The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1405 BUENA VISTA WAY; ; CB004803; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 07/18/2001 Resident i a I Permit Permit No:CB004803 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: 1405 BUENA VISTA WY CBAD RESONTL SubType: SFD Status: ISSUED Lot #: 0 Applied: 12/19/2000 6 Reference #: Plan Approved: 07/18/2001 1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 07/18/2001 5 Bathrooms: 4 Inspect Area: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Orig PC#: SFD 3337,GAR 636 SF, DK 97 SF,COV ENTRY 178 SF Plan Check#: $291,339.50 Construction Type: VN Entered By: JM Applicant: PLEIN BOB 202 2541 STATE STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008 760-729-7964 Owner: 5008 07/18/01 0002 Ol. 02 CGP 25552-09 ~ Total Fees: $26,392.59 Total Payments To Date: $840.50 Balance Due: $25,552.09 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Recl. Water Con. Fee $1,293.08 $0.00 $840.50 $0.00 $0.00 $29.13 $1,755.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 D5/8 Meter Size Add'l Recl. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Master Drainage Fee: Sewer Fee: Additional Fees: TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $80.00 $1,871 .OO $0.00 $5,302.38 $4,894.50 $0.00 $0.00 $432.00 $488.00 $0.00 $210.00 $60.00 $70.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $1,959.00 $193.00 $26,392.59 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: &&x Clearance: ~ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter cdlectively referred to as %&exactions." You have 90 days from the date this pit was issued to protest imposition of these feeslexactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously othewise expired. t- PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE 0 PLAN CHECK NO. iO3 4 EST. VAL. l< 173 Plan Ck. Depo ,Cdlr Validated By& !, Lz ,y Date Legal Description Lot No. Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units \"sG--x3c - @\ R&&-kkZ Name Address city State/Zip Telephone # PANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance. also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9. commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code1 or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged xemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the ap licant to a 'vi1 penal y of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Cw. CCZ~ ,, >s&\ Sm ST- *Mb\ &&bd ,bifj\ ~WOV ~~Q~->+-~*CZ Name Address City Statelzip Telephone # State License # Q\QSQ B License Class B\ City Business License # VU^^^^ Telephone Designer Name .\+ s*lh \ 33% hS.t RPVQ Ui- Mi q--C\NO-%3-\ StatelZip Address City T'RG *-. State License # 0 of the work for which this permit is issued. @ issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier anqolicy number are: Insurance Company N- h- Policy No. 3%cwuLkLp- OQ' Expiration Date LbiL[b\ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$lo01 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation. damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit IS I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion. the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 1. 2. 3. 4. number I contractors license number): 5. of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE I am exempt under Section I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES UNO I (have I have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate. supervise and provide the major work (include name I address I phone I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number /type Business and Professions Code for this reason: program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 0 YES 0 NO I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit) of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION. Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -- DATE /z Tu.., C- WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Inspection List Permit#: CB004803 Type: RESDNTL SFD NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SFD 3337,GAR 636 SF, DK 97 SF,COV EN Date Inspection Itern Inspector Act Comments 06/20/2002 19 06/20/2002 19 06/20/2002 89 0511 312002 39 0511 012002 39 1211 912001 22 12/10/2001 17 12/10/2001 18 12/06/2001 17 12/06/2001 18 12/06/2001 18 12/06/2001 23 12/03/2001 16 I 1 /28/2001 14 11/27/2001 14 11/26/2001 14 1011 712001 13 1011 71200 1 1 5 1011 Ol2001 83 0811 512001 11 08/15/2001 12 0811 312001 1 1 0811 012001 12 08/08/2001 21 08/07/2001 22 08/02/2001 22 Final Structural Final Structural Final Combo Final Electrical Final Electrical SewerNVater Service Interior LathlDrywall Exterior LathlDrywall Interior LathIDrywall Exterior LathIDrywall Exterior LathIDrywall GasITesff Repairs Insulation Frame/SteeUBolting/Weldin Frame/Steel/BoItingNVeldin Frame/Steel/BoltingNeldin Shear PanelsIHD's RoofIReroof Roof SheathingIExt Shear FtglFoundationlPiers SteellBond Beam FtglFoundationlPiers SteelIBond Beam UndergroundIUnder Floor SewerNVater Service SewerNVater Service RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RI wc AP co NR PA AP AP AP co co AP AP AP NR CA AP AP NR AP AP co NR AP NR AP PM PLEASE FINAL - GMR - ALL SIGNATURES ARE ON CARD EMR ARRIVED AT 2120PM - NOBODY ON SITE LEAVE SEWER CONNECTION OPEN - OK TO BACKFILL OK TO TAPE SEE NOTICE SEE NOTICE NO SUPER ON JOB MISSING DOWELLS AND TIES Friday, June 21,2002 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/20/2002 Permit# CB004803 Inspector Assignment: RCB Title: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Description: SFD 3337,GAR 636 SF, DK 97 SF,COV ENTRY 178 SF Type: RESDNTL SubType: SFD Job Address: Location: 1405 BUENA VISTA WY Suite: Lot 0 APPLICANT PLEIN BOB Owner: PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT Remarks: PM PLEASE Total Time: Phone: 76041 97879 Inspector: R CR Requested By: JOHN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 19 Final Structural !2c 84 FIUhL Comf36 +P F/~AL - Gm/3 - I --d Associated PCRs Date 0511 3/2002 0511 012002 12/19/2001 12/10/2001 12/10/2001 12/06/2001 12/06/2001 12/06/2001 12/06/2001 12/03/2001 11/28/2001 11/27/2001 11/26/2001 1011 7/2001 10/17/2001 1011 0/2001 0811 5/2001 0811 5/2001 0811 3/2001 0811 0/2001 08/08/2001 08/07/2001 Inspection History Description Act lnsp Comments 39 Final Electrical 39 Final Electrical 22 SewerNVater Service 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior LathlDrywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior LathlDrywall 23 GasflesVRepairs 16 Insulation 14 FrameISteellBoltingNlding 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingNlding 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingNlding 13 Shear PanelslHD's 15 RoofIReroof 83 Roof SheathinglExt Shear 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam 11 FtglFoundationlPiers 12 SteellBond Beam 21 UndergroundlUnder Floor 22 Sewerwater Service co NR PA AP AP AP co co AP AP ' AP NR CA AP AP NR AP AP co NR AP NR RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC EMR ARRIVED AT 2:20PM - NOBODY ON SITE LEAVE SEWER CONNECTION OPEN - OK TO BACKFILL OK TO TAPE SEE NOTICE NO SUPER ON JOB MISSING DOWELLS AND TIES City of Carlsbad Bldg For: 12/06/2001 Permit# CB004803 Title: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Inspection Request Inspector Assignment: RCB Description: SFD 3337,GAR 636 SF, DK 97 SF,COV ENTRY 178 SF Type: RESDNTL SubType: SFD Job Address: 1405 BUENA VISTA WY Suite: Location: APPLICANT PLEIN BOB Owner: Remarks: Lot 0 Phone: 76051 84546 Inspector: t?U3 -. Total Time: Requested By: KIM CD 18 Date Entered By: KAREN Description Act Comment Exterior LatWDrywall cs L- &P o.d.G& dP Associated PCRs 12/03/2001 11/28/2001 11/27/2001 11/26/2001 1011 712001 1011712001 1 011 01200 1 OW1 512001 OW1 512001 08/1 312001 08/10/2001 08/08/200 1 08/07/200 1 08/02/2001 InsDection History Description Act lnsp Comments 16 Insulation 14 Frame/SteeUBolting/Welding 14 FramelSteeVBoltingNVelding 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingNVelding 13 Shear PaneldHD's 15 RooflReroof 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 SteellBond Beam 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 SteellBond Beam 21 Undergroundunder Floor 22 Sewerwater Service 22 Sewerwater Service AP RC AP RC NR RC CA RC AP RC AP RC NR RC NOSUPERONJOB AP RC AP RC CO RC MISSING DOWELLS AND TIES NR RC AP RC NR RC AP RC c NOTICE (760) 602-2700 *. _- CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAV AVENUE FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? D YES PHONE cpp BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Em Corr>oration In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 05/ 14/01 J U Rl SDl CTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4803 SET: I11 PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel # 1 PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A 8s B) 0 FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein Date contacted: (by: ) Mail Telephone Fax In Person Telephone #: Fax #: / REMARKS: Please submit another copy of manufacturer rooduss drawings for building elevations (A & B) to CITY. By: Kal Tumalieh Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC , 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EZTCorDoration In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 03/08/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4803 0 PLAN REVIEWER SET: I11 c1 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel # 1 PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A 6b B) cl 0 IXI IXI I7 0 IXI 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant‘s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. Hermosa Homes 2451 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008 The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein Date contacted: ‘428 (by:p ) Fax #: (760) 729- REMARKS: By: KalTumalieh Enclosures: Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Mail delephone FaC In Person uslq Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ c] PC 02/27/01 tmsrntl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego;California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4803 03/ OS/ 0 1 NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industriaI projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 1. - 2. 3. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). The requested information is not submitted. Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Section 106.3.3. Are the site block walls part of this Permit if so then provide structural calculation and structural details. The requested information is not submitted. Is the site block walls part of this Dermit ? ves or no. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. 0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION The requested information is not submitted. Carlsbad 00-4803 03/ 08/ 0 1 8. 9. 12. i a. 19. 20. 30. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks. The requested information is not submitted. Please provide detail and cross reference to plans. See attached detail 0 MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Sheet 17 is not found. STRUCTURAL Please clarify if the soil report is applicable to both Master Map. Lots 5 and 6. Yes or No. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. The requested information is not submitted. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer roof truss package applies to unit B only. The requested information is not submitted. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may follow. The requested information is not submitted. Verify the design of all drag trusses. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO # PFC- 5485). For units A & B. a) In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:l for wood shear panels. Table 23-ll-G. For example for second floor shear wall along grid line D.1. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes CI No 0 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 921 23; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. d Em Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 01/04/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4803 SET: I 0 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #1 / Bf44k’I.C bJd% PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A & B) 0 cl 0 w 0 IXI 0 la 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: 2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008 krnobcc has Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein CJaH-) Date [-tal (by: +) REMARKS: Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Fax #: (7a) 7t3- 5519 azz -tsJ Mail J Telephone/ Faxd In Person By: Kal Tumalieh Esgil Corporation Enclosures: - 0 GA 0 MB EJ c] PC 1212 1 I00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4803 01 /04/0 1 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4803 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #1 FLOOR AREA: (3337) Dwelling Garage( 636), Decks (97) Covered Entry (1 78) REMARKS: STORIES: Two HEIGHT: 26' - 6" (App. per UBC) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: I DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh A COMPLETED: 01 /04/01 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UD the recheck process. please note on this list (or a CORVI where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UD list when vou submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-4803 0 1 / 04/0 1 0 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industriaI projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). - 2. Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Section 106.3.3. Are the site block walls Dart of this Dermit if so then provide structural calculation and structural details. 3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION I N S P E CTI 0 N REMARKS 4. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 5. Please clarify the size and type of window # 22 at bedroom #I. Is a window or a door? 6. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. a) Rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Carlsbad 00-4803 01/04/01 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of % inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4.a) Provide 2 layers of 1/2" of type 'X" Gyp. Boards for TJI floor joists, per ICBO approval (NER 200) for TJI. 0 MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. STRUCTURAL The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) b) c) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Please clarify if the soil report is applicable to both Ms. Map lots 5 and 6. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. Specify the slab on grade thickness and reinforcement on plans per soil report. Specify the depth, width and reinforcement of foundation on foundation plan. Show all the required isolated concrete pads on foundation plan. For example at girder truss span. See calculation page IO. Show the design drag loads for all roof drag trusses. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer roof truss package applies to unit B only. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may follow. Carlsbad 00-4803 0 1 / 041 0 1 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 1 2 Cross-reference all calculations to plans. Please number all beams, to allow me to Correctly check structural calculations. For example show where beam (RBM-3) occurs on framing plans. Provide structural calculation for header 4x1 0 at master bedroom. Specify all required floor joists (TJI) depth and series on framing plans. Provide beam to beam connection detail. Specify the required hangers. For example connection of floor beam FB #I to FB# 2. Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section 2320.8.5. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1 . Show all required shear walls on plans. For example show the required second floor(roof ) shear walls along grid line ( 2 ). Please coordinate between structural calculations and plans. Verify the lenath of all shear walls shown on plans. Please coordinate between lengths shown on plans and lengths required by structural calculations. For example for second floor (roof) shear wall along grid line 1 for unit B. Provide lateral design for first floor along grid lines 3.1 & 4. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO # PFC- 5485). For units A & B. Specify the required A35 spacing for each shear walls type. See section (511 0). Specify the spacing for all stud walls on plans. CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35’s, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJl’s (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Truss-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. For gas piping under slabs that serve kitchen island cooktops, see Policy 91-46 for special sleeve and clean-out requirements. Carlsbad 00-4803 01/04/01 3 New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 4 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes c3 No 0 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-4803 01/04/01 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architectlengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineedarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. EwiWrlAnhked's Sd h SiiMure Here Signed I. List of work requiring special inspection: 0 Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI Prestressed Concrete 0 Structural Masonry 0 Designer Specified 0 Other 0 Field Welding 0 High Strength Bolting Expansion/Epoxy Anchors 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm@) responsible for the special inspections listed above: B. C. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. __ ~~ Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 00-4803 01 /04/0 1 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 291,33$ cb JURISDICTION : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4803 Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh DATE: 01/04/01 V BUILDING ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #1 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance BU l LDl NG OCCUPANCY: R-3/U- 1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN 7 Type of Review: El e Review 0 Structural Only 0 Other Hourly n Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $1.293.081 I $840.501 I $168.101 Comments: Plan Identical to plan Check 00-4799 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB I 03 BUILDING DDRESS: b-k. I/ ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: / 56 23 - EST. VALUE: *yo DATE: PROJECT DESCRl PTION: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: f specifications to this office for review. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORVATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT I Date: c, 74tr.A.. / /I \ f c Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-way Permit Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOAN NE JUCH N I EWI CZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet Carlsbad Tract: A-4 1 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST site plan drawn to scale. Show: F. H. Right-of-way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing or proposed sewer lateral Lines I. Existing or proposed water service G. Driveway widths asements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service A. Drainage Patterns I. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. ewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per -9 L- &Is- 5A'1wb(. A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industriaI buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2 Rev. 7/1uoO L BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3d DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE with the follow 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: ts-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2” x 11” plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to )he Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: \ ’ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public 2’ improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the .* 1 ST 0 0 2ND 0 0 0 0 3d 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. ’ Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector prior to occuDancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). / 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must be issued and rouqh qrading apDroval obtained Drior to issuance of a Buildinq Permit. yding Inspector sign off by: Date: Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 4 H:\WoRwxxs\cHKLsr\sU!M!q PI- Ckkl Fm (RIDDCE - HAURYEY 7-12-00).doc Rev. 00 ,- BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD 0 0 0 7d .No Grading Permit required. 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write “No Grading” on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 IO. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever J&.Jrs first, / &Required fees are attached TO t2 No fees required &d WATER METER REVIEW 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. 0 All single family dwelling units received “standard” 1” service with 5/8” service. 5 Rev. 711uW BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2 service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 0 0 0 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: I. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and obseive if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W. The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: 0 Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) 0 Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve 0 Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water . 1ST 2ND 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 0 0 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 0 0 0 13. Additional Comments: 7 Rev. 711uoO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET stimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. (yo5 L uad,h Bldg. Permit No. comf&O,? Y Address : Prepared by: 3 Date: $hT/m decked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: VR Sq. FtJUnits: EDU's: Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: SA Sq. FtJUnits: ADT's: I Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: FEES REQUIRED: ADT's: - WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) lad LRK-iN-LiEU FEE =$ I 7SS PARK AREA & #. Nwci_, EMNIT: 1755 X NO. UNITS: / 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT'dUNITS: / X FEE/ADT: 920 =$ 9020 / ADT's/UNITS: X FEElADT: =$ ,A+ fl BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 - DIST. #2- DIST. #3- UNIT/SQ.FT.: LEwER FEE EDU's: IT AREA: P+ EDU's: 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA F ACRES: / 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE, CONNECTION FEE X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: =$ .K X FEE/EDU: /?- =$ _/9,s7 X FEE/EDU: =$ ,F HIGH /LO w X FEEIAC: METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION WordlOo&MbfomaWw Cakuhtlon Worluhnt 1 of2 Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE -- TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: S $NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. Rev. 7/14/00 07/18/2001 07:lO FAX 760 438 4178 ENG. INSPECI'IONS ccryoFcARLsbAo ORADIN0 INsP~~c)IIECKUsT FOR PIRTUL Sm RELEASE f ROJECT INSPECTOR &*q E. DATE: $&'q ld,saO( PROJECT10 A5 00-05 . GRADINOPERMKW. LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: / a, 3- - NIA = NOT APPLICABLE 4 = COMPLETE 0 = INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE , 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. f. 0. 9. _I . ,- I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST ctrce \ * P Address \q05 bw\r& - - Plan Check No. CB q-03 9 9 s s APN: Type of Z3b-qt Project & Use: 5FR Planner Phone (760) 602-46Pj-T ?u\ Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: R General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: 1 Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: or non-residential development: Type of land used created by ) En# sg Legend: Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES PNO TYPE T\;\S a-05L APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE p?ndLyJ PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO )d If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO- Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES a NO - Data Entry Completed? YES (A/P/Ds,&tivity Maintenance,. enter CB#, (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. m Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing. topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Required a0 ' Interior Side: Required r Street Side: Required Rear: Required 17 Shown 20 Shown r Shown cc Shown 7 is(' 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Shown '--.Eront: Reauired Required Shown Shown Shown Rear: Required Structure separation: Required Shown Required 4070 Shown 3 2 70 3. 4. 5. Lot Coverage: Shown 8% ' I Required Height: Spaces Required (2,- Spaces Required Shown 3 Ccd Shown Par king : Guest OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER & DATE 2b/o,/ H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnc hkRevChklst PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 921 11 TELEPHONE (858) 560-1713, FAX (858) 560-0380 HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2541 State Street - Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008-1 964 June 1,2000 Work Order 400729 Attention : Mr. Bob Plein Subject: Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the 0.8 Acre Cynthia Lane Parcel, APN 156-230-41-00, in the City of Carlsbad, California References: See Appendix Gentlemen: Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.’s (PSE) geotechnical foundation evaluation for the 0.8 acre Cynthia Lane Parcel, APN 156-230-41-00, located in the City of Carlsbad, California. This work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated May 16, 2000 on the authorization of Mr. Bob Plein. The purpose of this investigation is to generally characterize site geotechnical condi- tions as they relate to the proposed construction of four (4) wood frame, residential structures supported by slab-on-grade foundation systems. 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK The following scope of work has been performed during PSE’s investigation. 0 0 0 Review of published maps and geologic literature. Mark-out and coordination of underground service alert. Excavation, logging and sampling of three (3) exploratory test pits, exca- vated with a John Deere 410E backhoe with 36 inch bucket (Table I). CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL: (714) 220-0770 TEL: (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL: (909) 676-8195 TEL: (714) 730-2122 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (714) 220-9589 FAX: (909) 676-1879 Work Order 400729 June I, 2000 Page 2 0 Laboratory testing and analyses of bulk samples consisting of: 1) hy- drometer analysis (Table 11); 2) remolded direct shears (Table II and . Plates B-1 and B-2); 3) compaction characteristics (Table 11); 4) expan- sion index (Table It); and 5) chemical/resistivity testing (Plates C-I through C-5). General discussion of site geology. 0 0 Limited seismic hazards analysis. 0 Preliminary grading recommendations. 0 Preliminary foundation design recommendations. 0 Preparation of this report and accompanying exhibits summarizing our findings, conclusions and recommendations. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The 0.8 vacant acre parcel is relatively flat with drainage by sheet flow to existing paved streets and associated storm drains. Currently the parcel supports a flower farming operation and existing homes are located to the east and west while Cynthia Lane and Buena Vista Avenue form the south and north bounda- ries. 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is assumed that mass grading techniques will be utilized to create building pads, driveways and improve surface drainages for support of four (4) residential structures. It is also understood that the proposed residential wood frame struc- tures will be supported by a slab-on-grade foundation system with shallow foun- dation elements. At this time, the foundation plans are not available for review; PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 3 therefore, the geotechnical design values presented herein are preliminary in nature. When complete, foundation plans should be reviewed for conformance to this report. 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Although no existing site specific proprietary geotechnical reports were available for PSE’s review, published data (Weber, 1982) indicates the site is underlain by terrace deposits of the Quaternary-age Lindavista Formation. Typically, the Lin- davista Formation consists of brown to reddish brown, silty to clayey sands. Weber indicates Santiago Formation cropping out three-quarters (3/4) of a mile northeast of the site at the Buena Vista Lagoon and it is likely that Santiago bed- rock underlies the site at depth. Review of the regional geologic information indicates the absence of faulting withidor in immediate proximity of the site. The trace of the Rose Canyon fault is located approximately eight (8) kilometers southwest of the parcel. Owing to the dense character of the Lindavista and underlying Santiago Formation, lique- faction potential is very low. Ground shaking from large seismic events gener- ated along offsite faults is possible, as with most areas in the seismically active southern California area. For structural design purposes, the parameters pre- sented in Table A should utilized for post-graded lots. The site occurs in seismic zone 4, and therefore the seismic zone factor ”Z” is 0.4. These parameters are meant to be consistent with UBC (1997). PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 4 TABLE A UBC (1 997) Seismic Parameters Soil Profile Type C, CV Na NV I sc 1 0.40N, 1 0.56NV I 1.0 I 1.1 1 Groundwater was not encountered at the time of PSE’s subsurface investigation. It is considered unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during grading op- erations or building construction. It is possible that landscape and/or seasonal rainwater will perch over the relatively dense, Lindavista Formation. Based on PSE’s general experience, the proposed three (3) foot cap is typically sufficient to allow for mitigation of nuisance water conditions. However, if perched condi- tions develop near finish grade surface, additional measures, such as the combi- nation of area drains and/or French drains, may be required. 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals As a general guideline, removals will likely be on the order of three (3) feet and should be accomplished over the entire site. Localized areas may require deeper removals and will depend upon conditions encountered during grading operations. Removal and recompaction should be accomplished for the three back- hoe trenches (TP-1 through TP-3) excavated for this study. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June I, 2000 Page 5 5.2 Existinq Site Improvements To the best of PSE's knowledge, existing underground improvements do not exist within the proposed building envelopes. Underground utility im- provements exist on the site along Cynthia Lane and Buena Vista Ave- nue. Additionally, residential structures exist on both sides of the subject lot. Given the proximity of the adjacent structures and improvements, care should be taken during grading operations. Accordingly, it should be the contractor's responsibility to protect adjacent improvements in these areas during grading and building construction. 5.3 Gradina ComDliance Grading should conform to the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad and the attendant PSE earthwork specifications. Field observations will be required during grading by qualified geotechnical personnel. This should include full time observation and testing of fill soil placement by field technician(s) and periodic observation by the soil engineer. 5.4 Site Preparation Prior to grading, the site must be stripped and cleared of existing vegeta- tion, trash, debris and other deleterious materials. These materials should be removed and wasted offsite. 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment Once removals are completed, the removal excavations should be mois- ture conditioned to optimum moisture or slightly above (ASTM:D 1557-91) and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, prior to placement of compacted fill. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 6 5.6 Compacted Fill Placement Fill should be spread in thin lifts (six to eight inches), the moisture content adjusted to a minimum of optimum moisture or slightly above, and the materials rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM:D 1557-91. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades are achieved. 5.7 Soil Material Suitabilitv Excavated materials, which are approved by the soil engineer, may be utilized in compacted fill provided that trash, vegetation and other delete- rious materials are removed prior to placement. 5.8 Soil Expansion Characteristics The onsite materials are considered to be low expansive in nature. Pre- liminary foundation designs are provided to accommodate this condition. However, as-graded expansive conditions should be confirmed upon completion of grading operations. 5.9 Import Soils Import soils, if needed, should have very low to low expansion properties. The soil engineer should be notified at least 48 hours in advance in order to sample, test and approve or disapprove materials from borrow sites. No import materials should be delivered for use on the site without prior approval by the soil engineer. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 7 5.10 Compaction Testing Fill should be tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the required compaction is achieved. 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA Laboratory testing indicates the existence of onsite materials that are low in ex- pansion potential. Final expansion potential determinations for the subject lots will be dependent on the post-graded soil conditions. For preliminary design purposes, the following conventional slab-on-grade foundation design parame- ters and recommendations are presented. Prior to construction, the foundation plans should be reviewed by PSE. At that time, finalized recommend at ionsko mments wil I be presented. 6.1 Preliminarv Foundation Desiqn Criteria Foundation systems may be preliminarily designed based upon the fol- lowing values. Allowable Bearing: 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Lateral Bearing: Sliding Coefficient: Settlement: 200 Ibs./sq.ft. at a depth of I2 inches plus 100 Ibs./sq.ft. for each additional 12 inches embedment to a maximum of 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. 0.35 Total = 314 inch Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet The above values may be increased as allowed by code to resist transient loading conditions, such as wind or seismic. PACIFIC SOILS ENOINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 8 6.2 6.3 P re1 i m i narv Conventional Sla b-0 n -G rade Foundation Svstems Conventional foundation systems may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with section 6.1 and Table B. Retaining Walls Foundations with retaining walls may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with recommendations of paragraph 6.1 and the following: 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Level Backfill Ka = 0.31 Kp = 3.25 KO = 0.47 Equivalent fluid pressures can be calculated utilizing a soil unit weight of y = 125 Ibs.lfL3. Other Design Considerations Retaining wall design should consider additional surcharge loads, where appropriate. Waterproofina and Drainaae Svstems Cantilever and/or restrained retaining walls should be waterproofed to accommodate the anticipated irrigation water and backfilled with free draining material (SE 2 30) to within 18 inches of grade and compacted to project specifications to minimize water marks. Na- tive soils shall be utilized in the upper 18 inches. Drainage PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 TABLE B CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS ExDansion Potential I Verv Low fo Low Soil Category I Footinq Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Finish Grade One-Story Interior I 12 inches One-Story Exterior Two-Story Interior Two-Stow Exterior 12 inches 12 inches 18 inches Footinq Width One-Story 12 inches Two-StOry 15 inches Footing Reinforcement One-Story No. 4 rebars, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom. beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as IL the structure.- Slab thickness, reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure. I PACIFIC SOILS ENOINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 'I, 2000 Page 9 6.3.4 systems including, as a minimum, a four (4) inch diameter perfo- rated drain line surrounded by three (3) cubic feet per lineal foot of three-quarters (314) inch to one (1) inch crushed rock wrapped with a suitable filter fabric, should be provided to all cantilever and re- strained retaining walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure. Other Appurtenances PSE can provide geotechnical design parameters and subsurface drainage recommendations for pools, spas, flatwork or other hard- scape improvements upon request. 7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Positive drainage away from structures shall be provided and maintained. Utility trench backfill shall be accomplished in accordance with the pre- vailing criteria of the City of Carlsbad. Seismic design should be based on current and applicable building code requirements. Soluble sulfate concentrations of the foundation material should be de- termined after grading is complete, when the final distribution of onsite material is known. Preliminary chemical analyses are presented on Plates C-I through C-5. These values should be reviewed by a corrosion engi- neer with respect to concrete specification and cathodic protection. PACIFIC SOILS ENQINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 10 The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the specific excavations and observations as noted. The materials immediately adja- cent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics and no rep- resentations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Respectfully. subm’ Dist: (6) Addressee \, CEW JAC/JAH:KFU0000 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 REFERENCES APPENDIX ICBO, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California: International Conference of Building Officials, 3 volumes. Weber, Harold F., 1982, Recent slope failures, ancient landslides and related geology of the north-central coastal area, San Diego County, California: California Divi- sion of Mines and Geology, open file report 82-12 LA. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. I UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDJRES MAJOR DIVISIONS CROUP SYMBOLS NRCAL NAMES I PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS CONSISTENCY CLASSIF I CATION GRANULAR SOIL COHESIVE SOIL BEDROCK hry bore Vsry loft Loore soft Moderately dense Firm Medium dense Stlff Dsm Vsry rhff Vary dense Hor d MOISTURE CONDITIOW PTHER SyMBoLs R- Undisturbed somple w Slightly moist B- Bulk mpk Moist P Groundwater wet Q Groundwoter seepoge Satumttd Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Work Order 400729 Date Excavated OW1 9/00 Excavated by CER Equipment John Deere 410E with 36 Bucket LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP- 1 0.0 - 8.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION(Q1v): brown to dark brown, silty, fine sand, slightly moist, moderately dense; common pinhole porosity; common rootlets. @ 1.5 ft. reddish brown to yellowish red, silty, fine to medium sand; trace of clay and coarse sand, moist, moderately to medium dense; massive; structured; structure faces stained with black splotches (magnesium oxide?); common pinhole porosity. @ 2.0 ft. dark reddish brown (5YR 314 to 4/4), clayey to silty. @ 4.0 ft. uncommon pinhole porosity. @ 7.0 ft. mottled dark reddish brown and yel- lowish red, silty, fine to medium sand, very moist, medium dense; massive; no structure. SM-SC SM TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS sc SM Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS DescriDtion TP-2 0.0 - 8.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION (Qlv): brown, silty, fine to medium sand, trace of coarse sand, moist to very moist; uncommon small rusty red sand clasts; massive; structured; structured surfaces stained black (magnesium oxide?). @ 1 .O ft. reddish brown to yellowish red, clayey, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, medium dense; common small rusty red sand clasts; massive; structured; structured surfaces stained black (magnesium oxide?). @ 6.0 ft. dark reddish brown, slightly silty, fine to coarse sand, slightly moist to moist, very dense; cemented; massive; no structure. TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENOINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-3 0.0 - 9.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION (Qlv): brown to dark brown, silty, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, moderately dense; common root- lets. @ 1.5 ft. brown to dark reddish brown, silty, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, moderately dense; common pin hole porosity; uncommon rootlets; massive. @ 3.0 ft. dark reddish brown, silty to clayey, fine to medium sand, very moist, medium dense; slightly cemented, slightly structured; slight pinhole porosity; some black staining on structured surfaces; very uncommon rootlets. @J 4.0 ft. dark reddish brown, clayey, fine to medium sand, very moist, medium dense; massive; no structure; no visible porosity. SM-SC sc TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% r Silty Sand "1 COHESION 0 psf. SM FRICTION ANGLE 33 degrees 4,000 symbol boring depth (R.) 0 TP-1 1 .o 3,750 symbol boring depth (R.) DIRECT SHEAR TEST 3,500 3,250 3,000 2,750 N 2,500 2,250 5 fn cn w E 2,000 9 1,750 1,500 r cn 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2 I ' PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715Convoy Court, S.D. CA92111 W .O. 400729 PLATE 6-1 (619) 560-1713 4,000 3,750 Clayey Sand sc-CL 3.500 COHESION 125 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 32 degrees 3,250 0 - 3,000 TP-2 3.0 DIRECT SHEAR TEST I PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 771 5 Convoy Court, S.D. CA 921 11 W.O. 400729 PLATE 8-2 (619) 560-1713 2,750 cu 2,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 DI RECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% NORMAL STRESS Ibs./ft 2 -symbol I boring I depth (R.) I symbol I boring I depth (ft.) I M 002 05/31/00 WED 13: 54 FAX 9093701046 +++ PSEI-SD c Del MarAnalytical Pacifc Soils Engineering. Inc. Client Project TI): 400729 7715 Convo Court San Diego, &4 921 11 Attention: Ron Budclcy Sampled: 05/25/00 Received: 05/26/00 Report Numbcr: CEO332 Analyte INORGANICS Reporting Sampk Dilution Date bate Dnts Method Batch Limit Rrsult Factor Exttnctcd Analyzed Qualifiers pH Units pH Units Sample ID: CJE033u)l (TP-I@I' - Soil) pn EPA9045C COE261S NA 4.66 1 5l26fOO 5/26/00 Sample ID: CJE.0332-02 (TP-2@.3' - Soil) PH EPA9045C COE2615 NA 6.91 1 5l26/00 5/26/00 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager Plate C-1 +++ r3ti-w LgJ vu3 05/31/00 WED 13:55 FAX 9093701046 < Del MarAnalytical 2852 Allon Avo.. Irdne, CIA92606 (We) 281.1022 FAX (919) 261-1228 1014 E Coaiey Or, sum A. COIVHI. C~9232r (909,3ro-r667 Fnx igoei 370-106 16525 Snarmen Way, SUllb C-11 VWI Nuyz. CA 9POG (ale) 779-1814 FAX (818) 779.1863 BdEC Cha:oFoaKo Dr, Sui10 805. Son Dleao. CA 92123 9@30 Sah 5131 SL, Suile 8-120. Phoenlx. AZ OSOU (8181 505-9596 FAX (G19) 505-9689 (480) 78;.0048 FAX (480) 7850851 Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. Client Project ID: 400729 7715 Convoy Court San Dicgo, CA 921 11 Sampled: 05/25/00 Received: 05/26/00 Report Numbcr: CJE0332 I' Attation: Ron Buckley Anrlyte XNORGANICS Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Data Method Batdi Limit Result Factor Extmded Analyzed Qualifiers mg/kg Wkg Sample ID: CJEO332-01 (TP-I@l' - Soil) Chloride l?PA 300.0 IOE30:!2 5.0 8.1 1 5l30fOO 5/30/00 ohmslcm ohmdcm Sample ID: CJE0332-01 (TP-lel' - Soil) Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOE3037 700 2200 1 5/30100 5/30/00 YO ?4 Sample ID: CJE0332-01 (TP-lal' - Soil) Soluble Sulfate U'A 300.0 I0WO:I 0.00050 0.0070 I 5130100 5/30/00 mg/& ms'kg Sample ID: CJEO332-02 (TP-2@3' - Soil) Chloride EPA300.0 10E30::2 5.0 9.9 1 5/30100 5I30JOO ohmslcm ohmdcm Sample ID: CJEO332-02 (TP-2@3' - Soil) RLsistivity €PA 120.1 MOD. IOE30:.7 700 5400 I 5130fOO 5/3OJOO *?lo YO Samplc ID: CJE0332-02 ("-2e3' - Soil) Soluble Sulfate EPA 300.0 IOE30::2 0.00050 0.0060 1 5/30/00 5/30/00 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager Plate C-2 c Del MarAnalytical 2852 AllOn AW.. hVine.. CA 92(KIC (-1 261-1022 FAX (049) 261-1228 1014 E Cooley Dr, Sula A, Coltan. CA92324 ie5z Shermm w.>y. Sulfa C-11, Van Nu-. CA 82408 8.330 Souin 51s SI.. Suns B-120. Phaunix, &2 YW [90w 3704687 FAX (gas) 370.10~6 (Ole] 779.1844 FAX (818) 779-1843 (480) 785.00~3 FAX (480) 785-0851 918d ChwapJake Dr.. SUI19 805, SSn DIS~O. CA 92123 (619) 505.9596 FAX (670) 505-9C89 Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. 7715 Convo Court San Diego, C?P, 921 11 Attention: Ron Budcley I Client Projcd 11): 400723 Report Ntmbtrr. CEO3 32 Sampled: 05/25/00 Received: 05/26/00 Analyte INORGANICS Reporting Spike Sourn %REC RPD Dab Result Limit Units Level Rault %REC LlmiO RPD Limit Qualifiers Batch: COE2605 Extracted: 05/26/00 Duplicate AnrlyzfA: OSR6/00 (COEZG05-DUPl) PH 4.46 NA p3 Units 4.66 4.39 5 Source: CJEO332-01 Plate C-3 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager IVw rcwlrrpcrrun on& to rhesamplu k.Wd in rh Iahrorory Thrr rprr .iliall nor bc rtpmducul, mcpI111 full, wchorr wiranper IIISXW~J+I~ Del Mar halyrcol. CJEO332 < 4 01 8 < Del MarAnalytical 7 Sampkd: 05/25/00 Report Nurnbcr: CJE0332 Received: 05/26/00 Ssn Diego, CA 921 11 Attention: Ron Buckley 2852 Aibn Avu.. Imne Ch 9260C (9d9) ZC1.1022 FAX (909) 2Cl.12e8 IO14 E Cooley Dr,. 6uls A, Colton, CAW24 18525 Sherman Way. SU~IE C11, wn Nuye CA 82406 (008) 370-4667 FAX (WQI 370.1046 (618) 77B.iBM FAX (Bi6) 778.18~3 9dEd Chwspsske Of. Sulk3 8m. SSn OiBgO CA921W 9830 %uh!j151 a,, Sullcr R120. Phwnlr. A2 &OM (819) 505.9596 FAX (619) 505-9889 (LBO) 18’,.0063 FAX (WCI ?&Of61 Annlyte INOILGANICS RPD Data Reporting Spike Source %REC ResuJt Limit Ilnits Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifiers Batch: lOE3022 Extracted: 05/30/00 Blank Annlyzcd: 05/30/00 (IOW022-BL1Cl) Chloride ND 5.0 mdks Soluble Sulfuk ND 0.00050 x LCS Analyzed: 05/30/00 (lOE3022-BS1) Chloride 47.6 5.0 mgkg 50.0 95.2 90-110 Soluble Sulk 0.00957 0.00050 % 0.0100 95.7 90-110 Matrix Spike Analyzed: OSnO/OO (IOE3022-MSI) Chloride 54.3 5.0 m@kg 50.0 8.1 92.4 80-120 Soluble SulfnL 0.0163 0.00050 ‘!4 0.0100 0.0070 93.0 SO-120 Mntrix Spike Dup Analyzed: 05/30/00 (IOE3022-MSDl) Chloridc 55.9 5 .O mgkg 50.0 8.1 95.6 80-120 2.90 20 Batch: 1033037 Extracted: 05/30/00 Duplicate Annlyzcd: 05/30/00 (IOE3037-DUPl) Resistivity 2200 100 c hmslcm 2200 0 za Source: CJE0332-01 Source: CJE0332-01 Soluble Sulfuk 0.0167 0.00050 % 0.0100 0.0070 97.0 SO-120 2A2 20 Source: CJ 60332-0 1 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager Plate C-4 < Del MarAnalytical 2852 Allon Awe.. Iwno. CA 926-26 1014 E Cooley Dr,. SUI18 A. Conon, CAB2324 16525 snerman way sulie C-ii ban NU~B. CA woe 9484 Che88peake Or. Sulk 805. S5n 01Uga. CA 92123 9850 South 51~1 SI, SuiLc 8.120, Phaonix. Az BW (W91261-1022 FAX (W) 261.1228 (PO9) 970-6667 FAX (BOe) 370-1066 (818) 77ww FU (818) 774.184 (C19) 505-959t FAX (C19) 505.9593 (680) 7@SCQ4!3 FAX (490) 785-0651 Pncifi Soils Engineering, Xnc. 7715 Convo Court San Diego, EA921 11 Attention: Ron Buckley I Client Project 11): 400729 wort Nurnbcr: CJE0332 Sampled: 05/25/00 Received: 05/26/00 DATA QUALIFIERS AND DEFINITIONS ND NR Notreported. RF’D Relative Percent Difhencc AnalyteNOT DETECED at or above the reponing limit or MDL, if MDL is specifed. Del Mar Analytical, Colton Project Mmnger Jc?anne Shoulder Plate C-5 7hr rarulhpcrtuu fink forhcsomplct kued lntholuborocory. 7h.s rrparr thullnof bcrcpwhctd. ucrpl :ti juU. wrrliour wrrurnpr ~mr~swn~rrm Dcl Mar Annlyicul. UE0332c 6 of 6> - i ti I Id I I PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS These specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements for the development of the project. These specifications shall be the project guidelines for earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling agency. I. GENERAL A. The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. B. The project Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall provide testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. C. All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be accomplished by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. D. It is the Contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fills to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil Engineer. The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil Engineer to be unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill. E. The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills. II. SITE PREPARATION A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials determined by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted fills shall be removed and wasted from the site. Where applicable, the Contractor may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for the project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in designated areas onsite. After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as recommended by the Soil EngineerEngineering Geologist. PACIFIC SOILS ENOINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 2 B. Mer the removals as delineated in Item 11, A above, the exposed surfaces shall be disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. The prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture condition, mixed as required, and compacted and tested as specified. In areas where it is necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to placing fill, it will be the contractor's responsibility to notify the proper authorities. C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer and/or the controlling agency for the project. III. COMPACTED FILLS A. B. C. D. E. Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill, provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer. Deleterious material not disposed of during clearing or demolition shall be removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer. Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer. Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken offsite, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. All fills, including onsite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved prior to importation, The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compacted shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture condition and a uniform blend of materials. All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction cannot be attained. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 3 F. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below the limit specified by the Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blended until a uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved. Where the moisture content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the limits specified. G. Each fill layer shall be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer. In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer to the contrary, the compaction standard shall be ASTM:D 1557-9 1. H. Where a slope receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to one-vertical, the fill shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer. I. Side hill fills shall have a minimum key width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil Engineer in the field. J. Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist. K. The contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization fills as directed by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing agency for the project. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure which produces the designated result. L. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or creep material into rock or firm material; and the transition shall be stripped of all soil or unsuitable materials prior to placing fill. The cut portion should be made and evaluated by the Engineering Geologist prior to placement of fill above. M. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer. Finished surfaces of these pads may require scarification and recompaction. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 4 Tv. CUTSLOPES A. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes and shall be notified by the Contractor when cut slopes are started. B. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to treat these problems. C. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face the same direction as the prevailing drainage. D. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. E. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, andor in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer or Engineering Geologist. V. GRADING CONTROL A. Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer and/or his representative during the progress of grading. Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to evaluate the compaction and moisture compliance of each layer of fill. Density tests shall be performed at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative. B. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed over an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Where the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture content and density of the fill are within the limits previously specified. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 5 D. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded area until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. E. Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling and compacting operations in order that he will be able to state in his opinion all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved specifications. F. After completion of grading and after the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be submitted. No hrther excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior notification of the Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist. IV. SLOPE PROTECTION All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted and/or protected from erosion in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL 7- TYPE A /NATURAL GRUJND SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "A"(PLATE t-2) NOTE. FINAL 20' OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED L - TYPE 8 ,-------------------------- #* PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL 0 /= \ / COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM (REMOVE) TYPICAL BENCHING SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE "B"(PLdTE G-2) NOTE:FINAL ZO'OFPIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED PLATE G-/ PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. w 0. DATE CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS ALTERNATE I PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL 3 6 IN YIN. FILTER YATERIAL:YIN.YDL. W9m. /LIN. FT. * :.. .. .I 6 IN. 0 ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED 12 1 SUBSTITUTE WITH YIN. 8 PERF,1/4 IN .. 6 IN PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOTTOM HALF YIN. PIPE. ASTM 02751, SDR 35 OR ASTM 03034, SDR35 OR 8-1 *STY D1527. SCHD.40 A STY 01765, SCHD. 4 0 A-l FOR CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF 500 FEET USE 8 IN. 0 PIPE ALTERNATE 2 NLTER MATERIAL WRAPPED IN FABRIC 6 IN. YIN OVERLAP I IN MAX GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC 6 IN. MIN. ovEaL4 P .. 3 I tK YAX.GRAVEL OR APPROVED EOUIVAL ENT 9 FT. /F T UIRAFI 140 FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EOUIVAL ENT (TYPICAL) A-2 PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE NATIVE BACKFILL AFI 140 FILTER FABRIC OR PF)OVED EOUIVAL EN7 I IN MAX OPEN GRADEV GRAVEL OR APPROVED EOUIVAL ENT LETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINAL FOR ALTERNATES A2 AND 82' M NON-PERF PERF 6 IN. 6 IN.dYIN gYIN PIPE ALTERNATE 3 6 IN.MIN OVER1 A P PERFORATED PIPE SURROUNDED 6 WITH NLTE R MATERIAL 0 6 IN YIN COVER 4 IN MlN BEDDI PERFORATED PIPE 6 IN fl YIN FILTER MATERIAL SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING I IN. too 3/4 IN. 90-100 3/8 IN. 40-100 NO. 4 25 -40 PLATE G-2 DATE NO. 8 I8 -3s PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING INC, NO. 50 0-7 w. 0. N0.30 3-15 NO. PO0 0 -3 - c, 0 C 0 c, 0 w I I 4 c I 2 8 2 i I I cut Lot --- /I Cut-Fill Lot (Transition) 0 - 0 .,I , I LOverexcovote ond Recompoct I '- \be'-/ I Unweothered Bedrock *e>/ e deeper overexcovotion moy be required by the soils engineer in steep cut -f ill tronsition areas PAC1 Fl C SO1 LS ENGINEERING, IN C. 1 W. 0. DATE I PLATE G-4- 4/ w c 0 0 Q, 0 t t 0 t 0 c a .- 0 t 0" F &: F I I=, I I I I Selective Grading Detail for Stabilization Fill Unstable Material Exoosed in Portion of Cut Slope ished Ground mt Unweathered Bedrock ~llll~lllt ll,l,lu&5;::Y;&\ or opproved material . ...I >,. $w **\- If recommended by the soils engineer/ eologist, the remaining cut portion of the slope may require r!moval and replacement pbw . -/ --I/ with compocred fill (See blotc G-3) NOTE: I. 2. Subdroins are not required unless specified. "W" shall be equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For Slopes greoter thon 25fm *W"sholl be determined by the project soils engineer/geologist. At no time shall "W" be less than H/2. PLATE G-7 PACIFIC SOJLS ENGINEERING, JNC. H! 0. DATE I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 rJ 1 1 1 c ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL PLATE G-IO PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC w. 0. DATE FINISH GRADE CLEAR AREA FOR FOUNDATIONS, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS. FINISH SLOPE FACE e a3 \ NOTE: IF NECESSARY, OVERSIZED MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE 15 FOOT ZONE WITH SPECIAL EOUlPMENT,SUCH AS A ROCK RAKfPRlOR TO PLACING THE NEXT FILL LIFT. TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (END VIEW) HORIZONTALLY PLACE D COMPACT€ D FILL GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED TOFILL VOIDS NOTt5:COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE BROUGHT lP AT A HIGHER ELEVATION ALONG WINDROW SOGRANULAR SOIL CAN BEFLOODED INA "TRENCH CONDITION". PROFILE VIEW I u 4 - City of Carlsbad CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. ThLCity will notjsye,any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: / "3 Plan Check Number: c q& -3 Building Permit Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Number of New Dwellinq Units 7357 J)G- r Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling / Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/lndustrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: Date: 6/3/d/ , r I h TS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 2 15 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) San Dieguito Union High School District 7 10 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Certification of ApplicanVOwners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf o the Owner. Signature: kL Date: ---A>h i . 1635 Faraday Avenue ! Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-2700 FAX (760) 602-8560 @ Revised 4/20/00 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) **********+************+**~******~*****~********************~*****+***~***~***********************~ THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the devetoper, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may isme building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE Car1sb-A Un;fte.’ Scbcal District NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OQu‘d I fqiprue I, DATE C? 11 5113 d, Csl i lorn i a 92008 PHONE NUMBER