The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1300 BASSWOOD AVE; ; CB030768; Permit03-17-2004 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB030768 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1300 BASSWOOD AV CBAD RESDNTL 2050522700 $175,085.00 0 0 Sub Type: Lot#: Construction Type: Reference #: Structure Type: Bathrooms: RAD 0 VN RUSSELL RES-1595 SF ADD & 450 SF GAR Applicant: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I 1300 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: ISSUED 03/17/2003 RMA 03/17/2004 03/17/2004 Owner: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I 1300 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'! Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $780.64 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $507.42 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $17.51 PFF $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $83.00 $20.00 $30.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,439.07 Total Fees: $1,439.07 Total Payments To Date:$507.42 Balance Due:$931.65 Inspector: PLANS IN STORAGE ATTACHED 7768 03/17/04 0002 01 02 FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE; Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which von_have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 931-65 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. [_ Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By C . j/ 0512 03/17/03 QOQ2 Ql—02- Address (include BIdg/Suife #)Business Name (at this address)CBP / 507-42 Legal Desctiptio Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units State/Zip Telephone # Fax ff Name Address City State/Zip Telephone Address City State/Zip Telephone #Name ' (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [S5003K Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (~1 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No, Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages a* provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sals (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).*i - Ofl I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work, 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hiraripthe following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): ^^ _ >^ ^ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(0 Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commencedjwphin 180 days f rorruyoate of^JCh permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced^f^rpeua^UBO day/tBectio\»re.4.4 Uniform Building Code). / / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE jT ^*^^rf£^P**l}^*~~~~ DATE S/f] *?& WHITE: File BELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Inspection List Permit*: CB030768 Type: RESDNTL RAD Date Inspection Item 07/28/2006 89 Final Combo 07/28/2006 89 Final Combo 04/19/2006 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 04/13/2006 17 Interior Lath/Drywatl 04/13/2006 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 04/13/2006 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs 04/04/2006 16 Insulation 03/30/2006 84 Rough Combo 03/29/2006 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weld in 03/29/2006 24 Rough/Topout 03/29/2006 34 Rough Electric 03/29/2006 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 03/10/2006 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 03/22/2005 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 08/26/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/28/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weld in 07/28/2004 21 Underground/Under Floor 07/23/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/14/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/14/2004 21 Underground/Under Floor Inspector - PY PY PY PY PY PY PY i PY PY PY PY PY PY PY i PY PY Act Rl AP AP AP AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP AP AP AP we PA RB PY PY CO CO AP RUSSELL RES-1595 SF ADD & 450 SF GAR Comments SEE NOTICE ATTACH EMR TPPB NEED STRAPS @ RIDGE slab on grade FTG OK TO POUR NEED SLAB WHEN READY STILL MISSING DETAIL FOR 2 POUR SYSTEM Monday, July 31, 2006 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/28/2006 Permit* CB030768 Title: RUSSELL RES-1595 SF ADD & Description: 450 SF GAR inspector Assignment: PY Sub Type: RAD 1300 BASSWOODAV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: OWNER RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I Owner RUSSELL GREGORY&YOLANDA Remarks: Phone: 7607201958 inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: YOLANDA Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR04076 ISSUED RUSSELL RES REV STRUCTURAL; PCR05046 ISSUED RUSSELL RES-REVISE HEADER CONN; & SHEAR WALL TRANSFER Inspection History CommentsDate 04/19/2006 04/13/2006 04/13/2006 04/13/2006 04/04/2006 03/30/2006 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 03/29/2006 03/10/2006 03/22/2005 Description 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywal! 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs 16 Insulation 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear Act AP AP AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP AP AP lns| PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY SEE NOTICE ATTACH EMR TPPB NEED STRAPS @ RIDGE City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/28/2006 Permit* CB030768 Title: RUSSELL RES-1595 SF ADD & Description: 450 SF GAR Inspector Assignment: PY 1300 BASSWOODAV Lot 0 Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: Suite: Location: OWNER RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I Owner: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I Remarks: Total Time: Phone: 7604159669 Inspector: Requested Entered By: JANEAN CD Description Act Comment 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR04076 ISSUED RUSSELL RES REV STRUCTURAL; PCR05046 ISSUED RUSSELL RES-REVISE HEADER CONN; & SHEAR WALL TRANSFER Inspection History Comments EMR TPPB NEED STRAPS @ RIDGE slab on grade FTG OK TO POUR NEED SLAB WHEN READY STILL MISSING DETAIL FOR 2 POUR SYSTEM Date 03/10/2006 03/22/2005 08/26/2004 07/28/2004 07/28/2004 07/23/2004 07/14/2004 07/14/2004 Description 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 14 Frame/Steel/Bo King/Welding 21 Underground/Under Floor 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor Act AP AP AP we PA CO CO AP lns| PY PY PY PY PY RB PY PY CITY OF CARLSBAD BUJtWNG-DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME LOCATION PERMIT NO. J03 FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTUp INFORMATION, CONTACT & YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FIELD TESTING REPORT w.o. DATE NAME HOURS SUPT EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR x TEST NO.LOCATION J ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE -flT LJL.. '/ 4 CRJOAJA .0 Li ) COMMENTS:XAJ- <? Of GeoSotts, inc. x T~t-A-/'~ 'RY- PAGE / E :/wp/forms/f iel dtst. wpd FIELD TESTING REPORTt, ;',-! .. . J-.w.o.DATE ff~j[<? NAME HOURS ni IFMT g 0 SSf L L SUPT EQUIPMENT frXJCffrRAfvr tegtf rnMTRAnrnR M t Of BAA 6) ^^7) mr.ATinM TEST NO.LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE -77615 Of s . AiL COMMENTS:Ml L^A-A - ftZ/4Tf Ai L F«**SH r GeoSqUs, Inc. BY: . PARF 'OF / E:/wp/forms/fieldtst.wpd '}"" FIELD TESTING REPORT w.o. DATE NAME HOURS CLIENT SUPT._ «J C fr" :5>*Ajf AA<&\**V& LOCATION. CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT f TEST NO.LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE • X> 3 - if /6- </ COMMENTS: r PAGE E:/wp/forms/fieldtst.wpd O- FIELD TESTING REPORT w.o. NAME HOURS 2 - O TRAfrr tttt SUPT CONTRACTOR A-/ EQUIPMENT M) ^M/JA r> TEST NO.LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE 0 PA COMMENTS: c Rf A 70 O Cr ) . - . ILL $ jo1 f GeoSoils, /jgc. > BY: : PAGE OF E:/wp/forms/fieldtst.wpd FIELD TESTING REPORT DATE NAME HOURS 5L ,f> CLIENT SUPT._ EQUIPMENT LOCATION. CONTRACTOR TEST NO.LOCATION ELEV. OR DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY P.C.F. RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST TYPE SOIL TYPE 91 / Z- •: Pf*f> '!/' 0 ~ jY^SrtY "7JT57S Tg"~r Of- GeoSoils, Inf. PAGE E:/wp/forms/fieldtst.wpd NOTICE OF FOOTING EXCAVATION OBSERVATION JOB LOCATION WORK t (A • OWNER OR CONTRACTOR OWNER'S ADDRESS DATE FOOTINGS OBSERVED TOT/AL NO. OF FOOTINGS OR CAISSONS l DESCRIPTION OF FOOTINGS OR CAISSONS COVERED BY THIS NOTICE: f IATTE S*A-T€*\A\ <>/f Af DIAGRAM OF APPROVED FOOTINGS (SHOWING DIMENSIONS IF APPLICABLE) THE UNDERSIGNED HAS OBSERVED THE FOOTING AND/OR CAISSON EXCAVATIONS LISTED ABOVE ON THE REFERENCED PROPERTY AND SAME WERE EXCAVATED IN ACCORD ANCE WITH OUR RECOMMEND ATION S IN THE PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION REPORT AND THE BUILDING CODE OF THE c fry rf BY FORM 80/2 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership witR government for <Bui£tfing Safety DATE: O3/11/04 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Room Additions/Garage/Decks for Russell Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: V. M^ C^Y/V^Je'ephone #: Date contacted:\j - ^tyffi ) * Fax #: Mail Te!ephorj£L/ Fax In Person REMARKS: V; Provide letter from soils engineer stating plans have been reviewed and found in compliance with recommendations^/On City set on SD5 (as noted on owners set in red) change detail 5 to 4 at upper right corner. 3) No special inspection is being required by engineer for 3000 psi slab as noted on S-2 as raon structural. Special inspection is required for epoxy anchors. / \ By: Ray Fuller A Enclosi Esgil Corporation U^W^ D GA D MB D EJ D PC 03704/04 tmsma.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (partnendip witfr government for Quihfing Safety DATE: 06/10/03 D APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Room Additions/Garage/Decks for Russell Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgi) Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [XJ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Karnak Planning & Design 2802 State Street Suite C Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robert Richardson Telephone #: (760) 434-8400 Date contacted: 6~*?-*3 (by:^ty) Fax #: (760) 434-8493 Mail ^Telephone Fax^ In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/03/03 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-768 06/10/03 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 06/03/03 06/10/03 REVIEWED BY: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad O3-768 06/10/O3 The items listed below are from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The remarks in bold are to emphasize the remaining problem. Did not receive a copy of the required soils report to verify items 10 thru 15. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Final sets of plans and any new calculations to be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also. 8. Show dryer vent termination to the exterior. Maximum 14 ft allowed for length with 4" (5" ok to 19 ft) and must be minimum 3 ft from any opening i.e. 2'6x2'0 window. Could not locate on A1.1 ? 10. Per city policy 2 listed below, 2 story additions require a soils report. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804.Did not receive a copy of required soils report. 11. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. Did not receive a copy of required soils report. 12. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 Did not receive a copy of required soils report. 13. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. Did not receive a copy of required soils report. 14. If applies: The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Carlsbad 03-768 O6/1O/O3 Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 15. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). Did not receive a copy of required soils report. 18. Architectural details provided need to be reviewed. See for example on A5.0 where referencing detail 8/AD-3, 10/SD-1, 6 SD-1 etc. In other places noting Det/SD-2 or SD-3. Recheck all locations. Notes in ink and changes in ink to be on vellums so as to be a permanent part of the plans. See on A5.0 where appears noting in ink the R values for insulation at floor, wall and roof. Section B is noting detail/SD-3 at center interior wall but does not state which number? 19. Provide Strong Wall details and reference to the plans. Show deepen footings for minimum 25" embedment required for the SSTB28's with additional 3" clearance required below the bolts. Should provide Strong wall details from Simpson i.e. off website as could not locate connections at top plates etc. CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 34. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. Under this condition, Esgil staff should advise the City (upon final transmittal) to place their "soils notice" stamp on the plans. Did not receive a copy of required soils report. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In (partnership vritfi government for Quitting Safety DATE: 03/26/03 Q>EBUCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Room Additions/ Garage /Decks for Russell Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Karnak Planning & Design 2802 State Street Suite C Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. !X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robert Richardson Telephone #: (760) 434-8400 Date contacted: <3/2?/c>3 (by: (C^ ) Fax #: (760) 434-8493 Mail "--^Telephone Fax S In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporationn GA n MB n EJ n PC 03/1 s/os 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-768 03/26/03 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue FLOOR AREA: Additions 1595 Garage 450 Decks 512 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 03/17/03 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 03/26/03 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 ft per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 03/18/03 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 03-768 03/26/03 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Final sets of plans and any new calculations to be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also. 2. 5'x4' window at landing to be tempered as shown on A1.0 when less than 60" above landing at stairwell. 3. Show or note that doors may open to the exterior only if the exterior landing is not than more than one inch lower than the door threshold. See garage. Section 1003.3.1.6 4. Could not locate any details for covered porch shown at entry. Doesn't appear to be existing and structural did not address spread footings, roof framing, positive post to footing and post to beam connections. Show size of ledger, hanger type and sizes, ledger attachment and calculations and any required bent straps for out of plane roof to wall loads. 5. Upstairs bedroom adjacent to laundry room does not appear to have adequate light and ventilation. The room is around 170 sq ft and this would require 17 ft of glazing and 8.5 sqft of ventilation. A4'x4' Xo only provides 14 sq ft of glazing and 6.4 sq ft of ventilation. Please revise any affected energy and structural calculations for additional fenestration required to meet minimum requirements listed above. 6. Show dryer vent termination to the exterior. Maximum 14 ft allowed for length with 4" ( 5" ok to 19 ft) and must be minimum 3 ft from any opening i.e. 2'6x2'0 window. Carlsbad O3-768 03/26/03 7. Note or show that 100 sq inches of make up air required at the laundry room. UMC 908.2 8. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). 9. The stairs on sheet A1.1 appear to be reflecting a winder condition where angle walls meet. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003.3.3.8.2 i.e. show minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. 10. Per city policy 2 listed below, 2 story additions require a soils report. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 11. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 12. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 13. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. 14. If applies: The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 15. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 16. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 17. Cover sheet of plans should reference all required special inspections or could note "See Sheet S1.1 for required Special Inspections". Carlsbad 03-768 03/26/03 18. Architectural details provided need to be reviewed. See for example on A5.0 where referencing detail 8/AD-3, IO/SD-1, 6 SD-1 etc. In other places noting Det/SD-2 or SD-3. Recheck all locations. 19. Provide Strong Wall details and reference to the plans. Show deepen footings for minimum 25" embedment required for the SSTB28's with additional 3" clearance required below the bolts. 20. Is detail 8/SD correct where referenced at FB-1 on sheet S-3? 21. Is FB-1 dropped or flush? If dropped, then note minimum required head height and any required straps if top plates are removed at end walls and any required drag straps. 22. Is detail 12/SD4 correct where referenced at CB-1 on S4? 23. Could not determine how CB-2 and CB-4 are to be supported where they intersect? 24. Reference all details provided to the plans. Appears 4/SD3 applies for support of RB-2? 25. Could not locate where grade of beams was noted i.e. Ridge 3 to be #1? 26. Wall line E is to be ballooned framed at stairwell to prevent hinge point. Could not locate calculations, size and spacing of these 18 high studs. Section B/A5 to be reviewed at stairwell as noted above. 27. How will height to width ratio be maintained at stairs when wall is 18 ft high? 28. Detail 8/SD4 is reflecting some type of L metal on either side of window sill and bolted connection but it is not identified? 29. Detail 11/S-4 as noted above CB-3 should reflect similar as no shear specified above beam on S4? 30. Detail 7/SD3 is noted for connection of 4-4 xlO's above laundry room. Appears will need special hardware detailed for these type connections. 31. Specify how obtaining the required minimum % inch per foot deck slope for drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers, slope framing etc. If ripping, note maximum taper cut and calculations to reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist. Section 1. Carlsbad O3-768 03/26/03 32. Could not locate how addition is to be heated. Assume new unit is being added. If in attic verify minimum 30" head clearance is provided and reference appropriate key notes i.e. 32 on A1.0. 33. Show or note that battery operated smoke detectors is required at all existing bedrooms and hallways leading to existing bedrooms. • CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 34. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. Under this condition, Esgil staff should advise the City (upon final transmittal) to place their "soils notice" stamp on the plans. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ,FROM : KARNflK RRCH/PLflN'G INC. PHONE NO. : 760 434+8493 Mar. 27 2003 05:02PM P8 Curlabad Q3-768 09/36/03 ,i r i m t- M t BUILDING DEPARTMENT pIOTICE OF RKOyrfiKMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Ptex Check No. 03-76* Job Address or Legal Description 1300 Bsuwwood Avenue Addrest You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is r squired to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet The Registered Special inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit, Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or IC30 are approved as Special Inspectors forth* type of construction far which they are ettttified. Too inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of CorUbad building department. The inspcctiflna by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Intpecior is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan charges. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will 101 be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the namee of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet or-rt eiw J7 JBU FROM <flRNGK flRCH/PLRN'G INC.PHONE NO. : 760 434+B493 Mar. 27 2003 05:02PM P9 03-768 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM Q3/36/O3 ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION; PLAN CHECK NUMBER: .Cg-76j OWNER'S NAME: <? I, a8 the owner, or agent of the owner (contractor* may net employ the special inspector), certify that I, orthtf-archjtecVengineer of record, will be responsible for emptoying the spedaf inspectors) e« required by Uniform Building Code (UftC) Section '701.1 for the Construction project bceteo>t the site JJaMebow. UBC Section 106.3.5. Sfeaod I. as the enginMr/mehteet of record, entity that I h*v» prtpa*** the progrtm BS required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construobon project located at the site listed above. 1. Lift ofwortc requiring speclel Inepectiwi: Son* Compllanee Prior to Foundation Inepectfon Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSl Preetreeeed Concrete Strueturel Meebmy Deeigner Specified G FMdWeldirto Hltfi Strength Bottlng Expenelon/Epoxy Anehore SprfyechOn Ftreprooffng U other 2. Nvneft) of lndMdu»U») or firm(») reeponelble for the «p«t«l trwpeettom Meted abevei c. 3. Duties of the epetiel Iwpector* for the work noted tbove: A. groxf A^<>t0<^ ^p/bxj ^T /ci3o "^s7-? B. . C. ~~~~~^ ~ SOftcrti tncpunn ihal ohick fn wWi H* Cfty ind praaem ttwir oped*fitt*to far iotmMuiflfig^biglnnlM woi*an<h* job •AB. WIST! cnrv: >?, Jew Carlsbad 03-768 03/26/03 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-768 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 03/26/03 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 Ul TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Additions Garage Decks Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 1595 450 206 CB Valuation Multiplier Per City Est. By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 175,085 175,085 $780.64 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: E ["1 Repetitive Fee ^T| Repeats Comments: Complete Review D Other r-i Hourly Structural Only Hour Esgll Plan Review Fee $507.42 $437.16 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: BUILDING AD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please sea. the attached report of deficiencies marked withjK**Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date: FOR OFFECIALjUSE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92QQ8 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 HAWORODOCStCHKLSTOulUng Plandwck CIM Form (GwMric).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site olan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures Existing Street Improvements Property Lines Easements G. H. I. J. Right-of-Way Widt{j.& Adjacent Streets Driveway widths £/«* ^) Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service Existing or proposed irrigation service Show on site Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5* away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and" wateTservice (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per e on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\WORCXDOCStCHKlSTOuldlnB Ptanctwc* CWtt Forni <Gmi1c).doc ND rd BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. D IH D 4b, All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS d 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Yz" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the mWORCWOC&CHKLSTOulMfne Ptanctw* Ckfcl Fonn (ROCHE • HARVEY 7-12-00).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST iST ,ND ,RD D D D D checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by:Date: Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the nenggsary^HtMiia. Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be ^nqtarizjed and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement, agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Please return Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. D D D GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by:Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WOHD\DOCS\CHKLSTeuHcHng Pltndwck CfclM Forni (Ganeric 7-14-00) (Joe BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST D OND D gRD D nan 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit reauired for: a a a a D a INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 10.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. Q uired fees are attached fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. HAWORCWOCSUHKLSTOuMIng Plandwck ChM Forni (GMWfc) .doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST )ND >RD D D • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PS!) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, ail major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WOREnDOCS\CHKLS1\BUUIrv PbndiM* CUM Forni (GtmrtcHtoc 1ST 2ND 3'RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. these irrigation D 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a jfund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. 'However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. D D 3. dditional Comments: H^WORD\DOCS\CHKLST>Buldlna Ranctiec* CM« Form (Generic) Ax: DD n n PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: Greg Fisher Phone (7601 602-4629 Type of Prt>ject & Use:_ Zoning;_|4lJ General Plan- CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Net Project Density:.DU'AC Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net dev acres: Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) 1^*71 r"™*iLegend: (XI Item Complete 1_J Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: ^_ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO DATE TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: . Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO. NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES_ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: NO n n Follow-Up Actions: 1} Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required:YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing .Ordinance - May 21, 1993.] Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 Site Plan: D D 1- Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines. easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). OH] 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES. \ J NO 2, Project complies YE! Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: 2. Accessory structure Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: ^^ Structure^jepfffation 3. Lot Coverage: B 0 NO1 <- Required ^ Required CT Required ^ Required f& Reouired setbacks: Required Required ^- — " ReOttrrScP ^-^^Required : Required Required -^ 1st " '''* -/ Shown /{/Q ~~ »< Shown £f Shown " ' Shown 7/<£" Shown "^"^ Shown Shown Shown Shown f(s Shown (Is \£ 4- Height: 5. Parking: Required Spaces Required Shown Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown [H d CD Additional Comments, / / .A OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst DATE Rev 9/01 Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 - (760)438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 June 30, 2003 W.O. 3924-A-SC Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell c/o Karnak Architecture and Planning 2802 State Street, Suite C Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Robert Richardson Subject: Geotechnical Plan Review, Improvement of Property at 1300 Basswood Avenue, City of Carlsbad, California. References: 1. "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Improvement of Property at 1300 Basswood Avenue, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California," W.O. 3924-A-SC, dated April 21, 2003, by GeoSoils, Inc. 2. "Architectural Plans for: Russell Residence Remodel, Building Permit Application," Sheets C1.0, AO.O through A-5.0, No Project No., dated January 27, 2003, revised May 28, 2003, by Karnack Planning and Design. 3. "Structural Plans, Notes and Details for: Greg and Yolanda Russell, 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad, Ca. 9200 (sic)," No Project No., dated May, 20, 2003, by SUN Structural Engineering, Inc.. Dear Mr. Richardson: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), has performed a review of our preliminary geotechnical evaluation (Reference No. 1), the architectural plans, details, general notes (Sheets C1.0, AO.O through A-5.0) prepared by Karnack Planning and Design (Reference No. 2), and the structural plans, notes, and details (Sheets S1 through SD5), prepared by SUN Structural Engineering, Inc. (Reference No. 3), for the subject site. GSI's scope of services included a review of the aforementioned documents, analysis of data, and preparation of this letter/report. Based on our review, the plans reviewed appear to be in general conformance with the recommendations provided by this office and presented in GSI's preliminary report (Reference No. 1), with the following comments: • While noted on several of the structural plan details, specific criteria regarding the 4 inch slab underlayment were not noted. Based on our review of Reference No. 1, slab underlayment should consist of "a minimum 4 inches of sand. In addition, a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of 10-mil pgjyyinvl-chloride membrane with all laps sealed, should be provided at the mid-point of the sand layer. The slab subgrade should be free of loose and uncompacted material prior to placing concrete." The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility for work, testing, or recommendations performed or provided by others. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. ~ Respectfully submi GeoSolls, Inc.sviewed by: Robert G. Crisman Engineering Geologist, CEG 1934 RGC/DWS/JPF/jk Distribution: (4) Addressee David W. Skelly Civil Engineer, RC£"^7857 Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad Fite:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.gpr W.O. 3924-A-SC June 30,2003 Page 2 GeoSoi Is, Inc. s. inc. Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION IMPROVEMENT OF PROPERTY AT 1300 BASSWOOD AVENUE CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FOR MR. AND MRS. GREG AND YOLANDA RUSSELL C/O KARNAK ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 2802 STATE STREET, SUITE C CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 W.O. 3924-A-SC APRIL 21, 2003 Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad. California 92008 • (760)438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 April 21,2003 W.O. 3924-A-SC Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell c/o Karnak Architecture and Planning 2802 State Street, Suite C Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Robert Richardson Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Improvement of Property at 1300 Basswood Avenue, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Dear Mr. Richardson: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), has performed a preliminary geotechnica) evaluation of the subject site. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the onsite soils and geologic conditions and their effects on the proposed additional site development from a geotechnical viewpoint. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Based on our review of the available data (see Appendix A), field exploration, laboratory testing, and geologic analysis, residential development of the property appears to be feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint, provided the recommendations presented in the text of this report are properly incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The most significant elements of this study are summarized below: • All existing surficial colluvium (topsoil) and weathered terrace deposits are considered to be loose and potentially compressible, and are not suitable for foundation support. These materials will require removal and recompaction and/or processing in-place. Colluvium, with underlying weathered terrace deposits, is on the order of 2feet thick. As an alternative, the foundation systems may be deepened into the underlying terrace deposits. * At this time, groundwater is generally not anticipated to affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction, and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated into the construction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along zones of contrasting permeabilities should not be precluded from occurring in the future due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities. Should perched groundwater conditions develop, this office could assess the affected area(s) and provide the appropriate recommendations to mitigate the observed groundwater conditions. Our laboratory test results indicate that soils onsite are generally very low in expansion potential and are anticipated to present a negligible sulfate exposure to concrete. Site soils may likely be corrosive to ferrous materials. Conventional foundation systems utilizing slab-on-grade or raised wood floors may be used onsite. Colluvium and weathered terrace deposits should be reprocessed for slab support. Alternative methods of subgrade preparation and slab construction are presented herein. Foundations should either be supported entirely on compacted fill, or penetrate any surficial colluvium/weathered terrace deposits and be founded into the underlying competent terrace deposits. Footing depths on the order of 24 to 36 inches below existing grades are anticipated. An expansion/construction joint should be placed between any existing and proposed structures, to permit relative movement. The geotechnica! design parameters provided herein should be considered during construction by the project structural engineer and/or architect. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC Filo:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page Two GeoSoils, Inc. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of farther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoSolls, Inc. Robert G. Crisman Engineering Geologist £?/ P. Franklin lineering Geologist, DG/RGC/JPF/DWS/jk Distribution: (4) Addressee Reviewed by: David W. Skelly Civil Engineer, RCE 47857 Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell File: e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge W.O. 3924-A-SC Page Three GeoSoils, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 SITE CONDITIONS/PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 SITE EXPLORATION 1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 4 EARTH MATERIALS 4 Colluvium 4 Terrace Deposits 4 MASS WASTING 5 FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY 5 Faulting 5 Seismicity 5 Seismic Shaking Parameters 7 Seismic Hazards 7 LABORATORY TESTING 8 General 8 Moisture-Density Relations 8 Shear Testing 8 Expansion Potential 9 Corrosion Testing 9 CONCLUSIONS 9 EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 9 General 9 Site Preparation 10 Removals 10 Fill Placement 10 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Foundation Design 11 Foundation Construction 12 RETAINING WALLS 13 General 13 Restrained Walls 14 Cantilevered Walls 14 Wall Backfill and Drainage 14 GeoSoils, Inc. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 15 Landscape Maintenance and Planting 15 Additional Site Improvements 15 Trenching 15 Drainage 16 Utility Trench Backfill 16 PLAN REVIEW 17 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING 17 LIMITATIONS 18 FIGURES: Figure 1 - Site Location Map 2 Figure 2 - Exploratory Boring Location Map 3 Figure 3 - California Fault Map 6 ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A - References Rear of Text Appendix B - Hand Auger Boring Logs Rear of Text Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell Table of Contents File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page ii Inc. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION, IMPROVEMENT OF PROPERTY AT 1300 BASSWOOD AVENUE CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of our services has included the following: 1. Review of the available geologic literature for the site and vicinity (Appendix A). 2. Geologic site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, sampling, and mapping. 3. General areal seismicity evaluation. 4. Appropriate laboratory testing, engineering, and geologic analysis of data collected and preparation of this report. SITE CONDITIONS/PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The site consists of an irregularly shaped lot located on the north side of Basswood Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, California (see Figure 1). The site is surrounded on the remaining sides by residential property and a park to the south. Topographically, the site slopes gently to the west. Existing improvements consist of a single family residential structure with typical residential landscaping. Proposed site development is anticipated to consist of additional ground floor construction to the south and southwest corner of the main residence. Either raised wood flooring or concrete slab-on-grade are anticipated for the additional construction to the main residence. Building loads are assumed to be typical for this type of relatively light construction. The need for import soils is unknown. SITE EXPLORATION Site exploration was performed on April 16,2003, by a representative of this office. Near surface soil conditions were explored with three exploratory test excavations completed with hand equipment. The location of each excavation is shown on the attached Boring Location Map (Figure 2). Each excavation was logged and representative samples were collected for laboratory testing. Logs of each excavation are presented in Appendix B. GeoSoils, Inc. Base Map; The Thomas Guide, San Diego County Street Guide and Directory, 2003 Edition, by Thomas Bros. Maps, page 1106, 1"=1/2 mile IM Rtproduotd with p«rml*«ton arinttd by Thoma* Bro«. Maps.ThU map l« copyrlghtad by Tft«nwt Bros. Mapi. It ta unlawfulto oopy or rvproduc* all or any part tturtof, wh«th»i forpersonal uaa or raaala, without pwmhaion. All rlghti r«s«rv«d. w.o. 3924-A-SC SITE LOCATION MAP Figure 1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject property is located within a prominent natural geomorphic province in southwestern California known as the Peninsular Ranges. It is characterized by steep, elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly. The mountain ranges are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the southern California batholith. In the San Diego region, deposition occurred during the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded, and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed from the deposition of marine/terrestrial terrace deposits. During mid to late Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded, and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coastal and beach areas. The site is generally underlain by terrace deposits. EARTH MATERIALS Earth materials onsite consist of colluvium and Pleistocene age terrace deposits. A description of each material type is presented in the following discussion. Colluvium Colluvium was encountered as a relatively thin (approximately 1 to 11/2 feet thick) surficial layer of silty sand. Where encountered, these materials are typically dark brown, wet, and loose. These soils are considered potentially compressible and are not suitable for the support of settlement sensitive improvements in their present condition. Terrace Deposits Pleistocene-age terrace deposits underlie the site. Where encountered, these materials are typically brown to gray brown, dry to moist, and medium dense. The upper ±1/2foot of the terrace deposits are weathered, loose, and considered not suitable for structural support. Based on our site exploration, terrace deposits appear relatively massive. Elsewhere in the vicinity, it has been our experience that bedding structure within terrace deposits is relatively flat lying; therefore, adverse bedding conditions are not anticipated. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.O. 3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21, 2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 4 GeoSoils, Inc. MASS WASTING No evidence of any significant pre-existing mass wasting features were indicated or observed during field exploration or during a review of available publications. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISM 1CITY Faulting Our review indicates that there are no known active faults crossing this site within the area proposed for development, and the site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997). However, the project area is situated in Southern California, which is in an area of active faulting. These include, but are not limited to, the San Andreas fault, the San Jacinto fault, the Elsinore fault, the Coronado Bank fault zone, and the Newport-lnglewood/Rose Canyon fault zone. The location of these, and other major faults relative to the site, are indicated on Figure 3 (California Fault Map). The possibility of ground acceleration, or shaking, at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the southern California region as a whole. Major active fault zones that may have a significant affect on the site, should they experience activity, are listed in the following table (modified from Blake, 2000a): ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME Coronado Bank-Agua Blanca Elsinore Newport-lnglewood-Offshore Rose Canyon APPROXIMATE DISTANCE MILES (KM) 21.4(34.5) 23.9(38.5) 5.3 (8.6) 5.3(8.5) Selsmlcltv The acceleration-attenuation relations of Idriss (1994) Horizontal-Rock/Stiff Soil, Bozorgnia, Campbell and Niazi (1999) Horizontal-Soft Rock-Correlation and Campbell, and Bozorgnia (1997 Rev.) Soft Rock, Horizontal-Random have been incorporated into EQFAULT (Blake, 2000a). For this study, peak horizontal ground accelerations anticipated at the site were determined based on the random mean plus 1 - sigma attenuation curve and mean attenuation curve developed by Joyner and Boore (1981; 1982a; 1982b; 1988; and 1990), Bozorgnia, Cambell, and Niazi (1999), and Campbell and Bozorgnia (1994). EQFAULT is a computer program by Thomas F. Blake (2000a), which performs deterministic seismic hazard analyses using up to 150 digitized California faults as earthquake sources. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad File: e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge W.O. 3924-A-SC April 21,2003 Pages GeoSoils, Inc. CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP Bass wood 1100 1000-- 900 -- 800 -- 700 -- 600 -- 500 -- 400 -- 300 -- 200-- 100-- 0-- -100 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600 W.O. 3924-A-SC Figure 3 GeoSoils, Inc. The program estimates the closest distance between each fault and a given site. If a fault is found to be within a user-selected radius, the program estimates peak horizontal ground acceleration that may occur at the site from an upper bound ("maximum credible") earthquake on that fault. Site acceleration (g) is computed by any of at least 30 user-selected acceleration-attenuation relations that are contained in EQFAULT. Based on the EQFAULT program, peak horizontal ground accelerations from an upper bound event at the site may be on the order of 0.34g to 0.70g. Seismic Shaking Parameters Based on the site conditions, Chapter 16 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC, International Conference of Building Officials, 1997), the following seismic parameters are provided: Seismic zone (per Figure 1 6-2*) Seismic Zone Factor (per Table 16-1*) Soil Profile Type (per Table 16-J*) Seismic Coefficient Ca (per Table 1 6-Q*) Seismic Coefficient Cv (per Table 1 6-R*) Near Source Factor Na (per Table 16-S*) Near Source Factor Nv (per Table 16-T*) Seismic Source Type (per Table 16-U*) Distance to Seismic Source Upper Bound Earthquake 4 0.40 So 0.44 NB 0.64 Nv 1.0 1.08 B 5.3mi (8.5 km) MW6.9 * Figure and table references from Chapter 1 6 of the Uniform Building Code (1997). Seismic Hazards The following list includes other seismic related hazards that have been considered during our evaluation of the site. The hazards listed are considered negligible and/or completely mitigated as a result of site location, soil characteristics, and typical site development procedures: • Liquefaction • Tsunami • Dynamic Settlement • Surface Fault Rupture • Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 3924-A-SC April 21, 2003 Page 7 It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of a maximum probable or credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any structure(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a structure's mass, than from those induced by the hazards considered above. This potential would be no greater than that for other existing structures and improvements in the immediate vicinity. LABORATORY TESTING General Laboratory tests were performed on a representative sample of the onsite earth materials in order to evaluate their physical and engineering characteristics. The test procedures used and results obtained are presented below. Moisture-Density Relations The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for representative site soils was determined according to test method ASTM D-1557. A maximum dry density of 130 pcf at an optimum moisture content of 9 percent was determined for a bulk composite sample obtained from the site. Shear Testing Shear testing was performed on a representative, remolded sample of site soil in general accordance with ASTM test method D-3080 in a Direct Shear Machine of the strain control type. The shear test results are presented below: SAMPLE LOCATION Bulk Composite PRIMARY COHESION (PSF) 286 FRICTION ANGLE (DEGREES) 27 RESIDUAL COHESION (PSF) 271 FRICTION ANGLE (DEGREES) 27 Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad Fi1e:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge W.O. 3924-A-SC April 21, 2003 Pages GeoSoils, Inc. Expansion Potential Expansion testing was performed on a representative sample of site soil in accordance with UBC Standard 18-2. The results of expansion testing are presented in the following table: LOCATION Bulk Composite EXPANSION INDEX 0 EXPANSION POTENTIAL Very Low Corrosion Testing Based on our experience in the vicinity, the sulfate exposure to concrete is anticipated to be negligible, per Table 19-A-4 of the 1997 UBC. Site soils may be corrosive to ferrous materials when saturated. Soil pH is typically neutral to slightly acidic. Soil corrosion testing was not included in the scope of our evaluation. Consultations with a corrosion engineer should be considered. CONCLUSIONS Based upon our site reconnaissance test results, it is our opinion that the subject site appears suitable for the proposed residential development. An expansion/construction joint should be placed between any existing and proposed structures, to permit relative movement. The following recommendations should be incorporated into the construction details. EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS General All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the UBC and the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, except where specifically superceded in the text of this report. Prior to grading, a GSI representative should be present at the preconstruction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if needed, and review the earthwork schedule. During earthwork construction, all site preparation and the general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill selectively tested by a representative(s) of GSI. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 3924-A-SC April 21, 2003 Page 9 by this office and, if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Site Preparation Debris, vegetation, and other deleterious material should be removed from the building area(s) prior to the start of construction. Sloping areas to receive fill should be properly benched in accordance with current industry standards of practice and guidelines specified in the UBC. Removals In order to provide for the uniform support of the planned floor slabs, the existing colluvium and weathered terrace deposits within the floor slab areas should be reprocessed and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. At this time, it is anticipated that the depth of these materials is on the order of 2 feet; however, locally deeper removals may be necessary, and should be anticipated. Removals should be completed below a 1:1 projection down and away from the edge of any settlement sensitive structure and/or limit of proposed fill. Once removals are completed, the exposed bottom should be reprocessed and compacted. As an alternative, surficial soils exposed at the proposed slab grade may be processed to an approximate depth of 6 to 12 inches and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. Slab-on-grade construction recommendations presented in a later section of this report will be different for these two alternatives. Fill Placement Subsequent to ground preparation, onsite soils may be placed in thin (±6-inch) lifts, cleaned of vegetation and debris, brought to a least optimum moisture content, and compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. If soil importation is planned, a sample of the soil import should be evaluated by this office prior to importing, in order to assure compatibility with the onsite site soils and the recommendations presented in this report. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS General In the event that the information concerning the proposed development concept is not correct, or any changes in the design, location, or loading conditions of the proposed Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21, 2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 10 GeoSoils, Inc. structure are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by this office. It is our understanding that the addition to the main residence will consist of either raised wood floors and a conventional strip and spread footing foundation system, or continuous footings and concrete slabs-on-grade. The information and recommendations presented in this section are not meant to supercede design by the project structural engineer. Upon request, GSI could provide additional input/consultation regarding soil parameters, as related to foundation design. It is anticipated that the proposed foundation systems for the single-story addition to the main residence will be deepened to penetrate any colluvium and be founded into the underlying sedimentary bedrock. Foundation Design 1. Conventional spread and continuous footings may be used to support the proposed residential structure provided they are founded entirely in suitable terrace deposits. Footings should not simultaneously bear directly on sedimentary bedrock and fill soils. 2. Analyses indicate that an allowable bearing value of 1,500 psf may be used for design of continuous footings, 12 inches deep by 12 inches wide, and design of isolated pad footings 24 inches square and 18 inches deep into suitable terrace deposits. This value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional 12 inches in depth, to a maximum of 2,500 psf. No increase in bearing for footing width is recommended. The bearing value may be increased by one-third for seismic or other temporary loads 3. For lateral sliding resistance, a 0.35 coefficient of friction may be utilized for a concrete to soil contact when multiplied by the dead load. 4. Passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 250 pcf with a maximum earth pressure of 2,500 psf 5. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. 6. Footings should maintain a horizontal distance, or setback, between any adjacent slope face and the bottom outer edge of the footing. The horizontal distance may be calculated by using h/3, where (h) is the height of the slope. The horizontal setback should not be less than 7 feet, nor need not be greater than 40 feet (per code). The setback may be maintained by simply deepening the footings. Flatwork, utilities, or other improvements, within a zone of h/3 from the top of slope, may be subject to Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21, 2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a,pge Page 11 GeoSoils, Inc. lateral distortion. Footings, flatwork, and utility setbacks should be constructed in accordance with distances indicated in this section, and/or the approved plans. 7. Provided thatthe recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design and construction phase of development, a majority (>50 percent) of the anticipated foundation settlement is expected to occur during construction. Maximum settlement is not expected to exceed approximately 1/2-inch and should occur below the heaviest loaded columns. Differential settlement is not anticipated to exceed 1/4-inch between similar elements, in a 20-foot span. Foundation Construction 1. Conventional continuousfootings may be constructed per UBC guidelines regarding width for low expansive soil conditions. Footings should be embedded at least 12 inches into suitable terrace deposits. Based on the anticipated thickness of surficial colluvium, footing depths on the order of 30 to 36 inches below existing grade are anticipated. Footings should be reinforced with No. 4 reinforcing bars, one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom of the footing, for footings no deeper than 24 inches. For footings greater than 24 inches in depth, an additional reinforcing bar should be added. 2. Detached isolated exterior piers and columns should be founded at least 12 inches into the underlying terrace deposits and tied to the main foundation in at least one direction with a grade beam. Reinforcement should be properly designed by the project structural engineer. 3. A grade beam, reinforced as above, and at least 12 inches square, should be provided across the garage entrances (if any). The base of the reinforced grade beam should be at the same elevation as base of the adjoining footings. 4. Where colluvium and weathered terrace deposits are removed and reprocessed, floor slabs should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches. Concrete used in floor slab construction should have a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 psi. Where slab subgrade is surficially processed only, floor slabs should be a minimum 5 inches thick. Concrete used in floor slab construction should then have a minimum compressive strength of 3,000 psi. It should be noted that while the increased thickness and strength of floor slab concrete should exceed the performance of a 4-inch slab, this does not preclude the potential for distress due to settlement of any untreated colluvium and weathered terrace deposits left in place beneath the slab. 5. Concrete slabs should be underlain with a minimum of 4 inches of sand. In addition, a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of 10-mil polyvinyl-chloride membrane with all laps sealed, should be provided at the mid-point of the sand layer. The slab Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.O. 3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21, 2003 File; e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 12 GeoSoils, Inc. subgrade should be free of loose and uncompacted material prior to placing concrete. 6. Concrete floor slabs should be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars placed 18 inches on center each way for 4-inch thick slabs; 5-inch thick slabs should be reinforced with No. 4 reinforcing bars placed 18 inches on center each way. All slab reinforcement should be supported to ensure proper mid-slab height positioning during placement of the concrete. "Hooking" of reinforcement is not an acceptable method of positioning. 7. The moisture content of the subgrade soils should be equal to, or greater than, optimum moisture to a depth of 12 inches below the adjacent ground grade in the slab areas for low expansive soil conditions. Soil moistures should be verified by this office within 72 hours of the vapor barrier placement. 8. Soils generated from footing excavations to be used onsite should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard, whether it is to be placed inside the foundation perimeter or in the yard/right-of-way areas. This material must not alter positive drainage patterns that direct drainage away from the structural areas and toward the street. 9. As an alternative, an engineered post-tension foundation system may be used. Recommendations for post-tensioned slabs can be provided on request. RETAINING WALLS General Foundations may be designed using parameters provided in the "Design" section of Foundation Recommendations presented herein. Wall sections should adhere to the City of Carlsbad guidelines. All wall designs should be reviewed by a qualified structural engineer for structural capacity, overturning, and stability. The design parameters provided assume that onsite, or equivalent, medium expansive soils, or selected fill, are used to backfill retaining walls. If expansive soils are used to backfill the proposed walls within this wedge, increased active and at-rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall design. Heavy compaction equipment should not be used above a 1:1 projection up and away from the bottom of any wall. The following recommendations are not meant to apply to specialty walls (cribwalls, loffel, earthstone, etc.). Recommendations for specialty walls will be more onerous than those provided herein, and can be provided upon request. Some movement of the constructed walls should be anticipated as soil strength parameters are mobilized. This movement Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0,3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21,2003 Fils:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 13 GeoSoils, Inc. could cause some cracking dependent upon the materials used to construct the wall. To reduce wall cracking due to settlement, walls should be internally grouted and/or reinforced with steel. Restrained Walls Any retaining walls that will be restrained priorto placing and compacting backfill material, or that have re-entrant or male corners, should be designed for an at-rest equivalent fluid pressures of 65 pcf for native soil backfill, plus any applicable surcharge loading. For areas of male or re-entrant comers, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall (2H) laterally from the corner. Building walls below grade should be water-proofed, or damp-proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. Refer to the following section for preliminary recommendations from surcharge loads. Cantllevered Walls These recommendations are for cantilevered retaining walls up to 15 feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events, or adverse geologic conditions. SURFACE SLOPE OF RETAINED MATERIAL HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL Level 2to1 (H:\fl EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHT PCF (Native Verv Low Exoansive Soil) 42 55 The equivalent fluid density should be increased to 65 pounds pcf for level backfill using the native soil at the angle point of the wall (corner or male re-entrant,) and extended a minimum lateral distance of 2H on either side of the corner. However, if the selected backfill with angle of friction of 30 degrees is used, this value may be reduced to 62 pounds pcf. Wall Backfill and Drainage All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate gravel and pipe backdrain and outlet system (a minimum two outlets per wall) to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures, and be designed in accordance with minimum standards presented herein. Pipe should consist of schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. Gravel used in the backdrain systems should be a minimum of 3 cubic feet per lineal foot of % to 1Vfc inch clean crushed rock Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 3924-A-SC April 21, 2003 Page 14 encapsulated in filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent). Perforations in pipe should face down. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted to 90 percent relative compaction with native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. As an alternative to gravel backdrains, panel drains (Miradrain 6000, Tensar, etc.) may be used. Panel drains should be installed per manufacturer's guidelines. Regardless of the backdrain used, walls should be water proofed where they would impact living areas or where staining would be objectionable. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of soil and slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained, and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for planted slopes. Overwatering should be avoided. Graded slopes constructed within and utilizing onsite materials would be erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover soon after construction. Plants selected for landscaping should be light weight, deep rooted types which require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Compaction to the face of fill slopes would tend to minimize short term erosion until vegetation is established. In order to minimize erosion on a slope face, an erosion control fabric (i.e., jute matting) should be considered. From a geotechnical standpoint, leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils area is processed for the purpose of adding amendments, they should be recompacted to 90 percent relative compaction. Additional Site Improvements Recommendations for additional grading, exterior concrete flatwork design, and construction, including driveways, can be provided upon request. If, in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request. Trenching All footing trench excavations for structures and walls should be observed and approved by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell ' W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21,2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 15 GeoSoils, Inc. excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. GSI does not consult in the area of safety engineers. In addition, the potential for encountering hard spots during footing and utility trench excavations should be anticipated. If these concretions are encountered within the proposed footing trench, they should be removed, which could produce larger excavated areas within the footing or utility trenches. Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Roof gutters and down spouts should be considered to control roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet a minimum of 5 feet from the proposed structure or into a subsurface drainage system. We would recommend that any proposed open bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 10 feet. As an alternative, closed bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. Utility Trench Backfill 1. All utility trench backfill in structural areas, slopes, and beneath hardscape features should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Flooding/jetting is not recommended for the site soil materials. As an alternative, imported sandy material with an S.E. of 30 or greater may be flooded/jetted in shallow (± 12-inch or less) under-slab interior trenches only. 2. Sand backfill, unless trench excavation material, should not be allowed in exterior trenches adjacent to and within an area extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing. 3. All trench excavations should minimally conform to CAL-OSHA and local safety codes. 4. Soils generated from utility trench excavations to be used onsite should be compacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. This material must not alter positive drainage patterns that direct drainage away from the structural area and towards the street. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21,2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 16 GeoSoils, Inc. PLAN REVIEW Final site development and foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment, as the plans become available, for the purpose of minimizing any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition, foundation excavations and any additional earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested by this office. If conditions are found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at thattime. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING We recommend that observation and/or testing be performed by the geotechnical consultant at each of the following construction stages: • During grading/recertification. • After excavation of building footings, retaining wall footings, and free standing walls footings, prior to the placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. • During retaining wall subdrain installation, prior to backfill placement. • During placement of backfill for area drain, interior plumbing, utility line trenches, and retaining wall backfill. • After presoaking/presaturation of building pads and other flatwork subgrade, prior to the placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. • During slope construction/repair. • When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during any construction operations, subsequent to the issuance of this report. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21,2003 File:e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 17 GeoSofls, Inc. LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our previous laboratory study are believed representative of the area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed during mass grading. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing, or recommendations performed or provided by others. The scope of work was performed within the limits of a budget. Inasmuch as our study is based upon the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing, and engineering analysis, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. Mr. and Mrs. Greg and Yolanda Russell W.0.3924-A-SC 1300 Basswood Avenue, Carlsbad April 21,2003 File: e:\wp9\3900\3924a.pge Page 18GeoSoils, Inc. APPENDIX A REFERENCES APPENDIX A REFERENCES Blake, T.F., 2000a, EQFAULT, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration from 3-D fault sources; Windows 95/98 version. Hart, E.W. and Bryant, W.A., 1997, Fault-rupture hazard zones in California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform building code: Whittier, California. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Joyner, W.B, and Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B, and Boore, D.M., 1990, Empirical methods of ground-motion estimation, in Proceedings of the Port of Los Angeles Seismic Workshop, San Pedro, California, March 20-23, in press. Petersen, Mark D., Bryant, W.A., and Cramer, C.H., 1996, Interim table of fault parameters used by the California Division of Mines and Geology to compile the probabilistic seismic hazard maps of California. Sowers and Sowers, 1970, Unified soil classification system (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487-667) jn Introductory Soil Mechanics, New York. Treiman, J.A., 1993, The Rose Canyon fault zone, southern California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File report OFR 93-02. , 1991, Rose Canyon fault zone, San Diego county, California: California division of Mines and Geology, Fault evaluation report FER-216, July 10, revised January 25, 1991,14p. Weber, F.H., 1982, Geologic map of north-central coastal area of San Diego County, California showing recent slope failures and pre-development landslides: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, OFR 82-12 LA. Wilson, K.L, 1972, Eocene and related geology of a portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas quadrangles, San Diego County, California: unpublished masters thesis, University of California, Riverside. GeoSoils, Inc. APPENDIX B HAND AUGER BORING LOGS l 8» o<NO)x CM--a <i CO C3 £=CC OCQ cro U. O Oo DESCRIPTION*£Q t (T> git£g~LL UJcc *~ s?" o5 "E°" n" ""^GROUPSYMBOLX Q_ *i UJ ^ O Oz .Eio z CO CDO•4—"CD5co.QtoTDQ~z. CO COLLUVIUM:porous.CO ^_ o Q?CO>2^j__•COCOI—TERRACE DEPOSrose; porous.WEATHEREDbrown, wet, loCO i- ^D)OC5Q"POSITS: SIL7Y SANedium dense.TERRACE DEbrown, wet, mCO CO CM 3'ter Encountered5-03Total Depth =No GroundwaBackfilled 04-1CQ mui3a GeoSoils, Inc. cc to". ,=•CO^ -dSo.-o <i (Oaz DC OCQ DC O a. U. O a 3 oQ.DESCR> . \L Q MOISTURE(%)GL H ^GROUPSYMBOLX Q. -c111 ^ Q C3 ~ O o z ffl <D~ooQ)c-OCOQ 2 CO ^COLLUVIUfporous.I o Q^^**CO^_JCOCOCOoa.LU TERRACE Dose; porous.Q 0 WEATHEREbrown, wet,CO CM T- I"D)OC5oQZ.CO^POSITS: SIL1edium dense.LU £TERRACE Cbrown, wet,CO c? CM "D(D 3lter Encounter5-03" § 4^ -a oQ- ^ "0030)Q 2 p-5 0 -g "5 o to H Z CD CM CQ §a. O^oSoils, Inc. < « CM•<*• cc CDCM . li-en «CO ^ -!Z-So.O -a <5 g (O OZ ocOm DC O u.Oao DESCRIPTION££s«^3gs"gIL. " LU DC ,_.H- C? CO Si- Os yEa. Jr o S&£ HQ GROUPSYMBOLXK™ ""^Q_ •*-•m E-LU *••*Q C5 idCC X 0 Z CQ 0toO_O-i— ~CDO^^CO•oQz<CO5 CO s COLLUVIUporous.S CO "-S!^^x io Q"~z_COfcbCOCO TERRACE DEPOSI1OUJ WEATHERose; porous._o +-*0) c o .a S CO C\l sgl,JS T~ >*COO)o4— >c£o1—-Qn"POSITS: SILTY SANIedium dense.m ED c TERRACEbrown, wet,2 CO CO1C\J 3'ter Encountered5-0311 i4-C -g O+•• —Q. C -D 0) 3 (DQ 2 = ra^3 -go o toH 2: CQ CO CQ COCQHI3a. GeoSoils, Inc. MAR-15-2004 NON 10:10 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX MO. 76Q 602 8558 P, 04 City of Carlsbad 03r 1 O M 11 U i M < i O t * p ;> r t in e n I CERTIFICATE QF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MTTIGAUQN This form must be completed by tn* City, die applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to iatuinfi a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school tee form.' • " • • *f\ ' Ji v1/*- ' •' Project Name; Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential:Numhftr of New Dwelling Units Square feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area In SOU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area / Commercial/Industrial; Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of ~" Applicant Information:Date: SCHOOL DISTRICTS wfTHIF THE *JTTY W CARLSBAD San Mucos 1 Jnifttd School District San Marcos, CA 92069(736-2200) Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 £1 Cimino Real Caifcbftd CA 92009 (33l-500QL Entimtas Union School District 101 South Rancho Sant& Fe Rd Entinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Sun Diegutto Union High School District 710 Eccmita,-. Blvd. Encinitaa. C/\ 92024 (753-6491) Cwtiftcation of Applicant/Owners, The perean executins this doclaration (U0wn«r") certifies under ptnatty of perjury that (1) the information provided above la correct and tnj* to the dttt of me Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the, additional foe if Owner requ**tt.airlncr*ate in the number of oweUing gn'rte or square footage after the building permit is Issued oUHhe initial determination of units or square footage IK found to b* Incorrect, and that (2) the Owner Is th>ow^r/das^lop«^rf the above described project^), 01 that the person executing thic declaration is authorized to slgrujJHiehalf of Signature:Date: Revised 4/20/00 1635 Faraday Avsnue • Cftr-labad, CA 92OOB-7314 • (760) 6OS-2700 Building Counter • (780) 6Q2-S719 * FAX (760) 602-8658 MAR-1S-2034 JJON 10:3; AH CITY OF 04RSLBAD FAX HO, 760 602 3553 P, 05 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district^)) ****Jr**********«»***********************+* ****«•*•. THiS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED, SCHOOL DISTRICT; The undersigned, being duty authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER QA^LEN FREEMAN DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CAHLSBAOU 6225 EL CAM1NO REAL 07-07-2004 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR04076 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1300 BASSWOOD AV CBAD Permit Type: PCR Parcel No: 2050522700 Lot #: Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: Reference #: CB030768 Project Title: RUSSELL RES REV STRUCTURAL 0 NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 05/19/2004 Entered By: SB Plan Approved: 07/07/2004 Issued: 07/07/2004 Inspect Area: Applicant: ROBERT RICHARDSON SUITE C 2808 STATE ST 92008 434-8400 Owner: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA 1300 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 6068 07/07/04 02 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120.00 $0.00 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$120.00 PERMIT APPLICATION » • CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO, EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposj Validated £ 'Address-(include Bldg/Suite #)Business Nam a (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Name 4; y PROPERTY OWNER /IS <£ Address State/Zip Telephone # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # MAME ~" : ...... - •... = •, M-V -;» - .-;.'; -..;.:«•• ^SJ.rll^K^:!51;"'.-^'::;;^^1:.'!./:^;::.:;?/1 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031 .5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars IS 5001). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION = • > ;•• • - •.. -\. ,. ; • . .. • ... •', / . /' • '. :>;•;': -: ^ -..-., ^: -^., ;1 •; ••}&*,,,;:!:'. :•" :-V \ •;= 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec, 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I' as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE NO iCOMRLET^ THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY f ', {. =" : ; ^ | | r ! = ! f;; ; Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ;«,;:L;JCQNSTRUCTION UNDING AGENCV 1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097{i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued rw the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comnWce_gjfl£LtuiD_lgOslays from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned ^t any time after the work is commenceoj«ta periodonjlO^d^ays (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). /APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation * t • In Partners/tip witR government for Quitting Safety DATE: 07/01/O4 Q AEHJCANT QQURISJ JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER P FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR04-076 (03-768) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Plan Changes for Russell Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) * Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person jf^7\i/ REMARKS: Project description orv^T^yWolJtehft^tate entire existing building to be demolished but instead entire wine/? Previous approved city sets sent back. By: Ray Fuller ^"^ Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/28/04 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership witd government for Quitifing Safety DATE: O5/27/04 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad &~PtAPTREViEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCRO4-076 (03-768) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Plan Changes for Russell Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Karnak Planning & Design 2802 State Street Suite C Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. /<] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robert Richardson Telephone #: (760) 434-8400 Date contacted: ejn/^ (by:^) Fax #: (760)434-8493 Mail ^" Telephone Fax^ In Person REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA n MB D EJ D PC 05/20/04 tmsmti.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad PCR04-076 (03-768) 05/27/04 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR04-076 (03-768) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue FLOOR AREA: Additions 1595 Garage 450 Decks 512 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 03/17/03 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 05/27/04 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 ft per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 05/20/04 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad PCR04-076 (03-768) 05/27/04 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Final sets of plans and any new calculations to be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also. Architect to sign plans. 2. The extend of work appears to have changed i.e. demo existing living room and kitchen, new roof framing, new footings etc and move windows and doors at kitchen and revise shear walls. If existing living room and kitchen is being demolished then the permit application and cover sheet of the plans should reflect this. 3. Please provide a copy or original calculations as could not determine how V was determined. 4. The previously approved foundation plan has noted on sheet S-2 in ink that "03/17/04 Per GeoSoils report/letter a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of 10 mil polyvinylchloride membrane with all laps sealed shall be provided at the mid point of sand layer and a minimum slab underlayment of 4" of sand." This should be noted on new sets. 5. Specify length of all shear panels at their respective locations. Detail and reference how maximum aspect ratio of 2 to 1for shear panels is meant i.e. size and number of blocks, strap type and size at window/door openings. Some of panels shown do not have lengths and others appear to need detail 8/SD4 referenced to them as do not meet height to width ratio? Shear walls shown that are not part of calculations (i.e. no length shown) should be noted with * for example and noted for stiffness only to prevent inspection problems in the field. Carlsbad PCRO4-076 (03-768) 05/27/04 6. Could not determine if and where special inspection for epoxy anchors applies now? If no longer applicable should be removed from plans or applicable details referenced. No calculations but does the 3000 psi concrete require special inspection or was 2500 used in calculations. If using 3000 psi and no special inspection required or desired then this should be noted on S-2 to prevent potential inspection problems in the field. 7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the new foundation plan has been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. City of Carlsbad i^ ~~MMH^HMMMMB^^MM^BMMM^^H^^M^^HH^B^MBHBuilding Department Carlsbad PCRO4-076 (03-768) O5/27/O4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No, PCR04-O76 (03-768) Job Address or Legal Description 1300 Basswood Avenue Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) Carlsbad PCRO4-O76 (O3-768) 05/27/04 [SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspectors) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at die site listed above. Signed 1. List of woric requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI Prestressed Concrete Structural Masonry Designer Specified Q Reid Welding High Strength Sotting ' Cxpansion/Epoxy Anchors Sprayed-On Fireproofing D Other • _ 2. Name(s) of individuals) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: ,* B. C. 3. Duties of the special Inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Spatial inspectors shal check hi with ttw City and present their credwBate for appravaJeilaJabftginnhiQWOfkontheiob site. |D Carlsbad PCR04-O76 (03-768) 05/27/04 . [VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 768) PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller BUILDING ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR04-O76 (03- DATE: 05/27/04 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 Ul TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq.Ft) CB Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($} i I Plan Check Fee by Ordinance J^ Type of Review: p Complete Review $120.00 Structural Only T~ Repetitive Fee Repeats r r * Based on hourly rate Comments: Other Hourly Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee r r $96.00 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc IDENGINEERING SUN Structural Engineering, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineers 2525 Pio Pico Dr. Suite 102 Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Tel/Fax: 760-434-7928 Structural Calculations Greg & Yolanda Residence Shear Wall Revision at Kitchen SUN Structural Engineering, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineers Greg & Yolanda Addition Revision Date: 04/2004 By: C.Sun Sht- 22' Tjffe v i-ft- V FT- SUN Structural Engineering, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineers Greg & Yolanda Addition Revision Date: 04/2004 By. LIKE. 5.5' '* I LIKfc \J- LI Greg & Yolanda Addition RevisionSUN Structural Engineering, Inc. Date: 04/2004 Consulting Structural Engineers gy. Q gun g^ d '$\r i > 03-22-2005 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR05046 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: 1300 BASSWOOD AV CBAD PCR 2050522700 Lot #: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: VN RUSSELL RES-REVISE HEADER CONN & SHEAR WALL TRANSFER Applicant: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I 1300 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Status: ISSUED Applied: 03/09/2005 Entered By: RMA Plan Approved: 03/22/2005 Issued: 03/22/2005 Inspect Area: Owner: RUSSELL GREGORY J&YOLANDA I 1300 BASSWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $60.00 $0.00 Total Fees:$60.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$60.00 4317 03/22/05 0002 01 CGP 02 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition* of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date f Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No, Phase No, Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work ' (?£\^O4 ^ ,2. CONTACT PERSON (If different from applicant) SO. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name Address City Q: Contractor Q Agent for Contractor Q Owner L7] Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone Fax# Name Address Citv State/Zip Telephone # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # i> COMPANY; NAME (Sec. 7031,5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [S500D. Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone it Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone COMPENSATION; Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit Is Issued, Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and ctvil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURED DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason; D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). [3 I, ss owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). F~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. 1 personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR/VO/V-ff£S/£>£/V77.4£ BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES CH NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. p^ :jCONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097|i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS^ 9,^ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for exceptions over 5'0" deeXand demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued£y*fn^J*uilding OffrciaL«nd*^ne provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is noJ^Jfrime/iced within 180 ddysJram the dateipistKfffoermit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned t any time after (he work is^ornrQe^pfe^Sr ayferiod o/18JJ^fays (SectiyrQaBjKf Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In (Partnership witfi government for (Bitibfing Safety DATE: 03/16/05 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR05-046 (03-768) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue PROJECT NAME: Structural Detail Changes for Russell Residence XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Previous approved City sets send back. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB [U EJ D PC (P) 03/10/05 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad PCRO5-O46 (O3-768) 03/16/05 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR05-046 (03-768) PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 03/16/05 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1300 Basswood Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 Ul TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) CB Valuation Multiplier _ By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $60.00 Type of Review:Complete Review 1 1 Repetitive FeeRepeats D Other r-ri Hourly 0.5 Structural Only Hour $48.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 rnacvalue.doc ENGINEERING SUN Structural Engineering, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineers Greg & Yolanda Residence Addition Date: 03/2005 By: C.Sun Sht- -£. BUILDING DEPt 2,- ^ w/ i6-<k fi (>*o*c crLU U_ 00 M'O'J