Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
125 CHINQUAPIN AVE; ; CB991565; Permit
10-04-2007 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB991565 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation:. Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title:" 125 CHINQUAPIN AV CBAD RESDNTL 2060700400 $302,362.00. 6 1 3 THE PALISADES SFD 3560 SF, GARAGE'454 SF Sub Type: SFD Lot#: 2 Construction Type: VN Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Bathrooms: 4 Applicant: MACIELAL 2020 ONE CLOUMBIA ALISOVIEJOCA 92656 949-362-9700 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check*: EXPIRED 04/23/1999 JM Owner: Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'll Pot. Water Con..Fee. Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,331.58 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $865.53 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $30.24 PFF (3105540) $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00 ' Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee ?? Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee $0.00 . Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $6,742.35 Total Fees: $6,742.35 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$6,742.35 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3,32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. •. ' .... You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your.right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity' • changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given.a NOTICE similar to this, or aS'to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ON. PLAN CHECK NO EST. VAL. 3&/52T Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By ' Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units , •Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use' Description of Work 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from ai A( # of Bedrooms;# of Bathrooms J3H State/Zip TelephoneName Address 3. APPLICANT Q Contractor Q Agent for Contractor ^Towner City Agent for Owner Fax* Name , v 4. PROBERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone # Name 5. CONTRACTOR - Address City State/Zip Telephone # COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law .[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031 .5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the .applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). f £ Name State License # Address License Class City I ' State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # •MV11 Designer Name State License ff 6. Address 1 City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: l~| I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 30""^ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: , , Insurance Company C-&[ C^T^M? Policy No. W ^ "7 ^7 //£^"7T<£ Expiration Date '__ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) ' n CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, ;l shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. . WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE _ [ _ ; _ _ DATE _ 7, OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: FT I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). C] I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). l~| I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1 . I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. CD YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): _ ' 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _ _ . _ . _ , PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? F_D YES FJ NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? F~l YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8, CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME &£*M^&\ Jy^fHC LENDER'S ADDRESS ; • . •97 APPUCANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3'stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the wo/k is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In Partnership With government for 'Bu.ikfinjj Safety DATE: OCTOBER 19. 2001 D APfHjCANT JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD , a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1565 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 125 CHINGUAPIN AVE. PROJECT NAME: THE PALISADES . The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: | | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Eisgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: PLANS DISCARDED AT CITY'S REQUEST. . By: KR • Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA Q CM D EJ D PC trnsmtl.dot ' * 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 •*• San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad (pg. 2) September 14, 2001 Please indicate those plans and related documents that can be discarded by Esgil Corporation. Plan Check # I Address Retain the Plans Discard the Plans Return to City 99-1565/125 Chinguapin Ave /X The Palisades 99-1566 /129 Chinguapin Ave The Palisades 99-1578/5804 Van Allen Way f' ! ^ ;|'''"'' V per 99-251/The Island ©Carlsbad - '^ 99-1596/823 Daphne Ct per 99-15 3 / Wagner Residence 99-1631 / 2605 Carlsbad Blvd Army Navy Academy 99-1671/2535 AbedulSt Abedul Street Residence 99-1776 r&bidul Sliest itaMeaee • J>\ Carlsbad Airport Center 99-1950 / 2200 Faraday Ave Nellcorpuritan Bennett 99-2368 / 6933 Mimosa Dr Kunin Residence 99-2855 / 5302 Don Miguel Dr „>'-;*" Hometown Homes ^ r^ 99-3004 / 5960 Pascal Ct Callaway Golf 99-3143 / 6738 Luciemaga PI Jungman Residence 99-3305 II866 Sypglass Ct Dematteo Residence EsGil Corporation In TartnersHip with government for CBuifcfinj Safety DATE: May 04, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1565 ., SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 125 Chinquapin Avenue PROJECT NAME: Palisades- JURIS, PLAN REVIEWER a FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [X The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. - . IXl The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: Bird Designs One Columbia, Ste. #2000, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Esgil Corporation O MB D EJ PC Enclosures: 04/26/99 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 *• Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1565 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 125 Chinquapin Avenue FLOOR AREA: 3560-R3 454-U1 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 04/23/99 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: May 04, 1999 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: -30' DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 04/26/99 PLAN REVIEWER: Tony Embuido FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform ;Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. ; Present California law mandates that residential construction complies with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective .12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) rSforw.dot Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: •i 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760)438-1161. City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed arid sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). • FIRE PROTECTION 3. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) On each story. See 1st floor plan. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of • separate tools. Section 310.4. Note as part of the plans. Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 5. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. 6. Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3' from any opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section 1203.3. 7. Dimension on the plan's 30" clear width for water closet compartments. Section 2904. See bathrooms #2 and #4. 8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Specify tempered glass on floor plans. a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. b) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. • STAIRWAYS AND RAILINGS 9. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall have a height of 36". b) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. c) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 10. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3, 1006.15 and 1006.2. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. 11. Handrails: a) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. : b) All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 1006.9. Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 12. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches or more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. • ROOFING/DECKING 13. Specify on the plans the following information for the deck materials, per Section 106.3.3: See balcony at 2nd floor plan. a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) IGBO approval number, or equal. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 14. The soil's engineer recommended that he review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 15. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). • FRAMING 16. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708: a) In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal; : b) At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces :• such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c) In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; . d) At openings between attic spaces and chimney chases for factory-built chimneys. Carlsbad 99-1565 May O4, 1999 17. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. a) City of Carlsbad does not allow deferred submittal. b) Placement plans must be made part of the plans and stamped & "wet" signed by engineer of record. 18. Show clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure nonbearing condition between supports as designed). 19. Per UBC Section 2343.6, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." 20. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. (See comments at end {miscellaneous}.) 21. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to interior bearing shear walls. Section 2314. See framing plans on sheet A-21. 22. Detail truss layout for 30" x 30" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic and detail 30" x 30" clearance through truss webs. See floor plan keynote #22. 23. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least 8" above exposed ground unless the columns or posts, which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2317.5. See detail 7/SD1. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 24. Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than the furnace or furnaces being installed. UMC Section 315.1. 25. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more; than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 319.4, UMC. 26. Note on plan: Gas vents and noncombustible piping in walls, passing through three floors or less, shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 711.3. Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 27. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Sections 319.6 and 320.1, UMC. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 28. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with 1993 NEC Art. 210-52(a). 29. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with 1993 NEC Art. , 210-52(h), which reads as follows: For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be required. 30. Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with 1993 NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms and within 6 feet of a kitchen sink. See master bathroom and kitchen areas. • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 31. Show water heater size and type location on floor plan. UPC, Section 501.0. 32. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. 33. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0. 34. Provide a note on the plans: In showers and tub-shower combinations, control valves must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. Section 410.7. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 35. The regulations require a properly signed Form CF-1R. See T-24 sheet. 36. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. See bathroom notes on sheet GN-3. 37. Provide a note on the plans stating; "All new glazing (fenestration's) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." 38. "Mandatory Measures Checklist" must be made a part of the plans. Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 CARLSBAD S.F.D. SUPPLEMENT 39. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note that two roof jacks must be installed where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south-facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 40. Note that two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). 41. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). 42. City Ordinance 9792 requires 2 parking spaces/unit with clear area of 20' x 20', i.e. no washing machines, etc. Show compliance and dimensions on garage plan. • MISCELLANEOUS 43. Provide concrete level landing to exterior side door at garage. 44. Correct detail sheet for details shown on foundation plan. It should be SD1 in . lieu of SD2. 45. Provide design calc's. and show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x 4 & 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2x4 max. 14', 2x6 max. 20'. Table 23-I-R-3. 46. Provide design calc's. and details of girder trusses and show how they are supported. See roof-framing plan on sheet A-21. 47. Provide design calc's. and show drag ties (struts) to shear resisting elements and connection details on framing plans. See sheet A-21. 48. How will MST37 for 8' shear panel be transferred below along grid line [B]? See entry below and provide detail connections. 49. Correct symbol of shear wall schedule along grid line [B] for 5' panel per design calc's. See sheet A-21. 50. Specify on framing plan, the vertical holdowns per design calc's. along grid line [C]and[D]. 51.. Correct size of steel columns used per design & framing plan on detail 11/SD1. Carlsbad 99-1565 May 04, 1999 52. Show size of continuous footings on foundation plan per design calc's. 53. Show pad footing and details at garage front per design calc's. 54. Provide complete additional structural details on the plans with cross referencing as needed to show the structural framing will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. 55. Clearly cross-reference ajl details on foundation and framing plans, sections, elevations, etc. 56. Engineer of record to verify consistency of design calc's. with foundation and framing plans & details. 57. Indicate distance from property lines to the proposed building. Section 106.3.3. Additional corrections may follow depending on distance to side yards. See site plan. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 99-1565 May O4, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1565 PREPARED BY: Tony Embuido DATE: May 04, 1999 BUILDING ADDRESS: 125 Chinquapin Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) •. '• VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) 302,362 (PER CITY) D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee fj Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1331.58 C] 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Q Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 865.52 Type of Review: jffi Complete Review f_J Structural Only -f~| Hourly Q| Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $173.11* Comments: 13% of Building Permit Fee. See PC #99-1563 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad ~ ^ ^•^^••••^•^•^MJ^V^^H^HHM^^HBBHEngineering Department BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.:DATE: BUILDING Al PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ote£~O:?n- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. [A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: EST. VALUE: DENIAL Please see\ the. attached report of deficiencies marked withJ&fMake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date:By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: By:Date: D ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application U Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4510 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 , CA 92009-^576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST oN Q SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: (K) North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures Existing Street Improvements 2. Show on site plan: Property Lines Easements Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths i Drainage Patterns . 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number r} Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION X " J DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. ffccrw cfe 4^>g TSs-Qc^-g a or- Q Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: H:WVORD\DOCSCHKLST\Bullding Planctieck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST iSTV DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ _,; pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 y* x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:Date: X IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are; not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by:Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ ' so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buildins PlandlH* Cklst BP0001 Forni JJ.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST I st/ ond/ ord/ Q • Q Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: ; Date: Q Q Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. Q Q 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). ' Q Q 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: Q Q Q 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required esven if a grading permit is not required.) Q Q Q ' 7d.No Grading Permit required. Q Q Q 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: -' BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiMingPlancheckCklstBP0001FomiJJ.doc ., ord/ Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: Q 11.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Q 12. ETRequired fees are attached T&WA. Ross t-o/U la*- Q No fees required C^CJE. ?i^ 7$ 13. Additional Comments: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuikJino Plancheck Cklsl BP0001 Forni JJ.doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET timate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address:A**. Bldg. Permit No. Prepared by:/9=)Date:Checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: -Cp/Q Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units:__ APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^fft> Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHINIFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: X NO. UNITS:= $_ 0^2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: /X FEE/ADT: fi> "?O jfijffc TRANSPORTATION ADT'S X $10 f$3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS: p4^TACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 X FEE/ADT: ZONE: / X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: = $ $ = $ tV DIST. #3 -$ / 70 f ) V 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. EDU's: / j^tEFlT AREA: EDU's: ftf-B. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) d/7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ACRES: X DRAINAGE X B X FEE/EDU:/?bSy BASIN: FEE/EDU: HIGH tX/LOW FEE/AC: - $ = $ = $ -$ / j& C~* (*S/ C2*^ f <grs / TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCSVMISFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 4/29/99 -v \ d> ^J (TJ TO O D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: - / Van Lvnch Address Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4447 Type of Project & Use:_ Zoning: j^~^ General Plan: Net Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: DU/AC CFD (ir^t) #_ Circle One .Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ^- ) D D a Legend:Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: //-fVf g> Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES X NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES A" NO TYPE /l>u J OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Q Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES X NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES >C NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): • Coastal Permit Determination ForrrValready completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. ,. \,J v - •!' Coastal Permit Determination Log #: •*...:. , '• :•, /—•'. •-,' - JV , (, Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. O. 0 HZ] DO Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES yf NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.L, __ fur* Data'.Entry Completed? YES j<_ NO /<^ .\(A/P/Ds, Activity'Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. .nO 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. PI PI' - ! ! - ' O D Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Accessory structure Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation 3. Lot Coverage: r Required 5~ Required f ' Required -—• — ~ Required £/O' setbacks: Required , ,.\ Required , / Required ^/A Required / /"+" : Required Required ^bOto^-. ^ 'Shown J Shown r' Shown - — Shoj/vn V-~— ___-^ Shown , .Shown / Shown / Shown / Shown / Shown ^— ^6 4. Height:Required Shown ^fi)o o 5. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Additional Comments^l <*J Z— f-f-t- Shown <L Shown ; **> OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE OCHOA DESIGNS 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 (841-0643) "7*- PROJECT, i 5Stai-CA CARLSBAD, CA. PLANS CRITERIA: MATERIALS: UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1994 EXCEPT AS NOTED OTHERWISE CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK REINFORCED STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING STRUCTURAL PIPE PLYWOOD SHEATHING GLUE LM BEAMS LUMBER SOIL PRESSURE DESIGN REFERENCES: CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL LUMBER ALL WOOD DOUGLAS FIR LARCH: Ignacio G. Ochoa, P.E. RCE335217 Exp. 9/30/99 !^^^^ 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS ASSUME 1000 PSF GRADE N, LT WT UNITS (ASTM C-90) PER ASTM C-62, MW GRADE 20,000 PSI (ASTM A-615 GRADE 40) 24,000 PSI (ASTM A-36, COMPACT) AISC 1997 ED. ELECT ARC PROCESSBY CERTIFIED WELDERS 35000 PSI (ASTM A-53) GRADE B DOUGLAS FIR, STRUG 1, INTR..P.S. 1-76 2400 PSI (D.F. COMB F24) GRADE MARKED DF PER WCLB GRDG RULE 16 2000 PSF (SOILS REPORT) ACI DESIGN HANDBOOK CONG MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CMA MANUAL OF STEEL CONST. AISC. WOOD STRUCT DESIGN DATA, NLMA No. 2 No. 1 GLB Fv 95PSI 85PSI 165 PSI Fb 875 PSI 1350 P[SI 2400 PSI E(X1000000) 1.6 PSI 1.6 PSI 1.8 PSI * 2. 5 5 2, 0 i?.o fsp LL TL PL- (2.0 Z. c - 4ft. 0 TL -= 72.0 OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 ' RCE#35217 OCHO4 DESIGNS - floo*&T Hi H3 HO Hi"*- ft*- Hz /I/O Vh H\- ityi n ^R,-- 8.1 Hit tilO I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 is OCHOA DESIGNS I II •* £-0 4 3ft. •4\1 - 7. la.= S-o = -2.0611. I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 4x8 *- OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Art V\'\2> 320 ii OCHOA DESIGNS ft . St,- •Yt' K\- m vu r- HH ft -X *' " 41 = -75 vi- I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 * V OCHOA DESIGNS ^ t'-t" VV - /0,-L H- ^ 5*70 * - 72,6 * 2.703 I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 •* JUfzV Sfc* * 8 (4*3 so *>•*> *J-o - 8.4 OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 OCHOA DESIGNS i Tof 1018?5/5 z-i o (30)8(7^1) =7. I'-O"£.1 I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 C8) vj |lO<JL 4--0 OCHO/l DESIGNS WALL © V- f o<45 - 7725 D 30 to I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 •* 4U •213 OCHOA DESIGNS v^0=^ //O = 12. 3 •ft. 7^0 VI ML © V/^L (5) I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 • I 72. ^CV Vj(|oi To <a VM|-A OCHOA DESIGNS \ I* I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 T ^ 6 vi 101 OCHOA DESIGNS fuf ^ (5) * M 7X7 =22. (^ > 8.13 78-«/ '/*. ' I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 I* -/o 44 •I „ " OCHOA DESIGNS f j *- f *•<• ir- = 2 I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 X W/ SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE (1994 UBC) Z=572 FOX DOUG-FIR AND Z=478 FOR HEM-FIR K (260 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 6" E.N., 12" F.N. 16D @ 6" (OR 20D @ 8") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ 2'-10" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ 2'-5" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ l'-8" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE. L (380 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 4" E.N., 12" F.N. 16D @ 4" (OR 20D @ 5") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ 2'-0" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ l'-8" FOR HEM-FIR). SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ l'-2" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE. M (49Q-#/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL-EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 3" E.N., 12" F.N. 16D @ 3" (OR 20D @ 4") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ l'-6" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ l'-3" for HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 11" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE. N (550 #/FT) 3/8" STRUCT. 1 PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 3" E.N., 12" F.N. 16D @ 3" (OR 20D @ 4") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ l'-4" FOR DOUG-FIR (@ l'-2" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 9" ROOF RARER TO TOP PLATE. P (640 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 2" E.N., 12" F.N. TO 3X FRAMING MEMBERS. 16D @ 2.5" (OR 20D @ 3.5") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ l'-2" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ I'-O" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 8" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE. Q (760 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 4" E.N., @ 12" F.N. TO 3X FRAMING MEMBERS @ JOINT. 16D @ 2" (OR 20D @ 3") SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS @ 1-0" FOR DOUG-FIR (@ 10" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 7" ROOF RARER TO TOP PLATE. R (980 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 3" E.N., 12" F.N. TO 3X FRAMING MEMBERS @ JOINT. 1/2" A.B. @ 9" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ 7" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 5" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE. S (1280 #/FT) 3/8" CDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLOCK ALL EDGES) WITH 8D COMMON NAILS @ 2" E.N., 12" F.N. TO 3X FRAMING MEMBERS @ JOINT. 1/2" A.B. @ 7" FOR DOUG-FIR (OR @ 6" FOR HEM-FIR) SOLE PLATE TO CONCRETE. A-35 @ 4" ROOF RAFTER TO TOP PLATE: ALL ORIENTATIONSCERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential Page 1 Project Title: Project Address: \ Building Title: Document Author: Telephone: THE PALISADES PARCEL 2 CARLSBAD, CA PLAN 3B AL MACIEL 949/ 362 9700 Compliance Method: CALRES2 Version 1.31 Run: 558 15-Apr-99 PALISADES-PLAN3B Building Permit # Plan Check / Date Field Check / Date Climate Zone: GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area: Building Type: Building Front Orientation: Number of Dwelling Units: Floor Construction Type: 3560 ft2 SFD Single Family Detached 304 deg (West) 1.00 Slab on grade BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component Insul Type R-value Door Wall Wall Floor Floor Ceiling Slab Perimeter Slab Perimeter Slab Perimeter Slab Perimeter 0 13 13 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 Assembly U-value 0.330 0.088 0.088 0.722 0.295 0.047 0.900 0.550 0.720 0.500 Location/Comments Unconditioned Outside Unconditioned Grade Grade Outside Outside Unconditioned Outside Unconditioned FENESTRATION Orientation Window Window Window Window Window Window Window Window Window Window Window West West West South South East East North North North North Area (ft2) 13 15 28 79 66 152 100 130 16 145 24 .4 .0 .0 .0 .0 .3 .0 .0 .0 .8 .0 U- value Panes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 .500 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Interior Shading None None None None None None None None None None None Exterior Shading None None None None None None None None None None None Overhang and Fins Overhang OH+Fins OH+Fins Overhang None Overhang OH+Fins Overhang OH+Fins None OH+Fins Frame Type Vinyl Vinyl Wood Vinyl Vinyl Vinyl Vinyl Vinyl Vinyl Vinyl Wood Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Southland Communities Development Chinquapin Avenue and Carlsbad Avenue Carlsbad, California Project Number 8017-99 April 2, 1999 m) NorCal Engineering ^^I/ \ -t NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Southland Communties, Inc. 1 Columbia, Suite 2020 Aliso Viejo, California 92656-1473 Attn.: Mr.J.D. Ostic RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residential Development - Located at Chinquapin Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Ostic: Pursuant to your request, this firm has performed a Geotechnical Investigation for the above referenced project in accordance with your authorization of proposal dated March 4, 1999. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions of the subject site and to provide recommendations for the proposed project. This geotechnical engineering report presents the finding of our study along with conclusions and recommendations for development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERS Keith D. Tucker | £ / No. 841 \ ^\| Scott D. Spensiero Project Engineer [uj | _„___ 1,/ai/,vl ) m|| Project Manager R.G.E. 841 April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 2 Project Description The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering design parameters for evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed development. It is proposed to construct a total of six single family residences on two lots located along Chinquapin Avenue. Other improvements will comprise of concrete and asphalt pavement areas, including the street cul-de-sac and landscaping. Site Description The subject project is situated within a residential tract within the 100 'block of i Chinquapin Avenue, immediately east of Carlsbad Boulevard and west of Garfield Street ]i in the City of Carlsbad. The project consists of two undeveloped sites along both sides of the referenced street and are currently covered with a moderate vegetation growth consisting of natural gra project site is attached. consisting of natural grasses and weeds. A vicinity map which shows the location of the The easternmost lot is located north of Chinquapin Avenue and is rectangular shaped elongated in a north to south direction. The site is relatively level with topography descending gradually from rear to front on the order of a few feet. The property is bordered by wood fencing and a masonry wall along a majority of the property perimeter. The westernmost site is situated along the south terminus of Chinquapin Avenue and is I! perched along the coastal bluff overlying the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the south. This rectangular shaped site elongated in a east to west direction is elevated approximately I 40 to 50 feet above mean sea level (msl) descending overall with an inclination of about /.• 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). A 15 feet high riprap wall of large granite boulders currently i, lines the toe of the bluff along the shoreline of the lagoon. The lot also descends near the west property line toward Carlsbad Avenue on the order of about 15 feet in height at a gradient of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 3 Field Investigation The investigation consisted of the placement of two (2) subsurface borings by a truckmounted hollow stem auger to a depth of 50 feet and five (5) subsurface trenches by a backhoe to maximum depth of 15 feet placed strategically in proposed areas of development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field'engineer with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. The exploratory excavations revealed the existing earth materials to consist of a fill and ji native soil. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A. These soils are described as follows: Fill: A fill soil to a depth of 1 to 11/2 feet was encountered consisting predominately of a brown, fine to medium grained, slightly siltyi SAND which was noted generally to be loose and damp. These soils were noted to contain some small gravel. Terrace Deposit: An undisturbed terrace material was encountered directly beneath the upper fill soils consisting predominately of a brown to red brown, fine to medium grained, slightly silty SAND which were noted to be dense and moist. Deeper soils consisted of dense to very dense sands to silty sands. The overall engineering characteristics of the earth material were relatively uniform with each boring. Groundwater was encountered at a depth 49 feet below ground surface in Boring B-1 and no caving occurred to the depths of our excavations. Laboratory Tests ; Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in- place moisture/densities. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 4 These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for expansion index tests, maximum density tests, atterberg limits and sulfate tests. All test results are included in Appendix B, unless noted otherwise. A. The field moisture content (ASTM:D 2216) and the dry density qf the ring samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log of I excavations.i1 ji B. Sieve analyses (ASTM: D422-63) and the percent by weight ofjjsoil finer I than the No. 200 sieve (ASTM: 1140) were performed on selected soil samples. These results are shown later within the body of this report. C. Maximum density tests (ASTM: D-1557-78) were performed on typical i samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table I. D. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code i Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper f soils to determine the expansive characteristics. Results of these tests are provided on Table II. I! E. Determination of Atterberg limits (ASTM: D 4318-84) consisting of liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils were performed on representative samples. Results are shown on Table III F. Soluble sulfate tests in accordance with EPA Method 9038 were » performed on representative soils samples. Results are provided in Table IV. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 5 G. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and disturbed samples of the subsurface soils. The test is performed under saturated conditions at loads of 500 Ibs./sq.ft, 1,000 Ibs./sq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. with results shown on Plate A. H. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undisturbed I; samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the ij samples at a surcharge of one KSF and the settlement curves are plotted on Plate B. ! Conclusions and Recommendations Based upon our evaluations, the proposed development is acceptable! from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. By following the recommendations and guidelines set forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements under the anticipated design loadings and conditions. The proposed development shall meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse 'effect on existing adjacent structures. It is recommended that site inspections be performed by a representative of this firm during all grading and construction of the development to verify the findings and recommendations documented in this report. The following sections present a discussion of geotechnical related requirements for specific design recommendations of different aspects of the project. Seismicity Evaluation There are no known active or potentially active faults trending toward or through the site. The proposed development lies outside of any Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone and the potential for damage due to direct fault rupture is considered very remote. The site is located in an area of high regional seismicity and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.40 may occur from a Magnitude 6.3 earthquake along the Rose Canyon fault zone, which is located approximately 5 miles away. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 PageG Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The following table provides information on nearby major active faults along with peak horizontal ground accelerations. Estimated Maximum Probable Ground Motion Parameters Fault Approximate Distance Maximum Probable Peak Horizontal Zone From Site (Miles) Magnitude (Richter) Acceleration (g) ii Rose Canyon 5 NW 6.3 0.40 Coronado Bank 20 SW 6.8 0.23 Elsinore 23 NE 6.8 0.19 San Andreas 73 NE 8.2 0.10 CDMG Open File Reports 92-03 and 96-08 The following earthquake design parameters are based upon the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) for a Seismic Zone 4 with a Z factor of 0.40 and a Soil Profile Type of So, based on a stiff soil profile. !i Earthquake Fault Rose Canyon Coronado Bank ii 1. Distance from Site 8km 32km 2. Seismic Source Type B B • 3. Seismic Coefficient = Ca (0.44) Na (0.44)::Na 4. Seismic Coefficient = Cv (0.64) Nv (0.64);Nv 5. Near-Source Factor Na 1.0 1.0 6. Near-Source Factor Nv 1.2 1.0 Liquefaction Potential The site is expected to experience ground shaking and earthquake activity that is typical of Southern California area. It is during severe ground shaking that loose, granular soils below the groundwater table can liquefy. A review of the exploratory boring log and the laboratory test results on selected soil samples obtained indicate the following soil classifications, field blowcounts and amounts of fines passing through the No. 200 sieve. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Page 7 Location Classification B-1 @ 5' B-1 @ 10' B-1 @ 15' B-1 @ 20' B-1 @ 25' B-1 @ 30' B-1 @ 35' B-1 @ 40' B-1 @ 45' B-1 @ 50' SM SM SM SW SW SM SM SW SW SM Project Number 8017-99 Exploratory Borinq B-1 Field Blowcounts (blows/ft) 15 17 16 14 32 31 >50 >50 >50 >50 Relative Density Amount Passing No. 200 Sieve (%} i! Dense 16 Dense 1 1 Dense 5 Medium Dense 6 Dense Dense Very Dense Very Dense Very Dense Very Dense • Groundwater encountered at a depth of 49 feet below 5 . 12 17 12 i! 12} ground surface. Exploratory Boring B-2 • Location B-1 @ 5' B-1 @ 10' B-1 @ 15' B-1 @ 20' B-1 @ 25' B-1 @ 30' B-1 @ 35' B-1 @40' B-1 @ 45' B-1 @ 50' Classification SM SM SM SW SW SM SM SW SW SM Field Blowcounts (blows/ft) 15 16 17 28 25 41 31 33 >50 >50 Relative Density Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Very Dense Very Dense Amount (passing No. 200 Sieve f%) 16 22! 7 9 11 8 12: 15 15! No groundwater encountered to the depth of our boring. Our analysis indicates the potential for liquefaction at this site is considered |to be low due to the deep groundwater level and dense to very dense sands below a depth of 25 feet. Seismic induced settlements should be less than" one inch and will occur rather uniformly across the site with nominal differential settlements. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 8 Site Stability Evaluation The existing descending slopes lie at a 2 to 1 or flatter gradient with a maximum height of 40 feet, beyond the south property line. These silty sands are generally dense to very dense with adequate safety factors greater than 1.5, per latest Uniform Building Code (UBC) Standards. Site Grading Recommendations Any vegetation or demolition debris shall be removed and hauled from proposed grading areas prior to the start of grading operations. Any removed soils may be reutilized as compacted fill once any deleterious material or oversized materials (in excess of eight inches) is removed. All grading operations shall be performed in accordance' with the attached "Specifications for Compacted Fill Operations". The upper disturbed/fill soils (upper 1 to 11/2 feet) shall be removed to expose native soils, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard prior to placement of any additional compacted fill soils, foundations and concrete slabs. This fill shall extend a minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of vertical overexcavation, whichever is greater, beyond the outside edge of the perimeter foundation. Temporary Excavations Temporary unsurcharged excavations in the existing site materials less than 4;feet high I may be made at a vertical gradient unless cohesionless soils are encountered. ' |; Temporary unsurcharged excavations from 4 to 8 feet high may be trimmed at a 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient. In areas where soils with little or no binder are j! encountered, where adverse geological conditions are exposed, or where excavations are adjacent to existing structures, shoring, slot-cutting, or flatter excavations may be required. The temporary cut slope gradients given do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 9 All excavations shall be made in accordance with the requirements of CAL-OSHA and other public agencies having jurisdiction. Care should be taken to provide or maintain adequate lateral support for all adjacent improvements and structures at all times during the grading operations and construction phase. Foundation Design All foundations may be designed utilizing a safe bearing capacity of 2,000 psf for an embedded depth of 18 and 24 inches into approved compacted fill soils or competent native soils for two and three story structures, respectively. The bearing value may be increased by 500 psf for each additional foot of depth in excess of the 18 inch minimum i! depth, up to a maximum of 3,000 psf. A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. Lateral Resistance The following values may be utilized in resisting lateral loads imposed on the structure. Requirements of the current Uniform Building Code should be adhered to when the coefficient of friction and passive pressures are combined: : Coefficient of Friction - 0.40 ! Equivalent Passive Fluid Pressure = 250 Ib./cu.ft. Maximum Passive Pressure = 2,500 Ibs./sq.ft. ii The passive pressure recommendations are valid only for compacted fill soils and/or il competent native soils. Settlement Analysis Resultant pressure curves for the consolidation tests are shown on Plate B. Computations utilizing these curves and the recommended safe bearing capacities 'i reveal that the foundations will experience settlements on the order of 3/4 inch and differential settlements of less than 1/4 inch. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 10 Retaining Wall Design Parameters Active earth pressures against retaining walls will be equal to the pressures developed by the following fluid densities. These values are for granular free draining backfill material placed adjacent to the walls at various ground slopes above the walls. Surface Slope of Retained Materials Equivalent Fluid (Horizontal to Vertical) Density (Ib./cu.ft.) Level 30 5to1 35 4to1 38 3to1 40 2 to 1 45 Any applicable short-term construction surcharges and seismic forces should be added to the above lateral pressure values. A backfill zone of non-expansive material shall consist of a wedge beginning a minimum of one horizontal foot from the base of the wall extending upward at an inclination no less than 1/4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). All walls shall be waterproofed as needed and protected from hydrostatic pressure by a reliable permanent subdrain system. Slab Recommendations All concrete slabs shall be a minimum of four inches in thickness and placed on approved subgrade soils. A vapor barrier sandwiched between four inches of select sand shall be utilized beneath floor slabs which would be sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab areas to receive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. • Corrosion Design Criteria Representative samples of the surficial soils, typical of the subgrade soils expected to be encountered within foundation excavations were tested for sulfate concentration. According to the '1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table 19-A-3 - Requirements for Concrete Exposed to Sulfate-Containing Solutions', these contents revealed negligible levels of sulfate exposure. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 11 Therefore, a Type II cement according to latest UBC specifications may be utilized for building foundations at this time. Additional sulfate tests shall be performed at the completion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with the recommendations stated in this design. Sulfate test results may be found on the attached Table IV. Limitations The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during construction phase. Any unusual conditions which may be encountered in the course of the project development may require the need for additional study and revised recommendations. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project. This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the review of the controlling authorities for the project. A preconstruction conference should be held between the developer, general contractor, grading contractor, city inspector, architect, and geotechnical engineer to clarify any questions relating to the grading operations and subsequent construction. Our representative should be present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such recommendations are complied within the field. This geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the Southern California area. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 12 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILL Preparation Any existing low density soils and/or saturated soils shall be removed to competent natural soil under the inspection of the Soils Engineering Firm. After the exposed surface has been cleansed of debris and/or vegetation, it shall be scarified until it is uniform in consistency, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78). Material For Fill The on-site soils or approved import soils may be utilized for the compacted fill provided they are free of any deleterious materials and shall not contain any rocks, brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete or other hard materials greater than eight inches in maximum dimensions. Any import soil must be approved by the Soils Engineering firm a minimum of 24 hours prior to importation of site. Placement of Compacted Fill Soils The approved fill soils shall be placed in layers not in excess of six inches in thickness. Each lift shall be uniform in thickness and thoroughly blended. The fill soils shall be brought to within 15% of the optimum moisture content, unless otherwise specified by the Soils Engineering firm. Each lift shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78) and approved prior to the placement of the next layer of soil. Compaction tests shall be obtained at the discretion of the Soils Engineering firm but at a minimum of one test for every 500 cubic yards placed and/or for every two vertical feet of compacted fill placed. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 13 The minimum relative compaction shall be obtained in accordance with accepted methods in the construction industry. The final grade of the structural areas shall be in a dense and smooth condition prior to placement of slabs-on-grade or pavement. No fill soils shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the grading is interrupted by heavy rains, compaction operations shall not be resumed until approved by the Soils Engineering firm. Grading Observations The controlling governmental agencies should be notified prior to commencement of any grading operations. This firm recommends that the grading operations be conducted under the observation of a Soils Engineering firm as deemed necessary. A 24 hour notice must be provided to this firm prior to the time of our initial inspection. Observation shall include the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all unsuitable materials have been properly removed; approval of the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished grade and designate areas of overexcavation; and performance of field compaction tests to determine relative compaction achieved during fill placement. In addition, all foundation excavations shall be observed by the Soils Engineering firm to confirm that appropriate bearing materials are present at the design grades and recommend any modifications to construct footings. NorCal Engineering •Sfcs- T-4 tf :_ u -S iI' fr «I 11NCH-60 FEET Sx» (CMSC)CARLSBAD BOULEVARD^. A'-'- I NorCal Engineering 'SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 8017-99 APRIL 1999 SITE PLAN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FIELD EXPLORATIONS g o LU CO ID£s* u o>o> o»o>en Project Number 8017-99 List of Appendices (in order of appearance) Appendix A - Log of Excavations • Log of Borings B-1 and B-2 • Log of Trenches T-1 to T-5 • Appendix B - Laboratory Tests • Table I - Maximum Dry Density • Table II - Expansion • Table III - Atterberg Limits • Table IV-Sulfate • Plate A - Direct Shear • Plate B - Consolidation Appendix C - Site Stability Evaluation NorCal Engineering Project Number 8017-99 Appendix A NorCal Engineering w '<7.i ffioo>e»P <M 16 11 5 6 5 12 1MOISTURE(X)5.6 6.2 3.4 5.7 4.8 7.2 DRY DENSITY(PCF)1PENETRATION 1RESISTANCE(BtOWS/FOOT)5/7/ 10/8/9 9/8/J 6/7/' 12/14, 3/15/SAMPLE TYPE IB 5 S S S S 18 J 6S II 5- 10- 1S- 20- 25- 30- 9C DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY AmilS ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS SOfllNO AMO AT THE TIME OF MILUNO. SUtSUKFACC CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS * SIMPLIFICATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. ' \ / Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, danp 'i Terrace Deposits SAM) fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense, damp SAND fine to medium grained, light brown to tan, dense, damp intermingled lenses of silty sand « with occasional coarse grained; sand and small gravel -Layer of gravel @ 27' SAND fine grained, silty, grey /brawn moist dense SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, with occasional coarse grained sands, tan, damp, very dense (continued) ll - SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 [jfj Rock Core [D Bulk Sample EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem lAuger QQ Standard Split Spoon (7J Jar Sample 6ROUNDHATER LEVEL: 49' (_Rj Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORINGl B-1 PRCXTJ0CT 8017-99 | DATE ; 17 12 13 12 !• 8.4 8.2 15.2 18.3 !'•Ill 29/50- 50/-/- 40/50- 39/50- — •*SAMPLE TYPE 14"S S 6" S 4" S 40- 45- 55- 60- - 65- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS TH»» IUMMAHV AMUM OMIV AT TH( IOCATIOM Or THIS iCXMNO AND AT THC TIMC Or OMIlLINa MMtUMMCI CONDITIONS MAY OifftK AT OTHBM LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANQE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC FASSAOf Of TIM8. THB DATA WCSENTEO IS A SIMPUflCATIOM Or ACTUAL CONDITION* CMCOUNTCMO. SAND fine to medium grained, with occasional coarse grained sand, tan, damp, very dense SAND fine to coarse grained, slightly silty, light tan, damp to moist, very dense SAND fine to medium grained, silty with occasional coarse grained sands, light tan, moist, very dense » li ' J <u : — SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 (T| Rock Core [§] Bulk S*«ple EQOIPHEHT USED: Hollow Stem Auger (TJ Standard Split Spoon [3] Jar Saaple GROUNDUATER LEVEL: 49' [Rj Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOIl^ AND GEOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING B-1 PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE 16 22 7 9 11 8 MOISTURE<%)6.1 6.4 4.2 3.4 4.0 3.4 DRY DENSITY<PCFIPENETRATIONRESSTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)9/7/5 8/8/5 10/13, 11/13/ 15/18/SAMPLE TYPE IS s s 15 S 12 S BS ii 5- 10- \S- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMAAV APFUES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS 6OfllNO AMD AT THE TIME OF MILLINO. SUtSIMFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE FASSAOE OF TIME. THE OATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. • \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, damp, medium dense to dense with depth SAND fine to medium grained, light brown to tan, dense, damp intermingled lenses of silty sand with occasional coarse grained, sand and small gravel SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty with occasional coarse grained sands, tan, damp, very dense SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, damp to moist, dense (continued) SAMPLE TYPES Qf] Rock Core |HT| Bulk Sanple (T) Standard Split Spoon [j] Jar Sanple 00 Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PRCXTBCT 8017-99 DATE |l - DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem Auger GROUNDHATER LEVEL: None Encountered LOG OF BORING B-2 13 12 15 15 SAW HIHQ[ V)i" 8.7 8.5 9.6 10.7 ORYDENSTYIPCF»•(1 9/1V 1Z/16/ 50/-/- en/ /5U/-/-SAUPLETYPE I7 S 17 S S S • 40- 45- 55- 60- 65- 0 — DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY Ami II ONLY AT THC LOCATION Of THIS IOMNO ANO AT THC TIMC OfOMLLIMO. suiaunrACC CONDITIONS MAY OIPCIR AT OTHIH LOCATIONS ANQ MAY CHANQC AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC MSSAOC Of TIMC. THC DATA PflCSCNTCO IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS CNCOUNTCMO. \ SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, damp to moist, dense SAND fine grained, silty, tan, damp very dense SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, moist, very dense -Slight decrease in moist content i __^^__ -^__ lv IE TYPES Rock Core (T) Bulk Sanple Standard Split Spoon fTj Jar Sanple Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE •!• - DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem Auger 6ROUMDMATER LEVEL: None Encountered LOG OF BORING B-2 MOISTURE<X»2.9 4.4 • 3.1 3.1 DRY DENSITY(PCF)116.6 113.9 112.0 107.4 PENETRATIONRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)1 R/E R R R f g Si 5- - 10- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS rm» SUMMAMV Afmcs ONI.Y AT TNI LOCATION ot THI* IOMINO ANO AT THE TIMC OFOHIUINO. sutiunrACi CONDITIONS MAY oirrcM AT OTHER LOCATIONS ANO MAY CHANGS AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC M4SAOC Of TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with small gravel, upper 18" with small rootlets Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense to very dense, damp SAND fine to medium grained, light brown medium dense, damp t ELEVATIONtFE£T»SAHPLE TYPES WTE DRILLED: 3-24-99 [Tj Flock Core [f] Bulk Savple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe |] Standard Split Spoon [j] Jar Saaple GROUNDWTER LEVEL: None Encountered R] Ring Saaple , NorCal Engineering 1 SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Tnfi op TOENnH rp_1 PROJECT 8017-99 1 DATE MOISTURE1%)6.9 7.2 5.2 2.4 2.9 DRY DENSITY(PCFI112.9 112.4 110.1 106.3 105.4 PENETRATION ]RESISTANCE II BLOWS/FOOT) I? R R R R R £P II - 5- 10- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS TMl WMMAMV AffUf t OW.V AT THt LOCATION Of THIS lOAINfl AMD AT THE TIMt Of OAIILINO. tUtlUKfACI CONDITIONS MAY 0\fH* M OTHCN LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE »ASSAdE W TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with small gravel, upper 18" with small rootlets Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense, moist SAND fine to medium grained, light brown medium dense, damp |i SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3-24-99 [jf) Rock Core |T] Bulk Sanple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe Tj Standard Split Spoon [T) Jar Saaple GROUKDHATER LEVEL: None Encountered OQ Ring Sample :, NorCal Engineering [SOULS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TnR OF ^^^ ^ o PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE MOISTUREt%>5.2 . 6.7 DRY DENSITY(PC?)113.6 114.1 PENETRATIONRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)SAMPLE TYPER R II 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION Of SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY AmiES ONLY AT THE LOCATION Of THIS SOAINQ ANO AT THE TIME Of (MILLING. SUtlURMCI CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS ANO MAY CHANCE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE FASSAOE Of TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with minor root structures to 18" Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense - || SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3_24-99 Qfj Rock Core [Tj Bulk Sanple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe ?J Standard Split Spoon (T) Jar Sanple GROUNDHATER LEVEL: None Encountered 00 Ring Saaple .; NorCal Engineering •SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS rrr ^ TORNrH ^ „ PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE MOISTURE(Xt2.8 6.5 4.5 OHY DENSITYCPCFI113.0 111.4 113.4 108.1 PENETRATIONRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)1 R/B R R R II 5- 10- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION Of THIS SOAINO AND AT THE TIME Of OAILLINO. SUtSIWMCE CONDITIONS MAY DIME* AT OTHEH LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE fASSAOE Or TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTEMEO. \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with root structures Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, red brown, dense, slightly moist with occasional trace of clay content SAND fine to medium grained, light brown, medium dense, moist *ELEVATIONCFEETISAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3_24-99 [C] Rock Core (T) Bulk Saaple EQUIPHEKT USED: Backhoe [T] Standard Split Spoon [TJ Jar Sanple GROUNDUATER LEVEL: None Encountered (T) Ring Saaple ; NorCal Engineering i SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Trr OF TORNrH T_4 . PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE MOISTUREIX*4.2 5.8 6.5 OHY DENSITYtPCF)111.9 114.0 112.9 i^S SAMPLE TYPE 1R R R £»= SI 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMAAY APTUtl ONLY AT THt LOCATION OF THtl IOAINQ ANO AT THC TIUC OF OMILUNO. SUfllUMFACf COMOITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS ANO HAY CHANGS AT THIS LOCATION WITN THt FASWaJ OF riME. THt DATA HltStHTtO IS A SI«FLI,«lCAriON OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. ^ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp with minor root structures to 18" Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense ™ . - SAN** TYpES -v DATE DRILLED: 3_24-99 (C] Rock Core QF) Bulk Sanple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe |] Standard Split Spoon [Jj jar Sample 6ROUNDWATER LEVEL: None Encountered Qf) Ring Saaple NorCal Engineering iSODLS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF TRENCH T-5 * PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE Project Number 8017-99 Appendix B NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 TABLE I MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS (ASTM: D-1557-78) Optimum Sample Classification Moisture T1@2' SAND, fine to medium grained, 10.0 slightly silty T4@2' SAND, fine to medium grained, 9.0 slightly silty Maximum Dry Density (Ibs./cu.fU 125.0 123.0 Soil Type T1 @2' T4@2' TABLE II EXPANSION INDEX TESTS (U.B.C. STD. 29-2) Classification SAND, fine to medium grained, slightly silty SAND, fine to medium grained, slightly silty Expansion Index 05 06 TABLE III ATTERBERG LIMITS Same B1@ B1@ B2@ B2<§ >!§ !2-5' (9-11 !2-5' !9-11 Liquid Limit 23 21 23 20 Plastic Limit 17 16 17 16 Plasticity Index 6 5 6 4 Sample T1 @ 2' T4@2' % by weight SULFATE TESTS Sulfate 0.020 0.022 NorCal Engineering 2500 500 1000 1500 NORMAL STRESS (PSF) 2000 2500 3000 SYMBOL X O A D BORING NUMBER 1 3 4 4 DEPTH (FEET) 2.0 3.0 2.0 •5.0 t (DEGREES) 35 33 33 31 C (PSF) 150 100 50 150 DRY DENSITY (PCF) 116.6 113.6 113.0 111.4 MOISTURE CONTENT (X) 2.9 5.2 2.6 6.5 NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED ON SATURATED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (FM) FIELD MOISTURE TESTS PERFORMED ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (R) SAMPLES REMOLDED AT 905! OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Plate A 10 1.0 5 NORMAL PRESSURE (KSF) SYMBOL X o A D BORING NUMBER t 2 4 DEPTH (FEET) 5.0 8.0 10.0 DRY DENSITY (PCF) 113.9 110.1 113.4 MOISTURE CONTENT (*) 4.4 5.2 6.7 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY! INDEX (X) COMPRESSION REBOUND (FH) FIELD MOISTURE - NO «TER ADDED (R) SAMPLE REINJUED AT 90S OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY ,NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT fiO 17-99 1 DATE CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Plate B Project Number 8017-99 Appendix C NorCal Engineering TAYLOR CRITICAL HEIGHT METHOD: He ?«(FS)SN WERE He = VERTICAL HEIGHT OF SLOPE, FT. C = COHESION, PSF ym = MOIST DENSITY OF SLOPE MATERIAL, PCF 1 = SLOPE ANGLE, DEGREES FS = FACTOR OF SAFETY SN = TAYLOR'S STABILITY NUMBER BASED UPON FRICTION ANGLE, *.' AND SLOPE ANGLE, i <t> = INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE OF SOIL, DEGREES I. FOR 40* high 2;1 slope DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA: <fc = 34 Q T c = 125psf. *• = Tan'11 FOR i =_2j = 23 = 120 pcf, , FS-_L] He _, SN = JLJLL, ( 125PSf) ( 120Pcf)0.5)(0.01 ) _69_FT. NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS * PHO.JECT 8017-99 | DATE GROSS SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Plate C v\ ^£- $ Ji_ s :>o ^ *p 5o T- 5? ^ ^. OA V) - — . V3 -U -S)- -Si-S> _s> SP ^^ TV R W"SSSMi ^i2jbi >n •z. o> rx -v o u> mr- m -n O Z I 8;?Sg:ffllSPg:SS^gS: O? 309" s |* IT . m 100 I