HomeMy WebLinkAbout1165 HARBOR VIEW LN; ; CB060383; PermitCi.ty of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
09-14-2006 esidential Permit, Permit No: CB060383
-Building Inspeqtioh Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address: 1165 HARBOR VIEW LN CBAD
Permit Type: RESDNTL.- Su"b'Type: -RAD Status: ISSUED
Parcel No: 2061400900 Lot #: 0 Applied: 02/16/2006
Valuation: $109,760.00 Construction Type:' VN Entered By: RMA
Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 09/14/2006 # Dwelling Units: .0 Structure Type~. Issued: 09/14/2006
Bedr6oms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area:
Project Title: DONEZ RES-805 SIF 2ND STORY'ADD':, Orig PC#:
Z77 SF DECKS Plan Check*
Applicant: . - I . . Owner:
DONEZ FRANK&NAVARRO-DONEZ CARMEN DONEZ FRAN K&NAVARRO-DON EZ CARMEN
r
1165 HARBORVIEW LN 1165 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
Building Permit $577.36 Meter Size
AddTBuilding Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Recl. Water Con. Fee $0.00
Plan Check $375.28 IJ Meter Fee $0.00
Add'l Plan Check Fee $0.00~,--~ SDCWA Fee $0.00
Plan Check Discount $0.00 jv~ CFD Payoff Fee $0.00
Strong Motion Fee 4L $10.98 PFF (3105540) $0.00
Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00
Park Fee 0 f $000 - License Tax (3104193) $0.00
LFM Fee $0.0d~ License Tax (4304193) $0.00
Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00
Other Bridge Fee s(yoo Traffic Impact Fee (4306541) $0.00
BTD #2 Fee .~$0.00't,,,, Sidewalk Fee $0.00
BTD #3 Fee $0. 00 PLUMBING TOTAL. $55.00
1$0:00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $70.00
Add'I Renewal Fee 40.00-~ MECHANICAL TOTAL $39.50
Other Building Fee '$0.00-~' Housing Impact Fee $0.00
RenewalFee ,
k
HMP Fee '--"-$0.00- *1 1 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00
Pot. Water Con. Fee V M.00 - Housing Credit Fee $0.00
Meter Size \ ( , -/ $0.00 . .....
0.
00r4r
Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fed\
,,,,Master Drainage Fee
$ SewerFee $0.00
Recl. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00
~j TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,128.12
Total Fees: $1,128.12 Total Payments to' Date': $1,128.12 Balance Due: $0.00
FINAL A _ZRQVAL
lnspecto'rc Date: 01.5K Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE thp approval of your project includes the 'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as."feds/exactions." Ydu have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition; i
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
:7~4-1~1~ 'qI7105~02 /2006 001 15' FOR OFFICE,USE 0 L
PERMIT APPLICATION 4~, PLAN CHECK.,Nb.. CA~6
ESt-.' V'AL. ''CITY CIFCARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Plah Ck.,Depbsii, a ~bad, CA 2008 1635 f4radav Ave.,J C ~1`
y validate
71.1 Date
6251
Address (include Pldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address)
92.6o2p
L~qal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units
J+0~~-09,, -P
1~ Assessor's Parcel Existing Usa,,,,,,,., Proposed Use
',-;,Description of Work,, SQ. FT. #of Stories . # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms
0 a1w U, c, ; !&(J PERSON Iff % 2, CUN T,~. i fdifta erit romLap an I
-7 -7
Address City ame~ State/Zip Telephone # Fax #
n
-Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
NEW` R
N ~~(P L" IF, Got> 42 -7
Name Address City S.tate/Zip Telephone #
r C~0_NT_R&C_T0R
-~Se,c..7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to,its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter, 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exam pt therefrom, and the basis for the alle .
ged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five'hundred dollars [$5001).
Name, Add,ress,. City Stite/Zip Telephone #
k~ Licehse Class State License 4 City Business License'#
Designer Name Address City Telephone State/Zip
S a tat License #
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0, have and will,maintain a.certificate of consent to,self-ins6re for'workers"-compeniation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance 1;
1: of the work for which this permit is issued.
C] , I have and will maintain workers' compensation, -as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. 'My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date
I , THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONEHUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS)
0 ' CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which thi's permit is issued, I shall not employ any, person in any manner so as
become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of Calif ornia.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE DATE
E7— VE=W&UIL W—ULARAYROY1
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the f~llo wing reason:
1"' as -owner' of the property or my employees with wages as their sol . a r compensation, will do the work and the structure is hot intended or offered for sale
S (Sec., 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Laiw'does not,apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who doe* ,,'such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvennents are not intended or of f ered f or sale. If, however,, the building or improvement is ,
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of-proving that he did not build or improve for the pur iose of,sale)' p
9-11, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044,,.Business and Professions, Code: 'The
c s -Lawdoe 4- Contra ctor's Uen a s not apply to an owner of p.!operty.who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
El I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
YES personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for constru.ction of the proposed property improvement. C]NO
2. illhave / have not) signed an application fo~a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the following, person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address phone number contractors license number):
I plan to provide portioirii of the work,' but I ha~e* hired the f to cioordinafe,- supervise and provide the major work (include name address phon a
number / contractors license number),:-
5. 1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the foll g pert to provide the work indicated (include name address phone number,/ type
of work): ------------ 07~
PROPERTY.OWNER SIGNATVVE.,
S E: C TIT I On W. Q R clD ~.V KAU— G)P E R M I T S iO N L Y
Is the applicant or future b ilding oc ant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention:,~
'~,-:,'prog~ani under Sectioiis'255051,;-2 5533j'ior 25 . 53 1 4, of- t
i
h
,
a Presley-Tanner Hazardoijs~Substance Account Act? - 'C] NO C] YES
-is the applicantoi future building occupant require to~ 6' ~permit from theai' d' :.o tainla r pollution, control district or air quality management district? C] YES 0 NO
0 tr s the facility,to be c ns~' uct6d Within 1,000 feet of the outer-boundary of a sch6of site? 0 YES C] NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE ~REQUIREMENTS'OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
Ub CiDNS Ncy F ~r-
1) I,hereb affirm.that there is construction leridinq ag~ncy for the'performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S,NAME,' LENDER'S ADDRESS
1~ _A X 'Ck _ANT, RT_1
J I certifv~that I have reaa the application and state that the'above informati6n is correct.and that the information on the plans'is accurate. I agree to comply with all
dity,ciidinance'sand State,laws relating to building construction., I hereby authorize representatives, of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned'~,
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE'TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILIT 4 JUDGMeNtS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
09HA:., 'An 6SH9 pdrmit'is required for excavations over 5~9` deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every, permit issued by the building -Official unaer the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work'*
I? 70N71 'D~
g oc !V. ;n
authorized by such permit is not commenced, within 180 days from the date, of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandone&'
`~'at-ary4ime, after the wor0s' 'commenced for a period of,180'dais (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE -
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant' PINK: Finance
Inspection List
Permit#: CB060383 Type: RESDNTL RAID DONEZ RES-805 SF 2ND STORY ADD
677 SIF DECKS
Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Commerits
-09/10/2008 89 Final Combo PY AP
-'09/10/2008 89 Final Combo RI
06/11/2008 23 Gas/Test/Repairs WC
06/11/2008 89 Final Combo PY CO see notice attached. Gas meter
released/reset
_t~,'04/01/2008 92 Compliance Investigation PY PI
03/03/2008 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY AP
.163'/03/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY AP
03/03/2008 24 Rough[Topout PY WC
02!27/2008 84 Rough.Combo PY PA cold water bond & combustion air
~,_~,,02/21/2008 18 Lath/Drywall 'Exterior PY WC
%02/21/2008 84 Rough Combo PY CO SEE -NOTICE ATTACHED
02/20/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY WC
'01/22/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's PY AP
84* Rough Combo' PY NR
01/15/2008 92 Compliance Investigation PY PI
*'Roof/Reroof -.12/05/2007,15 PID PA
11 /26/2007 33 Service Change/Upgrade PID AP
'10/05/2007 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AID
09/12/2007 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP NS CALLED FRANK, LEFT MESSAGE
10/04/2006 106 & Safety (C ED Cl EMAIL FM/TO C. HINES @ SID COUNTY
HEALTH DEPT. THEY WILL MOVE
A TOWARDS CONDEMNATION.
9k el,4~
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 Page 1 of 1
City of Carlsbad Bldg, I nspection. Request
For: 09/10/2008
Permit# CB060383 Inspector Assignment: PY
Title: DONEZ RES-805 SF 2ND STORY ADD
-Description: 677 SF DECKS S,
"7ype: RESDNTIL Sub Type: RAD
Phone: 7604346817
-1165 HARBOR VIEW LN
Suite: 1_04: 0
Location:- Inspector:
APPLICANT -DONEZ CARMEN DONEZ FRANK&NAVARRO
Owner: DONEZ FRAN K&NAVARRO-DON EZ CARMEN
Remarks:
'~tal Tirne: Requested By: FRANK DONEZ
Entered By: BINSPECT
D ption Act Comments' -'Descri
f 19 V\ V Final'Structural'
:'29 Final Plumbing
~,-r39-- Final Electrical
Final Mechanical
Comments/Notices/Holds
Associated PC Rs/CVs Original PC#
Inspection History
-Date\ Description Act Insp Comments
06/11/2008 23 Gas/Test/Repairs WC Py
'61 ~/2008 89'Final Combo CO PY see notice attached. Gas meter released/reset .0
—04/01/2008 92 Compliance Investigatior PI Py
03/03/2008 17 Inter ior Lath/Drywall' AP PY
03/03/2068: 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY
03/03/2008 24 Rough/Topout I WC Py
-j 02/27/2008 84 Rough Combo PA PY cold water bond & combustion air
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall WC py, .4%102/21/2'008.'
02/21/2008 84 Rough Combo CO PY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED
18. Exterior Lath/Drywall WC Py
01/22/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY
0~/;i2/2008 84 Rough Combo NR PY
01/15/2008 92 Compliance Investigation PI Py
41:
EsGil Corporation
In Tartnership with Governmentfor Building Safety
DATE~. 05/9~/06 L3 APPLICANT
JURISDICTION:. darlsbad E3 PLAN REVIEWER
PLAN*:CHECK'NO.:
1
06-038
1
3 SET: H
L3 FILE
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1165 Harborview Lane
~PROJECT NAME: Room Addition/Decks for Donez Residence
F -1 the plans trafismitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The *~Ians-transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans tl~ansrnitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list~
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
- 4
,,Theffieck list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicani",
gontact person.,
F-1 `~The'allpliciant's copy of the checklist has been sent to:
~Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Es I Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. "'gi
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: Fax #:
'Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS: ,Complete special inspection form for epoxy bolts. Deck is 677 sq ft - Addition 805.
By: Ray Fuller Enclosures:
-*7. Esgil Corporation
El. GA 171 MB' El EJ El PC (P), 05/01/06 trnsmtl.dot
208 San Diego, California 92123 (858) 560-1468 Fax,.(858) 560-1576 --9i2O Ches.apeake Drive, Suite
0
EsGil Corporation
In (Partnership with governmentfor Building Safety
DATIE- ~02/26/016.-. C3 APPLICANT
(~Q~Q R I ~S~
JURISDICTION:' Carlsbad. C3 PLAN REVIEWER
Q FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.:'06-0383 SET: I
PRbJ ECT,AD DRESS: 1165 Harbdrview Lane
PROJECT NAME: Room Addition/Decks for Donez Residence
The plan s transmitted herewith, have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
,with the jurisdiction's building codes.
A.
J71 _..The plans'transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes-
when minor' deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. -
T p he, ians transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and-should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
"71 Th~echeck list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil V\J
Cor*ation Lintil,c'orrected plans are submitted for recheck.
~The. eipplicant's
- copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
:con,tact person.,
F71,, v\,j Thelap~plidant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Carlos Avila,
~1 1382 Andorra Court Vista, Ca. 92081
~Esgil Corpbration staff did not~advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. -
Esgil'66rp'oration'staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
'-'Person contacted: Caflos Avila Telephone #: ((760) 727-0111
'Date contact6d: a '(by: Fax #: ~,amg
M I Tee ai I OhonelxFax- In Person
REMARKS:-
By: Ray Fuller Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
trnsmtl.dot q: G, A El M13' El EJ El PC 02/21/06
Tv
9320'Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 (858) 560-1468. Fax (858) 560-1576
21,
Carlsbad 06-0383
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
'SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-0383 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROj'E,CT ADDRESS: 1165 Harborview Lane
FLOOR AREA: STORIES: 2
,kdditi6h 805
HEIGHT:. 21 ft per UBC Decks'770 -
REMARKS:,-
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY. DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:,, ESGIL CORPORATION: 02/21/06
DATE, INITiAL-PLAN ~REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller
COMPLETED: 02/26/06
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This-plan review'is-limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform' Plumbing Code, Uniform. Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other,corrections
based on Jaws and 6rdinance by the Planning. Department, Engineering Department, Fire.
Department or oth er departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the'-issuance of a building. permit.
Present. California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition' of
the'
.
California Building'.Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,,~ ,
'2000, UPC, 2000 UMC and,2002 NEC.
The'above, regulations -apply to residential construction, regardless the code editions adopted.
by ordinance.'
The'following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
b 6 th efor e p!ans will be in; conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.A.3,1
.1997 Uniform Bdilding Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any,
state,county or city law. -
.-To-.speed u~ the :recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.-
--"-Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Cailsbad 06-0383
'02/26/06
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction.
i
.Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted
in one of two ways:
1 -Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760)
602-2700. The Citywill route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Plahnin g,,Engineering and Fire Departments.
2). Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
-1468. 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560
Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of'
Carlsba'd Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
.NOTE 'Plans that' are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by_!
EsGil Corporation is complete
2% ."Verfiy that the' final sets of plans and the calculations provided were not stamped,
or signed by engineer and /or architect of record also.
3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall
e 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which Icomply with th
'adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 2002 NEC. Plans are
reflecting -older codes on the Title sheet.
-A' The scope of work needs to include the sq footages of th e decks (770?).
5. Provide'LC.B.O. Research Report and number for metal stairway, or submit
plans and calculations and approved fabricator registered with the building
department or note that the stairway fabrication plans shall be submitted to and.
he-buildinb official prior to installation. approved by.t
6., If applies: On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a
note - Oferred submittal (spiral stair case etc.). Additionally, provide the following
on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal
items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall revie\#~
them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the
deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been
ce with the design of the building. The deferred "found.to be in general conforman
submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents'
have been approved by the building official."
Carlsbad 06-0383.
02/26/06.
Please recheck all details to verify that they are complete and/or correct. See for
-.example where detail bubbles are incomplete on A2 (stairs/rear of game room).
Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than
the furnace or furnaces being installed. UIVIC Section 904. 1.
4. 9. Show or note that doors may open to the exterior only if the exterior landing is
not than more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 1003.3.1.6
Se6 bedroom 4/game room for example on A2.
'-,,Recheck plans for tempered window locations i.e. within 2 ft of interior/exterior
doors, shower/tub areas and stairwells if applicable. See for example windows at."
..the stairi.'Verfly window at bath a minimum of 5 above tub or must be tempered,
4050 next to door 8A etc. Recheck all'locations.
".11'. Specify how obtaining the required minimum 1/4 inch per foot deck slope for.
drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers; slope framing etc. If ripping, note maximum taper
cut.and calculations to. reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist.
.12. 1~ exi~ting electrical panel location unaffected by proposed addition(s) and is it
adequate for the additional.sq footage proposing?
ecthcal plan to reflect locations (not.-. general notes) of new T-24
requir,em6nts f6r all- rooms i.e. photo control motion detectors, occupancy
-,sensors, dimmers, verify plans reflect locations of required fluorescents/ high
:,efficacy lighting. etc. The interior and exterior lighting energy design shall be
fully detailed on the floor plans. Notes~ are not acceptable. Floor plan
description to include fixture types and control methods demonstrating
compliance with the following requirements:
''In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be
high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor.
A: All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be
controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer. (Closets under 70
square feet are exempt).
-:Outdoo , r lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a
combination photocontrol/motion sensor.
Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with
electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR
!amps do not comply.
13.1' All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on thet-.-'
rt plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC A
21-0-12(b) .
-0383 Carlibid 06
--02~F6/06 -
14, _7 Engineer of record to address continuous vented ridges as shown on A3.
-.-Show,how the integrity of the roof diaphragm is maintained
15." . Scale on sheet A4 should be 1/8' instead of 1/4" noting?
16L. Elevations are reflecting glass railing. Specify thickness of glass, note to be
,"tempered and provide design calculations and Building Officials approval if no
top. rail to be provided per Section 2404.
1 ".Using same keynote 5 on 1501 at 15/Dl -one at wall and one at guardrail?
'4ail'and reference how beams will be supported where they intersect over A 8., be
p9st(s) i.e. ECCLL's at the corners?
Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record has reviewed the truss
calculation package prepared by others (i.-e-.,- a:~rpview" stamp on the truss
, 4~c- cal6ulatiohs or a letter). Section 106.3.4. 1.
'1, 20' 'Plans to detail and reference ridge support i.e. post to reflect positive
connections from hip to king post below, king. post to beam etc.
21'. -".!-'In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge
support. Section 2303:8.
22.- Could 66t'determine why. reflecting detail 5/S6: to the Adge on S5?
23- Detail arid, reference all shear locations with a detail showing shear extending to,
'-flo6r/rbof sheathing. Detail to include edge nailing of roof diaphragm to members.
-'-,-i'below and shear transfer to the top/sill plate's etc Minimum 2 details maybe
t 7 required i.e. if-and when shear walls are perpendicular to roof framing/trusses
(blocking panels) and when shear walls are parallel to roof framing members.
24., Could'hot locate where soils report addressed the potential for seismically,
induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section
ilt 1804.5
-25. P 'ide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, rov
"gr
ading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents required per page 4 of the soil
report)., -
-'~6. Overturning load path to continue to foundation or show in calculations that dead
loads from floor framing can resist these loads. Could not locate for example
details of Strong Walls to PLM's below or how the connections to PLM's to post
"and post to foundation are shown to resist these uplift forces.
-0383', Carlsbad 06.
02/26/06
I - - O'bea -L ..27., Verfiy any ms used to resist shear walls need to be designed per Table 16
~`it" #49nd,1630.8.2 ern
'id ;26. ov e Strong Wall,details and reference to the plans.
29 - How are floor loads transferred around spiral stair case opening —no blocking
/edge nailing required ?
30'-.~' Plans need to be reviewed by designer of record, stamp and signed showing that
Aans match calculations which in turn show a complete vertical %details and floor p
i_ ..and lateral load path to the foundation. Some things noticed for example was
that shear wall lengths do not appear to match calculations i.e. line 3, ke - I
'~calculations requiring SSW's and plans reflect SW's instead, etc. Please go thru
plans carefully and,~erify calculations and plans match. Structural will be
f6 dhecked its entirely when this is completed.
JA.
31-*-,- Detail and reference how adding additional anchor'bolts at new shear wall
locations where existing footings occur and detail and reference retro fit hold
9 down bolis. Specify type, size and len' th of bolts using for shear and if special
in~oection is required. For retro fit hold down-bolts-note size of all thread, depth
of embedment, ICBO/NER number for epoxy using and note special inspection
etails". Complete attached special required on cover sheet and reference d
inspection form if required?
'To ss, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction speed up, the review proce
,~item has been a.ddressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page,
etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of'corrections from this list. If the're are other changes, please briefly describe
-~them and,where they are located in the plans.
Have~61-ianges beeh made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
ind icate:
No - El Yes, Q
i'~ Thq jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at9320Chesapea.ke,'.,
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468,. -
to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding
thes6 plan' review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank
-0383~ Ca-risbad 06,
02/26/06
SkCIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4(05 HN213C~Vksw L WE
J. to -026a OWNER'SNAME: PLANCHECK NUMBER.
*1,-as the owner, oragentof the owner (contractors maynotemploythe special inspector), certifythat 1, or,.
the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the spEkQlal inspector(s) as required by
Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project loca t the site listed above.-
UBC Section 106.3.5.,
Signed
1, 'as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special
program as.required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located
at th6site listed above.
FESS/0
A.'
En chitect'
re & Signatu
cc NO. 63638
Here, -Exp.12-31.0t,
C Signed
1 Lik of worV requiring special inspection:
7__ Cl soils Compliince Prior to Foundation Inspection Field Welding
C1 . Structural Concrete Over. 2600 PSI E] High Strength Boilting
Prest~essedl Concrete Expansion[Epoxy Anchors
'Structural Masonry El sprayed-on Fireproofing
EJ-Designer Specified EJ Other
g JR i~~ rof d idual(s) orfirrn-(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above:
I to im - e C v-m iri e
Z. 16 ? It Z_2~ 7 e 0 X
C.
3- Duties of the'special inspectors for the work listed above:
*7 0 b ier, 7 ms, P-ct a r lexe .77 Ep 10 Y11/6100 7QY
A c- v-!s
Special inspectors shali check in with the City and present their credentials for 'approval prior to beginning
work on the job site,
00/., eOO 90 :oz 000z,*eT,.E[aa
Carlsbad 06-0383
02/26/06
.o Isba city. J_..-,C a r =Mom
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF.REQUIPiEMENT)FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No. 06-0383 1 7.
T job Address or Legal Description 1165 HarborviewLan
owner. VV-0,WY— E;bW1E.7_ Address lu;a; EW L
vv~ -
IN
in addition to the(-- SPM V 16fion p''rovided by tbe You are bereby, notified that MESEW isin
Building Department- an approved Registered Speci SpeMFV 140'1,redi~ provide continUOLIS
ion during the ance C1.16i). i pated'on the reverse side of
...ir).Spedi perform, of the ph, es o co
sheet! A:D 0
The Registered Special lnsp~ctor shall be approved by the Cit~ of Carlsbad Building
Department prio.r to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los.Angeles, or ICBO are approved as'.
Spe6al Tn specters for the type of construction for. ~vhlich tl~cy are certlifi ed'
The insppctions by a Speei'Al Inspector do not change. ij3~ requirements'for inspections by
personnel of the City,of Carlsbad building department" The. inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normall'
- required by th6 Count' Building:., y y
Code-
The Special Inspector is*not a'hil~o'n'iz'cd Oin d~ k.`othef than that for which spett an apptove anyk.woLl
he/slie']~ sp6cificaRy assigned to inspect- Thle" Sp"Pcial lnsp~eci_O-T- is -not ~authonized to accept
alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests'for plan changes. The Special Inspector is
required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that
he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special
,,Inspection rqports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. I ~ 0
C
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perfomi. the .'special! iiispgpti ons on each of the,,
items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
(over)'-- -
GOO/ LOO*d 6ZGT# 9 0 0 z OOOZ*911625
Carlsbad 06-0383
02/26/06
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-0383
?,PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 02/26/06
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1165 Harborview Lane
-bccuPANCY:R3 BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING-
PORTION.'
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
V LUE
Addition 805 Per City Est. 98,210
Decks 770
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 99-,24,ft
judscliction Code Icb By Ordinance
Bldg.,Permit F6e by Ordinance'
Plan Check Fee by Ordi6ance
Type of Review: P Complete Review Structural Only
Other
Re"pet ve e
ep ats Hourly El Hour*
Esgill Plan Review Fee
Comment~:
r VW
$533.71
$346.911
$2
Sheet 1 of
macvalue.doc
0
Z~
f
Citv of Carlsbad.
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
ECK NO.: CB bATIi.. FLANCH
BUIL 6DFkSS: DING A. V Lei
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ll
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: EST. VALUE:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL DENIAL
-,The item you have submitted for review has been Please see the attached report of deficiencies
approved. The approval is based on plans, marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans
information and/or specifications provided in your or specifications for compliance with applicable
submittal; therefore any changes to these
'
items after codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
this. date, including field modifications, must be specifications to this office for review.
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
By:
'A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements: By:
By:
IF 7,
Date:
Date:
Date:
':FOR'OFFICIAL;USE ONLY.
GINEERING' IIATION TO I G* nkmit:: SSUE::BUILDIN AVTHOR . . ....
pate.-,.,
~
"ATT-AAICHMWS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
m N Dedi tion Application Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ
'Dedication Checklist-, City of Ca . rlsbad
El Improvement Application Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Improvement Checklist Phone: (760) 602-2775
-0 Future Imp'rovement Agreement CFD INFORMATION
Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No:
El Grading Submittal Checklist Lots:
11 kight-of-Way Permit Application Recordation:
Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract:
and Information Sheet
El Sewer Fee Information Sheet
FABUILDfg~ffrC&C FORM rlbay Xvenue e Carlsbad, CA 9200817314 - (760) 602-2720 e FAX (760) 602-7§'dA42
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
4.
SITE PLAN
is ~Np ~RD is
EJ Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn toscale. Show:.
A. North Arrow F. Right -of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets'
.-'B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths
Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral
Property Lines 1. Existing or proposed water service
Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service.
'Show on site plan:
Drainage Patterns
1 . Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5'away from building."
Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s).
that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service
'
however, second.
dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. t% Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards.
El. 3. I nclude on title sheet:.
Site address
Assessor's Parcel Number
~C. Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total,building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
r
r
0.
FMUILDING PLANCHEM CKLST FORkdoc Rev. 7/14/00 2
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
i ST ND RD 2 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
El~ -'Aa. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No.
41b. All conditions are in* compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
-5. Dedication for all 'street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and,-
for remodels. with a value at or exceeding $ 17,000 pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
W
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and
submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed
by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit.. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the- dedication process. Submit -the
completed application -form with the required checklist. items and fees to the, 4
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
F~ El, TT -6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be;
constructed at time of building construction whenever 'the value of the'
construction exceeds $ 82,000 pursuant to -Carlsbad Municipal Code Section.
18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
-Attac hed please find an* application' form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans
I
and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
-check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
F:\BOILDINGPLANCHECKCKLSTFORM.doc Rev. 7114= . . .1 .1 . . . 3
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1 S~, '2 ND RD
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improyement'Plans signed by: Date:
El 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad..
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $360 so we may,
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement'-
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
''i,EJ: El 01 66. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement
Agreement completed by:
Date:
:6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvemen ts found ad*acent to buildin _q site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
-The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
15.16.010 of the Municipal Code.
El 'El 7a. ke a determination. on grading El' Inadequate information available on Site Plan to ma
Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import,~ ..-requirements.
export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans.
El' ,76. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
..--L:~Engineer~-mu*st-.be--submifted together --with- the-completed-application- form
attached. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must be issued and rough gradinq
app oval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
r i Grading Inspecto's gn off by: Date:
El :17c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
F :SUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORMA= Rev. 7/14= 4
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
S ND' RD 2
7~ No Grading Permit required.
~7~. If grading is not required, write ."No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
F1 -'8. A RIGHT-10F-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Rightrof-Way and/or'
private work adjapent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
7~ not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming,. driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Rig.ht-of-Way permit required for:
~El, %E] 9~ INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District. personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760).438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
",10. NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best..
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
~occurs fi urs fir
occu 'rs
quired fees aria attached
/Nu-feewrequ
e
equirl c~_f i red--
-WATER METER REVIEW
F 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
'Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. - If it is oversized, for"
the life of the meter, the City will not, accurately bill the owner for the water used.
Allsingle family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.,
ROUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORMA= Rev. 7/14100 5
a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
ND RD 1S T. 2 3
If owner/developer proposes a size other than *the "standard", then
owner/de4oper must provide potable water demand calculations,'
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
.,per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing'
schedule" to'verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest -the
installation of multiple 2" services as.needed to provide the anticipated
demand. (manifolds are considered. on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street).
El E 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations.(i.n gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on.
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter statiori,.the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled ul",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should1r.,
look like:
STA 1 +00 Install 2" service and
A
105"'meter (estimated 100 gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building.
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for'
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic
-0--E 'on-at-Da4it-of-connection (P A Q) tevati
0 Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
0 Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
0 Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
F:ZUILDING PLANCHECk CKLST FORMADC Rev. 7114= 6
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
iST_ ND RD 2 .3,.,
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new rec cled water line in the future. Y.
12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
1'. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to i
*
rrigate slopes within the -development. For-
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and. implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recyc
'
led water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water.
Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which'the recycled water is.
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged.with potable water until,
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego:
Water Capacity Charge. + If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know. that we cannot guarantee the refund, and."
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
E] El, F-1 13. Additional Comments:
4V 1v
MWILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORMAM Rev. 7114100' 7
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
'Plan Check No. CB 0 Address UER-57
Planner Erin Endres Phone(760)602- 4625
0 14-2 _' APN: D-0
p'-0 a Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC
I Zoning: P-A General Plan: Facilities Management Zone:
CFD (in/out) #~_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:
Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this
permit:
CL CL L
Legend.' Item Complete El Item incomplete - Needs your action
Environmental Review Required: YES No TYPE
DATE 0 F COMPLETION:
Compliance -with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval: 4 '4,
Discretionary Action Required: YES N PE
--APPRovAURESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
C6rhpliance,hith. conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of,Approval:
[2~-O El Coastal Zone Assessment/dorn pi lance
Proj ct'site'located in Coastal Zohe? YES,--.' NO e
"-t' CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103,
'San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO
Af NO,,complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
FolloW-Up Actions:
,
-1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans).
~2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
Incluslonary Housing Fee required: YES NO ~0,
(Effective date. of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 2T, 1993.)
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N,
Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
H:\ADMIN\COUNTERSIdgPInchkRevChklst Rev 9/01
Site Plan:
,~900 El Provide a fully dimensional site pl6n drawn, to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines,,
easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way
width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard
slopes).
Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Policy 44 — Neighborhood Arch-itectural Design Guldelines*~
&I- F-1 E] 1 . Applicability: YES NO
F1 EJ
'
)RJ- 2. Project complies YE~~NO o-.
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Front: Required Shown
Interior Side: Required Shown
Street Side: Required .(.e ce, Shown
Rear: Required Shown 0
Top of slope: Required Shown
Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: Required Shown
Interior Side: Required Shown
Street Side: Required ~Shown
Rear: Required Shown
Structure separation: Required Shown
El Lot Coverage: Required. Shown:
El El ,E~- Height: Required Shown
0 E] Parking: Spaces Required Shown
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown,
F~ F-1 E] Additional Comments
-7
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPInchkRevChkist Rev 9/01
r"IETHER"INGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
SO.IL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY HYDROGEOLOGY
Project No. 5375.1
Log No. 9962
Mr:'Frank Donez
+1165 -Harbor View Lane
Carlsbad, California 92008
subject: L FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW AND PLAN CHECK RESPONSE
Proposed Second Story Addition
-1 165 Harbor View Lane
Carlsbad, California
'References: Xttached
D'e'ar Mr. Ddnez~
In, accordance 'with the reque'st of Mr. Carlos Avila, Architect, we have reviewed the
refe~~enc6d r6~orts and plans. Based on our review, it appears that the plans (Reference 3
generally -'conform to the recommendations contained in the geotechnical reports
(R derences I and'2), however, for clarity, the following information is provided.
Within the area of the proposed ground floor stairway at the rear of the existing
garage, it will be necessary to remove the existing fill down to terrace deposits and
replace these materials. as 'compacted fill. The required footing depth of 18-inches
should be measured from finish grade.
2_ Within th& 'area of the residence where no grading is proposed, the existing terrace
..,aqposits are -overlain by up to 3.5-feet of fill/colluvium and the total embedment of ,;
the new. footings should extend to a total depth of 4.5-feet below the ground surface
in order to achieve the recommended 12-inch embedment into terrace deposits.
Iii additi 'on, the follo*lng comments are provided in response to plan check Item No. 24
- `~(Re'fefen,c`e 4).
I., The -risk,of -seismically induced liquefaction within the site is considered low due to I I
-the lack, of 'Shallow groundwater and the relatively dense nature of the underlying
_.,''terrace deposits.
-,2.' The'risk of fault surface rupture due to active faulting is considered low due to the
a ence of an active fault on site. Ground cracks due to shaking from seismic events bs I
'-,in.the region are possible, as with all of southern California. .4
...5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 (760) 931-1917 Fax (760) 931-0545
32242 Pa~eo Adelanto, Suite C San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 e (949) 487-9060 * Fax (949) 487-9116
14 www.hetheringtonengineering.com 12 0 10 30P
C_11U
4;
-FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW AND PLAN CHECK RESPONSE
Proj ect No. 5 3 7 5. 1
~''Log No. 9962
-April 19: 2006
Page 2
This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you should have any questions, please
~o contact our Carlsbad office.
'Sincerely, 4
Hethering~on Engineering, Inc.
To
6h ~kohen
ESS/A tCiv1l'Engineer,41937.,. ?~DVESS/
Co fee, Ge6te6 hnica'I Engineer 2 3 46. lo
3/31/08) (expire CD No. 2W LL)
Exp. Date_
..-,,..Dist1rib.ution: A-Addressee~'
OF CA
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
REFERENCES
1. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Building Addition, 1165 Harbor View Lane,
C . arl~bad, California," by'Hetherington Engineering, Inc., dated July 17, 1990.
%,2. -Stor Addition, 1165 Harbor ."Geotechn'cal jjpAaLe Inves§ on, Prop ed Second 1~ r~ _2s _Y_:~tc_
View Lane; Carlsbad, California," by Hetherington Engineering, Inc., dated January
4,-2006.
-3. ~'f"Frdnk , and Carmen Donez, Two Story Residential Addition, 1165 Harbor View
Lan , Carlsbad-, CA 920018, (22 Sheets)" by Carlos R. Avila, Architect, dated
u~ry.10, 2006.
Fz
44. ."'Plan Check No. 06- 0383, 1165 Harborview Lane, Room Addition/Decks for Donez
Residence,"' by Esgil Corporation, dated February 26, 2006.
14
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING e ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 9 HYDROGEOLOGY
January 4, 2006
Project No. 5375.1
Log No.9699
Mr. Frank Donez
1165 Harbor View Lane
Carlsbad, California 92008
Subject: GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION.
Proposed Second-Story Addition
1165 Harbor View Lane
Carlsbad, California
References: Attached
Dear Mr. Donez:
In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical update investigation
for the subject site with respect to the proposed. second-story addition. The scope of our
geotechnical update investigation included a site reconnaissance, review of the referenced
documents, excavation of one hand-auger boring and laboratory testing of soil samples
obtained from the boring excavation. Our previous geotechnical investigative work at the
site is described in Reference 6.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located at 1165 Harbor View Lane, Carlsbad, California (see Location Map,
Figure 1). The lot presently supports a one-story, wood-frame single family residential
structure apparently founded on conventional continuous/spread footings with slab-on-
grade floors on a relatively level building pad. Appurtenances include concrete driveway
and patio slabs with lawm areas at the front and rear of the lot.
The site is bounded by Harbor View Lane to the west, and similarly developed residential
lots.to the north, south and east.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
We understand that the proposed second-story addition is located over the central portion
-of the existing one-story residence (see Plot Plan, Figure 2). We anticipate that wood-
frame construction will be utilized for the addition, and anticipate that building loads will
be typical for this type of relatively light construction.
5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 (760) 931-1917 Fax (760) 931-0545
32242 Paseo Adelanto, -Suite C a San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 e (949) 487-9060 9 Fax (949) 487-9116
www. heth e ri ngtoneng i n eeri ng. com
10%all ft
§ R X ""M M
v livo
'EX
"'kk INI; Y iff _V.,
4,
N
M . I . . . . . . . . .
--;tDR-
W
CIA
k1h
KNE
Z Rzu `4ci aRMS
nomon
7
-A
%J
—W ia N W 'M .0
MEW
ADAPTED FROW'The Thomas Guide,'San Diego County, 2004 Edition
SCALE: 1 2000'
(1 Grid 0.5 x 0.5'miles)
LOCATION: MAP
1165 Harbor View Lane HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California
~GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 5375.1 FIGURE NO. 1
GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION
Proj ect No. 5 3 7 5. 1
Log No. 9699
January 4, 2006
Page 2
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
Subsurface conditions were explored by, hand augering one boring to a depth of
approximately 3-feet below the existing site grade. The approximate location of the
boring is shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2.
The subsurface exploration was supervised by a geologist from this office, who visually
classified the soil materials and obtained bulk samples for laboratory testing. The soils
were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil
classifications are shown on the attached Boring Log, Figure 3.
LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed on the near surface samples obtained from the boring.
Tests performed consisted of the following:
Expansion (ASTM: D 4829)
-4 Sulfate Content (EPA 9038)
The laboratory test results are presented on the Laboratory Test Results, Figure 4.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
J. General
Our site reconnaissance indicates that the property is in generally the same condition
as during our previous work. Observations made from the hand auger boring indicate
that the geology is consistent with our previous work.
The proposed construction is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Grading and
foundation plans should take into account the appropriate geotechnical features of the
site. The conclusions and recommendations provided in the referenced report remain
generally applicable with minor revisions and are included herein along with seismic
parameters for structural design.
46
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION
Project No. 5375.1
Log No. 9699
January 4, 2006
Page 3
§eismic Parameters for Structural Design
Th6 following site seismic characteristics and design considerations are for use in the
'design of structural elements of the building addition.
The site is not within an earthquake fault hazard zone and no known active or
potentially active faults are located on the site, therefore, surface ground rupture is
not likely. The fault that has the . potential for generating the highest ground
accelerations at the property is the Rose Canyon, situated 8-kilometers (4.9-miles) to
the southwest.
The most significant probable earthquake to affect the property would be a 7.2
magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon fault zone. Depiction of probabilistic
4. seismic hazard analysis utilizing a consensus of historical seismic data and the
respective regional geologic conditions that are shown on "The Revised 2002
California Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Maps" (Reference 5) indicates that ground
accelerations of about 0.20 to 0.30g are possible with a 10% probability of being
exceeded in 50-years.
A 'The proposed addition should be designed and constructed to resist the effects of
seismic ground motions as provided in Chapter 16, Division IV-Earthquake Design of
the 2001 California Building Code. The basis for the design is dependent on and
consideis seismic zoning, site characteristics, occupancy, configuration, structural
system and building height.
The following seismic design coefficients are based on the 2001 California Building
-Code criteria using the Rose,Canyon fault zone at a distance of 8-kilometers (4.9-
miles). The. Rose Canyon fault zone has been assigned a maximum probable
earthquake of Moment Magnitude 7.2, a slip rate of 1.5mm/year and is a Type B
fault.
Soil Profile Type SD
Seismic Zone Factor z 0.40
Seismic Source Type B
Near Source Factor N 1.0 a
t Near Source Factor N, 1.1
Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.44
Seismic Coefficient C, 0.70
IW
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
0
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION
Project No. 5375.1
Log No. 9699
January 4, 2006
Page 4
3 Foundation Recommendations
The proposed addition may be supported on conventional continuous footin s bearing 9
in approved terrace deposits. New footings, at least 12-inches wide, should extend'to
a minimum depth of 18-inches below adjacent grade and at least 12-inches into the
terrace deposits and should be reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars, one top and
one bottom. Footings located adjacent,to utility trenches should extend below a 1: 1
plane projected upward from the inside bottom comer of the trench.
Footings, bearing as reconu-nended may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing
value of 2000-pounds-per-square-foot. This value may be increased by one-third for
loads including wind or seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of 250-pounds-per-
square-foot per foot of depth and a coefficient of friction between foundation soil and
concrete of 0.4 may be assumed. These values assume that footings will be poured
neat against the foundation soils. Footing excavations should be observed by the
-Geotechnical Consultant to ensure that they are founded in suitable bearing materials.
Based on our previous work, the existing footings for the residence are founded at a
depth of 18-inches below grade; however, the geologic unit supporting the existing
footings of the residence has not been determined for all areas of the proposed
addition. Existing footings founded in undocumented fill soil or weathered terrace
deposits could experience as much as 1/2 inch of differential settlement upon addition
of new loads from the second-story addition. If such settlement is not within the
tolerable limits of the building design, the existing footings should be underpinned so
that the footings are founded in terrace deposits in accordance with the previous
foundation recommendations.
4. Site Drainage
The following recommendations are intended to minimize the potential adverse
effects of water on the structure and appurtenances.
Consideration should be given to providing the structure with roof gutters and
downspouts.
All site drainage should be directed away from the structure and not allowed to
flow over slopes. On-site soils are sandy in nature and are easily erodible if
exposed to a regular drainage pattern.
GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION
Project No. 5375.1
Log No. 9699
'January 4, 2006
Page 5
C. No landscaping should be allowed against foundations. Moisture accumulation or
watering adjacent to foundations can result in deterioration of wood/stucco and
may affect foundation performance.
d. Irrigated areas should not be over-water. Irrigation should be limited to that
required to maintain the vegetation. Additionally, automatic systems should be
seasonally adjusted to minimize over-saturation potential particularly in the
winder (rainy) season.
e., All slope, yard, and roof drains should be periodically checked to verify they are
r
1~ not blocked and flow properly. This may be accomplished either visually or, in
the case of subsurface drains, placing a hose at the inlet and checking the outlet
for flow.
Sulfate Content
Representative samples of the on-site soils were submitted for sulfate analyses. The
results of the soluble sulfate tests per EPA 9038 methods are presented on the
attached Laboratory Test Results, Figure 4. The sulfate content of the on-site soils is
consistent with a negligible sulfate exposure classification per Table 19-A-4 of the
2001 California Building Code. Consequently, special provisions for sulfate resistant
concrete are not considered necessary.
-Foundation Plan Review
Final foundation plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant to confinn.
conformance with the recommendations presented herein or to -modify the
recommendations as necessary.
LIMITATIONS
The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site
conditions, as they existed at the time of our investigation and further assume the
excavations to be representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If
different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our exploration are
observed or appear to be present in our excavations, the Geote~hnical Consultant should
'be promptly notified for review and reconsideration of recommendations.
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
I
Michel Vasconc(e o
Professional Geol
(expires 1/31/07) VWENOQ*~~K\L
GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE INVESTIGATION
Proj ect No. 5 3 75. 1
Log No. 9699
January 4, 2006
Page 6
Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised,
under similar circumstances, by reputable Geotechnical Engineers and Engineering
Geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied,
is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report.
This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions please contact
the undersigned at your convenience.
Sincerely,
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING C.
anny Coh oFESS/04~
Registered Civil Engineer 4 tAY C
Geotechnical Engineer 23
(expires 3/31/06) No. 2346 rm,
Exp. Date,.
0 C H~A\r,
Dale Hamelehle
Co 'S 04
Certified Engineering Geologist DALE M. KAMELEHLE
Professional Geologist 5551 cc NO. 1760 CERTI RED
Distribution: 4-Addressee
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST
EXP
11 ; ),.- ~P .nl n &0
Attachments: Location Map e 1
Plot Plan Figure 2
Log of Boring Figure 3
r. 'Laboratory Test Results Figure 4
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
REFERENCES
California Division of Mines and Geology, "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard
Assessment for the State of California", Open-File Report 96-08 and USGS
Open-File Report 96-706, dated 1996.
California Division of Mines and Geology, "Maps of Known Active Fault Near
Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with the
1997 Uniform Building Code", ICBO, dated February 1998.
California Division of Mines and Geology, "Seismic Shaking Hazard Maps of
California", Map Sheet 48, dated 1999.
Cao. Tianqing, and Bryant, William A., et al., "The Revised 2002 California
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps," dated June 2003.
Hetherington Engineering, Inc., "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Building 4
Addition, 1165 Harbor View Lane, Carlsbad, California", dated July 17, 1990
(ProjectNo. 551.1).
ICBO, "2001 California Building Code", dated November 1, 2002.
California Division of Mines and Geology, "Guidelines for Evaluating and
Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California", Special Publication 117, dated 1997. 1
Project No. 5375.1
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
Log No. 9699
'4 -APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF PROPOSED SECOND STORY ADDITION
EXISTING RESIDENCE
......... . . . . . . . . . . .
HA-1
)y&0
4.4A
0 2
0 10 20 30 40
j HA-1 Je APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HAND-AUGER BORING
PLOT PLAN
1165 Harbor View Lane -HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 5375.1 FIGURE NO., 2
-DRILLING COMPANY: HEI RIG: Hand Auger DATE: 12/05/05
BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DRIVE WEIGHT: DROP: ELEVATION: t,
~q C14 P 2: 0 < 2
E~
U) 14
U~ U) < M BORING'NO. HA-1 z z D z ~4 - U U
E-1
C14 0
44 co E. 1~ (n
0.0 co
04 0 U 0 U) SOIL DESCRIPTION
SM FILL: Dark brown silty fine sand, very moist, loose
SM TERRACE DEPOSITS: Orange to red brown silty fine sand,
moist, medium dense to dense; upper 12 inches weathered to
slightly clayey fine sand, very moist, loose
Total depth 3 feet
No water or caving
20-07
25.0
BORING LOG
1165 Harbor View Lane
-.1-11ETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California
GEOTEC HNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 5375.1 FIGURE NO. 3
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
T
EXPANSION INDEX
(ASTM: D 4829)
Sample Initial Compacted Final Expansion Expansion
Location Moisture Dry Moisture Index Potential.
Density
(pef)
HA-1 Om 12" 8.0 109.4 18.7 22 Low
HA- I @ , 16-24" 9.6 116.4 17.0 23 Low
HA-1 @ 24-34" 10.6 105.9 20.2 3 9 Low
SULFATE TESTRESULTS
(EPA 9038)
Sample Location Soluble Sulfate in Soil
HA-1 @ 0 —12" 0.00827
HA-1 @ 16-24" 0.00670
HA-1 (a) ,24-36" 0.00998
Figure 4
Project No. 5375.1
Log No. 9699
11&5
IL 2 2 0 0
—Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling
Square Feet of Living Area in SDU'
Net Square Feet New Area L,A
I 1 0 U
uare Feet Floor Area
Date:
J
CitV of Carlsbad
Building Department'
CERTIFICATE OF COMIPLLANCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
~..-'Th is f8rm must'be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior,to issuing a bui,lding permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
P~oject Name -Z- - I ~ f
Buildi6g Permit
Pl~n -Check Number:
ct P, roje Address:
Project Applicant
(Owne r N a m e):
Project Description:
._~-Buildih T' g ype,
Re's'idential:-
Second Dwelling Unit:
Residential Additions:
1.Commercial/Industrial:
City'Certification of
Ac
,<arlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District
6225 El Camino Real 215 Mata Way
2~1
arlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649)
Uontact: Nancy DoIce ~By Appt. 0niy2
Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District
10 1 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 7 10 Encinitas Blvd.
Encifiitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491)
ert'ifi cation of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty o' f perjury that (1) the
q information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owners knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended
certification-of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
'footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and
that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner.
Signature: Date:
1635 Faraday Avenue o Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 o (760) 602-2700 J~ev'ise'd 4/20/00 Building Counter e (760) 602-2719 e FAX (760) 602-8558 R.~-
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The.-undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that
1.the'a'plicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school 11 P
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
~-DISTkICT OFFICIAL
T fLE' f
cftsw UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
....NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 EL CAMINO REAL
r-ARLSU% CA MC09
DATE.
PH,ONE-NUMBER
-7 LOO - 503('0
R:evised4/20/00.-:.
CB060383 1165 HARBOR VIEW LN CBAD
DONEZ RES-805 SF 2ND STORY ADD
770 SF DECKS
RESDNTL . RAID
Lot#: DONEZ FRANK&NAVARRO-DONEZ C
7'~
BUILDING . if
aIq0 ca 1'7 PLANNING
all) fa ENGINEERING
APPRIFORM
HEALTH DEPT
;-,- z;-6~ HAZf.4AT / AIR QUAL
OTHER SEWER DISTIR
TO FROM k- APPLICANT APPLICANT
SCHOOLIFOR -7 IM
CFDFORM
L P E A M WORKSHEET
BLDG FEES COMPLETE
PLAN CORR
ENG CORR
E IL CORR SG
FIRE CORR
b.J
cl- u z4j
jt
z X
~601