Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1525 FARADAY AVE; ; CB010190; Permit
\I ' / :\ ":\_6 iv,: -'\ e:::i \"? 6~ c} '<.., City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 \J) ·0"" V (~- ·11-01-2001 l,Q Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 CB010190 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: 11/01/2001 Applicant: 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD COMMIND Sub Type: 2121302700 Lot#: $5,854,656.00 Construction Type: Reference #: COMM 0 NEW EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTER 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 01/16/2001 CB Plan Approved: 11/01/2001 RON GROSS SUITE 165 EMERALD LAKE CORP. CENTRE,LLC STEC 5465 MOREHOUSE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 ~58-552-8424 Total Fees: $244,249.86 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee -z 2 Inspector: ~...22,;. 2117 INDUSTRIAL CT VISTA CA 92083 AS.47 11 /M (Qi QM? Q1 A':> Total Payments To Date: $4,038.04 Balance Due: 24QiG~ 24021.1.-82 $12,843.36 $0.00 $8,348.18 $0.00 $0.00 $1,229.48 $33,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,200.00 D1.5 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size Add'I Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFO Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Redev Parking Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $280.00 $6,012.00 $0.00 $106,554.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,575.00 $0.00 $525.00 $410.00 $84.50 $0.00 $53,302.60 $0.00 $85.00 $244,249.86 FINAL APPROVAL Date: ;&~/'! Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 EST. VAL. --t;a"~"--"-'!;,""--:br:,::~s=,f-"--"'-- Plan Ck. Deposit -=:c,-~--=..L...£-;r'-r,-t<- Validated By_-"-{_·~'-=--------- Date I ,,.; I (p-{5 I Address (include Bldg/Suite #) (4,..) Business Name (at this address) lp::r_ /OZ., ~J..b/b1P ~ell' ~ Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name 'If;.· .. , P.B9P:~tni QWl\!!;.li N·6J . Name ($;. ,.-99f.!J8.A·cro1t.:¢0.~:PANY'"NAM.E-.. ,., (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Ke:;r.;;,z¼"'-,) C..f')L, -==ct-1t:-u:oixt2Yi. u) 4/d..35 Evter:p,:;se._ t:::..IY'd,e. /...JO·~ A-. --fe.Mec«Ltt.-~ Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# 9 ;;:,..-;s~ o State License # ;/-95:t./ z o-License Class E!::r I City Business License # / .:ltJ Z:S.3 o2_ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ :S; ... V)i~_KE.RS; COi\i!PE!'JSATlON . . .. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. D I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permi is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: 0 / /t!!:7/ ~oo::}__ Insurance Company .5fa-le. ~' I I..PSwrA ../4 &d Policy No./~ 5 CJ{) 0 (o Expiration Date~~~E~§~ l (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollar~($100,000I I additi to e cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Lab,r code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE'JV~::=:::~'/.!k~A~~Z:::::22'.~~~-------------DATE // ,///tt:J I 1,.. QVVNl:!.R~ijl,l_ii.Di( . l;C.LA~ATIOt-J .. . . . , .. . .. . I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason; 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _______________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ______________________ _ DATE -----------:cc;iMPli;:'r; TJ:11S SEQTIOf("FOR N,Q/V;;RESIOENT/AL_ j:IUILDING ·PERMiT~·:oNtY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. iK.:~~co~~TR).ic,;1,QN.t~J\lD!NCfAG~N~Y · __ .... --~-----:_. " .. _ .. .. . .. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ----------------LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ ! ~.; · J:\P.PtlPA:Nf-CEffFlf!CA'J19N , -n< ._,_,,.,,.,..,._, ,v:, V , ...... ,,, ',V''.~"', "":, .,.,, ,...,_,,V I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permitorlftlieb'ail ing or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is com111enc fQLll peciod-el 106 days-(Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building ode). · APPLICANT'S SIGNATURz::_:~~~~~~~A~'/LZ.'../L,'K.J,'CJ.'.:k~:::,,...-=-L----DATE {)j> (/61 • tJ I Citv of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite (Fir!) Plan Check#: Date: 12/11/2002 Permit#: CB010190 Permit Type: COMMIND Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTER Sub Type: COMM 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG Address: 1525 FARADAY AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: MARTIN Phone: 7608021049 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA ~;,pected .4-+ Date Ii) ts/a~ Approved: ~isapproved: __ Inspected: I Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: lnsp_ected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... Comments: _____________________________ _ Citv of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Eni_in~f1.f,i1ng Planning CMWD St Lite Fire ;,.,-..._ . ~ ti ---,, Plan Check#: Date: 1-2/11'/2002- Permit#: CB010190 Permit Type: COM MIND Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTER Sub Type: COMM 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG Address: 1525 FARADAY AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: MARTIN Phone: 7608021049 Sewer Dist: Water Dist: CA ....................................................................................................................... Date l -z./ (1,( O"Z,._Approved: .,_,./ Inspected: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ .......................................................................................................................................................... , Comments: ______________________________ _ City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/14/2003 Permit# CB010190 Inspector Assignment: TP Title: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTER Description: 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG Type: COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Job Address: Suite: Location: 1525 FARADAY AV Lot APPLICANT RON GROSS Phone: 0 Inspector: ~ Owner: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE L L C Remarks: AM PLEASE Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Requested By: MARTIN Entered By: CHRISTINE t/L _______ _ E-- Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02014 ISSUED PCR02080 ISSUED MERALD LAKE CORP CNTR-REVISE; ELEVATOR SUMP & MECH ENCLOSURE EMERALD LAKE CORP CENTER; CHANGE TO METAL STUDS PCR03036. ISSUED EMERALD LAKE CENTER-REVISE; INCREASE SPRINKLERS IN LIEU-PROTECT OPEr Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 01/10/2003 89 Final Combo co TP RATED DOOR ASMB @ LOBBY 12/11/2002 89 Final Combo co TP SEE NOTICE 12/10/2002 89 Final Combo NR TP CORR NOT COMPLETE 12/04/2002 89 Final Combo co TP NOTICE ATTACH. 12/03/2002 89 Final Combo co TP PART INSP 09/23/2002 34 Rough Electric AP TP RTU & MECH@ EQUIPTYARD 09/23/2002 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP 09/13/2002 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP TP MECH. ENCL. GAS LN. (LOW PSI) 09/06/2002 23 Gas/Test/Repairs NR TP NOT COMPLETE 08/27/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP ELEV. LOBBY 08/26/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall WC TP 08/26/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP CANOPY SOFFITS,ELEV. AREA 08/21/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding co TP 08/20/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP T-BAR CEIL @ 1 & 2 FLR CORR. . City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request Permit# CB010190 08/20/2002 08/20/2002 08/20/2002 08/16/2002 08/05/2002 08/05/2002 07/23/2002 07/23/2002 07/18/2002 07/18/2002 07/18/2002 07/18/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002 07/11/2002 07/11/2002 07/11/2002 07/09/2002 07/03/2002 07/03/2002 07/03/2002 07/02/2002 07/02/2002 07/02/2002 07/01/2002 06/28/2002 06/28/2002 06/28/2002 06/27/2002 06/27/2002 06/27/2002 06/26/2002 06/25/2002 06/25/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/19/2002 06/19/2002 06/19/2002 06/17/2002 06/17/2002 06/13/2002 06/12/2002 06/11/2002 06/10/2002 06/07/2002 06/07/2002 06/07/2002 24 Roughrropout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 34 Rough Electric 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/W aiding 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 48 Exterior Appliances 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Roughrropout 34 Rough Electric 44 .Rough/Ducts/Dampers 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 34 Rough Electric 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Roughrropout 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 Rough Electric 34 Rough Electric 84 Rough Combo 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 34 Rough Electric 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 34 Rough Electric 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 34 Rough Electric For: 03/14/2003 Inspector Assignment: TP --- WC TP AP TP CEIL LITES AP TP DUCTS, HP S 1 & 2 FLR CORR P.A RB LIGHT FIXTURES@ E & W'EXT. SUN SCREEN OK CO TP T·CEIL@ CORR AP TP MAIN DSTB, HOUSE SUB PNL, TRANS AP TP F.D. @ RESTRM TRANS AIR ALL FLRS WC TP AP TP HARD CEIL @ ELEV. EQUPT. RM WC TP AP TP LITES@ ELEV. EQUPT RM AP TP DUCTS @ ELEV EQUPT RM AP TP N/INCL ELEV. EQUPT. RM. WC TP AP TP 2ND FLR QEIL ABOVE STRS AP TP 2 & 3 FLR ELEV LOBBY CEIL S S WALL AP TP AP TP RESTRMS, S. HIGH WALL, ELEV. LOBBY CEIL 1ST FLR AP TP HARD CEIL @ ELEV. LOCCY 2 & 3 FLR AP TP HARD CEIL @ ELEV. LOBBY 2 & 3 FLR AP TP AP TP ELEV LOBBY HARD CEIL 2 & 3 FLR AP TP AP TP AP TP 2ND & 3RD FLR AP TP RESTRM HARD CEIL AP TP RESTRM CEIL LITES AP TP RESTRM DUCTS, EXHST. CO TP CEIL@ RESTRMS co 44 CO TP NS TP NR TP 3RD FLR AP TP AP TP 1 ST FLR LOBBY SOFFIT PA TP 3RD FLR ELEV. LOBBY SOFFIT AP TP 1 ST FLR LOBBY SOFFIT CEIL LITES AP TP 1 ST FLR LOBBY SOFFIT DUCTS AP TP SOFFIT @ DOOR 1 OOA, STR 1 & 2 ENCL AP TP CORR# 2 EXT., 1ST FLR RESTRM EXT., STR 1 EXT. AP TP CEIL & CLOSER WALLS AP TP 1 & 2 FLR WALLS LOBBY @ ELEV., CORR 2 FLR AP TP PA RB OK@ WEST WALL EXCEPT SERPENTINE WALL PA RB CORRIDOR OK TO DBL DOORS EAST END PA RB 3 BALCONIES S SIDE OK PA RB 1ST & 2ND DECK@ WET SIDE AP TP 2 & 3 FLA RESTRM WALLS, 1ST FLA ELECT RM AP TP EXT LATH@ SOFFITS N/INCL BALCONYS AP TP 2 & 3 FLA RESTRM WALLS, 1ST FLA ELECT RM City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/14/2003 Permit# CB010190 Inspector Assignment: TP 06/06/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP WALLS 1ST FLR RESTRMS & RM 111-113 06/06/2002 34 Rough Electric AP TP 06/05/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP CORR# 2 & LOBBY W/SIDE TO ELEV. (WALLS) 06/05/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP N.SIDE 06/05/2002 34 Rough Electric AP TP EXT. SOFFFITS LITES (8) 06/05/2002 34 Rough Electric AP TP CORR# 2 & LOBBY W/SIDE TO ELEV. (WALLS) 06/04/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP 1ST FLR CORR WALLS/ONE SIDE 06/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR TP 05/31/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP ELEV. CORR UPPER WALL & SOFFIT. 05/31/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP S. ELEV. 05/28/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP STR CORR 1 1ST FLR 05/28/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP e. elev.\ 05/28/2002 34 Rough Electric AP TP 05/24/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP STR. ENCL (2) 05/24/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP 3RD FLR ELEV ENCL. EXT. 05/24/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA TP (ONE SIDE) ELEV. EQUPT RM., ELECT RM 05/21/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP STR ENCL. #2 INT. ALL FLRS 05/21/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP ELEV. SHAFT EXT. 1 & 2 FLR 05/16/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP ONE SIDE STR, CORR 107, 108 05/16/2002 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP EXHST DUCT 2 AND 3 FLR 05/15/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP MECH SHAFT & ELEV. ENCL. 05/15/2002 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers co TP EXHST DUCT IN SHAFT 05/10/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PK N&W EXTERIOR FRAMING RE-CHECK MONO-COAT INSIDE FRAMING 05/08/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP AP MECH SHAFT ENCL (3 TOTAL) 05/08/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP STAIR ENCL, ABOVE CEIL ONLY 05/08/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP MECH SHAFT ENCL CORE BRO (3 TOTAL) 05/08/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP 3 FLR RESTRM ABOVE CEIL 05/08/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall WC TP 05/06/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA TP 1 & 2 FLR RESTROOM ABOVE CEILING ONLY 04/29/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP EXT. FRM S ELEV 04/22/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP EXT. FRM E. ELEV. 04/19/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA TP EXT. FRM FOR GLAZING E SIDE 04/12/2002 24 Rough/Topout AP TP ROOF DRAINS 04/11/2002 15 Roof/Reroof AP TP BACK BRO FOR PARAP. 04/08/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP ELEV. ENCL. @ ROOF 04/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP ROOF STRUCT. FRM. 03/29/2002 24 Rough/Topout AP TP WASTE ALL FLRS 03/25/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP RSH & MECH ENCL S.O.G. 03/15/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP LITE POLE BASE FTNS 03/15/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 03/14/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam co TP 03/11/2002 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP TP SITE LITES 03/06/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 3RD FLR STEEL FRM 03/05/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam co TP 03/04/2002 15 Roof/Reroof AP TP MTLPAN DECK 03/01/2002 15 Roof/Reroof NR TP 02/26/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 1 ST FLR STEEL FRM 02/25/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 3RD FLR MTL DECK PAN 02/22/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam CA TP RE-SCHED 2/25 02/22/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor CA TP City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/14/2003 Permit# CB010190 Inspector Assignment: TP 02/21/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC TP 02/21/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 2ND FLR MTL. DECK PAN 02/21/2002 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP TP MED. PSI LN. YARD TO BLDG. 02/07/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor AP TP F.S.@ MECH ENCL 02/07/2002 22 Sewer/Water Service WC TP 02/05/2002 66 Grout AP TP P.G. @ CLMN BASES 01/17/2002 62 Steel/Bond Beam WC TP 01/17/2002 66 Grout AP TP TSH ENCL 2ND LIFT 01/17/2002 66 Grout AP TP MECH ENCL 3RD LIFT 01/15/2002 66 Grout AP TP TSH ENCL 1ST LIFT 01/15/2002 66 Grout AP TP MECH ENCL 2ND LIFT 01/11/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP S.O.G. REINF 01/09/2002 65 Retaining Walls AP TP WALL DRAINS 01/08/2002 62 Steel/Bond Beam we TP 01/08/2002 66 Grout AP TP MECH ENCL. CMU 1ST LIFT 01/03/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam we TP 01/03/2002 61 Footing AP TP TSH ENCL FTNS 01/02/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP 01/02/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP PIP WALL @ ELEV. 01/02/2002 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP CLMN FTGN, G.B. S COMP 01/02/2002 61 Footing AP TP MECH. ENCL 01/02/2002 66 Grout AP TP S. RET. WALL 12/31/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR TP 12/28/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP SEE PLN LOC. 12/28/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 12/27/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP SEE PLAN LOC 12/27/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 12/20/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TP SEE PLN FOR LOC. 12/20/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP 12/20/2001 61 Footing AP TP S. RETWALL 12/20/2001 65 Retaining Walls AP TP RET WALL DRAINS 12/19/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers co TP 12/19/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam co TP 12/18/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP TP N. END RETWALL 12/12/2001 61 Footing AP GG 12/12/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP GG SEE BACK OF CARD 12/07/2001 61 Footing ·AP GG 12/07/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP GG 11/14/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP TP SWRTOMAIN 11/05/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor AP. TP ., ., City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/07/2001 Permit# CB010190 Title: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTER Description: 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG Type: COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Job Address: Suite: Location: 1525 FARADAY AV Lot APPLICANT RON GROSS Owner: Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 62 Steel/Bond Beam 0 Act Comments Inspector Assignment: TP --- Phone: 7608021049 Inspector: Cd Requested By: VIRGIL Entered By: CHRISTINE _kl_ Ht 11-P ___________ _ Associated PCRs · Inspection History Date Description 11/14/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service 11/05/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor Act lnsp Comments AP TP SWR TO MAIN AP TP , ,---------------------.. ttm;q I A ..A•tt,1 •=•• P" C 'GIIIWl.llKINWa....,p.,..u ,_,ax. .... _.,. ___ _ 7 PLAN H• 3". 8" TYPICAL SECTION 3' ·1"' ffl!BX. TYPtCAL SECTION m'flt' 3' · 8" ELEVATION DIMENSIONS MID R&INFORCING STEEL NOTES ,r 1. See Stand<llrd Or&Wings C· 7 an«! C-8 for mdditian.11 mnu end deraib. 2. Fill all block tells with trout. H {ftlllt) T 4miD) W(mml IA) bars i~) m ffllX.tM Jll'IIIIIII, (pd) s• • .. H 0'-10" s·. r 14 0 18"' I 6 • 16" 700 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWING DRAWING C-2 NUMBER MASONRY RETAINING WALL TYPE 2. (LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE OR SLOPING BACKFILL} r-r O". 16" :r. 9" - # 4. 11" &&(I ·-------,-----,----,-.----- - --.-.'*' -~· _._.._._ ---~ _.., " .. _ • ·-..,,._..., ....... iv-..-i..-1/-'' \ . 1 1 "-"'d. .... W .... -"M'-'VU6 .&WV.AV ~·'·~·:~( \2 01 11:Sla PARTNERS ENGINiERING 858 S95 31'17 ~· ~ '~ :, {, .......... __ 101 .... ~ Ed;e of Footing...,. PLAN H"' !'-"• H• 3'-8" !·. ....t---I c ' io 11' ::c - NOTES TYPICAL SECTION Mr ,•-4• t. See S(Qndcrd Dmwings c-7 and C•8 fClt' oddH.lonot no\at and dalll!11. 2. FiU 1111 titoct cell1J with grout. ELEVATION OIM£N$10NS mo H {1ffll1) J' -go T (min) o· -,. w (min) 2' -,j'· A bot'I l4.32a a OOf3 - C IKn - 0 ~.I f 4 8 32° E btlB I ·HCJtol 4 fflDL illOil 1,fOO pmn. (psf) SAN DIEGO REGIOMAJ. IT AND.ARD DRAWING MASONRY RETAINING WALL TYPE 3 (Level Bac:ltfill) TI'PICAL SECTION , • .,, ... fl'IQII AtllfrORCING STEEL ~--,t·' a· -o· C:I' -HJ"! 1• -o· '$-'r 4' • I,. , ."in, #4032" I,.,• lf I 4 e 32· --I e o 1&· I ,, • tt" f e • to· f Hold~ I , 1oto1 s 1,IIOO :1.200 c .. 3 p.2 I I . .... »--------------1 STAUCl'IIIW. PIOTlS, DETlill. OR 1'FIS U!Eti: ,..,~ '"'•' a • ·--• •• ,_ -•--a.P HE~PIKS, n-.Mfflii: ---· ' -a,1-------------fi .fd.!tJ_ :f,:t!;_:ti;_ ~e, Ml~ ,•,1~.d.'o, :fit: ~ n«a4 .-~hw:11i, Ur,.., . .,.,.,,.,·~. ___ oe'f:Ml( ~ :fi:srtl!)-_ J.'e::tii~ p:.rtbi.(,"d' 'l ·~ 10 :.:._ f>n.£,7:: _ _f, 11,.,.wt{ ~,:, -~ t_,'!ft ~~---fr:,~ l~~ti!Ml....-~orwi1t&tt:,l e.".l.-!J.Ls/4iA. 7"'-.&d_,'<N,t: ,~ #tt ~ tfll~ ~ I' ~h. &,i~i-f~t:. . '!'.'tfed!Jr ~ ~nJ. -*"½ _.i,_111,.__:k w.~~ • ihii~Jifilfid~_wu:~---rn~: ~v~&t e;,~ru{ k,~:eet:'ib --~~- w11>.TM!A: SAfllPl.!S TAKEN: 1t},'r--;;,,-~~ Dt:,,f-h~ -f-,-j°.,.'o/'"'ni# sn1 TIii£ STAAT: ___ i.:flR._.l,_ ___ _ -LUNCH PERICO:-------- w~,, llS'I'$ AEQ\llflB>: SITE TIMI: FINISH: ..S; ,0 AM TRAVEL TIME: ___ ,---"7 __ h __ r __ _ i's I 00 Ct:RTlfY THAT I HAI/£ PERSONALLY ODSERVEO .ALL OF THE WOR!< llSiEO ABOVE ANO THAi' THIS WORI< COMPLIES Wl'l'H TH SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMEMDATUiHS, ANO/ on THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS ~ND APPllc.MLE SarftON OF THE BUii.DiNG CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE 01:FICIENCV REPORT --~ J:J--:. 12 ,_(.....J..£J_ -·--·· ---·-··---iiiim{11u·• ~ Dall ol ~rt 1cso c:,nlflc:~n ~moor . ~1P-_.:fo\\~tNJ '-~~---. ----..... __ ~. MTGl, INC. 2992 t la Palma Ave, Suitt A Anaheim. CA 9280& f nspection Repon Project Name~.R~.2> ~~~ ?c?~~. _&nfe,..:z. P.ige:_/_ of __ /Report tt:_c,_,,. ___ _ Project Address: /,fJ U' ~Mrly ~.~>----- Architect:~------------------ Englneer: ______ ~---::.----------- Contractor: ~ J7~ al9vnr .s. 7 7 Permit#: --------------File#: -------------- D SA#: ____ ----------- Other: INSPECTION MATERIAL SAMPLING Qty MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CH!CKLIST Structural Steel H.S. Bolts H.S. Bolts .....----ptans/Specg Masonry Prisms C~.PSI Clearances Concrete MortartGrwt Grout PSI f'ooitloos ......---r:1reproofing Cone. Cylll1ders Mortar PSI ...---Sizes Other: Fireproof Steel Ulp$ Other: other: Eleci./Wire Consolidatlon Other: other: ..,,,,. Firepra:t fj/,,.;?,,,£ 5";1.,2:/.;>,d... Torque A.lbs: . other: other: other. Ottlet. Other: Othet': Other: other. M .-9T-4? 4-/ @= -:;1-t..._ V ,-, A--1. .,-,,-d< o /" ~ ':-,.../ _8'._ ;::_cl ~ /t:P f.1"""77 ,:z ... ~ /~7 /9~.,;,,i. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications end eppllcabla sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected andJJ(le&-AQJ. co,;:.w,""uJt.i--pplnlon or project control. Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cort: _ ......... 3.,_5.....,0..__ ___ _ i .. ./.. ~·,··~-·/--·-._ ........................... ____ ._f._,= .. -... 1 .. ·~--· .. ·-........... 1·· .. ··· ... .;: ............... ~ ---····--.......................... ~~-.............. -r,···· ._. __ ........ , ........... ·-···--·-r-,·-;,; ............. ;··· · iv..! ---' D . 4• I?/ J!--Da s· ? Ll. ~J!:!1\5E: .. ~l~i ............... --.-... Bi .. 1?..~.r .. l.: .. _ .. _1.?. Z.... ! 08;' 2: __ .... i ....... /'W ~ 0.~~~., ... ···-··-' ·-~ ......... ··j·····~~..,_··-··-··'··· ............ ?-.... --·-·---;~.-·~·--·..! .......... ~ .......... \ ~ ... 11~.~~~.i ............. ~---··· ._:.:_e. .................. ·-·-···-···· .. •·• ........ ~ ... f: ~ .. ....... ; I . ~ .. -----···-·· ······j-···-;;,-:··························· ............ ~····j····~·~· ......................... -········1 I Time Stal?.: /I.·<> ! /1-, .<?.·----~ ... J . .;?: __ .9 __ ...................... ·-··-·'······ .... : ... (:?. .. ___ .................... ____ ...................... . ·-c~·of r•;;;i"autim~ IQ; •. ___ ............. . ................ . 11/29/2001 10:39 FAX 619+4647973 ~002 sent by: fUH ~ieict insp, .. ~ ::. . City of San Diego lnspec!lon Services Division Planning and Development Review 9801 Ridgehaven Court • Suite 220 • MS 1102-B San O!e~o, CA 92123 Tt<" c,.,... o~ :i .... 0,.,.... lnforma11on (858) 492-5070 • FAX (858) 492·5098 Certificate of Compliance for ·. Off-Site Fabrication • (MUST 13E FILED WITH THIS OFFICE AND APPROVED PRIOR TO ERECTJO~ OF FABRICATED COMPONENTS)._ .. FABRICATION CO, NAME WEST COAST IRON. INC. TELEPHONE NO. C 619 464-8456 FABRICATION SHOP ADDRESS 9302 JAMACHA ROAD FAX NO. ( 619 464-7973 SPRING VALLEY CITY _________________ _ STATE CALIFORNIA ZIP CODE ___ 9 ___ 1 ____ 9 ___ 7 __ 7 __ BUILDING PERMIT NO,/S CB010190 -----~-----PLAN FILE NO. __ i _C"B_o_· 1_-_1_9_0 _______ _ (for projeels Wllh multiple permit num11ers IJUI Wlm 111a sama ptan file number, ~ou may Ii:! ail i:ermit numbers and.~ddrllS!os on a seperelll 6heel.) JOB SITE ADDRESS __ 1_s2_s_F_AR_A_D_AY_A_V_EN_U_E..;..,_C_A_R_LS_B_A_D.,.,_, _C_A __ _,,.... _________ _ DESCRIPTION OF COMPONENTS FABRICATED STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS, BEAMS AND " MISCELLANEOUS STEEL. ., FABRICATOR IS CURRENTLYCEFiTIFIE:O 13Y (refer1o BNL 17·6): 01cao Xto<Ar$c OACI OPC! Opti )[] other CITY AF L, A, Certifh:ate No._, 1..,5..,.2_,4 ________ Expiration Date 01-Ql -Q? SPECIAL INSPECTOR ASSIGNED (SY Bl.111.0ING OWNER) MJ(:jU · Cartlfloate No. ______ _ (Not r0q111red for a fabric:ator regls1srei:1 end appravgd by lhe City of $1111 Ole90, unless alhar,,j:!e 1101ed on lhO appr.ovod permlitl!ld pl!llls a11d specWcatlona.) FABRICATION DRAWINGS REVIEWED AND ACCl!PTl:O av DESIGNER OF RECORD?i fi:YES [J NO STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLANS, DETAILS & CALCULATIONS REVIEWED ANO APPRt;)VED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO SUILOING OFFICIAL? . @(YES ONO . FABRICATION COMMENCEMENT DATE ..;:l=l,_/5"'"'/ ... 0""1__, ___ FABRICATION CO~[ PI..ETION DATE 12/02/01 We hereby certify that the components described and listed herein comply With the ap1rroved permitted plans, speclflcatlcns and workmanship ptovfslons or rhe California Building Cade as amendecl by ,he City of San Ji)iego and other applicable regulations. We further certify that each fabricated member or component has been Inspected and moots all the requiremenrs of the Cali torn!~ Bt1llding Coda as amended by The City of San Diego and other applicable regulations. We further cenify that each fabrlc:ated member ct' component listed herein shipped to the project Job site with an identifying mark or rag. We ur,derstand this cer1ificata shall be submitted to the Inspection Services Division and the architect/ engineer of record~ erection of rhe fabricated members and components. NOTE: Tills certification Is llmlted to fabrication of the components or members described above to be used in the structures Identified by the permit numbers shewn and is not transferrable to any other fabrication work or oth11r construction sites . I Name (Print): ENRIQUE RAYON . , ,. .Title: VICE PRESIDENT Any person signing this appllcatlon as an agent of the fabrication company declares under'penalty of perjury to be an authorized agent of record of the fabrication company having the authority to execute this document. :,:~::,'_"_th-ls _____ --~:2:9:t:h:::::::-d-ay-of::N:o:v:e_m~~~~~;--:TH::::_-_, ___ 2_0_0_1.,~EA-R ___ _ This informalion is a'/ailable in alternaUve format& for per.sons'i'lith disabilities. To reguest this information in alternative format, call {619) 236-7703 or (800) 735-2929 ITT) DS-311 (3·00) 11 " :, 08/05/02 MON 06:37 FAX 7607417935 BERG--SPD \ BergelecMc Corp. Contractors & Engineers -) August2,2002 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR l~JSTALLATION EMERALD LAKE:, CARLSBAD, CA To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised, the electr·rcal switchgear at Emerald Lake, Carlsbad, California, were assembled according to manufacturern specifications including torqueing of all buss bolts, wire lugs, and joining hardware. Please call if you have questions regarding th~ above. Sincerely, 650 Opper Street, Escondido, CA 92029 Tel (760) 746-1003 Fax (760) 741-0918 C10-#65046 {4]001 ,..... 0 . .-:_ , . . ._.,..,. -,o--- -:_' :· . ., -~:, ·=-: ~---'; ~-- /J.OWIR/g£f:.~lf.1' .::fin Hayward * Fresno * Sacramento * Santa Ana * San Diego Customer: j_ SWGR. PNL. Identification: (. ~IE'.""(v1~ U (...It Mfg.I Type Style no. R~ng: Amp Time Remarks GROUND FAULT RELAY TEST REPORT Location: ELECTRICAL TEST DATA Relay Trip @51°./4 Control Voltage ___ j µ / A, __ _ Neutral Insulation Resistance I ::2..'.=> 1'--1 JL 7905 Silverton Avenue, Ste. 101 San Diego, California 92126 JB58) 536-9051 (858) 536-8380 Fax 0 Seconds Seconds Seconds ... ( '\ &NGll'tl&M CONTRACT~ Corporate: -<.j; 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2889 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: u 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT 0 llt#ECTOA (l't) fOft WEEK ENDING .. , .. c, I RIPOflT NO. PWIPILE 1110. Branch: 441 w. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0000 Fax: 760.482.0650 sPl!CS i~ I (loll 0 REPORTING UQUIUMENTS: ICBO f'IBLD INSPBCTION MANUAUMTOl. son.. MANUAL RE ll!W PREVIOUS RBPORI'S AND LISTS IP 'mERE IS NON-CONPORMINO WORK AT THE! END OF THE WORK 011.Y, OR MISSING MTRS,AND ms. ETC., FILL OUT AND ATI'ACH A DEFICIENCY RBPOll:t' W~ A DBPJCIJ!NCY, YOURS OR A .PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, JS CORREC.'raD, SO NOl'B ON THE ORIOINAL. DEFJCIE!NCY REPOR'f AND SUBMIT A coJ>'l/'wrrH YOUR WimK'S REPORI'S. &At.llPI.ES TAKEN: TUTII A!OUII\EO: LIJNCft PERIOD:--------- Sile TIME FUtl&H: / 2; I !S" mAVEL TIME: __ /_k...,lll-'J .... C __ VERIFIED IY:J • l 00 CERTlfY THAT I HAVE PF.RSONA!.LY OBSERVED Ai.L OF THE WORK LISTI:!) A&O\lfi AffO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITti THt OIL INVESTIIYIT!ON RECOMMENOATIOJiS. ANO I OA THE AH'ROVED PLAHS, Sfl£CIFICATlONS AND APPLICABLE SECTICIM Ofl THE llUILOING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE OeFICIENCV REPORT ----~-~ ___ \f I Z61 0 \__ 8!gnllurt \ Date of Rf Pot! IC60 Ctrtlficalion Numlm -~V\. vJ<a. rf """--Pflnt tkiMt Clly J C®nly ~-· Aw. 7197 (Jj Corporate: Branch: Branch: " 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 7313 Carroll Road, Sufte G San Diego, CA 92121 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Fax: 714.632.2974 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Toi: 7130.482.0600 FIELD REPORT CONTINUED Fax: 760.482.0850 , §CfNIM! PRJ NO. l ·-· ---! 'i 1----------------------------------------------l----------·--------J 1---------------------------------I -----··7; ---... -----------------J ! ----·-·-----·-·-··---__ _J; 1------------------------------------------. ----1! ~------------------------------------------------------------- 1--------~~~:-~~-=-~ -------------==-~=-~11~ jl-: -------------------·--· -·-··------.:-~11 t :--~ .... -. ----------ii L-~ ----------__ -__ -_-_---:-.J7_-~-----,~~--~-~--~==~:~-~~\ ===~~/\~..__.. -----Si9natur0 ~~ ~ ~l"fft"r ----'----;;-p,":'.':'int~Na=m:-, --""-"--- Ctrhlica11on N•,mllfl/ -· · · ·· ----· 11/06/2001 10:27 FAX 619+4647973 !41003 sent oy: ~UK tieio ,nsp . .... (MUST BE FILED ONE BUSINESS· DAV PRIOR TO SCHEDULED FABRICA:t'I0N COMMENCEMENT DATE)~ DATE _.._.N..,_QV.,.__.__, ..,,2~.-2 ..... no..,_1.__ __ SCHEDULED FABRICATION COMMENCEMEN:[ DATE __ 1_1_/_0_S_/O_I ____ _ FABRICATION co. NAME WEST COAST IRON, I NC, TELEPHONE NO. ( 619 ----------~---"------464-8456 FABRICATION SHOP ADDRESS 9302 JAMACHA ROAD FAX NO. ( 6] 9 464-7973 CITY _...,.S:..:::B=B.=IN=G'---"'VA..:.::L=L=EY.,__ _______ _ STATE _ _,.C ... A ____ _ ZIP CODE _ _.9..._J_,_97.._7'--_ BUILDING PERMJT NOJS _C_B_Ol_O_l_9_0______ PLAN FILE NO, _C_BO_l,....--..;;.1..;;.90..;;._ _______ _ !Fot projects wnn mulllple permit numoers l>ut with 1110 same p13n tile number, you lll•Y list all pgrmi\ numbers ana ~lldresses on a sspat111e st,ooq JOB SITE ADDRESS _ __;;_15;;,.;2;,,..;5_..;..;F A..;;.R;,;..A~OA;.;.Y:.....;_;A_VE_N_U~E.::..., _;C..;..;A..;:;;LR..;.:S;,,..;B,;..;A,;...D ,~C_;_A__;.9_2_69-;7,,_. _________ _ DESCRIPTION OF COMPONENTS TO BE FABRICATED _...:S=-T~R:.i::U:.::::C.:..:TU~R~A.:.:::L__.,_ST....,E::.eE,..,L~CO""L,._,,U,.,__M!!.!N~S~, _.Bs.=E,,_,A:w.M"""S .._, ___ _ AND MISCELluANEOUS STEEL. OACI OPCI Opti FABRICATOR IS CURRENTLY CERTIFIED BY (refer ta BNL 17•6): 0 ICB0 fn(Al~C OOther CITY QE l .A. #1524 CertiticateNo. _____ ..,..... __ ExpirationDate ____ _ SPECIAL INSPECTOR ASSIGNED (BY eulLCING OWNS;!) MTGL :: Cer11flcate No. ______ _ !Nol r;qlJirad lor II fab:l:a101· re:gis1erea and epp1avsd t>y 1t1a Chy o! San ol~!)D, ,mte~~ DlherWi5a 11oted on 1he app!~v~:.t pcrmIned plflris ~nd &pecifi::atl~r.ij.1 FABR1CATION DRAWINGS REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED BY CESIQNER OF RECORD? Q YES ONO NOTE: THE FABRICATOR IS R5QU!RED TO !-IA.VE FABRICATION DRAWINC:lS WHICH HAVE BEEN REV,lEW5D AND ACCEPTED BY THI: DESIGNER OF RECORO, SPECIAL INSPECTOR MUST VERIFY SUCH ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO COMMENCING INSP~CTION OUTIE;S. AG81:6MENI We heroby agree to he.vs contl"uoua spGclal lnspee1fan, sampling end \asune as specified on 1ho approve'?. parmlttacl plans and ~peci6oatloll!l. We wftl fu11h~r a9r1111 ll'lllt 11111 work wttl be performed rn the manner pr,1scr!bed by the Ca!ilornia Bul!dlng Code and lh8 Steindards 11,2: amende!I by Tl19 c,iy al Sari Oiego atta olher regulations, .: We understand that th-s property owna1 or thG engineer/ arcliil~I of recol'd nc!lng as t~e property own'i!r's ~eunt Is solely (cspons·ble for employmenl at one or more special lnspec1or~ Who ,hall provide i"spectlons for fabriG:irion of the compOnl!lnts described horeln;!We also egr8\I to provide un!lmlleil aci;e&li to the fabrlcauon areas, thD material storage and mixing tire~. other rotated areas, the ~pproved shop drawings J1,lld other documenls for lhe purpClS& of Inspection, sampling Md tesllng by 1116 speclat lnspec:tors. c~nstn1c.1fon materials 1esling labora10ry or Planning and Oel{elopment AuVl9W petiannel durlne normal wor!<IO!l hours. We !ttrtl!et agree ta p1ovlde en klel\llfyl"g mark on each tabrlcaced member • or component shipped ta lh8 et1nSfll.lOllon site. A certilic;ale ol complianee llml' a shipping !isr !!hall ecoompany eaoh i;hlpment arid a cllpy shall be sem \o lhil lmpection Ser11ce11 Division and the architect gr engineer of tecorit when the ~mponants ar11 shipped. 0 APPROVED Thi, agroemenl is llmtted lo la.btlea~on of the cornpommlii or members described FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ODENIED 0 CORRECT ANO RESUBMIT a1iove 10 be used In the 5l11Jc:lures ic!enlified by the p11rrnl1 numbers shown and Is no1 vansfarrabla la 811)" other fabrk:allon work or other e0nslrucibn s~es, COMMENTS: _____________ _ Name (Print): _E_N_R_IQ_U_E_R_AY_O_N _______ _ Title: VICE PRESIDENT Date: __ 1_1/_2_/_0l_ Any per.an signing !hiG .appllcaUon e? an agent of 1ne tabrl~lion comp;my declares under penalty al pe111ry 10 be an a1J1horlzed agent al reco1<1 ol 1/19 fabri,;a1l0n 1:ompany havir,g the tl:y to es:ecute lhl!I ao-:ument. NAM!: (Print): ______________ _ SIGNATURE: DATE: This information is available In alternative formats for persons ~!th disabilities. To request this information in alterna!ive formal, call (619) 236-7703 or (800) 735·2929 ITT) OS·313 (3-00) ~ (f-eoi u/s/o, Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A, Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 www.mtglinc.com Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G, San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 July 8, 2002 Director of Building and Safety City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project No: 3022A01 Log No: 02-1011 RE: SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION PERFORMED UNDER PERMIT NO. CB0 1090 Emerald Lake Corporate Center 1525 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA To the best ofmy knowledge, all of the work, from November 6, 2001 to May 6, 2002, requiring special inspection for reinforced concrete, fireproofing, welding, testing, and construction observation for the structure constructed under the subject permit is essentially in conformance with the approved plans, specifications, RFis, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. LIMITATIONS Our verification applies to conditions, in the subject areas, observed and/or tested by us as of the date of the report. Our firm is not responsible for work not observed by us or for any changes, which may occur outside of our purview, or after our inspections. Our work is considered to be In accordance with the usual standarc;ls of the profession and with local practice. If you should have any questions concerning this report, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, MTGL, Inc. Jlc~ Thomas C. Hare Senior Materials Engineer Cc: Emerald Lake Corporation Scott Company Keeton Construction Newport National Corporation Nadel Architects, Inc. ,; : ,_:' <'..· :· . I ! . ·. I J 04/19/2002 FRI 11:39 FAX 714 632 2974 MTGL-ANAHEIM OFFICE ~0011001 ,; ~~ American Weldin~l~~-l~IY , ,,-.'' Cenifif,i Tllm WELDING JNSPEqT()R William H Burke flu, <·nmpli~d wilh Ille 1cqulremcn1, of s;c,ion 6.(oJ-. 1-hc_A_W_~-s-,11-nd-nrd lbr Quolllicorion ~nd Certillcm!.)o nf Weltllnic Tn,pet;fQrl, QC t-96 wilh __ :Jcut ~ eye c~rrmioo. __ colnr blind £.Z-2:. .. ____ ;; . 01060131 ~~inr • Conmr•i.eNumber . a,.,ptz &« ,.... ' __ J.1:1.~, .... e-::"2..,...00~4-,\(,jii: .. 1,fic,1,on Ch,ir Ro,,c~ify ~y , Cc;iunty ofQrange Planning ~~d D~tc~opiµcnt Services B~~~~~g !~~c,ti.9D. Services ~ , ;,,;rt:.: 1 .'. ',-;· , , " REGISTERED.. SPECIAL INSPECTOR •.. • \j \ • •. • \ BURKE, WILL~'·: '. No. 1194 1\: . The individual na~~~:~ve ill authorized to perform the speci.u impeotio~JisJe4 on the,rev~rse of this ca.rd, in the uninwrporated W!!'IS,Qf,thc. c9.~ly of Orange. ;, • I ' ' ~', I I t O • Valid from July,, 1~ -~QO l .to J~ne 30, 2002 .. , International . I conference cf Building Offic:fals ' WILLIAM H BURKE i Cl!RTIFIE!D SPECIAL--IN$PECT0R STRUCTURAL S'l'.-EEL AND WELDINO 1997 UBC AND 2000 IIIC: The_lndfVldual named hereon IS CERTIFIED In the category s11own, having been so certlfl~d pur~uant to successful completion of the prescribed written exan,1n.it1on, • e;:~ir;;tion oate. January i:Z, 200,1 No. 505SOG0•8S ~ ~ ~ fj ('Uf.· r,,:(~ . otvai7.miefs srghe75ffirtificafo holder. ICIHJ r:~rrifir:,1tio11 ~HC's/, to.,i:ompet~m k11owlo(l~l' (1( codes and 5tandards Applicab/11 ~~pP.r/1mr~ pwu/tl ]Jc v~rifieii_oy i'cir.al iuri.1di1/Q,11, · f . ····-· l WELDING CERTtFICATION l l i ! LASNO. 97-026 OATEOFTESTlL.22/97 THIS IS TO c·ERTIFY THAT' ·MAc1CcoiE-·-·5·s4~r.;.;s'337 --· ----------•• -j HAS SATISFACTORILY COMPJ.GJ'J:0 ANOJPASSED THE WEI.I). ING TEST REQUIREMENT$ o-,.FJ} D l • •. . - ; fORMl1~ RECORD OF WELDING OPERATOR'S ~~ QUALIFICATION TEST PROCESS.....sl:lA,..Y ___________ _ REMARK!QUALIFlED TO xm;LD SHEET STEEL ALL POSITIONS. SHEET TO SHEET & SHEET TO SUPPORTING .MEMBER. . .. .. . . . .. .. ... .. .. ~·· .. ··~ ...... -..... -........ _ .......... ~. ~-.,. ,, ,, -~ • • ,< -·:lij ,.. ;' ;"._t ... ___ , __ .. _,,_.._ _____ _ .. ..... , :-. ., ... .,. -:., .. ' j f ' ; ••. j .... --~----..... ,j 7 f> ; j .. ,i;.,:J II I• I •,,' -l " -~, I ! Corporate: 0 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: ·O 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE. SOIL REPORT (YI (N} SPECS {Y) (N) APPROVED Pl.ANS (V) {N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING {Y) (N) FOR WEEK ENO ING OI REPORT NO, PG Of PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NO. C-/3010/ '70 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATIACHA DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTE_D, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERlALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: REMARKS. JNCLUD/#0 Mftm#Q$: REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY; PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION· WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE: TESTS REOUIRED: SITE TIME START; _______ _ .. . ,i'i' 1 : ./ ,IJ ,. LUNCH PERIOD: --------TRAVEL TIME:---------VERIFIED BY: 1~ /4.,· /,..,_ 1 /4',;t/f:,;;.:,,~"' SITE TIME FINISH; _______ _ I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED All OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH TH~OIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ANO APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT Wts}&t-J._ __ · __ Signature · 1-l,:11Jk &,JI, '(1? 101. Date of Report , .s~ ()..3 s-<>I:> o-sr-· ICBO centflcatlon Number Print Name City / County Certification Number a ...... ,111., 0 Corporate: · · ·· 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: ·O·· 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537 .3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 ///19/ /);)_ FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WORK C9'tffSPECT0R OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (NI r,,) ,., P ,,.o:~ ~ APPROVED PLAN~(N) ARCH'JJ J4 c/ ~ / 7rJ..-,r FOR WEEK ENDING 1/ / ::Jn/ ;') 2. ENGIN~ REPORT NO. -, ¥/5:..AJ £,, .. en ~ CONTRACT~ ./. v PLAN FILE NO. .ee E)J.I - PG Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (VJ (NJ APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) {NJ f PROJ2a;;..2Rt:J/ I OF I lPERMITN0. (!R /'J/C)I 9/'J SUB·CONTRAC?t / Jd ..es ~O'\I PROJECT NAME E /1 M~ p lt1/.. LA.K'F INSPECTION ADDRESS Cft11rl.sbnd ~ ~,., ADDRESS OF PROJECT L" as .FA.-e nd,,,;v .S~1<4C REPORTING REQUffiEMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATI'ACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED SY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES 08S,VED'..L> ,1,.., .s:...::J.•.. _,., ~·1 _, .,;,' n.1.1 -:! v /~) t'>.lcfl.t?_J l-1 a ""'c-: ,:;, r /,,,,, f'l" .,.,;Af...,.,,. .:/, tl,/V S I F (!.I l,a.,l v v 7 /lool( 1-e.-v ~ 42 ··~ '2d fl~ ,;:.1'-/. 0/ 0 F ;0IJ11J '5.liv'd J1-1c.l ; r ~ ~ J, 'f.t. e G. s. (2 fd. ./_~ ~-/cl~ I I wdd.s. ,A1 )? e. ~, ·s "'1.<1. 1!.f. /l C ~ $::f. l&.hi-e. STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USEC,: REMARKS, /NCLUD//fa MEETl#DS: BEWOBK AS eEBCE~I OE ALL WOB!i IODAY: eEBCENI EBQJECI CQMeLEIIQ~· WEATHER: WAA SAMPLES TAKEN: ~ TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: (.)-(4«.«f) SITE TIME START; _______ _ SITE TIME FINISH; _______ _ LUNCH PERIOD:--------TRAVEL TIME:-------- I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED All OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE S IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, ANO/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS_ ANO APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT {,4._)/4.IJ!~ ..... !2_ .... -----s7vnaTure J/eu.1/( '5111£'€. Print Name '-/ I /9 u::J:L Date of Report ..S03 S q$tJ -8'S-- ICBC Certification Number City I County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 • ll1 Q.. fl'J II) (T) .. ... .... N 0 0 C\I L l'O :I: ,,. Strllctural Syst~Ills-lnspection· -Awards this 9e:ftificate to --- .. :-· -.,. A .. :••-d-----• 'J:·: -> ---------·· > •---.. -.am.· ames. -··· .· .... ·--.. . . -.. --.... :: ... :> : .. : ... t· .. : . __ :. ''.'_>_·"-. _ .. · .... ::·". __ :·.:/_t----.:-~--_-;. .. ~-.. _. .. _·_.->_---:'_ .... _. .. -.-:·:_._· ·:_ ·: ... ,."'. .. ·.,_·._:_.·: .. ::~_-.-.... .-:· .', ·_ .. : _ ·.· ... · .. · . -· · .. In--recogn_1tion __ of. !J:ayi~g s,ri:~~ts~fµ,ly c~~plet.ed .. ~: ·getleral;~p~c;dic/ _ _.--. .. : ·. . . . · ..... ·· .. >. ·. -~rid_.p~acti~al~x.afuin_ati6.µ·~.i~~~~-4-::·J~.:'..th~-)~i~ujtefu~fit~f.Qf.~N:+~fc~lA., · .. , · .. i: : .. ;.--·: .. . : .. ANSii~Wt{'t>l~1, and Stf~ttu-r,a.f:SY~~eµ1slri~pecUQ~--~~t~e·i.i ... p~6tedµ_t~s~·-.· ·-· .. ·:··. ·:. :----.··: ·: -. · ---.-~ · :· .. _: .· A·,nea~ vision ~~uity··;has··-·he~ti'~d111i#is~~re<{a~~-passea~: __ ._: ·:·· :·::_:-:: . : _ ....... : -.. · ... ·· ·.; ·_. . .·... .·_: ;:: ___ : ... ·.:··.-··.. :·.. . . ' -.. >"'-,: '" .· : ... _ ,··._···: .. -' 'dl/ . ·.· . :, ·. · .:· dERTIF.I.CATE 1~U~BtR · .. · ·. -·. ·. · .. · :"_. _.:. ·, ... · · ·. CER;~~{oN riA:E ........ ·_ .. . : ·:·· .. ·. ·_. ,d!:r .: __ ·.·.·_--· ..... ·. - . RECERT1FICATION ·DATE ... ·: . . _:· .· ~.. : ,-: ~ :.. : . ·:· :· ·. ·-:::: _· . ·. . . ·-. . ... -. ·,~ . . . . : ·-. . . . . . . It-ti;-[ ,.· . \~I\ tO ' Q.. IV (D (T) .. ..... ..... N 0 0 N L IIJ I: ., <- Structural Systems Inspection Awards this Certificate to Mike Langdale In recognition of having successfully completed A: general,specific, and practical examination. Based on the requirements of SNT-TC-lA, ANSI/AWS Dl.1, and Structural Systems Inspection written procedures. A near vision acuity has been administered and passed. oL CERTIFICATE NUMBER ---"-.2.-'-M~4:::;t. 0.....-L-I __ CERTIFICATION DATE £/oy RECERTIFICATION DATE Ultrasonics Level II r-- 1:!.. IV r-- (T) .. ... ... (\J 0 0 C\J L IIJ E Structural Systems Inspection Awards this Certificate to Mike Langdale In recognition of having successfully completed A: general,specific, and practical examination. Based on the requirements of SNT-TC-LA., ANSI/AWS DI.I, and Structural Systems Inspection written procedures. A near vision acuity has been administered and passed. Magnetic Particle Level II 01 CERTIFICATE NUMBER 2M-4ye>/ G \TIONDATE S-/4,y RE_C_E_R_f.__fiIFI.-4-CA_T_I_O_N_D_~_T_E BER r en . ,. Q.. IIJ m (T) ... ... (\J 0 0 rJ I.. IQ ::c .:. --·:··. -02-~§W =-~~~~:s-~i ,-c-·--:-: · _, · ·-· · --::: -.--,---__ · ~---·AW-ard~i--:tliis_---.:cei~tific·ate·==-:_to: :_ ----------------- • _i .: ---. • • ' • ' • •• ' • l --• • _.., • • • • -• - ·-: · \LUis .. A .. ----_HUtchins--. -. _. . . . . . . --. . ·. -: . . 00 lJ 3 T, ;u (I) :D -z a, fll :;u . .. . .. . . . .... ' . .· . -··' ·, . ~ · .I~i r~cognition ·-of h~yi~g-_s~ccessfuliy -~tim:pl~_~ti.4, .A:~-g~!).er~tse~cif;ic, _ ~ . . ... ·· ... ·.' . :· .... : .. .-. ·,. -. ; .-. :·, ... ·._-._·. . -·; . : ... :-· .· . _:, . . . 0 ___ ... __ -'atl~-;pr~~~i~~~-e~a~i_na~~µ~--~~~~-9* th~ _f~qµ~_re9.1-en~J~f St{f-:TG~J:A~ -_ .-. ~ -.. ·. . .. . -.-. .. . ·. -.· . .. ·... . . , . . . . rn ·· .-· _:4~SI/A:~~J~l. .. f~ ~d:·~tt",u<;~µ~ :~yst~m~ ~rispec®n.-writ,e~-.Pr~e~ures. . · . ~ -· .--. • . . . . .. . . .. • . .·. . -_,. .. . . . , • . . ID -: ·· .. ·_=-.-: :-. ·:-·:-:·. , .. _ . .-A,:n~ar_ v.i~iorfa~uity·~a$-~e~ admi,:t;i$tered_-~nd._p~ss,ed/· ·-'. ·_.. . ' ~ .... • • •::-~-. ._ .. ..,_ •• -.. -.,~-.. : .• ·== :: ··-. -~-: • . .. _ ~-· . -. •.·. ' .:.· . ~. . . . . --·· ::-_"-·/.: .·· ; _.·:.:~----;';__-. =:·~~---< ., \ ·:;'.;:;:~:t:·~,:'it· :::;t:,{;=t:;};~.;:t}I¢1;:}:i)"~:iJt?i5:1\t1;I;itf iji'.ti,'.,j}ftttJbf,;;.?{,f 1i~f a·-· :~:+:_r:'··u· -··-=··,~:if·:ti·r··.·:-' :·-'.~ -~r~i-~:?fi~-'m· ·->:~-~-'::--:13,~~'.ti~:A~-~~ .. :Ai~f.-· '.··; .... ·: ...... ,.-;.-.i~~----:·-i. :.,· . .- c,,1:;· . · = '\,;;·l,:U · · a1 -~~·,,-· :;L~i. ~ :·: __ ~~-~-';l'.,·;E~~:U·~-~-IJ~~ll~- : ... .-.. _ :.: . . <,. . ,., ~ ... .~.:·_ -;::., •.· ~ ·.··· .-. . ·.:.:·I:'_,-:,.· -..... .--.· -·. ·"---'. ·:·· f' c;;, ._.-·,·-,-·-·:--. ·.---.~ ,·. < m . N ·· .. ~-... -:-, . . -.·. [ .. '': !". ·-. t.>,.: ~:: . _.··.: .. _ .. ~;_.,-:r.-·:·.·:··:r::·\/_\:: .. t=:·~ w Gt !fl . :,\" ·-.·· . _-.,._,J•'._ -:·.r ·.:_-·----.... r .,• ·•, .· .·-. .. :'.,. ;.·.:,. • ';.I•"··· •• -... ·-~ • 7 ~ • .. :. N w C'.l ro l'-U) I)) ....l w w }- UI 0 z .. ~Ill~~~i'tiort of,iia~hg.sii~sfiiny ~ln~ieiJ' );.;~~~~/' · .• ·->: .. ·· ... · ·._ :_-~J4· .rir~~~~~ ~i~~.~a~6~/-~!~~~i-~~-\hfi:re~Jif.~~¢.~t~ -~fS}it~ tc~1A,·:··.:·.·-::\. -~- ~'.-_ ·· ~-ANsitAws·~o1_~-t~an.a:sitµ~tur~1.&,ysi~~~.lij~p~~tl6tf-~:r(~t~-~-},f~~~~~-~~~:·::._·-_-:.' ~--· . . --·.A-~.e-ar,vt~i~~-·~cµicy.)rafbeen·--.a~ii1~n.(st~;~~:~4-.. pas~e,f: .. ·--_ :;, : ·· ·. -··_.:_ -0 Q:' a: z . . .--:_ . -. . . . -.~ : :··_:· -. . . -· .. :-..· ._ ... ·_. -. · .... :-: : . -.. ·;:_ •. . . :: . : . . . : .. O;'. l1J ~ z ([ Ill °' ----· JJ1tfaSOn1J-·· • ·_.·-· : • • •• .-• ·_ :.· •• = •• • .:·:. • -:. • : ··: ·-.= !L . -- I: ([ -(£./.: IV ['- (T) 0) CERTlFICATE' N_tj"4BF:R-.. -. ' , ., , /4" ·,--.·. .... . . I_. '• -? .. -. -· . . . ..., . :· ""ctttti7~rtahrDA1'tr' ,~ -"·· -. .-·,_ ·-.= . .-• ;_ =,· ~ i. ·· .. ····":--'\;jr··2t"·ti;-"/>;: /< 0 '<'f ·-·h' .. •·· ···. ~-iu'itS:t.i-ON'"I)~,jt\'··:: .. .._-_....:, .:·::-' ._.-:.,.:r~~: .. ~ i . . .. . . >' ;< -; __ ., ~ : '}.,,,.~ ··"'' E ' -:···. ..,;. .. ·~ -. :.__ --==----~--. ..: ... -·: ... -~ .... :.· ·-.-·.-· ·,.--. .., ('I') 'l . 11.. IV II) (T) .. .... .... C\l 0 0 C\l L IV :r:: ,,.,::,v. _:•,ittllj(-;ral Sy~tems Inspection . A"'1ards tb;~CermfCat~,,tb . Franklin t ~:~f . 1 ;,;; . . . <.:iI· ·. • >~fat .. ;:-~;7·Jc·· '·"'·· .•. ·. l·,1;(!t'½;'.:r,:>,;;:::. . .·:-• .·,)'.,::,;.?· In recognition of ·bavi!fg/s~~ef~f~Uy·:..48leted a: general, specific, .. : r::.} ,;_,: ;;i'.,;;i.~'.~pd practical examination. B,as'ed On the fe4uirements of SNT ~ TCG~;,:c{,i;{' {;;,. ·~tf!M~fl~~/1.) 1.1,, and Structuftl §Jstems Insp~tion written 'fffOcedu~.t:; · ·. · ····. i"'i .;,A near \'qjon acuity h~~,been administered andjl~t . . . ', .: ,;,\ · ;:) . Magnetic P~rlicle Le"'il 1 1·t,· <:~:.:. : /; . ~ ~~~~-. QL ... CmtTIFICATS NUM8mt. ;\::.\~---. ~ ,: !-,}t~);;})L .,.. :-: . . ... ,'\ . ~. . :·· ·-i .:f.:· ;· \;; ::: ... ·. • •• t • ·;:~': . .. ·~ ,"' ~~.: ,•, . -~¥z2 .. CB ICA: DAff _::~··,•:' .'· --~~~ri~~- . ,.•1. ' .... ;: ; ,~,,41!"~ IV st (T) .. .... .... ru 0 0 (\J L "1 ::r: '· (\J :, . ~ I . . .. ·;.. -:i:: A>·. . .. . . . . ;,.~ .. , ,_:,;~,--. ,:_ .--;_:., _.. . : .. :: . . . _.=·: -: . :\:;;j .: .-... . . . •· Structural SYstems:Ins-pecfiOii ' Awardsl1tfS Cettlficate,Jq : •. I •"• '>., • ' ... Eranklin Tsai .: ·:: :· : __ ··. ':,: .... ·.,,-.: '. .... : .,., .. : •. •• •• I '.·,;'.i:;,}ki~\// ,. ·;;·: In re~ognition of having s~ccessfully completed a: · gener:~I-~'.~p-~~\µc~--· · . .. . and practical exa_4P.~~~ion. Based ~~-the:requµ:;,~ents of'SNTl,c'.~f~~\i,)-'. ANSI/A WS Dt.1,··anif Structural System~ Imp_t,;edon written ptoeedu~~~~ . _. A n~ar visi,~ -~cuity has ·been admini.stered and''passed. ·. · _::;,-:·· .. . . . :-• .::-: ?~}~\ . . .. :: :L~' {Ue' ii\:rcATB NUMBER ::·, 3';~·' ~~~ -ciim=ic ONOATE ~;:-2aa -~/-',;~6 -.;, ROOERTlf!CA110N .DATE ...... :.::·· -.: . . Ultraso~i.cs Level II ·;\i~.-- ,t _.;it:/,.'; ,1· /-:: ... 't;' FROM FAX 714 632 2974 MTGL-ANAHEnI OFFICE l°llOOl/001 GHOSTRZD~ INC , \ 11·, l< fl \ , (. 1 I..., 1 HI, I )', I'\;-. l I I l I I• ll\1.:, ;;,. :,, '\.-C~lJ:; litiJI Robert ~otswi,:er WI 1112:15<1 FAX ND. : ;,., .. ;;.:;hm~tr.:.too "now\~~\: 'llt\lJ ~oilil:1' t",, .-iu~-..i.i\~H~!:~ .iutpJ~1h~1 ltl(" Ae! \.P;rt:t't<.'~lHm fC'-iL::;~::,,q;:" .,,,d. u }u.,Nh' rct.1,.J~nu,L!L! i.: .. ~(! "i ~11,\'Kl',II· 1·1¥1,11 rl',:'111'>1, :1-~ H",H'!.>,' • 1;1<.~m-; i . .,_ ... ____ , ~-· tr••••--t I :._ • .----\ \. · ••. -·J : .......... -.. ".? b-~.:.-, ... _.aEWl, 1!.,.amwt:1 h.,; Uv,(' 1~.,~. •1.~-.:~:l'!i~~ !;ipit,;:<. •.JJ,:'·?01.14 'Cl Valid l'iml il~r,; A(;! H11l111:fillll bm: American Welding Society C,•r1i}ie.s Tira: WELDlNu rNSE'ECTUR Robert L Motsinger .. -·· ·-----·· -· --· ~ ' .... 11,u1.c~ •1:11 :,i,J lhlWft#IC111nh~ Vt' !kctt4u 'ti.' ~:-,?~~;. w~ St.tt"..! .. rt,I t,c.,• 1J\l.»iiJiC41INf• ..>1,J t \?r'-df. . .JlhJ'll UI WtllJ'~ U'""~~~Wf•, v,t;f ,.,,, ... ,,.: 1( ...... ~ ... ....... ,?,. Ulr:ificoteNo,_. psuuct11ral M<l~Q'ftl) ;(Relnfoteed Co!'n:11'te -Stru«ural Steel an~ Wefdlnw Cl f>i'~ Con<kie OSprAy•ippfied Fireproofing a ________ _ Cl Pill! Prlv1og O Oii~ IM,ll\lll,lG ~ 01'>100 l)l<W,6,t')J )hlJ ltlf«mml<>n#<M1J~lli'1/lrmarmtfl.irrm!J ~....- Sey.,. es 2001 01 : 58PM P3 lntel'tmtlem.n! e:onferenca o!' BUilctlng Offlemls JeOSl.il<;T l MOT11'¥1;ii;R CERTIFl!cO R!r;INFORCED CONC:l{l:iE SPECIAL INSPEC'l'OR , "';a:r 11:11,1, .. ::,1•:• : ..•• ~1·,,.,,,1, , .... .-. •••• ~µp:,c_i.j;_v~.-,,:.,c-,' s::•:,,•• '-0•V • ..: ~,., 11'1.,' ,•I:,, Inwmatlon<ll C~nference of Building Officials R08£.'{f l. MOTSlHGE~ CS~"nFl~P SPi:ClAL 1N$1>ECTOR SiRUCTIJAAl. STEEL ANO WEJ..OING 1997 UNIFORM 8011.CING CODE e rnv indivic:IUul namecJ n@r~n ;~ ce/fr!Aeo o'l me category snown. n.ivlMQ rieen ~ certified pursuant i:o sui:t:~1,11 comp11rnpn of cm, i;,rescrmui:i 1A1r1c~vn el;llml~~_.,,,.............-·-EXi,iratiQn d<1i:I.'!· .J\.1111.'!'fl/,,~ NO. socHas-as . NtlC Villi~ unless 51gi\iii6vw-dlfi~QR1'P,t, :( ~{J t:C,~llicacion .C:l.eHS It;. ;(':t,1p<-\t:n\ lli(li,,-.·,r;qg, llf • Vq.-, ,.,re: .. ~d~:.,.•iJJO::,. • ... i;:,llcaolc cxper/t1r.r~ $.~Oi..•ie ~ veuJlt:C ~~ ."' ,,,. ... · ·•4.r·:,,,:: . . -~----·' /'U.NNING ANO OEVEtDPMeNT ~€VIEW INS'P£CnON SVl'IIW OIVISION Tel.($$8) 4512-5070 F&i; 1w;m qi:,;r-~s $PECIAL INS:PEcroR ID c:'.ARD "->e; -8..0.~-:~G.;'.2 c.,,iJIIQ~N~ SlgJ'lilllJre:~~, -,m,s,an:i:i...:.mbar ~1.~---• $U-E:i!D¥-TTI€lfl(lflofo,o;,,_~..,-ll,,ot"-4~ ~-------. i) i' ; -1 .International 'Conference of Building.·Officials . PERRY:-Q PEijEZ CERTIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL ,INSPECTOR The individual named hereon is CERTIFIE · having been so:~l'!!l!ll!•l!Wantto suceessfu) co prescribed written on anct qu Expiration date: De 2 03 No. 1130732·49 CERTIFICATE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR Register No. 1747 Expires 7-1-02 Issuance Fee 20.00 The b_earer of this Certificate is authorized to act in the City of Irvine as a Special Inspector of Perry Q. Perez 5741 Ludlow Inspection Administrator Garden Grove, CA 92845 Signature: J.._ _________________ ___,,_., :,,; \ '.' _-_ -(;9qncy of'Or,ange· _ Planning and·-Devel<,pmentSe:rvic~s • -Building inipectioQ:Services · tl f"l. REGlSTERE'.D $PECTAL INSPECTOR_ 1t P~R.J;:Z; PERRY ·I:~· the .i1,1dividuirl·name_d above is· authorized to.,perform ·the :n · . speciaLin$.p_ections,1ist~d on:the reverse of tljis,9arcl, -in-the I a •.· ;;::::1~~2::,:::::::· r~~_G~~"~--~~-~~-~. ··--...::_-_ No, lllB . ~------~ ------····---r CERTIFICATE OF REGISTERED INl?PECTOR Register No. Expires Issuance Fee 1595 7-1-02 $20.00 ' The bearer of this Certificate is authorized to act in the Cit~.~ t'· o(lrvine as a Special Inspector of . : ·· I Inspection Administrator Michael Phillips 7371 Coho Drive #102 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i CONCRETE International Conference of Building Officials MICHAEL W PHILLIPS CERTIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL INSPECTOR The. individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, having been so certified pursu;mtto successful completion ofttie prescribed written examination and ACI requirem nts; Expiration date: Au us 21"' 20 3 , / 'J · NO. 5022949·49 Pl/, . o valid uni s signed bV oertific Certification attests to competent knowledge of codes and stand3rds. Applicable experience should be verified by local jurisdictions. ----~- ir--~------------.,...---~----~ County ofOrfiiige . Planning and Development Services Building Inspection Services REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR PHILLIPS, MICHAEL . No. Ii48 The individual named above is author.i?:jd to-perform the speGi~ uispec.tions listed Oh'thl:l reve:r~ ofthis:card, in the. unincorporated ateasofthe County of Orang$. 1 · Valid from July 1, 2001 _to JuneJ0; 2002 _ . _ _ _ ~---.-::.·::---·--:: ..... · --.. ·"'~. ·-=-: .. · .. -.-.. -.·_ .. _'. · __ . __ :' ---: --'>·"·4 .:] ! • l e-·~ ,,ft'"u'" --------............................ ....,.,. ................ __ ....... _.....a,.,...._,,,_----j Buildin~-Cifflciali Cou,hty-of Onlhg~__ i ~ ·---.~--'• _,___:-,;__~ ..... -·--~~"--------~ ( ( International conference of Building·officials I FARHAD TALEGHANI CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR j :• l f l.· ·. STRUCTURAL STEEL & WELDING 1997 UNIFORI\II BUILDING CODE , The.individual na.med hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, l having been-so certified pursuant to successful completion of the . · 1. pres<;:ribed written examination. Expir-ation date: September 24~ 2003 NO. 0872154·85 . . I ' I ·-'°'S\ ··;; lntern~tional i conference of Building Officials ~ . FARHAD TALEGHANI J CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR J:c REINFORCED CONCRETE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, " having been'so certified pursuant to successful completion of the Ii pres.cribed written examination. .. ~ Expiration date: July_16, 2003 ,-,r,;~: . lj No. 0872154·88. . / c., · · l . . Not valid un1ess sJQnebycertificaolder.-;I 1c;Bo certification ?ttests to competent knowledge of codes and standards. f, Applicable experie~ce should be verified by local jurisdictions. . f ----._· __ -.., ---------~ --.. -----·----~Jl ) 02/27/2002 WED 17:04 FAX le]0<Jl/001. ! ·1 l I l .. ~ ... ·--· .. ·- Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 DSA / OSHPD REPORT TYPE OF WORK ~NSPECTOR OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPEC~(N) s . A-/:._ !11, APPROVED PLANS@(N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) ARCHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING I PROJECT. NO s--tt-e:n__ "}o 2..:z_ i1_o I ENGINEER 01) he__[ REPORT NO. PG l OF/ CONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. IPERMITNO.c.~-t,f 090 SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NA~ Mell/LL b ~l-e (I .fl(O , Ch-' INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT V l 5""2-S"' ~/J-..-f w Q.,n ~ 2'~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF nrn WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTR:;, AND RFIS. ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, rs CORRECTED. so NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPO~ /r. IA, /\ -· /; I -f:L?o ~,,PJ~ CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT I MANPOWER USED· .S IJ ILJL1/£vr I . AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVE¼,; rf n u-lJ l _;;/-r J IJ }..__p__u' , I hP -/_ f2o-o /-~ C"d07,/~, [:#/ Aul A~ 1 A,,h_ -~ ,;_ -r/4a-._< fl ~~ tl,,f} 12/o--r.Jv( -s:2, 7 STRUCTURAL NOTES. DETAIL, OR RFIS USED: REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: V ;/"' b /2_ s~~ ~ h~ &£ !._{) s-/.J~ ~ ~d}~, -d;A.~~ a_~LeHL /~sit~ 6k.2. _s., 4,1/~~41 c. 7 BEWQBK 8S l:EBQENI QE 8LL WQBK IQQ8~{ l:EBGENI l:BQJEQI QQMl:LEIIQN: WEATHER. (!_,~ SAMPLES TAKEN: ~ TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: y~ SITE TIME START: / t) f ,Qd SITE TIME FINISH: __,_/_2,~_;f!)o=I ____ _ TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ This is to certify that th ve reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specificatior,fe a the rules and regulations of the ervices (Title 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. S-, C 1 ..-02 Signature l?i~t NtJP ~ J1v~ ,:('/'k, -Date of Report ICBO Certification Number SA./~~ 7 2.Q City/ County Certification Number Rev: 7197 April 25, 2002 Emerald Corporate Centre, LLC 2117 Industrial Court, Suite C Vista, California 92083 Attn: Jeffry Brusseau Corporate: Branch: Branch: RE: Fire Proofing Density Test #3067 Dear Mr. Brusseau: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A, Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 www.mtglinc.com 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G, San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 441 W. State Street, El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 Project No. 3022A01 Log No: 02-0607 Permit No. CB-01090 01014 tJ The following structural members were coated with Monokote fire resistant material, ICBO# 46Q7 for fire protection. Samples were taken for density testing and returned to our laboratory and tests were performed in accordance with UBC test method 7-6. Please refer to the following table for the test results. LOCATION MEMBER DENSITY c Column, W14 x 90, 2nd floor 17.5 Beam, W24 x 76, 2nd floor 18.6 Column, WI 4 x 211, 2nd floor 18.7 Beam, W27 x 114, 2nd floor 19.2 Column, W14 x 211, 2nd floor 18.3 Beam, W24 x 68, 2nd floor 15.l The results of the laboratory testing meet the project specifications of 15lbs pcf minimum .. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact this office. Respectfully yours, MTGL,INC. Greg Everson Operations Manager Cc: Scott Merry, Scott Co. Ron Gross, Nadel Architects inc. Harry Carter, Keeton Constructio City of Catlsbad, Building Inspection Department April 25, 2002 Emerald Corporate Centre, LLC 2117 Industrial Court, Suite C Vista, California 92083 Attn: Jeffry Brusseau RE: Fire Proofing Density Test #3060 Dear Mr. Brusseau: Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A, Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 www.mtglinc.com Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G, San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Branch:· 441 W. State Street, El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 Project No. 3022A01 Log No: 02-0606 Permit No. CB-01090 The following structural members were coated with Blaze Shield II fire resistant material, ICBO# 1244 for fire protection. Samples were taken for density testing and returned to our laboratory and tests were performed in accordance with UBC test method 7-6. Please refer to the following table for the test results. LOCATION MEMBER DENSITY C Column, Wl 4 x 90, 1st floor GridF 16 24.8 Beam, W24 x 76, 1st floor GridF 16 18.0 Column, Wl 4 x 90, 1st floor GridF 13 19.8 Beam, W24 x 76, 1st floor GridF 13 17.5 Column, Wl 4 x 21, 1st floor 3 15.5 Beam, W24 x 68, 1st floor 3 18.1 The results of the laboratory testing meet the project specifications of l 5lbs pcf minimum .. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact this office. Respectfully yours, 2~ Greg Everson Operations Manager Cc: Scott Merry, Scott Co. Ron Gross, Nadel Architects inc. Harry Carter, Keeton Constructio City of Carlsbad, Building Inspection Department /I Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10178 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 56 4/23/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING@ B @ 3.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 281090 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Ceme11t Type: MixTime: 76 Slump: 5.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATJONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59,000 82,000 80,500 95,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 70 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2,074 2,881 2,828 3,338 Date Received: 2/27 /02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 OF OF ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,855 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. /I I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTlON DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10177 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 0,0,, O Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 56 4/23/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ B @ 6 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280994 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 57 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATlONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTlON DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 62,000 85.000 83,000 89,500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 66 Ambient Temp: 70 Admixture: (psi) 2J80 2,986 2,916 3,144 Date Received: 2/27 /02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,951 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. I\ I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10175 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0 I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 56 4/23/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ E @ 17 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280920 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Mix Time: 55 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59.500 83.000 85.000 103.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2.092 2.916 2.986 3.636 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 °ೱF ASTM C1064 OF Respectfully Submitted, 2,951 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. I\ A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10174 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022AOI Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 56 4/23/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING@ G.5@ 15 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280826 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Mix Time: 62 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57,500 82,500 76,500 '93,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 67 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 2.898 2,688 3.267 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 °ೱF ASTM Cl 064 "F Respectfully Submitted, 2,793 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. A A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10173 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022AOI Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 56 4/23/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ F @ 13 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280797 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 52 Slump: 7.00 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57.500 77,500 82,500 89,500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 61 Ambient Temp: 65 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 2,723 2,898 3.144 Date Received: 2/27 /02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,811 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. A Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: O- 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.297 4 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT -. • .. 0 TECHNICAN' AVAILABLE: r: -SOIL REPORT (V) (N) •'\ ,-Ai;i'I,q~EQ(elAN~(Nj SPECS (V) (N) APPROVEO SHOP DRAWING (V) (N) : :ARCHITECJ /I I {77"" NJ4 d'..,... LJ4r ,-:;: 1 -i=aR wEEK ENDING LJ I ::Joi o.2-!PROJECT. NO. ,A .::t 6 ;J ;l. rt C)} ENGINE_sB. . · c. 14.S/4 .E.ri c;,;f REPORT NO. PG I OF ( PLAN FILE NO. !PERMIT NO. c_R OICJJ 90 SUB·C0NTRAC~ / l · 14, e.s CtYV PROJECT NAME _ ;11 i:: /1,4 z. .R l'-l j_.,r J INSPECTION ADDRESS / . l~-~ ;::-A£.4dl4V C.14K·fsY11d. ADDRESS OF PROJECT ..f;;}4N [: I REPORTING RE.,Q{JIREMENTS: ~CBQ FIJ;LD ~SP~CT.I0*·!-1ANC!AL¥'fGL ~Q!L, -~~L :{ :-. , . ;~ " _ REVlf\,W PR,!lVIGl\JS REPQRTS ~ND us1s IFTHERE1:S NON-CONFORMING WORK°A"t THE ENifCWTIIB WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND·RFIS, ETC.,iFILL Ou:r AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A; COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: _ AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES ossEavEo: /l _,{) / t 1J 11 · / 11 : T1-1 :S..;/J,..t>/ -jl.4!.d/ T /1. -e vi ous V I.A.) e.Jcr-e.a/1 I,,. J Q,¥)q P C' Y/tJ I . . i!J ~ I IF 1· i . _/ -....I .._,;· jJ <:i /I -A --e.tl, PA Cf ,e.. .-, --:-,-. OI O jC/ "1/J @,J ,---{ld': . .KJNCL izt,,t.c, I STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USEu: y REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: , . .. ,-,:: ., ' . -/. I REWORK AS PERCENT OF All WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION:' SAMPLES TAKEN: lQ, · TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: {)'~ SITE TIME START:_0=·=-· ..,,.&=-5(,_S-=---·- LUNCH PERIOD: _______ _ -A) v/\o SITE TIME FINISH:~ QiL TRAVEl:TIME: · ________ _ I . (} I. 'j' 1 A 11 d.6_ £' VERIFIED sv-l fi,/~~'f /'"-PJY/(J11/'t'f';,. I, /' ··. I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE P_ERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIE~ WITH THE S1'1L INVESTIGATION _RECOMMENDATIONS • . AND /_OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS_ AND APPLICAB_LE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT 'I I /o/ I CJ;:}._ S0.3Sdo ::-g-~--£" Date of Report ICBO Certification Number Print Name · City I County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10171 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6 X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 56 4/22/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @ B.5 @ 2 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280571 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Mix Time: 62 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 49.000 71.000 74.500 85.000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: (psi) 1.723 2.497 2.620 2.986 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 °ೱF ASTM Cl064 oy Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. A A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10170 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6 X 12 28 3/25/02 6 X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 56 4/22/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING@ B.5 @ 3 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280562 Water added at Site: 30.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 51 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) (psi) 43,000 1.512 72,500 2,550 73,000 2,567 84,475 2,968 on 2/25/02 Date Received: 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 °ຕF ASTM C1064 OF 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. ~-- .. ·~·; ... . Corporate: · 2992 E. L.a Palma-Ave., Suite A Aoaheim, CA92806· . Tel:. 7.14.632.2999 F~: 714.632.297 4 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Di.ego, CA 92121. · Tel: 858.537.3999 i=ax: 85.8.537.3990 ., . . . . : ..... - . PERMIT NO.' . C../30t0/C/O -~--.. · . ·REPORTING-REQUIREMENTS: JCBOFIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGi.. SOIL, MANUAL ·, · . REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS J.F '.l'IW~is,Iic.i,~t<;~~~q. W.QM ~T~.,ot'.J1,I!;l.~ORK 6AY=~¥1S,~Jl~9 !ljTRi, A.NP R?.IS, :eTqFJLLpQ'I'. ANP A'f.I'A<:;.~NpEJ.<1C~!':lC.:-Y ~~Ql~.T, _. . · WHENA·:bEFICi;EJ:liCY,<:"i'M~"9R:A:·PREVl:0BS}NsPECTOlt'S; rs· CORR'.EC'.$IJ, SO/NO'fEtON'THE ORiqlNAL D)mCIE~Y REP0RT ANJ)·l~· · . f". '' · 4. ,_, '·.. • --· _SUBMIT/\ COPY ".'l'fHYOUR WEEK'S R:ePbRTS. . . -. . . . . . . MATER!A(S USED ev.CONTRACT~R (INCLUDE RES.EARCH REPORT NO:DR MATERIAL TE.ST REPORTS): . "!--. ;;_.. ... \ . ..:.R--'--'-----'--.........a---=--,.,.------..:..._--,--------'-'-----_;.--......_,,------------'----'----------11 ...,, . ~-. '•, CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: • ~-.. ·:. : _ " 1---'------'--..,....,......:...--'--,--'-~----'----..,..,..----'---,--------------,---'---'-----,----,-u R~MARKS, INCLUDING. MEETINGS: .. .. ~: -~ . --~. •. ··• .. ', •' ... .... _,. .. , .-,,. -~-, ' •• •:..,. • • ·~ ~ .-;:~-• • .•.. ..····.··.·.·,·.\ .·,.,.·,r•.• •, •• ·.·.·.!.~.~. • :.",:.~,· ... : ~.· •. ,· :~, ·~·,.: •.. · • • • .t;~ P •-~~~-~ ~.~.--r ~,-,:1 .. ·.·.-.·~.:.·.,.· .. • _ ... •• -·O·,t·,·.·.~~~-, .. , ·., ,• •. ';:':?, ':-._ • • ,.,._,:.-~ ~,~.-.~,:.'::.'.~.i~~.·'. ••• '!,. •• ,.:;, )', •• •",; ~; ·.~ ~-d•'.~.~~~~,~~ .. :.i.=!,:.~,:~.~·:.-~~~_,i,~~· -;_ .;.lf f._l,; "• :;: ~ . ._ ,,:.._:~ ~· -... • • !• " .,_ -· --. T ,•·-.... -••~ -: f,_~• • ~--,,. ~ ·11-"'.;.;'.·..:.··;_...-'-'_,,'"-''-'-,.--'-'--'",-"~""' ... ""---"""""""----'""'; ... ·."",-,"--i-~.--,..,':,-.... ,.,-_ ---;,,,-t:.,.· .....,.i--,..-:,,..,,1~;-,Jr-:.~.~ . ...,_-----.·....,·~-·.,..· .•.. --·~.·.,-.·..,.~.i._.:.·:·.-.-:.-: . ..,.,·,~..,.& .. ...,>."".·.:_.:----.·· .. _~ ... =;_-+-...,.,,.-,-;-~-~--,-.-,:-_-........,=-11 • • :: ~--'J • • Ii,. f ·. i-'f ,;,·. ; ··: .;:; .. ·~· __ ... ",'..... _ _..... ,_ ... -.. : , < ·,·. U=---'---'----.....:.,.--,-;-----------'--c---:-'---=-:--:--------'--=-.:.--,7,-;~;-;;iF,";;:-;--,--~-.:,._-----:---:--JI ,< - . :. WEATHER: C)1 ~ :·-. SAMPLESTAKEN: · .. ··:-··. :·. ·.··. . ·.-. :;:/i:\ TEMPERATUflE:. ~--_: ,. '·,::·: . . .•. . TESTSRECUIRED: ~~--:• ::.--.::• • ·~~. ,, ... ·· ·.·t_ • '• • r -•• -~· ._• ,,,• ,' '•. -~ "• '...:-> •• • • -• • --• ,• > • • ~\? t~?i;~}?tV}] ,'_:; ._. . . t~i~~t'\ · . . . . . . ,..,;,,,.;,[;::,~c}=-:=q..:.::...::-,;£-.::::. ,.-.. ;' . :f oo·cERTIFY'THAT'.I HAVE·PERSONALl:Y. OBSERVED All OF THE'WOR!<:(ISTED·ABOVE-AND THAnttrs WORK.C ES wirH TH~ Oil INVESTIGATION. REC()MMENDATIONS, _;:-:-,· · : · ::AND FOR THE"AP.P.ROVE.o· Pl.ANSJ:iPEclF.ICATki~s .AND AP.PLIGABLE SECTJori OF fr-lfi BUll:DING CODE, UNLESS 0. ERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT· ;~~·: ·.· -·~.-w~·.' . . . , . .. . ~1-I .?-I{);_·'· .--6-0.3i°ObO~SS- . · .. Signature . . , · . . . Date of Report · ICBO Certification Number i-lAiJi! &te-1le Print Name .. City I County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10220 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 9212 l Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/22/02 6X 12 28 4/12/02 6X 12 28 4/12/02 6X 12 28H 4/12/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: ROBERT MOTSINGER Location: LIGHT STANDARD, SOUTH WALL Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3233000 Ticket No.: 288960 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: JI Slump: 4.25 in. ASTM Cl 43 Remarks: Mix Time: 40 min. Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.42 28.09 28.09 28.46 (lbs.) 68.000 115.000 114.500 on 3/15/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 74 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2.393 4,095 4,077 Date Received: 3/18/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 4,086 28-day test complies with specified strength. 03/28/2002 THU 11:24 FAX 444 MTGL-ANAHEIM Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ava., Suite A A11aheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 DSA / OSHPD REPORT lYPE Of WOfiK IS.!_NSPECTOR OTI:CHNICAN AVAII.AllLE; SOI~ R~PQRT (Y) (N) S'AfZ-t11 APPROVED PLANfro (N) ARCHITrCT FOR WEEK ENOIN~ 2__ "3-2 -0 , ENGINEER 1! r-n/) C) REPOAT NO, CONTlii\CTOI\ ' PLAN FIL£ NO. . PG @ 007 /013 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.462.0650 SPliCl(_f!Y{PJ} APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (VJ (N) IPfti~;_ 2-/4:J/ l Of / r~rl~tO/'z,V SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME G JuPIZ i!_~~ Lv Lt/? f rN' {;:(K INSPECTION ADO~ 4 ADDIIESS OF PROJECT JS-ZS M ff~A.-b .s~ IU~l'()~TING REQUIREMEN'l'fi: lCJ30 FIELD INSPECTION MANUN..IMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND! .TSTS IFTHERl:: IS NON•C:ONFORMING WORK ATTtIB nND QP THE WORK IJAY, OR Mfl,/;;JN(l MJ'RS,AND R.PIS. ETc..._ElLL OU'f ANO A1vf"ACH A DF.Fl(:ITINCY REPOIIT WI IHN A DEFICIENCY. YOURS tJR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOICS, IS CORR.GCTED, SO NOTE ON "!'HJ::: URlUlNAL DEFICmNCY RTIPORT AND SUBMil A C(ll'Y wrn l YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. IMTcftlAL5 USED BY COITTAACTOI! (INClUl.lE RESEARCH REPORT~ MATERIAL TcST RFPORTS)· /11.o.wa ki 2:1... (.C~ d '/Co? CiONTF1Acro11s eau1PMENT, MANPOWER useo; A /n ~ r AREA. GRIO I INFS. PIECES OBSERVED: e SeLmv~ ?/4,da @ ,1~ d { 3 ; 6F-<'aJh~ cfi.:rL 1)/-S";:,p 3£/&., /Je.eu-s: uD ta 2,4 Ms-, bu h 7 ,,C.fi't_~ ., 17" ,A..) S'2,.] STRUCTURAi NOTF.S. DETAIL, OR AFl5 USED: o/l )fo~/ , 11eMAAKS. IHCLUD/rta MEETINGS! (1 CJ'vt<A ~ _---.z_ . /../.,dS"/1,., ---c>? .£e_C..O..,v~ S .. 11.e-~ at t,,t_) C ow UMd r if ic. ,. -~ ,; . /_ L ~ J2.~,.-A I.. . " ~ /,,.J.L ~ ' , ' L~ 0PV" ~ oay REWORK ~CENT PE ALL WORK TODAY; eEBCENT eBQJE~I ~QMeLETIQN; SAMPLES TAKEN: y c_ 5 WtATHEfl: C TEMPERATURE~ TESTS AEQUIREO. 't f2-S SITE TIME START:___!/_«-~0-0 ____ _ SITETIME FINISfJ: • /L__"-_O_r::'J __ _ LUNCH PERIOD: TRAVEL TIME: _________ _ ported inspections were made In accordance with the approved plans and specifications and lhe rules and regulations of the _QJ~~~Gf..{;~~~!'lii.fu!]il~le: 24). I certify u11der penalty of parjur, that I know the contents ot these reports and that all ol the aoova statements are true. :I I ?_0 I 0-C_ Slgnatum Dale ol Rsport ICl!O Certi!ication Number te. r--(Ad.oktt-Je,,,t,=..:,,£!1_~---- PrintName ";:;I" City/ County Ce;iiilM Rev: 7/97 I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10179 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSANo.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ A.5 @ 2 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 281129 Water added at Site: 20.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 79 Slump: 6.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57,000 88,500 87.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2,004 3,109 3,074 Date Received: 2/27 /02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 3,092 28-day test complies with specified strength. I\ I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10178 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0 I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 PARADA YA VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP /DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @B @ 3.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 281090 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 76 Slump: 5.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Jnch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59,000 82.000 80.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 70 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2.074 2.881 2.828 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 OF OF ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,855 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. I\ /\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE ** CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10177 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ B @ 6 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280994 Water added at Site: I 0.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 57 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 62.000 85.000 83.000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 66 Ambient Temp: 70 Admixture: (psi) 2,180 2,986 2.916 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,951 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. /\ A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE ** CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10176 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 (?X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ C @ 5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280964 Water added at Site: 15.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 58 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 64.000 86.000 85.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 64 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2.250 3.021 3.004 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 °F ASTM C1064 "F Respectfully Submitted, 3,013 28-day test complies with specified strength. A I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10175 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-0 I 090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ E @ 17 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280920 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: MixTime: 55 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59,500 83,000 85,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2,092 2,916 2,986 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 °F ASTM Cl 064 OF Respectfully Submitted, 2,951 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. I\ " Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10174 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @G.5@ 15 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280826 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: 62 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57.500 82.500 76.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 67 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 2.898 2.688 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,793 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. " A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10173 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @F@ 13 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280797 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 52 Slump: 7.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57,500 77,500 82.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 61 Ambient Temp: 65 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 2,723 2,898 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 OF OF ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,811 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10171 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6 X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 56 4/22/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING@ B.5 @ 2 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280571 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: 62 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 49,000 71.000 74,500 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: (psi) 1.723 2.497 2,620 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10170 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0 1 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/DSANo.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 56 4/22/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @B.5@ 3 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280562 Water added at Site: 30.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 51 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 43,000 72,500 73,000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: (psi) 1.512 2.550 2.567 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SUB-CONTRACTOR Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 DSA / OSHPD REPORT OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLA~N) FOR WEEK ENDING .3-l --02- REPORT NO. PG PLAN FILE NO. ADDRESS OF PROJECT ~ Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) PROJECT. NO. 3e2..Z-}l.o J REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FlELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RF1S, ETC., FlLL OUT AND ATTACH A DEF1CIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEF1CIENCY, '(OURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEF1CIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: ~J L (> llRtk: AREA. GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: q L ~ . cc -1> STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL. OR RFIS USED: A l!i-1 REMARKS. INCLl/O/NG MEETINGS: WEATHER: TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: 'I~ o-/ec> SITE TIME START:-~Q-'--""'--"-------Q,17~ SITE TIME FINISH: _ _,-/-~-=~----- LUNCH PERIOD: ________ _ TRAVEL TIME: _________ _ This is to certify that the above rted inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and t e rules and regulations of the raJ.Sii:¥i'GeS:ffi1tle 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 2) / /-510?_ Signature Date of Report ICBO Certification Number Prin~a:evit, h~~v Ci~~~rti!!Z~be7 ze, Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 DSA / OSHPD REPORT lYPE OF WORK l:SOOISPECTOR OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS~N) s A-~11.1 APPROVED PLAN!(lj} (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (NJ ARCHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING '-I PROJECT. NO. ~-t --02_ . '"" z!l-/J-n/ ENGINEER ~ae/ REPORT NO. PG C OF ( CONTRACTOR I PLAN FILE NO. rE~T, 6£0 / C/_(? SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME 1z. h1e,,u.u_~ I G!J~ o &eP crR. INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT ;Q_s--J!~~P-1 .tlc J C,,V'} ~ s~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT b OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS)·~ /7../..A2-e -S /4 1/d, :Z. /i,{!__JJJa /? .. c/ c/ CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: /J. /; . rt7L...LA/I ' AR~~D"L1E~J_:~~~ Iv fl ~ ~ r' ~ /4 W'• ,....__ ,,., ;u,~ A , t77v r IC /5, CSL/-2...) ~ _,/_ ---~ ~3 ~ ~f:L13~1-2 ~.12__.l.~ )(. z; eal-~ 6/J,~-o~~ A~ .342 c)D <"'2, I STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL. OR RFIS USED: rf :Il '-I /)....e. ~ 7,J I #-fl_ REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGSA~ Y" /4vj£ e /JI, CJ,/ /erfl-5L dw,t ~, ~2 i ~ I Cct~" ~ £.S @-ao~ ~~ ~ ~ JLer/oµ, ( RFWORK A~ PFRr.ENT OF Al I WORK TODAY· PFRC:FNT PROJECT r.OMPLETION· WEATHER~ SAMPLES TAKEN: ~ TEMPERATURE:t'e:) TESTS REQUIRED: ~ SITE TIME START:_.......:.../ =2:.cr::..,;,,I ].___0 __ TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ tl}g~~Oill/:[..[fl!QOQ_rrted inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications the rules and regulations of the rvices (Title 2 ). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 3 , ;z_oz_ Signature R L fUt; k /W ~ £LL/ Print Name Date of Report ICBO Certification Number £'A:-/ )J u±w:@2 City / County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10171 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28H 3/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @ B.5 @ 2 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280571 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: 62 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 49,000 71.000 74,500 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: (psi) L723 / 2,497~ \ ---2.020:---\ : /1 '-~~ Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10170 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28H 3/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @ B.5 @ 3 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280562 Water added at Site: 30.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 51 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION min. CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 43.000 72.500 73,000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 72 Admixture: (psi) 1,512 /2.550 ~ I --i:567 __ __, \ ) \ / Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 2,558 28-day test does not comply with specified strength. /I A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSJVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE ** CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG JNSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10169 ASTM C39/123l Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6 X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6 X 12 28H 3/25/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @B @4 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280479 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Mix Time: 47 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 51,000 86,000 87.000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 66 Ambient Temp: 70 Admixture: (psi) 1,793 3,024 3.060 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 OF OF ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 3,042 28-day test complies with specified strength. I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10168 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP / DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: I\ Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28H 3/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @ C @ 5.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280417 Water added at Site: 20.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 79 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION min. CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 62,000 92,500 96,000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2.180 3,253 3,376 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 °F ASTM Cl 064 "F Respectfully Submitted, 3,315 28-day test complies with specified strength. I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10167 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28H 3/25/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING@ E.5 @ 13 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280369 Water added at Site: 40.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 79 Slump: 6.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION min. CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 69,000 88,500 98,000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 65 Ambient Temp: 69 Admixture: (psi) 2.426 3,112 3.446 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTM C138 °F ASTM Cl064 "F Respectfully Submitted, 3,279 28-day test complies with specified strength. I\ /\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10166 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE l 525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: /\ Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6 X 12 28H 3/25/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKING @F.5 @ 14.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280327 Water added at Site: 20.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 72 Slump: 6.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 64,000 87,000 92,500 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 60 Ambient Temp: 67 Admixture: (psi) 2,250 3,060 3,253 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 °F ASTM C1064 OF Respectfully Submitted, 3,156 28-day test complies with specified strength. A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTJON DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10165 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/4/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28 3/25/02 6X 12 28H 3/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 2ND FLOOR DECKJNG@ F@ 12.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280281 Water added at Site: 15.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: MixTime: 79 Slump: 5.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, lNC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.43 28.43 28.46 (lbs.) 62,000 86,500 91,000 on 2/25/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 60 Ambient Temp: 66 Admixture: (psi) 2,180 3,042 3,200 Date Received: 2/26/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, 3,121 28-day test complies with specified strength. A A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE ** CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10220 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/22/02 6X 12 28 4/12/02 6 X 12 28 4/12/02 6X 12 28H 4/12/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: ROBERT MOTSINGER Location: LIGHT STANDARD, SOUTH WALL Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3233000 Ticket No.: 288960 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: II Mix Time: 40 min. Slump: 4.25 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.42 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 68.000 on 3/15/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 74 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2,393 Date Received: 3/18/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10173 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12. 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKJNG @ F@ 13 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280797 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 52 min. Slump: 7.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 61 Ambient Temp: 65 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10174 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING@G.5@ 15 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280826 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: 62 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCIBTECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 67 Admixture: (psi) 2,021 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTM C138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, A i I I A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10175 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING@ E @ 17 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280920 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Mix Time: 55 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59.500 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2,092 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, A A . ' W . ; /: ' I>l,vii!\~ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10176 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP /DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ C @ 5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280964 Water added at Site: 15.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 58 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTJON CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 64,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 64 Ambient Temp: 68 Admixture: (psi) 2,250 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTM C138 OF OF ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, A A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10177 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ B @ 6 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 280994 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 57 Slump: 6.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 62,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 66 Ambient Temp: 70 Admixture: (psi) 2,180 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, " Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 2-10178 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 PARADA Y AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: " Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ B @ 3.5 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 281090 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: MixTime: 76 Slump: 5.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 59,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 70 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2,074 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE * * CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. 1635FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 2-10179 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 3/5/02 6X 12 28 3/26/02 6 X 12 28 3/26/02 6X 12 28H 3/26/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: 3RD FLOOR DECKING @ A.5 @ 2 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 3053500 Ticket No.: 281129 Water added at Site: 20.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: Mix Time: 79 Slump: 6.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD-BLDG INSPECTION DEPT. **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.44 28.46 28.46 28.46 (lbs.) 57,000 on 2/26/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 68 Ambient Temp: 71 Admixture: (psi) 2,004 Date Received: 2/27/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 °F ASTM C1064 OF Respectfully Submitted, ' .. ) Corpo(ata: 2992 E:. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel; 714.632-.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 1. (.)_'. '·: Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 856.537 .3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT Branch: 44 1 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.462.0650 lYPf Of WOAK' ~ INSPECTOR omHN1c:AN AVAltABI.E: SOit. flEPORT (Yl (N) Sf>eCS !YJ (N) W£L~11Jtr ffl'ROVED PUNS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING {Y) {10 ARCHITECT NA-l>E'-f'MWEEKEN!lll«, I PllW'3~ 'L. .,A-t, 1 0'2.-c; -:>--o-z. ENGINErn Ho f> e ,,~-1~ I NU'iJ!.J-,../ '1 . REPORT NO. J1 PG OF CONTRACTOR ,e T" CrnJ~J/2. ti cf tgdJ PLAN FILE' ND. 1PERi;r·~1" 10 ~l (Jr,/ SUB-CONTIIACTOR VV' C. I /WC l'liOJECTNAME E/11-e I< I.AD Lt'½/<:~ Con. Cev,-h-~ INSl'ECrtON ADDRESS AllllflESS DI' PROJECT >AME V J5~s FA /1.f»'-1 rJV/f. ~ (r/fc'-S.BtfD R:EPOHXNG REQUIREMENTS: lcno FIELD INSl'ECtlON MANUAL/MTOL so:rr., MA.NUAL REVJBW PREVIOUS REPORTS ANO LISTS .!F-rnERB IS NON-CONFO}'(MlNO WORK AT THE END OPTIIE WORK DAY. OR MISSING M.TRS, AND REs, ETC., ALL out AND ATI'ACH A DEFIClllNCY REPORT WHEN ,A DEFICIENCY, YOURs ORA PREVIOUS lNSPECTOR'S, IS CORREC'l"l,.b, so NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL OBFICIENCY REPORT Am> SUBMIT A COPY \VltH ~OUR WEEK'S RBl'OR.Ts, MATJ;Rl~LS USED BY CONIRACTOR (INCLUDE AtSE'.ARCH Rfl'DRT NO. OA W'TE!II.AL TEST Rl:PORTS/: A"?.£.,. ;457i.-fE7J ... T"l CONTRACTORS ECIIIPMENT I MANl'OWE'R ~ Cl v /;L.I Ff It C) yv'/[,l-l:),W. J ... Pt:1LilJ/j L$ wG.LPtlV~ E..J.'ftJff?~tvl f=C.11-w v/ J-LP I fV',-p,z.tJCI(,( , AREA GRID UIIES, PIECES 08SERVED; Fv{,.1. P£f'/ W&le).1 Fo L /Yl o.HI &_NI' FJ'J'r1L C(f1'Jll{.ci(•r,J, "3d<f) FltJux F)t.fJl"I IN~-t f J.I ~ F.~/_ N. 7 t,Jw -F-fL _$ , 1, di,. W • Pk_-i IF, r,,e~w _ J>,'t/5, 1:PJ. /f/,1,. ,,,,-/'~ F'44 N, T, g ~-.J -8-3~ '-"' ~ tt¼.t-.J ... A,6~:1;tl.-~&!f.~-A_:/;,S. T.d~ w -A-4s LMw ~ , T' /: . , l+le-€; T;t!,~rl -/+Ii I-, T. KL"" -A-I, .W~ -r 1t. E'..W SIBUGTUAAL NOTES, OETAl~. OR R~IS usm: I <: ")_ -...3 . \ Lt-A, l .... 7 /, ., }z,,h_, Tri f s . -1/c? , -2. --, . -., --, -- REMARKS, JNQ..UDIQ 1/1£E'IIIIUI: OB iS il&-Jtvs:,,.r::> Fvu. P'~.+I rl Tl,-lJ.i E_,11.. 7°})£_ C)!Artt-1L 4J 1V1' l:. er { r1t> f"7-l( tf!_IF!.£> F·W~J'!. ;. ~ A-& t:!. ~ ~ }IJ.l'.. .- ' REWQB~ 66 eEBCtHI OE ALL WQB!s: IQOAY; fEBQENI fBQJECI QQMELEIIQN; WEATttER: t; vr,vr7 . SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE: 6o-:.. r 'ftSiS AEOIJ!RED: SITE TIME START: __ 7..,__ ____ _ SITETIMEANISH: S t. (7 O LUNCH PERIOD: - I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVI; PERSONALl.Y OBSERVl:D ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO TilAT THIS WOFlK COMPLll:S WITH THE S INVESTIGATION Rl:COMMENOATIONS. AND I OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE: BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NDTEO IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT r~ tJ;i.. 1 ~ t I) 1-0~7~)5'-r~ Br Signature Daill Df R11port ICBO Certlflca1Io11 Number PrintNams City / County Cer1lflcatlon Number Corporate; ·._) 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 (_ . ) :· Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT l'rf'f Of WORK ~ INSPECTOII O TECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPOIIT {VJ {N) LJJNC..-rtl e,1); -r'otv ~h,O'I\Jlt::' 4'~ .\PPROVED PLANSft)!N) AACHllelIT NA Dff. t..- ~OR WEEK EPIDING l f1 ';J.. -0 ?--c> ENGINEf!l 1--J o -Pil t:!"~v'.::-1 rt€fZJ/!1rJ4 • REPORT NO. PG CONlMCTOR K , 61'{>1(lvch 1,-.J • PLAN FILE NO. &91!:401'1 SU!I-CONTilACTOR PR i:::'.'." / 15 5tor-l Co ,-1 t"i'lfi. f ~ PI\OJECT NAM~,,11 £ 12-LA-D INSPfCl'ION ADDI\ESS ADDRE$S OF Pi'IOJECT 5AJYI£ J51-c; /'7}-'ll..D/r!A-VG L/'rftl; MP' Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 977 .563. TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 ,,. SP~S/fil !Nl APPROVED SHOP DRAWINll M (N) Y"~T. NO. A-I e;Z.,l..-0 Of IPE~ IJJO'!O L-,IJ-K/£ ~.C-OV\~ I REl'OR1':tNC REQUIREMENTS: lCBO FIEl.D lNSPBCTION MANlJAL/M'l'G(. SOIL. MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS !UlPORTS AND USTS ll'Tl!BRE IS NON-CONFORMI»G WORK AT TI-m cND OP TIIE WORK DAY. 0~ MISSING MTRS, ANO RFIS, ETC., FILL Otl'r AND AITACH A DEFrClEl'fCY REPORT WffilN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR. A. PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTJ;!D, SO NOTE ON 1HE ORIGINAL DE!F!CrENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS useo DY COlf(RACTOR (INCLU06 RESEARCH RfPORT ~o. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): ('fa-r,.1 < h. v--.'fl k G 11,t,-,_;t-}-.(. u~ _A<t/'1"1 I {'oJ ,1 7 5~tJ ~ I {a:;) 2-& c:J r_,.., J CONTRACTORS EOUIPM~T / MAljl'OWER USED: 4 r ll r7t) ll'11 }a l,f ,< "' L.t>/f/1/1.M.-pv.,-,e_ -V/1--f.V_/V"\.,,, I AAE'A. GRID LINES, PIECES OIISEIWE{J: {'J fl O f }I/( If,/ k:._ ~ ")t, Pr.J /V'J( fJ l:..y L([.{;(.!.a:J.N 61:5.,;: pt,1rg t.,Lt1 - F-Lr/41 -e-7/4 -£/11-r --ll/1':f _ '-11.t -4lfp& .. 11i--~~/4 ~ -A/2 q_1--G/_'v -~ ~c.f:J -JS~ ,.. c~~:z.. == 6Lt::. -c./s\3 _c4 SilWC'ruRAI. NOTES, OSTAII.. OIi RflS USED: · l l / .S I , J -IJd._~-l .. B-3 II' -,- R~MARl(5, INCLUD/llQ •mNOI; f2 o suveo tvtitl Sl-l/l..1,I k ~ 1!_,-,tjl ,,,,,~ Ai--Ti+~ ftSo vi!, l.-dC£J-1"'t.O~ f}-L,L Oa-/16,, £~Ult'? !51Ht ltA-tr.s ( ~ J4\c.# A-¥-/l--A6.:, 1. A1g Al'-1" -A Ir-. A/7 -,4,6ij_JJ_ -'i,JLt_ ,, ) r-r BEWQB~ AS EfBQE~I OE ALL WOBK IQil~ eEBCENI fBQJECI CQMELETIQ~; WfATIIEFt TEMPfRATIJRE: SITE TIMESTART: __ "7-+----- LUNCH PEIOOO: ______ _ ~AMl'LEs TAKEl'i: TESTS REOUIREO: SITETIME FINISH!---~--- TRAV£L TIME;----~--- I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE S INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, ANO/ OR THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS_ AND APPLICABLE SECTION Of THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENcY REPORT ~--~.....___._-~· CJJ.-1 o I 1 0'2-60 7J.t 51..f-e,ru SignalUl\l Dale of RQPOtt ICBC Certification Number @-nf.-1-@ Print Name City/ County C!!rtiflcatlon Number Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fa:(; 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT TY!'EOfWORK ,;a iNSPECTllR [)TECHNICAN AVAILARLE: SOIL RfPORT (Y) !NJ 1/V,;t..,,o I rJ C.,, APPROVED PLA'lS~ A~CHITECT ,PhO&-l-fOfl Wl:EK ENDING 0"'2 --cn .. ..,-d 'l- ENGINEER /-f-oq>p. J!l'l4>J /V6-¥,~,N~. REPORT NO. 10 CONTRACTOR KG-flt' rJ).J Co Nfi~uc.._1-l o N PLAN FILE NO. SU!l·CONTAACi'OR \I\) C.., \ \ rJ '-. PROJECT ~ME /?jvl /$ ~ O PG INSPECTIOtl ADDRESS ADDRESf;l OF PIIOJfCT >A-di£-\ $ --i.... S P::::/4 ti Ofr '1 /1-V t!-,, C /1--Je Ls-1$4-0 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: STT.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 sPa:s (Y) (NI APPROVED &HOP DAAWIN~ I PROJECT. NO. /), 3 -''"1--2...-(J ' OF I PERGNr1 4 I{} '1 c) {.,/f 1"15,. (1fo.m &n~re- IJ REPORT.ING llii:QUIREMENTS: IC:BO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGL son.. MANUAL RBVIBW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND US'l'S IF 'IllER);; lS NON-CONFORMINO WOR,KKr THE .ENl) OF THB WORK DAY. OR MlSS)NG MTRS, AND ms. ETC., FILL OUT AND A'l1'ACH A DEFICIENCY RE.POI.a WHEN A. DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSP:ECTOR'S, IS CORREC't'Eb, SO NOIB ON THE OlUGlNAL DEFICIENCY Rll:)?OR.T AND SUBMIT A COPYWlffl'YOUR WEEK'S REPOltrS. MATERIAL$ USBl BV COIHRAOTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH A~PORT NO. OR 14,UElllAI. TESi REPORTS): d:3 6 -/157 2--£71,.,, ti CONrnACTOl\8 EOUll'MENT / MANPOWl;R 0, ft ~~ £,p -~O~ILJ f~"M--!}\;£, w £1--0 tfvy, ~t11(1~ RA~ W£L..,P1o.lc, P&t1lftO AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSER\11:tl: F1.1v'-flZ,r,J ;v ,:,t-ru. Foll /"IIQ ;t1, 4{.,IJ .rlfA~ f £o~N'4ft,~ ~0 ,~iPL.. c.4-A ff-'4. · '-1/fJC 8,>' 4-fl~ 7i6_.(,ri • AL-:5e> FvL(., p,rrJ r,~>!-8PIM TtJ ()~ C,,.11t1rt:fl.,NJ L·JPF. C::/4_3 j.l,,g F vL-<-P ,e,... f-'!YI! .111, M .r,...., rrl.tJ/r'\$ 3r-.J F&,tl rl'lA-y,,1\1,-/C,. A't J? (or,r1nf-\1Q-O"\ T(" &111 I, d, 13T..-Je-~ L~ --l6 l. '"' E $TflUCTUAAL NOTES, DETAIL. Ofl IIFIS USED: s ,A_ 12--A~., _ 4/.51 .. "3. _ w P5' J-. j. -.>2.., ~ -Lr J, "l.--. - REMARKS, INCLUDl/#D /lfEETllttll: 7Hs AT" Jrl-tl ~ ISSJill vs D WPL-011/l.r t+-8~ t/"£ (__(7(ff..,..(. .. ,... I BEWQBK AS eEBCENI OE ALL WQBK !ODAY.; EEBQENT EBQJEQI COMeLEIIOtll: WEAlllER: l-l.'2....,., r-SAMP\.ES TAl(EN: TEMPERATURE: 6~0 -r 'rESTS RECUlflEO: SITE TIME START: Sf'J'HIMEFINISH; ,5 : 30 LUNCH PE~l00: -~~c......-4_"-"-___ _ TRAVEL TIME:-------- I DO CERTIFY THAt I HAVE PERSONALLY ObSEFIVEO All OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE OIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PL.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ___ ,--;...;___.=~ tJ J.__ / ~ 1 / Ot-CJ~ 7 2--·) S '-r-2 .('"' Sianatul'll Date of Report ICBO C<l1lcalion Number l'til'lt Name City I County Certification Number Corporate; •.l 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suita A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 '· .. Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 \ I FIELD REPORT TYPEOfWORI( Ci\ ltlSl'EeTOR D T'ECHNICAN AVAILABtE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) u,f'ICfl-£.Tt. Nd'N-s t\t2H'-' ll. ~ ~ ) AFICHffEi,f Nlf-0 g., L.. ENGINEER ~p~ AEPOI\TNO. PG I ,JC., . CONTRACTOR /<.££JO~ CdrJsi~v(..,·f-i 11~ • PLAN Fft.E NC. SUB-CONTIW:T ~ f? C,_j $ \ON (dr-lqt,z:,f,r_ PROJECT NM.IE /:./YI /!S,K(;A C> -'ODA£$S Of PROJECT Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 F~ 760.482,0650 SPECS (V) (~) (l'i) ""' Of REPOJl.TING lmQUIREMENTSt rcso f'lELD INSPECTIO:t-f MANUAI./Mrot, son., MANUAL uvmw PREVIOUS REPORI'S AND USTS IF nIERl! IS NON-CONFORM'.lNG WORK KI THE fill!D OFTHEWOltK DAY, OR MISSING Mtlt$,AND RFIS, ETC., Fll..L OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY ll.Ei'ORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, XS CORRECTED. SO Norn ON THE ORIGINAL bm'ICIENCY Ra'ORT ./\ND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEl('S REPORTS. MUERIAI.S USED BY CO!ffl\ACTOFI {INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR P,IATl'l11A!. t£St REPO~): {'loN ~/t,1\r,lll. '( J(,o:u'r, He.. i, -/tP'frl HQ smucnJML NOT£S. DETAI~. OR IIFIG usm: ) ' WEA'nl~!l: v~ TEMPEIUTUIIE: 0 CJ q ~ SITETIME S'TART:--7-1------ LUNCH Pl;RIOO: _______ _ !, SAMPUS YA~EN: TI:STS REOUIAEO; SITE TIME FINISH: ______ _ TRAV~l 1'1ME; _______ _ I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF ntE WORK LISTI;O ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SO INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, ANO/ OR TTiE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE 8UILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT T~ Signature ----------- 1)/10'- Daill of Report ICBO Cortl1fcatiQ11 Number Ff} Je. Hll-...O Print Name City I County C&rti1icatlon Numbtt · .. 1 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858,537.3999 Fax: 858.537 .3990 FIELD REPORT 1YPEOFWORK QJNSPECTOll OTECHNICAN AVAIUB!.E: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) l;t/1$,L,,DI ;J4 .lPPR0\11:D PLANS (VJ {N) ARCHITECT tJ It O Ii-L It J'?l.14 r,iu,,.{" 1 tJ C.,-l'DR WEEK ENDING 't.,_ 0'1--l)'L,-C ENGINEER . . H-0 Pe-fi5N&,1f{a£/N 4 REPORT NO. C, PG CONtAAClOR k }2-5,:To N G:JNS~Vz:,11~ PUIN fllf NO. 6U9·CONTRACTOR w C \ [ f'I c,. l>~OJEC't NAME ff./Y/ I{,>(. £A O INSPECTION ACIDRl:'$9 ADDRESS OF PROJECT 5'Y'l"li-l,5)....$ FA-tZ Olr'1 11 v£ ~ CA-fl-tr /S/.)--Q Branch; 441 W. Sta.ta Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TESt Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482,0650 SPECS (Y) !NI Al'PROVED SHOP DAAWING (Y) (NJ l PR~. NO. A-j t,2-)...-d OF lPE~~ b 1 t} 1 l) /...-frK-II f x-n, ~n..\-t.e_ p REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: rc:ao rIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVlEW l'REVIOUS REPOR'l'S AN'D LISTS IFiHERE rs NON--CONFORMINO WOR:KATTHE END OF nm WORK DAY. OR MlSSINO MTRS, AND RFIS, EiC., Fll.I,. OUT AND ATTACH A :OEFICIENCY REl>ORI' WHEN A bEFICISNCY, YOURS OR A l?RE:VIOUS INSPBC'l'OR'S, lS CORRECTED, SO NOJ:E ON TIIE ORrGINAL bl,.F'ICIENCY RBPOR'l' AND SUl!Mr.r A COPY WITH YOUR WE:EK'S REPOIU'S. MAlllRIALS USl;O IIY CONTMCTOR (INCLUllE RESEARCH REPORT NO, OR MATEfllAL TEST REPOfl~ /!,.. ·-? -A5'7"l 1%71_ T'B CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ M,\llf/'OWER USBl: c;.-c1h.1/tl.-\F(&D W&J,,,OLht P<J121lr~LJ Wl!P--01 f\14-J;ip:_;) P111~ . ~ vv,-.c.,o 1 f'/Lr /?/loCK-81 ' , AREA, GRIO LINES, f>t~ 08$eRVEO: Ev'-t,; _sf'/ Wt:Lt,.s Fr:JYl fYlt;/W. £r/r F/(A./'11 ~ Ca"'" £,ct t 4 rJ ~P ptt,d)t:_ ~JCkM(f\A:. t...1NF.-Ft/Jt w, T,£t "'-/'r/1.f,,£, "t;IJ~t,,J. A-'4° 3;,J ~/.4)o,<. r#/'tll lol~ '-t1"f-14'.'.1 N_ TB_f.W P4:1..':t_5. T,t!,,w -f¾:J F, 18.f: J.J _ D ~.1. w, 7 &f w -P/2·4-~. 1,r3 ~ w. iFsJ(,,(. P~ PF/IQ// FttAIY1e MA/fl ra rtA/\Jt...1£ Nt<Jfd~Tc*'N,.,. t-11'1£ ,;, w, ni_ 8.Jl'N_,7;, ,-°Al ~l STllUCTUfW. NOlllS, DETAIL. OR RFIS usm-c:; > . 2~ 2 -2-•3 -4--_A.3.2--12-_A ~.) .. 2 0 A',.~ -1/c h < REMARKS, INCUIDIIIQ MEETl/11111: 0 8.S /LI(, ./ €0 wf.t.f.,,.D ul.4 &,T TI'\t d:QQ.v'G.-l.,qCJJ., '/\ ()' ,J . d;L~ ~ o8$Unu:> W/!t,p1rl4 (J,f-ft1L.-<.. {!fol' /!¼ T ~ L-,~ l(otJ.J F~ ,P! ,4!/f;"'\, ~. 1// tJ,;,.. &t §£.TWC&N I '2--J3 L..1 "'1e.. -141..1 ... Tri 'IZ$1l.. Fv4-Pl:z.r.J; lt~fZ F-" rt. j¥1q~~1--Cq,rt/1:CJlm 1, 8JEA-/Y1 T,J;/JJ.(.~ S.r.£ 'l,h 7. i -n-h~ f!tf,4-N-\-~, "~ltfl3 L.(..trl--• BEWQRK AS PEA! OF ALL WbBK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT GOMPLEJJON· WEATH£R: TfMPSRATIJIIE: SITE TIME START:--7-+---=--- lUNCH PERIOD: J () ~ SAMPLES TAKEN: 'TESTS REQUIRED: ~?.:';2 f7 SITETIME FINISH:--~2."-'>. """'2-"'--- TRAVEL TIME:--~----- u °$~~ ,-LN e I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK llSTEO ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORI< COMPLIES WITH THE SO INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. AND/ OR TH£ APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE Sl:CilON OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DERCIENCY REPORT ~ · o( ,;1, !)1-, t10?2-tsl.f>-6r Signature · Datu of R~port ICBO Certlflc:ition t1u111ber fit&IIJ p Tdttfi' 1-/Brv I l'rint N.ime Cily I County CMllleallon Number ,) Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 ( Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TE:S, Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIE.LD REPORT TYPE OFWORII OlNSPloCTOII 0 TECHNJCAN AVAJUSl.li: BOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS (Yl (N) Wti-£...OtN~ APPIIOVEO Pl.ANS (Y) (N) APPROVED SK!JP tJAAWI NG (YJ !Nl AIICHIT~ ,4 t) 6:,(__ /¼-~iTW-.s lrJC::..• roRWEEK~DtNG 7-,-01,.,-0 L-I PROJECT. NO, / '3 6'2.--l--A-O ENGINEER l-l 0 f~ E/'J(,;,1 f(fl,£1!:trl G R~RTNO. (8 PG OF CONTAA~_t!,~ 'fo;.J C:....0~~1/0tl~ PV.N FILI: NO. rRMITND. q C.E,010 D SUl!·CON'l'IIAC'rOW c.. \ \ "' c.,. PROJECT NAUI, :b'l~,a.,4-0 l,-/f/,(£ (IIN? o. c.ii.\l\+rR ,, INS~N AODFIESS trv.t: cA-/t.f.SIJl)-r;J ADORE!)$ OF PIIOJEC't SAIYl1l. U V 1 S~ FA-l20fr'1 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: lCBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAl.M:tax. SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS RE:POlrrS ANP LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFOrtM!NG WO~AT THE END OF nm woiur Dii.Y, OR MISSING MTRS, AND ms. me .. m.r.. OUT AND A'ITACH A DEFlcmNCY Rlo!roRT WHEN A DEFlCIENCY, 'lrOOR$ O& A PREVIOUS INSPECroR'S, ts CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE. OlUGlNAL :Om'ICIENCY REPOltl' AND SUl!MlT A COPY WmIYOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS U5ED BY CONTIIACTOR {INCLUDE RES!:ARClf MEPORT NO. OR M4TERW. lU'I' IIEPOFml): .· d:3'1., A-, 572-.. 1£,7 I -T'3 COlfi'flACTORS EO!JIPMi;NT I MAHPOWal USEI>; ~ c:.;>vftL.,l f1i:.o ~1..,0/£KJ tf?" 1t f/119.4 ~Z,,t? I J.J CJ Jai.v If~ l) "Fe/Jr W v,/1,-l,,,D I N t:.r ~()C/:JJ:· AREA. GRID LINES. PIECES O~VED: 'f:iL.J,.,J., ftEN Wl£.LI>~ · .r,tt ft'IO,f!lp/T FJt!W'1£ CcNHt1:~t1d ~ ;JD· .2.. . FWt:>J(. Flt/w'll1rJ t... l-1N'f! Al. _S.,TtstN_ A-•1,..( N. T&w _ A-·1/~, 7,.ilt r,,.J - A,1.,_t,J,. ,~t. W -A-L-5,o -;:rt°,-.~ FLM11114 .. , , ' l-1 l'I IL G,;,J ... ~-TM-W ... 4 1'f WT~~;_ 411,,..f.fi , ,_ .. STRUCTURAi. NOl'i:S, DETAIL, OR RFIS USE{,; ~ s ?--2 -').... ~ _: ···Lt-/4?. '2. .. ·l¼.1 J,/pfll-rZ 1 "' wfr. t r : Ra,IARICS. INCI.UDIIIO .rnllll/1: 8S 0 t!J!...V.£0 rV_ LA-1)$,-.i W /tt-,ru rotz.. TttrE. 'F/(~E (orlf(k..i ,r.J Jr,I T6·f_ {Jo Tra.M L ~ Ef, ' '. : . ' ' iRr:wnRK ti~ Pi:ML>-ruT ni:; ti1 1 wnRK mnAY· Pl=Rr.FNT PRn.u=r:T r,nkAt>I FTION· W~THER; Ll.iz_.V ' SA¥1'1.ES 11\KEN: TEMPEIU.TIJRE: bo CJ TES1S REQUIRED: 7 .. 5 "'''" .,,J~~-J!a. SITI: TIME STAAT: SITE TIME FINISH: ff ' ,-11, LUNCH PERIOD; ~a ~ '. TRAVEL TIME: A - I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONAU.Y OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISlEO ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH lH~ sdk INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, ANO I 01'1 l'HE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICAilONS ANO APPLICABLE SEC1ION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEO IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT 1~' . :.. of ,3tJ ,o--z_ og72.--1S't'-<8_,- Signature ICBO Certification Number ·~JJA--0 T IJ{_,f__Q HA o,; I Print Name City / County Cerllflcatlon Numb!r ~ "'···· "'"" · .. 1 Corporate: , , .2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A : Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714,632.2999 Fax: 714,632 . .2974 : . Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tai: 858.537,3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free; 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 ,: ,, FIJELD REPORT Fax: 760.482.0650 ., / 1Yf'I: OF WORK ~ INSPECTOR OlECHNICAN ; ! AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N} SPECS (V) (NJ Wlz t,...,r::, trJ4 ' APPROVED PLANS (Y) (N) APPROVED $HOP ORAWIN/i M (N) AACIJlrfCT N/40£ L FOR WEEK ENDING IPllWECT.NO. .. 02--c.n ... -e;, t. '>Cl ).,2 -A~ I l;NGIN~ j-.} op£. 15-tJt:.r l /1€t).11-L-, AEPOlliNO. 7 PG Of i: CONTRACTOR °K, £G_, JCJ-rJ Co-r,ut-t1 ,·(..,+-,~,-~ : PLAN FILS NO, rm~~ oJOfO f .. SUB-COl'tltlAC'JOR W'-\ J ti C.· .. PIIOJtcT NAME /: /Vf Ji /l. {A-O LAKE. ~P"!{O, &n.\--t .Q_,, t INSPECTION Al'lDRESs C/}Jt. lS JSAr ()r. AOOI\E88 OF PROJECT u 1<.2.-s-F4 f!Dl;-1 A--VJZ, S -4-m Ji:. lUl:l'ORTll'lG REQUIREMENTS, 1030 FIELD INSPECTION MAN~L son,, MANUAL R.&VIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND us-rs ll;TlmRE IS NON-CONFORMl'.NG WORK AT TI-IE ENl> OP THB WORK DAY, 0-R MISSING MrRS, AND R.FIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DBflCISNCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOUR.s OR A. PRBYlOUS lNSl?ECTOR'S, IS CO~, SO NOTE ONTB'.E ORlGINAL DEFICIENCY ~RT AND SUBJl4IT A COPYWITHYODR WEEK'S .Rfil'ORTS. \ \ MATI:RIALS U$ell IIY CONTIIACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO, OR MATEAIAL ~~f REPORTS!; I L:. CONTI'IACTDAS EQUI~'!' / MIINl'OWER USel): ~ : ! MIEA. GRIO LINES, PIECES 09SER\/EtJ; : ' . .. i; .. : ! . 511\UCTURAL NOTES, DE'J'AJL, OR RflS usro: .. '' REMARKS, llfCI.UIJlltfl IIUJJNQI; 5ttvw µe J(/1> ~~(9rJCU l£ .. ,e 0 tv It',.+, rJ Dv~ , - : : ' ;,,• ... } .. ! • BEWORK AS PERCENT OE ALL WORK TODAY· .. PEBQENT PROJECT COMPLETION· f: WEAll!ER: SAMPLfS TAKEN: ' TEMPERATIJIIE: i :· ~STS 11rou1REO: ' .. . . ' :,. .. 41..1--0 L'll ~ -,t// SITE TIME START: SITE TIME FINIS»· i '·• VE~IFIEO evJ ),/ .... ~;°f. L -.. LUNCH PERIOD: TRAVEL TIME: ./ /I, f /I I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LI ·~o ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE ~IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS ANO, OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE sec1wN OF THE BUILDING COPE', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ,h~ . !_· 0) 1 2t 1 (}?-_______ Dam of Report ICBO Certlfltatlon Number f>rint N.ime Cl!'/ I county Certlf!~llon Number n., .. ,.,..., Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WORK .0'1NSPECTOR OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) vv'fft,.p nJC::t APPROVED PLANS;rl°{N) ARCHITECT p fJ/t ~ l-Alld·./J f £.t..,i_s /tJC. FOR WEEK ENDING ' OJ-2 -01..... ENGINEER Hof:£ £-ti Cs, I ti i,,~Je1 f'J ~ · REPORT NO. 5 coNTRAcToR K iJ:..f;To N 6~.s,reva \ r1/.J PLAN FILE NO. PG Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING J~'(N) I PROJECT. NO. l 3 l5 ')...,~ -Ao OF IPERLB&/0110 SUB-CONTRACTOR vJC,\ jf\/G, PROJECT NAME F/VI f$.ll l/f D l-/He'l. INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 5AfY15 jc;)..:S FA-e Dlr-"7 It VI!;, ll]-12 L-~ rJ Ao REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): A-/!ff -.g 3-6 ,-A-'57'"' -7)-l CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED(Q_ :2-VAU. \";'.: l 1$0 IN fi,~O 6 JlJ -AI12 Tfrr5 ~ 1,1J/$"lo I NC, ~ Ul(i7YL(tv FC.A ii\) Pl2ol£sJ AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: F t • ;) t.,L. Pe-tv WE&D£ F-oK!. M oM 17p.rr FRAm12-('_ CJ ;J rJ J?l-fl C N ~)"D PU/t>ft. P:-,R/}('{IIN Cf . L tr..Je'. A/2 l:; T6~W-A/..,,W, T':6{.W -C./_,. N. T.(3tc w c;'.)S,Te&r.1 -..,, ....,, -C./4. I 2. £ r-f' -. L.-4 w /.. (3 ! w . .-· ' 2. . "T;/3 & h) STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL. OR RFIS USED: .s --:)..7, ¼2-. ,~/43,, J-lo1e r~3.1 "I" vJPS , , , REMARKS. INCLUDING MEETINGS: 0 i3S'rfl/2ve..C> P:k'.1,.J... f)jfrJ w',;;, /.., p s FtN'2 ·q-1£ Plfl'r/v1 ti-loJl.lt/ft.&ll 6 N( . (/ r.J n f' ~o"TT(.11"\ K., w£a.. BEWQB~ 8S EEBQEl'H QE 8LL WQB~ IQ08Y; EEBQENI EBQJECI QQMELEIIQN; WEATHER: c.,.,,lt,....1..r SAMPLES TAKEN: 60 a---i- TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START: __ 7_,_ ___ _ SITE TIME FINISH: ~o-·'_.P_,.._' ---- LUNCH PERIOD:-~------TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SO INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, ANO/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ANO APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ___ ll_~_;;~ · Ol 1?.,{; 1 -OL.-o~7:i.15t:r-Bs- signa,ure Date of Report ICBO Certttication Number City / County Certttication Number ,_ Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT OINSPECTOR OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE )01L REPORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLANS f{J(N) SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING ) (N) FOR WEEK ENDING I 6 --2,-o -l) "'"'2.- PROJECT. NO. /\ ) c>'2--2---.-1'1" C) REPORT NO. PG OF PLAN FILE NO. ol 10 SUB·CONTRACTO~ G } l f'--1 (_ PROJECT NAME ADDRESS OF PROJECT 0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): t;; ?J-T O As 6 ~ A--57 "2--?-o CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: Eui l .. REMARKS. INCLUDING MEETINGS: -z o {25~..rao W£L-D irl t, ~a~ THE!-rM/v'/·lL CotJiE,t.,\\V N REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: TEMPERATURE: SITE TIME START:--7-+------ LUNCH PERIOD: j O \/\L'./ SAMPLES TAKEN: TESTS REQUIRED: ~ ~.> 0 SITE TIME FINISH: ____.._,,_,__._2.~---- TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ___ ·-ra_· ~-~ . CJ) I 2~ 0 L.- Signature Date of Report ICBO Certification Number Print Name City/ County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.297 4 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WORK D INSPECTOR O TECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) ! /· i o uJ 'lr. APPROVED PLAN~ ARCHITECT N /\Di L-ARl,\-HTi;e-T.s /Nl. FOR WEEK ENDING ,,/ 8, _ 2.--'LT)-6 '- REPORT NO. 3 PLAN FILE NO. SUB-CONTRACTO~ ~ r / ,- V" '-tr.JG· PROJECT NAME ADDRESS OF PROJECT s AM'IZ- PG Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) PROJECT. NO. , 302,-1..-AG I OF PERMIT tj_Q. 1 C....015 Joi o REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPOA • 36 & we f::, A-ls o F{) P-"1"'/4-1£ N ci N-F~ft/fl $ 61!.A /t'IS To Cc l \JfV1 N w&-6 /l'l0/1'1£'.t-iT Co,vi\l • C:ft.DrJ; T T1-\€ A-$t)v£ lac,4TL0N WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE. TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START; __ ........._ ___ _ LUNCH PERIOD: 3 0 ~ SITE TIME FINISH: __ 5~---- TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ VERIFIED BY: J ' I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE S IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ___ "Ta~~· o1 ,~, o~ 0~]21s4-Kr-· Signature Date of Report ICBO Certification Number ,-1r~8A-D TA-L..,e.Cg\.:\A-1'1 J Print Name City / County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 [YPoUO wv= il\VAILABLE. H SOIL REPORl f-;j SPECIFICATION! NDT-Ultrasonic and Magnetic Particle Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING AKCHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING rRuJEc;r.NO. Nadel Architect Inc. 26-Jan-2002 3022-A0l oNG!NEER REPORT NO. PG OF Hope Engineer 1 3 ~ONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. rERMITNO. Keeton Construction CB 010190 SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME WCI Inc. Emerald Lake NSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS Of PROJECT 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAI.JMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITII YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. "' v.:,,c.DtiY ...... n .......... vr..(u,.,.,.i..vu.c.=.:,,E.ru,,,...,nREt'URT NU. UKMAfi:.""-'ru.. u ........ u:...--vRl::i); SEE ATTACHED NDT REPORTS wNTRACTOR> EQUIPMENT / MANPOWER uSED. SEE ~TTACHED NDT REPORTS AREA. GRID LINES. PIECES UBSERVED: SEE ATTACHED NDT REPORTS STRUCTul<>\L NOTES, DETAIL, OR Rf!S USED: SEE ATTACHED NOT REPORTS =M=S. INCLUDING MEEIINGS: SEE ATTACHED NDT REPORTS REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: NA PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: NA WEATHER· NA SAMPLESTAKEN. NA TEMPERATURE: NA TESTSREQUIRED: NA SITE TIME START 7:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 16:00 VERIFIEDBYJ~jl ,!,£ --hY LUNCH PERIOD NA TRAVEL TIME NA I ,.,, This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules aid regulations of the Department of General Servic~~ify under pena(t)' of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. ~~~ 24-Jan-2002 :r- Signature Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number ALEX HUTCHINS ASNT LEVEL II Print Name City I County Certification Number --~ I I NDT FIELD REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME EMERALD LAKE JOB NO. 302201 DATE 1/24/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad Ca SHOP FIELD_!_ EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Branson/ USN 50; Serial No. 600717 Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkamer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL -------------REPRESENTING MTG ENGINEER HOPE ENGINEERS E;~R.' ,;y:t.QGZP:,C#<:.tl ,%·.:.'.,:.:;. :(/\:~'.~,,;:,::§;,~;;_:,; .;~}QG$.CRfl?·T:lQJSf tj~~ ,.;; !/\'/i\,i.0.;~:. < :·~: AOJ~1 1R1;iJ; 5;.,s:,:...:~ :/.'.1lf.{Ei;M~~~§1;;,~:;,:, ,: ' ~;:" 2 Fl 7.4 S 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 Gl7 N 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 Gl5 E 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 F.14 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 E14 E 3 CJP welds T&B Flg & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 Ell S 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 G12 W 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 E.7 N&S 6 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 6 0 UTOK 2 D.4 S 3 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 3 0 UTOK 2 E13 W 2 CJP Welds T&B Flg UTOK. 1 Reject Web to Col. 2 1 UTOK 2 G13 E&W 6 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 6 0 UTOK 2 G14 E&W 6 CJP welds T&B Fig & web to col. 6 0 UTOK Ln G 15to16 16 PJP welds 2 welds per bm to bm connection. 16 0 UTOK Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 60 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 1 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ Of_J_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMP H THE APPROVED PLANS, TIMEIN TIME OUT REG.HOURS O.T. HOURS SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BU 7:00AM 4:00PM 8 1 ALEX HUTCHINS All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II Approved By SEE ATTACHED COVER SHEET SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. Project Superintendent NDT FIELD REPORT REPORT NO. PROJECT NAME EMERALD LAKE JOB NO. 302201 DATE 24-Jan-02 ------ LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad Ave, CA SHOP FIELD x EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Parker Contour Probe/ DA-200 Serial No. 11361 PARTICLE MFG Magnaflux ----~----- METHOD OF INSPECTION D DRY D WET D RESIDUAL 0 CONTINUOUS D AC D PULSED DC CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 ASTM E709, Section 12, 20, Table 3 ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 MATERIAL ------------- REPRESENTING MTG ENGINEER Hope Engineers :vJ;;l3:;d11,;o,~1e:.cw.:.: .:~~-i;~;~;.,;;r..{;r{::~;,~_~;,~,,-.;;~;,~~~~-:.;~~~;~J~$~I{1.Bn~~;;;~!.:~;,t;,;::.~:/:~~''.,~\;,:.;:~:,:.~:;:c:::~:-~~ l¥.:GC.; :rteJ· ,~·.::;;:::;;:~-;~:-'.;;,g:g~aK$~:~:;:~~:.:"'~_.:c,.:,~ 2 Fl 7.4 S 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK 2 G 17 N 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig of bm. 1 0 MTOK 2 Gl5 E 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK 2 F.14 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK 2 E14 E 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK 2 El 1 S 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig of bm. 1 0 MTOK Gl2 W 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK E.7 N&S 2 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 2 0 MTOK D.4 S 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig of bm. 1 0 MTOK E13 W 1 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 1 0 MTOK G13 E&"w 2 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 2 0 MTOK G14 E&W 2 Fillet weld on the bottom fig ofbm. 2 0 MTOK Note anv welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 15 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE~ OF _3_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST DF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED P SPECJF/CATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAW~ -" ALEX HUTCHINS ~ _,....--.1,,::...--- s1GNATUREJPR1NT OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 7:00AM 4:00PM 8 1 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By SEE ATTACHED COVER SHEET Project Superintendent Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.297 4 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WORK O INSPECTOR Ml. i-(> fl /4 OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLANS.ml SPECS {Y) {N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWIN~ ARCHITECT /JADE,L FOR WEEK ENDING d£ ..,.. 2,. c:J/ ..., 2-12r-...., PROJECT. NO. 3' 02-2---Ao i ENGINEER Hof z REPORT NO. PG OF CONTRACTOR 1,,, "-/t.(l:roN PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NO. C...Bo .tJ {) SUB-CONTRACTOR I we '"'c.~ PROJECT NAME INSPECTION ADDRESS i ~5 FAP.Dlf-' .A-Vt" . Cit·/its8/tP ADDRESS OF PROJECT SA-(Y)I£ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR {INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): ,43 £ -A-s-12--iJ71-Tg J B { .,0:::1\tl'l,s 4 4 t-11'1. WEATHER: C<si..-q... r • . 0 TEMPERATURE. 6 (} SITE TIME START: __ ·_,7<------. LUNCH PERIOO: 3 0 Y'.\ A ,-. vJ~vJ> t r-l • SAMPLES TAKEN: TESTS REQUIRED. SITE TIME FINISH: TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE OIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT .--:--I :·!9 ~ : 6 { t ') ;> 1 " .., ---~~ _ ~_:) u1---og];tl5t;--8S- signature Date of Report ICBO Certification Number 5-r I< Hp,-D I /-r l ¼ H (,?' r-' ) Print Name City / County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.297 4 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT TYPE Of WORK ~INSPECTOR OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS (Y) (N) WJ<>,Nt... APPROVED PLANS _J:tMN) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING~N) ARCHITECT fV./4 . T>&L... A-P.Gi4 iTJFC:.is. J·nc.... FOR WEEK Ej°ING ' 6 -Z -0""2- I PROJECT. NO. 3·02....2 -A oi ENGINEER J-/-D p tE. EiJ4 i N J;&,,R.1 tJ 4 REPORT NO. \ PG OF CONTRACTOR /t,G,tiTorJ CoN>~v~ otl, PLAN FILE NO. rERMIT NO. c:.861 o iC/0 SUB-CONTRACTOR WCI I /\JC... PROJECT NA~ 1 _ . £> ;I Ji/(LA· L;4-l<fE INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT SA""~ /Ci25 FA-~ oA-'1 A-IIP-, qf~L ~ 61;.D REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): A36-4s·1i. £71~ rg CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: (5} f J.. JA-L\ IGD w i?L;f>f;/l!:,_ PQRT1t<3L-~ wiE-l-DiN&. €6;V 1Pf"le-NI. FCAw [R.oGfz.S~ . AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: Fi . vl1..,. PatJ w ff l, t:> > Fo.R /'l'Jo('IJE1,/J Cor-lf\!E.6T1c r',) ,t.+T 2.J.Jf:> J;ltJ0/2 F /?JI f'/1 IN" . L (N£_. Cd,/; 7,'t t!,, jJ ~ .h ~ j.., 2 .Soii/J_ T~ w _ p; ~ ... /./o,e/Ji. 7(3, t-v & F /i'7. u. S , . / , //ft- JA&.W . ~ l,1tvNCrT1orJ.S To? i8tJTTOM t,. hi Jifl, fn/\"I.PLlT ~t:::, < ' . i2 /iJ. I . fii,(L 01vtt11L, STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL. 0~_hSEC,: < ), 2.. .., ..., JZ/4s.) "'"'£, F ,/23 .J ..J... vJf'S ., /--, REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: t) 0 StUZ..,i/E'D Wi£-l,o t N<:.r Fo~ rM fYI ,e_ ~ tJ /v'f:C"I ,o-,,) > A -r '!l\ ~ A-~o ii$-~oc.~1\ur,j, At-·,op 6t;Tro.M ( lA) £0 BEWQB~ 8S EEBCENI QE ALL WQB~ IQ08Y: eEBQENI eBQJEQI CQMELEIIQN· WEATHER: tJy'Zc./Ccv.J -J-SAMPLES TAKEN: lo (1" ' TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START:--7-+-----SITE TIME FINISH: __ q _____ _ ~ () ,A.A: LUNCH PERIOD: ___,2e....__~--=-"'C..C=---TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT __ ._/~~-~ ~ o/ 12-21tJ2-6~721SLt--8S- signature Date of Report ICBO Certification Number Print Name City/ County Certification Number Jl:ov· 7/07 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WORK ~INSPECTOR 0 TECHNICAN AVAIL6.BlE: SOil REPOf\T (Y) (N) .Rt:;,.J~/ ~ CP1M-'"ee.rc. APPROVED PlANSP) ARCHITECT NADB t-,'het;,i-t ,Teer~ /,.IC,. FOR WEEK ENDING CJ/-1/f-b"L ENGINEER i-lof>e J:3}/G,, 1f,/Jl$14r.J~ REPORT NO. PG coNTRACTOR k. G n PLAN FILE NO. ,G or.J Cr,• r'sitv6\c,f'l c.,.-. SUB·CONTRACT0R f .-,fi CoJl4'..Gf '-- PROJECT NAME 41-K£ ~StOtJ F-11B~4U> INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT I 5 is F IVM M "1 l\vE G4Ll.£64-D 5"AMe Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS {Y) lN) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (NJ lPROJECT. NO 3,.,,.,_., -AD I OF I PERMIT NO. C/3()Joi9t1 ~p. (CIJ(ef; REPORTING RRQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIRl-D 1:--ISPECTIOK ~A:'-IL'.AIA,1TG1 SOIL. ~IAXUAI. REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS .1\1\D LISTS IP THERE IS ;>;ON-CO:-IF'OR.\flNCi WORK AT THE F.ND OF Tl IE WORK DAY, OR MISSINU M fRS. AND RFIS. F.TC .• Fil.I. OUT AND A'.IT.I\CI I A DEf'JCIHNC'Y RH PORT WHEN A DEPICIENCY, YOURS OR A l'REVIOCS INSPECTOR'S. IS CORRECTED. so :-.iurs ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SLJBMIT A COPY wrrn YOL:R WEEK·s REPORTS. MATERIAlS USEO BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): • lzGfJA-1'2 , As f/VJ,._ 6iS/ c."11<-tur'ft, ~l~ P/5St~r ~ f:c_o ~s:ot,., l l-r (Ju '-1 L::>i J A-j? {?_RP~ 6.fl~ ~ 5 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT I MANPOWER USED: 15 p .p v I &t.1--t--<l_ ~ HlhvP Tvfli-$,"-,g .-i,r r-J , b' l'1 V;v\ - AREA. GAI0 LINES. PIECES OBSERVED C (lg/~J!:['j PLAC.-G ' !YT£«! fv~ 5Lttt!. o,J 4Kttoc L1/'1£ A-To 4//io l 7 (.AT~ + J;Tc!:J-·1 I I ¥ , -;Jr.-. r / _. STRUCTURAL NOTES. DETAIL. OR I\FIS user,: s J.. • \ -5 l · J rrJte. 7-7,4,. "'- REMARKS. INC1.UDING llfEET11fQIS: 13 s (J GP-11't;;:D ;)1,:i c.--r::r'U£fG. Pl1tLE /t1&J\IJ A-T n1tz. ,4/)() V"1Z u,,~Tv,-l BEWQBIS 86 eEBCEt:H OE 8LL WQBK IQ08Y· eEBQENI EBQJECI GQMELEIION: WEATHER: 0 V£,it!. CA--fJ SAMPLES TAKEI;: 7 tt ~ i',"I gf J~H,,-.lT£•:.d) TEMPERATURE: ,{'" 0 TESTS REQUIRED. SITE TIME START: __ SITE TIME FINISH: /.2- LUNCH PERIOD: _______ _ TRAVEL TIME; _____ ------ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SO NVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I THE DEFICIENCY REPORT __ ...... 1].......;;;~-. oj ,lS 01. 087,:,1.JS'+-B(J Signature Print Name 170"d 8659 0£6 09L Date of Report ICBO Certification Number Cily / County Certi1icalion Number Rev: 7/97 I17=LO Z:O-IZ:-UB(' Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 OTECHNICAN Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE· SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) FOR WEEK END!i REPORT NO. PROJECT NAMEC::,. "· t;;..,.flf\.~Lb Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 302-2,Ao) SPECS (Y) (N) PG PERMIT NO. e Cls 6 ~o \,t:{0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO D INSPECTION MANUAIJMTGL SOIL, MANUAL VIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK T THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RF1S, ETC., F1LL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: N 'A REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: -SAMPLES TAKEN: ~ TEMPERATURE: -TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME FINISH: \ ~ LUNCH PERIOD: _______ _ TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE OIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, / THE APPROV LANS, SPECI TIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT --\ 1 ll 1DL \\~132:4,°1 Date of Report ICBO Certification Number City I County Certification Number R.,u-7/07 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.297 4 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS (N) APPROVED PLANS (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) FOR WEEK ENDING -OZ-PROJE~z,tc 1 REPORT NO. PG OF ADDRESS OF PROJECT -e- REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPYWITHYOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. SITE TIME START:~7_:_<:'Z:)_~At:1~~-- LUNCH PERIOD: __ O=----- SAMPLES TAKEN:3 c.y,/ ~, TESTS REOUIRED~M AS -¢~,; 6,4_..,,, s~ &cl~ e, ,00--6 °63° SITE TIME FINISH: ---=3=-_:_,_~_M__,_ __ _ TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL I ESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR HE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFJ,CATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT , Signature /ft~e:z., Y!Wt--<-r~S C)/ I 02 t()Z. 1 Date of Report Se ZZ..'7 01--¥1 ICBO Certification Number Print Name City / County Certification Number RP.v· 7/f:17 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS {NJ APPROVED PLAN {N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) FOR WEEK ENDING 0 -05-0Z.. REPORT NO. PG OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPYWITHYOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST REPORTS): CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: AREA, GRID LINES. PIECES OBSERVED: STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL. OR RFIS USEu: REMARKS. INCLUDING MEETINGS: SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME FINISH; _______ _ LUNCH PERIOD: ________ _ TRAVEL TIME: _________ _ VERIFIED BY: I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE S INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ THE AP~ROVED LANS .S E Fl JIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT · ·· 1213/1 o; ~zzo/<f§--& ;l(;~--z:_, Date of F4i,;rt ICBO Certification Number Print Name City/ County Certification Number Rev· 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS (N) APPROVED PLANS}<() (NJ APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) FOR WEEK ENDING PROJECT. NO. 12-29-0 30 22. Pr-o { REPORT NO. PG OF PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NO. d('.3'Dr0/ 0 INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 16 2.5 FA-R ~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUALJMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: 0> :tAcL bA--Tia> Lc,.ftns. . <!orJ~. (/.81 azf-21/ 7 ;:- -5l. f sz~ / REMARKS. INCLUDING MEETINGS: ~! 7 _,,a A _ I J A~ / ALL &<:::;IJ:::S" C:Lt=;Z!Z!l_, 4'?6'4tvP'Y4c:8 ~ (..:b'~~ L::>eio°D I ~ ; Lcor<.eD Cu . ~""elf-. U-'fk Z --.,..,,_.,.. WEATHER: ovt::1?... <!.4--S ~ TEMPERATU~ ~ bO Cl SITE TIME START:___,.G~-'=©~lo~~--- LUNCH PERIOD: __ -©---=----- SAMPLES TAKEN: 2. ~ ~¥ .e.,,,__, TESTS REQUIRED: -S'Ce,,1/lf'rJ.S /,:ft/ 5 'I TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIF! ATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ~ . . . /212.'3101 Sa2-2-9c/-9-~2 Signature M Date of Report ICBO Certification Number µ/~--z__ ,. IC-,L(~S Print Name City / County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE· $~PORT (Y) (N) APPROVED PLANS (l'!(N) SPECS (Y) (NJ APPROVED SHOP ORAWING (Y) (N) ENGINEER REPORT NO. PG CONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NO. c.,g ()/ PROJECT NAME REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: / ------ AREA, GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: & Raa.c ,&c..-v-,-0 ?/ ~; C/5·-·· G STRUCTU L NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USEC,: ::5 REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: 6 REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: C: L Du /J y C. e o '- / .,,_.-I TEMPERATURE: bs / - SITE TIME START: "-~--'t)'-=-_ r_o~[) ___ _ LUNCH PERIOD: __ ,,----______ _ SAMPLES TAKEN: /1,/ /4 TESTS REQUIRED: A/ /4 SITE TIME FINISH/4..,L..C,..:_o_o ____ _ -TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOI I VESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN HE DEFICIENCY REPORT ~ ~~& / 2 I 27 10/ /618?7'(-/:8 Signature ' Date of Report ICBO Certification Number /2½ ,<) s: &er&/¼ cz-Z 5 LJ-t 5 I Print Name City/ County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.297 4 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 PUNCH LIST -DEFICIENCY REPORT PROJECT NAME:,£ /vlfoell-L /\ L.,tJ1.L r PROJECT NUMBER: -~ o2?. ~-/)c, I DATE NO. FOUND DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION EXACT LOCATION 1 J?/41/41 It!// ~J h RI'·/ A)/,, S -:;-,r ,,C-I NO/ /A f ·1 If & sf.;' J:" 7 /._ e: C ~ / r /.-:> 11 '? I I /c.AC'£ v2L<. r, C,-// ·n/i?i.J 12 2 1Z/2lfa I .~, {""--/ r vPr r" /J?Rr L) < J!Jo--r· r;R-l e L.1~£<" 6.1"1 ,c' / ?J_/-;dq 7/r< / / /~ ,/'L/9{£ ",@. 7 e. L. / A) E <: <!:,I/\ ~g.3 c1. ..(/.uU 3,I /II .3 12/27/4, I ££ /"?c ,,1£ /;LL.. ,,h,:J /_<; c' . I)/:\ .If.I!' J < rlZo JV/ :;-7/,. < I /t/1£'/!,10£ /-C ;(/ER 10.f PAGE-Z of 2 PIECE DATE INSPTD NO. CORRECT BY . ~ i - SIGNATURE:%= .j!(Cki?T: PRINT NAME:,/20".J 5· /(LL /(MC/ .ZZZ- ARCHITECT ENGINEER CONTRACTOR Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT AVAILABLE. SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (Y) (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) PR~T.!(l. IAA ~Z2 f'\U REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILLO AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. WEATHER: ClLwvv TEMPERATURE: v,-,P· r\ th}\ A-··~ i "v-1~µ ~ n-:z... SAMPLES TAKEN: L,~1,(r~ U 11,, \IL-L-'5(:?f'i,T -.:7 TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME FINISH: --=--=-'flfi'\C!..!C...\------- TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ LLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, PE ATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT l2 / W I 0( Date of Report ICBD Certification Number City / County Certification Number Rev: 7/97 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT OTECHNICAN AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) SPECS (Y (N) APPROVED PLAN (Y (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING (Y) (N) ARCHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING PROJECT. NO. ,2.-2.2...--0 'J 0"2.. "2. -Ao J ENGINEER REPORT NO. PG L OF / CONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. SUB-CONTRACTOR INSPECTION ADDRESS JS2,f;" ~ ADDRESS OF PROJECT 5~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAL/MTGL SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CDNTRACTOl'.'.L~R~~ERIAL TEST REPORTS): CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: AREA. GRID LINES, PIECES OBS~ ~ £err,~ S l REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION· WEATHER: t~ TEMPERATURE: '5-e O /-'?D SITE TIME START:~CP~~~----- LUNCH PERIOD: _______ _ SAMPLES TAKEN: /VO TESTS REQUIRED: AJ-D SITE TIME FINISH:--~'-(j_O ___ _ TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBS RVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND I OR THE APPROVED PLANS ATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT /2 I j 7 tcJ/ Signature R~rint J!l: f-s MJd-ef't. Date of Report ICBO Certification Number r~u!~uo?:6! Rev: 7/97 Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 1,1r.A!.Ul'HV~ Ultrasonic Testing c\RCHl'IECT "-''GINEER ONTRACTOR SUB-CONTRACTOR West Coast Iron u.~ECilON--WDRESS MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT . .,,. '.'\.I.L.-USW: Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 H SOIL REPORT APPROVED PLANI H SPECIFICATION~ APPROVED SHOP DRAWING FOR WEEKENDING rROJECT NO( ~d d /1/J / 9-Dec-2001 REPORTNO PG OF 3022A01 1 2 PI..\N FILE NO. rER1'llTNO. f'.P., -o I OqD PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake (1;ep. C{1<. • 9302 Jamacha Rd. San Diego .-IDDRESS OF PR~eA 15.:2S .n~,J AJrz--8:trlvffi rJ'.\e \.$(]An REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FJELD INSPECTIONMANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF 1HERE JS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT1HE END OF 1HE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MIRS AND RFIS, ETCS, FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORREC1ED, SO NO1E ON 1HE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPYWTIH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. · !-4 Ufilill .Bl.-Cv.1,'I U\.,,.C1UK {)NC C ·N< >W ··-··--···->= wNIRACTORS EQUll'MENf 'AL.\NPOWER USED --=..\. GRID I.INES. PIECE.~ OBS ER\ lID Performed Ultrasonic Testing on Columns 42A, 46A & 28A. See attactched Non-Destructive Testing Field Report. rIRUCTUR.-\l.NOIBS.DET.-lll..ORRFL~U,'ED. l\.C.(\L.\RKS. /JllC'LllDING A'1LEEI'Vi'GS: !REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: 1iEATHER: Good SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE: 70F TESTS REQUIRED: Ultrasonic Testing SITE TIME ST ART 8:00AM SITE TIME FINISH \~00PM VERIFIBDB~ d LUNCH PERIOD TRAVEL TIME I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies with soil investigation recommendations, and/ or the approved plans, specifications and applicable sectf of the Building Codes, unless otherwise noted on the deficiency report. :,& .hh~'>.c P ~ 7-Dec-2001 0111121 Signature Date ofReport AWS / ICBO Certification Number Gregory Padilla Print Name City I County Certification Number UI ,...,RASONIC TESTING REF RT REPORT NO. PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A0I DATE 12/7/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron Inc. 9302 Jamacha Rd. San Diego SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 2000 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA 2000 AWS DI.I, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL A572 REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER FLR :··LOC/PG# .. ',"' :1Dg$CRfl?TION:" :-,. .. .. AOC REJ . .. REMARK~ ',,·, ·, " '' ,, 1st 28A 4 WELDS: Continuity Plates C.J.P. 4 0 2nd 28A 8 WELDS: Continuity Plates C.J.P. 8 0 3rd 28A 8 WELDS: Continuity Plates C.J.P. 8 0 Roo 28A 8 WELDS: Continuity Plates C.J.P. 8 0 2nd 42A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 3rd 42A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 RooJ 42A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 2nd 46A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 3rd 46A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 IR.ooJ 46A 2 WELDS: Stud Beam C.J.P. 2 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 40 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-OF _2_ I HEREBY CERTIFY lHAT I HAVE INSPEClED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORlED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOlED. I HAVE FOUN~n~S WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABL~ONS OF ~VERNING BUILDING LAWS. TIMEIN TIME OUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS ~"'""""'" ""'°'0' UT/MT/PT ASNT SPECIALTY AGENCY LEVEL II NO. 8:00AM 12:00 PM 4 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MTGL, Inc. Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Tel: (714) 632-2999 FIELD REPORT Fax: (714) 632 -2974 ··--· ,. ____ ,.. : LJ SOIL REPORT 0 SPEOFICATIONS IBtrasonic Testing 0 APPROVED PLANS 0 APPROVED SHOP DRAWING == FOR WEEKENDJNG rROJECr. NO. 1-Dec-2001 3022,A0l ~,GJNEER ru:.ruRTNO. PG OF 1 1 f_;ONfRACfOR PLAN Fil.ENO. rER!>IITNO. Ce-0 I b 9 C) Keeton Construction ----SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECf NAME C:..,\V1;CIC..,"\v- West Coast Iron, Inc. (shop) Emefal Lake Corporate Center LNoPECIION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT -hxeAPN--1 AJ r; ' 9302 Jamacha Rd., Spring Valley, CA 91977 1<2.c; (A.Q..L.5 B.t\D REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTIONMANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVlEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF 'IHERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT1llE END OF 1HE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MIRS AND RFIS, ETCS .. FILL OUT AND AITACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOIB ON 1llE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPYWTTII YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ,MU Krautkramer-Branson/USN 52L; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" >'="'-""'CES1DANDACCEPTANCE&REJEC110NCRITERIA: IIWBlock, Type II; 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 IU<.C/\, GRIDIJNES, PJECES OBSERVED: Performed ultrasonic testing (UT) on complete joint penetration (CJP) welds of the following: 1. Column #27A: Continunity plates to column. flangess: 4 pl./Roof, 4 pl./3rd Fl., 4 pl./2nd Fl., 2 pl./Base. UTOK 2. Column #25A: Continunity plates to column. flangess: 4 pl./Roof, 4 pl./3rd Fl., 4 pl./2nd Fl., 2 pl./Base. UTOK 3. Column #47 A: Continunity plates to column. flangess: 4 pl./Roof, 4 pl./3rd Fl., 4 pl./2nd Fl., 2 pl./Base. UTOK 4. Column #46A: Continunity plates to column. flangess: 4 pl./Roof, 4 pl./3rd Fl., 4 pl./2nd Fl., 2 pl./Base. UTOK 5. Column#44A: Continunity plates to column. flangess: 4 pl./Roof, 4 pl./3rd Fl., 4 pl./2nd Fl., 2 pl./Base. UTOK ~u<.UCTURALNOIES,DEfAIL, ORRFJS USED: Shop Drawings ~,.INCLUDING MEETINGS: There are two CJP welds per plate connection to column flanges. Total of 140 CJP welds UTOK. !REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEAIBER: Cloudy, dry SAMPLES TAKEN: NIA ifEMPERATURE: 67 deg F TESTS REQUIRED: NIA .A SITE TIME ST ART 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 3:30 PM Jl~i(I// LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY ( II This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Services Title 24 . I ce · under nal of u pe ty pefj ry that I know the contents of these re rts and that all of the above statements po are true. 26-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date ofReport A WS I ICBO Certification Number FRANKLIN TSAI PrintName City I County Certification Number Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 '"'Vt"'-'''-"- MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT AV AJLAffLb· Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Ultrasonic Testing H SOIL REPORl APPROVED PLAN H SPECIFICATION! APPROVED SHOP DRAWING ~CHITECT FOR w=KENDING rROJECT. NO. 16-Nov-2001 3022/Wl eNGINEER ll<bPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 CONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO rRMITNr t\ -o, b q {) Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center NSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT rAeADA\.-{ West Coast Iron 93 02 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca tS2S A.JG-CAe..l..S&A.D REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAIJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE JS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS, FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, JS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ··-: Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" 1<1,nRENCE STD =,u ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 ""°"' GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED. STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USED. ~s. INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A TEMPERATURE TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM ft~T//, !LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY / I This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Services (Title . I rtify under penalty of perjmy that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 16-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City I County Certification Number UL .... RASONIC TESTING REPvRT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 30221\0l DATE 11/16/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJl 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T;G.L. ENGINEER .F.l:R': ::::DOG/PP#.::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::o:SSQR.IP.11:0N:::::::=:=:=:=:=:=:=:':':':':':':':':':=:=:=:::':':':' AC:C: :RsJ· -:':':':'.:':':':':':':':':R:SMA8K$:':':':':':':':':':':':': Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 42A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 9A CJP welding of stud beams to column flange UTOK 6 0 33A CJP welding of stud beams to column flange UTOK 6 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 42 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl.= plate; col.= column; bm. = beam; fig.= flange; conn.= connection; cont.= continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE O CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF _2_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HA VE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS K TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE ECTION FTHE VER NG BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 l 1r.c.Uf "1VlU\o. MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT AVAILAJlLE. Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Ultrasonic Testing H SOIL REPORl APPROVED PLAN H SPECIFICATION! APPROVED SHOP DRAWING lf'U\CHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT. NO. 16-Nov-2001 3022A,Ol '°'NGINEER REPORTNO PG OF 1 2 CONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. rERMIT NO. c 0 -("), " q (\ Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME ' Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT K\l?A'DA'-1 West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca 152.5 AvE -CAelS ~AD REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTIONMANUAIJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE JS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT TIIE END OF TIIE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFJS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, JS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON TIIE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY Willi YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ' ··-: Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" =r nRENCE STD AND ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 ,'1-Kl>A. GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED· STRUCTUKAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USED: ~S,INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATIIER: SAMPLES TAKEN: N/ A TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00 PM VERJFIEDBYti,1.Yl fl ,I' LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 . ./ I J This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of Genera Services (Title certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 15-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS / ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City/ County Certification Number UL_,,_RASONIC TESTING REPvRT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 30221,0l DATE 11/15/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJl 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER ·ptR' ==·=toOJP'C#''' ===·=============================·=====·=====·===·=·==oESORIPTIO;N''''''''''''''''''='='='='='='='='='='='============== ACC' ''REJ ;:;:::;:;:;:;:!:;:;:!,:·REMARKS::;:!:!!!:::!:!:!~!~!~::: Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#1s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 41A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 38A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 36A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK, 30 0 CJP welding of 3 angle beams, to cont plate UTOK 6 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 96 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS K TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABL ,SECTIO S OF THE G R G BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By '··I Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 IYPElJrWORK MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT IM==• Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Ultrasonic Testing H SOIL REPOR7 APPROVED PLAN H SPECIFICATION! APPROVED SHOP DRAWING fill.CHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT. NO. 16-Nov-2001 3022fl()l cNGINEER REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 ONTRACTOR PLANFD,ENO. rERMITNO CR-01 oCJ 0 Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center LNSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT kl.CJ.A:DA\J Ade;-West Coast Iron 9302 JamachaRd. Spring Valley, Ca t 5.;>. 6 CAe.LS /),AD REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FJElD INSPECTIONMANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. SUU\..Cl'.: Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; K.rautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" =n=NCE STD AND ACCEPJANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 """"• GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: ~TRUCTIJRAL NOTES, DETAil,, OR RF!S USED: l<J>MARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: See auached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: ~ATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A ifEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM VERIFIED BY l?~Y-// A LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 / I r This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General S ices (T" e 24 . "fy under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 14-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Nwnber Adam James 75114 Print Name City / County Certification Number UL~ RASONIC TESTING REP ~RT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022Ml DATE 11/14/2001 . -- LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER :fl;lff HtOQJBG#.:H ·1·1·:·1·:·:·r:·ri·i·i·i·i·i·:·:·:·:·:·1·1·:·:·1·:·:o:sscRIPTION:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·r:·:·:·;·:·: 1ACC: :HJ~~: :,:,:u,,:::,:,i,:,:,:,:8.:!;MARlK$',:,:,:,:,,,,,,,:,:<,= Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 40A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 23A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 24A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 90 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE = Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HA VE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND RK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, E GOVE ING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIAL1Y AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 DSA I OSHPD REPORT f ··1!,v,-UV"""-A,~ ....... : H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATIONi Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING =CIIlTECT rOR n=ENDING rROJECT NO 16-Nov-2001 302;,A0l ENGINEER REPORTNO PG OF 1 2 r.;ONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. rERMITNO. ce:i-Ot 09o Emerald Corporation ~UB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT f;1>,.1? .kDA'-f A.J€-West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca l~.'.)S O\U.SMv REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUALJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS =u,Muu==,u : Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" = =cNCE SID AND ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRJTERJA- IIW Block, Type II; 1998 A WS D 1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 """"-GRJD LINES, PIECES OBSERVED. STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAJL, OR RFIS USED. REMARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A lfEMPERATIJRE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM f]~JJ_ I LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY I I This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of Gen:,:erv/itle 2 . rtify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. ~ 13-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City / County Certification Number UL ____ RASONIC TESTING REI JRT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022!\-01 DATE 11/13/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL K.rautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE . 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Blad ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER :f:l;lR ?tQQlP:Q#? ·.·.·.·.·.·.-r.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.L·.u.·.·.·_·_-_OE$CRIBT:1.0N·.·.·.·.·.·.·!·.·.·.·.·_·_·_·_·_·_·_·.·.·.·.·.·.·_·_! AC:C! 'RSJ! !:=:,:,:::,<:!:;:,:=:!ReMARK$!:!:!<=>!:>!:::! Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 14A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 39A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 Note anv welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 60 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 ---------T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE = Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE = Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE B F MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOU THI WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APP CABLES TIONS O E G RNING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS Q.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 DSA I OSHPD REPORT rr.r.O• w0Kl't. AV AJLAt>U:.: H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING =CHITECT FOR w """ ENDING rROJECT NO 16-Nov-2001 3022~)1 ENGINEER REPORT NO PG OF 1 2 ONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. rRMITNO. CA -OL ()q n Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME I Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION AODRESS AODRESS OF PROJECT tl'¾~DA'( At.Iv -Qre,\.6 ~AD West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca \ 5;;._5 REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUALJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF TilERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT TIIE END OF TIIE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON TilE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMlT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ·-·- Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" ""'""""CE STD AND ACCEPTANCE& REJECTION CRJTERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 AK1:.A, GRJD LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: >TRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USED. ~MARK.S,INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attacl,ed field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER· SAMPLES TAKEN: N/ A TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM VERJFIED BY /2, di LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 / I This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of Gene~! Se · es ( · 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 12-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City/ County Certification Number Ul.. .... 'RASONIC TESTING REI JRT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022,A0I DATE 11/12/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIP 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER flWR HWOCJP:¢#.? .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,OJ;$QRIBTIP.'N,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.;.;.,.,.,.,.,i,.,.,.-.,., 1ACC: :RSUi :1:::::c::1:::tH.H~MARKS;:!Hli:ilHliHH!Hi Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section I" from web. 18A All repairs were re-inspected and accepted UTOK X 0 35A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 3A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 60 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST-OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOU THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICAB ECTIONS GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALlY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 DSA I OSHPD REPORT rn:.vr'WOl<..11.. AVAJLAt<lli. H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING ,,...CHJlECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT NO. 3022,f,;01 9-Nov-2001 c.-um=~ REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 ONTRACTuR PLANF!lliNO. rERMITNO Emerald Corporation c0-oto9D ~UB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center NSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT ~!?.AV~ kJG-West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca t5d.5 [A{2.,V.S&A0 REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE JS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ···-· ,,vu•...,,,.,,._,...,...,._, : Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" ==NCnSIDANDACCEPTANCE&REJECTJONCRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 """"-GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED. STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USED: ,_,,,,=S, INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM VERIFIEDBY ~ LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 / This is to certify that the above re orted inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and s ecifications and the ruf;s and regulations of the De artment of p p 24). I certify under penalty ofperjwy that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. 8-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City / County Certification Number UL~ RASONIC TESTING REI RT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022~ DATE 11/8/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP _2f_ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 A ws D 1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERlfl 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER ----------------- fi;iR : ?WQQJP:C#.Hl :,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:.:.:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,OE$CRIP:TIQN,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:.:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:.:,:,:,:,:, IACG :J1'!W ':'.:'.:'.'.':'.:::'.:'.:'.:'.::::RJEMARKS''.::::::::==:::=:::=::·:= Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section l" from web. 17A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 SA CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 6A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 Note any welds reoaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 90 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICA"LICABL TIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT RE_G. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By 1-'roJect Superintendent Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 l ·------A VrULr\.OLC: H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING "'"'Clll'JECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT. NO. 9-Nov-2001 3022-,4()1 "NGINEER REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 ONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO rERMITNO. CB -o ID 9 D Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT fu ,_,,.._A,...\ Ale: -C:Aus BAD West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca t5;t5 REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FJELD INSPECTIONMANUAIJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS, FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" ""1"r.=NCE STD AND ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRJTERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 !'\=A, ORJD LINES, PIECES OBSERVED. ~TRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFIS USED. 1<J,MARKS, INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. !REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: !WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A !rEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM ~ LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY • , -.,c ( , - This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Servic (Title 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. ~ 9-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report AWS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City/ County Certifica!Jon Number UL_,,_RASONIC TESTING REI ..,RT REPORT NO. -----. PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022~1 DATE 11/9/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP X FIELD -- EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIWBlock ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER ~RUR 1 /!l;QQ/P.C#.\ ·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=·=-=·-OE$CRlBJIQN,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., :AOC 1 iRJEJ . :::::::::::::::::::::::::REMARtS:::'.:::::=::::::::::::::: Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 16A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 26A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 37A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK, and T,B flanges of angle beam to cont plates UTOK 36 0 Note anv welds reoaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 96 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; sti£ = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIOaABLE CTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-Of-2_ TIMEIN Tl,MEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 DSA I OSHPD REPORT . 1 re. vr vv(Jl{K Avn.u..ru;,J.J,;,: H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING IU<CHlTECT FOK WEEK ENDING rROJECT. NO. 3022~)1 9-Nov-2001 oNGINEER REPORTNO. PG OF 1 2 ONTRACIOR PLAN FILE NO. rERMITNO.c.,e -01 o 9 0 Emerald Corporation SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION ADDRESS ADD1<o>S OF PROJECT -\1\ a.A n,A.-1..1 Ai I ~ -West Coast Iron 9302 JamachaRd. Spring Valley, Ca \5:25 lA~SP..AO REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAIJMTG SOil,MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF TiiERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., Fil,L OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S,.IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. r--'<vu••------Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" "1'FERENCE STD AND ACCEPTANCE &REJECTJON CRl,=-u,: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 ru="' GRID LINES. PIECES OBSERVED. ~TRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RFJS USED. ~S, /NCLUD/NG MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: !WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A lfEMPERATURE· TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM ~ ~UNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY -1 / . This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Services · e 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. ~ 7-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Nwnber Adam James 75114 Print Name City I County Certifical!on Nwnber UL .... RASONIC TESTING REI _RT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022/,)p} DATE 11/7/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERlfl 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER :!BUR \80P1P:C#\ :rrnrnrn::H:::::rn:::::::·:::r:::::::H\QfSCRIPTIQN::::1:::n:rnHHl:HHHHl?:::::::::::::t:1 =Ace: =RSJ: :::::u::::t::::::1::REMARK$\\HH::::::::::nn::n: Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 13A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 2A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 18A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK, except for slag inclusions @3/8", 3/4"x3",3/8", 3/8", 3/4"x3", 3/4", 3/4", 3/4", 3/4", 3/4", 3/4", 5/8", 3/4", and 1/2" in depth. These were all flux core welds. 14 16 no repairs made Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 54 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 16 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE = Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFl~LICAB TIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-OF _2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any ins~ending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. ~ Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L Sa:n Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 ll rrc.ur wORK A,="~· H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING f"U\.CHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT NO. 3022:&~ 9-Nov-2001 ~GINEER REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 i.;ONTRACTOR PLAN FILE NO. rER1'!1TNO Emerald Corporation CB -o ( o 9 () SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center INSPECTION ADDRESS ADTs2~~JECTki m-da d Me -({'_.. \s bG...d West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca REPORT REQUIREMENTS: JCBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE JS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFJS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, JS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. C"<.UU-MC.l' .. -·v,mvu~ l'U~V Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; K.rautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" =ERENCE SID AND ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 AWS D1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 i'U'l'A. GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: >TRUCTIJRAL NOTES, DETAIL, OR RF!S uSED. ,,,,,.~s, INCL/JD/NG MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: [WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: NI A tfEMPERATURE· TESTS REQUIRED: NI A SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM VERIFIED BY cZ-q LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 / .. /. This 1s to certify that the above reported mspect10ns were made m accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulat10ns of the Department of /ene Se ·c (Title 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. t:;d 6-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report A WS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City I Cotmty Certification Number UL .... RASONIC TESTING REI __,RT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022t'.\:0l DATE 11/6/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP Jf_ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USNS0; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, PartF REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERlfi 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER ----------------- :f);lff /!i;OC!J?Q#.\ /HHHfffHHHH/fJ)E$QRl?TIQNt?H/???ttttt?\ .ACCf iR~J: :::::i:::::HH:fl?/H:t;MARK$H/lf\\),f!\(f::n Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section l" from web. 32A CJP welding of stud beams to column flange UTOK 6 0 34A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 7A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 4A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK, except for one class A defect @ 1/2" depth & 1/2" in length, and one class A defect@3/4" depth & 3" in length, both determined to be lack of fusion. Both were repaired and accepted. 30 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 96 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. VE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, D APP ICAB ECT ONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. ECTOR UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF-2- TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632 -2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. DSA I OSHPD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 11rn,vrwv= H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING == FOR WEEK ENDING lffiOJECT. NO. 23-Nov-2001 3022~)1 e.NOINEER REPORTNO. PO OF 1 2 ON1RACTOR P'-""• ~J.W,.,NO. rERMITC: 0e -0 I oqo Emerald Corporation SUB-CON1RACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporate Center ..,,,-,,CIJON ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT ~e1>..0A~ AJB -CA.e.L-~~D West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca \~S .Q.EPORT REQUIREMENTS: lCBOFmlD INSPECTIONMANUAIJMTGSOILMANUAL REVlEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IFTIIERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORKDAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFlCIBNCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY wrm YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. F<""'"-· Krautkramer-Branson/USN 50; Krautkramer: 2.25 Mhz: 0 deg, 1.00" Dia; 45, 60, 70 deg, 0.75" x 0.75" ""rc=CESTIJANDACCEPumCE&=,e,.,,ONCRITERIA: IIW Block, Type II; 1998 A WS D 1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 and 6.2 or 6.3 =. GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: w,u~'1URALNOu:-i,DlffA!L, O0<0<rlS U,c.u: -· """"=,INCLUD/Nr; MEETINGS: See attacJ,edfield report, nothingfurther . . !REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: !WEATHER: SAMPLESTAKEN: NIA TEMPERATURE: TESTSREQUIRED: NIA SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM ~ LUNCH P~RIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED BY l ,, This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Servi · e 24). I certify under penalty ofperjwy that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are true. ~ 19-Nov-2001 ASNT UT Level II Date of Report AWS I ICBO Certification Number Adam James 75114 Print Name City/ County Certification Number uL· ...... <A~Ul~lL l ~~ 111~\J ~rt. _ .. 1 REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Corporation Center JOB NO. 3022~_!_ DATE 11/19/2001 LOCATION West Coast Iron 9302 Jamacha Rd. Spring Valley, Ca SHOP~ FIELD EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL Steel . REPRESENTING M.T.G.L. ENGINEER ffitBll ftQ~H .JLU.U.U.U.LLU.LLtLU.U.LUOOSCRIP:l.l~L\.ifUJU.{t.i.U.Uf./U) "A'CCl :mffiJ 1:1:;:(:1:1:(:1:(:i,1,;,~~$;:i:i:]:]:/:):(:(:/:(:/:/ Ultrasonic testing was conducted on CJP welding of column cont. plates, stud beam to flange connections, angle plate flange to cont. plate connections. Results ID#'s are as follows. All electroslag welds were not inspected in the K section 1" from web. 43A CJP welding of cont plates to column flange UTOK 30 0 -· Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Totar No. of Welds Accepted: 30 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVELII SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_ OF __L_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS Q.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any ins~ · n extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By Project Superintendent I\ Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 11120 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022AOI Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 1/9/02 6 X 12 28 1/30/02 6X 12 28 1/30/02 6 X 12 28H 1/30/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 4,000 Location: GB ON 1.4 & E. 7 PSI Cast By: MICHAEL PHILLIPS Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 4033504 Ticket No.: 257098 Water added at Site: 5.00 gal. By Cement Type: Slump: 4.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Mix Time: 43 Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 29.03 28.35 28.35 28.46 (lbs.) 110500 150500 151.000 on 1/2/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 60 Ambient Temp: 55 Admixture: (psi) 3,806 5.309 5.326 Date Received: 1/3/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTMC1064 Respectfully Submitted, 5,318 28-day test complies with specified strength. I\ " Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 11121 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 1/9/02 6X 12 28 1/30/02 6X 12 28 1/30/02 6 X 12 28H 1/30/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 4,000 PSI Cast By: MICHAEL PHILLIPS Location: FTG SERPENTINE WALL ON C, 1 TO 3 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 4033504 Ticket No.: 257197 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: 50 Slump: 5.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 29.03 28.35 28.35 28.46 (lbs.) 111.000 145.500 150.000 on 1/2/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 62 Ambient Temp: 64 Admixture: (psi) 3.823 5.132 5,291 Date Received: 1/3/02 % ASTMC231 PCF ASTMC138 •F •F ASTM Cl064 Respectfully Submitted, 5,212 28-day test complies with specified strength. " Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 11102 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORA TE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size (Sq. Inch) 7 1/2/02 6X 12 28.42 28 1/23/02 6X 12 28.43 28 1/23/02 6 X 12 28.43 Specified Strength: 4,000 PSI Cast By: F ARHAD T ALEGHANI Location: BTM OF ELEV ATOR PIT @ C & D/3-4 Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 4033504 Ticket No.: Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: IIN Mix Time: 30 Slump: 4.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. (lbs.) (psi) 87.000 3.062 124.000 4362 125.500 4.415 on 12/26/01 Date Received: 12/27/01 Air: % ASTM C231 Unit Weight: PCF ASTMC138 Concrete Temp: 75 •F ASTM C1064 Ambient Temp: •F Admixture: WRDA-64 Respectfully Submitted, 4,389 28-day test complies with specified strength. /1. A Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 11122 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A01 Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP/ DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: A Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 1/9/02 6 X 12 28 1/30/02 6X 12 28 1/30/02 6 X 12 28H 1/30/02 6 X 12 Specified Strength: 3,000 PSI Cast By: MICHAEL PHILLIPS Location: EAST SIDE FTG MECH. ENCLOSURE Concrete Supplier: ESCONDIDO READY MIX Mix No.: 8355P Ticket No.: 209914 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: Mix Time: Slump: 5.50 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 29.03 28.35 28.35 28.46 (lbs.) 67,000 99,000 95.500 on 1/2/02 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 63 Ambient Temp: 64 Admixture: (psi) 2.308 3.492 3.369 Date Received: 1/3/02 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTM C138 OF OF ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 3,430 28-day test complies with specified strength. /I Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION Set No.: 11111 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0I Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 1/4/02 6X 12 28 1/25/02 6 X 12 28 1/25/02 6 X 12 28H 1/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 4,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location:@ 15 @G, GRADE BEAM/FOOTINGS Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 4033504 (Sq. Inch) (lbs.) 28.57 82,500 28.36 121,000 28.36 118,000 28.46 on 12/28/01 Air: Unit Weight: (psi) 2,888 4.267 4,161 Date Received: 12/31/01 % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 /I Ticket No.: 256093 Concrete Temp: 59 Ambient Temp: 60 Admixture: "F "F ASTM C1064 Water added at Site: gal. By Cement Type: MixTime: 64 Slump: 5.00 in. ASTM C143 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS. INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. Respectfully Submitted, 4,214 28-day test complies with specified strength. " Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Report of: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-CONCRETE **LAB COPY** Client: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATION SetNo.: 11112 ASTM C39/1231 Branch Office 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 Project No.: 3022A0J Project Name: EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE 1525 FARADAY A VENUE CARLSBAD, CA BP I DSA No.: CB-01090 Plan File No.: " Age Date Nominal Actual Area Load Strength (Days) Size 7 1/4/02 6X 12 28 1/25/02 6X 12 28 1/25/02 6X 12 28H 1/25/02 6X 12 Specified Strength: 4,000 PSI Cast By: JASON JOHANNESEN Location: GRADE BEAMS/FOOTINGS @ 15 @ F Concrete Supplier: HANSON Mix No.: 4033504 Ticket No.: 256260 Water added at Site: 10.00 gal. By CONTRACTOR Cement Type: MixTime: 67 Slump: 4.25 in. ASTM Cl43 Remarks: Distribution: NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION SCOTT CO. NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC.-RON GROSS KEETON CONSTRUCTION **LAB COPY** min. (Sq. Inch) 28.57 28.36 28.36 28.46 (lbs.) 96.500 132,000 133.500 on 12/28/01 Air: Unit Weight: Concrete Temp: 60 Ambient Temp: 64 Admixture: (psi) 3,378 4,655 4.707 Date Received: 12/31/0 l % ASTM C231 PCF ASTMC138 "F "F ASTM C1064 Respectfully Submitted, 4,681 28-day test complies with specified strength. Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: n ~ .. :- 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT OTeCHHICAN AVAIi.ABLE: SOIL REPOllT (V) {N) APPAOVEDP Pl.MF/LENO. Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 9.2243 Toll Free: sn.sss.TSST Tel: 760.482,0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 # C\l<. . REPOJt'i'l"l'-lG ImQOOtEMEN'l'S: DO pmu::, JNSPECTlO:N MANUAl'.JM'J'aL son., MANUAL IUNlBW Pl'lE\'IOUS REPORTS AND lJSTS IPTHElUSJS NON-CONFORMING WORK.Kr'm'.EEND Or;"'J'H8 WORKDAY, ORMlSSING MTRS. AND RF.IS, B'l'C., .FILLOU'I' AND .AITAC8 ADEPIC!ENCY REPO)n' WHEN A bEFlCIBNC-Y, YOURS Ok A PnEVrous J1'1SPECTO~·s, IS CORlU!CTED, so NOTE ON TH); ORIGINAL :OEFICIENCV R.a'()I(f AND SUBMIT A COPYW.i'I'RYOUR WEE!JC'S REPORTS. MATEIIIM.S USW BY cotlTRACTOR (lhtl.UDE RESW!CH 1!£PORt NO. OR MAW!IAL TtST Rfl'OIITS}; SITETIME START; __ 7._ ___ _ LUNCH PEAIOD: __ .___ ___ _ A SAf,M>i.ES TAl<ett TESTS AElllllREO: SITE'llME FINISH:_2 _____ J...=:J_O ___ _ TRAVEL TIME; _______ _ 6() '211. - I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OSSERVED ALL OF TliE'WOflK LIS'rro ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH TH IL INVESTIGATION MCOMMOOATIONS, ANO/ OR 'rHE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF tHE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT T~ . . ct'l...-, l3 , a'1....-e,B7i'J~ --sr Sla11a1t1111 Datu ot Report ,ceo Cer1lflcalloR NlllllbeJ' &t~filD ~IP-f µlt:rv \ Corporate: () 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax; B58.537.3990 FIELD REPORT 0 'IB:t!NICAN AVAi~ SOIL REPORT M (N) APPI\MD PLANS ) REPORT HO, 2,. 7 Pl.AN fllE HO. ADDRESS OF PROJec't PG Branch: 441 W. State.Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: an.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 OF REPORTING REQUIJUtMtN'fS: ICBO FJELD INSl>RCTION MANUAI.JMTGLSOIL. MANOAt. RffilIBWPRBVIOUS RBPO:ll:I'SAND JJSTS IFTHBRE IS :NON-CONFORMING WO}U(ATTim END OPTHB WORK DAY, oi MISSING MTRS, AND RF.IS, EtC., FU..l. OUT AND ATIACHAD:E.FlCXENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY. YOlmS oi A PREVIOUS 1NSPEC'l'OR'$, XS CORREC'IED, SO NOTE ONT.HE OR!:GJNAL DEFICIENCY RBPOkr AND SUBMIT A con WlTHYOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. BEWORK AS PERCENT PE ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJ,CT COMPLElJON; TEMPERATIJRE: "JESTS REOUIREO. SITE TIME START:--'7-+-----'?-~A ti1 SlTETIMI: l'lNISK:_._,;i. __ ., ___ _ LUNCH PERIOD:--------TRAVEL TIME; _______ _ VERIFIED l!Y: I DD CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONAU.Y OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE IL INVESTIGATIOlf RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICf IONS_ AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTm IN TttE DEACIENCV REPOR'r t~ o~ ,:i.2., a-i ai7?-IS<e~- s1on111111 Date of Report ICBC Cenlflcallon Number FiJ:ll J.H}D 17}1_£ 4 J-} A-I-"} Print Name Cny / COunty ColtlffClllon Numbet 0 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: ,C1\ !;.::-W ,:;,,r 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT AVAII.ABI.E: SOIL HEPORT IV) (N) .APPRO~l.l Pl.AAS jfJ IHI l!EPORT HO. .) 6 PLAN FIL~ NO, Al>Dfi£SS Df PROJECT 0 PG Branch; 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: an.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 Sl'fCS (Y)("! APPIIQVEII SHOP DIIAWINS "'-tH) PROJECT, NO, lv}...-Ao OF JIEPO:ra'.llllG REQUJREMENTS: ICBO FIEU> INSPECTIOl-4 MANUAJ./MTGL son.. MAl«/Al. REVIEW PREVIOUS Rm'ORTS AND um JF THE.RE ts NON-CONFORMING WOlUCATTHB END OPTHEWORXDAY. OR MISS~ MT.R.S,AND RFIS, ETC., r1IL OUT AND ATI'ACff A b);;flCIENCY RBPOltt WlmN A. DEFICIENCY, YOUll.S OR. A PREVIOUS JNSPECTOR'S, IS'CORREC'I'6'D, SO NOI'E ON nm ORIOINAL DEFICIENCY RllPOR'r AND SUBMIT A COPY Wl'r.ffYOUR WEEK'S RE.PCll.TS, ·£7/,..T't, CotrnlACTOIIS EOIJIPMEWT / Wtd'OWtR USED! 5'!11UCTUJW. NOTES, DETAIL, OIi RFIS USEfr. Llt:d-Jlll'r'. · REWORK AS PERCENT Of ALL WORK TODAY; PERCENT PBQJEGT COMPLETION: waTHEII; ~ ' SAMPLES 'l'AKEN: TEMPERAl\JRE': 7 s-C) SITI: TIME START:~__,?.___ ___ _ SITE TIME FINISH: 3 ! 1 Q • WNCH PERIOD! 1 fl ~ TAAVEL TIME;--------VEs:\IFIEO 8 , I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSDNAU.Y OBS~VfD ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ~BOVE MO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES Wlnf THE OIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND I OR THE APPROVED PL.ANS, SPECIFICATIO~ AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OlllERWISe NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT • _____ :ft ....... ~------,:_, a ,_ , .:2, f , a 2.. a B 7 2/ S l.f-8.r Slgnalu" '7t,e,;j,4-.o Dito of Report PrlnlNamt City t Cutiirtv Ceitiffcatlon NUIJWOJ ENGINEER CONTI\ACTOR (.) Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel; 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537 .3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT ~ JNSPECTOII AVAILAB!.£: SOIL REPOI\T (VI (N) ot-~ At'PROIIED Pl.ANS !NI FOi! art. ENOl""8 2 -Z d~ ~-Rfl'ORTNO. P6 u..,.J5t Lv&i~. Pl.AN FILE NO, wL,\ LtJG. PIIOJEC'r NAME £,z,LA-D A.ODFIESS DI' !'ROJJiCT ~~Af Pfr1 ~ Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482,0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (Y) INJ APPROVEll SHOr' ORAWI~) l'IIO.£CT. NO, OF PEIU.tl'rNO. LA--/e-€_ lt.EPORTING REQ{mtl\;MENTS: ICBO FlELDINSPECTIONMANUAL/MTO!. SOIL. MANUAL RBVlEW PREVIOUS Rm>olrrSAND LISTS . IPrnBRE lS NON-CONFORMJNO WO}U{J>{f TiffiBNO OF'I'Hlo WORKDAY. oa M!SSXNG MTRS,AND ms. ETC~ PILL OUT ANDA'lTACH A DBF.l~CY R.EroKr WHEN A DErlCn:!NCY. YOURS OR A l'lUMOUS INSPECTOlt'S, lS CORRECTBD, SO ~om ON THE OlUOINAL l:>BFicmNCY REPORT AND SUBMIT ACO:l'YWITHYOUR. WEEK'S lUSPORTS, AREA, lll!ID LINES, Pl$;!;$ 08llERVED! ~ "'s ,:,c;, ,-.0 STRUCTVAAI. ko'ln, DETAI\., 011 RFl6 USED: I-~ ... {, l ""L SAMPLES TAKEN: } t/ Slll:TIME STAJIT;......,~y-=------SJTETIME Flt41SH:.z::;..:;;-:..o1 :;......;;0 ___ ~ LUNCH PERIOD; ______ _ TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PEASOIVALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE IL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED Pl.AMS, Sf>ECIFICATIO~S AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT ----'~'--~--~ . 6?.., 2..,/, c:, L-!r.872--tS te-8·'8 Slgnaturi, DaJa of Report ICBO Cortltlcalkm NuJ11bor F kit l1-AD P,L t¼klttc-:1 Prim Name City I County Confflcatlbb N11111ber Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel; 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT TYPE OF WOl!K NSP£CTOll O lECHNICAN AVAIWL£: &OIL flfl'ORT ff) (N) Wl,IA:>1 At-4 · APP!\MD PI.Alffl;io, IN} Pl.Alf FILE ND. INSPECl'ION ADDRESS 1 o. PG Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 780.482.0800 Fax: 760.482.0650 s~ IYl<NI A1'PRO\IED SHOP DRAWING (NI PIIOJ£CT. NO. 1 o~,__A0 OF REPOJlTil'l'G RIQUIUMENT8: ICBO FIELD lNSPBCr!ON MANUALIM1'0!. son.. MANUAL REVmw PREVIOUS REPORI'S AND USTS IPrn:BRE IS NON-CONFORMINO WOltKAT'Ure END OF THE WORK DAY. OR MlSSlNG ~.AND RF1S, ETC., FILL OUT ANl:I .AlTACH A DEPICIBNCY RBPO!tt WHEN A DEFICIENCY. YOURS ORA PREVJOUS INSPECTOR'S. rs co~. so NOI'B ON nm ORIGINAL DEl1IcmNCY REPORl' AND SUBMIT A COPY WITHYOllll wtreK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY COlflAAGTOR (INCWDE RESEARCH REPORT NO. ()11 MATEAIAL mr REPORTS)! .-4~ 6 -.F7ol 9 -Z6o '.l-l.. -/YJ.Z.tA--t--O~· 411-18 CONTRACTOl\8 EQUIPMENT I ~ USED: STRUCTURAL NOTES. DEiAI.. OR RflS useo: SAt,1/'t.tS TAKEN: TEMl'EAATUIIE': 7 /J • TESTII REOIIIREO: srre TIME S'fARl: 7 SITE TIMEflNISH: J !.. J 0 LUNCH PERIOD: )' I ""-' TRl~L TIME; _______ _ I DO CERTIFY TlfAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH TliE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND/ OR THJ: APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS_ AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT · T~ -----------0 d<-I :).() I IJ ')_ 0 <a 7 ;l. I-ttp .... g.<,"' Sign alu rl! ICBO Certlllcallon Nlitllber /4-ntH..+D rAt-£q N,+"', TYPE Of WORK Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537 .3990 FIELD REPORT 0 INSPECTOR O lECHNICAN Cof'\/C,f{:, !'£, PLAN FILE NO. ADDRESS OF l'IIOJECT P$ Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TESi Tel: 760.482,0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 llF \0 9\:> 'REPORTING Rll:QUOlEMEl'ffll: ICBO FlE1.D INSPECTION MANUAIJMTGt. SOIL, MANUAi'... RSVlBW PIUMO'Os Jml'ORTS AND USTs IP TIIERE IS NON-CONl'O~O WORK Ai11lE END OPTIIBWO}U('. bA-y; 0~ MISSING MTR.S. AND RF.IS, ETC., FlLL OOT ANDA:ITACH A D:SrlCIBNCYREPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, 'i"OUR.s OR A PREVIOUS INSPECWR'S, IS CO:R.R:ECTED, SO NOTB ON TH}; ORIGINAL DEFICIENC).' R:El>ORI' AND SUBMIT A COPY'Wltff YOW. WEEK'S R.Bl>CJR.TS. MAliRW.S USED BY CONTRACTOII (INCl.UD£ REsEAIICH IIB'OIIT NO, OR MATERLII. TEST llf POIIT$): 1 ~Ut}tl, A-,stJ,,, A-7"6 -A:5 ~ ~ AAEA. 0111D LINES, Pl~~'ifll: .. 1 D ~p :z.r- STRUCTURAi. NOTES, DET~ll. OR RFIS usai:5 . '2' SITE TIME START: _3 J.,.):f} LUNCH PERIOD; ______ _ £lA<_ ,s d..k s.w/'LES TAKEN: l'ESTsREOUIRED; TRAVEL TIME: _______ _ I PO CERTIFY TH4T I HAVE f'eRSONALl.Y OBSERVEO All OF THE WORK LISTl:D ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WlfH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMt,IENDATIONS, JWD I OR THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATION~ AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIE~CY REPORT __ u,__~ ./ o2..., ,o, o l... o@7..l-,stt-~ 4b SigllJlllra Dab, of Report ICSO Cllfllf1c111l1)fl Number Clly I COlllltv Ctrtiflt:atlon Number Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G Ban Diego, CA 92121 iel: 858.537.3999 Fax; 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT 1YPE OF WORK ~~R O lB:HNICAN AVAILULE: · a1:>1NGt APPROVED Pl.A AIICHlm:T N/tD'l!-t.. ENGINEER /-lo '€ $-,J"t:r • REl'ORT NO. St l.t- PUN FILE NO, SU&-CONTJIAC'TOI\ w G) l t.J (.. . Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: an.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 sm8 (Y!CNl ~ .tPl'IIOVaJ SHOP DAAY/l~Nl l'!IOJECT. NO. lo 22.... a I REPORTING REQ'UXREMENTS: ICBO FlELD INSPECtlON MANUAUMrGI. SOIL, MANUAL REVIEW :J'MVIOUS RBl'ORJ;S AND LISTS !FT.HERE rs NON-CONFORMING WORK ATTIIB END OFTHEW0roe DAY. OR MISSING MIRS, AND RFJS, li:l'C~ FlLL OUT AN};)ATIACHA DBF.(CIENCY RBPORl.' WBEN A DEFICIENCY, \l'OURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPEC'l'OR' S, IS COR:R.Ec.-nm, SO NOfB ON ffiE ORIGINAL DBFlelliNCY REPORT ANb SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR \VBBK'S REPOR.'X'S, MA'll:RIALS USED BY COJiTAAC't'OR (INCLUDE ~ESW!mt REPORT NO, 0A MATERIAL TEST Fl&OR'IS): A JI• WEATHBl: ~ .. 11 la1PffiA'nJRE: 60-771 TfSts REDIJIRED; SITE Tl~STAAt--7-F-----srrerlME RN1S1-1: ......... S,a.._.:_v ___ _ . LUNCH PERIOD; · M ~ TRAVB. TIME: _______ _ I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSOtiALLY OBSERVED ALL OF TIU: WORK LISTED ABOVE AND THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH T SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMEtfDATIONS, ANO / OR THE APPROVto PLANS, Sf>ECIACATIO~ AND APl'LICABlf SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT 74~ d:;l_ I /1 I 0"L Siona1U111 Dale of Report ICBO Centlltalloh Nu111bar ~)---}41'-) Print Name City, c~ Csnlflcatlon Number Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632,2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT SOIL flEl'Olff (YI (NJ APPROVED Pl.ANS (N) REPORTN(). PUN Fil.ENO. Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tolf Free: 877 .563. TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 Sf'ECS (Y) (N) -""'IIOVEO SHoP ORAWIJiG (N) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICl!O FllUJ) INSPECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL RBVIEWl>lU>VJOUS REPORTS AN:0 USTS IF THER£ JS !-ION-CONFORMINO WORKA'rTHE END O'F Tm; WORK DAY, OR MlSSXNG IlflRS, AND RA'S, E!C., l'1U. OUT AND ATI'ACF!A DEFICIENCY Rro>oRl' WHEN A DErlCIEN<;Y, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOI'EONTHE ORIGINAL l:iEF'lCIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WIT8YOUR WBBK'S lIBPORXS. $Tf\lSC'rullAL NOTES, DETAIi.. OR F!FIS usm: REWORK AS PERCENT Of ALL WORK JQPAY: PERCENT PROJECT CQMPLEDQN: WFATHER: ~ ... TfMPER4lUAE: 6 0 ..,_ 7l'J SITE TIMI; START: __ 7_,__ ___ , LUNCH PERIOD: J O ~ TEST'S REOUlREO: TRAYa TIME; _______ _ 1N ~ · I DO CERTIFY THAT l HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO TliAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE IL INVESTIGATION JU;COMMENDATJONS, AND/ OR THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIO~ AND APPLICABLE SECTION Of THE BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOfED IN THE DEACIENCY REPORT 'Ja_0y~ · o .2 dB , o ';), oeJ7.21 s lt--Br S111nawrv Date of Floport ICBO Certllk:Btlon Number f2tlcf/eQ '/21-LftaH,,ttl) . Print Name · Cltt / County Col1itlt.atfon Number ·02/27/2002 WED 10:32 FAX 444 MTGL-ANAHEIM Corporate: 2982 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 731$ Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537 .3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 141009/013 Branch; 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 9224$ Toll Free: 877.563.TEST- Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 DSA / OSHPD REPORT ~ AVAIUBL!:· SOIL REPORT (Y) (N} SP£CS M (N) APPROVED PLANS@ (NJ APPROVED SHOP DRAWi~ !Y) (N) ARCHITllCT FIJI WEEK ENDING ~ l'AOJECt NO. z.. -t..: --<' ""L o-z..,'2..-.A-o ENGIN!i£R REPOFIT NO. 1'13 L OF I CONTRACTOR ~ALl:NO. PERMIT NO-c: ~: O I ") D sue-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME L cm_ INSPFCTION AnORESS u~ ADDRESS OF PFIOJliCT 1-.n..~ ?A.flA. ~A-W-L nm'()K'flNG REQUIREMENTS: IC::DO l"lELD INSPECTION MANUAIJMTO~ son.. MANUAL REVIEWPRhVJOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON-C:ON!'ORMING WORK AT Tiffi r.ND CJFTHE WORK DAY. OR MISSINCl MTRS, AND RFIS. ETC .. FILL 01.n ANI) ATI'/\CH A DEFICIENCY IU,PC>R-r WlffiN A DHFIC-.JENCY, YOURS OR A J'IUiVIOUS INSPECTOR'S. TS CORRF.C-:Ttm. SO NOTE ON 'llil:! UKllilNAI, l)Ht,1CIUNCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOIIR WEEK'S REPORTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONlRACTDR (INCLUDf RESEAAC!l REPORT Jfi°R MAWIIAL m1 REPORTS)· Al~, ~ 12 .... CONTRACTOR& EQUIPMENT/ MANFOWEII USED: RFMARKS. INct.UD/110 Mlet/N 111'£ATHER· ~ TEMPERATIJRC: 7 0 SITE TIME START: 1 l~ L SAMl'LCS TAKEN,l)o 1ms111:Qur11ev?vcJ SITE TIME FINISH: _j_ _..2.,s.O~--- TRAViL TIME: -- IL ,..-.,n..,.,,...-, inspections wete made in accordance with the approve11 plans and specilicaUons and the rules and regulatlons ol the f!!m:rt,.al~llffl~~~~~ • I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the allove statements are true. 2-t/t& , o 2 ... ~O"cZ¥8r Date of Report 1&0 Cortlfk:ation Numl!Cr ~~~N:~~ R&ll! 7/fff ·02/27/2002 WED 10:32 FAX ,,, MTGL-ANAHEIM 11,,\79U.lil'~ll,JU~I._, .OH .. • '41010/013 Pagejof ( NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING REPORT .,J.i,, i. ~ ~ UJI LJ b~-lt:. (J • rr.. A vA l rr. I 1----+-----l-"~~........,=,.p:..J,--....-----L...L.>'"""-'-.&.:.....::~-i,-.~--, --+----------1 I i-----+-----+-----------------+---IJ--+-,-,---1i t------t------t-------------~p--~+-----i---+------1 t----f------+---------------------f----f--~ I .. J ---------------------~------------!----~ 1 __ , =t 1 --------------~--------.......--+!--·-___ ! ----------------1----,i---+-' -~ I ! i I I I j . I _, .__ _____ --! ---+-----t---------------·--+----+-----1-----1-----+-----1--~-----------.--~-. ..,_..--+---t---·--·-· i------t---~-+----,-----------------+---1-----+r---.! ---------~---------~--------i-----+----1' ----------------~-------~ I .__ __ _,___ ___ ..L-______ ___, ________ ...,___ .___...;...._~r ____ J 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 MUN'l,ANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT 904 Rancheros Drive, Sui San Marcos, California 92 Tel: (760) 735-5 Fax: (760) 735-8 ,rr.vr ~vnn. 'J!.V,w.Jl,OJ.,C; 'bl SOIL REPORT ~ SPECIFICATION~ NDT APPROVED PLAN! APPROVED SHOP DRAWING /\KCHIIECf FOR WEEKENDING rROJECT, NO. Nadel 3022-A0I "'Gu•= REPORTNO. PG OF Hope Engineering I Er /'tll"\ll"\90 ONTRACTOR r.&JU-.F!LENO. rERMITNQ ~ Keeton Construction UB-CON'JMCTOR PROJECT NAME WCI Inc. Emerald Lake Ce:,eP c.-rR .,.,PECI10N ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 1525 Faraday, Carlsbad, Ca Same REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTION MANUAUMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MI'RS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL our AND ATIACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS ORA PREVIOUS INSPECD I~ CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. vo=ui N,' ,w ............. ...,_ ............ ,,: CONIRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED; """"'-GRIDLINES,PIECF.'!OBSER,=: See Attached Field Report ~TRU~,v=NOTES.DETAIL, OR:RFIS USED: =,INCLUDING MEETINGS: REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: !WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: TEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START 7:00A.M. SITE TIME FINISH 3:00P.M. J·~ .DA~-,..,,_ !LUNCH PERIOD TRAVEL TIME VERIFIEDB . , .--• .- /I .. ~ This is to certify that the above reported inspections were made in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the rules and re~ons of the Department of Ge 4< Services (Title 24). I certify under penalty of perjury that I know the contents of these reports and that all of the above statements are1rue. 15-Feb-2002 AWS CWI #011215.71 Signature ==:::::: Date ofReport AWS I ICBO Certification Number Mike Langdale I ' PrintName City I County Certificatiort Number --------~ i I I ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022-A0I DATE 2/15/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X --EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Panametrics Epoch ill Model 2300; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkamer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00 DIA; 70 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 0.75 x 0.75 CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIWBlock ACCEPTANCE&REJECTIONCRITERIA 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER Hope Engineering FLR , ·' LOCJP.C# ' " ",. , '' · ·'. .·· .: , ,: l;)ESCRIPTION ·, ; :-, ·-.. ,.:ACC REJ . . · .. ,RE.MARKS . ,· ,,· 0 ',.' .... · ... Calibrated Panametrics Epoch III In Accordance With AWS DI. I Section 6, Part F. I) Performed UT on Beam to Column CJP Connection Serpentine Wall Elevation. Testet¼ conducted on floors 2, 3 and Rooflevel. 18 connections tested, 2 welds per connection. 36 welds ok, all UT OK. 2) CJP Beam to Column Moment Connections. Bottom Flange only. Gridlines as follows: R F-17.4 S I 0 UTOK R F.5-17.2 N I 0 UTOK R F.5-17.2 S 1 0 UTOK R G-17N 1 0 UTOK R G-15E 1 0 UTOK R G-14W 1 0 UTOK R G-14E 1 0 UTOK R G-13W 1 0 UTOK R G-13E 1 0 UTOK R G-12W 1 0 UTOK R G-llN 1 0 UTOK R F.4-11 S 1 0 UTOK R F.4-11 N 1 0 UTOK R E.7-11 S 1 0 UTOK Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: Total No. of Welds Rejected: T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. .= column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 COl'fl1NUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2_ OF 2- I HEREBY CERTIFY lHAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO 1HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF lliE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG.HOURS O.T.HOURS SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SE CTI OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. 7:00AM. 3:00P.M. 8 Mike Langdale! All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II Approved By See Cover Sheet ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022-A0I DATE 2/15/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD x EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Panametrics Epoch III Model 2300; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkamer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00 DIA; 70 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 0.75 x 0.75 CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS D 1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE& REJECTION CRITERIA 1998 AWS DI.I, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL -------------REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER Hope Engineering . ·. ACC REJ' . :---.. -,-:· __ REM.~.RKS_":.···:_._ ...... _ .. Calibrated Panametrics Epoch ill In Accordance With AWS Dl.l Section 6, Part F. Cont'd R E-11 S 1 0 UTOK R B.5-1 N 1 0 UTOK R B-1 S 1 0 UTOK R B-lN 1 0 UTOK R A-1 S 1 0 UTOK R A-2W I 0 UTOK R A-3E 1 0 UTOK R A-3W 1 0 UTOK R A--4E I 0 UTOK R A-4W 1 0 UTOK R A-SE 1 0 UTOK R A-7S 1 0 UTOK R A.6-6.8N 1 0 UTOK R A.6-6.8 S 1 0 UTOK R B.3-6.6N I 0 UTOK Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 210 Total No. of Welds Rejected: o T = Top; H::: Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY TI-IAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO rnE BEST OF M'f KNOWLEDGE ALL OF rnE ABOVE REPORTED WORK lAIILESS OillERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND mis WORK TO COMPL y WITH THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. Mike Langdale/ UT/MT/PT ASNf LEVEL II @ CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGEJ_oF_.:5:_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG.HOURS O.T.HOURS 7:00A.M. 3:00P.M. 8 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour wtll be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By See Cover Sheet MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022-A0 I DATE 15-Feb-02 ------ LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD x EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Parker Research Contour Probe/DA-200 Serial No. 8537 PARTICLE MFG Magnaflux ---------- METHOD OF INSPECTION 0 DRY D WET 0 RESIDUAL D CONTINUOUS 0 AC D PULSED oc CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 ASTM E709, Section 12, 20, Table 3 ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA 1998 AWS D 1.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 MATERIAL -------------REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER Hope Eng. _______ _.___-=------- FlR LQC/PC#-' -.. , . _, .. _._ :·'. :· ·.: ··,:·. :-::. DESCRIPTlON: ',, :-.:-: ,,_ -! 1! ' ACC ~EJ , .. ·REMARKS : .:. ' . ·., I '. Performed Magnetic Particle Inspection on Beam to Column CJPMoment Connections, Bottom Flanges Only. R F-17.4 S 1 0 MTOK R F.5-17.2 N 1 0 MTOK R F.5-17.2 S 1 0 MTOK R G-17N 1 0 MTOK R G-lSE 1 0 MTOK R G-14W 1 0 MTOK R G-14E 1 0 MTOK R G-13E 1 0 MTOK R G-13W 1 0 MTOK R G-12W 1 0 MTOK R G-llN 1 0 MTOK R F.4-11 S 1 0 MTOK R F.4-11 N 1 0 MTOK R E.7-11 S 1 0 MTOK R E.7-11 N 1 0 MTOK R E-11 S I 0 MTOK R B.5-1 N 1 0 MTOK R B-1 S I 0 MTOK R B-1 N I 0 MTOK R A-1 S 1 0 MTOK R A-2W 1 0 MTOK R A-3E 1 0 MTOK Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: Total No. of Welds Rejected: T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; sti£ = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE A\. -PAGE_:z!f.. OF -2:..£ I HEREBY CERTIFY 1!-IAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO lHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF lHE ABOVE.REPORTED WORK UNLESS OlHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUIID THlS WORK TO COMPLY WITH lHE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF lHE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG.HOURS O.T.HOURS 7:00AM. 3:00P.M. 8 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour ·-- Mike Langdale/ minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED IN hour minimum. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVELil Approved By :5££, (;,/l_t1~/1. .S11.($.£/ MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING.REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022-A0l DATE 15-Feb-02 ------ LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD x EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Parker Research Contour Probe/DA-200 Serial No. 8537 PARTICLE MFG Magnaflux -----=------METHOD OF INSPECTION 0 DRY OWET @RESIDUAL D CONTINUOUS @AC D PULSED oc CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 ASTM E709, Section 12, 20, Table 3 ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIA 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Table 6.1 MATERIAL -------------REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER Hope Eng. ---------=---=------- FLR' -'LOC/PCff . "· ... ',:.=::···._'·'"' ''":'-_-": :t:··>--OE$CRJPTlON. ·:,·.;, '.,.· ·, ' -' .. :: . .. '.. .. ACC .Rf=J ··, · r, REMARKS'·, .. ··.· ·>· • "1 ",• I: I. Performed Magnetic Particle Inspection on Beam to Column CJPMoment Connections, Bottom Flanges Only. R A.3W 1 0 MTOK R A-4E I 0 MTOK R A-4W 1 0 MTOK R A-SE 1 0 MTOK R A-7S 1 0 MTOK R A6-6.8N 1 0 MTOK R A.6-6.8 S 1 0 MTOK R B-3-6.6N I 0 MTOK Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 30 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE I HEREBY CERTIFY lHAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO lHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE All OF lHE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OlHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND lHIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH lHE APPROVED PLANS, TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS ~,a~TI---«~~m,-~"'"""~ Mike Langdale/ SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED INS 7:00AM. 3:00P.M. 8 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II Approved By ~£&_ ~all,.,. '::5.li.~&."r Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 FIELD REPORT fxr.CO.t' wusu. AY.tUL.,ti.Dl,.,C: H SOIL REPORl ... , ... H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN. . APPROVED SHOP DRAWING ,u,,.Cl-llTECT FOR WEEKENDING PROJECT. NO. 15-Feb-2002 ... ~a.oi2Ao1 >NOINEER REPOn.J. .i.,O. PO OF 1 2 ONl'RACTOR PLAN FILE NO. PERMIT NO. C5-Dlo9o ~UB-CONI'RACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake ~eR ~ "'SPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PRO,=• 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca l 525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca ~PORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBOFIEID JNSPECflONMANUAIJMTGSOil.MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF TIIERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT TIIEEND OF TIIE WORKDAY, ORMISSJNG MTRS AND RFJS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON TIIE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. •v=uJ>I nv, "" --' --·----,: ONl'RACTORS EQUIPMENT 1 MI\NrOWER USED: ru<"", GRID u=,Pu,CES OBSERVED: STRUC1URALNOTES,DETA!L,OR=10USED: ~.INCLUDING MEETINfiS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER,: SAMPLES TAKEN: --TURE: ' TESTS REQUIRED: ' ~JU-!-SITE TIME START 7:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 3:00PM !LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 VERIFIED ,AZ, I r I .V I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies With soil mvesttgation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, /"J41. specifications and applicable section of the Building Codes, unless otherwise noted on the deficiency report. /44_ L_ 14-Feb-2002 ASNT 75114 Signature Date of Report AWS / ICBO Certification Number Adam James Print Name City I County Certification"Number ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A01 DATE 2/14/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 A ws D 1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL steel REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER ffi);l~ ; ;JUOCWC#.( ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=,00$,H~IP:llON''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' lAO~J HRlEJl .-.·-····················ReMABKS ... -..... -.-... -......... Ultrasonic testing was performed on rooflevel moment and non-moment frame connections. The following results and locations are all CJP welds. R D/5.3 Top flange and web UTOK, E 2 0 R D/4.2 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 0 R D/3 Top flange and web UTOK, N 2 0 R D.4/3 Top flange and web UTOK, S 2 0 R F/14 Top flange and web UTOK, N 2 0 R E/14 Top flange and web UTOK, E 2 0 R E/13 Top flange and web UTOK, W 2 0 R E/1.4 Top flange and web UTOK, S 2 0 R E.7/1.4 Top flange and web UTOK, N/S 4 0 R F.4/1.4 Top flange and web UTOK, N/S 4 0 R G/11 Top flange UTOK, W, Top flange and web UTOK, N 3 0 R G/12 Top flange and web UTOK, W 2 0 R G/13 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 0 R G/14 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 0 R G/15 Top flange and web UTOK, E 2 0 R G/17 Top flange and web UTOK, N 2 0 R F.5/17.2 Top flange and web UTOK, N/S 4 0 R F/17.4 Top flange and web UTOK, S 2 0 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 49 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE 2 OF 2 I HEREBYCERTIFYlHAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI.EOGEALL OF THE ABOVE REPORlED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T.HOURS SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SE NS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. 7:00AM 3:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR 8 hour minimum. UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVELII Approved By SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. Project Supenntendent Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 ~iwVl' nvn,n, Ultrasonic Testing rU<CHITECT ONGJNEER ONTRACTOR SUB-CONTRACTOR lNSPECTION ADDRESS 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT I AJ.LAt!lli: Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 H SOIL REPORl APPROVED PLAN H SPEOFICATION! APPROVED SHOP DRAWING FOR WEEK=,ulNG rROJECT. NO. 15-Feb-2002 3022A01 REPORTNO. PG OF 1 2 PLANr=NO. rERMITNO.CA-Dib9D PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake <!:o"_J) C5\R ADDRESS OF PROJECT 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBOFIELD INSPECTIONMANUAIJMTG SOIL MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FllL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS l!NSPECTOR$, IS CORRECTED, SO NO1'E'ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUB:MIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. •vu=>JH .. v. '" : Om=CTORS EQUIPMENT /MANPOWER USED: """"-GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: 1RUCTURAL NO1ES,DETAil., ORRFIS v=v. ~.INCUJDINGMEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK.AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: !WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: ifEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START 7:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 3:00PM VERIFIBDBYtJ~S) Ad,q~ LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 I I - I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies with soil investigation recommendations, and / or the approved plans, 4 specifications and applicable section of the Building Codes, unless otherwise noted on the deficiency report. a ~-----13-Feb-2002 ASNT 75114 Signature Date of Report A WS / ICBO Certification Nwnber Adam.James Print Name City I CoWJty Certification Nwnber ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A01 DATE 2/13/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0. 75" x 0. 75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJl 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL steel REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER ---------------- fililR ?tOiP/00.#.\ rnmrmmmrrnmrrrnrrrrrrnoescRrntnONm-m-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrmr 1AC~l iRE.J l·l·\·\-H-l-l·l·H~-:EfiMARK$\·l·!-l·l·\·l-l-l·l·l Ultrasonic testing was performed on roof level moment and non-moment frame connections. The following results and locations are all CJP welds. R B.7/6.6 Top flange UTOK, S 1 R. A.6/6.8 Top flange and web UTOK, N/S 4 R A/7 Top flange and web UTOK, S, Top flange UTOK, N 3 R A/5 Top flange and web UTOK, E 2 R A/4 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 R A/3 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 R A/2 Top flange and web UTOK, W 2 R All Top flange UTOK, E, Top flange and web UTOK, S 3 R Bil Top flange and web UTOK, N/S 4 R B.5/1 Top flange and web UTOK, N 2 R C/1 Top flange UTOK, E 1 R B/3 Top flange and web UTOK, S 2 R C/3 Top flange and web UTOK, N 2 R C/4.2 Top flange and web UTOK, E/W 4 R C/5.3 Top flange and web UTOK, E 2 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 40 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest -· CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_z_QF_z_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI..EDGE All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPI.Y WlTH THE APPROVED Pl.ANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND_ APPLICABLE EC ONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T.HOURS 7:00AM 3:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR 8 hour minimum. , UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II Approved By SPECIALTY -AGENCY NO. Project Superintendent Corporate Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 MONTANA Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 FIELD REPORT rr::.vr .. ...,~...n. H SOIL REPORl H SPECIFICATION! Ultrasonic and Magnetic Particle Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING IU<CHllECT FOR wc=ENDING rRO,=,.r<O. 15-Feb-2002 3022A01 c.i.~GINEER. REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 ONTRACTOR PLANF!WNO. rERMITNO ,p.,-DlD9o SUB-CONTRACTOR PROJECTNAME Emerald Lake ~ ~ INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBOFIEI.D INSPECTIONMANUAUMTG SOil,MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS lF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT TIIB END OF 1HE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH ADEFICJENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS l!NSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON TIIB ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS . •uo='l>X . NU. UK ••• ··---·-• =vn•~,: ~ONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT, •=~OWER USED: r"""'-GRID LINES,PJECES OBSERVED: STRu,c1uKAL NOrn,,u.,uuL, OR=» USED: ,==,INCLUDING MEETINGS: See attached field report, nothing further. REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: IIBMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: . VFJUFJED B.,,J~,JAL, -~ SITE TIME START 8:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 4:00PM ... UNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 /I ...... _,., ,v I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies with soil mvestigation recommendations, and/ or the approved plans, specifications and applicable section of the Building Codes, unless otherwise noted on the deficiency report. u ~----.. 12-Feb-2002 ASNT75114 Signature Date of Report A WS / ICBO Certification Number Adam.James Print Name City/ County Certification Number ULTRASONIC and Mag. Particle TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A01 DATE 2/12/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X . EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USN50; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERl.t 1998 AWS Dl.l, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL steel REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER ----------------- f:llF:f ,!,!!ijQCJ.RC#./ -1-+H-+H-H-H-H-1-1-1-H-i-++Hoosea1e11001-m-trrrrrrrrrrrrrnrmrwr A®l JEJ :::::::'.:::::::::::::::::ReMA~s:::::::::::::::::::::::=: Ultrasonic testing was performed on third floor moment repairs @A/4 West and A/3 East. Magnetic particle testing was completed on all overhead fillet welds @ moment frames. The third floor has been accepted in its entirety using both methods ofNDT. 3 ALL UT/MTOK ALL 0 Note anv welds reoaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: ALL Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; fig. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE :TJONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING lAWS. a (r-r-::;;.~ ECTOR UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-OF-2- TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 8:00AM 4:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Corporate Office 2992 'E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 m,vr nv,= ;n.Y~: H SOIL REPORl H SPEOFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING I\KCHITECT FOR WEEK ENDING rROJECT. NO. 8-Feb-2002 3022A01 ONG!NEER REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 "'vn,.nnCTOR PLAN FILE NO. rERMffNO. ce:,-O\o9b ~UB-CONTRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake Copp G--rtL LNSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJE<;I 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca [REPORT REQUJREMENTS: ICBO FIELD INSPECTIONMANUALJMTG SOil.MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF THERE IS NON- CONFORMING WORK AT TIIB END OF TIIB WORK-DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., Fll.L OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, IS CORRECTED, SO NOTE ON TIIB ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S ~RTS. ,vo~u, ·---NV. . -----------~= ONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT/ MANPOWER USED: """"'GRID LINES,PJECESOBSERYED: ~TRU,.,1u1<JU.NOTES,DETAIL,ORRFISUSED: =•=,lNCLUDINGMEETINw: See attached field report, nothing further. IREWORKASPERCENTOF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: WEATHER: SAMPLES TAKEN: ir.EMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START 9:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 5:00PM VERIFIED BY J ;_A_.,.~ .j L ;. -~ b LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 I , I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies with soil investigation recommendations, and/ or the approved plans, a {I"" m,d ,pplio,hloS<ciioo °'"" Buildmg"""', """"-ooredoo11re-report : ----7-Feb-2002 ASNT 75114 Signature Date ofReport AWS / ICBO Certification Number Adam.James PrintName City/ County Certification Number ----~ I ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ---- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A01 DATE 2/7/2002 ----------------------LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USNS0; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 A ws D1.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IlW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 A ws Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL steel REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER ---------------- ffililR . .l.llOCJ®.#.ll. U.U.1.1.l.1.LW.JWH?HfW?WflOOSQRlfftlOtfHWH?H/Hfl?ttH?Hf1t A6¢l :fffiJ rnrmrnrtt!REMARKS?ttf ·1·1·1·1·1 Ultrasonic testing was performed on third floor moment and non-moment frame connections. The following results and locations are all CJP welds. 3 B.5/1 T/B flanges and web UTOK, N 3 3 C/1 T/B flanges UTOK, W 2 3 C/3.5 T/B flanges UTOK, N/S 4 3 B/3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, S 3 3 C/3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, N/S 6 3 C/4.2 T/B flanges ·and web UTOK, E/W 6 3 C/5.3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, E 3 3 D/5.3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, E 3 3 D/4.2 T/B flanges and web UTOK, E/W 6 3 D/3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, N 3 3 D.4/3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, S 3 3 F/3 T/B flanges and web UTOK, N 3 3 E/1.4 T/B flanges and web UTOK, S 3 3 E/1.4 T/B flanges UTOK, W 2 3 E.7/1.4 T/B flanges and web UTOK, N/S 6 3 E/13 T/B flanges and web UTOK, W 3 3 E/14 T/B flanges and web UTOK, E 3 The following locations represent bottom flange moment welds that have been accepted. F .5/17 .2 N/S, F /17.4 D/17, A/4 W, B.3/6.6, A.6/6.8 N/S, A/7, A/5 10 Note anv·welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 72 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 0 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MYKNOWl.EDGEAU.OFTHEABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOlED. I HAVE FCUNO THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS~ SECTIONS THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE-2-0F-2- TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 9:00AM 5:00PM 8 0 Corporate Office 2992 '.E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 MONTANA Testing & Geotecbnical, Inc. FIELD REPORT Branch Office 904 Rancheros Drive, Suite L San Marcos, California 92069 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (760) 735-8979 .1P.cvr wvru,. ·n,.T~ ....... : H SOIL REPORl H SPECTFICATION! Ultrasonic Testing APPROVED PLAN APPROVED SHOP DRAWING ~CHITECT ;rOR WEEKENDING rROJECT. ,.0. 8-Feb-2002 3022A01 ONG!NEER REPORT NO. PG OF 1 2 CONlRACTOR r=H!Ll>NO. rERMIT "c:R -bl D q a SUB-CONlRACTOR PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake ~ r--r12_ LNSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJECT 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca e REPORT REQUIREMENTS: ICBOFIELD INSPECTIONMANUAUMTGSOil,MANUAL REVIEW PREVIOUS REPORTS AND LISTS IF TIIERE IS NON- fcONFORMING WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS AND RFIS, ETCS., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS iINSPECTOR:S, IS CO:RRECTED, SO NOTE ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOUR WEEK'S REPORTS. ''" J"<U. ---------, CONlRACTORS EQUIPMENT, MN<rvWER USED: -GRID LINES, PIECES OBSERVED: ~muc, V,VU. NOTES, DefAIL, OR Kl'IS USED: """""""',INCLUDING MEEI7NG~: See attached field report, nothing further. ·' !REWORK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY: PERCENT PROJECT COMPLETION: ~T.HER: SAMPLES TAKEN: ifEMPERATURE: TESTS REQUIRED: SITE TIME START 7:00AM SITE TIME FINISH 3:00PM VERlFIEDBYJ~~ QA_~-LUNCH PERIOD 0 TRAVEL TIME 0 -A./ /I ~ V I do certify that I have personally observed all the work listed above and that this work complies with soil investigation recommendations, and/ or the approved plans, /' / /) specifications and applicable section of the Building Codes, unless otherwise noted on the deficiency report. 4/4_ f:j---6-Feb-2002 ASNT75114 Signature Date of Report AWS / ICBO Certification Nmnber Adam.James Print Name City I County Certification Number ULTRASONIC TESTING REPORT REPORT NO. ----- PROJECT NAME Emerald Lake JOB NO. 3022A01 DATE 2/6/2002 LOCATION 1525 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, Ca SHOP FIELD X EQUIPMENT MFG/MODEL Krautkramer Brandson/USNS0; Digital A-Scan Display; Wide Band Frequency PROBE Krautkramer: 0 deg, 2.25 MHZ, 1.00" DIA; 70 deg, 60 deg, 45 deg 2.25 MHZ, 0.75" x 0.75" CALIBRATION & TECHNIQUE PROCEDURE 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6, Part F REFERENCE STD IIW Block ACCEPTANCE & REJECTION CRITERIJ! 1998 AWS Dl.1, Section 6.13, Table 6.2 MATERIAL steel REPRESENTING MTGL ENGINEER RM~: >WOC/.®.#.i:1 :1:1:1:1:1:::1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:::1:1:1:1:I:I:I:I::J)~$$RIP:llfflik:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:::1:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:::I:I: AC(t =:R.EJ: :·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:::·:::R.EMAR~S:::::::::::::·:·:·::::::: Ultrasonic testing was performed on third floor moment and non-moment frame connections. The following results and locations are all CJP welds. 3 F.5/17.2 T flange/Web UTOK, N/S 4 3 F/17.4 T flange/Web UTOK, S 2 3 D/17 T/B flanges UTOK, S 2 3 B.7/6.5 T/B flanges UTOK, N 2 3 B.3/6.6 T flange/Web UTOK, N 2 3 A.6/6.8 T flange/Web UTOK, N/S 4 3 A/7 T flange/Web UTOK, S 2 3 A/5 T flange/Web UTOK, E 2 3 A/4 West, T/B flange UTOK, Web reject slag inclusion 3/8" 2 1 depth class A 3 A/4 T/B flanges and Web UTOK, E 3 3 A/3 T/B flanges and Web UTOK, W 3 3 A/3 East, T/B flange UTOK, Web reject slag inclusion 1/2" 2 1 depth class A 3 A/2 T/B flanges and Web UTOK, W 3 3 All T/B flanges UTOK, W 2 3 All T/B flanges and Web UTOK, S 3 3 A.9/1 T/B flanges and Web UTOK, N/S 6 Note any welds repaired as REPAIR in Remarks column above COMMENTS: Total No. of Welds Accepted: 44 Total No. of Welds Rejected: 2 T = Top; B = Bottom; R = Roof; F = Foundation; CJP = Complete Joint Penetration; PJP = Partial Joint Penetration pl. = plate; col. = column; bm. = beam; flg. = flange; conn. = connection; cont. = continuity; stif. = stiffener N = North; S = South; E = East; W = West; SE= Southeast; SW= Southwest; NE= Northeast; NW= Northwest CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE/PRINT OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR UT/MT/PT ASNT LEVEL II SPECIALTY AGENCY NO. 0 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAGE_2_oF_2_ TIMEIN TIMEOUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS 7:00AM 3:00PM 8 0 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours -8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. J 03/04/2002 07:47 3103201383 CARSON TOWN CENTER PAGE 04/07 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A 'Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: ... _,.., 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centto, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.56:3.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760,482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT 'IYPI: OF WORK ~NSl'ECTOR D 11:CHNICMI AVAII.ABI.E: ~L IIEl'OAT (Y) (N) SPECS (V} (N) .5~~ APPROVED PLANS (NI .ll'PRova> SHOP DRAWIIIG~ ARCH11'£GT Nt}'t:>ti,l.-FOR WEEIC ENlllNG r~'i..-,2 -,4-c:>1 o, ()"l.--rJ'1.. ENGINEER H '?P, ' "' '6-~N4·· FIEPOI\T'NO. PG OF CONTRACfORJl_J!E,;j (Pt/ t:!x,.,.Js t ~ vd-1."'tJ Pl.AN FJLI; NO. lPEAMITNO, "iffl. 4/0li> 'I 0 SUB-CONTIIACTOR 1,v t.., ' PRO.IEOTN.WE e,r~~Uf o JA,K,& (f,-eJI') Gi\e INSPECTION ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROJe.eT s ; 15:25 FA OAOA-Y /'A~L,.$ &t-0 >At¥1/l. 'REPORTING ltF..QUIREMENTS: TCBO FJEl,D INSPECJJON MANUALIMTGt. SOJJ... MANUAL REVIBW P.REVIOUS REPORT~ AND LTS"J'S IF THF.RB TS NON-CONFORMINO WORKATTfffi END OFTJm WORKDAY, OR MISSJNG Ml'RS,AND RFJS. ETC., FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DEFICIENCY REPOR:I' WHEN A DEFICIENCY. YOURS OR A PRSVIOUS lNSPl'iCTOR'S, TS CORREC'l'BD, SO NO'l'E ON THE ~TCllJIIAL DEfJCIENCY RUPORT AND SUBMIT A COl>YWITHY(;)t)R WEEK'S RBPORI'S. MATEIUJJ,S USl:ll av OONmAC1'0A (INCLUIII; RESWICH ~PORT NO. OR MATERIAL TEST IIEf>OI\TS½ )' {;,. ... $71-Te· Cormw:'l'OflS EOUIPMEfff / MANf'OWijff US£tl: ~t1.'iit6L-.e. /W'JU,ot rl r.. u ...,l "~ I t!i. ~t.,ue,p:;> w £1.,,r::> GIZ.- fCftw W,£, Wrt,1~ &,t CIJ..c .s · AREA. GRID LINES, PIECES 08SER!it:D: G,,t,'fvli-:r.£ l3/1.Aflf t rl '1 ::t /!::.1 LU. r ~ ~ l-Ol /Ji:., o /_ 1)1 /l,_ f'_v;v' f ~ ~t,or1ec ,__, fl /J-/. 4' A-L.("Q <o 1111£.vtt ,,~ AJ ~/41 s-u nF.r~h... STAUCTURIIL NOTES, ~All., OR flFJ& IJ$E[i:5 0 A< 1/.r-Jr I ~,&,s~ 2~ i:,,. -· • I --., ... - lltMAIIKS, lltl.1.IIDl#O JIEE11I/IJI: Fyt-v ew o~,,..~. ~o µut1; : AkCJ 1c(£LD.J l}U... r fll-t.C... F,~r tlV 61-,<).S • ~~ U 1&G-D BEWOBK AS fEBCiENT OE ALL WOBK !ODAY: eEBCENT eBOJEQI COMeLEIIQ~il' WEATIIEII: TEMPERATURE; SITETIMl!ST,'RT:_ -2-1------- LUNClf PERIOD:------- SAMPI.ES TAKEN! TESTS flECUIREO: SITETIME flNISH:_3 ___ _ TRAVEL TIME:---·----- :,.,,{r /J.110 t=- I 00 CERTIFV THAT I HAVE PERSONALI.Y 08SERVEO ALL OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND / OR TH£ APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ArtO APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNL.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN TI¾E DEAC1Ef4CV REPORT . a-.--,-' 0 3 I~-I l O .,__ .,, 8 7 .2 JJl.t--8.r Slgm1lura Data of Report ICBO Cett/tl(;:!tlon Nurnber /1lr<JJ1ro J7Jl:#L! t-/,tJ.,Jl Priilt N;une City I count, Certtffcatton Numbt!r flev; 7NI ~03/06/2002 WED 12:18 FAX ,,, MTGL-ANAHEIM 141005/007 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suita A ' Anaheim, CA 92808 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. Stale Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537 .3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.6:32.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 DSA / OSHPD REPORT lYPf OF WORK O(JNSPECTOR O~QHNl()l\N AVAILABLE: SOIL REPORT M (N) SPECS~N} ,.SA.f-.wt APPROVED PLANSC@ (N) APPROVED SHOP DRAWING lYl (Nl ARCHITECT FOR WFFK FNDltlG 9 I PROJ.ECT. NO. A-. ~ z -2-. -c-z_ "!:,o-2. '2.. 0 ENCIN~ER REPORT NO. PG l Of ( , iJA,°hL/ CONTIIACTOII Pl.AN FllE NO, IPERMITNl)"C/3 ~ 0 ID qD SUD-CONTRACTOR l'llOJtCI NAME b L~1 (' /'>Rf) C.:(k ... J;; M e_Jt_ RC-. rmiPECTION ADO!l~SS A00AiSS Of PROJECT I l,'.J:c.S" ~11'1_/ )..Jll, 1 A.W-.. C!.-~Al> ~~ REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: ICBO EELD INSl'ECTION MANUAUMTGL SOIL, MANUAL. REVIEW !'khVIOUS JUiPOR1'S AND LISTS 11:<THblH: JS NON-CONFORMING WORK }ff Tllti llND OFTHEWORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFlS, ETC .• FII.J.. OUT AND ATIACHA DEFICIENCY REl'l'.>IH WHF.N /1. DEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A PRllVIOUS JNSPECTOR. 'S, IS CURRECTED. SO NOTF. ON Tim OR1GJNAL lJhMt:(l(N(.'Y REPORT AND SUBM1l' A COPY Wlnl YOUR WEEK'S RHl'IJRTS. MATERIALS USED BY CONTRACTOR (INCLl/OE RESEARCH REPORT NO. DR MATERIAL TEST R~: _ ~~/tr; /..e. ~ tuJt:J .a7 CONTRACTOIIS EQUIPMENT/ MI\NPOWEA USED: AREA, GRID LINE$, PIECES Oa!lERI/ED: /1_ /4,/ J,n,/ ~ t!::J,s SJ6-S.~U. ~h c'q~e,ef. ~1¥f? . ft~ .. ~-•o }LS _s/,,~ A-C ,.oz._. STRUCTIJRAL NOTF.S. DETAIL. oo AFIS USED: /::J L O c, I REMARr<S, INQ.IJD/ltfi lfflfTftmll; • -r::-__tJ /A)'~ j\ IJ --S tr6-~.L,,_ Iii uJ.. a:/-s:t:,o~I k_~~J.. -J.~ I S..AfC..lM./ ... s:--ii.o ./ t-S. e-1~ ~~ ~ ~ I# .4 /.; Jfl,L/_ ._s RFWnRK A~ t"l"t'i _,.;7 ni: Al I wna1t Tnn.tiV• PERCENT oonJECT r.nMPI ETION· WE.tTHER· {J ~ U-~f-SJ\MPLES TAKEN· .,(JO TEMPERATURE! Ce' t, TESTS RoOUIRED:,(} l) SITE TIME START: tj__/06 .. _.. .... SllE TIME FINISH: • /.0!:fO J~JJ JL .-~ ~-lUNCH PERIOD: ........ TRAVEL TIME: VERIFIED BY· • -A . • • •• I •· r -:/ reported inspsctions were malfe in ~cordance with tne approved plans an!I spsclflcatlons and lfle rules and regulations of the r2u~n-P:~1tle 24). I certify under penaltY ol perfury [hat I know lhe contents of th8Sf} reports ai\11 that all of the above statements are true. J_ I .1_S?j I O z._ 1onature Dale ar RGPQrt ICBO CertificptiQn Number (( .. ~rd~~ l2fL l'rfntName Ciry / County Cett!cat1on Number ~v-7197 " 03/04/2002 07:47 3103201383 CARSON TOWN CENTER PAGE 05/07 Corporate: , 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G san Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tai: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.8999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.682.2974 Fax: 858,537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax.: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT lYPE Of WOR1( ~ INSl'EC'rol\ OTECHHICAN AVAILA81.E: SOIL flliPORT lYl (N) SPECS M<NJ f f',t.n,.,. f-.. rtJJ-\,. S 'rl'f,,t,,L, 'lv'lvt,,D '"'" APP!IOVED PLANS .D't'lm . APPROVEO SHOP DRAwtNG.JdiNI ARCHITECT NfrD£.L. FM WEEK ENDIN8 (J '.\_c)')..J )_.. I PROJECT. NO. J 3' () '2-l.. ... /1--d ENGINl:EI\ J-1-op I£ £,N~. AEPORTNO. PG Df CONTMCTQR k, ~ (.prJ,S trz.,·c...th .... ~ . PI.Al,IFILENO. fc6olzJJ1V SUIJ,COflTAACTOR P--~~~;;;:. NC.\ Pl'IOJECTNAM);jt1 £~ LA-~€. f~ C-«? INSPECTIO!f ADOIIESS ADDR~SS Of PROJECT f l t;J..5 ~A-ftl\-0.Jt-7 CAtt.L& M-o 5A,Mtt IU:!l'ORTING nRQU1REl\.:mNTS: ICBO riELD INS~r-cTION MANUAUMTGL $OIL. MANUAL R£VJEW PRh'VTOUS REPORTS ANP f..JSTS IF 'J'JffiRB IS NON.CONFORMING WORK A"(' THB END OF 'fHB WORJc; DAY, OR MIS.~lNG MrnS. AND Rl'IS, F./TC., FILL OUT AND /1.TTACHA DcFICJENCY REPORI' WHEN II OEFICIENCY, YOURS OR A f'REVJOUS ll'ISPECTOR'S, IS CORRBCTED, SO NO'l'B ON 'Tlffi ORIGJNAT, PISFICIBNCY R.El'OKT AND SUBMIT A COPY wmlYOUR Wr.EK'S REPOR'JS. MA1'£fllALS USED UY CONTRACTOR (lr,llllUDE l!ESWICH f\EPORr NO. on MATERIAL resr nePOJUS)! e-1/ .... -ra. -.4) 6 . H-\.5.t 1s1-.S.t~ l!kJl.:b. A-~ - CONTRACfOIIS EQIJIPl,IENT f MANPOWeR USED: l (Pt..(,+C...\ f'l£0 W£iou; pO'(lfrttJ1r 1$. W£l,/;,1tJ~ E._4 Ii\ f ,-,, tl.r-1 ~ " F(A-v,J 'tr! /U.,D l Al l,R ffJg(c,JJ. AREA, lll\lD llN~. PIECES OBS!ill~O: ( + /-0~ l/.lc/1£ FIUD WWr!.~ ... E&!.t!J.1~ Ju~ ~9'.Ul!!J.. ,Al..otj~. 1,·4: l..-l t-!_ !£ Q G,.-1 f.vJl, W ,d::l.....t... _ti \t.,t \A-_{ tte g_,.i 4 fN J(f)l,:r~ A ~ ':J.S- &TRUCTUl!Al NOlES, DeTAll., OA RAS USftt: 5 ;\~4, -ttj~ .. \ REMARKS, mctUDllfB "1lElllH1S: BS I) :/i-~Ve-.D Ti!JZ w~~ AT Ttl-£. lr/5t1YJi. lt'J4r1\()·,,J . ~-;::wnnl\ A~ DE~CENT nF Al I. WORll TOnt.v, ..., ..... , ,r,JT PROJECT r.nMPI_ETION: WEA'lltEI\: c1.u,...,-SAMPI.ES TAKEN: -Q TEMPERATURE: 7o lESTS 118lll1REO: SITI;TIME START:~----- ' ,,:,o srre TIME FINISH: -,,....,,.'L'---=..;,__. __ LUNCH PERIOD: ? 0 _.....,__ ;, mva TIMI:: _______ _ I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED All. OF THE WORK LISTEO ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. '"" I OR THE AP~~FICATIONS, ANO APPUCABLE SECTIOII OF THE BUii.DiNG COil~ UNLESS OTHERWISE NlllBJ IN THE DEACIENCY REPORT L -----0,., 1.-8 I C "2, tJ8 72-15~-9£ ---S-lg-na"'"tum--DalO of Report ICBO Canfflcatlon Numbef btl2W&D PrintNMl!e Rev: 7/'fl · 03/04/2002 07: 47 3103201383 CARSON TOWN CENTER PAGE 06/07 Corporate~ 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: ...__..,.,,. 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIEL.D REPORT TVPEDFwoR]( ~INSPECTOR Cl Tffi!NM;AN AV.AU.ABLE: SOIL REPOI\T (Y) (N) ,:; s ""' . APPRO\IEO P\.AN~N) MICHITECT FOR WE3E!i01NB J.lhD~'-0 -t>k-d 'J.. l;NGINl:ER HoPe F~. Rl:POFITNO. COHTIIACTOR KaTtJiJ GirJ5t,ev0-\itrl PLAtf FILE HO. stJB-CO!llAACTOR t,JC J PI\MCTNAME/f/nNMP INSPEtllON ADOflESS ADDRESS Of PROJECT SAm/J.. l<;;.l S PAPA-DA'I C/lt<l6&4.D PG Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPECS (V)(N) APPAQVl;D SHOP DRAWING (VJ (NJ ll'MIECT. NO. ,4-} ~lJ'l,,),-~ Of l~a,ot ffJ 1-,'Jkli. ('.---u, C;:(R I klWORTJNG REQUIREMENTS: lCBO t:lELD INSPF.Cl'ION MANUALIMTGL son .. MANUAL REV/fiW PREVIOU~ REPORTS AND US'.t'S JFiHERP. IS NOl'l-CONFORM1NO WORK AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY, OR MISSING MTRS, /\ND RFIS, !Jl'C~ FILL OUT AND ATTACH A DBFJCTF.JIICY REPORf WHEN A DEFICIENCY. YOURS OR A l'REVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, fS CORRF..c:n;D, SO NOTfi ON THE ORIGINAL DEFICIENCY Rm:'9RT ANO SUBMU .A COJ>YwmJ YOUR WEEK'$ REPORI'S. MAli!IIALS USfll BY CONTMCTM (INCLUP~ RESEARCH RePOIIT NO, OR MATERIAL TEST REPORT$)! Jf, A-J & -7/-Tg. CONTRACTORS EOOIPMM / MANPOWER useo;' . Q wt L,1,F1t::.D • -·-1 1>£rt,.S _ Po1JTA'~1.4 W,IU,l)J«'r G&ch/J~f-, FCA""' 11V Ub J tJ 4 p~qYl:_f J. All!!A. GRID l1N5, Pl EC6S OBS~fl\/eD! iJ'i Cc.ti ltvl.h~ FttA-Mi~ e. 11 ~r ft,L.£.UJ t"' c., S. vrJ $f:1!:.U,,N lt/111" t..r J.,, I,., ft'. I. L..> & L1/tlf, ~ . STRUCTIJIW. NtmS, DfTM.. OR RFIS usa:,; ~ "'.l L. -II A<. ' -'f)f e I -}'rA<.. I ll™ARKS. /ltCLl/0,lfQ llltET1tm: D,#9/ttl.,V/J,C> Trl-6-~,tit!.. (tJ T111t-lr~~Vll ~(.t.,.J • BEWOBK AS e£BCENI QE ALL WQBK IQQA't fEBQEl'il fBQJECl QQME!LEIIQN; MATH~; ~ ~ •O TEMPEflATURf! 7F SITE TIME STAf\T; __ 7~··-~ LUNCH PfRIOO: l e, ----'- S/IMPl.£S TIIICeN: TESTS R~OUIREO; SITHIME FINISH: '3 /.Ji:) TRAVEL TIME: ________ _ I 00 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONAI..LY OBSERVED ALL OF THE WOJlK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAT THIS WORK COMPLIES Wmt THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS. ANO/ OFI THE APPROVEO PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS ANO APPLICABLE SECTION OF TH£; BUILDING CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT /~ · · o-;. ,:i7, tJ"l-0e?:zif't-fJ Signature Dam of Report ICBO Cenfflelltkin Number EM u.1>-o T4:L$.t, fJ'tf+J } Print N.wne Clly I Coul!IY Certlflcallo11 Number fle'l:7/97 • 03/04/2002 07: 47 3103201383 CARSON TOWN CENTER PAGE 03/07 Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma AV8., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Tel: 714.632.2999 Tel: 858.537.3999 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Fax: 714.632.2974 Fax: 858.537.3990 Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 FIELD REPORT ;\lNSl'ECTOfl D ll:CHN!CAN Co,Jc.AJ$r£ AVAltAlll.E: s,-REPORT (YJ lNl APPR01/Eb PWG.!ll!"1'i SPECS M!Nl APPllOVBl SHOP PRAWlkG (Y) 00 PROJECT, NO. A _ 1 .~"2.,..-2--r"TQ Of Pl.Ml FILE NO, , CiYl, AOOflESS OF PROJl:CT /' Q/;JM/E REP0Jt1.ING REQUCRRMENTS: ICBO Y..1BLD INSPEC110N MANUAU'MTGL SOIL. MANUAi,, RJ3'\IJEW PREVIOUS REPORTS ANO LISTS Ir 'l'HBRE JS NON-CONFOR.Mll'1'G WORK AT TifE END O~Tf-16 WORK DNt', OR MISSlNO MTRS, AND RFIS. BTC .• FILL OUT AND A'TTACH A DEFICIENCY REPORI' WREN A DEFICIBNCV. YOURS OR A l'REVIOUS 1NSPEC;['08.'S, TS CORRECTTiD, SO Norn ON THE (ml(ll!lfAL DEFICIENCY REp()IU AND SUBMIT A COPY Wl1'H YOUR WE'SlC'S REPORTS, AAEA. GRID LINES, Pl1'CES OIISERVEO: G a-,J C,Jl,lfl S1'11UCTURAL NOTES, DET'41'1., OR AF1S USEli: s 7.3 ... .BEWQBK AS PERCENT OF ALL WORK TODAY; WEATtlER: Clt:z._,,.., PER.CENT PBD.JEQT COMPLEJ)ON· _ feST!l REDUIIIED: SfJc flME START:-.:,___ ---· J __ .. ,;; SITE'flME FINISH:-=-=""~'-----~---.. LUNCH PERIOD! _J·,. .............., -TRAVEL TIME:----·--- I DO CEATIP< THAT J HAVE PEASONALLY OBSERVeO ALL Of nli; WORK USTEO ABOVE AND lllAT THIS WORK COMPLIES WITH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS, AND / OR iHE APPROVED PLA~S, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE BUILDING CODE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN TIIE DEFICIENCY REPORT ~ . ~ 1?-b, o:z.. tJB7~1A-a-, Slgnahlra Date Qf Report JC80 CertfflCatlo11 Num!Mlr h1Rt/tl-o :m:1.-45 <e;UJ,v J Print ~~ Cltf I County Cenlflartlon Number Rev: 7/97 ..... ---...... Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Catroll Road, Suite G $an Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 FIELD REPORT lYPE Of WORK • P INSPECTOII CJ lECHNICAN AVAILABLE: ~ REPORT M (N) I),; Jt.1 ~,. 6-i ~ ~,J(' dl!,rt)r APPROVED PLAliS ) A!'lCHITaJT ~ P£ L FOO weac ENDING 6,} -'Dl.--6'2- ENGINE~R J.Jof?I--~~-Rl;POflT NO, COrffRACrOA J!..££1.lrJ,J (g,.tj (t')wut• ~ PI.ANFILENO, SUB-CONTRACTOR/? i (!. ~ \$ \4)-:l u, N~Tt:. PP.OJB:rNAME_r/Vlerl l,A-o INS1'£CTIDNADOR~ Jc;1c; , At', CA/tl& 6,4,0 AODRESS OF J'IIOJ~ S.AM £ IUJ:l'OmNG REQUUlEMENTS: lCBO ~ JNSP.BCTION MANUALJMTQ. SOIL. MANUAL PG Branch; 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free; 877.563.TEST Tai: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0SS0 / Sf>ECS_IP) (N) APl'RCIV£D SHOP DR.\WING M (NI r;E~M, OF ll'l:~1 i'JJ1D '411<..E. (!.l")R .r'I C1R. ' · R13VISW PR6VJOUS REPORl'S AND LISTS IF TH..1£RE IS NON-CONFORMING WORK Xl' THE ENO OF THI:! WORK PA'l, OR MJSSJNO lvl'l'a.8, A,.NP !U<IS, ETC .• ml. OU'l" AND ATl:ACHA DlWlCIE;NCY Af!PORT WHEN A DEPICIENCY, You as OR A P.IIBVlOUS INSPECTOR'S. JS CORREC"1'£D. so NOTE ON 1'.l:IB ORlOINAL D5.F!ClENCY Rlil'Olrr AND SUB.Ml'!' A COPY WITH YOUR WEl>K' S REPOaTS. MATI:fllAI.S USED BY COttlTIWl'!Ut (INCLUDE RESEARCH REPDHT NO. DR IMWU.•L TES1 tml'O!l'ISJ: . ~ ,4.ff /11 ' ,A)d' 4 68 ;, Wlf<~ /lrli:S/f· L:r ~t U.~~~~ ~ 1 Jo D£21~.,.1 ~ Z6S' 3S ·t/0 . COliTIIACTORS EQUIPMENT/ AWiPOWl:fl SEO: -...-e. ~ '111.Jw1 /? CM' -·1-& ~ > C =s<J~"il /?51 ~PlloJ_ -.3~ ~.3 AREA, .GRID LINES, Pl~CES OIISERVSI: Ci ~ (J-,JCtl PlA-c£ M£r!T Ft1~ 2f'"O Flnr,,a. De&{(.,• Si!IUCTI,IRAI. ml~ DEl'All, Oil RFI~ USEIJ; s ~A$.-1 ¼r.:i -B,tJ.~ .. : ;J. '2, -- REMARKS, IJlr:tUlNIIS J/IEE11llli$: r/$_$j l) :itii~P 7H£ &-rJ Ud't. ,t7l Ne~.Jt"T A-Tm£ A,t$N'£ -louf'1~ REWOF!K AR. -1 OF Al I WORK TOnAY· 1-'I-H[:J.Nf PROJECT COMP! l=Tllll\l• Wt.ATHER: fvr4 . SMIPlES 'TAKat JI l "'3' p-J,;,I) ~ tf/'(IIC..r. TtMl'EflA'TIJRE: 700' --r TES'T$ f\J;QIJIRED: SITE TIPIE STAAT;_·7-..,. _____ _ SITEnMEFINISH:_3 ___ _ LUNCH PERIOO; -------TRAVEi. TIME:~,-------- I DO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PERSONALiY 08$1:RVEO All OF THE WORK LISTED ABOVE ANO THAl THIS WORK COMPLIES WfTH THE L INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDA'l'IONS, AND/ OR lHE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTION Of me BUILDING COOE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTfO IN THE DEFICIENCY REPORT _ ____,,,_':LJ.~~= ~ . 0 ')._ /~ 0 "l-- $ignatu111 ,. ~~ .Tdv/!f;eJ.Jt}r'J ' PrintNalJIII L0/L0 39\td ~31N30 NMOl NOS~\10 Dahl of Reptirt EBE10ZE0IE ICBO Certllicinion Number City/ CQUnty eortl&atlon Number Rev: 7197 LP:L0 Z00Z/P0/E0 03/12/2002 TUE 10:57 FAX 444 MTGL-ANAHEIM Corporate: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A Anaheim, CA 92606 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 71'1.632.2974 Branch: 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.:3990 DSA / OSHPD REPORT lYPEOFWOAIC INSP.CTOA UTECHNICAN AVAllABLE": SOIL REPORT (Y) (N) J\IIQ11TECT $ At:WI APPROVEO FLA N) FOR WFFK FNDI~ -£?j-CJ'Z._. REPORT HO. • PB CONTRACTOR PI.AtHfLE llO. SUB·CONTllACTOR, INSPECTION ADDRfSS s7.$' ff.l.-ll,M 141003/010 Branch: 441 W. State Street El Centro, CA 92243 Toll Free: 877.563.TEST Tel: 760.482.0600 Fax: 760.482.0650 SPEr.'l (N) APPROVED SHOP DAAWING M (H) PROJECT. NO. ,A_ . ~2..."2...-µJ.J/ l OF / REPOR'l'ING REQUIREMENTS: JCUO FIUU) INSPECTION MANUAI./MTG1, SOIL, MANUAL 'REVIEW PREVIOUS IU::!'()RTS AND LISTS Ir-THERE IS NON-Ct)Nr1.JRM1NG WORK AT THE HNJ) OF THE WORK DAY. OR MISSING MTRS, AND RFIS, ETC .• FILL OUT ANIJ /\Tli\CI I A PGFICIENCY REPORT WHEN A onr,1cmNCY, YOURS OR A PREVIOUS INSPECTOR'S, JS CORRllCTilD, so NOTE 0.N nib OJ:<ltilNAI. DhrlCIHNt'Y REPORT AND SUBMIT A COPY WITH YOIIR WEEK'S REPORTS. MAll:lllAI..S lJSED DY CONTRACTOR (INCLUDE JIESEAACH REPORT NO. p,..) CONTRACTORS BJUIPMEtlT / MANPOW.n USED: AREA. BAIO LINES. Pl[CES oesSRVE{); STl!UCTURAL NOTES, Dlal"Alt. OR AFIS USED: A-to, r /,8c:r TEMPERATURC: (e. s1r1:r1MesrARr: ___ 9 ~~--- Print Nam@ SAMPLE!; TAl<fN: .,,V-0 TESTI! RECUrru:o: ~~ SITE TIME FINIS!i: • . I (. --'J cf VERIRED BY:J-TRAVEL TIME: Data or Report ICBO Corti!ieatian Num!ltr ~ev; 7/97 Mar-13-0l l0:51A Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 '· Air Treatment Corporation HVAC MANUFACTURERS REPRESENTATIVE TO: Nadel DA TE: March 13, 2001 ATTN: Ron Gross FROM: Ted Obrockta FAX NO.: 858.552.8429 PAGE 1 OF 11 REGARDING: Emerald Lake Corp. Ron. Tom Harrington requested I fax the FXV Tower Layout package to you. D Main Office 807 S. Lemon Ave. Walnut, CA 91789 {909} 869-7975 Fax(909)595-6874 0 San Francisco 6116 Merced Ave. # 303 Oakland, CA 94611 (510) 655-3990 Fax(510)655-7966 @San Diego 333 S. Juniper St. Ste. 200 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-2040 Fax (760) 743-2144 D Sacramento 5714 Folsom Blvd.# 108 Sacramento, CA 95819 (916) 354-0708 Fax(916)354-0006 P.01 Mar-13-01 10:52A Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 P.02 B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin @2000 Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. Series 1500 Product Layout Electronic Llbra,y Document# 1258 Cooling towers, coolers, and condensers, all depend upon an adequate supply of fresh, ambient air to provide design capacity. Other important considerations such as the proximity to building air intakes or discharges also must be taken into account when selecting and designing the equipment site. This bulletin presents the design guidelines for siting one, two or three cells of Series 1500 products in several situations typically encountered by designers. All of the guidelines present recommended spacing requirements for good performance, but more liberal spacing should be ·provided where possible. Also, note that as the size of an instailation grows larger and larger, the total amount of heat being rejected to the atmosphere and the volume of discharge air increases accordingly -to the point where the towers virtually create their own environment. As a result, it becomes increasingly difficult to apply a set of correct general guidelines each case. Consequently, it is recommended the layout of large Series1500 installations be referred to the appropriate Product Department in Baltimore for review. As is typical of axial fan equipment, Series 1500 Products are not generally suited for indoor or ducted applications. In such situations, the Series V centrifugal fan unit is preferred. General Considerations: When selecting the site for a Series 1500 Product installation, consider the following factors. 1. Locate the unit to prevent the warm discharge air and any associated drift from being introduced into the fresh air intakes of the building(s) served by the unit or the intakes of neighboring buildings. I 2. Consider the potential for plume formation and its effect on the surroundings, such as large windowed areas, and pedestrian or vehicular traffic arteries. 3. Provide sufficient unobstructed space around the unit(s) to ensure an adequate supply of fresh, ambient air to the intake. Avoid situations where adjacent walls or structures might deflect some of the discharge airstream back into the air inlet (recirculation) or promote recirculation by generating high, downwarq air velocities in the vicinity of the intake. Also, ELD #1258 (1/1812000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.1 Mar-13-01 10:52A Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 P.03 avoid locations where building air intakes or exhausts, such as boiler stacks in the vicinity of the unit, might raise the inlet wet bulb temperature or starve the unit of air. 4. Provide adequate space around the unit for piping and proper servicing and maintenance as shown below in Figure 1. //(/Jf////(/ ////////// Figure 1 --d"" See explaination below / / / / / / / / 5. The top of the fan discharge cylinders must be at least level with and preferably higher than any adjacent walls or buildings. 6. When possible, orient the unit such that prevailing winds blow discharge airstream toward blank-off side of unit. 7. The recommended configuration for multiple cetr units is back-to-back with the air intakes facing outward, rather than end-to-end in a line. Multiple cells arranged in end-to-end tend to create a "wail" of moist discharge air which could easily be swept into the intakes due ·10 prevailing wind. Additionally, in the extreme cases, when multiple cells are arranged with the air inlets facing, the dimensions given should be doubled for adequate air to each unit. The "Layout Guidelines" section of this bulletin describe several typical siting situations for Series 1500 Products. If these guidelines do not cover a particular situation or if the layout criteria cannot be met, please refer the application to the appropriate Product Department in Baltimore for review. Please indicate prevailing wind direction, geographic orientation of the unit(s), and other factors such as large buildings and other obstructions that rriay influence layout decisions. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.2 Mar-13-01 10:52A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-743-2144 P.04 A. Adjacent to a Building or Wall 1. Unit Orientation When a Series 1500 Product is located near a building wait, the preferred arrangement is to have the tower situated with the blank-off side (unlouvered face) or ends facing the adjacent wall or building. 2. Air Inlet Requirements: Whenever possible .the blank-off side of the uriit should face the wall. Should it ever be absolutely necessary to install a unit with the air inlet facing a wall, allow a minimum "d' dimension between the air inlet and the wall. Below is the method for determining the "d" dimension for a Series 1500 unit located with the air inlet facing a solid wall: The envelope velocity should not exceed 300 fpm using the following equation: Envelope Velocity = Unit .cfm Envelope area Note: The louver face CFM for the Series 1500 coil products is 70% of the total unit airflow. The remaining 30% of the airflow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. The Envelope area is [2(H+h) +L]d where: H is the height of the air inlet face in ft h is the elevation of the unit in ft (the maximum elevation is 4') L is the length of the air inlet in ft d is the distance from the wall to the air inlet face in ft For your convenience, we have tabulated the "d" for 0\ 21, and 4' elevation for the one cell, two cell and three cell Series 1500 cooling towers and coil products in Table 1 and 2, respectively. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.3 Mar-13-01 10:53A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-743-2144 P.05 Table 1: Minimum Air Inlet Distance ''d" to Solid Wall for Cooling Towers Elevation Single-Cell Model Number o· . 2' 4' 15146, 15160, 15176 7' 4' 3' 1s1s2, 1s1n, 1s201, 1s219 7.5' 4.5 3' 15200, 15227,15250 7' 4' •' 3' 15214,15245,15270, 15282 7.5' 4.5' 3' 15296,15325, 15350 15368 9.5' 5.5' 4' 15310, 15340,15365,15385, 15425 10.5' 6' 4.5' Elevation Two-Cell Model Number O' 2' 4' 15146--2 thru 1-5176-2 10.5' 7' 5' 15162-2 thru 15219-2 12' 7.5' 5.5' 15200-2 thru 15250-2 7' 4' 3' 15214-2 th·ru 15282-2 12.5' 7.5' -5.5' 15296-2 thru 15368-2 15' ·g~s· 7' 15310-2thru 15425-2 16.5' 10.5' 8' Elevation Three-Cell Model Number o· 2' 4' 15146-3 thru 15175-3 12.5' g• 7' 15162-3 thru 15219-3 1~.s· 10' 7.5' 15200-3 thru 15250-3 14.5' 9.5' 1' 15214-3 thru 15282·3 16' 10.5' 7.5' 15296-3 thru 15368-3 18' 12.5' 9.5' 15310-3 thru 15425-3 20' 14' 10.5' ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.4 Mar-13-01 10:53A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-743-2144 P.06 Table 2: Minimum Air Inlet Distance "d" to Solid Wall for Series 1·500 Coil Products Single.Cell Elevation Single-Cell FXV & Low HP FXV CXV Model Number Model Number o· 2' 4' CXVG-4-95 FXV 421-424 4' 4' 4' CXV 103-153 FXV 431-434 4' 4' 4' CXV160-206 FXV441-444 4.5' 4' 4' FXV Q440-Q441 CXV 196-305 FXV641·644 5' 4.5' 4' FXV Q640-Q641 CXV310-481 FXV661-664 7' 6' 5,5' FXV Q660-Q661 Two-Cell Elevation Two-Celt FXV & Low HP FXV CXV Model Number Model Number o· 2' 4' CXV64-95 FXV421-424 4' 4' 4' CXV 103-153 FXV431-434 5' 5.5' 5.5' CXV 160-206 FXV 441-444 8' 7.5' 7' FXV Q440-Q441 CXV 196-305 FXV641-644 10.5' 10' 9.5' FXV 0640 -0681 CXV 310-481 FXV661-664 15.5' 15' 14' FXV Q660-Q661 ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.5 Mar-13-01 10:53A Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 P.07 B. The Well Installation If the well extends to "L", the length of the air inlet face, on either side of the tower, then the layout can be considered a well layout. The following method is used to determine the "d" dimension for a unit installed in a well layout. ,-------, f 1· l I Airlnkt I ..& I I I I I I I I I I Figure 3 The downward velocity for a well installation should not exceed 300 fpitl for coil products and 400 fpm for cooling towers. The downward velocity is determined using the following equation: Downward velocity = Unit cfm Useable well area Note: The louver face CFM for the Series 1500 coil products is 70% of the total unit airflow. The remaining 30% of the airflow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. The usable well area is defined as (d)(L+4)+4 where d is the distance from the air inlet of the unit to the wall of the well in ft L is the length of the air intake of the unit in ft. Table 3 gives the "d" dimensions for multiple cooling towers, closed circuit cooling towers, and condensers installed in a well. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000} B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.6 -Mar-13-01 10:54A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-743-2144 P.08 Table 3 : Minimum Air Inlet Distance "d1 for Well Installations S 1500C r T eries oorng owers Number Of Cells Model Number One Two Three 15146, 15160,15176 9' 10.5' 11' 15162, 1s1n. 15201,1s219 11' 13' 14' 15200,15227,15250 12' 14.5' 15.5' 15214,15245, 15270,15282 14' 17' 18' 15296, 15325, 15350,15368 14' 16' 17' 15310, 15340, 15365, 16.5' 19' 20' 15385, 15425 Series 1500 Industrial Closed Circuit Cooling Towers (FXV) & Evaporative Condensers (CXV) FXV & Low HP FXV Number of Cells .. CXV ~odel Number Model Number One Two 64-95 421-424 9' 11.5' 103-153 431-434 11' 13' 160-206 441-444 12' 14' Q440-Q441 12' 14' 196-305 641~644 16' 18' Q640-Q641 16' 18' 310-481 661-664 17.5' t9.5' Q66Q..Q661 17.5' 19.5' ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.7 Mar-13-01 10:54A Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 C. The Louvered or Slotted Waif Installations: Check to see if the layout meets the requirements for a well installation. If the criteria for the we/I location are met, the layout is satisfactory. If the layout does not satisfy the criteria for the well installation, analyze the layout as follows: --------4---------....-.----------·------ 4' min. 2'->-Air Inlet 2' Figure 4 1. Air inlet requirements: The Series 1500 Products should be arranged within the enclosure such that a. The air inlet directly faces the louver or slot locations as shown in Figure 4. b. Maintain at least four feet ( 4' -0") between the unit air inlets and the louvered or slotted wall for uniform air distribution. c. If the available space does not permit the products to be arranged with the air inlets facing the louvered or slotted walls and the enclosure cannot be modified to permit such an arrangement, consider the alternative illustrated in Figure 5. The arrangement shown in Figure 5 should be restricted to one-cell or two-cell units. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.8 P.09 Mar-13-01 10:54A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-743-2144 II 11 I Figure 5 2. Louver Requirements: Air inlet I I I I I a. Louvers must provide at least 50% net free area to ensure that the unit airtlow is not reduced due to static pressure losses. b. Determining the required total louver or slot area is based on drawing the total unit airflow through the net free area of the louvers at a velocity of 600 fpm or less. c. The louver area should be located in the walls of the enclosure such that air flows uniformly to the air inlets. d. If the unit is elevated to ensure that the discharge is at the same level as the enclosure. It is acceptable to extend the louvered or slot area below the base of the units up to 2 ft. if needed to achieve the minimum gross louver area . To calculate downward air velocity, the usable louvered or slot area may extended up to 2 ft. beyond the ends of the unit. Calculate the louver velocity as follows: Note: The louver velocity for the FXVICXV is based on 70% of the total unit airflow which is the amount entering the air inlet face. The remaining 30% of the airllow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. For the Series 1500 Cooling Towers: Louver Velocity= Total Unit J\irtlow (cfm) =600fpm ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering BuJletin P.9 P.10 Mar-13-01 10:SSA Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 . . % Louver Free Area (sq ft) x Gross Louver Area For the Series 1500 Coil Products: P.ll Louver Velocity= Louver face Airflow (cfm) = 600 fpm % Louver Free Area (sq ft) x Gross Louver Area ELD #1258 {1/18/2000J B.A.C, Engineering Bulletin P.10 DATE: March 27, 2001 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 EsGil Corporation 1.n Partners.iip wit.i (jovemment for '.Buifaing Safatg SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. 0 ~(¾NT ~ 0 PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT NAME: Office Bldg. for Emerald Lake Corporate Center D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to· the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nadel Architects, Inc. Attn: Ron Gross 5465 Morehouse Dr., Suite 165, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross Telephone#: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: of 2.trf 01 (by:FA.,,;0 Fax #: (858) 552-8429 Mail ....,,,-elephone D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation Fax£-" In Person D GA D MB 1:8:1 EJ D PC Enclosures: 3/16 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 I >r' Carlsbad 0 1-0190 III March 27, 2001 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/16 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: March 27, 2001 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo ..,. j Carlsbad 0 1-0190 III March 27, 2001 5. Applicant shall provide a "Special Inspection Program" to the Building Official. The Building Department will resolve this correction. 37. From the soils report provided: + Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report -page 12). If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 56. Obtain approval from the City of Carlsbad Building Department for the specified use of ABS and/or PVC piping materials for the waste system underground. This is a three story building and the California Plumbing Code restricts the use of nonmetallic piping in three story taller buildings. Specification rf!Jmains: Note 2.3 on material specifications. MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 57. Provide the cooling tower installation instructions for the required sidewall clearance check. The information provided did not match up with the equipment specified on the mechanical schedule. Include with the response: The size of the equipment, the size of the mechanical enclosure, the distance calculations, and the clearances provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. DATE: March 7, 2001 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 EsGil Corporation 1.n Partn.e.rs/i.ip wit/i. (jovemment fdi: '.Builifing Safetg NADEL JAN O 9 2001 RECEIVED SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. c:e[APPLICANU D JURIS. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT NAME: Office Bldg. for Emerald Lake Corporate Center D The plans transmitted herewith ·have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building-codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. cgj The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil C~rporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. . . D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. cgj The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nadel Architects, Inc. Attn: Ron Gross 5465 Morehouse Dr., Suite 165, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgii Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross Telephone#: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: e,-8--01 (by:lo.¥) Fax #: (858) 552-8429 Mail .,,,, Telephone D REMARKS: Fax _. In Person By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB 181 EJ D PC Enclosures: 2/26 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O 1-0190 II March 7, 2001 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/26 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: March 7, 2001 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. ~ ~ P-6Sf'o~~ u.,;.,- c. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo l"· ,-' .. Carlsbad 0 1-0190 II March 7, 2001 5. Applicant shall provide a "Special Inspection Program" to the Building Official. The Building Department will resolve this correction. 22. The corridor adjacent to bathrooms 102 and 104 was modified and with the new length this corridor is a dead end corridor exceeding the maximum allowable length of 20'. The original correction is still applicable. See original correction list. 26. Elevator shafts extending through more than two floor levels shall be vented to the outside. The area of vent shall be not less than 3 1/2% of the shaft area and a minimum of 3 square feet per elevator. Section 3004. Clearly show the minimum vent area. 27. When the elevator vertical travel is 25' or more, the elevator lobby or entrance area shall be provided with an approved smoke detector as required by Section 3003.2. Smoke detectors symbol was not identified on the E plans. Original correction is still applicable. 31. A Class "A" roof covering is required. City ordinance. Clearly specify it on plans. 36. The following corrections are the remaining corrections for disabled access requirements from the original correction list: • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 1. Show or note that the maximum slope of the parking surface at the accessible space, in any direction, is ¼" per ft (2.083%), per Section 11298.4.4. The maximum slope at the passenger loading zone is to be 2%. + Disabled accessible parking spaces located in front of door 100 have a slope of 3.26% approx. This slope is > than the maximum allowab!e slope of 2.083%. Original correction is still applicable. 37. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. + No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. Carlsbad 01-0190 II March 7, 2001 38. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. + No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. 39. Specify size, ICBO number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge, end distance and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Show it on plans for interior walls. + No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. 40. Show height and construction details of all concrete and masonry walls. Chapter 21. Clearly show it on plans for: mechanical enclosure, trash enclosure and any appurtenance structure or retaining wall. • No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen The following corrections remain from the 1/29 plan check. They were not addressed at the next submittal. PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 56. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the sizes and locations of the gas meters and water meter; and the sizes, routes, and slopes of the building sewer, storm drainage system, site gas lines, and site water lines. The provided Civil drawings do not clearly show the building drain to building sewer connections, please provide. Be sure that the Civil drawings address the sewer connection to the mechanical enclosure. 57. As per UPC, Section 710.0, provide backwater valves on all building drains which serve plumbing fixtures with flood rim elevations below the public or private upstream manhole rim elevations. Only fixtures with flood rim levels below the public upstream manhole rim elevation may flow through a backwater valve. Please show the elevation of the upstream public or private sewer manhole cover. . T Carlsbad 01-0190 II March 7, 2001 58. Confirm with the City Wastewater (sewer) District that it is acceptable to use a sewer connected floor sink (See "H" on P1) for emergency disposal of the elevator hydraulic fluid. Additionally, show how the trap seal is maintained at this fixture. · 59. Detail how overflow condensate secondary (overflow) protection is provided for the mechanical units located in the ceiling areas. 60. Obtain approval from the City of Carlsbad Building Department for the specified . use of ABS and/or PVC piping materials for the waste system underground. This is a three story building and the California Plumbing Code restricts the use of nonmetallic piping in three story r taller buildings. MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE} 61. Provide the cooling tower installation instructions for the required sidewall clearance check. ENERGY CONSERVATION 62. The PERF-1 and MECH-1 forms must be signed on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ' . EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTRE PLAN CHECK NO. 01-0190 Project Address: 1525 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA PLAN CHECK RESPONSES A. 2 sets of plans delivered to the City of Carlsbad with Engineering and Fire department correction list attached and 1 set of plans delivered to Esgil with correction list attached B. Correction list attached 5. The Architect will resolve special inspection program with the Building Department 22. Distance of corridor at 1st floor adjacent to doors 102 & 104 is 19' -1 O" (indicated on plans). Doors at second floor corridor adjacent to doors 203 & 204 are modified to swing both ways (response to your your earlier plan check comment# 16 on January 29rn). 26. Added 3 sq. ft. of vent area. 6 sq. ft. provided / 5 sq. ft. required. 27. Smoke detector on electrical plans. Symbol call out identified on E-9, Electrical Legend. 31. See roof specification on A2.04 36. Adjusted slope. Indicated on Sheet C-5 Precise Grading Plan and 5/A 1.02 37. Soils Report Included. See page 7 & 8. 38. See Soils Report Page 9 and Sheet S 1.1-Basis of Design notes. 39. See 1/A10.2 and 2/A10.2. 40. Mechanical Enclosure walls indicated on A 1.02 and 16/S4.1. Trash enclosure walls indicated on A 1.02 and 14/S4.1 56. See C-3. C-5 & IP-2of Civil Drawings. 57. Back water valves are not required. The nearest upstream manhole rim elevation is 138.75 which is below the finished floor elevation 58. Revised plans to include emergency disposal tank located in 1st floor Janitor Room. See Detail H / P-1. _J 59. See Detail E / M-1. This detail shows that the unit will be equipped with an automatic condensate level switch that shuts the unit down if the main condensate fails or plugs up. 60. Revised plumbing specs -See P-1. 61. See attached drawings. 62. Signatures included EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersfiip witfi (jovemment for '13ui[rfing Safety DATE: January 29, 2001 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. SET: I 0 APPLICANT 0~ 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: Office Bldg. for Emerald Lake Corporate Center D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. · D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nadel Architects, Inc. Attn. Ron Gross 5465 Morehouse Dr., Suite 165, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. [gj Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross (~. ,L,IJ Telephone#: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: ! ) 30 / o, (by: (f.-. ) Fax #: (858) 552-8429 Mail Jelephone ../ Fax V In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA ~ MB ~ EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-lhr JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Office (shell) ACTUAL AREA: 84,500 SF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 112,000 SF STORIES: 3 14k X 2 (stories) X 2 (60'yds/ 4) X 2 (sprinklers) HEIGHT: 45' SPRINKLERS?: YES REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 01/16/01 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: January 29, 2001 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): OCCUPANT LOAD: 845 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/19 PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or chang~. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • PLANS 2. All sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Plumbing and mechanical plans are missing the seal and signature. 3. Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained. 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with the 1998 e~ition of the California Building Code (Title 24 ), \Vhioh adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC nnd UPC and the 1996 NEC. 5. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. • SITE PLAN. 6. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. 7. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan." Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 8. Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 505. Provide hatching over the area covered around the building. 9. Show on the site plan all proposed walls, retaining walls and fences. Specify their heights on the plans. Provide construction details if a part of this permit. • FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION 10. Provide details of the one-hour fire-resistive construction. Include roof/ceiling assemblies, floor/ceiling assemblies, column and beam assemblies, etc. ' 11. Detail how one-hour fire-resistive wall construction is maintained at built-in wall fixtures and behind mailboxes, fire extinguisher cabinets, electric panels exceeding 16 square inches in area, etc. Section 709.7. 12. Provide a note on the plans stating: "Penetrations of fire-resistive walls, floor-- ceilings and roof-ceilings shall be protected as required in UBC Sections 709 and 710." 13. Clearly identify location and hourly fire-resistive rating of vertical shafts on the plans. Provide construction details showing location of fire dampers and how fire resistivity will be maintained at floors and roofs. Section 711. 14. Fire-resistive exterior wall. construction shall be maintained through attic areas or other areas containing concealed spaces. Section 709.3.1. Clearly show it on plans for all exterior walls and at wall section 4/A6.04. 15. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, shafts and exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Section 106.3.3. • EXITS 16. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more. Section 1003.3.1.5. According to the future corridor shown on the third floor plan, doors 301 and 301 B shall be Hospital type doors (one leaf swinging in one direction and the other leaf swinging in the opposite direction). 17. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to the width, swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 10. Section 1003.3.1.1. • STAIRWAYS 18. Stairway handrails should not project more than 3-1/2 inches into the required width. Trim and stringers may not project more than 1-1/2 inches. Section 1003.3.3.2. Show it on plans for stairways 2 & 3. Carlsbad O 1-0190 January 29, 2001 19. Stairway riser must be 4 inches minimum and 7 inches maximum and minimum run shall be 11 inches. Section 1003.3.3.3. See the exception for private stairways serving less than 10 occupants. Show it on plans for stairway 1. 20. Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 1005.3.3: a) b) Doors should be labeled one and one-half hours or one-hour fire assemblies, and noted that the maximum transmitted temperature end point shall not exceed 450 degrees (F) above ambient at the end of 30 minutes of the fire exposure specified in UBC Standard 7-2. Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to '-the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected openings. Only exit doors are permitted to open into the corridor. 21. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1 /2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Clearly show it on plans for stairways 2 and 3. Note: Where access for the disabled is necessary, Title 24 requires handrails on both sides to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the bottom nosing. Clearly show it for stairway 1. • CORRIDORS 22. When two exits are required, dead end corridors are limited to 20 feet. Section 1004.2.6. Clearly show compliance on the plans for the corridor adjacent to rooms 111, 112 and 113. • EXIT SIGNS 23. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 1003.2.8.2. According to the future corridor shown on the third floor plan, doors 301 and 301 B shall be Hospital type doors (one leaf swinging in one direction and the other leaf swinging in the opposite direction}. Exit signs must be shown on both sides of doors. • ELEVATORS 24. Elevators shall be enclosed in a one-hour shaft except in Type I and Type II F.R. construction where the elevator shall be in a two hour shaft. Section 711. Carlsbad 0 1-0190 January 29, 2001 25. Every opening into an elevator shaft enclosure shall be protected by a self-closing fire assembly having a one-hour fire rating in one-hour shafts and one and one-half hours in two hour shafts. Section 711.4. 26. Elevator shafts extending through more than two floor levels shall be vented to the outside. The area of vent shall be not less than 3 1 /2% of the shaft area and a minimum of 3 square feet per elevator. Section 3004. 27. When the elevator vertical travel is 25' or more, the elevator lobby or entrance area shall be provided with an approved smoke detector as required by Section 3003.2. ' 28. Provide notes, details or specifications to show the elevator will comply with USC Sections 3002-3007 and Title 24. • GLASS AND GLAZING 29. Specify on the window schedule the glass type and thickness to show compliance with Table 24-A and Graph 24-1. 30. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. c) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions: i) Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and: ii) Exposed bottom edge is less than 18 inches above the floor, and: iii) Exposed top edge is greater than 36 inches above the floor, and: iv) One or more walking surfaces are within 36 inches horizontally of the · plane of the glazing. d) Clearly show on plans the particular door and windows that shall be provided with safety glass (general notes are not adequate to resolve this correction}. Also provide a complete window schedule. Carlsbad 0 1-0190 January 29, 2001 • ROOFS 31. A Class "A" roof covering is required. City ordinance. 31. Specify roof slope. 32. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. ' 33. Specify minimum 1/4 inch per foot roof slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water. Section 1506.1. 34. Show roof drains and overflows. Size drains per Appendix D of UPC. Section 1506. • MISCELLANEOUS LIFE/SAFETY 35. Guardrails (Section 509.1 ): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 36. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. • FOUNDATION 37. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 38. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 39. Specify size, ICBO number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge, end distance and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Show it on plans for interior walls. Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 • MASONRY AND CONCRETE 40. Show height and construction details of all concrete and masonry walls. Chapter 21. Clearly show it on plans for: mechanical enclosure, trash enclosure and any appurtenance structure or retaining wall . . • STRUCTURAL 41. Collector elements ("drag beams") shall be designed using the special load combinations of Sectior.i 1612.4, as required by section .1633.2.6. Exception: Structures braced entirely of light-frame shear walls. Please clarify where was the Q 0 factor included within the structural calculations? ' 42. Clearly show where within the structural calculations were included the considerations for the orthogonal effects, as required in Section 1633.1. • ADDITIONAL 43. See attached lists for: electrical, mechanical, plumbing and energy corrections. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1996 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: MORTEZA BEHESHTI 44. Show the available fault current (lsc) from the serving utility co. Carlsbad 0 1-0190 January 29, 2001 45. The ampere interrupting capacity (AIC) ratings of the service shown is less than available utility fault current. NEC 110-9, 230-65. 46. Submit load calculations summary. Include long continuous loads (LCL) and the largest motor loads. NEC 220. 47. Specify the dimensions of equipment rated 1200 amps or more. NEC 110-16(c). 48. Provide the required access and entrance to working space for equipment rated 1200 amps or more and over 6 feet wide. NEC 110-16(c). 49. Show the location of all panels. NEC 110-16,240-24,300-21,: 50. Each commercial building and each commercial occupancy accessible to pedestrians shall be provided with at least one outlet in an accessible location at each entrance to each tenant space for sign or outline lighting system use. NEC 600-5(a) 51. Note the following requirements on the prints for panelboards supplying ·fire alarm equipment: Lockable cover, identified circuit breaker (red), and a breaker "lock-off'' device to be installed. 52. · Please describe the footage and depth in footing of the "UFER" ground. 53. Note that the main service will not be energized prior to the Building Inspectors' receipt of a third party NRTL testing laboratory performance test certification for the service ground fault protection. NEC 230-95 54. Provide a disconnect for each sign. NEC 600-6 55. Note on the single line diagram that all service disconnect devices shall be labeled as a "Service Disconnecting Means". NEC 230-?0(b) Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858} 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. • SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 56. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the sizes and locations of the gas meters and water meter; and the sizes, routes, and slopes of the building sewer, storm drainage system, site gas lines, and site water lines. The provided Civil drawings do not clearly .. show the building drain to building sewer connections, please provide. Be sure that the Civil drawings address the sewer connection to the mechanical enclosure. 57. As per UPC, Section 710.0, provide backwater valves on all building drains which serve plumbing fixtures with flood rim elevations below the public or private upstream manhole rim elevations. Only fixtures with flood rim levels below the public upstream manhole rim elevation may flow through a backwater valve. Please show the elevation of the upstream public or private sewer manhole cover. 58. Confirm with the City Wastewater (sewer) District that it is acceptable to use a sewer connected floor sink (See "H" on P1) for emergency disposal of the elevator hydraulic fluid. Additionally, show how the trap seal is maintained at this fixture. 59. Detail how overflow condensate secondary (overflow) protection is provided for the mechanical units located in the ceiling areas. 60. Obtain approval from the City of Carlsbad Building Department for the specified use of ABS and/or PVC piping materials for the waste system underground. This is a three story building and the California Plumbing Code restricts the use of nonmetallic piping in three story r taller buildings. MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 61. Provide the cooling tower installation instructions for the required sidewall clearance check. ENERGY CONSERVATION 62. The PERF-1 and MECH-1 forms must be signed on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 0 1-0190 January 29, 2001 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1998 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17 .11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 1. Show or note that the maximum slope of the parking surface at the accessible space, in any direction, is s¼" per ft (2.083% ), per Section 1129B.4.4. The maximum slope at the passenger loading zone is to be s2%. o CURB RAMPS 2. Revise plans to show that curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of a street intersection or where a pedestrian way crosses a curb, per Section 1127B.5.1. Clearly show on plans the curb ramps at the connection between sidewalks and accessible parking spaces passenger loading zone. • STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS • Clearly show on plans the required information for all stairways. 3. Provide sections, details or notes to show that handrails are to be located ~34" but s38" above nosing of treads, per Section 1133B.4.2.1. 4. Show that handrails extend a ~12" beyond top nosing, and ~12"-plus-tread-width beyond the bottom nosing, per Section 1133B.4.2.2. 5. Per Section 1006.9.2.6a, please provide details, sections or notes to show that handgrip portions of handrails are: a) ~1¼" and s1½" in cross sectional dimension. b) The shape may provide an equivalent gripping surface. c) The handgrip portion shall have a smooth surface, without any sharp corners. Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 6. Show or note that interior stair treads are marked at the upper approach and the lower tread of each stair, by a strip of clearly contrasting color, per Section 1133B.4.4, as follows: a) At least 2" wide. b) Placed parallel to and not more than 1" from the nose of the step or landing. c) The strip shall be as slip resistant as the other treads of the stair. • MULTIPLE..ACCOMMODATION SANITARY FACILITIES • Clearly show on plans all applicable dimensions. 7. Revise plans to show that at least one water closet fixture, located in a compartment, shall provide the following, per Section 1115B.7.1.2: a) ;;?:28" clear space from a fixture (or ;;?:32" clear space from a wall) at one side. b) Clear space in front of the water closet shall be: i) ;?:48" if the compartment has a end opening door. ii) ;?:60" is required for side opening doors. c) Grab bars shall not project more than 3" into the clear spaces indicated. • RESTROOM FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES • Clearly show on plans all applicable dimensions. 8. Show that accessible lavatories comply with the following, per Sections 1115B.9.1 and California Plumbing Code: a) The counter top is ~34" maximum above the floor. b) ;;?:29" high, reducing to 27" at a point located 8" back from the front edge. c) ;;?:9" high x 30" wide and 17" deep at the bottom. • SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 9. Revise plans to show that grab bars comply with the following, per Section 11158.8: a) Grab bars shall be located on each side or one side and the back of the water closet stall or compartment. b) They shall be securely attached 33" above the floor, and parallel. NOTE: Where a tank-type toilet is used which obstructs placement at 33", the grab bar may be installed as high as 36". c) Grab bars at the side shall be located: '··· i) 15" to 16½" (±1 ") from the center line of the water closet stool. ii) Be ~42" long with the front end positioned 24" in front of the stool. iii) Total length of bars at the back shall be ~36". d) The diameter, or width, of the grab bar gripping surface is ~1 ¼" but ~1 ½", or the shape shall provide an equivalent gripping surface. e) If mounted adjacent to a wall, the space between the wall and the grab bar shall be 1½". f) Be designed to support 250#. 10. Revise plans ~o show ~40" height for: a) The operable parts of at least 1; i) Paper towel dispenser. ii) Sanitary napkin dispenser. iii) Waste paper disposal. iv) Other similar dispensing and/or disposal fixtures. b) The bottom edge of mirrors. • SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 11. Plans indicate proposed showers. Revise plans to show, or note, compliance with the following requirements, per Section 11158.6.2 and California Plumbing Code: a) Compartments are either: i) 42" in width between wall surfaces, and 48" minimum in depth (having an entrance opening ~ 42"), or, ii) ~60" in width between wall surfaces, and 30" minimum in depth (having a full opening width on the long side). As an alternate, showers 60" minimum in width may be 36" minimum in depth as long as the entrance opening width is a minimum of 36 inches. b) Grab bars comply with Section 11158.8 located: i) On walls adjacent to and opposite the seat. ii) Mounted ~33" but ::;;35" above the shower floor. c) If a threshold or recessed drop is used, it shall be: i) ::;;½" in height. ii) Be beveled or sloped ~45° from the horizontal. d) Indicate a folding seat, located on the wall adjacent to the controls, 18" above the floor. e) The soapdish shall be located on the control wall ~40" above the shower floor. f) If a separate shower compartment is not provided, the shower is be: i) Located in a corner, with L-s_haped grab bars extending along two adjacent walls. ii) A folding seat adjacent to the shower controls is to be provided. g) A flexible hand-held shower unit is required with: i) A hose 2::60" long. Head mounted 48" above finished floor. ii) NOTE: Two wall-mounted heads may be installed in lieu of the hand-held unit in areas subject to excessive vandalism, per Section 5-1505. END OF DOCUMENT Carlsbad 01-0190 January 29, 2001 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0190 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela DATE: January 29, 2001 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. Office Bldg. for Emerald Lake Corp. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-lhr BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. '• Office Bldg. 84500 64.00 Air Conditioning 81821 3.60 Fire Sprinklers 84500 1.80 TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee I,., I I 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee , ,., I Type of Review: 0 Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee =:BRepeats Comments: D Other D Hourly .__ ___ __.I Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) 5,408,000 294,556 152,100 5,854,656 $12,854.451 $8,355.391 $6,684~311 Sheet 1 of 1· macvalue.doc ,, ,, City of Carlsbad • ® n; ta;z., a tt-• ¥1 u~ 11 044 a.,,~. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S, PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in thi~ report can result in suspension of permit to build. Cl Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application O Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet D Sewer Fee Information Sheet DENIAL Please s~e he attached report of deficiencies marked wi D. ake necessary corrections to plans or specif · s for compliance with applicable codes and standard ubmit corrected plans and/or specifications to s offi for review. ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-27 41 CFO INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 / D D I 6 D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1-f;ly/~~ Show:/f~ 1. Pro_vide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. A. B. ,C. D. 3. A. B. C. Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. ' Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT ['JUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\WORDIDOCSICHKLST1Bulldlng Planched< Cklst Fonn (Generic).doc 2 Rev. 7/1,j/()(J D D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE . 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. ________________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: __________ _ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and -for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: _________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:____________ Date: ____ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: --------~----- Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engin_eering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:\WORD\OOCS\CHKLSnBuilding Plane/Jeck Cklst Fonn (RIDDLE• HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rev. 12/26196 D D D D D D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ----- 6b. Construction of the public improvements niay be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: ----------Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. ?a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading . requirements. Include accurate grading quantities ( cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading ~app~ ;~e~ssuance of a Building Permtt. Grading Inspector sign off by: __________ Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSnBullding Plancheck Cklst fom, (RIDDLE· HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 4 Rev. 9/26100 > ' ., 1sr 2ND D D D D D D D D D D D D 3RD D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: · ---------------Date: ·="· --. 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) · permit. The applicant shaff provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to · discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. CJ Required fees are attached -/Ylil.,rJ_ W ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ No fees required ~ ~ WATER METER REVIEW . D · 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately b_ill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:\WORDIDOCSICHKlSl\Bulldlng Plandleck Cldsl Fonn (Generic),doc 5 Rev. 7114/00 1ST D D D 12b. • • • BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter . If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check tne recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORDIDOCSICHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst Form (Genelic}.doc 6 Rev, 7114/00 ~ ,f' , -• 1sr 2ND 3RD D D D D DD 12c. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on. the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the.San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Additional Comments: H:IWORDIOOCSICHKLS1'Bullding Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc 7 Rev. 7/WOO .,-. . D D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unc firmed information from applicant. Calculation based 011 !ding plancheck plan submittal. Address: -..c..,..' f-,,-C~'---/----+-----'-----Bldg. Permit No. CJ0 () L O / :) D V (} l Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _ EDU CALCULATION : List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ( ~~ S~its: ~ (-{ rm) /&;, 9 EDU's: ----- Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units: ------EDU's: ----- ADT CALCULATIONS: List types anE:J~UWtf footages for all:s.es. Types of Use: Ll ~ ..::,S~Units: ~ l( S (;D ADT's: Types of Use: _____ _ Sq. Ft./Units: -----ADT's: ----- FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFO: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO 0 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: ____ / FEE/UNIT:_____ / X NO. UNITS: __ '--_,, ~ ( r ~.;7-1~t/' D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE s //5:, / 0 / 5 ADT'sNNITS: t.{7 7,-x62n, '[_,,C ~$ L01 11/0 D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 __ DIST. #2 L----'oisT. i!J_ ~ f,~ ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:____ = $ {jJ -D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: ,.5 / UNIT/SQ.FT.: 55:lf(slf\) X FEE/S~~ =$ 33! ~{f'O (,O / o 5. SEWER FEE ~ ~~ ~ vl,t v EDU's: ~ X FEE/EDU~: ~ ~ , ~ $ 3~ _{Cj_ { _., (f' / BENEFIT AREA:~ / C b -,,/0 V EDU's: _(fl?~ ~ X FEE/EDU.__ . &-, = $. {j / 7/i' 'i 0 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $ ~ HIGH ___ /LOW __ nn(a)_~ ?~ · FEE/AC:___ ~$\!~ <ot,-10-V 0 7. DRAINAGE FEES ACRES: ____ _ PLDA ___ _ X D 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 of2 Word\Docs\Misforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00 ~I --7Z) 10~~/2001 09: 42. FAX 760 438 4178 ENG. INSPECTIONS ~ ~"'hiC(/ (PLSt-f GRADIN~,1~:;E;~CKUST ij 01 . Mn ,1/ (J\__...,. , FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: Ck; P epcp FFte'e DATE: PROJECTIO eMePM.-b J...Atlc::e. GRADING PERMITNO, GRolt!:>o// LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: C.. l<C... Lo T I t'J ol. NIA= NOT APPLICABLE '----___ ;....;_ _______ _ -./=COMPLETE 0 = INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE 1st 2nd. ,./' o·· / v ../ ..,r :,./ v ).}(A, ./ / 1. Site access to requested lots adequate and k>gfcaffy grouped. 2. She erosion oonlrol measures adequate. 3. Overall site adequate for heaHh, safety and welfare d public. 4. Letter of request for partial release submitted • 5. 8 ~· X 11" site plan {anachment) showing requested lots submitted. 6. Compaction repo,t fr~ soils engineer submitted. 7. Engineer of Work certification of work done and pad elevalions. 8. Geologic engineers letter if unusual geologic ot subsuface c:onditi0n$ exist. 9. Project conditions of approval checked for conffidl. 10. Fire hydrants wi1hin 500 feet of building combu$tibfe$ and al weather roads access to $ire. Gf Partial release of grading for lhe above stated lots _is ap.Pr(MM1 fer Iha purpose Gf buDcllng pennlt issuance. ls~uance of building permits Is still subject ID an normal City raquiremen1a required pursuant to the buHding permit process. 0 Partial rerease of the s~e is denied for the following reasons: Date /4~ Construction Manager .. /tJlll /o1 Date 1 .. >, >, .Q .c -~ ~ ~ -u Q) Q) .<= .c (.) () ,:: C "' "' a: a: PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST -;-~-!?Ian Check No. CBO\O \90 Address \5?-5 Fa.ro.do.1 Ave ~-:r ~.Planner __ P ____ au ____ l __ G=o __ d ___ w ____ i ___ n _______ .Phone (760) 602-4625 ;;;1 c:'~APN: ;)\2 .. \?,0-~ 7-00 ~ :r'rType of Project & Use: Off;ce. Net Project Density: DU/AC 0 --"-_.__'------'------------=-=-r..;a..:..:::;... Zoning: C(D General Plan:_\\.,_!.=---Facilities Management Zone: ..5 l!>I.DCFD lin/n11tl # Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: Q...<,2.. Circle One --------- >, .c "' 'II: -"' 0 Q) .c () (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ____________________ ) · C "' a: )Coo Legend: ' •• fi 1:8:1 Item Cpmplete ' . Environmental Review Required: · • ' 4 D Item Incomplete -Needs your action YES_ NO~ TYPE ___ _ DATE OF COMPLETION:--,-,------ ~DD .. C6mpllance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO _2{_ TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. ________ DATE_· ___ _ PROJECT NO. _______ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: _________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. · Conditions of Approval: ' · ---........-'---------------------' ' I \ ,. f ~-.. . ' ~ ; ~ · ;:. j:L I~: ;.~~a;tal Zo.ne Assessmen~/~~m;liance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES No_L ; ,· ClCCoastal Commission Authority? YES NO If. California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite, 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coas~al Permit Deten:nination.·Form already COnJ_pleted?. YES .·. , NO J • I • ' ..,__ ' . _. • i ' J l . • " '~ 4 ' 1 I J f.., ~ "'i-& ... l -1 ~ t J :1 .., ~ ~ ... -. -$ I J J --If NO, 9omplete Coastal .Permit Determination Form now. , . . . ' . , -• ' . . • 'Co'astaf Permit Deter~i~atio~; Log. #'i I I. ' .• , . ' . ·, :'· ' ·• ' ~ 1 t .. ,.~ ,. , .. : • r ), · , " : ~" .. ... · · !,.. 1 ~· • :. i • .i • } • ... • ... , , :~ :-1 , I ~~,.,. .... .:' . ,. • 1t' ' ..... ,/• Fbllciw-Up Actions: .. C' I •: • • ,·; ' J. ~ J •• } ' • ' .l. ' _.,.. \' ·. 1) Stamp Build)Af f.1~-~,,.i-jis -;'Ex~m~·t,;". ~(,,·coa~ti Permit ::Reqbfred" Floor Plans). · · " (at minimum 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNJER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst ' . '¢·do ,lm:l.us1onary. Housing Fee require& YES.· . ·_. No"')(, .', '(Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance: -·rviav 21, 199:3:) -;. ..,"~..: '•' ;_,.,' Data, l;ntry Completed?. YES . NO.·' . · · (A/~j!P.s, A,f!!v!.!Y. ly1~in\ef'laQ,C~, enter GB#,, -toolb?r, Sc~ee·ns~·,Hp),tsJ~gt~El·e,s,,,E:onstruct Housing Y /N, Enter Fee,; UPDATE!), . • ~,J,,. .l~l~i.• ·.? .) ·. ·\ ---'-z -t., . ,_' _ -j ~ \_., i ./ ' , r, ' ··--\ ... ~.- , ... ..._•, .. · · Site Plan: ···~···E?·o ·\: \.,, . · ~ , -1~r1 ··t~.'r)..,.~f"" .,,.,lo!"',• . .':' ,....:1"','(i. ~.,,-,> j,") .. .... · .. '¢:on I '¢Jo D I. 1.. Provioe a· .tu·11y: dimensional. site ~pta~: ,tjrpWn :1 t~ · s~~ie. , .. 1 Show: N:orth ,a .. r(ow> property' lines/ eas·emlfmts, e,;cistii:flf 'a'f,t•'f>roppsed= sJr,y_ctur-es, streets, existing . $treet _ir.riP.rov~ment$, right~fLwaY width, ·,dimensidn'al. setbacks ~~d ex!rtJn,g,_ top:ogr·aph1c,d Im.es. \_> _r.:.,.... ' • -~--JI O '<r.._.. 2. Provide 1~ .. mH aeis.cl'.i_pti'on, of" pro.petW. ·and asses~or' ~ .parcel number. ' , -' -•, . -' Zoniris:,1:" 1 . Setbacks·: front:. ., ·_:,_/ 'I Required .~o Shown l 00 1 _.;...;;.._...,.._ __ _ Interior Side: ,. , Required ____ · ___ · ... .,....\'---O __ '. __ .--,-..,...,..-Shown _· __._} ()_' --=-------- . Street Side.:· Rear:. Req1.Jirecl Requireff :=· ·=·· =l=O='====== Shown ----'----=----'- Sh o_ w n. _\._0"---,1_....,.GJ"'----,--- .. ... Accessory struqture .s_et?a.~ks: Front: Rl:}quired .........,..-----------Shown ______ _ Interior $kl.~: eq· ··. ,. .·· ·Sh.own -'---------- ·street Side: · . Req1;1ir.ed . --------..,...--------. Hear: ·. Req.uired .,.-------- Structure. ~~p1=1rati'on:: . Requited _'_-------,-C. phow.n ________ _ 7-·. r 000 Shown o _ __._ ______ _____ Shown 33'9 ------$how n --.;__ __ ..;....a...._ ·' ./ I )• · . · · · · . . : .. :.. 'iJ;r_, ot ?1.· _ L,.,.,Jsc:,Qp<! a.pp _ :vq_ r. ' ,OK TO ISSUE AND ENTEREO APRR_OVAL-INTO.-C,OMP!JTER.: _· . , : OATE7}s[O (. _H:\APMIN\GOUNTEf:1\!3ldgPlnch.kRE1vGhk]st , ·-------- DATE: April 12, 2001 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partners/i.ip Wit/i. (jovemment for '.Buifi£ing Safetg SET:IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. ~~CANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT NAME: Office Bldg. for Emerald Lake Corporation Center D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. · D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: Applicant shall provide a "Special Inspection Program" to the Building Official. By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 4/5 Enclosures: trnsmtl.dot \ Carlsbad Fire Department NADEL 010190 1635 Faraday Ave. FEB O e ?f'l"·1 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Catego~ECEl~fiding Plan Date of Report: 0210512001 Reviewed by: ------------ Name: Nadel Architects · Address: 5465 Morehouse Drive Suite 165 City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: Job#: 010190 ------- Job Name: Emerald Lake Corp. Bldg#: CB010190 ------------------Job Address: 1425 Faraday Ave. Ste. or Bldg. No. ~ Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 010190 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID C9rlsb,ad Fire Department 16:S5 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Date of Report: 02/05/2001 ----------- Name: Nadel Architects Address: 5465 Morehouse Drive Suite 165 City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: Job Name: Emerald Lake Corp. Job Address: 1425 Faraday Ave. Reviewed by: 010190 010190 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Ste. or Bldg. No. Smoke fire dampers required to be connected to approved fire alarm system. cclrlsbad Fire Department 010190 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: Date of Report: 01/26/2001 ------------ Name: Nadel Architects Address: 5465 Morehouse Drive Suite 165 City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: Job#: 010190 Job Name: Emerald Lake Corp. Bldg #: CB010190 Job Address: -1~-;.._5_F_a-ra-da_y_A_v_e __ ------------Ste. or Bldg. No. D _Approved D Approved Subject to [81 Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and I or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 010190 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID Carlsbad Fire Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Date of Report: 0112612001 ----------- Name: Nadel Architects Address: 5465 Morehouse Drive Suite 165 City, State: San Diego CA 92121 Plan Checker: Job Name: Emerald Lake Corp. Job Address: 1425 Faraday Ave. See attached city policy. Reviewed by: 010190 010190 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Ste. or Bldg. No. 'P(' r l"-,, City of Carlsbad •@• aa-14 -s, a,; ,t4,, 1 Office of Fire Protection Services fOLICY October 25, 2000 SMOKE FIRE DAMPERS Background-The 1997 California Building Code Section 713.10 has revised the actuation requirements for smoke dampers. Generally~ smoke dampers are required to be actuated by either a smoke detector or a total-coverage smoke-detection system. Deputy Fire Marshals, Plan Checkers and Field Inspectors have found that stand-alone smoke detectors used to actuate these dampers are not listed with the California State Fire Marshal for that purpose. This complicates and extends the plan review process and causes delays in final inspection in the field. Therefore, until industry lists stand-alone smoke detectors for use in actuating smoke-fii:e dampers, the following policy will be · used in the City of Carlsbad: Policy -Smoke fire dampers are required to be wired to an approved fire alarm system. Building plan submittals are required io note that the smoke fire dampers.and smoke detectors that actuate the dampers comply with the above provision. A separate submittal to the Fire Department from a licensed fire alarm contractor is required for plan review of these systems. The submittal shall include floor plans, mechanical details of the dampers, wiring diagrams, permit fees, State Fire Marshal listings and manufacturer's· cut sheets on all devices. This policy may be reconsidered and modified when the smoke detector manufacturers have listed these devices with the Californj.a State Fire Marshal for this specific purpose. Building permits including such stand-alone systems will not be issued until it can be _demonstrated prior to permit issuance that all components of such systems are listed for their intended purpose by the California State Fire Marshal's Office. )~S~ Fire Marshal Approval Date 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008 • (760) 602-4660 • FAX (760) 602-8561 @ SEE STRUCTURAL CALCS SCANNED SEPARATELY : , I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR NEWPORT NATIONAL CORPORATION VISTA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 4, 2000 . C/5o( ol°ltJ(- 1 l 1 l 7 J l l . J l I 1 j GEOCON INCORPORATED Project No. 06585-12-01 October 4, 2000 Newport National Corporation 2117 Industrial Court, Suite C Vista, California 92083 Attention: Mr. Jeff Brusseau Subject: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 Gentlemen: CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 0 In accordance with your request and our proposal dated August 29, 2000, we have performed a Geotechnical Investigation for Carlsbad Research Center Lot 102. The accompanying report presents our conclusions and recommendations pertaining to developing the property as presently proposed based on the findings of our investigation and geotechnical data from previous site investigations. In our opinion, the site may be developed as planned provided the recommendations of the report are followed. Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEOCON INCORPORATED Joseph J. Vettel GE 2401 MNM:AS:JN:lek (6/del) Addressee 6960 Flanders Drive • San Diego, California 92121-297 4 ~ ~--------- Marc N. Moncilovich Staff Geologist a Fax ( 858) 558-6159 1 l ] } l -, 1 1 l l { .l ) J J TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................. I 2 . .SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 2 3 . SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS .......................... ,._ ............................................................. 2 3J --Fill (Qaf) ................................................................................................................................ 2 3.2 Alluvium (Qal) ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Santiago Formation (Ts) ........................................................................................................ 3 3.4 Santiago Peaks Metavolcanics (Jsp) .. : ................................................................................... 3 4. GROUNDWATER .............................................................................. : ............................................ 3 5 . GEOLOGIC HAZARDS .................................................................................................................. 4 -5.1 Faulting and Seismicity ......................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Liquefaction ........................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Landslides .............................................................................................................................. 5 6 . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS· ........................................................................... 6 6.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 6 6.2 Groundwater .......................................................................................................................... 6 6.3 Soil Excavation Characteristics ............................................................................................. 6 6.4 Grading .................................................................................................................................. 6 6.5 Settlement .............................................................................................................................. 7 6.6 Slope Stability ........................................................................................................................ 7 6.7 Foundations ............................................................................................................................ 7 6.8 Concrete Slabs-on-Grade ........................................................ : .............................................. 8 6.9 Seismic Design Parameters .................................................................................................... 9 6 .10 Retaining Walls and Lateral Loads ...................................................................................... 10 6.11 Slope Maintenance ............................................................................................................... 11 6.12 Drainage ............................................................................................................................... 11 6.13 Plan Review ......................................................................................................................... 12 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1, Vicinity Map Figure 2, Geologic Map Figure 3, Geologic Cross-Sections APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION Figures A-1-A-7, Logs of Borings APPENDIXB LABORATORY TESTING APPENDIXC RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIXD BORING LOGS AND LABORATORY DATA; GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION By Geotechnics Incorporated, June 19, 1998 l l J f l l l .. 1 J UPDATE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation for Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 102, __ a _proposed 3-story commercial building located on the east side of Faraday A venue in Carlsbad, California (see Vicinity Map, Figure 1). The pm:pose of this study was to evaluate the surface and subsurface soil and geologic conditions and to review the geotechnical information presented in previous site investigations. The scope of the investigation included a review of the following: • • • • Revised Conceptual (1" = 30') Site Plan prepared by Partners Planning and Engineering, dated September 6, 2000. Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 102, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geotechnics Incorporated, dated June 19, 1998. As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Carlsbad Research Center, Unit 5, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geotechnics Incorporated, dated April 29, 1994 . Grading Plans for Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24, Carlsbad Research Center, Unit 5, Sheet 3, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Rick Engineering Company, signed May 1, 1991. The field investigation was conducted on September 11, 2000, and consisted of a site reconnaissance by an engineering geologist and excavations of 4 large-diameter exploratory borings. Details of this field study as well as descriptive boring logs are presented in Appendix A. Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples obtained during the field investigation to evaluate pertinent physical properties of the soil conditions encountered. Details of the laboratory tests and a summary of the test results are presented in Appendix B. The approximate locations of the exploratory borings for this site are depicted on the Geologic Map (Figure 2). Geologic cross-sections are presented on Figure 3. The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are based on our analysis of this investigation, a review of the referenced documents, and our experience with similar soil and geologic conditions. Project No. 06585-12-0 I -l -October 4, 2000 l ] l 1 J l f J. I I J l J 2. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The irregular-shaped site is located west of Faraday A venue in the City of Carlsbad, California. A commercial building with associated parking lot borders the site to the north. The natural terrain rises immediately east of Lot 102. An east-west-trending paved access road separates the proposed building pad to the north from a large detention basin on the south. The detention basin area is included in Lot 102 on the preliminary site plan and grading plans. However, this area was not included in our investigation. The topography of the building pad area yari~s fyom a high of approximately Elevation 144 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) at the toe of the natural slope along the northeast margin to a low of about Elevation 136 feet MSL within the southwest comer. The site generally drains to the southwest into a desilting basin located in the southwest corner of the northern portion of the lot. At the time of our investigation, a small amount of construction debris was observed on the northeast comer of the property and a small pile of mulch was observed in the southeast comer adjacent to the paved access road. Site vegetation generally consists of light grasses and weeds in the building pad area. 3. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Two surficial soil types and two geologic formations were encountered during the investigation. The surficial deposits consist of compacted fill and alluvium. The formational units include Eocene-aged Santiago Formation and Santiago Peak Metavolcanics. Each of the surficial soil types and representative geologic units encountered are described below in order of increasing age. 3.1 Fill (Qaf) Previously placed fill was observed in all borings consisting of silty sand and a silty-clayey sand with some gravel. Minor amounts of organic material were encountered in some borings. The fill soils were placed during mass grading for Carlsbad Research Center during the period of October 1992 to March 1994. These fills were tested and observed by Geotechnics Incorporated. During the grading operations, the underlying alluvial soils were removed and recompacted with the exception of the southwest comer of Lot 102, where total removal of alluvial soils was not practical due to the presence of groundwater. The fill soils were encountered in all borings with various thiclrnesses. Boring Nos. 2 and 4 encountered refusal on very hard rock. Due to the possible presence ofrock-fill and/or large boulders used as fill, it was not possible to evaluate the actual base of fill. Geologic Cross-Sections A-A' and B-B' (Figure 3) show our interpretation of fill thickness with the building pad area. Our visual observation of the fill soils within the borings and laboratory testing indicates that the fill can be classified as medium dense and moist. However, isolated lenses of relatively less dense and Project No. 06585-12-0 I -2 -October 4, 2000 .\ -] 1 l ] l l ) l J l l 1 J i l '- drier soils were encountered within the boring. These isolated lenses should not have a significant adverse impact on the performance of the fill. The compacted fill is considered suitable for receiving additional fill or structures. A review of the sheet-grading plans indicates that a canyon subdrain was installed within the western portion of the site, traversing north-to-south which drains into the existing drainage to the south. 3.2 Alluvium (Qal) Soils of alluvial origin were observed in boring B-1 and underlie compacted fill in the southwest comer of Lot 102. The alluvial soils generally consist of moderately dense, saturated, dark brown, clayey sand. The alluvial soils in this area were left in place during the grading operation, due to the presence of groundwater. It is our understanding that after completion of grading, this area was monitored for settlement. A settlement of approximately 5 inches has been reported. The area underlain by the alluvial soils may still be subject to additional settlement due to the increased vertical loading. 3.3 Santiago Formation (Ts) The Eocene-aged Santiago Formation, consisting of dense, massive, white to light green silty fine to coarse sandstones and hard, greenish gray to brown claystones and siltstones outcrops on the natural slope directly east of the subject site. These materials are considered suitable for receiving additional fill or settlement-sensitive structures. 3.4 Santiago Peaks Metavolcanics {Jsp) The Jurassic-aged Santiago Peak Metavolcanics consists of volcanic and metavolcanic rocks of variable composition. This unit appears light gray to brown, highly fractured and weathered, and outcrops to the northeast of the building pad. The materials could have been exposed at the base of the fill. 4. GROUNDWATER Perched groundwater was encountered during the geotechnical investigation in exploratory boring B-1 at a depth of 32 feet below existing pad grade. A canyon subdrain has been installed at the bottom of the fill, and drains to the drainage feature south of the building pad. Due to the proximity of Boring B-1 to the subdrain and saturation of the lower portion of the fill, we suspect that the drain is not operating properly. We recommend that the subdrain outlet be checked. Proper function of the subdrain is crucial to the performance of fill. Project No. 06585-12-0 I -3 -October 4, 2000 ' ~ '1 1 l J l 7 l I J I l T l j l I f l ' 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 5.1 Faulting and Seismicity No active or potentially active faults are Imown to exist at the site. The active Rose Canyon Fault lies approximately 6 miles west of the site. The closest Imown active faults within 62 miles (100 kilometers) of the site and associated maximum probable and maximum credible earthquakes and site accelerations are indicated in Table 5.1 below. The listed peak site accelerations were calculated using the attenuation relationships of Geomatrix (1994) for sites underlain by soil. TABLE 5.1 DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS FOR SELECTED FAUL TS* Maximum Credible Maximum Probable Distance Fault from Site Earthquake Peak Earthquake Site (miles) Acceleration Acceleration (Mag.) (g) (Mag.) (g). Rose Canyon 6 6.9 0.33 5.7 0.17 Newport-Inglewood (offshore) 8 6.9 0.27 5.8 0.14 Coronado Bank 22 7.4 0.16 6.3 0.08 Elsinore-Julian 24 7.1 0.13 6.4 0.08 Elsinore-Temecula 24 6.8 0.10 6.3 0.07 Elsinore-Glen Ivy 35 6.8 0.06 6.3 0.04 San Jacinto-Anza 46 7.2 0.06 6.9 0.05 San Jacinto-San Jacinto Valley 47 6.9 0.05 6.8 0.04 *EQ Fault Computer Program, Blake, 1997. It is our opinion that the site could be subjected to moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake along any of the above-mentioned faults, however, the seismic risk at the site is not considered to be significantly different than that of the surrounding developments of similar geologic setting in the Carlsbad area. While listing of peak accelerations is useful for comparison of potential effects of fault activity in a region, other considerations are important in seismic design, including the frequency and duration of motion and the soil conditions underlying the site. We recommend that seismic design of the structures be performed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) guidelines currently adopted by the City of Carlsbad. 5.2 Liquefaction The potential for liquefaction during a strong earthquake is limited to cohesionless soils, which are in a relatively loose, unconsolidated condition and located below the groundwater level. Due to the Project No. 06585-12-0 I -4 -October 4, 2000 <, ] ·1 l J l l 7 \ I ' -·1 .J l l 1 t j I 1 t I dense nature of the formational units and relatively dense fill and alluvial soils, and lack of near- surface permanent groundwater table, the potential for seismically included soil liquefaction occurring at the site is considered to be low. 5.3 Landslides No evidence of landslides was observed during the site reconnaissance nor encountered in the exploratory excavations within the property. Project No. 06585-12-0 I -5 -October 4, 2000 ~ 1 1 l ] t l • .l I f r .! j 6.1 6.Ll 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.3 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General No soil or geologic conditions were encountered during the investigation performed by Geocon, Incorporated or those previous studies referenced that would preclude the development of the property as presently planned, provided the recommendations of this report are followed. Groundwater Grading within the balance of the site should not be affected by groundwater. Perched groundwater was encountered in Boring No. B-1 within the lower portion of the fill. The canyon subdrain located within the western portion of the building pad should be able to reduce the potential for groundwater buildup within the fill. The performance of the subdrain should be evaluated and should be maintained on a regular basis. We understand that the grading at the site will be limited to a maximum of 4 feet of cut or fill. In addition, the upper 2 feet of the existing fill is dry and desiccation cracks are evident. We recommend that this zone be moisture-conditioned and recompacted prior to receiving fill or structures. Soil Excavation Characteristics 6.3.l Based on field observations and laboratory tests, the prevailing soils are anticipated to vary from "low" expansive sandy soils to "medium" to "high" expansive clayey sands. 6.3.2 6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 Excavation of the on-site surficial units should be possible with moderate effort with conventional heavy-duty equipment. Grading All grading should be performed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad grading ordinance and the Recommended Grading Specifications contained in Appendix C. Where the recommendations of Appendix C conflict with this section of the report, the recommendations of this section shall take precedence. Prior to commencing grading a pre-construction conference should be held at the site with the grading contractor, civil engineer and geotechnical engineer in attendance. Specified soil handling and/or the grading plans can be discussed at that time. Project No. 06585-12-01 -6 -October 4, 2000 l ] .J I l j l 1 l J. t 1 6.4.3 6.4.4 6.5 6.5.1 Site preparation should begin with the removal of all deleterious material and vegetation. The upper 2 feet of_ the existing fill should be removed and/or scarified, moisture_ conditioned, and recompacted to 90% of maximum density. Material generated from stripping should be exported from the site. The site should then be brought to final subgrade elevations with structural fill compacted in layers. In general, soils present on site are suitable for re-use as fill if free from vegetation, debris and other deleterious material. Layers of fill should be no thicker than will allow for adequate bonding and compaction. Backfill and scarified ground surfaces, should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density at approximately 2 percent over optimum moisture content, as determined in accordance with ASTM test procedure D 1557-91. Fill materials drier than 2 percent above optimum moisture content may require additional moisture conditioning prior to placing additional fill at the discretion of the Geotechnical Engineer. Settlement Due to the increase of vertical loading, the existing fill and underlying alluvium will be subject to additional settlement. The total settlement of the fill, except for the southwest corner of the proposed building is estimated to be approximately 2 inches for an additional 4 feet on new fill. The estimated differential settlement is estimated to be approximately 1 inch in 100 feet. The total and differential settlement for the southwest corner is estimated to be 3 and 2 inches, respectively. The portion of the building influenced by the alluvium left in place is shown on the Geologic Map (Figure 2). 6.6 Slope Stability 6.6.1 6.6.2 6.7 6.7.1 The existing cut and fill slopes with incliI1ation of 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter are stable against deep-seated failures. No significant cut or fill slope is anticipated for the new phase of grading. All slopes should be planted, drained and properly maintained to reduce erosion. Foundations We understand that foundations for the proposed three-story buildings will consist of continuous strip footings and/or isolated spread footings. Continuous footings should be at least 24 inches wide and extend at least 36 inches below adjacent pad grade (bottom of sand blanket). Isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of 2 feet and should Project No. 06585-12-01 -7 -October 4, 2000 l l 1 l l 1 J I l I j . -' l . .: l l 1 . ,J j l extend at least 36 inches below adjacent pad grade. Steel reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of at least four No. 5 steel reinforcing bars placed horizontally in the footings, two near the top and two near the bottom. Steel reinforcement for the spread footings should be designed by the project structural engineer. 6.7.2 ... }'he minimum reinforcement recommended above is based on soil characteristics only and is not intended to replace reinforcement required for structural considerations. 6.7.3 6.7.4 6.7.5 6.8 6.8.1 6.8.2 6.8.3 The recommended allowable bearing capacity for foundations bearing in compacted fill materials is 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). The values presented above are for dead plus live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering transient loads due to wind or seismic forces. The bearing pressure may be increased by 400 psf and 300 psf for each additional foot of foundation depth or width, respectively, to a maximum of 5,000 psf. Foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of Geocon Incorporated prior to the placement of reinforcing steel and concrete to observe that the exposed soil conditions are consistent with those anticipated. If anticipated soil conditions are encountered, foundation modifications may be required. Footings located within 7 feet of the top of slopes are not recommended. However, footings that must be located within this zone should be extended in depth such that the outer bottom edge of the footings is at least 7 feet horizontally inside the face of the slope. Concrete Slabs-on-Grade Concrete slabs-on-grade not subjected to vehicular traffic should have a m1mmum thickness of 6 inches and be reinforced with No. 3 bars placed at 18-inches on center in both directions. The slab should be underlain by at least 4 inches of clean sand and, where moisture-sensitive floor coverings are planned, a visqueen moisture barrier should also be placed at the midpoint of the sand blanket. In the event heavy or concentrated loads are anticipated for the concrete slab, the project structural engineer should provide design criteria for slab thickness and reinforcing. No special subgrade presaturation is deemed necessary prior to placing concrete, however, the exposed foundation and slab subgrade soils should be moistened as necessary to maintain a moist condition as would be expected in any such concrete placement. If, after completion of grading, the finish grade soils possess an Expansion Index between 50 and 90, we recommended that all exterior concrete flatwork with a least dimension Project No. 06585-12-0 I • 8 -October 4, 2000 l l ] . --. -· 1 l I J l l j f l 1 ; _) 1 & ' J t _r 6.8.4 6.8.5 6.8.6 6.9 6.9.1 exceeding 8 feet be reinforced with No. 3 bars at 24-inch on-center in both directions to reduce the potential for cracking. In addition, all concrete flatwork should be provided with crack control joints at a maximum spacing of 12 feet. For areas with Expansion Indices exceeding 90, the edge of the exterior concrete flatwork should be thickened (shovel footing), to reduce the potential for moisture migration underneath the slab. All subgrade soils should be properly moisture conditioned prior to concrete placement. Where drying has occurred, reconditioning of surficial soils will be required. This recommendation applies to slabs-on-grade foundations as well as exterior flat work. The recommendations of this report are intended to reduce the potential for cracking of slabs due to expansive soils (if present), differential settlement of deep fills or fills of varying thicknesses. However, even with the incorporation of the recommendations presented herein, foundations, stucco walls, and slabs-on-grade placed on such conditions may still exhibit some cracking due to soil movement and/or shrinkage. The occurrence of concrete shrinkage cracks is independent of the supporting soil characteristics. Their occurrence may be reduced and/or controlled by limiting the slump of the concrete, proper concrete placement and curing, and by the placement of crack control joints at periodic intervals, in particular, where re-entrant slab corners occur. Seismic Design Parameters -The following table summarizes site design criteria obtained from the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The values listed in Table 6.9 are for the Rose Canyon Fault, which is identified as a Type B fault and is more dominant than the nearest type A fault due to its close proximity to the site. The Rose Canyon Fault is located approximately 6 miles southwest of the site. TABLE 6.9 SITE DESIGN CRITERIA Parameter Value UBC Reference Seismic Zone Factor 0.40 Table 16-I Soil Profile So Table 16-J Seismic Coefficient, Ca 0.44 Table 16-Q Seismic Coefficient, Cv 0.66 Table 16-R Near-Source Factor, Na 1.0 Table 16-S Near-Source Factor, Nv 1.0 Table 16-T Seismic Source B Table 16-U Project No. 06585-12-01 -9 -October 4, 2000 J l ] l 1 1 l ! _, _] f r i 6.10 6.10.1 Retaining Walls and Lateral Loads Retaining walls not restrained at the top and having a level backfill surface should be designed for an active soil pressure equivalent to the pressure exerted by a fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Where the backfill will be inclined at no steeper than 2: 1 (horizontal.:vertical), an active soil pressure of 45 pcf is recommended. These soil pressures assume that the backfill materials within an area bounded by the wall and a 1: 1 ·plane·· extending upward from the base of the wall possess an Expansion Index of less than 50. For those lots with finish grade soils having an Expansion Index greater than 50 and/or where backfill materials do not conform to the above criteria, Geocon Incorporated should . . . be consulted for additional recommendations. 6.10.2 Unrestrained walls are those that are allowed to rotate more than 0.001H at the top of the wall. Where walls are restrained from movement at the top, an additional uniform pressure of 7H psf (where H equals the height of the retaining wall portion of the wall in feet) should be added to the above active soil pressure. 6.10.3 All retaining walls should be provided with a drainage system adequate to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic fore.es and should be waterproofed as required by the project architect. The use of drainage openings through the base of the wall (weep holes, etc.) is not recommended where the seepage could be a nuisance or otherwise adversely impact the property adjacent to the base of the wall. The above recommendations assume a properly compacted granular (Expansion Index less than 50) backfill material with no hydrostatic forces or imposed surcharge load. If conditions different than those described are anticipated, or if specific drainage details are desired, Geocon Incorporated should be contacted for additional recommendations. 6.10.4 In general, wall foundations having a minimum depth and width of one foot may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf, provided the soil within 3 feet below the base of the wall has an Expansion Index of less than 90. The proximity of the foundation to the top of a slope steeper than 3:1 could impact the allowable soil bearing pressure. Therefore, Geocon Incorporated should be consulted where such a condition is anticipated. The location of wall footings, however, should comply with the recommendations presented in Section 6. 7.5. 6.10.5 For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable passive earth pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 300 pcf is recommended for footings or shear keys poured neat against properly compacted granular fill soils or undisturbed natural soils. The allowable passive pressure assumes a horizontal surface e~tending at least 5 feet or three times the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever is greater. The upper 12 inches of material not protected by Project No. 06585-12-01 -10 -October 4, 2000 1 l "") I 1 j 1 l 1 j l I I ·-' 1 J J floor slabs or pavement should not be included in the design for lateral resistance. An allowable :friction coefficient of 0.4 may be used for resistance to sliding between soil and concrete. This :friction coefficient may be combined with the allowable passive earth pressure when determining resistance to lateral loads. 6.10.6 Jbe reco~endations presented above are generally applicable to the design -~f rigid concrete or masonry retaining walls having a maximum height of 8 feet. In the event that walls higher than 8 feet ·or other types of walls are planned, such as crib-type walls, Geocon Incorporated should be consulted for additional recommendations. 6.11 Slope Maintenance 6.11.1 6.12 6.12.l Slopes that are steeper than 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) may, under conditions that are both difficult ~o prevent and predict, be susceptible to near surface (surficial) slope instability. The instability is typically limited to the outer three feet of a portion of the slope and usually does not directly impact the improvements on the pad areas above or below the slope. The occurrence of surficial instability is more prevalent on fill slopes and is generally preceded by a period of heavy rainfall, excessive irrigation, or the migration of subsurface seepage. The disturbance and/or loosening of the surficial soils, as might result from root growth, soil expansion, or excavation for irrigation lines and slope planting, may also be a significant contributing factor to surficial instability. It is, therefore, recom- mended that, to the maximum extent practical: (a) disturbed/loosened surficial soils be either removed or properly recompacted, (b) irrigation systems be periodically inspected and maintained to eliminate leaks and excessive irrigation, and ( c) surface drains on and adjacen(to slopes be periodically maintained to preclude ponding or erosion. It should be noted that although the incorporation of the above recommendations should reduce the potential for surficial slope instability, it will not eliminate the possibility, and, therefore, it may be necessary to rebuild or repair a portion of the proj ect1s slopes in the future. Drainage Establishing proper drainage is imperative to reduce the potential for differential soil movement, erosion and subsurface seepage. Positive measures should be taken to properly finish grade the building pads after structures and other improvements are in place, so that drainage water from the building pads and adjacent properties is directed to streets away from foundations and tops of slopes. Experience has shown that even with these provisions, a shallow groundwater or subsurface condition can and may develop in areas where no such condition existed prior to site development. This is particularly true where a Project No. 06585-12-01 -11 -October -1, 2000 "' 1 l I l 1 1 -. I I 1 J l l j • l l l ' j ' j _J l I !I 'i t } , l 6.13 6.13.1 substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from an increase in landscape irrigation. Plan Review The geotechnical engineer and engineering geologist should review the grading and -foundation plans prior to finalization to verify their compliance with the recommendations of this report and determine the necessity for additional comments, recommendations and/or analysis. Project No. 06585-12-01 -12 -October 4, 2000 l 1 1 1 _l ·, \ l } l ! / l- 1 ·-' 1 l 1 l f J 1. 2. 3. LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction :will _differ from that anticipated herein, Geocon Incorporated should be notified so that supple1:1ental recommendations can be given. The evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous or corrosive materials was not part of the scope of services provided by Geocort Incorporated. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property cart occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. Project No. 06585-12-0 I October 4, 2000 1 1 l ] i _j ! I ....J I { j t " llllrf!lfY,'ll[flifl ·, I I ~ SOURCE : 2000 THOMAS BROTHERS MAP SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION GRANTED BY THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS. THIS MAP IS COPYRIGHTED BY THOMAS BROS. MAPS. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO COPY OR REPRODUCE ALL OR ANY PART THEREOF. WHETHER FOR PERSONAL use OR RESALE. WITHOUT PERMISSION GEOCON INCORPORATED 0 GEO TECHNICAL CONSULT ANTS 6960 FLAND:RS DRIVE · SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121·2974 PHONE 858 558-6900 FAX 858 558-6159 AS/ JMW I I OSK/ EOOOO X/R14/1DRAFTING/JIMW/101/CRCLOT2 / / ' '- -------·---·-·-.__..,_ _______ / ---·-·· ,. \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ I \. I , _t - "\ I I I _J .,,------...... I I I I ·---. C/4RLSB -----'-1 I I i --1 ------\ I ,,,..,,;-'· ·,\··--""/ :,'+' ·.v \..~.,,,,..,, ......... C).V.~:-..,,, U CVSTA ) COOHTRY ) CLUB + I ~ I ,_,.. NO SCALE VICINITY MAP -- CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DATE I PROJECT NO. 06585 -12 -01 I FIG. 1 A 140' - 130' - 120·-· 110',.. 100'- 9Q'- 80'- 140'-: 130'- 120'- 110' - 100'- 6585MM CARLSBAD RESEARCH SAN DIEGO, ,-------PROPOSED STRUCTURE ---' u.i ~·ct It '>, -~ ~-Lt Qaf Qaf APPROX. LOCATION OF . · · SUBDRAIN ~ -----~~----....... ----...... --....... -...... , -~L ? ------""'----. ..;;;.,-----?----- Ts? ,,? Qal "' · Ts · '"-_,/ · Ts:? I<-------PROPOSED STRUCTURE -- B-4 Qaf . Qaf -.---?-------~--------~--?------~~------?---- APPROX. LOCATION OF Ts/Jsp? . SUBDRAfN ·LEGEND Qaf. ...... FILL Qal. ..... ALLUVIUM Ts ....... SANTIAG0 FORMATION Jsp ....... SANTIAGO PEAK METAVOLCANICS SCALE; 1" = 30' (HORIZ. = V ' ~! 11 ~r-E_N_T-ER ___ L_O_T_1_0_2 ____________ __,,_ __ ___ ~LIFORNIA I EXISTING GROUND SURFACE B-2 A' 160' 150' 140' Qaf Qaf Ts 130' 120' 110' ----------·?·------- 100' Ts/Jsp? 90' 80' B' B-3 rEXISTING GROUND SURFACE Qaf .. ?---------------------------------- 160' 150' 140' -------------?---------· ---------------. Ts {T.) CROSS-SECTIONS A-A' AND B-B' GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 130' 120' 110' 100' 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE· SANDIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121·297'4 PHONE 858 558-6900 • FAX 858 558-6159 PROJECT NO. 06585 -12 -01 FIGURE 3 DATE 10-04-2000 ~. 1.' .J . . : :_ >·~: ._ J I..' •• --~·· .. ;"•• ,, .. ~~ ,::,._·, : .... · 1'• •. ·-·. .-. ; ~- . -.: ·~- ···:, : ~·-: ~~:~- • 1 ··,;. ._._ .. , .... •• <. l l ] I l ·1 J 1 I J 1 1 l I _J i j t 1 1 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on September 11, 2000, and consisted of a site reconnaissance and the excavation of 4 large-diameter borings. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations are shown on Figure 2. The large-diameter borings were advanced to depths ranging from 14 to 48 feet below existing grade using an E-100 truck-mounted drill rig eq_u~pped with a 30-inch-diameter bucket auger. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained by driving a 3-inch split tube sampler 12 inches into the undisturbed soil mass with the drill rig kelly bar. The sampler was equipped with 25/s-inch brass sampler rings to facilitate removal and laboratory testing. Disturbed bulk samples were obtained at selected locations in the exploratory borings. In addition, the borings were downhole-logged to evaluate existing soil conditions. The soils encountered in the exploratory borings were visually examined, classified, and logged. Logs of the borings are presented on Figures A-1 through A-4. The logs depict the soil and geologic conditions encountered. Project No. 06585-12-0l October 4, 2000 ,, l l ] ·l I l I 1 j ! 1 1 l j • .J 1 .! l J 1 J PROJECT NO. 06585-12-01 DEPTH IN FEET 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 26 28 30 SAMPLE NO. Bl-1 Bl-2 B1-3 B1-4 B1-5 Bl-b B1-7 B1-8 >-(.!) 0 _J 0 ::i:: .... H _J 0:: lJ.J .... i SOIL Cl CLASS (USCS) z :::::) 0 0:: (.!) SC SM-SC BORING B 1 ELEV. (MSL.) 136 DATE COMPLETED ----- EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FILL Loose, moist, brownish-yellow, Clayey, fine to medium SAND with subangular gravel to 4", interbedded with brown to black sandy clay -Becomes medium dense at 2 feet Medium dense, moist, dark grayish-brown, Silty, Clayey SAND with little gravel -Roots, pieces of wood -Layer of dry to damp, light brown, Silty SAND, gravel from 13 to 14 feet -Layer of light green, pale Silty SAND from 19 to 20 feet -Becomes more gravelly -A fractured boulder at 22 feet 9/11/00 1/12" 108.4 13.4 1/12" 1/12" 112.6 11.6 2/12" 114.5 10.6 2/12" 2/12" 111.9 2/12" 104.7 22.0 Figure A-1, Log of Boring B 1 CRC1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL ~ ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST •... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) i:J ... CHUNK SAMPLE J ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. ~ 1 1 1 J 1 l I l _! i 1 PROJECT NO. DEPTH SAMPLE IN NO. FEET ,_ 32 -- 1-34 -Bl-9 --Bl-10 -36 - -- -38 - -- 1-40 -Bl-11 -- -42 - -- -44 - ,-- -46 - -- Bl-12 -48 06585-12-01 ~ BORING B 1 >-1.IJ C.!) I-0 <I: ...J 3 SOIL 0 Cl :::c z CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 136 DATE COMPLETED I-::, (USCS) H 0 ...J 0:: EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG C.!) IY· MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ;t1 --Becomes wet to saturated c>/·1/-ALLUVIUM -// v.// Medium dense, saturated, dark brown, Clayey SAND, :;:// organic odor;_cavi~g_frpm 34 feet //. /// ///. rr//. V-7"' 1~,(} SC ('// ~/-/ /f /. _/ /./j -Water at 44 feet, caving before backfill (/.,,, r'// Severe caving ,// .// 1r:1j BORING TERMINATED AT 48 FEET - Figure A-2, Log of Boring B 1 Zw'"' >-'"' Ou • s~ 1.IJ~ Hzl-~'-' I-<I:LL zLL ::,I-9/11/00 <I:1-' 0:: Cl) CJ) 1.IJ • 1-z I-H3 o': (J)l.lJ H1-1.IJooO >-0.. Oz Zw...J ~o::9 ~'-" :Co Cl (.) - ,- 2/12" 117.5 16.2 I- - - I- ,- 1/12" 116.0 17.1 - - - ,- - - - 1/12" 113.0 16.8 CRC1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL I] ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST •... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ~ ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ~ ... CHUNK SAMPLE Y ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1 PROJECT NO 1 l ] 1 l I l I I 1 l '- ,_ I- - ,_ '- I- '- I- ,_ ,_ ,_ '- I- - ,_ ,__ -- ,_ I- - - -- ,_ I- I- I- - ,_ I- DEPTH SAMPLE IN NO. FEET 0 - 2 - B2-1 - 4 - -B2-2 6 - - 8 - B2-3 - 10 -B2-4 - 12 - . - 14 - - B2-5 16 - - 18 - - 20 -B2-6 - 22 - - 24 - -B2-7 26 - - 28 - - 30 -B2-8 - 06585-12-01 e::: BORING B 2 >-IJ.J t!) I- 0 <I: ...I :3: SOIL .. 0 Cl :c z CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 138 DATE COMPLETED I-::) H 0 {USCS) ...I e::: EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION l:/} FILL L{;/, Loose, dry, light yellow, Clayey SAND with trace subangular gravel to 3" IL:// -Becomes medium dense, moist at 2 feet //. "/// //} -Becomes dense,_brown I!/,, ~!} //:, f.?'// ~-/f /. :/ -Small pieces of wood 1/j -Increased gravel and cobble to 5" /_;,, l/. ~/-r,;-/· ·.·/ {/;, r?'// /0 SC 1/-~;,,, L,:// l{/./ r;//-·./ lf>:, r,-,,// /f ~ / .. / ~/} l(// r.7//-·.·/ l{/;, -Becomes wet ;:-// //. '/./ -Becomes medium dense r~(} ~/" -Organic odor ;//-/ //;, / -Becomes dark brownish-yellow >·-JY /.f Medium dense, moist to wet, dark yellowish-brown, I/"// Clayey SAND Figure A-3, Log of Boring B 2 Zw'"' >-'"' Ou• @~ LIJ~ Hzl-e:::'-" I-<I:IJ... zl.l... ::)I- 9/11/00 <I: I-' llJ • 1-z 0::(1)(1) cit: (l)LIJ 1-H:3: HI-LIJ(/)0 :,..0.. Oz Zw...l ~e:::e a::'-" E:o Cl u - ..... 2/12" 117.1 9.3 I- - -2/12" 110.8 13.7 ,- I- - I- ,-. 3/12" 108.0 15.6 ,- I- - - I- 4/12" 125.8 9.8 I- - I- - ,_ 2/12" 116.2 14.0 ,-. ,-. - ,_ -1/12" 106.6 8.8 - - ,_ ,_ -2/12" 117.8 13.6 - CRC1 i j D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST •... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) SAMPLE SYMBOLS ~ ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE il ... CHUNK SAMPLE ~ ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE 1 NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE ~ DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. l l l j .. J I J l I t j i J PROJECT NO 06585-12-01 0:: BORING B 2 >-L!J zw,..._ >-,..._ (!) I-Ou • ~~ wX 0 <I: DEPTH ...J 3 SOIL Hzl-0:: '-' SAMPLE 0 C) I-<I: IJ.. zU.. :Ji- IN :::c z CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 138 DATE COMPLETED 9/11/00 <I:1-"' 1-z NO. 0:: CJ)CJ) L!J • FEET I-:::) (USCS) 1-H:3: C)~ CJ)L!J H 0 H1- ...J 0:: L!JCJ)O >-a.. Oz EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG Zw...J (!) l5:o::~ 0:: '-' :i:::o C) u MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0-32 (,1/·//-[.?· .. ,__ -. ·/ ,_ ,__ 34 -('/> ~~ c... -SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION?? .... B2-9 Moderately weathered, jointed, light gray to orange, -36 fine-grained META VOLCANIC ROCK I BORING TERMINATED AT 36-FEET REFUSAL - ,.. I Figure A-4, Log of Boring B 2 CRC1 D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST •..• DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) SAMPLE SYMBOLS ~ ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ii;;! ..• CHUNK SAMPLE ~ ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT JS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1 1 ] 1 l J J l 1 i l J 1 j PROJECT NO. 06585-12-0 I 0:: BORING B 3 >-w (.!) I-0 <I: DEPTH ...I 3 SOIL SAMPLE 0 Cl IN ::c z CLASS ELEV. (MSL.) 142 DATE COMPLETED NO. I-:::, FEET (USCS) H 0 ...I 0:: EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG (.!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -0 ///: ;,-.. FILL --. ·/ 2 v(// Loose, dry, grayish-yellow, Clayey SAND, trace silt, --Iv?-/ trace gravel B3-1 ~'/. -Becomes medium dense, moist --?/./ -4 -//}. .. . . --1{// B3-2 -6 -1!} --(:_/, ~// -Becomes dark brown -8 -·;:/. --cJ/" . -10 -//j B3-3 I{?,, SC --v//: -12 -~// .// -Layer of yellow silty sand from 12 to 13 feet --r// -14 -//. --/// B3-4 I~/}. -16 -!// --t{//- -18 -//' . // -Increase subangular gravel --~// -Wet layer /f -20 -1v.-/ -B3-5 //j -- -22 -(j,, ~!} -- -24 (/;,, -{// --I//. B3-6 v:// -26 -v(} --/j,, -28 -V-/ ",c [7/~ SC SANTIAGO FORMATION -Dense, moist, gray, Clayey SAND, some subangular gravel and cobble BORING TERMINATED AT 29 FEET .. -REFUSAL Figure A-5, Log of Boring B 3 Zw..--. >-,,.... Ou • I-.,._ wX Hzl-H. et::'"" I-<I: LL. (J)LL. =>1-9/11/00 <I: I-" z. 1-z 0:: (J)(J) Wu 1-H:3: Cl • cnw H1-WcnO >-a.. Oz Zw...l ~o::~ 0:: '-' ::E:o Cl u - - 2/12" 114.6 12.4 - --2/12" - - ---1/12" 113.6 11.5 - - >---2/12" 118.4 12.8 - ..... >- - - 2/12" 116.3 13.6 - ..... - - -2/12" -- I CRC1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS D ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL §:§ •.• DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IJ ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ••.• DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ~ •.. CHUNK SAMPLE ~ ..• WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE l NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE t DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1 l PROJECT NO 06585-12-01 1 l ] l -, l i -J 1 \ 1 -· l j 1 J i 0:: BORING B 4 >-w Zw'"' >-'"' c.!) I-Ou• J:;rs L1J...: 0 (I: DEPTH ...J 3 SOIL Hzl-Cf) • 0:: ._,, I-<I:LL IN SAMPLE 0 CJ CLASS (I: I-' zLL ::, I- NO. :::c z ELEV. (MSL.) 140 DATE COMPLETED 9/11/00 0:: Cf)(/) w· 1-z FEET I-::, (USCS) I-H3 CJ~ cnw H 0 H1- ...J 0:: L1J cnO >-a.. Oz EQUIPMENT E 100 BUCKET RIG Zw...J c.!) ~ o::e:! a:::._,, :Co CJ u MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,_ 0 \1/)-J f.l · .. FILL ... -. ·/ ,_ l{// Loose, dry, brown, Clayey SAND with some angular ~ 2 -gravel to 4" - '---~/j, -Becomes medium dense, moist, dark brown '--/. ·. -4 -v>,:/ -v/} ' - I--ti/.-' - ,_ 6 -IJ//-I- ·./ .... -{// I- SC -Small piece of plastic ~ 8 -v// .... '---/0 '-- V '/ -10 -v/ · '--. /, .... -(/-' ,_ v/1/--12 -"/./ ,_ ,_ -V// -[;,-// -Becomes dense .. '/ '--14 BORING TERMINATED AT 14 FEET BUCKET REFUSAL ON META VOLCANIC BOULDER . Figure A-6, Log of Boring B 4 CRC1 SAMPLE SYMBOLS 0 ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL I] ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST • ..• DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ~ .•. DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE i.:J ... CHUNK SAMPLE JI'.: ••• WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. : ! ~ J ~-~"~?'>·~··~--/-~ ·e"' -~·, .. ,,,.~ ia---:,.r~"~~_;~ ,. --:.-;< ~ ... ,-.,;-,·,e, ,-,,.'fi,l,,-.;f,-•~·,.,, , .. _,,. --· ,o~ol',.'tio.-,i-1' · ,...,_., "''1: .J-v,:;,.-· •. , -'· ,-~ ... · • o -·~ .,. .... -:;., ......... J_. J l J . ·-.. -. ,.. .. -·-;-:-. ··• _: . . -~-~ . . . ,·_:·::·- ., ,,r • .~ .: r .-• •' ., .. , ... -'· :--~ '• .. -! •• ~ -~·. ·-·. • ,. • < • ' ··;. ·-.:\,} .• :> .... ' : ~-·:,; ... j ,,. ' ··" 1 l ] l 7 ' ' l l 1 -~ 1 l I l --' f • J l l i -! ' 1 l APPENDIX 8 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other suggested procedures. Selected soil samples were tested for their in-place dry density and moisture content, and consolidation characteristics. The results of our laboratory tests are presented in Table B-I through B-III. The in-place density and moisture test results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. TABLE 8-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RES UL TS ASTM D 1557 Sample Description Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture No. Density (pcf) Content (% dry wt.) Bl-1 Light olive-brown, fine to medium, Silty, CLAY 122.2 10.9 B2-3 Dark olive-brown, Clayey, fine to medium SAND, with trace gravel 126.8 10.3 TABLE 8-11 SUMMARY OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST RES UL TS Sample No. Dry Density Moisture Content Unit Cohesion Angle of Shear (pcf) (%) (psf) Resistance (degrees) Bl-3 113.3 12.1 474 31 B3-2 113.5 11.8 308 29 TABLE 8-111 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS Sample Moisture Content Dry Density Expansion No. Before Test(%) After Test (%) (pcf) Index Bl-1 9.2* 27.2 113.6 68 B2-3 9.2 20.9 112.8 35 * Sample allowed to air-dry from as-received moisture content. Project No. 06585-12-01 October 4, 2000 ' 1 1 l 1 l 7 l J 1 1 l J 1 j PROJECT NO. 06585-12-01 SAMPLE NO. Bl-4 -4 -2 ' -0 ---.. ~~ ~ z 0 2 ", H I-~ <I: Cl ~ H I\ ....I 0 (/) 4 \ z ', 0 u ..... .... .... ..... i\ I-r----z I"'--LU r--u I'-. 0:: "-- LU 6 ,.._ "' a.. --- 8 10 - 12 0.1 1 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf) Initial Dry Density (pcf) 112.6 Initial Saturation ( % ) 64.9 Initial Water Content(%) 11.6 Sample Saturated at (ksf) .5 CONSOLIDATION CURVE CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CRC1 Figure B-1 1 1 l ] l ·7 1 1 7 J l j j } PROJECT NO. 06585-12-01 SAMPLE NO. Bl-11 -4 -2 0 -----i --i,., . . .. ,., ~ z 0 2 H ~ I-~ <I: 0 I"\ H ..J 0 [\ (/) 4 z "', 0 u '\,, I-z ·~ w ~ u ~ a:: 6 -w ---'\. a.. ...... 8 10 , 12 0.1 1 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf) Initial Dry Density (pct) 116.0 Initial Saturation ( % ) 100+ Initial Water Content(%) 17.1 Sample Saturated at (ksf) .5 CONSOLIDATION CURVE CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CRC1 Figure B-2 1 l 1 1 ..., I l l j J t ' PROJECT NO. 06585-12-01 SAMPLE NO. B3-3 -4 -2 -,_,....., -0 ----~ r--i--t-" ~ z 0 2 " H I-I'-. <I: Cl t\l\ H _J 0 en 4 -' z ,..,.. I' 0 r-----.. u i\ I-i"'---,.. r---z I-. I.LI t--. u """ i,...~ 0:: I.LI 6 ~ 0.. 8 10 ,,. 12 0.1 1 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf) Initial Dry Density (pcf) 113.6 Initial Saturation ( % ) 66.1 Initial Water Content(%) 11.5 Sample Saturated at (ksf) .5 CONSOLIDATION CURVE CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CRC1 Figure B-3 l· J ,, J . ,;· . ~ l j . •.·· .. · .. ···· .. '•--f-- , .. ~·· .. ·.' \ '. /. •' •.1.' .. .' ··: ... - ·z : . '.: . ·: ... -: ', .. . :.:- ~ ·. , ... ~-... -.. · . . _ .. , .. ' ,d ... • ~' ' • "', • ~ -~ ... ::..: ·:.: ,. -,: .. ' , ~ ·., l ] J 7 l .J J l _, APPENDIX C RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS for CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 102 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 06585-12-01 1 J l ] -., ·; l J i t i I l ' i 1 1.1. 1.2. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL These Recommended Grading Specifications shall be used in conjunction with the Geotechnical Report for the project prepared by Geocon Incorporated. The recom- mendations contained in the text of the Geotechnical Report are a part of the earthwork and grading specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. Prior to the commencement of grading, a geotechnical consultant (Consultant) shall be employed for the purpose of observing earthw9rk procedures and testing the fills for substantial conformance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and these specifications. It will be necessary that the Consultant provide adequate testing and observation services so that he may determine that, in his opinion, the work was performed in substantial conformance with these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to assist the Consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes so that personnel may be scheduled accordingly. 1.3. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes or agency ordinances, these specifications and the approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable soil materials, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, advers~ weather, and so forth, result in a quality of work not in conformance with these specifications, the Consultant will be empowered to reject the work -and recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the unacceptable conditions are corrected. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1. Owner shall refer to the owner of the property or the entity on whose behalf the grading work is being performed and who has contracted with the Contractor to have grading 2.2. 2.3. performed. Contractor shall refer to the Contractor performing the site grading work. Civil Engineer or Engineer of Work shall refer to the California licensed Civil Engineer or consulting firm responsible for preparation of the grading plans, surveying and verifying as-graded topography. GI rev. 8/98 1 l 1 l -, I ·, I l J 2.4. Consultant shall refer to the soil engineering and engineering geology consulting firm retained to provide geotechnical services for the project. 2.5. 2.6. 2.7. Soil Engineer shall refer to a California licensed Civil Engineer retained by the Owner, who is experienced in the practice of geotechnical engineering. The Soil Engineer shall be responsible for having qualified representatives on-site to observe and test the Contractor's work for conformance with these specifications. Engineering Geologist shall refer to a California licensed Engineering Geologist retained by the Owner to provide geologic observations and recommendations during the site grading. Geotechnical Report shall refer to a soil report (including all addenda) which may include a geologic reconnaissance or geologic investigation that was prepared specifically for the development of the project for which these Recommended Grading Specifications are intended to apply. 3. MATERIALS 3 .1. Materials for compacted fill shall consist of any soil excavated from the cut areas or imported to the site that, in the opinion of the Consultant, is suitable for use in construction of fills. fu general, fill materials can be classified as soil fills, soil-rock fills or rock fills, as defined below. 3 .1.1. Soil fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension and containing at least 40 percent by weight of material smaller than 3/4 inch in size. 3.1.2. Soil-rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 4 feet in maximum dimension and containing a sufficient matrix of soil fill to allow for proper compaction of soil fill around the rock fragments or hard lumps as specified in Paragraph 6.2. Oversize rock is defined as material greater than 12 inches. 3.1.3. Rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 3 feet in maximum dimension and containing little or no fines. Fines are defined as material smaller than 3/4 inch in maximum dimension. The quantity of fines shall be less than approximately 20 percent of the rock fill quantity. GI rev. 8/98 ,. ] l l ] l 7 ) 7 j 1 i 1 ' l i j l 1 • 1 1 f i ! i .! 3.2. 3.3. . 3.4. 3.5. 3.6. 4.1. Material of a perishable, spongy, or otherwise unsuitable nature as determined by the Consultant shall not be used in fills. Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Articles 9 and 1 O; 40CFR; and any other applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations, the Owner shall provid~ ~ written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. The outer 15 feet of soil-rock fill slopes, measured horizontally, should be composed of properly compacted soil fill materials approved by the Consultant. Rock fill may extend to the slope face, provided that the slope is not steeper than 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) and a soil layer no thicker than 12 inches is track-walked onto the face for landscaping purposes. This procedure may be utilized, provided it is acceptable to the governing agency, Owner and Consultant. Representative samples of soil materials to be used for fill shall be tested in the laboratory by the Consultant to determine the maximum density, optimum moisture content, and, where appropriate, shear strength, expansion, and gradation characteristics of the soil. During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the Geotechn1cal Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified innnediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition 4. CLEARING AND PREPARING AREAS TO BE FILLED Areas to be excavated and filled shall be cleared and grubbed. Clearing shall consist of complete removal above the ground surface of trees, stumps, brush, vegetation, man-made structures and similar debris. Grubbing shall consist of removal of stumps, roots, buried logs and other unsuitable material and shall be performed in areas to be graded. Roots and other projections exceeding 1-1/2 inches in diameter shall be removed to a depth of 3 feet below the surface of the ground. Borrow areas shall be grubbed to the extent necessary to provide suitable fill materials. GI rev. 8/98 ,1 1 l 1 l l l I l 1 I j I l 1 \ 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. Any asphalt pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed at an approved off-site facility. Concrete fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided they are placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of this document. After clearing and grubbing of organic matter or other unsuitable material, loose or porous soils shall be removed to the depth recommended in the Geotechnical Report. The depth of removal and compaction shall be observed and approved by a representative of the Consultant. The exposed surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. Where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than 6:1 (horizontal:vertical), or where recommended by the Consultant, the original ground should be benched in accordance with the following illustration. TYPICAL BENCHING DETAIL Finish Grade Remove All Unsuitable Material As Recommended By Soil Engineer DETAIL NOTES: Slope To Be Such That Sloughing Or Sliding Does Not Occur Original Ground 2 ~1 / Finish Slope Surface Varies I ~=-----'=~-=----.-1~-i _____ ___, J I See :;te 1 See Note 2 No Scale (1) Key width "B" should be a minimum of 10 feet wide, or sufficiently wide to permit complete coverage with the compaction equipment used. The base of the key should be graded horizontal, or inclined slightly into the natural slope. (2) The outside of the bottom key should be below the topsoil or unsuitable surficial material and at least 2 feet into dense formational material. Where hard rock is exposed in the bottom of the key, the depth and configuration of the key may be modified as approved by the Consultant. GI rev. 8/98 l ] l .! I ! J ! I l 4.5. 5.1. 5.2. After areas to receive fill have been cleared, plowed or scarified, the surface should be disced or bladed by the Contractor until it is uniform and free from large clods. The area should then be moisture conditioned to achieve the proper moisture content, and compacted as recommended in Section 6.0 of these specifications. 5. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT Compaction of soil or soil-rock fill shall be accomplished by sheepsfoot or segmented-steel wheeled rollers, vibratory rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other types of acceptable compaction equipment. Equipment shall be of such a design that it will be capable of compacting the soil or-soil-rock fill to the specified relative compaction at the specified moisture content. Compaction of rock fills shall be performed in accordance with Section 6.3. 6. PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL 6.1. Soil fill, as defined in Paragraph 3 .1.1, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.1.1. Soil fill shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that, when compacted, should generally not exceed 8 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during spreading to obtain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. The entire fill shall be constructed as a unit in nearly level lifts. R,ock materials greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension shall be placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of these specifications. 6.1.2. In general, the soil fill shall be compacted at a moisture content at or above the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557-91. 6.1.3. When the moisture content of soil fill is below that specified by the Consultant, water shall be added by the Contractor until the moisture content is in the range specified. 6.1.4. When the moisture content of the soil fill is above the range specified by the Consultant or too wet to achieve proper compaction, the soil fill shall be aerated_ by the Contractor by blading/mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the range specified. GI rev. 8/98 1 l l ] 1 7 ' ] I l . .i i J ' I l ,. I i, I J j i j 6.2. 6.1.5. After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent. Relative compaction is defined as the ratio (expressed in percent) of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill to the maximum laboratory dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-91. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and compaction equipment shall make sufficient passes so that the specified minimum relative compaction has been achieved throughout the entire fill. 6.1.6. Soils having an Expansion Index of greater than 50 may be used in fills if placed at least 3 feet below finish pad grade and should be compacted at a moisture content generally 2 to 4 percent greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. 6.1.7. Properly compacted soil fill shall extend to the design surface of fill slopes. To achieve proper compaction, it is recommended that fill slopes be over-built by at least 3 feet and then cut to the design grade. This procedure is considered preferable to track-walking of slopes, as described in the following paragraph. 6.1.8. As an alternative to over-building of slopes, slope faces may be back-rolled with a heavy-duty loaded sheepsfoot or vibratory roller at maximum 4-foot fill height intervals. Upon completion, slopes should then be track-walked with a D-8 dozer or similar equipment, such that a dozer track covers all slope surfaces at least twice. Soil-rock fill, as defined in Paragraph 3 .1.2, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.2.1. Rocks larger than 12 inches but less than 4 feet in maximum dimension may be incorporated into the compacted soil fill, but shall be limited to the area measured 6.2.2. 15 feet minimum horizontally from the slope face and 5 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the deepest utility, whichever is deeper. Rocks or rock fragments up to 4 feet in maximum dimension may either be individually placed or placed in windrows. Under certain conditions, rocks or rock fragments up to 10 feet in maximum dimension may be placed using similar methods. The acceptability of placing rock materials greater than 4 feet in maximum dimension shall be evaluated during grading as specific cases arise and shall be approved by the Consultant prior to placement. GI rev. 8/98 l l ] 1 l ] 1 1 , j I I J I ~ 1 J f J I I I i 6.3. 6.2.3. For individual placement, sufficient space shall be provided between rocks to allow for passage of compaction equipment. 6.2.4. For windrow placement, the rocks should be placed m trenches excavated in properly compacted soil fill. Trenches should be approximately 5 feet wide and 4 feet deep in maximum dimension. The voids around and beneath rocks should be filled with approved granular soil having a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater and should be compacted by flooding. Windrows may also be placed utilizing an "open-face" method in lieu of the trench procedure, however, this method should first be approved by the ~onsultant. 6.2.5. Windrows should generally be parallel to each other and may be placed either parallel to or perpendicular to the face of the slope depending on the site geometry. The minimum horizontal spacing for windrows shall be 12 feet center-to-center. with a 5-foot stagger or offset from lower courses to next overlying course. The minimum vertical spacing between windrow courses shall be 2 feet from the top of a lower windrow to the bottom of the next higher windrow. 6.2.6. All rock placement, fill placement and flooding of approved granular soil in the windrows must be continuously observed by the Consultant or his representative. Rock fills, as defined in Section 3.1.3., shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.3 .1. The base of the rock fill shall be placed on a sloping surface (minimum slope of 2 percent, maximum slope of 5 percent). The surface shall slope toward suitable subdrainage outlet facilities. The rock fills shall be provided with subdrains during construction so that a hydrostatic pressure buildup does not develop. The 6.3.2. subdrains shall be permanently connected to controlled drainage facilities to control post-construction infiltration of water. Rock fills shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 3 feet. Placement shall be by rock trucks traversing previously placed lifts and dumping at the edge of the currently placed lift. Spreading of the rock fill shall be by dozer to facilitate seating of the rock. The rock fill shall be watered heavily during placement. Watering shall consist of water trucks traversing in front of the current rock lift face and spraying water continuously during rock placement. Compaction equipment with compactive energy comparable to or greater than that of a 20-ton steel vibratory roller or other compaction equipment providing suitable energy to achieve the GI rev. 8/98 . .1 l l 1 1 ] I 1 I J ' ~ . 1 l l 1 j i J t 1 1 t ! required co!Y!paction or deflection as recommended in Paragraph 6.3.3 shall be utilized. The number of passes to be made will be determined as described in Paragraph 6.3.3. Once a rock fill lift has been covered with soil fill, no additional rock fill lifts will be permitted over the soil fill. 6.3.3. Plate bearing tests, in accordance with ASTM Dl 196-64, may be performed in both the compacted soil fill and in the rock fill to aid in determining the number of passes of the compaction equipment to be performed. If performed, a minimum of three plate bearing tests shall be performed in the properly compacted soil fill (minimum relative compaction of 90 percent). Plate bearing tests shall then be performed on areas of rock fill having two passes, four passes and six passes of the compaction equipment, respectively. The number of passes required for the rock fill shall be determined by comparing the results of the plate bearing tests for the soil fill and the rock fill and by evaluating the deflection variation with number of passes. The required number of passes of the compaction equipment will be performed as necessary until the plate bearing deflections are equal to or less than that determined for the properly compacted soil fill. In no case will the required number of passes be less than two. 6.3.4. A representative of the Consultant shall be present during rock fill operations to verify that the minimum number of "passes" have been obtained, that water is being properly applied and that specified procedures are being followed. The actual number of plate bearing tests will be determined by the Consultant during grading. In general, at least one test should be performed for each approximately 5,000 to 10,000 cubic yards of rock fill placed. 6.3.5. Test pits shall be excavated by the Contractor so that the Consultant can state that, in his opinion, sufficient water is present and that voids between large rocks are 6.3.6. properly filled with smaller rock material. In-place density testing will not be required in the rock fills . To reduce the potential for "piping" of fines into the rock fill from overlying soil fill material, a 2-foot layer of graded filter material shall be placed above the uppermost lift of rock fill. The need to place graded filter material below the rock should be determined by the Consultant prior to commencing grading. The gradation of the graded filter material will be determined at the time the rock fill is being excavated. Materials typical of the rock fill should be submitted to the Consultant in a timely manner, to allow design of the graded filter prior to the commencement of rock fill placement. GI rev. 8/98 .] 1 7 J 1 l l I l J 1 i .J I 1 l l "" i 1 j j I J 7.1. 7.2. . 7,3. 7.4. 6.3.7. All. rock fill placement shall be continuously observed during placement by representatives of the Consultant. 7. OBSERVATION AND TESTING The Consultant shall be the Owners representative to observe and perform tests during clearing, grubbing, filling and compaction operations. In general, no more than 2 feet in vertical elevation of soil or soil-rock fill shall be placed without at least one field density test being performed within that interval. In addition, a minimum of one field density test shall be performed for every 2,000 ·cubic yards of soil or soil-rock fill placed and compacted. The Consultant shall perform random field density tests of the compacted soil or soil-rock fill to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the fill material is compacted as specified. Density tests shall be performed in the compacted materials below any disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that specified, the particular layer or areas represented by the test shall be reworked until the specified density has been achieved. During placement of rock fill, the Consultant shall verify that the minimum number of passes have been obtained per the criteria discussed in Section 6.3.3. The Consultant shall request the excavation of observation pits and may perform plate bearing tests on the placed rock fills. The observation pits will be excavated to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is properly seated and sufficient moisture has been applied to the material. If performed, plate bearing tests will be performed randomly on the surface of the most-recently placed lift. Plate bearing tests will be performed to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is adequately seated. The maximum deflection in the rock fill detei;mined in Section 6.3 .3 shall be less than the maximum deflection of the properly compacted soil fill. \7\01en any of the above criteria indicate that a layer of rock fill or any portion thereof is below that specified, the affected layer or area shall be reworked until the rock fill has been adequately seated and sufficient moisture applied. A settlement monitoring program designed by the Consultant may be conducted in areas of rock fill placement. The specific design of the monitoring program shall be as recommended in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of the project Geotechnical Report or in the final report of testing and observation services performed during grading. GI rev. 8/98 l l ] 1 7 J ] l l j l ~ _J J j .J I J j J 7.5. 7.6. The Consultant shall observe the placement of subdrains, to verify that the drainage devices have been placed and constructed in substantial conformance with project specifications. Testing procedures shall conform to the following Standards as appropriate: 7 .6.1. · Soil and Soil-Rock Fills: 7.6.1.1. Field Density Test, ASTM Dl556-82, Density of Soil In-Place By the Sand-Cone Method. 7 .6.1.2. Field Density Test, Nuclear Method, ASTM D2922-8 l, Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate In._Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth). 7.6.1.3. Laboratory Compaction Test, ASTM D1557-91, Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures Using 10-Pound Hammer and 18-Inch Drop. 7.6.1.4. Expansion fudex Test, Uniform Building Code Standard 29-2, Expansion Index Test. 7 .6.2. Rock Fills 7 .6.2.1. Field Plate Bearing Test, ASTM D 1196-64 (Reapproved 1977) Standard Method for Nonrepresentative Static Plate Load Tests of Soils and Flexibl? Pavement Components, For Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements. 8. PROTECTION OF WORK 8.1. During c~nstruction, the Contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. Drainage of surface water shall be controlled to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site. The 8:2. Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. Areas subjected to erosion or sedimentation shall be properly prepared in accordance with the Specifications prior to placing additional fill or structures. After completion of grading as observed and tested by the Consultant, no further excavation or filling shall be conducted except in conjunction with the services of the Consultant. GI rev. 8/98 1 l ] 1 7 ·7 J J 1 1 J 1 , l _J 1 1 1 l j 1 J 9.1. · 9.2. 9. CERTIFICATIONS AND FINAL REPORTS Upon completion of the work, Contractor shall furnish Owner a certification by the Civil Engineer stating that the lots and/or building pads are graded to within 0.1 foot vertically of elevations shown on the grading plan and that all tops and toes of slopes are within 0.5 foot horizontally of the positions shown on the grading plans. After installation of a section of subdrain, the project Civil Engineer should survey its location and prepare an as-built plan of the subdrain location. The project Civil Engineer should verify the proper outlet for the subdrains and the Contractor should ensure that the drain system is free of obstructions. The Owner is responsible for furnishing a final as-graded soil and geologic report satisfactory to the appropriate governing or accepting agencies. The as-graded report should be prepared and signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer experienced in geotechnical engineering and by a California Certified Engineering Geologist, indicating that the geotechnical aspects of the grading were performed in substantial conformance with the Specifications or approved changes to the Specifications. GI rev. 8/98 • '· •• l, ... •' ',:. -,,"~----". #- J ,;::; ;,,, . .. ,.. .>:: /' .. ·. . ,. · ... ,. . •. :I'. ·,, . ··. ·;r,·· ·~ .·. •. "' ... I• -. "' .. _:-: . . ...... ,.\. ··-:,· . ,., . ·. ·" ··-~.'.' ~-~'.. "' . • '. ~-/~. -:\.:_:·: t':-': :.~ -. {, . ... . .. ~'· ~ :, .. · .. ·· . ' ·-. ·!-: ·~ .. - . ,, l l ] l 7 I 7 J i 1 ' . l -J _ _; J 1 J j APPENDIX D BORJNGLOGSANDLABORATORYDATA GEO TECHNICAL INVEST/GA TION BY GEOTECHNICS, INCORPORATED DATED JUNE 19, 1998 • LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 1 • Logged by MAF Date: 5/19/98 11 Method of Drilling 8 Inch Diameter Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: 136 t: -UJ UJ ii:' ~ ~D a: ..J (.) D' ·1 i-UJ a:: ::E ~ e:. w UJ a:: !::. a. <: <: ~ :::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :t (/) (/) t- t-~ w ~ in (/) a. > ..J :z 0 w 0 " :::, w ::!: Jl 0 ..J 0 ID 0 ID e rown san y cay WI grave, me o me 1urn grame , ow pas 1c1 y, moist, hard. lnterbedded with brown clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, low plasticity, very moist, medium dense, Gravel is angular, 3/4 inch maximum. Gradation 11 2 Hydrometer 14 Atterberg 3 pH & Resistivity Sulfate Content J 1 4 Expansion 5 6 I ! 7 1] 8 --Gray brown clayey gravel (GM) with sand, fine to medium grained sand, gravel 9 to 1 inch diameter, low palslicity, moist, medium dense. About 40 lo 60% gravel. 1l 10 9 Gradation 11 1, 12 13 -y. 14 I j 15 ! 16 I ! --Dark gray brown clayey sand {SC) with gravel lo 314"o1ameter, low plasbc1\y, ··--- 17 moist, loose to medium dense. Approximately 40 percent gravel. 18 ~ 19 ' 20 9 Same. i 21 22 JI I i ·J 23 l l! 24 r l 25 ' 11 102 21 Same. Unit Weight ' 26 Moisture Content 1 27 t J s-Brown clayey sand {SC), fine to medium grained, high plashc1ty, mo,st, f'-medium dense. Contains some gravel and few wood fragments. J-29 -~ 30 PROJECT NO, 0447-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-1 i 17 l] l 1 1 1 j l i j LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 1 (Cont.) Logged by MAF Date: 5/19/98 Method of Drilling 8 Inch Diameter Hollow Stern Auger Elevation: 136 ~ t: w w u:-,o ..I ..I (.) .. w :1.. a. w w 0: :a :a e:. w 0: !:!:. a. < < ~ ::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS ::i:: V) V) I- I-~ w ~ in Cl) C. > ..J z 0 I w 0 ii: :, w :B 0 ..J m C ID 0 1/ i lUU 19 .t.U,J.: ljrown cIayey sana \::.vJ, 111Ie 10 meaIu111 gramea, mgn pIasuc11y cIays, moIsl, Unrt Weight 31 medium dense. Contains some gravel and few wood fragments. Moisture Content 32 33 34 35 161 101 22 Same. Unit Weight 36 Moisture Content 37 -38 .. vu1M Iua11: ~ray cIayey sane (::il,;), tme to meaIurn grameo, 39 low plasticity, saturated, medium dense to dense. 40 29 i 108 19 Consolidation 41 42 43 44 45 37 -114 16 Same. Dense. Consolidation 46 I 47 48 Brown clayey sand (SC), !me to medium grained, low plast,c,ty, saturated, dense-:-- 49 50 32 51 52 :,-.1• ,.n 1-1 1-l-lUI.U. )l_ IN : LIQIII reo ,at cIaystone \l,,;nJ, rngn pIasuc11y, 53 dry to moist, very hard. - 54 55 87 I Gradation 56 57 Total Depth= 56 Feet Groundwater @ 38 Feet 58 Caving to 47 Feet Backfilled 5/19/98 59 60 PROJECT NO. 0447-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-2 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 2 Logged by MAF Date: 5/19/98 ~1 Method of Drilling 8 Inch Diameter Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: 139 t;: w w G:' \ r=-~ ) ..J ..J (,) . w 0:: 0. 0. w -l w w :: ~ !::. 0:: !!:. 0. < < ~ :::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :i:: fl) UJ UJ I-I-~ w ~ UJ UJ 0. > ..I z 0 w 0 ii: :::, w :i ..J C m 0 m C l e ow rown c ayey san , me o me ,urn grame , ow pas 1c1 y, moist, medium dense. Contains layers of olive gray sandy clay (CL), low plasticity, moist, hard. Gradation ] 2 Hydrometer 26 Atterberg 3 Sulfate Expansion 1 4 5 46 118 12 Same. Direct Shear 7 6 I I 7 ' 8 1-9 10 l 21 Same. 11 12 -1 13 --14 I 15 J 16 17 18 a: rown c ayey san s one , me o meo1urn 19 grained, low plasticity, dry to moist, very dense. 20 i 80 I 21 (8") _J 22 Total Depth = 21 Feel j No Groundwater 23 No Caving Backfilled 5/19/98 24 J 25 j 26 l t 27 .. 28 i~ ..1 29 30 l l PROJECT NO. 0447-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-3 f 1 It 1 1 ,, --) >-1 · 7 ] 1 l I J l 1 ~ -----.' .J j J J J I .. -·-- LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 3 Logged by MAF Date: 5/19/98 Method of Drilling 8 Inch Diameter Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: 143 i=' Ii: UJ w G:' :,,!? -' -' (.) D w er:: a. a. w :E :E !::. w w er:: !:. a. ct < 1:: ::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :I: ~ U) r/) I- I-w ~ in r/) a. > -' z 0 ~ w 0 2 ::, w :E 0 ..J 0 ID 0 ID 11:.1.bJ.: crown c,ayey sanu \.:>vJ, une lo meo1um gramea, 10w p,as11c11y, mo1s1, 1 medium dense. 2 .. 35 115 10 Unit Weight 3 Moisture Content 4 5 17 Same. .. 6 7 8 9 10 28 Same. 11 l~ "'"'-N 11" ,~, '"' m,u,1.1 111_,,~ 11 Sa 1: cfOWll Clayey SallOSlOJle \~\..), llne \0 meulUln grained, low plasticity, dry to moist, dense. Some groundwater stains. · 13 Moderately weathered. 14 15 31 16 I 1 l Total Depth= 16½ Feet 18 No Groundwater No Caving 19 Backfilled 5/19/98 20 21 22 23 . 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PROJECT NO. 0447-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-4 • • 1 ·-) .. l 7 ] I 7 I l J 1 \ ._., I j J 1 tt -J J LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 4 Logged by MAF Date: 5/19/98 Method of Drilling 8 Inch Diameter Hollow Stem Auger Elevation: 140 r= ti: w l1J ii:' -.o ..l ..l t,) o• l1J C: Q. Q. w w w ~ ~ e:. C: !:. 0. < < ~ :::, DESCRIPTION LAB TESTS :I: en rn rn I- I-== w ::.::: er., en 0. > ..J :z 5 ' w 0 a: :::, w ~ ..J 0 Cll 0 m 0 1.t::J.L..'-; neu crown c,ayey sanu l"'"'I, 11ne 10 mearum grarnea, row p,as,1c11y, 1 moist, medium dense to dense. Contains layers of olive gray sandy clay (CL), low plasticity, moist, hard. R-Value 2 26 3 4 5 37 Same. 6 7 8 9 10 31 Same. 11 1l Total Depth= 11½ Feet 13 No Groundwater No Caving 14 Backfilled 5/19/98 15 16 17 I 18 19 20 21 22 . 23 - 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PROJECT NO. 0447-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: 8-5 .. • l ] 7 -1 J l l l J l l J l J j 1 ~ ~ C > ·-< ·: ~ m :z C m .., ~ 0 ., f )> ~ -0 -0 "Cl 0 [ ?S. 3 I ., iii .:, 0 ~ 0 t ~ i:l' a -0 0 ,:j-"' C cl ::,. 'O Cl> ::r Q. < en Ill :, ·iir (Q 0 "Tl 0 3 .. "" 0 :, 0 !!!. )> -0 "'O 0 X 3 ., lii 0 0 ~ 0 :, E. Cl" C :,. .. C. !!!. l: < 2· 3 I •,• •• ··-. ______ ....... . \ • .. .............. , '· \ _/ •• , ......... , ........ ·····1:,0 •••••.••..•• ·----.... ___ ... ·······•····· ... /\ .. ,·, .. -•. : .·· ···.:.:"". I \ ( ~ . \ !!!,. J ·:\ \ ;/ .. ···:\ -.. -~ 4 '.?e \ ., .,/ '¾~~~ ,/ ,//'_ .. ··, ~· "' ..•. -· 4-~·· .. Ill N ...-..... Geotechn-ics . ~JTE PLAN . . . rn:c o,rp·o ra te·d Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 102 T & B Planning Consullants, lnc. -,"' '(') I> u,r-~r.t ( \ Project No. 0447-002-00 Document No. 8-0367 FIGURE2 TITLE 24 REPORT Titte 24 Report for: €M€RAlO LAKE CORPORATE CENTER FARADAY AVE. CARLSBAD, CA 92697 Project Designer: NADEL ARCHITECTS 5465 MOREHOUSE DR. SUITE 165 SANOIEGO-, CA 92121 858 552-8424 Report Prepared By: TOM HARINTON HARtNTON MECHANICAL DESIGN 2041 Via Alexandra Escondido, CA 92026 {760} 745-442-5 Job Number.: Date: 1/15/01 The EnergyPro computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorizea ·by·the -California ·energy ·commission for use with both the ·Residential ancl"Nonresidential l99813unding Energy Efficiency Standards. This program developed by Gabel Dodd/EnergySoft, LLC (415) 883-5900. EnergyPro 2.1 By EnergySoft Job Number: User Number: 4945 < SCH/AMEA ENGINEEAING CCAPORAT/ON 11770 BERNARDO PLAZA COURT. SUITE 116 A SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 A PHONE [858) 673-5845 A FAX [858) 673-5849 February 13, 2003 (Revised February 21, 2003) Via Facsimile: 760-602-8561 Mr. Martin Aguilera Deputy Fire Marshal City of Carlsbad Fire Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 602-4660 Re: Lobby Openings Emerald Lake Corporate Center Carlsbad, California SEC Project No.: 2001045-000 PL.A"\ ~EC!<. t-lo.: PCF,-O 20 14 Dear Martin: Schirmer Engineering has evaluated the means of egress system of the first floor lobby for the referenced project. This letter report presents a brief summary of the findings of this evalua~ion and presents an alternate design approach for the non-rated openings occurring within the east portion of the lobby. Emerald Lake Corporate Center, LLC is currently in the final stages of completing the construction of a three-story office building located at 1525 Faraday Avenue in the City of Carlsbad. The 84,446 square foot building is of Type II One-hour construction and is fully sprinklered throughout. The primary means of egress system for the building includes one-hour fire-resistive corridors, one-hour fire-resistive stair enclosures and exterior exit doors. The ground floor includes a two- level lobby area connecting the one-hour fire-resistive corridor systems on the first and second floors. Occupants entering into this lobby have access to two separate exits; one is located within the west exterior wall and the other is located within the east exterior wall. The west portion of the lobby is greater than 30 feet in width and the east portion is approximately 22 feet in width. Both portions of the lobby include unprotected doors and glazed window openings in the walls separating the adjacent tenant spaces from the lobby. The glazed window openings located on either side of the tenant doors leading directly into the first floor lobby are also constructed with horizontal mullions. Section 1004.3.4.4 of the 1998 California Building Code (CBC) requires lobbies to be constructed as required for corridors. All door and window openings in corridor walls are required to be protected by assemblies having a 20 minute and three-fourths hour fire-protection rating, respectively. However, an exception listed under CBC Section 1004.3.4.3 permits Fire Protection Engineering • Code Consulting • Risk Control • Security Consulting Cf>o!o/10 Emerald Lake Corporate Center Carlsbad, California 2 February 13, 2003 (REV 3/4/03) SEC Project No.: 2001045-000 openings in corridor walls to be unprotected when the corridor is more than 30 feet in width. Therefore, the west portion of the lobby is permitted to have unprotected door and window openings within the surrounding walls. An exception listed under CBC Section 1005.3.3.3 for office buildings, permits a maximum of 50 percent of the exits to pass through a street-floor lobby, provided the entire street-floor is protected with an automatic sprinkler system. In this situation, the code recognizes that an automatic sprinkler system will provide a level of safety equivalent to an exit passageway on the ground floor leading from the exit enclosure directly to the exterior of the building 1. As stated previously, the Emerald Lake Corporate Center Building is fully sprinklered throughout. Further, only 50 percent of the required exits from the building travel through the lobby. Although the International Building Code (IBC) has not been adopted, Section 1004.3.2.1 of the 2000 Edition permits corridors in office buildings to be non-rated when the building is fully sprinklered. The 2000 Edition of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Life Safety Code also permits office buildings to have non-rated corridors when the building is protected throughout by an automatic sprinkler system. In lieu of providing protected openings in the east portion of the lobby, an increase in automatic sprinkler protection is being proposed within the adjoining tenant spaces. Specifically, additional sprinkler heads will be added above the unprotected openings to control temperature rises and mitigate heat exposure from a fire within the tenant spaces. Since the sprinkler heads are of the quick-response type, the water will be applied at the early stages of heat exposure, thereby limiting the chances for window or door overheating and failure. The application of window sprinkler protection in lieu of rated assemblies is widely recognized as a viable means of protection. The scientific mechanism that allows this form of protection to be effective is the convective and radiative heat transfer provided by the application of cool water. The density, thermal inertia and thermal conductivity of water provide a level of protection such that the incident heat fluxes are effectively absorbed and attenuated, thereby protecting the window and door openings. In addition to the alternate protection being proposed above, the automatic sprinkler protection within the lobby exceeds NFPA 13 requirements for light hazard occupancies. Specifically, automatic sprinkler spacing and design densities within the lobby are in accordance with Ordinary Hazard Criteria (e.g. 0.20 gpm/sq.ft.) found within NFPA 13 (see attached calculations). With this increase in automatic sprinkler protection incorporated into the design, the system will shift from control mode to suppression mode. A description of the increased automatic sprinkler protection follows: Walton2 performed a series of experiments to quantify the relationship between water application density and fire suppression (reduction in fire heat release rate) for light hazard occupancies. Wood cribs were utilized as the fuel package in these experiments. Wood cribs are typically utilized to represent light hazard occupancy fires due to the reproducibility and the fuel type (cellulosic). Also, a deep-seated fire, representative of shielded fires, is capable of being produced. 1 Handbook to the Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition, Pg. 211. 2 Walton, W.D., "Suppression of Wood Crib Fires with Sprinkler Sprays: Test Results," NISTIR 88-3696, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1988. · Emerald Lake Corporate Center Carlsbad, California 3 February 13, 2003 (REV 3/4/03) SEC Project No.: 2001045-000 The smaller crib size test results indicate rapid suppression is achieved for densities as low as 0.10-gpm/square foot. As the densities are increased from 0.1 O gpm/square foot (maximum density required for Light Hazard) to 0.15-gpm/square foot for larger fuel packages, a significant reduction in fire size and smoke production occurs. Although the study was limited to Light Hazard commodities, an analogy may be drawn for increasing the water application density for Ordinary Hazard Occupancies. Comparison of the effects of increased water application density between the 305-millimeter wo0d crib and the 610-millimeter wood crib reveals that the larger water application rate has a marked effect in the larger fuel package. Therefore, it is anticipated that a similar reduction in fire size and smoke production will be realized for increasing the densities to Ordinary Hazard criteria. In conclusion, the improved automatic sprinkler protection within the lobby will provide a level of fire protection and life safety that exceeds that prescribed in the CBC. Sincerely, Prepared by: Reviewed by: SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION James E. Churchill, P.E. Project Director JEC:lc:ma Attachments cc: Mr. Ron Gross -Nadel Architects Mr. Pat Kelley -City of Carlsbad fl{lr. Scott Merry -Meracon Garner A. Palenske, P.E. Regional Engineering Manager Via Facsimile: 858-552-8429 Via Facsimile: 760-602-8560 Via Facsimile: 760-944-0981 P:\JOB 2001\201045 Emerald Lake\ltjc.1055.M.Aguilera 2-13-03 (REV 3.4.03).doc SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATE: 2/13/2003 F:\HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS\EMERALD JOB TITL·E: EMERALD LAKE LOBBY CALC-6 HDS 0.20 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) BOR 111. 0 92.0 1550.0 110.4 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 243.7 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 143.7 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE (FT) (PSI) BOR 0.0 SOURCE 101.4 TOR 11. 0 94.6 1 11. 0 89.5 2 11. 0 56.0 3 11. 0 48.3 4 11. 0 17.0 12 10.0 K= 5.30 31. 9 13 10.0 K= 5.30 24.8 14 10.0 K= 5.30 20.4 15 10.0 K= 5.30 18.3 16 10.0 K= 5.30 15.0 17 10.0 K= 5.30 14.2 TOTAL REQ'D DEMAND PRESS. (GPM) (PSI) 243.7 101. 4 DISCHARGE (GPM) 143.7 --- --- --- --- --- 29.9 26.4 23.9 22.7 20.5 20.0 Page 1 LAKE.SDF SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 2 DATE: 2/13/2003 F:\HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS\EMERALD LAKE.SDF JOB TITliE: EMERALD LAKE LOBBY CALC-6 HDS 0.20 PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) FL/FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 143.7 2.067 PL 11.00 PF 2.0 BOR 0.0 SRCE 101. 4 (N/A) 13.7 120 FTG PE -4.8 TOR 11. 0 0.0 94.6 0.0 0.184 TL 11.00 PV Pipe: 2 143.5 2.067 PL 23.33 pp· 5.2 TOR 11. 0 0.0 94.6 0.0 13.7 120 FTG E PE 0.0 1 11. 0 0.0 89.5 0.0 0.183 TL 28.33 PV Pipe: 3 63.6 1.610 PL 212.00 PF 33.5 1 11. 0 0.0 89.5 0.0 10.0 120 FTG 4E2T PE 0.0 2 11. 0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.137 TL 244.00 PV Pipe: 4 79.9 1.610 PL 128.00 PF 33.5 1 11. 0 0.0 89.5 0.0 12.6 120 FTG 2E3T PE 0.0 2 11. 0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.209 TL 160.00 PV Pipe: 5 143.5 2.067 PL 27.00 PF 7.7 2 11. 0 0.0 56.0 0.0 13.7 120 FTG ET PE 0.0 3 11. 0 0.0 48.3 0.0 0.183 TL 42.00 PV Pipe: 7 143.5 1. 380 PL 6.83 PF 16.8 3 11. 0 0.0 48.3 0.0 30.8 120 FTG T PE 0.4 12 10.0 5.3 31. 9 29.9 1.311 TL 12.83 PV Pipe: 8 113.5 1. 380 PL 8.33 PF 7.1 12 10.0 5.3 31. 9 29.9 24.4 120 FTG PE 0.0 13 10.0 5.3 24.8 26.4 0.850 TL 8.33 PV Pipe: 9 87.2 1.380 PL 8.50 PF 4.4 13 10.0 5.3 24.8 26.4 18.7 120 FTG PE 0.0 14 10.0 5.3 20.4 23.9 0.521 TL 8.50 PV Pipe: 10 63.2 1.380 PL 7.08 PF 2.0 14 10.0 5.3 20.4 23.9 13.6 120 FTG PE 0.0 15 10.0 5.3 18.3 22.7 0.288 TL 7.08 PV Pipe: 11 40.5 1.380 PL 7.17 PF 0.9 15 10.0 5.3 18.3 22.7 8.7 120 FTG PE -0.4 4 11. 0 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.126 TL 7.17 PV Pipe: 12 40.5 1.049 PL 1.00 PF 2.4 4 11. 0 0.0 17.0 0.0 15.1 120 FTG 2E PE 0.4 16 10.0 5.3 15.0 20.5 0.481 TL 5.00 PV Pipe: 13 20.0 1.049 PL 6.00 PF 0.8 16 10.0 5.3 15.0 20.5 7.4 120 FTG PE 0.0 17 10.0 5.3 14.2 20.0 0.130 TL 6.00 PV SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3 DATE: 2/13/2003 F:\HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS\EMERALD LAKE.SDF JOB TITLE: EMERALD LAKE LOBBY CALC-6 HDS 0.20 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 7.4 computer program under license no. 2707032950 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 4792 Lavista Road Tucker, GA 30084 (2) The system has been calculated to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.082 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.904 gpm. (3) Total pressure at each node is used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 30.8 ft/sec at pipe 7. (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVlv BfyVlv GatVlv AlmChk DPVlv 1.049 2.00 5.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 1. 380 3.00 6.00 2.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 1. 610 4.00 8.00 2.00 9.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 2.067 5.00 10.00 3.00 11.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 N NPTee 5.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 120.0 1 100.0 G A u G E 80. 0 p R E s s 60. 0 u R E 40.0 p s i ) 20.0 0.0 -14.7 400 600 800 1000 WATER SUPPLY ANALYSIS Static: 111.00 psi Resid: 92.00 psi Flow: 1550.0 gpm 1200 1~ LEGEND Available pressure 110.38 psi@ 243.7 gpm 2 ~ Required pressure --101.43 psi@ 243.7 gpm 1400 FLOW (GPM) 1600 1800 c..i t:J 0 :i:,, tJ:J t-3 tz:l t-3 •• H , t-3 N t"'-....... tz:l I-' .. w -....... tz:l N :s:o tz:l 0 ~w :i:,, t:-< t:J t:-< :i:,, en ~ l1j tz:l ~ H t:-< z 0 ~ tJ:J t:-< tJ:J tz:l i-<: ~ o en :i:,, i-<: t:-< "l en 0 .. t-3 I / tz:l ::r:: :s: O'I i-<: t:J ::c: ::c: ~ i-<: t:J :i:,, t:J en c:: ~ t:-< :i:,, H C:: o O t-< H NOO o:i:,, 2000 t:-< :i:,, oz c:: :i:,, t:-< t-< :i:,, i-<: 1-3 en HH o en z en / tz:l :s: tz:l ~ :i:,, t:-< t:J t:-< :i:,, ~ l1j tz:l Ill . '° en <D t:J hj .i:,. SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5 DATE: 2/13/2003 F:\HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS\EMERALD LAKE.SDF JOB TI~LE: EMERALD LAKE LOBBY CALC-6 HDS 0.20 WATER SUPPLY CURVE 120+ I I I 110*0\\\\ I \\\\\\ I \\\\\\ IX \\\\\\ 100+ \\\\\\ I \\\\\\ I \\\\\ I * <-92.0 psi@ 1550 gpm 90+ Flow Test Point I I I P 80+ R I E I s I S 70+ u I R I E I 60+ I P I s I I 50+ ) I I I 40+ I I I 30+ I I !=========== ================== 20+ I I X I 10+ LEGEND Required Water Supply 101.43 psi@ 243.7 gpm I O = Available Water Supply I 110.38 psi@ 243.7 gpm I II II II II II " II " 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 FLOW (GPM) SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6 DATE: 2/13/2003 F:\HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS\EMERALD LAKE.SDF JOB TITiE: EMERALD LAKE LOBBY CALC-6 HDS 0.20 ., Uttlity Report: Equivalent K-Factor Calculator Node Sprinkler Pres. Dia. Name K-Factor (psi) (in) DROP 5.60 7.00 1.049 Pipe Ftgs. Len. (ft) 2.00 EET Total H-W Equivalent Len. (ft) coef. K-factor 11.00 120.00 5.30 NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Residential Land Owner, please read this option carefully and be sure you thoroughly understand the options before signing. The option you chose will affect your payment of the d~veloped Special Tax assessed on your property. This option is available only at the time of the first building permit issuance. Property owner signature is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is confirming the accuracy of all information shown. E\f\'\£v~ld ~a.~-e L-",f!>,4.te (c-11.--\.rc:1Ll..C Name of Owner Telephone Address City, State Zip Code \ bZ. S-£Ar.-. O ~ .. / A,-Q..... Project Address Carlsbad, California C:ity, State 9200 cg Zip Code Assessor's Parcel Number or APN and Lot Number if not yet subdivided by County Assessor. o \-\ C\.o Building Permit Number(s) As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City of Carlsbad, California, the City is authorized to levy a Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 1. All non-residential property, upon the issuance ofa building permit, shall have the option to (I) pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE- TIME or (2) assume the ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX -DEVELOPED PROPERTY for a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years. Please indicate your choice by initialing the appropriate line below: OPTION (1): I elect to pay the SPECIAL TAX -ONE-TIME no'b as a one-time payment . Amount of One-Time Special Tax: $ '2.. ( 2., S:(2-e . Owner's Initials exceed twenty-five (25) years. Maximum A pecial Tax: OPTION (2): I elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ANNUweriod not to $ '-Cf 1 ~ :( 8 • °' . Owner's Initials . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED ABOVE. Title PrintNamel Date The City of Carlsbad has not independently verified the information shown above. Therefore, we accept no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad I =J!• i Gi • li•l •J4 ·Lilli ,14111 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area ~41 ~ ~o % 'l-• s¥Ji = ~ o?7, gg~ao Date: '""l/ , 4 { o\ City Certification of Applicant Information: SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) ---.i:me3~ts-.1.1.nll:~S~chool District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person exe_cuting this declaration is authorized to sign on b f of the Owner. Signature: 1635 Farad Revised 4/20/00 Date: 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 @ .. I SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) ***************************~*********************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE .. BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by ·the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation _determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL ~ L .. DISTRICT OFFICIAL • -.~ ~~ -~Fteem-TITLE ... """NIii _ . . . . NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT Carlsbad Umfrnd Si:'.hool D:strict 801 p;d., t., ,.:ic,~~ DATE t)/ Carlsbad1 California 920Jt PHONE NUMBER ·l I :j F -----~---------·---· ---------·., ,"; .. ,.,._ .-.... ~ . .,. -·· .. _...,_.,, ----·-· ·-----------------... -............. -.. ----------' .... :·----::....,~· . ,_ '.'."-~ -~- CB010190 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD EMERALD LAKE CORPORATE CENTER 84500 SF STEEL FRAME OFFICE BLDG COMM IND COMM ''!· RON GROSS -,-,· --..,...,,, ,\ _____ . - / """/&" 0 I Ow.vJfv-[-:s:·j/ .J u..+1 fa f~(p·i.__. ' -r" J w -J _ (1 (. ·· (,.-· C r( r r ~ . -f-c) r; r(" . (__ I <.... /,-a C \fU .---rL ' ( V. I.=-, ' '-7 I .,__... ) ,.....,., _,l. 'I I, . . ; J--3 1~ o I r= -,... . :· c fl Su:J <Jt,q /1..A-~/-z-:,J ·/1 t-i·~,c' f-Cic,-co -s ~e_-l /_ / 1-----. . / ·(.--)U-o I f'1.v--C.. L 1.-~ ------. -.. ---------·------------·· ..,, __ --. \JJ( t~~ l '£~ ~ ~ BUILDING ...,, PLANNING -~- ENGINEERING ~ FIRE APPR/FORM ·-HEALTH DEPT %; HAZ MAT/ AIR QUAL a: OTHER SEWER DISTR .::f BLDG GRADING LE771:I 9-" FROM ~- APPLICANT ~-1 / 5>-0 I CJ__~ © F C I ~(~ID ! '!.~ ---· ,--;,,_,,-~-.-;.~~..,........;=:.;;.;.;.. PLAN CORR I; -~ .,_,,_.07 '.?:, -'I ENG CORR • ' . ..t.;;.~..i.;.~~~~-SCHOOL FbRM ~; I I I, l: 1, ~:.,.;;"1-f-J-+,J,._-;~~,-CFO F50RM ...,_ ------11-'"'-.......::..i-PE & MWORKSHElf -----',___,,.._,...,_ BLDG FEES COMPUffl: q/ £/61 ---/1;-5 5 ~l -_5 ef"--o I ~ .:a:-<:ffe.-Iv,(__, _ }: ?,,·7~0/ e~fJJ C Lh'? , _ I 3/ilfor-~J;_f,#JITA~~,£ ~3/ wvftfal) ~ ½ ~~ UJ1 9tio ~ r S, 3 ~:"01 ~1:17 <9. Vrc 1 . 3., c,· 1 ~--y e:s.3 {_l · '-'Lh1 .. "1(6 /01-Qrv v:6ff.' A/'7' ;{_,,,_J U 00Ae,y2£ z{ &p'/ cdyJZ-# uf vt\\b\ot f~\e-b ~'I'\ C \;.,,_,_ ~ p,pPl!c>-1 _. ,__. "" .. . '{)v.J.J.,fL -vi @) \l"t~c..> L "' . ,:! -1~v-a/ u7-J%G ~.c.:-, pl~ V jl\,v~ 'l.,~~ , ___ -----,--. .. . .---... _ 11{:Lo( ~~"~ __ {0-VL '..:;! --... -·-· . . ---- " -, I t ' I ! I ~ ,, ., ' ' :~ 'I .j ,'( :\ d :\ ~I i t /· , ! ') '·, , 1 3/:5/5 -/el;(~ ~/u~:.__1~-5'~~~ ~.J)~ ,I-.µ[~ J!,t/ki_/4~~-~~dV vf,v__-~ . Slflemf /Ill ® UPC 76540 No. 2-4945 HASTINGS, MN '·~ -------.,.---~-.. , ........ -~--,-···-.---...:..::r--·--~--.. -----~-------·--------------· -----------·= c '- ,, City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 03-07-2003 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR03036 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW EMERALD LAKE CENTER-REVISE INCREASE SPRINKLERS IN LIEU-PROTECT OPENINGS Applicant: RON GROSS 858 552-8424 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees Total Fees: $0.00 , Owner: Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 02/21/2003 RMA 03/07/2003 03/07/2003 $0.00 $0.00 Balance Due: $0.00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK No/2 CI{ c>_]{),] (,, EST. VAL.----,;:'·------- ~ ,:) lU ,J ~ Plan Ck. Deposit ________ _ Validated py ,-~ Date cJ, I ·::z. r / W- Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use Name Address City State/Zip Telephone,# Name Address City S.tate/Zip Telephone# -~i~~{ ~ > > ')A (Sec. 7031.6 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its ~ issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law CO · (Chapter' 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged -l exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). {)l, c;::i Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# '-> t State License # License Class City Business License # -t; Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone ~ State License # :2_ m~w»mmt~M~m§~~~i~~u:~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~w~~;:!f;:i~~ireii-r1r~J~;ft¾.T~~~~l~ w~~k;~. Co~p~~satio;;-Declaration: I hereby affirm i:;nd;r penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a 'certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company____________________ Polley No •. ___________ _ Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage 111 unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the c'ost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and'attorn!ly's fees. SIGNATURE.____________________________ DATE ________ _ timP~f.l~tt.~~1m~lh.~l1t@f~Amttl,1Bt~~11,~t-1!:~lll\tiJi}~~-i~~~~,~w1rA¥lf~r;1~~~1]!{~fmtzf!~~1rlfi'll~l'J~:i~;tr,r&;;-E:.1t~Ei?~ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: C:..!i:" 14) ' ~ 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for· sale µl. C,, (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does ~ .Ji'" such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is 2 ;3 sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for, the purpose of sale). -~ 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively· contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The LL 0-Contractor's License Law doe~ not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed () o pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 2 /\ ,0 'iii ~ ¥ :: ~ ~ I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property Improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted_with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): ~ .c:,_, 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): · .____J 6. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ address / phone 'number/ type of work):. _______________________ :----------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ___________ -,-__________ DATE _________ .;... fp~Nfifflnf6@f~~!>,~l('P,pl81tiaJ!l~i{ilijl;Jfjflfflf!J;BMk'($J~)}'t:.,_~\t{~~!l,,~fj~!1.iiZ~~~~~~,f~:fJ[\~~t;l~t;;&~f;~ is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 26505, 25633 or 25634 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain. a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site 7 O YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ~IFstW~\t~'W~(l$ltf~~~m!~lf~,w[~~~~~~;~l11:~W~~~~~&W~~~[19~}~~~;:y,;}~~~~1½~~f?~~1~1i\~~~~~i~~~~]:~~i{~~-~1i:f~~j~~~:r~ I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(il Civil Code) • .. LENDER'S NAME _____________ _ LENDER'S ADDRESS ______ --,, _______________ _ Wii%!F'9'1<"1!M'l;!';.'W<,-~"'1'111ll1:-i!11'iiif""~~'!<,~M)''e-\;"'r-,,,.,.,.,.,'J;l,...,"""'-'"lr.""'<'"":~"o/,;cy,'i!Jii"';;,=,,m '"""'"""'ifi~""'"""' W,)17,fu,WU~• ~"""Ml"l"""''~"""'~"'Y-''f """"'~' """-~?""'~' u,:, ,,.,. :;~?:¼{,1j)i~f:!r~!S!f:.\f!Ntsu;n:..ut:1Srt,;it.t.'l'Ji~!U~\.;;1~H:h.i~i~\~1#~~1~'{£;~~¼.\¼:i1.1;,.~$.~liti."1ht~~H~!t~·~}}~1.;1,cll~1:,i;~:~l'\i1ic,;";~:...:J.\;~k~t~:;;m~j:J'.9i~~~!~#" ~i;;~~1<~~:tt-~'~ill·:.:.:5:ittr£~Y.li'f;~~ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and St!!,te laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSP AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HA~MLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit Is required for excavations over 6'0" _deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height, EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced wit in 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time ati:1r the work is commenced for, pe d of 1so days action 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code}, APPLICANT'~ ·JIGNATURE Ct-dt,. DATE +I /dr::!cJ -4--,7f---=-------- PINK: Finance f . . . -~. . . ....... PCR03036 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD EMERALD LAKE CENTER-REVISE INCREASE SPRINKLERS IN LIEU-PROTECT OPE PCR Lot#: RON GROSS 1/11 (~ ~:· > I l'J· ' 'lb /of/(+· ~h I c? /F.Fvw {)K ·1,J/ AA _ ---r / +;,,...,,,, /J, f11)-· fl?' fL L / r,1 /I{~ f;----r ,»---~ / 1-f'vl-Mr BUILDING PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT TO FROM. HAZ MAT/ AIR QUAL OTHER SEWER DISTR BLDG GRADING LETTER APPLICANT APPLICANT -----+-----PLAN CORR -----+-----ENG CORR -----+-----SCHOOL FORM -----+-----CFDFORM -----+-----PE & M WORKSHEET ___ __,,__ ___ BLDG FEES COMPLETE' \· \ i I l I I l I I I i I ~ 0\CfJ<f> City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 11-26-2002 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02014 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: RON GROSS STE 165 1525 FARA0AY-AV CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW MERALD LAKE CORP CNTR-REVISE ELEVATOR SUMP & MECH ENCLOSURE Owner: 5265 MOREHOUSE DR 92121 858 552-8429 Total Fees: $360.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees Inspector: Total Payments To Date: FINAL APPROVAL Date: ______ _ $0.00 Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 01/10/2002 RMA 11/26/2002 11/26/2002 2189 11/26/02 0002 01 CGP Balance Due: Clearance: $360.00 $0.00 $360.00 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'foes/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have nreviouslv been niven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has nreviouslv otherwise exnired. 02 PERMIT APPLICATION~ <::/;N tf/ 9"{) CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT EST. VAL. _________ _ 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Ck. Deposit ----r'I-,.----- ·.1. Address (include Bldg/Suite #) -Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Description of Work SQ. FT. #o~/'j;tf)/.1_ 7'c> IA--Jf~m~. # of Bathrooms 2.:. ·{?;;J PG~5Sent·w,:;z:t~/zect~. -~iz.,·tj ~=~:~,~ .: Ill-JC.: ::~i Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # ;3. APPLICANT · O·Ci>n~faptor, . °O Agent--for'Co11tractor'.· ·o·owner· ')19.Agent,for·Qwnei Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# PROl;'ERT-Y OWNER · Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# ·.5. CONTRACTOR-~ ·coMPAI\IYIN~ME •• ~ < C ~ ':: ~-"; (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construc;t, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code). or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # _________ _ License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ -6 •. ·-WORKERS'. COMPENSATION-: Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. · 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company____________________ Policy No. Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ______________________________ _ DATE ________ _ ·7;· ·OWNER~~uiLDER'.oECLARATION . . --· •:O I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _______________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _____________________ _ DATE -----------COMPl:£TE'THIS SECTION.-FOR NOrf-RESIOEN.TIAI; Bl,IILDING l'ERMITS·:oNL'.Y-.-:; ·_, Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a businel;s plan, acutely hazardous materials registration i'orm or risK management &11.i i),.,vention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES' 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ,8, .. ~O_N~TRUCTION LE_NDING AGl;NC'( . . · . ' -. , .. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ______________ _ LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ ,9', ·. AP.P.LICANT CEl'ITIF,ICATIOI\I . . ~ .. ' I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit\' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work ~ authorized by such permit is not commen e · in 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commence or a p iod of 180 ys (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). / / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ---+-"=-'44--"""..,__ __ __,_-=~-.-,:.;__ ________ :)ATE \ ( 0 0 ( , t PINK: Finance ·I ,.. EsGil Corporation 1.n. Partn.ersliip witli (Jovemment for '13uilaing Safetg DATE: November 22, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 PCR02014 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. SET: 11l(REV) PROJECT NAME: Emerald Lake Corporate Center -Plan Changes O~CANT ~ 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE. D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified in the attached list are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esg·il Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the pla11 check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 11/13 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 / Carlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 11l(REV). November 22, 2002 Applicant to add the following (to be apparent) note to the Title sheet: INSPECTOR: PRIOR TO UNDERGROUND INSPECTION APPROVAL FOR THE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE PAD, THE. MECHANICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD WILL PROVIDE A (CITY) APPROVED LAYOUT FOR THE SPECIFIED COOLING TOWER. EsGil Corporation '.ln Partners/Up Witli (jovemment for '.BuiUing Safety DATE: August 23, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 PCR02014 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. SET: II(REV) PROJECT NAME: Emerald Lake Corporate Center -Plan Changes D APPLICANT 0~ D~EVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes whe·n minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [ZJ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [ZJ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nadel Architects, Attn: Ron Gross 9265 Morehouse Dr.,# 165, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. [ZJ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross Telephone#: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: ~{ze,/~,_ (by: f-A~) Fax #: (858) 552-8429 Mail ..,-,:elephone Fax/ In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: . Esgil Corporation D GA . D MB [8] EJ D PC 8/16 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 . , 'Carlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 II(REV) August 23, 2002 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PCR02014 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/16 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 SET: II(REV) DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: August 23, 2002 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. _ If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo Ca;rlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 II(REV) August 23, 2002 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen PLUMBING (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Include the following design parameters for the relocated elevator pit disposal: • How is the discharge tank maintained? How does the facility maintenance personnel realize that it must be serviced? The note added makes it sound like the alarm is going to go off in a sequestered elevator equipment room when the sump pump is operating and then stop after the sump pump stops. Detail how the alarm system will notify that the sump needs servicing. MECHANICAL (19_97 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 3. Provide the installation instructions for the cooling tower. Of primary concern is the proximity of the vinyl _covered chain link fence to the inlet for the cooling tower. Include net opening area for the fence and the manufacturers installation instructions allowing the degree of obstruction provide by the fence that close to the equipment. are provided. The size of the pad, equipment, and clearances have all changed. Please provide the requested information. ·Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plum.bing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. EsGil Corporation 'l,n Partners/i,ip wit/i, (jovemment for 'lJuifaing Safety DATE: January 23, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 PCR02014 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. SET:I(REV) ~NT ~ a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PROJECT NAME: Emerald Lake Corporate Center -Plan Changes D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. · !Z) The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed -for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. !Z) The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nadel Architects, Attn: Ron Gross 9265 Morehouse Dr.,# 165, San Diego, CA 92121 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. !Z) . Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross L"--"\ Telephone#: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: L (i ~ (byJ.5 ) Fax #: (858) 552-8429 Mail __:relephone -Fax ,...-In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB [gJ EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/14 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 f ( Carlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 January 23, 2002 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PCR02014 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/14 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: January 23, 2002 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building _Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. • To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? D Yes 0 No Carlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 January 23, 2002 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen PLUMBING .(1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Include the following design parameters for the relocated elevator pit disposal: • Plumbing fixtures shall drain by gravity wherever practicable. The design as submitted is pressurized all the way to the discharge tank. I'm not sure that enough hydraulic fluid is in the elevator system to even fill the discharge pipe, let alone the tank. If this is the case the hydraulic fluid will be pumped into the pipe where it will remain. Please address. • How is the discharge tank maintained? How does the facility maintenance personnel realize that it must be serviced? MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 3. Provide the installation instructions for the cooling tower. Of primary concern is the proximity of the vinyl covered chain link fence to the inlet for the cooling tower. Include net opening area for the fence and the manufacturers installation instructions allowing the degree of obstruction provide by the fence that close to the equipment. are provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 01-190 PCR02014 January 23, 2002 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PCR02014 PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-190 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela DATE: January 23, 2002 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. Emerald Lake Corporate Center PCH BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-lhr BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. \ Time Air Conditioning :, Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee / • / 1994 use Plan Check Fee Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee =8 Repeats * Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other 0 Hourly 31 Hours* Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $360.001 $2aa.ooj Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad •@ a i twm oo • a 1, 4 •• 1114 a. lt4J 3!11 /o V BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIS~ . _ j) PLANCHECK NO.: CB {) L -l 'T DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: f(v< ~~~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Cl Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement ~greement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet EST. VALUE: By: Date: Date: By: -------- ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: .{760) 602-27 41 CFO INFORMATION Paree! Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: D Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 tt:1wo_Ro11J~'l"el'Cl'~~@JnB11cJ@:arlsbad, CA 920081-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602.iB!S@~ . BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3RD D 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: D A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography ,C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. A. 8. C. ' Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number · Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with · the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT .NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:IWORDIDOCSICHKLS'l\Bllll1ino PlatW:l1eCk Cid$! Fonn (Genedc).doc 2 ·-Rev. 7/14/IJO , \. D D D D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No .. _______________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: _________ _ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and ·for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:____________ Date: ____ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:IWORD\DOCSICHKLSnBullding Planched< Cklst Fonn (RIDDLE • HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rev. 12/26196 '\ D D D D D D D D D D D D ~D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST · checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ---- 6b. Construction of. the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to'make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NJOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: ---------- 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:IWORD\OOCSICHKLST\Bulldlng Plancheck Cklst Fann (GENERIC 7-14-00).doc __ 4 Rev. 7/14/00 l v BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD D D D 7d .No Grading Permit required. D D D 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. D D D D D D D D D D D D D MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date:------------ 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) p~rm.it. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to · discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. a __!3.e'quired fees are attached _}J'No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are in.accurate during low-flow conditi_ons. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:IWOROIDOCS\CHKLS1'Bulldlng Planoheck Cklst Fann (Generic).doc 5 Rev. 7/14/00 1sr D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street).' 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is.not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check tne recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: ~-·---~ STA 1 +00 Install 2" service arid 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) · • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters {unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water . ----- H:IWORD\DOCSICHKLS1\Buildlng Plandled< Ckbl Fann (Generic),doc -6 Rev. 7/14/00 ,J 1ST 2ND 3RD D D D D 12c. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the,San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Additional Comments: H:\WORD\DOCSICHKI.ST\BulldinijPiiiiicheck Cklst Form (Geneflc),doc -7 Rev, 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address:-------'-----------Bldg. Permit No. ________ _ Prepared by: ____ _ Date: -----Checked by: ____ _ Date: ----- EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units:. _____ _ EDU's: ----- Types of Use: -------Sq. Ft./Units: _____ _ EDU's: ------ ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. F~./Units: _____ _ ADT's: ------ Types of Use: ______ _ Sq. Ft./Units: _____ _ ADT's: ------ FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFO: D YES (no bridge,& thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) . "'. . ONO D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: =$ D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS:. X FEE/ADT: · =$ D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3 _) ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: UNIT/SO.FT.: X FEE/SO.FT./UNIT: =$ D 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: X FEE/EDU: =$ BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: X FEE/EDU: =$ D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA HIGH /LOW ACRES: X FEE/AC: =$ D 8. POT ABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 of2 --------------- Word\Docs\Mlsforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet . Rev. I/14/00 C: C: "' "' C: C: ~ «> 'Ila -"' 0 a, ..c: (.) C: "' C: Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created permit: ) Legend: ~ Item Complete D Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE ___ _ DATE OF COMPLETION: ________ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _______ DATE __ _ PROJECT NO. _________ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: ----------------------- Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ______________________ _ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance. Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES__ NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES__ NO by this If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Requfred" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance -May 21, 1993.) Oata Entry Completed? YES __ NO __ (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct-Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 DOD D'D D ODD ODO o·o D D D· D 0 D D 'D· D D Site Plan: .. . ' 1. Provide .a·.tully dimensional site plan drawn to s.cale. · Show: North cJrrc;,w, property lines, easements,· e·~isting and proposed structures,· streets; existing street improvements, 'right- of.-way wigth, ·dimensional s~tbacks i:tnd existin,g. t,opographical lines (ihcTud.ing all ,~ide and . rec1r yard slopes). ' · 2. Prqvide legal description oJ pr9perty .arid ass~ssor's p~rcel number. Policy 44 ~ N~{Qht:>~rhood. Arch.itecturaJ .Oeslgn Guidelines 1. App'licability,: YES_....,.... __ NO ___ .-,--_ _.,... 2. Project complies YES NO -~ --,--....,...,,- Zoning: l. Setbacks:. Froqt: Interior Side·; · · Sfreet Sidc;i·: -Requited Shown ------'- • Reqliir~d Shown ------,--,- Requir.ed. Shown ------" Rear: Required Shown ---'-'----'---"-- Top-of slope: Required---'--------'---_Shown _____ _ 2. Accessory structure. setbacks: Front: .Required 'Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street -Sid13: Re.quired ... ·. Shown Rear: Requiried S!,own Sttuctme separation: Require~ •. Shown -3. Lot Covera_g·e: Required Shown 4. Height: Required .. Shown 5. Parking: Spaces Required .. Shown . . , . .-·· H:\ADfYIIN\COUNT~R\BldgPln9t,kRevChklst Rev 9/01 -®@@JV I SU-CERTIFIED November 7, 2002 Mr. Tom Harrinton Harrinton Mechanical Baltimore Aircoil Company c/o Air Treatment Corporation 333 South Juniper, #102 Escondido, CA 92025 Subject: (1) FXV~643-OM U024986201 Dear Mr. Harrinton: This letter is to infonn you that the regular chain-link fence located at 1 foot away from the air intake side of the above FXV unit will not affect its thennal perfonnance . . For comparison, BAC currently provides the option of air intake screens for FXV units without any adjustment to their thennal perfonnance. If you have questions, please contact me at 410-799-6235. Sincerely, BAL Til\tIORE AIR.COIL COMP ANY Charles Wang ~---··· Senior Marketing Engineer Closed Circuit Cooling Systems cc: Lanrty Westerman Air Treatment Corporation P.O. Box 7322 • Baltimore, Maryland 21227 • 7595 Montevideo Road·· Jessup, Maryland 20794 • U.S.A. Telepnone: (410) 799-6200 • Fax: (410) 799-6416 • Web Site: hHp://www.baltaircoil.com Amste·d INDUSTRIES Mar-13-01 10:SIA Air Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 Air Treatment Corporation HVAC MANUFACTURERS REPRESENTATIVE TO: Nadel DATE: March 13, 2001 ATTN: Ron Gross FROM: Ted Obrockta FAX NO.: 858.552.8429 PAGE 1 OF 11 REGARDING: Emerald Lake Corp. Ron, Tom Harrington requested I fax the FXV Tower Layout package to you. 0 Main Office 807 S. Lemon Ave. Walnut, CA 91789 (909} 869-7975 Fax(909)595-6874 D San Francisco 6116 Merced Ave. # 303 Oakland, CA 94611 (510) 655-3990 Fax(510)65?-7966 @San_Diego 333 S. Juniper St. Ste. 200 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-2040 Fax(760)743-2144 P.01 Mar-13-01 10:52A A;r Treatment Corporation 760-743-2144 P.02 B.A.C. Engineer_ing Bulletin @2000 Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. Series 1500 Product Layout Electronic Library Document# 1258 Cooling towers, coolers, and condensers, all depend upon an adequate supply of fresh, ambient air to provide design capacity. Other· important considerations such as the proximity to building air intakes or discharges also must be taken into account when selecting and designing the equipment site. This bulletin presents the design guidelines for siting one, two or three cells of Series 1500 products in several situations typically encountered by designers. All of the guidelines present recommended spacing requirements for good performance, but more liberal spacing should be ·proviqed where possible. Also, note that as the size of an insta.llation grows larger and larger, the total amount of heat being rejected to the atmosphere and the volume of discharge air increases accordingly -to the point where the towers virtually create their own environment. As a result, it becomes increasingly difficult to apply a set of correct general guidelines each case. Consequently, it is recommended the layout of large Series1500 instsllations be referred to the appropriate Product Department in Baltimore for review. As is typical of axial fan equipment, Series 1500 Products are not generally suited for indoor or ducted applications. In such situations, the Series V centrifugal fan unit is preferred. General Considerations: When selecting the site for a Series 1500 Product installation, consider the following factors. 1. Locate the unit to prevent the warm. discharge air and any associated drift from being introduced into the fresh air intakes of the building(s) served by the unit or the intakes of neighboring buildings. \ 2. Consider the potential for plume formation and its effect on the surroundings, such as large windowed areas, and pedestrian or vehicular traffic arteries. 3. Provide sufficient unobstructed space around the unit(s) to ensure ari adequate supply of fresh, ambient air to the intake. Avoid situations where adjacent walls or structures might -deflect some of the discharge airstream back into the air inlet (recirculation) or promote recirculation by generating high, downward air velocities in the vicinity of the intake. Also, ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.1 M~r-13-01 10:52A A;r Treatment corpora~ion /oU-/4~-~i~~ avoid locations where building air intakes or exhausts, such as boiler stacks in the vicinity o_f the unit, might raise the inlet wet bulb temperature or starve the unit of air. 4. Provide adequate space around the unit for piping and proper servicing and maintenance as shown below in Figure 1. ////)t////// 2' min. 4' min. :2' min. ////////// Figure 1 --d"' See explaination below / / / / / / / / 5. The top of the fan discharge cylinders must be at least level with and preferably higher than any adjacent walls or buildings. 6. When possible, orient the unit such that prevailing winds blow discharge airstream toward blank-off side of unit. 7. The recommended configuration for multiple cell units is back-to-back with the air intakes facing outward, rather than end-to-end in a line. Multiple cells arranged in end-to-end tend to create a "wail" of moist discharge air which could easily be swept into the intakes due to prevailing wind. Additionally, in the extreme cases, when multiple cells are ·arranged with the air inlets facing, the dimensions given should be doubled for adequate air to each unit. The "Layout Guidelines" section of this bulletin describe several typical siting situations for Series 1500 Products. If these guidelines do not cover a particular situation or if the layout criteria cannot be met, please refer the application to the appropriate Product Department in Baltimore for review. Please indicate prevailing wind direction, geographic orientation of the unit(s), and other factors such as large buildings and other obstructions that may influence layout decisions. ELD #1258 (1/18/2.000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.2 Mar-13-01 10:52A Air Treatment corpora~1on /OU-f~~-Li~~ ......• u .... A. Adjacent to a Building or Wall 1. Unit Orientation When a Series 1500 Product 1s located near a building wait, the preferred arrangement is to have the tower situated with the blank-off side (unlouvered face) or ends facing the adjacent waH or building. 2. Air Inlet Requirements: Whenever possible .the blank-off side of the uriit should face the wall. Should it ever be absolutely necessary to install a unit with the air inlet facing a wall, allow a minimum "d' dimension between the air inlet and the wait. Below is the method for determining the "d" dimension for a Series 1500 unit located with the air inlet facing a solid wall: The envelope velocity should not exceed 300 fprn using the following equation: Envelope Velocity :;:; Unit cfm Envelope area Note: The louver face CFM for the Series 1500 coil products is 70% of the total unit airflow. The remaining 30% of the airflow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. The Envelope area is [2(H+h) +L]d where: H is the height of the air inlet face in ft his the elevation of the unit in ft (the maximum elevation is 4') L is the length of the air inlet in ft d is the distance from the wall to the air inlet face in ft For your convenience, we have tabulated the "d" for 0', 21, and 4' elevation for the one cell, two cell and three cell Series 1500 cooling towers and coil products in Table 1 and 2, respectively. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000} B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.3 ~ar-13-01 10:53A Air Trea~men~ Lorpora~,on ,ou-,~~-~i~~ r ·-- Table 1: Minimum Air Inlet Distance "d" to Solid Wall for Cooling Towers Elevation Singte..Cell-Model Number O' . 2' 4' 15146, 15160, 15176 7' 4' 3' 15162, 15177, 15201, 15219 7.5' 4.5 3' 15200, 15227,15250 7' 4' ,' 3' 15214,15245,15270, 15282 7.5' 4.5' . 3' 15296,15325, 1535015368 9.5' 5.5' 4' 15310, 15340, 15365, 15385, 15425 10.5' 6' 4.5' Elevation Two.Cell Model Number O' 2' 4' 15146-2 thru 15176-2 10.5' 7' 5' 15162-2thru 15219-2 12' 7.5' 5.5' 15200-2 thru 15250-2 7' 4' 3' 15214-2 th·ru 15282-2 12.5' 7.5'. 5.5' 15296-2 thru 15368-2 15' g~s· 7' 15310-2 thru 15425-2 16.5' 10.5' 8' Elevation Three-Cell Model Number o· 2' 4' 1s146-3 thru 1s11a-3 12.5' 9' 7' 15162-3 thru 15219-3 '14.5' 10' 7.5' 15200-3 thru 15250-3 14.5' 9.5' 7' 15214-3 thru 15282-3 16' 10.5' 7.5' 15296-3 ,thru 15368-3 18' 12.5' 9.5' 15310-3 thru 15425-3 20' 14' 10.5' ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.4 ~ar-13-01 10:53A Air 1rea~men~ ~orpora~,on ICU-, ... ~-e-..L ..... -.. r ·-- Table 2: Minimum Air Inlet Distance "d" to Solid Wall for Series 1·500 Coil Products Single-Cell Elevation Single-Cell FXV & Low HP FXV CXV Model Number Model Number o•. 2' 4' CXV64-95 FXV421-424 4' 4' 4' CXV 103--153 FXV 431-434 4' 4' 4' CXV 160·206 FXV441-444 4.5' 4' 4' FXV Q440-Q441 CXV 196-305 FXV641-644 s· 4.5' 4' FXV Q640-Q641 CXV310-481 FXV 661-664 7' 6' 5,5' FXV 0660-0661 Two-Cell Elevation Two-Cell FXV & Low HP FXV CXV Model Number Model Number o· 2' 4' CXV64-95 FXV 421-424 4' 4' 4' CXV 103-153 FXV431-434 5' 5.5' 5.5' CXV 160..206 FXV 441-444 8' 7.5' 7' FXV Q440-Q441 CXV 196-305 FXV 641-644 10.5' 10' 9.5' FXV Q640 -Q681 CXV 310-481 FXV661-664 15.5' 15' 14' FXV Q660-Q661 ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) 8.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.5 B. The Well Installation If the well extends to 11L", the length of the air inlet face, on either side of the tower, then the layout can be considered a well layout. The following method is used to determine the "d" dimension for a unit installed in a well layout. ,-------, f 1· 1 I Air Inlet I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 3 The downward velocity for a well installation should not exceed 300 fpm for coil products and 400, fpm for cooling towers. The downward velocity is determined using · the following equation: Downward velocity= Unit cfm Useable well area Note: The louver face CFM for the Series 1500 coil products is 70% of the total unit airflow. The remaining 30% of the airflow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. The usable well area is defined as (d)(L+4)+4 where d is the distance from the air inlet ·of the unit to the wall of the well in ft L is the length of the air intake of the unit in ft. Table 3 gives the "d" dimensions for multiple cooling towers, closed circuit cooling towers, and condensers installed in a well. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.6 ~ar-13-01 10:54A Air Treatment corpora~,on ,ou-,~~-~i~~ Table 3 : Minimum Air Inlet Distance "cl" for Well Installations S C r T eries 1500 ooing owers Number Of Cells Model Number One Two Three 15146, 15160,15176 9' 10.5' '11' 15162, 15177, 15201,15219 11' 13' 14' 15200, 15227, 15250 12' 14.5' 15.5' 15214,15245, 15270,15282 14' 17' 18' 15296, 15325, 15350,15368 14' 16' 17' 15310, 15340, 15365, 16.5' 19' 20' 15385, 15425 Series 1500 Industrial Closed Circuit Cooling Towers (FXV) & E f C d (CXV) vapora 1ve on ensers FXV & Low HP FXV Number of Cells .• CXV l\llodel Number Model Number One Two 64-95 421-424 9' 11.5' 103-153 431-434 11' 13' 160-206 441-444 12' 14' 0440-0441 12' 14' 196-305 641-644 16' 18' 0640-0641 16' 18' 310-481 661-664 17.5' 19.5' 0660-0661 17.5' 19.5' ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.7 Mar-13-01 10:54A A;r Treatment Corporat;on 760-74~-~i~~ C. The Louvered or Slotted Wall Installations: Check to see if the layout meets the requirements for a well installation. If the criteria for the weH location are met, the layout is satisfactory. If the layout does not satisfy the criteria for the well installation, analyze the layout as follows: · --------4------------------·-------- 4' min. Air Inlet 2f Figure 4 1. Air inlet requirements: The Series 1500 Products should be arranged within the enclosure such that: a. The air inlet directly faces the louver or slot locations as shown in Figure 4. b. Maintain c)t least four feet (4'-0") between the unit air inlets and the louvered or slotted wall for uniform air distribution. c. If the available space does not permit the products to be arranged with the air inlets facing the louvered or slotted walls and the enclosure cannot be modified to permit such an arrangement, consider the alternative illustrated in Figure 5. The arrangement shown in Figure 5 should be restricted to one-cell or two-cell units. ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.8 Mar-13-01 10:54A Air Treatment Corporation /oU-/~~-~i** I I II I Figure 5 2. Louver Requirements: Air inlet I I I I I a. Louvers must provide at least 50% net free area to ensure that the unit airflow is not reduced due to static pressure losses. · b. Determining-the required total louver or slot area is based on drawing the total unit airflow through the net free area of the louvers at a velocity of 600 fpm or less. c. The louver area should be .located in the walls of the enclosure such that air flows uniformly to the air inlets. d. If the unit is elevated to ensure that the discharge is at the same level as the enclosure. It is acceptable to extend the louvered or slot area below the base of the units up to 2 ft. if needed lo achieve the minimum gross louver area . To calculate downward air velocity, the usable louvered or slot area may extended up to 2 ft. beyond the ends of the unit. Calculate the louver velocity as follows: Note: The louver velocity for the FXV/CXV is based on 70% of the total unit airflow which is the amount entering the air inlet face. The remaining 30% of the airflow enters the unit through the top of the coil section. For the Series 1500 Cooling Towers: Louver Velocity= Total Unit Airflow (cfm) =600fpm ELD #1258 (1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering Bulletin P.9 ~ar-13-01 I0:55A Air Treatment Corporation /bU-/~~-~i~~ ~. % louver Free Area (sq ft) x Gross Louver Area For the Series 1500 Coil Products: Louver Velocity= Louver face Airflow (cfm) = 600 fpm % Louver Free Area (sq ft) x Gross Louver Area· ELD #1258 {1/18/2000) B.A.C. Engineering a·u11etin P.10 > .. ·\:.., r/ro( o2-TC ;J!0rL J·d:Yo;J_. ~w/~ r-'v-~t vkMA I« f,t;L . :'i J.J CL-~ t) /(){'IO -/if& z, -A'L .a-,:-.\n l.,e. s \. "--\..eg.~ .J. ~7g~~ \ p I'. r, •olu )?, . ,r?\ o---> \ '(,'/ (;-c,, . -~ w. """ Pc-12._,-f<--'i""''-~ <B • ' ~ . ~fe 7¼A 5 md !' /. o If 11-<J.Of le) 3 -oc rial ~ /)['tr} h, • I Co ;cul) k!Er. I riov1 ~-2£,-0 c. ''~ GL;.., <J.OJ ~ 0 C i+y c,A-f c...'jt fV«, PCR02014 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD MERALD LAKE CORP CNTR-REVISE ELEVATOR SUMP & MECH ENCLOSURE PCR lot#: RON GROSS v-.1L \ tl -z_fh.-itJ.l;;J~ ~-;¼,-0.Z.. p~. 6-z.~eM (:_g rrodwkJS : 3:-1Ekl2-7UNJ - 3-16'Cf2...~-- 11-4od"' re Vf-p ~ ,JU;t,01-· /1}!7-./(lJ._ fn ~ ~-(}IA G~-Jaltv~ A ~~ Ov n(Jr /JI_,frf'AoY fL!K5 o1 l)ocs it-(""3 .... o-z -1\-?"i> t-{"',.Jcl...dc;.,,;-ec)....1.f:-+-T~E.s, c.--~i~~ ~ ~cR~cL 11( cc.:( u t.. ILT'T--"'f iV,1-,,-, 1")) · 6 w p <1.. ® /> C fl c_ c {1 -s.., f--f-. 'kc:;1 'ii /1 I f .-, fr,; rr ,,_ ~ --\ . \1 \ '-,, City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 04-15-2002 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02~ Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 ~ Job Address: Permit Type: 1525 FARADAY AV CBAD PCR Status: ISSUED 03/18/2002 JM 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 Parcel No: Lot#: 0 Valuation: 'Reference #: $0.00 CB010119 Construction Type: NEW ', :Project Title: Applicant: · NADEL ARCHITECTS EMERALD LAKE CORP CENTER CHANGE TO METAL STUDS 5465 MOREHOUSE DRIVE SAN DIEGO CA 92121 858-552-8424 Owner: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: 5033 04/1.5/02 r,rv"1:. ... ) ,t'\·i '...t•.E\i~ ~~,..,,,. :c· 01=r 3,;o ;n -----------------------------,.---------------,-------$360.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $360.00 ,I r Total Fees: Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date: ______ _ $360.00 $0.00 Clearance: ------- NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030, Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. PERMIT APPLICATION . FOR OFFICE USE O~L Y? . _ 0 6 PLAN CHECK NO(JC/g:12 ° 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 EST. VAL _________ _ C/301 ul</tJ Plan Ck. Depos·~ -=i:i:=------~- Validated By__,...,_-'--...,...-.,.__,....., _ _,,..,,__ Date ______ ~~--.;.J..--=....;;::=:;..._ Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number· Unit No. Phase No. Total # of uriits Assessor's Parcel # 1 M-e.!rul ~h.io.. {'c.lc.1. Existing Use Proposed Use !?(Description of Work SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms ~ ~zfl;~It:;~'?':~<!t:ilif!~fo\if{(9;~·~ttdt{~~::~:;~:a~·1;~·.:,.:2:~~~:~:·~;~~:E;:;~:~;'.:,: '·" ,, .:.;{ft,'~) jj, ~~(~{s~· );,i~· ?>:~,~~~~·.:7½i · Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# Fax# ~rA1>e!i@fif'.?Gr~olifr~1cir,[TEl~AgJrvrtc/t;c~t~l@TI:;"Qf:ow.Wf::-°~"~Gli~~nfff6f~ri;r;:.;,.,ri::i~:~.-.:~?··,· · Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# ~( ,T"CQtfr:1.IAI~:i:Q"lf,iQOMPFN.X:itf~Ni[:IT=:~r:;::;-z::J::::r~;:3;:z;~ ~.;,,,fu.,.;,,-..:,. •• ,:. ._,,,,.,;.,_ (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the allegecj exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # _________ _ License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ ;~J.·,·:::W9.BJSJ:R§~'!il9.M.Pl°[ll~AJ:l9f'I\: .. · .. :. :L>~:,~:¼f,. ,.:,:~'.~ ~: . .-;;,,::·L~;-..:]L-· .,,::_, :.;:::::,·? •. ::.,·.. ,._.'i:·Li'E:;':-~!f: ;:.~:: .. , ·. ,-: ·:,.: .. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company____________________ Policy No.____________ Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of Ca!ifornia. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE. __ '-----------,--,------------------DATE _________ _ t,;; '.'.\'oWNER{BOliJDEifciECUARAT{o'fl,: ,,,;:,L;::,;/1• :":> ·-:2.:. ~·: .U\.~ < ./ :;:;Jt'i, !.JJ,:,}:,~,.;{ :'{j :· ... · ··; ,;·,' ·:: :. ,'' ·. < -' ·~ < ' < I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or iniprovement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such ,projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): ________________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE_______________________ DATE _________ _ t[qMeL:tftE•iij(S:~tq~g~Z~9'ij;,~q&?HE$iQ{l'i;TIAl:gqI1;JlijN;ijJe,~)foort.:t:1>Nt1Y::i\J.i i(~r;;: ti~_;\:\~~:t::: :t::·s~:~L ,~.~'.l:S;; _::'.L:,_\,:.~'.'.,;;:,{ ,_},:::,,:;: :~ :\ ;.;~·,;. \, Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prev .. ention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account AcV O YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 )'ES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS-MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ~.fJ'.i~Q.Nft'i\ofl!p~7~el'l!Q°'N .. q.~~e'N1:x;~f::7'1't:fE~~::::.. .:1:2,':.:'.':.:::~;}f5~;r:r:;':iJ: .. _ .... , ·; ,. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(il Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME_______________ ··~·-~--.,. .. ,:;; .. :-... -= ... :-.,;:;,·~:-.;:-;;::;:.:---:-----:-----.,-;;;::;;:;;-;:;.;:.------:;:,~,:-.-:-,,~ .. .';:,;;-.,,, ~}:,'Aefficmrffi'cEilTIFlifATlo'f,l}?,l'."1;i;f'.c.~"'!f:5~h'£i~;;:y~~T•::::':s-.:.; · I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or constn,iction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenc for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). n~ d'('APPLICANT'S SJGNATURE '=d.:....::::~~:e::.__,e.__L~~~~:::::.---------- 'V' WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DATE ---'~'-'-.:....,:/fl_/_()_~=----- EsGil Corporation 1n Partttersliip witli (jovemment for tJJuifaing Safety DATE: April 12, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OeR LICANT 0 JURI 0 PL N REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK' NO.: 01-190 PCR02-80 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. PROJECT NAME: Emerald Lake Corporate Center -Metal stud cladding D D D D D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially cpmply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person 1 Date contacted: (by: ) ~ Fax #: REMARKS: A. Special inspection is required, the signer all complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. B. The first sheet of the original structu i n calculation of the project ( by Hope Engineering) shall be sealed and signed by the licensed engineer/ itect in the state of California responsible f~r their preparation. By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 4/5 trnsmtl.dot EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersnip witn (jovemment for '.Builaing Safetg DATE: March 27, 2002 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad ~CANT ~! D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: IfREV2) o \. l 9o (P~~ . .:tf%o j SET: I(REV2) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. PROJECT NAME: Emerald Lake Corporate Center -Metal stud cladding D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ron Gross 5465 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, CA 92127 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ron Gross ( v · J.-.f) Telephone #: (858) 552-8424 Date contacted: 3/i?/u;....(by: '\4-) Fax #: Mail.....-Telephone ~ Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 3/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad l(REV2) Cl. \90 March 27, 2002 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/19 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: l(REV2) DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: March 27, 2002 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Me_chanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. • To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. • Please indicate here if any changes· have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? D Yes D No Carlsbad I(REV2) ol. J 90 March 27, 2002 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. 3. Provide a copy of the approved set of plans and the original set of structural design calculations. Ad~itional corrections may follow. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad l(REV2) March 27, 2002 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: l(REJ.Jf.i) of. 190 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela DATE: March 27, 2002 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1525 Faraday Ave. Emerald Corporate Center -PCR0280 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:· V-lhr BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. Time Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance 1994 use Building Permit Fee / ..-1 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee =3 Repeats * Based on hourly rate Comments: D Other 0 Hourly 3j Hours* Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $360.ool $2aa.001 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5465 Morehouse Dr. / -:---~· Suite 165 San Diego Callfomia, 92121 858 5528424 FAX 858 552 8429 Nadal Architects Inc Architecture Planning Interiors Attention MICHAEL PETERSON Company City Of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue City Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone 760-602-2721 We are sending you: 181 prints D reproducibles Plan Check No. CB010190 1525 Faraday Ave Emerald Lake Corporate Center D specifications D original documents These are: 181 for your approval D per your request D for use on Job D signature Remarks: Letter of Transmittal Date March 18, 2002 Regarding EMERALD LAKE Nadel project no. 00403.00 Received by: via: Hand Delivery D invoices D Agreement D for your flies D ', . ., D information D for review and comment MICHAEL: Here are two copies of structural calculations for the metal studs at th~ EQ1er~ld Lake Project for review. The metal stud engineer. prepared the calcs and the project engineer has reviewed them. We are looking· for City approval so that the field will have an appr~l/ed· set on site. ,I • ~. •• • • . .· If enclosures listed above are not received, notify at once. cc: Very truly yours, Nadel Architects Inc • by . ·~ ,.i .....:.. ... 3 \ ,J _,_-J' CASA ENG-INEERING-Inc. Structural Design & Analysis #04302 Mriu 1:xcErrtoN TAKEN o M/I.K£CORRECT10Ns NOTEO Q RC::ECTED O RE.VISE AND RESUBMIT LJ SllBMIT SPECIFIED ITEM CHF.Cf;i~G IS ONi.Y FO~ GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ~:Y.~'!~N CONCEPT Of THE PROJECT ·~~DP.IAFJED LAKE .,,, _, V::m1 TH£ INrORMAT!ON GIVrn IN T~l~~ . -'l'IN N;T:ON SHOWN IS SUBJE~J: •. n-iJH~I~~ Oj Jij/;, Plf,NS AND SPEC,FICATtoNs. t.®~Kr~H8*c.l E CENTER OIMEilSlONS WHICH Si-i.~Ll BE CONFIRMED ... ljlp ,.eoi~~ · AT TH£ ms s1rE~Wl'ORE.fs~Ac!l~tl!f!l)lrt\.L CORPORATION CONJ'iRUCTt?N, ~O~OflW:{'ij W,i~l~;A!OjijjltTl(;!lj:ff.JiCf) RESEARCH CENTER 0 rHr.R TRAOtS, A,m-'ffi'f-tA, 11f:M;fo~~fRnJ.fifM~~lbt' . R(Vlf.WED BY: ~ !.I ;/11/tJ"le.:... , HO?F. f.N·~!Ni:ER!NG , OATE 03/05/02 PROJECT: Structural design and analysis for co!mections for exterior curtain walls plus reference cut detail ·on elevation CASA ENGINEERING Inc. 7950 Silverton Ave. Suite 210 San DieRo. CA 92126 Tel. (858) 695-2761 Fax (858) 695-3367 Table of Contents Structural Design And Analysis ................................................... P-1 -P-73 ' ' e H r IS . 'to' t{' -lfo 60 Go' ft.,~ <f.>" Ctio <f 1 R=> \Cq( • IB.08 I 9~a¼ \ <:f.(8 2.~((; lZ.88 i.t1.¼f == ) ~,~x 1.3>: c_ 1' / = I(~,~ =-\'1-.. (~rs-¥ C~ ~1-; 18.q C~ c.Jc~· P~ c.-J (_t)~,'l~ 'l 0. o( • ll~ 2Z.5' t 1.~ l 4.8 Z 1.' \j~~ Pw~ 'l,l(.g ~ tr f>-11=-I 9d i~sz. D ~~ ~w ~ .JopJ. t: ~ {Jw/1.1.J ~J ii.~ ps.'fG' < i(rJJ l-turl <) lo I ~ • ( ' . ! , ' ' ' ,, ' t-. t d' 8. ~\{:) ~ L 6 1 lt .k ~ 'A\ f-; ~L/jf) ~ J\LfS.> ~1z:·4.y,. t°'({ M~ ~ /.U \ ~-~\)l-l'\l'"-"-' f'\ \E f~ \~-=-(. 6~4 .=-1. 0 ~ ~l(4 \0 f'5 p ,4 \I £, ~ 4 'ltp.'.lr-- 1,,{" ps~ . . -, - -·---~"t~·~,-.::.~_ ..... _--I,.-:;-· _,. .. ,. :{:.: .. : ~ ... F~, DL1~ 716 OLz. .-:-~ Lf < ~ f_; I;:-. qO !61-lc Lts 1 rs~ =-)Y Ci Fvu, = \6~ i Fw'-' ~ 81- F \XJ f. = t{, 4- ~D12.!:>.dwg .. -~--- HALL SECTION@ DECK 114~~f 5 It M 1 r,<:,,_, ··· ·'3 :iw.1•••1ns AN!) WRII I EN ~IAll:HW APl'l'ARINO HEREIN CONS !I IUI C II~, Ol!IGlliAI-ANU UN>'VuUStil.D WORK OF 11 IE AIICH; It ;.1 I ,,_. au, ::iv.ti: W. YI I ' I ,{)l3~ i q5 DL4-= '-tfs CL:s-::: tr1I r:s~~ {}5 fS6:;, I BJ ( vd.1~ I J3 (ifJi,~ Jto Pw!5::-/13 f!Jl/6 $ 150 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ;... - 9 ~ 261---4--ll ~@ i bJ I _______ l!j~ ___ ./ ! ,: Ii r i ! ! ,:. ·_t>l6' ,~ I g B DL:i=-l-f s-o DG8=4 'ro F.s1-= 133 Fi8~ {8:3 .61= (01 .f wi::: JLti FUut3~ 1<-i,£ ~wfc 30 --=r- ~ _, '" -, --'l,,------>ic---------1-~Teo::-=--~,~~ I @ @ -----~~ I • I _a- -'I<------=--,... ----7 ----7" ~ S'f f\pJ.)1- Q _, ,I) 1!JW ALlJ-L Fill U!..oil. COVER tiq ==· £q:s DL \o= ½it5" Dlu== L,/t1~ Psto; toB rs II ~ I ob n_,i ~ i1 n 1 'J ::> ,t P''>'l{ .., [62.. f ..v /() .,, i q 8 r:w11.,.. t-1 -f w,~ _ u f W/3 ~ 4 · fw1~ .:-f fJ, ( l • ,,.·"~\~ ~ J 63 D\_VL (l\j -== Lt5S Dl I l1 ~ L1l-1 c; f """~ His:::. /~1 ~ I ~ fs ,t~ ]~] ~ I ¢1 tew<rSP>C.E. fj 11 ~ /0 ~ rs,s~ I 5J ©--= f;,g-~ /6L .i) • , !!) -.i) l'ENmTSP>Cf ' I (Q I j f\Jl./tx %0 I Cl.I~~ : :L s18 < M1 ~ 52_, £_ fuvr6,., i-Jo , ty 0J-I I q. -:: U6· fs1; ~ (wfl:; u6o I! .i) • !!) f0011~ l9J ~ TEWfil SP!ll:. • cfl 13 I -' · ··t::t1i~ J8t DLA~~ lti3 OLI~~ Lrz9 ~~-::; }o~ (<Jr.) 1,o 7 ~u=-loF ~ :r fs 2/l ~ I 08 ~\JI-!( (si3~ (Gt, i / f uU <t,;::, :::: cwo ~ FJ-t'r ff-wu.-:: la·..:> " ,P 06 1l ~ <u.J-? ~ iii Fr.JI.-'lJ ~ ) cJ\:) FWL.t.-DtL --~ -'L 2.- r,Ji,-{J > h.l ~ 1!l T..OP. ;- ,t\ 6~ ~ ~ JU C2,. ~ in 3,-p R.OOR 9 ©-::,. L~ 9 ;i, ~ q in 2NDR.OOR ~ ::,. ;> 9 ir• ·,· D.,l( I bL1 I I I } ~ ... I Cl/'} ~¼ AW.2 cz_ r1sol ~ ' ' bl-\~ --£.S)l JJ ~ l& I ~At'\K '4-S t \ ... 'T ~so\ Dl-l9 ~ \ 1 11.s-:::-utg TDP. U--~o ::::-\ 11 JJ-:: '12~ i" Fv1/l,(.,{-:: g./" .:si 1-'L _ ~ 2 ~ i-, in fU/4) f> 1,, u ~ '1 d,~ \l~ ::t F5w~ /@ X 1/2, ¥-'l-=. ~ ~ 2'-/ZI' \ (<JL,t/1 ~ I . [ . ; ~ c<\ @FLCQB Q . ~1-4 "' fv.--,,.,._ )-! l ! i ~ Q. i!I . ~ IDt~ tt ts,~ '? Q .:. I 2H!) . . ,----=:r~: .. ~ ~ Fsv-c-f(.,v{A i Q in 1 Q I ;;, tlt-1 ' ' .,• _,, '/ii,s:, q4, ~ 1--'& -:=::-IW ~ fsµ~ 94,~~ fu11 t / ,( ) "' ~ .-. &. r-t-7,, ~ j'l, -:? U_tl1 ~ ::t 9 .... r w~ ~ J "15 jt, -:;:-'15°0 f u&<t/4-:-/'Ji; J,k' 6 F~, ;<- F .Jt.rlt ~ J f2J rt-r --::: 1--7-3 . ' f~ j & ;----1i1 EAST.ENTRY SECTION h ,,_ .• '11' ;• fs:Pri == \U fs ~~ \11 ( Wi)g ~ l}3 fw~;J =-i,ll f UL-_$.;> -:,. z,,16 9 m:,Fl.OOR II ~ECESSED H.ALL SECT. \ 1? ., s z ~ ~11 ? 1? .. N's z l:3~ ' ~ ! I"'~-I 5 'L \Xl)~T ~ ~\ 3 ..StA w.'---r , q pc . •' ;, ~\a¼ ---ropccve) fu-\%11 (~j lt X y )<. 6 4 3 t> t-t \.£<\t Ltoo Ulo 0l-(] D l-0\ fvis Lrlft 20 lb. D43o t-<l 56 s 6t3 ! \1-+ DY.so 2--\ . -_~l-L.Q Lfoo \7-½f; 1 bLr3oi-J <;Jolt J%6 /5t~ Cl. 5ol jl{0~-4°j IY 6cr 6r,i Z31{ >O( ·{16g 4.oo CZ \tt / . . t. ' . :. ·--. ··•··· -·· ·-' . . . . . '·. ·, . ·. lL) ND >J~D 70 ~Ul.~ GG<p ,, , '"'-u--"*~ sir\ L~~ cVr ·vs~o ~ 1<J f ~ ~tD <r O t \--\ (0:)\)(.t-f ~ ~1 ~ l i ll-drl rt¢ o) Ji"O-t . { 4 ( t f'IA··Y: 6#lo StVO cP l6'0, C I 6 CtP rt r,~ ty f I cA L, W/JNf e,fl(tl [» rt Al ( 1 o a~ \~ I o!,66 ,L--/11 -\ ,~ (1) ~-c tt3 1-B -::;-ll~iu1··, I S-::: o.o+"'\ ~x ~ o ~ 15, q/1\ 6 /,61-~~~--L- (9 -1 \II --t .. ---------------·-¥--,,,.'f- - . 6 L'l·drl <¢ o)Jto t © '1-5/kJf f N ~ ({) - I, ' -Z.(( . Sp;:c(A-t.. l~CT'~~ Lt\ l/~ 16/i,Ax c./' LoH ~ · J 1,~v.l. @ -..:,.,,.'>-2-ouit _L l \ i"x l!CrA Col-\~ ~ · 2-0lbiF 5#10 ® StVO J) l61lJ. C lbv; ,' ,,) ½ · I ,.j/lU.,O u-p c:: ; ,c.,o:Y ~ S-o___ lj. l.(.{, \, Cf t 5/4 r u rr°' \ J ('-,1u \ + \_S.6l ) . 'T-= Z-r-1-i-2'f.q_ --=-J.'S" '-1 _ L ::::.(t 1 : -1-t)',5,...~ Zx .. $"°jy,or6'("' .o1'111r"" tJ ~ L("'f, 0 t66 --· Z,l{c., (~\ ... tc (+:: -6&s 11 .L ~ _lA-1 _ -= J J-, f (l I 6G(~ ' . ' . ' ,. .. f C/4\if ,:, · 2-?61.1,~ 4-G -:; 5. , b V ( t qi, (l} ~\.ki\---Qh) N = s,1~ ~ s~ 53-J \'.)St (' ---Sls1l <f.)f'J-J ,. .---~.--------------------------~\\ f Re~i.:!ts for LC t W1NO• DL CASA Engineering, Inc. KAMELZAYAT ;::: "' _ MB :-; ;:.· - ;::: "' .... .. .:: "' March 4, 2002 3:19 PM 04302-5.r2d ·Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) I N1 0 0 0 N2 D 5.5 0 N3 0 8 0 N4 0 13 0 NS 0 21.5 0 I N6 0 25 0 N7 0 4 0 N8 1 5.5 0 N9 1 21.5 0 N10 0 20 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads7 Category: None7 _BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) End M:E!gnitude (lb/ft, F) Start Location (ft or%} M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 I Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacementsz Category: None1 BLC 1 : WIND Joint label fl]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad} N4 L X 165 N3 L X 82 N1 L X 264 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label {L]oad or Direction Magnitude fDlisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N1 L X 144 N3 L X 45 N4 L X 90 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label N6 N3 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L L Direction y y RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302-5.r2dJ Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad} -396 -445 March 4, 2002 3:20 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%} 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 ,. ! I I i 'company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label XForce (lb) 1 NS 1034 1 N2 485.333 1 N7 -1095.333 1 N10 -1595 l 1 i N8 0 I .. Totals: -1171 l 1 COG (ft): X: 0 Load Combinations Y Force (lb) 396 445 0 0 I 0 I I 841 Y: 16.005 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 March 4, 2002 3:20 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 ! WlND+DL I 2 l SIESMIC+.9DL I 3 l Dl+Ll I i 4 I 3xSIESMlC+.9DL I Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL I I I I I I I I I l I I Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-5.r2d] . 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 I 3 3 .9 I Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 3 6 3 6 2 Page2 I i ,, ··company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 i N2 0 5.5 0 ! N3 0 8 0 N4 0 13 0 j NS 0 21.5 0 N6 0 25 0 N7 0 4 0 I N8 1 5.5 0 / N9 1 21.5 0 N10 0 20 ·o Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 End Magnitude (lbift, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None~ BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 .18 , Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC t : WIND Joint Label [l]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N4 L X 165 N3· L X 82 N1 L X 264 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude rDJisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N1 L X 144 N3 L X 45 N4 L X 90 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label N6 .N3 [l]oad or [D]isplacement L L Direction y y RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-5.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -396 -445 March 4, 2002 3:20 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) ·o 0 0 0 0 0 Page 3 J'Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label X Force (lb) 2 NS 564 2 N2 264 2 N7 -597 2 N10 -870 2 I N8 0 2 Totals: -639 2 COG (ft): X:O Load Combinations Y Force (lb) 356.4 400.5 0 0 0 756.9 Y: 16.005 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 March 4, 2002 3:20PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 I WIND+DL I 2 I SIESMIC+.9DL I 3 I Dl+LL j I 4 I 3xSIESMlC+.9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I l Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-5.r2d] 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 3 6 3 6 2 Page 4 2.. ' i I l I I I I I ,, "Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA YAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 5.5 0 N3 0 8 0 N4 0 13 0 NS 0 21.5 0 N6 0 25 0 N7 0 4 0 N8 1 5.5 0 N9 1 21.5 0 N10 0 20 b . Member Direct Distributed Loads1 Category: None,. BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 End M_agnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Meinber Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) . (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M1 X 18 18 , 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label -[L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N4 L X 165 N3 L X 82 N1 L X 264 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oador Direction Magnitude [Dlisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in. rad) N1 L X 144 N3 L X 45 N4 L X 90 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label N6 N3 IL]oad or [D]isplacement L L Direction y y RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-5.r.2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -396 -445 March 4, 2002 3:21 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ftor %) 0 ·o 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pages ' Z.1- 'company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label X Force (lb) 4 NS. 1692. 4 N2 792 4 N7 -1791 4 N10 -2610 i 4 I N8 0 4 Totals: -1917 4 COG (ft): X:O Load Combinations Y Force (lb) 356.4 400.5 0 0 . 0 756.9 Y: 16.005 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 March 4, 2002 3:21 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 i WIND+DL I 2 I SIESMIC+ .9DL i 3 l Dl+LL l 4 .i 3xSIESMlC+ .9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic load Case Description WIND SlESMIC DL LL I I I I f i I I I I I I Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 i 1 1 2 3 2 C$gery Description RlSA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-5.r2d] · 1 3 1 I 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 3 6 3 6 2 Page6 ·, ' ,, ·1, M7 -. MS M9 ,.,"'·· ,'t G<i:s-;:rs. f¢r tc i. \r,r.rir:.:-!:"r... ;..I_'---------'---,,--------------------------,------------~ CASA Engineering, Inc. March 4, 2002 KAMELZAYAT 3:38 PM 04302-4.r2d ,• i ·Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA YAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 3 0 N3 0 13.5 0 N4 0 16.5 0 NS 0 I 27 I 0 l N6 0 33 0 N7 0 1.5 0 NS 0 15 0 l N9 0 31.5 0 N10 0 0 0 N11 3 3 1 0 N12 3 16.5 0 N13 3 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction M1 X M2 X M3 X M4 X MS X M6 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft F) ' 33 33 33 33 33 33 . End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 Start Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F} (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M1 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 , 0 M4 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N4 N2 NS Ni N3 [LJoad or· [DJisplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X - ' ' Magnitude (lb lb-ft, in rad) 173 173 350 350 350 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [LJoad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I NS L X 189 I N3 L X 189 I N1 L X 189 I N2 L X 89 RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2dJ I I I ! March 4, 2002 3:39 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 l l ( I i Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 (continued) Joint Label N4 [LJoad or [D]isplacement L Direction X Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) '89 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L}oad or [D]isplacement I N2 L l N4 L j N6 L l Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 1 N2 1 N4 1 N6 1 N7 1 N8 1 N9 1 N11 1 Totals; 1 COG (ft): X Force (lb) 177 177 1248 -799 -799 -1796 0 -1792 X:O I Direction y y y Y Force (lb} 495 495 200 0 0 0 0 1190 Y: 13.658 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -495 -495 · -200 Moment 1 (ti;:.ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Load Combinations March 4, 2002 3:39 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 l WIND+DL I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 2 I SIESMIC+ .9OL I I I I 1 2 1 3 .9 3 ) DL+LL I I I I 1 3 1 . I 4 1 l 4 I 3.xS!ESMIC+. 90L I I l I 1 2 3 3 _g I Basic Load Case Data BLC No. Basic Load Case Descnption 1 WIND 2 StESMfC 3 DL 4 LL Category Code None None None None Category Desc. tio np n RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2dJ Gravity Load Type Totals X y omt 01nt irect ist. J. p· 0-0- 5 6 5 6 3 Page2 ' Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate (ft) N) 0 N2 0 N3 0 N4 0 NS 0 N6 0 N7 0 N8 0 N9 0 N10 0 N11 3 - N12 3 N13 3 Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (F) 0 0 3 0 13.5 0 16.5 0 27 0 33 0 1.5 0 15 0 31.5 0 0 6 3 1 0 16.5 0 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M1 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M5 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 . Member Direct Distributed Loads, category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M1 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 , 0 M4 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 . Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N4 N2 NS N1 N3 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L L l L L · Direction X X X X X Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 173 173 350 350 350 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [Dlisplacernent {lb, lb-ft, in, rad) NS L X 189 N3 L X 189 N1 L X 189 N2 L X 89 RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2d] March 4, 2002 3:39 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%} 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page3 27 ,. I I I j I j 'Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYA T Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category : None, BLC 2 {continued) Joint Label N4 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L Direction X Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 89 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or rD]isplacement i N2 L I N4 L I N6 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 2 N2 2 N4 2 N6 2 N7 2 N8 2 N9 ! 2 N11 2 Totals: 2 COG (ft): Load Combinations X Force (lb) 100 100 675 -432 -432 -972 0 -961 X:O j I I I Direction y y y Y Force {lb) 445.S 445.5 180 0 0 0 0 1071 Y: 13.658 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -495 -495 -200 MQ_ment 1 (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i l [ March 4, 2002 3:39 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 I WIND+Dl I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 2 l SIESMIC+.9DL j j I I 1 2 1 3 .9 3 i DL+LL I I I r 1 3 1 4 1 I I 4 I 3xSIESMlC+ .9DL ., I I I 1 2 3 3 .9 l I I Basic Load Case Data BLC No. Basic Load Case D escnptlon 1 WIND 2 S!ESMIC 3 DL 4 LL Category Cod e None None None None Category Desc .. nption RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2d] Gravity Load Type Totals X y omt omt Ir lst. J · P · o-ect o· 5 6 i 5 6 I 3 i 1 Page4 zt I ,• ·Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Oe!;iigner : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 i N2 D 3 0 N3 0 13.5 0 N4 0 16.5 0 I NS D 27 0 i I N6 0 33 0 I NI D 1.5 0 I N8 0 15 0 I N9 0 31.5 0 N10 0 0 -0 N11 3 3 " 0 N12 3 16.5 0 N13 3 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) . (ftor %) M1 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 I 33 0 . Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M1 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 \ 0 M4 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 . Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None7 BLC 1 : WIND Joint label N4 N2 NS N1 N3 [LJoad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad} 173 173 350 350 350 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [l]oad or Direction Magnitude fDlispfacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I NS I L X 189 I I I N3 I L X 189 l N1 I L X 189 I N2 I L X 89 RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2dJ March 4, 2002 3:57 PM Checked By: __ End location (ft or%) 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 zq ,• 'Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: March 4, 2002 3:57 PM Checked By: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category : None, BLC 2 (continued) Joint Label N4 [LJoad or [DJisplacement I. L Direction X Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 89 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements1 Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [LJoad or fD]isplacement I N2 L I N4 L I N6 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 4 N2 4 N4 4 N6 4 N7 4 N8 4 N9 4 I N11 4 Totals: 4 COG (ft): Load Combinations I. X Force (lb) 300 300 2025 -1296 -1296 -2916 0 -2883 X:O Direction y y y Y Force (lb) 445.5 445.5 180 0 0 0 0 10/1 Y: 13.658 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -495 -495 -200 MQ..ment 1 (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 I WIND+DL I 2 I SIESMlC+.9DL L 3 I DL+LL ! 4 I 3xSIESMIC+ .9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 I Basic Load Case Desc. tio np n WIND SlESMIC DL LL I I ! I l I I I I I I I Category Cod e None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 l 1 1 2 3 2 Category Desc. ti np on RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-4.r2dJ 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 , 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y oint 01 1rect 1st. J · P ·nt o· o- 5 I 6 5 I 6 3 I I Pages &.x ' -! R~ultSft>rLC·1. V¥':N~DL I i CASA Engineering, Inc. I KAMEL ZAYAT I ·-~ M12 ---· . :n~:¼...,.., ____;;M;.;.11'--~·-; '.O ::: • O> -~- M10 :-: ,;:,. 1~.r.-:': ::: "' -~-- i March 4, 2002 j ! 4:14 PM I 04302-2.r2d i I 'Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 7.5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 NS 0 18 0 i N6 0 21 0 ! I N7 0 27 0 I N8 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 0 N11 0 16.5 1 0 --· Ni2 0 29.5 ' 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 ,. 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X. 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) Mt X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0, M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 Mi X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [L)oad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RLSA \04302-2.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 198 198 198 99 99 I March 4, 2002 4:14 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: March 4; 2002 4:14 PM Checked By:_ Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude fDJisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 163 N4 L X 163 N1 L X 163 N3 L X 82 : N6 L X i 82 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label 1 NB 1 NS 1 N2 1 N10 1 N11 1 N12 1 N13 1 Totals: 1 COG (ft): Load Combinations X Force (lb) 176 -24.75 -24.75 -519.75 -519.75 -605 0 -1518 X:O Direction y y y YForce (lb) 693 445 445 0 0 0 0 1583 Y: 22.896 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I r Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ -693 -445 -445 Num Description Env WS PD CO BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor l 1 I WIND+DL 1 2 I SfESMIC+ .9DL . ! 3 I DL+LL I 4 I 3xSIESMIC+.9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL ! I I l I I I I I I l I Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2.r2d] 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 I Gravity · Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 5 9 5 9 3 ' Page2 ! ·Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 I 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 7.5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 l NS 0 18 0 N6 0 21 0 ! N7 0 27 0 NS 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 0 N11 0 16.5 ' 0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 N!6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 . 33 O· M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction M7 X M8 X M9 X M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302-2.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) "198 198 198 99 99 I I I I I March 4, 2002 4:15 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page3 I I l ! ! I I Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None: BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isolacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 I L X I 163 N4 I L X I 163 N1 I L X I 163 N3 l L X I 82 N6 I L X I 82 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [LJoad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 2 NB 2 NS 2 N2 2 N10 2 N11 2 N12 2 N13 2 Totais: 2 COG {ft): Load Combinations X Force (lb) 187.667 12.5 12.5 -392.5 -392.5 -476.66/ -0 -1049 X:O Direction y y y Y Force (lb) 623.7 400.5 400.5 0 0 0 0 1424.7 Y: 22.896 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I- Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., -693 -445 -445 March 4, 2002 4:15 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CO BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 j WINO+DL I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 ! I 2 I S!ESMIC+ .9DL l l I I 1 2 1 3 .9 I I I . 3 j DL+LL I I I I 1 3 1 4 1 4 I 3xSlESMlC+ .9DL 1 1 1 I 1 2 3 3 .9 Basic Load Case Data r BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2.r2dJ Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 5 9 5 9 3 Page4 Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate . Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) I N1 0 0 0 I N2 0 4.5 0 ' N3 0 7.5 0 ' I N4 0 13.5 0 I NS 0 18 0 l N6 0 21 0 I N7 0 27 0 N8 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 0 N11 0 16.5 ~ 0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 . 33 0 M4 X '33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2: SJESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M7 X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 I M1 X 18 18 0 I Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [LJoad or {Dftsplacement L , l... L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) · 198 198 198 99 99 March 4, 2002 4:15 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 ,, I f I I Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [DJisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X I 163 N4 L X I 163 N1 L X I 163 N3 L X I 82 N6 L X I 82 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label 4 NB 4 NS 4 N2 4 N10 4 N11 4 N12 4 I N13 4 Totals: 4 COG (ft): Load Combinations XForce (lb) 563. 37.5 37.5.' -1111.s· -1177.5 -1430 0 -3147 X:O Direction y y y Y Force (lb) 623.7 400.5 400.5 0 0 0 0 1424.7 Y: 22.896 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I- Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -693 -445 -445 March 4, 2002 4:15 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 I W!ND+DL ! l j I 1 1 1 3 1 I i 2 l SlESMIC+ .90L I I I I 1 2 .. 3 I .9 l - 3 I DL+LL I I I I 1 3 1 4 1 4 I 3xSlESMIC+.9DL I I I j 1 2 3 3 .9 Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 I 2 I 3 ! 4 I Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2.r2d] Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist s 9 5 9 3 I Pages ! I ' ' ~ , , . Q ft.x ~-~ ! ~ -M12 *t-1='·-· .. ., ;:: "' -~, ;:: "' - ,j ;:: -;;: I j ~' M11 .. ~, --~·~ ;:: "' -~· ;:: ! Q>, i -I ' I ~ i i "' I ,, . ~ M10 :~ ;o:--,!,~--, ~ I -~_ .. i ! ;:: .., I I Rest.fits :Or lC 1. Vf.ND-a-DL I ' \ CASA Engineering, Inc. Ma~ch 4, 2002 / KAMELZAYAT 4:36 PM I 04&l2-1.r2d I I ,. i 'Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 N5 0 18 0 N6 0 18.5 0 N7 0 27 0 N8 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 0 N11 0 16.5 0 N12 0 29.S 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category·: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label M7 M8 M9 M6 MS M4 M3 M2 M1 Direction X X X X X X X X X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 . End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude . Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 r .. 111 X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 I N1 N3 N6 [LJoad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2dJ I ! I j I I Magnitude (lb, lb-ft. in, rad) 280 280 291 140 140 March 4, 2002 4:36 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 ,. -' ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: March 4, 2002 4:36 PM Checked By: __ Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude rDlisplacement ( lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 163 N4 L X 163 N1 L X 163 N3 L X 82 i N6 I L I X 82 i Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label 1 NB 1 NS 1 N2 1 N10 1 N11 1 N12 1 N13 1 Totals: 1 COG {ft): Load Combinations X Force (lb) 312.667 428.333 462.333 -1064.333 -1013.333 -823.667 0 -1698 X:O Direction y y y Y Force (lb) 363 445 445 0 0 0 0 1253 Y:· 18.196 Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad} 1- Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -363 -445 -445 Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 I VVIND+DL I 2 I SIESMJC+. 9DL . I 3 I DL+LL I 4 I 3xSIESM!C+ .9Dl Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description · WIND SIESMIC DL LL I l I I l I I I l I I I Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2d] 1 3 1 I 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 5 9 5 9 3 Page 2 40 ' ' I I I l I l I I ,. Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) {F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 NS 0 18 0 N6 0 18.5 0 N7 0 27 0 NS 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 ·o N11 0 16.5 -0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loa~s, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Labef Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lblft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 a M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 . 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M7 X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X i8 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M1 X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 Ni N3 N6 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 280 280 297 140 140 March 4, 2002 4:37 PM Checked By: __ End Location . (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 3 41 ! I I i ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 2 : SJESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 163 N4 L X 163 N1 L X 163 N3 L X 82 N6 i L X 82 I Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None. BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [LJoad or Direction Magnitude [D}isplacement (lb,. lb-ft, in, rad) N9 L y I -363 N6 L y -445 N3 L y -445 Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label X Force Y Force Moment (lb) (lb) (lb-ft) 2 NB 187.667 326.7 0 2 NS 246.667 400.5 0 2 N2 246.667 400.5 0 2 N10 -581.667 0 0 2 N11 -581.667 0 0 2 N12 -476.667 0 0 2 N13 0 o. 0 2 Totals: -959 1127.7 2 COG (ft): X:O Y: 18.196 Load Combinations t, March 4, 2002 4:37 PM Check~d By: __ Num Description Env WS PO CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 I W!ND+DL i 1 I I 1 1 1 3. i I 2 I SlESMIC+.9DL I I I I 1 2 .. 3 .9 I 3 I DL+LL I ! I I 1 3 1 4 1 4 I 3xSIESMIC+. SOL I I I I 1 2 3 3 .9 Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SlESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2d] Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 5 I 9 5 I 9 3 I I I Page 4 ' ' ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA YAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 NS 0 18 i 0 N6 0 18.5 0 I Nt 0 27 I 0 I N8 0 31 0 N9 0 34 0 N10 0 3 0 N11 0 16.5 -0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 M5 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SJESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%) M7 X 18 18 0 . M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M1 X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Joint ,Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [L]oad or [O]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2dJ ' ' Magnitude (lb lb-ft, in rad) 280 280 297 140 140 March 4, 2002 4:37 PM Checked By: __ _ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: March 4, 2002 4:37 PM Checked By:_ Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 2 : S/ESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [DJispfacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X I 163 N4 L X I 163 N1 L X I 163 N3 L X I 82 N6 I L X l 82 I Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N9 L y • -363 N6 L y --445 N3 L y -445 Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label XForce YForce Moment (lb) (lb) (lb-ft) 4 N8 563 326.7 0 4 NS 740 400.5 0 4 N2 740 400.5 0 4 N10 -1745 0 0 4 N11 -1745 0 0 4 N12 -1430 0 -0 4 l N13 0 0 0 4 Totals: -2877 1127.7 4 COG (ft}: X:O Y: 18.196 Load Combinations Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor ' i I WlND+Dl ' L J-2 i SIESMIC+ .9Dl , l 3 I DL+LL l 4 j 3xSIESM1C+.9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL I I I I I I I I ! I I I Category Code None None None None i 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-1.r2d] 1 3 1 I I ! ! 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 5 9 5 9 .3 Page 6 l ! 1 . ' I y ! Ii.x i '. ~c M12 i /.i'J--,-.:1: ;:: "' I -~: l i ;:: t,J \ l I i ' ;:: I :;;: I I i 1 - .:~ ;:: .. M11 ,; " - ;:: (JI -~: ;:: 0) . ... ~ < !£ c., , ./ , .,-:: ;:: "' M10 f ;;.. ~...J- § --. ,· ~ R~u!ts foi LC ~-Vt'JND+DL I l CASA Engineering, Inc. March 4, 2002 KAMEL ZJ1. YAT 4:44PM 04302-2a501.r2d .. I Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 7.5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 NS 0 18 0 N6 0 21 0 N7 0 26 a I N8 0 31 0 N9 0 31.S .0 N10 0 3 I • 0 N11 0 16.5 f,-0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, Fl (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) I M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 . 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M7 , X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 M1 X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [L]oad or [D]isplacement L L L L L Direction I X I X I X I I X I X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302-2a501.r2d] I ! I r I I Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 200 200 300 100 100 I I i I I March 4, 2002 4:44 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Page 1 ,_ •' l I I I ! Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 108 N4 L X 108 N1 L X 163 N3 L X 42 N6 L X 42 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Jointlabe! [L]oad or [D]isplacernent N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 1 N8 1 NS 1 N2 1 N10 1 N11 1 N12 1 N13 1 Totals: 1 COG (ft): X Force (lb) 557.417 -23.75 176.25 -823.75 -523.75 -938.917 0 -1576.5 X:O I Direction y y y YForce (lb) 363 429 429 0 0 0 0 1221 Y: 19.378 Magnitude (!b, lb-ft, in, rad) ,- Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'I -363 -429 -429 Load Combinations March 4, 2002 4:44 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC I Factor BLC Factor BLC F.actor 1 I \IVIND+DL I l i I 1 1 1 3 1 2 I SIESMIC+.$0L j I l j 1 2 1 3 .9 3 I DL+LL I , I I I 1 3 1 4 1 4 I 3xS!ESMIC+ .9Dl I I I I 1 2 3 3 .9 Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 l 2 I 3 i 4 I Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 {C:\RISA\04302-2a501.r2d] Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 5 I 9 I 5 I 9 3 . I I Page2 I ! ' i ,' Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL 'ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) I N1 0 0 0 I N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 7.5 0 I N4 0 13.5 0 I NS 0 18 [ 0 l ' I I N6 0 21 0 I I ! N7 0 26 I 0 I i I N8 0 31 I 0 N9 0 31.5 p N10 0 3 " 0 N11 0 16.5 -0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SJESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) lb/ft, F) (ftor % M7 ·' X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 .x 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 18 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 L. Mi X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 [L]oador [O]isplacement L L L L L Direction X X X X X RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2a501.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 200 200 300 100 100 I l ! I I March 4, 2002 4:45 PM Checked By: __ E nd Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 En d Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 3 ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: March 4, 2002 4:45 PM Checked By: __ Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : S/ESM/C Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude fDlispfacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 108 N4 L X 108 N1 L X 163 N3 L X 42 N6 L X 42 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements1 Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label [L]oad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label 2 N8 2 NS 2 N2 2 N10 2 N11 2 .. N12 2 N13 2 Totals: 2 COG (ft): Load Combinations N um D escnption i 1 I WIND+DL J 2 I SlESMlC+.9DL I 3 I DL+LL i4 j 3xSIESMIC+.9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 I Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL E I I I I nv X Force (lb) 301.5 22.5 132.5 -472.5 -307.5 -508.5 0 -832 X: 0 ws I l I I I I I I Category Code None None None None PD I I I I Direction y y y YForce (lb) 326.7 386.1 386.1 0 0 0 0 1098.9 Y: 19.378 CD BLC 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302-2a501.r2dJ F Magnitude (lb, lb-ff, in, rad) Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -363 -429 -429 actor B LC Factor 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity BLC Factor BLC Factor Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. 5 9 5 9 3 Page4 ' I . ' ,. Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 4.5 0 N3 0 7.5 0 N4 0 13.5 0 NS 0 18 0 N6 0 21 0 N7 0 26 0 NS 0 31 0 N9 0 31.5 0 N10 0 3 . 0 N11 0 16.5 -0 N12 0 29.5 0 N13 3 4.5 0 N14 3 18 0 N15 3 31 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND r Member Labef Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ft or%} M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 . 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F} (lb/ft, F} (ftor %) M7 -X 18 18 0 M8 X 18 18 0 M9 X 18 18 0 M6 X 18 18 0 MS X 18 18 0 M4 X 18 1-8 0 M3 X 18 18 0 M2 X 18 18 0 f\./11 ., X 18 18 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label N7 N4 N1 N3 N6 {L]oad or [O]isplacement L .L L L L Direction I X I X l X I X l X RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302-2a501.r2dJ Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) 200 200 300 100 100 March 4, 2002 4:45 PM Checked By:_ End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 . ' I I I l .. •' Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number : · Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint label [l]oad or Direction Magnitude fDlisolacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I N7 L X 108 I N4 L X 108 i N1 L X 163 I N3 L X 42 ' ! N6 L X 42 I Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint label [l]oad or [D]isplacement N9 L N6 L N3 L Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label I 4 ' NB I 4 N5 4 N2 4 N10 4 N11 4 N12 4 N13 4 Totals: 4 COG (ft): Load Combinations XForce (lb) 904.5 67.5 397.5 -1417.5 -922.5 -1525.5 a -2496 X:O Direction y y y Y Force (lb) 326.7 386.1 386.1 0 0 0 0 1098.9 Y: 19.378 I Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) I- Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -363 -429 -429 I I March 4, 2002 4:45 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC , Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 I WIND+DL I I i l 1 1 i 3 1 l 2 I SIESMIC+.9DL l I I I 1 2 1 3 .9 . 3 I DL+LL I I I I 1 3 1 4 1 l I 4 I 3xSIESMIC+.9DL I I j I 1 2 3 3 .9 Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302-2a501.r2d] Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 5 9 I 5 9 I 3 I I Page6 i 52 ,• ,---.-~-.----------------------------------------------, &.x ~ M12 ;ti.?,,-": ·1"': ;:: "' -bo-:-· .. ;:: "' ~ ·- •,.: .. ~ ... . . . . J ~--· ;:: ... M11 y.r~-~~--:. ;:: "' -...... ;:: "' \ !. CASA Engineering, Inc. March 4, 2002 KAMELZAYAT 4:55 PM Q4304-4a501.r2d Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F} N4 0 16 0 I NS 0 18 0 N6 0 18.5 0 ' N7 0 26 0 N8 0 31 I 0 N9 0 31.5 0 N11 0 16.5 0 N12 0 29.5 0 N14 3 18 p N15 3 31 a 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) End Magnitude (lb/ft, F} Start Location (ftor %) M6 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 . 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 ; 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label Direction M6 X M5 X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F} 18 18 18 18 18 18 . Start Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) Nt L X 350 N4 L X 778 N6 L X 175 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label {LJoad or Direction Magnitude fDlispfacement (lb, lb-ft, in. rad) N7 L X 188 N4 L X 414 N6 L X 95 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint label N9 N6 [L)oad or [O]isplacement L L Direction y y RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04304-4a501.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -266 -692 March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 I '-. ' J' Company : CASA Engineering, Inc .. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label X Force (lb) 1 N8 907.417 1 NS -15.25 1 N11 -1020.25 1 N12 -1438.917 I 1 N14 0 I 1 Totals: -1567 1 COG (fl): X: O Load Combinations YForce (lb) 266 692 0 0 0 958 Y: 22.11 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 I WIND+DL I 2 I SIESMJC+ .9DL ! 3 I DL+LL ! 4 I 3xSIESMlC+ .9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMJC DL LL l I I I I l I I I I I I Category Code None None None None I 1 I 1 l 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04304-4a501.r2d] . 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist. I 3 i 6 3 I 6 2 i I Page 2 I .. 'company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N4 0 16 0 NS 0 18 0 N6 0 18.5 0 N7 0 26 0 N8 0 31 0 N9 0 31.5 0 I N11 0 16.5 0 N12 0 29.5 0 ! N14 3 18 0 I N15 3 31 , 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 Encl Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 33 33 33 33 33 33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None. BLC 2: S/ESMIC Member Label Direction M6 X MS X M4 X M3 X M2 X M1 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft. F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [LJoad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 I L X 350 N4 L X 778 N6 L X 175 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint label {L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 188 N4 L X 414 N6 L X 95 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label N9 N6 {L]oad or [D]isplacement L L Direction y y RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04304-4a501.r2d] Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -266 -692 March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 3 i ,• Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Reactions. By Combination LC Joint Label X Force (lb) I 2 N8 488.167 I 2 NS -11.167 I 2 N11 -542.833 ' I 2 N12 -775.167 i 2 l N14 0 I 2 Totals: -841 l 2 COG (ft): X:O Load Combinations YForce (lb) 239.4 622.8 0 0 I 0 I 862.2 Y: 22.11 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 i I March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor i 1 I WlND+DL I 2 I SIESMIC+ .9DL I 3 I DL+LL \ I 4 I 3xSlESMlC+.9DL Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL I I I I ! I I I I I l I Category Code None None None None· I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2· 3 2 Ga!egory Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04304-4a501.r2d] ·1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 3 6 3 6 2 Page4 ! ! I ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) {ft) (F) I N4 0 16 0 NS 0 18 0 N6 0 18.5 0 N7 0 26 0 N8 0 31 0 ! N9 0 31.5 0 N11 0 16.5 0 N12 0 29.5 0 N14 3 18 Q N15 3 31 , 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, .BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) Start Location (ft or%) M6 X 33 33 0 M5 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 a M3 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M1 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMIC Member Label M6 M5 M4 M3 M2 M1 Direction X X X X X X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude · (lb/ft, F} 18 18 18 18 18 18 ' Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 350 N4 L X 778 N6 L X 175 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMIC Joint Label {LJoad or Direction Magnitude fDJisplacement {lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N7 L X 188 N4 L X 414 N6 L X 95 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Joint Label N9 N6 {L]oad or [D]isplacernent L L Direction y y RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C;\RISA\04304--4a501.r2dJ Magnitude (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) -266 -692 March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ End Location {ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 End location {ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label X Force (lb} 4 N8 1464.5 4 NS -33.5 4 N11 -1628.5 4 N12 -2325.5 : 4 r N14 I 0 4 Totals: -2523 4 COG (ft.): X: O Load Combinations YForce (lb) 239.4 622.8 0 0 I 0 862.2 Y: 22.11 Moment (lb-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 March 4, 2002 4:55 PM Checked By: __ Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor I 1 i WIND+DL I 2 I SIESMlC+ .9DL I 3 1 DL+LL I I 4 l 3xS!ESMIC+ .9DL I Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESM!C DL LL I I I I I I I I I I I I Category Code None None None None i 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 3 2 Category Description RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04304-4a501.r2d] . 1 3 1 1 3 .9 1 4 1 3 3 .9 Gravity Load Type Totals X y Joint Point Direct Dist 3 6 3 6 ' 2 Page6 ). ._, --- Is: "' .:. '~. '; --, ' CASA Engineering, Inc. March 4, 2002 KAMELZAYAT 6:00 PM 04302wall.r2d ,_ ,, Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA YAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (Fl I N1 0 0 0 I N2 0 9 0 I N3 0 13 0 ! N4 0 22 0 NS 0 26 0 N6 0 35 0 N7 0 40 0 N8 0 42.66 0 I N9 0 11.5 0 N10 0 24.5 1 0 N11 0 38.5 -0 N12 D 16 0 N13 0 29 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lblft. F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M1 X 33 33 0 M2 X -33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 M5 X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 M7 X 33 . 33 0 M8 X 33 33 . D M9 X 33 33 0 M10 X 33 33 0 M12 X 33 33 0 M11 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : S/ESMIC Member label Direction M1 X M2 X M3 X M4 X MS X M6 X Mt X MS X M9 X M10 X M12 X M11 X Start Magnitude· (lblft. F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) M1 y -33 -33 M2 y -33 -33 RISA-2O Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA \04302wall.r2dJ Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%} 0 0 Page 1 ,_ .. I i I i ! l I I I I I ., Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category : None, BLC 3 {continued} Member Label Direction M3 y M4 y MS y M6 y M7 y M8 y M9 y M10 y M12 y M11 y Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements. Category: None,-BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude fDlisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2 L X 216 N4 L X 216 N6 L X 216 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 2 : SIESMJC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2' L X 117 N4 L X 117 N6 L X 126 Reactions, By Combination LC Joint Label XForce YForce Moment- (lb) (lb) (lb-ft) 1 N1 -148.5 214.5 0 1 N3 156.5 429 0 J 1 NS 74 445.5 0 1 N7 619.388 318.78 0 1 N9 . -851 0 0 1 N10 -719 0 0 1 N11 -1247.168 0 0 1 Totals: -2055.78 1401 .78 1 COG (ft): X:O Y: 21.33 Load Combinations i I l I March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l i I i Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 I WIND+DL I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 2 I SIESMIC+.9DL I I I I 1 2 1 3 .9 3 I DL+LL ! I I j 1 3 1 4 1 4 I 3xSIESMfC+. 9DL I I I I 1 2 3 3 .9 I 1111,..,~ ,i,. A ?('\('\~ . Company 6:01 PM . Checked By:_ ' ! I l ! f I I Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 I 0 0 N2 0 9 0 ' N3 0 13 0 I N4 0 22 0 NS a 26 0 ' N6 a 35 0 N7 0 40 0 N8 0 42.66 0 N9 0 11.5 .0 N10 0 24.5 .. 0 N11 0 38.5 -0 N12 0 16 0 ' N13 0 29 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lblft, F) (ftor %) M1 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 MS X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M10 X 33 33 0 M12 X 33 33 0 M11 X 33 33 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Catego,y: None, BLC 2 : SJESMIC Member Label Direction M1 X M2 X M3 X M4 X MS X M6 X M7 X M8 X M9 X M10 X M12 X M11 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 I End Magnitude (lblft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 3 : DL Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) M1 y -33 -33 M2 y -33 -33 RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 JC:\RISA \04302wall.r2d] Start Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ft or%) 0 0 Page 4 ,(' .. Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA VAT Job Number: Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 3 (continued) Member Label Direction M3 y M4 y MS y M6 y M7 y MS y M9 y M10 y i M12 y l M1i y Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 End Magnitude (lblft, F) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 I Start location (ft or%} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None,-BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [Dlisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2 L X . 216 N4 L X 216 N6 L X j 216 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : S/ESMIC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2 L X 117 N4 L X 117 N6 L X 126 Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label X Force YForce Moment· (lb) (lb) (lb-ft} 2 I N1 -81 193.05 0 2 I N3 84 386.1 0 2 i NS 39 400.95 0 ' 2 I N7 389.666 286.902 0 2 I N9 . -462 ·o 0 2 i N10 -390 0 0 2 I N11 -707.546 0 0 2 I Totals: -1127.88 1267.002 2 I COG (ft): X:O Y: 21.33 Load Combinations I March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Check~d By: __ End location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! i I · Num Description Env WS PD CD BlC Factor BLC Factor BlC Factor BLC Factor ! 1 i WIND+DL I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 i ! i 2 j SIESMlC+ .9DL I I I I 1 2 1 3 .9 I 3 I DL+LL I .I I I 1 3 1 4 I 1 l ! 4 I 3xSIESM!C+.9DL I l I I. 1 2 3 3 .9 I I ! I RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302wall.r2d] Page 5 1 I i ! I Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 IC:\RISA\043Q2wall.r2dJ Gravity X y I I f l March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Check~d By: __ Load Type Totals Joint Point Direct Dist 3 I 12 3 l 12 I 12 I Page6 I' '. Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Joint Coordinates Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (ft) (ft) (F) N1 0 0 0 N2 0 9 0 N3 0 13 0 N4 0 22 0 I NS 0 26 0 I I N6 0 35 0 N7 0 40 0 N8 0 42.66 0 N9 0 11.5 ·o N10 0 24.5 i 0 N11 0 38.5 0 N12 0 16 0 N13 0 29 0 Member Direct Distributed Loads, category: None, BLC 1 : WIND Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) (ftor %) M1 X 33 33 0 M2 X 33 33 0 M3 X 33 33 0 M4 X 33 33 0 i MS X 33 33 0 M6 X 33 33 0 M7 X 33 33 0 M8 X 33 33 0 M9 X 33 33 0 M10 X 33 33 ' 0 i M12 X 33 33 0 l M11 X 33 33 0 Member D!rect Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 2 : S/ESMIC Member Label · • Direction M1 X M2 X I M3 X M4 X MS X M6 X ! M7 X M8 X ~ iv19 X i M10 X l M12 X i M11 X Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 .. 18 18 Member Direct Distributed Loads. Category: None, BLC 3: DL Member Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) (lb/ft, F) M1 y -33 -33 M2 y -33 -33 RISA-2D Basic Version 5.~ [C:\RISA \04302wall.r2d) Start Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Check~d By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ftor %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Location (ftor %) 0 0 Page 7 I l ! ,. Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Member Direct Distributed Loads, Category: None, BLC 3 {continued) Member Label Direction M3 y M4 .Y MS y M6 y I M7 y I M8 y i 'M9 y M10 y M12 y M1i y Start Magnitude (lb/ft, F) .,.33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 l End Magnitude (lb/ft, F) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 Start Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None. BLC 1 : WIND Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [DJisplacement (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2 L X 216 N4 L X 216 N6 L X 216 Joint Loads/Enforced Displacements, Category: None, BLC 2 : SIESMJC Joint Label [L]oad or Direction Magnitude [D]isplacernent (lb, lb-ft, in, rad) N2 L X 117 N4 L X 117 N6 L X 126 Reactions, By Combination LC Joint label X Force Y Force Moment (lb) (lb) (lb-ft) 4 N1 -243 193.05 0 4 N3 252 386.1 0 4 NS 117 400.95 0 4 N7 1168.999 286.902 0 4 N9 . -1386 0 0 4 N10 -1170 0 0 4 N11 -2122.639 0 0 4 Totals: -3383.64 1267.002 4 COG (ft): X:O Y: 21.33 Load Combinations March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Checked By: __ End Location (ft or%) 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! ! Num Description Env WS PD CD BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor : 1 I WIND+Dt I I I I 1 1 1 3 1 I 2 I SIESMlC+.90L I I I I 1 2 1 3 .9 I 3 I DL+LL I l l l 1 3 1 4 1 I 4 I. 3xSIESMIC+ .SOL l l I I 1 2 I 3 3 .9 j I I RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302wall.r2d] Page 8 I • t' . . Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZAYAT Job Number: Basic Load Case Data BLC No. 1 2 3 4 Basic Load Case Description WIND SIESMIC DL LL Category Code None None None None Category Description RISA-20 Basic Version 5.5 [C:\RISA\04302wall.r2d] Gravity X y March 4, 2002 6:01 PM Checked By:_ Load Type Totals Joint Point Direct Dist. 3 12 I 3 12 I 12 i I Page 9 r ; ' .• Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMELZAYAT Job Number: Member Section Forces, By Combination LC Member Label Section 4 M1 1 2 3 4 ! 5 4 M2 1 I 2 ! I I 3 4 5 4 M3 1 2 3 4 5 4 M4 1 2 3 4 5 4 MS 1 2 3 4 5 4 M6 1 2 3 4 5 4 M7 1 2 3 4 5 4 M8 1 2 3 4 5 4 M9 1 2 3 4 5 4 M10 1 2 3 4 ,:; .., 4 M11 1 2 Axial (lb) 193.05 126.225 59.4 -7.425 -/4.25 -74.25 -92.812 -111.375 -129.937 -148.5 -148.5 -159.638 -1 t0.775 -181.912 -193.05 103.95 59.4 -14.85 -29.7 -74.25 -74.25 -92.812 -111.375 -129.937 -148.5 -148.5 -159.638 -170.775 -181.912 -193.05 118.8 74.25 29.7 -14.85 -59.4 -59.4 -85.387 -111.375 -137.362 -163.35 -163.35 -174.487 -185.625 -196.762 -207.9 79.002 59.251 39.501 19.75 0 207.9 185.625 I Shear (lb) 243 121.5 0 -121.5 -243 -594 -627.75 -661.5 -695.25 -729 657 636.75 616.5 596.25 576 162 81 0 -81 -162 -513 -546.75 -580.S -614.25 '-648 522 501.75 481.5 461.25 441 162 81 0 -81 -162 -540 -587.25 -634.5 -681.75 -729 1393.639 1373.389 1353.139 1332.889 1312.639 143.64 107.73 71.82 35.91 0 324 283.5 RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 (C:\RISA \04302wall.r2d] i I Moment (lb-ft) 0 -410.062 -546.75 -410.063 0 0 381.797 784.687 1208.672· 1653.?5 ··1653.75 1411.172 1176.187 948.797 729 0 -182.25 -243 -182.25 0 0 331.1{2 683.437 1056.797 1451.25 1451.25 1259.297 1074.937 898.172 729 ! 0 -182.25 -243 -182.25 0 0 493.172 1027.687 1603.547 2220.75 2220.75 1701.932 1190.708 687.0rB 191.041 191.041 107.461 47.76 11.94 0 729 501.187 March 4, 2002 6:32 PM Check~d By: __ Page 1 . .. •• Company : CASA Engineering, Inc. Designer : KAMEL ZA.YAT Job Number: Member Section Forces, By Combination, {continued) LC Member Label Section 3 ! 4 5 4 M12 1 2 3 4 5 Axial (lb) 163.35 141.075 118.8 193.05 170.775 148.5 126.225 103.95 RISA-2D Basic Version 5.5 [C;\RISA\04~02wall.r2d] Shear (lb) 243 202.5 162 324 283.5 · 243 202.5 162 Moment (lb-ft) 303.75 136.687 0 729 501.187 303.75 136.687 0 , March 4, 2002 6:32PM Check~ By: __ Page2 .. ,. ® i r---/(ct© ~ 600 \ % lo sJ t 0-~ 0 ' ) { I ~ \ .~ lf \ h ''> , { er II ~ 1$' . . V. . . . . · ~-·· ·f'. -·7.~-.. .. . . "' ·v~.. . . : •. · • • •• ~. 7' • I . . .. . .· .. :7,. .. ,,.:· . . .. . . V ,-. . . r,_IIJ: ? • . T53X3>G/16' •..ct>'OC • : ... ; •• °.d" • • -.. • <l ·1· <I .. • ... _ •• • ·". •••• ~··., • '(/ • "° .d • < 4 · ' · : LI . PL-"#:--f 4 • ':' A:_ . ~4 • ~'41 ·4 :.-·• :· • ,q" • • • ,d .,II _;. • 4 • • 'DIAt:llllKl-l!L'.TIAeOl-Tll.a · . ·" ., .. t . . . 4' . : ~ .31:('·~~.~:n ... <I ... 4-a ~ ., • • • • ~ • • . ,. • A . A,. . ., . .. :' rw --2 -;r l,331~-== \ot ,:- R\)J ~ <v0-x to)( i~ '4: 66.1 yi v , "-7 P-s-= l5:x. 9/'-1.x '-I y_fl:3_ ~ t 11..-- -l/ '5,3~ I/ *'' A";)-;;-GJ x 1 & ,: J( 4-Lr5,Jr-JC;,.. { ~ _ ----. ---.$'~ , .~¼ . ~ r. ,,.v1_ Ll ~ ci..a~ · J ~ ~ -:/1-o J T-=-lo L[({g L 11- 1 /p,jc.-r-::: iqcr(;:::, .6//' .\)St 2--sitJ'q; x '5 'i' 'kME11:? \(1~ ~-\J)i i OZA f\-.)f. t 1 P \j P,J L r .... NO S (-Jf z J l \\\I pt? v~ t CJ/~ ' r ·~1 ,1 ' .. 72- L-----t-~~ j 64A sfVO J \(1-'010 ~ . I t 11 ii 11 II i' 1w #lo ., ( -' '~ 111• , • r' ,. I l . I