Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1620 FARADAY AVE; ; CB983162; Permit09/14/1999 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: Applicant: City of Carlsbad Building Permit Permit No:CB983162 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 1620 FARADAY AV CBAD INDUST Sub Type: 2121302300 Lot#: $785,461.00 Construction Type: Reference #: 28,254 SF SHELL TIL TUP 98 VN Status: Applied: Entered By: Appr/lssued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 09/17/1998 rma 09/14/1999 SMITH CONSUL TING ARCHITECTS Total Fees: I '-...._J I "-'•,,, -~ --,/ /; \ (j/ ' Description ( ~( __ /) / ~--... ·-.JS:-·,···.,.,, /J?\ Cc.J~ Fee -------------------!--->....,./ _J _____ ;:lrtA_~\,..{7. ____ ~,-.:--_1 !--~--/__ }__ ____________ _ * ELECTRICAL TOTAL \ \ ~/ l\ ~Wri (,/,,~~¥I;' 2,010.00 * PLUMBING TOTAL \ \ ", \/·~ ',.._H d'J ·-f?:}// / 77. 00 BLDG PLAN CHECK \ \?' }"-0::,, i? __. ;;;;,---j I 1,867.68 BUILDING PMTS \ L/ \ V C::-, / 1 2,873.36 CONTRB SP ASSESS \\;:~ 1 INCORPORATED / \--, I 11,302.00 PUBLIC FACILITIE , J ,,.,-1 '-,, 1f,;52 /_,.,, r'\ ,;;, /'") /' 14,295.39 STRNG MOTION /<7 f j' '-...._ _ _)( ___ ,/ , • ...._ (\\ \ \; 164. 95 TRAFFIC IMPACT ~/ / ( (7? ~\Oz\\~\ ., / 4,512.00 ~ ~0\J'> -'//// ---.. .------____ FINAL APPROVAL Date: 7#& ; ' Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which ou have reviousl been iven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has reviousl otherwise ex ired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 02 --oio )J:( iERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE Ooj&J bi- PLAN CHECK NO. __ l EST. VAL. 7 !f 5 1 l..ff.., r l9 ,--, CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 Plan Ck. Deposit ~1 . b f Validated Bv. tf!Af- Date Cl f · ,, / · I Total # of units 0001 01-02 # of Bedrooms C-PR!'fpf Bathroolj}_367 u 00 State/Zip Telephone# Fax# "7,z.$ ~) ~ 7 ?;,- Name Address City State/Zip State License # 6 2$-'o b '.7 ' License Class <'£5 I -LJ. City Business License # a'. n . ') • }p C) ~TN CMS, .,,,eiJCU s:-l S::CCI/& StJ(l,£8J,,-""IZ)~~r, _J . ../), CO, 1/).f,;7../ 617~ Yij P'-J/ Q_ 0 Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ tlk,.~;W.Q.BJ~IIBS;:QpJYl~NSt\J:IQl'L-.,,.::::~-~::-:_:: :.~::,:::·.~---. -----.',~:: ... : .. ·:.: .. :.: .... '..' -~-~ .;·: ---· .. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of t_rork for which this permit is issued. ,10' I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy num,ber are: / / Insurance Company ;tc.,l/L-/.,S CcJ~RiJ,,,J ,e;;:::-._s,(A/ .z::;,/t964?,licy No. C:.,t,JA,/9ft[t5.J6f' 90? Expiration Date 4 / /ft OOU (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100] OR LESS) / O CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation c e is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($10 f com nsation, da ages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, in)l!rest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE,.!:::::::::2~~=::::==~~....&e:J~~~::::::~C----:--:---:----:---:---DATE '7-/ f./~ 'f 7 l;:_, .. 'owNER~BUttbei:fDECiARAl'ION', / :~;' ·,, , ~ ... ,, _,.,,, , ,,_,,_,, _, ... , •'•• I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is ·sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ address / phone number/ type of work): ________________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _____________________ _ DATE _________ _ '.£QMPJ¥t~:ft!i!'i ]:i~QI!Qlf fQ!lt(Q~jg$Je~T!At.~Yi~P1~G£'.iiB"v1Jr~:dN1,.,'{,. · :~.: .. ~ _ :~ .. Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25634 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site 7 D YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. li;";;;._:!'.m_N$tll!JPJ;IQY{:1;,t;tJQir{~A<¥t;~.<iY:·,.>" :::..::....:,..~,.,·· .·,,..: .· ·:,. ;-~,,~:-· -. ·. ·. ·, ,, .... ,. ·, .. ••· ...... ·· .. · ··- 1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ l~1;<,Al!l:lt..lCAN;t1;cesr:1F.ICATto~·7,;·..,.,..,, .. '.7"" ............ --". ~.::. ..... ...-... ,,.-::-.1 •• ,.;,,,., • __ ,,,.,:,: • • ~--·,.. • ·, I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans 'is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 6'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by s~ch permit is not co_mmenced within 365 ~ays from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work Is commenced for a period of 1 ys (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE'=:::::~~~~~~~;2,~~~~~~=~--_:___ DATE -~9-~/--"-~-~--=<J.__,,L-__ _ , ... YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance • C L s a &:.c: -, . " wl l Lf3D 09/14/1999 City of Carlsbad Sewer Permit Permit No: SE980218 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Reference#: Project Title: Description: Permitee: 1620 FARADAY AV CBAD swow 2121302300 28,254 SF SHELL TIL TUP SMITH CONSUL TING ARCHITECTS Lot#: 98 -----------~ Status: Applied: Issued: Expired: Entered By: ISSUED 10/22/1998 09/14/1999 JJ 5355 MIRA SORRENTO PL STE 6 /_,,/ 1(,-:, 1 -\ ~ SAN DIEGO CA 92130 / /'? 1 / .1 /~ ~ 619192-1212 / r0 \ ~ \'.::::)u\J/ 0 /) 1. 0 )\) -J\j I ( r-0 ~934 09/14/99 0001 01. ""-.1/ ,___ __ ~~ \ \'-\ ,~ or:,i.n· Total Fees: \ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 5,627.00 10,306.00 02 ::..::s::s. 00 UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE Ptr . , INSPECTOR d PERMIT# '8-31 ~z..--.· PLAN CHECK# ___ _ JOB ADDRESS / ~ '2-V ~dAd'7 ,4-A/. DESCRIPTION __________________ _ CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS -~ Inspection List Permit#: CB983162 Type: INDUST 28,254 SF SHELL TIL TUP Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 6/5/2000 89 Final Combo TP NR 4/25/2000 34 Rough Electric TP AP SUB PNLS, TRANS 4/24/2000 34 Rough Electric TP NR 3/27/2000 34 Rough Electric· TP AP UFFER GRN FIX 3/23/2000 34 Rough Electric TP PA MAIN PULL SECT, SWITCH (NEED TRQ LTR) 3/22/2000 34 Rough Electric TP NR 3/15/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP LOT LITE POLE BASES 3/15/2000 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP 3/14/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP co LITE POLE BASES 3/14/2000 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin TP co 3/8/2000 24 Rough/Topout TP AP ROOF DRAINS (AIR TEST} 3/6/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP ENT. CANOPY 3/2/2000 34 Rough Electric DM AP 3/1/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP STR ENCL CEIL, EXT SOFFIT REAR EXT. 3/1/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP AP EXT @ TOWER CLMNS 3/1/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP NR 2/11/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP 1 HR STR ENCL & TEL ELECT ROOM 2/8/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP Pl CONFREG1HRSTRENCL 2/4/2000 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP SOG REPLACE @ PLUMB 2/4/2000 66 Grout TP WC 2/1/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 2/1/2000 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP MEZ MTLDECK 1/28/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor TP NR NO PERMIT 1/27/2000 15 Roof/Re roof TP AP 1/26/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 1/26/2000 15 Roof/Reroof TP co 1/25/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP POUR STRIP 1/25/2000 15 Roof/Reroof TP NR RAIN 1/24/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP POUR STRIP 1/24/2000 15 Roof/Reroof TP NR 1/20/2000 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP co P. STRIP 1/17/2000 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin TP PA U/G CONDUIT FOR SITE LITES 12/15/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 12/15/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP PNLS COMP. 12/14/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 12/14/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP co PNLS 12/13/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB CA 11/22/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 11/22/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP PNLS 2-8, 12,15, 19-26 11/19/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 11/19/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP PA PNLS 11/18/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 11/18/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP co Thursday, June 29, 2000 Page 1 of2 11/17/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 11/17/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP co PLNS 11/3/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP WC 11/3/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP S.O.G. N/INCL RESTRM AREA 11/1/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP PIP WALLS FOR ELEV. 11/1/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP AP 10/29/1999 63 Walls TP AP PIP @ ELEV PIT 10/28/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP Pl APVL PNDING P.C.R. ELE;f PIT, SPRD FTN 10/28/1999 12 Steel/Bond Beam TP Pl 1 0/ 12/ 1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB CA DONE 10/12/1999 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin RB PA INSP 3/0 UFER ONLY-OK 10/8/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP PA PERM & INT SPRDS 9/30/1999 21 Underground/Under Floor TP AP 1ST FLR WASTE 9/29/1999 21 Underground/Under Floor TP AP BLDG MAIN, LAT. FOR FUTURE Thursday, June 29, 2000 Page 2 of2 CilY of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check#: Date: 6/9/2000 Permit#: CB983162 Permit Type: INDUST Project Name: 28,254 SF SHELL TIL TUP Sub Type: Address: 1620 FARADAY AV Lot: 98 Contact Person: Phone: Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA ·························································································································································· lnsp~ectea ~le By:-~----~-~--r-1-A pected: lnsP, ct Date ~-j~pproved: ~ Disapproved: __ By: __________ Inspected: ______ Approved: ___ Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: __________ Inspected: _____ Approved: ___ Disapproved: __ ··························································································································································· Comments: ______________________________ _ City of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite ,Erre:i Plan Check #: Date: 6/5/2000 Permit#: CB983162 Permit Type: INDUST Project Name: 28,254 SF SHELL TILTUP Sub Type: Address: 1620 FARADAY AV Lot: 98 Contact-Person: BILL Phone: 7604382633 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected Date &.LL3/&D By: C. fJ &,R,d.__ Inspected: Approved: K Disapproved: __ l I Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... Comments: ______________________________ _ CilY of Carlsbad · Final Building Inspection JUN I 22000 Dept: Building E,oglne_ifrjng Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check#: Date: 6/9/2000 Permit#: CB983162 Permit Type: INDUST Project Name: 28,254 SF SHELL TIL TUP Sub Type: Address: 1620 FARADAY AV Lot: 98 Contact Person: Phone: Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA ················································i···································································-······································ Inspected Date t/;:;/o~ By: .CJ?-vt .I 0~ Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: v"' ( f Inspected Date '7/4v/4~ y" Disapproved: __ By: Z//6f.J Def/is Inspected: Approved: t I Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 ... Comments: RE P(:f).f,E. P4tvLe, /,,,v ,04 IV I? Ev .4 r p ,£1'/?4.? ~.ll Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. FINAL REPORT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING DATE: May 24, 2000 TO: City of Carlsbad Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Established 1946 Job No. 99-441 99-764 (Two job #'s same job) SUBJECT: SA TlSFACTORY COMPLETION OF WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING PERMIT NO.: CB983162 PROJECT ADDRESS Blackmore Lot 98 1620 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA I declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best ofmy knowledge, the work requiring special inspection, material sampling and testing, including the off-site fabrication of building components for the structure/s constructed under the subject permits is in conformance with the approved plans, the inspection and observation program and other construction documents, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Unifonn Building Code. Executed on this 24th day of May, 2000. The work which we provided Special Inspection consisted of: Reinforced Concrete, Structural Steel-Field Welding, High Strength Bolting, Dowel/Bolt Anchorage, Roof Diaphragm Nailing. A. lfthe inspection services were provided by an approved material testing laboratory or special inspection agency: TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. ADDRESS: 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18, San Diego, CA 92111 RESPONSIBLE MANAGING ENGINEER OF THE TESTING LABORATORY OR SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY: NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) R. Douglas Provins, ,;;;: <fl;!= e State of California Registration Number: C56018 Expiration Date: 12/" B. If the inspection services were provided by an independent certified special inspector: SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S NAME (PRINT OR TYPE): REGlSTRATIONNUMBER: EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE: Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _J_ Project Name BJ ec/:.l)?o.i£ ·-i.o T CJ/[ TESD Project # _9,__9~ .. _l/,-.i/1-+/ ____ _ Address l6al.O MRl-ld1J ltwr; C&RJ5b~c/4 Cit General I Subcontractor &no< Consr, Soulh ~ u.J£!.cit1:f Building Permit #C/39[?; 2,/?, .2 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ cone: Mix #/psi --+~lans owe~ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi Specif~tions~Erl __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Sizes _'r._l/f Ft.t.2.U ~Struct Steef!F/...:3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rinf: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block _.iL._ Electrode Storage /lll,15//)./. I --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__L Steel A t;7,.;J. A 1 t:-, .II (,rY_'. __ Load (Pounds) ,, I __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~ Electrodes £10/8'; £7[7--8" -- __ DSA _. __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative # ~~ ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. -S. IJ. c1g /..1cYts1 INSPECTOR'S NAME 01£jJI/EJ!J /J/J_CJ/2£S (Print Cl~arly) CE RT. NO /C/3 c/-71 /0 ~ 7 7/..3-[?'5- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥ t IZ011E s DATE ,2-8-00 Form/1003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT . - Page_1_of _L Project Name /sl&ckmaie;=: -La L Jo 3 TESD Project# 9 9-L/f/8 Address /.S:3S 69&Frc/1j IJ(IE1 (}1-1RJ.,·~'11ta/,, CII R _/\ !L ~ General/ Subcontractor l)c/1 rJ l Coos-r Kl, ll. lbm11t:C/2lf 7 Building Permit#C/39'Ja,z:;Q C) DSA# ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other _________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~ans & l// i.U.l.J:' d __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecifications /;kvie:t~.J __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes 8£¥i.E. £t!..U -1L°struct SteeFeft/J 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein/. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block ~lectrode Storage/iiJJ.sjl}l / --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --.....:tL Steel ,9Stk __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --~Metal Deckina:;~-~~~~ -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts ---.k:'.'.:'.:_ Electrodes /;' :0 f -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ ,;;?:a~~::::tf;j = :f%;;;#Zn8::;:::/;::~:::::,;~~ -::;::;:;:;_:/;;;11.7:2~;;:::at!#~'!f:£e~5::~<:n-r1t~~ =~::~o;;~;~Jr;J::%°1:?!t;;t;~a eWJ1cd11 Field Representative # ---~ ~.,. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. SA. tJ:,J,1c:flt~ 7 1NsPEcToR's NAME0Z£p II.tr; t? [lip.&£ s ( rint Clearly} ~ , CERT. No. IC/$0 Jo;; 77/.3 ~ [?.S- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ yi:;;,'~ DATE ,,2-7--Q CJ Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _/_ Project Name IJ/.e CK/t)o,&E-1 () LJI) :3 TESD Project # _q.,_q_,_-_L/~½ ..... · 'l~/5 ____ _ Address A£ ?S: i'llRA-clty ll-w::/ CIJ&L5Mc(, (?ft General/ Subcontractor !lblJO, {h/'J.SL; C.m, ,T Building Permit #{}B·990S/lo DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~Plans &'I.LC/J.!£.J __ Prestress Cone --Base --__ cone: Mix #/psi ,z:~::1'.°f::V~)g-.1 Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Struct Stee1::tf /37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein/. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block ~ Electrode Storage /ll/JSl/)L / I --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ------Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --t/ Steel ArG __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__ H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --~Metal Decking /li/1/6 rJIJ./1: -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --_L Electrodes £60:J:J -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Remarks .Lil -$~£c-rcc/7/;;;; J/2.SlltL L 8Z2a111 lf-;/Jc(IJJ,€!d;4£ oLJI/L/? ff RA,fe: It-:20 ~~ mClft/_ =~Ytz-;;:~::f~~:;~:!:~~:f:~~ /i/Jd-S7/ill)_ li1J .!AduJJ-c: ~ /IJ<JR I< 11r.ljj/)6, s -a-4 3 yJ M ckmit -s;l.s;J3 a s.SZll 111 Mtr15ss / d Field Representative ~-2:, ~ ;,;,:::-,- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME S?EjJl/-tn ,0 £/4 4£ ~ ' (Print Clearty) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE kz/i¾t ,>A~ 0:!6. (3t?Jt /_ic-11657 CERT. No. lCB<J 41/o .2 77/3-85 DATE 2-8--oa Formff003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 iNSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_(_ Project Name /u8Ci'/J2ME-UIT /{) 3 TESD Project# 9CJ-£'f'/;Z Address /_5:3, C:£&-R&}P' IJ:114 CM/.\5 ~ &'4 CA General I Subcontractor &1212, fhll,Vz/gc • / Building Permit #C/199tJS-R Q Cli2 J. i. c:;L;r:£1 DSA# _________________ _ ~·:.. Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry __ Struct Steel __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA __ OSHPD --Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING __ soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders __ Cone Flex Beams __ Rein!. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) _ ._ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms __ Masonry Block __ steel __ H.S. Bolts __ fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ ----:,faonc: Mix #/psi ~R'.nf'. Rebar IMfn: ~~-~ f/ Rmf. W.W.F. tlsfL !dt'8,..t., __ Rini: Tendons ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ Steel ______ _ H.S. Bolts _____ _ ££Metal Decking /JI/J/(:,14/1: Electrodes-'"£-""Z.,.,o..,.,2,_ _ _...~---_ __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ __ Slump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __Temperature ____ _ __Unit Weight ____ _ Consolidation----,--~ Electrode Storage~, __Torque Applied ___ _ __Load (Pounds) ___ _ __Thicknes~ ____ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Field Representativ~")~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. -$. /J. {3/{f /.;c-71-6S7 ,A ~ INSPECTOR'S NAM~1£jJ/lc11 J: n.612£5 CERT NO /CJ:?C) /(jJ 77/3-8 S° (Print Clearly) • · INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ Y1 ~44--= DATE :2_-/0-CJ 0 Form#003 ( Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of / -- Project Name tf/.1JC./-.1wtU: -Lor:9.f': TESD Project # ~9~9-_9',.._~.L..;/,_ ____ _ Address /tJZo uMdl,;, AV?; C&l(¼s&~ Ctf General I Subcontractor &rw, (!011.~T; J./l,,2,0a4<:T; QtJc/Z&(J'JY (£~~ Building Permit #_C_B.....,9~~-0_1 /_,.C.,._..._,2~-------DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~tans /!-£ wia.!L/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --_· __ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecifications /lr:V/£a'E/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes&/(c~ V Struct Steei-#'/3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ stump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block 1,-/ Electrode Storage lill.2:11211 --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --~Steel /JS]21 __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --....t:::::::::_Metal Deckino Ii 4/.f6 -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__tL Electrodes EC: 0 -::? ~? :.¾..--- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative # =?.: ;;-<2 -~ c;,- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME .S1£yfllEd /J&oac ~ (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ;/J~1,,- S, /). 01 "lj J.1c-7r 0S 7 # . CERT. No. lC/30-lo:z 1713·-~ S" DATE /-3/-00 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego·, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name 8/Ac/:maRE -/07' f/c TESD Project # _C/.....,f_·-_,_1./_,_L/,_{ _____ _ Address lt:2o Wdkly-,1-1/e;l U/ck,Mc4, Cit General / Subcontractor &110 Ca&5-z; {JJJ~ !rE1omlk: 11f1\ fri.EL Building Permit #f!/19£...JJ (.2 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST V Concrete __ $oil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --_L. Plans /k_W£W£.1. __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi / Specifications & VI&{,!£,/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi _Lsizes lied /.;,_(.li/i..c.l __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete ----1:'.'.'.'.'..Rinf: Rebar '4C,1Lc;-r.Jg,-& 0 __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --_/L_Rinf: w.w.FASTm %/4s-__ Air Content . __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ ==~7:::/:;~=~ ~r::::t::t:/:t~1::::zt::::t dlf<:-K c/Je:A? $/21:'.crls 1 JV4LoJEZlLdr-0 i5/J2 -1)it1.1 , &z Lias -L±z> 9 ct: &·-:to Ll / ~ / CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. $. LJ. O~Jic-'"ff 6-.5'7 INSPECTOR'S NAMES7Ep&d y1 Uyz .&A= CERT. No./Ct<sc'Y~/~Z77IS-8'g (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~A jl ti,,'U ll= DATE c2 -J ·-0 0 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name tl!.1-Jc/,(;n0/c£ -lift 9£: TESD Project# ___,_C/_,_f_-_,_,0+-41//f~----- Address /6c20 ti-tJRAc/1jl ./1y~~ LJtP.i.£A19c4 C'8 General/ Subcontractor &t20, Coo«; /i;IC {ba rr Building Permit #{;139&'?/6 ,;t.. DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Zconcrete __ Soil --Yconc: Mix #/psi 3/ooonj t/Plans ll£J!}0.t2/£L __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi .a·eci~~<ffed __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Struct Steel ~sphalt Concrete / Rini: Rebar 1)6 (S _s:::P·~ __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders -d ;/ Rini: W.W.F /jt;; tJ1 ff./8, S-__ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician ____ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed Remarks d& /VE/,4--r r/4:: c)oA (2/,7%-b2R 7/25 \'.f',£"Caoe/ t¼-Jo/J -121£7/tL, c/-;t:c):· /;4'/2CX?$7E -/:cJa/2, A:Z-: Z;·oo f}m., 7J& {]MCP~t//12/J xf,gaf£ ot2m4 ,;:;12c/f!atti4l}o7·';~tl£o/1 °7hE (i;oat:,; .1f17aw/fdz: (}Y?C',P,QE , {J oc, 7bcl h&c/s. a.£_tMcera:. v 'NA£ ~,J ,i>Fc4t/SE -CM<Y?E/2£ {()4,.$ Ol!M c:2/12 /2Pc; d/AaclJu;doa; d/m.14 aE!d#ZM 6nc/a.Ms (<' ~ -78 ;/Jttmjl ~tb12&1;;7X IL)f},5 ~LEcZ-l-::d~£42 e-9Ys~Cl0r'A7/tJ n &21< --. , · J • 8-::---·-·· ---.So m -- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME "5Vjl/..,t:"A /1 E2o£E s: (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~~,# ~ 0~ id. 0 l1jt );c.:.-#-6S 7 ~ CERT. No/Cea /O c2 7713-eg,- DATE d{-2-0Q Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_i_of _L Project Name ./i1Ac£illa/JE-Lor ~,f TESD Project# ~f:~f~_,t;...__,· ¾,...,.· ( _____ _ Address Melo ~/4/fi, C&.i..>Md C4 General I Subcontractor /}rJIJ. {?.(}~ ·5ot1,-z?2iJ'!JI ///c/4/;/11¢ Building Permit #lo/) Vf;, ?J i,i .;;2., DSA #_/ _______________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone ~asonry Struct Steer# /J '1 __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders _ ·_Cone Flex Beams __ Reinf. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms __ Masonry Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other __ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ __ Rinf: W.W.F. ____ _ __ Rini: Tendons ___ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ t,/steel l/':i7.2. J)Soo ~H.S. Bolts a ?,.2.,,_S::: __ Metal Decking ___ _ __ Electrodes ____ _ __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ __Slump _____ _ __Air Content ____ _ __Temperature ____ _ __Unit Weight ____ _ __Consolidation ___ _ __Electrode Storage __ _ __Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ Thickness ____ _ V Corrective action required '!/-( 4.,,.- __ Corrections completed __ (!) -7'1 &· ti 4· E> _,,.-/ , ,, Ir b . rr /J . I . I . . . Remarks //Iii A:,74 s-14' .(kjJ.:HJL-Z:-r ,fl7]Jv-=; ½<'Ix f?t 11-J<,r; Yo"& -/?.R11c.£.Sl;,0&>dE71J/L-"fS,/JL/ · -r)iac: -9 -/1,n, c ME 16a }E A11daadw /J<1t ~::1£L ""~ z& A:;;,? 5: ~ ~'~ ,97: -de M> ZAnc/!,l)ti,s;r: 'i7?)J4' t11if ,s', MA' 7,?E; , 02>J4,w1,;,. a? ~A' ~p;,&:mns ME /M$E IV1cUJ.7 -;/4:-tJJE.'1'.S;?;/1/lhlf ,xWJE ailrs ~ :J:!JiZz; ll'lCoU!Mai:: 11rlbis 7/ll'U -/l&Jo 70,d-;, SJid-t:X?. "d& 41 cX 'a~~ 6\ iMZEE/ -I/ /t "I( f '7 /( ", . f{ b // . _ < " , e,, M 1: -• -( • -•-lo. --- with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. -$, .(), C/§1 ~lc-'ff bS 7 CERT. N0./('6'.04 /l'.!;2 7 7/3-8:S INSPECTOR'S NAME , 27£/WM t! darf.f; E.5' (Print C earty) h1f1 y1~· INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~'¢1 ~ ._'A0.1 .,,1= DATE ,2 -s-ao Form#003 ,. Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name ~c / difoc·e 4, / .# PA Address /b;?O /4rc::r efo/ <?&'e TESD Project # .f?9-c/ t:./ / ~,-/4~/ General/ Subcontractor _.:;..h,,._,....,'A.-lc.=-........,. _________________________________ _ Building Permit# C,A' 96'3 /b ~ DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~ncrete V--Cone: Mix #/psi 360 Q__ .,,- __ Soil ---~S __ Prestress Cone __ Base ~Cone: Mix #/psi 30S3DOO ---~ecifications __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes __ Rini: Rebar ___f::::-Slump ~-¾" 5" __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete './.. I --I 1--- _. __ Fireproofing ~ Concrete Cylinders JE_ __ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons ~emperature 79" __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~solidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise sta ed, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME _g_o_N ___ e_~_/4.....,½=/=/41..----,---5.,..--_____ _ (Print Clearly) t{l:2. CERT. NO.-~"'-------- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE d c~ Form:i()r,.- Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Project Name Blackmore Lot 98, Bldg. A Project No 1999-441 Project Address ',1620 Faraday A{~1 Reno Contracting Sub-Contractor NIA Gen. Contractor Engineer ---------------Horowitz & Taylor Architect Smith Constulting Architects CB983162 Plan File No NIA Bldg Permit No Gov't Contract# ---------------NIA Report of Concrete -------- PI ace men t Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design (psi) Specified Strength 212100 HANSON 3053000 6SKHY 3000 3000 Sample Group # Cylinders D SA/OS HP D DSA# NIA 435 Slump Kelly Ball Air Temp Mix Temp Air Content Unit Weight (in.) (in.) (OF) (OF) (%) (pct) Measured Specified 5.00 NIA NIA NIA 79 NIA 69 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Time Sampled Age:~Min. Truck No. 343 Ticket#: 168580 Load # NIA Time Batched ---------No. Of Samples 4 Sampled at · ___ yards of ___ total yds. by: RC Sample Mark: SET RS.2 Precipitation NIA Wind NIA Stored at NIA -------------------Admixture NIA ----------NIA Gallons of water added at ...;,N.;;..:IA...;,_ __ by NIA Placement Method NIA Placement Location NIA Aggregate size Reinforcement NIA NIA Cement Type ____ _ ---------------- Specific Location 2ND FLOOR SLAB ON METAL DECK AT GRID LINE C/2.5. Special Instructions/Remarks Set# Delivered by CL Date Rec'd in Lab: 213100 Logged in by: NC ----Standard Tests: Special Tests: _1_cyls at 7 days; _o_cyls at _O_days; _o_cyls at 14 days; _._2_cyls at 28 days; _1_cyls at 56 days. _o_cyls at _O_days; _o_cyls at _O_days. _O_cyls at Q days. Compression Laboratory Data Sample Lab No. Date Tested Dimensions Test Area Max Load Compressive Age Strength 7 36545 2/9/00 6x12in 28.27in2 78,500 lbs 2780 psi 28 36546 3/1/00 6x12in 28.27in2 104,000 lbs 3680 psi 28 36547 3/1/00 6x12in 28.27in2 105,000 lbs 3710 psi 56 36548 3/29/00 6x12in 28.27in2 lbs DISC psi Comments: 28 day test complies with project specifications. All sampling and testing conducted in acmnce with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 "?j . I Checked by: _____ __."LJ.-.(----Date: __ Reviewed by: _ _.@'-=-'-(} _______ Date:~ cc: Reno Contracting Horowitz & Taylor Smith Constulting R. Douglas Provins, PE Blackmore City of Carlsbad Signal Hill Lot • Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc . REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST Blackmore Lot 98, Bldg. A Project No 1999-441 Project Name Project Address Gen. Contractor Engineer ------- 1620 Faraday Ave Reno Contracting Sub-Contractor NIA ----------------Horowitz & Taylor Architect Smith Constulting Architects CB983162 Plan File No NIA Bldg Permit No Gov't Contract# ---------------N/A D SA/OS HP D DSA# NIA Report of Concrete ---------PI ace men t Date Supplier/Plant Mix Number Mix Description Mix Design (psi) Specified Strength 2/2/00 HANSON 3053000 6SKHY 3000 3000 Sample Group # Cylinders 436 Slump Kelly Ball Air Temp Mix Temp Air Content Unit Weight Truck No. 601 Ticket#: 168399 Load# N/A Time Batched No. Of Samples 4 Sampled at ___ yards of ___ total yds. by: RC Precipitation NIA Wind N/A Stored at N/A Measured (in.) 5.75 (in.) N/A (OF) 78 (OF) 70 (%) N/A (pct) N/A Time Sampled Sample Mark: SLB-1 Specified N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A Age:~ Min. --------------------Admixture N/A ----------N/A Gallons of water added at N/A ----by N/A Placement Method N/A Placement Location N/A Aggregate size Reinforcement NIA N/A Cement Type ____ _ ---------------- Specific Location 2ND FLOOR SLAB ON METAL DECK AT GRID LINE 8/7.5. Special Instructions/Remarks Set# Delivered by CL Date Rec'd in Lab: ---- Standard Tests: cyls at 7 days; 0 cyls at 14 days; -- Special Tests: __ o _cyls at _o_days; 0 cyls at 0 days; -··---- 2/3/00 2 cyls at -- 0 cyls at --- Compression Laboratory Data Sample Lab No. Date Tested Dimensions Test Area Max Load Age 7 36541 2/9/00 6x12in 28.27in2 78,000 lbs 28 36542 3/1/00 6x12in 28.27in2 101,000 lbs 28 36543 3/1/00 6x12in 28.27in2 99,000 lbs 56 36544 3/29/00 6x12in 28.27in2 lbs Comments: 28 day test complies with project specifications. Logged in by: NC 28 · days; cyls at 56 days. -- 0 days. 0 cyls at 0 days. ---- Compressive Strength 2760 psi 3570 psi 3500 psi DISC psi All sampling and testing conducted· accordance with ASTM Standard designations: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 Checked by: ----....---1--,-----Date: __ Reviewed by: __ e._D._P ________ Date:~ R. Douglas Provins, PE cc: Reno Contracting Horowitz & Taylor Smith Constulting Blackmore City of Carlsbad Signal Hill Lot TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY' RAHWAY' FT. LAUDERDALE' ORLANDO' SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT BLACKMORE-LOT 98 PROJECT NO. 99-441 PROJECT ADDRESS 1620 FARADAY, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR RENO CONSTRUCTION ---------------------------- ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER SMITH CONSULTING/ HOROWITZ & TAYLOR BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 983162 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUTD PRISMS D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 12/17/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI ------------- MIX NUMBER 355P MIX DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CEMENT C-150, TYPE IIN TICKET NO. ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N SLUMP SPECIFIED MIXING TIME 108 PERCENT AIR CONCRETE TEMP. DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 72 AIR TEMP. 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY @' PANEL:-~21\ LABORATORY DATA 12/20/99 3000 3000 PSI, 5.5 SK 164369 NIA SLUMP 4.00" N/A 70 S.P. FLORES AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 5 33356 12/22/99 6X12 28.27 73,000 2580 7 33357 12/24/99 6X12 28.27 81,500 2880 28 33358 1/14/00 6X12 28.27 114,000 4030 28 33359 1/14/00 6X12 28.27 112,000 -396.0, H 33360 2/11/00 6X12 28.27 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO (2) 28-DAYTESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 ?vf DATE: DATE: '/1 '( I (Jt.! TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY' RAHWAY' FT. LAUDERDALE 'ORLANDO' SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT BLACKMORE-LOT 103 PROJECT NO. 99-441B PROJECT ADDRESS 1535 FARADAY, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR RENO CONSTRUCTION ---------------------------- ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER SMITH CONSULTING/ HOROWITZ & TAYLOR BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 990520 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF 18] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUTD PRISMS D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 12/17/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI ------------- MIX NUMBER 355P MIX DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CEMENT C-150, TYPE IIN TICKET NO. ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N SLUMP SPECIFIED MIXING TIME 63 PERCENT AIR CONCRETE TEMP. DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 65 AIR TEMP. -3000,@ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY @' PANEL~#-42, LABORATORY DATA 12/20/99 3000 3000 PSI CONC, 5.5 SK 164332 N/A SLUMP 3.50" N/A 54 S.P. FLORES AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 5 33351 12/22/99 6X12 28.27 70,000 2480 7 33352 12/24/99 6X12 28.27 80,000 2830 28 33353 1/14/00 6X12 28.27 111,000 3930 28 33354 1/14/00 6X12 28.27 114,000 -40@0, 56 33355 2/11/00 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 ~ DATE: DATE: '/1...t\c~v I Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name li!;:,r,l(mae;;; -98: TESD Project# _,f'-· 9,__-_½._'//,,_,_'/ _____ _ Address 16,:Zo .~c1, It/I.El C11tVsbc/4 C& General / Subcontractor fkao, {1~, IJ,IJ, //JdiJ?'Jc&£, &th.if Building Permit #C898...J1~ .7-, DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry __ Struct Steel __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out ......k:::::Roofing-rlf IC, 7 __ Waterproofing __ 0SA __ QSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders __ Cone Flex Beams __ Reinf. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms __ Masonry Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ ~ans -'. -, pecilications · ~ - -tL--Sizes:&io£W€c. __ Rini: Rebar ____ _ __Slump _____ _ __ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __ Rini: Tendons ____ _ __Temperature ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __Consolidation ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ __ Electrode Storage __ _ Units: Block ____ _ __Torque Applied ___ _ Steel ______ _ __Load (Pounds) ___ _ H.S. Bolts _____ _ Thickness ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ __ Electrodes ____ _ __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ . Other ______ _ __ Conectiveaction required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ ;;;;;[:::t::;,,z-;;;;;:::::~h::t::::111, ::;;;;~~~ ~;:;;;_ )11,;--r-37-02s57A-3G-L-ST/f l8"' SZJ¼jls 1)~ li(l)o-T t;b:;m1~ /(JJA/2-c,,fhEET~. 7 ' 'u 7 Field Representative#~~~ ~~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. u. iJ. 0 l'{jt J.1 c. _-# ts 7 INSPECTOR'S NAME,S:7£,11.&'Ed /1 Ho I<..€ 5' (Print Clearly) l~SPECTOR'S SIGNATURE -~ )-z".-f1,._,z_,,_,,'lc:c": DATE/-/2-6 Q Forml/003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_L Project Name /iJ.Ac/<;na,RE-,/,a7$f:' TESD Project# --1-f_,_f__·-_,_/J~f....L.I ____ _ Address /6,-26 ~& 11£1C,9,e/.5/Jftc~ /?fl- General/ Subcontractor &-40, l?1v1c;z; xJ.,ILt/Jdizl;c£J£ < tJaa57"" Building Permit #(1__.fs 98'ul t, 9----DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN~TION C~ECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ---"'=~ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi 19.~::ficatio~ • = · ; ? ___K_ Struct Stee#/,3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rinf: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block ~ectrode Storage,#'-"J,:-::: --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --Vsteel A?&> __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --Y Electrode,sE7/t-cL -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ • i Field Representative #-~--~-=--~--:...e--~--------- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,S. J). tJ )7) J. IC----# tf-S 7 INSPECTOR'S NAME S7E/JIIF4 11 /loR6S / (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE~ t~2,l,,< CERT. No./C4o4 /o.2 77/.3 -8-S DATE /·-J:2.-e> c) Form//003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _J_ Project Name Bl/Jc£/)}1()/JJ;:-lc»7= <Jr TESD Project# _9-,-· _?_-_,_f/--<-£,__( ____ _ Address /Cd,?CJ ~ /JI/£, C'MJv;,(J~C/f General I Subcontractor 1/4;-;,1(2, Co/l<;'-z; 0a<dKU/;f (L}£:k/2f/ Building Permit #C/r Cj~C. c2--DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~ans &/L!€_a_)t;.,../ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi :ecification~~ __ Masonry --~ubgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~1zes~ ~Struct Steetf /07 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --VSteel -~';{7..'.:2... __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --_i,L.H.S. Bolts /4 R2 S:: --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ Remarks lltwl2-l'fi 01(sy:,cc?1:c/.-dii M$7iU,UWcil/J a EA c;zp, -S12:E.L-t/Jlrk ~ &11m5 ~~~:~~ 1&;;::~1;;t;;,-:!::::f:t::J~4?J:::;l1; < i/},1~£./4·,Wil dz 1M~rs AT' ·-dzk ZlM .. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ,S~#E11 ;D /lo /? £..5' (Print creaify) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~Ai t :i(L_vz ,(/I-= S, fl. el§t J.;c:? 657 CERT. No/Ci?0-"/(/tJ,Q77li3 ~ts= DATE l-/t'-oo Formli003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name lfJAdOJfi,{J,E -l.07 9-? TESD Project # -9-1-1--CJ·_-_,__l/_,_i/_,_/ ____ _ Address /(,.,;zo ,uu>Mt,wA~ CBk!ls/29/, Cit General I Subcontractor ~ -~~1144 0oud~ /f/1-:/c/la~ Building Permit #C/?9Sf.31~ ~ DSA # __ ~-------------- Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~-osa __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ cone: Mix #/psi ~pecific ·ons , · · 1/. · ./ ~asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes 'I __ S!ruct Steef /$; __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Reinl. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ---Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --V Steel ,'9.5:72. __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ---1L.__H.S. Bolts ~ bZS---Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ~ield Representative # &~ ~____::;;t:~~J.J-=__:; CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME\ T!E)l&//2 P £l(1l<E S: • • Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ;IJ ~_,,____ "5,)J. a~yL1c--4 t:J--·7 -# CERT. NO_/;,,RQ /o27J/J-85 DATE /-/9·-DO Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION 'REPORT Page_1_of .;2__ Project Name r/r!s-e/unotrE-Lat 97' TESD Project # ___._,C/_._C/_-_,_i/_,i/c....1.I_· ____ _ Ad~ress /£2<2 &Mc'1f llllii:l C&Us/21l-c/4 OU General I Subcontractor ~4{) , f}J1~7'7 ~Sbv@ /};£{/ tU;E/4,//JSI Building Permit# CB 98,9/6;?., f" DSA # __ / ______________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone _;aasonry _V'_ !':SttructStee1#/,.s·~ /il/1 /67 __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving Non-Destructive Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPD __ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders __ Cone Flex Beams __ Reinf. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms __ Masonry Block __ steel __ H,S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other ___ _ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Rinf: Rebar ____ _ __ Slump _____ _ __ Rinf: W.W.F. ____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __ Rinf: Tendons ____ _ __ Temperature ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Unit Weight ____ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ __ Consolidation ____ _ VElectrode Storage ~ __ Units: Block ____ _ ~Steel /2Q~/)S4 ~H.S. Bolts..,,L/,_;,A,.l.%l~~s:_ __ _ __ Torque Applied ___ _ __ Load (Pounds) ___ _ __Thickness ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ ~Electrodes £7(2/ ff' __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ __ Correctiveaclionrequired __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Field RepresentativeC-~ ::::>,_.. ( ::zB CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. .S.£J.O/ffe J.1c:!l607 CERT. No/C'.i(J71-/6,2 77/3-/?.5( INSPECTOR'S NAMW-7ir-'&°IZ /JfLotfE, S ' (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥>? j1 -iJLJJU.,~ DATE /-;20 -00 Forrn/1003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92111 TO: N:i1u.C0n>T ~LO REPORT 0 NOTICE TO COMP' 'Y P .,.., L age c::z<= Of ;;:J_ Date Job Number Permit Number Plan File Number } , 3-8'6""' Form#001 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _J_ Project Name /Ji AclmolcC ~ Lo 7-9£" TESD Project# __,_9...L..9_-_,_f/_,_· // ....... / ____ _ Address /~rQo D1Mcl1f IJvc; C/l-&s1Mt4C11: General I Subcontractor k~-4/4'1,.._c.,_1..._. ,....(i-c-·(24· //l.'-". -5~0'--,---------------------------- Building Permit #Cfi 98r V 6 a2,, DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~lans &Jt/£/$t/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi >--;pecif~on~_!~Vl~t/w __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes ~l.§.,,2. =z--struct Stee1-ff/0 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon {PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~onsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage~ --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --_Lsteel £~, /lC:Z,2 ~ ) __ Load (Pounds) ,~ J __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__L_H.S. Bolts fl.:?.2£' __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --//Electrodes £ 70 If?: -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --_Lother Ei.Ec.711.adt..-__ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --El[t--fULl./s.,{}., 12) __ Corrections completed __ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ..__5--ft-lJI/Lt2 ,/J llotl<. £ 5 ~ (Print Clearly) JNSPECTOR'SSIGNATURE ¥ l1-ik.£A S, J), ()1j)1e-<ff bS7 CERT. No. lCBc/1/<J:2 '71/3-ff S DATE /--,2 I--Qc) Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 1/28/2000 99-441B BLACKMORE LOT 103 1535 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 104 NIA CB990520 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH:, PE Established 1946 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on l/11/00-1/18/00. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (6) Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-581 0 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ TESD Project# ---'-C)'c-~-'-----~,__'--'-t.j-C./_/1"""'· __ f}J ,) General / Subcontractor ~ ~ ~/ lL O' fl-1 &J h} 7a C y -e... Building Permit # L~ f1 99-IJ !£J. (} DSA# __________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~Plans __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi -5-specificalions ~asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes _I_Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --___ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --___ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block ~ectrode Storage Mechanical ----__ Grout Samples Lsnits: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --teel ./1..4.. 61/1 :;if-;;·· /J __ Load (Pounds) __ H.S. Bolts __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --___ Thickness ----__ Roofing __ Steel __ tyletal Decking __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --/Electrodes li70J ~ -- __ DSA •' __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other --Specialty __ Other -- Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, i specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ~/ L IL (;i(!Ti£-? p (Printfearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ tC. ~ -- ___ Corrective action required __ Corrections completed ormance with the approve.d·.plans and -~~-.,, .' -;:-· •n ~-'· •.• •; I 'j \ ,, d:-; ··-\\ f-•'111 " ··-;gJY /:;£/:=---· CERT. NO.----------'---'----"--- DATE_/_-_/_/_-c_7 d ___ ~~ Formll003 .,,,;·~. Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _/_ Project Name /fJ4c/(ll1t1£F ~iaT /t) 3 TESD Project# ~9~C/-~t/-·fi..,_/=/3 ____ _ Address /SC.,r-.s-M~lkt4r AIIJ;; C-9R/4C:bA-dr Cit- General I Subcontractor lv1/l!J. &11..>7; I)_ A. Lt!/2/1&Q{J,E . {b11-s-r Building Permit #C,B 9'.9o. >d a DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ $oil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --z:;:-l'llans &io_'p-l.11,/::_d._ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecifications /?EJtiEIIJl!c/ ~asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi _JL__Sizes /)1:J(~ LU&,/ __ Struct Steel 1f /S 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi z:nsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block · Electrode Storage F --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --~ts:Block __ Torque Applied Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --_·_steel 4, ?to __ Load (Pounds) -- __ Bolt Pull-Out --Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H,S. Bolts ----~lectrodes Ell t-8' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed Field Representative~ _,,.....,b ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME07£ji#'£12 /J llot2,F' $' (Print ciearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥# ~W.R 11= s, IJ. crgt J.1c-:il 65 7 CERT. No/Ci8o #;12,27713 -S?S DATE /-/;;2 -0 0 FormH003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name IJLfJc,lmaA'E:. -lo 7 /CJ 3 TESD Project # ___,9,-9._-~Lf.--' £-1--.ls_._· ---- Address /s--; i'.5:"Mll.4:d/r:J' lff~,~0&4 {?& General I Subcontractor ffeAd ( ~ d t9 @Ai&ca 6ta57: Building Permit #C/3 994 S:,RO DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~lanskf'&_W£c/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecif&io~s (/~Y!F ILi&./ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes __}£/(/..£if) 5 2.. ~ Struct Steilf /..j' 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rinf: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~solidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block Electrode Storage •f4== --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --/steel i&1~ __ load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts ----;;7' Electrodes £7t2/f: -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Reid Representativ~ ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,S./J. f!~ )ic-c/1-6S7 INSPECTOR'S NAME I Y"/1:p/J-&J yj f20/i?Ji0· (Print Clearly) CERT. No/{zrd~ o r2 T7 /3 -,f.S- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ t ::;!k ,,.,_,_.-DATE /-/3-(JO Formff003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _/_ Project Name /VAc/<1YJOl?.£'.-loZ-/0,·1 TESD Project # _£,_,f,_-~1(,,_¾,...,_/.._:/J'------ Address /6<,,l 5=,UM'ltdf/ Iii/£; CMd5~ CA General / Subcontractor &1c1 ,{htAf:7'i x2 IJ:, /IA1/L.t!fc&'E . Ch:l25L Building. Permit #CBC} C/o,t:;;;;? 0 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --Vpians/4~ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi -;;:specif~funs~~ r/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes. 'r /it£ l,f_Je rJ.. ~truct Steel 1r/J7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi 7.onsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block _'_ Electrode Storage ~ Mechanical __ Grout Samples Units: Block __ Torque Applied ---- Vsteel /}s,l_~ --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --_!L.Electrode,:, L' fil/fi'. -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. S. A. 0F1j-l.!c-4 657 INSPECTOR'S NAME ·..,,572yJIIE/l '/J /Jol?J;'S: (Print Clearly) "ft . CERT. No/Ciro /0.2 77;.J-,?-.S: INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥All t~~ DATE I-IY-120 Form/1003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name is.ulcll/J0/2.F --lt>'T/{13 TESD Project # __,,9__,g~---(y_'l_,_l_,_./-s~--- Address 15:"ZS: ~ 4111',-C/J.,IJlsiJ1t<4 CIJ General/ Subcontractor M/iJ(),. ~ zcl IJ /()d;L/JG1//E, (Jd/J,5;7 Building Permit# CA 91asc2.c,) DSA# _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --Z2{'.ans $,j/_/Eld&/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecif'Jtion~Etf./Fc/ ~onry ,::ff __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi izes~fJ::.Vl£U)Et/ · Struct Steel i.J 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~solidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block Electrode Storage'i/"4=:: --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --Vsteel A:3C? __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --_/L...E1ectrodesC:Za/? -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --1/ Other -£'1£..c.7J1o. ell! -__ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --j:' ZJ.'7:: e(.l).t.f_,:;> ... y;;i_). __ Corrections completed • CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is m confer a specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME'-.5z;--4>#EA /J /Z9,,tf'E ~ ( rint Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~M#Ar1.1, ~ Sr /J. eo/-/,;c _'ti 6S 7 CERT. No/c.Bd',r>o;? 77/3-ifS- DATE /-[7-f)O Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name .6JAck/12o/2E -ioz·jo 3 TESD Project# 99-1/ /..//is Address /~ r"> Hll<&c/Jyt/2~, /JrM,i,5:~. C.&: General / Subcontractor /l/'i4CJ. ~(111,, <Z;, 0, d //J/2i71J&E, Ct1//~ Building Permit# CJJ99a 'tr:2 e) DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPEC ION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --Plans f?Ett@fl::~!!_ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ cone: Mix #/psi VSpecm;qr.~s,4kVICIIJh} ~asonry __ subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi /sizes _1£i{lli,.c/)if<? __ Struct Steefl//.:.3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rinf: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix JI/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~onsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode StorageF --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --ZUnits: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --Steel A zr.,. __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --J../ Electrodes -UO/ fc -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --_____fL_Other ~oc/e:.. -__ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other ~-z.a;_ fCt}.& 610'~ __ Corrections completed CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME S-;~1 tllo&L> (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ;tl~.,fku ,<c- -S. /41 _ co; )1c :ti h57 CERT. No./C/J, o40c,:z 77/3~/?.s- DATE /-/?-eJO Forml/003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _J_ Project Name 6Joc£ma£J:; -Lo T frf' TESD Project # ____,_9+-7_-i/,_,_· ¾-/-Jjf------- Address /~.:?CJ Cl9tt<,f)~ Ai&;1 OM/..s' ./24~ Cit General I Subcontractor &4a,0,111.."4 .__ir,V7ii ~ I/)~ Building Permit #C8f£ 1/C:,;l DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# _____ ~ __________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ___________ Other-------------------,- INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --±:ans~~ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi =fz:eci6t:.:. = IF~/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi zes '£/2££U"'E.d _/L.struct Steel 1f/37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi =z:solidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block Electrode Storage ~-'J--: --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --'91eel d,.fC;,IJ.~Z:2. __ Load (Pounds) l __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --~.s. Bolts lf..1:;,;;: __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking /)L;-J/fc, -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~ Electrodes Z:ZCJ/l? -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --__L.other .£/~c.712(}(;k. -__ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --£7LZ:~.2c1~ __ Corrections completed ::;,ks;;;:~~~1=~~=-r:0~1~:'?;£~:,u. ~=~;;:;=~~U:::fl:t=:;;;:r:::;;:;,7J:::&~ ~~7!::l;;:-1:~~x;1:~::~I> M Field Representative~~ ~ / CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME07E,/11.;'ti /J fl~£'£ 5 ( rint Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ... JhJJ£'4 /J -:/_/µuLI- _s: I). a? J.1c-" ~ 7 -ti CERT. NO. ;c,Bo lo& 77/3-JJ,,-: DATE /-211-00 Fnrmunn::i Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_L Project Name /Jjl}c/<mo& £ -Jo T.9f" TESD Project# -7t-9t---f+-'l..+-1,__I ____ _ Address /tg d W/ldy Jr~ ~c4 Cl/ General I Subcontractor &nor Ou15TJ Cf/) & . Co/l'J,S7t l)6lf' IC 61,· /,{)rlcl-jy Building Permit # _______________ DSA # ___________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN~TION ~HECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ cone: Mix #/psi --~1an~&r1~I __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~~eci]~ns3dtr,/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes fr'~c/ ~Struct Steel 1/;s 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ------Units: Block _L__ Electrode Storage'f}:J--1)1/JS//.}J. 3 --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ------LL.steel . .a t:;;z ~ ,a i0 __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --~tal Deckinp /lf(/1?, -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --Electrodes £4:;Q,!:l ~ -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed .:;;i7!:~:::1-~t::/:;:::::!2~%:.t:;J:~;:Jt:;t:;::f ::;_hf7 La,z~ #.LaLJ h.M-~02?d11 (})/}_£ U.,f1ac,?t; ~ ·zAe: tLJ/J/dk 111 ./Jfh/&ESS 67'.Z-/2e: ' I ~ ' I °"?Ecooc/ ¼L.st? Jc Vc:L • Field Representative # ___ 7-r-;fc,, __ "-~-r-~----/------ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,s,/J. D1/J/cff6s7 CERT. No/C&:>~ /0,2 77/3'-&_$-INSPECTOR'S NAME -Sr'q'JltD1 .tti(l,nffrl/4)s INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE -i-b;IA-&1 t~;t_k-14= DATE /-,2J·-OQ Fnrmunnq Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 2/4/00 99-441B BLACKMORE LOT 103 1535 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 170 NIA CB990520 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH, PE Established 1946 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 1/25/00-1/28/00. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These repo1is do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these rep01is, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (5) Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 (858] 715-5800 Fax (858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L_ Project Name /ib;c/</JJtr t£Ji:'. -la T /03 TESD Project # _C}_,_· ..__9-_§.L.-. ___,_i/,__,/li ____ _ Address ls'-}-5-~f= fl/I~-(}J~/ ~blJd; Cft General I Subcontractor lirl1<.1_ Cao.s·r; i).11 I/J/);D;-ct?.£, Ctt4 c;z-//le BuildingPermit#Cf327o'6,RQ DSA# _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry ~Struct Steel '!f/.J; __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ OSA --OSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders __ Cone Flex Beams __ Reinf. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms --Masonry Block __ steel __ H.S.Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other ___ _ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ a,::.,~,-.. : : __ Sizes /1.£11/i:ILl/t t/ __ Rini: Rebar ____ _ __Slump _____ _ __ Rini: W.W.F. ____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __ Rinf: Tendons ____ _ __Temperature ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __Unit Weight ____ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ ~Steel __,_;£,.,__,_._?,,,.b_ ___ _ __ Consolidation ____ _ ~lectrode Storage~ __ Torque Applied ___ _ __Load (Pounds) ___ _ H.S. Bolts _____ _ Thickness ____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ ;/ Electrodes E7ol?' __ Fireproofing ____ _ __ Other ______ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __ Corrections completed __ _ Field Representative#-::.-:---:;~~--==== CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME --S:frJ~ p li,(l{f;.,¢ INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ t 'I~ CERT. NO.----------- DATE l-o2.S-oa Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name tficL6CtCtno.&£-Ldr/o. i TESD Project# 29-i./L/i/j Address LS:s:s::: Mllo/ ;L}l(p/ Catte/4.s.6.&a( C/f: General I Subcontractor dkt1ac OotJ,vj ,~. I) t (l/AiT1tcR& C Cot1-S/T Building Permit# C/B qq a,s.-2 C) DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD #-~--------------- Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Concrete __ soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~lans&~uW -- ~~:~fil:_;~Z __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~truct Steef#'/J7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~solidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage~ --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --~ Steel l:J:S_{e __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --~ Electrode" £7(;j/$' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ CorrectiveactJon required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Remark~ ~MyiEe1cd@A: /d1,5//il~77614 oE ,{-SEA;t;,,.S 00/~s·xs 19:«uL fj-/-.:roA:_5f/.&$4? <: /JT£ME. < -I·-;2 -3 -'/ ·-o-Jle1< do?bis -~Z-19/s/Js-18/sll?·-7/s0f. 7/2e:M<;Zlt}i- ~=:£::f:;jts~ tti:~=::::;;;r;;~_::f;4£r;::;~ /dJ;;:-z: {ft EL£5' 1f; L9 fZQ?/ib/md//:/d ~ Field Representative# ~ ft CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,5, /), C 17 J IC:__....,Yt.!J-? INSPECTOR'S NAMEc. 9!EjJfli¥1 ltiOffS CERT NO IC/?cf /(262 77/J-f?'.S- (Pnnt Clearly) · • INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ yJ~.f.4= DATE /-,:2~-ao Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name 15,/Ac; /<ff}tMPf--/.a T /() 3 TESD Project# _9+-9,_-_'-1_,_· /--1-/. 1-1-/ fr,.._· ___ _ Address /£, 1.,5" U4 4-ci?JI If ta;-DueJ.s/J191ft Cd General/ Subcontractor Akoo,{}o!JSZ;, /}_ d t{J/2,11f;c-14'E. Ca(IJ,S:1 Building Permit#{?(} 990,QQ DSA# ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN:,:TIO~ C~E~KLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~Jans /ik W-t(,J ~,l .. __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecifications{ttif2J t/4asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi zes /it:1£. i - Struct Steel 1f /37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~onsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block _· _ Electrode StoragejkR--fH4/J/,. --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --.v"'steel fl l C.,, IA2. ~5 !10 __ Load (Pounds) I __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__ H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts ---61ectrodes: £16 /f: --• __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --/ Other Elcct't«-dE.. -__ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --,£/lt::~2-3:i) __ Corrections completed CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, . specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. 1..S.,/), 0 <7j J1c~# ts7 i INSPECTOR'S NAME S7E)ll'/:IZ ~tJi 0 ii£S CERT. No./Ct>a4io.;z77 As-&~ INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ktji-1,w jJ~,__ DATE L-c2]·-oo Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page_1_of_L San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name ,r/VAcl<maez ., Lt,r IO ) TESD Project# ---.9 ...... 9~-_,f,_,:r;_,_1...,.,8~---- Address A<U:S ~Af /JIIE1 CIJi</4~/;A~.CA General/ Subcontractor /il-:,;uJ, th.as:?; i}.d {,(//;)&c/?c-. CtM-SZ) c >01.1d~t//1r4/;iJ·;r Building Permit #C,8 i7o.S 2 O DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ cone: Mix #/psi --/ Plans /Ji.tf t:J~/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Specildtio~". ffe-YiEtL/E/ · Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi / Sizes ..Jfi..i!ie:.t./.!£d -;;;7" Struct Stee1:ff /37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi -;/ Consolidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block _/L_ Electrode Storage~-/iJJsjl)J, ; --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --~Steel ~-i'.~, I}. ~(2 Q __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --t,/ H.S. Bolts d, r,.:f2,,5" __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --ZElectrodes £7/J/'¼, £'7ifa(r -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative # £-dJ (j CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,5,/(). t11j /.1cf1t:S7 INSPECTOR'S NAME0Z9A,1 f!EJt?A.£ 5 (Print Clearly) ~ cERT. No.lCBo /02 Z7/3--8S- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ t -u~ DATE /-c2[{-oo Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92111 Project: l?/4cf_mME-/47JtJ3 ~LO REPORT NOTICE TO COMPLY Page d?.. of 2 Date Job Number -.2J'-oo Permit Number Form#001 c-J o B -# f/<1-/.j 1(/ !3· --jJJtL~Jui1'Lfyu_~ I O 3 CIJ9C/0S.2.o-/535 -::/~ l}u.JL SET lOT NO. W8091 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE ~~-C If UNYTITE, INC. Specification Size ASTM A325 Type 1 -TI · ASTM A 563·Grade DH· XX. -93 ASTM F436 Type 1. XX :..:..a93 _ 3/4-10 UNC X 3-3/4 BOLT LOT NO. · W8091 · M·echa:!7i.caJ Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment Tensile Strength Proof load Hardness °F (°C) Load Position of 284001bf. Quantity One Unytite Drive . Peru, 1 llinois 613 54 815-224-2221 -FAX# 815-224-3434 i$ 9,589 pcs. Date: Oct 1 6 '98 I IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 1 00 X 100 X 10,000 (lbf) fracture (length Method) HRC Quench I Temper 0 C Si Mn p S Cu I Ni I Cr I Mo l B Min. Spec. Part of Screw Mean/3 Pcs. Part of Screw! NUT LOT NO. I0482 .. Hardness . . · After 24 hr Hardness x 1000° F (HRC) HRB Min. Spec. 24: 38 HRB 89 -Mean/5pcs 30.1 WASHER LOT NO. ,1649 Max. +!-0.0005 in. 25 -34 GOOD 32.'i Heat Treatment °F (°C) Proof load (Lbf) Quench Temper Min. .ti84.t;f. --850 G,0OD 1562 1220 Min. 800 1580 851 IDENTIFICATION ~ Q He;at No. S32056 30 Min. Max. Max. 5 Heat No. 52 __ 60 40 50 _ __ ----30 A61284 31 25 82 11 13 2 1 6 1 15 Chemical Composition % Thread Accuracy C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (Bolt & Nut) X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Bolt ANSI 81.1 20 Min. Max .. Max. Class 2A -55· 60 40 50 ----Nut ANSI 81.1 Class 2B 44 21 69 8 31 23 12 8 Fastener Tension -~ Chemical Composition % IDENTIFICATION Fastener Tension REMARKS Hardness C Si Mn p s Cu Ni ~HRC) © X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 .. . . Max . Max. . . Hea·t No. . Spec. 35.-45 ' --· -40 50 --. ., Mean/5 Pcs. 40.4 il.75385 52 17 62 12 ~ 1 -.. . - Material.Used for-the Bolt, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. We hereb·y·_ certify tl;Jat th~ material described has. been manufactured and inspected Satisfactorily witn the reauiremPnt nf thP ::1hm,o cnorlfi,--,~:~~ - - Min. Cr Spec. X 100 (lbf.) ?q400 Mean/ 5 sets. 33646 - ~ Standard -Deviation 1704 ChiefJ°f Quality Assu]r.Jce Section 0... _L__ n 11 ;:jo as _-r, YY.-I-If/ ts. -~c,/i,711,c;.;u-/__cPt Io 3 SET LOT NO. X0021 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE UNYTITE, INC . " Specification Size Quantity . -.. ASTM A325 Type 1 -Y .j : ASTM A 563 Grade DH .XX -93 7/8-9 UNC X 5-1/2 ASTM F436 Type 1 .?(X. -;-9 3 2,000 pcs . • One Unytite Drive Peru, Illinois 61354 815-224-2221 -FAX # 81 5-224-3434 BOLT LOT NO. .. xo.n)n Date: Oct.291 '98 _·Mech_a-njcal Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION I Chemical Composition% Tens·pe ?.trength Proof Load Hardness OF (OC) 0 I C I Si I Mn I P I S I Co I NI I C, I Mo I B Load Position or 39250lbL X 1 00 X 100 X 100 X 1 000 X 1 000 X 1 00 X 1 00 X 100 X 1 00 X 10,000 (lbr) fracture (length Method) HRC Quench Temper ~ Min. Max. Min. I 30 I I Min. I Max. I Max. I I I I I 5 ·55451 J'art ol Screw +!-0.0005 in. 25 -34 --800 Heat No. I 52 __ 60 40 50 __ __ --30 Spec. I Mean/3 Pcs. 71 0 3 tart of Scre_wl GOOD I 33.~ 1580 I 851 I A62611 l 31 l 24 I 831 1 1 I 121 sl 2 I 51 1 I 17 NUT LOT NO. 10371 .. . Hardness Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Thread Accur_acy · After 2_4 hr OF (OC) 1Q'1 Hardness x1000°F Proof load C Si Mn (HRC) HRB (lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 ~J Min. Min. 20 Min. -Spec. . ~4 -38 HRB 89 80850 --850 He.at No . 55 60 Mean/5pcs. -GOOD 1562 21 74 27. 5 · 1058 B67357 44 WASHE~ LOT NO. J616 IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition% ' Hardness .c Si Mn p s Cu Ni · · (HRC) (QJ X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 Max. Max. .. Sp_ec. · 38 -4 5 Heat No. · -----40 50 - . Mean/5 Pe·s:; . -· ·, 40.2 ; B31722 51 20 71 15 15 - Materia.1 U:;~d for the Bolt, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. ·w~ hereby ce·rtify that tlie ~aterial described has been manufactured and inspected s~ti·sfadb:ilY with ~-~e requirement of the above specification . . . . .,, -- - p s Cu Ni Cr (Bolt & Nut) X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Bolt ANSI B1.1 Max. Max. Class 2A 4(:) 50 -----Nut ANSI 81.1 Class 2B 8 18 1 1 6 Fastener Tension Fastener Tension REMARKS Min. Cr Spec. X 100 (lbf.) 40950 Mean / 5 sets. 49646 -- Standard -Deviation 1640 ·et of Quality A surance Section L 7 .. / II 00 D ·-...,.. 7 7-11 / /j --: D-J.....t..U..qp_rv•'UY (...(_ -.1-01 1 '-' ..) SET ,LOT N'o. X4821 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE Specification· ... Size Quantity ASTM A325 Type 1 ·';j :J ASTM A 563 Grade DH-_XX -93 7/8-9 UNC X 2-1/4 ASTM F436 Type 1 '-XX -:-93 32,815 pcs . ., UNYTITE, INC. One Unytite Drive Peru, Illinois 61354 815-224-2221 -: FAX# 815-224-3434 . . BOLT LOT NO.. X4821 Date:. Se:g.22 1 1 99 Meclian"ical Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION I Chemical Composition % Tensile ·strength Proof Load Hardness °୴F c0c> 0 I C I Si \ Mn \ P \ S \ C" I N; I c, I Mo I B Load Position of 392sqbt. X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 X 100 Xl0,000 (lbf) fracture (Length Method) HRC Quench Temper "' Min. · Max. Min. . I I I I I I I I I I 5 30 Min. Max. Max . Spec. I 5 5 4 5 fart of Screw +!-0.0005 in. 25 -34 --800 Heat No. I 52 _ 60 40 50 _ __ -----30 I Part of Screw I GOOD I 32.! 1580 I 8511 B86811 I 311 26 I 861 11 I 12J 21 1 I 51 81 19 Mean/3 Pcs. - NUT LOT NO. I.2131 .. Hard,:iess Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Thread Accur:acy After 24 hr °F c0c> ~ Hardness X 1000° F Proof Load Q C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (HRC) HRB (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. 20 -· Min. Max. Max. (Bolt & Nut) Bolt ANSI B1.1 Class 2A Spec·. 24 -38 HRB 89 8085( --850 H~at No. 55 60 40 50 ---Nut ANSI B1.1 Class 2B Mean/Spcs. 28.6 -GOOD i562 -120~ S37566 44 22 71 10 31 19 19 11 WASHER LOT NO. J720 Fastener Tension ' IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition% Fastener Tension REMARKS Hardness (Q)_. C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (HRC) X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Max. Max. Min. Spec. (lbf.) 40950 Mean I 5 sets. 50686 Spec. 38 -45 • Heat No. ---· 40 50 ---. -. , Standard Mt;an/5 Pcs. 40.4 181985 50 26 65 9 10 ---Deviation 1824 .. . Material Used. for the Bolt, Nut and Washer were fyielted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. Chief of Quality Assurance Section We h:e·r'eby certify that· the material described has been manufactured and inspected ~atisfact6rily· with ·1:~e requirement of the above specification. . ~c:;:;~ Testing Engineers -San Di ego, Inc. Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 2/4/00 99-441 BLACKMORE LOT 98 1620 Faraday A venue Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 169 NIA CB983162 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH, PE Established 1946 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test rep01is, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 1/24/00-1/27/00. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (2) Testing Engineers • San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 921 I I [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-581 0 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of J__ Project Name &odmo.1<,t; -Lzr 9tf' TESDP~eci#_9_7_-~~·¾-J~---- Address /1/4.:ZO /=;t}£f)o/ All;t;;l C9r&£s/211~ Cli General/ Subcontractor &da/Ja11,9t.,_{oifli2 ~ (£~ Building Permit #C8f£ 1/~ ;J.. DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other _________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'LSAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --%=~ans~~ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecif&::;~F~/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi zes J(/£..U.,li=..d -IL. Struct Steel 1f /3 J __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi =z:solidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block Electrode Storage cf£l>--: --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --'9tee1 ttr~Jl.~z::2. __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --~-8. Bolts lt.1:.JS: --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking fJL/J/fo -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --Y Electrodes £7a/R' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --V Other ll~c.7'1lr)ck. -__ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --£ "!Lt-,!'(t242-1,g). __ Corrections completed __ :;:'%~~7!::r~~=:t;::::r;~~;~~P- ~=t:::;;~;t~:fz:tz::;due:;;:;,:! ~:;;7::;1;:;;~1:1; z~:::;::;}J;A> 14 Field Representative ~~ c:5;:7~ ....,,/ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME..___5?£/ffe"A /J f-Zr;t€'£ >' nnt Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE b~J/ t3-::;.4u-fl= S, /.J. OJ /.1c-if h-57 -ti CERT. No.!CtBd /t)/2 77/s~S's: DATE /-.21/·-0Q Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page_1_of _f_ San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name IJ/Ac/<moaE-_/c(Tf?' TESD Project# _,_C/_,_?--1/_,_'l.._,_1~/ ____ _ Address /tg rJ ~ &4 ~c4 {';4 General / Subcontractor &no< Coll5Tj u/) & < CatiSTj cSo,171i ll1JI /i)rlcA jy Building Permit # ______________ DSA # __________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN~TION ~HECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~lans&~~/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~~eci~tions3m:d __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes f):'~.,t;-r/ //struct Steel 1/;s 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon {PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block ___£_ Electrode Storagef;::fl}&~/,J}J_ 3 --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ---LL.steel • .a ~z ~ .a 10 __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --~tal Deckinq /lf//t? -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --ectrodes E<;; Ci :::i. 2. -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ =-~71:t::%:!:ZS::};1;::t:j~;::::~::!::Jt:;::t:z;__hiJ /,,o),9~ #.b>/J ,.:/4_:jl1Ec7?t3n llJ/J-.£7fJE"IP!dc/;r; ,?fiA ;& ttJLJld· 1111/Jl«flfESS IU"i"/2E: Field Representative # ___ 7-r-d--:r+~~~.,,._....,.----:----- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ·Su)/1£;1 tDoffr,ES -' ( Pnn C early) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~1 "~;tk,L/J.-=: DATE /-.27-oo FormU003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 2/4/00 99-441B BLACKMORE LOT 103 1535 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 170 NIA CB990520 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH, PE Established· 1946 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test repo1is, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 1/25/00-1/28/00. These rep01is cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (5) Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 (858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _f_ Project Name /j/19-Ctk/)21J;RC-loT/03 TESD Project# _q.,_q~-_q_,_· i/_,__,_.l/j ____ _ Address L£}~-,;::,;;,Vt-c/4# /J{l£i CM! qb/Jd; Cl/- General I Subcontractor lir-11c) Caaqz; 0.11 li)/J;-0;-c/c£, Cd/I.. c;-z: /Ile Building Permit# CIJ 9 Z 0<$",2(2 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION Concrete __ Prestress Cone __ Masonry ~ Struct Steel:tf/,3 7 __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving Non-Destructive __ Batch Plant __ Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA --OSHPD __ specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ Asphalt Concrete __ Concrete Cylinders __ Cone Flex Beams __ Reinf. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar Samples __ Grout Samples __ Masonry Prisms __ Masonry Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other ___ _ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Cone: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Rini: Rebar ____ _ __ Rinf: W.W.F. ____ _ __ Rini: Tendons ____ _ __ Grout: Mix #/psi ___ _ __ Mortar: Type/psi ___ _ __ Units: Block ____ _ Units: Block ____ _ ~Steel--,,~~'"..,_f'. ..... h,_· ___ _ H.S. Bolts _____ _ __ Metal Decking ___ _ // Electrodei:: E7al?'. __ Fireproofing __ ~-- Other ______ _ INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~lans • ·. ~ ~pecific~ons - __ Size$ /l£Wctde:t/ __Slump _____ _ __ Air Content ____ _ __ Temperature ____ _ __Unit Weight ____ _ ~onsolidation __ Electrode Storage~ __Torque Applied ___ _ __Load (Pounds) ___ _ __Thickness ____ _ __ Corrective action required __ _ __Corrections completed __ _ Remarks. ZJh9J>Gcrj=d 1/ur l/1~7&Jj.,,9:7t(, {O and WE/c/i,ll ()'£ /(--SEteic:,s'Ibca:S' 6:nc/ 111- ~:1::;z:~t::c=1z::2s: ;J~'f:, ::::::/;;:;: ~t::~ 72mE---7'()01tm»//·oo 1vt1 -.lj~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME'-~~ r flp,./;£/j INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE 4:tJIAM 'A '/4//.,,w.,..- CERT. NO.---------- DATE /-.2.S-aa Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name ~1210&.E-/.r[t/O,? TESD Project# 99-J./L/i/j Address /s;fS-: m/44~ IJ-11~/ Cat&/-..gtz.&r:t; Clf General I Subcontractor MtJOc Oaavj ,J, IJ r !&iTffcR.t::-r Co MT Building Permit# Ctfs 99 o.,_5:,;z O DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix it/psi --~lans Ail!/~u~ --/s::~&~z __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix it/psi __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix it/psi ~truct Steer-#/37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rinf: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rinf: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix it/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~Asolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage ~ --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied Electrical --__ Masonry Prisms --_/L...Steel ll3{e __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~ Electrodes §7()18". -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed Remark~ :t;_5JIECtcef ;0/£ /4S7A&7lbl4 OE lc-sfU?/5...<. 0o i.s-z;s &0d tlf -;J'o 19/4c/MJ <: /JT/4«21£. c: -I·-;2 -3 -L/ ·-,':i" '>de..e c/4:0t;Js -r&11-l9/st2s-tJj>'ll?·-"?Jst)f. Zdrm>7ltiJ.- f ~ttf::~~ ~~=::J:;;:r:=-::::;;c;::;:;az:a M/(r: a;n£s: '2f' 19 r7A72&laJd#-AJ ~ Field Representative#~ ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,5, J), G /jt J iC§t..!>-7 INSPECTOR'S NAME(_ 97'EjJ-I/J5Rt jlljQ,££S CERT NO IC/?6/()/2 77/3-8'.S-(Pnnt Clearly) · · INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Jitf'jll!.fA1 >6 -~£. 4= DATE /-2. {a-C2 0 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of / ---- Project Name /?lat !<;non -Lo-T /0 3 TESD Project# _g,_9,_-_L./,__· if,_,.· /-=B"-· ___ _ Address l,-.3S ti}-(,(}£l-c~1;jf If V4-Clft&.sl:u&c/4 Cd General/ Subcontractor tkt10,Col1S7j ,LJ. #. t{),d;'Zl7t:;;;{Jt[, Co(l)SI Building Permit #(1/3 990.£520 DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN:,:TIO~ C~E~KLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --Plans & "t;t:../l.i ~J __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecifications~tT/// ~asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi · Sizes 1/£.£. i 1 ~ true! Steel "11/37 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon {PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~onsolidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode StoragefkR-!l/Jt/l)i. --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ . _ Masonry Prisms --y"'Steel fl. i "t ~~2. 7 ~S. t,0 __ Load {Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__ H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~lectrodes E{tJ/f: -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --/ Other £h.:c1'12,,d£.. -__ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --.a;_·z;~,23.;i)_ __ Corrections completed CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, . specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. ,S .. /), C<1j J1c-# t!J-7 I 1NsPEcToR·s NAME S7Er11#;z /1 Eio l!&s • (Print Clearly) CERT. NO. /ceo-#;{J ::z 77 /.3-&.~- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ JJ~ DATE l-c:27-aa Fonn#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 Page_1_of_L San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Project Name ;l:jf)C/(;1:Jaf>E ·' l->7/0. 3 TESD Project # -19 ....... 9'----;f-· ¾.,._,l/3...,._ ____ _ Address /)US M:Mc/Ajt f)111;1 CIJl</4</;A~ CIJ General/ Subcontractor ,/le,mJ, c'.h.1>7; ;!}.It, {/),/z)&aiE. CW»L,;· c >01;7d~C(k-Lc/;t,~ Building Permit #M f9as ,£ 0 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other __________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ cone: Mix #/psi --/ Plans &/!!LU)~ cl __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ cone: Mix #/psi ~Specift£tions /2'£f1flLJEJ · Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes -¥i!lt::LI.L£d --;;:-7 Struct Steel:tf/J7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi -;7" Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block _/L__ Electrode Storage'~~• 'I Mechanical __ Grout Samples --Units: Block __ Torque Applied -- :Zsteel &·i~ ,-a ia Q --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__ Load (Pounds) ,/ 7 __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block --__/c;.._H.S. Bolts /f.,l:>0,5:" __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --Z Electrodes Ezat8> E7i-Z:8' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative # ZdJ (j CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME07¥J'°~,1 'l!/JaAE S (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE d-ti-#4t t -u~ ,5, /(). e11j /.1c-#ts7 CERT. No/CA o#' 1M ZZ/3-85' DATE /-,.2g'--00 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92111 Project: &lfcfmaAe ~Ln7'/tJ3 ~LDREPORT NOTICE TO COMPLY Page e<. of 2,, Date Job Number -.2J'-oo Permit Number Form#001 SET L:Ol NO. W8091 G ~pecification ASTM A325 Type 1 -93" · ASTM A 563 Grade DH· XX. -93 ASTM F436 Type 1. XX ·.;..,93 BOLT LOT NO. 1.../ C)I-.:> INSPECTION CERTIFICATE Size Quantity 3/4-10 UNC X 3-3/4 9,589 pcs. . 71-3//f I IS ·· /IJ)Lfr,.(~fun'LtYu__A.Jh--{_ t ,.., ~> C/199oS.2.o-/535 ·=/w~ /JVJL ~~ Cir * UNYTITE, INC. II;, One Unytite Drive Peru, Illinois 613 54 815-224-2221 -FAX# 815-224-3434 Date: Oct :16, I 98 Mecha!'lka) Pro p~rty of Fu II Size Bolts I Heat Treatment l1-'-D_EN_T--'1_'-F1_c_A_Tl_o_N--11---r---,---~---.-----.-'---..----.-- Tensile Strength Chemical Composition % Proof load Load Position of 28400ibt. (lbf) fracture (length Method) Min. Max. Spec. Part of Screw +/-0.0005 in. . Mean/3 Pcs. Part of Screw I GOOD NUT LOT NO. I0482 .. Hardness I °F (°C) HRC I Quench I Temper 25 -34 32. 'i 1580 Min. 800 851 0 ~ "' ~ Heat No. A61284 C Si X 100 X 100 30 52 -- 31 25 Mn p s Cu Ni Cr Mo 8 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 X 100 x10,000 Min. Max. Max. 5 60 40 50 --------30 82 11 13 2 1 6 1 15 Hardness Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Thread Accuracy .· After 24 hr °F (°C) ~ Hardness x 1000° F Proof Load Q C Si Mn (HRC) HR8 (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. 20 Min. -Spec .. 24 _. 38 HRB 89 t:;Rll.t:;O --850 He;at No. 55 60 -Mean/5pcs. 30 .1 GOOD 1562 1220 S32056 44 21 69 WASHER LOT NO. ,1649 ' Chemical Composition % IDENTIFICATION Hardness C Si Mn p s Cu Ni ~HRC} © X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 .. . . Max . Max. . . Heat No. . Spec. 38-·45 . ---40 50 --. . . ., Mean/5 Pcs. 40.4 <P.75385 52 17 62 12 ~ 1 --. ·-Material,Usea for-the Bolt, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. We hereby·_ certify tl;)at th; material described has. been manufactured and inspected --a!:.t __ 11. _ _:1 ..... ..:a.t.: .. L .... _.,..._ •• :_.,... ___ .. _, .. 1--._ -,,hr.."n i:-norifir-::Jif-inn -- - p s Cu Ni Cr (Bolt & Nut) - X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Bolt ANSI 81.1 Max .. Max. Class 2A 40 50 -----Nut ANSI 81.1 Class 28 8 31 23 12 8 Fastener Tension Fastener Tension REMARKS Min. Cr Spec. X 100 (lbf.) ?Q4.nn Mean I 5 sets. 33646 - ? Standard -Deviation 1704 JU o;;ty JJI:ction --.Jc) 0.:s _,. 77·-1-t'tl D. -t!J~c-l~uJ-'u-J._o=C Io ,5> SET LOT NO. X0021 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE UNYTITE, INC. . Specification Size Quantity . .. ASTM A325 Type 1 --Y ,j : ASTM A 563 Grade DH .XX -93 7/8-9 UNC X 5-1/2 ASTM F436 Type 1 . XX. -:-93 2,000 pcs. Ci One Unytite Drive Peru, Illinois 61354 815-224-2221 -FAX# 815-224-3434 ..... BOLT LOT NO ... x'0.O·2·3 Date: Oct 29. '98 . . . ·Mecha·njcal Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Com position % Tensile Strength Proof Load Hardness °F <°C) 0 l l l · c M B . . . 3 2 5 C Si Mn P S Cu N1 r o load Position of 9 01bf. l-'-----..------1 c{ x 100 x 100 x 100 x 1 000 x 1000 x 100 I x 100 I x 100 I x 100 Ix 10,000 (lbf) fracture (Length Method) H RC Quench Temper 0 Min. Max. Min. l 30 I I Min. I Max. I Max. I I I l I 5 Spec. I · 5 5 4 5 '"""°"~ +I-o.ooos h 25 • 34 _ 800 H,at No. I 52 _ 60 40 so .. .. •. 3 0 M,an/3Pcs .• 7103J"""'5=wl GOOD I 33.$ 1580 I 8511 A62611 I 31 I 24 I 831 11 I 121 5 I 2 I SI 11 17 NUT LOT NO. I0371 . Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % · ·. Hardness Thread Accur_acy · After 24 hr °F (°C) J1o'1 Hardness X 1000° F Proof load C Si Mn (HRC) HRB (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. ~ 20 Min. -Spec. . ~4 -38 HRB 89 80850 -850 H~at No . 55 60 Mean/5pcs. -GOOD 1562 27.5 1058 B67357 44 21 74 WASHE~ LOT NO. J616 IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition% ' Hardness .c Si Mn p s Cu Ni ··(HRC) ©J X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 Max. Max. .. Spec. · 38 -45 Heat No. ----40 50 - Mean/5 P<is:j . -· ·, 40. 2 :B31722 51 20 71 15 15 - Materia.l U:;,ed for_ the Bol(, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. ·w~ hereby ce·rtify that tlie material described has been manufactured and inspected sati-sfadb!ily yv-ith l_he requirement of the above specification. . . . .,, .. -- - p s Cu Ni Cr (Bolt & Nut) X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Bolt ANSI 81 .1 Max. Max. Class 2A 40 50 ------Nut ANSI B1.l Class 28 8 18 1 1 6 Fastener Tension Fastener Tension REMARKS Min. Cr Spec. X 100 (lbf.) 40950 Mean / 5 sets. 49646 -- Standard -Deviation 1640 ·et of Quality A surance Section L -.Joo-~· 77-11-f / jj ~ U-J..A..U-Yr-1v•·L-1Y~-,1-.a, 1 v..,, SET ,LOT NO. X4821 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE Specification· Size Quantity ASTM A325 Type 1 '::I~ ASTM A 563 Grade DH _xx -93· 7/8-9 UNC X 2-1/4 ASTM F436 Type 1 ·. XX -:--93 32,815 pcs . • UNYTITE, INC. One Unytite Drive Peru, Illinois 61354 815-224-2221 -FAX# 815-224-3434 BOLT LOT NO.. x~ei1 Date:. Se:Q.22 1 '99 Mecti_an:ical Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION I Chemical Composition % Tensile ·strength Proof Load Hardness OF (OC) 0 I C I s; I Mn I P I s I Cu I N; I c, I Mo / B Load Position of 3925qbf. X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1 000 X 1000 X 1 00 X 100 X 1 00 X 1 00 X 10,000 (lbf) fracture (Length Method) HRC Quench Temper Min. · Max .. Min. . 5 30 Min. Max. Max. . Spec. I 5545 jart of Screw +!-0.0005 in. 25 -34 --800 Heat No. 52 -60 40 50 ------30 Mean/3 Pcs. I -Part of Screw GOOD 32.' 1580 851 B86811 31 26 86 1 1 1 ~ 2 1 5 8 19 NUT LOT NO. I.2131 .. Hardi:tess Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Thread Accur_acy After 24 hr °ॡF (°C) ~ Hardness X 1000° F . Proof load QI C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (HRC) HRB (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. 20 ... Min. Max. Max. (Bolt & Nut) Bolt ANSI B1.1 Class 2A -Spec. 24 -38 HRB 89 8085( -850 H~at No. 55 60 40 50 ---Nut ANSI 81.1 Class 2B Mean/5pcs. 28.6 -GOOD i562 · 120: S37566 44 22 71 10 31 19 19 11 WASHER LOT NO. J720 Fastener Tension ' IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition% Fastener Tension REMARKS Hardness (Q)_. C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (HRC) X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 x 10Q0 X 100 X 100 X 100 Max. Max. Min. Spec. (lbf.) 40950 Mean / 5 sets. 50686 Spec. J8 -45. Heat No. ---· 40 50 ----.. ~ . Standard M1:an/5 Pcs. 40.4 181985 50 26 65 9 10 ---Deviation 1824 .. . Material Used. for the Bolt, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. . We h'.ereby certify that· the material described h~s been manufactured and inspected ~atisfact6rily 0 with't~e requirement of the above specification. . Chief of Quality Assurance Section ~~ . \) ol!::,--'rr 11-'-/ I// /B .--/Q)b::u:,P.,.;;-YLIJ-'l-l. ·-/...01·-10 ~ ! ' . . . . X6701.G SET LOT NO. _______ _ INSPECTION CERTI_FICATE l . • -~ UNYTITE, INC. Specification ASTM A325 Type 1 --:, .j A_STMA 563 Grade DH _xx -93 ASTM F436 Type_1_ XX ... -~3 · BOLT LOT NO. :x°6id{· . Size 7/8-9 UNC! X 2 · Mecha:nical Property of F.ull Size Bolts Heat Treatment Tensile Strength Proof Load I Hardness °F (°C) oa 0sItIon o : . L d I P . . . t 3 9 2 s 01bt (lbf) fracture {Length Method) I · H RC I Quench I Temper Min. Max. Spec. _i:; 5 45 tl}'art of Screw I +/-0.0005 in I 25 -34 Mean/3 Pcs. Part of Screwl GOOD 31.3 1580· NUT LOT NO. 12841 fy\in. 800 851 Quantity. 18,025 pcs . IDENTIFICATION C X 100 30 Heat No. 52 A81630 31 One Wnytite .Drive Peru, Illinois 61354 815-224-2i21 :_ F_AX # 815-224-3434 Date:-.. Nov. 15, '99 Chemical Composition % Si Mn p S Cu I Ni 1 · Cr I Mo I B X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1 00 X 10,000 Min. Max. Max. 5 -60 40 50 --30 24 84 8 13 8 1 7 9 17 ·Hardness Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Comppsition % Thread Accu~acy After 24· hr °F c0c> ~-Hardness X 1000° F Proof Load Q C Si Mn (HRC) HRB (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. 20 Min. -~pee .. · 24 -38 HRB 89 80850 -850 H~at No. 55 60 Mean/5pcs. -GOOD 1562 28. 1 · 1202 S37566 44 22 71 WASHER.LOT NO. J705 ' IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % 1-larpness t Si Mn p s Cu Ni (HRC) (Q), X 100 X 100 X 100• X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 • Max. Max. Spec. 38. -45. Heat No. . ---40 50 -.. -· . .• . , •. · ·Mean/5 Pcs. ·187531 47 38 62 6 3 42.2 -, , . Ma_terrar Used f~r the Bolt, .Nut and Washer were M~lted & Manufactured in the U.SA We: .heteby certify. that the material described has been manufactured and inspected sa_tisfact9ri.ly .with th~ requirement of the above specification. - . i p s! Cu Ni Cr (Bolt & Nut) X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Bolt ANSI 81.1 Max. Max. Class 2A 40 50 ---Nut ANSI B1.1 Class 2B 10 31 19 19 11 Fastener Tension Fastener Tension REMARKS Min. Cr Spec. X 100 ((bf.) 40950 Mean I 5 sets. 49992 - -Standard Deviation 2244 · Crief of Quality Assurance Section ~~A ./" r ·.: :·,:.~,,.,,,-. ·# . -;/',;. -, ._;,;.;'.? X6931 G INSPECTION CERTIFICATE ··'.!?_·====------. ·: ·:_:j··.·--Specification Size , Quantity ~ · . UNYTITE, INC . . P.eru, lllil'lois 61354 ,,_",,--"' ,-"'STM A325 Type 1 -~ .1 I ASTM A 563 Grade DH XX -93 I ASTM F436 Type 1 . XX -93 3/ 4-10 UNC X 2 . 32., 785 pcs. '=' One Upytite Driv.e · .. 815-224-2221 -FAX H 815-224-3434 ' . .- BOLT LOT NO. X6931 Date: ... NOY,22,'99 Mechanical Property of Full Size Bolts Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Tensile Strength Proof Load· Hardness OF (OC) 0 c s; Mn P s c"IN;,c,IMOI' Load Position of 2a·4oqbt. . X 100 X ~00 X 100 ~ 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 X 100 Xl0,000 (lbf) fracture (Length Method) HRC Quench Temper ~ Min. Max. Min. I 30 I . I Min. I Max. I Max. I I I I I 5 Spec. I t:1.111 n fart of Screw +/-0.0005 In. 25 -34 --800 Heat No. I 52 _.. 60 40 50 _ --· _ : ·__ · 30 Mean/3 Pcs. I 4800 fart of Screw! GOOD I 31. i 1580 I 8421 B87218 I 301 24 I 851 11 I 111 21 1 I· 41 1 I 23 NUT LOT NO. _12915 Hardness Heat Treatment IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition % Thread Accuracy .. After 24 hr OF (OC) (Q) Hardness X 1000° F Proof Load C Si Mn p s Cu Ni Cr (HRC) HRB (Lbf) Quench Temper X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 X 100 Min. Min. 20 Min. Max. Max. - (Bolt & Nut) Bolt ANSI 81.1 Class 2A HElat No. Spec. 24 -38 HRB 89 58450 -850 55 60 40 50 ---Nut ANSI 81.1 ,. Class 28 Mean/5pcs. -GOOD 1562 126! S36687 44 22 70 12 32 25 13 13 26.7 WASHER LOT NO. J730 IDENTIFICATION Chemical Composition% Hardness C Si Mn p s Cu Ni (HRC) © X 100 X 100 X 100 X 1000 X 1000 X 100 X 100 Max. Max. Spec. 38 -45 · Heat No. -----40 50 -- Mean/5 Pcs. 40.6 298632 49 44 62 11 5 -. Materia·l Used for the Bolt, Nut and Washer were Melted & Manufactured in the U.S.A. We hereby certify that the material described has been manufactured and inspected satisfactorily with the requirement of the above specification. - - Fastener Tension Fastener Tension REMARKS Min. Cr Spec. ·.· X 100 (lbf.) 29400 ' . ... .. Mean I 5 sets. 36158 -- Standard -Deviation t~29 Chief of Quality Assurance Sectiori ~~~ 7 ,. Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of__L Project Name &!tci:&J()/J.L ~,!a7,9tf' TESD Project# ~9_9-_/j,_J.j_,,_./,,____ ___ _ Address /?20 Ui<Acl,yt /Jl/cy 01)/4,{5 /J11o4 Cl/-: General I Subcontractor /J;:=-J1,[J , UJ1_,,g;7~; ,L},, /). /i)/J;j/4.~F: ,. {?011><:·7 Building Permit# QR 9£,S /t; :2 DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# _______________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ---t.---"p1ans &_w..:U., !_;-,..:/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi t.-/" Specifications/27$.E a?/2:/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Sizes &¥Le It, JJ':ctf_ ~true! Steel 1f/JJ __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rinf: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rinf: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rinf: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block ~ectrode Storage ·iJd'.4<= --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --~Steel /ts:, __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~ Electrodes .e'7t> I fr>: -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing ---IL. Other~c:xif. __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --iDP-'!ULll:2.~ 1c2) __ Corrections completed 1/$l)s--lf/$1].S,~-1 IJ-r,bnF½ -8-1.:Tu 9~ht-jt1£rro;L'l/2e &=ajl &tui (l)EI~ o:fC I(- . /') L' I/ /, /f , U /I ,/ • · (~§'. 001'@ /() '9.36 S?)t£L-drKleMiti(CfE/}°$-'-S::-X,f}&:JX'7'$' /11~_«2 '?AF /ll~J;iL.sr rJkl?cleA '7cjll {}~()&'~~, /JE:4 Y/&,wl 5 --:.:S--Lj ~/.,V! ci; LI/Sll5; t1-rLau: g -/J:11B.-I 'i:it 'I/ · I-Ji--/5 -9To<-~· (J)O&I< l,S <mil l/1 /JR°rf'IR.,SS &7 7/215 ·72,m.c-J Field Representative # ~ ~,-.,c:> C,11v..f.rA-c--1:}) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME.,_ )/ tjillen JJ El(J l<E <; ' (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ~ '::/~Ll-= S,. /J. C i:J) le-<# &0-7 CERT. No./Cid o41~/oa?7713-&-<.s- DATE / ··<s -a() Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name &4cLOZa&E ·-Lo z: f P--TESDP~ect#_9_9_-~~~~~/ ____ _ Address / 4 :? O .~c~ /J{l-!-:1 C-td<Mc~ C/1 General / Subcontractor /lu1C , (l,·12 70 /) /l, {1)/;/0t cY2E , LiJ ol si..z- Building Permit#C8 9& ?/6' f2 DSA# _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --/ Plans &i!L~tLU.t/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecification~,i~k'/£tt/&I __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi izes tf}..tL£:..a11=f,L ~ Struct Steel . .:# /3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block V Electrode Storage.~ --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --~Steel 12 y ~ __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S.Bolts --t/' Electrodes E Z&£' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing -----1.L_ Other E,/.£(.''°7',? &:/E __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --_EZLt..-£:tL}li!.al 2~ __ Corrections completed __ £lie '!JodEs fa/<.. l'llirT lf.)£M "49 fi <J ~~77Ei icl uJ1.:LJE" ~d CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME\ }1.13j-2!l& ,fJ E/11 IJE s: (Pnnl Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥1 >4au /4--c ,S. tfJ. c1~ )1c·-'llb-s7 CERT. No. ICIJ d-7(_ la i9 77AJ -?J- DATE /-J--Q 0 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _l__ Project Name 8};;.c/<m111<E··loT ,9k TESD Project# _9_,_9_ .. -1-J/4-1/1,_' ---- Address / l-,2tJ l/Jir1J:o/1f 12½ [f('}/d.~/wr4 CA General / Subcontractor ffe,;1;,;., {!o/J,if; {J. IJ, {L/IJ) U9 oQ F , fh #, >T Building Permit #/'.Jj 98,.51/6 :2. DSA# ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IN~CTION CHt=CKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~Jans tf'£.VJtI.tf.}l;;,L __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi Specification,,,/l;::V/i:1/} eJ j/2asonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi :=2'sizes ll£.-i(iEl{Ji:,l_ Struct Steel-# /.JJ __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block ~ Electrode Storage, p /2.d.c: Mechanical __ Grout Samples Units: Block ---- ;?;teel ,d 1 ~ __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --~ectrodes c7tVk -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --_LL Other -EL-c.cm().c.k __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ other --eZl.°1-K-(.ilt2rf?.. 2.:2) __ Corrections completed ___ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work,· unless otherwise_ stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and -:/"I specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. 0, I), cy /_ IC -0,57 INSPECTOR'S NAME ,S;?l;""y#£'1!,1 jJ /JM £ £ , (Print Clearly) CERT. No/cAd-102 zz 13-~s INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~i./J.-= Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_ Project Name .J5iBc'ktr)c,1,&£ -/.e-Z: 9g--TESD Project # _9,_9.,_· ·_~ J..+-1/£-1-1/'--------- Address /6' d2d /5vJtcJ~,/Jt;1=y CAA¼s~ C/1 General I Subcontractor £10 , CM,;;-7; ,!:c A /L0/faCtf!E, CM5 T ;V Building Permit #C/3 9g f/2;",;l, DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~lans lfklll0//£d __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecifications_(?;::II/Plll6,/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi zes~/,Q£ef Vstruct Steel.#' /,.J 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~onsolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage,~ __ Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --V""steel /lf.(, __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --Y Electrodes E7<Jlfl' -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --__L Other Eb£.c.·tll.o c/4: __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --~t.(Zl/lrD(l..~ __ Corrections completed __ ? __ t-. ,, v,r /.. -· -~-...,J. .J. .. Dt -.i~ /.(-~S£/J./Es. ~ l.ll-Jc;isr-s1 J .5 {!r:r111j)/.£-tt:. PT~).£ 7;!iJE£c CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME ,}7£/11/&4 /J H1J1</(5 • (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ yf ~_k.1_ 11..c DATE/-&-co Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L_ Project Name r1/4ci122t1,RE-ld9'f': TESD Project # _,9_,_f_-____.f_,_51._,_· I_· ____ _ Address Ira ,JO ~c/1}--dttlE; U1-/<M/2&4 a General I Subcontractor Jjf:flc). {}2d-5Yi 1-ju/.({?cUJSZ: Ca Building Permit# (}If t/R:?16 ,2_ DSA # _________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~Concrete# /6£ · __ $oil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --2:.ns &V/~~6 __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecif~km; =~Ji/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Sizes 'F{(/£Ul.!:::,L __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --_k_steel 4.ra7 __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --_tL ather<.2/1~ Sa el. --'-~k r-__ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --/-IS, t;111Jfj--Cl3a~!f £, ~~ ,zc;_ __ Corrections completed Remark~ hy6c416--h4 I/J.,@l/111iw 0E1JS07-~1'/J//Mlr1l-:t2 x/1/Lo/la :zi¥Act½:l&c/4 =fu~t..~~~!:'tt~~o~~~:;;~~~r IJ~lltjl.&s~/&~ &:2cl4 t!flcuzc.Ma<:/2" !Jpci111:/~1fc2A,,,v1--;,;; /if ~oa>t1121 Zo~ ¥1x;,~ ~~:::::;;;c;:::;Jt;t:;;~£~ /z/hrf dat12r/ 112~ tW;J Field Representative# ~~ ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME "S:ziyJIIM /J Do/<.£ 5'. . (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE :l-tzfiJLzd ~,/~ ,5-: ~ " CJ') ic-71 £,__57 CERT. No./C/?c>#/(J o2 L 7/3-21 DATE/-7-00 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 78~5 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name IJ,.{odma&E -Jar ff" TESD Project# --+-9...L.9_-...L..f_,_//._,_I ____ _ Address /4:,20 &t'Adfj /l:11£1 C;:JR,ic:../2~ CA: General/ Subcontractor &JJ-(1 .trtoif1 ~ft)I} 5 11/4::lrbJw Building Permit #1?(3 983/ to?-.-D§A # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract# Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --;;;.'21ans &v~tz t.tl.~ ~L __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi pecificati;s &!(Lt /J.! 1:,.J Masonry __ Subgrad,e --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ?sizes/r.E 1//E. U.! Er;/_. ~ Struct Steel::///3 7 __ Asphalt Concrete --V R'.nl: Rebar IJ 7d 4JI< 6 0 __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation __ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block _L'Electrode Storage ,~,t --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --_Lstee1 Ar? __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H,S. Bolts ----1L. Electrodes Ez1--r:-fl: -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Remarks Zns,vJrcrulzk bZ-u) /lf/clt[JFiJ/4,;;z OLJJo 0-rJ24ck6(} _#61-#7fk;irfo1<ci11,'>2Ed C/;tJ/l.cl,Mtls· -zo /J3r, S7j:£}-ll4;l1-: dxr/k&1 jJ.U.olrm/ls---.,jsLJ;;_-&,Ls:-x-1;2-1-Jj.si).;),-Lfso2. &T fe-rzt:is -!f'.1: 't -'Z·6 8".-JcfJ t;-r,i,·6S-f-c€:--<r t .l./-eZ--6-3 -Lt~-1 -t ~ L--dot::u-19 <f do -/7-i 1F?- 1-s--1r1ra -LC:: ir It/ -II ri I 4. -f:il-t 13 -JC/t:fJ-/!, r r • CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSP~CTOR'S NAME,->?q4#K4 d/1oRE:S' {Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE JtzJA./,,,1 ~ ~.,.__. $./).Ci~ /.1c~ ~-7 CERT. No/CBct1>a.2 7 7/J-ffS- DATE /D2-;;z7-C/f Forrn#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 78~5 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name /5b-JcK!J1o,RJ£-/.rrz: C/Jt: TESD Project# -9-1--1-9--~//,,__,~'-I-·/ ____ _ Address lt20 6/-R1tc-0f l)11c:1 L//1</S~-CA General I Subcontractor /k110 {!tJfJ.:{Li;, sJ:{ds tfJtdc/Jhfj Building Permit #C/3 C/8',YI C ;L rftA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --Concrete __ $oil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --v-Plans kr /.0.b-L __ Prestress Cone __ Base __ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ecifications 1FJ/'/?.fJ1f::' J -- __ Masonry __ Subgrade __ Cone: Mix #/psi Sizf'" &J/IOIZW -- --1.L., $true! Steerl// 3 t __ Asphalt Concrete ~Rini: Rebar /J zot,, <j/U 0 __ Slump -- __ Rini: W.W.F. v' __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams ----Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --Units: Block ~lectrode Storage r~ ---- --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ---t.L-Steel ,&, i_(;;, __ Load (Pounds) -- __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --V Electrodes E 7/ Z: X: -- --DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. S. ,() .. C 1, J.1c _# 6--5 7 1NsPEcToR·s NAME S79411u I! &2/2 Es" (Pnnt Clearly) CERT. No.lCJ?,a~/6:J 77 /3-8S- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ /:1 ~/4/1.c:c DATE /cJ. -:29-9<'/ Form#003 M liMilSSW fdiWiMW &\P9f?:AWW21 !Pt4/MmlM¾iitiitiWiRt\Wtti! ri3%tViU? 255M Fa+? M dB# 9§¾5MB9 @M W §#Ui4 k S i1B4 llf fi/CI Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 12/21/99 99-441B BLACKMORE LOT 103 1620 Faraday Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 2728 NIA CB990520 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH, PE Established I 946 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 12/14/99-12/17/99. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed ( 4) Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 (858] 715-5800 Fax (858] 715-581 0 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 78~5 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name iibJc/<:tiJc:;/2 £ -Lo-Clo 3 Address /I.f's.£ t'l)/?A~f-)v~OM/s/,&4 Clf TESDP~eci#~2-1~--£_f-/_B ____ _ General I Subcontractor $AcJ. C'o41z:col 1/4&: CM.:Z.Ca1 Cl~,.57EEL oo,e1&17a,e <::. /Ac; Building Permit# Cf! 990.S.2 o DSA # __________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~oncretefrctf'lhl/4'!:J, SrcE/_ __ soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --t01ans tf£.k.Zlf.Ul.Ed 11/SJ ~,,lo3 __ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Specifications /EVIE((,/£-# __ Prestress Cone --Base -- __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~izes dEvt.,n J.2.l;'rd._ __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --_/L_ Rini: Rebar ,J4fl?JI< t: 0 __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- --DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing --/ Other /J(i.s;!.£ fO __ Corrective action required __ --Specialty __ Other --4.Zo&~(..o __ Corrections completed __ ~ Field Representative#~ ~ .2 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME0.~4 '/(f2a,tES (Print Clearly} CERT. No/CBa#:../o:J77/3-t?f" INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ fl ~4-DATE 12-/1..f~ C/9 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 789_5 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name 8/,Ac/<.,/}Jof2E -Lorio 3 TESD Project# ~9-f_-_/j.~Aj~/~B~---- Address /S:,5-,5": ~ IJ!l:1 C/J.RJ.-s.fJAc~ C/f General I Subcontractor .....,./ik........,.a-<2 ....... ~='d,-~=57,,,__._,.l_,'t:J"--,1~d~<6=--k_,__~f'a ..... 12=·-~,_,_..{r ....... · ....,..l/,-tl:,-i~f)'-5'--S'"2£~-F-L~e&~ .... 6-£~Lc-'IJ.,..,7a~t<~<~«-l~iz~c--___ _ Building Permit #_._C,.... B..L-.4-9-1-Cf...::6:;..:,S:,._.;l,"""-'-Q~-------DSA # _________________ _ Plan File# OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST --t,L Concrete /l£j,J ftJl!,c;h(j'!/71:d --Soil __ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ Plans & /t_/e:i,.t.!£.c/ 4f/03 ---- Y Speci~tion" fkll/EtoEJ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Masonry __ subgrade --Cone: Mix #/psi .../4::::_Sizes &.fLirt.1 ;_cc/ __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --~Rini: Rebar IJ~ts; /1 Zo {, __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Reinf. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ . Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reporte_d work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code . .$, j), C?l/f J_ Jc_ INSPECTOR'S NAME SJE:JI/Er! j) tit2R£ $ (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ¥a i1::£~ DATE /,2-/~-99 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name /3i.&cl::tl2o&E -Lo 7 ltJ 3 . TESD Project # 9 7-lfl//{3 Address /S3S: :fMtJc/1f IJ:114 C//d!;/J;d,, {'A General/ Subcontractor IJ.EJJfJ, f!M'Ir; /h-l (haq: Building Permit# {?/j 9905:o? Q DSA # ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~ Concrete 1f-/o I __ $oil --~Cone: Mix #/psi J; OOQ]ls_i /Plans &_11 ia.t.J6:/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~ Specif&~ons./2' f::'IJZt:' Ii' 1 J:', / __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi /sizes C:.'t/.E.t.J.l,t:".,-j_ __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar _IC_s1ump 1'' -/l)(i_A;_ __ Fireproofing ~ Concrete Cylinders _£_ __ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~Consolidation •1fl£-4= --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H,S.Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required __ Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed ___ Remarks bJ.'ilJFcrd lbc: LliN:-c()1Ei!T 1Md (k(JSoL/clA:Tion oE 8:2, euluc V#l-12,d~ or ~000 r<£t. l /t / C60CRETE1 i5fnm.Bcaac/icla &1t:'# /J1lrfhfJC/20E-£//x /)a • .,:trS~ 1trjL~t1;;-J..s-9-10-11-1c2- JS-li/-l0-, /tl)oUJT..,5=-?iAs/2 Eoci"su11;:; 1J12:.;1fi.5 .JJa dJ:.:·T1-J/l-~/;Js:2"' Field Representative~ :;;-.;£2 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. .S. /J. {}ll}' )1c-* 657 CERT. No./03cJ71/o.2 '7713-8'8 ' INSPECTOR'S NAME \.27117-11.ca t Ile~ ES • (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~J-2 p~.f.&:-DATE /2-/7-99 Fonn#003 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY• RAHWAY• FT. LAUDERDALE• ORLANDO• SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT BLACKMORE-LOT 98 PROJECT NO. 99-441 --------------- PROJECT ADDRESS 1620 FARADAY, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR RENO CONSTRUCTION ------------------------------ ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER SMITH CONSULTING/ HOROWITZ & TAYLOR BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 983162 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUTD PRISMS D OTHER PLACEMENT DA TE 11/23/99 . DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 11/24/99 SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK W/POZZ, 3000 PSI TYPE OF CEMENT C-150, TYPE 11/V TICKET NO. 262442 ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N SLUMP SPECIFIED N/A SLUMP 5.00" MIXING TIME CONCRETE TE.MP.. DESIGN STRENGTH .(f '.c} P.SI ' .. , LOCATION OF PLACEMENT - 59 PERCENT AIR ---64 AIR TEMP. 3000.@ .2& DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY PANEL# 8 LABORATORY DATA NIA __ 68_ $.P.FLORES AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH 6 31410 11/29/99 6X12 28.27 73,000 2580 7 31411 11/30/99 6X12 28.27 84,000 2970 28 31412 12/2.1/99 6X12 28.27 102,500 3630 28 31413 12/21/99 6X12 28.27 113,000 4000 H 31414 1/18/00 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. CtJECK.ED BY: ' .. :.. .... ::..:: ,__.,' ' •• _1 ,'.J ; •. . . . . . ~ ' .. •. •:'. STS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS . (?-~ REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, .RCE 56018 . . ·, DATE: ,1 .. _\-z,.1\~. I (psi) TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 ATLANTIC CITY• RAHWAY• FT. LAUDERDALE • ORLANDO • SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT BLACKMORE-LOT 98 PROJECT NO. 99-441 PROJECT ADDRESS 1620 FARADAY, CARLSBAD CONTRACTOR RENO CONSTRUCTION ..:.......:::::..:....:....:___:_...:._:__:c..:....c..c___:____:____:_ _____________________ _ ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER SMITH CONSULTING/ HOROWITZ & TAYLOR BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 983162 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF IE] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D HS GROUTD PRISMS D OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 11/23/99 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 11/24/99 -------------- SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 ---------------------------- MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK W/POZZ, 3000 PSI TYPE OF CEMENT C-150, TYPE 11/V TICKET NO. 262452 -------------- ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N SLUMP SPECIFIED ------------ MIXING TIME CONCRETE TEMP. DESIGN STRENGTH (f '0) PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT 46 PERCENT AIR 65 AIR TEMP: 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY PANEL#25 LABORATORY DATA NIA SLUMP 3.50" NIA 70 S.P. FLORES AGE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (DAYS) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (lbs) STRENGTH (psi) 6 31415 11/29/99 6X12 28.27 71,000 2510 7 31416 11/30/99 6X12 28.27 77,500 2740 28 31417 12/21/99 6X12 28.27 106,500 377_0 28 31418 12/21/99 6X12 28.27 108,000 3820 H 31419 1/18/00 DISC ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. •ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. CHECKED BY: arf -~.,>' REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: DATE: <76.,,.~ov, ' Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/_ Project Name {jJ1jc):moll£--Lt11 lo3 TESD Project # -----'-C/_,_9_--L..1./__,__,'I I.___..B..L..--. ___ _ Address /S:f',,t;HJR1td1:j 1t:v4. {]lt&Js/Jsf4 CEL General/ Subcontractor J}::J&) (1.Jf/SLCO / d--t K Coo.s7, CcJ Building Permit# C/3 99 (2-S,:,ZC) DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~ncrete __ Soil --~one: Mix #/psi .:s;-oOQ& ~~ns&we:aJ£J __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ Specil~tion~.CJI/ e/JJ Ed __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~izes _l;._/f/£' ct JEd __ Struct Steel _. __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar _Lslump i /I rJ.-L I( __ Fireproofing ~ Concrete Cylinders JD__ __ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature __ Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi ~solidationr --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Ster~ --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block _· __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- --OSHPD __ Roofing ----Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative #~.f1!--: C,;tLI#~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the aprir-ns &.1, ... specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. S. J). C l'"{j ); C -# ?$ 7 INSPECTOR'S NAME s.27¥1±4 11 fioaE_r • (Print Clearly) CERT. NO./Ci?c> '7f lo::Z7713-8'.k INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~(d/ t ~~ ?t5¥rn Testing Engineers-San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: 12/2/99 99-441 BLACKMORE LOT 98 1535 Faraday Carlsbad, California 92040 Plan Number: Permit Number: 2565 Field Supervisor: GREGORY SMITH, PE NIA DWG3716 Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 11/23/99. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (858) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (1) -:::,_·.--. Testing Engineers· San Diego, Inc .• 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, CA. 92111 [858] 715-5800 Fax [858] 715-5810 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _L Project Name /OL/;c/<:-t12c,fiE -Lo--r 9f?' TESD Project# _9_,__9_-_,_L/_,'/'-+.-/ ____ _ Address .L£.3S: ~/Ct2&4<?./2;o/4f:/J-920 'lo General I Subcontractor tffe-40 {;011'-tT:CCJ 1 /-/$/< f?o/J,<T: C CJ Building Permit# .fltJJGs17IC, DSA# ________________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # _________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST /concrete __ Soil --~Cone: Mix #/psi..;;;o D 0 __ ~ans&m=:o.J6/ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~pecification"&:-wEt1JEd __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Sizes #;:::-v/£.tOEd __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --__ Rini: Rebar ~Slump!/-//+(:-L 11 __ Fireproofing ~Concrete Cylinders _j_fJ_ __ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi ~it Weight __ Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ · _Consolidation ~ Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples __ Units: Block ----_·_Electrode Stora e --Mechanical __ Grout Samples ----Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Field Representative#~ ~2 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the apprr: specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. $, /). Clj /_;c--'11 6S7 INSPECTOR'S NAME -S77¥1#F4 e a()/(£S ' {Print Clearly) CERT. No/CL3'.o~o2 7713 -~f? INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ t! ';/~ DATE /f-,23-97 Form#003 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of_/ TESD Project# 99--.1/1// 1$ General I Subcontractor &J/Jo 06~Co Building Permit# IJ (()G s.5'7/?S-DSA # _______________ _ Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # _____________ Other ____________________ _ INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING, QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~oncrete __ Soil --__ Cone: Mix #/psi --~ans &r/-8,LJf;.c/!_ __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi /2ecificationsf:ff :t:tc-/ __ Masonry __ subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi __ s,zes&l(J. __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete· --~R'.nf: Rebar IJ6LSJ11ilo1:r. I'.) __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rmf: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) --__ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples ----Units: Block __ Electrode Storage Mechanical __ Grout Samples ------Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms ----Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts --Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ Fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ QSHPD __ Roofing --/ Other/1&/4~}~-li.ZQ"rj-e-1. Q __ Corrective action required __ specialty __ Other __ Corrections completed ___ -- CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with thf, apnr ns "' .. specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. 1NsPEcroR·s NAME S796&01 J1 llat9Es' ~ (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ~ ~Jc:: --51,~. 81f J-.1c-# 6S7 CERT. No.lC/?cftt-1r2.;z77IJ-S'f DATF /1-/7-C/9 For~·i:•oo3 Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. 7895 Convoy Ct., Suite 18 San Diego, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page_1_of _j_ Project Name IJIAck01<21<E f<J7 lo3 Address /t,.Qo E/;t<A<Mrf, Ctt/U5-tJ11-c/4 Cit TESD Project# --L.o/--LC/_--1-f+f-1-/_z:.l3~--- {Q ILEJL@ ,ul'E/.. :fe-b,flC/JU),f (7/ lb C {/ DSA # __________________ _ General I Subcontractor /IF-Al> &0,(1, CCJ , I Building Permit# -/)W G 3 '1f?S Plan File# ________________ OSHPD # ________________ _ Government Contract # ____________ Other ___________________ _ INSPECTION '1/ I 03 MAT'L SAMPLIN~ QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST _L Concretelft/;I}~ ~ i~jJ __ Soil --__ cone: Mix #/psi --::!;.lans /t£ (LI£ (.U& __ Prestress Cone __ Base --__ Cone: Mix #/psi Speci&t!\,Al:'Y/ Eit/£/ __ Masonry __ Subgrade --__ Cone: Mix #/psi ~Sizes 1tl.li:..WE J __ Struct Steel __ Asphalt Concrete --~Rini: Rebar /)6/s, IJ 7tJ ~ 7 __ Slump __ Fireproofing __ Concrete Cylinders --__ Rini: W.W.F. __ Air Content __ Pile Driving __ Cone Flex Beams --__ Rini: Tendons __ Temperature --Non-Destructive __ Rein!. Steel --__ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Unit Weight --Batch Plant __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ Mortar: Type/psi __ Consolidation --Soils Technician __ Mortar Samples --__ Units: Block __ Electrode Storage --Mechanical __ Grout Samples --__ Units: Block __ Torque Applied --Electrical __ Masonry Prisms --__ Steel __ Load (Pounds) __ Bolt Pull-Out __ Masonry Block ----H.S. Bolts __ Thickness __ Roofing __ Steel --__ Metal Decking -- __ Waterproofing __ H.S. Bolts --__ Electrodes -- __ DSA __ fireproofing --__ Fireproofing -- __ OSHPD __ Roofing --__ Other __ Corrective acbon required --Specialty __ Other --__ Corrections completed __ Fie!d Representative# ~~ ~a CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the observed work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the apnrc specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME-)Jp~ /IE(J /J/2tJ£5,S -(Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ ;,A~ s .. /J. c1y Lie_-# ts7 CERT. NO. /(/36 :t{/O 6< 7 7/S-t? DATE //-/9-97 Form#003 l I Inspection Schedule for Stephen P. Flores 11/17/1999 Project Info Inspector Services Requested Time In/Out Contact -•••••••••••••••••-••••• .. •••••-••JJ11R••-•••••-•••••-••-••-•••••-•••••-••-••-•••••-••-••-••••••••-•11-,•-••-•••••-a1-.11-••••••••-•••••-•••••-•••••• 99-413 Viejas Outlet Center Pha Field Welding <ff 1 1 :00 3:30 Jim Steen 5000 Willows Road, Alpine, CA Bldg Permit No 99-0603 Plan File No N/A Gov't Contract# NIA 99-488 Agee Residence~ Epoxy Dowel Bolt Anchor Inspection#~/ 14365 Cheri Lane, Poway, CA 92064 Bldg Permit No need Plan File No N/A Gov't Contract# NIA COD $200. Leave no report unless check is in hand 99-195 Maderas Country Club/4poxy Dowel Bolt Anchor l11spection =ffA-J-_ Old Coach Road and Espola Road, Poway, CA Bldg Permit No Appl.#172-99 Plan File No Gov't Contract# 8 dowels at the comfort station 99-441B Blackmore Lot 103 1620 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA Rebar Inspection c:;1/ 3 Bldg Perrnit No DWG 3785 rebar for panels Plan File No N/A Gov't Contract# N/A 99-441 Blackmore Lot 98 Rebar Inspection#..:, 1535 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA 92040 Bldg Permit No DWG 3716 rebar for panels Plan File No N/A Gov't Contract# NIA DSA#N/A 6:00 3:30 Dan Hines (760) 967-5124 [ DSA#N/A 6:30 7:30 Dave Buckles (619) 674-4797 7:00 3:30 Bill Beckett (760) 438-2633 DSA# N/A 7:00 3:30 Bill Beckett (760) 438-2633 DSA# N/A 1Tuesday, November 16, 1999 \ Page 1 of 1 \ ) : I I f · 1.} I I Ii I i I 11; ... ....... ~---~-----··-------........... _::__ ·-;--_·- ' ------------•• --.=.., --• .:. .... ,_ I .-,9 I '·- r. I I I: I' 9 \. \ THE CITY OF 1 SAN DI.EGO DEVELOPMENT SERVIC:l;S DEPARTMENT INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION Tel. (619) 492-5070 Fax (619) 492-5098 SPECIA~ INSPECTOR ID CARD Name: STEPHEN P FLORES Signature~--~-~'41l<~'---U-~?.,t.'.!,,J;<e::J.c~ Expiration:De mb~r31,2001 _ --------- SEE REVERSE SIDE FORTYPE(S) OF WORK /\UTHORIZED FOR SPECIAl::ll{SPlfCfl'ON. .... ~--/~--- . I AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE This is to certify that Stephen P Flores ID#962046 has demonstz:ated knowledge and ability by successfully completmg !he AC! certification requirements and 1s hereby recognized as an ACI CONCRETE FIELD TESTING International TECHNICIAN -GRADE I Examiner: Ed Bove Date: 05/17/1997 Expires: 05/17/2002 ~ Valid card bears ACI Hologram here eortfer.ence o·f BYilc;tjng Qfflcials · -. .,_ il~r~~ AL li{SPfaC-TQR ,ep,roD'fing 1994 · _ n -u.n ,auirciing code The inmividualnamec:i'her.eon is CERTIFIED in the categary shown, having-been so certified pursl!)antto successful completion of the presp'ibed written examin,~tiQ!l. Expiration date: Janu , 1$, . : oo No.102'7'713·86 ... ...... -JI 'll "ii ii -j i 11 f 1 I I l 1 ' . ' I ,. f r c ., '1 wj ) ~ '' ,' j I i. ··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-Inspection Schedule for Stephen P. Flores 11/17/1999 Project Info Inspector Services Requested Time In/Out Contact -••-••-••-•••••-••-•••~._11,-•••-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••lf••••••••••-••••11•••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•s•••••••••-••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 99-413 Viejas Outl~t Center Pha Field Welding <1/ 1 5000 Willows Road, Alpine, Cf,. Bldg Permit No 99-0603 Plan File No N/A Gov't Contract# NIA 99-488 Agee Residence/' Epoxy Dowel Bolt Anchor lnspection1{(1i__/ 14365 Cheri Lane, Poway, CA 92064 Bldg Permit No need Plan File No· NIA Gov't Contract# NIA COD $200. Leave no report unless check is in hand 99-195 Maderas Country Club0poxy Dowel Bolt Anchor Inspection q{~J..._ Old Coach Road and Espola Road, Poway, CA Bldg Permit No Appl.#172-99 Plan File No Gov't Contract # 8 dowels at the comfort station 99-441B Blackmore Lot 103 1620 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA Rebar Inspection c// 3 Bldg Permit No DWG 3785 Plan file No N/A Gov't Contract# N/A rebar for panels 99-441 Blackmore Lot 98 Rebar Inspection#~ 1535 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA 92040 Bldg Permit No DWG 3716 rebar. for panels Tuesday, November 16, 1999 Plan File No NIA . Gov't Contract# NIA 1:00 3:30 Jim Steen DSA#N/A 6:00 3:30 Dan Hines (760) 967-5124 [ DSA#N/A 6:30 7:30 Dave Buckles (619) 674-4797 7:00 3:30 Bill Beckett (760) 438-2633 DSA#NIA 7:00 3:30 Bill Beckett (760) 438-2633 DSA#NIA ] Page 1 of 1 I, ! : I i I I 1 I 'I i I '' ... __ ...,_ 1.._ter,-1..attonal con"-fef!tn·ei!:·g;f ... __ ------·- ---________ , .... __ --- · :--·:-~ ~-;-~, ' --~=.c-V_/ ! t j ~ '' l .. f . 'i t ' I ' I : l' /. I ' ' \ \ t THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVIC:li:S DEPAR'fMENT INSFlECTION SERVICES DIVISION Tel. (619} 492-5070 Fax (619} 492-5098 SPECIAi,, INSPECTOR ID CARD Name: STEPMEN P FLORES Signature,~l<',::(~'..£&.~V-------/.A.12::.'.£.&~ Expiratlon:De 'mb,r31,2001 . =-=,, . SEE REVERSE SIDE FORTYPE(S) OF WORK /\UTHORIZED FORSPECIA(;lff$11~ClrlON, " ·-,--.. ;· -_--· I AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE This is to certify that Stephen P Flores ID#962046 has demonsti:ated knowledge _and ~bility by successfully completing !he ACI cert1ficat10n requirements and 1s hereby recognized as an ACI CONCRETE FIELD TESTING TECHNICIA.J\J -GRADE I Examiner: Ed Bove Date: 05/17/1997 Expires: 05/17/2002 "i,11 Valid card bears ACI Hologram here ,, I ~·1 lnternat;ion~I eon·ference of ~\lil<IJng Qfflcials !?t..,ribM~·P. lllp,r,~s GEHll1ii1ED,SRICIAL Ull~iP~TOR ((ir,1y,.applJi.ij-,;;i,eq.roofing 1994 E.iliti.on -unHorm,a.uilding code The individualnamed hereon is GER-l'IFIED in the category shown, having 0een so eer:tif.ied,p.urs1:,1antto successful completi0n of the presc;ribe.a written examinati0n. Expirati0n date: Jan 1$, , : to NO. 102-7-113-86 /CBO certification attests to ompetent knowledge of codes and standards. Applicable experience should be verified by local jurisdictions. _., ( r, ' ·,, I . ) 8810 Recho road SuiteC San Diego, CA 92121 Ph: (858) 677-9860 Fax: (858) 677-9886 fax To: RENO CONTRACTING 1650 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH STE. 201 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 ROB TOMSON Fax: (619} 220-0229 Phono: (619) 220-0224 Re: INVITROGEN-LOT 98 .. Pacific Cornerstone Architects, inc. Fr.om: SEAN TRACY Pages: Date: 04/07/00 CC: 0 Urgent X For Review D Please Comment Please Reply D Please Rec:yclo • Comments: Rob, this letter serves to clarify information needed to gain approval from the field inspector .at ·the lnvitrogen Lot -98 project. The Reception area is not required to be of one-hour construction as indicated on the plans, but the wall legend indicates that similar framing (double stud wall) is to be used. The wall type indicates one hour construction; however, the added note on the construction set indicates that no one hour construction is required. This is correct.. The hopes are to satisfy the inspector with this response rather that resubmitting the plans back to Esgil Corporation for review. Regards, Sean Tracy-Principal • Page 1 TO!'e'fAIN " .• O&. UV ONE LAYER !:1/8' GYf'l!U'I XTEND Ffii0l1 FLOOR TO 6 1 AeO\IE .ATIQl IN 11141. CAvl1Y. &l\lD& &HALL 6ET a=!= ~ TO CQICcAL ALL ELE1"11:NT& ·CJF DRAIN&, CON0UIT&, ETCJ. 1/2' MIN11'11't. , el"100'TU, CGINTNJOU& 4 ~ GI-II' AL1DIED PER ICeO • 118-P. 1!'-4' 'I.F0R~ATUINP0Ul61U.41-EAD f • AT EXl6'TING &'l'Ol'ilE1'R:IN 'LA'I!! ~ ALL LPl"!!llt ~ !CHI FOR L0CAl10Nlt Ml LAYER &/a' GYP. I IIIAU. CAVITY TO•• MS0\11! AC>JACl!MT Cl!IL!llti. l:A'llED elCE OF 11.WJ. M Fil:CCll1'Sl0I: BT 6'11D MAMI' '•4182, 13''""4' ~ f'LANl!I I 11>'•61 AW-UETREM l'LA'll! mm mui mu mm mm mm !l!l!l!llllllll \ l LATJ!!e &/8' 6'11"'. ~ cid)ct iN UWJ.. CAVl'TY TO•• Al!0\II! ~ Cl!IL7 >l:A'llED elCE OF UWJ.. Ni~ BT 61\1:) • -4162, 23'·2' .-'iFLAN&:MD"·•· r ALL UET l#flUt,& J ;ti! .i.TICHI FOR 1-Q:ATI !O ClM l!ACU 6rot! Of' 11W.L6 l'Olll ALL DUCT . n?ICAI.. D!!MICI! Of'~ClRGlfl/l0Elilll .T .. n:ll" Of' w.itLL.. CIYft. eD. TO~ TOl9 Of' &'IUD A:»tiE MACN& QI NCN-el-EA'llE:> 61PE1'6) PER '101! "°19 l!IATT INSILATION N IIW..L CAVl'TY Q • -41Sl, 25'·2' )OR f'LAN& I ~'-I)' AT AU, IIET AASAe llCI l"LA'll: FON AU. lff'ER C4eEIIJ0IIII( IATIQl6 ~ L.QCATIQl6 xxxxxx @ NCN·IIIATl:D ftMrmCNo 611,D WAU. TO flo'l't'IIJC'IIR!, 5 eia• 22 GA. l1l!T AL r,,uoe AT 24' O.C.. TO 0EQ( Al!IOYE. GYP !ID, TO TER'!NA'IE AT IN:)E!lill\0E OF PECX AeO",£ ON EAQ4 81PE ALLCllll FOR 112' DS=LEcftClM AT TOP OF IIWJ.. PR:1Vl0E R•ft eATT INIIILATIQI 1M WAU. CAVllY zszszszszszs ® & MA>c. MEIGI-IT ALLOUED PER tceo • -41&2, i.•. 1' MA>c. MEIGHT Fi!:GIJl!iiEP FER FLOOR FLAN& , 14'-I)' e f'llo0Vl0E WATER JIIE8!6T.GYP. 1!10. AT AU. IIET ~ e ffli0\IIPE 19 GA. 61RAI" M ~ l"LATI= FCR ALL ~ ~ !li!R:flt TO l'I..Oalll l"I.Al6 NC l!U!VATicNe l'Olll I.OCATlcNe f'Lll"ll5ING, WAL1.a ~ a• U, GA.l"'ETAI.. 81\t)6 • :M' O.C.. TO~ C1F JOIIIT& IIAnl Cit-I= LAYER&Ja' IIIA"ta N!&l6T. GTl9. l!ID. !!A0-I 61DI! NCI "·l!I l!IAtt INIIULATICIN 1M ILIALL CAVITY TO Cl!ILNi l-l!IGI-IT. f"IIIOVIDI! 611,D PLAll:2 l!IRAClNCi QI NCN ~11-ll!D 11101! PEit M ~ 8T IITID l'IAMF MAX.1-1:IGI-IT AU.oUEP f'ER ,c:eo • 4943: 34'·1' MAX. MEIGI-IT fEQJIFil:P f'ER FLOOR FLAN& , 11)'.I)' e Flll0Yl0E WA'!ER IIE&l&T. GYP. l!!IO. AT AU. IIET l4EM e l"ROYIPI! la GA. &TltAI-M 1!!1.AC101G l"LA'I!! ~ ALL Lil"P'!!!R ~ R:FER TO FLOOR !"LAN& NCI ELEVATlCIN& F0R LCCATIGINII DOlll!ILI! &'IUD UWJ. TO CCINCl!AL 6~ 5 M' 22 GA. l'l!TAI.. &TtDe AT 24' O.C.. TO 6'IJIIJCIIJR= AeO\IE. ~ ONE LA"l'l=R OF '!!I/a' TYFE 'X' GYP 1!10 EA 610E FOR I-MR c:QIIITR GYP l!IP. TO 1£R111A1E AT ~ OF PECX Al!!OVE QI eotl-1 11101!6. l"R::iYIDI! "°" aATT tlell.ATtal lM l!ACI-I IIWJ. CAVITY. HClD eute101! PACI! Of' l!AQ.I 'IRACK IN Lll'E llffll CXl'l8IPE FAQ! ClF &'l'IIIJCnlRAL El.S'Sll'. R~INGr MINl!'V1 DEl"'n-1 !lll!Glll!ll!!t> TO CQNCl!AL &'TllllCt\lllll! \IEle"r P~ClN6. AI..LOIII l"O!II 112' ~ AT TOl9 C1I' WALi. ~ 611.0 ft.ANGE l!IRACIG ClN NON-el-EAnEP IIIPE CF WALL All Fl:CQ1'1EICE0 !ff 11'111) M.6HJ' --1::!.AX,I-E. .. ·-. . . . . . ... ---- FLOOR FLAN&714'-t,' WATER f;E616T. GYP. 1!10. AT AI.J. UET NEM ~Cit:! •GA.&~ All l!WXING FLATI= FOR ALL~~ ~ TO l'\.OOllll l"I.AN6 ND EI.J!VAT!a-1& l'QII LOCATIQI& NOl'l=, ueE M'1E AT L.OeeY &TAIR eur NOi' i.EGlll!liED TO ee OF OE H0IR c:c,N&'IRJCTICN 5 &~~ AT 24' OC. TO IN:,ENIIP!! Of' JOIIIT& Al!!Ollla w ~LA'Tl:R &la' UIA'IER ,.e616T.&Yf'. !IP. QI l:>Cf'C)l!l=I) 610E ClF EACH lll4LL TO Cet1.tlG f.E1lil,l1' w R-11 DATT NII.AT!Qt NEAQI llWJ. CAVITT f'll1iCIVl0E 11'1111) FI.AN!c !lRACM ClN NGN-all:AnED lll0E OF IIWJ. M ~ eT 11'1110 l'WU', Fl'ilOVIPIN!i HIN1l1.l-t 0EPTlol f<EQIIFEP FOR f'l.ll'tel>III TO CL1:AR &'IRICtUM= 1!11:LCU,1, MAX. MEIGHT ALLCUEP f'ER ia,q.-4182, 16>'-1' MAX. MEIGiHt' f<EGlUl1"/SP FER FLOOR R.AN& , 13'-6' e ~ WATI=R f;E6111T. GYP. l!IO. AT ALL IIET NEM e f'll;lalll0E 19 GA. &TRAP M 9AaCING FLATI= FOR ALL ll"l"ER CAeFll!rillK 1'!!Pl!R TO l'\.OOllll l"I.AN6 ND l!LevATia-1& l'Olll LOCATICNII @ & ~~ ~ .. ~ ••22 G CITP'. e TOCE! NiFEc.' M, M, • P' R • p ~ 5!Wa' GYP., TOCI: MR: I"' 1" e F " • r l!)df; E)d& E>d& EsGil Corporation 2n Partnersliip witli (jovemment for 'BuiUing Safety DATE: JULY.28, 1999 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: THE BLACKMORE COMPANY SET: Ill 9-AP-~ANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE ~ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. _ D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA O MB D EJ D PC 7 /19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersliip witli (jovemment for '13uiUing Safety DATE: DEC. 18, 1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: THE BLACKMORE COMPANY SET: II D APPLICANT @JURlb D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IZ] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IZ] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SMITH CONSUL TING GROUP 5355 MIRA SORRENTO PLACE,# 650, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 IZ] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: Please see attached for remaining corrections from previous list. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA O MB O EJ O PC 12/16 trnsmtl.dot 9320ChesapeakeDrive,Suite208 + SanDiego,Califomia92123 + (619)560-1468 + Fax(619)560-1576 CARLSBAD 98-3162 DEC. 18, 1998 1.. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three revised/ signed sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. • Please cross reference interior partition details (i.e., 11/A7) on wall legend per A1. Where are details 14A, 8 & C as referenced on 10/A5? Where is detail 10/SD3 as referenced on 1/A9? Specify diameter of power drivei:i pins on detail 3/S2. Sec. 1701. 7. Section 1921.6.10. requires 6" o.c. maximum tie spacing for piers not designed as a part of the lateral force resisting system. Please show the tie size & spacing on panels 11, 12, 15 & 16, sheet S6 and panels 22 through 25 on S7. Please provide a legend on wall elevations for shaded panel portions as shown. This legend could not be located on panel elevation plans per response. Please specify the maximum size of openings on details 15 & 20/SD3. This information could not be located on these details per response. Please note where details 14, 17 & 18/SD4 are referenced on plans. Please specify the size and number of all chord bars with connection details and references on wall elevation plans at floor levels. Please show continuous chord on S4 near grid points D-4.5 & D-5.5. ~ Please show drag connections between the return panels 13, 14, 22 & 25 on plans. Otherwise, show they can accommodate (3/8)Rw x .6.. where .6.. is the calculated diaphragm displacements at the targeted locations. Please note the nailer size over the girders on detail 7/SD5. E.g., show typical 4x nailers -to match what is noted on 19/SD5 (beyond the first 3-bays ). [Over 400 tilt-up buildings experienced partial or complete collapse during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. As a result, the 1997 UBC has increased the wall tie forces by at least 50% and diaphragm requirements have been greatly enhanced. Without the nailers along the full length of the girders their shear carrying capability is seriously compromised. Please do not return these plans without this correction]. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre @ 619/560-1468 at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. . ..... ~ ~' EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersliip Witli (jovernment for 'Buiufing Safety DATE: OCT. 1, 1998 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: THE BLACKMORE COMPANY SET:I ~:~ANT D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans tr~nsmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IZI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IZI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SMITH CONSUL TING GROUP 5355 MIRA SORRENTO PLACE,# 650, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 IZI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Per.son D REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA [gl MB [gl EJ O PG 9/21 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 OCCUPANCY: B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 28,254 SPRINKLERS?: YES REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 9/17 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED:OCT. 1, 1998 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD USE: OFFICE ACTUAL AREA: 28,254 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 31' OCCUPANTLOAD: SHELL DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/21 PLAN REVIEWER: Ali Sadre This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) comforw.dot CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit three new sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. 2. All sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 3. Please include the following code information on the Title Sheet for the proposed building (as described on T1 under future proposed use): + Occupancy Group: B(Office)/ S1 (Storage)/ F1 (Industrial) 4. Please fully dimension all the glazing on plans including their height on elevation plans. Table 24-A & Graph 24-1. 5. Please specify on A-3 the following information for the skylight, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manµfacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. 6. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. 7. Please show interior partition details with references on plans for all various wall types identified on A 1. 8. Specify diameter size & embedment of power driven pins on detail 11/A7. Sec. 1701.7. 9. Guardrails (Section 509.1 ): a) Please show post spacing on details 21 & 22/A6. 10. Please show one hour doors instead of 20-minute doors for the one hour rated stair enclosures. 11. Where are details 15, 19A, 19CB & 25 as referenced on 10/A5? 12. Please fill out all blank bubbles on architectural plans. 13. Please revise the Special Inspection list on sheet S1 to match that on sheet T1. 14. Please mak~ sure the names of the Special Inspection firms are identified on revised plans·(similar to that on T1 ). CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 15. Please clarify references to sheets S19 & S20 under legend notes 1 & 4, sheet S3. Similarly, reference on column schedule under C-2. 16. Please complete all C-& F-notations on S3. 17. Please show elevator pit structural details & references on plans. 18. Please show panel joints per wall elevation plans on S-3. This is missing in some cases, i.e., joints for panels 8, 10, 15, etc. per S3 versus panel elevation plans & sheet A 1 need to be coordinated. 19. The location of doors 7 & 1 O per foundation plans (S3) do not match sheet A 1. 20. Where are C-2 & F-2 referenced on foundation plans? 21. Please dimension footings all the way around on S3 (similar to what is shown on line 9). 22. Detail 2/SD4 as referenced on S3, line A (at each end), is incorrect. 23. Detail 4/SD1 as referenced on S3 at construction joints is incorrect. 24. Detail 14/SD3 as referenced on S4, at grid points C-1 & C-9, is incorrect. 25. On sheet S4, please note all steel beams are equally spaced, U.N.O. 26. Please fill out all blank bubbles on structural plans; too many to itemize. 27. Please identify the curved beam size on line D, sheet S4. 28. Please show the curved beam radius and its center on S4, line D. 29. Please identify the beams on S4, between lines C & D (from 3.5 to 6.5) in line with the lobby opening. 30. Please show the width of the diaphragm nailing type IV on roof nailing schedule, sheet S5. 31. Please complete the referenced detail on roof nailing schedule, sheet S5. 32. Please identify the ICBO approval number on roof nailing schedule (for nailing type I). 33. Please provide a detail through the entry projection on sheet S5, near line D. CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 34. Detail 2/SD2 as referenced on S5, at line 9, is incorrect. 35. Detail 1 0/SD2 as referenced on S5, at line D, is incorrect. 36. Please specify the spacing of all purlins on S5, including those at each end. 37. Detail 18/SD1 as referenced on all panel elevation plans appears incorrect. This should apply at openings only (instead of piers), no? 38. Please identify all chord bars per pages L4 & L5 of calculations on plans. 39. Please show specific references at all applicable locations for dowel-to-footing connections on panel elevations per calculations, e.g., L-17. 40. Please show all rebar/tie size & spacing on panels 11 through 16, sheet S6. Also note the panel thickness per calculations on S6. Similarly, for panels 22 through 26 on S7. 41. Please provide a legend on wall elevations for shaded panel portions as shown. 42. Please note where panel 26 is referenced on plans. 43. Please show connections between panels 10 & 11. Make sure that this is a connection on the exterior face. Please show how this type of panel connection is achieved (i.e., with epoxy anchors). Similarly, for panels 16-to-17, 22-to-23 & 24-to-25. 44. Please specify the thickness of all footings on SD1, which are not shown on foundation plans. E.g., details 3, 8 & 10 through 19 (except 15) on SD1. 45. Please note the distance from top of footings to finish slab or to finish grade, or reference to another detail for this information on all relevant details of SD1. 46. Please note where details 1, 7, 8, 10, 11 & 12/SD1 are referenced on plans. 47. Please dimension the length of rectangular base plate on detail 19/SD1. 48. Please justify column tie spacing on detail 12/SD1. The 1997 UBC recommends 4" tie spacing if the column resists lateral forces and 6" o.c. if it is not a part of the lateral force resisting system (lessons from the Northridge earthquake). In either case, 8" is too wide. Similarly, on details 9/SD2 & 20/SD4. 49. The reinforcement is not noted on plans per remarks on detail 1 0/SD1. CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1,1998 50. Detail 9 is missing as referenced on 7/SO1. 51. Please note where details 9, 12 & 19/SO2 are referenced on plans. 52. Please clarify 1-1 /2" decking on 9/SO3 versus 2" on S4. 53. Please note the gage of closure plates on 19/SO3. 54. Please specify the maximum size of the openings on details 15 & 20/SO3. 55. Please clarify details 19/SO2 as referenced on 1 & 2/SO3. 56. Please note where details 1, 8, 11, 18 & 19/SO3 are referenced on plans. 57. Please provide information on the bracing per detail 11/SO3. 58. Please specify deck-to-WF welding per detail 3/SO3. 59. Specify ICBO approval number for the decking on detail 9/SO3. 60. Detail 13/SO4 is missing as referenced on 11/SO3. 61. Please show gusset plate size and welding on detail 11/SO4. 62. Clarify 8" angle (leg) as dimensioned on L6x per detail 14/SO4. 63. Please show tie size on detail 20/SO4. 64. Clarify reference to sheet S20 on detail 20/SO4. 65. Please note where details 4, 5, 7, 9, 11 & 20/SO4 are referenced on plans. 66. Please clarify the ICBO approval number for anchors on detail 9/SO4. Also specify special inspection is required. 67. Where is detail 13 as referenced on 7/SO4? 68. Where is detail 7/SO5 as referenced on 11/SO4? 69. On details 17 & 18/SO5, note the pilaster ties are not shown for clarity. 70. Please note where details 12, 14 & 18/SO5 are referenced on plans. 71. Clarify reference to sheet S21 on 19/SO5. CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 72. Please specify the size of all ledgers on framing plans. Per detail 1 0/SO5, this information is not noted on plans. 73. Please clarify reference to S22 on 14/SO5. 7 4. Where are the canopy beams per calculations, page RF-2? 75. Please note the thickness of both panels on detail 12/SO5. 76. Please note the nailer size over the girders on detail 7/SO5. E.g., show typical 4x nailers -to match what is noted on 19/SO5 (beyond the first 3-bays ). 77. Where is the trellis on plans per detail 14/SO5? 78. Where are the 9-1/4" panels per page P-3 of calculations? 79. Please specify the size of all plates on detail 14-A/SO5. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the licensed designer. 2. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the sizes and locations of the gas meters and water meter; and the sizes, routes, and slopes of the building sewer, storm drainage system, site gas lines, and site water lines. 3. As per UPC, Section 710.0, provide backwater valves on all building drains which serve plumbing fixtures with flood rim elevations below the public upstream manhole rim elevations. Only fixtures with flood rim levels below the public upstream manhole rim elevation may flow through a backwater valve. • Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. CARLSBAD 98-3162 OCT. 1, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PREPARED BY: Ali Sadre BUILDING ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (ft. 2) OFFICE 28,254 , Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 DATE: OCT. 1, 1998 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN . VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 785,461 !ZI 1994 USC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 2,871.93 !ZI 1994 USC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 1,493.40 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad I ¥i h· 110441 i h•i •14 ·ki I I; ,t4 h I DATE: /O-t&o ::2@'. BUILDING ADDRESS: . BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~8::...:ke..M.--=..:~n-4---"nU,..~'-\---~, Lt,.L------------- ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUfylBER: c2,a. A L 3 c> ~ ,g 3 EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. (A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with~Make necessary corrections to plans or specificatio~ for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. 1~/d3/9f!J Date: 0/; :?j 'z ~ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON D Dedication Application Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ D Dedication Checklist City of Carlsbad D Improvement Application Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 D Improvement Checklist Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4510 D Future Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION D Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No: D Grading Submittal Checklist Lots: D Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Carlsbad Tract: D Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 H:1woR01~19f5.sJlEatsig~•m'el~s~t1.Fem@arlsbad, ·cA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 4@.1ai:§91'69 a a a a a a a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Y. Easements CT ®S -;? ~, (/'vL J-s ~-l ol.Pi3t 5 lt;f-?8 Su,..G. c,2'} lf -0 / fr 8. Existing & Proposed Structures C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will ·provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." 8. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address · B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. _______________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: __________ _ H:IWORO\DOCS\CHKLSnBuildmg Plancheck Cklst 8P0001 Fonm JJ.doc 2 Rev 12/26/96 CJ CJ CJ CJ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ ______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: ___________ _ Date: ----- IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ _______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ---- 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ _______ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:\WORDIDOCSICHKLSnBuildlng Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fann JJ.doc 3 Rev. 12/26/96 1st.I Q Q Q Q )( Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q )( K $.e.t'.-~ t 3 ~~ (_p;'.fV'._e-,Jr-5 Q Q Q Q Q Q BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. , ?a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading · requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). ?b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: ---------- ?c. Graded Pad Certification required. bNote: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) C"° ~ sJ.:,.__~ ~~ .c,....,~t&"J ~) ?d.No Grading Permit required. ?e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS @ A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: H:IWORDIDOCSICHKLSnBu1ldmg Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 4 Rev. 12/26/96 ·/ _..- X 2nd.I 0 , 0 0 if o 3rd.I 0 0 0 0 @ A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 12. ~quired fees are attached 0 No fees required H:IWORDIDOCS\CHKLSnBu1lding Plancheck Cklst BP0001 FOlln JJ,doc 5 Rev. 12126196 G-" , ___________________ _ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D .,..Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. ~ Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: /fb ol.O Prepared by: J7I ~ (f!-c-~~~Bldg. Permit No. C(S CfB 3 l 6fl.. Date: /0/4.; /4~ Checked by: ____ Date: ~1 ----- EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 6b.a).J Tt\rJ-:t'CL · Sq. Ft./Units: ~Bd.5'~ 66'0 {!e-el ,:;t..s;' v<-Ja,,eA,v.s:...) I Types of Use: _______ Sq. Ft./Units: _____ _ ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. ~ . t;Jerxsr\ .s/ Types of Use:t;k.4{ I o\i-vo Sq. Ft./Urnts: ~ J ;ldlrO { f-t~ a$ {,(/().~) Types of Use: _______ Sq. Ft./Units: _____ _ FEES REQUIRED: EDU's: 5. k> ..S EDU's: ----- ADT's: / tf / ADT's: ------ WITHIN CFO: ~no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) ONO ,*. 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: ___ _ FEE/UNIT:_____ . X NO. UNITS: __ _ ~RAFFIC l~PACT FEE =$ (2) 7 ADT's/UNITS: J Lf / X FEE/ADT: d-6< ~3. BRIDGE AND T~OROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 ADT's/UNITS:_____ X FEE/ADT: ___ _ ~CILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_5=---- =$ 3j()~ DIST. #3 ) =$ ~ / ~ UNIT/SO.FT.: Q(/'31. a_59' X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: • 'fD c;y" 5. SEWER FEE =$ 11,30~ PERMIT No . .Sf3frJ0~/(3 EDU's: $. 6 5 X FEE/EDU: /€]SL/ Qr] BENEFIT AREA: F DRAINAGE BASIN:. __ _ =$ I D/l 7 !5 EDU's: 5,f>S X FEE/EDU: /0 70 =$ l,oYs =$ p{ 7 t 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) , 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA. ____ . HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ e{ ACRES: _____ _ X FEE/AC: ___ _ =$ l TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ 2o;tJ.L( *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMSIFEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 7/13/98 \ [IJRSCH & COMPANY CONSUL TING ENGINEERS • Since 1965 • Planning • Civil Engineering • Surveying• Environmental September 13, 1999 Attn: Carlsbad City Engineer City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 Re: Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 98. Subject: Building Pad Over Excavation Certification. Based on our field survey on September 13, 1999, the grading of the pad for the referenced lot has been substantially completed in accordance with the approved grading plan to the approximate final elevation. The final elevation is certified to a tolerance of +/-0.1 foot, and the horizontal location is certified for approximate location. Sincerely, HIRSCH & COMP ANY 3550 Camino del Rio North, Suite 305, San Diego, CA 92108-1740 • (619) 563-4545/FAX (619) 563-4548 Tucson • Phoenix " . ()c, 00 ~ v-" I ~ -"'") I ci .l!! $ "' "' C Cl ~J >, >, ..c J:J ;i;; ~ -is -u Ql Q) .c: I; u (.) C: C: "' "' a: a: cyf D r l * Cl ~ ~ ~ -u Q) I; (.) C: "' a: D p(an1vt(\.d ~f~ ( <tS8) 7~3 -l/7 77 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB 5R~ I c.ei ,}- Planner f:::laf ba (/J.-~ ne..J.'-1 Address \loJ O FZlrA-J.M, Cl<<! lrl-&fK Phone (619) 438-1161, e~nsion 4~'2.~ APN: ,z.! '2--1'3-0 -"2.-~ Type of Project & Use:'?hetl bt~ Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: C. t1 General Plan:--''P__,_I __ Facilities Management Zone: ._(p __ _ CFO (in/out) # __ Date of participation: ____ Remaining net dev acres: __ _ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ____________________ ) Legend: ~ Item Complete (0) Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO )( TYPE ---- DATE OF COMPLETION: ________ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ~ D D Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO_¼__ TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO. _______ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: __________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ----------------------- ~ D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NOX-_ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Cmistal Permit Determinatio'A Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal. Permit Determination Log as needed. ~ '',:;.it·.') Dc;1ta Entry Completed? YES .. ·. ,', No. ' · (Enter CB #.; l,)ACT-; ,NEXT1-2; Construct hoUsirig Y/N; •Enter Fee Amp.unt (S~e fee sched.ufe for amouht); ·Return) .. ;; • , , , • • -~, , . •• , . • -~ •f, I f ' ' I ' ' ' • ' ~ ~•1 ,~ •.__ ' }. 1 ---:-' : ~"' I ,' • ;. 'Site Pl~il: J~ .~. --.\ \· .. ' r. ·/nl~o· .. ·. ·l_:;Y ~ L-1 . Pniniide c1 fully ·dimehsioflal site pl·an drawn to scale. . Show: Nortli ~ arfow, ·· property ·l.ines,. easements, exi'$ting:,:ant(p~opo.sed' str(Jctures, streets, ·existing · · ' str€$et impr¢vernents, right~of~vvay .,width-, -dirtte~si6nJ·1 · setbacks and fexlst'ing topographical lines_. · -~ t:iJ;(?lc "-<.a.. '4-S t ---. ' ' '.~. ' Qt· D D · · 2. Provide legc!I. descri·ptioh of property and asse·s·sor's parcel number. Zoning: @rts~.!· ';::;,c~,fy • .,Ji-, Dlt!Jtd ~-('t1, -. S"d -}._ , ' ' Required: '30 . Reqµired;-· f~ ·' . ·.· Shown 30 1 ------ shown --'7,.._._1-'-0--'"1 ·-=-----'-- Sho wri _ 1 w. r · · ·, · .ntenor · 1. e: · .. -·l)l O:·.D @)5fo @l'A D Required __ '---_....c..:..;.. __ __,__ . Requir.ed: . $.6 '·. {;/di ·. · _ . -l~tPv~ ~lec.t,•.,_,, · Jo' - Street Sid.e: . .Rear: ------,-- $ p own. --,--2---,...'.3-tJ~'___,."'--,-- $h""'"" 70I Accessory strtict.~re-setbacks;·_AJ/rf-. Front: Required Sho.wn ,-,-----.,,----"'--,-------,---,-.'-'-,--- ·1 nterior s·ide: Requireqf · _ _-·------------Shown ~-----'----- Street Siae.: Refquired . Shown --~---------Hear':· R~quired Sh.own ----"------'-------'---Stt1.:1cture separation: · R~quired Shown -----'---'oo- 3,. Lot Coverage: -Required SQ /C· .yn·A¥' Shown _ _,_I CP___._Y-"'--"-~- 4 . .Heigbt: Hequir.e~t 5;:i'' n:JAX /YJ-T ~€ iJ'l:.U-. ·_lJi=p,c.e IJ(.G '9.'fJ,~,S'f ~ . , l/S ... · n, ·5. ·Par.king: Spaces. Required .. / / 3 _· ·· ·shown -'--.._J"'-0=-~-_,,__ Guest Spac~s Require(~ -~pa· t!it ~h~wn--,-,__,..------------- . . . . . , ;J, (( ~f4'i:t4 '""'•ICJ Adcl_1t10nal 'Comments -. . . ) ... Se-e a--Hzu;/hec!,., Cn-n m-e;i.-f:s ' ' ' . -' ' ' .·, ' ' . 0 K TO IS§U E AND ENTERED APPROVAi. ill(TQCOMPl;JTER ~ ,¥vm,;1J.4 DATE "t ( l~ / 15 Carlsbad Research Cenfer Septe1?1ber 2, 1999. Ms. Colleen M. Blackmore The Blackmore Company 1530 Faraday Avenue Suite 170 Carlsbad: California 92008 Re: Lot 98 Building and Landscape Plan Design Review Dear Colleen: Archifecfural· Review Committee . The Architectural Review Committee of the Carlsbad Research Center has completed it's review of the building and landscape plans for Lot 98 submitted by your company. The plans were checked for compliance with the CRC Design Review Guidelines pertaining to building design, parking requirements, landscaping and irrigation. Attached to this letter is a checklist that identifies the specific areas rev~ewed·and the committee's findings. The plans were found to be complete and in accordance with the CRC standards and are therefore deemed "APPROVED." With this approval you are free to move on to the next step in the development process. The committee does recommend that a mQw curb be installed along all turf areas to facilitate maihtenance of these areas. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Tom Hageman Architectural Review Committee cc: J. .Ridge 1530 f or~doy Avenue Suite 100 • Carlsbad; ·CA 9.2008 • (760) 931-0780 • (760) 931-5744 fox \ I REVIEW CRITERIA CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 98 PLAN REVIEW ANALYSIS Septe111.ber 1999 , PLAN DATA. CRC STANDARD PLAN SHEET REFERENCE · _ :i=s.it.;1~4''.f ~µ.~i'.i~!~i~~f:;~I~,tNi\f Wifa\~f !f f/1f :~\t:k),f:ttlf 5:\f'.:H tt:/ttf }t\}\\J}ti(t~:-:-_:;: :i// :_:-; ---, / :'.:/!._;_?-<\ --: :-_·}:, _-::· :-· ----'._'·\ · __ : __ : _ :_,:·.:· Site Area · 90,548 sq. ft. Tl :J,uilding Area (:first floor) 14,449 sq. ft. Tl (second floor) 13,755 sq. ft. Tl Total Buildin~ Area 28,254 sq. ft. Tl Site ·Coverage 16.0% Less than 50% ofthe gross area Building Height: 32 ft. Less than 3 5 ft. Tl Parking Requirements·_ B4ildmg Type _. 24,750 sq ft. office space , 99 spaces · 1 space/250 sq. ft. (99 req.) Tl 3,504 sq. ft. manufacturing/wareh01:1se · 9 spaces 1 sp~ce/1000 sq. ft. (4 req.) Tl Total p~king spaces provided ' ', 108 Tl Standard spaces 82 Tl 1 Compact spaces 20 Up to 25% of total spaces Tl . Handicap spaces 6 Tl Setback from Faraday Avenue . 30ft. 30 ft. Sheet 2 Grading Plan Setback from ·interior property line 10 ft. 10 ft. Sheet 2 Grading Plan Sidewalks Existit).g Section 2. 7 CRC Design Guidelines Lqading dock O.K. · Section 2.8 CRC Design Guidelines AG-1 Trash Enclosure O .K. Durable 6 ft. :aigh enclosure AG-1 ~creening of exterior mechanical equlpment O.K. Section 2.10 CRC Design Guidelines A3 F en_ces and screening walls None . Maxim'um height 8 ft. Screening of exterior electric~ equipment None Section 2.11 CRC Design Guidelines Builcling Mass and.Fo~ O.K. S~ction 3 .3 CRC Design Guidelines A4 Landscape Area 24,237 SCJ, ft. Tl REVIEW CRITERIA Landscape Coverage · Plant Palette Irrigation System Installation & maintenance within setback· Streetscape design Parking lot landscap,ing faterio! property lin~ planting PLAN DATA 26.8% O.K O.K. O.K O.K.' O.K. O.K. CRC STANDARD No less than 15% PLAN SHEET REFERENCE Sectio!,l 4.2 CRC Design Guidelines L3 .1 Section 4.2. 7 CRC Design Guidelines Ll .1 Secti<;>n 4.2.1 CRC Design Guidelines · L3.1 Section 4.2.4 CRC Design Guidelines L3.l Section 4.2.5 CRC Design Guidelines L3.l Section 4.2.6 CRC Design Guidelines L3. l ' Reclaimed water irrigation system . O:K. Section 4.2.8 CRC Design Guidelines . L0.0 1. Recommend installation of a mow curb at edge of turf areas .. City of Carlsbad 98320 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Thursday, September 24, 1998 Contact Name Address Smith Consulting Arc Reviewed by: ~/,,~ 5355 Mira Sorrento Pl Ste 650 City, State San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. CB983162 Planning No. Job Name Lot 98 Blackmore Job Address 1620 Faraday ---~....._ ____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ jg! Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is 'based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. · For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st~--2nd~--3rd~-- Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 98_3_2_0 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619} 931-2121 ,.. / "1, • . . HOR()WITZ 1;AYLOR ·ENGINEERING STROCTORAL & CIVIL CONSULTING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: ___ L_o_T __ 9_0 _________________ _ DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: CONCRETE STRENG1H AT 1WENTY EIQHT DAYS: 0~a0 /2::;'()() PSI MASONRY: GRADE "N" CQijCRETE BLOCK F' M = ________ PSI · MOR'l;'AR: TYPE S 1800 PSI GROUT: 2000 PSI REINFORCING STEEL: A-615 STRUCI1JRAL STEEL: A-36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH JOISTS BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS GRADE 40: GRADE 60: #2 #2 #5 AND LESS (U.O.N.) #6 AND LARGER STUD OR BETTER SEISMIC FORCE: Z ;;::. O '4 ,r -=--I, q REPORT BY: Yi: 0 60 [ 1-0 J l N,C.., • WIND FORCE: ZO MP Hr t_=-Xf, ~ DESIGN LOA.'DS: FLOOR DEAD LOAD REPORTNO.: W,0,1-4--14-A-~~ SOIL PRESSURE,. ~OOp,,f, t ROOF DEAD LOAD SLOPING ROOFING PLYWOOD JOISTS __ JNSU)'..,. & CLG. MISC. TOTAL= ROOF LIVE LOAD SLOPING FLAT FLOORING PLYWOOD JOISTS INSUL. & CLG. MISC. TOTAL= FLOOR LIVE LOAD INTERIOR BALCONY EXIT WALKWAY 40 PSF 60 PSF (U.O.N.) 100 PSF WALLD INTERIOR EXTERIOR 10 PSF 16 PSF ~ These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion uf · the structure by this office. These calculatio~~ are not valid if altered in any way, or not accompanied by a wet stamp and signature of the Engineer of Record. ----··· . 8-!2£-9~ 3914 Murphy Canyon Rd. • Suite AlOO • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-4383 • /FAX (619) 560-884qp -· . Ct t<:J3/6 2- // fl __ ;_ -~_:___/_.aC:?A-0-~- 10 -==u~ Pua1rJ$ . -ro Pua1,,g ~r(/--ly 3.-o 3.o .S~rH 1 c1 l ~ 5" I , S . . I, I I , I 2 X 1-=:, Lo \ ' 0 IN. s-UL~T:I or---.J. 2. t--0 Put2L1t--1s. \ \ ~ . ~ P (Z...1 r---l t.Lt=: f2.? --- (..7 it2..t)~,Z... c_ E=L L u,J. (::J 2. .o Q. .. C) \, + I. ~ f>1/S,c__ /f>i'c"C...!+. to ps.f \t p.srf To 77-:--1-p l;;f.:.>·o l..a,Ao_ L 1 \/L:: Lo r.,..-v --=-2-0 f$=' ' { 12.t:s-b LL C...t 10 LI::: ) F1-oo~: To 131=:P-M~ -ro 6l.l(Z.{0c:~ _.. I /-L-oot, (7 I. 0 l, 0 . "5tt-~bTttl"1 c.1 . 4-oro ·4o. o MTL. ~L-~/l.1Nl. S.c:> S.o [3 l=P-M t; ?.. . c::? (;:i[(2..!,I;:-~ I,~ \' ~ 5,f /2--i_ N ic:,L.t:::--U 2.o 2.. .. b CG\ l... L N,(.__\ 2,,0 ,0 2-tJ. 0 p,c.e...1l_TI ON MI~ c../ fY\i=G/-t. I,; I.;:::,, 7\ rs.+. 7 ':?r~+- /btc,.L bt;:;Ao L.uoo. L1 \Jt= LaP-P .5V 3.0 1,s- l, I \ I CJ 2 ~o \ \ s;- ~~7. l'-0 ...., ~.CJ ---=>-0 2.. 0 \' ~ 2.,o [CJ' 0 -\ \ '::::,. ~~ f .S. ~' 3, 0 I,~ t, I /, c;, 2,o I Is:. tS f'.s._f. + :;-p~ /: P.Afl-llT"i o•I- . .. -· ... ; . ... . -. . . . . .. . .. • ·:.. • :.!•. ··-·· t' r/J:::: '? ( to -tl-t::,) ~ C:, o I~ ?-~ 2.-~ , .... flt ~ ~D -t-,.. p ... 7-,-ft, . .d.. _::i:. r -~-~r -=-13. ~ r M -r_: ,, U£,.f." 2 X b --;:, ~ r-1~. ':: . ~, b .fr n,_ v~~ ~ C:P5 + ,~ ~ ---_Z.0, B 1~1.,._4 .. --.. -. .. .. . . I .JJ1~ _ 1_a_¥~. ~'T_~1:-Jc\!J f· '7J. ~ ~ ~ ~. "TU~\- / -;. I 4-4-_';1/, \... IL., , 1/"" ( 2g) , --5"1 i .r-t. z.. ,.'. '--. L.-, ~ I b /-? ~: C , ,. ~ /2, fv\J)),.1,_ --7 '=, t .,_ I \ d. I=--;o '"' ~ -~~ J--_ i,,e, I / W ,;-1/'2-( ~ -t 2o P-•) "'-\4o };(-tJo~l7? 0 \f, f--= ~-~b M --= \. '?b \ ... tA t -:.. 1f t 4 I,. ~ 'M O'I €,(l. ~N.:.>P "( _ ~L.. , r ~ i·. ?;;~ 11, ~L -.. 4-,.( 1 Lt, ~-;. -1.~~ t. V v v i ,I· 4r ,f' ~'-i r /2,p- 1 3' t +' I" ~--L9 X t~:. l • t 1' 1 4-I W'2... MTL :b-ervvGE;t-J A ~ ~ Q -:. ~ L-t.....r~ I / -~ :-~-. ~ ~ 11 -t-~~}.-;--~i:~ I~{_ . ~-:-. j_. 1 IL-, sL..-~-0 b~~-) ( '2. ~ipr,."-1 . ·- U ':::. ~ LN l<.cx'2...c.,.. r,/\~(~ ':. 7 ~ ,_11. -:C --Jol ,'-"~ . ---- Act.9-. . . / T ~A. -7... ¥'"' (2--c,)-,.. 9 ( l ~-~ f2---.v-( , A ..... ,~c)) -: I '2.. .. i /. ~ ct civc::.,Lr-1 ~ ,e_ a 2,.1 ( I -tD,{) ~ ST (._-.._·r_.. ~ S 0 ( t -• I 2-. '1) -. +:f-, f s. f' , U~G' l-v 2-1 :I-4-J. C.. -:. S-/zS ---------(v\u L u--v -.. l ~ '2, I I,( • t-.r --~tr1 ,.,, ,, ~-0,5 II ! A ,, .J->'7, \_•.·-::_I 7., . I ~....J'T ,? • :, L. ' L. I ";: 4--4--r~ C. ' u S,.G: (,.J t 8 x 4,,-o Cc.._,-·¾-) (v\J,ltr,..,-~ l 3..s I k. T · ---~1 rz..._ , ,,.,.__ -1-- ____ . v~~--t..vL~x. ~ .... (c-=--_'}/+,}. --~-=--l.?;s'~ ···- --r -=-.c..o I z. l'.A" + ft -;. 2 _!_:_--; L 7 I + ~-o) ( ~) -: { 7 ~. 2 P1 ._ (),;.;_ t 1;-i) (11 ts"')(1·"1,,) t~ ~ lf? " . ~rz, --~' [ \IC--. '{-II. -:. St -~---· --4. 1. . 1,-// ' . -. r"1 ----.; .. . ---'lh - _A·_ .. -----.. --___ ,,_ 0.-L _ -;. 0.1, v ~ =-S, \ .fi t ti~J -k , .,.-~· t s . lo' p --t . I } 5"' [o' Y"'-t.lf.ovv ~ l I 4 I " ' r -;..-~c O ,v-1.a ~-- ----- v:;,e w-16 /(.~ (~-=-/-z. 0) M.;U.,~: lb .(;._,k ~ :c-~ ""?o I ,'"" .. ~Y'-1 -:_--;0 ___ 6:). _9,~-r. @. ~ @.,i Q -: 3, o' .-~,--:~~(i--~--~1~-)--(J 1-=t ~~) -----L-;~ ~[ f ---~t ~~ 01.. --·1_(.)/1. ( i1_1-~) -: "~ \ ~ ( .f -: --~~ \ "' ( -~ ~ S'ff} i fi-~ v\) . . - -·fi_--==--~0.-~ 5 ':. · ··rt-i;~ ·:-T~. ---~-~-------. . . -..... (.;;h":f.:> ·-. IJ\ I\ ( 11... '"' -;:. ·t(:;i b . ~# .. ····· ·+· ... T" r4 ~ __ b'i:S 1'4---. }) D. '---~-~ -.. • ..,. t "') le::? ----- I vv, I -~--t~_ __;__ __ ---I,. - J 1 . ·, -;1, .'1 --I Vf.7 (0 - U)>~ vJ 1...1 X 5° ( C '::,. s-~' ') t"" c:«,crw = l ~ 1 ,,... I ~-9 t,,f-, 1-... <t .J -9---3,J /f.f-...-::. l·={~v)-,3~.., 4-.~ rz..-=-f (A-•::,-0--;. I?.- :, L.. L-. -:.. 4-4---,f.S.~ • u .>6 q1 l ~ x. 4--t,. C.. -=-¾ '' rYl~ -... !~51~-tJ \ I -: /,fl IM F-5 f\ ,. I o ( 1 I +->") ( ! 1z.,) --°t , 1 ~ f ;;>-: ~l-i ( ..,_,-+ .:>~) l l*l'i,,) -:: '9. -4 ~· rt·-::. 1'2.. ,& ~ () -~-' f-1l-' -. I '2 , 1 · IV\-: j'"2.--o,2,.. . , ... 7,, fl; ~ i r~ --441; ,,,.. v' 4' A-,,,_ • "; • bq--II VJIE w ( '6 X'. 4-o f.,, ¼ ') ~ltrw ~ {ij-1~ T :. ht 1.,., (iv- .t ~a>~ .?(£2;) .. J1:cT ©1 <b · Q-> 3,c)1 ,, w ... , ~ c 1, · +-4-4-r~ )---: )1$""1) w r . -l f-, 11.1 ~ (l" t UJ t~ 2-k, J , c.. -;. . i4 . 1 t I,,., 1'" ~ -~ 2--',, i- {4-'i [(P' . . . I II' '(Vo. -:. i,i4- '2/ .... b;,4--C ~(,.) --r 4 ;. U.)~ W'2-f X C:? 2-----J:::.-D,t.. 11 ? ,:S~ yv)_u~ --'½"'I I'-k, :J:-::: J ~?; 0 ,4-- 1/-A (lrl.._ w -=-i;,z. ( 11 -r .>-V ) ::. 4-8 4-t ~ ~""--STP lfZ--> f-: ½ ( \ vQ -t-1 t) ( I ½ ) __ ~. ~ k. p l f-'--..-S-7 u?.., l\.- ~-=-+b74'_ lb Vt\-; '2. 2.~4 . .('_ I~ % . ,4-·..r~ ~-~ 1M . D.-l . I) ·l-~ -·-i ' /I' If-" f = Io ( 1 r +s-o) C 1~) __ 4-2 -'~ " 'v . , - $' U>~ Wf,Z..,.)((4- Mc!.{ tr-~ ? 0 ·+ -w . :r -~ ft, (J?. /,-.&- k i' l,1\1 =-57> ti . . I . ¥~ (2~_ -r -~P i~ .>~~ _:~r. _-?_f::)o _l/ ~-, l½_ ( 11 ~~-v) f-::fV -&:;-s-l>; ,,,. ·-:. f];f Q I~ ,, __ v<tbiib -------r""' dA.h-·-1 t., 1---"'. 4 . r·-_, 1v) . I ft> / t.vi r 1 Ji..,,.. __ '--1.J_, _ __., -b l u~~ wl b(t...-b NA!<,\P ~ l~ .C.Ac ... :C ~ Joi . k. fi ~ ~2~ (7?t_~I-}( 2-°;{)-:: 17. -8 . ).. t=-, , -r-P. • ,, ~ ( ,z 7} --nB 4-,__ ?-~ r (A-1~0 ) --10) i: L · L · -::: . 8 I ( .:,--u) --+ I pe.. t. f-i. ~ (~ -t t~} ( 7.3, t+I') (~) ; rJ._-7, ~. . . . "' (Z'--~ I}_, l . (l~~ _1,J, i·' ·1 ~f I, ~ . 11 ' r ,t .'l))~ ~2~1-?<: fA-+ -( C-;_ ..Si '') ('l\.,kl~---...l~-~ . f-:.-L., - ~ : _'_f1'f"~ I'~ <t It: ( ,I < V ' (0 U)€ <--v Z l X :;;,(..; ( (_ --~~ ') /V' J./.1..Pv.J ~ ( ~ 7 .c r C..-.. • ~ --j Z) 4 I_',,_ t ) F-~ ? 6_) t,cr. @ ,;(: ~, \L ~. ? 1', -y-.p.. ~ ½ C,,,) .:_ 310 42- f': lo ( 1 ~-t tt'4) ( ~) --\I. 7 ~ e_ -=-l L-, ( ~) ~ ,_ ~ 17, {&, "· .. '-:) <.D . &-er @ +© / ~ --. . . f ~ (7 ?-1° ++--) l lu)_(_ '??)-;. ~5, \ a,.. (L ~ 11. 5-(1, ~ I '(vi::; ·t 1 S .; r~ .. :; 4-J 1\-..+ . /:i~-, -V ___ _ l-. -;:: __ 0/2./L :. LL-,~ ~.,,__ p.,.,c •. \fS~ \..vt, l )I. 4-4-C ~ -¾. '· YV\,u~ -:-L(o1. ,~ .. ~ _ _ :r --84---~ ,'M 4-> Ee J:). L--<:. .. tJ% "'J"2-J .x '>; C:~" ~, 1rP-. ~ Jo (f'0.) __ '700 ~ ~ ~ .... y-(A. -~ ->-..;i) ~ [ '2--"--: ; I Jr, ~Ai---J.IJ&;'i , ' L. , l.-• -,. ca.r .,.. r . u S> ~ w 7,, ix~ o VV\c:J.{~ ~ ·I '6 ; . '-"" · ·r---.... -'f B ·4--1 '1,.,+ V.S ~ vv Z. l X 4--4- N" ..I{,{.,.,____ -l '-?.. .(> -l--, r --8 a---3' ? Ci)· 13,c-r-; @~ 65 / Q --~ p ~ Z '.3, 2. " +-} D ( f-+ t 7 3 ) ( "2-P\ /-z ) -= 4'; r I L<' (. P-e-,N\ l;l,r'> 'v <-'.:> ~-='7• C9 if CD (PM~ F-s-) (2--; 2-o '1, yvl -... '2,-Q () ' t; I "' , .,A-v, --t '1 ~ fv1,1 ii,. J ·" . D,.. YJ, '-. -:;:. Cit"\ '2,.._ . e,ET, f ~ ~4 k, f-L o ( l i f-+'f) l 7/2_ ) ~ l f(Zv"" vv '1.,/ x-'-"2.. f.---\4--~ lr1-) ~ I +o .c_ k, · . . -2,-4:--! . - :t r'::t _ -:.. '1..-1 b , '"" 4- ~-;_ !ll7t 52?) ~ b 7 7 tt f-:, l I ( 731 :.>-V) (_ 41/'1,) "'7" --Z.. -: I (p, ~~ (') . k qvL -: l ~ , 1,. · rz~--~" 4~ ,.,, TY/ --Z\. (c::, "f... 1-1. v' a.i. -iJf . ~ '3b,, ,.,,_ ..i VVll!7 '7f1>r1 -:.. '2-1,f> ( 1;· w l ~'-f f-•t .. 81 z, Lh°6 vv l ~ ~ 4o ______ , F ~-~ Ber, .(I)~ (f),,,.Q __ 2-J 1 I-:. (o ( k4-+7J )(~~)-~ 11 ~. F-to T-A r-;. 15(..i.o) --~->u ~2-· :, L-,c..... ~ 4--4-f?.:.C: 4 k__--; '2-2,{' 4-..-\l."'i ... YYI --\ l 9 I',,"' · ~l, . f ,6.. ~ I.. : -0, 4 '' . . - U1~ v-1 l8)( 4-v -·v/\?t<v~--... I ~s + -~ -. ..L -.,,. C:, ,-z;_-I -t,,,. 4 J-.... I( --~4T - ~- ' , 1' . I., . 'I . , l O .. I ', C --,7z_ r t . l D T(lrl, J t· ;, S' ~ I ' l4- I ITf~il~ t,;,~,-Jf) -'-<JiA'? · _ :_ -~:-tEeA-~-~ _ s~l: 01-Cb ~T G~Ci~ --_, - ·~ ~~ci-?)(t1-) "'"3-z SL rs-/. ·. I f-: . ~-: '.? -(_~) (~I Fs-t) ( ~/z;) _ ~ Z-i-i 4 h HpROWITZ TAYLOR ENGINEERING 3914 MURPHY CANYON RD. #AlOO SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-4383 FAX (619) 560-8842 TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL-PANEL STRIP DESIGN Description: Wall Data Vertical = 14.00 ft Uniform Dead Load = 0.00 ft Uniform Live Load Loads = = Title: Scope: Job#: Design_er: Misc: Date: 08/11/98 Page: Lateral Loads 910.0 # Point Lateral Load = 728.0 # 1300.0 # ... Height from Base = 12.50ft Wall Height Parapet Height Thickness Rebar Size Rebar Spacing Wall: Z!Cp Parapet: ZICp = 7.25 in ..... Ecc. = 5.50 in (this is a Wind Load) # 6 (this is a Wind Load) Uniform Lateral Load = O.Oplf Min. Allow Defl Ratio Fixity% Used@ Base Seismic Zone = = = = = = 19.00 in 0.300 0".300 15Q.OOO 0.0 % 4 Material Data Concentric Dead Load = Concentric Live Load = Concrete Weight = 6400.0 # Di stan·ce to Bottom = 0.00ft 0.0 # Distance to Top = 0.00ft (this 'is a Wind Load) 150.000 pcf Wind Load = 52.00 psf Summary f'c = 3000 psi -----Using: UBC Sec. 2614(i) method ... Exact, Non-Iterat'ed ----- Fy Phi Min. Vert Steel% Min. Vert Steel% = 60000 psi = 0.90 = 0.0020 % = 0.0012 % M-n * Phi : Moment Capacity Applied: Mu@ Mid-Height Mu@ Top of Wall Max. Vertical Spacing = 18.00 in Allow Axial Stress Max. Horizontal = 18.00 in Actual Axial Stress 'd' : Depth To Steel = 5.75 in Max. As %: 0.6 * RhoBal @.0128 % Wall Weight = 90.63 psf Maximum Service Deflection Effective Strip Width = 36.00 in Ht/Service Defl Ratio Live Load Doesn't act w/Short Term Seismic Parapet Wt Used Space bars@ base of parapet at = = = = = Seismic 437876.4 in-# 123960.4 in-# 21020.2 in-# 120. 0 psi 91.3 psi 0.0048 % 0.054 in 3104 :1 = 18.0 in Wind 401955.3 in-# 104735.6 in-# 15765 .1 in-# 120.0 psi 91.3 psi 0.0048 0.046 in 3655 :1 18.0in Factored Load Stresses Service Load Deflections Seismic Wind Basic Defl. w/o P-Delta = 0.065 in 0.056 in Basic Defl. w/o P-Delta = Basic Moment w/o P-Delta = Moment in Excess of Mer = Max. Iterated Deflection= Basic Mu w/o P-Delta = 82365.9 in-# 66615.1 in-# Moment in Excess of Mer = 123960.4 in-#104735.6 in-# Max. Iterated Deflection = 1.437 in 1.527 in Max. Iterated Moment = 123960.4 in-#104735.6 in-# Max. Iterated Moment = ------------Analysis Values --Load Factors Used -- AC! 9-1 & 9-2 DL = 1.40 E :57,000*(f1c·.5) = 3122019 psi s-gross AC! 9-1 & 9-2 LL = 1 . 70 n : 29,000/Ec = 9.29 Mer= S * Fr AC! 9-1 & 9-2 ST = 1. 70 Fr: 5 * (f1c·_5) = 273.86 psi Rho balanced .... Seismic= ST = 1.10 Ht / Thk Ratio = 23.17 Seismic AC! 9-2 Group Factor = 0. 75 As(eff) = [ Pu:tot + (As*Fy) J / Fy= 1.546 in2 AC! 9-3 Dead Load Fact = 0. 90 'a' = (As*Fy + Pu) /(.85*f' c*12) = 1.011 in AC! 9-3 Short Term = .1.30 ' c '= 1 a 1 / • 85 1 . 189 in UBC 2625(c)4 "1.4" Facter '.1.40 Moment of Inertia Modification Facter 1.00 Seismic 0.047 in 58832.8 in-# 81466. 7 in-# 0.054 in 81466. 7 in-# = Wind 0.045 in 53678.0 in-# 80247.2 in-# 0.046 in 80247.2 in-# 315.4 in·3 86369. O in-# 0.0214 Wind 1.407 in2 0. 920 in 1.082 in UBC 2625(c)4 110.911 Facter 0.90 I-gross = 1143.2 in·4 1.00 1143.2 in·4 300.0 in·4 0.0 in·4 0.90 446617 in-# I-cracked = 318. 9 in·4 I-effective (ACI) = Phi : Capacity Reduction Factor = Mn= As(eff) * Fy * ( d -a/2) = Software (c) 1983-94 ENERCALC Engineering Software 0.0 in·4 0.90 486529 in-# Licensed to: SRN: ~ p~Nl:1... ~Pf'O/µf~ c;,((i()e:::--,Z-/->1-:.ir-.1c., . l--( N~ 'f3? R,.L. ~ 3 o( Ls) ( '1-7-.)-::. t,sv ,b 2-- ~ 2'o ( l_~) (~) ~ 52.80 _ lio . f~NC.., f).1.., . . . -::,._ 3(91) ( ~/2) ~-~ ~ _:I +>~c ,~ t ~( 91)(1:1) ~ 1,~ 11 ,AL-L-u~ 4'>(14.,~ :~~ ,o~P ~ --~-== . ii;~-~,' . ( I~ 7?S., -.: :~. C, .. -----~-- ------ I t, use 9 ~ ·7J,t1L--·f ,t>NtG1.. . Ae ..:[ q f -¾) (?,,,,.;) --: -:::-C[{o ptti (12<> PS.,' o ... ~ ... g_j@J~. Z. -:;..O, 4 I-;_\. o C ~ 2 .. 75 ~-{c;? w = T~@i. ;)[S\~. ~D ' WI('!;?'• Po:= Ce..Lf0s1 ;;; \ '2.-f-> f-. e f ...... vJ,. L.. -I . . .. -j'-, ~;,,;;,,. fv• of~:.,~J : ·-!.:...--========'I p_ . . .. v -r( ~-(2-_:+l;) 1~};c(9°)~:·10Jk~-_ -1 Pi-:;.(~-i 14) 1ar~l(('='.:;'),;.l1G::>U,-Ii f [ C L w, ;; (: .;:-1 ¾ ) "'I l-r_,.~ x<. -r t .. s-(__ '2,; ,,.,Jj-,. ;,-0 '-4 ~/ ----·-------------------------.. --- w 7-~~ + _1%) 4_--!_r°::>~ -_Xl..-t-__ c.fQ_' ( 'Zarc~---3 ~¼ l7 , ~v{)_. . } fi == (5 ( 1 o r~f )( 1-0) -.. crs-K-. . • k.. P1.--__ , s ( 10 p1f) (t ~.s )-.. l7p VV 1 , ~f ~ t) ~ I ps-f x'?.. -\-l ... ;..(_ "?p>f) ~ 1 3/, IN.,_ ~ I 4: ,;-( __ 4 ( r• +) ;n. + "to' ( ~Hs:<) -: 8. 1:,;; $-nJf'1 f2tn,r- ~() fi.., .. t/.. WttJO h ~ l 4- .. : W 1 (1/,) ·lA.J t.__ ~ l45 I~ w2. w~ 3.~2,. fu~ z$•7 -Ll~~ 1._ ·/I ,.<ti, "2-'i I_,~ . ... . ~- .44- ~ (:C , .47 . ; J;; L-'- l/\( >-EH. ~ ,18.? \/4F x Lw 1.4-57 ~ i.e:A-/, w?,. c;c='IJ. -;:::.. I I ~ ? .( £!::- ~-\ I. lr\h1/,' r ~ 4 .(· Jere,J --s-l l ~ 1,-(17--y.sf)( ~ \ _ r . I+) >85, ~c-Y::.r. ,'2,.g . 1+ ----------- W· 2-'?t-CJC)/2-;::... t 5' (_f '2.-) --=. l 5} Q I~ / ) l~ Q (4'1 ~M ~ ,.Jc=:· (u = C¥ -~c 14-J J.:1,,, = -,4 9-4' / -( I , . ,,, L\J € Yz_ S1Lvc::.. r . -'f(oJ -'4)3'' -----------\/ >i I rw--:-,;-bB c 1/ / I t, LJ.)c 4 Wvc...r-os.,~ /(o l ;::::) ~l• \Pr N1 -~-=---------- \. 4-S ( '/,) 7'° {b!,,,---, ):?s:: u>c'c J-'2. 's'f/Wc .I 6 >1? -~('oJ-:)4 1 ' ·~vP -=- 1:::-f' ::: '2-L 4 w 1? == c,, t-C, . o) (, '7..s) 1 ! p:; -f :::: 2 7, 3 rs L kl>p -=-1., 1, ~ ( l 1) ( 8 · ~ ) ~ z. B 1... 1 l;/ 14 " ~ S{) ,-( N (., ~'::>C 1-0 ~ Y'\ l t, H-f.:>~ (~ ~ ~Q_, 9:, L,, / , . I -; U,~ 'PAZ-8 Pcu_ ~ -=-= 7 C:. e~ IL, = ~,(::_ J1--; * I _,; k;;;, ~ 0, I'-' 17 ~ Tu~ :: ::, -:3 ~A-r ~ -1_;, ·, ---· L_ __ UJE:_ · N:>ttt ~~~~ C -_·{ --\ ~1 ( l (..~x) -;-C(o -'3 I, t) k. As 'y~'J-= ~,. f, ~ l, l 8 ,1r ~ 31.. LS- ('· $-c:::¥"" tp, l-'2.-- _ ,lb;> l»px = .[b"'c a, ?C) --1.niy · ;,:;· I _ [ ( -J I 7 :::,f+eA.{2.. 0 Cp J-~,-,, E'-,n? -::· I, ~2. (. -¥ -~ (1,.:$'2-)] :4-80 -; l, ~ 1 0-.~- ---~---_:_::-l ~ :4~('>--6) ( l ~1)· . ·-z.->( w ll)'(lf-. --- le--11, &; M, INfi _ 1.5i-( i¾) __ \' \ T = . ~' 11-. 7--0,: ~-\oS"" ~ I.. N,~ . (j. J£-; ,;::::::::-~_ -=----:::~::::::===- VV'-U,.,,..· ';:) J;.-... b ... . ; "'· . i l ._:,i.: (' i.;~)(k>t) ,_ ,. >~( i;.91,_ -. .:,o 1?'. : ' ' . T .. -; .S.~1;/4/ . __ (.&1, s-: {i r __ (oL ___ . 4-:.J± /r;, 'l ~ · ·b(.1b)(,,P1 I ']'7 "2. -r ,,~~ -.. :.; '::>, .J. u~ic: v<J, '2-x I+- A--:.. 411 Ga ,,,,_i \-~. (_'2.-t, xr'v} -.... ?Jo fj .oo / Ix ~ S, o(.p 1 $~St,'°' / < \, '?'; t> 'I-. ' O,k-. fr.KIA'--'-<,,::,.p-=--\o2~ \".-1/r-~ . '·" (__ ,z.,,~ ,,., y S·?Jb --Z "! _..c> ~ ~ -zo i.--,; / fe-~ \ 17 . .>'bk,,,; .C'..___ .;_: t 03/t~, 7 --~. t ~-/ £ --vY'-/4,<. .... ~. & c.,"'X1, ---i1. 7 ~\, / ~ ... _ z4-~ ,' -R--/F~ k-C-n, . .__ o, ,1 -t o,91~ -; \. 'l..s" < \.~ ~ . (1~%') ~ ~ ; -G_ --, i ~ -t o. 9 ---I , I§ < (. ~'?? '0 r; fb r.) ,(/ ' o,~. -n=l,Ac:>12,, >- 1-t' ~=_:~ 1X .·~ ---------- x ~IT !Ir [[J~l·zr: .~ =i- -I , It 4 I r I i I ,, r I , ,-, •, 1· I -' 1,s-' A' ' " 1 . ;t' r t' * . ~ ~ ~t) -4 ·? ---~ ·--2--0 -4-· p · ~ -U -4 · ~I ,b I . - P,,ta::-t!.-VS~-DF:. .. ..>YfY' L .. /f:if!:-_~ __ (?.<~, Q_tf{ /VIIA-~;_? _ _M 1? --~~ .0' 131.-1// fo..c.CEpe-N""-P 1...--~. ·:-=-· . 0$ (-l."=:.~ .J .... _ 8, 24"- f~ L~ -~ l,t~(T~i)~-lcil_,4-Lc-, ---··· IZ- '\7J'T,>C.... fuve2--1-.-,.,.,.-i,::: /_oS'.? . ~"1 t O I Ti or-~'--~ 0 -eNT(l.;C; w-b1-t... vt/1 "=' .::14:. ~, ,-4--;7-?' Ac:::: -o • I 1:1' ~ i eL,,<>AI 2-~ I? / / (7,. '2-t' 3'~ i:::i...uc.-lZ-- ~1.-to 5-r<uf ;J1-,_ )',J?1' --'7,'?7+4 =-> j,.f-:: • I oG, /::::. fltc.-t2. .:i:-¼ -;. ½ --1,4 :=? ~F--'b,4-/ ;, .A-~1,e(l-1I ·yJ__ ~½ ";. .. ~> .A ) 2-. ~'? Ii q <a4-. F - -... --·~ ~-__ " ___ " __ - 0 .. l j f:"__ I I O ~ -t -'--~' 2.._ . -= CD, ~ L.Z. =-'/· ~ ~ .t.,-2. 7- f2t '-1-l IJl r{ c::;J/==-· w---.o·e--1..·· . ·0! .. ~ . . ~ 0~ ----~~~-~~~----2-~o __ E~~---~ --~~ _. o/' l ~-i ;I u,. 9J ,. p. 53:~~~-' A"'_-,.-: u 'l, . ·7~t_°. --<;~ti·:·n._--_)t~_-,? __ :; ~~-:f7 -_-::e> fie·:~ ._~BJ,.:. _D. _?(~ IL\-~--.. o/J ~_4t _~ 9~ _t3 .~? ~--~ i--1 ~-~,--_: . f.::> Pl ~-(i.f-~ .. t .. ----·· ~ --6 ,_ -64~ ~, I •G.' ':+~ii -~ J 6 Pll--c.i.. --~.2-L; -.·,a ~-+6~-B4£::= .,G; b 'o-"> t2.---t f.·+.--~ (2{0 < DI 'if O ,~ ~h":'-0 . --. ""::i ·8"n <L£ v,//>1/4.--1 ~ -.. 1 o/' -z.,, » ·-o. 4 7 7 ~:> b ~ -. , 1 ht >l.A-rv S'1P-tl",, W/J. --7./,z..'f.?'7:::=, '2.'p!/; _..=:.> l:::. F ~ •0 7} L '-t r-J(.}(/.A£ 1ri1> {? ~ ~t::' 'l..... • Ll:Y b l't,i..::---fZ-JlT --\ r q ~ d-( $/>--f'."~ />;, . i c:::"Fv~) ,:_..-:> \2-.~ I sf ~ 11 , ie;..yi. .:W 1 ~ -;: /4 --I, I y, =:::> /4,-=-.;::. . sz,4 ~ (2---1.9 g ~p1~ -:.. · 1./\ / ~ -~ r/ ~--~-0 iv -~-- "-Ai..-t... __ ~_ = . e/ -,... 0, 4--) ' -L IJ -~ ~<-@ ~ P Ptc-rl-li-~ ~ ~ (\IL,??) ~ '2-~~ 7 1. .::::, [-:,~-0 r> Pl ~fl rsL .::. I l t:~ --irt ,-1 ~ .t ~, C.0 . f,_ '"· ~ ?,' ( 'S:r.si)t Z~,{ )--r & ('1 I )(Z0~3) -i-:) (__!0(~3 )t-? (!!]~I~' __ . __ . _ _ _ --~~':'.:'_ ____ _ _ Jc1y~ _ _ _ .Lev.., .. ---,., ... ._. .:_ -- IL. .;; 2 g __ l · to'z;) R .. ,, v,~ -;_ t: _ 4-c-r:::-z-~-V ;,; i,:1. i-l<- v~ ~ It 4-(_·itz_/)~ ·; : __ ~)~& . .., -- .q ~ \, ~s-s ==-is-~i' - OL ~ A ~ ::. . 8~ (-1s-) ,, r <i~ ,p~ ./:::; I ~ (':?) (~.-s') 11""' • '2.-~ \<Y'\py -== A ½ ( J__ /2..J ~ ,gg( 1S) (34--:;;) =-7.·/52 . -L7 CP£._e:-(V\f::;,~, _~>< i~L-.:.f" M.¢~. ~l..t '(14--· '2 (3,r.:>L.-,M... NC--(£ >~ i-J ~ e,, ---==-• o6'2-~ ~ t.::.~ ;;.; / C. !4~d_ ( r Q a~) c ~ o '"'wJ-rrCJiJ,J \, .q_ ~ p, c... "; . ~l ~ .s. ~ I -• Cl,.:,'?, ( C -d t ) ;: r O o--Z.. ~ 1 s c? = • &~ f' :_ b -=-?-i->'" 1 Cs ~ ~~ _Gs' ___ ~.Ss-~~ )-A ~ -~-!::?' ~ . ... -.. ---t,.. ·-'· . ·•-. T-:-£j A -_;_ 7.s-(, fJS)---0 ~ .... ~ -; C_~ ~ c;:--s -.r ~ -251_. --- M _ ( 9..,-.;; ·_ · -"---· ··-· ( ~ --·· 1 \. . .J _ --~w . . b -~-(i------7--.;:·--·1: /-~---c:_1--· -·--;-·-;;:-·-J 7-~-T (.... ---~ ) ::::.-4~ g·~1r-l'-· . ··. -: . . . . -··-----···· ...... . . ' -·. Po--. &s r: ( Az ~ A)+t,/ls -7-~ . --···-. . .... --.......... ·. -·--·-... ,.."7, • 0 :k ( '?J (•"{!, -s).:. ,fH r.~ -1-,. >£{,:,•X.44) (f-) , 7 i S ·18C/;) ~' M~ 1..57 ;;1 4-?_b4_ . .),, . ,., L7 'f J Pt- Ve. yv\p,,-, -t t'v1p.,'1. . Mfr-1 -= -it- r-i.. (._ 31 &; ) ~ .=. l ~-~ :::= 1({v) -Ve_ ~ \f_c --~/J,.Gv_;-;z · --~-?_f,~~ · f-.._; +C/4o = 3S-, \ ,..., (f' ... ~ '.': -r~ - . ...,. ' . . ' -. ___ ,,.._ ,_ :-• --- ,: - \' -.-· J ·- .• . • • ..,I i_ . :; -- • ,..J • ., --rV\ -'.> "2. '' A~ = .012.1 ,, 6..-4:;. ·· = 2-. \ ~~~ ) Lle ·--. . . -- ~7 ; . I r:J_{-): b €. \__ t'}\~ . · I . t . . __ C~ _· __ V"\"' ___ ?. .:P"'-----=-I, 2.J::> __ ;-_~_:?.'L .. -t _i.:= (e::.. ------.. :.~--~--7,12. (·-z..-~·,1) +-o + ··s 4-. -~'? =-t I 2., ~. ~\.IM{;:. 6._t ) , ~,.:>'-lr-o-:J - -b;_ ==-,.. CJu l .;;- . C::<-" '<-s ( ? ) [ : i-5 c_;_ ( I '2 ) '-• £ _ ' ~ t l := I .f, C, C~ -'1, i, + C) =--o . Is ~ , ~ t ( c.~) t , ~ g ( . (; o L :;-) ( z..cz_ « lo":?) -=-9' I '""-• . .., . ... \. f ~ t-C.s -T; -= l 12, e, I l<.oJ G.._ -2..2 4 + o-"I I = I 12. f1 --::. c....,__ ::c. /,'Z..1 ~ ~{Zp\~ !, ~-~ t-> ~ '7 V rt>b '"'(,) L '2-1-I. § '6 =:> c, I 0o 4--G:, / I CJ O rz..~J ----':. 4 (I,? I -,00"'6 ,G, -= I, z;z. ,._ ~z. , t:Jo I 4-,"'\,, 00 tS' 0~1'-,, . ;..:::.· -;? = . . ---i? ,..~~'? £,__ 1 •-I .,.. Cc....·=-1/22 ,.,,. ~ C. '" =-I 1'2 ,9 . ,, 'n, .:: . 88, (, c,"'I +) ( '2-ci )( I c>) = ,-_,;-, 7 ~· r< .~ [ u '2-. 9 (1,s -· ~ ~~ ) )-r _. Br, (bo) (1.3/7')] --1 & t° I I 6e_ ~ tO"'Z..1-- . . " · A. [ ~ C:.t -/:::. '! = < o,.__8 \ 11 -~O I ,.... -;:... lb -,__,. ')v-.,v -;:.. \' ..::::> ; : ' {Y\A~,. ~ft\('4::77~ O'T"Pf:-11-J / '2.,6 ~ C.: ¢,f;_, =,. Clo ~3> ~ •"''-' 7 • .-·,. c7ovr-J'O, vY'lt'M'?~ No, ~1p 0 .. k_, ,_ t ~~/ _. Ii::; -~ {\ / b I i.,.. ·_;.: , s-1 ; '2- ---. -----. ---' .l . . . -----· -----------,---· . ...: ..;---"------------ -AGv · Y ./~ · · · -=-· · 2-0~-G "' ' : . . • . , 1-: .. <?, T' f"\. ;; 81.~ ( ~-;;:i) ("'4) r ~ \2-:) tM,4-(1+) t-'~(7) 3 ;·_ 260[.(. C. r,_ L --~~. r~-· ; .... Ji f?.f (21-)'i);:_?J~) ____ .if] 1'7 ( '-~i)--~ ~ Js 4--~ .- ,~........ . "2,. -. -~--~-- N'~ --~"-~ .. s: ~-1, __ C:, . --. . . ;; 4' 7. ~ .. -. -~ U.P~I IT--==--·. . --~ ~.bf' . .Ss- ~ -~ ~ to ADJp,.~----wi ,p />,-r-J =-7-'7 9 ~<>'\.... ~ . Fz.._o ~ ¢- P-Dc22u~r:t;:: B:> -( 1 ,J->fc--~7 otJ --·. j _; . ---:. 4 1! N~--,,,,. ~ ~ ~ --; ·. · k.. ( >~ti-r. · ~ ~ .. 4 · -· · · ·· · · · ' ·· .. ··-·:-...... ---........... __ ) ... ·-·-·-· .. ·--·----·---···-·-··--·· ·-··-··· ··-· . ·-··---···---....... --------..... -... -·-· .. ·-.. --. ·-·---··--·-·-·-----·-··---- .... -·• .. ---··-······-·· .. ··-·-· --------·--··· ---·-1,.e.·------···-···· ··---·-· ................. -······ ... VIA .-... J ... 1:._(9,J?,).t.i,7.C±.1/-~ .\2.,0 ·~-··-.. -··---····· _ ·-·· ... -······- . -,"~"' _ N;:: ;_ q, 1--'i. =' :_i s 2-'"'Clk."s .~~ , .'.3.-+li~; f 5 ':') -==-.,,,,.......,, . .. .... ---··V<. --.... . -..... -----------... t.,-... ---·----..... ._ . -. -------.... ... --·-· Y"--=-·--·-:--/rf = .. l~-·-..,-l-4.J3_. __________ -----· ---· ............... .. .. -·---'·----· -.. --.. -------· --· .. -.:.?>.;;;.,_. _______ ... _. ___ ._ .......... --·-···· ~ . . .. --'Y~···-;. 0c-z;; f ·-----·-o. (o ·lu-7: ...... ---·--'·-.--·-·-··--·--·---.......... . . -------._ ---_:-:-___ ~----------·----------------___ ;;_ ___ -•------·--------. ----~ -------- ~ol :r;l -:;: .t 4-rt, -·-. ·:· ~. '2. I_I. ·--.. . . . _____ __ ........ --/2-.(,e:..J--· ---·-... ·-· --···-·. us£ ···· h-=--; 12.-'"' · ;· -· i ~ --··-··t --· ·---~ T1~ -~---~:;= ~· --tc:/' . ---· . . . -. . .. . ..... . . . . .... ..'2----. . .. .. ... ------------------,~ --- M"'---, l 1., b(.± )t .-5' ( 'J::: ) -:--.5 l " ("'v A v .f. -= ~ -.1 4-.-~ -5 f-~ ( \, 4-) ~ 0,\7<- I '2.,. ff,- -i--;:.:. -. I IW_.._. As;. ~p b) ...... e;,, I~ \ ¼ ~ _,_ -A+· ~-··o .·1 c; ·· -----·----· -;;:~--~---~--Av+ 1 _A.VJ.· ..... -::. .. ~----(-: I-;~ s-;~:~~t · -~ 0., 2-'2. I 1~'2- I "l,... .l~ . • Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way' • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 September 13, 1999 W.O. 2474-8-SC The Blackmore Company 1530 Faraday Avenue, Suite 170 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention Ms. Colleen Blackmore Subject: Interim Compaction Report, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 98, Carlsbad, California References: 1. "Plan Review, Lot 98, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California," W.O. 2474-A-SC, dated October 15, 1998, by GeoSoils, Inc. Gentlemen, 2. "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California," W.O. 2474-A-SC, dated August 3, 1998, by GeoSoils, Inc. Grading and processing of original ground within the building pad areas for the subject lots was observed and selectively tested by a representative of GeoSoils, Inc. during the earthwork phase of development for the subject property. The work performed to date is in general conformance with the recommendations contained in our referenced report (see reference list), and with the grading ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, California. Field testing indicates that fills placed under the purview of this report have been compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. A final compaction report of rough grading and improvements construction, including observations and testing results for rough grading, utilities and driveway/parking areas, is forthcoming. Since our study is based upon observations and selective testing, the conclusions presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GeoSoils, Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. RGC/DWS/mo Distribution: (2) Addressee (1) Reno Contracting, Mr. Bill Becket The Blackmore Company Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 98 File:e:\wp7\2400\2474b.icr GeoSoils, Ine. W.O. 2474-8-SC September 13, 1999 Page2 n ,r ' • Geotechnical • Geologic• Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 The Blackmore Company 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 440 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Mr. Allen Blackmore October 15, 1998 W.O. 2474-A-SC Subject: Plan Review, Lot 98, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In accordance with a recfuest from Smith Consulting Architects, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has performed a review of the grading plans (Sheets 1 through 3) prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, and the foundation plans (Sheets S1, S2, S3 and SD1) prepared by Horowitz Taylor Engineering (see Appendix}, for the proposed Lot 98 project. The plans reviewed appear to be in _general conformance with the recommendations provided by this office and presented in GSI (1998), with the following comments and/or additional recommendations. Grading Plans • Work to be Done, Note #6 shown on Sheet 1, refers to soils report and recommendations by Geocon, Inc. (our underline). This note should be revised to -reflect the proper geotechnical engineer of record. Foundation Plans , • Foundation Note #3 shown on Sheet S1 indicates that footing shall be "18 inches below natural grade" and "18 inches below finish grade." A review of our referenced report (GSI, 1998) indicates that footings should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches and 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade for continuous and square footings, respectively. All foundations should be embedded into either properly compacted fill or suitable bedrock material. • Note on foundation plan (Sheet 3) indicates #4 reinforcing bar placed 24 inches on center, each way, within the concrete floor slab. GSI (1998) recommends that slab reinforcement consist of #3 reinforcing bar placed 18 inches on center, each way, within the concrete slab. GSI also recommends that the structural engineer review and comment on the plan reinforcement with respect to recommendations presented in GSI (1998). Limitations Since our study is based upon the site materials and conditions observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusion and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. i The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. ~G-;- Robert G. Crisman Project Geologist, .CEG Distribution: .(1) Addressee (3) Smith Consulting Architects, Attn: Sandy Gramley The Blackmore Company Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 98 File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.prl GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2474-A-SC October 15, 1998 Page 2 . ' APPENDIX REFERENCES GeoSoils, Inc., 1998, Preliminary geotechnical evaluation, Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California," W.O. 2474-A-SC, dated August 3. · Horowitz Taylor Engineering, 1998, Foundation plan, Lot 98, Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California (Sheets 81, 82, S3 and S01), dated August 26. San Dieguito Engineering, 1998, Preliminary grading plan for Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 98 (Sheets 1 through 3), undated. GeoSoils, Inc. I:._ "" 1---~-- "'I ·I .• "I -1··_ ~-,., 1: I I. 1·· I 1·· 1· 1·-. I I I -t1 !,, •. I I -. -.·· .... ,--;.', . ,- ' ::~, Geotechnical • Geologic O Environmental ·'· -··-~-1-· ...... ·1.·. 1-, ... I:_ .... ... _. ~-. -.. ~ ·_I···: .... .~. ''· .• ··. · .. , :,,. -. ··'·· . ·c.-.; .,.,· ... . ;-' . ,. :, '~ .. . •. i,r,,_ ... ' .• . ~, . ... '._, •r._..~ · • 7 .. :· .. · . ...... :,. ··--·.,· ~ I l •• . ',· ,; ! ';" ... \. '. .. ~.,.:~~:-.~ .. -:· ... _. .... .. -. . .. . •:,. I 1 •• _ ·' ,,.·.• . . ·,. . . . . ,:• "- • •. .. ~ .. ,:'. •. -: . .1: . ·,, ....... :. if,.•.- >. •r ··- ··-· •' -~~' -: ' ..... ,•. .. -. . ' ','(.•t. -,. ....... : . ,- . l I.. ' • • .... :,. · .. ' : . ~ .· :.::~ ··:· ~-~ .. ..._. ~ . .. ,. I: I ,, I I· I 1· I 1- I· 1· I I I I. ~ 1·· 1·. 1- 1 • Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760) 438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 August 3, 1998 W.O. 2474-A-SC The Blackmore Company 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 440 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Subject: Dear Sir: Mr. Allen Blackmore Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California. In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has performed a preliminary geotechnical evaluation regarding proposed construction on Lot 98 within the Carlsbad Research Center. The purpose of our study was to provide a site specific evaluation of earth materials underlying the site and to provide preliminary recommendations for site preparation, earthwork construction, and foundation design/construction, based on our findings. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Based on our review of the available data (Appendix A), field exploration, laboratory testing, and geologic and engineering analysis, the proposed development appears to be feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint, provided the recommendations presented in the text of this report are properly incorporated into the design and construction of the project. The most significant elements of this study are summarized below: • Due to the desiccated and relatively soft/loose condition of the soils within 1 to 2 feet of existing grade, within the proposed building footprint and parking/driveway areas, these materials should be removed, moisture conditioned, and recompacted and/or processed in place. • Overexcavation of formational materials is recommended to a minimum depth of 5 feet below pad grade, within areas proposed for settlement-sensitive improvements, for mitigation of transition conditions. I I I I· I· I· I· I I· I I I I I I • Soils with a medium expansion potential exist onsite. Soils with a high expansion potential also may be encountered during grading. • The site materials have a moderate sulfate exposure for corrosion to concrete. • Subsurface and surface water are not anticipated to affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated into the construction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along fill/bedrock contacts and along zones of contrasting permeabilities should not be precluded from occurring in the future due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities. • The seismicity acceleration values provided herein should be considered during the design of the proposed development. • The geotechnical design parameters provided herein should be considered during project planning design and construction by the project structural engineer and/or architects. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File:e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge J./.tv. David W. Skelly Civil Engineer, R GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page Two I: I I 1- ~:i}! I I 1· 1- 1, 1- 1· I I I I I I --~ I I TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................... 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................... 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 1 FIELD EXPLORATION .................................................... 3 EARTH MATERIALS ...................................................... 3 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol -Af) ........................................ 3 Santiago Formation (Map Symbol -Tse) ................................ 3 GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ...................................... 3 FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY ..................................... 5 Faulting .......................................................... 5 Seismicity ........................................................ 5 Seismic Shaking Parameters ......................................... 5 GROUNDWATER ........................................................ 6 LIQUEFACTION ......................................................... 6 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................. 7 Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Laboratory Standard ...... : ......................................... 7 Expansion Index Testing ............................................ 7 Shear Testing ..................................................... 8 Soluble Sulfates ................................................... 8 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................... 8 General .......................................................... a Earth Materials/Depth to Competent Bearing Materials .................... 9 Expansion Potential ................................................ 9 Corrosion Potential ................................................. 9 Subsurface and Surface Water ....................................... 9 Regional Seismic Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS ....................... 10 General ......................................................... 10 Site Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Removals (Unsuitable Surfacial Materials) ............................. 11 Overexcavation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Fill Placement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 GeoSails, ·lne. I I I I: >t:-;-1:i 1· 1· I I I' I I I· I I 1·. 1· I I· I FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 12 Recommenciations for Concrete 11Tilt-up" Structures ..................... 12 Design .......................................................... 13 Bearing Value .............................................. 13 Lateral Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Foundation Settlement -Structural Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 FLOOR SLAB DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 14 Light Load Floor Slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Heavy Load Floor Slabs ............................................ 15 Subgrade Preparation ............................................. 16 Moisture Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 CORROSION AND CONCRETE MIX ........................................ 16 RETAINING WALL RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 16 General ......................................................... 16 Restrained Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Loading Dock Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Other Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 17 Cantilevered Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Wall Backfill and Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Retaining Wall Footing Transitions ................................... 22 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ....................................... 22 PCC Pavement Joints .............................................. 24 Weakened Plane Joints ....................................... 24 Expansion Joints ............................................ 24 Contact Joints .............................................. 24 Slab Reinforcement ............................................... 24 FLATWORK AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ............................ 25 Tile Flooring ..................................................... 25 Gutters and Downspouts ........................................... 26 Exterior Slabs and Walkways ........................................ 26 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS/DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ................ 27 Additional Site Improvements ....................................... 27 Erosion and Sedimentation Control .................................. 27 Landscape Maintenance and Planting ................................ 27 Drainage ........................................................ 28 Footing Trench Excavation ......................................... 28 Trench Backfill ................................................... 29 The Blackmore Company File:e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. Table of Contents Page ii I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I PLAN REVIEW ......................................................... 29 LIMITATIONS .......................................................... 29 FIGURES: Figure 1 -Site Location Map .................................... 2 Figure 2 -California Fault Map .................................. 4 Figure 3 -Site Wall Drain Option A .............................. 19 Figure 4 -Site Wall Drain Option B .............................. 20 Figure 5 -Site Wall Drain Option C .............................. 21 ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A -References .............................. Rear of Text Appendix B -Boring Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rear of Text Appendix C -Laboratory Test Results ................... Rear of Text Appendix D -General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines ... Rear of Text Appendix E -Pavement Grading Guidelines .............. Rear of Text Plate 1 -Geotechnical Map .................... Rear of Text in Pocket The Blackmore Company File:e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. Table of Contents Page iii 1. I· 1, 1·, -~-~:/ I 1· I 1- 1· 1· ,. -.~ I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOT 98, CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of our services has included the following: 1. Review of readily available soils and geologic data (Appendix A). 2. Geologic site reconnaissance. 3. Subsurface exploration consisting of three hollow-stem-auger borings using a truck mounted drill rig. 4. Laboratory testing of representative soil samples collected during our subsurface exploration program. 5. Appropriate engineering and geologic analysis of data collected and preparation of this report. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site consists of Lot 98 within Unit 5 of the Carlsbad Research Center development in Carlsbad, California. The site is bounded on the south by Faraday Avenue, on the east by Lot 97, on the west by Lot 99, and on the north by undeveloped property (see Site Location Map, Figure 1). Unit 5 of the Carlsbad Research Center was graded in 1992 through 1994 under the observation and testing services of Geotechnics Incorporated (Geotechnics Incorporated, 1994). Our review of the grading plans indicates that the subject site is a transition lot that is underlain by the formational materials and shallow fill soils. The lot is relatively flat with drainage generally to the southwest. The site is sparsely vegetated with weeds and a landscaped greenbelt adjacent the streets. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is our understanding that the proposed development would consist of finish grading for proposed industrial construction and associated driveway, parking, underground utility, and landscape improvements. It is our understanding that the building will be a two-story structure, utilizing wood-frame, masonry-block, or concrete tilt-up construction with slab- on-grade floors. Building loads are assumed to be typical for this type of relatively light construction. GeoSoils, Ine. I: I I I I I I I I 1· I I I I I I ,, I ·---------_.,,, \ l§SITE l!l1 ,!. __ __ -.. ........ ,... c:, I I I I ( \ I I I ..., ,, I / I I I I ) ---.......... ,,.I' , .......... __ ., __ 1~ .... ...... ..... .,,..,,. ' ,,,/ / / ,- • I I SEE'.'f/ J(.Afl'Wtl, 2 ~A.l'il llj 1,,,.,,.14,1, j ~IH1'fl lo ---..... -~~-,---... _ --· I I Base Map: The Thomas Guide, San Diego County Street Guide and Directory, 1998 Edition, by Thomas Bros. Maps, page 1107 and 1127. 0 1/2 f5\ I Scale 1 Miles ~ N Reproduced with permission granted by Thomaa Stoa. Maps. This map is copyrighted by Thomaa Bros. Mapa. It I• unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether tor. personal use or resale, without permission. All rlghU reserved. w.o. 2474-A-SC SITE LOCATION MAP Figure 1 I I I I· 1- 1 I I I 1· I ,. I I I Typical cut and fill grading techniques are anticipated to construct the building pad to the desired graded configuration. Although grading plans for the project are not available at this time, we assume that finish grading will consist of grade changes not exceeding 2 feet. FIELD EXPLORATION Field studies conducted during our evaluation of the property for this study consisted of geologic reconnaissance mapping, and drilling of three hollow-stem-auger exploratory borings, for evaluation of near-surface soil and geologic conditions. The borings were logged by a geologist from our firm, who collected representative samples for laboratory testing. The logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. The locations of the borings are presented on Plate 1 . EARTH MATERIALS Earth materials encountered on the site consist of artificial fill and the Eocene-age Santiago Formation. Artificial Fill (Map Symbol -Af) Artificial fill underlies the southerly portion of the site (see Plate 1). The fill materials encountered onsite consist of olive brown, clayey silts. The fill materials generally were moist and soft and non-uniform in the upper 1 to 2 feet, and graded to very stiff at about 2 feet. Inasmuch as the fill materials were placed under the observation and testing services of Geotechnics Incorporated ( 1994), evaluation of the suitability of the fill materials was not part of our scope of services. Santiago Formation (Map Symbol -Tse) The Eocene-age Santiago Formation underlies the northerly portion of the site at the surface and underlies existing fill materials at depth. The formational materials encountered in our subsurface investigation generally consisted of highly oxidized, greenish brown, claystone and sandy siltstone. These soils generally were moist and very stiff. The expansion potential for materials of the Santiago Formation ranges from low to high. GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS The subject property has been evaluated previously (Geotechics Incorporated, 1994), and the previously described geologic and seismic conditions generally have not changed. Additional comments regarding site seismicity and secondary hazards are provided herein, as warranted. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page3 I: J I I I -w I I I I: I 1· I 1· ,~ I ·1.- -:__ .. :~ I I I I \ ~ ~ I SAN FRANCISCO SITE LOCATION ( + ): Latitude -33.1402 N Longitude -117 .2883 W Lot 98, CRC CALIFORNIA W.O. 2474-A-SC GeoSoils, Ine. 0 50 100 SCALE (Miles) Figure 2 I I I ,, ::.j_'.0 I I I I 1, I I -.. · I I I I c:.,, I I I I FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY Faulting The site is situated in an area of active as well as potentially-active faults. Our review indic~tes that there are no known active faults crossing the site within the areas proposed for development (Weber, 1992), and the site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart, 1997). There are a number of faults in the southern California area that are considered active and would have an effect on the site in the form of ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. These include--but are not limited to--the San Andreas fault, the San Jacinto fault, the Elsinore fault, the Coronado Bank fault zone, and the Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon fault zone. The location of these and other major faults relative to the site are indi,cated on Figure 2. The possibility of ground acceleration or shaking at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the southern California region as a whole. Seismicity The acceleration-attenuation relations of Joyner and Boore (1982), Campbell and Borzorgnia (1994), and Sadigh and others (1989) have been incorporated into EQFAUL T (Blake, 1996). For this study, peak horizontal ground accelerations anticipated at the site were determined based on the random mean plus 1 -sigma attenuation curves developed by Joyner and Boore (1982), Campbell and Borzorgnia (1994), and Sadigh and others {1987). These acceleration-attenuation relations have been incorporated in EQFAULT, a computer program by Thomas F. Blake (1996), which performs deterministic seismic hazard analyses using up to 150 digitized California faults as earthquake sources. The program estimates the closest distance between each fault and a user-specified file. If a fault is found to be within a user-selected radius, the program estimates peak horizontal ground acceleration that may occur at the site from the 11maximum credible11 and 11maximum probable11 earthquakes on that fault. Site acceleration (g) is computed by any of the 14 user-selected acceleration-attenuation relations that are contained in EQFAULT. Based on the above, peak horizontal ground accelerations from a maximum credible event may be on the order of 0.52 g to 0.62 g, and a maximum probable event may be on the order of 0.31 g to 0.35 g. Seismic Shaking Parameters Based on the site conditions, Chapter 16 of the Uniform Building Code (International Conference of Building Officials, 1997) and Peterson and others (1996), the following seismic parameters are provided. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Pages I I I I I I I I I I I 1_ I I I: .,J I- I I I Seismic zone (per Figure 16-2*) 4 Soil Profile Type (per Table 16-J*) Sa Joyner and Boore Subgrade Type Class A Seismic Source Type (per Table 16-U*) B Distance to Seismic Source 6 mi. (10 km) Upper Bound Earthquake Mw6.9 , * Figure and table references from Chapter 16 of the Uniform Building Code (1997). GROUNDWATER Subsurface water was not encountered within the property during field work performed in preparation of this report nor in any test excavations completed during the previous study (Geotechnics Incorporated, 1994). However, seepage may occur locally (due to heavy precipitation or irrigation) in areas where fill soils overlie silty or clayey soils. Such a condition would likely occur where more permeable materials overlie less permeable materials. Should such a condition occur, recommendations for mitigation would be provided during future grading. LIQUEFACTION Seismically-induced liquefaction is a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquake-induced ground motion, create excess pore pressures in soils. The soils may thereby acquire a high degree of mobility, and lead to lateral movement, sliding, sand boils, consolidation and settlement of loose sediments, and other damaging deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table; but after liquefaction has developed, it can propagate upward into overlying, non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates. Typically, liquefaction has a relatively low potential at depths greater than 45 feet and is virtually unknown below a depth of 60 feet. Liquefaction susceptibility is related to numerous factors and the following conditions should be present for liquefaction to occur: 1) sediments must be relatively young in age and not have developed a large amount of cementation; 2) sediments generally consist of medium to fine grained relatively cohesionless sands; 3) the sediments must have low relative density; 4) free groundwater must be present in the sediment; and 5) the site must experience a seismic event of a sufficient duration and magnitude, to induce straining of soil particles. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page6 I I· I I. I I I I I· I I I I I 1. I I I I Inasmuch as three or four of these five conditions do not have the potential to affect the site and the entire site is underlain by dense bedrock materials and compacted fill materials, our evaluation indicates that the potential for liquefaction and associated adverse effects within the site is very low, even with a future rise in groundwater levels. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of representative site earth materials in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. Test procedures used and results obtained are presented below. Classification Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soils Classification System. The soil classifications are shown on the boring logs in Appendix B. Laboratory Standard The maximum density and optimum moisture content was determined for the major soil type encountered in the excavations. The laboratory standard used was ASTM D-1557. The moisture-density relationship obtained for this soil is shown below: B-1 @0-2' CLAYEY SILT, Olive Brown (Artificial Fill) Expansion Index Testing 117.0 14.5 Expansion index testing was performed on a representative soil sample, according to Standard No. 18-2 of the Uniform Building Code (1997). The test results are presented below as well as the expansion classification according to UBC (1997). 8-1 @0-2' CLAYEY SILT, Olive Brown (Artificial Fill) The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. 75 Medium W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page? I I I I I I I I I· I. I _, I I. I I· Shear Testing Shear tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM test method D-3080 in a Direct Shear Machine of the strain control type. The shear test results are presented below: I TP-1 @0-2' 355 20 Soluble Sulfates A typical sample of the site materials was analyzed for soluble sulfate content. The results indicate 270 ppm. Based upon the soluble sulfate test results (USC range for moderate is 150 to 1,500 ppm soluble [SO4] in water), the site soils have a moderate sulfate exposure for corrosion to concrete. The laboratory test results for corrosivity testing are presented in Appendix C. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS General Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analysis, it is our opinion that the subject site appears suitable for the proposed industrial development from a geotechnical engineering and geologic viewpoint, provided that the recommendations presented in the following sections are incorporated into the design and construction phases of site development. The primary geotechnical concerns with respect to the proposed development are: • Depth to competent bearing material, including cut/fill transitions. • Expansion potential of site soils. • Corrosion potential for exposed concrete. • Subsurface water and potential for perched water. • Regional seismic activity. The recommendations presented herein consider these as well as other aspects of the site. The engineering analyses performed, concerning site preparation and the recommendations presented herein, have been completed using the information provided and obtained during our field work, as well as information provided to this office with regard to grading (Appendix A). In the event that any significant changes are made to The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 8 I I I I I ,, I ,I I I I ~ I I I I proposed site development, the concluslons and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered_ valid unless the changes are reviewed and the recommendations of this report verified or modified in writing by this office. Foundation design parameters are considered preliminary until the foundation design, layout, and structural loads are provided to this office for review. Earth Materials/Depth to Competent Bearing Materials The existing non-uniform fill materials that exist within 1 to 2 feet of existing pad grade are generally loose/soft and/or do not meet the current industry minimum standard of 90 percent ( or greater) relative compaction. Recommendations for the treatment of existing fills are presented in the earthwork section of this report. If exposed during grading, additional evaluations may be performed as deemed appropriate. Formational materials will be encountered during site earthwork. These materials are considered competent to support settlement-sensitive structures in their existing state. Dependant upon actual building location and proposed pad grade, there is a potential to create a cut/fill transition on the site. Recommendations for overexcavation to mitigate cut/fill transitions are presented in the earthwork section of this report. Expansion Potential Our laboratory test results indicate that soils with a medium expansion potential underlie the site; however, our experience in the site area indicates soils with a high expansion potential also may exist onsite. This should be considered -during project design. Foundation design and construction recommendations are provided herein for both medium and high expansion potential classifications. These recommendations should be considered preliminary and used for general project planning. Corrosion Potential Our laboratory test results indicate that the site materials have a moderate sulfate exposure for corrosion to concrete. Recommendations for concrete are presented herein. Subsurface and Surface Water Subsurface and surface water, as discussed previously, are not anticipated to affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated into the construction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along fill/bedrock contacts and along zones of contrasting permeabilities should not be The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page9 I ,, I ' ,'~ . .;;~ I I I ~~-- 1 1- ,1 I I I I ,, ~· I I I I precluded from occurring in the future due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities. Should perched groundwater conditions develop, this office could assess the affected area(s) and provide the appropriate recommendations to mitigate the observed groundwater conditions. The groundwater conditions observed and opinions generated were those at the time of our investigation. Conditions may change with the introduction of irrigation, rainfall, or other factors that were not obvious at the time of our investigation. Regional Seismic Activity The seismicity acceleration values provided herein should be considered during the design of the proposed development. EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS General All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the Uniform Building Code (adopted and current edition), the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, and the Grading Guidelines presented in this report as Appendix D, except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading GSl's representative should be present at the preconstruction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if needed, and review the earthwork schedule. Earthwork beyond the limits of the surficial, remedial overexcavations or those indicated on the grading plan should be reviewed by the geologist and/or geotechnical consultant prior to and following these additional removals. During earthwork construction all site preparation and the general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill selectively tested by a representative(s) of GSI. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field or if modifications are proposed to the rough grade or precise grading plan, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. GSI does not consult in the area of safety engineering. Excavations into the granular material on this site may be unstable. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 10 1: I 'I I I I I ' I I I -'• ii I I I 1· --" I 1· I I Site Preparation Debris, vegetation, and other deleterious material should be removed from the improvement(s) area prior to the start of construction. Following removals, areas approved to receive additional fill should first be scarified in two perpendicular directions and moisture conditioned (at or above the soils optimum moisture content) to a depth of 12 inches and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Removals (Unsuitable Surficial Materials) Due to the desiccated and relatively soft/loose condition of near surface soils across the lot, removals should consist of fill soils within 1 to 2 feet of existing grades within the building footprint and parking/driveway areas. ·once these materials are removed, the bottom of the excavations should be observed and tested. At that time, the removed existing earth materials may be re-used as fill, provided the materials are moisture conditioned at or above the soils optimum moisture and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of this report. When removals are completed, the exposed surface should be scarified in two perpendicular directions (cross ripped), moisture conditioned and recompacted prior to fill placement. Overexcavation Formational materials occur near existing grade within the lot. Finish grading for the proposed development may create a cut/fill transition condition. If this condition occurs, a uniform structural support should be provided. Areas. underlain by formational materials within 5 feet of proposed grade, should be overexcavated to provide a minimum 5-foot layer of compacted fill and at least 5 feet outside the limits of the outer-most foundation elements. The limits of any bedrock overexcavation should be determined once a grading plan for the site is made available. This 5-foot overexcavation is considered a minimum and within the limits of the building assumes a 2-foot footing embedment (from lowest adjacent soil grade). If embedments are greater than 2 feet, the overexcavation should be increased to a minimum of 3 feet beyond the bottom of the footing and the lateral extent should be increased the same amount beyond the width of the footing. Cut areas greater than 2 feet below existing grade should be well scarified (cross-ripped), moisture conditioned as necessary, and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM test method 0-1557). Fill Placement Subsequent to ground preparation, onsite soils may be placed in thin (±6 inch) lifts, cleaned of vegetation and debris, brought to a least optimum moisture content, and compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. Oversized cobbles The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 11 I I I I ~r{J I I I I ·1, 1· I· I I 1- ·1·; ~ I ·1 I 1- and boulders (8 to 24 inches), generated as the result of the earthwork should be placed outside of the limits of the building in lands_cape areas or a pre-designated disposal area. If fill materials are imported to the site, the proposed import fill should be submitted to GSI, so laboratory testing can be performed to verify that the intended import material is compatible with onsite material. At least three business days of lead time should be allowed by builders or contractors for proposed import submittals. This lead time will allow for particle size analysis, specific gravity, relative compaction, expansion testing, and blended import/native characteristics as deemed necessary. Erosion Control Onsite soils materials have a moderate erosion potential. Use of hay bales, silt fences, and/or sandbags should be considered, as appropriate during construction. Temporary grades should be constructed to drain at a minimum of 1 to 2 percent to a suitable temporary or permanent outlet. Precise grades should be evaluated by the design civil engineer to reduce concentrated flows to less than 6 feet per second (Amimoto, 1981) and into lined or landscaped swales. Evaluation 0f cuts during grading will be necessary in order to identify any areas of loose or non-cohesive materials. Should any significant zones be encountered during earthwork construction, additional remedial grading may be recommended; however, only the remedial measures discussed herein are anticipated at this time. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS In the event that the information concerning the proposed development plan is not correct or any changes in the design, location, or loading conditions of the proposed structure are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are for Lot 98 only and shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by this office. The information and recommendations presented in this section are considered minimums and are not meant to supersede design(s) by the project structural engineer or civil engineer specializing in structural design. Upon request, GSI could provide additional consultation regarding soil parameters, as related to foundation design. They are considered preliminary recommendations for proposed construction, in consideration of our field investigation, laboratory testing, and engineering analysis. Recommendations for Concrete 11Tilt-up11 Structures For preliminary planning purposes, the following is presented. It is our understanding that the structure will be erected utilizing a tilt-up type of construction. We assume that column loads are not anticipated to exceed 100 kips for dead plus live loading conditions while The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 12 I ·1 I I' ·1- .,. I ·I . ·, I I I I --- 1 I wall loads are not expected to exceed 3 to 5 kips per lineal foot. The engineering analysis performed, concerning the foundation system and the recommendations offered below, have been prepared using these anticipated loads and assuming the recommended earthwork is performed. In the event that the information concerning the proposed development is not correct, or any changes in the design, location, or loading conditions of the proposed structure are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by this office. Design Our review, field work, and laboratory testing indicates that onsite soils have a moderate expansion potential. Preliminary recommendations for foundation design and construction are presented below. Final foundation recommendations should be provided at the conclusion of grading based on laboratory testing of fill materials exposed at finish grade. Bearing Value An allowable vertical bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) should be used for design of continuous footings a minimum 15 inches wide and 18 inches deep (below lowest adjacent exterior grade) and for design of square footings 24 inches wide and 24 inches deep (below lowest adjacent grade, not including sand layer), bearing in properly compacted fill material. Per UBC code, this value may be increased by 20 percent for each- additional 12 inches in depth of embedment or width, to a maximum value of 2500 pounds per square foot. The above values may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Exterior square footings should be tied back to the main foundation with a grade beam or tie beam as described in the "construction" section of this report. In addition, foundation depths and widths should be constructed per the UBC guidelines . Lateral Pressure Passive earth pressure of compacted fill may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 225 pounds per cubic foot per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot. An allowable coefficient of friction between compacted fill soil and concrete of 0.35 may be used with the dead load forces. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. All footings should maintain a minimum 7-foot horizontal setback from the base of the footing to any descending slope. This distance is measured from the footing face at the bearing elevation. Footings should maintain a minimum horizontal setback of H/3 (H = slope height} from the base of the footing to the descending slope face and no less than The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, "1998 Page "13 I I: ~--· I:' II: k:,:.,:; I ·1: ' 1· ·- 1~ ,I -- 1- 1· - . ,- l,I 1· '';_,; 1- ·1· I I: 7 feet nor need be greater than 40 feet. Footings adjacent to unlined drainage swales should be deepened to a minimum of 6 inches below the invert of the adjacent unlined swale. Footings for structures adjacent to retaining walls should be deepened so as to extend below a 1 :1 projection from the heel of the wall. Alternatively, walls may be designed to accommodate structural loads from buildings or appurtenances as described in the retaining wall section of this report. Due to anticipated disturbances in areas adjacent to landscaping, the upper 6 inches of passive pressure should be neglected if not confined by slabs or pavement. Construction All footings should be embedded a minimum 18 inches into properly compacted fill or bedrock. Foundation footings should be minimally reinforced with four No. 5 bars, two top and two bottom {in the cross-sections). Footings should be: a) tied with a grade beam or tie beams, or b) have continuous footings across large openings, (i.e., garages or entrances). All exterior isolated footings should be tied in at least two perpendicular directions by grade beams or tie beams to reduce the potential for lateral drift or differential distortion. The base of the grade beams should enter the adjoining footings at the same depth as the footings {i.e., in profile view). The grade beam steel should be continuous at the footing connection. Grade beams and footings should be minimally reinforced and sized per the structural engineers recommendations. Foundation Settlement -Structural Loads Provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction phase of development, a majority {50 percent or more) of the anticipated foundation settlement is expected to occur during construction. Maximum settlement is not expected to exceed approximately¾ to 1 inch and should occur below the heaviest loaded columns. Differential settlement is not expected to exceed approximately¼ to ½ inch between similar elements, in a 20-foot span . FLOOR SLAB DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Concrete slab-on-grade floor construction is anticipated. The following are presented as minimum design parameters for the slab, but they are in no way intended to supersede design by the structural engineer. Design parameters do not account for concentrated loads (e.g., fork lifts, other machinery, etc.) and/or the use of freezers or heating boxes. Light Load Floor Slabs The slabs in areas that will receive relatively light live loads (i.e., less than 50 psf) should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bar on 18 inches The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 14 1. 1: ,, I. •-"'> I ,, I I 'I II - 1· I ,, I 1-:;,.;; 1· . , I I: centers in two horizontally perpendicular directions. Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. 11Hooking11 of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The recommended minimum compressive strength of concrete is 2,500 pounds per square inch (ASTM 520-C-2500). A minimum 4 inch layer of clean select sand should be provided beneath the concrete slab. The project structural engineer should consider the use of transverse and longitudinal control joints to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement are: 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel to increase the tensile strength of the slab; and 2) provide an adequate amount of control and/or expansion joints to accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. Transverse and longitudinal crack control joints should be spaced no more than 12 feet on center and constructed to a minimum depth of T/4, where 11T11 equals the slab thickness in inches. · Heavy Load Floor Slabs The project structural engineer should design the slabs in areas subject to high loads (machinery, forklifts, storage racks, etc. or above standard office loading). The Modulus of subgrade reaction (k-value) may be used in the design of the floor slab supporting heavy truck traffic, fork lifts, machine foundations and heavy storage areas. A k-value (modulus of subgrade reaction) of 75 pounds per square inch per inch (pci) would be prudent to utilize for preliminary slab design. An R-value test and/or plate load test may be used to verify the k-value on near surface fill soils. Concrete slabs should be at least 5½ inches thick and reinforced with at least No. 3 reinforcing bars placed 18 inches on center in two directions. Selection of slab thickness compatibility with anticipated loads should be provided by the structural engineer. Heavily loaded concrete slabs should be underlain with a minimum of 4 inches of ¾-inch crushed rock (vibrated into place), or 4 inches of aggregate base materials (Class 2 aggregate base or equivalent) compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Transverse and longitudinal crack control joints should be spaced no more than 14 feet on center and constructed to a minimum depth of T/4, where 11T11 equals the slab thickness in inches. The use of expansion joints in the slab should be considered. Concrete used in slab construction should be of minimum compressive strength 3250 pounds per square inch (ASTM 560-C-3250). Spacing of expansion or crack control joints should be modified based on the footprint of the area to be heavily loaded. These recommendations are meant as minimums. The project architect and/or structural engineer should review and verify that the minimum recommendations presented herein are considered adequate with respect to anticipated uses . The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 15 I I :::::.~ 1· I I 1- li __ , 1- l 1- ,I I I I I I I, I I Subgrade Preparation The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimum 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density. Prior to placement of concrete, the medium expansive subgrade soils should be presaturated to 18 inches below grade to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative prior to visqueen placement and prior to and within 72 hours of the concrete pour. Moisture Protection In areas where moisture condensation is undesirable (e.g., areas to have moisture- sensitive floor coverings), a minimum 6 mil plastic membrane should be placed with all laps/openings sealed. The membrane should be sandwiched between two 2-inch (minimum) sand layers for a total of 4 inches of sand. These areas should be separate from areas not similarly protected. This separation could be provided with a concrete cut- off wall (minimum 6 inches thick) extending at least 18 inches into the subgrade soil, below the sand layer. CORROSION AND CONCRETE MIX GSI conducted preliminary sampling of near-surface materials for soluble sulfates·on the subject site. Laboratory test results indicate that the site materials have a moderate potential for corrosion to concrete. The design criteria presented in Table· 19-A-2 and 19-A- 3 of the UBC (1997 edition) should be followed. Based on the corrosion potential for exposed concrete, foundations should be constructed using Type 11, IP (MS}, or IS (MS) concrete. Upon completion of grading, additional testing of soils (including import materials) should be considered prior to the construction of utilities and foundations. Alternative methods and additional comments may be obtained from a qualified corrosion engineer. RETAINING WALL RECOMMENDATIONS General The equivalent fluid pressure parameters provide for either the use of native or low expansive select granular backfill to be utilized behind the proposed walls. The low expansive granular backfill should be provided behind the wall at a 1: 1 (h:v) projection from the heel of the foundation system. Low expansive fill is Class 3 aggregate baserock or Class 2 permeable rock. Wall backfilling should be performed with relatively light equipment within the same 1 :1 projection (i.e., hand tampers, walk behind compactors). Highly expansive soils should not be used to backfill any proposed walls. During construction, materials should not be stockpiled behind nor in front of walls for a distance of 2H where H is the height of the wall. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 16 1· ·-··-J l -I I 1- 1 1·: I 1- 1 1- 1- 1- 1 I _ _, I I I I Foundation systems for any proposed retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the Foundation Design section of this report. Building walls, below grade, should.be water-proofed or damp-proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. All walls should be properly designed in accordance with the recommend~tions presented below. Some movement of the walls constructed should be anticipated as soil strength parameters are mobilized. This movement could cause some cracking depending upon the materials used to construct the wall. To reduce the potential for wall cracking, walls should be internally grouted and reinforced with steel. To mitigate this effect, the use of vertical crack control joints and expansion joints, spaced at 20 feet or less along the walls should be employed. Vertical expansion control joints should be infilled with a flexible grout. Wall footings should be keyed or doweled across vertical expansion joints. Restrained Walls Loading Dock Wall It is recommended that loading dock walls be designed for restrained conditions (indicated below), where adjacent to the proposed site building. Loading dock walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressure and any additional lateral pressures caused by surcharge loads on the anticipated adjoining slab surface. Approximately up to ½ of surcharge loads on the truck loading dock slab may be added as a uniform load in the back of the loading dock wall. However, the structural engineer or civil engineering specializing in structural design should review and evaluate the type of wall connection(s) and the condition of the wall (restrained or cantilever). Other Walls Any retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing and compacting backfill material or that have re-entrant or male corners, shoufd be designed for an at-rest equivalent fluid pressures (EFP) of 65 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. This restrained-wall, earth pressure value is. for select backfill material only. For areas of male or re-entrant corners, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner. Building walls below grade or greater than 2 feet in height should be water-proofed or damp-proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. The wall should be drained as indicated in the following section. A seismic increment of 1 OH (uniform pressure) should be considered on walls for level backfill, and 20H for sloping backfill of 2:1, where His defined as the height of retained material behind the wall. For structural footing loads within the 1 :1 zone of influence behind wall backfill, refer to the following section. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 17 1- 1 I I: ~SJ I t 1- f 1- t t 1·~ 1-, I I -~ I I I I Cantilevered Walls These recommendations are for cantilevered retaining walls up to 1 0 feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events, expansive soils, or adverse geologic conditions. ;,}:'~,:;::_:~::ri::ir:1::i=:~!!~~::~~~~!i~i~r::~::;l:1::~111r'.J111::11111 ;:~;:i;:~:::~~Ij~~~,~~~~:~~~~~:~~1;:~~~:,i:;::l::11 I ~~I~ I ~ I *To be increased by traffic, structural surcharge and seismic loading as needed. **Level walls are those where grades behind the wall are level for a distance of 2H. Wall Backfill and Drainage All retaining walls should be proviged with an adequate backdrain and outlet system (a minimum two outlets per wall and no greater than 100 feet apart), to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures and be designed in accordance with minimum standards presented herein. See site wall drain options (Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5). Drain pipe should consist of 4-inch diameter perforated schedule 40 PVC pipe embedded in gravel. Gravel used in the backdrain systems should be a minimum of 3 cubic feet per lineal foot of %- to 1-inch clean crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent) and 12 inches thick behind the wall. Where the void to be fitted is constrained by lot lines or property boundaries, the use of panel drains (Mirafi 5000 or equivalent) may be considered with the approval of the project geotechnical engineer. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted to 90 percent relative compaction with native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. Weeping of the walls in lieu of a backdrain is not recommended for walls greater than 2 feet in height. For walls 2 feet or less in height, weepholes should be no greater than 6 feet on center in the bottom coarse of block and above the landscape zone. A paved drainage channel (v-ditch or substitute), either concrete or asphaltic concrete, behind the top of the walls with sloping backfill should be considered to reduce the potential for surface water penetration. For level backfill, the grade should be sloped such that drainage is toward a suitable outlet at 1 to 2 percent. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 18 I I I -)~ 1· _, I 1. I 1- -· I I: I I I I ...... ,~· I I I I Manufactured drainage Geocomposite drain ( Mira drain 5000 or equivalent ) Note: Filter fabric wraps completely ar-ound perforated pipe and behind core materiel, core material wraos benecth bottom of p:pe. 4" die. min. perforated --- pipe pieced with holes '----,-:-,, down and sloped at 1 -2% to suitable outlet l 4" m;n, granular mate6cl J (class 2 permeable or 3/8-1" clean crushed rock wrapped in a .. filter fabric) 0 ., 0 / / (J ~ ' ' i I Ceo drain (cut off) 18;, below soil line ,-1---Site retaining wail (structure! design by others) Pavement section per -. GSI reccmmencaticns j I Finishe~ lot sur.face - i L Woll footing (designed by others) I I I I I I I I SCHEMATIC OF SITE WALL DRAIN OPTION .A Figure 3 DATE 8/98 W.O. NO 2474-A-SC Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental FORM 89/22 I I I I ·.,d I 1- 1 I 1- I 1- I; ,...:, I I 1- I 1 Cap drain (cut off) f 18" below soil line Waterproofing ...... ~··' ~ ...... ·: 12" thick (min.) drain rock ----...J .:. :. ':\· i'~·= (class 2 permeable) or ·• ... · ~; .... .,;~ other acceptable granular • , • n· 1'.·"": I " : 1 ,,· ·.,. •• , , • : • · material, 1 8-1 clean ,·.· :··! •. :,:. .. crushed rock wrapped in • •• • ·:· '.'f .. 1,. ( f' 140 '•'.' ··7•'• .,,. a filter fabric Mira 1 ·~:,: :~ ·: ••• "':: or equivalent) : •.. ·.,.-•• , .. 4" die. min. perforated pipe placed with holes down and slooed at 1-2% to a suitable 'outlet ,·. ·.• :,:,,•!• l :• ·~.:-·: ............ . I 1 1 ..._ 1~ t t' I e t I I • • t ~ t .. ;, I•.::..,. •, I I ..., e I I • '• I '.• / 1, tt • f . , ., . •.; ·· .. -..... · ';• '• ..... , • t • ', .. ·. . I I .---Site recc,n1ng well (structural design by others) Pavement section per GS! recomendations Finished lot surface - I 4" Min. J 4 '.' M' ~ ~ ~ I ·1 ~;_,' ', . ~' . ·' .': -~ in· I 1 1 o b. 1 o • 1 o • p • 1, to, 1,.1 ,. ,.to o,,. , -• I • • 1 • , 4" M' • . 0 • " I . 0 t o • , • _..., tn. , 0 I,_ lo o• I~•••""'• •(l• • •• ' "• I " I ' o' • o • ~ I • • I o0 P " • I • ~o , r • • .. • o" • b.,o' 0 .. ~ t • '1:.,~ 4 • b,o b,o .., • , • • • \Ja.ll Footing (designed by others) -' T I SCHEMATIC OF SITE WALL DRAIN OPTION B Figure 4 DATE __;:8::;.:.l..;::;9 __ 8 __ W. 0. N0 .. __ ..,.2.;;a;,47.._4_-_Aa,;.;.-.-.$.zC __ _ Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental FORM 89/22 1- 1· 1- 1· 1- 1 I I ,__ I I I I If finished surface is within 8" of top of footing wall drains shell be at 6' intervals along the length of the wall and located at the level of the bottom course of block. The drcins shall be 4" in diameter. 24." thick (min.) drain rock -----... (class 2 permeable) or other occeotoble cranulcr materiel, 1/8-i" clecn crushed rock wrcooed in C filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent) . . 2 • • • • ,• I '• ,' • • •. : . · .. '·. :: : . ·• 1,, I ~ .. . .. . . . ' . . , . . ,--Cao drain' (c~t off) I 18" below soil line y Pcvemenc section per ---, l"'C:' . t· I v-i recomencc ions 1 i i I i J_ I , , I I 8-I 1, ~ 1 ~ t -o ·: .• ~ b. •', 0 t 1 1 6 ~ I 6 • • / / ! --~ , •• ,. t ,r•o, lo' to • FORM 89/22 I , . I I o I , , , • , , .~ o I I , o t o • • ~ , j o • , • , • • I I ob. :, , I I , • o ,•o .v I o I r, i, f S O o • ( r..,l 4 (• • •• • • , 4, • ., , • ' -~ o I , ' 0 • o ' O' •1 , : .. •• I o ~ • ;, ' , 0 / o ~ t • , ~: 6. • b. Q ~ 0 , .. 0 , .o .. b. 0 • • w'o.ll Feating Cde~gned by others) SCHEMATIC OF SITE. WALL DRAIN OPTION C Figure 5 DATE __,8....,/_.9 __ 8 __ w. 0. N0.,_.......,::2::,;;:4:;.1,,74.-.,1;A~-Jllis.Mc~-- Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental I I I I '-=~;; 1· I I 1· I I 1· 1· 1· I I I I I I Retaining Wall Footing Transitions Site walls are anticipated to be founded on footings designed in accordance with the recommendations in this report. Wall footings may transition from formational bedrock to gravelly fill to select fill. If this condition is present th_e civil designer may specify either: a) If transitions from rock fill to select fill transect the wall footing alignment at an angle of less than 45 degrees (plan view), then the designer should perform a minimum 2-foot overexcavation for a distance of two times the height of the wall and increase overexcavation until such transition is between 45 and 90 degrees to the wall alignment. b) Increase of the amount of reinforcing steel and wall detailing (i.e., expansion joints or crack control joints) such that an angular distortion of 1 /360 for a distance of 2H (where H=wall height iri feet) on either side of the transition may be accommodated. Expansion joints should be sealed with a flexible, non-shrink grout. c) Embed the footings entirely into a homogeneous fill. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN Pavement sections presented are based on the A-value data (to be verified by specific A- value testing at completion of grading) obtained throughout the project area, the anticipated design classification, information provided by the client, and the minimum requirements of the City of Carlsbad. For planning purposes, pavement sections consisting of asphaltic concrete over base and full depth Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) are provided. Anticipated asphaltic concrete (AC) pavement sections are presented in the following: Parking Stalls 4.5 16 4.0 Traffic Areas 5.0 16 4.0 <1lDenotes standard Caltrans Class 2 aggregate base® ~78, SE ~22). <2lCity of Carlsbad minimum AC thickness is 4 inches. 4.0 6.0 <3lTI values have been assumed for planning purposes herein and should be confirmed by the design team durinq future plan development. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp?\2400\247 4a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 22 I: I 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- I I I I I Portland cement concrete pavement sections are presented below. :·-·-· ,--· .. _.,., : .. · _:· '' . : i.;~~,~~r ·:. ·:·· : :· .·.:· .. ·····.=. Parking Stalls 10 16 light 5.5 Parking Stalls 25 16 light 6.0 Parking Stalls 100 16 light 6.0 Traffic Lane 10 16 medium 6.5 Traffic Lane 25 16 medium 7.0 Traffic Lane 100 16 medium 7.0 Traffic Lane 300 16 medium 7.5 Traffic Lane 500 16 medium 7.5 Loading Dock 10 16 heavy 7.5 Loading Dock 25 16 heavy 8.0 Loading Dock 100 16 heavy 8.0 Loading Dock 300 16 heavy 8.5 Loading Dock 500 16 heavy 8.5 <1>concrete shall be 560-C-3250 minimum. Assumes the construction of concrete shoulders. <2> ADTT values have been assumed for planning purposes herein and should be confirmed by the design team during future plan develooment. The pavement sections presented above have been calculated based on a subgrade R-value of 16, modulus of rupture (MR) of 560 psi and the use of concrete shoulders (curb and gutter) at the edge of pavement. A load safety factor of 1.0 and 1.1 were applied to parking and traffic/loading areas, respectively. GSI does not recommend the use of an ADTT value of less than 25 for any pavement section, unless the ADTT significantly less than 25 is certified by a civil engineer specializing in traffic engineering. Design of truck loading docks should utilize guidelines provided for traffic lanes. The transition of the pavement from parking to traffic lanes should be made over a distance of 18 inches with crack control joints (weaken plane) or contact joints at the end of the The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 23 I ,. 1: I :;:J I 1· I I' 1· 1· I 1· 1- 1 I I I I I transition. A minimum 4-inch layer of base rock in traffic and loading dock area should be considered to improve traffic lane performance. Base rock may consist of either ¾-inch crushed rock or Caltrans Class 2 aggregate base. Crushed rock may be compacted by vibratory methods. Aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. PCC Pavement Joints Weakened Plane Joints Transverse and longitudinal weakened plane joints may be constructed per Caltrans Standard specifications, Section 40-1.088 and 40-1.088(1). Transverse weakened plane joints should be spaced no farther than 15 feet apart and no closer than 5 feet. Longitudinal weakened plane joints should be spaced no farther than 20 feet apart, but not less than 5 feet. Joint layout may be determined per the applicable San Diego Regional Standard Drawings G-18 through G-21 (inclusive). Expansion Joints Transverse expansion joints should be constructed at 120 foot spacings in accordance with San Diego Regional Standard Drawing G-1 o. Contact Joints Transverse and longitudinal contact joints should be constructed in accordance with the contact joint detail shown on the San Diego Regional Standard Drawing G-1 o. Joint layout may be determined per the applicable San Diego Regional Standard Drawings G-18 through G-21 (inclusive). Within large parking areas, joint spacings should be no greater than 20 feet. Slab Reinforcement PCC Pavements for this project are designed as unreinforced and should perform adequately, assuming proper construction. If additional control of internal slab stresses (i.e., curing shrinkage, thermal expansion and contraction) is desired, then the use of 6- inch by 6-inch (6x6 -W1 .4 x W1 .4), welded-wire mesh (or equivalent) may be considered. Pavement grading recommendations are presented in Appendix E. Subgrade preparation and aggregate base preparation should be performed in accordance with those recommendations, and the minimum subgrade (upper 12 inches) and Class 2 aggregate base compaction should be 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). If adverse conditions (i.e., saturated ground, etc.) are encountered during preparation of subgrade, special construction methods may need to be employed. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 24 I: 1·. I l '!:,.~ I 1- I I 1- 1- 1- I 1· I I I I I I· These recommendations should be considered preliminary. Further R-value testing and pavement design analysis should be performe9 upon completion of grading for the lot. FLATWORK AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS 1. Planters and walls should not be tied to building(s). 2. Driveways, sidewalks, and patios adjacent to the building(s) should be separated from the building(s) with thick expansion joint filler material. In addition, all sidewalks and driveways should be quartered and poured with expansion joints no farther apart than 8 feet for 4-inch slabs or 11 feet for 5½-inch slabs, respectively. To improve the performance of the driveway and/or sidewalks constructed on the expansive soils, consideration should be given to pre-saturation of the soils prior to placement of driveways and sidewalks to 120 percent of optimum moisture, for medium expansive soils. Consideration should additionally be given for the areas of the driveways and sidewalks adjacent to planters, lawns, and other landscape areas to have thickened edges, such that the edge is 4 to 6 inches thick and at least 6 inches below the adjacent landscaping zone (section). 3. Overhang structures should be structurally designed with continuous footings or grade beams tied in at least two directions. Footings that support overhang structures should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches from the lowest adjacent finished subgrade. 4. Any masonry landscape walls that are to be constructed throughout the property should be fully grouted and articulated in segments no more than 20 feet long. 5. Utilities should be enclosed within a closed vault or designed with flexible connections to accommodate differential settlement and expansive soil conditions. 6. Finish grade (Precise Grade Plan) on the lot should provide a minimum of 1 to 2 percent fall to the street. It should be kept in mind that drainage reversals could occur if relatively flat yard drainage gradients are not maintained due to landscaping work, modifications to flatwork, or post-sale homeowner modifications. Tile Flooring Tile flooring can crack, reflecting cracks in the concrete slab below the tile. Therefore, the designer should consider additional steel reinforcement of concrete slabs on-grade where tile will be placed. The tile installer should consider installation methods that reduce possible cracking of the tile such as slipsheets. Slipsheets or a vinyl crack isolation membrane (approved by the Tile Council of America/Ceramic Tile Institute) is recommended between tile and concrete slabs on grade. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 25 I --· I 1- 1 ~t.J 1- I 1· 1- 1 1- 1-,. 1- 1· I I I I I Gutters and Downspouts Consideration should be given to the installation of gutters and downspouts to collect roof water that may otherwise infiltrate the soils adjacent to the structures. The downspouts should be drained away from the foundation and collected in drainage swales or other approved non-erosive drainage systems designed by a registered civil engineer (specializing in drainage) to convey water away from the foundation. Gutters and downspouts are not a geotechnical requirement, however, provided positive drainage is maintained in accordance with the recommendations of the design civil engineer. Exterior Slabs and Walkways Exterior concrete slabs-on-grade (walkways, patios, etc.) should be constructed with a minimum 4-inch thick slab, and reinforced with steel rebar or welded mesh. The reinforcement should consist of No. 3 rebar placed at 18 inches on center in two horizontally perpendicular directions (long axis and short axis), or 6x6-W2.9xW2.9 welded wire mesh. It is important for the performance of the slab that the reinforcing be located near mid-slab thickness using chairs, supports, etc. Hooking is not an acceptable method of reinforcement placement, and is not recommended. Distortions on the exterior slab-on-grade due to expansive soils and proximity to slopes may warrant additional mitigation. This may include crack control joints (4 to 6 feet spacing in horizontally perpendicular directions [long axis and short axis]), and expansion · control joints at intervals 1 O feet or less. Other considerations for mitigation may include the use of thickened edges (see above) for slabs at the top of slopes, fiber mesh mixed into the concrete, or pre-saturation of subgrade soils to 120 percent of optimum moisture content, to a depth of 18 inches. Due to expansive soils, air conditioning (NC) units should be supported by slabs that are incorporated into the building foundation (PT slab) or constructed on a rigid slab with flexible couplings for plumbing and electrical lines. NC waste water lines should be drained to a suitable outlet (see previous section). Shrinkage cracks in concrete could become excessive if proper finishing and curing practices are not followed. Finishing and curing practices should be performed per the Portland Cement Association Guidelines. Mix design should incorporate rate of curing for climate and time of year, sulfate content of soils, corrosion potential of soils, and fertilizers used on site. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 26 I I· I I: ... _ --~ I 1- 1- I 1- 1- 1- 1- ··- 1- 1· I· __ .. I I I I ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS/DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Additional Site Improvements If in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request this includes but not limited to appurtenant structures. This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench, and retaining wall backfills. Erosion and Sedimentation Control The objective of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements are to reduce (or eliminate) discharge of non-stormwater runoff from construction sites. One of the best management practices (BM P's) to mitigate significant erosion from sites in the grading phase of construction is implementation of structural containment devices, including but not limited to sandbags, retention basins, hay bales, etc. BMP's should be developed prior to the start of mass grading. As described in the General Permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specific to the subject development is required, and should include an erosion control plan presenting best management practices (BMP's) for runoff control. The erosion control plan should be exhibited on the grading plans. The SWPPP should be maintained until a post- construction management plan is in effect. These services would be provided by GSI upon request. Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of soil, and slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for planted slopes. Over-watering should be avoided. Onsite soil materials should be maintained in a solid to semisolid state. Brushed native and graded slopes (constructed within and utilizing onsite materials) would be potentially erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover soon after construction. Plants selected for landscaping should be light weight, deep rooted types that require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Planting of large trees with potential for extensive root development should not be placed closer than 1 o feet from the perimeter of the foundation or the anticipated height of the mature tree, The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 27 1: Ii I I: d I' I 1- 1 1--~ I 1· ..... 1- 1- 1- 1. _;.;:; 1-- 1- 1- 1 whichever is greater. It order to minimize erosion on the slope face, an erosion control fabric (i.e. jute matting) should be considered. From a geotechnical standpoint, leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils area processed for the purpose of adding amendments they should be recompacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. Moisture sensors, embedded into fill slopes, should be considered to reduce the potential of overwatering from automatic landscape watering systems. The use of certain fertilizers may affect the corrosion characteristics of soil. Review of the type and amount (pounds per acre) of the fertilizers by a corrosion specialist should be considered. Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. If in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request. This office should be notified in advance of any additional fill placement, regrading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench, and retaining wall backfills. Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations arid not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. Landscaping should be graded to drain into the street, or other approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage." Roof gutters and down spouts are recommended to control roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet a minimum of 5 feet from proposed structures or tightlined into a subsurface drainage system. We recommend that any proposed open bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 1 o feet. As an alternative, closed bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. Drainage behind top of walls should be accomplished along the length of the wall with a paved channel drainage v-ditch or substitute. Footing Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations should be observed and approved by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, if not removed from the site. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 28 I: I .-• I I ~,;.;_:J I -... ,,. 1· ,. 1- 1- ...., 1~ 1- 1 1· 1· ......; I· 1- 1- I I Trench Backfill All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to OSHA and local safety codes. Exterior trenches should not be excavated below a 1 :1 projection from the bottom of any adjacent foundation system. If excavated, these trenches may undermine support for the foundation system potentially creating adverse conditions. l 1. All utility trench backfill in slopes, structural areas and beneath hardscape features should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Observations, probing and, if deemed necessary, testing should be performed by a representative of this office to verify compactive efforts of the contractor. 2. Soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent {ASTM D-1557) if not removed from the site. 3. Jetting of backfill is not recommended. 4. Bottoms of utility trenches should be sloped away from structures. PLAN REVIEW Final site development and foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment, as the plans become available, for the purpose of minimizing any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition, foundation excavations and any additional earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested by this office. If conditions are found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at that time. LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed representative of the area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed during site grading, construction, and our post-grading study. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing, or . recommendations performed or provided by others. Inasmuch as our study is based upon the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusion and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 29 I: I· ,~ I: ;! .. ~ 1- , ... I 1- 1- _, 1- 1 -~ :1-,...., , .. _,,., I I I practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI performed this study within the constraints of a budget. During the field exploration phase of our study, odors or stained or discolored soils were not observed onsite or in our borings or boring spoils. However, these observations were made during our preliminary geotechnical study and should in no way be used in lieu of an environmental assessment. If requested, a proposal for a phase I preliminary environmental assessment could be provided. The Blackmore Company Lot 98 of Carlsbad Research Center File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. W.O 2474-A-SC August 3, 1998 Page 30 . , · ..... _. I· . .__;, .. ' I· I. 1· I . ~ .. ..t-.-.1 .•,::_ . _ ... ., . . : . . ~ .. ~ -"'· .. : ~. ;, ,:·.. . ~·,., -· .. _., .•' -' .. '-: . _,.' :;:_: •••• 1 ,.. L . '. " . . ,. ·, ., .... .. ....... ... .,/: :..-:-· • ,i ···:.·,:- ,, .. · . ~ -~ \..., -:· .. _ :: ~ ' . > -.·.·:.·-· -~ .. · .. ·· . -. -~ : .. "; ~-~ · . . .. ... : ·: ~ ... -·. ... ~ 1 • '. ""' •• : - .APPENDIX .A " .. "•.· -... u ... ~-..... ~ } • .! • · . .: : . .. ',·', .. ~ ... ' -. • !I: • l . ,( .. :--• ... ....... ,? . ·.:"' .. -:-.. : . ... ,• ... ~ ... . ,: -: ! •.• ,• _.. -', ......... ··-· .. ·.--.. '. , •• _"'£:. _,_ .... _. '· ··REFE_RENCEs·· - : ·' .... .. · -.. ·· ., - ,,_ ··.',!: -··., .• >•. ,., ,. .. :;,_ .~' . :• . \ :"": . ..,.. .. . ·;···, . .., . ~ •. .. , ..... ' ··' . ~---. . . :--~ . \'·- .: ~ .'~ .:,.'::• _,._ .... : ..... " .· ·. .•: ,.·. ..... , •. ' ;_- 1:. I: I -1 ~ I I I 1· I' I -~ I I I I -~ I I 1· I I Appendix A REFERENCES Amimoto, Perry Y., 1981, Erosion and sediment control handbook: Division of Mines and Geology, Department of Conservation, May. Blake, Thomas F., 1997, EQFAULT computer program and users manual for the deterministic prediction of horizontal accelerations from digitized California faults. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y., 1994, Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration from worldwide accelrograms recorded from 1957 to 1993; Proceedings, Fifth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, volume 111, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, pp 292-293. GeoSoils, Inc., undated, In-house, unpublished data. Geotechnics Incorporated, 1994, As-graded geotechnical report, Carlsbad Research Center, Unit 5, Carlsbad, California, Project No. 0017-001-01, April 29. Greensfelder, R. W., 1974, Maximum credible rock acceleration from earthquakes in California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23. Hart, E.W., 1997, Fault-rupture hazard zones in California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. Housner, G. W., 1970, Strong ground motion in Earthquake Engineering, Robert Wiegel, ed., Prentice-Hall. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform building code: Whittier, California, vol. 1, 2, and 3. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1 :750,000. Joyner, W. B., and Boore, D. M., 1988, Measurement characterization and prediction of strong ground motion, in Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II --recent advances in ground motion evaluation: American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publication no. 20, p. 43 to 102. __ , 1982, Prediction of earthquake response spectra, U. S. Geological Survey Open- File Report 82-977, 16 p. --, 1981 , Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 71, no. 6, p. 2011-2038. GeoSoils, Ine. I; . J I I I: -2.ii I 1· 1, ,-. ,- -~ .I 1· .I I I I .N I I I I Sadigh, K., Egan, J., and Youngs, R., 1987, Predictive ground motion equations reported in Joyner, W.B., and Boore, D.M., 1988, "Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground.motion11, in Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, Von Thun, J.L., ed.: American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Special Publication No. 20, pp. 43-102. Sowers and Sowers, 1970, Unified soil classification system {After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487-667) in Introductory Soil Mechanics, New York. Weber, Harold F., 1982, Geologic map of the central-north coastal area of San Diego County, California, showing recent slope failures and pre-development landslides: United States Geologic Survey, Open-File Report 82-12. The Blackmore Company File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. Appendix A Page2 :-,. . . ~: ."' ... -· .. ;-. ., '· ,· . . , ·1 1·.-: I .. ; . . -.. ' ••• •• ~ • •• '• 'I,, • : -: . -. . ~~-,,' '\. "· ' . ·'.... ' ' _ .. ·~ .. _; . '' :,,. ' .. ~ ... .... ;;,. ~ :.:-. _-:-. ·: . .. ·--~··.,., :: . . -~· ,.; . ,,.·,.<:.:: -.. '. . -, .. ~: •.· '• .. :--::'. -: .. ~· .. .···· ,' ,· 1 .,·., .·-·· .,.;_ ,· . •;_ .. -· ', . ' • • ,I .. ~- -~ .· :. :./1.: . ~ ' ;-: . ··,;· :: .,.• - '. ' . -·- ,;_, . . . ~--. .· ..... ,• _ .. _. .. _ ...... :·.1 • .. .... ... . _ :<·,."-, •••· .,. .-•: .f-, -.. · . .. ;• . ! .-... -~ ':· .... , .-.. '• ~, '~ .. - ,•, . ..... .. . • .J ... • ,,, _,. .. .. ' .: • ., ••• ~~: .. ,\ ·::\:·; • J, ,·! .<:.:-. ' j • ,· . -.(,: •· '·. ':·. -·_.':_ ~,. ; ' -.. , : ~--<-:::·,,: ; ~)-··./·;:. ·' .. ·'• ... ,, . ::· .. ' ...... . ·,,.· • • ! -~ ;; ~-·!.' , . i .. ·. _ .. . . ~ . ' -' _;_· .... - . • ..,•, -r -.. ,-.. -~ ' :. . ...... .• .,· .. .A .•. • ·" .' ~· ..... , 1-,, GeoSoils, Inc. I PROJECT: BLACKMORE Lot 98 ,~ Sample :td ,... ,. + <t-+ ..., <t- I "O " -.c U) QI Ul 0 + ::L ·-.0 3 (/) .a Q. -"O L 0 u e I QI :, C :, -(/) Jl a 11'.l :::,+ 11'.l :::, (/) ~ ML I 16 ~ 25 CL -1· 5-a 17 - 1· - -- -,,. 10- -· - 1· - --- -,. 15- - 1· - -., ,. - 20- - I - :.-• - I - 25- . -- I - - I - Lot 98 I' ,... ~ ,... ..., + ~ :::i: ..., C 0 + QI ·-,... L + ·c ... :, 111 :::, 0 + L Q. Ul :, Jl..., ·-+ L 0 111 a I: (/) 106.7 16.3 111.6 6.2 BORING LOG W.O. 2474-A-SC BORING B-1 SHEET_1_OF DATE EXCAVATED _____ 6_-_10_-_9_8 ___ _ SAMPLE METHOD: 140 lb hammer 30" drop m Standard Penetration Test ~ Undisturbed, Ring Sample ~ Water Seepage into hole Description of Material ARTIFICIAL FILL @ O', CLAYEY SILT, olive brown, moist, soft. @ 2', c:1s per O', stiff. SANTIAGO FORMATION @ 3', CLA YSTONE, greenish brown, moist, very stiff; roots, weathered, iron oxide staining. @ 5', as per 3' Total Depth = 6 1 /2' No groundwater encountered Backfilled 6-1 0-98 GeoSoils, Inc. PLATE B-1 I: :_\1,1 I 1· 1· I 1· ,~ I'· I ,~ 1· I· I GeoSoils, Inc. PROJECT: BLACKMORE Lot 98 Sample '"' . +- '+-+-,., '+-I 'C '---.r. UI QJ UI 0 +-.>!. ·-.0 3 V) .0 a. -'C l.. 0 u e QJ :I C: :I -V, :n 0 al ::i +-al ::i V, ML - - - 5- - - - - 10- - - - - 15- - - - - 20- - - - - 25- - - - - Lot 98 BORING LOG w.o. 2474-A-SC BORING B-2 SHEET_1_OF 1 - DATE EXCAVATED 6-10-98 '"' SAMPLE METHOD: 140 lb hammer 30" drop ~ '"' ,., +-~ m 3 ,., C: Standard Penetration Test 0 +-Ill ·-~ Water Seepage into hole '"' L +-'i: '+-:I "' ~ Undisturbed, Ring Sample ::i 0 +-L a. UI :I J) V ·-+- L 0 "' Description of Material 0 I: V) SANTIAGO FORMATION @ O', SANDY SILTSTONE, olive brown, soft, damp; highly weathered. @ 1 ', grades to moist, stiff. @ 2', grades to very stiff. r Total Depth = 3' No groundwater encountered Backfilled 6-1 0-98 ~ GeoSoils, Inc. PLATE B-2 I 1- 1 .1- 1 1- 1 1- 1 1. ~' I I GeoSoils, Inc. PROJECT: BLACKMORE Lot 98 Sample ,... + ::i: + .... + + ..., .... ,... I -0 '--·,:ci- .c: (I) Ql (I) 0 :J u + :.!. ·-.0 3 en .a a. a. --0 l. 0 (.J s J) ..., a, ::1 C: :::J -en:» l. Cl co :J + co :J en Cl ML - - - 5- - - - - 10- - - - - 15- - - - - 20- - - - - 25- - - - - Lot 98 BORING LOG w.o . 2474-A-SC • BORING B-3 SHEET_1_OF 1 - DATE EXCAVATED 6-10-98 ,... SAMPLE METHOD: 140 lb hammer 30" drop ~ ,... ..., ~ m ..., C: Standard Penetration Test 0 a, ·-/:\j Water Seepage into hole l. + ::1 111 ~ Undisturbed, Ring Sample + l. (I) ::1 ·-+ 0 111 Description of Material I: en SANTIAGO FORMATION @ O', SANDY SILTSTONE, olive brown, soft, damp; highly weathered. @ 1 ', grades to moist, stiff. @ 2', grades to very stiff. r Total Depth = 3' No groundwater encountered Backfilled 6-1 0-98 GeoSoils, Inc. PLATE B-3 .:.._•::· ..... ·.,i· .. .-. '. . ' __ ,·; . \ ,., ; ' • • .,.,pa_ t .. I ,. Ii'.:_·~ . : ... ... : ~ · .... :,· . _. ' ·,1 .. I J ._• ~-< ,.~ .. '.. ·'· ~ ......... ' ·,· :.. . . . . •'/· · .. · . .,, ........ : -. / f ... _-.: .-. '- -,;,~. ~ . •'. .; ' _ _.,_:-, ~ ; ~ . =.-:---.··· .··'·. . _-.,;· > ~·, ~ ·. --. .. ' . ··-t -_~ .. I,,.··:-'.'~:-·., .. _ .. -· . ::_:.:_·} : _.,. ,:"_';-_,, ~. . . ··r: 1,:-_: .. ,~-~ -: __ , Ii -..;:Y 1- ·1 I I . ' . .- .· :· .... ' .: :; -~·,_ ..... ~ .-----~~_:;. .... :-. ... .__ ,,.,~- / ,. .... <-_ ...... :. ,. ·,. .!, •• APPEND.IXC :.-·· ·LAB.ORATORY.TEST -RESULTS . . ' . . •""··· ... ::. _ .. . ~-- ' ,. ·' ' . -- ' .. -.,:-...::· . .• £· •• -~ ... ~-. .. ... ' ' . ·.,·· .. ..·-... . .' .· ,1. ···.-. t ..• :-..,. .. . . -~ ... -.. .: ,.-:. "-!,. -<;-_; ·_ .. _i, ,, . -. . . ·, ~.: . . .. .~.:-...... .... : ~- , .. ·,., -'· ····-. :.· ., .. "; . ,·.: 1, t 1-· 1- :~~5- I 1-· I I I 1· I I I _ -~ r ~,-:-~ 6100 Quail Valley Court Riverside, CA 92507 · ·· '·!.-· ;_/ l~~-0 \ P.O. Box 432 Riverside, CA 92502 ; PH (909) 653-3351 FAX (909) 653-1662 fnvironmental Laboratory Certification #1156 .• ~, E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. ESTABl.lSHEO 1906 'I -. ..-.,r. I ,. ":.·-.-.. ----,-...... -,,,,.==· 2277 Client: GeoSoils, Inc. r::,:1~£~;~~-::;f:':::£~:~:~-~:§::1:=~=-6,.i,.::·-~:~ -··:· ~ ~ 3 1 · 5741 Palmer Way Carlsbad,CA 92008 Client I.D.: soil-ag as listed Identification Collected Ion Chrom. Date Time water Extractable sulfate ppm .· : RL: -·--.-::-:2·to s. Date Reported: 06/30/98 Submitted By: UPS Date: 06/18/98 Time: 083'5 ·:=·-· :_:::.=-_:_···._:.-~_::\.:·: :~;· :::: .··· ::::···:··: ·:· _:-•, ... · .. : :·:· - ,,.·· Date analysis completed: (Water Extractable Sulfate:06/24/98) ND= None detected at RL (Reporting Limit). Results repoted in ppm expressed on air dired soil basis. cc: Plate C-1 . . -.. • " -.. . ·-· ·1'·· ·,· ..... ' -... ~ :~J .. ': :~ ..... :, :·.., I,.'\,\·,.---~_,. .. _ . _._ .. _.,, '-..,--,1·_ . --:: ... ~:-;,,.: .: .: r·.;_·_: .. _·; ··~ 1-': / " I:.·:: /_:}>". . . ~· .,, . ---;"'•' ...... ' • "'•~,.I • ~ ',· .:; · ... -.· •. ' I ·: .. ·· 1- 1.·· . .,_, I I I I ,~ ' , • -,,I' . ' . . ; .·-.· :APPENDIXD ..· ,{ - ... . ..... ... -.. ~ ... ~ ' ; '·: .: ' ... · - .Cl'ENERAL 'EARTHWORK AND-GRADING GUIDELINES:· ..• :· l ·-. '•. • • • : •• .-• ..... •• -• ·: --. : : •• ·_, •• "i-• -, ·:,.. .· .... . ~ : ••.:-.•"'-.•'.' .I'· •• .: . ·-· .. : : ~:.- ' • ,:_ 1• • ., -~ • ., ~ .. .. :-' . ~- . \ .... ·, . ~-.. . ~-.. .... , :• .. ~-;·· ~~:,i',· " . : .. .. I: I 1- 1 ,,;,.J 1- 1 I I I' 1- 1-- I 1·· I 1· --· I I I I GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES General These guidelines present general procedures and requirements for earthwork and grading as shown on the approved grading plans, including preparation of areas to filled, placement of fill, installation of subdrains and excavations. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical report are part of the earthwork and grading guidelines and would supersede the provisions contained hereafter in the case of conflict. Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in new recommendations which could supersede these guidelines or the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. The contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with provisions of the project plans and specifications. The project soil engineer and engineering geologist (geotechnical consultant) or their representatives should provide observation and testing services, and geotechnical consultation during the duration of the project. EARTHWORK OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING Geotechnical Consultant Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant (soil engineer and engineering geologist) should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, the approved grading plans, and applicable grading codes and ordinances. The geotechnical consultant should provide testing and observation so that determination may be made that the work is being accomplished as specified. It is the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultants and keep them apprised of anticipated work schedules and changes, so that they may schedule their personnel accordingly. All clean-outs, prepared ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be observed and documented by the project engineering geologist and/or soil engineer prior to placing and fill. It is the contractors's responsibility to notify the engineering geologist and soil engineer when such areas are ready for observation. Laboratory and Field Tests Maximum dry density tests to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with American Standard Testing Materials test method ASTM designation D-1557-78. Random field compaction tests should be performed in accordance with test method ASTM designation D-1556-82, D-2937 or D-2922 and D-3017, at intervals of approximately 2 feet of fill height or every 100 cubic yards of fill placed. These criteria GeoSoils, Ine. 1· 1- 1 I: --~ 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1·· 1- 1· 1· 1· I I I I would vary depending on the soil conditions and the size of the project. The location and frequency of testing would be at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant. Contractor's Responsibility All clearing, site preparation, and earthwork performed on the project should be conducted by the contractor, with observation by geotechnical consultants and staged approval by the governing agencies, as applicable. It is the contractor's responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fill, to the satisfaction of the soil engineer, and to place, spread, moisture condition, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer. The contractor should also remove all major non- earth material considered unsatisfactory by the soil engineer. lt_is the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with applicable grading guidelines, codes or agency ordinances, and approved grading plans. Sufficient watering apparatus and compaction equipment should be provided by the contractor with due consideration for the fill material, rate of placement, and climatic conditions. If, in the opinion of the geotechnical consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable weather, excessive oversized rock, or deleterious material, insufficient support equipment, etc., are resulting in a quality of work that is not acceptable, the consultant will inform the contractor, and the contractor is expected to rectify the conditions, and if necessary, stop work until conditions are satisfactory. During construction, the contractor shall properly grade ail surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The contractor shall take remedial measures to control surface water and to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. SITE PREPARATION All major vegetation, including brush, trees, thick grasses, organic debris, and other deleterious material should be removed and disposed of off-site. These removals must be concluded prior to placing fill. Existing fill, soil, alluvium, colluvium, or rock materials determined by the soil engineer or engineering geologist as being unsuitable in-place should be removed prior to fill placement. Depending upon the soil conditions, these materials may be reused as compacted fills. Any materials incorporated as part of the compacted fills should be approved by the soil engineer. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines, or other structures not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner recommended by the soil engineer. Soft, dry, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition should be over-excavated down to General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Ine. Appendix D Page2 I. I I I ~ • ..;.J 1- 1 I 1- 1- .1- 1- 1- 1· I 1- 1 I I I firm ground and approved by the soil engineer before compaction and filling operations continue. Overexcavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed and moisture conditioned should be re-compacted to the minimum relative compaction as specified in these guidelines. Existing ground which is determined to be satisfactory for support of the fills should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches or as directed by the soil engineer. After the scarified ground is brought to optimum moisture content or greater· and mixed, the materials should be compacted as specified herein. If the scarified zone is grater that 6 inches in depth, it may be necessary to remove the excess and place the material in lifts restricted to about 6 inches in compacted thickness. Existing ground which is not satisfactory to support compacted fill should be over- excavated as required in the geotechnical report or by the on-site soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Scarification, disc harrowing, or other acceptable form of mixing should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large lumps or clods, until the working surface is reasonably uniform and free from ruts, hollow, hummocks, or other uneven features which would inhibit compaction as described previously. Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be stepped or benched. The lowest bench, which will act as a key, should be a minimum of 15 feet wide and should be at least 2 feet deep into firm material, and approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. In fill over cut slope conditions, the recommended minimum width of the lowest bench or key is also 15 feet with the key founded on firm material, as designated by the Geotechnical Consultant. As a general rule, unless specifically recommended otherwise by the Soil Engineer, the minimum width of fill keys should be approximately equal to ½ the height of the slope. Standard benching is generally 4 feet (minimum) vertically, exposing firm, acceptable material. Benching may be used to remove unsuitable materials, although it is understood that the vertical height of the bench may exceed 4 feet. Pre-stripping may be considered for unsuitable materials in excess of 4 feet in thickness. All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and the toe of fill benches should be observed and approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist prior to placement of fill. Fills may then be properly placed and compacted until design grades (elevations) are attained. COMPACTED FILLS Any earth materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized in the fill provided that each material has been determined to be suitable by the soil engineer. These materials should be free of roots, tree branches, other organic matter or other deleterious materials. All unsuitable materials should be removed from the fill as directed General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp 7\2400\247 4a.pge GeoSoils, lne. Appendix D Page3 I; I I' I -$,~1 I 1· 1- 1- 1- I 1· I I I 1-_, I I I I by the soil engineer. Soils of poor gradation, undesirable expansion potential, or substandard strength characteristics may be designated by the consultant as unsuitable and may require blending with other soils to serve as a satisfactory fill material. Fill materials derived from benching operations should be dispersed throughout the fill area and blended with other bedrock derived material. Benching operations should not result in the benched material being placed only within a single equipment width away from the fill/bedrock contact. Oversized materials defined as rock or other irreducible materials with a maximum dimension greater than 12 inches should not be buried or placed in fills unless the location of materials and disposal methods are specifically approved by the soil engineer. Oversized material should be taken off-site or placed in accordance with recommendations of the soil engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. Oversized material should not be placed within 1 O feet vertically of finish grade (elevation) or within 20 feet horizontally of slope faces. To facilitate future trenching, rock should not be placed within the range of foundation excavations, future utilities, or underground construction unless specifically approved by the soil engineer and/or the developers representative. If import material is required for grading, representative samples of the materials to be utilized as compacted fill should be analyzed in the laboratory by the soil engineer to determine its physical properties. If any material other thaFl that previously tested is encountered during grading, an appropriate analysis of this material should be conducted by the soil engineer as soon as possible. Approved fill material should be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in near horizontal layers that when compacted should not exceed 6 inches in thickness. The soil engineer may approve thick lifts if testing indicates the grading procedures are such that adequate compaction is being achieved with lifts of greater thickness. Each layer should be spread evenly and blended to attain uniformity of material and moisture suitable for compaction. Fill layers at a moisture content less than optimum should be watered and mixed, and wet fill layers should be aerated by scarification or should be blended with drier material. Moisture condition, blending, and mixing of the fill layer should continue until the fill materials have a uniform moisture content at or above optimum moisture. After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture conditioned and mixed, it should be uniformly compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM test designation, D-1557-78, or as otherwise recommended by the soil engineer. Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and should be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified degree of compaction. General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. Appendix D Page4 I: I: I' 1- ·~.;;; I I' 1- 1- I 1- 1 1· I 1- 1 .._; I I I I Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction, or improper moisture is in evidence, the particular layer or portion shall be re-worked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill shall be placed in an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements, and is approved by the soil engineer. Compaction of slopes should be accomplished by over-building a minimum of 3 feet horizontally, and subsequently trimming back to the design slope configuration. Testing shall be performed as the fill is elevated to evaluate compaction as the fill core is being developed. Special efforts may be necessary to attain the specified compaction in the fill slope zone. Final slope shaping should be performed by trimming and removing loose materials with appropriate equipment. A final determination of fill slope compaction should be based on observation and/or testing of the finished slope face. Where compacted fill slopes are designed steeper than 2: 1 (horizontal to vertical), specific material types, a higher minimum relative compaction, and special grading procedures, may be recommended. If an alternative to over-building and cutting back the compacted fill slopes is selected, then special effort should be made to achieve the required compaction in the outer 1 O feet of each lift of fill by undertaking the following: 4. An extra piece of equipment consisting of a heavy short shanked sheepsfoot should be used to roll (horizontal) parallel to the slopes continuously as fill is placed. The sheepsfoot roller should also be used to roll perpendicular to the slopes, and extend out over the slope to provide adequate compaction to the face of the slope. 2. 3. Loose fill should not be spilled out over the face of the slope as each lift is compacted. Any loose fill spilled over a previously completed slope face should be trimmed off or be subject to re-rolling. Field compaction tests will be made in the outer (horizontal) 2 to 8 feet of the slope at appropriate vertical intervals, subsequent to compaction operations. 4. After completion of the slope, the slope face should be shaped with a small tractor and then re-rolled with a sheepsfoot to achieve compaction to near the slope face. Subsequent to testing to verify compaction, the slopes should be grid-rolled to achieve compaction to the slope face. Final testing should be used to confirm compaction after grid rolling. 5. Where testing indicates less than adequate compaction, the contractor will be responsible to rip, water, mix and re-compact the slope material as necessary to achieve compaction. Additional testing should be performed to verify compaction. General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. Appendix D Pages ·I. I· I I ::,f,iJ I I 1· 1- 1· 1· 1· 1- 1· 1- 1. ...., I I I I 6. Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer in compliance with ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendation of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION Subdrains should be installed in approved ground in accordance with the approximate alignment and details indicated by the geotechnical consultant. Subdrain locations or materials should not be changed or modified without approval of the geotechnical consultant. The soil engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend and direct changes in subdrain line, grade and drain material in the field, pending exposed conditions. The location of constructed subdrains should be recorded by the project civil engineer. EXCAVATIONS Excavations and cut slopes should be examined during grading by the engineering geologist. If directed by the engineering geologist, further excavations or overexcavation and re-filling of cut areas should be performed and/or remedial grading of cut slopes should be performed. When fill over cut slopes are to be graded, unless otherwise approved, the cut portion of the slope should be observed by the engineering geologist prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope. The engineering geologist should observe all cut slopes and should be notified by the contractor when cut slopes are started. If, during the course of grading, unforeseen adverse or potential adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the engineering geologist and soil engineer should investigate, evaluate and make recommendations to treat these problems. The need for cut slope buttressing or stabilizing should be based on in-grading evaluation by the engineering geologist, whether anticipated or not. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes should be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. Additionally, short-term stability of temporary cut slopes is the contractors responsibility . Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer and should be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, Inc. Appendix D Page6 1· I I I I' I ,. I I ,~ 1· 1·· I 1· I ~ 1· I I I COMPLETION Observation, testing and consultation by the geotechnical consultant should be conducted during the grading operations in order to state an opinion that all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved project specifications. After completion of grading and after the soil engineer and engineering geologist have finished their observations of the work, final reports should be submitted subject to review by the controlling governmental agencies. No further excavation or filling should be undertaken without prior notification of the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. All finished cut and fill slopes should be protected from erosion and/or be planted in accordance with the project specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. Such protection and/or planning should be undertaken as soon as practical after completion of grading. JOB SAFETY General At GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) getting the job done safely is of primary concern. The following is the company's safety considerations for use by all employees on multi-employer construction sites. On ground personnel are at highest risk of injury and possible fatality on grading and construction projects. GSI recognizes that construction activities will vary on each site and that site safety is the prime responsibility of the contractor; however, everyone must be safety conscious and responsible at all times. To achieve our goal o_f avoiding accidents, cooperation between the client, the contractor and GSI personnel must be maintained. In an effort to minimize risks associated with geotechnical testing and observation, the following precautions are to be implemented for the safety of field personnel on grading and construction projects: Safety Meetings: GSI field personnel are directed to attend contractors regularly scheduled and documented safety meetings. Safety Vests: Safety Flags: Safety vests are provided for and are to be worn by GSI personnel at all times when they are working in the field. Two safety flags are provided to GSI field technicians; one is to be affixed to the vehicle when on site, the other is to be placed atop the spoil pile on all test pits. General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge Appendix D Page7 GeoSoils, Ine. I I I I .. ~~., I I I 1· I I I I I I I I I I I Flashing Lights: All vehicles stationary in the grading area shall use rotating or flashing amber beacon, or strobe lights, on the vehicle during all field testing. While operating a vehicle in the grading area, the emergency flasher on the vehicle shall be activated. In the event that the contractor1s representative observes any of our personnel not following the above, we request that it be brought to the attention of our office . Test Pits Location. Orientation and Clearance The technician is responsible for selecting test pit locations. A primary concern should be the technicians1s safety. Efforts will be made to coordinate locations with the grading contractors authorized representative, and to select locations following or behind the established traffic pattern, preferably outside of current traffic. The contractors authorized representative (dump· man, operator, supervisor, grade checker, etc.) should direct excavation of the pit and safety during the test period. Of paramount concern should be the soil technicians safety and obtaining enough tests to represent the fill. Test pits should be excavated so that the spoil pile is placed away form oncoming traffic, whenever possible. The technician's vehicle is to be placed next to the test pit, opposite the spoil pile. This necessitates the fill be maintained in a driveable condition. Alternatively, the contractor may wish to park a piece of equipment in front of the test holes, particularly in small fill areas or those with limited access. A zone of non-encroachment should be established for all test pits. No grading equipment should enter this zone during the testing procedure. The zone should extend approximately 50 feet outward from the center of the test pit. This zone is established for safety and to avoid excessive ground vibration which typically decreased test results. When taking slope tests the technician should park the vehicle directly above or below the test location. If this is not possible, a prominent flag should be placed at the top of the slope. The contractor's representative should effectively keep all equipment at a safe operation distance (e.g. 50 feet) away from the slope during this testing. The technician is directed to withdraw from the active portion of the fill as soon as possible following testing. The technician's vehicle should be parked at the perimeter of the fill in a highly visible location, well away from the equipment traffic pattern. The contractor should inform our personnel of all changes to haul roads, cut and fill areas or other factors that may affect site access and site safety. In the event that the technicians safety is jeopardized or compromised as a result of the contractors failure to comply with any of the above, the technician is required, by company policy, to immediately withdraw and notify his/her supervisor. The grading contractors representative will eventually be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. However, in the General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. Appendix D Pages ': I I I ':.f_:., I I 1·· 1·· 1·: ---· ,-, I 1·· I I I. 1· I I I interim, no further testing will be performed until the situation is rectified. Any fill place can be considered unacceptable and subject to reprocessing, recompaction or removal. In the event that the soil technician does not comply with the above or other established safety guidelines, we request that the contractor brings this to his/her attention and notify this office. Effective communication and coordination between the contractors representative and the soils technician is strongly encouraged in order to implement the above safety plan. Trench and Vertical Excavation It is the contractor's responsibility to provide safe access into trenches where compaction testing is needed. Our personnel are directed not to enter any excavation or vertical cut which 1) is 5 feet or deeper unless shored or laid back, 2) displays any evidence of instability, has any loose rock or other debris which could fall into the trench, or 3) displays any other evidence of any unsafe conditions regardless of depth. All trench excavations or vertical cuts in excess of 5 feet deep, which any person enters, should be shored or laid back. · Trench access should be provided in accordance with CAL-OSHA and/or state and local standards. Our personnel are directed not to enter any trench by being lowered or 11riding down" on the equipment. If the contractor fails to provide safe access to trenches for compaction testing, our company policy requires that the soil technician withdraw and notify his/her supervisor. The contractors representative will eventually be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. All backfill not tested due to safety concerns or other reasons could be subject to reprocessing and/or removal. If GSI personnel become aware of anyone working beneath an unsafe trench wall or vertical excavation, we have a legal obligation to put the contractor and owner/developer on notice to immediately correct the situation. If corrective steps are not taken, GSI then has an obligation to notify CAL-OSHA and/or the proper authorities. General Earthwork and Grading Guidelines File: e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. Appendix D Page9 I I: I I. ·?~ I I I I I I 1· I 1· I I I I I I CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL TYPE A ', PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL ' ' ',,,----NATURAL GROUND TYPE 8 ------~-------------~--------- , PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL ' '\, -'-', _,,,,,-NATURAL GROUND -=~ ~ 11,\\\ ', //; ,. ',,_ -. ..... _____ __ SEE ALTERNATIVES NOTE: ALTERNATIVES. LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SUBORAINS SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. PLATE EG-1 I 1 CANYON SUBDRAJN ALTERNATE DETAILS I I ALTERNATE t PERFORATED PIPE AND FILTER MATERIAL -~~ I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-1 -FILTER MATERIAL, . StEVE SJZE PERCENT PASSING 1 INCH , 100 ·3/4 INCH 90"'.':100 3/8 INCH 40-100 NO. 4 25-40. NO. 8 18-33 .No. 30 :s-15· ·No. 50 .0-7. NO.200 0-3 ALTERNATE 2: PERFORATED PI_PE, GRAVEL ANO. FILTER FABRIC ~NIMUM OVERLAP s· MINIMUM OVER~)f A-2 PERFORATED PIPE: SEE ALTERNATE 1 GRAVEL: CLEAN 3/ l. INCH ROC< OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE FILTER FABRIC: MIRAFI 140 OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE PLATE EG-2 I I I I -.'::.~ 1· 1· I I 1· 1· I ,. _, ,. 1· I -~ I I I I DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON FLAT ALLUVIA TED CANYON TOE OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN ) COMPACTED FiLL ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE TO BE ~RESTORED WITH COMPACTED FILL _ 2-::~Gl:i._:~~u.'.:A~ BACXCU~ VARIES. FOR DEEP REMOVALS, /......f..v; r BACl<CUT =1~SHOULO BE MADE NO {,$'~ STEE?ER ·THA~F1 OR AS NECESSAR~ <':' ANTICIPATED ALLUVIAL REMOVAL FOR SAFETY '--~'-CONSIDERATIONS.., l ~ , DEPTH PER SOIL EHGINEER. °'Ii/\ // '¾M~ovioO t1 -UM ;;;o:;;cTION7'.;,;" r;;i iw" SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN TO THE RECOMMENDED REMOVAL DEPTH. SLOPE HEIGHT. SITE CONDITIONS AND/OR LOCAL CONDITIONS COULD DICTATE FLATTER PROJECTIONS. REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL ADJOINING CANYON FILL ------------------ PROPOSED ADDITIONAL COMPACTED FlLL COMPACTED FlLL LIMITS LIN~\ · , TEMPORARY COMPACTED Flll ~ --- )., FOR DRAINAGE ONLY ------ ?' ~ Oaf ~d, Oaf / Oal (TO BE REMOVED) (EXISTING COMPA,TEO FILL!-. :2.~WlJ~~~~~~/r:--\ ~<"JP"(, ~Y\ 'f/1' • • LEGEND ~/~\ :;.,-TO BE REMOVED BEFORE Oaf ARTIFICIAL FJLL PLACING ADDITIONAL COMPACTED FILL Oaf ALLUVIUM PLATE EG-3 1-1~1-:-~~l~!~!~i~t~!~-~.~:~:~~ ~;~\~ -u r )> -I m m G> I +- TYPICAL STABILIZATION / BUTTRESS FILL DETAIL 15' TYPICAL OUTLETS TO BE SPACED AT 100' MAXIMUM INTERVALS, AND SHALL EXTEND 12· BEYOND THE FACE OF SLOPE AT TIME OF. ROUGH GRADING COMPLETION. 14 ., 15'MINIMUM BLANKET FILL IF RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER DESIGN FINISH SLOPE ~ ~,,\w;mm----__ ~ , -4• DIAMETER NON-PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE .-1. ANO BACKDRAIN (SEE ALTERNATIVES) r.ll'·\ J'MINIMUM KEY DEPTH 1~1-(--(~i-l~l-:~:-1-.~:-~ -t--·-·- TYPICAL STABILIZATION / BUTTRESS SUBDRAIN DETAIL L.. MINIMUM 2. MINIMUM PIPE 7J r )> -t m m G> l U1 :E ::, ~ Z: :E N r MINIMUM FILTER MATERIAL: MINIMUM OF FIVE FP /LINEAR Ft OF PIPF OR FOUR FP/LINEAR Ft OF PIPE WHEN PLACED IN SQUARE CUT TRENCH, .AI.J{;RNAT!VE IN UEU OF FILTER MATERIAL: GRAVEL MAY BE ENCASED IN APPROVED FILTER FABRIC. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 140 OR EQUIVALENT. FILTER FABRIC \ SJJALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 1 r ON ALL JOINTS. MINIMUM 4. DIAMETER PIPE: ABS-ASTM 0-2751, SOR 35 OR ASTM D-1527 SCHEDULE 40 PVC-ASTM D-303L., SPR 35 OR ASTM 0-1785 SCHEDULE 40 WITH A CRUSHING STRENGTH OF 1,000 POUNDS MINIMUM, AND A MINIMUM OF 8 UNIFORMLY SPACED PERFORATIONS PER FOOT OF PIPE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS OF BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE CAP AT ·UPSTREAM ENO OF PIPE. SLOPE AT 2 % TO OUTLET PIPE. OUTLET PIPE TO BE CONNECTED TO SUBDRAIN PIPE WITH TEE OR ELBOW. t-l>TE: 1. TRENCH FOR OUTLET PIPES TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ON-SITE SOIL. 2. BACKDRAINS AND LATERAL DRAINS SHALL BE , LOCATED AT ELEVATION OF EVERY BENCH DRAIN. FIRST DRAIN LOCATED AT ELEVATION JUST ABOVE LOWER LOT GRADE. ADDITIONAL DRAINS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT: SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING 1 INCH 100 3/ l. INCH 90-100 3/8 INCH 1.0-100 NO. I. 25-1.0 NO. 8 18-33 NO. 30 5-15 NO. 50 0-7 NO. 200 0-3 GRAVEL SHALL BE OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT: SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING 11/21NCH 100 NO. I. 5 0 N0.200 8 SAND EQUIVALENT: MINIMUM OF 50 \_\_l_ ~l~i~i-;_:_;~.~.~ -~;~~.~-~-~ FILL OVER NA TUR AL DETAIL SIDEHILL FILL COMPACTED FILL TOE OF SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN PROVIDE A 1:1 MINIMUM PROJECTION FROM DESIGN TOE OF SLOPE TO TOE OF KEY AS SHOWN ON AS BUILT t~ATURAL SLOPE TO BE RESTORED WITH ____,., 4' MINIMUM BENCH WIDTH MAY VARY ....... 1 '~.MINIM~M 7J r )> -I rn m G) l CJ) fiOTE: 1. WHERE THE NATURAL SLOPE APPROACHES OR EXCEEDS THE 2'X 3' MINIMUM KEY DEPTH 2' MINIMUM IN BEDROCK OR APPROVED MATERIAL. DESIGN SLOPE RATIO, SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS WOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 2. THE NEED FOR AND DISPOSITION OF DRAINS WOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER BASED UPON EXPOSED CONDITIONS. :~1-~~l-t~l~i~i-;·1~·~:~·--~-~~~-~.~-~ FILL OVER CUT DETAIL CUTIEILL CONTACT MAINTAIN MINIMUM 15' FILL SECTION FROM 1. AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN BACKCUT TO FACE OF FINISH SLOPE ---------- 2. AS SHOWN ON AS BUILT H ORIGINAL TOPOGRAPHY ?~ !/~\ BEDROCK OR APPROVED MATERIAL l) r )> --1 rn m G) l 'l COMPACTED FILL BENCH WIDTH MAY VARY 15' MINIMUM OR H/2 NOTE: THE CUT PORTION OF THE SLOPE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED AND EVALUATED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE FILL PORTION. !-\~!~·-t~:~1~:~l-,.1~1~.~-~.~t~:~'.~-~ -0 r )> --1 rn rn G) I 00 STABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL Hl EXPOSED IN PORTION OF CUT .SLOPE MATERIAL , NATURAL SLOPE REMOVE: UNSTABLE MATEijlAL ~ '4 . ..., ~ i«£~_.2...l}j:..'_,'E.¥ht-' , 1111>lttv1.1 va:,f'DE UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR APPROVED MATERIAL "V , _ _._f MINIMUM TILTED BACK \\ '//\VVJJ,,.;;. ~ IF RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING t4 ~ W~ GEOLOGIST, THE REMAINING CUT PORTION OF THE SLOPE MAY ~. , .. ,.-,_,_.. W1 -f/ REQUIRE REMOVAL ANO REPLACEMENT WITH COMPACTED FILL. NOTE: 1. SUBORAINS ARE NOT REQUIRED UNLESS SPECIFIED ·av SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST? 2. ·w· SHALL BE EQUIPMENT WIDTH (15'1 FOR SLOPE HEIGHTS LESS THAN 25 FEET. FOR SLOPES GREATER' THAN 25 FEET ·w· SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER AND /OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. AT NO TIME SHALL ·w· BE LESS THAN H/2. !~l~,--l~i~1~:~:~ '~ ~ ~)-~--;-:~:--~ -u ~ --t rn rn G> l lD SKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND 15' MINIMUM TO BE MAINTAINED FROM PROPOSED FINISH SLOPE FACE TO BACKCUT ~m.~ · ,, ~ i 3' MINIMUM KEY DEPTH TH / IV \yr /I\\ \1//.\ VnJ?vj7,, t.l.?.J-< ,,,.h,..., --- ORIGINAL SLOPE ~ NOTE: 1. THE NEED ANO DISPOSITION OF DRAINS WILL BE DETERMINED! BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS. 2. PAD OVEREXCAVATION AND RE COMPACTION SHOU LO BE PERFORMED IF DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. l~l~l---l~l~!~!~:~1~·~1~1-• ,.1111!11 r~ .. t .. ,IIIJJ ... -0 r )> -I rn rn G> I ~ 0 DAYLIGHT CUT LOT DETAIL RECONSTRUCT COMPACTED FILL SLOPE AT 2:1 OR FLATTER (MAY INCREASE OR DECREASE PAD AREA). OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT --- REPLACEMENT FILL AVOID AND/OR CLEAN UP SPILLAGE OF MATERIALS ON THE NATURAL SLOPE / / ____,. ~ ~ NOTE: 1. SUBDRAIN AND KEY WIDTH REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON EXPOSED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN. 2. PAO OVER EXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION SHOULD' BE PERFORMED IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. I I ~ ... 1 I --~-- I ,, I I I t· I ,, ,,· 1· .1 I -~ I I I I TRANSITION LOT DETAIL CUT LOT (MATERIAL TYPE TRANSITION) --------------- PAO GRADE COMPACTED FlLL TYPICAL BENCH ING ///\ CUT-FILL LOT (DAYLIGHT TRANSITION) MUM PAO GRADE NOTE: * DEEPER OVEREXCAVATION MAY BE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST IN STEEP CUT-FILL TRANSITION AREAS. - PLATE EG-11' I; ,,, 1· I: i:~~ I 1· I 1· I ;j;i<f ,I I ~ I ,, ,~ ;;ti I·! -; ~ I,.'! I ' -,~ tilll I - OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL VIEWS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. ROO< SHOULD NOT TOUCH AND VOIDS SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FILLED IN. VIEW NORMAL TO SLOPE FACE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE co H (8) c.o VIEW PARALLEL TO SLOPE FACE (Fl 0::, PROPOSED FtNISH GRADE t-' 1 oo· MAXIMUM (BJ~ )ta:, 3• MINIMUM C) ac:,ac:.o~ 10· MINIMUM d:X::OC:)::10:c::· ~MINIMUMO NOTE: IA) ONE EQUIPMENT WIDTH OR A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET. (G) c::.<x:O od:X::P (F) (8) HEIGHT AND WIDTH MAY VARY DEPENDING ON ROCK SIZE ANO TYPE OF EQUIPMENT USED. LENGTH OF WINDROW SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 100· MAXIMUM. co (Cl IF APPROVED BY "THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERNG GEOLOGIST t. WINDROWS MAY· BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON COMPETENT MATERIALS OR BEDROCK. PROVIDED ADEQUATE SPACE IS AVAILABLE FOR COMPACTION. (DJ ORIENTATION OF WINDROWS MAY VARY BUT SHALL BE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. STAGGERING OF WINDROWS IS NOT NECESSARY UNLESS RECOMMENDED. (El CLEAR AREA FOR UTILITY TRENCHES .. FOUNDATIONS ANO SWIMMING POOLS. · 1FJ VOIDS IN WINDROW SHALL BE FILLED BY FLOODING GRANULAR SOIL INTO PLACE. GRANULAR SOIL SHALL BE ANY SOIL WHICH HAS A UNIFlED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USC 29-1) DESIGNATION OF SM, SP, SW, GP, OR GW. ALL FlLL OVER ANO AROUND ROCK WINDROW SHALL BEi COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE 'COMPACTION. . (Gl AFTER ALL BETWEEN WINDROWS IS PLACED ANO COMPACTED WITH THE LIFT OF FlLL COVERING WINDROW, WINDROW SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED WITH A 0-9 oo·zER OR EQUIVALENT. (HJ OVERSIZED ROCK IS DEANED AS LARGER THAN 12~ AND LESS THAN 4 FEET IN SIZE •. PLATE EG-12 I' ' f; 1, :;~;; -I; I I .1· ,, -,,. I -,,: I ,1 ,f I I I I ROCK DISPOSAL PITS FILL 1,.IFTS COMPACT-ED OVER r_ :o~K~~~ ~~~:E:T..)._ __ __ I I I I I I I I COMPACTED FJLL GRANULAR MAT-ERIAL LARGE RO<* SIZE OF EXCAVATION TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH ROCK SIZE. NOTE: 1. LARGE ROCK IS DEFJNEO AS ROCK LARGER THAN 4 FEET IN MAXIMUM SIZE. 2. PIT IS EXCAVATED INTO COMPACTED ALL TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO 1/2 OF ROCK SIZE. 3. GRANULAR SOIL SHOULD BE PUSHED INTO PIT ANO OENSIFIEO BY FLOODING. USE A SHEEPSFOOT AROUND ROCK TO AID IN COMPACTION. 4. A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET OF REGULAR COMPACTED FILL SHOU LO OVER LIE EACH PIT. 5. PITS SHOULD BE SEPARATED BY AT LEAST 15 FEET HORIZONTALLY. 5. PITS SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 20 FEET OF ANY FILL SLOPE. 7. PITS SHOULD ONLY BE USED IN DEEP Fill AREAS. I I I I I I I I PLATE EG-13 I I ,, I I I I 1- I I I ' .I 11- 1 _, I ,. 1- I· SETTLEMENT PLATE AND RJSER DETAIL FINAL GRADE 2' X 2' X 1 / I.. STEEL P LATE STANDARD 3/1." PIPE NIPPLE WELDED TO TOP OF PLATE. ~----+---3/1." X 5' GALVANIZED PIPE, STANDARD PIPE THREADS TOP ANO BOTTOM. EXTENSIONS THREADED ON BOTH ENOS AND ADDED IN 5' INCREMENTS. 3 INCH SCHEDULE 1.0 PVC PIPE SLEEVE. ADO IN 5• INCREMENTS WITH GLUE JOINTS. -I r I I s· / / / I I -J...t,- I MAJNTAIN 5• CLEARANCE OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT. --L.t\rMECHANICALLY HAND COMPACT IN 2"VEfHICAL -,-,'\,-LIFTS OR ALTERNATIVE SUITABLE TO ANO -,--\.- I ____ _.. ••'------,1-..,., ACCEPTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. "' s· I I s· I I I I / / ~ I I MECHANICALLY HANO COMPACT THE INITIAL 5• VERTlCA~ W_ITHIN A S'RADIUS OF PLATE BASE. ' ' ' ' ' ~-:·.· .. :.·.·.:·.···.·.·.·.·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... BOTTOM OF CLEANOUT PROVIDE A MINIMUM 1' BEDDING OF COMPACTED SAND NOTE: 1. LOCATIONS OF SETTLEMENT PLATES SHOULD BE CLEARLY MARKED AND READILY VISIBLE (RED FLAGGED) TO EQUIPMENT OPERATORS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAINTAIN CLEARANCE OF A 5' RADIUS OF PLATE BASE ANO WITHIN S'(VERTICALl FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT. FlLL WITHIN CLEARANCE AREA SHOULD BE HANO COMPACTED TO PROJECT SPECIF1CAT10NS OR COMPACTED BY ALTERNATIVE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. AFTER 5"lVERTICALl OF FILL IS IN PLACE. CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAINTAIN A 5• RADIUS EQUIPMENT CLEARANCE FROM RISER. I.. PLACE ANO MECHANICALLY HANO COMPACT INITIAL 2' OF FILL PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL READING. 5. IN THE EVENT OF DAMAGE TO THE SETTLEMENT PLATE OR EXTENSION RESULTING FROM EQUIPMENT OPERATING WITHIN THE SPECIFIED CLEARANCE AREA. CONTRACTOR SHOULD IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING THE SETTLEMENT PLATES TO WORKING ORDER. 6. AN ALTERNATE DESIGN ANO METHOD OF INSTALLATION MAY BE PROVIDED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. PLATE EG-14 I: I .1 I I I I I I I I' I I .I: I' ....., I I I I TYPICAL SURFACE SETTLEMENT MONUMENT -.-------iL <» FlNISH GRADE ------ ~ 3/8. DIAMETER X 6. LENGTH CARRIAGE BOLT OR EQUIVALENT - !+-5• DIAMETER X 3 112• LENGTH HOLE · 3·-s· . -CONCRETE BACKFILL - 1 _ ..... PLATE EG-15 I I I I I I I I; I ,. I 1· ·~ I I Ill ,,, I I I - TEST PIT SAFETY DIAGRAM SO Fc::T S?OCL P1l.E SIDE VIEW ( NOT TO SCALE } 100 FEET J, .... UJ UJ LL 0 in ~~:~·• TES. '.~ .... T P:f....,...T. ::./t. ;-:·.:·S ::i:·.:·:·.;./:·:;.;~.::·:i:·:·.;.: Jo:,, ····'(•. •'•-' r,,:.•; •• • •• • •• ·.~·:,•·."••, .-.~-r.---=-~~-::-:.• ::: .... ·: .. ·:._-:.\·.·.,-: . .-:.•:.\•: .. 50 Fe.::T Yefet.E I I I I I / t-FUG ttf APPROXJMA TE CEMTER LL CF TEST PIT 5; 1' ( NOT TO SCALE } PLATE EG-16 I I ,, ,, I I I ,- 1 ·-- 1 I I 1· I I '-......:.. I I ,1 I OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL VIEW NORMAL TO SLOPE FACE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE 1 O' MINIMUM (El cc ~ co 00 co ~ 15' MINIMUM (A} (8) co o----=o ca 0 (G) co c::::::i o::) c::c::) cO o::xF) ViEW PARALLEL TO SLOPE FACE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE 1 O' MINIMUM (El JJ00' MAXIMUM (8~ 15• MINIMUM o:x::,, :,::,ooot.:::"4 ~ 15• MINIMUM I/ BEDROCK OR APPROVED MATERIAL NOTE: IA) ONE EQUIPMENT WIDTH OR A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET. (8} HEIGHT AND WIDTH MAY VARY DEPENDING ON ROCK SIZE ANO TYPE OF . EQUIPMENT. LENGTH OF WINDROW SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 100' MAXIMUM. (C) IF APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST, WINDROWS MAY BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON COMPETENT MATERIAL OR BEDROCK PROVIDED ADEQUATE SPACE IS AVAILABLE FOR COMPACTION. (O) ORIENTATION OF WINDROWS MAY VARY BUT SHOULD BE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. STAGGERING OF WINDROWS IS NOT NECESSARY UNLESS RECOMMENDED. {E) CLEAR AREA FOR UTILITY TRENCHES. FOUNDATIONS ANO SWIMMING POOLS. (F) ALL FILL OVER ANO AROUND ROCK WINDROW SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION OR AS RECOMMENDED. (Gl AFTER FILL BETWEEN WINDROWS IS PLACED ANO COMPACTED WITH THE LJFT OF FILL COVERING WINDROW, WINDROW SHOU LO BE PROOF ROLLED WITH A 0-9 DOZER OR EQUIVALENT. VIEWS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. ROCX SHOULD NOT TOUCH AND VOIDS SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FILLED IN. p LA TE R 0-1 I: ••' 'I: ,- 'I I I :1- ,- I 1- 1 I -; -- -1 I, .. ~ I I I I ROCK DISPOSAL PITS VIE>NS ARE OIAGRAMMA TIC ONLY. ROD< SHOULD NOT TOUCH AND VOIDS SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FILLED IN. FILL LIFTS COMPACTED OVER ROCK AFTER EMBEOMENT ,-----------1 GRANULAR MATERIAL J I ----' I ---------, ; COMPACTED FILL I SIZE OF EXCAVATION TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH ROCK SIZE I I I I I I I I I ROCK DISPOSAL LAYERS GRANULAR so1L ro ALL voms.1 FcoMPACTEO RLL OENSIFlEO BY FLOOOlNG ,-----------... ,-, ~ . LAYER ONE ROCK HIGH (10mJO~ -. ---------------------------- .Io· MINIMUM OR BELOW LOWEST UTJU o-o::x:x:x::c_xz_l::_n)oc:-xx:)::qoc-"°"'.',., 2 o· .... , t---~ PROPOSED FINISH GRADE PROFILE ALONG LA YER ' 0::::CC:x::;o:::,O::a:;~~OOQQCC(:X,~O'..._,. COMPACTED FILL ', FILL SLOPE LAYER ONE ROCK HIGH PLATE RD-2 1,:-··,\·.,,. - • -.. '~,-•• • I • • . ~--~ . - -. ,I •••• ..... """:.-'!. • "1_ .. /. \ . .. ":-r _ ... ._,,. ... :-. ... ,·· ... I',·~·-/ .. _:,.· ' •• ~ .,. ~. ~?. --~ :•_ .::: ·. -·--. .......... •:· . . I;-;-__ · .... ,._ .. . . .... ·: . :.· . ~." . . ., . . . .. ~ '-•h: . I·\,·_:\ ___ ,'.} ')/: --:-,' ··· . .::_ ... .... . ~ .. , -.. - I .. -_;'..;_"-_ : :::-·:·1'-... -.,.... . ~-.. ~·..:. ·_:. ·;~·. ·: ·- 1 . .-.~-· C --. . . . _·_:.· I.·.·.,. .. : ,;· ~ . ".,,··, ·.:- -, I I ·I --. 1 ... I '-·· -~--.~ ..... ~ _ .... ...... :-. • • _•, I .. . , . 7 ;:.t ~-... ! . .. ~. •:• ·.·. -:,- .. ,;., . : ·. : .. .... _ ... .. :_- ...... . .. ; _. ,· _·.' ,· '. ., ,.·. .APPENDIX E ' . ,,._. .... -. 'I., • ·-· _. '· ;, .. ~ " - :-·· :.• .. : ... -> :-. • . . ... ·:,. . .-: . ·. ,._. ,·.(···· . .... ·.· . • ;-· t .... ,,. .,_ ·~ ' .. ·--.·. . : .. -.... .. :;~ .'? . . _: ·~ .. ' -.... " ..... '.' ', \ . __ ,; I' 'I: .. ·~-,, 11 I I: I; ,, I I I _,_ I ,.1 --" ,,- 11 I I APPENDIX E Pavement Grading Recommendations General All section changes should be properly transitioned. If adverse conditions are encountered during the preparation of subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. · Subgrade Within street and parking areas, all surficial deposits of loose soil material should be removed and recompacted as recommended. After the loose soils are removed, the bottom is to be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted to 95 percent of maximum laboratory density, as determined by ASTM test designation D-1557. Deleterious material, excessively wet or dry pockets, concentrated zones of oversized rock fragments, and any other unsuitable materials encountered during grading should be removed. The compacted fill material should then be brought to the elevation of the proposed subgrade for the pavement. The subgrade should be proof-rolled in order to ensure a uniformly firm and unyielding surface. All grading and fill placement should be observed by the project soil engineer and/or his representative. Base/Sub base Compaction tests are required for the recommended base/subbase section. Minimum relative compaction required will be 95 percent of the maximum laboratory density as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-1557. Base/subbase aggregate should be in accordance to the 11Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction11 (green book) current edition. Paving Prime coat may be omitted if all of the following conditions are met: 1 . The asphalt pavement layer is placed within two weeks of completion of base and/or subbase course. 2. Traffic is not routed over completed base before paving. GeoSoils, Inc. I I I I :~::- 1 I I I; I· I· I· ; I I I· I· I ,, I I 3. Construction is completed during the dry season of May through October. 4. The base is free of dirt and debris. If construction is performed during the wet season of November through April, prime coat may be omitted if no rain occurs between completion of base course and paving and the time between completion of base and paving is reduced to three days, provided the base is free of dirt and debris. Where prime coat has been omitted and rain occurs, traffic is routed over base course, or paving is delayed, measures shall be taken to restore base course, subbase course, and subgrade to conditions that will meet specifications as directed by the soil engineer. Drainage Positive drainage should be provided for all surface water to drain towards the area swale, curb and gutter, or to an approved drainage channel. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Water should not be allowed to pond or seep into the ground. If planters or landscaping are adjacent to paved areas, measures should be taken to minimize the potential for water to enter the pavement section. The Blackmore Company e:\wp7\2400\2474a.pge GeoSoils, lne. Appendix E Page2 r1 rl rl 6 . Base Map: Grading Plans for Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24, Carlsbad Research ,Center Unit 5, by Rick Engineering Company, 1-26-95. Af LEGEND Artificial fill, placed· under the observation and testing of Geotechnics Incorporated (1994) Tse 1iertiary Santiago Formation ----------- B -3 ~ TD3' ~pproximate location of geologic contact Approximate location and total depth of exploratory boring /Fl :·~·0 ~~~~,~~~- LOS ANGELES CO. RIVERSIDE CO. ORANGE CO. SAN DIEGO CO. GEOTECHNICAL MAP Plate 1 W.O. 2474-A-SC DATE 7 /98 SCALE _1H:50' 1!te Btackmore Company November 14, 2002 Mr. Michael Grim Senior Planner CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 RE: NOISE SURVEY INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE LOTS 98 AND 99 OF CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER Dear Mr. Grim: I I" \ . I I \ lnvitrogen Corporation recently finished their second thorough noise survey at the above referenced locations. Enclosed please find a compete set of the Environmental Noise Sampling Report for your records. , As you will see, lnvitrogen has completed their due diligence in establishing that the sound emitted by their operations is within the required noise standards of the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan. We hope these findings are satisfactory to the City of Carlsbad and at this time, we will assume no further action is required on lnvitrogen's part. Please review the report and confirm that lnvitrogen is in conformance with the required noise standards. Thank you for your attention and cooperation. If you have any questions, please let us know. Sincerely, Colleen M. Blackmore THE BLACKMORE COMPANY CC: Ric Longo, lnvitrogen Corporation F:IDATA\Colleen\Misc. Tenant Correspondence\Blackmore Signal Hill\Lot 98\Mike Grim.City of Carlsbad.Sound testing again.111502.doc 1530 Faraday Avenue • Suite 170 • Carlsbad, California 92008 • phone 760.804.9600 • fax 760.804.9607 0 ~i I nvitrogen· lnvitrogen Corporation 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 P: 760 603 7200 life technologies November 13, 2002 Attn: Colleen M. Blackmore The Blackmore Company Suite 170 1530 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Lots 98 and 99 of Carlsbad Research Center Dear Colleen: F: 760 602 6500 www.invitrogen.com Invitrogen Corporation has performed a thorough nose survey to determine if the uses at Lots 98 and 99 are in conformance with the required noise standards of the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan. The survey focused on 4 locations near the property lines that are adjacent to the lots in questions. The survey totaled 32 hours of sampling in 8-hour intervals over 4 days. The data collected indicates that Invitrogen has met the required noise standards of the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan. Thanks you for your time and patience in allowing Invi trogen to perform a thorough evaluation of the Lot 98 and 99. Health and Safety Manager Invitrogen Corporation Enclosures: Lot 98 and 99 Environmental Noise Sampling Report Location of Samples Calibration Reports cc. Troy Gardner • ~i lnvitrogen™ life technologies Scope of Study 1 Lot 98 an 99 Environmental Noise Sampling Report Conducted on October 21-24, 2002 by Ric Longo of lnvitrogen Corporation According to the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan, the noise emanating from a use cannot exceed certain noise levels, based upon the duration of the noise events. For example, noise levels cannot exceed 70 dBA for more then 30 minutes in any hour, or 75 dBA for more than 15 minutes in any hour, or 80 dBA for more than 5 minutes in any hour. Tl}.e areas behind Lots 98 and 99 are a "special treatment area" which has stricter noise standards that the remainder of the specific plan area. These noise standards follow the time duration regulations above, however they start at 60 dBA. Therefore, noise levels should not exceed 60dBA for more than 30 minutes in any hour, or 65 dBA for more than 15 minutes in any hour, etc. Definitions DBA-sound level in decibels read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. The A-scale discriminates against low frequencies, as does the human ear, and is therefore used for this purpose. TWA-is the time weighted average calculated for the entire sampling period. Lavg-is the average sound level for the measurement period based on the 5 dB exchange rate. Lmax-is the maximum sound level for the measurement period based on the 5dB exchange rate. Sampling Strategy The noise dosimeter was placed in four locations near the property line behind 161 0(Lot 99) and 1620 (Lot 98) Faraday Avenue (see Appendix B). The monitor was placed to monitor noise emission from the 2 lots on Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. The data was collected between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. The entire sampling period was 480 minutes. Noise emissions were continuously monitored with Lavg and Lmax calculated over one minute sampling periods. Monitoring was performed using the Quest Q500 noise dosimeter. The instrument was check calibrated before and after each daily survey using the Quest Q-10/QC-20 calibrator. The manufacturer, Quest Technologies, calibrated the noise dosimeter and the check calibrator on August 19, 2002 (See Appendix A). The microphone was placed on a tripod stand for sound collection. 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com 2 For location of surveys, please see Appendix B. Location Description of Areas Sampled 1 Lot98 2 Between Lot 98 and 99 3 Lot99 4 Lot98 Results: The following table is a summary of the surveys that were conducted. Graphs 1-4 on the following pages present the data as decibels vs. time (10 minutes sampling intervals). Graphs 5-8 are visual aids to assist in the presentation of the data as percent time statistical distribution. For the raw data, please see Appendix C. Sample Sample TWA Max Level Min. Lavg Lmax Lmax Location time (dBA) (dBA) Level >60dBA >60dBA >65 dBA (min) (dBA) (min) per per sample sample (min) (min) 1 480 40.7 69.ldB 46.8dB 1 5 2 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 12:53:35 1:24:38 AM AM 2 480 42.0 66.4dB 48.6dB 0 11 2 10/22/2002 10/23/2002 11:23:34 1:07:48 PM AM 3 480 51.3 58.ldB 50.3dB 0 0 0 10/24/2002 10/23/2002 12:31:29 11:17:57 AM PM 4 480 36.4 68.4dB 42.ldB 0 3 1 10/24/2002 10/25/2002 10:41:23 5:08:43 PM AM 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com 3 Graph 1: Location 1 Location 1 (Lot 98) with 1 Sample per Division l 70dB 67dBt-----------------------------------------------------I 64dB t-------"---------------------~ ....... -------------,,......,-..------------! l ! I ::: r--_.,.-.;;;;:::;:;;:;;a---,:=::::::::;;;;;;;;;;;~::::~,-=--=:__::..:::.;;.=::::;;r----'"""'-~~_...,.-,,:;.-:;r-~\-----:-----;:;:;:;;:7;:;::;=:;-j I 49dB t------------------------'lr--'-------,_...-,::_;__,._ _ __,,,_ ___ ,+------------;,; i 46dB +-----------~-'----------+-------------,-""-----'----'.,.__--+--+-----+---· 40d8 +-----------------""'--1,-,---+---------------'----'---+---,f-----' ,, 28dB +--------------------------------------------------------- 25d!l· -·~·-· 2 . 3 4 5-6 7 B 9 . 10· 11 • 12 1:l 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Logged between-10/2112002 10:00:09 PM and 10/22/2002 6:00:09 AM at 0:01 :00 Intervals :• L;AVG#I II] LMAX#I· • Speelal Graph 2: _______ .. _______ .. 27 28 29 30 ;;'! l Location 2 (Between Lot 98 and 99) with 1 Sample per Division 70dB ,-------------------------------'----------'---------------------, ~dB+--'---------------------------------------------- 66dBt------------------------------------------------------ 6~dB +--------------------------------------'---------~ 62dB +---------------------'------------------------------- ~dB !I 58d8 :! I ~' ~ l 54dB \ A. .-1' / \. .....,. ~ 52dBt~V'~~~'\~~/~::"\.~/==::;~-........-::::"'~~~~~:::,/=\:s;;2~::/:===~\~~/=\.==/:=j 50d6 ...._ __,~ '-,;r \...._/ ........,..... 48d6 +---------------------"....>,-------------~-------------,, :1 46d6 +----'---,--------~-------,.-~-.....::l------------~.,,..._,,,-...~.:::,,,..,......--,::.,,...,.="<-----,f-- 44dB +------'-,--......,....------------'---"...,._---fr-,...,-"',,-----'--r-/-~----~--+ ',· -,+/,........, 42dB +-------------------------,----'\-"<'-_/~. _\ __ +-1-------,-----t--- 4ddB -t-------------------------"V-~ __ \.~...,_/ ___________ V _ ___, 38dB ·" ,, i ~ I 34d8 ,· l 32dB +-----------------------'---'----------------------------.,.---- 30d8 1 2 3 4 10 . 11 12 · 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Logged between 10/22/200210:00:09 PM end 10/23/2002 6:00:0S·AM at 0:01 :00 Intervals Ill LMAX #I • Speelal 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com 4 Graph 3: 70dB Location 3 (Lot 99)-wlth 1 Sample per Division 68dB 66dB 64dfl, 62dB 60dB 58dB 56dB 54dB 52dB· -50dl3 48d8 46d8 44d8 42dB 40dB 2 • LAVG#I Iii! LMAX #I • Special Graph 4: Location 4 (Lot 98) wi'th 1 Sample.per Division 70dB.,..---------------,--------------------,-,-------------,-----~ 67dB +--------'---------'------'-'---------,-----------------------;i 64dB +---------------------~--------------------------------' 61dB+---------------------------------'------------------------' 56dB +-.---------,------------------------------.,..----------- 55dB tt~:::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~====;~~=~===~~==~~:;;~==;~~~~::;;;~~~~=~~~~~=~~~~~;~§~~~~~~;;~;--f, : ::j 46dB :: 1 43dB -----------'-----------------------------,,<\-----+-------------- 40d8 -.-------------------'---------+-------------------------------' 37dB +-----------------'------------1-------+-->.--J.--------~--'-'------' -:34d8 +--------------------------+---------f--'--------'--------------, 31d8 +-------------'-------------------------+------------'---------' 28d8 +--------------------------¼---F=t--+--'-----------------~- 2Sd8 +---------'-------------------------'---+--f---+---f------------------- 22d8t-,--------~---------------------+--,-'--+-t-------------------- 19d8+----'----------------------------l--+--I--'+----------'-'-------------' 16dB+-----------------'-----------'-------l,.../---l,--1---~----'-------------- 13d8 +------------'------'---------------*""----------------------- 10d8 1··---2. -3 4 -5 ti' ;B LAVG#I 1600 Faraday Avenue 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 -23 24 25 Logged between 10/24/200210:00:09 PM and-10/25/2002 6:00,09 AM Ill 0:01:00 Intervals Ill LMAX#I B Special Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 26 27 28 29 30 31-:· j .. 1 www.invitrogen.com 5 Graph 5: Location 1 Percent Time Statistical Distribution 1oor..----------------------------------------------------,- 90% 80% 70% 60% i { I' ', 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% -~Qi:?'TT"1""T'"TTT"T''T'"T'"T'TTTT-'TT"'T"'T'"1'.'T"T'°TT"T'~'TTTTT'"T"'"T'T"T'T'T"TT"T'-,"'T_.,..-TT'T-'TT"T'T"T""T'-'T-T'T"T''TT"T'"T''T'TT'T'T"T'T"T-"T-"T'"T"T"-r:."T'TTT'T~ 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Tick marks in dB . ~ Dosimeter #1 !Graph 6: Location 2 % ---------------------------------------------------. Percent Time Statistical Distribution 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 10% I.. : 0% ~--.."T-=T"-':"i"'.!T'-'T,.'T-"T'--~~_Qi:;i.si~v-o-"'T!'-, . "T'"T'-"T'-T-"T'"T'"T-,-, -, .,._.,yr·-·· ,-'T,-·· y_, "T ,~T'T.:r.,~-r~, . ,. -:: ...... .,~, -r ,-.er-,-, , -,-Y-':T"""T'-,-•o-"'1' T-i'T~,~-r~-r.:r-,--,...,, -. Y.-,--r~T--,-·-r.,~·r-.,~TT-,-40 so 50 10 eo so 100 110 120 130 Tick marks in dB · El Ooslmoler #1 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com 6 Graph 7: Location 3 Percent Time-Statistical Distribution j' ,100%------------------------------------------------------,,, , 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40')(, 30% 20% 10% m 0% ,,..,..,..,..,..,..,..,.,,...,! 40 50 Iii ,: _Q,EjJ'T'T'T"'TT"T"T'~"T.,.,_'T'j"TTT"T':'.'i"T"T'TTTT"1''"T'T"'TT"TT'T"T'T"T'T9r'T'T.'T~t"-'TTTT-"T'.:T;T-r"'T'TT'T'T"T"T'T-'T:T'T·"T''T'·TT-"TT--r'!'T"'T'TT'T",T'T-r"T-"T'-"TT-'T-60 70 60 90 100 110 120 130 Tick marks in dB l!I Dosimeter #1 rGraph 8: Location 4 ----~ -----------··· _ ______________ _ · Percent Time Statistlca/Dlstrlbutlon 00% . 90% i I 80% !, l 70% I-i 50% 1- 1 30% I 20% I 10% I 0% .,..,. 40 50 . ' o"f"'TT'T'-r'T'T:TT'T'TT-"T'T'TT'T"'T"TT"TT"r,T'T''T~TT'T'T'TTT'T'T'~'T-T"T''T'T"TT"T'"T'"TT'TT'T'T'T""T'TT"T'"T''"TT"T-r"T""T'T'T'~'TT'"T'T"T,.T'T-T'T'TT-T'T.,;I, 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Tick marks in dB : I!!] Doslmoler #1 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com 7 Discussion: The survey results demonstrate that equipment located at Lots 98 and 99 do not emit noises that surpass the standard set forth by the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan. Using the Laverage (average noise over 1 minute) to determine noise compliance, the surveys recorded only 1 minute per 32 hours of noise sampling that exceeded 60 d.BA (64.7 d.BA). The sample occurred on October 22 at 12:53 a.m. Therefore, lots 98 and 99 are in conformance with the required noise standard. When evaluating look at the Lmaximum (maximum noise recorded over 1 minute) the following data was compiled: The survey at Location 1 indicated 5 minutes of noise emissions above 60 d.BA over 8 hours and 2 minutes of noise emissions above 65 d.BA over the same period. The survey at Location 2 indicated 11 minutes of noise emissions above 60 d.BA over 8 hours and 2 minutes of noise emissions above 65 d.BA over the same period. The survey at Location 3 indicated O minutes of noise emissions above 60 d.BA over 8 hours and O minutes of noise emissions above 65 d.BA over the same period. The survey at Location 4 indicated 3 minutes of noise emissions above 60 d.BA over 8 hours and 1 minute of noise emissions above 65 d.BA over the same period. The data compiled was calculated over 8 hours of sampling time. The conclusion remains the same that lots 98 and 99 are in conformance with the required noise standard. 1600 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760 603 7200 F: 760 603 7201 www.invitrogen.com Submitted By: Serial No: Model: SubAssemblies: Description Test Conditions: INVITROGEN INC. 1600FAIRDAY AVE CARLOSBAD,CA us QO0080037 QC-20 Date Received: Date Issued: Valid Until Serial Number Model Conditions: 14-Aug-2002 19-Aug-2002 19-Aug-2003 Page 1 of 1 Temperature: Humidity: 18°C to 25°C 20%to 80% As Received: Final Condition: Fully Functional and In Tolerance Fully Functional and In Tolerance Barometric Pressure: Calibrated per Procedure: Reference Standard Device Fluke45 B&K Ensemble Measurement Uncertainty: 890 mbar to 1050 mbar 56V982 Serial Number ET000237 ET0000366 Last Calibration 28-Mar-2001 3-Aug-2002 Date Calibration Due 28-Mar-2003 3-Aug-2003 +/-2.5% Acoustic (0.2dB), +/-1.5% AC Voltage,+/-0.001% Frequency "'· Estimated at 95% Confidence Level (k=2) (\ . Calibrated By: 1-d .. af ,.1,0/)'l,?J 19-Aug-2002 Paul M. Wegmann ice Technician This report certifies that all calibration equipment used in the test is tracea le to the NIST, and applies only to the unit identified under equipment above. This report must not be reproduced except in its entirety without the written approval of Quest Technologies. 098-393 Rev. A QUEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1060 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE • OCONOMOWOC, WISCONSIN 53066-4828 800-245-0779 • 262-567-9157 • FAX 262-567-4047 • INTERNET ADDRESS, www.quesl-technologies.com Submitted By: Serial No: Model: SubAssemblies: Description r Certificate of Calibration Certificate No: 1011689-QKA050004 INVITROGEN INC. 1600FAIRDAY AVE CARLOSBAD , CA us QKA050004 Q-500 Date Received: Date Issued: Valid Until QSOO Shoulder Microphone Cable Assembly Serial Number 2129160 Test Conditions: Model Conditions: 14-Aug-2002 19-Aug-2002 19-Aug-2003 Page 1 of 1 Temperature: 18°C to 25°C As Received: Fully Functional and In Tolerance Humidity: Barometric Pressure: Calibrated per Procedure: Reference Standard Device B&K Ensemble Measurement Uncertainty: +/-2.5% Acoustic (0.2dB) 20%to 80% 890 mbar to 1050 mbar 56V846 Serial Number ET0000366 Estimated at 95% Confidence Level (k=2) (\ Final Condition: Fully Functional and In Tolerance Last Calibration Date Calibration Due 3-Aug-2002 3-Aug-2003 Calibrated By: -fJ.J..i.,f_ 19-Aug-2002 PaulM. Wegmann This report certifies that all calibration equipment used in the test is traceable to the NIST, and applies only to the unit identified under equipment above. This report must not be reproduced except in its entirety without the written approval of Quest Technologies. 098-393 Rev. A QUEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1060 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE• OCONO/vlOWOC, WISCONSIN 53066-4828 800-245-0179 • 262-567-9157 • FAX 262-567-4047 • INTERNET ADDRESS: www.quest-technofogies.com Lot 98 Noise Monitoring Figure 1 ~~ ~.::::-._· ·_· ~--~-::: .. L:. .. ___ : __ .....:.:.._· ~_:--~.:. .. _: __ .r--------~ .:::::::. ===============::::::::=::::i --------··----------~~---------· --- t-·-·-, -:-~--1-----. -itt ; -; ' ' j-i ' ' ·:;-1ir-1· :~--:----l: -f' __ J r----' -· ,.!l!!!.1!!1!!!&11!!!!1 ..... !!l!!!! .... l!Q_!!!!!l!! __ !!!!!l!! __ l!!!!!I ... Ills! ~1) ,, . i r , . t l I i f\11 t: i c £-· --· -... , _,,. , j -' I ' ! ' t , ' . ----·-· 1-------.. .. --__ , - ,.. I: ;, .. ,, 11 '. 11 ii ""'·· '-lif i _J,__ • ;-1 -:·-----'1 . t .-: )__ > ; ' . I i .••. < l :1 : ·--, . .-.a 'S ' __ .,.. " Noise k81&~-JIJI_ ~~•·.J"-'1,.,,, ~ -· -~t-~ r;; ... ~··-~ -c ' · ., · Zt!t!rMonitor ~·:; . \ \ Location! -Sample Point Perspective Lot 98 Noise Monitoring ® UJ ~ Location 1 Ground Perspective Figure 2 Noise Monitor Between Lot 98 and Lot 99 Noise Monitoring -:i . ' ~ ) ... ~ '.' -q ,. -k • , __ ....,._ ·-----e"-1 '..t. ..i...1!-..i. M: ~-.... ~~-.,.._ "'-t""'t;-· \",,:,_:-:-··· ·~~ ... ~~,~QA~-,:~~ ..... '• .. 1 ,:,~:~~ ,,-,.~. •. ; ~;:-~ . ~ <'.!\'" 'ii "' *' ·.; .. ? ·: ~ ·r~,.,.·-~-:f -- ·~,;,;- ' ' I ,;/" ""' -.. ...,, ~---= ),\('~ h;-~~ ,:-·-,. -,¼ ··~, ,)l Location 2 -Sample Point Perspective Figure 3 Noise Monitor Between Lot 98 and 99 Noise Monitoring Figure 4 Monitor Location 2 -Ground Perspective Lot 99 Noise Monitoring ·!. r~ -~- Location 3 -Sample Point Perspective Figure 5 Noise Monitor Lot 99 Noise Monitoring ;,-.... -.---~ -;;_,-«·~-"T,._ ... _,......,,;,;.;w., '1 Location 3 Ground Perspective Figure 6 -, I i :) ! Noise Monitor Lot 98 Noise Monitoring " :I l ,1, 'O ")""1 ,lj;. £1 ·~'1·-,. , ··· :r_i 11nj,i .. , 'T .. , l. -·'." -. . .. -. -·. .. . ' --• · .• )~ 7 . . l-.. -. Cl . -' '. ~~·~.-i~---.. •t r:"'a' \ ! ' j. '<·d ,{ ~ ; ' •·"""' _,.,.,_a 't b • ~-,•i .,,..,..._ ..... , \ · ' ~., i-Ji\'I · • -'17 · i · tfl~\.i( •<'½· . i \;·,ft\ I • • ,/. ,:~;£ : ' \I! •I ,/!,'V,tf ; j•' ,)~ ...........,,,~, " t'<,r, 1 'f,J~ JJJ ,;;,;;=.:-.,.-r' '-"" -'•' · ,:; • h , L":"'"-l ~ . ..z~, ,:, ,, , ,. ,:;,,.,,,..,,,.==•"•-=::::· "'Fl'' b, •. ,.,.,._.,.v•-~.. : ,_; __ ,;;_: I --,..;" ~--., .-~ '( ,. -r-·~~ ~-e,_ / l;: 3/ • < r-"'t ___ ,, ' ;., · 1,·:o} ,,' i=-tty 7/ jr,:.,· ',, -::>: 1 •.-.-·, •• ,,,, _ _ . .. -i9"'; ..,, ;.-.JL......,_ ::-,:, i. ~~ .'J. -,.. ., ) r 1·':'..;a _. _ _. , "· . :_:.;u,,{1~ '"'··~-Jr-··-, ... : ~~1~it. ~ ~ ,_.Jt rr;r, -·a,i: ,_,.,,,.__......,...:.:rf:',:. ' ~ "'_1 ... ::.>,ip;,.' <'' -.......... -:' 1,..1' :i~, -:, ~ , t \-.,, ,~. ~ .. ,.. -: "'.; ,,.,,._ . ..:4"•'~~;:;,,;,v.;_,~,·j~ t.-. -,., ' , '. -~,," ': f~7£>, -:.,. , ..... ..,,,,~ :. -··· -•• ; ,._ ·· lb---... ; ;-_,;;, '/. -"U;"· . :!,J!l' Af~1."F-· ;_,,-.,.j; , t;~.,,: d -..· .., "( ~~-:-e,·"'· . .;' ··".,. . . . • , I .· _,' ;_~,;,,,:lr~ .,~¾:~-Vv·~..\1'.9:'4 .. ':, .-·q ·. .. -~ ~"" . :· . . . . .. , ,,, . ; ', ''--';,. . .. ' .. ' . ;: ,,;,,, -~i,,. ::. ;,- . , ~ :'"~ , ... ,._' i-~} • ·,/ ~-•,. "·. ,. .. , ~ .. il ,,'.~.!~~ . -: ~·:' .... _ ,•, . .. -~(,;_ \' '~ t·~t' / -~.. '" r . •, .. ?i\,, r l .. (';I: •, r,-., ,"it; .••. ;' . ··'(''· "' . ~\:·/;·, ~.: ,; )>.,. f ·.1 '<;, . .> 1,. ··: ~·. ~~.:;: .1~ ri ·:.~-/;:;<~~:< J /,~ , ' , ,,· '(..: ,.;~,( .'' ,~~_/1 ,,,;.._,., • ,, '• ·~.-:;.. !,,.._,-:,:.~~ .. f.;{.f,;~, ._,,..,; !::.:",,:,. .. ·~·, • ~1t1i ~, '. ';. fr!-J>,' ,; ~ ',;: ~~j~ '~ ; ";, ,• r ,;'" ~ ( ~ ... "s,i~ ~.,,., -: .. ,~,,t'•r"~f ,_.',1.-,"'-,.'-,-ll" -.;,," ·:,"-' 4.,', .., ; ,\1 ,1, ~~-~~i!S-,1,t ,~ t,~· ,~"'-~,J .. /!',;:-"",: -,,~.·-(iJ1.1'i . · ·, ;,/'/\ 4llfiJ'.·1·r; ,l ' .. /?/ft ti~,--,; 1/\: · -~ ;r-li· -:~>,.:,·'j· ,~ ,:f ,:,, i' -. -~,,-: ,,,._11,':;~ ~r:;_ .. ~.1~\-,1 / ,,#· .. t .... ,..~1. ,;,~ ;) • {!:,if :r~. l: ~ ~-.,~. '} ,r; ~-l;' ~~Jr ' µ7" ~-... ~',·: ,,,\\}.:(,.;#, ',I~~ '~.1 , i,~ .. ;-.,(t<, , ",.:1~ tt~,• ),1'1:f > ~ ,, '\· ··.?, .. _:,·.-.~. ' <';,ij· /1,;::-, •. , :"_ ' ,.;i~?"if'~l .,,,,. ~ , t: ~-~_}!!·_ ~.1:f~.. 4 /"'J!_"__ -~ ~~/ r.\1.,· --~-~~ ~,_,,~-w-1 Location 4 Sample Point Perspective Figure 7 Noise Monitor \ Location 1 (Lot 98): Raw Data Lavg Lmax 10:46:09 PM 51.5 53.4 11:34:09 PM 39.7 51.8 Time (dBA) (dBA) 10:47:09 PM 52.2 55 11:35:09 PM 0 49.8 10:00:09 PM 52.9 59 10:48:09 PM 51 51.7 11:36:09 PM 27 51.3 10:01:09 PM 53.3 59.8 10:49:09 PM 51.3 54.9 11:37:09 PM 44.8 53.1 10:02:09 PM 50.8 51.2 10:50:09 PM 52.1 54.1 11:38:09 PM 0 49.6 10:03:09 PM 51.3 54 10:51:09 PM 52.3 54.6 11:39:09 PM 0 49.6 10:04:09 PM 52.1 54.4 10:52:09 PM 42.2 52 11:40:09 PM 0 49.7 10:05:09 PM 51.6 54.4 10:53:09 PM 6.3 50 11 :41 :09 PM 0 49.3 10:06:09 PM 50.7 51.5 10:54:09 PM 33.2 50.1 11:42:09 PM 44.4 50.7 10:07:09 PM 50.9 51.5 10:55:09 PM 43.1 52.2 11:43:09 PM 0 49.7 10:08:09 PM 50.4 50.9 10:56:09 PM 37.8 52.4 11:44:09 PM 0 49.5 10:09:09 PM 50.3 50.8 10:57:09 PM 45.1 51.2 11:45:09 PM 0 49.6 10:10:09 PM 51.3 52.7 10:58:09 PM 29.1 50.9 11:46:09 PM 0 49.4 10:11:09 PM 48.8 50.8 10:59:09 PM 26.8 50.2 11:47:09 PM 0 49.4 10:12:09 PM 22.3 50 11:00:09 PM 36.7 50.9 11:48:09 PM 38.1 52.5 10:13:09 PM 28.5 50.1 11:01:09 PM 38.4 51.2 11:49:09 PM 38.9 51.5 10:14:09 PM 46.9 51.4 11:02:09 PM 46.4 54.2 11:50:09 PM 0 49.4 10:15:09 PM 43.9 50.5 11:03:09 PM 48.1 52.5 11:51:09 PM 32 50.7 10:16:09 PM 49.5 53.9 11:04:09 PM 0 49.9 11:52:09 PM 0 49.4 10:17:09 PM 48.2 50.7 11:05:09 PM 47.5 54.1 11:53:09 PM 0 49.5 10:18:09 PM 52 57.5 11:06:09 PM 9.5 50 11:54:09 PM 0 49.8 10:19:09 PM 44.7 50.6 11:07:09 PM 38.5 51.1 11:55:09 PM 24.4 50.2 10:20:09 PM 48.6 52.7 11:08:09 PM 45.1 53.2 11:56:09 PM 0 49.8 10:21:09 PM 52.1 54.8 11:09:09 PM 41.6 51.7 11:57:09 PM 0 49.4 10:22:09 PM 55.2 65.1 11:10:09 PM 44.9 53.1 11:58:09 PM 38.8 50.9 10:23:09 PM 50.3 63.7 11 :11:09 PM 0 49.9 11:59:09 PM 23.5 50.2 10:24:09 PM 38.9 50.6' 11 :12:09 PM 37.7 50.7 12:00:09 AM 0 49.8 10:25:09 PM 47.7 58.1 11:13:09 PM 0 49.5 12:01:09 AM 39.9 53 10:26:09 PM 46.9 57 11:14:09 PM 0 49.5 12:02:09 AM 45.4 52.4 10:27:09 PM 29.2 50.1 11:15:09PM 0 49.6 12:03:09 AM 41.8 52.2 10:28:09 PM 41.4 51.9 11:16:09PM 39.9 50.3 12:04:09 AM 50.6 55.3 10:29:09 PM 46.5 51.3 11:17:09 PM 45.4 53.4 12:05:09 AM 53.2 57.9 10:30:09 PM 48.7 51.4 11:18:09 PM 47.2 57.3 12:06:09 AM 35.9 51.9 10:31:09 PM 49.7 57.3 11:19:09 PM 48.1 54.2 12:07:09 AM 17.8 50.1 10:32:09 PM 52.2 55.4 11:20:09 PM 0 49.9 12:08:09 AM 36.5 51.2 10:33:09 PM 51.2 52.3 11:21:09PM 31.8 50.3 12:09:09 AM 34.8 50.5 10:34:09 PM 51.2 51.8 11:22:09 PM 42.9 51.5 12:10:09 AM 42.2 51.7 10:35:09 PM 51.5 53.4 11:23:09 PM 0 49.9 12:11:09 AM 0 49 10:36:09 PM 51.1 52.1 11:24:09 PM 32.8 50.3 12:12:09 AM 0 49.3 10:37:09 PM 51 51.4 11:25:09 PM 43.2 51.5 12:13:09 AM 0 49 10:38:09 PM 51.2 51.7 11:26:09 PM 42.9 53.3 12:14:09 AM 39.6 51.2 10:39:09 PM 51.3 53.6 11:27:09 PM 0 49.6 12:15:09 AM 0 49.2 10:40:09 PM 51.3 52.3 11:28:09 PM 0 49.7 12:16:09 AM 0 49 10:41:09 PM 51.2 52.1 11:29:09 PM 0 49.5 12:17:09 AM 0 49 10:42:09 PM 50.8 51.4 11:30:09 PM 0 49.6 12:18:09 AM 0 48.8 10:43:09 PM 51.1 51.4 11:31:09 PM 0 49.8 12:19:09 AM 0 48.2 10:44:09 PM 52.5 58.2 11:32:09 PM 40.3 51.9 12:20:09 AM 0 48.3 10:45:09 PM 54.6 58.5 11:33:09 PM 0 49.6 12:21 :09 AM 0 48.2 Location 1 (Lot 98): Raw Data 12:22:09 AM 30.8 52 1:10:09 AM 0 48 1:58:09 AM 0 48.8 12:23:09 AM 34.9 51.8 1:11:09 AM 0 48 1:59:09 AM 0 49.6 12:24:09 AM 0 47.8 1:12:09 AM 0 47.8 2:00:09 AM 0 48.6 12:25:09 AM 0 48 1:13:09 AM 0 48 2:01:09 AM 22.1 50.2 12:26:09 AM 0 48 1:14:09 AM 0 48.1 2:02:09 AM 0 49.9 12:27:09 AM 0 48.1 1:15:09 AM 0 47.8 2:03:09 AM 37.3 50.8 12:28:09 AM 0 48.1 1:16:09AM 0 47.9 2:04:09AM 0 49.3 12:29:09 AM 0 48 1:17:09 AM 0 47.7 2:05:09 AM 0 49 12:30:09 AM 0 49.9 1:18:09 AM 0 47.6 2:06:09 AM 0 49.2 12:31:09 AM 16.1 50.4 1:19:09 AM 0 47.9 2:07:09 AM 0 49.3 12:32:09 AM 39.4 53.5 1:20:09 AM 0 48.1 2:08:09 AM 0 49.1 12:33:09 AM 42.6 53 1 :21 :09 AM 0 48.1 2:09:09 AM 0 49.1 12:34:09 AM 0 48.7 1:22:09 AM 0 48 2:10:09 AM 0 49.1 12:35:09 AM 14 50 1:23:09 AM 0 47.9 2:11:09 AM 0 49.7 12:36:09 AM 34.8 52.1 1:24:09 AM 0 47.9 2:12:09 AM 44.9 58 12:37:09 AM 21.3 50.4 1:25:09 AM 0 47.9 2:13:09 AM 34.8 51.3 12:38:09 AM 51.2 55.6 1:26:09 AM 0 48.1 2:14:09 AM 0 48.8 12:39:09 AM 0 49.9 1:27:09 AM 0 47.8 2:15:09 AM 0 48.4 12:40:09 AM 37 58.2 1:28:09 AM 0 48.1 2:16:09 AM 0 48.7 12:41:09 AM 41.8 58.3 1:29:09 AM 0 48.2 2:17:09 AM 0 48.6 12:42:09 AM 0 48 1:30:09 AM 38.5 51.6 2:18:09 AM 0 48.7 12:43:09 AM 0 48.3 1:31:09 AM 0 49.5 2:19:09 AM 0 48.5 12:44:09 AM 0 48.1 1:32:09 AM 0 48.1 2:20:09 AM 0 48.4 12:45:09 AM 0 48.8 1:33:09 AM 0 48.1 2:21:09 AM 0 48.5 12:46:09 AM 0 49.3 1:34:09 AM 0 48.1 2:22:09 AM 0 48 12:47:09 AM 41.4 51 1:35:09 AM 0 47.9 2:23:09 AM 0 48.1 12:48:09 AM 0 49.9 1:36:09 AM 0 48.1 2:24:09AM 0 48.2 12:49:09 AM 37.6 51.4 1:37:09 AM 0 47.9 2:25:09AM 0 48.2 12:50:09 AM 32.2 50.9 1:38:09 AM 0 48 2:26:09 AM 0 48.2 12:51:09 AM 0 49 1:39:09 AM 29.3 51.5 2:27:09 AM 0 48.3 12:52:09 AM 51.5 63.5 1:40:09 AM 0 47.9 2:28:09 AM 0 48.3 12:53:09 AM 64.7 69.1 1:41:09 AM 0 48 2:29:09 AM 0 48.5 12:54:09 AM 51.3 59.9 1:42:09 AM 0 48.1 2:30:09 AM 0 48.4 12:55:09 AM 0 49 1:43:09 AM 0 47.9 2:31:09 AM 0 48.1 12:56:09 AM 0 48.7 1:44:09 AM 0 47.8 2:32:09 AM 46 56.3 12:57:09 AM 25.4 50.6 1:45:09 AM 0 48 2:33:09 AM 0 48.1 12:58:09 AM 27.6 51 1:46:09 AM 23.6 50.2 2:34:09AM 0 49.5 12:59:09 AM 0 48.6 1:47:09 AM 46.2 54.7 2:35:09 AM 0 48.2 1:00:09 AM 0 48.8 1:48:09 AM 36 54.1 2:36:09 AM 0 48.2 1:01:09 AM 0 48.4 1:49:09 AM 0 48.5 2:37:09 AM 0 48.3 1:02:09 AM 0 48.2 1:50:09 AM 0 48.2 2:38:09 AM 0 48.3 1:03:09 AM 0 48.2 1:51:09 AM 0 49.5 2:39:09 AM 0 48.2 1:04:09 AM 0 48.1 1:52:09 AM 35.2 52 2:40:09 AM 0 48.2 1:05:09 AM 0 48.2 1:53:09 AM 41.1 53.5 2:41:09 AM 0 47.9 1:06:09 AM 0 48.4 1:54:09 AM 0 48.2 2:42:09AM 0 48 1:07:09 AM 0 48.1 1:55:09 AM 24.1 50.7 2:43:09 AM 0 48.1 1:08:09 AM 0 48.1 1:56:09 AM 28.2 50.7 2:44:09 AM 19.6 50 1:09:09 AM 0 47.9 1:57:09 AM 0 48.5 2:45:09 AM 0 48.1 Location 1 (Lot 98): Raw Data 2:46:09 AM 0 48.3 3:34:09 AM 0 48.5 4:22:09 AM 0 49.7 2:47:09AM 0 48.3 3:35:09 AM 23.4 52.2 4:23:09 AM 0 49.1 2:48:09 AM 0 49.6 3:36:09 AM 47.9 54.2 4:24:09AM 0 48.7 2:49:09AM 0 48.2 3:37:09 AM 37.5 51.4 4:25:09 AM 0 48.6 2:50:09 AM 27.8 50.5 3:38:09 AM 0 48.2 4:26:09 AM 28.7 50.8 2:51:09 AM 35.6 50.9 3:39:09 AM 0 48.3 4:27:09 AM 43.1 53.2 2:52:09 AM 0 49.8 3:40:09AM 0 48.3 4:28:09 AM 46.6 55.5 2:53:09 AM 0 48.2 3:41:09 AM 0 48.3 4:29:09 AM 0 48.9 2:54:09AM 0 47.9 3:42:09 AM 28.6 50.4 4:30:09 AM 0 49.2 2:55:09AM 0 48.3 3:43:09 AM 41.7 53.1 4:31:09 AM 40.2 51.2 2:56:09 AM 0 49.4 3:44:09 AM 0 49.1 4:32:09 AM 0 49.6 2:57:09 AM 25.5 51.1 3:45:09AM 0 49.8 4:33:09 AM 35.1 51.7 2:58:09AM 0 47.9 3:46:09AM 37 52.6 4:34:09AM 42.1 52.4 2:59:09 AM 0 48 3:47:09 AM 33.4 52.3 4:35:09AM 32 51.3 3:00:09 AM 0 48.4 3:48:09AM 0 48.2 4:36:09AM 32.2 51.3 3:01:09 AM 0 48.2 3:49:09 AM 41.6 52.2 4:37:09AM 31.6 50.6 3:02:09 AM 0 48.1 3:50:09 AM 0 48.4 4:38:09AM 39.7 51.4 3:03:09 AM 0 48.3 3:51:09 AM 0 48.5 4:39:09 AM 41.5 53.8 3:04:09 AM 0 48.4 3:52:09 AM 0 48.5 4:40:09AM 46 53.7 3:05:09 AM 0 48.4 3:53:09 AM 46.2 55.9 4:41:09 AM 38 51.1 3:06:09 AM 0 48.8 3:54:09 AM 23.2 50.4 4:42:09AM 41.1 53.4 3:07:09 AM 0 48.5 3:55:09 AM 19.9 50.2 4:43:09AM 0 49.5 3:08:09 AM 0 48.3 3:56:09 AM 24.2 50.3 4:44:09AM 21.8 50.3 3:09:09 AM 0 48.4 3:57:09 AM 26.7 50.8 4:45:09AM 37.1 52 3:10:09 AM 0 48.5 3:58:09 AM 0 48.3 4:46:09 AM 36.7 52.1 3:11:09 AM 0 48.6 3:59:09 AM 0 48.3 4:47:09 AM 47.3 55.5 3:12:09 AM 0 48.5 4:00:09 AM 0 48.4 4:48:09 AM 48.5 55 3:13:09 AM 0 48.7 4:01:09 AM 0 49.8 4:49:09AM 45.9 54.5 3:14:09 AM 0 48.6 4:02:09AM 0 49 4:50:09 AM 0 49.5 3:15:09 AM 0 48.5 4:03:09 AM 28.1 50.6 4:51:09 AM 0 49.4 3:16:09 AM 0 48.5 4:04:09AM 33.2 51.4 4:52:09 AM 0 48.8 3:17:09 AM 0 48.5 4:05:09 AM 0 49.6 4:53:09 AM 0 49.8 3:18:09 AM 37.5 50.6 4:06:09 AM 0 48.5 4:54:09 AM 39.2 52.9 3:19:09 AM 0 48.7 4:07:09AM 0 48.5 4:55:09 AM 44.8 53.3 3:20:09AM 0 49.9 4:08:09 AM 0 48.5 4:56:09 AM 47.5 54.4 3:21:09 AM 0 48.7 4:09:09AM 0 48.6 4:57:09 AM 42.5 53.3 3:22:09 AM 0 48.5 4:10:09 AM 0 48.6 4:58:09 AM 44.8 52.9 3:23:09 AM 0 48.7 4:11 :09 AM 0 48.3 4:59:09 AM 44.2 51.9 3:24:09 AM 42.9 53.3 4:12:09 AM 28.6 50.6 5:00:09 AM 24.7 50.5 3:25:09AM 46.4 53.2 4:13:09 AM 39.3 51.8 5:01:09 AM 42.9 52.5 3:26:09 AM 0 48.5 4:14:09 AM 0 48.2 5:02:09 AM 45.5 53.8 3:27:09 AM 0 49.9 4:15:09 AM 0 48.5 5:03:09 AM 23.6 50.1 3:28:09 AM 46.5 57.5 4:16:09 AM 0 48.4 5:04:09 AM 41.4 51.5 3:29:09 AM 0 48.4 4:17:09 AM 0 48.6 5:05:09 AM 40.9 51.5 3:30:09 AM 0 48.2 4:18:09 AM 0 48.4 5:06:09 AM 0 48.6 3:31:09 AM 0 48.4 4:19:09 AM 0 48.3 5:07:09 AM 0 48.5 3:32:09 AM 44.7 58.5 4:20:09 AM 0 48.1 5:08:09 AM 0 48.4 3:33:09AM 40.3 58.3 4:21:09 AM 0 48.5 5:09:09 AM 30.1 50.2 Location 1 (Lot 98): Raw Data 5:10:09 AM 0 49.7 5:58:09 AM 51 56 5:11:09 AM 0 49.2 5:59:09 AM 45.1 55.3 5:12:09 AM 0 49.1 5:13:09 AM 0 48.1 5:14:09 AM 0 48.1 5:15:09 AM 44.1 53.5 5:16:09 AM 47.3 54.7 5:17:09 AM 45.6 54.4 5:18:09 AM 46.7 53.1 5:19:09 AM 0 49.3 5:20:09 AM 27.9 50.5 5:21:09 AM 39.2 52.6 5:22:09 AM 23.9 50.2 5:23:09 AM 29.3 52.6 5:24:09AM 43.5 54.5 5:25:09 AM 45 54 5:26:09AM 42.9 51.7 5:27:09 AM 48 54.2 5:28:09 AM 37.9 54.6 5:29:09 AM 46.3 54.5 5:30:09 AM 42.3 52.5 5:31:09 AM 0 48.5 5:32:09 AM 39.1 52.2 5:33:09 AM 30.2 51.2 5:34:09 AM 31.4 50.8 5:35:09 AM 44.9 51.7 5:36:09 AM 37.6 52.6 5:37:09 AM 42.3 53 5:38:09 AM 45.4 53.4 5:39:09 AM 34.6 52.6 5:40:09 AM 40.6 52.7 5:41:09 AM 50.6 54.7 5:42:09AM 50.4 54.9 5:43:09AM 48.8 55.2 5:44:09AM 50.2 56.1 5:45:09 AM 52.5 55.6 5:46:09AM 53.8 55.6 5:47:09 AM 48.8 54.2 5:48:09 AM 50.9 54.5 5:49:09AM 53.3 59.2 5:50:09 AM 57 62.2 5:51:09 AM 51.1 55.6 5:52:09 AM 52.7 56.7 5:53:09 AM 49.4 53.1 5:54:09 AM 52.4 56.1 5:55:09 AM 47.5 56 5:56:09 AM 42.7 52.5 5:57:09 AM 45.4 53.6 Location 2 (Between Lot 98 and 99): Raw Data Lavg Lmax 10:46:09 PM 22.7 50 11:34:09 PM 53 58.3 Time (dBA) (dBA) 10:47:09 PM 37.7 50.2 11:35:09 PM 47 54.4 10:00:09 PM 50.6 57.4 10:48:09 PM 28.2 50.1 11:36:09 PM 47.3 53.9 10:01:09 PM 50.3 50.9 10:49:09 PM 32.5 50.1 11:37:09 PM 40.5 51.4 10:02:09 PM 50.8 55.3 10:50:09 PM 42.9 56 11:38:09 PM 48.8 56.3 10:03:09 PM 50.4 50.8 10:51:09 PM 43.4 55 11:39:09 PM 34.4 50.1 10:04:09 PM 50.4 50.9 10:52:09 PM 47.5 57.7 11:40:09 PM 30.7 50.2 10:05:09 PM 50.4 51.1 10:53:09 PM 42.4 54.3 11:41:09 PM 44.2 54 10:06:09 PM 51.4 56.4 10:54:09 PM 43.9 50.4 11:42:09 PM 42.5 56.6 10:07:09 PM 50.3 50.7 10:55:09 PM 44.3 50.4 11 :43:09 PM 44.3 51 10:08:09 PM 51.3 53.8 10:56:09 PM 42.7 50.3 11:44:09 PM 37.2 51.3 10:09:09 PM 50.8 55.1 10:57:09 PM 36.6 50.5 11:45:09 PM 44.9 54 10:10:09 PM 50.3 52.4 10:58:09 PM 40.1 53.8 11:46:09 PM 36.1 51 10:11:09 PM 50.3 53.6 10:59:09 PM 48.7 54.9 11:47:09 PM 48.6 60.7 10:12:09 PM 50.3 54.8 11:00:09 PM 40.4 50.2 11:48:09 PM 47 55.3 10:13:09 PM 49.7 50.6 11:01:09 PM 49.3 50.7 11:49:09 PM 47.1 54.4 10:14:09 PM 46.7 50.3 11:02:09 PM 48.3 55.9 11:50:09 PM 28.1 50.1 10:15:09 PM 47.1 50.4 11:03:09 PM 49 53.1 11:51:09 PM 47.1 54.3 10:16:09 PM 42.3 53.2 11:04:09 PM 50.2 54.5 11:52:09 PM 46.8 53.8 10:17:09 PM 39.4 50.2 11:05:09 PM 46.1 50.4 11:53:09 PM 30.2 50.1 10:18:09 PM 46.8 56.8 11:06:09 PM 49.3 53.7 11:54:09 PM 50.9 55.8 10:19:09 PM 41.9 50.2 11:07:09 PM 49.3 56 11:55:09 PM 45.5 55.9 10:20:09 PM 37.5 50.2 11:08:09 PM 50.1 54.3 11:56:09 PM 39.6 52 10:21:09 PM 45.5 52.6 11:09:09 PM 39.7 50.2 11:57:09 PM 38.7 50.3 10:22:09 PM 46.2 50.4 11:10:09 PM 43.8 50.5 11:58:09 PM 38.3 52.9 10:23:09 PM 44.9 56 11:11:09 PM 47.8 54.5 11:59:09 PM 34.4 51.7 10:24:09 PM 47.6 58 11:12:09 PM 50.6 56.8 12:00:09 AM 37 55.3 10:25:09 PM 45 50.8 11:13:09 PM 51.6 56.9 12:01:09 AM 39.6 53.4 10:26:09 PM 45.1 50.5 11:14:09 PM 48.8 55.3 12:02:09 AM 11.3 50 10:27:09 PM 46.6 53.4 11:15:09PM 22.9 50 12:03:09 AM 23.2 50 10:28:09 PM 46 55.4 11:16:09 PM 43.1 51.3 12:04:09 AM 0 50 10:29:09 PM 37.9 50.4 11:17:09 PM 42 53.5 12:05:09 AM 0 49.9 10:30:09 PM 49.6 55.5 11:18:09 PM 39.7 56.4 12:06:09 AM 42.5 55.3 10:31:09 PM 49.2 50.6 11:19:09 PM 40.3 52.5 12:07:09 AM 39.8 55.1 10:32:09 PM 48.5 50.6 11:20:09 PM 47.5 54.4 12:08:09 AM 45.1 54.5 10:33:09 PM 49.1 50.7 11:21:09 PM 48.3 54.4 12:09:09 AM 40 53.1 10:34:09 PM 50.7 55.3 11:22:09 PM 51.4 58.2 12:10:09 AM 23.8 50 10:35:09 PM 48.1 50.5 11:23:09 PM 54.7 66.4 12:11:09 AM 19.6 50 10:36:09 PM 46.3 52.6 11:24:09 PM 54.9 63.6 12:12:09 AM 29.6 50.1 10:37:09 PM 50.4 55.7 11:25:09 PM 50.8 55.3 12:13:09 AM 39.8 53.3 10:38:09 PM 43 50.3 11:26:09 PM 51.1 51.7 12:14:09 AM 24.8 50 10:39:09 PM 45.9 53.7 11 :27:09 PM 51.5 53.8 12:15:09 AM 25.8 50 10:40:09 PM 37.9 50.2 11:28:09 PM 51.8 54.4 12:16:09 AM 38 53.9 10:41 :09 PM 39.5 50.2 11:29:09 PM 51.3 55.8 12:17:09 AM 13.4 50 10:42:09 PM 41.2 50.9 11:30:09 PM 51 54.8 12:18:09 AM 0 49.9 10:43:09 PM 47.2 55 11:31:09 PM 50.7 54.4 12:19:09 AM 49.3 60.1 10:44:09 PM 43 54.7 11:32:09 PM 50.8 56.3 12:20:09 AM 0 49.9 10:45:09 PM 21.3 50 11:33:09 PM 51.7 59.1 12:21:09 AM 40.5 59.2 Location 2 (Between Lot 98 and 99): Raw Data 12:22:09 AM 27.5 50.4 1:10:09 AM 0 49.7 1:58:09 AM 0 49.7 12:23:09 AM 0 49.8 1:11:09 AM 0 49.7 1:59:09 AM 33.8 52.2 12:24:09 AM 0 50 1:12:09 AM 21.7 53.1 2:00:09 AM 0 49.5 12:25:09 AM 40 53.2 1:13:09AM 37.2 55 2:01:09 AM 0 49.5 12:26:09 AM 49.8 62.1 1 :14:09 AM 7.1 50 2:02:09AM 0 49.7 12:27:09 AM 46.2 55.3 1:15:09 AM 0 49.7 2:03:09 AM 7.1 50 12:28:09 AM 48.7 54.3 1:16:09 AM 0 49.7 2:04:09 AM 0 49.8 12:29:09AM 24.1 50.2 1:17:09 AM 0 49.9 2:05:09 AM 37 53.4 12:30:09 AM 0 49.9 1:18:09 AM 0 49.8 2:06:09 AM 0 49.8 12:31 :09 AM 40.6 54.5 1:19:09 AM 0 49.8 2:07:09 AM 0 49.8 12:32:09 AM 26.7 50.2 1:20:09 AM 0 49.9 2:08:09 AM 0 49.8 12:33:09 AM 0 49.9 1:21:09 AM 0 49.9 2:09:09 AM 0 49.8 12:34:09 AM 26 50 1:22:09 AM 25.3 50.1 2:10:09 AM 0 49.9 12:35:09 AM 25.6 50.1 1:23:09 AM 31.2 50.7 2:11 :09 AM 0 49.9 12:36:09 AM 36.5 50.2 1:24:09 AM 0 49.8 2:12:09 AM 0 49.8 12:37:09 AM 34.4 50.2 1:25:09 AM 25.1 50 2:13:09 AM 38.4 53.8 12:38:09 AM 41.7 52.8 1:26:09 AM 11.3 50 2:14:09 AM 34.4 52.6 12:39:09 AM 44.7 50.4 1:27:09 AM 0 49.9 2:15:09 AM 0 49.6 12:40:09 AM 47.5 50.3 1:28:09 AM 38.3 52.4 2:16:09 AM 0 49.6 12:41:09 AM 49.3 50.4 1:29:09 AM 0 49.9 2:17:09 AM 0 49.8 12:42:09 AM 50 55 1:30:09 AM 0 49.9 2:18:09 AM 0 49.6 12:43:09 AM 50.2 51.9 1 :31 :09 AM 0 49.9 2:19:09 AM 0 49.7 12:44:09 AM 49.9 54.8 1:32:09 AM 19.4 50 2:20:09 AM 0 49.8 12:45:09 AM 47.8 50.3 1:33:09 AM 26.1 50 2:21:09 AM 0 49.8 12:46:09 AM 47.1 50.2 1:34:09 AM 15.7 50 2:22:09 AM 0 49.8 12:47:09 AM 46.6 50.3 1:35:09 AM 6.3 50 2:23:09 AM 0 49.9 12:48:09 AM 42.1 54.7 1:36:09 AM 0 49.9 2:24:09 AM 0 49.8 12:49:09 AM 32.9 50.2 1:37:09 AM 26.3 50.2 2:25:09 AM 13.1 50 12:50:09 AM 37.5 50.2 1:38:09 AM 0 49.9 2:26:09 AM 0 49.9 12:51:09 AM 45.3 50.3 1:39:09 AM 0 49.8 2:27:09 AM 0 49.8 12:52:09 AM 38 50.1 1:40:09 AM 5.5 50 2:28:09 AM 0 49.9 12:53:09 AM 36.4 50.1 1:41:09 AM 0 49.8 2:29:09 AM 0 49.9 12:54:09 AM 45.2 50.4 1:42:09 AM 41 57.2 2:30:09 AM 0.5 50 12:55:09 AM 33.5 50.1 1:43:09 AM 0 49.5 2:31:09 AM 0 49.9 12:56:09 AM 11.3 50 1:44:09 AM 0 49.7 2:32:09 AM 0 49.8 12:57:09 AM 38.9 54.2 1:45:09 AM 0 49.8 2:33:09 AM 41.8 58 12:58:09 AM 22.1 50 1:46:09 AM 0 49.6 2:34:09 AM 0 49.8 12:59:09 AM 22.3 50 1:47:09 AM 0 49.9 2:35:09 AM 0 49.8 1:00:09 AM 0 49.8 1:48:09 AM 0 49.6 2:36:09 AM 0 49.8 1:01:09 AM 0 49.7 1:49:09 AM 41.3 55 2:37:09 AM 0 50 1:02:09 AM 0 49.6 1:50:09 AM 37.9 54 2:38:09 AM 14 50 1:03:09 AM 0 49.7 1:51:09 AM 0 49.7 2:39:09 AM 0 49.9 1:04:09 AM 0 49.7 1:52:09 AM 0 49.7 2:40:09 AM 0 49.9 1:05:09 AM 12.1 50 1:53:09AM 30.7 53 2:41:09 AM 0 49.8 1:06:09 AM 0 49.6 1:54:09 AM 39.3 53 2:42:09 AM 0 49.8 1:07:09 AM 0 49.8 1:55:09 AM 0 49.5 2:43:09 AM 0 49.8 1:08:09 AM 36.2 53.8 1:56:09 AM 34.6 53 2:44:09 AM 10.9 50 1:09:09 AM 0 49.5 1:57:09 AM 0 49.6 2:45:09 AM 38.2 53.3 Location 2 (Between Lot 98 and 99): Raw Data 2:46:09 AM 0 49.9 3:34:09 AM 0 49.5 4:22:09AM 37.8 50.1 2:47:09 AM 0 49.8 3:35:09 AM 40.4 53.5 4:23:09 AM 47.7 57.2 2:48:09AM 0 49.8 3:36:09 AM 0 49.9 4:24:09 AM 40 53.5 2:49:09AM 0 49.8 3:37:09 AM 21.2 50.1 4:25:09 AM 34.8 52.2 2:50:09 AM 0 49.9 3:38:09 AM 34.6 51.9 4:26:09 AM 38.9 55.2 2:51:09 AM 44.1 53.6 3:39:09 AM 36.3 52.6 4:27:09AM 0 49.8 2:52:09 AM 27.3 51.7 3:40:09 AM 36.8 52.8 4:28:09 AM 20.8 50 2:53:09 AM 0 49.8 3:41:09 AM 22.8 50 4:29:09AM 0 49.9 2:54:09AM 0 49.8 3:42:09AM 15 50 4:30:09 AM 35.8 56 2:55:09 AM 36.3 51.5 3:43:09 AM 6.3 50 4:31:09 AM 37.8 54.9 2:56:09AM 0 49.8 3:44:09AM 39.7 55.6 4:32:09AM 42.6 55.6 2:57:09AM 0 49.8 3:45:09 AM 41.5 55.2 4:33:09 AM 39.8 50.1 2:58:09 AM 35.4 52.7 3:46:09AM 0 49.8 4:34:09AM 40.8 50.2 2:59:09 AM 0 49.9 3:47:09AM 47.4 62.8 4:35:09 AM 38 50.1 3:00:09 AM 0 50 3:48:09AM 0 49.9 4:36:09 AM 34 50.1 3:01:09 AM 0 49.9 3:49:09 AM 0 49.8 4:37:09AM 39.2 55.2 3:02:09AM 0 49.9 3:50:09 AM 39.6 54.5 4:38:09 AM 43.8 55.9 3:03:09 AM 41.4 57.3 3:51:09 AM 30.2 52.3 4:39:09 AM 44.2 58.9 3:04:09 AM 6.3 50 3:52:09 AM 38.5 52.4 4:40:09AM 47.6 57.1 3:05:09 AM 30.3 50.1 3:53:09 AM 18.5 50 4:41:09 AM 46.3 64.2 3:06:09 AM 0 49.9 3:54:09 AM 16.1 50 4:42:09 AM 42.7 53.3 3:07:09 AM 18.8 50 3:55:09 AM 0 49.9 4:43:09 AM 0.5 50 3:08:09 AM 45.6 65.5 3:56:09AM 0 49.8 4:44:09 AM 43.9 54.7 3:09:09 AM 39.3 57.6 3:57:09 AM 0 49.9 4:45:09AM 15 50 3:10:09 AM 33.4 53.3 3:58:09 AM 15.9 50 4:46:09AM 0 49.9 3:11:09 AM 26.6 51.7 3:59:09 AM 14.8 50 4:47:09 AM 36.8 54 3:12:09 AM 0 49.9 4:00:09AM 41.3 54.2 4:48:09 AM 44.1 57 3:13:09 AM 0 49.9 4:01:09 AM 0 49.9 4:49:09AM 47.3 56.5 3:14:09 AM 15 50 4:02:09 AM 31.6 50.1 4:50:09 AM 37.7 54.8 3:15:09 AM 0 49.9 4:03:09 AM 20.4 50.1 4:51:09 AM 39.5 55.6 3:16:09 AM 0 49.9 4:04:09AM 8.4 50 4:52:09 AM 39.1 54.3 3:17:09 AM 17.9 50 4:05:09 AM 0 49.9 4:53:09 AM 48.8 56 3:18:09 AM 30.9 50.1 4:06:09 AM 0 49.9 4:54:09AM 44.5 55.3 3:19:09 AM 30.9 50.1 4:07:09AM 0 49.9 4:55:09 AM 37.6 50.1 3:20:09 AM 9 50 4:08:09 AM 0 49.9 4:56:09 AM 44.9 56.4 3:21:09 AM 38.4 50.1 4:09:09AM 0 49.9 4:57:09 AM 43.8 57.4 3:22:09 AM 43.7 50.2 4:10:09 AM 0 49.9 4:58:09 AM 44.7 55 3:23:09AM 19.1 50.1 4:11:09 AM 39.9 53.9 4:59:09 AM 29.8 50.2 3:24:09AM 36.2 52.5 4:12:09 AM 44.3 50.2 5:00:09 AM 47.6 56 3:25:09 AM 0 49.9 4:13:09 AM 34.2 50.2 5:01:09 AM 34.9 52.8 3:26:09AM 0 49.8 4:14:09 AM 31.6 50.1 5:02:09 AM 0 50 3:27:09 AM 0 49.8 4:15:09 AM 24.1 50 5:03:09 AM 43.1 53.8 3:28:09 AM 23.3 50 4:16:09 AM 38.8 50.2 5:04:09 AM 29.6 50.1 3:29:09 AM 36.1 54.3 4:17:09 AM 36.4 50.1 5:05:09 AM 30.7 50.2 3:30:09 AM 39.3 56.6 4:18:09 AM 32.5 50 5:06:09 AM 40.2 56 3:31:09 AM 0 49.7 4:19:09 AM 29.6 50.1 5:07:09 AM 0 49.9 3:32:09 AM 37.6 53.8 4:20:09 AM 28.7 50 5:08:09 AM 43.5 54.6 3:33:09 AM 36.8 53.4 4:21:09 AM 39.9 50.2 5:09:09 AM 27.3 50 Location 2 (Between Lot 98 and 99): Raw Data 5:10:09 AM 40.9 55.1 5:58:09 AM 50.7 59.2 5:11:09 AM 41.3 50.3 5:59:09 AM 53.6 61.3 5:12:09 AM 46.3 60.2 5:13:09 AM 22 52.7 5:14:09 AM 48.2 56.9 5:15:09 AM 6.3 50 5:16:09 AM 45.9 54.3 5:17:09 AM 16.7 50 5:18:09 AM 45.6 57.1 5:19:09 AM 41.9 55 5:20:09 AM 6.3 50 5:21:09 AM 8.4 50 5:22:09AM 44.8 55.8 5:23:09 AM 36.8 52.1 5:24:09 AM 47 57.5 5:25:09 AM 39.7 50.4 5:26:09 AM 46.7 58.2 5:27:09AM 47.7 54.8 5:28:09 AM 51.5 61.2 5:29:09 AM 50.6 55.2 5:30:09 AM 49.7 50.9 5:31:09 AM 51.4 56.7 5:32:09 AM 51.5 58.9 5:33:09 AM 45.8 56 5:34:09AM 42.2 50.3 5:35:09 AM 49.8 55.4 5:36:09 AM 49.1 51.6 5:37:09 AM 50.6 57.6 5:38:09 AM 45.3 53.5 5:39:09 AM 51.1 60.3 5:40:09 AM 47.4 57.6 5:41:09 AM 42.5 57.2 5:42:09 AM 43 54.1 5:43:09 AM 40.7 54.3 5:44:09AM 51 56.6 5:45:09 AM 51.4 58.1 5:46:09 AM 51.6 57.7 5:47:09 AM 48 57.7 5:48:09AM 50.5 59.3 5:49:09 AM 51.7 57.9 5:50:09 AM 50.7 58.3 5:51:09 AM 52.1 58.1 5:52:09 AM 50.4 56 5:53:09 AM 48.9 58.3 5:54:09 AM 52.5 56.7 5:55:09 AM 52.3 57.3 5:56:09 AM 51.3 65.6 5:57:09 AM 45.5 54.3 Location 3 (Lot 99): Raw Data Lavg Lmax 10:46:09 PM 51.5 53.4 11:34:09 PM 39.7 51.8 Time (dBA) (dBA) 10:47:09 PM 52.2 55 11:35:09 PM 0 49.8 10:00:09 PM 52.9 59 10:48:09 PM 51 51.7 11:36:09 PM 27 51.3 10:01:09 PM 53.3 59.8 10:49:09 PM 51.3 54.9 11:37:09 PM 44.8 53.1 10:02:09 PM 50.8 51.2 10:50:09 PM 52.1 54.1 11:38:09 PM 0 49.6 10:03:09 PM 51.3 54 10:51:09 PM 52.3 54.6 11:39:09 PM 0 49.6 10:04:09 PM 52.1 54.4 10:52:09 PM 42.2 52 11:40:09 PM 0 49.7 10:05:09 PM 51.6 54.4 10:53:09 PM 6.3 50 11:41:09 PM 0 49.3 10:06:09 PM 50.7 51.5 10:54:09 PM 33.2 50.1 11:42:09 PM 44.4 50.7 10:07:09 PM 50.9 51.5 10:55:09 PM 43.1 52.2 11:43:09 PM 0 49.7 10:08:09 PM 50.4 50.9 10:56:09 PM 37.8 52.4 11:44:09 PM 0 49.5 10:09:09 PM 50.3 50.8 10:57:09 PM 45.1 51.2 11:45:09 PM 0 49.6 10:10:09 PM 51.3 52.7 10:58:09 PM 29.1 50.9 11:46:09 PM 0 49.4 10:11:09 PM 48.8 50.8 10:59:09 PM 26.8 50.2 11:47:09 PM 0 49.4 10:12:09 PM 22.3 50 11:00:09 PM 36.7 50.9 11:48:09 PM 38.1 52.5 10:13:09 PM 28.5 50.1 11:01:09 PM 38.4 51.2 11:49:09 PM 38.9 51.5 10:14:09 PM 46.9 51.4 11:02:09 PM 46.4 54.2 11:50:09 PM 0 49.4 10:15:09 PM 43.9 50.5 11:03:09 PM 48.1 52.5 11:51:09 PM 32 50.7 10:16:09 PM 49.5 53.9 11:04:09 PM 0 49.9 11:52:09 PM 0 49.4 10:17:09 PM 48.2 50.7 11:05:09 PM 47.5 54.1 11:53:09 PM 0 49.5 10:18:09 PM 52 57.5 11:06:09 PM 9.5 50 11:54:09 PM 0 49.8 10:19:09 PM 44.7 50.6 11:07:09 PM 38.5 51.1 11:55:09 PM 24.4 50.2 10:20:09 PM 48.6 52.7 11:08:09 PM 45.1 53.2 11:56:09 PM 0 49.8 10:21:09 PM 52.1 54.8 11:09:09 PM 41.6 51.7 11:57:09 PM 0 49.4 10:22:09 PM 55.2 65.1 11:10:09 PM 44.9 53.1 11:58:09 PM 38.8 50.9 10:23:09 PM 50.3 63.7 11:11:09 PM 0 49.9 11:59:09 PM 23.5 50.2 10:24:09 PM 38.9 50.6 11:12:09 PM 37.7 50.7 12:00:09 AM 0 49.8 10:25:09 PM 47.7 58.1 11:13:09 PM 0 49.5 12:01 :09 AM 39.9 53 10:26:09 PM 46.9 57 11:14:09 PM 0 49.5 12:02:09 AM 45.4 52.4 10:27:09 PM 29.2 50.1 11:15:09 PM 0 49.6 12:03:09 AM 41.8 52.2 10:28:09 PM 41.4 51.9 11:16:09 PM 39.9 50.3 12:04:09 AM 50.6 55.3 10:29:09 PM 46.5 51.3 11:17:09 PM 45.4 53.4 12:05:09 AM 53.2 57.9 10:30:09 PM 48.7 51.4 11:18:09 PM 47.2 57.3 12:06:09 AM 35.9 51.9 10:31:09 PM 49.7 57.3 11:19:09 PM 48.1 54.2 12:07:09 AM 17.8 50.1 10:32:09 PM 52.2 55.4 11:20:09 PM 0 49.9 12:08:09 AM 36.5 51.2 10:33:09 PM 51.2 52.3 11:21:09 PM 31.8 50.3 12:09:09 AM 34.8 50.5 10:34:09 PM 51.2 51.8 11:22:09 PM 42.9 51.5 12:10:09 AM 42.2 51.7 10:35:09 PM 51.5 53.4 11:23:09 PM 0 49.9 12:11:09 AM 0 49 10:36:09 PM 51.1 52.1 11:24:09 PM 32.8 50.3 12:12:09 AM 0 49.3 10:37:09 PM 51 51.4 11:25:09 PM 43.2 51.5 12:13:09 AM 0 49 10:38:09 PM 51.2 51.7 11:26:09 PM 42.9 53.3 12:14:09 AM 39.6 51.2 10:39:09 PM 51.3 53.6 11:27:09 PM 0 49.6 12:15:09 AM 0 49.2 10:40:09 PM 51.3 52.3 11:28:09 PM 0 49.7 12:16:09 AM 0 49 10:41 :09 PM 51.2 52.1 11:29:09 PM 0 49.5 12:17:09 AM 0 49 10:42:09 PM 50.8 51.4 11:30:09 PM 0 49.6 12:18:09 AM 0 48.8 10:43:09 PM 51.1 51.4 11:31:09 PM 0 49.8 12:19:09 AM 0 48.2 10:44:09 PM 52.5 58.2 11:32:09 PM 40.3 51.9 12:20:09 AM 0 48.3 10:45:09 PM 54.6 58.5 11:33:09 PM 0 49.6 12:21 :09 AM 0 48.2 Location 3 (Lot 99): Raw Data 12:22:09 AM 30.8 52 1:10:09 AM 0 48 1:58:09 AM 0 48.8 12:23:09 AM 34.9 51.8 1:11:09 AM 0 48 1:59:09 AM 0 49.6 12:24:09 AM 0 47.8 1 :12:09 AM 0 47.8 2:00:09 AM 0 48.6 12:25:09 AM 0 48 1:13:09AM 0 48 2:01:09 AM 22.1 50.2 12:26:09 AM 0 48 1 :14:09 AM 0 48.1 2:02:09 AM 0 49.9 12:27:09 AM 0 48.1 1:15:09 AM 0 47.8 2:03:09 AM 37.3 50.8 12:28:09 AM 0 48.1 1:16:09 AM 0 47.9 2:04:09 AM 0 49.3 12:29:09 AM 0 48 1:17:09 AM 0 47.7 2:05:09 AM 0 49 12:30:09 AM 0 49.9 1:18:09 AM 0 47.6 2:06:09 AM 0 49.2 12:31:09 AM 16.1 50.4 1:19:09 AM 0 47.9 2:07:09 AM 0 49.3 12:32:09 AM 39.4 53.5 1:20:09 AM 0 48.1 2:08:09 AM 0 49.1 12:33:09 AM 42.6 53 1:21:09 AM 0 48.1 2:09:09 AM 0 49.1 12:34:09 AM 0 48.7 1:22:09 AM 0 48 2:10:09 AM 0 49.1 12:35:09 AM 14 50 1:23:09 AM 0 47.9 2:11:09 AM 0 49.7 12:36:09 AM 34.8 52.1 1:24:09 AM 0 47.9 2:12:09 AM 44.9 58 12:37:09 AM 21.3 50.4 1:25:09 AM 0 47.9 2:13:09 AM 34.8 51.3 12:38:09 AM 51.2 55.6 1:26:09 AM 0 48.1 2:14:09 AM 0 48.8 12:39:09 AM 0 49.9 1:27:09 AM 0 47.8 2:15:09 AM 0 48.4 12:40:09 AM 37 58.2 1:28:09 AM 0 48.1 2:16:09 AM 0 48.7 12:41:09 AM 41.8 58.3 1:29:09 AM 0 48.2 2:17:09 AM 0 48.6 12:42:09 AM 0 48 1:30:09 AM 38.5 51.6 2:18:09 AM 0 48.7 12:43:09 AM 0 48.3 1:31:09 AM 0 49.5 2:19:09 AM 0 48.5 12:44:09 AM 0 48.1 1:32:09 AM 0 48.1 2:20:09 AM 0 48.4 12:45:09 AM 0 48.8 1:33:09 AM 0 48.1 2:21:09 AM 0 48.5 12:46:09 AM 0 49.3 1:34:09 AM 0 48.1 2:22:09 AM 0 48 12:47:09 AM 41.4 51 1:35:09 AM 0 47.9 2:23:09 AM 0 48.1 12:48:09 AM 0 49.9 1:36:09 AM 0 48.1 2:24:09 AM 0 48.2 12:49:09 AM 37.6 51.4 1:37:09 AM 0 47.9 2:25:09 AM 0 48.2 12:50:09 AM 32.2 50.9 1:38:09 AM 0 48 2:26:09 AM 0 48.2 12:51:09 AM 0 49 1:39:09 AM 29.3 51.5 2:27:09 AM 0 48.3 12:52:09 AM 51.5 63.5 1:40:09 AM 0 47.9 2:28:09 AM 0 48.3 12:53:09 AM 64.7 69.1 1:41:09 AM 0 48 2:29:09 AM 0 48.5 12:54:09 AM 51.3 59.9 1:42:09 AM 0 48.1 2:30:09 AM 0 48.4 12:55:09AM 0 49 1:43:09 AM 0 47.9 2:31:09 AM 0 48.1 12:56:09 AM 0 48.7 1:44:09 AM 0 47.8 2:32:09 AM 46 56.3 12:57:09 AM 25.4 50.6 1:45:09 AM 0 48 2:33:09 AM 0 48.1 12:58:09 AM 27.6 51 1:46:09 AM 23.6 50.2 2:34:09 AM 0 49.5 12:59:09 AM 0 48.6 1:47:09 AM 46.2 54.7 2:35:09 AM 0 48.2 1:00:09 AM 0 48.8 1:48:09 AM 36 54.1 2:36:09 AM 0 48.2 1:01:09 AM 0 48.4 1:49:09 AM 0 48.5 2:37:09 AM 0 48.3 1:02:09 AM 0 48.2 1:50:09 AM 0 48.2 2:38:09 AM 0 48.3 1:03:09 AM 0 48.2 1:51:09 AM 0 49.5 2:39:09 AM 0 48.2 1:04:09 AM 0 48.1 1:52:09 AM 35.2 52 2:40:09 AM 0 48.2 1:05:09 AM 0 48.2 1:53:09 AM 41.1 53.5 2:41:09 AM 0 47.9 1:06:09 AM 0 48.4 1:54:09 AM 0 48.2 2:42:09AM 0 48 1:07:09 AM 0 48.1 1:55:09 AM 24.1 50.7 2:43:09AM 0 48.1 1:08:09 AM 0 48.1 1:56:09 AM 28.2 50.7 2:44:09AM 19.6 50 1:09:09 AM 0 47.9 1:57:09 AM 0 48.5 2:45:09AM 0 48.1 Location 3 (Lot 99): Raw Data 2:46:09 AM 0 48.3 3:34:09 AM 0 48.5 4:22:09AM 0 49.7 2:47:09 AM 0 48.3 3:35:09 AM 23.4 52.2 4:23:09 AM 0 49.1 2:48:09 AM 0 49.6 3:36:09 AM 47.9 54.2 4:24:09 AM 0 48.7 2:49:09AM 0 48.2 3:37:09 AM 37.5 51.4 4:25:09 AM 0 48.6 2:50:09 AM 27.8 50.5 3:38:09 AM 0 48.2 4:26:09AM 28.7 50.8 2:51:09 AM 35.6 50.9 3:39:09 AM 0 48.3 4:27:09AM 43.1 53.2 2:52:09 AM 0 49.8 3:40:09 AM 0 48.3 4:28:09AM 46.6 55.5 2:53:09 AM 0 48.2 3:41:09 AM 0 48.3 4:29:09AM 0 48.9 2:54:09 AM 0 47.9 3:42:09AM 28.6 50.4 4:30:09AM 0 49.2 2:55:09 AM 0 48.3 3:43:09 AM 41.7 53.1 4:31:09 AM 40.2 51.2 2:56:09 AM 0 49.4 3:44:09AM 0 49.1 4:32:09 AM 0 49.6 2:57:09 AM 25.5 51.1 3:45:09 AM 0 49.8 4:33:09 AM 35.1 51.7 2:58:09 AM 0 47.9 3:46:09 AM 37 52.6 4:34:09AM 42.1 52.4 2:59:09 AM 0 48 3:47:09AM 33.4 52.3 4:35:09 AM 32 51.3 3:00:09 AM 0 48.4 3:48:09 AM 0 48.2 4:36:09AM 32.2 51.3 3:01:09 AM 0 48.2 3:49:09AM 41.6 52.2 4:37:09AM 31.6 50.6 3:02:09 AM 0 48.1 3:50:09 AM 0 48.4 4:38:09 AM 39.7 51.4 3:03:09 AM 0 48.3 3:51:09 AM 0 48.5 4:39:09 AM 41.5 53.8 3:04:09 AM 0 48.4 3:52:09 AM 0 48.5 4:40:09AM 46 53.7 3:05:09 AM 0 48.4 3:53:09 AM 46.2 55.9 4:41:09 AM 38 51.1 3:06:09 AM 0 48.8 3:54:09 AM 23.2 50.4 4:42:09AM 41.1 53.4 3:07:09 AM 0 48.5 3:55:09 AM 19.9 50.2 4:43:09AM 0 49.5 3:08:09 AM 0 48.3 3:56:09 AM 24.2 50.3 4:44:09AM 21.8 50.3 3:09:09 AM 0 48.4 3:57:09 AM 26.7 50.8 4:45:09AM · 37.1 52 3:10:09 AM 0 48.5 3:58:09 AM 0 48.3 4:46:09 AM 36.7 52.1 3:11:09 AM 0 48.6 3:59:09 AM 0 48.3 4:47:09AM 47.3 55.5 3:12:09 AM 0 48.5 4:00:09 AM 0 48.4 4:48:09 AM 48.5 55 3:13:09 AM 0 48.7 4:01:09 AM 0 49.8 4:49:09AM 45.9 54.5 3:14:09 AM 0 48.6 4:02:09AM 0 49 4:50:09 AM 0 49.5 3:15:09 AM 0 48.5 4:03:09 AM 28.1 50.6 4:51:09 AM 0 49.4 3:16:09 AM 0 48.5 4:04:09 AM 33.2 51.4 4:52:09 AM 0 48.8 3:17:09AM 0 48.5 4:05:09 AM 0 49.6 4:53:09AM 0 49.8 3:18:09 AM 37.5 50.6 4:06:09 AM 0 48.5 4:54:09AM 39.2 52.9 3:19:09 AM 0 48.7 4:07:09AM 0 48.5 4:55:09 AM 44.8 53.3 3:20:09 AM 0 49.9 4:08:09 AM 0 48.5 4:56:09 AM 47.5 54.4 3:21:09 AM 0 48.7 4:09:09 AM 0 48.6 4:57:09AM 42.5 53.3 3:22:09 AM 0 48.5 4:10:09 AM 0 48.6 4:58:09 AM 44.8 52.9 3:23:09 AM 0 48.7 4:11:09 AM 0 48.3 4:59:09 AM 44.2 51.9 3:24:09AM 42.9 53.3 4:12:09 AM 28.6 50.6 5:00:09 AM 24.7 50.5 3:25:09 AM 46.4 53.2 4:13:09 AM 39.3 51.8 5:01:09 AM 42.9 52.5 3:26:09 AM 0 48.5 4:14:09 AM 0 48.2 5:02:09 AM 45.5 53.8 3:27:09 AM 0 49.9 4:15:09 AM 0 48.5 5:03:09 AM 23.6 50.1 3:28:09 AM 46.5 57.5 4:16:09 AM 0 48.4 5:04:09 AM 41.4 51.5 3:29:09 AM 0 48.4 4:17:09 AM 0 48.6 5:05:09 AM 40.9 51.5 3:30:09 AM 0 48.2 4:18:09 AM 0 48.4 5:06:09 AM 0 48.6 3:31:09 AM 0 48.4 4:19:09 AM 0 48.3 5:07:09 AM 0 48.5 3:32:09 AM 44.7 58.5 4:20:09 AM 0 48.1 5:08:09 AM 0 48.4 3:33:09 AM 40.3 58.3 4:21:09 AM 0 48.5 5:09:09 AM 30.1 50.2 Location 3 (Lot 99): Raw Data 5:10:09 AM 0 49.7 5:58:09 AM 51 56 5:11:09 AM 0 49.2 5:59:09 AM 45.1 55.3 5:12:09 AM 0 49.1 5:13:09 AM 0 48.1 5:14:09 AM 0 48.1 5:15:09 AM 44.1 53.5 5:16:09 AM 47.3 54.7 5:17:09 AM 45.6 54.4 5:18:09 AM 46.7 53.1 5:19:09 AM 0 49.3 5:20:09 AM 27.9 50.5 5:21:09 AM 39.2 52.6 5:22:09AM 23.9 50.2 5:23:09 AM 29.3 52.6 5:24:09 AM 43.5 54.5 5:25:09 AM 45 54 5:26:09 AM 42.9 51.7 5:27:09 AM 48 54.2 5:28:09 AM 37.9 54.6 5:29:09 AM 46.3 54.5 5:30:09 AM 42.3 52.5 5:31:09 AM 0 48.5 5:32:09 AM 39.1 52.2 5:33:09 AM 30.2 51.2 5:34:09 AM 31.4 50.8 5:35:09 AM 44.9 51.7 5:36:09 AM 37.6 52.6 5:37:09 AM 42.3 53 5:38:09 AM 45.4 53.4 5:39:09 AM 34.6 52.6 5:40:09 AM 40.6 52.7 5:41:09 AM 50.6 54.7 5:42:09AM 50.4 54.9 5:43:09AM 48.8 55.2 5:44:09AM 50.2 56.1 5:45:09AM 52.5 55.6 5:46:09 AM 53.8 55.6 5:47:09 AM 48.8 54.2 5:48:09 AM 50.9 54.5 5:49:09 AM 53.3 59.2 5:50:09 AM 57 62.2 5:51:09 AM 51.1 55.6 5:52:09 AM 52.7 56.7 5:53:09 AM 49.4 53.1 5:54:09 AM 52.4 56.1 5:55:09 AM 47.5 56 5:56:09 AM 42.7 52.5 5:57:09 AM 45.4 53.6 Location 4 (Lot 98): Raw Data Lavg Lmax 10:46:09 PM 50.8 52.2 11:34:09 PM 40.3 53.6 Time (dBA) (dBA) 10:47:09 PM 50.6 50.9 11:35:09 PM 41.2 53 10:00:09 PM 52.4 58 10:48:09 PM 50.4 50.9 11:36:09 PM 35.8 50.9 10:01:09 PM 52.4 53 10:49:09 PM 50.8 52.7 11:37:09 PM 0 49.3 10:02:09 PM 52.3 53.3 10:50:09 PM 51.1 52.9 11:38:09 PM 39.3 55 10:03:09 PM 52.6 55.7 10:51:09 PM 48.6 52.7 11:39:09 PM 49.1 54.2 10:04:09 PM 52.1 53.9 10:52:09 PM 37.1 51.4 11:40:09 PM 51.8 53 10:05:09 PM 52.2 53.4 10:53:09 PM 0 48.3 11:41:09 PM 52.8 54.6 10:06:09 PM 52.3 55.2 10:54:09 PM 0 48.2 11:42:09 PM 53.9 55.2 10:07:09 PM 51.8 52.1 10:55:09 PM 0 47.8 11:43:09 PM 50.7 53.4 10:08:09 PM 52.7 57.1 10:56:09 PM 0 47.6 11:44:09 PM 50.1 54.5 10:09:09 PM 52.7 54.2 10:57:09 PM 0 47.7 11:45:09 PM 0 48.9 10:10:09 PM 52.4 53.6 10:58:09 PM 0 47.8 11:46:09 PM 0 48.5 10:11:09 PM 51.4 56.9 10:59:09 PM 32.1 51.2 11:47:09 PM 33.3 51.4 10:12:09 PM 47.6 52.3 11:00:09 PM 27 50.9 11:48:09 PM 32.3 51.6 10:13:09 PM 49.2 52 11:01:09 PM 0 49.3 11:49:09 PM 27.8 51 10:14:09 PM 44 53.1 11:02:09 PM 0 48 11:50:09 PM 0 48.5 10:15:09 PM 43.5 53.5 11:03:09 PM 36.5 51.1 11:51:09 PM 0 49.3 10:16:09 PM 0 49.8 11:04:09 PM 44.4 53.4 11:52:09 PM 0 48.8 10:17:09 PM 42.6 52.1 11:05:09 PM 0 49.4 11:53:09 PM 0 49.3 10:18:09 PM 0 49.8 11:06:09 PM 0 48.1 11:54:09 PM 0 49 10:19:09 PM 44.8 51.4 11:07:09 PM 33.1 51.5 11:55:09 PM 0 48.6 10:20:09 PM 43.1 51.1 11:08:09 PM 29.5 51.5 11:56:09 PM 37.5 51.1 10:21:09 PM 28.9 50.4 11:09:09 PM 38.6 52.6 11:57:09 PM 0 48.9 10:22:09 PM-46.8 53.5 11:10:09 PM 39.6 53.3 11:58:09 PM 7.9 50.4 10:23:09 PM 50.8 53.8 11:11:09 PM 0 48.6 11:59:09 PM 28.4 50.8 10:24:09 PM 49.5 51.6 11 :12:09 PM 26 51.3 12:00:09 AM 22.7 51.7 10:25:09 PM 47.3 50.3 11:13:09 PM 23.8 51 12:01:09 AM 30.5 50.6 10:26:09 PM 49.7 51.4 11:14:09 PM 0 48 12:02:09 AM 16.3 50 10:27:09 PM 50.2 50.5 11:15:09 PM 0 48.1 12:03:09 AM 37.9 52.2 10:28:09 PM 49.3 50.4 11:16:09 PM 37.7 55.7 12:04:09 AM 19.3 51.6 10:29:09 PM 48.4 50.3 11:17:09 PM 39.5 51.8 12:05:09 AM 19.5 51.4 10:30:09 PM 49.5 51.5 11:18:09 PM 0 49.4 12:06:09 AM 0 49.5 10:31:09 PM 46.6 54.9 11:19:09 PM 0 49.1 12:07:09 AM 0 47.1 10:32:09 PM 51.3 55.3 11:20:09 PM 0 49.1 12:08:09 AM 0 49.4 10:33:09 PM 50.8 56.1 11:21:09 PM 31.6 51 12:09:09 AM 0 49.4 10:34:09 PM 49.9 50.6 11:22:09 PM 30.1 55.4 12:10:09 AM 0 48 10:35:09 PM 50.3 51 11:23:09 PM 0 48.6 12:11:09 AM 0 47.1 10:36:09 PM 50.5 52.9 11:24:09 PM 0 48.3 12:12:09 AM 25.2 51.6 10:37:09 PM 50.6 52.4 11:25:09 PM 0 48.4 12:13:09 AM 33 50.8 10:38:09 PM 50.3 52.1 11:26:09 PM 0 48.6 12:14:09 AM 30.2 54.1 10:39:09 PM 50.3 51.4 11:27:09 PM 0 48.5 12:15:09 AM 23.8 51.2 10:40:09 PM 55.4 62.1 11:28:09 PM 0 48.4 12:16:09 AM 0 48 10:41 :09 PM 60.3 68.4 11:29:09 PM 41.3 54.8 12:17:09 AM 0 47 10:42:09 PM 50.8 51.5 11:30:09 PM 36.6 53 12:18:09 AM 0 47.3 10:43:09 PM 51 53.1 11:31:09 PM 42.3 51.8 12:19:09 AM 29.8 51.5 10:44:09 PM 50.7 51.8 11:32:09 PM 45.7 51.2 12:20:09 AM 0 47 10:45:09 PM 50.8 52.4 11:33:09 PM 39.3 51.6 12:21:09 AM 0 47.7 f Location 4 (Lot 98): Raw Data 12:22:09 AM 0 47.9 1:10:09AM 0 46.6 1:58:09 AM 0 47.8 12:23:09 AM 0 46.8 1:11:09 AM 0 46.3 1:59:09 AM 0 48 12:24:09 AM 0 46.5 1:12:09 AM 0 46.2 2:00:09 AM 0 44.9 12:25:09 AM 0 46.3 1:13:09 AM 0 46.5 2:01:09 AM 0 44.9 12:26:09 AM 0 46.4 1:14:09 AM 0 46.2 2:02:09 AM 0 44.8 12:27:09 AM 0 47.1 1:15:09AM 0 46.4 2:03:09 AM 0 47.7 12:28:09 AM 0 46.4 1:16:09 AM 0 47.6 2:04:09 AM 0 48.2 12:29:09 AM 0 46.3 1:17:09AM 0 46.8 2:05:09 AM 0 45.1 12:30:09 AM 28.6 52.4 1:18:09 AM 0 45.4 2:06:09AM 0 44.7 12:31:09 AM 0 48.1 1:19:09 AM 0 45.8 2:07:09 AM 0 46.8 12:32:09 AM 0 49.1 1:20:09 AM 0 46.2 2:08:09 AM 0 45.8 12:33:09 AM 0 47.4 1:21:09 AM 0 45.4 2:09:09 AM 0 44.4 12:34:09 AM 0 47.1 1:22:09 AM 0 45.9 2:10:09 AM 0 44.3 12:35:09 AM 0 47.5 1:23:09 AM 0 46.2 2:11:09 AM 0 44.2 12:36:09 AM 0 49.1 1:24:09 AM 0 46.6 2:12:09 AM 0 44.3 12:37:09 AM 0 46.9 1:25:09 AM 0 46.1 2:13:09 AM 0 44.2 12:38:09 AM 0 48.9 1:26:09 AM 0 45.9 2:14:09 AM 0 44.2 12:39:09 AM 0 49.7 1:27:09 AM 0 48.2 2:15:09 AM 0 44.1 12:40:09 AM 0 47.2 1:28:09 AM 0 45.4 2:16:09 AM 0 44.2 12:41:09 AM 0 49.4 1:29:09 AM 0 44.9 2:17:09 AM 0 44.1 12:42:09 AM 0 47.1 1:30:09 AM 0 44.9 2:18:09 AM 0 45.1 12:43:09 AM 28.1 50.7 1:31:09 AM 0 47.8 2:19:09 AM 0 45.1 12:44:09 AM 0 47.3 1:32:09 AM 0 45.1 2:20:09 AM 0 44.9 12:45:09 AM 0 46.3 1:33:09 AM 0 44.7 2:21:09 AM 0 44.8 12:46:09 AM 0 46 1:34:09 AM 0 44.7 2:22:09 AM 0 44.8 12:47:09 AM 0 46.1 1:35:09 AM 0 47.9 2:23:09 AM 0 44.9 12:48:09 AM 0 45.9 1:36:09 AM 0 49.4 2:24:09 AM 0 45 12:49:09 AM 0 46.3 1:37:09 AM 0 46.6 2:25:09 AM 0 44.7 12:50:09 AM 0 46.6 1:38:09 AM 0 45.8 2:26:09AM 0 44.6 12:51:09 AM 0 47.2 1:39:09 AM 6.3 50 2:27:09 AM 0 48.7 12:52:09 AM 0 47 1:40:09 AM 0 46.5 2:28:09 AM 0 44.2 12:53:09 AM 0 48.1 1:41:09 AM 20.4 51.7 2:29:09AM 0 44.2 12:54:09 AM 0 48.3 1:42:09 AM 19.6 50.3 2:30:09 AM 0 44.2 12:55:09 AM 15 50.4 1:43:09 AM 33 55.2 2:31:09 AM 0 44.4 12:56:09 AM 0 47.7 1:44:09 AM 0 47 2:32:09 AM 0 44.2 12:57:09 AM 0 49.5 1:45:09 AM 0 45.7 2:33:09 AM 0 44.3 12:58:09 AM 0 46.6 1:46:09 AM 0 47.5 2:34:09AM 0 44.3 12:59:09 AM 0 45.9 1:47:09 AM 0 49.4 2:35:09 AM 0 44.2 1:00:09 AM 0 46 1:48:09 AM 32.6 51.5 2:36:09 AM 0 46.6 1:01:09 AM 0 45.7 1:49:09 AM 0 48.2 2:37:09AM 0 45.8 1:02:09 AM 0 45.9 1:50:09 AM 0 48.7 2:38:09 AM 0 44.8 1:03:09 AM 0 45.6 1:51:09 AM 0 47 2:39:09 AM 0 45.6 1:04:09 AM 0 47.5 1:52:09 AM 0 47.8 2:40:09 AM 0 44.6 1:05:09 AM 0 45.5 1:53:09 AM 0 47.7 2:41:09 AM 0 46.3 1:06:09 AM 0 45.9 1:54:09 AM 0 45.8 2:42:09AM 0 44.5 1:07:09 AM 0 46.4 1:55:09 AM ·O 46.8 2:43:09 AM 0 44.5 1:08:09 AM 0 47.4 1:56:09 AM 13.5 50.1 2:44:09 AM 0 44.4 1:09:09 AM 0 46.3 1:57:09 AM 0 46.2 2:45:09 AM 0 44 Location 4 (Lot 98): Raw Data 2:46:09AM 0 44 3:34:09AM 0 45.1 4:22:09AM 0 48.5 2:47:09AM 0 44.1 3:35:09 AM 0 45.7 4:23:09 AM 0 45.2 2:48:09AM 0 44 3:36:09 AM 0 44.5 4:24:09AM 0 42.9 2:49:09AM 0 48.1 3:37:09 AM 0 43.9 4:25:09AM 0 42.8 2:50:09 AM 0 44.2 3:38:09 AM 0 48.3 4:26:09 AM 0 42.9 2:51:09 AM 0 48.3 3:39:09 AM 0 44 4:27:09 AM 0 48.7 2:52:09 AM 0 48.9 3:40:09AM 0 43.2 4:28:09 AM 0 43.5 2:53:09 AM 0 46.2 3:41:09 AM 0 43.4 4:29:09 AM 0 48.1 2:54:09AM 0 44.9 3:42:09AM 0 46.3 4:30:09 AM 0 44 2:55:09 AM 0 44.9 3:43:09AM 0 43.2 4:31:09 AM 0 42.9 2:56:09AM 26.2 52.7 3:44:09AM 0 44.9 4:32:09 AM 0 42.8 2:57:09 AM 0 48.3 3:45:09AM 0 48.4 4:33:09 AM 0 46.4 2:58:09 AM 0 49.3 3:46:09AM 0 46.9 4:34:09 AM 15.5 50.2 2:59:09 AM 0 48.8 3:47:09 AM 0 43.3 4:35:09AM 0 43 3:00:09 AM 0 46.3 3:48:09AM 0 43.2 4:36:09AM 0 44.9 3:01:09 AM 0 44.3 3:49:09AM 0 43.6 4:37:09 AM 0 49.6 3:02:09 AM 0 46.4 3:50:09 AM 0 46.5 4:38:09 AM 0 43.7 3:03:09 AM 0 44.2 3:51:09 AM 0 43.6 4:39:09AM 0 49.8 3:04:09 AM 0 44.1 3:52:09 AM 0 43.4 4:40:09 AM 0 45.2 3:05:09 AM 0 43.7 3:53:09 AM 0 43.4 4:41:09 AM 0 44.2 3:06:09 AM 0 43.9 3:54:09 AM 0 43.5 4:42:09AM 0 48.1 3:07:09 AM 0 43.6 3:55:09 AM 0 43.5 4:43:09AM 0 48.4 3:08:09 AM 0 43.5 3:56:09 AM 0 47.1 4:44:09AM 29 51.8 3:09:09 AM 0 43.5 3:57:09 AM 0 43.4 4:45:09AM 0 42.8 3:10:09 AM 0 43.5 3:58:09 AM 0 43 4:46:09AM 0 43.5 3:11:09AM 0 43.5 3:59:09 AM 0 43.1 4:47:09 AM 0 43.6 3:12:09 AM 0 43.6 4:00:09 AM 0 43 4:48:09AM 0 43.5 3:13:09 AM 0 43.6 4:01:09 AM 0 43.4 4:49:09AM 0 43.5 3:14:09 AM 0 46.8 4:02:09 AM 0 46.4 4:50:09 AM 22.3 51.1 3:15:09 AM 0 46.5 4:03:09AM 0 47.4 4:51:09 AM 16.3 50.4 3:16:09 AM 0 43.8 4:04:09AM 0 45.2 4:52:09AM 0 48.1 3:17:09 AM 0 43.9 4:05:09AM 0 43.2 4:53:09AM 0 48.5 3:18:09 AM 0 44 4:06:09 AM 0 43.2 4:54:09 AM 0 49 3:19:09 AM 0 44.9 4:07:09AM 0 43.6 4:55:09AM 0 42.8 3:20:09AM 0 45.9 4:08:09AM 0 43.1 4:56:09 AM 0 49.4 3:21:09 AM 0 44 4:09:09 AM 0 44 4:57:09 AM 0 48.9 3:22:09 AM 0 43.6 4:10:09AM 0 43.9 4:58:09 AM 0 47.7 3:23:09 AM 0 43.8 4:11:09 AM 0 43.6 4:59:09 AM 0 47.9 3:24:09 AM 0 43.7 4:12:09 AM 0 49.1 5:00:09 AM 0 46.7 3:25:09 AM 0 43.6 4:13:09 AM 0 43.7 5:01:09 AM 0 46.7 3:26:09 AM 0 43.6 4:14:09 AM 0 43.8 5:02:09AM 0 43 3:27:09 AM 0 43.8 4:15:09 AM 0 47.8 5:03:09 AM 0 49.4 3:28:09 AM 0 43.6 4:16:09 AM 0 43.6 5:04:09 AM 0 46.7 3:29:09 AM 0 43.6 4:17:09 AM 0 41.1 5:05:09 AM 0 46.2 3:30:09 AM 0 43.5 4:18:09 AM 0 43.7 5:06:09 AM 0 49.5 3:31:09 AM 0 49 4:19:09 AM 0 44.3 5:07:09 AM 0 45 3:32:09 AM 27.2 51 4:20:09AM 0 47.7 5:08:09 AM 0 46.2 3:33:09 AM 0 44.3 4:21:09 AM 0 49.1 5:09:09 AM 0 47.8 Location 4 (Lot 98): Raw Data 5:10:09 AM 0 43.8 5:58:09 AM 36.9 54 5:11:09 AM 30.6 53 5:59:09 AM 0 49.6 5:12:09 AM 25.6 51.9 5:13:09 AM 0 46.1 5:14:09 AM 0 42.9 5:15:09 AM 0 43.2 5:16:09 AM 0 48.7 5:17:09 AM 0 46.7 5:18:09 AM 0 43.1 5:19:09 AM 0 49.3 5:20:09AM 0 49.1 5:21:09 AM 33.2 53.3 5:22:09 AM 30.5 52.8 5:23:09AM 0 44.8 5:24:09 AM 0 43.2 5:25:09 AM 30.7 52.9 5:26:09AM 0 47.4 5:27:09 AM 32.9 52.2 5:28:09 AM 0 43.9 5:29:09 AM 0 48.6 5:30:09 AM 0 49.7 5:31:09 AM 39.7 52.1 5:32:09 AM 19.8 50.4 5:33:09 AM 0 49 5:34:09 AM 37.9 52 5:35:09 AM 28.4 51.5 5:36:09 AM 0 49.7 5:37:09 AM 0 48.2 5:38:09 AM 0 47.9 5:39:09 AM 0 49.6 5:40:09 AM 23.9 51.1 5:41:09 AM 0 47 5:42:09 AM 25.2 50.2 5:43:09 AM 29 50.5 5:44:09AM 30.4 52.3 5:45:09AM 37.3 52.4 5:46:09AM 29 50.8 5:47:09 AM 44.7 52.8 5:48:09 AM 42.3 53.3 5:49:09 AM 19.8 50.8 5:50:09 AM 15.2 50.1 5:51:09 AM 39.7 52.2 5:52:09 AM 18 50.3 5:53:09 AM 43.6 53.9 5:54:09 AM 38.8 61.1 5:55:09 AM 47 58.2 5:56:09 AM 39.5 52.6 5:57:09 AM 41.6 54.4 8-26-1999 2:48PM AUC-28-99 THU 06: 49 FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: ~~ lMrl 0wner. please t1Yd trns opfir,ll~ald be ue yov thto!JShly ul'ldemtM\d 1he QPtioftes before $igring. Th~ op'6or\ you d\oose w.11 an•yru p-qment d the d•vei<Jped Spedar T•asseased on your~any. lhi$option is waitabte only at tha tm~ d the first Wtmng pen'l1tt~. Property ownertlfgnature it ~ before Q tA,itdlng permihvitt ~ ~-Your/signst.ure-is c;n&m1'19 h tlCCt.Jffle1' of all ~ and OWMIShipinfonnaiOn st.awn. ~$ Parcel Number. or APN ar\d LotNumbcr.!f nt.:tl yet subcivid&cl <tB .. ll(:.'"Z.. 8i.iltfins Permit Number CA lip Code P, Uo ~titcd by~ No.. NS..165 W'1d ~ b~ the City~ of ttle Cltyuf C-artwad. Oafikfflia,. the.City . $~ID kwya spea Tax in Ccmmurity FaQlifie$.di$h'ic.'t No. 1. An non-ruttentill property, 14pan ihe ~dthefimt~ pemft. shall ha\te1he optia,\ to (1) f*YtM SPECfAL DEVa.OPMENTTAX ONE- 'JlMEt1'{2)-.ne :t,e~3F'EC::W.. TAX-f>l:.VaOF-'ED PROPER't'Yfara perit,ad nat to~ twenty- frle (25) ~ Pl.-e indicate your~ b1 iri'ffaling the approrm* Jinlll tM,dow: · · OPTION {2): 1 et~~~PECIAL DEVELDPMSNT'TAX ANNUAIJ,.Y for a period not to~ twen yeas. MlmmumAnnwJSpe<:iatT~$; k,~ 94:Z , _ . 0M'ler mi1mb; . t 00 HERt8Y CW'-t'TIFY UN ER PENALlY OF PERJURY THATll'tf UNOER~ te THE PROPER1'V OWNeR Of THE SU~ MOPER"f'V AND "ll.iAT t UNDERSTAND ANO WtLL COMPLY WilH 1111; PROVISIONS AS ST'Aiel) ABOVE. ' . -· lha City cf cartsbad ha, not independently V'erified the infmnatio.n shown above. Therefare. we accept no ~~ asi to1he ~ « CQmpl~s or 1:!'lis informatian. NON~RESIOENTIAL CERT4FICATE · "2. g I t.S'1 y,. 2· "1-1-5A "JII p_ 7 " . t 8-26-1999 2:47PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 flUG-26-99 THU 06:49 - oif··Clf",,f. -.il,._---.·t{p. ~ .. ,.;···' "y .,-LI : , •.o;: •... · ..• ··,· .=· ,, _.... ·'-fl;p· ~--·. 1-/00~- P. 04 City of Carlsbad l;.i!flliGt·M•lY!EddiiWJ CEBIIFJ'6IE QF COMPUAN;,t; PAYMgNT OF §_CHOOLfEES 0,8 OTJjf;R MITJGADON Tt,is form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the apptopriat~ school districts and returned to the City prior to l.s$uing a building permit. Th8 City wm not iru;ua any culldlng permit wfmout a completed school fee form. Project Name: . · l-\ _--Lot B P.5 Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address; 'li-3. \.f.. \' ?.e ·f4~~~ lP A 1 D SEP ~ 9 1999 1 D l j 4 3~ A.P.N.; Project Applicant (Owner(~). Narne(s)) Project Description; Building Type: Residenti;al Number of New Dwelling Uni~ .. -. ,, Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelfing Unit Square Feet of Living Area in sou· Res. Additions: Comerc./ Ind.: City Certification of Applicant's information: Carlsbad Unified &:hQOI Oistrid 801 Pine-A'Ye. Carisl:>aa CA 9~009 (729--9291) Encinitas Ul'lion Sehoot Oi$triet 101 South Rii;1n:clt Sar1(a Fe Rd Enciolt~s. CA 9'-0'-4 (944-4300) --------·· ····---·---------· Net Square Feet New Area Square Feet Floor Area µ, "2-S:-~ ···· ·· ··· .......... 5:-at_e_: ------ -------------~-------~---- SC110QL DISTRICTS WITHIN TRI: CITY' OE CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified $cnool District 215M3!$ W;;y San Maroos. CA 92069 Q'36::2.2.00) San Oieguito Union High School District 71 O Endnttas 81\ld. · Encinitas, ·CA 92024 (75$~4'-=-9"'"',)_. ------~ Certifk:ation of Applicant /Owne-rs. The person executing this dec1arauon ('"OWne() certifies under penalty of p1;1rjury mat (1) the information i:;,rovided abQve is cottect. end we t0 the best of tt,e Ownet's knowledge, tmd that ttie owner wiU· fil~ Al'l amP.nC!lll<l certification of payrnent and pay !:he additional fee if Owner requests ~n inct"P..a~e in 'the number of awemng units or square foota9e after tlie bullding permif i.~ issued or Jf the initial determination Qt' units or SQUare-footage is found to ~ inccrteet. Md tMt (2} the Owner is the owner/ deYetoper of 'the above descril>ed pro~(.s), or tl'lat the pernon executltig this declatation is :aut.ho~ed to $ign 01'1 berialf of the OWner. - _S_ig..._n_at_u_re_:,.;;;;W ...... ....,~=~..,~,-fzb:;.,;;. ~· ..... 1/.,._rl...,,g-,!,;,);:)_~ ______ , ______ ,,_Da_t_e._· _a .... /_P-l/_Qg_._ 2075 L.as Palma.$ Pr.• Carls.bad. CA 9200Sw'l.$7S • (7ij0) 4$8-1161 •· FAX {760) 438..0894· * Ae\lised a.1a.oo Ill . -·, 8-26-1999 2:48PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6197934787 AUG-28-99 THU 06 _: 49 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFlCA TtON (To be.completed byttle schooJ dlstriet(s)) P. 05 ••~••• .. .._..........,~-••••4Al1kttt•or.e!ta~'/nf2•••••••A4••••ri•*ritt ...... *;**"'*""*'* ...... •--••2~-~- THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQl,liREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE SEEN OR WILL ~E SATJSFleD .. SCHOOL DISTRICT: -_ The undsrsigned, being duly authorized by the appficable School District, oertlfies that the developer, builder, or owner has s~ti~ed the opligatlon for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant Usted on page 1 has _paid' all amounts 01 compteted other applicable school mitigation determined by the School Oismct. The CltY may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE Of AUTHOR1Z50 ~CHOOL J' . , J v'J O D • DISTRICT OFF!CfAL ~-f~ ' . . ,... . TITLE J. ff. Blair . Assistant Supt. NAME OF SCHOOL DCSTRlCT . Business_Services ! .. ' OATE PHONE NUMBER P_s City of Carlsbad Plumbi!J,g • Number of new or n:located fixrurc.s, traps. bt flcor drains? .' ¢ Yes _L No __ _ • New building sewer line? • Number of roof drains? -· 5 • Install/ahi;r wattr line? • :Nwnher of water heate?s? • Number of hose bibs? • Gas piping system - Yer:: 'x_.No ___ ~ -Install ~~-Repair • Number of new or relocated gas outlets " New water meter - E1earicai • Number of new panels or ~bpancls? Size of New Service ~;J,,ooo :e • Single Phase 0 Size..,.__ Number. of amperes • Three Phase ~ • Three Phase ~ 480 '¢. • Remodel (:relocate ex.isdns; outleis/&witche~ or ~dd outlets/swii;rn:;s Number of ~,mpi:;res ~ Number <_~f amperes 19~ Ye~ __ No X_ M~clumtcat • Number ·of furnaces, A/C. or heat pumps'! • Number of fireplaces? ·· .. Number .of exhaust fans? • · Number 9f exhaust p.oods? • Number of boilers or compressors'? • New or relocated dUt::( work1 Ot0L>J. /.A.IJDE':]2.. 1rt1S ~rr ~ N.o M..Sc..tt· Woft-K ·---- Number 0-f HP? .Yes ___ No __ _ BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE F'EE'D OUT THIS FORM NEIDS TO BE RE.TURNED TO TBE . BUILJllNG DEPARTMENT -FAX NUMBER (760)438.()894 ' ' IG ti> "1-lrf¼-MY lfV ~ Js<-[ ~r./J Slt~//L-TIL:r Uf> .I crl!J!J~ 7o ~~Jt1~ ?-~ ~~ . , ;a/i(cii<!-lJrL~d~ · <10¥Q~~ , ·'J,12),1crr / ~#:ZrW ~riv uuL · //~ ~ . o/v:s/¢2 ~ /1,+.-, · f ~-~ APPROVALS VP ~ Date / /~ t<i:/ C/ '6 ~ C,W\, -1 · -~ l[f BuUdlng j !Jf!f~;!:~;;_2;;:;ff ~ £Sb/L v C/7j -J/ii_~!":rmg1/~ A I . f, Oif/li l · f I ___ Coastal ,JP. t'j Jqq ~/Ml {;IN»" ~-,'d,kr ,nµ /<G( ' . . ;.. :::~ ~/J,//:'=='~~J1::'Jf1f/)._~t::=//1'ri~wt~~ /,,~ ~Gf°d ~/ F-:;;:; =,~.1.VcLid"!f=; (~)fu h::.~·ib. From----/I • -r;:-: ff A licant ncant . 1 (i 4t.:< z% 1 Jctt s'f p(('klg.,.; ===:t=== :::~~ I I . --:-::,.;-:;=¼----SCHOOLFEEFORM ~ 1 Gr If 9 -o{)Jµ<f/1-~ ~ ,( c :z~~tt==== ~i:=R -----1----BUSUC ~ ~ ,./ WCOMP . rlk 'I s; t~S \ cf D ~ . :>JJ r, =_ -==--+-===--==L._ ~:::s~RSPLANS ----·v)· tf/tr/i'?j i--;r,,~ MAT FORM f!,::?.\1:¥.if~ -·.-::, \ r-fl!f blflbRM ~/4:,,J f~ : FORM ·R i 02-10-2000 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: TRACEY SEAN STEC 8810 REHCO RD City of Carlsbad Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR99294 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1620 FARADAY AV CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 2121302300 $0.00 CB983162 Construction Type: NEW BLACKMORE LOT 98 STRUCTURAL REVISIONS Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: APPROVED 12/08/1999 MOP 02/10/2000 Inspect Area: .e,J) BLACKMORE SIGNAL HILL &~'r PO BOX424 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 Total Fees: $436.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $436.00 Plan Check Revision Fee $436.00 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have previously been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. l . ( µr 10 ~ s~r · Mr::£o~s 1 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. ____ _ EST. VAL. _________ _ Plan_Ck. Deposit ________ _ Validated By __________ _ Date. ______________ _ Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use. Description of Work SO. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms City State/Zip Telephone# N Address City State/Zip Telephone # ame ~ ... ~~~1?'?":1~~t; :,r.tr.-,~~i\o','l.'•~--·~~--'t'"'<">"'.."~.·:,,.u,• .... •,-............... , •.• ~.--,-.,_-;.&-M,..-.h"'li'.W~o•li.r°-~-;:!.~::n",~~~~>,2;'~_;..~~~~~'i.,1l,/(,>:\:l>';;i'-~·~'i;i,,,t<;t~~;.,:__;,;,.1,.;_,.,,,_-.,.-V,~'W\l".:l.-Pf"'~;l'-UA).*~r,MNfl~l;;l'!t!?a\t~!JS~'!:i~x.:-'-~~~ ..... .-... ~A-. _,i,:< °'---·~-· . "" ..... --~ ,._, M•" . ,,. .., -~ ,. , -• (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires II permit _to _construct, alter, improve, de~o_lish or repair any struc~ure,_ prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file II signed statement that he 1s licensed pursuant to the prov1s1ons of the Contract~r s License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Busi~ess ~nd Professio~s Code) o~ ~hat he Is exempt therefro~, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031,5 by any applicant for a permit sub1ects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # _________ _ License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ -~ ~~~~;~·~·:.~~l·,~-~'t, ,~tV,~-= •' Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. · O I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permrt is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company____________________ Policy No.,_____________ Expiration Date. _______ _ (THIS SECTION·NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS' FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) O CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so· as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: F11llur11 to secure workers' compensation coverage la unlawful, and shall subject en employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compen111tlon, damages 111 provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, lmerest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE:::;:::;:;::;;::;-:;;:;:::-';".';:;::;::::;::::;:===::::==========;;:;;:;;;:::;;;:;;:;:;::;;:.:;;:;::::::;:;;:;:::;;:-:: DATE ________ _ rt ~~i8~~i£imE~EC~~Tfd-~~~~~~~--~t:~~*~~~w.~~~~~~~rtmi;.~N,-;,~~:~f:~~J;rt~~!~~?;~!l~:-~~;~~~~':{._l,::·.-~ ~~'!~:.'l;-.f~}1:~ ,, ;-·,:·""~ -~,-: -· I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with conttactor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number):. ______________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _____________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _____________________ _ DATE _________ _ '.C0'11e1£t..e;,i'H1s~~o.~~-l:N.ONJ1lEsill~.t.'rtr@:Y-Ji8.Mfi~ii~~~~~~ii:~_ft:~~W¥."i!l:i'.s::J't:l:;f;:;;1'~;];~ 2:":f~.'::' ?'}'.:}1'.f:.i." :_:;_ :: :.·': Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration for~ or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Su~stance Account Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. J.';i'~~QY~t-ff(fCilQ"N~)1fG/~~c~1:W~";.~~~~1,:.~!.X-~~t~~'.ef.::i,f;:';;{!¥J1;ii}\'.\'.,':.';;z.,:,,::,;,:\ /;: ·;,. · I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ____________ _ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such·permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit ,s suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ________________________ _ DATE _____________ _ WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance 10/26/2000 TRACEY SEAN STEC 8810 REHCO RD SAN DIEGO CA92121 Re: Application Date: 12/08/1999 Plan Check #: PCR99294 Address: 1620 FARADAY AV Expiration Date: 12/07/2000 Permit Type: PCR Description: BLACKMORE LOT 98 STRUCTURAL REVISIONS You applied to have your plans checked on the date noted above. To date, the related building permit has not been obtained. The original plan review application will expire as no building permit has been issued. Plans submitted and not retrieved from the building department prior to the plan check expiration date noted above will be destroyed. The provisions of sections 304 (d) of the Uniform Building Code state: "Section 304 9d) Expiration of Plan Review Applications for which no permit is issued within one year following the date of application shall -expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee." In order to provide better service, please indicate your handling choice for the plans originally submitted and return this letter to the Building Department. __ Project Abandoned -I will pick up plans within 10 days __ Project Abandoned -Plans may be destroyed. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (760) 602-2718. Raenette Abbey Building Department EsGil Corporation 2n Partnersliip witli (jovernment for 'Buifaing Safety DATE: JAN.25,2000 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 (REV. # 1) PCR99-294 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: THE BLACKMORE COMPANY SET: II ~NT ~· D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. cg] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SEAN TRACEY 8810 REHCO RD., SUITE C, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 C8J Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person cg] REMARKS: # 1 ): Please submit 3-sets of revised/ signed plans to the city for review. #2): The revised architectural and structural plans as submitted do not match. Please resubmit consistent plans. • FLOOR PLAN & STRUCTURAL REVISIONS UNDER THIS PLAN CHANGE. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 1/20 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation 1.n_ f artnersliip witli (jovernment for 'Buifaing Safety DATE: DEC. 16, 1999 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD PLAN CHEC~ NO.: 98-3162 (REV. # 1) PCR99-294 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY PROJECT NAME: THE BLACKMORE COMPANY SET:I D ,,.-Ae.e.LM2ANT ~) D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: SEAN TRACEY 8810 REHCO RD., SUITE C, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: Please submit 3-sets of revised/ signed floor plans matching the revised structural plans to the city for review. FLOOR PLAN & STRUCTURAL REVISIONS UNDER THIS PLAN CHANGE. By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/9 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 CARLSBAD 98-3162 (REV.# 1) PCR99-294 DEC. 16, 1999 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD 1) PCR99-294 PREPARED BY: Ali Sadre BUILDING ADDRESS: 1620 FARADAY BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B BUILDING PORTION DI Ill 1""111\11"" /\DC/\ --·--,,_ tfh~1 FLOOR PLAN & 4 HOURS STRUCTURAL REV. Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-3162 (REV. # DATE: DEC. 16, 1999 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN VALUATION I VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 87.15/HR. 348.60 EsGil FEE D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 USC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 435.75 c1rYFEE Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only IZ! Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ SEE ABOVE Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 I SEE MORE REVISIONS SCANNED SEPARATELY