Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1165 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB022128; Permit
10-16-2002 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB022128 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1165 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL $307,700.00t Sub Type: Lot#: Construction Type: Reference #: 1 Structure Type: 5 Bathrooms: CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, 636 SF GAR.97 SF DECK, 178 SF ENTRY SFD 0 VN SFD 4 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: ISSUED 07/18/2002 RMA 10/16/2002 10/16/2002 Applicant: WILLIAM SLATTERY JR 2585 PIO PICO DR 92008 760 729-4900 Owner: 8916 10/16/02 0002 01 02 29632-98 Total Fees: $30,373.98 Total Payments To Date:$741.00;Balance Due: $29,632.98 Building Permit •' Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee, Plan Check Discount; : Strong Motion Fee , Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFMFee '. Bridge Fee ;,. ' Other Bridge Fee t BTD#2Fee < BTD #3 Fee ' Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,187.20 Meter Size - : V'° $Q.QO~' -,,, Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee - • $771.68 •'"'/ .MeterFee: v x $0.00 SDCWA Fee -.. $0.00 CFD Bayoff Fee '" -430.77: - PFF •- - :':^> / \ $3,251.00" ..' PFF (CFD Fund)', $0.00 License Tax /•' ;) $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) ; $0.00 , Traffic Impact Fee „ >'" •;, $0.00; ''Traffic Impact^CFD Fuhci)/ . $0,'.00 , Sidewalk Fee' > $0;OOA v PLUMBING TOTAL- ;•/ ; $0.00 ' ' ELECTRICAL TOTAL *' $0.00'\ x MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 "-"'• Housing Impact Fee $3,420.00 Housing InLieu Fee ' D3/4 ]; 10 -Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee ' '•' , $0.00 Additional Fees . , ' •" ' TOTAL PERMIT FEES H x- $0.00 \ $160.00 $2,004.00 , $0.00 $5,600.14 $5,169.36 $0.00 $0.00 $451.20 $508.80 $0.00 ; $189.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,925.00 $0.00 $2,495.75 $2,060.00 $150.08 $30,373.98 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE trrat approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. FOR OFFICE USE O PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By. Date Business Name (at this addAddress (include Bldg/Suite #)07/18/02 0002 01 !"•*• iT-lM—.. Phase N8f "-J"r" Total # of unifV-c Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use 3370 Proposed Use5* Description of Work SQ. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms 760 727£o72* Name Address 3, APPLICANT D Contractor D Agent for Contractor I Ownerrn City Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone if Fax # Name 4, PROPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name Stata License #sro p/o 339 Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # ^^2033 Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _ 6, WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: l~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. n I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company _ Policy No. _ Expiration Date _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) S&\ CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollaj^te 1 oqXQfHrinraddition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Laboi ycode^ interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE C/^^^^U^} <~° t <^7 Utt" ^St^TTE/H J^-7jg*Cf^/d OV/Pi- DATE 'T/^/O ^ 1. OWNER-BUILDER DEjiLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: l~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). JQ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1 . I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES fJ]NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): __________^^_ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR N Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? l~l YES f~l NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? [H YES d NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(0 Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the buildina Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comipenced witfjjff 180 dgys from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comi APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE days (Section 106.4.4yniform Building Code) DATE /'AWHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Sent 8y: 6HL SLATTeftY S ASSO;760 729 6228; Aug-28-03 10:10AM; City of Carlsbad ISJSFarai&r A%»nue, Orfc*wdC«Kfc>mia 92«08 • INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTION RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB CALL PRIOR TO 2:00 P.M. FOR NEXT WORK DAY INSPECTION1; BUILDING INSPECTION: (76« 602-2723 Page 2/2 JOB ADDRESS: OWNERS NAME: „ USEfOCCUPANCY BUILOtNG ~O1HFR C6022128 -"1169 CHESTNUT AVCBAD 536 SF GAR.97 SF DSCK.178 SF EN' SFD V¥« HAM SLftTTCRY JR . CONTRACTOR LoW TypcoHnsjWction Pafr inspector TfffeK azFOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY' O G8OOT O WAU D8.«JNS Tilt PANELS POUR STRIPS OOIUMN fQQTJMCS SUBFRAME aruxw a CEILING 12 2irROOF SHEATHING EXT. SHUAKPANttS FRAME EXTERIOR LATH ZINTERIOR LATH & OKVWAU RN.41 fWMUNC D SEWER AND Bl/CO O Pl/CO SJ- UKDERGROUND a WATER TOP OUT OWASIE DWAtt-K TUB AftlO SHOWOt PAN DGASPIHNG U WATtS HJATtS a SOLAR WATER RNA1 tLKTSKAl P EUCtRIC UNIKKCnOUNO ^ITUFER KOl^H ttEOHC WMI5 ROUGH EtECTRICCSUiviG a etecTRic SERVICE QTEMPORAKV Q BONDING O fOQl RHAl MKHAKtCAl « JNDCRGROUNO DUCTS & HMMG Q DUCT . PfPiNC HEAT -AJKOOND- SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS HNAL {7S» 4JB-273J Ext 7151 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/26/2003 Permit* CB022128 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, Description: 636 SF GAR.97 SF DECK.178 SF ENTRY Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 1165 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WILLIAM SLATTERY JR Owner: Remarks: KEY IS IN ELEC PANEL Phone: 7608020079 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: BILL Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment fff Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02327 ISSUED SLATERY RES 165SF W.I. CLOSET; OVER DINING ROOM Inspection History Act Insp CO PY Date Description 08/19/2003 89 Final Combo 07/01/2003 89 Final Combo CO PD 03/14/2003 82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test AP PY 03/07/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 03/07/2003 16 Insulation AP PY 03/07/2003 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 03/03/2003 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PY 03/03/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywall WC PY 03/03/2003 24 Rough/Topout AP PY 03/03/2003 34 Rough Electric PA PY 03/03/2003 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 01/29/2003 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 01/29/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service AP PY 01/29/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service AP PY 01/03/2003 15 Roof/Reroof AP PY Comments GLASS DOORS @ FIREPLACE SEAL LOG LIGHTER. GFI @ KITCHEN COUNTER RANGE HOOD VENT EMR SEWER LINES (2) ONE FOR FUTURE HOUSE Inspection List Permit*: CB022128 Type: RESDNTL SFD Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 08/26/2003 89 ' 08/26/2003 89 08/19/2003 89 08/19/2003 89 07/01/2003 89 03/14/2003 82 03/07/2003 14 03/07/2003 16 03/07/2003 44 03/03/2003 14 03/03/2003 17 03/03/2003 24 03/03/2003 34 03/03/2003 44 01/29/2003 13 01/29/2003 22 01/29/2003 22 01/03/2003 15 11/26/2002 11 11/25/2002 11 11/19/2002 21 11/19/2002 31 11/18/2002 11 11/18/2002 12 11/18/2002 21 11/18/2002 31 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Insulation Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Shear Panels/HD's Sewer/Water Service Sewer/Water Service Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Underground/Conduit-Wirin Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Underground/Under Floor Underground/Conduit-Wirin PY PY - PD PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY Rl AP CO Rl CO AP AP AP AP PA we AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP CA AP we we we CO : WC CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, 636 SF GAR,97 SF DECK.178 SF ENTRY Comments KEY IS IN ELEC PANEL GLASS DOORS @ FIREPLACE SEAL LOG LIGHTER. GFI @ KITCHEN COUNTER RANGE HOOD VENT CALL WITH AN ETA EMR . } SEWER LINES (2) ONE FOR FUTURE HOUSE UNCOVER PIPES Thursday, August 28, 2003 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/19/2003 Permit* CB022128 Title: CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, Description: 636 SF GAR,97 SF DECK.178 SF ENTRY Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 1165 CHESTNUT AV Suite: . Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WILLIAM SLATTERY JR Owner: Remarks: CALL WITH AN ETA Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 760802D079 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: BILL Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02327 ISSUED SLATERY RES 165SF W.I. CLOSET; OVER DINING ROOM Inspection History Comments EMR Date 07/01/2003 03/14/2003 03/07/2003 03/07/2003 03/07/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/03/2003 11/26/2002 11/25/2002 Description 89 82 14 16 44 .14 17 24 34 44 13 22 22 15 11 11 Final Combo Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Insulation Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Shear Panels/HD's Sewer/Water Service Sewer/Water Service Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act CO AP AP AP AP PA we AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP CA lns| PD PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY SEWER LINES (2) ONE FOR FUTURE HOUSE *•/ £, CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE LOCATION PERMIT N'. ^ . FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHEST INFORMATION, CONTACT - YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® :*'-•<City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/01/2003 Permit* CB022128 Title: CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, Description: 636 SF GAR.97 SF DECK.178 SF ENTRY Inspector Assignment: PY 1165 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT WILLIAM SLATTERY JR Owner: Remarks: Phone: 7607294900X102 Inspector- Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: BILL Entered By: ROBIN Act Comment CO fflA (2- Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02327 ISSUED SLATERY RES 165SF W.I. CLOSET; OVER DINING ROOM Inspection History CommentsDate 03/14/2003 03/07/2003 03/07/2003 03/07/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 03/03/2003 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/03/2003 11/26/2002 11/25/2002 11/19/2002 Description 82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 16 Insulation ' 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 24 Rough/Topput 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 13 Shear Panels/HD's 22 Sewer/Water Service 22 Sewer/Water Service 15 Roof/Reroof 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor Act AP AP AP AP PA we AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP CA AP Insp PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY SEWER LINES (2) ONE FOR FUTURE HOUSE CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE DATE ' 1-^ V ' LOCATION PERMIT. NO. •A -T EX r (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TNV1E tf ' AT W ' FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR RiMTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT C^ %- " % YES BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER © City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/03/2003 Permit# CB022128 Title: CHESTNUT HOMES-3370 SF, Description: 636 SF GAR.97 SF DECK.178 SF ENTRY Sub Type: SFD Inspector Assignment: PY 1165 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT WILLIAM SLATTERYJR Owner: Remarks: AM EARLY PLEASE Phone: 7608012518 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: TODD Entered By: ROBIN CD Description 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/WeSding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 44 , Rough/Ducts/Dampers Act Comment v — iM -rfn£ r>l<r~ &JM\f Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02327 ISSUED SLATERY RES 165SF Date 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/29/2003 01/03/2003 11/26/2002 11/25/2002 11/19/2002 11/19/2002 11/18/2002 11/18/2002 11/18/2002 11/18/2002 Inspection History Description Act 13 Shear Panels/HD's ' AP 22 Sewer/Water Service AP 22 Sewer/Water Service AP 15 Roof/Reroof AP 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA 21 Underground/Under Floor AP 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring WC 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC 12 Steel/Bond Beam WC 21 Underground/Under Floor CO 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring WC W.I. CLOSET; OVER DINING ROOM Insp Comments PY PY PY SEWER LINES (2) ONE FOR FUTURE HOUSE PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY UNCOVER PIPES PY CITY OP CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-270$? 1635 FARADAY AVENUE; TIME •"&.' LOCATION, PERMIT W6 fi^h^ /vA/gT J (j^ferhff kg*^ U ^fey g> £vujfta^±-^ At -••• :-m' • ••.'•*•.••; — 'FOR IN8P.ECTJON£ALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE?= i •// / ft r J i-FOR F^RIHER:INFv®RWATI®N, CONTACT .. BUILDING INSPECTOR ••• YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® IFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, II 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713 NOTICE OF EXCAVATION INSPECTION JOB LOCATION:. C. i :t'^,K WORK ORDER NO.:. MOO *REF. WORK ORDER NO.:. OWNER OR CONTRACTOR: DATE INSPECTED:. TYPE OF EXCAVATIONS: CONTINUOUS FOOTING _ I CAISSON _ _FRICTION PILE _ SWIMMING POOL DESCRIPTION OF EXCAVATIONS COVERED BY THIS NOTICE: SPREAD FOOTING. OTHER. t rJL/A 11H^r- J-jrt /•, ^ ,; i , <, ' rf >:- The undersigned bias inspected the excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated in accord- ance with our recommendations in the preliminary foiAdation report and the Building Code of the "j» /^ f'. DISTR: (1) Office (2) inspector (3) Project RV- SIGNATUR Form-79 PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "G" SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 TELEPHONE (858) 576-9110 CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JOBNO'*****01/1 f/0 9 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF D REINFORCED CONCRETE D STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY D S.PRAY-APPLIEC^FIHEPROOFING D PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE D REINFORCED GYPSUM [ D REINFORCED MASONRY D DEEP FOUNDATION PLAN FILE NUMBER DESCRIBE MATt (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE I MFQR., WELD-ROD. ETC.)GENERAL CONTRACTOR /" Vss ftt/*CONTR.REPORTED WORK'/ ., * A, , t4/ttM/tl y -AMf LAB. RECEIVING » TESTING CONSTR. MATL. SAMPLES INSPEC- TION- DATE ARRIVAL TIME.DEPARTURETIME DETAILED REPORT OF WORK INSPECTED LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. WORK REJECTED. JOB PROBLEMS. PROGRESS. REMARKS. ETC.ICUn»MK*UATONMOtff-MllCUNTtOFIUTEIUALPU^D<MWOM<PeRFOIMCO:NUMt*COM«CTMNi(W|U)*U«Of.H.T.KXTITO)MUCD|CHfCXCD:tTC. II /ll HttA /Wx wtfttM: ma /AJ UJ/J/IJ^ JuJ ts/ffr fa//) /J HO& • /I } K./fM/tl 4 MSPECTOR <MNTaftrv»f) SIGNATURE (_1 DATE SBNED/J / j Jl ERTf CATE NO. / CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plans specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opin ion or project control. EsGii Corporation In Tartnership with, government far Quitting Safety DATE: October 1, 2002 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad . vS-J2kA*TREVlEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2128 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: Slatterly Residence | 1 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. B The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. I | The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: B Esgir Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: r\ b: ) Fax #: -Person acted: r\ (by: ) / J ^JL^-lephon^-' / -Fax In Perso REMARK^ OK to issue with the designer and the structural consultant sign the appropiate , the electrical plan on page 12 has had some outlets added, (see red dots) By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation n GA D MB D EJ D PC 9/23/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 ^ (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Quitting Safety DATE: September 3, 2002 OAPgjJpANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad S-PtAtfREVlEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2128 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: Slatterly Residence \~\ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. H The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bill Slatterly 2585 Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 I I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. • Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bill Slatterly Telephone #: 760 729 4900 x102 Date contacted: 9 MO*. (by:£*x) Fax #: 760 729 6226 Mail —^Telephone Fax^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 8/26/02 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2128 September 3, 2002 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2128 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/26/02 September 3, 2002 REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes aNo Carlsbad O2-2128 September 3, 20O2 • PLANS NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). This may be a leftover item. - FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 15. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer that shows the building's address. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. None submitted at this time. - FRAMING 24. The structural consultant shall review and approve the truss design through manual signature. A letter of review is sufficient. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) These next four items (#38-41) were not returned with the submittal, unable to find corrections in the submittal. 38. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20-ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). Carlsbad 02-2128 September 3, 2002 39. Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 40. For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210- 52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 41. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with NEC Art. 210-52(h), which reads as follows: For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be required. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partners/lip with Qovtrn.me.nt for Quitting Sa.fe.ty DATE: July 30, 2002 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad ChPhAM^VIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2128 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: Slatterly Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. B The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bill Slatterly 2585 Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 I I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. B Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bill Slatterly ( v. M ) Telephone #: 760 729 4900 x102 Date contacted:"} J3ofo^ (by: ^ ) Fax #: 760 729 6226 Mail <—Telephone •— Fax ^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/22/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 02-2128 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue FLOOR AREA: See Below Dwelling Garage Decks Entry REMARKS: 3337' 636' 97' 178' STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 27' at rear elev. page 3 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: July 3O, 2002 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/22/02 PLAN REVIEWER: Bryan Zuppiger FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when vou submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 4. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including dwelling. Section 106.3.3. Differs from the application. 5. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. 6. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (trusses, etc.). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." The truss plans do not match the framing plan. 7. Please burn all handwritten notes into final plans. See owner's name on title sheet. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 8. Guardrails (Section 509.1) & Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". • ROOFING 9. Specify on the plans the following information for the balcony deck materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Deck slope. 10. Show roof drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. City of Carlsbad policy 84-35. 11. Show the required ventilation for attics. The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. 12. Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof sheathing. To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required 1" clearance, member sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists. Section 1505.3. 13. Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension." Section 1505.3. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 14. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. Plans state two layers of %" on page 2/note 2, unable to locate this assembly in reference materials, please clarify. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 15. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer that shows the building's address. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 3O, 2OO2 16. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 17. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (was required by the soil report on page 8). 18. Dimension all foundations per U.B.C. Table 18-l-C: Floors SuDDorted* 1 2 Footing Thickness 6" 7" Width 12" 15" Deoth 12" 18" Stemwall 6" 8" *Foundations may support a roof in addition to the floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. The chart on page 5 shows a 12" interior footing for 2 stories. 19. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per Section 1806.6.1: a) Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor bolt. 20. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 21. Call out all pad sizes on the foundation plan. • FRAMING 22. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The truss plans do not match the framing plan. 23. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." 24. The structural consultant shall review and approve the truss design through manual signature. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 25. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2x6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2x4 max. 14', 2x6 max. 20'. Table 23-IV-B. 26. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. 27. Please check the window header supporting the girder truss in the living room. 28. Call out all the hip and ridge member sizes on the plans. Please provide analysis of same. 29. The type 3 shear wall at Line 1, floor level, has been reduced on the plans in width. This exceeds the allowable shear load for this type of wall. 30. Please detail all second story shear hardware. 31. Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs. 32. Specify nail size and spacing for floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 23-II-E-1. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 33. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 34. Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. Section 307, UMC. 35. Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed, not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. 36. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Sections 306.3 and 306.4, UMC. 37. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 38. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20-ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 39. Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 40. For a single-family dwelling unit, show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 41. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with NEC Art. 210-52(h), which reads as follows: For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be required. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 02-2128 July 30, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO.: O2-2128 PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: July 30, 2002 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION dwelling garage decks entry Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 3337 636 97 178 cb Valuation Multiplier City Estimate By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 307,700 307,700 Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: CH Repetitive Fee ^1 Repeats Complete Review D Other [—I Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgil Plan Review Fee $1,187.20 $771.68 $664.83 Comments: Sheet of macvalue.doc DATE: Citvof Carlsbad Public Works - Engineering BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST NCHECK NO.: BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:- 3/6 ~EST. VALUE: #30?. 7*0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please se/ymfe attached report of deficiencies marked wnplD.^/lake necessary corrections to plans or specivfcajiens for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By:Date: Date: RIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application [3 Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet u Sewer Fee Information Sheet Name: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Karen Saul City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: . (7^.602-2720 - FAX (760) 602-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3RD D SITE PLAN 1 • Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures Existing Street Improvements Property Lines Easements 2. Show on site plan: EL Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths . Existing or proposed sewer lateral Jff Existing or proposed water service Existing or proposed irrigation service / / Drainage Patterns 1 . Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." & Proposed Slopes and Topography , type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: Site address sessor's Parcel Number if Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION HAWORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bu«dinQ Planciwck CWsl Fom (Gen«lc).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3rd DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE Q 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. D D D 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/£" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:\WORD\DOCaCHKLST\Building Planctieck Cklst Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00).<Joc .. ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: D D D 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. G n 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiWing Planctwck Cktat Form (Generic 7-U-OO) doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST I ST 9ND 3RD ^ Q n 7d .No Grading Permit required. Z] O D 7e- 'f Qrading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: _________ D D 9- INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: _ Date: D D 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. quired fees are attached No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with-pP^service.& , r-i a •&•& *. \ a/iotaHi \®UNkM^JL* H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLS1ABuJdinQ Pbndwdt Cklst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ^ ST jRD D • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiUing Planctw* CMst Forni <Generic).Ooc Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST i ST OND service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. D D D 12c- Irrigation Use (where recycled water Is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. / D J Cj D 13- Additional Comments: ^——'^ As»^isi .* (~> t> ^^-rft^ /^ Jis\ —^* ,* / sL6H/4' ^LS 3?) H:\WORD\OOCS\CHKLST\Building Plandw* Octet Form (Genertc).doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: //&*o C. Prepared bv: /L^^ EDU CALCULATIONS: 9t^*TvpesofUse: c/A-* Tvoes of Use: APT CALCULATIONS: TvoesofUse: %F£ Types of Use: FEES REQUIRED: /^eS~fr1C^< fW£f Blc|a- Permit No. Date: &/L3~/^ — Checked bv: / & List types and square footages for all uses. — So. Ft/Units: So. Ft/Units: List types and square footages for all uses. Sa. Ft/Units: Sa. Ft./Units: f y^s t-^y *"* e; Date: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: ^-^cs^r ( / WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) LB-T. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT: NO PARK AREA & #: X NO. UNITS:=$ . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS:/FEE/APT:=S . BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 . ADT's/UNITS: m 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: IS 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: / BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: X FEE/ADT: ZONE: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: DIST. #3. =$_ =$ FEE/EDU: D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) E"^7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ACRES: * (jjl ®T 8. POTABLE WATER FEES HIGH /LOW =$_ =$_ X FEE/AC: 5.1 >£"" UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE / 7W METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc 1 Of 2 Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2 of 2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc . Rev. 7/14/00 .10:215 FAI 7604384178 PROJECT INSPECTOR: PROJECT ID PD * i - CIIYOFCARLSBAD CRY OF CARLSBAD GRADWO INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SHE RELEASE PATE:«l GRADING PERMfT MQ. LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE- N/A « NOT APPLICABLE VSCOMPLETE 0 = INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE 1st IS* t/ IS ts~ fs 'is- (/ *fa f I/ 2nd. 1. Site access to requested tots adequate and togteafy grouped, 2. SHttroslon control measures adequate. 3. Overall sits adequate for health, safety and wtffitft of pubic. 4. utter of request tor partial release submitted. 5. 8 V4'X11'sft9 plan (attachmenl) shewing r»qu«« tote lubmitted. 6. Compaction report from sols engineer submitted. 7. Engineer of Wcxt certification of work don* andpadttevalfoni. 8. OsotoQtetngln*^* tetter If urw»ualgec4c^te or sute 9. Project cond«kx«c* approve checked for oon(ld». 10. flrt hydrante vwtWo 500 feet of bufcBngeombusUbJwandal weather roads access to sta. Partial release of grading for the above stated lob b approved for to purpose of fauldhQ pent* issuance. Issuance of building permits is s« subject to al normal City requirements required pursuant to the buMhg permit process, O Partial retease of Ihe sMe Is denied for the (blowing reasons; r- *2,/. -Prejed Inspector Construction Manager PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: Greg Fisher Address Phone (760) 602-4629. - 9J? Type of Project & Use: .5 Zoning: f^ ~ * General Plan: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: ~*4 Uriel Project Density:DU/AC Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net dev acres: _ Circle One ^or non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Legend: ^ Item Complete [~~1 Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: I I Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES N0_ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact _jb6m at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-237J Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: NO \D Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required:YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES _ (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, ^nter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 D CD CH Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed'.structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines >I\ 1. Applicability: YES_ Y\i NOvv 2. Project complies YESjJ. Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: 2. Accessory structure set Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation: \ NO \ Required Required Required Required Required :backs: Required Required Required Required^ Required *3f\ ' --7 3JF\S\*J Shown / &\.S £.-&" Shown 6.&" v*x /"?///• Shown " ' ' •** Shown *^ ^ Shown JS Shown S Shown / Shown Shown Shown 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: 5. Parking: Required ^fc Required —Shown I/to'1 Spaces Required Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367 W • b^A_ JOB NO. BY DATE SH. OF P. ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENOINEERINO 2861 BRIGHTON RD., CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH. (780) 434-4067 FAX (760)434-3367 William Slattery's Rear Lot Home, Chestnut St. Carlsbad, Ca. JOB NO. BY DATE SH.JL OF _& DESIGN CRITERIA Building Code Foundation Soil Concrete Concrete Block Reinforcing Steel Structural Steel Pipe Column Wood Framing Studs Joists Beams Posts GLB Plywood DESIGN LOADS Lateral Wind Seismic Live Loads (psf) Dead Loads R/FIr Finish Insulation Sheathing Jsts / trusses Bott. Misc. D.L.(p«f) T.L(p«f) :1997 :2000psf per soil report :2500psi :ASTMC90,GRAOEN : ASTM A615-40 or A615-60 as noted :ASTMA36 :ASTMA53,GradeB rStutf Grade :DF#2 :DF#1 :DF#1 (6x),Stud Grade (4x) :24F-V4 : P.S. 1-85 Exterior Glue :(CeXCq)(qs)(l) :ZICa/R 18.5 PSF 0.293 ROOF FLOOR 14 1.5 4.5 3 1.5 26 42 40 4 1.5 3 3.5 3 1.5 16.5 56.5 DECK 60 6 3 3.5 8 1.5 22 82 P*. finu cs^ffc? *9fdfc0 wr«»TrTit*S»4r ADRIANA ORAOUS CONSULTING n x I . ,, ^ r \fce^Lrt Ik**, £K 2981 W«OHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA. «2008 PH (780) 43*4087 FAX (780) 434-3387 CU- *» *>• ^ pare - M =YT A // *.VIA ADRIAN* DRAGUS CONSULTING ft^y l^T U*u, e_ £L e<1V\w.1~<Jt~ Joe NO. STRUCTURAL DKHNentMo /> , , j r 2081 BRIGHTONRD.CARLSBAD,CA.f2008 C^K b^cK f CA . PH (760) 434-4087 FAX (760) 434-3387 P=t> / ADWANA ORAGU3 CONSULTING •IKUUIIMMLDNMNEERINO 2981BWOKTON TO. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780) 4344367 / Lai l-Uuc. £h«<tvJr JOB NO. MlsLg. AOFOANA DRAGUS CONSULTINO Ssf . jo« NO. If 2e8lBraOHTDNMD.CAKL8BAO,CSA.t20M PH(TOO)43M067 FAX(700)4344387 BY DATE ADWANADRAGU3 CONSULTING AO^M^^HA^MAA M^^^^^^^B^^^^.^^•nWCTMML EmmEERMO 2a01MamTONm>. CARLSBAD, CA.t20W PH(790)434-*0«7 FAX (780) 4344387 BY DATE HuV - 4> e>..., *... 4/2- s?' * t. ADfOANA ORAOU3 CONSULTING S1RUCIURML ENQMEBRMQ 2881 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. §2006 PH (7*0)434-4087 PAX (790) 434-3307 AOmANADRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ewwNBEWNo 28B1BfWHTONm>.CARL8BAO,CA.«200e PH (780)434-4087 FAX (780) 434-3387 BY «t>if **<s) PL'--5 ^ ' ADWANA DRAOUS CONSULTING fleet* 2881 eRMHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA.fBX» Af , ^ DATE 4^3 -<a PH (780) 434-4087 PAX (780)434-3387 SH.i^OFj.7 R A 4>£,oti-^=:. PA-^S' ^ AT Af 4 6 . \ t V vJ , ^.^ ^ *.<MMJ..* £ ADWAMADRAGU3 CONSULTING Re<xr U>t- fBfl^hAfl •^•^^M^BM^^MaJhURAL BmMIEEKMO ^ i I _/ /" 2891 HWrnONMXCAKL8aAO,CA. 12008 Oofl^*^ ( O. PH(TOO)4344087 MX(780)434^387 8H.JJoF__/7 ^ 8 ADWANA DRAGUS CONSULTING „ ^••••^liHkMBiAfl gMyu^^^M^^^uf^K y91 VUMTTwnML BH9llfcCIUNU INI tfeOHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 FAX (780) 434-3387 Ut" JOB NO. BY 08 SH.JO-OF_n R ^' P, ;**'-' K-taf/, x = . ^.|K//..4 - •< « /». g //.f * ^-^ z-z^^\»,^i<i>^(-i\. = /•f••/f,•fs^. t ' ' -AnYl'*- -'**• r -^^//'^ * ^~ **/^'^/^ « I'2' x /i/-u^ J.B^/.-f.^r- 10 /t / 0.41 A ADWANADRAGUS CONSULTING Lot CV\ PM(7W)434-4M7 PAX (7W) 434-338?08 II R. *(I ' ••£. -EL.PHC _a a^. /t fi/^ ft Fm ^ l?tR ,fA£t£ X /< x ^ * Oy A AORMMA DRAOU8 CONSULTING f>H(7W)4*MO«r FAX (780) 434-3367 DATE ~ R *-/fret Q (? VJ/ ^ ^ o. g 3 h S $ (9 +t 8 ADWAHADRACttW CONSULTING Lot -f <we MtiaaMMTOHKD.CAHL8BAD.CA.t200» PH (790) 43*4097 FAX (790)434-3387 Pt- F (o ro ^ <? K- If I v -7 7.* a./ 1,1-1 ^s^:^ JOftNO. BY A 14-1 47.. ^.p — uO. - o -3.2. kOMANA DRAOU8 CONSULTINQ WWlWOHTONWXCAKL88AD.CA.tJOW MX (780) 434*3387 / JOB NO. DATE 8H. /, • — 2- ADR1ANA ORAGU3 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL BNOMURINQ 2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA.K008 PH (760) 434-4067 PAX (760) 434-3387 U»t , C SH.J20FJ7 eN . I > j/, (H *l OJ,KIO« »8,^io<jr< i.W ^ 42. M u) ^, - It.* $-7 / l^t^. I • I ADMANA DKAQUS CONSULTING Ut ffo * I ,JOB no. m\ •WHTONRD.CAKLSBAD.CA. 92008 PM(7W)434-«Oer FAX (780) 434-3397 PATE 8H OF ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2661 BRIGHTON RD., CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH. (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367 William Slattery's Rear Lot Home, Chestnut St. Carlsbad , Ca. JOB NO. BY SH.J_ OF t"7 DESIGN CRITERIA Building Code :1997 Foundation Soil :2000psf per soil report Concrete :2500 psi Concrete Block :ASTM C90.GRADE N Reinforcing Steel : ASTM A61 5-40 or A61 5-60 as noted Structural Steel :ASTM A36 Pipe Column : ASTM A53, Grade B Wood Framing Studs :Stud Grade Joists :DF#2 Beams :DF#1 jTCfr* ' mF ^^^c y Jr\j$^ ^ ^Ws^sV^ff&fcS'J^ Posts :DF#1 (6x),Stud Grade (4x) //S/^ ^"^ GLB :24F-V4 Ifei NO.CC DKji«M*M«J .BO A OC £?»**%»:*«» ^M. .A 11 % EXP. rffPlywood : P.s. i-oo exterior Glue Vk \/E£&5F1 w¥ Mralsl8*i DESIGN LOADS Lateral Wind : ( Ce)( Cq)(qs)( 1) Seismic : ZICa/R ROOF fo°f iJf Live Loads igTfcUiS [^ (psf) Dead Loads R/FIr Finish 14 1 4 Insulation 1.5 -^ Sheathing 1.5 I. ^ Jsts / trusses 4.5 ^ • "> Bott. 3 Misc. 1.5 — D.L(psf) 26 '6 T.L(psf) 42 34 ^ ^^V^>L^>£OF^^SsjL. 18.5 PSF 0.293 FLOOR DECK 40 60 4 6 1.5 3 3 3.5 3.5 3 8 1.5 1.5 16.5 22 56.5 82 kJ/flTr * tic P _L^A !*} £3>ft *f T> U C|^*V | W •• *V **"*i*F> i^ *•' W |^ 1 \WU * Ki^eriC.KJ uiH-B-W ASCUktS (*u ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL BNOINCERINO 2881 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH (780) 434-4067 FAX (780) 434-3387 £•*- ^ / 2 i f * - '•*•*• Y ' A) /?-. A2.7 /O •*»>*>. ^DATE - S i\ . . * V ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING f^y \_£ M-* ^ STRUCTURAL eNOINECRINa 2061 BRIGHTON RO. CARLSBAD, CA. WOW PH (7BO) 434-4087 FAX (760) 434-3387 ^ ,C AIT | C /, R. ic, . U/n ^ ADR1ANA DRAOUS CONSULTING 81RUCIUMAL BNOINECRINO 2881 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780) 434-3387 ADRIANA ORAOU3 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENOINeeRINO 2881 BRIGHTON RO. CARLSBAD, CA. 92006 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780)434-3367 CAesf* u,f Sf . JOB NO. "?° BY fa? DATE ; ADWANADRAGUS CONSULTING 2681 BRIGHTON KD. CARLSBAD, CA. «2008 PH (780) 434U087 FAX (7W) 434-8387 . * \ <-- "/ BY DATE f-21-0 I- £* I.J>OF_I7 3^-7 1-7 1 / '2. . n ADRIANA DRAOUS CONSULTING • ! RUC ! URAL CNOMEERINO 2981 BW8HTON TO. CARLSBAD, CA.f20(M PH (780) 434-4067 FAX (780) 434-3387 OA fc£Wf<3f"J0i w, BY SH.j&OF_l7 « 1 . Af.t; T3 - \Q L ADWAMA DRAOUS CONSULTS STRUCTURAL eNomeenmo 2881 BRKJHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA.t2008 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780) 4344387 IW Ut -H BY hrt> DATE SH. .fj. OF _J 7 I - *I .'' K /.#=» , v f ',/ rA, /*-<». ADRJANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL BNOMEBRMO 2881 BRJOHTONRO. CARLSBAD. CA,t20M PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780) 4944387 . BY A"f> DATE s 4x R Af (2 ^ /, Oc AOTOANA DRAQU8 CON8ULT1NQ • I RUC1 URAL ENOmttMNO rniBRMHTONKD. CARLSBAD, CA.920M PH (TOO) 434-4067 FAX (780) 434-3967 X1 O. ) .V Ubirt. .r -* -^^ BT DATE r SH.JJ OF_/7 *t,/ o 8 ^ F x- *. 2^ 2 ~ l ADMMIADRAGU3 CONSULTING , •VP^MMMMBAft •^U^MMBa^H^Mh '•nfUvTvnNh •nonuiuunu 2881 BMOJHTON HD. CMtlttAD, CA. 02001 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX(780)4344387 08 tfc CD _!L«A (?) & ft s Ms 7 X ^ x ADWANADRAOU3 CONSULTING 209iaraOHreNRD.eAKL8BAO.eA.f20M m (WO) 434-4087 FAX (700)434-3367 JOB NO w DATE R c. i >.t £3 Bel ADWANA DRAOU3 CONSULTTNO STRUCTURAL eNomeeRMO 2M1 1WOHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA, 92000 PH (700) 434-4007 FAX (700) 4344387 Ft P (o K- -id1 )f f. V •7 7.+ //,/ 1,1-1 /a 9. $-3. BY DATE W-P2A 1** -/. -1.T. AOMIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING •muen 2891BMOHTON TO. CAKL8BAO, CA. 92008 PH (7*0)434^067 PAX (790)494^987 r 7 LA SH.JJ&OFJ7 3.57 +.t>/3<=> =» a /!T3 /Q ADR1ANA DRAGUS CONSULTING • I RUCTURAL CNOMREKINO 2981 BRIGHTON RO. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (780) 434-3367 Ut , C c \ ^ -tax - If.* io /3 ADMANADftAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL INOMUIUNO 3091 BRMHTONRD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH(7eO)4»M00r PAX (700)4344387 bATE SH OF Hi -2 -~ a * 0. 0.100 r ~ -Il*«A )* -- >, COMPUTRUS, INC. 10370 Hemet Street, Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92503 (909)343-1302 STRUCTURAL TRUSS CALCULATIONS LAS PLUMAS LUMBER JOB #5075 CHESTNUT I The truss calculations, previously stamped and bound within this report, have been reviewed and approved as indicated by the engineer's wet seal below. This approval applies to bound pages only. From: Nancy_Eissler@dca.ca.gov Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:29 PM To: scott@computrus.com Subject: Signing and Sealing Civil Engineering Documents Dear Mr. Carroll: This message is in response to your telephone inquiry to the California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors regarding the signing and sealing of civil engineering documents. Business and Professions Code section 6735, as amended effective January 1,2001, addresses the signing and sealing of civil engineering documents. This section requires all civil engineering plans, calculations, specifications, and reports (collectively referred to as "documents" to be prepared by or under the responsible charge of a licensed civil engineer and to include the civil engineer's name and license number. All interim documents must also include a notation as to their intended purpose, such as "preliminary" or "for plan check/review only." All plans and specifications that are permitted or that are to be released for construction (in other words, those that are final) must include the signature, seal or stamp (with the expiration date), and the date of signing and sealing/stamping; if these plans or specifications have multiple sheets, the signature, seal/stamp, and date of signing/sealing must be on each sheet. All final calculations and reports must also include the signature, seal or stamp (with the expiration date), and the date of signing and sealing/stamping; however, the specifications, calculations, and reports may be bound and then only the title sheet, cover sheet, or signature page needs to be signed and sealed (with the date of signing and sealing). The seal and signature may both be applied to the documents electronically, if the professional engineer so chooses. There is also nothing in the laws which would prevent a professional engineer from making copies of the signed and sealed sets of drawings; the law does not require that each "photocopy" of the original drawings contain an original signature and seal. This Code section, as well as the rest of the Professional Engineers Act (Business and Professions Code section 6700, "et seq.) and the Board Rules (Title 16, California Code of Regulations section 400, et seq.), may be obtained from the Board's website at http://www.dca.ca.gov/pels under the link to the Laws and Regulations. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, you may contact me by telephone at (916) 263-2241 or by e-mail at Nancy Eissler@dca.ca.gov. Sincerely, Nancy A. Eissler Enforcement Analyst California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors http://www.dca.ca.gov/pels ou Accredited by theAmerican National Standards InstituteICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. 5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601-2299 A subsidiary corporation of the International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Copyright © 2001 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. ER-4211 Reissued January 1, 2001 Filing Category: FASTENERS—Steel Gusset Plates (066) COMPUTRUS TRUSS PLATES COMPUTRUS, INC. 10370 HEMET STREET, SUITE 200 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 1.0 SUBJECT CompuTrus Truss Plates for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: The CompuTrus Truss Plates are flat steel plates designed to connect wood truss members. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel and come in various lengths and widths, and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit load between truss wood members. Plans and cal- culations must be submitted to the building official for trusses using truss plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The CompuTrus truss plates are punched from No. 18 gage [0.0454 inch (1.15 mm) base metal thickness] and No. 20 gage [0.0375 inch (0.95 mm) base metal thickness] G60-gal- vanized sheet steel complying with the mechanical require- ments established in ASTM A 653 SQ Grade 33 or higher. Each plate has 9.4 teeth persquare inch of plate; each tooth is approximately 1/s inch (8.5 mm) long and approximately 0.106 inch (2.7 mm) wide. The teeth are punched in pairs, with each pair spaced 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) on center along the width of the plate, and 0.85 inch (21.6 mm) on center along the length. Alternating rows of teeth are staggered 0.10 inch (2.5 mm) from adjacent rows. The "CM" series plates are identical to the "C" series plates, except that every third row of teeth is omitted. Plates are 0.85 inch (21.6 mm) in length, and are available in widths of up to 12 inches (305 mm), in 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) increments, as required by design. The plates are applied to truss members in pairs, with one plate on each face of each joint, using a power press constructed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. See Figure 4 for de- tails of plate dimensions. 2.3 Allowable Loads: Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide allowable lateral loads, tension loads and shear loads, respectively, for the CompuTrus truss plates. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construc- tion, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI1-1995 stand- ard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed to transfer the required load without ex- ceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, based on species, on the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and on the direction of load relative to grain. De- sign for lateral resistance must be in accordance with Section 11.2.1 of ANSI/TP11-1995. Table 1 provides allowable lateral loads for the truss plates. 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the truss plate relative to the direction of load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TP11-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads for the truss plates. Additionally, the net section of the truss plates fortension joints must be designed using the allowable tensile stress of the metal, adjusted by the truss plate tensile effectiveness ratios shown in Table 2. 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 3 shows allowable shear loads for the truss plates. Additionally, the net section of the truss plates for heel joints and other joints involving shear must be designed using the allowable shear values for the truss plates, adjusted by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in Table 3. 2.3.4 Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable-load re- duction factors for the metal plates, when they are applicable, must be considered cumulatively in the design of truss plates used in fabricated wood trusses: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the CompuTrus truss plates must be reduced by a strength reduction fac- tor, OR, shown in Table 4, when the plates are installed in lumber by means of a single-pass, full-embedment roller system having minimum rollerdiameters equal to 18 inch- es (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embed- ment hydraulic-platen presses, multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full-embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller presses and hydraulic-platen presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press. When trusses are fab- ricated with single-pass roller presses, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the minimum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the CompuTrus truss plates must be reduced by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members, 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the CompuTrus truss plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 per- cent at the time of truss fabrication. Evaluation reports of ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., are issued solely to provide information to Class A members of ICBO, utilizing the code upon which the report is based. Evaluation reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed nor as an endorsement or recommen- dation for use of the subject report. This report is based upon independent tests or other technical data submitted by the applicant. The ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., technical staff has reviewed the test results and/or other data, but does not possess test facilities to make an independent verification. There is no warranty by ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., express or implied, as to any "Finding" or other matter in the reporter as to any product covered by the report This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability. Page 1 of 5 Page 2 of 5 ER-4211 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for CompuTrus truss plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated wood truss must be reduced by the heel-joint reduction factor, HR, as follows: HK = 0.85 - 0.05(12tan8 - 2.0) where: 0.65 ZHR<> 0.85 6 = Angle between lines of action of the top and bottom chords (shown in Figure 3). Where the top chord slopes are greater than 12:12 (100% slope), this heel-joint reduction factor is not applied. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed for combined shear and tension capacity, based on the orientation of the truss plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for combined shear and ten- sion must be in accordance with Section 11.2.4 of ANSI/TPl 1-1995. 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Truss plates designed for axial forces are only permitted as splices in the top and bottom chord when the splices are within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment. Design of truss plates at splices in the top and bottom chord that are not placed within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment must include combined flexure and axial stresses. 2.4 Truss Design: Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using truss plates described in this report. The truss design must show compliance with the code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads for the truss plates may be increased for duration of load in accordance with the code. Calculations must specify the deflection ratio or the maximum deflection for live and total load. For each truss design drawing, the following information, at a mini- mum, should be specified by the design engineer: 1. Truss span, spacing, and slope or depth. 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of truss plates at each joint. 4. Truss chord and web lumber size, species, and grade. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loads, concentrated loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- quake loads. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TPl 1-1995 and any adjustments to lumber and truss plate allowable val- ues for conditions of use. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- cator that has an approved quality assurance program cover- ing the wood truss manufacturing and inspection process in accordance with Sections 2304.4.4 and 2321.3 of the code and Section 4 of ANSI/TPl 1-1995. The allowable loads rec- ogn ized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneumatic embedment presses; multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full-embedment rollers; or combinations of partial embedment roller presses and hydraulic-platen presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press or, if the ad- justment factors given in Table 4 are used, single-pass roller presses. When truss fabricators use single-pass roller presses, the rollers must have minlmum-18-inch (457 mm) diameters. Plates embedded with a single-pass, full-embedment roller press must be preset, before passing through the roller press, by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a hammer. 2.6 Identification: The CompuTrus "C" Series plates are embossed with the designation "C-20" or "C-18," for the No. 20 gage or No. 18 gage plates, respectively. For the "CN" series, the No. 20 gage plate is identified by the designation "CN-20" embossed on the plate, and the No. 18 gage plate is identified by the des- ignation °CN-18." 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Test data in accordance with National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 4.0 FINDINGS That the CompuTrus Truss Plates for Wood Trusses de- scribed in this report comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code™, subject to the following conditions: 4.1 Plans and calculations are submitted to the build- ing official for the trusses using truss plates de- scribed in this report 4.2 The truss plates are designed to transfer the re- quired loads using the design formulae in ANSI/TPl 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPl 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the building official. 4.3 The allowable loads for the truss plates comply with this evaluation report. 4.4 Truss plates are not permitted to be placed where knots occur in connected wood truss members. 4.5 Truss plates are installed In pairs on opposite faces of truss members. 4.6 Trusses using truss plates described in this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator approved by the building official, In accordance with Sec- tions 2304.4.4 and 2321.3 of the code. 4.7 Allowable loads shown in the tables of this report may be increased for duration of load in accord- ance with the code. 4.8 Overpressed truss plates are not permitted. Over- pressed plates occur when the truss plate is em- bedded into the lumber more than one-half the plate metal thickness. 4.9 Allowable loads shown in the tables of this report are not applicable to truss plates embedded in lum- ber treated with fire-resistive chemicals. 4.10 When a one-hourfire-resistive rating is required for trusses using CompuTrus plates, see Evaluation Report ER-1632. This report is subject to re-examination in two years. CampuTrus, Inc. Manufacturing • Engineering • Computer Systems WARNINGS: 1. Read all General Notes and Warnings before construction of trusses. 2. Builder and erection contractor should be advised of all General Notes and Warnings before construction commences. 3. 1 x3 compression web bracing must be installed where shown +. 4. All lateral force resisting elements such as temporary and permanent bracing, must be designed and provided by designer of complete structure. CompuTrus assumes no responsibil- ity for such bracing. 5. No load should be applied to any component until after all bracing and fasteners are complete, and at no time should any toads greater than design loads be applied to any component 6. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responsibility for the fabrication, handling, shipment and installation of components. 7. This design is furnished subject to the limitations on truss designs set forth by the Truss Plate Institute in "Bracing Wood Trusses, HIB-91", a copy of which will be furnished by CompuTrus upon request. GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted: Design to support loads as shown. Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be laterally braced at 2'-0" o.c. and at 12'-0" o.c. respectively. 3. 2x4 Impact bridging or lateral bracing required where shown + +. 4. Installation of truss is the responsibility of the respective contractor. 5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for "dry condition" of use. 6. Design assumes full bearing at all supports shown. Shim or wedge if necessary. 7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided. 8. Plates shall be located on both faces of truss, and placed so their center lines coincide with joint center lines. 9. Digits indicate size of plate in inches. 10. For basic design values of the CompuTrus Plate, indicated by the prefix "C", see I.C.B.O. R.R. 4211 11 The CompuTrus Net Section Plate is indicated by the prefix "CN", the designator (18) indicated 18 ga. material is used. All others are 20 ga. General Notes: Bracing to top and bottom chords not required, provided the chord members are braced throughout their length by continuous sheathing. This safety alert symbol is used to attract your attention! PERSONAL SAFETY IS INVOLVED! When you see this symbol - BECOME ALERT - HEED ITS MESSAGE. " '•'".' '•''. '. '•• '••• •'•*•:•"'-. "••• r-'-1' DANGER: A DANGER designates a condition where failure to follow instructions or heed warn- ing will most likely result in serious personal injury or death or damage to structures. CAUTION: A CAUTION identifies safe operating practices or Indicates unsafe conditions that could result in personal Injury or damage to structures. WARNING: A WARNING describes a condition where failure to follow instructions could result in severe personal injury or damage to structures. HIB-91 Summary Sheet COMMENTARY and RECOMMENDATIONS for HANDLING, INSTALLING & BRACING METAL V PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSJES ® :V»fetheresponsJbHityofihBtnsfaller/fbMer.bulldlnqcontractor.licensed'contractor: .=. "erector or erection contractoh to properly receiv& unload, store, handle, install and bfacame tal plate connected wood trusses to protect life and property. The installer must exercise the same high degree of safety awareness as with any other structural material TPI does not intend these recommendations to be interpreted as superior •' to the project Architects or Engineer's design specification for handling. Installing , and bracing wood trusses fora particular roof or. floor These recommendations are based upon the collective experience of leading technical personnel in the Wood TRUSS PLATE INSTITUTE 583 d'Onofrlp Dr., Suite 20Q Madison, Wisconsin 153719 . ., . . .truss industry, ! but must, due to the nature of responsibilities involved, be presented as a guide for the use of a qualified building designer or installer. Thus, - the Truss Plate Institute, Inc. expressly disclaims any responsibility for damages' arising' from the -use, application or reliance on the recxirnmendations and ' inforraatfonwntainedhereinbybuWhgdesignere.in^ . O by Truss Plate Institute. Inc. All rights reserved. This docurnent or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form wi.thoiit writtert permission of the ': publisher Printed in the United S^'of A^ric^;^ii?§i|;^K§fi-?^^^?fi] CAUTION: Thebuilder, building contractor, licensed contractor, erectororerectiort contractor Isad vised to obtain and read the entire booklet "Commentary and Recommendations for Handling, Installing & Bracing Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses, HlB- 91" from the Truss Plate Institute. •"ji A CAUTION: All temporary bracingshould be no less than 2x4 grade marked lumber. All connections should be made with minimum of 2-16d hails. All trusses assumed 2* on-center or less. AH multi-ply trusses should be connected together in accor- dance with design drawings prior to Installation. TRUSS STORAGE CAUTION: Trusses should not be unloaded on rough terrain or un- even surfaces which could cause damage to the truss. A CAUTION: Trusses stored horizontally should be supported on blocking to prevent excessive lateral bending and lessen moisture gain. , A WARNING: Do not break banding until installation begins. Care should be exercised in banding re- moval to avoid shifting of Individual trusses. A WARNING: Do not lift bundled trusses by the bands. Do not use damaged trusses. VV CAUTION: Trusses stored vertically should be £^ braced to prevent toppling or tipping. A DANGER: Do not store bundles upright unless properly braced. Do not break bands until bundles are placed in a stable horizontal position; A DANGER: Walking on trusses which are lying flat is extremely dangerous and should be strictly prohibited. WARNING: Do not lift single trusses with spans greater than 30' by the peak. /<;Approxiinaieiyv, ,;.:-• i:.%?Approxirnateiyv'vi•9f3&%*&$.wm.K^gSgS^Sf^J^i Z$&. .^ci«:WTrilSS slbans iw'thSri'sO^-lfejJ&Ilf 11 IHInn dauleaa ahaiilH ha eannadad toLifting devices should be connected to the truss, top chord with a closed-loop attachment utilizing materials such as •lings, chains, cables, nylon strapping, etc. of sufficient strength to carry the weight of the truss. Each truss should be set In proper position per the building designer's framing plan and held with the lifting device until the ends of the truss are securely fastened and tempo- rary bracing la Installed. adequate for the Installation of esslonal engineer If a different acing In accordance with TPI's Metal Plate Connected Wood clng Is possible. ND BRACING: BUILDING EXTERIOR Typical horizontal He number with «uWpl»«tak««(HT) for all Installations. E«MM%0 1 See a registered professional engineer .. 5!£-S«'j-;£'S£!aAW£irEa*&y- Continuous Top Chord Lateral Braes Required Attachment Required Top chorda that an laterally bracad can buckl* to9*ttMr«ndca<iMcollapMlith«»!«Mdlaao. nal bracing. Diagonal brading should txiuifod to tha undarald* olth* top chord whan purHna an attached to ttw topaJda ol the top chord. See a registered professional-engineer Continuous Top Chord Lateral Brace Required Attachment Required Top chord* that an laterally braced can buckle togatharand eaiwcollapw ifttiaralano diago- nal bracing. Diagonal braclnoshouldtw nailed to tha undaralda of tha top chord whan puriina attaehad to tha topalda ol Uw top chord. sea a registered professional engineer K^ Continuous - — -^ Top Chord ^"\ Required 10* or Greater Attachment / Required — fpfiTro Jx;>-< -N- lulbraehg. OhgoiwIbndngihouU b.n»L«J to«h«und»r»W«o«th«topohixdwh«npurlln« am attielMd to th« topsld* of KM top chord. See a registered professional engineer !^PFr-Dpuglas;.FJr^dr^ Contlnuou* Top Chord Lateral Brace Required- Topohonto ttutm Urtwally bnewl em buokta U>g<Uwr»idcWMOon>pMllth«r«UiK>dl*go. to ito und«r»ld« of UM top chord whm puriliw •m *HMb*d to Uw topcld* of ttw tap chord. CwtfftMftA'C f.t'&^£&££&^^^^^ SH/DISW ESHBBlBte See a registered professional engineer Continuous Top Chord Lateral Brace Required Top chontettutan latently braced can buekl*tog*th«rand eaiw«conapM if than lanodlago- nalbracinj. Diagonal bracing ahouldlMiuiM tolha undaraW. of tbatop chord whan purtloa an attaehad to tha topatda of Iha top chord. Attachment Required TION TOLERANCES. umstances should description beplaced /"<•'. -j 'I,. 4. .:': ; '}•• t.':. i* :-••- .'• .--. ^-•' -.;•*.--..•.•: . •••^--i-UI^^-'•. CV*%»***k aC-£ J '-**-. j\ :.-*-. v-1--a,?...--.'-'/"* ".'•j->1"' *y-». -f;-'i'.'-"i."--~-. • ^g^^r 1X1 1X3 - u is i i 3 ION DETAI£ Z Oo 6zau. toe 15 - • <0 uw wUla «IO 3 UJa UBC-97tooin 5) CO a UJ(0 *11 £ -E .t "£ Arr l><1 4- J *2^8 ^ ow inmo S •-J ?= «to o CM i >r> T—CO oLUCO Jf X8 s So i! 1!factu§ 3 ei (0(0 I o W Ws 30'01/0125-1FILEDATE:REF: ^^^^ Ks gU,o wUJ M4 $ B- co/ie/c-dxa °\•pannbai•9JBO qjiM jno 9q isnui sstpjou £Xfr 30op0B '-D-O ((9i JB spn)s ITO W snonuyjuoD :AI noi»dQ •paimbsj sj93(oonno uaaMjaq Sur^oojq 3x^7 JOj • •§ouB9q ipy log pug qosa JB s •uouniioo jqj SB Supjno aureg •areo T^IM jno sq jsnxu oiui jno jou OQ oju; ina jou OQ p3}si[ SIB suoi;do JBJ3A3S 'JsiBj sjiBtfej }U9A3jd oj ssgoojd uSyssp 9qj Suunp 9pBm 9q jsnra snoiiBiaptsuoo puB SSTUI gqj ui urauodraoo IBOIJUO B si pioqo doj 9qx -sjopgdstn ppg jisqj pue siugtnpBdgp Sutp^mq gip Aq Xm;tuos pasBaioui ispun suioo SABq sasstu^jo S9dAj asaqj, •si95joopno JQJ p9qo;ou sq spioqo doj Jiaqi 9imb9j S9unj9raos spBO[ oiuisps JO/ptre jBotjjgA poddns oj pguSisgp ugsq 3ABq jBqi sgsstuj pus •onj IstmndnioQ / ^&»^ss^,^"* 1 V i * e » e1 I iff! MI€ « . « t* i s » i*»$f*| Sjf ! in*|?8 **i*i 3,1III? l!hl II £ ii i-. I ii£g s asWt 'l;-,ijfijl'ii, .! fiitilH |!H:ililSlliH&Millii"1112llj; II I! it s •si s Ii s s s a a b VWr1 . U. CD i FSl- s o (0 oV) toUJ Q ^1* O z uiuj 1= a:=i < UIu. o a: Im •a-^in W 2 owUJaoa1 3£ O of I Ul O O W§o £ ffl UJ m ii'/iA^ $£^ 5c ?2" £ a d I CM CM CO U> b) o> (O CMb> CM co (D £UJ Q o u_ Q. I Q. +1 f*Is i '• **CO Ouj CDQ 3 XQ O N V) Q 2 mH F ii Od < uj ujU. Q CC CO ;&SsM'ft«vSES^i;»«5i«Ki^£,^^ ;K:i&2£££"£^« I: %s -Ii s«ii s gIllcf |iU lit!ill lilis^«h^i !i^l°.8P; c I 31 I 5 5 « o o £ £ 00 Ul a. S 1 1 * - -» 8!S 5 "- = 1 1 I f Niv \ I *° «5 a s ???_£ 5 s o .,13 3 -* U •* tfl ^»x « « a M s" 5 s U O M fill1 lli! 1«- iiifiiiUHtt"iiiSiBlilifii.• •• ri •« 2 I- C.S «l >-> a V)s 3 ro § 5 = S UJ O SN UJ 01II 81 §5o c. u cri •aexEn Y\\ 10 £ 1 fs • 1 § ciS *O> •| a i < //» w/ 0 // Sil //_u o fe 4 /.o T , • /? *"£ 3 //WILQ * na: o a X \ \UJ cvj H ° \\ 2*1? \^ 3c1^ \\ >/i& o K1 Ki b b li o(0 ccO -8 § liii-=! < UJU. Q (£. KS —-• tn m: o> »—z" >^ 5 3 ui •! _i _i »— (j ^t -v.gtn en J ID to ID IDc\j r\j c\j oj S OB /M BS. 00-60-S . 00-EO-^ , 00-00-^ 3B /H 95 J00:00-8 DO-OO-E cu CE (D O15xx s(VIi^ o in a ID 10 o> in cu m o> in ini n -v m m « vI ' I -rt -M: i iii « i * i • ••* w n ^ in ID r^u en o to o ni o o ?*- in ipSO ^T v^ IHo nj o nZ I M I H I*-• « c\i to ^» intoa in in ^ 01 •* vJ- tr> m in *r o r^^ tu 10 m in K DM m w i i tu min i > ii • « • M i n•" cu n ^ m to ft itto tn"i to in19MID • oj Ln -^S3I O 19 a z <2 O o t-1-1 I- t- Oa i-1- 1 -j ID in 01 • • z ^ ^ ^ o pa. mm u ui inb- O I*•< < tt i M .. :o cr o nj u •" tn i __ui ox* *mui 0.0.: o ni ii J5*sin uj 5>-< a C* fe^fe b S3UJ UJ (n ni nj ni <nEoru3,._i _i"!"!«,«O O •" xtu 01 in rua si o o* •ni in i •0 ^«T_I_I??BB" ' dp!G!G! . •LU UJ N Nt"gg_i t- x x x x x x< < < < k*. '(tea*-;•>-'* Sf-£D-0» § n ui LQ- ^» * ISPi iiiliiriiiliiii TOOin ni n ii• HIr* ID 01XXX o •»X X in tn_S5SZ IO IDi o ni oi ni ni «*•* nR •g;U. •S ni10 X Xsi *A.DXXXi ni n '1 03 ID I 9h-*x "9 * 'i-t ia inu> ID m <^S5,£ in in o o r> r- ni ni iUJ .u. o I Kg D. a^-< DX O IIVI -J o in n o n a " r» rC ' in ino m_i -J o i^ in o o o z o o o in n nH^ ID in ID ni • •so ~ ni _ ^ i • i i N *" SooS —— ID o CD in 5 a u. u. u. u.iiii --« r»a ui ni to -" co in V^dfi UJ UJ N N ° ° £ 5 •D--« 01ot •« -oe. a . t,—« c tn o§TJ J=X C. UBOOc. CD £ eu ovt -o -MI•i to a *• jm *• o o i i ru £ £ • . . . o.555U O4-1 U U U^ o o o CXI *H • * •i 01 cu cu i* i| UIO CU IO «4 . . • I, . . 7 88 °! V V t- • ..§ ££. CO I- ~ ~* CD cn<r«CUCJtXICOI^ OO Z( • IT a.CD O JUIU -.< •» 33 ij"- jililil E f- ri o V vo ESSSinini£ X Z X *cu ni m cuZ I • 1 '»-i •< W P) ^(A m n CD ffi 2nioiMgh"-.a) niID lDll.ll.S 5°°to to(0 ID Q)85 ••« n!i i* > I I-. no m _j _ini T u. u.. . m uI I D Qaoino^-eov^cn^ to in ni-inintni ineior^oTin vi toininini ~ CM cn ^ in to i I U o•81.' o tn 2 S3SEE< cn 5 z ao tun. M LIu> i- < in cr cn • a o 1-4 U US _Ja z <o a o h-_j f- t- o»— t-Z OO CO -I — Qo i! I r!' JI] \il h i\hiltiii '!"•H Pi' HillSHI !ih !i Slltll, « ri mm tilliSiimls.°"£< USINN. HI Ij si|ji'|j: fiiiliiilJli Ti „•-» • M XX Xin nj cu. ni VjliplffiflJsi 1 111 _i h- in aw < UJ UJu- a a in nlinaiSocninnSi a • K i > •«•• ni en T in u> Is*^ en tfi i-*m 10 o totr. in «•« nj toUJ cvt ru m niUJ m ID m ffiz 01 o en oi to o1-1 o to Is- r- n mtn r* ^ r-» r* in 03 fcfcen in. •" w in ^T to to onoin• w ar- to< *I UJ o S o ^Z (U a M u ils ss 889^5CD o a a z <2 x i: _i o *-.MOO MX§_!»-<a i < uo o i- P -_1 I- I- O Q Qi— h- uj (r§g =2ftu °.§ ag o ID in5 LJc B: uj i a illu 5 •-» a.cj o s UJox en S ^S II p"°ai n v v Iin. as§ it— »—33 E^ ^0i^ff-0 !-•«> 01° £ { 'j • l»n li}i JiWll U1 i& 5 i« *Tit**>i»i*<l S|ii]|£il2iEi£e|i IIHM I{!Sl!rh*iliII4l*»iilliilliillli! i- in a•* 111 UJa a in ISRR•V X X X X«i CM m •» intu X x x X x8 01 0)N «\i01 n CD •» o10 N r*> •* atin « 10 CM ID«i ni TI IM cu c\j mBoOJ« ni_1 _J 0) IDn oao o o o-5'g1t-i <5g.,•' ' il og 8 rs'! i 2 cufr-l : z a SO U. U. U- . ^~ 000 Z• • O 1 " ' 3S SiS"-!O O O Z < U U IH X iS?s".i- i- o a a „o z• o a. tn fr*i OLJo o Mi f/ia o u KU) uiNMin o cc. o tn> z v : x[ ro Sl-£0-0 £ <U tt ID •^cn u '4. A * S % &i• 4.5E • •> a. "o IiB!!|SHUM i lilUi^fllib£ | • IS 3 5if«">_ S S.- £ -o-S ohH III Wu- an*-• < ccU <T O •,u2 gg is m (/i o. a. t-*u aa oo in ujt- i—33 SI-M-l i I « • »; 10 r*. to en u otn ~ i ! ,i ii ij ill | U'i '!• !i \W* I'lll"i ii i P'lim! lilii \~rl ri W .S oi 01m o a. u_gig;i ni 01 en CD ni m: to 10 •* •* 10 tor% N r^ N N h* oni ni ni ni ni ni 01Z I I » M I •1-1 « ni in ^ in toV)(D ID ffl GQ ID tDJ O (D CD O CO tn i i i I H I*-« eu tn a,i<u 2 s CD« ^1 •V ^W (0 fflU C»n -i i = S^ri ttWw OB I'i 1 i' J I1IIJ irsilUHtfl!! Hliilliti] I ^ fi IB ti 12 S O) O <V Otn r\t •"-« CD01 *-t r*. ^-ico ~* 44-1 !*** j.oE • o 5. ~o hi f f !R till I illI ill« I 1 »IBM ili af^i.ii! Ifc .. .E|B! .1 *|rif .lilSpp F*is ss'1^ ,'|s|s 1*1=1 •="S"?1!*?" S> •oil.--cm|aSd5;*cf •eH'SnK; Jf&sflfS Hp£l|Hi^lllls iiti^iiHiHSiH tffteb I ill itIrihnrni UJ T ^ :e°lIe!£Bc:8-SJ«2 jr?li?|fi?MfSikoONnSa zo £nE=ou-. KT I^M* riWui o ^» «° ^' itfiii* if?«*s !il;« il ii! JP ii Hi *f 'f' I ! HPiiiiiiiliilmi UJ UJ *_» *- enM < LUu. a o 1C IO m m o at in in toID in in to 10 10in tu <v in oi 1 "ft.ltin in** *iin inta fai i%•»UJ COCOz o rft .in t-CDS01 •*>. w* 0| P» ^ I - Ul O"5. coo z. o iSSz^: i _j o •-• sz 5° *** O o IO ost 3 .. g•-» uj tn QCu. a a o oH« < cc r .. Du croniunjinH-S! °5*i*Stn I/) U O 3? O O tcc tu t- ouj a. u. co u. M,ID en D o a UJ T]-NM Xen nj z z§§ QC CCO Oa. a UJ Ul h- ^-53 ^ inni <tua »< < .,rf !S? ID ID ID CDm m •" £ ~Sn oi pi PIr< rSS 8 ID ID' m m• - ni in * i* x x r f «i5t-iCCHUJm •|,ni i • ini iu m *r _i -/ in cira inoo CD o ome*-•iien CMnj ni(0 10 oS™™CD ** CO XX< •<s 5 UJ UJ UJ UJ 111> > > > > o o o o o ia ic ID to o *• I O * tu ia <D oa OD^4 v< «rf vt o o o o oh- I- h- H- h- o o o o o ' to o ni to o o u. u. ^ pi (9 o & 3X J .... a. o. o. o- a. H I I N I S OD 0 O Is*ru (u -H m o o ca a a o So^ c> o o ' (0 CM to^i a o en inS3 o o nj ru m tn m ai 88 U U . U_ U- U. U. : z z z z' => =>=> 3 t-f UJ Iu. a i USin ..tt o n; u ni ui i-o x * » ID eno x min p *•HO. Hse s ft o°n- D M X Xen ni m ouD O s. Q. 32 g£E S menX ^ 01 01t-tin • Men «« «n r lu T ^ru K ru o croocc to n to M n • •UJ IE 3 « ^X li I£1 ocX I N I V.^•rt nj in o <nj tu LL. ttu CD ID o ^ cc a a^ "h-h.SSS 1"!"!in ID u i-ti i aC i ni u. ni u ^- z «M z z a< a uio. M o _i a. i m 01 mcu «_) -J T oo -«in in o oa BIs s IIO O li. U.. . ui Uli i o a« « -1 _l * *U_ U_ li.in to ina. a. a.i i ini/iz ujuj a ID _l m i U Up p ni ni CJ X Iui o :wo. t-O O HU I- Oa u. m ULin o a •vo •CM 33 % s <"UJog o — . — .!¥ 88' '•2 •** **oV (t O<5 (O *Z •^5• UJffi *< DJ ED O2 r- fs <5 (O *DhH CU W Z • •« IO ID ^1 'en no o•v CD au acu •*^S2T T O O^ o— * m _JO O U- I• UlI I OJ Ul N NO n wx x X :< < < •z x x :SIr O I (Jo I UJ O I- e£ • toitv o v z : 1-1 o Z Z O O I< a ui _j ia. i-t utn t— < :< a ien oc tn ui a1 ' " SSess--, 10 ouo o < en • no Q v v1-1 uj tn ocu. o a o a i- (-•-• <2 ic ..S ffiru jxonjotvcni- ooUJ (DZ« * ID U) Q. Q.&** y ui n fLui ox r> 3M& I- WC/l OC U I- O -J -J£ fe fe^fe fe 55£ uj Ui5 *- i- tu "«r <r ^ _i _iN tn nj OJ nj {f Q 9I-EO-0 ci: 15 S^oi p»-*io «' {! s!j I }i}ili W !l ri V inm o iin S UJCO D. < (D O fcfct/i too o2 ** ^Ii** in <LJ CD ^ SS- Ein i- -J, <m -i in o o ai tn o o u. u._i _ia a. o 01 m oinj in in ru 55 uUJft o: I .. %i in crtoo o: tr i .. D: o nj {_> c\i [/i i-II* <fc CO (/)CJ I UJI O X 10 X01 *J3a E OU eoL. L.10avt_a ca HI v in c .. <01 Z g i H fill] !f illl'lliKlftijl ill HP a\ COcr\a\inin aH : *•> - inni cuU-Itrui mlo DuJ m mcc to to£0 «ff T.t-tDC<to «rt cn inni • i u z oO UJ. M LJ • Q<O 9K * in in in0. CL Q. a o a i- CD O O O Z <Z I I -J D MMOO MX < a z < o *O O O I- 3 ._i i- h- o a at- K UJ ITZ O (X Oo m x ll- O I o o o S tM o ni iri t- th * CO 0)O Z UJI O f O IUJ ISi .Q. tn u.u: 0) Z CD CD '.c n ?.tt *^B lift-"6li"Cc^-i '^-iu^MIf!s||!l!p|-N, ,'fSjtJ 8JS"Btf»~•a5«-e-oE E5«Slm§°°i*«?Li .ill?|of= •»3S?SSS?S£OOCMN£O «c I CO COa\CTlinin PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380 BILL SLATTERY & ASSOCIATES 2585 Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention: September 11,2002 Work Order 400829A Mr. Bill Slattery Subject:Clarification with Respect to Street Address Location, 1155,1161 and 1165 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California References: 1) Geotechnical Foundation Investigation, Chestnut Property, City of Carlsbad, CA., by Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., dated November 8, 2001 (Work Order 400829). 2) Grading Report for the Chestnut Property, Parcel A APN-205-210-40-00 and Parcel B APN 205-210-27-00, in the City of Carlsbad, CA, dated August 8, 2002 (Work Order 400829). Gentlemen: Presented herein is verification that the above-referenced geotechnical reports dated No- vember 8, 2001 and August 8, 2002, encompass and are specific to the grading and founda- tion design for three (3) building pads located atl!55, 1161 and 1165 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlsbad. CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS TEL: (714) 220-0770 FAX: (714) 220-9589 LOS ANGELES COUNTY TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 FAX: (714) 220-9589 RIVERSIDE COI TEL: (909) 676-8195 FAX: (909) 676-1879 kSOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (714) 730-5191 Work Order 400829A September 11,2002 Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, PACIFIC /~ .,GE2314 anager of Geotechhical Servic . HANSON, CEG 990 Vice President Dist: (2) Addressee JAC/JAH/bm:400829A, September 11, 2002 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION v CHESTNUT PROPERTY CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA For: HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DECEMBER 18, 2001 By: PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. San Diego, CA (Work Order 400829) Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY 3 Table A - UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters 4 4.1 Ground water 4 Figures 1-3 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 5 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals 5 5.2 Existing Site Improvements 5 5.3 Grading Compliance 5 5.4 Site Preparation 6 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment 6 5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation 6 5.7 Compacted Fill Placement 6 5.8 Soil Material Suitability 7 5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics 7 5.10 Import Soils 7 5.11 Compaction Testing 7 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA 7 6.1 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria 8 6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation System 8 Table B - Conventional Foundation Design Parameters 6.3 Retaining Walls 8 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. Page 6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients 9 6.3.2 Other Design Considerations 9 6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems 9 6.3.4 Other Appurtenances 9 7.0 SLOPE STABILITY AND REMEDIATION 10 7.1 Cut Slopes 10 7.2 Fill Slopes 10 7.3 Temporary Backcut Stability 11 8.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 11 APPENDIX A REFERENCES APPENDIX B PLATE A- UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TABLE I - LOGS OF TEST PITS APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYSES TABLE II - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA PLATES B-1 AND B-2 - DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA APPENIX D PLATES C-1 THROUGH C-4 - SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX E EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS PLATES G-1 THROUGH G-11 - GRADING DETAILS POCKET ENCLOSURE: SHEET 2 OF 4 - PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380 HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2541 State Street #202 Carlsbad,CA 92008-1964 December 18, 2001 Work Order 400829 Attention: Mr. Gary Winans Subject: Updated Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the Chestnut Property, in the City of Carlsbad, California References: See Appendix Gentlemen: Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) updated geotechnical foundation evaluation for the Chestnut property, located in the City of Carlsbad, California. This work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated October 25, 2001 on the authorization of Mr. Gary Winans. The purpose of this updated investigation is to generally characterize site geotechnical conditions as they relate to the proposed construction of three (3) wood frame, residential structures supported by slab-on-grade foundation systems, as depicted on the revised one-inch equals 20-feet preliminary grading plans (Sheet 2 of 4) prepared by Reynolds Civil Engineering, Inc. (RCE). 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK The following scope of work has been performed during PSE's investigation. 0 Review of published maps and geologic literature. 0 Mark-out and coordination of Underground Service Alert (USA). CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL: (909) 676-8195 TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (909) 676-1879 FAX: (714) 730-5191 Work Order 400829 Page 2 December 18, 2001 0 Excavation, logging and sampling of eight (8) exploratory test pits, excavated with a John Deere 31OD backhoe with 24 inch bucket (Table I). 0 Laboratory testing and analyses of bulk samples consisting of: 1) hydrometer analysis (Table II); 2) remolded direct shears (Table II and Plates B-1 and B-2); and 3) compaction characteristics (Table II). 0 General discussion of site geology. 0 Limited seismic hazards analysis. 0 Preliminary grading recommendations. 0 Preliminary foundation design recommendations. 0 Preparation of this report and accompanying exhibits summarizing our findings, conclusions and recommendations. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The vacant 0.77-acre parcel is relatively flat with drainage by sheet flow to existing paved streets and associated storm drains. Currently the parcel is vacant with native grasses and some trees. Existing homes are located to the south, west, and east with Chestnut Avenue forming the northern boundary (Sheet 2 of 4). 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is assumed that mass grading techniques will be utilized to create building pads, driveways and surface drainage improvements for support of three (3) residential structures to the grades reflected on enclosed Sheet 2 of 4. It is also understood that the proposed residential wood frame structures will be supported PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 3 December 18, 2001 by a slab-on-grade foundation system with shallow foundation elements. Foundation plans should be reviewed for conformance to PSE's recommendations prior to construction. 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Although no existing site-specific proprietary geotechnical reports were available for PSE's review, published data (Tan and Kennedy, 1996) indicates the site is underlain by terrace deposits of the Quaternary-age Lindavista Formation. Typically, the Lindavista Formation consists of brown to reddish brown, silty to clayey sands. Tan and Kennedy indicates Santiago Formation cropping out one- half (0.5) of a mile southwest of the site at the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and it is likely that Santiago bedrock underlies the site at depth. Review of the regional geologic information indicates the absence of faulting within/or in immediate proximity of the site. The trace of the Rose Canyon fault is located approximately eight (8) kilometers southwest of the parcel. Owing to the dense character of the Lindavista and underlying Santiago Formation, liquefaction potential is very low. Ground shaking from large seismic events generated along offsite faults is possible, as with most areas in the seismically active southern California area. For structural design purposes, the parameters presented in Table A should be utilized for post-graded lots. The site occurs in seismic zone 4, and therefore the seismic zone factor "Z" is 0.4. These parameters are meant to be consistent with UBC (1997). PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 Page 4 TABLE A UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters Soil Profile Type Ca Cv Na Nv Sc 0.40Na 0.56NV 1.0 1.1 4.1 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered at the time of PSE's subsurface investigation at a depth of eight (8) to nine and one-half (9.5) feet below the existing grades. The depth of cut on the eastern edge of the lot, including the lot overexcavation, will be approximately nine (9) feet; therefore, it is considered likely that groundwater will be encountered during grading operations or building construction. It is possible that landscape and/or seasonal precipitation will perch over the relatively dense, Lindavista Formation. In order to mitigate possible adverse effects of the groundwater, it is the recommendation of PSE that a subdrain be placed along the eastern and northern perimeters of the project as shown on the enclosed grading plan. This drain should be constructed at the heel of the proposed keyway for the stabilization fill slope along the eastern edge of the project (see cross sections A-A' through C-C', Figures 1 through 3). If perched conditions develop near finish grade surface, additional measures, such as the combination of area drains and/or French drains, may be required. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. < i UJoc g LL CM II oCM Oo CO CO CM LLJ CC O I o CO LU GC D O LL s 3§S *E| Z•<i/l CM o>CM 00OO CM CM Work Order 400829 Page 5 December 18, 2001 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals As a general guideline, removals will likely be on the order of three (3) feet and should be accomplished over the entire site. Localized areas may require deeper removals and will depend upon conditions encountered during grading operations. Removal and recompaction should be accomplished for the eight (8) backhoe trenches (TP-1 through TP-8) excavated for this study. 5.2 Existing Site Improvements To the best of PSE's knowledge, existing underground improvements do not exist within the proposed building envelopes. Underground utility improvements may exist on the site along Chestnut Avenue. Additionally, residential structures exist on two sides of the subject lot. Given the proximity of the adjacent structures and improvements, care should be taken during grading operations. Accordingly, it should be the contractor's responsibility to protect adjacent improvements in these areas during grading and building construction. 5.3 Grading. Compliance Grading should conform to the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad and the attached PSE earthwork specifications. Field observations will be required during grading by qualified geotechnical personnel. This should include full time observation and testing of fill soil placement by field technician(s) and periodic observation by the soil engineer. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 6 December 18, 2001 5.4 Site Preparation Prior to grading, the site must be stripped and cleared of existing vegetation, trash, debris and other deleterious materials. These materials should be removed and wasted offsite. 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment Once removals are completed, the removal excavations should be moisture conditioned to optimum moisture or slightly above (ASTM:D 1557-91) and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, prior to placement of compacted fill. 5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation Where design grades and/or remedial grading creates a cut/fill transition on a building pad, the cut and shallow fill portions of the pad shall be overexcavated to provide a minimum compacted fill thickness of three (3) feet. Additionally, the undercut shall slope away from the pad a minimum of one (1) percent toward deeper fill areas in order to mitigate perching of subsurface water. 5.7 Compacted Fill Placement Fill should be spread in thin lifts (six to eight inches), the moisture content adjusted to a minimum of optimum moisture or slightly above, and the materials rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM:D 1557-91. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades are achieved. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 7 December 18,2001 5.8 Soil Material Suitability Excavated materials, which are approved by the soil engineer, may be utilized in compacted fill provided that trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. 5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics The onsite materials are considered to be low expansive in nature. Preliminary foundation designs are provided to accommodate this condition. However, as-graded expansive conditions should be confirmed upon completion of grading operations. 5.10 Import Soils Import soils, if needed, should have very low to low expansion properties. The soil engineer should be notified at least 48 hours in advance in order to sample, test and approve or disapprove materials from borrow sites. No import materials should be delivered for use on the site without prior approval by the soil engineer. 5.11 Compaction Testing Fill should be tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the required compaction is achieved. 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA Laboratory testing indicates the existence of onsite materials that are low in expansion potential. Final expansion potential determinations for the subject lots will be dependent on the post-graded soil conditions. For preliminary design purposes, the following conventional slab-on-grade foundation design parameters and recommendations are presented. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 TABLE B CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS Expansion Potential Soil Category Low I Medium II High III Footinq Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Finish Grade One-Story Interior One-Story Exterior Two-Story Interior Two-Story Exterior 12 inches 12 inches 12 inches 18 inches 12 inches 18 inches 18 inches 18 inches 18 inches 24 inches 24 inches 24 inches Footinq Width One-Story Two-Story Footinq Reinforcement One-Story Two-Story Slab Thickness Slab Reinforcement Under-Slab Requirement Slab Subqrade Moisture 12 inches 15 inches No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom. No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom. 4 inches (actual) No. 3 rebars spaced 18 inches on center, each way. 2 inches of clean sand over 10-mil Visqueen, underlain with 2 inches of clean sand. Minimum of 110 per- cent of optimum mois- ture prior to placing concrete. 12 inches 15 inches No. 4 rebars, two (2) on top, two (2) on bottom OR No. 5 rebars, one (1) on top, one on bot- tom. No. 4 rebars, two (2) on top, two (2) on bottom OR No. 5 rebars, one (1) on top, one on bot- tom. 4 inches (actual) No. 3 rebars spaced 15 inches on center, each way. 2 inches of clean sand over 10-mil Visqueen, underlain with 3 inches of clean sand. Minimum of 130 per- cent of optimum mois- ture 24 hours prior to placing concrete to a depth of 12 inches 12 inches 15 inches No. 5 rebars, two (2) on top, two (2) on bottom. No. 5 rebars, two (2) on top, two (2) on bottom. 4 inches (actual) No. 3 rebars spaced 12 inches on center, each way. 2 inches clean sand over 10-mil Visqueen, underlain with 4 inches of clean sand. Minimum of 140 per- cent of optimum mois- ture 48 hours prior to placing concrete to a depth of 12 inches. Footinq Embedment Next to Swales and Slopes If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five (5) feet horizontally of the swale, the footing should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings adjacent to slopes should be embedded such that at least seven (7) feet is provided horizontally from edge of the footing to the face of the slope. Garaqes A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage entrance, ty- ing together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness, reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. O002A Work Order 400829 Page 8 December 18, 2001 Prior to construction, the foundation plans should be reviewed by PSE. At that time, finalized recommendations/comments will be presented. 6.1 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria Foundation systems may be preliminarily designed based upon the following values. Allowable Bearing: 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Lateral Bearing: 200 Ibs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches plus 100 Ibs./sq.ft. for each additional 12 inches embedment to a maximum of 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Sliding Coefficient: 0.35 Settlement: Total = 3/4 inch Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet The above values may be increased as allowed by code to resist transient loading conditions, such as wind or seismic. 6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation Systems Conventional foundation systems may be preliminarily designed in accordance with section 6.1 and Table B. 6.3 Retaining Walls Foundations with retaining walls may be preliminarily designed in accordance with recommendations of paragraph 6.1 and the following: PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 9 December 18, 2001 6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Level Backfill Ka = 0.32 Kp = 3.12 K0 = 0.48 Equivalent fluid pressures can be calculated utilizing a soil unit weight of y= 125 Ibs./ft.3. 6.3.2 Other Design Considerations Retaining wall design should consider additional surcharge loads, where appropriate. 6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems Cantilever and/or restrained retaining walls should be waterproofed to accommodate the anticipated irrigation water and backfilled with free draining material (SE > 30) to within 18 inches of grade and compacted to project specifications to minimize water marks. Native soils shall be utilized in the upper 18 inches. Drainage systems including, as a minimum, a four (4) inch diameter perforated drain line surrounded by three (3) cubic feet per lineal foot of three-quarters (3/4) inch to one (1) inch crushed rock wrapped with a suitable filter fabric, should be provided to all cantilever and restrained retaining walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure. 6.3.4 Other Appurtenances PSE can provide geotechnical design parameters and subsurface drainage recommendations for pools, spas, flatworkor other hardscape improvements upon request. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 10 December 18, 2001 7.0 SLOPE STABILITY AND REMEDIATION 7.1 Cut Slopes Cut slopes have been designed at slope ratios of 2 : 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter to seven (7) feet. Based on the sandy nature of the Lindavista Formation and the shallow groundwater onsite, it is the recommendation of PSE that the westerly facing cut slope be replaced with a drained stabilization fill. This fill should be supported on a variable width keyway of five (5) to seven (7) feet as shown on the enclosed grading plan and cross sections A-A', B-B', and C-C' (Figures 1 through 3). Slope stability calculations for this slope are presented on Plates C-1 and C-2 in Appendix D. Surficial slope stability calculations are presented on Plate C-3. Backcuts and cut slopes should be observed by the engineering geologist during grading. Modifications to the recommendations presented herein may be warranted, based upon conditions exposed by grading. Backcuts should be cut at a slope ratio of no steeper than 1:1. 7.2 Fill Slopes Fill slopes are designed at ratios of 2 : 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The highest design fill slope is approximately three (3) feet. Fill slopes, when properly constructed with onsite materials, are expected to be grossly stable as designed. 2 : 1 fill slopes are considered surficially stable when properly constructed with onsite materials. Keys should be constructed at the toe of all fill slopes toeing on existing or cut grade. Fill keys should have a minimum width equal to fifteen (15) feet. If possible, unsuitable soil removals below the toe of proposed fill slopes should extend outward from the catch point PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 11 December 18, 2001 of the design toe at a minimum 1 : 1 projection on approved cleanout. Backcuts should be cut no steeper than 1 : 1, or as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. 7.3. Temporary Backcut Stability During grading operations, temporary backcuts may be required to accomplish remedial grading. Backcuts should be made no steeper than 1:1. Temporary backcut stability analysis is presented on Plate C-4. In consideration of the inherent instability created by temporary construction backcuts, it is imperative that grading schedules are coordinated to minimize the unsupported exposure time of these excavations. Once started, these excavations and subsequent fill operations should be maintained to completion without intervening delays imposed by avoidable circumstances. In cases where five day work weeks comprise a normal schedule, grading should be planned to avoid exposing at-grade or near-grade excavations through a non-work weekend. Where improvements may be affected by temporary instability, either on or offsite, further restrictions such as slot cutting, extending work days, implementing weekend schedules, and/or other requirements considered critical to serving specific circumstances may be imposed. 8.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Positive drainage away from structures shall be provided and maintained. Utility trench backfill shall be accomplished in accordance with the prevailing criteria of the City of Carlsbad. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 Page 12 December 18, 2001 Seismic design should be based on current and applicable building code requirements. Soluble sulfate concentrations of the foundation material should be determined after grading is complete, when the final distribution of onsite material is known. Preliminary chemical analyses are presently being conducted by Del mar Analytical. Specific recommendations with respect to concrete specifications and cathodic protection should be determined by a corrosion engineer. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 Page 13 The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the specific excavations and observations as noted. The materials immediately adjacent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics and no representations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Respectfully submitted, PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.Reviewed By:.LA-5-i-V JULI^EJHUGHES, Civil Engineering Associate M. PgTTROSS, CEG 2043 gineering Geologist Dist: (6) Addressee JEH/JAC/JMP/JAH:sl/0002 Reviewed by HANSON, CEG 9| Vice president PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. APPENDIX Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 REFERENCES Gregory, Garry H., 1999, GSTABL7 with STEDwin, slope stability analysis system. ICBO, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California: International Conference of Building Officials, 3 volumes. Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., 2001, Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the Chestnut Property, in the City of Carlsbad, California, dated November 8, 2001 (Work Order 400829). Tan, S. S., and Kennedy, M. P., 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestern part of San Diego County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, open file report 96-02. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. APPENDIX B UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS *» I PI t fe * I J I l - •£ Q w N •> 1 *£ o fe M 05 "ftJC i;l g 1 * i i $ f - '° 8*£«, c>~ 5 •" * t * f S JsE S¥*p? •> <-> ~ &J|iili -flpi- 5 * f 0 J ° f^ f " -<* ic _ «> f*t!*- ^|E :': ^|;-|i «fj|ii I** M1^ *s>^* o 1 1* £ ^> x / / v S5 * ii "f V ^ I J6 /*7 /s- HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS = OUP M6OLS 0 .0 GW 1 GP p' oGM S*'XGC^s sw :SP •SM * j Q^ ML / ftiUL MH ^C"/>,/ On ~= PI TYPICAL NAMES Well-groOeO g/rrveli, g/ovel tond mitu'ei, littlr o- no fines little O' no tnei Silty grovtli, giovcl-sond-silt mulufes Clayey grovels, gravel-sond-iih miitures Wel-groded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fnes Poorly • graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines Silly sands, sand-silt matures Clayey sands, sond-cloy rritturts Inorganic silts and fine sands, rock flour silly or ctoyey fine sonds or clayey tilts with slight plasticity fxrgcnc days of bw to medium plasticity,grove My clays, sandy clays, tiny cloys, lean cloys Organic tits ond organic silly cloys of bw plasticity Inorganic tilts, micaceous or diatomoceous fine tandy or tilty tails, elastic tills Inorganic cloys ot high plasticity, tot cloyt Oigonic cloys of medium to high plasticity, organic tills Peat and other highly organic soils ri£LO IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES Wide range g/o>n sires ond substantial amounts ot oil intermediate portcle tites *r*6ominotely one interr we o o range of tires with some rediote siies missing Nonpiostk fines or tines with km plasticity (fa identi- procedures tee ML below) toslic fines (fo> identification procedures vte CL below) Wide range r grain tiles and tubstontiol amounts of all ruerrnediare panicle tins Predominolery one sue or o rongt of tome inttrmedatt tilts missing tiles with Nonptoslic finet or fmes with low ptasticity (tor identification procedures tee ML Mow) Plastic fines (for identification procedures tee CL below) IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES on fraction trailer than No. 4O sieve sue Dry Strength ( crushing cnarocterittict) None to slight Medium to high Slight tomedium Slight la medium High to very high Medium to htgh Dilotoncy (reaction to shokmg) Quick to tb. «~A~0 Sow Stow k> none None N**t£.~> Toughness (consistency near PL) None Medium Slight to medium Slight to medium High Slight to medium Readily Identified ey color, odor, tpongy, feel ond frequently by fibrous teilure BCXMDARf CLASSIflCAtlONS So* pxxung cnorKlvnun ol two »ttjpi <n OcwgnoiM b> torrtoaico of orw trirfeoh 1 PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS | SILT OR CLAY SAND GRAVEL FINE MCOUM COARSE FINE COARSE No TOO No 4O NcC ND« 1» rus sitNDiso s*vc SIZE CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION ! - COBBLES 1ii 3» (Cm) BOULDERS CRAM. Aft SO.L COHES.VE SO,L BEDROCK MO.STURE CONP.T,QN QTHER SYMBOLS Vkjry loose Vbry »°'» Dry R- Undisturbed somple LooM Soft Slightly moist B- Bulk sample Moderotely oense Firm ^ Mois1 * Gmundwoter Medium dense Stiff Moderately hord Wet Si Groundwoter seepage Dense Very stiff Hord Saturated Very d«n»e Hord Very hord IMx* no Ttv Uraiao Sal Oaewkcoiicn Syitvn, Com d iKgnwv US. *"«» '*c»»c«l KimcnTAier, No S'»7, M^titaK •«*.***<. MO PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PLATE A Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 Work Order 400829 Date Excavated. Excavated by 10/29/01 SDH Equipment John Deere 310 D Backhoe with 24 inch Bucket TABLE I LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No.Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-1 0.0-1.5 1.5-8.5 SM SM TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, fine-grained, light red brown, dry, loose; some roots. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SILTY SAND, fine- grained, gray-light yellow, moist, dense; slight pinhole porosity; few roots to 5.0 ft.; uncommon iron oxide stained fractures. TOTAL DEPTH 8.5 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING TP-2 0.0-0.5 SM 0.5-10.0 SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, fine-grained, light red brown, dry, loose; some roots. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SAND, gray-light yellow to light red brown, dry, dense; slight pinhole porosity. @ 4.0 ft. becomes moist. @ 9.5 ft. water seeping into test pit, slight caving; becomes rust red in color. TOTAL DEPTH 10.0 FT. WATER AS NOTED CAVING AS NOTED PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No.Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-3 0.0-1.0 1.0-3.0 SM SM 3.0-13.0 SP TOPSO1L: SILTY SAND, fine-grained, light red brown, dry, loose; some roots. ARTIFICIAL FILL - UNDOCUMENTED (Qafu): SILTY SAND, gray brown, dry, loose; 2 to 3 inch tree roots; 5 inch diameter broken sewer pipe. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SAND, fine- grained, gray-yellow-brown, moist, dense. @ 9.0 ft. water seeping into test pit. @ 9.0 - 13.0 ft. wet; becomes rust red. TOTAL DEPTH 13.0 FT. WATER AS NOTED NO CAVING TP-4 0.0-1.0 SM 1.0-9.0 SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, fine-grained, light red-brown, dry, loose; with many fine roots and a high percentage of composed organic material. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SAND, fine- grained, light gray-yellow, dry, moderately dense to dense; well cemented. @ 3.0 ft. becomes slightly moist; less dense. @ 7.0 ft. becomes rust red, moist. TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No.Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-5 0.0-1.5 SM 1.5-10.0 SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, light red brown, dry, loose; roots throughout. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SAND, fine- grained, light yellow-gray, slightly moist, dense; well sorted; slight pinhole porosity. @ 6.0 ft. becomes rust red. @ 9.0 ft. becomes wet: slow seepage. TOTAL DEPTH 10.0 FT. WATER AS NOTED NO CAVING TP-6 0.0-1.0 1.0-9.0 SM SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, light red brown, dry, loose; roots; 1 inch diameter iron pipe at 0.5 ft.; some clay. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SAND, fine- grained, light yellow gray, slightly moist, dense; well sorted. @ 7.0 ft. becomes moist, rust-red. @ 8.0 ft. wet, very slow seepage into test pit. TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. WATER AS NOTED NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 Test Pit No.Depth (ft.) USCS TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS Description TP-7 0.0-2.0 SM 2.0-8.0 SM SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, light brown, dry, slightly dense; with some clay; roots throughout. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SILTY SAND, light yellow to gray brown, slightly moist, dense; some clay; highly weathered. @ 5.0 ft. SAND, fine-grained, clean, light yellow to rust red, slightly moist to moist, moderately dense; becomes less weathered. TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING TP-8 0.0-1.0 SM 1.0-8.0 SM SP TOPSOIL: SILTY SAND, light brown-red, dry, loose; with some clay; some roots. TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): SILTY SAND, light yellow to gray brown, moist, moderately dense; with some clay; slight pinhole porosity. @ 5.0 ft. grades to SAND, fine-grained, clean, rust red, slightly moist, dense. TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING KR/0002 PACIFIC SOILS EIMGHMEEHIIMG. INC. APPENDIX Work Order 400829 December 18, 2001 LABORATORY ANALYSES The following laboratory tests were performed on representative samples in accordance with the latest standards from the ASTM and the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Compaction Characteristics Laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content determinations were made in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557 utilizing the bulk samples obtained from representative soils and bedrock types to determine their compaction characteristics. Results of these tests are presented in Table II. Direct Shear Determinations Direct shear tests were performed on "undisturbed" samples and samples which were remolded to 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density in accordance with ASTM:D 3080. Prior to testing, the samples were inundated under confinement for approximately 24 hours. Tests were made under various normal loads at a constant rate of strain of 0.05-inch per minute. Shear test data is presented in Table II, Plate B-1 and Plate B-2. Hydrometer Analyses Hydrometer grain size analyses were performed on the minus No. 10 sieve portion of the samples in accordance with ASTM:D 422. These tests were used as an aid in soil classification. The results of these tests are shown on Table II. Chemical/Resistivity Selected chemical and resistivity testing is presently being conducted by Del Mar Analytical. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. UJ £°>_ O CM — J- CO 38*?s° LL O oc (0 O_c d> 0)0) UJ o(0Q. 4, 3, 3, 3,, 3, 2,' CM ^2.i IDs«wUJ fE 2,( w |v (0 1,i 1,J 1,( i r symbol • DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% X)0 - -- r 50 oco - - ---cOU 300 7CA - - - - -OU •)en . _ .. . .iou r 50 )OO >cn • --:OU ft^r\ •-- --rou >cn:OU o ::::::......: 0 500 .3 [ . . .3 [ ... - -4 1 - - 3 ! . i . . j ( i. _ 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS lbs./ft 2 SAND (Qt) SP COHESION 100 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 31 degrees boring depth (ft.) syr TP-2 3.5 nbol boring depth (ft. if,nB DIRECT SHEAR TEST iPACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 771 5 Convoy Court, S.D. CA 921 1 1 (858)660-1713 W.0. 400829 PLATE B-1 4, 3, 3, 3,J 3,( 2,' CM £ 2 ' COs«WLU {E 2,( W i 1,:Ul " 1,i 1,' 1,< C ^ DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% 7cr\ ._ „/ou ^OU -H ^nn ...--_-.__. ..._._.... JCrv . _-___.. . ^_ ;. yen . --__- . - >cn . - - ---OU 7Cf\ ,-----.__- . . , »cn : - n .};. ^ . . j j 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 NORMAL STRESS IbsVft 2 symbol • SAND (Qt) SP !-_--.-.. ; .... 3,500 COHESION 0 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 33 degr 4,000 ees boring depth (ft.) symbol TP-3 11.0 boring depth (ft.) IK IE DIRECT SHEAR TEST 1 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 Convoy Court, S.O. CA 921 1 1 (858)560-1713 W.0. 400829 PLATE B-2 APPENDIX D 2<s?<> 1 ff 1o-_j . CO u —i o> LL •£*^ Jj; -I<NI ^ - SS>- y 51Zfi.. CO m LU § !^C tt CN 0^CM ^4008M\829\829F5 OLU 55 (J § <B -2 O Oh. =z co |t|| CO Q «^" _j "g . ?|fS ™D %""~ W T65e-°. ?fl° Z) ^ «| E ^CO u) * n >» 1 5 1 1 — > < »i \\ \ \V \ \ \ A- \•i V — , y ^_ I ^ i ? ?3 C w •o ^S ^(AS 73 CD -S? "* ^ ~m. o*i} 2 •« ^*EH(0 >U. OQ J«51»io °3n g> £0 U. | COCO o CN c^ ' S CO PLATE C-1 £1o?_l - Si=! ? <D •§) "5 z UJ atCMoo v (I) O).20rein d crT3LU5i ^8 CO" ,raq °^ os§^§ *|S5«§£ 1?^J iSlSg Si ^ § •ooi Q.O Ifl m oID 0 2 O73 o(M oCM PLATE C-2 SURFICIAL SLOPE STABILITY SLOPE SURFACE FLOW LINES Assume: (1) Saturation To Slope Surface (2) Sufficient Permeability To Establish Water Flow Pw = Water Pressure Head=(z)(cosA2(a)) Ws = Saturated Soil Unit Weight Ww = Unit Weight of Water (62.4 Ib/cu.ft.) u = Pore Water Pressure=(Ww)(z)(cosA2(a)) z - Layer Thickness a = Angle of Slope phi = Angle of Friction c = Cohesion Fd = (0.5)(z)(Ws)(sin(2a)) Fr = (z)(Ws-Ww)(cosA2(a))(tan(phi)) + c Factor of Safety (FS) = Fr/Fd Given: Calculations: Ws (pcf) z(ft)a (degrees)(radians) phi (degrees)(radians) c (psf) 135 Pw 26.565051 0.4636476 31 0.5410521 100 u Fd Fr FS 1.60 99.84 108.00 169.80 1.57 Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.PLATE C-3 o - °s CO I </> §UJ IT O> OCM <00 ffi .SoQ. 5-• w 5 oIlls fSS~~•gw 0Ills "6 S; 0Vw^z f/\ (D O §g •oo o.o JO o •o o 0 £ < «o oa (O o CM O <D O ^ O CM PLATE C-4 APPENDIX PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS These specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements for the development of the project. These specifications shall be the project guidelines for earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling agency. L GENERAL A. The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. B. The project Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall provide testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. C. All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be accomplished by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. D. It is the Contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fills to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil Engineer. The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil Engineer to be unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill. E. The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills. H. SITE PREPARATION A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials determined by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted fills shall be removed and wasted from the site. Where applicable, the Contractor may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for the project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in designated areas onsite. After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as recommended by the Soil Engineer/Engineering Geologist. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 2 B. After the removals as delineated in Item II, A above, the exposed surfaces shall be disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. The prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture condition, mixed as required, and compacted and tested as specified. In areas where it is necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to placing fill, it will be the contractor's responsibility to notify the proper authorities. C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer and/or the controlling agency for the project. HI. COMPACTED FILLS A. Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill, provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer. Deleterious material not disposed of during clearing or demolition shall be removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer. B. Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken offsite, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. D. All fills, including onsite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved prior to importation. E. The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compacted shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture condition and a uniform blend of materials. All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction cannot be attained. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 3 F. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below the limit specified by the Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blended until a uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved. Where the moisture content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the limits specified. G. Each fill layer shall be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer. In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer to the contrary, the compaction standard shall be ASTM:D 1557-91. H. Where a slope receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to one-vertical, the fill shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer. I. Side hill fills shall have a minimum key width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil Engineer in the field. J. Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist. K. The contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization fills as directed by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing agency for the project. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure which produces the designated result. L. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or creep material into rock or firm material; and the transition shall be stripped of all soil or unsuitable materials prior to placing fill. The cut portion should be made and evaluated by the Engineering Geologist prior to placement of fill above. M. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer. Finished surfaces of these pads may require scarification and recompaction. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 4 IV. CUT SLOPES A. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes and shall be notified by the Contractor when cut slopes are started. B. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to treat these problems. C. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face the same direction as the prevailing drainage. D. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. E. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer or Engineering Geologist. V. GRADING CONTROL A. Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer and/or his representative during the progress of grading. Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to evaluate-the eompaetion-and-moisture cempKance-ef~each4ayer-x>f-fiU:—Density- tests shall be performed at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative. B. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed over an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Where the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture content and density of the fill are within the limits previously specified. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 5 D. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded area until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. E. Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling and compacting operations in order that he will be able to state in his opinion all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved specifications. F. After completion of grading and after the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be submitted. No further excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior notification of the Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist. IV. SLOPE PROTECTION All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted and/or protected from erosion in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. \ CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL TYPE A PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL "NATURAL GROUND •COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE) TYPICAL BENCHING —**—BEDROCK SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "A "(PLATE 6-2) NOTE-FINAL 20' OF PI PEAT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED TYPE B PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL -NATURAL GROUND COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE) BEDROCK—^atv ^»——«^. _-<?<*"'l^^C^^^F^ TYPICAL BENCHING I ^. OV.K I -SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "B"(PLATE 6-2 ) NOTE:FINAL 20'OFPIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED PLATE G-l PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W.O. DATE CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS ALTERNATE I PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL FILTER MATERIAL MIN.VOL. OF9FT3/LIN. FT.6 IN. MIN. A* I f IN. 0 ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE WITH MIN. 8 PERF. ,1/4 IN. 0 PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF OF PIPE. ASTM DZ75I.SDR350R ASTM D3O34, SDR35 OR ASTM DI527, SCHD.40 ASTM 01785, SCHD.40 12 IN.MIN 6 IN. MIN IN.MIN B~l FOR CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF5OO FEET USE 8 IN. 0 PIPE 6 IN. MIN. ^\ A-2 ALTERNATE 2 FILTER MATERIAL WRAPPED IN FABRIC I IN. MAX. GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC I IH. MAX.CRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 9 FT. /FT. MIRAFI I4O FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT, {TYPICAL) 6 IN. MIN. /OVERLAP PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINAL FOR ALTERNATES A2 AND B2 NATIVE BACKFILL _UIRAFI I4O FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT I IN. MAX. OPEN GRADED GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT NON-PERF 6IN.0 MIN PERF.6IN. 9 UIN. PIPE 6 IN. MIN. OVERLAP A-3 ALTERNATE 3 PERFORATED PIPE SURROUNDED . WITH FILTER MATERIAL FILTER MATERIAL 9 FT/FT. - PERFORATED PIPE C IN. f MIN. 6 IN. MIN. COVER 4 /N. MIN.BEDDING \ fT^6 IN. MIN.\> OVERLAP 4 IN. MIN. BEDDING FILTER MATERIAL SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING UN. 3/4 IN. 3/8 IN. NO.4 HO. 6 N0.30 NO. SO NO. SOO IOO 90-IOO 4O-IOO 25-40 18-33 5-15 O-7 O-3 PLATE 6-2 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING WC. W.O. _^__ DATE 2 o* * *-•ss *££ *o o oto to *• t. ._ X> I 11 CM 10 •,«5tv> O«= ccs *5* P .5 SM! to to *•«•T __ ^* m occ o o O c" § (\J to•q Itnto :« 8^ i"life $ 'S.*-1 'f§** * Q ? -Q1* C .r-- r\ C tt) 4> "» w*-£s S,^^k oSp VDI ^^ ?•**« UJ|3 3Uj § Q v?u. Ip: CO ^ -c a> oECVJw£: d<Z 3i|XT •» *Jt^as v>c *; I ii|*> ? OiO »>-C o j> O k. •V Cut Lot '*? 5' min » ./&/>Unweothered Bedrock •Overexcovote ond Recompoct Cut-Fill Lot (Transition) ^\-5' min. Compacted Fill ond Recompoct Unweathered Bedrock 'deeper overexcovotion may be required by the soils engineer in steep cut-fill transition areas PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, W. O. DATE PLATE 6-4 to6UJ s- UJ»- Oz u2trUJ2UJCO_JoI/) ou. o c"5*s•J=P > i_ -c- E-o8£l\ttoj«o.oi\ -° °- E!i _ o c Q) O "> Ou_ *0>.o (75 IT £ *6"55o OJ LJIdObJ(O_J O(O ou. LU Q Selective Grading Detail for Stabilization Fill Unstable Material Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope » , «t^ ^^V- >? -^.x-- \ mm. j ' ^^ j^S$S& •^ ^^ ' " i ' i n M^ll U i/uiifij!' ^\ o x**' iflS* ^^»»iuAV^Wipm\>!W^**«^ft ^ w>" ^nvixoiniwiTiiHiiiiif^t^*^ 16 .^*"i«MiuiffiiiriiiiiKitv• »rtt)' vOiiKiiimjriiitf'j' i.imnJfex -x ,-«A° >"• • ' oi**" «• 'V^SSSCxS.^^__ x^ . »0' ^^iiiiii«nTi i iifciJft^Vsw *^1 u .ftnn\i<miiii,iiiifwl(\\-' H ^fl^r,S!Sf^Compacted Fill ^^"IniliiH ninnliiiiiif 1'i ^/^'"'""iiitjititnt i"ily i ^-^^^gs^L.^^^^^ ^ / ^ T- > 'tilted toe* < mi n.) "*"< > ^^^^ "* / 1 f recommended by the s \NiSrtSI ' I/ ivif/i rnmnnrlfii fill IS • -.**"**^***^ ^ **t*° ^ \y^ ^.x**^ ^ ^^***^ Finished Ground UMI Q W Unweothered Bedrock or approved material sils engin$er./geologist, the remain ingmay require removal and replacement ee Plate G~3) NOTE' 1. Subdrains are not required unless specified. 2. "w" shall be equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For slopes greater than 25feet "w" shall be Determined by the project soils engineer/geologist. At no time shall "w" be less than H/2. PLATE G-7 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. WO rtATr i 1 CO \\ 1« ^«}1 \ -^\ \\ § t1 00Iaf ; C!) CO § O UJ O5 UJ Q: a!Uj .ojo fco QQiQQ * Q. OO I fio ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL FINISH GRADE CLEAR AREA FOR FOUNDATIONS, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS 10' or as described by report 03 FINISH SLOPE FACE •—' WINDROW 1 (TYPICAL) : IF NECESSARY, OVERSIZED MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE 15 FOOT ZONE WITH SPECIAL EOUIPMEN^SUCH AS A ROCK RAKEfPRIOR W PLACING THE NEXT FILL LIFT. TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (END VIEW) HORIZONTALLY PLACED COMPACTED FILL GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED TO FILL VOIDS NOTE: COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE BROUGHT UP AT A HIGHER ELEVATION ALONG WINDROW SOGRANULAR SOIL CAN BE FLOODED IN A "TRENCH CONDITION". PROFILE VIEW PLATE G-/0 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W.O. DATE ii B"* ssB «> -S•^f ^t> x1^§.-?£ C"55 "to 6 «»IS^5!IIIf II* I?CM o IS 8 o fc15 8SH ' v> o f GiT-03-2002 THU 12:56 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 02 City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPUANCT PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to Issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit withou^ a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s):/?/6L Project Description: /) £f '. BUILDING TYPE: Residential:Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling "? 2 7 /> Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions; Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of applicant's information: SC Feet Floor Area. Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) OL DISTRICTS WITHIN Date: E CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature:Date: 10 "^H^OJ/DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faracfay Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 - FAX (760) 602-8560 Rewicsrt d/17/nn CST-03-2002 THU 12:57 Ptl CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX MO. 760 602 8558 P, 03 *»»***************************************++*+***+*****************•*******•************************ THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER <^T»Vx>^ GayJen Freeman x Assistant SuperintendentBusiness Sarvicaa tarlsbsd Unified School District «.ri a/17/nn 01-21-2003 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02327 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: TODD GRAY 1165 CHESTNUT AV CBAD PCR Lot #: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW SLATERY RES 165SF W.I. CLOSET OVER DINING ROOM , Owner: Status: ISSUED Applied: 12/23/2002 Entered By: SB Plan Approved: 01/21/2003 Issued: 01/21/2003 Inspect Area: 6219 01/21/03 0002 01 02 CGP 120-00 339 FOREST PL 940-9391 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120.00 $0.00 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$120.00 Jnspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 \, PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By. Date / 7^*~ "7 -ere. Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use /Vbescription of WorkIA#&& trv.z; , Q/2. CONTACT PERSON flf different from applicant) SO. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms T P/. Name ' / Address City 3, , APPLICANT Q Contractor Q Agent for Contractor Q Owner Q Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone #Fax* Address City State/Zip Telephone # PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # CONTRACTOR • COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone it Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION <• ' " Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. l~l I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION s . I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: l~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). n I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). n I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES |~|NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? d YES d NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~1 YES l~| NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? £] YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. a. cc^iiiiriciiiiJNiifflGENCY . I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME _ LENDER'S ADDRESS __ 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned j at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE---y'^^'7 ^ _ DATE YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In fartnersnip with, government for Euibfing Safety DATE: January 2, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O2-2128(PCRO2-3*27) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue PROJECT NAME: Slatterly Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone ' Fax In Person REMARKS: Reviewed attic conversion to walk-in closet above dining room only. OK to issue" with the structural consultant signing the sheet and verifying the placement of the HD2A at the juncture of the kitchen and the dining room per the structural calculations on the last page. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/24/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Driye, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 02-2128(PCR02-3627) January 2,2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: O2-2128(PCR02-3627) PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: January 2, 2003 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1165 Chestnut Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA | Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier cb •<r By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: C] Repetitive Fee Repeats $120.00 Complete Review D Other m_ Hourly D Structural Only Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee $96.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet of macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number:o> 7=321 Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential: }\ Bill Number of New Dwelling Units / Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU X Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of applicant's information: Square Feet Floor Area Carlsbad Unified School District 01 Pine Ave. CarisT5acreA-92e694Z29-9291) SCHOOTTDtSTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized^ sign on/0eha)faf the Owner. Signature:Date:'03 SCHQOLTJI8TRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To Be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue R*vi«Pri4/17/nn Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 6O2-270O • FAX (76O) 602-8560 THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE Assistant Superintends*Business Services NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT Csrlsbad Unifld Sdioo! District oni i.'!,•..< t>i'A»iiaO'J'l i -'«'•' <vj<..!llic DATE PHONE NUMBER 760 Rovfeorl d/17/nn . I a i 'ROM : TRGRftY FflX NO. : 7609409391 Dec. -23 2002 02:06PM P2 ADRIAN* MIAOUS CON8ULTWO : TRGRflY FPX NO. : 7609409391 Dec. 23 2002 02:07PM P3 ADWAKADRAOU3 CONSUL-TWO TRGRflY FAX NO. : 7609409391 Dec. 23 2002 02:07PM 3- i I A 8 I II11 c i fcSCC * »s i*«& * 8* 9 I i * s* • 5• » *s - 8 * • 5> » 3 |! f!8;t111 i §1* u KROM : TRGRftY FflX NO. : 7609409391 Dec. 23 2002 02:08PM P5 FROM : TRGRflY FflX NO. : 7609409391 Dec. _23 2002 02:08PM P6 -'/I I~J\Oiw — '> W£ Z-lo 1 x> <0 {i <U 3$t\\ ^MM4111l\i w-^?.V0,rf ^ rtit€-) ^X_^ X I S-h^ G 5"'^ , frf f fef>"4 >;7 1165CHESTNU15YRES165SF W.I.3INING ROOMTODD GRAYO 7^55'(A OH?HD >-n"OX20 CO TJ O Cfl m 13 "n S O O M Om i 3 r1 2 o S|sSSi05 »§S s o og sl>