HomeMy WebLinkAbout1014 TULIP WAY; ; CB052057; Permit01-05-2006
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Residential Permit Permit No CB052057
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address
Permit Type
Parcel No
Valuation
Occupancy Group
# Dwelling Units
Bedrooms
Project Title
Applicant
PERRY BILL
1014 TULIP WYCBAD
RESDNTL
2144101200
$283,250 00
0
0
BAUM RESIDENCE-ADD 2101 SF 2ND
Sub Type
Lot#
Construction Type
Reference #
Structure Type
Bathrooms
RAD
0
NEW
Status
Applied
Entered By
Plan Approved
Issued
Inspect Area
Ong PC#
ISSUED
06/02/2005
MDP
01/05/2006
01/05/2006
STORY.ADD 3RD CAR GAR, REMODEL 1 738 1 ST FLOOR Plan Check*
Owner
BAUM RAYMOND C
550 2ND STREET
ENCINITAS 920254
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Building Permit
Add'l Building Permit Fee
Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park in Lieu Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
Other Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot Water Con Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot Water Con Fee
Reel Water Con Fee
$1,11328 Meter Size
$0 00 Add'l Reel Water Con Fee
$723 63 Meter Fee
$0 00 SDCWA Fee
$0 00 CFD Payoff Fee
$2833 PFF (3105540)
$0 00 PFF (4305540)
$0 00 License Tax (3104193)
$0 00 License Tax (4304193)
$0 00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541)
$0 00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541)
$0 00 Sidewalk Fee
$0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL
$0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL
$0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL
$0 00 Housing Impact Fee
$0 00 Housing InLieu Fee
Housing Credit Fee
$0 00 Master Drainage Fee
$0 00 Sewer Fee
Additional Fees
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$15300
$4500
$6950
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$000
$2,13274
Total Fees $2,132 74 Total Payments To Date $2,13274 Balance Due $000
BUILDING PLANS
_/_ IN STORAGE
ATTACHED
Inspector v_/ f *
FINAL-A
Date 5/
/PR
b(
AVAL
JL r.|paran^p
NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition* of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired
PRMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008
1;s!l!" PROJECT INFORMATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO
EST
Plan Ck Deposit
Validated By
Date
'(
Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units
Assessor s Parcel #Existing Use 02
£ie«?
Description g.f J/Vork
L I .'„ .*e9w60NTACT1PERSON (if :diffe'rent from applicant)
SQ FT #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms
•Z-:
Name Address
3 ;rt';APPLICANT :J;n Contractor Q Agent for Contractor *E3 Owner L^Agent for OwnerL^Age
City StateTZip Telephone #Fax #
Name
5 fCONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME
(Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Cd3J—'fihySierty or CotirHy whicl^ requires b permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement ihat he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law
(Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code! or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged
exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars I$500J)
Name
State License #
Address
License Class
City State/Zip
City Business License #
Telephone #
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License #
6 ;WQRkERSi COMPENSATION '.' . tfB' ... ,„:„; ""'];.
Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations
0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued
Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are
Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California
WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100 000), in addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney s fees
SIGNATURE DATE
7:» OWNER-BUILDER^DECLARATION "*!'•
1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason
Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale)
J3, I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The
Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law)
l~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason
1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement l~l YES 0JJO
2 /TThav^/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work
3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number)
4 I plan to provide portions of the work/ biffff have hired^the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number) ftp " -'•-- - -. .
5 I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work)
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY ; S V =
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? O YES d NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES Q NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES D NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
8 ^CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY fp ' -
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code)
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
SX APPLICANT? CERTIFICATION """:>i ••••*;': ^o.: .^ [„,„;,.. '""'" '\ ::"
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES
JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT
OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5 0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void it the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of suchirjgrmrt-qr if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is commenced for a perjod^sPlSO days (Section lOjj^HTUniforfFi'Building Code)
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE s^^^-^^&Z—S <(=>^-i_ DATE £>' 1-~ <$ ^
WHITE File YELLOW Apifncant PINK Finance
PERMIT APPLICATION
.CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008
PfMJJECT iNFORMATION ' .A"' : ..'/"' !<^"
l£ U
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO Ct&S 2
EST VAL
Plan Ck Deposit
Validated By
Date
Address (include Bldg/Suiti tt)Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total tt of units
Assessor s Parcel tt Existing Use Proposed Use
Description of Work
^.s^Mo^M
j2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant)
SQ FT #of Stones # of Bedrooms tt of Bathrooms
Name AddressAddress
rtractor Dilialnt^rS^rttractor QSOwner
City
| Agent hf or Owner !]„
State/Zip Telephone tt Fax tt
Name
:4:v!::° PROPERTY OWNER
Address City State/Zip Telephone #
Address City State/Zip Telephone ttName
5 '^P|WIACTOR:-COMPANY NAME f ""'#• '"•'." -lifc- Ti° ,u'•.-•••. ''JftP
(Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exejnption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civjj/jsenalty of not men? thap-five hjyidred/dolla/sj$500]],
Name
State License tt
Address
License Class
City State/Zip
City Business License tt
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License tt _
6- ";." WORKERS'' COMPENSAf ION ™V O'..; "• ...... ife' " iSltr ' : • '" "MtS^-^ •
Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations
O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued
Of I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are
Insurance Policy K Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California
WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollarsJ^OO.OOO) J^addftion/tojthe y&\ of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney s fees
^^f^€^^^^l>f^^^ _ DATE ^-^^y^ ' ^
DECLARATIONIS : : C \ .' •'' S;-io '"''. '-"P " • I~' ' ' '•"'.' " '-.
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason
rj I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale)
n I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law)
l~l I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason
1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement d YES [JNO
2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work
3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number)
4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number) _
5 I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work) __
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
CQMPLEtlSr HIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY ' "S "H. '. ...
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? l~l YES l~l NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? fj YES Q NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? H] YES [j] NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 30970) Civil Code)
LENDER'S NAME _ LENDER'S ADDRESS
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT
OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code)
APPLICANT S SIGNATURE DATE
WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance
Inspection List
Permit* CB052057 Type RESDNTL RAD
Date Inspection Item
03/06/2009 89 Final Combo
03/06/2009 89
02/18/200989
02/18/200989
09/05/2008 19
09/05/2008 29
09/05/2008 39
09/05/2008 49
05/02/2008 68
04/29/2008 68
02/20/2008 17
02/20/2008 18
01/29/2008 16
01/23/2008 84
01/09/2008 84
01/07/2008 18
12/27/2007 13
12/11/2007 13
12/11/2007 15
12/11/200784
05/16/2007 11
05/09/2007 1 1
02/28/2007 98
02/13/2007 22
02/05/2007 22
02/05/2007 34
01/31/2007 21
01/31/2007 23
01/29/2007 22
01/26/2007 22
01/26/2007 22
01/26/2007 98
01/26/2007 98
01/17/2007 11
01/17/2007 12
01/16/2007 11
01/16/2007 12
05/18/200621
05/18/200624
05/17/2006 21
Final Combo
Final Combo
Final Combo
Final Structural
Final Plumbing
Final Electrical
Final Mechanical
Fireplace/Tie Straps
Fireplace/Tie Straps
Interior Lath/Drywall
Exterior Lath/Drywall
Insulation
Rough Combo
Rough Combo
Exterior Lath/Drywall
Shear Panels/HD's
Shear Panels/HD's
Roof/Reroof
Rough Combo
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
BMP Inspection
Sewer/Water Service
Sewer/Water Service
Rough Electric
Underground/Under Floor
Gas/Test/Repairs
Sewer/Water Service
Sewer/Water Service
Sewer/Water Service
BMP Inspection
BMP Inspection
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Steel/Bond Beam
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Steel/Bond Beam
Underground/Under Floor
Rough/Topout
Underground/Under Floor
Inspector Act
Rl
JM
-
JM
PC
PC
PC
PC
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
PC
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
DB
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
Fl
Rl
CO
NR
PA
PA
NR
AP
CO
AP
AP
AP
AP
CO
CA
AP
CO
AP
we
AP
CO
PI
AP
AP
we
we
AP
CA
AP
AP
CO
CO
PA
we
CO
CO
AP
we
CO
BAUM RESIDENCE-ADD 2101 SF 2ND
STORY,ADD 3RD CAR GAR.REMODEL 17
Comments
LIST ON SITE
GAS ONLY RELEASE GAS
METERS
&ELEC
2 FIREPLACE FRAMES
FIRESTOP & SHUT OFF VALVE
OK TO INSULATE
LIST ON SITE
GLEN
REAR ELEVATION SHEAR
OK TO COVER
CHANGES
OK TO POUR
STEEL / HDS / HARDY FRAME NOT PER
PLAN
SEE NOTICE IN FILE
WATER ONLY
removed filter backwash
METERS TO HOUSE
RAY
NOTIFIED
NOTIFIED
SEE FND PLAN
HOLD DOWNS MISSING @ ALL SHEAR
EXPOSE ALL WASTE & REMOVE FOAM
WRAP
05/17/2006 24 Rough/Topout JM WC
Friday, March 06, 2009 Page 1 of 1
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For 03/06/2009
Permit* CB052057
Title BAUM RESIDENCE-ADD 2101 SF 2ND
Description STORY.ADD 3RD CAR GAR.REMODEL 1738 1ST FLOOR
Inspector Assignment JM
Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD
Job Address 1014 TULIP WY
Suite Lot 0
Location
APPLICANT PERRY BILL
Owner BAUM RAYMOND C
Remarks
Phone 7605354659
Inspector
Total Time
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By GLEN
Entered By CHRISTINE
Act Comments
Comments/Notices/Holds
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
PCR06116 ISSUED BAUM RES-REV ERROR-IN REAR SET, EXTEND 2ND STORY IN 1-RONT TO LINE UP
PCR07040 ISSUED BAUM RESIDENCE, REVISE STRUCTURAL PAGES &CALCS
Inspection History
Date
02/18/2009
09/05/2008
09/05/2008
09/05/2008
09/05/2008
05/02/2008
04/29/2008
02/20/2008
02/20/2008
01/29/2008
01/23/2008
01/09/2008
Description
89 Final Combo
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
68 Fireplace/Tie Straps
68 Fireplace/Tie Straps
17 Interior Lath/Drywall
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
16 Insulation
84 Rough Combo
84 Rough Combo
Act
CO
NR
PA
PA
NR
AP
CO
AP
AP
AP
AP
CO
Insp
JM
PC
PC
PC
PC
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
Comments
LIST ON SITE
GAS ONLY RELEASE GAS & ELEC METERS
2 FIREPLACE FRAMES
FIRESTOP & SHUT OFF VALVE
OK TO INSULATE
LIST ON SITE
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For 09/05/2008
Permit* CB052057
Title BAUM RESIDENCE-ADD 2101 SF 2ND
Description STORY.ADD 3RD CAR GAR.REMODEL 1738 1ST FLOOR
Inspector Assignment JM
Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD
Job Address 1014 TULIP WY
Suite Lot 0
Location
APPLICANT PERRY BILL
Owner BAUM RAYMOND C
Remarks
Phone 7605354659
Inspector
Total Time
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By GLEN
Entered By KATHY
Act Comments
PA
Comments/Notices/Holds
Date
05/02/2008
04/29/2008
02/20/2008
02/20/2008
01/29/2008
01/23/2008
01/09/2008
01/07/2008
12/27/2007
12/11/2007
12/11/2007
12/11/2007
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
PCR06116 ISSUED BAUM RES-REV ERROR-IN REAR SET, EXTEND 2ND STORY IN I;RONTTO LINE UP
PCR07040 ISSUED 13AUM RESIDENCE, REVISE STRUCTURAL PAGES &CALCS
Inspection History
Description
68 Fireplace/Tie Straps
68 Fireplace/Tie Straps
17 Interior Lath/Drywall
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
16 Insulation
84 Rough Combo AP JM OK TO INSULATE
84 Rough Combo CO JM LIST ON SITE
GLEN18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
13 Shear Panels/HD's
13 Shear Panels/HD's
15 Roof/Reroof
84 Rough Combo
Act
AP
CO
AP
AP
AP
AP
CO
CA
AP
CO
AP
WC
Insp
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
JM
PC
JM
JM
JM
Comments
2 FIREPLACE FRAMES
FIRESTOP & SHUT OFF VALVE
REAR ELEVATION SHEAR CHANGES
OK TO COVER
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For 01/17/2007
Permit* CB052057
Title BAUM RESIDENCE-ADD 2101 SF 2ND
Description STORY,ADD 3RD CAR GAR.REMODEL 1738 1ST FLOOR
Inspector Assignment JM
Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD
Job Address 1014 TULIP WY
Suite Lot 0
Location
OWNER BAUM RAYMOND C
Owner BAUM RAYMOND C
Remarks
Phone 7605336797
Inspector
Total Time
CD Description
12 Steel/Bond Beam
Act Comment
Comments/Notices/Holds
Requested By RAY
Entered By CHRISTINE
Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC#
PCR06116 ISSUED BAUM RES-REV ERROR-IN REAR SET, EXTEND 2ND STORY IN I;RONT TO LINE UP
.Inspection History
Description Act Insp Comments
CO JM HOLD DOWNS MISSING @ ALL SHEAR
CO JM
AP JM
WC JM
CO JM EXPOSE ALL WASTE & REMOVE FOAM WRAP
WC JM
Date
01/16/2007 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
01/16/2007 12 Steel/Bond Beam
05/18/2006 21 Underground/Under Floor
05/18/2006 24 Rough/Topout
05/17/2006 21 Underground/Under Floor
05/17/2006 24 Rough/Topout
Jun 28 QGOB9i21pOPM HP LRSERJET FflX PP23
CERTI :IED INSPECTOR'S REPORT
I AM ML1'
SPECIAL
CATECO
'hORIZED TO PERFORM
NSPECTION IN TVE
*V CHECKED
D REINFORCED CONCRETE
n PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE
Q SE'NFORCsDA/IASONRY
C STRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY
n REINFCR;:^ C/PSUM
D CEE3 FOUNDATION
D SPRAY-AP°'JED FIRE-PROOFING
D OTHER
JOB ADDRESS
T fjlA
3UILOINC PERMIT NUMBER PLAN rILE NUMBER
PROJECT IIAME ARC-IITEC~
CONST*PE GRADE ETC!DE5.SCURC: C? VlFCS ENGiNE^
V,AT L (MIX OEISlCN SE-3AR GRADE i WELD ^CC =~C 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR
LA3 RECslVINC 4 TESTING CONTR MAT L SAMPLES
INSPECTION
DATE
G//t
( DETAILED LOCATION Oc ,VCRKINS?EC~ED TEST SAMPLEfTXKEN WCSK RE/ECTED ;O8 PROBLEMS PRCGSE53 SE,'/AS<£ ETC
| REPORT OF INCUDES 'NFCR.WJION A3OLjr - A/.1OLNTJ OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED "RLJCT CONNECTIONS
| WORK INSPECTED (WELDS MADE MT BOLTS TORQU6D) CHEC<SO ETC
<il-V i -i I u/iVE NS?ECT;2 T-F. C~< LISTS? ^3C' S
' COMPL £-" WITH THE APPROVED ?L-^.NS SP:C f C^T
E—iCNS OF THE BUILDING CC^E UNLESS CTK=
P O Box 535
Lakeside, CA 92040
Tel (619) 443-1506 Fax (619) 443-1566
CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S REPORT — p
1 AM AUTHORIZED TO PERFORM
SPECIAL INSPECTION IN THE
CATEGORY CHECKED
D REINFORCED CONCRETE
D PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE
D REINFORCED MASONRY
D STRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY
D REINFORCED GYPSUM
D DEEP FOUNDATION
D SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING
X. OTHER .S^V L
JOB ADDRESS
/g>/^ 72^
PROJECT NAME
CAAL1
BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER
ARCHITECT
f/''i^ffr{ r \ *~ -^s f -i^ *-
CONSTR MAT L (TYPE GRADE ETC )DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OF MFGR ENGINEER
DESCRIBE /WAT L (MIX DEISIGN RE BAR GRADE & MFGR WELD ROD ETC )GENERAL CONTRACTOR
CONTR DOING REPORTED WORK
LAB" RECEIVING & TESTING CONTR MAT L SAMPLES
INSPECTION
DATE
DETAILED LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED TEST SAMPLES TAKEN WORK REJECTED JOB PROBLEMS PROGRESS REMARKS ETC
REPORT OF INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED STRUCT CONNECTIONS
WORK INSPECTED (WELDS MADE M T BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED ETC
INSPECTORHEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED THE WORK LISTED ABOVE
AND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS
AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE UNLESS OTHER SIGNATURE .
A/rcc Mcvrcrt
Construction Inspections & Materials Testing Consulting
10444 Flanders Cove Ceil / Voice Matt (619) 261-0984
San Diego, CA. 92126 Fax (858) 893-3211
SPECIAL toBPEcrcNs UNLIMITEDINC.
Job Mo.ForW«*En*ie
REGISTERED INSPECTORS' DAILY REPORT f f
TYPE OF
NSPECT10N
RBQUftSD
•gf Reinforced Concrete
Tl Poet Tansiooed ConcreteP Reinforced Masonry
Structural Steal Assembly:
StopWaldhg
Fbfcf WtfclnQ
am
B
FlroProodng
j«*Add»-«»cvm^3/5/io
TypeofSlnietUfe Architect
4 ^o?: // ^/rMatmM Description f*p* flrKto. **«»)OixiJixmr
hspectorWNw.SwbOwtaBtor
INSPECTION SUMMARY— LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED,
-sx ere. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PUkCEDOKWOfX
I ) tOBNT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, STRUCT, (XMNSCTIONS{WeLDMAOeH.r.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPUANCE
(HEREBY CERTFYTHATIHAVEOBSERVEOTOTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AU. OF THE
ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OIHERWICe NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO
SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE
SPECIALTY CERT NO CITY/SAN OEGQf
HMEW TMEOUT CVUN06R5
In addtton, 2 hour«ho«MJpirtnlinunfat)Bfc etmMUr»f<
Appmvedby
*#&!%&!*•,•:...
Servin Engineering, Inc.
2382 Cam mo Vida Roble, Suite F
Carlsbad, CA 92011
(760)931-1792, Fax (760)931-1892
Email nservin(ftjservin-engiueering com
May 11,2007
Ray Baum
1014 Tuhp Street
Carlsbad, CA 92011
RE Foundation revisions to approved plans
Attached to this letter you will find two signed prints of the approved plans showing two revisions The first
revision consists of changing out a Hardy Frame at the proposed office from a HF 9x48 to a HF 9x24 1 1/8
The second change consists of a foundation modification at the proposed master bath This change consists
of having found a thick foundation system which is approximately 7 ft x 32" where a 32" x 32" x 18" footing
was proposed The change will be to tie to the existing foundation with dowels as already set at the site and
tied to the adjacent 12" x 18" x 32" pad
I hope this answers any concerns your inspector has on the issues He can call my office for any related
questions at his leisure
Sincerely yours,
NICK SERVIN, PE, Principal Engineer #33538
\\Servineng\data\john\D\Jobs\Bill Perry\Tuhp\FoundationRevl wpd
IndependentInspection
Special Inspection & NOT
Isaiah E Gruhler
(619) 203-7920
Project Name ,Q
Inspection Report
Project Address V(ZAM I v >V
Architect
Engineer
Page of
Contractor (xt\\ ^rvn C
Permit* _ CtS
File #
DSA#
Other
v Report #
^•G>>S-~
INSPECTION
Structural Steel
Masonry
Concrete
Fireproofing
'f Other 5J.00X6V
Other r ^
Other- ^ /
Other *>
Other
MATERIAL SAMPLING QTY
HS Bolts
Pnsms
Mortar/Grout
Cone Cylinders
Fireproof
Other
Other
Other
Other
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
HS Bolts
Cone PSI
Grout PSI
Mortar PSI
/ Steel Ju"W Kio(^
Elect /Wire
Fireproof
X Other e^^-r^-^-
Other ^.^2_ /-7~r2_
INSPECTION CHECKLIST
X Plans/Specs^/ ^^-7
A Clearances
X. Positions
^ Sizes
Laps
Consolidation
Torque Ft Lbs
Other
Other
i\/v.^r -P M( !/•
L^L
2- MM
i-r
fV tVx i
YG> DouwJs
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE All reported work unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans specifications and
applicable sections of the building codes This report covers the locations of the work mspjScted and does not constitute opinion or
project control
Inspector /IsaiafrE Gruhler cert SD#869
-\\1S3?
Date
! 5/ /S "Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 DayS
5 Time Stop. ....... 1 I'
Copies of report submitted to
IndependentInspection
Special Inspection & NOT
Isaiah E Gruhler
(619) 203-7920
Inspection Report
Project Name i U>i ,/3 ^'SV CL- -s
Protect Address \(2}l^-i "TV;>V> p VJiAr \oArchitect
Engineer ^^>f"^C \ — >\ n
Contractor C:Tl \e^\. C_r\ Vfb?r>o
Page l of ( Report # ^Y>^ (
Permit* Cx'K^fS Z-QZ^T- —TSL-
File#
DSA#
Other*%ss
"INSPECTION
/Structural Steel
Masonry
Concrete
Fireproofing
X Other f^^ty
Other ' 6
Other
Other
Other
MATERIAL SAMPLING QTY
HS Bolts
Pnsms
Mortar/Grout
Cone Cylinders
Fireproof
Other
Other
Other
Other
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
HS Bolts
Cone PSI
Grout PSI
Mortar PSI
Steel
Elect /Wire
Fireproof 1
V Other g" -^ % <2_
otner 6S<X >/c) *V S'
INSPECTION CHECKLIST
y Plans/Specs
\/ Clearances
\/ Positions
X Sizes
Laps
Consolidation
Torque Ft Lbs f?
Other
Other
IS" '/-I (nru
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE All reported work unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans specifications and
applicable sections of the building codes This report covers the locations of the work ins^ect^d and does not constitute opinion or
project control
Inspector^Isaiah E Gruhler Cert SD#869*Signature
•^
/Date'
_J_nsp Date ^ Day 1
j._Tjrne Stert_ { ^
LTimeStop.. | _X.t>c?
Copies of report submitted to
Day 3 Day 5
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for (BuiCding Safety
DATE December 8, 2005 a APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO O5-2057 SET VI
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
[XJ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
|~~| The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Aj Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Mr Bill Perry Telephone # In Person
Date contacted (by ) Fax #
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS Applicant to deliver to City
By Bill Elizarraras Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC LOG trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for <BwC(fing Safety
DATE November 1O, 20O5 a APPLICANT
ftl
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057 SET V
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Baum Residence Addition/ Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Bill Perry
550 2nd Street
Encmitas, Ca92024
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Bill Perry Telephone # 760 809 8810 or 760 931 1792
Date contacted, >J, \H\eS(by |<A ) Fax # ? 760 931 1892
Mail Telephone \J Fax t/ln Person
• REMARKS THIS TIME. ONLY THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS WERE SUBMITTED
By Bert Domingo FOR BRIAN ZUPIGER Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 11/3/O5
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 05-2057
November 1O, 2OO5
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 11/3/05
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057
SET IV
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
November 10, 2005
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfred
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
pnnts to
B To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes a No
Carlsbad O5-2O57
November 10, 2005
• PLANS
1 Please make ail corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways THERE ARE A LOT OF HAND WRITTEN INFORMATION IN
BALLPOINT INK ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS PLEASE MAKE THE CORRECTIONS ON THE
ORIGINAL TRACINGS AS REQUESTED BEFORE SOME OF THE HANDWRITTEN INK
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ AND MAY
CREATE MORE CONFUSION IN THE ALREADY CONFUSING CONSTRUCTION SITE.
ALSO. IN ORDER TO HAVE AN APPROVED PLANS TO BE ISSUED TO
PRINCIPALITIES UNIFORMfWITH THE SAME INFORMATION). PLEASE MAKE
CORRECTIONS ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AS REQUESTED BEFORE.
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-
2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete
3 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or
architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code) THIS
WILL BE CHECKED WHEN ALL THE ITEMS BELOW ARE MET.
4 Clearly show the existing versus the proposed on each sheet The foundation details are
for a new house Please incorporate details that show how the new construction will connect to the
existing construction THE RESPONSE WAS S-1 BUT THE SAME SHEET DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW
ANY OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
5 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a
format similar to that shown below UBC Section 106 3 2 PLEASE SHOW ON THE COVER
SHEET AS REQUESTED NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with UBC Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS YES PER APPROVING REPORT
Carlsbad O5-2O57
November 1O, 2005
7 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal
(trusses, etc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per UBC Sec
106342 NO RESPONSE
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or
engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a
notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that
they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building The
deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal
documents have been approved by the building official"
• FIRE PROTECTION
8 When the valuation of a room addition exceeds $1,000, show permanently wired smoke
detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction, except that smoke
detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered UBC Section
310912 IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A1 & 2 AS RESPONDED THIS TIMET THERE
IS NONE SHOWN ON THE 2ND FLOOR.
a) Inside each bedroom
b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms
c) On each story
d) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the
stair
e) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling
height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway
NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit UBC
Section 3109 1
• EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
9 Provide stairway and landing details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC
Sections 1003 3 3 _IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN AT THE STAIRS AS RESPONDED PLEASE
PROVIDE STAIRS'DETAIL.
a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less than 10
occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum
10 Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 509 1 IT SEEMS
NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED AGAIN. PLEASE SHOW DETAILS.
a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor openings
b) Shall be installed at balconies more than 30" above grade or floor below
c) Shall have a height of 36"
d) Shall have connection details adequate to resist the horizontal force prescribed in
UBC Table 16-B
e) Openings between railings shall be less than 4"
Carlsbad O5-2O57
November 1O, 2005
105 Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003 3382
a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at anv point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12
inches from where the treads are narrowest.
11 Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 1003 3 3 6 IT SEEMS NONE
SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED AGAIN, PLEASE SHOW DETAILS.
a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways having four or more stairs
b) Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one
handrail (if not open on both sides)
c) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be
continuous
d) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more
than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension Handrails projecting from walls shall
have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail
e) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends
f) Openings between railings shall be less than 4" The triangular openings formed
by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall be less than 6"
• GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
12 In addition to the information shown on the plans, specify in the following locations
should be of safety glazing material in accordance with UBC Section 2406 4 (see
exceptions) PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors
other than wardrobe doors See the Master bedroom IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON
SHEETS A2 AS RESPONDED
• ROOFING
13 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof and balcony materials, per
UBC Section 106 3 3 IT SEEMS ICBO WAS INDICATED ON THE SHEET A4 BUT
HARD TO READ.
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Material weight
c) Product name/number
d) ICBO approval number, or equal
15 Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a
minimum of % inch per foot for drainage UBC Section 1402 3 PLEASE SHOW THE
REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THE BALCONIES/DECK. PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
Carlsbad 05-2O57
November 1O, 2005
GARAGE AND CARPORTS
17 Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for
openings between garage and dwelling Section 302 4 THE RESPONSE WAS A1 BUT SEEMS NONE
SHOWN. PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
18 All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting
floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage THE RESPONSE
WAS A1 BUT SEEMS NONE SHQWN.side UBC Section 302 2
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
29 Provide calculations for mam vertical and horizontal framing member loads on the
footings UBC Section 106 3 3 Based on the response more corrections may follow
Drag collectors are required to transmit the tributary lateral load to the respective resisting elements
Please submit analysis Any recommendations should be detailed on the plans and cross referenced to the
framing plan PLEASE SEE LINES B, D, 2 , 3, ETC IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE DRAG
TRUSS SYSTEM ALONG LINE 4 WOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE RESISTING
ELEMENTS. AGAIN. PLEASE SEE LINES bT dT 2T 3. ETC.
ft PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAILS OF THE DRAG COLLECTORS TO THE RESPECTIVE
RESISTING ELEMENTS PLEASE SEE ITEM e) ABOVE.
h) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LATERAL FLOOR LOAD ABOVE THE OFFICE AND BEDROOM, TO
THE LEFT OF THE LIVING ROOM, WOULD BE SUPPORTED IN THE Y-Y DIRECTION THE
RESPONSE SEEMS THE DETAILS 19. 15 & 16/S5 BUT. THE SAME DETAILS
SEEMED NOT TO SHOW HOW THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WOULD BE
ACCOMPLISHED. MAY NEED A DRAG SYSTEM. PLEASE SUBMIT ANALYSIS.
I) IT SEEMS THAT THE RB2 DID NOT CONSIDER THE POINT LOAD FROM THE APEX OF THE
RR1 PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO REFLECT THE POINT LOAD.
k) PLEASE SHOW HOLDOWN DETAILS ON THE PLANS FOR THE SHEAR WALLS CONNECTION
AT THE FLOOR LEVEL PLEASE CROSS REFERENCE THE SAME ON THE FRAMING PLAN. THE
RESPONDED DETAIL C/S1 IS FOR THE FOUNDATION LEVEL. PLEASE SHOW
DETAIL FOR THE 2N" FLOOR
m) A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE.
• FRAMING
30. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss
identification numbers on the plans. Or submit a deferral.
32. Note on the plan that the structural consultant shall provide a letter of review for
the truss plans and calculations with their submittal.
Carlsbad O5-2O57
November 1O, 2O05
35. Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic
and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs. 22" x 30" may be used if the
equipment size allows. Or submit a deferral. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
THE NEW LOCATION OF THE FAU'S SHOULD BE ON AN 18" PLATFORM. WITH
BARRIER FROM WHEEL IMPACT.
• ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
51 Show on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art 210-52(a)
NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A1 AS RESPONDED.
52 For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at
grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling NEC Art 210-
52 (e) This receptacle must be GFCI protected NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A2 AS
RESPONDED.
53 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets in kitchens and dining areas of
dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12
inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24
inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space Island and
peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one
receptacle Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be
considered as separate counter top spaces NEC Art 210-52(c) THE RESPONSE
WAS HARD TO READ!!!!
54 Per NEC Art 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either
SEEMS NO RESPONSE
A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets
55 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom NEC Art
210-52(d) PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LAVATORIES
56. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways 10 feet or more in length shall
have at least one receptacle outlet. NEC Art. 210-52fh).
58. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the
plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art
MO-1
Carlsbad O5-2057
November 1O, 2OO5
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
64 Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy
standards. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE
EXISTING ENVELOPE SHOULD COMPLY ALSO TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
REFLECTED IN THE ANALYSIS. THIS INTENTIONS/INDICATIONS SHOULD BE
REFLECTED ON THE COVER SHEET. ALSO. PLEASE SEE ITEM 69 BELOW
65. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to be either imprinted on the
plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare
the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. THE INDEX SHOWS
THE TITLE 24 ON SHEET A-6 BUT NOT SUBMITTED.
66. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s)
and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower).
67. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council fNFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations."
• MISCELLANEOUS
68. Please reconcile the drawing index with the sheets of the plans.
69. Please complete the building data
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In tfartnersdip with government for (BuikCing Safety
DATE October 25, 2005 CLAPPUCPUCANT
RIS^
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057 SET IV
PROJECT ADDRESS- 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Baum Residence Addition/Remodel
I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
I | The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
• The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Bill Perry
550 2nd Street
Encmitas, Ca92024
I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
• Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted BiiyPerry Telephone # 760 809 8810 or 760 931 1 792
Date contacted jt)fefo^(by t/V ) Fax# ? 760 931 1892
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
• REMARKS AGAIN THE RESUBMITTED PACKAGE(SLIP SHEETED) DID NOT SEEM TO
HAVE INCLUDED A RESPONSE FOR EACH ITEM OF THE PREVIOUS
CORRECTION(EXCEPT THE STRUCTURAL, PLEASE SEE THE CORRECTIONS BELOW)
DESPITE OF HAVING NO RESPONSE SUBMITTED, A CURSORY REVIEW ON THE PLANS
WERE MADE ANYWAY BUT, SEEMS NO APPRECIABLE CHANGE ON THE PLANS TO
REFLECT ANY EFFORT THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO COMMUNICATE IN ORDER TO ATTAIN THE ULTIMATE GOAL
OF THE 97 UBC IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH AND TO
FACILITATE THE PERMIT PROCESS, PLEASE EXERT MORE EFFORT TO ATTAIN THE
END WE CAN NOT CHECK THE PLANS WITHOUT PROVIDING US THE REQUESTED
INFORMATION AS EMBODIED IN THE CORRECTION LIST BELOW. PLEASE SEE ITEM 1
By Bert Domingo FOR BRIAN ZUPIGER Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/17/05
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92 123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 05-2O57
October 25, 2O05
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS 1O14 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 10/17/05
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2O57
SET IV
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
October 25, 2O05
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to
B To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes a NO
Carlsbad O5-2O57
October 25, 2005
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways THERE ARE A LOT OF HAND WRITTEN INFORMATION IN
BALLPOINT INK ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS PLEASE MAKE THE CORRECTIONS ON THE
ORIGINAL TRACINGS AS REQUESTED BEFORE SOME OF THE HANDWRITTEN INK
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ AND MAY
CREATE MORE CONFUSION IN THE ALREADY CONFUSING CONSTRUCTION SITE.
ALSO. IN ORDER TO HAVE AN APPROVED PLANS TO BE ISSUED TO
PRINCIPALITIES UNIFORMfWITH THE SAME INFORMATION!. PLEASE MAKE
CORRECTIONS ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AS REQUESTED BEFORE.
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-
2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engmeenng and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE. Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete
3 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or
architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code) THIS
WILL BE CHECKED WHEN ALL THE ITEMS BELOW ARE MET.
4 Clearly show the existing versus the proposed on each sheet The foundation details are
for a new house Please incorporate details that show how the new construction will connect to the
existing construction THE RESPONSE WAS S-1 BUT THE SAME SHEET DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW
ANY OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
5 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a
format similar to that shown below UBC Section 106 3 2 PLEASE SHOW ON THE COVER
SHEET AS REQUESTED NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with UBC Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS YES PER APPROVING REPORT
Carlsbad 05-2057
October 25, 2005
7. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal
(trusses, etc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per UBC Sec
106342 NO RESPONSE
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or
engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a
notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that
they have been found to be in genera) conformance with the design of the building The
deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal
documents have been approved by the building official"
• FIRE PROTECTION
8 When the valuation of a room addition exceeds $1,000, show permanently wired smoke
detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction, except that smoke
detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered UBC Section
310912 IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A1 & 2 AS RESPONDED THIS TIME. THERE
IS NONE SHOWN ON THE 2NP FLOOR.
a) Inside each bedroom
b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms
c) On each story
d) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the
stair
e) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling
height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway
NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit UBC
Section 3109 1
• EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
9 Provide stairway and landing details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC
Sections 1003 3 3 _IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN AT THE STAIRS AS RESPONDED PLEASE
PROVIDE STAIRS'DETAIL.
a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less than 10
occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum
10 Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 509 1 IT SEEMS
NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED AGAIN. PLEASE SHOW DETAILS.
a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor openings
b) Shall be installed at balconies more than 30" above grade or floor below
c) Shall have a height of 36"
d) Shall have connection details adequate to resist the horizontal force prescribed in
UBC Table 16-B
e) Openings between railings shall be less than 4"
Carlsbad 05-2057
October 25, 2O05
105 Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003 3382
a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at anv point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12
inches from where the treads are narrowest.
11 Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 1003 3 3 6 IT SEEMS NONE
SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED AGAIN. PLEASE SHOW DETAILS.
a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways having four or more stairs
b) Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one
handrail (if not open on both sides)
c) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be
continuous
d) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more
than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension Handrails projecting from walls shall
have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail
e) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends
f) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed
by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall be less than 6"
• GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
12 In addition to the information shown on the plans, specify in the following locations
should be of safety glazing material in accordance with UBC Section 2406 4 (see
exceptions) PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors
other than ward robe doors See the Master bedroom • IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON
SHEETS A2 AS RESPONDED
• ROOFING
13 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof and balcony materials, per
UBC Section 10633 IT SEEMS ICBO WAS INDICATED ON THE SHEET A4 BUT
HARD TO READ.
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Material weight
c) Product name/number
d) ICBO approval number, or equal
15 Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a
minimum of V4 inch per foot for drainage UBC Section 1402 3 PLEASE SHOW THE
REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THE BALCONIES/DECK. PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
Carlsbad O5-2057
October 25, 20O5
• GARAGE AND CARPORTS
17. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for
openings between garage and dwelling Section 302 4 THE RESPONSE WAS A1 BUT SEEMS NONE
SHOWN. PLEASE SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE.
18 All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting
floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage THE RESPONSE
WAS A1 BUT SEEMS NONE SHOWN.side UBC Section 302 2
The structural plans are incomplete and vague. The following corrections are
general in nature and based on the response more corrections may follow. For a
complete review, submit construction drawings that reflect the scope of work.
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
THE ITEMS 24 -32 BELOW WERE RESPONDED TO BUT NO REVISED PLANS AS
RESPONDED WERE SUBMITTED.
24 If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations note on
the foundation plan that PLEASE SHOW THE REQUESTED NOTE ON THE
FOUNDATION PLAN.
a) "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection,
the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that
b) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
c) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
d) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing
capacity conform to the soils report"
25. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated
into the construction documents.
29 Provide calculations for mam vertical and horizontal framing member loads on the
footings UBC Section 106 3 3 Based on the response more corrections may follow
a) PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAIL FOR THE APEX OF THE RR1 RAFTERS
ABOVE THE BEAM RB2 ABOVE THE STAIRS.
b) PLEASE SHOW ON THE FLOOR PLANS WHERE THE SECTIONS CUT WERE
Carlsbad O5-2057
October 25, 2O05
C) THE ROOF SYSTEM REFLECTED ON THE SHEET S-3 ABOVE THE MASTER'S
BATH IS NOT CLEAR HOW IT WOULD BE FRAMED. IT SHOWS RR1 AND HIP
JACKS.
d) PLEASE SHOW SHEAR TRANSFER DETAIL ON THE PLANS FROM THE
DIAPHRAGMS TO THE INTERIOR SHEAR WALLS. PLEASE CROSS
REFERENCE THE SAME TO THE FRAMING PLANS.
e) Drag collectors are required to transmit the tributary lateral load to the
respective resisting elements. Please submit analysis. Anv recommendations
should be detailed on the plans and cross referenced to the framing plan.
PLEASE SEE LINES B. D. 2 . 3. ETC.
f) PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAILS OF THE DRAG COLLECTORS TO THE
RESPECTIVE RESISTING ELEMENTS.
9) PLEASE SIZE OF THE STUDS AT THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE STAIRS.
h) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LATERAL FLOOR LOAD ABOVE THE OFFICE AND
BEDROOM. TO THE LEFT OF THE LIVING ROOM. WOULD BE SUPPORTED IN
THE Y-Y DIRECTION.
i) IT SEEMS THAT THE RB2 DID NOT CONSIDER THE POINT LOAD FROM THE
APEX OF THE RR1.
j) THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDED 24" DEEP FOR THE PAD FOOTINGS BUT
THE SCHEDULE SHOWS DIFFERENTLY.
k) PLEASE SHOW HOLDQWN DETAILS ON THE PLANS FOR THE SHEAR WALLS
CONNECTION AT THE FLOOR LEVEL. PLEASE CROSS REFERENCE THE
SAME ON THE FRAMING PLAN.
I) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE SHEAR LOAD ALONG LINES 5 & 6 AT THE ROOF
LEVEL WOULD BE TRANSFERRED THRU TO THE RESISTING ELEMENTS.
PLEASE SEE TOWARDS LINES 6.1 & 6.5 RESPECTIVELY.
ml A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE.
• FRAMING
30. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss
identification numbers on the plans. Or submit a deferral.
Carlsbad O5-2O57
October 25, 2OO5
31 Show draglines and girder trusses on the plans FOR THE DRAG TRUSSES TO BE
DESIGNED ACCORDINGLY. THE DESIGNED DRAG FORCE SHOULD BE SHOWN
RESPECTIVELY.
32. Note on the plan that the structural consultant shall provide a letter of review for
the truss plans and calculations with their stibmittal.
35. Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic
and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs, 22" x 30" mav be used if the
equipment size allows. Or submit a deferral. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
THE NEW LOCATION OF THE FAU'S SHOULD BE ON AN 18" PLATFORM. WITH
BARRIER FROM WHEEL IMPACT.
• ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
51 Show on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art 210-52(a)
NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A1 AS RESPONDED.
52 For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at
grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling NEC Art 210-
52 (e) This receptacle must be GFCI protected NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A2 AS
RESPONDED.
53 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets in kitchens and dining areas of
dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12
inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24
inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space Island and
peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one
receptacle Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be
considered as separate countertop spaces NEC Art 210-52(c) THE RESPONSE
WAS HARD TO READ!!!!
54 Per NEC Art 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either
SEEMS NO RESPONSE
A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets
55 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom NEC Art
210-52(d) PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LAVATORIES
56. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways 10 feet or more in length shall
have at least one receptacle outlet. NEC Art. 210-52fh^.
Carlsbad O5-2O57
October 25, 2O05
58. AM bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the
plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art.
210-12fbl.
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
64 Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy
standards. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE
EXISTING ENVELOPE SHOULD COMPLY ALSO TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
REFLECTED IN THE ANALYSIS. THIS INTENTIONS/INDICATIONS SHOULD BE
REFLECTED ON THE COVER SHEET. ALSO. PLEASE SEE ITEM 69 BELOW~
65. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to be either imprinted on the
plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare
the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. THE INDEX SHOWS
THE TITLE 24 ON SHEET A-6 BUT NOT SUBMITTED.
66. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchenfsl
and bathrooms (containing a'tub or shower).
67. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified bv the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations."
• MISCELLANEOUS
68. Please reconcile the drawing index with the sheets of the plans.
69. Please complete the building data.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In fartnersntp with government for (Ruihfing Safety
DATE- August 23, 2005 a APPLICANT
QCJURJ^
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057 SET II
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
*
PROJECT NAME Baum Residence Addition/Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
I | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Bill Perry
550 2nd Street
Encmitas, Ca92024
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Bill Perry Telephone # 760 809 8810 or 760 931 1792
Date contacted fr /2S/o5(by ^ ) Fax # ? 760931 1892
Mail.—-Telephone*^ Faxi^ In Person
REMARKS
By Bert Domingo FOR BRIAN ZUPIGER Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 8/16/05
tmsmtl dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS 1O14 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 8/16/05
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2O57
SET II
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
August 23, 2005
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to
B To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Carlsbad O5-2O57
August 23, 2005
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways THERE ARE A LOT OF HAND WRITTEN
INFORMATION IN BALLPOINT INK ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. PLEASE MAKE
THE CORRECTIONS ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AS REQUESTED BEFORE.
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-
2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete
3 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or
architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code). THIS
WILL BE CHECKED WHEN ALL THE ITEMS BELOW ARE MET.
4 Clearly show the existing versus the proposed on each sheet The foundation details are
for a new house Please incorporate details that show how the new construction will
connect to the existing construction. THE RESPONSE WAS S-1 BUT THE SAME
SHEET DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW ANY OF THE REQUESTED INFORMATION.
5 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a
format similar to that shown below UBC Section 106 3 2. PLEASE SHOW ON THE
COVER SHEET AS REQUESTED.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with UBC Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS YES PER APPROVING REPORT
6 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an
inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to
issuance of the building permit Please review UBC Section 106 3 5 Please complete
parts 1, 2 & 3 of the attached form and resubmit. THE RESPONSE WAS ATTACHED
BUT SEEMS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THIS PACKAGE.
Carlsbad O5-2057
August 23, 2005
7 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal
(trusses, etc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per UBC Sec
106342 NO RESPONSE
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or
engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a
notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that
they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building The
deferred submrttal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal
documents have been approved by the building official"
• FIRE PROTECTION
8 When the valuation of a room addition exceeds $1,000, show permanently wired smoke
detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction, except that smoke
detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered UBC Section
310912 IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A1 & 2 AS RESPONDED
a) Inside each bedroom
b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms
c) On each story
d) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the
stair
e) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling
height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway
NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in aj| sleeping areas of the unit UBC
Section 3109 1
• EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
9 Provide stairway and landing details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Sections
1003 3 3- IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN AT THE STAIRS AS RESPONDED
a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less than 10
occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum
10 Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 509 1 IT
SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED
a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor openings
b) Shall be installed at balconies more than 30" above grade or floor below
c) Shall have a height of 36"
d) Shall have connection details adequate to resist the horizontal force prescnbed in
UBC Table 16-B
e) Openings between railings shall be less than 4"
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
11 Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section 1003 3 3 6 IT
SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON SHEETS A4 AS RESPONDED
a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways having four or more stairs
b) Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one
handrail (if not open on both sides)
c) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be
continuous
d) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more
than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension Handrails projecting from walls shall
have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail
e) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends
f) Openings between railings shall be less than 4" The triangular openings formed
by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall be less than 6"
• GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
12 In addition to the information shown on the plans, specify in the following locations
should be of safety glazing material in accordance with UBC Section 2406 4 (see
exceptions)
a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors
other than wardrobe doors See the Master bedroom IT SEEMS NONE SHOWN ON
SHEETS A2 AS RESPONDED
• ROOFING
13 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof and balcony materials, per
UBC Section 106 3 3 IT SEEMS ICBO WAS INDICATED ON THE SHEET A4 BUT
HARD TO READ.
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Material weight
c) Product name/number
d) ICBO approval number, or equal
15 Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a
minimum of % inch per foot for drainage UBC Section 1402 3. PLEASE SHOW THE
REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THE BALCONIES/DECK.
• GARAGE AND CARPORTS
17 Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for
openings between garage and dwelling Section 302 4 THE RESPONSE WAS A1 BUT
SEEMS NONE SHOWN.
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
18 All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting
floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage THE RESPONSE
WAS A1 BUT SEEMS NONE SHOWN.side UBC Section 302 2
The structural plans are incomplete and vague. The following corrections are
general in nature and based on the response more corrections may follow. For a
complete review, submit construction drawings that reflect the scope of work.
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
24 If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations note on
the foundation plan that PLEASE SHOW THE REQUESTED NOTE ON THE
FOUNDATION PLAN.
a) "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection,
the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that
b) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
c) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
d) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing
capacity conform to the soils report"
25. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated
into the construction documents.
29 Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing member loads on the
footings UBC Section 106 3 3 Based on the response more corrections may follow
a) PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAIL FOR THE APEX OF THE RR1 RAFTERS
ABOVE THE BEAM RB2 ABOVE THE STAIRS.
b) PLEASE SHOW ON THE FLOOR PLANS WHERE THE SECTIONS CUT WERE
TAKEN.
c) THE ROOF SYSTEM REFLECTED ON THE SHEET S-3 ABOVE THE MASTER'S
BATH IS NOT CLEAR HOW IT WOULD BE FRAMED. IT SHOWS RR1 AND HIP
d) PLEASE SHOW SHEAR TRANSFER DETAIL ON THE PLANS FROM THE
DIAPHRAGMS TO THE INTERIOR SHEAR WALLS. PLEASE CROSS
REFERENCE THE SAME TO THE FRAMING PLANS.
Carlsbad O5-2O57
August 23, 20O5
e) Drag collectors are required to transmit the tributary lateral load to the
respective resisting elements. Please submit analysis. Anv recommendations
should be detailed on the plans and cross referenced to the framing plan.
PLEASE SEE LINES B. D. 2 . 3. ETC.
f) PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAILS OF THE DRAG COLLECTORS TO THE
RESPECTIVE RESISTING ELEMENTS.
g) PLEASE SIZE OF THE STUDS AT THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE STAIRS.
h) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LATERAL FLOOR LOAD ABOVE THE OFFICE AND
BEDROOM. TO THE LEFT OF THE LIVING ROOM. WOULD BE SUPPORTED IN
THE Y-Y DIRECTION.
i) IT SEEMS THAT THE RB2 DID NOT CONSIDER THE POINT LOAD FROM THE
APEX OF THE RR1.
j) THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDED 24" DEEP FOR THE PAD FOOTINGS BUT
THE SCHEDULE SHOWS DIFFERENTLY.
k) PLEASE SHOW HOLDOWN DETAILS ON THE PLANS FOR THE SHEAR WALLS
CONNECTION AT THE FLOOR LEVEL. PLEASE CROSS REFERENCE THE
SAME ON THE FRAMING PLAN.
I) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE SHEAR LOAD ALONG LINES 5 & 6 AT THE ROOF
LEVEL WOULD BE TRANSFERRED THRU TO THE RESISTING ELEMENTS.
PLEASE SEE TOWARDS LINES 6.1 & 6.5 RESPECTIVELY.
ml A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE.
• FRAMING
30. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss
identification numbers on the plans. Or submit a deferral.
31 Show draglines and girder trusses on the plans FOR THE DRAG TRUSSES TO BE
DESIGNED ACCORDINGLY. THE DESIGNED DRAG FORCE SHOULD BE SHOWN
RESPECTIVELY.
32. Note on the plan that the structural consultant shall provide a letter of review for
the truss plans and calculations with their submittal.
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
34 Include the FAD and platform on in the truss layout and calculations Or submit a
deferral THE RESPONSE WAS DEFERRAL. PLEASE CLARIFY.
35. Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic
and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs. 22" x 30" mav be used if the
equipment size allows. Or submit a deferral. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
• NONE WAS RESPONDED TO.
40. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or
systems. Based on the response more corrections may follow.
41. Show source of combustion air to furnace per Chapter 7 UMC. Specify the location
and sizes of both of the combustion air openings.
42. Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. UMC
Section 903.
43. Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be
unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not
more than 20 feet in length through the attic. UMC Section 908.0.
44. Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a
switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic space. UMC Section
908.0.
/
45. Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than the
furnace or furnaces being installed. UMC Section 904.1.
46. Provide installation details for furnaces located on the roof or the building exterior,
UMC Section 910.0.
47. The maximum length of a clothes dryer duct is 14 feet with (two) 90° elbows. All
terminations shall be 3' from any opening in a building. UMC Section 504.2.2.
• ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
51 Show on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art. 210-52(a)
NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A1 AS RESPONDED.
52 For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at
grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling NEC Art 210-
52 (e) This receptacle must be GFCI protected NONE SHOWN ON SHEET A2 AS
RESPONDED.
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
53 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets in kitchens and dining areas of
dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12
inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24
inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space Island and
peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one
receptacle Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be
considered as separate counter top spaces NEC Art 210-52(c) THE RESPONSE
WAS HARD TO READ!!!!
54 Per NEC Art 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either
SEEMS NO RESPONSE
A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets
55 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom NEC Art
210-52(d) PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LAVATORIES
56. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways 10 feet or more in length shall
have at least one receptacle outlet. NEC Art. 210-52(h).
58. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the
plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art.
210-12fbl
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
64 Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy
standards. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE
EXISTING ENVELOPE SHOULD COMPLY ALSO TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
REFLECTED IN THE ANALYSIS. THIS INTENTIONS/INDICATIONS SHOULD BE
REFLECTED ON THE COVER SHEET. ALSO. PLEASE SEE ITEM 69 BELOW
65. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to
be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the
plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction
with the requirements of the approved energy design.
66. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchenfs)
and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower).
67. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified bv the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC1 and showing
compliance with the energy calculations."
• MISCELLANEOUS
68. Please reconcile the drawing index with the sheets of the plans.
69. Please complete the building data.
Carlsbad O5-2O57
August 23, 2OO5
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation Thank you
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No 05-2057
Job Address or Legal Description 1014 Tulip Way
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building
Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection
during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she
is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate
materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is required to
submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she
inspected and approved The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection
reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department.
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items
indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
(over)
Carlsbad 05-2057
August 23, 2005
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1014 Tulip Way
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 05-2057 OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I,
or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as
required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at
the site listed above UBC Section 106 3 5
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as
required by UBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above
Engineer's/Architect t Seal
& Signature Hare
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
D Field Welding
HH Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI
n Prestressed Concrete
D Structural Masonry
D High Strength Bolting
D Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
D Sprayed-On Fireproofing
D Designer Specified
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above:
A.
B.
C.
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A.
B.
C.
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval pnor to beginning work on the job site
EsGii Corporation
In Partnership with government for <Bwhfing Safety
DATE June 17, 2005 a APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad Q PDS^REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057 SET I
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Baum Residence Addition/ Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
• The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
I | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Bill Perry
550 2nd Street
Encmitas, Ca92024
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Bill Perry Telephone # 760 809 8810 or 760 931 1792
Date contacted ^Ufo5"(by fc~ ) Fax# ^760)934=t89g- ^fr"?-
Mail -^Telephone */ Fax1^ In Person
REMARKS
By Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/O7/05
trnsmtl dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad O5-2O57
June 17, 2005
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO 05-2057 JURISDICTION. Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
FLOOR AREA See Below STORIES 2
Dwelling addition 2101 ft2
Dwelling remodel 1735 ft3 HEIGHT 24'-6" at north elev. sheet A-3.
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION ESGIL CORPORATION 06/07/05
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER. Bryan Zuppiger
COMPLETED June 17, 2005
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), that adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC, 2000
UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02)
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list for a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 05-2057
June 17, 2005
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing,
corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the
City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA
92008, and (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil
Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123,
and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and
calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for
routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until
review by EsGil Corporation is complete
2 The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans
(California Business and Professions Code)
3 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the
engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for
their preparation Specify expiration date of license (California Business and
Professions Code)
4 Clearly show the existing versus the proposed on each sheet The foundation
details are for a new house Please incorporate details that show how the new
construction will connect to the existing construction
5 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below UBC Section 106 3 2
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also
require Special Inspection in accordance with UBC Sec 1701 of the Uniform
Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
• EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS YES PER APPROVING REPORT
6 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official
for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please review UBC Section
106 3 5 Please complete parts 1, 2 & 3 of the attached form and resubmit
Carlsbad 05-2O57
June 17, 2005
7 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred
submittal (trusses, etc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans.
perUBCSec 10634.2
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the
architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the
building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents
have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general
conformance with the design of the building The deferred submittal items shall
NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved
by the building official"
• FIRE PROTECTION
8 When the valuation of a room addition exceeds $1,000, show permanently wired
smoke detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction.
except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery
powered UBC Section 310 9 1 2
a) Inside each bedroom
b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms
c) On each story
d) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to
the stair
e) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have
a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway
NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit.
UBC Section 310 91
• EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
9 Provide stairway and landing details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC
Sections 100333
a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less
than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8"
maximum and run 9" minimum
10 Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section
5091
a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor openings
b) Shall be installed at balconies more than 30" above grade or floor below
c) Shall have a height of 36"
d) Shall have connection details adequate to resist the horizontal force
prescribed in UBC Table 16-B
e) Openings between railings shall be less than 4"
Carlsbad O5-2O57
June 17, 20O5
11 Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan UBC Section
1003336
a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways having four or more
stairs Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit
may have one handrail (if not open on both sides)
b) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and
be continuous
c) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches
nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension Handrails projecting
from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the
handrail
d) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or
bends
e) Openings between railings shall be less than 4" The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall
be less than 6"
• GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
12 In addition to the information shown on the plans, specify in the following
locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with UBC Section
2406 4 (see exceptions)
a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging
doors other than wardrobe doors See the Master bedroom
• ROOFING
13 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof and balcony materials,
per UBC Section 106 3 3
a) Manufacturer's name.
b) Material weight
c) Product name/number
d) ICBO approval number, or equal
14 Show a 22"x30" access from the existing attic to the new attic
15 Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be
sloped a minimum of % inch per foot for drainage UBC Section 1402 3
16 Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible
and will not cause damage to the building If the roof drain terminates through a
wall, the overflow dram shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof dram. Policy
84-35
Carlsbad 05-2O57
June 17, 2005
• GARAGE AND CARPORTS
17. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly,
for openings between garage and dwelling Section 302 4
18. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns
supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage
side UBC Section 302 2
The structural plans are incomplete and vague. The following corrections
are general in nature and based on the response more corrections may
follow. For a complete review, submit construction drawings that reflect
the scope of work.
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
19 All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report An update
letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old If a room addition is less
than 1000 sq ft in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required
20 Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by an Architect or Civil
Engineer licensed by the State of California The report shall include foundation
design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with
UBC Section 1804
21 In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor Identify this
value in the soils report and on the plans UBC Section 1629 4 2
22 Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil
instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4 This does not apply to detached, single-
story dwellings UBC Section 1804.5
23 Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and
the allowable bearing value UBC Section 106 3.3.
24 If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations
note on the foundation plan that
"Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection,
the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that
a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report"
Carlsbad 05-2057
June 17, 2005
25 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report)
26 Specify size, I C B O number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion
anchors or epoxy anchors Show edge and end distances and spacing UBC
Section 10633
27 Show size, embedment and location of epoxy hold down anchors on foundation
plan UBC Section 106 3 3
28 Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation
inspection UBC Section 108 5 2
29 Provide calculations for mam vertical and horizontal framing member loads on
the footings UBC Section 106 3 3 Based on the response more corrections may
follow
• FRAMING
30 Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project Specify truss
identification numbers on the plans Or submit a deferral
31 Show draglines and girder trusses on the plans
32 Note on the plan that the structural consultant shall provide a letter of review for
the truss plans and calculations with their submittal
33 Check all headers for reactions from the Girder trusses
34 Include the FAU and platform on in the truss layout and calculations. Or submit a
deferral
35 Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic
and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs, 22" x 30" may be used if the
equipment size allows Or submit a deferral
36 If existing trusses are being modified please analyze and submit design Or
submit a deferral
37 Specify all header sizes for openings at the roof framing and floor framing plan
over 4' wide and the size is not identified on the plans UBC Section 2320 116
38 Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related
Section UBC 106 3 3 Based on the response more corrections may follow
39 Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per UBC
Section 1630 1 1 Based on the response more corrections may follow
Carlsbad 05-2057
June 17, 2005
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
40 Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or
systems Based on the response more corrections may follow
41 Show source of combustion air to furnace per Chapter 7 UMC Specify the
location and sizes of both of the combustion air openings
42 Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace UMC
Section 903
43 Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be
unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide,
not more than 20 feet in length through the attic UMC Section 908 0
44 Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a
switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic space UMC
Section 908 0
45 Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than
the furnace or furnaces being installed UMC Section 904 1
46 Provide installation details for furnaces located on the roof or the building
exterior, UMC Section 910 0
47 The maximum length of a clothes dryer duct is 14 feet with (two) 90° elbows All
terminations shall be 3' from any opening in a building UMC Section 504 2 2
• ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
48 Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service and sub-panels, the
location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels If service is over
200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations
49 In addition to the information shown on the plans, show on the plan the
amperage and location of sub-panels Subpanels are not approved in garage
firewalls, bathrooms, clothes or linen closets
50 Install a panel, grounding electrode, water and gas bond at each building's
electric panel NEC Sections 230-70 & 250-24 (a) see exceptions
51 Show on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art
210-52(a)
52 For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet
accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the
dwelling NEC Art 210-52 (e) This receptacle must be GFCI protected
Carlsbad O5-2O57
June 17, 2005
53 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets in kitchens and dining
areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter
space wider than 12 inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along
the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle
outlet in that space Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or
greater) shall have at least one receptacle Counter top spaces separated by
range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top
spaces NEC Art 210-52(c)
54 Per NEC Art 210-11 (c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be
either
a) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
b) At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets
55 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom
NEC Art 210-52(d)
56 Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways 10 feet or more in length
shall have at least one receptacle outlet NEC Art 210-52(h)
57 Show at least one wall switch-controlled lighting outlet to be installed in every
habitable room, in bathrooms, hallways, stairways, attached garages, and
detached garages with electric power, and at the exterior side of outdoor
entrances or exits At interior stairways show 3-way switching for lighting outlets
at each floor level where there are six or more steps NEC Art 210(a)
58 All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection Note clearly on the
plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected " NEC Art
210-12(b)
59 Show on the plan that all 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles
installed in bathrooms, garages, basements, outdoors, at all kitchen counters
and at wet bar sinks comply with the ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection
specified in NEC Art 210-8
• PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
60 Show water heater size (1st hour rating), type, and location on plans UPC
Section 501 0
61 In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle
damage An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement
UPC, Section 5103
62 Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior
UPC, Section 608 5
Carlsbad O5-2O57
June 17, 2O05
63 In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist
seismic forces Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap
at bottom 1/3 of the tank) UPC, Section 510 5
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
64 Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current
energy standards
65 The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to
be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the
plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction
with the requirements of the approved energy design
66 Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s)
and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower)
67 Note on the plans "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations "
• MISCELLANEOUS
68 Please reconcile the drawing index with the sheets of the plans
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of
858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at
Esgil Corporation Thank you
Carlsbad O5-2057
June 17, 2005
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No 05-2057
Job Address or Legal Description 1014 Tulip Way
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the
Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous
inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of
this sheet
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which
he/she is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept
alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is
required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that
he/she inspected and approved The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special
Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the
items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet
(over)
Carlsbad O5-2O57
June 17, 2005
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1014 Tulip Way
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: O5-2O57 OWNER'S NAME: _
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may oat employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspectors) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction
project located at foe site listed above UBC Section 106.3 5
Signed
~~*^ r /
I, as the engineer/architect of record, cerjffy that I have prepared the following special inspection
program as required bylJBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above
Signed L
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
D Field Welding D
B
Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI
Prestressed Concrete
Structural Masonry
High Strength Bolting
^Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
Sprayed-On Flreprooflng
Designer Specified
2. Name(s) of indlvldual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special Inspections listed
above:
A.
B.
C.
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A.
B.
C.
Special Inspectors shall check In with the City and present their credentials for approval prior ^ beginning work on the job site
10 3EWd ma er-si g00z/«/T0
Carlsbad 05-2057
June 17, 2005
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1014 Tulip Way
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 05-2057 OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
mspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above UBC Section 106 3 5
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection
program as required by UBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above
Enginwr's/Archltact * S«l
& Signature H«ra
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
D Field Welding
G Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI
n Prestressed Concrete
n Structural Masonry
D High Strength Bolting
G Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
n Sprayed-On Fireproofing
n Designer Specified
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above-
A.
B.
C.
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A.
B.
C.
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval pnor to beginning work on the job site
City of Carlsbad
Public Works — Engineering
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE Uk/05
BUILDING ADDRESS fV{ ^
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
7b(,>
r)(L(~' L/
PLANCHECK NO CB <^7S>?O S ~7
9 { AJA,/
1 ' /
'(0 '{£. EST VALUE d^l.KO
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal, therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build
D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements
DENIAL
Please see the attached report of deficiencies
marked with D Make necessary corrections to plans
or specifications for compliance with applicable
codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review
By
By
By
Date
Date
Date
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:,
Date
D Dedication Application
D Dedication Checklist
0 Improvement Application
D Improvement Checklist
D Future Improvement Agreement
D Grading Permit Application
0 Grading Submittal Checklist
D Right-of-Way Permit Application
rj Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
D Sewer Fee Information Sheet
Name
ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON
JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ
Address
Phone
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 602-2775
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No
Lots
Recordation
Carlsbad Tract
Car|sbad CA 9200817314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760)
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST J
RD
D
3'
D
SITE PLAN
1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show
A North Arrow
B Existing & Proposed Structures
C Existing Street Improvements
D Property Lines
E Easements
Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Driveway widths
Existing or proposed sewer lateral
Existing or proposed water service
D D 2 Show on site plan
A Drainage Patterns
1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course
2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building"
B Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
C Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s)
that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, second
dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception
D Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards
3 Include on title sheet
A Site address
B Assessor's Parcel Number
C Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc) previously approved
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
F BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLSTFORM doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
• ST RD3
D
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No
D 4b All conditions are in compliance Date
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
Q 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 15.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18 40 030
Dedication required as follows
Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Vz x 11" plat map and
submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and signed
by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax
Dedication completed by Date
D n D
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $ 75.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
1840040
Public improvements required as follows
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process The completed application form and the requirements on the
F \BUILOINO PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc Rev 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
«ST ,ND jRD
D D
checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit
Improvement Plans signed by Date
6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $360 so we may
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit
Future public improvements required as follows
D D
D D
6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department
Neighborhood Improvement
Agreement completed by
Date
6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective
improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy
n
n n
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
15 16 010 of the Municipal Code
7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import,
export and remedial) This information must be included on the plans.
7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit
Grading Inspector sign off by Date
7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required )
F \BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
3RD
D 7d No Grading Permit required
D n D 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
D 8 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are
not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities
Right-of-Way permit required for
9 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Cammo Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance
Industrial Waste permit accepted by
Date
E/
D D 10 NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first
[U EH 11 0 Required fees are attached
[/No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
D 12a Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used
• All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service
FeUIUWWPUUICHECKCia.STFORM.cloc c R«v 7/1*00
iST sRD
D D 12b
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
• If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit
• Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter
• If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the
installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street)
Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow
these guidelines
1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled T,
and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should
look like
STA1+00 Install 2" service and
5 meter (estimated 100 gpm)
2 If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference In general the calculations will include
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
F \BUILOING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc
., ST 2ND 3RD
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future
12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above
2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this
13 Additional Comments;
F \BUHDINGPLANCHECKCKLST FORM doc -7 Rev 7/14/00
Q] 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:. North arrow, property lines,
easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way
width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard
slopes).
Q 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
D
an
Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines
1. Applicability: YES_^_NO
2. Project compiles YES NO
a
Zoning:
1. Setbacks:
Front
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear
Top of slope:
2.
Structure\separation:
3. Lot Coverage:
Required.
Required.
Required.
Required.
Required.
ire setbacks:
Required.
Required.
Required.
Required.
Required _
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.
Shown
Required.7-
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.
Shown.A
4. Height Required.Shown.
Spaces Required.Shown.5. Parking:
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown
tf
Additional Comments.
/(//W TV S^tQB
) frON C0f\fF<?frM(N6
DJCTO ISSUE WND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER
H^AOMI^«COUNTEF^BIdgPlnct*RtvCI*W
13.
Planning Department
City Of Carlsbad
Faraday Road
Carlsbad, CA
RE: Side Yard Setbacks, Plan Check #05-2057
Dear Planning Director,
Attached please find documentation showing that the above
referenced permit for the property located at 1014 Tulip Way does conform
to the side yard set backs. As per the requirements stated in Chapter
21.10.070, section 1, paragraph b. Please contact me directly if you need
further documentation or clarification. I thank you in advance for your help
with this matter
Respectfully,
Ray Baum
Home Owner
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, Ca
760-931-6797
Hi
PLANNINCMDERART^CENT APPROVAL
RECOMMENDEDBK
06/27/2005 17-35 7604361213 BILL PERRY PAGE 01
ttftf p-
\ o
t
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
DATE: / /
Director
DATE:/£/8/5
RECOMMENDED BYT/Lr I*
r-*^
r swi»sn™s»*'
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
BAUM RESIDENCE
Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California
Job. No. 513
July 11,2005
I*
• • i• ••
•• • •
ar
7107 Broadway, #316
Lemon Grove, CA 91945
Tel (619) 262-4832 Fax (619) 262-4878
July 11,2005
Mr RayBaum
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
Project Job No 513
Baum Residence
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
Subject Report of Geotechnical Investigation
Dear Mr Baum
In accordance with your request, we have completed a Report of Geotechnical
Investigation for the proposed project We are presenting to you, herewith, our findings,; •. •.
conclusions and recommendations for the construction of the proposed additign/£ernodel
The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the
if the recommendations provided in our attached report are incorporated into
construction of the project
Baum Residence
July 11,2005
Job No 513
Page 2
If you have any questions after reviewing the findings, conclusions and recommendations
contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office This opportunity to
be of professional service is sincerely appreciated
Respectfully submitted,
tffar
Dennis E Zimmerman, CE 26676, GE 928, Expires 3/31/06
Geotechmcal Engineer
Attachments
Distribution (3) Addressee
DEZmb
• •• • i • • ••••• •••
• •
<J-Jen friar
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
BAUM RESIDENCE
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For:
Mr. Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California
JOB NO. 513
July 11,2005
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction and Project Description 1
Project Scope 2
Findings 3
Site Descnption 3
Subsurface Conditions 3
Formation 3
Fill 3
Groundwater 3
Geologic Hazards 4
Faults and Seismic Hazards 4
Seismicity of Major Faults 6
Liquefaction 6
Landslides and Slope Stability 7
Conclusions and Recommendations 7
Site Preparation 7
Existing Soil 7
Soil Suitability 8
Expansive Soil 8
Imported Fill 8
Surface Drainage 8
Earthwork 9
Foundation Recommendations 9
Footings 9
Lateral Resistance •,..; JO
Footing Observations m 10
Concrete Slabs-On-Grade i\!ll
Transition Areas • » • • 12
Footing Setbacks I .*. *****J2
Active Pressure ^ t't * * * \ 13
Backfill *.: .* %,M3
Seismic Site Categorization • 13
Field Explorations „ ,.J4
Laboratory Testing 15
Limitations 15
• ••• •
<Jjen 11 far
Page
Attachments 18
Plate Number 1 Subsurface Exploration Legend 19
Plate Number 2 Subsurface Exploration Log T-l 20
Plate Number 3 Subsurface Exploration Log T-2 21
Plate Number 4 Laboratory Test Results 22
Plate Number 5 Removal Depths, Table I 23
Appendix I 24
Standard Specifications for Construction of Controlled Fills 25
Appendix II 29
References 30
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 2
Project Scope
This investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance coupled with a subsurface
exploration Representative soil samples were obtained from the site and returned to our
laboratory for observation and testing The results of the field and laboratory data collected are
presented in this report
Specifically, the intent of this investigation was to
a) Address geologic hazards, including faults and seismicity
b) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths that could be influenced by the
proposed construction,
c) Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent static physical properties of the various
soil and rock stratigraphic units which could influence the development of this
project, including bearing capacities, lateral soil pressures, and settlement
potential, and
d) Present recommendations for foundation design and floor slab support ;..,?-
3 •> ->
This report has been prepared for Mr Ray Baum to be used in the evaluaiym and 4e§igri
33
t > » 1
of the proposed project This report has not been prepared for use by other pames, and m?y hbt>
"*»u •« •
contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses The information Hbfhis
report represents professional opinions that have been developed using that degree of care and
f< 33m,
skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechmcal consultants
practicing in this or similar localities No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the
professional advice included in this report
ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11, 2005 Page 4
significant "cut" or any "below-grade" structures Therefore, consideration must be given to
appropriate surface and subsurface drainage systems, such as underdrams and concrete surface
swales
Geologic Hazards
Faults and Seismic Hazards: The numerous fault zones in southern California include
active, potentially active, and inactive faults Active faults are those which display evidence of
movement within Holocene time (from the present to approximately 11 thousand years) Faults
that have ruptured geologic units of Pleistocene age (11 thousand to 2 million years) but not
Holocene age materials are considered potentially active Inactive faults are those which exhibit
movement that is older than 2 million years
According to available published information, there are no known active or potentially
active faults which intercept the project site The site is not located within an Alquist-Pnolo
Special Studies Zone Therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is consideredJRAv**
There are, however, several active faults located in close proximity, andthtAtment * *
associated with them could cause significant ground motion at the site Nearby^ faults mclude*ttie
Rose Canyon fault zone, which lies approximately 5 miles offshore to the westjtRet^oronafio^*
Bank fault zone, located approximately 22 miles to the southwest (offshore) and the Elsm6W»«*
• • •
fault zone, which occurs 24 miles to the northeast Evidence suggesting movement along tlie
Rose Canyon fault zone during the Holocene has been presented by Moore and Kennedy (1975)
The State of California has zoned portions of the Rose Canyon fault zone as active under the
••••••
•**•*•
* .....
ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 5
Alquist-Pnolo Senate Bill This has come about as a result of faulted paleosols in Rose Canyon
that are considered to be unquestionably of Holocene age (T Rockwell, 1989)
The Coronado Bank fault zone is a complex series of left-and-nght stepping enechelon
faults Marine geophysical studies performed by Kennedy and Welday (1980) and others have
provided evidence that Holocene sediments have been offset by several faults associated with the
Coronado Bank fault zone Therefore, this fault system should also be considered active
The Elsinore fault zone, which occurs approximately 24 miles to the northeast, is
considered active with an estimated average recurrence interval of 60 years
The table below presents the maximum credible and maximum probable earthquake
magnitudes and estimated peak ground accelerations anticipated at the site These accelerations
are based on the assumption that the maximum probable earthquake occurs on specific faults at
the closest point on that particular fault to the site
The maximum credible earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that appears to
be reasonably capable of occurring under the conditions of the presently known geologic. .
framework The probability of such an earthquake occurring during the lifetime of this
• • •considered low The maximum probable earthquake is considered an event hajving a return.,
period of 100 years .•:*•.
••
•
• •• • ..
Baum Residence
July 11,2005
Job No 513
Page 6
Seismicity of Major Faults
Fault
Coronado Banks
Elsmore
Rose Canyon
San Andreas
San Jacmto
Distance
(Miles)
22
24
5
74
48
Maximum
Credible
Magnitude
(Richter)
7 6L(2)
75L(3)
70M2)
83U3)
78U3)
Maximum
Probable
Magnitude
(Richter)
67
66
59
80
70
Estimated
Bedrock
Acceleration
(g)
016
015
037
008
007
L= Local Magnitude (1) Seed and Idnss, 1982
(2) Slemmons, 1979
(3) Greensfelder, C D M G Map Sheet 23,1994
The preceding table suggests that the Rose Canyon fault zone would have the
predominant influence on the site The postulated design earthquake and ground acceleration is
presented in the table below
Design Earthquake
Fault Zone
Source
Maximum
Probable
Magnitude
(Richter)
* Sustained • *Peak Ground
Acceleration Acceleratioti*";
(g) (g) • •••
Rose Canyon 59 037 024
Sustained Acceleration considered to be
65% of peak ground acceleration
• • •• • •• • •
• • i• • •
Liquefaction: The property is underlain by very dense formational soil In addition,
groundwater was not observed Based on the consistency of the underlying matenals and the
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11, 2005 Page?
anticipated recompaction of overburden soils and the construction of drainage systems, the
potential for generalized liquefaction in the event of a strong to moderate earthquake on nearby
faults is considered very low
Landslides and Slope Stability: No evidence suggesting the presence of deep seated
landslides was observed on the project site or immediate site vicinity No jointing, fractures,
remolded clay seams or other adverse geologic structures were noted within the exploratory
trench excavations
Conclusions and Recommendations
Site Preparation:
Existing Soil: Fill soils were encountered beneath the existing ground surface in trenches T-l
and T-2 The fill soils are not uniformly consolidated and therefore are not considered suitable
for foundation, driveway, hardscape or floor slab support
To provide more uniform support for the proposed footings and slabs-on-grade, wt
recommend that any existing fill, or otherwise unsuitable soil material beneatltthi ifcw footings
and slabs be removed to very dense formational soil The new footings shall be'suiJported oft**
undisturbed very dense soil The slabs-on-grade shall be entirely supported oa«»«ii«imum of
•••••• ••••
one foot of compacted soil or entirely on undisturbed very dense soil * * * *
Based on the results of our analysis, it appears that the depth of removal will range from
1 to l'/2 feet Table I (Plate No 5) of this report presents anticipated removal depths in the area
ff/ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 PageS
of our subsurface explorations If groundwater is encountered during the removal and
recompaction of the soil, or if difficulty is experienced in achieving the minimum of 95 percent
relative compaction (ASTM D1557-00), then this office shall be consulted for further
recommendations
Soil Suitability: The on-site soil materials minus any rock greater than 2 inches, debris,
expansive soils and organic matter may be used as typical fills as described in the attached
Standard Specifications for Construction of Controlled Fills (Appendix I)
Expansive Soil: Detrimentally expansive soils (Expansion Index of 31 or greater) were
observed within our exploratory excavations Foundation recommendations herein consider
these expansive soils
Imported Fill: Imported fill, if required at this site, shall be approved by our office prior to
importing Imported fill shall consist of very low to non-expansive soil (Expansion Index of 30
or less) and less than 25 percent shall pass the No 200 U S standard sieve
Surface Drainage: Surface drainage shall be directed away from structures The ponding of
water or saturation of soils should not be allowed adjacent to any of the foundations Sur^ce.
gradients of one percent for hardscaped areas and two percent for landscaped ereasShould be
• • • • • •maintained within 10 feet of any structures, wherever possible We recommenq Jjjat plantej$ ge
provided with drams and low flow irrigation systems Gutters, roof drains and* ether drainage"
devices shall discharge water away from the structure into surface drains or subsurface storm * *
drains Area drains shall be provided, as necessary
• •••• • •• • •
ar
Baum Residence
July 11,2005
Job No 513
Page 9
Earthwork: All structural fill and utility trench backfill shall be compacted to no less than 95
percent of its maximum dry density (ASTM Dl 557-00) The moisture content of very low to
non-expansive fill should be within two percent of optimum
All deleterious materials and oversized debris (greater than 2 inches in maximum
dimension) encountered must be removed and legally disposed of at a licensed disposal site
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of each soil type shall be
determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557-00
Foundation Recommendations
Footings: The dwelling shall be supported on continuous or pad spread footings To provide
more uniform support we recommend that the foundations be entirely supported on undisturbed
very dense soil Footings shall be designed with the minimum dimensions and allowable dead
plus live load soil bearing values given in the following table
Footings Established on Undisturbed Very Dense Soil
Footing
Type
Continuous
Pad
Minimum
Depth
(inches)
18
24
Minimum
Width
(inches)
15
24
Allowable
Soil Bearing!
Value (p s.*f.) ]
1500 :..
2000 .".,
The minimum depth given shall be below lowest adjacent finish grade Footings s*hall be
founded at least 12 inches into very dense soil
rr/ar
Baum Residence
July 11,2005
Job No 513
Page 10
All continuous footings shall contain adequate reinforcing bars so as to provide structural
continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities The final foundation dimensions and
reinforcing steel shall be designed by a Civil Engineer
The soil load bearing values presented above may be increased by one-third for short
term loads, including wind or seismic The soil bearing values of any proposed import soil
should be determined after its selection, but prior to importing to the site
Settlements under building loads are expected to be within tolerable limits for the
proposed dwelling
Lateral Resistance: Resistance to lateral loads may be provided by friction at the base of
the footings and floor slabs and by the passive resistance of the supporting soils Allowable
values of fnctional and passive resistance are presented in the table below The frictional and
passive resistance of the materials may be combined without reduction in determining the total
lateral resistance
Lateral Resistance Values
Soil Type
Compacted Fill
Undisturbed Soil
Coefficient
of Friction
035
045
Allowable
Passive Pressure
(psf/ft ofdeptjf)*:
350 I .'•
450 ••:•
• •
Footing Observations: Prior to the placement of reinforcing steel, all foundation
V V V
excavations shall be inspected by the Soil Engineer Footing excavations shall be cleaned of any
• •••• •
**L)en if far
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 11
loosened soil and debris before placing rebar Footing excavations should be observed and
probed for soft areas Any soft or disturbed soils shall be overexcavated prior to placement of
rebar Excavations shall not be backfilled with soil in order to make bottom of footings smooth
and level Bottom of footings should be left exposed on very dense soil
Concrete Slabs-On-Grade: If the soils are prepared as recommended in this report,
concrete slabs-on-grade may be supported entirely on very low to non-expansive compacted fill
or entirely on undisturbed very dense soil No cut/fill transitions should be allowed to occur
beneath the slabs-on-grade
To provide protection against vapor or water transmission through the building and floor
slabs, we recommend that the slabs-on-grade be underlain by a 4-mch layer of clean sand An
impermeable membrane, as described below, should be placed at the midheight of the sand layer
In areas where vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor coverings are planned or where
moisture may be determined to be detrimental to the structure's contents, we recommend that a
15-mil-thick impermeable plastic membrane (Stego Wrap or approved equal) be installed to
provide additional protection against water vapor transmission through the slab The vapOt. . ! .
barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.,^YejpcomtneW*• • •• • • •
that the membrane edges be sealed Sand screeds should be used in lieu of scr$ed*pms soaVnot
to puncture the membrane All plumbing, electrical and any other penetrationS^ioilld be'Ughtly
sealed with Stego red tape or approved equal
A low-slump concrete (4 inch maximum slump) should be used to minimize curlmg«)f •
the slabs The concrete slab should be allowed to cure properly before placing vinyl or other
.****•
ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11, 2005 Page 12
moisture-sensitive floor covering The flooring contractor should verify the moisture vapor
transmission through the slab just prior to installing floor coverings
Slab reinforcing and thickness shall be designed in accordance with the anticipated use
of and loadings on the slab and as recommended by the Civil Engineer As a minimum, we
recommend #4 bar at 18 inches on center, each way Weakened plane joint spacing and
construction joint spacing and placement shall be provided by the Civil Engineer As a
minimum, we recommend a maximum spacing of 12 feet each way and a minimum depth of
one-fourth of the slab thickness Every third bar should be discontinued at each weakened plane
joint
Transition Areas: The structure should not be allowed to straddle a cut-fill transition line
The tendency of cut and fill soils to compress differently can frequently result in differential
settlement, cracking to portions of the structure and in severe cases, structural damage To
reduce the potential for damage due to differential settlement m transition areas, we recommend
that cut areas be over- excavated to a depth of at least 1 foot below the bottom of the slab
subgrade and replaced with very low to non-expansive soil material compacted to at Ieasfc95 •
percent of its maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00)
Footing Setbacks. Where footings for structures are proposed adjacent to Jhe*tpp o• •
we recommend that a minimum horizontal setback from the outer edge of the fs&tnig to tne»
•••• • •
adjacent slope face be provided A minimum setback of eight feet from the slope'face shafljj^
maintained The building setback distance from the top of slopes may be modified by using
deepened footings Footing setback is measured from competent soil and should neglect any
^ :**•!" !!.!!.**• • * I I
• ••• • •• ••
• ••
•••••
ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 13
loose soils that may occur on the face of a slope or at the top of a slope
Active Pressure: The active soil pressure for the design of unrestrained earth retaining
structures with level backfill may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing
35 pounds per cubic foot For restrained earth retaining structures with level backfill, the active
soil pressure may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 35 pounds per
cubic foot plus a uniform pressure of 7H pounds per square foot, where H equals the height of
the backfill above the top of the footings These pressures do not consider any surcharge These
values also assume a drained backfill condition We recommend that the Geotechnical
Consultant observe all retaining wall subdrams to verify proper construction
Backfill. All wall backfill soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative
compaction Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill material The wall should
not be backfilled until the masonry or concrete wall has reached an adequate strength but not less
than 21 calendar days Cantilever retaining walls should be supported by temporary shoring
prior to placement of wall backfill The top of walls designed as restraining walls shall be
supported by the floor diaphragm prior to the placement of wall backfill I... I.
Seismic Site Categorization: The following seismic site categonzation.pasaaieters^m»ybe
....*
used for foundation design These design parameters are based on the informatroit provided «"
.... •• .
Chapter 16, Section 1636 of the 2001 California Building Code, California Code of R.....
......Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2
*•••••. • •• • •
...........
".....
fr/ar
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 14
Soil Profile Type - Sc (Table 16-J)
Near Source Factor, Na - 10 (Table 16-S)
Near Source Factor, Nv = 10 (Table 16-T)
Seismic Source Type = B (Table 16-U)
Field Explorations
Subsurface conditions beneath the proposed residence were explored by excavating
two trenches on June 25, 2005 The trenches extended to depths ranging from 21A to 7 feet
below existing grade Caving of the trench walls were not observed The exploratory excavation
locations are described as follows Trench T-l was excavated near the northwest corner of the
house, while trench T-2 was excavated on the south side of the house near the front entry
The surface reconnaissance and subsurface exploration were conducted by our soil
engineering personnel The soils are described m accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart (Plate No 1) In addition, a
verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density of consistency
are presented The density of granular material is given as either very loose, loose, medium
dense, dense or very dense The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft,
medium stiff, stiff, very stiff or hard
The sampling and logging of our exploratory excavations were performed using standard
geotechmcal methods The logs are presented on Plate No 2 and Plate No 3 Samples of typical
and representative soils were obtained and returned to our laboratory for observation and testing
ar
Soil Description
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
LEGEND
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
Group
Symbol Typical Names
A COARSEGRAINED More than half of material
is larger than No 200 sieve size
Gravels More than half of coarse fraction is
larger than No 4 sieve size but smaller than 3"
CLEAN GRAVELS
GRAVEL W/FINES
Sands More than half of coarse fraction is
smaller than No 4 sieve size
CLEAN SANDS
SANDS W/FINES
B FINEGRAINED More than half of material is
smaller than No 200 sieve size
Silts & Clays Liquid limit less than 50
Silts & Clays Liquid limit greater than SO
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
GW
GP
GM
GC
sw
SP
SM
SC
ML
CL
OL
MH
CH
OH
PT
Well graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines
Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines
Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures
Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures
Well graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines
Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines
Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures
Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures
Inorganic silts and very fine sans, rock flour, sandy silt or
clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plasticity
Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gsawfiy clays,
sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays *
Organic silty and organic silty <3ay»o5low plasticity
'I • •• • ••
• • •• • •
Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomapeous fifie^andy or silty
soils, elastic silts ... . <
Inorganic clays of high plasticity.fet .
Organic clays of medium to high plasticity
Peat and other highly organic soils
Baum Residence Page 19 Plate No 1
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
[
-
i-
-
2-
3-
-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
-
10-
11-
_
12-
13-
14-
15-SAMPLE TYPEB SOILCLASSIFICATIONSM
CL
SP
JOB NUMBER 513
TRENCH NO T-l
LOCATION NE Corner
SAMPLING
METHOD Bobcat
DESCRIPTION
ARTIFICIAL FILL TAN, SILTY FINE SAND
REDDISH DARK BROWN WEATHERED
CLAYSTONE
FORMATION TAN, FINE TO MEDIUM GRAINED
SAND
BOTTOM OF TRENCH = T
SAMPLE LEGEND
B = BULK SAMPLE
BAUM RESIDENCE APPARENTMOISTUREDAMP
DAMP
DAMP APPARENTCONSISTENCYMEDIUM
DENSE
HARD
VERY
DENSE
1
UJ
f\ S^x
..
•
1
•
DATE LOGGED 6/25/05 MOISTURECONTENT (%)....
• •RELATIVECOMPACTION %...:.
. .
i •
;
» •
f
-
-1
-
-2
-3
-
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-
-10
-".:. !•
-12. •
•
4
4
-14* •
-15
LOGGED BY DEZ
Baum Residence Page 20 Plate No 2
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
UJu_
1-
2-
-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
13-
14-
15-SAMPLE TYPESOILCLASSIFICATIONSM
SM
JOB NUMBER 513
TRENCH NO T-2
LOCATION At Entry
SAMPLING
METHOD Hand
DESCRIPTION
ARTIFICIAL FILL - SILTY, FINE GRAINED SAND
FORMATION - TAN FINE TO MEDIUM GRAINED
SAND
BOTTOM OF TRENCH = 2>A'
BAUM RESIDENCE APPARENTMOISTUREDAMP
DAMP APPARENTCONSISTENCYLOOSE
VERY
DENSE
1UJ
Q O
:,
.
DATE LOGGED 6/25/05 MOISTURECONTENT (%)• # • •
^ 9
I.".RELATIVECOMPACTION %»• •
• •
> • •
• •
UJU-
-1
-2
-
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
-H!
• •
-12 *
•
•
-1ST I
-14*'
-15
LOGGED BY DEZ
Baum Residence Page 21 Plate No 3
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Mechanical Sieve Analysis
Sample Location T-l (g>, 5'
Sieve Size Percent Passing
#4 100
#16 100
#30 100
#50 88
#100 55
#200 35 4
Baum Residence Page 22 Plate No 4
REMOVAL DEPTHS
Table I
Depth of Soil
Removal Below
Test Pit Existing Grade
Number (Feet)
T-l
T-2
It should be recognized that variations in soil conditions may occur between
exploratory excavations that will require additional or deeper removal
Rock may be encountered requiring blasting, a rock breaker, expansive grout
or other approved procedures for removal
•• • • ........ •
•••••••• * •
Baum Residence Page 23 Plate No 5
Baum Residence
July 11,2005 Job No 513
Page 24
APPENDIX I
• •
Baum Residence
July 11,2005
Job No 513
Page 25
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTROLLED FILLS
General Description: The construction of controlled fills shall consist of adequate geotechmcal
investigations, and clearing, removal of existing structures and foundations, preparation of land
to be filled, excavation of earth and rock from cut area, compaction and control of the fill, and all
other work necessary to complete the grading of the filled area to conform with the lines, grades,
and slopes as shown on the accepted plans
Cleanng and Preparation of Areas to be Filled:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
All fill control projects shall have an investigation or a visual examination,
depending upon the nature of the job, performed by a qualified soil
engineer prior to grading
All timber, trees, brush, vegetation, and other rubbish shall be removed,
piled and burned, or otherwise disposed of to leave the prepared area with
a finished appearance free from unsightly debris
Any soft, swampy or otherwise unsuitable areas, shall be corrected by
drainage or removal of compressible material, or both, to the depths
indicated on the plans or as directed by the soil engineer
The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support
of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scanfied to a depth of at least
six inches (6") or deeper as specified by the soil engineer, and until the
surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which
would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used •
No fill shall be placed until the prepared native ground has beeivapjpreved
by the soil engineer • • •
• •• ••
Where fills are made on the hillsides with slopes greater than 5 .., •
(horizontal) to 1 (vertical), horizontal benches shall be cut into fim •*
undisturbed natural ground to provide lateral and vertical stability *Tlfe
initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 10 feet in width'onYirm
undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the toe stake The soil
engineer shall determine the width and frequency of all succeeding
benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of
slope
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 26
(g) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall be brought to the
proper moisture content and compacted to not less than 90% of maximum
density, A S T M D1557-00
(h) Expansive soils may require special compaction specifications as directed
in the report of geotechnical investigation by the soil engineer
(i) The cut portions of building pads may require excavation and recompac-
tion for density compatibility with the fill as directed by the soil engineer
Materials' The fill soils shall consist of select materials graded so that at least 40 percent of the
material passes the No 4 sieve The material may be obtained from the excavation, a borrow pit,
or by mixing soils from one or more sources The matenal used shall be free from vegetable
matter, and other deletenous substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps greater than 6
inches in diameter If excessive vegetation, rocks, or soils with unacceptable physical
characteristics are encountered, these matenals shall be disposed of in waste areas designated on
the plans or as directed by the soil engineer If soils are encountered during the grading
operation which were not reported in the report of geotechnical investigation, further testing will
be required to ascertain their engineering properties Any special treatment recommended in the
preliminary or subsequent soil reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these
specifications
No matenal of perishable, spongy, or otherwise unstable nature shall be used in the fills
Placing, Spreading and Compacting Fill Material'
•(a) The selected fill matenal shall be placed in layers which shall not exceed •
six inches (6") when compacted Each layer shall be spread evaaty «ad •
shall be thoroughly blade-mixed during the spreading to insure nnifbnmty
of material and moisture in each layer I •"•
*•
v v v *
(b) When the moisture content of the fill matenal is below that specified* by
the soil engineer, water shall be added until the moisture content t£ hear
optimum as determined by the soil engineer to assure thorough b'ondmg
during the compacting process
• ... <
. •••• • I• • •
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 27
(c) When the moisture content of the fill matenal is above that specified by
the soil engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by bladmg and
scarifying, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is near
optimum as determined by the soil engineer
(d) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be
thoroughly compacted to not less than the specified maximum density in
accordance with A S T M Dl 557-00 Compaction shall be by means of
tamping or sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or
other types of rollers Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able
to compact over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient passes
to obtain the desired density The entire area to be filled shall be
compacted to the specified density
(e) Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other
suitable equipment Compacting operations shall be continued until the
slopes are stable and until there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on
the slopes Compacting of the slopes shall be accomplished by
backrolling the slopes in increments of 3 to 5 feet in elevation gam or by
other methods producing satisfactory results
(f) Field density tests shall be made by the soil engineer for approximately
each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not to exceed two feet in
vertical height between tests The location of the tests in plan shall be
spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther
than 100 feet apart Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for
each two feet in elevation again The soil engineer may take additional
tests as considered necessary to check on the uniformity of compaction ••••!•
Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken in the .. .
compacted material below the disturbed surface No additionaUajaare of • *••*
fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified *
density has been obtained I •'•
(g) The fill operation shall be continued in six inch (6") compacted layers, as *•• • •*!...
specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes dhd ^*. * ..
grades as shown on the accepted plans *.•••* ••••••
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 28
Supervision: Supervision by the soil engineer shall be made during the filling and compacting
operations so that he/she can certify that the fill was made in accordance with accepted
specifications
The specifications and soil testing of subgrade, subbase, and base materials for roads, or other
public property shall be done in accordance with specifications of the governing agency
Seasonal Limits* No fill matenal shall be placed, spread, or rolled during unfavorable weather
conditions When the work is interrupted by heavy ram, grading shall not be resumed until field
tests by the soil engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as
previously specified In the event that, in the opinion of the engineer, soils unsatisfactory as
foundation matenal are encountered, they shall not be incorporated m the grading, and
disposition will be made at the engineer's discretion
•••• . . •t . • ...•• • •• • .
••••.......... ;••••;
Baum Residence
July 11,2005 Job No 513
Page 29
APPENDIX II
•• ••
Baum Residence Job No 513
July 11,2005 Page 30
REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known
Active Fault Near Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada,
International Conference of Building Officials
Greensfelder, R W, 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in
California, Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23
Kennedy, M P , 1975, Geology of The San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, California
Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200
Kennedy, M P and Welday, E E, 1980, Regency and Character of Faulting Offshore
Metropolitan San Diego, San Diego, California Division of Mines and Geology, Map
Sheet 40
Moore, G W , and Kennedy, M P , 1975, Quaternary Faults at San Diego Bay California, U S
Geological Survey, Journal Research, Vol 3, pp 589-595
Rockwell, T K 1989, Holocene Activity of the Rose Canyon Fault in San Diego Based on
Trenching Studies Evidence ofM6+ Surface Rupturing Earthquakes, in The Seismic
Risk in the San Diego Region Special Focus on the Rose Canyon Fault System
Seed, H B and Idnss, I M , 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes,
EERI Monograph Series
Slemmons, D B , 1979, Evaluation of Geomorphic Features of Active Faults for Engineering
Design and Siting Studies, Association of Engineering Geologists Short Course !...!•
Tan, S And Kennedy, M P, 1996, Geologic Maps for the Northwestern Part ofAau J)ieg& *••" ;••:*:
County, California California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File keport 96-02 *.. I. I
Terzaghi, Karl and Peck, Ralph B , 1948, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practic&JlohnWilsy, ^
and Sons, Inc *.5 .* *••*•* .••
Weber, Harold F Jr, 1982, Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides,
The North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California California Divisioiuof ••
Mines and Geology, Report 82-12 "••" •
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form
Project Name
Building Permit
Plan Check Number
Project Address
APN
Project Applicant
(Owner Name)
Project Description
Building Type
Residential
TuJUp
-QO
D
a
Number of New Dwelling Units
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling
Second Dwelling Unit Square Feet of Living Area in SOU
Residential Additions Net Square Feet New Area <Q\0\
Commercial/Industrial Square Feet Floor Area
City Certification of .A
Applicant Information c/\OUUi\A,Date IQ\
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
Carlsbad Unified School District
6225 El Cammo Real
Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000)
Encmitas Union School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Encmitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166)
San Marcos Unified School District
215MataWay
San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649)
Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt Only)
San Dieguito Union High School District
710 Encmitas Blvd
Encmitas, CA 92024 (753-6491)
Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the
information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended
certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and
that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner
Signature Date
Revised 4/20/00
1635 Faraday Avenue •
Building Counter
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700
• (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 6O2-8558
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school distnct(s))**************************************************
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that
the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school
mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
TITLE GAYLEN FREEMAN
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE CARLSBAD^ CA920W
PHONE NUMBER
Revised 4/20/00
j [ CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ( j JEFFERSON ELEMENTARV | \ AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY
[ | CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL | J MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY \ [ AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL
[ | CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY [ ] CALAVERA HILLS SCHOOL \ \FHCIFICRIM
| [ VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL j J KELL FV SCHOOL [ | CALAVERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
I \BUeNAVISnsCHClOL [ ~~| HOPE SCHOOL [ | OTHER
RECEIVED FROM
(It Applicable) PARENT OR
0ajuur DATE
Receipt No
19076
AMOUNT
RECEIVED BY CASH __.CHECK TOTAL
Sep Ju uo
7107 Broadway, <Q16
Lemon Grove, CA 91945
September 29,2005
Mr Ray Bum
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
Project Job No 513
Baum Residence
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
Subject. Review of Construction Documents
Dear Mr Baum
In accordance with your request, we have completed a review of the Foundation Plan and
Details Sheet for the proposed project. We are presenting to you, herewith, our findings
We have reviewed the Foundation Plan (Sheet S-t) and the Details (Sheet S-4) We have
determined that the recommendations in our Geotechmcal Investigation Report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents of August, 2005. and prepared by S"*vn
Engineering with certain exceptions noted below
C6
Baum Residence
September 29,2005
Job No 513
Page 2
1 The slab note on the Foundation Plan (shown in 2 places) shall be changed from #3 to #4
and 6 mil visqueen to IS mil Stego Wrap, or equal (no known equal)
2 The tame shall apply for the slab note in details A/S-1, B/S-1, l/S-4 and 2/S-4
If you bave any questions after reviewing the findings contained in the attached plan
review report, please do not hesitate to contact this office
Respectfully sobnutted,
Dennis E. Znnmennag.lCE 26676, GE 928, Expires 3/31/06
Geotcchntcal Engineer
Attachments
Distribution (3) Addressee
DEZmb
B>tso D O COCO < I- LUo CQ —
vn
c°
V
T
i
A'
A4
"2
Q)
0
^"Q)"5, c £
o ^
• v
eJ
%^2.
04-02-2007
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR07040
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address
Permit Type
Parcel No
Valuation
Reference #
Project Title
1014 TULIP WYCBAD
PCR
2144101200 Lot#
$0 00 Construction Type
CB05-2057
BAUM RESIDENCE
REVISE STRUCTURAL PAGES &CALCS
0
NEW
Status
Applied
Entered By
Plan Approved
Issued
Inspect Area
Applicant
BAUM RAYMOND C
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92011
Owner
BAUM RAYMOND C
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92011
ISSUED
02/23/2007
MDP
04/02/2007
04/02/2007
Plan Check Revision Fee
Additional Fees
$900 00
$000
Total Fees $900 00 Total Payments To Date $900 00 Balance Due $000
Inspector
FINAL APPROVAL
Date Clearance
NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack
review set aside void or annul their imposition
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired
PERMIT APPLICATION
r"*
;C5ITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
'1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008
1 PROJECT INFORMATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO
EST VAL
Plan Ck Deposit
Validated By
Date
y I
/
Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units
Assessor s Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use
K
^
DescriptJO/J of Work^L<X
2 CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant)
/-\
VB
#of Stones # c/ Bedrooms # of Bathrooms
Name f^lVV P-AO^IAddress /C/ V i City
3 APPLICANT tZ) Contractor O Agent for Contractor £9 Owner Q Agent for Owner
State/Zip t*fs/f Telephone #Fax #
Name
4 PROPERTY OWNER
Address City State/Zip Telephone #
Aritiress
o uura i nMi> i un uuivirMnT IMMIVIC \ «> >y ^*~* SF'A/'A -^~»
(Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Cod^TCny""Cily~or CoJnt^Kwnich retjui
City State/Zip Telephone #Name
5 CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME
to construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its
issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law
IChapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged
exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars |$500|)
Name
State License #
Address
License Class
City State/Zip
City Business License #
Telephone #
Designer Name
State License #
Address City State/Zip Telephone
6 WORKERS COMPENSATION
Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations
l~1 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued
f~l I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are
Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California
WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100 000} in addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney s fees
SIGNATURE DATE
7 OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason
f~l I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does
such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale)
f~l I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The
Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor s License Law)
[~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason
1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement O YES |~|NO
2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work
3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number)
4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number)
5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work)
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act7 D YES Q NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district' d YES Q NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES Q NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
8 CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code)
LENDER S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES
JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT
OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5 0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
. . at any tims after the work is commf»«e^d for a peood of 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code)
^t APPLICAM i S SIGNATURE \V C*~-f p-^ DATE -2 '22 ~0 1
^ ^ WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance
EsGil Corporation
• -- =— In Partnership untfi. government for Quitting Safety
DATE March 22, 2007
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLANREVIEWER
-^3" hlLt
PLAN CHECK NO PCR07-40(05-2057.REV) SET IV
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Structural Rev. for Baum Residence Addition/Remodel
• The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Telephone #
Date contacted (by ) Fax #
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS
By Kurt Culver for B.D Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
GA D MB D EJ D PC 3/21/07
tmsmtl dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In {Partners/up vnth government for 'BuiCding Safety
DATE March 21, 2007 a APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR07-40(05-2057 REV) SET II
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Structural Rev. for Baum Residence Addition/Remodel
I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
I | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
H The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff dud not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Telephone # 760 931 6797
Date contacted 3A//6^by^^ ) Fax# 760722-3148
Mail v Telephone Fax i/ln Person
REMARKS
By Kurt Culver for B.D. Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA n MB D EJ D PC 3/19/07
trnsmtl dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCRO7-4O(O5-2057 REV)
March 21, 2007
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
2057 REV)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 3/19/07
REVIEWED BY Kurt Culver for B D.
PLAN CHECK NO PCRO7-40(05-
SET II
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
March 21, 2007
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
B The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
C Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list9
QYes GNo
Carlsbad PCR07-40(05-2057 REV)
March 21, 2007
Note The following unresolved issues were discussed with the engineer on 3/20/07
EsGil Corporation is awaiting revised plans and calculations, as agreed upon by the
engineer
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-
2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete
2 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or
architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will havo a doforrod submittal
(trussos. otc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, por UBC Soc
106312
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall bo submitted to tho architect or
engineer of record, who shall review them and forward thorn to tho building official with a
notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have boen roviowed and that
they have boon found to be in general conformance with the design of tho building Tho
deferred submittal itoms shall NOT bo installed until thoir design and submittal
documents have boon approved by the building official"
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
A All now residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report An update letter is
required if the report is moro than 3 years old—If a room addition is less than 1000 sq ft in
area and only one story, then a soils report is not required
§ Provide a copy of tho project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil
engmoor The report shall include foundation design recommondations based on the
Carlsbad PCRO7-40(05-2057 REV)
March 21, 2007
ongmoer's findings and shall comply with DBG Section 1804
€ In Soismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a noar-source factor Identify this value in
the soils report and on the plans—Section 1629 4 2
7 Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in
Soismic Zones 3 and 4—This does not apply to detached, single-story dwellings Section
18045
S Note on tho plan tho soils classification, whothor or not tho soil is oxpansivo and noto tho
allowable bearing value Section 106 3 3
8 Provide a letter from tho soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan
and specifications have been reviewed and that it has boen dotormmod that the
rocommendations in the soils report aro properly incorporated into the construction
documents (when required by tho soil report)
• FRAMING
40 Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project Specify truss identification
numbers on tho plans Or submit a doforral PLEASE SEE ITEM 3 ABOVE
44 PLEASE Show DETAIL FOR THE drag TRUSS CONNECTION TO THE RESPECTIVE
RESISTING ELEMENTS PLEASE CROSS REFERENCE THE SAME TO THE
FRAMING PLANS PLEASE SEE THE DRAG TRUSSES SHOWN ON THE LINE 3 4
ON SHEET S-3 1
42- IT SEEMS THAT THE RB13 WALL LINE WOULD BE DRAGGED INTO THE RB21
SYSTEM PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAIL OF SUCH DRAG SYSTEM ON THE
PLANS AND CROSS REFERENCED TO THE FRAMING PLAN
13 THE LINES B & 5 LATERAL LOAD OF THE UPPER LEFT ROOF SEEMS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE LOWER ROOF LOAD PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LINES ALSO
THIS COMMENT MAY AFFECT THE DIAPHRAGMS, CHORDS AND THE SHEAR
WALLS ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION
44 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE DIAPHRAGM & DIAPHRAGM CHORDS
CALCULATIONS
15 LINE E MAY NEED A DRAG COLLECTOR TO TRANSMIT THE TRIBUTARY LOAD
SHOWN ON SHEET S3 1 AS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS PLEASE SHOW
CONNECTION DETAIL OF SUCH DRAG SYSTEM ON THE PLANS AND CROSS
REFERENCED TO THE FRAMING PLAN
46 A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK WHEN ALL THE ITEMS ABOVE ARE MET
Carlsbad PCR07-40(05-2057.REV)
March 21, 2007
• MISCELLANEOUS
47 Ploaso SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOUNDATIONS TO VERIFY THE
OVERTURNING EFFECT OF THE LATERAL LOAD TO THE SOILS BEARING
CAPACITY
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact BERT DOMINGO at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGii Corporation
In Partnership with government for <Buihfmg Safety
DATE March 6, 2OO7 a APPIJCANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR07-40(05-2057.REV) SET I
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Structural Rev. for Baum Residence Addition/ Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Telephone # 760 931 6797/ / /
Date contacted 3n/<f](^.^-^S) Fax # 760 722-3148
Mail Telephone {/"Fax Hn Person
REMARKS
By Bert Domingo Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
GA D MB D EJ D PC 2/23/07
trnsmtl dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCR07-40(05-2057 REV)
March 6, 2007
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
2057 REV)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 2/23/07
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO PCR07-4O(05-
SET I
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
March 6, 2007
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Carlsbad PCRO7-40(05-2O57 REV)
March 6, 2007
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-
2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by
the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is
complete
2 Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or
architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal
(trusses, etc ) Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per UBC Sec
106342
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or
engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a
notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that
they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building The
deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal
documents have been approved by the building official"
• FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
4 All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report An update letter is
required if the report is more than 3 years old If a room addition is less than 1000 sq ft in
area and only one story, then a soils report is not required
5 Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil
engineer The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the
engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804
6 In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor Identify this value in
the soils report and on the plans Section 1629 4 2
Carlsbad PCRO7-40(O5-2O57.REV)
March 6, 20O7
7 Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in
Seismic Zones 3 and 4 This does not apply to detached, single-story dwellings Section
18045
8 Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the
allowable bearing value Section 106 3 3
9 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan
and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the
recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction
documents (when required by the soil report)
• FRAMING
10 Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project Specify truss identification
numbers on the plans Or submit a deferral PLEASE SEE ITEM 3 ABOVE
11 PLEASE Show DETAIL FOR THE drag TRUSS CONNECTION TO THE RESPECTIVE
RESISTING ELEMENTS PLEASE CROSS REFERENCE THE SAME TO THE
FRAMING PLANS PLEASE SEE THE DRAG TRUSSES SHOWN ON THE LINE 3 4
ON SHEET S-3 1
12 IT SEEMS THAT THE RB13 WALL LINE WOULD BE DRAGGED INTO THE RB21
SYSTEM PLEASE SHOW CONNECTION DETAIL OF SUCH DRAG SYSTEM ON THE
PLANS AND CROSS REFERENCED TO THE FRAMING PLAN
13 THE LINES B & 5 LATERAL LOAD OF THE UPPER LEFT ROOF SEEMS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE LOWER ROOF LOAD PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LINES ALSO
THIS COMMENT MAY AFFECT THE DIAPHRAGMS, CHORDS AND THE SHEAR
WALLS ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION
14 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE DIAPHRAGM & DIAPHRAGM CHORDS
CALCULATIONS
15 LINE E MAY NEED A DRAG COLLECTOR TO TRANSMIT THE TRIBUTARY LOAD
SHOWN ON SHEET S3 1 AS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS PLEASE SHOW
CONNECTION DETAIL OF SUCH DRAG SYSTEM ON THE PLANS AND CROSS
REFERENCED TO THE FRAMING PLAN
16 A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK WHEN ALL THE ITEMS ABOVE ARE MET
• MISCELLANEOUS
17 Please SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOUNDATIONS TO VERIFY THE
OVERTURNING EFFECT OF THE LATERAL LOAD TO THE SOILS BEARING
CAPACITY
Carlsbad PCR07-40(05-2O57 REV)
March 6, 2O07
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact BERT DOMINGO at Esgil Corporation Thank you
Carlsbad PCR07-40(05-2057 REV)
March 6, 2O07
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCR07-4O(O5
2057.REV)
PREPARED BY Bert Domingo DATE March 6, 2007
BUILDING ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
BUILDING OCCUPANCY r3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN
BUILDING
PORTION
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdiction Code
AREA
(Sq Ft)
cb
Rlrln Pprmit FPP hu Orrfmsnrp 1 ^
Valuation
Multiplier
By Ordinance
Reg
Mod
VALUE ($)
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $900 001
Type of Review
Repetitive FeeRepeats
D Complete Review
D Other
m Hourly 75
Structural Only
Hours
Esgil Plan Review Fee $720 00
* Based on hourly rate
Comments
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue doc
Servln Engineering* Inc.
2382 Cammo Vida Roble, Suite F
Carlsbad, CA 92011
(760)931-1792, Fax (760)931-1892
Email nservmffi.servin-engmeering com
February 21,2007
Esgil Corporation
9230 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208
San Diego, California 92123
Attention Kurt Culver
858-560-1468, 858-560-1576 Fax
Regarding PCF06-116 (Original 05-2057) 1014 Tulip for Ray Baum, Remodel and addition
Dear Kurt
I'd like to express my gratitude and pleasure on the last review that Burt Domingo did on this project I'm
sure that we won't have that problem again
The reason for this letter is two fold, 1) The owner wants to make a change on the structure after speaking
with his contractor and consulting with us regarding the increased costs due to the last change, 2) Provide
you with a bnef descnption of the proposed change
In the last revision we placed some steel columns to transfer the lateral loading to the lower floor and
foundation system In this revision, we've kept one moment frame and proposed to eliminate the steel
columns providing lateral restraint for the middle diaphragm This is accomplished by providing the shear
walls along the affected grid lines with proper shear transfer to the lower diaphragms and shear walls
The attached revision summary itemizes the essence of this project change Again, its due to the limited
budget and delays for my client We've made the revisions to comply with his wishes and his contractor's
suggestions in compliance with the building code
Please review these suggestions and comments if necessary As always, your review process is excellent and
efficient We welcome your suggestions
Sincerely yours,
NICK SERVIN, PE, Principal Engineer #33538
\\S ervmeng\data\j ohn\D\Jobs\Tuhp\Esgil2 wpd
Revision Summary
• Replace the steel cantilever columns along grid lines 2, 3, B, &D with plywood
shearwalls at the two curve walls
• The curve wall along grid line 2 is a balloon frame wall (24ft) with 2x8 studs that resist
the shear from the upper roof and two HD8A holdowns are provided
• The curve wall along grid line 3 and B is a 5ft shearwall that resist the shear from the
upper roof and is supported by two 4x10 beams with the walls strapped to the beams The
beams are connected to the post with Simpson column caps (CCQ series) That transfers
down to the foundation with the post at the foundation being held down with HD5A
holdowns
• The curve wall along gnd line 3 and D is an 8ft shearwall that resist the shear from the
upper roof and is supported by a 4x10 beam and a 5 1/4" x 16" parallam beam The wall
is strapped to the beams with Simpson cmstc!6 straps and the beams are connected to the
post with Simpson column caps (CCQ series) At the foundation the post are held down
with HD5A holdowns
Summary
These shearwalls are to replace the steel cantilever columns These shearwalls are to resist the
shear at the upper roof The left lower roof diaphragm and the right lower roof diaphragm are
resisted by its own lateral force resisting system
^Sr•^-^^'^"?GN^TJsr r*-o T i — o ;c CD ^S. o m > 2S Jo < c §
05 S i|
03
m
m
oo
Im
Cfl
>
5
12-14-2006
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR06116
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address
Permit Type
Parcel No
Valuation
Reference #
Project Title
1014 TULIP WYCBAD
PCR
2144101200 Lot# 0
$0 00 Construction Type VN
BAUM RES-REV ERROR-IN REAR SET
Status
Applied
Entered By
Plan Approved
Issued
Inspect Area
EXTEND 2ND STORY IN FRONT TO LINE UP W/1ST FLOOR
Applicant
BAUM RAYMOND C
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92011
Owner
BAUM RAYMOND C
1014 TULIP WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92011
ISSUED
07/03/2006
RMA
12/14/2006
12/14/2006
Plan Check Revision Fee
Additional Fees
$960 00
$000
Total Fees $960 00 Total Payments To Date $960 00 Balance Due $000
Inspector
FINAL APPROVAL
Date Clearance
NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack
review set aside void or annul their imposition
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK
Plan Ck Deposit
Validated By r
PROJECT INFORMATION
Business Name (at this address)Address (include Bldg/Suite it)
Subdivision Name/NumberLegal Description
Assessor s Parcel #
,101*4 Tuh
Name
3 APPLICANT Q Contractor
Address ' d City
Agent for^ Contractor D Owner fj Agent for Owner
Fax #
Name
4 PROPERTY OWNER
Address City State/Zip Telephone ff
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
5 CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME , - "" *i -
(Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its
issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law
[Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged
exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001)
Name
State License #
Address
License Class
City State/Zip
City Business License #
Telephone tt
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License # _
6 , ..WORKERS" COMPENSAT ION ....... •* , .... ' '" , ~'": "• : ..... °' s;. . J
Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations
D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued
C] I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are
Insurance Company _ Policy No _ Expiration Date _
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
n CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California
WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100 000) in addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney s fees
SIGNATURE _ ______ __ __ DATE _
7 -OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION ; ..* " i h »
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason
n I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec 7044 Business and Professions Cods The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does
such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale)
CD I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The
Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor s License Law)
CD I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code tor this reason
YES1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement
2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work
3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number)
4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number) ___ __
5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
gf work) _
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY , : > , * ;
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? O YES Q NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district' Q YES Q NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES Q NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
8 CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY i
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(0 Civil Code)
LENDER S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS
9 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ; : ~ ~~ \ '• :'
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES
JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT
OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5 0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is commenced for rfj^i&nA 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code)
APPLICANT S SIGNATURE V
WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance
DATE
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, CA 92011
June 28, 2006
Re Revisions to Permit # CB05-2057
To Whom It May Concern
I have severed my relationship with Bill Perry architect of record on
the above reference remodel of my home
I assume all responsibility for the design changes as of this date John
Gomez of J-Tek design was employed as a draftsman only, and made
changes to the design on my request The engineer, Servin Engineering,
remains the same
Thank you for taking the time to review my revision plans
Sincerely,
Ray Baum
Owner
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way
Carlsbad, CA 92011
Regarding Revisions to plans permit #CB05-2507
The overall concept of the project remains the same but some things had to
be corrected in order to build the house Therefore, at first glance it may be
hard to see the differences between the old and the new Because the
architect basically did everything on just three pages, we decided to just add
submittal pages to correct the onginal work For instance, we could not just
replace the first floor plan as it was also the electrical page We have added
extra pages to show the new dimensions and layout Because the original
work needed structural revisions we had Servm Engineering, the original
engineers, go though and recalculate the entire project These revisions
include new plans, revised set of calculations, and a new title 24 Besides a
few cosmetic changes there were only two areas that needed changing
1 The architect of record refused to change the radius of the stairwell
Consequently the stairwell tower encroached into the rear set back by
over a foot We have reduced the radius of the rear tower which also
made the two adjacent rear walls slightly longer
2 The next problem that we could not get the architect to address was
the second story on the front of the house It was set to far back over
the first floor If one walked to the front door, and looked up from the
inside, you would see sky rather than the second floor Obviously we
had to change the radius of the front tower to match the radius of the
rear tower We then moved the front walls of the second story
forward to cover the first floor, also allowing the bathrooms to share
a common wall for water, waste, and venting
Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this submittal
Respectfully,
Ray Baum
Property Owner
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with government for (RmCtfing Safety
DATE December 8, 2006 a APPLICANT
B JURIS
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116(Orig.O5-2057) SET IX
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baums SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Telephone #
Date contacted (by ) Fax #
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
[El REMARKS 1) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO COMPLETE THE SPECIAL
INSPECTION FORM(CAISSONS, WELDING, SOILS EPOXY, ETC) 2) PLEASE HAVE THE
DESIGNER SLIP SHEET THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO THE CITY SET VII
By Bert Domingo Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/5/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with government for (Building Safety
DATE November 30, 2006
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057) SET VIII
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
OPET^TREVIEWER
a FILE
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum Telephone # 760-931-6797
Date contacted l2./i/ofc(by ££. ) Fax # 760-722-3148
Mail Telephone ^ Fax *-^ln Person
I REMARKS
By Bert Domingo
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ
Enclosures
PC 11/20/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Ong.05-2057)
November 30, 2006
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
(Orig.O5-2057)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 11/20/06
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO PCRO6-116
SET VIII
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
November 30, 2006
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Ong.05-2057)
November 30, 2OO6
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California
state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify
expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code) THIS
WILL BE CHECKED WHEN ALL THE ITEMS BELOW ARE MET
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above the living room and
stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates? But
did not show how the lateral loads will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete
analyses reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation AGAIN, PLEASE
SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS REFLECTING THE DIAPHRAGM LOADINGS AND
LOAD PATH ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
CORRECTIONS ALSO
A) THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE JUST EXAMPLE OF
CONFLICTING STRUCTURAL DATA SHOWN IN THE
CALCULATIONS AND COMPARED WITH THE ELEMENTS SHOWN
ON THE PLANS
1) THE MOMENT OF THE BASE FOR THE STEEL COLUMNS
SHOWN ON PAGE L-27 IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WAS
USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON
PAGES L-25 AND 26.
2) THE STEEL COLUMN AS A RESISTING ELEMENT LOCATED
ALONG LINE 3 25 @ LINE D AND BEING SUPPORTED BY
STEEL BEAM AT THE FLOOR LEVEL CONNECTED TO A
WOOD POST @ ONE END AND NOT CLEAR HOW IT IS
SUPPORTED ON THE OTHER END
3) THE ORIGINAL CORRECTION ITEM 3 ABOVE HAD NOT BEEN
RESPONDED TO
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.05-2057)
November 3O, 2OO6
4) A COMPLETE STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that
shown below Section 106 3 2 IT SEEMS NOT RESPONDED TO STILL NOT RESPONDED TO
THIS WILL BE CHECKED WHEN THE NEW STRUCTURAL COMMENTS WERE MET
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special
Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED'? REMARKS
FIELD WELDING
CONCRETE
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
PILES/CAISSONS
When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program
which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please
review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form IT SEEMS THAT THE FORM DID NOT
INCLUDE THE CONCRETE AND THE HS BOLTS PLEASE SEE ITEM 4 ABOVE
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership witfi government for (Bmfding Safety
DATE October 31, 2006
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig.05-2057) SET VII
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum Telephone # 760-931-6797
Date contacted //l>/b(j> (by F-A^) Fax # 760-722-3148
MaiL/- Telephone Fax^ In Person
REMARKS THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CB05-2057 WENT THRU 6 PLAN CHECKS AND
THE SAME PLANS UNDER CBPCR06-116 IS NOW GOING TO THE 8™ PLAN CHECK THE
LATERAL SYSTEM HAVE BEEN CHANGING EVERY PLAN CHECK TIME FOR THE LAST 4
PLAN CHECK SCHEDULE THIS IS BECOMING UNACCEPTABLE THE CALCULATIONS
INCLUDED IN THE LATEST SUBMITTAL IS VERY CONFUSING THE DATA SHOWN ON
PAGE L-31 ARE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON PAGE L-32 PAGE L33 IS
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DATA AND SO ON WE CAN NOT CHECK THE PLANS UNTIL
THE ENGINEER OF WORK WOULD KINDLY COME TO THIS OFFICE TO PLEASE
GUIDE/CLARIFY THE CONFUSION
By Bert Domingo Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/20/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 *• San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2057)
October 31, 2OO6
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
(Orig.O5-2O57)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 10/20/06
REVIEWED BY Bert Domingo
PLAN CHECK NO PCRO6-116
SET VII
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
October 31, 2006
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig O5-2O57)
October 31, 2006
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 PJans. specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California
state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify
expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code!
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above the living room and
stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates9 But
did not show how the lateral loads will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete
analyses reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation AGAIN, PLEASE
SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS REFLECTING THE DIAPHRAGM LOADINGS AND
LOAD PATH ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
CORRECTIONS ALSO
A) THE CALCULATIONS INDICATED WIND GOVERNS BUT THERE SEEMS NO SEISMIC
ANALYSIS WERE SUBMITTED TO COMPARE WITH IT SEEMS THAT A NEW
LATERAL SYSTEM IS BEING PROPOSED PLEASE SEE THE
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
1) THE SYSTEM ALONG LINE 2 SEEMS TO INDICATE TWO
CANTILEVERED COLUMNS PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
COMMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE
a) PAGE L12 SHOWS A MOMENT AT THE BASE OF THE
COLUMN BUT SEEMS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SUM OF
THE PRODUCT OF THE FORCES AND THE RESPECTIVE
MOMENT ARMS PLEASE CLARIFY
b) PER TABLE 16N OF THE 97 UBC, THE B OF THE SYSTEM
SHOULD BE 2 2
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2O57)
October 31, 2006
c) THERE SEEMS NO CALCULATIONS FOR THE
FOUNDATION OF THE SYSTEM TO CARRY/RESIST THE
HORIZONTAL FORCES AND THE OVERTURNING EFFECT OF
SUCH HORIZONTAL/LATERAL LOADS PLEASE SUBMIT
CALCULATIONS
d) THE ABOVE COMMENTS IS ALSO TRUE TO THE
COLUMN SHOWN ON PAGE L13
e) WITH THE APPLICATION OF THE R = 2 2 AND THE REAL
MOMENT AT THE BASE, THE BASE PLATES, ANCHOR BOLTS
AND THE FOUNDATION COULD BE AFFECTED
f) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE BOLT VALUE (ALLOWABLE)
WAS DERIVED
g) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE BOLT ANCHORAGE WOULD
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECTION 1923 OF THE
97UBC
2) PAGE L16 OF THE CALCULATIONS SHOWS A STEEL
COLUMN ALONG LINE 3 WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
LOADS AT THE TOP AND A DRAG TRUSS (FORCE?) AT 5'
BELOW THE TOP BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW EQUILIBRIUM
COULD BE ATTAINED WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN
ON A PIN - PIN CONNECTION IS THE SAME COLUMN A PART
OF THE RESISTING ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING?
3) LINE B SHOWS A SHEARWALL8( 9' LONG) AT THE LOWER
LEFT ROOF BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE TRIBUTARY
LOAD WOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO SUCH RESISTING
ELEMENT AT THE SAME LEVEL, ALONG LINE D, THERE
SEEMS NO RESISTING ELEMENT TO CARRY THE LATERAL
LOAD FROM THE UPPER ROOF TO THE FOUNDATION
4) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE CALCULATIONS AND THE
STRUCTURAL PLANS ARE CONFUSING TO MAKE A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK PROCESS
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Ong.O5-2O57)
October 31, 2OO6
5) IT SEEMS THAT THE ORIGINAL CORRECTION ITEM 3 ABOVE
HAD NOT BEEN RESPONDED TO
6) A COMPLETE STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE
7) AGAIN THE LATERAL SYSTEM OF THE BUILDING HAS BEEN
CHANGING SO MANY TIMES MAY CHARGE ADDITIONAL
FEE AGAIN
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that
shown below Section 106 3 2 IT SEEMS NOT RESPONDED TO STILL NOT RESPONDED TO
THIS WILL BE CHECKED WHEN THE NEW STRUCTURAL COMMENTS WERE MET
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special
Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED'? REMARKS
FIELD WELDING
SPECIAL MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS
(SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY)
CONCRETE
HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
When special inspection is required the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program
which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please
review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form IT SEEMS THAT THE FORM DID NOT
INCLUDE THE CONCRETE AND THE HS BOLTS PLEASE SEE ITEM 4 ABOVE
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig O5-2057)
October 31, 20O6
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGii Corporation
In Partnership with government for (Buibting Safety
DATE October 6, 2006 a APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad /a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057) SET VI
PROJECT ADDRESS 1O14 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum Telephone # 760-931-6797
Date contacted (Mfy (by fl^) Fax # 760-722-3148
Mail"—Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS AN ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK FEE IS ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT
BECAUSE THE LATERAL SYSTEM HAVE BEEN CHANGING EVERY PLAN CHECK TIME
FOR THE LAST 3 PLAN CHECK SCHEDULE
By Bert Domingo Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 9/14/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Ong.O5-2O57)
October 6, 2006
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116
(Ong.O5-2O57)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way SET VI
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
ESGIL CORPORATION 9/14/06 October 6, 20O6
REVIEWED BY Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Elizarraras
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
UYes QNo
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2O57)
October 6, 2O06
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed bvthe California
state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify
expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above the living room and
stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates'? But
did not show how the lateral loads will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete
analyses reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation AGAIN, PLEASE
SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS REFLECTING THE DIAPHRAGM LOADINGS AND
LOAD PATH ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
CORRECTIONS ALSO
•f-,
A) THE CALCULATIONS INDICATED WIND GOVERNS BUT THERE SEEMS NO SEISMIC
ANALYSIS WERE SUBMITTED TO COMPARE WITH IT SEEMS THAT A NEW
LATERAL SYSTEM IS BEING PROPOSED PLEASE SEE THE
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
1) THE SYSTEM ALONG LINE 2 SEEMS TO INDICATE TWO
CANTILEVERED COLUMNS PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
COMMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE
a) PAGE L12 SHOWS A MOMENT AT THE BASE OF THE
COLUMN BUT SEEMS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SUM OF
THE PRODUCT OF THE FORCES AND THE RESPECTIVE
MOMENT ARMS PLEASE CLARIFY
b) PER TABLE 16N OF THE 97 UBC, THE R OF THE SYSTEM
SHOULD BE 2 2
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.05-2O57)
October 6, 2006
c) THERE SEEMS NO CALCULATIONS FOR THE
FOUNDATION OF THE SYSTEM TO CARRY/RESIST THE
HORIZONTAL FORCES AND THE OVERTURNING EFFECT OF
SUCH HORIZONTAL/LATERAL LOADS PLEASE SUBMIT
CALCULATIONS
d) THE ABOVE COMMENTS IS ALSO TRUE TO THE
COLUMN SHOWN ON PAGE L13
e) WITH THE APPLICATION OF THE R = 2 2 AND THE REAL
MOMENT AT THE BASE, THE BASE PLATES, ANCHOR BOLTS
AND THE FOUNDATION COULD BE AFFECTED
f) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE BOLT VALUE (ALLOWABLE)
WAS DERIVED
g) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE BOLT ANCHORAGE WOULD
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECTION 1923 OF THE
97UBC
2) PAGE L16 OF THE CALCULATIONS SHOWS A STEEL
COLUMN ALONG LINE 3 WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
LOADS AT THE TOP AND A DRAG TRUSS (FORCE?) AT 5'
BELOW THE TOP BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW EQUILIBRIUM
COULD BE ATTAINED WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN
ON A PIN - PIN CONNECTION IS THE SAME COLUMN A PART
OF THE RESISTING ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING?
3) LINE B SHOWS A SHEARWALL8( 9' LONG) AT THE LOWER
LEFT ROOF BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE TRIBUTARY
LOAD WOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO SUCH RESISTING
ELEMENT AT THE SAME LEVEL, ALONG LINE D, THERE
SEEMS NO RESISTING ELEMENT TO CARRY THE LATERAL
LOAD FROM THE UPPER ROOF TO THE FOUNDATION
4) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE CALCULATIONS AND THE
STRUCTURAL PLANS ARE CONFUSING TO MAKE A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK PROCESS
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig O5-2057)
October 6, 2OO6
5) IT SEEMS THAT THE ORIGINAL CORRECTION ITEM 3 ABOVE
HAD NOT BEEN RESPONDED TO
6) A COMPLETE STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK WILL BE MADE
7) AGAIN THE LATERAL SYSTEM OF THE BUILDING HAS BEEN
CHANGING SO MANY TIMES MAY CHARGE ADDITIONAL
FEE AGAIN
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that
shown below Section 106 3 2 IT SEEMS NOT RESPONDED TO STILL NOT RESPONDED TO
THIS WILL BE CHECKED WHEN THE NEW STRUCTURAL COMMENTS WERE MET
. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special
Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED'? REMARKS
FIELD WELDING
SPECIAL MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS
(SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY)
CONCRETE
HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program
which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please
review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form IT SEEMS THAT THE FORM DID NOT
INCLUDE THE CONCRETE AND THE HS BOLTS PLEASE SEE ITEM 4 ABOVE
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057)
October 6, 2006
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig O5-2O57)
October 6, 2006
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
(Ong.O5-2O57)
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116
PREPARED BY Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Elizarraras
October 6, 2006
BUILDING ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN
DATE
BUILDING
PORTION
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdiction Code
AREA
(Sq Ft)
cb
Rlrin Pprmif FPP hu Orrlmanrp 'W
Valuation
Multiplier
By Ordinance
Reg
Mod
VALUE ($)
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance
Type of Review D Complete Review
$600 00
L~] Repetitive Fee~y-_H Repeats
D Other
r-i Hourly
Structural Only
Hours
Esgil Plan Review Fee $480 00
* Based on hourly rate
Comments
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue doc
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with government for (BuiCcfing Safety
DATE September 21, 2006
JURIS
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057) SET V
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
| | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
I | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
[XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
[X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
[XJ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum Telephone # 760-931-6797/ / fl X5
Date contacted^/Z^o^ (by&=$ Fax # 760-722-3148
Mail Telephone Fax l/ln Person
REMARKS
By Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Ehzarraras
Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 9/14/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2057)
September 21, 2OO6
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116
(Orig 05-2O57)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way SET V
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
ESGIL CORPORATION 9/14/06 September 21, 2O06
REVIEWED BY Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Elizarraras
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Cai-lsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2O57)
September 21, 2OO6
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed bv the California
state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify
expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above the living room and
stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates7 But
did not show how the lateral loads will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete
analyses reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation AGAIN. PLEASE
SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS REFLECTING THE DIAPHRAGM LOADINGS AND
LOAD PATH ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
CORRECTIONS ALSO
A) THE CALCULATIONS INDICATED WIND GOVERNS BUT THERE SEEMS NO SEISMIC
ANALYSIS WERE SUBMITTED TO COMPARE WITH
a) PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE LATERAL LOADS TO
VERIFY CRITICAL LOADINGS AS PRESCRIBED BY THE SECTION 1612 OF
THE 97 UBC
b) FOR ORDINARY MOMENT FRAME FOR STEEL THE R VALUE SHOULD
BE 4 5 AND NOT 5 5
c) THE DETAIL 5/S-6 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE REQUIRED SHEAR
WALL TO TRANSFER THE DIAPHRAGM LOAD TO THE MOMENT FRAME
d) IT SEEMS THAT THE TRUSS CONNECTED TO THE MOMENT FRAME
COULD BE A DRAG TRUSS PLEASE INDICATE ON THE FRAMING PLAN
THE REQUIRED DRAG FORCE FOR THE SAME TRUSS
el IT SEEMS THAT THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE MOMENT
FRAME IS EXCEEDING THE REQUIRED UNITY PLEASE CLARIFY
ft THE PAGES AFTER THE FAST FRAME ANALYSIS SEEM TO HAVE
ANALYZED THE MOMENT FRAME AGAIN PLEASE CLARIFY
Cartsbad PCR06-116 (Orig O5-2O57)
September 21, 2O06
al PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONNECTIONS OF THE
MOMENT FRAME TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECTION 2213 6 OF
THE 97 UBC
hi ALONG LINE 3 25 REFLECTED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN (S3 1)
SHOWS DRAG TRUSS CONNECTED TO THE STEEL TUBE BUT THE SAME
TUBE DOES NOT SEEM TO CARRY ANY LATERAL LOAD
il AGAIN. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LATERAL ANALYSIS PLEASE DO
NOT JUST ANALYZE THE MOMENT FRAMES BUT ALSO THE SHEAR WALLS
TO VERIFY STABILITY OF THE WHOLE HOUSE
il IT LOOKS LIKE THAT THE ORIGINAL COMMENT # 3 IS STILL NOT
RESPONDED TO
k) IT SEEMS THAT THERE IS NO CALCULATIONS MADE FOR THE
MOMENT FRAME ALONG LINE 2 75 TO INCLUDE THE GRADE BEAM
H IT SEEMS THAT ANCHOR BOLTS CALCULATIONS RECOMMENDED 24"
EMBEDMENT INTO THE CONCRETE BUT NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS
PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE TO
SECTION 1923 OF THE 97 UBC
ml A COMPLETE STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK WHEN ALL THE ITEMS
ABOVE ARE MET
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a
format similar to that shown below Section 106 3 2 IT SEEMS NOT RESPONDED TO
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special
Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED-? REMARKS
FIELD WELDING
SPECIAL MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS
(SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY)
CONCRETE
HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an
inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to
issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the
attached form IT SEEMS THAT THE FORM DID NOT INCLUDE THE CONCRETE
AND THE HS BOLTS
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.05-2057)
September 21, 2006
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with government for (BuMing Safety
DATE September 6, 2006 O I APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2057) SET IV
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum. Telephone # 760-931-6797
Date contacted ^[b t^^k^A) Fax # 760-722-3148
Mail Telephone Faxv' In Person
REMARKS
By Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 8/28/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego. California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig O5-2057)
September 6, 2OO6
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCRO6-116
(Ong.O5-2O57)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way SET IV
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
ESGIL CORPORATION 8/28/06 September 6, 2006
REVIEWED BY Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to Esgil Corp ortothebldg dept of the juris
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes aNo
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2057)
September 6, 2006
o PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state
licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify expiration date of
license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 Please detail the shear transfer from the roof diaphragm at the stairs to the new moment
frame
4 Please provide a plan view of detail 4/S-7 Please show how a full penetration groove
weld will be provided for the 1/2" x 8" x 12" A36 plate
5 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a
format similar to that shown below Section 106 3 2
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special
Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code
ITEM REQUIRED'? REMARKS
FIELD WELDING
SPECIAL MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS
(SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY)
HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
6 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an
inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to
issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the
attached form
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2O57)
September 6, 2006
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
• Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank
you
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Ong.O5-2O57)
September 6, 2OO6
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2057)
Job Address or Legal Description 1014 Tulip Way
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building
Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during
the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she
is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials,
structural changes, or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is required to submit written
reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved The
final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and
approved by the City of Carlsbad building department
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items
indicated on the reverse side of this sheet
(over)
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig.O5-2O57)
September 6, 2O06
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION //}/*-/
PLAN CHECK NUMBER
tlSS) !/--
OWNER'S NAME
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I,
or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as required
by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at the site listed
above UBC Section 106 3 5
Signed _
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as
required by UBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above
Engineer's/Architect's Seal
ialuWttore
Signed
1 List of work requiring special inspection
n Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection (J3 Field Welding
D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI R/High Strength Bolting
O Prestressed Concrete |Y] Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
D Structural Masonry G Sprayed-On Fireproofmg
CD Designer Specified [~| Other
2 Name(s) of mdividual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above
A
B
C
3 Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above
A
B
C
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig O5-2057)
September 6, 20O6
City of Carlsbad
Building Department
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No PCRO6-116 (Orig.05-2057)
Job Address or Legal Description 1014 Tulip Way
Owner tfj V ft/tiThl _ Address /O/tJ yt/£//* /U# V .
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building
Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during
the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she
is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate matenals,
structural changes, or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is required to submit written
reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved The
final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and
approved by the City of Carlsbad building department
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items
indicated on the reverse side of this sheet "
(over)
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Ong.05-2O57)
November 3O, 20O6
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AW ~H>\&
PLAN CHECK NUMBER & &&06^h OWNER'S NAME KJW
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I,
or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as required
by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at the site listed
above UBC Section 106 3 5
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection
program as required by UBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above
Engineer's/Art^ - - - •
& Signatyi
Signed
1 List of work requiring special inspection
[0^oils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Q'Tield Welding ^^O/^CAX^x'
[^'Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI O Wigh Strength Boltmg*:^=:r^*'^
G Prestressed Concrete Qcxpansion/Epoxy Anchors
G Structural Masonry G Sprayed-On Fireproofmg
G Designer Specified G Other
2 Name(s) of mdividual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above
A
B
C
3 Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above
A
B
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with government for <BuMing Safety
DATE August 21, 2O06
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2057) SET III
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
2Sl The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
IXI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
I I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
IXI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted Ray Baum GJ M) Telephone* 760-931-6797
Date contacted <* IzzJo^ (by \^ ) Fax # (l (j> o) 12-2- 2>/ <-/ f
Mail -^ Telephone -^ Fax ^ In Person
REMARKS
By Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Elizarraras
Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 8/11/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2057)
August 21, 2O06
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116
(Orig 05-2057)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way SET III
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
ESGIL CORPORATION 8/11/06 August 21, 2OO6
REVIEWED BY Steve Sanders for Bert Domingo & Bill Elizarraras
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate recheckmg, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes aNo
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig.05-2057)
August 21, 2O06
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed bv the California
state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify
expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above the living room and
stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates'? But
did not show how the lateral loads will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete
analyses reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation AGAIN. PLEASE
SUBMIT COMPLETE ANALYSIS REFLECTING THE DIAPHRAGM LOADINGS AND
LOAD PATH ALL THE WAY TO THE FOUNDATION PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
CORRECTIONS ALSO
A) THE CALCULATIONS INDICATED WIND GOVERNS BUT THERE SEEMS NO
SEISMIC ANALYSIS WERE SUBMITTED TO COMPARE WITH
B) PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LOADS WERE DERIVED WHERE THE 2000 #
CAME FROM. ETCETERA
C) THE CALCULATIONS FOR LINE 2 INDICATES THAT THE COLUMNS WOULD
TAKE THE LATERAL LOADS BUT SEEM NOT RESTRAINED TO CARRY THE
OVERTURNING EFFECT OF THE LATERAL LOAD PLEASE THE OTHER
COLUMNS ALSO
D) THE CALCULATIONS SEEM TO HAVE USED THE X-X PROPERTY OF THE
SECTION OF THE COLUMNS BUT THE PLANS SEEM TO SHOW
DIFFERENTLY
E) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE. THE COLUMNS SEEM NOT COMPATIBLE WITH
THE INTENT OF SUPPORTING THE LATERAL LOAD
F) AGAIN. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LATERAL ANALYSIS PLEASE SEE
ITEM 3 ABOVE
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig.05-2O57)
August 21, 2006
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGii Corporation
In Partnership with government for <Bm[<fing Safety
DATE July 31, 2005 OAEEUCANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06- 1 16 (Orig 05-2057) SET II
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
Person contacted ,Rav Baum Telephone # 760-931-6797
Date contacted ^/ f /#£(by/^) Fax #//
Mail telephone A/ Fax In Person
REMARKS
By Bill Ehzarraras Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/20/06 tmsmUdot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4* San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
PCR06-116 (Orig.O5-2O57)
July 31, 2OO5
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURISDICTION Carlsbad
(Ong.O5-2O57)
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 7/20/06
REVIEWED BY Bill Ehzarraras
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116
SET II
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED
July 31, 2005
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of
prints to THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT
B To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans
C The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original
correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items
D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
QYes QNo
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2057)
Jfcly 31, 2005
• The following corrections are from the original deficiency list, and were either not
addressed or a result of new changes
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list
Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700
The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering
and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building
Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state
licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation Specify expiration date of
license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings (above
the living room and stairwell) to the resisting elements The response references
details 7 & 9/S-6 showing straps to plates7 But did not show how the lateral loads
will be transferred to the resisting elements Please submit complete analyses
reflecting diaphragm loading and load path all the way to the foundation
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has
been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate
Yes a No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan
review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please
contact Bert Domingo for Bill Ehzarraras at Esgil Corporation Thank you
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with government for <Bui[ding Safety
DATE July 13, 2O05 a APPLICANT
JURISDICTION Carlsbad /a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2O57) SET I
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
PROJECT NAME Revisions for Baum Residence Addition and Remodel
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck
XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person
XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to
Ray Baum
1014 Tulip Way, Carlsbad, CA 92011
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed
/• , \Person contacted Ray Baum (J/t^J Telephone # 760-931-6797
/^^ (by ]^} Fax #J^ x •* r" '
MaiL-^Telephone -^ Fax In Person
REMARKS
By Bill Ehzarraras Enclosures
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/5/06 trnsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057)
July 13, 2005
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig O5-2O57) JURISDICTION Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
FLOOR AREA STORIES
REMARKS Revision
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED July 13, 2005
HEIGHT
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION 7/5/06
PLAN REVIEWER Bill Ehzarraras
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC,
2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i e . plan sheet number, specification section, etc
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans
Carlsbad PCRO6-116 (Orig 05-2O57)
July 13, 2005
• PLANS
1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list Submit two sets of plans for residential projects For expeditious processing,
corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways
1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments
2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments
2 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the
California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation
Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code)
3 When severing original Architect from project and revising plans, none of the
new revised designs may bear the Architects name or stamp Please remove or
replace sheets
4 Several of the windows from the two different floor plans are contradicting?
Some need to be tempered on the new design
5 Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in
accordance with Section 2406 4 for new designs
a) Where the bottom exposed edge of the window glazing is less than 60
inches above a standing surface and dram inlet of tubs and drains
b) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed
edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door
in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is
less than 60 inches above the walking surface
c) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of
stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above
a walking surface
6 Show the placement and configuration of the new bathroom layouts
7 Please show calculations for the connection of the moment frame to verify
conformance to section 2213 6 UBC
8 Show how the shear load on the 2nd floor would be transferred thru the openings
(above the living room and stairwell) to the resisting elements
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig O5-2O57)
July 13, 2005
9 If you are using the pre-fab moment frames from Hardy, please provide the
Hardy details on the plans
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Bill Elizarraras at Esgil Corporation Thank you
Carlsbad PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057)
July 13, 2005
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO PCR06-116 (Orig 05-2057)
PREPARED BY Bill Ehzarraras DATE July 13, 2005
BUILDING ADDRESS 1014 Tulip Way
BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN
BUILDING
PORTION
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdiction Code
AREA
(Sq Ft)
cb
RIHn Pprrml- FPP hv Orrlinanrp ^ 1
Valuation
Multiplier
By Ordinance
Reg
Mod
VALUE ($)
>
•*
| Plan Check Fee by Ordinance '"* \
Type of Review n Complete Review
$360 00
F Structural Only
I~ Repetitive Fee
Repeats
l~ Other
,-T Hourly Hours *
r <r
* Based on hourly rate
Comments
Esgil Plan Review Fee
r
$288 00
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue doc
PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS
PERMIT NUMBER
ADDRESS fot¥^
DATE
RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT
RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR
(<$10,000.00)
PLAZA CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES
VILLAGE FAIRE
COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING
OTHER )C
PLANNER
ENGINEE
DATE
DATE
Docs/MiatomB/Planning Engineering Approvals
Cfl
o o odecn a aa. fS. S.nn
efb n
Plan Check No
Planner Chris Sexton
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Address
Phone (760) 602-4624
Type of Project & Use
Zoning ft* J General Plan
CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation
Net Project Density.DU/AC
Facilities Management Zone
Remaining net dev acres.
Circle One (For non-residential development Type of land used created by this
permit )
Legend C3 Item Complete D Item Incomplete - Needs your action
Environmental Review Required YES NO j^/TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action
Conditions of Approval
Discretionary Action Required
APPROVAL/RESO NO
PROJECT NO
YES NO \^ TYPE.
DATE
OTHER RELATED CASES
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action
Conditions of Approval
D D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO
If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103,
San Diego CA 92108-4402, (619)767-2370
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt)
D Habitat Management Plan
Data Entry Completed? YES NO w^
If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and
assess fees in Permits Plus
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type
impacted/taken, UPDATE')
£jj CU Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES _ NO
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993 )
Data Entry Completed? YES _ NO _
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N,
Enter Fee, UPDATE')
H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 3/06
Site Plan
ODD Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow, property lines, easements,
existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width,
dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes)
Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number
nnn
Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines
1 Applicability YES NO.
2 Project complies YES NO_
Zoning
1 Setbacks
Front
Side
ide
Rear
Top of slope
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
2 Accessory structure setbacks
Front Required
Interior Side Required
Street Side Required
Rear Required
Structure separation Required
3 Lot Coverage Required.
4 Height Required'
I ,
^ v/r"
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Spaces Required
Shown
Shown
. Shown
. Shown
. Shown
Shown.
Shown.
Shown5 Parking
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown
Additional Comm
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER
H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 3/06
>*•
Servin Engineering, Inc.
2382 Camino Vida Roble, Suite F
Carlsbad, CA 92011
(760)931-1792, Fax (760)931-1892
Email nservin(fljservin-engineenng com
November 20, 2006
Esgil Corporation
9230 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208
San Diego, California 92123 858-560-1468, 858-560-1576 Fax
Attention Chuck Mendenhal
Regarding PCF06-116 (Original 05-2057) 1014 Tulip for Ray Baum, Remodel and addition
Dear Chuck
It pains me to write this letter I feel 1 have no choice in the matter, therefore my action Your company has
always been a pillar of fair review on behalf of the agencies, which is why its taken me a while to come to
this point
On November 17, 2006 we went to your offices to meet with Bert Domingo on this project, to discuss the
lengthy plan check since July 13, 2005 up to now
History
A permit was granted on this proj ect in 2005 Unfortunately, the previous designer had overlooked some site
encroachments which required a slight re-design of the home, but essentially, the home remained the same
The client hired another architect to assert the true dimensions of the site and house on said lot
Consequently, we had to revise some of our engineering Subsequent to this, a submital for revision was
made for the changes
Initially, Bill Elizarraras did the review with only 3 structural comments relating to a certain portion of the
building on July 13, 2005 We addressed the correction with a specific response and we got 1 structural
comment on July 31,2005 Then in August 21,2006, we got a response from Steve Sanders on behalf of Bill
and Bert This time we received multiple comments related to the same question from Bill At that point my
office offered to meet with Bert He said to resubmit with responses to the comments
On September 6,2006 we received comments back to our responses with a toned down version of comment
#3 to specifics relating to shear transfer details only, and one other comment, #4 At this point we felt that
we finally got through and were on our way to getting a plan change We were surprised that on September
21 the old comments to question #3 had resurrected At this point we were very confused, to say the least
Again, we offered to meet, but were told to submit the plans again with corrections
On October 6, 2006 we again receive comments from Bert this time, expanding on the original correction
with some specifics, which were appreciated He concludes with saying that, "Again the lateral system of
the building has been changing so many times " We have not changed as he states other that to offer
remedies to the comments he had previously Again, we offer to meet only to have him arrogantly excuse
my engineering assistant to resubmit only, which we did
Again on October 31,2006, from the comments received in bold, caps and double underlined one can sense
the frustration on his part This time he offers to meet, which we finally did on November 17
Meeting and discussion
In our meeting on the 17"1, Bert was cordial, as always He asked, did you make revisions to address my
comments91 said, we came here for two purposes, first, we need to know where the confusion lies between
you and us due to our apparent lack of understanding your comments entirely or you not understanding our
responses to your comments, second, I'd like to explain our design schematic for this project I started to
explain the lateral and vertical loading from top to bottom, especially in the area of real concern over the
winding stair were we have some columns that transfer the loading to the diaphragms below He stopped me
on several occasions to explain that we needed to explain the entire building's lateral system because it had
never been resolved I argued that it did not make sense, since we already had a building permit and that we
were in to make a plan change only He argued that the previous permit was only for the stair, I said no it
was not and I stated if that was the case, then why did the previous plan checkers only discuss the stair area
diaphragm loading only I appeared to have gotten under his skin somehow, due to his apparent change in
tone and demeanor and condescending remarks
After some point, I again asked him to let me continue with the explanation on the entire building, which I
did Finally, he acknowledged that it appeared that we had shear walls throughout all directions to handle
the loads It appeared that the only contention was the upper roof diaphragm/column system remained to be
the issue, that he would look at when we resubmitted In conclusion with our meeting, he offered to review
the entire calculations along with the updated plans I indicated that we would submit next week and thanked
him for his time and shook hands
Concern
Chuck, I'm not one to skirt around the issues or engineering concerns, which is why I like the consistency
of EsgiPs approach to being consistent with reviews, unlike some small cities I'm concerned that Bert holds
resentment toward me somehow and is taking it out on my project and client During our meeting, he did get
animated and raised his voice then he condescendingly addressed me as "Nick, you are an engineer, you
should know better, you know how to do this The miscommumcation is on your part, not mine " I do have
a witness to this unprofessional conduct But more importantly, Bert has a duty to your company as a
representative to resolve issues/conflicts in the most efficient manner and move on to the next proj ect, as wel 1
as a duty to the City of Carlsbad
Case in point, in the past dealing with Manuel Ainza, formerly with Esgil and now with the County of San
Diego, we resolved issues with a face to face meeting where we hashed it out on the spot and sign off, as you
have in the past with me Ainza is a registered SE as you are, I hold both of you in high esteem and grateful
to know you both
I'm not sure what I ever did to Bert to deserve this He is a sharp engineer and I do respect him, but he should
not resort to unprofessional behavior, as he did on Friday When Bert was a private engineer, I helped him
on a Flood Analysis using HEC2, he was grateful then My assistant was shocked at his behavior
Sorry about being so long with the letter, I will conclude now I wish to have the review performed by either
you or Sergio Azuela Sergio has been a fair reviewer in the past and similar to Ainza, we have had face to
face meetings and we have resolved the issues on the spot
One last note of concern, my client is in severe financial distress due to the hold up since July He may loose
his house because the bank won't release any more money until he has more inspections Don't take my word
for it, you may call him at 760-931-6797 or fax him at 760-722-3148
Chuck, I thank you for all of your help on this matter, you have always been one to provide assistance and
a fair review
Sincerely yours,
NICK SERVIN, PE, Principal Engineer #33538
\\Servineng\data\john\D\Jobs\Tulip\Esgil 1 wpd
\0
itf
i
O