Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1015 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB960967; Permit
BUILDING PERMIT 07/25/96 15:14 . ' , Page 1 of 1 . -• Job Address: 1015 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Permit Type: MECHANICAL . Parcel No: 205-190-25-04 Lot#: Valuation: 60,000 ., Occupancy Group: •'. Reference*; Description: CELLULAR PCS FACILITY : INCLUDES ELECTRICAL Appl/Ownr : CHESTNUT PLAZA HOMEOWNERS 619 1015 CHESTNUT AVENUE #2G CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Permit No: CB960967 Project No: A9601380 Development No: 8739 07/25/96 QOOi 01 02 C-F'RMT 480=00 .Construction. Type: NEW Status.: ISSUED Applied: 05/31/96 Apr/Issue: 07/25/96 Entered By: DC 744-8822 *•** Fees Required **** * f<Feeo Collected & Credits *** ; Fees:. . 782,00 Adjustments: , .00 Total Fees: - 78'2,00 Fee description • Total-"Credits.: Total Pay man-to« . - Balance ,Du,e: " Units Fee/Unit .00 . 302.00 ' 480.00 Ext fee Data Enter '¥' for Mechanical Issue'"Fee-> Other- , . . -> ' > Other. ;./ ' "•-"''> * MECHANICAL TOTAL ;302.00 , .46 5.-0,0- 15. 00 Y 302.00 PLANCHECK 465.00 BP.ERM.IT 782.00 BUILDING PLANS IN STORAGE ATTACHED CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE From List 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type:.cn For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units PLAN CHECK NO.-lf 7 EST.VAL PLANCK DEPOSIT VALID. BY DATE 2. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY/\/V/V-j f\-t Address Nearest Cross Street Bunding or Suite No. AV&. ,C-PRMT 302-00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number No- 135-14 Unit No. Phase No. -fh& frfa o,f TCHECK BELOW IF SUBMII TED: D 2 Energy Calcs jfe Structural Calcs D 2 Soils Report D1 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL (of,Cf? "'ff. C£>fv)o£>^EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK SQ. FT. op- o~ # OF STORIES # OF BEDROOMS # OF BATHROOMS 3. UUN lAlJl FKKiJUN lit diilerent trom applicant} NAME (last name ~ CITY icao ADDRESS ~^^>O C&sr\ilO £feJ ~R|~O STATE Gjf\ "ZIP CODE ^;?./ 06 DAY TELEPHONE (f\Q } *\l it - IOI 4. APPLICANT' iJCUUrRAlTOR—U AGENT FUR CONTRACTOR D OWNER—D AGENT FOR OWNt'R' NAME (last name first) Jpo (Jlcr^^lflV^ fq/gQW5 "5?5t5£> C^xrHJOO <d ej STATE^IA ZIP CODE Q 2,1 0@ DAY TELEPHONE 4fc / O, "NAME (last name first)Ids' STATE ^/) ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE - g Q 6. CONTRACTOR NAME (last name first) CITY STATE LIC. ADDRESS Y2/// ^ ZIP CODE "^2 5 ^O DAY TELEPHONE > LICENSE CLASS >Q CITY BUSINESS LIC. # DESIGNER NAME (last name first) CITY STATE ZIP CODE JDRESS DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. # 7. WORKERS'COMPKNSA'noN Workers Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate ot consent to self-insure issuea by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building InspectionJJepartment (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMP. Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of thtTwork tor which this permit is Issued, I shall not employ any person in anjTmanner so as to beecnne-subjectJro the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Uwner-Builder Declaration: l nereoy artirm that 1 am exempt rrom the Contractors License Law tor the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burdenof proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and die basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NOIs the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MKETiNG THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 9. CONSTRUCTION LENDING ACiENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency tor the performance ot the work tor which this permit is issued (Sec 3097 (i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state thattheabove information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SATO CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA; An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by sudyoermit is rust commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended cf abaitilcmeU at anmiflae^fter the/work-is cpmihenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303 (d) Uniform BuiWWCode). APPLICANTS SIGNATURE / Yfl /) fatIS\ 71/W IT I DATsO/^/ / 1TE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance i CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB960967 FOR 09/20/96 DESCRIPTION: CELLULAR PCS FACILITY INCLUDES ELECTRICAL TYPE: MECH JOB ADDRESS: 1015 CHESTNUT AV APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: CHESTNUT PLAZA HOMEOWNERS REMARKS: MW/RICARDO SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK# CB960967 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STE: LOT: 619 744-8822 INSPECT TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 19 39 LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT# TYPE CO940108 COFO STATUS ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ST Final Structural EL Final Electrical ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 082796 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PD 081396 Grout AP PD 080896 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 080696 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PD 080696 Underground/Conduit-Wiring PA PD COMMENTS VERIFY TYPE OF MATERIAL 2ND LIFT OK TO GROUT EsGil Corporation yrofessional ytan 3(eview 'Engineers DATE: 7/19/96 a APPLICANT " Q FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OlTAlTRE VIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-967 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1015 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: PCS Facility The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. " " The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified in the attached list are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified oirtrte enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Barry Lackmann 3530 Camino Del Rio N Suite 101 San Diego CA92108 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation Q GA Q CM n EJ D GP D PC 7/11 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 4 (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-967 II 7/19/96 2. Provide a letter from the soils engineer indicating that the foundation plan been reviewed and it conforms with the soils report. 3. The soils engineer recommended that he/sne'Teview the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan wat"3flor to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation insp^tipT0he soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 5. City to approve for using the fiberglass material as structural member( If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact David Yao of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. EsGil Corporation <£rofe.ssiona.C<£[an "Review 'Engineers DATE: 6/11/96 C^AEEUCANT (dJTJRTS^ a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a~PrAfi*REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-967 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1015 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: PCS Facility The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. Xl The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Barry Lackmann 3530 Camino Del Rio N Suite 101 San Diego CA 92108 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation rj GA Q CM fj EJ fj GP fj PC 6/4 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 *• (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-967 6/11/96 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-967 OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: SPRINKLERS?: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 6/11/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: BTS & Antenna ACTUAL AREA: 380 STORIES: HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/4 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. » The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC )comforw.dot Carlsbad 96-967 6/11/96 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619)560-1468. • FOUNDATION 2. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Or check with city. 3. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." • FRAMING 4. Provide calculation to justify the existing roof framing can resist the additional force from the antenna. 5. Provide ICBO approval number for using fiberglass material. Or check with city. • ADDITIONAL 6. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 7. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: P Yes a No 8. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of Carlsbad 96-967 6/11/96 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. « ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW • 1993 NEC * PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 1. Please show the grounding electrode and electrode conductor for building BTS (at the transfer switch) on the single line diagram and floorplan(optional). Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 96-967 6/11/96 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: David Yao BUILDING ADDRESS:, 1015 Chestnut Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-967 DATE: 6/11/96 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION BTS equipment & An- tennea Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER per permit application VALUE ($) • • 60,000.00 [X] 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee Q Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $459.50 E3 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee rj Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 298.68 Type of Review: G Complete Review fj Structural Only G Hourly G Repetitive Fee Applicable rj Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 238.94 Comments: Fire Services Review: G Fire Alarm G Complete Review Other: G Suppression System Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: Comments: $ Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:T BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.7 EST. VALUE APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. I IA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with \±j£ Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review, /i / f /i &/ /-, —\ c< By:.Date: By:.Date: By:_Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AKTHORIZAT10N TO ISSUE BUtt-DING PERMfTt BY;DATE:. ATTACHMENTS I I Dedication Application I I Dedication Checklist I I Improvement Application I I Improvement Checklist I I Future Improvement Agreement I I Grading Permit Application I I Grading Submittal Checklist I I Right of Way Permit Application I—I Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet I—I Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON City of Carlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad. CA 92009 PHONE : (619) 438-1161, Ext. ^ ? /I V A-4 P:\DOCS\CHKLST\BP0001 .FRM REV 04/30/96 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 2ndv/ 3rd%/ O Cl CD 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets D D D 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography B. Existing & Proposed Slopes QOLT] 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)." [Perl 985 UBC 2907(d)5]. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). D D D 4. Include on title sheet A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION P:\OOCS\CHKLST\BP0001.FRM Page 1 Of 4 REV 04/30/86 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 1stf/ 2nd\/ 3rdv/ Ids. Project does ngt cornply^with the fojjpwing Engineering Cyondi^ions of approval for Project No. Conditions were complied with by: Date:_ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS EH O 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8-1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS L~H L~H 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds .$ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: P:\DOCS\CHKLST\BP0001 .FRM Page 2 Of 4 REV 04/30/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3rdV % D IH d 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Improvement Plans signed by: Date:. CH D EH 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date:_ CH CH CH 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D D 8&. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). DDE] 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D D D 8c. No Grading Permit required. R\CXXS\CHKLST\BP0001.FRM Page 3 Of 4 REV 04/30/86 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 1stv/ 2ndy 3rdv/ D D D 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Riaht-of-Wav and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: D D D 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. D D D 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted by: Date: P:\DOCS\CHKLS1\BP0001.FRM Page 4 Of 4 REV 04/30/96 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST •3 € B & £cfl (0 (0Q Q Q rD T- co co* =tt *x. ^ ^ 0) <D 0>S2 ^ JCo o o eg eg to Q. Q- Q. D D V^ Iw Plan Check No. CB Address Planner David Rick Phone (619) 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) APN: Type of Project and Use: Facilities Management Zone:Zone: CFD (in/@l) # circle (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department) Legend Item Complete Item incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES DATE OF COMPLETION: NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval ) W D Discretionary Action Required: YES APPROVAL/RESO NO. PROJECT NO. UJ? NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditio^ps or approval? If not, state conditions wjiich require action Conditions of Approval Co^* L\ (#<>*<* erf foyy.'cAvQ g^ ^od. t 7 California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES DATE OF APPROVAL: NO San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with^conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 n 00 D B/ D D Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993). Site Plan: D D 1 • Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: 2. 3. 4. Add 5*' Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: Lot Coverage: Height: Parking: Guest Itional Comments In ' se-V back H»r -jt •-.. - ,.'. - Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Spaces Required £; stfe -:p/3/v ;ia?clj ........ „ • /--•• '- ••>••• • ••'•'-,:•, (/ ' ' Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 72> >.o£ Cf\/ > Sc^ id , Swo^ <A^-' • • ••.••>.••-•»••. ;.'-< . ,,..:;: ,-•:•'• .. •.•,\.i;-;:"'.-1?—' ; • . OKVTO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE K:\ADMIN\COUNTER\PLANCK. FRM 1-17-96 City of Carlsbad 96139 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Monday, June 10,1996 Reviewed by._ Contact Name Bany Lackmann Address 3530 Camino Del Rio N Ste 101 City, State San Diego CA 92108 Bldg. Dept. No. 96-967 Planning No. Job Name Cox CA PCS/Chesstnut Job Address _ioi5_Chestnut Ste. or Bldg. No. IEI Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency'ID CFD Job# 96139 File# 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 9958 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 566-3113 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT : (Project // CLIENT : KPC DESIGNED BY : DATE : REVISIONS : SIMON WONG ENGINEERING This signature is to be a wet signature, not a copy. APPROVED BY : DATE SIGNED : (This SET of CALCULATIONS has ^<=> pages) Project ! ^•3^? l^. Q 1 Designed : ^.* Checked : // \vy ^^y \srflucrufw t. s BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibort Slreol. Suilo 202 (619) 566-3113 San Diogo, CA 92131 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page : ^ Proj. it: t0D-4,L Dale : Revised : 5/\o/!}& r \-o O-h Hf- = = {.of, Project : Designed Checked WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL S BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page : 3 Proj.tf: Date : Revised : PiM V/ I 1 ^g V'\ \l-io" I'l 00 IxJ ^ ^O j*7\ ) M* upup Pr°jccl : Designed : Checked : // ^ //\ /7\S // \y/ ., JW^ \^ S1MON WONG ENGINEERING SrflUCTURAl & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619) 566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Date : Revised: f- IV -r \/M * •#.. n. "" ne» I'rojecl : Designed: ^ [_- Chcckcd : =.. SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page : 5 Revised: 750 \J ^ O A) '7 8 X 6& y-z. Projccl : Designed Checked : WONG ENGINEERING & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street. Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(6 19) 566-6844 Page : Proj. # : Date : Revised K.-2. 7" , ill" 1 n f. 31^" 7.M" , n- fl1 7 •' '? '' _^ uO^= ^-o'^ C " /'y T ^c 2/7. b<y? -t- 3 v/ -A T/,X/0X • C Designed : Checked : =-. SIMON STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibort Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92 1 3 1 (619) 566-3113 FAX(6 1 9) 566-6844 2. Proj. ft Date : Revised : A- W W , o -- ^ ^ ,Jb 5 /t>?-7T ..... - C. U>A-t? oCiAr ^£'V<? i- 4 >pur A- ~ r~i.it- X A -z <C^ f» =C/- 1,6000 Project : Designed Checked //^ /f\. /?\S // \J/ \y/y \^ SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL S BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Date : Revised V'v -H- t t E>M r A V tc k-M J H C "2 o' „,, 2-7 OP o 6 Project : Designed : Checked : SIRUCrURALS BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego. CA 92131 (619) 566-311 3 FAX(619) 566-6844 Proj. #: Dale : Revised : ^ [^ipE V. MlLTI 0.771- 10 XO H'UTl Project : Designed : Checked STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page : Pr°J'#: Date: Revised •C'" r prf To I Te? i To To Project : Designed Checked STRUCTURAL£ ORIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street. Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Proj. It Dale : Revised f\\-J' 03<O o. QL UJI 5= UJ10 2'-G" KEY PRIMARY CASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (8T5) RRiMAflY POWER CAOINET BATTERY CABINET AUXIUARY CABINET ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASSEMOU EXPANSION CABINET EXPANSION CABINET EQUIPMENT PUMTORU-SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS CABUZ TRAY UNES OF REQUIRED CLEARANCE AROUND EQUIPMENT S5- H MONOPOLE W/TOP MOUNTED ANTEHNAS UNDERGROUND CAOLES TO WONOPOLE ANTENNA ARRAYS ABOVE CHAIN UNK FTNCE •«/OA«OEO WIRES ABOVE +' W DOUBLE CHAIN UNK GATES LEASE AREA LIMIT LINE 6" OIA. X 4' H CONCRETE FILLED OOLLARO AREA FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR ' (t) ADJACENT BLOCK WALL Designed : Checked : SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego. CA 921 31 (619) 566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page :to |"°J- #: Date : Revised : ^ OfcP I I /? I ft- u f/\r? (S. _4 » I X • % H I Designed : Checked WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL S BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page: Proj.tf: 100- Date : Revised H -•f vn =• «- bo < ^ <?."!? A 4t 5 - x ^d> X $, ^ ' 1-2. •a ffoc, -I -Voice I : Designed: £,[_ Checked : WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619) 566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page : Proj. # : Date : Revised: r O iA Tt-- i ' X. X = Boo As, - T^f Designed •' <<, u Checked : WONG ENGINEERING & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego. CA 921 31 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page:/3 Proj.#: Date: Revised : T f / v -.^ v y | •= Designed : x- i Checked : WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page: / 4 Proj.#: Date : Revised : s 4 V- O .®. ' \r> -f- JJroicct : Designed :L Checked : WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page Date : Revised (7lA-^ 7.0-7 IV- Q- , A /p7-S IN p 1 1 UJLV. i . ^^ jj^^ ^ £/vi£t£0AP (S-PI/P?) Designed : ^ u- Checked : •''..- • < ~ . .'}.;.. // !.. ... — * C/fl/f^A/ \Hir\Mr* ETA/^/A/FFD/A/^:/r >\ //^. //—T.SIIVIUIv WUrKj c/v(j/;Vi-i_ri//V<j ./ \v/Li^S^. \y STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 (619) 566-3113 San Diego, CA 92131 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page: ^ Proj.#: / oo -4 ><o. Dale : $/^ Revised : x fV * A, X a- _f 2i_— - '3 Project : fcrf? 1 4 *?/ Designed : ^ ^_ Checked : '- • ' "• - ,/W • -, /vx— /^—tf= . S//WON WON // \ff \%- \STRUCTURAL { 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA92131 G ENGINEERING 5 BRIDGE ENGINEERS (619)566-3113 FAX(6 19} 566-6844 Page : ^ Proj. # : /<?o-4;£, Date : Z/lb Revised : K -TO Project : Designed : Checked : WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA. 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page: Proj.#: Date : Revised c I/ f n. / - f f ~ i..o = ^ 24 4 U? 14 f r M c, Project : Designed Checked SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL S BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619) 566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page Date: Revised r Wf'f e>~7 ^ - f£> • - V, y. 3' T/Vfcte 73-l.il-u) V ' Project :J Designed: Checked : SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (61 9) 566-31 1 3 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page : Date : Revised : Project : * O> I/O M TbvJM £>£? Designed Checked A C?WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page : Proj. #: Date : Revised r t -f- - X_ X j / T X- ( O r Project : Designed Checked WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page : VTr Proj.#: Date: Revised : r T ?' v/r; -#- y / a MMFG BEAMS /Ssrss '.r.fff Y OUUAMt & MtU 1 ANUUUAtt 1 UBCO - tA 1 HtW OUU & O/CO a E = 2.6X106psi Fu = 30,000 psi ' V! Allowable Uniform Loads in Pounds Per Foot / e\ SPAN IN FEET 3x3x1/4 3 .Wt/ft = 2.20 Ibs 4; bf/tf = 12.0 5 Fb = 7863 psi 6 ,., Aw = 1.25 in2 , . ,7 Ix = 3.50 in4 8 Sx = 2.33in3 9 10 4x4x1/4 • •,•..;;: ',".".\-' ''• "' . .• ' -' .5 ' jifWt/ft = 3.08 ibs. ; :V' .,• : ': : 6 bf/t, = 16.0 7 Fb = 6160 psi 8 :v Aw = 1.75in2 ". 9 • Ix = 8.82 in4 10 Sx = 4.41 in3 11 12 13 4x1/8x2x1/4 5 :;;: wt/ft = 1.52 ibs .;:S ^K^- 6 . b,/t, = 8.0 7 Fb = 11,100psi 8•' ' * f • , • • . •• •';•.•«'•-•' .1' •''.-,•.! ' Aw = .94 in2 • . ' ' . •; "••;;;•_;. ,;9'V ' 'fi;Ix:=4.4l in4 ;;.••••• /:-"';-'^/' -W^:.' Sx = 2.21 in3 11 12 6-1/2x1/4x2x1/2 5 Wt/ft = 3.77 Ibs ' ...'.' . ,,.:."V' 6 b,/t, = 4.0 7 Fb = 12,000 psi 8 .i Aw = 2.75 in2 •'..•'"., 9 ••;••'•-.:•• ",.i: • • . -. .- .'.,--• ••-,'••-,.-..' :'-' -V ., ; ' •'• '-,* ;•- K ix=24:97;iri4 ;-. V ',/;:"'; "10"; Sx = 7.68in3 11 12 j,. .'' ] ';' V; "' ' • ',•'!].: -:-''. :.'.V3'"V' '"'J:i>:'-' • :•'! :-• - ^-l >?'-:'-;'>^:'*^jl^14^f:: 15 LATERALLY SUPPORTED - GOVERNED BY: Stress *Fb or Fv 1250 * 763 * 489 * 339 V249 * . 191 ' 151 * 122 * : 724 V503 * 369 * 283 * 223 * 181 * 150 * 126 * 107 564 . :,454 * 334 * 256 * 202 •;*.:.164-' * 135 * 114 1650 1375 1179 * 960 *,759 '* 614 * 508 * 427 .'*'.; 364' •£313: * 273 Deflection //100 . — : 633 345 207 133 '.'•-. 90 64 47 .• •, — - . ::489 320 219 157 . J16;. 88 68 54 403 247. 161 110 } .79 .':'•':, 58-;" 44 34 . . — 1246 834 583 422 314" 240 187 " 149- • : '1 20 98 //150 885 422 230 138 . 89, 60 43 31 531 326 213 146 105 77 59 45 36 269 165 107 74 53 . •':':• 39;. 29 23 1307 831 556 389 281 209' 160 125 99 ;.-... 1: 80-. 65 //180 738 352 192 115 74 IvSO 36 26 ,442; 272 178 122 87 64 49 38 30 224 .'•'.137?; 89 61 ...._. 44.':; '•;':;.';. -32J' 24 19 1089 692 463 324 234 175 133 104 83 67. 55 ;/240 .553 264 144 86 '.55;, 38 27 20 332 .,204 : 133 91 ; 65'1 ...; 48 37 28 22 168 103;> 67 46 ; 33 .'•.' 24.;-- 18 14 817 519 • 348 243 176. :' 131' 100 78 62 50 41 //360 369. 176; 96 57 ;'':-37,;.,, : ''25.;'..' 18 13 V221&; ,'.;.136:1: 89 61 :-'44':;;, '• ' 32^':^ 24 19 15 ; 112M :::':'.?69^ 45 31 Vc"'2"2 '-. '. ':• :,teB 12 9 544 ',;> 346;.;' 232 162 .-•1,1 7-.; •87 67 52 • 41 , ;';.-• :33'::f 27 Y MMFG COLUMN b/t = 16 SQUARE TUBE 4 x 1/4 Allowable Axial Stresses and Loads r = 1.53 in.= 3.74 in \/ EFFECTIVE COLUMN LENGTH (ft.) 0.5'•':-.-'• '"••••.i.o..;:.-" 1.5 2.0 ; /-:"^'--2.S-:^^ ' '•'":-'': 3.0 3.5 4.0 •'/.;,.' : 4.5 'S^- ''•'•• •••.'..•]' 5.0 .y ;;;•;• 5.5 6.0 -v.:: ".6.5-V".- •;'.;•' 7.0 : 7.5 8.0 K/ r 3.9 * .^'•:--:7;8V:-;. 11.8 15.7 :;: 19.6 r ••;""23.5'^:' 27.5 31.4 ;;.V-'35.3-^:;..•;; ';39.2.r 43.1 47.1 r;^;5t.o:v/, 54.91 58.8 62.7 ••,•..-.-. ./;• 8.5 •:;•,-,;•*••; ' •"'-' "''.""'9.0' : "^ 9.5 10.0 '•'. '"• .10.5. : .'.' : '11.0 '; •11.5 12.0 ;;--•;::' 12.5 '..y^ •-•• ; 13.0 '".?:. 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16:5 17.0 17.5 18.0 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 •.i.:-.'-66.7...'--" ^70-6': 74.5 78.4 82.4 > •:"\86.3:;:v:- 90.2 94.1 •;.f;:'98"dV'";102iO ; 105.9 109.8 113.7117:5 121 .6 125.5 •; 129'M:;::; " 133:3p 137.3 141.2 • 145.1 ;•••• 149.0 152.9 156.9 EXTREN® 500/525 E = 2.6 x 106 psi Fa (psi) 5131 . , • ' 5131 5131 5131 "V: 5131, ; 5131 '." 5131 5131 --•"7 5131 •;. 5131 , 5131 5131 •';:• 5131: •:•;• 5131 5131 5131 Fa' (PS!) 4791 4450 4149 3883 ... 3646 ; 3428 3236 3063 :;:,-;. 2905 2758 2627 2506 ; 2395 2292 2195 2106 •'&&'•' 2024 ;;X' /\;:v';:l948':vO:: 1874 ••1807 : 1744 1685 1630 1576 Pa Obs) 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 19190 Pa (Ibs) 17918 16643 15519 14523 13613 12819 12103 11455 19866 10315 9824 9373 8957 8573 8208 7878 7571 : V ,7284; '• 7010 6759 6524 6303 6094 5893 EXTREN® 625 E = 2.8 x 106 psi Fa (psi) 5526 . ' 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 Fa' (PS!) 5159 4792 4469 4181 3920 3691 3485 3298 3129 2970 2829 2699 2579 2469 2364 2268 2180 2097 2018 1946 1878 1815 1755 1697 Pa (Ibs) 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 20667 Pa Obs) 19295 17922 16712 15640 14660 13805 13034 12336 11702 11108 10580 10094 9646 9232 8840 8484 8153 7844 7549 7279 7025 6787 6563 6346 SHORT LONG Project •- Designed Checked : SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (61 9) 566-31 1 3 FAX(619) 566-6844 Pa§e:K// Proj. #: Date : Revised : (fit** c-WJ H Y\ - ^^ 4t 5 GL- 7-4-' <?/£. ('/) d- <^7-1 ^ X . ^ 1 -3 V - /f '> ~ W H X 2. oX Pr°Ject: Designed: Checked : i.% SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page: Proj. #:- 4i ( Date:7/?£ Revised : f + VAl/U vsf-TT 3 = N-crf 7 7 As 2 ^ 4 T Project: Designed Checked: SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92131 (619)566-3113 FAX(619) 566-6844 Page:5 Proj.#: Date: Revised • I Project : (<*T>\<rf) Designed: /^i. Checked : /\/\/\S/MON / \/ \7 \STRUC- 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 1VO/VG ENGINEERING <~URAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page: Proj. # :/ g>0 —£l 1 Iff Date : 7 /« £ Revised : L P-f. uJ *=' ^/4oX ^3.6-7 - lfu 'Ut /< ' Project : Designed: Checked : ^ SIMON WONG ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL & BRIDGE ENGINEERS 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 921 31 (619)566-3113 FAX(61 9) 566-6844 Page :W5" Date: Revised : fy 7-22-1996 2:21PM FROM HETHERINGTQN ENG.619 9311917 P. 2 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY July 19, 1996 Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2357 KDC Architects, Engineers PC 3530 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92108 Attention: Subject: Mr. ken Miller FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Proposed Cox California PCS Site SD149 - Downtown Carlsbad 1015 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California References: 1) 2) "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Cox California PCS Site, SD149 - Downtown Carlsbad, 1015 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California," by Hetherington Engineering, Inc., dated June 27, 1996. "Plans and Details, 1015 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California, Job #SD149," Sheets S-l through S-5, by KDC Architects, Engineers PC, dated July 11, 1996. Dear Mr. Miller: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the referenced report and plans. Based on our review, it appears that the foundation plans for the proposed equipment storage area have been prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in our referenced geotechnical investigation. Please call if there are any questions. Sincerely, x^"/- *A INC. Civi Geotechnical Engineer 397 (expire 3/31/00) MDH/sl cc: Ms. Cheryl Haeke - J.M.Consulting Group 5245 Avenida Encinas, Suite G • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (619) 931-1917 • Fax (619) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92G75-3G10 • (714) 487-9060 * Fax (714) 487-9116 Consulting Group, Inc. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: FROM: RE: July 8,1996 Mr. Jim Reed KDC Architects Engineers 3530 Camino del Rio No. San Diego, CA 92108 Ms. Cheryl M. Hacke SD149 - Downtown Carlsbad DELIVERED BY: HAND MAIL PICK-UP OVERNIGHT XX THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE ENCLOSED: One (1) Geotechnical Investigations PURPOSE/COMMENTS: Enclosed please find the above-referenced. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 3530 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 101 • San Diego, California 92108 • Telephone: (619) 283-2001 • Fax:(619)283-2010 Offices in: Santa Barbara, San Jose and San Francisco GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Cox California PCS Site SD149 - Downtown Carlsbad 1015 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California 3 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY June 27, 1996 Project No. 1642.1 , Log No. 2309 J. M. Consulting Group 3530 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 101 San Diego, CA 92108 Attention: Ms. Cheryl M. Hacke Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Cox California PCS Site SD149 - Downtown Carlsbad 1015 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California References: Attached Dear Ms. Hacke: In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation at the subject site. Our work was performed in June 1996. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate soil and geologic conditions, and provide grading and foundation recommendations for the proposed equipment storage area site. We understand that the antenna will be placed on the roof of the existing off ice'building-. v To assist with our investigation, we were provided with a Site Plan, prepared by your office, which has been utilized as the base for our Plot Plan, Figure 2. With the above in mind, our scope of work included the following: o Research and review of available pertinent geologic literature, maps, and plans (see References). o Subsurface exploration consisting of one hollow-stem auger boring to obtain soil and bedrock samples and observe subsurface conditions. o Laboratory testing. o Engineering and geologic analyses. o Preparation of this report providing the results of our field and laboratory work, analyses, and our conclusions and recommendations. 5245 Avenida Encinas, Suite G • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (619) 931-1917 • Fax (619) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 • (714) 487-9060 • Fax (714) 487-9116 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site consists of a specified easement within a landscaped area at the southeast corner of an existing parking lot located at 1015 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, California (see Location Map, Figure 1). Topographically, the site is relatively level. The site lies at an elevation of approximately 76 feet above mean sea level and is presently covered by grass. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Proposed construction consists of an equipment storage area. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored by excavating one hollow-stem auger boring to a depth of approximately 30 feet below existing site grades. The approximate location of the boring is shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. The subsurface exploration was supervised by an engineer from this office, who visually classified the soil and bedrock materials, and obtained bulk and undisturbed samples for laboratory testing. The soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Classifications are shown on the Boring Log, Figure 3. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on samples obtained during the subsurface exploration. Tests performed consisted of the following: o Dry Density and Moisture Content (ASTM: D 2216) o Expansion Index (ASTM: D 4829) o Direct Shear (ASTM: D 3080) o Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM: D 1557- 91A) Results of the dry density and moisture content determinations are presented on the Boring Log, Figure 3. The remaining laboratory test results are presented on Figure 4. . HETHERINGTOIM ENGINEERING, INC. N BASE MAP: U.S.G.S SAN LUIS REY 7-1/2 MINUTE QUADRANGLE SCALE: 1"=2000' LOCATION MAP HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS JMCG/COX - SD 149 DOWNTOWN CARLSBAD PROJECT NO. 1642.1 FIGURE NO.1 3 3 3 1 3 3 J GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 3 SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 1. Geologic Setting The subject site lies within a stretch of coastal hills that are contained within the coastal plain region of northern San Diego County, California. These coastal hills are characterized by numerous marine terraces of Pleistocene age that have been established and deposited above wave-cut platforms of the underlying Eocene bedrock. The terraces extend from areas of higher elevation several miles east of the site and descend generally west-southwest in a "stairstep" fashion down to the present day coastline. The site area is contained within the south-central portion of the USGS San Luis Rey 7-1/2 minute quadrangle. The proposed construction site is underlain by a minor amount of fill material associated with the existing asphalt concrete parking lot, Pleistocene age terrace deposits, and at depth by sedimentary bedrock deposits of the Eocene Santiago Formation. . .--' . --—. ' ' " Structurally, bedding within the terrace deposits is considered to be essentially massive. Active or potentially active fault zones within the general site region include the offshore extension of the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood, Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills, and the Elsinore, which are located approximately 5 miles southwest, 21 miles southwest, and 24 miles northeast from the site respectively. 2. Geologic Units a. Fills Fill soils within the proposed construction area consist of moist, loose to medium dense silty sand. The fill is approximately 2 feet thick and is not considered suitable for support of the equipment storage area in its existing state. b. Terrace Deposits Pleistocene age marine and non-marine deposits underlying the fill in the boring consist generally of moist to very moist, medium dense to dense orange to red brown clayey to silty fine sands. The geologic contact between the terrace deposits and underlying Santiago Formation appears to be at a depth of approximately 14 feet. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 4 c. Santiago Formation Sedimentary bedrock deposits of the Eocene Santiago Formation encountered beneath terrace deposits consist generally of moist, dense, olive brown to light gray silty fine to medium sandstone with occasional thin beds of olive gray claystone. 3. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 15.5 feet in the boring. It should be noted, however, that fluctuations in the amount and level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation, and other factors which may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. SEISMICITY The site is within the seismically active southern California region. There are, however, no known active or potentially active faults located ' within -or adjacent to the site. Active and potentially active fault zones within the general site region include the offshore extension of the Rose Canyon/Newport- Inglewood, offshore Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills, and the Elsinore, which are located approximately 5 miles southwest, 21 miles southwest, and 24 miles northeast from the site respectively. Strong ground motion could also be expected from earthquakes occurring along the offshore San Diego Trough, San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones, which lie approximately 30 miles southwest, 48 miles northeast, and 60 to 70 miles northeast, respectively. The San Clemente fault, which lies approximately 56 miles southwest of the site,, as well as numerous other offshore faults, could also cause strong ground motion. Seismic risks on-site are limited to ground shaking during seismic events on active faults in the region. The following table lists the known active or potentially active faults which would have the greatest impact on the site. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 5 Fault Rose Canyon/Newport - Inglewood (5 miles SW) Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills (21 miles SW) Elsinore (24 miles NE) Maximum Probable Earthquake (Moment Magnitude) 6.5 6.75 7.0 Estimated Bedrock Acceleration Peak 0.43g 0.19g 0.20g Repeatable 0.28g 0.19g 0.20g SEISMIC EFFECTS 1. Ground Acceleration The most significant probable earthquake to effect the site would be a 6.5 magnitude earthquake along the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood fault zone. Potentially, repeatable horizontal ground accelerations on the order of 0.28g are possible with a duration of strong ground motion exceeding 25 seconds. Peak (instantaneous) accelerations would be higher. 2. Liquefaction ; ^^- Liquefaction is not a potential site hazard due to the dense underlying terrace deposits and bedrock. 3. Landsliding Seismically induced landsliding is not considered a site hazard due the relatively level nature of the site. 4. Tsunamis Due to the relatively high elevation of the site and the distance of the site inland from the shoreline, seismically generated ocean waves are not considered a site hazard. HETHERIIMGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. General The proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Grading and foundation plans should take into account the appropriate geotechnical features of the site. 2. Slope Stability The proposed site consists of relatively level ground. Slope stability is therefore not a geotechnical engineering concern. 3. Site Grading Prior to grading, the site should be cleared of any existing vegetation and debris. The resulting debris should be disposed of at an approved location off-site. Existing fill in the equipment storage area should be removed down to terrace deposits and replaced as compacted fill to achieve design site grade. Removals should extend to at least 3 feet outside the limits of the proposed equipment storage area. Removals on the order of 2 feet below existing grade are anticipated. Actual removal depths should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer based on conditions exposed during grading. Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform horizontal lifts of 6 to 8-inches in thickness. All fill should,be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM: D 1557-91A. Soils used as compacted fill should be placed at about optimum moisture content. Rock fragments over 6-inches in dimension and other perishable or unsuitable materials should be excluded from the fill. All grading and compaction should be observed and tested as necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. 4. Foundation Recommendations Foundations for the equipment storage area should consist of conventional continuous footings founded at least 12 inches into either compacted fill or terrace deposits. Continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide and reinforced with a minimum of 2 - #4 bars top and bottom. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 7 Footings bearing as recommended may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot This value may be increased by one-third for loads including wind or seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth and a coefficient of friction between foundation soil and concrete of 0.40 i\\ay be assumed. These values assume that footings will be poured neat against the foundation soils. Footing excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Engineer to verify that they are founded in suitable bearing materials. Slabs-on-grade should be 4-inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of #3 bars placed at 18-inch centers in both directions. Reinforcement bars should be placed on chairs so that they are at mid-point of slab. Additional footing and slab reinforcement may be required by the Structural Engineer. Prior to placing concrete, the slab subgrade soils should be thoroughly moistened. 5. Grading and Foundation Plan Review Final grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant to confirm conformance with the recommendations presented herein or to modify the recommendations as necessary. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our investigation and further assume the • excavations to be representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our exploration are observed or appear to be present in excavations, the Geotechnical Engineer should be promptly notified for review and reconsideration of recommendations. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 1642.1 Log No. 2309 June 27, 1996 Page 8 This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Danny Cohen at the Carlsbad office. Sincerely, Danny Cohen Civil Engineer 41937 (expires 3/31/00) MDH;DC;BAB/sl randon A. Boka Registered Geologist 59 Certified Engineering G (expires 3/31/98) HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. REFERENCES City of Carlsbad, Geologic and Seismic Safety Element, dated March 1975. San Diego County, Topographic Survey Map, Sheet 362-1665, September 17, 1975. Eisenberg, Leonard I., 1983, Pleistocene Faults and marine terraces, Northern San Diego County, In "On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County," San Diego Association of Geologists, Edited by Patrick L. Abbott, 1985. Jennings, C.W. 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, and Adjacent Areas, California Division of Mines and Geology, Map No. 6. Kennedy, Michael P., 1975, Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Section A (Western San Diego Metropolitan Area), California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. Ploessel and Slossen, 1974, Repeatable High Ground Accelerations from Earthquakes, EERI Nomograph. Seed and Idriss, 1982, Ground Motion and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, EERI Nomograph. Weber, Harold F., Jr., 1982, Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and Related Geology of the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California, California Divisions of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 82-12LA. Alpha Laboratories Inc., January 23, 1981, Report of Preliminary Soils Investigation for the Chestnut Plaza Office Building to be Located at the Corner of Chestnut Avenue and Pio Pico Drive, Carlsbad, California. City of Carlsbad, Orthophoto Map, Sheet 39, Drawing No. 246-5, September -'October, 1988. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PROPOSED EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA PROPOSED ANTENNA LOCATION ON ROOF LEGEND Approximate Location of Boring SCALE: 1" = 25' SITE PLAN HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS JMCG/COX - SD149 DOWNTOWN CARLSBAD PROJECT NO. 1642.1 FIGURE NO. 10.0- 15.0- 20.0— 25.0— 30.0- 35.0- 115 J100/10' 114 91 82/8" DRILLING COMPANY: C&K Drilling BORING DIAMETER: 8" DRIVE VVEii i 1 1 LUUlU. ^^ :cHQL LUa 0.0 5.0— (if | OL XT" U) ^f1 en ^ LU n 1— E 0<E 0C/l U.\LU tn5 3H O CE -1o ca H <V*r ^ • 23n • 33n 1— HinzLUa £>M- 5- 0f£ 0.a *-• •i nolUo 103 105 "' i nub, >•:•"• -— ,\* LUQ£ h-'i ^* H™ LliCO 1—H Z2 s 5 0.O 2.7 2.3 $J ^*J • ' Cr CJS ^1 tkV* Pi 8 § $M Mobile B-53 DATE: 6/22/96 DROP:30"ELEVATION:76 ± 9.3 39.0 SO .I BORING NO. B-1 SOIL DESCRIPTION ,,... .i .rrrr?r5^1 brown silty sand, damp, loose (sod) ^*" I (© *-^ TN Hiw '-- < u^rK brown silty sand, moist, medium dense, roots —: Orange to red brown silty fine sand,aaftl«X dense to very dense grades to yellowish orange brown slightly clayey fine to medium sand, moist dense Formation) Olive brown to light gray sandstone, wet, dense, slightly micaceous 15.5' CMJve gray silty fine sandstone with occasional s of olive gray claystone, moist to wet, very dense ~-^^ drilling becomes more difficult refusal @ 27' Total Depth = 27 feet Groundwater @ 15.5' No Caving LOG HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, GEOTECHNICAL CONSULT ANTO JMCG/COX-SD149 1015 Chestnut Ave. Carlsbad PROJECT NO. 1642.1 FIGURE NO. EXPANSION (ASTM: D 4829) Sample Location B-l @ 1' B-l @ 3' Initial Moisture 9.6 8.1 Compacted Dry Density (pcf) 117 117 Final Moisture 13.0 12.3 Volumetric Swell 0.4 0 Expansion Index 4 0 Expansion Potential Very low None DIRECT SHEAR (ASTM: D 3080) Sample Location B-l @ 2' B-l @ 1' Cohesion (psf) 125 125 Internal Angle of Friction (°) 39° 35° Remarks Undisturbed, consolidated, saturated, drained Remolded, consolidated, saturated, drained SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM DENSITY/OPTIMUM MOISTURE DETERMINATIONS (ASTM: D 1557-91A) Sample Location Description Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content B-i e Brown silty sand 129.0 8.5 Figure 4 Log No. 2309 Project No. 1642.1 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. JUL-25-96 THU WESTERN TEL-COM PRODUCER (619)578-5200 ross Insurance Company 10670 Treena ST. #216 San Diego, CA 92131 Attn: Colleen LauHa THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Ext: COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE "ttwMn cbTtfen TagTe' Itis'J A INSURED •western Tel -Com Development, Inc. 42111 Avenida Alvardo Suite D Tcmecula, CA 92 590 COMPANY B OOMPANV Q _ . JJ COMPANY D THtSISTO CERTinnrHAT THE POLICtes OpNSURANCE LISTED BELOWHAVE BEeftlSSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVEFORTHE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, UMTS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. coLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE 'POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE ! POLICY EXPIRATION OATEIMM/OCVYY} : OAT? (MUWPP/YY)LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILfTY j CLAIMS MADE j I OCCUR OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT GENERAL AOQREGATE PRODUCTS • COUP/OP AGG PERSONAL £ AOV INJURY EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone nr«) MEO EXP (Any orw p«»«on) AU OM06ILB UABlLtTY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHeOULEO AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEO AUTOS COMBINED SINOL6 LIMIT 80DILYNJURY(Porpomn) BOOII.Y INJURY (P«t « PROPERTY DAMAGE OARACE LIABILITY AMY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY.' EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE EX ESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE WORKERS COMPENSATION M0 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ ; ...... 1 iNctpARTNERs/execunve i ...... ;OFFICERS AR£ 1 j EXCL -iTORYIMTS;JIM. NWC33937AOO 01/01/1996 01/01/1997 EL EACH ACOOENT EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT EL DISEASE - 6A EMPLOYee ai i!,ooo,poo 1,000,000 i,ogo,ooo_ OTHBR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LO^TWNS/VEKICLES/SPeClAL (THUS Contractor's State License Board Workers Compensation UnitP.O. Box 26000 Sacramento, CA 95826 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. TMC ItSUINo eaMTANY WILL ENDEAVOR TC7 MAII. Iff DAYS WRITTEM NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY. fTS AOENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE B33_fe63SQ« (00 -> CO OO2 o >o