The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1345 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB004801; Permit,09-10-2001 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No:CB004801 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1345 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Lot #: 0 $280,359.50 Construction Type: VN 6 Reference #: 1 Structure Type: SFD 5 Bathrooms: 4 NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SFD 3219 SF.GAR 600 SF.COV ENTRY 164 SF Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check*: Applicant: PLEIN BOB 202 2541 STATE STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008 760-729-7964 Owner: ISSUED 12/19/2000 JM 09/10/2001 09/10/2001 Total Fees: $25,930.18 Total Payments To Date: $815.48 Balance Due: $25,114.70 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFMFee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,254.58 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $815.48 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $28.04 PFF $1,755.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $2,400.00 Housing InLieu Fee D5/8 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $80.00 $1,871.00 $0.00 $5,102.54 $4,710.04 $0.00 $0.00 $432.00 $488.00 $0.00 $203.00 $60.00 $63.50 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $1,959.00 $193.00 $25,930.18 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy ' changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. IW&& Plan Ck. Deposit.;,, Q I.5/ Validated Date / / Address (include Bldg/Suite Business Name (at this addressfe? I1? /I 9/00 000? Ot ^MS. Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use SDescription of Workvw&tr ^v 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) SQ. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms OU Name Address City 3, APPLICANT ^Contractor Q Agent for Contractor d Owner D Agent for Owner , State/Zip Telephone #Fax # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # Address City State/Zip Telephone #Name 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of. Section 7031 .5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]).- ' - City State/Zip City Business License # VWS Name State License ff Address License Class >>V\ Telephone # Q<\> Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _ 6. WOlfERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ^P~ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company \5U*-V--e#r frVKt\tMP<V Tfr-^"^ Policy No.'V^OOQfeVAUo ~b^ I Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE _ DATE _ 7, OVMNlIf BUILDER DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: f~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). n I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). n I arn exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1 . I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES I~1NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): _ __ __ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? fj YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? |~[ YES l~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? d YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. •CO^Ii|gflO!i|iNiiiG'iPAGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME SO^&^Wg^ CtAT-W^ ^Jf?^ LENDER'S ADDRESS 9.APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced fnrj\ parinri nt ipn_Haye (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). //>7iAPPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Permit #: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: Sewer Dist: Inspected By: . /2^/c^ Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: CB004801 NEW SINGLE SFD 321 9 SF, FAMILY RESIDENCE GAR 600 SF.COV ENTRY 164 SF 1345 CHESTNUT AV JOHN LEE D *.?&'>• Phone: 7604197879 Water Dist: Date x Inspected: 4//z.t//<rjL Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date: Permit Type: Sub Type: Lot: 0 Approved: _/-""" Approved: Approved: 04/22/2002 RESDNTL SFD Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Comments: Inspection List Permit*: CB004801 Type: RESDNTL SFD Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 04/26/2002 89 04/25/2002 19 04/25/2002 29 04/25/2002 39 04/25/2002 49 04/25/2002 89 04/22/2002 89 04/22/2002 89 02/05/2002 82 01/30/2002 16 01/29/2002 16 01/29/2002 84 01/23/2002 16 01/17/2002 84 01/15/2002 84 12/12/2001 13 11/28/2001 13 10/12/2001 22 10/05/2001 11 10/05/2001 12 10/04/2001 11 09/28/2001 21 09/28/2001 22 09/20/2001 21 09/20/2001 22 Final Combo Final Structural Final Plumbing Final Electrical Final Mechanical Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Insulation Insulation Rough Combo Insulation Rough Combo Rough Combo Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Sewer/Water Service Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB - RGB - RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB NF PD RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB RGB AP we we CO we Rl NR Rl AP AP CO AP NR CO NR AP AP AP AP AP CO AP we AP we NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SFD 3219 SF.GAR 600 SF.COV ENTRY 164 Comments ALL 3 SIGNATURES ARE ON CARD - FINAL GMR EMR AM PLEASE NO SIGNATURES ON CARD AM PLEASE O.K. TO DRYWALL POLYSEALT.P. PENETRATIONS IN GARAGE OK TO COVER OK TO POUR MISSING REBAR AND VERTICALS ON ALL 4 GARAGE FTGS OK TO COVER Monday, April 29, 2002 Page 1 of 1 *N UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE ***• INSPECTOR PERMIT # £t>o#*l PLAN CHECK # JOB ADDRESS DESCRIPTION ^> 3^/1Sf CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ftP 3? City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/29/2002 Permit# CB004801 Title: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Description: SFD 3219 SF.GAR 600 SF.COV ENTRY 164 SF Inspector Assignment: RGB Sub Type: SFD 1345 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT PLEINBOB Owner: Remarks: EARLY AM PLEASE -rFUNERAL AT 11AM Phone: 7605184546 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 16 Insulation Act Comments Requested By: KIM Entered By: CHRISTINE r/ Associated PCRs PCR02028 PENDING Date 01/23/2002 01/17/2002 01/15/2002 12/12/2001 11/28/2001 10/12/2001 10/05/2001 10/05/2001 10/04/2001 09/28/2001 09/28/2001 09/20/2001 09/20/2001 Inspection History Description 16 Insulation 84 Rough Combo 84 Rough Combo 13 Shear Panels/HD's 13 Shear Panels/HD's 22 Sewer/Water Service 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor 22 Sewer/Water Service 21 Underground/Under Floor 22 Sewer/Water Service Act NR CO NR AP AP AP AP AP CO AP we AP we Insp Comments RC NF PD RC RC RC OK TO COVER RC OK TO POUR RC RC MISSING REBAR AND VERTICALS ON ALL 4 GARAGE FTGS RC RC RC OK TO COVER RC NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD (760) 602-2700 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE / 7270 I TIME. LOCATION / PERMIT NO. FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? I I YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR . CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 TELEPHONE: (619) 560-1713 NOTICE OF EXCAVATION INSPECTION JOB LOCATION:- WC?RK ORDER NO • ftsC/ / $i REF. WORK ORDER NO.: OWNER OR CONTRACTOR:. DATE INSPECTED:A TYPE OF EXCAVATIONS: CONTINUOUS FOOTING CAISSON__ FRICTION PILE SWIMMING POOL DESCRIPTION OF EXCAVATIONS COVERED BY THIS NOTICE: /•"T »""*» — J$ > 3,3 ^4 SPREAD FOOTING. /A) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI , The undersigned has inspected the excavations listed above on the referenced property and same were excavated in accord- ance with our recommendations in the preliminary foundation report and the Building Code of the DI-STR: (\) Office (2) Inspector (3) Project PACJJJC SOJLS ENGIJMf^RIJ^IjS, INC. SIGNATURE / Form 79 DAIL Y FIELD ENGINEERING RE FOR T PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Client:Work Order; Clients Representative:Tract No.Date; /o/4/pt Project Name; 3T/ifiw0E/?gi/Pay: Project Location:Weather Conditions: Contractor:Approximate Fill Yardage : Type and Number of Rigs in Operation: Description of Project Activities; Site Visitors / Firm: TECHNICIAN M- Page f of dafldrpt.sam /of / HOURS BILLED TO PROJECT Field 0 Office For Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 05/11/01 OAEELJCANT (CTJURIS^ JURISDICTION: Carlsbad " PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 SET: II Q PLAN REVIEWER PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 a FILE PROJECT NAME: Chestnuts Homes (Units A SB B) A) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. ] The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: KalTumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC LOG trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 01/04/01 OAEELfQANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 PROJECT NAME: Chestnuts Homes (Units A & B) I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. [ | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ^ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. A] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to 2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008 M -c-y i I I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IXI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob t/.u..^ Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Date contacted:!-£-*H (by: fyv) Fax #: l~H»o) "7i*)-5€5lH- MaiL- Telephone*" Fax,_ In Person REMARKS: By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/21/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 STORIES: One HEIGHT: 19 Ft. (App. per UBC) REMARKS: FLOOR AREA: Dwelling (3219) Garage (600), Porch (75), Covered Entry (164) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: O1/04/01 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 • Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 2 Show on plans the required building setback from top/toe of the slope per UBC (Section 1806.5) and Figure 18-1-1. Where applicable. 3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS • SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION 4. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 5. Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms and water closet compartments, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. Section 1203.3. 6. Show location of windows R and S on floor plan for plan B. Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 7. Provide separate floor plan for each plan A and B. If plan A is identical to plan B the state that floor plan is for plan A and B on sheet 2. 8. Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters). The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. Provide calculation. 9. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4. Extend wall framing and 5/8" type" X " gyp, board to roof diaphragm between garage and dwelling (apply 5/8 " Gvp. Board from mudsill to roof diaphragm) or_provide 2 layers of 5/8" type "X" Gvp. Boards on ceiling per UBC table 7-C Item 21. 10. Cross-reference all building sections shown on page 9 to floor plan. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 11. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: • Manufacturer's name. • Model name/number. • ICBO approval number, or equal. • STRUCTURAL • Note: The structural calculation is not submitted. Please provide two sets on structural calculations. The follow are only sample corrections. Additional corrections may follow. 12. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: • The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, • The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and • The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 13. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 14. Note: The structural calculation is not submitted. Please provide two sets on structural calculations. The follow are only sample corrections . additional corrections may follow. Carlsbad 00-4801 O1/04/01 15. Specify the slab on grade thickness and reinforcement on plans per soil report. 16. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. 17. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer roof truss package applies to unit B only. 18. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. Additional corrections may follow. 19. Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2314. 20. Show clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure nonbearing condition between supports as designed). 21. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: • Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. • The design load. • The spacing of the trusses." 22. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.3.3. Provide calculation for all headers with span more than 4 feet. 23. Lateral design is not submitted. Provide complete two sets of structural calculation. The following are only sample corrections. Additional corrections may follow. 24. In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table 23-ll-G. 25. Provide a complete shear wall schedule on plans. Shear wall schedule is not found. 26. Provide general notes and specifications, for example for concrete and wood. CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1 For gas piping under slabs that serve kitchen island cooktops, see Policy 91-46 for special sleeve and clean-out requirements. Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 2 New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 3 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: ; OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Engineer's/Architect's Seal & Signature Here Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: D Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Q Field Welding D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI D High Strength Bolting n Prestressed Concrete O Expansion/Epoxy Anchors D Structural Masonry D Sprayed-On Fireproofing D Designer Specified D Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. C. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 00-4801 01/04/01 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh DATE: 01/04/01 BUILDING ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Deck Cov. Entry Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA II Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier 3219 600 75 164 cb City Est. By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance T Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 280,359 280,359 $1,254.58 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: l~1 Repetitive Fee T Repeats Complete Review D Other D Hourly Structural Only Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee $815.47 $652.38 Comments:Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering DATE: BUILDING AD' BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT "APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. [A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL By: Please seethe /attached report of deficiencies marked wmh D. Make necessary corrections to plans or speclfieattolTs for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By:o* Date: 0(0/06/Of Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: V ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet U Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2741 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 CA 92008|-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602*85@® ^ r;. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow "FT^ Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing & Proposed Structures -StfTJriveway widths £f Existing Street Improvements (j$J Existing or proposed sewer lateral J3^"property Lines GX Existing or proposed water service .Encasements Jr""Existing or proposed irrigation service Itf/h. SfaL 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. CH CH 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc r\ Rev. 7/14/00 r;. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1s! 2ND 3'DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be . constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst Forni (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3rd checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: CD CH IH 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: D D D 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D /Q\ D 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst Forni (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 1ST D oND D 3RD D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: D D D nan ana 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. Q^Required fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. HAWORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuikJtng Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST •1ST 2N 3RD D D D • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuikJing Plancheck Cklst Form (Genehc).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. n D 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a / refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. D D D 13. Additional Comments: H:WVORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buikli(ig Plancdeck Cklst Form (Generic).<toc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based op,building plancheck plan submittal. , /&/£Address: Prepared by: Bldg. Permit No. Date:Checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^^P1^ Sq. Ft./Units: (_ Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages. for all uses. Types of Use: O/"^) _ Sq. Ft./Units: / Types of Use:Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE / PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: f /^ •* X NO. UNITS:_ D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT'sl(UNITS/ = $ S D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 ADT's/UNITS: X D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: D 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: ZONE: X ! FEE/ADT: / /v . #1 DIST. #2 FEE/ADT: FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: = $ / /I DIST. #3 ) ^ = $ *& ^ 'U: FEE/EDU: D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_ ACRES: HIGH /LOW FEE/AC: 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION Word\Docs\Misforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet 1 Of 2 Rev. 7/14/00 4178 ENG. INSPECTIONS CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR- PROJECT iP^^y 00 -GRADING PERMIT NO, LOTS REQUESTED FOR _ N/A = NOT APPLICABLE V = COMPLETE 0 * INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE 1st 2nd. 1. Site access to requested tots adequate and togfcaHy grouped, 2. Site erosion control measures adequate. 3. Overatt site adequate for health, safety and welfare of pubBe. 4. Letter of request for partial release submitted. 5. 8y*'X-\r site plan (attachment) showing requested tots submitted. 6. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. 7. Er^ineer of Wc<kcertfkaticocfwc^ done and oad elevations, 8. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist ^ 9. Fire hydrants within 500 feet of building combustibtes and all weather roads access to site. Partial release of grading for the above stated tots is approved for (he purpose of buBding permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: [Inspector l££t^ Construction Manager Date H:\IJBRARV\ENG\WPDATAWSreCTf ORMS^ARTSITEFRM ooI -3" &TOQ u- s S \S \ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB \Address £V\€Srbt\A^4- Planner Greg Fisher APN: Phone (760) 602-4629. Type of Project & Use: Zoning: K- \ General Plan: Net Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: DU/AC I CFD fin/nut) # Circle One _Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) D Legend:Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES Item Incomplete - Needs your action NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ' Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: | | | I Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: YES NO Foliow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst I I I I Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES V/ NO _ (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) .Data Entry Completed? YES M NO _ , (A/P/D's, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, tdolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1 • Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. 2. — - 3. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Accessory structure J^ront: Interter Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation Lot Coverage: Required £lO Required IO r Required • — Required &O! setbacks: Required Required Required Required : Required Required MO °2t Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown ) Shown >ao'ia ' 2,0 ' ^°7^ 4. Height:Required 5. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Additional Comments 30'Shown Shown Shown b\u&&b*J* OK TO ISSUE AND EMTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst ADRIANA DRAGUS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2661 BRIGHTON RD. CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 PH (760) 434-4067 FAX (760) 434-3367 t/ JOB NO. DATE SH. _ OF </V 2 -o / 1^-—^ 0 4 COMMERCIAL •RESIDENTIAL • ROOM ADDITIONS • • COMPETITIVE PRICES' FREE AND PROMPT ESTIMATES Specializing in roof and floor trusses 2847 INDUSTRY STREET OCEANSIDE, CA. 92054 ICBO # AA-513 (760)722-7696 FAX (760) 722- 0438 CL UJCD ce r-- i—^ eni -< i=iO — c_) ic r\j 11 c_j> LLJ tor-. i—i i— —en i a_ LJ_en en -a i—'en CD en P-- co j i cxi LLJ r---en -a: enCJ CD CJ3 I— 31 8=5C_3 CO LD _\ — i ~Z. UJ1C CC "-•>. Li_C\JLlJOJ U_C-JIr-i — ien _ j D_C77 -*i i — i-en cn cn O"i en en en en en t_j en en co -<ar <—i -<i en en en en en co CD coco to co CO CO CO CTJ C/D CO •r-l CD -r-l CD CO CXI LO CD CO CJ CJ CJ CO CO CJ tJ cc cc on cc cr C3CDCI1 CD CJ CD CO CO CO -st CD C3 CDCL Q- CL I—LLJ . LU. LU LL- G £ S 5"SsS 1§ 3 o -5 'G -Sfe S ^sKssase& .O-.B ,t-.9 .2/1 5-.i ^78 FORNIA LUMBER INSPECTION SERVICE March 22,2000 Too Who It May Concern, Structural Truss. Sincerely, William J. Butler StructuralTnissarevaliduntil March 22, 2000. Structural Truss U.B.C. f 231 1.6. If you have any questions, please contact CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS P.O. Box 6989 San Jose, CA 95150 BRANCH OFFICES Los Angeles (714) 962-9994 Oregon 00-3 CampuTrus, inc. Manufacturing • Engineering • Computer Systems WARNINGS: 1. Read all General Notes and Warnings before construction of trusses. 2. Builder and erection contractor should be advised of all General Notes and Warnings before construction commences. 3. 1x3 compression web bracing must be installed where shown +. 4. All lateral force resisting elements such as temporary and permanent bracing, must be designed and provided by designer of complete structure. CompuTrus assumes no responsibil- ity for such bracing. 5. No load should be applied to any component until after all bracing and fasteners are complete, and at no time should any loads greater than design loads be applied to any component 6. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responsibility for the fabrication, handling, shipment and installation of components. 7. This design is furnished subject to the limitations on truss designs set forth by the Truss Plate Institute in "Bracing Wood Trusses, HIB-91", a copy of which will be furnished by CompuTrus upon request. GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted: I. Design to support loads as shown. : (2) Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be laterally braced at 2'-0" o.c. and at 12'-0" ox:, respectively. 3. 2x4 Impact bridging or lateral bracing required where shown + +. 4. Installation of truss is the responsibility of the respective contractor. 5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for "dry condition" of use. 6. Design assumes full bearing at all supports shown. Shim or wedge if necessary. 7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided. 8. Plates shall be located on both faces of truss, and placed so their center lines coincide with joint center lines. 9. Digits indicate size of plate in inches. 10. For basic design values of the CompuTrus Plate, indicated by the prefix "C", see I.C.B.O. R.R. 4211 II. The CompuTrus Net Section Plate is indicated by the prefix "CN", the designator (18) indicated 18 ga. material is used. All others are 20 ga. General Notes: Bracing to top and bottom chords not required, provided the chord members are braced throughout their length by continuous sheathing. I STRUCTURAL TRUSS INC S^UJjSfc I CERTIFIED INSPECTION £&&**•<*&£< IN STRICT ACCORDANCE /& WITH U.B.C. 2311.6 ff//-Mrt oqM7PREFABRICATED M/NO. 28017 \O EXP. 3/31/03 O. 0.V) V)JSia _ 11U. t DaS' 1 S'™uj « ^ S 5 ni oiSAA j 3^U 0 CO O) CC O O(9 O ODz 10 ID cs in in*H V V Z • •I/I (U CM »•••«»«>-> II UJo. m « mt- i n h-•s, — (VI u.as*> • •S?Wu. u.l&Jo.l&J UJ tu5 5; ill io is in!\j a —f-l I>-a LUa in I? a o m ri O O»• r- • io o u. u.j j& CL i Z oo j in i 2 -J IV II 2 * M tri E §E slsl ..sU CCCS^U^lA^"hJ S X * * O V? i/i uj o **-. a ^ ui ^ IP ^ y? ry A> rv 23 in § OUJ i II ™ip! 11 « Oa . < a t MsJ ^H o23 ^v ?*V) u utop«K3I- K 0. =(• •. -i O-H u- OOT LUD 3 5 UJ I- U.< 111Q a: o, CDD oin a 01•J) I M?!11*"|j|« *«fffj .£«tiUjJfifr Jjlfe;!?^j5ii i{i?i:Si ^N ritf Ns ? roolr-a\w £ S £ Q g oininiuQ2Oa < Ninu.O in1a Cou.Xo m fcCO UJ m I o50XCM«NOT-XCM1 X «? 00XCM » * XCM CM VCM -a+ •«S CM 1 CM *V:COCO5CD CO 9 b» 9 O> CM 0) CO fl. en 10 9<o 9 IO OOs ioCOCMCO;!in o ro b> '« b> »- CO rup t- ID 7 (D TIn 0o*— CM 90.OCO o b> CM b> . oi CO in 9 co CO to CO io o8 V35O)o79 o o b> b 0) CO CO CO m to CN (O <?in o g 7rr-ID0b 9o bo o CO 9oo Ki T (D v (O in owIB«r- h-Sj0(O0 b «9 CO f^ 00 CO CO ^ •7 (O £o in 't om11 iT-7tnb^ 7 i en in b> 9 b> K- CO <o m (O in in O atin -•7b>r>i^ b in CO «CO o> X ^1 CO CM 1^ IO T CO 7in LL. ff 5 DCM^NO)b b o bo s o> CO CO b (0 «P CO CO IO CO in O 5 :>M•7j>bo£>b OO b) oo f^ co CO CO CO K- m io OJ co in a CS ^1-COO)•gCOo7 CO b o b> b b> CO "CD CO m (O CM to CM in I inin itCMJ)•*010 CO b CM CO b CO 9 CO b rr to 7 IO in li- en 0V"« TCN7DO)no ^ b i CO 9 CD 0) t CO 7 (P in X 3 3*•oCO7o 0) < ^ CO CN CO IO 7 CO o in i X 044t UO•j n 15c •oP 1 0 £ ! o•^ CTp E Ait B 1 So g r-t inCO CD«t? TO 0- CD O (J Q.if dz UJ \L oco CO UJQ CO § 5 O CM UJ < UJO o: 0) 6m3 CO8oin CMCO O UJ CO Xb- <3 ^TS: ^S \ M qdnOco Zi <(j^f ID co vn5 *~ *~ muAa.O <o t o_J «- ^ COtoSUlLL^t <D ,2 -o » z "J< 2% 2S g11 a? Q O 5 v UI I UJt§ o o oCN CM >* s»s (0 to to UI 0 UI8, UI0 Bco Eno^^s.01CO CM r- co K <? CO O COco t tCMoCOk.co 7 r- m f^ 7 CO O a. 3 -xCM 9oTinCO n f- * ^ O * TiCM bco-«?CO co CD 7 f» CO fx. o CM 3CM B1—0)coCOi- 9 CD in CD CM ^. o ,_ CO o0 -aCM COCOinob CM in CD in CN CO Q D CM B^^\- in ^j- en <• 1in a n CO ^XCM bCO^«?COCO CO to °!^. X toto » tCOitoT90) CO (O B^ f;- fSfc I tr m•eT* * o>COT9CO =0 CD "*~~ l> fs^ 1 5 "xCM CNCOf.CD9CO •^ CD N- to CO f*. X s CN CMCOCOCDb !r- •f <o 1f- •x. 1-co OO * '«?COin9bfp CN in up m CM CO X. g 3CM Tt-<NT- m ^ 01 Tf Tin X nz CO •» oh-7Ven •f ^ CO f- T CO trto oos »» IMoco>__CO 7 ^. in h- 7 CO K co oo CM K bo^rtnco • CO h- JI f. K CO Zen *r bb)-«?•coco Ol CD Ol f- tr CO 0oCO ^ ^O)B_CDT*9CO 00 CO JI •Y^. tr CO oinco I NCOmCD9kco f CO h; CO CO ^ tr CO oin •» Vcobj:CMVm .1 ^ o r- . 7 Q % IDXCM 9co.»-COCMuin *, ^ t *~ Q tr •8 > COinin*-0NCO* , i ^" .y a 5 «CM inDbCOV<*> ^7 K ** 0 * ce 7)CNCO9•«o en ^ T CO t CO a 2to ID 15inM^J?* ? . *" f 1«J X COco <0 MCM —r.3!V:M* in B 1 O ^V X it s CD XCM ,-in^-3j:co in . 7 o «y X 5 SCM n*no9CMCO 9 . o By " X CM ID XCM 0,CMCO9Soo en •*» Ten T 17) X to «CM K.CObNCOCMJoin y ' * trto CM 'xr* 9(O^COfvjwin *7 ^ K t *" R trco | S enmn-9?Mb^ • 7 . '" . f1" trto 0mCO 'xCM Join•M-b•<*• " T- K tr S o§ to ,_ini_•byBCM* in c *- O "~ t S* g. co ainCO IDxCM In!nb°*«?co 9 O m * trco oin CDxCM i§ u 0 w otr § n.p IciQUJ >- Q. O 3u.0QUJ U) XN Kw 5w ^ 30000 I §55§ X II II II II ^ '^ ^" UJ W 3 3w w Q ujz oUI < o o UJgg II:Q 0 •g 8 «/) UJD UJ g 1 1 T.5 *~ ">tt- O CM 6"z uiUJ I- LL'=! < UJu. o o: iif f tfu, IB|*V)5!>k-b 111 .-o c. i z«-° 8 ' ni u « z i Sz eu - 5 u SB.J 5§S "tE!§8 9i s«' a u.Mu ,1 w •« p •i K kin t3 <y I »V V 5 uj55 a: fc°? 50-90-S ta li I * ifl'lfl g? JI 'mmI 1 ** «• * *' ?CVfU* * *iii r x *** w n * <(t) U It It CO B) 03 O ft O I_Z !•» P> ^ ••** 1C C Ifl **in £ in in v 11 in<o icA. Ifi ««• tfit- I H k • >- iUJ *- >—3 Z _2I"" 2 fcI inni I Ul O z z e .0 ui a ffl o•« 3 6^ § « ty' uj S« I SC I-., < w i i 1 2i d ' "f " yuz i i! i o a^ w^ »* »* a ta ! w m ' i;j|tt"2gE w r' e i £ I IIv v M ase b ;K s*^ ut cu ni O <£ I Ul I Rn tO- I At i* I i-i IIJ i* 1iii ill V «3r ru v is. IB iti * iri, m i IDI/I I I t UI I t<• ni n«•» CM (IVin ft IPft , , ,s. - fu m R ' S• u e * S i 2 Z «3< O UJ -52ui a vi «a-J ZZ^* f-4 o o a * e d zm •> o i 5 *"4 o (S ^. i d i m tv •» 5 ' .. ZfVl Ift H• _ » 08 OT i «V V I U) UJ IU *™ ** •* T 3 3 k«V nj •• S co K <CO O C ropcrbo: SO-90-S to-w-o t*4 i IPS s .§•, Hi isjjjjfjl 8*1*1* M'lfl Si^fs*« f§Si« =* { Si1 ill i 2 : 00 or-- i i ' t t •ftKin I • »ui ^ fti *•)Su * x x i J.• ^ Or 3 Nts a D£ , ,•v » ni .' g®V U « _/_i 1 _l ni I » « ! - -I * o»*u.4*g E U X !IU -fe S I*ti5 5 •-> H K K U Uv> tv ni eu f 3> - ZZ tor- < ^ CtUJ1 v-ozen - JO-90-S SO-Ol-S | il:j Idi,li «**« S e H! IS II ! i« -S*5 i*l5« •Of a .« 4fS:»?8-SH«SE, p fii JI «'»if%!i ll-.l l|i!ilK*sfi*P'I»S'fl'fil'wg, "Ifef 5- I nii !! i i•ihi»!ijililt » .Ij!ii!!! 01y*o5H t m* i i Mi HHii lilil I* • j !ii r- in aS S IK i tf) tt n <\j fu •«•• nj rt v iftX Jc S I 7 *Z O O O Oi-. ip I*. !».V) f£ ftj ftj fcfe5- JO) (DED (71 01i -Nss a r<t u v^ 2 wH-t 31S&r^ 1" m in Cia a a C O Q .= 5 * o <6 UJ EP £ •8; U" IH & K .n» u I2 33 o --a:mi =3<C^u-"' _«.p^uioiujopo^tQiD^l-^Q.^Sw^&50?£Q-OH S IOrW-0 •t ao S(n " !^^\*m# PI! I!££l^l$|5 Sflet .Ki is «I|«KI1j|,.«ifig.-.JJircHitM H !l .i1ill,\M\ i i ft J iI iinwi fijHi -IW P8*jf»l;llhiJilHi 3iHiPijSlsfir il] >M in•< U.'d O viINO vj \ io in in in *V i iin i • i »HI ** ftJ H •*. .m > 5 «CO O D ~ UiD LU Q;»< ftlu <n a;z in — •»>~ IB ID tovi <n K f>I NZ *h- I N IN, •* (\j ri>4W *• t- »-5m fe°^J~i^V)OT£ . n-so-i vr r ffi /l- «£ = i i *,PI U fi*?,«I111 i" iplliiiiiiliii I! iii *B5 inr-ot- nSSkSZX Iin a n m«« i iiCH|i&AIA t- l- H- £2 5 !«*!T Ui fx KLS e e eI D 10 16e a-3 •» ij 3 ss 1 I ' -• tj .. DM u co aft °S S M C. Hss sSi fert ta, X X« f\l OJ ^ ^ uj u- u. 1 * II X U L)(V *— CD j -V)F B s A a Hu Cw - o!c!"in1 SJ ilMi f B I!!»!*5ill5 K I ^5 111i! n1*N I ^§ ili^s I :•iJfliS.I ^le'SI .a| sHllMI1 i**w S^8j8«s£|f|i8 -U»~. .K&• •^ws5s. ? *iE-;«-e»|«»«s,!sf «=5|eS|- 1i«6fl3HSS il il "Illll i! : i ill!I r-o & <t «,ru cj8-8 '§ 5 B S Si I""1I «** m A.1UJ OJ a260 <J 0 IBas? fj^ I U^ iQ. 03 ** pitt i h >- IV «• (V U. I>H U t H i m. o- i oo >.it "f U »•< Z M Z Z O< O ttla. « u (/I M <t *.% Ss si K o IO s I£ a ^4 « UJ U)fc Sg t iV V i!i D (u|m i-• _»»»> v ,- 5 !s II «. i-B ff I 52 t -HCO H < JO-1 I, IjjliijlIIII iHthJiMIi iinhi^filIP'"i«njiiijimmii i Vi ctvtcifiocn 52 i ®V u N fs 91 91' ' ' ' 5 -iiCiAAiA i d-sg * v x * s ' j ~ £ii bv i no o e3C f * *U CD D 06OZ ^ i"v fuW m td to** i ii»- I K Is, »< cy m»p-»r~I»!b!| (9 Ci ")>-< T< •*CCS-N I U 111 W S w wk^4 U.»4U 11 o o o ox• a 51 ^ n rt ! 10 . a "* ** : ** Jv * i _«w §sft t ui t*- oft £B M * *J «J££111 UI ( 1-7 -LU•5 n °- 2 Z toSggi1^»-6(K JO-WH ^-ft a5eg r>r-Or-o>H i- 1/7 a< UJ UI£ O ^ ^ I v> AI ru ? m £OfI,.-1 (MUj fflzooi-l ^ Vv; in ini i5!C i A in(\i 8 " IB tn U Q e i «: MI : a <r>£'< 1 =EQ S S r H: n J (fi COo 5Hu-h r5 — z Z. CDCOH<^to O Q —a:<S<dl§S^?£BLZ^JUJopccta:iSte**-k°^ £ • »U. M. ffff e o o ^s?'^ k 8 tvc £S 5 S z iX Z _l O « suu^rx :"IQ-;ftiI I- t- Ogg c-i ?s 1C cu fti ! I issfe fe S1^m o uo o §§W (n ^5H (E Ss Xtit Xm " M 1, |i» s5-? iml InI i K*I * !*5* f t; IS L I« ifch-MH I - ^ I l! E^i»g{ ElH1 ! !!i {iini ! IP" (Or* 3 n nTI m It Itin v>1C 10m ina. Nuj n 'i S IDi m p..53288??in w< v« Q CD *< *** ^ (n m •» •»i i i I I i tr 3CS .i i&s" COo ^-< *<* I < I H I I— 01 n w r> to in t- >• ^ t- K •- I l~ b I w N £5 c is ec a: U LU "' "J? 5 > > CL I o ^m in v5m-J e CE w 'o CP o 10 10in in I IC3 • ' ' • *-*••*z e Q o ifl PT <^i« CD S U (U • •S m *4 wID ID3 ..ii ^ ^^^^ ^^SSS«3 99 m Q rt • a>01 ^CM tu u u u yK >- ^ g IB i- r^ ^^ iu in ^ s ^b ODCDOffi O K^M < 5 a x i« ,. 5 a aty ttg*iU»<u;C op1U U X * • ID (/) O.C.a u x ui t ai/i u ex p 3M a » v> v<u o f-i IT&'i*a a x H-Ul iii ** *t ii Z g +s| •; s i *g 1:Hf ] Jfi f>IN C3 IX : 3~ 2 £*B^flM*fi?*SO Q * S r5 E • .° <o 1 MCOUJ 2 £ 2 § o ootr ADJU?<occia: i-u-o—t:op- —^«c tCuJ OTWUJ0o< o1=< oto 6z UJ_l u. CO S 0,_o ill1-< 0 OW WUJo r If)(Ni u.UJK f lfl (U (MC K *•CI ^ VT 'If) I I -> 0UJ -" (M (^ «ff 0) ft OlCI ^ V ft IE O O' ' "z fj tuzev^a £ « •»M n m cu in Z • •V 10 -V •» ID H •" ••«4 «* 9^ •* SI I I I 5m •• ifta(•lull•x •• ft i») v !s£ I O O i e o sg t ^S $ i/> "•• 2 SPECIF1CATLUMBER* u. W C S.UJ O u ^?Z N>H O Ul H U52CE VI S0w £ _j ^<a CIE GRADEDP CHORDS:r Ul 1 • §Qnc zxPg 0 D III§i°g•»VP J "^ OVs .•t- o 10 3 * m \ i«•* 4» ,^S B Ax 5 V ^e fe«fe » < WEB inI X i-5 S u> zo S a £!«_)_) >5 z < •-<_l Q >-. O U 45 8 S Sw S . <r« JL PS8 g fKi i g ifeu Sa§ din «-* *- ua S• S uD .. *j 7 B .Cl « O* wi *?-72 gII :>« i T fftf ^5^«-< i i S % 5•s a si H | JK * **. . Q i^ ^ vv *S-£j p us B-8-3si |! 3f«i ^ S& W S • T3 * SK J-S5| fe 5 ^ Innt.^0 ss a-^ass ^55 u. » t S T 33 £52 t£ (-» Sit7 V n• •fr r ?*CJ ftjN*2S \^LAg in ^ M MV> At > 10iS!3 .£ .i e> i!8ii m •> ^ in e isa r r *I [6 S CD «i z v *tt tf iB9= s<U ftl (U* I ai •» n to IX £ K IE O C i*" Kl A h.•^ a a O O f- O 00 (-B.«q • -M e no O 3 § WU.U.U»4fc tO IB U U. L.ii^5 -n*1 £SS 03 l- o o e o z b o a tfi*-i c ip ifl wss 10 1C(V (MI I I I Sooo -- a. o PI8 rid u u §1 4J U" 2-J u ,, tt e ttS Ul V) * ~ 'u. q ei K 3iS..§rUSi8K; $ U IUJ I Bg ^ . 0.I Di in I a feDfe b J u w » T S X „ .(n IM ni fti ii vi |/> I • I W 9 •u *• AJ n ^ if? toI*,,*,*U B (D B ttz IP o a eMl 10 I*. »SU> r* S> B>V, »» M Cl tr 3 cu CMgIrt ^£ |fefea n virt >- f •-»-£ <s aid n OIL) S ^-i ( a10 2 i3 So ig I i ID j *^ ^ t ^ ID . .UJ U UZ I I I 0 O« M M I •• IIa cu fu , 8 iu ..51 v vM yj y? 5 g CBr s i < e ifu D cu ID t- e i* ^ m en O. is y %ii_ r r/i i g S3U UJ <• 53 ii A ^^ tfl IT! ru \1\\fi• * 1 •* • £t1*!! I 'Bi st*« 4 * t=pHii Il>?«= I «- ? 1^«s« I h ,| ?|,!!«!,i ISiJe J»l CO Or- ca m x » niftvi M m Nm ^ T fl!i - IUj i N 1-1 vff f- * * »^888— ruSB aJJ6 n (•. fs r7 5 W 10 «g W4 «H* S (U IVoSin** •-•x. - n/ n ' u>-> u ;• ii (U ri U [ft IB ^r <n ; T ••nj w <M to t-% » « w i C.I O £ S ^ t 1 "" e sffui ui , 55 10-Tfl-O : fa S S n 3 5 a n01z --u ~ & r) 4 in ui i g "*•"•'•!****" I -££U. N» Ow ** »• c£ 2 ^ ^^,,,~* tit ftUL! A B 0Z £ ED ift ftr,,r> SLL'CD *» 03= 53S S1 H "Si.0 .' S *"^ HgK •- < *- as_l gVI U_ Lk, UP ;SSE > °. «• °. 11 SS?g;n ^«;2B tt 1C < I _<!§§sps !&8^> "11- t- a *— r7 0 ^g tS« in i-*• •> K~> i Sr r R 9 i2 £ T i rt (OI I. s: ss ** iia^s"oi i = Ba £wo t a^*M ss fea^ b p i fir « •< u? fu r^Q^---;^^LUH-^ulHit5?u]w ^°5 2 to-fa-o t au Ctn - g»-<N I nWtfl* V INW *£ ^ «w 4-ri >•i i i4- i i y J 40z *CO u— O *3 S» 44D J> <S2 iU 4- Xo§EflL S ^-PS «L S^ *-^^^S -^ <»« go,ril tt=<O -<Z3 K J •D O 0°-"Z tt O"- •9 til S|S3£S i J I! o Q. OO I i to :d 1 O"Z ^5oo CO o Ul_J u_ u(0 in UlO CO 5 <o Q *"- O CM }fi ^^ Ul0 CC ^ 60 r--om m w OUlto s zo <o 2O UI •9OstCO 8— z <o*<=>2ttSQi_^< CO iuO §0 CONNEOZ 01s 9 o I % inUlO £ u.' o>6to S>n m OT 0UiCO CD o> in•- »- COCOK.UJ O1 a< •UJ f£co iCO OCO *"o •$ UIx « s 1 2-J 3 r^/^ i s j— «. JP— * ji-*u. u. u.WWW illill 0X111osXS o: CD U. UI o » UIo5 (9 UI N CO bcv9COCD«•>bCM O CO i CO u X rMk r 9COCMCOifCO3CO ^ CO o> 0ID m ^w t S-co1^9•»i-«TJ JO CO IO rCM co n DO 1-cocjo•»i-™ Jo CO o> 0r> <o O CMi i-cor>o•»t;CO e» CO IO M O • ' CM0^«-•»CM<T3 0 CO 9 CO Q K 91 «* rt g*° CM!o 9CM 00•» <0Jo °" <*v^ *«•> II o> co Q X Si 9 *T ^~CO CO COrM «o €•cooco29<?co •* •»9 *r *rcrj <TJ in h'f <? CO CO CO 03 O CO J O CM»- CM CM « «> t^ ' ^^ ^^ i O O I O tO erf nrj «T *°""*7 *?"* "*M CO« *COCO 29 ifO ^ •/> Oi^ (D 00 O 1 O) <O [D 0* 'D ^» V- *7n *°> opr *r '9 > 10 • o- CM1 T IO ^i_«,<o(Or.V B 10 CO3 4 CD co BO Vi_mf<oBV B 10 CO3•> 09 D 4 - 9» «°M (0n tor «3 109r "° - 9 > «° > CO> •-r r^ CO O * CD 08 5 .-to^•o«^-V-IO J_ CO oo3 4 o> Q EO » Oj>"*io"*if•Ooy* n IO 3 CO OIO«f op**—v•7«0op"* ? IO ooo>o m u. oIOID V1IO«0«o3V b> v> o *!. 3 <M CO U,X O> £V*,tf)TCD£* U io CO CMCM _ U.•x. O10o* 9tnCO10«°«09m b CO IO CM CO u. X li.o3 CMintotoCO10'fin •o <0 o0 M O CM U X II.o 3 ^toIN10opl>~rin ^ ^ CO»« CO X CM •t O K CMcoVCDOCOh1IO o ^ o Ifl X i !^CO'*?IDCM09TIO w **• 8 CO X con co*?coCMOOVCO ;. ^ CO M CO Q CM•t »03en03TCOinCO i, ^• ooo 0 a » coi-CD«P00tCO ^~^™ on CO O K a•s t ioco[^opCOCOco o^ CO iCM a> a « ^~inCM<o°?•^ >^ CO COD CO X I a CMCO•CD9•»fMIO O ^. COo>D 10 X 0IO CD^» TID«PCDCMCOVIO L_ ^. 3 M ID X u.0o00 toCOen<oV03nCD 3> ^ CO MCM _ X oIOCft kCO;-ioIDookcoV Is- to M CO X o3 CM bioCM^0030!o ki CD o D M 0 CM X o3 CM U_c (0•i0. 0 v AI uio ujo tctu Eo gto UJo I VI v, <N VI U. XtN UJ O -j--4 X g oui s! UJo O_ MJ o •v O - "^ ~y r^ r* m 2O II II It •ecafU oU) touiO 1 I x o «-flg *•» i 2 O CM O S Sf ' 2 OX&,U. O (t GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION CHESTNUT PROPERTY APN 205-210-09-00 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA For: HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY JULY 26, 2000 By: PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. San Diego, CA (Work Order 400739) Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY 3 Table A - UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters 4 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 4 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals 4 5.2 Existing Site Improvements 5 5.3 Grading Compliance 5 5.4 Site Preparation 5 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment 5 5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation 6 5.7 Compacted Fill Placement 6 5.8 Soil Material Suitability 6 5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics 6 5.10 Import Soils 7 5.11 Compaction Testing 7 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA 7 6.10 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria 7 6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation System 8 Table B - Conventional Foundation Design Parameters 6.3 Retaining Walls 8 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. Page 6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients 8 6.3.2 Other Design Considerations 9 6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems 9 6.3.4 Other Appurtenances 9 7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 9 APPENDIX: REFERENCES LABORATORY ANALYSES PLATE A - UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TABLE I - LOGS OF TEST PITS TABLE II - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA PLATES B-1 AND B-2 - DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA PLATES C-1 THROUGH C-5 - CHEMICAL ANALYSES (By Others) EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS PLATES G-1 THROUGH G-11 -GRADING DETAILS POCKET ENCLOSURE: SHEET 1 OF 1 -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 TELEPHONE: (858) 560-1713, FAX: (858) 560-0380 HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2541 State Street - Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008-1964 July 26, 2000 Work Order 400739 Attention: Mr Bob Plein Subject: Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the Chestnut Property, APN 205-210-09-00, in the City of Carlsbad, California References: See Appendix Gentlemen: Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) geotechnical foundation evaluation for the Chestnut property, APN 205-210-09-00, located in the City of Carlsbad, California. This work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated June 27, 2000 on the authorization of Mr. Bob Plein. The purpose of this investigation is to generally characterize site geotechnical condi- tions as they relate to the proposed construction of four (4) wood frame, residential structures supported by slab-on-grade foundation systems. 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK The following scope of work has been performed during PSE's investigation. 0 Review of published maps and geologic literature. 0 Mark-out and coordination of underground service alert. 0 Excavation, logging and sampling of three (3) exploratory test pits, exca- vated with a John Deere 31OE backhoe with 24 inch bucket (Table I). CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL: (909) 676-8195 TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (909) 676-1879 FAX: (714) 730-5191 Work Order 400739 Page 2 July 26, 2000 0 Laboratory testing and analyses of bulk samples consisting of: 1) hy- drometer analysis (Table II); 2) remolded direct shears (Table II and Plates B-1 and B-2); 3) compaction characteristics (Table II); 4) expan- sion index (Table II); and 5) chemical/resistivity testing (Plates C-1 through C-5). 0 General discussion of site geology. 0 Limited seismic hazards analysis. 0 Preliminary grading recommendations. 0 Preliminary foundation design recommendations. 0 Preparation of this report and accompanying exhibits summarizing our findings, conclusions and recommendations. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The vacant 1.44 acre parcel is relatively flat with drainage by sheet flow to exist- ing paved streets and associated storm drains. Currently the parcel supports a strawberry farming operation. Existing homes are located to the south, east and west. The intersection of Chestnut Avenue and Spanish Way form the north boundary (Sheet 1). 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is assumed that mass grading techniques will be utilized to create building pads, driveways and surface drainage improvements for support of four (4) resi- dential structures to the grades reflected on enclosed Sheet 1 of 1. It is expected that design cut/fill volumes will entail approximately 3,400 cubic yards of material. It is also understood that the proposed residential wood frame structures will be PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 3 July 26, 2000 supported by a slab-on-grade foundation system with shallow foundation ele- ments. Foundation plans should be reviewed for conformance to PSE's recom- mendations prior to construction. 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Although no existing site specific proprietary geotechnical reports were available for PSE's review, published data (Tan and Kennedy, 1996) indicates the site is underlain by terrace deposits of the Quaternary-age Lindavista Formation. Typi- cally, the Lindavista Formation consists of brown to reddish brown, silty to clayey sands. Tan and Kennedy indicates Santiago Formation cropping out one-half (0.5) of a mile southwest of the site at the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and it is likely that Santiago bedrock underlies the site at depth. Review of the regional geologic information indicates the absence of faulting within/or in immediate proximity of the site. The trace of the Rose Canyon fault is located approximately eight (8) kilometers southwest of the parcel. Owing to the dense character of the Lindavista and underlying Santiago Formation, liquefac- tion potential is very low. Ground shaking from large seismic events generated along offsite faults is possible, as with most areas in the seismically active south- ern California area. For structural design purposes, the parameters presented in Table A should utilized for post-graded lots. The site occurs in seismic zone 4, and therefore the seismic zone factor "Z" is 0.4. These parameters are meant to be consistent with UBC (1997). PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. r Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 Page 4 TABLE A UBC (1997) Seismic Parameters Soil Profile Type Ca Cv Na Nv Sc 0.40Na 0.56NV 1.0 1.1 Groundwater was not encountered at the time of PSE's subsurface investigation. It is considered unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during grading op- erations or building construction. It is possible that landscape and/or seasonal rainwater will perch over the relatively dense, Lindavista Formation. Based on PSE's general experience, the proposed three (3) foot cap is typically sufficient to allow for mitigation of nuisance water conditions. However, if perched conditions develop near finish grade surface, additional measures, such as the combination of area drains and/or French drains, may be required. 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals As a general guideline, removals will likely be on the order of three (3) feet and should be accomplished over the entire site. Localized areas may re- quire deeper removals and will depend upon conditions encountered dur- ing grading operations. Removal and recompaction should be accomplished for the three backhoe trenches (TP-1 through TP-3) excavated for this study. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 5 July 26, 2000 5.2 Existing Site Improvements To the best of PSE's knowledge, existing underground improvements do not exist within the proposed building envelopes. Underground utility im- provements may exist on the site along Chestnut Avenue. Additionally, residential structures exist on three sides of the subject lot. Given the proximity of the adjacent structures and improvements, care should be taken during grading operations. Accordingly, it should be the contractor's responsibility to protect adjacent improvements in these areas during grading and building construction. 5.3 Grading Compliance Grading should conform to the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad and the attached PSE earthwork specifications. Field observations will be required during grading by qualified geotechnical personnel. This should include full time observation and testing of fill soil placement by field tech- nician^) and periodic observation by the soil engineer. 5.4 Site Preparation Prior to grading, the site must be stripped and cleared of existing vegeta- tion, trash, debris and other deleterious materials. These materials should be removed and wasted offsite. 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment Once removals are completed, the removal excavations should be mois- ture conditioned to optimum moisture or slightly above (ASTM:D 1557-91) and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, prior to placement of compacted fill. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 6 July 26, 2000 5.6 Building Pad Overexcavation Where design grades and/or remedial grading creates a cut/fill transition on a building pad, the cut and shallow fill portions of the pad shall be overexcavated to provide a minimum compacted fill thickness of three (3) feet. Additionally, the undercut shall slope away from the pad a minimum of one (1) percent toward deeper fill areas in order to mitigate perching of subsurface water. 5.7 Compacted Fill Placement Fill should be spread in thin lifts (six to eight inches), the moisture content adjusted to a minimum of optimum moisture or slightly above, and the materials rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM:D 1557-91. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades are achieved. 5.8 Soil Material Suitability Excavated materials, which are approved by the soil engineer, may be utilized in compacted fill provided that trash, vegetation and other deleteri- ous materials are removed prior to placement. 5.9 Soil Expansion Characteristics The onsite materials are considered to be low expansive in nature. Pre- liminary foundation designs are provided to accommodate this condition. However, as-graded expansive conditions should be confirmed upon completion of grading operations. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 7 July 26, 2000 5.10 Import Soils Import soils, if needed, should have very low to low expansion properties. The soil engineer should be notified at least 48 hours in advance in order to sample, test and approve or disapprove materials from borrow sites. No import materials should be delivered for use on the site without prior approval by the soil engineer. 5.11 Compaction Testing Fill should be tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the required compaction is achieved. 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA Laboratory testing indicates the existence of onsite materials that are low in ex- pansion potential. Final expansion potential determinations for the subject lots will be dependent on the post-graded soil conditions. For preliminary design purposes, the following conventional slab-on-grade foundation design parame- ters and recommendations are presented. Prior to construction, the foundation plans should be reviewed by PSE. At that time, finalized recommendations/comments will be presented. 6.1 Preliminary Foundation Design Criteria Foundation systems may be preliminarily designed based upon the fol- lowing values. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 8 July 26, 2000 Allowable Bearing: 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Lateral Bearing: 200 Ibs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches plus 100 Ibs./sq.ft. for each additional 12 inches embedment to a maximum of 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Sliding Coefficient: 0.35 Settlement: Total = 3/4 inch Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet The above values may be increased as allowed by code to resist transient loading conditions, such as wind or seismic. 6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation Systems Conventional foundation systems may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with section 6.1 and Table B. 6.3 Retaining Walls Foundations with retaining walls may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with recommendations of paragraph 6.1 and the following: 6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Level Backfill Ka = 0.31 Kp = 3.25 K0 = 0.47 Equivalent fluid pressures can be calculated utilizing a soil unit weight of y = 125 Ibs./ft.3. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 TABLE B CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS Expansion Potential Soil Category Very Low to Low 1 Footing Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Finish Grade One-Story Interior One-Story Exterior Two-Story Interior Two-Story Exterior 12 inches 12 inches 12 inches 18 inches Footing Width One-Story Two-Story Footing Reinforcement One-Story Two-Story Slab Thickness Slab Reinforcement Under-Slab Reguirement Slab Subgrade Moisture 12 inches 15 inches Two No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom. Two No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom. 4 inches (actual) No. 3 rebar spaced 18 inches on center, each way. 2 inches of clean sand over 10-mil Visqueen, underlain with 2 inches of clean sand. Minimum of 110 percent of optimum moisture prior to placing con- crete. Footing Embedment Next to Swales and Slopes If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five (5) feet horizontally of the swale, the footing should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings adjacent to slopes should be embedded such that at least seven (7) feet is provided horizontally from edge of the footing to the face of the slope. Garages A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage en- trance, tying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness, reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 9 July 26, 2000 6.3.2 Other Design Considerations Retaining wall design should consider additional surcharge loads, where appropriate. 6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainage Systems Cantilever and/or restrained retaining walls should be waterproofed to accommodate the anticipated irrigation water and backfilled with free draining material (SE > 30) to within 18 inches of grade and compacted to project specifications to minimize water marks. Na- tive soils shall be utilized in the upper 18 inches. Drainage systems including, as a minimum, a four (4) inch diameter perforated drain line surrounded by three (3) cubic feet per lineal foot of three- quarters (3/4) inch to one (1) inch crushed rock wrapped with a suitable filter fabric, should be provided to all cantilever and re- strained retaining walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure. 6.3.4 Other Appurtenances PSE can provide geotechnical design parameters and subsurface drainage recommendations for pools, spas, flatwork or other hard- scape improvements upon request. 7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Positive drainage away from structures shall be provided and maintained. 7.2 Utility trench backfill shall be accomplished in accordance with the pre- vailing criteria of the City of Carlsbad. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 Page 10 July 26, 2000 7.3 Seismic design should be based on current and applicable building code requirements. 7.4 Soluble sulfate concentrations of the foundation material should be deter- mined after grading is complete, when the final distribution of onsite mate- rial is known. Preliminary chemical analyses are presented on Plates C-1 through C-5. Specific recommendations with respect to concrete specifi- cations and cathodic protection should be determined by a corrosion engi- neer. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 Page 11 The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the specific excavations and observations as noted. The materials immediately adja- cent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics and no rep- resentations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Respectfully PACIFIC SOILS? CAMERON Civil Engineer JObfN A. HANSON, CEG 990 Vice President Dist: (6) Addressee CER/JAC/J AH: KR/0000 ERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST EXP. 1/31/01 Reviewed by: PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. APPENDIX Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 REFERENCES ICBO, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California: International Conference of Building Officials, 3 volumes. Tan, S. S., and Kennedy, M. P., 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestern part of San Diego County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, open file re- port 96-02. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS ,ROUP lYMBOLS TYPICAL NAMES FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES I I i 3 .C GW We!l-grode<! grovels, gnovel lorxl mc.tures, link or no fines Wide range groin sizes ond substantial amounts of ol) intermediole particle sizes GP Poorly-groded grovels, grovel-sand miitures, little or no fines Predominotely one sue or o range of tiiei with tome intermediate siies missing GM Silly grovels, grovel-sond-silt mixtures Nonplostic tines or fines wrth low plasticity (tor identi- proceduret Me ML below) GC Clayey grovels, grove I- sond -sM mixtures Plastic fines (hx identification procedures s«e CL bek>w) SW Well-groded tonds, gravelly sonds, little or no fines Wide range in groin sizes ond substantial amounts of all intermediate particle sins SP Poorly • graded sonds, gravelly tands, little or no fines Predominately one size or a range of sizes with some intermediate sues missing SM Silly sands, sand-sill miitures Nonptoslic fines or fines with low plasticity (for identification procedures see ML betow) sc Clayey sonds, sand-clay mijtunjs Ptaslic fines (for identification procedures see CL below) IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES on fraction imall« man No. 40 sieve size I I8 Dry Strength (crushing characteristics) I I *" y. 1* !!</j ** ML Inorganic silts ond fine sonds, rock flour silly or clayey fin* sonds or clayey silts with slight plasticity. None to slight CL ic day* of bw to medium plasticity, gravelly days, *ondy cloys, »ilty day*, lean days Medium to high OL Organic sHts ond organic silty ckjyl 0* bw plasticity Slight to MH Inorganic lilts, micaceous or diotomoceous fine sandy or silly soils, elastic tills Slight to medium CH Inorganic cloys at high plasticity, tot clays High to very high OH Organic cloys of medium 1o high plasticity, organic tilts Medium to high Dilalancy (reaction to shaking) Ouic* to stow e to verytbw Slow Stow to none None tostew Toughness (consistency near PL) None Medium Slight to medium Slight to medium High Slight to medKjm HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PI ond Other highly organic Readily IdeMilitd by color, odor, ipongy, fwt ond frequently by fibrous texture BOUNDARY <XASSJfKATVONS Safe pooevwxj c*TQroc1iri*hCi o< two groups arc Oesxjncrtrt by tcrr*br<3l<m of group tymbc**. PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS SILT OR CLAY SAND FINE MEDIUM COARSE GRAVEL FINE COARSE COBBLES 1 BOULDERS1 No 2OO No40 No O Na4 V4i US STANDARD SIEVE SIZE (Cm) CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION GRANULAR SOIL COHESIVE SOIL BEDROCK MOISTURE CONDITION OTHER SYMBOLS Very soft Sofl Firm Stiff Very «tiff Hord T>» Unlma Sal CbMfcatvin SyKvn, CVM of US- Arm) V~^cO Mtmtxrdum (to J' Vsry loose LOOM Moderately dense Medium dense Den*e Very dense Soft Moderately hord Hord Very hord Dry Slightly moist Moist Wei Saturated R- Undisturbed sample B- Bulk sample 2 Groundwater 0. Groundwater seepage (FI»U*d Afnl, I960) PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. | PLATE A Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 Work Order 400739 Date Excavated 06/27/00 Excavated by CR Equipment John Deere 31OE w/ 24" Bucket TABLE I LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-1 0.0-8.0 SM TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): light brown silty, fine to medium sand, dry, moderately dense; common rootlets; visible pores to 1mm; un- common krotovina. @ 2.0 ft. red brown; uncommon rootlets; no krotovina; medium dense, moist; uncommon pinhole porosity; massive. @ 3.5 ft. medium dense to dense, moist to very moist. TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING TP-2 0.0 - 3.0 SM TOPSOIL : dark brown silty, fine to medium sand, moderately dense, moist to very moist; common rootlets. 3.0-7.0 SM TERRACE DEPOSIT (Qt): red brown silty, fine to medium sand, medium dense, moist to very moist; massive. TOTAL DEPTH 15.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400739 July 26, 2000 LABORATORY ANALYSES The following laboratory tests were performed on representative samples in accordance with the latest standards from the ASTM and the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Compaction Characteristics Laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content determinations were made in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557 utilizing the bulk samples obtained from representative soils and bedrock types to determine their compaction characteristics. Results of these tests are presented in Table II. Direct Shear Determinations Direct shear tests were performed on "undisturbed" samples and samples which were remolded to 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density in accordance with ASTM:D 3080. Prior to testing, the samples were inundated under confinement for approxi- mately 24 hours. Tests were made under various normal loads at a constant rate of strain of 0.05-inch per minute. Shear test data is presented in Table II, Plate B-1 and Plate B-2. Swell Tests Expansion characteristics were determined in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. The results are presented in Table II. Hydrometer Analyses Hydrometer grain size analyses were performed on the minus No. 10 sieve portion of the samples in accordance with ASTM:D 422. These tests were used as an aid in soil classification. The results of these tests are shown on Table II. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. COUJi_ O— H - 5 SDCO CO§i«1x§5K2 CO"0 UJ UJg-JLU9zott < UJ"•9.z0_«"-UJ COI °-o """uIB?<°0O. = CDX DUJ ? in5§~3dg.0 in c £ i5°?« g — | £111= zg_5 = lssgog- UJen Q O COo «*w3og£ Q- z CO M 1111 >- ooSg.Ul g0 <CO Uj|_= S-Z H 3 Ul —7n H t- s?. i2z —Soo5" K>|r^gssZ U 111 —— a sUJi-§Kz2=>U1_ P«zt.Si8 iiff<l-s° §1a;5 <=«DESCRIPTION0V) !£s£ oza:om 0)JCO«oo *- 0 00h. O O (1o> U) O> T- s.CO Ity Sand (Qt)CO .» ^_ Q.H ix:Ot*So CO C4 atr- T- o o 00 2 ^ 2CO Sand (Topsoil)£ CO - M ai- ujC U)c'Ca>a>c '5)cUJ o CO o (0a. DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED® 90% 3 7c;n, /ou 3 cnn,ouu S ocn,/iOU 3 nnn,UUU 2 7c.n - -, / ou CN 2 cnnK_ .°uu _ COo _ _ — o ocn - - -m A^OU _ _ CO ~LUiv o nnn -Li. ^UUU CO n^ -r? 1 yc;n - - - -<. 1 1 / OULU : ~X CD 1 cnn - -- ^-I.OUU 1 9c;n - - -i nnn -- ' -l.uuu yen •41 - cnn -- o^n - - - 0 . " ~ I" F _; _ " * E I i-- -_ . , __ — ___. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2 Silty Sand (Qt) SM symbol boring depth (ft.) symbol boring depth (ft.) • TP-1 5.0 w Hm COHESION 0 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 33 degrees DIRECT SHEAR TEST ^91 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. £jkl 7715 Convoy Court, S.D.CA 921 11 ^91 (619)560-1713 ^S§ W.0. 400739 PLATE B-1 DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% 4 OOfl 3 ~7cr\ _ „ „,/ou - 3 cnn - . —,OUU 3 onn ....,ZOU 3 nnn - - - - —,UUU 2 -7cr\ - -,/OU CJ " _ _ 2 cnn - -,bL)U i^ Q _ _ _-— o oc;n -f/) z.^DU _ ^ _ , CO LLJiv o nnn - - - - - - • -• •r~ Z.UUU CO ry' _ _ _ _ ~p -1 7KO - - -< 1,/OU - LLJ " I I _ T „ _ <*> * cnn " „___ ___L. : i----^ -I,OUU •1 oc;n -1 ,ZoU •1 nnnI,UUU vc;n - - f/ou cnn - -OUL) 1 ocn - - - --zou 0 _ __ : j ~l F -J I ~( F -i |T - 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2 Silty Sand (Topsoil) SM symbol boring depth (ft.) symbol boring depth (ft.) • TP-2 1.0 m[(K COHESION 0 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 32 degrees DIRECT SHEAR TEST SIB PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. •XI 7715 Convoy Court, S.D.CA 921 11 ^9fl (619)560-1713 ±al W.0. 400739 PLATE B-2 07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046 Del Mar Analytical 2852 AJion Avo.. Irvine. CA 92606 10M E. Cooley Dr.. Suile A. Collon. CA 92324 16525 Shornun Way, Sulle C-11. van Nuy:, CA92406 9<J6d CtiuiMpoake Or.. Sulle 805. San Oiogo. CA S2123 9830 South Sist St.. Sulle 6-120. Phoenix. A2 35014- (!KSl) ?6l-1022 FAX (943) 261.1SJS (909) 370-H6B7 PAX (9M) 370-1016 (618) 779-18" FAX (818) 779-lflO (619) 605-9MS FAX (619! 505-8609 (480) 7a5-0043 FAX (480) 785-0851 LABORATORY REPORT Prepared For:Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. I'll 5 Convoy Court San Diego, CA 92 111 Attention Ron Buckley Project 400739 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 Reported: 07/12/00 This laboratory report is confide ntial and is intended for the sole use of Del Mar Analytical and iis client. This en ti-e report was reviewed and approved for release. CA ELAP Certificate #1169 AZ DHS L.cense #AZ0062 el Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager TJie ristvlispcriah ontyIcthe*ampl& ic.tol inlhchboroicry. Thisrepurishut!not kcreproduced, tictpt in full, vilhoui *riiknpcrm:iiianfrom Del Mar Analytical. Plate C-1 CJF040K1 of S> D7/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046 - Del Mar Analytical 2652 Alien Ave.. Irvine. CA 92606 (949) 261-1022 FAX (949) 261.1226 . 101C E. Cooloy Dr., Suite A, Colton. CA 92324 (909) 370-1667 FAX (90!1) 370-1016 16525 Shivmnn Way. Suite C-11. Van Nuys. CA 9240C (816) 779-1044 TAX (618) 779-1643 9404 Chesapeake Dr.. SuHu 805, San Diego. C/\ 921J3 (61B) 505-9596 FAX (619) SOS-968S 9330 Soulll Slsl Si.. Suite B-120. Phoonix, &Z 85014 (480) yaS-OO-O FAX (480) 765-0651 Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. 77)5ConvovCourt San Diego, CA 92111 Attention: Ron Buckley Client Project ID: 400739 Report Number: CIF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 Vnalyte INORGANICS Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data Method Batch Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers I >H Units pH Units Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@5' - Soil) )H EPA9045C IOG063*; NA mg/kg Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@5'- Soil) :hloride EPA 300.0 IOG054:: 5.0 Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@5' - Soil) Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOG103!1. 700 1 7/6/00 7/6/007.8 mg/kg 15 1 7/5/00 7/5/00 <ihms/an ohms/cm 3200 10 7/10/00 7/10/00 H Sample ID: CJF0401-01 (TP-1@5' - Soil) Soluble Sulfatc EPA 300.0 Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil) pH EPA 9045 C Sample ID: CJT0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil) Chloride EPA 300.0 IOG054;. 0.00050 pH Units IOG063t NA mg/kg IOG0542 5.0 0.0058 pH Units 7.5 mg/kg 15 7/5/00 7/5/00 7/6/00 7/6/00 7/5/00 7/5/00 H )d Mar Analytical, Colton eanne Shoulder 'reject Manager 77ie rtnltspertuin unly 10 the samples te.-tetl in the laboratory. Tins repan xhull not be reproduced, acupi in full, v/llhoiif^riiicnpvm.stloirtfrom Del Mar Analytical, Plate C-2 CJF040J <2 of 5> WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046 Del Mar Analytical JSM Alien Me.. Iruini;, CA 92606 10U E. Cooley Dr.. Suilt A. Colton. CA8232^ 15525 Sherman Way. Suite C-11, Van Nuya. CA 9240G 9*81 Ctiesaoealie Dr.. Sur'io 60S, San Diegc, CA 52123 9830 Soutn 51 si Si.. Suite B-120. Phoenix. A2 85014 IfflUUJ (9*9) 261-1022 FAX (940) 261-1220 (909) 370-4667 PAX (903! 370-104& (816) 779-1841 FAX (BIB) 779-19J3 (619) 505-9596 FAX (619) 505-9659 (430) 785-0043 FAX (4»0) 765-0851 i\ls Engineering, Inc. voy Court i.CA 92111 Ron Buckley Clienl Project ID: 400739 Report Numbc::: CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 INORGANICS Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data Method Batch Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers tihms/cm : CJF0401-02 (TT-2@V - Soil) EPA 120.1 MOD. IOG103.J 700 ohms/cm 3100 10 7/10/00 7/10/00 . CJF0401-02 (TP-2@1' - Soil) ate EPA 300.0 100054:1 0.00050 0.0048 1 7/5/00 7/5/00 tlytical, Colton der ger TTic rcfH/ttpertain only I nhc sample] nxid in the I. iborarory. Tliis report .\hull not be repndiKKl, except in full, vilhoul vriiicnperm sston from Ret Mar Analytical. Plate C-3 CJF0401 < 3 of 5> 07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX- 9093701046 ^l£| UUO r Del Mar Analytical 2852 Allen Ave.. Irvine. CA 92606 101* E. Cooley Or.. Suilt A. Cotton. CA 92324 16S2S Snomian Way. Sulie C-ir Van Nuys. CA sa»OG 9484 Ch0380eaxe Dr.. Suite 805. San Diege. CA 32123 . 9830 SouW 5Ui Si...Sulie B-120. Phoenix, A2 650-U (9<19) 261-1022 PAX (940) 261-1220 (909| 370-4667 PAX (9091 370-104C (S18) 779-1844 FAX (818)779.18/13 (619) 50S-9SS6 FAX (619) SOS-9589 (*80) 785-0043 FAX (4*0) 785-0851 r.-• Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. 7715 Convoy Court San Diego, CA 92111 Attention: Ron Buckley Client Project ID: 400739 Report Numbc:- CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 Analytc Method INORGANICS Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data Batch Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers uhms/cm Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@r - Soil) Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOG103J 700 ohms/cm 3100 10 7/10/00 7/10/00 Sample ID: CJF0401-02 (TP-2@V - Soil) Soluble Sulfaie EPA 300.0 100054!! 0.00050 0.0048 7/5/00 7/5/00 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager The results pvtaln only imhc.\amplci uxed in the I.iboraiory. TliiJ report.ihull not be reproduced, except in full, Mltioul *riticnpcrm sstonfrom Ret Mar Analytical. Plate C-3 CJF0401 <3 of S> 07/12/00 WED 15:19 FAX 9093701046 Del Mar Analytical •»-»-» PSE1-SD J UU<J 2852 Alion Ave.. Irvine. CA 93606 10H E. Cooley Or., Suite A. Collon. CA 02321 165E5 Sherman Way. Suite C-11, Van Nuys, CA 8240G 9<8d Ches.-ipoJke Or.. Sulie 805, S=n Dleoo. CA 921S3 9930 South 51st St.. Suiir B-1ZO. Pnoenix, A2 8SO" (94S) 2G1-10JJ FAX (9*9) 2K1-1226 (909) 370-1667 FAX (<!09.l 370-10<>E (816! 779-1644 PAX (8181 779-1W3 (619) 50S-959G FAX (6191 505-9689 (480) 76S-0043 PAX |460) 781-0651 Pacific Soils Engineering, line. 7715 Convoy Court SanDiego,CA92111 •Attention: Ron Buckley Client Project IE: 400739 Report Number: CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 INORGANICS Analyte Batch: IOGOS42 Extracted Result 07/OS/OO Blank Analyzed: 07/05/00 (IOG0542-BLK1) Chloride ND Soluble Sulfstc ND UCS Analyzed: 07/05/00 (10GOS42-BS1) Chloride 45.7 Sojuble Sulfhle 0.00975 Matrix Spike Analyzed: 07/05/ )0 (IOG0542-MS1) Chloride Soluble Sulfatc 53.3 0.0128 Reporting Limit 5.0 0.00050 5.0 0.00050 5.0 0.00050 Matrix Spike Dup Analyzed: 07/05/00 (IOG0542-MSDI) Chloride 52.9 Soluble Sulfstc 0,0128 Batch: TOGO636 Extracted: 07/06/00 Duplicate Analyzed: 07/06/00 Batch: IOG1038 Extracted: 5.0 0.00050 IOC0636-DUP1) 7.80 07/10/00 Duplicate Analyzed: 07/10/00 ( Resistivity Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager OCJ038-DUP1) 3050 NA 700 Spike Source %REC RPD Data U:i!ts Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifiers n\g/kg 50.0 % 0,0100 91.4 97.5 90-110 90-110 Source: JJF1020-02 ng/kg 50.0 ND 100 80-120 % 0.0100 0.0026 102 80-120 Source: IJF1020-02 50.0 ND 99.4 80-120 0.0100 0.0026 102 80-120 Source: CJF0401-01 pW Unite 7.8 Source: LJGOOI5-01 ohiis/cm 3000 0.753 0 20 20 1.65 20 The raulis pertain only to ihc sumpla used In (Ac /. ihnruiory. Tills rtpori y hull not be rcpivduc tcl. fvil. vHhoutvriiicnpa-msf ton from ftelMur Analytical, Plate C-4 CJF0401 <4 of 5> r 07/12/00 WED 15:20 FAX 9093701046 Del Mar Analytical 2S52 Allen Ave.. Irvine. CA 9260e 10U E. Coclay Dr.. Suilc A. Collon. CA e232<i 16525 Shnrman Way. Suilc C-11, Van Nuye, CA 9W06 9484 Chesapeake Dr.. Suiio H05. San Diego. CA 02123 0830 SoulK Sis! Si.. Suite 6-120. Phoorlx, A2 55014 I£J UUO -1022 FAX (Oi.0) 261-1220 (9091 370-4SS7 FAX (909) 370-104G (818) 779-16M PAX (818) 779-1S13 (618) 50G-OS96 FAX (619) 500-5689 (480) V8S-0043 FAX (A80) 78S-OB51 Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. 7715 Convoy Court San Diego, CA 92111 . • Attention: Ron Buckley Client Project ID: 400739 Rep on Number: CJF0401 Sampled: 06/27/00 Received: 06/30/00 DATA QUALIFIERS AND DEFINITIONS H Sample analysis performed past method-specified holding time. ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit or MDL, if MDL is specified. NR Not reported. '• RPD Relative Percent Difference Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager « ritultspcrian unly 101he jamplts rested in ihc laboratory. This rtpi"'ifhall not k( reproduced, except in full, without •Hr'uicnpcrm.s.ilon from Del Mar Analytical. Plate C-5 CJF0401 < 5 of 5> PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS These specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements for the development of the project. These specifications shall be the project guidelines for earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling agency. I. GENERAL A. The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. B. The project Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall provide testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. C. All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be accomplished by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. D. It is the Contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fills to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil Engineer. The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil Engineer to be unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill. E. The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills. H. SITE PREPARATION A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials determined by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted fills shall be removed and wasted from the site. Where applicable, the Contractor may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for the project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in designated areas onsite. After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as recommended by the Soil Engineer/Engineering Geologist. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 2 B. . After the removals as delineated in Item II, A above, the exposed surfaces shall be disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. The prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture condition, mixed as required, and compacted and tested as specified. In areas where it is necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to placing fill, it 'will be the contractor's responsibility to notify the proper authorities. C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer and/or the controlling agency for the project. DDE. COMPACTED FILLS A. Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill, provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer. Deleterious material not disposed of during clearing or demolition shall be removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer. B. Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken offsite, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. D. All fills, including onsite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved prior to importation. E. The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compacted shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture condition and a uniform blend of materials. All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction cannot be attained. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 3 F. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below the limit specified by the Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blended until a uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved. Where the moisture content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the limits specified. G. Each fill layer shall be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer. In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer to the contrary, the compaction standard shall be ASTM:D 1557-91. H. Where a slope receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to one-vertical, the fill shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer. I. Side hill fills shall have a minimum key width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil Engineer in the field. J. Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist. K. The contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization fills as directed by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing agency for the project. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure which produces the designated result. L. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or creep material into rock or firm material; and the transition shall be stripped of all soil or unsuitable materials prior to placing fill. The cut portion should be made and evaluated by the Engineering Geologist prior to placement of fill above. M. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer. Finished surfaces of these pads may require scarification and recompaction. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 4 IV. CUT SLOPES A. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes and shall be notified by the Contractor when cut slopes are started. B. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to treat these problems. C. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face the same direction as the prevailing drainage. D. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. E. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer or Engineering Geologist. V. GRADING CONTROL A. Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer and/or his representative during the progress of grading. Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to evaluate the compaction and moisture compliance of each layer of fill. Density tests shall be performed at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative. B. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed over an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Where the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture content and density of the fill are within the limits previously specified. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 5 D. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded area until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. E. Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling and compacting operations in order that he will be able to state in his opinion all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved specifications. F. After completion of grading and after the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be submitted. No further excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior notification of the Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist. IV. SLOPE PROTECTION All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted and/or protected from erosion in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL TYPE A PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL -^NATURAL GROUND —-»—BEDROCK TYPICAL BENCHING SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "A" (PLATE G-2 ) NOTE: FINAL 20 OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED TYPE B PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL -NATURAL GROUND COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE} TYPICAL BENCHING BEDROCK SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "B"(PLATE G-2 ) NOTE.-FINAL 2O OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED PLATE G-/ PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W. O. DATE CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS ALTERNATE I PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL e in FILTER MATERIAL UIN.VOL. Of 9 FT. /LIN. FT. A-l 6 IN. 0 ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE WITH UIN. 8 PERf',1/4 IN 9 PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF Of PIPE. ASTU D^r5l, SDR 35 Off ASTU D3034, SDK 35 OR T/W DI527, SCHD.4O ASTU DI785, SCHD.40 12 IN. UIN. 6 IN UIN igr 6 IN MIN e-/ FOR CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF5OO FEET USE 8 IN. 0 PIPE 6 IN. UIN. OVERLAP A-2 ALTERNATE 2 FILTER MATERIAL WRAPPED IN FABRIC I IN. MAX GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC I IH. MAX.GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 9 FT. /FT. MIR API HO FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT (TYPICAL) e IN. UIN. /OVERLAP B-2 PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINAL FOR ALTERNATES A2 AND B2' NATIVE BACKFILL IOFT.+ <£ 15 FT 5 FT UIN 20 FT UIN. _UIRAFI 140 FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 'I IN MAX. OPEN GRADED GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT NON-PERF PERF 6 IN. 6 IN. f UIN ff UIN PIPE 6 IN HIN OVERLAP ALTERNATE 3 PERFORATED PIPE SURROUNDED WITH FILTER MATERIAL 6 IN.MIN OVERLAP e IN UIN COVER 4 IN M/N.BEDDING FILTER MATERIAL 9 FT'/FT A-3 PERFORATED PIPE 6 IN t < IN. UIN BEDDING B-3 FILTER MATERIAL SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING I IN. IN. 3/8 IN. NO. 4 HO. 6 NO.30 NO. SO NO. ZOO 100 9O-IOO 40-IOO 25-40 18-33 5-IS O-7 0-3 PLATE C-2 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING INC. W.O DATE. oVI »M ») O£w*ji: o< 2 £ O fc~ — O<2 iVD5 -j -4c: CQ 0^ tJ\>•c\jX fv«0 0s 10«3fe% •• &8$*- . S|<VI Q ^lr>1i O ^\jt> ^i. ^ 1O^U)<lb S07J5V 3•0Q£ V)11 8£ ^Q. «.'t Q. O•^ t3»»*:c c 0*•*l^5§^«s0N S-s S»K t>fe «*J 1^^ .. «^Si& o^ SIi^5*ii i 0^§ ^1o^o 5. 1£ "* tl_J, 'C *5%n. -Ci «*'fi% ttii is??li ^^S^•^o7; o»J:5 0 V•£"?; *»«»o-». 8**> ofbackdraitnglnttr orIta onto pov^|s**§^^^S*;«> <» S^53^11*1£SffsN8 f m *c 5.» s «> CE^ «vi Cut Lot 5 mm. Unweothered Bedrock Overexcovdte ond Recompocl 3 min. Cut-Fill Lot (Transition) ,0\5 mm. Compacted Fill 1* • *3 mm. .Overexcavate and Recompoct Unweathered Bedrock 'deeper overexcavotion may be required by the soils engineer in steep cut-fill transition areas PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W. O. DATE PLATE 6-4 UJ »- O LU O Ucocoo "O O> "g '> _o u_ co Q_a:UJUJ2UJCO.J O CO o u_ u UJ Selective Grading Detail for Stabilization Fill Unstable Material Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope o<\J^S.10,^e /5 min. «£_ ^Ao^ Finished Ground '11111' n II KM I MM I'' IUKTT" I i| it i i > n i; I i* iiV^T/Hfpiiiindiiiii nmji**"'1'"" ^^'&^X 'Compacted Fill Unweathered Bedrock or approved material ~L,-,;f/y/etf fcocA- Imin.) If recommended by the soils engineer'/geologist, the remaining cut portion of the slope may require removal and replacement with compacted fill (See Plate G~3) NOTE-' I. Subdrains are not required unless specified. 2. "w" shall be equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For slopes greater than 25feet "w"'shall be determined by the project soils engineer/geologist. At no time shall "w" be less than H/2. PLATE G-7 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W.O DATE s CO CDi8? Uj - o UjQ: ftkikiCB5 ki-so O oDQ. O X)O &! _D"5. O•*^<b-Q ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL FINISH GRADE CLEAR AREA FOR FOUNDATIONS, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS I 10' or os described by report SLOPE: FACE ' <—' I WINDROW ' (TYPICAL) NOTE: IF NECESSARY, OVERSIZED MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE 15 FOOT ZONE WITH SPECIAL EOUIPMENT> SUCH ASA ROCK RAKE PRIOR TO PLACING THE NEXT FILL LIFT. TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (END VIEW) HORIZONTALLY PLACED COMPACTED FILL GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED^ TO FILL VOIDS NOTE: COMPACTED FILL SHALL 8E BROUGHT UP AT A HIGHER ELEVATION ALONG WINDROW SO GRANULAR SOIL CAN BE FLOODED IN A "TRENCH CONDITION". PROFILE VIEW !iisiii=111=111 •s)n=m=n[=iii=i/i=)u PLATE C-fO PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. W.O..DATE. *^a-. o-II -£ P E gC;C 'g §-S ^o <->S «j< V) r\t "vi ."> .CvT %^-O «JOD^^ £ «J-Q «> 3 § 1! 8£ 55 -SI So o fc <J£§ o^ o 5 o AUG-14-2001 TUE 09:10 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 09 Citv of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: CHESTNUT HOMES ________ Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: Residential Additions: CB004801 1345 CHESTNUT AVENUE 205-210-09 CHESTNUT HOMES LLC SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED WOOD FRAME Number of New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 3219 SF Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: ITS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD "arlsbad Unified School District XXX(729-9291) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Enctmtas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of ApplicanVOwners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and fhat the Owner wilt file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit Is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of Ihe above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of Ihe Owner Signature:Date: 1 635 Faraday Avenue • Cartsbad, CA 920O8-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 Revistd 4/20/00 \ 01-29-2002 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR02028 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1345 CHESTNUT AV CBAD Permit Type: PCR Parcel No: 2052100900 Lot#: Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: Reference #: CB004801 Project Title: CHESTNUT HOMES -REVISION REMOVAL OF SHEAR PANEL 0 NEW Applicant: GRAY TODD 339 FOREST PLACE VISTA CA 92083 760-940-9391 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Owner: GRAY TODD 339 FOREST PLACE VISTA CA 92083 760-940-9391 PENDING 01/18/2002 JM Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due: $120.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120.00 $0.00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 il. : PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK EST. VAL. Plan Ck. DepojiJ^ Validated By_ Date / / Address (include Bldg/Suite tt)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total tt of units Assessor's Parcel tt Existing Proposed Use Description of Work ^?Zi : CONTACT PERSON i(if different jfrom applicant) ^ Tbe>O SQ. FT.#of Stories e-v tt of Bedrooms tt of Bathrooms Name ~ Address City 3. APPLICANT ;!;;[E];:Gpntractori "Eli;Agent: f or-Gbntractor Q Owner Q Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone tt Fax tt Name Address City "PROPERTY OWNER State/Zip Telephone tt Address City State/Zip Telephone #Name 5: CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars |$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone fe COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: |~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. D I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS l$100| OR LESS) n CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUiLbERitiECLARAfibN I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES [~|NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR /VCW-/?£S/0SV7Mi BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S ADDRESSLENDER'S NAME ' & APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commencedwithin 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commengfidJo^a-S&nrad of Ig^flays (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE \ / J^ ^^^ ^-^Z^^ ~~> DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance r/ ' EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 01/25/02 Q^EEiJCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 Rev 1 (Per 02-28) SET: I PLAN REVIEWER PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 a FILE PROJECT NAME: Chestnuts Homes (Units A SB B) I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply • with the jurisdiction's building codes. | The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. I I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephoned Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Please slip-sheet the revised sheets 6,7 & 8 into city and job site approved sets. By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC LOG tmsmU.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 •* (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 ^ JH Carlsbad 00-4801 Rev 1 (Per O2-28) 01/25/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Rev 1 (Per 02-28) PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4801 DATE: 01/25/02PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh BUILDING ADDRESS: MS. Map #00-06 Parcel 3 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Removal of braced panel Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq. Ft.) cb RIHn Pprmif FPP hv Orrlinanrp ^T Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $240.00 Type of Review: D Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other. r—i Hourly Structural Only Hours * Esgil Plan Review Fee $192.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: macvalue.doc Sheet 1 of 1 Q2"I- OT LU|fcifc a Q-lu O a:<IDICO52ii<;fco O I HI Oa. O a: a . QDQi