The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1526 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB891790; PermitBUILDINGPERMIT 05/03/90 11 : 24 -.:-,: Page 1 of 1. . , . : Job Address: 1526 CHESTNUT.AV •. : • Permit Type: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Parcel No: 205-130-68-00 ,- Valuation: 129,13-2 . Construction Type: NEW .. ' ... Occupancy Group: R3/M1 . Class Code: Description: 1725 SF 684 SF GAR 34 SF PATIO CONTRACTOR : MARCH GROUP 2979 STATE STREET SUITE B. CARLSBAD CA 92008 OWNER : MARCH GROUP P O BOX 1803 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 *** Fees Required *** *** Str: Permit .No: CB891790 ". Project No,: A8903180 Development No : Fl: Ste:. "• . • '.-..- : 5204-05/03/90 0001 01 . C-PRHT 02 7729.00 Status: ISSUED Applied : ;ll/i6/89 Apr/Issue : 0.5/03/90 Validated By: JPY Lie. C 504642 Lie.619-729-1121 Fees Collected & Credits *** Fees: 8,218.00 . . Adjustments: .00 Total Credits: . 00 - .Total Fees: 8,218.00 . Total Payments: 489.00. Balance Due: 7,729.00 : Fee description Units Fee/Unit Ext fee Data Building Permit Plan Check , . . . Strong Motion -Fee Enter F.M.F Enter Enter Enter . ' Y ' to; Autocalc License Tax > ./G.M. F. and Zone (99) > 'Y' to Autocalc T.I.F. > ..- , 745.00 • 484.00 . 9.00 .. 4520.00 Y. 01 . 600. 00 Y Number of EDU's > 1.00 .00 - .00 'Y' to. Autocalc M.F.F. ..> * BUILDING TOTAL . . Enter Each Each Each "Y" for Plumbing Issue Fee > .. 1713. 00 Y 8071.00 ' ; 7. 50 Y - Plumbing Fixture or Trap > 14.00 . 2.50 35.00 Building Sewer > 1.00 6.50 6.50 Water Heater and/or Vent > 1.00 2.50 2.50 Gas Piping System.' - > 1.00 2.50 2.50 Each Vacuum Breaker .' . > 3.00 2.50 7.50 * PLUMBING TOTAL ; - . . Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > ..'•';.' . . 62.00 • 5.00 Y .Single Phase Per . AMP . > 100.00 .25 25.00 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL ($10 Minimum)^ • .. Ent.er 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> . 30.00 15.00 Y Install Furn/Ducts , . > 1.00 9.00 9.00 Each Each Install/Reloc Appliance Vent > 4.00 4.50 . 18.00 Hood/Fireplace . • ' > 2. .00 6.50 13.00 * MECHANICAL TOTAL . • - - ' . • - CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 I 55.00 /^AtAPPROVAL CLEARANHF /-3/-?/ M~ ^^a£<J- 9 :- io 619J 4^1^1101 PERMIT "APPLICATION ^*^ City of Carlsbad Building Department ^&^^W^ <!U/b Las Palmas Ur., Carlsbad, LA 9^009 (BIS) 438-nei ^^^^^\\ 1. PERMIT TYPE ^ftti^^r A - Q COMMERCIAL • Q]NEW QTENANT IMPROVEMENT ^l^ffg^^- B - fj INDUSTRIAL DNEW QTENANT IMPROVEMENT c - [^RESIDENTIAL QAPARTMENT n^oKDo QSIHGLE FAMILY DWELLING GADOI^ON/ALTERATION DDUPLEX DEMOLITION DISLOCATION QMOBILE HOME QELECTRICAL QPLUMBING HMECHANICAL np001- HSPA HRETAINING WALL HSOLAR n°THER ^n ^~. -CiC^ / i^7 ( J2. PROJECT INFORMATION PLAN CHECK No. 0*7'" ( / /^ ' /•z&fr'TJ~JL3^&*W >* J3 _ PLAN CK DEPOSIT. .24*j**T ^TK) \Ql\ i r TVALID. BY JI VV ^'i\f'*t>\ J 1409 .11/16/89 0001 01 02 C-PRHT 489.00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address -, 526 Chestnut Avenue Bu1lding or Suite No" N/A Nearest Cross Streets Highlanc3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LoLNo. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. • Phase No. 2 244 Thumb Lands : Map 1681 CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITTED: |5|2 Energy Calcs SU Structural Calcs 02 Soils Report 01 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL <^Q5-1 30-68 EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE gp£) DESCRIHIION OF WORK , , 1725.0 SF SFD with 684.4 SF Garage & 33.7 SF Porches BLOG. so. FTG. 2409.4 Gross # OF STORIES 2 3. CONTACT PERSON NAME William M. Booth C1TY Carlsbad SIGNATURE STATE ADDRESS p.o. Box 4651 ZIP CODE 92008 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 434-8474 4. APPLICANT D CONTRACTOR NAME Booth & Suarez CITY Carlsbad SAGENT FOR CONTRACTOR ADDRESS. DOWNER > B STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 AGENT FOR OWNER DAY TELEPHONE (619) 434-8474 5. PROPERTY OWNER NAME March Group Carlsbad Xow DLESSEE OTENANT CITY ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1803 STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 729-1 1 21 6. CONTRACTOR NAME March Group CITY Carlsbad ADDRESS STATE CA Z'P CODE 92008 STATE LIC. #504642 LICENSE CLASS P.O. Box 1803 DAY TELEPHONE ( 61 9 ) 729-1 1 21 CITY BUSINESS LIC. # SIGNATURE DESIGNER NAME BOOth & SUaTCZ CITY Carlsbad 7. WORKERS' COMPENSATION TITLE ADDRESS p Q gc STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 DATE )x 4651 DAY TELEPHONE ( 61 9 ) 434~8474 STATE L,C.*CD1 1978 Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO.EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale:). . • D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively" contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The "Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). • • I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior .to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is-exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). • • • . • SIGNATURE DATE ' COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON.-RES1DENT1AL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: . Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? • . . • DYES ' DNO- ••'.'• Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit- from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES QNO ' Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? ' • . DYES DNO . • ' IF AMY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES. A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ,.. • • 9. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY '' : • I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work, for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ; \ ' ' I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances.and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit or work authorized by such abandoned ,at any ti •d by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code.shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the.building .it is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended ork is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). Agent ^For •. P3 OWNER fXCONTRACTOR P] BY PHONE APPROVED BY: 11/6/89 WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK#: CB891790 PERMIT#: CB891790 PROJECT NAME: 1725 SF 684 SF GAR 34 SF PATIO ADDRESS: 1526 CHESTNUT AV WATER DATE: 01/23/91 PERMIT TYPE: SFD CONTACT PERSON/ PHONE #: MH/BRUCE SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST:CA INSPECTED /V?Yv, DATE BY: A X V^_ INSPECTED; JAN. 29 1991 APPROVED V' DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Diflinearlng Department (618)438-3367 FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK*: CB891790 DATE: 01/23/91 PERMIT*: CB891790 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 1725 SF 684 SF GAR 34 SF PATIO ADDRESS: 1526 CHESTNUT AV CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: MH/BRUCE SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED * * DATE / . BY: AI nJ^ INSPECTED://2^H£_ APPROVED JC^ DISAPPROVED-\ \£,-vi-yp 1 INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB891790 FOR 01/30/91 DESCRIPTION: 1725 SF 684 SF GAR 34 SF PATIO TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 1526 CHESTNUT AV APPLICANT: BOOTH & SUAREZ CONTRACTOR: MARCH GROUP OWNER:MARCH GROUP STR: 434-8474 INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK# CB891790 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW FL: STE: REMARKS: MH/BRUCE SPECIAL INSTRUCT: AM PLEASE PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 619-729-1121- INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —^RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# TYPE CB881226 SFD SE900023 SWRSD STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED CD 19 29 39 49 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Final Structural PL Final Plumbing EL Final Electrical ME Final Mechanical ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 012891 Final Combo 012391 Final Combo 100590 Interior Lath/Drywall 100590 Exterior Lath/Drywall 092790 Insulation 092190 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 091390 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 091390 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 090790 Sewer/Water Service 090790 Rough/Topout 090490 Shear Panels/HD's 090490 Roof/Reroof 072690 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 072390 Underground/Under Floor ACT CO CO AP AP AP AP CO CO AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD PD MP MP PD MP COMMENTS NO ONE THERE OK TO WRAP CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB901315 FOR 01/25/91 DESCRIPTION: 2789 SF 2S + 744 SF GARAGE + 377 SF BALCONY TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 2057 CHESTNUT AV APPLICANT: PACKARD, GARTH PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PACKARD, GARTH PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK* CB901315 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STR: FL: STE: 619 721-4371 REMARKS: MH SPECIAL INSTRUCT: AM PLEASE INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE STATUS CD, 13 SE900123 SWRSD ISSUED LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ST Shear Panels/HD's ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 120390 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PD 120390 Underground/Under Floor AP PD 112690 Grout AP PD 112090 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 102690 Grout AP TP COMMENTS SUBFLOOR SUBFLOOR 2ND LIFT WALL @ C BLDG COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Post Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 (619) 741-5289 FIELD DENSITY TESTS Job ./£&» ^/Lt^T^ / tf\Ai ASTM D2922 "~"""~" Job No.7-?V- Of , / achme No. .,..Information To:i Hours Mites TEST NUMBER RETEST No 5 HORIZONTAL .. LOCATION S VERTICAL _ LOCATION '"?7 , /v. r < MOISTURE CPM " y/ n .c, (€7, DENSITY CPM K AIR GAP CPM 7C RATIO •t-? ^f / WET DENSITY PCF JAj WATER PCF 41*-DRY DENSITY PCF A &*<d % MOISTURE 9 SOU iD No 10 kl_t^L^T /; 4 5V.*> 2,"r MA! DENSITY A4" a £. T ! v-i 75 R REQUIRED ||tJ % COMPACTION vL '^LAyt> ^2 Af, 2 ft /A APPROVED BY /i .4, ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-14^8 JURISDICTION: C PLAN CHECK NO: i ^-S ' r,e-> ~ 3^ - n^o SET:/ X) PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAl-jS; nAPPLICANT QFILS COPY QUPS nDESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. I The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. ' The plans are being held at Escil .Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. f The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. ., Ssgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been comoleted. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: T= Telephone £__ ESGIL CORPORATION DGA U.AA Dvw DDM ' Enclosures A Date: U- £^-&fl Jurisdiction C#,-Vsb<*^ Prepared by t •=^ s^. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE n 31dg. Dept. BUILDING ADDRESS f^l? C^^-^sC t^ iTC' kV>=- APPLICANT/CONTACT v/i\\i£*« fe^TT' PHONE NO. Gt+o <a~l oa BUILDING OCCUPANCY &A/H* TYPE 0? CONSTRUCTION -JZTVA/ BUILDING PORTION ,j-1\/)^^ ArcA— ^ C?\A^iJ«— '"PA'fiT' Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers BUILDING ARE.^ me DESIGNER PHONE — CONTRACTOR PHONE VALUATION MULTIPLIER 6>^ U?4 1/7 34."V -2—•6 "^ . VALUE i n-soo" H.L»'SLS ~~ £°L4 " i 1 '@ <a @ I i i Total Value A-*,!^" Building Permit Fee. $ $ ~lt-^Ll_-^~(> Plan Check Fee S $ ^S^'^5 C 0 H H E N TS: - /^KVVIX*^ O " Atr f* 1 C ' * 9% - »A^^j» O SHEET CO OF /f) " 12y BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLISTvc HATE: /X-4g-fry uu ITEM COMPLETE PLANCHECK NO. &1/-790 (P' ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION X ITEM SELECTED 1 s T C H E C K 2 N D C H E C K 3 R D C H E C K /5x<£ iJtesrA/oT' Mv&(/u£ PROJECT ID: Wft&M {-r&wP 5fO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan LJ l_l I_J 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width and dimensioned setbacks. 0 C on site plan: Finish floor e1evations,cjiQ CJ1'evations_ or _rTnTsh grade adjacent to bulldiMP existing D C . topographical lines, existing and proposed jiih percent (%) jjragg^and drainage patterns. I—I I—I 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary 'Approval Compl i No Discretionary approvals were 5. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. CT8V-2S 6. Project does nnt rnmp]y wi±h—ttre~following Engineering Approval for Project No.. Conditions complied with by: Date:. Field Review 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. 8. Field Review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: A. Site lacks adequate public improvements. B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines. D. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. FRM0010.DH 08/29/89 Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. Other: Dedication Requirements X 9. No dedication required. .10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8V' x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as fol1ows:_ Dedication completed, Date:.By:. Improvement Requirements .11. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. .12. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit, for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date:.By:. FRM0010.DH 08/29/89 .13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date Bv: Grading Requirements 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). .14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared bya registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: 4/7/6'? Bv: U£>/gi&5o L/toflseu. Mjscellaneous Permits 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the fol1owi ng: K 20. Sewer Permit is not required. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. FRM0010.DH 08/29/89 21.Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Applicantion Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Date:__ By: Fees Required 22. Park-in-Lieu Fee ^l v^L Cr Quadrant: Fee per Unit: 0( 23. Traffic Impact Fee Total Fee: Fee Per Unit:sTotal Fee: 6OO Sewer Fees Fee: Permit No. y 28. Dx REMARKS :_6£> Sewer Lateral required: Fee: " . QA) ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT Date:/ FRM0010.DH 08/29/89 u o (•>41 4) Qj £ -C .Cu u u C C Co la <o o. a CL D PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No APN: Zg>r"-/ Planner C/A/J . ff? ~/7fc? Address / S"Z6 Av&. Phone 438-1161 (Name) Type of Project and Use 5" Zone Facilities Management Zone Legend El Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: YES .DATE OF COMPLETION: _ NO X TYPE Compliance with .conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval . Discretionary Action Required: YES APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. •_ OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If notv^state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Coastal:YES NO j£ DATE OF APPROVAL: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 06 D D EllD BO D B0D mdn Landscape Plan Required: YES -NO See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. 3. Provide legal description of property. 4. Provide assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Lot coverage: 3. Height: 4. Parking: 1 • Guest Required ~L& Reauired g-i' Required Required / b- 6f Required £%o% Required 55" ' Spaces Required Spaces Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 35" /Q / 7Y' ^0% 2V Shown "Z_ Shown DD D Additional cooments and remarks have been made on the building plans. These marked -up plans nay be picked up at the Building Department. These marked- up plans must be fesuboritted with the revised plans for this project. Have plans been marked up? YES Additional Comments _ NO X OK TO ISSUE A—DATE 1 l PLNCK.FRM '/<*•£ ~ ' » 9I '7/S- A //r/- 6/ t. t f V- 4*/O 3 '. 73 " fe Slrrr-t. bad, CA V - V- /9.G' Vt k€>tC ' -*-*ffui ^ *" ~i Ct v -*<-•-i Ji f n r Jet,._. f. _ „ r/9 ?rtf<?^ - xi-l.r^ o ///-<-/ /. j JL/ .- ~,»-s " e-O. //S 9 OOP 88^0* u- i * »• ' 73 . J/r»«/2Tx;.. 3) 07.» n 6,B. Zc.- £ 4" / , £,/•/*• £ -J V 17J. I I D E .'<t* 7- *, !•>« w A HP 7A r e r * s- £' * f\ T Ul X = I*' 42-4 /9£f? STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS OEOROE P. LOUNS6URY R.C.E. 1330 NO. ELM STREET ESCONDIDO, CA 92026 TEL. (619) 743-6282 DATE : ^. PAGE NO. : PROJ. NO.: OF __ £Li?.lfLlL_ PA M c VIST/}, <LA OZ '"- I''' Of.i ^ 3) I1 a." ! * - *<: ,*v . STUP ETC- 7-y flDC) @ --,—i._i__" ~L' \'' 3 Ca? > o O TJ OIo Xo o O o O3 CD m 3) CT) cn s 2o 33 2 O n m 2g o -^ x-* l-o P O<U — 5|"?« OS - 010 COm O O ~n> p Omts> O T) O On.o- CDm33 co O O O Co O mz O O D Oc s^ -~* l-eN* K> Irax x C o o ^s] ho N> N> b b I I -s I I * K Si** m z O z> ooC C " ^- P- "0 TJ ' (ft V) ( » * S I I K> K> »-• X X Ill H?*s »11a n I •° oSfsi Wl SJ ^ *-5SnS 2 ?§ ??*?.? vi ^irn^H?1?!'""5 Sft 6J I i, 3 I ^ CL |i' & * : 5 5.? |5 ll! I<? S ^* 5 c £ 'S ff 2 ! ! 5 I IM f » 3 § 2o -5| a 2s * 582* .«a»aq 52 la "a X x1- n >nr 8- £. \w 9 J ft 5•n 5 e s CO 5 1 in K S X X 2 I 1 SP *J I i! 1|5 : ii § I 2| I COMPACTION LAB INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES October 25, 1988 Project No. CL-1624 'Thjrrien Development Co. 2979 State Street, Suite c Carlsbad, CA 92116 Subject: Grading and Foundation Plan Review Lot No.'s 2 and 3 of Carlsbad Tract 84-28 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA Gentlemen: Per your request, we have reviewed the following grading and foundation plans prepared for the subject lots: 1. Grading Plan prepared by Resource and Development Corporation, dated April 6, 1988. 2. Foundation Plan Lot #2, prepared by William Booth (AIA), dated September 9, 1988. 3. Foundation Plan Lot #3, Prepared by William Booth (AIA), dated September 9, 1988. Briefly; our review has revealed the above listed grading and foundation plans were prepared in accordance with the recommendations set forth in our Preliminary Soils Report, dated December 29, 1987. Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. Alan H. Sargent^ Dale R. Regli President Registered Civil Engineer 19393 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 RKA/jak . cc: (3) submitted • Post Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 • (619) 741-5289 kce for Dwellings Car Chestnue Avenue lsbad, California Prepared for .THERRIEN DEVELOPMENT CO. 2929 State Street Suite C Carlsbad, Ca. 92116 December 29, 1986 project Ho, CL-1624 Post Office Box 271338, # A* TA 92027 • (619)741-5289Escond,do, CA 92027 COMPACTION LAP", INC. SOiL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES December 29, 1986 Project No. CL-1624 Therrien Development Co." 2979 State Street, Suite C Carlsbad, CA. 92008. - Subject: 4 Proposed Single Family Dwellings Carlsbad Tract 84-28 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Per your request, we have performed a preliminary soils investi- gation for the subject project. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the suitability of the site for the proposed development and make recommendations with regard to site grading and foundation design. Briefly, the investigation reveals favorable soil conditions and in our opinion the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided recommendations set forth in the .attached report are adheared to. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. . Alan H. Sargent Dale R. Regli President RCE 19393 •V RKA/pjr cc: (3) submitted Pest Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 • (619) 741-5289 COMPACTION LAf ^>, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Purpose and Scope 1 2. Location and Description of Site 1 3. Field Investigation 1 4. Soil Conditions . 2 5. Laboratory Testing 2 6. Recommendations and Conclusions 3 A. Grading • B. Foundations C. Recommended Paving Section D. Review of Grading Plan 7. Uncertainty & Limitations 5 APPENDIX Appendix "A" - Exploration Legend and Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate No. 1 Test Pit Location Plan Plate No. 2-6 Exploration Log Plate No. 7 Tabulation of -Test Results Appendix "B" - Recommended Grading Specifications COMPACTION LAI % INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Page 1 1. PURPOSE & SCOPE The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the site is suitable for the proposed single family dwellings. The scope of the investigation was to: A. Determine the physical properties and engineering characteristics of the surface and subsurface soils. • B. Provide design information with regard to grading, site preparation, and foundation design of the pro- posed structures. 2. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITE The site is located at 1536 Chestnut Avenue, City of Carlasbad, California, and has been designated as Carlsbad Tract No. 84-28. The 248' x 323' rectangular shaped parcel of land is bordered by Chestnut Avenue to the southeast, and existing single family dwellings to the northwest, northeast and southwest. James Drive presently dead-ends at the west property corner and will be extended approximately 120' into the site during the course of construction. The topography of the property consists of a predominantly flat lot which slopes very gently downhill in a southwesterly direction. The total difference in elevation between the northeast and southwest property line is approximately 4 feet. It is our understanding that the housing tract has been divided into five lots, one. of which is occupied with a single family dwelling and guest house. The remaining lots, presently vacant, will be developed to accommodate four newly planned single family dwellings. Site vegetation at the present time consists of short native grasses and several small to large trees. Debris (wood, metal, etc.) were observed as being stockpiled on the southwest region of the property and will require removal from the site prior to earth-work construction. , 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on December 10, 1986, and included an inspection of the site and the excavation of five exploratory trenches, with a back hoe to depths of eleven feet. Location of test pits are shown .on attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan." •. ,.....•:.,•-,.*£.-«..••"-: . • . ^v^rViV-.^ ,^;;-;V-3££^^ COMPACTION LAf 1, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Page 2 As excavation proceeded representative bulk samples were collected. In place natural densities and moisture content were determined at different depths:in the excavations and are. included in Plate No.'s 2 .- 6. :4.> SOIL.CONDITIONS . ' ;' • , '-' '. ^'. Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of plowed ground were found to average one and one-half feet in depth throughout the site. Underlying soils to depths explored were medium dense to dense silty-sands, clayey-sands and .stiff sandy-clays.) During our investigation, slightly to moderately expansive soils (clayey-sands and sandy-clays) were encountered at depths of 9, 6, 5 and 6_.feet below existing grade in Test Pit No.'s 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively .?i However, if grading is performed as planned, we anticipate expansive soils located at these depths will not be encountered during earth-work, nor be detrimental to the proposed foundations upon completion of grading. At the time of;our investigation" groundwater .was not observed, nor did caving!of exploratory trenches occur. " > '.-..••":".•.;-' * '.-•"• VV;-••"••. ' • 5.: LABORATORY SOIL TESTING,- All laboratory tests,were performed on typical soils in accordance with accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials .(ASTM). / *', '.'•' \ ; Tests conducted include: .v:^ ' ; ; (1) Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture s (2) Direct Shear (Remold) ; - :- (3) Sieve Analysis <= (4) Field Density & Moisture (5) Expansion Potential (conducted in accordance with 'requirements of the City of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils.) (6). Resistance Value Test Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate No.'s 2 through 7 entitled "Exploration Log & Tabulation of Test Results." COMPACTION LAf \ INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Page 3 6. RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS General The site is suitable for the proposed single family dwellings. Recommendations contained in this report should be incorporated in the planning, design and construction phase of the subject project. 6A. Grading General Grading at the site will be performed for. the purpose of removing and recompacting loose surficial topsoils and to create level building pads to accommodate the proposed dwellings. Furthermore, it is our understanding, planned slopes should not exceed heights of two feet. All grading should be performed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad grading ordinance and the recommendations/specifications presented in this report. Subsequent to site demolition, loose surficial top soils (plowed ground), as indicated on attached Plate No.'s 2 through 6, should be undercut or removed to firm native ground and recompacted in accordance with attached Appendix 'B1 entitled "Recommended Grading Specifications." Firm native ground may be determined as undisturbed soil having an insitu density of greater than 85 percent of maximum dry density. We should be contacted to document firm native ground is exposed and properly prepared prior to the placement of fill soils. Following removal and recompaction of loose surficial soils, all additional fill soils generated from earthwork construction should be placed in conformance with attached Appendix 'B' entitled "Recommended Grading Specifications." If encountered, leach lines and/or pipes should be removed. Concrete pipes may be crushed in-place. Trench lines should be recompacted in accordance with Appendix 'B1. 6B. Foundations General We understand foundations for the proposed dwellings will consist of slab-on-grade construction. Furthermore, on-site expansive soils should remain a minimum of 36 inches below finish grade upon completion of grading. Therefore, we are anticipating the use of conventional foundations to safely support the proposed one and two story loads. COMPACTION LAr 3, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Page 4 Continuous footings founded in 36 inches of on-site non-expansive soil having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. In the case of two-story construction all continuous footings should be founded a minimum of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. All continuous footings are to be reinforced with one #4 bar top and bottom. Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches in thickness. 6C. Recommended Paving Section General During our investigation a soil sample was obtained from the approximate subgrade elevation of the proposed extension of James Drive. Resistance value tests were performed on the collected sample for the purpose of determining street structural section. However, we recommend upon completion of grading, street subgrade soils are re-inspected to assure samples obtained at the time of our investigation are representative. Based on R-Value test results and the specified traffic index for James Drive, the following street structural section is anticipated. Traffic Index =4.5 (Specified by City of Carlsbad) 2 inches of asphaltic paving on 6 inches of select base course on 8 inches of recompacted native subgrade. All materials and construction for asphaltic paving and base should conform to the Standard Specifications of the State of California Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Section 39 and 26, respectively. Class III decomposed granite, if used, should have a minimum 'R1 value of 70 and SE of 30. All materials should be compacted to a minimum of 95%. 6D. Review of Grading Plan Approved site and grading plans were not available at the time of our investigation. Therefore, upon their completion we would like to review them to assure compliance with the recommendations presented in this report. COMPACTION LAP!, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Page 5 Preliminary grading plans used during our investigation were prepared by Resource Development Corporation of Encinitas, California. . 7. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS Surface and subsurface soils are assumed to be uniform. Therefore, should soils encountered during construction differ from those presented in this report, we should be contacted to provide their engineering properties. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to carry out recommendations set forth in this report. During our investigation of the subject site, evidence of faulting was not encountered. Subsequent to review of available geologic literature, we feel any faulting in the vicinity of the site may be classified as inactive. However, it should be noted that San Diego County is located in a high seismic area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake proof projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damag'e as a result of earthquake is probable, and we assume no liability. 1 We assume the onsite safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manor and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. #MJ Alan H. Sargent . Dale R. Regli President RCE 19393 RKA/pjr cc : (3) submitted COMPACTION LABS SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION 1. COARSE GRAINED, More than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) 11. FINE GRAINED, More than . half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS GROUP SYMBOL GW GP CM GC SW SP SM sc ML CL OL MH / TYPICAL NA.1ES [/ Well graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines. Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. Well graded sand,gravelly sands, little or no fines. Poorly graded sands,gravelly sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Liquid Li_mit CH greater than 50 OH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plast-' icity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity/gravelly clays, sandy clays,silty clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or ailty soils, elastic . silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high' plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. (J - - Water level at time of excavation or as indicated US - Undisturbed, driven ring sample or tube sample CK - Undisturbed chunk sample BG - Bulk samole APPENDIX 'A' Post Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 • (619) 741-5289 COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN -Rr PROPOSED . F. D. . TES.T PIT \LftT\OM EY S \5TJ'AiG, HOUSE LH.EST WUT PROJECT NO. CL- lb"2 M PLATE NO. Dixie PROJECT NAME ELEVATION Existing Grade COMPACTION LABS SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LOQ CARLSBAD TRACT 84-28 DATE LOGGED TEST PIT NO. December 10, 1986 ONE 4_> O) <u Vf- •*^ _c 4-J Q. QJ Q 1 . 2 3 •4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 tu Q. >> 1— cu ex E to I/O BG BG CK CK BG D(lD U >, 4-> •r— LO d ^~* QJ U- d o Q. ^") *^^ s_ Q 108.4 120.8 118.6 s~~» >« (U S- -(J 3 C -I-J O) l/l 4-> •»- c O O s: «_) 4.0 5.4 10.9 o O CXI =*>= * ^ >« cn--^ c. • r- O> <s> > on O) (O -t- D- I/O 24.4 21.0 34.7 ccj nD O . VJ JZ. ^-) ex O) Q ^^ 4-> OJ O) r— O) 0.4- E ^— ' rO oo 0-1 ' .1.5' 3' 5' 8' Q c, a o +-> (O u •r— M- • r— 1/1 I tO •r- IT3 O i— LO O SM SM SM SM CL DESCRIPTION & REMARKS Dark Brown, moist, loose, silty- sand. ( Topsoi 1 -P 1 owed Ground) Light Bronw, humid, medium dense silty-sand. (Firm Native) Red Brown, moist, dense, silty- sand. (Slight tint of clay) Orange, moist, dense, silty-sand (Mottled w/streaks of gray) Brown, moist, stiff, sandy-clay. (Mottled w/streaks of gray) BOTTO.M OF TEST PIT #1 PROJECT NO.CL-1624 PLATE NO.TWO COMPACTION LABS SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES PROJECT NAME ELEVATION Existing Grade EXPLORATION LOG Carlsbad Tract # 84-28 DATE LOGGED ______ TEST PIT NO. December 10. 1986 Two ^-^ 4-> QJ QJ 4— _C -M Q. QJ Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 •OJ Q. 0) Q. E n3 I/O RG CK CK BG BG ^ . ^ to QJ 4- 0 0 f^ S_ 109 0 119.6 116.8 •-- . , . £ QJ i- 4-> 3 C -4-» QJ •r- C O Os: o 9 fi 6.4 8.2 O O CNJ >* c •i- QJ CO QJ (X I/O 23 ? 32.7 -C .|_> . Q. CD C3 *-~ Q; QJ r— QJ 0.4- E — oo 2 ' 4' 51 8' 9.5' O • f— ^_J O ••" 4— 00 i — CO •r~ fO O i— CO O SM SM SM SC DESCRIPTION & REMARKS Dark Brown, moist, loose silty- sand. (Topsoil - Plowed Ground) Light Brown, dry, dense, silty- Orange Brown, humid, dense, s i 1 ty-s and . -- Orange-mottled w/streaks of gray, moist, dense, clayey-sand. BOTTOM OF TEST PIT #2 PROJECT NO.CL-1624 PLATE NO.Three COMPACTION LABS SOIL TLSTINC 8, INSI'LCTION SERVICES PROJECT NAME . ELEVATION Exist/ing Grade EXPLORATION LOG Carlsbad Tract #84-28 DATE LOGGED December 10. 1986 TEST PIT NO. _Three '^ 4-* OJ Ol 14- *— *" -C Q. OJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 •*CJ O. QJ ' E CO I/O BG ^^ •"-• to C *•" QJ H- O ^ > Q. S- Q --' ^.^ ^O) S- 4-J 3 C -4-> QJ tO -|J ••— c O O • 2! 0 0 O CVJ =«= '-^ ^*en- — c •i— O) I/) > to QJ Q. OO 30.9 _c 4-J Q. QJ Q •"•» +J QJ QJ r— QJ cm- ^ 6' c 0 ••— 4J 03 U ••~ M- •<— to i — tO O r— OO O SM SM sc DESCRIPTION & REMARKS . Dark Brown, moist, loose silty- sand. (Topsoil - Plowed Ground) Light Brown, humid, medium dense, silty-sand. (Firm Native) • Brown-mottled w/streaks of gray, moist, medium dense clayey-sand. BOTTOM OF TEST PIT #3 PROJECT NO. Cl-1624 PLATE NO.Four COMPACTION LABS SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME ELEVATION Carlsbad Tract #84-28 Existing Grade DATE LOGGED TEST PIT NO. December 10. 1986 Four ^r QJ QJ **- ^— ^ ^CX O) • Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 QJ Q_ 1 — QJ Q. £ oo CK . -M CO_ ^^ QJ M- 0 <-> 0 0 123.6 S QJ I— 4-5 33 c w'^ •r— C 0 0 2: C_3 7.2 oo CM >*CD- — c •i- QJ to > to QJ f^ *r— Q. (/) • 32.5 •4-J Q. QJ Q -^ 4-> QJ QJ r— QJ CXM- c ^^ 03 OO 3' — c o 'J3. no (J •<- M- ••- i tO •i— 03 O r— to c_> SM SM SG DESCRIPTION & REMARKS Dark Brown, moist, loose, silty- sand. (Topsoil - Plowed Ground) Light Brown, humid, dense, silty- sand. (Firm Native) Brown-mottled w/gray streaks, moist dense, clayey-sand. > . > BOTTOM OF TEST PIT #4 PROJECT NO.CL-1624 PLATE NO.Five COMPACTION LABS SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME Carlsbad Tract #84-28 ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE LOGGED TEST PIT NO. December 10, 1986 Five O) 01 .c Q. a; Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a. 1— OJ Q. CO BG CO cr ^~* a> c}_ Q U Q. CD 3 C J-> O) CO -I-J •r- C O O S <_) - o 0 CNJ CTl^-> •r- O) CO > CO CU (O -r- Q- LO 24.2 / QL ai Q <— - ai ai r— OJ cm- 03 CO 3-4' • c o CO i — CO •i- ro O -—CO C_5 SM SM SM DESCRIPTION & REMARKS r Dark Brown, moist, loose, silty- sand. (Topsoil - Plowed Ground) Light Brown, humid, dense, silty- sand. (Firm Native) (R Value Sample Obtained from 3 - 4" - approx. subgrade elev.) Brown gray, humid, dense, silty- s and . BOTTOM OF TEST PIT #5 PROJECT NO.CL-1624 PLATE NO.Six COMPACTION LAE , INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Tabulation of Test Results OPTIMUM MOISTURE, MAXIMUM DENSITY Soil Description Type Maximum Optimum Dry Density Moisture (Ib/cu.ft) (% dry wt.) Dark Brown Silty-Sand Pl@0-l' Light Brown Silty-Sand Pl@1.5' Brown w/streaks of gray Clayey Sand P3@6' EXPANSION Sample No. Condtion Initial Moisture (%) Air Dry Moisture (%) Final Moisture {%) Final Dry Density (pcf ) Load (psf) Swell (%) 126.6 126.8 122.5 POTENTIAL / piei.s1 Rem. 90% 9.8 1.6 13.8 114.0 150.0 0.00 9.5 9.8 • 10.2 P3@6' Rem. 90% 10.1 3.2 17.5 110.2 150.0 2.8 DIRECT SHEAR Sample No. Condition Angle of Internal Friction ( Cohesion Intercept (pcf) Pl@1.5' Rem. 90% 37 50 RESISTANCE VALUE and SAND EQUIVALENT TEST Sample No. R-Value Test Result S.E. Test Result P5Q3-4' 44 18.0 Project No. CL-1624 Plate No. 7 COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS (General Prov i s i ons) 1. INTENT The intent of these specifications is to provide general procedures in accordance with current standard practices regarding clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to receive fill, and placing and compacting of fill soil to the lines, grades and slopes delineated on the available plans. Recommendations set forth in the attached preliminary soils investigation report and/or special provisions are a part of the "Recommended Grading Specifications" and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. 2. INSPECTION & TESTING A qualified soil engineer shall be employed to inspect and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications and the accepted p1 ans. It will be necessary that the soils engineer or his representative be allowed to provide adequate inspection so that he may certify that the work was or was not accomplished as specified or indicated. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes, new information and dates, and new unforeseen soils conditions so that he may make these certifications. Soil tests used to determine the degree of compaction will be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: * Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D-1557-70T * Density of Soil In-Place - ASTM D-1556 or ASTM D-2922 and 3017 APPENDIX 'B1 Post Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 • (619) 741-5289 COMPACTION LALJ, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES 3. MATERIALS Those soils used as fill will have a minimum of 40 percent passing a #4 sieve. They will be free of vegetable matter or other deleterious substances and contain no rock over six inches in size. Should unsuitable material be encountered, the soil engineer will be contacted to provide recommendations. .4. PLACING AND SPREADING OF FILL The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which when compacted will not exceed 6 inches in thickness. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade mixed during the spreading to-insure uniformity of material in each 1ayer. . When the moisture content of the fill material is below that recommended by the soil engineer, water shall then be added until the moisture content is as specified to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill material is above that recommended by the soil engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. 5. COMPACTION After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted .to not less than .90% relative compaction. Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic tired rollers or other types of rollers. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtai ned. -. The fill operati-on shall be continued in six inch compacted layers, or as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades shown on the available plans. APPENDIX 'B1 COMPACTION LA S, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES .6. WALL BACKFILL Backfill soil should consist of non-expansive sand. Compaction should be achieved with light hand-held penumatic tampers to avoid over compaction and hence cause structural damage. Wall backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density. . 7. TRENCH BACKFILL All trench backfill located.within structural areas should be compacted to a minimum of ninety percent of maximum density. APPENDIX 'B1 HERZBERGER / SALEHI ENGINEERING CALIFORNIA THEATRE BLDG. 1122 4TH. AVE. SUITE 709 '• SAN DIEGO CA 92101 TELEPHONE: SAN DIEGO (619) 239-4636 ENERGY ANALYSIS FOR MARCH GROUP NOVEMBER 08 1989 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. _ DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by- the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) Encinitas Union Elementary 189 Union Street Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306), Project Applicant:. Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area CAt SQ. FT. of covered area COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FL AREA Prepared By San Marcos Unified 270 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 92069 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard . Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) APN: Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of garage area Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other vied: $ ^.^" vied: $ T 3-^~-^ based on |}1^ based on 5 sq. f t.@ v$> | v ST6 sq. ft. @ S'ehoqtL District Official > Title Date AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.56 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at $.26 per square foot for commercial/industrial.