HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 13; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 13; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 13; 1995-10-01Zone 73
Local Facilities Management Plan
October 1995
Prepared For:
The Carltas Company
Prepared By:
Hofman Planning Associates
O'Day Consultants
KAKU Associates, Inc.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRkM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 13
Prepared For:
City of Carlsbad
Growth Management Division
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
Prepared By:
Hofman Planning Associates
O’Day Consultants
KAKU Associates, Inc.
October 1995
INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN
CONSULTANTS:
HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
2386 Faraday Ave.
Suite 120
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 438-1465
Bill Hofman
Lisa King
Dan King
O'DAY CONSULTANTS
7220 Avenida Encinas
Second Floor
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Pat O'Day
Jeffrey L. Mitchell
KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC.
1453 Third Street, Suite 400
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Patrick Gibson
Brian Mayeda
CITY OF CARLSBAD:
Marty Orenyak. Community Development Director
Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst
Don Neu, Senior Planner
Bob Johnson, Traffic Engineer
SPONSORING LAND OWNER:
CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY
5600 Avenida Encinas
Suite 100
Carlsbad, CA 92008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Thapter Page #
I . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................... 1
I1 . INTRODUCTION ......................................... 22
I11 . BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS ................................. 27
IV . PHASING PROJECTIONS ................................... 35
V . ZONE 13 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES . . 46
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES .......................... 48
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 48
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 48
MITIGATION ........................................ 53
FINANCING ........................................ 53
LIBRARY FACILITIES ..................................... 55
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 55
MITIGATION ........................................ 61
FINANCING ........................................ 61
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 55
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ....................... 64
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 64
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 64
MITIGATION ........................................ 68
FINANCING ........................................ 68
PARK FACILITIES ........................................ 74
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 74
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 74
MITIGATION ........................................ 76
FINANCING ........................................ 76
DRAINAGE FACILITIES .................................... 77
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 77
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 77
MITIGATION ........................................ 81
FINANCING ........................................ 82
i October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page #
CIRCULATION FACILITIES ................................. 85
PERFORMANCE STANDARD .... ....................... 85
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ........... 85
MITIGATION ....................................... 102
FINANCING ....................................... 112
FIRE FACILITIES ........................................ 115
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........................... 115
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS .......... 115
MITIGATION ....................................... 117
FINANCING ....................................... 117
OPEN SPACE FACILITIES ................................. 118
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........................... 118
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS .......... 118
MITIGATION ....................................... 120
FINANCING ....................................... 120
SCHOOL FACILITIES ..................................... 122
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........................... 122
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS .......... 122
MITIGATION ....................................... 124
FINANCING ....................................... 125
SEWER FACILITIES ...................................... 126
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........................... 126
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS .......... 126
MITIGATION ....................................... 139
FINANCING ....................................... 140
WATER FACILITIES ..................................... 143
PERFORMANCE STANDARD ............................ 143
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS .......... 143
MITIGATION ....................................... 156
FINANCING ....................................... 157
FACILITY FINANCING .................................... 160
VI . REFERENCES .......................................... 218
APPENDICES ........................................... 219
a October 1995 Zone 13 w;MP
A-1.
A-2.
A-3.
A-Q.
A-5.
A-6.
A-7,
A-8.
CONSTRAINTS MAP
LIBRARY -
PARKS -
DRAINAGE -
CIRCULATION - -.
-
SEWER
WATER -
OWNERSHIP -
AGENDA BILL 8867
AGENDA BILL 10,578
PARKS INVENTORY
CITY MEMO FROM PLANNING
DIRECTOR TO CITY MANAGER DATED
AGENDA BILL 9122-1 WIATTACH.
7-30-87
DRAINAGE COST ESTIMATES
TRAFFIC REPORT
COST ESTIMATES
CANNON ROAD WEST FEE PROGRAM
SEWER COST ESTIMATES
WATER COST ESTIMATES
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS
Zone 13 LFMP iii October 1995
Exhibit #
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Page #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
~
Map Zone 13 Location Map ............................... 2
Table Zone 13 Existing Public Facilities Summary ................. 5
Table Zone 13 Build Out Public Facilities Summary ................ 6
Table General Conditions for Zone 13 ......................... 7
Table Special Conditions For Zone 13 ......................... 9
Map Landowners .................................... 24
Map General Plan Designations ........................... 25
Map Land Use Zoning ................................. 26
Map Constraints Map .................................. 28
Table Existing Constraints Analysis ......................... 29
Table Existing Non-Residential Build Out Projections .............. 33
Table Proposed Non-Residential Build Out Projections ............. 34
Table Citywide Residential Phasing .......................... 36
Table Citywide Non-Residential Phasing ...................... 41
Table Zone 13 Non-Residential Phasing ....................... 45
Map City Administrative Facilities ......................... 49
Table Northwest Quadrant Residential Phasing .................. 39
Table NW Quadrant Non-Residential Phasing ................... 44
Table City Administrative Phasing Projections .................. 52
Table City administrative Financing Matrix .................... 54
Table Library Phasing Projections .......................... 60
Map Wastewater Facilities ............................... 65
Table Carlsbad Projections ............................... 68
Table Wastewater Financing Matrix ......................... 69
Map Drainage Basins .................................. 78
Table Drainage Financing Matrix ........................... 83
Map Existing Circulation Network ......................... 87
Map 2000 Circulation Trip Distribution ...................... 88
Map Build Out Circulation Trip Distribution ................... Table Circulation Financing Matrix .........................
Map Existing Fire Response Time ......................... 116
Map Open Space Locations ............................. 119
Table Open Space Inventory ............................. 121
Map School District Locations ........................... 123
Map Sewer Districts .................................. 127
Map Sewer Basin Boundaries ............................ 128
Table Existing BSMINCI ............................... 129
Map Library Facilities ................................. 56
Table Library Financing Matrix ............................ 63
Table Encina WPCF Capacity Analysis ....................... 64
Map Park Districts ..................................... 75
Map Major Drainage Facilities ............................ 79
89
113
iv October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit # Page #
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Map Existing Major Sewer Facilities ....................... 132
Table Zone 13 Yearly Sewer Demand ....................... 135
Table Equivalent Dwelling Units for Zone13 .................. 136
Map EDU per Land Use ............................... 138
Table Sewer Financing Matrix ............................ 141
Map Water District Boundaries ........................... 144
Map Potable Water System ............................. 147
Map Reclaimed Water System ....... ................... 148
Table Water Financing Matrix ............................ 158
Map Finance Area Boundaries ........................... 164
Table Finance Summary Matrix ........................... 165
Zone 13 LFMP V October 1995
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this document is to provide a plan fx supplying the public facilities that
will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 13 area of the City of
Carlsbad, as shown in Exhibit 1 on page 2. The plan has been prepared in accordance
with the City's Growth Management Program, as outlined in Chapter 21.90 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 1986.'
This document is the second amendment to the original Zone 13 Local Facilities
Management Plan (LFMP), adopted June 6, 1992 and amended March 16, 1993 by the
City of Carlsbad. This document supersedes the previously approved plans. The purpose
of this amendment is to reflect proposed refinements in land use and adjustments to the
Zone 13 boundary. The boundary adjustment incorporates an area which was formerly
within Zone 5. As a result of the more detailed land use information, the public facility
requirements and timing for Zone 13 have been refined. These changes do not result in
any significant changes in public facilities requirements.
Development Assumptions
The first step in developing such a plan is to estimate the amount of development, both
residential and nonresidential, that will be allowed in the zone. All development within
Zone 13 will be nonresidential. The types of land uses assumed for the zone are consistent
with the Carlsbad General Plan. In addition, a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan
207(A) are being prepared concurrently with this LFMP, addressing the major portion of
Zone 13. The Specific Plan land use descriptions are more detailed, and they have been
used to analyze facility needs for the area covered by Specific Plan 207(A). These land use
assumptions are discussed and their location is shown in the introductory chapter of this
plan.
To estimate the amount of development that could occur within Zone 13, a density yield
factor is applied to all vacant, developable land. Developable acreage is determined by
deducting the following constrained lands from the gross acreage of the zone:
Major (2 69 kv) power-line easements
Future Right-of-way for Circulation Element Roads
Railroad Right-of-way
Slopes Greater Than 40%
Riparian Woodland
Wetlands
Floodways
Permanent Bodies of Water
Other Environmental Features
' The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-23-86 (CC Resolution No. 8797).
Zone 13 WIMP 1 October 1995
Oceanside
Vista 4
I LEGEND I Encindas
Ky Zone 13
lr'] Existing Roadways I:] Proposed Roadways . . . . .**
Zone Boundaries
Hofman Planning
Associates
Zone 13 - Location Map
EXHIBIT 1
2
For nonresidential development, it is typically assumed that building coverage would be
30% of the net developable acreage. This method yields an ultimate nonresidential
development estimate of 4,214,691 square feet. Given the large amount of unconstrained
acreage in Zone 13 (approximately 531' net acres) and the limitations of the surrounding
circulation network, a lower overall building coverage assumption of 20% was used for
Zone 13. This lower coverage results in a more realistic estimate of 3,398,430 square
feet. These assumptions are used for facility planning purposes only. Future development
will likely yield more than these assumptions over a given area and less than these
assumptions in others, however, future development applications must demonstrate that
the facility impacts generated by the proposed development do not exceed the overall build
out projections and facility impacts reflected in this zone plan.
The plan includes phasing schedules which estimate the property owners' proposed amount
of development for each year from 1995 to 2019. The property owners are not required
to adhere to this phasing, and it is intended for facility planning purposes only. The
phasing schedules, (Exhibits 13-17), also include the projections for other zones with
adopted Local Facilities Management Plans. The schedules are used to determine
approximate threshold years for constructing or upgrading various public facilities to
maintain compliance with the Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program.
The threshold years arrived at in this way are only projections for facility planning
purposes. The actual thresholds must be monitored as development takes place in this
zone. Facilities may be needed sooner or later than the threshold years shown in this plan,
depending upon the actual timing of development.
Zone 13 Requirements for Public Facilities
The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the demand for public
facilities generated by development in Zone 13 based on the eleven adopted Performance
Standards in the Growth Management Program. Exhibit 2 on page 5 shows the current
status of each facility with respect to the Performance Standard, given the existing amount
of development in the zone. Because there is currently a limited amount of developed land
in Zone 13 the public facility demands are presently minimal and all eleven Performance
Standards are currently being met. Exhibit 3 on page 6 provides a summary of public
facilities adequacy through build out for Zone 13.
In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as development occurs in
the zone, the Plan contains specific conditions of approval which are listed in the following
exhibits. Exhibit 4 on page 7 contains the General Conditions which are applicable to all
zones of the City. Exhibit 5 on page 9 contains Special Conditions for Zone 13. The
Special Conditions state each facility which must be provided, whether it must be financed
or constructed, and when it must be provided.
2From Exhibit 10 on page 28
3 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
The following list indicates the public facilities required to serve the nonresidential
development in Zone 13. This chart shows whether the facility would otherwise be
provided as a condition of approval of a development project or whether a special funding
mechanism is needed.
City Administration
Libraries
Wastewater Treatment
Capacity:
Park Facilities:
Drainage Facilities:
Circulation Facilities:
Fire Facilities:
Open Space Facilities:
Schools:
Sewer Collection System:
Water Distribution System:
Funding provided by Community Facilities District (CFD) No. I
Funding provided by CFD No. 1
Funding provided by sewer connection fees.
Funding mechanism is required. As non-residential development in
Zone 13 occurs. prior to issuance of a building permit, a growth
management fee of 4OC per square foot park impact fee will be collected.
The City will use this fee to construct recreational facilities within the
industrial corridor of the City to offset demand created by employees
within Zone 13.
Condition of approval of development project and CFD No. 3.
Combination of condition of approval of development projects and
special funding, including CFD No. 1, CFD No. 3, and Cannon Road
West Fee Program.
No special funding required.
No special funding required.
Funding provided by school fees
Condition of approval of development project and CFD No. 3.
Condition of approval of development project and CFD No. 3.
Ocrobet 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 4
EXHIBIT 2
Zone 13 Existing Public Facilities Summary
LFMP 87-13(B)
Facility Conformance with adopted Performance Standard
Citywide:
City Administrative Facilities
Library
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Park District #1:
Parks Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
, performance standard.
Zone 13:
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Collection System
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard. '
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard.
Zone 13 LFMP 5 October 1995
EXHIBIT 3
Zone 13 Build Out Public Facilities Summary
LFMP 87-13(C)
Facility Conformance with adopted Performance Standard
City Administrative
Library
Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted
performance standard through build out.
Existing and planned facilities meet the adopted
performance standard through bclild out.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Existing and planned facilities meet
the adopted performance standard through buildout.
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Water Distribution
Park facilities meet the adopted performance standard
with proposed mitigation through build out.
Drainage facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Circulation facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Existing fire facilities meet the adopted performance
standard through build out.
Existing and proposed open space meets the adopted
performance standard through build out.
School facilities will meet the adopted performance with
mitigation through build out.
Sewer collection facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Water distribution facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures through
build out.
Zone 13 LJMP 6 October 1995
EXHIBIT 4
General Conditions for Zone 13
LFMP 87-13(B)
1. All development within Zone 13 shall conform with the provisions of Section
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this
Local Facilities Management Plan.
2. All development within Zone 13 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee
pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, and as
amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 13
shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan
that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance
standards.
3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 13 pursuant to Subsections
21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 13 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide
Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on
September 23, 1986.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan is
anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade
standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment
to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council
or property owners at any time.
6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted
performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the
matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council
determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or
development permits which would impact the facility shall be issued unless an
amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone is approved by the City Council
which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities into
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be
allowed unless the performance standards are complied with.
8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projects
within Zone 13. All future projects within Zone 13 shall undergo environmental
review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures
7 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their
entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council.
9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects
within Zone 13. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
10. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 13 shall be contingent upon the
provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan. At this time a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District has been
formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve
new development. If Zone 13 properties are not participants within that district,
the required General Plan Consistency finding cannot be made. Therefore. no
discretionary approvals, Building Permits, Grading Permits, Final Maps, or
development permits will be issued or approved unless the subject property
annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provided by the
developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally
applicable to Zone 13 that are included in the Community Facilities District. The
following activities are exempt from this: grading, minor planning entitlements or
minor construction as part of ongoing agricultural operations, minor subdivisions
and lot line adjustments for financing purposes or a Planned Community Master
Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely at the City's discretion.
Zone 13 LFMP 8 October 1995
EXHIBITS .
Special Conditions For Zone 13
LFMP 87-13(B)
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 13 and must
be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 13. These conditions are
also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility.
City Admtrati ve F- .. ...
No special conditions.
No special conditions.
Wastewater Treatment Ce
The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure
adequate wastewater treatment capacity through buildout:
A. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine
actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems.
Parks
A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-residential
development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will
be used to construct recreational facilities to offset the demand created by
employees within Zone 13.
A. All future development in Zone 13 will be required to construct any future Zone
13 storm drain facilities identified in the adopted Drainage Master Plan or
acceptable alternate facilities, as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities
necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the
recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for
any development requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 13.
B. Prior to the recordation of any 'final map, issuance of grading permit or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any specific watershed within Zone 13, the
developers of that project are required to:
Zone 13 LFMP 9 October 1995
C.
D.
Circulation
A.
B.
1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the adopted Drainage
Master Plan
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within the Agua Hedionda Creek
Watershed (Watershed B) of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required
to financially guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or
alternative facilities deemed acceptable by the City Engineer:
1. 5 1 'I storm drain; the double 60-inch storm drain and channel grading;
collectively referred to as line BAA
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within the Canyon de las Encinas
Watershed (Watershed C) of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required
to financially guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or
alternative facilities deemed acceptable by the City Engineer:
1. 42" - 48" storm drain line CB
2. 42" - 51" storm drain line CC
A portion of Zone 13 is included in the proposed Cannon Road (west) Fee
Program. That portion required to participate in the proposed fee program is
identified in the fee study dated August '1994 contained in Appendix A-5. Prior to
issuance of a building permit for any project required to participate in fee program,
the applicant shall pay the fee as determined for that project in the Cannon Road
West Fee Program.
The following improvements are anticipated to be required during the build out of
Zone 13. Prior to development within each of the identified General Plan land use
sub-areas, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, the construction of the
following circulation improvements shall be financially guaranteed, as set forth in
the finance chapter of this plan:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED NOW
a. n Road/I-5 Nortl~hwAmd Southboundhmps
Install traffic signals. Also, at the Southbound Ramps widen the ramps and
add a southbound left-turn lane. Restripe the westbound through lane for
an additional left-turn lane.
Zone 13 WIMP 10 October 1995
ed Cost - $232,000
2.
The 1-5 Ramps at Cannon Road are not within the City of Carlsbad's
jurisdiction, however, Carlsbad's adopted Capital Improvement Program
has scheduled TIF and PFF funds for the City's share of the improvements
to the ramps. The timing for these improvements is controlled by
CalTrans, the responsible jurisdiction for completing the work. This
dedication of funds guaranteed the specific improvement needed to bring
this intersection into conformance with the City's adopted Performance
standard. For these reasons, no further action is required prior to
development within Zone 13.
INTERIM YEAR IMPROVEMENTS
a. ad from 1-5 to Car Couw Drive
Add an additional westbound through lane for a total of three westbound
lanes.
- $150,000
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3, O/PI-1, 0-PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
b. fi
Construction of Cannon Road to two lanes in each direction.
ed Cost - $8,467,000
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3; O/PI-1, or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall
11 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
C. Armada D rive/Leeo Drive from Canno n Road to Pa lomar A irport Road
Construction of Armada Drivekgo Drive to two lanes in each direction.
Estimated Cost - $2,573,000
Timirg:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-2, TR-3,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2, TR/C or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines
that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
d. : / - Install Traffic Signal. Also, provide an
exclusive left-turn lane and a shared throughhight-turn lane in the
southbound direction. In the northbound direction, add a left-turn lane and
restripe the exclusive right-turn lane for a shared throughkight-turn lane.
Also, add an eastbound left-turn lane and westbound shared through/right-
turn lane.
ted Cost - $169,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1, OIPI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
e. Drive/C- - Install Traffic Signal. Provide an
exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes in the westbound direction.
In the northbound direction, add an exclusive right-turn lane.
d Cost - $1 10,OOO
Zone 13 LFMP 12 October 1995
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit. whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR- 1, TR-2.
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
f. Paseo del Norte /Palomar mort Road - Provide a westbound exclusive
right-turn lane.
Estimed Cos? - $185,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3,0/PI-2,
TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
g. Le20 Dr ive/Cannon Road - Install traffic signal. Provide two left-turn lanes
and an exclusive right-turn lane in the northbound direction; two through
lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane in the eastbound direction; and two
left-turn lanes and two through lanes in the westbound direction. .
ted Cost - $5,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3, O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
'
h. da Dri ve/Palowort Road - Install traffic signal modifications
as necessary. Restripe the northbound approach for two left-turn lanes and
a shared througwright-turn lane. In the southbound direction, provide two
Zone 13 LFMP 13 October 1995
left-turn lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and an exclusive right-
turn lane. Also, add an eastbound left-turn lane and a westbound exclusive
right-turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $205,000
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea O/PI-2, TR-3
or TWC of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this improvement
is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its
construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
1. Hidden Valley Road /Palm Aimort Road - Construction of intersection
to include two through lanes, one shared righthhrough lane and one left
turn lane in the eastbound and westbound directions. Provide one shared
southbound left/right/through lane. Provide a shared right-turnlthrough
lane and one left-turn lane in the northbound direction.
ted Cost - $155,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit. whichever occurs first for any project within subarea O/PI-2, TR-3
or TWC of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this improvement
is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its
construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
j,. One of the following two groups of improvements dependent upon whether
Cannon Road is constructed between Zone 13 and El Camino Real:
Cow if Cannon Road is not Extended: ..
1. ort Road/I-5 Northbound €bu&~ - Restripe the
westbound Palomar Airport Road approach for the following: two
through lanes, one shared throughlright-turn lane, and one exclusive
right-turn lane.
d Cost - $1,725
October 1995 Zone 13 w;MP 14
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea O/PI-2. TR-3, TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
.. 11. College Boule vard/Palomar Aimort - Provide two left-turn
lanes, one through lane, and one shared throughhight-turn lane in
the northbound direction, Restripe the southbound College
Boulevard approach for the following: one left-turn lane, one
shared throughkight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $1,150
Prior to recordation of .a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR- 1, TR-2, TR-3,0/PI- 1 , O/PI-2. TWC or R of Zone 13,
if the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary
to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
n Road IS Extended:
1. - Widen the northbound on
ramps and restripe the westbound Cannon Road approach to provide
one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one
exclusive right-turn lane.
ed Cost - $1,150
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City
Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain
the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 15
.. 11. Palomar Airport Road /I-5 Northbound Ram - Restripe the
westbound Palomar Airport Road approach to provide two through
lanes, one shared throughiright-turn lane, and one exclusive right
turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $1,725
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-3, O/PI-2, TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
iii. e Boule v&/Palomar Aimort && - Provide two left-turn
lanes, one through lane, and one shared throughlright lane in the
northbound direction. Restripe the southbound approach for a left-
turn lane, a through lane and a shared throughhight-turn lane
- $1,150
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-3, O/PI-2, TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
iv . in0 Red
Construction of Cannon Road to two lanes in each direction.
-$3,247,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, TR-3, O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the
16 October I995 Zone 13 LFMP
3.
City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to
maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
V. El Cam' ino Real /Cannon Road - Provide three through lanes, one
exclusive right-turn, and two exclusive left-turn lanes in the
southbound direction. Provide two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and two exclusive left-turn lanes in the
northbound direction. In the eastbound direction, provide one
through lane, one shared througwright-turn lane and two exclusive
left-turn lanes. In the westbound direction, provide one through
lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and two exclusive left-turn
lanes. Install a traffic signal.
Estimated Cost - $340,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, TR-3, O/PI-l or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the
City Engineer determines that this improvement is 'necessary to
maintain the Growth Management .Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
IMPROVEMENT NEEDED BY BUILD OUT
a. orthbound - Restripe the westbound Cannon
Road approach to provide one through lane, one shared throughkight-turn
lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, widen the on ramp and
provide an additional eastbound Cannon Road left-turn lane. Also, widen
the off ramp and add a northbound exclusive right-turn lane.
ed Cost - $4,600
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Zone 13 LFMP 17 October 1995
b. Palomar A irport/I-5 Northbound Ramps - Restripe the westbound approach
for two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane and one exclusive
right turn.
Estimated Cost - $1,725
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3, O/PI-2,
TR/C or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
C. Paseo del Norte /- - Construction of an additional eastbound
left-turn lane for a total of two exclusive left-turn lanes, one through lane,
and one throughiright-turn lane. In addition, at a point east of the
intersection, an additional westbound Cannon Road through lane would be
required. At the intersection, this would result in the following lane
configuration in the westbound direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and a shared throughhight-turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $27,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea' TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-l, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
d. Paseo del Norte/P- Airport Road - Restripe the northbound and
southbound Paseo del Norte approaches to provide two exclusive left-turn
lanes, one shared throughlright-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
Provide an eastbound exclusive right-turn lane.
ted Cost - $2,300
Zone 13 LFMP 18 October 1995
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3, O/PI-2.
TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
e. no Real/CannM Road - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real
approach to provide for two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, one shared
throughhight turn lane, and on exclusive right-turn lane. In addition,
provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound Cannon Road
approach. [Note: Improvements listed in condition 2.i.v (Cannon Road
extended), may be built prior to the above improvements. If they are not
built, they must be constructed with the above improvements.)
ed Cost - $6.325
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
f. ary to El Camino Rstarl
Construction of Cannon Road to full major arterial standards from the
eastern Zone boundary to El Camino Real.
d Cw - $3,247,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Zone 13 LFMP 19 October 1995
No special conditions.
4EJmax
No special conditions.
Schools
No special conditions.
Sewer Collection Svstem
A. ALL WATERSHEDS
All development within Zone 13 will be required to pay the appropriate sewer
connection fee prior to issuance of any building permit.
B. Basin A
Basin A is located within the South Agua Hedionda sewer drainage basin. No
improvements are required to this system for Zone 13, other than the extension of
the 10" sewer pipeline in Cannon Road.
C. Basin B
Basin B is located within the Buena/Vallecitos Interceptor sewer drainage basin.
No improvements are required to this system for Zone 13.
.. . Water Distribution Svstem
A. All future development in Zone 13 shall pay a major facilities fee based on EDU's
to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District and a capacity charge to the San Diego
County Water Authority. In addition, all development in Zone 13 shall be required
to provide any water reclamation facilities identified in the Water Reclamation
Master Plan as determined by the District Engineer. Any water reclamation
facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior
to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit,
whichever occurs first. These guarantees shall be based upon the requirements for
the service area within which the proposed development is located to the extent that
the demand is created by future development.
Zone 13 LFMP 20 October 1995
B. Service Area A
Water facilities will be provided at the time of development within Service Area
A, to the satisfaction of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The proposed minimum 12-inch diameter water pipeline in future
Cannon Road.
The proposed pressure regulating station in Cannon Road east of
Car Country Drive.
The proposed 8-inch reclaimed water lines in future Armada Drive
and future Leg0 Drive.
The proposed 16-inch water main in future Armada Drive.
The proposed 10-inch water main in future Leg0 Drive.
The proposed 12-inch water main extending from Hidden Valley
Road to Cannon Road.
The proposed minimum 8-inch water main in future D Street.
C. Service Area B
The following water facilities will be required as a condition to the approval of
future development within Service Area B to the satisfaction of CMWD.
1. The proposed relocation of the existing 16-inch water line from
existing reservoir to the existing 16-inch water line in Palomar
Airport Road.
2. The proposed 16-inch water line in future Armada Drive
3.
Financing for Facilities
The proposed 8 -inch reclaimed water lines in future Armada Drive,
future Leg0 Drive and Paseo Del None.
Financing of the above listed facilities are discussed at length in the Finance Chapter of this
document.
Zone 13 MMP 21 October 1995
11. INTRODUCTION
This Local Facilities Management Plan [LFMP 87-13(B)] completes the second phase of
Carlsbad's overall Growth Management Program for Zone 13. Phase One of the Growth
Management Program was completed with the adoption of the 1986 Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan (CFIP 86). For purposes of public facilities analysis, the '86 CFIP separated
the City into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones as shown on Exhibit 1 on page 2.
A. PLAN OVERVIEW
follows:
1-
I1 -
I11 -
IV -
v-
VI -
VI1 -
This LFMP provides a detailed description and analysis of how facilities will be provided
in Zone 13 from now until build out of the zone. The plan is divided into seven parts as
Executive Summary: Summarizes the plan and highlights all conditions
proposed by the plan.
Introduction: Provides an introduction to the format and content of the
plan.
Build Out Projections: Projects the ultimate amount of development in
Zone 13, along with itemizing existing, developing, and future land uses.
Phasing: Attempts to project how and when development will be phased in
Zone 13.
Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements: Provides a complete description
and analysis of when and how each facility will be provided and financed
based on build out projections and phasing assumptions.
Finance: Provides a summary of the financial alternatives available to fund
each facility and a discussion of the LFMP's impact on City finances.
Appendices: Provides the technical materials used in preparation of this
plan.
The most detailed part of the plan is Part V. This part is divided into eleven separate
sections, one for each facility. Each section provides a detailed analysis of the facility.
Each facility section will contain adequacy findings. Adequacy findings summarize
whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. If a
facility does not conform with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion
describing this situation, a description of mitigation or alternatives, and a financing
discussion.
Zone 13 LFMP 22 October 1995
B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 13
Management Zone 13 is located within the northwest quadrant of the City of Carlsbad as
shown on Exhibit 1 on page 2. The zone is bounded generally by Agua Hedionda Lagoon
on the north, Palomar Airport Road to the south, the Car Country mall and Paseo Del
Norte to the west and Macario Canyon and Hidden Valley Road to the east.
Zone 13 is one of six management zones in the northwest quadrant of the City. The zones
which comprise this quadrant are also shown in Exhibit 1 on page 2.
Exhibit 6 on page 24 identifies property ownership in Zone 13 by Assessor Parcel Number
and the respective acreage. These acreages were provided by the San Diego County
Assessors Office and differ slightly from the environmental constraints analysis shown on
Exhibit 9 on page 28.'
Concurrent with the adoption of this LFMP amendment, a General Plan amendment and
a Specific Plan amendment are being approved for a majority of the Zone 13 properties.
These Carlsbad General Plan designations, as shown on Exhibit 7, page 25 specify five
land uses within Zone 13: Regional Retail (R), TraveVRecreation Commercial (TR),
TraveVRecreation Commercial/Community Commercial(TR/C) , Office/Planned Industrial
(O/PI), and Open Space (OS). For the purpose of analyzing public facility requirements
for Zone 13, specific land use assumptions as stated in SP 207(A) were utilized for the
amount and type of future development within the specific plan area. These uses are
described in detail in the build out projections chapter of this plan.
As discussed on page 1 of this document, with this amendment to the Zone 13 LFMP. an
adjustment .is being made to the eastern zone boundary. The boundary adjustment
incorporates an area which was formerly within Zone 5 (see parcel 212-041-05 on Exhibit
6 on page 24.)
The Carlsbad Land Use Zoning within Zone 13 is shown on Exhibit 8.
' The gross acreage calculations per sub-area shown on Exhibit 10 may differ
slightly from those shown per parcel on Exhibit 6. This is because the acreage on
Exhibit 6 is taken from assessor parcel maps whereas the acreage on Exhibit 10
was determined by planimeter measurement at 200' scale accuracy.
23 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
10.00 1.84
56.50 23.27
TR-3 14.82 13.01
5.84 5.84 I
SDGE 21 2-010-14 OS-1
Ecke, Paul Sr. TR 212-0414J5, TR-2
f-
Note: This analysis was based on Assessor's Parcel information.
This information is a different level of detail than found on the
constraints analysis or the tentative maps associated with
SP 207 (A), therefore acreage totals will not match.
SDGE' = San Diego Gas and Electric
CRC = Carisbad Ranch Company
GIA' = Gemological Institute of America
NAMM = National Association of Music Merchants
(1) BecauSe SDGE is not a part of SP 207 (A), this area's analysis
was not revised at this time. This area will be subject to further
analytis when SDGE submits improvement plans.
Zone 13 - Property Ownership
EXHIBIT6
24
LEGEND
SDGE - San Diego Gas and Electric
CRC - Carlsbad Ranch Company
GIA - Gemological Institute of America
NAMM - National Association of Music Merchants
.\ --Jr
Hofman Planning
-AS s o c i ate s
I
Agua Hedionda
Palomar Airport Road
LEGEND
[Rl Regional Retail kl Openspace
[TRICI TravellRecreation Commercial/Comrnunity
Office/Planned Industrial
1;n-n
No XAU NOTE ML LOCATIONSAWROIIWTE kl Travel/Recreation Commercial
Zone 13 - General Plan
EXHIBIT 7 Hofman Planning
Associates
25
Agua Hedionda
LEGEND
I p-u I Public Utility
I c-T I Commercial Tourist
Palomar Airport Road
I P-M I Planned Industrial
~~~~ ~~ p] General Commercial
I Q I Qualified Development Overlay .," .. NO SCALE WTE *LL LOCATIONS APPROIIWIE
4 Hofman Planning 4 P ~ssociates
Zone 13 - Zoning
EXHIBIT 8
26
111. BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS
To properly assess and plan for facilities to serve Zone 13 ,it is necessary to project the type and
intensity of land use as the zone builds out. These build out projections define land use intensity
and corresponding facilities demands. Build out projections are based on the existing Carlsbad
General Plan as amended concurrent with this Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan SP 207(A).
As discussed in the Executive Summary, for the purpose of preparing this Local Facilities
Management Plan. a reasonable non-residential land use mix consistent with the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan (SP 207(A)) was used for analyzing the public facility impacts generated by
development in this zone through build out. This specific land use mix is clearly defined in
Exhibit 12 on page 34, and is used consistently throughout this document. This reduced amount
of development more accurately reflects the type and amount of development that is compatible
with the surrounding area. Actual development may vary from these projection, however, future
development applications must demonstrate that the facility impacts generated by the proposed
development do not exceed the overall build out projections and facility impacts reflected in this
zone plan.
The methodology used in compiling the build out projections is consistent with that used in the
1986 CFIP. The methodology is briefly described as follows:
A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
General Plan Land Use Designations were plotted on a 1 I' = 200' base map. A reduction
of this map is shown on Exhibit 9 on page 28. These designations were divided into sub-
areas to aid in facility analysis. The gross acreage of each sub-area was determined by
planimeter measurement. Exhibit 10 on page 29 summarizes the acreage calculations for
the existing General Plan.'
' The gross acreage calculations per sub-area shown on Exhibit 10 may differ
slightly from those shown per parcel on Exhibit 6. This is because the acreage on
Exhibit 6 is taken from assessor parcel maps whereas the acreage on Exhibit 10
was determined by planimeter measurement at 200' scale accuracy. It should also
be noted that the gross and net acreages contained in this LFMP are not the same
as those in SP 207(A) or as cited in subsequent tentative maps because of
differences in the geographical areas and in areas considered constrained, such as
streets .
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 27
Zone 13 Constraints EXHIBIT9
28 ..’
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
TR-1 14)
TR-2
TU-3
OIPI-1
OIPI-2
TRIC
R
os-1
os-2
OS-3
OS-4
OS-5
EXHIBIT 10
Contraints Analysis (as of 1/1195)13l
Full Constraints (1) Gross
10.001 3.15
53.75
133.63
32.42
46.51
12.20
26.65
47.24
55.63
29.37
NOTES:
(1 CONSTRAINTS
A - Major Powerline Easement
B - Circulation
C - Railroad ROW
D - Slopes > 40%
1.97
23.78
D
2.47
0.22
4.34
0.12
0.08
15.13
0.70
2.09
5.01
30.16
E - Riparian
F - Wetlands
G - Floodplain
E -
0.32
- 0.32 -
I - Other Envir. Feature
J - Slopes 25% to 40%
K ~ School Site Overlay
H - Permanent Body of Water
(2) Slope areas of 25% to 40% are constrained for residential uses only.
(3) The acreages by subarea shown in this table may vary from those shown in SP 207 (A) or on
subsequent tentative maps due to differences in geographic areas and in constraints considered,
such as streets other than General Plan Circulation Element roadways.
(4) Because SDGE IS not a part of SP 207 (A), this area's analysts was not revised at this time.
This area will be sublect to further analysis when SDGE submits improvement plans.
r Developable
53.53
125.67
28.81
41.90
10.48
26.65
83.33
44.91
51.33
27.40
Zone 13 LFMP 29 October 1995
B. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
Consistent with adopted City policies and ordinances, development constraints within each
sub-area were identified5. Constraints that may have existed on land that is developed or
has land use approvals were not included in this analysis. Constraints fall into two basic
categories: 1) full and 2) partial. Fully constrained areas cannot be used to calculate
density and are considered undevelopable. Fifty percent of partially constrained residential
areas can be used in residential density calculations; however, 100% credit is given to non-
residential development. As Zone 13 is completely non-residential, only fully constrained
areas were excluded when calculating future development. Since fully constrained areas
may overlap each other, for accounting purposes, constraints are organized in a hierarchy
beginning with 'A' - major powerline easements and ending with 'J' - slopes between 25% - 40%. When this occurs, only the area of the highest level constraint is calculated for
build out projection purposes. It is recognized that underlying constraints exist and that
these constraints as well as others will be defined by specific environmental review for
individual development projects.
Full developmental constraints are as follows:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Major (2 69 kv) power-line easements
Proposed circulation element roadways
Railroad track beds or R-0-W
Slopes of 40% or more in grade
Significant riparian, or woodland habitats
Significant wetlands
Floodways
Permanent bodies of water
Other significant environmental features as determined by the Environmental
Review process.
Partial Developmental Constraints include:
J. Slopes between 2540% in grade: only 1/2 of the area within slopes between 25-
40% in grade can be used in residential density calculations. Slopes between 25-
40% in grade are not constrained for nonresidential density calculations.
Also included in the constraints analysis is the programming of
K. Planned school facilities
The acreages by subarea shown in this table may vary from those shown in SP 207
(A) or on subsequent tentative maps due to differences in geographic areas and in
constraints considered, such as streets other than General Plan Circulation Element
roadways.
5
30 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
The approximate area and location of school facilities are indicated in the General Plan.
The beneficial and efficient provision of these facilities require a minimum area of land
free of development constraints. Consistent with City and school district policy, the
minimum acreage identified by the General Plan for school facilities was subtracted from
the developable acreage in the applicable sub-area's residential density calculations.
There are no designated school sites located within Zone 13 boundaries.
C. EXISTING LAND USE
Existing land uses within each sub-area as of 1/1/95 were identified. All land within Zone
13 is either in active agricultural use, open space, or vacant Office/Planned Industrial,
Community Commercial/Office/P1anned Industrial, Community Commercial,
TraveVRecreation Commercial or in an Unplanned Area. Concurrent with, this Local
Facilities Management Plan Amendment, a General Plan Amendment is being processed,
which will revise these land use designations. The analyses contained in the Local
Facilities Management Plan Amendment assumes the revised land uses identified in the
General Plan Amendment are existing. These land uses are Regional Retail,
Office/Planned Industrial, Travel/Recreation Commercial, TraveVRecreation
CommerciaVCommunity Commercial or Open Space.
D. DEVELOPING LAND USE
Developing land use is a category which defines the status or stage of a land use proposal
or project in the development process. The development process begins when a
development application is submitted to the City. Various procedures are followed
depending on the type of application submitted. In all cases. applications are reviewed to
ensure that all City standards are met and there is conformance with all previous
discretionary approvals prior to finalizing the projects and issuing building permits. Once
a project has received final occupancy, the development process ends, and the land use is
identified as an existing land use.
E. NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTION CALCULATIONS
Previous zone plans calculated build out square footage by multiplying net-developable
acreage of each non-residential land use sub-area by either a factor of 0.3 or 0.4. The
Growth Management Program uses the 0.3 factor to estimate building square footage
yields on either 1) unapproved and unimproved vacant, unconstrained land or on 2)
urbanized, underdeveloped, non-residential sites. The 0.4 factor is used to estimate
building square footage yields on unconstrained lots which have approved land use projects
and have all infrastructure in. place.
When the 0.3 factor was applied to the net developable acreage in Zone 13 the resulting
development, as identified in Exhibit 11 on page 33, could not be adequately
accommodated by future public facilities (specifically circulation). Therefore, more
Zone 13 WMP 31 October 1995
specific land use assumptions were used which results in a lower overall coverage factor,
as shown in Exhibit 12 on page 34. These assumptions are used for facility planning
purposes only. Future development will likely yield more than these assumptions over a
given area and less than these assumptions in others, however, future development
applications must demonstrate that the facility impacts generated by the proposed
development do not exceed the overall build out projections and facility impacts reflected
in this zone plan.
F. BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTION
There is no residentially designated land within Zone 13, therefore no population is
projected.
Zone 13 LFMP 32 October 1995
EXHIBIT 11
General Plan Land Use Build Out Projections Based on 30% Yield
(As of 1/1/95)fl)
General Plan
Land Use
Desi nation 1-
TR-2
TR-3
OIPI-1
O/PI-2
TR/C
R ..
TOTAL
Developable
53.53
125.67
28.81
41.90
10.48
26.65
General Plan
Build Out
Projections
in Acres
10.64
16.06
37.70
8.64
12.57
3.14
8 .OO
96.76
General Plan
Build Out
Projections
in-Sq.Ft.
463,653
699,530
1,642,256
376,489
547,549
136,953
348,262
4,214,691
(1) The acreages by subarea shown in this table may vary from those
shown in SP 207 (A) or on subsequent tentative maps due to
differences in geographic areas and in constraints considered,
such as streets other than General Plan Circulation Element roadways.
(4) Because SDGE is not a part of SP 207 (A), this area's analysis was not revised at this time.
This area will be subject to further analysis when SDGE submits improvement plans.
Zone 13 LFMP 33 October 1995
Exhibit 12
Build Out Projections Based on Specific Land Use Mix and Modified Yield
(As of 1 /I /95)( 1)
26.65
394.83
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
rR-i (2)
TR-2
Subtotal
TR-3
3/PL 1
Subtotal
3/PI-2
Subtotal
rR/c
Subtotal
3 0.2( I 0.2(
Projected
Land Use
Mix
rravel/Recreational Commercial
lesort
Hotel Suites
Retail
Conference Facilities
Meeting/Ballrooms
Restaurant
Golf Course (3)
Restaurant in Club House
:amily Park
;emological Institute
Office/R&D/Lab
Light Manufacturing
Warehouse
Vocational School/Library
Cafeteria/Museum/Auditoriun
lffice
qesearch and Development
iotel
qetail
Specialty Retail
TOTAL
Net
Developable
Acres
35.48
125.84
125.67
28.81
41.90
10.4E
Modified
.U Intensity
Estimate
0.30
0.1 1
O.OE
0.4L
0.4d
0.4(
Build Out
'rojections
in Acres
10.64
14.85
9.77
12.6:
18.3;
4.8;
6.8!
78.0:
Build Out
Projections
in Sq. Ft.
463,600
576,000
6,000
16,000
24,000
19,000
0
6,000
647,000
425,750
414,600
38.600
40,000
550,000
300,000
500,000
800,OOC
192.08C
20,ooc
2 1 2,08C
300,OOC
3,398,43C
18,300
38,500
(1 1 The acreages by subarea shown in this table may vary from those shown in SP 207 (A) or on
subsequent tentative maps due to differences in geographic areas and in constraints considered,
such as streets other than General Plan Circulation Element roadways.
(2) Because SDGE is not a part of SP 207 (A), this area's analysis was not revised at this time.
This area will be subject to further analysis when SDGE submits improvement plans.
(3) Golf course acreage included in total for this subarea. Golf course includes acreage for OS-2, 4.
Zone 13 LFMP 34 October 1995
IV. PHASING PROJECTIONS
Phasing projections estimate when, where and how much development will occur in Zone 13
between now and build out. Although difficult to predict exactly, phasing projections begin to
make possible advance planning and programming of public facilities to assure adopted
performance standards are continually met. Specifically, phasing projections:
1. Project estimated demands for public facilities on a yearly basis until build out.
2. Project and establish thresholds which indicate when and where public facilities
improvements are needed.
3. By projecting facility thresholds, allow sufficient lead time for facility programming to
assure performance standards are continually met.
4. Through threshold identification. allow the City to implement public facility
improvements.
Citywide residential phasing is included here for analysis of facilities that are based on residential
development. However, the analysis of City Administrative, Library, Park. and School Facilities
is provided for informative purposes only, as the performance standards do not apply to non-
residential development.
A. ZONE 13 LAND USE PHASING
1. Residential
The projected residential phasing schedule is intended to be used for projecting
future need and timing of public facilities. It is a tool to allow the city to anticipate
future public facility needs and to budget monies for their improvement. The
projected residential phasing schedule is not absolute.
There is no residential development either existing or planned within Zone 13.
Exhibit 13 on page 36 shows the latest yearly residential phasing schedules of the
adopted LFMP's as updated by city staff. The adopted LFMP's include Zones 1-9,
11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 24.
Exhibit 14 on page 39 shows a 'similar phasing schedule for the zones located
within the northwest quadrant of the City. The northwest quadrant phasing
projections are provided to make the review and future update and monitoring of
quadrant specific facilities more manageable and easier to understand.
35 October 1995 Zone I3 LFMP
EXHIBIT 13
YEARS
as of 1/1
1995
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
200 1
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
201 0
201 1
201 2
201 3
201 4
201 5
201 6
201 7
201 8
201 9
TOTAL
CITY WIDE RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(1 1 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 10,277 2.488 235 3,065 0 7,992 1,101 1
31 0 0 0 0 56 0 0
21 0 0 0 0 53 0 0
31 0 0 0 0 53 50 0
50 0 0 0 0 53 50 0
50 5 1 0 0 53 50 0
50 5 1 0 0 53 50 3
90 5 1 0 0 53 50 3
90 5 1 0 0 53 71 3
90 5 1 0 0 53 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 53 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 53 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 73 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 71
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 72
90 5 1 0 0 81 71 72
90 5 1 0 0 0 70 79
90 5 1 0 0 0 60 72
90 5 0 0 0 0 0 72
90 0 0 0 0 0 0 74
90 0 0 0 0 0 0 74
90 0 0 0 0 0 0 7;
12,220 2,578 252 3,065 0 9,218 2,333 1,225
* FORFACILITY PLANNING PURPOSESONLY * *
STATUS
Existinc
'rojectec
3uild Oul
I
Notes
NOTES: (1 1 Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221.
(2) Zone 2 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 91 23.
(3) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9084.
(4) Zone 4 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 91 22.
(5) Zone 5 LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, C.C Reso. No. 9188.
(6) Zone 6 LFMP, adopted November 10, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9291.
(7) Zone 7 LFMP, adopted December 5, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-424.
(8) Zone 8 LFMP, adopted February 7, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-33.
Zone I3 L FMP 36 October I995
EXHIBIT 13 (page 2 of 3)
As of 1/1
1995
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
201 1
201 2
201 3
2014
201 5
201 6
201 7
201 8
201 9
TOTAL
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
(9) (10) (1 1) (1 2) (1 3) (141 (1 5) (16)
459 0 1,058 589 0 2 520 0 0 1
16 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
16
16
16
20
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
0
0
0
0
0
0 87
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 131
0 1 40
0 194
0 194
0 194
48 194
80 194
170 0
170 0
170 0
170 0
170 0
170 0
170 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
48
120
120
120
120
120
150
-1 50
150
150
150
150
180
180
180
180
180
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
16 0
16 0
16 0
16 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
32 0
53 0
53 0
53 CI
82 0
85 0
85 0
85 0
85 0
106 0
- - 106 0
1,023 1,318 3,595 1,734 0 1,122 3,008 0 0 2,091
NOTES: (9) Zone 9 LFMPA, adopted January 18, 1994 C.C. Reso. No. 94-27.
(1 0) From Zone 10 LFMP draft, not approved.
(1 1) Zone 1 1 LFMP, adopted February 23, 1988, C.C. Reso. No. 88-46.
(1 2) Zone 12 LFMP, adopted August 21, 1990, C.C. Reso. No. 90-264.
(1 3) Zone 14 LFMP, adopted February 6, 1990, C.C. Reso. No. 90-24.
(14) Zone 15 LFMP, adopted April 10, 1990, C.C. Reso. No. 90-101.
(15) Zone 16 LFMP, adopted April 7, 1992, C.C. Reso. No. 92-94.
(1 6) Zone 18 LFMP, adopted March 5, 1991, C.C. Reso. No. 91 -76.
0
38
38
59
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
0
0
0
0
Zone 13 L FMP 37 October 1995
YEARS
As of 111 c I 1995
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
200 1
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
201 0
201 1
201 2
201 3
201 4
201 5
201 6
201 7
201 8
201 9
TOTAL
0
70
105
105
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
139
139
139
139
139
139
139
EXHl8lT 13 (page 3 of 31
LOCAL FACILITY MANGEMENT ZONE
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
(1 7) (18) (1 9) (20) (21 1 (22)
28 1 28 181 268 0 115 1
0 0 0 0 15 0
0
15
15
15
15
15
150
150
150
150
150
150
132
170
170
170
170
170
170
165
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
0
0
0
16
16
26
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
40
45
50
50
50
50
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
139 0 86 0 0 0 0
3.272 2.480 775 866 400 427 0
ALS OF ADOPttV LFMPs
AL TU IAL TOTAL
ADOPTED CITYWIDE CITY WIDE
PHASED D. U. ’ S POPULATION
DU’S AS OF 1/1
28,662 28,662 66.433
148 28,662 66,433
31 8
488
528
628
658
797
986
1,131
1,201
1,203
1,223
1,240
1,306
1,344
1,365
1,413
1,408
1,333
1,284
1,132
951
786
807
28,810
29,128
29.,616
‘30,144
30,772
31,430
32,227
33,213
34,344
35,545
36,748
37,971
39,211
40,517
41,861
43,226
44,639
46,047
47,380
48,664
49,796
50,747
51,533
66,776
67,513
68,644
69,868
71,324
72,849
74,696
79,603
82,387
85.1 75
88.01 0
90,884
93,911
97,026
100,190
103,465
106,728
109,818
1 12,794
115,418
11 7,622
1 19,444
. 76,982
663 52,340 121,314
53.003 53.003 122.851
Notes: (1 7) Zone 19 LFMP, adopted December 8, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9322.
(18) Zone 20 LFMPA, adopted December 14, 1993 C.C. Reso. No. 93-260.
(19) Zone 21 LFMP, adopted September 17, 1991, C.C. Reso. No. 91-307.
(20) Zone 22 LFMP, adopted December 13, 1988, C.C. Reso. No. 88-428.
(21 t From Zone 23 LFMP draft, not approved.
(22) Zone 24 LFMPA, adopted January 18, 1994 C.C. Reso. No. 94-25.
Zone I3 LFMP 38 October 1995
EXHIBIT 14
NORTHWEST QUADRANT RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
201 9
rOTAL
FOR FACILITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY
90 0 0 72 0 0 I 12.220 252 0 1,225 0 427
YEARS
1s of 1/1
1995
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
201 0
201 1
201 2
201 3
2014
201 5
201 6
201 7
201 8
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
1 3 5 8 13 24
(1) (2) (31 (41 (5)
10,277 235 0 1 0 115
31 0 0 0 0 15
21
31
50
50
50
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1 1 Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221.
(21 Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9084.
(31 Zone 5 LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, C.C Reso. No. 91 88.
(41 Zone 8 LFMP, adopted February 7, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-33.
(5) Zone 24 LFMPA, adopted January 18, 1994 C.C. Reso. No. 94-25.
ADOPTED LFMP'S DTAL TOTAL
UADRANT QUADRANT
.U.'S POPULATION
S OF 1/1
~~ 10,628 24,634
10,628 24.634
10,674
10,728
10,792
10,875
10,959
1 1,046
11,173
11,300
1 1,495
11,690
11,852
12'01 4
12,176
12,338
12,500
12,662
12,824
12,987
13,150
13.31 3
13,476
13,638
13,800
24,741
24,866
25,014
25,207
25,401
25,603
25,897
26,192
26,644
27,096
27,471
27,847
28,222
28,598
28,973
29,348
29,724
30,102
30,480
30,857
31,235
31,611
31,986
13,962 32,362
14,124 32,737
Zone I3 LFMP 39 October I995
2. Non-Resideu
The citywide non-residential phasing projections, including Zone 13, are shown
on Exhibit 15 on page 41. Similar to residential phasing, these projections are
estimated for purposes of public facility planning. Exhibit 16 on page 44 indicates
the northwest quadrant non-residential phasing projections and Exhibit 17 on page
45 shows the Zone 13 non-residential phasing projections. Comparable to
residential phasing projections, these exhibits are provided to facilitate future
monitoring of this Local Facilities Management Plan.
3. su-
Both residential and non-residential phasing projections are provided in order to
plan for public facilities. The plan provides these projections to establish
thresholds which indicate the need for additional facilities. The Growth
Management Program and the Zone 13 LFMP anticipate that the actual phasing of
development in this zone will vary from these projections. In no instance,
however, will phasing be modified to the point that the performance standard will
not be met. The public facility thresholds established in this plan will ensure that
compliance with the adopted performance standards is maintained, or no
development will be allowed until compliance is reached.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 40
EXHIBIT 15
CITY WIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
FORFACILITY PLANNINGPURPOSESONLY
I
STATUE
I 20191 96,542 0 0 0 545,653 0 0 0 I TOTALI 4,578.980 423.314 2.224.767 89.21 1 22,196,299 1.778.434 119,212 399.440
Extstinc
'rojecte(
luild Ou
Notes
I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
asof 1/1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
11) (2) (3) (41 (5) 16) 17) 181
1995 2.768.773 272.589 2.082.41 5 0 8.210.006 1.000.870 1.600 0 1995 0 0 0 0 363.768 49,705 0 0
1996 0 0 0 0 181.884 42.303 0 0 1997 12.078 0 0 0 181.884 42,303 0 0
1998 12,078 0 6,434 0 345,096 42.303 0 0 1999 12.078 0 7,551 0 363,768 42,303 0 0
200 1 24,139 15.000 7,551 0 363,768 30,373 10.000 0
2002 96,542 15.000 7,551 0 363,768 30,373 10,000 0
2003 96,542 15,000 7,551 0 727,527 30,373 10,000 0
2005 96,542 15,000 7,551 0 727,527 30,373 10,000 0
2006 96,542 15,000 7,551 11,161 727,527 30,373 10.000 0 2007 96,542 15,000 7.551 11,150 727.527 30,373 10,000 19,000
2008 96,542 15,000 7,551 11,150 727.527 30,373 10,000 0 2009 96,542 15,000 7,551 11,150 727,527 30,373 10,000 109.400
2010 96,542 0 7,551 11,150 727,527 30,373 10,000 49.975 201 1 96,542 0 7,551 11,150 727.527 30,373 10,000 4,725
201 2 96,542 0 7,551 11,150 727.527 30.373 7.61 2 4,725
201 3 96,542 0 7,551 11,150 727,527 30.373 0 0
2014 96.542 0 7.551 0 727,527 30,373 0 0
201 5 96,542 0 7,551 0 545,653 30,373 0 0 2016 96,542 0 7,551 0 545.653 30.373 0 0
201 7 96.542 0 0 0 545,653 30,373 0 0
201 8 96.542 0 0 0 545.653 0 0 0
2000 12.078 15,725 7,551 0 363,768 42,298 0 79,715
2004 96,542 15,000 7,551 0 727,527 30,373 10,000 1 3 1,900
NOTES: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221.
(2) Zone 2 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9123.
(3) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9084.
14) Zone 4 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9122.
15) Zone 5 LFMP. adopted August 4. 1987, C.C Reso. No. 9188.
16) Zone 6 LFMP, adopted November 10, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9291.
(7) Zone 7 LFMP, adopted December 5, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-424.
18) Zone 8 LFMP, adopted February 7, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-33.
Zone I3 LFMP Ocrok 1995
EXHIBIT 15 lpage 2 of 31
As of 1/1
1995
I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
(91 (10) (11) (121 113) 114) (15) i16)
190.695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_.
201 8
201 9
TOTAL
1996
1997 1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003 2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 201 1
201 2
201 3
2014 201 5
201 6
201 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 52.214 0 0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 52,219 3,615,916 0 2,702,463
523,295 0 904.252 167,658 3.398.430 0 835,429 3,615,916 0 2.702.463
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,600
40.000 40.000
40.000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000 40,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100,000
1 00,000
100.000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
104.252
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38,000
0
0
80,000
49,658
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
283.400
80.000
276,040
1,365,390
200,000
140,000
390,000
40.000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000 40.000
40,000
383.600
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
52.214
52.214
52,214
52,214 52,214
52,214
52,214
52,214
52,214 52,214
52,214
52.214
52,214
52.214
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
a
NOTES: 19) Zone 9 LFMPA, adopted January 18. 1994 C.C. Reso. No. 94.27
I1 0) From Zone 10 LFMP draft. not adopted.
I1 1) Zone 11 LFMP, adopted February 23. 1988. C.C. Reso. No. 88-46. 112) Zone 12 LFMP, adopted August 21, 1990, C.C. Reso. No. 90-264.
I1 31 Zone 14 LFMP, adopted February 6. 1990. C.C. Reso. No. 90-24.
114) Zone 15 LFMP, adopted April 10, 1990. C.C. Reso. No. 90-101
115) Zone 16 LFMP, adopted April 7. 1992. C.C. Reso. No. 92-94.
116) Zone 18 LFMP, adopted March 5. 1991. C.C. Reso. No. 91-76.
ZoncIJLFMP
EXHIBIT 15 Ipago 3 of 31
YEARS
As of til
1995 I 1995
LOCAL FACILITY MANGEMENT ZONE
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
I1 71 I1 81 1191 120) (21) 1221 748.725 0 0 248.461 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 n n
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
201 0
201 1
201 2
201 3
2014
201 5
2016
201 7
2018
0
0
51,275
50,000
50.000
50.000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
107.874
107.870
107,870
107.870
107.870
107,870
107.870
107.870
107.870
107.870
107.870 0
0
0
0
100,000
100.000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2019) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL1 1,250,000 0 0 1,435,035 600.000 0 0
Notes: I1 71 Zone 19 LFMP. adopted December 8. 1987. C C. Reso. No 9322.
1181 Zone 20 LFMPA. adopted December 14, 1993 C.C Reso. No. 93-260
1191 Zone 21 LFMP. adopted September 17. 1991. C C. Reso. No. 91-30?,
1201 Zone 22 LFMP. adopted December 13. 1988, C C. Reso. No. 88-428.
121) From Zone 23 LFMP draft, not adopted.
1221 Zone 24 LFMPA. adopted January 18. 1994 C.C Reso. No. 94-25.
=Y!mr-
CITYWIDE
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
15.524.142
41 3,473
607.587
416,265
933,226
2,041,090
1,009,135
840.831
1.063.234
1,156.993
1.418.639
1,237,077
1,252,490
1,179.827
1,138.227
1,247.627
1.5 1 6.802
1.087.952
1,085,564
1,073,227
1.062.077
772,333
732,333
724.782
694.409
7.012.793 47,242.1 35
Zone I3 LFMP 43
EXHIBIT 16
NORTHWEST QUADRANT NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
STATUS
FORFACILITY PLANNINGPURPOSESONLY
YEARS LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES
QUADRANT
as of lil 1 3 5 8 13 24 SQ. FT
1995 1995
Notes
Existing
Projected
11) (2) 13) (4) (5) 2.768.773 2.082.415 8,210,006 0 0 0
0 0 363,768 0 0 0
Build Out
1996
1997 1998 1999
2000
200 1
2002
2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
2008 2009 201 0 201 1
201 2
201 3
201 4
201 5
201 6 201 7 201 8 I 20191 96,542 0 545.653 0 0
0
12,078
12.078
12,078
12.078
24,139
96.542
96.542
96,542
96,542
96,542 96,542
96,542 96.542 96,542
96,542
96,542
96,542
96,542 96,542
96,542 96,542 96,542
0
0 6,434
7,551
7,551
7,551
7,551
7,551
7,551 7,551
7,551 7,551
7,551 7,551 7,551
7,551
7,551
7,551
7,551 7,551
7,551
0
0
181,884
‘I 81,884
345.096
363.768
363,768
363,768
363,768
727.527
727.527 727,527
727.527 727.527 727.527 727.527 727,527
727.527
727.527
727.527
727,527 545,653 545,653
545,653
545.653
0
0
0
0
79,715
0
0
0
131,900
0 0 19,000 0
109,400
49,975
4,725
4.725
0
0 0 0
0
0
283,400
ao.000
276,040
1.365.390
200.000
140.000 3 90,000
40,000 40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40.000
383,600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
AS OF 111
13,061,194
13,061,194
13,424,962
13,890,246 14,164,208
14,803,056
16,552,643
17,215,755
17,751,213
18.609.074
19.4ao.694
20.4a4.214
23.1 I 8.074
21,355,834
22,227,454
23,989,694
24,970,714
26,235,909
27.072.254
27,908,599 28.740.21 9 29,571,839
30.221.585
31,513,526
‘
30.a71.331
11) Zone 1 LFMP. adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221.
(2) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9084.
(3) Zone 5 LFMP. adopted August 4, 1987, C.C Reso. No. 91 88. (4) Zone 8 LFMP. adopted February 7, 1989, C.C. Reso. No. 89-33.
(5) Zone 24 LFMPA, adopted January 18, 1994 C.C. Reso. No. 94-25.
Zone I3 LFMP 44 October 1995
EXHIBIT 17
Zone 13 Non-Resdential Phasing
FOR FACILITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY *
STATUS
ixisting
Vojected
3uild Out
YEARS
as of 1/1
1995
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
201 0
201 1
201 2
201 3
201 4
201 5
201 6
201 7
201 8
201 9
TOTAL
Zone 13
Sq. Ft.
0
0
283,400
80,000
276,040
1,365,390
200,000
1 40,000
390,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
383,600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,398,430
Zone 13 L FMP 45 October 1995
V. ZONE 13 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13 addresses eleven separate facilities at three
levels of analysis.
Level of Analysis
Facility Citywide Quadrant Zone
City Admin. Facilities 0
Library 0
Wastewater Treatment Capacity 0
Park
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Water Distribution
0
Each of these facilities is evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance
standard. For each facility analysis the following is provided:
a. An illustrative map showing facilities discussed in the section and district
boundaries;
b. The adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times
as development occurs;
c. A detailed facility adequacy and planning analysis;
d. A list of conditions necessary to ensure conformance with the adopted performance
standard;
e. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing mechanisms.
Citywide facilities (City Administrative, Library, and Wastewater Treatment) have been analyzed
in the 1986 CFIP. Analyses of these facilities are also included in this Local Facilities
Management Plan to verify compliance with the 1986 CFIP or to suggest alternatives that assure
conformance with the adopted performance standard.
Zone 13 LFMP 46 October 1995
This plan shows how each adopted performance standard will be complied with as development
occurs within Zone 13. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services. The plan
also includes a complete facility phasing schedule which is linked to public facility demands within
the zone.
Zone 13 LFMP 47 October 1995
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year
period.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Since Zone 13 will be entirely non-residential, the above performance standard does not apply.
However, an analysis of City Administrative Facilities is provided to show its current status
within the City.
This analysis provides an inventory of existing and programmed City Administrative Facilities
owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. These facilities include both permanent and'temporary
structures. This analysis projects the build out demand for City Administrative Facilities and
determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Exhibit 18 on page 49 shows the
location of the existing and future City Administration Facilities.
A. INVENTORY
.. .. 1. xisting - and Build Out Citv qamUllSUative Demand:
Citywide projected population comes from Exhibit 13. on page 36. Zone 13 has
no projected population.
Projected Population Performance Standard
Demand ( Sq. Ft.)
Existing (1/1/95):
Citywide
Zone 13
Build Out:
Citywide (2019)
Zone 13 (2019)
66,433
0
122,851
0
99,650
0
184,277
0
Zone 13 LFMP 48 October 1995
LEGEND
KI civic Center FI Housing & Redevelopment
Oceanside
I I Water District IT] Community Development 131 Central Maintenance & Warehouse - Proposed
141 Fire & Police Safety Center
Encinitas
fi Hofman Planning
Associates
Zone 13 - City Administration Facilities
EXHIBIT 18
49
.. .. 2. hventorv of E- Citv Administrati ve Fac il i t ies :
The existing City Administrative Facilities owned and leased by the City of
Carlsbad as of January 1, 1995 are:
Permanent Temporary Leased
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
City Hall
(1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.)
Main Building 12,899
Finance Modular 2.700
hrchasing/Personnel Modular 1,800
Redevelopment
(2965 B Roosevelt)
3,200
Community Development 22,627
(2075 Las Palmas Dr.)
Public Safety and
Service Center (I)
(2560 Orion Way)
Police and Fire 53,700
Vehicle Maintenance 10,358
Water District Office 18,000
Total 117.584 4.500 3.200
Total Existing Facilities 125,284
Existing City Administrative Facilities as of January 1, 1995 exceed the
performance standard. However, 2.6 percent of the total square footage is leased
and another 3.6 percent is in temporary modular units. If the leases are terminated
or temporary facilities are no longer used, thereby reducing existing City
Administrative Facilities, this analysis would need to be redone to assess
compliance with the adopted performance standard.
.. ... 3. InventQLv of Appro ved Future City Awlstrati ve Facib:
The adopted 1994-1995 Capital Improvement Program (CC Reso. No. 240) funds
the following City Administrative Facilities for construction within 5 years (199):
October 1995 Zone 13 LJMP 50
Facility Square Feet Funding Year cost Source
Central Maintenance and 62,000 1999-2004 $3,455,000 PFF6
warehouse facility
New City Hall 96,000 1999-2004 $23,100,000 PFF
No other City Administrative Facilities are identified within the City's adopted
CIP.
Existing City Administrative Facilities plus those scheduled for construction within
five years in the adopted 1994-95 CIP are as follows:
Permanent Temporary Leased
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Existing 117,584 4,500 3,200
Central Maintenance and
warehouse facility
62,000
New City Hall 96,000
Subtotal 275,584 4,500 3,200
Total Existing Facilities 283,284
B. PHASING
The citywide residential phasing projections on Exhibit 13 on page 36 are incorporated
into Exhibit 19 on page 52. Exhibit 19 projects the adequacy of City Administrative
Facilities on a Citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and
funded facilities .
PFF = Public Facilities Fee
October 1995 Zone 13 LJMP 51
EXHIBIT 19
ZONE 13 - PHASING OF CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES
(1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATlONl
STATUS
EXISTING
PROJECTED
RESIDENTIAL D\
IN
OTHER
ADOPTED
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
201 1
201 2
201 3
2014
201 5
2016
201 7
201 8
28,810
29,128
29,616
30,144
30,772
31,430
32,227
33,213
34,344
35,545
36,748
37,971
39.21 1
40,517
41,861
43,226
44,639
46,047
47,380
48,664
49,796
50,747
51,533
LLING UN
IN
ZONE 13
(2'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
IN TOTAL
ADOPTED
PLANS
(31
28.662
28,662
28,810
29,128
29.61 6
30,144
30,772
31,430
32,227
33,213
34,344
35,545
36,748
37,971
39.21 1
40,517
41,861
43,226
44.639
46,047
47,380
48,664
49,796
50,747
51,533
52,340
53,003
ADOF
ADOPTED
ZONES
PO PU LATlO N
(41 66.433
66,433
66.776
67.51 3
68,644
69,868
71,324
72.849
74,696
76,982
79,603
82,387
85,175
88,010
90,884
93.91 1
97,026 100,190
103,465
106,728
109.81 8
11 2,794
1 15,418
11 7,622 1 19,444
121,314
122,851
iD PHASINC
ADOPTED
ZONES
DEMAND
99,650
99,650
100,164
101,270
102,966
104,802
106,986
109,274
1 12,044
11 5,473
1 19,405
123.581
127,763
132.01 5
136,326
140.867
145,539
150,285
155,198
160,092
164,727
169,191 173.1 27
176,433
179.1 66
181,971
184,277
(DEQUACY AP
PROJECTED
CITYWIDE
ADMlN
SUPPLY
125,284
125,284
125,284
125,284
125,284
283.284
283.284
283,284
283,284
283,284
283,284
283,284
2 83,284
2 83,284
283,284
283.284
283,284
283,284
283,284
283,284
283,284
283,284 283,284
283,284
283,284
283.284
283,284
LYSIS
PROJECTED
ADOPTED
ADEQUACY:
IINADEQUACY)
25.634
25,634
25,120
24.01 4
22,318
178.482
176,298
174,010
171,240
167,81 1
163,879
159.703
155,521
151,269
146,958
142.41 7
137.745
132,999
128,086
123,192
11 8.557
1 14,093 110,157
106,851
104,118
101,313
99.007
NOTES (1 ) Dwelling units in Other Adopted Zone Plans are those projected in the LFMP for Zones 1-1 2, 14-1 6, 18-24
(2) Source - Exhibit 14.
(3) Total adopted dwelling units include the adopted zones 1-1 3, 14-1 6, 18-24
(4) Existing citywide population is the base population used for projecting Adopted Zone Plan Populations.
(5) Central Maintenance and Warehouse Facilities.
(6) 96,000 sq ft for New City Hall.
Zone 13 L FMP 52 October I995
111.
IV.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Zone 13 is wholly comprised of non-residential development and therefore does not impact
City Administrative Facilities per the adopted performance standard.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions
No special conditions.
FINANCING
..
A combination of pub,,^ Facilities Fees (PFF), Sewer Fees, and the CitywIU< Mello Roos
Community Facilities District (CFD) will be used to fund the following projects:
Facility Cost Source
Las Palmas Facility $2,500,000 (PFF)
Central Maintenance and Warehouse Facilities $3,700,000 (CFD)
Citv Hall - Future $23.100.000 (CFD).
Total $29,300,000
. Zone 13 will contribute to the funding of City Administration Facilities through the payment of
Mello Roos Taxes. Other than these standard contributions, no special financing mechanisms for
City Administrative Facilities will be required as a condition of development within Zone 13.
Exhibit 20 on page 54 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes
the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing
budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options.
53 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
EXHIBIT 20
ZONE 13 - CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITY FINANCING AS OF 1 I1 195
ILITY
CI fY ADMINISTRATION
1. Las Palmas Debt Service
2. Central Maintenance and
Warehouse Facility
- Design
- Construction
3. New City Hall
Total City Administration Costs
AMOUNT
22,627 sf
NA
62,000 sf
96,000 sf
ESTIMATED
COST
$2,500,000
$500,000
$3,700,000
$23,100,000
$29.800.000
TIMING
1990-1 998
1999-2004
1999-2004
1999-2004
FU
FIRST
City - PFF
Sewer
Citywide
Mello Roos
Citywide
Mello Roos
I
DING OPTIC
SECOND
I
IS
THIRD
Notes:
(1) Zone 13 does not impact City Administration Facilities per
the adopted performance standard. There are no special
conditions required of Zone 13 and other than the payment of
the City's Public Facility Fee (PFF), Sewer Fee and participation,
in the Citywide Mello Roos District, no special funding is required.
(2) Annexation of properties in Zone 13 into the Mello Roos CFD will
occur on a project by project basis prior to discretionary approval.
Zone 13 LFMP October 1995
LIBRARY FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
800 square feet per 1,OOO population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Since Zone 13 will be entirely non-residential, the above performance standard does not apply.
However, an analysis of Library Facilities is provided to show its current status within the City.
This analysis provides an inventory of existing and approved library facilities owned and leased
by the City of Carlsbad. This analysis projects the build out demand for library facilities and
determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Future citywide library facility
demand is projected based on the 1994-95 Capital Improvement Program, the adopted LFMP's
and Zone 13. Exhibit 21 on page 56 shows the location of existing and future library facilities.
A. INVENTORY
1. Build Out 1.ibrary Demand:
Citywide projected population comes from Exhibit 13 on page 36. Zone 13 has
no projected population.
Projected Population Performance Standard
Demand ( Sq. Ft.)
Existing (1/1/95):
Citywide 66,433 . 53,147
Zone 13 0 0
Build Out:
Citywide (2019)
Zone 13 (2019)
122.85 1
0
98,281
0
Zone 13 LFMP 55 October 1995
Oceanside
LEGEND Encinitas
171. Civic Center Library I-?-( Warehouse 131 South Carlsbad Library - Proposed
151 Centro de lnformacion
h:nTM
How NoE MLLOUTK)HI~~O~*UTE 141 La Costa Branch Library
Zone 13 - Library Facilities
EXHIBIT 21 a Hofman Planning MA s s oc i at e s
56
.. ... 2. Inventory of Existinp Libraw Fac 1lm:
3.
Existing library facilities owned and leaseti by the City of Carlsbad as of January
1, 1995 are the following:
Facility Owned (Sq. Ft.) Leased (Sq. Ft.)
Civic Center Library - 24,600
(1200 Carlsbad Village Drive)
Adult Learning Center
(1207 Carlsbad Village Drive)
La Costa Area Library’
(7750 El Camino Real)
Warehouse
(2075 Corte De Nogal)
400
5,600
2,060
Centro De Informacion 900 (3333 Harding St. Pine School,
Room 11)
Total 24,600 8,960
Total Existing Facilities 33.560
... InVentOW Of ADDrO ved Future 1 ,ibrarv Facilitia:
South Carlsbad Library:
A six acre City owned site has been identified and designed for the South Carlsbad
Library. This library is projected to be 64,OOO square feet in size.
According to City staff, the 8,060 square feet of existing leased library space will
expire and be vacated when the South Carlsbad library is constructed. The 1994-
95 CIP allocates funds for construction of the new library in the 1996-97 fiscal
year.
The South Carlsbad library site was approved by the City Council on July 7,
19878. The site is near the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road,
shown on Exhibit 21 on page 56.
’ The existing 8,060 square feet of leased library space will expire when the new
South Carlsbad Library is constructed.
The staff report for this action is contained in Appendix A-2, Agenda Bill No.
8867.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 57
North Carlsbad Library Expansion:
The 1994-95 Capital Improvements program shows funds for construction of the
North Carlsbad Library Expansion in 2004+. This expansion will provide
approximately 8,000 square feet of additional library space.
Build Out Library:
Funds for an additional 17,331 square feet of Library space for Build Out are
shown in 2004+ in the 1994-95 Capital Improvements Program.
The following is a summary of the 1994-95 Capital Improvement Program funding
allocation for library facilities:
South Carlsbad Library:
DescriDtion Funding Year Cost
Construction Bonds 1996- 1997 $1 1,200,000
Total $1 1,200,000
North Carlsbad Library Expansion:
Description Funding Year Cost
Construction 2004 + $4.000.o00
Total $4,000,000
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 58
Build Out Library:
Description Cost
Construction 2000+ 98,666.000
Total $8,666, 000 B. PHASING
Existing library facilities plus those budgeted in the adopted 1994-95 CIP for construction
are as follows:
Square Feet of Library Space
Added Subtracted . Total
1995:
Existing:
Civic Center Library
Adult Learning Center
La Costa Area Library
Centro De lnformacion
Warehouse
33.560
1%:
S. Carlsbad Library 64,000 97,560
Adult Learning Center 400
La Costa Area Library 5,600
Warehouse 2.060 89.500
2004+ :
N. Carisbad Librarv ExDansion 8.000 97.500
~~ ~~
Build Out Library 17,331 114,831
To assess when the threshold for future library facilities will be reached, the phasing
projections on Exhibit 13 on page 36 are used. These phasing projections are incorporated
into Exhibit 22 on page 60. Exhibit 22 projects the adequacy of library facilities on a
citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded
facilities.
Zone 13 UMP 59 October 1995
EXHIBIT 22
(800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION)
ZONE 13 - PHASING OF LIBRARY FACILITIES
20191 52,340 0 52.340 TOTAL1 53,003 0 I 53,003
STATUS
EXISTING
PROJECTEC
BUILD OUl 121,314 1 122,851
ADOPTED
97,052
98,281
1996 28,810
1997 29,128
1998 29,616
1999 30,144
2000 30,772
2001 31.430
2002 32.227
2003 33,213
2004 34,344
2005 35.545
2006 36,748
2007 37,971
2008 39.211 2009 40,517
2010 41.861
2011 43,226
2012 44,639
2013 46.047
2014 47,380
2015 48.664
2016 49,796
2017 50.747
2018 51,533 114,831 I 114,831
tL DWELL
IN
ZONE 13
(21 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G UNITS
IN TOTAL
4DOPTED
PLANS
131 28.662
28,662
28.810
29.128
29,616
30.144
30,772
31,430
32,227
33,213
34,344
35,545
36.748
37,971
39.21 1
40.51 7
41,861
43.226
44,639
46,047
47.380
48,664
49,796
50,747
51,533
ADOPT
ADOPTED
ZONES
POPULATION
(4)
66,433
66,433
66,776
67,513
68,644
69,868
71,324
72.849
74,696
76,982
79.603
82,387
85,175
88.01 0
90.884
93,911
97.026
100,190
103.465
106.728
109.81 8
112.794
115,418
11 7.622
1 19.444
PHASING
ADOPTED
ZONES
DEMAND
53,147
53,147
53,421
54.01 1
54,916
55,895
57.060
58,280
59,757
61.586
63,683
65,910
68,140
70.408
72.708
75,129
77,621
80.152
82,772
85.383
87,855
90,236
92,335
94,098
95,556
DEQUACY AI
'ROJECTED
CITYWIDE
LIBRARY
SUPPLY
89.500
89,500
89.500
89,500
89,500
89.500
89,500
89,500
89.500
89,500
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114.831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
114,831
4LYSIS
PROJECTED
ADOPTED
ADEQUACY/
NADEQUACY
36,353
36.353
36.079
35,489
34,584
33,605
32,440
31,220
29,743
27,914
51,148
48,921
46,691
44.423
42,123
39,702
37,210
34,679
32.059
29.448
26,976
24.595
22,496
20.733
19,275
17.779
16,550
NOTES. (1) Dwelling units in Other Adopted Zone Plans are those projected in the LFMP for Zones 1-12. 14-16, 18--24
(2) Source - Exhibit 14.
(3) Total adopted dwelling units include the adopted zones 1-13, 14-16, 18-24.
(4) Existing citywide population is the base population used for prolecting Adopted Zone Plan Populations.
(5) 31,560 square feet existing, plus 64,000 square feet expansion of South Carkbad Library minus 6.960 leased space.
(6) 8,000 square feet expansion of North Carlsbad Library.
(7) 17,731 square feet additional library for build out.
Zonr13LFMP 60 October 1995
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Analysis of Zone 13's demand on library facilities as of 1/1/95 indicates no mitigation is
needed at this the. The performance standard is currently being conformed with and is
projected to conform until build out. The yearly monitoring program will assure that the
adopted performance standard is complied with through build out.
Since there is no residential development planned for Zone 13, no special conditions are
required.
111. MITIGATION
Special Coruium ..
No special conditions.
IV. FINANCING
South Carlsbad Library:
On July 7, 1987, the City Council took action for the acquisition, grading, design and construction
of the 58,000 square foot South Carlsbad Library. On April 10, 1990, the City Council approved
expansion of this facility from 58,000 square feet to 64,OOO square feet. Although the City
Council has guaranteed the needed funds, the long term financing mechanisms may be modified
at some time in the future.
The South Carlsbad Library will be funded by the Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District.
North Carlsbad Library:
The Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District includes !§4,O0O,O0O for the construction
of the North Carlsbad.Library expansion in 2004. This will provide an additional 8,000 square
feet of library space at the existing library on 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive for a total of 32,600
square feet.
Build Out Library:
The 1994-95 CIP indicates that $5,060,000 for an additional 17,331 square feet of library facilities
will be funded in 2004+ to fulfill the demand for libraries at build out. This space will likely be
added to existing facilities.
The primary source of funding will be Public Facility Fees. This fee is collected at the time
building permits are issued for all residential, commercial and industrial developments.
Zone 13 w;MP 61 October 1995
Exhibit 23 on page 63 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes
the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing
budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the fuu-e funding options.
Zone 13 LFMP 62 October 1995
EXHISIT 23
ZONE 13 - LIBRARY FACILITIES FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1 11 195
FACILITY ' 'WARY FACILITIES AMOUNT
I. Library Expansion 8,000 sf
2. Library - For Build 17,331 sf
Out Population
3. Library - Renovate Cole N/A
4. Library - South Carlsbad 64,000 sf
Land, Design, Construction
TOTAL LIBRARY COSTS
ESTIMATED
COST
$4,000,000
$8,660,000
$1,575,000
$1 1,200,000
$25,435,000
TIMING
2004 +
2004 +
998-99
996-97
FL
-FIRST
Citywide
Mello Roos
City - PFF
City - PFF
Citywide
Mello Roos
DING OPTIC
SECOND THIRD NOTES
12) I i
(1 ) Zone 13 does not impact Library Facilities per the adopted
performance standard. There are no special conditions
required of Zone 13 and other than the payment of the City's
Public Facility Fee (PFF) and participation in the Citywide
Mello Roos District, no special funding is required.
(2) Annexation of properties in Zone 13 into the Mello Roos CFD will
occur on a project by project basis prior to discretionary approval.
Zone 13 LFMP
-
63 October 1995
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Sewer treatment plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. INVENTORY
Wastewater Treatment in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies:
The City of Carlsbad Municipal Water District, Leucadia County Water District (LCWD)
and Vallecitos Water District as shown on Exhibit 25 on page 65. Wastewater Treatment
is provided primarily at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) and also at
satellite treatment facilities.
Ownership as well as wastewater treatment capacity of the Encina WPCF is shared on a
percentage basis by six independent sewer districts. Exhibit 24 lists the six agencies and .
their permitted treatment capacity to the Encina WPCF as follows:
Exhibit 24
Encina WPCF Capacity Analysis
Agency Percent Capacity Capacity Satellite Available Existing Remaining
Ownership at Encina Adjusted for Treatment Treatment Flow Treatment
WPCF Leases Capacity Capacity (MGD) Capacity
. (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD)
Notes. 12) (3)
Vista
Carlsbad
22.36 8.05 8.05 _. 8.05 5.49 2.56
25.67 9.24 9.24 1.20 (I) 9.24 5.48 3.76
Buena 6.28 2.26 2.26 1.16 3.42 1.21 2.21
Vallecitos 20.94 1.54 7.54 2.00 9.54 4.35 5.19
Lrucadia 19.75 7.11 7.11 0.75 7.86 3.40 4.46
Encinitas 5.15 I .80 1 .m __ 1.80 1.12 0.68
TOTAL 100.00 36.00 36.00 5.11 39.91 , 21.05 18.86
NOTES: 1. Currently not operational.
2. Summary of Leases:
3. Three month average as of February. 1995
1) Encinitas to LCWD 0.15 MGD
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 64
Oceanside
Carlsbad Municipal
Water District
**S.r.r.-.r..
Water District
I
1 LEGEND Encinitas
1
2
3 Meadowlark Reclamation Facility
. Calavera Hills ReclamationlTreatment Facility
Encina Water Pollution Control Facility
Y?RTH nom 4 Gafner Wastewater Reclamation Facility mTE IUL Lourn APPROlPYITE
Hofman Planning Zone 13 -Wastewater Facilities
Associates EXHIBIT25
Vista 3
65
Currently, the Encina WPCF has capacity to treat 36.0 million gallons per day (MGD).
Ultimately, this facility will be able to treat up to 45 MGD. As shown below, Carlsbad
Sewer Service District owns limited treatment capacity in a smaller localized satellite
treatment facility:
Carlsbad Municipal Water District:
Percentage of Encina Capacity (25.67 %)
Calavera Hills Treatment Facility (Currently not operational)
9.24 MGD
1.20 MGD
9.24 MGD TOTAL AVAILABLE TREATMENT CAPACITY
Capacity at the Encina WPCF is separated into two categories: Treatment capacity and
outfall capacity. This analysis will deal primarily with treatment capacity.
The Encina Ocean Outfall is a drainage line that transports the treated sewage (effluent)
from the Encina WPCF and satellite facilities and discharges approximately 8.900 feet into
the Pacific Ocean.. Currently, the Encina Ocean Outfall has a design capacity of 38.0
million gallons per day (MGD) capacity. The outfall capacity is shared by six sewer
districts and is projected to provide sufficient capacity to the year 2000. Outfall capacity
just as treatment capacity, is shared on a percentage basis by the six sewer service
districts .
.. ... 1. xlstl-:
The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two wastewater treatment plant
facilities. Primary treatment capacity is provided through Encina WPCF which is
a regional facility owned by six member agencies. The current rate of capacity of
Encina WPCF is 36.0 MGD of which Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.67 percent
or 9.24 MGD.
The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera Hills Wastewater Treatment
Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The Calavera Hills Facility is not
operational at this time and would require approximately $2.33 million to make it
operational. Operation at the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated to cost $360,000
per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per
year. The Calavera Hills Plant is not economical to operate for treatment capacity
except in the absence of needed capacity at Encina WPCF.
Zone 13 LFMP 66 October 1995
B. PHASING
Exhibit 26 on page 68 shows the existing and projected demand and treatment capacity for
Carlsbad Sewer Service District. Existing demand is 5.63 MGD with current capacity at
the Encina WPCF at 9.24 MGD. Additional expansion to accommodate increased flow
in the future is being planned for by the Encina Wastewater Authority. According to
Encina WPCF's 2020 Facility Plan Update Report, dated February 1993, projected future
flow could reach 53.7 MGD. To accommodate this projected flow, additional phases are
outlined in the 2020 Facility Plan Update Report that will provide Encina with the capacity
to handle 56.0 MGD.
1. Phasa and Service Demand
Wastewater treatment service area ultimate flow projections for the Encina WPCF
service district is depicted in the following chart:
ENCINA WPCF
TIER TWO PROJECTED ULTIMATE FLOWS
Member Agency EWPCF Influent (MGD)
Vista
Carlsbad
Leucadia
Vallecitos
Buena
Encinitas
10.50
13.40
8.85
15.72
3.47
1.80
TOTAL 53.74
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Exhibit 26 on page 68 estimates the necessary treatment capacity needed to accommodate
growth within the Carlsbad sewer service area to the year 2010.
Zone 13 WMP 67 October 1995
Exhibit 26 Carlsbad Projections
Carlsbad Service Area Demand and
Available Treatment Capacity
Status End of Year Service Area Flow (MGD) Encina Adequacy
EDU Capacity (MGD)
(MGD)
Existing
Projected
Projected
Projected
1994 25,620 5.63 9.24 3.61
I995 25,924 5.70 9.24 3.54
2000 30,423 6.69 9.24 2.55
20 10 33,478(a) 7.37 9.24 1.87
~ ~ ~~
(a) Ultimate projection for City of Carlsbad according to 1994 General Plan.
111. MITIGATION
.. ecial Conditiom
The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater
treatment capacity through the year 2010:
1. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates
and to have an early warning of capacity problems.
IV. FINANCING
Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and
expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism
of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. Carlsbad
Sewer Service District has projected Capital Improvement funds to provide for needed facilities.
Exhibit 27 on page 69 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes
the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction. the existing
budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options.
Zone 13 LFMP 68 October 1995
EXHIBIT 27
ESTIMATED
FACILITY COST TIMING 3TEWATER FACILITIES
Encina Solids Management $10,609,746 1990-2000.
TOTAL WASTEWATER COSTS $10,609,746
ZONE 13 - WASTEWATER FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1/1/95
FUNDING OPTIONS
FIRST SECOND THIRD NOTES
Sewer Fees (1)
Notes:
(1) No special funding is required at this time. Zone 13 will
contribute to the funding of wastewater facilities through
the payment of sewer connection fees at time of development
Zone 13 LFMP 69 October 7995
(This page intentionally left blank)
Zone 13 LFMP 70 October 1995
(This page intentionally left blank)
Zone 13 LFMP 71 October 1995
(This page intentionally left blank)
Zone I3 LFMP 72 October 1995
(This page intentionally left blank)
Zone 13 LFMP 73 October 1995
PARK FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per.1 ,OOO population within the Park District
must be scheduled for construction within a five year period.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Zone 13 is located within Park District 1 as shown on Exhibit 28 page 75. However, Zone 13
is composed exclusively of non-residential uses. The Growth Management Program does not
identify a parks performance standard for non-residential uses. Currently, non-residential uses
are required to pay Public Facilities Fees. A percentage of all Public Facilities Fees collected are
allocated for the construction and improvements of City parks. In addition, residential
development pays a Park-In-Lieu fee to pay for the acquisition of City park land. Nonresidential
development is not required to pay Park-In-Lieu fees.
The issue of recreational facilities for non-residential zones was addressed by the City with the
adoption of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and subsequently the Zone 16 Local
Facilities Management Plan. Because of the large projection of employees in these entirely non-
residential zones and the employees use of City parks, the City felt it appropriate to provide
recreational facilities for non-residential zones. In order to pay for these park facilities, the City
has adopted a fee of 40 cents per square foot of nonresidential development within Zones 5
and 16.
The purpose of the fee is to fund recreational facilities located within the industrial corridor of the
City of Carlsbad. The use to which the fee will be put is the purchase and improvement of 8 to
15 acres on one or more sites within the industrial corridor that may include but is not limited to
the following improvements; fitness center, swimming pool, lighted ball fields, lighted tennis
courts. and lighted outdoor racquetball/handball courts. The determination of the reasonable
relationship between the fee use and the industrial development on which the fee is imposed is
based upon needs assessments surveys carried out by the San Diego Association of Governments
for the City of Carlsbad and Analysis/Research Limited working for the development community
as reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission Sub-committee on Park Fees for Local
Facilities Management Plan Zone 5.9 The same needs assessment surveys combined with the Park
and Recreation Element of the General Plan recognition via policy statement specifically
encouraging industrial development to provide recreational facilities for their day use population
provides the reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility, and the industrial
corridor upon which it is imposed. The determination of the reasonable relationship between the
amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable
to the development on which the fee is imposed is a
See Agenda Bill 9122-1 with attachments and memo from planning director to city
manager dated 7-30-87, located in Appendix A-4, Parks.
74 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
Oceanside
Vista 4
~ LEGEND Encinitas
~ r1 , Northwest Quadrant - District 1 FI Northeast Quadrant - District 2 [jl Southwest Quadrant - District 3
13RTH
NOTE MLLOUTHW*PPROXIMTE Nosas 141 Southeast Quadrant - District 4
Hofman Planning Associates
Zone 13 -Park Districts
EXHIBIT 28
75
product of the equitable relationship between the estimated cost of the facility and the fees
collected at building permit issuance from zones 5, 13, and 16.
At build out of Zone 13, there will be approximately 3,398,430 square feet of non-residential
development. If a ratio of one employee per 544 square feet is used, the buildout square footage
corresponds to a potential workday population of 6,248 employees.
In order to serve the needs of future employees, recreational facilities should be provided for Zone
13. Similar to Zones 5 and 16, a fee per square foot of non-residential development could be
collected at time of building permit issuance. These fees would be earmarked for the acquisition
and construction of recreational amenities within the industrial corridor of Carlsbad. If a fee of
40 cents per square foot, comparable to Zones 5 and 16, is adopted in Zone 13, the projected
development in Zone 13 would generate approximately $1.36 million through build out.
111. MITIGATION
A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-residential development will
be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will be used to construct recreational
facilities to offset the demand created by employees within Zone 13.
IV. FINANCING
Non-residential development will be required to pay a Public Facility Fee at building permit
issuance and a portion of the fee shall contribute to the construction and improvement of City
parks.
In addition, a park fee of 40 cents per square foot shall be collected at building permit issuance
to provide for recreational amenities within the industrial corridor of Carlsbad.
76 October 1995 Zone I3 LFMP
DRAINAGE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Management Zone 13 is located within two watersheds, the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed
(Watershed B) and the Canyon De Las Encinas Watershed (Watershed C). The natural drainage
boundary between these watersheds is shown on Exhibit 29 on page 78.
The information contained in this report was obtained from the adopted "Master Drainage and
Storm Water Quality Management Plan" for the City of Carlsbad, California, dated March, 1994,
prepared by the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. This Master Plan sets forth the
comprehensive drainage systems necessary to meet the long-term needs of the City. Additional
information was obtained from the "As Built" records of existing improvements and the City of
Carlsbad Engineering Department.
As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from
all other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately
assessed as specific development plans are finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary
which are larger than those required from a single development project and, therefore, need to
be identified so that the proper funding can be collected for the construction of these facilities.
A. INVENTORY
1.
Existing major drainage facilities within the boundaries of Zone 13 include 2
18!'storm drains, one 24" storm drain, one 60" storm drain and one 72" storm
drain crossing under Palomar Airport Road along the Southern boundary of Zone
13. There are two 60" storm drains and an existing channel crossing under the San
Diego Northern right-of-way. Exhibit 30 on page 79 shows these facilities.
The proposed major drainage facilities for the ultimate build out of Management
Zone 13 are shown according to the Master Drainage Plan. Exhibit 30 on page 79
shows the Master Plan's major drainage facilities proposed for the development of
Management Zone 13.
Zone 13 LFMP 77 October 1995
LEGEND
. Basin Boundary .
~ 1- If* *'I Creek Flow Line
~ I I Direction of Flow
Zone 13 - Drainage Basins
EXHIBIT 29
78
9 % ---p
Existing Channel - -
2-60" 3'
Canyon de las \ \ Encinas Watershed
\ 9,
i \" -0 : 51"
Existi{g Existing
18 24" LEGEND
PI. Basin Boundary I_] Direction of Flow Existing Channel
Creek Flow Line
Existing Storm Drain
IT] Storm Drain CC F] Storm Drain CB
u:niH
NOM Proposed Storm Drain 171 Storm Drain BAA NOTE MLLOCITIMISAFPROXJYE
44 Hofman Planning 44~ s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - Major Drainage Facilities
EXHIBIT 30
79
All proposed facilities shown in Exhibit 30 are listed below. All facilities are
located in Canyon de las Encinas and Agua Hedionda Creek Watersheds.
Item Facility
I A 42-inch and 5 1-inch storm drain flowing into an existing 72" storm drain in
Palomar Airport Road. (Storm Drain CC)
A 42-inch and 48-inch storm drain flowing into an existing 60" storm drain in
Palomar Airport Road. (Storm Drain CB)
A 51-inch storm drain flowing into an existing 96-inch storm drain west of Interstate
5. The 51-inch storm drain will parallel and alleviate an existing undersized 66-inch
storm drain. Also a double 60-inch storm drain to replace an existing undersized 30-
inch storm drain under San Diego Northern Railway and associated channel grading,
erosion control measures and revegetation measures. Construction of the double 60-
inch culverts and associated grading has begun and is scheduled to be completed by
early 1995. (Storm Drain BAA)
2
3.
The location and size of the proposed storm drain facilities have been approximated
for the purposes of this plan. The future storm drain facilities may vary from the
facilities shown in this zone plan due to the unknown size and geometrics of the
future development planned for the surrounding area. The actual location, size and
types of these storm drain facilities will be determined as the area develops and the
storm runoff is analyzed according to current design standards.
The City has recently revised the Drainage Master Plan. The updated version
analyzes the adequacy of the existing storm drain facilities and proposes the
construction of specific major storm drain facilities so that future development will
continue to conform with the adopted performance standard as development occurs.
The Drainage Master Plan, dated March 1994, was approved by City Council
September 13, 1994.
B. PHASING
The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on
ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development.
Watershed boundaries are shown on Exhibit 29 on page 78 and correlate with the natural
drainage basins of the proposed facilities within the Zone. There are two separate
watersheds, the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed and the Canyon de las Encinas
Watershed. Thresholds for the major drainage facilities within each watershed can be
easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures.
The watershed boundaries allow for independent review and development for the drainage
facilities within each boundary. However, the City may require improvements outside of
the watershed boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development.
Zone 13 w;MP 80 October 1995
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Presently, there are no existing major storm drain facilities within Zone 13 other than the
existing facilities crossing under Palomar Airport along the Zone's Southern boundary.
Also. there will be no need for such facilities until development occurs. Major drainage
facilities will be a condition to the approval of future development in Zone 13 so that
conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained.
111. MITIGATION
.. ecial Condltlons
A. All future development in Zone 13 will be required to construct any future Zone 13 storm
drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master Plan and revised Drainage Master
Plan, or acceptable alternate facilities, as determined by the City Engineer. Any facilities
necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation
of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, for any development
requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 13.
B. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit,
whichever occurs first for any specific watershed within Zone 13, the developers of that
project are required to:
1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan
C. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit.
whichever occurs first for any project within the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed
(Watershed B) of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required to financially
guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or alternative facilities
deemed acceptable by the City Engineer:
1. 5 1 " storm drain; the double 60-inch storm drain and channel grading; collectively
referred to as line BAA
D.
.
Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit,
whichever occurs first for any project within the Canyon de las Encinas Watershed
(Watershed C) of Zone 13, the developers of that project are required to financially
guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities, or alternative facilities
deemed acceptable by the City Engineer:
1. 42" - 48" storm drain line CB
2. 42" - 51" storm drain line CC
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 81
111. FINANCING
A. Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed:
The cost of the proposed storm drains within the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed is
estimated to be $873,439. These storm drains are anticipated to be financed by the
developers within the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed, and through Planned Local
Drainage Area (PLDA) fees, collected at the time of development.
B. Canyon de las Encinas Watershed:
The cost of the proposed storm drains within the Canyon de las Encinas Watershed is
estimated to be $1,651,612 These storm drains are anticipated to be financed by the
developers within the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed.
An itemized cost estimate of these facilities is contained in Exhibit 3 1 on page 83. This estimate
should only be used as a guide to approximate costs for preliminary planning purposes. Further
cost analysis should be made as planning and design progress in Zone 13.
Zone 13 LFMP 82 October 1995
EXHIBIT 31
ZONE 13 - DRAINAGE FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1/1/95
FACILITY
ton de Ias Encinas Watershed:
Storm Drain CB
42" RCP
48" RCP
Cleanouts
Catch Basins
Headwalls
Subtotal Area C8
15% Contingency
20% Engr. and Admin
Storm Drain CB Total
Storm Drain CC
42" RCP
51"
Cleanouts
Catch Basins
Headwalls
Subtotal Area CC
15% Contingency
20% Enqr. and Admin
Storm Drain CC Total
Total Canyon de las Encinas Cost
Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed:
Storm Drain BAA
51" RCP
Repaving 5 1 "
Cleanouts
60" RCP 50' RCP Jack and Bonng
me1 Grading
on Control Rip Rap
I ,,degetation - Planting
Headwalls
Subtotal Area BAA
15% Contingency
20% Enar. and Admin
Storm Dyain BAA Total
Total Agua Hedionda Creek Cost
Total Drainage Facilities Cost
Notes:
AMOUNT
1,100 LF
2,700 LF
13 EA
8 EA
1 EA
3,450 LF
700 LF
15 EA
10 EA
1 EA
1200 LF
1200 LF
2 EA
106 LF
106 LF
14.000 CY
8,250 SF
52,800 SF
2 EA
ESTIMATED
COST
$1 29,800
$348.300
539.650
$56,320
$2,500
$576.570
$86.486
$132.61 1
$795.667
$407.100
$94.500
$45.750
$70.400
$2.500
$620.250
$93,038
$1 42,658
$855.945
$1,651,612
$1 62,000
$29.940
56,100
$20,034 $25,440
51 36,500
$49.913
$1 98,000
55.000
$632.927
$94.939
$145.573
$873.439
$2,525.051
$873,439
TIMING
Concurrent
w/Development
FU
FIRST
Developer
.1 .
31NG OPTIC
SECOND
S
THIRD NOTES
(1 I
(1 Developer(s) within the respective watersheds shall construct
the necessary drainage facilities concurrent with development
The City shall be guaranteed of this construction by imposing
the appropriate conditions on the pertinent tentative maps or
site development plans, as the case may be.
Zone 13 LFMP 83
This page intentionally Left Blank
Zone 13 w;MP a4 October 1995
CIRCULATION FACILITIES
I.
11.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone
which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a Level of Service C
during off-peak hours, nor Level of service D during peak hours. Impacted is when twenty
percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the
road segment or intersection.
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
This analysis determines whether or not the circulation system within Zone 13 conforms to the
adopted performance standard. It will also address all circulation element road segments and
intersections outside of Zone 13 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by
Zone 13 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard.
This section is based on the "Transportation Analysis For The Carlsbad Local Facilities
Management Plan - Zone 13" report prepared by KAKU Associates, Inc., dated August 1994.
In order to determine the transportation related impacts which are likely to result from land uses
within Zone 13 and to develop the off-site transportation improvements phasing plan, KAKU
obtained and evaluated existing traffic flow data for the area. Projections for future short-term
and long-term traffic flow were provided by the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG) in their City of Carlsbad Year 2010 General Plan Traffic Forecast of February.
1994. A SANDAG forecast for the year 2000, including Zone 13 land uses as proposed was also
used.
A. INVENTORY
1. nt Roads Within Zone 13
a. Cannon Road
Cannon Road presently extends approximately 1900 feet east of
Interstate 5. Eventually Cannon Road will extend east, through Zones 13
and 8 to El Camino Real and extend through Zone 15 to the easterly city
limits.
b. Palomar Airport Road
Palomar Airport Road is currently a partially improved primary arterial
street. It extends from the easterly city limit, intersecting El Camino Real,
to Interstate 5 south of Zone 13. Palomar Airport Road is currently
improved to six lane primary arterial standards between Avenida Encinas
and Yarrow Drive. Between Yarrow Drive and El Camino Real the road
Zone 13 LJMP 85 October I995
exists as four lanes. West of Avenida Encinas the road exists as two lanes.
C. Paseo Del Norte
Paseo Del Norte is currently a four lane secondary arterial which parallels
Interstate 5 to the east and extends from Cannon Road south to Poinsettia
Lane.
d. Leg0 DriveIArmada Drive
Leg0 Drive/Armada Drive is a hture Circulation Element Road which will
extend from Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road through Zone 13.
Drive Leg0 Drive will begin at Cannon Road and will change names to
Armada Drive southward from the point it intersects with Leg0 Drive
leading to the Leg0 project site, as shown on Exhibit 32 on page 87. The
City has determined that with the addition of Lego/Armada Drive, Hidden
Valley Road/Kelly Drive north of Palomar Airport Road will no longer be
needed. Hidden Valley Road will instead serve as a service entrance to the
Leg0 Family Park project site.
e. College Boulevard
College Boulevard is currently a four lane major arterial through Zone 5
between Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Eventually it will
extend northerly through Zones 7, 14 and 15 to an existing interchange
with State Route 78.
The existing circulation roadway network is shown on Exhibit 32 on page 87.
2. Tdentlficatlonacted R-rsectio nS
As stated in the performance standard, impacted road segments and intersections
are those that have 20% or more of the Zone 13 traffic using them. Exhibits 33
and 34 on pages 71 and 89 show the estimated percentage of traffic leaving Zone
13, impacted road segments and intersections for the year 2000 and build out under
the proposed land use conditions.
Zone 13 LFMP 86 October 1995
LEGEND
h\y. Zone 13
Existing Roadways
Proposed Roadways
Hofman Planning A~A s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - Existing Circulation
EXHIBIT32
a7
0 0
9 LEGEND
h\y. Zone 13
Existing Roadways
Proposed Roadways
Trip Distribution Percentage
1-1
a Hofman Planning Zone 13 - 2000 Circulation Trip Distribution
-AS s o c i at e s EXHIBIT33
aa
LEGEND
LFJ. Zone 13
Existing Roadways
Proposed Roadways
Trip Distribution Percentage
Hofman Planning Zone 13 - Buildout Circulation Trip Distribution
U~ssociates EXHIBIT 34
89
The road segments and intersections that are impacted by Zone 13 are as follows:
Road Segment Circulation Element
Road Classification
Cannon Road
1-5 N/B Ramp - Paseo Del Norte Major Arterial
Paseo Del Norte - Lego Drive
West of El Camino Real
Major Arterial
Major Arterial
Lego/Armada Drive
Cannon Road - Palomar AirDon Road Secondarv Arterial
Palomar Airport Road
1-5 NIB Ramp - Paseo Del None
Paseo Del None - Armada Drive
Armada Drive - College Blvd.”
Paseo Del Norte
Cannon Road - Car Country Drive
Car Country Drive - Palomar Airport Road
Prime Arterial
Prime Arterial
Prime Arterial
Secondary Arterial
Secondary Arterial
Intersections
Cannon Road/l-5 Southbound Off Ramp
Cannon Road/I-5 Southbound On Ramp
Cannon Road/l-5 Northbound Off Ramp
Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound On Ramp
El Camino ReaKannon Road
Cannon Road/Faraday Avenue
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road
Car Country Drive/Cannon Road
Armada Drivel Price Club Driveway/Palomar
Airport Road
Palomar Airport Road/[-5 Southbound Off Ramp
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Southbound On Ramp
Palomar -Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Off Ramp
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound On Ramp
Paseo del NorteXannon Road
Paseo del None/Palomar Airport Road
Leg0 DriveKannon Road
Hidden Valley Road/Palomar Airport Road
lo The KAKU traffic study analyzes the road segment from College Boulevard to Camino Vida Roble
which is equivalent to an analysis of this road segment per Brian Mayeda, report preparer. The
segments east of College Boulevard are not impacted by Zone 13 and therefore are not included in
this chapter.
Zone I3 LFMP 90 October 1995
B. PHASING
The traffic analysis prepared by KAKU Associatzs is a detailed study dealing with the
specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 13. This study analyzes the
impacts of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections impacted by
Zone 13. The traffic analysis uses the proposed roadway system and intersection
geometries for existing conditions and the years 2000 and build out as outlined in the City
of Carlsbad's Arterial Phasing Plan. The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure
conformance with the adopted performance standard through build out of Zone 13.
The purpose of the analysis contained in the KAKU Associates report and this LFMP is
to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 13 and propose
mitigation if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance
standard. For the analysis, a yearly phasing schedule is assumed for development in ZOni:
13. Based on those assumptions, a year is estimated when the facility improvements wiii
be needed (e.g. year 1998 or 2000).
Although the KAKU Associates report identifies benchmark years for improvements based
on the assumed phasing schedule, the mitigation conditions should not be specifically tied
to a year since construction of improvements will be triggered by the rate at which
development actually occurs in the hture as monitored yearly. The mitigation conditions
can, however, be generally broken down into the following categories:
Improvements needed now
Interim Year Improvements
Improvements needed by 2010/Build Out
The schedule noted above shall not limit needed traffic improvements to the years
mentioned. The time increments are used more as bench marks than actual completion
dates. The actual timing for construction of these improvements will be dictated by the
rate at which development in Zone 13 and the surrounding region occurs in the future.
The rate of development and associated traffic impacts on the road network will be
monitored on an annual basis to determine the exact timing for road improvements needed
to serve Zone 13. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary
improvements needs to be accelerated, the required improvements must also be adjusted
to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained.
1. ersec tiow
Existing peak hour counts for study intersections and road segments were provided
by the City'of Carlsbad. Since the data was from 1992, 1993, and 1994, an
incremental regional growth rate was applied to data from the years 1992 and 1993
to arrive at existing traffic counts. The years 2000 and build out were evaluated
Zone 13 LFMP 91 October 1995
using data developed from the SANDAGKity of Carlsbad computer traffic forecast
model for these years.
Peak hour analyses were utilized to determine the operating conditions of road
segments. An assumption was made, based on existing peak hour and daily
volumes, that peak hour volumes represent 10 percent of daily volumes. Once a
peak hour volume is established, it is divided by the number of lanes to determine
the peak hour volumes per lane. Each lane is assumed to have an hourly volume
capacity of 1,800 vehicles per hour.
The Level of Service is determined by taking the peak hour volume per lane and
dividing it by the 1,800 vehicle per lane per hour figure to arrive at a volume to
capacity ratio. The volume to capacity ratio is then measured against Level of
Service Definitions as set forth in the Transportation Research Board's Highway
Capacity manual. Potential Levels of Service range from A through F with the
lowest volume to capacity ratios in the "A" (Excellent) range and the highest
volume to capacity ratios in the "F" (Failure) range.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments
affected by the traffic generated from Zone 13. In accordance with the adopted
performance standard, the existing and proposed traffic facilities within and surrounding
Zone 13 will be identified by an evaluated level of service. The performance standard
determines that during peak hours a level of service A-D as acceptable and a level of
service of E or worse to be unacceptable. If a facility is determined to fail to meet the
standard. a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an
acceptable level of service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more
thoroughly later in this report.
Traffic conditions for existing, 2000 and build out are shown below. The level of service
for impacted roadways and intersections are indicated and, if needed, recommended
circulation improvement needs are identified.
Exlstlnp Traffic Vobes and C;aDacitv .. 1.
The existing roadway volumes and capacity of impacted road segments are as
follows :
Zone 13 LFMP 92 October 1995
Existing - Impacted Road Segments
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Capacity Roadway Dir. (VPHPL)ll Vol v/c LOS Vol v/c LOS
Cannon Road
1-5 - Paseo Del WB 3,600 912 .25 A 379 .ll A
None EB 3,600 309 .09 A 624 .17 A
Paseo del None - WB 3,600 NA'* NA NA NA NA NA
Leg0 Drive EB 3,600 NA NA NA NA NA NA
West of El WB 3,600 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Camino Real EB 3.600 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lego/Armada Drive
Cannon Road - NB 3,600 NA NA NA NA NA NA
PalomarAirpon SB 3,600 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Road
Palomar Aimn Road
~~~~ ~~ ~
1-5 - Paseo del WB 5,400 1,058 .20 A 1,058 .20 A
None EB 5,400 848 .16 A 1,846 .34 A
Paseo del Norte - WB 5,400 1,668 .31 A 974 .18 A
Armada Drive EB 5,400 732 .14 A 1,700 .31 A
ArmadaDrive- WB 5,400 599 .ll A 1,640 .30 A
College Blvd. l3 EB 5,400 1.220 .23 A 860 .16 A
Paseo del Norte
Cahnon Road - NB 3,600 85 0.02 A 530 0.15 A
CarcountryDr. SB 3,600 580 0.16 A 185 0.05 A
CarC0~nVyDr.- NB 3,600 200 0.06 A 330 0.09 A
PalomarAirport SB 3,600 420 0.12 A 395 0.11 A
Road e
(VPHPL) = vehicles per hour per lane. Capacity based on 1,800 vehicles per lane per hour II
NA = Not constructd. 12
l3 The KAKU traffic study analyzes the road segment from College Boulevard to Camino Vi& Roble
which is equivalent in traffic volume and capacity to the analysis from Armada Drive to College
Boulevard. pet rcport prcparer Brian Mayeda. The segments east of College Boulevard are not
impactedby Zone 13.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 93
As indicated, all road segments impacted by Zone 13 currently meet the
performance standard of level of service I'D" for street segments during the peak
hour.
The existing intersection level of service for impacted intersections are as follows:
Existing - Impacted Signalized Intersections
Location AM LOS PM LoS
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps
Paseo del None/Palomar Airport Road
Car Country Drive/Cannon Road
Armada DrivelPrice Club Driveway/Palomar Airport Road
Hidden Valley Road/Palomar Airport Road
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real/Cannon Road
Cannon/Faraday
Leg0 Drive/Cannon Road
A
A
A
NA"
A
NA"
A
NA
NA
NA
A
B
A
NA
A
NA
A
NA
NA
NA
~~
'' Ninety degree two legged intersection; LOS not applicable.
NA = Not constructed. IS
Zone I3 w;MP 94 October 1995
Existing - Impacted StopControlled Intersections
Location Movement AM LoS PM LoS
Cannon Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps SB LT
SB RT
WB LT
Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps NB LT
NB RT
EB LT
Paseo del None/Cannon Road NB LT
NB RT
WB LT
E
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
E
A
B
D
A
A
The 1-5 Ramps at Cannon Road are not within the City of Carlsbad's jurisdiction,
however, Carlsbad's adopted Capital Improvement Program has scheduled TIF and
PFF funds for the City's share of the improvements to the ramps. The timing for
these improvements is controlled by CalTrans, the responsible jurisdiction for
completing the work. This dedication of funds guaranteed the specific
improvement needed to bring this intersection into conformance with the City's
adopted performance standard. With these improvements, all intersections will
operate at an acceptable Level-of-Service.
2. Circulation Immo vements Needed For Year 2000
For the year 2000 analysis, the KAKU report analyzed the need for construction
of Cannon Road from the eastern zone boundary to El Camino Real. The analysis
indicates that if improvements are made at the intersection of Palomar Airport
Road and College Boulevard, the extension of Cannon Road to El Camino Real
will not be necessary until prior to build out. The following tables indicate the
projected level of service for the impacted road segments and intersections if
Cannon Road is not extended in the year 2000:
Zone 13 w;MP 95 October 1995
Year 2000 - Impacted Road Segments wlo Cannon Road extension to El Camino Real
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Capacity Roadway Dir cVpHpL)l6 VOl v/c Los VOl v/c Los
Cannon Road
1-5 - Paseo Del WB 3,600 461 .13 A 1,683 .47 A
None EB 3,600 1.192 .33 A 816 .23 A
Paseo del None - WB 3,600 219 .06 A 1,017 .28 A
Leg0 Drive EB 3,600 4% .14 A 429 .12 A
West of El Camino WB NA" NA NA NA NA NA NA
Real EB NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Leg0 Drive
Cannon Road - NB 3,600 30 0.01 A 685 0.19 A
Armada Drive SB 3.600 295 0.08 A 180 0.05 A
Armada Drive
Leg0 Drive - NB 3,600 870 0.24 A 490 0.14 A
Palomar Airport Rd SB 3,600 215 0.06 A 735 0.20 A
Palomar Airport Road
1-5 - Paseo del WB 5,400 1,436 .27 A 3,069 '.57 A
None EB 5,400 1,763 .33 A 1,798 .33 A
Paseo del None - WB 5,400 1,587 .29 A 3.071 .57 A
Armada Drive EB 5,400. 2,377 .44 A 1.854 .34 A
Armada Drive - WB 5,400 1,053 .20 A 1,%5 .36 A
College Blvd. I* EB 5.400 1.313 .24 A 1.236 .23 A
Paseo del None
Cannon Road - NB 3,600 165 0.05 A 600 0.17 A car country Dr. SB 3,600 635 0.18 A 365 0.10 A
Car Country Dr.- NB 3.600 495 0.14 A 680 0.19 A
A 810 0.23 A a
(VPHPL) = vehicles per hour per lane. Capacity based on 1,800 vehicles per lane per hour. 16
NA = Not constructed. 17
The KAKU traffic study analyzes the road segment from College Boulevard to Camino Vi& Roble
which is equivalent in capacity and volume to an analysis of the segment from Armada Drive to
College Boulevard. per report preparer Brian Mayeda. The segments east of College Boulevard are
not impacted by Zone 13.
18
Zone 13 LFMP 96 October 1995
It is anticipated that Cannon Road between 1-5 and Car Country Drive will require
an additional lane in the westbound direction for a total of three westbound lanes.
The above analysis also assumes that Cannon Road is constructed to two lanes in
each direction from Car Country Drive to the eastern zone boundary concurrent
with development in Zone 13. Armada' Drivekgo Drive from Cannon Road to
Palomar Airport Road is also assumed to be constructed concurrent with
development in the zone. As indicated, with these improvements, the road
segments impacted by Zone 13 meet all performance standards.
The intersection level of service for impacted intersections in the year 2000,
without the extension of Cannon Road, are shown on the following table:
Year 2000 - Impacted Intersections w/o Cannon Road extension
Location AMLoS PMLoS
Cannon Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps A A
Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps A D
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps A A
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps A F
Paseo del NortelCannon Road A. C
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road C D
Car Country Drive/Cannon Road A A
Lego Drive/Cannon Road A A
Armada Drive/Price Club Driveway/Palomar Airport Road A C
Hidden Valley Road/Palomar Airport Road
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real/Cannon Road
B C
C F
NAI9 NA
Cannon Road /Faraday Avenue NA NA
For the above analysis, it is assumed that the intersection of Paseo del
Norte/Cannon Road is signalized and that an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared
throughkight-turn lane are provided in the southbound direction. In the
northbound direction, a left-turn lane and restriping for an exclusive right-turn lane
for a shared throughhight-turn lane are required. In the westbound direction, a
The KAKU traffic study analyzes the road segment from College Boulevard to Camino Vida Roble
which is equivalent in volume and capacity to an analysis of the segment from ArmaddLego Drive
to College Boulevard, per report preparer Brian Mayeda.
21
October 1995 Zone I3 LFMP !I7
shared throughhight-turn lane is required and in the eastbound direction a left turn
lane is required.
At Car Country Drive/Cannon Road, it is assumed that the intersection is
signalized and that an exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes in the
westbound direction are provided. In the northbound direction, an exclusive right-
turn lane is assumed.
The analysis also assumes that the following improvements are made:
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road - Provide a westbound exclusive' right-turn
lane.
o Drive/Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal. Provide two left-turn lanes and
an exclusive right-turn lane in the northbound direction; two through' lanes and an
exclusive right-turn lane in the eastbound direction; and two left-turn lanes and two
through lanes in the westbound direction.
da Dri ve/Palomar Aim - Installation of traffic signal modifications.
Restripe the northbound approach for two left-turn lanes and a shared
throughhight-turn lane. In the southbound direction, provide two left-turn lanes,
one shared throughhight-turn lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane. Also, add an
eastbound left-turn lane and a westbound exclusive right-turn lane.
Hidden Valley Road /Palomar Airport Road - Construction of intersection to
include two through lanes, one shared righthhrough lane and one left turn lane in
the eastbound and westbound directions. Provide one shared southbound
left/right/through lane. Provide a shared right-turdthrough lane and one left-turn
lane in the northbound direction.
As indicated in the above analysis, if Cannon Road is not extended to El Camino
Real, two additional intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels
of service in the year 2000. In order to operate at acceptable levels, the
westbound leg of the Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps should be
restriped for the following: two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right turn lane.
In addition, the southbound leg of the College BoulevardlPalomar Airport Road
intersection should be restriped to provide the following: one left-turn lane, one
shared throughlright-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. Also, in the
northbound direction, two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one shared
throughhight-turn lane should be provided.
'
If Cannon Road is extended from Leg0 Drive to El Camino Real by the year
2000, then the improvements to Palomar Airport Road/I-5 and College
Zone 13 LFMP 98 October 1995
Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road are not required. However, based on the KAKU
Associates report, other improvements would instead be required in addition to
those assumed, as follows:
- Restripe the westbound leg of the Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps,
widen the northbound ramps and provide the following: one through lane,
one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
- Restripe the Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps in the
At College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road, provide two left-turn lanes,
westbound direction to provide the following: two through lanes, one
shared throughlright-turn lane, and one exclusive right turn lane.
one through lane, and one shared throughhight-turn lane in the northbound
direction. Restripe the southbound approach for a left-turn lane, a shared
througwright-turn lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane.
-
- At El Camino ReaUCannon Road, construct this intersection to provide
three through lanes, one exclusive right-turn, and two exclusive left-turn
lanes in the southbound direction, provide two through lanes, one shared
througwright-turn lane, and two exclusive left-turn lanes in the northbound
direction. In the eastbound direction, provide one through lane, one shared
through/right-turn lane and two exclusive left-turn lanes. In the westbound
direction, provide one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and two exclusive left-turn lanes. Install a traffic signal.
With the above mitigation measures, all intersections impacted by Zone 13 in 2000
are projected to meet the performance standard.
Out Condm .. 3.
Future long-term traffic volumes at build out of the City were provided by
SANDAG in their "City of Carlsbad Year 2010 General Plan Traffic Forecast",
(February, 1994). The KAKU Associates report assumes that Cannon Road will
be constructed to El Camino Real prior to Build Out. With construction of Cannon
Road, the Build Out projected roadway volumes and capacity of impacted road
segments are as follows:
Zone 13 LFMP 99 October 1995
Buildout - Impacted Road Segments
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Capacity Roadway Dir. (VPHPL)zo Vol v/c LOS Vol VIC LOS
Cannon Road
1-5 - Paseo Del WB 3,600 1,169 .32 A 2,662 .74 C
None EB 3.600 2,367 .66 B 2,100 .58 A
Paseo del None - WB 3,600 1,068 .30 A 1.809 SO A
Leg0 Drive EB 3.600 1,587 .44 A 1,640 .46 A
West of El WB 3.600 2,286 .64 B 1,378 .38 A
Camino Real EB 3,600 1,712 .48 A 936 .26 A
Leg0 Drive
Cannon Road - NB 3,600 105 0.03 A 1,525 0.42 A
Armada Drive SB 3.600 1,280 0.36 A 655 0.18 A
Armada Drive
Leg0 Drive - NB 3,600 945 0.26 A 305 0.08 A
PalornarAirpon SB 3.600 390 0.11 A 960 0.27 A Rd
Palornar Airport Road
1-5 - Paseo del WB 5,400 1,752 .32 A 3.544 .66 B
None EB 5.400 2,548 .47 A 1,800 .33 A
Paseo del None - WB 5.400 1,611 .30 A 3,309 .61 B
Armada Drive EB 5,400 3,173 .59 A 1.800 .33 A
Armada Drive - WB 5,400 NIU NI NI N1 NI NI
College Ave" EB 5,400 NI NI NI NI NI NI
Paseo Del None
Cannon Road - NB 3,600 275 0.08 A 670 0.19 A
car counuy SB 3,600 875 0.24 A 425 0.12 A
Drive
car counuy NB 3,600 330 0.09 A 550 0.15 A
Drive-Palomar SB 3.600 615 0.17 A 840 0.23 A
Airport Road
(VPHPL) = vehicles per hour per lane. Capacity based on 1,800 vehicles per lane per hour. 20
The KAKU traffic study analyzes the road segment from College Boulevard to Camino Vida Roble
which is equivalent in volume and capacity to an analysis of the segment from Armada/Lego Drive
to College Boulevard; per report preparer Brian Mayeda.
NI = Not Impacted.
21
Zone 13 LFMP 100 October 1995
As shown above, with the construction of Cannon Road to El Camino Real. the
projected road segments impacted by Zonc 13 at build out meet all performance
standards.
The intersection level of service for impacted intersections at build out are the
following :
Buildout - Impacted Intersections
Location AMLOS PMLoS
Cannon Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps
Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Southbound Ramps
C
A
F
A
Palomar Airport Road/[-5 Northbound Ramps B F
Paseo del Norte/Cannon Road E F
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road E E
Car Country DriveKannon Road A B
Leg0 Drive/Cannon Road B D
Armada DrivelPrice Club Driveway/Palomar Airport Road A D
Hidden Valley Road/Palomar Airport Road B C
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road NIZ’ NI
El Camino ReallCannon Road F D
Cannon Road /Faraday Avenue A B
For the above analysis, it is assumed that the ramp is widened with an exclusive
right-turn lane provided in the northbound direction at the Cannon Road/I-5
Northbound Ramps. It is also assumed that an eastbound exclusive right-turn lane
is provided at the Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road intersection. The
intersection of Cannon Road/El Camino Real is assumed to be signalized and
improved to the level described under the Year 2000 scenario conditions with
Cannon Road extended.
As shown above, in addition to the assumed improvements five intersections are
anticipated to require mitigation to operate at acceptable levels at build out. These
improvements are as follows:
23 NI = Not Impacted
101 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
n Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road
approach to provide one through lane, one shared througwright-turn lane. and one
exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an additional eastbound Cannon
road left-turn lane.
Palomar Airport/I-5 Northbo und Ramps - Restripe the westbound approach for two
through lanes, one shared through/right-turn lane and one exclusive right turn.
Paseo del NorteK- - Construction of an additional eastbound left-turn
lane for a total of two exclusive left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one
throughhight-turn lane. In addition, at a point east of the intersection, an
additional westbound Cannon Road through lane would be required. At the
intersection, this would result in the following lane configuration in the westbound
direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared
throughhight-turn lane.
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound and southbound
Paseo del Norte approaches to provide two exclusive left-turn lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
1 - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real approach
to provide for one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared throughkight turn
lane, and on exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an exclusive right-turn
lane on the eastbound Cannon road approach. (Note: these improvements are in
addition to those assumed to be completed for the Year 2000 with Cannon Road
Extended conditions. )
With these improvements, all intersections impacted by Zone 13 at build out are
projected to meet the performance standard.
111. MITIGATION
Special Conditiom: ..
The proposed mitigation is divided into the categories established under the phasing portion of this
section. It should be understood that all cost estimates presented in this plan are preliminary in
nature and will need further refinement as the actual scope of work, utility needs and right-of-way
dedications are determined.
A. A portion of Zone 13 is included in the proposed Cannon Road (west) Fee Program. That
portion required to participate in the proposed fee program is identified in the fee study
dated August 1994 contained in Appendix A-5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for
any project required to participate in fee program, the applicant shall pay the fee as
determined for that project in the Cannon Road West Fee Program.
Zone 13 LFMP 102 October 1995
B. The following improvements are anticipated to be required during the build out of Zone
13, Prior to development within each of the identified General Plan land use sub-areas.
if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, the construction of the following
circulation improvements shall be financially guaranteed, as set forth in the finance chapter
of this plan:
1. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED NOW
a. Cannon Road/I -5 Northbound and Southbo und Ramps
Install traffic signals. Also, at the Southbound Ramps widen the ramps and
add a southbound left-turn lane. Restripe the westbound through lane for
an additional left-turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $232,000
The 1-5 Ramps at Cannon Road are not within the City of Carlsbad's
jurisdiction, however, Carlsbad's adopted Capital Improvement Program
has scheduled TIF and PFF funds for the City's share of the improvements
to the ramps. The timing for these improvements is controlled by
CalTrans, the responsible jurisdiction for completing the work. This
dedication of funds guaranteed the specific improvement needed to bring
this intersection into conformance with the City's adopted Performance
standard. For these reasons, no further action is required prior to
development within Zone 13.
2. INTERIM YEAR IMPROVEMENTS
a. n Road from 1-5 to Car Country Drive
Add an additional westbound through lane for a total of three westbound
lanes.
- $150,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3, O/PI-1, 0-PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Zone 13 LFMP 103 October 1995
b. Cannon Road from Car Countrv Dri ve to the eastern Zone Boundary
Construction of Cannon Road to two lanes in each direction.
Estimated Cost - $8,467,000
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3, O/PI-1, or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
C. da Dr ive/Ixgo Dri ve from won Road to Palomar Aimort Road
Construction of Armada Drivekgo Drive to two lanes in each direction.
Estimated Cost - $2,573,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-2. TR-3,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2, TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines
that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
d. @ - Install Traffic Signal. Also, provide an
exclusive left-turn lane and a shared throughkight-turn lane in the
southbound direction. In the northbound direction, add a left-turn lane and
restripe the exclusive right-turn lane for a shared throughhight-turn lane.
Also, add an eastbound left-turn lane and westbound shared throughlright-
turn lane.
- $169,000
Zone 13 LFMP 104 October 1995
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2.
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
e. Car Country Drive/Cuon Road - Install Traffic Signal. Provide an
exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes in the westbound direction.
In the northbound direction, add an exclusive right-turn lane.
d CO&- $1 10,OOO
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
- Provide a .westbound exclusive Paseo del NortelPalomar A' mort Road
right-turn lane.
f.
ed Cog - $185,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3, O/PI-2,
TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
g. o Dri ve/Cmn Road - Install traffic signal. Provide two left-turn lanes
and an exclusive right-turn lane in the northbound direction; two through
lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane in the eastbound direction; and two
left-turn lanes and two through lanes in the westbound direction.
d Cost - $5,000
Zone I3 LFMP 105 October 1995
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
TR-3, O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard. the developer of that subarea shall
financially guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of
this plan.
h. Armada Dr ive/Palomr Aimort RoA - Install traffic signal modifications
as necessary. Restripe the northbound approach for two left-turn lanes and
a shared throughhight-turn lane. In the southbound direction, provide two
left-turn lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and an exclusive right-
turn lane. Also, add an eastbound left-turn lane and a westbound exclusive
right-turn lane.
ted Cost - $205,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea O/PI-2, TR-3
or TR/C of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this improvement
is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its
construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
1. Hidden Valley Road/Palomarort Rod - Construction of intersection
to include two through lanes, one shared right/through lane and one left
turn lane in the eastbound and westbound directions. Provide one shared
southbound left/right/through lane. Provide a shared right-turdthrough
lane and one left-turn lane in the northbound direction.
- $155,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea O/PI-2, TR-3
or TFUC of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this improvement
is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its
construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
106 October 1995 Zone 13 w;MP
j. One of the following two groups of improvements dependent upon whether
Cannon Road is constructed between Zone 13 and El Camino Real:
.. Conditions if Cannon Road is not Ex tended:
1. Palomar Airport Road /I-5 Northbound Ram - Restripe the
westbound Palomar Airport Road approach for the following: two
through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive
right-turn lane.
Estimated Cos1 - $1,725
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea O/PI-2, TR-3, TR/C or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Colleee Boule vard/-r mort Road - Provide two left-turn
lanes, one through lane, and one shared. throughhight-turn lane in
the northbound direction. Restripe the southbound College
Boulevard approach for the following: one left-turn lane, one
shared throughiright-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
.. 11.
- $1,150
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, TR-3,O/PI-l , O/PI-2, TR/C or R of Zone 13,
if the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary
to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Cond&ms if Cmon Road is Extended: ..
1. -on RdII-5 Northbo- - Widen the northbound on
ramps and restripe the westbound Cannon Road approach to provide
107 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one
exclusive right-turn lane.
Estimated Cost - $1,150
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit. whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, O/PI-l, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City
Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain
the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction'
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
.. 11. Palomar Airport Road /I-5 Noabound Ram - Restripe the westbound Palomar Airport Road approach to provide two through
lanes, one shared throughlright-turn lane, and one exclusive right
turn lane.
ted Cost - $1,725
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-3, O/PI-2, TWC or R of Zone 13. if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Collw Boulevard /Palow Airport Road - Provide two left-turn
lanes, one through lane, and one shared throughkight lane in the
northbound direction. Restripe the southbound approach for a left-
turn lane, a through lane and a shared throughhight-turn lane
... 111.
mt - $1,150
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-3, O/PI-2, TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the
Zone I3 w;MP 108 October 1995
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the
developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee its construction
as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
iv. Cannon Road from eastern Zwe boundarv to El Cam' in0 Red
Construction of Cannon Road to two lanes in each direction.
ted Cos? -$3,247,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, TR-3, O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the
City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to
maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
"&no Real/C- - Provide three through lanes, one
ive right-turn, and two exclusive left-turn lanes in the
s,~ und direction. Provide two through lanes, one shared
thro: ieht-turn lane, and two exclusive left-turn lanes in the
nom* 1 direction. In the eastbound direction, provide one
through lane, one shared througwright-turn lane and two exclusive
left-turn lanes. In the westbound direction, provide one through
lane, one shared througwright-turn lane, and two exclusive left-turn
lanes. Install a traffic signal.
ted Cost - $340,000
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within
subarea TR-1, TR-2, TR-3, O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the
City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to
maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially guarantee
its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
Zone 13 LFMP 109 October 1995
3. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BY BUILD OUT
a. Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound R amD s - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road approach to provide one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn
lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, widen the on ramp and
provide an additional eastbound Cannon Road left-turn lane. Also. widen
the off ramp and add a northbound exclusive right-turn lane.
ed Cost - $4,600
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1 , O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
b. Airport/1-5 No- - Restripe the westbound approach
for two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane and one exclusive
right turn.
ted Cost - $1,725
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3, O/PI-2,
TR/C or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
c. Paseo delon Road - Construction of an additional eastbound
left-turn lane for a total of two exclusive left-turn lanes, one through lane,
and one througwright-turn lane. In addition, at a point east of the
intersection, an additional westbound Cannon Road through lane would be
required. At the intersection, this would result in the following lane
configuration in the westbound direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and a shared throughlright-turn lane.
d Cost - $27,000
Zone 13 UMP 110 October 1995
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2.
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
d. Paseo del NortelPahar Aimort Road - Restripe the northbound and
southbound Paseo del Norte approaches to provide two exclusive left-turn
lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
Provide an eastbound exclusive right-turn lane.
- $2,300
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-3, O/PI-2,
TWC or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
e. E1 Camino Real/Cwn Road - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real
approach to provide for two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, one shared
throughjright turn lane, and on exclusive right-turn lane. In addition,
provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound Cannon Road
approach. [Note: Improvements listed in condition 2.i.v (Cannon Road
extended), may be built prior to the above improvements. If they are not
built, they must be constructed with the above improvements.)
ed Cost - $6,325
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2,
O/PI-1, O/PI-2 or R of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
f. n Zone boundu to El Camlno Real
Zone 13 LFMP 111 October 1995
Construction of Cannon Road to full major arterial standards from the
eastern Zone boundary to El Camino Real.
Estimated Cost - $3,247,000
Timing:
Prior to recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first for any project within subarea TR-1, TR-2.
O/PI-1 or O/PI-2 of Zone 13, if the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of that subarea shall financially
guarantee its construction as set forth in the Finance section of this plan.
IV. FINANCING
Exhibit 35 on page 113 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes
the individual project to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing
budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options.
Zone 13 LFMP 112 October I995
. .- . E<'> __
ZONE 13 . CIRCULATION FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1/1/95
Cannon Rd eastern zone bound to El Camino Real
'Tot@ Circulation costs wio Cannon ~0.d
ITotaI Circulation Costs with Camon Road
AClLlTY
. Improvements Needad Now
5 NE & SB ramps
wgnals and improvements 1-5 southbound ofl.ramp
. Interim Year fmprovemmncs
annon Road
1-5 IO Car Countrv Drive
Car Countrv Or . east zone bound
rrnadarLego Orwe Cannon Rd Palomar Airoort Rd
aseo del NoftelCannon Rd
sognals and improvements
ar Countrv Dr.1Cannon Rd. slgnals and improvements
aseo Del NorteiPalomar Airport Rd turn lane
ego DriveiCannon Rd signals and improvements
rmada DrivelPalornar Airport Rd. signals and improvements
ldden ValleyiPalomar Airport Ad
intersection construction
WIO Cannon Road Extmnaion
Palomar Alrport Rdll-5 Northbound Ramp
- Restriping
College BlvdlPalomar A#rport Rd
Restriping
With Cannon Road Eatemion
Cannon Rdll.5 Northbound Ramp . Restrlpmg
Palomar Atrport Adil-5 Northbound Ramp
Restriping
College ElvdiPalornaf Atrport Rd
Restriping
Cannon Road
Eastern zone bound. El Camino Real
El Camino RealiCannon Rd
Sfgnal and tmprovements
Improvements Needad a1 Build OuI
annon Rdol.5 Northbound Ramp
Restrtpmg
Ilomar Anrporl Rdll-5 Northbound Ramp
Restriping
iseo Del NortetCannon Rd
Lane construction. east and wesI
iseo Del NortegPalomar Airport Rd ReStrWng
El Camino Reahcannon Rd , - Restripmg
915,~z.m
919.130.975
AMOUNT
2 LS
1 lane
4 lanes
4 lanes
1 LS
1 LS
1 lane
1 LS
1 LS
1 inter.
nia
nla
nia
n1a
nia
4 Lanes
1 LS
nia
nla
2
Lanes
nla
nla
4
Lanes
ESTIMATED
COST
1232.000
5 150.000
$8.467.000
12.573.000
11 69.000
$1 10.000
$185.000
$5.000
$205.000
5155.000
$1.725
11,150
$1.150
$1.725
$1,150
5 3.247.0DO
$340.000
$4.600
$1.725
$27.000
S2.300
$6.325
$3.247.000
llMlNG 11)
FUNDING OPTlOP FIRST
C~tv . PFFiTlF
C>tv - PFF'TIF
TIFiCFD a3
ZFD Xl ITransnetiCFD r3iFee Prop
CFD X3
PFFiDevelooer
Developer
CFD N3
CFD 13
CFD 13
CFD 13
Developer
Developer
TlFlOeveloper
Developer
Developer
TransnetiCFDNll
Fee Pgm /Developer
TlFiPFFiDeveloper
TlFtPFFlDeveloper
Developer
Developer
Developer
Developer
TransnetiCFDRl I ~~~ .~
Fee Pgm IDeveloDer
SECOND
)eveloper
)eveloper
Notes 1 The timeframer for these omprovemenis are generallv grouped as needed now.
under mterim conditions. and at build out Actual timing
wdf vary dependent upon the rate of development within Zone 13 and
the surrounding region See text of Caculation chapter for a detailed
explanation of phasing assumptions and benchmark years
2 The hrst development directly impacting the respective IaciIiIies
as determined by the City Engineer. shall construct the needed improvements
The C~ty shall be guaranteed 01 this construction by impo%ng apDroDriate conditions on the applicable tentative map The dcveloper(sl may be eligible IO recaive
lee credit or rembursemsnt for costs directly related to the construction of
mprovements to the extent that lunds are avadable from future Public Facility Fee IPFFI and Traffic Impact Fee ITIF) revenues The schedule for
reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital Improvement Rogrrm
-
OTES -
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 - -
113
This page intentionally Left Blank
Zone I3 LFMP 114 October 1995
FIRE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No more than 1500 dwelling units outside of a five minute response time.
A. Zone 13 is comprised exclusively of nonresidential uses. Since it does not include any
residential uses, the performance standard does not apply. The Growth Management
Program does not identify a fire-service performance standard for nonresidential uses.
The Citywide facilities and improvement plans identified the need for six fire stations to
service the City through buildout. All six stations are in operation. Two stations will be
relocated in the future to optimize response times. At this time, it is not anticipated that
additional stations will be needed.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. INVENTORY
At the present time Fire Station No. 4 serves Zone 13. Fire Station No. 4 is located at
6885 Batiquitos Road, and is shown on Exhibit 36 on page 116. This exhibit also shows
the five minute fire response time within this area. A 30 mph average driving rate is used
to determine the five minute response time. The five minute response time begins when
the fire truck leaves the fire station. This is equivalent to a 2.5 mile driving distance from
the fire station.
B. PHASING
Based on the phasing program that has been developed for Zone 13, future projects will
create an average of 226,562 square feet of additional development per year. This will
result in an increased work-force population of 416 people on an annual basis.
At build out of Zone 13, there will be approximately 3,398,430 square feet of non-
residential development. If a ratio of one employee per 544 square feet is used, the
buildout square footage corresponds to a potential workday population of 6,247
employees.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Existing fire facilities will adequately serve Zone 13 through buildout.
Zone 13 LFMP 115 October 1995
Oceanside
LEGEND 11. Fire Station Location l;-'l Five Minute Response Area - Station #2 - IJ '1 Five Minute Response Area - Station #4 I-! dl Five Minute Response Area - Station #5
I
3 Encinitas
Hofman Planning
Associates
Zone 13 -Fire Response Time
EXHIBIT36
116
111. MITIGATION
SPECIAI. CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 13
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
IV. FINANCING
Non-residential development will be required to pay a Public Facilities Fee of 3.5 percent of
building valuation. This fee is collected at the time building permits are issued.
Zone 13 WMP 117 October I995
OPEN SPACE FACILITIES
I.
11.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-
developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent
with development.
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Exhibit 37 on page 119 shows graphically the existing, approved and future performance standard
open space within Zone 13.
Performance standard open space consists of 1) developed open space areas within existing and
approved projects and 2) unconstrained, undeveloped open space throughout the remainder of the
zone. Unconstrained, undeveloped open space is land that will remain as permanent open space
and is free of environmental constraints. Environmental constraints include: beaches, permanent
bodies of water, floodways, slopes greater that 40%, significant wetlands, significant riparian .
habitats, significant woodland habitats, major power line easements, railroad track beds, and other
significant environmental features as determined by the environmental review process. Slopes 25-
40% and major powerline easements that are improved for open space purposes (as permitted in
the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan) may count toward the open space
performance standard.
A. INVENTORY
1. Inventorv of ODen %ace De&:
The performance standard open space required to be provided for Zone 13 is 15
percent of the total land area that is exclusive of environmentally constrained non-
developable land. The total land area within Zone 13 that falls under this
definition is 531.33 acresz4. Zone 13's build out performance standard requirement
for open space, therefore, is 79.70 acres.
.. 2. hventorv of E-Dro ved Own SDace SUD&
An inventory of the existing and approved performance standard open space supply
is shown on Exhibit 38 on page 121 and is summarized below.
The total existing performance standard open space supply is 119.03 acres.
Therefore, the open space performance standard in Zone 13 is currently being met.
24 See Exhibit 10 on page 29.
Zone 13 L.FMP 118 October 1995
LEGEND
1\u. Performance Standard Open Space Area
Notes:
Performance Standard Open Space provided = 119.03 acres.
Excludes constraints noted in Exhibit 10 and golf course areas OS-1, OS-2 and OS4
final and is subject to change.)
Nonrm The golf course area in OS-1 is estimated at 19 net acres, however, the amount is not NOSCALE NOTE UL~TWS-WTE
Zone 13 - Performance Standard Open Space
EXHIBIT 37 44 Hofman Planning I~A s s o c i a t e s
119
3. bventorv of Future ODen %ace SUDD&:
As shown on Exhibit 38 on page 121, no additional acres of future performance
standard open space are identified within Zone 13 at this time. However, it is
likely that additional performance standard open space will become available as
future projects are identified. Not taking these future acres into consideration.
the total open space supply is 119.03 acres at build out. The build out demand for
open space is 79.70 acres. Therefore, the performance standard open space is
projected to meet the demand at build out.
B. PHASING
Existing open space supply satisfies build out open space demand. Therefore, no phasing
analysis is required. Any additional open space provided by future development will be
above and beyond the adopted performance standard.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
As of 1/1/95, Zone 13 has sufficient permanent performance standard open space to meet
the adopted performance standard through build out.
111. MITIGATION
Special Conditions ..
No special conditions.
IV. FINANCING
Funding for performance standard open space will be provided by the property owners of Zone
13. Unconstrained open space that is not developed will not require maintenance. If
unconstrained open space is developed, the funding will be provided by the developer of that open
space.
Zone 13 LFMP 120 October 1995
EXHIBIT 38
Zone 13 - LFMP Open Space Inventory - Constraints Analysis (as of 1 11 195)
79.70
General Plan
Sub-Area
11 9.03 39.33
Existing
os
Total Existing
Open Space+
Future
Non-Residential
Total Build Out
Out Open’Space
Project
Performance
Standard
Project Open Space i Number Demand
31.55
31.55
48.1 5
Performance
Standard
Open Space
SUPPlV
11 9.03
1 19.03
0.00
Adequacy1
(Inadequacy)
Open Space demand = 15% of net developable General Plan Open Space
areas OS-1 through OS-5. Open Space Supply = net acres in OS-1, OS-3
and OS-5 (does not include golf course areas OS-2 and OS-4. The golf
course area in OS-1 is estimated at 19 net acres and IS not included in the
performance standard Open Space supply. The 19 acre figure is an
estimate and is subject to change.)
Zone 13 LFMP 121 October 1995
SCHOOL FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate
school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Since Zone 13 will be entirely non-residential. the above performance standard does not apply.
However, an analysis of School Facilities is provided to show its current status within the City.
Management Zone 13 is located within the jurisdiction of the Carlsbad Unified School District
(CUSD) as shown on Exhibit 39 on page 123.
A. BUILD OUT ASSUMPTIONS
The following analysis is based on the build out projections on Exhibit 10 on page 29.
.. 1. xistiqg and Build Out POD-:
Since there is no residential development in Zone 13. no future population is
projected.
B. INVENTORY
1. Enrollment:
There is no existing enrollment within Zone 13.
Student Population at Build Out:
To project student enrollment at build out, the Carlsbad Unified School District
uses a student generation rate of 0.5 per unit. To determine the build out
population of elementary, junior high and high school students, the total number
of projected units are multiplied by the district's student generation rate.
Zone 13 LFMP 122 October 1995
Oceanside
LEGEND
rl. Carlsbad Unified School District
I
I
Vista 2,
Encinitas
I 2 I San Marcos Unified School District 131 Encinitas Union ElementaryEan Dieguito High School Districts
Hofman Planning Associates
Zone I3 - School Districts
EXHIBIT 39
The total projected students are proportionally assigned as elementary, junior high
and high school students based on the number of grades per school (K-12).
Elementary School Students:
The Carlsbad Unified School District recently adopted a new school location plan
that indicates future school locations within the district. The City of Carlsbad has
incorporated these new locations into its recently adopted General Plan update.
Junior High Students:
Valley Junior High is the only Junior High facility in the CUSD. CUSD recently
completed renovation of this school in 1992. The capacity at Valley Junior High
is now 1,056.
High School Students:
CUSD recently completed renovating Carlsbad High School to provide a capacity
of 2,500 students.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Under the Growth Management Program, a performance standard for non-residential uses
is not identified. However, a school performance standard was adopted for the non-
residential uses in Zone 5 which assumed that non-residential zones would be required to
pay a school fee based on the square footage of development. The fee is based on
legislation which determined that employees can educate their children in the same school
district in which their place of employment is located. The fee is intended to offset the
cost of the construction of school facilities required to accommodate children of parents
working within the school district.
Zone 13 is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. Applicable non-residential school
fees will be paid to 'the Carlsbad Unified School District at the time of Building Permit
issuance.
111. MITIGATION
No special conditions.
Zone 13 UMP 124 October I995
IV. FINANCING
Because Zone 13 has no residential population, and the renovations mentioned above have been
completed, the school financing matrix has been omitted from this analysis.
In August of 1990 the Board of Trustees created an alternative to fee collection by adopting a
"Facility Financing Plan". This Plan establishes a foundation for Mello-Roos bond financing to
provide funding for necessary school facilities. If the Board elects to implement the plan, the
current fee collection structure will be discontinued and replaced with an alternative financing
system.
Zone 13 LFMP 125 October 1995
Y
I.
11.
SEWER FACILITIES
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Trunk-line capacity to meet demand as caterminec
provided concurrent with development.
,,y the appropriate sewer district must be
FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: Carlsbad
Municipal Water District, Leucadia County Water District (LCWD), and Vallecitos Water
District. Zone 13 is located entirely within the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD)
service area, as shown on Exhibit 40 on page 98.
The information contained in this plan was obtained from the "City of Carlsbad Master Plan of
Sewerage" prepared by Wilson Engineering, January, 1992, and updated by CMWD.
A. INVENTORY
1.
Zone 13 is located within two major sewer drainage basins. They are the South
Agua Hedionda and the Buena/Vallecitos sewer drainage basins as shown in
Exhibit 41 on page 128.
Zone 13 is presently undeveloped farmland and contains no existing sewer
collection system. Future development in Zone 13 will sewer through either the
existing 10-inch collector sewer and its proposed extension in Cannon Road to the
north or the existing BuenaNallecitos Interceptors to the south.
a. Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer
The Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer begins at the end of the Vallecitos siphon
near the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and El Camino Real. It then
flows westerly through an industrial park. The interceptor sewer then
follows Palomar Airport Road westerly, adjacent to the Buena Interceptor
Sewer. Exhibit 42 on page 129 provides a description of the reaches and
the City of Carlsbad ownership in the Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer.
126 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
Oceanside
TI. Calavera Hills ReclamationlTreatment Facility
Encina Water Pollution Control Facility 131 Meadowlark Reclamation Facility I 4 I Gafner Wastewater Reclamation Facility
Hofman Planning Associates
Zone 13 - Sewer Districts
EXHIBIT40
LEGEND
I & 1. Basin Boundary
171 Basin Designation
. Palomar Airport Road
44 Hofman Planning A~A s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - Sewer Basin Boundaries
EXHIBIT41
128
Exhibit 42
Engineering Data for the
Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer
Full Pipe
Reach Size Slope Length Capacity
v3 30 0.67 3,260 21.7 v4 30 0.68 6,510 21.8
v5 30 0.68 1,670 21.8
V6 30 0.68 3,400 21.8
v7 39 0.16 2,130 21.3
V8 54 0.15 870 49.2
Engineering Data for the
Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor
(in.) (%) Ut.) (MGD)
Full Pipe 1 Reach Size Slope Length Capacity
(in.) (%I (ft:) (MGD)
VC1 36 0.50 6690 30.0
VC2 42 0.28 2790 34.0
VC3 36 0.20 3170 19.5
VC5 27 0.36 2500 12.0
VC6 30 0.24 1180 13.0
VC7 27 1.64 760 25.0
VC8 36 0.10 720 13.8
VC9 36 0.10 1940 13.8
VC10 36 0.10 4330 13.8
VC11 42 0.10 1370 20.5
VC13 42 0.18 3520 20.5
VC14 42 0.10 5080 20.5
VC15 42 0.12 1760 22.8
VC16 54 0.28 310 67.2
City of Carlsbad Ownership
Leased Full Pipe Full Pipe
Capacity Capacity Available Capacity (1 )
(%) (MGD) (MGD)
23.0 5.0 5 .OO
22.9 5 .O 5.00
22.9 5.0 5.00
22.9 5.0 5.00
23.5 5.0 5.00
10.2 5.0 5.00
City of Carlsbad Ownership
Full Pipe Full Pipe
Ownership Capacity Available Capacity (1 1
(%I (MGD) (MGD)
0.0 0.0 0.0
15.5 5.3 4.7
15.5 3.0 1.4
27.3 2.6 0.6
27.3 3.3 1.3
27.3 6.8 4.0
27.3 3.8 0.7
37.3 5.1 1 .o
37.3 5.1 -0.1
37.3 7.6 0.0
51.7 10.6 , 3.0
51.7 10.6 2.1
51.7 11.8 3.2
45.24 30.4 20.8
Notes: (1 1 Available capacity as of January 1, 1991
Shaded Areas indicate those lines impacted by Zone 13.
Zone I3 L FMP 129 October I995
b. South Agua Hedionda Drainage Basin
The projected build out flow for Zone 13 can be adequately handled by the
existing 10" VCP in Cannon Road. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor receives
flows from this existing 10" VCP sewer at Cannon Road and 1-5.
Construction of the future South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will not be
required to serve Zone 13 south of Cannon Road. Provided that no sewer
service is needed for those portions of Zone 13 north of and not fronting
on Cannon Road, CMWD may install portions of the interceptor sewer in
Cannon Road as part of the improvements to the area. Although not
required for Zone 13, when constructed as necessary for future
development to the east, SAH4 will intercept the 10" collector sewer and
Zone 13 will then be serviced by the SAH4 interceptor.
c. VistaKarlsbad Interceptor Sewer
The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor starts just west of College Boulevard along
Highway 78 at the Vista Meter Station. This pipeline intercepts flow from
the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer system and the 10" collector
sewer in Cannon Road. This interceptor is jointly owned by the City of
Vista and the City of Carlsbad. The City of Carlsbad ownership rights in
the interceptor increase in the direction of flow reaching greater than 50
percent ownership in the most downstream reaches of the interceptor.
Exhibit 42 on page 129 provides engineering data for the gravity portions
of this interceptor.
a. Sewer Basins
The current Sewer Master Plan shows Zone 13 to sewer into two separate
sewer basins. Basin A will feed to the 10-inch collector sewer in Cannon
Road. Basin B feeds to the existing Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer. Exhibit
41 on page 128 shows the locations of the two sewer basins.
Sewer Drainage Basin A
Future development within Zone 13 is proposed to sewer into the existing
10" pipeline located in Cannon Road. Ultimately the proposed South Agua
Hedionda Interceptor (SAHI) sewer system, to be constructed as
development to the east of Zone 13 occurs, will intercept the existing 10-
inch collector sewer.
Zone I3 LFMP 130 October 1995
Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer Drainage (Basin B)
Sewage flows tributary to Armada Crive will be intercepted by the existing
8-inch diameter sewer located at the intersection of the Price Club entrance
and Palomar Airport Road. This existing sewer will convey the flow to the
Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer. The Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer has already
been constructed to its ultimate configuration. Exhibit 43 on page 132
shows the approximate alignment of these pipelines.
The Sewer Master Plan for Carlsbad accounts for no development within
sewer drainage Basin B in Zone 13. Therefore the proposed development
within this sewer drainage basin will exceed the Plan's assumption by 859
EDU or a cumulative average flow of 0.19 MGD.
VistaKarlsbad Interceptor
Improvements will be required for the portions of the Vista/Carlsbad
Interceptor which serve Zone 13. These improvements are to be funded by
the City of Carlsbad and the City of Vista.
The existing 42-inch trunk sewer (VC14) in the railroad right-of-way from
Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road will need to be upsized to a 54-inch
trunk sewer by the year 1997. The 42-inch trunk sewer in the railroad
right-of-way from Olive to Agua Hedionda Lagoon (VCll), from Agua
Hedionda Lagoon to Cannon (VC13), and in Avenida Encinas from
Palomar Airport Road to the EWPCF entrance will all need to be upsized
to 54-inch trunk sewers by the year 2010. The Agua Hedionda Lift Station
will ultimately be relocated by the year 2010.
The following information summarizes the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor
improvements per the Master Plan of Sewerage:
Reach Size cost Year Needed
VC13 54" $1,461 .OOO 2010
VC 14 54 $ 2,108,000 I997
VC 15 54" $ 730,000 2010
Zone 13 LFMP 131 October I995
uenaNallecitos
Encina Water
LEGEND PI, Basin Boundary Fl Basin Designation VistalCarlsbad Interceptor
Direction of Flow Proposed Facility
Buena Interceptor Sewer
Ill1711 NosCAE 171 Vallecitos Interceptor Sewer l/JI Existing Facility NOlE HLLOUllWSMPROFJ1UIE
Zone 13 - Major Sewer Facilities EXHIBIT 43 44 Hofman Planning 11~ s s o c i a t e s
i
132
The location and sizes of the major sewer lines were approximated only for
the purpose of this Facilities Plan. The exact sizes and locations will be
defined as the area develops and the sewer lines are designed per the City's
current standards.
3. Build Out Assu-
For purposes of estimating the ultimate sewage that will be generated from Zone
13 into each interceptor, the build out projections for each sewer drainage basin
are estimated as follows:
Land Use EDU Basin A Basin B
Retail
Commercial
194 190 EDU 4 EDU
464 299 EDU 165EDU
HoteVRec. 1,148 458 EDU 690 EDU
4. a1 Assurnp~m
Carlsbad's current sewer Master Plan establishes unit flow generation factors as
a basis for projecting the average sewer flows. The average unit flow from the
City of Carlsbad was projected using 220 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling
unit (EDU).
.. 5. XIS-
Zone 13 is presently undeveloped farmland and contains no existing sewer
collection system. There is no existing sewer demand in Zone 13..
6. Projected Build Out Dew
The projected build out sewer flows for each sewer basin in Zone 13 can be
determined by multiplying the build out projections as established in this plan by
the average unit flow factors obtained from Carlsbad's Sewer Master Plan.
Projected Average Average Projected
Build Out X Unit Flow = Build Out Sewer
The projected build out average sewer flow for Zone 13 by sewer basin is as
follows:
133 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
BASIN A:
Land Use Projected Build Out Average Unit Flow Build Out Sewer Flow
Retail 190 EDU 220 GPD/EDU 4 1,800 GPD
Commercial 299 EDU 220 GPD/EDU 65.780 GPD
Hotel/Rec. 458 EDU 220 GPD/EDU 100.760 GPD
TOTAL 208,340 GPD
BASIN B:
Land Use Projected Build Out Average Unit Flow Build Out Sewer Flow
Retail 4 EDU 220 GPD/EDU 880 GPD
Commercial 165 EDU 220 GPDIEDU 36.300 GPD
Hotel/Rec. 690 EDU 220 GPDlEDU 151.800 GPD
TOTAL 188,980 GPD
For planning purposes, yearly sewer demand by year for each sewer basin in Zone 13 are
projected in Exhibit 44 on page 135. Detailed demands at Buildout are shown by land use
in Exhibit 45’5 on page 136 and graphically depicted in Exhibit 46 on page 138.
*’ It should be noted that the acreage figures on Exhibit 45 are from the tentative map
applications for the Specific Plan area. These numbers may vary from those shown
on Exhibit 10. The acreage differences are due to differences in geographic areas
and in constraints considered (e.g. Streets other than General Plan Circulation
Element roadways are subtracted).
Zone 13 LFMP 134 October I995
EXHIBIT 44
Zone 13 Yearly Sewer Demand
BASIN A: BASIN B:
Year Projected Yearly Cumulative Average Projected Yearly Cumulative Average Flow
Number of EDU Flow (MGD) Number of EDU (MGD)
1996 96.1 0.021 1 16.5 0.0036
1997 11.4 0.0237 16.5 0.0073
1998 51.1 0.0349 40.5 0.0162
1999 352.4 0.1124 686.5 0.1672
2000 63.4 0.1265 16.5 0.1708
2001 108.3 0.1502 8.3 0.1727
2002 81.7 0.1682 8.3 0.1745
2003 5.7 0.1694 8.3 0.1763
2004 5.7 0.1707 8.3 0.1781
2005 5.7 0.1719 8.3 0.1800
2006 5.7 0.1732 8.2 0.1818
2007 5.7 0.1744 . 8.2 0.1836
2008 5.7 0.1757 8.2 0.1854
2009 5.7 0.1769 8.2 0.1872
2010 142.7 0.2083 8.2 0.1890
Build Out 947 0.2083 859 0.1890
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 135
Exhibit 45
Equivalent Dwelling Units for Zone13 - Basin A
Specific Plan Area Parcel No. LFMP Land Use Land Use Acre?' EDU/Ac. EDU
Subarea
1 Map 13078 O/PI- 1 GIA 7.76 6 47 Existing
Lot 6
1 Map 13078 O/PI- 1 CIA 10.30 6 62 Existing
Lot5
1 4 O/PI- 1 GIA/ALT 10.87 7 76
2 6 O/PI-2 R&D/Office 5.78 7 40
2 7 O/PI-2 R&D/Office 5.78 7 40
34 2 8 O/PI-2 R&D/Office 4.84 7
5 17 TR-2 Resort 52.80 5 264
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ..... . . . . .
6 Map 13078 R Retail 10.70 7 75
Existing
Lot 3
6 15 R Retail 15.95 7 112
8a 3 os-2 Golf 45.61 0. I 5
. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8b 5 os4 Golf 26.46 0.1 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16 OS-5 Open Space 10.00 0 0 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
na na TR- 1 Resort 33.95 5 170
na na os- 1 Golf . 185.18 0.1 19
Basin A Total EDU's = 947
26 Net acres are from tentative maps for all areas except Subareas TR-1 and OS-1.
These acreages are from the Exhibit 10.
136 October 1995 Zone 13 w;MP
Exhibit 45
Equivalent Dwelling Units for Zone13 - Basin B
Land Use Acres EDU/Ac. EDU Specific Plan Area Parcel No. LFMP Land Use
Subarea
2 9 O/PI-2 R&D/Office 4.00 7 28
2 10
2 11
2 12
2 14
2 15
O/PI-2 R&D/Office 4.49 7 31
O/PI-2 R&D/Office 4.49 7 31
O/PI-2 R&D/Office 3.79 7 27
O/PI-2 R&D/Office 3.38 7 24
O/PI-2 R&D/Office 3.46 7 24
3 CT 92-7 TR/C HoteVRetail 10.48 5 52 Existing
Lot 14
4 18 TR-3 LEG0 128.32 5 642
7 1 OS-3 Open Space 53.42 0 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . , . . . , , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
Basin B Total EDU's = 859
Zone I3 LFMP 137 October 1995
Palomar Airport Road
LEGEND
I ’ 1. Parcel Number -
Please refer to Exhibit 45 for Land Use
and EDU associated with each parcel.
46 Hofman Planning 14~ s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - EDU per Land Use
EXHIBIT46
138
Poteal for R- Water .. 7.
The City of Carlsbad has prepared a Reclamation Master Plan, which was adopted
by the City Council in 1990. All future development will be required to conform
to the .recommendations as outlined in the Reclamation Master Plan and by
Ordinance No. 3 1. A more detailed description of reclaimed water is provided in
the water section on page 143.
B. PHASING
The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on
ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development.
Basin boundaries are shown on Exhibit 41 on page 128 and correlate with the sewer basins
within the zone. There are two separate basins, labeled Basins A and B, and thresholds
for the major sewer facilities within each basin can be easily established, thereby
determining the appropriate mitigation measures.
The basin boundaries allow for independent review and development for the sewer
facilities within each boundary. However, the City may require improvements outside of
the basin boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Zone 13 currently meets the adopted performance standard. Several improvements to the
Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor will be needed within five years. Also, facilities will be needed
to accommodate development. These improvements and other major sewer facilities wil f
be constructed as development occurs in Zone 13 to assure that conformance with the
adopted performance standard will be maintained through the build out of Zone 13.
111. MITIGATION
.. cia1 Conditions;
A. ALL WATERSHEDS
All development within Zone 13 will be required to pay the appropriate sewer connection
fee prior to issuance of any building permit.
B. Basin A
Basin A is located within the South Agua Hedionda sewer drainage basin. No
improvements are required to this system for Zone 13, other than the extension of the 10"
sewer main on Cannon Road.
Zone 13 w;MP 139 October I995
C. Basin B
Basin B is located within the Buena/Vallecitos Iiilerceptor sewer drainage basin. No
improvements are required to this system for Zone 13.
IV. FINANCING
There is no financing required for this zone other than the extension of the 10" sewer main in
Cannon Road.
Zone 13 LFMP 140 October 1995
EXHIBIT 47
' 'ILITY , .in A:
ZONE 13 - SEWER FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1 I1 195
ESTIMATED FUNDING OPTIONS
AMOUNT COST TIMING FIRST I SECOND I THIRD NOTES
20% Engr. and Admin
I 10 sewer line extension in Cannon Road 2,000 LF $1 70,000 Conc. wl dev.
15% Contingency 1 $25,500 I
$39,100 I
Total Sewer Costs 1 $234,600 I I
Notes: (1 1 Developer(s1 within the respective Sewer Basin shall
construct the necessary facilities concurrent with development.
The City shall be guaranteed of this construction by imposing
appropriate conditions on the pertinent tentative maps or
site development plans, as the case may be.
1
Zone 13 LFMP 141 October 1995
This page intentionally Left Blank
Zone 13 LFMP 142 October 1995
WATER FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided
concurrent with development. A minimum 10-day average storage capacity must be provided
prior to any development.
11. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies; Carlsbad
Municipal Water District, Vallecitos Water District, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
Each of these agencies has separate service areas. Water service for Zone 13 is provided entirely
by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) as shown on Exhibit 48 on page 144.
The Carlsbad Municipal Water District has a Master Plan, entitled "Water Master Plan" CMWD
Project 89-105, which was adopted January 29, 1991 by the Board of Directors. Its purpose is
to evaluate the water system within the District and to formulate long-range plans that will provide
for future improvements. CMWD is currently revising the above-described master plan, but has
not issued an approved revision.
The information contained in this Local Facilities Management Plan was obtained from the
CMWD's "Water Master Plan", the "City of Carlsbad Water Reclamation Master Plan," dated
January 1990 by Dudek and Associates, and through discussions with CMWD Engineering staff.
A. INVENTORY
1.
a. Potable System
The Zone 13 Area will be served by two water pressure zones. With
reference to Exhibit 49 on page 147, property lying within lower elevations
will be provided water service from the lower 255 Pressure Zone. The
remaining properties will be provided service from the higher 375 Pressure
Zone.
Zone 13 LFMP 143 October 1995
Oceanside
I'
I
t LEGEND Encinitas
Fl. Carlsbad Municipal Water District 121 Vallecitos Water District
Olivenhain Municipal Water 0istri.d
Hofman Plann
Associat
ing es
Zone 13 -Water Districts
EXHIBIT48
144
The existing water facilities for the 255 Pressure Zone include:
No. Faciliry Description
1. A I .5 MG steel tank reservoir located adjacent to the east boundary of the
Zone 13.
2. Two pressure reducing stations, one at the 1.5 MG steel tank, and the other
at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and proposed Armada Drive.
A 16-inch and 12-inch pipeline from the 1.5 MG steel tank aligned
southwesterly to Palomar Airport Road. (These two pipeline may need to be
relocated depending on site grading and other constraints.)
A IO-inch pipeline in Palomar Road from Armada Drive to Paseo Del None.
A 12-inch pipeline in Paseo Del None and Car Country Drive.
3.
4.
5.
The existing facilities for the 375 Pressure Zone include:
6. One 8.5 MG steel tank reservoir (now under construction to replace 1.25
MG.)
A 16-inch pipeline in Palomar Airport Road. 7.
b. Reclaimed System
The Carlsbad Municipal Water District operates and maintains two
reclaimed water pipelines in the Zone 13 Area. As shown on Exhibit 50,
page 148, there is an existing 8-inch pipeline in Palomar Airport Road.
Another 8-inch pipeline is in Hidden Valley Road extending from Palomar
Airport Road north to the vicinity of an existing 1.5 MG steel tank. The
water pressure in these pipelines is the same as the 375 Pressure Zone for
domestic water. However, it is noted that the pipeline in Hidden Valley
Road may need to be relocated based on proposed site grading plans.
No. Facility Description
1.
2.
An 8-inch pipeline in Palomar Airport Road.
An 8-inch pipeline in Hidden Valley Road from Palomar Airport Road to the
existing 1.5 million gallon tank.
.. 2. x1st1-
Zone 13 is comprised of 700.8927 gross acres and is used for agricultural and
ancillary purposes. To determine existing demand, the following methodology was
27 From Exhibit 10.
Zone 13 LFMP 145 October 1995
used. The acreage with slopes in excess of 25 percent was subtracted out to yield
a net acreage of 635.80 acres (Powerline easements were not subtracted out
because the land within the easement is used for agriculture)28. Due to seasonal
crop rotations, an average of 70 percent of the net acreage is in use at any one
time. With a consumption rate of 2500 GPD/acre for agricultural uses, the
existing demand within the zone is, therefore, 1.11 MGD.
3. Build Out Assumptiom
This section projects the ultimate build out for all of Zone 13, and is based on
tentative maps, when available. The tentative maps provide a more accurate
analysis than using general plan land uses. The tentative map acreages utilized in
this chapter are also listed in detail in Exhibit 45 on page ? in the Sewer Chapter
of this plan. It should be noted that, for the above reasons, the acreages shown
in this chapter may vary from the constraints analysis acreage provided in
Exhibit 10. The build out projections are listed below:
Land Use Projections
Commercial 26.65 Ac.
Professional & Related 68.94 Ac.
Hotels/Recreation 225.55 Ac.
In the above table, land use subareas TR-1, TR-2, TR-3 and TR/C comprise the
Hotels/Recreation category.
25% to 40% slopes are not considered a growth management constraint for non-
residential development and therefore are not shown on Exhibit 10.
18
146 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
- LEGEND
PI. Service Area Boundary IT] Existing Facility
*; .
Existing Reservoir - . I A I ServiceArea I I Prop. Facility
lwl Existing Lines I 4 I Existing P.R.. Station
l:m*-*'l Prop. Lines I . . 1 Prop. P.R.. Station
4 Hofman Planning 34, s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - Potable Water System
EXHIBIT49
147
LEGEND
IN 1. Service Area Boundary I @ I Existing Facility rl Service Area [TI Prop. Facility I/JI Existing Lines PI Prop. Lines
4 Hofrnan Planning
SdA s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 -Reclaimed Water System
EXHIBIT 50
148
4.
a. Average Potable Water Unit Demand
The Master Plan for CMWD established unit demand factors as a basis for
determining the projected average water demands. The following are the
average unit demand factors obtained from CMWD Master Plan:
Land Use Unit Demand
Commercial 1440 GPD/Ac.
Professional & Related 1440 GPD/Ac.
Hotels/Recreation 1440 GPD/Ac.
Agriculture 2500 GPD/Ac.
b. Fire Flow Demands
The fire flow requirements in CMWD's Master Plan are as follows:
Land Use Unit Demand (GPM)
Commercial 6Ooo
Professional & Related 3000-4000
HoteldRecreation 3000-4000
c. Reclaimed Water Average Unit Demand
CMWD's Water Reclamation Master Plan establishes unit demand factors
as a basis for determining the projected average water demands. The
average unit demand factor obtained from the Water Reclamation Master
Plan is 2.5 AF/AC/YR for irrigation usage for commercial/industrial land
uses. The number of irrigated acres in a commercial/industrial area is
estimated to be 15 % of the gross acreage.
The average unit demand factor for golf courses is 3.2 AF/AC/YR. For
purposes of this analysis, the number of irrigated acres in the golf course
area was estimated to be 100% of the net developable acreage.
Zone I3 LFMP 149 October 1995
The projected build out average potable water demands can be determined for
Management Zone 13 by multiplying the build out projections as established in this
plan to the average unit demand factors obtained from CMWD'S Master Plan.
Projected Average Projected B/O
Build Out (B/O) x Unit Demand = Average Water Demand
The estimated build out average potable water demand in Management Zone 13 is
as follows:
Land Use Projected Build Out Average Unit Average Build Out
Demand Water Demand
Commercial 26.65 Ac. 1440 GPDIAc. 38,376 GPD
Professional
& Related
68.94 Ac. 1440 GPDIAc. 99,274 GPD
HotelsIRec. 225.55 Ac. 1440 GPD/Ac. 324,792 GPD
Total 462,442 GPD
As stated previously, the above acreages are from tentative map level information
and therefore may not necessarily coincide exactly with the figures shown in
Exhibit 10. The estimated build out average reclaimed water demand in
Management Zone 13 is as follows:
Land Use Irrigated Acres Average Unit Average Build Out
Demand Water Demand
Commercial/ 51.9 Ac. 2.5 AFlAClYR 129.75 AFIYR
Professional1
Hotel
Agricultural 56.6 Ac. 2.8 AFIACIYR 158.48 AFIYR
Golf Course 191.0 Ac. 3.2 AFIACIYR 61 1.20 AFIYR
Total 899.43 AFIYR
OR 0.803 MGD
For planning purposes, yearly demand projections are shown on the following two
pages for the potable system and the reclaimed system, respectively.
Zone 13 LFMP 150 October 1995
YEARLY POTABLE WATER DEMANDSz9
Year Commercial Professional HoteURec. Agricultural Acres Cumulative Average
Acres Acres Acres Demand (MGD)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0.0
9.2
0.0
9.2
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.3
4.3
4.3
9.1
4.3
2.1
18.7
2. I
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.8
184.5
12.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
647.3
(647.3)M
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0'
0.0
1.13
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.4 1
0.41
0.41
0.4 1
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.43
29 Existing agricultural uses will be phased out as development occurs.
30 It is assumed that with the first development in the Agricultural Areas, reclaimed facilities will be
provided to the entire Agricultural areas.
Zone 13 LFMP 151 October 1995
YEARLY RECLAIMED WATER DEMANDS
Year Commercial/Professional Golf Course Irrigated Agricultural Cumulative
Irrigated Acres Acres Acres Irrigation
Demand Acre-
FeetlYR
I r r igat ed”
1995 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1996 4.0 0.0 472.43’ 1332.72
1997 0.3 0.0 (2.1) 1327.59
1998
1999
4.3
28.8
0.0 (26.4)
191 .O (326.2)
1264.42
1034.26
2000 2.2 0.0 (9.0) 1014.56
1009.7 I 2001 0.3 0.0 (2.0)
2002 2.3 0.0 (21.1) 956.38
2003 0.5 0.0 (2.7) 950.07
2004 0.5 0.0 0.0 951.32
2005 0.5 0.0 0.0 952.57
2006 0.5 0.0 0.0 953.82
2007 0.5 0.0 0.0 955.07
2008 0.5 0.0 0.0 956.32
2009 0.5 0.0 0.0 957.57
2010 6.2 0.0 (26.3) 899.43
B/O 51.9 191.0 56.6 899.4 AC-
FrlYR
3 I Existing Agriculture uses will be phased out as development occurs.
32 It is assumed that once development occurs reclaimed facilities will be provided to the agriculture
areas
152 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
The CMWD Master Plan proposes the following major potable water facilities as
shown on Exhibit 49 on page 147 for the ultimate build out of Zone 13:
To provide adequate water service the following facilities are required in
the 375 Pressure Zone only:
No. Facilitv DescriDtion
I. 16-inch pipeline in Hidden Valley Road extending from Camino De Las Ondas north
to the vicinity of the existing 1.5 MG reservoir. This will enable the fire flow to be
provided to the area from the 8.5 MG reservoir now under construction.
A 12-inch pipeline extending in an easement across Parcel 11 from Hidden Valley
Road to Cannon Road.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
A 16-inch pipeline in Armada Drive from Palomar Airport Road to Cannon Road.
A 10-inch pipeline in Leg0 Drive.
A minimum 8-inch pipeline in "D" Street.
A minimum 12-inch pipeline east of Car Country Drive to the easterly boundary of
Zone 13 in Cannon Road.
A pressure reducing station east of Car Country Drive. 7.
The following facilities are required in the 255 Pressure Zone:
8. A 16-inch pipeline from the existing 1.5 million gallon reservoir to Palomar Airport
Road.
9. Removal of the existing 12-inch and 16-inch transmission lines.
The CMWD Reclaimed Water Master Plan proposes the following major reclaimed
water facilities as shown on Exhibit 50 on page 148 for the ultimate build out of
Zone 13:
Zone 13 L.FMP 153 October 1995
No. Facility Description
1. 12-inch pipeline in Hidden Valley Road and easement from Palomar Airport Road to
Cannon Road. (There is an existing temporary 8-inch water line in Hidden Valley
Road from Palomar Airport Road to the Reservoir.)
20-inch pipeline in Cannon Road from Car Country Drive to proposed 12-inch water
line easement per item 1.
8-inch pipeline in Armada Drive from Palomar Airport Road to Cannon Road.
(Carlsbad Ranch Unit No. 1 has been designed and approved C.T. 92-7 on
December 23,1993.
8-inch pipeline in Leg0 Drive.
8-inch pipeline in Paseo Del None from Palomar Airport Road to Car Country
Drive.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The location and sizes of the major water mains were approximated only for the
purpose of this Facility Management Plan. The exact sizes and locations will be
determined as the area develops and the water mains are designed according to
District standards.
Watez: .. 7.
On March 21, 1989, the City of Carlsbad adopted an interim Reclaimed Water Use
Policy for new land development. This policy specifies that all new development
within the City of Carlsbad shall use reclaimed water if it can be reasonably
determined by District and the District Engineer that reclaimed water is available
to serve the project. The interim policy further indicates that installation of dual
irrigation systems and connections to reclaimed water sources may be required
subject to the terms and conditions of the Water Reclamation Master Plan.
Additionally, the City adopted a mandatory use ordinance stating that if reclaimed
water is available it will be used.
The CMWD has prepared a Water Reclamation Master Plan which indicates
availability of reclaimed water to new development within the District. Areas
identified by this plan for reclaimed water use will be subject to the Interim
Reclaimed Water Use Policy and consequent requirements from the District
Engineer as specified above. The Water Reclamation Master Plan was approved
by City Council March 3, 1992, Resolution Number 779.
There are approximately 310.7 acres of general plan open space33 within Zone 13
that could potentially benefit from the future use of reclaimed water.
33 This acreage is taken from tentative map acreages as shown in Exhibit 45 on page
137 and includes those parcels whose land use is either agricultural or golf course.
It does not include open space Parcel 16 as shown on Exhibit 46.
Zone 13 LFMP 154 October 1995
B. PHASING
The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on
ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development.
Service area boundaries are shown on Exhibit 49 on page 147 and correlate with logical
boundaries of the proposed water facilities within the Zone. There are two separate
service areas, labeled Service Areas A and B. and thresholds for the major water facilities
within each service area may be determined as these areas are developed.
The service area boundaries allow for independent review and development for the water
facilities within each boundary. However, the Water District may require improvements
outside the service area boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development.
C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS
Zone 13 currently conforms with the adopted performance standard. Since CMWD
requires development to install domestic water and fire-flow needs as a condition to the
approval of future development, conformance with the adopted standards will be
maintained to ultimate build out of Zone 13.
D. AVERAGE 10-DAY STORAGE CAPACITY
Per the CMWD Water Master Plan the storage capacity within the system is currently 12.9
days.
The projected storage capacity is 254.5 million gallons with average daily demand
estimated to be 24.54 million gallons. This will provide for a projected storage of 10.4
days' capacity. Thus, the district's system design assures that a minimum of ten days'
storage supply will be available.
STORAGE CAPACITY
Current - 1990 Ultimate
Storage Capacity .
Average Daily Demand
Days of Storage
168.0 million gallons
13.1 million gallons
254.5 million gallons
24.54 million gallons
12.9 days 10.4 days
155 October 1995 Zone 13 L.FMP
111. MITIGATION
.. SDecial Cond ltlQIlS
A. All future development in Zone 13 shall pay a major facilities fee based on EDU's to the
Carlsbad Municipal Water District and a capacity charge to the San Diego County Water
Authority. In addition, all development in Zone 13 shall be required to provide any water
reclamation facilities identified in the Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by
the District Engineer. Any water reclamation facilities necessary to accommodate future
development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a
grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. These guarantees shall be
based upon the requirements for the service area within which the proposed development
is located to the extent that the demand is created by future development.
B. Service Area A
Water facilities will be provided at the time of development within Service Area A, to the
satisfaction of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
1. The proposed minimum 12-inch water main in future Cannon Road.
2. The proposed pressure regulating station in Cannon Road east of Car
Country Drive.
3. The proposed 8-inch reclaimed water lines in future Armada Drive and
future Leg0 Drive.
4. The proposed 16-inch water main in future Armada Drive.
5. The proposed 10-inch water main in future Leg0 Drive.
6. The proposed 12-inch water main extending from Hidden Valley Road to
Cannon Road.
7. The proposed minimum 8-inch water main in future D Street.
C. Service Area B
The following water facilities will be required as a condition to the approval of future
development within Service Area B to the satisfaction of CMWD.
1. The proposed relocation of the existing 16-inch water line from existing
reservoir to the existing 16-inch water line in Palomar Airport Road.
Zone 13 WMP 156 October 1995
2. The proposed 16-inch water line in future Armada Drive
3. The proposed 8 -inch reclaimed water lines in future Armada Drive, future
Leg0 Drive and Paseo Del Norte.
IV. FINANCING
A. Service Area A
The cost of the proposed pothole water facilities listed above is estimated to be $465,000.
These facilities are to be financed by the development for which they are required.
The cost of the proposed reclaimed water line listed above is $101,250. This facility is
to be financed by the development for which it is required.
a B. Service Area B
The cost of the proposed potable water facilities listed above is estimated to be $325,000.
These facilities are to be financed by the development for which they are required.
The cost of the proposed reclaimed water lines listed above is $190,350. These facilities
are to be financed by the development for which they are required.
An itemized cost estimate of this facility is contained in Exhibit 51 on page 158. This estimate
should only be used as a guide to approximate costs for preliminary planning purposes. Further
cost analysis should be made as planning and design progress in Zone 13.
Zone 13 LFMP 157 October 1995
EXHIBIT 51
ZONE 13 - WATER FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 1/1/95
FACILITY
*ice Area A:
o I 2" Water Main in future Cannon Rd.
2 Pressure Regulating Station - Cannon Rd.
3 8" Reclaimed Water Main - LegoIArmada Dr
4 16" Water Main . Armada Dr
5 10" Water Main - Leg0 Dr
6 12" Water Main - Hidden Valley to Cannon Rd
7 8" Water Main - D St
Potable subtotal
Reclaimed subtotal
Service Area A Subtotal
Service Area B:
1. 16" Water Main - Relocation
2. 16" Water Main - Armada Dr.
3. 8" Reclaimed Water Main - Armada, Lego, Paseo Del Norte
Potable subtotal
Reclaimed subtotal
Service Area 6 Subtotal
Total Water Costs
Notes:
AMOUNT
2.700 LF
1 EA
3,750 LF
2,250 LF
1,500 LF
2,100 LF
2,100 LF
3.600 LF
2,900 LF
7.050 LF
ESTIMATED
COST
$97.200
$75.000.
$101,250
$1 12;500 $4a,ooo
$75,600
$56,700
$465.000
5101,250
$566,250
$1 ao.ooo
$1 45.000
$1 90.350
$325.000
$1 90.350
$515,350
$1.081,6OQ
TIMING
Conc wldev
Fl
FIRST
Developer
IING OPTII
SECOND
5
THIRD
(1) Developerls) within the respective Water Service Areas shall
construct the necessary facilities concurrent with development.
the City shall be guaranteed of this construction by imposing
appropriate conditions on the pertinent tentative maps or
site development plans, as the case may be.
Zone 13 LFMP 7 58 October f995
(This Page intentionally left blank)
October 1995 Zone 13 WMP 159
FACILITY FINANCING
This chapter details how the public facilities and improvements required of Zone 13 to maintain
the adopted Growth Management performance standards will be financially guaranteed. This
chapter addresses all applicable special conditions contained within this adopted Local Facilities
Management Plan.
FINANCING MECHA NISMS
In preparing this financing plan, it became clear that no single financing mechanism could satisfy
the complex infrastructure requirements of this zone. Therefore, several financing techniques are
being used to address both the need for upgrading facilities, enabling them to conform with the
adopted performance standards, and to ensure conformance of fhture facilities as development
occurs. The following financing techniques will be used to guarantee the public facilities needed
to serve future development within Zone 13:
.. A. ies Diswt No. 1
Development in Zone 13 will contribute to a number of citywide and regional facilities
including the construction of Cannon Road West through participation in the Community
Facilities District No. 1. All parcels in Zone 13 are either currently within CFD No. 1
or will annex to CFD No. 1 concurrent with approval of the first discretionary permit.
Asseswnt Dwict 95-1 .. B.
Development within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan area of Zone 13 may finance certain
facilities through participation in proposed Assessment District 95-1. This district mav
finance a number of facilities which benefit the Carlsbad Ranch area of the zone includim
traffic signals, intersection improvements, wet and dry utilities, and street improvements
at various locations. All parcels within Carlsbad Ranch will either be included in the
Assessment District when it is formed or annex into it concurrent with approval of the first
discretionary permit.
Assessment District 95-1 may replace or offset the participation of Carlsbad Ranch
properties in other financing mechanisms for certain major facilities by providing a
financial guarantee for the Carlsbad Ranch property's share of those improvements.
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed, alternative funding mechanisms
(e.g . bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees,
improvement agreements, etc) may be used without amendment to this document, subject
to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management Director and City
Attorney.
Zone 13 UMP 160 October 1995
C. DeveloDer F-
Many of the drainage, sewer, water and circulation improvements will be directly funded
and constructed by the developer(s). Facilities earmarked for developer funding are
limited to those which normally would have been imposed as a condition of approval of
a tentative map under the City's existing development review process. Without these
essential facilities, the associated Planning Areas could not be developed.
When appropriate, the City may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer
for any facility which is included in a City impact fee program. The source of
reimbursement shall be from the appropriate City impact fee. The schedule for
reimbursement shall be based on the City's capital improvement program and the
availability of unobligated impact fee revenue.
E.
F.
eements Amnnp ProDea Owners
Several facilities discussed in this plan are also required of other zones and property
owners. Developers of Zone 13 may enter into private agreements with other property
owners to address reimbursement for such facilities. Any such agreement must be
recorded against the title of the participating properties and a copy of the recorded
document must be provided to the City's Growth Management Division. -
As a major link in the circulation network, Cannon Road from 1-5 to El Camino Real
(Cannon Road West) will provide significant public benefit to the City as well as the
region. Although there are several financing mechanisms which will contribute to the
funding of Cannon Road West, the portion of the improvements which will benefit in
common Zones 5, 8, 13 and 24 is anticipated to be financed through a fee program.
FINANCING PLANS FOR OTHER ZONES
Per the Growth Management Ordinance, future finance plans for other zones which impact
facilities in common with Zone 13 shall be coordinated with this Finance Plan. Coordination,
however, shall not require identical funding methods.
ING AND AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT
This plan is based on certain assumptions regarding the timing of development of Zone 13 in
relation to other zones that share certain facilities with Zone 13. In the event that another zone
develops earlier or later than anticipated, this plan may need to be amended.
161 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
The areas of development, referred to as Finance Areas herein, are detailed in Exhibit 52, on
page 164. These Financing Areas respect the following:
0) Property 0 wner bou&r i e$ - Finance Area 7 is owned by SDG&E, Finance Area
1 is owned by the Gemological Institute of America, a portion of Finance Area 2
is owned by the National Association of Music Merchants, and the remaining
Finance Areas are currently owned by the Carlsbad Ranch Company and its
affiliates.
.. (ii) rinclples
Because this Finance section is being processed concurrently with the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan SP 207(A) and the Zone 13 LFMP (87-13B), this section
describes how the Finance Areas in this Finance Plan are designed to be consistent
with and cross-referenced to the Specific Plan Areas in SP 207(A) and the General
Plan Land Use Subareas from LFMP(87-13B).
Specific Plan Area Consistency - The finance areas have been drawn and
numbered, to the extent possible, to conform to the Planning Areas
identified in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (Planning/Finance Areas 1
through 6). Planning Area/Finance Area 1 is owned by the Gemological
Institute of America. Land uses and facility requirements vary with the
geographic location between various parcels owned by the Carlsbad Ranch
Company, hence Finance Areas 2 through 6 are called out separately.
Since Zone 13 encompasses additional property north of Cannon Road
which is not a part of the Specific Plan but which is required to participate
in financing mechanisms, this property has been designated as Finance
Area 7.
Since Planning Area 8a of the Specific Plan and a portion of Planning Area
8b are a part of the golf course associated with the Resort, these areas are
incorporated into Finance Area 5, rather than being numbered as stand
alone Finance Areas. Planning Area 9 is not included in the financing
areas because it will remain natural open space.
Zone 13 LFMP Land Use Subarea Consistency - The Zone 13 LFMP
divides the zone into General Plan Land Use Subareas based on land use
and ownership. For properties within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan SP
207(A), the General Plan Land Use Subareas are divided similarly to the
Specific Plan Areas.
For ease of reference, the following matrix identifies the Planning Areas
from’ SP 207(A) and the General Plan Land Use Subarea from the Zone 13
LFMP which correlate to each of the Finance Area shown on Exhibit 52 on
page 164.
162 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
I
Finance Area
4 4 TR-3
Planning Area General Plan
[SP 207(A)] Land Use Subarea
5 5,8a, 8b TR-2
6 6 R
7 Not a part TR- 1
Zone 13's Finance Areas may, or may not, develop in numerical order and the finance plan does
not require the sequential development of the zone. Each facility is linked to the related
development area, regardless of timing.
SUMMARY
The appropriate financing mechanism for each special condition was determined based on the
scale, scope and timing of the improvement. The following matrix (Exhibit 53, on page 165)
summarizes the financing strategy for each public facility and also correlates the schedule of
facility requirements to individual Finance Areas within Zone 13.
A discussion of each facility follows, including a detailed description of the financial guarantee
for each special condition.
Zone 13 LFMP 163 October 1995
LEGEND
I I ' Finance Area 1 Open Space Area, Not a Part
~
Hofman Planning ==A s s o c i a t e s
Zone 13 - Finance Areas
EXHIBIT52
164
Zone 13 LFMP
,'
Ouober 1995
Parks
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
FinancinP Mechanism
Recreational Facilities for
employees within Zone 13
NIA
Local Facilities Management Fee (LFM Fee)
Payment of LFM Fee at building permit issuance
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
A Zone 13 LFM Fee shall be established to fund recreational facilities to offset the demand
created by employees within Zone 13. The amount of the fee shall be 40 cents per square foot
of non-residential development within Zone 13.
Guarantee
Payment of LFM Fee at building permit issuance.
Zone 13 WMP 166 October 1995
Drainage Condition C1
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
51" - 60" Storm Drain Line BAA
$873,439
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Finance Areas 1, 5, 6, and 7
Drainage Fees
Financing Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 5, 6 or 7, the City Engineer determines that this
drainage facility is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer(s) of Finance Area
1, 5, 6 or 7, shall finance its construction. If needed, this facility would normally be imposed as
a condition of approval on the tentative map@) for these Finance Areas.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition C 1 as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition C1 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 5, 6 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimbursemea
This 51"- 66" storm drain (BAA) is identified in the Master Drainage Plan and as such is included
in the City's Drainage Fee program. The developer may receive reimbursement for costs directly
related to the construction of this facility to the extent that funds are available from drainage fees
as allowed under Section 20.09.090 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The schedule for
reimbursement shall be 'based on the revised Master Drainage Plan, the City's capital
improvement program and the availability of unobligated drainage funds.
Zone 13 LFMP 167 October 1995
Drainage Condition D1
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Mechanism
42" - 48" Storm Drain Line CB
$795,667
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 5
Drainage Fees
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 or 5, City Engineer determines that this
drainage facility is necessary to accommodate that finance area, the developer of Finance Area
2, 3, 4 or 5 shall finance its construction. If needed, this facility would normally be imposed as
a condition of approval on the tentative map(s) for these Finance Areas.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Areas 2, 3. 4 or 5 by imposing Condition D1 as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition D1 referenced above if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 5. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Re im bursemea
This 42"48" storm drain (CB) is identified in the Master Drainage Plan and as such is included
in the City's Drainage Fee program. The developer may receive reimbursement for costs directly
related to the construction of this facility to the extent that funds are available from drainage fees
as allowed under Section 20.09.090 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The schedule for
reimbursement shall be based on the revised Master Drainage Plan, the City's capital
improvement program and the availability of unobligated drainage funds.
Zone 13 LFMP 168 October 1995
Drainage Condition D2
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Mechanism
42" - 51" Storm Drain Line CC
$855,945
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 5
Drainage Fees
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 or 5, the City Engineer determines that this
drainage facility is necessary to accommodate that finance area, the developer of Finance Area
2, 3, 4 or 5 shall finance its construction. If needed, this facility would normally be imposed as
a condition of approval on the tentative map(s) for these Finance Areas.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 5 by imposing Condition D2 as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition D2 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 5. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
bursemem
This 42" - 5 1 " storm drain (CC) is identified in the Master Drainage Plan and as such is included
in the City's Drainage Fee program. The developer may receive reimbursement for costs directly
related to the construction of this facility to the extent that funds are available from drainage fees
as allowed under Section 20.09.090 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The schedule for
reimbursement shall be based on the revised Master Drainage Plan, the City's capital
improvement program and the availability of unobligated drainage funds.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 169
Circulation Condition la
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
Cannon Rd/I-5 NB ramps and Cannon RdlI-5
SB ramps - traffic signals, restriping and
widen southbound ramp
$232 ,OOO
Public Facilities Fee (PFF), Traffic Impact Fee
(TW
Payment of PFF and TIF at building permit
issuance or Improvement Agreement
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5 and 7
City PFF and TIF
Zones 3. 5. 8. 15 and 24
The above mentioned signal lights and intersection improvements including widening of the
southbound ramps are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program. If at the time of
development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5 or 7, these improvements have not been installed and the
City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the Growth Management
Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance Area shall front the
construction of the needed signals and improvements.
Guarantee
Payment of PFF and TIF prior to issuance of building permit for any affected finance areas. In
addition, if determined to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the
City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1,
2. 5 or 7 by imposing Condition la as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition la referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable.fina1 map. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with
Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security
as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash,
irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
170 October 1995 Zone 13 w;MP
bursem
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5 or 7 is required to install the improvements mentioned
above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly related to the installation
of these improvements to the extent that funds are available from Public Facilities Fee and Traffic
Impact Fee revenues. The schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the availability of unobligated PFF and TIF funds.
Zone 13 w;MP 171 October 1995
11 Circulation Condition 2a
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
Cannon Road from 1-5 to Car Country Drive -
add lane in westbound direction
$150,000
Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), Developer Funding
Payment of TIF at building permit issuance or
Improvement Agreement
Finance Areas 1 , 2, 4, 5, and 7
City TIF
Zones 3, 5, 8, 15 and 24
The portion of the above mentioned improvements from 1-5 to Paseo del Norte is included in the
City's Capital Improvement Program as being funded through Traffic Impact Fees. However,
only Finance Areas 1, 2, 4 and 5 are required to participate in this particular improvement.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2,4,5 or 7, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Payment of TIF prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, if determined to be needed
and if not already constructed, the City can ensure these improvements will be constructed with
the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition 2d as a condition of
approval on the appropriate tentative map@).
The condition referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with
Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security
as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash,
irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 172 October 1995
If the developer(s) of Finance Area 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7, is required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
In addition, if the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 is required to install the
improvements mentioned above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly
related to the installation of these improvements to the extent that funds are available from Traffic
Impact Fee revenues. The schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the availability of unobligated TIF funds.
Zone 13 LFMP 173 October 1995
Circulation Condition 2b
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Reimbursement
Cannon Road from Car Country Drive to
eastern zone boundary - two lanes each
direct ion
$8,467 ,OOO
CFD No. 1, Assessment District 95-1, TransNet,
Cannon Road West Fee Program
Formation of and participation in Assessment
District 95-1 or Frontage Improvement
Agreement, Payment of Cannon Road West fee
prior to Building Permit, Participation in CFD
No. 1, TransNet Funds
Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7
Cannon Road West Fee Program
Zones 3. 5. 8. 15 and 24
The portion of the above improvements from Car Country Drive to the eastern boundary of the
Carlsbad Ranch property are anticipated to be funded by proposed Assessment District 95- 1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
However, only Finance Areas 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Carlsbad Ranch are required to participate in the
funding of this particular improvement. Finance Area 7 is not within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan area and therefore may not be included within Assessment District 95-1. If Finance Area
7 is not included in Assessment District 95-1, then an alternative mechanism will be required for
Finance Area 7.
In addition to Assessment District 95-1 funding, the inside lanes of Cannon Road and frontage
improvements in General Plan Open Space are also included in the Cannon Road West Fee
Program. As proposed, certain Zone 13 Finance Areas, are included in the proposed Cannon
Road West Fee Program. These are Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, and 7. The portion of each Finance
Area required to participate in the Cannon Road West Fee Program is specifically identified in
the fee study dated November 4, 1994 as contained in Appendix A-5. For any Finance Area
required to participate in both Assessment District 95-1 and the Cannon Road West Fee Program,
to the extent that the improvements covered in each program are duplicated, participation in
Assessment District 95-1 will be credited against the fees required per the Cannon Road West Fee
Program.
If Assessment District 95-1 is not formed (or if any of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are not.
included), then construction of the frontage improvements could be guaranteed through an
Improvement Agreement or alternative mechanism as discussed below, with the inside lanes being
guaranteed by the Cannon Road West Fee Program. In the event that Assessment District 95-1
is not formed and/or the Cannon Road West Fee Program is not adopted, alternative funding
Zone 13 LFMP 174 October 1995
mechanisms (e.g. bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees,
improvement agreements, etc) may be used without amendment to this document, subject to the
review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to final map recordation. Adoption of Cannon Road
West Fee Program prior to final map recordation. Payment of Cannon Road West Fee prior to
building permit issuance. In addition, if determined to be needed at time of development and if
not already constructed, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the
development of Finance Area 1, 2,4,5 or 7 by imposing Condition 2b as a condition of approval
on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that either Assessment District 95-1 is not formed or the Cannon Road West Fee
Program is not adopted (or neither event occurs) prior to recordation of a final map for affected
Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may propose an alternative financial mechanism equivalent
to the Assessment District tax or fee amount, subject to the approval of the City Engineer,
Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If an Improvement Agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer@) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad municipal Code.
In addition, if the developer(s) of Finance Area 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are required to construct frontage
improvements which would have been the responsibility of another developer, then the developer
constructing the improvements may receive reimbursement from the responsible property owner.
The City may require the reimbursement from the responsible developer as a condition of
approval of that developer(s) tentative map.
Zone 13 LFMP 175 October 1995
Circulation Condition 2c II
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
Armada Drive/Lego Drive from Cannon Road
to Palomar Airport Road
$2,573,000
Assessment District 95- 1
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 or
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
NIA
none
The above mentioned improvements are included in the proposed Assessment District 95-1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are required to participate in the funding of this particular
improvement.
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed, alternative fbnding mechanisms (e.g.
bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees, etc.) may be used
without amendment to this document, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer,
Financial Management Director and the City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 these improvements have not
been installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to Final Map recordation. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 by
imposing Condition 2c as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed prior to recordation of a final map for the
affected Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may propose an alternative financial mechanism
equivalent to the Assessment District tax or fee amount, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
176 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
If an Improvement Agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 177
Circulation Condition 2d
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
Mecm
Paseo del NortelCannon Road - traffic signal,
restriping, and add a northbound exclusive
right-turn lane, an eastbound left-turn lane
and a westbound shared throughlright-turn
$169,000
Public Facilities Fee (PFF), Developer Funding
Payment of PFF at building permit issuance or
Improvement agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7
City PFF
Zones 3. 5. 8. 15 and 24
The above mentioned signal is included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The
intersection improvements are anticipated to be developer funded. If at the time of development
of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7, these improvements have not been installed and the City Engineer
determines that these improvements are necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation
Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance Area shall finance their
construct ion.
Guarantee
Payment of PFF prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, if determined to be needed
and if not already constructed, the City can ensure these improvements will be constructed with
the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition 2d as a condition of
approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2d referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with
Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security
as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash,
irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 UMP 178 October 1995
ursem
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
In addition, if the developer(s) of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 installs the signal light mentioned
above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursement for costs directly related to the installation
of these signals to the extent that funds are available from Public Facility Fee revenues. The
schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
the availability of unobligated PFF funds.
179 October 1995 Zone 13 LZMP
Circulation Condition 2e
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also Required by:
Car Country Drive/Cannon Road - Traffic
signal, restriping and add a northbound
exclusive right-turn lane
$1 10,000
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7
Zones 3, 8. 15 and 24
Yes
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7, the Engineer determines that these
improvements are necessary to maintain the Growth Circulation Management Performance
standard, the developer of that Finance Area shall finance their construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure these improvements will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition 2e
as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2e referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with
Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security
as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash,
irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
Reimburse-
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
180 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
Circulation Condition 2f
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement 11 Facilitv also reauired bv:
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road -
westbound exclusive rieht-turn lane
$185,000
Assessment District 95- 1
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 or
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 6
Yes
Zones 3. 5. 8 and 24 P > I ~
Mechanism
The above mentioned improvements are included in the proposed Assessment District 95-1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
However, only Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 6 are required to participate in the funding of this
particular improvement.
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed, alternative funding mechanisms (e.g.
bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees, etc.) may be used
without amendment to this document, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer,
Financial Management Director and the City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 or 6, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to Final Map recordation. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6 by imposing
Condition 2f as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed prior to recordation of a final map for the
affected Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may propose an alternative financial mechanism
equivalent to the Assessment District tax or fee amount, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 181 October 1995
If an improvement agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 2, 3, 4, or 6 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Catlsbad Municipal Code to the extent funds are included in Assessment District 95-1, subject to
the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Zone 13 LFMP 182 October 1995
Circulation Condition 2g II
1 Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement 11 Facility also reauired bv:
Leg0 DriveKannon Road - traffic signal and
construction of imDrovements
$5,000
(signal included in Armadakg0 Drive cost)
Assessment District 95- 1
Participation in Assessment District 95-1 or
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7
Yes
Zones 3. 5. 8. 15 and 24 I' I,,
The above improvements are anticipated to be funded by proposed Assessment District 95-1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
However, only Finance Areas 1, 2, 4 and 5 are required to participate in the funding of this
particular improvement. Finance Area 7 is not within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan area and
therefore may not be included within Assessment District 95-1. If Finance Area 7 is not included
in Assessment District 95-1, then an alternative mechanism will be required for Finance Are 7.
If Assessment District 95-1 is not formed (or if any of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are not
included), then alternative funding mechanisms (e.g. bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement
agreements, development impact fees, etc.) may be used without amendment to this document,
subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management Director and the
City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2,4, 5 or 7, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to Final Map recordation. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 by
imposing Condition 2g as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed prior to recordation of a final map for the
affected Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may propose an alternative financial mechanism
183 October 1995 Zone I3 LFMP
equivalent to the Assessment District tax or fee amount, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If an improvement agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code to the extent funds are included in Assessment District 95-1, subject to
the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Zone 13 LFMP 184 October 1995
Armada DrivelPalomar Airport Road - traffic
signal modification, restriping, add eastbound
left-turn lane and westbound exclusive right-
turn lane
Circulation Condition 2h
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by: Zones 3, 5, 8 and 24
$205 ,OOO
Assessment District 95-1
Participation in Assessment District 95-1 or
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, and 4
Yes
The above improvements are anticipated to be funded by proposed Assessment District 95-1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
However, only Finance Areas 2, 3 and 4 are required to participate in the funding of this
particular improvement.
If Assessment District 95-1 is not formed (or if any of Finance Areas 2, 3 or 4 are not included),
then alternative funding mechanisms (e.g. bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements,
development impact fees, etc.) may be used without amendment to this document, subject to the
review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management Director and the City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 2, 3, or 4, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to Final Map recordation. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, or 4 by imposing
Condition 2h as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed prior to recordation of a final map forthe
affected Finance Areas, the property owner@) may propose an alternative financial mechanism
equivalent to the amount, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
1s October 1995 Zone 13 LJ'MP
If an improvement agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 2, 3, or 4 are required to construct the above improvements,
they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code to the extent funds are included in Assessment District 95-1, subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
Zone 13 L.FMP 186 October 1 !395
Circulation Condition 2i
Estimated Cost
Hidden Valley Road/Palomar Airport Road -
install traffic signal and construction of
intersection
$155,000
Financing Mechanism I Assessment District 95-1
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Participation in Assessment District 95- 1 or
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, and 4
Yes
Facilitv also reauired bv: I Zones 3. 5. 8 and 24
Mechanism
The above improvements are anticipated to be hnded by proposed Assessment District 95-1. The
entire Carlsbad Ranch properties are anticipated to participate in Assessment District 95-1.
However, only Finance Areas 2, 3 and 4 are required to participate in the funding of this
particular improvement.
If Assessment District 95-1 is not formed (or if any of Finance Areas 2, 3 or 4 are not included),
then alternative hnding mechanisms (e.g. bonds, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements,
development impact fees, etc.) may be used without amendment to this document, subject to the
review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management Director and the City Attorney.
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 2, 3, or 4, these improvements have not been
installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are necessary to maintain the
Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer of the applicable Finance
Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
Formation of Assessment District 95-1 prior to Final Map recordation. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, or 4 by imposing
Condition 2i as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map@).
In the event that Assessment District 95-1 is not formed prior to recordation of a final map for the
affected Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may propose an alternative financial mechanism
equivalent to the amount, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, Financial Management
Director and City Attorney.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 187
If an improvement agreement is utilized as an alternative financing mechanism, then the
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
ursemea
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 2, 3, or 4 are required to construct the above improvements,
they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code to the extent funds are included in Assessment District 95-1, subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
Zone I3 LFMP 188 October 1995
Circulation Condition
2.j.i
(Cannon Road not
extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Reimbursement
Participating Finance
Area
Palomar Airport Road/I-S Northbound Ramps - restriping
$1,725
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Yes
Finance Area 2, 3, 4 and 6
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6, the Engineer determines that these
improvements are necessary to maintain the Growth Circulation Management Performance
standard, the developer of that Finance Area shall finance their construction.
‘Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure these improvements will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6 by imposing Condition 2.j.i
(Cannon Road not extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.J.i. (Cannon Road not extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the
City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimburse-
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 2, 3. 4 or 6 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
189 October 1995 Zone 13 L.FMP
Circulation Condition
2.j.ii
(Cannon Road not
Extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Reimbursement
Participating Finance
Areas
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road -
restriping and improvements
$1.150
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Yes
Finance Areas 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Financing Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2. 3, 4, 5. 6 or 7, the City Engineer'determines
that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance,
the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 by imposing Condition
2.j.ii (Cannon Road not extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.j.ii (Cannon Road not extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the
City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of a final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7. The
improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act
and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be
secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit,
acceptable to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimburse-
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Zone 13 LFMP 190 October 1995
Circulation Condition
2.j.i
(Cannon Road
Extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Reimbursement
Participating Finance
Areas
Cannon Road/IJ Northbound Ramps -
widening and restriping
$1,150
TIF. Developer funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Fina
recordation
TIF
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7
The above mentioned ramp widening is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program as
being funded through TIF fees. The intersection improvements are anticipated to be developer
funded. If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7, these improvements have
not been installed and the City Engineer determines that these improvements are necessary to
maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard. the developer of the
applicable Finance Area shall finance their construction.
Guarantee
Payment of TIF fees prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, if determined to be
needed and if not already constructed, the City can ensure these improvements will be constructed
with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition 2.j.i. (Cannon Road
extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.j.i (Cannon Road extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City
Engineer. shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimburse-
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Zone 13 LFMP 191 October 1995
In addition, if the developer@) of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 installs the signal light mentioned
above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursement for costs directly related to the installation
of these signals to the extent that funds are available from Traffic Impact Fee revenues. The
schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
the availability of unobligated TIF funds.
October 1995 Zone 13 L.FMP 192
Circulation Condition
2.j.ii
(Cannon Road
Extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Palomar Airport RoadlI-5 Northbound Ramps - restriping
$1,725
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 6
Financ in&kzhmm
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6. the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, -
the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 2. 3, 4 or 6 by imposing Condition 2.j.ii
(Cannon Road extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.j.ii. (Cannon Road extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the
City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of a final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 193 October 1995
Circulation Condition
2 .j .iii
(Cannon Road extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
College Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road -
Restriping and improvements
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
$1,150
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4. and 6
Yes
Zones 3. 5. 8 and 24
Financing Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2, 3. 4 or 6. the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard,
the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3. 4 or 6 by imposing Condition 2.j.iii.
(Cannon Road extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.j.iii. (Cannon Road extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the
City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of a final map for Finance Area 2, 3.4 or 6. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the Financial Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimbursemeu
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 2, 3. 4 or 6 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
194 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
Circulation Condition
2.j.iv
(Cannon Road extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
Cannon Road from eastern Zone boundary to
El Camino Real - two lanes in each direction
$3,247,000
Cannon Road West Fee Program. CFD No. 1,
TransNet Funds, Developer Funding
Payment of Cannon Road West Fee prior to
issuance of a Building Permit or Improvement
Agreement prior to Final Map Recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7
Yes
Zones 3. 5. 8. 15 and 24
Financh Mechanism
A portion of the inside lanes and certain frontage improvements for Cannon Road from the eastern
Zone boundary to El Camino Real are anticipated to be funded by the proposed Cannon Road
West Fee program. Other funding sources are Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 and
TransNet Funds. Frontage improvements are anticipated to be funded by adjacent development.
except within General Plan Open Space which is included in the fee program.
The Zone 13 Finance Areas, and portions thereof, included in the proposed Cannon Road West
Fee Program are Finance Areas 1, 2,4, 5 and 7. That portion of each area required to participate
in the proposed fee program is identified in the fee study dated November 4, 1994 contained in
Appendix A-5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any project required to participate in
the fee program, the applicant shall pay the fee as determined for that project in the Cannon road
West Fee Program.
In the event that the Fee Program is not adopted, alternative funding mechanisms (e.g. bonds.
letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees, etc.) may be used without
amendment to this document, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Guarantee
Payment of Cannon Road West Fee prior to building permit issuance. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 by
imposing Condition 2.j.iv (Cannon Road extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate
tentative map(s).
Zone 13 LFMP 195 October 1995
In the event that the Cannon Road West Fee Program is not adopted prior to issuance of a building
permit for affected Finance .4reas. the propeny owner(s) may provide an alternative financial
mechanism equivalent to the fee amount. subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimburseme nt
If the developer(s) of Finance Area 1. 2. 4. 5 or 7 is required to construct the above
improvements. they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.031 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
In addition, if the developer(si of Finance Areas 1. 2. 1. 5 or 7 is required to install the
improvements mentioned above. that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly
reiated to the installation of these improvements to the estent that funds are available from the
Cannon Road West Fee Program. subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Circulation Condition
2.j.v
(Cannon Road extended)
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Facility also required by:
El Camino RealXannon Road - Traffic signal
and improvements
$340,000
TIF. PFF, Developer Funding
Payment of TIF and PFF fee at issuance of
building permit and/or Improvement Agreement
prior to Final Map recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7
Zones 3. 5. 8 and 24
Financing Mechanism
A portion of the above improvements are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program as
being funded by TIF and PFF fees. The remainder of the improvements is anticipated to be
funded through developer funding. If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or
7, these improvements have not been installed and the City Engineer determines that these
facilities are necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard,
the developer of the applicable Finance Area shall front the construction of the needed
improvements.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can
ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 4, 5 or
7 by imposing Condition 2.j.v (Cannon Road extended) as a'condition of approval on the
appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 2.j.v (Cannon Road extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City
Engineer. shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 197 October 1995
imbursemeu
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
In addition, if the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 or 7 is required to install the
improvements mentioned above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly
related to the installation of these improvements to the extent that funds are available from Traffic
Impact Fee revenues. The schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the availability of unobligated TIF and PFF funds.
Zone 13 LFMP 198 October 1995
Circulation Condition
3a
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanisms
Guarantee
Reimbursement
Participating Finance
Areas
Cannon Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps -
restriping and add an eastbound leftlturn lane
and northbound exclusive right-turn lane
$4,600
TIF, Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
TIF
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7
A portion of the above improvements are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program as
being funded by TIF fees. The remainder of the improvements is anticipated to be funded through
developer funding. If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7, these
improvements have not been installed and the City Engineer determines that these facilities are
necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard, the developer
of the applicable Finance Area shall front the construction of the needed improvements.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can
ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or
7 by imposing Condition 3a (Cannon Road extended) as a condition of approval on the
appropriate tentative map@).
Condition 3a (Cannon Road extended) referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City
Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the
developer prior to the recordation of the applicable final map. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with SectiQn 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Zone 13 LFMP 199 October 1995
In addition, if the developer@) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 is required to install the
improvements mentioned above, that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly
related to the installation of these improvements to the extent that funds are available from Traffic
Impact Fee revenues. The schedule for reimbursement shall be based on the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the availability of unobligated TIF funds.
Zone 13 LFMP 200 October 1995
Circulation Condition
3b
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Palomar Airport Road/I-5 Northbound Ramps - restriping
$1,725
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 6
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2. 3, 4 or 6. the City Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard,
the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3. 4 or 6 by imposing Condition 2.j.ii
(Cannon Road extended) as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 3.b. referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of a final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6. The improvement agreement shall be
in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 30.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds. cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 201 October 1995
Circulation Condition
3c
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanisms
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
~
Paseo del NorteKannon Road - add an
eastbound left-turn and a westbound through
lane
$27,000
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7
FinancinP Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6, or 7, the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6, or 7 by imposing Condition 3b as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 3b referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of a final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6, or 7. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Reimbursemeu
If the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 are required to construct the above
improvements, they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP 202
Circulation Condition
3d
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanisms
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road -
restriping and add an eastbound exclusive right-
turn lane
$2,300
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4 and 6
Financ’ ing Mecm
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6, the City Engineer deterniines that this
improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard.
the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6 by imposing Condition 3c as a
condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 3c referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of a final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4 or 6. The improvement agreement shall be
in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 203 October 1995
Circulation Condition
3e
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanisms
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
El Camino RealKannon Road - restriping and
add an eastbound exclusive right-turn lane
$6,325
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recorda tion
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7, the City Engineer determines that
this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance
Standard, the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to, be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition 3d
as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition 3d referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of a final map for Finance Area 1. 2, 5, 6 or 7. The improvement agreement shall
be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds. cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Zone 13 LFMP 204 October 1995
Circulation Condition 3f
1 Facility also required by:
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Zones 3, 5, 8 and 24
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Reimbursement
Cannon Road from eastern Zone boundary to
El Camino Real - two lanes in each direction
$3,247,000
Cannon Road West Fee Program, CFD No. 1.
TransNet Funds, Developer Funding
Payment of Cannon Road West Fee prior to
issuance of a Building Permit or Improvement
Agreement prior to Final Map Recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 5, and 7
A portion of the inside lanes and certain frontage improvements for Cannon Road from the eastern
Zone boundary to El Camino Real are anticipated to be funded by the proposed Cannon Road
West Fee program. Other funding sources are Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 and
TransNet Funds. Frontage improvements are anticipated to be funded by adjacent development,
except within General Plan Open Space which is included in the fee program.
The Zone 13 Finance Areas, and portions thereof, included in the proposed Cannon Road West
Fee Program are Finance Areas 1. 2, 5 and 7. That portion of each area required to participate
in the proposed fee program is identified in the fee study dated November 4, 1994 contained in
Appendix A-5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any project required to participate in
the fee program, the applicant shall pay the fee as determined for that project in the Cannon road
West Fee Program.
In the event that the Fee Program is not adopted, alternative funding mechanisms (e.g. bonds,
letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, development impact fees, etc.) may be used without
amendment to this document, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
Guarantee
Payment of Cannon Road West Fee prior to building permit issuance. In addition, if determined
to be needed at time of development and if not already constructed, the City can ensure this
improvement will be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 5 or 7 by imposing
Condition 3e as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
In the event that the Cannon Road West Fee Program is not adopted prior to issuance of a building
permit for affected Finance Areas, the property owner(s) may provide an alternative financial
Zone I3 WMP 205 October 1995
mechanism equivalent to the fee amount, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, Financial
Management Director and City Attorney.
If the developer(s) of Finance Area 1, 2. 5 or 7 is required to construct the above improvements.
they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
In addition. if the developer(s) of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5 or 7 is required to install the
improvements mentioned above. that developer(s) shall receive reimbursements for costs directly
related to the installation of these improvements to the extent that funds are available from the
Cannon Road West Fee Program, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Ociober 1995 Zone I3 LFJIP 206
Sewer Condition B
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
Extension of 10" Sewer Main in Future
Cannon Road
$234,600
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Financing Areas 1, 2. 5, and 7
Financirag Mecm
If at the time of development of Financing Areas 1, 2, 5 or 7, the District Engineer determines
that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer of that
Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 5 or 7 by imposing Co'ndition B as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 5 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured ith
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
207 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMP
/I Water Condition B1
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
Minimum 12" Water Main in Future Cannon
Road
$97,200
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Financing Areas 1, 2. 3. 4, 5, 6, and 7
Mechanism
If at the time of development of Financing Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6, or 7, the District Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer
of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Areas 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 by imposing
Condition B1 as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B1 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 LFMP 208 October 1995
Water Conditions B2
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee I
Pressure Regulating Station
$75.000
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas Finance Areas 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Financin? Mecm
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 the District Engineer
determines that these improvements are necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the
developer of that Finance Area shall finance their construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Conditions
B2 as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B2 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 LFMP 209 October 1995
Water Condition B3
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
8'' Reclaimed Water Line in LegolArmada Dr.
$101,250
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6 and 7
Financing Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 the District Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer
of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3. 4, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition
B3 as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B3 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 LFMP 210 October I995
Water Condition B4
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 the District Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the' developer
of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
16" Water Main in future Armada Drive
$1 12,500
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at the time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will
be constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 by imposing Condition
B4 as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B4 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3. 4. 5, 6 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 W;MP 21 1 October 1995
Water Condition B5
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
10" Water Main in future Leg0 Drive
$48,000
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recorda tion
Finance Area 4
Financing - Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Area 4 the District Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer of that Finance Area
4 shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area by imposing Condition B5 as a condition of
approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B5 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 4. The improvement agreement shall be
in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the General
Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 LFMP 212 October 1995
/I Water Condition B6
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
12" Water Main extending from Hidden Valley
Road to Cannon Road
$75.600
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6 and 7
Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 the District Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer
of that Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4. 5. 6 or 7 shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area by imposing Condition B5 as a condition of
approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B5 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer. shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6 or 7. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone I3 LFMP 2 13 October 1995
Water Condition B7
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Financing
Areas
8" Minimum water main in future D Street
$56,700
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
Finance Areas 2
, recordation
Me-
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2 the District Engineer determines that this
improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer of that Finance Area
2 shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area by imposing Condition B5 as a condition of
approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition B5 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 2. The improvement agreement shall be
in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the
following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable to the General
Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
Zone 13 LFMP 214 October 1995
Water Condition C 1
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
Financing Mectunkm
Relocation of the existing 16" Water Main
from existing reservoir to 16" line in PAR
$180,OOO
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
If at the time of development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, the District Engineer determines
that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the developer of that
Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by imposing Condition C1 as
a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition C1 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
215 October 1995 Zone 13 LFMB
Water Condition C2
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
16" Water Line in future Armada Drive
$145,000
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Fina
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Financing Mechanism
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, the District Engineer
determines that this improvement is necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the' developer
of that Finance Area shall finance its construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3. 4, 5, or 6 by imposing Condition C2
as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition C2 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
216 October 1995 Zone I3 w;MP
Water Condition C3
Estimated Cost
Financing Mechanism
Guarantee
Participating Finance
Areas
8" Reclaimed Water Main in future Armada
Drive, future Leg0 drive and Paseo del Norte
$190,3 50
Developer Funding
Improvement Agreement prior to Final Map
recordation
Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Financb Mecm
If at the time of development of Finance Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, the District Engineer
determines that these improvements are necessary to accommodate that Finance Area, the
developer of that Finance Area shall finance their construction.
Guarantee
If determined to be needed at time if development, the City can ensure this improvement will be
constructed with the development of Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by imposing Condition C3
as a condition of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s).
Condition C3 referenced above, if determined to be needed by the District Engineer, shall be
constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the
recordation of the applicable final map for Finance Area 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. The improvement
agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section
20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with
one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit, acceptable
to the General Manager and legal counsel to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
October 1995 Zone I3 WMP 217
I. REFERENCES
"Capital Improvement Program," 1994-1995 to Build Out.
"Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan," City of Carlsbad, Revised September 29, 1986.
"Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan"
The City of Carlsbad, California." Carlsbad Engineering Dept., Fraser Engineering, INC.,
Cooper Engineering Associates, March 1994
"Guidelines and Instructions for the Preparation of Local Facilities Management Plan
Transportation Impact Studies, " Engineering and Planning Departments, City of Carlsbad.
February 9, 1988.
"Master Plan of Sewerage" City of Carlsbad, Wilson Engineering, January, 1992.
"Water Master P1an"Project 89-105, CMWD, January, 1991
"Water Reclamation Master Plan, " Dudek & Associates, Draft Date January, 1990.
Zone 13 LFMP 218 October 1995
APPENDICES
A-1 Constraints Map
A-2 LIBRARY
"'-
MTQ. mta7
DER. LIB
J0 S.' '
OEPT. HD.' ftttE: LIBRARY SITE AND FUNDING RECOMJ6E3- DATION FOR A NEW LIBRARY IN SOUTH CARLSBAD
1. Approve the recoPlmended library site and direct the City Manager to negotiate a purchase agreement vieh che ovaer:.
2. Direct the City Manager to include funds in the CIP for land acquisition and
coostructfon of a library.
3. Direct the City Manager to evaluate alternative methods of financing and
constructing the library (developer build VI. City build).
ITEH gCPUNATION:
On January 27, 1987 tb City Council directed staff to negociate.the acqufsttic?.
of a library rite and/or a developer ptoposal to build and lease back a library
facility. report which listed five sites for consideration. All five sites met the
selection criteria recommended in the Library Strategic Plan. Subsequent investigation and negotiations with Carlsbrd Retail Associates has resulted Fn
the selection of a preferred site.
selection codttee endorsed Site E as the besc site for a nev library.
Ubrrry board also has endorsed the site. appears to be consistent vith ochrr property in the area.
Council action vas based upon the library site selection cornmitcee
At its meeting of April 16, 1987 the site
rne The rsklng price for the property
.
Design funds of $650,000 are already budgeted in the CIP.
vill occur upon purchase of the site. Design of the buildi.:
Purchase is anticipated during 1988.
The City ha8 several a€teraatives available for funding the acquirleion of a new Ubrrry.
both existing and future, to this project. The ultimate decision on exactly how
to financa the coartnrctioa vill determine che extent of pubLic facilitias fees
committed to tho profrct in future years and the effect the Library wfll have on the timing of othrr improvements.
tha folloving tabla:
Descrfptioa
ALl optionr depend on the City pladging public facflitics fee funds,
The library project costs are ~unmarized in
Piscar 4prOXht8 Year hunt Received -
Land Acquisition 1988-89 $1 . 1 million
Grading 88-89 0.9 millioa
Design 88-89
Construction 89-90 to 90-91
Total Project Cost $11.0 million
0.6 dlion
8.4 million
Operations 90-91 and thete8fter
$0.5 to 0.9 million
PUrCb. of the 1ibr.V site and funding grading costs prior to 1989-90 may
require dedication of a11 8v8ilable public facilities fee revenues for 1987-88 and delay of certain existing PFF projects.
includes Palomar Airport Road improvements, park Imptovements in the northeast and southwest quadrants, the Public Safety Center phase If and If1 and many
smaller profec:s.
The list of ptojects to be delayed
This delay in funding other Fmprovernents is brought on by reduced
PFF revenue due to the slowing of development activity. Existlng resources must be allocated to only top priority projects.
Staff is recolmnending that Council reserve funds for the acqulsfcion
of land and grading costs from 1987-88 revenue (assuming 87-88
revenues are sufficient to covet these and other committed costs). Actual purchase of the property would aot occur until 1988-89.
The long term financing of the building construction costs could be
done in one of three ways:
1. Building construction funded by sitr developer with lease back
agreement = under this concept the City vould enter lnto a
lease back agreement with the sitr developer to build the
library to City specifications. The City would then enter into
a long term lease back agreement with the developer pledging up
to $1 million per year of public facilities fee revenue to lease
payments The actual Lease payments vi11 depend 00 construction costs and interest rates during this 20
year period. By allowing the site developer to build the build-
ing, the City may be able to lower total construction costs by taking advantage of certain economies of scale.
over a 20 year period.
2. Certificates of Participation - The City may issue Certificates
of Participation for the coustruction of the building.
public facilities fee fund wuld be pledged, along with City
genaral fund revenues, to the repayment of the debt, as in the
above approach the library debt vould have first claim of PFF
revenues. This alternative offers the City a lower interest rate due to our ab%lity to issue tax exempt debt. Repayment
vould require up to $1 million per year for 20 years; however,
due to lower interast rates, the actual cost to the City could
be slightly less than alternative 01.
The
3. Hello-Roos District Reimbureemcnt - Under this alternative the
City must put together a series of financing steps.
building could be constructad by the site developer or by the
City through the use of Mello-Roos tax exempt debt.
case the ultimate cost of the building -auld be supported by the
could have the annual assestkent placed upon their district reduced by the amount of public facilities fees payed by that
developer. The cost to the City is limited eo the amount of
public facilities fees paid by developers within the district.
Any shortfall could be assessed against property with the
dir trlc t .
First, the
In either
. MelZo-Roos district. The developers supporting the distric:
Council is not required to select a funding alternative at this time.
However, an understandlng of the alternatives is necessary before the City moves forward with the project.
financing methods are I) Public facilities fees ar,e pledged co repay che
Two important points found in all
Page 3
AB NO. &,,7 -P/
cost of the building and, 2) The City will be delaying many public
facilities fee projects to make way for library funding.
The CfP which vi11 be presented to Council in the next few months will
detail the fiscal impact of thii project.
development of 400 to 600 dwelling units per year to fund the library
cons truc t ion.
The City will require
The operating costs for the new library vi11 run from $500,000 to
$900,000 per year depending on the level of operations. The City
presently fs unable to support this additional cost. Preliminary projections of General Fund revenue show that an operating deficit of
about $1.5 million will exist in 199041, the first year of operations
for this facility.
zone fees assessed against development to cover operating costs for
the first year or two of operations.
The Cfty must consider revenue enhancements or
EXHIBITS :
1. Memo from Library Director to Site Selection Committee dated
April 16, 1987.
2. Site plan.
3. Letter from Johnson Wax Development Corporation to Frank Hamen
date Juna 26, 1987.
4. Site map.
APRIL 16, 1987
TO: SITE SEtEC.TION COMMITTEE
FROM: Library Of rector
LI8RARY 5 ITE SELECTION PROGRESS REPORT
Library and city staff have had six meetings with the developers who plan to build a shopping center on El Camino Real between Alga Road and Oove Lane. the development of a tentative sfte plan for a library building. The next step will be to develop a final site plan.
The additfon of the new post office to this general site plan has caused some of the revisions we have developed. That has also required the developers to purchase an auditional seven acres of land to accommodate both the library and the post office. The developers are fn the process of purchasing the property at this time. financial data to purchase the sfte and the buildfng. The fol ow- fng optfons appear to be possible:
The result of those meetfngs has been
s
We have also been working with some preliminary
1. Purchase the land from the developer and lease back the bu fng.
2. Lease back the rind and the building.
1 d-
3.
Any one or a combination of these optfons may be feasible. work needs to be done on various financing alternatives.
Purchase outrtght the land and the building from the developer after the bufldfng is built. .
More
Thfs proposed site appears to be the best possible site for the library fn the southern half of the city. The combination of a shopping center, post office and library will make for an ideal mix and should provide a convenient source of services to the publlc. The sfte satfsffes all the major criteria we have used to evaluate varfous potentf a1 1 i brary sites .
b
PA8
01 stri bu tf on :
Geoff Amour John Cahfll Bebe Grosse Mi chae 1 Ho 1 zm i T 1 e r Ann Kulchin
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB#-
MTQ. 4/10/9o
OEM.
APPROVAL 'OF ARCHITECT AGREEMENT FOR
CARLSBAD LIBRARY PROJECT
DEW. HD. LIBRARY DESIGN SERVICES AND APPROVAL OF INCREASED PROGRAM SPACE FOR THE ctn
In the 1989-90 Capital Improvement Program budget, the City Council appropriated funds and directad staff to begin the preliminary work for the design of the Carlsbad Library Project including an
analysis of the uristinq Cole Library facility. Attached is an agreement with the recammendad architectural firm of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates in cooperation with James McGraw and Associates for the design of the Carlsbad Library Project and the
feasibility study and analysis of the Cole Library building.
In 1986, tha City Council adopted me Stwc Pl- for Sbaca Nee- which identified a 58,000 square foot library facility
to be located in the southern part of Carlrrbad. This report also identified tha eventual expansion of tha uristing Cole Library facility of an additional 20,000 to 25,000 square feet at buildout. The current work of the City's Consulting Librarian, Mr. David R. Smith, has concluded that a building program of 58,600 square feet for the proposed new library building is the established square footage to house all current and projected space requirements. Kr. Smith recommends a total program space of 64,000 square feet to more effectively and efficiently meet the Fncreasing library space needs of the new Carlsbad Library facility. Attached are several axhibits which addrasu these subjects in more datail. At this City Council meeting, City staff and the consultants will make a presentation regarding several issues facing the Proposed Carlsbad Library facility.
FISCAL:
The total valua of tha design sewices for the project is $928,255. The City Council ha8 previously appropriated a total of $3,806,000
for the prmliminary work including final dasign for the Carlsbad Library Project with funds appearing in Projact Account No. 320- 820-1810-3244. Staff recommonds the approval of the attached consulting agreement and commencement of the design of the project.
Attached is a memorandum from the Fhanca Director dated April 5,
1990, outlining several: potential funding alternatives for the construction of the project estimated to range between $14.2 million to SlS.1 million. The Finance Director will be present at this Council meeting and assisting in the presentation regarding this subject.
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. /tTtC?78 .
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 ..
6.
Location map.
April 3, 1990 memo from the Municipal Projects Manager to the
City Manager regarding the status of the proposed Carlsbad Library Project.
Letter from David R. Smith, Library Building Consultant, dated February 10, 1990.
April 2, 1990 memorandum from the Finance Director to the Municipal Pro] ects Manager regarding funding alternatives for the proposed Carlsbad Library Project.
Resolutfon No . Tcm 3 approving an architectural consultant
agreement with the firm of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates for library design services and authorizing the increase of program space for the Carlsbad Library Project.
Consultant agreement.
-.
LOCATION MAP
\
\ \ \ \
+ROJECT NAME PROJECT #
SOUTH CARLS8AD LIBRARY 3244
ALGA
EXHl8lT
1
z 0
LANE
ROAD
April 3, 1990
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM : Municipal Projects Manager
STATU8 OF CARLSBAD LIBRARY PROJECT
The following is a status report regarding the proposed Carlsbad
Library Pro j ect . The following issues are addressed:
Brief history of the project and work of the Library Building
Review Committee .
e Architect selection process, design agreement, and
recommendation.
e n for T,ibrarv SBac e Needs and Summary of 1986 Strateuic Pla City's Consulting Librarian, David R. Smith's 1990 Building
Program .
e Project cost estimates.
e Finance Director's analysis of funding alternatives.
RECENT PROJECT HIST ORY
In the 1989-90 Capital Improvement Programbudget, the City Council appropriated funds and directed staff to begin the preliminary work for the design of the Carlsbad Library Project including an analysis of the existing Cole Library facility. On May 23, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-173 approving a purchase agreement for the acquisition of a six (6) acre site along the western extension of Dove Lane, west of El Camino Real. On July
18, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-254 approving
a consultant agreement with Mr. David R. Smith, Consulting
Librarian, to assemble a detailed City library building program and
provide assistance and input into the selection of an architect for the project.
The City Council approved Library Building Review Committee composed of two (2) City Council Members, one (I) member of the Planning Commission, representatives of the Library Board of Trustees, Friends of the Library, three (3) citizens at large, and City staff was assembled to act as an advisory group, provide input? and review of the building program, and make recommendations to the Library Board of Trustees and City Council regarding the selection of an architect team to design the Carlsbad Library Project and the
feasibility study for the Cole Library facility. For the past several months, the Library Building Review Committee conducted an
extensive selection process to identify an architectural consultant
to provide design services for this project.
April 3, 1990 Page 2
A--.CTI ON PROCESS. DES1 GN A GR-NT, AND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDAT1 ON
On September 29, 1989, Request for Qualification packages were mailed to fifty-nine (59) architectural firms identified as potential candidates for the project. These firms consisted of architectural firms and individuals who had formally requested
inclusion, had been recommended to the City by other governmental agencies, had specific design experience in public libraries, or had accomplished other City projects. Of this group, thirty-three
(33) architectural firms submitted materials in response to the initial request. On November 9, 1989 following a review of the submitted materials, the Library Building Review Committlre identified and recommended seven (7) firms as finalists for the design of the project. The seven (7) final firms were requested to submit a detailed project proposal and prepare a formal design presentation at an interview session before the Library Building Review Committee.
The seven (7) firms identified for the project were:
Albert C. Martin and Associates Imine Cardwell/Thomas C Associates and
Charles Walton & Associates Glendale
IBI Group Newport Beach
Ripley & Associates San Francisco
Simon, Martin-Vegue, Winklestein, Moris San Francisco
Wheeler, Wirner, Blackman San Diego
On January 18 and 19, 1990, the Library Building Review Committee
convened at the public Safety and Service Center to receive the
formal design presentations and interview each of the seven (7) final firms. Particular emphasis was placed upon a demonstration
of the firm's specific capabilities and experience in the design of public library projects. Following the completion of all seven
(7) interviews and considerable discussion, the Committee requested that staff further research and provide additional background
information on the proposed joint architectural team of
Cardwell/Thomas and Associates and James McGraw and Associates.
James McGraw & Associates Seattle/San Diego
On February 13, 14, and 15, 1990, three (3) representatives of the
Library Building Review Committee traveled to the offices of L.
Cardwell/Thomas and Associates in Seattle, Washington and held extensive meetings with members of the firm to exchange ideas and discuss the project in more detail. The meetings included site visits to other completed library projects accomplished by this firm in the greater Seattle area. Additionally, the visit included
interviews with several of the firm's subconsultants to further confirm the architect's qualifications and specific library design
April 3, 1990 Page 3
.
experience. A similar visit was made by Committee members to the offices of James McGraw and Associates in San Diego. During both of these visits, several other tours were conducted to review the firms' previously accomplished projects, including both public and academic libraries, and projects similar in detail and style desired for the Carlsbad Library Project. In addition to direct interaction with the proposed architectural team members, several
references were contacted by City staff via telephone and questioned regarding their experience in working with these firms on other projects.
On February 22, 1990, a report was presented to the Library
Building Review Committee on the research and additional background information obtained on the proposed joint architectura1,team. The
report summarized the office visits, meetings, tours, and reference
checks. It was the conclusion of the Committee representatives that the additional background information revealed that the
proposed architectural team possessed the necessary design capabilities, technical knowledge, building expertise, knowledge of current construction techniques, and axperience in public projects necessary to produce and manage complex pubLic library building projects. Additionally, the proposed architectural team has experience in design issues related to the remodeling and expansion of existing library facilities critical to the work
associated with the Cole Library facility. Following the presentation of the report, the Library Building Review Committw unanimously selected Cardwell/Thomas and Associates and James McGraw and Associates as the firm to be recommended to the City Council for design of the new Carlsbad Library project.
It is therefore the recommendation of the Library Building Review Committee and City staff that the firms of Cardwell/Thomas and Associates and James McGraw and Associates be authorized by the
City Council to proceed with the design of the project. The lead
firm for the project will be Cardwell/Thomas and Associates who
will carry out all pharres of design and have prime responsibility and overview throughout the entire project. James McGraw and Associates will work under contract to Cardwell/Thomas and
Associates to coordinate the production of the final project plans,
specifications, and contract documents. This joint arrangement will provide the project with a team that includes a firm with specific design expertise and management experience of library . projects and a firm that has very detailed technical skills and is-* able to provide local representation. Staff feels this combination
is advantageous to the administration of a successful project of this complexity.
April 3, 1990
Page 4
The consultant agreement negotiated' between City staff and Cardwell/Thomas and Associates as the prime architectural consultant requires completion of approved final project plans, specifications, and contract documents in March of 1991. The agreement includes complete architectural services, interior design, and all other required building, engineering, lighting and acoustics, and landscaping disciplines. The architects are also tasked to immediately perform a full architectural and building safety assessment including an engineering analysis of the Cole
Library building. Also to be accomplished are the exploration of alternatives and expansion options on the site as well as preparation of a written report to the City summarizing the findings .
Library design is a complex and intricate process requiring a more intense effort and higher level of architectural organization and attention to technical detail than is customarily required for the
design of other public facilities. The design process for the Carlsbad Library facility will be highly interactive and participatory. Upon the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the
architects will schedule and conduct the first in a series of workshops with staff, the Library Board, the Library Building Review Committee, and other interest groups to develop and examine
various building layouts and design alternatives. This process
will continue over a period of several weeks to reach consensus on
a final schematic design which will undergo further refinement until a clearly defined library facility design emerges. During
each design stage, the architects will also provide guidance in the
process of selecting interior and exterior building finishes, interior furniture, fixtures, operating systems, and equipment. After completion of these phases, the construction plans, specifications and contract documents will be prepared and assembled and the project will be presented to the City Council for authorization to bid the construction of the project. The project
will require a Conditional Use Permit to be issued by the Carlsbad Planning Commission. All other project permits and approvals have
already been obtained.
0 ACE NEEDS AND CITY ' S SUMMARY OF 198 6 STRATEGIC PLAN F R WRRARY SP CONSULTIN G LIBMY. DA VID R. SMITH @S 1990 BUILDING PR OGW
The primary guide to be used during design will be the Carlsbad Library Building Program as prepared over the past several months -*
by the- City's Consulting Librarian, Mr. David- R. Smith. Now in final form, the Library Building Program contains information On
current and future library needs and services essential to a successful public library design for the City of Carlsbad. The
document includes information such as:
April 3, 1990 Page 5
. Functional facility design criteria.
An analysis and summary of all public and staffing space, shelving, and seating allowances. . An analysis and summary of each functional space including area requirements, aesthetics, general environmental and economic considerations, types and locations of collection
materials, and specific descriptions of equipment,
furnishings, and furniture to be installed in the building.
acoustics, computer layout, technical/support service requirements, restrooms, maintenance space, and related
issues .
0 General architectural requirements including lighting and
In 1986, the City Council adopted the st rate^ SDace Needs . This report identif ied a prelimin-rogE space of 58,000 square feet for a library facility in the southern
part of the city. This allocation of space was accomplished through a very preliminary analysis of existing. and proposed library functions, creation of shared spaces between functions and
facilities, and significantly reduced unassigned building space. Further, the 1986 analysis did not take into consideration the
location, functional size, and net-space requirements for other facilities within the library buildings such as larger auditoriums
and meeting rooms, public service areas, introduction of public
arts elements, expansion capabilities for new programs, etc. Minimal allowance of unassigned building space including space designated for interior walls, hallways, restrooms, maintenance areas and building equipment rooms was not definitively identified
in the detail necessary to support a preliminary building program.
Both the City's Library Building Consultant and City staff are
concerned that a minimal allowance of unassigned building space
commonly results in a utilitarian style building lacking in the open atmosphere, depth, receptivity, and ambiance that is critical to successful public library design, Both the consultants and staff feel strongly that the 58,000 square foot assigned space for
the proposed library facility that was developed in the 1986 report, although functional, will not yield the quality library
facility, over the long term, that is expected of the project.
Further, a review of the 1986 Stratnuic P1a shows that the" conceptual library space of 58,000 square feet was based solely on an estimated library space per capita, as opposed to the current Library Building Program which is based on current information gathered from the primary users of the proposed Carlsbad Library. During the programming phase of this project, the lQhhlU
established square footage for the new library building was 58,600
square feet. This included reductions in square footages in
br
April 3, 1990 Page 6
several areas otherwise requiring additional space and an allocation of only 222 unassigned space for the entire building.
Attached for the City Council's information and review is a letter dated February 10, 1990, from the City's Consulting Librarian, Mr. David R. Smith, recommending an increase in the library program space for the new Carlsbad Library building of 5,400 square feet (a 6,000 square foot increase over the 1986 mteuic Plqn report)
for a total program space of 64,000 squarm feet. The 5,400 square foot increase, representing a 9.21 increase in square footage, is proposed to be redistributed among those library functions rarliar reduced in the Building Program and would increase the unassigned building space to a more satisfactory derrign level for a facility of this size.
The increase of program space for the new Carlsbad Library would also beneficially impact the proposed expansion of the Cole
Library. The original concept of the 1986 mteuic Plq~l was to house certain library administrative functions, including administration and technical semrices, at the new Carlsbad Library facility until expansion of the existing Cole Ubrary facility. At that the, these administrative functions would then relocate
back to the Cole Library. With an increase in program space at this time, these administrative functions will remain permanently at the new library facility making available additional public
library space at the Cole Library. City staff considers thio to be a major organizational, functional, and economic advantage to relocating the administrative and technical operations of the
library only one (1) time. The established library standards under the City's Growth Management Plan require the construction of an
additional 20,000 to 25,000 square feet of library space at
buildout. This expansion spaca is proposed to occur at the Cole Library building. Under the proposed approach to -and the new library building to 64,000 square feet, this increase would yield
nearly equal public library spaces fn both the new building and the
Cole Library building at buildout.
Staff has investigated the effects an increased program space of
5,400 square feet would have on parking requirements for the new facility. while tha City has no adopted parking requirement standard for libraries, the parking currently designated for the project (3SO spaces) is adequate for a 64,000 square foot facility based on figures used satisfactorily on a number of other library
buildings of this size. The City also has the option to design a . full or partial two-story facility that would create additional -. space for parking. This and other options will continue to be explored by the architect and the Library Building Review Committee as preliminary development of the building site evolves.
The concept of increasing the program space to 64,000 square feet for the new Carlsbad Library was discussed and unanimously endorsed
by the Library Building Review Committee at their meeting of February 22, 1990. In conclusion, staff recommends the City Council authorize the increase in program space for the new Carlsbad Library facility from 58,000 square feet to 64,000 square feet.
April 3, 1990
Page 7
The following summarizes the estimated project budget for both a
58,600 square foot facility and a 64,000 square foot facility:
Land purchase and site improvements Library Programming Services Architectural Design Services: - New Carlsbad Library Design - Cole Library Study - Reimbursable Expenses Construction at $135 per square foot
Construction contingency (101)
Furnishings, fixtures and equipment at
$25 per square foot Collection development
Construction management: - Architectural oversight - Resident inspection services - Special building inspection
of structural steel, elevator, and related building issues
Utility service fees and connections City project management Title, appraisal, and legal work . Miscellaneous including document
reproduction, dedication plaques,
dedication ceremonies, photographs and exhibits, etc.
- Soiis and materials testing
$ 2,300,000
45,000
795 I 750
50 I 000
82,505
7,911,000
791,100
1,465,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
2s, 000
25,000
75,000
65,000
10,000
35,000
$ 2,300,000
45,000
795,750
50,000
82,505 a, 640, ooo
864, ooo
1,600,000
200,000
150,000
100 I 000
25,000
2s, 000
75,005
65, OCG
10,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET $14,125,355 $15,062,255
Attached is a memo dated April 2, 1990 from the Finance Director discussing the potential funding alternatives for the library project taking into account increased square footage and updated budget estimates. Three (3) potential funding alternatives are identified in which the Council, during the upcoming CIP review,
Will be asked to approve one (1) or a combination of the following:
-,
. . Increase tax rates under the proposed Mello-Roos District.
0 Delay and/or reprioritize projects in the Capital
Improvement Program. . Contribute funds from the General Fund to the project.
April 3, 1990
Page 8
With respect to the current status of the project and the design contract at hand, the total value of the design services for the project is $928,255. The City Council has previously appropriated a total of $3,806,000 for the preliminary work including final design and property acquisition for the Carlsbad Library Project with funds appearing in Project Account No. 320-820-1810-3244.
Staff recommends the approval of the attached consultins aqreement -- and commencement of the design of the project. m
Jomy WILL Muni pal Projects Manager
JJC: jkb
Enc 1 osure
c: Assistant City Manager Finance Director Community Development Director Library Director City Engineer Ken Quon, Project Manager
-.
Fm: David R. Smith, Condthg Librarian
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
2/10/90 REVISED TO 64,000 Square Feet
PUBLIC SERVICES AND RELATED AREAS
1.0 pUBrrC EM"CULOBSY/ntspLA~*
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.11 Am
2.12 Soppage (grand piano. paiium. AVl e)
[+t,ooO] 2.550
200
220
[+l,OOo] 2,000
so
50
(+250] 2.250
150
(+2501 2,400
1 * 300 . -. 1,000
150
150
1.
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
3.1 CirruiatiOnDeskArca
3.11 Ckk-in(1)
3.12 Chechut(3)
3.13 R-Ibtbqui~~ - (2)
3.14 Matedab Shelving - Staff Atxm
3.15 secrpaYSystmJQucUingArur
3.2 Ckulatian Staff Wark Room
3.21 Reshdving Area- (2-3)
3.22 WdSt?rrinrU - (&a)
3.24 S~C - Suvpfies
3.23 ConecQilshChring
3.4 AAstant Cihuladal supcrwois omct
4.0 mm
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4. s
4.6
Assigned
bal!Lk
uu
1,000
200
500
200
100
U&gIled
9 50
300
450
100
100
125
I25
[+ZOO] O.!OO
[+3001 3,200
('ZOO] 1.400
[+200] 300
100
ZOO
1.000 -.
300
5 50
150 Unassiwed
2.
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
5.1 Public CoiIeEtion Shelving - 4,000 itmu
5.2 UsSeating- 12
5.3 Young Aduit CaIleCtion
5.3 1 Public C~flcdon 2,500 itcmrtmagazines
5.32 Us~rscating-6
5.41 Boob, M~@IIc~, Sa- Aha
5.42 Friends Work Room
6.0 &.~&oVjgaalllpllogiqIl
6.1 Public conection Sheiving - 20,000 items
7.4 1 MsiP Termjm&(s) 10 of 30
7.42 adaryTcrnrinaL 10 of 30
7.5
7.6
Study Roolzu (4) - 48
Word- *crocomp~tcr/l)pmg Rm - 4
7.7 Machines - (#l , #2*' #3 copy macfrines of 4 total)
200
200
300
200
(+loo] 400 (+2OO] 600
500 [+300] 500
500
1.509
1,500
1.300
[+300] 1,050
(+300] 1,000
200
-, 200
150
3.
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
8.0 -- - Cum
9.2 Us~rktbg-40
9.3 Pubiic Am ratalag - PAC (4 Of 16)
9.5 RcfaarecDakAKa
9.51 RdaaracscrViaCh-(3)
9.52 T-Rdarna -(1)
9.53 Dat&meSea&ngSatial-(2)-2
9.54 laminnyb-(l)
9.6 1 srrdt W& Ar# (6)
9.62 M SbrkShehmg Aha
9.63 Stonage - Suppk
9.64 Referen- SCrviaJ supemism omoe (1)
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES SPACE
750
50
150
(+300] 1,050
ooo
150
200
150
400
600
[+300] UOO
1,200
1 ,tDO
200
[+300] 2,000
700
.. 400
100
1 so
a so -.
[+2,8501 39,050
4.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT STAFP/NON PUBLIC AREAS
.. 10.0 -tl ‘VI? mice
10.1 RcceptioaAreri
11
10.11 v2titormg.2
10.12 Rmti~d~t-(I)
10.2 Adurh&mNesSemaryAha
11.4 Collection-Bo&T&andShebmg
11.5 StQsge - Suppiiu
11.6 Technical Hm Suprvlsor’~ - (1)
, 11.7 conrputcrRoam-(1)
11.8 Conaionscomkamf 5 Arca - (2)
law
1 so
50
1 00
406
150
250
250
450
200
150
200
U-Ui
3.200
500
600
600
100
200
300
300
12.11 work AlTa (2)
12.12 DcPkRm(1)
12.13 Rdg soOth(1)
12.14 Video ' CmtmiRoom(1)
12.2 Rograamand&hibits
. 13.0 Staff Aiurp
13.1 SMbmma~
13.3 SmW- lo0
13.4 Staffbmge/BreakRom
13.41 Vading Mad P e Area
13.42 KitchedFa &mim
13.44 Rmt Aidcat Room
13.43 * Aha-16
14.1 croaed Smk Aha - General COllmion compact
Sheiving - 1 S,OOO itcrm
1.700
700
250
1 so
100
200
1.000
300
300
400
e9p
Unassigned
UXlEESigned
150
7 50
100
I so
430
50
- 700
sa
200
6.
CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY
15.0 m-1-
15.1 MerUCopyMa3rinJReccl 'ving Room - (3)
15.2 Defivcryhoecfing
15.21 Dodr
15.22 Refwe cOrrectionlstorage
1 5.3 Maintmazle staff work Are4s)
15.3 1 Gend Work - (2)
15.32 Supplies Stump
15.4 cloact(~) - 3 (DiSUlbUtsd L#.ations) (3)
Pubk Area
TUT'LL CiROSS BUILDING AREA
200
100
200
200
1.200
3 50
300
400
150
UIMSi@Cd
9,580
[ +2: 850 J 7%. c4a
[+2,850] 58,550
[+2,550] 15.450
[+?,400] 64,000
-.
7.
CARLSBAD CI"Y LIBRARY
-OR SPACES - On the Library Si
16.0
16.1 plats
16.2 Pasengergnckql-
16.3 Aa#soobookhnan
16.4 he-
17.0 -
18.0
1.500.
1,000
500
306 50 L 18.1 Car
18.2 Motacydc 8 2
18.3 Bicyde - Racks at the enw ot stafkmy 15 10
18.4 Libraryvefiida-a- 2-3
-.
8.
April 2, 1990 RECEIVED
TO: MUN IC I PAL PROJECTS MANAGER
FROM: Finance Director
U N IClPA L PROJECTS
DIVISION
FUNDING FOR THE MAIN LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
The 1989-90 Capital Improvement Program includes a project which would construct a 58,000 square foot library in south Carlsbad. The funding of this project would be dependent upon the issuance of Certificates of Participation to be repaid from Public Facilities Fee (PFF) revenue over the next 20 - 25 years. The cost of this project was estimated to be approximately $12,000,000.
According to the latest design plans, the library will now range in size frx 58,600 square feet to 64,000 square feet with costs ranging from 614.2 million to $15.1 million respectively. These new costs estimates result in an increase in $2 million to $3 million over the 1989-90 Capital Improvement Program estimates.
-
As the City Council determines the ultimate site and cost of the south Carlsbad Library, one of the keys points to consider is the funding for the ultimate - project. The City Council has several alternatives as described below for dealing with the fiscal impacts of this project.
Fundi nq A1 ternat i vef
1. Citywide Me1 1 o-Roos District
The City Council is currently considering the formation of a Citywide Mello- Roos District which would include undeveloped land throughout City of
Carlsbad. The list of projects recommended for funding by the District includes the south Carlsbad Library. The estimated cost for the library construction included in the District is $10 mill ion. Current appropriations
from PFF total $3.8 million for a total funds available of $13.8 million.
58,000 sq. ft. 64,000 sq. ft. .
PFF Appropri at i on 6 3.80 million $ 3.80 million Mello-Roos District Funds 10.00 million 10.00 million
Total Funds Avai 1 ab1 e $13.80 mill ion $13.80 mill ion .
Project Cost Estimate 14.20 million 15.10 mill ion
L i brarv Li brarv
-.
Current Funding Deficit (3 .40) million (J 1.30) million
In order to fully fund the library project, the City Council would have to increase the cost estimates to the Mello-Roos District by 5400,000
to 61.3 million. An increase in project cost estimates results in an increase in total tax rates necessary to pay debt service related to these projects.
Funding for Main Library Construction April 2, 1990 Page No. 2
2. 199 0-91 CaDital ImD rovement Proaram
Even though the City is considering the inclusion of the Library project in the Mello-Roos Oistrict, there is no guarantee at this time that the
District will approved by the landowners. Therefore, the City needs to consider alternate funding methods in the event that the Oistrict cannot be formed. The 1990-91 Capital Improvement Program is currently under consideration by staff. The Library cost included in the Capital Improvement Program is roughly equal to the cost to fund the 58,000 square foot Library project. In order to fund the 64,000 foot a1 ternative, the Capital Improvement Program would have to be increased by approximately 1900,000. The funding source for the Library would remain the PFF. The increase in funding for the Library project would reduce the amount of funds available for other PFF supported projects within the CIP. This may cause delays in other projects. A more detailed analysis of this alternative will be available following the assembly of the draft Capital Improvement Program in mid to late April.
3. Ge neral Cao i tal Construction Fund Particioation
The City Council may consider the expenditure of up to $1 million of General Fund monies on the construction of the Library. Under Proposition H (Chapter 1.24 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code), the City Council may not spend more than $1 mill ion of General Fund monies on any project without previous voter approval. The City Council currently has an unobligated General Fund balance of approximately 35.5 mill ion.
Although the City Council is not being asked at this time to take an action selecting a funding alternative, it is important for the Council to understand the importance of their decision to proceed with the design of the Library. If
Council chooses to design and build the larger Library project, some change in
future capital planning will be necessary. Council will be asked to increase tax rates under the Mello-Roos Oistrict, delay projects in the Capital Improvement Program or contribute funds from the General Fund to the project. The most appropriate time for making the decision related to the funding of additional costs' for the Library project is when the Council is considering the Capital Improvement Program. At that time, all projects competing for funds will
be before the Council and each may be weighed in relation to the other for funding.
-.
JFE: tlg
c: Ray Patchett Frank Mannen C1 iff Lange
I I
4
1
I
t
r 4
t
I
IC
11
li
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
?6
27
28
library
RESOLUTION NO. 90-1Q2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ARCHITE-L CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR
BRARY DESIGN SERVICES. PROJECT NO, 3244
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has solicited proposals for
design services for the new Carlsbad Library and a
feasibility study of the Cole Library: and
WHEREAS, all prospective firms were required to submit
qualifications statements and support information; and
WHEREAS, the recommended firm possesses the necessary
skills, background and expertise to accomplish the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
previously appropriated funds for thm design of this project:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That a consultant agreement with Cardwell/Thomas .
and Associates is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf
of the City of Carlsbad.
3. Following the Mayor's signature of the agreement,
the City Clerk is further authorized and directed to forward copies
af said agreement to Cardwell/Thomas and Associates, 1221 Seqond
Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98101, and the Municipal Projects
Department for their files.
I//
I//
I//
-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1s
14: ;I
4. That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
hereby authorize the increase of program space for said building
to 64,000 square feet.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the day of , 1990,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES -- :
ABSENT:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
22
23 I; I/ 24 11 !I I 25 8
26 "
27 j
28
-.
AGREEMENT FOR
ARCBITECTURAL CONSVtT3wT 8ERVICZ8
SOUTH CARLIBAD LIB-Y DtSIGH AND
COLE LIBRARY FEASIBILITY STUDY
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 3 day of
&d , 1990, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and
CARDWELL/THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, hereinafter ref erred to as
"Consultant .
City requires the services of an architectural consultant to
provide the necessary architectural design services for preparation
of final plans and specifications for the South Carlsbad Library
md the preparation of a feasibility study for the Cole Library:
and
Consultant possesses the necessary skills, experience,
expertise, financial capabilities, and qualifications to provide
the services required by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the
mutual covenants contained herein, City and Consultant agree as
follows:
The Consultant shall provide architectural consultant serrices
to the City for the South Carlsbad Library and the Cole Library ~
Feasibility Study. Saia services shall be performed diligently,
in a professional. manner, and in accordance with the terms and
-.
conditions of this agreement under the direction of the City
Manager or his authorized representative.
2
2- - The City shall pay the Consultant in accordance with Sections
4 and 5 of this agreement upon receipt of invoices submitted by the
Consultant and approved by the City.
3. S AND COMpm
The Consultant's work under this contract will begin
immediately after receipt of notification to proceed by the City
to be followed by completion and acceptance by City of all project
working drawings, specifications, contract documents, reports, and
all permits and agency approvals for all phases of the project no
later than March 15, 1991. Extensions of time may be granted if
requested by the Consultant and agreed to in writing by the City.
In consideration of such requests, the City will give allowance for
documented and substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays
not caused by a lack of foresight on the part of the Consultant,
or delays caused by City inaction or other agencies' lack of timely
action.
The fees payable in accordance with Paragraph 5, lgPayment of
Fees," shall be as described in attached Exhibit A which is
attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as follows:
C SERV-
.
Investigation and Program Refinement $ 18,405 Schematic Design 145,890 Design Development 211,770 Contract Documents 410,890 As-built Drawings 8.795 Subtotal: Basic Services $795 , 750
OITIONAL SERVICPS
Cole Library Study
Subtotal: Additional Services
s 50.000
$ 50,000
. -.
3
0 Reimbursable Expenses
Subtotal: Reimbursable Expenses u $ 82,505
TOTAL PROJECT FEES $928,255
No other compensation for services will be allowed except
those items covered by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 7,
"Changes in Workon
It is agreed to by the parties to this agreement that work to
be performed by the Consultant and its subconsultants related to
work required during the bidding and construction phases of the
project shall be provided by a supplemental agreement.
5. -
Payment of fees shall be made within thirty (30) days after
receipt of monthly invoices submitted by Consultant and approved
by City.
Fees identified in Paragraph 4 above entitled ffBASfC SERVICES"
and "ADDITIONAL SERVICES" are to be considered as the total and
complete fees to be paid for these elements of the project by City
to Consultant. Fees identified in Paragraph 4 above entitled
"REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES" shall be paid by City to Consultant
following receipt and approval of monthly invoices sufficiently
detailed to include an itemized expenditure of actual costs
incurred by Consultant in the administration of this project for-
- the following expenses multiplied by fifteen percent (15%) * The
total reimbursable expenses to be paid by City to Consultant shall
not exceed $82,505.
4
. Travel $28, a25 . Printing, Reprographics, Reproduction 20,500
Fax, Long Distance, Express Mail, a, ooo Pro] ect Rendering 5,800 . Project Display Model 10,000
Preparation and Attendance at Public Meetings 9.380
.
.
TOTAL EXPENSES: Not to Exceed $82,505
It is understood between the parties to this agreement that
if the project is resumed after being suspended for more than sixty
(60) days, the Consultant's compensation shall be subject to
renegotiation between the parties based upon adjustments to
building rates that have occurred in the interim.
6.
final
Within fifteen (15) days of completion and approval of the
design, the Consultant shall deliver to the City the
following items:
a. One (1) complete set of final approved project plans on
mylar at scale.
b. One (1) complete camera-ready set of the final approved
project specifications.
C. All final architectural and engineering certifications
and documents. The plans shall be signed by a Licensed Architect,
Registered Civil Engineer and/or Registered Landscape Architect,
as appropriate.
d. One (1) Statement of Probable Construction Cost.
I. WGES IN WORK -.
If, in the course of this contract and design, changes seem
merited by the Consultant or the City, and informal consultations -
with the other party indicate that a change in the conditions of
.
5
the contract is warranted, the Consultant or the City may request
a change in contract. Such changes shall be processed by &a city
in the following manner: A letter ottlining the required changes
shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant to inform them of the
proposed changes along with a statement of estimated changes in
charges or time schedule. After reaching mutual agreement on the
proposal, a supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the City
and approved by the City Council. Such supplemental agreement
shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of
the agreement. Changes .requiring immediate action by the
Consultant or City shall be ordered by the City Manager who will
inform a principal of the Consultant's firm of the necessity of
such action and follow up with a supplemental agreement covering
such work.
8. -
The Consultant shall prepare the plans and specifications in
accordance with the design standards of the City of Carlsbad, State
of California, and recognized current design practices. Applicable
City of Carlsbad Standards and Regional Standards shall be used
where appropriate.
the City of Carlsbad.
Copies of such standards shall be obtained from
9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEU
The Consultant warrants that their firm has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee4
working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement,
and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee; gift, or any other consideration
6
contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of this
agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City
shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability,
or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or
consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
10. NONDISCRIIIPATTON CLAUSE
The Consultant shall Comply with the State and Federal
Ordinances regarding nondiscrimination.
11. INATION OF CONTRAa
In the event of the Consultant's failure to prosecute,
deliver, or perform the work as provided for in this contract, the
City may terminate this contract for nonperformance by notifying
the Consultant by certified mail of the termination of the
contract. The Consultant, thereupon, has five (5) working days to
deliver said documents owned by the City and all work in progress
to the City Manager or his designated representative. The City
Manager shall make a determination of fact based upon the documents
delivered to City of the percentage of work which the Consultant
has performed which is consistent with the terms of this contract,
usable, and of worth to the City in having the contract completed.
Based upon that finding as reported to the City Council, the
Council shall determine the final payment of the contract.
-. 12. DISPUTES
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work
under this agreement, the following procedure shall be used to
resolve any question of fact or interpretation not otherwise
settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they
7
become identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating
under the provisions of this-contract, shall be reduced to writing
by the principal of the Consultant or the City Manager. A copy of
such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both parties involved
along with zecommended methods of resolution which would be of
benefit to both parties. The City Manager or principal receiving
the letter shall reply to the letter along with a recommended
method of resolution within ten (10) days. If the resolution thus
obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter
outlining the dispute shall be forwarded to the City 'Council for
their resolution through the Office of the City Manager. The City
Council may then opt to consider the directed solution to the
problem. In such cases, the action of the City Council shall be
binding upon the parties involved, although nothing in this
procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to
them at law.
13. ONSmTY OF THE CONSULTANT
The Consultant is hired to render professional services of
designing and preparation of drawings for the South Carlsbad
Library Design and the Cole Library Feasibility Study. Any
payments made to Consultant are compensation solely for such
services. Consultant shall certify as to the correctness of all
designs and sign all plans, specifications, and estimates furnished
with Registered Architect's, Registered Civil Engineer's, Or 4
Landscape Architect's registration number where appropriate.
14 . SUSPENSION OR T-ATI ON OF SER VICES
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon
tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. fn
8
the event of such suspension or termination, upon request of the
city, the Consultant shall assemble the work product and put same
in order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to
City. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be paid
for work performed to the termination date: however, the total
shall not exceed the contract amount. The City shall make the
final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the
compensation to be made. Compensation to be made in compliance
with the Code of Federal Regulations.
1s. ATUS OF THE CONSUL-
The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein
in Consultant's own way as an independent Contractor and in pursuit
of Consultant's independent calling, and not as an employee of the
City. Consultant shall be under control of the City only as to the
result to be accomplished and the personnel assigned to the
project, but shall consult with the City as provided for in the
request for proposal.
The Consultant is an independent contractor of.the City. The
payment made to the Consultant pursuant to this contract shall be
the full and complete compensation to which the Consultant is
entitled. The City shall not make any Federal or State tax
withholdings on behalf of the Consultant. The City shall not be
required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of
the Consultant. .The Consultant agrees to indemnify the City fog
any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime
payment, or workers' compensation payment which the City may be
required to make on behalf of the Consultant or any employee of the
Consultant for work done under this agreement.
9
The Consultant shall be aware of the requirements of the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with
those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the
eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors
and consultants that are included in this agreement,
16 . CONFO-TY TO
The Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications to
Federal, State and
Consultant shall provide all necessary supporting documents
conform to all applicable requirements of law:
local.
and Consultant shall file said supporting documents with any
agencies whose approval is necessary.
The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any
other agencies.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and
specifications as herein required are the property of the City,
whether the work for which they are made to be executed or not.
In the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans,
specifications, drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered
forthwith to the City. Consultant shall have the right to make
one (1) copy of the plans for his/her records.
The City acknowledges the Consultant's plans and
specifications as instruments of professional service,
Nevertheless, the plans and specifications prepared under: this
agreement shall become the property of the City upon Completion Of
the work. The City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the
tonsultant against all damages, claims, and losses, including
#
defense costs, arising out 'of any reuse of the plans and
specifications without the written authorization of the Consultant.
18. HOLDHARMLESS AG-
The City, its officers, and employees shall not be liable for
any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, or any damage to goods,
properties, or effects of any parson whataver, nor for personal
injuries or death caused by, or claimed to have been caused by, or
resulting from, any intentional 01: negligent acts, errors or
omission of Consultant or Consultant's agents, employees, or
representatives. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and save
free and harmless the City and its officers and employees against
any of the foregoing liabilities or claims of any kind and any cost
and expense that is incurred by the City on account of any of the
foregoing liabilities, including liabilities or claims by reason
of alleged defects in any plans and specifications.
19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
The Consultant shall not assign this contract or any part
thereof or any monies due thereunder without the prior written
consent of the City.
20. SUBCONTRACTING
If the Consultant shall subcontract any of the work to be
performed under this contract by the Consultant, Consultant shall
be fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of -.
Consultant's subcontractor and of the persons either directly Or
indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for the
11
acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.
Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual
relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant and the City.
The Consultant shall bind every subcontractor and every
subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract
applicable to Consultant's work unless specifically noted to the
contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by the
City.
No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on
behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take
part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving of any
architectural, engineering, inspection, construction or material
supply contractor, or any subcontractor in connection with the
construction of the project, shall become directly or indirectly
interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. No
officer, employee, architect, attorney, engineer, or inspector of
or for the City who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf
of the City to exercise any executive, supervisory, or other
similar functions in connection with the performance of this
contract shall become directly or indirectly interested personally
in this contract or any part thereof.
T OR CONVERSATION 22. -.
No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent,
or employee of the City, either before, during, or after the
execution of this contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms
12
or obligations herein contained nor such verbal agreement or
conversation entitles the Consultant to any additional payment
whatsoever under the terms of this contract.
23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGM
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless
Agreement," all terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall
insure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and each of
their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and
assigns.
24. EFFECTIVE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year
first above written.
25. CONFWCT OF INTm
The Consultant shall file a Conflict of Interest Statement
with the City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad Conflict of Interest Code.
26. UJSURANCE
The Consultant shall obtain and maintain a policy of
comprehensive general liability insurance from an insurance company
authorized to be in business in the State of California, in an
insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) .
This insurance shall be in force during the life of this agreement
and shall not be cancelled without ten (10) days prior notice to -- .
the City.
13
The City shall be named as an additionally insured on this
policy. The Consultant shall furnish a certificate of said
insurance to the City within ten (lo) calendar days of the
execution of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals.
CARDWELL/THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES : CITY OF CARISBAD:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attorney
ATTESTED :
City Clerk
. -.
FEE SCHEDULE
SOUTH CARLSBAO LIBRARY DESIGN
& COLE LIBRARY STUDY
-
$10.8 IO $52.340 s77.000 $85.aoO so
.__-- I
~nci iiiw i unAL (CTA)
0 28.000 32.000 2o.ooo 0 I At ICHIl CCTUCUUFFE (CTA)
AIlCHlJECTUF3Al (MA)
INTElUO( I UESGN
SJAUCTUnAL
CIVIL
MECt 4 ANICAL
ELECl IUCAL
LANDSCAPE
LIGHTING
KOUSTICAL
COST ESrqAlING
2.485
0
890
1.050
1.130
2,040
0
0
0
0
19‘160
5.460
11.500
5,875
8.440
3.870
8.645
0
0
2.500
20.4 70
5,460
22,500
12,275
11.300
5.400
6,065
5.000
4,000
2.500
152,400
11,600
30,000
17.050
22.685
26.150
13.7m
7.025
6.750
8.500
2,200
0
2.500
1,000
1.250
1,300
545
0
0
0
1% I IMAl ED WIMOURSABLE WI’ENSES
TOTAL FEES AND ESTIMATED EXPENSES
SUBTOTAL
3ASC SEflVCEt
$225,15(3
80,00(1
204.115
22,524
7s03@4
37.a
44,w
3&760
28.785
12,025
12,750
13.500
$795,750
=OLE LIBRA6
STUDY
$15.ooo
0
7.500
0
12!000
3.000
6,500
6.000
0
0
0
0
S50.oOO
TOTAL
FEES
$240,15(
80.00(
212.211
22.W
87.39
40.N
51.a
44,760
28.785
12,025
12.750
13.500
- $845,750
I $82.505 I
I $928,255)
.I.
A-3 PARKS
VI 11-1 8
Vlll-19
PAGE 2 Of 8
April 24, 1991
- I N
VI 11-24
I
PACE 5 Of 8
Aprct 24, 1001
Vlll-26
PACE 6 Of 8
April 24, lwl
USES IN RCCREAIIOY AREAS MIRlN
IOlAL yo(-CIIV QlyD 6 AC.
VI 11-28
w 0
SRA
SRA
'( 10,561) (c)
(WA)
TOTAL
SUA
TOTAL 68,654 (c)
(SUA)
TOTAL
SRA
//
65.05 - 13.0 1
78.06
64.0 1
25.39
AQI a46
25.39
26.40
_128
31.68
26.12
54.78
65.73
52.77
171.63
34.31
205.91
168.30
A('H ES AC.X I is
KI3OUIREl) EXIST
39.58 - 36.78
76.36
623.30
16.16
-a --
- 4.80 20.96
327.30
.O .o
.O -
/
559.30
40.34 1300
s3.34
75.30
96.08 - 54.58
150.64
1,585.20
.A
+I< - >
<25.47> + 23.77
< 1-70>
+ 559.29
<9.23>
< .27>
<!)SO> _I_
+301.91
< 26.40>
< 5.28>
<31.68>
+ 533.18
< 14.44>
< ?2.39>
+ 24.16
< 75.55 > + 20.22
+ 2.02
a 55.2n>
+ l,4 16.9)
IM pol' I~SI.
(37,979)
(22,343)
(3 1,775)
(42,817)
(134.914)
A( 'It1 JS
1t14)I JIRlil)
94 '14
I 13.92
911.70
55.115
67.02
52.1 I
79.44
I5 89
95.33
79.44
107.04 - 21.41
128.45
107.04
337.27
67.45
404.72
3 37.2')
_I IH on
I_ 11.17
-
A( 'I< I .s
I* I J'I'I I I< I I
31) 20
11.73
4.3.93
.o
47.20
47.20
.o
91.25
b.(M
97.25
.o
7U.7H
.(I
-
(J -
-
- 78.78
.0
247.43
I9 71
267.16
.(I
(;I<ANI)
'I.( ) I'Al-
b9 7H
120 2')
623.30
63.36 - 4.W)
611. e6
327.30
91.25
h (MI
97.25
5 50.30
11') I2
I3.W
132.12
75.30
343 51
74 31
4 I7.H2
-
c_
I, 5~5.20
TOTAL
+I<->
<25.16> + 31.35
t 6.37
+ 524.60
+ 7.51
<6.37> + 1-14
+ 379.4 I
+ 11.81
< 9.89 > + 1.92
+ 479.86
-0 12.w
<A.4 I > + 3.67
(3 I .74)
+ 6.24
t 6.M
t $3. IO
t 1.4 I6.W
'POPULATION FIGURES PROVIDED BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT. INCI-LJDtS I>WLrl.l.lNci lfNl IJ 1'11~ I IIAVI' 111 Ill JWc I I'J HMI IS m
Revised 4/22/91
cr
AB#-
DEPT. PER
MTG. 11 /24/87
OF CARLSBAD - AGENr
TlTtk
ZONE 5 - PARK FEES
BILL
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 7307 , authorizing the collection of a
local facilities management fee for park facilities in the area defined as local facility management zone 5.
Direct staff to enter negotiations with the developers in Zone 5 for the up front construction of recreational facilities on City and/or County owned land.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On August 4, 1987, the City Council adopted the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 5. In addition, Council directed staff to return the issue of a local facilities management fee fer recreation facilities to the Parks and Recreation Commission for further study.
At the August Parks and Recreation Commission meeting a sub-
committee, consisting of Barbara Donovan and James Popovich, was
appointed to study the fee in depth. Mr. Mark Hughes was selected by the developers in zone 5 to represent their concerns.
Exhibit 1 details the sub-cornmittee'.s findings and recommenda-
tions on the following issues:
Needs Assessment Zone vs. Citywide Application Facilities
Fee
Developers' Alternative Proposal
On November 2, 1987, the Parks and Recreation Commission held a special meeting on this matter. After discussion and input from several members of the public, the Commission endorsed the sub-
committee's report.
The Parks and Recreation Commission voted (6-0) to advise the City Council as follows:
authorize a park development fee of 40 cents per square foot
on all development permits in Zone 5 pursuant to Section
21.90.050 of the Growth Management Program, and
direct staff to negotiate with the developers in zone 5 to
construct the recreational facilities up front. The final
agreement to be brought back to the Parks and Recreation
Commission for advisement to the City Council.
\
It is the intent of the Parks and Recreation Commission that the
developers' proposal to construct the facilities up front would
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 9/21-*/
serve as an alternative to assessing a fee. Therefore, at the successful conclusion of the negotiations, collected fees would be refunded to the appropriate parties. However, if an agreement cannot be reached by the City and Zone 5 developers, these fees shall remain permanent.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed fee would raise approximately $7,200,000 through
buildout of zone 5. The fiscal impact of the developers'
alternative proposal cannot be assessed at this time.
EXHIBITS : ..
1. Parks and Recreation Sub-Committee Report on Zone 5 Park Fees, October 1987.
2. Resolution No. 9307 , authorizing the collection of a local facilities management fee for park facilities in the
area defined as local facility management zone 5.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 9307
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE FOR PARK FACILITIES IN THE AREA DEFINED AS LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE 5.
~~
WHEREAS, Section 21.90.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code authorizes the establishment of a local facilities
management fee to pay for improvements or facilities
identified in a local facilities management plan which are
related to new development in a zone and are not otherwise
financed by any other fee, charge or tax on development, or
are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building
or development permit; and
WHEREAS, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5
identified a need for park facilities which relate to new
development in the zone and are not otherwise financed or
being provided: and
WHEREAS, the City Council on August 4,1987 adopted
Resolution No. 9188 which approved the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 5 and directed staff to work with the
Parks and Recreation Commission to specifically assess the
need for park facilities and to determine how to best provide
these facilities; and
////
////
I
2
1 c
4
c Y
6
7
e
9
IC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission appointed a
sub-committee charged to review the need for park facilities
in Zone 5 with the assistance of input from the developers
within Zone 5; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission sub-
committee through the use of two independent surveys and input
from the developers in Local Facility Management Zone 5
confirmed the demand and need for recreation facilities and,
further determined that these facilities were not being
provided; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission held a
special meeting on November 2, 1987 to review and consider the
sub-committees report and the Commission voted to recommend
that the City Council adopt a Local Facilities Management Fee
in the amount of 40 cents per square foot on all new
development within the Local Facility Management Zone 5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. Effective this date, a Local Facilities Management Fee
shall be collected upon all new development within the Local
Facility Management Zone 5 as shown on Exhibit “lgV which is
made a part hereof.
////
////
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
3. The amount of the fee to be collected shall be based on
a rate of 40 cents per square foot to be assessed on all
development pennits issued in Local Facility Management
Zone 5.
4. That all developers within the boundaries of the Local
Facility Management Zone 5 who have been issued development
pennits and have signed the AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES FOR
FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM shall be required to pay this fee within
thirty (30) days of receipt of the City's invoice in
accordance with said agreement.
5. The Local Facilities Management Fee shall be collected
as described in Section 21.90.050 (e) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
6. The Local Facilities Management Fee shall be reviewed
annually and adjusted accordingly to ensure that sufficis:
funds are being collected to provide for the recreational
facilities in Zone 5.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 24th day of November, 1987
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
ALETHA L.
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
EXHl BIT I' 1 I*
ZONE 5 7=F -
JANUARY 10
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-2-
city of Carlsbad
California
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT
ON
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 5 - PARK FEES
Sub-CommitWe Memberat
Commissioner Donovan
Commissioner Popovich
a 6 DWWIO-' RepmtatW: .'
Mr, Mark Hughes
October 1987'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IV. ZONE VERSUS CITYWIDE APPLICATION ......... 5
APPENDIX :
A. Growth Management Zona Map with Zona 5 Highlighted ..................... A-1
C. Analyaia/Rasearch.Limftad Survay ......... A-4
0. Saction 21.90.050 of the Growth
. Managmaant Ordinanca .......... ......... A-14
E. kttmr from David Bradstreat to tha Zono S Sub-Committea regarding tha davalopmant of a Golf Coursa ........... A-16
#
The sub-committee (hereinafter referred to as 'lCommitteeii) has studied each of the four issues which the City Council directed staff to return to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The committeels conclusions and recommendations are as follows:
NEEDS ASSESSMENT From current use information and the results of two, independent suweys, the Committee concluded that a recreational demand, which the City should address, does exist in Zone 5.
ZONE VERSUS CITYWIDE APPLICATION Based on the concentration of employees in Zone 5 and the ability to locate facilities in close proximity to this concentration, the Committee recommends that the proposed fee be applied at the
zone level.
FACILITIES
The Committea recommends that the following active recreational facilities ba devalopad:
7,500-10,000 square foot fitness center
1 swimming pool
3 ball Zields (lighted)
3 full-size basketball courts (lighted)
6 tennis courts (lighted)
4 outdoor racquetball/handball courts (lighted)
These facilities could be placed on one site, or several sites
throughout tha industrial corridor. It would require bethen 8 and If acres'to accommodate these facilities at a total cost of
between $5.8 and 8.9 million.
FEE
Based on the above program the Commfttaa recommends that a fee of
40 cents per square foot ba assessed on all building pennits in Zone 5 pursuant to Section 21.90.050 of the Growth Management
Ordinance. #
ALTERNATrvG
The Committea is aware of the drawbacks of assessing and collecting a developmant fee to pay- for the timely construction
of recreational facilities. The developers have proposed an alternative whereby thay would design and build the Zacilfties up front on City (Macario Canyon) and/or County owned land. The
Committea believaa that such an altarnativa has potential benefits, to both tha City and the developers, and recommends
that the City explora this option.
Gi2
Yb
Zone 5 contains no residmtial davalopmant. The Growth xanaqement Performanca Standard for Parks, which only addresses residential demand, d0.s not apply in this zona. Howaver, staff felt a recreational demand was baing ganaratad by tha non- residential amployear in Zona 5 which was not baing satisffed by the employars and is impacting City park facilities dasignad to meat rasidantial damand. Currently thara ara 8,000 employees in Zona 5; at buildout thera will be a minimum of 40,000. Staff felt tha situation would gat proqrasmivaly vorm without City interrantion. Tharafora, in th. Local Facilitias Managament Plan for Zona 5, a davalopmant faa to pay for active racraational facilftias to meat non-rasidantial damand was introducad.
At the Juna and July Parks and Racreation Commission maatings this faa was discussad. On August 4, 1987 a racommendation of 50 cantr par squara foot was prasantad to tha City Council. After considerabla public input and Council diS~~88iOn, Council supportad tha concapt of a park fa* but arkad that sevaral ismuas
be raviawad by tha Parks and Racraation Coamission, namaly:
Naada as8assmant Citywida versus zona application Facilitias to ba davalopad Amount Of fa8 to ba aS8aS8ad
At tha August Parks and Racraation Cammiasion maating a sub-
committee (harainaftat rafarrad to as Vomnittaaa) war formad to study * thasa issuam. CoPmrissionars Donovan and Popovich ware
appointad to tha Committaa. Mr. Mark Hughra, Dfractor of Markrtfng for Centra Davalopmant wab invftad to raprarant the devaloperr of Zona S. David Bradstraat, Raith Bavatly, Michael Holtmillar, Philip Cartar and Graca Manuas providad staf if support .
Tho followhq report datails tha conclusions of tha Committaa.
To quantify thr currant, non-rasfdrntial, racraational damand in Zona 5, tha City askrd SANDAG to conduct a survey. Tha ifour- quartion postcard on paga 3 was draftad by City staff and rrvfrwrd by SANDAG.
2
1. 0- your employor currently 0n.r any on-dtm rnnrtlond
f.ellllt.r/progrrmr?
1. Yes (sooc~ty)
2. No
Carisbad park frellltloumrartlon progmma?
2. 1 to 4 4. 9 to 12 8. 17 or mor.
1. 6all FMdr J. Picnic Arras 9. otner (SPOCI~~)
2 On 0 monthly bartr. how many day* do you penonally utlllro city of
1. Nono 3. s to 8 5. 13tO 16
3. WRat r.croatfonal frcllltlor would you Illto derdopd to meet your nodo?
2. Fitnoso Contor 6. Running Trrcks
3. Golf Courw 7. SwimmingPool 10. None
4. Gymnarlum 8. tonnis Counr
1. Yor 2. No
4. AI. YOU clr(8b.d mldW(?
Thana YOul
SANDAG compo6ad a list of randomly salactad amployars in Zona 5. Keith Bevarly received parmission from aach of tha employars to distribute the su~ays to thair employea8. A total of 3,425 surrays warm hand dalivared by SANDAG. 73s survays warm returned for a responsa rata of 21.52. It is SANDAG's axparianca that a responsa rata of 17% provider a statistically significant sample. Therefor., staff feels the abova rarults accurataly raflect the recreational naad of tha amployea ba8a in Zona 5.
Data from tha 1980 Census also affirm. tha reliability of the survey. Spaciffcally, tha 1980 Cen8us astimatad that 63% of the jobs In Carlsbad warm hald by non-residants which is similar to tha response of tha SANDAG Survay.
Sima results from tha SANDAG survay:
-0 501 of all rospondants use City park facilftiaa -- 629 of all rorpondants wera not raaldants of Carlsbad
-0 638 rampondad that their employars do not provida on-sit. racraational Facilitias #
Commissionar Donovan was concernad that tha wording of- the Introduction and rafaranca to the ttCltym of Carlsbad in the SANDAG Survay may haw biasad tha rasgonsa to quastion 3 regarding Facilftiea. Howwar, a. othar information (e.g.) the A/RL Survey, currant use statistics and an informal rurvay of her own) was availabla, sha felt comfortable supporting the recommendation of the Committaa.
3
*> 4 v-
csing tha survay results, it is projected that at buildout a minimum of 2S,OOO .non-residents will be employed in Zona 3, of which half will US. City park facilities.
In addition to the SANDAG sumey, the developcrrs commissioped a
survey through Analysis/Research Limited (A/RL). (A copy or the
survey is providad in the Appandix.) A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed, of which 204 wera returned for a
responsa rate of 51%. Tha rasults of tha two surrays vere similar. A/RL reported similar parcantagar to tha residency question and the quastion raqarding amployar providad facilities. In both sumrayr, approximately ona-fourth responded they play
golf.
A/RL dotarminad that tl...moat paopla who work in Zone 3 participata in racraational activitiar in thair spare tima, and that most of those paopla prafar to angaqo in thair ricraatioRal activitfas naar thair homo." HOWaVOr, tha Exacutiva Summary goes on to concluda:
"Facilitiar conduciva to amployaa bas. of Zona s
might includa a jogging track and/or "par coursa" (I... jogging track with axarcisa/workout stations along tna
path). Such a track should ba abla to ba langthanad or expandad as tha park area groor8.
combination tannis/baskatball courts would accommodata a significant parcrntaga of tha Zona S amployear.
Cycling paths through tha complax might also bo considorad, aa wall as outdoor wallad racquat courts (for tacquatball and handball).
Study findings warrant considaration of an indoor exarcis. cantrt to ba usad by Zona S crmployaas during regular businmra hours and aftrr work. Such a facility
might includa arras for axarcira machina., waight training, and aarobic danca or axarclsm.n
In addition to th.8. swry8, an analysir of all adult sports
teams which c0mpat.d in City laaquas during fiscal yaar 1986-87, indicat.4 that 16.7% warm sponsorad by Carlsbad industry. Of the total adult participation of 3,3SS, 693 warm not Carlsbad
residanta and S60 participants worm from induatrfal lponsorad trams.
Park Facility US. by industry, primarily for company picnics, from July 1, 1987 through Saptambar 13, 1987 nattad 1,466 participants and S6 hours of facility US.. Tha racant opening of
Stagacoach Park gymnasium har also attractad industrial employees during tha noon houg for rrcraation play. An alavon-day survey period from Auguat 21 through Saptambar 4, 1987 (rxcludiw
4
weekends) netted 46 participants logging 276 hours of use.
These statistics are evidence of the recreational demar,d generated by the influx of employees in zone 5.
IV. ZOm mu3 CITYWIDE APPLICATION
The need for recreational facilities in the industrial corridor is based on tha concentration of industrial land US. in this-one location. At buildout, it will generata a workday population of
at least 40,000 employees. This situation daar not apply t:, commercial and office land uses which are dispersed in much smaller areas throughout the city. It would ba difficult to establish the ralationship requiring commercial and office uses, especially in the most northarly and southerly parts of the City,
to fund a recreational park in tha industrial corridor which is located in tho centrr of the City.
Also, when tha Parks and Recreation Elamant of tha General Plan was updated in 1982, it recognizad tha concantration of industrial land uso and tha resultant concantration of employmes. It contains policy statamants SpOCifiCally ancouraqing industrial devalopmantr to provida rrcraational facilitiaa for thair day usm population. Tho Elamant doa8 not Contain any similar policy statemants ralating to commarcial or offfca. Tha moat dafansibla
justification for raquiring naw davalopmant Standard8 or exacting fees is whara it is supportad specifically by policy statements in tho Ganaral Plan. .
As it is tha intent of this report to raflact tho opinions of all participants, it shoukl ba noted that the davalopars arm not in total agreemant with tha dacision of tho Committao.
The developorr understand tha practical aspect of assassing the reo on a zona laval. Howavar, thay disagrao with the equity of such a fa.. Thay argua that amployaaa of commarcial development
throughout tho City alro impact thm City racraational program, but simply bocaum theao amployaar aro not a8 concantratad, the davalopmant8 aro not boing assas~od.
with regud to tho Ganaral Plan, thm dovalopars do not fed the word "ancouragam aquatas to asaassing a fa.. Tha Planning Director'# re8ponao war that the Canoral Plan consists bf broad
assessing a fa., or by nagotiating with davalopars for the construction of racraational facilitiaa, tho City can ba assured that tha recreational naadr of tho amployaar in tha industrial
corridor will bo mat.
policy statemants rathor than spocific action plans. BY
1
V. FACILITIES
Basad on tha rosults of tha SANDAC Suney, the A/RL Surrey ar,d current facility US. information, tho Committea recommends that the following activa recreational facilities bo devalopad:
7,500-10,000 squara foot fitnass cantor
1 swimming pool*
3 ball fields (lightad)
3 full-siza basketball courts (lighted)
6 tannis courts (lightad)
4 outdoor racquatball/handball courts (righted)
Thesa facilities could ba placad on on0 lit., or savaral sites locatad throughout tha industrial corridor. Staff astimates that it will raquira batwamn 8 and 15 acras to accommodata thescc facilitia~. Mark Hughas suggastad an acquisition coat of $8 per spar. foot, or approximataly $350,000 par acra. Stalf astimatos tha cost of davaloping tha facilitias at $11S,ooO par acra, plus
$2,000,000 for davalopmant of tha fitnam cantar and swimming pool. Thorafora, tha total cost of tha racommandad program would bo $5.8 - 8.9 million, dapanding on tha acraaga raquirad.
Acquisition Devalopmant Fftnars Cantar C Pool
$ 2.8 S 5.2
1.0 1.7
2.0 2.0
Total'in million8 -5.e $373
(Doas not include m8intanance and op8ration expansas.)
In addition to t&a abova activa rrcraational facilitias, tha Committra racommands that davalopars continua to provida passiva
recraational facilitima (a.q. picnic armam, par coutsaa, opan spaca) Such ar0.8 arm typicaily a condition- of approval. placing auch facilitiaa on-sit. thay will bast saw. employaaa. c
Mark Hugh..' initial undarstanding war that thm swimming *
would ba a 3-lanm lap pool adjacant to tha fitnasm cantat.
subraquant maating, tha Commissionars indicatd that thair intent wa8 a swin complax with a 2S to 50 metar pool. Hark HUgh.8 faalr
that such a complax is abova and bayond what is rmquirad to meat tha dimand ganaratad by tha amployaas in Zona S.
- BY the
pool
~t a
6
Staff estimates that the program datailed in Section V above, will cost batwean $5.8 and $8.9 million. The Local Facilities Management Plsr? for Zone 5 estimates that them is 18,000,ooo square feet remaining to ‘which this fee could be applied. Therefore, a tea of between 32 cants and 49 cents per spar. foot would be required.
Mark Hughes estimated that the abova facilities could be placed on 10.25 acres and be developed at a cost of $2 million (which includes the cost of a lap pool and not a swim complex). His estimates yielded a fea of 30.9 cents per squara foot. To allow for inflation, ha suggastad that a fa0 of 35 cants par square foot be imposad.
Tha Commissionarr consfdared all a8timat.S and compromised on a fea of 40 cants par squara foot. Tharafora, it is the recommandation of the Committaa that a faa of 40 cants par square foot bo assasrad on all building parmfts in Zona 5 pursuant to
Section 21.90.0SO of the Growth Managamant Ordinanca.
As an altarnatfva to assessing a fa., tha davalopars of Zona 5 have proposad the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Th8
Allow tha davolopmant community of Zona 5 to dasign and build tha do8ignat.d facilitias up front on City (Macarfo Canyon) and/or County omad land.
If tha facilitias bra located in Macarfo Canyon, have tho davaloparr build tha axtansion of Faraday through to tha futura Cannon Road to accasa Macario Canyon with tha City antaring an agraamant to raimburrra tha cost of
Faraday through daaignatad PPP funds.
Devaloparr and City cooparata in astablirhing a Mallo- Roos Distrfct to front tho cost of dovaloping tha recraational facllitlar and Faraday in the immadiata f utura
Include in tha Mollo-Roos District othar Zona 5 domignatad improvamant rmquiremantr (o.Q., circulation) to in8ura tha continued davalopmant of .tha com~rcial/indurtrial land in tha Zona. (Which is tha sourca of rapaymant of tha Hallo-Room.)
City staff and davaloparr to cooparata in davaloping a comprahansiva plan and tima table for approval by tha city council.
details of this altarnativa naad to ba negotiated. Commissioners Donovan and Popovich had many concorns and
7
1
questions, as did tha developers. One concam was tha expense of maintaining and operating these facilities. At this tiae, the city budgat has little room to operato additional tacFLities. There are basically three alternatives to fund the ongoing expensa of them facilities; (1) require the developers to pay for the MLO, (2) find tha money in tha City budget, or (3) include that expensa in tha MOllo-Roos District. Such financing issues nead to be rasolvad.
In ordat to raach a final agraamant, both tha city and the
devalopars of Zona J must banaflt. Tharafora, it is the racommandation of tho Committee that tha Parks and Racraation commission advisa tha City Council to direct staff to enter into negotiations with tho davaloperr on thair prop0s.d altarnativa. Tha final aqraamont will bo brought bafora tha Parks and Racraation Commission for reviow and subsequantly to tho city Council for approval.
If tha city Council approva8 tha final agreemant than collactad
fees will ba rafundad to tha appropriato partias. If an agraomant Is not raachad batwaan tha City and tha davalopmrs of zona 5 than tha faa shall ramaln parmanont. Tha Committeo recommands that tho fao bo raviawad on an annual basis to anaura
that sufficlant funds arm baing collactad to pay for tha faCilftf.8 datailad in Saction V.
It should ba notad that in tha coursa of thasa discusulons the issuo of having tho dovalopatr of Zona 5 conrtruct a golf coursa on tha County property naxt to thi Public Safaty Cantor has bean rafsad.
A public, 18-holar championship golf course would ba a tremndous assat to Carlsbad. It would whanca tha City's overall
recraational progras. It would satisfy a naad in tha colpmunlty.
Through privltization, tha facility would pay for its saintrnanca and operation axponra and not be a drain on City ravanuos. For
thosa rmaaons, the Commisaionars on tha Committaa consfdar the golf couxsa to ba M attractiva amonfty.
Mark Huqhm ha. ropaatadly rtatad that tha davolopars of, Zona 5 arm not vlllirrq to construct a golf couraa. A golf courh would
not satirfy tha racraatlonal damand. of tha amployaos in tha industrial corridor. Almo, they fael a golf course would provlda
cityvida benefit and a8 such should ba fundod by a citpida fea.
APPENDIX
ZONE 5 - L ,CAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
A- 1
-- SANDAG SURVEY --
The following surtey was conducted by SANDAG on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. A total of 3,425 surteys were distributed t3 randomly salected business in Zone 5. 735 surt9ys were reedrned for a response rate Of 21-50. It is SANDAC's experience that a response rata of 17t provides a statistically significant sample. Data from other sOUIC8s (Bog.# 1980 Census) also affirms the reliability of the survey.
CITY OF -BAD PARK USE'SURWY
The City of Carlsbad is conducting this sm.ay to determine and provido for the recreational needs of the industrial population in Carlsbad. Plmamr complete and return this po8tage-paid card by September 18, 1987.
Q1:
Q2:
mea your amployor currently offar any on-rito recreational facilitios/programs?
Number of porsonr responding (cases) - 721. Numbor of responses - 863, dum to multfpla answers.
t of It of Responses Rerp Casm
62.6 No 451 52.3
Roc/ Fft/Weights 249 28.9 34.5
Aerobics 57 6.6 7.9
sports 90 10.4 12.5
16 1.9 2.2 Other
863 100 . 0 119.. 7
.. -
On a monthly baaia, how many days do you puaonally utilize
City of Carl8bad park facilitiea/racroation program?
Casas Pmrcant
0 357 49.2
1 to 4 224 30.9 s to 8 82 11.3
13 to 16 17 2.2
17 or mora 16 2.2
9 to 12 29 4.0
- 725 - 100 . 0
A-2
43: What recreational facilities would you like developed to
meet your needs?
Number of persons responding (cases) - 714. Number of responses - 1631, due to multiple answers.
% of % of Responses Resp Cases
Ballfields Fitness Center
Golf Course
Picnic Area Track swimming Pool Tennis Other None
Gymnasium
152
231
164
124
263
121
197
166
102
91
9.4
14.3
10.2
7.7
16.3 7.5
12.2
10.3
6.3
5.6
21.3
32.4
23.0
17.4
36.8
16.9
27.6
23.2
14.3
12.7
1,611 100.0 225.6
Q4: Are you a Carlsbad resident?
Cases Percent
Yes No
280 313.1
455 61.9 - 735 - 100.0
c
f
EACKGFtlUND AND PURWSE OF SFdX3Y
he City of Carlsbad is propsim a fee tr, Zone 5 develocers for the
purpose of providing recreational and park facilities for primarj use by
employees in the area. The main plrpose of this study is to determine the
recreational needs of Zone 5 employees.
include :
Specific objectives of this study
1. Tb profile Zone 5 employees resarding their recreational *behavior
2. ?b determine which near mrk activities are of mst interest to employees
Tb determine the intprtance of and satisfaction with miscellaneous services and mities in the area 3.
4. 'Ib determine clarcnt levels of satisfaction mnnq Carlsbad resident
emplm aoncerninu recreational facilities and proarams in Zone 5
5. Tb provide a demographic profile of Zone 5 enployees.
A-5
9
The study reported herein was conducted durinq the week of sotember 7,
1987, wth Zone 5 gnployees in the City of Carlsbad.
administered questionnaires *re distributed to emplops randmy drawn frcm
various ccmnercial areas in Zone f.
were returned, representing a response rate of 51 percent.
and hardling of auestionnaires were cpnducttd by trained interriewers frm
Analysis/Research Limited.
mur bdrd =lf-
A total of 204 mnpletd auestionnalras
AU distrtbutron
Prior to data collection, extensive discussions were bld with the client
reqwdinq tk questionnaire 90 that all relevant topic areas and information
nded WO~ bs fully mered in the SU~Y.
maximize the efficiency of the survey ad validity of rtsrmses.
A pretest was tkn mnducted to
The margin of emr for the study is plus Or minus 6.5 percentacre vints
at a confidence level of 95 pcrmt.
A-6.
b
3
Analysis/Research Limitd
The Executive Findings am3 Reaxmendations will address the objectives of
the study as previously mention&, i.e. the assessment of the needs of
recreational facilities for people employed in the Zone 5 Area.
Recreational activities mst mentioned as the activities.of cbice of the
employees of Zone 5 were swimnirq (57%)
It is perceived that these mreational activities tend to be activities that
are most frequently performed (often ‘-doneroutside of any sinale recreat_io_nal
- fscil ity.
bikinq (47% 1 : W jogcritw/runnim ( 37%).
While nearly half of the mplc surv~)nect did not know which recreational
facilities and programs they wbold like to have near to their place of wrk,.
15% stated that they-wduld like swimnins facilities, 12% desired tennis murts,
and 10% said they wuld like to have a physical fitness center.;
It was determind thqh this study that kst people who mrk in the Zone 5
kea participate in recreational activitiea in thcir spare time, arid that most
of these people prefer to -48 in air recreational activities near their twie.
A total of 56.9a of th 204 respordentJ statcd that swimnim was a 1
recreational activit;y in which they participated.
they preferred to sui18 near their place of work.
they muld be very/muhat likely to swim near wrk if such SWimninCr facilities
ere available, while 12.78 said that thty wuld swim often/mths near wtk
A total of 12.7% said +it
A total of 12.7% stated that
if facilities were available for tbp to do 90.
A- 7
Analvsis, ?search Linitd
XA terns of jogging/runnhg: 36-89 Of the 204 respondents said that thv
~vn or jog; or ioq rns thcir place of wrk:
11 -3% explained tky would ke vr?ry/mt 1fidY to mn or iq near wrk if
facilities were available; 9.8V stated or jog mar wrk
ob/sanetinm if facilities were avaFlablc.
11.30 said tby preferred to
Of tha 204 pop10 sxrveydt 32.48 stated that thy play tennis Mer,
only-4.9% of thc 204 resporrdcnts stated tbat thy preferred to play tennis near-
os- at their pl- af wrk. My 4.91 of thc 204 respondents explained that they
would t9 very/mt likely to play tennis near thir place of wrk if
facilities were available.
often/sanetimes mar thhk placr of wrk if facaities were available.
pnd, only 4.4a said that thy wwld play tennis
VYlld bs dhly to use racreatfonal .- facilities located near their uock place.
. A-b
Analysis/Research Limit&
It was also determined that an ovemkhinq prcentaae of the emloyees of
zone 5 usually participate in their preferred recreational activities "after ._ - 9
4::On mkend~.~ Such a participation pattern wuld most likelv involve -. , .
activities perfonned away fran a "near wrk" recreational facility;
The survey reveal4 that onethird of the ccmpanies for which Zone 5 -
employees work vide OrganiZd nxreational activities,
of the Zone 5 employees WtDse cunpanies provide omanized recreational activities
do rat participate in these orgadzed activities.
sponsored recreational activity thy would like to participate, 439 of the
met, half (49%)
when asked in which ampany
5 errplopes said "me."*
Facilities conducive to eha employee base of Zone 5 mkht include a iocrairw
track &/or "par a~urses" (i.e., ths jcqgL# track with exercise/work oyt
rtions along the path). SLrch a track sbuld be able to be lemthened or
expndd as the park area qme.
Canbination tennis/basketball courts wuld mate a significant
prcentage of the Zone 5 employees.
Cycling paths through the acmplcx miqht alse, be considered, as -11 as
outdoor mlled racquet (bot raclauetball and handball).
Studv findif98 urrrcnt mideration of an indoor exercise center to be'
used by Zan~ 5 apbyeaa durirq rrgular business burs and after wrk.
facility might include areas for exercise machines, uciuht traininq, and
aerubic dance or exercise. -
Such a
..
A-9
1 e
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.-
12.
13.
No ( PUASE CO TW 0.10
(IF YES) What are they?
which mpany orqanized recreational activities do ypu particimte in?
In which ccmpany sponsored recreational activities would you like to
participate, if they were available?
~~ ~ ~
Did the company or area wbere you previously worked have any orqanized recreational activities?
Yes
No
Ncvlcr Warked
(IF m) What are
( ) KEASE (32"IMIE WITH Q.12
( ) PLEASE cx) TO Q.14
( ) PLFASE a 'TO Q.i4
they?
which cunpany orqanized recreational activities did you participate in?
A-1 1
14.
If.
16.
17.
bw adequate are the ament recreational facilities and proarms in the area around where 'flu rsrk?
Very Mmate 1-1
Sanewhat Pcleaua te 1-2
Scrmewhat Inadeauate ( 1-3
Very Inademate ( 1-4
what additional recreational facilities and DLIwrms, if my, Lduld
like to have near to where you wxk?
HOW important ace the followinsr sewices to yw in your area?
mY ml34WW NdvERy WI'ATALL mmwr m- RJfmRlwr ptpom
Fast food restaurants ( 1-1 ( 1-2 ( 1-3 ( 1-4
Family type restaurants 1-1 1-2 ( 1-3 ( 1-40
Upscale adult type restaurants ( )-I ( )-2 ( 1-3 ( 14
Child care facilities ( 1-1 ( 1-2 ( 1-3 ( 1-4
Reliuious institutions ( 1-1 ( 1-2 ( 1-3 . ( 1-4
Autanotive service stat ions ( 1-1 ( 1-2 ( 1-3 ( 1-4
bw satisfid are yw with the followitw semima in vow area?
VERY SCMEWAT NOPVERY WATU E13
SATISFIm SATISFIm SATISFIED SATISFIED c1pINICW
Family type restaurants ( 1-1 ( 1-4 ( 1-5
Upscale adult typa
Child care facilities ( 1-1
restaurants ( 1-1 ( 1-2 ( 1-3 ( 1-4 ( 1-5
( 1-2 ( 1-3 ( )-4 ( )-5
( 1-3 ( )-4 ( 1-5 -1iaious institutions ( 1-1 ( 1-2
Autanotive service stat ions ( )-4 (& J-3
- -.-. -- ~ --
And finally, we have a few questions for classsification pxpses.
In what city or orrmunity do you live?
How long have you live there?
18.
19.
lass than 1 year ( )-1
1 - 4 years ( 1-2
5 - 9 years t 1-3
10 - 14 years ( 1-4
15 years or mre ( 1-5
20,
21. &lou are sane we cateqories. Please check th OM that includes
What is the ZIP de where yw live?
your age
18 - 25 ( 1-2
26 - 35 ( 1-3
36 - 45 ( 1-4
Over 65 ( 1-7
22. What is your occupation?
23. Are you employed full time or part time?
9908 7 'rl T!!XNCF: :m.
The City CounciL of the City of Catlsbad, CaLiC~r-:~
does ordain as follows: I
I
SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by cP.e ac:',i:i=- ::
Chapter 21.90 to read as foLlovs:
"Chap tor 2 1 . 90 Gcouth flanaaerent
Sect ions :
I 21 . 90 . 0 10 Purnoso and intont . 21.90.020 Dot init ions .
21.90.030 Conoral prohibition, exceptions. 21.90.031 Tolling of tho Cor conridoration of applications submfttd bofore the ettect iv9
date of this chaptor. 21.90.032 Tollina of expiration of ureviousLy issued
dovelop~ont p.rmits.
21.90.033 Extonsions of orior ap@rovals orohibitec!. 21.90.040 Como1ianc.o with this chaotet tscuitad. 21.90.aSO ~ Fqt-nf facueq ranacem*n&
21.90 . 060
21.90.070
21e90 080 21e90.090 2le9Oe1O0 21.90.310 21e90e120 21,90e 12s
21e90e130
21 . 90 . 140
21.90 . 110 21.90.160
21 . 90.170 21.90.180 21.90 . 190
far. Spocial provisions for buildtnu aemits iisuod during towpotary moratoriw. Finding of hoalth, safoty and uoltars nocossary for tho foos huosod by sections
21.90.0SO and 21.90.060. Porfomance standard. Cityvide facilitior and b~rovemonts ?La?. Local tacilitios managomont zonas.
Contones of Local tacilfty mnaqement glans. Facilitfos management olan oreoattion. Facilitios manraemont plan orocesrinc tmplomontrtion ot Cacilitios and improvomontr roouiromonts .
Obligation to pay foor or ingtall hprovomonts rooui,rod by any other law. Irnplomonting guido'linos . Exclusions Council actions foos not fC8 Exbiration of chaptor. Sovorabil i ty .
I
I
I
A-1 4
I - i (a) X local facilities managerent fee is here5:y
established to Qdy for improvements or facilities *identrfitO in 4 Local facilities management plan which are related to new
development within tho zone and are not otherwise financed by an*! other fee, charge Or tax on development, or are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building permit or development
permit. .The fee may also b used to pay for that portion of t?.e €acilities or improvements identified in tho citywido facilities
and improvements plan attributed to develooment within. the local zone which aro not financed by other mans. The facilfties management fee shall be paid before the issuanco of a building
permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon t3.e estimated cost of tho facility or improvement designated as necessary to accommodato additional development within the applicable local facilities managomont zone plus the estimated cost ot facilities and Fmprovoments identifiod in the citywide facilities and hprovoment plan attributablo to the local zone.
The fee shall be fairly apportionod among the nev development.
(b) The fro required by this section is in addition to
any other means of financing facilities or Fmprovomonts
identified by a local facilities management plan or any other tax, fee, charge or improvement reuuiroment which may be imposed
on the doveloprnent of property under the provisions of state law
this code or City Council policy.
management tone shall bo sat by City Council resolution after a
public hearing, published notice of which shall bo given according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Governmint Cod. Section S4992.
permit applicatfon submitted aftrr the effectivo date of this chapter tho applicant shall agree to pay tho fee establishad by
this section at tho timo a building pmit is issued.
(c) Tho amount of the fee for a local facilities
(4) ~3 a condition ot any building 01: dovolopm~nt
(0) The fee established by this Section shall be hvieI
at the tima OF iS8uanco of a building prmft. c
A-1 5
I
September 18, 1987
TO : ZONE 5 SUB COMMITTEE
FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND .FECREATION DIRECTOR
ZONE 5
In an effort to provide the community with well balanced, comprehensive park facilities and recreation proqrms, staff has been involved in an extensive park and recreation development program. that there is a nted"to expand upon or create additional park and recreation facilities that are currently not provided for i.e., golf course complex.
After review and analysis of the industrial population influx created primarily from Zone 5 (40,000-70,000 at buildout), it has been determined that this population will have an impact upon current and future planned recreation facilities. This impact may be absorbed in the Citys existing and planned facilities on1
program. In addition to PFF fees, staff is recommending the irnplementation of a separate fee to facilitate additional recreational development.
Staff further recommends that the development fee be applied towards the construction of a golf course complex. not only provide a well balanced park and recreation program to the community, but would also eliminate rnaintenance/oparation and lease cost. By operating the complex under a privititation concept, user
fees would offset maintenance cost by 1OOt and possibly provide additional ravenu. to further expand recreation facilities.
suggested that resident and non-residant fees be established and that the industrial employaecs living outside the city be charged
a resident fee. county to leas. 1SOs aczes in the industrial zone 5 area.
preliminary evaluatLon of this property indicates suitability for the developrnmnt of a golf course complex. A recent feasibility
study ha8 daterminad that a golf course complex could be developed within Macario Canyon should negotiations with the county fail.
As part of this development program it has been established
if industry participates in the City's over all recreation + acilities development
A golf complex would
It is
Negotiations are currently undernay with the
A
The Golf Comglex Davalopment cost has been estimated at 58,000,000 in todays aconomy. With the remaining industrial development in Zone S through buildout, an assessed fea of .42C par square foot would facilitate construction, construction at a later date may substantially increase the develop- ment cost and thereby increase any assessed fee for facilities.
An alternative to this inflationary factor is that tha industrial '
developers opt for up front construction of a golf complex built to City Standards. If the development cost should be less than
the estimated $8,000,000 then the fees will be lowered accordingly.
An inflationary factor for
Zone 5 Sub Committee September 18, 1987
Page Two
Should tho county lease or development of a golf complex on the Macarlo property fail to materialize, the following alternatives would be recommended.
Alternative I - up front or incremental development of a centralized
15 acre recreation complex within Zone 5.
Alternative If - up front or incremental development of three (3) five acre recreation .complexes statigically located throughout
Zone 5.
The cost to deve,lop either of the above alternatives is estimated
between $7,822,500 and $8,000,000. The annual maintenance and operation cost associated with these alternatives is estimated at $g,OOO/Ac/Yt or $130,000 per year. All cost estimates are
determined in 1987 dollars and have not determined inflationary cost should incremental development occur. Should either of these
alternatives be instituted, staff recommends tho maintenance and operation costs be absorbed by the industrial developers.
DB:pa
c
A-17
JULY 30, 1987
TO: RAY PATCHETT, ACTING CITY MANAGER
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
ZONE 5 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN (LFMP-5)
The Planning Commission at their meeting of July 1, 1987,
recommended. approval of the Local Facilities Mangement Plan for
Zone 5. A number of the facilities analyzed had certain issues
identified at the Commission meeting, and these issues are
discussed below.
Library
The City's existing, adopted performance standard for Library
does not apply in non-residential areas, however, the Plannlng
Commission did recommend that this Zone Plan be submitted to the
Library Board to see if they have comments or sugqestions on
this section. The Library Board reviewed the matter at their
Last meeting and agreed that the performance standard should not
apply to Zone 5. However, they did wish to reserve the right in
the future to consider a fee for non-residential use if library
use by the non-residential zones increases.
Parks
Parks in Zone 5 would not be subject to an existing performance
standard because the existing standard is based on residential
development. However, the Planning Commission and staff are
recommending that a local facility management fee for parks be
considered for Zone 5 based on the square foot of non-residential
building area. This fee would be specifically for the
acquisition and improvement of park/recrea t ional facilities
within Zone 5. Staff and Commission feel that thls proposed fee
is justified for a number of reasons. The first is that there Is
a policy statement in the Parks and Recreation Element (action
plan 1.1:5) which indicates that industrial developments could
provide recreational' facilities for their day use population.
Other reasons identified for requiring this type of fee include a
statewide survey which lists a number of cities that are already
requiring park fees for industrial, office and commercial square
footage. Those fees range in value from S.02 to $3.00 per square
foot. This survey helps substantiate a current trend of
providing recreational facilities within industrial areas. The
trend is based on a number of positive factors involving the
kinds of uses in industrial-commercial type areas. These
include:
Page 2
1) the fact that exercise tends to increase employee
productivity ;
2) recreational facilities can also act as a selling point for developers of large Lndustrial
lots/ buildings; 3) industrial areas are usually a good location for
lighted ballfields as there are no homes which would
be impacted;
4) recreational facilities can reduce the number of '
traffic trips at peak hours as many employees wlll
remain later to utilize the facilities; 5) they would provide greater recreational safety than
current activities, such as jogging or biking on
industrial streets.
In addition, park and athletic facilities are permitted uses in
the City's PI General Plan designation and the P-M Zone which makes up much of Zone 5.
Staff was recommending a fee of $.50 per square foot of building
space in Zone 5. The fee was derived based upon the idea of
developing a sports complex to serve the area.
Specifically, a multi-use sports complex was considered which
would meet the recreational needs of the industrial population.
The following amenities and their estimated costs are listed
below:
Multi-Use Sports Complex Totals
1. Land - 15 ac at $350,00O/ac $5,225,000
2. Development - 15 ac at $115,00O/ac 1,725,000
3. Community Center - 15,000 sq ft at $10O/sq ft 1,500,000
500 000 4. TennislRacquetball Facility - 20 at $25,000 ea S8.9f5.000 Subtotal
5. Overhead Misc. .other 5% Total
Rounded to $9,500,000
The proposed fee recommended in the Zone 5 Plan was based upon a
projected development potential of approximately 19,000,000
square feet of industrial areas.' Therefore, a fee of 5.50 per
square feet was proposed to cover the estimated $9,500,000
acquisition and development cost itemized above.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 identlficd
several alternatives for addressing the need for recreational
facilities in this zone. In recommending the establishment of a
fee the Planning Commission felt the matter, if approved by the City Council, should then be referred to the Parks and Recreation Commission to review the proposed fee. Rased upon a
Page 3
more -detailed analysis of facility needs, the exact amount of
the fee could then be established. The Zone 5 Plan would be
amended accordingly once a final decision is made.
Circulation
Currently all intersections and road segments within Zone 5 or
impacted by Zone 5 traffic meet the adopted performance
standard. With existing plus committed traffic, however, seven
intersections ‘and two road segments are projected to Pall below
the adopted performance standard. At buildout, nine
intersections are projected to fall below the standards unless mitigation beyond that required under the current Circulation Element is installed. The Planning Commission wants to. make sure circulation will be closely monitored by staff so if levels of service fall below the standard in the future, the City can
act quickly to mitigate the problems or halt development.
Zone 5 does not impact the adopted performance standard because . fire is based upon residential development. However, staff and
the Planning Commission are recommending that the City Council
approve a new non-residential performance standard for Flre
facilities based on three thresholds: 1) a daily work force
that exceeds 12,000 people in one area or zone; 2) an area
that is beyond a five minute fire response time; and 3) that the
Fire Department is unable to provide’one thousand gallons per
minute of fire’flow in ten minutes or less. Zone 5 cannot
currently comply wi’th the second and thlrd proposed thresholds.
All three thresholds in this zone will be exceeded by early
1989. In accordance, the recommendation is that the schedule for Fire Station No. 5 be accelerated, with the constructlon to
begln,in early 1988, with an opening date of early 1989. If the
City Council concurs with the proposed new standard, the
previously approved Council Resolution adoptlng the Growth
Management Performance Standards will be amended to include the
new fire standard.
Sewer Collection System
The Commission felt that the sewer facilities in Zone 5 meet the
required performance standard. In approving sewer, they also
verified the staff recommendation that the performance standard
should be based on the sewer sub-basin rather than the entire zone. In other words, the failure of one sub-basin would not
affect an adequate sub-basin in the same zone. The sub-basin
meeting the performance standard could continue to develop.
Some of the new recommendations conccrning parks and fire did
not surface earlier because Zone 5 is really the first non-
Page 4
residential zone plan staff has looked at In detail. The need
for the new standards came about as d result of this close
analysis.
With the changes and comments mentioned above, the Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the
Local Facilities Managment Plana for Zone 5.
/
b13H: CG; din
A-4 DRAINAGE
APPENDIX A4
DRAINAGE COST ESTIMATES
5
ZONE 13
MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITY - CB
Headwai Is 1 EA $2,500 $2,500
CB Subtotal
15% Contingency
subtotal
20% Engineering and administrative cost I
$576,570
$86,486
$663,056
$132,611 I
~~
Storm Drain CB Total $795,667
APPENDIX A4
DRAINAGE COST ESTIMATES
Item
No.
1
2
3
4
5
ZONE 13
MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITY - CC
Item Estimated Unit Unit Price Total Cost
Description Quantity
42" RCP 3,450 LF $1 18 $407,100
5 1 " RCP 700 LF $135 $94,500
Cleanouts 15 EA $3,050 $45,750
Catch Basin 10 EA $7,040 $70,400
Headwal Is 1 EA $2,500 $2,500
Service
Area
CC Subtotal
cc
$620,250
I 15~~ Contingency I $93,038 I I subtotal I $713,288 I I 20% Engineering and administrative cost I $142,658 I
I ~ I I I Storm Drain CC Total I $855,945 I
APPENDIX A4
DRAINAGE COST ESTIMATES
Service
Area
BAA
ZONE 13
MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITY - BAA
Item
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
15% Contingency
subtotal
20Y0 Engineering and administrative cost
Storm Drain BAA Total
$94,939
$727,866
$1 45,573
$873,439
Unit Estimated
1,200
~
LF $135 I $1 62,000 5 1 I' RCP
LF $25 I $29,940 1,200 Repave 5 1 "
60" RCP LF $189 I $20,034 106
106 60" RCP
Jack & Bore
LF
$240 I $2 5,440 $ $1 36,500 Channel
Grading
14,000 CY
$49,9 1 3 Erosion
Control
Riprap
8,250 SF
2 EA Cleanouts
Reveg -
planting
Headwal Is
52,800 SF $1 98,000
EA
A-5 CIRCULATION
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS FOR THE
CARLSBAD LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PIAN - ZONE 13
Carlsbad, California
August, 1994
Prepared for:
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Prepared by:
KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC.
1453 Third Street, Suite 400
Santa Monica, California 90401
(31 0) 458-991 6
Ref: 762
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 . INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................... 1
STUDYSCOPE ............................................ 3
ORGANIZATION OF REPORT ................................. 6
II . EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................... 7
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS .................................... 7
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ............ 8
111 . FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ................................... 16
SANDAG MODEL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ....................... 16
BACKGROUND CUMULATIVE PROJECT fRAFFlC ................. 17
ZONE 13/CARLSBAD RANCH TRIP GENERATION ................. 17
ZONE 13 DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS ........................... 20
ZONE 13 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS ............................. 22
ZONE 13/CARLSBAD RANCH TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON ...... 23
FUTURE TRAFFIC LEVELS ................................... 31
IV . TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ..... : ................................. 35
FUTURESTREETNRWORK ................................. 35
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS ............................. 36
ROAD EXTENSION ..................................... 37
ROAD EXTENSION ..................................... 37
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................. 40
YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WITH CANNON
YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . WITHOUT CANNON
V . MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................... 41
. DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES ...................... 41 EFFECT OF MITIGATION MEASURES ........................... 43
VI . ARMADNLEGO INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ............................ 46
TRADITIONAL INTERSECTION DESIGN ......................... 46
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS .................................... 48
SUMMARY ............................................... 50
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
VI1 . KELLY PROJECT ANALYSIS ........................................ 52
TRIP GENERATION ......................................... 52
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ........................... 52
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................. 55
MITIGATION MEASURES .................................... 55
THRESHOLD ANALYSIS ..................................... 58
VIII . SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................... 60
APPENDIX A . INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS
APPENDIX B . CARLSBAD LEG0 FAMILY PARK TRIP GENERATION
r .
LIST OF FIGURES
- NO .
6
7
8 .
9
10
11
12
13
14
PROJECT STUDY AREA ...........................................
LFMP-ZONE13 ................................................
EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........................
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ........................ YEAR 2000 WITHOUT CANNON ROAD EXTENSION
LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION .............
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 ONLY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......... YEAR 2000 WITHOUT CANNON ROAD EXTENSION
LFMP ZONE 13 ONLY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS LFMP ZONE 13 ONLY
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............................
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 WITH BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............................
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 WITH BACKGROUND WITHOUT
CANNON ROAD EXTENSION PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......
BUILDOUT LFMP ZONE 13 WITH BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............................
ROUNDABOUT DESIGN ...........................................
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS WITH KELLY C’OMMERCIAL PARCEL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............................
...........................
2
4
9
24
25
26
27
28
29
32
33
34
49
54
LIST OF TABLES
1
2
8
9
10
10
12
13
14
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS . . . . . . .
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED
INTERSECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS, EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . .
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS, EXISTING CONDITIONS .
LFMP - ZONE 13 TRIP GENERATION, YEAR 2000 . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LFMP - ZONE 13 TRIP GENERATION, BUILDOUT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . .
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS WITHOUT MITIGATIONS . . . .
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS WITH MITIGATIONS . . . . . . .
ARMADA DR./LEGO DR. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROUNDABOUT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
KELLY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
BUILDOUT WITH KELLY PROJECT WITHOUT MITIGATIONS . . . . . . . . . .
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS,
BUILDOUT WITH KELLY COMMERCIAL PARCEL WITH MITIGATIONS . . I
11
12
13
15
21
22
38
39
44
47
51
53
56
59
Y
1. INTRODUCTION
This report documents the findings of a traffic study conducted by Kaku Associates, Inc. to
evaluate the potential traffic impacts of projects included within the City of Carlsbad Local
Facilities Management (LF.M.) Zone 13. Zone 13 includes the land parcels of the Carlsbad
Ranch plus some additional parcels not affiliated with the ranch. The intent of the traffic analyses
was to identify the scope and timing of any transportation infrastructure improvements that would
be required to accommodate the traffic generated by Zone 13 development. The traffic analyses
were conducted for the Year 2000 and "Buildout" conditions. If intersections or street sections
were projected to not meet City of Carlsbad performance standards in 2000 or Buildout
conditions, interim year development levels were tested in order to identify the year and the
amount of mitigation needed to bring the roadway or intersection up to City standards.
This report represents an update of two previous reports. In June, 1991 the firm of Urban
Systems Associates, INC. (USA) prepared a transportation analysis for Zone 1 3 that identified the
needed transportation facilities for the Zone 13 land uses proposed at the time. Kaku Associates,
Inc. (KA) prepared a transportation impact analysis that tested the effects of adding the LE57
Family Park (a family-oriented theme park) and other land uses proposed in the Carlsbad Rancn
Specific Plan Amendment the land uses in Zone 13. This report was prepared in April, 1994.
Background details on the history of development for Zone 13 and the traffic analysis for the
LEG0 Family Park may be found in these reports.
PROJECT DESCRlPTlON
The Local Facilities Management Zone 13 is located just east of the Interstate 5 (1-5) freeway in
the City of Carlsbad, California. The zone is situated on approximately 709 acres of land located
generally between Palomar Airport Road and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and east of the 1-5
freeway. Figure 1 illustrates the LF.M. Zone 13 in relation to the surrounding street system.
1
LfMP Zone 13
Zone 13 Boundoty
Future Roodway
KAKUASSOCIATES 2 flGURE 1
PROJECT STUDY FFrd
me LF.M. Zone 13 would consist of a variety of land uses including Office, retail, research and
development, hotel, institutional, resort and theme park (Le., LEGO Family Park) uses. Along with
the Carlsbad LEGO Family Park, L.F.M. Zone 13 would consist of the following components:
Pointe Resort - This would consist of a 700 room hotel, commercial uses, conference
rooms, meeting/ballrooms, restaurants, and a golf course.
Research and DeveloDment Office/Corporate Headauarters - This component would
consist of approximately 500,000 square feet of research and development and
approximately 300,000 square feet of corporate headquarters office uses.
Communitv Hotel and Retail - The community hotel would consist of approximately 280
rooms and about 20,000 square feet of retail uses.
Gemoloaical Institute of America (GIA) - The GIA component of the Carlsbad Ranch
development would consist of approximately 550,000 square feet of educational, research,
administrative and light assembly uses.
SDecialtv Retail - This component of the project is projected to ultimately consist of
approximately 325,000 square feet of regionally oriented specialty retail.
SDG&E - This component would consist of approximately 463,600 square feet of travel
services directed toward tourist/freeway activities.
Figure 2 illustrates the location of the different components of the Zone 13. Although not shown
on Figure 2, the SDG&E component is planned to be located in the northeast corner of the 1-5
and Cannon Road.
STUDY SCOPE
The scope of work for this study was developed in conjunction with the City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department. The base assumptions, technical methodologies and geographic
coverage of the study were all identified as part of the study approach.
The study is directed at the analysis of potential traffic impacts along the existing and future
street systems. As directed by the City of Carlsbad, the following traffic scenarios are analyzed
in the study:
3
LEGEND:
lffI Regional Retail Travel/Recreational Commercial/CommercfaI
Open Space Area
Io/p(J Offics/Plannrd Industrial
Travei/Recreational Commercial
Sourer: Hot mon Plonnlng hodalas
\ KAKU AS SOCIATES -
FIGURE 2
LFMP - ZONE 13
4
Existina Conditions -The existing conditions analysis includes an assessment of land use, streets and highways, traffic volumes, and operating conditions.
Year 2000 Conditions with Zone 13 (Cannon Road extended to Pointe Resort Drive) - The
objective of this phase of the analysis is to project future traffic conditions which could
be expected to result from regional growth and traffic expected to be generated by the
L.F.M. Zone 13 under Year 2000 conditions with Cannon Road only extending to Pointe
Resort Drive. This was conducted for the typical commuter weekday peak hours and the
weekend peak hour.
Year 2000 Conditions with Zone 13 (Cannon Road extended to El Camino Reall - This
analysis would be the same as the Year 2000 analysis described above with the
exception that Cannon Road would be extended to El Camino Real.
Buildout Conditions with Zone 13 -The objective of this phase of the analysis is to project
future traffic conditions which could be expected to result from regional growth and traffic
expected to be generated by the L.F.M. Zone 13 under buildout conditions. Under these
conditions, Cannon Road would extend to the City of Oceanside. This was conducted
for the typical weekday commuter peak hours and the weekend peak hour.
The following locations, which are illustrated in Figure 1 , were identified for analysis in each of
the scenarios identified above:
Intersections
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1 1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Avenida Encinas & Cannon Road
Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road
1-5 Southbound Ramps & Cannon Road
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road
1-5 Southbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road
Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airport Road
Car Country Drive & Cannon Road
Leg0 Drive & Cannon Road (future intersection)
Armada Drive/Price Club Driveway & Palomar Airport Road
Hidden Valley Road & Palomar Airport Road (future intersection)
College Boulevard 8 Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real & Cannon Road (future intersection)
Camino Vida Roble & Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Road
Street Seaments
A.
8.
C.
0.
E.
Cannon Road between 1-5 and Paseo del Norte
Cannon Road between Paseo del Norte and Leg0 Drive (future location)
Cannon Road west of El Camino Real (future location)
Palomar Airport Road between 1-5 and Paseo del Norte
Palomar Airport Road between Paseo del Norte and Armada Drive
5
F. G. Palomar Airport Road between College Boulevard and Camino Vida Roble
Palomar Airport Road between Camino Vida Roble and El Camino Real
ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
This report is divided into eight chapters. Chapter II describes the existing circulation system,
traffic volumes and traffic conditions within the study area. The methodologies used to forecast
future traffic volumes and the Zone 13 project traffic volumes are described in Chapter 111.
Chapter IV presents an assessment of potential traffic impacts for the Year 2OOO and Buildout
scenarios. Chapter V discusses potential project traffic mitigation measures. Chapter VI
discusses alternate treatments of the intersection of LEG0 Drive and Armada Drive. Chapter VI1
discusses the overall cumulative impact of changing the zoning on the Kelly Property (located
on the south side of Palomar Airport Road across from the Zone 13 boundary) from industrial to
commercial. Finally, a summary of the analysis along with conclusions are included in Chapter
VII1.
6
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
A comprehensive data collection effort was undertaken to develop a detailed description of the
existing conditions in and near Zone 13. The assessment of conditions relevant to this study
includes an inventory of the streets and highways that serve the site, traffic volumes on these
facilities, and the operating conditions on the key roadways and at key intersections.
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
Primary regional access to the study area is provided by Interstate Highway 5 (1-5) which runs
in a north-south direction, west of the LF.M. Zone 13. The main access to and from the zone
would be via Cannon Road and Palomar Airport Road. The following provides brief descriptions
of the principal streets serving the study area:
Cannon Road - Within the study area, Cannon Road currently provides four travel lanes
west of the 1-5 to its eastern terminus at Car Country Drive. For the Year 2000 scenarios,
Cannon Road was assumed to be extended to Pointe Resort Drive in one scenario and
to El Camino Real in the other. For the Buildout scenario, Cannon Road was assumed
to be extended east of El Camino Real, providing access to the City of Oceanside.
Palomar Airport Road - West of Avenida Encinas, Palomar Airport Road provides two
travel lanes. East of Avenida Encinas to Yaro Drive, six travel lanes are provided along
Palomar Airport Road. Within the study area, traffic signals are present at the Northbound
and Southbound Ramps with the 1-5, Paseo del Norte, Armada Drive/Price Club Driveway,
College Boulevard, and easterly at key intersections including the study intersections of
Palomar Airport Road with Camino Vida Roble and with El Camino Real.
Avenida Encinas - Avenida Encinas is a north-south street located west of 1-5 and the
project site. Within the study area, Avenida Encinas provides four travel lanes from its
northern terminus at Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road.
Paseo del Norte - Within the study area, Paseo del Norte is a north-south street which
provides four travel lanes. Paseo del Norte provides access to Car Country south of
Cannon Road and serves commercial uses and a residential neighborhood south of
Palomat Airport Road. Within the study area, there is one signalized intersection along
Paseo del Norte. This occurs at Palomar Airport Road.
7
Colleae Boulevard - Within the study area, College Boulevard provides four north-south
travel lanes. The intersection with Palomar Airport Road is signalized.
Diagrams of the existing lane configurations at the analyzed intersections are contained in
Appendix A.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
The following sections present the existing peak hour traffic volumes at each intersection and
roadway segment, a description of the methodology utilized to analyze the volume/capacity ratio
or reserve capacity and the resulting level of service conditions at each of the locations for
existing conditions.
Existina Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Morning and afternoon peak hour traffic counts were obtained from the City at the 13 existing
analyzed intersections and the analyzed roadway segments. It should be noted that the data
supplied by the City was from the years 1992, 1993 and 1994. Per discussions with City staff,
a growth in traffic of approximately 2 percent per year has been experienced. Therefore, traffic
data used from 1992 was adjusted upwards by 4 percent and data from 1993 by 2 percent. The
resulting volumes represent the year 1994 existing peak hour traffic volumes. The intersection
peak hour traffic volumes are presented on Figure 3.
Level of Service Methodolocay
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow,
ranging from excellent conditions at LO$ A to overloaded conditions at LOS F. LOS D is the
typically recognized minimum acceptable level of service in urban areas. Under the Of
Carlsbad's Growth Management Standards, the minimum acceptable level of service. during the
peak hours is LOS D and for non-peak periods the minimum acceptable level of service is Los
EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRbFFlC VOLUMES
C. Level of service definitions are included in Tables 1 and 2 for signalized and two-way stop
controlled locations, respectively.
The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of intersection capacity analysis was used to
determine the intersection volume to capacity (V/C) ratio and corresponding level of service for
the turning movements and intersection characteristics at the eight existing signalized
intersections in the study area. Table 1 describes the ranges of V/C ratios and corresponding
levels of service for signalized intersections.
The "Two-way Stop Controlled" (Transportation Research Board, 1991) method was used to
conduct intersection capacity analyses for the remaining four stopcontrolled intersections. This
methodology calculates the amount of reserve capacrty available for each of the constrained
movements allowed at an intersection, Le., those movements which are goJ free flow and must
wait for the right-of-way before they can be completed. The methodology provides for the
translation of this reserve capacity into a level of service for each movement. Reserve capacity
represents the unused capacity of the lane in passenger cars per hour. Table 2 provides a
description of the relationship between this reserve capacity and the projected level of service.
The levels of service for the study roadway segments were determined based on a volume to
capacity ratio (similar to the signalized intersections) using a per lane capacity of 1,800 vehicles
per hour. The levels of service were determined using the same definitions as presented in Table
1.
Existina Peak Hour Levels of Service
Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday morning and evening peak hour V/C ratio, or available
reserve capacity, and corresponding level of service at each of the existing analyzed
intersections. As can be seen, under existing conditions, all of the eight signalized intersections
are currently operating at acceptable levels of service (i.e., LOS D or better) during the morning
and afternoon peak hours. Two of the four stop controlled intersections would operate at
acceptable levels of service while the remaining two would have a constrained movement
operating at LOS E during one or both peak hours. At the intersection of the 1-5 Southbound
10
TABLE 1
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFlNlTlONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
1
Level of Sewice
A
B
C
D
E
F
Volume/Capacity
Ratio
0.00 - 0.60
0.61 - 0.70
0.81 - 0.90
0.91 - 1.00
.> 1 -00
Definition
EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one
red light and no approach phase is fully used.
VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is
fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel some-
what restricted within groups of vehicle's.
GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait
through more than one red light; backups may
develo~ behind turning vehicles.
FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions
of the rush hours, but enough lower volume peri-
ods occur to permit clearing of developing lines,
preventing excessive backups.
POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection
approaches can accommodate; may be long
lines of waiting vehicles through several signal
cycles.
FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on
cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of
vehicles out of the in?ersection approaches.
Tremendous delays with continuously increasing
Queue lenaths.
Source: Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim
Materials on Highway Capacity, 1980.
11
TABLE 2
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFlNmONS FOR
TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS
A
6
C
D
E
F
F
> 400
300 - 399
200 - 299
100 - 199
0 - 99
Little or no delay
Short traffic delays
Average traffic delays
Long traffic delays
Very long traffic delays
-
co Failure - extreme congestion
(Any value) Intersection blocked by external causes
~
Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacify Manual, Special Report 209, 1985.
12
TABLE 3
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SGNAUZED
INTERSECTION
2. Avenida Encinas 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
5. 1-5 southbound ramps & Palomar Airport Rd.
6. 1-5 northbound ramps 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
8. Paseo del Norte 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
9. Car Country Dr. 8 Cannon Rd.
10. Leg0 Or. 8 Cannon Rd.
11. Armada Dr./Price Club Dnrvy. 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
12. Hidden Valley Rd. 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
13. College BI. 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
14. El Camino Real 8 Cannon Rd.
15. Camino Vida Roble 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
16. El Camino Real 8 Palomar Airport Rd.
SToP-cOmoLLED MOVE-
NB LT
NB RT
w8 LT
SB LT
SB RT
WB LT
NB LT
NB RT
EB LT
NB LT
NB RT
WB LT
1. Avenida Encinas 8 Cannon Rd.
3. 1-5 southbound ramps &Cannon Rd.
4. 1-5 northbound ramps & Cannon Rd.
7. Paseo del None 8 Cannon Rd.
AM PEAK HR
VIC LOS
0.45 A
0.35 A
0.37 A
0.59 A
NA [a] NA
NA [b] NA
0.36 A
NA [b] NA
0.37 A
NA [b] NA
0.39 A
0.61 B
AM PEAK HR
RESERVE
CAPAcrrY LOS
+229 C
+954 A
+516 A
+51 E
427 A
+796 A
+64 E
+662 A
+823 A
+424 A
+794 A
407 A
Notes:
[aJ Ninety degree two lagged intersection: LOS not applicable
[b] Future intersection
13
PM PEAK HR
VJC LOS
0.59 A
0.32 A
0.70 B
0.55 A
NA [a] NA
NA [b] NA
0.58 'A
NA [b] NA
0.60 A
NA [b] NA
0.62 B
0.72 C
PM PEAK HR
RESERVE
CAPACrrY LOS
+394 B
+ 766 A
+904 A
+187 D
+916 A
+717 A
+69 E
+889 A
+348 B
+134 0
+972 A
+857 A
TABLE 4
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SEGMENT
A. CannonRd. ' between 1-5 and Paseo del Norte
B. CannonRd.
between Paseo del Norte and Leg0 Dr.
C. CannonRd.
west of El Camino Real
4: Palomar Airport Rd.
. between 1-5 and Paseo del Norte
5. Palomar Airport Rd.
between Paseo del Norte and Price Club Drwy.
F/ Palomar Airport Rd.
between College 81. & Carnino Vida Roble
G. Palomar Airport Rd.
between Camino Vida Roble 8 El Camino Real
DIRECTION
w0
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
. E6
w0
EB
WB
EB
WB
E6
CAPACITY I ' J
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
3,600
3,600
AM PEAK HR
VOL. VIC LOS
912 0.25 A
309 0.09 A
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
1,058 0.20 A
848 0.16 A
1,668 0.31 A
732 0.14 A
599 0.11 A
1,220 0.23 A
1,084 0.30 A
808 0.22 A
PM PEAK HR
VOL. v/c LOS
379 0.11 A
624 0.17 A
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
1,058 0.20 A
1,846 0.34 A
974 0.18 A
1,700 0.31 A
1,640 0.30 A
860 0.16 A
790 0.22 A
995 0.28 A
- Note: ['I Capacity based on 1,800 vehicles per lane per hour.
111. FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
In order to properly evaluate the needed transportation improvements to support the full buildout
of Zone 13, it was necessary to develop estimates of future traffic conditions in the area with the
proposed project traffic and future cumulative background traffic taken into account. Future
traffic volumes (without Zone 13 development) were developed based on data from the San
Diego Association of Governments' (SANDAG) traffic model for the City of Carlsbad. Next, it was
necessary to develop trip generation estimates for the Zone 13 land use components. including
Carlsbad LEGO Family Park. These project traffic estimates were then added to the SANDAG
projections resulting in future traffic forecasts for conditions with the Zone 13 implemented. The
methodologies and key assumptions used in this analysis are described below.
SANDAG MODEL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
The Year 2000 and Buildout traffic projections which were developed from the SANDAG traffic
model for the City of Carlsbad included the development of the Carlsbad Ranch without the
Carlsbad LEGO Family Park. The raw data which was obtained from the model was adjusted
and refined utilizing existing count information. These traffic projections were used as a basis
for developing the future traffic forecasts for the Zone 13 analyses.
Included in the SANDAG model were roadway improvements which could be expected to occur
for Year 2000 and Buildout conditions. These improvements include the extension of Cannon
Road from Car County Drive to El Camino Real in the Year 2000 scenario (although this report
also tests Year 2000 conditions without this extension). For the Buildout scenario, Cannon Road
is expected to extend further east of El Camino Real, providing a link to the eastern portion of
the City and to the adjoining communities to the east. The extension of Cannon Road was
assumed in the future scenarios to represent a worst case scenario (Le., more through traffic
would pass through the study area) and is not a responsibility of the development of the
Carlsbad Ranch.
16
Trip Generation bv Land Use Component
The weekday trip generation estimates for the land uses other than the LEGO Family Park which
make up the remaining components of Zone 13 were based on the projected development
scheme and information provided by the City of Carlsbad and SANDAG. The trip generation
estimates for the retail, office, hotel, and resort land uses were based on a combination of
sources including published SANDAG trip generation rates and the ITE Trip Generation Manual,
5th Edition. Trip rates for the specialized Gemological Institute of America were taken from the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan after review with city staff. Trip generation estimates for the LEGO
Family Park were developed based on estimates of annual and daily attendance at the Park.
As mentioned earlier, the trip generation estimates for the Carlsbad Ranch (without the Carlsbad
LEGO Family Park) were included in the SANDAG model projections. Based on refined
information (i.e., specific land use types, sizes of development, and increased trip generation
rates) for the Ranch and the Zone as a whole, these trip generation estimates were actually
increased for use in this: analysis.
-
Carlsbad LEGO Familv Park Trip Generation
The development of traffic vqlumes for the proposed Carlsbad LEGO Family Park was based on
a variety of sources. Information provided by LEGO along with data from other visitor attractions
studies served as the basis for developing the proposed project trip generation. The
methodology and assumptions which went into the development of the trip generation are
described in detail in the April, 1994 Kaku Associates report Traffic Studv for the Carlsbad LEGO
Familv Park.
Trip Generation Methodology
In order to develop trip generation estimates for the Carlsbad LEGO Family Park it was necessary
to construct an analytical framework which utilized existing data from visitor attractions within
Southern California. Published data from other Southern California theme parks and visitor
18
attractions include the Sari Diego Zoo, Disneyland, Knott's Berry Farm, the proposed Port Disney,
Sea World, and Wild Animal Park. While none of these parks/attractions are exact duplicates of
the proposed Carlsbad LEGO Family Park, they provide an indication of mode splits, vehicle
occupancies, and hourly arrival and departure patterns at Southern California parks. Combining
this data with the knowledge of the general operating characteristics of theme parks/visitor
attractions and detailed information from LEGO on the Park itself (including attendance levels,
number of employees, average length of stay, etc.), the Carlsbad LEGO Family Park trip
generation estimates were determined to reflect Southern California conditions. The general
approach to estimating vehicle trips involves a series of steps which convert "person" trips into
vehicle trips.
Carlsbad LEGO Familv Park Trim
To be conservative, the trip generation estimates for the Carlsbad LEGO Family Park were
developed for the busiest weekday (Friday) and weekend day (Sunday) during the busiest month
of the year (August), thus representing a worst case scenario. It would be expected that for other
days and months of the year, attendance levels would not be as high as those being modeled
for this analysis, thus the proposed trip generation estimate would represent a conservative
approach. For purposes of this study, the typical weekday morning and evening peak hours (8-9
AM and 5-6 PM) of street traffic were assessed.
During the traffic analysis for the LEGO Family Park, a peak weekend analysis was conducted
in addition to the summertime weekday AM and PM peak hour analysis. However, this weekend
analysis showed that the most heavily impacted time period was indeed the weekday commuter
peak periods of the day. Therefore the infrastructure requirements for Zone 13 will be determined
by weekday peak hour conditions and not weekend conditions.
The Carlsbad LEGO Family Park is expected to generate a total of approximately 6,630 daily trips
(Le. 3,315 daily inbound and 3,315 outbound trips) for the Year 1999 for August Friday
conditions. The Carlsbad LEGO Family Park peak morning hour would occur during the 11 AM
to 12 Noon hour when a total of approximately 580 trips are expected (545 inbound and 35
outbound). The Park's evening peak hour would occur during the 5 PM to 6 PM hour, which
19
would coincide with the evening peak hour of street traffic, when a total of 710 trips are
anticipated (1 20 inbound and 590 outbound). During the morning peak hour of street traffic (8-9
AM), the Park would be expected to generate a total of approximately 125 trips.
The Carlsbad LEGO Family Park is expected to generate a total of approximately 8,180 daily trips
(i.e., 4,090 inbound trips and 4,090 outbound trips) for Buildout conditions on an August Friday.
The Carlsbad LEGO Family Park peak morning hour would occur during the 11 AM to 12 Noon
hour when a total of approximately 71 5 trips are expected (675 inbound and 40 outbound). The
park’s evening peak hour would occur during the 5 PM to 6 PM hour, which would coincide with
the evening peak hour of street traffic, when a total of 875 trips are anticipated (1 50 inbound and
725 outbound). During the morning peak hour of street traffic (8-9 AM), the Park would be
expected to generate a total of approximately 150 trips.
Included in Appendix 6 are the trip generation estimates for the Carlsbad LEGO Family Park for
the conditions described above.
Future Zone 13 Total Trir, Generation
Table 5 shows the estimated weekday trip generation for Zone 13 including the Carlsbad LEGO
Family Park for the Year 2000. As can be seen, the development is expected to generate a total
of approximately 41,980 daily trips, of which about 2,100 trips are expected during the morning
peak hour and about 4,085 trips during the evening peak hour. Table 6 summarizes the
weekday trip generation for Zone 13 for Buildout conditions, As shown on the table, Zone 13
(with LEGO) which includes the travel services commercial property owned by SDG&E would be
expected to generate approximately 69,380 daily trips of which about 3,650 trips would be
anticipated for the morning peak hour and about 6,900 during the evening peak hour.
ZONE 13 DISTRIBUTION PATERNS
The geographic distribution of traffic generated by the individual land use components of Zone
13 is dependent on factors such as: the geographic distribution of the population from which
ABLE 6
BUILDOUT
LFMP - ZUIJE 13 TRIP GENERATION
DEVELOPMENT
3lA
Speclalily Retail
Mke
3&D
iolel
3DG&E
'olnte Resort
Lego Famlly Park
Total
LAND USE
550,000 SF Offlcel
Campus
325,000 SF
3OO.OOO SF
500,OOO SF
280 Rooms
20.000 SFRelaIl
463.600 SF TNI Srvc
I 1100 Rooms
6,OOO SF Commerclal12
&16,000 SF Commerclal(2
24,000 SF Meetlng (2)
d6,OOO SF Restaurant
, 6.000 SFClubhouse
1 Golt Course Incl.
131
GENERATION RATE
2 per staft plus sldnts 11
50 per 1000 SF
20 per lo00 SF
B per 1000 SF
10 per room
40 per 1000 SF
40 per 1000 SF
3 per room
100 per lo00 SF
600 per course
DAILY
TRIPS
4,700
16,250
6,000
4,000
2,800
800
3,600
18.544.
5,600
1,900:
- 600
8,100
8,182
69,376
~~~ ~
AM PEAK HOUR
IN OUT TOTAL
550
227
756
576
101
14
115
334
168
11
- 29
208
152
2,919
61
98
04
64
67
10
77
223
112
8
7
1 27
0
733
Notes:
[I] Per 'Carlsbad Ranch Speclflc Plan' (Urban Systems Assoclales, Inc. June 1992)
12) Supportlng uses of hotel.
[3) Trlp generatlon per .Traffk Study for the Carlsbad LEG0 Family Park' (Kaku Associates, Inc. April 1994).
61 1
325
840
640
168
24
192
556
280
19
36
335
152
-
3,651
PM PEAK HOUR
OUT TOTAL IN
132
731
156
56
134
36
170
834
157
106
16
279
150
d
2,509
526
73 1
624
504
90
36
126
834
235
46
- 38
319
726
4,390
658
1,463
780
560
224
72
296
1,669
392
152
54
598
876
-
6,899
the potential visitors and employees are drawn, the location of the project site in relation to the
surrounding street system, and physical characteristics of the street system.
Based on these factors and information from other studies, three distribution patterns were
developed for Zone 13 traffic. The trip distribution patterns for the Year 2000 with Cannon Road,
Year 2000 without Cannon Road, and Buildout conditions are illustrated on Figures 4, 5, and 6,
respectively.
The major difference in the Year 2000 distribution patterns involves the heavier usage of Palomar
Airport east of Armada Drive for the scenario in which Cannon Road is not extended to El
Camino Real. Both Year 2000 distribution patterns show approximately two-thirds c?f project
traffic using Interstate 5.
Distribution patterns in the Buildout condition indicate a similar two-thirds usage of the freeway
with a higher dependance on the Cannon Road corridor from the east.
ZONE 13 TRAFFIC ASSlGNMENTS
Utilizing the estimated trip generation, and the distribution patterns developed above, the traffic
generated by the proposed Zone 13 land uses was assigned to the future street networks.
Figures 7-9 show the Zone 13 generated peak hour traffic volumes at each of the analyzed
intersections for both Year 2000 scenarios and for Buildout conditions.
ZONE 1 WCARLSBAD RANCH TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
A comparison was conducted between the trip generation estimates summarized in Tables 5 and
6 with the trip estimates for Zone 13 included in the Transportation Analvsis for Carlsbad
Facilities Manaqement Zone 13 (Urban Systems Associates, Inc., June 1991) and the
Transportation Analvsis for Carlsbad Ranch SDecific Plan (Urban Systems Associates, InC., June
1 992).
23
N P
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
YEAR 2000 WITHOUT CANNON ROAD fXTENSlON LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP OlSlRlBUTlON
BUILDOUT CONUI i IONS LFMP ZONE 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 ONLY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
YEAR 2000 WITHOUT CANNON ROAD ic ?J';ION LfMP ZONE 13 ONLY PEAK HOUR TPAfflC VOLUMES
For the Year 2000, the Facilities Manaaement Zone (FMZI 13 report states that the expected trip
generation for the zone (which is basically the Carlsbad Ranch site) is approximately 43,980 daily
trips, 2,585 morning peak hour trips, and 4,535 evening peak hour trips. The trip generation
estimates from the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, for the Year 2000, are approximately 56,630
daily trips, 4,290 morning peak hour trips, and 6,165 evening peak hour trips. Comparing these
estimates to those shown in Table 5, it can be seen that the daily estimates from this study are
approximately five percent lower than those included in the FMZ 13 study and approximately 26
percent lower than the estimates in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. The morning and evening
peak hour differences are somewhat higher. The proposed trip generation under Year 2000
conditions for all three studies are summarized below:
Oailv Trips AM PK HR PM PK HR
Zone 13 (1 994 Plan) (see Table 5) 41,980 2,100 4,085
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan 56,630 4,290 6,165
FMZ 13 (1991 Study) 43,980 2,585 4,535
For Buildout conditions, the Facilities Manaqement Zone (FMZ) 13 report states that the expected
trip generation for the zone is approximately 69,750 daily trips, 5,690 morning peak hour trips,
and 7,930 evening peak hour trips. The trip generation estimates from the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan for the Buildout conditions are approximately 70,000 daily trips, 6,075 morning peak
hour trips, and 7,960 evening peak hour trips. Comparing these estimates to those shown in
Table 6, the daily estimates from this study are within approximately one percent of those
included in the FMZ 13 study and the Specific Plan. The peak hour trip generation differences
are somewhat higher. The proposed trip generation under Buildout conditions for all three
studies are summarized below:
Oailv Trips AM PK HR PM PK HR
Zone 13 (1 994 Plan) (see Table 6) 69,380 3,650 6,900
FMZ 13 Study (1 991 Study) 69,750 5,690 7,930
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan 70,000 6,075 7,960
The differences in volumes between those shown in Tables 5 and 6 and those included in the
FMZ 13 study and Specific Plan (as outlined above) can be primarily attributed to a Slower
development phasing schedule and to the refinement in the project description. The Year 2000
differences in trip generation estimates are related to the slower absorption schedule. Originally,
30
the Carlsbad Ranch consisted of approximately 1.5 million square feet of general commercial
office development. Based on finer detailed information on the Ranch, the office uses have
decreased in total square footage. This is the primary component which causes the differences
in Buildout trip generation estimates.
FUTURE TRAFFIC LEVELS
Figures 10-1 2 show the total future peak hour traffic levels projected at the study intersections.
These represent the combination of future background traffic plus the Zone 13 project traffic
anticipated to occur in the Years 2000 and 201 0. Figures 10-1 2 show the traffic levels that will
be used to measure the future intersection and street section levels of service.
31
YEAR 2000 LFMP ZONE 13 WITH 8ACKCROUND PEAK HOUR TRAfflC VOLUMES
IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
This chapter presents the results of the analysis of the impact of the Zone 13 project on the local
street system. The analysis assesses the levels of service at each of the analyzed locations
under both Year 2000 scenarios and Buildout (Year 201 0) conditions with the development of the
proposed Zone 13 land uses.
FUTURE STREET NElWORK
As mentioned in the previous chapter, street network changes are expected in the future and
were assumed in the model projections. In addition to these changes, localized intersection
improvements were assumed to be in place for both the Year 2000 and Buildout conditions. It
should be noted that these improvements which have been assumed to be in place are not all
the responsibility of the LFM Zone 13. These improvements included traffic signals (at existing
stopcontrolled locations) and additional turn lanes at various intersections. These improvements
represent mitigation measures to existing conditions which are expected to be needed to
maintain acceptable levels of service and are as follows:
r. + Year 2000 Conditions
Avenida Encinas & Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal.
1-5 Southbound Ramos & Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal. Also, add southbound
left-turn lane and restripe westbound through lane for an additional left-turn lane. / -
' \P/ 1-5 Northbound RamDS & Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal.
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal. Also, provide an excluske left-
turn lane and a shared t~ugh/r~t-turn-~an~~~~e ~0~6ction. In the c/
northbound diremua a left-turn lane and restriEe the exdusive right-turn lane for a
shared through/right-turn lane. Also, add an eastbound left-turn lane and westbound
Paseo del Norte & Palomar AirDort Road - Provide a westbound exclusive right-turn lane. I,
1
,I shared throughhight-turn lane. A 7 - -- -
35
9 2 Car Countw Drive & Cannon Road - Install a traffic signal. hovide an exclusive leftrturn ,
lane and two through lanes in the westbound direction. In the northbound direction, add
an exclusive right-turn lane. f i
Leao Drive & Cannon Road - Provide the following lane configuration at this intersection: _. -
two left-turn lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane in the northbound direction; two e-' through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane in the eastbound direction: and two left-turn
lanes and two through lanes in the westbound direction.
Armada Drive/Price Club Drivewav & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound
approach for two left-turn lanes and a shared throughhight-turn lane. In the southbound
direction provide two left-turn lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and an exclusive 7
right-turn lane. Also, add a eastbound left-turn lane and a westbound exclusive right-turn
lane. I'
Colleae Boulevard & Palomar Airport Road - Provide two left-turn lanes, one through lane,
and one shared throughhight-turn lane in the northbound direction. Restripe the
southbound approach for a left-turn lane, one through lane, and a shared throughhight-
turn lane.
-.
d\ . /- ,
Buildout Conditions (in addition to the above)
.I: Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road - Provide an additional eastbound and ' r. westbound through lane.
-* ,PJ'$f
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road - Add a northbound exclusive right-turn lane. P
' & LL,7 Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airport Road - Provide an eastbound exclusive right-turn lane. ,
The lane configurations which were assumed for both the Year 2000 and Buildout conditions are
shown in Appendix A.
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Based on the City of Carlsbad's Growth Management Standards, a Level of Service D would be
the minimum acceptable level of service during the weekday peak hours. Therefore,
improvements would be necessary under either Year 2OOO scenario and Buildout conditions for
locations operating at a LOS E or F during the weekday peak hours. An off-peak analysis was
also conducted at selected locations and concluded that the City's off-peak operating standard
(LOS C) would be satisfied.
36
YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WITH CANNON ROAD EXTENSION
This section presents an analysis of Year 2000 traffic conditions with the development of the
Zone 13 land uses as shown on Table 5. The Year 2000 peak hour traffic volumes, illustrated
on Figure 10 were analyzed to determine the V/C ratio and LOS for each of the analyzed
locations. Table 7 summarizes these results for the analyzed intersections while Table 8 shows
the projected volumes and level of service results for the seven analyzed street segments.
As indicated in Table 7, two of the sixteen analyzed intersections are expected to exceed the
Growth Management Standard under the Year 2000 - With Cannon Road Extension conditions
(without mitigations). The intersections projected to operate at a LOS E or F during the one of
the weekday peak hours are:
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road (PM peak hour)
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
Table 8 shows that all of the analyzed street segments would operate at acceptable levels of
service under Year 2000 conditions.
YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WITHOUT CANNON ROAD EXTENSION
The second column of capacity calculation results shown in Table 7 summarizes the results for
the analyzed intersections under the assumption that Cannon Road will not be extended to El
Carnino Real by the Year 2000. As indicated in Table 7, two of the sixteen analyzed intersections
are expected to exceed the Growth Management Standard under this scenario. The intersections
projected to operate at a LOS E or F during the one of the weekday peak hours are:
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
College Boulevard & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
Table 8 shows that all of the analyzed street segments would operate at acceptable levels of
service under Year 2000 conditions even without the extension of Cannon Road.
37
TABLE 7
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS WITHOUT MlTlGATlONS
I INTERS ECTlON
A Avenida Encjnas &
1' ' Palomar Airport Rd.
3( 1-5 southbound ramps
Cannon Rd.
1-5 northbound ramps &
'kannon Ad. 'x 1-5 southbound ramps & ,/
Palomar Airport Rd.
1-5 northbound ramps &3! ' Palomar Airport Rd.
Paseo del None 8 A
Cannon Rd.
Paseo del Norte &
Palomar Airport Rd.
fi( Car Country Or. & J
Cannon Rd.
Cannon Rd.
Avenida Encinas 8 j "
-
P
\
x
\
3.0. Leg0 Or. & u'
/'. Cannon Rd.
y Armanda DrJPrice Club Driveway &
Palomar Airport Rd.
1!. Hidden Valley Rd. &
' Palomar Airport Rd.
d
td. college 81. 8
Palomar Airport Rd.
El Camino Real & 1 ' Cannon Rd.
l/ Camino Vida Roble & d
Palomar Airport Rd.
El Camino Real & J 1 ' Palomar Airpon Rd.
PEAK
HOUR
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
YEAR 2000 WI
:ANNON RD. EXT.
VIC LOS
0.38 A
0.41 A.
0.75 C-
0.63 8..
0.57 A
0.64 8
0.57 A
0.42 A.
0.38 A
0.49 A
0.59
0.73
0.74
0.83
0.30
0.52
0.27
0.62
0.45
0.67
0.58
0.69
0.45
0.83
0.50
0.58
0.54
0.71
0.86 -- 0.83
A
C
C
D
A
A
A'
8.
A
8
A
8,
A
D
A
A
A
C
0.
0-
YEAR2000WIO 1
CANNON RD. EXT. BUILDOUT
VIC . LOS VIC LOS
0.38 A 0.61 8 '
0.42 A 0.46 A '
0.76 C
0.74 C
0.54 A 0.78 CJ
0.50 A 0.83 DI
0.55 A 0.75 G. ,
0.86 0
0.42 A 0.56 A *J
0.39 A 0.52 A J'
0.52 A 0.65 E'.''
0.52 A
0.73 C
0.79 c
0.84 0
0.17 A
0.38 A
0.27 A
0.38 A
0.51 A
0.75 C
0.69 B
0.75 C
0.76 C
0.60 A-",
0.68 8
0.69 B-
0.86 O
0.56 A:.
0.81 0
0.68 8 I
0.75 C .
0.76 C"
fl ......_.......,._ - Unacceptable level of service.
38
680 0.19 A i 453 0.13 A
1 740 0.21 A
1,122 0.31 A
i
1
NA
NA
NA
NA
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
I I YEAR 2O00 W/O PEAK
HOUR
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM WK PM
BUILDOUT
VOL. v/c LOS
1,169 0.32 A
2,367 0.66 B
2,662 0.74 C
2,100 0.58 A
SEGMENT
A. CannonRd.
between 1-5 and Paseo del Norte
DIRECTION
WB
€0
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
--
3,600
3,600
1,663 0.46 A
1,518 0.42 A
1,683 0.47 A
816 0.23 A
3,600
3,600
3.600
3,600
663 0.18 A
574 0.16 A
1,121 0.31 A
1,293 0.36 A
219 0.06 A
496 0.14 A
1,017 0.28 A
429 0.12 A
1,068 0.30 A
1,587 0.44 A
1,809 0.50 A 1,640 0.46 A
8. CannonRd.
between Paseo del Nom and Leg0 Dr.
~
3,600
3,600
3.600
3,600
~~~ ~
2,286 0.64 B 1,712 0.48 A
1,378 0.38 A
936 0.26 A
WB
EB
WB EB
WB
€6
WB
EB
WB
€6
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
--
C. CannonRd. west of El Camlno Real
1,284 0.24 A
1,719 0.32 A
3,096 0.57 A
1,335 0.25 A
1,436 0.27 A
1,763 0.33 A
3,069 0.57 A
1,798 0.33 A
1,752 0.32 A
2,548 0.47 A
3,544 0.66 B
1,800 0.33 A
WK AM
WK AM
WKPM
WK PM
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
' 5,400
D. Palomar Airport Rd.
between 1-5 and Paseo del Nme
~~
1,181
2,248
2,858
1.31 3
1,015
1,286
1.968
1,053
0.22 A
0.42 A
0.53 A
0.24 A
~
1.587
2,377
3,071
1,854
1,053
1,313
1,965
1,236
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
-
1,611 0.30
3.173 0.59
3,309 0.61
1,800 0.33
1,201 0.22
1,961 0.36
2,036 0.30
1,336 0.25
0.29 A
0.44 A
0.57 A
0.34 A
0.20 A
0.24 A
0.36 A
0.23 A
E. Palomar Alrport Rd.
between Paseo del Norte and Armada Or.
5.400
5,400
5,400
5,400
0.19 A
0.24 A
0.36 A
0.20 A
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
WK AM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
F. Palomar Alrporl Rd.
between College 81. & Camlno VMa Roble
1,200 0.33 A
849 0.24 A
1,238 0.34 A
885 0.25 A
3,600/5.400 111
3,60015,400
1,435 0.27 A
1,097 0.20 A
1,385 0.26 A
1,337 0.25 A
G. Palomar Alrport Rd.
tetween Camlno Vlda Roble i% El Camlno Real
1,534 0.43 A
1.274 0.35 A
1,501 0.42 A
3'600/5'400 3,600/5,400 I 1,091 0.30 A
~ Notes:
I 1 Capacity based on 1.800 vehlcles per lane per hour. 7
ill Under buildout conditlons Palomar Alrporl Road wlll be a six lane facility.
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The Buildout (Year 2010) peak hour traffic volumes, illustrated on Figure 12 for weekday
conditions were analyzed to determine the V/C ratio and LOS for each of the analyzed locations.
The final column of Table 7 summarizes the capacity calculation results for the analyzed
intersections while Table 8 shows the projected volumes and level of service results for the street
segments. As indicated on Table 7, seven oPthe sixteen analyzed intersections are expected to
be impacted under Buildout conditions without mitigations. The intersections projected to
operate at unacceptable levels of service, unless mitigated, are:
Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours) . .
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road (PM peak hour)
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road (AM & PM peak hours)
Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours)
El Camino Real & Cannon Road (AM peak hour)
El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours)
Table 8 shows that all of the analyzed street segments would operate at acceptable levels of
service under Buildout conditions.
The following chapter of this report summarizes the mitigation measures necessary to address
the deficient intersections identified above.
40
Year 2OOO Conditions
1-5 Northbound RamDs & Cannon Road - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road approach for the following: one through lane, one shared throughiright-turn lane, and one exclusive
right-turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the intersection would
operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development phasing of the zone,
this improvement would be needed in 2000.
1-5 Northbound RamDs & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the westbound Palomar Airport
Road approach for the following: two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development
phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 1997.
Year 2000 Without Cannon Road Extension
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the westbound Palomar Airport
Road approach for the following: two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development
phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 1997.
Colleae Boulevard & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the southbound College Boulevard
approach for the following: one left-turn lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one
exclusive right-turn lane. Under 2000 conditions, the northbound approach at this
intersection is a driveway serving uses directly south of Palomar Airport Road therefore,
provide one southbound throughhight-turn lane should be adequate. With the
implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable levels
of service. Based on the development phasing of the zone, this improvement would be
needed in 1997.
Buildout Conditions
Avenida Encinas & Palomar AirDort Road - Restripe the northbound Avenida Encinas
approach to provide the following configuration: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through
lane, and one right-turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development
phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 2007.
1-5 Northbound RamDs & Cannon Road - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road approach
for the following: one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive
right-turn lane. In addition, provide an additional eastbound Cannon Road left-turn lane.
The resulting lane configuration on the eastbound approach would be two exclusive left-
turn lanes and two through lanes. With the implementation of these improvements, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development
phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 2008.
42
1-5 Northbound RamDs & Palomar AirPort Road -The improvement described for the Year
2000 would also mitigate this location under Buildout conditions. Based on the
development phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 1998.
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road - The southbound approach (SDG&E driveway) should
be constructed and striped as follows: one exclusive left-turn lane, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, the eastbound Cannon Road approach would require an additional left-turn lane. The resulting lane configuration in the eastbound direction would be two exclusive left-turn lanes, one
through lane, and one throughlright turn lane. Also, at a point east of the intersection,
an additional westbound Cannon Road through lane would be required. At the
intersection, this would result in the following lane configuration in the westbound
direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared throughhight-turn
lane. With the implementation of these improvements, the intersection would operate at
acceptable levels of service. Based on the development phasing of the zone, this
improvement would be needed at Buildout conditions.
Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound and southbound
Paseo del Norte approaches to provide the following: two exclusive left-turn lanes, one
shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. With the implementation
of this improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service.
Based on the development phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed at
Buildout conditions. ,
El Camino Real & Cannon Road - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real approach for
the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared throughlright-turn lane,
and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the
eastbound Cannon Road approach. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the development
phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 2006.
El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound El Camino Real
approach for the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes,. one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. With the implementation of this
improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on
the development phasing of the zone, this improvement would be needed in 2008.
The improvements and the resulting lane configurations at the impacted locations are illustrated
in Appendix A.
EFFECT OF MmGATlON MEASURES
With the implementation of the suggested improvements, the impacted locations would be
mitigated to acceptable levels. Table 9 summarizes the effects of the proposed mitigation
43
TABLE 9
0.75 C
2. Avenlda Enclnas &
Palomar Alrporl Ad.
4. 1-5 northbound ramps &
Cannon Rd.
6. 1-5 northbound ramps b
Palomar Alrporl Rd.
7. Paseo del Norte 6.
Cennan Rd.
8. ease0 del Nwie a
Fatomar Alrport Rd.
13. College 81. &
Palomar AtrpMt Rd.
14. El Camlno flea1 b
Cannon Rd.
16. El Camlno Real b
Palomar AlrporI Rd.
E- Unacceptable level of servlce.
PEAK
HOUR
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK FM
WK AM
WK PM
WU AM
WK PM
WU AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
YEAR 2000 AND BUILDOUT CONDITIONS WITH MlTiGATlONS
YEAR 2OOO WIO
MITIGATIONS v/c 10s
0.75 C
0.63 B
0.57 A
0.49 A
069 A
0.73 C
0.74 C
0.83 D
0.45 A
0.83 D
0.50 A
0.58 A
0.86 D
0.83 D
YUR2000wml
VIC LOS
0.75 C
0.63 6
0.57 A
0.75 C
MrnGAnws
0.49 A
0.73 C
0.59 A
0.73 C
0.74 C
0.83 D
0.45 A
0.83 D
0.50 A
0.58 A
0.86 0
0.83 0
YEAR 2OOO WIO
CANNON flO. m. WIO
MITIGATIONS vtc LOS
0.76 C
0;74 c
0.55 A
0.86 D
0.52 A
0.52 A
0.73 c
0.79 C
0.84 D
0.76 C
NA NA
NA NA
0.86 D
0.87 0
I BUlLoOuT WIO I BUILDOUT WITH
YEAR 2OOO WK)
CANNON flD.
0.76 C
0.74 C
0.55 A
0.86 D
0.52 A
0.80 C
0.52 A
0.73 C
0.79 C
0.84 0
0.60 A
0.90 D
NA NA
NA NA
0.86 0
0.87 o
0.76 C
0.86 0
0.86 D
0.86 D
0.89 D
0.68 B
0.87 D
0.63 B
0.87 D
0.85 0
0.88 D
0.81 D
9.89 D
0.76 C
0.86 0
0.88 D
0.78 C
0.83 D
0.81 D
I
(11 - Levels of servlce based on !talk volumes which Include cllywide and reglonal bulldoul conditions.
measures. As shown on the table, the implementation of the mitigation measures proposed
above would reduce the V/C ratios and resulting levels of service to levels within the City of
Carlsbad's Growth Management Standards. It should be noted that all the levels of service
analyses and mitigation measures were based on future conditions which include the clty-wide
and region buildout and other background traffic.
45
VI. ARMADNLEGO INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
When the Carlsbad LEG0 Family Park proposed its roadway system, it proposed to place a
traffic circle/roundabout at the intersection of Armada Drive and Leg0 Drive. Because the City
of Carlsbad was concerned with the operations and ultimate capacity of the roundabout, Kaku
Associates was asked to review the design and potential performance of the roundabout under
Buildout Conditions for Zone 13. In addition, three alternate configurations for a more traditional
T-intersection were evaluated.
The following paragraphs describe the results of the capacity calculations for the various
Armada/Lego Drive configurations.
TRADITIONAL INTERSECTION DESIGN
Three different intersection configurations were investigated for the traditional approach of
signalizing the intersection of Armada Drive/Lego Drive.
The first alternate involved keeping Leg0 Drive as a continuous north-south street. Armada Drive
would be rerouted to "T" into Leg0 Drive in an east-west direction (see sketch on Table 10,
Alternate A). The heaviest movement in the morning peak hour involves southbound vehicles
desiring to turn westbound into the employment area of Zone 13. In the morning peak hour, this
movement must handle over 1,250 vehicles per hour. Because of this heavy turn movement, the
intersection would perform at Level of Service 0 during the morning peak hours. All other hours
of the day, including weekend conditions, would result in excellent operations at this signalized
intersection.
If Armada Drive and the north section of Leg0 Drive were kept continuous and the south section
of Leg0 Drive became the third leg of the T-intersection (Alternate B on Table lo), the intersection
would operate satisfactorily during the morning and afternoon peak hours. The level of Service
46
TABLE 10
ARMADA DR./LfCO DR.
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION
Armada Or. (€6) T-ing into Leg0 Dr.
PEAK BUILDOUT
HOUR V/C LOS
WK AM 0.81 D WK PM 0.55 A WKENO 0.56 A
LEGO PK 0.60 A
I I
Leg0 inbound grade separated
Leg0 Dr. (We) T-ing
into Armada Dr.
WK AM WK PM
WKENO
LEGO PK
WK AM
WK PM
WKEND LEGO PK
Lego inbound grade separated
no left-turns.
0.45 A
0.80 C
0.87 D
0.65 e
WK AM
WK PM
WKEND
LEGO PK
0.81 D
0.45 A 0.56 A
0.39 A
I I I 0.45 A
0.53 A 0.60 A
0.39 A
B UI LDO UT VOLUMES
Ln)md:
XXX (XXX) AU(PU) Pwk Hour Traffic Volume8 AU Volumea Rmmdbd to the Moored - 5 Vrhicka
would degrade on weekends and during the morning hours when inbound traffic to LEGO Family
Park was at its peak. Even under these conditions, however, the intersection would still meet the
City's Level of Service D criteria.
Alternate C on Table 10 shows the effects of grade-separating the inbound traffic headed toward
the LEGO Family Park. Under this scenario, southbound traffic destined for the LEGO Family
Park would travel through an underpass under the southwest leg of Armada Drive. Under this
configuration, excellent levels of service would be provided during the afternoon peak hours and
during weekend and LEGO Park peak inbound operations. The morning peak hour for this
configuration would still operate at Level of Service D because the southbound to westbound
right-turn still requires a significant amount of the signal cycle. Level of Service 0 operations,
however, would result.
A fourth alternate (Alternate D on Table 10) would involve a variation of Alternate 6. If the
westbound to southbound left-turn in this configuration were grade-separated (Le., the
southbound traffic on tego Drive headed toward the EGO Family Park) and northbound left-turn
was prohibited, the intersection would operate at Level of Service A during all time periods.
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS
The firm of Penfield & Smith, experts in the design and operation of roundabouts, were asked
to review the proposed traffic volumes and develop a design for the roundabout which would
result in satisfactory operations under Buildout Conditions. The resulting design is shown in
Figure 13. In the proposed roundabout design, a roundabout with a 138-foot outside radius
would satisfactorily accommodate future traffic levels through this intersection.
The proposed roundabout design incorporates two "bypass" lanes. The first would allow
northbound traffic leaving LEGO Family Park and headed for Cannon Road to stay in the right
lane and completely bypass going through the roundabout itself. Similarly, a bypass lane has
been provided so that the southbound to westbound heavy right turn headed to the Zone 13
employment areas could go directly through the intersection without passing through the
roundabout.
48
FIGURE 13
ROUNDABOUT DESIGN
49
With the traffic volumes shown in Table 10 and the design shown in Figure 13, the roundabout
itself is projected to operate at Level of Service A during both weekday and weekend peak hours.
Table 11 shows the results of the roundabout capacity calculations using the RODEL computer
software analysis program.
SUMMARY
There are a number of different configurations that would allow the intersection of Armada Drive
and Leg0 Drive to operate within the City's level of service criteria - even under Buildout
Conditions. The intersection could be configured as a signalized T-intersection, or a roundabout
could be designed as shown in Figure 13. Since both an at-grade signalized T-intersection or
an at-grade roundabout provide acceptable levels of service, grade-separating any movements
at this location may be undesirable due to the associated costs.
50
TABLE 11
PEAK
ROUNDABOUT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
BUILDOUT
DELAY
INTERSECTION I HOUR (SEC.) LOS
WK AM
WK PM
WEEKEND
0.19 A
4.88 A
3.12 A
51
VII. KELLY PROJECT ANALYSIS
As mentioned in Chapter Ill, the parcel along the south side of Palomar Airport Road from Hidden
Valley Road to College Boulevard (known as the Kelly Parcel) has applied for a zone change
from industrial to commercial land use. The Kelly Parcel is not part of the LFM Zone 13 however
the traffic associated with the parcel will affect the future conditions. The basic study included
in this report assumed a continuation of the industrial classification for this parcel. This chapter
discusses the impacts associated with the proposed land use changes and defines mitigation
that might be necessitated by the change in land use.
TRIP GENERATION
In the background model projections, the trips associated with the Kelly project were based on
approximately 33 acres of industrial. If the land use changed from industrial to commercial, the
number of trips generated by the parcel would greatly increase. Using a proposed size of
356,756 square feet of commercial uses, the parcel would generate approximately 25,000 daily
trips with approximately 750 trips occurring during the morning peak hour and 2,500 trips during
the evening peak hour. Table 12 illustrates the difference in trips associated with the change in
land use from industrial to commercial. As can be seen, an additional 22,OOO daily trips, 420
morning peak hour trips, and 2,145 evening peak hour trips would be expected from the parcel.
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
The additional trips which would be generated by the change in land use were assigned to the
future street system for Buildout conditions, The resulting peak hour traffic volumes for Buildout
conditions with the Kelly parcel developed as commercial uses are illustrated on Figure 14.
52
TABLE 12
I SIZE 1 DAILY
KELLY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL LAND USE
INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL
33 AC 3.000 295 35330 70 285 355
356,756 SF 25,OOO 450 300 750 1,250 1,250 2,500
DIFFERENCE
- Note: Trip generations based on rates included in 'San Diego Traffic Generators' ;
San Diego Association of Government (October 1993)..
22,OOO 155 265 420 1,180 965 2,145
.
53
BUllOOUT CONDITIONS WITH KELLY COMMERCIAL PARCEL PEAK HOUR TIW' iilUMES
BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The Buildout peak hour traffic volumes including the Kelly parcel as a commercial development
(Figure 14) for weekday conditions were analyzed to determine the V/C ratio and LOS for each
of the analyzed locations. Table 13 summarizes the results. For purposes of comparison, the
V/C ratios and levels of service are shown for Buildout conditions with the Kelly parcel as
industrial uses. As shown, ten of the sixteen analyzed intersections are expected to operate at
unacceptable levels of service with the commercial parcel. This is three more than conditions
with the industrial parcel. The intersections projected to operate at a unacceptable levels of
service are:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
e
0
Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours)
1-5 Northbound Ramps 81 Cannon Road (PM peak hour)
1-5 Northbound Ramps 81 Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road (AM & PM peak hours)
Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours)
Hidden Valley Road & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
College Boulevard & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
Camino Vida Roble & Palomar Airport Road (PM peak hour)
El Camino Real & Cannon Road (AM peak hour)
El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Road (AM & PM peak hours)
M IT1 GATl ON MEASURES
Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound Avenida Encinas
approach to provide the configuration: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through lane, and
one right-turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the intersection would
operate at acceptable levels of service.
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road
approach for the following: one through lane, one shared througwright-turn lane, and
one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an additional eastbound Cannon Road
left-turn lane. The resulting lane configuration on the eastbound approach would be two
exclusive left-turn lanes and two through lanes. With the implementation of these
improvements, the intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service.
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the westbound Palomar Airport
Road approach for the following: two through lanes, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right turn lane. After implementation of this improvement, additional
physical improvements and/or reduction in land use density would need to be
implemented in order to improve operating conditions to acceptable levels.
55
TABLE 13
PEAK
HOUR
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
BUILDOUT WITH KELLY PROJECT WITHOUT MITIGAllONS
KELLY PARCEL KELLY PARCEL
(IN WSIRIAL) (COMMERCIAL) CHANGE IN
VIC LOS VJC LOS VJC INTERSECTION
1. Avenida Encinas &
2. Avenida Encinas 8
Cannon Rd.
Palomar Airport Rd.
3. 1-5 southbound ramps &
Cannon Rd.
4. 1-5 northbound ramps&
Cannon Rd.
5. 1-5 southbound ramps &
Palomar Airport Rd.
6. 1-5 northbound ramps 8
Palomar Airport Rd.
7. Paseo del Norte &
Cannon Rd.
8. Paseo del None &
Palomar Airport Rd.
9. Car Country Or. &
Cannon Rd.
Cannon Rd.
10. Leg0 Or. &
WK AM
WK PM
11. Armanda Dr./Price Club Di,veway 8
Palomar Airport Rd.
0.61 8 0.61 B
0.46 A 0.46 A
12. Hidden Valley Rd. 8
Palomar Airport Rd.
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
13. College El. &
Palomar Airport Rd.
0.56 A 0.56 A
0.52 A 0.55 A
0.65 8 0.69 B
14. El Camino Real &
Cannon Rd.
0.60 A
0.68 8
0.69 E
0.86 D
15. Camino Vida Roble &
Palomar Airport Rd.
0.60 A
0.68 B
0.69 8
0.86 0
16. El Camino Real &
Palomar Airport Rd.
~~~~ ~~
Note:
..::% ....., - Unacceptable level of service. m-
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
W.K PM
0.67 B
0.90 D
WK AM WK PM . 0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.04-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.1 8
0.03
0.20
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.07
0.01
56
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road - The southbound approach (SDGE driveway) should be constructed and striped as follows: one exclusive left-turn lane, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, the eastbound
Cannon Road approach would require an additional left-turn lane. The resulting lane configuration in the eastbound direction would be two exclusive left-turn lanes, one
through lane, and one through/right turn lane. Also, at a point east of the intersection,
an additional westbound Cannon Road through lane would be required. At the
intersection, this would result in the following lane configuration in the westbound
direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared throughhight-turn
lane. With the implementation of these improvements, the intersection would operate at
acceptable levels of service.
Paseo del Norte 8t Palomar AirDort Road - Restripe the northbound and southbound Paseo del Norte approaches to provide the following: two exclusive left-turn lanes, one
shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. After implementation
of this improvement, additional physical improvements and/or reduction in land use
density would need to be implemented in order to improve operating conditions to
acceptable levels.
Hidden Vallev Road & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the southbound Hidden Valley
Road approach for the following: one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared
throughhight-turn lane. With the implementation of these improvements, the intersection
would operate at acceptable levels of service.
Colleae Boulevard & Palomar Airport Road - Provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the
southbound College Boulevard approach. This would result in the following
configuration: one exclusive left-turn lane, one through lane, one shared throughhight-
turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an eastbound free-flow
right-turn lane. With the implementation of these improvements, the intersection would
operate at acceptable levels of service.
El Camino Real & Cannon Road - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real approach for
the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared throughlright-turn lane,
and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the
eastbound Cannon Road approach. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service.
Camino Vida Roble & Palomar Airport Road - Provide an additional northbound Camino
Vida Roble left-turn lane. This would result in two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and
one exclusive right-turn lane. With the implementation of this improvement, the
intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service.
El Camino Real & Palomar AirDort Road - Restripe the northbound El Camino Real
approach for the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. With the implementation of this
improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service.
As stated above, it is expected that two intersections (1-5 NB/Palomar Airport Road & Paseo del
Norte/Palomar Airport Road) would not be mitigated to acceptable levels. Table 14 summarizes
the effects of the mitigation measures at the impacted locations.
THRESHOLD ANALYSIS
From the analyses conducted for the Kelly commercial project, it was determined that operating
conditions at two intersections could not be improved to acceptable levels. These results were
based on the maximum amount of commercial development on the parcel. A threshold analysis
was conducted to determine the amount of commercial development which could occur on the
Kelly parcel without creating any unmitigatable impacts. It was determined that approximately
190,000 square feet of commercial uses could be developed on the parcel. With the
development of 190,000 square feet of commercial uses all impacts could be mitigated to
acceptable levels.
58
TABLE 14
PEAK
HOUR
. INTERSEwTION LEVELS OF SERVILE ANALYSIS
BUILDOUT WITH KELLY COMMERCIAL PARCEL WlTH MITIGATIONS
BUILDOUT WI MK.
VIC LOS VIC LOS INTERSECTION
2. Avenida Encinas &
Palomar Airport Rd.
4. 1-5 northbound ramps &
Cannon Rd.
6. 1-5 northbound ramps &
Palomar Airport Rd.
7. Paseo del Norte &
Cannon Ad.
8. Paseo del Norte &
Palomar Airport Rd.
12. Hidden Valley Rd. &
Palomar Airport Rd.
13. College 81. 8
Palomar Airport Rd.
14. El Camino Real &
Cannon Rd.
15. Camino Vida Roble &
Palomar Airport Rd.
16. El Camino Real &
Palomar Airport Rd.
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
WK AM
WK PM
0.86 D
0.89 D
0.85 D
0.88 D
0.69 B
0.88 D
0.79 C
0.88. 0
0.88 0
0.88 D
0.64 B
0.80 c
0.84 D
0.84 D
- Note:
111 Unacceptable levels of service remain after mitigation.
59
VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
This report documents the findings of a traffic study conducted by Kaku Associates, Inc. to
determine the potential street system improvements necessitated by the development of the City
of Carlsbad Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
The analyses conclude that the recommended phased street improvements, based on ultimate
buildout conditions, should be:
1997
2000
2007
2006
2008
2008
Buildout
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the westbound Palomar
Airport Road approach for the following: two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right turn lane.
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road
approach for the following: one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right-turn lane.
Avenida Encinas & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound Avenida
Encinas approach to provide the configuration: one exclusive left-turn lane, one
through lane, and one right-turn lane..
El Camino Real & Cannon Road - Restripe the southbound El Camino Real
approach for the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the northbound El Camino Real
approach for the following: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
1-5 Northbound Ramps & Cannon Road - Restripe the westbound Cannon Road
approach for the following: one through lane, one shared throughhight-turn lane,
and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, provide an additional eastbound
Cannon Road left-turn lane. The resulting lane configuration on the eastbound
approach would be two exclusive left-turn lanes and two through lanes.
Paseo del Norte & Cannon Road - The southbound approach (SDG&E driveway)
should be constructed and striped as follows: one exclusive left-turn lane, one
shared throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane. In addition, the
eastbound Cannon Road approach would require an additional left-turn lane. The
resulting lane configuration in the eastbound direction would be two exclusive left-
turn lanes, one through lane, and one throughhight turn lane. Also, at a point
east of the intersection, an additional westbound Cannon Road through lane
would be required. At the intersection, this would result in the following lane
configuration in the westbound direction: one exclusive left-turn lane, two through
lanes, and a shared throughhight-turn lane.
Buildout Paseo del Norte & Palomar Airoort Road - Restripe the northbound and
southbound Paseo del Norte approaches to provide the following: two exclusive
left-turn lanes, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn
lane.
If Cannon Road is not extended to the east by the Year 2000 the following improvements would
be necessary:
1997 1-5 Northbound Ramps & Palomar Airport Road - Restripe the westhound Palomar
Airport Road approach for the following: two through lanes, one shared
throughhight-turn lane, and one exclusive right turn lane.
1997 Colleae Boulevard & Palomar Aimort Road - Restripe the southbound College
Boulevard approach for the following: one left-turn lane, one shared throughhight-
turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane.
All of the analyzed street segments are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service;
therefore, the proposed street cross sections would be adequate to handle buildout traffic.
61
APPENDIX A
INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS
INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS
YUR 2000 MAR 2000 WlTH YmCATlON
1. Avenida Encinas &
Connon Rd. WE As NO MmwnoN MISTING REQUIRED
NO MITKAKON SAME As NO UlTlCATlON
REWIRED MlSllNC RE PURE D
NO MITIi3lION NO YWKON REQUIRED REOUlRED 2. Avenida Encinas d! Pahar Airport Rd.
WE As
MlSnNC
c 5* NO MlllGATDN SAME As NO MITIGATION REQUIRED YEAR 2000 RE aUm NO YrnmnoN
REWIRED 3. 1-5 SB ramps dr
Cannon Rd. Rd.
1-5 SB on mmp
Id W MI ramp
+-Me -
1-5 NB off mmp
4. 1-5 NE ramps &
Cannon Rd. WE As msnwc
NO YmCATYWJ WEAS NO MITIGATION
REQUIRED OISTINC RE QUIRE D NO MITIG4llDN REQUIRED WE As MISTING 5. 1-5 SB ramps & Polomor Airport Rd.
1-5 NB on romp
I: 6. 1-5 NB ramps Polomor Airport Rd.
WE As EXISTING
-I 1-5 NB btl romp 1-5 NB bff mmp
\ KAKU ASSOCIATES -
7. Paseo Del Me L Cannon Rd.
8. Paseo Del Node & Palomar Airport Rd.
9. Cor Country Dr. 6 Cannon Rd.
10. Leg0 Dr. 6 Cannon Rd.
11. Armoda Rd. & Pakmor Urport Rd.
12. Hidden Valley Rd 6 Palomar Airport Rd.
MlSlWG
INTERSE CTlON CONFIGURATIONS
YCAR 2000
Po3so lid Me
DOES NOT am
WES NOT am
. Pobw hipoft Rd.
Polmor Eiirport Rd
YEAR 2000 WnH UIwm
NO MIIIGAWN REQUIRLD
NO urnam REWIRED
No umw REOUlRfD
No k4rnGATW)N REWIRED
Yuff 2000 W/O CANNON RD. BUILDOW oc1. W/ MITlGATlON EUIw)UT WITH WTlCATloN
KAKU ASSOCIATES -J
NO MmGATK)N REQUYlED
NO MmcATKxl REQUIRED
No uITIG4nDN REWO SAME AS MAR 2000
NO MinanoN REWIRED
SAME AS MAR 2000
No NlTlG4llON REWIRED
NO WnCATlON RE(I(IIRED NO wTIcATw)E( REWIRED SANEAS MAR ZOO0
NO MrnanoN REWIRED
\ INTERSE CTlON CONFIGURATIONS
EAR 2000
YWI 2000 W/O WON fB. BUllDOuT WIW MIT#;P;TION M1. W/ UmCATlON BUIW)UT WITH MrnwnoN unwu EXISlUG
*, I-
YEAR 2000
*, t!, It
13. College BI. & Palomar Airport Rd. NO MIlCAlION WE As NO MITIGATION REOUlRE 0 REOWRED Aitpcd Rd.
* Is
14. El Camino Real 6
Cannon Rd.
0 Comino Reo1
SANE. AS MISTING NO UITI(;ATIoN NO MlllCAllON REOUlAZO REOUREO
NO MITIGATION REOUREO 15. Camino Vda Robk & Polomor Airport Rd.
WE As EXLSlYJG
WE As 'I& D(RnNG SAHE AS fXISIUJC NO YWlDN NO MlTlChllON REOUYIEO REOUREO 16. El Camino Real & Palomar Airport Rd.
a comi Red
L CCACtU ASSOCIATES -
APPENOlX 8
CARLSBAD LEG0 FAMlLY PARK TRIP GENERATION
LEGO FAMILY PARK - TRIP GENERATION
YEAR 1999 - AUGUST FRIDAY
VISITOR AlTENDANCE:
ANNUAL = 1.80 MILLION
DAILY = 9.520
EMPLOYEES = 818
SERVICE VEHICLES - 71
VISITORS
LEGO
TOTAL Am.
PERSON TRIPS
In.
Out8
MODE
Drive Alone
C~pool
Tour Bur
Shunlo
OthwlWnlk
BU8
TOTAL
ZUPANCY
oriw AlocH
Carpoor
Tour Bu8
Shunle
Bur
OtherlWdk
Tal Vehicle8
AVR
PCE
CU
Tour Bur
Shuttle
Bur
Senrice Vehicle
DAILY PCE
Regional
84%
1% om
2% ow
0%
100% 0%
I .o
3.5
25.0
95.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
8.038
8.030
8.038
80
7.795
161
0
0
0
8.036
80
2,227
6
0
0
0
2.313
3.47
-
2.307
12
0
0
2.319
- -
11%
1%
25%
0%
41%
0%
100% 22%
1 .o
3.5
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
1.001
1 .m
1 ,om
10
252
0
413
0
333
1 .008
10
72
0
21
0
0
110
0.18
-
82
0
28
0
110
- -
5%
1%
Q8%
0%
0%
0%
1%
100% -
1 .o
3.5
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
476
476
476
5
466
0
0
0
5
476 -
5
133
0
0
0
138
3.45
0
138
0
0
0
138
- -
- TOW -
9.520
9.520
0.520
95
8.513
161
413
0
9.520
33p
85
2.432
6
28
0
0
2361
3.72
-
2,527
12
20
0 - -
2.m
EMPLOYEES
LEGO
-P(w
55%
3346
04c
0%
1046
2%
100%
-
1 .o
2.25
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
818
818
818
450
270
0
0
82
16
818 -
450
120
0
0
0
570
1 .u
9
CIo a
a
a - m
s.wico
Vehkkr
Lnrica Vehkle
ToW- 71
2.5 in
LEGO
TOTAL
10,338
10.338
Ws11
8.783 OMI
161 2%
413 4%
62 1%
10.338 100% 35425
648
2.w
8
28
0
0
3101
3.23
-
3.091 em
12 1%
21 146
0011
3.310 100%
in w --
LEGO FAMILY PARK - TRIP GENERATION
YEAR 1999 - AUGUST FRIDAY
0 .O% 0
0.0% 0
16.0% a1
23.0% 131
11.0% e3
16.0% 01
0.0% 0
17.0% 97
17.0% a7
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0
100.0% 570 I - 0.w -
LEGO EMPLOYEES
LEQO
ARRIVALS
- LEGO
Vahlcloa TOTAL
6;7 AM
7-8 AM
&oAM
e10 AM
10-11 AM
11-12 AM
12-1 PM
2-3 PM
3-4PM
4-5 PM
S-aPM
6-7 PM
7-9 PM
WPM
e10 PM
10-11 PM
11-12 PM
12-1 AM
1-2 AM
TOTAL
1-2 PM~
26
80
172
285
372
380
3n
3s3
2s5
187
0
0
0 I
2.567
JEPARTURES
e-7 AM
7-8 AM
84 AM
e10 AM
10-11 AM
11-12 AM
12-1 PM
1-2 PM
2-3 PM
3-4PM
4-5 PM
HPM
6-7 PM
7-8 PM
8-0 PM
9-10 PM
10-11 PM
11-12 PM
12-1 AM
1-2 AM
TOTAL
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.011 0
0.W 0
0.W 0
1 .016 1
3.1% 4
6.7% 9
11.1% 15
14.W 20 ' 14.8% 20
14.m 20
21
16
10 7.3%
0.011 0
0.W 0
1 ::E
'0.Ow B /100.W 131
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
10.0% 232
16.0% 371
17.5% 406
15.0% 34s
10.5% 243
. 10.5% 243
5.0% 116
8.0% 180
4.5% 104
3.0% 70
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0
100.0% 2.319
0.Ocn -
I
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
10.0% 11
16.0% 18
17.5% 19
15.0% 17
10.646 12
10.5% 12
5.0% 6
8.0% 9
4.5% 5
3.0% 3
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0
100.0% 110
0.0%. 0
- 0.096 -
1 I
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
1.0% 23
3.1% 72
6.7% 155
11.1% 251
14.5% 334
14.8% 3u
14.7% 341
15.3% 3U6
11.5% 267
7.3% 160
0.W 0
0.W 0
0
100.0% 2.319 -
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
1 .ow 1
3.1% 3
6.7% 7
11.1% 12
14.W 16
14.8% 16
14.m 16
11.3% 17
1l.W 13
7.3% 8
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
100.0% 110
- 0.0% P
lloul ~
I
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
10.0% 14
16.0% 22
17.- 24
15.0% 21
1o.m 14
10.5% 14
5.0% 7
8.0% 11
4.5% 6
3.0% 4
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0 0.0%
100.0% 13a - -
~~ '0l.l
0
0
0
251
41 1
440
385
260
28
121
200
115
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.561
n
-
0 :I 0.016
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
37.0%
23.0%
0.W
0.0%
24.0%
16.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21 1
131
0
0
137
01
0
0
ma g
0.0% 0
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
3.0% 6
3.m 6
3.0% 6
3.6% 6
3.8% 6
3.4% 6
3.4% 6
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.w 0
0.0% 0
0.0% - 0
100.0% 178
-
0
34
125
421
547
547
392
372
372
136
212
121
TI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.316
-
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
18.8% 34
' 3.6% 6
3.646 8
3.m 6
3.0% 6
3.m 6
3.4% 6
3.4% 6
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.096 0
100.0% 178
-
0
0
0
34
34
34
34
31
86
178
291
580
517
393
393
432
270
0
0
0
3.31;
I
LEGO FAMILY PARK - TRIP GENERATION
BUILDOUT - AUGUST FRIDAY
VISITOR ATTENDANCE:
ANNUAL - 2.20 MILLION
DAILY = 11,625
EMPLOYEES = 1 .Ooo
SERVICE VEHICLES - 87
VISITORS
TOTAL AR.
PERSON TRIPS
In8
Out*
MODE
Drive Alone
cupool Tour Bur
Shuttle
OtherMIdk
BU8
TOTAL
XCUPANCY
D* AlocH
Carpod
Tour Bu8
Shutlle
Bur
OtherWdk
Total Vehicle8
AVR
FCE
CU
Tour Bur
Shutu.
Bur
Service Vehiclo
DAILY PCE
86%
1%
87%
2%
0%
0%
100% 0%
1 .o
3.5
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0
10.030
10,030
10,030
100
8.735
201
0
0
0
10,036 -
100
2.781
8
0
0
0
2.869
3.47
-
2.881
10
0
0
2.887
- -
LEGO
Hotelr ILoul
0%
1%
25%
OW
41 W
0%
33%
100% -
1 .o
3.6
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
1.008 I*
1,008
1.008
10
252
0
413
0
333
1.001
-
10
72
0
28
0
0
110
8.16
-
82
0
28
0
110
- -
1%
08%
0% ow
0%
1%
looIc -
1 .o
3.5
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
581
581
581
0 wo
0
0
0
0
581
-
0
163
0
0
0
0
18
3.u
-
18
0
0
0
18
- -
~~
- Tal
11.825
11,625
11,025
116
10.5Sd
201
413
0
339
11.e25
-
1 16
3.016
8
28
0
0
3,198
3.87
-
3.132
10
28
0
3,178
- -
7
EMPLOYEES
LEGO
mPm
55%
33%
0%
0%
10%
2%
100% -
1 .o
2.25
25.0
15.0
0.0
0.0
1 .o
2.0
1 .o
2.0 -
1 .OOo
1 .Ooo
1 .OOo
550
330
0
0
100
20
1 .OOo
-
550
147
0
0
0
641
1 .a
g
ow
0
0
0
87
- -
S.mic0
Vehicle8
sofvica Vehicl.
Tow= 87
2.5 218
Note: - . PCE - Pawongar Cu Equivalent. A bum i8 oquivdent to 2.0 p.rmgr un and a andco Wick i8 oquinknt to 2.5 p.rmgr Un.
LEGO
TOTAL
12.62s
12.625
me596
10,See 86%
201 2%
413 3%
100 1%
359 3%
12.62s 100% --
3.163
8
28
0
0
3.952
3.18
3.829 01%
16 096
28 1%
0 ow
218 5%
4.091 100% --
LEGO FAMILY PARK - TRIP GENERATION
BUILDOUT - AUGUST FRIDAY
ARRIVALS I
VISITORS I
I
LEGO
Ifbaiond I HotoIa
0
0
0
318
501
ssd
478
333
333
158
254
143 as
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,178
-
0.0%
0.0%
18.0%
23.0%
11 .O%
18.0%
0.0%
17.0%
17.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0% -
6-7 AM
7-8 AM
8-8 AM
e10 AM
10-11 AM
11-12AM
12-1 PM
1-2 PM
2-3 PM
3-4PM
4-5 PM
SdPM
b7 PM
7-8 PM
8-9 PM
e10 PM
10-11 PM
11-12 PM
12-1 AM
1-2 AM
TOTAL
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
18.0%
17.5%
15.0%
10.5%
10.5%
5.0%
8.046
4.5%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
-
0
0
0
290
464
507
436
304
304
146
232
130
87
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.897
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
10.0% 11
16.0% 18
17.5% 10
15.0% 17
10.5% 12
10.- 12
5.0% 8
8.0% 0
4.5% 5
3.0% 3
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.m 0
0.0% 0
0
100.0% 110 - 0.0% -
JEPARTURES
b7 AM
7-8 AM
WAM
e10 AM
10-11 AM
11-12 AM
12-9 PM
1-2 PM
2-3 PM
3-4PM
4-5 PM
WPM
6-7 PM
7-8 PM
8-0 PM
e10 PM
10-11 PM
11-12 PM
12-1 AM
1-2 AM
TOTM
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1 .O%
3.1%
6.7%
11.1%
14.5%
14.8%
14.7%
15.3%
11.5%
7.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0% -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
00
194
322
420
429
420
443
333
21 1
0
0
0
2.607
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
1 .on 1
3.1% 3
0.m 7
11.1% 12
14.M 96
14.8% 10
14.m 16 1s.m 17
1l.M 13
7.3% 8
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0
100.011 110 0.01( -
~~
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
10.0% 17
18.0% n
17.5% 30
15.0% 2s
10.5% 18 lo.% 18
5.0% 8
8.0% 14
4.5% 8
3.0% S
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0
100.0% 18
0.046 -
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% '0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
1 .on 2
3.1% S
6.7% 11
11.1% 19
14.M 2s
14.8% 2s
14.7% 2s
15.3% 26
11.591 18
7.3% 12
0.091 0
0.0% 0
0
100.011 18 s.on -
EMPLOYEES rpzi-
0
0
112 la
77
112
0
118
118
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ea7 -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
91
213.
353
461
470
467
486 as
232
0
0
3,176
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
37.0% 250
23.0% 100
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
24.0% 167
16.0% 112
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0 - 100.0% G
s.Mo.
Vohkkr
0.09) 0
18.8% 41
18.8% 41
18.8% 41
3.0% 8
3.0% 8
3.6% 8
3.6% 8
3.6% 8
3.4% 7
3.4% 7
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
100.0% 218
ia.845 41
0.0% 0 -
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
18.8% 41
18.8% 41
18.8% 41
11.8% 41
3.6% 8
3.6% 8
3.6% 8
3.W 8
3.6% 8
3.4% 7
3.4% 7
0.011 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.011 0
0.0% 0
100.0% 218
0.0% 0 -
LEGO
TOTAL
0
41
152
518
e26
875
484
40
480
167
281
150
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.091 -
0
0
41 I
41 I 41
41
40
108
221
300
124 =:
474 1 4M
533
343
0
0
4,091
0
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
cost
$960.00
$200.00
i $340.00
RESTRIPING - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AT 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMP
4
Item Description Quantity
1,600 Feet
_______~ ~
Restriping
Unit Price
$O.6OiFoot
Light Signal Traffic
Control
Revise Signage
I
1
~~
$200.00 Each
I
Total I $1,500.00
I 15% Contingency 1 $225.00
I I I TOTAL I$1,725.00
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
Description
Restriping
Light Signal Traffic Control
Revise Signage
RESTRIPING - COLLEGE BLVD. AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
Quantity Unit Price cost
900 Feet $0.6O/Foot $540.00
1 $200.00 Each $200.00
$260.00
I I I I i
Subtotal $1,000.00
15% Contingency
TOTAL
$150.00
$1,150.00
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
Quantity
420 Feet
420 Feet
2,520 Cubic Feet
5,040 Square Feet
5,040 Square Feet
1,680 Square Feet
1260 Feet
LANE CONSTRUCTION - PASEO DEL NORTE AT CANNON ROAD
Unit Price cost
$4.OO/Foot $1,680.00
$ 1 0. OO/Foot $4,200.00
$1.1 5/Cubic Foot $2,898.00
$1.40/Square Foot $7,056.00
$0.2O/Square Foot $1,008.00
$3 .5O/Square Foot $5,880.00
$0.60/Foot $756.00
Description
Subtotal
15% Contingency
TOTAL
Remove Curb and
Gutter
$23,478
$3,522
$27,000
New Curb and Gutter
Base Material
A. C. Paving
Subgrade Preparation
Revise Landscaping
Striping
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
~~~
Restriping
Light Signal Traffic
Control
RESTRIPING - PASEO DEL NORTE APPROACHES TO PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
~~ ~
2,000 Feet $0.60/Foot $1,200.00
2 $200.00 Each $400.00
I Description I Quantity I Unit Price I cost I
Revise Signage $400.00
15% Contingency
TOTAL
1 Subtotal I $2,000.00 I
$300.00
$2,300.00
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
RESTRTPING - EL CAMINO REAL / CANNON ROAD
Description Quantity Unit Price cost
Restnping 2,500 Feet $0.60/Foot $1,500.00
Replace A. C. Beam 500 Feet $S.OO/Foot $2,500.00
Light Signal Traffic 4 $200.00 Each $8 00.00
Control
Revise Signage $700.00
Subtotal $5,500.00
15% Contingency $825 .OO
I TOTAL I $6,325.00
APPENDIX A-5
CIRCULATION COST ESTIMATES
Quantity
150 Feet
150 Feet
720 Square Feet
ADD SIGNAL - CAR COUNTRY DRIVE / CANNON ROAD
&
PROVIDE 'RIGHT TURN ONLY ON CAR COUNTRY DRIVE AT CAIWON ROAD
Unit Price cost
$5.OO/Foot $750.00
$1 o.oo/Foot $1 , 500.00
$2.20/Square Foot $13 84.00
. Description
Remove Curb and
Gutter
New Curb and Gutter
' 15% Contingency
TOTAL
Pavement (A. C. and
Base)
Striping
Light Signal Traffic
Control
Signal Installation
Design of Signal
$14,349.00
$1 10,023.00
300 Feet
2
$0.60/Foot
$200.00 Each
Subtotal
$180.00
$400.00
$90,000.00
$1,250.00
~~~~
$95,664.00
- -- --_
. .. . ..: I ..
December7, 1994
FOR THE INFORMATION Of r THECIMC(?UNCiL
flu M.
Mr. David Haufer
2075 b Palmas Drive
Assistant CiEngYlctr
Caritbd CA 92OO9-1576
Re: Propossd Cannon Road West Fee Prom
Dear David:
Wt are in rdpt of your letter dated Novemba 17,1994 kr which you inmducd tho
Proposed Cannon Road West Fee Program We have serious concarnr with the equitable
distribution of the assermmu necessary to pay fbr the extension of Cannon Road.
Don Rose, Senior PIbnntr it SDG&E, has discussed our conceras with the City Eqheer.
The Planning Dirraor told us that there was a coacvn on the City's put that !he pmpm
description could be misconmued as not requiring bendthg pdtb to pay thdt fair shrve
of tht costs. He said these pups are beg assessed, though their fen are being paid by
particrs other than thenuelva
We wish to rateratc our concern and request a m&g h which yau may nrpfrin the
prow. Please contact me at 696-2483 of Don Rote at 696-2408 to
meet that is comrurient fbr you.
8 the to
Deccmba 13, 1994 CIU No.
he. Ray Patckt
City Manager
City oiCdsbd
Fax 720-9561
Re: Cyiobad City Council Agenda I39 #12,935, for 12/13/94 baring, rcguding
tomwioa of a CFD fbr improvements within the CarSsbd RMch Spscific PJm
Derr Mr. Patehstt:
This letta rhd mumoriaiira SDG&E's concan over the tbdoa of a Mdo-Roor
Communities Facilities District (CFD No. 3) to haace public improvements in
conjunction with Cultas' Cdsbad Ran& Swc Plan.
SDG&E proparty is shown as pair of the b&t area in the rgada biil h emr. Thii land
is not a part of Cdt& Culhd Ranch SP&C Plan and SDGBtE'should d~
obligations of this type resulting fiom Caritas' Carisbad Ranch Spdc Plan Amctldment.
We request clnrification of AB ti12.955, the exadom and qukneau phd hr En& East, particulariy in association with SDG&E's key role in providing Cannon Road
right4-way u part of the Team Cllifomia ert, and in consideration of the recently
proposed Cannon Road West Fee Program A copy of our letter to the &&ant City Engineer -rasing our concerns over the Feo Prom is attached.
ENGINEERING REPORT FOR PROPOSED CANNON ROAD WEST
FACILITY FEE
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to define the project, estimate the cost of improvement, determine a reasonable area of benefit, and establish a fair method of allocating cost for the construction 9f Cannon Road from Paseo del Norte to El Camino Real (referred
to The report identifies the properties which have a responsibility as well as a general benefit from the construction of Cannon Road West and spreads the cost to improve this section of roadway to undeveloped properties within an established benefit area based upon average daily traffic projections.
as Cannon Road West).
The report includes a project description, cost estimation for Cannon Road West, an identification of existing funding sources, a description of the area of benefit, an estimate of traffic to be generated from future developments within the benefit area,
a description of the fee calculation methodology and a recommended fee structure.
The project consists of the completion of Cannon Road to major arterial standards
from Paseo del None to El Camino Real, also known as Cannon Road West. The improvements proposed for inclusion in the fee program include all curbs, gutters, sidewalk, base and .pavement, median landscaping and irrigation, median hardscape, streetlights, street monumentation, grading and excavation, storm drainage facilities, guardrails and other incidentals necessary to complete a four-lane major arterial
roadway.
The project also includes two (2) 485-foot multi-span bridge structures across the saltwater wetlands at the north end of Macario Canyon and a 156-foot single-span bridge across the Agua Hedionda Creek at El Camino Real. In addition, the project
includes the cost for full mitigation of the environmental impacts of the construction
of the improvements noted above.
The project does not include any utility, water, or sewer improvement costs. These
costs are included within other fee programs or are assumed to be the responsibility of adjacent developing projects which require the need for the facility.
Cost estimates were prepared for the project improvements using the latest plan revisions for Cannon Road West. The cost estimates prepared by Crosby, Mead,
Benton and Associates as included within the Cannon Road Assessment District
1 1 1/4/94
Engineer's Report prepared by NBS/Loww in November of 1989, were used as a
source for the bridge construction cost estimation.
The items evaluated in the cost estimate were limited to the surface improvements which included grading, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, median curbs, median landscaping, storm drains, street lights and erosion control. In order to evaluate the
difference between shared center lane costs and those frontage improvements which would normally be required of the adjacent development projects, the cost estimates were further divided relative to inside and outside lane requirements. The "shared inside lanes" also called the "common improvements" consist of full road bed grading, two (2) 18-foot paved sections divided by a raised unimproved median. Only the drainage improvements necessary to serve the center lanes and to protect the roadway grading were included in the "common improvement" cost estimate (ie.
drainage improvements serving the frontage go with the frontage improvements).
For the purpose of project funding, the cost of the frontage improvements along properties which have a general plan designation of Open Space and which are
environmentally constrained are included in the shared project costs and not listed as frontage obligation to the adjoining property owner.
The cost estimate was divided into seven (7) segments or reaches for the purpose of allocating improvement costs. Table A summarizes the engineer's estimates for the "common", frontage and total combined improvement costs for the seven segments. Detailed cost estimates are included as Appendix A of this report. (Note: segments 1A thru 1F coorespond to the former Reach 1 of Cannon Road)
The total estimated cost for Cannon Road West is $1 1,778,819.
TABLE A
Allow
Totd Coat Common Front=
?A Paseo 0.I Nona to Cu County Oriw $05,250 80 $05,250
Staaon 7 + 38 to 18 + 77.98
Staaon 18+77.91 to 37+70
staaon 37+m to w+oo
3Mocr#)+00tos4+60
18 Cu Country Or to Annda Or 81,520,721 $1.060.31 2 8400.40S
1c Amd. Or to Cwhbd Rwk Boundwy $477,397 $24S,507 8 227,030
to crlrbd RmoA burdwy to M.cMo 8dg. $1,475,758 $1 .47S5,7U 80
84,602,200 84, 002.200 $0
1F M.cwr0 &id- to K.llv Ranah Bound~y 8384,088 8384,088 80
2 KW R.nch Boundwy to a cbna Rad 83,246.808 82.030.37 1 81 ,Zl OMS
Station 09+38 to 72+81.30
$1 1,77831s 80,802,834 81,975.384
2 1 1/4/94
w
CANNON ROAD WEST
COST ALLOCATION
There are presently two (2) funding sources identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program for the construction of Cannon Road West. The two sources
are identified as follows:
rn TransNet Highway Funds- Cannon Road West is designated on the Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) as a regional facility and was allocated $3,450,000 in Transnet funds. The Transnet funds are limited to funding one-half of the construction costs of a basic four lane facility excluding
outside curb and gutter, sidewalks, streetlights, median landscape and median hardscape improvements. The detailed cost estimates presented in Appendix A include a column entitled "SANDAG Allowable" which summarizes the
facility costs eligible for Transnet funding.
Community Facilities District (CFD) R1 Funds- The list of improvements to be
funded by CFD #1 includes provision for $3,950,000 to be applied towards the construction of Cannon Road West.
rn
The following table shows how the costs for Cannon Road West are allocated among
the various funding sources:
cost SANDAG Frontago Feo Estimate Transnot CFD I1 Obligations Program
$1 1,778,819 $3,450,000 $3,950,000 $1,975,984 $2,402,835
4 1 1/4/94
The area of benefit for the proposed Cannon Road West Facility Fee is shown on Figure 2 bordered by a heavy solid line. The area includes portions of Local Facility Management Zones 5, 8, 13 and 24. With one.exception, each of the properties within the proposed benefit area is obligated by virtue of a condition of development approval or Local Facility Management Plan (LFMP) requirement to finance all or some portion of Cannon Road between Paseo Del None and El Camino Real. The relationship between developing properties within the area of benefit and the need to construct Cannon Road is discussed in more detail on a zone by zone basis in the following
paragraphs.
There are twenty parcels under two separate ownerships in LFMP Zone 5 that are included within the proposed area of benefit. The 18 parcels under the ownership of Upland Industries are fully developed parcels created with Phase
V of the Carlsbad Research Center (CRC). These 18 parcels are subject to a tentative map condition of approval which requires construction of a secondary access prior to issuance of building permits on any of the parcels. Secondary
access would occur with the extension of Faraday Avenue to Cannon Road and Cannon Road east to El Camino Real or west to the existing terminus of Cannon
Road. Interim secondary access may be allowed by the City from Halley Way to Camino Hills Drive; however, City approval of the interim secondary access is conditioned upon the owner's participation in the financing of Cannon Road.
The remaining two parcels under the ownership of the lvar Company are undeveloped and do not have any development approvals pending or otherwise.
However, access to the lvar property must occur through Phase V of CRC and therefore, any development of the property would be subject to the same
requirement for secondary access as was applied to the CRC properties. For this reason, the two lvar properties are included within the proposed area of
benefit for the Cannon Road West Facility Fee.
There are two parcels under two separate ownerships in LFMP Zone 8 that are included within the proposed area of benefit. All properties within LFMP Zone 8 are subject to a LFMP requirement to guarantee funding of Cannon Road from El Camino Real to Car Country Drive prior to development of the property.
LFMP Zone 8 properties which have been excluded from the area of benefit include City owned property in Macario Canyon and privately owned property
located along the north shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The property
within Zone 8 located on the north shore of the Lagoon will access the freeway and other regional routes by way of Park Drive and Tamarack Avenue and thus were not included in the proposed facility fee program.
There are twelve parcels under four separate ownerships in LFMP Zone 13 that
5 1 1 /4/94
are included in the proposed area of benefit. Each of these parcels is subject to a LFMP requirement to financially participate in the funding of all or some
portion of Cannon Road West. Three parcels in LFMP Zone 13 located along Paseo Del Norte are not within the area of benefit and would not be subject to
the Cannon Road West Facility Fee. The three excluded parcels are considered to have responsibility for Palomar Airport Road and are included in the existing
Assessment District (AD) No. 86- 1 for the construction of Palomar Airport Road from Paseo Del Norte to Palomar Oaks Way.
Three other parcels within LFMP Zone 13, identified as parcels 31, 32 and 34 on the Area of Benefit Map, are also included within the boundaries of AD No. 86-1 and thus, subject to the assessment for the construction of Palomar
Airport Road. Recent mapping efforts revised and extended the boundary line of the original parcels to include property that was formerly north of the original assessment district boundary. It is proposed that an area equal to the original amount of area included within AD No. 86-1 be excluded from the
proposed Cannon Road West Facility Fee program. This area of exclusion is identified by hatch marks on the Area of Benefit Map on Figure 2. .
The value of the current PAR assessment for the excluded areas when
compared on an ADT basis is approximately $100/ADT or twice what is proposed for the Cannon Road Facility Fee. The remainder of parcels 31, 32 and 34 lying north of the excluded area are included with the area of benefit and their potential traffic impact has been incorporated within the fee
calculation for the Cannon Road West Facility Fee. It is anticipated that minor adjustment to the exclusion boundary will be necessary in the future to make
the area of benefit coincide with future parcel boundaries.
.
There are fourteen parcels under seven separate ownerships in LFMP Zone 24 that are included in the proposed area of benefit. The existing mobile home park within Zone 24 is not included within the area of benefit. The approved Zone
24 LFMP requires that a financing plan guaranteeing the construction of Cannon Road from El Camino Real to Car Country Drive be approved by the City prior
to any development occurring within the zone. This requirement was placed on
development within Zone 24 because the traffic on Cannon Road West generated by the development of Zone 24 is projected to exceed the Growth Management threshold requiring implementation of a financing plan requiring construction of the facility.
6 1 1/4/94
AREA OF BENEFIT FOR PROPOSED
CANNON ROAD WEST FAClLrPl FEE
n
The approved LFMP Zone plans, proposed and approved tentative maps and recorded final maps, were utilized to determine the projected land uses and development potential of each parcel included within the area of benefit. Projected Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) totals were then estimated using traffic generation rates obtained from the October 1993 edition of the SANDAG Trip Generation Table (included in Appendix 8). The ADT projections for each parcel are listed within Table 6 of this report.
The traffic projections listed on Table 6 are for future development only and do not include ADT figures for existing residences located on property within the proposed
area of benefit. Existing residences are exempt from the proposed fee program; however, any additional development in excess of the existing units on such a property is subject to the Facility Fee. There are presently three existing units within the proposed area of benefit, two in LFMP Zone 24 and one in LFMP Zone 8.
The Cannon Road West Facility Fee is calculated by dividing the total unfunded costs for Cannon Road West by the total number of average daily trips anticipated to be generated by the undeveloped propem within the established area of benefit. The
unfunded costs were determined by totaling the Cannon Road West costs and subtracting out the SANDAG Transnet contribution, the Community Facilities District No. 1 contribution and the future frontage obligations of the adjoining property
owners.
As shown below, the total unfunded cost of Cannon Road West which is to be generated through the collection of benefit area fees is $2,402,835.
Total Facility Cost SI 1,778,819
Less Frontage Obligations 1.975.984
Less SANDAG Transnet Funds 3,450,000
Less CFD #l Funds 3,950,000
Total Unfunded Cost $2,402,835
The total number of Average Daily Trips (ADT's) expected to be generated by the
undeveloped property within the benefit area subtotaled by Local Facility Management
(LFMP) zone is 48,642 trips.
5 4,718 0 7,788 13 33,051
24 3.008
Total 48,565
0 1 1/4/94
The Benefit Ares Fee calculated by dividing the unfunded costs by the total ADT is
$ SO/ADT.
Benefit Area Fee $2.402.835 = 45OtADT 48,565 ADT
The actual fee for a developing property within the Benefit Area is calculated by multiplying the benefit area fee of SSO/ADT by the total ADT generated by the
proposed development.
Table B shows the development potential, general plan land use, estimated ADT, proposed benefit area fee, and frontage obligations for each of the parcels included within the established area of benefit. It should be noted that the fees listed in Table
A are estimates based upon existing proposed land uses and growth management projections. The actual fee will be determined at time of development based upon the
approved land use and the trip generation rates projected at the time building permits are issued.
It is proposed that the fee charged per ADT will be adjusted annually based upon the incremental increase in the Engineering News Record, Los Angeles Construction Cost Index.
9 1 ll4t94
TABLE B
ZoOe S
1 2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11 12
13 14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
ann8
21 22
Zoao 13
23
24 2s
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 33
34
zooau 3s
36
37 38
39
40
41
42 43
44
4s
44 47
48
Told
212- W- 17 212- W- 18
212-130-19
212-W-20 212-W-21 212- uo-22
212-uo-23 212- 130-24
212- 130-u 212- W-26
212- W-27 212- W-28
212- W-29 212-W-30
212- W-31
212- W-32
212- W-33
212-W-34
212-00-41 212 - WO- 43
subcoul
m-aO-2a 212-010-03
SUblOUl
212-010-14
211 -010- 19 211-010-23
211-010-as
21 1-010-24 211-a-01
211 -a-03 211-a-01
211-m-06 211-m-as
211 -m-m
211-au-06
Subtoul
212-a- I3
212-00-38
212-80-3) 212-00-s
212-0-n
212-00-33
212-00-32 212-060-40
212-060-29
212-060-30 212-060-34
212-0-zz 212-mO-3S --a- 17
SUbU
253 21 1.92 13
130 13
1.79 13
293 fl
2.08 1.4
2.44 1.7
6.19 2.7
8.16 33
269 1.1 239 1.1
224 1.1
7.24 3.4
8.00 4.1
639 43 4.10 33
1.83 0.7
14.28 5.7
63.78
2.22 la
296 oa
333.93 146.0
21.90 110
3ss.83
S630 0.0
3.00 0.0
147.01 ao 1.40 ao
49.9s 0.0
47.18 10.9 10.06 10.1
27.9s 73
149.14 U.4
1200 lu)
71.96 66.7
7.10 7.7
sm 0
129 Ll
L12 I3
120 l2
1.39 1.4 932 9.4
064 a7
14.42 13.7 %a 1w
-01)
4837 01)
134 a0
1.09 od 242 24
16634
118963
PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI PI
PI
RM/III RL
os as as os
lll UA
o/PI WPl OIPI**
o/PIa* om UA
RLM RIA RIA RIA RUI RUI RLM RUI RIM RUI RIA RIA RIA RM
\
270 1S7
12s 1S7
220 188
146 178
282 M
34s
11s 11s
11s
3ss
429
345 76
S%
410
f109n
%a3
n641 $1097
s9.ro9 $7,318
S14.113
$1730 u.750 u.79.l
U.7SO $17.72
$21.432 sz3322
11730
D&16
kL9.%S
t7mi
nm
14.m
so so so so so so so so so so so so
$0 so so so so so so
fo
4718 S23S90) so
7678 Kelly S3639p $1316,493
110 Kir* urn so
nsa S389AP S1316.49S
0
0 0
0
1u44 loo0
2#r) 1w13
784
4744 IUS Mu)
$0
$0 $412370 so so s2333os so so so so so
S1139U
33OS1 Slmw s7S9.48D
IS7 3s
42 38
4s 301
10 2m
1- a
a
to
130
so $0
so
so so so
$0 so
$0 $0 to
$0
so
so
APPENDIX A
11/4/94
Caoroa Rod - Pueo Dei Nom to Car Couatry Drive
Statio0 7+38.07 to 18+77.95 (Reach 1A)
41
Cmnoo Rod - Cu Country Dr to Armada Dr
Statio. 18+77.9J to 37+70 (Rcoeh 16)
1
14
239300
14
2301 uoo
71012
0
0
3604
0
0
3 0 3
2M
0
0
0 360 8 rw 0
1 0
3
34
1040
[s
CY
Arrsr
TOO
TOa
SF LF
SF
LF
SF SF EA EA M LE EA u: IE LF W LF EA EA M M
cy IE
Ul000
lSOO.00
230
7%
28.00
930
0.12
9.00
Z00
6.00
2.80
zu) 3S0.00 2m.m
lSa00
2700.00
1ZOO
U
4a so
80
2700 ua,
3oMQ) ua,
6s
10
ais
wooo
$21000
$598uD SlOlOO
$64.426
s23.7u) $8321 to sa
$21424 sa to Sllw to
WO w
Y)
Y)
317280
s400 Sa- to
52300 to
$2210
SlW
$0
nm
1
0
0
0
1J33
1664 47300
3484
0
toPo?
s3m
0 1 5
7166 6
uloo
88
443
S76 197
'3
0 8
0
0
0
iwo
1JMNO
250
1SO
930
0.12 9.00
200
6.00
2.80 uo
3U)M) 2som
18O.00
2fMM
ltD0
U
48 30 80 m
2sm
Wr)
6s
10
imm
am
ais
morn
udm 521m uQdm
$10300
f1073R
$39358
$14.197 U3.1J6
so
t2ld24
$0
$0 SlMO so
$1.440
Sl.ll3 sa
$0 urn t5113U t19300 t23960 SB.100
tzjoo swm
f7300 52310
$10.00
A
Cam808 Rod - Armada Dr to C.rlrbd Ranch Boumduy
Statio. 37+70 to JO+OO (Reuk 1C)
Cunon Rod - Cul8b.d Ruth B0und.q io Muurio Bridp
Statio. JO+OO to 64+SO (Raub 1D)
Qruocicy Unit UnitCac Amoum
1s okru
OCY
0-
117s Too 127s Ta
362s SP
2900 w
14SW SP ow 190 SP
Moos?
1m IE OEA
SEA samw
SEA
2OoOuI ow ow om om OEA om
OCY ow
loo00
1SW.W
230
7%
28.00 930
0.12
9.00
2.00
6.00 2.80 m 2S.W 3so.m
1- als m#m
lur)
44
48
27w
2m 300400
2m
65
10
I-
f1OM)I) Lo Lo to
UL900
$12.113 w3m
t36.100
S29bMo so
u3340 S14M)O
s37500
$900 so
sm
ti3m sz4m so so so so so so
Lo so
P
Cumom Rod - Muurio Brid#e
Statio. 64+SO to 69+3S (Resch 1E)
Cannon Rod - Marario Bridge lo Kelly Ranch Boundaq Station 69+3S to 72+61.30 (Reach 1F)
P
Canon Rod - Kelly Ranch Boundary to El Camino Real
Station 72+61.3 to 124+SO (Reach 2)
1
61310
6300
6833
184BaD 0
0
9978
0
0 9
0
0 8
ulo
0
0
740 5460
268
333
3 13
0
2
2
5
2 20
Ls
CY T-
Ton SF 1E
SF u: SF SF EA
Lp EA FA W EA
Lp SP SF W W W
Lp EA EA EA EA CY
4olm uo 28.00
93 0.12
9.00
200
6M)
ZSO 2s 3mM) Urn mM) 180.00
0.1s m#oo
1200
US
75.00
44
48
6s
2100
U00
3oO0.00
twr)
6s
m
uom
S176,raD
$64914
$22,416 so so
u9gss so so
t3m so so
$1.40 fbo
10
10 Slan uopm $11,792
SlS984 tlo3u
w.40 um s1sm um stloo
sis3m
so
1
0
1J33
1664
13ooo
10178
So890
0
6Qzu
19320
0
4913
4
21 20000
21
8Ooo
1130 78m
110
0
775
110
4
0
4
4
40
S&XXl w 28.00
930 0.12
9.00 200
6.00
180 uo 350.00 Urn wxao
lsa00
mrtoo
l2.m
23s 75.00
44
48
6s
80
27W
wx)
3Qoaoo 25m
65
ais
APPENDIX B
1 1 /4/94
(NOT SO1
BRIEF GUIDE Of VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATE8
FOR THE SAN DIE430 REGION
10 8
12.8 7s it81
16. 16.61
3S
10S
48 48
n n
n
78 IS
48
2.8
n 1t-u 8. 1
8.2
3.8
60/ 1 wo n h' ew/aoB' 28
38
-. .
48
lo. 11:61
11. 1l:SI
n
n
as
4s
n 1s
4s 78
28 n
108 128 208 14s 28s in
48 6.
5. 4s
n
ea 78
1- 11s 148 20. 168 n in
43
8.8 Y .o 48 S.0 3.4 1.7
3.4 n (481 lo. iL0 13s it81 n 1 68
8. J im mn 78 140
8.0
11 7
u*ouu ..- - --._.._________ .- [U:U: 1 tl - ......................... --...___ [60:30:41
Mol.( 1-t- -
Mou n.- OW
YLnMV ........ (0tl0ll
omtl SI- CommucUrOma ........ -- .............................. (77.18:Y II.II~W ioo.000 w hi Lug.IHlgMiwlCMvnrcu~ ............................ (01.15.3)
CorDa.l.Oma trngu lrnanll
-1 Icm C.nlr) .......... -1- ......................... IWW. 101
cmuumu* Qur Cuywww im InuI* MI..-
MI& Orom UM onw
(mor. man 100.ooQ IC). h.. 8* II~IYI)
-1 we.
I-/- -a w
O.OMmal1 o( Mom v.Ky Maa .......................................... [WQ:3&10I
CUU .. ... [00:1~01
2.
8.
S.
9.
n
14.
1%
15% Bs
6% 8. I.
78 88 8.
4.
n 4s 0s 3.
4. 5.
0.n
n
n
n
n n
3.
1.
4.
n
n
n
14s 1 4.
11. (481 n n iW1
n 1731
ia
78
11 a
I8
100
a0
a.4
54
0.3
a. i
78
47
lo. zo. 101
A-6 SEWER
APPENDIX A-6
SEWER COST ESTIMATES
Item No.
1
ZONE 13
MAJOR SEWER FACILITIES
I tern Estimated Unit Unit Price Total Cost
Description Quantity
10" PVC 2,000.00 LF $85.00 $1 70,000.00
SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA BASIN'
Subtotal $1 70,000.00
Contingencies at 15%
Subtotal
Engineering and Administration at 20%
Total Construction Cost
'Source:"Master Plan of Sewerage" Dated January, 1992
$2 5,500.00
$1 95,500.00
$39,100.00
$234,600.00
A-7 WATER
APPENDIX A-7
WATER COST ESTIMATES
Item I Estimated I Unit I Unit Price
Description Quantity
~
Service Item
Area I No.
Total Cost
A I1
1
ZONE 13
MAJOR WATER FACILITIES
EA
8"
reclaimed
main
16" main
12" main I 2,700 I LF I $36 I $97,200 I
3,750 LF $27 $101,250
2,250 LF $50 $1 12,500
Pressure
reducing
station
10" main
12" main
8" main
1,500 LF $32 $48,000
2,100 LF $36 $75,600
2,100 LF $27 $56,700
$75,000
B 1 16" main 3,600 LF $50 $1 80,000
2 16" main 2,900 LF $50 $1 45,000
8" main 7,050 LF $27 $1 90,350
B Subtotal $51 5,350
Total $1,08 1,600
__~ ~
A Subtotal I $566,250 I
A-8 PROPERTY OWNERS
Owner
Winter, Ra R. 21 1-010-05
21 1-010-19
SDGE 21 1-010-23
10s-1 5.95 1.22 1 os-2 3.36 3.1 5
SDGE (1) 21 1-01 0-24
21 1-022-01
General Plan Gross Acreage os- 1 1.40
os-1 3.00 os- 1 147.04
Net Acreage
1.40
2.26
76.1 3 . -. . -
TR- 1 I 44.00 I 33.95 I
CRC
CRC
CRC
CRC - -
NAMM
CRC
OS-3 31.91 29.39
2 1 1-022-02 OS-3 3.55 3.13
21 1-022-03 R 10.70 10.70
21 1-022-07 O/PI-2 4.25 4.25
21 1-022-08 OIPI-2 4.85 4.85
21 1-022-09 O/PI-2 3.95 3.95
21 1-022-10 lO/PI-2 8.16 5.02
CRC
CRC
CRC
21 1-022-1 1
21 1-022-12
21 1-022-1 3
-
TR-3
TR-3
TR/C I 12.20 I 10.15 TR-3 95.36 I 90.1 2
1.44 1.44
8.46 6.47
17.30 7.50 I 17m30 7.50 I OIPI-2
OS-4
TR-2
O/PI-1
9.12 9.1 2
10.91 10.91 CRC
CRC
21 1-023-01
2 1 1 -023-02
os-2
R
os-2
36.27 33.54
16.00 16.00
6.60 6.60
This information is a different level of detail than found on the
constraints analysis or the tentative maps associated with
SP 207 (A), therefore acreage totals will not match.
GIA
GIA CRC
CRC
SDGE = San Diego Gas and Electric
CRC = Carlsbad Ranch Company
GIA = Gemological Institute of America
NAMM = National Association of Music Merchants
05-3 17.28 17.28
2 1 1-023-03 OIPI-1 10.06 10.06
2 1 1-023-04 O/PI-1 7.76 7.76
21 1-023-05 OS-4 5.72 5.72
O/PI-2 6.28 6.28
21 1-023-06 TR-3 5.53 5.53
TR-2 41.09 41.09
OS-4 15.28 15.28
(1) Because SDGE is not a part of SP 207 (A), this area's analysis
was not revised at this time. This area will be subject to further
analysis when SDGE submits improvement plans.
SDGE
Ecke, Paul Sr. TR
Appendix AS
OS-5 10.00 1.84
212-010-14 OS-1 56.50 23.27
212-041-05 TR-2 5.84 5.84 I TR-3 14.82 I 13.01 I