The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1360 KNOWLES AVE; ; CB043379; PermitA~-- '' 05-04-2005 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB043379 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: 1360 KNOWLES AV CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: ISSUED 1562313400 Lot #: 0 Applied: 08/27/2004 $50,480.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: SB Reference #: Plan Approved: 11/24/2004 1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 11/24/2004 2 Bathrooms: 2 Inspect Area: PC KING RES 2059 SF MFR HOME Orig PC#: 440 SF STICK BUILT GARAGE Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: KING ARTHUR P C&CAROL A KING ARTHUR P C&CAROL A 387 NUTW000 ST 387 NUTWOOD ST BREACA 92821 BREACA 92821 Building Permit $357.91 Meter Size Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $232.64 Meter Fee $220.00 Add'I Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $3,206.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $5.05 PFF $918.74 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $848.06 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $474.70 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $535.30 BTD #2 Fee .. $0.00 Sidewalk Fee - $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 . PLUMBING TOTAL $133.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL' $60.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $37.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee " $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee .$6,748.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Meter Size Dl - Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $354.35 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 r Sewer Fee $927.00 Additional Fees $732.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $15,789.75 Total Fees: $15,789.75 Total Payments To Date: Balance Due: $5,743.00 7503 05/04/05 0002 01 02 COP 5743.00 FINALAPPROVAL. Inspector: Date: 7 Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'feeslexactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 6602a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given p NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviously otherwise expired. 9 n FOR OFFICE USE-ONLY PERMA , A PL~~I~ 6A.0N PLAN CHECK NO'1 17 7 EST. VAL. CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Plan Ck. VandatDa J/d3I 1!ROiECWINM TION.. - - - - - O 2 2364 Y Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address( V,o Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use I - 2 N Description of Work SQ. FT.I/O #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms 2*L4O 'jE2 jQNTA SON (if diWerfrorn appiicarit Ex -160 — Name - Address City St e/iq Telephone ,# Fax # efit-Ad V ' - - YJ-JPLT 0 Contractcr 0 Agr Conti.ctcr D Ouar gnrlr Owner CJ3 2\z_ CA M-1-3 1LO •-3)3 Name . •". Address . City. State/Zip Telephone # \/1747-..PRoPthoWiR " A7&t.N C4e- 1 CAVLWi -S29-flcS Name " Address City State/Zip Telephone # f5. * (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to Construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law - (Chapter, 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). C.C)\St, J/3 'ys'-c4 Name .. - Address ' City State/Zip Telehone # State License#?'.2 9 License-Class City Business License # c--. / __°ot . (2A mm 9M CIL?i \ `031 Designer Name Address, City State/Zip Telephone State License # ORSLCOMfESJI9 * - Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations. C3 (have and will -maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company S'j't...Fit Policy '1o.t? 3 2/ } Expiration Date_________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) O CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION:.lcertify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100, addition t2 4e cost auonthmeges..as.provided for in Section 3706 of the a r code nterest and attorney's fees. SIGNATUR , DATE 3' NERrLD yror - - - 11 I hereby affirm that 606 exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: - o I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sac. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). - 0 I am exempt undr Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1.- personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES AND ((have / have not( signed an application for a buildingpermit for the proposed work. c. I have contracted with the following person (fir ml o. provjde the proposed Construction (includname /address / phone number /,contractors license number): ao Covs\ , tjoca 4.' I plan to provide portions of the work; but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / addriss / phone number / contractors license number(.- y- - 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name /address / phone number / type of work): —PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE T I' .r DATE — 2_T1- 2.CjQ%. - _E_ MF:WRm71TVZNiSY Is t ap licant or future building occupant required to submit a bUsiness plan, acutely haza ous materials registration form or risk management and prevention progr m nder Sections 25505, 2,5533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is thA aflity ant or future building occupant required torobtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO is th to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF A HE-ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATEOF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING'THE REQ NTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY. SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. S 1jRUcTION LENDING AGY - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending ag~ncy for the, -i performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code(. LENDER'S NAME '' LENDER'S ADDRESS LNI ec S - -. - - - - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City, ordinances' and State laws relating to building construction. 1 hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon theabove mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official uner the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from thedate• of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period-of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). 1.APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -_ DATE — - - -. - -, - - U WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance - - - - - UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE . INSPECTOR PERMIT # _k -i PLAN CHECK #_________ JOB ADDRESS ((eO owLS Al DESCRIPTION !4YLi COMMENTS Inspection List - Permit#: CB043379 Type: RESDNTL SFD KING RES. 2059 SF MFR HOME • 440 SF STICK BUILT GARAGE Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 06/29/2005 89 Final Combo PC AP 06/28/2005 89 Final Combo PC NR NOT HOME 06/28/2005 89 Final Combo . RI 06/24/2005 89 Final Combo - RI DID NOT SAY WHAT TYPE OF INSPECTION 06/24/2005 89- Final.Combo PY NR 06/07/2005 89 Final Combo PC CO SEE LIST 04/28/2005 39 FinalElectrical PC - PA RING OUT 04/18/2005 39 FinalElectrical PC PA EMR 03/24/2005 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PC AP 03/23/2005. 22 Sewer/Water Service PC AP 03/23/2005 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PC • NR 02/03/2005 13 Shear Panels/HD's PC AP GARAGES 02/03/2005 15 Roof/Reroof PC AP GARAGE 02/03/2005 18 Exterior- Lath/Dryvvall PC AP @ HOUSE 12/20/2004 62 Steel/Bond Beam PC - AP 12/17/2004 63 Walls • PC CA 12/08/2004 11 - Ftg/Foundation/Piers - PC AP UFER MISSING AT DETACHED GARAGE Thursday, June 30, 2005 . Page 1 of 1 C ONSTRUCTION 'TESTING &ENGINEERING& INC SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA ,. - SACRAMENTO, CA 2414 Vineyard Avenue 12155 Magnolia Avenue ' 1645 Pacific Avenue 242 W. Larch , 3628 Madison Avenue' Suite C Suite 6C' Suite 107 Suite F ' ' Suite 22 Escondido, CA 92029 Riverside, CA 92503 Oxnard, CA 93033' , (805) 486-9016 FAX - , Tracy, CA 95376 ' N. Highlands, CA 95660 (760) 746-4955 (951) 352-6701 (805) 486-6475, (209) 839-2890, ' (916) 331-6030 (760) 746-9806 FAX (951) 352-6705 FAX (209) 839-2895 FAX (916) 331-6037 FAX September 21, 2004' CTE'Job No. 10-7060G Mr. Steven Lutzke POB 231402 Encinitas, CA 92023 Subject: Review of Foundation Plan.- Garage to the Residence of: Arthur & Carole King 13,60 Knowles Avenue , Carlsbad, California Sheets 6 and 7, Prepared By Steven Lutzke Referenced Report: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed King Rssidence 1360 Knowles Avenue Carlsbad, California Mr. Lutzke: At your request, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc (CTE) has reviewed the foundation plan for the referenced project. The object of our review was to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations presented in our referenced geotechnical report. It is our conclusion that the reviewed foundation plan is in 'general conformance with recommendations presented in our referenced soils rèpdrt. Should you have any questions or need further information please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully. submitted, ' CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENG 0.2173 odne 241S4 y D. allard, GE 4#21173 Exp. 6/30/06 Principal Engineer '9F cM' GEOTECHINICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 9 SURVEYING earisbad 04-3379 9/9/04 EsGil Corporation In PartnérsFip u'itf Government for Bui(iing Safety DATE: 9/9/04 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3379 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1360 Knowles Ave. D APPLICANT O PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE SET:I PROJECT NAME: Foundation for Manufactured Home fi The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corpbration until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person fl rhe applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: I Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In PersonS REMARKS: Geotechnical engineer must review the foundation plan and provide the City with a letter stating that he has reviewed the foundation plans and they comply with the recommendations of the soil report prior to issuance of the building permit. See 5.16 of the soil report by Construction Testing dated 7/6/04 \'( By: Chuck Mendenhall . Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA [) MB LI EJ 0 PC 8/30/04 tmsmtl.dot Carlsbad 04-3379 9/9/04 . VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3379 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 9/9/04 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1360 Knowles Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.). Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Fdn 2200 City Est 50,480 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 50,480 Junsdiction Code 1cb IBy Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I 1 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: Complete Review Structural Only L1 Othér fl Repetitive Fee H Repeats Hourly Hour - * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $348.91 I $226.791 I • $195.391 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 2 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST •.:, , .." '.' DATE:2LA~l " S 'S PLANCHECK NO.: CB537' BUILDING AtDRESS: 17 k-e . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5. (v s .Ls E-b--e ASSESSOR'S. PARCEL NUMBER: tJi,5 - (1- 3 'f EST. VALUE.., :8ó ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL' .' '. DENIAL :.' "• ' The item you have submitted for review has been Please see \thSoo, attached report of deficiencies' approved. The approval is based on plans, . marked with Make necessary corrections to plans S.. information and/or specifications provided, in 'your ' or specifi tio s for compliance with applicable 5' submittal; therefore any changes to these items after , codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications,, must be . specifications to this office for review. ' S reviewed by this office, to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions' in this report can result in suspension, of permit to build. By Date :. g A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ' By: Date:, ' By: Date: S FOR OFFICIAL USE''ON5 ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT By Date Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 HWORD\DOC$\CI4KLS1'8uIIdb Panthed, Ckst Form (Generlc).doc . I . Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A.vNorth Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets . Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths Existing Street Improvements Existing or proposed sewer lateral Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E Easements . Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: . • •. ØDrainage Patterns — NCed 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or.an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive ' drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." • \\ 4L • Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography • Size, type, location, alignment of existing orproposed sewer and water service v e,2 (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an. exception. OSewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. • • 0 3. Include on title sheet: • A. Site address B Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description S . • S For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects"include: • total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, • S existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, S warehouse, office, .etc.) previously approved. S • S S • S EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Flanthedc adst Form (Geneflc).doc 2 • Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3rd DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE El 0 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ProjectNo.___________________________________________________ El El El 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad - Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 W x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS El El El 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: • Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:WORO\DOC$CMKLS1'.Bu1Iding PIandeck C*Jst Form (RIDDLE. HARVEY 7-12-00)4cc 3 Rev. 12/26/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3Rb S checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by. mail or fax are not ,accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: " Date: O 6b. Construction of the public' improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee 'of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This, agreement must be 'signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to' issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Enclosed' please find, your Future Improvement 'Agreement. Please return "agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: ' S Date: No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: 'Damaged or defective. imorovements found adiacent to buildina site must be reDaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for, a grading permit are found in 'Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 00 z( 0 , 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading Include accqrate grading quantities (cut, fill import export). 7b. Grading-'Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a reglstered Civil -5 k-t— Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form c?L attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. €Y ,c c3 ' -. Grading Inspector sign o by: S ' Date: cc 0 0 0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Not e: Pa celf7icio " if a grading permit is not required.) - e require:d eve H\WORDDOCS\,CMKLS1'\Buildlrw Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic 7-14.00).doc 4 Rev, 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD E E 7d No Grading Permit required. 13 4 (~ yJ 1f 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: fl.Fj 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad 'V sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: . E 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best Q~x 0S \t' management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of. grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. uired fees are attached U No fees required WATER METER REVIEW fl 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for • the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. HAWORDOOCSOMMUDOV Planthed, Cldst POnn (Geneflc).dec 5 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,1ST 2ND 3RD S If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then . S. owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons S per minute .(gpm). A typical fixturecount and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. S S • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the S S installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated S S demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit S multiple trenching into the street). S S S U fl 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) S r All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation, calculations (in gpm) prior S . to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow 5 these guidelines: 1. if the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on S S the improvement sheets: If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", S S and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should .• S •• S look like: • STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 5 5 5 5 • • L.j 5 5 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 5 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the 5 - - service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the. applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry S S Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once S you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for S - • your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line S . • Elevation at point of connection (POC) S • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) - - • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve S • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) S • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water Planthedc Mist Form (Gerreric).doc 6 Rev. 1114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching, these . irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is-available) ' Recycled water meters are sized the' same as the irrigation, meter above. If a project fronts . a street with recycled water, then they should, be connecting to this, line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is ..a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, 'the recycled water line is. charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. . 1ST 2ND 3RD 0 0 0 13. Additional Comments: . H:WORD'DOCS\CMKLST8id1dIng PIanedi Cldst Form (Geneslc).doc . 7 , . . . Rev. 7/14/00 =$oic DIST. #3 X FEE/EDU:______ HIGH /LOW_____ FEE/AC:_______ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .. FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Checked 0 Estimate based on-unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: (c3(,rD _iL?_*€- Bldg. Permit No. Ci3O3379 Drrr hw flfp. /2 / V Checked by: Date: I IVC4._. IJJ. __._. •1' _- -- -- - - -.. - EDUCALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: R.. Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units:____________ ADTCALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. FL/Units: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: I Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: FEESREQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) PARK-IN-LIEU FEE I — FEE/UNIT:_________ TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PARK AREA & #: X NO. UNITS: =s9 ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: AID/0 BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 ADTs/UNITS: X - FEE/ADT:________ FEE ZONE: / FACILITIES MANAGEMENT UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:________ SEWER FEE EDU's: - P41 EFIT AREA:•______ EDU's: ~ 6/ Y8EVVER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_______ Z8. ACRES: ___ . POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 o 2 - - F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.dOC Rev. 7/14/00 X FEE/EDU: __27 ME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Address /_0 /(itOtA)/1_ ,4i21L Planner Greg Fisher - Phone (760) 602- 4629 APN: Type of 'Prect & Use:•pJu) /-h).A4L_Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: General General Plan: /LLM. Facilities Management Zone: / CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit:________________________________________________ Legend: Item Complete El Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE ;,.. 4. DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO - TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: - Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES_ NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal-Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO %If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed; Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES - NO - (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES - NO (A/P/Ds: Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN; Enter Fee; UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 Site Plan: 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-wa'y width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). 0 0 2. Provide legal description of property and asessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines - 1. Applicability: YES NO 0 2 Project complies YES NO ''' ko CLfl17' (?*D iJ Zoning. ftiiP1t 0 1. Setbacks: / lm (L1VJ' Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required / Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Top of slope: Required Shown 0 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required - Shown Interior Side: • Required 37 Shown 6 Street Side: • Required • Shown Rear: • Required Shown -5 -/ Structure separation: Required • Shown 77 0 0 3 Lot Coverage Required Shown 4. Height: Required Shown D 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required , • Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown 0 Additional Comments P- :4- 4J€J2yj OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE_________ H:\ADM1N\COUNTER\BidgPinchkRevChkiSt • Rev 9/01 CONSTRUCT-ION TESTING & ENGINE'ER'ING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA SACRAMENTO, CA 2414 Vineyard Avenue 12155 Magnolia Avenue . 1645 Pacific Avenue 242 W. Larch 3628 Madison Avenue Suite G Suite 6C Suite 107 Suite F Suite 22 Escondido, CA 92029 Riverside, CA 92503 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 N. Highlands, CA 95660 (760) 746-4955 (909) 35276701 (805) 486-6475 . (209) 839-2890 (916) 331-6030 (760) 746-9806 FAX (909) 352-6705 FAX (805) 486-9016 FAX (209) 839-2895 FAX (916) 331-6037 FAX PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED KING RESIDENCE 1360 KNOWLES AVENUE• CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: MR; ARTHUR KING 387 NUT WOOD STREET• BREA, CALIFORNIA .92821 Prepared by: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDID, CA 92029. GTE JOB NO. 10-7060G JULY 6, 2004 GEOTECH14ICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • CC V m r lqfl.EL1SJ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INVESTIGATIONSUMMARY ...................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES....................................................................2 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................2 1.2 Scope of Services Provided................................................................................................2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................3 3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS...............................................................3 3.1 Field Investigation........................ ......................................................................................3 3.2 Laboratory Investigation ....................................................................................................3 4.0 GEOLOGY ..............................................................................................................................4 4.1 General Setting...................................................................................................................4 4.2 Geologic Conditions ..........................................................................................................4 4.2.1 Organic Topsoil..........................................................................................................4 4.2.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits ............................................... . ...................................... 4 4.3 Groundwater Conditions ............... ..................................................................................... 5 4.4 Geologic Hazards ............................................................................................................... 5 4.4.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation....................................................................5 4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting.....................................................................................5 4.4.3 Earthqiake Accelerations..........................................................................................6 4.4.4 Site Near Source Factors and Seismic Coefficients .................................................. 6 4.4.5 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation .....................................................6 4.4.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation ..............................................................................7 4.4.7 Landsliding orRocksliding ........................................................................................ 7 4.4.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils...........................................................................7 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... . ...................... ......... 8 5.1 Genera l ...................................... . .......................................................................................... 8 5.2 Grading and Earthwork......................................................................................................8 5.3 Site Preparation..................................................................................................................8 5.4 Site Excavation ..................................................................................................................9 5.5 Temporary Construction Slopes.........................................................................................9 5.6 Backfill Placement and Compaction................................................................................10 5.7 Fill Materials....................................................................................................................11 5.8 Slopes...............................................................................................................................11 5.9 Foundations and Slab Recommendations ......................................................................... 11 5.9.1 Foundations.............................................................................................................11 5.9.2 Foundation Settlement ............................................................................................12 5.9.3 Foundation Setback.................................................................................................12 5.9.4 Concrete Slabs .......................................................................................................... 13 5.10 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures...........................................................................13 5.11 Retaining Walls ............................................................................ .................................. 14 5.12 Exterior Flatwork...........................................................................................................14 I... I 5.13 Vehicular Pavements .14 5.14 Drainage ........................................................................................................................ ..15 I 5.15 Construction Observation ..............................................................................................16 ..................................................................................................................................17 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION ............................... . ................................................. 17 I FIGURES I FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 APPENDICES I . APPENDIX A APPENDIX B I APPENDIX C I I' I I' I 1'. * I, I I. SITE INDEX MAP EXPLORATION MAP 'REFERENCES CITED EXPLORATION LOGS LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 1 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No, 10-7060G INVESTIGATION SUMMARY This preliminary investigation was performed to provide site-specific geotechnical information for the proposed residential lot in Carlsbad, California. We conclude that the proposed construction on the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented into the design of the project. Based on our review, soils beneath the proposed structure consist of organic topsoil overlying Quaternary Terrace Deposits. These materials are composed dominantly of silty fine to medium sandstone and were found up to depths up to approximately five and a half feet below grade. Organic topsoils were found to depths up to two feet below grade (fbg). Based on our explorations, the underlying native materials are expected to be suitable for support of the proposed improvements. Groundwater was not encountered in any of our explorations to the maximum explored depthof five and a half fbg. Although groundwater levels will likely fluctuate during periods of precipitation, groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development if proper site drainage is maintained. With respect to geologic and seismic hazards, the site is considered as safe as any within the San Diego County area, a region of moderate to high seismic risk. Based on the geologic findings and reference review, no active surface faults are known to exist at the site. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone; the closest known active fault, lies approximately four and a half miles to the west. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 2 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad,California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Introduction Construction Testing and Engineering, Incorporated ("CTE") has prepared this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed residence in Carlsbad, California. Figure 1 is a map showing the general location of the site. It is our understanding that site improvements are to consist of a residential building pad and associated improvements. The approximate anticipated locations of the propose pad is shown on figure 2. The recommendations in this refort have been provided for the residential building. Our investigation included reference re'iew, field reconnaissance and exploration, laboratory analysis, geologic hazard evaluation, and engineering analysis. Specific recommendations for excavationsfill placement, and foundation design are presented in this report. Where cited, references are included inApendix A. I 1.2 Scope of Services Provided . I The scope of services provided included: ' Review of readily available geologic and soils reports pertinent to the site and adjacent areas. I . Exploration of subsurface conditiohs to depths influenced by the proposed construction. Laboratory testing of representative soil samples to provide data to evaluate the geotechnical design characteristics of the soils'. I Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site,. e Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements. Preparation of this summary report of the investigation performed including geotechnical I construction recommendations: ' I . , , Preliminary Geotechnical investigation - Page 3 Proposed King Residence I 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G U 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION I :The site is located at 1360 Knowles Avenue in Carlsbad, California. The proposed improvements consist of construction of a single-family residence. Figure 1 is a map showing the approximate I location of the site. Figure 2.shows the approximate location of the proposed improvements. Land use near the site 'consists generally of residential properties. Topographically, the site is I generally flat and is located at an elevation of approximately 120 feet above mean sea level (msl). I 3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS I 3.1 Field Investigation I Field investigations on this site, performed June 25, 2004, included site reconnaissance and the excavation of four backhoe test pits. Soils were logged and visually classified in the field using the I Unified Soil Classification System. The field descriptions have been modified, where appropriate, I to reflect laboratory test results. Test pit excavation logs including descriptions of the soil, in situ field-testing data, and supplementary. laboratory data are included in Appendix B. Figure 2 is a map I showing the approximate locations of the explorations conducted by this firm. I 3.2 Laboratory Investigation I Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples from the site for classification purposes and to evaluate physical properties and engineering characteristics. Laboratory tests for I grain-size analysis and classification were performed. Test method descriptions and laboratory results are included in Appendix C. I I : Prliriinary Geotechnical Investigation 'Page 4 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 4.0 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Setting The site lies within the' coastal area of northern San Diego County. Geomorphically, uplifted marine terraces dissected by intermittent streams characterize this area. In general, the site area slopes down to the west toward the Pacific Ocean. 4.2 Geologic Conditions ' According to Kennedy (1975), the site is underlain by units of the Quaternary Terrace Deposits. Based on our explorations, Organic topsoil Was found to overlie units of Quaternary Terrace Deposits. 4.2.1 Organic Topsoil A surficial layer of organic topsoil was found overlie much of the site. Topsoil material was generally grayish brown silty SAND. Topsoil was observed to a maximum depth of two feet below grade. ' 4.2.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits Terrace Deposits soils were encountered beneath the topsoils to the maximum depth explored of 5.5 fbg. These sedimentary deposits consist of medium dense to dense, slightly moist to moist, red to orangish red, silty fine to medium grained SANDSTONE with occasional iron nodules up to ¼" in diameter. ' ' Preliminary Geotechnica] Investigation Page 5 Proposed King Residence - I .1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 .. CTE Job No. 10-7060G I 4.3 Groundwater Conditions . . I - Groundwater was not encountered during our investigation of the site to the maximum depth of five and a half fbg. Furthermore, groundwater is not expected to affect the improvements if proper I surface drainage patterns are designed and maintained. I 4.4 Geologic Hazards S I 4.4.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From the reviewed references and our observations, it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated I . •ground motion waves. . I .4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our exploratory soil borings, and a review I of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known active fault traces. . . I '4 I The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately 7.5 kilometers to the west, is the closest known I . active fault (UCBO, 1997). Other principal active regional faults include: Coronado Banks, Earthquake Valley, Newport-Inglewood, Elsinore Fault zone, San Jacinto, and San Andreas I faults. According to the California Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is active if it . displays evidence of activity in thelast 11,000 years (Hart, 1994). I . - Preliminary Geotechniàal Investigation Page 6 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 4.4.3 Earthquake Accelerations Based on the site analysis, the maximum credible acceleration would be generated by a 6.9 magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault, located approximately four and a half I miles (7.5 km) from the site. I 4.4.4 Site Near Source Factors and Seismic Coefficients In accordance with the California Building Code 2001 edition, Volume 2, Figure 16-2, the I referenced site is located within seismic zone 4 and has a seismic zone factor of Z=0.4. The I nearest active fault, the Rose Canyon Fault, is approximately seven and a half kilometers to the southwest and is considered a Type B seismic source. Based on the distance from the I site to the Rose Canyon Fault, near source factors of Nv=1.1 and Nal.O are appropriate. Based on the subsurface explorations, the site has a soil profile type of Sc and seismic coefficients C=0.62 and Ca-0.40. 4.4.5 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation I Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine-grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths I . during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point-to-point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction I potential .varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable - . intensity, and duration of ground shaking. 0 Because of the generally dense nature of underlying materials and lack of a shallow I . groundwater table, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction damage to proposed improvements should be considered low. I •0 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation , Page 7 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 . - CTE Job No. 10-7060G Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densify during seismic events. Because the underlying site soil materials were generally found to be dense, the potential for seismic settlement should be considered low. 4.4.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation The potential for tsunami damage at the site should be considered remote due to the site's elevation (approximately 120 feet above msl) and distance from the Pacific Ocean (over one mile). The potential for seiche damage at the site should be considered low due to the site's proximity to the Pacific Ocean, I . 4.4.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding The site area is considered to be generally susceptible to landsliding (Tan and Giffen, 1995). However, active landslides were not encountered but have been mapped less than a mile east I of the site. In addition, site soils materials were not found to be prone to landsliding. Therefore, landslides are not considered a significant hazard within or immediately adjacent I to the proposed structures. . .. I 4.4.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils I .Topsoil materials should be considered compressible and, are therefore, not considered suitable, in their current state, for the placement of fill or structures. Based on the laboratory I testing, underlying formational materials should exhibit low expansion and compressibility I characteristics. The recommendations presented herein have been developed to mitigate the potentially compressible topsoil and fill materials at the site. I 1 :. Preliminary Geotechnical investigation Page 8 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July. 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General We conclude that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. Recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed improvements are presented below. 5.2 Grading and Earthwork CTE should continuously observe the,grading and earthwork operations for this project. Such observations are essential to identify field conditions that differ from those predicted by this investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to verify that the grading is in overall accordance with the recommendations of this report. Our personnel should perform adequate observation and sufficient testing off ills. during grading to support our professional opinion regarding compliance with compaction requirements and specifications. .5.3 Site Preparation Before grading, the site should be cleared of existing debris and other deleterious materials. I Competent native materials shall be exposed where slabs-on-grade are proposed. Where raised- wood floors are proposed, no subgrade removals are necessary. Organic materials not suitable for I • structural backfill should be disposed of off-site or placed in non-structural planter or landscape areas. Before placing fills, exposed, over-excavated areas should be scarified 12 inches, moisture I conditioned, and recompacted. The geotechnical consultant should evaluate the exposed subgrade to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 9 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G verify that mitigative measures (removal of inadequate soils, overexcavations and or benching subgrades) have been properly implemented. If encountered during excavation, irreducible materials greater than six inches in maximum dimension should not be used in fills on the site. Fills less than three feet from proposed pad grades should have no irreducible material greater than three inches in maximum dimension. In some instances, clayey native soils can be blended with granular soils and reused in non-structural areas. 5.4 Site Excavation Based on our observations, excavations in site materials are feasible with heavy-duty construction equipment. However, propose excavations deeper than approximately six fbg may require increased effort. 5.5 Temporary Construction Slopes Sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations are provided. The recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep-seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. Onsite soils are considered Type C soils with recommended slope ratios as set forth in Table 1 below. Prliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 S ' CTE Job No. 10-7060G According to Cal-OSHA regulations actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person". In addition, the above sloping recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic, equipment or materials, or adjacent foundations. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all unshored I slopes. 5.6 Backfill Placement and Compaction, The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation, including removal of unsuitable materials, has occurred before fill placement. Areas to receive fill should be scarified a minimum of 12 inches, moisture conditioned to slightly above optimum moisture content and properly compacted. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, as evaluated by ASTM D1557, at a moisture content between optimum and two percent above optimum. Backfill placed within th&upper foot beneath pavement areas should be compacted to 95% per ASTM D 1557. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil will be dependent on the type of compaction equipment • used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8-to 12-inches in loose thickness Backfill placement and compaction should be done in overall conformance with geotechnical recOmmendations and 'local ordinances. 5.7 Fill Materials Low expansiOn soils derived from the onsite materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill, provided they are screened of organic materials and materials greater than six inches in maximum dimension. Topsoils may be, blended with formational soils as directed by the geotechnical representative. Imported fill beneath, structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or equal to 30 (per UBC 18-I-13) with less than 35 percent passing the no. Pteliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page ii Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 200 sieve. Imported fill soils for use in structural or slope areas should be evaluated by the soils engineer to determine strength characteristics before placement on the site. I 5.8 Slopes . We recommend that any proposed cut or fill slopes be constructed at a maximum inclination of 2:1 I (horizontal: vertical) at a maximum height of 25 feet. Slopes constructed at such ratios will exhibit I .stability factors of safety equal to or in excess of 1.5 against deep-seated failures. Proposed slopes that exceed the recommendations presented above shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, upon I request. - 5.9 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following, recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. These recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthworks to. verify that conditions exposed are as anticipated. 5.9.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings are suitable for use at this site. We anticipate all building footings will be deepened to bear entirely in competent native materials. We anticipate foundations will require deepening to depths of 18 to 24 inches below existing grades. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 1500 pounds per square foot (psf). The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. I Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches wide and installed at least 18 inches below I the lowest adjacent subgrade and into competent materials. Isolated interior footings should I Pteliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, .2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G be 24 inches wide and installed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum footing reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of four #4 reinforcing bars, two placed near the top and two placed near the bottom. The project structural engineer should design reinforcement of isolated footings. 5.9.2 Foundation Settlement The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once actual foundation loads are known. In general, for the anticipated loads and bearing pressure the maximum total settlement is expected to be on the order of 'one inch. Differential settlement along continuous footings is expected to be less than 0.5 inches. 5.9.3 Foundation Setback . . I Footings for structures should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the face of nearby slopes to the outer edge of the footing is at least 10 feet. In addition, where a footing is near a utility trench or, other excavation, the footing base should extend beneath a one-to-one plane projected upward from the closest bottom corner of the adjacent trench or excavation. 5.9.4 Concrete Slabs Concrete slabs-on-grade should be at least 4.5 inches thick, with a minimum of No. 3 bars placed on 18-inch centers each way on 24-inch centers. All slab reinforcement should be supported to ensure placement near mid-height of the concrete. It should be noted that reinforcement requirements provided herein are not intended to supersede reinforcing that is recommended by the structural designer. Slab recommendations Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation . Page 13 I Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 . CTE Job No. 10-7060G U contained herein will not entirely control inevitable concrete shrinkage cracking. The. U . . occurrence of shrinkage cracks can be limited by placing low slump concrete, proper placement techniques, curing, and installation of appropriate crack control joints. 5.10 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures 1 . The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings and slabs at the site. Foundations I placed in firm, well-compacted fill or formational materials may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load) for I concrete cast directly against competent materials. A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with ii maximum value of 1200 pounds per square foot) may be used. The allowable lateral resistance can be taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two-thirds of the total allowable resistance. 5.11 Retaining Walls Retaining walls up to ten feet high and báckfilled using generally granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 2 below. TABLE2 EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHTS (pounds per cubic foot) WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) CANTILEVER WALL (YIELDING) . . - 38 . 60 RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 Pteliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 14 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July. 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G The values above assume non-expansivebackfill (Expansion index less than 30 according to UBC 18-2) and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. 5.12 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for distress to exterior flatwork caused by minor settlement of foundation soils, we recommend that such flatwork be installed with crack-cOntrol joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrade should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained adjacent to all flatwork. 5.13 Vehicular Pavements The upper foot of subgrade beneath proposed pavements and aggregate base materials should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 95010 of the laboratory determined maximum density. Pavements should be constructed according to industry standards. Preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on an estimated Resistance "R" Value. The asphalt pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual and on anticipated private residential traffic as indicated in Table 3 below. If these assumptions are incorrect, this office should be contacted to obtain further pavement recommendations. Upon completion of finish grading, "R" Value sampling and testing of subgrade soils can occur and the pavement section modified if necessary. PF'eliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 Page 15 CTE Job No. 10-7060G TABLE I- ON I PAVEN I DESIGN Traffic Area Assumed Estimated PCC Thickness AC Class II Traffic Thdex Subgrade R- (inches) Thickness Aggregate Base • ' Value (inches) Thickness (inches) 5.5' Residential Drives 4.5 34 ' - - 3.0 4.0 I . 5.14 Drainage Foundation and concrete-slab-on grade performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site.' This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. I - The ground surface- around structures should be gradedso that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to do this depends on the landscaping type. In general, the pavements and flowerIeds within five feet of buildings should slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of five I -percent away from buildings if doing so' is practical. Planters should, be constructed so' that water from them will not seep into the' foundation areas or I • beneath slabs and pavement.' In any event, the site maintenance personnel should be instructed to I . limit irrigation to the minimum actually necessary to sustain the landscaping plants properly. Should - • excessive irrigation, waterline breaks, or -unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones and - ' goundwater may develop. Consequently, the site should be graded so that water drains away - ' readily without saturating the foundation or 'landscaped ,areas or cascading over slope faces. A Pfeliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G potential source of water, such as water pipes, drains, and the like should be frequently examined for I signs of leakage or damage. Any such leakage or damage should be repaired promptly. The project Civil Engineers should thoroughly evaluate the on-site drainage and make provisions as necessary to I keep surface waters from affecting the site. I 5.15 Construction Observation I . The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions found in the exploratory locations. The interpolated and underlying subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated.. Recommendations provided in this repdrt are based on the understanding and ssumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for-the project. Earthwork should be observed and tested as necessary to verify that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. Footing excavations should be evaluated by the geotechnical representative to verify compliance with recommendations herein prior to footing material placement. 5.16 Plan Review CTE should review the project grading and foundation plans and specifications, with respect to geotechnical issues, before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in this report. Pteliminary Geotechnical Invesfigation Page 17 Proposed King Residence 1360 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, California July 6, 2004 CTE Job No. 10-7060G 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, l'aboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not oberved or described in this report may be encountered during construction. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Please call with any questions Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Dan T. Math, RCE #61013 Senior Engineer # %•( \ No. ç\tt 61013 Exp. i 12/31/04. ll' /14") I F. Lynch, CEG #1890 Senior Engineering Geologist JAY F' LYN No. 1ag II CERTIFIED \V%iNEERING GEOLOGIST-, TOPOI map printed on 06/30/04 from CaUfomia.jo" and 'LIntlthd.tpg' - SS. C2JV(J.VV LL/C2.VUU VU -2' ry LL/V.UUU VV vvlzltjF i1/iUUU W - \ ;/J kA 117'22.000'W se 117°21.000 W - 117°20.000 W - WGS84 117°1.UOO W Printed firê.T0P0I 02000 Wikjfbs,erPmdcl,on (www.thpo.com). - CONSTRUCTION TESTING & 20 FOOT CONTOUR ELEVATIONS REFERENCES CITED Hart, Earl W., Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42,. revised 1994. . Jennings, Charles W., Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs and Thermal Wells, revised 1987. Kennedy, Tan, 1975, "Geology of the Northern Portion of San Diego County, 7.5 Quadrangles, Del Mar Quadrangle, San Diego County, California", California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200, Sacramento, California. . Tan, S.S. and Giffen, D.G., 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, California, Poway Quadrangle," California Division of Mines and Geology.. . 'CONSTUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ,- \4 GEOTECI-INICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 92019(760)746-4955 ENGINEERJNGJNE, DEFINITION OF TERMS PRIMARY DIVISIONS I SYMBOLS. .. . SECONDARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS CLEAN A A. WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES MORE THAN GRAVELS F.ftW LITTLE OR NO FINES GP L' POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, In HALF OF <5% FINES COARSE LITTLE OF NO FINES GRAVELS IIWT' ri GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES, 50 us FRACTION us LARGER TI-IAN WITH FINES I4J1 4,IL NON-PLASTIC FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, NO 4 SIEVE GC 'PLASTIC FINES LITTLE SANDS CLEAN :.S~K WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, OR NO MORE THAN ' SANDS FINES , ' .•: POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR ó HALF OF <5% FINES - Sp .:•::: ::::: ' COARSE NO FINES SANDS J il l H ii SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON-PLASTIC FINES FRACTION IS SMALLER THAN WITH FINES CLAYEY SANDS SAND CLAY MIXTURES PLASTIC FINES NO. 4 SIEVE INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY SILTS AND CLAYS H OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS, SLIGHTLY PLASTIC CLAYEY SILTS " - C - INORGANI CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY, 'SANDY, SILTS OR LEAN CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS -LESS THAN a L S T 5 OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY ' Z '•ii -'4,'i.11' I I INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SILTS AND CLAYS' SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS (1H 7 -' INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS' LIQUID LIMIT IS GREATER THAN 50 ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, 0,1-I, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ' xxxxx PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GRAIN SIZES' SAND BOULDERS COBBLES SILTS AND CLAYS GRAcOSVEINE 1 00ARSE I MEDIUM I FINE - 12" 3" 3/4" ' 4 10 40 200 CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENING , U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 'ADDITIONAL TESTS (OTHER THAN TEST PIT AND BORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS) MAX- Maximum Dry Density - , PM- Permeability ' PP- Pocket Penetrometer GS- Grain Size Distribution SO- Specific Gravity - ,- WA- Wash Analysis SE- Sand Equivalent - . HA- Hydrometer Analysis DS- Direct Shear El- Expansion Index - AL- Atterberg Limits UC- Unconfined Compression CHM- Sulfate and Chloride RV- R-Value ' - MD- Moisture/Density Content, pH, Resistivity CN- Consolidation, M- Moisture COR - Corrosivity ' - ' SC- Swell Compression 01- Organic Impurities FIGURE] ELI /0 TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ,CONSTRUCT1ON C GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION (9 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONGIDO CA. 92029(760) 746-4955 ENGElEERDSRINC. PROJECT: DRILLER.: SHEET: of CTE JOB NO: DRILL METHOD: DRILLING DATE: LOGGED BY: SAMPLE METHQa ELEVATION: 0 - BORING LEGEND S Laboratory Tests I I DESCRIPTION - - - - - - Block or Chunk Sample - - - - .-4-- - Bulk Sample - - - . - - -4-- - Standard Penetration Test - - - / - - Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler) - - I ---- Thin Walled Army Corp of Engineers Sample.. - - - -15- - - i- - Groundwater Table -ne----- -- .. . --------------------------------------------------------------------- Change -20- - Formation Change [(Approximate boundaries queried. (2)1 - - SM Quotes are placed around classifications where the soils exist in situ as bedrock 75 FIGE: - BL2 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 6' 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 746-4955 ENGINEERIKGJNC. PROJECT: KING RESIDENCE. EXCAVATOR: BOBBY SIMPSON & SONS -- CTE JOB NO: 10-7060 EXCAVATION METHOD: BACK HOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/25/2004 LOGGED BY SAMPLING METHOD: BULK ELEVATION: —120' - - - - .3 c' TEST PIT LOG: TP- 1 Laboratory Tests • CL DESCRIPTION 1 / 0-1.5' TOPSOIL: SM - - _____ / Grayish brown, loose, dry, silty SAND with root hairs, very - - - - / porous, occasional iron nodules. - - - . Qt2 / 2'-5 'QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt2): SM - - . / - Red to orangish red, medium dense to dense, slightly moist - -. to moist, silty fine to medium grained SANDSTONE with occasional iron nodules (1/4 diameter). - - . Total Depth 5.0' - - . No Groundwater - - . Backfilled with Spoils -15- FIGURE:I .\C.ONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INc: 0 000TECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION S 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE C ESCOI4DIDO CA. 92029 760) /46.4955 BGNaR0G.S4C. PROJECT: KING RESIDENCE . . EXCAVATOR: BOBBY SIIVIPS.ON & SONS CTE JOB NO: 10-7060 EXCAVATION METHOD: BACK HOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/25/2004 LOGGED BY: B.S. . SAMPLING METHOD: BULK . . ELEVATION: -120' TEST PIT LOG: TP-2 Laboratory Tests U. DESCRIPTION TOPSO: A Sm Grayish brown, loose, dry silty SAND -. . . with root hairs, very porous, occasional SM - - . . iron nodules. Upper disturbed *from V 75' - Qt?. C agriculture. . WA QUA 2-5.TERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt2): Red to orangish red, medium dense to dense, slightly moist - - to moist, slity fine to medium grained SANDSTONE with - - occasional iron nodules (1/4 diameter). Total Depth 5.5' - No Groundwater. S -15 Backfiled with spoils . S. FIGUBE:I APPENDIX C LABORATORY. METHODS AND RESULTS APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS .Laboratory Testing Prop-rani Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to detect their relative engineering properties. Tests wereyerformed follOwing test methods of the American Society for Testing Materials or other accepted standards.The following presents a brief description of the various test methods used. Classification Soils were classified visually according' to the. Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classifications were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples according to ASTM D2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Exploration Logs in Appendix B. Grain-Size Analysis . . . Grain-size analyses were performed on selected representative samples according to ASTM D422. / CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. .GEOTECISNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 244 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 746-4955 40INEERfl10INC 200 WASH ANALYSIS LOCATION DEPTh PERCENT PASSING CLASSIFICATION (feet) #200 SIEVE TP-2 . 1 42.5 SM TP-2 3.5 35.5 SM U LABORATORY SUMMARY CTh JOB NO. 10-7060G NOV-23-04 04:08 PM P.02 '- City of Carlsbad -- ___________- jjn r ..ii .. i •i i CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 11MENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OJUER MITIGATION This fcrm must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate sthool districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: _______________________________ Project Address: A,P.N.: I_2J Project Applicant / -J9. (Owner Name): ,4I j? C4 L Project Description: /1JLtJ m,i V &Ct //i4 /7OtL Ii idAtEzeA Building Type: f;c /0 Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units I Square Feet of Living Area In New Dwelling - 1' Second - Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area InSDU Residential Additions: Net _Square _Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of ,9 Applicant Information -L/X~ ,ZM: Date: q / Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real ) 215 Mata Way Carlsbad CA 92009(331-5000) ....-' San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) -- --- _Contact: Nancy Dolce(Appt. Only) - Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District 101 South P.anchu Santa Fe Rc.J 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 16) Encini1a, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners, The person executing this declaration ('Owner') certiftes under penalty of pejury that (fl the iriformtion provkIrI ibove Is .orrocl and trMv to thc uel ul Lhe owneri Knowlecye, w'u ttiat tne owner Will rile an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an Increase In the number of dwelling units or Square toetage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described projeci(s), or that the person executing this declaration Is authorized to -sign "half of theQw er. 104 Siarc - Date: nn 1635 Faraday Avenue C risbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 002-i760 NOV-23-04 04:08 PM SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) d******#*#* THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities, This is to certify, that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE U ExIi '1J1 fii 05 EL CAMINO REAL S , PHONE'NUMBERS o Revised 4/20100 CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL F—I MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL Receipt No. CA4LSBAO VILLAGE ACADEMY CA LA VERA HILLS SCHOOL El PACIFIC RIM 16773 VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL Fj KELLEY SCHOOL CALA VERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL U BUENA VISTA SCHOOL HOPE SCHOOL OTHER ArAhur RECEIVED FROM: DATE: (If Applicable) PARENT OF I_'3(O KAJ1A',S FN4t5p -3t30 PAYMENTFOR: ACCOUNTNUMBER AMOUNT boo ce- c,2O _K _______ RECEIVED BT_AA}'Ak CASH ____ CHECK#D'3 TOTAL cB043379 1360 KNOWLES AV CBAD KING RES 2080 SF MFR HOME 440 SF STICK BUILT GARAGE RESDNTL SF0 ttA-.1' A) CI?, , Lot#: KING ARTHUR P C&CAROL A 7 / i - /040 / 2 f Ot JZf % 1c -27-O 71- i1 q ~qlpq SUILDtING PLANNING ii O'1 EIGINERING FIRE APPRIFO PW HEALTH OEPT HAZASAT I AIR OUM. TO FROM ____SCHOOL FORM 'I CFDFORM 1fT-Q1 [J ?I1o[thPE&MWOJdcSHET - 1 SLOG FEES COMPLETE N4 CORR 49 CORR ML CORR L-3f crce44 tQ ç0 C47 LY (1 /7 L i/-9 48 /4 A Xi S