HomeMy WebLinkAbout1335 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB004799; Permit09-10-2001
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
.# Dwelling Units:
Bedrooms:
Project Title:
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Residential Permit Permit No:CB004799
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
1335 CHESTNUT AV CBAD
RESDNTL
2052100900
$291,339.50
6
1
Sub Type:
Lot#:
Construction Type:
Reference #:
Structure Type:
Bathrooms:
SFD
0
VN
SFD
4
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Status:
Applied:
Entered By:
Plan Approved:
Issued:
.Inspect Area:
Orig PC#:
ISSUED
12/19/2000
JM
09/10/2001
09/10/2001
SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF, COV ENTRY 178 SFPIan Check*:
Applicant:
PLEIN BOB
202
2541 STATE STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
760-729-7964
Owner:
Total Fees: $26,385.59 Total Payments To Date: $840.50 Balance.Due: $25,545.09
Building Permit
Add'! Building Permit Fee
Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park in Lieu Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
Other Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Reel. Water Con. Fee
$1,293.08 Meter Size
$0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee
$840.50 Meter Fee
$0.00 SDCWAFee
$0.00 CFD Payoff Fee
$29.13 ,PFF
$1,755.00 PFF (CFD Fund)
$0.00 License Tax
.$0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund)
$0.00 Traffic Impact Fee
$0.00 . Traffic Impact (CFD Fund)
$0.00 SidewalkFee
$0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL
$0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL
$0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL
$0.00 Housing impact Fee
$2,400.00 Housing InLieu Fee
D5/8 Master; Drainage Fee
$0.00 SewervFee:
$0.00 Additional Fees
TOTAL^PERMlT FEES
$0.00
$80.00
$1,871.00
$0.00
$5,302.38
$4,894.50
$0.00
$0.00
$432.00
$488.00
$0.00
$203.00
$60.00
$70.00
$0.00
$4,515.00
$0.00
^$1,959.00
$193.00
$26,385.59
Inspector:
FINAL APPROVAL
Date:Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
1.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO.
EST.
Plan Ck. Deposit/•*"
Validated By
Date
t) ,IU/
MlV\\0o
Address (include BlBldg/Suite #)
**• SO -- Ola V
Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description- wo - o°\Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number ltlSS. 12/lmia|i>N§002 #§Punits
940-50Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Uses H
Description of Work SQ. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms
2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant)- • • st
Name Address
3, APPLICANT [jLContractor Q Agent for Contractor Owner
Name
4. PROPERTY OWNER "
Address
City
I Agent for Owner
City
State/Zip Telephone tt
CWv
Fax*
State/Zip Telephone #
_i fi —^
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME
(Sec. 7031 .5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code! or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
.exemption. Any violation of Section 7031 .5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of no^more than five hundred dollars [$500]).
VWttvoSfr- CONsftr, Ovfr . >S*AA frV*ftx St* ^>OV. W^sWS. OP>\.\ °V>ofag -\V»Q --\
Name
State License #
Address
License Class
-*-
City State/Zip
City Business License #
Telephone #
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License #
6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
tfi- I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: ,
Insurance Company ^JO~sg£\ fr*»<frbAK\ "Pv^Sl^ Policy No."^^0 OQOVA.VXo ~QO V Expiration Date V^VVV O V-
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS)
l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE DATE
7, OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION
1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
n I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
l~l I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
l~l I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES I~|NO
2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number):
5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? l~l YES O NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~) YES l~l NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME S&v<Vs-VjJa£A' Q/W*"1^- \>PyfvC. LENDER'S ADDRESS
9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
/APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
City of Carlsbad
Final Building Insnection
Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire~~•Date:.^04/22/2002
Permit Type^ MRESDNTL
Plan Check #:
Permit*: CB004799
Project Name: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Sub Type: SFD
SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF, COV ENTRY 178 S
Address: 1335 CHESTNUT AV Lot: 0
Contact Person:
Sewer Dist: CA
Inspected
Bv: $&!<=£ /2#/7?-S
Inspected
Bv:
Inspected
Bv:
Comments:
Phone:
Water Dist: CA
Date , /
Inspected: ^/z-<S/* t~ Approved: ^
Date
Inspected: Approved:
Date
Inspected: Approved:
"" Disapproved:
Disapproved:
Disapproved:
City of Carlsbad
Final Building Inspection
Dept: Building Engineering Pianftmcp CMWD St Lite Fire
Plan Check #:
Permit #:
Project Name:
Address:
Contact Person:
Sewer Dist:
Inspected
Bv:
Inspected
Bv:
Inspected
Bv:
Comments:
CB004799
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF,
1335 CHESTNUT AVI
Phone:
CA Water Dist: CA
Date
VVT^> Inspected:
Date
Inspected:
Date
Inspected:
Date:
Permit Type:
Sub Type:
COV ENTRY 1 78 S
Lot: 0
Approved: *
Approved:
Approved:
04/22/2002
RESDNTL
SFD
Disapproved:
Disapproved:
Disapproved:
Inspection List
Permit*: CB004799 Type: RESDNTL SFD
Date Inspection Item Inspector Act
05/31/2002 89
05/31/2002 89
05/29/2002 89
05/29/2002 89
04/30/2002 19
04/30/2002 29
04/30/2002 39
04/30/2002 49
01/23/2002 82
01/10/2002 84
01/09/2002 14
01/09/2002 24
01/09/2002 34
01/09/2002 44
01/07/2002 84
12/04/2001 15
11/28/2001 15
11/16/2001 15
10/12/2001 22
10/05/2001 11
10/05/2001 12
10/04/2001 11
10/04/2001 12
09/28/2001 21
09/28/2001 22
09/21/2001 22
Final Combo
Final Combo
Final Combo
Final Combo
Final Structural
Final Plumbing
Final Electrical
Final Mechanical
Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test
Rough Combo
Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin
Rough/Topout
Rough Electric
Rough/Ducts/Dampers
Rough Combo
Roof/Reroof
Roof/Reroof
Roof/Reroof
Sewer/Water Service
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Steel/Bond Beam
Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Steel/Bond Beam
Underground/Under Floor
Sewer/Water Service
Sewer/Water Service
RGB
-
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
PS
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
RGB
AP
Rl
Rl
NR
we
we
CO
we
AP
AP
CO
AP
CO
AP
CA
AP
NR
AP
AP
AP
AP
CO
CO
AP
we
AP
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF, COV
Comments
FINAL - ALL SIGNATURES ARE ON
CARD GMR
1ST INSPECTION OF THE DAY PLLEASE
PM PLEASE
TUB NOT HOOKED UP HEARTH AT
NOT INSTALLED
EMR
OK TO INSULATE
TOO MANY TO LIST
PROTECTION OF CABLE AT ATTIC
ACCESS
OK TO COVER
F/P
OK TO COVER (TRUSSES NEED TO BE
STAMPED) NAILING ON TRIPLE GIRDES
MISSING
OK TO COVER
MISSING DOWELS ACROSS BOTH
GARAGES, ALSO 2 MATS FOR 2 PIERS
OK TO COVER
Monday, June 03, 2002 Page 1 of 1
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 05/31/2002
Permit# CB004799
Title: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Description: SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF, COV ENTRY 178 SF
Inspector Assignment: RGB
1335 CHESTNUT AV
Lot 0
Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD
Job Address:
Suite:
Location:
APPLICANT PLEIN BOB
Owner: CHESTNUT HOMES LLC
Remarks: 1ST INSPECTION OF THE DAY PLLEASE
Phone: 7604197879
Inspector:
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By: JOHN
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Act Comments
x^(L/t-<#1
Associated PCRs
Inspection History ' i
Date
05/29/2002
04/30/2002
04/30/2002
04/30/2002
04/30/2002
01/23/2002
01/10/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/07/2002
12/04/2001
11/28/2001
11/16/2001
Description
89
19
29
39
49
82
84
14
24
34
44
84
15
15
15
Final Combo
Final Structural
Final Plumbing
Final Electrical
Final Mechanical
Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test
Rough Combo
Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
Rough/Topout
Rough Electric
Rough/Ducts/Dampers
Rough Combo
Roof/Reroof
Roof/Reroof
Roof/Reroof
Act
NR
we
we
CO
we
AP
AP
CO
AP
CO
AP
CA
AP
NR
AP
Insp
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
PS
Comments (
TUB NOT HOOKED UP HEARTH AT F/P
ii
EMR
OK TO INSULATE
TOO MANY TO LIST
NOT INSTALLED
PROTECTION OF CABLE AT ATTIC ACCESS
OK TO COVER
OK TO COVER (TRUSSES NEED TO BE STAMPED) NAILII
TRIPLE GIRDES MISSING
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 04/30/2002
Permit# CB004799
Title: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Description: SFD 3337SF, GAR 636 SF, DK 67 SF, COV ENTRY 178 SF
Inspector Assignment: RGB
Sub Type: SFD
1335 CHESTNUT AV
Lot 0
Type: RESDNTL
Job Address:
Suite:
Location:
APPLICANT PLEIN BOB
Owner:
Remarks: LATE AM PLEASE
Phone: 7604197879
Inspector:
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Requested By: JOHN
Entered By: CHRISTINE
Act Comments
CO
Associated PCRs
Insoection History
Date
01/23/2002
01/10/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/09/2002
01/07/2002
12/04/2001
11/28/2001
11/16/2001
10/12/2001
10/05/2001
10/05/2001
10/04/2001
Description
82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test
84 Rough Combo
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
24 Rough/Topout
34 Rough Electric
44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers
84 Rough Combo
15 Roof/Reroof
15 Roof/Reroof
15 Roof/Reroof
22 Sewer/Water Service
1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
12 Steel/Bond Beam
1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Act
AP
AP
CO
AP
CO
AP
CA
AP
NR
AP
AP
AP
AP
CO
Insp
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
PS
RC
RC
RC
RC
Comments
OK TO INSULATE
TOO MANY TO LIST
PROTECTION OF CABLE AT ATTIC ACCESS
OK TO COVER
OK TO COVER (TRUSSES NEED TO BE STAMPED) NAILING ON
TRIPLE GIRDES MISSING
OK TO COVER
MISSING DOWELS ACROSS BOTH GARAGES, ALSO 2 MATS FOR 2
PIERS
10/04/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam CO RC
DAILY FIELD ENGINEERING REPORT
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC,
Client; •Work Order;232_
Clients Representative:Tract No.Date: /Q/4/Q/
Project Name;Day:
Project Location:Weather Conditions:
Contractor:Approximate Fill Yardage :
Type and Number of Rigs in Operation:
Description of Project Activities:/AJ '*:>&?'£ .7?O*;5
Site Visitors / Firm:
TECHNICIAN
Page /of /
HOURS BILLED
TO PROJECT
Field
.- o
Office For Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.
Received by:
yv— V~»
dafldrpt.sam
f PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 921 1 1
TELEPHONE: (619) 560-1713
NOTICE OF EXCAVATION INSPECTION
JOB .nra-nnM. ftFtfMbSft fk/Mtt ST/Wl*} &££& L/
• ftd^ / ZH'WO~RK ORDER Mn • f / ' _ REF. WORK ORDER NO.:
. n£ftfflbSAOWNER OR
DATE INSPECTED: U^/U&frf<> 4-
TYPE OF EXCAVATIONS: CONTINUOUS FOOTING Y. SPREAD FOOTING.
rAlSSnN - FRICTION PILE SWIMMING POOl / ' *- '
DESCRIPTION OF EXCAVATIONS COVERED BY THIS NOTICE:
f A004799 ' ' tftt C#£Sr*MJT Atf C-BAO
CONDITIONS OF
•
The undersigned has inspected the excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated in accord-
ance with our recommendations in the preliminary foundation report and the Building Code of the
: /r
P AC IEJC SO ILS ENGI WE£ R ING, I IMC.
DISTR: (1) Office
(2) Inspector
(3) Project
Form 79
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 05/11/01 ^ l
Q APPLICANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO::: 004799 SET: III a FILE
a PLAN REVIEWER
PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel # 1
PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A SB B)
I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
><] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person. ' "•
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
IXI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
| | Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: ; Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
XT REMARKS: Provide another set of manufacturer roof truss_drawingsjo^elevations (A &
B) to the City. I ' ^
By: KalTumalieh / A, /Enclosures: *i rn / -v-J1 P/
Esgil Corporation ,^/h^^) yo Q^^OA^m^^\^ <y£tf (/^? I^OD J^^
D GA D MB D EJ D PC LOG/' . trnsmtl.dot
Ifr^S?
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123. 4 (858)560-1468 4- Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: O3/O8/O1
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
Q PLAN REVIEWER
PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4799 SET: III a FILE
PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel # 1
PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A & B)
I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bob Plein '-M Telephone #: (760) 729-7964
Date contacted: $} %jv, (by:Tf^r) Fax #: (760) 729-5514
Mail "Telephone -- Fax <-^[n Person (-£>^±{-j
REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ D PC 02/27/01 tmsmtLdot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 * (858) 560-1468 ^ Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad OO-4799
03/08/O1
NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the
previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes
in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
• Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two
sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways:
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008,
(760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the
Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). The requested
information is not submitted.
2. Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this
application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included
with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not
included." Section 106.3.3. Are the site block walls part of this permit if so then
provide structural calculation and structural details. The requested information
is not submitted. Is the site block walls part of this permit ? yes or no.
3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2.
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code.
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
• SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION The requested information is not submitted.
Carlsbad OO-4799
03/08/01
8. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks. The
requested information is not submitted. Please provide detail and cross
reference to plans. See attached detail
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
9. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree
elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Sheet 17 is not found.
• STRUCTURAL
12. Please clarify if the soil report is applicable to both Master Map. Lots 5 and 6.
Yes or No.
18. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. The requested
information is not submitted.
19. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer
roof truss package applies to unit B only. The requested information is not
submitted.
20. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify
that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may
follow. The requested information is not submitted. Verify the design of all
drag trusses.
30. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson
strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO # PFC- 5485). For
units A & B.
a) In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels.
Table 23-ll-G. For example for second floor shear wall along grid line D.1.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
EsGii Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 01/04/01
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4799 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel #1
PROJECT NAME: Chestnut Homes (Units A & B)
I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
[X] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
I | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
IXI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008
I I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bob f/_^//J Telephone #: (760) 729-7964
Date contacted: (Is Joi (by: ^ ) Fax-#: ("76a)"729 •&'
Mail^/Telephonec-/Fax,/^ In Person
REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D MB D EJ n PC 12/21/00 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 4799
01/04/01
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 4799 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel #1
FLOOR AREA: Dwelling (3337) STORIES: Two
Garage (636), Deck (97)
Covered Entry (178) HEIGHT: 27 Ft. (App. per UBC)
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21/00
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh
COMPLETED: 01/04/01
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when vou submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 4799
01/04/01
• Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in
one of two ways:
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed
by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil
Corporation is complete.
1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code).
2. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2.
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code.
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
• SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION
3. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for
approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section
106.3.5. Please complete the attached form.
4. Please clarify the size and type of window # 22 at bedroom #1. Is a window or a
door?
5. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3.
a) Rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum.
6. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be
sloped a minimum of Vi inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3.
7. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks.
Carlsbad 4799
01/04/01
8. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage ceiling common to the
dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4.a) Provide 2 layers of 1/2" of type "X" Gyp.
Boards for TJI floor joists, per ICBO approval (NER 200) for TJI.
• MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
9. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree
elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2.
• STRUCTURAL
10. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
11. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation
inspection. Section 108.5.2.
12. Specify the slab on grade thickness and reinforcement on plans per soil report.
13. Specify the depth, width and reinforcement of foundation on foundation plan.
14. Show all the required isolated concrete pads on foundation plan. For example at
girder truss span. See calculation page 10.
15. Show the design drag loads for all roof drag trusses.
16. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords.
17. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer
roof truss package applies to unit B only.
18. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify
that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may
follow.
19. Cross-reference all calculations to plans. Please number all beams, to allow me
to Correctly check structural calculations. For example show where beam
( RBM-3) j occurs on framing plans.
20. Provide structural calculation for header 4x10 at master bedroom.
tv/ Carlsbad 4799
01/04/01
21. Specify all required floor joists (TJI) depth and series on framing plans.
22. Provide beam to beam connection detail. Specify the required hangers. For
example connection of floor beam FB #1 to FB#2.
23. Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting
girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section
2320.8.5.
24. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per
Section 1630.1.1.
25. Show all required shear walls on plans. For example show the required
second floor(roof) shear walls along grid line ( 2 ). Please coordinate between
structural calculations and plans.
26. Verify the length of all shear walls shown on plans. Please coordinate between
lengths shown on plans and lengths required by structural calculations. For
example for second floor (roof) shear wall along grid line 1 for unit B.
27. Provide lateral design for first floor along grid lines 3.1 & 4.
28. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson
strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO # PFC- 5485). For
units A &B.
29. Specify the required A35 spacing for each shear walls type. See section (5/10).
30. Specify the spacing for all stud walls on plans.
CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
1 Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to
the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written
approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans
should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges.
2 For gas piping under slabs that serve kitchen island cooktops, see Policy 91-46 for
special sleeve and clean-out requirements.
3 New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note
"two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage
and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093).
4 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar
panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not
directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093).
Carlsbad 4799
O1/04/O1
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 4799
O1/O4/01
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: •
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special
inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at
the site listed above.
Engineer's/Architect's Seal
& Signature Here
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
Q Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Q Field Welding
D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI D High Strength Bolting
D Prestressed Concrete D Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
O Structural Masonry CD Sprayed-On Fireproofing
D Designer Specified D Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
A. ;
B.
c. •••
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A. ^_^
B.
C.
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site.
Carlsbad 00-4799
01/04/01
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh
PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4799
DATE: 01/04/01
BUILDING ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel #1
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
Dwelling
Garage
Deck
Cov. Entry
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdiction Code
AREA
( Sq. Ft.)
3337
636
97
178
cb
Valuation
Multiplier
City Est.
By Ordinance
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance j ^
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
291,339
291,339
$1,293.08
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance
Type of Review:
EH Repetitive Fee
r Repeats
Complete Review fj Structural Only
D Other
D Hourly Hour(s) *
Esgil Plan Review Fee
$840.50
$672.40
Comments:
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue.doc
DATE:
BUILDING ADDRESS:
City-of Carlsbad
Public Works' — Engineering
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
PLANCHECK NO.: CB
C/.&StfiLi -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A/&J
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Sf -f3J A -EST. VALUE:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
Qk Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
Please se^ th& attached report of deficiencies
marked With D. A/lake necessary corrections to plans
or spafcificaticVs for compliance with applicable
codes end standards*} Submit corrected plans and/or
specificaltofis to this pffice for review.
Date:
Date
Date
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMiT:
By:
ATTACHMENTS
D Dedication Application
U Dedication Checklist
D Improvement Application
D Improvement Checklist
D Future Improvement Agreement,
D Grading Permit Application
D Grading Submittal Checklist
D Right-of-Way Permit Application
[] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
D Sewer Fee Information Sheet
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER
City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2741
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
CA 92OO8)-7314 • (760) 602-272O • FAX (760) 6O2<»S5@@
^C \3 D
D D
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
PLAN _
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
Arrow
& Proposed Structures
Cj^xisting Street Improvements
Property Lines
iht-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Driveway widths
Existing or proposed sewer lateral
Existing or proposed water services"
Existing or proposed irrigation service
/Tut-/
2. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service
(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however,
second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards. ' • ,
3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
B. Assessor's Parcel Number
C. Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
H:\WORDVDOCSCHKLST\BuHng Plancteck CMst Form (Generic).doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
CHSCRCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for__ /^7 X7 *— /~\ ^* D & X'y>«. *i j!f~ ^3 ** •** /---' tj^.ljy i A ^-r*. _ ' >Project No._ \J&y*xZ> QuewjLe CfaJ-^- y {
D D D 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/z" x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by:Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
6a, All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buildina Planchee* Cklsl Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OOJ.doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
ST 3rd
D
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by:Date:
6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
D D D
D D
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following:
6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export).
7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by:Date:
. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
N:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bullding Planchrek Cklst Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OOJ.doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST
D
oND
D
3RD
D
n a
7d .No Grading Permit required.
7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
SCELLANEOUS PERMITS
8.A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:/fatd l—
D D D
D D D
D
D D D
9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
10. NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first.
11. ETRequired fees are attached
Q No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
• All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BulUlng Plancheck CMst Form (Genertc).doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
A ST pND 3RD
D D D
• If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
• Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
• If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the
installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street).
12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should
look like:
STA 1+00 Install 2" service and
2.
3.
1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bufldinfl Plancheck Ckht Form (Genenc).doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
.•si 2ND 3RD
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
D D D 12c- Irrigation Use (where recycled water Is available)
1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
ODD 13. Additional Comments:
H:\WORD\OOCSVCHKLST\BulUing Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc
D
D
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
- A/O
Address:BI'dg. Permit No._
Prepared by: /^^/^
t 1 .
EDU CALCULATIONS/
Types of Use: ^
Types of Use:
APT CALCULATIONS:
Types of Use: « /
Types of Use:
FEES REQUIRED:
Date:/ /7s7 O f Checked by:
/ l / /
List types and square footages for all uses.
•''•^ Sq. Ft./Units:
Sq. Ft./Units:
List types and square footages for all uses.
^fy Sq. Ft./Units:
Sq. Ft./Units:
k
Date:
EDU's: /
EDU's:
ADT's: /
ADT's:
WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO
D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE / PARK AREA & #: ___/___
FEE/UNIT:/^7^5 X NO. UNITS: ' = $
D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT
ADT'/s/UNITS:
D 3. BRIDGE AND
ADT's/UNITS:
D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEI^
UNIT/SQ.FT.:
D 5. SEWER FEE
EDU's:
FEE/ADT:= $^s
JGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2
: X FEE/ADT:
VIENTFEE ZONE:
X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:
DIST. #3
= $
)jd^
<&
BENEFIT AREA:
EDU's:X FEE/EDU:.
D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500)
D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_
ACRES: '
= $_
= $_
= $
HIGH /LOW
X FEE/AC:- $
D 8. POTABLE WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE
ft)
SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION
Word\Docs\Misforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet
Iof2
Rev. 7/14/00
^Or
PRQJFCT iNSPFrrnp
PROJECT
4178 ENG. INSPECTIONS
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE
El 01
rwrg-
DRAPING PERMIT NO
LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE:
N/A = NOT APPLICABLE
V= COMPLETE
0 * INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE
/-
1st 2nd.
1. Site access to requested tots adequate and logically grouped.
2. Site erosion control measures adequate.
3. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfere of pubfc.
4. Letter of request for partial release submitted.
5. 8 Vf X11 • site plan (attachment) showing requested tots submitted.
6. Compaction report from sons engineer submitted.
7. Engineer of Work certification of work done and pad elevations,
6. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface
conditions exist ^
9. Fire hydrants within 500 feet of building combustibles and all weather
roads access to site.
Partial release of grading for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit
issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required
pursuant to the building permit process.
Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons;
Construction Manager Date
KMDRARVlSgQWPDATAMNSPECTtFORMSVARTSnEFRM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB '
i
Address ATW
Planner Greg Fisher___
APN: ^05 -316 -
Phone (760) 602-4629
Type of Project & Use:
Zoning: ^L~\
Net Project Density:DU/AC
CFD fin/nut) #
Circle One
General Plan: gAJv\ Facilities Management Zone:
_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:
ocJ2a.
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit: )
Kin D
Legend: X Item Complete
Environmental Review Required:
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Item Incomplete - Needs your action
YES NO TYPE
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval: . '
Discretionary Action Required:
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. '
PROJECT NO.
YES } NO
DATE
TYPE S OO • 0 (j?
n °\
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES
CA Coastal Comrnission Authority? YES
NO
NO
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt);
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
\
Follow-Up Actions:
1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
[ I Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES )o NO
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 19937)
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
,71 '/"(A/P/Ds, Activity' Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
Site Plan:
-.-.. . ' .•„•-!- K- ., ,
I I I I 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements,, existing and proposed .structures, streets, existing
street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing,
topographical lines. ,-•>•
| | [~~1 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
. Zoning:
n\S 1 1 1 1 1 . Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
I I I I I | 2. Accessory structure
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Structure separation
U EH EH 3- Lot Coverage:
Required
Required
Required
Required
setbacks:
Required
Required
Required
Required
: Required
Required
%Of Shown g>0'
& ( <5"'f Shown \<rT f
Shown
'\~~~l ( Shown [Q S~ r
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
HO /<9 Shown ZtO^o
4. Height:Required - -, pO _ Shown QJ
I I 5. Parking: Spaces Required
Guest Spaces Required
I | Additional Comments P\ouroc\^,o o
p[Shown Q
Shown
K \n-Vejmoir
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTE
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
DAT
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
/
/
A
JOB NO.
DATE / "
SH. OF
AORIANA DRA6US CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL CNOINEERINQ
2661 BRK3HTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (780) 434-4087 FAX (760) 434-3367
p O JOB NO.
BY ftO
DATE /' fe>
SH. _ OF_
<2 -I-
c/2;
:wi-2.>,
ADRIANA DRAQUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD., CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH. (760) 43*4067 FAX (760)434-3367
|2 £JOB NO.
BY
DATE
DESIGN CRITERIA
Building Code : 1 997 'SSKZ-—
Foundation Soil :2000psf per soil report '^^d^^^^^^v
Concrete :2500 psi fj^^AOA^^
Concrete Block :ASTM C90.GRADE N ^ff*JQ]ri$^ '*G$W
Reinforcing Steel : ASTM A61 5-40 or A61 5-60 as noted ff**/£ •mjjji&i ^ \1z
Structural Steel :ASTMA36 [(If NO/C 04J5164 F
Pipe Column : ASTM A53,Grade B \\ £xp ^/fca/^r0
Wood Framing
Studs
Joists
Beams
Posts
GLB
Plywood
DESIGN LOADS
Lateral
Wind
Seismic
Live Loads
(psf)
Dead Loads
R/FIr Finish
Insulation
Sheathing
Jsts/ trusses IA/T
Bott.
Misc.
D.L(psf)
T.L.(psf)
IT
:DF#1 (6x),Stud Grade (4x) Y~ *t~
: 24F-V4
: P.S. 1-85 Exterior Glue
: ( Ce)( Cq)(qs)( I) 18.5 PSF
: ZICa/R 0.293
ROOF K^f <*JT FLOOR DECK
16 Trtt/54 40 60
14 M- 4 6
1.5 - 1.5
1.5 '-'3 3
• ^4.5 if.^ 3.5 3.5
3 ' -. 3 8
1.5 "" 1.5 1.5
26 IB 16.5 22
42 ^4-. 56.5 82
OG^i^rS', U''H-'&-f^ A^'sOrtw
^T^vJcTtT^%
ADRIANA ORAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENOINEERINO
2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
, D c -w
.
^ "' ^
r^ /2_
(,-3
s ~
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENQINEERINO
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
DEVICE:JOB NO.
DATE 7~ 2</-00
SH.1.0FJ7
42.1, R
pr
\fi~~
a. M
1
=
/OS/2.
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENOINEERINO
2661 BRIGHTON RO. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
JOBNO.
BY
DATE
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
p, c.
JOB NO
BY C.
DATE
\f...
12.
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
O_e<. I O! p,
'
JOB NO.
BY _
DATE
SH. A
l) •''M *'» •-
\ji/
4-*
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
O erg, C-e
pi C-
JOB NO.
BY
DATE 7' 2«f,
SH. .3. OF J "7
4-
'* "3* ""***
T
-5 ^
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING fi. &^ | o GTVl C^ 7=3=. ^ JOB NO _2_o
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING pA<^-ip>C- "
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3387
ft
A
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING fie^>| OC"U Cc p,f^ JOB NO.
•TRUCTURAL ENOINEERINO p A £-1 Pi C- BY
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 DATE 7- t^-
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367 S
V
b-=.
AT
^, ;
X /--S--
MP-* \° - flf. \P
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENQINEERINO
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
JOB NO.
DATE ~t' 1
SH. fZ- OF
I O K :
.,
* '
: *- , lf
s\-s"'Uto^.m p-^p.
U
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2861 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
. I c.£L JOB NO.
BY
DATE -
-7.i-W
fiis.0>
U
_J
ID
Q
U
XCJCO
-J
UICO
fe
a
uua
ai
n
(U
vO
in
NO
03
I918v»*
01
(U
00
j*
(U
au
in in
(U
vO
v>
(J
orI-H
P)
U
?*• ^'fc l^a oPQ
o vi
% «
« x
cu
u
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
8TRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3387
p-r*-JOB NO.
DATE 7-
SH. ^ op_r7
?/
PL,
R
•p-
P-
CO
F. -lo
' °
'. 6"
"
8 •
- 0
7.
g
6,
\fr.o-
2?.*' "O ^^
-AT
- ^T. ST
- 2.*-'
^ 2,r
3.
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3387
PA ^c
JOB NO.
BY /fr>>
DATE
/.Q
£.
ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD. CA. 92008
PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367
JOB NO.
BY
DATE
SH.
<
!,74
r i-c \<° -
'
-* H.2-
?,
4
COMMERCIAL • RESIDENTIAL
• ROOM ADDITIONS •
• COMPETITIVE PRICES*
FREE AND PROMPT ESTIMATES
Specializing in roof and
floor trusses
2847 INDUSTRY STREET
• - . .",. -'irfJ..- . '-. '• ••-.••' - .*.-• ' -• - • • ' - - ' -. •• ' ---.-,:. •".-..--v.-^-Sai-1-- :•'-.-• '-•" ••---"••?•'•-t:-.- -.' - "• --.--:-•..;•, -_.., - • •••*,.<*.':•••• ." .- •:;f§EApfroE>^GAs 92054
liioiAA-513:", .' •
(760) 722 - 7696
EAX (7^)722- 0438
5 i ~ fc ~ fc s1 i «13335-3:
§3 S
§ zi §
Ccxl^ = «ig^-gSCcu-«SBof^--*-o
^curu^oj»^^c\Jc\it~«-<c-<c\ic\Jcu^»-H-'«cxi^^rvi-^e\i
•»-« cn m «•--*•—« m c\j •»•» »-« cn •*•• co
to to H OD r*- en
^ § s S § § *i
m ro S 3 rn en rn
ss g
ci cj LU uJ co" CD co co" co ±f ni fc if
oi'^<*-i^-i-^*^— oo---« *-* cu r^ ira *•-«
dgd SU, UJ lJU UJC\J O ••-•U- UJ U- <M ^" UJ ^p>-4 _j *-» cn ^ .jo_J CD -J ^ "^T CO T3S -« -«t CM CM -^ OJcj CD cj m m CD cn
Q QD CTlcn co cn
CJ CO CJ CO t— CO H—
^_; ,-_* -aj -aj ^j ^ ^
CO t* f f*^ t^S S S t a S £ S 5E
0-.8 , . .0-,K
0-.»E
j j J
.O-.E .O-.E
CDmpulrus. IriG.
Manufacturing * Engineering • Computer Systems
WARNINGS:
1. Read all General Notes and Warnings before construction of trusses.
2. Builder and erection contractor should be advised of all General Notes and Warnings before
construction commences.
3. 1x3 compression web bracing must be installed where shown +.
4. All lateral force resisting elements such as temporary and permanent bracing, must be
designed and provided by designer of complete structure. CompuTrus assumes no responsibil-
ity for such bracing.
5. No load should be appfied to any component until after all bracing and fasteners are complete,
and at no time should any loads greater than design loads be applied to any component
6. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responsibility for the fabrication, handling,
shipment and installation of components.
7. This design is furnished subject to the limitations on truss designs set forth by the Truss Plate
institute in "Bracing Wood Trusses, HIB-91". a copy of which will be furnished by CompuTrus
upon request
GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted:
I. Design to support loads as shown. -
(2) Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be laterally braced at 2'-0" p.c. and at 12'-0" QJC,
respectively.
3. 2x4 Impact bridging or lateral bracing required where shown + +.
4. Installation of truss is the responsibility of the respective contractor.
5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for "dry
condition" of use.
6. Design assumes full bearing at all supports shown. Shim or wedge if necessary.
7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided.
8. Plates shad be located on both faces of truss, and placed so their center lines coincide with joint
center fines.
9. Digits indicate size of plate in inches.
10. For basic design values of the CompuTrus Plate, indicated by the prefix "C". see I.C.B.O. R.R.
4211
II. The CompuTrus Net Section Plate is indicated by the prefix "CN". the designator (18) indicated
18 ga. material is used. All others are 20 ga.
General Notes:
Bracing to top and bottom chords not required, provided
the chord members are braced throughout their length by
continuous sheathing.
:L I STRUCTURAL TRUSS INC
CERTIFIED INSPECTION
IN STRICT ACCORDANCE
WiTHU.B.C.2311.6
PREFABRICATED 29017
EXP. 3/31/03
in iUJ —a iu caSoV)*•*•§--"«-j — UJ11
10 10
a a
e
r\ix
fctt§§
K & yy
Vi
il i$
1
i«*IIIr-
£ • «S £«a "&Jft* .«!Ill;n*inn*
i.•- «£i|ln rs^s3" i*s?» .E*
*Sli!^i£!«cS,^
INr*>a
in i 5BI-W»•a e m mZ • •so - ni "* b .
DOC
« O »
e t u
M ** iig
lA *-m *-S IO-90-E
i
§
in
0=2
oI
s I
<0
I
1iUJ
vir
I
§
i
I
oZ111
1
CD
^O
bz
UJ_j
u.
OO
2?
5
r~
O
ili
O
Ow
inUlQ
in '
T^inCM
u.
UJa:
o>
6caD
Sin
inT-
CO
aHICO
oaoio
§o
li'in§nss
S5° 5
oT-,>£XCMCM0XCMCO
3
COMCM
•s
•S
CM
KCM
^
X
CM
XCM
7*o?CO•<f'-"9*-
KCO
*-
"9o>
CO
cn
CM
O)
.
^
0
co
co
(O
up
in
o0
CM
COCOCMCO7«-in*-
o
*-
CO
cn
co
cn
CO
s
•r--
f^
CD
T
ID
•f
in
oo
"9COoCObCO"-
b
o
7
cn
CM
b>
CO
e
r~-
•9CD
co
(O
«?m
o10cn
1CO9CMo>o7•«-
'°?o-
9co
b
cn
CO
00
co
t-
•9to
CM
CD
CM
in
o§
•7CO•vCM•9o^1•«?b
t
CO
CO
"9
CO
CM
f-
f
(O
7
CD
7
in
gCO
t^-CMCXICM1O<9b*
o
CO
CO
r-.
00
CO
CO
CO
7
CD
in
"*
o
V
*~CO7CO•90N-•«-
*
«-
cn
in
co
9cn
N-
-f*~
»
CO
in
CD
In
in
0
CO
CO
7CO7CMkcnin*-
f..
o
in
CO
CO
cn
JI
CO
CM
f-
>^CD
t
CO
tin
u.
s
«pCMI—fCMon*
o
o
CO
•r-
CO
•?•
GO
X0
CO
"9
CD
CO
CO
CO
in
O
9CM7•^COCOCD0
m
0)
00
CO
CO
CO
CO
k
CD
m
co
CM
CD
1in
O
CM
CO0>CMO7»-
«b
9at
o
01
CO
00
<
'^
in
CO
CM
<o
CM
m
X
COCO
0CMcn*-yOl*~
CO
0
CM
CO
00
<9
CO
b
Tco
t
CO
•7
in
U.
m•8•*-
tCMT»•bencno
J_
cn
•
^S-
00
CO
CO
a>
CO
•f
CD
7
CO
7-
in
X
o;_e^o"COCOTo.
o>
1-7
'"
J--
00
CM
00
«9
CO
1
CO
in
^V
X
2
OO£r-sm
«
5
•?
|
1
•oe
E
a
\
bj>
3
8
ry
\3
A
o
§
UJ
c?
mrt
inOu
1.e-X
6z
UJ
C
COS
|
o
liis
OU}
COUJo
^
CM
u.
UJex
cn6mD
CO
SoinCMCO
OUJCO
qC)iCD £S oa.1 wgs< --g •
3 «% 2^ off z
|
Q
O
§
T 0 a, inO3 --coXUiQ.O CD <• o_l — «- coa:Ul5 *° •*• S(2 — CM
S! 88§
*V
Ult
O o m in•J CM •«- CO
CO
!$ 0 aj ooK CM "* CM
U. U. U? in
CO CO CO —Q- Q. CL U' — •*-' * — Hj
_l -1 3* 0.
-J Q 5 «0
0 O^*~ 1- Ui
O
0
W
KONu_'»en
'<?
N
«9
CO
coco
2
h10\r.enj^_.en
i
""
in
f"*
T
Q
B:
toi
k
S
9orif^.n71
£
CO
CO
^"
1
*"
k.
N
b-••"•9f^.•en
9co
U
^*
en
CMt.
J
r-nITCOt-'V-J^
9co
10
CD
M
3
I
CM
•9orcrmbtftb(0
N
m
•9in
M
a
3
0
<CM
sj^.a"*CMm;_in
*9
"*
"*
T
n
|
0
i
b.'K•9.en
In
co
I"*1
n
co
CO
S
^<rCOVbb>
*"?
CO
co
t--
X
a.
D
k
«
kaCDVben
'"?
CO
CO
I-.
X
k.
<
CMrr.CD9C00
t
CO
CO
o
x
CMfc.
<CM
CMCT•«•COb-'b-|_
-
in
Vco
•^
^COz
J
CM
«9ocCOm9enbfn
N
in
in
M
X
3
•s
Va*CMin^.in
Km
*
"*
t
X
nz
0
,1
ko,*"vocV-rf>
V
**•
V
o:
CO
3
I
3
CMO*•enj^^env
^"
1
CCCO
09
5
r
9oiXVioen
—
CO
*"•
j:
(XCO
o10n-
«
KOK.J^r>en
In
CO
^~
»
ccCOZ
0a9-
S
ka>CDmjs..oen
DO
CO
eo
1
ceCO
SD
1
CMa>CDbf-.t00
V
CD
CO
j?
K
CO
Oo
2
Vcob—U)CMVin
T
—
Bu
-
::
o
coCO.
<oXCM
9COJi_^~COCM%-O
—
—
—
CM
a
a:
(0a
S
enin^*CM'*?"*
n
—
CN
Q
».
D
toinbo00•«-VCO
1
Bo
0
^*1
CM
a
M
0
enCMKOO•orr,*1O
Ken
co
•y
a
o
o
s
inin•CMen9•*
•9
CM
*-
Z
0
to
*T-100I•^'*CM•*
in
m
^o
9
CM
X
cc.
a
i
COKCM
tinVo•CD^~j:Jo
•9
m
0
9
CM
X
*
<oXCM
IO•<r«0K0^~NCO
9
m
o
o
X
8
D
0)CMKCOb*COo
en
Veo
V
X
D3
0
CDXCM
5,CO9CMCOCM^9<n
•9
o
CM
N
?O
OL
CO
1
CD
9cof^•JoCM;_m
—
fM
K
CO
M
D
Kinin*9CMbV.
-
D
in
«9
CM
ceCO
Sn
CDKCM
inmCM*—cn^~V•*
•?
CM
T
lo
V.CO
0oo
COz
KT—inV'«?'r-CM"»
•9
o
b
K
/>
ou>
D
CD
XCM
cIO<IOo9*-!pCO
9
in
o
n
CCCO
oo
CD
4
u
UJ
co
§
Oa.R
QUJ
IllCD
3
O UJz oUJ <
O 3u.0
oo
^o
5 S ? 5 SI S D 3 2
wco'l-
<te..."35
r7 UJ UJ -J —.\o ft 9- < j=^" q o S. ui
SiQ
02
l
I-O Z-
1o 8
UJa
I
^ uiuj i- u;=! < UJU. Q CC
£1 B I- ni r>: **O C 0 AS 3 • ;fcfcz in m» n min » vi ' '^ *Min i- i- -J
£°^
IO 10
°,
A
8szl
o a
v. S
(A •*•*-•I S S S *a S «i< r-
3 • _^ *s S s ~
S V in ain — *
!i
u. u. u. .Ill ,r
i
v
- 8"8 di
i
S!S! S3
V ;.
M
ULJft
K
•
«
e a i
S
IO-W-0
i
i!
s
V
k-r
t
W v ™
Isua\\,
: CO111
r ow
<o<»
in<M
O
UJ . _d < UJU. O K
UJ
CD
W
sOT
\-
Yi
ii
BC$8jgS r» •* « ni7'** •iAAii1 I I K 5\: vi 10 •"» m it> ii«8*£2!fH*••o ss;RJI?ni cvi— M niin|"iv in » ^ \sS??:INNm '^iI m Ma = ^ yo ni #11 _ -• rv m v IP «>^atnttytninrgngiM0>in<yiDK>njuJei •-inifi»trjjn^'iii'<r u SfeSm nis 10 IDia£
II
OzW-r ?;O- 2 Z CD ,
M* cSl I 3 s, *'o
ill f 3 !iSt 111 i s i v|I lii i i I g
w«s -•••* «:
I
O«0\^c
x NK rt
£
k> in e3 $ S
u1•5a.i.UJ/<\KsifIriII*t,\
4- J* ' t**\ *Ii I i 13$
I ftf' i 1SHiHIflil
tiisr & :« .5 ^R
fl=ged-,
iififllliilSl
-i CTVtfi « H^J »* *
vo(*>o
CN
(*)
i I
z *• in » B iff **•-I in ID IB u ic intfi 10 m tc in m »(\i M <M r* M M. I I I I I <
Si 8»1 Q! PJ <". £ S E 2 !9 _ _PI in iu on tfi o P* •* wi vnrt n ic & m M ru m o &1 ¥ ' ' " zririX X X X 3 XS i • I «•< (XI A WID a «a o «S m is P> 2 •* —•-* oj n m rt of ^<n ta rt A 16 w in<v n, T - ix, IN,5$ i A A 4 AB •> K I- fc- •-
1 S IP •» f»e I i i j. .^.^
g Or CU IVM ' ^» W
!B"««6
u,^ I "CS C
ss I
*
w •w « * T 35
S K K R e-8
I ^ R
Kirf .. rt
LJ (U (U tV KU) O B D DK *• tf> Bl QD ft ••* Ul |fl (O ID ID tflV) U) P> ID ID Cl <pVi IV — - OJ «>
g • H•is.0
in a 8)
I- Gs
N
I weu (V
44
IO T 3 ^
to-lo-o
?i
I!si
J.J
H5 I
fl
I?!
U*
!P£•i i itls-| ii5
H ill i! !l
I ~ ~ fi «
— in aS S JH
5
rf * ' K tftfin z i i i 6 ois--- jo".
S ., i *•*ft ^ 5 S
U CE O ^ U *• W •— OP
ff yj ^ o -* -i§ £ swfe !& ||
^ ju » <r ^ 3 5
5 3 3 fi ^S
10-W-O •5• a
ijifl!
* flS S *
I*3s1?s
Ijn,ii.Iff
«t
?f
niI
P!l*iWfli.!il!
I
Mini Hill
o\
s s
£
£ B> a2 H if!
S Y «r tA NPU in •*• *•* r* PSttj in <B in o* ' ^ N°?*P7rl "• zoo» i i «i x ni m o .Ol 0<Q •* *ij-tf 0 « es -m-M > • < Im ^ cy HI v3 f- t- »- »-« n (v5
£
?! S
Eu ae*K *" "H j «• i;iiiin B o in 3 £a S "«,«••«•«••»
M
*
§
id
V
(U
\^a
3
ii
H«u atT» »•
**ag«5««2cJB'g-g"w a Swe i-LJ ». a
I bg!6 £&
iu •» o ^ «• 33
R « a ss as
JO-lo-C
S
« D8%
-^ -2 r!
i i
all!
4
iii
i!L"il•hrpilt'-n!(i IiHiJi
o *B c
no\
rt
I S i
Q
V-
Q*
4
: S i I I*i&(5| U5 <» » fe fc1U O B 03 Ol KDO§ e m ri o o S inM O IP <a o S_1JOT rv ^ ^ ix 55, . , ,— <U 01*
a *~sis-m*jH4 Q -4 'a a z < '2 2 p O O O S ;< 5 p ^ ^ M o i' *?1 sr;
c
10
la z i i i S oZ 4 •« w« ,W4 • KSo. ni ni
s i§ i j0 g|aus;gfe
"I o1 I"b8!5 &
s -
S 4 S * **ni (-
**
< <T J J
ft*8! SIt k X o *. .. m uj u. Ikn CC u OStO ffl• •Ir-B ss»^ *-»s?
8
., i ui O
s
s
«»
i
S
M UJ Iu. S i
S ei
(M If)
Ha.H e
liii
0) W
Ul V * «• 3 5
(fi nS n ft i- a
O-
;_j(0\
^0-^4,IO-60-Q
3
giff
RJ-60-0'
1
8
'
.5
H,H!
V
s
! l«J
i !Hi
i I !i,t 1{S
!JR. fall]||||||s! |||!| |I
'teRn to|[li|Mrll|l|l|i
J«!« riw v r»'e» «2 •
ii iMMK '
|:• •=
i
S
§
<*ft8|
iiiir= j^J
S o o"-
-i 36
^1II
ui w5 uj
.*. D
3 ^ 5O O CM
U| H li.d < IUU. Q DC
§
S
(0
su>
r
te.
o
zoz
r- IX
2x4 BLOCK-ATTACHED WITH 2-16dNAILS AT EACH END -v/
f IX /TRUSSBOTTOM CHORDWlA -1
o •< <»5 coi£ <S iu
H
3 i
X
o,«*•
to «o<o
IIill
o11s?iX>
Kmu.
Ul
w
Oula.10
ui
1r»
UlM
W
b«<M9CO«COb•<M
5?
CO
s
u.
CM
*
K
9r>[MCOb•COoVCO
^CO
0>CO
•*•
U.X
»"O,
•COJo•CO9V••CO
*?
CO
m
CM
U.X
Ma>
COCOCO9V.•CO
'f
CO
o»o
«•—
u.O
CM
«_
•^«COJoCOow,•CO
*?
CO
mCM
L.
•*•»
*CO\45«•rM•io
b^
CO
M"CO
JLO
1 «ian»Jo•r)Io*rtrM_•VCOCO
n
^*o
CM
v~
U.Q
S.
b«CM9COSoCObCM
*CO
CO
•Orr>^
«o»••
u.
X
ULO•a•*-
F"
9COrMCOb•CObio
^.
CO0>m^r"
•n
u.X
u.o*osc
ioCOCO9Wrt
1?
c**
O
MvoCM
«n
u.X
u.ooas
CO!?COi?wCO
b>
CO
COM-
CMCM
^~
il_
X
UL
Otoa>-^r
CMCOHCOt•VNCO
b
«o
n
•»
CM
CD
»—
u.X
1.
?-•CM
•7CO\n•COCOV•?CO
9
«r
SHi,
CM
O
CM
U.
L.
CM
JPVCOXb1 •in*PW
•9
10
»"
N^»
«O
X
CM<t^
IOXCM
yi«vio«?Ml
V
oCM^•
«O
X
ft.
b•V•w>r>•iob_•V
b
CO«o^~
«D
X
CO«J
b_•V•ioIOCDbw
o>
COoCO
CO
o
CM«
ft•MI•CM«nVio•^*V
^Ml
U)o>
•M
r^
Q
^n«.
9in•COSoCO<obia
9
IO
a>
r^
CO
Q
H1ABTR••ioVink«D• _ia
•
•
CO
CDC
(M
O
O
CO
CO
VMf•?Vb•io•?Mf
!n
COs
CO
X
u.of>•«-^-
^WW"•W*ioH»MT
«?
•D
O>CO
•n
X
IL
OIO«&V
b<^•V••in«*)«CObCJ .V
*?
0r*>
f2
co
X
U.oo•&•»-
««r«?ioV•DUw
•
••n
CO•«CM
r>,
X
n.o•ae»-r-
9inCO•inVio9in
??
m
^
CD
X
u.oo^^~CM
h1M>^inCO•ioh1in
'•?
g
o
X
u.§
3
»"•inh1tosuia
•
_•
p
CO
X
CM«k-
H
hio«PSo?COrM•«o
Sn•f,
CO
in
X
**m
Via50ioVSoi0
kc:
CMCOo>
•>
X
co»
Vio50SB«•o1IO
kf*
B0CM
to
Q
CM•»
s?io?•DVSo«io
?
SCO
r>-
O
«-•»
^•ior-tio9•ON.••D
r"
•
ft..
0O
O
o
| I1&8TR•?w_1L«H'Soio«•0
1
•
i
at
ii
O
mS)
ioh1ID^ilktio
0
S
•*.
x.
u.
2
M«o9ioioN•to
?
COa>•a
n
I
u.SIP
Vio*?SoiNSo'TCO
k
o
S
CO
II
u.oo
*?<0«p<oV00•m•CO
a>
CO
*CN
r«.
U
u.oinOft
s«fob^*•to'fCOkCO
•«r-
«J
*O
^>
CD
II
&o
CM
3v-•ioV3•bb^•a
CM
So
g
o
IL.
is
I
VI
au
o
CO
VI
XCM
IU
• • •
utn6
I? SI °
I I
I ^2 O CM
dZ Uis S&«C Q oe
GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION
INVESTIGATION
CHESTNUT PROPERTY
APN 205-210-09-00
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA
For:
HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
JULY 26, 2000
By:
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
San Diego, CA
(Work Order 400739)
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2
3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2
4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY 3
Table A - UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters 4
5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 4
5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals 4
5.2 Existing Site Improvements 5
5.3 Grading Compliance 5
5.4 Site Preparation 5
5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment 5
5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation 6
5.7 Compacted Fill Placement 6
5.8 Soil Material Suitability 6
5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics 6
5.10 Import Soils 7
5.11 Compaction Testing 7
6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA 7
6.10 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria 7
6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation System 8
Table B - Conventional Foundation Design Parameters
6.3 Retaining Walls 8
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS cont.
Page
6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients 8
6.3.2 Other Design Considerations 9
6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems 9
6.3.4 Other Appurtenances 9
7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 9
APPENDIX:
REFERENCES
LABORATORY ANALYSES
PLATE A - UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
TABLE I - LOGS OF TEST PITS
TABLE II - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA
PLATES B-1 AND B-2 - DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA
PLATES C-1 THROUGH C-5 - CHEMICAL ANALYSES (By Others)
EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PLATES G-1 THROUGH G-11 -GRADING DETAILS
POCKET ENCLOSURE:
SHEET 1 OF 1 -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111
TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380
HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
2541 State Street - Suite 202
Carlsbad, CA 92008-1964 July 26, 2000
Work Order 400739
Attention: Mr. Bob Plein
Subject: Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the
Chestnut Property, APN 205-210-09-00,
in the City of Carlsbad, California
References: See Appendix
Gentlemen:
Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) geotechnical foundation
evaluation for the Chestnut property, APN 205-210-09-00, located in the City of
Carlsbad, California. This work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated
June 27, 2000 on the authorization of Mr. Bob Plein.
The purpose of this investigation is to generally characterize site geotechnical condi-
tions as they relate to the proposed construction of four (4) wood frame, residential
structures supported by slab-on-grade foundation systems.
1.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The following scope of work has been performed during PSE's investigation.
0 Review of published maps and geologic literature.
0 Mark-out and coordination of underground service alert.
0 Excavation, logging and sampling of three (3) exploratory test pits, exca-
vated with a John Deere 31OE backhoe with 24 inch bucket (Table I).
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY
TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 ; TEL: (909) 676-8195 TEL: (714) 730-2122
FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (909) 676-1879 FAX: (714) 730-5191
Work Order 400739 Page 2
July 26, 2000
0 Laboratory testing and analyses of bulk samples consisting of: 1) hy-
drometer analysis (Table II); 2) remolded direct shears (Table II and
Plates B-1 and B-2); 3) compaction characteristics (Table II); 4) expan-
sion index (Table II); and 5) chemical/resistivity testing (Plates C-1
through C-5).
0 General discussion of site geology.
0 Limited seismic hazards analysis.
0 Preliminary grading recommendations.
0 Preliminary foundation design recommendations.
0 Preparation of this report and accompanying exhibits summarizing our
findings, conclusions and recommendations.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The vacant 1.44 acre parcel is relatively flat with drainage by sheet flow to exist-
ing paved streets and associated storm drains. Currently the parcel supports a
strawberry farming operation. Existing homes are located to the south, east and
west. The intersection of Chestnut Avenue and Spanish Way form the north
boundary (Sheet 1).
3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
It is assumed that mass grading techniques will be utilized to create building
pads, driveways and surface drainage improvements for support of four (4) resi-
dential structures to the grades reflected on enclosed Sheet 1 of 1. It is expected
that design cut/fill volumes will entail approximately 3,400 cubic yards of material.
It is also understood that the proposed residential wood frame structures will be
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 3
July 26, 2000
supported by a slab-on-grade foundation system with shallow foundation ele-
ments. Foundation plans should be reviewed for conformance to PSE's recom-
mendations prior to construction.
4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY
Although no existing site specific proprietary geotechnical reports were available
for PSE's review, published data (Tan and Kennedy, 1996) indicates the site is
underlain by terrace deposits of the Quaternary-age Lindavista Formation. Typi-
cally, the Lindavista Formation consists of brown to reddish brown, silty to clayey
sands. Tan and Kennedy indicates Santiago Formation cropping out one-half
(0.5) of a mile southwest of the site at the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and it is likely
that Santiago bedrock underlies the site at depth.
Review of the regional geologic information indicates the absence of faulting
within/or in immediate proximity of the site. The trace of the Rose Canyon fault is
located approximately eight (8) kilometers southwest of the parcel. Owing to the
dense character of the Lindavista and underlying Santiago Formation, liquefac-
tion potential is very low. Ground shaking from large seismic events generated
along offsite faults is possible, as with most areas in the seismically active south-
ern California area. For structural design purposes, the parameters presented in
Table A should utilized for post-graded lots. The site occurs in seismic zone 4,
and therefore the seismic zone factor "Z" is 0.4. These parameters are meant to
be consistent with UBC (1997).
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
Page 4
TABLE A
UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters
Soil Profile Type Ca Cv Na Nv
Sc 0.40Na 0.56NV 1.0 1.1
Groundwater was not encountered at the time of PSE's subsurface investigation.
It is considered unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during grading op-
erations or building construction. It is possible that landscape and/or seasonal
rainwater will perch over the relatively dense, Lindavista Formation. Based on
PSE's general experience, the proposed three (3) foot cap is typically sufficient to
allow for mitigation of nuisance water conditions. However, if perched conditions
develop near finish grade surface, additional measures, such as the combination
of area drains and/or French drains, may be required.
5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION
5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals
As a general guideline, removals will likely be on the order of three (3) feet
and should be accomplished over the entire site. Localized areas may re-
quire deeper removals and will depend upon conditions encountered dur-
ing grading operations.
Removal and recompaction should be accomplished for the three backhoe
trenches (TP-1 through TP-3) excavated for this study.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 5
July 26, 2000
5.2 Existing Site Improvements
To the best of PSE's knowledge, existing underground improvements do
not exist within the proposed building envelopes. Underground utility im-
provements may exist on the site along Chestnut Avenue. Additionally,
residential structures exist on three sides of the subject lot. Given the
proximity of the adjacent structures and improvements, care should be
taken during grading operations. Accordingly, it should be the contractor's
responsibility to protect adjacent improvements in these areas during
grading and building construction.
5.3 Grading Compliance
Grading should conform to the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad
and the attached PSE earthwork specifications. Field observations will be
required during grading by qualified geotechnical personnel. This should
include full time observation and testing of fill soil placement by field tech-
nician^) and periodic observation by the soil engineer.
5.4 Site Preparation
Prior to grading, the site must be stripped and cleared of existing vegeta-
tion, trash, debris and other deleterious materials. These materials should
be removed and wasted offsite.
5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment
Once removals are completed, the removal excavations should be mois-
ture conditioned to optimum moisture or slightly above (ASTM:D 1557-91)
and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, prior to
placement of compacted fill.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 6
July 26, 2000
5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation
Where design grades and/or remedial grading creates a cut/fill transition
on a building pad, the cut and shallow fill portions of the pad shall be
overexcavated to provide a minimum compacted fill thickness of three (3)
feet. Additionally, the undercut shall slope away from the pad a minimum
of one (1) percent toward deeper fill areas in order to mitigate perching of
subsurface water.
5.7 Compacted Fill Placement
Fill should be spread in thin lifts (six to eight inches), the moisture content
adjusted to a minimum of optimum moisture or slightly above, and the
materials rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory
maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM:D 1557-91.
Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades
are achieved.
5.8 Soil Material Suitability
Excavated materials, which are approved by the soil engineer, may be
utilized in compacted fill provided that trash, vegetation and other deleteri-
ous materials are removed prior to placement.
5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics
The onsite materials are considered to be low expansive in nature. Pre-
liminary foundation designs are provided to accommodate this condition.
However, as-graded expansive conditions should be confirmed upon
completion of grading operations.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 7
July 26, 2000
5.10 Import Soils
Import soils, if needed, should have very low to low expansion properties.
The soil engineer should be notified at least 48 hours in advance in order
to sample, test and approve or disapprove materials from borrow sites.
No import materials should be delivered for use on the site without prior
approval by the soil engineer.
5.11 Compaction Testing
Fill should be tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the required
compaction is achieved.
6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA
Laboratory testing indicates the existence of onsite materials that are low in ex-
pansion potential. Final expansion potential determinations for the subject lots
will be dependent on the post-graded soil conditions. For preliminary design
purposes, the following conventional slab-on-grade foundation design parame-
ters and recommendations are presented.
Prior to construction, the foundation plans should be reviewed by PSE. At that
time, finalized recommendations/comments will be presented.
6.1 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria
Foundation systems may be preliminarily designed based upon the fol-
lowing values.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 8
July 26, 2000
Allowable Bearing: 2000 Ibs./sq.ft.
Lateral Bearing: 200 Ibs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches
plus 100 Ibs./sq.ft. for each additional
12 inches embedment to a maximum of
2000 Ibs./sq.ft.
Sliding Coefficient: 0.35
Settlement: Total = 3/4 inch
Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet
The above values may be increased as allowed by code to resist transient
loading conditions, such as wind or seismic.
6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation Systems
Conventional foundation systems may be preliminarily designed in accor-
dance with section 6.1 and Table B.
6.3 Retaining Walls
Foundations with retaining walls may be preliminarily designed in accor-
dance with recommendations of paragraph 6.1 and the following:
6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients
Level Backfill
Ka = 0.31
Kp = 3.25
K0 = 0.47
Equivalent fluid pressures can be calculated utilizing a soil unit
weight of y= 125 Ibs./ft.3.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
TABLE B
CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS
Expansion Potential
Soil Category
Very Low to Low
I
Footinq Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Finish Grade
One-Story Interior
One-Story Exterior
Two-Story Interior
Two-Story Exterior
12 inches
12 inches
12 inches
18 inches
Footinq Width
One-Story
Two-Story
Footing Reinforcement
One-Story
Two-Story
Slab Thickness
Slab Reinforcement
Under-Slab Requirement
Slab Subarade Moisture
12 inches
15 inches
Two No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom.
Two No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom.
4 inches (actual)
No. 3 rebar spaced 18 inches on center, each way.
2 inches of clean sand over 10-mil Visqueen, underlain with 2 inches
of clean sand.
Minimum of 110 percent of optimum moisture prior to placing con-
crete.
Footinq Embedment Next to Swales and Slopes
If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five (5) feet horizontally of the swale, the
footing should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings
adjacent to slopes should be embedded such that at least seven (7) feet is provided horizontally from edge of
the footing to the face of the slope.
Garaqes
A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage en-
trance, tying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade
beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated
by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the
thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as
the structure. Slab thickness, reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 9
July 26, 2000
6.3.2 Other Design Considerations
Retaining wall design should consider additional surcharge loads,
where appropriate.
6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems
Cantilever and/or restrained retaining walls should be waterproofed
to accommodate the anticipated irrigation water and backfilled with
free draining material (SE > 30) to within 18 inches of grade and
compacted to project specifications to minimize water marks. Na-
tive soils shall be utilized in the upper 18 inches. Drainage systems
including, as a minimum, a four (4) inch diameter perforated drain
line surrounded by three (3) cubic feet per lineal foot of three-
quarters (3/4) inch to one (1) inch crushed rock wrapped with a
suitable filter fabric, should be provided to all cantilever and re-
strained retaining walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure.
6.3.4 Other Appurtenances
PSE can provide geotechnical design parameters and subsurface
drainage recommendations for pools, spas, flatwork or other hard-
scape improvements upon request.
7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
7.1 Positive drainage away from structures shall be provided and maintained.
7.2 Utility trench backfill shall be accomplished in accordance with the pre-
vailing criteria of the City of Carlsbad.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739 Page 10
July 26, 2000
7.3 Seismic design should be based on current and applicable building code
requirements.
7.4 Soluble sulfate concentrations of the foundation material should be deter-
mined after grading is complete, when the final distribution of onsite mate-
rial is known. Preliminary chemical analyses are presented on Plates C-1
through C-5. Specific recommendations with respect to concrete specifi-
cations and cathodic protection should be determined by a corrosion engi-
neer.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
Page 11
The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the
specific excavations and observations as noted. The materials immediately adja-
cent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics and no rep-
resentations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed.
Respectfully submi
PACIFIC
CA1VIERON
Civil Engineer
JObrN A. HANSON, CEG 990
Vice President
<. CHANEY, GE ?314
Bering Manager
Dist: (6) Addressee
CER/JAC/J AH: KR/0000
CERTIFIED
ENGINEERING
GEOLOGIST
EXP. 1/31/01
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
APPENDIX
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
REFERENCES
ICBO, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California: International Conference of
Building Officials, 3 volumes.
Tan, S. S., and Kennedy, M. P., 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestern part of San
Diego County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, open file re-
port 96-02.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAJOR DIVISIONS f*
J
ill 1
•sis |
i 2
i *tn
"
i !
i 1£ o
fe <"
J2 | <p
</5 'w
•o • .,
i *
i ££ t-
Si * J>? :°°i*l* r|j lie 1
Jllj !I Jff,||
*~ *£ o 1 ° &
fi" . v
0 _ w
«!|JU "~* ::flIl"P f.M:
eg* fi? || I. 5^
r'
— c
? -siO 3
J
og- 81 II1 1*
•! j 8 ?
^7
sf
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ?
OUPMBOLS
0 .
.0 GWr<
1 GP
\n
|GC
sw
:SP
*
•SM
^SC
ML
/
/CL
- rtiUL
MH
^ W/
/i OH
S= PI
TYPICAL NAMES
Well -graded grovels, grove sand matures,
little or no fines
Poorly-graded grovels, grovel-sand miitures,
little or no fines
Silty gravels, grovel-sond-silt mixtures
Clayey grovels, grovel-sand-silt miitures
Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or
no fines
Poorly - graded sands, gravelly sands, little or
no fines
Silty sands, sand-silt miitures
Clayey sands, sand-clay miitures
Inorganic silts and fine sands, rock flour
silty or clayey fine sands or clayey
silts with slight plasticity
horgarac cloys of bw to medium plasticity,
gravelly clays, sandy cbys, silty clays, lean cloys
Organic sRts ond organic silty clays of
tow plasticity
Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomoceous
fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts
Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat cloys
Organic cloys of medium
organic silts
to high plasticity,
Peat ond other highly organic soils
FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Wide range grain sizes ond substantial amounts of all
intermediate particle sizes
Predominately one size or a range of sizes with some
inter roediate sizes missing
Nonplastic fines or fines with tow plasticity (far identi-
proceduret see ML below)
Plastic tines (for identification procedures see CL below)
Wide range n groin sizes and substantial amounts of
all intermediate particle sizes
Predominately one size or o range of
some intermediate sizes missing
sizes with
Nonplastic fines or fines with tow plasticity
(for identification procedures see ML below)
Plastic fines (for identification procedures see CL below)
IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES
on fraction smaller than No 40 sieve size
Dry Strength
( crushing
characteristics)
None to slight
Medium to high
Slight tomedium
Slight to
medium
High to very
high
Medium to high
Oilotoncy
(reaction to
shaking )
Quick to stow
None to veryslow
Stow
Stow to none
Nona
None to verystow
Readily Identified by color, odor
ond frequently by fibrous teiture
Toughness
(consistencyneor PL)
None
Medium
Slight tomedium
Slight to
medium
High
Sight to
medium
spongy, feel
BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS Saris possessing cnorocttmtttt of two a/cups are designated by combnotwns of group lymbolt.
PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS
SILT OR CLAY
SAND
FINE 1 MEOUM COARSE
GRAVEL
FINE 1 COARSE
1
• COBBLES 1ii
BOULDERS
No 2OO No 4O No 10 No4 V4 in 3* (12 irO
US STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION
GRANULAR SOIL COHESIVE SOIL BEDROCK MOISTURE CONPITIQN. OJH£R_
Very loose Very soft
Loose Soft
Moderately dense Firm
Medium dense Stiff
Dense Very stiff
Very dense Hard
Thi United Sail Oooincotion Sy«Hm, Corn ofbigjnnn, US. Army VaY.cH Memorandum No 3 '157,
Vbkjrm 1, Moren, 1953 UMMd April, I960)
SYMBOLS
Dry R- Undisturbed sample
Slightly moist B- Bulk sample
Soft Moist 2 Groundwater
Moderately honJ Wet £ Groundwater seepage
Hard Saturated
Very hard
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PLATE A
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
Work Order 400739
Date Excavated 06/27/00
Excavated by CR
Equipment John Deere 31OE w/ 24" Bucket
TABLE I
LOG OF TEST PITS
Test
Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description
TP-1 0.0-8.0 SM TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): light brown silty,
fine to medium sand, dry, moderately dense;
common rootlets; visible pores to 1mm; un-
common krotovina.
@ 2.0 ft. red brown; uncommon rootlets; no
krotovina; medium dense, moist; uncommon
pinhole porosity; massive.
@ 3.5 ft. medium dense to dense, moist to very
moist.
TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT.
NO WATER, NO CAVING
TP-2 0.0 - 3.0 SM TOPSOIL : dark brown silty, fine to medium
sand, moderately dense, moist to very moist;
common rootlets.
3.0-7.0 SM TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): red brown silty, fine
to medium sand, medium dense, moist to very
moist; massive.
TOTAL DEPTH 15.0 FT.
NO WATER, NO CAVING
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
TABLE I cont.
LOG OF TEST PITS
Test
Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description
TP-3 0.0-7.0 SM TERRACE DEPOSIT (CM): light brown silty,
fine to medium sand, dry, moderately dense to
medium dense; uncommon rootlets; visible
pinhole porosity.
@ 2.0 ft. red brown silty, fine to medium sand,
moist, medium dense; massive.
@ 5.0 ft. red brown.
TOTAL 7.0 FT.
NO WATER, NO CAVING
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Work Order 400739
July 26, 2000
LABORATORY ANALYSES
The following laboratory tests were performed on representative samples in accordance
with the latest standards from the ASTM and the Uniform Building Code (UBC).
Compaction Characteristics
Laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content determinations were made
in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557 utilizing the bulk samples obtained from
representative soils and bedrock types to determine their compaction characteristics.
Results of these tests are presented in Table II.
Direct Shear Determinations
Direct shear tests were performed on "undisturbed" samples and samples which were
remolded to 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density in accordance with ASTM:D
3080. Prior to testing, the samples were inundated under confinement for approxi-
mately 24 hours. Tests were made under various normal loads at a constant rate of
strain of 0.05-inch per minute. Shear test data is presented in Table II, Plate B-1 and
Plate B-2.
Swell Tests
Expansion characteristics were determined in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2.
The results are presented in Table II.
Hydrometer Analyses
Hydrometer grain size analyses were performed on the minus No. 10 sieve portion of
the samples in accordance with ASTM:D 422. These tests were used as an aid in soil
classification. The results of these tests are shown on Table II.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
_ O
u.O
2ID
OTMn5Kz «QUjUJhoo:«zo"• 9.zv) u7UJ </}l"-8I •?rsXciSUJT-SQ02SmX 3UJ
us:sig0 «
C1
1"E•o
S1??
EWl
!So_
S = |S!u.gm
UJ(/) QSIS8"
?".>-3°ui2.O.ZM
zuj 2UJ P
(3 o S ^s §n
= P1- 3 UJ ^~
««££.S5§
s"
^luTwSzyz
Q5t— o
EUJ|-^KZ
i = |ii^p«z£o-OOOEU
Stfi-11^i°
^oif
0$,DESCRIPTION-J
8
EESjUl
Qt
Uza:s
Es«onoo
C4
0
00
O-
o
o
ft
O)
u>a>CM
Etn
ty Sand (Qt)£5
u>
^D.1-
EO(Mno^
CO
CM
R
-
O
0
CO
*s
Etn
Sand (Topsoil)*«
,
M
fc
0)
CUJ
JO
'o(0
orea.
DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
REMOLDED @ 90%
^uu
1 OCA
,uuu
CN
,ouuH._
vjCO " ~
LJJ " ~ _ _ _ _
CO
rv -^ -i *7Kn - -- - -< 1,/oU -
LJJ ~ ~ _____
Trt
IjOUU
j OCO\ ,^OU
-j nnn . --t ,uuu
fjcr\( Ow
-4 1--1 r
cnnOUU
f)cr\AOU
1
1
•_ _ _ _
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2
Silty Sand (Qt)
SM
symbol boring depth (ft.) symbol boring depth (ft.)
• TP-1 5.0
w
COHESION 0 psf.
FRICTION ANGLE 33 degrees
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
5SB PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
2JW 7715 Convoy Court, S.D.CA 921 11
S9J (619)560-1713
-Sill W.0. 400739 PLATE B-1
DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
REMOLDED @ 90%
3 7cn - - -you
,OUU
3 ocn -- - - -,zou
,uuu
2 VRn - -, / ou
CM '- - - -
2 cnn --^ ,OUU _
</> _ _ _ - _.Q -_ _ _ _— o osn - - - -.,. z.zou _ _ _
111fy* n nnn -,t 2.UUU
ry __ _ _ _ -__••b H vKn _ _ _ _ _<C 1 , f OUtil I_ _ I IX - - - -
^ cnnl,oUU —
4 OKH -1 ,ZOU
•i nnn -I,UUU
yen _ ' f/ ou
- m-
cnn -ouu
ocn -^ou
0 : ::__: — i : :
: " '!::::::
j » _ __
^ ^
~~ r " -_-
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2
Silty Sand (Topsoil)
SM
symbol boring depth (ft.) symbol boring depth (ft.)
• TP-2 1.0
W.n
COHESION 0 psf.
FRICTION ANGLE 32 degrees
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
5BH PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
~J« 771 5 Convoy Court, S.D. CA 921 1 1
^91 (619)560-1713
Sail W.0. 400739 PLATE B-2
07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046
Del Mar Analytical
2652 Alion AVQ., Irvine. CA 92606
101-1 £. Coolsy Dr., Suile A, CoHon. CA 92324
16S25 Sherman Way, Sulle C-11, van Nuy;, CA32«06
9461 Ctra::.ipoake Or., Sulie 80S, San Diogo. CA S212S
9630 South 513! St.. Sulie 8-120, Phoenix, A2 B5011
(»«0 ?61-1022 FAX (943) 261-1WS
(509) 370-^687 FAX (909) 370-1016
(618) 779-18W FAX (818) 779-1fl«
(61B) 605-9596 FAX (619! 505-860S
(ABO] 755.0043 FAX (180) 785-0851
LABORATORY REPORT
Prepared For:Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.
Tl\ 5 Convoy Court
Sun Diego, CA 92 111
Attention Ron Buckley
Project 400739
Sampled: 06/27/00
Received: 06/30/00
Reported: 07/12/00
TTiliy laboratory report is confide Vial and is intended for the sole use of
Del Mar Analytical and ils cue -•-Uent. This enti-e report was reviewed and approved for release.
CA ELAP Certificate #1169
AZ DHS L.cense #AZ0062
1 Mar Analytical, Colton
'eanne Shoulder
Project Manager
n«only Iolhe sample icxej inlhchborolcry. Thlirepun .>•hull not tc reproduced, mctpl in
full, *ilhouivritk!np<!rm:sslon from Del Mar Analytical.
Plate C-1
CJF0401 < 1 of S>
07/12/00 WED 15:19 KAA yuajyuiU4b
Del Mar Analytical
26S2AllonAve.. livlnc. CA 92606 (949) 261-10ZZ FAX (949) 261.1 J26
10lt E. Ccoloy Dr., Suite A, Colion. CA9Z324 (909) 370-1667 FAX (90.1) 370-1016
16525 Sherman Way. Sufte C-n. Van Nuvs. CA 8240C (8IB) 77B-1M4 FAX (618) 776-1843
9404 Chesapeake Dr. Sulic «05, San Diego. CA 921J3 (61B) 505-9596 FAX (619) 505-9669
9830 Soolli 51xi Si,, Suite B-120, Plioanix, A2 85011 (480) 785-0013 FAX (480) 765-0851
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.
77) 5 Convoy Court
San Diego, CA 921II
Attention: Ron Buckley
Client Project ID: 400739
Report Number CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00
Received: 06/30/00
Analyte
INORGANICS
Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data
Method Batch Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers
Sample ID: C.TF0401-01 (TP-1@5' - Soil)
pH £PA
mg/kg
Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@5' - Soil)
Chloride EPA 300.0 IOG054:: 5.0
Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@S( - Soil)
Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. 10G1035: 700
pH Units pH Units
10GOG3<; NA 7.8 1 7/6/00 7/6/00
mg/kg
15 1 7/5/00 7/5/00
€ hms/cm ohms/cm
3200 10 7/10/00 7/10/00
H
Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@S' - Soil)
Soluble Sulfatc EPA 300.0 IOG054;. 0.00050
Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil)
pH Units
j)H EPA9045C IOG063C NA
mg/kg
Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil)
Chloride EPA 300.0 IOG0542 5.0
0.0058
pH Units
7.5
mg/kg
15
7/5/00 7/5/00
7/6/00 7/6/00
7/5/00 7/5/00
H
Del Mar Analytical, Colton
Jeanne Shoulder
Project Manager
T)ie rtsultspiriuin nnfy to the lamplei Kdeil in the l.iboratoiy. This rtpurt shall not bt rtpioductd. except in
full, vinhoia -arilten perm, sskm from Del Mar Analytical,
Plate C-2
CJF040K2 of S>
07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046
Del Mar Analytical
28S2 Alton Ave.. Irvine. CA 92606
1014 E. Cooley Dr.. Suile A, Colwn. CAS232*
16525 SMirmon Way. Suite C-n, Van Nuys, CA S240G
9484 Choaapeake Dr.. Suiio 805, San Diegc. CA 92123
9830 Soutn 51si Si.. Suite 6-120, Phobnix, AZ 65014
IgJ UUJ
(943) 261-1022 FAX (94D) 261-1220
(909) 370-4667 FAX (909! 370-1 (MG
(616) 779-1ft4J FAX (818) 779-1S43
(619) SOS-9596 FAX (619) M5-9689
(480) 765-0043 FAX (4BO) 765-0851
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.
7715 Convoy Court
San Diego, CA 92111
Attention: Ron Buckley
Client Project ID: 400739
Report Numbc::: CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00
Received: 06/30/00
Analytc
INORGANICS
Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data
Method Batch Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers
Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil)
uhms/cm
Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOG103S 700
ohms/cm
3100 10 7/10/00 7/10/00
Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@V - Soil)
Soluble Sulfate EPA 300.0 IOG054:1. 0.00050 0.0048 1 7/5/00 7/5/00
Del Mar Analytical, Colton
Jeanne Shoulder
Project Manager
e results pertain only mihc xampla lined in iha laboratory. Tliis report thall not bt reproduced, except in
full, without written perm sskinjrom Oet Mar Analytical.
Plate C-3
CJF040K3 of $>
07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046
Del Mar Analytical
2852 Allan Ave.. Irvine. CA 98806
1011 E. Cooley Dr., Suite A, Collon. CA 02321
16525 Sherman Way, Suite C-11, Van Nuys. CA B240C
91S4 Ches.-ipooke Of., Suits 605, San Diego. CA 92123
9830 South S1s( SI.. Suiir B-120. Pnoenii, AZ BSD**
Ig) UU4
1946) 2G1.1022 FAX (949) 2K1. 1226
(909) 370-1667 FAX (909) 370-1046
(818) 778-1644 FAX (818) 776-1843
(619) 505-9590 FAX (619) S05-9C89
(480) 785-0043 FAX (480) 780-0651
Pacific Soils Engineering,
771 5 Convoy Court
SanDiego,CA92111
Attention: Ron Buckley
Analyte
Batch: IOC0542 Extracted:
Blank Analyzed: 07/05/00 (I0(
Chloride
Soluble Sulfste
LCS Analyzed: 07/05/00 (IOG(
Chloride
Soluble Sulftie
Matrix Spike Analyzed: 07/05/
Chloride
Soluble Sulfctc
Matrix Spike Dup Analyzed: 0
Chloride
Soluble Sultstc
Batch: TOG0636 Extracted:
Duplicate Analyzed: 07/06/00
PH
Batch: IOG1038 Extracted:
Duplicate Analyzed: 07/10/00
Resistivity
nc.
I8B
Result
07/05/00
0542-BLIO)
ND
ND
542-BS1)
45.7
0.00975
)0 (IOG0542-MS1)
513
0.0128
Client Project IE: 400739
o -XT i. /-TT^AI Sampled: 06/27/00Report Number; CJF04Q1 Received: 06/30/00
S^MfttiSSt^fifeJEHraH MBflB^ffiKBPSSSSlrailB^BMKBBll
INORGANICS
Reporting Spike Source %R£C RPD Data
Limit Uilts Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifiers
5.0 nig/kg
0.00050 %
5.0 nig/kg 50.0 91.4 90-110
0.00050 % 0.0100 97.5 00-110
Source: JJF1020-02
5.0 ng/kg 50.0 ND 100 80-120
0.00050 % 0.0)00 0.0026 102 80-120
f/05/00 (IOG0542-MSD1) Source: IJF1020-02
52.9 5,0 Trg/kg 50.0 ND 99,4 80-120 0.753 20
0.0128
07/06/00
IOG0636-DUP1)
7.80
07/10/00
(IOC1038-DUP1)
3050
, 0.00050 % 0.0100 0.0026 102 80-120 0 20
Source: CJF0401 -01
NA pll Unite 7.8 OS
Source: 1JGOO 15-01
700 ohr«/cm 3000 1.65 20
Del Mar Analytical, Colton
Jeanne Shoulder
* Project Manager
7Vio raults ptrialn only luikexampla Ittted Inlhcl ihnruiary. Tills report ahull not be rcpKHtuctcl. except in
full, wlihoul vriitcnpcrm.sston/rom Del Mar Analytical.
Plate C-4
CJF040K4 of S>
07/12/00 WED 15:20 FAX 9093701046
Del MarAnaiytica
2652 Alton fine., Irvine, CA 92606
1014 E. Cool«y Dr., Suite A. Collon, CA 82324
76525 Shnrroan Way, Suite C-11, vRn Nuye, CA 92*06
9484 Chesapeake Dr., Sur'io BOS, San Diego, CA oaija
0830 Souln Slsi Si., Suite 6-120, Pliocnlx, a2 85014
IfcJ UUO
(9t9) 261-1022 FAX (WO) 261-1220
(900) 370-46B7 FAX (909) 370-10^G
(616) 779-1644 PAX (818) 779-1JW3
(618) EOO'0.506 FAX (619) 500-9663
(«0) V85-OW3 FAX (480) r&S-OB51
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.
7715 Convoy Court
San Diego, CA 92111
Attention: Ron Buckley
Client Project ID: 400739
ReponNumber-: CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00
Received: 06/30/00
H
ND
NR
RPD
DATA QUALIFIERS AND DEFINITIONS
Sample analysis performed past method-specified holdng time.
Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit or MDL, if MDL is specified.
Not reported.
Relative Percent Difference
Del Mar Analytical, Colton
Jeanne Shoulder
Project Manager
The mults pertain i/nly 10 ihtiamptes tested in ihc laboratory. This rtpari shall not be reproduced, except in
full, vithout writtenpcrm.ssion from Del Mar Analytical.
Plate C-5
CJF0401 < 5 of 5>
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
These specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements
for the development of the project. These specifications shall be the project guidelines for
earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading
plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling agency.
I. GENERAL
A. The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork
in accordance with the project plans and specifications.
B. The project Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall
provide testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the
project.
C. All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be
accomplished by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer.
D. It is the Contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fills
to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact the
fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil Engineer.
The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil Engineer to be
unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill.
E. The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle
the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down
temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills.
II. SITE PREPARATION
A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as
required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials
determined by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted
fills shall be removed and wasted from the site. Where applicable, the Contractor
may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for the
project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in
designated areas onsite.
After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials
deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as
recommended by the Soil Engineer/Engineering Geologist.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Earthwork Specifications
Page 2
B. After the removals as delineated in Item II, A above, the exposed surfaces shall be
disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. The
prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture condition,
mixed as required, and compacted and tested as specified. In areas where it is
necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to placing fill, it
will be the contractor's responsibility to notify the proper authorities.
C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels,
septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be
removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer and/or the
controlling agency for the project.
m. COMPACTED FILLS
A. Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill,
provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer.
Deleterious material not disposed of during clearing or demolition shall be
removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer.
B. Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be
utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the
distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer.
C. Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken offsite, or
placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas
designated as suitable for rock disposal.
D. All fills, including onsite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in
the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved
prior to importation.
E. The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compacted
shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be
thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture condition
and a uniform blend of materials.
All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as
determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture
content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary
compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction
cannot be attained.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Earthwork Specifications
Page 3
F. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below the limit specified by the
Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blended until a
uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved. Where the moisture
content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill
materials shall be aerated by discing, blading or other satisfactory methods until the
moisture content is within the limits specified.
G. Each fill layer shall be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance
with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in
accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer.
In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer to the contrary,
the compaction standard shall be ASTM:D 1557-91.
H. Where a slope receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to one-vertical, the
fill shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, alluvium,
or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, in accordance with the
recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer.
I. Side hill fills shall have a minimum key width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm
materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil
Engineer in the field.
J. Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with
the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the
recommendations of the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist.
K. The contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative
compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization
fills as directed by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing agency for the project.
This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the
compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable
equipment, or by any other procedure which produces the designated result.
L. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or creep
material into rock or firm material; and the transition shall be stripped of all soil or
unsuitable materials prior to placing fill.
The cut portion should be made and evaluated by the Engineering Geologist prior
to placement of fill above.
M. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer.
Finished surfaces of these pads may require scarification and recompaction.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Earthwork Specifications
Page 4
IV. CUT SLOPES
A. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes and shall be notified by the
Contractor when cut slopes are started.
B. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse
geologic conditions are encountered, the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer
shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to treat these problems.
C. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face
the same direction as the prevailing drainage.
D. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes shall be
excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling
governmental agencies.
E. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the
" controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the
recommendations of the Soil Engineer or Engineering Geologist.
V. GRADING CONTROL
A. Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer and/or his representative
during the progress of grading.
Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to
evaluate the compaction and moisture compliance of each layer of fill. Density
tests shall be performed at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height. Where
sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches.
Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the
disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative.
B. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is
below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the
particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or
moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed over an area
until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and
moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer.
C. Where the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed
until field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture content
and density of the fill are within the limits previously specified.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Earthwork Specifications
Page 5
D. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain
good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial
measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded area until such
time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed.
E. Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling
and compacting operations in order that he will be able to state in his opinion all
cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved specifications.
F. After completion of grading and after the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist
have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be submitted. No
further excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior notification of the
Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist.
IV. SLOPE PROTECTION
All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted and/or protected from erosion in accordance
with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL
TYPE A
PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL
NATURAL GROUND
COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE)
TYPICAL BENCHING
BEDROCK
SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "A"(PLATE G-2)
NOTE FIN A L 2O OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON - PER FOR A TED
TYPE B
PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL
NATURAL GROUND
COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE)
TYPICAL BENCHING
71V/ w<
BEDROCK
SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "8"(PLATE G-2 )
NOTE.-FINAL 2O OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED
PLATE C'/
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
W. 0. DATE
6 IN. MIN
CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS
ALTERNATE I
PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL
FILTER MATERIAL MIN.VOL. OF9FT. /LIN.FT.
6 IN. 9 ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED
SUBSTITUTE WITH UIN. 8 PERf" ,1/4 IN 0
PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF Of
PIPE.
ASTM DZrSI.SDR 350R ASTM D3O34, SDR 35 OR
AST_M DISZr, SCHD.4O ASTM DI78S, SCHD.40
12 IN. MIN.
6 IN. MIN 6 IN MIN
A'I ASTM D27SI,SDR3SOR ASTM D3O34, SDR 35 OR B~l
FOR CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF5OO FEET USE 8 IN. € PIPE
6 IN. MIN.^\
A-2
ALTERNATE 2
FILTER MATERIAL WRAPPED IN FABRIC
I IN. MAX. GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC
I IN. MAX.GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 9 FT. /FT.
MIRAFI I4O FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT
(TYPICAL)
6 IN. MIN.
/OVERLAP
B-2
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
DETAIL OF CANYON
SUBDRAIN TERMINAL
FOR ALTERNATES
A2 AND B2'
NATIVE BACKFILL
MIRAFI KO FILTER FABRIC OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT
I IN MAX. OPEN GRADED
GRAVEL OR APPROVED
EQUIVALENT
NON-PERF PERF 6 IN.
6 IN.0 MIN gMIN PIPE
6 IN. MIN
OVERLAP
ALTERNATEJ
PERFORATED PIPE SURROUNDED
WITH FILTER MATERIAL
6 IN MIN COVER
4 IN. MIN.BEDDING
FILTER MATERIAL 9 FT /FT.'&f$S% ' >'•''.*. \ r - .- w. •
6 IN. MIN
OVERLAP
-4 IN. MIN
BEDDING
A-3 PERFORATED PIPE 6 IN. f MIN. ~B-3
FILTER MATERIAL
SIEVE SIZE
UN.
3/4 IN.
3/8 INNO. 4
NO. 8
N0.30
NO. 50
NO. SOO
PERCENT PASSING
IOO
90-IOO
4O-IOO
2S-40
18-33
5-15
O-7
0-3
PLATE 6-2
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING INC,
W.O. DATE
^
e*
*t
\0M*.,*.«i*O-f)*• N_V. w"» -t!o 5.4. o$2._ o>a ^*^0 g>« C\—>\\\\\\
^. R-
o5
8«»O?i
£
*io'&^*'S5^«^»,
^Ss^-
*S*81.1
II-.
g^«5? I
ka?S**J **!e
tOJ
V .** Q<z
1
id<2
0><0 «•§
1^ 55MR^0.6 5
•* «l
la5
o
I
S
ADJ5CO-j
Oto
O
Cut Lot
••?.rff<Unweothered Bedrock
•Overexcovate ond
Recompocl
Cut-Fill Lot (Transition)
5 min.
Compocled Fill W/////////////////3 min.
N •^Overexcavate and
Recompoct
Unweothered Bedrock
*deeper overexcovotion may be
required by the soils engineer
in steep cut-fill transition areas
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC.
W. 0. DATE
PL-ATE 6-4
Kit
LU
J-oz
UJ
<Jco>scoo
T)
0)
>13
<rUJUJ2OCO_j
o
CO
ou.
UJg
c>
Selective Grading Detail for Stabilization Fill
Unstable Material Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope
min.Finished Ground
Unweothered Bedrock
or approved material
If recommended by the soils engineer/geologist, theremoiningcut portion of the slope may require removal and replacement
with compacted fill
NOTE-'
I. Subdrains are not required unless specified.
2. "w" shall be equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For
slopes greater than 25 feet "w" shall be Determined by the project soils
engineer/geologist. At no time shall "w" be less than H/2.
PLATE G-7
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
W.O.
1
•S
CDifci
o*a!
CO
O
§Q:
UJ
kl5C
6O
QQICD
oQ.
OO
io*^
Io
o>
o
8?
5
ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL
FINISH GRADE
CLEAR AREA FOR FOUNDATIONS,
UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS 10' or as described by report
ce>
FINISH SLOPE FACE
'—' WINDROW
1 (TYPICAL)
NOTE: IF NECESSARY, OVERSIZED MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED
FROM THE 15 FOOT ZONE WITH SPECIAL EOUIPMENTfSUCH
AS A ROCK RAKE PRIOR TO PLACING THE NEXT FILL LIFT.
TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (END VIEW)
HORIZONTALLY PLACED
COMPACTED FILL
GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED,
TO FILL VOIDS
NOTE: COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE BROUGHT UP AT A HIGHER ELEVATION ALONG WINDROW
SOGRANULAR SOIL CAN BE FLOODED IN A "TRENCH CONDITION".
PROFILE VIEW
PLATE G-IO
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING,INC.
W.O. DATE
£ g1IS§
t>«>
<-> 5k C tgilt*e
fc2
Uj
I-
o
63.UjC5s
136V)
i
AUG-14-2001 TUE 09:11 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 12
of Carlsbad
Building Department
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
Project Name: CHESTNUT HOMES __
Building Permit
Plan Check Number:
Project Address:
A.P.N.:
Project Applicant
(Owner Name):
Project Description:
Building Type:
Residential:
CB004802
1355 CHESTNUT AVENUE
205-210-09
CHESTNUT HOMES LLC
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
WOOD FRAME
Number of New Dwelling Units^
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 3219 SF
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU
Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area
Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area
City Certification of
Applicant Information:
S WITHIN THE
Carlsbad Unified School District
801 Pine Ave. XXXX
Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291)
San Marcos Unified School District
215MataWay
San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200)
uldtl Sihuul DlSffict
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300)
San Dieguito Union High School District
710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491)
Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the
information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended
certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and
that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
authorized to sign on behalf of ttie Owns*.
\ A. V Date:Signature:
1 635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 32008-7314 - (760) 6O2-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560
Revised 4/20/00
•z*-tSo
S 2
S §
5 5
§ 1 o
QDDD
-
DC«•
iUl
S
S 1 I I i
DDDDn
CO
Q I
3 %
8 8 8
s §
S i < aD 2 CQ
DDD
ll
LU =