Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1675 FARADAY AVE; ; CB062605; Permit
City of Carlsbad 11-14.,,2006 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB062605 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: Applicant: 1675 FARADAY AV CBAD Tl Sub Type: IN DUST Lot#: 0 2121305200 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: MODERN POSTCARD-ADD NEW PRINT! PRESS Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Plan Check#: ISSUED 09/13/2006 RMA 10/31/2006 10/31/2006 RB GARY L. BARTON CORPORATION HOFFMAN STEPHEN LIVING TRUST 01-12-05 4700 LONG BEACH BLVD. 90805 562-984-9824 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $280.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1494 S COAST HIGHWAY 101 ENCINITAS CA 92024 . Meter Size Add'I Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFO Payoff Fee PFF (3105540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (3104193) License Tax (4304193) Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Redev Parking Fee Additional Fees HMP Fee TOTAL PERMIT FEES Total Fees: $366.00 Total Payments To Date: $366.00 Balance Due: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ?? $366.00 $0.00 BUILDING PLANS -k-lN'-~'FQR,WE :Sl4.Kll\a..D _ATTACHED Inspector: FINAL PJ!Bf;?VAL Date: ~c:1';? Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which ou have reviousl been iven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statu e of limitations has reviousl otherwise ex ired. r; ! PERMIT APPLICATION Cll~Y OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Assessor's Parcel # , \ \ IA t<r.4::fJ, A}~!M Existing Use #of Stories Name City '5, ""' :qONT1iMt9~-: ·coMPANY.N1\llliE' :~!~!~amazJt;;- EST. VAL. ---------.._.,.. Plan Ck. Deposit --------4-it..,t;~ Validated By_....p,,__,,-,........,,.-+-....+---"#-- Date. ____ __,,_H...,.:,1-+-4,ofi~---- Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Proposed Use # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms S.tate/Zip Telephone# (Sec. 703.1.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged e~a_1ny "Ctioiste~~5 b ny app~o-n~it&f~eJts c;wzi~;ivif<Lalty~m9~a!e 1tzd ,;:tqtz <f Address City State/Zip Teleph City State/Zip Telephone .6 .... W9ij!{EltS; COMPEN,S:A'l'lori( . . . .... ,: • • , ,'n Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: W' I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance '~e work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company ~ f2''f~ PolicyNotf.4-/&rqO"J -Of Expiration Date f C) -cl J -O<p (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100) OR LESS) 0 to become subject to the I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as mpensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to cboil""We,Jjei:&.;1':Ql!!pensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($1 ,0 e cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. DATE CJ1 -/ ';-0 $c, . ,,, , "' :. ; ', ,' , h , • M, ·-~ the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 operty my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and sions Code: The Ccintractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he-did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address I phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ address / phone number / type of work):. ________________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _____________________ _ DATE _________ _ '~0Me1;_1;t1fr1:11~ SE9TIQ{:JF_Of!'.N(!NfJiESIDENTIAL BUILDING f'ERl\1f1T~ ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials ~~stration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 7'-. YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? ~ YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? . 0 YES ~ NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ~8~=-~¢QrJ$JRVPfiQi{t~,P.tN~ ~(f~N~V ff'~ ,:, ,,_, , , v,N =-- I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). IA ,~A? LENDER'S NAME _ _,V<.....::.V_,1~.,_,__.,._=--------LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ ;1;1; .. APePCAT'f[;.Cl,:R,TlflCATl9N '. . ,. . , ... ,,, __ .. .. ·~ ........... . I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit\' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for exca ·ans over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by t ui · g O ·cial under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comm ced o days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comm ced for 80 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). DATE Z, 9 -/ S -0/;. YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/07/2007 Permit# CB062605 Title: MODERN POSTCARD-ADD NEW PRINTI Description: PRESS Type:TI Job Address: Suite: Location: Sub Type: INDUST 1675 FARADAY AV Lot: 0 APPLICANT GARY L. BARTON CORPORATION Owner: HOFFMAN STEPHEN LIVING TRUST 01-12-05 Remarks: or 500-8136 Total Time: CD Description Act Comments 1n·spector Assignment: RB --- Phone: 7604317084 Inspector: ----- Requested By: KEN LAFRANNO Entered By: CHRISTINE 19 Final Structural 39 Final Electrical 1------- Date 04/24/2007 11/15/2006 11/15/2006 11/15/2006 11/13/2006 Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# lns12ection Histo[Y Description 89 Final Combo 11 Fig/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 11 Fig/Foundation/Piers Act NR AP AP AP PA lnsp Comments RB NO ONE W/PLNS & PERMIT -CALLED KEN & LEFT MESSAGE RB OK TO COMPLETE SLAB POUR RB RB RB OK UP TO 2 FT SEE BACK OF CARD • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad California 92008 INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTION RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED PtANS MUST BE KE;PT ON THE JOB CALL PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. FOR NEXT WORK DAY BNSPECTUON BUILDING iNSPECTION: (760) 602-2725 CB062605 1675 FARADAY AV JOB ADDRESS:_ MODERN POSTCARD-ADD NEW .PRINTI PRESS ______ LOT NO./SUITE: ______ _ OWNERS NAME: _ Tl USE/OCCUPANCY Lot#: INDUST GARY L. BARTON CORPORATION :fYPE CONST. DATE (0 (3t {Q-E; rLl'\.IVII f I~'-'• CONTRACTOR BUILDING OTHER APPROVED TO COVER Type of Inspection Date Inspector Notes BUILDING " .,, FOUNDATION //. IS 'I? ~ ,r)ff ~ I""~ .I& I:.-L__.,,,_, - REINFORCED STEEL ·:.------~J ~-·,; #'~~~ ., --~ _./4,, £, MASONRY , ' DGROUT D WALL DRAINS TILT PANELS POUR STRIPS COLUMN FOOTINGS SUBFRAME D FLOOR D CEILING ROOF SHEATHING EXT. SHEAR PANELS FRAME INSULATION EXTERIOR LATH INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL FINAL .v/{Dll, '•q4 '. PLUMBiNc-u \ \.,j)' D SEWER AND BUCO g_pl:fCO UNDERGROUND ~ASTE DWATER I//, If-~;c.. • h IT ~11 TOP OUT D WASTE D WATER TUB AND SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D GAS PIPING D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER FINAL _,,. _/' ELECTRICAL .l!l" ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND DUFER t,. rr-,,,-~ ~ r-.. -~ .rr-. h-J ROUGH ELECTRIC WALLS -~ V ROUGH ELECTRIC CEILING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D TEMPORARY D BONDING DPOOL FINAL --1"1 MECHANICAL ~rr-i"'\DJ \Vt UNDERGROUND DUCTS & PIPING \~~u \JI D DUCT & PLEM. D REF. PIPING HEAT -AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS FINAL CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED FINAL Sign When Appropriate Building Dept. (Inspections} (760) 602-2725 Fire Department (760) 602-4660 Planning Department (760) 602-4602 Engineering Dept. (Inspections) (760) 438-3891 Building Inspectors (7am-4pm) (760} 602-2700 CMWD (760) 438-2722 Ext 7151 - REV 3/2006 SEE BACK FOR SPECIAL NOTES - ' ' ~ ' ·\ ,;;-'1\.,-t\ ..... ¾-. : --,---,,-----::;---7':',---,--'--------,-----,----,.,......,c'-'--'----'--'---'--r-+'----:-'--'--------,-----'--~---'-----""'""""-'----..,,_.,.~__.-j Typeof lnsp~ction . :Date, Inspector Notes ! --'---------:--'----'------:-------'-.--"-'----+-------+,---'-----"-,--,-------'-----,-"',----'-"-,-.,.,,.-,-! FIRE , -c--'---,-,---,------.--------''-,-----'--,......,,-,-¼----,-'---.:......,--+-,-----,-+---~----'----------'--'----"---'-----'--! NS yNDERGROU.ND -~ 4 ==M,:s:.f?:Y:ER=H=E=A=o=· ====================================================================··=·. ::::· J NS:F!NAL '1 =-=A:lJT=?==~X=T.=.IN=G=U=l=SH=l=N=G=S=Y=ST=f=M=· ==============================================================:.:1 -MEDICAL GAS J --,------~-----'-----'------------,--i-~--,.......-+,--------+----"...;.a-'-,"-'---"----"----"--'-'---'-,--'-'---'--,-------l ALARM SYSTEM j ,[ . l ' . . . ) . . ·. · Section ·5411~~ . ~e~ith ao:Dd: :Saf~ty· C9d~, State pf Caiifomiij· .· . . . . , , ·; ' : . . ' ~ . ' ' ' . . . . ' ' . ' !j ; ·(a} ,There shall be not Tess. than one water d0set for eath.2O employees. orJractional part thereof working aL;1, j construction job site. The water closet shaH consist of a .patented chemi·cal type· toilet · · . . .. ,: . . -. . I i (b) 'Fbl' the pu~pose of this. section .th¢ term construction site ~hall mean the location on which actual. l tor,i~tructioh. of a builc:Hng,Ts in progres~:. . · 1 I ,-'i ·l ,,, i .' i ·i All ~onstrttction or work for which a:pef.mit is req.uired shall be ~ubject to ·fnspedion and all s:uch cons~ructior-i l or ·work shall remain accessible-and exp6sed foi-insp~ction .purposes unti'I approved by the.H1spector. ·Work.'. :shall ,not be-done -beyonff the point :indi'cated in· each successive insp~ction yvifhodt first 6btainiAg the app~qva;L; . of the inspector. · ADD'll~ONAt NO.TES . -i i ----'---'----~----'----'---:-'--,------'-,------~--;----------~-------~----'-----'-i i .. ! 1 1.· -----'--'-----------~~~-'---""---',--~--'-.."'---'-----'-:....:,;.,..-"'---'-'---''----"--'----'-'---'---'---'-"---..:....c.._-'--'--~---',-'-'---',-'---'' l ,. ·.1 ~ ' I I ! t' ' --+-~~~~--'---':---,---'--'--',,--'---',---'--'---,--"---'---------~---"-'--"---'------,-.,_ •. --,--.. ----,--'-'--I i ·,., , . , u "·~...,_~/t,-,~ ,. r _i -~ '.. ; -,-; ':: ~-:·~ --~-·.~. , ·-.--,-,--,,'"---·-:--_ -· --~~-~-~-,,::::.l-=----~-·....:·-~--~-~ ---.... -, ~ . -=-~~:~. :I;~~ ( ,_ I . . ·. I l -'------=-'-'-'---'--'-----~~~____.,.~---------'-'-,--~----,-,----,-----'--,--.......;--;-~-,---,---,-.,.,----· .f .· . l t --.~-,------,-'---"--,---,.,-----,--...,,,.,--~~-----'-~-~-~------'~--,--'-----,.'---,-.-'---,,,,..,,.-,-~'-,-,---~ ' 1 • I ., ,. i --,------------'-,-,..,---~~-~------,----,----,----~~----"---,-.--"---,-,-':-----,-~---",---,---~'-t ,· f. --~-----~---'----------,,-,---,,..,--,--.,,,;--""=--'-'--,--'-..C-..,'--~-'-'-,----'---,--------'-,-C~'-'-+--'-.,......-'--~· . ; ·. Apollo Inspection Service, Inc. 1914 S. Pacific Coast Highway Ste.208 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Ofc. 310-316-0019 Fax 310-316-0047 Special l~spector Daily Report Permit# /" . ._ Ll U v J...,, v O.::) roject. _____________ _ Owner/ Ct)f'\. ~ r-i>-.c _l ...,_, '?-. . \ \U'\..::-; .\-~~~ Contractor____________ Architect._. ___________ _ G·\»,Q:J ~~5°'1._\--e,2) ubcontractor ___________ _ Description of work observed '-.. "-. C),~ .)5,.-,. '\ ,_ ... ' ·.; ., . .- . 1)_ \-~' D~ ~~u~ ~ r °)5 \}.) R. , _..z_ \JO v, St..-<\_ \ 0 ~ ~ '-'\ \rJ~s <y SL~ ~\.. ~~5 ' .._;;;;' , . ~ \ , \ S ~'.'\: O Y ~ Cr, -r-.. c 1--XL. ~g,,G L ~ \...: ..... r)_ e r-\' .' L 1 ~ ; e.. ~ \~J I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the above portions of work that were observed by me were in compliance with approved plan·s and spec;ifications. · ln;p€clor (Print)\'l>,.,.,-.,...: J ~ f'C Lie. N5\'I \ ·"" ,., _y Cf'gency._-~ • -~ ,, \ V \ \ ~ '-. i'Sianedf\: ~ \~~~ Date \ \ \ \ <"\ I ,.,, 1 Inspections are based' on a 4 ·hour minimum. After 4 hrs. is 8 hrs. Over 8 an'd $atf.m:i'ays a}e 'tifn\#and one half. ,. Bill To: -' Hours __ Reg_O.T. Cyls. Type Sun't. Sian ' ,. ·Apollo lnsjJection Service, Inc. 1914 S. Pacific Coast Highway Ste.208 Redondo Beach, CA 90?77 Ofc. 319-316-0019 Fax 310-316-0047 -Spe<;ial Inspector Daily Report Permit# .. Prl)ject -<: '::, S5 (.)v& . . · \v 1'\':), \:~r~ \>---~ \ , C~,~ ~~-d...... : Own~r -S:"i'.·,s ~'{~\)~_ . .. . ' Contractor ~~\-~~ _,C..o,~. Architect 01~ ' -:i I • -, .. ,. ,. : ' Subcontractor . . .. Sngineer ~ ~q a},·.S ,).,._!':-~-~--i;,: .. 4r., 'i:.\r\. I) • t. ,_ . ' Description of work observed (.)00 \ \ •:., !/-c_o..,. ~ o\, ~ ~~\ c f\ D'-:-\.\::; OG r. <s -r_ Co v-. '-c ~ l--<L '°f'~'i--.,, . -~ ... ,,.,,~ .... , ' /> '•, I hereby certify that, to the ~st of my knowleqge, the above portions of work that were observed:by me were in compliance with approved plans and specifications. · · lospector(Print) \ t-..,c~~<,,.K . I\:'\ _,,,_,"T'<'l.n""-" \~ . , Si ned . \ _ ·_. . Lie. No. 5\ l.\!;,1 o-L\ '"¼gency ~ <--c;_. Date \ \----_\ \p -oL, Inspections are based on a 4 hour minim_um. After 4 hrs. is 8 hrs.,Pver.aand S~tµJdays are time and one h~lt. __ Type. _____ _ • !• \ \ .... ~ _;., • ~ ""-~~ ii ' ' •• ,-.r-'• it,,,,' __ h __ .;·~ ... / ...... -••• .:.-•• -·.1.·r;:t.::.1-·. ·~ : . --· EsGil Corporation In (J?artnersliip witli government for CJ3ui[aing Safety DATE: October 23, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 062605 SET: II D APPLICANT D JURIS. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: Printing Press Foundation for IRIS Group D [:g] D _o - D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where ne9essary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ,.-' The check listtransmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. ~-JC <-The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [:g] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [:g} REMARKS: PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER OF WORK SHOW THE REQUESTED NOTE TO HAVE THE PROJECT COMPLY WITH THE 2001 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. By: Bert Domingo Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 10/16/06 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In <Partnersnip witn (}overnment for <Bui{aing Safety DATE: September 26, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 062605 SET:I PPLICANT URIS. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: Printing Press Foundation for IRIS Group D D D D D ~ D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Gary Barton 4700 Long Beach Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90805 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted~: a ~f-AvtuU Telephone#: (562) 984-9824 Date contacted: [~ (by: vi/) Fax #: 5994 MailA.phone Fax /4 Person REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 9/14/06 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 062605 S~ptember 26, 2006 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 062605 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Avenue FLOOR AREA: REMARKS: Structural only DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: September 26, 2006 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): STORIES: HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/14/06 PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24 ), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC. The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 062605 September 26, 2006 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. • PLANS 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building. 4. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER REQUIRED? REMARKS 5. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Carlsbad 062605 September 26, 2006 • FOUNDATION 6. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. THIS WILL BE CHECKED INCLUDING THE ITEMS BELOW WHEN THE STRUCTURAL COMMENTS ARE SATISFIED. 7. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 8. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section 106.3.3. 9. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 10. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans (when required by the soil report). 11. Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recommendations for foundation slab and building pad preparation. 12. If the soils engineer would recommend that he/she review the foundation excavations, please note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." • STRUCTURAL 13. The calculations show foundation pits for the printing press but the sheet S2 of the plans seems to show a step foundation section heavier in the structural make up than what was recommended in the calculations. 14. Page 2 of the calculations show a pit design but seems not identified on the plans. 15. Page 4 of the calculations shows a retaining wall but seems not shown/identified on the plans. Carlsbad 062605 September 26, 2006 16. Page 5 of the calculations shows 2465 # dead load but the page 2 of the same calculations shows differently with the weight of the printing press 108302 #. Please clarify. Please show how the 1231 PLF was derived. 17. The same page 5 of the calculations recommended 12" concrete but none seems shown on the structural plans. 18. Any required anchoring for the printing press? 19. A complete plan check will be made. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 062605 S~ptember 26, 2006 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 062605 PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo DATE: September 26, 2006 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Repetitive Fee GRepeats * Based on hourly rate Comments: D AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. By Ordinance ... , Complete Review D Structural Only D Other 0 Hourly 2.751 Hours* Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $330.ool $264.001 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc P~ANNING/INGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER Cl 6 6-. Zk?D6. ' DATI °t ./(-4{./lfle r t . ADDRESS l bl b 1r66 ~ tt:f .e___ ~ . . DSIIJINTIAL RESlalNTIAL ADDfflON MINOR , < s10,aoo.ao1 . OTHER~*~~\ ' CMLSMD COMPANY STORII~ VILIAG• FAIRI COMPLna OPFICa BUILDING DATI :J/r7!6e FOUNDATION PAD FOR PRINTING PRESS (KOMORILS-440SP) SEISMIC DATA: SOIL PROFILE TYPE: SEISMIC SOURCE TYPE: DISTANCE TO SOURCE: SEISMIC FACTORS: SOIL DATA: CLASS OF MATERIALS: ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE: PRESS DATA: PRESS WEIGHT: (main unit) FOOTPRINT LENGTH: FOOTPRINT WIDTH: PIT SLAB THICKNESS: (PAGE 0-36 OF "MAPS OF KNOWN ACTIVE FAULT") SD B = 10 km (2001 CBC-TABLE 18-1-A) ITEM 5 (Clay, sandy clay, silty clay or clayley silt) P := 1000-psf W := 114460-lb L := 20-ft D := 5-ft T := 24-in w SOIL PRESSURE UNDER PAD: p:= ----- (L + 2·T)·(D + 2-T) . ,, " 5"3' 'O 'f < , I'iZ'; ·, . . j:)S_ '. P = l000psf EXIST. SLAB PRINTING PRESS WEIGHT = 114,460 lbs ... ' .4 . 4 I 4. ',:} . , • , 'C '1 <1 , -· . . I . <1 • • " .. ·• • · ". · • a . . .. . :3 . <l J 4 . ' . ' " . ". . ~ . I . . : .. . . <l .. '" . . . , . c . . . . 1c a· . " . c ~ ·. ~- --'€ -_:_·_ ---;·.-:--.. r -.-'--:-_:_ -~ ---.. --:-:--: -····· ... .. " " " · .. ,1 1 ...... · '" . '" ......... 1 , .. "-~ .. --···''".;·4. ". ". ·"· ... >··-71. . 1 I _./ . . . . .q ,. . . .. " ,. . . " .. '···-..!, . '." ' .:.:.:--;/ ": . ~ ' ..... 4 . . .. : 4.. ····,, .. ,:.~ . " l g' 16'-4" 4,i c a 4 .. a a<i " Project IRIS GROUP/MODERN POSTCARD Date O.K. 10" n a .. r---N " .. .. a l /J SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES Structural Design and Analysis 1675 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad Oct 2006 By~ age No. MJ Huszcz, S.E. 1 of 1 STRUCTURAL· CALCULATIONS FOUNDATION PITS FOR PRINTING . PRESSES OWNER: IRIS GROUP/MODERN POSTCARD 1675 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES Project IRIS GROUP/MODERN POSTCARD Date By /0.JYJJB s 10 . d A 1 . 1675 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad Sep 2006 'v' .,,,.,,, tructura es1gn an na ys1s Client Job No. Page No. MJ Huszcz, S.E. (949) 551-3316 ~ary L. Barton Corporation A PRINTING PRESS LOAD (KOMORILS540C) • PRESS WEIGHT: PRESS LENGTH: PRESS UNIFORM LOAD ON PIT: ) I P := 108302-lb L := 44-ft p W·--.-2·L W = 1231 plf (SEE PIT DESIGN ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES) PRINTING PRESS 108302 LBS 1231 PLF 1231 PLF ., . ·. • '·· . ., · .. .____ ·• d . ··• . · .. I~ : . . 4 ., • .. ·•. .. : 4,' 'If •• : ,-----J . •, ... ~ { EXISTING SLAB \ I .,_. .·. I .... '4 . . \' ~ f'- ·; ·: :· :.1 ""--PRESS PIT . .,· . . . .. . . .... : 4 .. •, . ·"'· .. • ·4 · •.. ~ . 4:. .• i4 • . . . .. · .. ' .. . 4 ' . ., .. ' : . 4 .,· .. -~ '. . ... SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES Project:oz.,s ~O~f Mo~-fl./\1 fo:,rCIM-j) Date By SE:{)2006 /'d..JJ§JfJ Structural Design and Analysis ' V ' "" Client Job No. Page No. MJ Huszcz1 S.E. (949) 551·3316 Gary L. Barton Corporation 2 of 7 WALL LOADING & REACTfONS ,. ... DL= 2462., LL= 0.#, Ecc= 27.in Sli ing Restraint 375.# 562.93psf 850.53psf SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES Project :t.Jti S Structural Design and Analysis -o-.tV' M ol)c({,J . Cl'r Cflil.S> Date By /'iJl§JB ,S6P2006 'VI// Client Job No. Page No. MJ Huszcz, S.E. (949) 551-3316 Gary L. Barton Corporation 3 of 7 WALL GEOMETRY & MAIN. REBARS SI ding Restraint #5@12.in @Toe --- Designer select 12.ln Cone wt #5 @ 12.ln o/c .. . . 4'-0" -l!'.· . ...-13/4" .. 2" •· • ··"-------'-----·-__ .. 3 " 1'-0" _: tJ _________ , ___ _ 4'-6" j'-0" #5@12.in all horlz. reinf. i....::::,----------1~--~-~~ @ Heel See Appendix A 5'-6" ' 4'-0" SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES ProJect Ili.s fril.-OVI/Mo~ef.-1,) fo:,,~.~~ ~ 2006 By ~ Structural Design and Analysis Client Job No. Page No. MJ Huszcz, S.E. (949) 551-3316 Gary L. Barton Corporation 4 of 7 _______________ _,__ _____ ,. .,. Spectrum Engineering Services 8 Cornwallis Irvine, CA 92620-2719 Phone & Fax (949) 551-3316 Title : 540 Press Job# : Dsgnr: MJH Description .... 48" Deep Press Pit page: __ Date:~&' Jf ,2006 This Wall In File: C:\RP61\PRESS540.RP5.RP5 Retain Pro 6.1f, 01-October-2004, (c)1989-2004 Registration#: RP-1113035 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Code: 1997 U BC ; Criteria Retained Height = 4.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Water height over heel = 0.0 fl Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 1,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 30.0 psf/ft Toe Active Pressure = 30.0 psf/ft Passive Pressure = 350.0 psf/ft Soil Density = 110.00 pcf FootingJJSoil Friction = 0.400 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Footing Dimensions & Strengths I Toe Width = 4 50 ft Heel Width = 1 00 Total Footing Width = 5.50 Footing Thickness = 12 00 in Key Width = 0 00 1n Key Depth = 0 00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0 00 fl re = 4,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Footing Concrete Density 150.00 pcf Min.As¾ = 0.0018 Cover@ Top = 2.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in I 7 S~u.r.c.ha_r_g_e_L_o_a.ds _____ __.J [ Lateral Load Applied to Stem Surcharge Over Heel = 0.0 psf ' [Adjacent Footing Load ··········--, NOT Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 psf NOT Used for Sliding & Overturning Axial Load Applied to Stem I Axial Dead Load Axial Live Load = = 2,462.0 lbs 0.0 lbs 27.0 in Axial Load Eccentricity = '. Design Summary ·--, Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 19.26 OK Slab Resists All Sliding ! Total Bearing Load = 3,887 lbs ... resultant ecc. = 2.24 in Soil Pressure@ Toe = 563 psf OK Soil Pressure@ Heel = 851 psf OK Allowable = 1,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored@ Toe = 676 psf ACI Factored@ Heel = 1,021 psf Footing Shear@ Toe = 22.8 psi OK Footing Shear@ Heel = 0.0 psi OK Allowable = 114.0 psi Sliding Cales Slab Resists All Sliding ! Lateral Sliding Force = 375.0 lbs less 100% Passive Force= • 175.0 lbs less 100% Friction Force = 1,554.8 Added Force Req'd = 0.0 lbs OK ... .for 1.5 : 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK ---~-' --..... -· .. ·-------··-· ... _ Footing Design Results •• -12L ___tlfil_ Factored Pressure = 676 1,021 psf Mu': Upward = 7,793 0 ft-# Mu' : Downward = 1,823 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 5,970 0 ft-# Actual 1-Way Shear = 22.84 0.00 psi Allow 1-Way Shear = 114.04 0.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = # 5@ 12.00 in Heel Reinforcing = # 5@ 12.00 in Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Lateral Load = 0.0 #/ft Adjacent Footing Load ... Height to Toi: = 0.00 ft Footing Width ... Height to Bottom = 0.00 ft Eccentricity Wall to Ftg CL Dist Footing Type Base Above/Below Soil at Back of Wall r.·.s.t.em_c_o.n.s.tr•u•c•t•io•n __ _.·1. To~t~~~K ............ .. Design height .ft= 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" Thickness Rebar Size Rebar Spacing Rebar Placed at = = = = -. Concrete 12.00 # 5 12.00 Edge Design Data ------------·· -· .... --.............. ------ fb/FB + fa/Fa = 0.514 Total Force@ Section lbs= 384.0 Moment....Actual ft-#= 7,159.4 Moment ..... Allowable = 13,928.1 Shear ..... Actual psi= 3.1 Shear ..... Allowable psi= 114.0 Lap Splice if Above in= 29.07 Lap Splice if Below in= 7.83 Wall Weight = 150.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 1 o. 19 Masonry Data ------·· -·------..... -......... ------• ---- rm . psi= Fs psi= Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Modular Ratio 'n' = Short Term Factor = Equiv. Solid Thick. = Masonry Block Type = Normal Weight Concrete Data -----............... ------------- re psi= 4,500.0 Fy psi= 60,000.0 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings = 0.0 lbs 0.00 ft = 0 00 1n = 0.00 ft Line Load = 0.0 ft Toe: #4@ 11.50 in, #5@ 17.75 in, #6@25.25 in, #7@34.50 in, #8@45.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Key: No key defined Spectrum Engineering Services 8 Cornwallis Irvine, CA 92620-2719 Phone & Fax (949) 551-3316 Title : 540 Press Job# : Dsgnr: MJH Description .... 48" Deep Press Pit Page. __ Dale:5g;, it ,2006 This Wall In FIie: C:\RP61\PRESS540.RP5.RP5 Retain Pro 6.1f, 01-October-2004, (c)1989-2004 Registration#: RP-1113035 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Code: 1997 U BC Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ..... OVERTURNING ..... · Force Distance Moment Item lbs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure Toe Active Pressure = 375.0 1.67 625.0 -Surcharge Over Toe Adjacent Footing Load , Added Lateral Load = = = • Load @ Stem Above Soil = Total = Resisting/Overturning Ratio 375.0 O.T.M. = = 19.26 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,887.0 lbs 625.0 Vertical component of active pressure NOT used for soil pressure ..... RESISTING ..... Force Distance lbs ft --------·-.. _,,_,__ . Soil Over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = 5.50 2,462.0 2.75 Stem Weight(s) = 600.0 5.00 2.75 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weigh! = 825_0 Key Weight = Vert. Component = Total = 3,887.0 lbs R.M.= Moment ft-# 6,770 5 3,000.0 2,268.8 12,039.3 I FOUNDATION PAD FOR P.RINTING PRESS (KOMORI LS 540 SP/CC) PRESS WEIGHT: W := 164660·lb . FOOTPRINT LENGTH: L := 33.S·ft FOOTPRINT WIDTH: D := ?·ft SOIL PRESSURE w p:=-p = 702psf < l000·psf O.K. UNDER PAD: L·D ' I SPECTRUM ENGINEERING SERVICES Project l:({ iF l}-/to'-'P J.H _o·T)etrJ posf. Date By~ Ser 2006 Structural Design and Analysis ,.. . . ' Client Job No. Page No. MJ Huszcz1 S.E. (949) S51-3316 Gary L. Barton Corporation 7 of 7 cti· Conformity Services March 02, 2007 Komori West Inc 1125 W. Victoria Street Compton, CA 90220 Attention: Mr. Jared Bradley Pacific Southwest Area Service Center 10606 Bloomfield Avenue Santa Fe Springs CA 90670 (562)-236-9555 (562)-777-8914 Subject: Equipment Labeling Evaluation, Final Report Printing Press eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Dear Mr. Bradley: Enclosed please find one copy of the subject report, as prepared by eti Conformity Services Compliance Engineer, Nicholas Durazo. The equipment evaluated in this report has been inspected for general compliance with applicable codes and standards and with regard to general electrical safety. Details of this evaluation are provided in this report. Please call us if you have any questions or if we can be of further service on this or other projects. Sincerely, eti Conformity Services Sam Daye Supervising Engineer C: Mr. Mike Peterson, City of Carlsbad, CA SPECTRUM f NG/NEERING SERVICES October 26, 2006 City of Carlsbad Building Department Structural Design and Analysis To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: PRINTING PRESS FOUNDATION FOR IRIS GROUP 1675 FARADAY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA The subject project design complies with 2001 Edition of California Building Code. Ct? 00 ?Joo) 8 CORNWALLIS• IRVINE, CA 92620-2719 • TELEPHONE & fAX (949) 551-3316 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cti· Conformity Se1Vices Pacific Southwest Area Service Center 10606 Bloomfield Avenue Santa Fe Springs CA 90670 (562)-236-9555 (562)-777-8914 EQUIPMENf FIELD EVALUATION FINAL REPORT Printing Press At Iris Group 1675 Faraday Ave CARLSBAD, CA CLIENT Komori West Inc 1125 W. Victoria Street Compton, CA, 90220 INSPECTION AUTHORITY City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mr. Mike Peterson, Building Inspector ETI Conformity Services, Inc. Reference No.: 8963053864F Submitted By: Nicholas Durazo Compliance Engineer Date: March 02, 2007 l--¾ Reviewed By: _________ _ Sam Daye Supervising Engineer I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents Page No. 1.0 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE ................................................................... 1 4.0 REFERENCED ELECTRICAL STANDARDS .................................................................... 2 5.0 EQUIPMENT INSPECTED ................................................................................................ 2 6.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES .......................................................................................... 3 7.0 EQUIPMENT EVALUATION .............................................................................................. 5 8.0 TESTING RESULTS AND INSTRUMENTS ...................................................................... 8 Appendices ............................................................................................................................ A-1 Appendix A ............................................................................................................................ A-1 Summary of Project Contacts ........................................................................................ A-1 Appendix 8 ............................................................................................................................ B-1 Field Evaluation Data Sheets ............................. : .......................................................... B-1 Appendix C ............................................................................................................................ C-1 Photos ........................................................................................................................... C-1 Appendix 0 ............................................................................................................................ D-1 Drawings ........................................................................................................................ D-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of these inspections and tests is to provide assurance that custom or non-certified equipment meets the requirements of the appropriate codes, safety orders and industry standards. These inspections and tests are normally required by the local building inspection authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) when equipment has not been certified by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) or other recognized testing agency. These inspections address only the electrical systems on the equipment listed in Section 5.0 of this report. 2.0 SUMMARY This project was initiated at the request of Mr. Jared Bradley with Komori West Inc. Final inspection and testing of the equipment referenced in Section 5.0 was performed at Iris Group in Carlsbad, CA by eti Conformity Services Compliance Engineer Nicholas Durazo from December 27, 2006 through February 28, 2007. Some electrical discrepancies were observed as described in Section 7.6. All discrepancies were corrected. Field measurements were taken by eti Conformity Services as detailed in Section 8.0. These measurements were within manufacturer's specifications. eti Conformity Services considers this equipment to be in compliance with electrical codes·and standards listed in Section 4.0, pursuant to the conditions of acceptance described in Section 3.0. An eti Conformity Services equipment label has been affixed to the equipment. Note that final approval is under the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad, CA. 3.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE In the event of modifications resulting in a change in the materials, manufacturing methods, loading, or environment that would affect the use of the accepted equipment under the provisions of the noted electrical standards, this acceptance will be considered automatically canceled. The applicant will be required to request re-examination of this equipment to determine acceptability of the modifications. By acceptance of the equipment referenced in Section 5.0, eti Conformity Services does not assume or discharge the responsibility of the equipment manufacturer, installer, or other relevant parties. Equipment evaluation is based upon adherence to sound engineering practices, and upon compliance with the specific sections quoted from the electrical standards referenced in Section 4.0 of this report. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Assessment of required interrupting rating and arc-flash labeling of the equipment being evaluated is beyond the scope of this field evaluation. Determining the adequacy of interrupting rating and arc-flash labeling are the responsibility of the end-user as described in subsection 6.5 of this report. This acceptance applies to the electrical circuits and components only, as referenced in this report. Unless noted otherwise, it specifically excludes examination for suitability of use for equipment involving toxic or corrosive gases, steam, and locations defined. as hazardous by the National Electrical Code (NEC®). 4.0 REFERENCED ELECTRICAL STANDARDS 4.1 ANSI/UL 508, Industrial Control Equipment 4.2 UL 508A, Industrial Control Panels 4.3 ANSI/NFPA 79, Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery 4.4 ANSI/NFPA 70, National Electrical Code (NEC) 4.5 UL 775, Graphic Arts Equipment, .3rd Edition, Feb. 1998 5.0 EQUIPMENT INSPECTED 5.1 One (1) Printing Press Manufacturer Name: Komori Model No.: LS440SP Serial No.: 125 Ratings: 220 Volts, 577 .83 Amperes, 3 Phase, 60 Hertz eti Conformity Services label: 0112096 eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F. Page2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES 6.1 Component Listing The following major power components are inspected for listing marks by an independent testing laboratory·acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ), or are evaluated to the appropriate nationally recognized consensus standard. Any discrepancies observed during the evaluation process are noted in Section 7.0. • Circuit breakers • Motors and drives • Fuses and fuseholders • Motor overload units • Disconnect switches • Wire ducts • Terminal blocks • Receptacles • Pushbuttons and switches • Cables and wiring • Relays and contactors • Disconnect switches • Transformers 6.2 Visual Inspection The equipment is visually inspected with particular attention to the following areas: • Manufacturer nameplates • Use of "approved" components • Proper overcurrent protection • Wiring ampacity • Ground bonding 6.3 Ground Bonding • Electrical ratings • Wiring methods • Guarding of live parts • Damaged components • General engineering practices Exposed non-current carrying parts of the equipment are inspected for effective grounding in accordance with the applicable provisions of the standards referenced in Section 4.0 and the National Electrical Code (NEC®) Article 250. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.4 Guarding of Live Parts All internal components are inspected for installation in a suitable enclosure and effective guarding in accordance with the standards referenced in Section 4.0 and the National Electrical Code (NEC®) Section 110.27. 6.5 Overcurrent Protection Overcurrent protection installed in this equipment is evaluated for compliance with the applicable codes and standards referenced in Section 4.0. Protective devices are verified to be properly identified, and of a type suitable for the circuit applications as installed. Please note: Determining the adequacy of interrupting rating and arc- flash labeling are the responsibility of the end-user and are therefore outside the scope of this field evaluation project. The customer is hereby advised of NFPA 70-2005, Articles 110.9 & 110.16 which state: 110.9 Interrupting Rating. "Equipment intended to interrupt current at fault levels shall have an interrupting rating · sufficient for the nominal circuit voltage and the current that is available at the line terminals to the equipment." "Equipment intended to interrupt current at other than fault levels shall have an interrupting rating at nominal circuit voltage sufficient for the current that must be interrupted." 110.16 Flash Protection. "Switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, meter socket enclosures, and motor control centers that are in other than dwelling occupancies and are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized shall be field marked to warn qualified persons of potential electric arc flash hazards. The marking shall be located so as to be clearly visible to qualified persons before examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment." eti Conformity Services would be happy to provide a proposal for above services upon receiving a request from the customer. 6.6 Internal Wiring Internal wiring and wiring methods are evaluated for compliance with the applicable codes and standards referenced in Section 4.0. Wiring is verified to be properly sized and rated, with a temperature rating suitable for the installed application. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. 7 Safety Interlocks and Operator Controls The equipment safety interlocks, emergency stops, operator controls and human machine interfaces (HMI) are verified to be properly identified. The safety features and emergency machine off (EMO) switches are tested for proper operation. 6.8 Field Testing Field testing was performed on the equipment, to meet the field testing requirements of the standards referenced in Section 4.0, unless production test results have been provided by the equipment manufacturer and accepted by eti Conformity Services. If no production tests are submitted, then testing is performed to verify the equipment to be operating within normally expected parameters as detailed in Section 8.0. 7.0 EQUIPMENT EVALUATION 7.1 One (1) Printing Press 7 .1.1 System Description The equipment inspected consists of one (1) printing press manufactured by Komori. The equipment is rated at 220 Volts, 577.83 Amperes, 3 Phase, 60 Hertz and is used to print large quantities of color prints. The equipment is installed indoors in an ordinary (non-hazardous) location, and has been evaluated for use in this location only. 7.1.2 Grounding Exposed non-current carryfng parts of the equipment were verified to be effectively grounded in accordance with the applicable provisions of NEC®, Article 250. 7 .1.3 Guarding of Live Parts All internal components are enclosed in a grounded, screw closed, metal enclosure, and are effectively guarded per NEC®, Section 110.27. 7.1.4 Overcurrent Protection Overcurrent protection was provided by a listed 600 Amperes Fuji circuit breaker. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7 .1.5 Wiring All wiring was found to be listed or recognized type MTW/THHN or equivalent. The incoming wiring is two (2) 500 kcmil conductors per phase, type MTW. 7 .1.6 Equipment Discrepancies The discrepancies observed during the evaluation of the equipment listed in Section 5.0 were as described below. These items require corrective action in order to successfully complete the final acceptance of the equipment. .01 Primary Overcurrent Protection Incorrectly Sized The 20 Amp circuit breaker installed as primary overcurrent protection for the 883 VA, 200: 19 V control power transformer marked "TR-M1" was oversized. Also, the 20 Amp circuit breaker installed as primary overcurrent protection for the 360 VA, 220:24 V control power transformer marked "TR-FAN1" in the delivery panel was oversized Action: Listed branch-circuit short-circuit protection shall be provided by fuses at no more than 300% of the primary current if it is less than 2 Amperes, 167% of the primary current if it is less than 9 Amperes, or 125% of the primary current if it is more than 9 Amperes. If secondary protection is installed, protection must be sized at no more than 250% of the primary current. Reference: UL 508, Paragraph 18.3 UL 508A, Paragraph 42.1.2, Table 42.1 NFPA 79, 7.2.7 NEC 450.3 Correction: The properly rated and listed protection has been installed for both transformers. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .02 .03 Exposed Hazard Insufficiently Guarded The plastic partition guarding the line side of the rriain circuit breaker is not high enough to prevent incidental contact with energized parts when the breaker is off. Action: The components shall be guarded against accidental contact by a suitable permanent partition that prevents persons from coming into accidental contact with any live parts. Reference: NFPA 79, 6.1, 6.2 NEC®, Section 110-27 Correction: The guard has been extended to prevent accidental contact. Motor Short-Circuit Protection Oversized The 75 Amp circuit breaker providing short-circuit and ground-fault protection for the 1.3 kilowatt, 5.9 Amperes side blower motor was oversized. Action: Listed branch-circuit short-circuit protection shall be provided by fuses at no more than 175% of the full-load current for time delay fuses, 300% for non-time delay fuses, or circuit breakers sized at no more than 250% of the full-load current for inverse trip breakers, 800% for instantaneous trip breakers, at the point where the motor branch-circuit receives its electrical supply. If the calculated values do not correspond to a standard rating, a higher rating that does not exceed the next higher rating shall be permitted. Reference: UL 508A, Paragraph 31.3.1 NFPA 79, 7.2.10 NEC®, Article 430 Part IX Correction: A listed 15 Amp circuit breaker was installed for the motor to protect it against short-circuit and ground-faults. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8.0 TESTING RESULTS AND INSTRUMENTS 8.1 Field Testing 8.1.1 Current and Voltage Measurements Current and voltage measurements were taken at the input to each piece of equipment listed in Section 5.0 under normal operating conditions. The measurements obtained were verified to be within the voltage and current ratings of the devices installed. Results: All tests were completed with satisfactory results. All measurements were found to be satisfactory and within an acceptable operating range. 8.1.2 Temperature Rise Test A temperature rise test was performed on all components within each piece of equipment listed in Section 5.0 under normal operating conditions. The test was performed using an infrared (1.R.) thermometer to verify the temperature rise for each component did not exceed those specified in UL 508. Temperatures obtained were verified to be sufficiently low enough not to constitute risk of fire nor to adversely affect any material employed in the equipment. The temperature rise obtained for each component is a result of test conditions only and is not necessarily indicative of the possible temperatures generated in the operating environment. Results: All tests were completed with satisfactory results. All temperatures recorded were less than the maximum acceptable temperature rise for each component. 8.1.3 Insulation Resistance Test An insulation resistance test was performed on the equipment listed in Section 5.0 to verify the dielectric integrity of the insulating medium. Voltage was applied phase to ground at 1000 Vdc for 1 minute on the incoming supply conductors of each piece of equipment tested. Results: All test results were completed with satisfactory results. Please see the Equipment Evaluation Data Sheet provided in Appendix B for additional information. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8.2 Test Equipment test Equipment Model.· Asset No. Calibration Date. . -. -.. -···--.. .. . Fluke, True RMS Multimeter 87V 20-2026 February 2006 Fluke AC Current Probe 80i-600A 20-354 PCNR Raytek Infrared Thermometer RAYST4PU 20-2028 February 2006 Biddle Megger BM400/2 20-01216 February 2006 PT Micrometer 50059 20-1853 February 2006 AC Hipot Tester 230425 20-1868 February 2006 Digital Caliper W80152 20-01843 February 2006 **PCNR = "Periodic Calibration Not Required" (Used for measurement and test equipment {M& TE} that has proven to not require periodic calibration. eti Conformity Services Reference No.: 8963053864F Page 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I eti Conformity Services: Reference No. Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Compliance Engineer: Client Information: Company Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Contact: Purchase Order No: Site Information: Site Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Site Contact: Jurisdiction Information: Inspector's Name: Jurisdiction: Appendices APPENDIX A Summary of Project Contacts 8963053864F Pacific Southwest Area Service Center 10606 Bloomfield Avenue Santa Fe Springs CA 90670 (562)-236-9555 (562)-777-8914 Nicholas Durazo Komori West Inc 1125 W. Victoria Street Compton, CA 90220 888-566-67 41 Mr. Jared Bradley UL0197 Iris Group 1675 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 800-959-8365 Mr. Jason Anderson Mr. Mike Peterson, Building Inspector City of Carlsbad, CA A-1 I I APPENDIX B I Field Evaluation Data Sheets I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • Ctl® Conformity Services CLIENT: Komori West LOCATION: ENGINEER: Carlsbad CA Nick Durazo EQUIPMENT: MODEL: Printin Press LS440SP RATINGS: February 28, 2007 CIRCUIT IDENTIFICATION A Incoming supply lines >1K >1K Februa 28,2007 VOLTAGE MEASUREMENTS PHASE A-N 123 REMARKS: PHASE B-N 123 PHASE C-N 124 Februa 28, 2007 COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION Incoming line 600 Amp circuit breaker Transformer "TR-M1" Contactor Power supply Motor PHASE PHASE PHASE PHASE A-B . B-C C-A A 212 212 213 122 oc 23.2 21.8 36.4 26.8 29.8 25.6 EMO AND INTERLOCK TESTS FIELD EVALUATION TEST DATA ETI JOB NUMBER: C >1K 8963053864 DATE: Februa 28 2007 SERIAL NO: 125 CALIBRATION DATE: 06-Feb PHASE TO PHASE A-B B-C C-A >1K >1K >1K CALIBRATION DATE: February, 2006 & PCNR CURRENT MEASUREMENTS PHASE PHASE B C NEUTRAL GROUND 124 122 CALIBRATION DATE: Februa , 2006 TEMPERATURE RISE TEST METHOD 3 Infrared 1.6 Infrared 16.2 Infrared 6.6 Infrared 9.6 Infrared 5.4 Infrared EMO FUNCTION TESTS INTERLOCK FUNCTIONAL TESTS DATE: DATE: LOCATION RESULT 26-Mar-03 RESULT INTERLOCK DESCRIPTION RESULT Operator Console A N/A Control panel door A GENERAL NOTES ETI LABEL NUMBER(s) 0112096 © eti 1998 F/6001 Page A= Acceptable, NIA= Not Applicable, C = Corrected, R = Needs Repair I I APPENDIX C I Photos I ,I I -1 I I I I I I I I I I I I C-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.1 Printing Press (incoming panel) 5.1 Printing Press (main panel) 5.1 Printing Press I I ,. APPENDIX D I Drawings I Drawings available on-site upon request I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D-1 CB062605 1675 FARADAY AV MODERN POSTCARD-ADD NEW PRINT! PRESS Tl INDUST \ Lot#: GARY L. BARTON CORPORATION (j/13/tb 70 ~ -Utrc ff~ µ/Jr;uif A CJ/10i/01o 0ho Q R f )G -(6/ ts c;J1 &.-fJJ fD/11,/06 fX,t/,u« 'Ir. cr~rha.{ ~ -2.) --f-v 3'6'1., <»/ Fru~~c.- I C1tv\ 1[ sl,p';:>h~~d wj.0eµ__, j ~ ~~-Sf-e'.C• /0-:Z~-tX,-jLt[ -JJ -1~·-p!.' lD(~ito~ -~s~GD S-2.. .-== ~t:=: C. ' ': -";! ~. I j } ! : :_: t i) . j ,•, •, L, .:.J t.: ... '<l~· .. JI \ ' CJ~ ~ BUILDING!)~ PLANNING ,J;NGINEERING 1f-'RE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT ------HAZMAT / AIRQUAL ______ OTHER SEWER DISTR TO FROM : ·UCANT APPLICANT _________ SCHOOL FORM -----+-____ CFO FORM -----+-----p E & M WORKSHEET __ __,_...,__~ ___ BLDG FEES COMPLET>- -----1.---PLAN CORR 3 --1-7.r-;,-,,--ENG ,-,, •RR --·: ---ESGIL N "<f _ __ ~--FIRE CC• R