The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1435 FOREST AVE; ; CB880658; Permit-a) I U a) 'a' 51 C sir'Ai ipni'Drt niivt PDrtIiADn APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. 2 - 0 hereby affirm that I am licensed under C) - provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with I "i-Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business I - and Professions Code, and my license is In Ii,' full force and effect. - - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contrac- tors License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 - .,., Business and Professions Code: Any city or county whicr, re quires a permit to Construct, alter, improve, demolish, or ._ repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires he ap- - plicunt lot such permit to file a. signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the contractor's License Law (Chapter 9 commencing' with Section '7000 of Division 301 the Business and Professions Code) or that is en' empt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any I: violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit sob' 'ects the applicant to Civil penalty 01 not more than live hun- dred dollars ($500). I I 'as owner of the property, or my employees with wages - as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the struc- lore is not intended or uttered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business -• and Professions Code:' The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an'owner .01 property who builds or improves all ')ther000 and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intend - W ed or offered for salejI It. however, the building or improve Z _monf is sold within one year 01 completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or im' prove for the purpose 01 sale). I I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: .The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who solids or im ' proves thereon and who contracts for each projects with a' contractor(s) 'license pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I') As a homeowner lam improving my home. and the follow' ing conditions exist: f. The work is being performed prier to sale. I have lived in my home for twelve months prior to completion of this work I have not Claimed this exemption during the last three years. - - " £2 tam exempt under Sec. '_'. B& P.C. for this reasOn 0I hereby affirm trtt I have "a certificate 01 consent to A - setl.insure. or a certificate Of Workers' Compensation lit. surance. or a Certified COPY thereof (Sec. 3800. LabOr Code) POLICY NO, .-' tA. .. o ' COMPA ,, NY ,• - ,_ 0 Copy is tiled with the city 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished Ui 0.. . . . . . • ' . S 'x.. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM'.- - U . WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed it the permit 1i5 'for one hundred dollars ISrODI or less) UJ C II certify that in the performance of the work for which IX this permit is issued. I shall not employ any person in any 0 - manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Cornpen. 1Sati0n Laws of Calliornia. * • 'NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If. after making this Certificate. .ot Exemption. you Should become subject to the Workers', Compensation provisions of the Labor Code. you rrrusr forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shalt be deemed revoked, 1 Cl I hereb'y affirm that there is a construction lending agcncy for the performance of the work for which this per. Cl mit is issued Sec. 3097, Civil Code) zuj i Lender's Name— _J L Lender's Address_______________________________ CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT . APPLICATION & PERMIT .2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 (619) 438-1161 JOB ADDRESS u, , AV. ST. RD. THOMAS BROS NO. DATE OF APP ICATION BUSINESS LICENSE VALUATION - - PERMIT NUMBER -_/55 . ZONE LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS PHONE N / — //O -/ a OWNER'S NAME . OWNER'S PHONE BUILDING SO. FOOTAGE - - J,J*'7_)_t**Iç . , CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS . STATE LICENSE NO. ,A5,• OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS DESIGNER • A'1 z+cti9 G -~~6, - DESIGNER'S PHONE OESC IPTION OF RK 79 A:. Igeg.etij _,,,.l.aj,,,,,,,, . DESIGNER'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. - -s ' F/F F LR ELEV. NO STORIES OCCP EDU 1462 '08/23/88 0001 01- 02 -- - .. ' -' YO NS"____I BldPmt 456.0 - -' CENSUS TRACT PARKING SPACE REX UNITS ' GRADING PERMIT ISSUED REDEVELOPMENT - - TYPE . DCC LOAD FIRE SPA AREA yD Y N ' 3& , Y N 91f Not Valid Unless Machine Certified - - QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT - ISSUE. QTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT - ISSUE ' - . SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER -- - EACHFIXT,URE5T'RAP, , INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UPTO100,000BTU BUILDING PERMIT 757-810-00-00'8220 'EACH BUILDING SEWERS.. '' , ,OVER 100,000BTU , SIGN PERMIT 001'810-00'00'8221 j, EACH WATER-HEATER AND/ORVENT ' BOILER/COMPRESSOR UPTO 3Hip - PLAN CHECK ' - 001-810-00-00'8891' 43 EACH GAS SYSTEM 1104 OUTLETS ' . BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3 15 HP , TOTAL PLUMBING 001'810'00'O0'8222 0 — EACH GAS SYSTEM S OR MORE ' . - METALFIREPLACE ' ELECTRICAL 001-810-00-00-8223 /5.5 EACH INSTAL.. ALTER. REPAIR WATER PIPE , VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT £ ' -- . MECHANICAL 001-810-00-00-8224 - - - EACH VACUUM BREAKER ' . - MECHEXHAUST -HOOD/DUCTS MO8ILEHOME 001-810-00'O0-8225 'WATERSOFTNER ,''I ', , RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER , SOLAR -001'810'00'00-8226 - EACH ROOF,'DRAIN (IN SIDE) ' . . ' DRYERVENT •_,• _.1 -.. ..STRONGMOTION ... _880-519'92'33 TOTnL MECHANICAL - ' -- - - , FIRE SPRINKLERS 001'810'00'OO'8227 TO!ALPLUMBING _I_'._- 4' PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE' 320'810'OO-00'8740 4 4 r -''- - ' BRIDGE FEE 360-810'00-00'8740 QTY. ' ELECTRICAL PERMIT'- ISSUE' ' QTY. - ' MOBILE HOME SETUP • PARK'IN'LIEUIAREA - - NEW CON ST EA AMP'SWiUKR -, . ' - - CAR PORT • ' . . - TIE --312-810-00'00'8835 3PH' ___-, ' AWNING .'' , ,LA COSTA TIF ,311-810-00-00-8835 - ' - EXIST BLDG'EAAMP/SWI/BKR - - .' GARAGE . FMF !PH ' •' 3 PH - ----- - ' ' , - LICENSE TAX -001'810'00'00'8162 ' ' ' - REMODEL'ALTlR PER CIRCUIT ,_. . MFF 880'519-92'57 TEMP PO'LE'20'O AMPS ". - OVER 200 AMPS- '-""\'.. TEMP OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS) "T, CREDIT DEPOSIT -TITTAL' ELECT RICAI' ___ .. TOTA)7f_'\. .' TOTAL FEES PAYABLE'-.ø - --. * AN OSHA PERM:T IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER or perm pqr mIt ssu9lbytfreBuitdrngOffrcIalunderfheprovisionsof this I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT" AND DO HEREBY Euplralion authorized CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shalle by Jimand become null of commenced with and void It the building or WO in 180 days from the date of such b 0" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS permit or i the buiIdin, work aulhonrzad by such permit is suspended or STRUCTURES OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON abandoned STRUCTION. WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND , COSTS A APP ICA S E * _Ia_t'm,,41ertheworkiscommencedforaperiodof180days. nWELJ CONTRACTOR Ii AP VIED BY .. DATE, KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS. EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY-ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEOUENCE THE BY PHONE 0 GRANTING OF SRI TYPE DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUN ITE OR GROUT SUB FRAME Li FLOOR Li CILING SHEATHING OOF 'SHEAR FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL / PLUMBING LI SEWER AND BL/CO Li PL/CO UNDERGROUND Li WASTE LiWATER TOP OUT ASTE PWATER TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST Li WATER HEATER Li SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL Li ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND DUFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC _________ Li ELECTRIC SERVICE Li TEMPORARY Li BONDING Li POOL MECHANICAL I Li DUCT & PLEM., Li REF. PIPING HEAT -AIRCOND. SYSTEMS 1,1/56 VENTILATING SYSTEMS CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED. FINAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL 1 A GAS h:~4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS BUILDING _ JAI oo ________ FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTORS NOTES NSPECTION REQ. IF C<D INSPECTOR'S DATE COMPLIANCE TO WSOUNCATIONINSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI P 9V TENSIONED CONCRETE PR ED FIELD WELDING BOLTS HIGH STRENGTH SPECIAL MASONRY PILES CAISSONS - FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 880658 1-26-'89 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 1435 Forest Avenue . . .1 PROJECT NO.: _________________ UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: RES TI NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: Ole Nesby CONTACTTELEPHONE: 728-3111 Bldg, Engin, Plan, Fire, Water SPECTED DATE SPECTED JAN 27-1989 APPROVED DISAPPROVED,BY: IN INSPECTED . DATE BY: INSPECTED:. APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED . DATE. BY: . . INSPECTED:. ___________ APPROVED DISAPPROVED Gosta Real Municipal Water bstrict COMMENTS: Engineering Department (619) 438-3367 ¼ Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ' 880658 • ' ., 1-26--89 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: _________________ DATE: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 1435. Forest' Avenue , PROJECT NO.: ' , UNIT NUMBER:' ' PHASE NO.: TYPE' OF UNIT: RES TI NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: Ole Nesbv CONTACT TELEPHONE: 728-3141 ' Bldg. Engin, Plan, Fire, Water ' INSPECTED / ' DATE •' BY: ' INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED ' DATE BY: ' INSPECTED: ' APPROVED ' 'DISAPPROVED INSPECTED ' DATE BY: ' INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ' , DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: ' .• ' , 4' - - Re,. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire * t,., •. .,, - . FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 880658 . . .1-26-89 PLAN CHECKNUMBER: ___________________________________ DATE:' - •_4 PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 1435 Forest Avenue PROJECT NO.: __________________ UNIT NUMBER: PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: RESTI NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: *Ole N$bY • . . CONTACT TELEPHONE: 128-3141 Bldg, Engin, Plan, Fire, Water BY: INSPECTED: SPECTED DATE 1/? APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: _______________________ INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED H INSPECTED DATE . •.' . BY::_______________________ INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED - .• COMMENTS: • •z. .1 Rev. 1186 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING IN5PTIUN : PLAN CHECK NUMBER: - DATE: PROJECT NAME: .. - ADDRESS: 1435 Forest Avnu - - . PROJECT NO. - UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: TYPE OFUNIT: NUMBEROFUNITS: . .- . CONTACT PERSON: - 01C NSbY . . : CONTACT TELEPHONE: 728-3141 '. -. .. : iig Engln, Water INSPECTED • . DATE /i - .. BY: -i- • INSPECTED: ________" APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE - BY: - - INSPECTED: - APPROVED - DISAPPROVED INSPECTED • DATE - BY: INSPECTED: . APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED 4. •4 . • COMMENTS: - • . - .4p .14. - .5 . -4 5 . - - - • - • . - . • .• -.4 - Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN:.Englneering CANARY:-Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 L. \z4ta SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560-1468 . DATE: ('t\ 28 EAP RI'DIC ON JURISDICTION: - ER []FILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: 0z2 SET: CUPS ODESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: 43 Forç-r . PROJECT NAME i3i\fl4 proo' fl The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected-where necessary and substantially comply with the .jur1sdiction's building codes. .• . . . The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply E2'2 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified o -r P-r--C are resolved and :.'checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies • -identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and'-resbmitted for a complete recheck. fl Thecheck list transmitted herewith is for your information. Theplans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected • plans are submitted for recheck. • •• • - -' fl The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the • jurisdiction to return to. the applicant contact person. the applicant's copy ofthe check list-has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. . fi Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan --check has been completed. Person contacted:.________________________ - Date contacted: • . Telephone #• '• REMARKS: Enclosures:CoR.LI-rw(4I11MS •- ESGIL CORPORATION . . 14 . ('rfl rA )'rt12 Crw7z. IWA AUK _ _Ar •• - WA rirr _I_iJY wj Alm P 4. Date (aj( Jurisdictior_____________ Prepared byt Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECKFEE Esgil PLAN CHECK NO._B 0cp BUILDING ADDRESS -_4 L5 vZ APPLICANT/CONTACT ThVV PHONE NO.4 S? BUILDING OCCUPANCY - DESIGNER PHONE___________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION . CONTRACTOR PHONE__________ JBUILDINGPORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE. -. Lxu i9 •. Cato 00 17 Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers . Total Value 4-•4-3 1 Building Permit Fee $_3 PI Check Fee 2 '5Z 3 - - - $ ,COMMZNTS; SHEET OF 12/87 ENGINEERING CHECKLIST LEGEND Date: Item Complete - Plan Check No. 88063 Project Address /$/Esi" I tem - P Incomplete - Needs Action Project Narnez WQzn.# Jooi11o,) Field Check Date 1,2,3 Number in: circle indicates ; plancheck • By: . . ' number that deficiency was' identified . .' •• LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ) W W ', , - > K > '> Site Plan . . Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North /.th o •• arrow, property lines,, easements, - existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. I ,.• -. I - Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations, of finish graded adjacent to building, existing topographical, lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway and percent (%) grade and 'drainage patterns. •. •. . . ' Ell 3 Provide legal description of property. ( D E 4 Provide assessor's parcel number. PERMITS REQUIRED Grading - 5. Grading permit 'required. (Separate. 'submittal to Engineering Department required for - Grading Permit). 6 Grading plans inpian check PE__________ 7. Need the following completed prior to, building permit issuance: 121" D' fl • - A. Grading plans signed'. 121" C] 0 B Grading permit issued F~0 C] C. , Grading completed C] C] D.' Certification letter and compaction reports submitted 12i' 0 0 E Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector. 0 ' 0 C] ' 8. ' Right-of-Way Permit required for work Iir, public right-of-way - (e.g., driveway approach,".sidewalk, 'connection to, water main, • - ' etc). -.9. Industrial Waste Permit' application required. To filled out ,be completely and returned to Development Processing'. 71 I -FEES REQUIRED . 10. Park-in-Lieu fees_requjred. . • • Quadrant: , Fee Per Unit:. Total Fee:________ 11. Traffic impact fee required. 1,1 Fee Per Unit: Total Fee ciJ'7L/ 0 0 12 Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required .. Fee Per Unit: __- , Total Fee: 0 0 13 Public facilities fee required 0 14..Facilities management fee required Fee 1-" o 15. Additional EDU's required: D) . - t4J Sewer connection fee - Sewer ermit no 0 0 16 Sewer lateral required - REMARKS I 0 7 0 0• 0 . V K to issu ate If you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan check, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1161 I 4 ¼ 0 13 PLANNING CHECKLIST co ca ca Plan Check No Address 2 2 2 Type of Project and Use 5FD 'qO1-1, Zone Use Allowed' YES £ NO Setback: Front Side Rear 4 - - Facilities Management Zone School District: San Dieguito Encinitas ;- / E1' Q 0 Carlsbad Discretionary Action Required YES : San Marcos NO Type 7fl 0 Environmental Required YES NO 0 Landscape Plan Required YES - NO - Comments - 0 Coatal Permit Required YES ':NO O 0 0 Additional Comments 0K TO ISS 5 DATE V. 'V. •. 'V HETHERINGTON ENGINEERINGi INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS December 9, 1987 .ProjectNo. 211.1 Mr. Tom Worth 1435 Forest Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject:. FOUNDATION. INVESTIGATION . Proposed Building Addition 1435 Forest Avenue S Carlsbad, California V Dear Torn: V - V In accordance with your request, we have performed a foundation investigation, at the subject property. ..- Our investigation was performed in November-December, 1987 and consisted of subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and the preparation of this report.' The purpose of, our invest igation was to evaluate the property with respect togeotechnical conditions, and to provide foundation recommendations for the' proposed'building V addition. SITE VDESCRIPTION ' V The subject relatively level property, 'located at 1435 For est Avenue , ih' Carlsbad,' California, presently supports 'a one-story, Vwood-frame and stucco, ' single-family ' residence ' founded on conti'nuou& per imeter footings. and interior spread footings with V raised-wood floors. An enclosed concrete slab patio has been constructed Vat the rear of the residence, and an -asphalt concrete driveway along the 'east side of the lot 'provides access to a detached *garage structure located at the rear of the residence. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed - additio& to the es'idence will consist of an additional ground floor bedioorn located'at t,he rear of the existing V residence where the -existing patio slabis located, and a second- story located over the southest portion of the residence (see Plot Plan, Figure 1). We understand that relatively light, wood-frame construction will be. utilized for the addition. The proposed ground-level will be supported by newand existing footings-and will have' ',raised-wood floors. The second-story will also be Supported by new and existing footings. 5245 AVENIDA ENCINAS • SUITE G • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 931-1917 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Project No. 211.1 December 9, 1987 Page .- SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Subsurface. exploration consisted of excavating four test pits to 'depths ranging from. 3-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet. The test pits were excavated: manually. . The locations of the test pits are -indicated on the Plot Plan, Figure 1. .. . . . The. 'subsurface exploration was supervied by an engineer from. this office' who logged the soils and obtained bulk and undisturbed drive samples for-laboratory testing. . , The soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Clas'si'fications are shown on the Test Pit' Logs, Figures2 and.3. .. . The following laboratory tests were performed: . . o 'Dry 'Density and Moisture Content . . (ASTM: D 2216) o-Dir'ect Shear . . . (ASTM: D 3080) Results of dry density and .moisture content determinations 'ate shown, on the Test Pit Logs. The-direct shear test results.'are presented on Figure '4. . . . SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . . . The soils encountered in the .test pits were undisturb'ed natural deposits. . The soils consisted generally of moist, medium dense silty 'sand, underlain. by moist,-dense..;si'1ty sand. ''No groundwater was encountered in the 'test pits, nor did any caving occur. -' As determined ''in the testi pits, the depths 'o'f the existi'iig continuous perimeter.foo'tings vary from 21 -1" tO 3'-6" below lowest: adjacent grade, and the interior spread footings äre .generàlly founded 18. inches below adjacent.grade... . . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . Based on • the results of,our investigation,' the proposed building additions to the existing ' reidence are feasible from a geotechniical standpoint. 'HETHER!NGTON ENGINEERING, INC. h,1 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION ... Project No. 211.1 •. December 9, 1987 Page 3. The proposed ' building addition may be supported..by.new:and/or existing continuous/spread footings founded at least 24-inches below ,*lowest adjacent grade. Use,- df.the..existing 18-,inch -deep interior spread footings to support additional loads is not recommended. Footinsfounded s recommended 'may be designed for a dead plus' Jive load bearing value of.2000 pounds per square. foot. This value may: be increased by one-third for loads inc1uding 'wind or seismic . forces. A lateral bearing value of 200 pounds Per square foot per'foot of -depth and a coefficientóf friction between foundation soil and concrete of 0A may be assumed New continuous footings. should be reinforced with two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom. Footing excavations for •new.footings should'be inspècted by the Geotechnical Engineer to ensure that they are founded in suitable-bearing materials.. . If there are any questions regarding this repot., please feélfree to call. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, •• • HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INCOF ESS/ov - . • Z3 No. 3048 D. ETHER GTON •0 Geät nical •Engineer 397 \ • CIVIL • • (bo h expire 3/30/88) MDH/ss • • .• • • . • • • • • copies: 2-Addressee • • • • . 2-96bert J. Royce, A.I.A. . •.• - • HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC NOR -. SCALE: I LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATION TP-4 OF TEST PIT CONCRETE FLATWORK PLOT PLAN HETHERINOTON ENG1NEERING WORTH RESIDENCE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO 211 1 FIGURE NO Earthworks of BACKHOECOMPANY: San Diego BUCKET SIZE: Hand Pits DATE: 11/9/87 TEST PIT NO. i ELEVATION - IU ILØC) cc co ' -- . - !z.._J co * . 0 0 ._____20 j . . SOIL DESCRIPTION SM - - Brown silty sand, moist; loose 90.4 15.2 M Brown slightly silty sand, moist to wet, medium dense - 107.0 8.9 '\ - - - . Red-brown slightly silty sand, moist, medium dense - 106 10.1 SM at4',-becomes dense 118.9 9.9 . - .. --- Total Depth i5 .'No Water -- - No Caving Footing Depth 28U below adjacent grade / - - p - + ..-- --.-- *--. - F •. . -- '... .++ 15---- . - .- - TEST PIT NO. 2 -.., . ELEVATION - o—•—. -- - —-,kM Brown silty sand, moist, loose to iredium dense >< >< 93.9 . 5.7. S1 Brown sand, moist, medium dense . . - •. tree roots at 2'7611 . . . S 104:5 6.3 - Red-brown slightly silty sand, moist, medium dense >< 104.0 7.5 SM at 4' becomes dense >< )< 1187 85 6 116.7 8.5 ; + - . •- -- - . '•.. - - Total Depth 5 10 . . . No Water. No Caving • - - . . . . - Footing Depth 25w below 'adjacent grade - - 16----- • . -. - :- -:- - - LOGOFTESTPITS. - -- -S - HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING - - worth -Residence * GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS • - -- . -- - PROJECT NO. 211.1 FIGURE NO. 2 Earthworks of . P BACK HOE-COMPANY: San Diego BUCKET SIZE: Hand Pits DATE: 1.1 . co TEST PIT NO..3 ELEVATION - ° w U..m.zwoz .!z. o ki SOIL DESCRIPTION SM Brown silty sand1 rnoist, loose to medium dense 104.2 11.7 >< Brown and red-brown slightly, silty sand, very moist, - 90.0 15.5 SM medium dense - . tree roots at 2-6" 99.1 16.4 SM Red-brown slightly silty sand, ver moistmedium >< 1071 110 dense 6— - - at 4'-9"-becomes dense- - - Total Depth 51 -3 No Water - No Caving 10— • - 15— TEST PIT. NO. '4 ELEVATION- 0--- - Footing Depth 3'-6" below adjacent grade • • . . --. ••- . •l•• .• - S •' '-• • .•- , S .• . - • 6—. . . •. •.. - •., S. •- •'. S__ . . - - - - - Total Depth 4' • . . -. •'. . :. NoWater- No Caving 10- 16— • . • - ., .. LO3 OF TEST PITS: - HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING - Worth Residence GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS . • . .- PROJECT NO.. 211.1 - FIGURE NO. 3 V bOO 1000 1bOU 1UUU - bUU 3000 NORMAL PRESSURE (PSF) SYMBOL SAMPLE LOCATION - ,COHESION (psf) FRICTION ANGLE (0) REMARKS: • TP-2 @1' 0 41 - Remoided.to100 pcf at 10.8%, ,saturated DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING worth Residence GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 211.1 • FIGURE NO. 4