HomeMy WebLinkAbout144 REDWOOD AVE; ; CB980189; Permit--loso'
ft.- 7tc)
B U I L D I N G P E R M I T Permit No: CB980189
04/17/98 08:20 - Project No: A9800251
Page 1 of 1 Development No:
Job Address: 144 REDWOOD AV Suite:
Permit Type: SINGLE FAMILY DWLNG - DETACHED 6117 04/17/98 0001 01 02
Parcel No: 204-252-10-00 Lot#: CPRMT 1593500
Valuation: 227,263 Construction Type: VN
Occupancy Group: Reference#: Status: ISSUED
Description: 2616 SF+890 GAR+160 DECK Applied: 01/23/98
Apr/Issue: 04/17/98
Entered By: RMA
Appl/Ownr : P & G CONSTRUCTION 760 729-7447
P.O. BOX 2518
VISTA CA 92085
*** Fees Required es.çllected & Credits
Fees: 16,638.9.A
Adjustments: /bo
?m9rrs
'ëditS. .00
Total Fees: 16,6.0O Total i\ 703.00
/ B4 e3te: \ 15,935.00
Fee description / n Ext fee Data
Number of Bedrooms /. ZZ./ . . > 3 3.00
Number of Bathroomsj. .. .••. 2.75
Building Permit I I •• * I 1088.00
Plan Check 707.00
Strong Motion Fee ( ( /) •23.00
Enter UU to Autocaic P.F.-'JJ/I Iti.'\'/I I 4136.00 Y
(PF C . F . DVN Ji J" / / 3818.00
Autocal T.I.F. 395.00 :: ::; & lb / 2400.00 :5/8
Enter "Y" for / 20.00 Y
Each Plumbing Fixture or TrJ ,-. \) 00 126.00
Each Building Sewer // 0 ,(5.00 15.00
Each Install/Repair Water Li LI 1 ..-" 7.00 7.00
Each Water Heater and/or Vent * 7.00 7.00
Gas Piping,System > 1 7.00 7.00
Each Vacuum Breaker > 2 7.00 14.00
Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > 10.00 Y
Single Phase Per AMP > 200 .25 50.00
Enter 'V for Mechanical Issue Fee> 15.00 Y
'Install Furn/Ducts/Heat, Pumps > 2 9.00 18.00
Each Install Fireplace 7 ------I -- C-10 •-.-.---
Each Exhaust Fan '> FI' ' IAI 19. 0
PLDA A > iqrr'rr,. I1L86. 0 H
Construct Housing(Y/N)? > 4 çp' Y
Enter Impact Fee
-
N3 DA1!I °
CLEARANCE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161
an'ce uj:
ts
c— I -79Ooz
cc; A-- InSO-7(p SEWER PERMIT
04/17/98 08:15
Page 1. of I
Job Address: 144 REDWOOD AV Suite:
Permit Type: SEWER - RESIDENTIAL I Parcel No: 204-252-10-00
Permit No: SE980026
Bldg PlanCk#: CB980189
6118 04/17/98 0001 01 0 C-PRPIT 4324..00
Description: 2616 SF+890 GAR+160 DECK
Permitee: P & G CONSTRUCTION
P.O. BOX 2518
VISTA CA 92085
Status: ISSUED
Applied: 02/23/98
Apr/Issue: 04/17/98
760 729-7447 Expired:
Prepared By: DR
*** Fees Required *** * Fe
--------------------------------- Fees: 4,324.
Adjustments: .00/'\
Total Fees: 4,3 .00) Tota
Ej
Fee description
___!!____
Enter Number of Units Total EDUs c- /
Sewer Fee f Enter Sewer EDUs an
1;;!
Are
Enter "Y" for Later 1
* SEWER TOTAL It
ollected & Credits
.00
.00
4,324.00
Ext fee Data
---------------
1.00
1.00
1824.00
NA
2500.00 Y
4324.00
'FINAL APPROVAL
INSP., _ DATELVVVV
V CLEARANCE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161
MI
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009
(760)-438-1161
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO.8 6I8?
EST. VAL.' IF
Plan Ck. Deposit /
A 703
I '-1 'f J&5P 4)b (J.
Address tinclude Bldg/Suite #) Business 1A1ts4J5 Name (at this address)
/ /%'7kP I7'f7 /~7J
Legal Des cri tion Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units
(nc, le 116111111.
Assessors Parcel # Existing Use ((, 2
Psed Use
4 Description f Wk 1 SO. F #of Stories It of Bedrooms It of B throoms
Name Address . City State/Zip Telephone # Fax It
Name Address ' City State/Zip Telephone #_
Name Address . City State/Zip Telephone #
_________
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
examptiom Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001).
a- rezci-/ pz? Re. B) &Z YzIrf Cit ?,2OS
Namel Address City State/Zip Telephone It
State License It ..5' License Class S City Business License It
Designer Name . Address City State/Zip -. Telephone -
State License It
- - - - -: Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which .this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company Six& Policy No. _J_.3.9.-,97 ilsiJ'1701f Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS)
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000), In ad tion the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE DATE /c23 -98
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: .
0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or imprâves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). . . . .
0 I am exempt under Section
-
Business and Professions Code for this reason:
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO
I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. ,
. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number contractors license number):
I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number):
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address phone number/ type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
TT I
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
L'CONSTRUCTION LENDING'AGENCY
1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________
I certify that I have read the application and ,state thatthe above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cite' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT
OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null' and void if the building or
work authorized by such permit is not commenced within -365 days from the date of Such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended
or abandânedat any time after the WOJ:5 comrnencedjq.a perjd of 189 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE •• -.5.4;'r) -(4i_ . DATE
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
117
CITY OF CARLSBAD
INSPECTION REQUEST
PERMIT# CB980189 FOR 09/30/98
DESCRIPTION: 2616 SF+890 GAR+160 DECK
TYPE: SFD
JOB ADDRESS: 144 REDWOOD AV
APPLICANT: P & G CONSTRUCTION PHONE:
CONTRACTOR: PHONE:
OWNER: PHONE:
REMARKS: C/GARTH/ AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE INS
SPECIAL INSTRUCT:
INSPECTOR AREA PD
PLANCK# CB980189
0CC GRP
CONSTR. TYPE VN
STE: LOT:
760 729-7447
TOTAL TIME:
--RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS
5E980026 SWRSD ISSUED
RW980093 ROW ISSUED
CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS
19 ST Final Structural
29 PL Final Plumbing
39 EL Final Electrical
49 ME Final Mechanical
19 ST Final Structural
29 PL Final Plumbing
39 EL Final Electrical
49 ME Final Mechanical
***** INSPECTION HISTORY *****
DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS
092498 Final Combo NR PD NEED DEPTS APPROVAL
092298 Final Combo CO PD
082598 Interior Lath/Drywall AP DH INT LATH-SHOWERS
071698 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PD
071698 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PD
071698 Sewer/Water Service AP PD
071698 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PD
071598 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO PD
071598 Interior Lath/Drywall CO PD
070898 Insulation NR PD 9:30AM
070698 Rough Combo AP PD
070298 Rough Combo CO PD
063098 Rough Combo NR PD NOT WRAPPED
062998 Rough Combo NR PD NOT WRAPPED
061598 Shear Panels/HD's AP PD
061098 Shear Panels/HD's NR PD
061098 Roof/Reroof AP PD
042798 Service Change/Upgrade AP PD
042498 Rough Electric NR PD 8:25AM
042198 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD
Ear h Earth Technics -Ear
P.O. Box -891989 (909)696-5451
Temecula,
CLIENT Phtrhep -Job #izso2- Date_,S/z//98
91
Project Location: gecwaoe - Tract No.__________
Grading Permit No: Lot No.
Subject: cr- f 24.Z.5Z--olo
AtL crr(S tcp fUr(1D r OLDrA MNZ 1Acf -
S.L. CE,tiW s iE S I Li( sPn!D.
(I M oi c # M ,'4. 2-4 ( ' I C-' M IMCE
&uQ4 LoMM$OPflb, , ''-
ii PM7- / Ii4 S15Thtr7,?(.. .1
V4 1?t (v1jj rIP rrr2oF
-
-r pis.
By:.
ENGINEERING FILE . WHITE FIELD FILE . YELLOW JOB SUPERINTENDENT. PINK
FINAL BUILDING 3NSPECTION
DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE CMWD ST LITE
PLAN CHECK#: CB980189 DATE: 09/22/98
PERMIT#: CB980189 PERMIT TYPE: SFD
PROJECT NAME: 2616 SF+890 GAR+160 DECK
ADDRESS: 144 REDWOOD AV
CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/GARTH! AN PLEASE
SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA
INSPECTED DATE
BY: ______________ INSPECTED: RAO. APPROVED '' DISAPPROVED -
INSPECTED DATE
BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED -
INSPECTED DATE
BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED -. DISAPPROVED -
COMMENTS:
FINAL BUILDING INSPECTI ,--2
DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING ,ãib ST LITE
PLAN CHECK#: CB980189 DATE: 09/25/98
PERMIT#: CB980189 PERMIT TYPE: SFD
PROJECT NAME: 2616 SF+890 GAR+160 DECK - 7'
ADDRESS: 144 REDWOOD AV Lot# L SEP2518
CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/GARTH c..
SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA L
------------------------------------------------------------- :::__ I
INSPECTED DATE
BY: TffNGW INSPECTED: Y2&-? APPROVED J DISAPPROVED -
INSPECTED DATE
BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED -
INSPECTED DATE
BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED -
COMMENTS:
EsGil Corporation
in Partnership with government for Bui1suing Safety
DATE: March 31, 1998
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-189
PROJECT ADDRESS: 144 Redwood Ave.
PROJECT NAME: SFD for Lantz
SET: II
U LICANT
JURIS
U PLAN REVIEWER
U FILE
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially, comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff;
The plans transmitted herewith .have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted:
(by: )
Fax In Person
By: Bert Domingo
Egil Corporation
OGA [I CM DEJ D'PC
Telephone #:
Fax #:
Enclosures:
3/24/98
Date contacted:
Mail Telephone
LII REMARKS:
trnsmtidot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax(619)560-1576
EsGil Corporation
Trof6sionafTlan Review Engineers
DATE: February 4, 1998
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-189
PROJECT ADDRESS: 144 Redwood Ave.
PROJECT NAME: SFD
SET:I
13 APPLICANT
JURI
LAN REVIEWER
FILE
E The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department
staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgi.I
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Garth Packard
2057 Chestnut Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant (except by mail) that the plan check has
been completed.
El Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax. #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
0 REMARKS:
By: Bert Domingo Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 Pc 1/26/98 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-189 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 144 Redwood Ave.
FLOOR AREA: 2616 STORIES: TWO
HEIGHT: 24 FT. Approx.
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: February 4, 1998
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/26/98
PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state
laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan
review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other
corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering
Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the
following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994
UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions
adopted by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r310rw.dot
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
S PLANS
Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of
prints, to:
Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California
92123, (619) 560-1468.
2. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of
this project, including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section
106.3.3:
FIRE PROTECTION
3. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup:
Inside each bedroom.
Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms.
On each story.
In the basement, if part of the dwelling unit.
When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to
the stair.
In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have
a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway.
NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarmaudible in all sleeping areas of the unit.
Section 31 0.9.1.
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
4. Window area must be at least 1/10 of the floor area and a minimum of 10 square
feet per Section 1203.3. See Master Bed Room.
5. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in
the laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not
provided. Section 1203.3.
6. Glazing in the following locations, should be of safety glazing material in accordance
with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions):
a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge
of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a
closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less
than 60 inches above the walking surface.See window 23 on the second
floor.
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
7. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1006.4:
a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point
12 inches from where the treads are narrowest.
. ROOFING
8. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or
specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section
106.3.3:
Manufacturer's name.
Model name/number.
C) ICBO approval number, or equal.
9. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic
area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or
cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3.
10. Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with
corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dih,ension."
Section 1505.3.
. GARAGE AND CARPORTS
11. All elements supporting floor above garage, including thewalls supporting floor
joists and the beams, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage
side. Section 302.2.
12. Provide an 18" raised platform for any FAU, water heater, or other device in the
garage which may generate a flame or spark. UMC Section 308, UPC Section
510.1.
FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
13. The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for
this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as
required to show compliance: See page 7 under Foundation design and
Concrete Slabs- on- Grade.
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
. FRAMING.
Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the
maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be
provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other
readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the
opening. Section 1505.1.
. MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
Show the size, location and type of all heating and cooling appliances or
systems.
. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL 'CODE)
Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with 1993 NEC Art.
210-52(c), which reads as follows:
In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be
installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches. Receptacles shall be
installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured
horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space. Island and peninsular
countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle
for each four feet of counter top. Counter top spaces separated by range tops,
refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top spaces.
Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with 1993 NEC Art.
210-52(h), which reads as follows:
For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be
required.
PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0.
Provide adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage. An 18"
platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement. UPC, Section
510.3.
Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to
exterior. UPC, Section 608.5.
Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide
two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the
'tank). UPC, Section 510.0
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
. ENERGY CONSERVATION
Please show on plans where the double pane are located per energy
calculation.
MISCELLANEOUS
Uplift may be a problem for the roof system above the decks and longer eaves.
Please provide hurricane ties or submit calculation.
Please check the deflection of the cantilevered joists with and without the post
load. Submit calculation.
Provide stability analysis for the 7 ft. high wall (free standing) to accommodate 5
lbs. per sq.ft. lateral load.
Please show drag collector to transfer loads to the following shear-walls and
submit calculation.
a) Along lines A, I ,and 2.
Please show the capacity of the shear walls on the plans. Also include the
required anchor bolts size and spacings for the foundation and required nailings
for the sill plates on the second floor.
Please X- reference the shear transfer detail to the framing plans.
Show recommended shear wall along line 3 on the roof level.
Show recommended uplift straps for the shear walls on the second floor on the
framing plans.
Show how the floor joists are framed at the stairs area.
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
a) Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction
list? Please indicate:
Yes L3 No
The jurisdiction has contracted with. Esgil .Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number
of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 98-189
February 4, 1998
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-189
PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo DATE: February 4, 1998
BUILDING ADDRESS: 144 Redwood Ave.
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R 3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N
BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA
(ft.2)
VALUATION
MULTIPLIER
VALUE
($)
HOUSE 2616 78 204,048.00
GARAGE 890 22 19,580.00
DECK 160 Ii 1,760.00
FP (METAL) 1 1875 1,875.00
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 227,263.00
1991 UBC Building Permit Fee U Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1087.50
1991 UBC Plan Check Fee LI Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 706.88
Type of Review: LI Complete Review L1 Structural Only LI Hourly
LI Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Other:
Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 565.50
Comments:
Sheet I of I
macvalue.doc 5196
City of Carlsbad
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE: 2 -'c PLANCHECKNO.: CB
BUILDING ADDRESS: /44 JZD\#c/'c , 13 _AV.:,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'Sir—i9 L st—'iL 1--z-m-e)q t— C.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Z'4 -52-.- itO . EST. VALUE:ç3
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
Please s he ttached report of deficiencies
marked w 0. ke necessary corrections to plans
or specL ons for compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review.
1 Q. Date: 22-3-s
By: Date:
By: Date:
-
WR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORlA1tON-0iSSUE BUILDING PERMIT
By: C4L) Date:
ATTACHMENTS
. ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Dedication Application Name: David Rick
Dedication Checklist City of Carlsbad
Improvement Application
Improvement Checklist
Future Improvement Agreement
Grading Permit Application
Grading Submittal Checklist
Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009
Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4324
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots-
Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation:
Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet
Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4
PIandie CksI BCO1 Fcnn DR.doc
Rev.9131972075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9h1576. (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
5
!Kz
A. Drainage Patterns
Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
0 3. Include on title sheet:
W
L4 orth Arrow VD. Property Lines
xisting & Proposed Structures 1.1 Easements
existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Driveway widths
2: Show on site plan:
Site address
) Assessor's Parcel Number
9 Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPL!ANCE
4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No.
0 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
LASPAtSSYS%UBRARYNG\WORDbOCSCHKLS'flBiámg Pffinthedi CIUsI BP000I Fan,, OR.dac Rev. 913197
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST/ 2ND/ 3RD/
U U U
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ I C, ' , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
U U U 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $ F(J21 D, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: • Date:
U U U 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recentaperty title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of O so
we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit..
-
Future public improvements required as follows:
PIan,edi Cklsl BP000I Form ORdOC Rev. 913197
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1s 2'' 3rd"
U U U 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement.. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Future Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
U U U 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
/ The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
" utOn adequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Write
"No Grading" on plot plan if none is required.
U U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:
U U U 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
U U U 7d. No Grading Permit required.
U U U 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
U / U 8. ARIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for: a4rci L
PIrnithck Cldst 9P000I Fonn OR.doc Rev. 913197
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
stl 2nd/ 3rd/
gimmm_mi
A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The
fee is noted in the fees section on the following page.
INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your busihess enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for
assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
LI .1 Al 11. NPDES PERMIT
7/1
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface poflutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
o
:=d 12. fees are attached
0 No fees required
rece,d 4"t S.'ia
ACt eplrj
Pantheck csl BPVOOI Foim DR.dOC Rev. 913197
"1-
14'r
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
C3 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
O Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: / L-JLj SPJLJ0DCJ Atp1 . Bldg. Permit No.C2 C19-
Prepared by:t. Date: 2. 23 T Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: $f ec. Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's:
ADT CALCULATIONS List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: S Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's:
FEES REQUIRED:
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED: tis 0 NO (See Building Department for ar9Jnt)
WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) QNO
01. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA:
FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: = $____________
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
ADT's/UNITS: X FEEIADT: = $<3570 ___________
BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE
ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:_________
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:.
7/ UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:________
D' 5. SEWER FEE
PERMIT No.
EDU's: 1 X FEE/EDU:I, 'a)f = $_f,, ZLt
BENEFIT AREA: A'fr- DRAINAGE BASIN:_______
EDU's: X FEE/EDU:
DRAINAGE FEES PLDA Pr : HIGH ./ /LOW______
/ ACRES: X FEE/AC: 6 s 3
0' 7. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =s '20 S'00
TOTAL OFABOVEFEES*: $ S
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
P: DOCSMISFORMSBP0O02.FRM REV 01/22/97
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB Address ff((&00'd 4,r
Planner 14 f)'(4.e_t_. Phone (619) 438-1161, extension
APN: Lf
Type of Project & Use: Net Prqject Density: DU/AC
Zoning:R"3 General Plan: Facilities Facilities Management Zone: / CFD (in/out) #Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ Circle One
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit:
Legend: Z Item Complete 0Item Incomplete - Needs your action
Environmental Review Required: YES N
,
9k2 TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION: ________
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Discretionary Action Required: YES NQ" TYPE CP
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO. Cf>P r6c'6
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of. Approval:____________________________________________________
El Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO____
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO____
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at
- 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego C111,11 80316
Determine statu (Coastal Permit Requ`ire!!.spr Exempt): coe poamyaD
Coastal Permit Det a 1-oh al dy completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. (
Coast-al Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal: Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination' Log as needed.
D /nclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of inciusionary Housing Ordina,ce - May 2( 1993)
Data Entry Completed? YES NO (Enter CB #; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing YIN; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule for amount); Return)
Site Plan:
0 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
* street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
0 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
i.iu Zoning:
1. Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Required
Required
Required
Required
___________
Shown
Shown
Shown -
Shown /O'
2. Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: Requir Shown
Interior
ShownStreet
S equired
Required ..
Shown
Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown
440 3. Lot Coverage: Required Shown L
&A0
Height: Required Shown
Parking: Spaces Required
______________ Shown g
Guest Spaces Required Shown '
.il i .. S . S • .:::.:iiI.Oay4 EMMA
/
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER
DATE_________
EarPechnics
PREUMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Single - Lot, Residential Development
A.P.N. 204-252-010
14 Redwood Avenue
Carlsbad, California
November 18, 1997
PROJECT NO. 97235-01
PREPARED FOR:
Mr. William Lantz
2844 Wilson Street
Carlsbad, California 92008
Earth Technics P.O. Box 891989, Temecula, California 92589 (909) 699-5451
November 18, 1997 Project No. 97235-01
At your request, we have performed a Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation for the above referenced site. The purpose of our
investigation was to evaluate the underlying soil conditions with
respect to the proposed development and to assess the geologic
and engineering constraints that might exist considering this
development.
No current grading plans were available for our review, but a 8-
scale Plot Plan was used to locate the proposed house and
appurtenances. Plate 1 presents the lot configuration and
Geotechnical data obtained during our field investigation.
ACCOMPANYING MAPS, ILLUSTRATIONS AND APPENDICES
Index Map - (2000-scale) - Page 2
Geotechnical Nap - (10-scale) - Plate 1
Regional Fault Map - (1" = 20 miles) - Plate 2
Appendix A - Geotechnical Trench Logs
Appendix B - Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Appendix C - General Earthwork and Grading Specifications
Appendix D - References
INDEX. MAP .
SCALE feet : .. ...
INDEX HAP
- OF .
0.12 +1- ACRES, REDWOOD AVENUE•
A.P.N. 204-252-010
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
SOURCE: U.S.G.S. 7½ MIN. QUAD SAN LUIS REY 1968. (PR 1975)
97235-01
Page 3
SITE LOCATION/CONDITIONS
The 0.12+/- acre rectangular site fronts on Redwood Avenue
approximately 450 feet north of Carlsbad Boulevard, both paved
streets in the city of Carlsbad. Existing single-family
residences are located to the north and east, an alley and
apartment complex to the west, and Redwood Avenue forms the
southern boundary.
No previous grading was performed on the lot, and the essentially
flat lot remains in natural condition.
Overall relief is less than 3 feet descending to the southwest.
The entire lot is perimeter-fenced with chain and wood fencing,
and a small storage shed is located in the northeast corner.
The site is essentially free of any vegetation as a result of
conscientious weed abatement.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
According to discussion with the general contractor, the site
will be utilized for a 2-story single family residence of 2-3
bedrooms with attached garage.
No grading is necessary to improve the lot or provide lot
drainage.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of our investigation included the following:
A review of available data pertinent to the site, both
published and in-house unpublished data.
Subsurface exploration of the site utilizing 2 exploratory
trenches to depths as great as 6.1 feet. The trenches were
logged, and these logs appear in Appendix A of this report.
Sand cone tests were performed at critical depths in the
trenches to. determine in-place densities. Representative
bulk samples were obtained for testing.
Laboratory testing of representative earth materials to
develop soil engineering parameters for the proposed
development.
Preparation of this report presenting our findings,
conclusions and recommendations concerning site development
based upon an engineering analysis of geologic and
geotechnical properties of the subsoils as determined by
field and laboratory evaluation.
97235-01
Page 4
LABORATORY TESTING
The following tests were performed for this project in our
laboratory in accordance with the American Society for Testing
and Materials, the State of California Standard Specifications or
contemporary practices of the soil engineering profession.
Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determinations
This test determines the density that a soil can be compacted to
at various contents. For each soil moisture, there is a maximum
dry density obtained and the associated optimum moisture content.
The results are used to evaluate the natural compaction, control
of the grading process and as an aid in developing the soil
bearing capacity. This is based on ASTM Standard D1557-78 (five
layer method).
In-Situ Moisture and Density
These tests consisted of performing sand cone tests (ASTM D1556-
64) within the trenches to determine in-place moisture and
density. The results are used to analyze the consistency of the
subsoils and aid in determining the necessary grading to prepare
the pad area.
Sieve Analysis
This test determines the material grading of the individual
particle sizes and is used in generating an engineering
classification.
Expansion Testing
The expansion index of the soils are determined by the U.B.C.
Method 29-2 and is used to design foundations for anticipated
expansion forces.
Direct Shear
A direct shear strength test was performed on a representative
sample of the on-site soils remolded to 90% relative compaction.
To simulate possible adverse field conditions, the sample was
saturated prior to shearing. A saturating device was used which
permitted the samples to absorb moisture while preventing volume
change. This test is used to determine soil strengths for slope
stability evaluations and for foundation bearing capacity.
97235-01
Page 5
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Below a depth of 4-6 inches, the entire lot is underlain by the
silty to clean fine sandstone representing an older marine
terrace (Kennedy, 1977). The Quaternary terrace consisted of
vague thin beds with average thickness of 1-2 inches. A
distinctive older paleosol is present between 12-15 inches
consisting of clayey sand.
In-place densities for the terrace were very high even at shallow
depths. Densities ranged from 107.4 pcf (91.2% relative
compaction) in T-1 at 1.1-1.5 feet, to 108.6 pcf (92.9% relative
compaction) in T-1 at 2.0-2.4 feet. Moistures were moderate from
5-6 percent. Optimum moisture is 9.4 percent for the sandier
portions.
GROUND WATER
No ground water was encountered within the site to a depth of 5.6
feet on the lot. No seepage was observed in any of the cut or
fill slopes in the immediate area indicating spring activity.
Historic ground water is 85 feet in the area.
FLOODING
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the
County of San Diego, the site is not located within the
boundaries of a 100-year flood plain. The lot currently drains
via sheet flow to Redwood Avenue.
GEOLOGY
The entire site is underlain at depth by the silty sandstone and
fine sandstone of an older marine terrace (Weber, F.H., 1963;
Kennedy, 1977). This formation member is a marine sedimentary
deposit with low angle dips of less than 7 degrees oriented in a
N 30-35W direction No evidence of slope instability was observed
on the lot or adjoining areas.
The active off-shore trace of the Newport-Inglewood fault is
located approximately 4 miles to the southwest. The site is not
included within any State or County fault hazard zone.
97235-01
Page 6
SEISMIC SETTING/GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS
The regional seismic setting is shown on Plate 2. The nearest
active fault to the site is the Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon
fault located 2 miles southwest of the property (Hart, 1994). The
large size and proximity make this fault the design fault when
evaluation seismic hazards at the site. According to several
authors (Rockwell & Lamar, 1986: Kennedy, 1977) the Newport-
Inglewood/Rose Canyon fault has ruptured 2-3 times in the last
1,500 years with an estimated magnitude of 6.5. The 1933 Long
Beach beach earthquake occurred on this branch of the Newport-
Inglewood approximate 26 miles to the northwest.
TABLE 1
COMPARISON OF SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Maximum Peak Ground
Probable Acceleration
Fault Distance to site Earthquake (M) At Site (a)
Newport-Inglewood 2 Miles SW 6.5 0.39
Whittier 29.5 Miles NE 6.5 0.09
HISTORIC SEISMICITY
We have utilized the computer program titled EQ SEARCH (Blake
(1995) to assess historic activity at the site. Based on this
analysis, the maximum ground acceleration at the site from the
period of 1800 to present is 0.38g.
SEISMIC EXPOSURE
Although no precise method has been developed to evaluate the
seismic potential of a specific fault, the available information
on historic activity may be projected to estimate the future
activity of the fault. This is usually done by plotting the
historic activity in terms on number of events in a given time
interval versus magnitude of the event. Based on such plots,
recurrence intervals for earthquakes of given magnitudes may be
estimated. For this project the maximum probable or "design
earthquake" is defined by CDMG Note 43 at the maximum historical
event with a recurrence period of 100 years. We estimate the
maximum probable or "design :earthquake" for the Newport-Inglewood
fault to be 6.5 magnitude. This is in agreement with the
deterministic model by Blake, (1995).
97235-01
Page 7
SECONDARY SEISMIC HAZARDS
The dense nature of the underlying sedimentary bedrock coupled
with the depth to groundwater of over 80 feet in the area of the
proposed pad precludes such secondary seismic hazards as
liquefaction, lateral spreading or settlement of the ground the
house is being placed upon. No rockfall or landslide hazard
exists at the site.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Foundation Design
A strip and spread footing foundation system should provide an
adequate foundation for one and two-story buildings in this site.
All exterior footings should be founded a minimum of 24 inches
below adjacent finished grade for 1 & 2-story buildings.
Interior footings may be founded a minimum of 18 inches below
finished grade. When the footings are founded in a minimum of 2
feet of properly compacted fill or dense bedrock, an allowable
bearing capacity of 1800 psf for 12 inch wide footings is
acceptable for dead plus live load. This value may be increased
by one-third for short term wind and seismic loading conditions.
When foundations are placed in natural soils, no cobbles over 6
inches should be left within the base of the foundation. A
typical foundation design is included in Appendix C. One No. 4
bar top and bottom is recommended as a minimum design.
Settlement
Our subsurface investigation revealed that the terrace below a
depth of 4-6 inches is dense. Footings should experience less
than 1-inch settlement with less than 1/2 inch differential
settlements between adjacent footings of similar
sizes and loads. This settlement is based upon grading of up to
30+ feet of fill. If thicker fills are proposed, settlement
could be greater and should be evaluated prior to placement.
Concrete Slabs-On-Grade
Sufficient fine-grained materials exists within near surface
earth materials to possible create moisture problems. Therefore,
we recommend that a moisture barrier be placed under any concrete
slabs that might receive a moisture-sensitive floor covering.
97235-01
Page 8
This moisture barrier should consist of a 6-mil polyethylene
vapor barrier sandwiched between a 2-inch layer of sand, top and
bottom, to prevent puncture of the barrier and enhance curing of
the concrete. Nominal reinforcement of the slabs with 10
inch by 10 inch, 10 gauge/ 10 gauge welded wire fabric is
advisable.
Expansive Soils-Slabs/Concrete Flatwork Design
Expansion testing of near-surface soils (T-i 0-3 feet) indicate
the near surface soils have a low expansion potential. The garage
and footing requirements are shown in Appendix C. Concrete
flatwork should, at a minimum have 10/10 x 10/10 welded fire
fabric for reinforcement. Flatwork adjacent to moisture sources,
such as pools, or planters, should consider 6/6 x 6/6 welded wire
fabric.
Earthwork Shrinkage and Subsidence
No grading is currently proposed, however, any grading will
result in a bulking of 5-7% of the bedrock when replaced as
compacted fill.
Retaining Wall Design
Retaining walls should be designed using the following
parameters:
Active pressure (level backfill) 47 lb/ft /ft
Active pressure (2:1 backfill) 57 lb/ft /ft
Active pressure (1 1/2:1 backfill) 62 lb/ft/ft
For purpose of lateral resistance , a value of 0.30 may be used
for frictional resistance. A value of 275 lb/ft /ft may be used
for passive resistance for footings placed into properly
compacted fill. Frictional and passive resistance may be
combined, provided the later is reduced by one-third.
Special loads for dead plus actual loads whould be considered in
the driveway/parking area that is retained.
Lateral Loads
Lateral loads in the near-surface soils are:
Active - 47 pounds per square foot of soil depth (psf/ft)
At Rest - 62 psf/ft
Passive - 275 psf/ft (for wood shoring)
350 psf/ft (for concrete footings)
97235-01
Page 9
Active means movement of the structure away from the soil; at
rest means the structure does not move relative to the soil (Such
as a loading dock); and Passive means the structure moves into
the soil. The coefficient of friction between the bottom of the
footings and the native soil may be taken as 0.30.
Trench Stability
The near-surface soil to a depth of 5 feet should stand
vertically when excavated, however, trenches in excess of 5 feet
in depth should have the sides laid back at 1:1 in accordance
with OSHA requirements.
Slope Stability
There are no existing slopes on the site, The high strength
values allow 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) cut and fill slopes up
to 15 feet without gross instability. Southwest facing cut slopes
could require buttressing.
Selection of Shear Strength Parameters
The following shear strength parameter utilized for our slope
stability analysis was determined by our laboratory test results
as presented below:
Material Friction Angle Cohesion
(Cut or Fill) (Degree) lb/ft2
Anticipated On-Site Fill 25 110
We have utilized values of 25 degrees and 110 lb/ ft2 for bedrock
cut slopes although it represents a conservative number,
determined from a remolded saturated sample. Bedrock is expected
to be 20% + stronger (Coduto, 1989).
Even more critical to overall cut slope performance is the
orientation of joints, fractures and bedding. The underlying
older marine terrace has no planes of weakness, and is oriented
in a favorable low dip configuration.
97235-01
Page 10
Drainage and Terracing
Drainage and terracing should be in accordance with Uniform
Building Code Chapter 70 requirements. At no time should water
be diverted onto the slope face in an uncontrolled and erosive
fashion. Rapid erosion and rutting of the fill slopes is
possible and they should be planted with drought resistant
landscaping as soon as possible.
GENERAL SITE GRADING
Clearing and Grubbing
The site is currently "weed-free" and no site preparation is
required prior to digging the footings.
Preparation of Building Pad Areas
The existing cut pad is sufficiently dense in its present
configuration and will not require preparation of existing soils
prior to footing and slab construction.
Preparation of Surface to Receive Compacted Fill
All sufficiently dense (90 percent relative compaction) surfaces
which are to receive compacted fill should be scarified to a
depth of 6 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content and
compacted to 90 percent relative compaction. Other softer areas
must be overexcavated to sufficiently dense material and
recompacted. This would include raising existing fill grades.
Typical overexcavation depths based on our field testing would be
1-2 feet. Actual depth of removal should be determined at the
time of grading by testing.
Placement of Compacted Fill
Compacted fill is defined as that material which will be replaced
in the areas of removal due to root removal, the placement of
footings and paving, and also wherever their grade is to be
raised. All fill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent
based upon the maximum density obtained in accordance with ASTM
D 1557-78 procedure. The area to be filled will be prepared in
accordance with the preceding section. The recompaction of the
cut material may be waived if field density tests indicate
densities in excess of compacted fill standards.
Fills placed on natural slopes of 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) or
steeper will require a key and benching as shown in Appendix C.
97235-01
Page 11
S. Pre-Job Conference
Prior to the commencement of grading, a pre-job conference should
be held with representatives of the owner, developer, contractor,
architect and/or engineer in attendance. The purpose of this
meeting shall be to clarify any questions relating to the intent
of the grading recommendations and to verify that the project
specifications comply with recommendations of this report.
Testing and Inspection
During grading, density testing should be performed by a
representative of the soil engineer in order to determine the
degree of compaction being obtained. Where testing indicates
insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be
applied with the adjustment of moisture content where necessary,
until 90 percent relative compaction is obtained.
Inspection of critical grading control procedures such as keys,
installation or need for subdrains should be made by a qualified
soils engineer or engineering geologist.
Development Impact
Provided the recommendations of this report are incorporated into
the design and construction of the residential project, both the
proposed development and off-site areas will be safe from
geologic and geotechnical hazards.
GENERAL
All grading should, at a minimum, follow the "Standard Grading
and Earthwork Specifications" as outlined in Appendix C, unless
otherwise modified in the text of this report. The
recommendations of this report are based on the assumptions that
all footings will be founded in dense, native, undisturbed
bedrock or properly compacted fill soil. All footing excavations
should be inspected prior to the placement of concrete in order
to verify that footings are founded on satisfactory soils and are
free of loose and disturbed materials and fill. All grading and,
fill placement should be performed under the testing and
inspection of a representative of the soil engineer.
97235-01
Page 12
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in
accordance with contemporary engineering principles and practice.
We make no warranty , either express or implied. Our
recommendations are based on an interpolation of soil conditions
between trench locations. Should conditions be encountered
during grading, that appear to be different than those indicated
by this report, this office should be notified.
Wz .
-U
C.E.G\\4
Regis t1x-28-98
OF
Larry Fast
R.C.E. 29150
Registration.
WLS/LF:ss
Distribution: (3) Addressee
1io
TIP
-a
EXPLANATION
Qt MARINE TERRACE
IHI•IIHIIIIH
EXPLORATORY TRENCH
•
1
.:
•
•
5, - . • .. -.
r 4PWObD
* • • • _______ • 01 • •
- .• • •
I
* •• .....•.•.•..
CMii
- • jecvwoop Ave
• .
C12 -Ol PLATE 1::
$ A\.N •B
e#XI
' •1 I
N...I907 I I
AIN
10
I
Ift PINTO L?I I
1918
\
R
Alms
-. 1899 M7+
1 jEfl
1952
10
L Nt
1947
4252
M6.2
WSPRIF.
1916 \\ \
.......
1893
197
Pro
LT
- ANGELES 'h- ( r R1VERS16E
189.0
.'. 0 R A N G E LJ"% \ i \ ELSINORE
'I 1812
onto
.........
Ia ..
SITE
MILES 1894
JL
)\
S A
son cow
Island e 1941
1856
MAJOR EARTHQUAKES and RECENTLY ACTIVE FAULTS
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION
L ANT z. - lWgooP AtIE Pm L3 ID A ID
W.O. NO: I DATE I FIGURE:
'31236 -0t
- I 11197 I PLATE
APPENDIX 'A
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL TRENCH LOG
Project Name - Elevation i
. bench No.
Project Number Equipment
- - - -
I
-
b
-
GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
9 E3
I Logged by iN. LS4IYb .Date IA Sampled by
VAP
's b1.4 5,3 MderM,uvtt ¶tYvzicQ.-. ',edig vQ r tyJiL Y •
4 %%(.1/4 _1/ ;l-
. fin'or .VM co A Ile 7.°SV4.
bk p#J. lc l2. 5" -ti4Mh ±
\
tut (io/)art d r
10- \ 1.
• :
\
_cs17_ •
— -
1:..
--
+er'/ £4
GRAPHIC LOG
— —
. trend—
-- scale: is
Symbols
• . .. . . B- Bulk Sample
R- Ring Sampie
.SC, Bond Cons, .
MD' Maximum Density
-. . GS- Grain Slzs
-
. . . . SE Band 'Equivalent
-. • E1 Eipatss!on Index • . -
. ____________ (90) Relative Compaction
• :' :.: : Earth
I ' • •
. technics I I . .: I I
•
4
GEOTECHNICAL TRENCH LOG
Project Name Lk,fT Elevation : Trench No. Project Number 9 -o i.• Equipment 0,16 590 LQEtt
— -
I
- - -
GEOTEHNICAL DESCRIPTION
I I
Olt I Loggedby
Date 11/6/47
Sampled by
o fde Mh&v,um - SAA T - - orl
5- -5
: i/N0t1iij
10-
GRAPHIC LOG trend— scale: 1
Test Symbols
B • Bulk sample
R - Ring Bumpi.
IiI iii' SC - SndCoiis. lJiI Jill • - MD - Maximum Density
- GS- Grain SIzE
- SE Sand Equlva.nt
• .• - El - ExPa1$!afl Index
(90)- Relative Compaction
: •• • : Earth.
Ifill I I lI fill technics I I
LI
APPENDIX B
MAXIMUM DENSITY - OPTIMUM MOISTURE DETERMINATION
The maximum density was determined in accordance with ASTM
Standard D1557-78. The result by full laboratory curve is :
Sample Depth Maximum Optimum
Location (Feet) Soil Description Dry Density Moisture
T-1 0-3 (Soil Type A) Bedrock 117.8 9.4
yellowish-brown fine sand
with silt
SUMMARY OF EXPANSION TESTING
U.B.C. METHOD 29-2
Sample Location Depth Expansion Index Expansion Potential
T-1 0-3' 17 low
UI•IIIUIUU•••U•NUSI•IIUUIUUUU•U••U•UUU•I•UIU•UU.I....
.................U.U...........U.U.U.....I............
• ••••••••• ••••• ••uu iuuuui••• uuu •uumu •u••• u.ui iuii.i...
i..u.... U U UUIUUU• IUU• UUUUUU IUUiuUUU UU.iU.U.ia •••••u•.uU uu• •uu •u •uu•u••u ••••u.•u•• ...•••••• UUU••UU UUUUUUI•UU UU U U •UB•UU UUUURU UUUU UUUUUUIUU
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUUUUUUUUUUUIUUUUUUUUMUUUUU.UU.UU.UU... ..u..UU..UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUU...U.UN.........
u..UUU•UUUUUUUUUUUUUNUUUUUUUUUUUUUIUUUUUUUUUU•U.UU..URR..g. U..UU..U•UIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUBU.....
uII...I.UUIUIUUI•UUIUIUUUUUUIUUUCURUU.IUUU....aU..I..a.... .ui..U... .....0 U UUU IUUUUu•UUU U .u•.u.ui uu•
UUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUUUU•UUUU•UUUUUUUUUUUUUU.UUUUIUUU.UU.U... UUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUUUUUUIUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUIIUUUUUUIUUUU..U. UuU.•UU.uUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUUU•UUUUUUIUUuUUUIIUUUUuUUU .•uu••U.•UU•UUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUU•••UUUUUUUUU••.U.••u•.U.•••u. UUUUUUUUUUUIIIUUUUUUUUUIUUU•UUUUUUUUIUUUUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUIUU ...i...U.UUUUUUUUUUUIUU.UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUIIU.U..U....u...... UUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUU•UUUUUUUIUUU.UUURIUUU.UU.. iURUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
UIUUUUUIUUUUUUUUUUIUUUUU•UUUIIIIBIUUUUUIUUSUUUUUIMUUIUUUU.
IUUIUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUUUUUUUIUUIUIUUUUUUUUUIUUUUU.UIUUU...m .........UUUUUUUUUIUUUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.I.U...u.m.a,. s..i...u.U..UU.UUUUUIUUUUBUU.UIU..UI.UUUUU..u......u.u. ••UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUURUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUIUUBUUU ••Uu••uUuUU$UUUUU•UUUUUUUIUUU•IUUUUUUU.IUU•UU•.BUUUuuU•m
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPUUUUUUU.*UU..
...l....u.UUU.URUUUUUUUUUUUU.UURUUUr1P.U......U..a.u..
U........uUU•UUUUUUU•UUU•UUUUUUUUUUUUUuUUU.UUU•.Uue. UUUUUUUUIUUUIUUUUIIUUUUIUUUUUUBPUUUIIUURUUUUUUaVau EUUUUUUU•UUUUUUUU•U•UUUUUUUUUUtUUUUUUUUIUUU•UUUUUU•U.0 ...UUUU.UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UUUUUPUUUUUUUU•UUUUURU.UUU.UU..0 u..uu.U.,uuU.U.UU,UU.UUUUUPIUU.UIRUIiUU.UUUUiuuuim
UUUUUUUI.UIIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPlUUIUUUUUUUUIIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
UUUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPlUIUUUUUUUUUUUUIUUUUUURUUUUURUIUU UUU.UUUUUU•UU..U.UUIUUpgUUiUUI.I.UU•UUUUUUUUUUUU•URUu.$•U UUUUUUUU UIUIUUUUURU•UUUU UUIUUI...0 uu•uum .. R.U.U.... UUUIUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUU••UUU UU•UUtUIUU IUU•UUUUUU UU.UUNUUi U••UUUUUUUUUURPfUUIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUU.
UIUUUUUUIUUUUPIUIUUUIUUUUUUUU•UUUUUIUUUUIIUIIUUUUnUU
UUUUUUUUUUU1UPSUUUUUUU•UUUUUIUU•IIUUURUUUUURUUUUURUUB*UU$U UIUUUUUUUUPIUUNUUU•UU•U•UUUU••UUUUUUUUUUUU•UU•UUUUUUUUU UUUUUIUAUPIUUUUUUUUUU•UIUUIUUUU•UIUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UIIIUIUUU•U UUUIUUUP& JUU•UUBIU IUUUUUUIUN UUUUUUUIUU I.UUUUUUUU UUU•UUUU IIUUUPIUUIUUUUUUUUIUIUIIUUUI.UUUUUU.aUUUU.UUUU.U.UmU I.P.UUU.UURUUMUUUIUIU.UUU.UUUUUIUUUUUUUU.Um...mRm NPUUUUUUUUUUUURUUUUUUUUUU••UUUUUIUUUURUUUUUUUUU5UU$UR$I UUUUUIIU UUIUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUU UUIUUIUUUU RIUUUUUIIMUUUURU UUUUUUUUUUUU•UUU•UR•UUUUUUUURUUUUUUUUVIUUU•UUUBfl
.......-...---....-...-....-.u-...u.-...-.....- -a..---.-...--..-...----.-..-.-..------.--.-..-.. _ _ - _ • _ _ _ _ ____ - __ - -- _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - -- - - - __ _ _ - -- __ _ _ _ - - - - - -- -- ---- - _•_ -- -- - - - -- - -- u -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- •____ ___ -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - --- -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --- - ___a_ -- -- - - - - - - -- - - --- -- - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - MM--MM --- __ - - a - a -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - - -
__ • • _ __ . _• . ___ _ _• • •. •_ _ __ •_ . _ _ _ _ • - _ • ._ __ .. • •• ___•• __________ _______•___________••___________________ - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- -- - ____ ___ -- - - - -- -- -- - ____ - - ___•
- - - - - -- - -- - - a_a - aaa - aaa -- - -- -- -- - • - - - - --
___--a__a
====•- =r=== ===== ========== ======== ===================
= == = =
---------------
• • - •_ •_ - •• _• •_• - - - ___
-- -- aa_ - - - -- --
===== === ==
u..•a•••.u••.•••••u.••••u•••••m••u••••uuu _. . . . . _... . . _....... . _ . . . . .... . _.. . ..... ._... . .... . _ • VA • ••• • • •• ••• •_ N - • • • • • N • • • •N• • - • U • • •• U• UU• - _ - _ a -- U N - - • - U -- U -- - U N - - UN - U - - - • - - -- - - - • - - - w_ - -- - -- - - - - - -- _____ - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -
-----------------
==== ===== ===== === == ===== ===== = === = === ==
:
•• • • • U• U U•U••NU• U • U - N•UN• U•• U • • • - - - _ _ - - U • - - - U U •U • U • - -. U - - U -. - - U - • Uaa - • a - - a • - a__U U a_a aaU a a - a U aUaUa aa Na__a--a- - - aaaaaa - a - - aaa a - a aa a_a a a a•a a a aa a a aa - aaa a_a a - afla - aaaa - aaafl aaaaaa - a a aaaaaa a a a a - - a aafl a a a aa - a a aaaaaa - aaaaaaaa a a - a - a_a aa aaaa a a - a_a aa - aa - a__a a a a
APPENDIX C
S 'S
n
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
These specifications present EarthTechnics Inc., standard
recommendations for grading and earthwork.
No deviation from these specifications should be permitted unless
specifically superseded in the geotechnical report of the project
or by written communication signed by the Geotechnical
Consultant. Evaluations performed by the Geotechnical Consultant
during the course of grading may result in subsequent
recommendations which could supersede these specifications or the
recommendations of the geotechnical report.
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 The Geotechnical Consultant is the Owner's or
Developer's representative .on the project. For the
purpose of these specifications, observations by the
Geotechnical Consultant include observations by the
Soils Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Engineering
Geologist, and those performed by persons employed by
and responsible to the Geotechnica]. Consultant.
1.2 All clearing, site preparation, or earthwork performed
on the project shall be conducted and directed by the
Contractor under the supervision of the Geotechnical
Consultant.
1.3 The Contractor should be responsible for the safety of
the project and satisfactory completion of all grading.
During grading, the Contractor shall remain accessible.
1.4 Prior to the commencement of grading, the Geotechnical
Consultant shall be employed for the purpose of
providing field, laboratory, and office services for
conformance with the recommendations of the
geotechnical report and these specifications. It will
be necessary that the Geotechnical Consultant provide
adequate testing and observations so that he may
determine that the work was accomplished as specified.
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to
assist the Geotechnical Consultant and keep him
apprised of work schedules and changes so that he may
schedule his personnel accordingly.
1.5 It shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor
to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish
the work in accordance with applicable grading codes,
agency ordinances, these specifications, and the
approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the
Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions,
such as questionable soil, poor moisture condition,
inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are
Standard Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Page Two
resulting in a quality of work less than required in
these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant will
be empowered to reject the work and recommend that
construction be stopped until the conditions are
rectified.
1.6 It is the Contractor's responsibility to provide access
to the Geotechnical Consultant for testing and/or
grading observation purposes. This may require the
excavation of test pits and/or the relocation of
grading equipment.
1.7 A final report shall be issued by the Geotechnical
Consultant attesting to the Contractor's conformance
with these specifications.
2.0 SITE PREPARATION
2.1 All vegetation and deleterious material shall be
disposed of off-site. This removal shall be observed
by the Geotechnical Consultant and concluded prior to
fill placement.
2.2 Soil, alluvium, or bedrock materials determined by the
-Geotechnical Consultant as being unsuitable for
placement in compacted fil is shall be removed from the
site or used in open areas as determined by the
Geotechnical Consultant. Any material incorporated as
a part of a compacted fill must be approved by the
Geotechnical Consultant prior to .f ill placement.
2.3 After the ground surface to receive fill has been
cleared, it shall be scarified, disced, or bladed by
the Contractor until it is uniform and free from ruts,
hollows, hummocks, or other uneven features which may
prevent uniform compaction.
The scarified ground surface shall then be brought to
optimum moisture, mixed as required, and compacted as
specified. If the scarified zone is greater than
twelve inches in depth, the excess shall be removed and
placed in lifts not to exceed six inchesor less.
Prior to placing fill, the ground surface to receive
fill shall be observed, tested, and approved by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
Standard Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Page Three
2.4 Any underground structures or cavities such as
cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic
tanks, wells, pipe lines, or others are to be removed
or treated in a manner prescribed by the Geotechnical
Consultant.
2.5 In cut-fill transition lots and where cut lots are
partially in soil, colluvium or unweathered bedrock
materials, in order to provide uniform bearing
conditions, the bedrock portion of the lot extending a
minimum of 5 feet outside of building lines shall be
overexcaváted a minimum of 3 feet and replaced with
compacted fill. Greater overexcavation couldbe
required as determined by Geotechnical Consultant where
deep fill of 20+ feet transitions to bedrock over a
short distance. Typical details are given on Figure D-
3.0 COMPACTED FILLS
3.1 Material to be placed as fill shall be free of organic
matter and other deleterious substanäes, and shall be
approved by the GeotechniCa]. Consultant. Soils of poor
gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics shall
be placed in areas designated by Geotechnical
Consultant or shall be mixed with other soils to serve
as satisfactory fill material, as directed by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
3.2 Rock fragments less than twelve inches in diameter may
be utilized in the fill, provided:
They are not, placed in• concentrated pockets.
There is a minimum of 75% overall of fine grained
material to surround the rocks.
The distribution of rocks is supervised by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
3.3 Rocks greater' than twelve inches in diameter shall be
taken off-site, or placed in accordance with the
recommendations of the Geotechnical Consultant in areas
designated as suitable for rock disposal. (A typical
detail for Rock Disposal is given in Figure D-2.
Standard Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Page Four
3.4 Material that is spongy, subject to decay, or otherwise
considered unsuitable shall not be used in the
compacted fill.
3.5 Representative samples of materials to be utilized as
compacted fill shall be analyzed by the laboratory of
the Geotechnical Consultant to determine their physical
properties. If any material other than that previously
tested is encountered during grading, the appropriate
analysis of this material shall be conducted by the
Geotechnical Consultant as soon as possible.
3.6 Material used in the compacting process shall be evenly
spread, watered, processed, and compacted in thin lifts
not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a
uniformly dense layer. The fill shall be placed and
compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise
approved by the Geotechnical Consultant.
3.7 If the moisture content or relative compaction varies
from that required by the Geotechnical- Consultant, the
Contractor shall rework .the fill until it is approved
by the Geotechnical Consultant.
3.8 Each layer shall be compacted to 90 percent of the
maximum density in compliance with the testing method
specified by the controlling governmental agency or
ASTh 1557-70, whichever applies.
If compaction to a lesser percentage is authorized by
the controlling governmental agency because of a
specific land use or expansive soil condition, the area
to receive fill compacted to less than 90 percent shall
either be delineated on the grading plan or appropriate
reference made to the area in the geotechnical report.
3.9 All fills shall be keyed and benched through all
topsoil, colluvium alluvium, or creep material, into.
sound bedrock or firm material where the slope
receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five horizontal to
one vertical, in accordance with the recommendations of
the Geotechnical Consultant.
3.10 The key for side hill fills shall be a minimum width of
15 feet within bedrock or firm materials, unless
otherwise specified in the geotechnical report. (See
detail on Figure D-3.)
Standard Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Page Five
3.11 Subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance
with the ordinances of the controlling governmental
agency, or with the recommendations of the Geotechnical
Consultant. (Typical Canyon Subdrain details are given
in Figure D-4.)
3.12 The contractor will be required to obtain a minimum
relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finish
slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and
stabilization fills. This may be achieved by either
over building the slope and cutting back to the
compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope
face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure
which produces the required compaction approved by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
3.13 All fill slopes should be planted or protected from
erosion by other methods specified in the Geotechnical
report.
3.14 Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly, keyed through
topsoil, colluviuin or creep material into rock or firm
materials, and the transition shall be.stripped of all
soil prior to placing fill. (See detail on Figure D-
3.)
4.0 CUT SLOPES
4.1 The Geotechnical Consultant shall inspect all cut
slopes at vertical intervals not exceeding ten feet.
4.2 If any conditions not anticipated in the geotechnical
' report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or
confined strata of a potentially adverse' nature,
unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes
encountered during grading, these conditions shall be
analyzed by the Geotechnical Consultant, and
recommendations shall be made to mitigate these
problems. (Typical details for stabilization of a
portion of a cut slope are given in Figures D-3a and D-
5.)
4.3 Cut slopes that face in the same direction as the
prevailing drainage shall be protected from slope wash
by a non-erodible interceptor swale placed at the tope
of the slope.
Standard Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Page Six
4.4 Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report,
no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than
thatallowed by the ordinances of controlling
governmental agencies.
4.5 Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance
with the ordinances of controlling governmental
agencies, or with the recommendations of the
Geotechnical Consultant.
5.0 TRENCH BACKFILLS
5.1 Trench excavations for utility pipes shall be
backfilled under the supervision of the Geotechnical
Consultant.
5.2 After the utility pipe has been laid, the space under
and around the pipe shall be backfilled -with clean sand
-or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one
foot over the top of the pipe. The sand backfill shall
be uniformly jetted into place before the controlled
backfill is.placed over the sand.
5.3 The on-site materials, or other soils approved by the
.Geotechnical Consultant shall be watered and mixed as
necessary prior to placement in lifts over the sand
backfill.
5.4 The controlled backfill shall be compacted to at least
90 percent of the maximum laboratory density as
determined by the ASTI D1557-70 or the controlling
governmental agency.
5.5 Field density tests and inspection of thebackfill
procedures shall be made by the Geotechnical Consultant
during backfilling to see that proper moisture content
and uniform compaction is being maintained. The
contractor shall provide test holes and exploratory
pits as required by the Geotechnical Consultant to
enable sampling and testing.
6.0 GRADING CONTROL
6.1 Inspection of the fill placement shall be provided by
the Geotechnical Consultant during the progress of
grading.
Standard Grading and' Earthwork Specifications
Page Seven
6.2 In general, density tests should be made at intervals
not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 500
cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary
depending on soil conditions and the size of the-job.
In any event, an adequate number of field density tests
shall be made to verify that the required compaction is
being achieved.
6.3 Density tests should also be made on the surface
material to receive fill as required by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
6.4 All cleanout, processed ground to receive fill, key
excavations, subdrains, and rock disposals should be
inspected and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant
prior to placing any fill. It shall be the
Contractor's responsibility to notify the Geotechnical
Consultant when such areas are ready for inspection.
7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
7.1 Erosion control measures, when necessary, shall .be
provided by the Contractor during grading and prior to
the completion and construction of permanent drainage
controls.
7.2 Upon completion of grading and termination of
inspections by the Geotechnica]. Consultant, no further
filling or excavating, including that necessary for
footings foundations, large tree wells, retaining
walls, or other features shall be performed without the
approval of the Geotechnical Consultant.
•• 7.3 • Care shall be taken by the Contractor during final
grading to preserve any berms, drainage terraces,
interceptor swales, or other devices of permanent
nature on or adjacent to the property.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS
(ONE AND TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS)
EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX
0 - 20 21 - 50 51 -90 91 - ISO
VERY LOW EXPANSION LOW EXPANSION MEDIUM EXPANSION HIGH EXPANSION
I-STORY FOOTINGS ALL FOOTINGS 12 INCHES ALL FOOTINGS 12 INCHES EXTERIOR FOOTINGS IS EXTERIOR FOOTINGS 24 INCHES
DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS INCHES DEEP. INTERIOR DEEP. INTERIOR FOOTINGS 12
CONTINUOUS. NO STEEL CONTINUOUS. I-NO. 4 BAR FOOTINGS 12 INCHES DEEP. INCHES DEEP. I-NO. S BAR TOP
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION TOP AND BOTTOM. 1-NO. 4 BAR TOP AND AND BOTTOM.
FORCES. BOTTOM.
I-STORY FOOTiNGS. ALL FOOTINGS 13 INCHES ALL FOOTINGS II INCHES ALL FOOTINGS 15 INCHES EXTERIOR FOOTINGS 24 INCHES
DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. INTERIOR FOOTINGS 15
CONTINUOUS. NO STEEL CONTINUOUS. 1-NO. 4 BAR CONTINUOUS. 1-NO. 4 BAR INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. S BAR TOP
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP AND BOTTOM. AND BOTTOM.
FORCES.
GARAGE DOOR GRADE NOT REQUIRED. 12 INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. 4 BAR IS INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. 4 BAR 24 INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. S BAR
BEAM TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP AND BOTTOM.
LIVING AREA FLOOR SLABS S 112 INCHES THICK. NO MESH 3112 INCHES THICK. 3 112 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHES THICK. B X I-IFS
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION I N 1-10110 WIRE MESH AT S N 0-10110 WIRE MESH AT WIRE MESH AT MID-HEIGHT.
FORCES. NO BASE REQUIRED. MID-HEIGHT. 2 INCHES MID-HEIGHT. 4 INCHES NO. $ DOWELLS FROM FOOTING
S MIL VISOMEEN MOISTURE GRAVEL OR SAND BASE. S GRAVEL OR BAND BASE. S TO BLAB AT $1 INCHES ON
BARRIER PLUS 1 INCH BAND. MIL VISQUEEN MOISTURE NIL VISQUEEN MOISTURE CENTER. 4 INCHES GRAVEL OR
GARRIER IPLUS 1 INCH BAND. BARRIER PLUS 1 INCH BAND. SAND BASE. S MIL VISOUEEN
MOISTURE BARRIER PLUS I
INCH BAND.
GARAGE FLOOR SLABS 3112 INCHES THICK. NO MESH S 112 INCHES THICK. 3 112 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHES THICK. I X S-Ill
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION S N 3-10110 WIRE MESH OR S N 1-10110 WIRE MESH OR WIRE MESH OR QUARTER
FORCES. NO BASE REQUIRED. QUARTER BLABS. ISOLATE QUARTER BLABS. ISOLATE BLABS. ISOLATE FROM STEM
NO MOISTURE BARRIER FROM STEM WALL FOOTINGS. FROM STEM WALL FOOTINGS. WALL FOOTINGS. 4 INCHES
REQUIRED. 2 INCHES ROCK. GRAVEL OR 4 INCHES ROCK. GRAVEL OR ROCK. GRAVEL OR SAND BABE.
SAND BASE. NO MOISTURE BAND BASE. NO MOISTURE NO MOISTURE BARRIER
BARRIER REQUIRED. BARRIER REQUIRED. REQUIRED.
PRE-BOAKING OF LIVING NOT REQUIRED. MOISTEN SOAK TO 12 INCHES DEPTH SOAK TO IS INCHES DEPTH SOAK TO 24 INCHES DEPTH TO
AREA AND GARAGE SLAB PRIOR TO POURING TO 4% ABOVE OPTIMUM TO S% ABOVE OPTIMUM BS ABOVE OPTIMUM MOISTURE
SOILS CONCRETE. MOISTURE CONTENT. MOISTURE CONTENT. CONTENT.
NOTES: I) ALL DEPTHS ARE RELATIVETO SLAB SUSGRADE.
2) SPECIAL DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR VERY HIGHLY EXPANSIVE SOILS.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
SLAB BUBGRADE- WIRE MESH---'t ,-SAND LAYER
DOWEL (WHEN OR SAND BABE (WHEN REQUIRED)
DEPTH OF DEPTH OF
EXTERIOR ..: PRE-SOAKED
DEPTH OF
INTERIOR
REINFORCING BAR
(WHEN REQUIRED)
INTERIOR FOOTING
FOOTING
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
JOB NO..! IDATE: IFIGUNE NO.:
EARTH TECHNUL
ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL
(Boulders greater than two feet
in diameter)
BUILDING
Finish arade
Clear area for foundations,
utilities, and OlS 10'SIope face
4 o
Windrow
10' or below depth of
deepest utility trench,
which ever is deeper
Clean (S.E.>30)
TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (edge view) • Granular soil flooded
to fill voids
PROFILE VIEW
TRANSITION LOT DETAILS
CUT-FILL LOT
NATURAL GROUND
I
COMPACTED FILL 30" MI N
-------------- ------------ I +
___________ OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT
'
UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR
MATERIAL APPROVED BY / THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
CUT LOT
NATURAL GROUND
I
UNSUITABLE '
- MATERIAL -
MIN.
------------------- ------------------ 30" MIN
OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT
1-
UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR
MATERIAL APPROVED BY.
I THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
NOTE:
Deeper overexcovotion and recomooction shalt be performed
if determined 0 be necesscry by the geotech-nical consultant.
BENCHING DETAILS
------------
FILL SLOPE COMPACTED
- FILL
---------------
----------------
-
-
PROJECTED PLANE
I to I maximum from toe ------
of slope to approved ground REMOVE
- - - -. UNSUITABLE
NATURAL
MATERIAL
GROUNDS BENCH BENCH
(typical) VARIES
I k
OWEST 2' MIN. IS' MIN.
KEY BENCH -
DEPTH (KEY)
FILL OVER MT SLOPE
-
---- FILL
---4 I
\.. 4' MI N. BENCH
BENC HEIGHT
IThyPica& VARIES
REMOVE.
UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL
NATURAl
GROUND
I.' 15, MIN.
LOWEST BENCH
CUT
FACE
To be constructed prior
to fill placement
NOTES:
LOWEST BENCH:
SJBDRAIJAG E:.
Depth and width subject to field change
based an consultant's inspection.
Ek may be required at the
discretion of the geotechnical consultant.
APPENDIX D
Blake, T.F., 1995, Computer Services Software, A Computer Program
fo the Deterministic Prediction of Peak Horizontal Acceleration
from Digitized California Faults, EQFAULT, July 1995
Blake, T.F., 1995, Computer Services Software, A Computer Program
to Determine Historical Seismicity from Digitized California
Faults, EQSEARCH, July 1995
Hart, E.W., 1994, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California,
Calif. Div. Mines & Geology, Special Pub. 42, 35 pages
Ploessel, M.R., Slosson, J.E., 1974, Repeatable High Ground
Accelerations from Earthquakes, California Geology, September
1974
Weber, F. H., 1977, Seismic Hazards Related to Geologic Factors,
Elsinore and Chino Fault Zones, Northwestern Riverside Countym
California, C.D.M.G. Open-File Report 77-4 LA
Weber, F. H., 1963, Mines and Mineral Resources San Diego County,
County Report 3, C.D.M.G. 309 pages
RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Residential Land Owner, please read this
agreement carefully and be sure you thoroughly understand before signing. Property
owner signature is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is
confirming the accuraciif ill information shown.
WILLIAM & D2LANE LANTZ
Name of Owner
144 REDWOOD AVENUE
Address
CARLSBAD CA
City, State Zip Code
-la,
760 2.95-5849
Telephone Number
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Name of Project
Carlsbad Tract Number
Carlsbad. California -9200
City, State State Zip Code
ONE
Total Number of Units
204-252-1000
Assessor's Parcel Number(s) or APN(s) and Lot Number(s) if not yet subdivided by County Assessor.
As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City of Carlsbad, California, the City is authorized to levy a Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 1. As cited in Policy 33 and adopted by the City Council. this Special Tax will not be allowed to pass through to the homeowner. At the time a
building permit is issued the Special Development Tax - One-Time is due per dwelling unit. In addition. there may be Special Taxes outstanding on the current tax roll or if a permit is issued after March 1, taxes will be levied in the coming fiscal year. All of these special taxes are the responsibility of the developer.
Accordingly, I agree to pay all of these current, outstanding and future Special Taxes. These taxes may not be apportioned to the homeowner as part of escrow closing.. (Note: Regular county taxes may be prorated.) I understand that by signing this I am agreeing to this provision.
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WILL
COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED ABOVE.
áZ ( 4&iI2 Signature of Property Owner Title
(911/,AM /,Avtfz,
Print Name Date
The City of Carlsbad has not independently verified the information shown above. Therefore, we accept no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of this information.
RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE CONTINUED:
The reverse side of this form explains the obligation of the residential developer to take
responsibility for the päinënt of all special taxes - the "One-Time Special Tax" collected
at building permit per dwelling unit and the "Annual Special Tax - Undeveloped Property"
levied annually against undeveloped parcels per net developable acre. (A parcel is
classified as undeveloped if as of March 1 of the previous fiscal year a building permit has
not been issued.) Further clarification of the two types of special tax can be found in the
information packet. By signing this certificate the developer is attesting to the fact that
they have been made aware and fully understand this responsibility.
To carry out this responsibility the developer must perform three steps:
Inform the escrow company of the obligation of the developer to be certain
that the Annual Special Tax - Undeveloped Property levied annually on the tax
roll and shown on the property tax bill is not prorated to the homebuyer.
Obtain the Annual Special Tax - Undeveloped Property amount levied on the
parcel. For escrows that close after approximately October 15th, the escrow
company can obtain this amount from the current tax bill. For escrows that
close between July 1 and approximately October 10th, the information is
available each July 1 by contacting the Community Facilities District
Administrator, Barbara Hale-Carter of Special District Financing &
Administration at (619)676-3686. (Please provide the parcel number(s) and
fax number.)
Inform the homebuyer that the developer has fulfilled the obligation and that
the special tax lien currently recorded against the property will be released
once the outstanding special tax is paid. The item will still appear on the
property tax bill for the current tax roll year only. Ultimately it is the
homeowners responsibility to make the property tax bill installments. Interest
and penalty will accrue on the special tax in the same amount and manner as
regular county property taxes. A lien release will be processed in
approximately July and the recorded document will be sent to the attention of
the owner of record as shown at the close of the secured roll of the County of
San Diego.
Please note, there can be several community facilities districts titled, Community Facilities
District No. 1. An example is the Carlsbad Unified School District, Community Facilities
District No. 1. Please read the property tax bill carefully to avoid any confusion. For
fiscal year 1997-98 the County has determined that the City of Carlsbad, Community
Facilities District No. I line item will read, "CARLSBAD COMM FAC DIST NO 1."
Please refer to the information packet or call the District Administrator (Barbara Hale-
Carter at 619-676-3686) with any questions.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CITY OF OF CARLSBAD• Plan Check No. iZX)f'ÔTI/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verity that the project
applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be
issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
Carlsbad Unified
801 Pine Avenue
Carlsbad CA 92008 (434-0661)
Encinitas Union
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd.
Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300)
Project Applicant:
Project Address:
San Marcos Unified
215 Mata Way
San.-Marcos CA 92069
736-2236
San Dieguito Union High School
710 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491)
APN:ZO'('-/? f1
RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area number of dwelling units
SQ. FT. of covered area• SQ. FT. of garage area
COMMERCIAL/lNDUS3JAt: SQ. FT. AREA
7/ Prepared by J')hlAa,14144 Date q
FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the School District)
Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080
Project is subject to an existing fee agreement
Project is exempt from Government Code 53080
Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986.
(other school fees paid)
Other .
Residential Fee Levied: $4,813.44 based on 2616 sq.ft.@ 1.84
Comm/Indust Fee Levied: $ based on sq.ft. @
L /\ Assistant Superintendent/BUS. Ser. 4/13/98
Schoo'NB1'strict Offic. Iial
A ') Title Date