The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1400 LAS FLORES DR; ; CB043753; Permit0Lt 'ç)rJ[ City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 02-14-2005 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: 0B043753 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: Applicant: TROY SCHALGE 1400 LAS FLORES DR CBAD TI Sub Type: COMM 1561106500 Lot #: 0 Status: ISSUED $227,760.00 Construction Type: NEW Applied: 10/01/2004 Reference #: Entered By: SB LAS FLORES CHURCH 2600 SFADD Plan Approved: 02/14/2005 1280 SF REMODEL Issued: 02/14/2005 Inspect Area: Plan Check#: Owner: LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE SUITE 303 215OW WASHINGTON ST 92110 619-692-9393 EXT 21 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size AddI Pot. Water Con. Fee Red. Water Con. Fee 1400 LAS FLORES DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 $940.80 Meter Size $0.00 Add] Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 $611.52 Meter Fee $0.00 $0.00 ' SDCWA Fee . $0.00 $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 $47.83 PFF / / I $0.00 $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 License Tax - $0.00 . $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee . $639.60 " $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund),' $590.40 $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL-, = . $69.00 $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL .' $35.00 $0.00. MECHANICAL TOTAL / $55.00 $0.00 Master Drainage Fe' $0.00 Sewer Fee $1,232.91 $0.00 Redev Parking Fee $0.00 $0.00 . Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES - $4,222.06 Total Fees: $4,222.06 Total Payments To Date: $600.00 Balance Due: $3,622.06 BUILDING PLA IN STORAGE ATTACHED 1781 02/14/05 0002 01 02 541oeP . CGP 3622.06 FINALtAP ROV Inspector: -.----' Date: _____________ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as"fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any tees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. oo i r1' 'rA FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1% PLAN CHECK ____ PERMI APPLICATION pia o 7 - CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Validated By__________________ 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad CA 92008 Date / PRCJECTINFORMP,flON * 1 U (include me (at this adtAS 't oo Le al Description No. Unitblo. - .EhaseNo. - Total #ofi IiW4? (Acv_CI1iw_ # of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms re II ppijp.t) ..- 7jq o,2-71 Of - Telepho___F FnI '1 ______________ c 0 U.'.i JL1 f c r -CA ZO 1 Name DWI AJpcj?J7 _____.Sl.-r Jb(17)_ j c9TcT ANy/NNiE.. / (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any struaure, prior to itsissuance, / also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the' basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by. En applicant for a pernli ubjects the applicant to a civil pena)!y of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). . . I _' _Lcir23(31 _LfAccpA ii/Li '___c4__72o q'3o17 Name Address . City State/Zip . Tel phone # State License # 7.)_27 _ . . License Class City Business License.#'eA Designer Name .. Address . ' City. State/Zip. . Telephone # State License # . . . . . . . . VVORkERç9ENSA11ON Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of pequryone of the following declarations: -,. .. . . . . . I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to ,self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by.Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3.700 of the labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: tj J Insurance Company ~1?7' _frp)_0 PolicyNo. I4tO ) Expiration Date _'2 1f_I/b S Y' (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMP N: I ce ' that in Jpe performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shalt not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject'to the orke C2apensa , n iforn,ia. . WARNING: Failure to ec 7.1 rkers' nsat overage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars($100 000) in com ation damages are :r0v1ded for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code interest and fes,, <... SIGNATURE- DATE I hereby affirm ?thaam exemptfromthe Contractor's License Law br the tollowing reason o I as owof the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation w will d the ork and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and essions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered, for sate. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Láw'does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). . . . . .. . - I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES 0 NO I (have/have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license 'number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address I phone number / /ontractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hiked) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Existjq Use I5,-I1O Description of Work APPLICANT ( mtraLr Nar AIIr I 4. PROPERTY iER OOUBU!d )INId 1Ue0!Idd' :MO11RA eI!J :RIIHM 1 /31 31Y (apo 6u!plln9 WJOJ!Ufl VPr u~jojj~sAep P 08 poued e io paouowwoo S! )0M eq J5145 ewi Aus le pauopusqe jo papuadshs s l!wIed tpns iq pezuoqlne )3J0M Jo 6uipinq eqj 1! Jo jiwiad qons jo oe Q9 u!lfl!M paouawwoo lou ! l!wiad qons Aq pazuoqine )J0M Jo 6uipinq oql it P!OA pue 11nu ewooeq pus uoqeliwil Aq eJ!dxe mleqSepoO S!41 Jo suotsicoid aql japun jeio!4O 6uipInq eqj Aq pansSi l!wJad AJ8AR :NOIjyIdX3 -jq61aq UI 5UOJ5 C JaA0 sainjonJs Jo uoipruJsuoo io uoqiowap pus deep a s Jo SUOI1eAeOXa JOJ paJiflbeJ Si Jiwiad VkSO uy YHSO 1IW34 SIHI O ONIINY8O RH! -AO 33N3fl3SNO3 NI A1I3 aivs ISNIVOY 3flH33Y AVM ANY NI AYV H3IHM S3SN3dX3 ONY S!S03 S!N3IN39Ofl SRI!I1I9YI1 TIY !SNIY9Y OY8S1IY6 dO AJJO RH! SSR1IYH d33)4 ONY AdINW3NI RAYS 01 39IDY OS1V I sasodind uoqoadsui ioj Avadoid pauoiluew eoqe aqj uodn JeUe 01 peqspe Jo .1'0 oql JO seAlleluesajdai ezuoqine Aqajaq I UOqOflJlSuO3 6upinq 01 6u!WIaJ SMel 01515 pue SeoUeu!pJO .13 lie q1M Aldwoo 01 eai6e I -0l8Jfl3O ! sueld aql uo uoflewioju! OUI leql pue pauoo s! uonswjoju! aaoqe aLli ieqi alels pus uo!leo!Idde aqi peai aAeq I 18111 AJJ.VaO I ______ - N0I!Y3IdU.JR3 [NYOliddY 6 SS2I00V S2ON31 3VIIVN sRaN31 (apo m!A!3 (I)L60E -oa) PeflS5! s llwjed s!ql qo!qM JOJ MJOM 811110 aouewiojJad atil ioj A3ua6e 6u!pual uo!pnJ1suoo e Si ejet4j ieqi WJIJ4S Aqaiaq I - ii !3IJSIa 1OJ.NO3 NOI!flhiOd-IY RH! ONY S33IA3S A3N39RV3 dO 331dd03H1 dO S!NRWRIflORd RH! ONI.LRRIN SI SO IRIN SYH !NY3I1ddY 3H!-SS3iNfl a3flSSI38 ION AWl A3NYdfl33O AO 31Y3IdITh33 lYNIdY 'SRA RIY SRMSNY RH! AO ANY dl ON 0 SRA o 01P 10043S a 1 A.iepunoq Jalno 0J Jo l0J 000 L u!ql!m pa3nisuoo eq 01 AJIII3eJ eqj si ON 0 531 0 13U1SIP luawa6euew Alllenb ite io JOUISIP IoJ1uo0 uoilnhiod JIB 81 woji jiwiad S uieqo OJ paiinbaJ luedn300 6uipiinq einnj Jo lueolidde 0111 SI ON 0 931 o .1°V jun033y aouesqn snopjeze ieuue Aelseid eqi jo t'sssz io £ESSZ soss suolpeg jepun wei6oid UoijueAaid pue 1uawe6euew Isp jo ioj uoileilS!6aJ sieeew. snopiezeim Aiainoe ueid ssau!snq e liwqns 01 pei!nbei iuedn000 6u!pimnq einlfli io ueoqdde 8111 Si zj0zabed 90O6 VO peqsie 'OAV IPwed 99 I 1N3VJ1lVd3a ON101109 aysiivo dO AIIO N0I031 IddV 1IINI3d City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Ei're Plan Check #: Date: 10/13/2005 Permit #: CB043753 Permit Type: TI Project Name:, LAS FLORES CHURCH 2600 SFADD Sub Type: COMM 1280 SF REMODEL Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Lot: 0 Contact Person: NICK Phone: 9493741519 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA ' Inspected Date By:-_ 2 / Inspected: Approved: ,K Disapproved: Inspected / I Date By: •Inspected. Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date, By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/05/2006 Permit# CB043753 Inspector Assignment: PC Title: LAS FLORES CHURCH 2600 SFADD Description: 1280 SF REMODEL Type: TI Sub Type: COMM Phone: 9493741519 Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT TROY SCHALGE Owner: LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Remarks: Total Time: Inspector: Requested By: NICK Entered By: JANEAN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical X 0— omment Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs CV030438 CLOSED Z - UNPERMITTED USE OF BLDG; SCHOOL ON 2ND FLOOR PCR05104 ISSUED CHURCH OF NAZ- REV FOUNDATION; DEPTH,STRUCT DETAILS FOR ROOF & SHEE PCRO5191 ISSUED LAS FLORES CHURCH-REVISED; ELECTRICAL SHEETS PER SDGE Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 10/14/2005 89 Final Combo PA PC FIRE IS SIGNED OFF OK TO OOCUPY PROVIDE PLAN REV OF ELECT SVC PROVIDE CONTRASTING COLOR ON STOPS. 10/13/2005 89 Final Combo CA PD revision is pending 10/05/2005 29 Final Plumbing AP PC 10/05/2005 39 Final Electrical PA PC EMIR 09/22/2005 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring PA PY CONDUIT ONLY * SERVICE GROUND 09/13/2005 84 Rough Combo AP PC ABOVE CEILING 08/22/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PC 08/17/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 08/16/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PC PER NICK 08/12/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA PC EAST 1/2 AND 2ND LAYER F.W. UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE:(O(N(05.. PERMIT #(7O75 3 JOB ADDRESS I OQ INSPECTOR PLAN CHECK #__________ DESCRIPTION (TVr4T CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 6 f 5 5(QNW OFF (1) or-, Tz)- Ocrulo~ pfrsflj C4tio czU 731 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/05/2005 Permit# CB043753 Title: LAS FLORES CHURCH 2600 SFADD Description: 1280 SF REMODEL Type: TI Sub Type: COMM Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT TROY SCHALGE Owner: LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Remarks: Total Time: Inspector Assignment: PC Phone: 9493741519 Inspector: fE:iiI Requested By: NICK Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical Act Comment Al9 EVi1 t- 2Li7 Associated PCRs/CVs CV030438 CLOSED Z - UNPERMIUED USE OF BLDG; SCHOOL ON 2ND FLOOR PCR05104 ISSUED CHURCH OF NAZ- REV FOUNDATION; DEPTH,STRUCT DETAILS FOR ROOF & SHEE Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 09/22/2005 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring PA PY CONDUIT ONLY * SERVICE GROUND 09/13/2005 84 Rough Combo AP PC ABOVE CEILING 08/22/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PC 08/17/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 08/16/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PC PER NICK 08/12/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA PC EAST 1/2 AND 2ND LAYER F.W. 08/11/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA PC 1ST LAYER 08/08/2005 16 Insulation AP PC 08/01/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PC WALLS & HARD LID AREA 08/01/2005 34 Rough Electric PA PC 08/01/2005 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers PA PC HARD LID AREAS. 07/26/2005 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PC 07/26/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC PC 07/26/2005 15 Roof/Reroof AP PC 07/26/2005 24 Rough/Topout AP PC 07/25/2005 15 Roof/Reroof CO PC COMPLETE ROOF NAILING 07/25/2005 24 Rough/Topout CO PC COMPLETE PLUMBING 07/15/2005 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PC LITE POLES 06/27/2005 63 Walls WC PY EsGil Corporation In Partnership wit/i government for !Bui(suing Safety DATE: 12/2/04 IJ AP CANT JURI. JURISDICTION: 'Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of Nazarene Addition U The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.. Eli The check list transmitted 'herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recieck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: U Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Esgil Corporation U GA E MB LI EJ II PC' 11/23/04 Telephone #: Fax #: Enclosures: trnsmtl.dot EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for BuiWin.g Safety DATE: 10/15/04 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores SET:I ICANT U PLAWREVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of Nazarene Addition LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary a n d s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o m p l y with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisd i c t i o n ' s b u i l d i n g c o d e s when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by b u i l d i n g d e p a r t m e n t s t a f f . 1111 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified o n t h e e n c l o s e d c h e c k l i s t and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. U The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans ar e b e i n g h e l d a t E s g i l Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for. recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction t o f o r w a r d t o t h e a p p l i c a n t contact person. I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Dominy & Assoc., Att'n: Troy Schalge 2150 W. Washington, Suite 303, San Diego, CA 92110 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has be e n c o m p l e t e d . Person onta9te: TroSchalge(v) Telephone #: (619) 692-9393 Date 43/OY(by: Fax #: (619) 692-9394 Mai el phon%.-Fax--l'fn Person I REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 G 0 M 0 E DPC 10/5/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 I'LAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL [PLAN iCHECK Nb.: 04-3753 OCCUPANCY: A3 ITYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N I ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 6000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Church meeting rooms. ACTUAL AREA: 1610 Add'n only STORIES: one HEIGHT: 121t approx per UBC SPRINKLERS?: yes REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 10/15/04 OCCUPANT LOAD: 88 add'n Only DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/5/04 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the U n i f o r m B u i l d i n g C o d e , Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrica l C o d e a n d s t a t e l a w s regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the dis a b l e d . T h i s p l a n r e v i e w is based on.regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may h a v e o t h e r c o r r e c t i o n s based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Eng i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t , Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departm e n t s m a y b e r e q u i r e d prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All item s m u s t b e s a t i s f i e d before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regula t i o n s . P e r S e c . 1 0 6 . 4 . 3 , 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the v i o l a t i o n o f a n y state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a c o p y ) w h e r e e a c h correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, spe c i f i c a t i o n s e c t i o n , e t c . Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised pla n s . Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. All sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 2. Door 109 leading from the existing sanctuary to the new Narthex is not equipped' with panic hardware per note 40n sheet Al. 1 (Door shall have no latch or lock). The door schedule on sheet A6.0 references note 'K' for door 109 which indicates that the door is to be equipped with lock set. FOUNDATION Continuous footings must be 18" wide per the recommendations in the soil report by PSI dated June 25, 2004page 10. Revise the foundation plan to show the footings to be 18" wide. ' The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." STRUCTURAL All OK Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 PLUMBING and MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 1. The licensed designer must sign the approved set of the plans. PLUMBING (2000 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Provide the water closet specifications onto the floorplans. Note: If all plumbing fixtures are to be replaced, please Note so on the plans. 3. Include the existing water supply pipe sizing, the type of water closet (both new and existing) to be used (Flush tank or flush valve), the building water pressure, location of the pressure regulator (If applicable) and the TDL of the piping system. 4. In nurseries, schools, and other similar places where plumbing fixtures are provided for the use of children less than 6 years of age, water closets shall be of a size and height suitable for children's use. UPC Section 409.1 5. Provide gas line plans and calculations showing gas demands, pipe lengths, and pipe sizing. UPC 1217.0 (See mechanical comments) 6. Provide the following information concerning the water heater: Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC 501.0 Show P & T valve on water heater and detail the drain routing to the exterior. It may not be installed upwards from the valve. UPC 608.5 C. Provide combustion air design: Show opening sizes and routing of ducts. UPC 507.0 d. Detail the water heater flue installation: Size, routing, slope, and termination location (Minimum 8' from vertical surfaces). UPC 512.0 An expansion tank or other approved device is required if system pressure relief is not available due to the installation of backf low devices or certain pressure regulators. Please address. UPC 608.3 MECHANICAL (2000 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 7. For the replacement heaters: Provide the gas line piping design. Show how and the amount of combustion air that is available. Describe the source of outside air to the units. Detail the installation of the water tight pan required for the replacement furnaces. UMC 310.2 Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 e. Describe the access to the replacement units: Catwalk, access hole, lights and receptacle outlets. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ELECTRICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Morteza Beheshti All electrical sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. .. ELECTRICAL (1999 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Show or note on the plans the method used to limit fault currents to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. Please specify the fuse type shown. NEC 230-208 Please complete normal power circuit for all of the exit lights. I.e., the sanctuary side. UBC 1013.4 and NEC 700-16. Please provide a minimum of 1 foot-candle of emergency illumination at the floor level throughout the egress path including existing areas. UBC 1012.2 & NEC 700-16. Please describe what the "UFER" ground will be. (footage, conductor material and size, depth in footing.) . ENERGY CONSERVATION Please include all light fixtures in sanctuary on the lighting energy forms to match the total area shown. The Documentation Author, the Principal Envelope Designer and the Principal Mechanical Designer must sign the PERF-1 form. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Electrical or Energy plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 DISABLED ACCESS REVIEW LIST DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT TITLE 24 PEDESTRIAN RAMPS 1. Show handrails at each side of ramp(s) which are shown to be ~1 :20 (5%) in slope, per Section 113313.5.5. 2. Show that handrails are ~1 1/4" but ~1 1/2" in any cross sectional dimension. Additionally, show that the handrails are placed a ~:1 ½" from any wall, per Section 113313.5.5. 3. Show or note that handrails meet the following requirements, per Section 1133B.5.5: Are continuous. Are to be located —>34" but :538" above the ramp surface. Extend ~1 2" beyond both the top and bottom landings. Ends are to be returned. DOORS 4. Show a level area at the rest room entrance doors, per Section 11 33B.2.4.2: a) ~!60" in the direction of door swing. Plans show the distance between the rest room entrance doors and apposite wall is less than 60". To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall -at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. d Carlsbad 04-3753 10/15/04 /ALUATI0N AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 10/15/04 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores BUILDING OCCUPANCY: A3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N BUILDING ]1 PORTION AREA Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) church add'n 2600 63.00 163,800 remodel TI 1280 39.00 49,920 Air Conditioning ' 2600 3.60 ' 9,360 Fire Sprinklers 2600 1.80 4,680 TOTAL VALUE 227,760 Jurisdiction Code Icb IBY Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance V I$940.801 Plan check Fee by Ordinance lv I I $611.521 Type of Review: Li Complete Review Li Structural Only El Other ' Li Repetitive Fee ' Repeats El Hourly Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee I $526.85 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc PLANCHECK NO.: C9 3 73 City of Carlsbill ad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: BUILDING AD RESS: /çt PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Fl fl,fl 4.4 4 .4r%n EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item' you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. LI A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL, Please ttached report of deficiencies marked vi 0. ke necessary corrections to plans or spec'tj ns for compliance with applicable codes and'tandards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: Date Date: By: Date: By: T FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY O ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Ell Dedication Application Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER LI Dedication Checklist , City of Carlsbad LI Improvement Application . Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 LI Improvement Checklist ' Phone: (760) 602-2741 LI Neighborhood Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION LI Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No: LI Grading Submittal Checklist Lots: U Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: U Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet 602-2720 FAX (760) 602 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1ST NO 3RD El 0 1. 'Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: VE orth Arrow ,,K' Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets xisting & Proposed Structures ,,G Drivway widths xisting Street Improvements Existing or proposed sewer lateral roperty Lines (show all dimensions)/( Existing or proposed water service Easements . Existing or proposed irrigation service El 0 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service' (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. LI] LI] 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of'SF. Example: Tenant Improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office. F:\FarmeAKothy\MASTERS\Building Ploocheck Chist Form (Genenc).doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ProjectNo.______________________________________________________ E 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm / drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and / for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_15,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS El 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be / constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the / construction exceeds $_75,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements; A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the F:\FaroeAKathy\MASTERSBuiIding Plantheck Cklsi Forrn (Genenc).doc 3 Rev. 7/14100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD LI LII checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: LI LI 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_360.00 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: LI LI LI 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: LI LII LI 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 .06.030 of the Municipal Code. LI LI 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. LI LI 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: LI LI 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) F:\FarmerKathyMASTERS8uiIding Plancheck Ckisl Form (Generic).doc 4 Rec. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD LI LI LI 7d. No Grading Permit required. LI LI LI 7e.' If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS LI LI LI 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: LI LI LI 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: LI LI LI 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. LI 11 ired fees are attached L No fees required WATER METER REVIEW LI LI LI 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. F:'Farme,\KathyMASTERS\BuiIding Plaocheck Cklst Form (Qeneric).doc • Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). LI .12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If SO; at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water F:Fa,meAKothy\MASTERS\BuiIding Plaocheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc 6 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. LI LI El 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge.. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. - C n-ki-D I f 4-p 'tLc-t &U6JkEf F:\Farrrrer\Kothy\MASTERS\Building Plancheck Ckst Form (Generic).doc 7 Rev. 7/14/00 = $__ =$•- DIST. #3 =$______ /LOW SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET (çl) 0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. 0 Calculation based on building plan k pla Address:(AA'v0 ( 6 r wubmittal. 134.4Ve? 7" 3'3 Prepared by: Date: Checked by: ' Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. co 3 Types of Use: Sq. Ft.IUnits:I ED U s: Types of Use: Sq. Ft/Units: EDUs: (.3 ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADTs: Types of Use: Sq. Ft/Units: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS:_______ 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: 0 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 - ADTs/UNITS: X - FEE/ADT: 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________ UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: 5. SEWER FEE FEE/EDU:'IJ1 EDU's: X BENEFIT AREA: EDUs: X FEE/EDU: 0 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH ACRES: X FEE/AC:- 0 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE lof2 Word\Docs\Misforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00 Legend: Z. Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action, - Environmehtal Review Required: . YES FAT' f r'rRAriI rIrKI. N0XTYPEUWSSI 115 X _ Sec#r'a 3OS PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. GB 04 7S 3 Address I '+OD 1225 t-lores OC, Planner Barbara Kennedy Phone(760) 602-4626 APN: lSo— I/o— (PS- Type of Project & Use: tlhu,'tM reDd€ I Net Project Density: - DU/AC Zoning: I General Plan: LTh Facilities Management Zone: 1 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: ' Remaining net dev acres:..._ (For non-residential /development: Type of land used created by this. Circle One permit: '-s-- pJ• W1W1 k'J I - U - IkWI LP , :.' - 'CompIiance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE C U APPROVAL/RESO.NO. 55'c2 _DATE 311116.f PROJECT NO. C'Jr_o3() OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions whichje uire on Conditions of A,pprovaI:Ri10 d _y&Ls -h irb 'Al t4el~ -- o+ Pt Qe 5P.. Rôc.c es4Ad' I - 0 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance 'u • '. Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO____ - -' CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO____ If California Coastal Commission !Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite -103,- San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES____ NO____ ,• JfNO,cornplete.Coastal Permit Determination Form now. •- , CoastI ermit Determination Log # ' J-1 : (FgIlpW3JP Actions: j Stamp Building Plans as "Exempr' or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. ID 0 IncIusionary Housing Fee required: YES ___ NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry C'ornpieted? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance; enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\B!dgPinchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 r . V4•• 0 Site Plant 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easenents, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical"lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). - 2 Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. - Policy. 44 — Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines. Applicability: YES . NO________ . Project complies YES NO Y . Zoning: Setbacks: " Front:. fh '. Required •$i Shown 2 c' _or -_ec.ki . •lntérior.Side: Required o Shown ic c.r Street Side: Las 1o:'s Of. Required lot Shown o.r _ec.*L( Rear: Required ..b' Shown .r Top of slope: ti/Pt Required Shown Accessory structure setbacks: , Front: - Required Shown Interior Side; Required - _J Shown Street Side: Required . Shown Rear: . Required Shown 4.. ..sI. .. - Qkrri c r LIUULUI IW%4UIIU c_J I - - ' ' k I • 3 Lot Coverage Requird I o$ _r_6X Sho1wn 4 Height:Required .L_3& Shown 5. Parking: Spaces Required £''- Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional U ALd IC.P L 9AI'k (r'Si S 'L - 6A U1) t1-Q :-1-i- ceL-ds OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER 14/-D'A 2/i / o_i H:\ADMiN\COUNTER\B!dgPinchkRevChklst - Rev 9/01 Carlsbad Fire Department 043753 1635 Faraday ve. Fire Prevention Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan n Date of Report: 12/06/2004 Reviewed by: / Name: Dominy & Assoc. Address: 2150W. Washington St. Suite 303 City, State: San Diego CA 92110 Plan Checker: Job #: 043753 Job Name: Las Flores Church ld#:.:cBo43753.. Job Address: 1400 Las Flores Dr. Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; .therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. E Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards.. E Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliandè with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review 1st __________ 2nd __________ 3rd Other Agency ID FD Job # 043753 FD File # Carlsbad Fire Department 043753 ff 1635 Faraday Ave. Fire Prevention t Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 10/14/2004 Reviewed by: Name: Dominy & Assoc. Address: 2150W. Washington St. Suite 303 City, State: San Diego CA 92110 Plan Checker: _______________________________ Job #: 043753 Job Name: Las Flores Church Job Address: 1400 Las Flores Dr. Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and I or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Z Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. E .!ncomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review 1st __________ 2nd _________ 3rd • Other Agency ID FD Job # 043753 FD File # Requirements Category: Building Plan Requirement: Pending 05.11 Knox Box Knox Box required when access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life saving or fire-fighting purposes. The Fire Department will determine the location for the key box and provide an authorized order form. Knox box shall be required to be installed. Location to be determined at a later time. Requirement: Pending 05.18 Fire Extinguishers Required Provide one 2A1OBC fire extinguisher for each 6000 square feet or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. Provide notes on the plans that the extinguisher will be provided. Fire Extinguishers shall be required to be installed, please indicate on plans desired locations. Requirement: Pending 05.25 Exit Signs Section 1013.1 'Where Required. When two or more exits from a story are required by Section 1013.4, exit signs shall be installed at stair enclosure doors, horizontal exits and other required exits from the story. When two or more exits are required from a room or area, exit signs shall be installed at the required, exits from the room or area and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved by the building official. Group R, Division 3, and individual units of Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. Exits from rooms or areas with an occupant load of less than 50 when located within a Group I, Division 1.1, 1.2 or 2 occupancy or a Group E, Division 3 Day-Care occupancy. Illumination: Signs shall be internally or externally illuminated by two electric lamps or shall be of an approved self-luminous type. Power Supply: Current supply to one of the lamps for exit signs shall be provided by the premises' wiring system. Power to the other lamp shall be from storage batteries or an on-site generator set. Exit signs are not indicated on Reflected Ceiling plan, please revise. Requirement: Pending 05.26 ' Exit Illumination Exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied with light having intensity of not less than 1 footcandle at floor level. The power supply for exit illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' wiring system. In the event of its failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system of Group I, Division 1 Occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. Exit illumination is not indicated on Reflected Ceiling plan please revise. Page 1 10/14/04 tAl 1LoRs_CHu(C41 OF TtC- jA274J. t'Ot: .ED 14 S\AL z. 0 $FESSi0 o U 3-3240 m frrJ 2 CC- 2.7 CA _ •0••• 1. t O(cl 'jc L. ru,4t zr, Z-o I j' (6oii- /rt.i, M7.41I.) '(Z-O2-& I24-r( ON M/ryfL,z 0 f I it P,ecsJA, 4 f c1#4 mill ,3oq373 @L-I • rri /tt. Xf 1 4AJ HO tL '5 94i'J 1O-o" IAJOIt1 - (LI + -? K. g - -z fix1 fe '1 24b >.4'7z 1'•'! /1.2-s M 4q 10 Zf I1-/(.,( I) 43•7 4 OR ?xc p gp /1, 'I•, • 14t 17t46 •4;73 Z442_ - I . -4,'• • I D 3 •: / • U: '? c 1,c • - /25'- 2_j •, • AD-f $ a : 41-4 Xltr,* /cL04 Z'o TIi'J J;4l'( 4u c,3,v,,4ez xi &g' kM •> ___ 6 5 O-1I V,:. WM vvogu4j S7?eyf . 2. 2 0 1, I2.14// - 44 -p V -- x(s+,ove - Ctj ---- to r CAP B. LOW grl ,4 ç43#4 i,. LJM L3' - zI l V- v lc'(3.fl)( -I- q.(fz.cdD .4 / 1Z " r GEOTECIIMCAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED SANCTUARY & CLASSROOM BUILDINGS LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZA 1400 LAS FLORES DRIVE ° CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA U313 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JX Information f.ToBuildOn Engineering • Consulting • Testing October 1, 2004 Dominy & Associates 2150 West Washington Street, Suite 303 San Diego California 92110 Subject: Re-Issuance of Geotechnical Exploration Report, Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings, Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California. PSI Project No. 062-15035 I Gentlemen, In accordance with your request, we are herewith, submitting a copy of the original geotechnical engineering report without original signatures and this cover letter. Original signatures on the original geotechnical exploration report are of engineers no longer employed by Professional Service Industries, Inc. The reports were reviewed by the undersigned engineer and engineering geologist and are hereby re-issued by Professional Service Industries, Inc. I If you should have any questions afler'revi.ewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. . . I This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated.. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVI STRIES, INC. S. /7 Ronal (! No.2136 x 10/0 lbetNO 0422 .Jo'ujan G nach'r I 1 I Senior Project Enk Brach RCE 42204 13 7 I C C: (5) 213 Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 6867 Nancy Ridge Drive, Suite E • San Diego, CA 92121 • Phone 858/455-0544 • Fax 858/455-1170 June 25, 2001 Pastor Dwayne Edwards Las Flores Church of the Nazarene 1400 Las Flores Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Las Flores Church of the Nazarene 1400 Las Flores Drive Carlsbad, California PSI Project No. 062-15035 Dear Pastor Edwards: Professional Service Industries, Inc. is pleased to submit our Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the referenced project. This report includes our results of field and laboratory testing, and our recommendations for foundation and pavement design, as well as general site development. We appreciate the opportunity to perform this Geotechnical Study and look forward to continued participation during the design and construction phases of this project. If you have any questions pertaining to this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact our office. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Eduardo C. Dizon, RCE Project Engineer RCE 57217, Exp. 12/31/01 James W. Niehoff Geotechnical Consultant ECD/c Dale B. Bodman, RCE Vice President RCE 43242, Exp. 3/31/04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Las Flores Church of the Nazarene 1400 Las Flores Drive Carlsbad, California PSIFile No. 062-15035 PREPARED FOR Pastor Dwayne Edwards Las Flores Church of the Nazarene 1400 Las Flores Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 June 25, 2001 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PROJECT INFORMATION 2 Project Authorization ..2 *-Project Description 2 Purpose and Scope of Services 2 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 Site Location and Description 3 Site Geology 4 Subsurface Conditions 4 Groundwater Information 5 SEISMICITY 5 Regional Seismicity 5 Seismic Analysis 5 Hazard Assessment 6 Earthquake Design Parameters 7 EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS 8 Site Preparation .8 FOUNDATION & SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS .10 Structural Foundations 10 Floor Slab Recommendations 11 Lateral Earth Pressures and Resistance 12 Preliminary Pavement Recommendation 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 15 Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns 15 Drainage and Groundwater Considerations 16 Excavations 16 Trench Backfill 17 REPORT LIMITATIONS 17 FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Boring Location Map APPENDICES Appendix A: References Appendix B: Exploration Logs Appendix C: Laboratory Test Results Appendix D: Seismic Analysis - Computer Output Appendix E: Standard Guidelines For Grading Projects EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As requested, PSI has completed an exploration and evaluation of the subsurface conditions for a proposed Sanctuary and Classroom Buildings for the Las Flores Church of the Nazarene located at 1400 Las Flores Drive in Carlsbad, California. Test borings have been drilled and selected soil samples were tested in the laboratory. In general, the subject site is underlain by Quaternary-aged terrace deposits, which are locally mantled by between 3 and 4 feet of fill materials. The isolated fill materials were observed to consist of red-brown silty sands (SM), which were moist and loose to medium dense at the time of our exploration. The encountered terrace deposits, which extend to depths beyond the maximum explored depth of 25 feet below existing ground surface, were classified as red-brown silty sands (SM), which were typically moist and medium dense to very dense at the time of our exploration. Results of our laboratory testing indicate a very low expansion potential for the terrace deposit materials (UBC 18-2). Groundwater was not encountered within the maximum explored depth of 25 feet below the existing ground surface. It is our understanding that proposed building pads will be constructed in cut areas between 5 and 14 feet below the existing site grades. This planned site grading for the building pads will extend into dense to very dense terrace deposits. Based on the results of our subsurface exploration, the geotecimical conditions at the proposed pad grade elevation are considered suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations contained herein are properly implemented during the design and construction. It is our opinion that shallow foundations founded within the undisturbed competent terrace deposits will provide suitable support for the proposed structures. In pavement areas, the uppermost 6 inches of pavement subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). Details related to site development, foundation design, seismicity, and construction considerations are included in subsequent sections of this report. The owner/designer should not rely solely on this Executive Summary and must read and evaluate the entire contents of this report prior to utilizing our preliminary engineering recommendations in preparation of design/construction documents. Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I 2 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Authorization Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed a geotechnical exploration for a I . proposed Sanctuary and Classroom Buildings for Las Flores Church of the Nazarene located at 1400 Las Flores Drive in Carlsbad, California. Our services were authorized ,by Mr. Benny Broussard of the Las Flores Church of the Nazarene by signing our proposal, on May 26, 2001. I This exploration was 'accomplished in general accordance with PSI Proposal No. 062-026 dated May 14, 2001. Project Description Preliminary project information was provided by Mr. Troy Schalge of Dominy & Associates Architects. Based on our review of the provided information, we understand the proposed construction will include the following: I • A single-story sanctuary building of wood or steel-frame and slab-on-grade construction I .. A two-story classroom building of wood or steel-frame and slab-on-grade construction Approximately 5 to 14 feet of cut across proposed building pads Asphalt concrete and Portland concrete, pavements and drives I . Underground utilities and other associated improvements The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the provided I project information, proposed building location, and the subsurface materials described in this report. If any of the noted information is incorrect, please inform PSI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report if appropriate and if desired by the client. I PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site to enable an I evaluation of acceptable foundation systems for the proposed construction. This report briefly outlines the testing procedures, describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents geotechnical recommendations for foundation and pavement design and for general site I development. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I 3 I Our scope of services included drilling 5 soil test borings at the site to approximate depths of between 10 and 25 feet below existing ground surface. Our scope also included appropriate laboratory testing and preparation of this geotechnical report. This report briefly outlines the I testing procedures, presents available project information, describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents preliminary recommendations regarding the following: Grading procedures for site development. - Foundation types, depths, allowable bearing capacities, and an estimate of potential settlement. Comments regarding factors that will impact construction and performance of the proposed construction. I Our scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below, or around this site. Any statements in this report or on I the boring logs regarding odors, colors, and unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for informational purposes. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Site Location and Description The existing Las Flores Church of the Nazarene is located at 1400 Las Flores Drive in I Carlsbad, California. Existing structures at the site include a sanctuary and classroom buildings located within the eastern portion of the property. A paved parking lot occupies the southern area of the classroom building and the western portion of the property. Between the existing western I parking lot and sanctuary building is an elevated vacant lot that gradually slopes down towards the western parking lot. The site for the proposed sanctuary & classroom buildings includes the vacant lot and portions of the existing western parking lot. Active underground utilities appear to be present within the project site. The ground surface elevation at the project site range approximately from 165 feet above I Mean Sea Level (MSL) within the vacant lot to 145 feet above MSL at the existing parking lot. The ground surface elevation was estimated by interpolation from the preliminary site plan prepared by Dominy & Associates Architects. I Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 4 I Site Geology The subject site is located within the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province of I California. Our observations and analysis of readily available, pertinent regional geologic literature indicate that the subject site is underlain by Quaternary-aged terrace deposits (Tan & Kennedy, 1996). I Subsurface Conditions I The site subsurface conditions were explored with five soil test borings. Four of the borings were drilled within the proposed building pads to depths of between 20 and 25 feet below existing site grades. The other boring was drilled within the proposed pavement areas to a I depth of 10 feet below existing ground surface. The borings were advanced utilizing hollow stem auger drilling methods and representative disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples were routinely obtained during the drilling process. Drilling and sampling techniques were I accomplished generally in accordance with, ASTM procedures. As encountered in our exploratory borings, the subject site is underlain by Quaternary- aged terrace deposits, which are locally mantled by between 3 and 4 of fill materials. These fill materials were observed to consist of redbrown silty sands (SM), which were moist and loose to medium dense at the time of our exploration. The encountered terrace deposits, which extend to depths beyond the maximum explored depth of 25 feet below existing ground surface were classified as red-brown silty sand (SM), which were typically moist and medium to very dense at the time of our exploration. Results of our laboratory testing indicate a very low expansion potential for the terrace deposit materials (UBC 18-2). I The above subsurface description is of a' generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The boring logs included in the Appendix should be reviewed for specific information at individual 'boring locations. These I records include soil descriptions, stratifications, penetration resistances, locations of the samples and laboratory test data. The stratifications shown on the boring logs represent the conditions only at the actual boring locations at the time of our exploration. Variations may occur and I should be expected between boring locations. The stratifications indicated in the boring logs represents the approximate boundary between subsurface materials. The actual transition may be gradual. Water level information obtained during field operations is also shown on these boring I logs. The samples which were not altered by laboratory testing will be retained for 60 days from the date of this report and then will be discarded. I 'Select soil samples were tested in the laboratory to determine materials properties for our evaluation. Laboratory testing was accomplished generally in accordance .with ASTM procedures. A brief discussion of the laboratory tests performed and the results of our testing are I presented in Appendix C. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. p Groundwater Information Groundwater was not encountered within the maximum explored depth of 25 feet below I existing site grade. However, it is possible that transient oversaturated ground conditions at shallower depths could develop at a later time due to periods of heavy precipitation, landscape watering, leaking water lines, or other unforeseen causes. I SEISMICITY Regional Seismicity Generally, seismicity within California can be attributed to faulting due to regional tectonic movement. This includes the San Andreas Fault, the Offshore Segment of the Newport- Inglewood Fault, and most parallel and subparallel faulting within the State. The portion of California which includes the subject site is considered seismically active. The subject site is situated in UBC Seismic Zone 4. Seismic hazards within the site can be attributed to potential groundshaking resulting from earthquake events along nearby or more distant faulting. According to the regional geologic literature, the closest known late Quaternary fault is the Offshore Segment of the Newport-Inglewood Fault, located approximately 5.3 miles southwest of the site. Several potentially active and pre-Quaternary faults also occur within the regional vicinity. Currently, the seismological literature presents varying opinions regarding seismicity for nearby potentially active and pre-Quaternary faults. As such, the following Seismic Analysis only considers the effects of active faulting. Seismic Analysis The seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods for active Quaternary faults within the regional vicinity. According to the Aiquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 (revised 1994) Quaternary faults have been classified as active faults which show apparent surface rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). The site is not currently situated within a mapped Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997). Deterministic Analysis - Deterministic seismicity at the site was evaluated with the Eqfault computer program (Blake, 1995), which utilizes a digitized map (1998) of known late Quaternary earthquake faults, a catalog of the estimated credible and potential earthquakes for each fault, and a user specified attenuation relationship (Campbell, et. al., 1994). Output from the Eqfault program is presented in Appendix D. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. Based on our analysis, 18 late Quaternary faults were located within a 60-mile radius of the site. The site is subject to a Maximum Magnitude Event of 6.9 Magnitude along the Offshore Segment of the Newport-Inglewood Fault located approximately 5.3 miles southwest of the site, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.39g. The Maximum Magnitude Event is defined as the maximum earthquake that appears to be capable of occurring under the presently known tectonic framework. Hazard Assessment I Seismically-Induced Settlement of Soils - Within the depths of our exploration, the materials comprising the terrace deposits were observed to primarily consist of silty sands, which were generally medium dense to very dense at the time of exploration. Based on the anticipated I earthquake effect and the stratigraphy of the site, relatively minor seismically-induced settlement is likely to occur. Such settlement will probably affect relatively large areas so that differential U settlements over short distances are likely to be very small. Liquefaction - Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soil, I usually taking place within a soil medium exhibiting a uniform fine-grained characteristic, loose relative density, and low confining pressures when subjected to impact by seismic or dynamic loading. Based on the geotechnical evaluation including; area seismicity, on-site soil conditions, SPT N-values, and the observed lack of static groundwater within the explored depths, the site is considered to have a relatively low risk potential for soil liquefaction. I Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture - Breaking of the ground because of active faulting is not likely due to the absence of known fault traces within the project limits. However, due to the active seismicity of California, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. In this I light, the unlikely hazard of lurching or ground-rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on-site utility lines and connections. Landsliding - Seismically induced landsliding is not considered a hazard on, or adjacent to the site. This conclusion is primarily based on the absence of significant slopes in the project area. Tsunamis and Seiches - Inundation by tsunamis (seismic or "tidal waves") or seiches ("tidal waves" in confined bodies of water) are not considered to be a significant threat to the subject site due to the absence of proximal large bodies of water. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. VA Earthquake Design Parameters A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates that the nearest fault is I the Offshore Segment of the Newport-Inglewood Fault, located approximately 5.3 miles (8.5 km) southwest of the site. Ground shaking from this nearest fault and the other potentially active and pre-Quaternary faults in the region is the most likely event that will affect the site. According to U the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the site is located within UBC Seismic Zone 4. In conjunction with the soil classifications provided in Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, Standard Penetration Test values obtained from the borings indicate that the geologic subgrade at I the subject site can be characterized as soil profile type SD. The proposed structure should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the UBC 1997 edition, Volume II, Chapter 16, utilizing the following criteria: UBC Chapter 16 Seismic Parameter Value Table 16-I Seismic Zone Factor, Z 0.4 Table 16-J Soil Profile Type SD Table 16-Q Seismic Coefficient, Ca 0.44 Na Table 16-R Seismic Coefficient, C,, 0.64 N,, Table 16-S Near Source Factor, Na 1.15 Table 16-T Near Source Factor, N,, 1.06 Table 16-U Seismic Source Type . B If site-dependent earthquake response spectra or other specific design parameters are deemed necessary by the project structural engineer, or are required by the local governmental agency who has jurisdiction over the project, the geotechnical engineer should be promptly informed for further evaluation. In addition, design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdiction's building codes and standard practices of the Structural Engineers Association of California. I I I I I I I.] I Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA. Professional Service Industries, Inc. I .. 8 EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS I - The proposed construction at the site should be performed in accordance with, the following recommendations and the standard guidelines for grading projects included in Appendix E. In case of conflict, the following recommendations shall supersede those in the I appendix. I Site Preparation Initially, all deleterious material, as well as any existing structures, and utilities, must be removed from the areas proposed for construction. The contractor should refer to local codes or I ordinances for proper removal and disposal of any existing underground tanks, fuel lines and soil or other tank backfill material which may have been exposed to possible fuel leakage. Stripping operations should extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the proposed pavement and building limits. - It is our understanding that proposed building pads will be constructed on cut grade, I between 5 and 14 feet below the existing site grades. This will extend through existing fill soils to the level of dense to very dense terrace deposits. Based on the results of our subsurface I exploration, the geotechnical conditions at the proposed pad grade elevation are considered suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations contained herein are properly implemented during the design and construction. It is our opinion that shallow I foundations founded within the undisturbed competent terrace deposits will be suitable for support of the structures. I Since building pads are to be constructed on cut grade, additional fill is not anticipated within proposed structure areas. However, if additional fill will be required in other areas of the site, the first layer of fill material should be placed in a relatively uniform horizontal lift and be I adequately keyed into the stripped and scarified (to at least 12 inches) subgrade soils. Fill materials including import soil should be free of organic or other deleterious materials, have a maximum particle size of 3 inches or less, have a liquid limit of less than 45 and a plasticity I index of less than 20. Most of the upper on site soils appear to be suitable for use as structural fill. If a fine-grained silt or clay soil is used for fill, close moisture content control will be required to achieve the recommended degree of compaction. Structural fill should be moisture I conditioned and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Designation D1557. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I] I Fill should be placed in maximum loose lifts of 8 inches and should be moisture conditioned and compacted at 0 to 3 percent above the optimum moisture content. If water must be added, it should be uniformly applied and thoroughly mixed into the soil by disking or I scarifying. Each lift of compacted engineered fill should be tested by a representative of the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of subsequent lifts. The edges of compacted fill should I extend 10 feet beyond the edges of buildings prior to sloping. Non-structural fill adjacent to structural fill should be placed in unison to provide lateral - support. Backfill along building walls must be placed and compacted with care to ensure I excessive unbalanced lateral pressures do not develop. The type of fill material placed adjacent to below grade walls must be properly tested by the geotechnical engineer with consideration for I the lateral earth pressure used in the wall design. As discussed in the Subsurface Conditions section of this report, the site is underlain by Quaternary-aged terrace deposits, which extends to depths beyond the maximum explored depth I of 25 feet below existing ground surface. As such, it is anticipated that moderate to deep excavations (0 to 25 feet) will be generally rippable with conventional earthmoving equipment. The soils within those areas to receive asphalt concrete or Portland cement pavement should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches below finish subgrade elevations, moisture conditioned to a near optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). I All grading operations should be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1997 edition), PSI's Standard Guidelines For Grading Projects (Appendix E), and local governmental standards which have jurisdiction over this project. I Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 10 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS Structural Foundations Conventional continuous or isolated spread footings are considered suitable for structural support of the proposed Sanctuary and Classroom structure loads, provided they are entirely supported by competent native soil. Continuous footings supporting a one-story structure which are at least 18 inches wide and embedded at least 15 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade, may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Continuous footings supporting a two story structures which are at least 18 inches wide and embedded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade, may also be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Isolated spread footings supporting both one and two story structures which are at least 24 inches wide and also supported at a depth of at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade, may also be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. The allowable soil bearing values may be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, including wind and seismic forces. Appropriate foundation reinforcement should be provided in accordance with the Structural Engineer's design. Lateral loads may be resisted by any rational method which incorporates sliding friction and/or passive earth pressure. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.35 may be utilized at the concrete-soil interface. The design may incorporate an allowable passive earth pressure of 200 psf/ft below a depth of 1 foot, provided that concrete is poured tightly against in-place competent native materials. Where sliding friction and passive pressure are used conjunctively, the passive pressure value should be reduced by 1/2. I The foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of PSI prior to steel or concrete placement to assess that the foundation materials are capable of supporting the design loads and are consistent with the materials discussed in this report. Soft or loose soil zones I encountered at the bottom of the foundation excavations should be removed as directed by the geotechnical engineer. Cavities formed as a result of excavation of soft or loose soil zones should be backfilled with lean concrete or dense graded compacted crushed stone. After opening, foundation excavations should be observed and concrete placed as quickly as possible to avoid exposure of the foundation bottoms to wetting and drying. Surface run-off water should be drained away from the excavations and not be allowed to pond. If possible, the foundation concrete should be placed during the same day the excavation is made. If it is required that foundation excavations be left open for more than one day, they should be protected to reduce evaporation or entry of moisture. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 11 I Based on the known subsurface conditions and site geology, and past experience, we anticipate that properly designed and constructed foundations supported on the recommended materials should experience maximum total and differential settlements of less than one inch and I 1/2 inches, respectively. While settlement of this magnitude is generally considered tolerable for structures of the type proposed, the design of masonry walls should include provisions for I liberally spaced, vertical control joints to minimize the effects of cosmetic "cracking". The results of our laboratory testing of the near-surface soils indicate a negligible concentration of soluble sulfates. As such, Type II cement may be used in concrete that will be in contact with the near surface soils at the site. Be advised that as a part of the foundation design election process, there is always a cost I benefit evaluation. Although we are providing recommendations for a specific foundation type, we have not accomplished the cost/benefit evaluation. Floor Slab Recommendations The floor slab can be grade supported either by properly compacted structural fill or I competent native soil. The slab section may be designed by the structural engineer using a coefficient of subgrade reaction of 120 pci and assuming a very low expansion potential (UBC I 18-2) for the near-surface soils at the site. Based on geotechnical considerations, it is recommended that the interior slabs be at least 5 inches in nominal thickness, and minimally reinforced in accordance with the structural engineer's rquirements. Care should be taken by I the contractor to ensure that the reinforcement is placed and maintained at slab midheight. Floor slabs should be suitably reinforced and jointed (in accordance with Structural Engineer's recommendations) so that a small amount of independent movement can occur without causing I damage. Slabs should be underlain by a capillary break of a thickness of at least 4 inches, I consisting of clean sand or gravel. In moisture sensitive flooring areas, such as carpeted or linoleum covered areas, a 6-mil visqueen sheet should be placed midheight within the capillary break material. The visqueen sheet should be sealed along the edges to prevent lateral migration I of soil moisture from adjacent non-visqueen areas. Prior to placement of clean sand and slab-on- grade, the visqueen sheet should be thoroughly inspected for cracks, punctures, tears, and holes. If necessary, the visqueen should be replaced or patched to assure a fully functional entity. I Some minor cracking of slabs can be expected due to shrinkage. The potential for this slab cracking can be reduced by careful control of water/cement ratios in the concrete. The I contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot weather to minimize the cracking of slabs. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted fill, tile, or other crack-sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete I slabs. All slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 12 Lateral Earth Pressures and Resistance We anticipate that the proposed construction will include retaining walls. The following I preliminary lateral earth pressure values for level or sloping backfill are recommended for retaining walls backfilled with suitable granular soils possessing an internal friction angle of at least 32 degrees. I Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Conditions Level Backfill 2:1 Sloping Backfill Active 35 55 At-Rest 55 70 __TPassive (Compacted Fill) 300 150 (sloping downward) Unrestrained (yielding) cantilever walls should be designed for an active equivalent pressure value provided above. In the design of walls restrained from movement at the top (non- yielding) such as basement walls, the at-rest pressures should be used. The above values assume backfill soils will have a very low expansion potential and free-draining conditions. If conditions other than those covered herein are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressures should be provided on an individual basis by the geotechnical engineer. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with the Foundation Recommendations section of this report and reinforced in accordance with structural considerations. For all retaining walls, we recommend a minimum horizontal distance from the outside base of the footing to daylight of eight feet. It is recommended that all below-grade walls and retaining walls be provided with a positive foundation drainage system. A typical below-grade wall drain would consist of a minimum 4-inch flexible or rigid perforated pipe surrounded by 3/4 inch crushed rock and wrapped in a non-woven geotextile fabric (consisting of Mirafi 140N or approved equivalent). The subsurface drainage system should be tied to the storm drainage system, allowed to daylight downslope, or collected in a sump and pumped out. This system typically is installed directly on top of the retaining wall footing. Retaining wall backfill should consist of approved granular material. This fill material should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density (as determined by ASTM D1557). Flooding or jetting of the backfill should not be permitted. Granular backfill should be capped with relatively impervious fill to seal the backfill and reduce the potential for saturation. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 1 13 I Cantilever or restrained walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one-third the anticipated surcharge pressure in the case of the cantilevered walls (active conditions), and one-half the anticipated surcharge in the I case of restrained walls (at-rest conditions). It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to I retaining structures can result in wall pressures exceeding design values and corresponding wall movement greater than normally associated with the development of active conditions. In this I regard, the contractor should take appropriate precautions during the backfill placement. Lateral soil resistance developed against lateral structural movement can be obtained from the passive pressure value provided above. Further, for sliding resistance, a friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. The total resistance may be taken as the sum of the frictional and passive resistance provided that the passive portion does not exceed two- thirds of the total resistance. Preliminary Pavement Recommendations I The recommended thicknesses presented below are considered typical and minimum for the assumed parameters. We understand that budgetary considerations sometimes warrant I thinner pavement sections than those presented. However, the client, the owner, and the project principals should be aware that thinner pavement sections might result in increased maintenance costs and lower than anticipated pavement life. I The appropriate pavement section depends primarily upon the type of subgrade soil, shear strength, traffic load, and planned pavement life. For preliminary purposes, we have assumed I traffic indices of TI=4.5 for parking areas and TI=6.0 for those areas subject to relatively heavy traffic. These assumed traffic indices should be verified by the project civil engineer prior to construction. Based on the results of laboratory testing, we have utilized an R-value of 70 for I preliminary pavement section design purposes. Since an evaluation of the characteristics of the actual soils at pavement subgrade can only be provided at the completion of grading, the following pavement sections should be used for planning purposes only. Final pavement designs should be evaluated after R-value tests have been performed On the actual subgrade material. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 14 i W. . Pavement . ,, . Ass'uifiedTfdffic--'1,1` ,. ,. - 'Conditions: Index;'. ' ' ection j Parking Areas 45 2.5 inches A.C. over 4.0 inches Class 2 Aggregate Base Heavy Traffic 6.0 3.0 inches A.C. over 4.0 inches Class 2 Aggregate Base I Where rigid concrete pavements are planned to support vehicular traffic, the following minimum sections are recommended: Pavement , t •-.-. : AssumedTraffic f.. . .. . - .,Pke on v-1 ; m Light Traffic 4.5 5.0" PCC on Compacted Subgrade Heavy Traffic 6.0 6.0" PCC on Compacted Subgrade Portland Cement Concrete pavement sections should incorporate appropriate steel reinforcement and crack control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. We recommend that sections be as nearly square as possible and no more than 12 feet on a side. A 3,500 psi mix may be utilized. The actual design should also be in accordance with design criteria specified by the governing jurisdiction. Asphalt Concrete (A.C.), Portland Cement Concrete, and Class 2 aggregate base should conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications and American Concrete Institute (AC!) codes. Aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction (based'on ASTM Test Method D1557) prior to placement of A.C. The upper 12 inches of pavement subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned as necessary to achieve a near optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I 15 If pavement areas are adjacent to heavily-watered landscaping areas, we recommend some measures of moisture control be taken to prevent the subgrade soils from becoming saturated. It is recommended that the concrete curbing adjacent to the landscape areas extend below the aggregate base to reduce the potential for irrigation water to saturate the aggregate base and subgrade soils. In downgrade areas, the aggregate base should extend laterally a sufficient distance to allow any water entering the aggregate base a path to exit. Portland Cement Concrete swales should be designed if asphalt pavement is to be used for drainage of surface waters. U CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS It is recommended that PSI be retained to provide observation and testing of construction activities involved in the foundation, earthwork, and related activities of this I project. PSI cannot accept any responsibility for any conditions which deviated from those described in this report, nor for the performance of the foundation if not engaged to also - provide construction observation and testing for this project. Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns The upper soils encountered at this site may be sensitive to disturbances caused by construction traffic and to changes in moisture content. During wet weather periods, increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. In addition, soils which become wet may be slow to dry and thus significantly retard the progress of grading and compaction activities. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather. Much of the on-site soils may be susceptible to erosion during periods of inclement weather. As a result, the project Civil Engineer/Architect and Grading Contractor should take appropriate precautions to reduce the potential for erosion during and after construction. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service -Industries, Inc. 16 Drainage and Groundwater Considerations Groundwater was not encountered within the maximum explored depth of 25 feet below I existing site grades. It should be noted, however, that variations.in the ground water table may result from fluctuation in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation, and other factors that may not have evident at the time of our I exploration. This sometimes occurs where relatively impermeable and/or cemented formational materials are overlain by fill soils. In addition, during retaining wall excavations, seepage may be encountered. We recommend that a representative of PSI be present during grading I operations to evaluate areas of seepage. Drainage devices for reduction of water accumulation can be recommended if these conditions occur. I Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavation, on floor slab areas, or on prepared subgrades of the construction area either during or after construction. Undercut or excavated areas should be sloped toward one corner to facilitate removal of any I collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be provided to reduce infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the building and beneath the I floor slabs. The grades should be sloped away from the building and surface drainage should be collected and discharged such that water is not permitted to infiltrate the backfill and floor slab areas of the building. I Excavations I . In Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 209 (October 1989), the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Construction Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, part 1926, Subpart P'. This document was issued to I better insure the safety of workmen entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by this federal regulation that excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement excavation or foundation excavations, be constructed in accordance with the new OSHA guidelines. It is our I understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed, the owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. I The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's "responsible I person", as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in local, I state, and federal safety regulations. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I . 17 We are providing this information solely as a service to our client. PSI does not assume responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's or other parties I compliance with local, state, and federal safety or other regulations. Trench Backfill I Except where,. extending perpendicular under proposed foundations, utility trenches should be constructed outside a 1:1 projection from the base-of-foundations. Trench I excavations for utility lines which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted. ' Utilities should be bedded and backfihled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least 1-foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill shall be typical on-site soil I or imported soil which should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness, moistened or aerated to 0 to 3 percent above the optimum moisture content, and mechanically compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations submitted are based on the available subsurface information obtained by PSI and design details furnished by Dominy & Associates Architects for the proposed project. If there are any revisions to the plans for this project or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this or any supplemental report prepared by PSI are encountered during construction, PSI should be notified immediately to determine if changes in our recommendations are required. If PSI is not retained to perform these functions, PSI will not be responsible for the impact of those conditions on the project. The geotechnical engineer warrants that the findings, recommendations, specifications, or professional advice contained herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 18 After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be retained and provided the opportunity to review the final design plans and specifications to check that our engineering recommendations have been properly incorporated into the design documents. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Las Flores Church of the Nazarene and Dominy & Associates Architects for the specific application to the proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings for the Las Flores Church of the Nazarene located at 1400 Las Flores Drive in Carlsbad, California. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. 4 ,a.._,_ •• 1<1 - I i a I ?' f. , FIGIJRES' & X. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. U . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I PSI A-300-4 (I) Se ' •i ..•.•: : .-.•)• IL! * r:T)j Imquist ail W )V \ :LJ , > - Sewage I - .. - — Cent r lop SITE LOCA [ON - 'Buen is 1125 \ \ \tRP ins / flUE A I TA AVE I V KNOWES AVE 'S \ \ I 28 \\\cT LAGUNA rary and N'Ce • OQ High \: Sch \\\o H Ii rson ch N Is I ifh Sc 150 50 / PROJECT NAME PROPOSED SANCTUARY & CLASSROOM BLDGS. FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 1400 LAS FLORES DRIVE PROJECT NO. DATE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 062-15035 JUNE 2001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IndustriesProfessional Service ______ (1 . -.5 1_ii . ...I... V. .•.. -'i:tr 41 \;:7 4 SANCTUARY AND S . I ' r fl &s jy • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING LEGEND: 4 B-5 [ EXISTING HOUSE Ii I NO SCALE PROJECT NAME - - - PROJECT NO. - - - PROPOSED -SANCTUARY& CL-ASSROOM BLD9S. 062-15035 LAS FLORES CHURCH OF,.THENAZARENE FIGURE 2 - BORING LOCATION MAP 14OOLAS -FLORES rnuvE- DATE CARLSBAD,CALIFORNI'A . JUNE 2001 rs, A.14 fl I I I , 4-- I' I I I I I I I 'H, I I • Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA - Professional Service Industries, Inc. i REFERENCES I i. Blake, T.F., 1995, Documentation for Eqfault Version 2.01 Update, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software, Newbury Park, California, p. 79 and appendices. I 2. Blake, Thomas F., 1998, New Fault-Model Files For FRISKS? and EQFAULT, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software, Newbury Park, California. I3. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y., 1994, Near-Surface Attenuation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Worldwide Accelerograms Recorded From 1957 to 1993, Proceedings, Fifth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol I III, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, pp. 283-292. Foundations and Earth Structures, Naval Facilities Design Manual DM-7.2, 1982, I Department of Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 224 p. Hart, E.W. and Bryant, W.A., 1997, Fault-rupture Hazard Zones in California, I California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Hunt, R.E., 1984, Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Manual, McGraw-Hill, New I York, NY, 983 p. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, scale 1:750,000, California Division of Mines and Geology. I 8. Maps Of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones In California And Adjacent Portions Of Nevada, 1998, California Division of Mines and Geology. I 9. Proceedings, Seminar on New Developments in Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation and Implications for Engineering Design Practice, January 1994, Applied Technology Council and U.S. Geologic Survey, Redwood City, CA, 18 Chapters. I 10. Tan, S.S. and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, DMG Open-File Report 96-02, Geologic Map of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey, and San Marcos 7.5' Quadrangles, San Diego County, I California, Plate 1, California Division of Mines and Geology, Scale: 1:24,000. 11. Soil Mechanics, Naval Facilities Design Manual DM-7.1, 1982, Department of Navy, I Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 348 p. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. Tokimatsu, A.M. and Seed, H.B., 1987, Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol 113, No. 8, p. 861-878. Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 3 Volumes. US Geological Survey, San Luis Rey, California Quadrangle, United States Department of the Interior, Scale: 1:24,000, 1968 (photo-revised 1975). Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazard in California, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 91, No. B12, P.2587-12631. Winterkorn, H.F., and Fang, H.Y., 1976, Foundation Engineering Handbook: New York, NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 751 p. Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I: H I . I I I, d — • • APPENDIX B C EVPLORAIIONLOGS " I H I ' I I' I I. • I: I ' • Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I Professional Service Industries GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION The Unified Soil Classification System is used to identify soil unless otherwise noted. SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS N: Standard Penetration Value: Blows per foot of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a standard split-spoon penetrometer. Qu: Unconfined compressive strength (tsf). Qp: Penetrometer value, unconfined compressive strength (tsf). Mc: Water content (%). LL: Liquid limit (%). P1: Plasticity index (%). ôd: Natural dry density (pcf). V: Apparent groundwater level at time noted after completion. DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS SS: Split-Spoon - 1 3/8 l.D., 2 O.D. SB: Spilt-Barrel - 2 3/8' I.D., 3" O.D. ST: Shelby Tube - 3" O.D., except where noted. BS: Bulk Sample. AU: Auger Sample. DB: Diamond Bit. CB: Carbide Bit. WS: Washed Sample. RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION TERM (NON-COHESIVE SOILS) STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE Very Loose 4 or less Loose 4t010 Medium Dense 10 to 30 Dense 30 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 TERM (COHESIVE SOILS) . QU - (TSF) Very Soft 3 or less 0 -0.25 Soft 4 to 5 0.25-0.50 Medium Stiff 6 to 10 0.50-1.00 Stiff 11 to 15 1.00-2.00 Very, Stiff 16 to 30 2.00-4.00 Hard 31 or More 4.00 + PARTICLE SIZE Boulders 8 in + Coarse Sand 5mm-0.6mm Silt 0.074mm-0.005mm Cobbles 8 in-3 in Medium Sand 0.6mm-02mm Clay 0.005mm Gravel 3 in-5 mm Fine Sand 0.2mm-0.074mm Professional Service Industries, Inc. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Boring B - I Project Name: Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Date of Boring: June 12, 2001 Site: 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California Project No.: 062-15035 DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE CLASS N Dd Mc REMARKS SURFACE - LIIL Dark brown Silty Sand, slightly moist, loose to medium - SM - — dense, fine to medium grained. ' - SS-1 24 - Terrace Deposits; Red-brown Silty Sand, moist, dense, 5' - SM - line grained. - SS-2 36 6.4 - 10'_ - = SB-I 45 121.1 7.8 SPlCorrected - Blow Count - — Grades to very dense, occasional coarse grained sand. 15' - - SS-3 50/6" - 20' - SS-4 92/9" 7.1 - 25' - SS-5 57 Boring Terminated at 25 feet. = No Groundwater Encountered. - - - Backlilfed on 6/12/2001. - 30' - - . 40' - 45'_ I - — 50'_ - PSI A- 100.9 I I I I I I I I I I Professional Service Industries, Inc. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Boring B -2 Project Name: Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Date of Boring: June 12, 2001 Site: 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California Project No.: 062-15035 DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE CLASS N I Dd Mc REMARKS SURFACE - LIJL Dark brown Silty Sand, slightly moist, loose to medium - SM - dense, line to medium grained. = SS-1 18 26 116.9 8.9 - SPT Corrected Terrace Deposits: Red-brown Silty Sand, moist, medium dense, _ SB-I SM - line grained. Blow Count - Grades to very dense. 10' - : SS-2 50/5.5 7.9 - - 15' - - Grades to dense, occasional coarse sand. - SS-3 47 - - 20' SS-4 38 Boring Terminated at 20 feet. : = No Groundwater Encountered. - - - Backfllled on 6/12/2001. - 25' - — - 30' - -.35 40' - 45'_ - - 50' - PSiA.iOo-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Professional Service Industries, Inc. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Boring B -3 Project Name: Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Date of Boring: June 12, 2001 Site: 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California Project No.: 062-15035 DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE CLASS N Dd Mc REMARKS SURFACE - ii1L Dark brown Silty Sand, slightly moist, loose to medium - SM = dense, line to medium grained. : SS-1 11 22 8.8 Terrace Deposits: Red-brown Silty Sand, moist, medium dense, 51 SS-2 SM line grained. - Grades to very dense. 10 - : SS-3 75 15' - - SB-I 50/5.5' 111.3 6.3 SPT Corrected - Blow Count - 20' - - - SS-4 96/9" : Grades to light gray color. = - 25' - SS-5 77 = Boring Terminated at 25 feet. = = - No Groundwater Encountered. Backfilled on 6/12/2001. 30' 35, 40' 45, - 50' - PSI A.100.9 Professional Service Industries, Inc. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Boring B -4 Project Name: Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings Date of.Boring: June 12, 2001 Site: 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California Project No.: 062-15035 DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE CLASS N Dd Mc REMARKS SURFACE: 3" AC Terrace Deposits: Red-brown Silty Sand, moist, medium dense, — tine grained, occasional black organics. - 55-I 27 8.4 - - 5' - - - - SB-I 28 124.5 7.3 SPT Corrected - Blow Count - 10,_ - - - SS-2 29 - - Grades to very dense. 15' - - - - SS-3 52 - - Grades to gray color, dense. - - — 20' - SS-4 3! = Boring Terminated at 20 feet. = = No Groundwater Encountered. - - - Backtilled on 6/12/2001. - 25' - - — 30' - — 35'_ - 40' 45' - 50'_ - PSI A-] 00-9 I I I I I I I I I I Professional Service Industries, Inc. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Boring B - 5 Project Name: Proposed Sanctuary& Classroom Buildings Date of Boring: June 12, 2001 Site: 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California Project No.: 062-15035 DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE CLASS N Dd Mc REMARKS SURFACE: 3" AC Terrace Deposits: Red-brown Silty Sand, moist, medium dense, SM - fine grained, occasional black organics. SS-1 30 - 5, - - SB-I 25 - - Grades to very dense. - - 10' SS-2 58 Boring Terminated at 10 feet. : = No Groundwater Encountered. - - - Backfllled on 6/12/2001. 15' 20' 25' 30' 35' 40' 45' 50' PSI A.lO0.9 I : I • - I . I :- U APPENDIX C 69 ' LABORTORYTEST RESULTS I I .- I I * Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA , Professional Service Industries, Inc. LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Laboratory Testing Program Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative engineering properties. Tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing Materials or other accepted standards. The following presents a brief description of the various test methods used. Classification - Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classifications were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples in general accordance with ASTM D2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Exploration Logs, Appendix B. Particle Size Analysis - Particle Size Analyses were performed on selected representative samples in general accordance with ASTM D422. In-Situ Moisture/Density - The in-place moisture content and dry unit weight of selected samples were determined using relatively undisturbed samples from the linear rings of a 2.38 inch I.D. modified California Sampler. The dry unit weight and moisture content are shown on the Boring Logs (Appendix B). I Expansion Index - Expansion index testing was performed on representative samples of the on-site soils, remolded and surcharged to 144 pounds per square foot in general accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 18-2. I Direct Shear Tests - Consolidated, drained, direct shear tests were performed on remolded samples in general accordance with ASTM D-3080. The remolded samples were I tested in a saturated condition using normal loads of 1 ksf, 2 ksf, and 4 ksf. Moisture-Density Relationship - Laboratory compaction tests were performed in I general accordance with ASTM D1557, Method A. A mechanically-operated ram was used during the compaction process. I Soil Sulfate Test - In order to estimate the concrete degradation potential of soils, the content of soluble sulfates was determined in general accordance with Cal Test Method 417A. I R-Value Test - R-Value testing was performed on representative soils anticipated to be exposed at subgrade in parking and drive areas. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Test Method 301 was used to determine exudation and expansion values. I Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. I .1 I I I I .. • I I .. 4 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY TEST (ASTM D 1557) 46 OPTIMUM MOISTURES CATIO MPj'YI CONTENTJ B-4 @ 1-5' 138.0 pcf 7.5 % RESULTS OF EXPANSION INDEX TEST (UBC 18-2) -i .4 15 J*, ~Qarl IV. B-4 @ 1-5' 1 (Very Low) U I. I , I. I i . . . Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. RESULTS OF DIRECT SHEAR TESTS (ASTM D 3080) I fbtS EOQN; COHESIONINTERCEPT IMM B4@14'* 0 330 * Remolded to 90% of the Maximum Dry Density (per ASTM D1557) SOIL SULFATE TEST (ASTM G51) I - - - SAMPLE LOCATIO .SOI2UBEESULFATES DEGREE OFATTAcK B-4 @ 2' <50 ppm Negligible RESULTS OF R-VALUE TEST (Caltrans Test Method 301) - ,'7 . '- '- . '-: * '- . - ,• "t,,", • ••-; s • - , 1 SAMPLELOCATION i, B-S @ 1-3' 70 Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA Professional Service Industries, Inc. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — IL I llJII!' 19M ' iiuiuu•• 1 iuiuuiu IlliulU. uiuiu• uiuuiui•uuuiiiu• ____ ____iiuiuiu•_iUiUiiU IIlL1U• uuiuuiu• uiiuui• ____nuuuuu• uiuiuiu_iuuiii•• iiuiuiu• _ii• iuiuuui iuuuuiu• iliiItU _uiuiuiu• iiuiiu•• .__I... iiuuuua uiuuuu•• uiuuiu• iiuiuuu• uiiuuu••____ ____II•_11111111 iiiuii• _HUiLI•_uiuiuiu•_iuuuuiu ii• iuuuuuu• iuiuuui• uuuuuu• uuuiui•• unui• IU. uiuiuui• iiiuuuu• iiiuuui iuuiuuu• uuuuuuu _______ I.... uuuuui•• iiuuuu•• uuuuuu.' uuuiuu•• uiiiuui• ____ ___ iuu• iuuuuiu iuuuui•• iiiuui•i uiuiuiu• iuiiui• iinuui•________ ___ uuuui•• iiuuuu• iiuuuuiuuuuu•u iiuuuuu ____ .8 ___ ___uuuuuuu• uuuuu•• iiuuu•iuuiuuu• iiiiui•u________ mu.. iuuiui• iiiuuuu• iiuiuuu iuiuuu uuuuiu•• • uuuuuuu• uiiuuuu• miuuu ;uuuuu iiuiiuu•____ ____ __ui• iiiuuiu IIIIIIUU uiuuuiu uiuuuiu ____IIIIIIUU____ ____II. uiuuiu•• uuuiuiu iiiuui• iiuuuiu uiuiiui• iuuiu.. uiuuuuu• iiiiuu• niu.0 uiuuiu• iiiiuiu• iiuiuiu• iiiuuuu iiuuui•• uuiiuiu• iuiiu•• iuuuu•• uuiiuu• iiiuuuu• nuui•• 1.1.-I. i. •.xsi. sx.isx.r.i. cj FEW hI iii Ii'i * .i. III1IIWX Classification I7r!T SILTY SAND (SM) -- -- • SILTY SAND (SM) 1400 LAS FLORES DRIVE REPORT OF SOIL ANALYSIS 062-15035 PSI A-100-7 I I :. . . I . I' I . ?t I - SEISMIC 41\4LYSIS - COMPUTER OUTPUT . ..:. I. ,. . I,. .. I • .1 •. I Las Flores Church of the Nazarene. Carlsbad. CA - •Professional Service Industries, Inc. I DATE: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 ********* ****** * * * * * ************ * * * * EQFAULT * * * * Ver. 2.20 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digitized California Faults) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: Las Flores Church of the Nazarene JOB NUMBER: 062-15035 JOB NAME: Proposed Santuary & Administration/Classroom SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.1705 N LONGITUDE: 117.3402 W SEARCH RADIUS: 60 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 1) Campbell & Bozorgnia (1994) Horiz. - Alluvium UNCERTAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma) : M SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGSCE.DAT SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuation File, F=Fault Data File) : A ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC SITE ----------------------------- PARAMETERS Page 1 I I IMAX. CREDIBLE EVENTI MAX. PROBABLE EVENTI I I APPROX. I ------------------- II ------------------- I IABBREVIATED IDISTANCE I MAX .1 PEAK I SITE II MAX. I PEAK I SITE I I FAULT NAME I mi (km) ICRED. I SITE IINTENSI PROS. I SITE IINTENSI I I I MAG.IACC. gl MM II NAG. IACC. gl MM I I-------------------------- I ---------I SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK I 52 ( 801 -----I 6.801 ------ I 0.0381 ------ v II -----I II 6.201 ------I 0.0231 ------I IV I I ---------I SAN JACINTO-ANZA I --------------------------I 46 ( 74)1 -----I 7.201 ------ I 0.0641 ------ VI II -----I II 6.901 ------I 0.0491 ------I VI I I--------------------------I---------I-----I SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VAI 46 ( 701 6.901 ------I 0.0491 ------II VI -----I II 6.801 ------I 0.0451 ------I VI I-------------------------- SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINOI 58 I --------- I ( 94)1 ----- I 6.701 ------ I 0.0301 V ------ II II ----- I 6.701 ------ I 0.0301 ------ I V I I IELSINORE-COYOTE -------------------------- I --------- MOUNTAIN I 58 I ( 9 )I ----- I 6.801 ------ I 0.0331 ------ V II II ----- I 6.201 ------ I 0.0191 ------ I Iv I I-------------------------- I IELSINORE-J ULIAN I 24 --------- I ( 38)1 ----- I 7.101 ------ I 0.1321 ------ VIII II II ----- I 6.401 ------ I 0.0741 ---- --I VII I ------------------I ----------------- ELSINORE-TEMECULA 23 - --------- I ( 38)1 ----- I 6.801 ------ I 0.1051 ------ VII II II ----- I 6.301 ------ I 0.0691 ------ I VI I I --------- I 52)1 ----- I 6.801 ------ I 0.0701 ------ VI II II -----I 6.301 ------I 0.0451 ------I VI I IELSINORE-GLEN IVY I I-------------------------- I WHITTIER 1 50 --------- I ( 81)1 ----- I 6.801 ------ I 0.0401 ------ V II II -----I 5.901 ------I 0.0181 ------I IV I ICHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinol 47 ( 76)1 6.701 0.0401 V H 5:501 0.0151 IV I I I --------- IEARTHQUAKE VALLEY I ------- --------- 44 --------- I ( 71)1 ----- I 6.501 ------I 0.0371 ------ V II II ----- I 5.701 ------ I 0.0181 ------ I IV I I-------------------------- I ICOR0NAD0 BANK I 22 --------- I ( 35)1 ----- I 7.401 ------ I 0.1831 ------ VIII II II ----- I 6.301 ------ I 0.0761 ------ I VII I I I jNEWPORT-INGLEWOOD(Offshorl -------------------------- 5 --------- I ( 8)1 ----- I 6.901 ------ I 0.3931 ------II X II ----- I 5.801 ------ I 0.2211 ------ I IX I I-------------------------- I ROSE CANYON 1 6 --------- I ( 9)1 -----I 6.901 ------ I 0.3851 ------ X II II 5.701 -----I------I 0.1951 ------I VIII I I--------------------------I---------I-----I INEWPORT-INGLEWOOD ABa5I 45 ( 73)1 6.901 ------ I 0.0501 ------ VI II II ----- I 5.601 ------I------I 0.0161 IV I I--------------------------I IPALOS VERDES I 36 ---------I ( 5)I 7.101 -----I------I 0.0811 ------II VII II -----I 6.201 ------I 0.0371 ------I V I I--------------------------I ICOMPTON THRUST I 55 ---------I ( 88)1 -----I 6.801 ------ I 0.0521 ------ VI II II 5.801 -----I------I 0.0241 ------I IV I I--------------------------I IELYSIAN PARK THRUST I-------------------------- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * * * I 57 ** * * * ---------I-----I ( 92)1 * ** ****** I ---------I-----I------ ------ I 6.701 0.0451 I * * * * * * * ** ****** ------ VI ------ II II II * ********* ----- I 5.801 -----I------I-------I ------ 0.0221 * * * * * I ------ I IV I * * * * * * * -END OF SEARCH- 18 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.3 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.393 g LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: I 0.221 g 1 'I I I . I I, I. - A PPENDIX E ?f t. 1 11~71 a Z tL STANDARD GUIDEliNES FOR GRADING PROJECTS , ç U I- 1. I. I , I. I -. I .. 1 Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, Carlsbad, CA -I IV Professional Service Industries, FEB-07-2005 NON 10:45 AN CARLSBAD ENGINEERING FAX NO 760 602 1052 P 02 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLJ.AN PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR 01H $iXPA1iON This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit wlthout;a completed school fee form. Project Name: Las P/oces CLycck 4--- -3.4. Yltzc r e h Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.- -. j) O-cS-OO Project Applicant j J4 J (Owner Name): Project Description: 52 c F - 13 S Fcer7o8) (0—hurLO Building Type: Residential: Number of New Dwellirio Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/lndustral: Square Feet Floor Area 52 City Certification of - Applicant Information: Date: - Car1sbd Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real 215 Mate Way Car1sb4 CA 92009 (331-5000) San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By At Or htrs -Utevt&Dlstrict San Dieguito Union High School District 101 Sà.$h Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitaa Blvd. Encinitts, CA 92024 (944.4300 ext 166) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753.6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ('owne?) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above Is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of urri18 or square footage is found to be incorrect and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above deacnbe9 project(s), or that the person executing this declaration Is authorized to sign on b-aJf gythe 9wnp1./ Signature: Date: (/, 200 -- 1635 Farad Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 9200e-7314 • (760) 802.2700 Revi44/20/00 Building Counter • (760) 802-2719 • FAX (70) 602-8558 FEB-07-2005 NON 1046 AN CARLSBAD ENGINEERING FAX NO 760 602 1052 P. 03 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities, This is to certify that the applicant Ilatec: on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may Issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER GJia*QVYW n/II- GAYLEN AtEIVIAN DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT JARLSBAD,UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 225 EL CAMINO REAL .RLSAD, CA 2OO brccj Oft5 Revised 4/20100 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 06-23-2005 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCRO51O4 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1400 LAS FLORES DR CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 1561106500 Lot #: 0 Applied: 06/01/2005 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: LSM Reference #: CB043753 Plan Approved: 06/23/2005 Issued: 06/23/2005 ,—Proje : CHURCH OF NAZ- REV FOUNDATION Inspect Area: DEPTH STRUCT DETAILS FOR ROOF & SHEER WALL Applicant: Owner: NICK TAYLO -' LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE ST 1400 LAS FLORES DR- 234151 VERDUGO DR 92653 CARLSBADCA 92008\ Plan Check Revision Fee/ '< $180.00 Additional Fees / / . $6.00 / r / •/j// Total Fees: $180.00 Total Payments To Date: / . ' $0.00 Balance Due: $180.00 / \;; •• i ) IAP , ' 1 tNCORPORATkD 1952 i:-<"l 270 06/23/05 0002 01 02 80 00 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions 01 which you have previously been given p NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 6o-t 375•3 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 - S . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. - EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Depjsit Validated By D ate ~10Zs VAC C O/T/,' L151ve Address (include Bldg/Suite U) Business Name (at this address) Li f/i'itCS '&Wt/ Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total U of units Assessor's Parcel U Existing Use - Proposed Use Description of Work • SQ. FT. #of Stories U of Bedrooms U of Bathrooms i2 6,111 Ocr,+,&j jai() voofs/Tfi6eL * II c /. 7-4- V fi(_ Z J 151 '-' t a 0€.. L,f6 (i.vft HI1.L CA- zr3 9YY j7q/J/ Name Address City State/Zip Telephone U Fax II 3 APPLICANT 'tontractor 0 Agent for Contractor 0 Owner 0 Agent for Owner LA%),j..cI/_&jq7IvC7'iP,v j,ç,,#&..gi,/DI2 _2,1 960-J 919, Name Address City State/Zip Telephone U 4 PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone U gg (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars (85001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone U State License U ?'52... 70 2 License Class Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License U Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 (have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the, work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 181001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful; and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE . DATE 7iÔiN(ERERDECIARAtiONt I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). o I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). - 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for Construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an applièation.for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I plan to provide portions.of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number /type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE - DATE rE mis SEcjION bROSQBfl4LpUiIj PER S-ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the Outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES; A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS__________________________________________________________ AS 10t, 41(T-fFLC f I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans Is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. - OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or Construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comm eri 80,d!%W(Secti 106.4.4 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE _ UniformBuildingCode). DATE 6 -,- . W E: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance - City Business License U EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Building Safety DATE: 6/20/05 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753(PCR05-104) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of Nazarene Addition IJ APPLICANT O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE The 8-1/2 X 11 plan revision sheets transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessa r y and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Nick Taylor Telephone #: Applicant Phoned In Date contacted: 6/20/05 (by: CM) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ El PC Phone In trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGU Corporation In Partnership wit/i government for !Bui(Iing Safety DATE: 6/13/05 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753(PCR05-104) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores SET:I U APPLICANT U PLAN REVIEWER O FILE PROJECT NAME: Las Flores Church of Nazarene Addition E The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. El The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. U The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. El The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Laubach Const., Inc., Nick Taylor 23151 Verugo Dr, #201, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Nick Taylor Date contacted: '(/.3/o-5 (bç) Mail 1'lephone V Fax /In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Esgil Corporation El GA LIMB EIEJ [I PC Telephone #: (949) 374-1519 Fax #: (949) 699-0175 Enclosures: 6/5/05 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-3753(PCR05-104) 6/i3/05 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of -two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Submit two copies of full size revised roof framing plan sheet S3 showing the size and 'location of the new 6x12 supporting the existing roof as shown on the sketches provided by the engineer. Provide two copies of full size revised foundation plan sheet S2 with all the revised details referenced to this sheet. Include on the foundation plans the location of the deepened footings as provided by the design engineer 'on 8-1/2 X1 site plan sheet prepared by PSI engineering. END OF REVIEW To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-3753(PCR05-104) 6/13/05 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753(PCR05-104) PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 6/13/05 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1400 Las Flores BUILDING OCCUPANCY: A3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Rev.Frmg & Fdn NA Hrly Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction COde ICb IBY Ordinance I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance [j Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I $180.001 Type of Review: El Complete Review El Structural Only El Repetitive Fee Repeats Based on hourly rate El Other Hourly 1 1.5! Hours * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $144.00I Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc We h Information lIf..!JToBuildOn Engineering • Consulting • Testing March 17, 2005 Laubach Constructtion, Inc. 23 15 1 Vcrdugo Drive, Suite 201 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Subject: Additional Grading and Foundation Recommendations, Proposed Las Flores Church of the Nazarene - New Child Center Addition, Las Flores Church, 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California. PSI Project No. 059- 55015. Reference: Appendix A Gentlemen: In accordance with a request from Mr. John Labach, this letter has been prepared to confirm our discussions as to additional grading and foundation recommendations for the proposed addition at the subject site. These recommendations arc based on our review of the referenced grading plan and the recommendations contained in our referenced geotechnical exploration report. As indicated on the referenced grading plan by Fuscoc Engineering, a proposed fill slope with a height of approximately seven feet will be constructed to the west and south of the proposed addition to generate a relatively level building pad. Fills within the proposed limits of the addition will range from approximately three feet in the western limits of the addition to cuts of less than one foot in the northeastern portion. This condition will result in a cut/fill condition. It was recommended in our geotechnical exploration report that all foundations should be founded in similar soils conditions, either firm natural ground or compacted fill material. Based on this recommendation, either the entire building pad will require transition undercutting or the deepening of foundations into firm natural ground. As discussed, due to the fact that the proposed addition is being constructed adjacent to the existing sanctuary structure and the new slab-on-grade will likely be tied to the existing foundation system, removal and recompaction to generate a compacted fill below new foundations would not be practical. It is therefore recommended that all new foundations be extended into firm natural ground. The geotechnical exploration report recommended that foundations have a minimum width of eighteen inches and be founded a minimum of fifteen inches below finish pad grade for footings designed with a 4,000 psf bearing capacity. As specified by the 2001 California Building Code, single-story structures may be founded on foundations with a minimum width of twelve inches. Based on the proposed construction, the proposed addition can be founded on continuous Pe Dc ID-! Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 6867 Nancy Ridge Drive, Suite E • San Diego, CA 92121 • Phone 858/455-0544 • Fax 858/455-1170 c,Q-G- CM OLL 7S3 C •-. Las Flores Church of the Nararene PSI Project No. 059-55015 March 17, 2005 Page 2 footings with a minimum width of twelve inches and founded a minimum of eighteen inches below finish grade or into firm natural ground, whichever is greater. A bearing capacity of 2,500 psf may be utilized for said footings. However, if the original allowable bearing capacity is to be utilized in design, then the previously specified width of footing -(18 inches) shall apply. It is anticipated that the western footings may require deepening up to two-feet to attain firm natural ground. The estimated depth of footing to attain firm natural ground from finish pad grade is shown on -the attach plot plan, Figure No. 1. Isolated pad footings which support proposed roof overhangs or canopies beyond the main building limits should have a minimum width of 24 inches and be founded a minimum of 18 inches below finish grade. Said footings should be founded in firm natural ground which will require deepening along the south and west sides of the structure. Approximate depths to bottomsof proposed footings are shown on Figure No. 1. It is further recommended that during construction of the proposed fill slope that minimal removals or benching of the existing gentle slope in the building pad area be performed to minimize the depth of the foundation deepening. Additional grading and design recommendations contained in the referenced Geotechnical Engineering Services report are considered applicable for the proposed construction. If you should have any questions after reviewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, Professional Service Industries, Inc. onald S. Halbert Senior Project Engineer RCE 42204 Cl V Cc: (3) Submitted OF C (2) Las Flores Church of the Nazareene (2) Dominy + Associates Architects P:\Geotechnical Projects\2005\059-550 15, Las Flores Nazarene\Update Recommendations-r.doc Las Flores Church of the Nararene PSI Project No. 059-55015 March 17, 2005 Page 3 APPENDIX A References: "Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Sanctuary & Classroom Buildings, Las Flores Church of the Nazarene, 1400 Las Flores Drive, Carlsbad, California", prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc., dated June 25, 2001. PSI Project No. 062-15035. "Site Plan, Las Flores Church of the Nazarene - Child Center, Carlsbad, California", prepared by Dominy + Associates Architects, dated November 19, 2004 (October 1, 2004 City Submittal). "Site Grading Plan, Las Flores Church of the Nazarene - Child Center, Carlsbad, California", prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, dated November 19, 2004 P:\Geotechriical Projects\2005\059-550 15, Las Flores Nazarene\Update Recommendations-r.doc 0 1, 0 1 0 / / / / / I NEW 'ADDITION 3 F /2FT\ EXISTING STRUCTURE , , , / 5' .1 5A_i A '-5. .. :,-- ,1 I LEGEND: /2FT APPROXIMATE DEPTH ¶M 7 o.. DEEPENED CONTI14UoySFb4T1 j4. APPROXIMATE DEPT" bF DEEPENED I SO LATE DPó\TTIGi A D I "i Information I 6867 NANCY RIDGE DRIVE #E !I To Build On SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 Er&gineeringConsuZting Testing I (858) 5440544 Pv.o1 N.iw Dr.s 9, DS.' 1 F(i N: N. LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE RSH 3/05 55015-I NEW CHILD CENTER -1 IApp.dDcIP.dNc: I " DEEPENED FOOTING LOCATIONS RSH 059-55015 ....:. i'l 2oZI&T: '-A jtOG C-Hu O/6 71v c'42k ,Q =Iv çz To 4vj'op ?CIS-r. 1O 1+1-14 ftzo~ j(2O - 14 )s7 .z3 R 73I j j S324O A S fr43 1if Ur -ro : T I I' P'R 09 poit 3)s3 N) tN/'r't. 4AiL 02~ I i.jewr6 I n (z pocT w/ All A 64 vv/ i r,4.eD&p goP4 2LaL Fr4 11XL (t -49:4, - t.J, (4 6,4 - $1, Sb p-r o/J jv)7 -r4 = t_ - pos-r 1S-rtIJ4 C-O$T. pi4• C— LIt ©40 / (j/O& C, 't47 P16 TRJsc POp ZX P°P4s Mjt -A-.c FL.rtc CHU,cH !&-3u- 0 'f kr-rt4 - Toy Ot3fl#.J (42" SfriJ DL- 40o 476 i1- M L4'- z'S&•Fl, 1' SL&: L_- J',I 1 . -i4 c e) )(lZ *1(N) .zLL,l Ix )-o" 2 - 4 -. 14 (N)W/ 2 -1- simf 50.0 'A-B6" 9/ -r.f p4oJr It RQt' e7lo5E'f IC-f30 - --I- WE - __ oll #4' .< 246 5/8"pL, 7/dcI Q 5,fc) CT IC4g / 5T2 °P,! 4'J -1 (i1-oxf2 t Iec + /O)(- . /t4 5 43- - t<(. I 9L4opJ J.%-ø?-r 1ø o sla L NOT54ui4J ~cs W. (;) I Ls FL-oV4s c44)1W4 OF -94l Nk71E 5JL. iJ1t11- a1 19, 7 v6' Øc7 1½Lt. '/'J1. PT 2e41 F76 I ( 09-&p AroM ta" r0 6 O9p) rm -1ff%i T1 I 4N 0 •• 3324 CM Aj t•-• t'44i' F1tr4 A- lm 1tt)Q 5e& tier I 3'Mij c'cy,Q os loLl I ----- 'I'.p;g LJ $01. hbWJ Vrt : - ----- I "M //J PB,F Solt. EEO L 11; Psc4i Q5t: Zo r Oef/eAJ / "I øri OP 7- /" ?,2H rax iiu inar ir zuu r.0 ~.- - 0-5 -12 dV— s FT 1 4 1 ;\ \ rIt ....... I_:3 ••_ 1 ' i I NEW I I t ADDITION 4<3FT \ EXISTIN R fl FT \ / STRUCTURE 51, / 415 ;,/. fiL.- I •H L--' •6 // . V...- V• •__ 1S.'S.. '... • -. V I b / LEGEND: \\r\1\ /2FT i-1-i1rr t\ - APPROXIMATE DEPTH 9F DEEPENED CONTI14UPySi'Fb4T1 1 '. APPROXIMATE DEITLbF \ \ . • \DEEPENED I 42. AV Jnforinaior&. I 887 NANCY MDCI DRIVE E To Build O I SAN DIECO, CALI0P.NL4. 92121 Ingin.9rfrlQ•Co'n.4tri,gT6Ung (868) 644-0544, Is1 ?1. M - I Pi laJ LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE I ks!! 2/06 65018-1 I NI, cgll.,D CYNTRA I I. 1 DEEPENED FOOTING LOCATION! IAszrI IS. .Lks LR&S eff Th2/J4z4/ZcJc Jo i 5 i-re i/is t -rt pi 4 /c J-7-p ( y JM,z CONT(14c-to(Z. croc7 Cr IN L c K(T144 TfZJ$ 5 t3c,4-(LIM6 OM ZX ST tAt4 oi..ji'. ft A/' -ret II/Z h M:,e.. I TA4'.tsiOT HoJr4 5c 2. L I3I (Vtitiy 3bB S'I7) -e,c!l'':, )f () 720SS •$1'p NALt. 'o_,(z O D'-/ ee OL4 ?S3 (p -5kfam TttSP, PLC4IL MO2I1II DOE To TCb 9 Sire rt4 OPITON 77cJL WWI4.. 5-; - Fm. ?O1 - lee &'v, Pit Rej!L () 1P-V tT1 PHIP 2. çlb ExisT. L L p ( -. M-V U12. HG I1M1 NOT ' 5-2. '3 Ile 4d12, cTo — eN _ - :z. OF flocc - MriiO 2&4L ro FrIT .E wM&. FL.us'i HR LOA-01146 TO P05--t 6) P L. I jJ L O)J xfr/1v 4 c247. P-r 1 1T -T() r413 P 4-14 LA '.a2rr O400X/2/44x/.3i twI24 <a3/ ipt 15 k 7 . / MJ 1w/ t ti& 's0er" /côc7 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 12-22-2005, Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCRO5191 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1400 LAS FLORES DR CBAD PCR 1561106500 Lot #: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW CB043753 LAS FLORES CHURCH-REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS PER SDGE Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: 'Status: PENDING Applied: 10/11/2005 Entered By: LSM Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Applicant: Owner: LAU BACH CONSTRUCTION LAS FLORES CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 1400 LAS FLORES DR 23151 VERDUGO DR 92653 CARLSBAD CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Fee $120.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $120.00 P1 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: . Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have greviously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has nreviouslv ôtherwisp Axnirecl PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ,CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 - 04 ?S3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. I EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Al Of 771c Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use . Proposed . Description of Work SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedroçms 4 of Bathrooms =NTAOTR pç &c,,.s y-f ~L3C £f ç LOA?1 P ETt ) - K /v'/c/c_7V/81 2 3 /57 _c/7/'o 2i/,-,,'ñ11uii _4_7yyj)i/J77 Name . Address . City State/Zip Telephone # Fax #), IT LIT & fL .Q,4A'C/-F4Ih2,(_iI4c.3AC54_1T0-vsT--fr'cr/0'v_/!/(_c6 Name . Address . City State/Zip Telephone # L x 015 Name S Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption., Any violatiàn of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars l$5001). Name . . Address . City State/Zip. Telephone # State License # 'G_'.'•7(Ø . License Class . City Business License # g_7 Designer Name . Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Coda, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. . . . . I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the. Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company . Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS i1601 OR LESS) C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is -unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE -... DATE 5. Fop I hereby affirm that I am exemptfrom the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). - 0 I, as owner of the property,- am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions- Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts. for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). - - o I am exempt under Section - Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed pràperty improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. - - 3. - I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): . I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address I phone number / contractors license number): - - - I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to, provide the work indicated (include name! address / phone number-/ type of work):. PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE S ' DATE' MP - ______ — ON Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-TannerHazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feat of the outer boundary of a sch0015ite? 0 YES 0 NO - IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. NN Twimmw ' T ; I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME - LENDER'S ADDRESS N9 irM E-710-72 -- - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building Construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cits of Carlsbad to-enter upon the above mentioned - property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. - OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or Construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every. permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced w 180 days from. the date ofuch permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced I - erf 180yon .4.4 Uniform Building Code). - V\APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -__,_g-_f'-"T_. DATE - WHIT . File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance - EsGil Corporation In (Partners Flip with government for Building Safety DATE: 10/20/05 0 AMLICANT 0 JURIS. JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD 0 PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 REV2 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 LAS FLORES DR. PROJECT NAME: ELECTRICAL SERVICE & FEEDER REVISIONS (LAs FL-oI-s. 6 4.0 P- S) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially, comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have, significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. .i .. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being heldatEsgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of thecheck list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward tothe applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: KRUSE&ASSOC. 12245 WORLD DRIVE, STE. E SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: (858) 676-9776 Date contacted: 101405(byi) Fax #: (858) 6769744 Mail' Telephone ,/Fax ./In Person LI REMARKS: By: Morteza Beheshti Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA [I MB flEJ fl pc 10/13 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 ,• Fax(858)560-1576 CAll LSBAD 04-3753 REV2 10/20/05 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 REV2 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1400 LAS FLORES DR. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/13 10/20/05 REVIEWED BY: Morteza Beheshti FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform PlumbingCode, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws. regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other, corrections based on laws and .ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department.' or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must.bë satisfied......... before the plans will:be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations: •PerSeo106.4.3;n' 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the.'vibltionof:any. state, county or citylaw. Please make all corrections on the originals and submit two new complete sets of prints to:. . ESGIL CORPORATION. . . . .. .. ... :, To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. . Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? El Yes El No ' C/iRL.SBAD 04-3753 REV2 10/20/05 ELECTRICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Morteza Beheshti ELECTRICAL (2002 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 1. Please specify a ground electrode system at the existing sanctuary building and a connection to both building disconnecting means for panels "A" & "B". NEC 230.70, 250.32 Note: The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Morteza Beheshti at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. CARLSBAD 04-3753 REV2 10/20/05 I VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3753 REV2 PREPARED BY: Morteza Beheshti DATE: 10/20/05 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1400 LAS FLORES DR. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: NA TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NA BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) . Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Air :ConditioniflgH ...... .. ..,; . . . . . :. Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE, Jurisdiction Code . CB ': I By Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit. Fee 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee . I $120.00! Type of Review: LI Complete Review fl Structural Only LI Li Other Repetitive Fee . . 'Repeats Hourly • ii Hour * Esgil Plan Review.Fee I $96.001 * Based on hourly rate Comments: ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW ONLY. Sheet of 1 macvalue.doc FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMiT' APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO. P01k bfl 9 EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By__________________________ 1Date I PROJECT INORMATION - c - /7- Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) ///-s F/os C/c'.&ch' 0r 77/ Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Description of Work SQ. FT. /CCTIfiC4L 2, ONTACT PERSON (If different from en v: K__A///c 7AL >7/8f 23/5I Na'me Address #of Stories # of Bedro T s 4 of Bathrooms tF s /_o,i o1 - A,c, 4-vnh''i.s CA 7r931)5"J77 State/Zip Telephone # Fax C. Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # 4 PROPERTY OWNER - Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # vi,'CONTMTdR (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or CountV'which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). Name Address City - State/Zip Telephone # State License I License Class City Business License I Designer Name Address City - State/Zip Telephone State License I - " - - - .. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date____________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure worker,' compensation coverage I. unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE i Nil zk- I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not Intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed Contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section ____ Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (fiim) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number /type of work):_________ - PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE BUII,DINQ PFRMITSQ NY*L -. ,_t c Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention oroaram under sections 2nc. 29URIA ,, IRRIA ,,, .,, c... .,. -' PCRO519I 1400 LAS FLOREs DR CBAD LAS FLORES CHURCH-REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS PER SDGE \ PCR \ Lot#: LAUBACH CCNSTPI Ir.TIrJ 1' -rD aE,-I f LAD/ OQG- cLa 04 7S IDIO/O C9-IL CLm 1 IN C43 u Ls( Li '-I Oci2 ,4-i2 :- k? ci 5 ( e QScL ( • U /23 - - •