The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1675 FARADAY AVE; ; CB972342; Permit01/29/98 11:06 Page 1 of 1 B U I L D I N G P E R M I T · Permit No: CB972342 Project No: A9702980 Development No: Job Address: 1675 FARADAY AV Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL TENANT Parcel No: 212-130-~00 IMPROVEMENT Suite: Lot#: 02 Valuation: 202,696 Occupancy Group: Reference#: 3520 01/29 /98 0001 01 Construction ~Xfr!: stfaElllr: VN Isie~OO Description: 7,796 SF WAREHOUSE TO OFFICE Applied: Apr/Issue: Entered By: 619 229-0642 08i22/97 01/29/98 MDP Appl/Ownr : MONTELLO, TERRY 4715 60TH STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92115 Fees Required *** _,,...,.,.·-6* ---F-ees Collected & Credi ts ,,/ ·, ----------------------------~ ----.,(/ .,,., ,,.,,.,,., .... ~ /~'., 1· "'-. 8, 244,({)0 /,, ' 1 f ,•\ \ f ,..:'\ ~' • / \ \., •-, l \.., I _. , { } '-Adj us tmen ts: // • 00-:;--...._;,., ( '<::·;:/'"·?:\<itaJ:1 oredi"t;s: i f ~ \' ~. f) ~ I *** Fees: .00 " , •• ~ I ' ', r\..b \ \ ··---' .,.-w .. _7 .-Ba.1-anqe _ ue, 7, 6 0 5 . 0 0 *** Total Fees: 1/' 44.00 1 i': Total/Payment:'~: 639.00 C /' ,r,..-./ ~~ ~ ~ J ,.,. \ .. \ Fee description ,,-\ \_ / ,,..?/, ,:~l:lni t-s :--f~e;/ur,i.i t Ext fee Data ___________________ .1 __ .;:-·,;::."---;i,.//. _____ <l(':·,.r.:"J~ ___ '"'\..< 'L-~--J __________________ _ 1 ;t.. · ..... ·,.;\;, \ ,_.,, \ Building Permit // (~ 1 ".;;--. "'~---·--··--------:,;_.,. ~_-:7\ ~~;-:,\ 1 1000.00 Plan Check c:::·--, / ·"~-,~~::,~ \ ) / \ 650. oo Strong Motion Feef (j ':: f ·,: -"";,?. / /fl\ ,,___ , 43. 00 Enter "Y" t~ Auto a~~-~iqense ~ix > -;_~J // v/,;;_,: i I 3689. 00 Y Enter Traffic Imp, ct 'Feel ~ _/1 ,1 "'~>.·· ~:;: f579,·~~ f I 2574. 00 Enter "Y" for Plumbing Is\s"U:e-.....·fl~:E:fi i.1·74 ,; f./.>::i,V: 11 I 20. oo Y • • \ \ .......... ,, { (::::'.:""',,) l " } ',,-4 l 7 01 Gas . Piping System \ \ "-~y· t ~ 'i 1, 0 ' q~ / . 0 1 7 . O O Enter II y II for Elect:ric Iss4e 'F-~e.1 ·......._il v?1fc~~.::,_;x-·.:;.r, // / 10. 0 0 y Remodel/Alter Per A~P " ; / > f-!# ¼· 800/ . is 200. 00 Enter 'Y' for Mechanica1f1"'."'issix~~Fe~~oRi•oRATcO _/ c··~.... .r 15.00 Y ' I ., '· 1%2 / , \ ';.) _...,, / Install Furn/Ducts/He~\~p:tg"~· ,~, ··--.... )._ .. JJ_ __ .. ..--.. / .-... \~\\( j. 00 36. 00 · "'') I I/ ;·· , ..... , \ ,:::-... '-'-· / . \ ... f , I ; ~ ..... ._ ,,,,, .. ~._ , ,,.) ·\\'"',) / '-._ f \, j (,r" \. \ ·, ~ / \ 1 "'-. '-....;f._; ,, 11\;<:iv ,,/ ~, \ ........ ..,.,1 / -) ~ /.,,, ....... '-...,,.,.,-_,/' ............... ,.........__,_...._ .... ___ ,, _______ _..,.,,,,.., ..... APPROVAL 1--1--pr;.,_.___ DA TE~~ /rt" CLEARANCE ..__ ====::---- CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 vlf7S37 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO. g],,. 1._,,~~q__ EST. VAL. (lPL,.,, (a ct+, CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Pal mas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 . Plan Ck. ~~it {e}''l. u a Validated By_, ~--. Date V( V °J1 Business Name {at this address) Phase No, Total # of units 02 639-00 #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms ~q:._Dblf ;)_ Fax# Name A dress i5, ., · ·99~'(AA9TOR.:: C .. 9Ml?!\l'iY':Jllp.lYJi':.: . . .. . . . , . . . . . . {Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged tion. Any violation of Section 70 5 by any pplicJri¼oµ-permit s~~ts the r~plicant to af_!¥il l?enalt of not more than five hundred !iQ,_llyrf,LH0¢]). • '-t I.:::> UJ~vru.ctta e,_C. ·'JO I.J,()~ /'-1:d-'-f Desig er Name Address CitY. State/Zip ~:a~~~~~;;:s:.flt!i~1!!!f. ~~-~ff_:.~: ~~itliJ .... ~r_~:.~:·:: Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. "bl. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is .(s;~ed. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company ?I~ MpTP /tJ---, Policy No.Wt:,:Z., /b/•&>g/G,'51-t:)/~xpiration Dateft--O/• t::f'S (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dolla 00,000), inJigdi • n to the ost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ~ DATE l '~ •j,8 ii: ,_.QWNER~BUltDJtftDECJ;ARATf011f ....... _,:·~ .... _ . : ... ·~~·-:. ::=..:::.: ._·. ·;·_ ...... :, ."_ . ·. · · · .,. " ... -· ''.,,, - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale {Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale}. 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project {Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor{sl licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I {have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted_ with the following person {firm) to provide the proposed construction {include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work {include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted {hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated {include name/ address / phone number/ type of work}: _______________________________________________________ _ DATE ----------- Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 1>~-~-=s?iN~r13yc1;,qrft_e.t,tJ?.lH~N~1;l_l~Y~.:~-=·~.:,~~ h:::~ -:~-~:{_; ~r--. ---;~:L ;_:~ -.-~:_, ~ ~: ·:: -~ ll ·" --N -N -- I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued {Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). I certify that I have read the application and state that·the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree t City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit~ of Carlsbad to enter upon th property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINS JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUI; AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories In height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced it in 365 days fro e ate of such permit or if the building or work aJ,J horized by such perp· is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is com men fo a i d a ~ction 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). • 1 , C),l APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE --------1--"----'-"---'"'-".._ _ ___;:..:U"'-C-________ DATE --tt---"-...<--'.:;l....:.__~~1---- WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance ~r J S E W E R P E R M I T 01/29/98 11:06 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1675 FARADAY AV Permit Type: SEWER -OFFICE/WAREHOUSE Parcel No: 212-130-33-00 Description: 7,796 SF TENANT IMPROVEMENT : WAREHOUSE TO OFFICE Suite: Permit ·No: SE970186 Bldg Planck#: Status: ISSUED Applied: 10/17/97 Apr/I$SUe: 01/29/98 Permitee: MONTELLO, TERRY 6 1 9 2 2 9-0 6 4 23520 01/29 .E9sPOOOO:COl 02 4715 60TH STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92115 *** Fees: Adjustments: Total Fees: Prepares'l,-p~: MAM-;449.00 ,-AL A.PPR.OVAL F\N . OAiE------- U\\SP.__.----- CLEARANCE----------:::::::::::::=::: '-- CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT# CB972342 DESCRIPTION: 7,796 SF TYPE: ITI JOB ADDRESS: 1675 APPLICANT: MONTELLO, CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 03/16/98 WAREHOUSE TO OFFICE FARADAY AV TERRY PERMIT# CB962041 SE960138 AS970045 FS970019 FAD97033 CB970548 SE970057 WM970035 SE970186 CB973796 FA980002 FAD98005 CB980150 TYPE INDUST SWCI ASC FIXSYS FADD ITI swow WMETER swow ITI FALARM FADD ITI PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB972342 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN LOT: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural AP_ 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical t -------------------- ------------------ ------------------,-- ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 031298 Final Combo AP TP 031198 Final Combo NR TP NOT COMPETE 020498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP MEZZ EXTN@ 225,226,223 020498 Rough Electric AP TP WALL&CEIL LITES@225,226,223 020498 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP MEZZ EXTN @225,226,223 020498 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP TP DUCTS@ MEZZ EXTN@ 225,226,22 020498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP 2HR WALL RE-LOC@ 126 020498 Interior Lath/Drywall AP TP @ 126 >- 03/13/98 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT# CB972342 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS 03/11/98 Final Combo RI RI C/MARK/619/520-1409 03/11/98 Final Combo TP NR NOT COMPETE 02/04/98 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel TP AP MEZZ EXTN@ 225,226,223 02/04/98 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel TP AP 2HR WALL RE-LOC@ 126 02/04/98 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP MEZZ EXTN @225,226,223 02/04/98 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP @ 126 02/04/98 Rough Electric TP AP WALL&CEIL LITES@225,226,223 02/04/98 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP AP DUCTS@ MEZZ EXTN@ 225,226,223 HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE ... HAMANN CONSTRUCTION === General Contracting & Development === City of Carlsbad Tim Phillips 475 W. BRADLEY A VENUE, EL CAJON, CALIF. 92020 PHONE; 619-440-7424 FAX; 619-440-8914 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, Calif. 92009 Dear Tim, This letter is to verify that the Main Electrical Service for Iris Building, 1675 Faraday Dr. #A has been installed and torqued as per the manufacturers and U.L. specifications. Sincerely, Carl Seuss COPPER ELECTRIC, INC. COPPER INDUSTRIAL CENTER 10054 Prospect Avenue, Suite T • P.O. Box 710666 • Santee, California 92072 February 6, 1998 Attn: Mr. Tim Phillips City of Carlsbad Building Inspection Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: The Iris Group 1675 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA Dear Mr. Phillips, This letter verifies that Copper Electric, Inc. has torqued electrical metering equipment and all subordinate panels, per manufacturers specifications. Si7el~ '7--L_ ~-7~~ Laref Tat man President LT/cc LIC. NO. C-10 280163 • PHONE: (619) 562-5600 -FEB 10 '98 08=15RM ETI SRN DIEGO P.3/8 San Diego Area Office 9835 CARROLL CENTER ROAD, SUITE 103 SAN OIEGO, CA 92126 . Independent Testing & Engineering Services for Electrical Power Systems GROUND FAULT SYSTEM TEST REPORT ETI Reference #: 228-4043 Customer P.O.#: Job 1380 Client: Copper Electric P.O. Box 710666 Santee, CA 92072-0666 Attention: Mr. Larry Tatman 1.0 PURPOSE Date: January 28, 1998 Site: fris Group ·\T675-Farooay'"Ava~ Carlsbad, CA (619) 695-9551 !=AX (619) 695-0861 Performance tests of the ground fault protective equipment are conducted to verify proper installation and operation. The current National Electrical Code Section 230- 95(c) requires an on site test on new installations of all ground fault systems upon installation. 2.0 SUMMARY 2.1 At the request of Mr. Larry Tatman of Copper Electric, the ground fault system testing was performed by Mr. Al Fialho of Electro-Test, Inc. on January 28th, 1998. 2.2 The system was found operational and acceptable. 2.3 Relay settings were provided by Gordon Rice of Copper Electric. 2.4 The '1as-left11 ground fault settings are as follows: 6l2-HJ-98 Circuit Main 6)8: 14 Amperes Picku2 200 Time Delay: 0.4 RECEIVED FROM:5195956>861 p,6)3 FEB 10 '98 OB: 15AM ETI SAi'! DIEGO 3.0 EQUIPMENT TESTED 3.1 Pringle fused switch, 4000 amp_ 4.0 PROCEDURES 612-HJ-98 4.1 Visual and Mechanical Inspection 4.1.1 Inspected components for physical damage and installation in compliance with manufacturer's instructions. 4_ 1 _2 Determined ground fault sensor was located properly around appropriate conductors. o Zero sequence and residual sensing requires al I phases and the neutral to be encircled by the sensor. 4_ 1 _3 Inspected main bonding jumper to assure: o Proper size. o Termination on source side of neutral disconnect link. o Termination on source side of sensor on zero sequence systems. 4.1 .4 r nspected grounding electrode conductor to assure: o Proper size. o Correct switchboard termination. 4.1.5 Inspected ground fault control power transformer for proper installation and size. o When control transformer is supplied from line side of ground fault protection circuit interrupting device, overcurrent protection and a circuit disconnecting means must be provided. 4_ 1 _6 Visually inspected switchboard neutral bus downstream of neutral disconnect link to verify absence of ground connections. f,)8: 14 RECEIVED FROM:619695f,)861 p,@4 FEB 10 '98 08:16RM ETI SRN DIEGO F',5/8 612-Hl-98 4.2 Electrical Tests 4.2.1 Ground fault system performance including correct response of the circuit interrup1ing device was confirmed by primary ground sensor current injection. o Relay pickup current was measured. o Relay time delay was measured at two values above pickup. 4.2.2 Tested system operation at fifty-five percent of rated voltage. 4.2.3 Functionally checked operation of ground fault monitor panel for: o Trip test o No trip test. o Non-automatic reset. 4.2.4 Functionally checked operation of ground fault indicator for correct indication of ground fault trip. 4.2.5 Verified proper sensor polarity on phase and neutral sensors for residual systems. 4.2.6 Measured system neutral insulation resistance downstream of neutral disconnect link to verify absence of grounds. 4.3 Test Results Evaluation 4.3.1 System neutral insulation resistance should be above 100 ohms and preferably 1 megohm or greater. 4.3.2 The maximum pickup setting of the ground fault protection shall be 1200 amperes and the maximum time delay shall be one second for ground fault currents equal to or greater than 3000 amperes (NEC 230--95). 4.3.3 The relay pickup current should be within ten percent of the manufacturer's cal.ibration marks or fixed setting. 4.3.4 Relay timing should be in accordance with the manufacturer's publlshed time-current characteristic curves. 618: 15 RECEIVED FROM:5195950851 P,615 FEB 10 '98 08:15RM ETI SRN DIEGO F'.t/8 5.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 The ground fault relay system was found correctly installed and operating properly. 5.2 This ground fault system incorporates external control power. The installing contractor must verify the presence of control voltage upon service energization. ~ '\-('.) ~ ~ Submitted by: Al Fialho Field Engineer Attachment --~ 02-Hl-98 08: 15 RECEIVED FROM:6196950861 P-616 GROUND FAULT SYSTEM TEST .REPORT ENGINEER: AL~\~ WITNES$;<,;,,o (Z..,1=\9"'\. TEST EQUIP_ ASSET# "2-t ~ ~ c::, "t...""} g P.7/8 MAIN OVERCIJRRENT DEVICE D CIACLJIT 8AEAKE'.R MFGR._a."l\ i.,,../ I L !El: FUSED SWITCH 1 r'-l-,.,.,__ TYPE MOC>EL/CAT, NO. CV ARENT RATING SYSTEM VOl..1"AGE ~(JOO "-(_ ~ 0 r 2... "17 VOLTAGE J:,ATING G-.S-~3l4 l(So GROUND FAULT SYSTEM MFGR. D NE;U'J"AAL,-GROVND STRAP 21;1'!0-SEQUE;NCt: MODEL CAT. NO. PICK-Vf' FIANG5 lfl B&~L~\5"'\-\G.oo Loo -\~o AS f'OUNO SETilNG PICKL.JP J n,,.. CURRENT ...&.Q._ AS LEFT SETTING TIME .Q.i.L_ ~lf~~&NT jQQ_ TIME RANGE· SENSOR/C.T. u, 1-L ... o 6+ l-0$' f x_"}o l -2. SETTINGS SUPPLleo BY ~-Ha 0~t· : 1. ' ' :. :·, '·'., (<. GROlJNDELECTRODECONOUCTOFI ;, C @ AWG D MCM CONTAOLFOWCATRANSFORMEA NEUTAAL-GFIOUNC> LOCATION COFlRECT D INCORRECT D CORRECTED 6Y CONTRACTOR VA?.,.:,..,• MONITOR/TEST PANEL OPERATION CORRE.CT D INCORRECT '•', 't,' AE;OUCED VOLTAGE TES"I" (t;,l;i% RATED VOLTAGE) SECONOS D CYCLES CORRECT D INCORRECT PICK-UP CURRENT "Z_c;,,Z AMPS PICK-UP CU ARENT MINUS 25% ( l!9. NO TFIIP (CO RAE.CT) SYSTE;;M NEU'i"RAL INSLII.ATION AESIS'TANCE TO GROUND TIMl;-CUFIREN"f CAU6RATION TESiS REMARKS GFSTR/90 <>1990 1:n -t:g 1 -MEGOHMS PRIMARY CURRENT PERCENT AMPERE-TU ANS PICK-UP 3,i;o . (~b "'(r, l..fo¼ -zmo II Io ~~ 5 ~ Go~!)l1lo1-1 IS (I NCO A RECT) TOTAL. REAC''flON RELAY TIME TIME TIME 0 ,;:,'?, c,,e, I $;)' S'l c,57..., ID, D \ i:o ·rJ Jk.Ld/Tk\-tL tn-Hl-98 98: 15 RECEIVED FROM:5195959851 MFGR. YOLERANCE ~ ~u,;}I., + \Od'( c, PAGE_\_Of~ P-97 ;-. ~. FEB 10 '98 os: 15AM ETI SAN DIEGO , t ' !f"·~ GQB'"C:'l<:'ctro ® tC:'1t F'.8/8 CLIENT Pl'!OJi;c, PSWA/90 b-Jsro ETI Co ?V"'[ ~\ { l 'z C T)1....\ L :i:µ_r::-$ &-A-t?--"tJ p l (r:,7 Y -:;:i;:::::,.t.r\..ai,7::>A....y' ~·-.Jc PROJECT STATUS REPORT/ WORK AUTHORIZATION laTIJOBNO. 7 ,.,..'{ ~ --{ tl '-C) EN01NE'ER .bl~ !.6 L .. "\-l--o DAtE;: Ol -l ;1" "°i f THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY INFORMATION AS TO THE STATUS OF THIS PROJECT. A FORMAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THE PROJECT COMPLETION. D T~~-FOU,.OY".{l~G ITEMS R~~_?UIRE RELACEMENT, REPAIR ANO/OR ADJUSTMENT: D THE FOLLOWING TESTS AND/OR INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION: . , ~ THE FOLLOWING WORK IS AUTHORIZED: .. 1 • i -.vi·,~~;:_ c:;tz · ·· ·-tc.u , 17 L+'-:·r:;9<;:_ r~-'\. -· er s 33 1 (.f ~-:: ( Lfo oo -A-'M f 1 ,'2 , G +--T-2 ~ V.,.'-f , J:.'TI {_).,T/v. -'fl ( ... fL -\ \S-\ e,,:;, r,, G-·1=' P-· 7 < \T , l~ lrS 7 0 0 A-Mf5 2o-z. 0 , <'; t AUTHORIZATION NO, /.3~0 v WHliE'COPY -FILE, PINK COPY -CUSTOMER tn-Hl-98 (S)8: 15 RECEIVED FROM:519595tsl851 PAGE 7.-OF ""2..- P-El8 ' ., I I \ WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES October 20, 1997 Steve Hoffman 6345 Corte Del Abeta, #D Carlsbad, California 92009 • San Diego Co. • Riverside Co. • Orange Co. • San Bernardino Co. • Los Angeles Co. • Kern Co. • Imperial Co. • Las Vegas 1-800-487-0355 WTL No. 97-091 Report No .. 1 SUBJECT: Final Report of Special Inspection, Faraday Avenue/'1675 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California. Permit #962041 Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, this report has been prepared as a final report of the Special Inspections which were performed at the subject site. The inspections were performed by representatives of Wyman Testing Laboratories at the direction of the General Contractor. Reinforced concrete with design strengths in excess of 2000 psi ( except slabs on grade) were sampled and compressive strengths confirmed. Reinforcing steel used there-in, was inspected by a Registered Special Inspector for correct size, grade, spacing, laps, clean-ups and clearance. Field welding of structural steel, joists, and metal deck have been periodically inspected by a Registered Special Inspector. Field welding was inspected for joint preparation, fit-ups and welders' technique. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and quality. Field welding of panel to hold downs, panel to panel have been continuously inspected by a Registered Special Inspector. Field welding was inspected for joint preparation, fit-ups and welders technique. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and quality. Complete penetration moment welds ·have been ultrasonically tested for soundness and any defective welds removed, replaced and retested satisfactorily. Installation of high-strength bolts was observed for proper hole dimensions and bearing surfaces in accordance with approved drawings. Verified tension strength by torque wrench method. 17150 VIA DEL CAMPO, STE 307, SAN DIEGO, CA 92127 PHONE (619) 675-0270 FAX (619) { Page2 This report summarizes the Special Inspection reports which have been submitted to the City of Carlsbad. It is to the best of our knowledge that all work requiring special inspection was in compliance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable building codes. If you should have any questions after reviewing this repo.rt, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of a professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES WB/cls cc: (1) Submitted (1) Kenneth D. Smith (1) Hamann Construction (1) Ajit Randha & Associates (1) City of Carlsbad ·( Wyman ·~~ lE Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -f't1'?fRf~raday Ave. NC97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Oct. 3 197 '.F~11f~8.'a:'§0 A~~fi.1tl_Ee ~~~~~;ff· I PLAN FILE NO. 8~Effl't9TYPE. GRADE, ETC.) 'ieCHITECTth D enne • Smith ~{)1c)STfl§~H I sou~~'.lit~H7 Sloan ~Gl~feR · , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ifNERAL CON'EACTO!t_ t , amann ons rue ion Mix #602 1PcIBi'hWriNG REPORTED WORK grade 60 rebar/6x6 WWM ~man Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 10-1-97 6:30 am. Observation and inspection of reinforcement, 6x6 WWM W/rebar @ opening reinforcing. 7:00 am. Observation and inspection of 80 cubic yards Nelson/Sloan mix #602 a 1" rock pump mix placed at a consistent 5 11 slump consolidated by mechanical vibration area placed mezzanine deck between lines J & R, 6-2 & 3.5. 8:40 am. Sampled load #4 truck #401, ticket #17462 @ 39.5 cubic yards, ambient air temp 76 degrees F. Concrete temp 79 degrees F. Slump 5", Cast one set of compressive 4 concrete strength cylinders pump). CLS 10-22-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. sampled from deck (after Rockland Dale SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECToR DATE OF l~EPORf REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~f§D":F'&raday Ave. N<:!)7-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Oct. 3 ,97 :F?~~~a~~0 i~wtt~~ ~~0~11TNO. I PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) ,recHITECTth D enne • Smith §~16~sT,~TH I SOU'.ife £'s~H7s 1 oan ~jrtRRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) IfM&~Hfi?NE&~~lruction Mix #602, 1" rock W/WRDA 64 I.Pcl:ffiai<iiN<c<6W~~~~8~ion grade 60 rebar/6x6 WWM wtman Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 9-30-97 6:30 Observation and inspection of reinforcement and placement of concrete@ mezzanine level deck area located between lines J to A, and 5 to 1. 7: 00 Observed placement/consolidation of 99 cubic yards Nelson/Sloan mix #602 a 1" rock pump mix placed at a reasonably consistent 5" slump, consolidated by mechanical vibration. 8:20 Sampled load :!F4 truck :!F400, ticket :IF17415 at 39.5 cubic yards ambient temp 77 degrees F, concrete temp 81 degrees F, slump 5". Cast one set of 4 concrete compressive strength specimens, sampled from hopper. NON-COMPLIANCE: NOTE: Stair landing at point 3.5 & B not placed. CLS 10-22-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Rockland Dale SIGNATURE oF l~EGlslERED INSPECloR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER JOB ADDRESS N0.97-091 FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 2 6 19 9 7 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CB962041 ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. Electri ENGINEER Ad.it Randha and Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR Hamann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Steel LAB W man Testin Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-29-97 Observed and inspected certified welders perform FCAW fillet welds @ mezzanine level outriggers and@ roof level tube steel posts/rail framin~ f~t up & spot welding south perimeter. Welding inspection performed on a periodic basis. Visually inspected welds for compliance with UBC, AWS Dl.l. Project plans and for location size, length, profile. Non compliance None this date. JKM 10-08-97 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT .I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS .WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER NO. 97-091 ENDING Se t. 26 19 97 DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CB962041 ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith ENGINEER Ad"it Randha and Associates GENERAL CONTRACTOR Hamann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Steel Erection LAB W man Testin Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-23-97 Observation and inspection of certified welders performing FCAW fillet welds of tube steel posts/rails@ roof level framing of south perimeter fit up & spot. Visually inspected welds for correct location, size, length, and any irregularities. Non Compliance None this date JKM 10-09-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS. WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Rockland Dale Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT . 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER NO. 97-091 FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 2 6 19 9 7 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. CB962041 ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER · n·Electric Ad'it Randha and Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE:BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR Hamann Construction 9-22-97 CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Steel LAB W an Testin Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION Observed certified welders perform: 1. SMAW puddle welding of steel decking at mezzanine levels. 2. SMAW fillet welding of ASTM A36, safety rails to deck framing and tube steel to WF beams@ roof.level. Inspection performed on a periodic basis. Visual inspection of welds for correct location, size, length, profile. Found no rejectable. welds. JKM 10-08-97 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS. WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. 7 otfE 0fr R1P2Rf Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER FOR WEEK ENDING e t. 19 19 97 PLAN FILE NO. ssociates CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK . . LAB FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-19-97 (SSW A36) Observed certified welders performing: 1. SMAW puddle welding of steel decking to steel bar girder/joists at roof line@ opening by Draheim. 2. FCAW fillet welding of ledger splices at mezzanine level using E71Tll and Lincoln Electric wire feeds by Sierra Steel Erectors. Visually inspected welds for location, size, and length. With the exception of noted locations, found no other rejectable welds. Ledger splice plate welds at points along lines. JKM 9-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Rockland Dale Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER NO. ENDING Se t. 19 19 97 PLAN FILE NO. ARCHITECT mith DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER dha and Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR o struction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-18-97 Observed certified welders perform: heim tories 1. SMAW puddle welds@ steel decking at roof and mezzanine levels as per project requirements, i.e 3/4", 1/2" effective@ 12" o.c. 2. FCAW fillets@ ledger splice plates@ mezzanine level exterior wall lines and interior tilt-up panel connections. · Visual inspection of vrelds for compliance with correct location, size, length. Found no rejectable flaws. JKM 9-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Rockland Dale Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER FOR WEEK ENDING et. 19 19 97 PLAN FILE NO. mith Randha and Associates FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-17-97 (6 Welders: AWS Certified) Steel Laboratories Observed & inspected (visually) the erection and welding of the e~closure angle around the edge of the decking, located 2nd floor between grids N & P and 5 thru 7, 1/411 fillet welds, 12 o.c. Sierra Erectors are doing the work, using 3 welders. Draheim Steel is completing the puddle welding@ the roof level, between grids A thru Rand 1 thru 8, also they are welding on the 2nd floor, 1 thru 6 and A thru R, per SD4/8, · 1/2 11 puddle welds @ ea/low & 12 o.c. @ the parallels, 1-1/211 stitch/welds 24 11 o.c. @ the seams, using 3 welders. Inspected the completed welds for size, length, location, and u.n.o, no discrepancies found~ Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques and to the best of my knowledge, all welding is by accordance with the approved plans and specifications . JKM 9-24-97 . Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE . I HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE JOB ADDRESS NO. FOR WEEK ENDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. ARCHITECT SOURCE OR MFGR. nd Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) uction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK · el LAB SHOW UP 9-16-97 No work, 2 hr show/up, rain/out. JKM 9-24-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Laboratories Robert Dickerson 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER 19 97 Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-15-97 (5 Welders: AWS Certified) teel Observed and visually inspected the continuous field welding of the enclosure plate between grids N & P and 3 thru 6, 1/4" fillet welds@ 12 o.c. Sierra Erectors did the welding, with 3 AWS certified welders. Electrodes: NR211 FCAW & 7018 1/8" low/hyd. Inspected the welding @ roof level by Draheim Steel, where they cut the decking@ the edge of the flr. @ grids A thru R around the perimeter, 1/2" puddle every low per S4/8, 3-welders. Electrodes: 6022 (SMAW process) Inspected welds for size, length, location & u.n.o, no discrepancies found. Work stopped at 11:00am due to rain, (inclimate weather). JKM 9-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE . ~j§DRf'a.raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 1'iJ7 ~~~a~~0A~~ti'e ~:8~ ~~IJfi0· I PLAN FILE NO. ~Si~TR~~r.f~RADE. ETC.) ,recHITECTth D enne • Smith §'3l;tH)lijNGTH I SOt,'FaR~1J1.ffiR-steel ~GINfR , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) rf.NERAL CONE,ACTOf t , amann ons rue ion "B II decking, electrodes:6022 SMAW DONT'.h DOING ~'t_ORTE:r. WORK ra eim ee process ~~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-12-97 Observed & Visually inspected the continuous field welding of the "B" decking on the 2nd roof levels between grids A thru R & 1 thru 8. Welding per SD4/A. 1/2" puddle welds @ every low @ the parallels 12 o.c., crimp, button punch & stitch welds @ 24 o.c. (1-1/2" stitch min.). To the best of my knowledge, all welding is in accordance with the approved plans & specifications & and unless otherwise noted, no discrepan9ies found. Inspected the welds for size, length, & location, observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. - :,J :},:: CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~-d:-J:t,61',,_1.,fl}.., AJ½t ./ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS 0' ;;NA_IUl<t:'vr1<c:1.:>1;:,1~IN~t:<..,;IUI< $,.i), OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. RE~NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE fl1's°Rf~raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 197 ~~'lf ~8_~§ 01\'v~titlEe ~~~~41:f'· I PLAN FILE NO. ~'f3'1iTR~c'k!rrif RADE, ETC.) 'ieCHITEC\h D enne • Smith ~1;1'6~NGTH I SOUIJ5f gt~.r:in 'A'.Gl~'tR , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1.f.NERAL CONEACTO!t_ t . amann ons rue ion 22GA #446 decking 1}jNT[h_D0NG R§'i?RTE'l_ WORK ra eim ee Electrodes:6022 SMAW Process '\:v~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-11-97 5 welders AWS certified Observed & visually inspected the continuous field welding of the roof & 2nd floor decking. Located between grid lines A thru Rand grid lines #1 thru #8. Welded per SD4/A. 1/2" puddle welds@ each/low & 12 o.c. @ the parallels @ the seams crimped & stitched weld 1-1/2" min. @ 24 o.c. To the best of my knowledge all welding meets or exceeds the criteria set forth in the AWS Dl.3-96 manual & all other applicable codes, plans & specifications. Inspected welds for size, length, location & unless otherwise noted no discrepancies found. Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. (2) welders were added @ 12:00 pm. Eugene sherwood and Alice K. Lesley (L.A. certified) • -., . t '. CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE l.R ~i1J,.:l lx;,,, ~ I} J-, ,4,&--,, ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ;:,1..,NAIUl-lt: '-Jr--~-"-"~'"-;/-"'.,ric-..,IVI< OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ' , SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~f'§D'F'&raday Ave. N~7-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept• 12 ,97 F~~~a!,0 t~emij'e ~13~ ~~1J{f· I PLAN FILE NO. ~Si~~R· ~t;~PE@~~FB_<g' i«E~1t"fi~/th D. Smith :3is1;~fQ~NGTH j souizr.Hi:M~lfi'rr steel ~JrfRRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) lfMn~HiPNE~rl~lruction "B II decking, electrodes:6022 SMAW If±N~h~T~ ~lo~~:f_ WORK Process ~man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-10-97 Observed & visually inspected decking to the joists. the continuous field welding of the roof A meeting was held yesterday 2:30 pm between the reps from Hamann Construction, Draheim Steel & Sierra Erectors. Where the pipe posts sit.on the joists & W/F beams Draheim Steel, \~lll weld angle backing for deck bearing as needed. Where the enclosure plate on the 2nd floor, needs to be the same height as the joists, the engineer of record will be sending a detail fix on the situation. At roof level, Draheim Steel shook-out the decking & welded@ grids 1 & 2 between A thru D, also went line 4 between D thru P lines. Cutting the deck around the pipe posts, as needed per SD4/A, 1/2" puddle welds, every low & @ parallels 12 O. C. 1 crimped & stitched welded {1-1/2" min) 24 o.c. shook/out decking @ grids E thru s between 6 thru 8 {roof level). Inspecteq. welds for size, length, location & unless otherwise noted no discrepancies found. Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. To the best of my knowledge. I .·.( ......... CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE --/1_/J..J½ 7f: lJ 1 ~ ! O}, .A.th. J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ,. I ;:,1\:>l'<M1Ul<r: vr ""'-"'"' r:/D 1N5Pl::~TOR OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & 0 • ~ ·.· . SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (61_9) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WEL0ING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE . 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER Ncg7-Q91 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept• 12 I PLAN FILE NO. decking ~31l~e Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) "B" Decking G~NERAL CON-WACTOR t • Hamann cons~ruc ion ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-9-97 3 welders AWS Certified Visually observed & inspected the continuous field welding of the "B" decking to the joists starting@ grid J to P between #1 thru #8 lines per SD4/A 1/2" puddle welds @ each/low & 12 o.c. on the parallels. 1-1/2" stitch/welqs (min) 24 o.c. on the seams, after button punching (crimping) roof level. Spoke with Mark Miller (early am) superintendent for Hamann, regarding the areas that can/not be decked, till backing for ~earing is welded or enclosure bent plate is needed@ various locations, on the 2nd floor & roof. He will get with the involved parties. Draheim Steel started laying out· the sheets on the 2nd floor, starting between grids J & L between 3 & 6.2. All welding is in compliance with the plans & specifications (approved) ot the best of my knowledge. Inspected the welds for size, length & location & unless otherwise noted, no defects found. Observed welders for proper procedures and techniques. CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. REGEIVE"D SEP 2 5 1997 Wyman Testing :.-i Laboratories (6-1.9) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF i'681'3D¥Araday Ave. 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING N{97-091. 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept• 12 I PLAN FILE NO. I sou'Df gri_~ir& Const. ~rr~RRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) "B" decking electrodes: 6022 SMAW process Wfman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-8-97 3 welders AWS Certified 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER {47 Observed & visually inspected the continuous field welding of roof decking to the O. W. bar joists • Starting @ grid line A between 1 thru 8 linei:H Welded to L line. 1/2" puddle welds @ every low & 12 o. c. on the parallels.,.! Crimped & stitched @ 12 o.c. & 24 o.c. a min. 1-1/2" on the stitch/welding per SD4/sect. A schedule. Where the short (pipe) post sit on top of the w/f beams starting@ line D between 1 & 2 going east around the radius@ the roof level, need to have angle plate welded to the joists, for bearing of min. of 2" to let the decking sit on it. A plate on each/side of the posts. Inspected welds for size, length, location & to the best of my knowledge, unless otherwise noted, all welding in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Welders observed for proper procedures and techniques. CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ii8f§D'Wiraday Ave. 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING N(97-09 l 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 5 I PLAN FILE NO. D k · e-.RCHITEcrth D Smi' th B ec 1.ng Kenne • DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) "B" Decking, bar joists electrodes:7018 1/8 low/hyd (NR211} G.ENERAL CONJl<ACTOR t , rtamann ~ons~ruc ion ~§,man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-5-97 4 AWS Certified welders 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER 07 Observed & Visually inspected the continuous field welded the "B" decking to the o.w. bar joists & truss girders roof level. Draheim Steel Co. doing the ~ork, they have (2) crews working (1) shaking out the deck & tack welded and (1) crew following behind, puddle welds & stitch welding started shaking/out @ J line to Pline, stirted welding@ A thru J lines per S4A. 1/2" puddle Melds 12 o.c. 1-1/2" stitch/welds 12 o.c. (3) welders, electrodes 6022. Sierra Steel Erectors Inc. started work@ grid lines 6.5 to P lines@ 3 line. lwelded doubler /plates, where the C. P. welding occurred for the moment connections @ 2nd floor and roof line at the same location torqued the remaining 3/4 T.S. 325 high\strength bolts welds per SD4/ll,14 & 2. At grids A thru D between 1 & 2 lines installed (3} joists, left/out due to panel bracing per D4/1. To the best of my knowledge unless otherwise noted all welding in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Observed welders for proper procedures and techniques. ICLS 09-10-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1-HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE'FOUND THISWORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ,PECIFICATl~NS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. •.,. ____ .,. ..... • •• R ... , .. ~ ••• ~' ·. ·. } Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE · 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~-fgDR_p>&raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 5 97 :@~~c[tI~ y0 !~~ztij~ ~13~ 6~~141°· I PLAN FILE NO. A~~r~tiB'tu<¥~1E-'sl:kel & B Decking recHITECth D enne • Smith ~'31;'tit)~N(&TH 36 r 000 I s9,~.!:R~~Jsierra %:CalNfR , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) IllNERAL CO~ACTOf , amann ons ruction 4-1/2"x6" closer plate B decking s'.r'Ji~~Nt~~0Jf?~£~'beim steel & A325 high/strength bolts & 307 soft/ W§'man Testing Laboratories bolts FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-4-97 6 AWS certified Welders Visually observed & inspected the continuous field welding of the roof decking 1/2 puddle welds @ every low, 1-1/2" stitch/welds 12" o.c. @ the parallels 24" o.c. every/where else per S-4A work located @ grid A thru J between grids 1 thru 8. Draheim Steel did the work ( 3 ) welders. Electrodes 6022 (SMAW). Sierra Steel erectors continued to install and weld the 4-1/2"x6" curved enclosure plate to the connecting lugs @ grids J thru p & 1 thru 6 lines located 2nd floor level per SDl0/6 1/4" fillets (2) sides. (3) welders, they tightened & installed 307 & 325 T.S. bolts @ various locations on the 2nd level, where they were missing. Electrodes: 7018 1/8 low/hyd (SMAW). To the best of my knowledge all welding is in accordance with the approved plans and specifications unless otherwise noted no discrepancies found. Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. CLS 09-10-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson - CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ./r:!~ _d:'£,,µ,_/o A LJj h1--> I HEREBY CERT-IF-Y. THAfi'HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ~ /47/]?'_u;;C: vr 1<c:-=,1~l 9tl~~t'C<-IVI< ~~ OTHERWISE (NOT~E FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATlpNS, , · P -Q~B~E SECTIONS. ; . Llr\11:: vr 1<C:rJV1<I RE~OMBER -: . Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ft53t§D~.?iraday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept • 5 1i7 ~¥3'.~~a~7'0f~eMij1e ~'.a~ ~~1I{f · I PLAN FILE NO. ji~TRS'i:f\fff~E. ~1efoEJ.C,)& 446 B decking 'I{iCHITECTth D enne • Smith :3631;f(;~'{jN~H 3 6 I 0 0 0 I sou'jyf ~tW.t':ffi/ Sierra ~G1WfeR • Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1f.NERAL C0N~ACT0I . t . amann ons rue ion 4-1/2x6 ledger angle ~TR. D01N1:fePORJ:/~ORKh , St l erra ee ra eim ee Co. 446 B decking (20 ga & 16 GA) vt~an Testing Laboratories electrodes: 7018 1/8 low hyd & 6022 FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-3-97 3 welders Visually observed & inspected the continuous field welding of the 4-1/2"x6" closer angle (curved). Located 2nd floor/level between grids H.3 thru R intersected by grid 3. Welded connecting clips to the w/f beams per SDl0/16 1/4 fillet 2/sides. Welded beam@ grid P & 6 lines (W24x55). Welded beam to embed on panel@ P.6 & 5 lines per SD.4/9&14B. Sierra Steel Co. did the 2nd floor welding. ( 3) welders. Inspected the welding of the roof decking to the roof joists & girders per S4 roof metal deck gage & welding schedule, puddle weld @ each-low at the parallels 120 o.c. @ the seams 1-1/2" welds. Started welding the decking between grids 4 thru 6 & A thru J. Draheim Steel Co. did the welding ( 3) welders. Inspected welds for size, length, location & unless otherwise noted, no discrepancies. To the best of my knowledge all welding meets or exceeds the criteria set forth in the AWS Dl.1 & Dl. 3-96 manuals & all other applicable codes, plans and specifications. CLS 09-10-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson f!!~~{~-, CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE -/? lf-MA.:f ~ ~/oh L<J-,,J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS I • ::,11.::>NAJUl~t: Vr l<t:<.:>l.>lt:l~t:U ~->r't:Clvi< OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND T IS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE S~CTIONS. (Q Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -f~j~Rr~raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept 5 197 ~If ~a~go'!'v~ri1tl_Ee B9~2 ff!1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. A~lll· ~~PE~tfcY/T~3 2 5 ~CHITECTth D enne • Smith ¥6'G~l§31TH LfR~8iRRff~ctric ~~lf1ee~ng ineer ing DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1fNERAL CONEACTO't: t . amann ons rue ion NR211, E71Tll FCAW fillTR. DOIN~ORID ~g~ erra ee , Decking E7018, SMAW & 6022 SMAW ~~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING/H.S. BOLTING INSPECTION 9-2-97 Observation of certified welders performing FCAW-SMAW during ongoing SSW at mezzanine joist top and bottom chord tie angle from line #AG to line R. Progressing from line 1 to line 6.2. Also, deck plug welding ongoing with shake out of decking at roof level only from line H to line A. A-325, high strength bolting ongoing torquing at mezzanine framing, from line A to line R between lines 1 & 6.2. UT testing of moment frame, full penns this am. No rejections. Ok to place top continuity plate at moment frames. Visually inspected welds for location, length, size, contour. Found no rejectable flaws. JKM 9-11-97 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale _...-.. ~ - CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE //0(//o, w I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSP. CTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ..,,_i"""'1...,,-..M '-"r l<t:.\,,::,l~IC:l<CU 11,.v,--~.._1u1<e; ~--OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. J REGEIVEO Si? 2 91991{ Wyman -Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 1?t1~R~araday Ave. NC97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 5 197 ~"fi9.W§0 1{v~ri~e ~ 's~ttJ¼'f · I PLAN FILE NO. A~TR. MAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) ~CHITECTth D enne • Smith DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. :A'.j1t'tR Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1!~~h<=ri'N~~Yi~lruction <gil~N~&~1_D WORK ¥/yman Testing Laboratories ULTRASONIC TESTING 9-2-97 Performed ultrasonic tests for soundness of full penetrati_on welds of moment connections utilizing a sonic mark I ultrasonic scope with a 2.25 mhz transducer set at 70 degrees shearwave with 2dbcf/52dbrl/68dbsl. All welds were tested in accordance with the AWS Dl.1. Mezzanine level Roof level lines 3.6 at P pass Lines 3.6 at P pass I " 3.6 at N.5 (E/W) pass 3.6 at N.5 (E/W) pass. 3.6 at N (E/W) pass 3.6 at N (e/w) pass. 3.6 at ATM·(e/w) pass 3.6 at M ( e/w) pass. 3.6 at L.5 pass 3.6 at L.5 pass. CLS 09-10-97 Signed copy on file. Earl Simon CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ~'-J~ Ut-1<c:s:,1.;,,l:;l~l:U 11"11;:,,-c:"IUI~ -OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DA1E OF REPO!~I REGis,rn NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS OWNER OR PROJECT NAME CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE st uction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER t e Draheim teel Deckin LAB FIELD WELDING/H.S. BOLTING INSPECTION 8-29-97 oratories Observation of certified welders performing FCAW, SMAW welding of structural steel at: 1. Ongoing roof opening framing fillet welding lines 6 thru 8 from J to A lines. 2. 2nd level floor framing outside of serpentine wall@ lines 3.5 to 3.8 from L to N. . 3. Torquing of A325 high strength bolting at roof framing exterior wall lines from 5-R to G.8-2 point.6 4. Roof deck layout ongoing from 3 line to 6 line D thru 'J. JKM 9-09-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DAIE OF REPORT Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING OWNER OR PROJECT NAME BLDG. PERMIT N(?. DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-28-97 (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING mith 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER 7 teel Deckin s Observation of certified welders and inspection of FCAW, SMAW welding at following locations. 1. Moment frame full penetration weld@ roof line framing point L.5. This completes the full penn. Welding at the moment frame weldments and U.T. has been scheduled for these connections. 2. Roof opening framing is on going at lines 6 to 7 to 8 from J to E lines using fillet welds and ongoing to A line. 3. Draheim steel is on site this a.m. shaking out, and laying out the 22 gauge roof decking starting@ point 2-E, certified welder is plug welding only as needed to lay out. Visually inspected welds for location, length, size, found no cracking, over lap or undercut. Other flaws are within allowable AWSDl.l. JKM 9-09-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE OF REPORI Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER JOB ADDRESS N097-Q9 l FOR WEEK ENDING Au us t 2 9 199 7 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. 962041 ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith- SOURCE OR MFGR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR amann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK · ra Steel Testin Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-27-97 Observation and inspection of ongoing filed welding of roof openings framing at locations: section J-N & 6-7 & 7-8, points 5.5@ N.6, 6.5@ N.6. Also, roof curtain wall framing at exterior walls south side at wall lines, serpentine wall from H to M. Note: At point E-4, the W2lx44 to weld tab and weld tab to embedded weld plate is complete this date. JKM 9-09-97 Signed copy on file. Rockla CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE oF REPORT Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER N0.97-091 ENDING Au ust 29 1997 BLDG. PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE NO. 962041 ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER R2H En ineerin DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR a ann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK ·erra Steel Erectors LAB FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-26-97 Laboratories Observation and visual inspection of ongoing FCAW, SMAW, fillet welding at the following locations: Channel to embed weld plate at roof framing at 2 line from F.5 to G.8. Note: at point E-4, the W21x44, to weld tab is not complete. Also the moment frame connect@ roof@ point L.5 is not complete. Roof opening framing@ areas A.5-4.5, A.5-5.5 C.9-5.5, D.1-4.6, E.1-5.6, G.5-5.6, 5.3-J.8 K.5 L.1. Roof line framing@ W2lx44 to weld plate@ 2 line@ E. Visually inspected welds for location, length, size, found no rejectable defects. JKM 9-09-97 Signed copy on file. Rock CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. · DATE OF l~EPORT Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-25-97 (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Observation and visual inspection of certified welders performing fillet welds vertical uphill on beam weld flanges to embedded weld plates at the following 2nd level framing, 2 line at points D, E, F 1 line at points C, B Also at point 4-E and between lines 3 & 3.5 from A.5 to B.5. Also fillet welding of roof openings framing, horizontal positioning at locations N to N2.5 from line 4 to 5.2, 4.2 at L.8, 3.5 to 4.2 H to J, A to D.1-3, E.5 to F.5@ 2.5 line. Visually inspected welds for porosity, cracking, overlap, undercut, correct location, size, length. All welds complied within UBC, AWS D1.1. All flaws within allowable ranges. JKM 9-09-97 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DAfE OF REPORT Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 I PLAN FILE NO. t(~~~~th D. Smith DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) G.ENERAL CONJ:,'<ACTO~ t , Hamann ~ons~ruc ion E71Tll FCAW, E7018 SMAW Steel bar j~ist/girders ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-22-97 Visual inspection of ongoing field welding of ASTM A36, A500 structural steel and steel bar girders, joists using FCAW, SMAW welding procedures. Joist to girder/beam placement on going from line E to line A 2nd level floor. Roof level framing secondary beam at 3.9 line at points L & K including knife plate girder ties. 2nd level floor framing erection from E line to point 3.8/K Wl6x26 to weld plate as per 3-SD.9. 2 line at G to H line 2nd level floor C12x30 ledger channel. K:!LS 08-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Rockland Dale ,...-"1 ~ Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED AP PROV AL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE f'~1s'Rf!~raday Ave. NC97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 197 F~~~81a:':f0 :K~~fitl~ ~~(f~1TNO. I PLAN FILE NO. A~fli· ~3tg;PEA~6~-ETC.) 'ieCHITECTth D enne • Smith ~1t)1Gli1§1sGTH I SOUr:ff R~~1f8: elect. ~(i;ll),JfR , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'l (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1f.NERAL CONE,ACTO~ t , amann ons rue ion E71Tll FCAW, E7018 SMAW fill TR. DOIN~ POR:f D EiORK t ierra ee rec ors ~~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-21-97 Observe and visually inspect fit-up and welding for correct size, length, location, and technique. Certified welders performing fillet welds at the following locations: 2nd floor between lines 6 thru 6.5 and lines P thru P.5 and points 6.2@ L & L.5, J, K. 4 line @ points K,L also Chevron braces this location, note that the W2l's detail 10-SD.8 are not welded here. 3.8 @ L, Kasper 3-SD.9. ' Also joist to girder/beam at 2nd level complete from R line to E line. NOTE at locations P & 6.2 the inside weld tabs of TS to wide flange beam at 3 locations are not complete. Also W to weld plate embed at point N & 6.3 is not complete. Visually inspected welds for any defects, found none, outside of allowable by Dl.l. t!LS 08-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. · ,,.f-ockl~ Dale /~ {) ( G~ () /Jw<;c__u1a :,1<..::,NAIUl<t: '-'• """''-''~"~~ 11~.;,r't:I...IVI< Wyman Testing 'Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~1§DRF\~.raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 197 f~~~a%i.,0Avl"e11tl'e E'g~ff§ffTNO. I PLAN FILE NO. i-i's'1?}!f ~1$1:PEA~Ota'=· ETC.) -teCHITECTth D enne • Smith '7C01G'.Jl::['p~GTH I S0Ufff R'&~Ff8: electri, ~Gl~!eR dh . • t ~ Ji Ran ua & Associa es DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) tf,NERAL CONEACT01f:. t . amann ons rue ion NR211 E71Tll FCAW <sr'gr~~N'=s't~JlD~~ictors E7018 SMAW W~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-20-97 Observation and visual inspection of ongoing field welding using FCAW, SMAW at the following locations: Moment frame weldments at roof line framing was completed this date with the exception of 1 connection at point L.5. 2nd level floor framing. · Moment frame weldments complete at NOTE: Continuity plates at top flang·e have yet would like UT performed prior to these welds. Joist placement ongoing at 2nd level floor. CLS 09-03-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. to be placed, Sierra Steel /)R~~d D<:_le Ir t JV. JC\c;:; -->l'->NAIUl<I: Uf "~~--Ef~ElJ 11\1->t"t:<....lOR DATE oF l?EPORI Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~jgD~&raday Ave. N(97-Q91 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 -07 f~~£a~~0 t~e~M~ 'g~ Q~fflT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. A§~· ~~p~~d~· ETC.) l{iCHITECTth D enne • Smith lytilGl!~~GTH I SOU'.Ef R~~Ti!l elect. ~GINfR , J~ Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ff.NERAL CONaACTO~ t , amann ons rue ion NR233 E71Tll FCAW ffiNTR. DOIN~PORfD ioRK t ierra ee rec ors E7018 SMAW wtman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-19-97 PAGE 1 OF 2 Observed certified welders performing * moment connections at points. full penetration groove welds at Roof level M-3.6 west side, L.5-3.2 both sides 2nd floor 3. 7-P west side, 3.5-N.5 both sides 3.5-N both sides, 3.6-M both sides, 3.7-L.5 east side. These are top & bottom beam flanges welded to column flanges with backing plates. *Fillet welds at wide flange beam, seats to embed weld plates at 2nd floor level at points D-7.3, P.6-7.2, P.6-7.5, *Als·o tube steel beam TS 2 Ox8x51 to wide flange beam W24x55 at area between lines P.1 to P.5 and 6.2 to 6.5. *Also joist to girder or beams at area between lines 6 & 7 and N & R, 3 & 5 and N & R, N & Mand 3 & 6.5. CLS 08-25-97 Signed copy on file. Rockland Dale pg. 1 /) ..,.---,. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE /< a V h O /J.ws C~T! I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ;:,1-=,1~AIUl<t: vr 1<c\.:>1c,lt:t<t:U IN->l"'t:<...,101~ OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & 8 / 9 9 () SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE oritrPC>RT . . ~ . . . .. .. :,._.., .. .... · ~ _ .. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ff1§D~~raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 197 FE!'.~~a~,0 i~e11tl1e lg~ ()~1f1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, GRADE. ETC.) -recH1TEcrth D enne • Smith DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~GIN'e'R . J1 Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MATL (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ENERAL CONE,ACTO¥_ t . amann ons rue ion CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK ~man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION PAGE 2 OF 2 8-19-97 Weld rejection: Notice: tube steel beam TS 20x8x51 at point P.6 & 5 fillet weld to embed weld plate east vertical er outside radius vertical was welded using a all thread bar as a slug. Tl1.is fabrication is not in compliance with ANSI/AWS D1.1-2.13, 5.22.3, 5.22 2.13.2. Filler plates 1/4" or larger. -S.2.2.3. Spacers used will be of same material as the base metal. 5.22 tolerance of joint dimensions. Repair as per AWS D1.1-5.15-1.2 and cs.10.2. CLS 08-25-97 Signed copy on file. RoJ15land ~e CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE , 1r () ({ A Y d.WS~~~~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF. JHE. ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS ..,. '--..,;,1-.;;:,;;,i...,./-'\IVI'(._ \,,Jr ,{t:bl::>lc.1<CU ll'h~I-L""'IUI< OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ' --·"..,,.,-,.N--""" ___ , ... -~---,._,. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ffljgoRF&raday Ave. N(97-09 l I FOR WEEK ENDING August 22 197 ~~!f~a~f0 !.~~tl1e ~~{)~1ITNO. I PLAN FILE NO. A~IJ!· ~tgi;tPEA<s'Otcf · ETC.) fflCHITECTth D enne • Smith ~FolG'.ft:f:'p~GTH j sou~lB~~'f8: elect 2-\'.<oll-J£=R • Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ~NERAL CONBACTO~ t . amann ons rue ion E7018 SMAW, E71Tll FCAW <gjNTR. DOIN~POR'.J:D WORK ierra ee ~man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-18-97 Observed and inspected ongoing field welding using SMAW and FCAW at beam to column weld flanges @ roof framing points J + N-7,also beam bolting tab to embed at point N-8. Also girder seat to embed at point 7 + N.6 using sheets D4 details 9, SDS-11, SD9-12 also N + J-6 roof line, L.5-6 knife plate girder to girder tie. NOTE: Contractor erecting TS+ WFB@ floor framing area lines 6-7 + R-N. Observed certified welders performing fillet welds, visually inspected welds for location, size, length, observed no cracking, overlap, inclusions, or other defects. Also inspected dry packing of column bases this packed with site mix 50% cement, 50% #3 sand. date all' locations were fully CLS 08-25-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ~klan~le I~ 0 ~ )q tJ_ A lU:SC..'-U.T -"''-'l'l/-\lUl<t: V~ "~'-''~lt:l<t:U 11~->.-<:'-'IVI< RECEWEO AUS 2 5 1997 Wyman Testing · Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER JOB ADDRESS e. NC97-Q91 FOR WEEK August 15 1 q7 ENDING 9 PLAN FILE NO. SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER , R2H Engineering GENERAL CONT,aACTOR , Hamann construction COC'JTR. DOING ,Ef;PORTE;D WORK Sierra ~teeL ~rector&- LAB W man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-15-97 Inspected the fit-up and welding of the W18x40 beam to W14x68 column connections. These are top and bottom beam flanges welded to column flanges, using complete penetration welds, with back-up bar. Welds were made at lines- N-3.5 top & bottom flange, each side of column-roof level, lines-M-3.6.top & bottom flange, south side of colum~-roof level, lines N.5='3.5 top & bottom .flange north. side of column-2nd floor, per details-3/SD-7, 5/SD.7. The 5/16 11 inch cover plate-per detail 14/SD-7 has not been welded to the W18x40 beams, top flanges yet. Inspected the fit-up and welding of the 6 11 x6 11 xl/211 tube steel braces, to the one inch plate, and the l0-#8x811 -011 A706 reinforcing steel bars to the one inch plate, per details-A/SD-8,3/SD-8. Welds were made using FCAW-E71T-8 electrode for fillet welds, flare bevel welds, and single bevel-complete penetration welds. Inspection was continuous and work complies with the approved plans and specifications . . ... . ·~·--~. '•• .· .. :•. ~~: ·_. :· . -:; ... : .. -... : :· -. .. : . . . ;,: ·--~. ; -. . .. ... ..... ·-. ~. ~; ; '·: ·: =-·, ., . -• •• • ' • ... • • •• ~ :_: ,·:., ~ J ' '--· ·-' .· _!.·)·:·.)·.>:.-.;· 1:1.,;~;;,f.~.·:.·, • • ;· ' ••• , : ,. q ... :; :· _ .. _ .... :; :: "": • . . .. ' ·.. . .. . . . ~; ... ---... .. ·. . .: -::: ', --.: ·.-.-. -. ,-.. ', .... ·:·. -.. .. .' ... ' .. 'JKM 8-18-97 .. Signed copy on file. Stephen Flores .• I,, CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ... :_ . ; . : -:... • ··; t :~: • RECElVEO AUG 2 5 ' , Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH O REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL O PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE INSPECTOR OF O REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H .. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER JOB ADDRESS N(97-Q9 l FORWEEK August 15 lq7 ENDING 9 SOURCE OR MFGR. PLAN FILE NO. ARCHITECT h Kennet D. Smith ENGINEER R2H Engineering GENERAL CONTRACTO~ Hamann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORT!;D WORK Sierra Steei Erectors--,- LAB W an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-14-97 Inspected the fit up and welding of the Wl8x40 beam to W14x68 cols connection at lines P-3.7, top and bottom north side of column, lines N.5-3.5 top and bottom, north and south side of column, these 2 locations are at the roof level. Also inspected the fit-up and welding of the Wl8x40 beam to W14x68 column connections at lines L.5-3.5-2nd floor i~vel south side of column, lines M-3.6-2nd floor level north and south side of column. Welds were made using FCAW-E71T-8. Electrodes for fillet welds and single bevel-full penetration welds by certified welders-per details-8/SD-7, 7/SD-7, 5/SD-7, 3/SD-7. The 5/16 inch thick cover plate is not per detail-14/SD-7. The cover plate is 5/16"x7"x12" inches, the 1/4" fillet is along the edge of the Wl8x40 beam-bottom flange. The cover plate at the top beam flange has not been installed yet. Inspection was continuous and except for changed dimensions of the cover plate, work complies with the approved plans and specifications. JKM 8-18-97 Signed copy on file. Stephen Flores CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~~~~~S~~~~ THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL.OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS SPECIFICATIONS, ~~~1¥Mg~~~ 1~g;fb~~ ro COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ... ·. . .. 1 c eol'f /<J :2T113-f..s r~EGIS(ER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE 0 NDT O OTHER JOB ADDRESS N97-Q91 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FORWEEK August 8 ENDING PLAN FILE NO. f€i'i'ii~th D. Smith ENS?l~EEJ?. , , R~tt t;ngineering GENERAL CON:WACTOli! • irders Hamann construction csqNTR. DOING...J<,EPOR't!:D WQRK I _., B . 11 ) ierra ~teei co, nc. ·, i LAB W man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-6-97 (2 welders: AWS certified, Steve Senatores & Grant Cody) 19 Observed and visually inspected the continuous filed welding of the o.w joist to the truss girders & ledger angle. Started the erection of the bar joists @ grids J thru N, between #2 thru #4 grids. Installed Wl8x35 beam@ grids J between 2 & 4 lines. Erected & bolted the pipe col. @· 4 & J lines. Erected the W/F beams and bar joists & girders, R & S lines & between 3 thru 6 lines. Bar joists to concrete panel per SD-5/1 (3/16" fillet, 3" (2) sides, girder to col. per SD-5/6, bar joist to girder per SD-5/5, 1/4" fillet (2) sides. Girder to panel per SD-5/11. (7/8 & 1-1/8) 325 high/strength bolting per SD4/1 (schedule). Beam to column connection per SD-4/2 & 5, 14, 15 & 16, To the best of my knowledge, u.n.o all welding in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Inspected welds for size, length, location. Observed welders for proper procedure and techniques. __ ....... ~ ,_ ~---~ ... JKM 18-:-\5~97. Signed copy on file, \ \ f:, C,ERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~~~~~~ CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS SPECIFlc1~,~~J~~~t1~Mg~~fE 1~~rYbi~~ To COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & ~ .... Robert Dickerson Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING N~7-Q9 l 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FORWEEK August ENDING PLAN FILE NO. 1-f~~W~th D. Smith 'R'2~EE~ng ineer ing 325 bolts d SMAW ~yman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-5-97 (2 welders: AWS certified, Steve Senatores, Grant Cody 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER Observed & visually inspected the continuous welding of the o.w bar joist to the girders & concrete panels embed plates, per SD-4/1, 6 & 9. Located@ grid lines J thru N.5 between grids #3 thru #6. Erected and bolted W/F beams @ the same locations. Erected T.S column & bolted to·the base plate@ grid 6 line intersected by 4 ·line, erected & welded the truss girder to the col, welded the bar joists to the girder the ledger angle on the concrete panels @ 2 line & E thru F ., Erected & welded bar between girders @ grids 4 thru 6 between E thru H. Bar joist to panel per SD-5/1, joist to girders SD-5/5, girder to column per SD-5/6. Inspected W/F beams connecting lugs, punched holes, for out of round burrs and paint and u.n.o, no defects found. Observed welder for proper procedure and technique. To the best of my knowledge, all completed welds are in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. JKM 8-:-.+5~$7 Signed copy on file. "'' -, . . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE s~~~~~sI~~r THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS SPECIFICATIQNSEADNI 'ltl~fpEp FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & . , i!J.,.... LICABLE SECTIONS. Robert Dickerson RS6S 20 AUS 2 6 1997 Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING O SHOTCRETE D NDT D OTHER JOB ADDRESS N<97-Q91 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FoRWEEK August ENDING PLAN FILE NO. f~~~~th D. Smith EN~Ll'l/EEE, • Ritt J!;ngineering GENERAL CONWACTOr,1 • Hamann construction CO.NTR. DOING.J<,EPORT,l:D ~ORK I -+B . l l ) Sierra ~teeL co, nc ,· i LAB • Wyman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-4-97 (2 welders: Steve Senatores & Grant Cody (AWS Certified) 19 Observed and visually inspected the continuous field welding of the o.w joist to the o.w truss girders & W/F beams, located between grids #2 thru #6 & A thru J, beam to column connection per SD-4/5 & 2, beam to beam det.1, beam to panel conn. dets 6 & 9. Girder to panel per SD-5/11. Bar joist to panel det.1, bar joist to girder det. 5 & 9. Welds are 3/16" & 1/4" fillets. Inspected the 325 1-l/8"x7 /8" bolts as they were taken from their containers·, checked the mill reports. Installation of the 325 high/strength bolts per SD- 4/1 schedule. Mill reports on file. To the best of my knowledge, all completed welding meets or exceeds the criteria set forth in the AWS. Dl .1 manual, sec. 2. 4, and all other applicable codes, plans and specifications. Observed welders for proper procedure and technique. JKM 8-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~rJ,~~~1,~~FiZ~~~itgx~i,~~:~ii~LTg~~i~~0J,~li~f~}/41'!}~~\c1tJi~ Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ii8-fgDR_pJ&raday Ave. N<:g7-09 l j FOR WEEK ENDING August 1 197 FWNER aR PRO!CT NAME ara ay venue '§-%~ 0E~y1r NO. I PLAN FILE NO. A~~msf':f:¥HB'tEu~R~'.I_E, §'tkel reCHITEC\:h enne D. Smith j~l;tJ tn-JNGTH I SOU§? OR MFGRSt l ierra ee fG,INER , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ~ENERAL CONCRACTOf t . amann ons rue ion IW/F beams & bar joists & girders BQNTR. DOIN1,tPOR:f D WORK ierra ee Electrodes: 7018 1/8" low/hyd. W'B . yman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 8-1-97 2 welders: Steve Senatore & Grant Cody AWS Observed & inspected (Visually) the erection & of the w21x44 welding w/f beams starting@ grids 1 & 2 between a & d per sheet 3 of erection drawings 1/4" fillet welds sides, ( 3) W2lx44 to connection plate; also see SD-4/9A. Welded o.w joists to girders & ledger angle per SD-5/1 & 5 & 9 welded girders to columns, per sd/-5/6 girder to concrete panel per sd-5/11 location of work @ grid lines A thru G between 1 thru 4 see sheet S3. All completed welds meet or exceed the criteria set forth in the AWS Dl.1-96 manual & all other applicable codes, otherwise no discrepancies found. plans, & specifications & unless noted ~11 high/strength 3/4" & 7/8" (325) bolting per SD-4/1 fastener schedule. Inspection of welds for size, length, & location, observed welders for proper procedures and techniques. CLS 08-05-97 -·--· -.. :-~ · Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED.ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS: Robert Dickerson • Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 00THER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ii81'BD~!raday Ave. N<B)7-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING August 1 97 Fa'.:r~8~ V0.if~~ttt:~ ~g~ Q~~IT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) ~CHITECt.h D enne • Smith DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~GINtER , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) If.NERAL CO~ACTO~ , amann ons ruction S~TR. DOIN<§~PORfD WORK erra ee ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-31-97 Provided visual inspection of the welding of single pass fillet welds on joists to ledger and roof joists to joist girder and girder to column at grids 7 to 8 from grids E to N. Welding in progress and area mentioned all !welds were not totally complete. Unless otherwise noted work observed to plans and specifications. ~ . ·' • • • • f' • ,~ icLS 08-05-97 ... · Signed copy on file. Charles Bryan ~ I\ - CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE \JMnUV) 1Z 01.Jfuh I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS l::if(:;Nl',IUl<c vr "~=•~•~"~~ 11'1.~-,.,'/:JT.UI< OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SEC}'IONS. Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING N<::g7-091 BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE PLAN FILE NO. ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER • • R2H En 1.neer1.ng GENERAL CONTRACTOR Hamann Construction CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Steel. LAB w an Testin Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-30-97 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Visually inspected the field welding of the joist to girder conn. per detail 5 on sheet SD-5. Note: @ this time just the joist to girder conn. is welded not the 6X3Xl/4 PL on top & only one side@ the roof framing@ line 7. JKM 8-06-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Wyman Testing · Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~jgD"FAraday Ave. N(97-Q91 I FOR WEEK ENDING JULY 18 07 ~~~!a~1°i~~~ti'e 1§-%~ 0E~11r No. I PLAN FILE NO. §~~~J.:"1AT'L (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) ,recHITECth D enne • Smith §'elGt{§lfNGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~CclNfR , Ji Randhua & Associate~ DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) rf;NERAL CON~ACTOi t , amann ons rue ion E71Tll electrode FCAW EfrTR, DOIN~PORJ:D WORK erra ee ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-14-97 Visually inspected the field welding in the following locations: Welding of gusset to angle ledgers dated 4-26-97. at panel P-16 per detail from engineer Welding of top panel connection of panels 5 dated 4-97. & 6 per detail 3/SK from engineer Certified welders were observed for proper techniques. welding procedures and Completed welds were inspected for size, length, visible defects. CLS 07-29-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED All OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. location and were free of Ron Calkins ~~!'~:~ SIGNAlURE 0~ REGISTERED INSPEClUI~ :Z; ~gE-;;j'r? REGl~~ofuR Wyman Testing Laboratories · (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 0 FIREPROOFING 0 NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAB FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-11-97 0 SHOTCRETE 0 OTHER on site this a.m. to perform field welding inspection and observation of on going roof ledger framing connections@ tilt up panel concrete joint of panel #5 15 thru 29 complete@ 11:00 30 thru 33 at end of ~ar. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds comply with project plans and specification and are within the requirements of Dl.l structural steel welding code. Crew size: 3 welders, 0 fitters. JKM 7-28-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & (} f) SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ~Afu & lif PORT Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-11-97 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Field welding inspection of ongoing fillet welding of tilt up panels, to footings , tilt up panels. At panel to footing P-6. At panel to panel floor ledger P-49, P-13, P-15, P-16 and along 8 line@ 4x4 angle splices at panel to panel roof ledger P-13, P-15, P-16. At point 1 & C.5 at floor ledger angle instructed Sierra Steel to remove excess concrete to allow correct fit up of member. -Inspected installation of Hilti KB-11 at roof panel to wall panels@ vault and at panel #P 6 to footing. JKM 7-28-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & 9 n SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. :::S/4 fu REP6RT Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING PLAN FILE NO. CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAB FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-10-97 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Observation of ongoing FCAW of tilt up concrete wall panels at roof ledger panels 33, P-1, P-2, P-47, P-48, P-49. At Floor Ledger Panel P-15, P-16. At roof ledger 4"x4"x3/8 angle splices in mid-panels at panels P33. At point A.6 detail 9, SD-4@ 28' AFF steel beam to concrete panel weld tab. complete. NOTE: Panel joint connection at point A.1@ roof ledger. See memo this date. JKM 7-28-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & '""7 fu O ~ ~ SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. · ·.-'-?,.4-,.L,,~......,,;;:......'"'--,-., __ /;,..-D EOFR o . -. . . . -· ... ·...:. _._ ... ·-.... . -. ·-····-"-. ·-. . ..... · ·-· . Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~.!s0 ~!raday Ave. Nc.97-091 I ~~~1i!EK JULY 11 Q7 E"~~a&f0 :JW1eMt1e ~g'2 Q'g<~IT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. §£'Eli'Ef]_MAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) faCHITEC'th D enne • Smith _gijlGt(~fj_ENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~rfRRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ~n°"t!Afi.Wfruction E71Tll electrode f J:.~'r g_o1~~fffTED WORK Wyman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELJJIN~ INSPECTION 7-8-97 Visually inspected the field welding in the following locations: plate connections at panel joints at panels 43,44,45, 26,27,28, Welding of and panel #40 to panel #20 per detail 15/SD9. - Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. CLS 07-23-97 _Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Ron Calkins -~ /"~ /.d>v SIGNATURE OF Rl::GISTl::1,1::lJ INSPECTOR 7-B-?? ~ /2._ DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER --·-· .·. --··· _ ... ...... · .. :. _. . • ... · .. : Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~1§D'"F~raday Ave. N(97-09 l I FOR WEEK ENDING JULY 11 97 ~~l1!&a~,O*~Te~~'e 1gg~ o~YIT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. 5i:~~yv1AT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) WCHITECth D enne • Smith §~IG!{§!f NGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. irGINlER , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) f.rcNERAL CON(!.ACTO{ t , amann ons rue ion E71Tll electrode EflNTR. DOIN<s~PORfD WORK ierra ee W§'man Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-7-97 Visually inspected the field welding of plate connections at panel panels 41 & 42 and 36 & 37 per detail 8/SD6. joints at Certified welders were observed for proper welding techniques. procedures and Completed welds were free of visible defects and the approved plans and specifications. CLS 07-24-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. in accordance with Ron Calkins - ~ATORE~~INSPECTOR ·. _ _. __ .. . : ' .... -. ·-:. ·. ;_. _ _. . . . . . . . . .. }.· Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED AP PROV AL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i0tfgDR_p'~raday Ave. N'97-Q91 I FOR WEEK ENDING JULY 4 Y!J7 :fi?WNER aR PROf CT NAME BLDG. PERMIT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. ara ay venue 962091 $~~~lMAT'L (TYPE. GRADE. ETC.) ARCHITECT Kenneth D. Smith §'61GI{:§lfNGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. EN~ll'JEER , AJit Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) fiENERAL CONTRACTOR , amann Construction E71Tll electrode FCAW §ONTR. DOING ~PORf=D WORK ierra See W'yman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-3-97 !Visually inspected the field welding of hold downs at panels 3,4,6,36,37,41,42,47,48, & 49 per details 1/SDl0, 5/SO6r 6/8D6. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. - t!LS 07-23-97 Signed copy on file. Ron Calkins CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ~ e~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. w1\:::7NAIUl'(C \,..Ir 11:t:~l~lt:l<t:U 11~.~wa;;...,.IUl'C 6/2- REGISTER NUMBER . ~··· ... ---·-.-.. -··--·-·· .. ··-. . ......... ~ Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~0~lr~day Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING JULY 4 97 FWNER8R PROfCT NAME ara ay venue ~lg~· o'9<rlT NO. I PLAN FILE NO. §!lffi.iMAT'L (TYPE, GRADE. ETC.) ~CHITECth D enne • Smith §'s''G.f{§'fNGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~GIN'f:ER , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) gENERAL CO~ACTO~ t , amann ons rue ion lASTM A36 Steel §ONTR. DOIN<~{~PORiED WORK ierra ee E71Tll electrode FCAW Wyman Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 7-2-97 ~isually inspected the field welding of hold downs at panels 10,38,39 & 40 1/SDl0, 5/SD6 1 per details 6/SD6. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. - Completed welds were inspected for size, length, lwith the approved plans and specifications. CLS 07-23-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. location and in accordance Ron Calkins /4::. ~ SIGNATURE OF~NSPECTOI~ ?~Z-'?? 6/2- DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NOMsm Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -f~1~Rf~raday Ave. NC97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 16 197 ~tf ~Wf0 ~'1~t{t:fe 8g~ (f!1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. ~,!lt18P-c~'c:1· <c~~~E?te ~CHITECTth D enne • Smith Sl,Eff(j"QSTRENGTH I sou~~fW:tro/Sloan ~~iffE'.Eng ineer ing DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) <rfNERAL CONEACTOl t . amann ons rue ion Mix design #6-578 1fiNTR. DOIN,!.EPOR1tD wot. amann ons rue ion ~~an Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-16-97 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation of panel #P-3A, P-3B & P-6 per detail 1,6 on SD2, 1,3 on SDlO. detail 1,7F,8,11 on SD3, 1,9,16 on SD4, 7 on SD8, 8 on SD9 Inspected the placement and consolidation of 280 cubic yards of concrete, mix design #6-578 in the following panels P-1, P-2, P-3A, P-3B, P4A, P-4B, P-6, P-31, P-32, P-46, P-50, FVP-1, FVP-2, DP-1, DP-2, RBP-1, RBP- 3, RBD-4, P-5A, P-SB. 2 sets of 4 test cylinders were cast by A.C. CLS 06-5-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Da;91: ~;~a~ (/~----~-- ."''l::'.'""'Ul~I: ur-,~1:<,;1::;1c:, :~D """''·c:...,;1u1< Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING JOB ADDRESS OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Farada Avenue CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) Reinforced Concrete DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR. 4000 Nelson- DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) NO. BLDG. PERMIT NO. ARCHITECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Mix Desi n #6-578 CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAB w CONCRETE TECHNICIAN INSPECTION 5/16/97 Sampled and tested 280 cubic yards of concrete on the following location: panel #s -Pl, P2, P3A, P4A, P4B, P6, P31, P32, P46, FVPl, FVP2, PPl, DP2, RBPl, RBP2, RBP3, RBD4, P5A, P5B. Set 1 of 4 concrete test cylinders were taken from panel P32. Slump 5", truck #321, ticket #623047. Set 2 of 4 concrete test cylinders were taken from panel #P4A. Slump 5- 1/2", truck #317, ticket #623055. DMR 06-05 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -P~J~R,~raday Ave. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 16 197 ~If ~81a_P§-0 ~~~&1t1re B9°6:lcf~1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. _i~TS· ;"'A§-J1c,Fcj(fRt,§1H<eoncrete ~CHITECTth D enne • Smith ~~l'Yif(fE~lj: I s0 u'Ne t13~fri s 1 oan E_ll21ffE~ngineering DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1:fNERAL CONEACTO!i:_ . amann ons ruction A615 reinforcing steel, 3000 PSI cone 1:fiNTR. DOlo/,fEJS'RJJD woia amann • avi son ~an Testing Laboratories CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-15-97 Inspected the placement of 3,000 PSI concrete for the following panels 10,ll,12,13,34,35,38,39,30,41,42,43,44,45,47,48,49,7,8,9,LOP-l FVP-3. Also inspected the placement of A615 reinforcing steel for panels Pl,P2, P4, P4A, P31, 32, 46,50,FVP-l,FVP-2,DP-l,DP-2,RBP-l,2,3,4,P5A,P5B,P6, per details 7D/SD.3, 7F/SD.3, 8C/SD.3, 8C/SD.3, lC/SD.6, lB/SD.6, 8/SD.3, 1/SD.2, 1/SD.3, 8B/SD.3, 9/SD.3, 1/SS.5, 3/SD.10. Inspection for concrete was continuous. Test samples were made for concrete, also slump tests and temperature tests. Work complies with the approved plans and specifications. ' ' CLS 05-27-97 Signed copy on file. Stephen Flores ,., CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE . ~Ah'J /JY h0/A}--I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS /"''=''"'"'.'Ul(C vr J<t:{:;J::ilt:l(t:U "->r-C'-,IVI< OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS woRK ro coMPLY w1TH THE APPROVED PLANS & _ ~ -Y, ~ q 1 :# 1 t):; 7--; /'? Pr SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. '-'"o.:-·rfo"rc;!oRf IC Bo REG!STE~BER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE · REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -f~13°Rfiraday Ave. NC97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING May 16 1'fJ7 }rWNER ~t PRO'ACT NAME ara ay venue B9~2 'cfi1T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. ,A'?;l~-,MAg'~PE fftfA~. E,ld and cone. fCHITECTth D enne • Smith ~ES1~1c)l)RE~<§:I: , I SOURCE OR MFGR. 'B'.~'fIEE:Eng ineer ing DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) yf;NERAL CON~ACTOft t , amann ons rue ion A615 grade 60 and 40 J?1NTR. DOING Rl:PORTE1stORKl/H / J L regressive ee amann • - 3,000 PSI concrete ~~an Testing Laboratories Davidson CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-13-97 (1 hour) Rebar reinspect ion for missing reinforcement per 5-5-97 spec. Inspector report (memo). All missing rebars were installed.observe~ that A706, grade 60 were used instead of A615, grade 40 (per plan). This.was approved by Ajit Randhava (structural engineer) see faxed noteby him(attached) 6.5 hours) Continuously inspected placement of 400 cubic yards of 3,000 ~SI concrete into 20 panels and 6 additional sections (compressor shed) as follows: panels #14 thru #29, 33,36,37,40 and CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-4, DP-3, and DP-4 (not on plans, added by engineer). Four sets of 4 cylinders were made at the following location & concrete intervals: Panel #27 @ approx. 90 cubic yards, slump =6-3/4"; Panel 24@ approx. 160 cubic yards, slump =6"; panel #18@ approx. 270 cubic yards, slump =5"; Panel #40 @ approx. 350 cubic yards, slump =5". Results of slump tests were reported to contractor and addition of water to concrete was controlled for remainder of concrete. (2 hours) Inspected rebars for panels #12,13,11,38,39,41,42,43,44, & 45. Size, grade, lap, clearances & location all conformed to plans and specifications, except for slab dowels (approved by Engineer) to be A706, grade 60. CLS 05-29-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Hossein F. Sarkani · .. -·-·· .. ·. . · ... ·. . _ _.,.. Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF JOB ADDRESS 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY NO. 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING BLDG. PERMIT NO. SOURCE OR MFGR. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) ASTM A6 LAB REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION 5/5/97 (619) 675-0270 0 FIREPROOFING D NDT 0 D/B ANCHORAGE FOR WEEK ENDING 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for tilt-up panels #1 and #2, 14 thru 40, per details l,3,7/SD3, 1 & 2, 15, 19/SD2, 14/SD3, l/SD6, 11/SDS, 9/SD4 of the approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearances. Embedded items in place except for metal ledgers. (Note: Panels not complete. Check memo for items missing and call for reinspection.) To the best of my knowledge, Work inspected is in accordance with approved plans and specifications. DMR 06-05 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. ) ' 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS --~1=6~7~5--=F=ARAD==A=Y,__,,_,A~V~E=NU=E~,_,,,CA=R=L=S=B=AD=-z...,_CA=L=IF~O=RN=-=-I=A=------- CONTRACTOR -----=HAMANN====-~C=O=N=S~T=R=U=C=T=I=O=N.__ ________________ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _K=E=NN=E=T=H=-=D:........::S=M=I~T=H.,,___,&,,___,,_A=S=S=O=C~-~-/~R=2=H'----""E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=IN=G=-------- TO BE BILLED ---~HAMANN==~-C~O=N=S~T=R=U~C=T=I~O=N~----------------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [?{] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON MIX DESCRIPTION NIA MIX NUMBER 602 SLUMP 511 TYPE CEMENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ----"1~0~-~0~1~-~9~7 __ _ TICKET NUMBER ----~1=7-4=6~2=---- TIME IN MIXER -----6~5~M=I=N~--- ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 AIR CONTENT ~------N~/~A~---- DESIGN STRENGTH 3250 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT MEZZANINE DECK BTWN LN J AND R. 6.2 AND 3.5 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS __________________ _ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f 1 c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY -------=R=-=·--=D=A=L=E ____ _ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=N~/A=---- LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 7 33 10-08-97 6 X 12 28.27 80,000 2830 28 34 10-29-97 6 X 12 28.27 97,000 3430 28 35 10-29-97 6 X 12 28.27 100,000 3540 H 36 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ________________________ _ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With REVIEWED BY: ti! ~t' DATE· //-t:;-f::z ASTM Standard Designations · /4 C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS 1675 FARADAY AVENUE. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR _____ HAMANN=~~-C=O~N-S-TR_U_C-T=I~ON~----------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER -=K=ENN=E=T=H=-=D~S=M=I~T=H::........:,:&~A=S=S=O=C~-~l=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N=G.__ _____ _ TO BE BILLED -----'HAMANN=-==-==-~C=O=N=S=T=R=U=C=T=I=O=N ________________ _ BLDG. ,PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF LR] CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER ------~N=E=L=S=O=N:......=S=L=O=AN=--- MIX DESCRIPTION ___ 6=-=S=K=------ MIX NUMBER -----~6~0~2 ______ _ SLUMP -------~5~"------- TYPE CEMENT -------=N=l~A-=-------- PLACEMENT DATE ____ 0=9~-~3~0~-~9~7 __ _ TICKET NUMBER ----~1~7~4=1=5..._ __ _ TIME IN MIXER _____ 6~0~M=I=N-__ _ ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 AIR CONTENT -----=N~/=A ________ _ UNIT WEIGHT NIA DESIGN STRENGTH ---~3=2=5~0 ____ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT -MEZZANINE DECK BTWN LN JANDA. 5 AND 1 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY _____ R-._D=A=L=E __ _ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -~N~/A~--- LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE FIELD LAB DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NO. TESTED INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 7 29 10-07-97 6 X 12 28.27 78,000 2760 28 30 10-28-97 6 X 12 28.27 111,000 3930 28 31 10-28-97 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 4000 H 32 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER. ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR. CITY, SUPPLIER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: //-?,-9 Z C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 : ·-. .. . } ' (MAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST TECT -------=T=H=E=----=:I=R=I=S--=GR=O=-U=P;:..._ __ _ PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 97-091 fECT ADDRESS ___ 1~6~7~5~F~ARA=~D~A~Y-=AVE=N~U~E~,~C~AR=L~S~B~A~D~,--=CAL=I~F~O~R=N=I=A~------ ~RA~TOR ----~HAMAN==~N.:........!::C~O~N~S~T~R~UC~T~I~O~N:..:._ _______________ _ ~ITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING 3E BILLED HAMANN CONSTRUCTION 3. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA JRT OF I.Kl CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER PLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ___ __,;;:0=5_-~1~6_-~97 ____ _ DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER ----~6=2=3=0=55=---- NUMBER -----~6~5~7~8'-------TIME IN MIXER ----~4~1;_.;.::M=IN=---- MP --------=5'----"'1~/~2~"-----ADMIXTURE ------~N~/=A;-._ ___ _ E CEMENT II AIR CONTENT -----=N~/=A ____ _ T WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH ____ 4~0~0~0"------- '.ATION OF PLACEMENT .. _ __::.;PA:.:N:1;E::!,.:L~P=--_:4=-=A=-------------------- ,.;, !CIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS _________________ _ 2UIRED STRENGTH{f'c} 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS 1PLES MADE BY A. COOLEY DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --~05~-~1=9~-~9~7- ~LD LAB ~NTITY NO. 7 25 28 26 28 27 H 28 DATE TESTED 05-23-97 06-13-97 06-13-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 83,500 2950 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 4000 6 X 12 28.27 114,500 4050 BORATORY.DATA REMARKS _______________________ _ STRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER .1 Sampling And Testing >nducted in Accordance With iTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: 31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 --. '' ,' J' 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS 1675 FARADAY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR HAMANN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING TO BE BILLED -----=HAMANN==='-~C=O=N=S=TR=U~C~T=I=O=N=-=------------------ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE 05-13-97 MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER _____ 6~2~2~4_3_3 ___ _ MIX NUMBER 552 TIME IN MIXER ----~3~9 ____ M=I=N'----- SLUMP-------~~~?-"------- TYPE CEMENT -----=I=I'-------- UNIT WEIGHT -----=N~/~A:-____ _ ADMIXTURE ______ WR"-'-"-"D=A=--....;6~4"---- AIR CONTENT -----=N~/Aa=._. ___ _ DESIGN STRENGTH ____ 3:;...0~0:;...0'------ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 24 (@ 160 YD3 ) SPECIAL.TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS _________________ _ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ------=H~.'----"'S=AR=KAN==I-DATE RECEIVED IN LAB --=05=--....:1:aa..6:;...--=9'-'7_ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 9 28 10 28 11 H 12 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 77,500 2740 6 X 12 28.27 106,000 3750 6 X 12 28.27 103,500 3660 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _______________________ _ -·-DISTRIBUTION: OWNER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: (! Gf27/g7 DATE: I I C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 SUPPLIER .1' WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST -PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS. __ ~1~6~7~5~F~ARA==D=A~Y~A~VE=N~U~E~,~C=AR=L=S=B=A=D~,---=-CAL==IF~O=R=N=I=A=-=-------- CONTRACTOR ----~HAMAN~=~N:......:C~O=N=ST=R=U~C=T=I=O=N-=------------------ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _K=E=N=N=E=T=H:::......;:;Da.......;;;S=M=I=T=H-=-&~A=S=S=--=O=--=C~.~L~R=2=H=---=E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=IN=G=------- TO BE BILLED ___ __.HAMAN===N:..-=:C=O=N=S=TR=U=C=T=I=O=N"------------------ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ____ 0=--=5;:;...-~1=--=3~-~9-=-7 __ _ MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER ----~6~2=2=5~0~6 __ _ MIX NUMBER -----~5~5=2=------ SLUMP -------~5~"-------.,, TYPE CEMENT ____ __,I=I=------- UNIT WEIGHT _______ N-/~A"'------ TIME IN MIXER ----~3=9;__:;.M=I=N'----- ADMIXTURE ------~W=R=DA=-6;:;...4=----- AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A'------ DESIGN STRENGTH ---~3~0~0~0;;._ ___ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 40 (@ 350 YD3 ) SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCT~ONS OR REMARKS _________________ _ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI --------'~-~-----=---DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0~5;:;...-~l=--=6~-..=;.9...:.7_ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 5 28 6 28 7 H 8 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 93,000 3290 6 X 12 28.27 110,000 3890 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 4000 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _______________________ _ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, REVIEWED BY: DATE: C42-90 SUPPLIER _,. WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS --~1~6~7~5-=-F=ARA=D=A=Y~_~A~VE=N~U=E~,~-=CAR=L=S=B=A=D~,<--=C=AL=I=F~O=R=N=I=A ________ _ CONTRACTOR ----~HAMAN===N_C~O=N=·s~T=R=U~C=T=I~O=N __________________ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER --'K=E=N=N=E=T=H=-=D-=SM=IT=H:::;__;&;;._::;A=S=S~O~C~.~/=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N~G---_____ _ TO BE BILLED ----=HAMANN===-=CO=N=S=T=R=U~C~T=I=O=N---_______________ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF 00 CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE -----'0~5~-~1=3~-~9~7 __ _ MIX DESCRIPTION N/~ TICKET NUMBER _____ 6~2~2~4~6-7 ___ _ MIX NUMBER 552 TIME IN MIXER 59 MIN -----=------------- SLUMP 5" ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 .. ------~~-----'----- TYPE CEMENT II AIR CONTENT -----~N_/~A~---- UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH ____ 3~0~0~0 _______ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 18 (@ 270 YD3 ) j SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS _________________ _ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY H. SARKANI ----~-=="-----'----DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0~5~-~1~6_-~9~7- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 1 28 2 28 3 H 4 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 91,000 3220 6 X 12 28.27 117,500 4160 6 X 12 28.27 115,000 4070 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ______________________ _ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, REVIEWED BY: DATE: C42-90 SUPPLIER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIELD WELDING 0 H. S. BOLTING 0 SHOP WELDING i~t3DRP&raday Ave. , Carlsbad N(97-328 0 FIREPROOFING D NOT 0 0/B ANCHORAGE I FOR WEEK ENDING Jan. 9 I PLAN FILE NO. DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ~~~ft E. Dyson DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) A36 Steel, E7018/SMAW & NR211/FCAW wtman Testing Laboratories ~·i~LU WELDING INSPECTION 1-9-98 .for 0 SHOTCRETE D OTHER ,98 A. Reported #1 & #2. to the job site a periodic inspection of field welding at stairs ....... B. Verified three certified welders qualifications for welding procedure specifications required for all stairways. c. Visually inspected the field welding of the following connections 1. Four 3/8" shear plates (two at sides of each stringer) to W21x44 beam web/flanges at 2nd floor landing of stair #1, per 3/S2. Noticed & informed contractor that shear plates' holes are not in alignment with stringers' holes for 3/4" dia. A307 machine bolts. 2. Stair risers to C12x20.7 stringers between top of slab & the landing pan per detail 11/S2 except that top three risers immediately below the landing pan (on the side near glass windows)had gaps of 1/4" to 1/2" with the stringer. Si~ilar observation was made on stairs above the landing. Contractor was aware of the condition & corrections was underway (had started & in progress). D. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location and unless otherwise noted, are free of visible defects and in accordance with the referenced details, except as noted on section C. To the best of my knowledge. CLS 1-14-98 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. Hossein F. Sarkani Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE -f'~1~R~araday Ave., Carlsbad N097-328 I FOR WEEK ENDING JAN 2 1<:98 :rn'sOrtff<offp NAME B~.;_ 's~T NO. I PLAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, GRADE. ETC.) ARCHITECT DESIGN STRENGTH I SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1INERAL CONT&CTOrt, t , amann ons rue ion C§NB. DOaG REPORTED rlORK w ld . • • ons~ruc ion e ing ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 1-2-98 Inspection of welds on stringers, landings and tread pans of stairs #2, & #3. Both sets of stairs in progress of erection and-welding. Welds that were complete and in progress were made by a welder certified for process and position used. Size and location for this project. of completed welds conformed to applicable plans and specs CLS 1-7-98 Signed copy on file. Charles Bryan \ A CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE (._)~ VoJ\ ~~n l.)J"J.#\_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS I l:i}cf <Jj Ur I<~~·~· 7 w :TOI~ -OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & =ti= '5-3'5 SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. --r:5AT" l<t:l"Ul<1 REGISTER NOMBW 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS c~&-~5..,..,,.F~A¥-A¥EN8E. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR HAMANN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING TO BE BILLED HAMANN CONSTRUCTION BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE 10-01-97 MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER 17462 MIX NUMBER 602 TIME IN MIXER 65 MIN SLUMP 5" ADMIXTURE WRDA 64 TYPE CEMENT N/A AIR _CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 325n LOCATION OF PLACEMENT MEZZANINE DECK BTWN·LN J AND R. 6.2 AND 3.5 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH ( f, c) ~·o·o·0\ PS I AT 2 8 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY _____ R=.----"'D=A=L=E~--DATE RECEIVED IN LAB _ ___,N=/~A-=---- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 33 28 34 28 35 H 36 DATE TESTED 10-08-97 10-29-97 10-29-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 80,000 2830 6 X 12 28.27 97,000 3430 6 X 12 28.27 100,000 -=s~5=4=-0 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _______________________ _ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER,· ARCHITECT!·ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, CITY, SUPPLIER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVI!lWED BY; tR ~t' DATE: //-?;-9::z C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 /4 .A'\~ WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487 -0355 PROJECT ------~T=H=E:......=I=R=I=S_G=R=O=U=P=-----PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS -1"'6'9'5--F~kY-A""E-mm, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR _____ HAMANN==-=------C=O=N=S=TR=U-C=T=I=O=N"------------------ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING TO BE BILLED HAMANN CONSTRUCTION BLDG .. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ___ __,,0=9_-=3=0~-9~7,__ __ MIX DESCRIPTION 6 SK TICKET NUMBER -----1~7~4=15 ___ _ MIX NUMBER -----~6~0-2,__ ____ _ SLUMP ________ 5_11 ______ _ TYPE CEMENT -------=-N~/=A,__ ____ _ UNIT WEIGHT -----=N~/=A,__ ____ _ TIME IN MIXER ----~6-0~M=-=IN,.,_ __ _ ADMIXTURE ------~W=RD==-=A'---=-64-=---- AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A~---- DESIGN STRENGTH ----3=2=5~0 ___ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ·MEZZANINE DECK BTWN LN JANDA. 5 AND 1 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS __________________ _ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) ~3~0:0:0 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY _____ R~.'--"D=A=L=E,__ __ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB _ __,N=/~A~--- LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE FIELD LAB DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NO. TESTED INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 7 29 10-07-97 6 X 12 28.27 78,000 2760 28 30 10-28-97 6 X 12 28.27 111,000 3930 28 31 10-28-97 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 -4fo.o~oJ H 32 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR. CITY. SUPPLIER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: /I-?.-9 Z C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL. 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S, BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE. ~ ~ff-t!S~~~r:ci::qayi\y~. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 197 f~~a~~0:!v1"~ti~ ~'.a~ ~~1Ii'10. I PLAN FILE NO. ~S41'@TR~~Iff\f RADE, ETC.) ffiCHITECTth D enne • Smith _9131;1(fflf6NGTH I S9,'FaR~11.itrRSteel rj~rRRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) lf~AL CONE,ACTOf t • ann ons rue ion "B" decking, electrodes:6022 SMAW DONTb DOING ~tORTE1 WORK ra eim ee process ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-12-97 Observed & Visually inspected the continuous field welding of the "B" decking on the 2nd roof levels between grids A thru R & 1 thru 8. Welding per SD4/A. 1/2" puddle welds @ every low@ the parallels 12 OoC • f crimp, button punch & stitch welds @ 24 o.c. (1-1/2" stitch min. ) • To the best of my knowledge, all welding is in accordance with the approved plans & specifications & and unless otherwise noted, n9 discrepancies found. Inspected the welds for size, length, & location, observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. · · CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS .. - :-1-\ :' Robert Dickerson SIGNATURE Of REGISTERED INSPECToR DATE Of REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NOT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE ~1'.~R?~r~day-Av<s. N(97-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 197 ~~lf'!8'l:f§0 !_~~fj_'tl_Ee ~~:2~~{f· I PLAN FILE NO. '"1Jl~TRcm-c11tI!n<fRADE. ETC.) 'je'.CHITECTth D enne • Smith ~l';~f6R(5NGTH I SOU'J5f g'b_tg,rHt ~Gl~i:eR • Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 'ff,NERAL CONEACTOft t . amann ons rue ion 22GA #446 decking l}jNT[hDOING R§'t'RTE'i WORK ra eim ee Electrodes:6022 SMAW Process ~~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-11-97 5 welders AWS certified Observed & visually inspected the continuous field welding of the roof & 2nd floor decking. Located between grid lines A thru Rand grid lines #1 thru #8. Welded per SD4/A. 1/2" puddle welds@ each/low & 12 o.c. @ the parallels@ the seams crimped & stitched weld 1-1/2" min. @ 24 o.c. : To the best of my knowledge all welding meets or exceeds the criteria set forth in the AWS Dl.3-96 manual & all other applicable codes, & plans specifications. Inspected welds for·size, length, location & unless otherwise noted no discrepancies found. Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. ( 2) welders were added @ 12:00 pm. Eugene sherwood and Alice K. Lesley CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. (L.A. certified) • - j ·J:. Robert Dickerson SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECToR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories (619) 675-0270 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING 0 SHOTCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE 0 H. S. BOLTING D NDT D OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE i~jgD~M:"acia-Ave\ ... ,,, ______ y ____ , __ N~7-091 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 ,97 :lf~~!a~,Of~&iti~ ~13<§ ~~141°· I PLAN FILE NO. 4S!tt,6~R. ~~PE@dRF:i_'n,~ 1(&¥ili~th D. Smith !3~1;~ ij~NGTH I sou'I5ta:ii'tfffi steel ~,r~RRandhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) If~~rfiPNEc§hT~lruction "B II decking, electrodes:6022 SMAW ~ci~~<_r~ ~~OJ~i WORK Process ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-10-97 Observed & visually inspected the continuous field welding of the roof decking to the joists. A meeting was held yesterday 2:30 pm between the reps from Hamann Construction, Draheim Steel & Sierra Erectors. Where the pipe posts sit on the joists & W/F beams Draheim Steel, ,;~ill weld angle backing for deck bearing as needed. Where the enclosure plate on the 2nd floor, needs to be the same height as the joists, will be sending a detail fix on the situation. the engineer of record At roof level, Draheim Steel shook-out the decking & welded@ grids 1 & 2 between A thru D, also went line 4 between D thru P lines. Cutting the deck around the pipe posts, as needed per SD4/A, 1/2" puddle welds, every low & @ parallels 12 o.c., crimped & stitched welded (1-1/2" min) 24 o.c. shook/out decking @ grids E thru s between 6 thru 8 (roof level). Inspected welds for size, length, location & unless otherwise noted no discrepancies found. Observed welders for proper procedures & techniques. To the best of my knowledge. I :,t ;·.f :.;. CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE slGNAtOl~E OF l~EGISlERED INsPEC1ol~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL 0 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE (61_9) 675-0270 0 FIELD WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING . 0 SHOTCRETE [] H. S. BOLTING D NDT 0 OTHER INSPECTOR OF 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 SHOP WELDING 0 D/B ANCHORAGE tr~ 1~~~%lra~day -Ayg. Nq}7-Q91 I FOR WEEK ENDING Sept. 12 1fJ7 ~~~ffiff0 ~<v~ffi1e B&9i~~r;f· I PLAN FILE NO. Si9flfR·~c;-Ri· Gf~JfTC.vB 11 decking ~CHITECTth D enne • Smith ~§';~NGTH I SOJ:>fa'.ti~{:ffi.R·steel ~GIN~R , Ji Randhua & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR.) 1fNERAL C0N~ACTO't t , amann ons rue ion IIB II Decking <jfJNTf!P0lNG R5€,RTE5._ W<aK ra eim ee o. ~an Testing Laboratories FIELD WELDING INSPECTION 9-9-97 3 welders AWS Certified Visually observed & inspected the continuous field welding of the 11B II decking to the joists starting@ grid J to P between #1 thru #8 lines per SD4/A 1/211 puddle welds @ each/low & 12 o.c. on the parallels. 1-1/2" stitch/welc;is (min) 24 o.c. on the seams, after button punching (crimping) roof level. Spoke with Mark Miller (early am) superintendent for Hamann, regarding the areas that can/not be decked, till backing for bearing is welded or enclo~ure bent plate is needed@ various locations, involved parties. on the 2nd floor & roof. He will get with the Draheim Steel started laying out the sheets on the 2nd 'floor, starting between grids J & L between 3 6.2. & All welding is in compliance with the plans & specifications (approved) ot the best of my knowledge. Inspected the welds for size, length & location & unless otherwise noted, defects found. Observed welders for proper procedures and techniques • no .. .',f ....... - CLS 09-15-97 Signed copy on file. Robert Dickerson CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS. DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER '; :, :: . · .. · '• •, ,. :--; ::: .. ,. ------·----------.--. -------------~------· .,...-..,_.--·-·-- f. WYMAN TESTfNG LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS -----'~~1=6~7~5~·=F=·ARA=·=DA=Y===··A=V~E=N~U=rE~,--=C=AR=L=SB=A=D:::.-L-,~C=AL=I=F~O=R=N=I=A'--------• CONTRACTOR HAMANN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING TO BE BILLED HAMANN CONSTRUCTION BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE _______ 0~5_-=1~6-~9 __ 7~-- MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER -----'-6~2~3~05_5 ____ _ •' MIX NUMBER 6578 TIME IN MIXER ________ 4~1_M~IN~--- SLUMP --------:-5-5-=l-/2~'-' ____ _ .,.:C' ADMIXTURE ------=N-/=A~---- TYPE CEMENT _____ I=I~------AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A _____ _ UNIT WEIGHT -----N-L~A"-'-. -----DESIGN STRENGTH _______ 4~0 ____ 0~0 ___ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT_---'P~A=N=E=L~P--4=A=-------------------- SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCT~ONS OR REMARKS ------------------ REQUIRED STRENGTH ( f ' c ) \. . ~400-0-PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ----~A=·-C=O=O=L=E=Y=--DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0~5 __ -____ 1=9_-~9-'-7_ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 25 28 26 28 27 H 28 DATE TESTED 05-23-97 06-13-97 06-13-97 LABORATORY.DATA REMARKS LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 83,500 2950 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 4000 6 X 12 28.27 114,500 \4~·01 ------------------------ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINE-ER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 ·---· ~ --· ... ~ . / 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 \ -,, ~------------, PROJECT ADDRESS -~~1~6~7~5 .......... F=ARA=-==DA=Y-----'A~V~-E=N~U~E~,~C=AR~L~SB~A~D"-,~C=AL=I=F~O~R=N~I=A ________ _ CONTRAGTOR -----"'H=AMAN==N-=CO=N=S=T=R=U=C=T=I=O=N'------------------ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ---'K=E=N=N=E=T=H:..-:D:........=S=M=I=TH=-:&=-=A=S=S=O=C=.~/=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N=G'--_____ _ TO BE BILLED ----"'HAMAN===N-=C=ON=S=T=R=U=C=T=I=O=N'------------------ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER ------=N=E=L=S=ON=....;S=L=O=AN=--- MIX DESCRIPTION __ .......... N-/-=A~----- MIX NUMBER -----~6~5~7-=8 _____ _ SLUMP -------~-=5_" ______ _ TYPE CEMENT ------"'I=I ________ _ UNIT WEIGHT _________ N-/=A _______ _ PLACEMENT DATE ___ .......... 0-=5_--=1-"-6--9"-7-=---- TICKET NUMBER '-----=6=2=3-"-04=7-=----- TIME IN MIXER -----=6-=5--=M=IN=----- ADMIXTURE ------=N~/=A'------ AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A=------- DESIGN STRENGTH ____ 4~0_0~0 ______ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT.. PANEL P-32 -.........c=--=----=--...c...=------------------- S PE CI AL TEST INSTRUCT.fONS OR REMARKS ------------------ REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) ,:.-._4~~0~:::::i PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY --------"'-A~-~CO~O=L=E~Y-----DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ o_s_-_1_9_-_9-7_ LABORATORY DATA FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS TEST AREA INCHES SQ. INCHES 7 21 05-23-97 6 X 12 28.27 28 22 06-13-97 6 X 12 28.27 28 23 06-13-97 6 X 12 28.27 H 24 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER" All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, REVIEWED BY: 6/30/32 DATE: I I C42-90 COMPRESSIVE MAX LOAD STRENGTH POUNDS PSI 83,000 2940 114,000 4030 116,000 !4-1--0-o=, ,,__ ,... _.,. SUPPLIER 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 PROJECT ------=T=H=E_I=R=I=S"----'G=R=O~U=P __ _ PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS -~\~·~·1=6~·7~5-~-~F=A=RA=~=DA=Y=·=-A=VE--=N~U=~=·•~C=A=R=LS=B=A=D=---<--,~C=AL=I=F~O=R=N=I=A'-------- CONTRACTOR -------=H=AMAN==N_C=O=N=S=T=R=U~C=T=I=O=N'------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER __,K=E=N=N=E=T=H==---=Dc....=S=M=IT=H:::-;&=---=A=S=S=O~C~.~/=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N=G'---_____ _ TO BE BILLED ----,---=HAMAN===N:.......=C=ON=S=T=R=U=C=T=I~O=N=-------------------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF Lfil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON MIX DESCRIPTION N/A MIX NUMBER 6578 SLUMP 6 II . TYPE CEMENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT_ N/A -'--. -•' ••• • • , 1 f • -: • ·, '.-t ~ ' J ~ • 1 • ' ~ I • SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ___ -ac.0=5_-=1=5-~9~7'----- TICKET NUMBER ----=1=0=63=7~0;:;_ __ _ TIME IN MIXER ----~3~7_M=IN;:.:_ __ _ ADMIXTURE ------=N~/=A,__ ___ _ AIR .CONTENT -·-------=N~/=A=-------- .. <: ·PE.sI~N s1R~:t-:JGTa_ ---~3-·~_o __ ~---=--- LOCATION.OF PLACEMENT; PANEL 48 --==-=-..;;a.;:;..._ _____________________ _ ". ~ .. ~--. ·. -\_ .. _ , SPEC I AL ·:T1isT INSTRUCT-!:ONS-·-oR · REMAfli<S ------------------REQUIRED S_TRENGTH ( f • c) ---~00) PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY S. FLORES ----------=--'--====-=--DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0~5~-~1=6~-~9~7- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 17 28 18 28 19 H 20 . . DATE. TESTED 05-22-97 06-12-97 06-12-97 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 87,000 3080 6 X 12 28.27 110,000 3890 6 X 12 28.27 115,500 1 409~i ------------------------ DIST RIB UT ION': .. OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER ·t:~,--~ .. --.~--~f:,~-· , ...... ~ -::~"_···· ..... -~ _: ... :.:. ~))-. SapipJ.,tI).g. And. Testin_g. . .. ~o~ducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations . REYIEWED BY: G/2~./9-7·,:. 7 I DATE: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 •,d WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 ~ 1-800-487-0355 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS --·~\1=6=·7~,5--·-~--~~"~=~-~~PA~---~~-~~iA~:Jl-.. E=N~U-E~,---"C=AR=-=L=SB=A=D=---,_C=AL=I=F~O=R=N=I=A=-------- CONTRACTOR ________ HAMAN---==----=N ___ CO~N-S~T=R~U~C~T=I~O=N=------------------ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _K_E-N_N-E_T-H_D-=S=M=IT=H-=-&----"A=S~S~o~c~··-/=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N~G _______ _ TO BE BILLED ----=H=AMANN==:..-=C=ON=S=T=R=U=C=T~I=O=N,__ _______________ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF w CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ________ 0~5_-=1=3-~9~7'---- MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER ----~6=2=24=0~4;__ __ _ MIX NUMBER -----~5=5=2'------- SLUMP ____________ 6-=-3-/4.;:._" ____ _ TYPE CEMENT -----=I=I.._ _____ _ UNIT WEIGHT ------=-·N_/=A=------- TIME IN MIXER ----=5=9~M=I=N=---- ADMIXTURE ------~W=R=DA::.::-=64.;:._ __ AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A=------ DESIGN STRENGTH ---~3~0=0~0 ___ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT-____ P=AN=E=L;;.....:::2~7__,,(~@_:;..9~0~YD~3~} ______________ _ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTTONS OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH(f'c) .=}'f~ PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY _____ H_._S-AR=KAN----==I'--DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0=5~-~1~6~-~9~7- LABORATORY DATA FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS TEST AREA INCHES SQ. INCHES 7 13 05-20-97 6 X 12 28.27 28 14 06-10-97 6 X 12 28.27 28 15 06-10-97 6 X 12 28.27 H 16 . LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER CONT All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, ~42-90 COMPRESSIVE MAX LOAD STRENGTH POUNDS PSI 74,500 2630 103,500 3660 104,000 r~lf.S·!:k SUPPLIER 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 1-800-487-0355 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS ---\~i=~=1=.5~·=F=.ARA=·=· =D=A=Y-~A=V~-E=-N=U=.E=~'--=C=AR=L=SB=A=D==--<-,~C=A=L=I=F~O=R=N=I=A,_ _____ _ CONTRACTOR ------=H=AMAN==N-=CO=N=S=T=R~U~C~T=I=O=N=------------------- ARCHITECT/ENGINEER __ K=E=N=N=E=T=H=-=D:......=S=M=I=T=H~&::,._,:A=S~S~O~C~.~/=R=2=H~E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N~G'------- TO BE BILLED -----=H=AMAN==N:-.;:::C=ON=S=T=R=U=C=T~I=O=N,_ _______________ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ---~0~5_-~1~3-~9~7~-- MIX DESCRIPTION N/~ TICKET NUMBER ----~6~2-2_4~33~--- MIX NUMBER -----~5~5~2 _______ _ SLUMP -------~6-" ______ _ TYPE CEMENT _____ I-I ________ _ UNIT WEIGHT ________ N_/=A _______ _ TIME IN MIXER ----~3~9_M~IN~--- ADMIXTURE ------~W=R=DA=-~64-=--- AIR CONTENT -----~N~/=A,_ ___ _ DESIGN STRENGTH ---~3~0~0~0,_ ___ _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT~-~P=A=N=E=L=---aa2~4=-----{~@-=1=6=0_Y=D~3~) ______________ _ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCT!ONS OR REMARKS ------------------ REQUIRED STRENGTH ( f 'c) -~f@7@"C=h PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ----~H_.~SAR~KAN--==-I-DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0=5~-~1~6~-~9~7- FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 9 28 10 28 11 H 12 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 77,500 2740 6 X 12 28.27 106,000 3750 -c:::.:.;;::3~6.6°W 6 X 12 28.27 103,500 . DISTRIBUTION: _·_=OWN=E=R=· ......... ===-==-=.z-====--===::;,===-<-,..--==-=-=:..1..-~S~U=P~P=L=I=E=R~---- All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, REVIEWED BY: {! G/27/97 DATE: , 7 C42-90 .. ·' , .. ·-. WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 ... 1-800-487-0355 PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 97-091 PROJECT ADDRESS \J:~75-':·F~~:Y~A~N..'..t!E, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR HAMANN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER KENNETH D SMITH & ASSOC./R2H ENGINEERING TO BE BILLED -------=HAMAN===N:.....=C=ON=S~T=R=U=C=T~I~O=N=------------------- BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF [fil CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ----=-0=5_-=13~-~9~7'---- MIX DESCRIPTION . N/A TICKET NUMBER _____ 6_2_2_50~6 ___ _ MIX NUMBER -----~5~5~2 ______ _ TIME IN MIXER ________ 3 ___ 9_M~I=N'-'------ SLUMP ________ 5_" ______ _ ADMIXTURE ------~W=R=D=A'-"--6~4 __ _ TYPE CEMENT ----~I=I _______ _ AIR CONTENT -----=N~/A=----- UNIT WEIGHT _____ N_/-A----____ _ DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 -----"-------------- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT.. PANEL 40 (@ 350 YD 3 ) SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTtONS OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH ( f 'c) L3,0.c;>,if1 PSI AT 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ------=H __ .--=.;SAR=K=AN=I~ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0.=..;;5:;_-...::1:::..;;6c.---=:;.9_,_7_ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 5 28 6 28 7 H 8 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 93,000 3290 6 X 12 28.27 110,000 3890 6 X 12 28.27 113,000 · "~~4-0:Q o-i. - LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _______________________ _ DISTRIBUTION:. OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations REVIEWED BY: DATE: C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, C42-90 SUPPLIER WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT THE IRIS GROUP PROJECT NO. 17150 Via Del Campo Suite 307 San Diego, CA 92127 ~ 1-800-487-0355 97-091 c--· . , ... · .. : ~-.:..~ -PROJECT ADDRESS t:·0..cili-6-7c5 -~FARADA:Y:;:;AVE'NHE,, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ------=HAMAN===N~C=ON=S=T=R=U~C=T=I~O=N=------------------ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER --'K=E=N=N=E=T=H=--=D;_::.S=M=IT=H::=--:&~A=S=S~O~C~-~/=R=2=H--=E=N=G=I=N=E=E=R=I=N=G=-------- TO BE BILLED -----=HAMAN===N~C~O=N=ST=R~U~C~T~I~O=N __________________ _ BLDG. PERMIT NO. 962041 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF !Kl CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER NELSON SLOAN PLACEMENT DATE ___ _,;,0=5_-=13~--'9~7=---- MIX DESCRIPTION N/~ TICKET NUMBER ----~6=2=24~6~7---__ _ MIX NUMBER 552 ------~------ SLUMP 5" _______ ......__ ______ _ TIME IN MIXER -----=5.:;;..9__,M=I=N~--- ADMIXTURE ------~W=R~D~A-'-64-=--- TYPE CEMENT II AIR CONTENT -----=N-/A=----- UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH -----=3"'"'0a...;0a...;0=------ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT... PANEL 18 (@ 270 YD3 ) SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTfONS OR REMARKS ------------------ REQUIRED STRENGTH ( f 'c) c;::S:0:0:Q} PS I AT 2 8 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY ____ _;;;:H=·-=SAR=KAN==I~ DATE RECEIVED IN LAB __ 0_5_-_1_6_-_9_7_ FIELD LAB IDENTITY NO. 7 1 28 2 28 3 H 4 DATE TESTED 05-20-97 06-10-97 06-10-97 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS LABORATORY DATA COMPRESSIVE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH INCHES SQ. INCHES POUNDS PSI 6 X 12 28.27 91,000 3220 6 X 12 28.27 117,500 4160 6 X 12 28.27 115,000 <:::-4:u-=F0• ------------------------ DISTRIBUTION: OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER All Sampling And Testing Conducted in Accordance With ASTM Standard Designations C31-91, C39-86, C78-84, C617-87, REVIEWED BY: DATE: C42-90 SUPPLIER EsGil Corporation Professiona( Pfan. $.!.view 'Engineers DATE: 1/26/98 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday PROJECT NAME: The Iris Group SET: IV 0 APPLICANT i!f JURIS. 0 PLAN REVIEWER ·.O flLE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. [gl The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [gl Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [gl REMARKS: Verify local Fire Dept. OK with relocated 2 hr. wall, and Planning OK with roof screening of roof top equipment. By: Mike Kratz Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/20/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ·+ San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 ; EsGil Corporation Professional Pfan. ~view 'E11tJineers DATE: 12/29/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday PROJECT NAME: The Iris Group SET: III D APPLICANT @:"JURIS::, D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [g] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Hyndman & Hyndman 2611 South Hwy. 101, Suite 201, Solana Beach, CA 92007 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been c_ompleted. [g] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Hyndman & Hyndman Telephone#: (760) 634-2595 Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: (760) 634-0285 Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Mike Kratz Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA DCM D EJ 0 PC 12/19/97 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-2342 III 12/29/97 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/19/97 REVIEWED BY: Mike Kratz FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 12/29/97 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, plea~e identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? CIYes CINo _.., Carlsbad 97-2342 III 12/29/97 1. Please make all corrections on the.original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports d1rectly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 7. Obtain Fire Department approval for alterations to the 2 hr. wall. 13. Provide designs/details for relocation of skylights. If skylights are relocated under this permit, conformance must be shown. 12/29197: Provide structural details for installation of relocated skylights. 17. Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City Policy 80-6). If new roof top equipment is installed under this permit, compliance must be shown. 12/29/97: City to review roof screening. 18. All roof-mounted equipment shall be concealed from view. Provide structural detailing for the screening. If required per 17 above compliance must be shown. 12/29197: City to review roof screening. If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact Mike Kratz of Esgi/ Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. Applicant can meet with plan checker to resolve these final outstanding items. ... DATE: 10/21/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 EsGil Corporation Professional Pfan. !R,_t!vif!UI 'F,nginurs SET:11 PR9JECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday PROJECT NAME: The Iris Group D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D . The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted he·rewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil . Corporation ·u·ntil corrected plans are submitted for recheck. -·· · . . ''• D The appl:icant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forwi;3rd to the applicant contact person. - [gj The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Hyndman & Hyndman 2611 South Hwy. 101, Suite 201, Solana Beach, CA 92007 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise.the applicant that the plan check has been· completed. [gj Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Hyndman & Hyndman (Dennis) _Telephone#: 634-2595 Datecontacted:10/2.,/cr,i -(by:/,L) Fax#: ~00) i3c_/.02~5'" MailJ Telephone v Fax .......--Jn Person D REMARKS: By: Mike Kratz Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC Enclosures: 10/13/97 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fa"X (619) 560-1576 .J .. -. Carlsbad 97-2342 II 10/21/97 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad - PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/13/97 REVIEWED BY: Mike Kratz FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 10/21/97 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following item$ listed need clarification; modification or_ change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the citeq codes and regulations., Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any st?te, county or city law. A -Pleas-e make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: · Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep· a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact rrie if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? ~Yes DNo kWW 11Ccffff?.A-FLA-M~Tf<ANGP~ flf<--13 ~ Nf ~F-.#3 J -~~ IO/A6;2.. bO (viJtt A--PP 1L.. 'PDTAiLG Fof<. C>B!L;tJ\16--FMMIN.6-NS ~\Jtf.3'ffl0 131 ftBLO lN~f<. Mb-~ Or' T, I 'PtiR-Krr c.13 q7e,,64-B -BrJ5 lc;'/:Z1/q7 4.GODW 'PvT.A-Lbc:S 9tff; /;.8d : ,, . : Carlsbad 97-2342 II 10/21/97 f Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department-for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. · 2. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there are no structural changes. Business and Professions Co<;ie. M sheets and E-1 must be signed by their designers. ;\-U,. '61 ~ . 6. Provide a fully dimensioned floor plan showing the size and use of all rooms or. areas within the space being improved or altered. Ora~ the plans to scale and indicate the scale on the plan .. _Section 106.3.3. Whqt is use of 1st f/oor?- 0pen 0ffice?''(W, --Sr3e J /Aa.,o, . .' . 7. Obtain Fire Departm.ent_approval for alterations to the 2 hr. wall. O~. (A~) 9. Will the areas of alteration have adequate exits? Provide an exiting plan showing paths of exit travel, and that the exiting will conform to the current UBC. Additional corrections may be per.iding on recheck. Is there an __!!Xit door at ri.6>0NR cross grids 2-E? If so, show it on the plans. Y&=6 CTYF A-! AU ex{T r~ ~e 1/;+:z.,t? · 10. Specify on the plans the fire ratings of assemblies to protect penetrations or proposed openings in existing or new fire walls, floor-ceiling assemblies or roof-ceiling assemblies. There is a new 2 hr. wall. <8tf!3 Cl00!7eP 6·lfM5Ml-N<?T-5 <ef!T Ao,o. 11. A complete description of the activities and processes that will occur in this tenant space should be provided. A listing of all hazardous materials should be included. The materials listing should be stated in a form that would make· classification in Tables 3-D and 3-E possible. The building official may require a technical report to identify and develop methods of protection from hazardous materials. Section 307.1.6. No response was found. -see llt7lcJ + £:;ffT rt/, /P. -Ff<l3/tofJSlY APff?OI-W-No NW/ ~ 13. Provide designs/details for"relocation of skylights. If skylights are relocated under this permit, conformance must be shown. ~ lf.B/Ae>1 a.... ., ' . Carlsbad 97-2342 II 10/21/97 17. Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City Policy 80-6). · If new roof top equipment is installed under this permit, compliance must be shown. No-re~ttTOF ~OMrf-e~ 00-AtZOf;fJtiCU) ~ 2W H~ 18. All roof-mounted equipment shall be concealed from view. Provide structural • detailing for the screening. If required per 17 above compliance must be shown. see 0/lfT I/-T9 v-e,. T.C?.W-q,/A~~ ~~ Will, tf-lPe ~ o/Vff7 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition. of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows: (1) Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public. (2) Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities . . · (3) Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. . : · ·(4) All existing . accommodatio"ns when alterations, structural repairs or - ditions are made to such accommodations. · /:-·u G .. A:ILB'#8TIN& .. FWJtMl7( ru<MrrreP 0~ L'11P T<L4 \,\1 l• ~HT ~Rl•' NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California-· Building Code, Title 24. • REMODELS, ADDiTiONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the requirements ·for new buildings, per Section 1134B.2. These requirements apply only to the area of specific alteration, repair or addition and shall include: a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area i_n question, and include the following items which serve th,rea in question: ~ -r. l, ~t'\iT ) i) Sanitary facilities. ~ ~ = A Ito ~ ri) Drinking fountains.J -H1-)--PttbHcietephones:-N<:7N £1 2. If an unreasonable hardship finding is granted, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access, per Section 1134B.2.1 Exception #1. The order of priority shown below should be followed: , / Carlsbad 97-2342 II 10/21/97 a) ~U,~ b) ~~· c) ~~r -~ d) ~~e) AldJ, f) An accessible entrance. An accessible route of travel. At least one accessible restroom for each sex. Accessible telephones. Accessible drinking fountains. When possible, additional accessible elements such as parking, storage and alarms. ' 3. Provide evidence that existing portions were built under the current Disabled Access Regulations, or show on plans compete compliance of paths of travel, sanitary facilities, drinking fountains and public telephones. No response was found. SBE t?/,e,lr£3t,W A-ca~ #t77"i7 ~T. A-I, t? • If you have any questions reg_arding these items, please contact Mike Kratz of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. ' .,, EsGil Corporation Professionaf Pfan !l{eview 'E.ngineers DATE: 9/4/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Ave. PROJECT NAME: The Iris Group SET:I D~NT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for: your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Hyndman & Hayndman 2611 South Hwy. 101, suite 201, Solana Beach, CA 92007 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. IZ] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Hyndman & Hyndman ( \::)bJiJ1 s) Telephone#: 634-2595 Date contacted: 9 \'-t !en (by: ~ ) Fax #: Mail ~/ Telephonev Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: Mike Kratz Esgil Corporation f:8] GA O CM f:8] EJ O PC Enclosures: 8/25/97 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST TENANT IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 OCCUPANCY: B/F-1/S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-n Spr. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: SPRINKLERS?: yes REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 6/22/97 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 9/4/97 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Office/? ACTUAL AREA: NC STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: OCCUPANT LOAD: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/25/97 PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Kratz This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 40, TENANT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ENERGY DATA OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994UBC) tiforw.dot Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. · NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there are no structural changes. Business and Professions Code. 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1993 NEC. 4. On the first sheet of the plans indicate: • The floor area of the remodeled area, • Present and proposed use and occupancy classifications of the remodel area, • The use of adjacent spaces to the area of alteration, • The occupant load of the remodel area(s). 5. Indicate the use of all spaces adjacent to the area being remodeled or improved. 6. Provide a·fully dimensioned floor plan showing the size and use of all rooms or areas within the space being improved or altered. Draw the plans to scale and indicate the scale on the plan. Section 106.3.3. 7. Clarify the purpose of the 2 hr. fire rated wall removed, (Area separation walls, Occupancy separation walls, Horizontal exit wall, etc.) and show that its integrity remains with new wall construction. 8. Why is 2nd floor open to area below? Is the integrity of the fire rated wall above required? Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 9. Will the areas of alteration have adequate exits? Provide an exiting plan showing paths of exit travel, and that the exiting will conform to the current UBC. Additional corrections may be pending on recheck. 10. Specify on the plans the fire ratings of assemblies to protect penetrations or proposed openings in existing or new fire walls, floor-ceiling assemblies or roof-ceiling assemblies. 11. A complete description of the activities and processes that will occur in this tenant space should be provided. A listing of all hazardous materials should be included. The materials listing should be stated in a form that would make classification in Tables 3-D and 3-E possible. The building official may require a technical report to identify and develop methods of protection from hazardous materials. Section 307.1.6. 12. Provide a detail of the 2 hr. wall. No detail 7/A8.2 in this submittal. 13. Provide designs/details for relocation of skylights. 14. Provide details for new 2nd floor guard rail. 15. Note on plan that suspended ceilings shall comply with UBC Tables 25-A, 16-0 and 16-B. 16. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. See the attached correction sheet. Title 24, Part 2. • CITY OF CARLSBAD SUPPLEMENT 17. Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City Policy 80-6). 18. All roof-mounted equipment shall be concealed from view. Provide structural detailing for the screening. • MISCELLANEOUS 19. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 20. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of ~orrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes D No D The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mike Kratz at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17 .11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows: (1) Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public. (2) Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities. (3) Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. (4) All existing accommodations when alterations, structural repairs or additions are made to such accommodations. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 11348.2. These requirements apply only to the area of specific alteration, repair or addition and shall include: a) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the area in question, and include the following items which serve the area in question: i) Sanitary facilities. ii) Drinking fountains. iii) Public telephones. 2. If an unreasonable hardship finding is granted, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access, per Section 11348.2.1 Exception #1. The order of priority shown below should be followed: a) An accessible entrance. Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 b) An accessible route of travel. c) At least one accessible restroom for each sex .. d) Accessible telephones. e) Accessible drinking fountains. f) When possible, additional accessible elements such as parking, storage and alarms. 3. Provide evidence that existing portions were built under the current Disabled Access Regulations, or show on plans compete compliance of paths of travel, sanitary facilities, drinking fountains and public telephones. 4. If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact Mike Kratz of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 5. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the licensed designer. 6. Provide data on proposed hazardous material to be stored and used. USC, Section 307 and UFC. a) Clearly show types of hazardous material is being stored or used. Provide the material safety data sheets (MSDS). b) Clearly show the amounts of each type of hazardous material to-be stored and in use. c) Clearly show where in the buildings each type of hazardous material is being stored or used. d) For fumes or vapors that are heavier than air, exhaust shall be taken from a point within 12 inches of the floor. UFC, section 8003.18.2-5. • MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 7. Show the location of the required access ladder to roof mounted HVAC equipment. UMC, Section 321.8 8. Provide smoke detection in supply air duct of 'air-moving system' for required shut-off for smoke control as per UMC, Section 608 and also see Section 203. 9. Detail disposal sites of main condensate drainage from air conditioning units as per UMC Section 310 1 0. The Reflected ceiling plan on sheet A3.1 does not show the supply air diffusers through the drywall ceilings as shown on sheet M-2X. In fact sheet M-2X shows a supply air diffuser at the same location as a light fixture. Please correct. Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 11. In Groups B, F, M, and S Occupancies, or portions thereof, where Class I, II, or Ill-A liquids are used (in any amount), mechanical exhaust shall be provided sufficient to produce six air changes per hour. Such mechanical exhaust shall be taken from a point at or near the floor. UBC, Section 1207.5(UBC, Section 1202.2.2 should be corrected to read like UBC, Section 1207.5 was corrected. Note there was no code change to remove the new F, M, and S Occupancies from this ventilation requirements.) 12. Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6. a) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC, Section 505.6. b) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC, Section 609.10. c) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size. See UMC, Table 5-B. d) Clearly show what is being exhausted by the exhaust system. e) Detail minimum duct conveying velocities as per UMC, Section 505.4 and Table 5-A. f) g) h) Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC, Section 609.4. Detail duct support as per UMC, Section 609.6. Detail fire protection as per UMC, Section 609.7. i) Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC, Section 609.8: • ENERGY CONSERVATION 13. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for new or relocated lighting in daylit areas and new daylit areas at relocated skylights. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (c). 14. Provide the complete lighting plans showing all the lighting shown in the lighting energy design, L TG-1 and L TG-2 forms 15. Provide the lighting plans for the new second floor office area shown on sheet A3.1. 16. Show bi-level lighting controls as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131 (b). 17. The Principal Envelope Designer must sign the ENV-1 form on sheet M-1X. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. I . I Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 18. The electrical sheets do not include the second floor remodel, which is the bulk of the permit. 19. Detail on the floor plans the installation of a dedicated neutral conductor for each ungrounded conductor where cord and plug connected modular office furniture is to be installed. NEC 605-8(d) (Both 1st. and 2nd floors) 20. Please specify the wiring methods that will be used at this facility. Local ordinance restricts the use of armored and NM cable to residential uses only. Clearly specify that AC and NM cable shall not be used as a wiring method. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressetj on the plans. Carlsbad 97-2342 9/4/97 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-2342 PREPARED BY: Mike Kratz DATE: 9/4/97 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1675 Faraday Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-n BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft. 2) MULTIPLIER ($) Air ConditioninQ Fire Sprinklers Per Application $202,696.00 TOTAL VALUE i:g] 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance:$ 1,000.00 i:g] 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 650.00 Type of Review: i:g] Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: . $ 520.00 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 •• ,1 .·, ', ,,. .. , .\,. •' ' , ... , ,. , I_ I •, • • ' • City of Carlsbad M§h·hB44Aht·i•l4·ki4i,,t4UI BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: ~-,3fo-C/7 PLANCHECKNO.: BUILDING ADDRESS: /0 ]:S ~ ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 7J ~--::_I - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in ·your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, · must be reviewed by this office · to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with V Make necessary corrections to plans or specifiafilio;s for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: By: Date: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE"ONL Y ~ ENGINEERING-AUlJ:LQRIZATION'TO ISSUE~BUILDING PERMIT: By: , I/ ~ ~ · Date: /Cy'/ 7 / '9~ . . ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of_Carlsbad ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4315 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A North Arrow B. Existing & Proposed Structures C .. Existing Street Improvements 2. Show on site plan: A Drainage Patterns D. Property Lines E. Easements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining ·street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. _______________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: _________ _ H:IWORDIDOCS\CHKLST1Buildlng Plencheck Cklsl BP0001 Form MM.doc 2 Rev. 12126/96 1 sr.r u u u u u BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ ______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: __________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application forr:i and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the complet~d application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineel'ing Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:____________ Date: ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ ______ _, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements pn the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on .the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ____ _ 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ _______ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:IWORD\DOCSICHKLST\Bullding Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fonn MM.doc 3 Rev. 12/26/96 • 'I ' 1st,/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading 0 0 0 0 requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Write "No Grading" on plot plan if none is required. 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 7d. No Grading Permit required. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fonn MM.doc 4 Rev. 12/26/96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District p·ersonnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11. NPDES PERMIT Compli_es with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best . management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 12. ~d fees are attached a No fees required 13. Additional Comments: H:IWORDIDOCSICHKLST\BuikUng Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fonn MM.doc 5 Rev. 12/26/96 ' ,· ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: /{o 7 Y f ~ f2,td_ Bldg. Permit No. C/3 Cf' Z d c3 ¢--~ Prepared by: IYJ A~ Date: 1o/t7/q7 Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _ EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 7t I q ~ IJ{ Sq. Ft./-l:-J-nits.: ]t J CZ {o EDU's: d._t> 7 7 =1:;:; ~ 4-b 3 3 o-FFt-e_ <J ,, s ep '7-c.red ., ~s ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use:~ Sq. Ft./l..J.R#s+--7, 7 o/lo ADT's: _ _,_/~/-~_,_- -tz:> ~ e>f-ti·ue_ :)c>)Doo / 5 ~ FEES REQUIRED: C.J·ecl'rl--u.1$ -sjl)DJ (_ 31> WITHIN CFO: ~S (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) ~IN-LIEU FEE / FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA: ___ _ ny'2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: //J ~DGE AND THOR_OUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ X X X NO. UNITS: __ _ FEE/ADT: _.;l.._)____ FEE/ADT: ___ _ ~CILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: ___ _ D NO =$ ;J,574- =$~CJ~- 4?~ UNIT/SQ.FT.: ____ _ X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: ___ _ ~~ ~WERFEE PERMIT No5 /? CJ ]Of J{o EDU's: de. 1J BENEFIT AREA: E x FEE/EDUJ f I 0 DRAINAGE BASIN: 5 G . I\ __,--------rou·s: ;;;J.o J 7 iw"(f6. DRAIN~GE_FEES PLDA. ___ _ X FEE/EDU: 2 7 o/ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ ACRES: _____ _ X FEE/AC: ___ _ 7. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ S; al f-- =$ ;;)l4-3S -i) =$ =$ -z::>- TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$ /OJ oa.3 *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 01/28/97 _J . :) };' ~ -"' " Q) .c t.) C: "' a: >, >, J:l J:l N "' 'lie 'lie ~ -"' 0 Q) Q) .c .c t) t) C: C: ro ro a: a: ~DD D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB q7--2.."3 l(e-Address /,b 7 r M!Ufp&yA rJl:7- Planner Van Lynch Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4325 APN: 2-IZ-J>O -'S > Type of Project and Use: /Iv !>us, 7.:,Z::. Project Density:_.:;...;AJ'-'½'-4.,.:__ ____ _ Zoning: C,W\. General Plan: P.I Facilities Management Zone: J- CFD lin~# -Date of participation: -Remaining net dev acres: .__ Circle One ---- (For non-residenti development: Type of land used created by this permit: N ~ ) Legend: ~ Item Complete , Environmental Re\liew Required: 0 YES Item Incomplete -Needs your action NO K TYPE ' ---- DATE OF COMPLETION: ______ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO K._ TYPE ___ _ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO. _______ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: __________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ------------------------ Coastal Z~ne Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO~ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. · incluslonary Housing :Fee ·rettuired; YES __ _ NO K (Effeptive date bf lriclusionary 'H9usirig Orpinarice , .M~y 2:1, 1993 ,) · Data Entry Gompl·eted,? YES ·. ·. NO _ . (Ehter c;s #; 'UACT; NEXT1'2; 'Cqnstrµct hbu~ihg Y./N; Ent~r F~e Amq1,mt' (See fee schedule for amount); Re~urn) , Site Plan: :fil I D-·1. Provi.de a fully :.dimem~ional· site· plan-·drawn to· s;cale. Show: North ar.rovv, pr.operty li'n.es-,. easemer.itsr eX:i~tinti ~nd' pJ~posed structures, streets, existing. streE}t improvemeh~s, right~6t-way w,i'c!.th, di'metisional setbacks and existing, topograp'b.ical-lines. ~D0-2. Provide leg qi description of :prpper,ty a_nd c!Ssessorrs parcel number. i ·oioo zqning-: 1. Setbacks: -· front: ,1v·G -~~ · -Interior Side: ' --tc c);:;6_ ·-' -s 1~ · 'Street id$: . Rear: l1Z.1 0 io .. 3. Lpt Cover,age: 'Required . Shown .:..-,---',,------------' --+-----'-- ·R~<ltiired . Shown B e quired.----"--=-~ Req ufreg --:..:..'-'-'---'--~----'--'-- -H~quired --£0.f . ----"'-.,--.....,a---'- Shown __ 2-...,7_'tf~----,-.,..,,.;.- Shown ------ 5; Pi3rklr,ig: Sp~ces Required-"'""·. _____ :2_/__.<f..._--'--_ Shown c.-:!@ ----=---- Guest Spaces Re.quired _· -'-------Shown --------'-- 0 D :o Additional Commer.its.__,.. ........... ....,.,,..-~-----......,.,....--,-------,----,---,--- ! DATE ~ .. u-47 J ' . - ' ' City of Carlsbad 97287 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 Reviewed by: ~ y Contact Name Hyndman & Hyndman Address 2611 South Highway 101 Ste 201 City, State _C_a_rd_iff_C_A_9_2_00_7 ____________ _ Bldg. Dept. No. CB97-2342 Planning No. Job Name Iris Tl Expansion Job Address --'1;_;;_6-=--75=---.:.....;Fa=ra=d=a"'--y _____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. _____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd __ _ 3rd. __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 97_2_8_7 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad 97287 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday, September 3, 1997 Contact Name Terry M_ontello Address 4715 60Th Street City, State San Diego CA 92115 Bldg. Dept. No. CB97-2342 Planning No. Job Name Iris Tl Expansion Job Address _1:...:::6-=-75=--.:_Fa=r=ad=a"'--y _____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ lgj Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd __ _ 3rd, __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 97_;;2_8_7 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619} 931-2121 tJtRTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Partl of2) ENV-1 , PROJECT NAME Building Penni! # Checked by/Date Enforcement Agency Use i BUILDING TYPE g NONRESIDENTIAL D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM I ~HASE OF CONSTRUCTION _:gr NEW C(?NSTRUCTION D ADDITION D ALTERATION D UNCONDITIONED (file affidavn) I ~ETHOD OF ENVELOPE D COMPONENT I <;:QMPLIANCE OVERALL ENVELOPE D PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE · fI11~s Certificate _of c~mpliance lists the ?uilding ~eatur~s and perf~rmance speci_fic_ations need to co~ply wit~ Title 24, Parts I r: 6 of the Cahforma Code ofRegulat10~~-This certificate apphes only to bmldmg envelope reqmrements. e documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DA TE f;::,/ 2,o ~ · 'e Principal Envelope Designer hereby cbrtifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction do·cuments is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other -·. -:ulations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope · 1uirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143, or 149 of Title 24, Part 6. 'lease check one: D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil Engineer or Architect. 0 I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. D I affirm that I am eligible uncle~ the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by section ___ _ of the · · · Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reasons: _______________________ _ PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER-NAME SIGNATURE For Detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential Manual lished by the California Energy Commission. · _N-1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. ENV-2: Used for all submittals; choose appropriate version depending on method of envelope compliance. ENV-3: Optional. __ Use if_d~fault U-v~~ues are not used. _Choose appropriate version for assembly U-value to be calculated. .. . Nonresidential Compliance Fonn CERTIFJCATE OF COMPLIANCE (P~rt2 of2) ENV-1'. OPAQUE ,SURFACES ASSEMBLY NAME (eg. Wall-I, Floor-I) .I:?,. -I -. ~. tJA(.)..., ., I ~ .. :;,.... WINDOWS WINDOW NAME (eg. Window-I) t0I Al-I ' SKYLiqHTS· SKYLIGHT NAME (eg. Sky-I) ~--(-\ I '.' . f.?.·. .. ·.: .... -..... .· •.. ; :.-.:~' . : . · .. ! . '\-,:~ . . . -:. ~ .... :. INSULATION R-VALUE (eg. R-19, R-22, etc.) /Z-/9 - NO.OF U-VALUE PAINS I /,'Z~ : ~~. ,. NOOF U-VALUE PANES I o.'1B . '; : .- . -:.: . Nonresidential Comnliance Form CONSTRUCTION TYPE LOCATION/COMMENTS (eg. Block, Wood, Metal) (eg. Suspended Ceiling, Demising, etc.) J·Jry.,o ~,Jc. FRAME TYPE (Metal, Wood, etc.) H"BTA-L. FRAME TYPE (Metal, Wood, etc.) '/-1eTA-L . ... · ··.· .. k<J7~t./c,,e e .Xt8f2.toR- EXTERIOR OVERHANG SHADE? CREDIT? N N '/ SKYLIGHT MATERIAL (Glass, Plastic, etc.) --Ac~uc::.. , l-' .. · .. · . GLAZING TYPE (eg. Clear, Tinted) "'· ~. I -,..,, i.,. • ! -~·,: ' . ...r •• •, ' . GLAZING TYPE (Clear, Low-E, etc.) .. NOTE TO FIELD. Building. Dept. Uac NOTE TO FIELD Building Dept. Use ; ~,' .•; ' NOTE TO FIELD Building Dept. Use January 1996 ': :,r : • .~· I. ' I. I, j: ... OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD (Partl of4) ENV-2 ! ?ROJECT NAME ! \\7.INDOW AREA TEST ' I I A. DISPLA y PERIMITER I B. GRbss EXTERIOR w ALL AREA C. GROSS EXTERIOR WALL AREA D. ENTER LARGER OF A ORB E. ENTER PROPOSED WINDOW AREA · 1FTx6= ;1-bo lsF x o.40= I ':)4e>o lsFx0.10= I I I DATE ~ .zo· co I SF DISPLAY AREA I ">0)2-I SF 40%AREA ~4-g I SF MINIMUM STANDARD AREA ·,~~Z-I SF MAXIMUM STANDARD AREA too&' I SF PROPOSED AREA IF E IS GREATER THAN D OR LESS THAN C, PROCEED TO THE NEXT CALCULATION FOR WINDOW AREA ADJUSTMENT. IF NOT, GO TO PART2OF4. 1. IF E if GREATER THAN D: : : ; i MAXIMUM STANDARD AREA 1 • Ii j; ·I · + 2. IF LESS THAN C: MINIMUM STANDARD AREA I : I PROPOSED WINDOW AREA I I WINDOW ADJUSTMENT FACTOR GO TO PART 4 TO CALCULATE ADJUSTED AREAS PROPOSED WINDOW AREA (IF E = 0, THEN ENTER 1) I l - WINDOW ADJUSTMENT FACTOR GO TO PART 4 TO CALCULATE ADJUSTED AREAS SKYI;,IGHT AREA TEST. . . .. ATRIUM HEIGHT _Q.lJL I X 0.05 X t2.1401- ·STANDARD% GROSS ROOF AREA STANDARD SKYLIGHT AREA PROPOSED SKYLIGHT AREA IF THE PROPOSED SKYLIGHT AREA IS GREATER THAN THE STANDARD SKYLIGHT AREA, PROCEED TO TIIE NEXT CALCULATION FOR THE SKYLIGHT AREA ADJUSTMENT. IF NOT, GO TO PART 2 OF 4. 1. IF PROPOSED SKYLIGHT AR]i;A ~ STANDARD SKYLIGHT AREA: STANDARD SKYLIGHT AREA I I Nonresi~ential Compliance Form PROPOSED SKYLIGHT AREA (IF E = 0, TIIEN ENTER 1) ..___ __ I - SKYLIGHT ADJUSTMENT FACTOR I GO TO PART 4 TO CALCULATE ADJUSTED AREAS January 1996 -'TVRALL ENVELo:nv ME ,'Tl.. . ' . ; / •,,, .. , ....... , ... I • .. • O "EJ T .£I TH0..1.1 1 '·.' :.:~ ·• : ·? . .,/:; /::,::~ar.f~)~I,4)..,.·. · .. _.:. ··. . . - PROPOSED I ASSEMBLY NAME HEAT (e.g. Wall-I, Floor-I) AREA CAPACITY U-VALUE W~t,L-\ 2411.. 1,. 2-0.74 C/'J ....J ....J ~ ...... ~-<. .... ...,_,, -\ 12 o1 t.-, o .. as1 en -I (!) z :J jjj (.) en LL 0 0 a:: en - 6 en en a:: 0 0 ....J LL lJ1d--l--l L /008 NIA /.23 C/'J NIA 3: CZl -0 ~ NIA Cl -· z p... ~ NIA 3: 0 --NIA - NIA 5+-1-I _j_ '4-NIA / .'!, / r en NIA ... CZl -:c r.i:i (!) ~ NIA :J -,:,.. ~ i::r.. NIA 0 -C/'J -NIA -.. NIA . . ... · * If Window and/or Skylight Area Adjustment is ;;,.;/ Required, use adjusted areas from part 4 of 4. Nonresidential Compliance Form TABLE VALUES? UA y I N (BX D) ~D ,~'2..°) DD DD DD DD DD 00 be.,~ DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD ~D ' )2-.~ DD DD DD DD DD gio e,4- DD DD DD DD DD TOTAL I DAT~/ 2o/'tJ7 j STANDARD : AREA* llA (Adj~sted) U-YALUE (F X G) ~.41'2-ac:.o") 11efa ' ! .1:z101b O-b7b ~2-I• ! ' 1008' t-2.~ b4-I.;;/ Column E shall be no greater than ColumnH ,2..4o ~+ January 1996 · ,, OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD . (P.art3 of4) -E_N:V'."2 OVERALL JIEAT GAIN · 0 • • • • • • • • • ' IWINDOW/SKYLIGHT NAME WEIGHTING (e.g Window-I, Sky-I) ' :FACTOR AREA SC H /;JIN-/ ', 7,4-~ .~7 :c ~ ' 0 :z ..,_, ! : '. l, : . 'I ; : I' j W//J-/ j I .oz. -G-~~ ' ti <C w ' ' Wrr.J-J J. ~ ( ;3G, "'*. ::c I-:::i 0 en ' v,J//J -/ J. Si']-~% :is I-en w s:: : '$~,'-/ ~-? ~4-~¥lo NIA en . NIA I-::c (.!) NIA :::::i >-NIA ::.:::: ' en NIA NIA • If Window and/or Skylight Area Adjustment is •• Only SC used for Required, use adjusted areas from part 4 of 4. Skylights Nonresidential Comoliance Form PROPOSED OVERHANG TOTAL V .HfV OHF (BxCxDxG) ~ - )$4- 2.(~ NIA NIA NIA f'27 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA IT! STANDARD AREA* RSGH (ADJUSTED) (or SC .. ) 204 0-'14- -e-0 .. 11 :,¾, c;,.il 4C::ii P-7/ b4-A' 8'6 Column H shall be no greater than ColumnK TOTAi. (BxlxJ) hC, - .ol~ 44s \27 I $0 TOTAL January 1996 · OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD. 0 (Part4 of 4) ENV-2 , I:, • • • ' I ?ROJECT NAME 1 1DOW AREAADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS · · i ! / ' I ' i ; . ! 1 ! i i ! 1 I I I I I I' CHECK IF NOT APPLICABLE (See Part I of 4.) • • I ~ WALLNAME (e.g. Wall-I, Wall-2) .~ ~ ... I I ORIENTATION _ N I E I s 1· w DODD oo·oo DODD DDD.D ood:o D001D ooo·o 000:0 DDD.D DODD DDD;D DODD DODD DODD DODD DODD DODD DODD [m [g [QI WINDOW ADJUSTED ADJUSTMENT WINDOW I GROSS DOOR WINDOW FACTOR AREA AREA AREA AREA (From Part I) (DxE) : TOTALS: ,__I --~-__,_I_· _ ___, Jx(cHECK IF NOT APPLICABLE (See Part·~ of 4.) ~ [ID [g SKYLIGHT ADJUSTED ADJUSMENT SKYLIGHT ROOFNAME GROSS SKYLIGHT FACTOR AREA (e.g. Roof-I, Roof-2) AREA AREA (From Part I) (CxD) . . . , TOTALS: . . Nonresidential Compliance Form [QI' ADJUSTED WALL AREA B-(F+C) ' I ' ADJUSTED ROOF AREA (B -E) January I 996 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (P.art1 ~r3) . MECH:.J .. . . . BUILDING TYPE D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D ADDITION D ALTERATION METHOD OF MECHANICAL, ~,PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLlA,NCE /~ D PERFORMANCE DATE I b 2o '7) Building Pennit II Checked by/Date Enforcement Agency Use D HOTEL/MOTEL GUESTROOM D UNCONDITIONED (file affidavit, This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specificatioh~ need to comply with Title 24, Parts I and 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building mechanical requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies thatthe'doc DOCUMENTATION AUTIIOR SIGNATURE l..JB'S-~n.J DATE I I 8 ZD c6 The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building design z;epresented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other ·1-;:ulations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the mechanical ,uirements contained in the applicable parts of Sections 110 through 115, 120 through 124, 140 through 142, 144 and 145. Please check one: D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, or Architect. affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed .contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. D I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section __ _ of the · Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason(s): ---------=~:;__---+--------;,,=-r'------ Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measure INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT _ For Detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission. MECH-I: Required on plans for all subniittals. Parts 2 & 3 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. ---:H-2: Required for all submittals; choose appropriate version depending on method of mechanical compliance. · ._....;-CH-3: Required for all submittals, but may be incorporated in schedules on plans · MECH-4: Required for all submittals unless required outdoor v~ntilation rates and airflows are shown on plans per Section 4.3.4. Nonresidential Compliance Form January I 996 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (P.art2 of3) MECH-1 I PROJECT NAME . -t-He SYSTEM FEATURES --I MECHANICAL SYSTEMS I I SYSTEM NAME NOTE TO FIELD ' I tte 1x-4x.r1ll 11· Building. Dept. Use r . TIME CONTROL '? j SETBACK CONTROL ~ ; ' ; ISOLATION ZONES :g. - HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? "'( ' ' ELECTRIC HEAT? .r-J ' FAN CONTROL f.J/4 ... .,~- VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? ~-. ' ' SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? 1"1:' : I I, I j HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? iN.· j ' VENTILATION ~-- OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL? A ECONOMIZER TYPE A DESIGN AIR CFM (MECH-4, COLUMN H) * HEATING EQUIP. TYPE -~i f u-,-Jvf ! HIGH EFFICIENCY? I IF YES ENTER EFF. # N I ' I I MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER * ., COOLING EQUIP. TYPE ~,f'urv\P HIGH EFFICIENCY? I IF YES ENTER EFF. # ,-.j I .. I I MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER ~ I CODE TABLES: Enter code from table below into columns above. I I TIME CONTROL SETBACK ISOLATION FAN HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? CTRL. ZONES CONTROL ELECTRIC HEAT? S: Prog. Switch H: Heating Enter number of I: Inlet Vanes 0: Occupancy Sensor C: Cooling Isolation Zones P: Variable Pitch VAY MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? Y:Yes M: Manual Timer B:Both V:VFD 0: Other SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL?·. N:No C:Curve HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? VENTILATION OUTDOOR ECONOMIZER O.A.CFM DAMPER HIGH EFFICIENCY? B: Air Balance A: Auto A:Air Enter Outdoor C: Outside Air Cert. G: Gravity W: Water AirCFM. -~see ~00$ &~-~s M: Out. Air Measure N: Not Required Note: Thjs shall D: Demand Control be no less than N: Natural ColumnGon MECH-4. NOTES TO FIELD -For Building Department Use Only • .1; ••• .. _. .: . . : ... :. ·:•: :.._ . . . : : ~ . ·:. ·: , : •. ,'t . .··-.-.·:·/c ; : ·._, ) ;;,._ . . . . ~ : . ,:. ···.:·.· .. -. . ,! . . . .. ··.-~}· -_.~ ., : . .... :_.. .:·.: I ' • ' ~. • I • Nonresidential Compliance Fonn January 1996 ~RTIFICATE 'OF COMPLIANCE (Part3 of3) MECH-1 ~--r.P- I: SYSTEM NAME DUCT LOCATION (Roof, Plenum, etc.) I #f, \ X ..:4-x, It ..r, ~-· I I I I I I ·,i...: _, I; I I. I: i: ' I. ! : ! I i i PIPE INSULATJON ' - SYSTEM NAME PIPE TYPE (Supply, Return, etc.) NA i ; : NOTES TO FIELD -For.Building Department Use Only .. •. . . ~. . .... __ .. ., . ~;: . · . ·-. -~-:·· .· . t' • .,,. . . ', . '. r: --·>·· :-. .-: .. . . •, .... _ ·._·· ... ----... _ .. ::,. --·_:-: .·-:_:::-/:'t/-_.:·::· ·-, .. ·.-.... Nonresidential Compliance Fonn ·=· .... DUCT TAPE ALLOWED? y N Ej,g- DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD I INSULATION I REQ'D? I y IN I DD DD DD DD DD DD DD D-D .. DD DUCT INSULATION NOTE TO FIELD R-VALUE Building. Dept. Use - NOTE TO FIELD Building. Dept. Use January 1996 MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER . . · MECH~2 . ' ~ 0 C - PROJECT NAME b SYSTEM NAME I NOTE: Provide one copy of this fonn for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. SIZING and EQUIPMENT SELECTION 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: -OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE -OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE -INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2.SIZ~G (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) ! ; -DESIGN OUTDOOR AIR .___z_z_s __ ~ICFM (MECH 4! fOLUMN H) -ENVELOPE LOAD -LIGHTING )-$ WATTS/ SF (LTG-2) _ ___,_ __ _ COOLING I HEATING I 83· -~ b1 r. r---+----. 19:> I. 2.. ' I 21 .'Z.. ) 1.s -PEOPLE IS # OF PEOPLE (MECH 4; COLUMN E) 1-----':c------i ?-i -MISC. EQUIPMENT () •. S WA ITS/ SF 2.s -OTHER ( PROCESS LOADS, DUCT ) i-------~-· _$__ CoM fJ:r:e~S • OTHER LOSS, INFILTRATION, ETC.. (Describe) ! \;.~ ' (Describe) TOTALS I ?3.'6 11 / I SAFETY/ WARM UP FACTOR MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (TOTALS FROM ABOVE x SAFETY I W ARMUP FACTOR) Efilj~ 3. SELECTION: INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF INSTALLED CAPACITY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD, EXPLAIN .. DESIGN FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE HP NA-<.2$ NOTE: Include only fan systems exceeding 25 HP (see§ 144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not exceed 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM for VAV systems. Nonresidential Compliance Form EFFICIENCY MOTOR DRIVE I ~~.-z--·11 '?t I Kbtu I Hr Kbtu'/ Hr NUMBER PEAK WATTS CFM OF FANS Bx Ex 746 I (C x D) (Supply Fans) TOTALS I ;:::I === TOTAL FAN SYSTEM I . . POWER DEMAND Col. FI Col.Gr' WATTS/CFM January 1996 MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER . · ~CH-2 PROJECT NAME SYSTEM NAME \~.s b 0 --At--r-~t2.~1&-e ~~o -2-X I NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. SIZING and EQUIPMENT SELECTION 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: -OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE -OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE -_INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2. SIZI~G (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) -DESIGN OUTDOOR AIR .__-=8_0 _ ____.lcFM (MECH 4; ~OLUMN H) -ENVELOPE LOAD -LIGHTING ). $ WA TIS / SF (LTG-2) f------'----i DATE,-;) J ' .o,-ZO tt>7- Fl.:OORAREA . SI 2-""-· ... .. ~t}Ej COOLiNG .B,3- 1: 1 · Ojfl-I ;)4_·~1 -Z;G::> -PEOPLE 5, # OF PEOPLE (MECH 4; COLUMN E) \-~ ------; -MISC. EQUIPMENT 0, S WATTS I SF 0-~ -oTHER ( PROCEss LOADS, DUCT ) __ '>_-_s_--=-~~ ..... M ...... &D.___""".e(l.!'------6 __ • OTHER LOSS, INFILTRATION, ETC.. (Describe) "~ l I ' (Describe) TOTALS SAFETY/ WARM UP FACTOR MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (TOTALS FROM ABOVE x SAFETY/ WARMUP FACTOR) 3. SELECTION: INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF INSTALLED CAPACITY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD, EXPLAIN . -[Al DESIGN FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE HP NA-<2-S 'OTE: Include only fan systems exceeding 25 HP (see§ 144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not exceed 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM for VA V systems. Nonresidential Compliance Form EFFICIENCY MOTOR DRIVE .. NUMBER OF FANS I ,z.4_ ~ · I I '9 Kbtu / Hr ,__K_b_tu-;--'/_H_r ~ PEAK WATTS B x Ex 746 I (C x D) CFM (Supply Fans) TOTALS I ;::I === TOTAL FAN SYSTEM I . POWER DEMAND Col.F I Col. 0 r · WATTS/CFM January 1996 MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER . · MECH-2 \\€-1.S b SYS"::M NAME j J'oiOTI:.: Provide one copy of this form for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. SIZJNG and EQUJPMENT SELECTJON 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: -OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE -OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE -INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2.SIZi~G -DESIGN OUTDOOR AIR -ENVELOPE LOAD -LIGHTING -PEOPLE -MISC. EQUIPMENT -OTHER ( PROCESS LOADS, DUCT ) -OTHER LOSS, INFILTRATION, ETC .. SAFETY/ WARM UP FACTOR (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) ! . f' ~~ / JcFM (MECH 4; COLUMN H) o:, ). $ WATTS/ SF (LTG-2) • 4 :;) # OF PEOPLE (MECH 4; COLUMN E) '2.? t--------1 O. S.. WATTS I SF \.$ s . s Coi,.A f'-'T"~~ Io . :, ! (Describe) (Describe) TOTALS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (TOTALS FROM ABOVE x SAFETY I W ARMUP FACTOR) 3. SELECTION: INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF INSTALLED CAPACITY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD, EXPLAIN . .. DESIGI'fi EFFICIENCY NUMBER PEAK WATTS FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE Hf MOTOR DRIVE OF FANS B x Ex 746 / (C x D) NA-.( 'l'S ' '. ' : ! ' 0 CFM (Supply Fans) , ·oTE: Include only fan systems exceeding 25 HP (see § 144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not exceed 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM for VAV systems. TOTALS .___ _ ___.I ::=:I -== TOTAL FAN SYSTEM I , . : 1 POWER DEMAND Col FI Col G 1 · WATTS/CFM . . Nomesidential Compliance Fonn January 1996 MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER . . · ~CH-2 I PROJECT NAME I SYSTEM NAME · = \~.s b 0 -At--r~'2.~7"~ e,xf~~o DA~ e; Zo/ CIJ7. -4 I NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. SIZING and EQUIPMENT SELECTION 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: -OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE -OUTDOOR, WET BULB TEMPERATURE -INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2.SIZ~G (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) l. -DESIGN OUTDOOR AIR 'Jo/;$ lcFM (MECH 4; COLUM!i1:H) --;-~--. j, -ENVELOPE LOAD -LIGHTING )-$ WA ITS / SF (LTG-2) -~--- FLOOR AREA ·· . b64o .;, __ ., '' .---------.~ COOLING 83· -PEOPLE ~&-:; # OF PEOPLE (MECH 4; COLUMN E) 1----'-"""''---1 1---'-=-_..;;;_---l -MISC. EQUIPMENT O. S WATTS / SF -OTHER ( PROCESS LOADS, DUCT ) t-----'-3_._s__ UPM.f~e:-e..s _ OTHER LOSS, INFILTRATION, ETC.. (Describe) (Describe) TOTALS SAFETY/ WARM UP FACTOR MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (TOTALS FROM ABOVE x SAFETY/ WARMUP FACTOR) 3. SELECTION: INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF INSTALLED CAPACITY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD, EXPLAIN . . [A] DESIGN FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE HP NA-<2:, 'OTE: Include only fan systems exceeding 25 HP (see § 144). Total Fan System Power Demand may not exceed 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM for VA V systems. Nonresidential Compliance Form EFFICIENCY NUMBER PEAK WATTS CFM MOTOR DRIVE OF FANS B x Ex 746 / (C x D) (Supply Fans) TOTALS __ ___.I ,--I.____- TOTAL FAN SYSTEM I '' POWER DEMAND C 1 F/Col 0 1 · WATTS I CFM O • • January 1996 .... MECHANICAL SIZING AND FAN POWER . · ~CH-2 I PROJECT NAME I SYSTEM NAME l~s 6 DATE I I 8 2.o ?7 FLOOkAREA _. . 2-b s ·z. :;.., ___ _, I NOTE: Provide one copy of this form for each mechanical system when using the Prescriptive Approach. SIZING and EQUIPMENT SELECTION 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS: -OUTDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE -OUTDOOR,WETBULBTEMPERATURE -INDOOR, DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 2. SIZiNG (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) (APPENDIX C) .. COOLING ,_~ l. -DEsmN ouTDooR AIR .f o 5 I cFM CMEcH 4; coLuMN H) 2. ,z. 1 ; • ENVELOPE LOAD 6,. O ; } 1 ' -LIGHTING ). $ WATTS I SF (LTG-2) I 3.(-~ - • PEOPLE i1 # OF PEOPLE (MECH 4; COLUMN E) ~-f 1--~----1 -MISC.EQUIPMENT 9.9· WATTS/SF 4.S • OTHER ( PROCESS LOADS, DUCT ) i----~--s__ ~~~s f---'~'--'1_. ;-'--_ CD, .. _ OTHER LOSS, INFILTRATION, ETC.. (Describe) LU (Describe) TOTALS I bS~4 II / I SAFE'fY/ WARM UP F:ACTOR MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD (TOTALS FROM ABOVE x SAFETY/ WARMUP FACTOR) ~Eb 3. SELECTION: INSTALLED EQUIPMENT CAPACITY IF INSTALLED CAPACITY EXCEEDS MAXIMUM ADJUSTED LOAD, EXPLAIN . . [XJ rm I : i . ' DESIGN : : FAN DESCRIPTION BRAKE-~P NA-<..'l:,: : '. ' ; ! ' NOTE: Include only fan systems exceeding 25 HP (see§ 144). , Total Fan System Power Demand may not exceed 0.8 Watts/CFM for constant volume systems or 1.25 Watts/CFM for VAV systems. · : : Nonresidential Compliance Form EFFICIENCY NUMBER MOTOR DRIVE OF FANS TOTALS ( I 1!:> .4 11 '(/ I Kbtu / Hr Kbtu'/ Hr PEAK WATTS CFM B x Ex 746 / (C x D) (Supply Fans) ...__ _ ______.I ~I == TOTAL FAN SYSTEM I POWER DEMAND Col.FI Col.GI WATTS/CFM January 1996 MECHANJCAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY · · MECH~3. I OLING EQUIPMENT . SYSTEM MAKE AND. DESIGN OUTPUT ' NAME MODELNO. (BTU /HR) +if IX ~e__ ' ! ~3 z.ec, So-r-.\a, m<i<' 2-)<J '' !24 '2-o::::, -~i.'\0-oe)4-;~ 4-, ,-_\ r., r:n s -3;,"o-c::, ' 4;< :So f:.. \c:, o '2-4-· . I r4bO-D /7 <o-r_'\f":\rr)q . 73 ,4o::, .-. •, - i i ' i ' TOTAL DESIGNCFM txx,D 1~ 1r,,.,o:::, ~~ 34oo RATED EFFICIENCY !ECONOMIZER! UNITS ALLOWED PROPOSED I y I N I .o o.o. D-0 ~D ~D ,EJD ~D KJD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD HEATING EQUJPMENT ,· · ··. ··· : . · ·. · .. ·· · · .... . . ·., \. . :·: · .. · :·. ' . . . . ") , . . .. SYSTEM l\'.IAKE AND DESIGN OUTPUT NAME MODEL NO. (BTU /HR) -Hf .. fx ~·l:¾. ~ Q008' -" 2.)< S'o.i.JCS? 004-3+400 3)< . so-rJev oo S 4~~00 4X ~JQ 024 2.2>2 000 l '1JQ 00 31~ •, ' __ , -------------1---------1 .. _,,., Nonresidential Compliance Fonn RATED EFFICIENCY UNITS ALLOWED PROPOSED C%,f' ?.O s.o t-iSfr ~.~ 6-7 +½fF G,~t.P -,.o C@() ?-0 2.~ Cef> 3-0 ;>.0 January I 996 > ' N.IEC~CAL VENTILATION ' MECH-4 PROJECT NAME SYSTEM NAME I NOTE: Provide one copy of this fonn for each mechanical system. MECHANICAL VENTILATION SPACE NO. IJl,/X zx 4X I AREA BASIS COND· CFM MIN. AREA PER SF CFM (SF) (BXC) J47i-,JS i-z..1 ?/A-i 1"7 M t-;o b'.Ao fol~ ZS'Z.-...., I' ~~ ! ·- OCCUPANCY BASIS NO. OF PEOPLE /S z. MIN. CFM (EX 15) s . [gJ REQ'D. O.A. (MAX.OF DORF) 2:is 11 /3S )o/S 4o5 DESIGN OUTDOOR AIR /3S lo!S <; TOTALS (FOR MECH-2) I )8S1 11 /f%o I Based on Expected Number of Occupants or at least 50% of Chapter 33 UBC Occupant Density Must be greater than or equal to G, or"use Transfer Air [I] VAVMINIMUM CFM LARGEST DESIGN MIN. MIN. CFM CFM iJ,5-N~ ' ' , [RI. : TRANS- FER AIR I ! ; IC: Minimum Ventilation Rate per S~~tion § 121, Table 1-F. If zone reheat or recool is used, I must be less than or equal to G, or less than or equal to Total Design CFM X 0.3, or less than or equal to BX 0.4, or less I' or equal to 300 CFM, whichever is larger. Must be less than or equal to I (if applicable), but no less than G, unless Transfer Air (K) is used. Must be greater than or equal to (G -H), and, for VAV, greater than or equal to (G -J). . Nonresidential Compliance Form January 1996