40' 54" EAST, 402.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04° 58' 33" WEST, 451.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03° 59' 54" EAST, 238.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18° 00" 21" EAST, 142.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 ° 36' 57" EAST, 231.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 44' 47" EAST, 268.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76° 21' 37" EAST, 31.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79° 26' 37" EAST, 28.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45° 14' 24" EAST, 52.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00() 02' 27" WEST, 45.80 FEET; 679 THENCE SOUTH 27° 14' 45" EAST, 90.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT"G" RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: r , Name: City Oerk City of Carlsbad Street Address: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive City &. State: Carlsbad, CA 92008 l J MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: EXEMPT SPACE ABOVE nns LINE FOR RECORDERS USE Documcmmy transfer tax is S-=2::,_ [X] Computal on full value of property conveyal. or [ ] Computed 011 full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale or transfi:r. [] Unincorporated area or [X] City of Carlsbad; and IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE REAL PROPERTY FOR ALGA NORTE PARK PlojectNoJNAMB: _______ _ APN 680 REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT CO:MPANY, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter designated Grantor, represents that they are the owners of the hereinafter described real property, and for a valuable consideration, hereby makes an IRREVOCABLE OFFER. OF DEDICATION to the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipal corporation, hereinafter des~gnated ~ its successon and assigns, for the future Alga Norte Public Park upon, through, under, over and across the hereinafter described real property for the following purpose: ALGA NORTE PUBUC PARK the real property referred to above is situated in the City of Carlsbad, County or San Diego, State of California and is described in Exhibit "A" consisting of ___ pase(s), attached hereto and made a part hereof. Exhibit "B" consisting or ___ page(s) is attached for clarity only. 681 This Offer of Dedication is made pursuant to Section 70S0 of the Government Code of the State of California and may only be accepted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad fer thal poniea far wbieh a .n,m ce,.at.actiea 1:11IHl'Mt has heen a't\'lll'Clee. Acceptance QJ&)' be C<>ACUl'Hftt er sub1ccpJent $8 die 8Wlfd ef tile eeRBt.."\'ldiOA celltr.act for eac:b peHiea ef the road. This Offer ofDedication shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the Grantor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Irrevocable O~er of Dedication to be· executed this_ day of _______ 199 _. Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware corporation, as Owner By. _______________ _ Name: ·------------(Type or Print) Tide: ____________ _ (Type or Print) By. _______________ _ (Signature) Name: ___________ _ (Type or Print) Tide: ____________ _ (Type or Print) 2 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-5 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS June, 2000 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS April 12, 2001 Prepared by: ENGINEERS 1565 Hotel Circle South, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 299-3090 June 12, 2000 Revised October 19, 2000 Revised November 20, 2000 Revised December 28, 2000 Revised April 12, 2001 JPK/JR 3-970723 LINSC() r I L/\vV & CRI I-NSP1\N ENGINEERS XI. CIRCULATION A. PERFORMANCESTANDARD No road segment or intersection in the Zone or any road segment or intersection out of the Zone, which is impacted by development in the Zone,-·shall be projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak · hours or Service Level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. · B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of the analysis is to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 11 conforms to the adopted performance standards. It will also address all Circulation Element road segments and intersections outside of Zone 11 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 11 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This section is based on the Circulation Analysis for Local Facilities Management Zone 11 prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG}. The report analyzes existing, 2005, 2010 and city buildout conditions (2020}. Assumptions were made in the traffic report as to the location of residential development in each phase. These assumptions were provided to the traffic engineer by the City of Carlsbad and the property owners of Zone 11. Based on these yearly projections, the phasing of Circulation Element roadways located within Zone 11 are identified. The location of proposed development within each phase is for planning purposes only. The actual location and phasing of development may affect the timing for provision of Circulation Element roadways within Zone 11. The financial guarantee for the proposed circulation element roadways will be provided; however, the construction of the facility may not occur until the development requiring the need for the roadways are constructed. · In the event it is determined that circulation facilities need to be accelerated or delayed as a result of changes in the location and/or timing of land use development, the timing of the required roadway improvements may be modified without amendment to this plan. However, any .deletions or additions to the list of improvements anticipated herein will require amending this plan. -1- LL'\JSCOl T LA\\' & Cl\[ENSP1\N ENGINEERS 1. INVENTORY a. Circulation Element Roads Within Zone 11 b. There are seven circulation roadways located within or adjacent to Zone 11. Rancho Santa Fe Road, Melrose Drive, La Costa Avenue and Camino De Los Coches are located within the boundaries of Zone 11, while Alga Road, Alicante Road and Calle Barcelona are outside but adjacent to the Zone. · Rancho Santa Fe Road and Melrose Drive are designated as six-lane prime arterials, while Alga Road and Melrose Drive are designated as four-lane major arterials by the City of Carlsbad. La Costa Avenue, Camino de Los Caches, El Fuerte and Calle Barcelona are designated as secondary arterial roadways. Identification of Impacted Road Segments and Intersections As stated in the performance standard, impacted road segments and intersections are those that have 20% or more of the Zone 11 traffic using them. It is possible that certain road segments or intersections will not be analyzed for each study year since the construction of additional road segments may decrease the distribution on a road segment below the 20% distribution threshold from a previous study year. The Zone 11 distribution is determined by a Select Zone Assignments (SZA) from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea Model. Figures 1, 2 and 3 {following the text and tables) show the estimated distribution percentages of Zone 11 traffic on the roadway system for Years 2005, 2010 and buildout conditions. The road segments and intersections that are impacted by 20% of Zone 11 traffic are listed below. These facilities were evaluated to determine the geometry necessary to meet the Level of Service performance standards. The intersection numbers are the same as in the Villages of La Costa EIR, which is cause for the nonsequential order. -2- LINSCOTT I A\!\/ & CI\EENSP\N ENGINEERS --------------- Road Segments Olivenhain Road: Classification El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road Four-Lane Major Rancho Santa Fe Road: Melrose Drive to Olivenhain Road Six-lane Prime Intersections 11. El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road 18. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road 22. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows 23. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road 24. Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Avenue 25. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue 26. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Camino de los Coches 27. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona 28. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road -3- LINSCOTT L,\\ \' & CREENSP,\~ ENGINEERS 2. PHASING The traffic analysis prepared by LLG is a detailed study dealing with the specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 11. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 11 . The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard through buildout. The traffic analysis uses the proposed roadway system and intersection geometrics for existing conditions and Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 conditions as outlined by the City of Carlsbad. The time increments are used more as benchmarks than actual completion dates. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements needs to be accelerated, or that the timing is premature, the required improvements must also be adjusted to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Existing conditions were determined by performing peak hour counts at study intersections. Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 were evaluated using data developed from the SANDAG/Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea computer traffic forecast model. The street segment classifications show the peak hour volume per lane of the street segment, the existing peak hour volume to capacity (V/C) ratio, and the street segment Level of Service (LOS) without mitigation and with mitigation. The peak hour capacity per lane is assumed as 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) for the City Surface streets. -4- LINSCOTT LA'v\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 11 and propose a mitigation plan if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance standard. The phasing of development and analysis of traffic impacts will be monitored on an annual basis. However, for the purpose of this study, the timing of the necessary improvements will be presented in the following increments: • Improvements needed now • Improvements needed prior to 2005 • Improvements needed prior to 2010 • Improvements needed prior to Buildout (2020) The phasing schedule noted above should not limit needed traffic improvements to the years mentioned. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements has changed, the required improvements shall also be adjusted either earlier or later to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone 11. The intersections were analyzed using an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The calculation sheets are contained in Appendix A. The street segments were analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Methodology to determine the operational Level of Service. The performance standard determines that during peak hour a Level of Service A through D as acceptable and a Level of Service of E or worse to be unacceptable. If a facility does not meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an acceptable Level of Service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more thoroughly later in this report. Traffic conditions for existing, 2005, 201 0 and 2020 are described below. The Level of Service for impacted roadways and intersections are indicated and, if needed, recommended circulation improvement needs are identified. Existing and future intersection geometric conditions and recommended improvements are shown in Figure 15. -5 - LINSCOTl LAV\/ & (~I'( [ L NS I )1\ N ENGINEERS 1. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. Existing Conditions. Traffic Volumes and Capacity The existing circulation element is shown in Figure 4. Existing daily traffic volumes are shown in Table 1. One intersection within the 20% criteria area was calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as listed below and shown in Table 2. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive (LOS F, AM peak hour) No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 3. 2. ANALYSIS OF 2005 CIRCULATION CONDITIONS a. 2005 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2005 is shown in Figure 6. The trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Table 4. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 60,61 O ADT (30,305 in and 30,305 out), with 3,200 inbound and 2,435 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,170 inbound and 3,090 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 5; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Figure 15. These mitigations represent upgrades required with the planned widening of roadways or to identify new intersections. Peak hour volumes for 2005 are shown in Figure 7. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown ·in Table 6. The ADT volumes for 2005 are shown in Figure 8. -6- LINSCOTT LA\:V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 3. ANALYSIS OF 2010 CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. 2010 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2010 is shown in Figure 9. Trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Table 7. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 67,890 ADT (33,945 in and 33,945 out), with 3,395 inbound and 2,835 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,675 inbound and 3,325 outbound trips during the PM Peak Hour. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 8; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Figure 15. These mitigations represent upgrades required with the planned widening of roadways or to identify new intersections. The 201 O peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 10. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 9. The ADT volumes for 2010 are shown in Figure 11. 4. ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT (2020) CONDITIONS a. Buildout Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2020 is shown in Figure 12. Trip generation for Zone 11 is shown in Table 10. Zone 11 is calculated to generate about 67,890 ADT (33,945 in and 33,945 out), with 3,395 inbound and 2,835 outbound trips during the AM Peak Hour and 3,675 inbound and 3,325 outbound trips during the.PM Peak Hour. Two intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 11, which are listed below. With the recommended mitigation shown in Figure 15, these intersections are -7- LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS calculated to operate with acceptable Levels of Service. The 2020 peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 13. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road (LOS E, AM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road (LOS E, AM peak hour, LOS F PM peak hour) No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 12. The ADT volumes for 2020 are shown in Figure 14. D. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Prior to the recordation of the first final map or issuance of a grading or building permit, which ever occurs first within Zone 11 , a financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved by the City. With the following improvements, all analyzed intersections and street segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service. a. b. Improvements needed now The intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive was calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS. It will be mitigated by the planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction project. The City has programmed about $6 million for this improvement, with other funding from the Villages of La Costa project. Improvements needed by 2005 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment -realignment and construction to four lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive. Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection - realignment and construction of new intersection with northbound dual left-tum lanes, three thru lanes with the -8- LINSCOTT LA\N & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS C. number three lane .being a combination thru-right tum lane, southbound dual left-tum lanes, two thru lanes and a right-tum lane, eastbound left-tum lane, two thru lanes and a right-tum lane, and westbound dual left-tum lanes, two thru lanes, and a right-tum lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Drive intersection -lane additions due to widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road. One additional southbound travel lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road intersection - realignment and new construction with a northbound thru lane and a combination thru-right tum lane, southbound left-tum lane and two thru lanes, and eastbound dual left-tum lanes and a right-tum lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Drive intersection -new intersection with northbound left-tum lane, and two thru. lanes with the number two lane being a combination thru-right tum lane, southbound left-tum lane, and two thru lanes with the number two lane being a combination thru-right tum lane, eastbound left-tum lane and combination thru-right turn lane, and westbound left-tum lane and combination thru-right turn lane. Improvements needed by 2010 Rancho Santa Fe Road segment -widen from four to six lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Avenue. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Drive intersection -remove signal and restrict movements to right-in and right-out only to and from the east leg. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road Intersection - construct west leg with a left-turn lane and a combination thru-right turn lane, add a northbound left-tum lane and additional thru lane, an additional southbound thru lane, · restripe the number 3 lane to a combination thru-right tum lane, and restripe the westbound right-turn lane to a combination thru-right tum lane. -9- LINSCOfT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS d. e. Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Drive intersection -add an additional thru lane on the north and south legs as part of the Rancho Santa Fe Road widening. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue intersection - add an additional thru lane on the north and south legs as part of the Rancho Santa Fe Road widening. Improvements needed by build out (2020) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection - construct an additional southbound thru lane and an additional eastbound right-turn lane. This mitigation was calculated using the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road intersection - construct an additional southbound left-tum lane creating dual-left turn lanes, and add a right-turn lane. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road/Camino Alvaro intersection -construct a southbound left-tum lane creating dual-left turn lanes, and add a thru lane on the north and south legs. Summary Mitigation to the significantly impacted intersections and street segments are summarized in Table 13 and shown graphically in Figure 15. With the previously mentioned improvements, all intersections and road segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service to meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. N:\723\Zone 11 2000\Zone 11 LFMP -Circulation.doc N:\723\Zone 11 2000\cover.doc -1 0- LINSCC)TT Lr\\ V & CR[[ NSI-\\N ENGINEERS TABLE 1 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT'S) ZONE 11 STREET SEGMENT DATE 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o Cadencia Street 1999 25,130 n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 1999 26,170 Source: 1999 Traffic Monitoring Program, Valley Research and Planning Associates Zone11 2ooorrab1 .723 09/18/00 -11 - I IN"'(< HT I \\ \' ,\:. ( J~f f N5P:\N ENGINEERS TABLE2 EXISTING.SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE 11 INTERSECTION EXISTING 11) Rancho Santa Fe Roac:1/Olivenhain Road 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 23) Ouesthaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road .. 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road 25) La Costa Avenue ($)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 26) Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road .. ICU = Intersection Capacity Ut1hzat1on LOS = Level of Service *Mitigated to acceptable LOS by Planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction project Zone11 2000/Tab2.723 09/18/00 -12- AM ICU 0.53 1.02 0.57 0.65 ONE 0.61 0.55 0.14 0.78 ICU O.OOto 0.61 to 0.71 to 0.81 to 0.90 to > LOS A p A B - B A A C PM ICU 0.56 0.78 0.64 0.48 ONE 0.65 0.67 0.48 0.63 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.00 LOS A C B A - B B A B A B C D E F SEGMENT LOCATION Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive n/o Questhaven Road n/o Cadencia Street n/o La Costa Avenue nlo Camino de Los Caches n/o Calle Barcelona n/o Olivenhaln Road TABLE3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE 11 LANES LINK DIRECTION VIC LOS EACH VOLUME DIRECTION 2/1 1,540 NB 0.43 A 2/1 1,320 NB 0.37 A 1 1,420 NB 0.79 C 1 1,490 NB 0.82 D 3 1,410 NB 0.26 A 3 1,560 NB 0.29 A 2 1,360 NB 0.38 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane m the peak hour, by d1rect1on. nlo = north of NB = Northbound, etc. Zone11 2000ffab3.723 06/12/00 LINK DIRECTION VOLUME 1,192 SB 1,320 SB 1,220 SB 1,160 SB 960 SB 1,010 SB 1,020 SB V/C RANGE LOS 0.00 ~ 0.60 A 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F V/C 0.66 0.73 0.68 0.64 0.18 0.19 0.28 m z Cl z m m "' Ill LOS B C B B A A A I ---1 LAND USE SIZE TABLE4 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION VEAR2005 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADT) PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 2,416 DU 10/DU 24,160 8% 3:7 580 Multi-Family Residential 554 DU 8/DU 4,430 8% 2:8 70 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 Office 7.3AC 300/AC 2,190 14% 9:1 275 Community Facilities 6.9AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3 AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Park 3.2AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 High School 86.3 AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 TOTAL TRIPS --60,610 --3,200 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Zone11 2000/Tab10.723 04/12/01 OUT 1,355 285 190 30 115 Neg 5 145 310 2,435 PM PEAK HOUR %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT 10% 7:3 1,690 725 10% 7:3 310 135 9% 5:5 710 710 13% 2:8 55 230 13% 2:8 215 860 2% 5:5 Neg Neg 4% 5:5 5 5 7% 3:7 30 65 12% 3:7 155 360 --3,170 3,090 u, I TABLES 2005 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE 11 INTERSECTION EXISTING 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road with roadway widening mitigation 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 26) Camino de Los Caches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service AM ICU LOS 0.53 A 1.02 F* 0.57 A 0.65 B ONE - 0.61 B 0.55 A 0.14 A 0.78 C • Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction Zone11 2000/Tab5.723 09/18/00 ICU 0.56 0.78 0.64 0.48 ONE 0.65 0.67 0.48 0.63 0.00 0.61 0.71 0.81 0.90 PM LOS A C B A - B 8 A 8 !QU to 0.60 to 0.70 to 0.80 to 0.90 to 1.00 > 1.00 AM ICU 0.47 0.54 0.52 0.85 0.64 0.51 0.61 0.49 0.12 0.63 A B C D E F YEAR2005 LOS ICU A 0.62 A 0.57 A 0.58 D 0.63 B 0.63 A 0.50 B 0.58 A 0.54 A 0.45 8 0.79 PM "' z 0 z "' "' :,a t/1 LOS 8 A A 8 8 A A A A C en I SEGMENT LOCATION Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La CQsta Meadows Drive n/o Questhaven Road n/o Cadencia Street n/o La Costa Avenue n/o Camino de Los Caches n/o Calle Barcelona n/o Olivenhain Road LANES EACH TABLE6 2005 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE 11 UNK DIRECTION V/C LOS VOLUME DIRECTION 2 1,460 NB 0.41 A 2 1,370 NB 0.24 A 2 1,160 NB 0.32 A 2 1,070 NB 0.30 A 3 1,180 NB 0.22 A 3 1,270 NB 0.24 A 3 1,950 NB 0.36 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. n/o = north of NB = Northbound, etc. Zone11 2000/TabB.723 06/12/00 LINK DIRECTION VOLUME 1,860 SB 1,750 SB 1,230 SB 1,020 SB 920 SB 1,020 SB 1,620 SB V/C RANGE LOS 0.00 ~ 0.60 A 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F V/C 0.52 0.49 0.34 0.28 0.17 0.19 0.30 m z C'I z m m "' "' LOS A A A A A A A I ...... --a I LAND USE SIZE TABLE7 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION VEAR2010 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADTI PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 3,026 DU 10/DU 30,260 8% 3:7 725 Multi-Family Residential 668DU 8/DU 5,340 8% 2:8 85 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 Office 8.2AC 300/AC 2,460 14% 9:1 310 Community Facilities 6.9AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Park 3.2AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 High School 86.3 AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 TOTAL TRIPS . . 67.890 . -3.395 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 1 O and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Zone11 2000/Tab10.723 04/12/01 OUT 1,695 340 190 35 115 Neg 5 145 310 2.835 PM PEAK HOUR %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT 10% 7:3 2,120 910 10% 7:3 375 160 9% 5:5 710 710 13% 2:8 65 255 13% 2:8 215 860 2% 5:5 Neg Neg 4% 5:5 5 5 7% 3:7 30 65 12% 3:7 155 360 --3.675 3,325 TABLES 2010 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE11 INTERSECTION EXISTING YEAR 2005 AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain Road 0.53 A 0.56 A 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road 1.02 F* 0.78 C 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.57 A 0.64 B with roadway widening mitigation ' e--'- ~3) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.65 B 0.48 A with mitigation of roadway widening & new west leg 24} S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road DNE -DNE - with roadway widening mitigation 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.61 B 0.65 B with roadway widening mitigation 26} Camino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.55 A 0.67 B 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.14 A 0.48 A 28) Olivehain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 0.78 C 0.63 B .. ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service 0.00 ONE = Does not Exist 0.61 *Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction 0.71 Zone11 2000frab8.723 09/18/00 0.81 0.90 AM ICU LOS 0.47 A 0.54 A 0.52 A 0.64 B 0.51 A 0.61 B 0.49 A 0.12 A 0.63 B ICU to 0.60 to 0.70 to 0.80 to 0.90 to 1.00 > 1.00 ICU 0.62 0.57 0.58 0.63 0.50 0.58 0.54 0.45 0.79 A B C D E F PM AM LOS ICU B 0.52 A 0.67 A 0.43 0.34 B 0.71 0.61 A 0.73 0.59 A 0.75 0.64 A 0.58 A 0.13 C 0.63 "' z Cl z "' "' "' Ill YEAR 2010 LOS ICU A 0.68 B 0.60 A 0.45 A 0.33 C 0.70 B 0.70 C 0.71 A 0.55 C 0.66 B 0.55 A 0.71 A 0.47 B 0.90 PM LOS B A A A B 8 C A B A C A D co I TABLE9 2010 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE 11 SEGMENT LOCATION LANES LINK DIRECTION EACH VOLUME DIRECTION Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive 3 1,380 NB n/o Questhaven Road 3 1,440 NB n/o Cadencia Street 3 2,040 NB n/o La Costa Avenue 3 1,650 NB n/o Camino de Los Coches 3 1,380 NB n/o Calle Barcelona 3 1,490 NB n/o Olivenhain Road 3 2,140 NB Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak hour, by direction. n/o = north of . NB = Northbound, etc. Zone11 2000/Tab9.723 06/12/00 VIC LOS 0.26 A 0.27 A 0.38 A 0.31 A 0.26 A 0.28 A 0.40 A LINK DIRECTION VOLUME 1,460 SB 1,520 SB 2,050 SB 1,610 SB 1,280 SB 1,380 SB 1,590 SB VIC RANGE LOS 0.00 ~ 0.60 A 0.61 to 0. 70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F VIC 0.27 0.28 0.38 0.30 0.24 0.26 0.29 m z C) z m m ;,, V> LOS A A A A A A A I "3 c::> I LAND USE SIZE TABLE10 ZONE 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR2020 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADTI PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 3,026 DU 10/DU 30,260 8% 3:7 725 Multi-Family Residential 668 DU 8/DU 5,340 8% 2:8 85 Commercial 39.3 AC 400/AC 15,720 3% 6:4 280 Office 8.2AC 300/AC 2,460 14% 9:1 310 Community Facilities 6.9AC 1,200/AC 8,280 14% 9:1 1,045 Utilities (Open Space) 22.3AC 2/AC 40 2% 5:5 Neg Park 3.2AC 50/AC 160 4% 5:5 5 Elementary School 21.8 AC 60/AC 1,310 28% 6:4 220 High Schoof 86.3AC 50/AC 4,320 24% 7:3 725 TOTAL TRIPS -. 67.890 --3,395 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. 5. Neg denotes negligible traffic volumes. 6. Community Facilities includes a fire station. Zone11 2000/Tabt0.723 04/12/01 OUT 1,695 340 190 35 115 Neg 5 145 310 2.835 %OF ADT 10% 10% 9% 13% 13% 2% 4% 7% 12% - PM rn z Cl z rn ;,a .,, PEAK HOUR IN:OUT VOLUME SPLIT IN OUT 7:3 2,120 910 7:3 375 160 5:5 710 710 2:8 65 255 2:8 215 860 5:5 Neg Neg 5:5 5 5 3:7 30 65 3:7 155 360 -3,675 3,325 TABLE11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE11 INTERSECTION 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhaln Road 18) Melrose Drive/Rancho Santa Fe Road With mitigation of widening and addition of SB lane 22) La Costa Meadows Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Rd 23) Questhaven Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road With mitigation of SB left-tum and right-tum lanes 24) S. Melrose Avenue/Rancho Santa Fe Road 25) La Costa Avenue (S)/Rancho Santa Fe Rd 26) Gamino de Los Coches/Rancho Santa Fe Rd 27) Calle Barcelona/Rancho Santa Fe Road 28) Ollvenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road With mltiaation of SB left-turn and thru lanes DELAY Is measured in seconds. LOS • Level of Service ONE = Does not Exist AM ICU 0.53 1.02 0.57 0.65 ONE 0.61 0.55 0.14 0.78 EXISTING PM LOS ICU LOS A 0.56 A p 0.78 C A 0.64 8 B 0.48 A -ONE - B 0.65 B B 0.67 B A 0.48 A B 0.63 B *Mitigated to acceptable LOS with planned Rancho Santa Fe Road realignment and reconstruction Zone11 2000/T ab11.723 09/18/00 YEAR2005 AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS 0.47 A 0.62 B 0.54 A 0.57 A 0.52 A 0.58 A 0.64 B 0.63 B 0.51 8 0.50 A 0.61 A 0.58 A 0.49 A 0.54 A 0.12 A 0.45 A 0.63 C 0.79 C JW 0.00 > 0.60 0.61 to 0.70 0.71 to 0.80 0.81 to 0.90 0.91 to 1.00 > 1.00 AM ICU 0.52 0.67 0.34 0.61 0.59 0.64 0.58 0.13 0.63 l.Qa A B C D E F YEAR2010 PM LOS ICU LOS A 0.68 B B 0.60 A A 0.33 A B 0.70 B A 0.55 A B 0.55 A A 0.71 C A 0.47 A D 0.90 D AM ICU 0.68 0.86 0.80 0.45 0.92 0.77 0.64 0.72 0.67 0.14 0.94 0.71 "' :z Cl :z "' "' ~ Ill YEAR2020 LOS ICU B 0.76 D 0.72 C 0.62 A 0.45 E 0.74 C 0.74 8 0.81 C 0.67 B 0.76 A 0.51 E 1.15 C 0.77 PM LOS C C B A C C D B C A F C I "" "" I SEGMENT LOCATION Rancho Santa Fe Road n/o La Costa Meadows Drive n/o Questhaven Road n/o Cadencia Street n/o La Costa Avenue n/o Camino de Los Caches n/o Calle Barcelona n/o Olivenhain Road LANES EACH TABLE12 2020 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE11 LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS VOLUME DIRECTION 3 1,980 NB 0.37 A 3 2,080 NB 0.39 A 3 2,750 NB 0.51 A 3 2,390 NB 0.44 A 3 1,950 NB 0.36 A 3 1,930 NB 0.36 A 3 2,350 NB 0.44 A Capacity= 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane m the peak hour, by direction. nlo = north of . NB = Northbound, etc. Zone11 2000/Tab12.723 06/12/00 LINK DIRECTION VOLUME 2,120 SB 2,290 SB 2,500 SB 2,200 SB 1,770 SB 1,800 SB 2,150 SB VIC RANGE LOS 0.00 ~ 0.60 A 0.61 to 0.70 B 0. 71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F VIC 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.40 "' z C) z "' "' "' V, LOS A A A A A A A , LINS( () I l I -\\ \ 0-: C ;f\! I NS/>1\N ENGINEERS TABLE13 MITIGATION SUMMARY FOR CALCULATED IMPACTS ZONE 11 IMPACTED SEGMENT EXISTING 2005 2010 OR INTERSECTION WITH REFERENCE NUMBER INTERSECTIONS 18) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ No mitigation Realignment & add Melrose Drive recommended due an east leg with full to planned movements on each improvement by leg 2005 22) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Add an additional Remove signal, La Costa Meadows Dr southbound travel restrict westbound lane movements and add northbound and southbound thru lanes 3) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Realign & widen Construct west leg Questhaven Rd each leg with full movements on each lea 24) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Construct new Add an additional South Melrose Dr intersection northbound and southbound travel lane 25) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Add an additional La Costa Ave northbound and southbound travel lane 28) Rancho Santa Fe Rd/ Olivenhain Rd l SEGMENTS Rancho Santa Fe Road Realign & widen to 4 lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive Note: For detailed improvement descriptions, please refer to text. Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 11/9/00. Zone11 2ooorrab13.723 06/12/00 -23- Widen to 6 lanes from La Costa Avenue to Melrose Drive 2020 Add eastbound right-tum lane and southbound thru- lane Add southbound left-turn lane and right-turn lane Add southbound left-tum and southbound and northbound travel lane REV. 06/12/00 FIG20-2-723.0WG LINSCOTT LA\·V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ·············· ................ .................. ··················· , ................. . ········••·········· :::::: :: :::.·:.·::.·:.·. ··········-········· ···················· :.·::::::::::.·::::.·::: .· . .-.-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::zaNt::::: -:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::t,:::::::··· .. •.-:-:-1 .... .-.... _.: ... · ... ·.-:: :::: :::.·.·::::: :. ::::. 'I \JBiill§filJJ? Ii'-! ,. ··~ ·l ·l '.. .•. . ·J ............ ............ ············· .............. ::::::::::::::. t /:::::/:/\:::::! .. .-.. :.·:.·::.· .. .-....... t ::.·.·.·.·.·::.·.·.·.·:.·.1 ......... ·: •.................. 1 .· ... ·:.·:.·:.·.·.·:.·:.·.1 ............................. 1 ......... ··.;.;;.;.;.;i ........................ , .·.-... ·.·.·.· .............. . ::::::.· ... ·::: .. :, ~ :/:/:\:/:] ~ .•::•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:-:-:•:•:•: t::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ;TlI!I;,II] ::.·::: .. :::::.·::.1 .................................. 1 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 ............... : ......... ·. ·. ·:. ·:, TJ}ItflJ LEGEND NO DEL LOS COCHES ,.-.-. ::::.j -Indicates Zone 11 Area XXX -Indicates Rounded ADT Distribution Percentages @ -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 1 2005 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION -24-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 06/12/00 FIG20-2-723.0WG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ········ ... ,. ··············· ················· .................. . . ·::: :::::::,·. ·. ·::: :: ......... , ........... . .-.-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::zoNt: . ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::tt:::::· .-.-:-:•1 :.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::~ 'tSflf@@r i:{j ~ -~ ···········-:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::-.~ UIFI?UJ ·.·:.·:.·::::.·.·.·.·::.1 ··:::::::::::::::::::ta :•:::::/:::::::\J ~ :\t?f?/i ~ ::::: :;;:i .. :::::::::::::.1 . :::::::::::.·::::.1 ·::.·.·::::.·:.·:.·:.·::.1 /:::::::::::::::::\\:/1 'i:i:P\LJJ LEGEND NO DEL LOS COCHES ,_._. .. _._._._._, -lncltcates Zone 11 Ina XXX -Indicates Rounded NJT Distribution Percentages ® -Indicates Intersection Number ? NO SCALE Figure 2 2010 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION -25-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 06/12/00 FIG20-2-723.DWG LINS-COTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ............... ............... ················· .................. ................... .................... ···················· ... :-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ZONE:: .. ::::/:\:/::\:::\:/It/ .::::::::1 'tllirnt@f jit Ill:! •l ·l .. ... . ·) ············ ............. ·············· :::::::::::::: .. ............................... ItiltiI] ........................ · ... 1 ......... ··;.;;.;;.a DEL LOS C0CHES ..:::::::::::::::::::::] ,t,s:,,?,::::: · ll:I!Ii! .. 1 ··················. ············ ............................. : ......................... .. ......................... . . . ........................ ~ RD --:::::::::::::::::::·:. )ttIL@] \:/:}:/:}:/] \:}}l(:i:::}] ·;,;;J &;.·~·.;;.;J LEGEND 1.-.-.-.... .-.... .J -Indicates Zone 11 Ina XXX -Indicates Rounded AM Distribution Percentages @ -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 3 2020 ZONE 11 DISTRIBUTION -26-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 06/12/00 FIG20-2-723.DWG LINSCOTT . LAW&· .. GREENSPAN ENCilNEERS 6 4 oUVEN\"WN RD (/:\\\ ·.·:.·::::::::., ·.·:.·:::::.·:,·:.\. ................. ................... : .. : .. : . ·::::: .. : .. :::. ·:: .. ······················· ·:. ·::::::: :: ::::::.·:::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::: :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-························ ........................ ······················ .. , _:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . :: :: :::.·:::::::: :::.·. ·:.·::. ·. ttitii:It&.~f ::tr· .... ::::::::1 ··\:/://?/:::\/\:\/Y _.::::::::/] \Ll((.Hy·•·· BI@l ,_. ·:::::::::::.1 .·.·.·:.·:.·.·.·.·:.·.·.1 ·:.·:.·:.·:.·.·.·.·.·::.1 .·:.·:.·.·.·:.·.·.·.·::.·.1 I?tktf\! ·:.·.·.·:::.·.·:.·:.·:.·J ·:.· :: ::::.·:.· :::: J :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ \ItLEl] :-:::::::::::::::::::::] :. ·:::::. ·:. ·:::1 :i:tt::::::i{] :: :::. ·: : .. :: :: : : ::. . .. ·. ·:::: ... ·: :: : J ·····•1rnrn•w2 I I;l . :::::::::::::.·:::I ·:::.·.·.-.,.-..... ·:::. ·.·.·., ·.·:::.·.·::.·:.·.·.·:.·:.·., ·::::.·:.·.·:::.·.·:::.·:1 {[}I{ItJ LEGEND NO DEL LOS COCHES ,.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-j -Indicates Zone 11 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes ® -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 4 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT -27-LFMP ZONE 11 EL CAMINO R~ LEUCADIA BOU 'ARD/ OLIVENHAIN ROM) 6011) N-...... ~~ ~~~ '-.. 146/109 ,re -575/437 p 821/540 169/368 J 'it r 319/.527-81/136, ~~~ -om @ l~~ m111 ... ,,, RANCHO SANTA FE ROM)/ SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE DOES NOT EXIST @ RANCHO SANTA ~ RONJ/ OLJVENHAIN ROAD CAMINO /IJ..VAAO 111111 .... ';;i;-;::.S, '-.. 17/ 24 --N -722/581 _.., ! '.. p 395/254 6/ 12..J 'it I"' 44wsa-/ 11, r-mm ai-in -,., @ t~i REV. 10/18/00 LLG723U6.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS MELROSE DRIVE/. RANCHO SANTA FE RO/!D ll11D er--~t::... ror--:2A ..,)1 37~268J "t 25 ;1s1, IDa:I •in NC ';i,-~ @ inc,, _,... RANCHO SANTA FE RO/!D/ LA COSTA AVENUE ;i;g N ' ~;::;-'-.. 61/42 ... in -m _..,,\.. -145/50 r 19/ 5 316/.316 J 'it I"' 118/120- 217/180, -inc, l'>c Na, @ ~g~ ..,_ RANCHO SANTA FE RO~ LA COSTA MEADOWS OR RANCHO SANTA FE ROl!D/ QUESTHAVEN RO/!D .. ,._ro -ca _,... _., Ill a,-';;i;-~~ ............ '-.. 82/327 a,"" -ro C,,I') '-..161/59 IIIN m .JJ \.. -0/ 0 '\.. p24/152 ,100/43 1/0J 'it I"' tr s~- 3/1, 0~2 inro ..-c o-,,, s~ @ cinro @ CID """"" a,-a, RANCHO SANTA FE R~ CAMINO DE LOS COCH RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ CALLE BARCELONA Na:I gi,.,m ...... a,I'> ii ~t::..., .,~:;: '-.. 111/ 38 -'-..12B/ 75 ,., --'\.. .J l '.. -75/ 44 r266/132 r 224/141 tr 39/BOJ ""'itl"' 35/44-<ON 24/35, -.... in c-Na,ro -N @ s-~ @ ~,, ....... N2:e IDl'J ,..._ '-..AM/PM -AM"/!'M pAM"/PM E-W STREET ~ ffi Ill ~ I z NO SCALE Figure 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -28-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 08/12/00 FIG20-2-723.DWG UNSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4 ············· ················ ················· ··················· ······•············· ····················· ·.·:::::::::::::::.·:::. _.: .. :. ·: :: :: :: :: :: :: :. ·::. ::::::::::::::.-.·.·:::::. ······················· ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . .-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-:-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::toNt::::::::::::-- ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,1::::::::::::-· ... ::::::::. :::::.·::::::.·::::::::::.·:::::::: ::::.·:• \f@iMSf f 7 !:ill . ,. ··.1 .J ·l ... ... . ·J ············· ············· :::.·::::::.-: .-. :::::::::::::: .. f Ii:III:~:i~I .·.·::.·:.·::.·.·:.·:.·.1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ jj/J····~ ::::::::.1 . :::::::::., .::::::.·::::., ::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 ]ffifti ·:::::::.·::.·:~ :-:\/:\:::\t ::::::::::::: ... . .-:-:-::::::::::::::::::::::::J ill1%ifl LEGEND 1.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.J -Indicates Zone 11 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes © -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 6 2005 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -29-LFMP ZONE 11 EL CAMINO R~ LEUCADIA BOU 'ARD/ OLIVEN~ ROAD Ull')O ..-QI') ~£.~ ~giui '-.. 420/ 64 .) + \.. -683/305 , 639/265 52/388_,J ""\tr 154/857-NII')..-52/162', .,,..,.., _..,01 @ ~~ ........ IE~ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE Nr,.-.... ..,.111 0 ~lm '-.. 65/47 -.) + \.. -10/10 , 10/10 183/36 _) ""\ t ("' 21/ 6- 85/45', ~:e~ -o ~~()' @ ... iii ... RANCHO SANTA bl ROAD/ OUVENHAIN ROAD CAMINO ALVA ~O ,n..-in ....... .., ",nit) ,n~C)' '._ 339/170 010 01<'1 .) + \.. -'ii 6 ,s81/ 97 19/8_,J ""\ t t" 5/3-5/5', II) Cl> ac, co ... NII> @ ....... ~ ........ ,n -;::;01 REV. 10/18/00 LLG723U.OWG LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS MELROSE DRIVE/. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD ouo..-ll')N,.. ~~ ........ ll')CIClr,. '-.. 15/50 :!!~II) .) + \.. -45r/3 ,50-;75 452/405 _) ""t I" 98/ 34- 322/893 ', 0,11)0 i~ ,,, @) "l<'IO .., r,. II) cor-- RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE OJGO"l ..-1')0 -ui--;;;-~-;,;,. o,r,.11) '-.. 79/ 57 ... ,... .) + \.. -154/338 r ,11209 114/119 _) ""\tr 225/258- so/ 26', -mm ll>ON '~~ @ :!:I!,!!:; 11).- RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD~ LA COSTA MEADOWS DR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ QUESTHAVEN ROAD l')ltl ~~ <'IOI or--ui-£.;;,-$~ _.., r--C'I ui-'-..555/237 ui-'-.. 160/123 + \.. + \.. ,475/313 , 14/129 tr tr r--<'I NCI ....... ao m ~~ r,. @ ~~ @ r--<'I _,.. ..,._ 110<'1 - RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ CAMINO DE LOS COCHES RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ CALLE BARCMNA or:: ll')o,11) 1')211) ~~ ;;,-,, o..- '-._ 53/1067 -i~ '-.. 56/22 01 01 + \.. .) '\.. -84/32 ,111/ 169 , 113/54 tr 24/24_,J ""\tr 26/92-o-11/12 ', N-..-oO _.,,,.. ... -:: .... @ ............... @ ;:?~ ~ ....... 01..,0 CD co.., '-..AM/PM -AM/PM ,AM/PM E-W STRE£T 8 ~ II) .'1 I z NO SCALE Figure 7 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -30-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 04/12/01 FIG20-2-723.DWG LINSCOTT LAVV & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS i ·.·:•:•:\ _._. ...... ~ :·:·:·:·:·:•:\. .................. , ..................... \. ·············· ················ ................ ················ ··················· ···················· ···················· ..................... ................... ···················· ····················· ....................... ··············-······· ······················· ······················· ........................ ........................ ........................ ························ . ..::::::::::/::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::: .... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ZONt::::::::::::-- :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::it::::::::::::--... :.::::::. \Jfili!]jt[F ii] . ,.. ·:.1 .J ·:·) . ..... . ..... . ·J ············· ............. ·············· .............. ·:::::::::::::: .. .............. -... ·.·:.·.·.·.·, :·:•:•:·:·:-:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:• ................................ ................................ . _._._. .. _._ .................. . ·.-.-.. .-:.·:.-... · ......... 1 ............................. ) ·· .. ::··.;.;.;.;;., ........................ 1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ...... .-... ·.·•· ... ·.-.-.. , ·:·:·:·:·:•:•:·:•:•:•:•:•:1 ..... :.:·:·:•:·:•:•:•:-:•:•:· .,::::::::::::::::::::::J ··············" . ·····-·······J ::::\:\\/:/: .: :\:\:/:/:~ ff H\J:i? ·\ltf &HJ ........................... .-.-.-.1 {:/:/:/:\::::\1 Cf}Lffl] LEGEND 1.-.... .-.... .-.-.. I -Indicates Zone 11 Nea -31 - XX.XXX -Indicates N1T Volume ® -Indicates Intersection Number 60,610 • Total Zone 11 ADT Volume ? NO SCALE Figure 8 2005 ZONE 11 ADT' s LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 04/12/01 FIG20-2-723.DWG LINSCOTT LA\t\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS i 4 a, ......................... ··························· ························· .. . •:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::z.oNt::::::::::::-· . ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Jt::::::::::·:--.. :-::::::::J ::::.·:::.·.·:.·.·:::.·::.·:::::.·.·.·::.·: .·.·.·::: J \fifiltID]Q_. / > i ,. . ·.1 ············ --····•"·'•· .............. .............. 1 : ·:::::. ·:: :: :: :: ... ·:::::.·.·::.·.·.·.·.·:1 :·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:t .·:.·.·.·:::.·:.·:.·:.·.t .·::.·:.·::.·:.·:.·.·:.1 ·::.·.·:::.·:.·::.·:.1 .·:::.·:::::.·::.·.·.1 /:/::;-~·~·J :\:\:] ::::::::.1 . :::::::::.1 . :::::::::::.1 ·:.·.·::.·:.·::.·:.1 ·:::.·:.·:.·:.·::.·1 ·.·::.·:.·:.·.·::::1 \:/}:/::::::: ::::::::::::.·.1 .·::::::::::.·.·J ·:.·::::::.·:.·.·J ·:::::.·::::.·:.1 ·.·.·::.·:::.·:.·:-1 :::::::::::::-1 ::·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:-:•:1 . :::::::::::::::1 . ::::::::::::::::.1 ·.·:.·.·::::::.·:::::.·.1 ·.·:.·.•::::.·:.·:::::.·.1 .. · ... · ... ·:::. ·:. ·:::::: ... :::::::::::::::\:/:\:::: . ·. ·.-.-.-.r-,.·.-.-.-.-.-.-.1 :.;.;.;;J 1.;;,;;.;;,.J LEGEND ,.-.-.-.-.-.·.-··I -lncficates Zone 11 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes © -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 9 2010 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -32-LFMP ZONE 11 EL CAMINO R~ LEUCADIA BOU 'MD/ OUVENHAIN ROAD Cllc!;IO ~~~ -....: ...... !:i:8~ '-.. 240/ 73 NOi .) '\. -789/504 , 118/401 61/ 52!!..) 'itr 336/1133-106/ 333 ", le~iii "'"'S ® !i=l RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE ~ia N .-'ci:'g ,..~ '-.. 92/58 ..1T'---10110 r 101 5 223/46..) "tr 22/ 1-75/29", ~~II) _.., @ ~i'c;-N .. - RANCHO SANTA ~ ROAD/ OLIVENHAIN ROAD CAMINO £.tAAO ,.@.t ,o,-.,o ~1-l '-.. 568/218 .. -5/ 0 ...I+\. r 421/ 98 g1~~ 'it r 5~o, oii @ ~jg REV. 10/19/00 LLG723U2.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENCilNEERS MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD in:3,-. ~~~ "'"'° c!; ;;;~ ..... '-.. 152/129 -sso/488 .) i \. r 5/ 1 513/365..) 'it r 261/515-.. 432/608 ", :a~N N ...... @) il~ II RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE ..., .. o IOU, N N.-.- '~' ! 18 '1 '-.. 102/111 .) ~ \,. -354/112 r 145/ 52 2631105 ..) "t r 246/.214- 101/ 27' 18~8: ::::..s::::.. ® ~ ... ~ N.-- RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD~ LA COSTA MEADOWS DR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ QUESTHAVEN ROAD ca a~ilt ca ..., .-N.- ~ , .. a,::::,';::- le 18~ '-.. 140/ 24 -6/41 ~ '--s2/ 62 ...1,~ r 571/816 tr 84/17..) 'if r 31/13-... ,.. 5/ o, o~t cain i~ @ @ ~~ ..., .. N&'I .. - RANCHO SANTA FE Rw RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ CAMINO DE10 LOS COCH CALLE BARCELONA ~G0 :3iUl N N S;::. ,::::.., N-i~~ '-.. 56/22 5? '-.. 80/ 20 + '--, 126/1s1 .. -84/32 ...Ii~ r 113/54 tr 39/53..) ~, r 26/.92 -11)111 !! 12/13", -~i -~ ...... @ i~ @ ::.,,~ N -- ~ NO SCALE Figure 10 2010 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -33-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 04/12/01 FIG20-2-723.0WG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ························· ·························· ·························· ········· .................. . .. :-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::zaNt::::::::::::-- .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::u::::::::::::::•· ... :::::::: • . ,,;:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::~ \Lilt@[ i < Il .) ·l .... . .. . ·J ............. ............. .............. ········· ..... ·.·::::::::::::.· ... . :: :::.·.·:::::::: I /:\:::::::::::\:J :.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·;,·.·.·.·.·.1 :: . ·. ·. ·::. · .. ::: :: ... 1 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::J -:-:-:-:-:-:-::r.;..;.;,,;;,;a :-:-:-:::-:-:-1 :::::::.1 ::::::::.1 .:::::::::.1 .·:.·.·.·:.·:.·:.·.1 ·:. ·:::. ·::::. ·:.1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: //:/:/::::: . ::::::::::::::. :::::::::::::J :::::::::::::::: . ·::::::::::::J :::::::::::::::: . ·::::::::::::J :::::::::::::::: ,' ·::::::::::::1 L?:\:\??°\t?/Fld . ::::::::::::::::.1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ : . ·: :: . ·:. · .. ::::::::. ·:1 : ::. ·. ·: :. ·:: :: .... :: : ..... \frf~:1LfJ LEGEND j . .-.-.-.-.-.-· ·I -Indicates Zone 11 Area -34- XX,XXX -Indicates ACT Volume @ -Indicates Intersection Number 67,890 = Total Zone 11 ACT Volume ~ NO SCALE Figure 11 2010 ZONE 11 ADis LFMP ZONE 11 RE.V. 04/12/01 FIG20-2-723.DWG LINSCO rI LA\V 8.. GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4 O> -35- LEGEND c::J -Indicates Zone 11 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes @ -Indicates Intersection Number ? NO SCALE Figure 12 2020 CIRCULATION ELEMENT LFMP ZONE 11 EL CAMINO R~ LEUCADIA BOU 'ARD/ OLIVE~~N ROAD Nr--a> Nfl)l'l ........ ::::::... ........ a,11)..- r--ltlv '-.. 438/121 Nfl),.. .)T\.. -894/561 , 1016/550 81/ 468 __,i ~tr 417/1088- 142/ 371 "-, """"''° ~~~ @ ,::::::...::::::... ..-IOCO 1Dr----O>&tl RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ SOUTH M~OSE DRIVE itln U) N..- ...... ~ ...... ..-Cl)II) ..-N '-.. 67/305 ..-U) .)T\._ -6/ 24 , 10/ 74 86/120 __,i ~tr 181/ 14- 99/ BS"-, :;sie ... ., @ ,::::::..., NCIDO O>N..-::3 RANCHO SANTA ~ ROAD/ OLIVENHAIN ROAD CAMINO ,t.k~O "Nt ~~ -~~ '-.. 876/419 ,,/''" -6/ 19 + \._ , 587/176 79/10 __,i ""'tr 19/ s-10/27"-, 011)U) --c ll'>IO @ ........ , ........ 011)11) ,.. o, ID II),- REV. 10/18/00 LL.G723U3.0WG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD It)" II) :rn~ ;::-$~ '-.. 227/186 r--ltlv Nr--N ..) + \.. -521/575 , 60/153 626/314 __,i ~tr 208/529- 716/975 "-, -,-.,.., NN ..,.., ........................ @) °'-N m_ Olo RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE ~8~ l")U) ... ........ ::::::... ........ Ol&t)-&tl-r--'-.. 133/ 78 _..,. ..;Ti... -114/241 , 35/138 356/142 __,i ~tr 164/196- 112/ 36 "-, GIIIG IO G IO -N- @ ........ ~ ...... :;;.,~ Ill - RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD!"k LA COSTA ~EAOOWS DR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ QUESTHAVEN ROAD N l")OO> s _..,.,.., ... ..,., ';::;-£,~ ., '-..360/ 24 .., -a.--CID &tl i '-57/95 ..) + \.. -8/ 40 , 829/985 tr 83/10 __,i ~tr 34/15-r--N 20/10 "-, O&tlO'J '°" a,CD-s~ r--o ........ ........ ::::::... @ @ NIO ..,.~~ a,-IDIDO -- RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ CAMINO DEe0LOS COCHES CALLE BARCELONA :8111 ,..,.._ID "1...-o ID m-~~ ......, ........ ... ..,_ ..,._ ID GI I') '-.. 111/ 41 Lil '-.. 100/ 23 IO T\.. , 141/118 ..IT\. -1011 55 , 220/110 tr 42/118 __,i ""'tr 39/ sa-CIDG 28/ 16 "-, N...-r--ION l')NO ION co.., @ $-;:::. loll) @ ........ ::::::... ........ GC0r---r--11> " . LEGEND '-..AM/PM @ -Traffic Signal -AM/PM ,AM/PM NOTE: (N)-North E-W STREET ~ uJ (S)-South ~ (E)-East Ill ~ I (W)-West z NO SCALE Figure 13 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -36-LFMP ZONE 11 REV. 04/12/01 FIG20-2-723.DWG LIN '-iCOl-r I :-\\\1 & GREENSPAN ENCilNEERS 11,200 ························ ......................... ·······-················· ························· .......................... ························-·· ···························· .... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ZONt::::::::::::-· ~ -~it@]ttlf f mt t 1 ,_ ~ :::.1 ·::.) ... . . .. . -.. ·····-······· ············· .............. ·············· ·:::::::::::::: .. .................... -.-......... :::{:{:{:{:}! ,,, .. :: .. _.. _,c.,._ ·. ·: •. _. ..................... ·.1 ._ ... _ .................. -.... .-.1 ................................ 1 :•:•:-:•:•:•:•:--.;-:.;.;.;.;;,,i :/:/:J ................. 1 ..................... 1 ........................ 1 .......................... 1 ........................... , r r ::rr:::i] ......................... J ........................... ........................... ........................... :/:/~:/:/1 . .. . . . . . . . . ............................. 1 -37- ........................... .-..... 1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ...................................... , ...................................... , ::Jtf~\fflJ LEGEND , ................. ) -lncficates Zone 11 >rea )0(,.)00( -lndk:ates IDT Volume ® -Indicates Intersection Number 67,890 • Total Zone 11 NJT Volume ~ NO SCALE Figure 14 2020 ZONE 11 ADrs LFMP ZONE 11 EXISTING EL CAMINO REALI LEUCADIA BOULEVARD/ OUVENHAIN ROAD .!:,... ---4H+~~ ~ --s 1----j )) ttt ("' --- MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE ltt>AD YEAR 2005 YEAR 2010 YEAR 2020 EL CAMINO REAL/ EL CAMINO REAL/ EL CAMINO REAL/ LEUCADIA BOULEVAAD/ LEUCADIA BOULEVARD/ LEUCADIA BOULEVAAD/ OUVENHAIN ROAD OUVENHAIN ROAD OUVENHAIN ~ .!:,... ~ - -4Hl~~ ~ -4W'--'--~ -4Hl'--~ ~ --s---~s~--~s---- j ,,tttr"' j ,,tttr"' i ,,ttt{ =: ~ == ~ ~ ~ @' @-, @ MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD '--.) a'--'--7 S1------ j ,~ttr --' @) MmGATION MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD '--.) H '--'--7 s---j ,,tty -- MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTA FE R0AD '-.) ,u '--'--7 s----j ,,tty -- @ ~ MmGATION RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANaiO SANTA FE RONJ/ LA COSTA MEADOWS DRIVE LA COSTA M£ADOWS DRIVE LA COSTA MEADOWS DRIVE LA COSTA MEADOWS ORM: w '-u---- tty @ MmGATION @ MmGATION RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ QUESTHAVEN ROAD QUESTHAVEN ROAD QUESTHAVEN ROAD QUESTHAVEN ROAD @ MmGATION LEGEND @ -Traffic Signal FF -Free Flow @ -Unsignalized RTOL -Right-tum Overlap J._ -4U\.. ~ s .....___ 4 ~tttr"' @ MmGATION .!:,... ., ,u '-.\.. ~ s1----4 ,tttr"' @ MmGATION NOTE: (N)-North (S)-South (E)-Eost (W)-West E-W STREET l3 ~ !~ NO SCALE REV. 10/18/00 LLG723U7 .OWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN Figure 15 Mitigation is shown bold. , Existing geometry is shown shaded. LANE GEOMETRY CONDmONS ENGINEERS -38-LFMP ZONE 11 EXISTING YEAR 2005 YEAR 2010 YEAR 2020 RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROO>/ SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE DOES NOT EXIST ••n'--.... ---cs ,- =4'-: "'\tY @ MmGATION -4U\.. 7 s--~ ,tty @ MmGATION -4H\.. 7 s--~ ,ttr- RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROO>/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROO>/ LA COSTA AVENUE LA COSTA AVENUE LA COSTA AVENUE LA COSTA AVENUE -4U\.. ~ s--~ "'\ ttf" @ MmGATION RANCHO SANTA FE RON)/ RANCHO SANTA FE RON)/ RANCHO SANTA FE RON)/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROO>/ CAMINO DE LOS COCHtS CAMINO DE LOS COCHtS CAMINO DE LOS COCHtS . CAMINO DE LOS COCHtS '---U+ \.. ~ s-- tty·· RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROID/ CALLE BARCELONA CALLE BARCaONA CALLE BARCaoNA CALLE BARCELONA ~ -4U \.. 1":SPUT s' SPLIT :!. "'\ ttY , RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE RONJ/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROM:J/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROM:J/ OLIVENHAIN ROAD/ OLIVENHAIN ROAD/ OLIVENHAIN ROAD/ OUVENHAIN ROAD/ CAMINO ALVARO CAMINO Al VARO CAMINO Al VARO CAMINO ALVARO ~H\.. ~~UT ---1S-- sPL1r-f 'ltf" ~ u \.. -i ;;LIT ---f s i---- SPUT-+ ,tY ~U\.. ~gLIT 4U \..\,. }~LIT s s SPLIT-+ "'\tf" SPLIT-+ "'\ ttY @ @) MmGATION E-W STREET 8 ~ 1/1 ~ I z NO SCALE REV. 10/18/00 LLG723U7 .OWG LINSCOTT LA\:V & GREENSPAN Figure 15 Mitigation is shown bold. Existing geometry is shown shaded. LANE GEOMETRY CONDffiONS ENGINEERS -39-LFMP ZONE 11 LIN'--il C >TT I , \\ \ l_'--:_ Cl·ff LNSPAN ENGINEERS APPENDIX A LFMPZONE 11 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain ---SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO: Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: --------PEAKHR :PM -----ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 49 0.01 • NB Left 2 3600 116 0.03 NBThru 3 6000 488 0.08 NB Thru 3 6000 1015 0.17 • NB Right I 1800 391 0.22 NB Right 1 1800 834 0.46 SB Left 2 3600 109 0.03 SB Left 2 3600 218 0.06 • SB Thru 4 8000 9IO 0.15 • SB Thru 4 8000 920 0.17 SB Right 0 0 329 0 SB Right 0 0 433 0 EB Left 2 3600 169 0.05 EB Left 2 3600 368 0.10 EB Thru 3 6000 319 0.05 • EBThru 3 6000 527 0.09 • EB Right 1 1800 81 0.05 EB Right 1 1800 136 0.08 WB Left 2 3800 821 0.22 • WB Left 2 3800 540 0.14 • WB Thru 3 6000 575 0.12 WBThru 3 6000 437 0.09 WB Right 0 0 146 0 WBRight 0 0 109 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.16 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.27 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.43 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.46 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.53 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.56 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: 8 .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 156 0.09 * NB Left 1 1800 248 0.14 * NB Thru 2 4000 797 0.20 NB Thru 2 4000 1058 0.26 NB Right 0 0 0 0.00 NB Right 0 0 0 0.00 SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Thru 1 2000 1,237 0.62 * SB Thru I 2000 776 0.39 • SB Right FF FF 136 0.00 SB Right FF FF 209 0.00 EB Left 1 1800 378 0.21 * EB Left 1 1800 268 0.15 • EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right I 1800 257 0.14 EB Right I 1800 181 0.10 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0. WBThru 0 0 0 0 * WBRight 0 0 0 0 WB Right 0 0 0 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.71 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.53 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.15 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.92 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.68 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 1.02 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.78 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) F LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: 8 .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >l.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION.;.;: __ __;;Ran.c=cc;.;;h:.:co..::Sc.::anc:..:ta.::....;;...Fe;;..;R;;.;;.o.;..;.ad/Lac.::c.::c.::..::C..;;;.os.;..;.ta;.;..Mc...-ea...;.d..;;;.ow.;.;.;_s D;::.;.r INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr ---SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Left 0 0 0 o• NB Thru 2 4000 905 0.23 NBThru 2 4000 1040 0.26 NB Right I 1800 186 0.10 NB Right I 1800 60 0.03 SB Left 1 1800 266 0.15 SB Left 1 1800 76 0.04 SB Thru 1 2000 911 0.46 * SB Thru 1 2000 917 0.46 * SB Right 0 0 8 0 SB Right 0 0 4 0 EB Left 0 0 1 0"' EB Left 0 0 0 o• EB Thru I 2000 5 0.00 EB Thru 1 2000 3 0.00 EB Right 0 0 3 0 EB Right 0 0 1 0 WB Left 0 0 24 0 WB Left 0 0 152 0 WBThru 1 2000 0 0.01 * WBThru 1 2000 0 0.08 * WB Right 1 1800 82 0.05 WBRight I 1800 327 0.18 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.46 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.46 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.01 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.08 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.47 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.54 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.57 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.64 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY: Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru I 2000 942 0.47 • NBThru 1 2000 1045 0.52 NB Right I 1800 32 0.02 NB Right 1 1800 106 0.06 * SB Left I 1800 34 0.02 • SB Left I 1800 168 0.09 * SB Thru I 2000 899 0.45 SB Thru 1 2000 911 0.46 SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 o• EB Thru 0 0 0 0. EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 1 1800 100 0.06 • WB Left 1 1800 43 0.02 * WB Thru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WB Right 1 1800 161 0.09 WBRight 1 1800 59 0,03 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.49 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.06 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.55 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.38 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.65 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.48 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >LO F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: ________ PEA.KHR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: ________ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: ________ AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST: ________ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 1 1800 2 0.00 * NB Left 1 1800 231 0.13 * NBThru 2 4000 565 0.17 NBThru 2 4000 905 0.23 NB Right 0 0 122 0 NB Right 0 0 6 0 SB Left 1 1800 51 0.03 SB Left I 1800 54 0.03 SB Thru 2 4000 847 0.25 * SB Thru 2 4000 647 0.22 * SB Right 0 0 143 0 SB Right 0 0 241 0 EB Left 1 1800 316 0.18 * EB Left 1 1800 316 0.18 "' EB Thru 2 4000 116 0.08 EB Thru 2 4000 120 0.o7 EB Right 0 0 217 0 * EB Right 0 0 160 0 WB Left 1 1800 19 0.01 WB Left 1 1800 5 0.00 WB Thru 2 4000 145 0.05 * WBThru 2 4000 50 0.02 * WB Right 0 0 61 0 WBRight 0 0 42 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.20 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.51 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.55 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.61 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.65 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximwn LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= "' Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 26 lNTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNTDATE: ________ PEAK.HR :_AM ____ _ COUNTDATE: ________ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: ________ AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AMPEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 NBThru 3 6000 646 0.17 • NBThru 3 6000 1106 0.22 • NB Right 0 0 370 0 NB Right 0 0 212 0 SB Left I 1800 65 0.04 • SB Left I 1800 78 0.04 • SB Thru 3 6000 1184 0.20 SB Thru 3 6000 742 0.12 SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 o• EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EBThru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Riidit 0 0 0 0.22 • WBLeft 2 3600 266 0.07 • WBLeft 2 3600 132 0.04* WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBRight I 1800 128 0.07 WBRight I 1800 1S 0.04 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.45 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.57 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.55 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.67 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements 0 .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<• FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E. .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_A_M ____ . __ _ COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M __ _ ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 20 0.oI * NB Left I 1800 21 0.01 NB Thru 3 6000 710 0.15 NBThru 3 6000 1197 0.23 * NB Ri2ht 0 0 176 0 * NBRi2ht 0 0 165 0 SB Left 1 1800 41 0.02 * SB Left 1 1800 38 0.02 * SB Thru 3 6000 1,382 0.24"' SB Thru 3 6000 793 0.14 SB Rhtht 0 0 64 0 SB Right 0 0 25 0 EB Left 1 1800 39 0.02 * EB Left 1 1800 80 0.04 * EBThru 1 2000 35 0.02 EB Thru I 2000 44 0.02 EB Right 1 1800 24 0.ot EB Ri2ht I 1800 35 0.02 WB Left 1 1800 224 0.12 WB Left I 1800 141 0.08 WBThru 2 4000 75 0.05 WBThru 2 4000 44 0.02 WB Right 0 0 111 0 * WBRight 0 0 38 0* NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0,02 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.04 SUM OF CRmCAL VIC RATIO 0.04 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.38 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.14 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.48 LEVEL OF SER VICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 209 0.12 • NB Left I 1800 197 0.11 • NB Thru 2 4000 3 0.05 NBThru 2 4000 18 0.09 NB Right 0 0 200 0 NB Right 0 0 358 0 SB Left I 1800 26 0.01 SB Left 1 1800 17 0.01 SB Thru 2 4000 17 0.00 • SB Thru 2 4000 9 0.00 * SB Right I 1800 18 0.01 SB Right I 1800 9 0.01 EB Left 0 0 6 o• EB Left 0 0 12 0 * EB Thru 1 2000 441 0.23 EB Thru 1 2000 799 0.41 EB Right 0 0 3 0 EB Right 0 0 11 0 WB Left 0 0 395 0 WB Left 0 0 254 0 WBThru I 2000 722 0.56 • WBThru I 2000 581 0.42 * WB Right FF 0 17 FF WB Right FF 0 24 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.11 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.56 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.42 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.68 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.53 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.78 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 • <= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow B .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain --------------------SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: ________ PEAK HR : _A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: ________ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY: Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 54 0.02 * NB Left 2 3600 192 0.05 NB Thru 3 6000 882 0.15 NBThru 3 6000 1335 0.22 • NB Right I 1800 180 0.10 NB Right 1 1800 934 0.52 SB Left 2 3600 66 0.02 SB Left 2 3600 308 0.09 • SB Timi 4 8000 996 0.15 * SB Thru 4 8000 1032 0.15 SB Right 0 0 193 0 SB Right 0 0 155 0 EB Left 2 3600 52 0.01 EB Left 2 3600 388 0.1 I ED Thru 3 6000 154 0.03 * EB Thru 3 6000 857 0.14 • EB Right I 1800 52 O.o3 EB Right I 1800 162 0.09 WB Left 2 3800 639 0.17 • WB Left 2 3800 265 0.07 • WBThru 3 6000 683 0.18 WB Thru 3 6000 305 0.06 WBRight 0 0 420 0 WB Right 0 0 64 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.20 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.37 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.52 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.47 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.62 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road INTERSECTION_: ___ M_e_lr_os_e_D_r_/R_a_nc_h_o_S_an_ta_F_e_R_o_a_d _______ _ SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M __ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 633 0.18 * NB Left 2 3600 409 0.11 • NB Thro 3 6000 772 0.14 NBThru 3 6000 495 0.08 NB Right 0 0 50 0.00 NB Right 0 0 0 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 57 0.02 SB Left 2 3600 14 0.00 SB Thro 2 4000 478 0.12 * SB Thru 2 4000 926 0.23 * SB Right I 1800 365 0.20 SB Right l 1800 559 0.31 EB Left 2 3600 452 0.13 * EB Left 2 3600 405 0.11 • EB Thro 2 4000 98 0.02 EB Thru 2 4000 34 0.01 EB Right I 1800 322 0.18 EB Right I 1800 893 0.50 WB Left l 1800 50 0.03 WBLeft I 1800 75 0.04 WB Thru 2 4000 45 0.01 • WBThru 2 4000 73 0.02 • WBRight l 1800 15 O.ot WB Right I 1800 50 O.o3 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.14 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.13 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.44 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.47 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.IO ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.IO INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION {ICU) 0.54 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.57 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr --------------------SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions COUNTDATE:_"-------PEAKHR :AM COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad --------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -----=----- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Thru 2 4000 1245 0.31 • NBThru 2 4000 782 0.20 NB Right 1 1800 127 0.07 NB Right I 1800 98 0.05 SB Left 1 1800 123 0.07 • SB Left I 1800 195 0.11 SB Thru 2 4000 677 0.17 SB Thru 2 4000 1623 0.41 • SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0. EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left I 1800 74 0.04 • WB Left 1 1800 129 0.07 • WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBRight I 1800 160 0.09 WB Right 1 1800 123 0.07 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.38 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.41 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.04 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0,07 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.42 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.48 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.52 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.58 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru I 2000 817 0.41 * NB Thru I 2000 647 0.32 NB Right I 1800 242 0.13 NB Right I 1800 522 0.29 * SB Left I 1800 135 0.08 * SB Left I 1800 743 0.41 * SB Thru I 2000 616 0.31 SB Thru 1 2000 1010 0.51 SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 * EB Thru 0 0 0 0 * EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 1 1800 475 0.26 * WB Left 1 1800 313 0.17 * WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WB Right I 1800 555 0.31 WBRight 1 1800 237 0.13 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.49 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.75 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.53 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.85 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) D LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximwn LOS Maximwn V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr -----------------SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 14 O.ot • NB Left I 1800 160 0.09 • NBThru 2 4000 815 0.21 NBThru 2 4000 1076 0.27 NB Right 0 0 IO 0 NB Right 0 0 IO 0 SB Left I 1800 59 0.03 SB Left 1 1800 81 0.05 SB Thru 2 4000 1000 0.26 • SB Thru 2 4000 1027 0.26 • SB Right 0 0 27 0 SB Right 0 0 22 0 EB Left I 1800 183 0.10 • EB Left I 1800 36 0.02 • EB Thru I 2000 21 0.05 EB Thru I 2000 6 0.03 EB Right 0 0 85 0 EB Right 0 0 45 0 WB Left I 1800 IO 0.01 WB Left 1 1800 IO 0.01 WB Thru I 2000 IO 0.04 • WB Thru I 2000 IO 0.03 • WBRight 0 0 65 0 WB Right 0 0 47 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.27 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.14 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.05 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.41 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.40 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.51 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.50 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS · Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave ...;.... __ SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: ________ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left l 1800 14 0.01 • NB Left l 1800 151 0.08 NBThru 2 4000 575 0.18 NBThru 2 4000 708 0.23 • NB Right 0 0 137 0 NB Riaht 0 0 228 0 SB Left I 1800 55 0.03 SB Left l 1800 103 0.06 • SB Thru 2 4000 770 0.24 • SB Thru 2 4000 638 0.20 SB Right 0 0 199 0 SB Right 0 0 149 0 EB Left l 1800 114 0.06 • EB Left 1 1800 119 O.o7 EB Thru 2 4000 225 0.08 EB Thru 2 4000 258 0.07 • EB Right 0 0 90 0. EB Right 0 0 26 0 WB Left 1 1800 61 0.03 WB Left 1 1800 209 0.12"' WB Thru 2 4000 154 0.06 • WBThru 2 4000 338 0.10 WB Right 0 0 79 0 WBRiaht 0 0 57 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.19 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.51 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.48 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.61 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.58 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= "' Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Caches INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Caches SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES ()) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Thru 3 6000 673 0.12 NB Thru 3 6000 200 0.05 NB Right 0 0 42 0 NB Right 0 0 IOI 0 SB Left 1 1800 17 0.01 SB Left 1 1800 71 0.04 SB Thru 3 6000 905 0.15 • SB Thro 3 6000 801 0.13 • SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thro 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0.22 • WB Left 2 3600 117 O.D3 • WB Left 2 3600 169 0.05 • WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WB Right I 1800 53 0.03 WB Right 1 1800 1067 0.59 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.15 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.13 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.39 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.44 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.49 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.54 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST: AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 9 0.DI • NB Left I 1800 12 0.01 NBThru 3 6000 634 0.11 NBThru 3 6000 1191 0.24 • NB Right 0 0 30 o• NB Right 0 0 244 0 SB Left I 1800 19 0.Dl • SB Left I 1800 58 0.03 • SB Thru 3 6000 988 0.17 • SB Thru 3 6000 809 0.14 SB Right 0 0 15 0 SB Right 0 0 35 0 EB Left l 1800 24 0.01 • EB Left 1 1800 24 0.01 • EB Thru 1 2000 26 0.ot EB Thru 1 2000 92 0.05 EB Right 1 1800 11 0.01 EB Right 1 1800 12 0.01 WB Left I 1800 173 0.10 WBLeft l 1800 54 O.oJ WBThru 2 4000 84 0.04 WBThru 2 4000 32 0.01 WB Right 0 0 56 o• WB Right 0 0 22 o• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.01 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.01 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.01 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.02 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.35 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.12 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >l.O F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTIQN CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO: Year2005 Conditions SCENARIO: . Year 2005 Conditions COUNTDATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: --------PEAKHR :PM -----ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left l 1800 5 0.00 NB Left I 1800 5 0.00 NB Thru 2 4000 315 0.10 • NBThru 2 4000 1269 0.45 • NB Right 0 0 91 0 NB Right 0 0 518 0 SB Left l 1800 260 0.14 • SB Left I 1800 335 0.19 • SB Thru 2 4000 907 0.23 SB Thru 2 4000 514 0.13 SB Right I 1800 5 0.00 SB Right I . 1800 25 0.01 EB Left 0 0 19 0. EB Left 0 0 8 0. EB Thru I 2000 5 0.01 EB Thru 1 2000 3 O.oI EB Right 0 0 5 0 EB Right 0 0 5 0 WBLeft 0 0 581 0 WB Left 0 0 97 0 WB Thru I 2000 2 0.29 • WBThru l 2000 6 0.05 • WB Right FF 0 339 FF WBRight FF 0 170 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.64 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.05 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.53 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.69 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.79 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM # 23 --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru 2 4000 817 0.20 * NB Right I 1800 242 0.13 SB Left I 1800 135 0.08 * SB Thru 2 4000 616 0.15 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 * EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left I 1800 475 0.26 * WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBRight I 1800 555 0.31 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.54 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.64 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru 2 4000 647 0.16 NB Right I 1800 522 0.29 * SB Left I 1800 743 0.41 * SB Thru 2 4000 1010 0.25 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 * EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left I 1800 313 0.17 * WB Thru 0 0 0 0 WB Right I 1800 237 0.13 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.53 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS). B LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # II INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_A_M ___ ~ COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_PM ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 115 0.03 * NB Left 2 3600 376 0.10 NB Thru 3 6000 556 0.09 NB Thru 3 6000 1310 0.22 • NB Right 1 1800 332 0.18 NB Right l 1800 981 0.55 SB Left 2 3600 52 0.01 SB Left 2 3600 225 0.06 * SB Thru 4 8000 909 0.14 • SB Thru 4 8000 704 O.ll SB Right 0 0 247 0 SB Right 0 0 189 0 EB Left 2 3600 61 0.02 EB Left 2 3600 528 0.15 EB Thru 3 6000 336 0.06 • EB Thru 3 6000 1133 0.19 * EB Right I 1800 106 0.06 EB Right 1 1800 333 0.19 WB Left 2 3800 716 0.19 * WB Left 2 3800 401 0.11 • WBThru 3 6000 769 0.17 WBThru 3 6000 504 0.10 WB Right 0 0 240 0 WB Right 0 0 73 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.42 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.58 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.52 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.68 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 18 . INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AMPEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 686 0.19 * NB Left 2 3600 253 0.07 * NB Thru 3 6000 685 0.12 NB Thru 3 6000 421 0.07 NB Right 0 0 5 0.00 NB Right 0 0 2 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 104 O.o3 SB Left 2 3600 227 0.06 SB Thru 2 4000 406 0.10 * SB Thru 2 4000 853 0.21 * SB Right I 1800 314 0.17 SB Right I 1800 905 0.50 EB Left 2 3600 513 0.14 * EB Left 2 3600 365 0.10 * EB Thru 2 4000 261 0.07 EBThru 2 4000 515 0.13 EB Right 1 1800 432 0.24 EB Right I 1800 608 0.34 WB Left I 1800 5 0.00 WB Left I 1800 1 0.00 WB Thru 2 4000 550 0.14 * WBThru 2 4000 488 0.12 * WB Right 1 1800 152 0.08 WBRight 1 1800 129 O.Q7 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.22 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.57 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.50 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.67 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.60 LEVEL OF SER VICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 • <= FF= Free Flow E .91 • <= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr ---SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 20 IO Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad --------ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0. NBThru 2 4000 1320 0.33 * NB Thru 2 4000 594 0.15 NB Right I 1800 122 0.o7 NB Right 1 1800 57 0.03 SB Left 0 0 0 o• SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Thru 2 4000 753 0.19 SB Thru 2 4000 1399 0.35 • SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0. WBThru 0 0 0 0. WB Right I 1800 52 0.03 WBRight I 1800 82 0.05 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.33 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.33 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.35 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.IO INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.43 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left l 1800 5 0.00 NB Left I 1800 0 0.00 • NB Thru 2 4000 1218 0.30 * NB Thru 2 4000 610 0.15 NB Right I 1800 827 0.46 NB Right l 1800 711 0.40 * SB Left I 1800 237 0.13 * SB Left l 1800 174 0.10 SB Thru 2 4000 551 0.14 SB Thru 2 4000 1243 0.34 * SB Right 0 0 9 0 SB Right 0 0 103 0 EB Left 1 1800 84 0.05 EB Left 1 1800 17 0.01 EB Thru l 2000 31 0.02 * EB Thru 1 2000 13 0,01 * EB Right 0 0 5 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 2 3600 571 0.16 * WB Left 2 3600 816 0.23 * WB Thru 1 2000 6 0.o7 WBThru 1 2000 41 0.03 WB Right 0 0 140 0 WBRight 0 0 24 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.43 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.18 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.61 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.60 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) o'.11 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.70 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements 0 .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >l.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr INTERSECTION-': ___ Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _________ PEAK HR :_P_M __ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (t) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left l 1800 20 0.01 NB Left l 1800 127 0.07 * NB Thru 2 4000 1684 0.42 * NBThru 2 4000 1316 0.33 NB Right 0 0 10 0 NB Right 0 0 5 0 SB Left I 1800 65 0.04 * SB Left I 1800 103 0.06 SB Thru 2 4000 1112 0.30 SB Thru 2 4000 1654 0.48 * SB Rhiht 0 0 70 0 SB Right 0 0 256 0 EB Left 1 1800 223 0.12 * EB Left 1 1800 46 0.03 * EB Thru l 2000 22 0.05 EB Thru l 2000 7 0.02 EB Right 0 0 75 0 EB Right 0 0 29 0 WB Left l 1800 10 O.ot WB Left l 1800 5 0.00 WBThru l 2000 10 0.05 * WBThru l 2000 10 0.03 * WB Right 0 0 92 0 WB Right 0 0 58 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.46 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.55 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.06 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.63 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.61 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.73 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION {ICU) 0.71 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNT DATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left l 1800 14 0.01 NB Left l 1800 155 0.09 • NB Thru 2 4000 1242 0.34 • NB Thru 2 4000 926 0.28 NB RiJ.tht 0 0 123 0 NB Right 0 0 199 0 SB Left 1 1800 83 0.05 • SB Left l 1800 120 O.G7 SB Thru 2 4000 885 0.25 SB Thru 2 4000 1151 0.35 • SB Right 0 0 129 0 SB Right 0 0 263 0 EB Left 1 1800 263 0.15 • EB Left l 1800 105 0.06 • EB Thru 2 4000 246 0.09 EB Thru 2 4000 214 0.06 EB Riirnt 0 0 101 0. EB Right 0 0 27 0 WB Left 1 1800 145 0.08 WB Left l 1800 52 0.03 WB Thru 2 4000 354 0.11 • WBThru 2 4000 112 0.06 • WB Right 0 0 102 0 WB Right 0 0 111 0 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.39 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.44 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.65 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.56 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.75 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.66 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 NBThru 3 6000 1299 0.23 * NB Thru 3 6000 1260 0.25 * NB Right 0 0 74 0 NB Right 0 0 238 0 SB Left 1 1800 17 0.01 * SB Left 1 1800 85 0.05 * SB Thru 3 6000 1021 0.17 SB Thru 3 6000 1238 0.21 SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Left 0 0 0 o• EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0.22 * WB Left 2 3600 126 0.04 * WB Left 2 3600 191 0.05 * WBThru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WB Right 1 1800 80 0.04 WB Right I 1800 20 0.01 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.48 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.61 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.58 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.71 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >LO INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION....;: ___ Ra_nc_h_o_S..;;;.an""'ta.;.;..;...Fe_R....;oac.:.d/ __ C;;...a __ ll_e _B __ ar--ce--lo_n_a _____ _ INTERSECTION_: ___ Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M __ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ---------------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 11 0.01 NB Left 1 1800 15 0.01 NB Thru 3 6000 1,237 0.21 NBThru 3 6000 1428 0.28 • NB Right 0 0 30 o• NB Right 0 0 244 0 SB Left I 1800 19 0.01 • SB Left 1 1800 58 0,03"' SB Thru 3 6000 1,091 0.19 SB Thru 3 6000 1284 0.22 SB Right 0 0 44 0 SB Right 0 0 53 0 EB Left I 1800 39 0.02 • EB Left 1 1800 53 O.o3* EBThru 1 2000 26 O.ot EB Thru 1 2000 92 0.05 EB Right 1 1800 12 O.ot EB Right 1 1800 13 0.01 WB Left 1 1800 173 0.10 WB Left 1 1800 54 0,03 WB Thru 2 4000 84 0.04 WBThru 2 4000 32 0.01 WB Right 0 0 56 0. WB Right 0 0 22 0"' NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.01 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.03 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.03 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.37 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.13 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.47 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS ·. Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO : Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: --------PEAKHR :PM -----ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 5 0.00 NB Left 1 1800 0 0.00 NB Thru 2 4000 653 0.18 • NB Thru 2 4000 1467 0.48 • NB Right 0 0 60 0 NB Right 0 0 445 0 SB Left I 1800 256 0.14 * SB Left I 1800 490 0.27 • SB Thru 2 4000 1027 0.26 SB Thru 2 4000 801 0.20 SB Right 1 1800 5 0.00 SB Right l 1800 0 0.00 EB Left 0 0 5 0 * EB Left 0 0 0 0"' EB Thru 1 2000 5 0.01 EB Thru 1 2000 0 0.00 EB Right 0 0 5 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 421 0 WB Left 0 0 98 0 WBThru l 2000 5 0.21 • WBThru 1 2000 0 0.05"' WBRight FF 0 568 FF WBRight FF 0 218 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.75 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.05 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.53 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.80 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.90 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SER VICE (LOS) D LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 22 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM --------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru 3 6000 1320 0.24 * NB Right 0 0 122 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0. SB Thru 3 6000 753 0.13 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0. WB Right l 1800 52 O.o3 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.24 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.34 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 22 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM -------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Thru 3 6000 594 0.11 NB Right 0 0 57 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Thru 3 6000 1399 0.23 * SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0. WB Right I 1800 82 0.05 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.23 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.33 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions # 23 COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_A_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AMPEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 5 0.00 NB Thru 3 6000 1218 0.20 • NB Right I 1800 827 0.46 SB Left I 1800 237 0.13 • SBThru 3 6000 551 0.09 SB Right 0 0 9 0 EB Left I 1800 84 0.05 EB Thru I 2000 31 0.02 • EB Right 0 0 5 0 WBLeft 2 3600 571 0.16 • WBThru I 2000 6 0.07 WBRight 0 0 140 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.33 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.18 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.51 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.61 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow B .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation . # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Year 20 IO Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_PM ___ _ ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 0 0.00 • NBThru 3 6000 610 0.10 NB Right 1 1800 711 0.40 • SB Left 1 1800 174 0.10 SB Thru 3 6000 1243 0.22 • SB Right 0 0 103 0 EB Left 1 1800 17 0.01 EB Thro 1 2000 13 0.01 • EB Right 0 0 0 0 WBLeft 2 3600 816 0.23 • WBThru 1 2000 41 0.03 WBRight 0 0 24 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITIC~L SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.60 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.70 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions # 24 COUNT DATE: ________ PEAKHR :_A_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left l 1800 20 0.01 NBThru 3 6000 1684 0.28 * NB Right 0 0 IO 0 SB Left 1 1800 65 0.04 * SB Thru 3 6000 1112 0.20 SB Right 0 0 70 0 EB Left I 1800 223 0.12 * EB Thru 1 2000 22 0.05 EB Right 0 0 75 0 WB Left 1 1800 IO 0.01 WBThru 1 2000 10 0.05 * WB Right 0 0 92 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.49 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.59 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 • <= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 24 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr ---SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: ________ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 1 1800 127 0.07 • NBThru 3 6000 1316 0.22 NB Right 0 0 5 0 SB Left 1 1800 103 0.06 SB Thru 3 6000 1654 0.32 * SB Right 0 0 256 0 EB Left l 1800 46 0.03 • EB Thru 1 2000 7 0.02 EB Right 0 0 29 0 WB Left I 1800 5 0.00 WBThru 1 2000 10 0.03 * WBRight 0 0 58 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.39 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.06 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.45 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.55 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 25 INTERSECTION.;.;: __ .......;;Ran=c.;.;h;;.;;o..;;S:;::an;;.;.;ta;;;.;:.,.Fe;;..;R;;.;;o::..:a:;::d/L=a.::Cc.::.os;;.;;ta:;.;A;..;;v.;.;e'---- SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :.;...A.;_M;...._ __ _ ANALYST: ________ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 14 0.01 NB Thru 3 6000 1242 0.23 * NB Right 0 0 123 0 SB Left 1 1800 83 0.05 * SB Thru 3 6000 885 0.17 SB Right 0 0 129 0 EB Left 1 1800 263 0.15 * EB Thru 2 4000 246 0.09 EB Right 0 0 101 0 * WB Left 1 1800 145 0.08 WBThru 2 4000 -354 0.11 * WB Right 0 0 102 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.54 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.64 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 25 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST: --~-----AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 155 0.09 * NB Thru 3 6000 926 0.19 NB Right 0 0 199 0 SB Left 1 1800 120 0,07 SB Thru 3 6000 1151 0.24 * SB Right 0 0 263 0 EB Left 1 1800 105 0.06 * EB Thru 2 4000 214 0.06 EB Right 0 0 27 0 WB Left 1 1800 52 0,03 WBThru 2 4000 112 0.06 * WBRight 0 0 111 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.33 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.45 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.55 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 11 INTERSECTION_: _____ E_I_C_mru.......,·n_o_R_eal/L ____ eu_c_ad_i_a/_O_liv_e_n_ha_in __ _ INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Leucadia/Olivenhain SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM ---------------------------ANALYST: AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 161 0.04 * NB Left 2 3600 434 0.12 NBThru 3 6000 975 0.16 NB Thru 3 6000 1409 0.23 • NB Right I 1800 516 0.29 NB Right I 1800 1126 0.63 SB Left 2 3600 141 0.04 SB Left 2 3600 399 0.11 * SB Thru 4 8000 1,358 0.20 * SB Thru 4 8000 1377 0.20 SB Right 0 0 279 0 SB Right 0 0 227 0 EB Left 2 3600 81 0.02 EB Left 2 3600 468 0.13 EB Thru 3 6000 417 0.07 • EB Thru 3 6000 1088 0.18 * EB Right 1 1800 142 0.08 EB Right I 1800 371 0.21 WBLeft 2 3800 1,016 0.27 * WB Left 2 3800 550 0.14 * WB Thru 3 6000 894 0.22 WBThru 3 6000 561 0.11 WB Right 0 0 438 0 WBRight 0 0 121 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.58 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.66 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.68 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.76 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 18 INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ----- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 969 0.27 • NB Left 2 3600 321 0.09 • NBThru 3 6000 1,011 0.17 NB Thru 3 6000 527 0.09 NB Right 0 0 2 0.00 NB Right 0 0 3 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 249 0.07 SB Left 2 3600 228 0.06 SB Thru 2 4000 154 0.19 • SB Thru 2 4000 1207 0.30 • SB Right I 1800 277 0.15 SB Right 1 1800 835 0.46 EB Left 2 3600 626 0.17 • EB Left 2 3600 314 0.09 * EB Thru 2 4000 208 0.05 EB Thru 2 4000 529 0.13 EB Right I 1800 716 0.40 EB Right 1 1800 915 0.54 WB Left I 1800 60 0.03 WB Left 1 1800 153 0.09 WB Thru 2 4000 521 0.13 • WBThru 2 4000 515 0.14 * WB Right I 1800 227 0.13 WBRight 1 1800 186 0.10 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.46 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.39 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.76 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.62 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.IO ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.IO INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.86 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.72 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) D LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 22 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Meadows Dr -----------------SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0. NB Thru 3 6000 1924 0.35 * NB Thru 3 6000 757 0.14 NB Right 0 0 158 0 NB Right 0 0 72 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0. SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Thru 3 6000 1363 0.23 SB Thru 3 6000 2120 0.35 • SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0. WBThru 0 0 0 0. WB Right I 1800 57 0.03 WBRight 1 1800 95 0.05 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.00 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.35 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.35 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 23 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM ---------------------------ANALYST: AGENCY: C_a_r_lsb_a_d __ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 1 1800 64 0.04 NB Left 1 1800 90 0.05 NBThru 3 6000 1640 0.27 • NBThru 3 6000 785 0.13 NB Right 1 1800 1048 0.58 NB Right 1 1800 1013 0.56 • SB Left I 1800 514 0.29 • SB Left I 1800 639 0.36 • SB Thru 3 6000 896 0.15 SB Thru 3 6000 1540 0.28 SB Right 0 0 12 0 SB Right 0 0 113 0 EB Left 1 1800 83 0.05 EB Left 1 1800 IO 0.01 EB Thru 1 2000 34 0.03 • EB Thru 1 2000 15 0.01 • EB Right 0 0 20 0 EB Right 0 0 IO 0 WB Left 2 3600 829 0.23 • WB Left 2 3600 985 0.27 • WB Thru 1 2000 8 0.18 WBThru I 2000 40 0.03 WB Right 0 0 360 0 WB Right 0 0 24 0 NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.56 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.82 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.64 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICln 0.92 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.74 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) E LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 24 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/South Melrose Dr SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 92 0.05 NB Left 1 1800 130 0.07 * NBThru 3 6000 2328 0.39 * NBThru 3 6000 1644 0.28 NB Rij!,ht 0 0 10 0 NB Rij!,ht 0 0 10 0 SB Left 1 1800 8 0.00 * SB Left I 1800 66 0.04 SB Thru 3 6000 1628 0.29 SB Thru 3 6000 2157 0.41 * SB Right 0 0 111 0 SB Right 0 0 274 0 EB Left 1 1800 86 0.05 EB Left 1 1800 120 0.07 * EBThru 1 2000 181 0.14 * EB Thru 1 2000 14 0.05 EB Right 0 0 99 0 EB Right 0 0 86 0 WB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 * WB Left 1 1800 74 0.04 WB Thru 1 2000 6 0.04 WBThru 1 2000 24 0.16 * WB Right 0 0 67 0 WBRij!,bt 0 0 305 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.39 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.48 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.15 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.54 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.71 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.64 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.81 LEVEL OF SER VICE {LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) D LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >l.0 F >J.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 25 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Ave SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNTDATE: PEAKHR :AM --------------COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :_P_M ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 30 0.02 NB Left I 1800 156 0.09 * NB Thru 3 6000 1865 0.32 * NBThru 3 6000 1268 0.24 NB Right 0 0 79 0 NB Right 0 0 156 0 SB Left 1 1800 71 0.04 • SB Left 1 1800 141 0.08 SB Thru 3 6000 1415 0.26 SB Thru 3 6000 1600 0.32 * SB Right 0 0 159 0 SB Right 0 0 348 0 EB Left I 1800 356 0.20 • EB Left I 1800 142 0.08 • EB Thru 2 4000 164 O.Q7 EB Thru 2 4000 196 0.06 EB Right 0 0 112 o• EB Right 0 0 36 0 WB Left I 1800 35 0.02 WB Left I 1800 138 0.08 WBThru 2 4000 114 0.06 • WBThru 2 4000 241 0.08 • WB Right 0 0 133 0 WB Right 0 0 78 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.41 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.16 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.62 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.57 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.72 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.67 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 26 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe/Camino De Los Coches SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 NB Thru 3 6000 1874 0.32 * NBThru 3 6000 1558 0.30 • NB Right 0 0 57 0 NB Right 0 0 226 0 SB Left I 1800 18 0.01 * SB Left I 1800 88 0.05 • SB Thru 3 6000 1545 0.26 SB Thru 3 6000 1686 0.28 SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0. EB Left 0 0 0 0 * EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0.22 • WB Left 2 3600 141 0.04 * WB Left 2 3600 118 0.03"' WB Thru 0 0 0 0 WBThru 0 0 0 0 WB Right 1 1800 100 0.06 WBRight I 1800 23 0.01 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.33 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.57 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.66 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.67 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.76 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= C .71-<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 27 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNTDATE: _______ PEAK HR :_A_M ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM -------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 16 0.01 NB Left I 1800 32 0.02 NB Thru 3 6000 1,778 0.31 NBThru 3 6000 1624 0.32 • NB Right 0 0 51 0. NB Right 0 0 307 0 SB Left l 1800 31 0.02 • SB Left 1 1800 106 0.06 • SB Thru 3 6000 1,593 0.28 SB Thru 3 6000 1647 0.28 SB Right 0 0 61 0 SB Right 0 0 51 0 EB Left I 1800 42 0.02 • EB Left 1 1800 118 0.07 • EB Thru I 2000 39 0.02 EB Thru I 2000 98 0.05 EB Right I 1800 28 0.02 EB Right I 1800 16 0.01 WB Left I 1800 220 0.12 WB Left I 1800 110 0.06 WB Thru 2 4000 101 o.os WBThru 2 4000 55 0.02 WB Right 0 0 111 0. WB Right 0 0 41 0. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0,07 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.04 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.41 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.14 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.51 LEVEL OF SER VICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >l.0 F >l.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro INTERSECTION: • :Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------COUNTDATE: _______ PEAK HR :_PM ___ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 10 0.01 NB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 NBThru 2 4000 895 0.27 • NB Thru 2 4000 1518 0.52 • NB Right 0 0 168 0 NB Right 0 0 566 0 SB Left l 1800 477 0.27 • SB Left 1 1800 776 0.43 • SB Thru 2 4000 1350 0.34 SB Thru 2 4000 922 0.23 SB Right 1 1800 18 0.01 SB Right I 1800 75 0.04 EB Left 0 0 79 0. EB Left 0 0 10 0. EB Thru 1 2000 19 0.05 EB Thru 1 2000 8 0.02 EB Ri.e;ht 0 0 10 0 EB Right 0 0 27 0 WB Left 0 0 587 0 WB Left 0 0 176 0 WB Thru 1 2000 6 0.30 • WBThru I 2000 19 0.10"' WB Right FF 0 876 FF WB Right FF 0 419 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.54 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.95 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.10 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.84 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 1.05 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.94 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 1.15 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) E LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) F LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow. E .91-<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM # 18 --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 969 0.27 • NB Thru 3 6000 1,011 0.17 NB Right 0 0 2 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 249 0.07 SB Thru 3 6000 754 0.13 • SB Right 1 1800 277 0.15 EB Left 2 3600 626 0.17 • EB Thru 2 4000 208 0.05 EB Right 2 3600 716 0.20 WBLeft 1 1800 60 O.QJ WBThru 2 4000 521 0.13 • WB Right 1 1800 227 0.13 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.40 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.70 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.80 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 18 INTERSECTION: Melrose Dr/Rancho Santa Fe Road SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM -------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 321 0.09 • NBThru 3 6000 527 0.09 NB Right 0 0 3 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 228 0.06 SB Thru 3 6000 1207 0.20 • SB Right 1 1800 835 0.46 EB Left 2 3600 314 0.09 • EB Thru 2 4000 529 0.13 EB Right 2 3600 975 0.27 WB Left I 1800 153 0.09 WBThru 2 4000 575 0.14 • WBRight 1 1800 186 0.10 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.52 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.62 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM # 23 --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 64 0.04 NB Thru 3 6000 1640 0.27 * NB Right 1 1800 1048 0.58 SB Left 2 3600 514 0.14 * SB Thru 3 6000 896 0.15 SB Right 1 1800 12 0.01 EB Left 1 1800 83 0.05 EB Thru I 2000 34 O.o3 • EB Right 0 0 20 0 WB Left 2 3600 829 0.23 * WBThru 1 2000 8 0.18 WBRight 0 0 360 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.41 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.67 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.77 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 23 INTERSECTION: · Rancho Santa Fe Road/Questhaven Road SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM ------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (J) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 1 1800 90 0.05 • NBThru 3 6000 785 0.13 NB Right 1 1800 1013 0.56 • SB Left 2 3600 639 0.18 SB Thru 3 6000 1540 0.26 * SB Right 1 1800 113 0.06 EB Left I 1800 10 0.01 EBThru 1 2000 15 0.01 • EB Right 0 0 10 0 WB Left 2 3600 985 0.27 * WBThru 1 2000 40 O.Q3 WBRight 0 0 24 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.64 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.74 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >l.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 NB Thru 3 6000 895 0.18 * NB Right 0 0 168 0 SB Left 2 3600 477 0.13 * SB Thru 3 6000 1350 0.23 SB Right 0 0 18 0 EB Left 0 0 79 0. EB Thru 1 2000 19 0.05 EB Right 0 0 10 0 WB Left 0 0 587 0 WB Thru 1 2000 6 0.30"' WBRight FF 0 876 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.30 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.61 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.71 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION With Mitigation # 28 INTERSECTION: Rancho Santa Fe Road/Olivenhain/Caminao Alvaro SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---"-----------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 NB Thru 3 6000 1518 0.35 * NB Right 0 0 566 0 SB Left 2 3600 776 0.22 * SB Thru 3 6000 922 0.17 SB Right 0 0 75 0 EB Left 0 0 10 o• EB Thru 1 2000 8 0.02 EB Right 0 0 27 0 WB Left 0 0 176 0 WB Thru I 2000 19 0.10"' WB Right FF 0 419 FF NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.57 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.10 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.67 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.77 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= "' Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 A-6 DISTRICT WILL SERVE LETTERS June,2000 1111111:at◄ \ ASSOCIATES, INC. April 11, 2001 Mr. Timothy O'Grady Morrow Development Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services 6965 El Camino Real, Suite 105 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 2647-00 Re: Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) Response to Morrow Development Request For Will Serve Letter for The Oaks and The Ridge, Carlsbad Tentative Map 99-04 Dear Mr. 0' Grady: This letter provides a response to your request dated April 4, 2001 for sewer availability from Leucadia County Water District (District), dated April 4, 2001 for The Oaks and The Ridge. LCWD will serve between 614 and 635 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs), as requested, conditional on the following items. There are future do\VJ'lstream sewer improvements planned that will provide sewer service to the subject areas including the: Leucadia Pump Station Improvements; Batiquitos Influent Sewer; Batiquitos Pump Station Improvements, and Occidental Sewer Improvements. Additional downstream improvements only applying to the Oaks includes the North Green Valley Trunk Sewer and only applying to The Ridge includes the La Costa Meadows Trunk Sewer. These projects are scheduled in the 1999 LCWD Wastewater Master Plan and will be funded by existing LCWD reserves and future connection fees. The District owns adequate capacity at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility to treat wastewater from the subject project. Attached are Exhibits D and E that show the existing and proposed sewer service areas and agencies. LCWD supports the proposed Sewer District Boundary shown in Exhibit E. To achieve the proposed conditions: 1) an annexation of development area 3.7 to Valecitos Water District (VWD) from LCWD's current shere of influence would be required; and 2) the detachment of a portion of development areas 3.3 and 3.5 shown thereon would be required. Resolution of the final boundary location will require agreement between LCWD, VWD, and LAFCO. Attached are Exhibits F and G that show the existing and proposed sewer service areas and agencies. LCWD supports the proposed Sewer District Boundary shown in Exhibit G. To achieve the proposed Exhibit G conditions: development areas 2.3 and 2.4 would have to be annexed from VWD the sphere of influence to LCWD. Resolution of the final boundary location will require agreement between LCWD, VWD, and LAFCO. Tentative and Final Maps, Grading Plans, and hnprovement Plans must be submitted to the District for review. A tentative map review deposit of $1,000 each for The Oaks and The Ridge ($2,000 total) is required at this time for preparation of this sewer service letter and some ·preliminary EDU analysis. Any unused tentative map funds will become available towards additional plan check and inspection deposits required. Following plan check, the developer must enter into a development agreement with the District 9.6 Mr. Timothy O'Grady Sewer A vailabilityfor The Oaks and The Ridge April 11, 2001 Pagei'o/2 and make deposits for field inspection and television inspection of all new sewer work. Actual costs may vary depending on the issues encountered during the map review, plan checking, and construction inspection process. Connection fees must be paid after acceptance of sewer construction and prior to house connection. The District assesses connection fees of $3,950 for each EDU within the development. A single family house, condominium, or apartment is one EDU. Please note that connection fees are adjusted on a District-wide basis from time to time. The District also assesses an annual sewer service fee last adjusted (reduced) on July 1, 1999 to $155 per residential unit per year. Annual sewer service charges are also adjusted from time to time by LCWD. The project will increase District maintenance requirements. Annual sewer service fees paid by the new residents will cover the additional cost of this increased maintenance including pumping, transmission, treatment, and disposal. In summary, LCWD will provide sewer service to The Oaks and The Ridge in accordance with the above conditions. Please call, if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. £~11 LCWD District Engineer cc: Mr. Mike Bardin, LCWD General Manager . Mr. Frank Reynaga, LCWD Customer Service Ms. Susanne Lockhart, Dudek, Plan Checking Mr. Dexter Wilson, Dexter Wilson Development Mr. Michael D. Ott, LAFCO, re Sphere of Influence Update Program 9.7 11:11 UALLECITOS WATER DIST ➔ 9292705 NO.785 ~ VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT A PUBLIC AGENCY 201 Vallecitos de Oro • San Marcos. California • 92069·1453 April 26, 200 l Mr. Timothy O'Grady Morrow Development 6965 El Camino Real, Ste. 105 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Telephone (760)744-0460 RE: WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Upon review of the above referenced property, the following infonnation is provided: Ponions of tbe project is within the boundaries of the Valleci10s Water District and Sewer lmprovement District's I, 2. & 6. Water and sewer will only be provided u.nder the rules and regulations of the District under nonnal operating conditions and after all required fees have been paid and all conditions of the District have been satisfied. It appears that a majority of the Ridge Yi/loge Development plan is within the boundqiies of the District Those portjons within the Ridge Village Development plan that are outside the Oistric1 will require annexation prior to service being available. This approval will include the detachment of the property from the adjacent agency and approvaJ by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Portions of rhe project requiring gravity sewer will require detachment from the District and annexation into the Leucadia County Water District for sewer service. The use of lift stations are strongly discouraged if other means of providing service are available. The DisD'ict maintains existing water distribution facilities in Rancho Santa Fe Road, Alga Road, Melrose, and El Fuerte surrounding this project. As·a condition of approval, Master plan facilities for the area may be required. This could include but is not limited to upgrades to the local water distribution systern, and the constrUction of an additional reservoir (Meadowlark Reservoir No. 3) as indicated in the 1997 Master Plan of approximately 4.8 million gallons. The appropriate Fire Department should be contacted to verify fire flow requirements and any fire protection facilities neec!ed. Once fire flow requirements are obuiined, a hydraulic amdysii wil1 be required to detemi ine the availability of domestic service and fire protection to rhe area, and the sizing of on-site and off-site facilities. The developer of the project shall be responsible for all costs associated with the instaJlation of new water facilities and the relocation or upgTading of existing water facilities impacted by chc projcci. The District also maini.ains sewer facilities adjacent to the Ridge Village Development area. Al the time improvement plans are submitted for review, any upgrades or Master Plan sewer facilities needed to .9erve the project will be determined. Recent discussions indicated thnt a portion pf the project can not gravity sewer to the District nor the Leucadia County Water District and a sewer pump station for approximately SO to 100 homes may be required. This will need to be reviewed to determine if there are any other attematives. 171e \\Se of lift stations are strongly discouraged if other means of providing service are available. FAX numbers by Depar Meadowlark ~ 9.8 -.3507; Finance (760) 744·5989; •,manes (760) 744•6246 11:11 UALLECITOS WATER DIST ➔ 9292705 Mr. Timothy O'Grady Water and Sewer Availability Vi11a.ges of La Costa April 26, 2001 Page 2 NO.785 The majority of the Oaks Vilfage Developmem plan and the Greens Village Developmem plan appear to be outside the boundaries of the VaUecitos w~ter District. For any portions of the project that are within the boundaries of the Vallecitos Water District, detachment of the property from the District may be required. As previously indicated annexation/detachment proceedings will require approval from each agency involved in addition to LAFCO. The District maintains easements and rightS-of-way within the Oaks and Greens Yi/loge De..,elopme,11 plans. Within these easements, a major outfall sewer line and failsafe/reclamation outfall line transport sewage to the Encina Wa~tewater Authority. These facilities must be protected in place and no grading or construction over these facilities will be allowed without the written consent of the Vallecitcs Water District. Portions of these focilities may require replacement or realignment during the development of the property. Portions of the proposed development surround the existing Meadowlark Wastewater Reclamation Facility, and the Mahr Reservoir. It is important to note that these facilities process raw sewage, generate and store redaimed water for the District a.nd the C iLy of Carlsbad. TI1e Meadowlark Wastewater Reclamation Faci I ity currently treats approximately 2.25 million gal Ions ofraw sewage per day and may be upgraded in the funtre to treat S million gallons of raw sew1-,ge .. per day. The Mahr Reservoir is an open reservoir storing approximately 54 million gallons of reef aimed water. Proper disclosures to new property owners regarding the prmdm ity of these facilities to any new homes will be required. This will include disclosures on the map and in the escrow instructions. An inundmion study was prepared/or the Mahr Reservoir Dam in July of J 992, by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. TMs study 011tlines the drni11age.lspillway flow for t/1e resel'Voir. Proposed grading and portions of the development appear to be witllin this drainage area requiring mitigation. The preparation of a new l·tudy and review by the Yallecitos Water Di.strict will be required. Any costs incu"ed shall be borne by the owner of tl,e project. TI1e City of Carlsbad is currently coordinating the upgrades and realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. 11,e plans in.elude water nnd sewer stub-outs fonhe proposed development of this project. As these are developer contributed facilities, they will npt be fonded by the District. It is recommended that the developer contact the City of Carlsbad and coordinate any reimbursements for these facilities. Any water facililies not with the public right-of-way will require a mioimum 20-foot easement granted to the District. In aodition, the District may require easements through the property for future e~1ensions. The owner of the project is responsible for obtaining any easements and expenses incurred. This letter is issued for planning purposes only, and is not a representation, expressed or implied, that the district will provide service a.t a future date. The Vallecitos Water District relics one hundred percent on imported water supplies, and although the District may have available capacity at this time, di1e to the uncenainty of water supplies, water may not be available at the time this project is built. Commitments to provide service are made by the District's Board of Directors and are subject to compliance with Discric-i fees. charges, rules, and regulations. lf therc are any additional questions please.give me a call. Sincerely, VALLECJTOS WATER DISTRICT ~- ~om~ Engineering Supervisor 9.9 cc: Denni!; L11mh OirP.r.tn (;102