The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1088 LAGUNA DR; ; CB901090; Permit.., ., B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB901090 Project No: A9000220 Development No: 08/24/90 11:15 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1088 LAGUNA DR Str: Fl: Ste: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADDITION/ALTERATION Parcel No: 155-272-19-00 Valuation: 4,500 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: I1A Class Code: Description: FIRE SEPARATION WORK/BLDG "A" OWNER *** : CHANGE OCCUPANCY FIRST FLOOR TO : VILLAS DE CARLSBAD Fees Required *** Fees: Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter 'Y' to Auto * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plu Enter "Y" for Ele Enter 'Y' for {1)2-140 'f ·-r-11. (1/"\ ,:;.,-.,J.J. • .; ·l.-<~J Status: Applied: I1A (CD) Apr/Issue: Validated By: ISSUED 06/28/90 ·08/24/90 CD Lie. OWNER Collected & Credits ,00 47.00 231.00 *** Ext fee Data INSP........__ 72.00 47.00 1. 00 158.00 Y 278.00 N N N CLEARANCE _____ , CITY OF CARLSBAD 2ff75 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 DATE: JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 CJ APPLICANT PLAN CHECK NO: 90-1090 S4,PP SET: :t:. D JURISDICTION r-, PLAN CHECKER [JFILE COPY nuPs r=' DESIGNER -·-' PROJECT NAME: Convert· Fi'rsi: Floor ;{p I Oc?"ffaacv / D D D 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: J"~,:; s &em~ 9(p09 Wop le$ Sf, I #=.;i.oo 5::.1\ Di e.cio 'f.;J/.;2 / . J ~ cc.~ g.,." Mc. e:1!f 12:+t 10&0 g+..bflve:. #:iio5 :s,.._" D,c:Jo q;;i.101 fljl Esgil staff did not advise the applicant co~tact person that plan check has been completed,~-~ .... by t\'\.o.il, D Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date contacted: ~~~~~~~~~-Telephone#~~~~~~~~- ' ... JURISDICTION: Ca..r[:,bqa Date plans received by plan checker: _______ _ PLAN CHECK NO.: CfO-toqo SUPPDate plan check completed: 7/z,.lfqo By: 4-ct {1 Lve.r: PROJECT ADDRESS: 108B LAJunA. Dr. TO: .T (Lr'Y\e-::. Roeoo ~,YI. 1 d I,4 c.c.: Re(\ 01 c. E: I I , · a±t: PLAN CORRECTION SHEEI FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. lbe plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. ~ -.. - The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS /"i'\ Please make all corrections on the original ~ tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: E~il G.cp, . ~ To facilitate checking, please identify, next \.J to each item, the sheet of the ,plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check. _____ Yes· ___ __,No ,{<: T{c,n,:; of coace.rn ,·t !tJJv/ec /we/ 1':, 4/q5s1[,'eo/ '2.S an I-I Pt::,:'.w,oe-o<=-y .. S-1. $bow «n ti<. plC<.ns <=<2rnohc..oc<. wd:in ,a.If r2£ t-h:e pcc;,v't's/pns r'"" I 1 $-;). ~ieuc Tabl:<:s 5-A al'ld ~-C. for Tht:s mr'r:.i::d oc~11pqncy- s-~-Proyjd,, a wid(... (o([t'd.;,rs f?e:t: Sec, 33&1 (c.). an a la.cm :sys±e.vn pu: Sec.-10p9, Form No. PCS.41390 ... ' .. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, ~A 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: ! PLAN C L..J nFILE COPY .._J r-:uPs !=~DESIGNER PLAN CHECK NO: SET: 1t: PROJECT ADDRESS: Io 'b 9, L-¥lt-C..uN19 ~yz · PROJECT NAME:_~(,,._.,,.o~N........,\)=-1;::_=\=h~I.__~l~s~r-~5.......,..o=o=,2~·_.__\~o_··_..,..._~o_c_c_. __ D D 0 0 D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified 68\.-0u..J are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck; The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil staff did not advise the app~icant contact person that plan check has been completed. [J Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ____________ _ Date contacted: Telephone# ---------~ REMARKS: -r'\tc , o;i., ~' N'fh • Atv:Q Sv'3 ':. ¢: c?,;brVI C.<,M .. 1t.1.;·~i10 /JS. ~ S&e1 '-WeTI,.t: ~\:l:LLk( S v,.-n:. E1 lSO, 'Tl:!(; oqJ:S"D'Il! 1,0, ,ve, 11"s:;Yl,:1 s %/<= "¢1;:}3':P e,.ooa.es.t;;O S:-'1 M ,w $\'V\ ,nt , 't.> l-1r\ !:. s\ I(, \~o Lo--m::""ta w lh=""Y2s r.,, 4-\4f.S F11VP•w6fs To Q~\..Vla' · "'ftto'5E:; ,T"t.-"'""Nl s, \F, J1:±€ By: ;:rrw, G,11 .. ,=,1-1-1~""" Enc osures : __________ _ ESGIL CORPORATION (!) \?L-'fht) 6 0GA DAA Dvw 0DM w---M~,S-M-11"\,J.--L-1:.-1~1.__~~=z.--- ?/11/ ·_/ l 8/23 PLAN CHECK 90-1090, 1088 LAGUNA Marty: You have copy of Villa De Carlsbad letter from Mike Smith. If you agree with its contents, please sign below, and we can issue the permit. DATE: , .. - 8-16-90 Sillman Wyman & Associates 10671 Roselle St. Ste 200 San Diego, CA 92121 Attention: James .Roemen PLAN REVIEW OF LAS VILLAS DE CARLSBAD IMPROVEMENTS 90-1090 Per our conversation of 8-6-90, this office approves the plan for construction of two 1-1 A occupancies on the first floor of building A. This approval is based in part on identical improvements in Building C which were approved by the State Fire Marshal. As you know The 1-1 A Occupancy will accomodate 6 or fewer clients of nor,-ambulatory status. Though Title 24 of the CAC requires direct or semi-direct exiting from each sleeping room, it was the State Fire Marshal's opinion and I concur that the additional protection in the form of automatic sprinklers, one- hour wall construction, supervised smoke detection devices and two-way egress via the corridor, provide at least as safe an environment as your clients would be afforded in a typical single family residential care home. OUTSTANDING P~N CHECK ITEMS, ESGIL CORP, 7-24-90 Since the UBC does not recognize the T-24 l-1A occupancy classification, This plan was reviewed as an I-{ occupancy in order to identify compliance issues. Those issues are as follows. S-1 CLEARED. Smoke barrier doors are not a requirement of an l-1A occupancy and are only required to provide separation and horizontal exiting from one licensed facility to the other. S-2 CLEARED. The requirement for one-hour floor separation is not ·appropriate unless the R-1 occupancy above is at risk from the 1-1 A occupancy below. · Because of like use, the existing floor assembly, automatic sprinklers and supervised smoke detection devices, it is the opinion of this office that the 1-1 A occupancy on the ground floor presents no more risk to second floor occupants than the existing apartments. ... S-3 CLEARED. According to plans, no shafts communicate between the proposed l-1A and the remainder of the building. S-4 CLEARED; Corridors 8 feet in width are not necessary, as the corridors will not be required to accomodate traffic in the form of hospital beds. S-5 CLEARED. An alarm system supervising each detection device in the rooms and corridors will be provided. Please comply with items checked on the attached plan check report and consider this letter a part of that plan review. MICHAEL E. SMITH Fire Marshal cc Marty Orenyak Kurt Culver, ESGIL Corp. Carter Darnell, Carlsbad Bldg Dept