The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1400 LAS FLORES DR; ; CB032626; Permit$ City of Carlsbad 1.635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 01-05-2004 . Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB032626 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR CBAD Permit Type: TI Sub Type: COMM Parcel No: 1561106500 Lot #: 0 Status: ISSUED Valuation: $64,800.00 Construction Type: NEW Applied: 09/23/2003 Occupancy Group: Reference #: Entered By: SB Project Title: NAZARENE CHURCH CHANGE 2ND FLR Plan Approved: 01/05/2004 RES TO ADMIN OFFICE & ADA UPGRADES Issued: 01/05/2004 - Inspect Area: Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: _ LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE -- LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 1400 LAS FLORES DR 1400 LAS FLORES DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 iCARLSBAD CA 92008 7 Building Permit $411.81 Meter Size Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Plan Check $267.68/s- Meter Fee Add'I Plan Check Fee " $0.00 SDCWAFee Plan Check Discount / $0.00 CFDaoff Fee Strong Motion Fee / $13.61 OFF f' r / flfl PFF (,Ft, Ftincfl-. Park Fee J LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BID #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee, Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water ConFee Red. Water Con. Fee . \ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 \ $0.00 \ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $811.20 $748.80 $76.00 / $35.00 / $43.50 I $0.00 / $755.28 $0.00 $0.00 $3,162.88 / iiiIa ' $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0'OQ )Traffic Impact' Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $000 Ile Tr TOTALK- I $0.00 t ELECTRICAL'TOTAL' $O.0O \ MECHANICALTOTAL' \ '\ $0.00 .. Mstr Drain'age'Fê \ "- '\c Sewer Fee \ $0.00 - Redev Parking'Fe \ $0.00 \Additional Fees --., \-' INC0R1R1I1 FEES 1952 Total Fees: $3,162.88 \ TotàI' - n a?tnents To Dater - $161.54 -BaIace Due':'$3,001.34 ) j' ,1 1 , - -1.\• \\./ / 3Ui1DfNG .PLANS STOIE ATTACHED 01/05/04 0002 01 02 CGP 300134 FINAL APPROVAL I Inspector: Date: Clearance: I NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any rig PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. C-3 Z'Z' EST. VAL. 00 r'444 Plan Ck. Deposit - I Validated By "73 Date c, /1? Z/6< - - - S S_ - - - S ---- -S PTINFORMATRN -..----. Address (include BI d #) Business Name (at this address) 4,d t9p Leaal Descntion t.ot No. - Subdjyision Name/Number Unit No. PhassNo. Total # of units Parcel # -110- of Work Proposed Use 41 I k.- "f occ-. - A0Ml1S1Vtio?J SQ. FT. # of Stones .. # of BftfhsUY/23f 03 00Gf B,J!1room92 __ z 2% 16154 key City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # ---•• ntractci D Owntr ent4orQwner Name Address ii rr Name ress State/Zip Telephone # L4d Z45 14. ! PRoER1YOER Name pWA jap r ;4 Zi T&ephone# (7(€o) 7z-cbS1 eA (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, Improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty.of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City . .. State/Zip Telephone # State License # . . -...........................................-•- Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the tollowing deOlarations: - 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-Insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance camer and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. . Expiration Date_____________________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars($1 00,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages are provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE____________________ ... I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's nse Lice Law for the following reason: - - I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as theirsole compensation, will d the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). lam exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: - I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES 0 NO I (have/have not) signed an applicatidn for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address! hone number/ contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address / phone number / !ontractors license number): S. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): - - -- I PROPERTY OWNER OWNER SIGNATURE. DATE -. . WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008 Page 2of2 FCR-Ptow S OWL Y - - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration for or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO lathe facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer bdundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. CbMSTRUCTTd LENDINGVAGENCY - - - A t -"- I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(l) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME . LENDER'S ADDRESS r9KZFA-PPLIiff'AN - ' - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to,building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGEMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations of 57 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from thp date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period o 180 days (Sect n 06.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Cliv of Carlsbad Ii? Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lit o'TF--i—re— PlanCheck #: 11/29/2005 Permit #: CB032626 Permit Type: TI Project Name: NAZARENE CHURCH CHANGE 2ND FLR Sub Type: COMM RES TO ADMIN OFFICE & ADA UPGRADES Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Lot: 0 Contact Person: BOB Phone: 7607290231 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA /j/) Date Inspected By: _______ 6)&D Inspected: 11 Approved: V' Disapproved: Inspected I Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 11/29/2005 Pêrmit# CB032626 Inspector Assignment: RB Title: NAZARENE CHURCH CHANGE 2ND FLR Description: RES TO ADMIN OFFICE & ADA UPGRADES Type: TI Sub Type: COMM Phone: 7607290231 Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Owner: LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Remarks: EARLY AM PLEASE Inspector: Total Time: Requested By: BOB Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs CV030438 CLOSED Z - UNPERMITTED USE OF BLDG; SCHOOL ON 2ND FLOOR PCR05104 ISSUED CHURCH OF NAZ- REV FOUNDATION; DEPTH,STRUCT DETAILS FOR ROOF & SHEE PCR05191 PENDING • LAS FLORES CHURCH-REVISED; ELECTRICAL SHEETS PER SDGE Inspection History Date Description 04/05/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 01/25/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 12/28/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 12/14/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/12/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/14/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 07/14/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 07/13/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 07/13/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 04/06/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 03/24/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall Act lnsp Comments AP RB D.W. @ SANCTUARY AP RB PA RB FRMG @ EXTERIOR STAIRS OK CO RB @ STAIR FRAMING - SEE NOTICE ATTACHED AP RB figs for extr. Stairs AP RB ALL COMPLETED AP RB AP RB BEAM PER ENG OK SEE 10/A1.3 PA RB AP PD OFFICES PA RB D.W. @ PASTORS OFFICE OK City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/14/2004 Permit# CB032626 Inspector Assignment: RB Title: NAZARENE CHURCH CHANGE 2ND FLR Description: RES TO ADMIN OFFICE & ADA UPGRADES Type: TI Sub Type: COMM Phone: 7607290231 Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: Inspector: APPLICANT LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Owner: LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Remarks: AM PLEASE Total Time: Requested By: BOB Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 56.6 14 Frame/Steel/BoltinglWelding Associated PCRs/CVs CV030438 CLOSED Z - UNPERMITI'ED USE OF BLDG; SCHOOL ON 2ND FLOOR Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 11/12/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RB ftgs for extr. Stairs 07/14/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP RB ALL COMPLETED 07/14/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP RB 07/13/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP RB BEAM PER ENG OK SEE 10/A1.3 07/13/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA RB 04/06/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PD OFFICES 03/24/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA RB D.W. @ PASTORS OFFICE OK 03/10/2004 34 Rough Electric AP RB 03/03/2004 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP RB @ 2ND FLOOR 03/03/2004 34 Rough Electric CO RB GROUND METAL BOXES 02/12/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RB ON FRONT RAMP 01/30/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA RB 2ND FLR FRM OK 01/29/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO RB 1ST FLR INSP ONLY / resti u B rd CA 'Y /s- ",-[ 30 Y' V1 ' h fr.:4 U RBAC81 I 2SNkEacifi9 SntMarco Phone: (766 Fax (760) 47'W Licen946027 -. wwwurbachroc OFING, INC. D-7 9 DOMINY + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS @ domusstudio liP .c August l5 2003 S... I-171, he I Bob 2692 Glascow Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 434-1807 Re: Las Flores Church of the Nazarine at 1400 Las Flores Drive in Carlsbad The low-pitched roof on the building is a three ply built up roof with fiberglass felt and gravel. Spec # GAFNB3G. . It is a class B roofing system completed August of 1996. The pitched roof is a dimensional fiberglass asphalt shingle to ELK Prestique II or equal. It is a class A roof system. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Thank you, Roger Urbach President IoaF per %-ACV* Ae -- - 'r -:- - : -'la uT ItPr Nrck1 Tci- 2) A-'_( ti.. qz.-_ .bc7r),4— /b.o'r - 3T I L4 ?11 IL C .' - Z 1 Ff.67-c-,&T : P'v t25 , L fr7J -r Vrk_ °ufl (i 9ki irW' 2qo#2 Air? t2c,'o siie I ~Yll I :' DEC-08-2003 NON 03:42 PM CITY 0FCRSLBD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 03 EsGil Corporation In 2'arn.ersFUp with Government for lftildinq Safety DATE: December 5, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores Dr. SET:m ci =JUR NT ) dEVIEW ER ci FILE PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of the Nazarene TI/Occupancy Change The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necess a r y a n d s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o m p l y with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the juris d i c t i o n ' s b u i l d i n g c o d e s when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked b y b u i l d i n g d e p a r t m e n t s t a f f . The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on t h e e n c l o s e d c h e c k l i s t and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Li The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans ar e b e i n g h e l d a t E s g i l Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Li The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction t o f o r w a r d t o t h e a p p l i c a n t contact person. Li The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d . Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax. #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: The architect added notes to the plans (in red ink) that m u s t a l s o b e s h o w n o n t h e I. set currently at the city. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 12/1/03 tmsmtidot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 EsGil Corporation. In Partnership with government for fBuiWing Safety DATE: November 6, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores Dr. SET: II U APPLICANT qJAi, UPtPREVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of the Nazarene TI/Occupancy Change The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. .. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Dominy & Assoc. 2150 W. Washington, SUite 303 San Diego 92110 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Troy Schalge Telephone #: (619) 692-9393 x21 Date contacted: , 1 f (by: 1-) Fax.#: -9394 MaiL.—Telephorie Fax '- In Person Li REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation OGA DMB LJEJ 0 PC 10/31/03 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-2626 November 6, 2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores Dr. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/31/03 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: November 6, 2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,- Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform. Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation 'of'any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please. briefly 'describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? , LJYes LINo .0 Carlsbad 03-2626- November 6, 2003 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The final sets of plans will be reviewed for proper signatures/seals. 3. When the character of the occupancy or use changes within a building, the building must be made to comply with current Building Code requirements for the new occupancy. Section 3405. Per city ordinance, automatic sprinklers are required for buildings having an aggregate floor area of 10,000 sq. ft. or more. The design option for this project elected to combine the two existing buildings together (to avoid an assumed property line between them). Therefore, the buildings should be sprinklered since, as a combined building, it exceeds 10,000 square feet. SINCE THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE IS LESS THAN 20' TO THE EXISTING SANCTUARY WALL, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILING ON THE PLANS TO SHOW HOW 1-HOUR CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PROVIDED THERE. 6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. Title 24. Bathroom 209 does not comply (grab bars at the water closet, fully-complying shower, etc.). WE WILL VERIFY WITH THE CITY THAT THIS ITEM HAS BEEN SIGNED OFF. MISCELLANEOUS 14. It appears that the two meeting rooms could be used for children (kindergarten through high school). As such, these rooms would be classified as A-3 occupancies (regardless of occupant load), which is prohibited on the second story. If the intent is to NOT use them for this purpose: Provide a letter from a church official, documenting whaUhe rooms will be (and won't be) used for. NOTHING HAS BEEN RECEIVED YET. EsGil Corporation In Partnership uiit,c government for Building Safety DATE: October 1, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores Dr. M NT 0 PLAN REVIEWER LI FILE SET:! PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of the Nazarene TI/Occupancy Change The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Dominy & Assoc. 2150W. Washington, Suite 303 San Diego 92110 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Troy Schalge Telephone #: (619) 692-9393 x21 Date contacted: t c ti 103 (by: Cr) Fax #:-9394 Mail —Telephone Fax..-" In Person LI REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation El GA El MB El EJ El PC 9/25/03 trnsmtl.dot 020 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 OCCUPANCY: B ITYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: OK SPRINKLERS?: No REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 9/23/03 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: October 1, 2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Office ACTUAL AREA: -2400 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: n/c OCCUPANT LOAD: -50 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/25/03 PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): " This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process,' please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, et Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1997UBC) tiforw.dot Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by, EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The final sets of plans will be reviewed for proper signatures/seals. 3. When the character of the occupancy or use changes within a building, the .building must be made to comply with current Building Code requirements for the new occupancy. Section, 3405. a) ' 'Thestructural calculations mention a live load of only 40 psf in some areas. This seems much too low. b) City ordinance requires Class A roofing (more restrictive than the UBC). The letter included with the plans indicates only a Class B roofing for the flat roof areas. c) Per city ordinance, automatic sprinklers are required for buildings having an aggregate floor area of 10,000 sq. ft. or more. The design option for this project elected to combine the two existing buildings together (to avoid an assumed property line between them). Therefore, the buildings should be sprinkleredsince, as a combined building, it exceeds 10,000 square feet. 4. Please provide a rough floor plan of the existing second floor, so that the extent of this permit can be better understood. 5. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. SEE THE EXISTING WINDOW IN OFFICE #4 BY THE CLOSET DOOR. Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. Title 24. Bathroom 209 does not comply (grab bars at the water closet, fully- complying shower, etc.). For the first flight of the stair outside of Door EX6, please re-draft the handrail so that it will project at least 23" beyond the bottom riser (below the bathroom window). 7. The width of the required level area on the side into which doors swing shall extend 24 inches past the strike edge for exterior doors and 18 inches past the strike edge for interior doors. Title 24. Show compliance at Door EX1. See also Door 207. 8. Rooms with more than 10 occupants may have one exit through one adjoining room. Section 1004.2.2. PLEASE DOCUMENT ON THE PLANS THE NEED FOR THE HORIZONTAL EXIT (FOR FUTURE REFERENCE). MISCELLANEOUS 9. Please provide complete MEP plans as needed for the proposed work. 10. Also, provide Title 24 energy documentation. 11. Please revise the Building Data on the cover sheet: The allowable areas were increase by 50%, but the table indicates "100%" for using only 2 yards (which is incorrect). 12. In addition to the 2-hour protection for the beam at assembly Fl on sheet Al. 1, please detail the required fire protection for the columns that support the beam. 13. Where on the plans are Key Notes 25 and 26 (from sheet Al .2) referenced? 14. It appears that the two meeting rooms could be used for children (kindergarten through high school). As such, these rooms would be classified as A-3 occupancies (regardless of occupant load), which is prohibited on the second story. If the intent is to NOT use them for this purpose: Clearly indicate the restrictions on the plans. Provide a letter from a church official, documenting what the rooms will be (and won't be) used for. 15. Show additional exit signs on the plans, so that occupants in Foyer 201 will know that a second exit exists through Office 205. II Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 Similarly, when occupants from the left side of the horizontal exit pass through Door 205, exit signs must be provided to direct them which way to go. It must be made very clear on the plans that Door 205 (and all doors within this complicated exit system) will always be openable. Door 205 must be revised to be a 90-minute fire-rated assembly. Due to the poor quality of blueprinting, the "shaded" area mentioned on sheet S-3 didn't show up. Please provide darker prints next time. Please clarify on sheet S-3 whether any of the floor joists have a ledger connection to the existing concrete wall. If so, please investigate the higher live load affect. 21 . Specify on the plans that special inspection is required for the epoxy at detail 9/S-4. Also, complete the attached City of Carlsbad form. To speed up the review process, note on this list (ora copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No C3 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. • Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 o CAp, Ci Carlsbad tyof Bui n9DeP e NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 03-2626 Job Address or Legal Description 1400 Las Flores Dr. Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 PECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: i2 L-AS PL.D4-S Re-. PLAN CHECK NUMBER: O2J,2-4 OWNER'S NAME: L#$ 1t4 CHLI4- cc-The.- cZA94--- I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architectlengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the speci a l inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the constructi o n project located atthedsite listed above. UBCection 106.3.5. Signed 96,4R,61 /'1 I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspectio n program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Egln..?a/A,cht.cr. Sul & $IgnaD&rs Here 'UI II G 1 1 114 rf ______ 111 G3240 Signed -, List of work requiring special inspection: E] Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection D Field WeldiAg 0 Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI 0 High Strength Bolting I1 Prestressed Concrete 1' Expansion/Epoxy Anchors O Structural Masonry 70 Sprayed-On Fireproofing O Designer Specified 0 Other Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: < IL /5 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: '/1JV Cy. c1 7 52J'/ Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to b e g i n n i n g w o r k o n t h e J o b s i t e . I Carlsbad 03-2626 October 1, 2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2626 PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver DATE: October 1, 2003 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores Dr. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) TI 2400 27.00 64,800 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 64,800 Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee vi I $402.81 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee EE1 I $261 .831 Type of Review: El Complete Review f1 Structural Only LI Other LI Repetitive Fee Repeats LI Hourly 1 1 Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $225.571 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc '-, - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE PLANCHECK NO CB-37242 BUILDING AEbRES / /tjD Lii. cf 30 rc' i9 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER — 1/JO- S EST VALUE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. DENIAL. The item you have submitted for review has been : Please se th ttached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, marked with . Make necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your or speci atio s for compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date including field modifications must be specifications to this office for review reviewed by this office to insure continued - conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. - B Date A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements::Date • By: Date: OR FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY . -. ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date A CFIMEN S -. .... *.............. . ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON .. be Application . Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ . City of Carlsbad •. . Dedication Checklist . . . . . . lniprovement Application .. . Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Improvement Checklist Phone (760) 602 2775 Future Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No Grading Submittal Checklist Lots Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation Right-of-Way Permit.Subrnittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: . . and Information Sheet ,. .. . Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 H:WORDDOCScHKLZflBuing Planthed, Cldst Form (Geneslc).doc I - Rev. 7/14100 CoO 1 (4) BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN . 2ND 3RD. - 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: ST 0 Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2: ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (5) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units.and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessors Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement, projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, <3 existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, / warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. :3- %t19' c•c ,'1 \j\J 0 -' d' - - - - -. - t4 çkPC tc R'(' . H:tW6Rb\DOCS\CHKLSfl8uIng Planthedc CIsl Form (Geneflc).doc • • Rev. 7114100 EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE ü U U 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. . . . U U U 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATIONREQUIREMENTS U U 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at. or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a. registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 u/2 fl x 11" plat map and. submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS fl U . U 6a. All, needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. . . . Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:WORD\DOcSCHKl.SflBuVd Planched, Cldst Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rev. 12126M BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2N0 3RD checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: ________________________ Date: El El El 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to' Car lsbad - Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This, agreement must be 'signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: . 6c. Enclosed'. please find your Future improvement Agreement. "agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by:. Date: Please return El El El 6d. No Public Improvements required. ,,SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective. improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for: a grading permit are found in Section 11 .06.030 Of the Municipal Code. El El El 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). El El El 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. ' Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: El ' El El 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification maybe required even if a grading permit is not required.) HWORODOCS'CMXLSTBUIdIfl9 PIoncheckidst For,,, (Generic 7-14-00).doc 4 ' . 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ( I 1ST 2ND 3RD 7d .No Grading Permit required. U U U 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS . U U fl 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-ofWay and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree' trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: U U U 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT. If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. . . Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: • U fl 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide, best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such, improvements shall'. be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. . 0 [1 • U 11 U Required fees are attached , No fees required ' WATER METER REVIEW . . U U 0 12a. Domestic (potable).Use • . Ensure that the meter proposed by the. owner/developer is not oversized.. Oversized meters are inaccurate.during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used; All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. HWORD\DOCSHKLS1BuIkfli Planthed, Mist Form (Geneilc).doc 5 Rey. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2", service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). LI 0 0 . 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation, service should look like: _J .-.. STA 1+00 Install 2" service and '- 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (wl a. right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line • •• Elevation at point of connection (POC) . • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve •. Total Sprinkler heads listed (with' gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no'HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:WOR\DOCSCHKLSflBuIWng Plandied, Ced Form (Generc).doc 6 • • Rev. 7/14100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD - service boundary,. the City intends on switching these. irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. F-1 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then They should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions,, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled, water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until . recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego . Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water. by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego. County Water Authority (SDCWA) for, a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and • . they must deal with the SDCWA for this. U 13. Additional Comments: . . . HWORDDOCS\CHXLSflBuIking Planthed, C1c1st Form (Gene).doc ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 ,..-atimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. El' Calculation based, on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: ( )'o'ç"' Ør Bldg. Permit No. 10 __________________ Prepared by:______________ Date: //2L9/ Checked by: Date: EDU,CALCULATIONS: List types an sq4uu,~, f tages for all uses. I S a# -'' TypsflJse: __ SqUnits: ED' , Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types anq square fos for all uses Type f Use- ' Sq. F ./Units: ______________ ADT's: Types of Use: Sq. FL/Units: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0<0 PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: -FEE/UNlT: X NO. UNITS: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS: _____ X FEE/ADT: YO RIDGE 'AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 • DIST. #2 DIST. #3 • • ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: * 4FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:________ ' UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: =$____________ Ii" 5. SEWER FEE • EDU's: 'i 34 X FEE/EDU =$ 25- i 5- EFlT AREA: ______ • EDU's: X FEE/EDU: • • =$ t 6. ______________ SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$_____________ 7.DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH /LOW _• - ACRES: X FEE/AC: =$_____________ J4JLk8. POTABLE WATER FEES • UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION lof2 • F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev. 7/14/00 DUs 1 /i6 I vo II ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ .*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which maybe due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2.0f2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev. 7/14/00 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB O3 o2( (' Address /1oo L I'lO( Dr. Planner Barbara Kennedy Phone (760).602- 4626 APN: I,-/ip-(g Type of Project & Use:CJMu_L Net Project Density: DU/AC 01 Zoning: ii.-_I General Plan: Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ •• j Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by : this permit:_________________________________________________ Legend: Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO K. TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES ____ NO ) TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: -'tif_(O Compliance with conditions or apprpval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:___________________________________________________ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO X CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): 'Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO; complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Lo #: Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklSt Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO Y (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21 1993.) ç Data Entry Completed? YES NO A/P/Ds, Activity' Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing, topographical lines. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: Setbacks: Front: 1J..c(Q'• Required (S 'LirF-. Shown Interior Side: Required ' Shown Street Side: Required to, (tAs gbte5).Shown Rear: . Required j' Shown. Accessory structure setbacks: • Front: Required l Shown Interior Side: Required .' Shown Street Side: Required jô f Shown • Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown 3. Lot Coverage: fldAr Required Shown P11,11 El 4. Height: 4/k Required Shown ON, 5. Parking: Spaces Required Shown 1iS Guest Spaces Required Shown [ .1WIU_AdditionaliComments ___ ___ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPInchkRevChklst Carlsbad Fire Department 032626 1635 Faraday Ave. Fire Prevention Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 11/17/2003 Reviewed by: Name: Dam my & Assoc. Address: 2150W. Washington St. Suite 303 City, State: San Diego CA 92110 Plan Checker: . Job # 032626 Job Name: Church of Nazarene Brd #: CB032626 Job Address: 1400 Las Flares Dr Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements.' E Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans, and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. E Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance With the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review 1st _________ 2nd ' 3rd _________ Other Agency ID FD Job # 032626 FD File # Carlsbad Fire Department 032626 ((1635 Faraday Ave. Fire Prevention Carlsbad; CA 92008 (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 10/01/2003 Reviewed by: Name: Dominy & Assoc. Address: 2150W. Washington St. 'Suite 303 S City, State: San DiegoCA92110 Plan Checker: Job # 032626 Job Name: Church of Nazarene .. BIdg#: CB032626 Job Address: 1400 Las Flores Dr Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. El Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditiOns. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions'in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review 1st __________ 2nd _________ 3rd Other Agency ID FD Job # 032626 ED File Requirements Category: Building Plan Requirement: Pending 05.11 Knox Box Knox Box required when access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life saving or fire-fighting purposes. The Fire Department will determine the location for the key box and provide an authorized order form. DpartmentEIre:revention.760-602-4666--. . Requirement: Pending 05.18 Fire Extinguishers Requi'red Provide one 2A10BC fire extinguisher for each 6000 square feet or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. Provide notes on the plans that the extinguisher will be provided. SEcomerF201 Requirement: Pending 05.25 Exit Signs Section 1013.1 Where Required. When two or more exits from a story are required by Section 1013.4, exit signs shall be installed at stair enclosure doors, horizontal exits and other required exits from the story. When two or more exits are required from a room or area, exit signs shall be installed at the required exits from the room or area and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. - EXCEPTIONS: 1. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved by the building official. Group R, Division 3, and individual units of Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. Exits from rooms or areas with an occupant load of less than 50 when located within a Group I, Division 1. 1, 1.2 or occupancy or Group E, Division 3 Day-Care occupancy. Illumination: Signs shall be internally.or externally illuminated by two electric lamps or shall be of an approved self-luminous type. Power Supply: Current supply to one of the lamps for exit signs shall be provided by the premises wiring system. Power to the other lamp shall be from storage batteries or an on-site generator. set. 2—above-door-20613-in-Room72i 067n Requirement: Pending 05.26 Exit Illumination Exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied with light having intensity of not less than 1 .footcandle at floor level. The power supply for exit illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' wiring system. In the event of its failure illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system of Group I, Division 1 Occupancies and for.all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. tEXIT that tftose EXIT signsidentified be combination C- - -. .. . . Page 1 . 10/01/03 Dccu ant load for Las Flores Church of the Nazarene Thij From: Pat Kelley To: troy.schalge Date: 4/28/04 7:40AM Subject: Occupant load for Las Flores Church of the Nazarene Troy - The Fire Marshal and I discussed the proposal faxed to the City on 4-10-04. Loose chairs cannot be counted to establish the occupant load of the Sanctuary and it appears you are selecting the correct occupant load factors for the Chancel and Sanctuary (15 sf and 7 sf per person respectively). We did not have access to scaled or dimensioned drawings to re-check the math, and assuming your's is correct, it may be that this expanded building is an A 2.1 occupancy if the total occupant load exceeds 299. The City does not set occupant loads by placing signs to limit the maximum occupant load - in this type of use, the occupancy group truly should be based on the size of the proposed assembly area and not by setting an arbitrary load for the sake of expediency or limiting costs. Patrick Kelley Building and Code Enforcement Manager 1635 Faraday Dr Carlsbad CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2716 FAX (760) 602-8560 Email - pkell@ci.carlsbad.ca.us CC: Karyn Vaudreuil 4'.I&/2O$ 1127 FA 81 2 l4 D01 & ASSOCIATES 49001/002 Diay+Aisoiia c ec de-at'idio LIP Fax Transmittal .10:- CiLy of Carlsbad DATE 4/1612004 Aun t'ai Xalie'y. p.ocr: Las io-res Cic+ of X4UM&: 760.602.8560 Naz3ICC r Seaung PMIECT PO PACES twcwaING covtp 2 'tr -Troy 0. -Sc'ige {et. 2) coni ps ou are prohabv aware 01, Las Flores c'hurch ot the Naaiene just recently receivedapproval of their CD'?. .Ps -Ave are preparing the colistniction documents for plan check, we are tTyng to review the number of pc-opie wiiiir the Snen-iary. !tachcd -is -a -proposed sea-ring plar..4Tor the -expanded anctuary, showing .200-cIa •(with .3.atsla.$) and approximately 37 people at the (hancel. This totals 237 people., which fails weil.helrnv the 300 requirement changing, from an P3 to A2.1 Occupancy. Our problem is that liwe calculate the tic upant hiad based upon area (for non-fixed seaiiitgdu to dtaiis:r, wc -WGUIc-1 -havcc 289-peopk in the Nave, with 37 at the Ch eei,-bringingt-he uaal to 326. This wcuid change the occupancy classification to an 'U. I ooemng up a path of issues that, we do not wanE to go down for an existing building. The Church u.sas this sjscc for worship (using chairs)., dining (using chairs and tables), or for various cciere-tict and - ccrings usuig -cl-iairs arid/or -tables) - Wi-il the 237 be epahk for.our -Oea'e j.aist-a .sig-u in the hack stating that the. room capacity shall not exceed 299 people? We are concerned about safct'., but can't. see how we could lit anymore people within this space, eveti if we add-ed 51, more chairs, than wh-tit is -Sii0wji on the attached plan. Yuu -help -o;i-tltts mat-un s -tcadv -atpm.ccmatcd. Pkase -d-ont heii -mc. t umil -if ',-n.m -ha;'c aw Thanks Troy D. chaige. ominy + Associales Architects dorno dio Üi 2150 West Wasbmn*bn, Suite 303, San Oeao, Cotmki½ 9210 Tel 619.6929393 Fax .519.692.9394 dc-rnusstodom r • p . L_, En_r• - !. - •••-••-. i - '--r -r .---- - - - ---L ----- --r'r J_2- -'---'--j -r- \•,-'-• '-Z -,-•_'-'.--ni - ,- -,-'--- -c .•__-'--t_ '-.'- -:ic'T4 4-1B/2004 11,127 FAX 819 692 9394 / DOM1Y & ASSOCIATES jOO2/O2 P=- I To: Fire Marshal . From: Pat . Date: April 19, 2004 Re: Occupancy Group Request Karen - I just got this today, so no hurry reviewing. We should look this over carefully before rendering an opinion. I have never counted folding chairs to establish occupancy grouping - especially when it's a multi-purpose church room. But maybe we could figure out what the occupant load is for the entire building.. It's .a plan w/o dimensions, which might complicate things a little. Maybe Brenda can book an appointment time when we're both available. I do want to discuss interdepartmental processing of code violations as well. This has to do with how to handle things like the Village Pie Shop or any other routine inspection, which turns up an alleged. code violation or other entitlement (land use permit) problem. Discussing both items might take a couple hours total at most. Pat t UJ UA4Lj LuLc 1 JLLW ZL. .L. Ow ook L$JJJL)*J L Jctajj . 4 •: 0 Page 1 Pat Kelley - ReFW Las Flores Church and Redeemer _ge From: Pat Kelley To: troy.schalge Date: 11/20/03 1:59PM Subject: Re: FW: Las Flores Church and Redeemer Troy - If it comes down to minor mark-ups on the last set of plans from plan check, a minor note can be added at the counter as long as that note gets attention at that time (the count& tech should initital the note as Ok). If you wish, a single, corrected sheet can be slipped in as well. My recollection of that "inside the stud bay" discussion was that in lieu of removing siding to install rock, plaster would be applied to the exterior. Refresh my memory on the situation please. Manufacture's catagorization of the selected range as "residential" is fine w the City as long as there is the required clearances arouind the appliance (mfg's recommended clearances apply). Pat >>> "troy.schalge" <troy.schalge@domusstudio.com> 11/19/03 11:14AM >>> Below is the item for Las Flores Church of the Nazarene. The issue is "Can I make the correction of removing the existing Sanctuary gyp. and adding 5/8" gyp on the submitted sheets, or do I need to resubmit the whole set?" I know in the past I have been able to mark directly on the submitted sheets, but would like clarification. As an alternate, I know you had mentioned that we could infill between the studs-the 5/8" gyp. for the Administration Building - is this still a viable solution for the Sanctuary to meet the 1 hr wall construction due to the assumed property line? The other item is for Redeemer by the Sea: what constitutes a residential range? The church is looking at a range at Pacific Sales. Does a 6 burner dual fuel constitute a commercial range - I know I've seen them in houses (in fact I was going to add a dual fuel to my house but too much $$$), but how does the City look at such an item? Verbally, the manufacturer stated this morning that they classify the range as residential. Per your comments during plan check, the church is to "use a residential range with a residential hood. Food preparation will occur infrequently and will not occur on a continuing, commercial basis. Therefore, a Type II hood is not required." Apparently the church has found a great deal on a discontinued model, but before they purchase it, they need to know if the City will classify it as residential. Thanks for your help. Troy D. Schalge Dominy + Associates Architects @ domusstudio LLP 2150 West Washington, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110 Tel 619.692.9393 x21 Fax 619.692.9394 troy.schalqedomusstudio.com -----Original Message----- From: troy.schalge Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:38 AM To: 'Pat Kelley' Pat Kelley - Re: FW: Las Flores Church and Redeemer Cc: 'KCulver(äesqil .com'; 'pastordwaynelasfloreschurch .com' Subject: RE: Las Flores Church Pat- Thanks for the clarification on item #1. As for item #2, I'll let the client know (I was hoping there was a solution to make everyone happy). For item #2, will we need to resubmit these plans, or can we have EsGil send the plans back to the City where we can add the note to the drawings? (we might be able to find old drawings that state 5/8" type 'x' gyp. bd. was used, thereby requiring no change to the Sanctuary). I'll be in Carlsbad Friday morning, so I can make the change to the drawings (if required). Thanks again Troy D. Schalge Dominy + Associates Architects @ domusstudio LLP 2150 West Washington, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110 Tel 619.692.9393 x21 Fax 619.692.9394 troy.schalqedomusstudio.com Original Message----- From: Pat Kelley [mailto:Pkellci.carlsbad.ca.us1 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:22 AM To: troy. schalqedomusstudio.com Cc: Pat Kelley Subject: Re: Las Flores Church Hello Troy - The restroom number 209 need not comply with accessibility requirements if there is one compliant restroom (unisex) on that level. The property line walls should be designed and adjusted to comply with property line wall requirements (notwithstanding cost) unless the buildings are analyzed as one structure and sprinklered. This may mean adding or replacing non-rated rock with rated rock on interior walls. Pat >>> "troy.schalge" <troy.schalciecdomusstudio.com> 11/06/03 10:02AM >>> Hi Pat- Hope all is going better for you. I know the last time we talked, you had a lot on your mind, including the fires. We just received the 2nd round of plan check corrections, and there are two items that need your input: First, Curt Culver will need to receive some documentation that Bathroom 209 is a hardship case and will not need to comply with Title 24. Per our conversation, since room Restroom 203 was going to be made accessible and no changes are occurring to bathroom 209, we were not going to bring Restroom 209 up to code. Secondly, there is a concern regarding proximity of the existing Sanctuary to the existing Administration Building. As you might remember, we tried initially to combine the two buildings into one building for Building Allowable Areas, but the City Municipal Code required sprinklers (over 10,000 sf). Costing too much, we decided to place an assume property line between the two buildings. As a result, we are adding 7/8" stucco over the Administration Buildings siding and adding an additional layer of 5/8" gyp. bd. to the interior. Here lies the problem: The sanctuary is 14'-6" away from the assumed property line. It has an exterior stucco wall and an interior gyp. bd. wall (thickness and type unknown). According to code, this will need to be 1 hour construction, but openings are not required to be protected. I'm asking that the existing Sanctuary wall is sufficient for this correction. Otherwise, the gyp. bd. inside of the Sanctuary will need to be removed and replaced with new 5/8" type. 'x' gyp. - more $$. Thanks for your help - I appreciate your patience and input. Please call if you would like to discuss the second item. Troy D. Schalge Dpminy + Associates Architects @ domusstudio LLP 2150 West Washington, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110 Tel 619.692.9393 x21 Fax 619.692.9394 troy.schalqedomusstudio.com <mailto:troy.schalqedomusstudio.com> 5 Pat IIE:iizIiIII: IiL1iIx15IT:5::i:IIII,ITTIgjII] From: Pat Kelley To: troy.schalge Date: 11/12/03 7:22AM Subject: Re: Las Flores Church Hello Troy - The restroom number 209 need not comply with accessibility requirements if there is one compliant restroom (unisex) on that level. The property line walls should be designed and adjusted to comply with property line wall requirements (notwithstanding cost) unless the buildings are analyzed as one structure and sprinklered. This may mean adding or replacing non-rated rock with rated rock on interior walls. Pat >>> "troy.schalge" <troy.schalge@domusstudio.com> 11/06/03 10:02AM >>> Hi Pat= Hope all is going better for you. I know the last time we talked, you had a lot on your mind, including the fires. We just received the 2nd round of plan check corrections, and there are two items that need your input: First, Curt Culver will need to receive some documentation that Bathroom 209 is a hardship case and will not need to comply with Title 24. Per our conversation, since room Restroom 203 was going to be made accessible and no changes are occurring to bathroom 209, we were not going to bring Restroom 209 up to code. Secondly, there is a concern regarding proximity of the existing Sanctuary to the existing Administration Building. As you might remember, we tried initially to combine the two buildings into one building for Building Allowable Areas, but the City Municipal Code required sprinklers (over 10,000 sf). Costing too much, we decided to place an assume property line between the two buildings. As a result, we are adding 7/8' stucco over the Administration Buildings siding and adding an additional layer of 5/8" gyp. bd. to the interior. Here lies the problem: The sanctuary is 14'-6" away from the assumed property line. It has an exterior stucco wall and an interior gyp. bd. wall (thickness and type unknown). According to code, this will need to be 1 hour construction, but openings are not required to be protected. I'm asking that the existing Sanctuary wall is sufficient for this correction. Otherwise, the gyp. bd. inside of the Sanctuary will need to be removed and replaced with new 5/8" type. 'x' gyp. - more $$. Thanks for your help - I appreciate your patience and input. Please call if you would like to discuss the second item. 1 Troy D. Schalge Dominy + Associates Architects @ domusstudio LLP 2150 West Washington, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110 Tel 619.692.9393 x21 Fax 619.692.9394 troy. schalqedomusstudio.com <mailto:troy.schalqe(domusstudio.com> Pat Kelley RE: ff6oT j hangt IT g1 From: "troy.schalge" <troy.schalgedomusstudio.com> To: 'Pat Kelley' <Pkell@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 10/10/03 11:42AM Subject: RE: Roof @ Occupancy Change Thanks! You do the same! Troy D. Schalge Dominy + Associates Architects @ domusstudio LLP 2150 West Washington, Suite 303 San Diego, California 92110 Tel 619.692.9393 x21 Fax 619.692.9394 troy.schalgedomusstudio.com Original Message----- From: Pat Kelley [mailto:Pkell@ci.carlsbad.ca.us] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:13 AM To: troy.schalgedomusstUdio.com; KCulveresgil.com Subject: Roof @ Occupancy Change Troy - Re: your inquiry. I do not object to leaving the existing Class B roof as-is for this change of use. Any new roofing or - re-roofing must be consistent with the Carlsbad mods to the UBC - ie: no combustible roofing and Class A mm. Have a great weekend. Pat </c? zm -pA-.rME4T -- ci tA (AUiZ#I 7//i NMJ' Ii acE Live 1-'AD 5O P51= 2 f!t PAitrsio L.4 M Ti 4 , M U5t j i 2. 97 A730v *s,zooiU - T*4 PA-( 2-7,c N P tJ41 /-rr, /u 5-C 1.I ok' ' roM r g -4 s 44A-5 (IL7) cIV iMQC t7 k1ZA1 oaps Mei () Sif Z > Pt2 ZTo(r rr rr -3240 * AOI J -4 1\1Q £.,z -#-rM4 160,4C. WAtL LAJ ::c&) CT) N oe z Ph-S,goj,j 0 14 P-iA,ecE$ ckura-' 'F i I -rn's r'io7-i ,4iw NIA) cwty c! 11—IO(L 2 O SEISMIC t4'VOLV 9u-&-r /JLA/ 0 CC.L/(4?SJ Ci (4ji sj f31 t,~o h i t ft5 & T o pps1trTI ot 4 Lv'f Lci, 4$e, H Lo; C4- i srTl.t44 4!-r4 IAA 4 -re, e )/IV P#11Z-711 A) 4 ttv 6 LA)I\- Ptoo'2 1..4PXI'/?JC "i- I (!; ft 4 2 AIt T, 704 c7U1f 1o Apt f9fttri 7:10 l.J Q 7R/~ i°cr, P1 p: j V Nur d4—PYA c,ypt Ct \II Q 7tA4 43I : t — --7-° /-s cij1 ía frp 91'1iThY. 91.' 4 ç3itt/r.o( prnl ',-/d 13 413 78 6 f2 674(1.r/'2-33 • M - 783 ' b16 fr 4Lr < 2 1-0 01' L- Lit' 4v1 (Ft±c))( Ise 4)4i 4-6 3. 17;T kk 000 S-' Ar (it , /J4.00M9 #Otoo '2 — > Sç- cxii: c) at- tt- •11 t 7 7L. - (t3lOk5) Ttr 4 c -> v4, 21 41 A •/t:j 4 1'<9z !' L-• -ro rrt J•" tL 9F 4*3 w/ f2.'NAJ FcA #frj&.43')'J" PsF >' ;4 e NJ ,$-rMit Lp -- Vc' Ci 0L_ LL IAJ ¶ 7 .1 'To cu-rr',4 4 4Zk'l- J Ct'Zc4 P 33> )- -14% vl- - 6,P 57eA Wk'— J 74" e#J 1 c-ri-t IA- -1• / -4- 7 'sISsioO''S 0 JA- D$ tAi-1J 4 Fj 7,o O7- (o b -/? i tvi U 0OO7As OOIX18xkX 1JJ, 0th <O2.- /- oi& ko C44t '1 t::4w4/ rr k- I.MIJW Mt 6 r7 dilot-i (T 1 #1 ((+•oi.)?7.s-=' > q /4 83 ' 2/~. 3c i?1 ((_ 1+o)x Jv 1rM !l1& O 7 o ,1J 2,4'12- e c pL I3+io 3o A~ 97/ LL So '/7.4 F A-X 14 L :191' fri-ft a-tr m) 17.3 L-L 4, >x,-1,rn /L01' ¶ ¶r4 # ,• I • •••• M - 7.83\ • 4183'1/t 82 M- •. • •_I • ('w? x4* 9e4' r &1AX 1°e1- o kki- GOA •. • I~-• •••• • •b- • •• 4T .""' •$1- :. •• I • ____________ •• • • • • ( • • '0 • g;A A5 or bM -c 41 C4i.o - tV • • If; 3 VIV 3 -744 I ° 786 ¶_* 4?JpC'4.;) — _\Th_f • %oo• p .3 , -r-- --t.e - S b kA7k1L 'I (p1½ 442'. eE;1'c .5Tu P 33> ?- 6- - u4. 141J V-Ar ---tç'• I, e t, CA344 7. fr4 + rc I6 t/% r'Tr X- I 00 a fsr- - I Or >7 -b ?3tAi-I,J W/71 ( Ooo,'ti 00 x <Ot /-- 2T*.g 5e k-. 11-A 6 A, ~91 t4cc r22