Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1387 CYNTHIA LN; ; CB911126; Permit
R U J L D I N G PERMIT 10/01/91 12 41 " ~* Page 1 of 1 Job Address- 1387 CYNTHIA LN Str Permit Type SINGLE FAMILY DWLNG - DETACHED Parcel No. Valuation 206,770 Construction Type VN Occupancy Group- R3/M1 Description 2650 SF LIV 740 SF Class Code GAR Permit No CB911126 Project No A9000409 Development No >/ Fl: Ste /^ / S 5 4640 10/01/91 0001'01 02 C-PRMT 11223.00 Status- ISSUED Applied 08/06/91 Apr/Issue 10/01/91 Validated By KZH Appl/Ownr SEARS, TOM 3961 GLORIA LN CARLSBAD,CA 92008 720-7807 CONTRACTOR SEARS CONSTRUCTION 3961 GLORIA LN CARLSBAD, CA 92008 OWNER SEARS, TOM & WENDY •*** Fees Required *•** Lie C 346161 619-720-7807 Lie. OWNER Fees Collected ..& Credits A * Fees 1 Adjustments Total Fees 1 Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter Number of EDU Enter F M F /G M F 1,882 00 .00 ' . Total. Credits1 00 1,882.00 . Total : Payments • 659 00 Balance Due ' 11,223 00 Units Fee/Unit Ext fee Data . , 1014 659 21 's > .... ": 1 00 : 2200 and Zone( 99) > Enter "Y" to Autocalc P F F. > C F.D. Enter "Y" to Autocalc T I F > * BUILDJNG TOTAL C.F.D Enter "Y" for Plumbing Issue Fee > Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap > Each Building Sewer Gas Piping System Each Vacuum Breaker •M PLUMBING TOTAL > > > Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > , 3763 3474 390 210 11731 . 7 12 2 50 30 1 6 50 6 1 2 50 2 2 2 50 5 52 5 Single Phase Per AMP > 200 25 50 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL ($10 Minimum) Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts Each Install/Reloc Each Hood/Fireplace * MECHANICAL TOTAL > Appliance Vent > > r~~ fl CITY OF CARLSE <\fa 2075 Las Palmas Dr , Carlsbad CA 9S8I 55 « 15 1 9 00 1\ J9-" 3 .4 5 Of\ ^^^f^I^i. 3 . _1 |6 50\ /7N^ 6 JMtou ^pDAl/AP WP. fuF DATS IbAi;.../-^:-^^'^ 00 00 00 00 01 00 Y 00 00 Y 00 00 50 Y 00 50 50 00 00 00 Y 00 00 00 Y 00 50 50 U <J •nanBMM PERMIT APPLICATION *- ' City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Pa I mas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92609 (ff19) 438-1161 I PKKMIT 'ITTPh A - D Commercial LJ New Building LJ Tenant Improvement B - D Industnal D New Building D Tenant Improvement C - ^Residential D Apartment DCondo Bsingle Family Dwelling D Addition/Alteration D Duplex D Demolition D Relocation D Mobile Home D Electrical D Plumbing D Mechanical D Pool D Spa D Retaining Wall D Solar D Other 2 PROJECT INFORMATION PLAN CHECK NO. CS/-^ EST VAI. PLAN CK DEPOSIT VAIJD BY DATE __J WUU1 UJUC-PRMT 659-00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Ncardst Cross St L Building or Suite No n, LEGAL DF.SCRI ivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No ^^E-T AddAddressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS ZIP CODE 42DE@ DAY TEIJ-PHONE/Af TZD '7&7&JH ClyCQNTRACTOR Q AGENT FOR CONTRACTOR U OWNER , Q AGENT I'OR OWNER S/^*^S ADDRESS 39^ O/&yl^ **1 ZIP CODE $2DC>% DAY TELEPHONE "72,0 ~ ADDRESS ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE STATE LIC #3V£/ UbMONbK NAMh CITY STATE ADDRESS ZIP CODE LICENSE CLASS AU1JKI:.SS ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE CITY BUSINESS LIC # DAY 1ELF.PHONE STATE LIC # COMPhNJiATION Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby allirm that I have a certificate of consent to sell-insure issued by the Director ofTnaustnaT Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab C) INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO EXPIRATION DATE Certilicate ol Exemption I certily that in the performance of the work lor which this permit is issued, T shall nol employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California SIGNATURE DATE 8 OWNER-BUHDER DF.CLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration I hereby allirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law tor the following reason I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who docs such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have ihe burden of proving lhat he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale ) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]) SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act7 D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district7 D YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO IF ANY OF TIIE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOF BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS HIE APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEglTNG Tl IE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SFJWICES AND TIIE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 9 CONSTRUCTION LMN1J1NG ACiKNCY I hereby allirm that there is a construction lending agency lor the performance ot the work lor which this permit is issued (Sec 3097UJ Civil CodeJ LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10 APP1ICANT CERTIFICATION 1 ceruty lhat I have reau the application and state that the above inlormation is correct 1 agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP IIARMLESS Tl IE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST AIJ. LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WIIICII MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SATD CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF TIIE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSIIA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height Expiration Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned aLany time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code) APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE /— k - WHITE- File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK*: CB911126 DATE: 05/22/92 PERMIT#: CB911126 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2650 SF LIV 740 SF GAR ADDRESS: 1387 CYNTHIA LN CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: TOM/720-7807 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED XnN DATE s n>? BY: /JAJ^Kx INSPECTED\(/j'l^^L- APPROVED ^ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECKtf: CB911126 PERMIT#: CB911126 PROJECT NAME: 2650 SF LIV 740 SF GAR WATER DATE: 05/22/92 PERMIT TYPE: SFD ADDRESS: 1387 CYNTHIA LN CONTACT PERSON/ PHONE #: TOM/720-7807 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: , APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB911126 FOR 02/10/92 DESCRIPTION: 2650 SF LIV 740 SF GAR TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 1387 CYNTHIA LN APPLICANT: SEARS, TOM CONTRACTOR: SEARS CONSTRUCTION OWNER: SEARS, TOM & WENDY REMARKS: MH/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: STR: PHONE: 720-7807 PHONE: 619-720-78 PHONE: J INSPECTOR INSPECTOR AREA MP PLANCK* CB911126 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW FL: STE: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE CB900320 SFD SE910082 SWRSD STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 17 ST Interior Lath/Drywall ACT COMMENTS 33= ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 013192 Insulation 012992 Rough Combo 012892 Rough Combo 011592 Shear Panels/HD's 011592 Gas/Test/Repairs 011592 Rough/Topout 123191 Roof/Reroof 102491 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 102191 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 101691 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 101691 Underground/Under Floor ACT AP PA NR AP AP AP AP AP NR PA AP INSP MP MP MP MP MP MP MP MP MP MP MP COMMENTS PEND.PLANCK REV/OK TO INSUL OK TO WRAP GARAGE NO PLANS ON SITE FOOTINGS-PENDING SOILS REP DATE:1 JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 y 11 SET: D URISDICTION jriAN CHECKERQFILE COPY QUPS nDESIGNER D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified \x>lrnj are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant def iciencio-s identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: TOM I Gl L Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS; t^Ae Telephone # are By: 7>Ai/( D Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION DGA DAA DRN Q DM ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE : S" JURISDICTION: ( PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: /*/ VXRLS Q/- / 3 /?F* ! i\ BAP I/J.6 C± **7 H / <r3 f SET: -I /^ _u/ /( Vn / /? / a /.-/I, S^D KER QFILE COPY [jUPS nOESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. UJ The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. -j The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the •J jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. {Si; The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: f a Ln CB <? 20 jjfl Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. I| Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone #_ By;f)Enclosures:ESGIL CORPORATION / GGA UAA DRN QDM /niRlSDICTION- PLAN CHECK NO : 9 ( ~ U ^ 6 PROJECT ADDRESS • Date plans received by plan checker: Date plan recheck completed; ^/W By C\Jf( ~fji i £X Ln^- o TO; RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION SHEET FOREWORD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to. ( 3 ) ^ — ^ _ _ e ' To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. 0 The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews The original correction number has been given for your reference In .casa^you did ncit keap—a-copy ef—the—ppi-en?—correction list-,—we—hay.fi ene4es«d—those—pages—e©ntaifftng-the~s tti4— outstanding--correction's. Please contact me ,j_£ you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please check Yes No (3> C "ft a 0 -f \/ (eO B-cltofiv, *J1 ~ii'(>S VJ\Y->Ao^.i V T/P -f./rv./ Wihiiflk? ^rha-lflf ^~T di~ A hoii^ mppt -e^ti t*T*l, *».„+• a»<J r+ n/:V ,*t r>^,2r // /• / J \ ! 5 l-iXf> cJ of rt ->Jr,^<4/ ^.,'-t.Ul^ Form No RPCS.A1290 •€. fha Of CHIP 0U IH (fi ft, aa<? OY\.-4-hp n'~r On a ~r-7 C7 (7 K! 0 1 ft irs Q/i )'^7 //7/r , //./7 V h> <d A/olfe <^>A -L-+ fro If -nvnfl M<r "7 <J •/" .-i/? -44-, o <£."0-f w , 1 C-T / /.- T."~f J/v t.~T~ is C/ ll £*rl Vt< * -IJ.p fy/J> labs C'4-L't t~f f I /M i,.,;-? -J-}n /<!>>.&Cf p f riff~i7 •>" f t>- y* fl 1 ^ & r (T/D ~f fjry>nlir.).f(5 -A> I>-.' r / — A> //-. 4, 'skew /\/D -r d ./ ^; -Hip UP Date:Jurisdiction n Prepared by« / PLAN CHECK NO. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE ?/-// Q Bldg. Dept, D Esgil BUILDING ADDRESS APPLICANT/CONTACT BUILDING OCCUPANCY /3<P~7 n -H?t * -To M PHONE NO. -/ DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION // -/S/CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION //•M«7 PO i , 1O Pc- £/ Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA zilm 74u VALUATION MULTIPLIER @ § @ ( VALUE ^ -2^^ >^ ^ !>t Building Permit Fee $ Plan Check Fee $ COM ME NTS- SHEET / OF / 12/87 cr- °" UJaco 123 S, N R T* D D C C C H H H E E E K K K DD n op n X ]DE n BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST DATE:8 //(* fat PLANCHECK NO. 9/-J/2b ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE NEEDS YOUR ACTION ITEM SELECTED PROJECT ID: 4PNJ LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimension setbacks. 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and^ proposed slopes,driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance MS 766 4. No Discretionary approvals were required. 5. 6. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. f^lS Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. Conditions complied with by:. Field Review Date: nnn 7. nnn 8. na Field review completed. No issues raised. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found:nnn A. ana B.Site lacks adequate public improvements Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines. P \DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010 DH REV 02/27/91 '—' '—' '—' D. Grading is required to access site, create p.. provide for ultimate street improvement. '—' '—' '—' E. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsitt turnaround or engineered solution to problem. F. Other: EIC Dedication Requirements n 9. No dedication required. '—' '—' 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8V x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date By:. Improvement Requirements '—' '—' 11. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE; Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. '—''—''—'l2. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: by:. P \DOCS\MISFORHS\FRM0010 DH REV. 02/27/91 '—' '—' '—' 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By: 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). '—''—''—' 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. '—' '—' '—' 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: by: Miscellaneous Permits '— '—' '—' 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. ^ '—' '—' 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following; Co^yr^ocfio^ of Qrztv&uJA? OfPfoAt.!! P£H C/ry nan 18. Sewer Permit is not required. "-^ '—' '—' 19. Sewer Permit is required. A sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. '—' '—' 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. P \DOCS\HISFORMS\FRH0010.0H REV. 02/27/91 '—' '—' '—' 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waster Permit accepted -• Date: By: Fees Required Ed 27. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant:__J Fee per Unit; To &tffa,0 w/r// Total Fees: 23. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit; $(£>OO<a& Total Fee; 24- Bridge and Thorough fare Fee Fee Per Unit; ?i^^dh&/iC($ Total Fee: [0 25. Public Facilities Fee required. 0 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone; I Fee; El 27. Sewer Fees Permit NoJ£9<Oo6Z. EDO' s I Benefit Area; -— Fee; 28. Sewer Lateral Required; /i^&5T/<J<Ss- Fee: 2 9 . REMARKS : THE L&il&ujg*/ Q&KoAc* IS To ££• CODST(lucT60 f&Q. ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT BY: /. ^ DATE: P \DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV 02/27/91 n Plan Check No Planner APN PLANNING CHECKLIST Address Phone 43&Vl6l ext M -76.6 Type of Project and Use Zone r"" ' Facilities ManagemWf Zone Legend Item Complete [tern Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION Compliance with conditions of approval7 If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO PROJECT NO DATE OTHER RELATED CASES. Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval California Coastal Commission Permit Required- YES NO DATE OF APPROVAL. San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval 177 H o ana ana Landscape Plan Required YES _ N'O _ See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans a<sy£ Site Plan. Zoning 3 4 Provide a fully dimensioned sue plan drawn to scale Show \crr arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed srr_c:_res streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way 'Aic:r ir~ dimensioned setbacks Show on Site Plan adjacent to buil slopes and drive Provide legal descnption of property Provide assessor's parcel number or -"irLsn ng ana orc zra-e rcsec Setbacks 2 Lot coverage 3 Height. 4 Parking: Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTE DATE PLNCK.FRM W. E. GUND1& ASSOCIATES, INC. CMI EnginMilnft DMign 1177-01 CHECKED BV BATf 1? oof pUY WP ?-O ur,i £ f>r JDIJT5 *.** n^ JJL pu ^o M IP!> J—•* W. L GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM) EnotoMriflQ, DMlgn DESCRIPTION. MADE BY CHECKED BY -OATf. -OAT*. \ho jyr> to>- I-'SS x?J>' „ iMUx 20'5\i^ . 2.fi .A iH D-F. W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM) Engineering. Dtttgn DESCRIPTION. MAM BY CHECKED BY. .OAT* I.* I? 8 OF, l?tPiT7 g. p. 16/2-7^.^ )2- W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM EnotaMrina (feign oeacRipnoN. MADE BY CHECKED BY. -OATt. .OATf. J/1D o /?>»(>£(2 ,2 JD v(|0 .A " Xru- I W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Ctv» Engtaetring, Dtttgn OCKRIPDON.nn-oJ MAOCBY. CHECKED BY. DAT!. OATS. 1/32. * 11-0 FT 2.0 )>1 W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES. IMC. CM) EngtoMring. Dttfgn DESCRIPTION.\\ll-0l MAOCBY___ CHECKED BY. .OATf.1/10 T f*U W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM) EnglnMring, Onion DESCRIPTION.IIZ7-0 MADE BY CHECKED BY. DATE, DATE. I/IP 7u too/* W. t GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM) EngtoMring, Dwlon MADE BY. CHECKED BY..OATt. ifc »• x5) (PL om-y) _ ^ .,\b W. L GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. QvN Enginewlna Owlgn \\l7-oi MAM BY. CHECKED BY. _OAT«. OATT. u; ZI TO TO LEVEL FLOOR. FLAN C-7- rf i < J HI © tu 1-a. ^^S )K 4'-:SI CJ .re7 -4-•ii'- <1 rfe T N; £ 5 W. £. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES. INC. CM EnolnMring, OMlgn ocacmpnoN.\\l7-ol MAOCBY. CHECKED BY. -OATH. .OATf. 1/1 D AREA 7 TO v,. TO w^vt TO 21 -70 Jl DAT TO ^7 we" W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. QvN Enoineartng. DM** DESCRIPTION .i IZ7-P/ MAOCBV. CHECKED BY . .DATE. ,0*1*. i/TO TO \) w 0 V TO 7 TO ft. V TO v/A<-U A w. 17->' 0k., J? i W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CMI EnginMring. (MUgn ocacmpnoN. MAOC8Y..DATE. CHECKED BY .DAT* . TO 7 TO W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM EnglnMrtng. Owlgn 1 '£•/•" 1 MADE BY. CHECKFBBV OAT* TO 0 -TU £> I/IL or^f TO WHU, I W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES. INC. CM EnginMrtno. Otslgn MADE BY. CHECKED BY . .OATt. -OATf. TO fc'W 0 d TO TU \> HO * A / /t 31 670V r 17 1127-01 W. E. 6UNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM Engineering DM** MAOCBY. CHECKED BY . .OAT8. -OATt. AREA TO X" ! -. =• 7731 z/16 70 Wl^UU K v.. n 6 W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES. INC. CM EnaMMrtna DMtpn A CmtncUan (213) M7-2M1 DESCRIPTION . MAM IV CHECKED BY .CUTE. .DATE. \b V& 770 I80p/f peLP ,<. piLP rue 'kc e i ASS e it e 12 6 6 44 «. A3S C ll HP'Z HP'S" HO-5 HP-7 /TP i* W. E. GUNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. CM Enohmrtna Owlgn DESCRIPTION.1127- o \ MADE BY CHECKED BY. .DAT*. .OATT. TWO W 15" A 6- •, t 1 j I -U i l_r ri; iLU.jL.i-. t Ji i I HI N •, ICBQ Evaluation Service, Inc. A subsidiary coiiMMiiun of the Inlernationa! Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT lit (£) lO'J 1 IC8O Evalu.iuon Service, Inc ReporlNo.2319 February, 1991 Filing Category. WALL COVERING (288) WEYIRHAEUSER HAROBOARD SIDING PRODUCTS WEYERHAEUSER COMPANYposr office BOX 9 KLAMATH FALLS, OREGON 97601 I Subject Weyerhaeuser Hardboard Siding Products II Description A General TheWeyer^eu&erhardbcwdsidingisafi- brous-feited homogenous panel wade from wood fiber which is consoll dated under tieat and pressure in a not press 10 the desired density The product ic iTianufaotu/od in 7/>,0 mrh and '/, inch Ihiclrioicac and in three finishes wittiout factory applied finish, factory-applied sealer and primer, and prelimslied surface Lap and panel products are available in a variety of embossed surface patterns The surfaces ate machined to d variety of flroove patterns B. Square Edge Panel Siding* The square edge siding is manufacturedin d fcf r hy fi 7 fi q snri in fnfiMnno nancK The panels are available in both srnooih and textured surfaces These panels may be applied over walls with or without sheathing Vertical butt joints on square edge panel products must occur over the framing members and should be covered with batten strips C Shiplap1 These products are manufactured in 4 leet by 6,7 8.9 and 1 (Moot-long panels and are available in both smooth and textured sur- faces There, are several shipiaps available depending on the groove pat- tern These products may be applied over walls wild or without sheathing Vertical seams must occur over framing D Standard Lap The lap siding is manufactured in 6, 8 9'/? and 12 inch-wide boards 16 feet in length The lap siding ii available in botn smooth and textured surfaces The siding is Installed horizontally over walla that moot oolong roqutremenle If no cUsthm-g it need building f>3 per iiuisi be applied directly beneath ihe siding Each course is lapped at least 1 inch Vertical joints must occur over framing members Corro sion-resistant 8-penny box nails are used Nails must be long enough to cover both $iding courses arvJ penetrate the framing members, at least 1 inch. Nails should be 5/8 to 3/4 inch up from the drip edge, Lap products are also available with a self-aligning feature on the back of each piece 10 allow (or alignment of subsequent courses E Specially Lap, Cottage lap, channel rustic, V rustic and colonial lap siding products are nominal 16 or 24 inches wide by 16 feet long with hori- zontal shiplap lomts These products are available in a variety of groove patterns and surface textures The specialty lap products require three naiiStper lap on all studs Successive laps are nailed 5/3 to 3A, inch up fiom the drip edge and m the center of the lap Corrosion resistant 8 penny box natls.are usea vertical bull joints are to be located over the it be slaogered on successive courses Jnstdllations i 25 0 of 'he F Shear Valu?s: When Installed In accordance w.th Section 2516 (g) 6 and Table Mo 25 0 of the code, the following shear values are applicable to Weyeihaeuser shiplap panel products Panel Shear (Ib /it)' Thickness '/»" Deflection V 155 V 202 G General Application Requirements for all Siding mLjt be In accordance wi"i Section 2516 (g) 6 and T30le N code Vertical framina must not exceed 16 inches on center A minimum6-inch space must be allowed between the bottom ol the siding and the soil Siding should not be in direct contact with concrete M V8 inch gap should be provided around all openings Gaps must be caulked with an approved sealant All exterior openings must be flashed HI dccortfance with the code H Finishing The primed siding must be finish painted wilhm 90 days dliBJ IfiMdlldllun II uxpmeU (ui A luuyei (jcngij (jt lima, llic iiJing ilivulU be repnmed with Ingli quality exterior grade primer follow the paint man ufactuier's recommendations The siding must t>e clean .;nd diy when painted I 1990 Accumulative Supplement to the U B.C This report is unaf fected by trie Supplement J Identification Weyerhaeuser Company haidboard sidles are idenli lied by the American Hardboard Association logo, mill number and a nole indicating conformance to the American Hardboard Association product standard ANSI-AHAA-135 6 II! Evidence Submitted Material description, installation instructions. test reports indicating compliance with U 8 C Standard No ?5-26 Amen can Haroboard Association certification, racking test result > and descnpdon of the quality assurance program Findings IV findings Submitted, That the Weyerhaeuser Siding Products de- scribed in this report comply with the 1 983 Uniform Building Code, sub (act to the following conditions 1 All window, rinnr and other exterior openings are 'lashed ID ac cordance with the code 2. The products are manufactured at the Weyerhaeuser Company plant located at Klamath Falls, Oregon, with follow up Inspec- tions by (he American Hardboard Association (AA-614) 3 The products are manufactured, identified and Installed in ac- cordance with this report anrl inn manufacturer's Instructions. This report is subject to re-examination in two years. Values obtained on aged samples /• uluaiiun rt'piitl!, iiJICHO t' I'utiiuiittn Iff nee, Inc . itre i\\niii M/lelt in pmviitt tnfiiniiuluiii to (, la iM uitiiiher* nfl<. DO. iitllltiiiK ilie fmlf iipnn « tut h tli? r, purl !\ hti\fil I'liilniiliiin fiptirl* art iK'tt'i hi «ua\irueJa\ ft/w\c«/i«fi uflliillt ' urutiyiilticrnilritmtcv itvt \i>e(lft(ultyailiirt\\alnnra\ OH tndnf \eiui nt nr ft < mttm, n iltittnn/iir «!<• ufihe \tit>ji.cl rtpiirl /"/;« rtpiirl i* liu\<.J II/HIII independent U \t-, or ullinrlcchMtut data \i<bimt'fd by tilt flpiiUciiill riif ICIK) /;'ia/l(iJ/iu/l Sertlce, Inc Itf/nnctil \toff liit\ mtehfitllit Iciln \ulli unJtnr other Jala, hiildin.* mil p<n\r*\ le\lfarilstn.<itattiut.ciin InJrptndtul ftnfieatum Hurt i< 1111 MiirrtiiitybyK. ll<> I \ntiinnotitn rn«', lite ,etpn n tt n\ !•/ ("if ' /• iiitluif, "»/• other nuttier tn tin ft ///•/•/ »> ti\ in aii) pritiliid eurtreilty llif rtfttfi Ttu\ dhfhuuurinftitdft htiln mil limit, din nn /•< /ianlnlnlii\ o( mm. TESTERS 11421 Woodsido Avenue, Suile C S,inke, California 92071 (619) 562-0500 PO Box 1195 Lakeside, California 92040 PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION FOR Residential Building Site 1366 Knowles Avenue, 1363 & 1387 Cynthia Lane City of Carlsbad Section .TABLE OF CONTENTS Content PAGE SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE SECTION 2. FINDINGS 2.1 SITE CONDITIONS . . 2.2 SOIL CONDITIONS . . 2.21 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 2.22 FIELD EXPLORATION 2.23 SOIL TESTS . . . SECT_!QN_3. 3. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS 3.2 RESISTANCE TO LATERAL MOVEMENT . 3.3 CANTILEVERED RETAINING STRUCTURES 3.4 EXPANSIVE SOILS 3.5 SLABS-ON-GRADE 3.6 EARTHWORK SECTION 4. LIMITATIONS BORING LOGS 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 1 1 13 0 July 17, 1991 11421 WoodMde Avenue, Suite C San toe, California 92071 (619)562-0500 PO Box 1195 Lakeside, California 92040 Tom Sears, Larry Conery and Tino Medina 3961 Gloria Lane Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT Project No. 13F3-91 Flle No. 8719 REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION Residential Building Site 1366 Knowles Avenue, 1363 & 1387 Cynthia Lane City of Carlsbad Gentlemen: The attached report has been prepared to present the results of an investigation of the soil conditions at the subject site. It was undertaken to provide the information to design the grading and foundations for the proposed single family residences. In general, we found loose top soils to a depth of approximately one to two feet underlain by medium dense formational material. We recommend that the surface soils be recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction in accordance with the grading specifications in this report. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, . Smyth, Consulting Engineer, 21650 JCS/ss cc. (3) submitted Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 REPORT OF SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR Residential Building Site 1366 Knowles Avenue, 1363 & 1387 Cynthia Lane City of Carlsbad SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils investigation for the three Residential Building Sites to be located at 1366 Knowles Avenue, 1363 & 1387 Cynthia Lane, in City of Carlsbad. A brief legal description of the property is. APN Parcels 2, 3 & 4, Minor Subdivision Map 766 It is our understanding that three single family residences are planned. The residences will be either concrete slab on grade or wood floor; and of wood frame/stucco construction. At this time, no building plans are available. Anticipated loads are in the order of 2000 plf for continuous footings. This investigation was undertaken to: A. Determine the physical properties of the prevailing soils, including strength, supporting capacity, expansion, and settlement characteristics. B. Provide design information regarding grading, site preparation, and foundations. The investigation included the following elements: A. Review of available plans and maps to delineate the geometry of the property B. Inspection of the property. C. Subsurface exploration to inspect and sample the soils and strata. D. Soil tests to determine the pertinent physical properties. E. Analysis to integrate the data to apply the information to the property and conditions as we understand them at this time. Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 SECTION 2. FINDINGS 2.1 SITE CONDITIONS The property consists of three residential parcels Parcel 2, 1366 Knowles Avenue, has a frontage on Knowles Avenue, is nearly level and has a light cover of weeds. An existing flower field is located immediately to the west. Parcel 3, 1363 Cynthia Lane, is located immediately to the north of Parcel 2. This parcel has a light cover of weeds and has a northern frontage on Cynthia Lane. A flower field occurs just to the west. Parcel 4, 1387 Cynthia Lane, has a northwest access to Cynthia Lane cul-de-sac, and is bounded on the east by an existing residential lot. Parcel 1, not a part of this investigation, is located directly south of Parcel 4 and contains an existing residence. All of the above parcels are located in an existing residential neighborhood. Slope on the subject sites is nearly non-existant An elevation change of 2 feet occurs from the highest point at the northeast corner of Parcel 4, to the lowest point at the southwest corner of Parcel 2, some 350 feet away. Pertinent geometry of the property is shown on attached Plate No. 1 entitled "Test Location Sketch". Searches for underground utilities are beyond the scope of this investigation. Man-made fill was not encountered. 2.2 SOIL CONDITIONS 2.21 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The soils encountered in our explorations and on the observable surface were essentially one soil type, light brown and light red brown silty medium sands. The top soils were light brown and extend about one foot below the ground surface. These soils were dry and loose. The underlying "formational" soils are medium dense, damp to moist and light red brown. Locally the formation soils were lightly cemented. None of the soils encountered in the course of this investigation were considered to be detrimentally expansive with respect to change in volume with change i ri moisture content. According to Wilson, Kenneth (1972), the soils are part of the Lindavista Formation, (Pleistocene). (Wilson, Kenneth, 1972; Eocene and Related Geology of a portion of the San Luis Rey Quadrangle, San Deigo County California, a thesis submitted in Sears/Conery/Medina Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, University of California, Riverside). We believe the loose, native surface soils extend over the entire project and to an average depth of about 1.5 feet. Excessively loose native soils should be defined as having a field density corresponding to less than 85% compaction. As they are removed to be compacted, the bottom of the excavation should be tested to prevent over excavation. When the compaction of the soils of the bottom of the excavation exceed 85%, the bottom of the excavation should, be watered and compacted as specified to prepare to receive fill. Any of the soil that does not comply with the Recommended Specifications for acceptable fill soils should be disposed of off- site. Only recompacted soils will be considered hereinafter. We emphasize that we present the soil conditions as we found them in our explorations. The location and extent of our subsurface explorations are based on maps, drawings, experience, field inspections, and any reasonably available previous subsurface work and reports. Although it is probable that the soil conditions will be similar elsewhere on the site, we cannot guarantee the similarity. Data that we have gathered while following or exceeding current standards of care and using or exceeding state of the art methods, _1JDE>_1.Y_ that the conditions are as we describe. Verification of soil conditions including extent of any remedial measures can only be done, and must be done in the field at the time of construction. Procedures and quality control for construction involving compaction and recompaction are covered under a following section entitled 'Earthwork'. 2.22 FIELD EXPLORATION Field Exploration included three subsurface explorations made at the locations indicated on attached Plate No. 1 on June 6, 1991. These explorations consisted of trenches advanced with a backhoe. We logged and sampled the explorations at the time they were made. The logs are presented on attached Plate No. 2 through 3 and contain sample location, unified soil classification, lithology, textural description, wet color, apparent moisture and apparent soil density or consistency. 2.23 SOIL TESTS Soil tests were performed in both the field and laboratory on representative samples. Testing was in accordance with generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 methods and/or suggested procedures. A legend of the industry- common symbols, descriptions and test methods used herein as well as the test methods that should be used for quality control are tabulated on attached Plates. Test results for tests performed on undisturbed samples are presented on the exploration logs adjacent to where it is indicated that the samples were taken. The tabulation includes sampler penetration resistance, soil density, relative compaction, moisture content, degree saturation, percent passing #200 screen, internal friction, cohesion and potential expansion from field moisture. When applicable or potentially informative, these tests are also performed on recompacted samples to show remolded as well as field characteristics. All test results on disturbed or remolded samples are tabulated immediately following the boring logs. These tests on disturbed samples include the maximum density determination This was in accordance with ASTM D1557-84 and the results were used to determine the relative compaction(s) and references used throughout this report. SECI LQN_3_.__ RECOMMEND AT IONS 3^1_..FQUND AT IONS The type of foundation recommended is relatively shallow spread footings founded on competent soils. CONVENTIONAL SPREAD FOOTINGS founded a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade and having a width determined by the allowable soil bearing value as detailed hereinafter are recommended for foundation support. Footing widths should exceed 12 and 24 inches for continuous and square footings respectively due to practical considerations as well as Building Code requirements. Although there is no Geotechnical requirement for reinforcing in footings, good practice is to place 1-#4 continuously in the top and bottom of continuous footings regardless of structural requirements. Reinforcing for isolated footings are dictated by the structural requirements. ALLOWABLE FOUNDATION BEARING pressures as determined by soil shear strength for full live and dead loads may be safely assumed to be at least 3000 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased 1/3 for wind and/or seismic loading. Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 ALLOWABLE FOUNDATION BEARING PRESSURES (Q) as determined by soil shear strength are also presented by the following formula relating footing width (B), length (L), and depth (D): Q = 1.66 x (1+(B/L)/5) + 0.79 x D + 0.63 x B x (1-(B/L)/5) The bearing value (Q) has units of kips per square foot and all dimensions are in feet. Minimum and maximum bearing values that reflect minimum footing size and limits of formula accuracy, respectively are 3.08 and 15.63 ksf. The allowable bearing value contains a factor of safety of 3. It is for full live and dead 'loads and may be increased 1/3 for wind and/or seismic loading For foundations other than "at grade" or "near grade", such as basement or caisson type, additional soil testing and/or analysis may be required prior to final design. 3.2 RESISTANCE TO LATERAL MOVEMENT (PASSIVE & FRICTION) Resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by allowable soil passive pressure and/or coefficient of friction of concrete to soil. The allowable passive pressure may be assumed to be 366 psf at the surface and increasing at the rate of 323 psf per foot of depth. These pressures assume a frictionless vertical element, no surcharge and level adjacent grade. If these assumptions are incorrect, we should be contacted for values that reflect the true conditions. The values are for static conditions and may be increased 1/3 for wind and/or seismic loading. The coefficient of friction of concrete to soil may be safely assumed to be 0.46. Active pressures for the design of unrestrained, canti levered , individually supported retaining walls, capable of slight movement away from load may be considered to be equivalent to the pressures developed by a fluid with a density of 33 pcf . This value assumes a vertical, smooth wall and level, drained backfill. We should be contacted for new pressures if these assumptions are incorrect. Active pressures may be reduced to that of an equivalent fluid weighing 35 pcf if the walls are backfilled with "select backfill" as specified in the recommended grading specifications Select backfill should extend for a distance behind the wall equivalent to one half the retained height. Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 Restrained walls, incapable of movement away from load without damage such as basement walls, should be designed for the additional equivalent fluid of 26 pcf applied triangularly for cohesionless type soils and trapezoidal 1 y for cohesive type soils. 3.4 EXPANSIVE SOILS All soils penetrated during the course of our investigation were found to have a very low expansion and display very little or no expansion from existing moisture conditions Therefore no special design criteria are necessary to mitigate the effects of expansive soiIs. 3.5 SLABS-ON-GRADE (NON-EXPANSIVE CONDITIONS) Concrete slab-on-grade should be constructed to have a nominal thickness of 4" and underlain with a sand blanket of 3 inches in thickness. There is no geotechnical reason for reinforcement; however, it is good practice to provide minimum temperature reinforcement consisting of 6X6-10/10 welded wire mesh. The sand subbase (sand blanket) should have a sand equivalent exceeding 30 per ASTM D2419. All slabs should either have a conventional thickened edge or be poured monolithical1y with continuous footings at the slabs perimeter. Conventional thickened edges should be 8" thick at slab edge, uniformly tapering to 4" thick at 2' from slab edge. The thickened edges or monolithic footings should extend completely around the slab's perimeter. Construction and expansion joints should be considered slab edges. Maximum spacing of expansion joints is 50' for interior slabs and 30' for exterior slabs. 3.6 EARTHWORK Any grading contemplated or required should be accomplished in accordance with the recommendations and 'recommended grading specifications' presented hereinafter RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS for Residential Building Site 1366 Knowles Avenue, 1363 & 1387 Cynthia Lane City of Carlsbad GENERAL: Soil Testers and 'Engineer' are synonymous hereinafter and shall be employed to inspect and test earthwork in accordance with these specifications, the accepted plans, and the requirements of any jurisdictive governmental agencies They are to be allowed adequate access so that the inspections and tests may be performed. Sears/Conery/Medina Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 The Engineer shall soil conditions. be appraised of schedules and any unforeseen Substandard conditions or workmanship, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, or deviation from the lines and grades shown on the plans, etc., shall be cause for the Engineer to either stop construction until the conditions are corrected or recommend rejection of the work. Refusal to comply with these specifications or the recommendations and/or interpretations of the Engineer will be cause for the Engineer and/or his representative to immediately terminate his services. Acceptance of these specifications in their entirety and without modification and without construed meanings is acknowledge by the signatures hereon. Deviations from the recommendations of the Soil Report, from the plans, or from these Specifications must be approved in writing by the owner and the contractor and endorsed by the Engineer. SOIL TEST METHODS: Maximum Density & Opt Moisture Density of Soil In-Place Soi1 Expansion Shear Strength Gradation & Grain Size Capillary Moisture Tension Organic Content ASTM D1557-70 ASTM D1556, D2922 and D3017 UBC STANDARD 29-2 ASTM D3080-72 ASTM D1140-71 ASTM D2325-68 % Weight loss after heating for 24 hours at 300" F and after deducting soil moisture. LIMITING SOIL CONDITIONS: Minimum Compaction Expansive SoiIs Insufficient Fines Oversized Particles 90% for 'disturbed' soils. (Existing fill newly placed fill, plowed ground, etc.) 84% for natural, undisturbed soils. 95% for pavement subgrade within 2' of finish grade and pavement base course Expansion index exceeding 20 Less than 40% passing the #4 sieve. Rocks over 10" in diameter. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL: Brush, trash, debris and detrimental soils shall be cleared from the areas to receive fill. Detrimental soils shall be removed to firm competent soil. Slopes exceeding 20% should be stepped uphill with benches 10' or greater in width. Scarify area to receive fill to 6" depth and compact. 8 Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 FILL MATERIAL shall not contain insufficient fines, oversized particles, or excessive organics. On-site disposition of oversized rock or expansive soils are to be at the written direction of the Engineer. Select fill shall be as specified by the Engineer. .All fill shall be compacted and tested. SUBDRAINS shall be installed if required by and as directed by and detailed by the Engineer and shall be left operable and unobstructed. They shall consist of 3" plastic perforated pipe set in a minimum cover of 4" of filter rock in a 'vee' ditch to intercept and drain free ground from the mass fills. Perforated pipe shall be schedule 40, Poly-Vinyl-Chloride or Acrylomtrile Butadienne Styrene plastic. Rock filter material shall conform to the following gradation Sieve size: 3/4" #4 #30 #200 % Passing : 90-100 25-50 5-20 0-7 Subdrains shall be set at a minimum gradient of 0.2% to drain by gravity and shall be tested by dye flushing before acceptance. Drains found inoperable shall be excavated and replaced. CAPPING EXPANSIVE SOILS: If capping expansive soils with non- expansive soil to mitigate the expansive potential is used, the cap should be compacted, non-expansive, select soil placed for a minimum thickness 2.5' over the expansive soil and for a minimum distance of 8' beyond the exterior perimeter of the structure. Special precautions should be taken to ensure that the non expansive soil remains uncontaminated and the minimum thickness and dimensions around the structure are maintained. The expansive soils underlying the cap of non-expansive cap should be pre- saturated to a depth of 2.5' to obtain a degree saturation exceeding 90% before any construction supported by the compacted cap. The non-expansive soil comprising the cap should conform to the following: Minimum Compaction 90 % Maximum Expansion Index 30 Minimum Angle of Internal Friction 33 Deg Cohesion Intercept 100 psf UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS: Soil Testers assume no responsibility for conditions which differ from those described in the applicable current reports and documents for this property. Upon termination of the Engineer's services for any reason, his fees up to the time of termination become due and payable. If it is necessary for the Engineer to issue an unfavorable report concerning the work that he Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 has been hired to test and inspect, the Engineer shall not be held liable for any damages that might result from his 'unfavorable report'. Acknowledged by: Contractor. Date- Owner: Date:. Engineer. Date- 10 Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 SECIIQN_4_._JLIM.IT_AII_QNS 4.1 UNIFORMITY OF SOIL CONDITIONS The values presented in this report are based on our evaluation of the soil conditions exposed at each of our subsurface exploration locations as wel 1 as the assumption that the soil conditions in the remaining portions of the site can be interpolated without significant deviation in physical properties. Although the location of the subsurface excavations were selected in order to explore a representative portion of the site soils and, according to equipment accessibility to each exploration site, the values may be substantially different in unexplored areas due to unforeseeable variations in the soils occurring in the areas not investigated. Should any soil or geological condition not described within this report be encountered, the Engineer should be contacted immediately so that he may re-evaluate the conclusions presented herein. 4.2 TIME LIMITS The conclusions and findings presented in this report are valid as of the report date. Changes in the site conditions and soil conditions of the property may occur in the near future due to artificial works or natural occurrences. This may include changes which occur on adjacent property which may directly affect the property investigated. Therefore, the recommendations and design values presented in this report may become inaccurate due to alteration of the site or adjacent properties subsequent to this investigation. It is, therefore, our intent that the values in this report remain applicable for a period of not longer than one year provided the site conditions remain unaltered. After a period of one year, we should be contacted to inspect the site and review this report in order to verify the validity of the recommendations and design values presented herein. 4.3 WARRANTY Certain risks are involved with soil stability, foundations, and Engineering which should be recognized by those involved. During the course of our engineering services, we have performed in accordance with the current standard practices and procedures presently utilized by members of our profession in this region No warranty or guarantee is either expressed or implied by the professional services we have performed including the written reports of our findings. 11 Sears/Conery/Mechna Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 4 i4_ _QUTJ5IDEMR ESPQN SIBI L_ITY It is the responsibility ot the firm or person requesting our services or their representative to insure that the recommendations and design criteria presented herein are made available to the project engineer and architect so that they may be included in the job plans and specifications. In addition, it is the responsibility of the client and/or architect to provide whatever measures are required in order to make certain that the contractor and contractor employees are made aware of and comply with the applicable recommendations set forth in this report during construction. 4^5_EBOJECI_.CQNCJEPI This office should be notified of any changes in the proposed structures or site grading concept so that an addendum or modifications to this report may be provided as necessary. 12 CYM7H/A OPO6 LANE LOT UME MOT TV SCALE ar-/ LOCAT/OM OF PLATE I BY .DATE \ -' .-.- --'11421 Woodside Ave , Suite C Santee, California 92071 (619)562-0500 Sears/Conery/Medina BORING. ..LOGS Plate No 2 Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 E_X_P_L_0__R_A_T_I. Dates Logged Reported _0_N N_U_M_B_E_R_ 6-Jun-91 17-Jul-91 Depth Sample Locations Unified Classifications ! Soil Description v 0 -1 -V- -U- ___ -u- ~*~~ — -V-- SM SM Brown, dry, loose, SILTY SAND (disturbed) (Native) Red brown, moist, med dense, SILTY SAND (Native) (moderately cemented) Equipment used Backhoe Groundwater Free groundwater not encountered Refusal Not met 8 'depth SOIL TEST RESULTS ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES Sampler penetration resistance ('k/') 'Soil type Density (pcf) Pass 1*200 screen ', Compaction \ Friction (deg) ; Moisture | ,' Cohesion (psf) ; j Saturation ! IPotentia expansion vvvvvvvvv En Yd Re We Ds P200 Fi c Ex- —v- — 108 4 84% 2 8X 14% 30% 34 9 202 0 0% — 120 1 91% 9 9% 70% 25% 1 E_ X_P_L_0_R_A_T_I_0_N N_U_.M_.B_E._R_ Dates Logged 6-Jun-91 Reported 17-JU1-91 Depth Sample Locations Unified Classifications ; Soil Description v _T2 Equipment used Backhoe Groundwater Free groundwater not encountered Refusal Not met 7 5 'depth SOIL TEST RESULTS ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES Sampler penetration resistance ('k/') 'Soil type' Density (pcf) Pass 0200 screen ! Compaction | Friction (cleg) | Moisture ; 1 Cohesion (psf) | | Saturation ] IPotentia expansion v v v v v v v -V- -U- -U- -v — SM SM Brown , dry , loose , SILTY SAND (disturbed) (Native) Red brown, moist, med dense, SILTY SAND (Native) (moderately cemented) En Yd Re We Ds P200 Fr c Ex- — 107 1 — 113 3 83% 4 0%19%30% 90% 11 8% 68% 30% 39 3 422 2 0% --v- Sears/Conery/Medina Project No. 13F3-91 7/17/91 Plate No 3 E_X_P_L_0_R__A_T_I_0_N N_U_M_B_E_R_ Dates Logged 6-Jun-91 Reported 17-Jul-91 Depth Sample Locations Unified Classifications ; Soil Description v _v v Brown, dry, SM SILTY SAND _T3 Equipment used Backhoe Groundwater Free groundwater not encountered Refusal Not met 8 5 'depth SOIL TEST RESULTS ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES Sampler penetration resistance ('(</') 'Soil type Density (pcf) Pass 8200 screen ! Compaction ! Friction (deg) | Moisture ! J Cohesion (psf) ! ; Saturation | IPotentia expansion v v v v v v v 0 -v- -1 -U- -2 — -3 -8 SM loose, (Native) Red brown, damp, SILTY SAND (slightly cemented) med dense, (Native) En Yd Re We Ds P200 Fi c Ex- — 105 8 82X 39% 18X 30X — 115 8 92X 9 6X 59X 25X —v- SOIL TEST RESULTS ON REMOLDED SAMPLES Soi1 'type Classification ; Sample tested ; J General v ! Clsf SM SM Id 1 2 3 SM VTier T1@5' T284' V Color Brown Red brown Red brown descriptions v Texture SILTY SAND SILTY SAND SILTY SAND Maximum density (pcf) | Optimum Moisture ! | Specific Gravity! REMOLDED SPECIMENS > 1 Density (pcf) ', \ Compaction Friction (deg) i Moisture |Cohesion (psf) [Expansion Index Saturation v Ymx 129 0 132 0 125 9 v OMc 8 5% 7 6X 9 6% v Gs 2 65 2 65 2 66 v El 3 v Yd 117 4 120 1 114 6 v Re 91 OX 91 OX 91 OX v We 11 6X 10 7X V Ds 75 OX 75 0% 12 7X 75 OX v Fr 32 9 31 6 29 v | c | 260 272 233 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION ~~ 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to ver. tnat tne project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements \o ouiic. permits for tre orcjects shall be issued until the certification is sisnea D / : appropriate school cistrict and returned to the Citv of Carlsbad Buildi-g Deoart-ent SCHOOL DISTRICT Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) Encinitas Lnion Elementary 189 Union Street Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306) >-^> &<? ' ^—^ /^Q / Project Applicant Project Address RESIDENTIAL SQ FT of living area _ SQ FT. of covered area COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL SQ. FT. AREA Prepared By San Marco Unified 1290 West San Marcos Blvd San Marcos, CA 92024 San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) APN- - - Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of garage area Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986 (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $ CommAlndust Fee Levied: $, • - - based on based on sq. ft.@ /, sq. ft.@ SctiMl District Official Title Date AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.58 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at $.26 per square foot for commercial/industrial. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: 2 //1 AP u 6 fey SET: I A/ CHECKER COPY UPS DESIGNER D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the [jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transnitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and snould be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. |— The check list transmitted herewith is for your information, I—' The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. |—- The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the •—' jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: fO Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 1j Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has —' been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone f By:VW?:) Enclosures: ESGIL'CORPORATION Z!GA LJCM Date:Jurisdiction Prepared by: "DA-I/I fc>VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE p Bldg. Dept, P Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. 9/-M*-6 BUILDING ADDRESS 73^7 V/f/7/-/ /X) APPLICANT/CONTACT To V/ BUILDING OCCUPANCY /2 ^ •*. PHONE NO. 72-*?-7 DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (/-A/CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION APWI-( <^L, ( cl^ficp ~>Oefly k )<->// /7 ^ , \^'M PPU» t_<?^JH-' 1 lViHr/OiC7 O, fe. Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Snrinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA /P VALUATION MULTIPLIER £7^ @ @ @ VALUE A 7^ ^7^. Building Permit Fee $ Plan Check Fee $ COM ME N TS SHEET / OF / 12/87 W. E. 6UNDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering. Design DESCRIPTION . FU MADE BY. CHECKED BY. 1/2- -DATE. .DATE. WALL- G HUB *. |'T HttW JM?' ,II* no i D.F. I _ II 4£t—— HD2. 25-