The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1415 BUENA VISTA WAY; ; CB004804; PermitI City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 07/18/2001 Residential Permit Permit No:CB004804 Job Address: Permit Type: RESDNTL SubType: SFD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: Lot #: 0 Applied: 12/19/2000 Valuation: $291,339.50 Construction Type: VN Entered By: JM Occupancy Group: 6 Reference #: Plan Approved: 07/18/2001 # Dwelling Units: 1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 07/18/2001 Bedrooms: 5 Bathrooms: 4 Inspect Area: Project Title: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Orig PC#: 1415 BUENA VISTA WY CBAD SFD 3337 SF,GAR 636 SF,DK 97 SF, COV ENTRY 178 SFPlan Check#: Applicant: PLEIN BOB Owner: 202 2541 STATE STREET 5008 07/18/01 0002 Of 02 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CGP 25552 09 760-729-7964 Total Fees: $26,392.59 Total Payments To Date: $840.50 Balance Due: $25,552.09 Building Permit $1,293.08 Meter Size Add'l Buildina Permit Fee $0.00 Add'l Recl. Water Con. Fee $0.00 - Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Recl. Water Con. Fee $840.50 $0.00 $0.00 $29.13 $1,755.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 a.00 $2,400.00 $0.00 $O*w DSt8 Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Tfaffic Impact Fee Traffsc Impact (CFD Fund) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fw Housing InLIeu Fee Master Drainage Fee: Sewer Fee: Additional fees: TOTAL PERMIT FEES $80.00 $1,871 .OO $0.00 $6,302.38 $4,894.50 $0.00 $0.00 $432.00 $488.00 $0.00 $210.00 $60.00 $70.00 $0.00 $431 5.00 $0.00 $1,959.00 $1 93.00 $26,392.59 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: &&k&C..dnL Date: 6b!/ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter cdlectively referred to as "feeslexactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these feeslexactions. H you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely fdbw that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your mht b protest the specified feedexactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection feas and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar appliin processing or service fees in connection with this proiect NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which YOU have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which Ihe staMe of limitations has prevbuslv othennrise expired. 2 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 22::- L il2. .- : . J: -- - @e;p / 3+q 5" + W-OS hb i = L, Total # of units Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number UnitNo, . Phase No. \CL.-13iQ --\ \1km+- \k&Q Name Address - . #of Stories CS. brrk cc- city - # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Statelzip Telephone # Fax Name (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged five hundred dollars I15001). Ib - YW- -3L\ Name Address City StateKip - - _Telephone # Designer Name Address City Statenip Telephone State License # 0 of the work for which this permit is issued. issued. My worker's ompensation insurance carrier and policy number are: (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$lo01 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit IS issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100.000). In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. I have and will maintain e certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is Insurancecompany b-4 % c))ht~ Policy No. 39°0005--'L -O0 Expiration Date \Q(\10\ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 1. 2. 3. 4. number / contractors license number): 5. I am exempt under Section I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES UNO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address I phone number /type Business and Professions Code for this reason: of work): Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? c] YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. LENDER'S NAME LENDERS ADDRESS City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION. Evely permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit IS suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced Sectton 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I 7 DATE 2/t g/.l. cJ~ WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Clar of CarlsbrQ Flnal Bulldlug Inspaction Dept: Building Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Date: Permit #: CB004804 Permit Type: RESDNTL Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SubType: SFD Address: 1415 BUENA VISTA WY Lot: 0 Contact Person: JOHN LEE Phone: 76041 97879 Sewer Dst Water Dist: SFD 3337 SF,GAR 636 SF,DK 97 SF, COV ENTRY 178 S .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected Date By:&z?&,/ 1 /74- TE 9 Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected: (/1</2 Approved: /Disapproved: Inspected Date By: inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: .....,,..,,,...,........11...11..........~. .............................................................................................................. 1 Inspection List Permit#: CB004804 Type: RESDNTL SFD NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SFD 3337 SF,GAR 636 SF,DK 97 SF, COV -______. Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 06/07/2002 89 06/07/2002 89 06/06/2002 89 06/06/2002 89 0511 312002 39 0511 012002 39 12/19/2001 22 12/10/2001 18 12/03/2001 16 11/28/2001 14 11/27/2001 14 11/26/2001 14 10/18/2001 13 1011 712001 13 1011 71200 I 15 10/10/2001 83 0811 512001 1 1 0811 5/2001 12 0811 312001 1 1 0811 0/2001 12 08/08/2001 21 08/07/2001 22 08/02/2001 22 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Electrical Final Electrical Sewerwater Service Exterior LatWDrywall Insulation FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldin FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldin FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldin Shear PanelsMD's Shear PanelslHD's RoofIReroof Roof SheathinglExt Shear FtgIFoundationlPiers SteelIBond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers SteellBond Beam UndergroundUnder Floor Sewerwater Service Sewerwater Service RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB RCB AP RI RI CA co NR AP AP AP AP NR CA AP CP AP NR AP AP co NR AP NR AP FINAL - ALL THREE SIGNATURES ARE ON CARD - GMR PM INSP PLEASE LATE PM HOMEOWNER COMPLAINT EMR BY RCB - FOR WORKING TILL 9PM ARRIVED AT 2:20PM - NOBODY ON SITE OK TO WRAP 2" AND 12" SHEAR NAILING 2ND FLR FONT AND BACK OK TO COVER NO SUPER ON JOB MISSING DOWELS AND TIES Monday, June 10,2002 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/07/2002 Permit## CBOO4804 Inspector Assignment: RCB Title: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Description: SFD 3337 SF,GAR 636 SF,DK 97 SF, COV ENTRY 178 SF Type: RESDNTL SubType: SFD Job Address: Location: 1415 BUENA VISTA W Suite: Lot 0 APPLICANT PLEIN BOB Owner: PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT Remarks: PM INSP PLEASE Total Time: Phone: 76041 97879 Inspector: Requested By: JOHN Entered By: ROBIN CD Description Act Comments 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCRS Date 06/06/2002 05/13/2002 05/10/2002 12/19/200l 1 2/1 0/2001 12/03/2001 I 1/28/2001 11/27/2001 11/26/2001 loll 8/2001 loll 712001 1011 7/2001 1011 0/2001 08/15/2001 08/15/2001 08/13/2001 InsDection History Description Act 89 Final Combo CA 39 Final Electrical co 39 Final Electrical NR 22 SeweriWater Service AP 18 Exterior LathlDrywall AP 16 Insulation AP 14 Frame/SteeUBolting/Welding AP 14 Frame/SteeUBolting/Welding NR 14 Frame/SteeUBolting/Welding CA 13 Shear PaneMHD's AP 13 Shear PaneWHD's CP 15 RoofIReroof AP 83 Roof SheathinglExt Shear NR 1 I FtglFoundatiodPiers AP 12 SteellBond Beam AP 11 FtglFoundationlPiers co lnsp Comments RC EMR RC RC RC RC RC RC RC OKTOWRAP RC RC OKTOCOVER RC NO SUPER ON JOB RC RC RC MISSING DOWELS AND TIES RC BY RCB - FOR WORKING TILL 9PM HOMEOWNER COMPLAINT RC ARRIVED AT 2:20PM - NOBODY ON SITE 2" AND 12" SHEAR NAILING 2ND FLR FONT AND BACK I. UNSCHEDULED BUILDING ,TNSPECTION INSPECTOR &&3 PLAN CHECK # DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRTPnON ACT COMMENTS -4 EsGil - Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 5/25/01 JURI SDl CTION: Carlsbad 0 APPLICANT co-a PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4804 SET: IV 0 FILE 9 PLANREVIEWER PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-06 parcel 3 PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A & B) 0 0 0 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: 1 Telephone #: Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Acoordinate to John at the City beadeferredsubmittal. 4 By: KalTumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA 0 MB EJ PC LOG \ tmsmU.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 CrP EsGil - Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 5/ 14/01 JURI SDl CTI ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4804 SET: I11 PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-06 parcel 3 0 APPLICANT 0 PLAN REVIEWER PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A & B) 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. Hermosa Homes 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: 0 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein Date contacted:SI /Y /Or (by: ("A/\) Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Fax #: (760) BQ-5644 729.6sr.f, MailMlephone Fa/ In Person 0 REMARKS: By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA MB 0 EJ 0 PC LOG tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4804 5/14/01 NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGii Corporation is complete. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industriaI projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 18. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. The requested information is not submitted. Please submit two sets of revised manufacturer roof truss drawings for building elevations A and 6. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No 0 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 8581560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. t r, - Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 03/08/01 J U Rl SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4804 SET: In n FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map 900-06 parcel 3 PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A & B) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. Hermosa Homes 2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to fotward to the applicant 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein Date contacted: 5 1 %/O I (by-) Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Fax #: (760) 729-53VI Mail AephoneH Fad In Person -(q 0 REMARKS: By: KalTumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB [7 EJ 0 PC 02/27/01 tmmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego,California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 I Carlsbad 00-4804 03/ 08/0 1 NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 0 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustriaI projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. I. 2 2 3. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). The requested information is not submitted. Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Section 106.3.3. Are the site block walls Dart of this Permit if so then provide structural calculation and structural details. The reauested information is not submitted. Is the site block walls Dart of this Dermit 3 ves or no. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION The requested information is not submitted. . Carlsbad 00-4804 03/08/01 0. 9. 12. 18. 10. 19. 30. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks. The requested information is not submitted. Please provide detail and cross reference to plans. See attached detail MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Sheet 17 is not found. 0 STRUCTURAL Please clarify if the soil report is applicable to both Master Map. Lots 5 and 6. Yes or No. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. The requested information is not submitted. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer roof truss package applies to unit B only. The requested information is not submitted. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may follow. The requested information is not submitted. Verify the design of all drag trusses. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO # PFC- 5485). For units A & B. a) In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:l for wood shear panels. Table 2341-6. For example for second floor shear wall along grid line D.1. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No 0 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ’ I __I Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 01/04/01 JURI S D I CTI ON: Carlsbad &%%@y 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4804 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #2 /4 / 3- -@ bk PROJECT NAME: Pacific View Homes (Plan A 8a B) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes with the jurisdiction's building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. \ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. 2541 State St. Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA 92008 c] The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ktmo3rc. k-q Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check bagbeen completed. a Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Plein (v*k.) Date a=?- 8-ai (by: b) Telephone #: (760) 729-7964 Fax #: 1.766) 'I&-- SSI+ Mail Telephone Fa* In Person REMARKS: By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 1 212 1100 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-4804 01 / 04/0 1 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PROJECT ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #2 FLOOR AREA: (3337) Dwelling Garage( 636), Decks (97) Covered Entry (178) STORIES: Two HEIGHT: 26' - 6" (App. per UBC) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY J U RI SDI CTI ON : DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh COMPLETED: 01/04/01 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/21/00 FOREWORD .@LEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following mobekcodes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To meed UD the recheck Drocess, please note on this list (or a CODV) where each correction item has been addressed, Le.. Dlan sheet number, sDecification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UD list when vou submit the revised Dlans. ! I Carlsbad 00-4804 01/04/01 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industriaI projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). - 2. Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included." Section 106.3.3. Are the site block walls Dart of this permit if so then provide structural calculation and structural details. 3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. ** In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked itev yill also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION REMARKS 4. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 5. Please clarify the size and type of window # 22 at bedroom #I. Is a window or a door? 6. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. a) Rise may be 8 maximum and run 9" minimum. ! , Carlsbad 00-4804 0 1 /04/01 7. 8. 9. IO. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of '!A inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3. Show drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. At decks. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4.a) Provide 2 layers of 112" of type 'X" Gyp. Boards for TJI floor joists, per ICBO approval (NER 200) for TJI. 0 MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. 0 STRUCTURAL The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: -a) E The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Please clarify if the soil report is applicable to both Ms. Map lots 5 and 6. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. Specify the slab on grade thickness and reinforcement on plqnsper soil report. Specify the depth, width and reinforcement of foundation on foundation plan. Show all the required isolated concrete pads on foundation plan. For example at girder truss span. See calculation page IO. Show the design drag loads for all roof drag trusses. Justify the dead load used in design of roof trusses top chords. Provide truss layout for unit A. It appears that the layout shown on manufacturer roof truss package applies to unit B only. Project engineer of record to review manufacturer roof truss drawings. To verify that all drag roof trusses have be design adequately. Additional corrections may follow. Carlsbad 00-4804 01/04/01 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 1 2 Cross-reference all calculations to plans. Please number all beams, to allow me to Correctly check structural calculations. For example show where beam (RBM-3) occurs on framing plans. Provide structural calculation for header 4x1 0 at master bedroom. Specify all required floor joists (TJI) depth and series on framing plans. Provide beam to beam connection detail. Specify the required hangers. For example connection of floor beam FB #I to FB# 2. Bearing partitions, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, beams, walls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section 2320.8.5. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1 630.1 .I . Show all required shear walls on plans. For example show the required second floor(roof ) shear walls along grid line ( 2 ). Please coordinate between stnktural calculations and plans. Verify the lenath of all shear walls shown on plans. Please coordinate between lengths shown on plans and lengths required by structural calculations. For example for second floor (roof) shear wall along grid line 1 for unit B. Provide lateral design for first floor along grid lines 3.1 & 4. Omit Simpson strong wall at second floor (roof) along grid line ( D ). Simpson strong walls are not approved for on raised floors per (ICBO ff PFC- 5485). For units A & B. rl Specify the required A35 spacing for each shear walls type. See section (511 0). Specify the spacing for all stud walls on plans. CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Nails for shear transfer connection (using A3534 etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJl’s (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Truss-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. For gas piping under slabs that serve kitchen island cooktops, see Policy 91-46 for special sleeve and clean-out requirements. Carlsbad 00-4804 01 /04/01 3 New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 4 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No 0 - -_ - The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-4804 0 1 /04/0 1 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER’S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architectlengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 .l for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. EngWslAnWectsSeal h Sbnrtur Hen Signed I. Listof Gork requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI 0 Prestressed Concrete 0 Structural Masonry 0 Designer Specified Other 0 Field Welding 0 High Strength Bolting 0 Expansion/Epoxy Anchors 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing 2. Name@) of individual@) or firm@) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. C. 3. A. 8. C. kr Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 00-4804 01 / 041 0 1 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-4804 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh DATE: 01/04/01 291,339 BUILDING ADDRESS: MS. Map #OO-05 Parcel #2 BUILDING OCCUPANC?: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN I I I I I I I Jurisdiction Code I cb I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I I I Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I I Type of Review: El- 0 Other I $1,293.081 I $840.501 Structural Only [7 Hourly I I Hour(s)' Esgtl Plan Review Fee ~ ~~ ~~ ~ Comments: Plan Identical to plan Check 00-4799 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc I BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB ‘jfoq BUILDING *41 DDRESS: sB-I/n)m bilziA/ DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: /56 -1330 -Y/ EST. VALUE: r c ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been ed report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, e necessary corrections to plans for compliance with applicable information and/or specifications provided in your Submit corrected plans and/or submittal: therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. ffice for review. Date: / /dB / A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Date: {wO/ Date: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ Dedrcation Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Rightsf-Way Permit Application Right-of-way Pennit Submittal Checklist and Infomation Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ~~ ~ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: I BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST - SIT LAN W Provide a fully dimensioned site A. NorthArrow B. Existing & Proposed Structures C. Existing Street Improvements D. Property Lines /' A. 6. C. plan drawn to scale. Show: F. Right-of-way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral 1. Existing or proposed water service J. Existing or proposed irrigation service Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For comrnercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, indude: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2 m~. 7n4m BUlLDlNG PLANCHECK CHECKLIST is^ ~ND 3d DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE with the follow a 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: ON REQUIREMENTS \/\A// to the building site and any storm required for all new buildings and $15.000, pursuant to Carlsbad - Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent in or utility easements on the building site is remodels with a value at or exceeding ~~ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner@) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to .the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad . Municipat Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $= so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please retum agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d.No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective imixovements found adiacent to buildina site must be reDaired to the satisfaction of the Citv lnsmctor Drior to OccuDanCy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 0 0 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading / requirements. lndude accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Gradina Permit must be issued and rough qradinq armroval obtained Drior to issuance of a Euildina Permit. Inspector sign off by: Date: Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 4 P BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD 0 0 c] 7d ,No Grading Permit required. 0 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write 'No Grading' on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: c] 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 0 10.NPDESPERMlT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shali provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever fees are attached mLe &d- P No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 0 12a. Domestic(potab1e)Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. 0 All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. 8 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST I 0 If owner/developer proposes a size other than the 'standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the 'meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. 0 Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. 0 If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 0 12b. Irrigation Use (where recyded water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and obseive if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a Circled 'I", and potable water is typically a circled *W. The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line . Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivisiordproject are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water I 1- 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 2NO 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 0 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 0 0 0 13. AddRionalComments: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET timate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. &A w Bldg. Permit No. c(3 mq 6of 7 Address: Prepared by: -m Date:' LL/&?$ /Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: ( Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: / Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: ADT's: - FEES REQUIRED: LK-t N-Lt EU FEE WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) d FEEIUNIT: I 7 ss X NO. UNITS: =$ (755 AAFFiC IMPACT FEE PARK AREA & #: -@v(l) ADT'sIUNITS: / X FEEIADT: =$ y&o 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 - DIST. #2 - DIST. #3 - ADT'sIUNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ pi P F 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: / UNIT/SCl. FT .: X FEE/SQ.FT.IUNIT: -8 ,& FEE X FEE/EDU: /99 =$ I%9 X FEE/EDU: =$ p:::R+ EDU's: fl /r8t.. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ /@ w. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA HIGH /LOW ATTB: WATER FEES X FEEIAC: =$&#&yy4 UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION NaD Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ SNOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. , ,/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVEEW CHECKLIST p-e\ a Plan Check No. CB Planner mg r isner?cuA\ 6dtor Phone (760) 602-46M 23 ' APN: \5 b-230 -4\ Type of Project & Use: 5FE Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: E-\ General Plan: Facilities Management Zone: 1 CFD lin/niitl # Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: qbo '1 Address \q\b Buzw\s \E\$ +a LJV Circle One - ss s s s il i! 0 (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: 1 Legend: Item Complete 0 Item incomplete - Needs your action TYPE - NO Environmental Review Required: YES - DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO - TYPE ms 00 -0% PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 3 APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE pmdI r? ~ ~~ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES - NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO . If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determinatidn Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: - NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES -. - Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Floor Plans). 2) Cmplbte Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Required" (at minimum 0 0 lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO - (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES >o NO - 1 b. I (A/P/Qs, I Activity Maimenbnce, ., enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Houslng Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) L .,. - I. Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site- plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, ' right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 0 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. .t . Zoning: @ 0 0 1. Setbacks: Front: Required 20 f Shown ag IQ' Interior Side: Required Ipi Shown Street Side: Rear: Required Shown Required \a Shown 7 laf -0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: -e: Required Shown Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown ' Structure separation: Required Shown don 3. Lot Coverage: Required 40% Shown 52 70 f$ 0 0 4. Height: Required 30 Shown 3%- ' fiu 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 cu Shown 3 cu U' Guest Spaces Required Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER - &, DATE dh!oI H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkflevChklst PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 921 11 TELEPHONE (858) 560-1713, FAX (858) 560-0380 HERMOSA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2541 State Street - Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008-1 964 June 1,2000 Work Order 400729 Attention : Mr. Bob Plein Subject: Geotechnical Foundation Investigation for the 0.8 Acre Cynthia Lane Parcel, APN 156-230-41 -00, in the City of Carlsbad, California References: See Appendix Gentlemen: Presented herein is Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc.'s (PSE) geotechnical foundation evaluation for the 0.8 acre Cynthia Lane Parcel, APN 156-230-41-00, located in the City of Carlsbad, California. This work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated May 16, 2000 on the authorization of Mr. Bob Plein. The purpose of this investigation is to generally characterize site geotechnical condi- tions as they relate to the proposed construction of four (4) wood frame, residential structures supported by slab-on-grade foundation systems. 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK The following scope of work has been performed during PSE's investigation. 0 0 0 Review of published maps and geologic literature. Mark-out and coordination of underground service alert. Excavation, logging and sampling of three (3) exploratory test pits, exca- vated with a John Deere 410E backhoe with 36 inch bucket (Table I). CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY TEL (714) 220-0770 TEL (310) 325-7272 or (323) 775-6771 TEL (909) 676-8195 TEL (714) 730-2122 FAX (714) 220-9589 FAX (714) 220-9589 FAX (909) 676 1879 Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 2 0 Laboratory testing and analyses of bulk samples consisting of: 1) hy- drometer analysis (Table 11); 2) remolded direct shears (Table II and Plates 6-1 and 6-2); 3) compaction characteristics (Table 11); 4) expan- sion index (Table 11); and 5) chemicaI/resistivity testing (Plates C-1 through C-5). General discussion of site geology. 0 0 Limited seismic hazards analysis. 0 Preliminary grading recommendations. 0 Preliminary foundation design recommendations. 0 Preparation of this report and accompanying exhibits summarizing our findings , co ncl u si0 ns and recommendations. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The 0.8 vacant acre parcel is relatively flat with drainage by sheet flow to existing paved streets and associated storm drains. Currently the parcel supports a flower farming operation and existing homes are located to the east and west while Cynthia Lane and Buena Vista Avenue form the south and north bounda- ries. 3.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is assumed that mass grading techniques will be utilized to create building pads, driveways and improve surface drainages for support of four (4) residential structures. It is also understood that the proposed residential wood frame struc- tures will be supported by a slab-on-grade foundation system with shallow foun- dation elements. At this time, the foundation plans are not available for review; PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 3 therefore, the geotechnical design values presented herein are preliminary in nature. When complete, foundation plans should be reviewed for conformance to this report. 4.0 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Although no existing site specific proprietary geotechnical reports were available for PSE’s review, published data (Weber, 1982) indicates the site is underlain by terrace deposits of the Quaternary-age Lindavista Formation. Typically, the Lin- davista Formation consists of brown to reddish brown, silty to clayey sands. Weber indicates Santiago Formation cropping out three-quarters (314) of a mile northeast of the site at the Buena Vista Lagoon and it is likely that Santiago bed- rock underlies the site at depth. Review of the regional geologic information indicates the absence of faulting withidor in immediate proximity of the site. The trace of the Rose Canyon fault is located approximately eight (8) kilometers southwest of the parcel. Owing to the dense character of the Lindavista and underlying Santiago Formation, lique- faction potential is very low. Ground shaking from large seismic events gener- ated along offsite faults is possible, as with most areas in the seismically active southern California area. For structural design purposes, the parameters pre- sented in Table A should utilized for post-graded lots. The site occurs in seismic zone 4, and therefore the seismic zone factor ”Z” is 0.4. These parameters are meant to be consistent with UBC (1997). PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 sc Page 4 0.40Na 0.56NV 1.0 1.1 TABLE A UBC (1 997) Seismic Parameters Soil Profile Type C, CV Na NV Groundwater was not encountered at the time of PSE’s subsurface investigation. It is considered unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during grading op- erations or building construction. It is possible that landscape and/or seasonal rainwater will perch over the relatively dense, Lindavista Formation. Based on PSE’s general experience, the proposed three (3) foot cap is typically sufficient to allow for mitigation of nuisance water conditions. However, if perched condi- tions develop near finish grade surface, additional measures, such as the combi- nation of area drains andlor French drains, may be required. 5.0 SITE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION 5.1 Unsuitable Soil Removals As a general guideline, removals will likely be on the order of three (3) feet and should be accomplished over the entire site. Localized areas may require deeper removals and will depend upon conditions encountered during grading operations. Removal and recompaction should be accomplished for the three back- hoe trenches (TP-1 through TP-3) excavated for this study. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 5 5.2 Existinq Site Improvements To the best of PSE’s knowledge, existing underground improvements do not exist within the proposed building envelopes. Underground utility im- provements exist on the site along Cynthia Lane and Buena Vista Ave- nue. Additionally, residential structures exist on both sides of the subject lot. Given the proximity of the adjacent structures and improvements, care should be taken during grading operations. Accordingly, it should be the contractor’s responsibility to protect adjacent improvements in these areas during grading and building construction. 5.3 Gradinq Compliance Grading should conform to the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad and the attendant PSE earthwork specifications. Field observations will be required during grading by qualified geotechnical personnel. This should include full time observation and testing of fill soil placement by field technician(s) and periodic observation by the soil engineer. 5.4 Site Preparation Prior to grading, the site must be stripped and cleared of existing vegeta- tion, trash, debris and other deleterious materials. These materials should be removed and wasted offsite. 5.5 Removal Excavation Treatment Once removals are completed, the removal excavations should be mois- ture conditioned to optimum moisture or slightly above (ASTM:D 1557-91) and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, prior to placement of compacted fill. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 6 5.6 Compacted Fill Placement Fill should be spread in thin lifts (six to eight inches), the moisture content ‘adjusted to a minimum of optimum moisture or slightly above, and the materials rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM:D 1557-91. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades are achieved. 5.7 Soil Material Suitability Excavated materials, which are approved by the soil engineer, may be utilized in compacted fill provided that trash, vegetation and other delete- rious materials are removed prior to placement. 5.8 Soil Expansion Characteristics The onsite materials are considered to be low expansive in nature. Pre- liminary foundation designs are provided to accommodate this condition. However, as-graded expansive conditions should be confirmed upon completion of grading operations. 5.9 Import Soils Import soils, if needed, should have very low to low expansion properties. The soil engineer should be notified at least 48 hours in advance in order to sample, test and approve or disapprove materials from borrow sites. No import materials should be delivered for use on the site without prior approval by the soil engineer. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 7 5.1 0 ComDaction Testing Fill should be tested at the time of placement to ascertain that the required compaction is achieved. 6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA Laboratory testing indicates the existence of onsite materials that are low in ex- pansion potential. Final expansion potential determinations for the subject lots will be dependent on the post-graded soil conditions. For preliminary design purposes, the following conventional slab-on-grade foundation design parame- ters and recommendations are presented. Prior to construction, the foundation plans should be reviewed by PSE. At that time, finalized recommendationdcomments will be presented. 6.1 Preliminarv Foundation Desiqn Criteria Foundation systems may be preliminarily designed based upon the fol- lowing values. Allowable Bearing: 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. Lateral Bearing: Sliding Coefficient: Settlement: 200 Ibs./sq.ft. at a depth of 12 inches plus 100 Ibs./sq.ft. for each additional 12 inches embedment to a maximum of 2000 Ibs./sq.ft. 0.35 Total = 3/4 inch Differential = 3/8 inch in 20 feet The above values may be increased as allowed by code to resist transient loading conditions, such as wind or seismic. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 8 6.2 Preliminary Conventional Slab-On-Grade Foundation Svstems Conventional foundation systems may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with section 6.1 and Table B. 6.3 Retaining Walls Foundations with retaining walls may be preliminarily designed in accor- dance with recommendations of paragraph 6.1 and the following: 6.3.1 Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Level Backfill Ka = 0.31 Kp = 3.25 KO = 0.47 Equivalent fluid pressures can be calculated utilizing a soil unit weight of 'y = 125 Ibs./fL3. 6.3.2 Other Design Considerations Retaining wall design should consider additional surcharge loads, where appropriate. 6.3.3 Waterproofing and Drainaqe Svstems Cantilever and/or restrained retaining walls should be waterproofed to accommodate the anticipated irrigation water and backfilled with free draining material (SE 3 30) to within 18 inches of grade and compacted to project specifications to minimize water marks. Na- tive soils shall be utilized in the upper 18 inches. Drainage PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 TABLE B CONVENTIONAL FOUNDA TION DESIGN PARAMETERS 12 inches Footinq Width One-Story 12 inches Two-StOW 15 inches Footinq Reinforcement Footinq Embedment Next to Swales and Slopes If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five (5) feet horizontally of the swale, the footing should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings adjacent to slopes should be embedded such that at least seven (7) feet is provided horizontally from edge of the footing to the face of the slope. Garaqes A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage en- trance, tying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness. reinforcement and under-slab treatment should be the same as the structure. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 9 systems including, as a minimum, a four (4) inch diameter perfo- rated drain line surrounded by three (3) cubic feet per lineal foot of three-quarters (314) inch to one (1) inch crushed rock wrapped with a suitable filter fabric, should be provided to all cantilever and re- strained retaining walls to relieve hydrostatic pressure. 6.3.4 Other Appurtenances PSE can provide geotechnical design parameters and subsurface drainage recommendations for pools, spas, flatwork or other hard- scape improvements upon request. 7.0 OTHER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Positive drainage away from structures shall be provided and maintained. 7.2 Utility trench backfill shall be accomplished in accordance with the pre- vailing criteria of the City of Carlsbad. 7.3 Seismic design should be based on current and applicable building code req u ire men ts . 7.4 Soluble sulfate concentrations of the foundation material should be de- termined after grading is complete, when the final distribution of onsite material is known. Preliminary chemical analyses are presented on Plates C-I through C-5. These values should be reviewed by a corrosion engi- neer with respect to concrete specification and cathodic protection. PACIFIC SOILS ENOINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Page 10 The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the specific excavations and observations as noted. The materials immediately adja- cent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics and no rep- resentations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Dist: (6) Addressee .I CER/JACIJAH:KR/OOOO Reviewed't3: / PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 REFERENCES APPENDIX ICBO, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California: International Conference of Building Officials, 3 volumes. Weber, Harold F., 1982, Recent slope failures, ancient landslides and related geology of the north-central coastal area, San Diego County, California: California Divi- sion of Mines and Geology, open file report 82-12 LA. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. UN I F1 ED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS I FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDVRES GROUP SYMBOLS TYFICAL NAMES Wdl-grow pmrsls. qovel lood mxlures. Wde ronqe qon nzes and rubstont~ol orn0unlK of 011 Illlk Q m fuys mtermedate portode was G-. Poorly-prods0 grads. gmnl-sand miitures. PreOorninolely m azo a o mnge of sizes nlh me intermdide sizes mrang Iitlk or ry, fines SAND GRAVEL FINE MEUUM COARSE FINE aRSE SILT OR CLAY I I I 1 I IDENTIFICATION PROEMIRES 1 COBBLES BOUDERS I Orgornc Cloys o( mrhm to high @Orticity. Yadlurn to h,~ b Slight (0 oqonic sills * medlum 0 3= If l 0 I/ /I I Rwdily hdantlliod by color. obor, wongy, kel and frequently by fibrous katura p1 Pool ond other highly orpnic roils HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS BCUIMRY CLEEJFlCAlKNS bk -I+F~ ChOlDLtw~~ho d ).c, vwtn ut bupndm urr&nWm d ~ag -8 PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS CONS1 STENCY CLA S SI F I CATION GRLVJULAR SOL COHESIVE SOIL BEDROCK &try bore vsry loft Lm soft Moderately dense Firm Medium dense Stiff oenrr hry chff Very dorsa Hard MOISTURE CONDITIOU QTHFR SyMBoLs R- Undisturbed sample Dry Slightly mo6t B- Bulk wmpk Moist P Gwndmrter wet Q Groundwater wepoge Sa tu mttd PACtFlC SOILS ENGINEERING INC PLATE A Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 Work Order 400729 Date Excavated 05/19/00 Excavated by CER Equipment John Deere 41 OE with 36” Bucket LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-1 0.0 - 8.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION(Q1v): brown to dark brown, silty, fine sand, slightly moist, moderately dense; common pin hole porosity; common rootlets. @ 1.5 ft. reddish brown to yellowish red, silty, fine to medium sand; trace of clay and coarse sand, moist, moderately to medium dense; massive; structured; structure faces stained with black splotches (magnesium oxide?); common pinhole porosity. @ 2.0 ft. dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4 to 4/4), clayey to silty. @ 4.0 ft. uncommon pinhole porosity. @ 7.0 ft. mottled dark reddish brown and yel- lowish red, silty, fine to medium sand, very moist, medium dense; massive; no structure. SM-SC SM TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June I, 2000 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS sc SM Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-2 0.0 - 8.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION (Qlv): brown, silty, fine to medium sand, trace of coarse sand, moist to very moist; uncommon small rusty red sand clasts; massive; structured; structured surfaces stained black (magnesium oxide?). @ 1 .O ft. reddish brown to yellowish red, clayey, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, medium dense; common small rusty red sand clasts; massive; structured; structured surfaces stained black (magnesium oxide?). @ 6.0 ft. dark reddish brown, slightly silty, fine to coarse sand, slightly moist to moist, very dense; cemented; massive; no structure. TOTAL DEPTH 8.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENQINEERING, INC. Work Order 400729 June 1,2000 TABLE I cont. LOG OF TEST PITS Test Pit No. Depth (ft.) USCS Description TP-3 0.0 - 9.0 SM LINDAVISTA FORMATION (Qlv): brown to dark brown, silty, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, moderately dense; common root- lets. @ 1.5 fi. brown to dark reddish brown, silty, fine to medium sand, moist to very moist, moderately dense; common pinhole porosity; uncommon rootlets; massive. @ 3.0 ft. dark reddish brown, silty to clayey, fine to medium sand, very moist, medium dense; slightly cemented, slightly structured; slight pinhole porosity; some black staining on structured surfaces; very uncommon rootlets. @ 4.0 ft. dark reddish brown, clayey, fine to med'ium sand, very moist, medium dense; massive; no structure; no visible porosity. SM-SC sc TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. NO WATER, NO CAVING PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 2 U I- v) w I- n LL 0 > K I 5 frr 8 4,000 3,750 Silty Sand SM 3,500 ~ ~ COHESION 0 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 33 degrees 3,250 symbol 0 3,000 bonng depth (R) symbol boring depth (fl) TP-I 10 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 Convoy Court, S D CA 921 11 W.O. 400729 PLATE B-1 (619) 560-1713 2,750 symbol 0 cu bonng depth (R) symbol boring depth (fl) TP-I 10 DIRECT SHEAR TEST PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 Convoy Court, S D CA 921 11 W.O. 400729 PLATE B-1 (619) 560-1713 2,500 F i v) 0 w v) 2,250 2,000 5 1,750 w L v) 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS 1bs.lf-f 2 DIRECT SHEAR TEST DIRECT SHEAR TESTS REMOLDED @ 90% Clayey Sand sc-CL 4,000 1 COHESION 125 psf. FRICTION ANGLE 32 degrees 3.750 syrnbd 0 - 3,500 boring depth (R.) syrnbd boring depth (R.) TP-2 3.0 DIRECT SHEAR TEST PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 7715 Convoy Court, S.D. CA 921 11 W.O. 400729 PLATE B-2 (61 9) 560-1 71 3 3,250 3.000 2,750 2,500 2,250 F v) v) w E 2,000 n 4 1,750 v) 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 tI !I I!!! f 1:; I I !! I ! It 1 I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL STRESS Ibs./fi 2 05/31/00 \\'ED 13: 54 FAX 9093701046 +++ PSEI-SD @OD2 < Del MarAnalytical 28S2 AIm AVO , IMne. CA 92606 1014 E Cooley Of., SUkS A. Colion. CA 82324 (M9) 261-1022 FAX (949) 261-1226 (SOS] 5704667 FAX (009) Z'C-lWE 18525 Snerrnart w.1~. Sulie C.11. vsn NV5. CA 9m8 wad ctvsapaw Dr.. Surle 805, sw ~~sgc. CA 921% (R18) m-1814 FAX (ais) 779.1WS (6ie~505-859e FAX (6191 me688 98JO SOU* Sim SI, SUIIS 0.120, PhWtW. AZ 85044 (dE0) 7854W FAX (4801 78S-0851 Sampled: 05/25/00 wort Nurnbcr: CEO332 Received: 05/26/00 Analyte Method Sample ID: CJE0332-01 (TP-l@l' - Soil) PH EPA 9M5C Sample ID: CJEO332-02 (TP-2@' - Soil) PH EPA 9045C Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder INORGANICS Reporting Sample Dilution Date Date Dntn Bttdt Limit Result Factor Extracted Analyzed Qualifiers pH Units pH Units COIE2635 Nh 4.66 1 5/26/00 5/26/00 COE2615 NA 6.91 1 5R6/00 5/26/00 Plate C-1 05/31/00 WED 13:55 FAX 9093701046 +++ r5ti-w UUJ L Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. Client Projed 11): 400229 7715 Convoy Court San Digo, CA 921 11 Atttntion: bnBuckley Sampled: 05/25/00 Rccelved: 05/26/00 ReportNumbt:r: CJE0332 c Del MarAnalytical Allon Avo.. IMne, CA92606 (8aE) 281.1022 FAX (9W 261.1228 1014 E Cooley Or. Suite 4 C01101~. CA 92U (909) 3Y0.4667 Fnx 19081 370-106 16525 3nemn Way, SUllb C-11 VWI Nuyz. CA 92406 ed8C ChcrnFnJko Or. SUNO 805, Sen Diego. CA 92123 (818) 779-1814 FAX (818) 779-1W l8lQl505-9596 FAX (CIS) 905.9689 9830 Smith Sls1 SL, Sulle 8-120. Pnoenlx. A2 ESOLd (4801 785-0048 FAX (480) 7854851 Analyte INORGANICS Roportlnpr Sample Dilution Date Da tt Data Method Batdi Limit Result Factor Extllrcted Annlyzcd Qualifiers m%kg Sample ID: CJEO332-01 (TP-1 @I' - Soil) Chloride EPA 300.0 IOE30:!2 5.0 ohmdcm Sample ID: CJEO332-01 (TP-l@l' -Soil) Resistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOE3037 700 % Sample ID: CJE0332-01 (TP-I@' - Soil) Soluble Sulfate B'A 300.0 IOaO:!2 0.00050 mglkg Sample ID: CJEO332-02 (TP-2@3' - Soil) Chloride EPA300.0 10E30::2 5.0 ohmslcm Sample ID: CJEO332-02 (Tp-2@.3' - Soil) Raistivity EPA 120.1 MOD. IOE30z.7 700 70 Samplc 11): CJE0332-02 (TP-263 - Soil) Soluble Sulfate €PA 300.0 IOE30::2 0.00050 Dei Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager Wkg 8.1 1 5/30100 5/30/00 ohmdcm 2100 1 5/30/00 5/30/00 % 0.0070 1 5/30100 5/30/00 mglkg 9.9 I 5/30/00 5/30/00 ohmskm 5400 1 5130lOO 5130100 YO 0.0060 1 5130100 5130/00 Plate C-2 c Del MarAnalytical 2852 AlIEn AW , INlnB. Cn 92dOC 1014 E Cwley Df , Suha A. Collon. CA VU24 1652.5 Sherrnm Nay. Sum Gll, Van Nup. CAS2408 9dBA Chmopoake Df.. bIi0 805, SW Diego. Ch 92123 9830 sourn 51n SI, suns 5120. Phccnlx. nZ Ysou (9ql261-1022 FAX (Bas) 281-1228 19091 370-6667 FAX (909) S!O*lO~C (WE) 779.1844 FAX (8181 779-1842 I6191 505-9596 FAX (UBI 5054CR9 (480) 185-0063 FAX (reor 785.0851 I Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. Client Projed TI): 400729 771 5 Convo Courr San Diego, 921 11 Report Numbfir: CEO332 Attention: Ron Budcley Sampled 05/25/00 Received: 05/26/00 Anslyto INORGANICS Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Data Result Limit hits Levcl Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifiers Batch: COE2605 Extracted: 05/26/00 Duplicate Annlyzd: 05/26/00 (COE2605-DUPI) PH 4.46 NA p 3 Units 4.66 Source: CJE0332-01 4.39 5 Plate C-3 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager 7h mwfrrperlun ofl& fo rhcsomplu *.wed mrhc Iaboruory Thisrcpurr rkll IIO; bc rtprvducul, uuql III (14 v~thuvr w~rtcnplr nrrrunfitmr Del Mar hnolytarl. CJEU332 < 4 01 6, < Del MarAnalytical Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. Client Projea 11): 400729 771 5 Convoy Court Sampkd: 05/25/00 Ssn Diego, CA 921 11 ReportNunbl:r: CEO332 Received 05/26/00 I Attention: Ron Budtley Aanlyte INORGANICS Reportiog Spike Source %REC RPD Data Result Limit llnits Level Rwult %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifiers Batch: 1OF3OU Extracted: 05/30/00 Blank Annlyzcd: 05/30/00 (IOWOZZ-BLICI) Chloride ND 5.0 m66 Soluble Sulfate ND 0.00050 % LCS Analyzed: 05/30/00 (IOFJ022-BS1) Chloride 47.6 5 -0 mglkg 50.0 95.2 90-110 Soluble Sulfplc 0.00957 0.60050 oh 0.0100 95.7 90-110 Matrix Spike Analyzed: 05130/00 (IOE3022-MSl) Chloridc 54.3 s.0 mg/kg 50.0 B.l 92.4 so-120 Soluble Sulk 0.0163 0.00050 9'0 0.0100 0.0070 93.0 SO-120 Matrix Spike Dup Analyzed: OYSOlOO (IOE3022-MSDl) Chloridc 55.9 s.0 mgnig 50.0 8.1 95.6 80-120 2.90 20 Soluble Sulfnk 0.0 I67 0.00050 % 0.0100 0.0070 97.0 SO-120 2.42 20 Batch: IOE3037 Extracted: 05/30/00 Duplicate Annlyrcd: 05/30/00 (IOE3037-DUPl) Rcsistiviv 2200 700 thmslcm 2200 0 20 Source: UE0332-01 Source: CJE0332-01 Source: CJ60333-01 Del Mar Analytical, Colton Jeanne Shoulder Project Manager Plate C-4 < Del MarAnalytical 2852 AIm Avc.. INinn. CA92606 1014 E ~ooroy Dr.. Su~e A. conon. CA~BZ~ 16525 Snerrnsn way. suile Gii. van NU^. C~eaoe 9484 Che88oe9ke 01.. Suile 805, Ssn Dlugo. CA92123 9830 Soulh 51:1 SI ~ Suib 8.120. Phmq A2 8CW (Dag) 261-1025 FAX (940) 261.1228 (soel 370-4667 FAX (eoei 370-1066 (818)77PlW FAX (aid) 779.1863 (C19) 505-9596 FAX (Gl9) fOfr9G89 (40) 78.50043 FAX (4eO\ 785.0851 Sampled: 05/25 100 Received 0 5/26/00 Report Nunbrr CJE0332 DATA QUALIFIER.S AND DEFINITIONS ND NR Notreported. RPD Relative Percent Difference AnalyteNOTDETECTED at or above the reponing limit or MDL, if MDL is specified. Del Mar Analytical, Colton Project Manager Jeanne Shoulder Plate C-5 7hr rcru~lrperruh tothc.\ompIcr kHd In dr luborolory. Thin rdpnrt.thullnnt bcrepducc! cnylr iir UE0332c 6 of 6> fun. drh0Ut WrltKNp~ '~is..:riIJnJhJm DC! Mur Ann/yrwl. PROJEC TE NTATIVE LI <.Tp-2) - Approxima GENERAL IN FOR MATI C N DEVELOPER/APPLICANT: HERMOY. HOMES 2551 STATE STREET ORLSW. CA 92W8 PHONE (760) 729-7964 OWNER: ROY H. WLUM L HOPE M. CMTELUM xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx XxxxXXXXX PLAN PREPARED BY: AM PLANNING ASSOCIATES 2979 STATE STREET. Sum C URLSfUD. CA 92W (7~3) 729-8637 ENGINEER: MOM UIICMURWY 619) 921-5066 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PollTKHl Of ME NORMST PUIRTER OF SECTKm 6. TOWNSHIP 12 SOUlH. WE 4 WET. UH BERNUWNO BASE AND MERlW IN THE Cm Of CAQLSW COUNTY OF SAN DIECO. RATE 6F WOWk ACCORMNG f0 UNmO STATES GwERNuDn SURW AppR(MD OCTOBER 25. 1875. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 (858) 560-1713 I W.0.: 400729 DATE: 6/01/00 I GRADING DATA: 101M LOT bRLk XXX AC. lOlM WWN Of Sm TO BE GIUDW: XXX K. ERCWI Of TOlM WE GPNJfO XXX % +UWN OF Sm mC 25X UWES OR CRUX+: 0 K ERCEN Of TOTM Sllf mC 25% SLOPES M1 GRUTER: 0 X MwxIMl of cm: n. ;t AyovNloFw m. 3 WWM OF iumm/mpom SMV CY ;t CONSTRAINTS INFORMATION: Emv*ncus mi mE PROPCRRTI RANG mou XXX TO atX IN XXX - AKRAK POPE IS XX PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS These specifications present generally accepted standards and minimum earthwork requirements for the development of the project. These specifications shall be the project guidelines for earthwork except where specifically superceded in preliminary geology and soils reports, grading plan review reports or by prevailing grading codes or ordinances of the controlling agency. I. GENERAL A. The contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. B. The project Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist or their representatives shall provide testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. C. All clearing, grubbing, stripping and site preparation for the project shall be accomplished by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. D. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fills to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and to place, spread, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the job specifications and as required by the Soil Engineer. The Contractor shall also remove all material considered by the Soil Engineer to be unsuitable for use in the construction of compacted fill. E. The Contractor shall have suitable and sufficient equipment in operation to handle the amount of fill being placed. When necessary, equipment will be shut down temporarily in order to permit proper compaction of fills. II. SITE PREPARATION A. Excessive vegetation and all deleterious material shall be disposed of offsite as required by the Soil Engineer. Existing fill, soil, alluvium or rock materials determined by the Soil Engineer as being unsuitable for placement in compacted fills sliall be removed and wasted fiom the site. Where applicable, the Contractor may obtain the approval of the Soil Engineer and the controlling authorities for the project to dispose of the above described materials, or a portion thereof, in designated areas onsite. After removals as described above have been accomplished, earth materials deemed unsuitable in their natural, in-place condition, shall be removed as recommended by the Soil EngineerEngineering Geologist. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 2 B. After the removals as delineated in Item 11, A above, the exposed surfaces shall be disced or bladed by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer. The prepared ground surfaces shall then be brought to the specified moisture condition, mixed as required, and compacted and tested as specified. In areas where it is necessary to obtain the approval of the controlling agency, prior to placing fill, it will be the contractor's responsibility to notifjr the proper authorities. C. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines or others not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner prescribed by the Soil Engineer andor the controlling agency for the project. ID. COMPACTED FILLS A. Any materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill, provided each material has been determined to be suitable by the Soil Engineer. Deleterious material not disposed of during. clearing or demolition shall be removed from the fill as directed by the Soil Engineer. B. Rock or rock fragments less than eight inches in the largest dimension may be utilized in the fill, provided they are not placed in concentrated pockets and the distribution of the rocks is approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Rocks greater than eight inches in the largest dimension shall be taken offsite, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. D. All fills, including onsite and import materials to be used for fill, shall be tested in the laboratory by the Soil Engineer. Proposed import materials shall be approved prior to importation. E. The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that when compacted shall not exceed six inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain a near uniform moisture condition and a uniform blend of materials. All compaction shall be achieved at optimum moisture content, or above, as determined by the applicable laboratory standard. No upper limit on the moisture content is necessary; however, the Contractor must achieve the necessary compaction and will be alerted when the material is too wet and compaction cannot be attained. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 3 F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below the limit specified by the Soil Engineer, water shall be added and the materials shall be blended until a uniform moisture content, within specified limits, is achieved. Where the moisture content of the fill material is above the limits specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill materials shall be aerated by discing, blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the limits specified. Each fill layer shall be compacted to minimum project standards, in compliance with the testing methods specified by the controlling governmental agency and in accordance with recommendations of the Soil Engineer. In the absence of specific recommendations by the Soil Engineer to the contrary, the compaction standard shall be ASTM:D 1557-91. Where a slope receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five-horizontal to one-vertical, the fill shall be keyed and benched through all unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material, in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Soil Engineer. Side hill fills shall have a minimum key width of 15 feet into bedrock or firm materials, unless otherwise specified in the soil report and approved by the Soil Engineer in the field. Drainage terraces and subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency and/or with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist. The contractor shall be required to maintain the specified minimum relative compaction out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and stabilization fills as directed by the Soil Engineer and/or the governing agency for the project. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure which produces the designated result. Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or creep material into rock or firm material; and the transition shall be stripped of all soil or unsuitable materials prior to placing fill. The cut portion should be made and evaluated by the Engineering Geologist prior to placement of fill above. Pad areas in natural ground and cut shall be approved by the Soil Engineer. Finished surfaces of these pads may require scarification and recompaction. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 4 IV. CUTSLOPES A. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes and shall be notified by the Contractor when cut slopes are started. B. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potentially adverse . geologic conditions are encountered, the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to treat these problems. C. Non-erodible interceptor swales shall be placed at the top of cut slopes that face the same direction as the prevailing drainage. D. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. E. Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, andor in accordance with the recommendations of the Soil Engineer or Engineering Geologist. V. GRADING CONTROL A. Fill placement shall be observed by the Soil Engineer andor his representative during the progress of grading. Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer or his representative to evaluate the compaction and moisture compliance of each layer of fill. Density tests shall be performed at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density determinations shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface at a depth determined by the Soil Engineer or his representative. B. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed over an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements and that lift approved by the Soil Engineer. C. Where the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until field observations and tests by the Soil Engineer indicate the moisture content and density of the fill are within the limits previously specified. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Earthwork Specifications Page 5 D. During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded area until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. E. Observation and testing by the Soil Engineer shall be conducted during the filling and compacting operations in order that he will be able to state in his opinion all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved specifications. F. After completion of grading and alter the Soil Engineer and Engineering Geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports shall be submitted. No firther excavation or filling shall be undertaken without prior notification of the Soil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist. IV. SLOPE PROTECTION All finished cut and fill slopes shall be planted and/or protected from erosion in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL TYPE A I NOTE: FINAL 20‘ OF PIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED TYPICAL BENCHING SEE DETAIL ALTERNATE “B’(PLATE G-2) NUTE:FlNaL ZO’OFPIPE AT OUTLET SHALL BE NON-PERFORATED PLATE G-/ PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. k 0. DATE CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS ALTERNATE I PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL 3 6 IN MlN FILTER MATERlAL.YIN.VVL. W9FT /LIN. FT 6 IN. 0 ABS OR PVC PIPE OR APPROVED I2 I SUBSTITUTE WITH YIN. E PERf,l/4 IN 9 PER LINEAL FOOT IN BOT TOM HALF of 6 IN YIN. PIPE. ASTM DZ;r51, SDR 35 OR ASTY 03034, SDR35 OR B-J ASTM 01527, SCHD 40 ASTM 01785, SCUD 40 A-l FOR CONTINUOUS RUN IN EXCESS OF 500 FEET USE 8IN.0 PIPE ALT€RNAT€ 2 FILTER MATERIAL WRAPPED IN FABRIC 6 IN. YIN OVERLAP I IN MAX GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC I tK MAX GRAVEL ORAPPROVED EOUIVALENT 9F73/F7 MIRAFI I40 FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EOUIVAL ENT (TYPICAL) PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE NATIVE BACUFILL AFI IS0 FILTER FABRIC OR MOVED EOUIVALENT I IN MAX.OPEN CRADEV GRAVEL OR APPROVED EOUIVALENT DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRA IN TERM iNA L FOR A LTERNA TES A2 AND 82' M NON- PERF KRF 6 IN 6 IN.fiYIN gYIN PIPE ALTERNAT€ 3 PERFORATEDPIPESURROUNDED 6 WITH FILTER MATERIAL 0 61N MIN COVER PERFORATED PIPE 6 IN 8 YIN FILTER MATERIAL SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING I IN. IO0 3/4 IN. $O-IOO 3/8 IN. 40 -100 NO. 8 I8 -33 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING INC. NO. 50 0- 7 w. 0. PLATE G-2 DATE N0.4 25 -40 NO.30 5-15 NO. PO0 0 -3 c c, 0 c c cut Lot Cut-Fill Lot (Transition) I I LOverexcovot e and Recompoct Unweothered Bedrock e deeper ovaexcovotion may be required by the soils engineer in steep cut -fill tronsition areas PAC1 Fl C SOILS EN GINEERINC, JNC. w. 0. DATE 8 PLATE G-4- c 0 LL - c - 6 0 c .- Q, P - .- 0 c % c 0 Q, c 0 .- W I- 0 a 0 3’ Selective Grading Detail for Stabilization Fill Unstable Moteriol Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope 0- finis F”>‘ 0 .I I, .,<\\$& J+Wy$ ’ -c/ Un weothered Bedrock or approved material Klll1ll1,1 1 I1 I I ,L, Ai75 ?;$& 1 NOTE: 1. 2. Subdrains are not required unless specified. “W” shall be equipment width (15’) for slope heights less than 25 feet. For Slopes greater than 25feet UW”sholl be determined by the project soils cngineer/peologist. At no time shall “WB‘be less than H/2. PLATE G-7 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, JNC. H! 0. DATE 4 4 ii I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I rJ 1 1 I I ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL FINISH GRADE CLEAR AREA FOR FOUffDATlOffS, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS. 10' or as described by report Q 'Ca 3-77 FINISH SLOPE FACE CB NOTE.. IF NECESSARY, OVERSUED MATERIAL SHOULD Bf REMOVED FROM THE f5 FOOT ZONE WITH SPECIAL EOUlPMENT,SUCH AS A ROCU RAK€,PRIOR TO PLACING THE NEXT FILL LIFT. TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (END VIEW) HORIZONTA L LY PL A CE 0 COM PA CTE 0 FILL GRAffUlAR SOIL FlOOOED TOFILL VOIDS NOT€:COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE BROUGHT LP AT A HIGHER ELEVATION ALONG WINDROW SOGRANULAR SOIL CAN BEFLOODED INA "TRENCH CONDITION". PROFILE VIEW PLATE G-IO PACIF/C SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. I w. 0. DATE ~ City of Carlsbad CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: L5-L 3 Plan Building Check Permit Number: Project Address: /d{ (5 /5U&wL55 A.P.N.: (56- t3d - $7 o,,i>qguq I 4 e Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Number of New Dwellinq Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 3337 ;f= Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Commercial/lndustriaI: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: Date: (&zh/ Net Square Feet New Area /, I I f . -CTS 00 WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ( Carlsbad Unifi San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) 801 Pine Ave. CA 9 Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 7 10 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of ApplicantlOwners. The person executing this declaration (“Owner“) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner’s knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owneddeveloper of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: )$+L Date: 7(nb\ 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-731 4 - (760) 602-2700 - FAX (760) 602-8560 @ Revised 4120100 .. SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WJLL BE SATISFIED. ................................................................................................... SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER November 26,2001 To: File Buena Vista Ave Homes '-, ! / From: Principal Building Inspector -/' Re: Neighbor call I received a telephone call at home from a neighbor, Benny Ruiz at approximately 8 p.m. on Saturday night, November 24th. It was raining, and Mr. Uiz complained to me that the developer had diverted water into his property, and Police Dispatch would not assist him. I advised him that Police Dispatch should call out the duty man for the Streets Dept. Mr. Ruiz said they had, and he was waiting for the duty man to call him. Then Mr. Ruiz asked if I could use my influence with the City to have the dispatcher get more of a response to his concern. I advised Mr. Ruiz that I cannot influence Police dispatch to do more than they had done to that point. I did review the site this morning and could see no evidence that the developer had intentionally diverted water to Mr. Ruiz's property. Since Ruiz was calling this morning and claimed I'.. .I had given him the runaround already", Christine Wauschek also referred the matter to Engineering Inspections via email for a review of their erosion control measures.