The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1502 LAS FLORES DR; ; CB920300; Permit.ue: 2'--- 2.50 6.516 4.50 6.50 B U I L D I N G' P E B M I T Permit No: CB920300 04/23/92 16:52 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1502 LAS FLORES DR Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 156-110--59--00 Valuation: 53;660 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: R3/111 Class Code: Description: 728 SF 2S ADD + 48 SF DECK Appl/Ownr : SCHMUKLE, BRUCE 1502 LAS FLORES DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 9200fi- Project No: A9200761 Development No: Str: Fl: Ste: 7371 04/23/92 0001 01 02 C-PRHT 355-00 Status: ISSUED Applied: 03/23/92 Apr/Issue: 04/23/92 Validated By: DC 619 434-3292 Fees Required Fe ~s C Fees: 74.o&Qi Adjustments: / .00 Total Fees: I 783,...00 Toal Pa / Balan --- --escriPtion/ Zx Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y' for Plum Ang Issue ee Each Plumbing Fixtuie or Trap 6 Each Building Sewer ICORPORATED / * PLUMBING TOTAL \ (J 1952 Enter '1" for Electric \s Q'.ç Enter 'Y' for Remodel N f)P;:1..-c;") * ELECTRICAL TOTAL 0 Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Is Fed$ Each Install/Reloc Appliance Ven 1. Each Hood/Fireplace > 1 * MECHANICAL TOTAL ll cted & Credits .00 439.00 355. 00 Extfee Data ---------------- 433.00 281.00 5.00 719.00 7.50 Y 15.00 6.50 29.00 10.00 10.00 Y 20.00 15.00 1 4.50 6.50 26.00 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PLAN CHECK NO. ESF.VAL /0 PLAN CK DEPOSIT VALID. BY C-PRMT 439.00 PERMIT APPLICATION • City of CarLsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., CarLsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT 1YPE A - El Commercial I] New Building U Tenant Improvement B - 0 Industrial 0 New Building 0 Tenant Improvement C - 09 Residential 0 Apartment 0 Condo 12 Single Family Dwelling 'Addition/AIteration 0 Duplex 0 Demolition 0 Relocation 0 Mobile Home 0 Electrical 0 Plumbing 0 Mechanical 0 Pool 0 Spa 0 Retaining Wall 0 Solar 0 Other__________ 2. PRQJEC INFORMAllON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY or Nearest Cross Street f 52)2- (z, LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMIITED: 02 Energy Calcs 02 Structural Calcs 02 Soils Report Dl Addressed Envelope --5 DE5R1VflON OF WORK I r. 72 r #OF STORIES .). .J.141 IflS..I rr.np.JJ. 1.11 UISICICIIL I Ulli dpIILdIItJ NAME 14/10WRLEW !OI) i9,te. ADDRESS 31 Jaiz.ME (A1+ 100 CITY STATE (ft. ZIP CODE 9)-6 5 6 DAY TELEPHONE /7/1/)2O9/ 4. APPLICANT U COklHA1UR U ACENI' FOR WNTHA(JIUR U OWNER Li AGENI F'OkO*FDf NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE S. PRUPEY7R e4nie)r/F ADDRESS /5? V C7TY Cfrs/51c/ STATE e& ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE 6. CON CDNTRACTOR NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE UC. # LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS UC. # DESIGNER NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE UC. # 7. WORKERS' WMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to sell-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate 01 Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE S. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARA11ON Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: o I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 0 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES ONO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES 0 N Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES 0 N IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFItR JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIS11UCT. ereby affirm that tflere is a construction lending agency [or the performance of the work For Which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(1) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT CERTIFICA11ON - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL L1ABIIJTIES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF ThIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). DATE: • • JO ADOSS /co • TIME A.RrtlVE: __________TItE LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COIIIIENTS AOL _________ PEiUIT G/1!3/3 INSPECTOR AREA MP PLANCK# CB920300 0CC GRP R3/Ml CONSTR. TYPE VN STR: FL: STE: 619 434-3292 TYPE: RAD JOB ADDRESS: 1502 LAS FLORES DR APPLICANT: SCHMUKLE, BRUCE CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: MH/BRUCE/434-3292 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERNIT# CB920300 FOR 11/05/92 DESCRIPTION: 728 SF 2S ADD + 48 SF DECK PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 17 ST Interior Lath/Drywall INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 110292 Interior Lath/Drywall CA NP 101692 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP MP 101692 Rough/Topout AP MP 101692 Rough Electric AP MP 100692 Roof/Reroof AP NP 091692 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP NP 080692 Shear Panels/HD's PA NP 062692 Roof/Reroof AP NP 060892 Complaints Investigation AP NP 052092> Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA MP 052092 Rough/Topout PA MP 052092 Rough/Ducts/Dampers PA MP 052092 Gas/Test/Repairs AP MP 051892 Shear Panels/HD's CA NP 051592 Shear Panels/HD's CA NP 051592 Underground/Under Floor CA MP 050192 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA MP COMMENTS BRUCE NEW SECTION iDAD FOOTING FOR PORCH OK TO WRAP MEETS APP PLANS OK TO SHEAR EXT 1ST FLR 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR MARKED ON CARD 0 10/21/93 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING - FOR PERMIT# CB920300 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS 11/05/92 Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI . MH/BRUCE/434-3292 11/05/92 Interior Lath/Drywall NP AP 11/05/92 Exterior Lath/Drywall, MP AP 11/02/92° Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI MH/BRUCE/434-3292 11/02/92 Interior Lath/Drywall NP CA BRUCE 10/16/92 Fraine/Steel/Bolting/Wel RI RI NH/DAVE/434-3292 10/16/92 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel NP AP 10/16/92 Rough/Topout RI RI NH/DAVE/434-3292 10/16/92, Rough/Topout NP AP 10/16/92 Rough Electric . RI RI MH/DAVE/434-3292 10/16/92 Rough Electric . NP AP 10/06/92 Roof/Reroof RI RI MHDAVE/434-3292 10/06/92 Roof/Reroof NP AP NEW SECTION 09/16/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NP AP PAD FOOTING FOR PORCH. 08/06/92 Shear Panels/HD's NP PA. OK TO.WRAP 08/06/92 Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI NH/DAVID 08/06/92 Interior Lath/Drywall NP WC 06/26/92 Roof/Reroof RI RI MH/DAVID/434-3292 06/26/92 Roof/Reroof , MP . AP 06/08792 Complaints Investigatio NP AP MEETS APP PLANS 05/20/92 Fraiue/Steel/Bolting/Wel RI RI MH/BRUCE/434-3292 05/20/92 Fraine/Steel/Bolting/Wel MP PA' OK TO SHEAR EXT 1ST FLR 05/20/92 Gas/Test/Repairs MP AP . 05/20/92 Rough/Topout RI RI MH/BRUCE/434-3292 05/20/92 Rough/Topout MP PA. 1ST FLOOR 05/20/92 ' Rough/Ducts/Dampers RI RI . NH/BRUCE/434-'3292 05/20/92 Rough/Ducts/Dampers NP PA 1ST FLOOR .05/18/92 Shear Panels/HD's RI RI RS/DAVID/434-3292 05/18/92 Shear Pánels/HD's NP' CA 05/15/92 Shear Panels/HD's ' RI RI NH/BRUCE 05/15/92 Shear Panels/HD's ' NP CA - 05/15/92 Underground/Under Floor RI RI NH/BRUCE 05/15/92 Underground/Under Floor NP CA 05/01/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI MH/DAVID/434-3292 05/01/92 Ftg/Foundat.ion/Piers NP PA MARKED ON CARD HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE... PROFESSIONAL REGISTERED INSPECTIONS, INC 7895 Convoy Court *15 San Diego, Ca. 92111 1. JOB NO.: 1:889 JOB ADDRESS: 1502 LAS FLORES DRIVE ARCHITECT: WARREN W SCOTT JOB NAME: SCHMUCKLE RESIDENCE ENGINEER: ANDERSON ENGINEERING BLDG ALITH: CITY OF CARLSBAD GEN CONTRACTOR: YACKLEY DESIGN CONSTR. MAT'L: BOLTS CONTRACTOR: YACKLEY DESIGN PLAN FILE: DESCRIBE MAT'L: 7/9 DIA., ALL THREAD BOLTS, LIQUID ROCK 300 1 INSPECTION REPORT 5/1 1.. Inspected the install ration of epoxy resin and S holddown bolt.s . LÀ quid rock 300 replaced hilti HBP resin I---B,2- 1+0 16, Work was in accordance with plans and manufactur'er 's i nstr'uct ions, Engineer to approve sustit'jtion for epoxy, Permit #92-300 ( DALE REGLI SUPERVISOR INSPECTOR 5/19/92 280 DATE REGISTER * PROFESSIONAL REGISTERED INSPECTIONS, INC. 7895 Convoy Court #15 S San Diego, Ca. 92111 1 JOB NO..: 4889 JOBADDRESS 502L :FLogEE DFIVE ARCHITECT WARREN W. SCOTT JOB NAME: SCHM'JCKLE RESIDENCE ENGINEER: ANDERSON ENGINEERING BLDG AUTH: CITY OF CARLSBAD GEN CONTRACTOR: YACKLEY DESIGN CONSTR. MAIL: BOLTS CONTRACTOR: YACKLEY DESIGN PLAN FILE: DESCRIBE MAT'L: 7/8" DIA, ALL THREAD BOLTS, LIQUID ROCK 300 INSPECTION REPORT 5/'i. Inspected the installation of epoxy resin and 5 hoiddown bolts. Liquid rock 300 replaced hilti HBP resin ICBO 4016. Work wa performed in accordance with plans and manufacturer 's instructions.. Engineer to approve sustitution for epoxy. Permit #92-300 DALE REGLI SUPERVISOR INSPECTOR 5/19/92 : 280 DATE REGISTER * - —s - - - - - ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560.1468 DATE: el Pr - 1/; -AP J1RISDICTI JURISDICTION: C1L ó JP CKER II OFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: C - ..3c SET: CUPS TDESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: 25 _L05FIorc r. PROJECT NAME: 39iz 4d Ej .) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for .a complete recheck. fl The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicantcontact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Li Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # REMARKS: By: J1 ',--_)aArL Enclosures:I.Orz ESGIL CORPORATION - 9 LGA L:CM V ESGIL CORPORATION 9320' CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619)560.1468 DATE: - JURISDICTION: 11.J A CA PLAN CHECK NO: &7 q -5i' SET: - PROJECT. ADDRESS: L, 'F/prcDr. PROJECT NAME: ( ) O APPLICANT ;,; UR DI TI NHcKER OFILE COPY DUPS F_-DESIGNER Lj The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. Li The plans transmitted -herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified ' are resolved and checked by building department staff. Li The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. fl The 'applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to -return to the applicant -contact person. .Theapp1icant's copy of the check list has been'-sent-to: in Esgil staff didnot advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed.. Li Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check' has been completed. Person contacted:________________________ Dateontacted: ' 'Telephonei______________ Li REMARKS: _ -- By: i,, _3aE,4 Enclosures: ,'-Jô ESGIL CORPORATION -, L.JGA 1-7-CM cr' €,rt,oks.. c7r1 ,,,c.T1 bcT1. k&kv'. ( 5\o eA -i c t it t.oC. 2_ al, eeCt ( ) 3/4k' CôerPlpt S T0 1. s / T- 24 \ tA(A eJ'ftC. &)'OO (p S LL ri- pveL)o TT ct, LAc. PL 4 ( c'c) fl () 1)) JJL 'osi 4. /'—' vs 6 (-bo * e. ut ' a \ 7K . • _______ 3 A r t L)e S L ( K) 5 L a ( Date: Jurisdiction - Prepared by: Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 'sgi1 PLAN CHECK NO. C6 ia-A: () BUILDING ADDRESS - '5O2_ br, APPLICANT/CONTACT v-e PHONE NO. - BUILDING OCCUPANCY T&i DESIGNER PHONE - TPE OF CONSTRUCTION -" CONTRACTOR PHONE_________ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE Air_ConditioninE Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers • .•:: _______________ ___________ ___________________ Total Value E3 40 Building Permit Fee $_ $ L5 Plan Check Fee $ $ 13 COMMENTS • • SHEET OF OF_____ 12/8-7 BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST DATE: ITEM COMPLETE U. PLANCHECK NO. (Yi2-OW ITEM INCOMPLETE NEEDS YOUR ACTION 1 2 3 L4; i. ___ ITEM SELECTED r729 rNP r Re 0 > fl1 A P tT C C C PROJECT ID: AN H H H TgF. VAt-tA-'. EE E C C C LEGAL REQUIREMENTS K/K K Site Plan 1.. Provide a fully - dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and / proposed structures,, streets, existing street improvements, / right-of-way width and dimension setbacks. I!J show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and / proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and / drainage patterns. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance No Discretionary approvals were required. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No.________________ 4. 6. Project does not comply with the-. following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project NO.__________________ Conditions complied with by: _Date:________ Field Review Field review completed. No issues raised. Field review completed. The following issues or , discrepancies with the site plan were found:. A. Site lacks adequate public improvements E 100-111 '-i B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines. P\D0cs\1OSF0RMS\PRM0010.DH . REV. 02127/91 I D. E. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate Street improvement. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. 4 Other: 'tkjLtK M\O( rY Dedication Reaiuirements 9. No dedication required. F7 F7 E 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8¼" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documentsmust be. approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The'description of the dedication is as follows:_______________________ Dedication completed, Date . By:_ Improvement P)t) ,14- .11. No public improvements required. 5PECIAL NOTE: Damao ed or JTJi! be reR ired to the satisfaction of the City ins2ector Rrior 12. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are:______ Improvement plans signed, Date: by: P : \DOCS\$1 SFORNS\FRNOOIO .DN • • REV. 02/27/91 I 13. ImprovementS are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By: E E 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). 14. No grading required as determined by. the information provided on the site plan. F7 F1 0 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Insector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: by: Miscellaneous Permits / 16., Right-of-Way Permit not required. E 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 18. Sewer, Permit is not required. Sewer Permit is required. A jever Permit is required / concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required / is noted below in the fees section. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. • P:\DOCS\$ISFORMS\FINOOIO.DN • REV. 02/27/91 21. 4) Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waster Permit accepted - Date: By: Fees Reaukred 0 . 27. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant: Fee per Unit: Total Fees: 23. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: S Total. Fee: - 0 24. Bridge and Thorough, fare Fee - • . -. - • Fee Per Unit: ' • Total Fee: C3 VA .25. Public Facilities Fee required. 0 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: Fee: 0 27. Sewer Fees Permit No. , EDU's_______ Benefit Area:_______________ Fee:_______________ 0 28. Sewer Lateral Required: Fee:____________ S S 0 29. .REMARKS: - ENGINEERING AUTBORIThTION TO' ISSUE PERMIT.. BY _ DATE:' P:\OOCS\MISFORMS\FRMOOIO.DH • S REV. 02/27/91 1j ' ) ) 4 I U U U C C C . 0. 0. PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. 70—Jc9D Address I S22- 4A5é2ah-r Planner I/' Phone 438-1161 ext. (Name) APN: S Type of Project and Use Zone - Facilities Management Zone I Legend / Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified ao C3 Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which re-quire-'action. Conditions of Approval S tionary Action Required: YES -. NO TYPE APPROVAL¼/RESO. NO. DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval - - California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES - NO 2~ DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District,'3 111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 S S Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval S S I 0 0 Landscape Plan Required: YES _ NO See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans . : Site Plan: .. : 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale.. Show: North , arrow, 'property dines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, 'existiig' street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. - 0 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. S 0 3. Provide legal description of property. 0 4. Provide assessor's parcel number. Zoning: • • • / 0 1., Setbacks: ' /IOP) to 510 Front: • Side: • Required Required 2(7' (0 Shown Shown Int. Street Side: . Shown '-6- Required v_- Rear: Required 00" / Shown 6 0 2. Lot coverage: Required Shown Z 2 1113 0 3. Height: Required / Shown Z- ' 0 4. Parking: Spaces Required ?--Shown 2- Guest Spaces Required Shown 0iEE 0 Additional Comments A.b I'i'P A ,, i, pv- 5 al/ ''- T G1 A WIbaO. OK TO fSSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER C' 4'4 DATE PLNCK.FRM LI PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Single Family Residence Second story addition Site: 1502 Las Flores Carlsbad, CA 21 February 1992 Owner Mr. Bruce Schmuck-le PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 S. Escondido Blvd. Escondido, CA 92025 -1-- INDEX General Information .3 of 5 NaturalTerrain............................................3 of 5 Seismic Activity ...........................................3 of 5 Field Investigation & Test Results .........................4 of 5 Recommendations............................................4 of 5 Conclusion.................................................5 of 5 APPENDIX Appendix "A" - Site Map Fault Location Map Unified Soil Classification Chart Appendix "B" - Standard Specifications for Compacted Filled Ground Homeowners Maintenance Guidelines - 2 - PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD., ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 JOHN E. VERNON, PRESIDENT, RCE 21121, GE 858 CHARLES W. DAVIS, VICE PRESIDENT, RCE 21719 BARRY L. MUNSON, PROJECT ENGINEER, RCE 40980 FREDERICK F. BRONSON, CHIEF OF SURVEYS, LS 5085 DELBERT C. DANIELS, CHIEF OF MAPPING, LS 3351 February 21, 1992 Mr. Bruce Schmuckle 1502 Las Flares Carlsbad, CA 92024 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Site: 1502 Las Flores Carlsbad, CA 92024 To whom it may concern: Our firm has completed a visual and limited underground survey of the native soils at the above referenced site. A second story addition is planned over the existing house. Existing footings are at locations shown on the attached plat map. These footings measured approximately 12" deep and 12" wide into cemented sand subsoil. No seepage was in evidence during the site inspection. There are no known faults located close to the site (Elsinore fault is approximately 27 miles NE). (Rose Canyon fault is 10 mi± SW). It is our opinion that the site could be subjected to moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake along either of these faults, however, the seismic risk at the site is not considered significantly greater than that of the surrounding area. Construction in accordance with the minimum standards of the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code should minimize potential damage as a result of seismic activity. The native soil is 'a brown silty sand (SM) and is not detrimentally expansive (Carlsbad Sand USDA). An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf may be used for design purposes. If the proposed design requirements exceed 1500 psf, additional footing work will be required. Active and passive fluid pressures of 40 (60 for restrained or sloping backfill) 300 pcf and a friction factor of .4 should be used for wall design. A PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING • SOILS TESTING • SURVEYING TEL. (619) 743-8808 FAX (619) 743-7466 lateral bearing of 300 psf/ft may be used for pole design using flagpole formula (UBC 2907g). All foundations should be founded in firm natural soil or properly compacted embankment. The soils engineer shall review any added footing excavations prior to concrete placement to ensure adequate foundation support. All slabs should be placed on a granular nonexpansive sub-basè at least 12" thick. Driveway subgrades should be certified before surface is placed If additional driveway work is accomplished. TEST AND ANALYSES of the prevailing subgrade soils indicated the following engineering properties: Unified Soil Classification SM Soil Type silty sand In-place Density 127 pcf Maximum Dry Density 131 pcf Optimum moisture content 9.4 % Active Soil Pressure 40 pcf (Restrained or sloping bkfill) 60 pcf Passive Soil Pressure 300 pcf Design Bearing Value 1500 psf Friction Factor .4 Any driveway grading should be done in accordance with the Grading Ordinance of the County of San Diego, City of Carlsbad, and the attached Standard Specifications for the Placement of Compacted Filled Ground. Special care should be taken to provide and maintain proper drainage away from all footings. - 4 - The conclusions and recommendations herein have been based on the observations and/or testing as noted as well as our experience. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Property Development Engineers, Inc. John E. Vernon RCE 21121, GE 858 Exp. 9/30/93 LJ No.858 \t\ ExP..3o.3J 02 No. C21T21 CI VIV - 5 - - APPENDIX tA" 1oo'.o fkNUCJLE 1ES V1DD/TIUN Lfl5 FLtE3 DR. f 194 RIVERSIDE LIT: ANGELES 1918 146 j S I9O A A 6çACI1 -. 0 R A H C E R I .. V •.. .R S \ ~ lNOREN \Q; SS\ lNOO to ci k I8IZ • 1937 1933 1910 e,j 1954 ROSE CAWOI'4-;~' 1966 FAULT ZONZE 6.5 4çyN) COOAOO6AUKS •. FAULT ZONE ¶ I G 0 I5SS I94 CPLQ I 4 — ---—------------- (I t.OU(T( It S . I . L1itCS . L 7 • . : -- ... ,• .•. - ',. - —' I \ '--- C / t_..-,.--c OC I.- •• I.lIII. rb.. C-.. ..4 . IQS2 M77 E-& .,.oc P13 pIood ...p.od I. I'I..CC C I Codc b7 i$c r' — I I a cr M • 73/ -. FAULT LOCATION MAP _____ PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 SOUTH ESCONDIDO BOULEVARD ESCONDIDO. CAIJFORNIA92025 . .... PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD., ESCONDI DO, CA 92025 JOHN E. VERNON, PRESIDENT, RICE 21121, GE 858 CHARLES W. DAVIS, VICE PRESIDENT, RICE 21719 BARRY L. MUNSON, PROJECT ENGINEER, RCE 40980 FREDERICK F. BRONSON, CHIEF OF SURVEYS, LS 5085 DELBERT C. DANIELS, CHIEF OF MAPPING, LS 3351 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMSOL TYPICAL NAMES CLEAN GW well glided gli.cI. gi CI-Litld tfl41t4Kc. kttic of - GRAVELS GRAVELS Iwe. U) cc o MORE THAN IrCALf cicss IKAN GP ?Oofly glided gravcls 01 gfavcl-sand imIu,c1. ttik Of —I UI o OF COARSE 5% FIN(S) - ,. GRAVEL GM Sit y g'ga and -till mi,tufc's. non-pl31tC hreg. U) a FRACTION IS C w a LARGER THAN WITH Z NO. 4 SIEVE FINES GC CI3rcy gticI. gca.cI-ird-cIay plall.0 lAef. < -JI <,. UI > SANDS CLEAN SW Well gidcd IJAd) Q1i1CIIy r4g• IItIc 01 no lines.o 1 c SANDS SF °°'1r glided ,.inds 01 g(ilcII. &ar,dg. I(IIe no ZUI U) U) MORE THAN HALF (LESS THAN OF COARSE 5% FIN(S) SANDS SM 5r ". nO(çJI1$IC fiews. FRACTION IS L) SMALLER THAN WITII SC CLiycy Landt. i.j4-cIa,' r&IIUICI pZilc fnc. NO. 4 SIEVE 111455 ML LA3I9aIUC 1II1 id c'y (e 1,rdg, rock iloul. IIy 01 c- (I. .agg o cia,'c'y LItS w,II il9hI pligl.CC,.. SILTS ND CLAYS CL ( I'-.n.0 cli,s o( Io.. I.) mcdk'n pIdlCIy, Qi'cI o U) u. < LI0JD 1I..;r IS C-.yg, ct.1 y. I;Iy CII ,. kin cli yc. OIL O'p' OIL ar tt' cLs ol Lw p!I:tCly. o LE.S THAN w (.1 0 = SILTS AD CJ..I'S t'I 11 m<ic d crJcc-3 (n i.iy c' . Ill,. 10.l dllglC 1Ig E° w . UGU3 LIMIT IS CH of h.h p tcly. 1,1 CLay1. OH O.a,s< CII( of m dki'n [a h½1 pIIcIy.o'QC 01g. — GREATER TIC1 SO.. 17 HIGHLY SOILS JN Pc.t arj 0Ir lgIIy OVgnC 1IL. GRAIN SIZE U.S. ST.NOARD SERIES SIEVE I- CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 200 40 10 4 3/.' 3" 12, SILTS AND CLAYS SAND . GRAVEL COBBLES BOULDERS FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE j , COARSE RELATIVE DENSITY SANDS.GRAVELS At( NON-PLASTIC SILTS BLOWS/FOOT VERY LOOSE 0 - 4 LOOSE 4 —to MEDIUM DENSE 10 -30 DENSE 33-SO VERY DENSE O'ER SO CONSISTENCY CLAYS AND PLASTIC SILTS STRENGTH BLOWS/FOOT VERY SOFT 0-114 -0-2 SOFT 1/4-1,2 2-4 FIRM V - I 4 -8 STIFF I -2 8 -16 VERY STIFF 2 — 4 16 732 HARD OVER 4 OVER 32 Water level at time of excavation or as indicated / Undisturbed driven ring or chunk sample El Disturbed bulk sample PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING • SOILS TESTING • SURVEYING TEL i'619 74.q-RRnA FAY 1Q\ 7d1.7dAR APPENDIX "B" PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD., ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 JOHN E. VERNON, PRESIDENT, RCE 21121, GE 858 CHARLES W. DAVIS, VICE PRESIDENT, RCE 21719 BARRY L. MUNSON, PROJECT ENGINEER, ACE 40980 FREDERICK F. BRONSON, CHIEF OF SURVEYS, LS 5085 DELBERT C. DANIELS, CHIEF OF MAPPING, LS 3351 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND Objective: Obtain filled ground which is uniform and has adequate internal strength to support any structures proposed. The method by which this is obtained is described herein. Preliminary Procedures: Permits - Owner shall ascertain the grading permit requirements of the agency whose jurisdiction covers the land on which the grading is to be performed and shall be responsible for complying with them. Water - An adequate water supply shall be provided so that compaction of filled ground will not be delayed. Soils Engineer - A soils engineer shall be retained to provide direction in grading, testing for compaction and certification that the grading complies with grading ordinances and with approved grading plans. Grading: Clearing-and Gub_ig - All natirai surfacewhich - is to be covered by filled ground, excavated or needed for brow ditches, swales or other grading appurtenances shall be cleared and grubbed. Trees, shrubs and grass, as well as organic overburden shall be removed from the area to be graded. Cleared material may be disposed of as approved by the local controlling agency. No embankment shall consist of trees, shrubs or other organic material. 2. Natural Ground Preparation - Natural ground shall be excavated from beneath embankment areas to solid material, the exact depth as determined by the' soils engineer. This material shall be brought to proper moisture content and _ recompacted to not less than 90% maximum density as - determined by A.S.T.M. D-1557-70. /r\ PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING • SOILS TESTING • SURVEYING TEL. (619) 743-8808 FAX (619) 743-7466 Any existing fill, which has not been certified must be removed and recompacted. If the slope of the existing ground exceeds 1' vertical in 6' horizontal, a bench cut level, 10' wide shall be excavated at the toe of the fill. This will allow the embankment to be placed on a horizontal base for more uniform compaction. Embankment Placement - Fill material should consist of native or imported material which has been brought to the optimum moisture content. Material to be used for embankments may have rocks with diameters greater than 12" providing they are evenly distributed in the soil mixture and are at least 3' below finish grade. Fill slopes shall not consist of, or be founded on, large rocks. Although rocks may be placed along the outside of the toe of the fill slopes. Rock placement in embankments shall be under direct supervision of the soils engineer. Embankment material shall be placed in layers varying from 6" to 12" deep depending on soil type, and compacted by suitable compactive effort to a density or not less than 90% of the maximum density as determined by A.S.T.M. D-157-70. Moisture content and depth of layers shall be determined by the soil engineer at the time of grading, and shall be updated whenever embankment soil types change. As the embankment increases in elevation, new benches shall be cut into original ground. Benches shall be at east 6' -horizontally into natural-ground, be level - and shall occur at intervals to be determined by the soils engineer at the time of grading. Compaction may be obtained by the use of any combination of equipment which will result in an embankment that is properly compacted, uniform in moisture and properly finished to the line and grades shown on the plans or to those set forth in the applicable grading ordinance. Additional Grading - Cut slopes shall be cut to the lines and grades as shown on the plans or set forth in the applicable grading ordinance. Cut slopes shall be protected from erosion by brow ditches. Brow ditches shall be either earthen or lined with erosion resistant material as shown on the plans or as recommended by the engineer. - 2 - Embankments shall be protected from erosion by placing an earthen. berm along the top of slope for the entire perimeter of the fill. Where drainage is brought down the slope, the drainage way shall be lined with erosion resistant material to prevent loss of embankment slopes. Where eaves are located, less than 5' horizontally from top of ill slopes, eaves troughs shall be provided to prevent weakening of slope due to water intrusion. All areas of the building pad must be well drained. Drainage swales shall have a minimum slope of 1' vertical in loot horizontal unpaved or 1' vertical in 200' horizontal paved with concrete. • Drainage shall be provided to ensure foundations will not be subjected to ponded water. -.3- PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD., ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 JOHN E. VERNON, PRESIDENT, RCE 21121, GE 858 CHARLES W. DAVIS, VICE PRESIDENT, RCE 21719 BARRY L. MUNSON, PROJECT ENGINEER, RCE 40980 FREDERICK F BRONSON, CHIEF OF SURVEYS, LS 5085 DELBERT C. DANIELS, CHIEF OF MAPPING, LS 3351 MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR HOME OWNERS Homesites, in general, and hillside lots, in particular, need maintenance to continue to function and retain their value. Many homeowners are unaware of this and allow deterioration of their property. It is important to familiarize homeowners with some guidelines for maintenance of their properties and make them aware of the importance of maintenance. Some governing agencies require hillside property developers to utilize specific methods of engineering and construction to protect those investing in improved lots or constructed homes. For example, the developer may be required to grade the property in such a manner that rainwater will be drained away from the lot and to plant slopes so that erosion will be minimized. He may also be required to install permanent drains. However, once the lot is purchased, it is the buyer's responsibility to maintain these safety features by observing a prudent program of lot care and maintenance. Failure to make regular inspection and maintenance of drainage devices and sloping areas may cause severe financial loss. In addition to his own property damage, he may be subject to civil liability for damage occuring to neighboring properties as a result of his negligence. The following maintenance guidelines are provided for the protection of the homeowner's investment. Surface drainage must be directed away from structural foundations to prevent ponding of storm waters or irrigation adjacent to footings. Care should be taken that slopes, terraces, berms (ridges at crown of slopes) and proper lot drainage are not disturbed. Surface drainage should be conducted from the rear yard to the street through the side yard, or to natural drainage ways within the property boundary. In general, roof and yard runoff should be conducted to either the street or storm drain by nonerosive devices such as sidewalks, drainage pipes, ground gutters and driveways. Drainage systems should not be altered without expert consultation. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING • SOILS TESTING • SURVEYING TEL. (619) 743-8808 FAX (619) 743-7466 4. All.drains should be kept cleaned and unclogged, including gutters and downspouts. Terrace drains or gunite ditches should be kept free of debris to allow proper drainage. During heavy rain periods, performance of the drainage system should be inspected. Problems, such as gullying and ponding, if observed, should be corrected as soon as possible. 5. Any leakage from pools, waterlines, etc. or bypassing of drains should be repaired as soon as practical. 6. Animal burrows should be eliminated since they may cause diversion of surface runoff, promote accelerated erosion and even trigger shallow soil flowage. 7. Slopes should not be altered without expert consultation. Whenever an owner plans a significant topographic modification of the lot or slope, a qualified soils engineering consultant should be contacted. 8. If the owner plans modification of cut or natural slopes within his property, a soil engineering consultant should be consulted. Any oversteeping may result in a need for expensive retaining devices. Undercutting of a toe-of-slope would reduce the safety factor of the slope and should not be undertaken without expert consultation. 9. If unusual cracking, settling or earth slippage occurs on the property, the owner should consult a qualified soils engineer or an engineering geologist immediately. 10. The most common causes of slope erosion and shallow slope failures are as follows: - Gross Neglect of the care and maintenance of the slopes and drainage devices. Inadequate and/or improper planting. (Barren areas should be replanted as soon as Possible.) Excessive or insufficient irrigation or diversion of runoff over the slope. 11. Owners should not let conditions on. their property create a problem for their neighbors. Cooperation with neighbors could prevent problems, promote slope stability, adequate drainage, proper maintenance, and also increase the aesthetic attractiveness of the community. - 2 - CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. 9'. 3d.p DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION - 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 1138-1161 ( This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: /' _____ Carlsbad Unified San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue 1290 West San Marci,s Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) San Marcos, CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, C& 92024 (619) 944-430U Encinitas, CA .92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant! cc44L.zoo 1!4AZ g, APN: Project Address': b RESIDENTIAL: 'SQ. FT. of living area number of dwelling units____________ '\ SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area_____________ COMMERCIAL/ IN STRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA Date Prepared by ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement sunder Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 _____Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $_J/SO./basd on 72 sq. ft. @ / S Cordm/In ust-Fp4p Levied:$__based-on sq. ft. @______________ 'Schol District Official Title Date '1 AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.58 per square foot for residential.. AB 2926 is capped at -.26C per square foot for commercial /industrial.,